alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9562 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9562

To require the inclusion of an authorization of appropriations for the 
Department of Veterans Affairs in any authorization for use of military 
                      force or declaration of war.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 2024

 Mr. Deluzio (for himself and Mr. Lieu) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the inclusion of an authorization of appropriations for the 
Department of Veterans Affairs in any authorization for use of military 
                      force or declaration of war.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Full Cost of War Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR AUTHORIZATIONS FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE AND 
              DECLARATIONS OF WAR.

    Any authorization for the use of military force or declaration of 
war enacted after the date of the enactment of this Act shall include 
an authorization of appropriations for the Department of Veterans 
Affairs for such sums as may be necessary to provide veterans with 
medical care, disability compensation, and any other earned benefit 
needed as a result of any activity conducted pursuant to such 
authorization or declaration, as jointly determined by the Secretary of 
Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
                                 <all>
```
### Preliminary correlation of post-Erie interstadial events (16,000-10,000 radiocarbon years before present), central and eastern Great Lakes region, and Hudson, Champlain, and St. Lawrence Lowlands, United States and Canada

By: David S. Fullerton

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1089

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
, J.

725 (2012) ("[I]t is mandatory to name all parties of record in a petition for judicial review of an administrative decision, and a district court lacks jurisdiction to consider a petition that fails to comply with this requirement."). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Gibbons

PICKERING, J., dissenting:

I agree with appellant that Washoe County v. Otto, 128 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 40, 282 P.3d 719 (2012), is distinguishable from the facts here because in Otto, the respondent taxpayers were not identified by name in the caption or body of the petition for judicial review or in an attached exhibit to the petition. Id. at 723. Here, by attaching the appeals officer's order to the petition, appellant clearly identified the proper parties to the judicial review proceedings. I believe that this is sufficient to meet the requirements of NRS 233B.130(2)(a), which requires that "the agency and all parties of record to the administrative proceeding" be named as respondents, but does not specifically require that the parties be named in the caption to the petition. See Cooksey v. Cargill Meat ,Solutions Corp., 831 N.W.2d 94, 103-04 (Iowa 2013) (concluding that in evaluating the statutory naming requirement, "the contents of a petition seeking review of an administrative action should be evaluated in its entirety" and that identifying the respondents in the body of the petition

SUPREME COURT OF 2
NEVADA

(0) 194Th (904.4and serving respondents with notice satisfies the requirement). It appears

that appellant served the petition on respondents and, although appellant also did not expressly name the respondents in the body of the petition, the appeals officer's order that identified the parties to the administrative proceeding, attached as an exhibit, is incorporated as part of the petition. See Green v. Iowa Dep't of Job Serv., 299 N.W.2d 651, 654 (Iowa 1980) (concluding that naming the employer in an exhibit attached to a petition for judicial review meets the statutory naming requirement); cf. NRCP 10(c) (incorporating an exhibit to a pleading as part of the pleading for all purposes). Therefore, I disagree with the majority that the language of
Otto should be read so broadly so as to encompass the factual circumstances at issue here, and I respectfully dissent. 

# Attar ' , J. Pickering

cc: Hon. Kerry Louise Earley, District Judge Persi J. Mishel, Settlement Judge Law Offices of Michael P. Balaban Dept. of Business and Industry/Div. of Industrial Relations/Henderson Greenman, Goldberg, Raby & Martinez Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 3

(0) 1947A 794161197
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 11

STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF DILUTED COMMON EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
(In thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                          Years Ended December 31,
                                                   -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           2000                    1999                     1998
                                                   ---------------------    --------------------    ----------------------
<S>                                                              <C>                     <C>                       <C>
Weighted average number of shares                                12,288                  12,014                    12,039
Net effect of dilutive stock options and
    warrants based on the treasury stock
    method (1)                                                       --                      --                        --
                                                  ---------------------    --------------------    ----------------------
Weighted average number of common shares
     and common stock equivalents                                12,288                  12,014                    12,039
                                                  ---------------------    --------------------    ----------------------
Net loss                                                       ($14,419)                ($1,693)                 ($17,448)
Common stock dividend to preferred
    shareholders (2)                                                 --                      --                        (1)
                                                  ---------------------    --------------------    ----------------------
Net loss to common stockholders                                ($14,419)                ($1,693)                 ($17,449)
                                                  =====================    ====================    ======================
Diluted loss per share amount (3)                                ($1.17)                 ($0.14)                   ($1.45)
                                                  =====================    ====================    ======================
</TABLE>


(1)  Stock options and warrants are excluded from the weighted average number of
     common shares due to their anti-dilutive effect.

(2)  In December 2000, 1999, and, 1998, the Board of Directors approved a Common
     Stock dividend of 183, 183, and 293 shares to the stockholders of record of
     Series A Convertible Preferred Stock as of December 15, 2000, 1999, and
     1998 that was paid January 2001, 2000, and 1999 respectively. The market
     value of the common stock distributed was approximately $34, $297 and
     $1,000 at December 15, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.

(3)  The assumed conversion of the preferred stock would have an immaterial
     effect (less than 1/10 of $.01) in all periods, and therefore that
     calculation has been omitted.
# C_2023202EN.01003201.xml

| 9.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/32

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2023/C 202/07)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 18.05.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 18.05.2023 - 31.12.2023 |
| Member State | Portugal |
| Stock or Group of stocks | JAX/08C. (including special condition JAX/*09.) |
| Species | Horse mackerel (Trachurus spp.) |
| Zone | 8c |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 01/TQ194 |

Date and time of closure

18.05.2023

Duration

18.05.2023 - 31.12.2023

Member State

Portugal

Stock or Group of stocks

JAX/08C. (including special condition JAX/*09.)

Species

Horse mackerel (Trachurus spp.)

Zone

8c

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

01/TQ194

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---
#### § 965.403 Funding.

The cost to change mastermeter systems to individual metering of resident consumption, including the costs of benefit/cost analysis and complete installation of checkmeters, shall be funded from operating funds of the PHA to the extent feasible. When sufficient operating funds are not available for this purpose, such costs are eligible for inclusion in a modernization project or for funding from any available development funds.
**EXHIBIT No. 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Form S-8 Registration Statements Number333-08609, 333-115054 and 333-117791, and the Form S-3 RegistrationStatement Number 333-115975, of Greene County Bancshares, Inc. of ourreport dated January 16, 2004 on the consolidated financial statements ofGreene County Bancshares, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003as included in the registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K.

 

 
|                 |   | /s/ Crowe Chizek  and Company LLC |   |
|----------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|                 |
| Oak Brook,  Illinois |
| March 10,  2006 |

 

----
### §404c. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 404c, comprising section 1457 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991, Pub. L. 101–510, was editorially reclassified as section 3310 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 784
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54958, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 784 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93355, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 784.10 Information collection. ( a ) The collections of information contained in part 784 have been approved by Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* and assigned clearance number 1029-0039. The information will be used to meet the requirements of 30 U.S.C. 1211(b), 1251, 1257, 1258, 1266, and 1309a. The obligation to respond is required to obtain a benefit.
( b ) Public reporting burden for this information is estimated to average 513 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.
[79 FR 76229, Dec. 22, 2014, as amended at 81 FR 93355, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54958, Nov. 17, 2017]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT 

_____________________

No. 14-20128

_____________________

JUAN RAMON TORRES; EUGENE ROBISON, 

Plaintiffs - Appellees

v.

S.G.E. MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.; STREAM GAS & ELECTRIC, L.T.D.; 

STREAM S.P.E. G.P., L.L.C; STREAM S.P.E., L.T.D.; IGNITE HOLDINGS, 

L.T.D; ET AL, 

Defendants – Appellants

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas, Houston

__________________________

(Opinion October 16, 2015, 5 Cir., 2015, 805 F.3d 145)

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, JOLLY, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DENNIS, 

CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK, HAYNES, GRAVES, 

HIGGINSON and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for 

rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active 

service and not disqualified having voted in favor, 

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc 

with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a 

briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 12, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk
#### James Francis HILL, Appellant, v. Dr. Ivan W. STEELE, Warden, United States Medical Center, Springfield, Missouri.

No. 14866.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

March 2, 1954.

Edward D. Weakley, St. Louis, Mo., for appellant.

Edward L. Scheufler, U. S. Atty., Kansas City, Mo., and O. J. Taylor, Asst. U. S. Atty., Springfield, Mo., for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court dismissed and case remanded with directions to dismiss, upon memorandum of counsel for appellee suggesting question of mootness.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-91,199-01

EX PARTE PEDRO CASTILLO, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. D-1-DC-20-202515 IN THE 331ST DISTRICT COURT

FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant has filed a motion for leave to file an Application for an Original Writ of Habeas

Corpus. Applicant’s motion for leave to file is denied. 

Applicant sought pretrial release on a personal bond through a writ of habeas corpus filed in

the district court. The district court denied habeas relief and refused release on a personal bond. In

his original habeas application to this Court, Applicant challenges the trial court’s denial. Because

Applicant may challenge the trial court’s denial in the appropriate intermediate appellate court,

Applicant has an adequate remedy at law. See, e.g., Ex parte Groves, 571 S.W.2d 888 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1978); Jones v. State, 803 S.W.2d 712 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).

Filed: April 27, 2020

Do not publish
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 32.1


                                  Certification
              Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
       2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
                             18, United States Code)

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Gristede's Foods, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

      The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended February
29, 2004 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:      May 14, 2004                      /s/ John A. Catsimatidis
                                              --------------------------------
                                        Name: John A. Catsimatidis
                                              Chairman and
                                              Chief Executive Officer


Dated:      May 14, 2004
                                              /s/ Kishore Lall
                                              --------------------------------
                                        Name: Kishore Lall
                                              Executive Vice President and
                                              Chief Financial Officer


      The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of
Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Gristede's Foods, Inc. and will be retained by Gristede's
Foods, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.







                                       23
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Money Disbursements of Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, 1934-36: Summary Volume

              																	Jones, Alice Hanson, 1904-1985					 and 	Williams, Faith M. (Faith Moors), 1893-. 						*Money Disbursements of Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, 1934-36: Summary Volume : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 638*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. G.P.O., 										1941,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4151,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  North  American  Gaming   and
Entertainment  Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
June 30, 2006 as  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"),  I  E.  H.  Hawes  II, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section  13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)     The  information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial  condition  and  result  of  operations of the
Company.

/s/ E. H. HAWES, II,
--------------------
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

August 17, 2006
#### § 583.325 What is the effective date of an agreement?

The agreement will become effective on the date when all parties to the agreement have signed it.
#### § 880.1 Scope.

Projects for the control or extinguishment of outcrop or underground fires in coal formations under the authority of the Act of August 31, 1954 (30 U.S.C. 551-558); section 205(a)(2) of the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965 (Pub. L. 89-4, 79 Stat. 5), and the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (Pub. L. 102-486).

[59 FR 52377, Oct. 17, 1994]
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AP RIL 23 , 2019

NO. 03

- 19

- 00093

- CV

M. T., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BE FORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BA KER, AND TRIANA

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on January 23, 2019

. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the trial court’s judgment . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. Because

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Editorial Note on Part 816
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54979, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 816 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93392, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 816.101 Backfilling and grading: Time and distance requirements. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, rough backfilling and grading for surface mining activities shall be completed according to one of the following schedules: ( 1 ) Contour mining. Within 60 days or 1,500 linear feet following coal removal;
( 2 ) Area mining. Within 180 days following coal removal, and not more than four spoil ridges behind the pit being worked, the spoil from the active pit constituting the first ridge; or
( 3 ) Other surface mining methods. In accordance with the schedule established by the regulatory authority. For States with approved State programs, schedules are subject to the State program approval process.
( b ) The regulatory authority may extend the time allowed for rough backfilling and grading for the entire permit area or for a specified portion of the permit area if the permittee demonstrates in accordance with § 780.18(b)(3) of this chapter that additional time is necessary.
[56 FR 65635, Dec. 17, 1991, as amended at 81 FR 93392, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54979, Nov. 17, 2017] Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 57 FR 33875, July 31, 1992, § 816.101 was suspended indefinitely, effective Aug. 31, 1992.