alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 732.1 Scope.

This part sets forth criteria and procedures for decisions to approve or disapprove submissions of State programs and program amendments, including requirements for public participation in the process of approval or disapproval.
Third District Court of Appeal 

State of Florida 

Opinion filed February 27, 2019. 

________________ 

No. 3D18-2389 

Lower Tribunal No. 15-17922 

________________ 

Brigitte Luscar, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

U.S. Bank Trust National Association, etc., 

Appellee. 

 An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Beatrice Butchko, 

Judge. 

 Fleurantin, Francois & Antonin and Larry R. Fleurantin, for appellant. 

 Phelan Hallinan Diamond & Jones and Jonathan Blackmore (Fort 

Lauderdale), for appellee. 

Before SALTER, SCALES, and MILLER, JJ. 

 PER CURIAM. 
2 

 Based on the confession of error of Appellee U.S. Bank Trust National 

Association, As Trustee, the final foreclosure judgment is vacated and the cause is 

remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.
Prevent Worker Exposure to Coronavirus (COVID-19)

The novel coronavirus (officially called COVID-19) is believed to spread from person-to-person, 

primarily through respiratory droplets produced when an infected person coughs or sneezes. The 

virus is also believed to spread by people touching a surface or object and then touching one’s 

mouth, nose, or possibly the eyes.

Employers and workers should follow these general practices to help prevent exposure to coronavirus:

 Frequently wash your hands with soap and water for at least 20 seconds.

 If soap and running water are not available, use an alcohol-based hand rub that contains at least 

60% alcohol.

 Avoid touching your eyes, nose, or mouth with unwashed hands.

 Avoid close contact with people who are sick.

Employers of workers with potential occupational exposures to coronavirus should follow 

these practices:

 Assess the hazards to which workers may be exposed.

 Evaluate the risk of exposure.

 Select, implement, and ensure workers use controls to prevent exposure, including physical 

barriers to control the spread of the virus; social distancing; and appropriate personal protective 

equipment, hygiene, and cleaning supplies.

For the latest information on the symptoms, prevention, and treatment of coronavirus, visit the 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention coronavirus webpage. 

For interim guidance and other resources on protecting workers from coronavirus, visit OSHA’s 

COVID-19 webpage.

OSHA issues alerts to draw attention to 

worker safety and health issues and solutions.

 • osha.gov/covid-19 • 1-800-321-OSHA (6742) • @OSHA_DOL

OSHA 3989-03 2020
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.1712-1 Availability of surface bathing facilities; change rooms; and sanitary facilities.

Except where a waiver has been granted pursuant to the provisions of § 75.1712-4, each operator of an underground coal mine shall on and after December 30, 1970, provide bathing facilities, clothing change rooms, and sanitary facilities, as hereinafter prescribed, for the use of the miners at the mine.
### §903. Relief of settlers on lands granted in aid of wagon roads

The provision of section 888 of this title and all statutes amendatory thereof or supplementary thereto, including sections 894 to 899 of this title, as modified or supplemented by sections 900 to 902 of this title, shall apply to grants of land in aid of the construction of wagon roads.

(July 1, 1902, ch. 1386, 32 Stat. 733.)
#### § 57.11026 Protection for inclined fixed ladders.

Fixed ladders 70 degrees to 90 degrees from the horizontal and 30 feet or more in length shall have backguards, cages or equivalent protection, starting at a point not more than seven feet from the bottom of the ladders.
### §3528. Compensation and professional standards for certain medical officers

#### (a) Office of Medical Services

There is in the Agency an Office of Medical Services.

#### (b) Compensation

Beginning not later than 1 year after March 15, 2022, each medical officer of the Office of Medical Services who meets the qualifications under subsection (c) shall be compensated during a pay period pursuant to a pay range that is equal to the pay range published in the Federal Register pursuant to section 7431(e)(1)(C) of title 38 (for the corresponding pay period), for a physician in the Veterans Health Administration in the District of Columbia region with a medical subspecialty that is the equivalent of the medical subspecialty of the officer.

#### (c) Clinical practice qualifications

A medical officer meets the qualifications under this subsection if the officer provides direct care services to patients in connection with the official duties of the officer and—

(1) maintains current, active, full, and unrestricted licensure or registration as a physician from a State, the District of Columbia, or a commonwealth or territory of the United States;

(2) holds active board certification and maintains accreditation in an American Board of Medical Specialties direct care clinical specialty; and

(3) except as provided in subsection (d), maintains a minimum of 96 hours per year of clinical practice in an accredited clinic or hospital facility that is not affiliated with the Central Intelligence Agency.

#### (d) Exception for overseas service

If a medical officer is a medical officer located in a duty station outside of the United States pursuant to a permanent change of station and greater than 50 percent of the official duties of the officer in such duty station involve direct patient care, the officer, in lieu of performing the minimum hours under subsection (c)(3) on an annual basis, may count up to 480 hours of clinical practice performed as specified in such subsection prior to such change of station, to fulfill in advance the requirement under such subsection for up to 3 years.

#### (e) Clinical practice hours

The head of the Office of Medical Services shall make available to medical officers excused absence time to allow for the maintenance of clinical practice hours in accordance with subsection (c)(3).

(June 20, 1949, ch. 227, §27, as added Pub. L. 117–103, div. X, title VI, §601, Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 991.)
§ 7.5 Issuance of approval. ( a ) An applicant shall not advertise or otherwise represent a product as approved until MSHA has issued the applicant an approval.
( b ) MSHA will issue an approval or a notice of the reasons for denying approval after reviewing the application, and the results of product testing, when applicable. An approval will identify the documents upon which the approval is based.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.
JOSE LEWIS BOSQUEZ , Petitioner

. No. 1 CA

- CR 22

- 0 360 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2010

- 013094

- 001 The Honorable Roy C. Whitehead , Judge
REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL Maricopa County Attorney ’ s Office , Phoenix By Julie A. Done, Kirsten Valenzuela Counsel for Respondent Zhivago Law , Phoenix By Kerri M. Droban Zhivago Counsel for Petitioner FILED 2-6-2024STATE v. BOSQUEZ Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Andrew M. Jacobs , Judge Jennifer M. Perkins , and Judge David D. Weinzweig delivered the following decision.

PER CURIAM :
¶1 Petitioner Jose Bosquez seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Proce dure 32.1. This is Bosquez’s third petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- c onviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is the petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ari z. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (Ap p. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).
¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, the petition for review , and response . We find t he petit ioner has not established an abuse of discretion.
¶4 We grant review but deny relief.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         694,330
<SECURITIES>                                   716,775
<RECEIVABLES>                                  156,427
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,567,523
<PP&E>                                          77,413
<DEPRECIATION>                                  58,984
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,176,707
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          838,563
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       417,886
<OTHER-SE>                                     139,841
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,176,707
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  228,606
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (496,934)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,413
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                250,475
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            250,475
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   256,475
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1411-A
Thickness and lithology of the Paradox-Eagle Valley subunit—PLATE 14

USGS "ARTMENT HE INTERI
<= B.S SDEP, OFT OF Geldon, A.L, 2002, Geology of Paleozoic rocks in the Upper Colorado River Basin in
science fora changing world U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Arizona, Coldrado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming, excluding the San Juan Basin

MOFFAT TRAIL 110°
LIMESTONE MEMBER OF
AMSDEN FORMATION

EXPLANATION

M2 Area where Paradox-Eagle Valley subunit is missing because of erosion
or nondeposition

° Borehole with lithologic log used to prepare map

+ Measured surface stratigraphic section used to prepare map

Stratigraphic Nomenclature and Thickness

es] Area where Paradox-Eagle Valley subunit crops out (generalized)

—100— Line of equal thickness—Interval is 100 feet, except in centers of depositional
areas of Eagle Valley Evaporite and Paradox Member of Hermosa Formation,
where interval is 1,000 feet. Interval is variable south of Craig, Colorado. Small
salt diapirs in the Paradox basin, where thicknesses reach 15,000 feet, are not
shown because of scale

ew
Flaming Gorge
Reservoir,
aoe

Approximate boundary between component geologic units

Lithology
ee Limestone, dolomite, and shale, with less than 10 percent sandstone and less
than 5 percent anhydrite interbeds
2 E | Limestone, dolomite, sandstone, and shale, with less than 5 percent anhydrite
interbeds

Limestone, dolomite, sandstone, shale, and anhydrite

Limestone, dolomite, shale, and anhydrite, with less than 10 percent sandstone
interbeds

Anhydrite, gypsum, halite, and shale, with less than 25 percent sandstone,
limestone, and dolomite interbeds

EAGLE VALLEY
EVAPORITE

—25— Line of equal percent limestone and dolomite—Interval is 25 percent

———_ Approximate boundary between lithofacies

BOUNDARY OF

BOUNDARY OF
107° UPPER COLORADO UPPER COLORADO
or hi RIVER BASIN RIVER BASIN
foam iF JN ?
pies \ \ Springs g ,

Springs g

— 37°
Navajo Q

Reservoir A

|

} 5) = AREA EXCLUDED FROM STUDY

NO DATA %

AREA EXCLUDED FROM STUDY

or

— 36°

se

111° “CU : 4 4
hoe pal =5= =n...
110° 108° 108°
1:2,000,000 1:2,000,000
0 25 50 75 100 MILES 0) 25 50 75 100 MILES
| I Tf — = f 1 T — :
0 0 25 50 75 100 KILOMETERS

25 50 1) 100 KILOMETERS

STRATIGRAPHIC NOMENCLATURE AND THICKNESS LITHOLOGY

ea STRATIGRAPHIC NOMENCLATURE, THICKNESS, AND LITHOLOGY OF THE PARADOX-EAGLE VALLEY SUBUNIT OF THE FOUR CORNERS CONFINING UNIT
IN THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN AND VICINITY IN ARIZONA, COLORADO, NEW MEXICO, UTAH, AND WYOMING
By
Arthur L. Geldon

Tovavats }
§ 7.4 Product testing. ( a ) All products submitted for approval under this part shall be tested using the test procedures specified in the appropriate subpart unless MSHA determines, upon review of the documentation submitted, that testing is not required. Applicants shall maintain records of test results and procedures for three years.
( b ) Unless otherwise specified in the subpart, test instruments shall be calibrated at least as frequently as, and according to, the instrument manufacturer's specifications, using calibration standards traceable to those set by the National Bureau of Standards, U.S. Department of Commerce or other nationally recognized standards and accurate to at least one significant figure beyond the desired accuracy.
( c ) When MSHA elects to observe product testing, the applicant shall permit an MSHA official to be present at a mutually agreeable date, time, and place.
( d ) MSHA will accept product testing conducted outside the United States where such acceptance is specifically required by international agreement.
[53 FR 23500, June 22, 1988; 53 FR 25569, July 7, 1988; 60 FR 33722, June 29, 1995]
EXHIBIT 10.106**AMENDED LOAN AGREEMENT****Between****SEDONA Corporation****and****William W. Rucks, IV**     **THIS Amendment to the LOAN AGREEMENT**dated as of July 5, 2005 (the “Agreement”), executedbetween William W. Rucks, IV, a Louisiana resident (“Investor”), and Sedona Corporation, acorporation organized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (the“Company”) is entered into as of March 6, 2008.     **WHEREAS,**the Investor loaned $1,000,000 to the Company (the “Loans”) evidenced under variousconvertible notes (the “Notes”) dated July 1, 2005 ($250,000); August 1, 2005 ($250,000); andSeptember 29, 2005 ($500,000); and     **WHEREAS,**the Company has made no payments under the Notes to date; and     **WHEREAS**, as an added inducement to Investor to extend the maturity of the Notes to theCompany, the Company agrees to provide to Investor warrants to acquire shares of the Company’scommon stock; and     **WHEREAS**, the Company and the Investor have concurrently entered into amendments to extend thematurity of such Notes;     **NOW, THEREFORE**, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which ishereby acknowledged, the parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows:     Article IV, Section 4.3 Warrants, shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with thefollowing:     **Warrant:**Investor shall be granted one (1) Warrant to purchase 2,777,777 shares of theCompany’s Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.30 per share. The Warrant shall expire fouryears after the date of issuance..     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by theundersigned, thereunto duly authorized, as of the date first set forth above.      SEDONA CORPORATION
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sheldon Varner, Appellant.

[832 NYS2d 818]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Walsh, J.), dated October 21, 2005, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the Supreme Court’s determination as to the duration of the order of protection issued pursuant to CPL 530.13 (4) at the time of sentencing failed to take into account his jail-time credit *(see People v Pettiford,*1 AD3d 466 [2003]). The defendant, however, failed to preserve this contention for appellate review because he did not raise this issue at sentencing or move to amend the final order of protection on this ground *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Nieves,*2 NY3d 310, 316-318 [2004]), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction *(cf. People v Johnson,*16 AD3d 521 [2005]). Miller, J.P., Ritter, Covello and McCarthy, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 779
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54948, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 779 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93327, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 779.4 Responsibilities. ( a ) It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide, except where specifically exempted in this part, all information required by this part in the application.
( b ) It is the responsibility of State and Federal government agencies to provide information for applications as specifically required by this part.
[44 FR 15354, Mar. 13, 1979, as amended at 81 FR 93327, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54948, Nov. 17, 2017]
### §523. Employment of civilian personnel

The Secretary of the Air Force is authorized to employ such civilian personnel as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this subchapter without regard to the limitation on maximum number of employees imposed by section 14(a) 1 of the Federal Employees Pay Act of 1946 (5 U.S.C. 947(g)).

(Oct. 27, 1949, ch. 766, title II, §203, 63 Stat. 937.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 14(a) of the Federal Employees Pay Act of 1946 (5 U.S.C. 947(g)), referred to in text, was repealed by act Sept. 12, 1950, ch. 946, title III, §301(85), 64 Stat. 843.

1 See References in Text note below.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 22, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 83613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28141]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--CHEDE-8

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 15, 2020, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), CHEDE-8 (``CHEDE-8'') has 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. 
The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Caterpillar, Inc., 
Peoria, IL, has been added as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and CHEDE-8 intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On December 4, 2019, CHEDE-8 filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on December 30, 2019 (84 FR 71977).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on October 20, 
2020. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on November 19, 2020 (85 FR 73751).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2020-28141 Filed 12-21-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
VERIZON DELAWARE INC.





EXHIBIT 12





COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES





Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002(Dollars in Thousands)Income before provision for income taxes and extraordinary item

$
86,093Dividends received from equity affiliate


2Interest expense


6,189Portion of rent expense representing interest


3,536Amortization of capitalized interest


327Earnings, as adjusted

$
96,147Fixed charges:Interest expense

$
6,189Portion of rent expense representing interest


3,536Capitalized interest


450Fixed Charges

$
10,175Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges


9.45
**Exhibit32**

**Section 1350 Certifications**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

**(Subsections(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Credit Suisse (USA),Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

1.               theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 of theCompany (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.               theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| November 14, 2006 |   | /s/  Brady W. Dougan      |                                   |
|-------------------|--------|---------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|              |   | Name:                     | Brady W. Dougan                        |
|              |   | Title:                    | President and Chief Executive Officer  |
|              |   |                      |                                   |   |
| November 14, 2006 |   |                      |                                   |   |
|              |   | /s/  Paul J. O’Keefe |                                   |
|              |   | Name:                     | Paul J. O’Keefe                   |
|              |   | Title:                    | Chief Financial and Accounting Officer |

 

----