alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 865.13 Investigation and conference procedures. ( a ) Within 7 days after receipt of any application for review, the Office shall mail a copy of the application for review to the person alleged to have caused the discrimination, shall file the application for review with the Office of Hearings and Appeals and shall notify the employee and the alleged discriminating person that the Office will investigate the complaint. The alleged discriminating person may file a response to the application for review within 10 days after he receives the copy of the application for review. The response shall specifically admit, deny or explain each of the facts alleged in the application unless the alleged discriminating person is without knowledge in which case he shall so state.
( b ) The Office shall initiate an investigation of the alleged discrimination with 30 days after receipt of the application for review. The Office shall complete the investigation with 60 days of the date of the receipt of the application for review. If circumstances surrounding the investigation prevent completion within the 60-day period, the Office shall notify the person who filed the application for review and the alleged discriminating person of the delay, the reason for the delay, and the expected completion date for the investigation.
( c ) Within 7 days after completion of the investigation the Office shall invite the parties to an informal conference to discuss the findings and preliminary conclusions of the investigation. The purpose of the informal conference is to attempt to conciliate the matter. If a complaint is resolved at an informal conference, the terms of the agreement will be recorded in a written document that will be signed by the alleged discriminating person, the employee and the representative of the Office. If the Office concludes on the basis of a subsequent investigation that any party to the agreement has failed in any material respect to comply with the terms of any agreement reached during an informal conference, the Office shall take appropriate action to obtain compliance with the agreement.
( d ) Following the investigation and any informal conference held, the Office shall complete a report of investigation which shall include a summary of the results of the conference. Copies of this report shall be available to the parties in the case.
§ 401.7 Programs of institutes. ( a ) Release of grant funds to participating institutes is conditioned on the ability of each receiving institute to plan, conduct, or otherwise arrange for: ( 1 ) Competent research, investigations, and experiments of either a basic or practical nature, or both, in relation to water resources;
( 2 ) Promotion of the dissemination and application of the results of these efforts; and
( 3 ) Assistance in the training of scientists in relevant fields of endeavor to water resources through the research, investigations, and experiments.
( b ) Such research, investigations, experiments and training may include: ( 1 ) Aspects of the hydrologic cycle;
( 2 ) Supply and demand;
( 3 ) Demineralization of saline and other impaired waters;
( 4 ) Conservation and best use of available supplies of water and methods of increasing such supplies;
( 5 ) Water reuse;
( 6 ) Depletion and degradation of ground-water supplies;
( 7 ) Improvements in the productivity of water when used for agricultural, municipal, and commercial purposes;
( 8 ) The economic, legal, engineering, social, recreational, biological, geographical, ecological, or other aspects of water problems;
( 9 ) Scientific information dissemination activities, including identifying, assembling, and interpreting the results of scientific research on water resources problems, and ;
( 10 ) Providing means for improved communication of research results, having due regard for the varying conditions and needs of the respective States and regions.
( c ) An institute shall cooperate closely with other colleges and universities in the State that have demonstrated capabilities for research, information dissemination and graduate training in the development of its program. For purposes of financial management, reporting and other research program management and administration activities, the institutes shall be responsible for performance of the activities of other participating institutions.
( d ) Each institute shall cooperate closely with other institutes and other research organizations in the region to increase the effectiveness of the institutes, to coordinate their activities, and to avoid undue duplication of effort.
Appeal No. 75-337.

#### In re Adoption of Leonard and Gina.

These petitions seeking the adoption of minor children without the consent of their father were filed in the fall of 1973 in the Family Court. The petitioners are the children’s mother and her present husband. Early in April 1973 a final decree *913was entered in the Family Court awarding the mother a divorce on the ground of extreme .cruelty but specifically stating that the issues of the mother’s alimony and the children’s support were to be left open. The divorce records indicate that service of the divorce papers on the father had been made by publication.

*Benedetto A. Cerilli, Sr.,*for petitioners.

*Anthony G. Iannuccillo,*for respondent.

The father appeared at the adoption hearings and refused to give his consent to the pending petitions. The trial justice in a five-page rescript ruled that pursuant to the terms of G.L. 1956 (1969 Reenactment) §15-7-7 the father had lost his right to withhold -consent because he had failed to provide proper -care and maintenance for the' children for more than a year preceding the filing of the adoption petitions.

Our examination of the Family Court records indicates that at no time have decrees been entered in the proceedings under review which either grant or -deny the adoption petitions. At this moment the -only definitive ruling in the record is the court’s decision on the consent issue. Briefs presented by both sides indicate that the litigants apparently assume that the adoption petitions were granted, but the records point to the contrary. Accordingly, any further action on our part as to the necessity -of obtaining the .father’s consent would be purely interlocutory.

In order to expedite the final determination of this controversy, we shall retain jurisdiction over the appeal but remand the -records before us to the Family Court for the entry of nunc pro -tunc decrees which should contain findings as to the father’s failure to support as well as action on the prayers seeking the court’s approval of the pending petitions. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that the records now before us be remanded to the Family Court for the entry of the necessary decrees. Once the decrees -are entered, the records will be remitted forthwith to this court.
#### § 585.619 [Reserved]
#### § 778.22 Facilities or structures used in common.

The plans of a facility or structure that is to be shared by two or more separately permitted mining operations may be included in one permit application and referenced in the other applications. In accordance with part 800 of this chapter, each permittee shall bond the facility or structure unless the permittees sharing it agree to another arrangement for assuming their respective responsibilities. If such agreement is reached, then the application shall include a copy of the agreement between or among the parties setting forth the respective bonding responsibilities of each party for the facility or structure. The agreement shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the regulatory authority that all responsibilities under this chapter for the facility or structure will be met.
# Patent

## Title
Azolyl cycloalkanol derivatives and agricultural fungicides

## Abstract

Further reduction yields the dianion 6.sup.2-, which has an orange colour (absorption maximum at 493 nm, curve 7 in FIG. 2B). The conditions of the reduction are as follows: acetonitrile, 0,1 n tetrabutyl ammonium hexafluorophosphate reduction to 6.sup..-  at -1000 mV vs. ferrocene, reduction to 6.sup.2-  at -1500 mV vs. ferrocene.

## Background
## Claims

1. A dicyanovinylsubstituted furan compound of the formula ##STR18## wherein A.sub.1 is CH.sub.2 OR.sup.1, and wherein R.sup.1 is H or a C.sub.1 -C.sub.8 alkyl, phenyl, p-hydroxyphenyl, p-nitrophenyl, p-dimethylamino phenyl, naphthyl, 2-pyridyl, trimethylsilyl, triphenylsilyl, acetyl, palmitoyl, benzoyl, p-nitrobenzoyl, methanesulfonyl, p-toluenesulfonyl, phosphonyl, 2-methoxyethyl or 4-methoxybutyl group.
#### § 778.9 Certifying and updating existing permit application information.

In this section, “you” means the applicant and “we” or “us” means the regulatory authority.

(a) If you have previously applied for a permit and the required information is already in AVS, then you may update the information as shown in the following table.

| If . . . | then you . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (1) All or part of the information already in AVS is accurate and complete | may certify to us by swearing or affirming, under oath and in writing, that the relevant information in AVS is accurate, complete, and up to date. |
| (2) Part of the information in AVS is missing or incorrect | must submit to us the necessary information or corrections and swear or affirm, under oath and in writing, that the information you submit is accurate and complete. |
| (3) You can neither certify that the data in AVS is accurate and complete nor make needed corrections | must include in your permit application the information required under this part. |

(b) You must swear or affirm, under oath and in writing, that all information you provide in an application is accurate and complete.

(c) We may establish a central file to house your identity information, rather than place duplicate information in each of your permit application files. We will make the information available to the public upon request.

(d) After we approve an application, but before we issue a permit, you must update, correct, or indicate that no change has occurred in the information previously submitted under this section and §§ 778.11 through 778.14 of this part.

[65 FR 79668, Dec. 19, 2000]
§ 7.307 Static pressure test. ( a ) *Test procedure.* ( 1 ) The enclosure shall be internally pressurized to a minimum of 150 psig and the pressure maintained for a minimum of 10 seconds.
( 2 ) Following the pressure hold, the pressure shall be removed and the pressurizing agent removed from the enclosure.
( b ) *Acceptable performance.* ( 1 ) The enclosure during pressurization shall not exhibit— ( i ) Leakage through welds or casting; or
( ii ) Rupture of any part that affects the explosion-proof integrity of the enclosure.
( 2 ) The enclosure following removal of the pressurizing agent shall not exhibit— ( i ) Visible cracks in welds;
( ii ) Permanent deformation exceeding 0.040 inches per linear foot; or
( iii ) Clearances, in excess of those specified in this subpart, along accessible flame-arresting paths, following any necessary retightening of fastenings.
§ 842.16 Availability of records. ( a ) Copies of all records, reports, inspection materials, or information obtained by the Office under Title V of the Act, this chapter, a Federal program or Federal lands program, and a State program being enforced by the Office under section 504(b) or 521(b) of the Act and part 733 of this chapter or §§ 842.11 or 842.12 shall be made immediately available to the public in the area of mining until at least five years after expiration of the period during which the subject operation is active or is covered by any portion of a reclamation bond so that they are conveniently available to residents of that area, except— ( 1 ) As otherwise provided by Federal law; and
( 2 ) For information not required to be made available under § 772.15, § 773.6(d), or § 840.14(d) of this chapter.
( b ) The Office shall ensure compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by either: ( 1 ) Making copies of all such records, reports, inspection materials, and other information available for public inspection at a Federal, State or local government office in the county where the mining is occurring or is proposed to occur; or
( 2 ) At the Office's option and expense, providing copies of such information promptly by mail at the request of any resident of the area where the mining is occurring or is proposed to occur, provided that the Office shall maintain for public inspection at a Federal, State, or local government office in the county where the mining is occurring or is proposed to occur a description of the information available for mailing and the procedure for obtaining such information.
( c ) Copies of documents and information required to be made available under paragraph (a) of this section shall be provided to the State regulatory authority, if any.
(Pub. L. 95-87, 30 U.S.C. 1201 *et seq.*)
[47 FR 35635, Aug. 16, 1982, as amended at 48 FR 44781, Sept. 30, 1983; 65 FR 79670, Dec. 19, 2000]
#### § 77.1907 Hoist construction; general.

If hooks are used to attach cages or buckets to the socket or thimble of a hoisting rope, the hooks shall be self-closing.

(Sec. 101, Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, Pub. L. 91-173 as amended by Pub. L. 95-164, 91 Stat. 1291 (30 U.S.C. 811))

[48 FR 53242, Nov. 25, 1983]
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.1716-1 Operations under water; notification by operator.

An operator planning to mine coal from coal mines opened after March 30, 1970, or from working sections in mines opened prior to such date, and in such manner that mining operations will be conducted, or tunnels constructed, under any river, stream, lake, or other body of water, shall give notice to the Coal Mine Safety District Manager in the district in which the mine is located prior to the commencement of such mining operations.
§ 706.18 Gifts and gratuities. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, employees shall not solicit or accept, directly or indirectly, any gift, gratuity, favor, entertainment, loan, or any other thing of monetary value, from a coal company which: ( 1 ) Conducts or is seeking to conduct operations or activities that are regulated by the Federal Government; or
( 2 ) Has interests that may be substantially affected by the performance or nonperformance of the employee's official duty.
( b ) The prohibitions in paragraph (a) of this section do not apply in the context of obvious family or personal relationships, such as those between the parents, children, or spouse of the employee and the employee, when the circumstances make it clear that it is those relationships rather than the business of the persons concerned which are the motivating factors. An employee may accept: ( 1 ) Food and refreshments of nominal value on infrequent occasions in the ordinary course of a luncheon, dinner, or other meeting where an employee may properly be in attendance, and
( 2 ) Unsolicited advertising or promotional material, such as pens, pencils, note pads, calendars and other items of nominal value.
( c ) Employees found guilty of violating the provisions of this section will be subject to administrative remedies in accordance with existing Federal regulations or policies.
#### Sol Rosen, Respondent, v. Bertha Shear et al., Appellants.

Motion [two decisions] to dismiss appeal denied on condition that appellants argue or submit the appeal on October 31, I960, for which day the appeal is ordered to be placed on the calendar peremptorily against appellants. The record and appellants’ brief must be served and filed on or before October 17, 1960. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
#### National Carloading Corporation, Appellant, v. Holland-America Line, Respondent. National Carloading Corporation, Respondent, v. United States Trucking Corp. (Century Division), Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Orders, entered on May 14, 1962, denying motions to dismiss certain defenses and counterclaims of defendant-respondent Holland-America Line and seeking other alternative relief, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of striking the second partial affirmative defense, the first, second and third complete affirmative defenses, and dismissing the counterclaims and, in the exercise of discretion, granting leave to defendant-respondent to replead such defenses and counterclaims, and the orders are otherwise affirmed, with costs •to abide the event of the action. The pleading attacked is obscure in theory, verbose in the detail of matters of evidence, vague and indefinite in alleging critical ultimate facts, and the affirmative defenses are conclusory. Under rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice and section 241 of the Civil Practice Act it may not stand. It cannot be said at this time, however, that a proper pleading may not be alleged, and leave to replead is therefore merited. Concur —• Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
# C_2023111EN.01000401.xml

| 27.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/4

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 111/04)

Decision partially granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2023) 1725 | 20 March 2023 | 4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated (‘4-tert-OPnEO’)
  EC No.-; CAS No.- | Becton Dickinson Distribution Center NV, Laagstraat 57, 9140 Temse, Belgium | REACH/23/8/0 | As a processing aid for specific processes in diagnostic instruments or in laboratory activities, as listed in the Annex | 4 January 2028 | In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies. |

Reference of the decision (2)

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2023) 1725

20 March 2023

4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated (‘4-tert-OPnEO’)

EC No.-; CAS No.-

Becton Dickinson Distribution Center NV, Laagstraat 57, 9140 Temse, Belgium

REACH/23/8/0

As a processing aid for specific processes in diagnostic instruments or in laboratory activities, as listed in the Annex

4 January 2028

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu).

---
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the quarterly report of The Dewey Electronics
Corporation (the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John H. D. Dewey, Chief Executive
Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS 1350, as
adopted pursuant to SS 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Corporation.

/s/ John H.D. Dewey
John H. D. Dewey, Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 13, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to The Dewey Electronics Corporation and will be retained
by The Dewey Electronics Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Federal Reserve Act Amendments

              																	United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs. Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy, 1977-1995					,	Bricker, John W. (John William), 1893-1986					 and 	Ninety-Fifth Congress, 1977-1979. 						*Federal Reserve Act Amendments : Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy of the Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs, House of Representatives, Ninety-Fifth Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 12621, H.R. 13148, July 14, 1978*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										July 14, 1978,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1017,			accessed on September 1, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 22, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 83515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28210]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[S-196-2020]


Approval of Subzone Status; MANE USA, Wayne and Parsippany, New 
Jersey

    On November 2, 2020, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade 
Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the State of New 
Jersey Department of State, grantee of FTZ 44, requesting subzone 
status subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 44, on behalf of 
MANE USA, in Wayne and Parsippany, New Jersey.
    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and 
Regulations, including notice in the Federal Register inviting public 
comment (85 FR 70581, November 5, 2020). The FTZ staff examiner 
reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for 
approval. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board 
Executive Secretary (15 CFR Sec. 400.36(f)), the application to 
establish Subzone 44M was approved on December 17, 2020, subject to the 
FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.13, and 
further subject to FTZ 44's 407.5-acre activation limit.

    Dated: December 17, 2020.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-28210 Filed 12-21-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P