alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Dennis J. Allingham, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Lifecore Biomedical, Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Dated: May 9, 2005
    
    /s/ Dennis J. AllinghamPresident, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Director(principal executive officer)
I. ^^e ^ 

^ \p ^ c< ..- ( Vo,^ { [11-7--^Cl 

Adams, Kevin (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Adams, Kevin (OST) 

Tuesday, April 03, 2012 12:44 PM 'i \ I Mb: I! 0^ 

'Adak Administrator, Steve Mines'; 'AdMkCM^>^l(>fificent Tutiakoff; Adak, City Clerk; Adak, 

City Manager, Layton Lockett, 2012; Agafti?f^l^K0tfrAkutan Administration; Akutan Mayor, 

Joe Bereskin; Alaska DOT, Alaska Research Analyst, Kevin O'Sullivan; 'Alaska DOT, Brian 

Hanson'; Aleut Corp. Exec. Secetary,, AngelaJ^ourdukofsky; 'Aleut Corp., Dave Jensen'; 

Aleutians East Borough Admini^tratdl*, Bdj Ja6ttRerPAhn@4-Mountains.com; Atka Native 

Village (rosannamae@gci.net); Counsel in Washington D.C., James Drewry; Counsel, 

Washington D.C., Brad Gilman; Nikolski (NVNikolski@hotmail.com); Julie Dirks; Arnold 

Dushkin (ikotribeadmin@ak.net); Dora Johnson (danddclan@aol.com); Alaska DOT, Steven 

D. Hatter; Robert Cohn (robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com); Alaska DOT, Linda Bustamante ; 

Alaska DOT, Alaska Research Analyst, Kevin O'Sullivan 

FLYK0DIAK@YAH00.COM; tc91v@YAH00.COM; 'MTC World'; Grant Aviation, Bruce 

McGlasson; Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Request for Comment regarding EAS proposals at Atka and Nikolski, Alaska 

Atka & Nikolski EAS 2012-03-30.docx; Atka & Nikolski EAS 2012-03-30.xlsx; Aleutian 

Proposal for Servant Air.docx 

Dear Mr. Hatter, 

Attached above are copies of the proposals by Servant Air and by Grant Aviation to provide EAS at Atka and Nikolski, 

directly from the carrier and as reflected in the docket. Contrary to my earlier email, I will not be summarizing the 

proposals. The comments of the communities and state are a critically important element in our carrier selection 

decision. We ask that you get back to us, preferably by email, no later than April 30, 2012. We will docket this email, as 

well as any replies. 

In brief, look at the proposals, and if you have questions, call either of the carriers or me, and get back to us by the 

deadline. 

Best, 

Kevin Adams 

202-366-1047 ^ 

--S O 

u
SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (Adopted Oct. 5, 1979)(Amended March 7, 1980)(Amended Sept. 10, 1982) (Amended July 12, 1985)(Amended June 28, 1990) (Amended December 7, 1995) RULE 1313. PERMITS TO OPERATE (a) Change of Operator The Executive Officer or designee shall exempt from the provisions of this rule any facility which is a continuing operation, without modification or change in operating conditions, when a permit to operate is required solely because of permit renewal, change in operator, or a change in Rule 219 (Equipment Not Requiring a Permit). (b) No Permit to Construct Issued For new or modified sources or facilities which are constructed without the required Permit to Construct, the application for a Permit to Operate shall, for the purpose of this rule, be considered an application for a Permit to Construct. The Executive Officer or designee shall deny the Permit to Operate unless the new or modified facility complies with all provisions of Regulation XIII. All offsets must be obtained within 90 days after notice from the Executive Officer or designee that offsets are required. (c) Additional Offsets The Permit to Operate shall be denied if it is determined that actual emissions are greater than previously calculated when the Permit to Construct was issued, unless additional offsets are obtained within 90 days after notice from the Executive Officer or designee that offsets are required to mitigate the increase. (d) Start-Up For a new source or modification which will be a replacement, in whole or part, for an existing source on the same or contiguous property, a maximum of 90 days may be allowed as a start-up period for simultaneous operation of the subject sources. (e) Permit Conditions The Executive Officer or designee shall require as a condition for the issuance of any Permit to Operate for a new or modified facility, that the facility and any offset facility be operated consistent with any conditions imposed on their respective Permit to Construct. (f) Major Facility Permit Condition Limitation Relaxation Any major source that has taken a permit condition limiting a source's mass emissions in order to avoid NSR since August 1980 shall be subject to provisions of Regulation XIII if such permit condition is removed or relaxed in any way. (g) Emission Limitation Permit Conditions Every permit shall have the following conditions: SCAQMD 1313 - PERMITS TO OPERATE https://yosemite.epa.gov/r9/r9sips.nsf/AgencyProvision/5D340A87832...

1 of 2 6/8/2016 7:58 AMIdentified BACT conditions; 1. Monthly maximum emissions from the permitted source. 2. SCAQMD 1313 - PERMITS TO OPERATE https://yosemite.epa.gov/r9/r9sips.nsf/AgencyProvision/5D340A87832...

2 of 2 6/8/2016 7:58 AM
### §3355e. Judicial review

Nothing in this subchapter limits the protection afforded to any information under any other provision of law. This subchapter is not intended and may not be construed to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable against the United States, its agencies, its officers, or its employees. This subchapter does not modify in any way the substantive criteria or procedures for the classification of information, nor does this subchapter create any right or benefit subject to judicial review.

(Pub. L. 106–567, title VII, §707, Dec. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 2862.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly set out in a note under section 3161 of this title.
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Discovery Oil Ltd, a Delaware corporation, (the Company) hereby certifies to such officers knowledge that:  1. This quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date:  November 16, 2006 /s/ Andrew Ippolito ________________________________ Andrew Ippolito President, Director, and Chief Financial Officer
### §2791a. Laboratory-directed research and development

Of the funds made available by the Department of Energy for activities at government-owned, contractor-operated laboratories funded in this Act or subsequent Energy and Water Development Appropriations Acts, the Secretary may authorize a specific amount, not to exceed 8 percent of such funds, to be used by such laboratories for laboratory directed research and development: Provided, That the Secretary may also authorize a specific amount not to exceed 4 percent of such funds, to be used by the plant manager of a covered nuclear weapons production plant or the manager of the Nevada Site Office for plant or site directed research and development: Provided further, That notwithstanding Department of Energy order 413.2A, dated January 8, 2001, beginning in fiscal year 2006 and thereafter, all DOE laboratories may be eligible for laboratory directed research and development funding.

(Pub. L. 111–8, div. C, title III, §308, Mar. 11, 2009, 123 Stat. 626.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is div. C of Pub. L. 111–8, Mar. 11, 2009, 123 Stat. 601, known as the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2009. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the appropriation act cited as the credit to this section, and not as part of the Atomic Energy Defense Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Similar Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in the following appropriation acts:

Pub. L. 111–85, title III, §307, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2872.

Pub. L. 110–161, div. C, title III, §309, Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 1968.

Pub. L. 109–103, title III, §311, Nov. 19, 2005, 119 Stat. 2280.

#### Funding for Laboratory Directed Research and Development

Pub. L. 113–76, div. D, title III, §309, Jan. 17, 2014, 128 Stat. 175, provided that: "Notwithstanding section 307 of Public Law 111–85 [listed in a table above], of the funds made available by the Department of Energy for activities at Government-owned, contractor-operated laboratories funded in this [Act] [div. D of Pub. L. 113–76, see Tables for classification] or any subsequent Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act for any fiscal year, the Secretary may authorize a specific amount, not to exceed 6 percent of such funds, to be used by such laboratories for laboratory directed research and development."
Editorial Note on Part 701
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54929, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 701 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93319-93323, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 701.2 Objective. The regulations in this part give— ( a ) A general overview of the regulatory program to be implemented by the State or Federal regulatory authority;
( b ) The applicability of that program to coal exploration and surface coal mining and reclamation operations; and
( c ) The definitions that apply to the regulation of coal exploration and surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.704 Grounding frames of stationary high-voltage equipment receiving power from ungrounded delta systems.

[Statutory Provisions]

The frames of all stationary high-voltage equipment receiving power from ungrounded delta systems shall be grounded by methods approved by an authorized representative of the Secretary.
#### § 56.4000 Definitions.

The following definitions apply in this subpart.

*Flash point.* The minimum temperature at which sufficient vapor is released by a liquid to form a flammable vapor-air mixture near the surface of the liquid.

*Safety can.* A container of not over five gallons capacity that is designed to safely relieve internal pressure when exposed to heat and has a spring-closing lid and spout cover.

[50 FR 4054, Jan. 29, 1985, as amended at 68 FR 32361, May 30, 2003; 69 FR 38840, June 29, 2004]
Hwy 46 Project Draft EIS Chapter 5

279

Chapter 5 – List of Agencies, Governments, 

Organizations, and Individuals Given Notice of 

Availability

The agencies, governments, organizations, and individuals listed below were notified of the availability of 

the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS). A complete list of recipients, including names and 

contact information, is available in the Hwy 46 project file at the Detroit Ranger District.

Agencies and Governments

Bonneville Power Administration

City of Detroit

City of Idanha

Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde

Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians

Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs

Klamath Tribes

Linn County

Marion County

Office of Congressman Peter DeFazio

Office of Senator Jeff Merkley

Office of Senator Ron Wyden

Oregon Department of Environmental Quality

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

Oregon Department of Forestry

United States Environmental Protection Agency

United States Fish and Wildlife Service

Organizations

American Forest Resource Council

Benton Forest Coalition

Breitenbush Resort and Conference Center

Cascadia Wildlands Project

Chemeketans

Frank Lumber Company

Freres Lumber Company

Friends of the Breitenbush Cascades

Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics

Grow Santiam

North Santiam Watershed Council

Oregon Hunters Association

Oregon Wild

Pacific Crest Trail Association

Portland General Electric

Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation

WildEarth Guardians
Hwy 46 Project Draft EIS Chapter 5

280

Individuals

A complete list of recipients, including names and contact information, is available in the Hwy 46 project 

file at the Detroit Ranger District.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         168,631
<SECURITIES>                                   216,937
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,666
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               566,025
<PP&E>                                          77,363
<DEPRECIATION>                                  64,744
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,299,433
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          495,518
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       417,886
<OTHER-SE>                                     (38,958)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,299,433
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  531,030
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (770,775)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,772
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                216,973
<INCOME-TAX>                                    86,458
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            130,515
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                182,597
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   313,112
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 19, 2013

jam

Order 

Clerk

July 19, 2013

147435 (3)

THEODORE M. BELL, 

Plaintiff, 

v SC: 147435

AGC: 2122-11

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, 

Defendant.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $91.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court.

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$284.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in civil 

actions in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
§ 72.501 Emission limits for nonpermissible heavy-duty diesel-powered equipment, generators and compressors. ( a ) Each piece of nonpermissible heavy-duty diesel-powered equipment (as defined by § 75.1908(a) of this part), generator or compressor introduced into an underground area of an underground coal mine after May 21, 2001 must emit no more than 5.0 grams per hour of diesel particulate matter.
( b ) As of July 21, 2003, each piece of nonpermissible heavy-duty diesel-powered equipment (as defined by § 75.1908(a) of this part), generator or compressor operated in an underground area of an underground coal mine must emit no more than 5.0 grams per hour of diesel particulate matter.
( c ) As of January 19, 2005, each piece of nonpermissible heavy-duty diesel-powered equipment (as defined by § 75.1908(a) of this part), generator or compressor operated in an underground area of an underground coal mine must emit no more than 2.5 grams per hour of diesel particulate matter.
( d ) Notwithstanding the other provisions of this section, a generator or compressor that discharges its exhaust directly into intake air that is coursed directly to a return air course, or discharges its exhaust directly into a return air course, is not subject to the applicable requirements of this section.
[66 FR 5704, Jan. 19, 2001, as amended at 66 FR 15033, Mar. 15, 2001; 66 FR 27866, May 21, 2001]
#### Gloria Williams, Appellant, v Merchants National Bank and Trust Company of Syracuse, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, with costs, motion denied, and a new trial granted. Memorandum: On this appeal it appears that a husband pledged common stock standing solely in his wife’s name to the defendant Merchants National Bank & Trust Co. of Syracuse by signing her name to the certificates, to the stock powers and to the pledge. At the trial questions were raised regarding whether the plaintiff wife was the donee recipient of a gift from her stockbroker husband of the pledged securities and whether he was her authorized agent to pledge the stocks for a personal loan evidenced by promissory notes payable to the bank which he executed by signing both of their names. At the close of the proof the trial court nonsuited her and dismissed the complaint upon the ground that evidence on these issues was insufficient as a matter of law to create any issue of fact to be considered by the jury. We disagree. Upon the record before us, we conclude that a jury could rationally determine from the evidence that the husband made a completed gift of some or all of the securities in question to his wife and that she did not give him authority to pledge them as collateral for the $31,000 loan obtained by him from the defendant bank and converted to his own use. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga Supreme Court -dismiss complaint.) Present-Marsh, P. J., Cardamone, Dillon, Schnepp and Witmer, JJ.
### §3744. Metrics for Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program

The Secretary of Defense shall implement metrics to measure the impact and effectiveness of activities of the Program to address threats arising from the proliferation of chemical, nuclear, and biological weapons and weapons-related materials, technologies, and expertise.

(Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title XIII, §1344, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3606.)