alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Characteristics of Company Unions, 1935

              																	Davis, Eleanor					,	Saposs, David J., 1886-1968					,	Spielmans, John V.					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Characteristics of Company Unions, 1935 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 634*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. G.P.O., 										June 1937,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4148,			accessed on September 12, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 19
- 00521
- CV

Carmen Lizarraga d/b/a Carmen & Co., Appellant

v. C. Sue Sharpe as Trustee of the Robert Dale Tindle Jr. Special Needs Trust, Appellee

FROM THE 419TH DISTR ICT COURT OF TRAVIS C OU NTY NO. D
- 1
- GN
- 18
- 000909 , THE HONORABLE TIM SULAK, JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
The clerk’s record in this appeal was due for filing in this Court on September 16,
2019

. On September 17, 2019 , we noti fi ed ap pellant that no clerk’s record had been filed due to
her failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the trial

- court clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record. The notice requested that appellant make arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit

a sta t us report regarding this appeal by September 27, 2019 . Further, the notice advised appellant
that her failure to comply with this request could result in the dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. To date, app ellant has not filed a status repo r t or otherwise responded to this Court’s notice, and the clerk’s record has not been filed.

If a trial

- court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to an appellant’s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay for th e clerk’s fee for prep aring the re c ord, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed2

without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). In this case, appellant has not established
that she is entitled to proce ed without p ay ment of costs. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145 . Because appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecut ion.

____________ ______________________________ Chari L. Kelly , Justice
Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly
Dismissed for Want of Prosecution
Filed: October 31, 2019
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-12-07T08:40:46-0500
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### Joseph Viscusi et al., Respondents, v. Armando S. Canestrano et al., Appellants.

Appeal by defendants from a judgment of the Supreme Court which enjoined them from interfering with the use of a driveway by plaintiffs. The driveway extends from the street to plaintiffs’ garage and consists of two concrete strips "with grass between the strips. It is undisputed that part of the easterly strip encroaches upon defendants’ land. Plaintiffs claim a prescriptive easement by continuous use for more than 15 years. Plaintiffs purchased their premises in June, 1940, and installed the concrete strips in 1943. Defendants purchased their vacant lot in October, 1953, completed a house thereon in June, 1954, and completed a fence along the center of the easterly concrete strip in April, 1955. There is inadequate room between plaintiffs’ house and the fence to permit ingress and egress for a car to plaintiffs’ garage. Defendants contend principally that plaintiffs’ possession or use did not cover 15 years prior to the time the fence was built, and that plaintiffs’ use was not under claim of right. There is proof that plaintiffs’ predecessor in title used the area for several years to drive and park cars thereon; that there were visible tracks made by such vehicles, and that plaintiffs used the area in question and drove automobiles over it prior to the construction of the concrete strips. Such testimony covers a period of well over 15 years. The court below has found that “the plaintiffs and their predecessors in title used the driveway adversely, openly and notoriously, continuously and uninterrupted for the requisite prescription period to give rise to an easement or right of use of the same.” The evidence in the record amply supports such a finding, and under such circumstances an *839adverse holding under claim of right may be presumed. *(Firman*v. *Confer,*273 N. Y. 357; *Di Leo*v. *Fecksto Holding Corp.,*304 N. Y. 505.) Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondents. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
### §3504. Repealed. Pub. L. 85–507, §21(b)(2), July 7, 1958, 72 Stat. 337

Section, act June 20, 1949, ch. 227, §4, 63 Stat. 208, related to education and training of officers and employees. See section 4101 et seq. of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 403d of this title and repealed prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
### §60302. General responsibilities

The Administrator shall—

(1) develop a sustained relationship with the United States commercial remote sensing industry and, consistent with applicable policies and law, to the maximum practicable, rely on their services; and

(2) in conjunction with United States industry and universities, research, develop, and demonstrate prototype Earth science applications to enhance Federal, State, local, and tribal governments' use of government and commercial remote sensing data, technologies, and other sources of geospatial information for improved decision support to address their needs.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3423.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 60302 | 42 U.S.C. 16672. | Pub. L. 109–155, title III, §312, Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2920. |

Section
<PAGE>

Statement Pursuant to Section 1350(a) of title 18, United States Code


The undersigned, Peter R. Kann and Christopher W. Vieth, certify that:

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dow Jones & Company, Inc. (the
"Company") for the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-Q"),
which is being filed today with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934.

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                             /s/Peter R. Kann
                                             ------------------------
                                             Peter R. Kann
                                             Chief Executive Officer,
                                             Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
                                             Dated:  May 9, 2003


                                             /s/Christopher W. Vieth
                                             ------------------------
                                             Christopher W. Vieth
                                             Chief Financial Officer,
                                             Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
                                             Dated:  May 9, 2003

                                     Page 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.1101-20 Safeguards for dry powder chemical systems.

Adequate guards shall be provided along all belt conveyors in the vicinity of each dry powder chemical system to protect persons whose vision is restricted by a discharge of powder from the system. In addition, hand-rails shall be installed in such areas to provide assistance to those passing along the conveyor after a powder discharge.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS LISTED ON PAGES 2 AND 3 OF THIS FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001060513
<NAME> PARAGON CORPORATE HOLDINGS INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           6,937
<SECURITIES>                                    27,714
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,715
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     50,690
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               126,652
<PP&E>                                          12,372
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,615
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 175,750
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           57,832
<BONDS>                                        115,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,593)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   175,750
<SALES>                                        133,077
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               133,077
<CGS>                                           80,030
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   80,030
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   921
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,714
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     86
<INCOME-TAX>                                       440
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (354)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,280)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,634)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Note for the Docket:

Discussions with Tesoro, Intalco, Ecology and Northwest Clean Air Agency

Throughout 2012, EPA had a series of staff and management-level discussions and 

meetings with Tesoro, Intalco, Ecology and Northwest Clean Air Agency about the 

possible approach to BART we might take and later, about Tesoro and Intalco's 

proposals for alternatives to BART for their facilities. Through these exchanges, we 

also received written information from these entities, and these materials are included in 

the docket for this rulemaking.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000763978
<NAME> CBDP1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          23,679
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   58,194
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                81,873
<PP&E>                                       5,984,985
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,470,519
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,763,805
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          489,667
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,763,805
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               569,559
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               479,306
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             349,250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (258,997)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                        
<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                           1,000
       
<S>                                             <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1997  
<PERIOD-END>                                     DEC-31-1997  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         12-MOS
<CASH>                                                 2,000  
<SECURITIES>                                               0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                        434,000  
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0  
<INVENTORY>                                                0  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     464,000  
<PP&E>                                             5,395,000  
<DEPRECIATION>                                     1,485,000  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     4,374,000  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              9,823,000  
<BONDS>                                                    0  
<COMMON>                                             425,000  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 24,000  
<PREFERRED>                                           24,000  
<OTHER-SE>                                        18,132,000  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       4,374,000  
<SALES>                                                    0  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           0  
<CGS>                                                357,000  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        737,000  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   1,200,000  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 1,245,000  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    2,294,000  
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                2,294,000  
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0  
<CHANGES>                                                  0  
<NET-INCOME>                                       2,294,000  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              0  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0  
        




</TABLE>
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he H on orabl e N ancyD . F re ud enthal , C hi ef Judg e of the U ni t ed ** S ta te s D is tr ic t C o u rt f

o rth e D is tr ic t o f

W y o m in g , s ittin g b yd e s ig n a tio n . T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on * ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. AR MAND O P OR R AS - C OR DE R O, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 11- 10445 D . C. N o . 4 : 1 1 - c r - 0 1 1 0 2 - RCC ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona N anc yD . F r e ude ntha l , C hi e f Judge , P r e s i di ng ** S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r10, 2012 *** B e f o r e : W A R D L A W , C L I F T O N , an dN .R . S M I T H , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . A rm ando P orr a s - C or de r o appe a l s f r om hi s gui l ty - pl e ac onvi c t i on and 6 4 - m o n th s e n te n c e f

o rr e e n trya f

te rd e p o rta tio n , in v io la tio n o f 8 U .S .C . § 1 3 2 6 . 

# FI LED SEP 20 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 10445 2 P ur s uantt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 38 6 U . S . 73 8 (19 67 ), P orra s- C ordero’ s c ou nsel h a s f ile dab r ie f

s ta tin g th e r e a r e n o g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f , a lo n g w ith am o tio n to w ith d r aw a s c o u n s e l o f

r e c o r d . W e h a v e p r o v id e dP o rr a s - C o r d e r o th e o p p o rtu n ity t o fi l e apro se s up pl em ent albri ef . N o p ro se supp l em ent albri ef or answ er i ng bri ef ha s be e n f

i l e d. O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s uantt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 4 8 8 U . S. 7 5 , 8 0 ( 1 9 8 8 ) , d is c lo s e s n o a r g u ab le g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f o n d ir e c t ap p e a l. W e d is m is s in lig h t o f

th e v a lidap p e a l w a iv e r . See U ni ted States v. N

gu ye n , 235 F . 3d 11 79 , 11 82 (9th C i r. 20 00 ). C o u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED . D I SM I SSED .
### §103502. Signature projects and programs

(a) List.—The Secretary shall—

(1) develop a list of signature projects and programs eligible for funding from the National Park Centennial Challenge Fund;

(2) submit the list developed pursuant to paragraph (1) to the Committees on Appropriations and Energy and Natural Resources in the United States Senate, and to the Committees on Appropriations and Natural Resources in the House of Representatives; and

(3) prioritize deferred maintenance projects, physical improvements to visitor services facilities and trail maintenance.

(b) Updates.—The Secretary may, from time to time, as the Secretary finds appropriate, add any signature project or program to the list and provide notice of such addition as required by subsection (a).

(Added Pub. L. 114–289, title I, §101(a), Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1484.)
#### REILLY v. FREEMAN et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 23, 1903.)

Action by John Reilly, as assignee, against Charles Q. Freeman and others.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs.
**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION** Exhibit 31-17I, Anthony F. Earley, Jr., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 of TheDetroit Edison Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. (Intentionally omitted)  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   /s/ ANTHONY F. EARLEY, JR. Date: August 4, 2005   Anthony F. Earley, Jr.  Chairman, President, Chief Executive and