alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION** Exhibit 31-18I, David E. Meador, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 of TheDetroit Edison Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. (Intentionally omitted)  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   /s/ DAVID E. MEADOR Date: August 4, 2005   David E. Meador  Executive Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer of The Detroit Edison Company
§ 77.215-3 Refuse piles: certification. ( a ) Within 180 days following written notification by the District Manager that a refuse pile can present a hazard, the person owning, operating, or controlling the refuse pile shall submit to the District Manager a certification by a registered engineer that the refuse pile is being constructed or has been modified in accordance with current, prudent engineering practices to minimize the probability of impounding water and failure of such magnitude as to endanger the lives of miners.
( b ) After the initial certification required by this section and until the District Manager notifies the operator that the hazard has been eliminated, certification shall be submitted every twelfth month from the date of the initial certification.
( c ) Certifications required by paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section shall include all information considered in making the certification.
(Secs. 101, 508, Pub. L. 91-173, 83 Stat. 745, 803 (30 U.S.C. 811, 957))
[40 FR 41776, Sept. 9, 1975, as amended at 57 FR 7471, Mar. 2, 1992]
#### Paul R. Jernigan, Respondent, v Louis F. Pandolfo, Appellant.

In an action on a promissory note, commenced pursuant to CPLR 3213, defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered November 18, 1977, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and (2) the judgment of the same court, dated December 1, 1977, entered thereon. Judgment and order reversed, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements to cover both appeals, and motion denied. In the light of the conflicting statements by the plaintiff and his son contained in affidavits submitted in support of the motion, the motion should have been denied. Latham, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
C. A. No. 76-123.

#### State *v.*Milton C. Massey III.

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *Judith Romney Wegner,*Special Asst. Attorney General, for petitioner.

*Allegra E. Munson, Public Defender,*for defendant.

The State’s motion for an extension of time to file its brief is granted. The brief shall be filed on or before July 29, 1977.
#### (A) Clara Frank, Individually and as Guardian ad Litem of Leonard Frank, an Infant, Appellant, v. Kiamesha Concord Inc., Respondent. (B) Edward J. Lisecki, Appellant, v. County Hardware Corp. et al., Respondents. (C) In the Matter of Fred S. Darrow et al., Appellants, v. Murray Weston, Respondent.

Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur. Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur—[In each action] Motion by respondent to dismiss appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
#### § 58.1 Scope.

The health standards in this part apply to all metal and nonmetal mines.
§ 585.436 Can BOEM require lease or grant contraction? At an interval no more frequent than every 5 years, BOEM may review your lease or grant area to determine whether the lease or grant area is larger than needed to develop the project and manage activities in a manner that is consistent with the provisions of this part. BOEM will notify you of our proposal to contract the lease or grant area. ( a ) BOEM will give you the opportunity to present orally or in writing information demonstrating that you need the area in question to manage lease or grant activities consistent with this part.
( b ) Prior to taking action to contract the lease or grant area, BOEM will issue a decision addressing your contentions that the area is needed.
( c ) You may appeal this decision under § 585.118.
#### § 902.1 Scope.

This part contains all rules applicable only within Alaska that have been adopted under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977.

[48 FR 12889, Mar. 23, 1983]
EXHIBIT 99.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

     Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  each of
the undersigned  officers of Brilliant Digital  Entertainment,  Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the  "Company"),  does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly
Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-QSB Report") that:

     (1)  the 10-QSB  Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.





Date:  November 14, 2002                       /s/ KEVIN BERMEISTER
                                               --------------------
                                                  Kevin Bermeister
                                                  President and
                                                  Chief Executive Officer






Date:  November 14, 2002                       /s/ ROBERT CHMIEL
                                               -----------------
                                                  Robert Chmiel
                                                  Chief Financial Officer and
                                                  Chief Operating Officer
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 6, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 704]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28145]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Proposed Collection; Form 15227

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice; supplement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The IRS published a document in the Federal Register on 
September 8, 2020, concerning requests for comments on Form 15227. This 
form does not require an Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control 
number, further public comments are not being solicited.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information 
should be directed to Martha R. Brinson, at (202) 317-5753, or at 
Internal Revenue Service, Room 6526, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC 20224, or through the internet at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#236e4251574b420d710d61514a4d504c4d634a51500d444c55"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fcb19d8e88949dd2aed2be8e95928f9392bc958e8fd29b938a">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The IRS published a document at 85 FR 55579 
in the Federal Register of September 8, 2020, concerning requests for 
comments on Form 15227. Under 5 CFR 1320.3(h)(1), the form does not 
require an OMB control number, further public comments are not being 
solicited.

    Approved: December 16, 2020.
Chakinna B. Clemons,
Supervisory Tax Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2020-28145 Filed 1-5-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION



I, Bernard Kravitz certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Dionics, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.





Dated:     July 14, 2008

By:

/s/ Bernard Kravitz

Bernard Kravitz,

Principal Financial Officer
§ 71.209 Status change reports. ( a ) If there is a change in operational status that affects the respirable dust sampling requirements of this part, the operator shall report the change in operational status of the mine or DWP to the MSHA District Office or to any other MSHA office designated by the District Manager. Status changes shall be reported in writing or electronically within 3 working days after the status change has occurred.
( b ) Each specific operational status is defined as follows: ( 1 ) Underground mine: ( i ) Producing—has at least one mechanized mining unit producing material.
( ii ) Nonproducing—no material is being produced.
( iii ) Abandoned—the work of all miners has been terminated and production activity has ceased.
( 2 ) Surface mine: ( i ) Producing—normal activity is occurring and coal is being produced or processed or other material or equipment is being handled or moved.
( ii ) Nonproducing—normal activity is not occurring and coal is not being produced or processed, and other material or equipment is not being handled or moved.
( iii ) Abandoned—the work of all miners has been terminated and all activity has ceased.
( 3 ) DWP: ( i ) Producing—normal activity is occurring.
( ii ) Nonproducing—normal activity is not occurring.
( iii ) Abandoned—the dust generating source has been withdrawn and activity has ceased.
### §4507. Penalties

(a) The owner, charterer, managing operator, agent, master, and individual in charge of a vessel to which this chapter applies which is operated in violation of this chapter or a regulation prescribed under this chapter may each be assessed a civil penalty by the Secretary of not more than $5,000. Any vessel with respect to which a penalty is assessed under this subsection is liable in rem for the penalty.

(b) A person willfully violating this chapter or a regulation prescribed under this chapter shall be fined not more than $5,000, imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.

(Added Pub. L. 100–424, §2(a), Sept. 9, 1988, 102 Stat. 1588.)
(March 16, 1978)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Walter Rodriguez, Appellant.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered January 29, 1975, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted robbery in the first degree (Penal Law, §§ 110.00, 160.15), burglary in the second degree (Penal Law, § 140.25), assault in the second degree (Penal Law, § 120.05) and possession of a weapon as a misdemeanor (Penal Law, § 265.01). On September 30, 1974, defendant moved to dismiss the indictment alleging denial of his right to a speedy trial. This motion was granted to the extent of directing the trial court to conduct a factual hearing prior to trial to determine if there was an unreasonable delay in bringing this indictment to trial. No hearing was ever held and nothing was said respecting this outstanding ruling prior to or at trial. The matter is unanimously remanded to the trial court for a hearing as to the reasons for the adjournments of defendant’s case and whether there was, in fact, a lack of speedy trial. Final determination of this appeal is held in abeyance pending the result of the hearing directed above. Concur —Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Lane and Markewich, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bruce Preister, Appellant.

[832 NYS2d 846]

Appeal from a judgment of the Livingston County Court (Gerard J. Alonzo, Jr., J.), rendered June 30, 2005. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the second degree.

' It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the second degree *1226(Penal Law § 120.05 [2]). To the extent that the contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel survives his plea of guilty *(see People v Breen,*30 AD3d 1044 [2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 785 [2006]; *People v Burke,*256 AD2d 1244 [1998], *lv denied*93 NY2d 851 [1999]), we conclude that it is lacking in merit *(see generally People v Ford,*86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]). Defense counsel engaged in an active defense prior to negotiating the *Alford*plea, which was reasonable in its terms. Contrary to the further contention of defendant, the record establishes that his plea was knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered, and we conclude that County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw his plea *(see generally People v*Seeber, 4 NY3d 780 [2005]). Present—Gorski, J.P., Lunn, Fahey, Green and Pine, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  CHINA CHANGJAING MINGING & NEW ENERGY CO.,LTD (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on  the date hereof (the "Report"), I Chen Weidong,  Chief Executive Officer and  Chief Financial  Officer  of  the  Company,  certify,   pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Chen Weidong ---------------- CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  August 15, 2010
#### Harvey Hundley, Respondent, v. Melvin Samuels, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff as a result of having been struck by defendant’s motor vehicle, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, entered May 18, 1961, after trial, upon a jury’s verdict of $56,000 in favor of the plaintiff. Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless, within 30 days after entry of the order hereon, plaintiff shall stipulate to reduce the verdict to $40,000, in which event the judgment, as so reduced, is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the verdict was excessive. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 12-35
 THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 Nine Months Ended
    
    
    Twelve Months Ended December 31(Millions of Dollars)
    
    September 30, 2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004Earnings:Pretax earnings
    
    $
    512
    
    
    $
    517
    
    
    $
    466
    
    
    $
    482
    
    
    $
    426
    
    
    $
    214Fixed charges
    
    
    258
    
    
    
    324
    
    
    
    319
    
    
    
    299
    
    
    
    280
    
    
    
    294Net earnings
    
    
    770
    
    
    $
    841
    
    
    $
    785
    
    
    $
    781
    
    
    $
    706
    
    
    $
    508Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    245
    
    
    $
    293
    
    
    $
    294
    
    
    $
    278
    
    
    $
    267
    
    
    $
    280Adjustments
    
    
    13
    
    
    
    31
    
    
    
    25
    
    
    
    21
    
    
    
    13
    
    
    
    14Fixed charges
    
    $
    258
    
    
    $
    324
    
    
    $
    319
    
    
    $
    299
    
    
    $
    280
    
    
    $
    294Ratio of earnings to
fixed charges
    
    
    2.98
    
    
    
    2.60
    
    
    
    2.46
    
    
    
    2.61
    
    
    
    2.52
    
    
    
    1.73
### **CHAPTER 36—FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE

Sec.
1801.
Definitions.
1802.
Electronic surveillance authorization without court order; certification by Attorney General; reports to Congressional committees; transmittal under seal; duties and compensation of communication common carrier; applications; jurisdiction of court.
1803.
Designation of judges.
1804.
Applications for court orders.
1805.
Issuance of order.
1805a to 1805c. Repealed.
1806.
Use of information.
1807.
Report of electronic surveillance.
1808.
Report of Attorney General to Congressional committees; limitation on authority or responsibility of information gathering activities of Congressional committees; report of Congressional committees to Congress.
1809.
Criminal sanctions.
1810.
Civil liability.
1810a.
Reporting requirements for civil actions.
1811.
Authorization during time of war.
1812.
Statement of exclusive means by which electronic surveillance and interception of certain communications may be conducted.
1813.
Procedures for the retention of incidentally acquired communications.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—PHYSICAL SEARCHES

1821.
Definitions.
1822.
Authorization of physical searches for foreign intelligence purposes.
1823.
Application for order.
1824.
Issuance of order.
1825.
Use of information.
1826.
Congressional oversight.
1827.
Penalties.
1828.
Civil liability.
1829.
Authorization during time of war.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—PEN REGISTERS AND TRAP AND TRACE DEVICES FOR FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE PURPOSES

1841.
Definitions.
1842.
Pen registers and trap and trace devices for foreign intelligence and international terrorism investigations.
1843.
Authorization during emergencies.
1844.
Authorization during time of war.
1845.
Use of information.
1846.
Congressional oversight.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—ACCESS TO CERTAIN BUSINESS RECORDS FOR FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE PURPOSES

1861.
Definitions.
1862.
Access to certain business records for foreign intelligence and international terrorism investigations.
1863.
Congressional oversight.
1864.
Notification of changes to retention of call detail record policies.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—OVERSIGHT

1871.
Semiannual report of the Attorney General.
1872.
Declassification of significant decisions, orders, and opinions.
1873.
Annual reports.
1874.
Public reporting by persons subject to orders.

#### SUBCHAPTER VI—ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES REGARDING CERTAIN PERSONS OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES

1881.
Definitions.
1881a.
Procedures for targeting certain persons outside the United States other than United States persons.
1881b.
Certain acquisitions inside the United States targeting United States persons outside the United States.
1881c.
Other acquisitions targeting United States persons outside the United States.
1881d.
Joint applications and concurrent authorizations.
1881e.
Use of information acquired under this subchapter.
1881f.
Congressional oversight.
1881g.
Savings provision.
1881h.
Penalties for unauthorized disclosure.

#### SUBCHAPTER VII—PROTECTION OF PERSONS ASSISTING THE GOVERNMENT

1885.
Definitions.
1885a.
Procedures for implementing statutory defenses.
1885b.
Preemption.
1885c.
Reporting.