alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
69–008 

115TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 115–6 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE JOINT RESOLUTION (H.J. RES. 

38) DISAPPROVING THE RULE SUBMITTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF THE 

INTERIOR KNOWN AS THE STREAM PROTECTION RULE 

JANUARY 30, 2017.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. NEWHOUSE, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 70] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 70, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 38, disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior 

known as the Stream Protection Rule, under a closed rule. The resolution provides one hour of debate equally divided and controlled 

by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

Natural Resources. The resolution waives all points of order 

against consideration of the joint resolution. The resolution provides that the joint resolution shall be considered as read. The resolution waives all points of order against provisions in the joint resolution. The resolution provides one motion to recommit. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

Although the resolution waives all points of order against consideration of the joint resolution, the Committee is not aware of any 

points of order. The waiver is prophylactic in nature. 

Although the resolution waives all points of order against provisions in the joint resolution, the Committee is not aware of any 

points of order. The waiver is prophylactic in nature. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
# C_2023175EN.01000201.xml

| 17.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11083 – KBR / SUN CAPITAL / HOMESAFE JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 175/02)

On 11 May 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11083. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11083. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
### §40907. Museums

The Administrator may provide grants to, and enter into cooperative agreements with, museums and planetariums to enable them to enhance programs related to space exploration, aeronautics, space science, Earth science, or microgravity.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3394.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 40907 | 42 U.S.C. 16795. | Pub. L. 109–155, title VI, §616, Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2934. |

Section
§ 725.16 Grant agreement. ( a ) If a Director or his authorized designee approves an agency's grant application, the Director or his authorized designee shall prepare a grant agreement which includes— ( 1 ) The approved scope of the program to be covered by the grant, including functions to be accomplished by other agencies.
( 2 ) The base program budget and estimated costs in excess of the base program.
( 3 ) The amount of the grant.
( 4 ) Commencement and completion dates for the segment of the program covered by this grant and for major phases of the program to be completed during the grant period.
( 5 ) Permissible transfers of funds to other State agencies.
( b ) The Director or his authorized designee shall limit grants under this part to the additional costs to an agency for administering and enforcing the initial regulatory program.
( c ) The Director or his authorized designee may permit the agency to assign functions and funds to other State agencies. The Director or his authorized designee shall require the grantee agency to retain responsibility for overall administration of the grant, including use of funds, accomplishment of functions and reporting.
( d ) Except as may be provided by the grant agreement, costs may not be incurred prior to the execution of the agreement.
( e ) The Director or his authorized designee shall transmit four copies of the grant agreement, by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the agency for signature. The agency shall execute the grant agreement and return all copies within 3 calendar weeks after receipt, or within an extension of such time that may be granted by the Director or his authorized designee.
( f ) The Director or his authorized designee shall sign the grant agreement upon its return from the agency and return one copy to the agency. The grant is effective and constitutes an obligation of Federal funds in the amount and for the purposes stated in the grant agreement at the time the Director or his authorized designee signs the agreement.
( g ) Neither the approval of a program nor the award of any grant will commit or obligate the United States to award any continuation grant or to enter into any grant amendment, including grant increases to cover cost overruns.
Exhibit 24.1  POWER OF ATTORNEY   We, the undersigned directors of Questar Corporation, hereby severally constitute Ronald W. Jibson and Kevin W. Hadlock, and each of them acting alone, our true and lawful attorneys, with full power to them and each of them to sign for us and in our names in the capacities indicated below, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2010 and any and all amendments to be filed with the Securities and Exchange commission by Questar Corporation, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures as they may be signed by the attorneys appointed herein to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2010 and any and all amendments to such Report.  Witness our hands on the respective dates set forth below.  Signature Title Date    /s/ President and Chief Executive Officer 2/18/11 Ronald W. Jibson Director   /s/ Director 2/18/11 Teresa Beck   /s/ Director 2/18/11 R. D. Cash   /s/ Director 2/18/11 Laurence M. Downes   /s/ Director 2/18/11 Gary G. Michael   /s/ Director 2/18/11 Harris H. Simmons   /s/ Director 2/18/11 Bruce A. Williamson   BOARD\MEETINGS\11\FEB 17-18 BOARD\POA Q-1.DOCX
#### Fibertex Fabrics, Inc., Appellant, v. Clay Sickles et al., Respondents.

In view of the stipulation that the testimony of the witness Frankel be considered the testimony of the corporate plaintiff, we deem the disputed document properly in evidence as an admission, especially in the absence of an objection specifically directed to its authentication. That being so, plaintiff’s argument here, insofar as addressed to the evidentiai-y basis of the charge, must fail; and the propriety of the charge is not otherwise challenged. Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.801 Grounding resistors.

[Statutory Provisions]

The grounding resistor, where required, shall be of the proper ohmic value to limit the voltage drop in the grounding circuit external to the resistor to not more than 100 volts under fault conditions. The grounding resistor shall be rated for maximum fault current continuously and insulated from ground for a voltage equal to the phase-to-phase voltage of the system.
§ 823.4 Responsibilities. ( a ) The U.S. Soil Conservation Service within each State shall establish specifications for prime farmland soil removal, storage, replacement, and reconstruction.
( b ) The regulatory authority within each State shall use the soil-reconstruction specifications of paragraph (a) of this section to carry out its responsibilities under § 785.17 and subchapter J of this chapter.
----

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November 8, 2012 |   /s/ Ronald A. Duncan |
|------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                   | Ronald A. Duncan            |
|                   | Chief Executive Officer     |
|                   | General Communication, Inc. |

----
#### § 846.1 Scope.

This part covers the assessment of individual civil penalties under section 518(f) of the Act.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of John L. Roehsler, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

-It seems clear that claimant was uncertain whether his respiratory condition, which greatly restricted his physical activities but not, necessarily, some self-employment in work upon promotional ideas and programs, was of such a nature as to disqualify him from unemployment insurance benefits (Labor Law, § 527, subd. 1, par. [a] ; § 591, subd. 2) and whether, if it was, it was so serious as to entitle him to disability benefits from the Federal Social Security Administration (see IT. S. Code, tit. 42, § 423). In this quandary, claimant made application to both agencies and it is undisputed that he did so without concealment or intent to defraud. Indeed, claimant requested the Social Security Administration to make available to the Industrial Commissioner the medical data compiled in his case, but this the Administration refused to do. In this case, claimant’s application to the Social Security Administration might properly have been treated as evidence supportive of a factual determination of disability and consequent disqualification; but we are unable to determine whether the board gave the application that effect or whether the decision is to be construed as embodying the legally erroneous holding that the mere filing of the application established disability and consequent disqualification from unemployment insurance benefits as a matter of law (cf. *Matter of San Filippo*v. *San Filippo,*17 A D 2d 1019, mot. for iv. to opp. den. 12 N Y 2d 645; *Neel*v. *Bibieoff,*204 F. Supp. 914; *Johnson*v. *Flemming,*188 F. Supp. 447; *Thompson*v. *Flemming,*188 F. Supp. 123). Remittal being necessary in any event, claimant should have a further opportunity to present medical evidence; particularly so because, in the course of a colloquy on that subject, he was not informed that the legal burden to do so was upon him. Decision reversed and ease remitted, with costs to appellant. Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 816
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54979, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 816 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93392, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 816.95 Stabilization of surface areas. ( a ) All exposed surface areas shall be protected and stabilized to effectively control erosion and air pollution attendant to erosion.
( b ) Rills and gullies, which form in areas that have been regraded and topsoiled and which either ( 1 ) disrupt the approved postmining land use or the reestablishment of the vegetative cover, or
( 2 ) cause or contribute to a violation of water quality standards for receiving streams shall be filled, regraded, or otherwise stabilized; topsoil shall be replaced; and the areas shall be reseeded or replanted.
[48 FR 1163, Jan. 10, 1983, as amended at 81 FR 93392, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54979, Nov. 17, 2017]
p. 1



# OAR Box 

# 1413 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 62 ) 11-1-6 2
Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/9/2008 3:11:23 PM

Sheet 62 of 114

# V P. 2



# Stat e o f Nort h Carolin a Departmen t o f Environment , Healt h an d Natura l Resource s Raleig h Regiona l Offic e Jame s B

. Hunt , Jr. , Governo r Jonatha n B

. Howes , Secretar y
DIVISIO N OF AI RQUALIT Y „ .

Febraaiy 11 , 199 7 

## A 945 ?



# Ihl-GZ

Mr . Ti m Ohle r Environmental/Safet

y Coordinato r Kidron , Inc . 1344 2 Emerso n Rd. , Bo x 1 7 Kidron , Ohi o 4463 6 SUBJECT : Inactivatio n o f Ai rPenni tNo . 2632R 5 Hackne y Brothers , Inc . Wilson , NC , Wilso n County , 5/98-0004 8 Dea rMr. Ohler : Thi s lette ri s writte n i n response t o you rletterdate d Januar y 28 , 1997 , i n whic

h yo u reques tinactivatio n o f th e abov e reference d Permi tTh e lette rstate d tha tthe facility woul d b e ceasin g all operations a s o f Januar y 31 , 1997 . Pe r you rtelephon e conversatio n wit h Stacey Julien o f thi s offic e o n Februar

y 11 , 1997 , th e facility ha s cease d al l operations . Wit h thi s letter , th e penni ti s hereb y inactivated . Pleas e b e advise d tha

tprio rt o constructio n o f equipmen twit

h th e potential t

o emi tai rpollutants and/o r enterin g int

o a n irrevocabl e contractfo rth e constructio n an d installatio n ofan y aircleanin g device , a n applicatio n mus tb e submitte d and a ne w Penni treceived . Pleas e b e awar e thatrecen tchange s t o Ai rQualit y regulations no w requir e th e permittin g o f

certai n existin g boiler s an d emergenc y generators whic h wer e previousl y exempt . Als o ther e ma y b e othe rfederal , state , o rloca l regulation s t o whic h you rfacility i s subjec t If yo u hav e an y question s pleas e fee l free t o contac tMr . Charles McEachem orMs . Stace y Julien , Environmenta

l Engineer s at919/57 1 -4700 . Sincerely ,



# £^A6^ — EraieTille r Ai rQualit

y Regiona l Superviso r AQEI Coordinato r Laur a Butler , Ai rPennit s Branc h Centra l File s RR O File s C O C O S3 

### r n o o > S3 

### m o o 3 3 O c/ > 3 a 2

380 0 Barret t Drive

. Suit e 101 , Raleigh

. Nort h Carolin a 2760 9 Voic e 919-571-470 0 FA X 919-571-471 8 A n Equa l Opportunity Affirmativ e Actio n Employe r 50 % recycled/10 % post-consume rpape r
### §20101. Short title

This chapter may be cited as the "National Aeronautics and Space Act".

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3330.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20101 | (no source) | |

Section

Chapter 201 of title 51 restates the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958. Although short titles are generally eliminated as unnecessary in positive law titles of the United States Code, in this case it was suggested that the short title "National Aeronautics and Space Act" be provided for convenience.
#### § 77.1104 Accumulations of combustible materials.

Combustible materials, grease, lubricants, paints, or flammable liquids shall not be allowed to accumulate where they can create a fire hazard.
§ 77.1904 Communications between slope and shaft bottoms and hoist operators. ( a ) Two independent means of signaling shall be provided between the hoistman and all points in a slope or shaft where men are required to work. At least one of these means shall be audible to the hoistman. Signal codes used in any communication system shall be posted conspicuously at each slope and shaft.
( b ) Signaling systems used for communication between slopes and shafts and the hoistman shall be tested daily.
Page 1 of 1

Meeting Summary: Triclosan Surface Water Modeling and Monitoring 

January 18, 2012, 9:00 AM to 10:00 AM 

Room S-8671, 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22202 

Participants

Microban International, Ltd.: Matt Richter, Neil K. Snyder* 

The Accord Group: Pat Quinn 

Environ: Ranjit Machado, Michael Beyer* 

Toxrac: Martin Bernstein 

EPA: Nader Elkassabany, Donna Randall, Najm Shamim, Zoe Layton, Jim Breithaupt, 

Mark Hartman, Lance Wormell, Rebecca von dem Hagen 

*participated via conference call 

Summary

On Wednesday, January 18, 2012 the Antimicrobials Division hosted a meeting with 

Microban International, Ltd., the technical registrant of triclosan, to discuss the analytical 

methods for the surface water monitoring study required by the post-RED Data Call-In 

(DCI) issued in October 2011. The Agency is asking the registrant to measure levels of 

triclosan and its degradates at the effluent of textile manufacturing facilities. The 

meeting focused on identifying an analytical method with the ability to measure for 

triclosan and its degradates at the lowest possible detection levels. It was determined that 

Microban will only be responsible for monitoring triclosan and methyl triclosan due to 

other sources of 2,4-dichlorophenol being present in the textile manufacturing process. 

AD and the registrant also discussed other aspects of the DCI including waiver requests 

and triggers for both the required and conditionally required data requirements. 

Next Steps

The Agency agreed to recommend an analytical method for Microban to utilize for the 

water monitoring study in the very near future. The registrant intends to sample textile 

facilities by the end of February. Also, Microban and the Agency will continue to have 

discussions about the DCI.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
<LEGEND>
THE  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) OF DOUGHTIE'S FOODS, INC. FOR THE
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 26, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-26-1999
<CASH>                                                  16
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        8,032
<ALLOWANCES>                                           469
<INVENTORY>                                          4,398
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    12,443
<PP&E>                                               6,364
<DEPRECIATION>                                       3,882
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      15,034
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                4,530
<BONDS>                                                417
<COMMON>                                             1,495
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                           8,593
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        15,034
<SALES>                                             41,146
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    41,146
<CGS>                                               34,383
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       40,534
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      18
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        594
<INCOME-TAX>                                           315
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    279
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           279
<EPS-BASIC>                                          .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .19


</TABLE>
#### § 57.19110 Overhead protection for shaft deepening work.

A substantial bulkhead or equivalent protection shall be provided above persons at work deepening a shaft.
### §13501. General jurisdiction

The Secretary and the Board have jurisdiction, as specified in this part, over transportation by motor carrier and the procurement of that transportation, to the extent that passengers, property, or both, are transported by motor carrier—

(1) between a place in—

(A) a State and a place in another State;

(B) a State and another place in the same State through another State;

(C) the United States and a place in a territory or possession of the United States to the extent the transportation is in the United States;

(D) the United States and another place in the United States through a foreign country to the extent the transportation is in the United States; or

(E) the United States and a place in a foreign country to the extent the transportation is in the United States; and

(2) in a reservation under the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States or on a public highway.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §103, Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 859.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 10521 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.