alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION **RETROFIT CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, STATEWIDE**

**RACM Analysis Control Measure:**  Retrofit Construction Equipment **Description:** Twenty percent of the construction equipment used on state projects must use a combination of retrofit technology and ULSD. **Documentation:** Effectiveness of retrofit technology: http://www.lubrizol.com/EngineControl/products/ **Methodology:** The NONROAD 2005 model was used to estimate 2009 VOC, NOx, PM2.5 and SO2 emissions. Both daily and annual emissions were modeled. This measure was assumed to result in a 2% reduction of each pollutant. VOC benefits were only taken from the current exhaust emission totals, this control measure was assumed to have no impact on diurnal, crankcase, displacement or spillage emissions. **Inputs/A s**  **sumptions:**  The percent reduction resulting from retrofitting construction equipment used on state projects is assumed to only have an impact on exhaust emissions.
 Itis assumed that 10% of the 2009 inventory of the following equipment will be used on state contracts: airport equipment, commercial equipment, construction and mining equipment, industrial equipment and railroad equipment.  Itis assumed that 20% of the vehicles used on state contracts will be required to use retrofit technology.
 Based on information published by Lubrizol Engine Control Systems, retrofit technology is expected to reduce PM emissions by 91% and VOC emissions by 96%.
 The NONROAD 2005 model was used to estimate 2009 emissions.  The average cost of retrofit equipment is $7,500.
 The expected useful life of the retrofit equipment is 6 years.  The construction equipment operates on an average of 250 days per year. NONROAD inputs: **NY -**  **NJ -**  **CT PA**  **- NJ**  **- DE**  **PA -**  **NJ -**  **MD -**  **DE**

**Inputs Annual**  **Sum. Day Annual**  **Sum. Day Min**  19.1 66.8 24.2 65.1 **Max** 83.9 82. 9 85.3 78.1 **Avg.** 51.0 75.0 54.4 75.0 **RVP** 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 **O2 Weight** 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 **Gas Sulfur** 0.0030 0.0030 0.0030 0.0030 **Diesel Sulfur** 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 **Stage II** 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

### NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION **RETROFIT CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, STATEWIDE**

**RACM Analysis Results:**  Ozone Analysis
– Daily Benefits (tpd) i n New Jersey:



### Benefits **(Reductions) Ozone Non**  **- At** **tainment A rea**  **NY -**  **NJ -**  **CT PA**  **- NJ**  **- MD**  **- DE**  **VOC (Tons/Day )**  0.27 0.10 **NOx (Tons/Day** **)** NA NA PM 2.5 Analysis
– Annual Benefits (tpy) in New Jersey:



### Benefits **(Reductions) PM**  **2.5** 

### Non **- At** **tainment A rea**  **NY -**  **NJ -**  **CT PA**  **- NJ**  **- DE**  **NOx (Tons/Year)** NA NA **PM2.5 (Tons/Year)** 21.94 3.70 **SO 2**  

### (Tons/Year) NA NA Cost Benefit Results:



### Nonattainment A **rea Ozone ($/tpd)**  **VOC NOx**  NY- NJ - CT $ 133,392 NA PA- NJ - MD - DE $ 111,839 NA Statewide $ 127,778 NA **Nonattainment A rea**  **PM2.5 ($/tpy** **) NOx**  **PM2.5 SO2**  NY- NJ - CT NA $ 16,969 NA PA- NJ - DE NA $ 16,891 NA Statewide NA $ 16,958 NA
#### § 57.12007 Junction box connection procedures.

Trailing cable and power-cable connections to junction boxes shall not be made or broken under load.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

_________________________________ 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

MARTIN LEE PARIS, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

No. 18-3139 

(D.C. No. 5:16-CV-04073-DDC & 

5:03-CR-40031-DDC-1) 

(D. Kan.) 

_________________________________ 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

_________________________________ 

Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges. 

_________________________________ 

This matter comes on for consideration of the Motion of the United States for 

Summary Affirmance and the response filed thereto by Defendant Martin Lee Paris. 

The United States moves for summary affirmance of the district court’s dismissal of 

Mr. Paris’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion based on this court’s recent published decision 

in United States v. Pullen, 913 F.3d 1270 (10th Cir. 2019), en banc rev. denied April 

15, 2019. While Mr. Paris does not dispute that United States v. Greer, 881 F.3d 

1241 (10th Cir. 2018), and Pullen control the outcome of this appeal and does not 

 * After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined 

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of 

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore 

ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding 

precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral 

estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with 

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

May 6, 2019

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court
2 

contest summary affirmance of the district court’s judgment, he reserves the right to 

petition the Supreme Court of the United States for certiorari review. 

Accordingly, the government’s motion for summary affirmance is granted. The 

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 

Entered for the Court 

Per Curiam
#### § 550.102 What does this part do?

(a) This part contains the regulations of the BOEM Offshore program that govern oil, gas, and sulfur exploration, development, and production operations on the OCS. When you conduct operations on the OCS, you must submit requests, applications, and notices, or provide supplemental information for BOEM approval.

(b) The following table of general references shows where to look for information about these processes.

| For information about | Refer to |
| --- | --- |
| (1) Applications for permit to drill | 30 CFR 250, subpart D. |
| (2) Development and Production Plans (DPP) | 30 CFR 550, subpart B. |
| (3) Downhole commingling | 30 CFR 250, subpart K. |
| (4) Exploration Plans (EP) | 30 CFR 550, subpart B. |
| (5) Flaring | 30 CFR 250, subpart K. |
| (6) Gas measurement | 30 CFR 250, subpart L. |
| (7) Off-lease geological and geophysical permits | 30 CFR 551. |
| (8) Oil spill financial responsibility coverage | 30 CFR 553. |
| (9) Oil and gas production safety systems | 30 CFR 250, subpart H. |
| (10) Oil spill response plans | 30 CFR 254. |
| (11) Oil and gas well-completion operations | 30 CFR 250, subpart E. |
| (12) Oil and gas well-workover operations | 30 CFR 250, subpart F. |
| (13) Decommissioning Activities | 30 CFR 250, subpart Q. |
| (14) Platforms and structures | 30 CFR 250, subpart I. |
| (15) Pipelines and Pipeline Rights-of-Way | 30 CFR 250, subpart J and 30 CFR 550, subpart J. |
| (16) Sulfur operations | 30 CFR 250, subpart P. |
| (17) Training | 30 CFR 250, subpart O. |
| (18) Unitization | 30 CFR 250, subpart M. |

Table—Where To Find Information for Conducting Operations

[76 FR 64623, Oct. 18, 2011, as amended at 89 FR 31585, Apr. 24, 2024]
#### § 750.13 Small operator assistance.

Part 795 of this chapter is applicable on Indian lands.
### §403–3a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 403–3a, comprising section 103A of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as section 3026 of this title.
Exhibit 31.2

Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial and Accounting Officer

I,
Paul C. Wirth, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: May 12, 2004 |  | /s/PAUL C. WIRTHName: Paul C. Wirth
Title: Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
|------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
#### § 27.34 Test for intrinsic safety.

Assemblies, subassemblies, or components that are designed for intrinsic safety shall be tested by introducing into the circuit(s) thereof a circuit-interrupting device which produces an electric spark from the current in the circuit. The circuit-interrupting device shall be placed in a gallery containing various flammable natural gas-air mixtures. To meet the requirements of this test, the spark shall not ignite the flammable mixture. For this test the circuit-interrupting device shall be operated not less than 100 times at 125 percent of the normal operating voltage of the particular circuit.
# C_2023305EN.01000101.xml

| 29.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11059 – TOYOFUJI / NYK / KAMIGUMI / TTC / PT PATIMBAN INTERNATIONAL CAR TERMINAL)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 305/01)

On 26 May 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11059. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11059. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### PEOPLE ex rel. DOONAN v. McADOO, Police Com’r, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 3, 1905.)

Proceedings by the people of the state of New York, on the relation of Edward E. Doonan, against William McAdoo, as police commissioner, etc., and another. No opinion. Application to amend order granted.
##### 



AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE
  Whereas, the original payment dates of the Note were (the Payment Dates:) as
follows: (a) Borrower was to pay Two Hundred Fifty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($250,000.00) on
each May 1, 2007 and May 1, 2008 together will accrued interest on the unpaid principal as of
such payment date; and (b) the entire unpaid balance of principal and all accrued but unpaid
interest was due and payable on May 1, 2009; andWhereas,Lender and the Borrower previously entered into several extensions of the
Payment Dates and desire to further extend the Payment Dates;Whereas,Borrower has made no payments under the Note to date; andWhereas,Borrower and the Lender desire to further extend the Maturity Date;Now Therefore,for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree to amend the Note as follows:
 1.
    
    The Maturity Date of the Note shall be further extended until May 1, 2009.2.
    
    To effectuate the foregoing:
 The PAYMENTSection of the Note shall be replaced in its entirety by the following:
 PAYMENT. The principal balance of the Note, plus all accrued and unpaid interest
shall be due and payable on May 1, 2009. Unless otherwise agreed or required by
applicable law, payments will be applied first to accrued unpaid interest, then to
principal, and any remaining amount to any unpaid collection cost and late charges.
The annual interest rate for this Note is computed on a 365/360 basis; that is, by
applying the ratio of the annual interest rate over a year of 360 days, multiplied
by the outstanding principal balance, multiplied by the actual number of days the
principal balance is outstanding. Borrower will pay Lender at Lenders address
shown above or at such other place as Lender may designate in writing
 3.
    
    Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them
in the Note.




---



##### 



4.
    
    Except as amended by this Amendment, the Note shall remain in full force and
effect, enforceable in accordance with its terms and Maker hereby reaffirms and
acknowledges all of its obligations thereunder.
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 David R. Vey, PrincipalOak Harbor Investment PropertiesSedona CorporationBy:
    Marco Emrich, President -2-
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-02-15T02:07:26-0500
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
# C_2023315EN.01000201.xml

| 5.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11201 – REXEL DEVELOPPEMENT / WASCO)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 315/02)

On 25 August 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain.It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11201. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11201. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.1400-3 Daily examination of hoisting equipment. Hoists and elevators shall be examined daily and such examinations shall include, but not be limited to, the following: ( a ) *Elevators.* A visual examination of the rope for wear, broken wires, and corrosion, especially at excessive strain points such as near the attachments and where the rope rests on sheaves;
( b ) *Hoists and elevators.* ( 1 ) An examination of the rope fastenings for defects;
( 2 ) An examination of safety catches;
( 3 ) An examination of the cages, platforms, elevators, or other devices for loose, missing or defective parts;
( 4 ) An examination of the head sheaves to check for broken flanges, defective bearings, rope alignment, and proper lubrication; and
( 5 ) An observation of the lining and all other equipment and appurtenances installed in the shaft.
[48 FR 53239, Nov. 25, 1983]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9864 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9864

   To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to prohibit the 
 introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of 
   food packaging containing intentionally added PFAS, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 27, 2024

  Mrs. Dingell (for herself, Ms. Norton, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Lynch, Ms. 
Pingree, Mrs. Trahan, Ms. Barragan, Ms. Tlaib, Mr. Casten, Mr. Davis of 
  Illinois, Mr. Thanedar, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Sorensen, Ms. Meng, Ms. 
Tokuda, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Cohen, Ms. Lofgren, Ms. Titus, Mr. Garcia of 
  Illinois, Mr. Nadler, and Mr. Fitzpatrick) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to prohibit the 
 introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of 
   food packaging containing intentionally added PFAS, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Keep Food Containers Safe from PFAS 
Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST FOOD PACKAGING CONTAINING INTENTIONALLY 
              ADDED PFAS.

    (a) In General.--Section 301 of the Federal Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 331) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(fff)(1) The introduction or delivery for introduction into 
interstate commerce of food packaging containing intentionally added 
PFAS.
    ``(2) The term `PFAS' means a perfluoroalkyl substance or a 
polyfluoroalkyl substance that is man-made with at least 1 fully 
fluorinated carbon atom.''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
beginning on January 1, 2025.
                                 <all>
```
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Productivity of Labor in the Cotton-Garment Industry

              																	Cahen, Alfred, 1907-1976					,	Nelson, Saul, 1901-					 and 	Stone, Nahum I., 1873-1966. 						*Productivity of Labor in the Cotton-Garment Industry : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 662*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. G.P.O., 										November 1938,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4171,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
### §2633. Continuation of processing, treatment, and disposal of legacy nuclear materials

The Secretary of Energy shall continue operations and maintain a high state of readiness at the H–canyon facility at the Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina, and shall provide technical staff necessary to operate and so maintain such facility.

(Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLIV, §4453, formerly Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [div. C, title XXXI, §3137(a)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–460; renumbered Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLIV, §4453, and amended Pub. L. 108–136, div. C, title XXXI, §§3115(a), 3141(g)(23)(A), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1745, 1769.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2003—Pub. L. 108–136, §3141(g)(23)(A)(iii), inserted section catchline and struck out former subsec. heading.

Pub. L. 108–136, §3115(a), substituted "H–canyon facility" for "F–canyon and H–canyon facilities" and "such facility" for "such facilities".
Exhibit No. 32.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  As Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DRS Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Schneider, Chief Financial Officer of DRS Technologies, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|February 9, 2005 |  | /s/RICHARD A. SCHNEIDERRichard A. Schneider Chief
Financial Officer
|---------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------

A
SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO DRS TECHNOLOGIES,
INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY DRS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

51

---



QuickLinks
§ 725.21 Allowable costs. ( a ) The Director or his authorized designee shall determine costs which may be reimbursed according to Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-87.
( b ) Costs must be in conformity with any limitations conditions or exclusions set forth in the grant agreement or this part.
( c ) Costs must be allocated to the grant to the extent of benefit properly attributable to the period covered by the grant.
( d ) Costs must not be allocated to or included as a cost of any other federally assisted program.
[42 FR 62704, Dec. 13, 1977, as amended at 47 FR 38490, Aug. 31, 1982]