alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 45,293

#### David W. Carson, *Appellant,*v. Joseph H. McDowell, Mayor; Earl B. Swarner, Commissioner of Finance and Public Property; Joseph Regan, Commissioner of Boulevards and Parks; The City of Kansas City, Kansas, and Gary Smith, Intervenor, *Appellees.*

(452 P. 2d 831)

Opinion filed April 12, 1969.

*John Ii. Fields,*of Kansas City, argued the cause and was on the brief for the appellant.

*Edward H. Powers*and *Donald H. Corson, Jr.,*both of Kansas City, argued the cause and were on the brief for the intervenor.

C. *W. Brenneisen, Jr.,*and *Matthew Podrebarac,*both of Kansas City, were on the brief for the appellee city of Kansas City.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harman, C.:

Although this zoning appeal differs in certain aspects not here material, the controlling issue is identical with that in a companion case (Nos. 45,210 and 45,292, consolidated) *Carson v. McDowell,*203 Kan. 40, 452 P. 2d 828, this day decided.

The property sought to be rezoned here is a small tract near the two tracts in the companion case. The zoning action directed toward it was started and conducted separately about three months after the proceedings in the companion case; however, upon appeal to the district court all were consolidated and tried together.

The critical dates here are: The planning commissions statutory (then K. S. A. 1965 Supp. 12-708) notice of public hearing was published in the official city newspaper March 22, 1966. The date fixed for hearing was April 11, 1966. Thus only nineteen clear days ■elapsed between the date of publication and the date of hearing .instead of the requisite twenty.

*139Under authority of the companion case, *supra,*the publication notice was fatally defective, and the judgment appealed from is reversed.

APPROVED BY THE COURT.
Final EIS Appendix I

APPENDIX I—DISTURBANCE DENSITY 

CALCULATION TOOL MANUAL

Information on the Disturbance Density Calculation Tool has been incorporated into Appendix D.

Wyoming Greater Sage-Grouse Land Use Plan Amendment I-1 
Appendix I Final EIS 

This page intentionally left blank.

I-2 Wyoming Greater Sage-Grouse Land Use Plan Amendment
#### § 56.19045 Metal bonnets.

Man cages and skips used for hoisting or lowering employees or other persons in any vertical shaft or any incline-shaft with an angle of inclination of forty-five degrees from the horizontal, shall be covered with a metal bonnet.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 27, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-3-2000
<PERIOD-START>                               NOV-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 AUG-27-2000
<CASH>                                           199,481
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  7,639,348
<ALLOWANCES>                                     500,000
<INVENTORY>                                   28,281,882
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              41,758,158
<PP&E>                                        78,314,501
<DEPRECIATION>                                33,308,921
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                90,384,511
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         27,512,734
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                         392,732
<OTHER-SE>                                    14,136,674
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  90,384,511
<SALES>                                      157,351,974
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             157,351,974
<CGS>                                         95,423,649
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 95,423,649
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5,107,679
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,669,186
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  485,868
<INCOME-TAX>                                      26,050
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              485,868
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     459,818
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.02



</TABLE>
§ 917.13 State statutory and regulatory provisions set aside. ( a ) The following provision of Kentucky Revised Statute at KRS 350.060(22) is inconsistent with section 701(28) of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 and is hereby set aside effective December 1, 1985: “(22) All operations involving the crushing, screening, or loading of coal which do not separate the coal from its impurities, and which are not located at or near the mine site, shall be exempt from the requirements of this chapter.”
( b ) Reserved]
( c ) The following portions of the Kentucky Revised Statute at KRS 350.060(16) are inconsistent with section 506 of SMCRA and less effective than 30 CFR 843.11 and are set aside effective September 6, 2000:
The specific wording is the phrase “if a permit has expired or . . .” and the following sentence: Upon the submittal of a permit renewal application, the operator or permittee shall be deemed to have timely filed the permit renewal application and shall be entitled to continue, under the terms of the expired permit, the surface coal mining operation, pending the issuance of the permit renewal.
[50 FR 47728, Nov. 20, 1985, as amended at 65 FR 53911, Sept. 6, 2000]
Exhibit 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John Kehoe, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of MS Structured Asset Corp.
on behalf of SATURNS Trust No. 2002-1;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;
and

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and
the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based
upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trustee
have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: LaSalle Bank National
Association and its officers and agents.



                                                   By: /s/ John Kehoe
                                                      ----------------------
                                                   Name:  John Kehoe
                                                   Title: Vice President
                                                   Date:  February 27, 2004
# C_2023241EN.01000301.xml

| 7.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 241/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 241/3

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1)
  )

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 241/03)

Decision granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2023) 4322 | 30 June 2023 | 4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated (‘4-tert-OPnEO’)
  EC No.-; CAS No.- | Biokit S.A., Avinguda Can Montcau 7, 08186, Lliçà d’Amunt, Spain | REACH/23/14/0 | Industrial use as a detergent in the preparation of reagents for incorporation into latex-based, ELISA and CLIA in-vitro-diagnostic kits | 4 January 2031 | In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies. |
| REACH/23/14/1 | Professional use as a detergent during the final use of latex-based, ELISA and CLIA in-vitro-diagnostic kits | 4 January 2033 |

Reference of the decision (2)

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2023) 4322

30 June 2023

4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated (‘4-tert-OPnEO’)

EC No.-; CAS No.-

Biokit S.A., Avinguda Can Montcau 7, 08186, Lliçà d’Amunt, Spain

REACH/23/14/0

Industrial use as a detergent in the preparation of reagents for incorporation into latex-based, ELISA and CLIA in-vitro-diagnostic kits

4 January 2031

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.

REACH/23/14/1

Professional use as a detergent during the final use of latex-based, ELISA and CLIA in-vitro-diagnostic kits

4 January 2033

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu).

---
### §101303. Medical attention for employees

(a) In General.—In the administration of the Service, the Secretary may contract for medical attention and service for employees and to make necessary payroll deductions agreed to by the employees for that medical attention and service.

(b) Employees Located at Isolated Situations.—The Secretary may provide, out of amounts appropriated for the general expense of the System units, medical attention for employees of the Service located at isolated situations, including—

(1) moving the employees to hospitals or other places where medical assistance is available; and

(2) in case of death, to remove the bodies of deceased employees to the nearest place where they can be prepared for shipment or for burial.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3124.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 101303(a) | 16 U.S.C. 11. | May 10, 1926, ch. 277, §1 (last undesignated par. under heading "NATIONAL PARKS"), 44 Stat. 491. |
| 101303(b) | 16 U.S.C. 13. | July 3, 1926, ch. 792, §2, 44 Stat. 900. |

Section
PUBLIC LAW 115–100—JAN. 3, 2018 131 STAT. 2245 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 2273: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017): 

Dec. 21, considered and passed Senate. 

Dec. 22, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–100 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To extend the period during which vessels that are shorter than 79 feet in length 

and fishing vessels are not required to have a permit for discharges incidental 

to the normal operation of the vessel. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF MORATORIUM. 

Section 2(a) of Public Law 110–299 (33 U.S.C. 1342 note) is 

amended by striking ‘‘December 18, 2017’’ and inserting ‘‘January 

19, 2018’’. 

Approved January 3, 2018. 

Jan. 3, 2018 

[S. 2273] 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
Editorial Note on Part 785
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54965, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 785 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93379-93381, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 785.25 Lands eligible for remining. ( a ) This section contains permitting requirements to implement § 773.13. Any person who submits a permit application to conduct a surface coal mining operation on lands eligible for remining must comply with this section.
( b ) Any application for a permit under this section shall be made according to all requirements of this subchapter applicable to surface coal mining and reclamation operations. In addition, the application shall— ( 1 ) To the extent not otherwise addressed in the permit application, identify potential environmental and safety problems related to prior mining activity at the site and that could be reasonably anticipated to occur. This identification shall be based on a due diligence investigation which shall include visual observations at the site, a record review of past mining at the site, and environmental sampling tailored to current site conditions.
( 2 ) With regard to potential environmental and safety problems referred to in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, describe the mitigative measures that will be taken to ensure that the applicable reclamation requirements of the regulatory program can be met.
[60 FR 58491, Nov. 27, 1995, as amended at 65 FR 79669, Dec. 19, 2000; 73 FR 67630, Nov. 14, 2008; 81 FR 93381, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54965, Nov. 17, 2017]
#### § 77.516 Electric wiring and equipment; installation and maintenance.

In addition to the requirements of §§ 77.503 and 77.506, all wiring and electrical equipment installed after June 30, 1971, shall meet the requirements of the National Electric Code in effect at the time of installation.
EXHIBIT
32.1








Section 906
Certifications








Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, the undersigned, Andrew E. Kersey, the President and Chief Executive
Officer and Jeffery A. Baird, the Chief Financial Officer of CAS Medical
Systems, Inc. (the “issuer”), do hereby certify that the report on Form 10-K
accompanying this certification (the “report”) fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
((15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the issuer.











/s/
Andrew E. Kersey


Andrew E.
Kersey


President
and Chief Executive Officer


CAS
Medical Systems, Inc.


April 3,
2009

















/s/
Jeffery A. Baird


Jeffery
A. Baird


Chief
Financial Officer


CAS
Medical Systems, Inc.


April 3,
2009
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 29, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 136534 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

LINDA C. GOULET, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 136534 

 COA: 281685 

Washtenaw CC: 06-000323-CZ 

ANN ARBOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS and 

TOWNSHIP OF PITTSFIELD, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 25, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0721 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 29, 2008 

 Clerk
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

U.S.C. Section 1350,

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Devcon International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Mark McIntosh, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 29, 2008



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ Mark McIntosh                           
|Mark McIntosh                               
|Chief Financial Officer                     
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### Margaret Kownack, Respondent, v. John Schroedel, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 23, 1960, granting-plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, striking out the answer and ordering an assessment of damages (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 113). Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. In our opinion, issues of fact are presented which should be resolved after trial. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
#### SMITH, Respondent, v. ALBANY & H. RY. & POWER CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

January 14, 1903.)

Action by Ida Smith against the Albany & Hudson Railway & Power Company.

No opinion. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-20533

Summary Calendar

David Garza, 

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

Lorie Davis; Troy Selman, Warden; 

Betty Williams, Medical Doctor, 

Defendants—Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

No. 4:18-CV-4387

Before Smith, Stewart, and Graves, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

David Garza, Texas inmate #1633521, appeals the summary-judgment 

dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil action alleging that the defendants were 

deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs by denying him proper 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances 

set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 7, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-20533 Document: 00516158826 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/07/2022
No. 20-20533

2

medication to manage his chronic pain. Garza further challenges the denials 

of his motion to amend and supplement his complaint and his motion for 

appointment of counsel. We affirm.

The district court did not err by granting summary judgment. See 

McFaul v. Valenzuela, 684 F.3d 564, 571 (5th Cir. 2012). The competent 

summary judgment evidence shows that Dr. Williams prescribed Garza a 

30-day course of naproxen—the pain medication he specifically requested—

with no refills and warned him about risks of long-term use of naproxen that 

were specific to his underlying health conditions. The evidence also shows 

that Garza was prescribed two other medications for pain management—one 

with multiple refills—and also had access to acetaminophen by request. 

Accordingly, the district court properly determined that there is no genuine 

dispute of material fact and that Dr. Williams is entitled to judgment as a 

matter of law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a); Gobert v. Caldwell, 463 F.3d 339, 

345-46 (5th Cir. 2006). Furthermore, Garza has waived, by failure to brief, 

any challenge to the summary judgment for the remaining defendants. See 

Grant v. Cuellar, 59 F.3d 523, 524 (5th Cir. 1995); Brinkmann v. Dallas Cnty. 

Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).

Additionally, Garza fails to show an abuse of discretion in the denial 

of his motions to amend and supplement his complaint. See Pervasive Software Inc. v. Lexware GmbH & Co. KG, 688 F.3d 214, 232 (5th Cir. 2012); 

Burns v. Exxon Corp., 158 F.3d 336, 343 (5th Cir. 1998). He also does not 

demonstrate that the district court abused its discretion in declining to 

appoint counsel. See Baranowski v. Hart, 486 F.3d 112, 126 (5th Cir. 2007).

AFFIRMED.

Case: 20-20533 Document: 00516158826 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/07/2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM DRAVO
CORPORATION'S MARCH 31, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                            1055
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    23164
<ALLOWANCES>                                       197
<INVENTORY>                                      17265
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 41863
<PP&E>                                          251508
<DEPRECIATION>                                  114555
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  235772
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            33539
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         15100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            20000
<PREFERRED>                                         19
<OTHER-SE>                                       79301
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    235772
<SALES>                                          37624
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 37624
<CGS>                                            29851
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    29851
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1562
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1158
<INCOME-TAX>                                        84
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1074
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1074
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>