alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER****Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     I, Denise Barton, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary ofAmerican Casino & Entertainment Properties LLC, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Casino & EntertainmentProperties LLC (the “Registrant”) for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”);     2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this Report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;     4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     By: /s/ Denise Barton Denise Barton
---

---

Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-3, No.
333-12074, No. 333-115598, No. 333-117954 and No. 333-150197 of RADA Electronic Industries
Ltd. and in the related Prospectuses and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8, No.
333-12844 and No. 333-111437 pertaining to RADA Electronic Industries Ltd.s 1999 and
2003 Stock Option Plans, and warrants to directors of our report dated March 30, 2009,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of RADA Electronic Industries Ltd.
included in the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008.

| |  | /s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
Kost Forer Gabbay & KasiererA Member of Ernst & Young Global
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tel Aviv, April 1, 2009



---

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph M., Appellant.

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County, imposed August 9, 1978, upon his adjudication as a youthful offender, the sentence being an indeterminate term of imprisonment with a maximum of three years. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to a five-year period of probation and case remanded to Criminal Term to fix the terms and conditions of probation. The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Martuscello, J. P., Latham, Titone and Suozzi, JJ., concur.
#### Maggie MORGAN, Petitioner, v. Dr. George J. BETO, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, and Velda Dobbs, Respondents. Joseph F. SELBY, Sr., Petitioner, v. Dr. George J. BETO, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent.

Civ. A. Nos. 69-H-779, 69-H-780.

United States District Court, S. D. Texas, Houston Division.

June 10, 1970.

*1266Kermit Waters, Ozark, Ala., and Sam Wilson, Houston, Tex., for petitioners.

Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen., and Sam Robertson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for respondents.

•MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NOEL, District Judge.

Petitioners, prisoners in state custody, filed applications for the writ of habeas corpus. This Court dismissed same by reason of petitioners’ failure to exhaust state remedies upon each of their several claims for relief. Morgan v. Beto, Civil No. 69-H-779, Selby v. Beto, Civil No. 69-H-780 (S.D.Tex., May 8, 1970). Petitioners now seek a certificate of probable cause to appeal. Alternatively, they ask that the prior judgment be vacated conditional upon petitioners’ amending their applications to include only those issues properly raised in the state courts. Because of petitioner Morgan’s failing health, this motion is taken up out of time in order to effect a prompt disposition of the case. *See generally:*Fed.Dist.Ct.S.D.Tex. Local Rules 24 and 25; *see specifically:*Local Rule 25f.

Petitioners correctly point out that federal courts in habeas corpus have *the power*to hear claims selectively, ruling upon properly exhausted grounds and refusing to rule upon those not exhausted. However, beyond the issue of power, considerations of comity and judicial economy are of fundamental importance in the area of the exhaustion requirement. In Wheeler v. Beto, 407 F.2d 816, 817 (5th Cir. 1969) (per curiam), the Court of Appeals articulated this policy:

> While it is true that appellant has exhausted his state remedies as to the other issues presented in his petition, considerations of comity dictate against having his case pending in state and federal courts at the same time. Moreover, we believe that considerations of judicial efficiency dictate against piecemeal litigation of petitioner’s claims in federal court.

 For the reasons above, insistence upon complete exhaustion of state remedies as to all issues is a proper exercise of the Court's discretion. Likewise, for the reasons stated above, petitioners’ *1267alternative ground for relief is without merit. Although not in issue, petitioners should note that a deliberate “bypass” of presently available state remedies could cause a permanent forfeiture of all presently alleged grounds for relief not raised in state habeas corpus proceedings. Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391 at 438, 83 S.Ct. 822, 9 L.Ed.2d 837 (1963); Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 58 S.Ct. 1019, 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); *cf.:*Kaufman v. United States, 394 U.S. 217, 227 n. 8, 89 S.Ct. 1068, 22 L.Ed.2d 227 (1969).

Accordingly, it is ordered that:

Petitioners’ motion for a certificate of probable cause, or alternative relief, is denied.
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | The Form 10-Q, as amended by the Amendment, of Donaldson Company, Inc. for the quarter ended April 30, 2019 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | The information contained in the Report, as amended by the Amendment, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Donaldson Company, Inc. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
| Date:  | December 6, 2019 |  /s/ Tod E. Carpenter |
|   |   | Tod E. CarpenterChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | The Form 10-Q, as amended by the Amendment, of Donaldson Company, Inc. for the quarter ended April 30, 2019 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | The information contained in the Report, as amended by the Amendment, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Donaldson Company, Inc. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
| Date:  | December 6, 2019 |  /s/ Scott J. Robinson |
|   |   | Scott J. RobinsonSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Map 1-2:

Surface Management

0 20 40 60 80

Kilometers

0 20 40 60 80

Miles

1

Bankhead Jones

Bureau of Land Management

Bureau of Reclamation

Military Reservations

Fish & Wildlife Service

Forest Service

National Grasslands

National Park Service

Other Federal Agencies

Private

State

State/City/County Wildlife and

Recreation Areas

LUP Amendments Planning Area

Boundary

BLM Field Office Boundaries

Forest Service Planning Unit

Boundaries

Sage Grouse Priority Habitat

Management Area (Core)

Sage Grouse Priority Habitat

Management Area (Connectivity)

County Boundaries

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Final Environmental Impact Statement - May 2015

W Y O M I N G

M T

I D

M A P A R E A

Crook

Weston

Sundance

Rock Springs

Field Office

§ ̈¦80

U T

C O

N E

S D

Newcastle

Lusk

Douglas

Casper

Cheyenne

Wheatland Torrington

Laramie

Rawlins

Rock Springs

Green River

Evanston

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Rawlins Field Offi ce

Casper Field Offi ce

Newcastle

Field Office

Pinedale

Field Office

Kemmerer

Field Office

Bridger -

Teton

N.F.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine Bow

N.F.

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

Platte

G

o

s

h

e

n

Alb

a

n

y

L

a

r

a

mie

C

o

n

v

e

r

s

e

Nio

b

r

a

r

a

Nat rona

Carbon

S

w

e

etw

ate

r

C

a

r

b

o

n

Sublette

Lincoln

T

eto

n

Fr

e

m

o

nt

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments
§ 90.103 Compensation. ( a ) The operator shall compensate each part 90 miner at not less than the regular rate of pay received by that miner immediately before exercising the option under § 90.3.
( b ) Whenever a part 90 miner is transferred, the operator shall compensate the miner at not less than the regular rate of pay received by that miner immediately before the transfer.
( c ) Once a miner has been placed in a position in compliance with the provisions of part 90, paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section do not apply when the part 90 miner initiates and accepts a change in work assignment for reasons of job preference.
( d ) The operator shall compensate each miner who is a section 203(b) miner on January 31, 1981, at not less than the regular rate of pay that the miner is required to receive under section 203(b) of the Act immediately before the effective date of this part.
( e ) In addition to the compensation required to be paid under paragraphs (a), (b), and (d) of this section, the operator shall pay each part 90 miner the actual wage increases that accrue to the classification to which the miner is assigned.
( f ) If a miner is temporarily employed in an occupation other than his or her regular work classification for two months or more before exercising the option under § 90.3, the miner's regular rate of pay for purposes of paragraph (a) and (b) of this section is the higher of the temporary or regular rates of pay. If the temporary assignment is for less than two months, the operator may pay the part 90 miner at his or her regular work classification rate regardless of the temporary wage rate.
( g ) If a part 90 miner is transferred, and the Secretary subsequently notifies the miner that notice of the miner's eligibility to exercise the part 90 option was incorrect, the operator shall retain the affected miner in the current position to which the miner is assigned and continue to pay the affected miner the applicable rate of pay provided in paragraphs (a), (b), (d), and (e) of this section, until: ( 1 ) The affected miner and operator agree in writing to a position with pay at not less than the regular rate of pay for that occupation; or
( 2 ) A position is available at the same coal mine in both the same occupation and on the same shift on which the miner was employed immediately before exercising the option under § 90.3 or under the old section 203(b) program (36 FR 20601, October 27, 1971). ( i ) When such a position is available, the operator shall offer the available position in writing to the affected miner with pay at not less than the regular rate of pay for that occupation.
( ii ) If the affected miner accepts the available position in writing, the operator shall implement the miner's reassignment upon notice of the miner's acceptance. If the miner does not accept the available position in writing, the miner may be reassigned and protections under part 90 shall not apply. Failure by the miner to act on the written offer of the available position within 15 days after notice of the offer is received from the operator shall operate as an election not to accept the available position.
#### § 77.313 Wet-coal feedbins; low-level indicators.

Wet-coal bins feeding thermal drying systems shall be equipped with both audible and visual low-coal-level indicators.
-88 -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

34 36 38 40 42



### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 08/03 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 03 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL
#### 14 Second Avenue Realty Corp., Respondent, v. Anne Steven Corp. et al., Appellants.

Judgment entered on November 30, 1961 and order entered August 31, 1961, unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of granting judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against defendants for damages in the sum of $2,366.67 for the period beginning February 8, 1961 and ending June 30, 1961 at the rate of $500 per month, and, the judgment and order as so modified, affirmed, without costs. The action is in form one to recover for the use and occupation of premises known as 14 Second Avenue, Borough of Manhattan, City of New York, and for counsel fees consequent on the occupation of the premises by the defendants during the period September 1, 1960 to June 30, 1961. There was never a landlord and tenant relation between the parties; therefore, no basis for a recovery predicated on use and occupation is present. *(Castle*v. *Armstead,*168 App. Div. 466, affd. 219 N. Y. 615; see, also, 49 A. L. R. 2d 1169.) Defendants, however, concede plaintiff is entitled to damages for the period February 8, 1961 to June 30, 1961 during which defendants were in possession by force of the stay granted by the Appellate Term. Plaintiff is not entitled to counsel fees as an item of damage. (Cf. *de Raismes*v. *Thomas,*260 N. Y. 272.) In the circumstances the complaint is amended to conform to the proof and to the concession. Judgment is granted accordingly. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, McNally and Bergan, JJ.
### §2345. Export control programs

#### (a) Authority to pursue options for strengthening export control programs

The Secretary of Energy, in coordination with the Secretary of State, may pursue in the region of the former Soviet Union and other regions of concern options for accelerating programs that assist the countries in such regions in improving their domestic export control programs for materials, technologies, and expertise relevant to the construction or use of a nuclear or radiological dispersal device.

#### (b) Amount for activities

Of the amount authorized to be appropriated by section 3101(a)(2) 1 for the Department of Energy for the National Nuclear Security Administration for defense nuclear nonproliferation, up to $5,000,000 may be available for carrying out this section.

(Pub. L. 107–314, div. C, title XXXI, §3159, Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2741.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 3101(a)(2), referred to in subsec. (b), is section 3101(a)(2) of Pub. L. 107–314, div. C, title XXXI, Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2729, which is not classified to the Code.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003, and not as part of the Defense Against Weapons of Mass Destruction Act of 1996 which comprises this chapter.

1 See References in Text note below.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dionics, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



Dated: November 12, 2003      By:    /s/ Bernard Kravitz
                                     Bernard Kravitz,
                                     President and Chief Executive
                                     Officer
                                     (Principal Executive Officer)


Dated: November 12, 2003      By:    /s/ Bernard Kravitz
                                     Bernard Kravitz,
                                     Principal Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-17642, Form S-8 No. 33-45131, Form S-8 No. 33-45132, Form S-8
No. 33-62863, Form S-8 No. 33-64860, Form S-8 No. 33-72494, Form S-8 No.
33-77586, Form S-8 No. 33-77590, Form S-8 No. 333-74873, Form S-8 No. 333-68103,
Form S-8 No. 333-61089, Form S-8 No. 333-28009, Form S-4 No. 333-79839, Form S-3
No. 33-85898, Form S-8 No. 333-89127, Form S-3 No. 333-90560 and Form S-8 No.
333-101328) of Intervoice, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated May 5,
2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Intervoice, Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended February 28, 2003.


                                                 ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Dallas, Texas
May 27, 2003
#### § 910.800 General requirements for bonding of surface coal mining and reclamation operations.

Part 800 of this chapter, *General Requirements for Bonding of Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Operations Under Regulatory Programs,* shall apply to all surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-08-31T11:25:16-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
Editorial Note on Part 817
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54999, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 817 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93418, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 817.107 Backfilling and grading: Steep slopes. ( a ) Underground mining activities on steep slopes shall be conducted so as to meet the requirements of §§ 817.102-817.106 and the requirements of this section.
( b ) The following materials shall not be placed on the downslope: ( 1 ) Spoil.
( 2 ) Waste materials of any type.
( 3 ) Debris, including that from clearing and grubbing.
( 4 ) Abandoned or disabled equipment.
( c ) Land above the highwall shall not be disturbed unless the regulatory authority finds that this disturbance will facilitate compliance with the environmental protection standards of this subchapter and the disturbance is limited to that necessary to facilitate compliance.
( d ) Woody materials shall not be buried in the backfilled area unless the regulatory authority determines that the proposed method for placing woody material within the backfill will not deteriorate the stable condition of the backfilled area.
[48 FR 23370, May 24, 1983, as amended at 48 FR 41735, Sept. 16, 1983; 81 FR 93418, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54999, Nov. 17, 2017]
METAL/NONMETAL

Serious Accident

Crushed & Broken Stone mine - Miner entered the impact crusher to remove a 

blockage. Rocks fell from the feeder above and engulfed him up to his knees. 

Afterward, two miners entered the crusher and freed him. 

Best Practices

• Establish and follow safe job procedures that mitigate hazards when unplugging 

discharge chutes.

• Evaluate a task before performing work.

• Position yourself in a safe location where you are not exposed to hazards.

• Never enter a location where unexpected or unanticipated sliding material could 

entrap you.

• Close supply and discharge points and wear a safety harness and lanyard, which 

is securely anchored, prior to entering bins, hoppers, tanks, or silos.

• Use Lock - Tag - Try whenever: Placing any part of one’s body where it could be 

injured by moving machinery parts or release of stored energy (hydraulic or 

pneumatic pressure, steam, springs, objects that could fall or pivot).