alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023344EN.01012001.xml

| 29.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/120 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/120

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11103 – PUBLIC POWER CORPORATION / ENEL ROMANIA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 344/09)

On 22 June 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain.It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11103. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11103. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       6,972,592
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,346,944
<ALLOWANCES>                                   293,697
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,418,841
<PP&E>                                       7,998,592
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,649,567
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              62,449,684
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,835,160
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    37,577,206
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,183,765
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                62,449,684
<SALES>                                     39,238,809
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            39,238,809
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            33,741,041
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                76,182
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             259,871
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,161,715
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,138,242
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,023,473
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,023,473
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of William E. Bennett, Jr., an Attorney, Respondent. Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Petitioner.

First Department,

March 29, 1962.

*130
      *Eric Nightingale*of counsel *(Raymond P. Whearty*with him on the brief), for petitioner.

*William E. Bennett, Jr.,*respondent in person.

*Per Curiam.*

A Referee has found that respondent had deposited escrow funds in his personal account and commingled such moneys with his own. Those funds were thereafter levied upon in connection with a judgment obtained against respondent. The client was ultimately reimbursed after complaint was made to the Bar Association. Moreover, it has been found that respondent issued approximately 160 checks over a period of 18 months, from a number of bank accounts, which were returned because of insufficient funds. We have condemned such practice as unprofessional conduct. *(Matter of Healy,*11 A D 2d 4; *Matter of Portnick,*5 A D 2d 16; *Matter of Schner,*5 A D 2d 599.) In addition, respondent has been found guilty of neglecting clients’ causes and either ignoring requests for information about such causes or misrepresenting their status to his clients. Finally, respondent failed to comply with the Special Rules Regulating the Conduct of Attorneys in that he failed to file statements of retainer. Characteristically, even in this disciplinary proceeding, respondent has manifested an unprofessional laxity by failing to file answers to the petition and supplemental petitions; and he did not submit any papers in opposition to the motion to confirm the Referee’s report. Such inaction may be construed as ‘1 indifference to the consequences of an adverse determination ” *(Matter of Schner, supra,*p. 600).

The record amply sustains the findings of the Referee. Respondent’s conduct has demonstrated that he should no longer be permitted to remain a member of an honorable profession. Under the circumstances, the respondent should be disbarred.

Rabin, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE LIFECORE
BIOMEDICAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000028626
<NAME> LIFECORE BIOMEDICAL
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,948,000
<SECURITIES>                                 7,928,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,656,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   328,000
<INVENTORY>                                 13,801,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,550,000
<PP&E>                                      34,768,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,690,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              65,157,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,884,000
<BONDS>                                      7,509,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       123,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  52,641,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                65,157,000
<SALES>                                     18,984,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,984,000
<CGS>                                        8,570,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,920,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             101,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (281,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (281,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (281,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         900,871
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  251,819
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    141,539
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,435,419
<PP&E>                                       3,568,988
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,237,115
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,746,013
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,563,113
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        3,861,000
<PREFERRED>                                     80,000
<COMMON>                                       200,957
<OTHER-SE>                                  (4,853,500)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,746,013
<SALES>                                      6,150,191
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,150,191
<CGS>                                        3,894,896
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,767,161
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                95,788
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              75,628
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                161,624
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            161,624
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   149,124
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
§ 735.12 Eligibility for administration and enforcement grants. ( a ) *Approved program required.* In order to receive a grant to administer and enforce a State program, the State must have an approved State regulatory program.
( b ) *Designation of a State agency.* In order to receive a grant to administer and enforce a State program, the Governor must designate a single agency to receive and administer administration and enforcement grants, including cooperative agreement grants described in § 735.16 of this part.
( c ) *Nondiscrimination.* The agency shall monitor the compliance activity of its subrecipients with respect to the nondiscrimination provisions in § 735.21(a)(4) of this part.
#### PEOPLE ex rel. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO. v. MILLER, State Comptroller.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third "Department.

December 1, 1903.)

Proceeding by the people, upon the relation of the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company, against Nathan L. Miller, as comptroller of the state of New York.

No opinion. Determination of the comptroller affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements.
**Exhibit 10.1**

The Company leases its headquarters space under that certain Lease Agreement dated as of January 1, 2006, by and between CROWN Cork & Seal USA, Inc., as Lessor, and Constar, Inc., as Lessee (the “Lease”). TheLease was filed as Exhibit 10.1 to a Report on Form 8-K filed on April 6, 2006. The Lease has been amended by oral agreement to increase the amount of rented space. The monthly rent for the additional space is $2,223. This is inaddition to the $1,872 increase reported in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006.
### Conference Call with Tribal Environmental Professionals

April 2 1, 2010

Meeting Note to the Docket

Discussion Topics

On April 21 , 2010 , representatives from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

participated in a meeting to update intereste d members from the National Tribal Air

Association (NTAA) o n the status of the rule titled: “Review of New Sources and

Modifications in Indian Country.” The attendees discussed the:

• Proposed schedule for finalizing the rule
### §441j–4. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 441j–4, comprising section 1015 of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as section 3205 of this title.
§ 576.303 Territories. ( a ) *General.* Grant funds returned by a territory will be reallocated to other territories, then if funds remain, to States.
( b ) *Allocation method.* The funds will be allocated as follows: ( 1 ) For territories, the funds will be allocated among the territories in direct proportion with each territory's share of the total population of all of the eligible territories. If HUD determines that a territory failed to spend its funds in accordance with ESG requirements, then HUD may exclude the territory from the allocation of reallocation amounts under this section.
( 2 ) For States, the funds will be allocated to each State in direct proportion with each State's share of the total amount of funds allocated to States under § 576.3.
( c ) *Notification of availability.* HUD will notify eligible recipients of the availability of the fund by a letter or Federal Register notice, which will specify how the awards of funds will be made.
( d ) *Application requirements.* Within 45 days after the date of notification, the eligible recipient must submit to HUD a substantial amendment to its consolidated plan in accordance with 24 CFR part 91.
( e ) *Restrictions that apply to reallocated amounts.* The same requirements that apply to grant funds allocated under § 576.3 apply to grant funds reallocated under this section.
#### SIMONS v. ZOBEL.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 10, 1905.)

Action by Edward Simons against Frederick C. Zobel. No opinion. Motion granted, so far as to dismiss appeal, with $10 costs.
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.503 Permissible electric face equipment; maintenance.

[Statutory Provisions]

The operator of each coal mine shall maintain in permissible condition all electric face equipment required by §§ 75.500, 75.501, 75.504 to be permissible which is taken into or used inby the last open crosscut of any such mine.
#### In the Matter of James Madison Houses. City of New York, Appellant-Respondent; First Elephant Estates, Inc., et al., Respondents; La Hermosa Church et al., Respondents-Appellants.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before September 11, 1962, with notice of argument for the October 1962 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1164 What are the requirements for flaring or venting gas containing H2S? ( a ) You may not vent gas containing H2S, except for minor releases during maintenance and repair activities that do not result in a 15-minute time-weighted average atmosphere concentration of H2S of 20 ppm or higher anywhere on the platform.
( b ) You may flare gas containing H2S only if you meet the requirements of §§ 250.1160, 250.1161, 250.1163, and the following additional requirements: ( 1 ) For safety or air pollution prevention purposes, the Regional Supervisor may further restrict the flaring of gas containing H2S. The Regional Supervisor will use information provided in the lessee's H2S Contingency Plan (§ 250.490(f)), Exploration Plan, DPP, DOCD submitted to BOEM, and associated documents to determine the need for restrictions; and
( 2 ) If the Regional Supervisor determines that flaring at a facility or group of facilities may significantly affect the air quality of an onshore area, the Regional Supervisor may require you to conduct an air quality modeling analysis, under 30 CFR 550.303, to determine the potential effect of facility emissions. The Regional Supervisor may require monitoring and reporting, or may restrict or prohibit flaring, under 30 CFR 550.303 and 30 CFR 550.304.
( c ) The Regional Supervisor may require you to submit monthly reports of flared and vented gas containing H2S. Each report must contain, on a daily basis: ( 1 ) The volume and duration of each flaring and venting occurrence;
( 2 ) H2S concentration in the flared or vented gas; and
( 3 ) The calculated amount of SO2 emitted.
#### PLUM’S ESTATE v. MANN et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

January 4, 1905.)

In the matter of estate of Anna L. Plum against Francis N. Mann and another, as executors, and Otto Kelsey, as comptroller. No opinion. Motion denied.
#### Benjamin Bronen et al., Respondents, v. New York Abstract Company, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Order, entered January 3, 1963, denying defendants’ motion and plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously modified on the law, to the extent of granting defendants’ said motion, with $10 costs, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendants-appellants. The complaint alleges defendant New York Abstract Company Inc. (Abstract) certified and defendant Security Title & Guaranty Company (Security) insured good and marketable title and freedom from incumbrances of the premises herein. The deed was delivered March 13, 1958. The certificate of title of Abstract ivas issued January 15, 1958 and amended March 13, 1958. The title policy of Security is dated March 13, 1958. Security insures against *“*a claim of title or incumbrance, prior in date to this policy and thereby insured against ”. Prior to March 13, 1958 the building on the land was legal. The building became illegal by reason of the subdivision contemplated by the contract of sale and effected by the deed delivered on March 13, 1958. The certificate of Abstract accurately reflected the records of Municipal Departments as to the premises on the date thereof, January 15, 1958, and thereafter to March 13, 1958, the date of .delivery of the deed. The coverage of the policy of Security dated March *82213, JL958 does not include the zoning violation .effected' the same ■ day by the delivery of the deed. Moreover, the policy (par 10, subd. H) expressly excludes from coverage failure to comply with the zoning law. In addition, a condition precedent of the policy has not materialized, to wit: a final determination in a court of competent jurisdiction adverse to plaintiffs’ title upon a lien or incumbrance not excepted in the policy. *(Udell*v. *City Title Ins. Co.,*12 A D 2d 78.) Concur — Botein, P. J., McNally, 'Stevens, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9814 

To amend the Housing Act of 1949 to permit the assumption of loans 

under the Doug Bereuter Section 502 Single Family Housing Loan 

Guarantee Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 

Mr. COSTA (for himself, Mrs. CHAVEZ-DEREMER, and Mr. LAMALFA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Housing Act of 1949 to permit the assumption 

of loans under the Doug Bereuter Section 502 Single 

Family Housing Loan Guarantee Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Homeownership 

5 Continuity Act of 2024’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9814 IH

1 SEC. 2. ASSUMPTION OF LOANS UNDER THE DOUG BEREU2 TER SECTION 502 SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING 

3 LOAN GUARANTEE PROGRAM. 

4 Section 502(h)(10) of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 

5 U.S.C. 1472(h)(10)) is amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(10) RULEMAKING WITH RESPECT TO AS7 SUMPTION OF GUARANTEED LOANS.— 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall, 

9 not later than 1 year after the date of the en10 actment of this paragraph, issue a rule that es11 tablishes a process though which— 

12 ‘‘(i) a guaranteed loan, and the obli13 gations, rights, and interests associated 

14 with such loan, may be assumed by a 

15 qualified borrower to whom the current 

16 borrower transfers the property for which 

17 the guaranteed loan was made; and 

18 ‘‘(ii) the borrower who transfers the 

19 property for which the guaranteed loan 

20 was made, and any co-borrower or guar21 antor of such borrower, are relieved of li22 ability with respect to the guaranteed 

23 loan.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
SERVED OCTOBER 20, 2011 

JbPARTMENTOF 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIOMNSPORTATtON 

OFFICE OF FIEARINGS '-•GGi^tl OPERATIONS 

WASHINGTON, DC ^ , ^^^ ^^ ^ ,. I 2 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

DEAN INTERNATFONAL, INC., 

Respondent 

FAA Docket No. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Proceeding) 

FDMS No. FAA-2011-0069 

ORDER 

SETTING IVfOTION CONFERENCE 

The parties have filed muhiple Motions. Tlie Office of Hearings has contacted 

each party's attorney regarding his calendar availability to appear by telephone for a 

Motion Conference. 

It Is Hereby Ordered: 

1. The parties shall convene by telephone for a one-hour Motion Conference on 

Monday, October 24, 2011 at 2:30pni Eastern time. The Office of Hearings 

shall initiate the conference call. 

J.E. Sullivat 

U.S>AdiiHifistrative Law Judge 

Attachment: Service List 
^ 

FDMS No. FAA-2011-0069 

(Civil Penalty Proceeding) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Stuart A. Goldstein, Respondent's Counsel 

Law Offices of Goldstein & Sordo 

9350 South Dixie Highway, 10th Floor 

Miami, FL 33156 

TEL: 305-670-1222 

FAX: 305-670-7065 

Christopher R. Stevenson, Comp/ainani 's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel. ASO-7 

Southern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Bo.K 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

The Honorable J. E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation ^ . 

Office of Hearings, M-20, Room El 2-320 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. Por service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.