alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023260EN.01000201.xml

| 24.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11082 – ARP / GRI / JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 260/02)

On 19 July 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11082. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11082. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### (A) Rachel Moore v. Hamilton Estates, Inc., et al. (B) Clara Lenick v. William Lenick.

Motion for leave to dispense with printing denied, *619with $10 costs. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and. McNally, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9600 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9600

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 119 Main Street in Plains, Georgia, as the ``Jimmy and Rosalynn 
                         Carter Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JIMMY AND ROSALYNN CARTER POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 119 Main Street in Plains, Georgia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Jimmy and 
Rosalynn Carter Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 5, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 9600

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 119 Main Street in Plains, Georgia, as the ``Jimmy and Rosalynn 
                         Carter Post Office''.
```
September 17, 2015

Mr. Jacob Cole Haddan

AirVideo Inc

P.O. Box 370746

Denver CO 80237

Dear Mr. Haddan:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

part 21, §§ 45.23(b), 61.3, 91.7(a), 91.9(b)(2), 91.103, 91.109, 91.119, 91.121, 91.151(a),

91.203(a) and (b), 91.205(b), 91.215, 91.405(a), 407(a)(1), 409(a)(2), 417(a) and (b) of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We received your June 7, 2015, exemption request filed in Docket No. FAA−2015−2751, but 

we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does not comply with the 

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must 

send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

RASHAD COLEMAN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3982 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed August 15, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Mary M. Handsel, Judge. Rashad Coleman, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and CASANUEVA and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
#### INNIS v. FRANK.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 6, 1903.)

Action by George A. L. Innis against William P. Frank. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals. From so much of the judgment as permitted a reduction to the extent of defendant’s counterclaim, and from an order denying a new trial on the counterclaim, plaintiff appeals. From the judgment, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appeals. Reversed.

Nichols & Bacon (Morton Stern, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Steuer & Hoffman (Max D. Steuer, of counsel), for defendant.

PER CURIAM.

This action was brought by the plaintiff, as a traveling salesman, to recover about $1,700, as balance of commissions due him, and the sum of $75, loaned to defendant by plaintiff. The answer Contained a general denial, alleged a defense of payment, and set up as a counterclaim an assigned claim from the firm of Remick, Ryall & Co. to defendant for money loaned and advanced to plaintiff, and for the price of a suit of clothes furnished to plaintiff bjr said firm. At the trial both parties gave evidence. By consent of counsel three questions were sutftnitted to the jury, and upon the answers giveii to such questions the court concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to the direction of a verdict in the sum of $691.33, with interest, over and above the amount due on defendant’s counterclaim. The case presents numerous motions of both parties for the direction. of a verdict for various amounts, but it nowhere appears with certainty how the amount of $691.33 was arrived at, or how much was allowed for defendant’s counterclaim. By the printed case it appears that defendant’s counsel asked for a direction to the jury “that they must deduct from the claim found to1 be due plaintiff from the defendant $283.63, with interest from the 1st day of October, 1901,” and that the court said “I make that direction.” But when thereafter the case was submitted to the jury, they were required only to answer three questions, and their answers specified no amount. The extract from tbe minutes contains the following: “At the close of the entire case, upon motion of defendant’s counsel, the court directed a verdict for the defendant on the counterclaims for $240.70.” How that sum was arrived at, or for what it was intended to stand, it nowhere appears. The case as settled and printed presents such a confused statement as to what was really done, and as to the real and precise disposition of the issues, that no intelligent disposition of the appeals can be made; and, as both parties are dissatisfied with the verdict as directed and have appealed, the interests of justice and of orderly practice will be best promoted by ordering a new trial. Judgment and order appealed from reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs of this appeal to the party finally prevailing to abide the event.
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS
I, R. W. Lane, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of John Deere Capital Corporation;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:****
Exhibit No. 32.6   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with this report of Questar Gas Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Kevin W. Hadlock, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  QUESTAR GAS COMPANY   February 28, 2011 /s/Kevin W. Hadlock Kevin W. Hadlock Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Map 2-4: Alternative A

Oil and Gas Leasing Restrictions Related to

Greater Sage Grouse Habitat

0 20 40 60 80

Kilometers

0 20 40 60 80

Miles

1

LUP Amendments Planning Area

Boundary

BLM Field Office Boundaries

Forest Service Planning Unit

Boundaries

Sage Grouse Priority Habitat

Management Area (Core)

Sage Grouse Priority Habitat

Management Area (Connectivity)

Closed to Oil & Gas Leasing

No Surface Occupancy

Controlled Surface Use

Federal Oil and Gas Estate

County Boundaries

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Final Environmental Impact Statement - May 2015

W Y O M I N G

M T

I D

M A P A R E A

Crook

Weston

Sundance

Rock Springs

Field Office

§ ̈¦80

U T

C O

N E

S D

Newcastle

Lusk

Douglas

Casper

Cheyenne

Wheatland Torrington

Laramie

Rawlins

Rock Springs

Green River

Evanston

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Rawlins Field Offi ce

Casper Field Offi ce

Newcastle

Field Office

Pinedale

Field Office

Kemmerer

Field Office

Bridger -

Teton

N.F.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine Bow

N.F.

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

Platte

G

o

s

h

e

n

Alb

a

n

y

L

a

r

a

mie

C

o

n

v

e

r

s

e

Nio

b

r

a

r

a

Nat rona

Carbon

S

w

e

etw

ate

r

C

a

r

b

o

n

Sublette

Lincoln

T

eto

n

Fr

e

m

o

nt

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Note: Identified restrictions (NSO & CSU) displayed

on this map are in addition to existing restrictions already

approved through previous planning efforts. Lands closed

to leasing are displayed across Greater Sage Grouse core

and connectivity habitat only. Additional closures exist

beyond the boundaries of core and

connectivity habitat.
### §101332. General authority of Secretary

(a) Rental Housing.—To enhance the ability of the Secretary, acting through the Director, to effectively manage System units, the Secretary may where necessary and justified—

(1) make available employee housing, on or off land under the administrative jurisdiction of the Service; and

(2) rent that housing to field employees at rates based on the reasonable value of the housing in accordance with requirements applicable under section 5911 of title 5.

(b) Joint Development Authority.—The Secretary may use authorities granted by statute in combination with one another in the furtherance of providing where necessary and justified affordable field employee housing.

(c) Construction Limitations on Federal Land.—The Secretary may not utilize any land for the purposes of providing field employee housing under this subchapter that will affect a primary resource value of the area or adversely affect the mission of the Service.

(d) Rental Rates.—To the extent practicable, the Secretary shall establish rental rates for all quarters occupied by field employees of the Service that are based on the reasonable value of the quarters in accordance with requirements applicable under section 5911 of title 5.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3126.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 101332(a) | 16 U.S.C. 17o(2). | Pub. L. 104–333, div. I, title VIII, §814(a)(2), (17)(A), (B), Nov. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 4190, 4193. |
| 101332(b) | 16 U.S.C. 17o(9). | Pub. L. 104–333, div. I, title VIII, §814(a)(9), Nov. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 4191; Pub. L. 106–176, title I, §120(a)(1)(C), Mar. 10, 2000, 114 Stat. 28. |
| 101332(c) | 16 U.S.C. 17o(17)(A). | |
| 101332(d) | 16 U.S.C. 17o(17)(B). | |

Section

In subsection (a)(2), the words "or lease" are omitted to distinguish between leasing property and renting employee housing.
#### Lanvin Parfums, Inc. v. Le Dans, Ltd., et al.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellants procure the appellants’ points to be served and filed on or before October 4, 1960, with notice of argument for the November 1960 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

U.S.C. Section 1350,

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Devcon International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Mark C. McIntosh, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|Date: August 19, 2008                       
|                                            
|/s/ Mark M. McIntosh                        
|Mark M. McIntosh                            
|Chief Financial Officer                     
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Dixie Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 1, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) that he is the Chief Financial Officer of the Company and that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



/s/GARY A. HARMONGary A. Harmon, Chief Financial Officer
Date: May 9, 2006





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Dixie Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Dixie Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
(September 26, 1963)

#### A. Cohen *&*Sons Corp., Appellant, v. Nathaniel Ratner et al., Defendants, and Anap Corporation et al., Respondents. Anap Corporation et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. R. & R. Construction Corp. et al., Third-Party Defendants.

Order, entered on July 18, 1963, unanimously modified on the law and on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondents, to provide that plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed, with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within 20 days after service of copy of the order herein with notice of entry. The complaint, as a whole, is vague and indefinite, and the allegations are such that one is not able to ascertain whether or not the plaintiff is attempting to plead more than one cause of action. Under rule 3014 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules it is still the requirement that every “pleading shall consist of plain and concise statements ”, and that “ Separate causes of action * * * shall be separately stated and numbered ”. If the plaintiff intends to plead only a single declaratory judgment cause, with a demand merely for incidental or consequential relief, there has been a failure to set forth, with reasonable clearness, the nature and the bases of the alleged controversies between the parties, claimed to be justiciable. (See 22 Carmody-Wait, Declaratory Judgments, §§ 29-32; *Garment Center Capital*v. *Bentner,*77 N. Y. S. 2d 17.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
### **CHAPTER 301—FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGNS**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—DISCLOSURE OF FEDERAL CAMPAIGN FUNDS

Sec.
30101.
Definitions.
30102.
Organization of political committees.
30103.
Registration of political committees.
30104.
Reporting requirements.
30105.
Reports on convention financing.
30106.
Federal Election Commission.
30107.
Powers of Commission.
30108.
Advisory opinions.
30109.
Enforcement.
30110.
Judicial review.
30111.
Administrative provisions.
30112.
Maintenance of website of election reports.
30113.
Statements filed with State officers; "appropriate State" defined; duties of State officers; waiver of duplicate filing requirement for States with electronic access.
30114.
Use of contributed amounts for certain purposes.
30115.
Authorization of appropriations.
30116.
Limitations on contributions and expenditures.
30117.
Modification of certain limits for House candidates in response to personal fund expenditures of opponents.
30118.
Contributions or expenditures by national banks, corporations, or labor organizations.
30119.
Contributions by Government contractors.
30120.
Publication and distribution of statements and solicitations.
30121.
Contributions and donations by foreign nationals.
30122.
Contributions in name of another prohibited.
30123.
Limitation on contribution of currency.
30124.
Fraudulent misrepresentation of campaign authority.
30125.
Soft money of political parties.
30126.
Prohibition of contributions by minors.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—GENERAL PROVISIONS

30141.
Extension of credit by regulated industries; regulations.
30142.
Prohibition against use of certain Federal funds for election activities.
30143.
State laws affected.
30144.
Partial invalidity.
30145.
Period of limitations.
30146.
Collection and use of conference fees.
Map 3-21: Vegetation Communities

0 20 40 60 80

Kilometers

0 20 40 60 80

Miles

1

LUP Amendments Planning Area

BLM Field Office Boundaries

Forest Service Planning Unit Boundaries

County Boundaries

Vegetation Zones

Agriculture/Urban

Barren Land

Forests

Grasslands

Sand

Shrublands

Wetland/Riparian

Woodlands

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Final Environmental Impact Statement - May 2015

W Y O M I N G

M T

I D

M A P A R E A

Crook

Weston

Sundance

Rock Springs

Field Office

§ ̈¦80

U T

C O

N E

S D

Newcastle

Lusk

Douglas

Casper

Cheyenne

Wheatland Torrington

Laramie

Rawlins

Rock Springs

Green River

Evanston

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Rawlins Field Offi ce

Casper Field Offi ce

Newcastle

Field Office

Pinedale

Field Office

Kemmerer

Field Office

Bridger -

Teton

N.F.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine Bow

N.F.

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

Platte

G

o

s

h

e

n

Alb

a

n

y

L

a

r

a

mie

C

o

n

v

e

r

s

e

Nio

b

r

a

r

a

Nat rona

Carbon

S

w

e

etw

ate

r

C

a

r

b

o

n

Sublette

Lincoln

T

eto

n

Fr

e

m

o

nt

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments
§ 77.901 Protection of low- and medium-voltage three-phase circuits. ( a ) Low- and medium-voltage circuits supplying power to portable or mobile three-phase alternating equipment shall contain: ( 1 ) Either a direct or derived neutral grounded through a suitable resistor at the power source;
( 2 ) A grounding circuit originating at the grounded side of the grounding resistor which extends along with the power conductors and serves as a grounding conductor for the frames of all the electric equipment supplied power from the circuit.
( b ) Grounding resistors, where required, shall be of an ohmic value which limits the ground fault current to no more than 25 amperes. Such grounding resistors shall be rated for maximum fault current continuously and provide insulation from ground for a voltage equal to the phase-to-phase voltage of the system.
( c ) Low- and medium-voltage circuits supplying power to three-phase alternating current stationary electric equipment shall comply with the National Electric Code.