alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         279,021
<SECURITIES>                                   331,109
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,666
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               677,796
<PP&E>                                          77,413
<DEPRECIATION>                                  61,914
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,395,701
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          509,157
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       417,886
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,652
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,395,701
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  417,009
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (625,677)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (18,857)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                189,811
<INCOME-TAX>                                    49,044
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            140,767
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                182,597
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   323,364
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
#### Daniel Madigan, appellee, v. George F. Nixon & Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,587.

Action to recover for damage to stock and business by boiler explosion. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. George A. Curran, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed April 3, 1925.

Alexander H. Marshall, for appellant; Frank G. Marshall, of counsel.

Schuyler, Ettelson & Weinfield, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §2538f. Earned value management and technology readiness levels for life extension programs

#### (a) Review of contractor earned value management systems

The Administrator shall enter into an arrangement with an independent entity under which that entity shall—

(1) review and validate whether the earned value management systems of contractors of the Administration for life extension programs meet the earned value management national standard; and

(2) conduct periodic surveillance reviews of such systems to ensure that such systems maintain compliance with that standard through program completion.

#### (b) Benchmarks for technology readiness levels

The Administrator shall—

(1) establish specific benchmarks for technology readiness levels of critical technologies for life extension programs at key decision points; and

(2) ensure that critical technologies meet such benchmarks at such decision points.

#### (c) Applicability

This section shall apply to programs that, as of January 1, 2021, have not entered phase 3 of the nuclear weapons acquisition process or phase 6.3 of a nuclear weapons life extension program.

#### (d) Definition

In this section, the term "earned value management national standard" means the most recent version of the EIA-748 Earned Value Management System Standard published by the National Defense Industrial Association.

(Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLII, §4224, as added Pub. L. 116–283, div. C, title XXXI, §3112(a), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4377.)
### §20163. Program authorized

(a) In General.—In order to carry out the purposes of this subchapter, the Administration, in cooperation with other Federal agencies, shall initiate and carry out a program of research, technology, monitoring, and other appropriate activities directed to understand the physics and chemistry of the upper atmosphere.

(b) Activities.—In carrying out the provisions of this subchapter, the Administration shall—

(1) arrange for participation by the scientific and engineering community, of both the Nation's industrial organizations and institutions of higher education, in planning and carrying out appropriate research, in developing necessary technology, and in making necessary observations and measurements;

(2) provide, by way of grant, contract, scholarships, or other arrangements, to the maximum extent practicable and consistent with other laws, for the widest practicable and appropriate participation of the scientific and engineering community in the program authorized by this subchapter; and

(3) make all results of the program authorized by this subchapter available to the appropriate regulatory agencies and provide for the widest practicable dissemination of such results.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3354.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20163 | 42 U.S.C. 2483. | Pub. L. 85–568, title IV, §403, as added Pub. L. 94–39, §8, June 19, 1975, 89 Stat. 222. |

Section
Editorial Note on Part 784
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54958, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 784 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93355, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 784.11 Operation plan: General requirements. Each application shall contain a description of the mining operations proposed to be conducted during the life of the mine within the proposed permit area, including, at a minimum, the following: ( a ) A narrative description of the type and method of coal mining procedures and proposed engineering techniques, anticipated annual and total production of coal, by tonnage, and the major equipment to be used for all aspects of those operations; and
( b ) A narrative explaining the construction, modification, use, maintenance, and removal of the following facilities (unless retention of such facility is necessary for postmining land use as specified in § 817.133): ( 1 ) Dams, embankments, and other impoundments;
( 2 ) Overburden and topsoil handling and storage areas and structures;
( 3 ) Coal removal, handling, storage, cleaning, and transportation areas and structures;
( 4 ) Spoil, coal processing waste, mine development waste, and non-coal waste removal, handling, storage, transportation, and disposal areas and structures;
( 5 ) Mine facilities; and
( 6 ) Water pollution control facilities.
[44 FR 15366, Mar. 13, 1979, as amended at 45 FR 51550, Aug. 4, 1980; 81 FR 93355, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54958, Nov. 17, 2017]
### §521. Establishment; construction, maintenance, and operation of public works and wind tunnels

The Secretary of the Air Force is authorized to establish an Air Engineering Development Center, and to construct, install, and equip (1) temporary and permanent public works, including housing accommodations and community facilities for military and civilian personnel, buildings, facilities, appurtenances, and utilities; and (2) wind tunnels in implementation of the unitary plan referred to in subchapter I of this chapter; and to maintain and operate the public works and wind tunnels authorized by this subchapter.

(Oct. 27, 1949, ch. 766, title II, §201, 63 Stat. 937.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       2,739,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               53,082,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,157,000
<INVENTORY>                                 62,491,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           118,354,000
<PP&E>                                      83,600,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              27,510,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             216,562,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       70,395,000
<BONDS>                                     99,670,000
<COMMON>                                        39,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,106,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               216,562,000
<SALES>                                    224,530,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           224,530,000
<CGS>                                      192,161,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              192,161,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            19,501,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,998,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,870,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   706,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,164,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,164,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .59
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.344


                                 PROMISSORY NOTE
                                  (NO INTEREST)

$110,210.00                   Glendale, California                 June 29, 2000




     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Paz Laroya (Payor") promises to pay in lawful money of
the United States of America to Pollution Research and Control Corp., a
California corporation ("Payee"), or order, at Glendale, California, the sum of
$110,210.00 Dollars from the date hereof on the unpaid principal payable in
installments of principal only in the sum of $100.00 Dollars commencing on July
15, 2000 and payable on the same day of each month thereafter until paid in
full.

     The unpaid principal may be prepaid without penalty. Each payment hereunder
shall be credited to the principal amount.

     If each installment under this note is not paid when due, the undersigned
shall pay all costs of collection thereof, including reasonable attorneys' fees,
whether or not suit or action is commenced to enforce payment of this note, and
Payee may, at its option, declare the entire amount of the then unpaid principal
immediately due and payable if such default is not cured within 10 days after
Payee provides the undersigned written notice of such default. The undersigned
hereby waives presentment, notice of dishonor and protest.

     This note is secured by shares of Payee's common stock, no par value (the
"Shares"), pursuant to a certain Stock Pledge Agreement, dated as of June 29,
2000 (the "Pledge Agreement").

     Upon the termination of employment of Payor as an employee of Payee for any
reason, the unpaid balance of this note shall be cancelled, and the pro rata
portion of Shares which then not fully paid for, shall be returned to Payee
pursuant to the terms of the Pledge Agreement.

                                       Payor:



                                       /s/ Paz Laroya
                                       ----------------------------------
                                       (Signature)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6257
CHARLES ARTHUR BENNETT, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; W. K. JONES, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-95-226-5-BO) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: July 31, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Arthur Bennett, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1217. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Bennett v. Department of Corrections , No. CA-95-226-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 13, 1995). We deny Appellant's motions for default judgment and for writ of habeas corpus, for court order, and for injunctive relief.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Editorial Note on Part 816
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54979, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 816 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93392, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 816.45 Hydrologic balance: Sediment control measures. ( a ) Appropriate sediment control measures shall be designed, constructed, and maintained using the best technology currently available to: ( 1 ) Prevent, to the extent possible, additional contributions of sediment to streamflow or to runoff outside the permit area,
( 2 ) Meet the more stringent of applicable State or Federal effluent limitations,
( 3 ) Minimize erosion to the extent possible.
( b ) Sediment control measures include practices carried out within and adjacent to the disturbed area. The sedimentation storage capacity of practices in and downstream from the disturbed area shall reflect the degree to which successful mining and reclamation techniques are applied to reduce erosion and control sediment. Sediment control measures consist of the utilization of proper mining and reclamation methods and sediment control practices, singly or in combination. Sediment control methods include but are not limited to— ( 1 ) Disturbing the smallest practicable area at any one time during the mining operation through progressive backfilling, grading, and prompt revegetation as required in § 816.111(b);
( 2 ) Stabilizing the backfill material to promote a reduction in the rate and volume of runoff, in accordance with the requirements of § 816.102;
( 3 ) Retaining sediment within disturbed areas;
( 4 ) Diverting runoff away from disturbed areas;
( 5 ) Diverting runoff using protected channels or pipes through disturbed areas so as not to cause additional erosion;
( 6 ) Using straw dikes, riprap, check dams, mulches, vegetative sediment filters, dugout ponds, and other measures that reduce overland flow velocity, reduce runoff volume, or trap sediment; and
( 7 ) Treating with chemicals.
[44 FR 15395, Mar. 13, 1979, as amended at 48 FR 44780, Sept. 30, 1983; 81 FR 93392, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54979, Nov. 17, 2017]
### §435b. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 435b, comprising section 3001 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, Pub. L. 108–458, was editorially reclassified as section 3341 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 777
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54947, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 777 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93326-93327, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 777.13 Reporting of technical data. ( a ) All technical data submitted in the application shall be accompanied by the names of persons or organizations that collected and analyzed the data, dates of the collection and analysis of the data, and descriptions of the methodology used to collect and analyze the data.
( b ) Technical analyses shall be planned by or under the direction of a professional qualified in the subject to be analyzed.
[48 FR 44398, Sept. 28, 1983, as amended at 81 FR 93327, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54947, Nov. 17, 2017]
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.800-4 Testing, examination, and maintenance of circuit breakers; record. ( a ) *Recordkeeping.* The operator shall make a record of each test, examination, repair, or adjustment of all circuit breakers protecting high-voltage circuits which enter any underground area of the mine.
( b ) *Record security.* These records shall be made in a secure book that is not susceptible to alteration or electronically in a computer system so as to be secure and not susceptible to alteration.
( c ) *Retention and access.* These records shall be retained at a surface location at the mine for at least one year and shall be made available to authorized representatives of the Secretary, the representative of miners, and other interested persons.
[64 FR 43287, Aug. 10, 1999]
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Wages, Hours and Working Conditions in the Set-Up Paper-Box Industry 1933, 1934, and 1935

              																	Baril, Victor S.					,	Jones, Frances M. (Frances Mary)					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Wages, Hours and Working Conditions in the Set-Up Paper-Box Industry 1933, 1934, and 1935 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 633*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. G.P.O., 										June 1937,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4147,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### In the Matter of Arthur M. Goldberg, an Attorney, Respondent. Bar Association of Nassau County, New York, Inc., Petitioner.

In a proceeding to discipline respondent, an attorney, upon two charges: (1) that he failed to honor a retainer agreement and to return a fee which he received; and (2) that he failed and refused to take any action to procure a retail beer license pursuant to such retainer, the Referee to whom the issues were referred for hearing has submitted his report in which he finds respondent guilty upon the first charge and not guilty upon the second charge. The petitioner now moves to confirm the Referee’s report and findings. The motion is granted; *911the Referee’s report and findings are confirmed. The charge upon which respondent has been found guilty warrants disciplinary action. However, it appears that upon another unrelated charge of professional misconduct in the First Judicial Department, respondent was recently suspended from the practice of law; he was suspended on March 3, 1963 by the Appellate Division in that Department for a period of two years *(Matter of Goldberg,*18 A D 2d 188). Upon the expiration of such suspension on March 3, 1965, respondent will be required to apply to the said Appellate Division for his reinstatement as a member of the Bar. Accordingly, at this time we find it unnecessary to further discipline respondent upon the charge on which he was found guilty in this Department. Under the circumstances, we deem it proper to now refer the entire record of the disciplinary proceeding in this court to the Appellate Division in the First Department for its use in connection with any application for reinstatement which the respondent may subsequently make. Beldoek, P. J., Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### McSORLEY, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 16, 1903.)

Action by Charles McSorley, as administrator, against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs.
§ 865.11 Protected activity. ( a ) No person shall discharge or in any other way discriminate against or cause to be fired or discriminated against any employee or any authorized representative of employees because that employee or representative has— ( 1 ) Filed, instituted or caused to be filed or instituted any proceedings under the Act by— ( i ) Reporting alleged violations or dangers to the Secretary, the State Regulatory Authority, or the employer or his representative.
( ii ) Requesting an inspection or investigation; or
( iii ) Taking any other action which may result in a proceeding under the Act.
( 2 ) Made statements, testified, or is about to do so— ( i ) In any informal or formal adjudicatory proceeding;
( ii ) In any informal conference proceeding;
( iii ) In any rulemaking proceeding;
( iv ) In any investigation, inspection or other proceeding under the Act;
( v ) In any judicial proceeding under the Act.
( 3 ) Has exercised on his own behalf or on behalf of others any right granted by the Act.
( b ) Each employer conducting operations which are regulated under this Act, shall within 30 days from the effective day of these regulations, provide a copy of this part to all current employees and to all new employees at the time of their hiring.
[42 FR 62712, Dec. 13, 1977; 43 FR 2722, Jan. 19, 1978. Redesignated at 44 FR 15312, Mar. 13, 1979]
§ 585.426 When must I submit my request for renewal? ( a ) You must request a renewal from BOEM: ( 1 ) No later than 180 days before the termination date of your limited lease or grant.
( 2 ) No later than two years before the termination date of the operations period of your commercial lease.
( b ) You must submit to BOEM all information we request pertaining to your lease or grant and your renewal request.
### Part F—Period of Service for Annuities
### §404n–2. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 404n–2, comprising section 343 of the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003, Pub. L. 107–306, was editorially reclassified as section 3363 of this title.