alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.1904 Underground diesel fuel tanks and safety cans. ( a ) Diesel fuel tanks used underground shall— ( 1 ) Have steel walls of a minimum 3 ⁄ 16-inch thickness, or walls made of other metal of a thickness that provides equivalent strength;
( 2 ) Be protected from corrosion;
( 3 ) Be of seamless construction or have liquid tight welded seams;
( 4 ) Not leak; and
( 5 ) For stationary tanks in permanent underground diesel fuel storage facilities, be placed on supports constructed of noncombustible material so that the tanks are at least 12 inches above the floor.
( b ) Underground diesel fuel tanks must be provided with— ( 1 ) Devices for emergency venting designed to open at a pressure not to exceed 2.5 psi according to the following— ( i ) Tanks with a capacity greater than 500 gallons must have an emergency venting device whose area is equivalent to a pipe with a nominal inside diameter of 5 inches or greater; and
( ii ) Tanks with a capacity of 500 gallons or less must have an emergency venting device whose area is equivalent to a pipe with a nominal inside diameter of 4 inches or greater.
( 2 ) Tethered or self-closing caps for stationary tanks in permanent underground diesel fuel storage facilities and self-closing caps for diesel fuel tanks on diesel fuel transportation units;
( 3 ) Vents to permit the free discharge of liquid, at least as large as the fill or withdrawal connection, whichever is larger, but not less than 11 ⁄ 4 inch nominal inside diameter;
( 4 ) Liquid tight connections for all tank openings that are— ( i ) Identified by conspicuous markings that specify the function; and
( ii ) Closed when not in use.
( 5 ) Vent pipes that drain toward the tank without sagging and are higher than the fill pipe opening;
( 6 ) Shutoff valves located as close as practicable to the tank shell on each connection through which liquid can normally flow; and
( 7 ) An automatic closing, heat-actuated valve on each withdrawal connection below the liquid level.
( c ) When tanks are provided with openings for manual gauging, liquid tight, tethered or self-closing caps or covers must be provided and must be kept closed when not open for gauging.
( d ) Surfaces of the tank and its associated components must be protected against damage by collision.
( e ) Before being placed in service, tanks and their associated components must be tested for leakage at a pressure equal to the working pressure, except tanks and components connected directly to piping systems, which must be properly designed for the application.
( f ) Safety cans must be: ( 1 ) Limited to a nominal capacity of 5 gallons or less;
( 2 ) Equipped with a flexible or rigid tubular nozzle attached to a valved spout;
( 3 ) Provided with a vent valve designed to open and close simultaneously and automatically with the opening and closing of the pouring valve; and
( 4 ) Designed so that they will safely relieve internal pressure when exposed to fire.
Appeal No. 76-323.

#### Jacento Rosa *et al. v.*John Oliveira.

*Hodosh, Spinella, Hodosh & Angelone, Gerard McGovern DeCelles,*for. plaintiffs.

*John Oliveira,*pro se, for defendant.

The defendant’s motion to reconsider the previous order of this court is denied without prejudice.

The defendant’s motion for extension of time to file his brief is granted and said brief shall be filed on or before April 25, 1977.

Bevilacqua, C. J., not participating.
### 65

10. Tanks

All the tanks emit both VOM and b enzene. The actual VOM emissions are those reported in

the Annual Air Emissions Report for 2012 . The VOM and benzene PTEs were calculated from

the emission factor determined using 2012 emissio n rates and throughputs. The emission factor was then multiplied times the maximum hourly throughput to yield the potential VOM

emissions in p ounds per hour; and then converted to tons per year using 8,760 hours p er year

.

Tank Emissions Summary

Tank

Number Pollutant Actual

Emissions

2012 (lb/yr) 2012

Throughput (10 3 

### gals/yr) Emission

Factor (lbs/10 3



### gals) PTE

(Lb/hr) PTE

(Ton/yr)

Tank #2 VOM 1.58 602 0.0026 0.0052 0.0230

Benzene 0.0015 2. 49 E

- 0 6 4.98E

- 06 2.18E

- 05

Tank #4 VOM 1.73 602 0.0029 0.0057 0.0252

Benzene 0.017 2.82 E

- 0 5 5.65 E

- 0 5 2.47 E

- 0 4

Tank #6 VOM 2.76 3061 0.0009 0.0018 0.0079

Benzene 0.0027 8.82 E

- 0 7 1.76 E

- 06 7.73 E

- 0 6

Tan k #8 VOM 2.81 2461 0.0011 0.0023 0.0100

Benzene 0.0027 1.10 E

- 06 2.19 E

- 0 6 9.61 E

- 0 6

Tank #10 VOM 10.68 500 0.0214 0.0427 0.1871

Benzene 0.0104 2.08 E

- 0 5 4.16 E

- 0 5 1.82 E

- 0 4

Tank #20 VOM 1.12 310 0.0036 0.0072 0.0316

Benzene 0.0011 3.55 E

- 0 6 7.10 E

- 0 6 3 .11E

- 05

Tank #30 VOM 2.33 79 0.0295 0.0590 0.2584

Benzene 0.0023 2.91 E

- 0 5 5.82 E

- 0 5 2.55E

- 0 4

Tank #40 VOM 2.42 657 0.0037 0.0074 0.0323

Benzene 0.0023 3.50 E

- 0 6 7.00 E

- 06 3.07 E

- 05

Tank #50 VOM 0.7650 764 0.0010 0.0020 0.008 8

Benzene 0.0007 9.46 E

- 0 7 1.83 E

- 06 8.03 E

- 0 6

Tank #60 VOM 5.55 950 0.0058 0.0117 0.0512

Benzene 0.0054 5.68 E

- 06 1.14 E

- 05 4.98 E

- 05

Tank #300 VOM 1.90 580 0.0033 0.0066 0.0287

Benzene 0.0018 3.10 E

- 0 6 6.21E

- 06 2.71E

- 05

Tank #302 VOM 11.74 543 0.0216 0.0432 0.1894

Benzene 0.0114 2.10 E

- 05 4.20E

- 05 1.84E

- 04

Tank #304 VOM 2.81 434 0.0065 0.0130 0.0567

Benzene 0.0027 6.22 E

- 0 6 1.24E

- 05 5.45E

- 05

Tank #306 VOM 5.28 466 0.0113 0.0227 0.0993

Benzene 0.0051 1.09 E

- 0 5 2.19E

- 05 9.59E

- 05

Tank #308 VOM 8.99 355 0.0253 0.0506 0.2 218

Benzene 0.0087 2.45 E

- 0 5 4.90E

- 05 2.15E

- 04

Tank #310 VOM 8.27 282 0.0293 0.0587 0.2569
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.800-3 Testing, examination and maintenance of circuit breakers; procedures. ( a ) Circuit breakers and their auxiliary devices protecting underground high-voltage circuits shall be tested and examined at least once each month by a person qualified as provided in § 75.153;
( b ) Tests shall include: ( 1 ) Breaking continuity of the ground check conductor, where ground check monitoring is used; and
( 2 ) Actuating at least two (2) of the auxiliary protective relays.
( c ) Examination shall include visual observation of all components of the circuit breaker and its auxiliary devices, and such repairs or adjustments as are indicated by such tests and examinations shall be carried out immediately.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ATTO GAMPU; CHARLOTTE IRENE

TUUK,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-71779

Agency Nos. A095-310-917

 A095-310-918

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 17, 2012** 

Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Atto Gampu and Charlotte Irene Tuuk, natives and citizens of Indonesia,

petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying

their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

FILED

APR 23 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-71779

§ 1252. We review for an abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to

reopen. Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 988, 992 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny the

petition for review. 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to

reopen as untimely where the motion was filed over four years after the BIA’s final

order, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and petitioners failed to present sufficient

evidence of changed circumstances in Indonesia to qualify for the regulatory

exception to the time limit for filing motions to reopen, see 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 987-89 (9th Cir. 2010) (the

new evidence must be “qualitatively different” from the evidence at the previous

hearing). 

In light of our conclusion, we decline to address petitioners’ contention that

they are members of a disfavored group.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Terra NovaAcquisition Corporation (the ‘‘Company’’) onForm  10-KSB for the period ended December  31,  2005as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the ‘‘Report’’), each of the undersigned, inthe capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operation of theCompany.

|                 |  |        |  |                                                   |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|-----------------|--|--------|--|---------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|
| March  23, 2006 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Vahan Kololian                                |
|            |  |   |  | VahanKololianChairman and Chief Executive Officer |
| March  23, 2006 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Lee W. Chung                                  |
|            |  |   |  | Lee W.ChungChief FinancialOfficer                 |
|                 |

----
file:///J|/SNURS/SNUR%20Batch%20FY10-3/sanitized%20report/sanitized%20engineering%20reports/p090130.sanitized.en2.txt [5/11/2010 1:13:24 PM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 09-0130 Post-Focus Draft Revision 2 4/2/2009 ENGINEER: Prothero \ AH PV (kg/yr): YX Revision Notes / Assessment Overview: Rev 2: Updated both Use releases based on info from phone log 4/2/09 (pending amendment letter). No other changes vs IRER Rev 1. SUBMITTER: Huntsman Corporation
USE: OTHER USES: None found. MSDS: Yes Label: No Gen Eqpt: safety eyewear, personal protective equipment for the body and chemical-resistant, impervious gloves Respirator: properly fitted, air-purifying or air-fed respirator complying with an approved standard Health Effects: causes respiratory tract, eye and skin irritation TLV/PEL: none established

CRSS : Chemical Name: Soybean oil, epoxidized, reaction products with diethanolamine S-H20: Dispersible g/L @ VP: 1.0E-6 torr @ MW: 491.00 %<500 %<1000 Physical State and Misc CRSS Info: Neat: Liquid Mfg: Liquid Proc/Form: NA End Use: Destroyed. The typical low MW of 490.73 g/mol is for the top structure shown on page 1 of chem report. Composition of fatty acids in soybean oil: linoleic (50-6%), oleic (22-34%), palmitic (7-11), linolenic (2-10%), stearic (2-5%), >C18 saturated (1-3%), C16 unsaturated (0-1%) and myristic (0.3%). Submitted Data: vp <1 mm Hg (est); ws <800 g/L at 30°C; Density = 9.14 lbs/gal; Viscosity = 46750 cps at 25°C. Estimated Data (EPI, for the low weight top structure, with mp entered as 20°C): bp = 670°C, vp = 3.3E-17 torr, ws = 2652 mg/L, log P = 1.48. Based on its structure, the PMN substance is expected to be dispersible in water.
Consumer Use: No SAT (concerns) (01/06/2009): Migration to groundwater: Slow PBT rating: P1B1T1file:///J|/SNURS/SNUR%20Batch%20FY10-3/sanitized%20report/sanitized%20engineering%20reports/p090130.sanitized.en2.txt [5/11/2010 1:13:24 PM] Health: 1-2 Dermal, Inhalation, ingestion Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 6ppb)
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1A
NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.
POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: 1) # of workers exposed: 0 >1000? 2) >100 workers with >10 mg/day inhalation exposure: 3) (a) >100 workers w/1 -10 mg/day inh. exp. & >100 days/yr: (b) Routine Dermal Cont: >250 workers & >100 days/yr:

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 09-0130
# C_2023300EN.01000701.xml

| 25.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/7

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2023/C 300/07)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 1.3.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 1.3.2023 – 31.12.2023 |
| Member State | Spain |
| Stock or Group of stocks | RJU/9-C. |
| Species | Undulate ray (Raja undulata) |
| Zone | Union waters of 9 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | – |
| Reference number | 07/TQ194 |

Date and time of closure

1.3.2023

Duration

1.3.2023 – 31.12.2023

Member State

Spain

Stock or Group of stocks

RJU/9-C.

Species

Undulate ray (Raja undulata)

Zone

Union waters of 9

Type(s) of fishing vessels

–

Reference number

07/TQ194

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Clinical Data and Safety Management Center (CDSMC).                    

*Date:*                         January 15, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G41, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Kelly L. Hudspeth, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G41, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-669-5067,                         *kelly.hudspeth@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 15, 2020.

Tyeshia M. Roberson,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2020-27979 Filed 12-17-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GPS Industries, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to GPS Industries, Inc. and
will be retained by GPS Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



      Date: November 20, 2006             By:/s/ ROBERT C. SILZER, SR.
                                          ---------------------------
                                          Robert C. Silzer, Sr.
                                          Chief Executive Officer
                                          (Duly Authorized Officer)
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc., a Delaware
      corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Iain A.
      McCready, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


*/s/
                Iain A. McCready*Iain
                A. McCready
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              August
                14, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<MULTIPLIER>    1

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                      Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                        Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                                   93,519
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                             6,775
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              119,614
<PP&E>                               10,013,935
<DEPRECIATION>                        2,719,923
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        7,418,546
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          78,593
<BONDS>                                       0
<COMMON>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                            7,339,953
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                7,418,546
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            1,391,153
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           947,141
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         444,012
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     444,012
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            444,012
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             39.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                             39.77
<FN>The earnings per share data noted above refers to
net income per limited partnership unit.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### GIRVIN, Respondent, v. BASTIAN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 27, 1903.)

Action by Michael M. Girvin against Joseph Bastian.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

STOVER, J., not voting.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 28, 2009 

s0921 

Order 

 

September 28, 2009 

137716 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137716 

 COA: 276599 

Oakland CC: 2006-207259-FH 

AKILI EUGENE ARMSTRONG, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 16, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, C.J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her opinion in 

People v Idziak, 484 Mich 549 (2009). 

CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal to reconsider People v Idziak, 484 

Mich 549 (2009).