alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023165EN.01001301.xml

| 10.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/13

---

Notice on the availability of areas in Austria for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons

(2023/C 165/06)

With reference to Article 3(3) of Directive 94/22/EC (1), the Federal Minister for Finance of the Republic of Austria hereby gives notice that, in accordance with the Mineral Raw Materials Act (Federal Law Gazette (BGBl.) I No 38/1999), as last amended by the Federal Act published in BGBl. I No 60/2022, the whole national territory of the Republic of Austria is available on a permanent basis within the meaning of Article 3(3) provided that there are no existing prospection, production and storage contracts relating to hydrocarbons, or existing mining rights which also include hydrocarbons. For detailed information on this matter, please contact the Federal Ministry of Finance, Section VI – Telecommunications, Postal Services and Mining, Denisgasse 31, 1200 Vienna.

This notice replaces the notice from the Republic of Austria published in the
  Official Journal of the European Union C 111 of 3 April 2020, page 3.

---

(1)  Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons (OJ L 164, 30.6.1994, p. 3).

---
# C_2023123EN.01000201.xml

| 5.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/2

---

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration

(Case M.11085 – FRASERS / GO SPORT)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 123/02)

On 21 March 2023, the European Commission received notification (1) of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) (‘Merger Regulation’).

On 30 March 2023, the notifying party informed the Commission that it withdrew its notification.

---

(1)  OJ C 114, 29.3.2023, p. 8.

(2)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.1713-4 First-aid training program; availability of instruction to all miners.

On or before June 30, 1971, each operator of an underground coal mine shall make available to all miners employed in the mine a course of instruction in first-aid conducted by the operator or under the auspices of the operator, and such a course of instruction shall be made available to newly employed miners within 6 months after the date of employment.
"Kim & Ken Feil" <kimfeil@sbcglobal.net>
08/09/2010 12:59 PM To CCG-ONG@EPA

cc
bcc
Subject comments from public on gas well permitting

**1. PBR loophole....lower the 25 ton VOC per year threshold to 25lbs per year so that all pollution sources regardless of size are mandated to control emissions.**  **2. Do not allow grandfathering in of existing permits because these gas well sites are in around 2000 in DFW urban areas and number 13,000 to 15,000 which greatly affect our air quality and attainment goals to the federal government. These ppb goals are only getting stricter and this is**  **necessary to have realistic goals to attain in meeting these lower ppb thresholds. 3. Area source categories and major source categories need to ALL utilize emission controls at every stage of oil & gas production for all**  **equipment and Opportunity sources which include ramped up maintenance and inspections .**  **4. Aged equipment needs to be updated for the best technology available in area source and major source categories.**
### **CHAPTER 19—GUIDED MISSILES**

Sec.
501.
Establishment of long-range proving ground for guided missiles and other weapons; jurisdiction of Secretary of the Air Force; use by all Services.
502.
Acquisition of land.
503.
Authorization of appropriations.
504.
Delegation of authority by Secretary of Defense; contributions for support.
### §404. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 404, comprising section 107 of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as section 3042 of this title. Section 3042 of this title was subsequently repealed by Pub. L. 116–92, div. E, title LXVII, §6742(b)(3), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2240.
EXHIBIT 21.1


<TABLE>
                                       SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



<CAPTION>
                                                 Jurisdiction of       Name Under Which Subsidiary Does
Entity                                           Organization          Business
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                              <C>                   <C>
General Communication, Inc.                      Alaska                GCI, General Communication, Inc.

GCI Communication Corp.                          Alaska                GCC, GCI Communication Corp.

GCI Communication Services, Inc.                 Alaska                GCI Communication Services

GCI Leasing Co., Inc.                            Alaska                GCI Leasing, GCI Leasing Co.

GCI Cable, Inc.                                  Alaska                GCI Cable, GCI Cable, Inc.

</TABLE>




                                                         REGISTRATION STATEMENT
                                                                         II-626
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Executive Officer  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DRS Technologies, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Schneider, Chief Financial Officer of DRS Technologies, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|Date: November 14, 2003 |  | By: | /s/RICHARD A. SCHNEIDERRichard A. Schneider Chief Financial Officer
|----------------------- |  | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------

35

---

QuickLinks
### §71301. Common docking system standard to enable rescue

In order to maximize the ability to rescue astronauts whose space vehicles have become disabled, the Administrator shall enter into discussions with the appropriate representatives of spacefaring nations who have or plan to have crew transportation systems capable of orbital flight or flight beyond low Earth orbit for the purpose of agreeing on a common docking system standard.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3439.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 71301 | 42 U.S.C. 17734. | Pub. L. 110–422, title IV, §407, Oct. 15, 2008, 122 Stat. 4790. |

Section
### §104908. Bows in parks

(a) Definition of Not Ready for Immediate Use.—The term "not ready for immediate use" means—

(1) a bow or crossbow, the arrows of which are secured or stowed in a quiver or other arrow transport case; and

(2) with respect to a crossbow, uncocked.

(b) Vehicular Transportation Authorized.—The Director shall not promulgate or enforce any regulation that prohibits an individual from transporting bows and crossbows that are not ready for immediate use across any System unit in the vehicle of the individual if—

(1) the individual is not otherwise prohibited by law from possessing the bows and crossbows;

(2) the bows or crossbows that are not ready for immediate use remain inside the vehicle of the individual throughout the period during which the bows or crossbows are transported across System land; and

(3) the possession of the bows and crossbows is in compliance with the law of the State in which the System unit is located.

(Added Pub. L. 116–9, title II, §2409(a), Mar. 12, 2019, 133 Stat. 751.)
§ 886.11 Who is eligible for a grant? You are eligible for grants under this part if: ( a ) You are a State or Indian tribe with a reclamation plan approved under part 884 of this chapter; and
( b ) You have not certified that all known coal problems in your State or on Indian lands in your jurisdiction have been addressed.
§ 586.103 What are BOEM's responsibilities under this part? ( a ) BOEM will ensure that any activities authorized in this part are carried out in a manner that provides for: ( 1 ) Safety;
( 2 ) Protection of the environment;
( 3 ) Prevention of waste;
( 4 ) Conservation of the natural resources of the OCS;
( 5 ) Coordination with relevant Federal agencies (including, in particular, those agencies involved in planning activities that are undertaken to avoid conflicts among users and to maximize the economic and ecological benefits of the OCS, including multifaceted spatial planning efforts);
( 6 ) Protection of National security interests of the United States;
( 7 ) Protection of the rights of other authorized users of the OCS;
( 8 ) A fair return to the United States;
( 9 ) Prevention of interference with reasonable uses (as determined by the Secretary or Director) of the exclusive economic zone, the high seas, and the territorial seas;
( 10 ) Consideration of the location of and any schedule relating to a grant under this part for an area of the OCS, and any other use of the sea or seabed;
( 11 ) Public notice and comment on any proposal submitted for a grant under this part; and
( 12 ) Oversight, research, and monitoring of activities authorized by a grant under this part.
( b ) BOEM will require compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, other requirements, and the terms of your grant and approved plans under this part. BOEM will approve, disapprove, or approve with conditions any plans, applications, or other documents submitted to BOEM for approval under the provisions of this part.
( c ) Unless otherwise provided in this part, BOEM may give oral directives or decisions whenever prior BOEM approval is required under this part. BOEM will document in writing any such oral directives within 10 business days.
( d ) BOEM will establish practices and procedures to govern the collection of all payments due to the Federal Government, including any cost recovery fees, rents, operating fees, and other fees or payments. BOEM will do this in accordance with the terms of this part, the grant under this part, and applicable Office of Natural Resources Revenue (ONRR) regulations or guidance.
( e ) BOEM will provide for coordination and consultation with the Governor of any State, the executive of any local government, and the executive of any Indian Tribe that may be affected by a grant issued under this part. BOEM may invite any affected State Governor, representative of an affected Indian Tribe, and affected local government executive to join in establishing a task force or other joint planning or coordination agreement in carrying out our responsibilities under this part.
#### ROGERS et al., Appellants, v. MAYOR, ETC., OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 10, 1905.)

Action by John O. Rogers and others against the mayor, etc., of New York. L. L. Kellogg, for appellant. T. Connoly, for respondent. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
#### § 905.824 Special performance standards—Mountaintop removal.

Part 824 of this chapter, Special Permanent Program Performance Standards—Mountaintop Removal, shall apply to any person who conducts surface coal mining and reclamation operations constituting mountaintop removal mining.
### §2576. Information relating to certain defense nuclear nonproliferation programs

#### (a) Technologies and capabilities

The Administrator shall document, for efforts that are not focused on basic research, the technologies and capabilities of the defense nuclear nonproliferation research and development program that—

(1) are transitioned to end users for further development or deployment; and

(2) are deployed.

#### (b) Assessments of status

(1) In assessing projects under the defense nuclear nonproliferation research and development program or the defense nuclear nonproliferation and arms control program, the Administrator shall compare the status of each such project, including with respect to the final results of such project, to the baseline targets and goals established in the initial project plan of such project.

(2) The Administrator may carry out paragraph (1) using a common template or such other means as the Administrator determines appropriate.

(Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLIII, §4310, as added Pub. L. 115–91, div. C, title XXXI, §3114(a), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1885.)
_ PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1411-B
a USGS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Hydraulic conductivity and transmissivity of the Paradox-Eagle Valley subunit—PLATE 4
Geldon, A.L., 2002, Hydrologic properties and ground-water flow systems of the Paleozoic rocks in the Upper
science fora changing world U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Colorado River Basin in Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming, excluding the San Juan Basin

EXPLANATION

fas Area where the Paradox-Eagle Valley subunit is missing because of erosion
or nondeposition

Unit-Averaged Hydraulic Conductivity
Relative unit-averaged hydraulic conductivity

Moderate

Small

—o0i— Line of equal estimated unit-averaged hydraulic conductivity—Location is
approximate. Interval, in feet per day, is variable

—— _ Limit of data

Data sites

e Site at which unit-averaged hydraulic conductivity was estimated from hydraulic
conductivity of intervals in a borehole. Interval hydraulic-conductivity values
were calculated from transmissivity values determined from slug tests

a Site at which unit-averaged hydraulic conductivity was estimated from

permeability values obtained from drill-stem tests or laboratory measurements

for borehole intervals representative of the Paradox-Eagle Valley subunit
where the data were obtained

Composite Transmissivity
Relative composite transmissivity

fp | Moderate

Small

——10— Line of equal estimated composite transmissivity—Location is approximate.
Interval, in feet squared per day, is variable

—_ Limit of data

BOUNDARY OF . S 4 BOUNDARY OF
UPPER COLORADO , 07° UPPER COLORADO
RIVER BASIN .

a RIVER BASIN

AREA EXCLUDED FROM STUDY

}

7 | AREA EXCLUDED FROM STUDY
_—/ 107° rs

2 . Pa: ms NO|DATA “4 i; -_ vor

1:2,000,000 1:2,000,000
: id in iP ie MILES | 28 i . 8 18 MILES
UNIT-AVERAGED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY COMPOSITE TRANSMISSIVITY
ae UNIT-AVERAGED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY AND COMPOSITE TRANSMISSIVITY OF THE PARADOX-EAGLE VALLEY SUBUNIT OF THE FOUR CORNERS CONFINING UNIT
IN THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN AND VICINITY IN ARIZONA, COLORADO, NEW MEXICO, UTAH, AND WYOMING

By
Arthur L. Geldon
2002
### §20305. National Academies decadal surveys

(a) In General.—The Administrator shall enter into agreements on a periodic basis with the National Academies for independent assessments, also known as decadal surveys, to take stock of the status and opportunities for Earth and space science discipline fields and Aeronautics research and to recommend priorities for research and programmatic areas over the next decade.

(b) Independent Cost Estimates.—The agreements described in subsection (a) shall include independent estimates of the life cycle costs and technical readiness of missions assessed in the decadal surveys whenever possible.

(c) Reexamination.—The Administrator shall request that each National Academies decadal survey committee identify any conditions or events, such as significant cost growth or scientific or technological advances, that would warrant the Administration asking the National Academies to reexamine the priorities that the decadal survey had established.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3357.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20305 | 42 U.S.C. 17823. | Pub. L. 110–422, title XI, §1104, Oct. 15, 2008, 122 Stat. 4809. |

Section

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Implementation of Decadal Survey's Recommended Decision Rules

Pub. L. 112–55, div. B, title III, Nov. 18, 2011, 125 Stat. 622, provided in part: "That NASA shall implement the recommendations of the most recent National Research Council planetary decadal survey and shall follow the decadal survey's recommended decision rules regarding program implementation, including a strict adherence to the recommendation that NASA include in a balanced program a flagship class mission, which may be executed in cooperation with one or more international partners, if such mission can be appropriately de-scoped and all NASA costs for such mission can be accommodated within the overall funding levels appropriated by Congress".
AMENDMENT TO SUBLEASE AND CONSENT TO SUBLEASE

      This Amendment to Sublease and Consent to Sublease ("Amendment No. 1")
between United Consulting Group, Inc. ("Sublessee") and Techdyne, Inc.
("Sublessor") dated August 23, 1999, together with Addendum to Sublease between
Techdyne, Inc. and United Consulting Group, Inc. dated August 23, 1999
("Sublease");

     WHEREAS, Sublessee entered into the Sublease with Sublessor under a lease
between Sublessor and EGP Houston Partners, Ltd. ("Lessor") dated April 29, 1997
("Prime Lease"); and

     WHEREAS, Sublessee has represented it has a sister company, United
Computing Group, Inc., into which Sublessee has merged all of its business; and

     WHEREAS, Sublessee and United Computing Group, Inc. request that United
Computing Group, Inc. be added to the Sublease as an additional Sublessee, with
the consent of Sublessor and Lessor.

     NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, and based upon the
mutual promises contained herein, the parties, intending to be legally bound
hereby, agree as follows:

     1. The preamble to this Amendment No. 1 is incorporated herein by reference
as if set forth in full in this Section 1.

     2. United Computing Group, Inc. is hereby added as a Sublessee under the
Sublease, and all references to Sublessee in the Sublease includes United
Computing Group, Inc.; provided nothing in this Amendment No. 1 is deemed to
relieve United Consulting Group, Inc., the original Sublessee, from its
responsibilities as a Sublessee under the Sublease.

     3. United Computing Group, Inc. agrees to be fully bound under and
responsible for all the terms and provisions of the Sublease.

     4. Other than adding United Computing Group, Inc. as a Sublessee as
provided for in this Amendment No. 1, all the other terms and provisions of the
Sublease shall remain in full force and effect, and are not otherwise modified
or amended.

SUBLESSEE:                             LESSOR:

UNITED CONSULTING GROUP, INC.          TECHDYNE, INC.

   /s/ Keyvan Casey                       /s/ Barry Pardon

By:---------------------------------   By:----------------------------------
   KEVAN CASEY, President                 BARRY PARDON, President

UNITED COMPUTING GROUP, INC.

   /s/ Keyvan Casey

By:---------------------------------
   KEVAN CASEY, President

<PAGE>

                LANDLORD'S CONSENT TO AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SUBLEASE

     The undersigned Lessor of the Prime Lease hereby consents to the foregoing
Amendment No. 1 to the Sublease without waiver or restriction in the Prime
Lease concerning further amendments, assignments or subletting.

                                       EastGroup Properties, L.P.
                                       successor to, EGP Houston Partners, Ltd.

                                          /s/ Brent Wood

                                       By:-------------------------------
                                       Title: Vice President
                                       Date:  2-14-01
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-40124

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE LUIS ACUNA-GARZA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:17-CR-615-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luis AcunaGarza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Acuna-Garza has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 11, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-40124 Document: 00514637273 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/11/2018
No. 18-40124

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-40124 Document: 00514637273 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/11/2018
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > P.W.A. and Industry: A Four-Year Study of Regenerative Employment. 1938

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*P.W.A. and Industry: A Four-Year Study of Regenerative Employment. 1938 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 658*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. G.P.O., 										1938,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4168,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER