alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Filed 6/28/22 G.T. v. Madera County Dept. of S o cial Serives etc. CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

G.T.,

Petitioner and Appellant,

v.

MADERA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES/CHILD WELFARE SERVICES et al.

, Respondents. F082698

(Super. Ct. No. MJP018547)



### OPINION

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Madera County. Thomas L. Bender, Judge. Munger Tolles & Olson, Jordan D. Segall and Lloyd S. Marshall; University of California at Irvine School of Law, Susan E. Seager and Jack Lerner for Petitioner and Appellant. Regina A. Garza, County Counsel, and Christopher B. Dorian, for Respondent Madera County Department of Social Services/Child Welfare Services. Beth A. Sears, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Respondent T.S

.

- ooOoo

-2

.

In this proceeding, G.T. appeals from the juvenile court’s order denying his petition to obtain the juvenile case file of T.S., a deceased child whose parents have been charged with his murder, under Welfare and Institutions Code section 827,

subdivision (a)(2). G.T. argues the juvenile court erred in denying his petition because it: (1) failed to hold a hearing; (2) considered imp ermissible factors when deciding whether to release T.S.’s records; and (3) failed to make factual findings to support its denial of his request. G.T. asks us to reverse the juvenile court’s order and either order release of the juvenile case file or rema nd the matter to the juvenile court for it to review his petition under the proper standards. After G.T. filed this appeal, he filed a petition for writ of mandate or prohibition, in which he made the same arguments as in this appeal and sought to compel t he juvenile court to vacate its order denying his petition and either enter an order granting the petition or remand for a hearing under the proper standards. We recently issued an opinion in the writ proceeding, in which we granted the writ petition and ordered issuance of a peremptory writ of mandate directing the juvenile court to vacate its order denying the petition and hold a hearing on G.T.’s request for the disclosure of T.S.’s juvenile case file. ( Therolf v. Superior Court (June 2 8 , 2022, F082993 ) [nonpub. opn.] .) Since we have granted the relief G.T. seeks in this appeal, there is no further relief we may grant. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal as moot.3

. DISPOSITION The appeal is dismissed as moot. 1

MEEHAN, J. WE CONCUR:

LEVY, Acting P. J.

POOCHIGIAN, J.

1 Appellant’s request for judicial notice, filed July 12, 2021, is denied as moot.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Discovery Oil, Ltd, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew V. Ippolito, President and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Andrew V. Ippolito

By  __________________________________

Andrew V. Ippolito

President, Chairman of the Board

Date:  August 20, 2010









A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Discovery Oil, Ltd. and will be retained by the Company to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7793
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LARRY J. BUDD, Defendant - Appellant.
No. 02-7813
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LARRY J. BUDD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CR73-598-M, CR-73-644-M, CA-02-1948-DKC, CA-02-1949-DKC) Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: March 25, 20032 Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry J. Budd, Appellant Pro Se. Daphene Rose McFerren, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Larry J. Budd seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his motions filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2255 motion solely on procedural grounds, a cert ificate of appealability will not issue unless the movant can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Budd has not made the requisite showing. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , U.S. , 2003 WL 431659, *10 (U.S. Feb. 25, 2003) (No. 01-7662). We deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
#### § 57.7010 Power failures.

In the event of power failure, drill controls shall be placed in the neutral position until power is restored.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9524 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9524

   To enhance subnational diplomacy efforts within the Department of 
                     State, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 10, 2024

  Mr. Lieu (for himself, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, and Mr. Meeks) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                            Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To enhance subnational diplomacy efforts within the Department of 
                     State, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Enhancing Subnational Diplomacy 
Act''.

SEC. 2. SUBNATIONAL DIPLOMACY UNIT AUTHORITIES.

    To enable its work with states, counties, cities and other 
municipalities in the United States, the State Department is authorized 
to provide assistance to elected officials at the state, county and 
city level in the United States (including their staff) to participate 
in international activities that the Secretary determines align with 
the United States government's interests in promoting subnational 
engagement in foreign policy, including providing assistance in 
attracting or bidding for hosting of major international events, 
capacity building around internationally-oriented staff, funding travel 
of United States elected officials at the state, county and city level 
in the United States to participate in meetings, conferences, workshops 
and other gatherings with foreign officials, and funding the costs 
associated with memberships in United States and internationally based 
organizations.

SEC. 3. GRANT ASSISTANCE.

    The Secretary of State may, in consultation with the heads of 
relevant agencies, award grants to eligible subnational United States 
government entities to carry out technical assistance, public 
diplomacy, and commercial diplomacy projects in collaboration with 
interagency partners to better augment United States government service 
delivery and/or support United States foreign policy goals.
                                 <all>
```
§ 77.406 Drive belts. ( a ) Drive belts shall not be shifted while in motion unless the machines are provided with mechanical shifters.
( b ) Belt dressing shall not be applied while belts are in motion except where it can be applied without endangering a person.
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the quarterly report of The Dewey Electronics
Corporation (the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John H. D. Dewey, Chief Executive
Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS 1350, as
adopted pursuant to SS 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Corporation.

/s/ John H.D. Dewey
John H. D. Dewey, Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 12, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to The Dewey Electronics Corporation and will be retained
by The Dewey Electronics Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
exchange commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-10127

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

FREDERICK ALLEN KNOX,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:95-CR-254-X

- - - - - - - - - -

December 10, 1996

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Frederick Allen Knox appeals his sentence for conspiracy to

commit bank fraud. Knox contends that the district court erred

by departing from the guideline sentencing range to sentence him

to 60 months’ imprisonment and that the district court failed to

explicitly consider and reject sentences in between the guideline

sentencing range and the 60-month term.
No. 96-10127

- 2 -

The departure to 60 months was not an abuse of discretion. 

Knox’s record of arrests on similar charges, his record of

pending charges and disappearances, and his convictions of

similar offenses suggest that his criminal history category did

not adequately reflect the seriousness of his past conduct and

that Knox will commit similar offenses after his release. See

United States v. Ashburn, 38 F.3d 803, 807-08 (5th Cir. 1994),

cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1969 (1995); United States v. Rosogie,

21 F.3d 632, 634 (5th Cir. 1994). The district court’s

explanation that Knox’s history justified a departure to 60

months was adequate; the court need not have explicitly discussed

and rejected each possible sentencing range between the guideline

range and 60 months. United States v. Lambert, 984 F.2d 658,

662-63 (5th Cir. 1993)(en banc).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report of Constar International Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Walter S. Sobon, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ WALTER S. SOBON                                                 
|Walter S. Sobon Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

May 15, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-01-1998
<CASH>                                           1,649
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,063
<ALLOWANCES>                                       195
<INVENTORY>                                     63,437
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                83,700
<PP&E>                                          14,408
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 127,726
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,762
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,661
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   127,726
<SALES>                                        102,240
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           65,848
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,813
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   608
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 967
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,004
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,201
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,803
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20
        

</TABLE>
#### § 9.151 Program accessibility: new construction and alterations.

Each building or part of a building that is constructed or altered by, on behalf of, or for the use of the agency shall be designed, constructed, or altered and provide emergency egress so as to be readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities. The definitions, requirements, and accessibility standards that apply to buildings covered by this section are those contained in the UFAS, except where the ADAAG provides for greater accessibility for the type of construction or alteration being undertaken, and in this case, the definitions, requirements and standards of the ADAAG shall apply.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                             -----------------------

                                    FORM 8-K

                             -----------------------

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

         Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): June 5, 2003

                            MS Structured Asset Corp.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

          Delaware                   333-64879              13-4026700
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(State or Other Jurisdiction     (Commission File          (IRS Employer
      of Incorporation)               Number)           Identification No.)

    1585 Broadway, New York, New York                         10036
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                   (Zip Code)

        Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 212-761-2520

                                 Not Applicable
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

<PAGE>


Item 7.         Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and
                Exhibits

Exhibit 4.1     Trust Agreement

Exhibit 5.1     Validity Opinion of Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton

Exhibit 23.1    Consent of Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton (included in
                Exhibit 5.1)

<PAGE>
                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereto duly authorized.

Date: June 10, 2003

                                         MS STRUCTURED ASSET CORP.
                                         (Registrant)


                                         By: /s/ John Kehoe
                                             ---------------------------------
                                         Name:  John Kehoe
                                         Title: Vice President

<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit 4.1     Trust Agreement

Exhibit 5.1     Validity Opinion of Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton

Exhibit 23.1    Consent of Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton (included in
                Exhibit 5.1)
§ 70.202 Certified person; sampling. ( a ) The respirable dust sampling required by this part shall be performed by a certified person.
( b ) To be certified, a person shall complete the applicable MSHA course of instruction and pass the MSHA examination demonstrating competency in sampling procedures. Persons not certified in sampling, and those certified only in maintenance and calibration procedures in accordance with § 70.203(b), are not permitted to collect respirable dust samples required by this part or handle approved sampling devices when being used in sampling.
( c ) To maintain certification, a person must pass the MSHA examination demonstrating competency in sampling procedures every three years.
( d ) MSHA may revoke a person's certification for failing to properly carry out the required sampling procedures.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9721 

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 

to add whistleblower protections to certain modified contracts, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2024 

Ms. DE LA CRUZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2013 to add whistleblower protections to certain 

modified contracts, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Access to 

5 Whistleblower Protections Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9721 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOP2 MENT CONTRACTS. 

3 Section 828(b)(3) of the National Defense Authoriza4 tion Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 

5 Stat. 1841) is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘At the time’’ and inserting the 

7 following: 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—At the time’’; and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub10 paragraph: 

11 ‘‘(B) DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND

12 URBAN DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTS.— 

13 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—At the time of any 

14 covered modification to a contract that the 

15 Secretary of Housing and Urban Develop16 ment has awarded before the date that is 

17 180 days after the date of the enactment 

18 of this Act, the Secretary of Housing and 

19 Urban Development shall make best efforts 

20 to include in the contract a contract clause 

21 providing for the applicability of the 

22 amendments made by this section to the 

23 contract. 

24 ‘‘(ii) COVERED MODIFICATION DE25 FINED.—In this subparagraph, the term 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 9721 IH

1 ‘covered modification’ means any modifica2 tion, including a modification relating to— 

3 ‘‘(I) a contract option year; 

4 ‘‘(II) a contract extension; 

5 ‘‘(III) a contract renewal; 

6 ‘‘(IV) a review for approval of or 

7 execution of an annual contributions 

8 contract; 

9 ‘‘(V) a substantial deviation; 

10 ‘‘(VI) a significant amendment; 

11 or 

12 ‘‘(VII) an annual cost or rent ad13 justment.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB