alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Devcon International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen J. Ruzika, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                              
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2006 |  | /s/ Stephen J. Ruzika        
|                      |  | Stephen J. Ruzika            
|                      |  | President and CEO            
|                      |  | (Principal Executive Officer)

Note: This certification is being furnished, not filed, as exhibit 32.1
#### § 723.11 How assessments are made.

The Office shall review each notice of violation and cessation order in accordance with the assessment procedures described in §§ 723.12, 723.13, 723.14, 723.15, and 723.16 to determine whether a civil penalty will be assessed, the amount of the penalty, and whether each day of a continuing violation will be deemed a separate violation for purposes of the total penalty assessed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

Commission on Civil Rights.

# ACTION:

Notice; cancellation of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Commission on Civil Rights published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         concerning a meeting of the South Carolina Advisory Committee. The meeting scheduled for Wednesday, December 16, 2020 at 12:00 p.m. (EST) is cancelled. The notice is in the                         **Federal Register**                         of Tuesday, December 1, 2020, in FR Doc. 2020-26428, on page 77145.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Barbara Delaviez, (202) 618-4158,                         *bdelaviez@usccr.gov*.                    

Dated: December 14, 2020.

David Mussatt,

Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit.

[FR Doc. 2020-27864 Filed 12-17-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
----

|  | 1. | the      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the company for the annual period ended      December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on      the date hereof (the “report”) fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      company. |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | 3/11/09 |   |  /s/ Robert J.    Schoonover          |   |
|--------|---------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |    |   | President      and Chief Executive Officer |   |

----
#### § 56.15006 Protective equipment and clothing for hazards and irritants.

Special protective equipment and special protective clothing shall be provided, maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition and used whenever hazards of process or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants are encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 671 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9749 

[Report No. 118–820] 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to abolish the reorganization 

authority of the Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 

Mr. BISHOP of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

DECEMBER 5, 2024 

Additional sponsor: Mr. GREEN of Tennessee 

DECEMBER 5, 2024 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9749 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to abolish 

the reorganization authority of the Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 9749 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ABOLITION OF REORGANIZATION AUTHORITY 

4 OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECU5 RITY. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title VIII of the Homeland Secu7 rity Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 361 et seq.) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking section 857 (6 U.S.C. 427); 

9 (2) by redesignating section 858 (6 U.S.C. 428) 

10 as section 857; 

11 (3) by striking section 872 (6 U.S.C. 452); and 

12 (4) by striking section 881 (6 U.S.C. 461). 

13 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—The Homeland 

14 Security Act of 2002 is amended— 

15 (1) in section 506 (6 U.S.C. 316)— 

16 (A) by striking subsection (b); and 

17 (B) by redesignating subsections (c) and 

18 (d) as subsections (b) and (c), respectively; and 

19 (2) in section 702(b) (6 U.S.C. 342(b)), by 

20 striking paragraph (4). 

21 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—The table of contents 

22 in section 1(b) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 is 

23 amended— 

24 (1) by striking the items relating to sections 

25 857 and 858 and inserting the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 857. Identification of new entrants into the Federal marketplace.’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
4 

•HR 9749 RH

1 (2) by striking the items relating to sections 

2 872 and 881. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Union Calendar No. 671 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9749 

[Report No. 118–820] 

A BILL 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to 

purposes. partment of Homeland Security, and for other abolish the reorganization authority of the DeDECEMBER 5, 2024 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7293

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHARLETTE DUFRAY JOHNSON, a/k/a Charlotte Johnson,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. W. Earl Britt, 

Senior District Judge. (7:10-cr-00093-BR-1; 7:12-cv-00209-BR)

Submitted: September 21, 2012 Decided: October 12, 2012

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charlette Dufray Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. MayParker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Charlette Dufray Johnson seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing without prejudice her 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion. The order is not appealable 

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate 

of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Johnson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.*

 We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

 * Because Johnson’s § 2255 motion was dismissed without 

prejudice as premature, she is not precluded from filing a 

timely § 2255 motion after her convictions and sentence become 

final.
#### § 57.22212 Air flow (I-C, II-A, and V-A mines).

Air flow across each working face shall be sufficient to carry away any accumulation of methane, smoke, fumes, and dust.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Strikes in the United States, 1880-1936

              																	Peterson, Florence, 1894-					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Strikes in the United States, 1880-1936 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 651*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. G.P.O., 										August 1937,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4164,			accessed on August 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Order entered December 6, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00951-CV

DOUGLAS D. BOX, Appellant

V.

PETROTEL OMAN LLC, PETROTEL OMAN ONSHORE LLC, AND 

PETROTEL OMAN OFFSHORE LLC, Appellees

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366-01697-2021

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s December 2, 2021 unopposed motion for a 

fourteen-day extension of time to file his brief. We GRANT the motion and 

ORDER the brief be filed no later than December 20, 2021.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
Exhibit 11

            DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                
        Consolidated Computation of Net Income Per Common
                   And Common Equivalent Share


For the Three Months Ended:                           June 30, 1997
                                                      -------------
                                                                   
Net Income                                               $1,133,234
 Less:  amortization of redeemable stock                     11,984
                                                          ---------
Adjusted net income applicable to common stock           $1,145,218
                                                          =========
                                                                   
Number of Shares                                                   
Weighted average number of shares                         4,508,453
Common Stock equivalent due to assumed exercise                    
  of stock options and warrants and deferred                       
  compensation plan shares                                  602,866
                                                          ---------
                                                          5,111,319
                                                          =========
                                                                   
Net Income per Common and Common Equivalent share             $0.22
                                                               ====
#### § 57.14212 Chains, ropes, and drive belts.

Chains, ropes, and drive belts shall be guided mechanically onto moving pulleys, sprockets, or drums except where equipment is designed specifically for hand feeding.
----

| (1)   | The Report      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:       August 11, 2008 | /s/ John M.      Lowber          |
|----------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                             | John M.      Lowber              |
|                             | Chief      Financial Officer     |
|                             | General      Communication, Inc. |

----
Mark B. Goldstein, P.A. 

ATTORNEY AT LAW 

April 9, 2015 

RECEIVED 

APR 14 20!5 

HEARING DOCKET 

VIA U.S. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

600 INDEPENDENCE A VENUE SW 

WILBUR WRIGHT BUILDING, SUITE 2Wl 000 

WASHINGTON, DC 20591 

ATTENTION HEARING DOCKET CLERK, AGC 430 

Re: 2014S0190149-Professional Flight Transport, Inc. 

Gentlemen: 

We represent Professional Flight Transport, Inc. 

Request is hereby made for a hearing concerning the above-referenced matter. 

If yon should have any questions or comments concerning the foregoing, please feel free to contact 

me so that we may discuss same. 

MBG:agw 

Cc: Deitrick Johnson, Esquire (via electronic mail) 

Client (via electronic mail) 

2700 N. MILITARY TRAIL, SUITE 130 • BocA RATON, FLORIDA 33431 • TELEPHONE (561) 989-9955 • FACSIMILE (561) 989-9966 

mbg@bizavlaw.com • www.bizavlaw.com
§ 77.1901 Preshift and onshift inspections; reports. ( a ) Examinations of slope and shaft areas shall be made by a certified person for hazardous conditions, including tests for methane and oxygen deficiency: ( 1 ) Within 90 minutes before each shift;
( 2 ) At least once on any shift during which men are employed inside any slope or shaft during development; and
( 3 ) Both before and after blasting.
( b ) The surface area surrounding each slope and shaft shall be inspected by a certified person and all hazards in the vicinity shall be corrected before men are permitted to enter the excavation.
( c ) All hazards found during any preshift or onshift inspection shall be corrected before men are allowed to enter, or continue to work in such slope or shaft. If hazardous conditions cannot be corrected, or excessive methane concentrations cannot be diluted, the excavation shall be vacated and no person shall be permitted to reenter the slope or shaft to continue excavation operations until the hazardous condition has been abated.
( d ) No work shall be performed in any slope or shaft, no drilling equipment shall be started, and no electrical equipment shall be energized if the methane content in such slope or shaft is 1.0 volume per centum, or more.
( e ) Nothing in this § 77.1901 shall prevent the specific assignment of men in the slope or shaft for purposes of abating excessive methane concentrations or any other hazardous condition.
( f ) The results of all inspections conducted in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section shall be recorded in a book approved by the Secretary.
(Pub. L. No. 96-511, 94 Stat. 2812 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*))
[36 FR 9364, May 22, 1971, as amended at 60 FR 33723, June 29, 1995]
#### Herman Goldfarb et al., Respondents, v. Hewlett Gardens, Inc., Appellant.

In an action to recover moneys paid on a contract for the purchase and sale of real estate and for the erection of a dwelling thereon, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 14, 1960, as denies its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
259.7008
### §4563. Separability

If any provision of this chapter or the application of such provision to any person or circumstances shall be held invalid, the remainder of the chapter, and the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid, shall not be affected thereby.

(Sept. 8, 1950, ch. 932, title VII, §715, formerly §714, 64 Stat. 821; renumbered §715, July 31, 1951, ch. 275, title I, §110(b), 65 Stat. 144.)

#### Termination of Section

For termination of section, see section 4564(a) of this title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter and the chapter, referred to in text, were in the original "this Act" and "the Act", respectively, meaning act Sept. 8, 1950, ch. 932, 64 Stat. 798, known as the Defense Production Act of 1950, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 4501 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 2164 of the former Appendix to this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
### [§§721 to 724. Renumbered §§1321 to 1324]
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.423 What are the requirements for casing and liner installation? You must ensure proper installation of casing in the subsea wellhead or liner in the liner hanger. ( a ) You must ensure that the latching mechanisms or lock down mechanisms are engaged upon successfully installing the casing string.
( b ) If you run a liner that has a latching mechanism or lock down mechanism, you must ensure that the latching mechanisms or lock down mechanisms are engaged upon successfully installing the liner.
( c ) You must perform a pressure test on the casing seal assembly to ensure proper installation of casing or liner. You must perform this test for the intermediate and production casing strings or liners. ( 1 ) You must submit for approval with your APD, test procedures and criteria for a successful test.
( 2 ) You must document all your test results and make them available to BSEE upon request.
[81 FR 26019, Apr. 29, 2016, as amended at 84 FR 21974, May 15, 2019]
#### William Robyn, Respondent, v. Geraldine H. Williams, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

-In an action to foreclose a consolidated mortgage on certain real property, the defendant Geraldine Hinds Williams appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 24, 1962, which: (a) granted plaintiff’s motion to direct, her to attorn and to account to the receiver theretofore appointed in the action; (b) denied her cross motion to dismiss the action or, in the alternative, to open her default in answering the *658complaint; and (c) *inter alla,*directed her to turn over possession of the premises to the receiver. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. On March 25, 1960 plaintiff commenced the instant action, based upon the said defendant’s nonpayment of an installment of principal and interest, taxes, etc. In lieu of obtaining the appointment of a receiver, the parties, before answer, entered into a stipulation whereby the said defendant executed an assignment of rents which was to remain in full force until payment in full shall have been made of all sums due and to become due under the mortgage. The assignment further provided: (a) that upon default by the said defendant thereunder, plaintiff should have the right to proceed in the action “without any notice whatsoever” to her; (b) that upon payment in full, the assignment was to be returned and delivered to her and “ the within action shall thereupon be discontinued”; and (c) that the assignment was to be “without prejudice to any and all rights which the plaintiff may have under the aforesaid mortgage as consolidated.” Plaintiff, upon the said defendant’s default, obtained an ex parte order appointing a receiver, and thereafter moved to compel her to attorn to the receiver with respect to rents received by her in violation of the order. The defendant cross-moved, as above indicated, and on this appeal contends that the stipulation settled the action and, hence, the plaintiff was not entitled to proceed without notice. In view of the provisions of the stipulation and said defendant’s default in making the agreed payments, plaintiff was justified in proceeding in the action without further notice to her. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.