alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Dixie Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 26, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jon A. Faulkner, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/JON A. FAULKNER

Jon A. Faulkner, Chief Financial Officer
Date:    November 4, 2009



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Dixie Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Dixie Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Murray Aaron Appel, an Attorney, Respondent. Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Petitioner.

First Department,

May 16, 1978

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*James D. Porter, Jr.,*for petitioner.

OPINION OF THE COURT

*Per Curiam.*

Respondent was admitted to the Bar in this department on June 23, 1959.

On June 20, 1977, he was charged in a nine-count indictment filed in the United States District Court, District of New Jersey, with various violations of the bankruptcy law. On October 7, 1977 he pleaded guilty to count six of the indictment, charging him with a felony in that he (together with six other defendants and one unindicted coconspirator) "in contemplation of the filing of a bankruptcy proceeding by the bankrupt * * * did knowingly and fraudulently and with intent to defeat the bankruptcy law transfer and cause to be *443transferred property of the bankrupt, to wit, a $6,800 check * * * made payable to the defendant Murray Appel * * * In violation of Title 18, United States Code, sections 152 and 2.” Respondent was fined $2,500 for this offense.

Petitioner Bar Association, proceeding under subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law, has presented to this court a certified copy of the judgment of conviction and, citing *Matter of Chu*(42 NY2d 490), seeks an order striking respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York on the ground that his felony conviction resulted in automatic disbarment.

Respondent has failed to appear or answer the petition.

Accordingly, the petition to strike respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York by reason of said conviction should be granted.

Kupferman, J. P., Lupiano, Birns, Sandler and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York.
### §70906. International Space Station National Laboratory Advisory Committee

(a) Establishment.—Not later than one year after October 15, 2008, the Administrator shall establish under chapter 10 of title 5 a committee to be known as the "International Space Station National Laboratory Advisory Committee" (hereafter in this section referred to as the "Committee").

(b) Membership.—

(1) Composition.—The Committee shall be composed of individuals representing organizations that have formal agreements with the Administration to utilize the United States portion of the International Space Station, including allocations within partner elements.

(2) Chair.—The Administrator shall appoint a chair from among the members of the Committee, who shall serve for a 2-year term.

(c) Duties of the Committee.—

(1) In general.—The Committee shall monitor, assess, and make recommendations regarding effective utilization of the International Space Station as a national laboratory and platform for research.

(2) Annual report.—The Committee shall submit to the Administrator, on an annual basis or more frequently as considered necessary by a majority of the members of the Committee, a report containing the assessments and recommendations required by paragraph (1).

(d) Duration.—The Committee shall exist for the life of the International Space Station.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3438; Pub. L. 117–286, §4(a)(327), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4342.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 70906 | 42 U.S.C. 17752. | Pub. L. 110–422, title VI, §602, Oct. 15, 2008, 122 Stat. 4795. |

Section

In subsection (a), the date "October 15, 2008" is substituted for "the date of enactment of this Act" to reflect the date of enactment of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–422, 122 Stat. 4779).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 117–286 substituted "chapter 10 of title 5" for "the Federal Advisory Committee Act".
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Ananalysis of the atmospheric trajectories of 413 precisely reduced photographicmeteors**
 
PDF: Hi-ResLo-Res
 
SuDoc Number:SI 1.12/2:10/1
Item Number:0909-B (online)
CGP systemNumber:001049657
 
March 19, 2018
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.384 Longwall and shortwall travelways. ( a ) If longwall or shortwall mining systems are used and the two designated escapeways required by § 75.380 are located on the headgate side of the longwall or shortwall, a travelway shall be provided on the tailgate side of that longwall or shortwall. The travelway shall be located to follow the most direct and safe practical route to a designated escapeway.
( b ) The route of travel shall be clearly marked.
( c ) When a roof fall or other blockage occurs that prevents travel in the travelway— ( 1 ) Work shall cease on the longwall or shortwall face;
( 2 ) Miners shall be withdrawn from face areas to a safe area outby the section loading point; and
( 3 ) MSHA shall be notified.
( d ) Work may resume on the longwall or shortwall face after the procedures set out in §§ 75.215 and 75.222 are implemented.
Editorial Note on Part 777
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54947, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 777 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93326-93327, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 777.15 Completeness. An application for a permit to conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations shall be complete and shall include at a minimum— ( a ) For surface mining activities, the information required under parts 778, 779, and 780 of this chapter, and, as applicable to the operation, part 785 of this chapter; and
( b ) For underground mining activities, the information required under parts 778, 783, and 784 of this chapter, and, as applicable to the operation, part 785 of this chapter.
[48 FR 44398, as amended at 81 FR 93327, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54947, Nov. 17, 2017]
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of CHINA CHANGJAING MINGING & NEW ENERGY CO.,LTD (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Chen Weidong, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.





/s/ Chen Weidong


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





November 15, 2010









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Li Ping, of Changjiang mining & new energy company., Ltd, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the report on Form 10-Q of Changjiang mining & new energy company., Ltd for the interim period ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Argentex Mining Corporation.




Name & Title
Date/s/ Li Ping
November 15, 2010Chief Financial Officer
### §3192. Framework for cross-disciplinary education and training

The Director of National Intelligence shall establish an integrated framework that brings together the educational components of the intelligence community in order to promote a more effective and productive intelligence community through cross-disciplinary education and joint training.

(July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title X, §1002, as added Pub. L. 108–458, title I, §1042, Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3679.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 441g–1 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

For Determination by President that section take effect on Apr. 21, 2005, see Memorandum of President of the United States, Apr. 21, 2005, 70 F.R. 23925, set out as a note under section 3001 of this title.

Section effective not later than six months after Dec. 17, 2004, except as otherwise expressly provided, see section 1097(a) of Pub. L. 108–458, set out in an Effective Date of 2004 Amendment; Transition Provisions note under section 3001 of this title.
RE: Requested Materials - Capacity Factor Information RobertJ Wayland to: Higgins, Cortney
11/22/2011 05:14 PM
Cc: Bill Maxwell

Cortney -

Here is the information we provided at proposal. Please not we have not revisited this issue since that time, so this materials does not represent any new information/input.

thanx!

bob

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. Leader, Energy Strategies Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division
Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-1045 Cell: (919) 306-2290 Fax: (919) 541-5450

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

********************************************************* DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

*********************************************************

Baseline_Emissions_Estimates_EPA- HQ-OAR-2009-0234-2986[1].xlsx

Response_to_03_04 _2011_Interag ency_comments_EPA-HQ-OAR-20 09-0234-3003[1].doc

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA
Date: 11/22/2011 03:43 PM Subject: RE: Requested Materials - Capacity Factor InformationHi Bob, Thanks. I've looked through my files and can't find the area source list/sheet -- can you resend?

Thanks,
Cortney

-----Original Message----- From: Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 3:48 PM To: Higgins, Cortney Cc: Maxwell.Bill@epamail.epa.gov Subject: Requested Materials - Capacity Factor Information

Cortney -

This is the first of five emails providing some of the information you requested last week. To try and reduce confusion, I am not resubmitting the area source information because nothing has changed on this issue since the two files we provided at proposal. If you can't find that information, just let me know and I'll resubmit that information to you as well. Call either Bill or me if you have any questions.

thanx!

bob

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. Leader, Energy Strategies Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-1045 Cell: (919) 306-2290 Fax: (919) 541-5450

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

********************************************************* DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

*********************************************************

(See attached file: Oil Boilers_cap factor_102811.xlsx)

(See attached file: Coal_Boilers_cap factor_111711.xlsx)
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.1101-17 Sealing of dry powder chemical systems.

Each dry powder chemical system shall be adequately sealed to protect all components of the system from moisture dust, and dirt.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134764 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134764 

 COA: 277169 

Wayne CC: 95-012837-01 

COREY MANNING, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 17, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s1119 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2007 

 Clerk
# C_2023198EN.01000101.xml

| 6.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11087 – PAI PARTNERS / GEGENBAUER GROUP)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 198/01)

On 11 May 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11087. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11087. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### § 77.902-1 Fail safe ground check circuits; maximum voltage.

The maximum voltage used for ground check circuits under § 77.902 shall not exceed 40 volts.
#### HOLOHAN, Respondent, v. LEVY, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 24, 1905.)

Action by John Holohan against Samuel Levy. E. Ex-chwege, for appellant. W. D. Sporborg, for respondent. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
---

Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of OccuLogix, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Elias Vamvakas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/ Elias VamvakasElias VamvakasChief Executive Officer





Dated:     March 26, 2010
### §104. Tax on motor fuel sold on military or other reservation 1 reports to State taxing authority

(a) All taxes levied by any State, Territory, or the District of Columbia upon, with respect to, or measured by, sales, purchases, storage, or use of gasoline or other motor vehicle fuels may be levied, in the same manner and to the same extent, with respect to such fuels when sold by or through post exchanges, ship stores, ship service stores, commissaries, filling stations, licensed traders, and other similar agencies, located on United States military or other reservations, when such fuels are not for the exclusive use of the United States. Such taxes, so levied, shall be paid to the proper taxing authorities of the State, Territory, or the District of Columbia, within whose borders the reservation affected may be located.

(b) The officer in charge of such reservation shall, on or before the fifteenth day of each month, submit a written statement to the proper taxing authorities of the State, Territory, or the District of Columbia within whose borders the reservation is located, showing the amount of such motor fuel with respect to which taxes are payable under subsection (a) for the preceding month.

(c) As used in this section, the term "Territory" shall include Guam.

(July 30, 1947, ch. 389, 61 Stat. 644; Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 827, 70 Stat. 799.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1956—Subsec. (c) added by act Aug. 1, 1956.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Civil Airports Owned by United States Subject to Sections 104 to 110; Sales or Use Taxes: Fuels for Aircraft or Other Servicing of Aircraft; Landing or Taking Off Charges; Leases

Pub. L. 91–258, title II, §210, May 21, 1970, 84 Stat. 253, provided that:

"(a) Nothing in this title or in any other law of the United States shall prevent the application of sections 104 through 110 of title 4 of the United States Code to civil airports owned by the United States.

"(b) Subsection (a) shall not apply to—

"(1) sales or use taxes in respect of fuels for aircraft or in respect of other servicing of aircraft, or

"(2) taxes, fees, head charges, or other charges in respect of the landing or taking off of aircraft or aircraft passengers or freight.

"(c) In the case of any lease in effect on September 28, 1969, subsection (a) shall not authorize the levy or collection of any tax in respect of any transaction occurring, or any service performed, pursuant to such lease before the expiration of such lease (determined without regard to any renewal or extension of such lease made after September 28, 1969). For purposes of the preceding sentence, the term 'lease' includes a contract."

1 So in original. Probably should be followed by a semicolon.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________ No. 02-50239 Summary Calendar

_______________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DARRELL ANDRE WILBERT, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas U.S.D.C. No. W-99-CR-91-1

_________________________________________________________________ October 21, 2002

Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

Darrell Andre Wilbert, federal prisoner #03001-180, pleaded guilty to possess ion with intent to distribute crack cocaine and was sentenced to 146 months’ imprisonment, five years
supe rvised release, and a $3,000 fine, with payment to begin2

immediately. Wilbert filed the instant “Motion for Fine
Reassessment and Payment Pla n,” asking the district court to establish a payment plan for his $3,000 fine. He alleged that the
Bureau of Prisons (BOP) was requiring him to pay more per month
than he could afford. Wilbert appeals the district court’s denial of this motion.

W ilbert did not challenge the legality of or the imposition of his sentence in his motion in the district court. His motion was limited to a request for the district court to set up a payment plan for his fine. Any other arguments in his brief

are raised for the first time on appeal and will not be addressed.
See United States v . Madkins , 14 F.3d 277, 279 (5th Cir. 1994);
Leverette v. Louisville Ladder Co. , 183 F.3d 339, 342 (5th Cir. 1999). Wilbert’s motion challenged the manner in which the BOP

was administering the Inmate Financial Responsibility Program (IFRP) in his case and asked the district court to set up a payment pla n. His motion did not explicitly attack any action by the sentencing court. Wilbert’s motion is in the nature of a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, and it should have been filed in the district of his incarceration. S ee Pack v. Yusuff , 218 F.3d 448, 451 (5th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, the district cou rt’s order is VACATED and this case is REMANDED with instructions that the district court3

enter an order dismissing Wilbert’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

VACATED and REMANDED
.
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11

- 1346

GREGORY BYERS, on behalf of Nicole Byers ,
Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v.

MARLBORO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT ,
Defendant

– Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. Terry L. Wooten , District Judge. ( 4:10

- cv - 01367

- TLW )

Submitted : August 18, 2011 Decided: August 22, 2011

Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN , Circu it Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Gregory Byers, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Byers appeals the district court ’ s order
accepting the recommendation of t he magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint , filed on behalf
of his daughter . We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Byers v. Mar lboro County Sch. Dist. , No.

4:10

- cv - 01367

- TLW (D.S.C. Mar. 21, 2011) . We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AF FIRMED