alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT NO. 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Greene County
Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the annual period ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I, R. Stan Puckett, Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                       /s/ R. Stan Puckett
                                       -----------------------------
                                           R. Stan Puckett
                                           Chairman of the Board and Chief
                                           Executive Officer

Date: March 11, 2005

                                       1
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.1716-3 Applications for permits. An application for a permit required under this section shall be filed with the Coal Mine Safety District Manager and shall contain the following general information: ( a ) Name and address of the company.
( b ) Name and address of the mine.
( c ) Projected mining and ground support plans.
( d ) A mine map showing the locations of the river, stream, lake, or other body of water and its relation to the location of all working places.
( e ) A profile map showing the type of strata and the distance in elevation between the coal bed and the river, stream, lake or other body of water involved. The type of strata shall be determined by core test drill holes as prescribed by the Coal Mine Safety District Manager.
#### POWERS, Respondent, v. STRAUSS et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 24, 1905.)

Action by Ten Eyck Powers against David I-I. Strauss and Leopold Hutter. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
**EXHIBIT 32****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of Double Eagle PetroleumCo. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, each of Stephen H. Hollis, the ChiefExecutive Officer, and Lonnie R. Brock, the Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, herebycertifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief: (1) theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: November 8, 2006                                                        /s/ Stephen H. Hollis   Stephen H. Hollis   Chief Executive Officer                                                      /s/ Lonnie R. Brock   Lonnie R. Brock   Chief Financial Officer
### §41765. Administrative expenses

In carrying out this subchapter, the Secretary shall use funds made available by appropriations to the Department of Transportation for the purpose of administration, in addition to the proceeds of any fees collected under this subchapter, to cover administrative expenses of the Federal credit instrument program under this subchapter.

(Added Pub. L. 106–181, title II, §210(a), Apr. 5, 2000, 114 Stat. 101.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable only to fiscal years beginning after Sept. 30, 1999, see section 3 of Pub. L. 106–181, set out as an Effective Date of 2000 Amendments note under section 106 of this title.
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-30369 22-NOV-2011 12:26 PM
NO. SCWC-30369
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I

STATE OF HAWAI ' I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. JAMES H. PFLUEGER, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(ICA NOS. 30369 and 30419; CR. NO. 08-1-0280)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Nakayama, Acting C.J., Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ., and Circuit Judge Chan, in place of Recktenwald, C.J., recused) Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant James H. Pflueger’s application for writ of certiorari, filed on October 12, 2011, is hereby rejected. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai' i, November 22, 2011. William C. McCorriston, / David J. Minkin, and Becky T. Chestnut / (McCorriston Miller Mukai MacKinnon LLP) for /petitioner/defendantappellant on the / application s/ Paula A. Nakayama s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Derrick H.M. Chan Kimberly Tsumoto Guidry, First Deputy Solicitor General, for respondent/ plaintiff-appellee on the response
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report of Constar International Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Walter S. Sobon, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ WALTER S. SOBON                                 
|Walter S. Sobon                                     
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

May 15, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001060513
<NAME> PARAGON CORPORATE HOLDINGS INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          56,305
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,216
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,215
<INVENTORY>                                     46,472
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               145,952
<PP&E>                                          23,248
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 194,139
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           88,148
<BONDS>                                        115,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                    (28,321)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   194,139
<SALES>                                        174,614
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               174,614
<CGS>                                          129,836
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  129,836
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,658
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,025
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,442)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       131
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,553)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  11,033
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,520)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### WESTCOTT, Appellant, v. FIDELITY & DEPOSIT CO. OF MARYLAND, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 24, 1905.)

Appeal from Trial Term, New York County. Action by Robert E. Westcott against the Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland. From a judgment granting insufficient relief," plaintiff appeals. Affirmed. E. H. Benn, for appellant. Albert B. Boardman, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This case was before this court upon a former appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. 87 App. Div. 497, 84 N. Y. Supp. 731. Upon the new trial the same facts were presented, and the court below followed the decision of this court in directing a verdict for the plaintiff for the sum of $2,348.87, with interest. The plaintiff having, therefore, recovered a judgment for the damages that he has sustained by the breach of the contract to secure the performance of which this bond was given, he was not entitled to a further recovery. It follows that the judgment appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.
§ 77.1603 Trains and locomotives; authorized persons. ( a ) Only authorized persons shall be permitted to ride on trains or locomotives and they shall ride in a safe position.
( b ) Men shall not get on or off moving equipment, except that trainmen may get on or off of slowly moving trains.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Francis De Luca, Respondent, v. Garrett & Co., Inc., et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board which found accident and causal relation in a heart case. On April 15, 1958 claimant went to work and early in the morning while climbing a ladder, slipped, falling to the floor and was struck in the chest “ pretty hard ” by the ladder and immediately thereafter felt chest pains. He left his employment, went home, a doctor was summoned who diagnosed Ms condition as “ acute myocardial, infarction The doctor testified the man was very sick and it was some time before he was able to know what happened but as soon as he was informed of the incident he filed a report which was dated April 30. The plant superintendent of the employer testified that several days after April 15 the son of the claimant came to Mm and reported that when his father was able to speak, he said something about falling. The record as a whole substantiates the happening of the accident. The medical testimony was in dispute but was ample to support the finding that the incident aggravated and was a contributing factor in the myocardial infarction suffered by claimant. The credibility of the witnesses was solely for the decision of the board and having decided the facts in claimant’s favor, there was substantial evidence to support such findings. Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William Watson, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the former Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, rendered May 2, 1962 on his plea of guilty, convicting him of attempted petit larceny, and sentencing him, pursuant to article 7-A of the Correction Law, to an indefinite term in the New York City Penitentiary, not exceeding three years. Judgment affirmed. Defendant, who pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor, contends that the court abused its discretion in sentencing him pursuant to article 7-A of the Correction Law — a sentence which is forbidden for any convicted person who is “mentally or physically incapable of being substantially benefited ” by reformatory treatment (Correction Law, § 203) because (1) his prior criminal record shows that he is not capable of reformation; and (2) the court in fact, although not *in haee verba,*made a finding of incorrigibility. In *People*v. *Gross*(5 N Y 2d 131, 133), the Court of Appeals unanimously approved the views on this subject stated as follows in the minority opinion in *People ex rel. Kern*v. *Silberglitt*(4 N Y 2d 59, 67-68): “ In our opinion, then, the proper rule is that where there is no statement of the sentencing Judge, the sentence is conclusively presumed to be valid. The rule *632is not different where the Trial Judge has made ambiguous or inconsistent statements respecting defendant’s reformability. Where, however, there is an unequivocal ‘ affirmative finding that the offender was incapable of being substantially benefited ’ * * * the imposition of a sentence under article 7-A of the Correction Law is contrary to law.” In our opinion, in the case at bar the record of the proceedings at the imposition of sentence does not reveal an unequivocal, affirmative finding by the sentencing court that the defendant is incapable of being substantially benefited by an indeterminate term in a penitentiary (of. *People*v. *Regina,*15 A D 2d 536, affd. 11 N Y 2d 1047). The fact that defendant has a previous criminal record does not preclude a finding that he is reformable *(People*v. *Tower,*308 N. Y. 123, 135; *People*V. *Bendix,*260 N. Y. 590; *People*v. *La Rue,*266 App. Div. 995). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Babin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### Lenore V. Beaumont, Appellant, v. Jean Beaumont, Respondent, and Twenty-Two Eleven, Inc., Intervenor-Respondent.

Order entered October 11, 1960, purporting to resettle an order entered July 19, 1960 in relation to the cancellation of a notice of pendency, unanimously affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to the intervenor-defendant-respondent. Under the discretionary provisions of section 123 of the Civil Practice Act relating to good faith in the prosecution of an action in which a notice of pendency is filed, there was ample power and justification for the order entered at Special Term. Indeed, plaintiff is fortunate that Special Term did not charge her with the financial consequences imposable under the second paragraph of section 123. (See, also, *Israelson*v. *Bradley,*308 N. Y. 511.) Insofar as any procedural irregularities are concerned plaintiff was not prejudiced because the result was not avoidable. Hence, under section 105 of the Civil Practice Act such irregularities must be disregarded. Concur—-Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens, Eager and Noonan, JJ.
#### § 586.109 When must I notify BOEM if an action has been filed alleging that I am insolvent or bankrupt?

You must notify BOEM within 3-business days after you learn of any action filed alleging that you are insolvent or bankrupt.
§ 77.304 Explosion release vents. Drying chambers, dry-dust collectors, ductwork connecting dryers to dust collectors, and ductwork between dust collectors and discharge stacks shall be protected with explosion release vents which open directly to the outside atmosphere, and all such vents shall be: ( a ) Hinged to prevent dislodgment;
( b ) Designed and constructed to permit checking and testing by manual operation; and
( c ) Equal in size to the cross-sectional area of the collector vortex finder when used to vent dry dust collectors.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             641
<SECURITIES>                                       100
<RECEIVABLES>                                      388
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,620
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,764
<PP&E>                                             254
<DEPRECIATION>                                      93
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,931
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              819
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,931
<SALES>                                          5,515
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                            3,664
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,664
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,446
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (597)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (597)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)
        

</TABLE>
### §101336. Contracts for the management of field employee quarters

Subject to the appropriation of necessary funds in advance, the Secretary may enter into contracts of any duration for the management, repair, and maintenance of field employee quarters. The contract shall contain terms and conditions that the Secretary considers necessary or appropriate to protect the interests of the United States and ensure that necessary quarters are available to field employees.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3128.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 101336 | 16 U.S.C. 17o(10). | Pub. L. 104–333, div. I, title VIII, §814(a)(10), Nov. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 4192. |

Section
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 22, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 83631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28144]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


President's Commission on White House Fellowships Advisory 
Committee: Closed Meeting

AGENCY: President's Commission on White House Fellowships, Office of 
Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The President's Commission on White House Fellowships (PCWHF) 
was established by an Executive Order in 1964. The PCWHF is an advisory 
committee composed of Special Government Employees appointed by the 
President.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth D. Pinkerton, 712 Jackson 
Place NW, Washington, DC 20503, Phone: 202-395-4522.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    The meeting is closed.
    Name of Committee: President's Commission on White House 
Fellowships Mid-Year Meeting.
    Date: January 4-5, 2021.
    Time: 8:00 a.m.-5:30 p.m.
    Place Eisenhower Executive Office Building, 1650 Pennsylvania Ave. 
NW, Washington, DC 20502.
    Agenda: The Commission holds a mid-year meeting to talk with 
current Fellows on how their placements are going and discuss 
preparation for future events.
    President's Commission on White House Fellowships.

Alexys Stanley,
Regulatory Affairs Director.
[FR Doc. 2020-28144 Filed 12-21-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-44-P
### **CHAPTER 3111—PRESERVE AMERICA PROGRAM**

Sec.
311101.
Definitions.
311102.
Establishment.
311103.
Designation of Preserve America Communities.
311104.
Regulations.
311105.
Authorization of appropriations.
§ 875.16 Exclusion of certain noncoal reclamation sites. ( a ) You, the uncertified State or Indian tribe, may not use moneys from the Fund or from prior balance replacement funds provided under § 872.29 of this chapter for the reclamation of sites and areas designated for remedial action under the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978 (42 U.S.C. 7901 *et seq.*) or that have been listed for remedial action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 *et seq.*).
( b ) You, the certified State or Indian tribe, may not reclaim sites and areas designated for remedial action under the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978 (42 U.S.C. 7901 *et seq.*) or that have been listed for remedial action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 *et seq.*) using— ( 1 ) Moneys distributed from the Fund under section 402(g)(1) of the Act.
( 2 ) Prior balance replacement funds distributed to you under section 411(h)(1) of the Act where you are conducting reclamation under the provisions of this part.
( 3 ) Certified in lieu funds distributed to you under section 411(h)(2) of the Act where you are conducting reclamation under the provisions of this part.
[73 FR 67640, Nov. 14, 2008, as amended at 80 FR 6446, Feb. 5, 2015]
### §404o–2. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 404o–2, comprising section 119B of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as section 3058 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9775 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9775

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 5, 2024

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 119 North Anderson Street in Elwood, Indiana, as the ``Officer Noah 
                Jacob Shahnavaz Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OFFICER NOAH JACOB SHAHNAVAZ POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 119 North Anderson Street in Elwood, Indiana, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Officer Noah Jacob Shahnavaz Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Officer 
Noah Jacob Shahnavaz Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 2024.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```