alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 77.1602 Use of aerial tramways to transport persons. Persons other than maintenance men shall not ride empty buckets on aerial tramways unless the following features are provided: ( a ) Two independent brakes, each capable of holding the maximum load.
( b ) Direct communication between terminals.
( c ) Power drives with emergency power available in case of primary power failure.
( d ) Buckets equipped with positive locks to prevent accidental tripping or dumping.
§ 823.11 Applicability. The requirements of this part shall not apply to— ( a ) Coal preparation plants, support facilities, and roads of surface and underground mines that are actively used over extended periods of time and where such uses affect a minimal amount of land. Such uses shall meet the requirements of part 816 of this chapter for surface mining activities and of part 817 of this chapter for underground mining activities;
( b ) Disposal areas containing coal mine waste resulting from underground mines that is not technologically and economically feasible to store in underground mines or on non-prime farmland. The operator shall minimize the area of prime farmland used for such purposes.
( c ) Prime farmland that has been excluded in accordance with § 785.17(a) of this chapter.
[48 FR 21463, May 12, 1983, as amended at 53 FR 40839, Oct. 18, 1988] Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 50 FR 7278, Feb. 21, 1985, § 823.11, paragraph (a) was suspended “insofar as it excludes from the requirements of part 823 those coal preparation plants, support facilities, and roads that are surface mining activities”.
Editorial Note on Part 780
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54949, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 780 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93330, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 780.10 Information collection. ( a ) The collections of information contained in part 780 have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* and assigned clearance number 1029-0036. The information will be used by the regulatory authority to determine whether the applicant can comply with the applicable performance and environmental standards in Public Law 95-87. Response is required to obtain a benefit.
( b ) Public Reporting burden for this information is estimated to average 28 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 1951 Constitution Ave. NW., Room 203, Washington, DC 20240; and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project 1029-0036, Washington, DC 20503.
[79 FR 76228, Dec. 22, 2014, as amended at 81 FR 93330, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54949, Nov. 17, 2017]
#### § 56.11012 Protection for openings around travelways.

Openings above, below, or near travelways through which persons or materials may fall shall be protected by railings, barriers, or covers. Where it is impractical to install such protective devices, adequate warning signals shall be installed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
DIAGNOSTIC/RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000028630
<NAME> DIAGNOSTIC/RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS, INC.
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       8,496,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               28,660,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 19,752,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            58,849,000
<PP&E>                                      44,477,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              26,707,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              92,822,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       25,771,000
<BONDS>                                     32,524,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        60,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,143,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                92,822,000
<SALES>                                     33,440,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,440,000
<CGS>                                       30,408,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               30,408,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             903,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,289,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   893,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,396,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
        

</TABLE>
# C_2023300EN.01000201.xml

| 25.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11203 – PAI PARTNERS / ECF)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 300/02)

On 21 August 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11203. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11203. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9816 

To revise the dollar amount limitations for rural housing repair loans under 

section 504 of the Housing Act of 1949, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 

Mr. DAVIS of North Carolina (for himself and Mr. NUNN of Iowa) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To revise the dollar amount limitations for rural housing 

repair loans under section 504 of the Housing Act of 

1949, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Housing Assist5 ance Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SECTION 504 RURAL HOUSING REPAIR LOANS. 

7 Section 504(a) of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 

8 U.S.C. 1474(a)) is amended— 

9 (1) by striking the third sentence and inserting 

10 the following: ‘‘The maximum aggregate amount of 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9816 IH

1 outstanding loans under this section to one house2 hold for one dwelling shall not exceed $80,000, the 

3 maximum aggregate amount of grants under this 

4 section to one household for one dwelling shall not 

5 exceed $20,000, and the maximum aggregate 

6 amount of loans and grants under this section to one 

7 household for one dwelling shall not exceed 

8 $100,000.’’; and 

9 (2) in the fourth sentence, by striking ‘‘$7,500’’ 

10 and inserting ‘‘$15,000’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.1714-3 Self-rescue devices; inspection, testing, maintenance, repair, and recordkeeping. ( a ) Each operator shall provide for proper inspection, testing, maintenance, and repair of self-rescue devices by a person trained to perform such functions.
( b ) After each time a self-rescue device is worn or carried by a person, the device shall be inspected for damage and for the integrity of its seal by a person trained to perform this function. Self-rescue devices with broken seals or which are damaged so that the device will not function properly shall be removed from service.
( c ) All FSRs approved by MSHA and NIOSH under 42 CFR part 84, except devices using vacuum containers as the only method of sealing, shall be tested at intervals not exceeding 90 days by weighing each device on a scale or balance accurate to within + 1 gram. A device that weighs more than 10 grams over its original weight shall be removed from service.
( d ) All SCSRs approved by MSHA and NIOSH under 42 CFR part 84 shall be tested in accordance with instructions approved by MSHA and NIOSH. Any device which does not meet the specified test requirements shall be removed from service.
( e ) At the completion of each test required by paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section the person making the tests shall certify by signature and date that the tests were done. This person shall make a record of all corrective action taken. Certifications and records shall be kept at the mine and made available on request to an authorized representative of the Secretary.
( f ) Self-rescue devices removed from service shall be repaired for return to service only by a person trained to perform such work and only in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
[43 FR 54246, Nov. 21, 1978, as amended at 47 FR 14706, Apr. 6, 1982; 56 FR 1478, Jan. 14, 1991; 60 FR 30402, June 8, 1995; 60 FR 33723, June 29, 1995]
#### WORTHINGTON v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. WORTHINGTON et al. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

Nos. 11802, 11803.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 17, 1954.

Ed W. Worthington, in pro per.

H. Brian Holland, Kenneth W. Gem-mill, Ellis N. Slack, Wm. L. Norton, Jr., and Dudley J. Godfrey, Jr., Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN and McAL-LISTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In these proceedings to redetermine deficiencies found by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in the taxpayers’ income taxes covering the taxable years 1946, 1947, 1948 and 1949, the petitioning taxpayer, Ed W. Worthington, appeared in propria persona at the hearing before this court. Case No. 11,802 relates to deficiencies in income taxes of taxpayer Ed W. Worthington for the taxable years 1946 and 1947; and Case No. 11,803, in which Worthington’s wife, Maxine Worthington, joined him as a petitioner, relates to the taxable years 1948 and 1949.

The Tax Court of the United States dismissed both cases, on motion of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, for the reason that it appeared from the record presented and the evidence submitted that the petitions had not been filed with the court within the time prescribed by the statute.

 Upon consideration of the arguments made at the hearing before us and the briefs filed herein, and on review of the whole record, the finding of the Tax Court that the petitions had not been filed within the time prescribed is supported by the evidence and is not clearly *132erroneous. The Tax Court properly held that it had no jurisdiction, for the reason that the required petitions for rede-termination to be filed by the taxpayers were not filed within ninety days after the mailing of the notices of deficiency, as provided in section 272(a) of' the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A.

The instant cases are clearly distinguishable from Central Paper Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 6 Cir., 199 F.2d 902; and Detroit Automotive Products Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 6 Cir., 203 F.2d 785. The following cases are considered to be in point and to support the conclusion which we have reached, that the Tax Court ruled correctly that it did not possess jurisdiction to consider and act upon the petitions of the taxpayers. DiPros-pero v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 9 Cir., 176 F.2d 76; Poynor v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 5 Cir., 81 F.2d 521.

The decisions of the Tax Court in these two cases are affirmed; and it is so ordered.
#### HALL, Appellant, v. GILMAN et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 6, 1903.)

Action by Helen P. Hall against Theophilus Gilman and others.

V. P. Donihee, for appellant. R. J. Moses, for respondents.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
#### Pauline Callahan, Appellant, v. Syracuse Transit Corporation et al., Defendants, and S. J. Groves & Sons Company et al., Respondents.

Same decision and like cause of action as in companion case of *Callahan*v. *Syracuse Tr. Corp.*(16 A D 2d 746).
SERVED FEBRUARY 18,2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

>cDt Of TPmSPOWON 

DOnKBS 

D 1- CM 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CENTRAL FLYING SERVICE, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CPl OS WOOOl 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMSNO.FAA-2010-0016 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2009SW110011) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

Ronnie A., 

Chief Adminii aw Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CPlOSWOOOl 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Central Flying Service, Inc., Respondent 

Attention: Richard N. Holbert, President 

1501 Bond Street 

Little Rock, AR 72202 

TEL: 501-375-3245 

FAX: 501-375-7274 

Stellamaris Williams, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Fort Worth, TX 76193-0007 

TEL: 817-222-5081 

FAX: 817-222-5092 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building - Room 

2014, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
#### § 769.15 Intervention.

Up to 3 days before the OSM holds a hearing on a petition under § 769.17, any person may intervene in the proceeding by filing a statement describing how the designation directly affects the intervenor, allegations of facts and supporting evidence, a short statement identifying the petition to which the allegations pertain, and the intervenor's name, address and telephone number.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 15



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 5th Street, N.W.
Judiciary Plaza
Washington, D.C. 20549

We are aware that our report dated April 15, 1998, on our review of the interim
financial information of Dexter Corporation as of March 31, 1998 and 1997, and
for the three month periods then ended, and included in this Form 10 - Q is
incorporated by reference in the company's registration statements on Form S -
8, Registration Nos. 2 - 63959, 33 - 27597, 33 - 53307, 33 - 53309, 333 - 02985,
333 - 04081, and 333 - 42663. Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act
of 1933, this report should not be considered a part of the registration
statements prepared or certified by us within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11
of that Act.



/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Springfield, Massachusetts
May 8, 1998
#### In the Matter of Vincent S. Albini, an Alleged Incompetent. Margaret Franzese, Appellant; Seth Rubenstein, as Special Guardian, et al., Respondents.

-In a proceeding to appoint a committee of the person and property of Vincent S. Albini, an alleged incompetent (who has since died), Margaret Franzese (the said Albini’s daughter) appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 20, 1962, as granted the special guardian’s motion and directed the appellant Franzese to pay two thirds of the fee of the respondent Greenstein, who is the doctor designated by the court to examine the alleged incompetent and to report his findings. Order, insofar as appealed from, reversed, without costs, and motion, insofar as it seeks to impose upon appellant the obligation to pay any portion of the doctor’s -fee, denied. The record discloses: (1) that the appellant never appeared in the proceeding and was not a party thereto; and (2) that the proceeding abated upon the alleged incompetent’s death on May 2, 1962. Under such circumstances, it is our opinion that the Special Term lacked jurisdiction to direct the appellant to pay any part of the doctor’s fee. Moreover, on the record as presented, the propriety of the doctor’s designation has not been established. (See *Matter of Stolworthy,*18 A D 2d 692). [For prior and related appeals, see *Matter of Albini,*15 AD 2d 675; *Garletta*v. *Albini,*14 A D 2d 813.] Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.
#### § 845.14 Determination of amount of penalty.

The Office shall determine the amount of any civil penalty by converting the total number of points assigned under 30 CFR 845.13 to a dollar amount, according to the following schedule:

| Points | Dollars |
| --- | --- |
| 1 | 82 |
| 2 | 164 |
| 3 | 246 |
| 4 | 327 |
| 5 | 410 |
| 6 | 491 |
| 7 | 573 |
| 8 | 651 |
| 9 | 736 |
| 10 | 819 |
| 11 | 899 |
| 12 | 982 |
| 13 | 1,061 |
| 14 | 1,145 |
| 15 | 1,230 |
| 16 | 1,309 |
| 17 | 1,391 |
| 18 | 1,475 |
| 19 | 1,555 |
| 20 | 1,636 |
| 21 | 1,720 |
| 22 | 1,801 |
| 23 | 1,882 |
| 24 | 1,963 |
| 25 | 2,045 |
| 26 | 2,455 |
| 27 | 2,864 |
| 28 | 3,271 |
| 29 | 3,527 |
| 30 | 4,091 |
| 31 | 4,499 |
| 32 | 4,910 |
| 33 | 5,319 |
| 34 | 5,729 |
| 35 | 6,137 |
| 36 | 6,547 |
| 37 | 6,956 |
| 38 | 7,365 |
| 39 | 7,773 |
| 40 | 8,182 |
| 41 | 8,594 |
| 42 | 9,002 |
| 43 | 9,408 |
| 44 | 9,819 |
| 45 | 10,228 |
| 46 | 10,638 |
| 47 | 11,046 |
| 48 | 11,457 |
| 49 | 11,864 |
| 50 | 12,273 |
| 51 | 12,681 |
| 52 | 13,093 |
| 53 | 13,502 |
| 54 | 13,912 |
| 55 | 14,322 |
| 56 | 14,730 |
| 57 | 15,137 |
| 58 | 15,546 |
| 59 | 15,957 |
| 60 | 16,365 |
| 61 | 16,774 |
| 62 | 17,183 |
| 63 | 17,593 |
| 64 | 18,002 |
| 65 | 18,410 |
| 66 | 18,821 |
| 67 | 19,230 |
| 68 | 19,637 |
| 69 | 20,047 |
| 70 | 20,457 |

Table 1 to § 845.14

[47 FR 35640, Aug. 16, 1982, as amended at 62 FR 63276, Nov. 28, 1997; 66 FR 58647, Nov. 21, 2001; 70 FR 70701, Nov. 22, 2005; 74 FR 34493, July 15, 2009; 79 FR 18447, Apr. 2, 2014; 81 FR 44541, July 8, 2016; 82 FR 9354, Feb. 6, 2017; 83 FR 10616, Mar. 12, 2018; 84 FR 10676, Mar. 22, 2019; 85 FR 20835, Apr. 15, 2020; 86 FR 29514, June 2, 2021; 87 FR 15886, Mar. 21, 2022; 88 FR 24336, Apr. 20, 2023; 89 FR 23911, Apr. 5, 2024]
### §2014. Annuitants

Persons who are annuitants under the system are—

(1) those persons who, on the basis of their service in the Agency, have met all requirements for an annuity under this subchapter or any other Act and are receiving an annuity from the fund; and

(2) those persons who, on the basis of someone else's service, meet all the requirements under this subchapter or any other Act for an annuity payable from the fund.

(Pub. L. 88–643, title II, §204, as added Pub. L. 102–496, title VIII, §802, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3202.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 204 of Pub. L. 88–643, title II, Oct. 13, 1964, 78 Stat. 1044; Pub. L. 91–626, §1, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1872; Pub. L. 94–552, title II, §201, Oct. 17, 1976, 90 Stat. 2468; Pub. L. 97–269, title VI, §602, Sept. 27, 1982, 96 Stat. 1145; Pub. L. 99–335, title V, §501(2), June 6, 1986, 100 Stat. 622; Pub. L. 102–88, title III, §302, Aug. 14, 1991, 105 Stat. 431; Pub. L. 102–183, title III, §§302(c), 310(a), Dec. 4, 1991, 105 Stat. 1263, 1266, related to annuitants under the system and was set out as a note under section 403 of this title prior to the general amendment of Pub. L. 88–643 by section 802 of Pub. L. 102–496.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on first day of fourth month beginning after Oct. 24, 1992, see section 805 of Pub. L. 102–496, set out as a note under section 2001 of this title.
### §3995. Mineral permits and leases

#### (a) Suspension during military service

A person holding a permit or lease on the public domain under the Federal mineral leasing laws who enters military service may suspend all operations under the permit or lease for the duration of military service and for 180 days thereafter. The term of the permit or lease shall not run during the period of suspension, nor shall any rental or royalties be charged against the permit or lease during the period of suspension.

#### (b) Notification

In order to obtain the protection of this section, the permittee or lessee shall, within 180 days after entry into military service, notify the Secretary of the Interior by registered mail of the fact that military service has begun and of the desire to hold the claim under this section.

#### (c) Contract modification

This section shall not be construed to supersede the terms of any contract for operation of a permit or lease.

(Oct. 17, 1940, ch. 888, title V, §505, as added Pub. L. 108–189, §1, Dec. 19, 2003, 117 Stat. 2857.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 565 of the former Appendix to this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 505 of act Oct. 17, 1940, ch. 888, art. V, 54 Stat. 1188; Pub. L. 102–12, §9(20), Mar. 18, 1991, 105 Stat. 41, related to mining claims and the suspension of requirements, prior to the general amendment of this Act by Pub. L. 108–189. See section 3994 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to any case not final before Dec. 19, 2003, see section 3 of Pub. L. 108–189, set out as a note under section 3901 of this title.