alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Sidney McCoy, Respondent, v. S. Bochow et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal by the employer and its carrier from decisions and an award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board on the grounds that there is no substantial medical evidence to support the board’s determination of causal relationship between claimant’s accident and the rheumatoid arthritis from which he is suffering. On March 8, 1956, while claimant was installing electrical equipment in a hanging ceiling, the ladder on which he was working “ walked away ” from him. Instinctively he grabbed the ceiling which was 18 feet from the ground and held himself suspended till his arms weakened and he dropped to the floor landing on his feet. Claimant noticed no immediate effect from the fall and continued working. That evening, however, he developed such severe pain in his arms, shoulders and wrists that he went to a hospital for emergency treatment. During the next few weeks the pain became so severe that claimant was unable to work but gradually after a number of treatments he was sufficiently improved and returned to work. Soon after he returned to work, however, his ankles and feet became swollen and pain developed again in his wrists, hands and elbow. His disability was diagnosed as rheumatoid arthritis. The Referee after a hearing determined that this disability was not causally related to the accident of March 8, 1956. On appeal the board reversed this determination and found that the accident had *“*activated and aggravated a pre-existing rheumatoid arthritis.” Almost a year later the board on its own motion ordered reargument of the case, reversed its prior decision and referred the ease and claimant to an impartial specialist on the question of causal relationship. The specialist found causal relationship in that the trauma aggravated the pre-existing arthritis, and consequently the board reinstated and" affirmed its prior decision. Appellants assert that there is no substantial evidence to support the board’s determination. We cannot agree. The impartial specialist testified that while the accident did not cause the arthritis it aggravated or precipitated the condition. Appellants’ experts while denying connection admit the possibility of such a causal relationship. Thus there exists only the usual conflict of medical opinions which the board has resolved in favor of claimant. We cannot say that this determination is without substantial support in the record *(Matter of De Luca*v. *Garrett & Co.,*12 A D 2d 569, motion for leave to appeal denied 9 N Y 2d 609). Decisions and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
FREMONT

CARBON

SWEETWATER

ALBANY

NATRONA

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

CONVERSE

CROOK

UINTA

LARAMIE

WESTON

PLATTE

GOSHEN

NIOBRARA

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

Bridger-Teton

Thunder 

Basin

Medicine-Bow

Medicine-Bow

Rawlins

Casper

Rock Springs

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Yellowstone Newcastle

National Park

Lusk

Yoder

Hanna

Baggs

Afton

Hulett

Glendo

Casper

Douglas

Bairoil

Rawlins

Laramie

Superior

Sundance

Saratoga

La Barge Guernsey

Pinedale

Kemmerer

Evanston

Cheyenne

Wheatland

Wamsutter

Cokeville

Chugwater

Big Piney

Newcastle

Torrington

Rock River

Pine Bluffs

Green River

Medicine Bow

Fort Laramie

Elk Mountain

Rock Springs

Grand Encampment

0 25 50 100

Miles

0 25 50 100

Kilometers

Wyoming Sage-Grouse 

Land Use Plan Amendments

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF 

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

LUP Amendments Planning Area

BLM Field Office Boundary

Forest Service Planning Unit Boundary

Withdrawn from Mineral Entry

Proposed Withdrawal from Mineral Entry

BLM and USFS Surface Lands

Sage-grouse Priority/Core Habitat Areas

Sage-grouse Connectivity Habitat Areas

Counties

Water

Interstate

State / US Hwy

Cities

Map 2-21: Alternative C

Areas Withdrawn 

from Mineral Entry
#### Ralph Rappaport, Respondent, v Leo Blank et al., Appellants, and Irving Miller, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered October 12, 1977, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the first, second, third, fourth, sixth, ninth and fourteenth causes of action, unanimously modified, on the law, by dismissing the sixth and ninth causes of action, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 25, 1978, insofar as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered April 27, 1978, which, *inter alia,*dismissed the sixth cause of action and denied plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the sixth counterclaim, unanimously modified, on the law, by vacating as academic so much thereof as dismissed the sixth cause and by dismissing the sixth counterclaim with leave to replead, and, as modified, affirmed, *691without costs and without disbursements. An action based upon services rendered is governed by a six-year Statute of Limitations (CPLR 213, subd 2). Defendant Leo Blank asserts that the action in chief was commenced on June 8, 1977. Therefore, the six-year Statute of Limitations bars any claim for services allegedly rendered prior to June 8, 1971. *(Trans Amer. Dev. Corp. v Leon,*279 App Div 189, affd 305 NY 590.) The documentary evidence indicates that the services underlying the sixth and ninth causes were rendered prior to June 8, 1971. Hence, those causes must be dismissed as time barred. Since the sixth cause should have been dismissed in the order, entered October 12, 1977, the dismissal of that cause in the order, entered April 27, 1978, is rendered academic. The order, entered April 27, 1978, must be modified accordingly. Defendant Leo Blank’s first cross claim and his sixth counterclaim alleged the same basis for relief sounding in conspiracy. The order, entered January 25, 1978, was correct in dismissing the first cross claim with leave to replead because the overt acts underlying the conspiracy were not pleaded (8 NY Jur, Conspiracy, § 4, p 498). Similarly, the sixth counterclaim of Leo Blank should have been dismissed with leave to replead given in the order, entered April 27, 1978. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Evans, Markewich and Yesawich, JJ.
### §403u. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 403u, comprising section 21 of the Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949, act June 20, 1949, ch. 227, was editorially reclassified as section 3521 of this title.
Map 3-26: Pronghorn Antelope

Habitat

0 20 40 60 80

Kilometers

0 20 40 60 80

Miles

1

LUP Amendments Planning Area

BLM Field Office Boundaries

Forest Service Planning Unit Boundaries

County Boundaries

Parturition Areas

Crucial Severe Winter Relief

Crucial Winter Range

Crucial Winter/Yearlong

Spring/Summer/Fall

Severe Winter Relief

Winter

Winter/Yearlong

Yearlong

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Final Environmental Impact Statement - May 2015

W Y O M I N G

M T

I D

M A P A R E A

Crook

Weston

Sundance

Rock Springs

Field Office

§ ̈¦80

U T

C O

N E

S D

Newcastle

Lusk

Douglas

Casper

Cheyenne

Wheatland Torrington

Laramie

Rawlins

Rock Springs

Green River

Evanston

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Rawlins Field Offi ce

Casper Field Offi ce

Newcastle

Field Office

Pinedale

Field Office

Kemmerer

Field Office

Bridger -

Teton

N.F.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine Bow

N.F.

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

Platte

G

o

s

h

e

n

Alb

a

n

y

L

a

r

a

mie

C

o

n

v

e

r

s

e

Nio

b

r

a

r

a

Nat rona

Carbon

S

w

e

etw

ate

r

C

a

r

b

o

n

Sublette

Lincoln

T

eto

n

Fr

e

m

o

nt

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2282-2283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-831]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Paducah

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of cancellation of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On December 23, 2011, the Department of Energy (DOE) published 
a notice of open meeting announcing a meeting on January 19, 2012, of 
the Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Paducah. 
This notice announces the cancellation of this meeting. The meeting is 
being cancelled because the board will not have a quorum due to 
scheduling conflicts by members. The next regular meeting will be held 
on February 16, 2012.

DATES: The meeting scheduled for January 19, 2012, announced in the

[[Page 2283]]

December 23, 2011, issue of the Federal Register (FR Doc. 2011-32913, 
76 FR 80355), is cancelled. The next regular meeting will be held on 
February 16, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reinhard Knerr, Deputy Designated 
Federal Officer, Department of Energy Paducah Site Office, Post Office 
Box 1410, MS-103, Paducah, Kentucky 42001; Phone: (270) 441-6825.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on January 12, 2012.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-831 Filed 1-12-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6405-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.1








SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarter Report of   China Changjing Mining & New Energy Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q, for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date: April 20, 2013
Name:
/s/ Chen WeidongTitle:
Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)Date: April 20, 2013
Name:
/s/ Li PingTitle:
Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of China Changjiang Mining & New Energy Co., Ltd. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9371 

To take certain lands in the State of Washington into trust for the benefit 

of the Quinault Indian Nation, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 16, 2024 

Mr. KILMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To take certain lands in the State of Washington into trust 

for the benefit of the Quinault Indian Nation, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Quinault Indian Na5 tion Land Transfer Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LANDS TO BE TRANSFERRED. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to valid existing rights, 

8 the approximately 72 acres located in the State of Wash9 ington and generally depicted as ‘‘Allotment 1157’’ on the 

10 map entitled ‘‘Quinault Indian Nation Land Transfer 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9371 IH

1 Act’’ and dated February 02, 2024, shall be administra2 tively transferred from the United States Forest Service, 

3 Department of Agriculture, to the United States Depart4 ment of the Interior for the land which shall be taken into 

5 trust for the benefit of the Quinault Indian Nation. 

6 (b) LANDS PART OF RESERVATION; ADMINISTRA7 TION.—The land taken into trust by subsection (a) is— 

8 (1) hereby declared to be part of the Quinault 

9 Indian Reservation; and 

10 (2) shall be administered by the Secretary of 

11 the Interior in accordance with the laws and regula12 tions generally applicable to property held in trust 

13 by the United States for an Indian Tribe. 

14 (c) GAMING PROHIBITED.—The land taken into trust 

15 under subsection (a) shall not be eligible for gaming under 

16 the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et 

17 seq.). 

18 (d) NO IMPACT ON TREATY RIGHTS.—Nothing in 

19 this Act shall be interpreted as affecting treaty rights 

20 under the Treaty of Olympia. 

21 (e) HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.—For purposes of the 

22 conveyance under subsection (a), the Secretary— 

23 (1) shall meet disclosure requirements for haz24 ardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants 

25 under section 120(h) of the Comprehensive EnvironVerDate Sep 11 2014 16:49 Sep 07, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H9371.IH H9371

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 9371 IH

1 mental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act 

2 of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9620(h)); and 

3 (2) shall not otherwise be required to remediate 

4 or abate those hazardous substances, pollutants, or 

5 contaminants. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

McGladrey & Pullen [LOGO]





                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference of SEDONA Corporation into the
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-74442, 333-63190, 333-38578,
333-34412, 333-31983,333-37678, 333-03719, 333-71457, 333-52973) and
related prospectuses and the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Nos.
333-112772, 333-103153) and the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos.
333-107831, 333-59780) of our report dated February 25, 2005, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of Sedona Corporation included in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.





Bethesda, Maryland
March 31, 2005
Map 2-30: Alternative B

Wind Energy Development Restrictions

Related to Greater Sage Grouse Habitat

0 20 40 60 80

Kilometers

0 20 40 60 80

Miles

1

LUP Amendments Planning Area

Boundary

BLM Field Office Boundaries

Forest Service Planning Unit

Boundaries

Sage Grouse Priority Habitat

Management Area (Core)

Sage Grouse Priority Habitat

Management Area (Connectivity)

Wind Energy Exclusion Area

BLM and USFS Surface

Management

County Boundaries

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Final Environmental Impact Statement - May 2015

W Y O M I N G

M T

I D

M A P A R E A

Crook

Weston

Sundance

Rock Springs

Field Office

§ ̈¦80

U T

C O

N E

S D

Newcastle

Lusk

Douglas

Casper

Cheyenne

Wheatland Torrington

Laramie

Rawlins

Rock Springs

Green River

Evanston

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Rawlins Field Offi ce

Casper Field Offi ce

Newcastle

Field Office

Pinedale

Field Office

Kemmerer

Field Office

Bridger -

Teton

N.F.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine Bow

N.F.

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

Platte

G

o

s

h

e

n

Alb

a

n

y

L

a

r

a

mie

C

o

n

v

e

r

s

e

Nio

b

r

a

r

a

Nat rona

Carbon

S

w

e

etw

ate

r

C

a

r

b

o

n

Sublette

Lincoln

T

eto

n

Fr

e

m

o

nt

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Note: Identified restrictions displayed on this map

are in addition to existing restrictions already

approved through previous planning efforts.
#### SCHIECK v. DONOHUE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 10, 1905.)

Action by August Schieck against Annie Donohue. No opinion. Motion denied, on payment of $20 costs.
### §20946. Status of Boards and members for purposes of claims against Board

#### (a) In general

The provisions of chapters 161 and 171 of title 28 shall apply with respect to the liability of the Standards Board, the Board of Advisors, and their members for acts or omissions performed pursuant to and in the course of the duties and responsibilities of the Board.

#### (b) Exception for criminal acts and other willful conduct

Subsection (a) may not be construed to limit personal liability for criminal acts or omissions, willful or malicious misconduct, acts or omissions for private gain, or any other act or omission outside the scope of the service of a member of the Standards Board or the Board of Advisors.

(Pub. L. 107–252, title II, §216, Oct. 29, 2002, 116 Stat. 1681.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 15346 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
Exhibit 10.12




 




AMENDMENT No. 1


To
META GROUP, INC.


NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT




 




This Amendment No. 1 (“Amendment”) is entered into as of

July 31, 2002 (the “Amendment Effective Date”) between HOWARD RUBIN, an individual residing at 450 Long Ridge Road, Pound

Ridge, New York 10576 (“Principal”), and META Group, Inc., to amend the NON-COMPETITION

AGREEMENT, dated as of October 27, 2000 (the “Agreement”) between

the parties. Terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the same

meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement.




 




For good and valuable

consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the

Parties hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:




 




1.               The

date in line 2 of Section 2 (a) is modified as follows:




 




“2. (a) For the period commencing on the date hereof and

ending on the later of (i) December 31, 2006 or (ii) twelve (12) months

following the termination of Principal’s employment with Company for any reason

(the “Non-Competition Period”):”




 




The remainder of Section 2 (a) is unchanged.




 




2. A new subsection (c) is

added at the end of Section 2 (b) as follows:




 




2. (c)

Principal agrees to avoid using for business communication any personal email

and is required to use META Group’s email and sanctioned business cards during

official META Group business.




 




3. In

Section 11, add the following for an additional copy to Company:




 




and Attention: General Counsel


META Group, Inc.


208 Harbor Drive


Stamford, CT  06912


Fax:  (203) 388-2545




 




4. In the event of any

inconsistency between the terms of this Amendment and the terms of the

Agreement, this Amendment shall take precedence.




 




5. Except as expressly amended

as set forth herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in

accordance with its terms.




 




6. This Amendment may be

executed in several counterparts, all of which taken together shall constitute

one single agreement of the parties.




 




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties

have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized

representatives as of the date first written above.




 




 




	

   


  	

  META GROUP, INC.


  
	

   


  	

   


  
	

   


  	

  By:


  	

  /s/ John A. Piontkowski


  
	

   


  	

   


  	

  Name: John A. Piontkowski


  
	

   


  	

   


  	

  Title: Chief Financial Officer


  
	

   


  	

   


  
	

   


  	

  PRINCIPAL:


  
	

   


  	

  /s/ Howard Rubin


  
	

   


  	

  Howard Rubin
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David A. Conway, Chief Executive Officer of Water Chef, Inc., hereby certify
that the Form 10-KSB of Water Chef, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2005
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Water Chef, Inc.




                                            /s/  David A. Conway
                                            --------------------------------
                                                 David A. Conway, President,
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
Date:  March 22, 2006


These certifications are being furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, shall not be deemed to be filed as part of the periodic
report described herein nor shall they be deemed filed by Water Chef, Inc. for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of the written statements required by Section 906 has been
provided to Water Chef, Inc. and will be retained by Water Chef, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### (A) Sylvia Needleman v. Manufacturers Trust Company et al. (B) In the Matter of Charles I. Garside v. Most Preferred, Inc., et al.

Motion for a stay denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Bergan, JJ.