### Name: John M. McManus

Title: Vice President- Environmental Service Company: American Electric Power Sign Date: 6/30/2010 Name: Scott W. Banach Title: Director, Project Engineering Company: Platt Environmental Services, Inc Sign Date: 6/25/2010 Permitted Facility Representative / Date Testing Company Representative / Date 

## Kammer Unit 3 Final Test Report for

/ / Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the statements and information in this test report are true, accurate, and complete. I have reviewed all testing details and results in this test report and hereby certify that the test report is authentic and accurate.

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 1 of 30

### Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010 Facility Information:

Kammer Unit 3

State Route 2

Moundsville W 26041
Contact: Paul Jackson

Phone: 614-716-3278

Fax: 614-716-1252

Email: pmjackson@aep.com Testing Company:
Platt Environmental Services, Inc. 1520 Kensington Road

Suite 204

Oak Brook IL 60523
Contact: Scott Banach

Phone: 630-521-9400

Fax: 630-521-9494

Email: sbanach@plattenv.com

Air Permit Number:
R30-05100006-2009 Permitted Source ID/Name:
Boiler 3 Unit 3

Permitted Maximum Process Rate:
N/A Max. Normal Operation Process Rate:
N/A Target Process Test Rate
N/A

Description of the source (including control equipment). Please see the attachments for source or process flow diagram:
Electric generating wet bottom cyclone boiler utilizing bituminous coal. Control equipment consists of an electrostatic precipitator and overfire air. Unit is rated at 2156 mmBTU/hr. Unit shares a common stack with units 1 and 2. Industry/SCC/NAIS 221112

Sampling Location Information:

Test Parameter Information: AFS #: FRS #:

SCC / Description 10100203 External Combustion Boilers - Electric Generation - Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal - Cyclone Furnace (Bituminous Coal)

The following state and federal regulations that apply to the proposed testing:

Location Round

Duct Diam. Distance from upstream dist. Distance from

downstream dist. Number of

Traverse Ports Equiv. Diam Min.Travers Points Rect. Duct Length /Width
Stack 276 5238 4824 4 0 16 0 0

Target Parameter Test Method Number of

Test Runs Test Run

Duration Sample

Points Comments Location
2,3,7,8-TCDD Method 23 3 8 0 Stack 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD Method 23 3 8 0 Stack 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD Method 23 3 8 0 Stack 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD Method 23 3 8 0 Stack 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD Method 23 3 8 0 Stack 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD Method 23 3 8 0 Stack OCDD Method 23 3 8 0 Stack



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 2 of 30

### Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation of request AND approval, including dates.

2,3,7,8-TCDF Method 23 3 8 0 Stack 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF Method 23 3 8 0 Stack 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF Method 23 3 8 0 Stack 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF Method 23 3 8 0 Stack 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF Method 23 3 8 0 Stack 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF Method 23 3 8 0 Stack 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF Method 23 3 8 0 Stack 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF Method 23 3 8 0 Stack 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF Method 23 3 8 0 Stack
OCDF Method 23 3 8 0 Stack 3,3',4,4'-TCB (PCB77) Method 23 3 8 0 Stack 3,4,4',5-TCB (PCB81) Method 23 3 8 0 Stack 2,3,3',4,4'-PeCB (PCB105) Method 23 3 8 0 Stack 2,3,4,4',5-PeCB (PCB114) Method 23 3 8 0 Stack 2,3',4,4',5-PeCB (PCB118) Method 23 3 8 0 Stack 2',3,4,4',5-PeCB (PCB123) Method 23 3 8 0 Stack 3,3',4,4',5-PeCB (PCB126) Method 23 3 8 0 Stack 2,3,3',4,4',5/2,3,3',4,4',5'-

HxCB (PCBs156/157) Method 23 3 8 0 Stack

2,3',4,4',5,5'-HxCB (PCB167) Method 23 3 8 0 Stack 3,3',4,4',5,5'-HxCB (PCB169) Method 23 3 8 0 Stack 2,3,3',4,4',5,5'-HpCB

(PCB189) Method 23 3 8 0 Stack

Co2 Method 3A CO2 3 2 0 Stack O2 Method 3A O2 3 2 0 Stack



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 3 of 30

### Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010 Sampling / Stack Data Results Summary



### Location Stack - Method 23 Average
Run Number M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Test Date 2/23/2010 2/24/2010 2/25/2010

Run Start Time 9:00:00 AM 8:15:00 AM 8:55:00 AM

Run Finish Time 5:30:00 PM 4:35:00 PM 5:20:00 PM
Net Run Time, minutes 480 480 480 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 305.513 406.851 419.788 377.384
Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 6.20 6.00 6.06 6.087 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.000
Carbon Dioxide, % 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.700 Oxygen, % 8.6 8.7 8.7 8.667 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 261.47 259.84 259.75 260.353 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1,211,017.8 1,190,273.9 1,199,124.4 1,200,138.70 0
Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 1,825,767.7 1,786,629.9 1,800,839.2 1,804,412.26 7 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 101.1 100.8 103.2 101.700
F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000



### Location Stack - Method 3A CO2 Average
Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time
Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm
F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2
Moisture, % Fuel Type

Fw

Fc



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 4 of 30

### Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A O2 Average
Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time
Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm
F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2
Moisture, % Fuel Type

Fw

Fc



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 5 of 30

### Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010 Emissions Summary



### Location: Stack - Method 23 Compound: 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD Average RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3 Mass_mg 0.0000000015 0.0000000016 0.0000000016 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 1.80E-13 1.45E-13 1.41E-13 0.000 ng/dscm 1.73E-04 1.39E-04 1.35E-04 0.000


### Compound: 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF Average RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3 Mass_mg 0.0000000048 0.0000000039 0.000000011 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 5.76E-13 3.54E-13 9.68E-13 0.000 ng/dscm 5.55E-04 3.39E-04 9.26E-04 0.001


### Compound: 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF Average RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3 Mass_mg 0.0000000019 0.0000000017 0.000000002 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 2.28E-13 1.54E-13 1.76E-13 0.000 ng/dscm 2.20E-04 1.48E-04 1.68E-04 0.000


### Compound: 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD Average RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3 Mass_mg 0.0000000016 0.0000000016 0.0000000016 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 1.92E-13 1.45E-13 1.41E-13 0.000 ng/dscm 1.85E-04 1.39E-04 1.35E-04 0.000


### Compound: 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF Average RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3 Mass_mg 0.0000000016 0.0000000016 0.0000000015 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 1.92E-13 1.45E-13 1.32E-13 0.000 ng/dscm 1.85E-04 1.39E-04 1.26E-04 0.000


### Compound: 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD Average RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3 Mass_mg 0.0000000016 0.0000000016 0.0000000015 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 1.92E-13 1.45E-13 1.32E-13 0.000 ng/dscm 1.85E-04 1.39E-04 1.26E-04 0.000


### Compound: 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF Average RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3 Mass_mg 0.0000000015 0.0000000014 0.0000000014 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 1.80E-13 1.27E-13 1.23E-13 0.000 ng/dscm 1.73E-04 1.22E-04 1.18E-04 0.000



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 6 of 30

### Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010
Compound: 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD Average RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3 Mass_mg 0.0000000015 0.0000000015 0.0000000015 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 1.80E-13 1.36E-13 1.32E-13 0.000 ng/dscm 1.73E-04 1.30E-04 1.26E-04 0.000


### Compound: 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF Average RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3 Mass_mg 0.0000000018 0.0000000018 0.0000000017 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 2.16E-13 1.63E-13 1.50E-13 0.000 ng/dscm 2.08E-04 1.56E-04 1.43E-04 0.000


### Compound: 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD Average RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3 Mass_mg 0.0000000016 0.0000000016 0.0000000016 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 1.92E-13 1.45E-13 1.41E-13 0.000 ng/dscm 1.85E-04 1.39E-04 1.35E-04 0.000


### Compound: 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF Average RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3 Mass_mg 0.0000000016 0.0000000015 0.0000000016 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 1.92E-13 1.36E-13 1.41E-13 0.000 ng/dscm 1.85E-04 1.30E-04 1.35E-04 0.000


### Compound: 2,3,3',4,4',5,5'-HpCB (PCB189) Average RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3 Mass_mg 0.000000012 0.0000000076 0.000000012 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 1.44E-12 6.90E-13 1.06E-12 0.000 ng/dscm 1.39E-03 6.60E-04 1.01E-03 0.001


### Compound: 2,3,3',4,4',5/2,3,3',4,4',5'-HxCB (PC Average RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3 Mass_mg 0.0000000049 0.0000000048 0.0000000077 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 5.88E-13 4.36E-13 6.78E-13 0.000 ng/dscm 5.66E-04 4.17E-04 6.48E-04 0.001


### Compound: 2,3,3',4,4'-PeCB (PCB105) Average RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3 Mass_mg 0.0000000081 0.0000000047 0.0000000054 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 9.71E-13 4.27E-13 4.75E-13 0.000 ng/dscm 9.36E-04 4.08E-04 4.54E-04 0.001


### Compound: 2,3',4,4',5,5'-HxCB (PCB167) Average RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3 Mass_mg 0.0000000048 0.0000000047 0.0000000075 0.000



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 7 of 30

### Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

lb/mmBtuO2 5.76E-13 4.27E-13 6.60E-13 0.000 ng/dscm 5.55E-04 4.08E-04 6.31E-04 0.001


### Compound: 2,3,4,4',5-PeCB (PCB114) Average RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3 Mass_mg 0.000000008 0.0000000046 0.0000000053 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 9.59E-13 4.18E-13 4.66E-13 0.000 ng/dscm 9.25E-04 3.99E-04 4.46E-04 0.001


### Compound: 2,3',4,4',5-PeCB (PCB118) Average RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3 Mass_mg 0.0000000078 0.0000000045 0.00000031 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 9.35E-13 4.09E-13 2.73E-11 0.000 ng/dscm 9.02E-04 3.91E-04 2.61E-02 0.009


### Compound: 2',3,4,4',5-PeCB (PCB123) Average RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3 Mass_mg 0.0000000081 0.0000000047 0.0000000054 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 9.71E-13 4.27E-13 4.75E-13 0.000 ng/dscm 9.36E-04 4.08E-04 4.54E-04 0.001


### Compound: 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF Average RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3 Mass_mg 0.0000000018 0.0000000017 0.0000000017 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 2.16E-13 1.54E-13 1.50E-13 0.000 ng/dscm 2.08E-04 1.48E-04 1.43E-04 0.000


### Compound: 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF Average RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3 Mass_mg 0.0000000016 0.0000000015 0.0000000015 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 1.92E-13 1.36E-13 1.32E-13 0.000 ng/dscm 1.85E-04 1.30E-04 1.26E-04 0.000


### Compound: 2,3,7,8-TCDD Average RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3 Mass_mg 0.000000002 0.0000000017 0.0000000017 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 2.40E-13 1.54E-13 1.50E-13 0.000 ng/dscm 2.31E-04 1.48E-04 1.43E-04 0.000


### Compound: 2,3,7,8-TCDF Average RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3 Mass_mg 0.0000000016 0.0000000015 0.0000000018 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 1.92E-13 1.36E-13 1.58E-13 0.000 ng/dscm 1.85E-04 1.30E-04 1.51E-04 0.000


### Compound: 3,3',4,4',5,5'-HxCB (PCB169) Average



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 8 of 30

### Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

Process Run Data RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3 Mass_mg 0.000000005 0.0000000049 0.0000000078 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 6.00E-13 4.45E-13 6.86E-13 0.000 ng/dscm 5.78E-04 4.25E-04 6.56E-04 0.001


### Compound: 3,3',4,4',5-PeCB (PCB126) Average RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3 Mass_mg 0.000000008 0.0000000046 0.0000000053 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 9.59E-13 4.18E-13 4.66E-13 0.000 ng/dscm 9.25E-04 3.99E-04 4.46E-04 0.001


### Compound: 3,3',4,4'-TCB (PCB77) Average RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3 Mass_mg 0.000000015 0.0000000064 0.0000000098 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 1.80E-12 5.81E-13 8.62E-13 0.000 ng/dscm 1.73E-03 5.56E-04 8.25E-04 0.001


### Compound: 3,4,4',5-TCB (PCB81) Average RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3 Mass_mg 0.0000000067 0.0000000082 0.0000000096 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 8.03E-13 7.44E-13 8.45E-13 0.000 ng/dscm 7.75E-04 7.12E-04 8.08E-04 0.001


### Compound: OCDD Average RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3 Mass_mg 0.000000003 0.0000000052 0.0000000035 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 3.60E-13 4.72E-13 3.08E-13 0.000 ng/dscm 3.47E-04 4.51E-04 2.94E-04 0.000


### Compound: OCDF Average RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3 Mass_mg 0.0000000041 0.0000000038 0.0000000039 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 4.92E-13 3.45E-13 3.43E-13 0.000 ng/dscm 4.74E-04 3.30E-04 3.28E-04 0.000



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 9 of 30

### Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010
Process Run Data



### Run Name Value UOM Comments Target Value
1 Bituminous Coal Burned 91.4 Tons/hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 86



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 10 of 30

### Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

2 Bituminous Coal Burned 90.3 Tons/hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 86



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 11 of 30

### Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

3 Bituminous Coal Burned 92.9 Tons/hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 86



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 12 of 30

### Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

1 Steam Temperature 1002 Degrees F The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1000



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 13 of 30

### Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

2 Steam Temperature 1002.4 Degrees F The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1000



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 14 of 30

### Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

3 Steam Temperature 967.5 Degrees F The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1000



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 15 of 30

### Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

1 Steam Pressure 2000.8 PSIG The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 2000



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 16 of 30

### Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

2 Steam Pressure 2000.2 PSIG The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 2000



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 17 of 30

### Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

3 Steam Pressure 2000 PSIG The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 2000



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 18 of 30

### Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

1 Excess Air 12.7 % The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 13



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 19 of 30

### Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

2 Excess Air 13.6 % The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 13



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 20 of 30

### Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

3 Excess Air 12.6 % The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 13



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 21 of 30

### Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

1 Duct Opacity 6.1 % The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 10



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 22 of 30

### Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

2 Duct Opacity 7.6 % The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 10



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 23 of 30

### Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

3 Duct Opacity 6.5 % The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 10



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 24 of 30

### Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

1 PPT 42.5 # in Service The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 48



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 25 of 30

### Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

2 PPT 40.9 # in Service The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 48



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 26 of 30

### Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

APCD Run Data

Process Lab Run Data 3 PPT 38.4 # in Service The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 48



### Run Name Value UOM Comments Target Value
1 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH EFFICIENCY 42.5 # in Service 48



### 2 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH EFFICIENCY 40.9 # in Service 48

3 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH EFFICIENCY 38.4 # in Service 48



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 27 of 30

### Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010
Sampling / Stack Data Results Detail



### Location Stack - Method 23 Average Run Number M23-1 M23-2 M23-3
Test Date 2/23/2010 2/24/2010 2/25/2010 Run Start Time 9:00:00 AM 8:15:00 AM 8:55:00 AM Run Finish Time 5:30:00 PM 4:35:00 PM 5:20:00 PM Net Traversing Points 36 36 36 Net Run Time, minutes 480 480 480 Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.199 0.232 0.232 0.221 Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.840 Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.002 1.002 1.002 1.002 Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.13 29.13 29.13 29.130 Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 1.11 2.03 2.05 1.730 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 307.843 408.158 419.308 378.436 Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 60.47 59.39 57.16 59.007 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 305.513 406.851 419.788 377.384 Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 429.2 551.8 575.5 518.833 Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 20.20 25.97 27.09 24.420 Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 6.20 6.00 6.06 6.087 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.000 Dry Mole Fraction 0.938 0.94 0.9394 0.939 Carbon Dioxide, % 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.700 Oxygen, % 8.6 8.7 8.7 8.667 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80.7 80.6 80.6 80.633 Fuel Factor 1.15 1.14 1.14 Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.06 30.06 30.06 30.060 Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.31 29.34 29.33 29.327 Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -3 -3 -3 -3.000 Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.91 28.91 28.91 28.910 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 261.47 259.84 259.75 260.353 Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 1.2217124983 8789 1.173781599

38876 1.192285077

73315 1.196

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 73.24 71.67 72.24 72.383 Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 415.476 415.476 415.476 415.476 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1,211,017.8 1,190,273.9 1,199,124.4 1,200,138.7 00 Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 1,825,767.7 1,786,629.9 1,800,839.2 1,804,412.2 67 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 101.1 100.8 103.2 101.700 Percent Excess Air, % 67.7 69.2 69.2 68.700 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000 Round Duct Diameter, inches 276 276 276 Rectangular Duct Width, inches 0 0 0 Rectangular Duct Length, inches 0 0 0
Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000
Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 28 of 30

### Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A CO2 Average Run Number
Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Fuel Factor Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Analyzer Make Analyzer Model Analyzer Serial Number Operating Range Operating Units No. Readings/Avg. Calibration Set Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Post High Cylinder ID Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift Cavg Cavg Units Cgas Cgas Units Fuel Type
Fw
Fc Cgasw Cgasw Units



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 29 of 30

### Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A O2 Average Run Number
Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Fuel Factor Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Analyzer Make Analyzer Model Analyzer Serial Number Operating Range Operating Units No. Readings/Avg. Calibration Set Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Post High Cylinder ID Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift Cavg Cavg Units Cgas Cgas Units Fuel Type
Fw
Fc Cgasw Cgasw Units



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 30 of 30