alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,451,564
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,707,471
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  8,325,309
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,069,152
<PP&E>                                       8,225,370
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,984,825
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,625,147
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,521,902
<BONDS>                                      4,619,066
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        51,351
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,457,557
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,625,147
<SALES>                                     33,019,331
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,168,780
<CGS>                                       28,716,910
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               28,716,910
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,134,001
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             459,621
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                861,248
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (564,271)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,425,519
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,425,519
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24
<FN>
<F1>Accounts receivable are net of allowance of $54,000 at December 31, 1997.
<F2>Inventories are net of reserve of $223,000 at December 31, 1997.
</FN>


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7299

MAURICE PATRICK FORTUNE, III,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

MARK R. HERRING,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District 

Judge. (1:16-cv-00586-LO-TCB)

Submitted: February 22, 2017 Decided: February 28, 2017

Before KING, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Maurice Patrick Fortune, III, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Maurice Patrick Fortune seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Fortune has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, deny the motion for a transcript at government 

expense and for a stay, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 
3

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2023244EN.01000401.xml

| 11.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/4

---

Notice for the attention of certain persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(2023/C 244/02)

The following information is brought to the attention of Valeriy Mikhailovich PAKHNITS (No. 1384) and Andrey Alexandrovich SPIVAK (No. 1420), persons appearing in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1) and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (2) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.

The Council is considering maintaining the restrictive measures against the above-mentioned persons with new statements of reasons. Those persons are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the intended statements of reasons for their designation, by 18 July 2023, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1 |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

---

(1)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

(2)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

---
(December 26, 1978)

#### Mildred Britt, Appellant, v Barbara Gilden et al., Respondents.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered April 28, 1976, which is in her favor, upon a jury verdict. Judgment reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion, and new trial granted upon the issue of damages only, with costs to abide the event, unless within 30 days after entry of the order to be made hereon, defendants shall serve and file in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to increase the verdict in favor of plaintiff to $2,500, and to the entry of an amended judgment accordingly, in which event the judgment, as so increased and amended, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The damages awarded were inadequate to the extent indicated herein. Martuscello, J. P., Titone, Shapiro and O'Connor, JJ., concur.
#### Kenneth Polverari et al. *v.*William T. Peatt, Jr., et al.

*Alan R. Spirer,*in support of the petition.

*Louis Ciccarello*and *Walter G. Ryba,*in opposition.

Decided October 30, 1992

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 191, is denied.
#### § 77.705 Guy wires; grounding.

Guy wires from poles supporting high-voltage transmission lines shall be securely connected to the system ground or be provided with insulators installed near the pole end.
No. 7812.

#### The Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co. *v.*The City of Lima.

(Decided September 29, 1903.)

. Error to Circuit Court of Allen county.

*Mr. R. D. Marshall; Mr. I. R. Longsworth*and *Mr. A: McL. Marshall,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Wheeler <& Bentley*and *Mr. D. 0. Henderson,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Burket, C. J., Davis and Crew, JJ., concur.
§ 44.52 Revocation of modification. ( a ) *Petition for revocation.* Any party to a proceeding under this part in which a petition for modification of a mandatory safety standard was granted by an Administrator, administratior law judge, or the Assistant Secretary may petition that the modification be revoked. Such petition shall be filed with the Chief Administrative Law Judge for disposition.
( b ) *Revocation by the Administrator.* The appropriate Administrator may propose to revoke a modification previously granted by the Administrator, an administrative law judge, or the Assistant Secretary, by issuing a proposed decision and order revoking the modification. Such proposed revocation and a statement of reasons supporting the proposal must be served upon all parties to the proceeding, and shall become final on the 30th day after service thereof unless a hearing is requested in accordance with § 44.14.
( c ) Revocation of a granted modification must be based upon a change in circumstances or because findings which originally supported the modification are no longer valid.
( d ) Disposition of the revocation shall be subject to all procedures of subparts C through E of this part.
[55 FR 53443, Dec. 28, 1990]
##### 



LIFECORE BIOMEDICAL, INC.
 1996 STOCK PLAN, AS AMENDED




---



##### 



TABLE OF CONTENTS
 SECTION 1.
    
    GENERAL PURPOSE OF PLAN; DEFINITIONS
    
    
    1SECTION 2.
    
    ADMINISTRATION
    
    
    3SECTION 3.
    
    STOCK SUBJECT TO PLAN
    
    
    4SECTION 4.
    
    ELIGIBILITY
    
    
    4SECTION 5.
    
    STOCK OPTIONS
    
    
    5SECTION 6.
    
    STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS
    
    
    8SECTION 7.
    
    RESTRICTED STOCK
    
    
    9SECTION 8.
    
    DEFERRED STOCK AWARDS
    
    
    11SECTION 9.
    
    TRANSFER, LEAVE OF ABSENCE, ETC.
    
    
    12SECTION 10.
    
    AMENDMENTS AND TERMINATION
    
    
    12SECTION 11.
    
    UNFUNDED STATUS OF PLAN
    
    
    13SECTION 12.
    
    GENERAL PROVISIONS
    
    
    13
 i




---



##### 



LIFECORE BIOMEDICAL, INC.
1996 STOCK PLAN
             1




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



4




---



##### 



5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



7




---



##### 



8




---



##### 



9




---



##### 



10




---



##### 



11




---



##### 



12




---



##### 



13




---



##### 



14
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         744,044
<SECURITIES>                                   125,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               21,094,506
<ALLOWANCES>                               (3,265,946)
<INVENTORY>                                  7,647,230
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            28,330,752
<PP&E>                                      88,691,507
<DEPRECIATION>                            (38,511,995)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              97,635,416
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,909,210
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       449,894      
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,064,133
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                97,635,416
<SALES>                                     49,625,771
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            49,625,771
<CGS>                                       39,865,704
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               39,865,704
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            14,199,298
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                75,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,960,484
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,845,246)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   120,355
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,965,601)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,965,601)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.30)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2023072EN.01004201.xml

| 28.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/42

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 72/06)

Decision granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2023) 1078 | 21 February 2023 | 4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated (‘4-tert-OPnEO’)
  EC No.-; CAS No.- | Yposkesi, 26 rue Henri Auguste-Desbruères, 91100 Corbeil-Essonnes, France | REACH/23/4/0 | For its non-ionic detergent properties for the cell membrane lysis and viral clearance during the development and manufacturing of viral vectors in medicinal products dedicated to human use (Investigational and Authorized Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product) | 4 January 2028 | In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies. |

Reference of the decision (2)

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2023) 1078

21 February 2023

4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated (‘4-tert-OPnEO’)

EC No.-; CAS No.-

Yposkesi, 26 rue Henri Auguste-Desbruères, 91100 Corbeil-Essonnes, France

REACH/23/4/0

For its non-ionic detergent properties for the cell membrane lysis and viral clearance during the development and manufacturing of viral vectors in medicinal products dedicated to human use (Investigational and Authorized Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product)

4 January 2028

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu).

---
### §60606. Space weather knowledge transfer and information exchange

Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of the PROSWIFT Act, the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, in collaboration with the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the Director of the National Science Foundation, shall enter into an arrangement with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to establish a Space Weather Government-Academic-Commercial Roundtable to facilitate communication and knowledge transfer among Government participants in the space weather interagency working group established under section 60601(c), the academic community, and the commercial space weather sector to—

(1) facilitate advances in space weather prediction and forecasting;

(2) increase coordination of space weather research to operations and operations to research; and

(3) improve preparedness for potential space weather phenomena.

(Pub. L. 116–181, §2(b), Oct. 21, 2020, 134 Stat. 891.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of enactment of the PROSWIFT Act, referred to in text, is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 116–181, which was approved Oct. 21, 2020.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.26
                                                           [DETROIT EDISON LOGO]



April 6, 1998



Ms. Lynne Halpin
21109 Brush Road
Los Gatos, California  95033


Dear Lynne:

Pursuant to approval by the Board of Directors, I am pleased to offer you
employment in the position of Vice President and Chief Information Officer at
an annual salary of $215,000.

Upon employment, you will be eligible for the benefits described in the Benefit
Highlights brochure enclosed, as well as the perquisites described on a
separate listing also enclosed.  In addition, you will receive the following:

  -   You will receive an immediate annual benefit of three (3) weeks vacation
      for 1998.

  -   You will be paid an amount (considered imputed income to be grossed up
      for taxes) to cover the premium for three (3) months health care coverage
      under the Company's plan.

  -   You will receive a signing bonus of $35,000.

  -   You will be eligible for relocation assistance that will include interim
      living for 45 days, moving your household goods, assistance in selling
      your home, and you will receive $18,000 to offset your living expenses
      (all to be grossed up for taxes).

Subject to the approval of the Special Committee on Compensation of the Board
of Directors, you will be granted the following shares of stock pursuant to our
Long-Term Incentive Plan:       

  -   2,000 shares of restricted stock (without performance measures) with a
      vesting period of four (4) years from the date of grant.

  -   10,000 shares of nonqualified stock options (25 percent of the shares
      vest annually from the date of grant).




















<PAGE>   2
Ms. Lynne Halpin
April 6, 1998
Page 2



This offer is subject to successful completion of a pre-employment physical
examination, a review of references, and completion of our employment history
form.

Please contact me at (313) 235-8610 after you have completed your review of
this offer of employment.  I hope to hear from you soon.


                                            Sincerely,

                                            Sandea J. Miller    



/smh
Attachments






ACCEPTED:






/s/ Lynne Halpin             4/7/98
-----------------------------------
Lynne Halpin                   Date
# C_2023305EN.01000201.xml

| 29.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11126 – TOWERBROOK / LOV GROUP / ELOCGA / THE INDEPENDENTS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 305/02)

On 15 June 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11126. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11126. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### § 77.1432 Initial measurement.

After initial rope stretch but before visible wear occurs, the rope diameter of newly installed wire ropes shall be measured at least once in every third interval of active length and the measurements averaged to establish a baseline for subsequent measurements. A record of the measurements and the date shall be made by the person taking the measurements. This record shall be retained until the rope is retired from service.

[48 FR 53241, Nov. 25, 1983, as amended at 60 FR 33723, June 29, 1995]
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION

III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

P 2 Ms. Cecily M. Beau, Associate Director Air Quality Division District Department

of the Environment 1200

1 st Street, NE,

5 th Floor Washington,
DC 20002 Dear Ms. Beau: On June
3, 2010, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) revised theheathbased National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)
for sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) by establishing a new 1-hour standard

at a level of 75 parts per billion (ppb). This new 1-hour standard will protect public health by reducing people’s exposure

to high short-term (5-minutes

to 24-hours) concentrations

of SO 2 . An area meets the new standard when the 3-year average
of the 99 percentile

of 1-hour daily maximum concentrations
does not exceed
75 ppb. Section 107(d)(l)
of the Clean Air Act (CAA) describes the process EPA follows for designating areas as meeting

or not meeting

a new or revised NAAQS. Within one year of establishing

a new or revised standard, each governor must recommend

a designation

of attainment, nonattainment

or unclassifiable, with appropriate boundaries,
for areas within their jurisdiction. Therefore,
we ask that your state provide designation recommendations, including appropriate area boundaries,

for all areas by June
3, 2011, with respect
to the 1-hour SO 2 NAAQS. The enclosed memorandum provides guidance

to state and local air pollution control agencies and tribes on the timeline and process for designating areas under the revised SO 2 standard. We plan to announce our intended designations

no later than 120 days prior to promulgating

final designations. Following
the announcement

of intended designations, states and tribes will have the opportunity

to comment

on any modifications EPA proposes

to their recommendations.
EPA intends

to complete designations

by no later than June
3, 2012. 0 Printed
oji 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post-consumer fiber and process chlorine free. Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474EstablishingareadesignationsisakeystepintheprocessofprovidingthehealthprotectionintendedbytheCAA.Ifyouhaveanyquestions,pleasedonothesitatetocontactmeorhaveyourstaffcontactMs.IreneShandrukat(215)814-2166orMs.RuthKnappat(215)814-2191.Sincerely,DianaEsher,DirectorAirProtectionDivisionEnclosurecc:Mr.RamaTangirala,Chief,MonitoringandAssessmentBranchAirQualityDivision,DCDepartmentoftheEnvironment0Printedoil100%recycled/recyclablepaperwith100%post-consumerfiberandprocesschlorinefree.CustomerServiceHotline:1-800-438-2474