alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.206 Conventional roof support.

(a) Except in anthracite mines using non-mechanized mining systems, when conventional roof support materials are used as the only means of support—

(1) The width of any opening shall not exceed 20 feet;

(2) The spacing of roadway roof support shall not exceed 5 feet;

(3)

(i) Supports shall be installed to within 5 feet of the uncut face;

(ii) When supports nearest the face must be removed to facilitate the operation of face equipment, equivalent temporary support shall be installed prior to removing the supports;

(4) Straight roadways shall not exceed 16 feet wide where full overhead support is used and 14 feet wide where only posts are used;

(5) Curved roadways shall not exceed 16 feet wide; and

(6) The roof at the entrance of all openings along travelways which are no longer needed for storing supplies or for travel of equipment shall be supported by extending the line of support across the opening.

(b) Conventional roof support materials shall meet the following specifications:

(1) The minimum diameter of cross-sectional area of wooden posts shall be as follows:

| Post length (in inches) | Diameter of round posts (in inches) | Cross-sectional area of split posts (in square inches) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 60 or less | 4 | 13 |
| Over 60 to 84 | 5 | 20 |
| Over 84 to 108 | 6 | 28 |
| Over 108 to 132 | 7 | 39 |
| Over 132 to 156 | 8 | 50 |
| Over 156 to 180 | 9 | 64 |
| Over 180 to 204 | 10 | 79 |
| Over 204 to 228 | 11 | 95 |
| Over 228 | 12 | 113 |

(2) Wooden materials used for support shall have the following dimensions:

(i) Cap blocks and footings shall have flat sides and be at least 2 inches thick, 4 inches wide and 12 inches long.

(ii) Crossbars shall have a minimum cross-sectional area of 24 square inches and be at least 3 inches thick.

(iii) Planks shall be at least 6 inches wide and 1 inch thick.

(3) Cribbing materials shall have at least two parallel flat sides.

(c) A cluster of two or more posts that provide equivalent strength may be used to meet the requirements of paragraph (b)(1) of this section, except that no post shall have a diameter less than 4 inches or have a cross-sectional area less than 13 square inches.

(d) Materials other than wood used for support shall have support strength at least equivalent to wooden material meeting the applicable provisions of this section.

(e) Posts and jacks shall be tightly installed on solid footing.

(f) When posts are installed under roof susceptible to sloughing a cap block, plank, crossbar or materials that are equally effective shall be placed between the post and the roof.

(g) Blocks used for lagging between the roof and crossbars shall be spaced to distribute the load.

(h) Jacks used for roof support shall be used with at least 36 square inches of roof bearing surface.

[53 FR 2375, Jan. 27, 1988, as amended at 55 FR 14228, Apr. 16, 1990; 55 FR 20137, May 15, 1990]
<Page>

                                                          Exhibit 23.2


                              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                           CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


Photogen Technologies, Inc.
New Hope, PA

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated April
5, 2002, relating to the financial statements of Sentigen Ltd., appearing in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for Photogen Technologies, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 2001, into the Company's previously filed Form S-3, File
Number 333-46394.

                                       /s/ BDO International
                                           BDO International

Hamilton, Bermuda
April 15, 2002
#### § 77.1801 Overcurrent protection.

Trolley wires and trolley feeder wires shall be provided with overcurrent protection.
# C_2023068EN.01002301.xml

| 24.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/23

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 68/04)

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Routes concerned | Reggio Calabria – Bologna and return |
| Period of validity of the contract | From 27 May 2023 to 26 May 2025 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | Two months after the date of publication of this notice |
| Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained | National Civil Aviation Authority (ENAC) |
| Air transport and licensing department |
| Viale Castro Pretorio, 118 |
| 00185 Rome |
| ITALY |

Member State

Italy

Routes concerned

Reggio Calabria – Bologna and return

Period of validity of the contract

From 27 May 2023 to 26 May 2025

Deadline for submission of tenders

Two months after the date of publication of this notice

Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

National Civil Aviation Authority (ENAC)

Air transport and licensing department

Viale Castro Pretorio, 118

00185 Rome

ITALY

Tel. +39 0644596247

Email: osp@enac.gov.it

Internet: http://www.mit.gov.it

http://www.enac.gov.it

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 962 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 962

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to include firearms in the 
    types of property allowable under the alternative provision for 
                  exempting property from the estate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 2023

    Ms. Tenney (for herself, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Weber of Texas, and Mr. 
   Lamborn) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 11 of the United States Code to include firearms in the 
    types of property allowable under the alternative provision for 
                  exempting property from the estate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Gun Owners in Bankruptcy 
Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTIONS.

    Section 522 of title 11, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (d) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(13) The debtor's aggregate interest, not to exceed 
        $3,000 in value, in a single firearm or firearms.''; and
            (2) in subsection (f)(4)(A)--
                    (A) in clause (xiv) by striking ``and'' at the end;
                    (B) in clause (xv) by striking the period at the 
                end and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(xvi) The debtor's aggregate interest, not to exceed 
        $3,000 in value, in a single firearm or firearms.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.

    (a) Effective Date.--Except as provided in subsection (b), this Act 
and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Application of Amendments.--The amendments made by this Act 
shall apply only with respect to cases commenced under title 11 of the 
United States Code on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
_______________________________________ __ Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 127487 & (30)(31) Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. CONCERNED CITIZE NS OF ACME Stephen J. Markman, TOWNSHIP, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 127487 COA: 256403 Grand Traverse CC: 03-023264-CH ACME TOWNSHIP, ACME TOWNSHIP BOARD OF TRUSTEES, and ACME TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION, Defendants-Appellees,

and

VILLAGE AT GRAND TRAVERSE, L.L.C., Intervening Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motions to extend time to file reply briefs are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the October 15, 2004 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENI ED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0926 I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Mich igan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 29, 2005

Clerk
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Majority Opinion and 

Memorandum Dissenting Opinion filed March 14, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00641-CV

ELITE TOWNHOMES, LLC AND SOUHAIL H. ADAM, Appellants

V.

INTOWN CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 234th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2022-06530

MEMORANDUM DISSENTING OPINION

While I otherwise agree with reversing the trial court’s interlocutory order, 

there is no case in this court to remand to the trial court because this is an 

interlocutory appeal.

As Chief Justice Calvert famously wrote, “A correct draft of a judgment to

be included in an opinion which has been written with care should be the final 

challenge to the writing judge.” Robert W. Calvert, Appellate Court Judgments or 
2

Strange Things Happen on the Way to Judgment, 7 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 915, 925 

(1975). I dissent to the portion of this court’s judgment purporting to remand 

something that is not here.

/s/ Charles A. Spain

Justice

Panel consists of Justices Spain, Poissant, and Wilson (Spain, J., dissenting).
#### John McIver *v.*Warden, State Prison

*Louis S. Avitabile,*in support of the petition.

*Jacqueline J. Footman,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided October 22, 1992

The petitioner John Mclver’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 28 Conn. App. 195, is denied.
#### PALMER et al., Appellants, v. HICKORY GROVE CEMETERY et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 25, 1903.)

Action by Lizzie M. Palmer and others against the Hickory Grove Cemetery and another.

No opinion. Motion to resettle order denied.
#### § 872.33 How does OSM distribute and award certified in lieu funds?

(a) You must be certified under section 411(a) of SMCRA to receive certified in lieu funds.

(b) If you meet the eligibility requirement in paragraph (a) of this section, we distribute these certified in lieu funds to you as follows:

(1) Starting in the Federal fiscal year that begins on October 1, 2008, we annually distribute funds to you based on 50 percent of reclamation fees received for coal produced during the previous Federal fiscal year in your State or on Indian lands within your jurisdiction;

(2) The funds we annually distribute to you are in lieu of moneys we otherwise would distribute to you from State share funds under § 872.14 or Tribal share funds under § 872.17 had you not been excluded from receiving those funds under section 401(f)(3)(B) of SMCRA; and

(3) Subject to § 872.35, we annually distribute certified in lieu funds to you as shown in the following table:

| In the Federal fiscal year(s) beginning on . . . | The amount of certified in lieu funds we annually distribute to you will be equal to . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (i) October 1, 2008 | 25 percent of your 50 percent share of annual reclamation fee collections. |
| (ii) October 1, 2009 | 50 percent of your 50 percent share of annual reclamation fee collections. |
| (iii) October 1, 2010 | 75 percent of your 50 percent share of annual reclamation fee collections. |
| (iv) October 1, 2011, and thereafter | 100 percent of your 50 percent share of annual reclamation fee collections. |

(c) We award these funds to you in grants according to the provisions of part 885 of this chapter.

(d) At the same time we distribute certified in lieu funds to you under this section, we transfer the same amount to historic coal funds and make those funds available for annual grants under § 872.21 that same Federal fiscal year. We allocate, distribute, and award the transferred funds according to the provisions of §§ 872.21, 872.22, and 872.23.

(e) We will distribute to you the amounts we withhold under paragraph (b) of this section in two equal annual installments. We will do this in Federal fiscal years 2018 and 2019.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9891 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9891

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 765 West Old Route 66 in Ash Fork, Arizona, as the ``Fayrene Hume 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 1, 2024

   Mr. Crane (for himself, Mr. Biggs, and Mr. Gosar) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                             Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 765 West Old Route 66 in Ash Fork, Arizona, as the ``Fayrene Hume 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FAYRENE HUME POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 765 West Old Route 66 in Ash Fork, Arizona, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Fayrene Hume Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Fayrene 
Hume Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 843.14 Service of notices of violation, cessation orders, and show cause orders. ( a ) A notice of violation, cessation order, or show cause order shall be served on the person to whom it is directed or his or her designated agent promptly after issuance, as follows: ( 1 ) By tendering a copy at the coal exploration or surface coal mining and reclamation operation to the designated agent or to the individual who, based upon reasonable inquiry, appears to be in charge. If no such individual can be located at the site, a copy may be tendered to any individual at the site who appears to be an employee or agent of the person to whom the notice or order is issued. Service shall be complete upon tender of the notice or order and shall not be deemed incomplete because of refusal to accept.
( 2 ) As an alternative to paragraph (a)(1) of this section, service may be made by sending a copy of the notice or order by certified mail or by hand to the permittee or his or her designated agent, or by any means consistent with the rules governing service of a summons and complaint under rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Service shall be complete upon tender of the notice or order or of the certified mail and shall not be deemed incomplete because of refusal to accept.
( b ) Designation by any person of an agent for service of notices and orders shall be made in writing to the appropriate State or field office of the Office.
( c ) The Office shall furnish copies of notices and orders to the State regulatory authority, if any, promptly after their issuance. The Office may furnish copies to any person having an interest in the coal exploration, surface coal mining and reclamation operation, or the permit area.
[47 FR 35637, Aug. 16, 1982, as amended at 56 FR 28445, June 20, 1991]
PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1416-F

EFA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PLATE 7
ZUSGS OS ata convey Ws AK dt i 0, dn

EXPLANATION

© ESTIMATED BLOCK-AVERAGED HEAD—
Based on measurements from four or more
wells per block

—300— LINE OF EQUAL SIMULATED FRESHWATER
HYDRAULIC HEAD—Interval, in feet, is
variable. Datum is sea level

aa DEPTH-AVERAGED DISSOLVED-SOLIDS
CONCENTRATION—Equal to 10,000
milligrams per liter

---—-— DEPTH-AVERAGED DISSOLVED-SOLIDS
CONCENTRATION—Equal to 35,000
milligrams per liter

Model boundary

32°—

Study area comes eee

LOUISIANA
Downdip limit

a ty
|_| UY

3° 92° \ aA 3 .
hdl |

99
100° fleet

GULF OF MEXICO

Edge of Continental Shelf

i} 50 100 150 MILES

Base from U.S. Geological Survey
Scale 1:2,500,000 ti) 50 100 150 KILOMETERS

PLATE 7F. Estimated block-averaged and simulated 1982 freshwater hydraulic head:
Layer 6, upper Claiborne aquifer.

Alex K. Williamson and Hayes F. Grubb
2001
January 31 , 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

REUBEN COLBERT , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 00573

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This court today heard a motion for rehearing filed by appellant Rueben Colbert. We order that the former judgment of December 20 , 2012, be vacated, set aside, and annulled. We further order the Memorandum Opinion of December 20 , 2012, be withdrawn, as s tated in our Substitute Memorandum Opinion. This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

.

We fur ther order this decision certified below for observance.
**Custom er Servic**  **e Hotline: 1 -**  **800 -**  **438 -**  **2474 UNITED STA** 

**TES ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTION A**  **GENCY**

**REGION III 1650 A**  **rch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103**  **- 2029** 
April 30, 2012 The Honorable Randy

C. Huffman Secretary , West Virginia Department of Environmental Protec tion Division of Air Quality 601 57 th Street, SE Charleston, WV 25304

- 2943 Dear Secretary

Huffman : On March 13 , 2012 , the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the West Virginia State I mplementation Plan (SI P) from the Depar tment of Environmental Protection. Th is revision request s redesignation of the West Virginia portion of the Wheeling, WV

- OH 1997 PM 2.5 nonattainment area to att ainment and approval of the Area’s maintenance plan. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR). If members of y our staff have any questions, they

may direct them to Rose Quinto , Air Quality Planning Branch, at (215) 814

- 2 182 . She is th e principal contact for this rulemaking. Sincerely , /s/ Diana Esher, Director Air Protection Division

cc: John Benedict, WVDEP Fred Durham, WVDEP
Exhibit 3.2

AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS

of

QUESTAR CORPORATION

A Utah Corporation

OFFICES

        SECTION 1.  The principal office shall be in Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah.  The Corporation may also have an office at such other places as the Board of Directors may from time to time appoint or the business of the Corporation may require.  

SEAL

        SECTION 2.  The Corporation may, but is not required to, use a corporate seal. The corporate seal, if any, shall be inscribed with the name of the Corporation, the year of its organization, and the words "Corporate Seal, Utah."  The seal may be used by causing it, or a facsimile thereof, to be impressed, affixed or reproduced.  

STOCKHOLDERS' MEETINGS

        SECTION 3.  All meetings of the stockholders shall be held at the office of the Corporation in Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, State of Utah or any other location within the United States as the Board of Directors may fix.  

        SECTION 4.  The annual meeting of stockholders shall be held at such date and time as shall be designated from time to time by the Board of Directors and stated in the notice of the meeting, at which stockholders shall elect all directors as set forth in Section 15 and transact such other business as may properly be brought before the meeting.
§ 77.1710 Protective clothing; requirements. Each employee working in a surface coal mine or in the surface work areas of an underground coal mine shall be required to wear protective clothing and devices as indicated below: ( a ) Protective clothing or equipment and face-shields or goggles shall be worn when welding, cutting, or working with molten metal or when other hazards to the eyes exist.
( b ) Suitable protective clothing to cover the entire body when handling corrosive or toxic substances or other materials which might cause injury to the skin.
( c ) Protective gloves when handling materials or performing work which might cause injury to the hands; however, gloves shall not be worn where they would create a greater hazard by becoming entangled in the moving parts of equipment.
( d ) A suitable hard hat or hard cap when in or around a mine or plant where falling objects may create a hazard. If a hard hat or hard cap is painted, nonmetallic based paint shall be used.
( e ) Suitable protective footwear.
( f ) Snug-fitting clothing when working around moving machinery or equipment.
( g ) Safety belts and lines where there is danger of falling; a second person shall tend the lifeline when bins, tanks, or other dangerous areas are entered.
( h ) Lifejackets or belts where there is danger from falling into water.
( i ) Seatbelts in a vehicle where there is a danger of overturning and where roll protection is provided.
(Sec. 101(a), Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, as amended (83 Stat. 745; 30 U.S.C. 811(a))
[36 FR 9382, May 22, 1971, as amended at 36 FR 13143, July 15, 1971; 39 FR 7176, Feb. 25, 1974]