alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 7.63 Application requirements. ( a ) Each application for approval of a blasting unit shall include the following: ( 1 ) An overall assembly drawing showing the physical construction of the blasting unit.
( 2 ) A schematic diagram of the electric circuit.
( 3 ) A parts list specifying each electric component and its electrical ratings, including tolerances.
( 4 ) A layout drawing showing the location of each component and wiring.
( 5 ) The model number or other manufacturer's designation of the blasting unit.
( b ) All drawings shall be titled, numbered, dated, and include the latest revision number. The drawings may be combined into one or more composite drawings.
( c ) The application shall contain a list of all the drawings submitted, including drawing titles, numbers, and revisions.
( d ) A detailed technical description of the operation and use of the blasting unit shall be submitted with the application.
[54 FR 48210, Nov. 21, 1989, as amended at 60 FR 33723, June 29, 1995]
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  As Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DRS Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark S. Newman, Chief Executive Officer of DRS Technologies, Inc., certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



August 8, 2008

/s/MARK S. NEWMANMark S. Newman Chief Executive Officer


A
SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO DRS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND WILL BE
RETAINED BY DRS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

---



QuickLinks
# C_2023300EN.01000401.xml

| 25.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/4

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2023/C 300/04)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 1.5.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 1.5.2023 – 31.12.2023 |
| Member State | Spain |
| Stock or Group of stocks | RJU/8-C. |
| Species | Undulate ray (Raja undulata) |
| Zone | Union waters of 8 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 08/TQ194 |

Date and time of closure

1.5.2023

Duration

1.5.2023 – 31.12.2023

Member State

Spain

Stock or Group of stocks

RJU/8-C.

Species

Undulate ray (Raja undulata)

Zone

Union waters of 8

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

08/TQ194

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 31.1

Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer

I,
Brian D. Finn, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: May 12, 2004 |  | /s/BRIAN D. FINNName: Brian D. Finn
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
|------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 245 (Monday, December 21, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 83106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28045]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Clean 
Water Act

    On December 15, 2020, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed 
consent decree with the United States District Court for the Central 
District of California in the lawsuit entitled United States v. Parker-
Hannifin Corp., Civil Action No. 2:20-cv-11332.
    The United States filed this lawsuit under the Clean Water Act. The 
United States' complaint seeks injunctive relief and civil penalties 
for violations of pretreatment standards that govern wastewater 
discharges to a publicly owned treatment works at the defendant's 
membrane and filter manufacturing facility in Oxnard, California. The 
consent decree requires the defendant to perform injunctive relief and 
pay a $390,000 civil penalty.
    The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on 
the consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and 
should refer to United States v. Parker-Hannifin Corp., D.J. Ref. No. 
90-5-1-1-12081. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty 
(30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be 
submitted either by email or by mail:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
         To submit comments:                     Send them to:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
By e-mail...........................  <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#51212433323e3c3c343f257c3434227f343f2335112422353e3b7f363e27"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4e3e3b2c2d2123232b203a632b2b3d602b203c2a0e3b3d2a212460292138">[email protected]</span></a>
By mail.............................  Assistant Attorney General, U.S.
                                       DOJ--ENR, P.O. Box 7611,
                                       Washington, DC 20044-7611.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    During the public comment period, the consent decree may be 
examined and downloaded at this Justice Department website: https://www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees. We will provide a paper copy of 
the consent decree upon written request and payment of reproduction 
costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent Decree Library, 
U.S. DOJ--ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.
    Please enclose a check or money order for $8.00 (25 cents per page 
reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury.

Lori Jonas,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment 
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2020-28045 Filed 12-18-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### §30501. Lessons learned and best practices

(a) In General.—The Administrator shall transmit to the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate an implementation plan describing the Administration's approach for obtaining, implementing, and sharing lessons learned and best practices for its major programs and projects not later than 180 days after December 30, 2005. The implementation plan shall be updated and maintained to ensure that it is current and consistent with the burgeoning culture of learning and safety that is emerging at the Administration.

(b) Required Content.—The implementation plan shall contain at a minimum the lessons learned and best practices requirements for the Administration, the organizations or positions responsible for enforcement of the requirements, the reporting structure, and the objective performance measures indicating the effectiveness of the activity.

(c) Incentives.—The Administrator shall provide incentives to encourage sharing and implementation of lessons learned and best practices by employees, projects, and programs, as well as penalties for programs and projects that are determined not to have demonstrated use of those resources.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3367.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30501 | 42 U.S.C. 16615. | Pub. L. 109–155, title I, §107, Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2912. |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "Committee on Science and Technology" are substituted for "Committee on Science" on authority of Rule X(1)(o) of the Rules of the House of Representatives, adopted by House Resolution No. 6 (110th Congress, January 5, 2007).

In subsection (a), the date "December 30, 2005" is substituted for "the date of enactment of this Act" to reflect the date of enactment of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2005 (Public Law 109–155, 119 Stat. 2895).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Science and Technology of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, Jan. 5, 2011.
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.1100-3 Condition and examination of firefighting equipment.

All firefighting equipment shall be maintained in a usable and operative condition. Chemical extinguishers shall be examined every 6 months and the date of the examination shall be written on a permanent tag attached to the extinguisher.

[35 FR 17890, Nov. 20, 1970, as amended at 60 FR 33723, June 29, 1995]
# C_2023175EN.01000601.xml

| 17.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/6

---

Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Imposition of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 175/05)

| Member State | France |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Poitiers (Biard) – Lyon (Saint-Exupéry) |
| Original date of entry into force of the public service obligation | 1 November 2005 |
| Date of entry into force of the changes | 1 November 2023 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained | Order of 29 March 2023 imposing public service obligations on air services between Poitiers and Lyon
  NOR: TREA2308060A
  http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do
  For further information please contact:





  Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile |
| DTA/SDS1 |
| 50 rue Henry Farman |
| 75720 Paris CEDEX 15 |
| FRANCE |

Member State

France

Route concerned

Poitiers (Biard) – Lyon (Saint-Exupéry)

Original date of entry into force of the public service obligation

1 November 2005

Date of entry into force of the changes

1 November 2023

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained

Order of 29 March 2023 imposing public service obligations on air services between Poitiers and Lyon

NOR: TREA2308060A

http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do

For further information please contact:

Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile

DTA/SDS1

50 rue Henry Farman

75720 Paris CEDEX 15

FRANCE

Tel. +33 158094321

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0196 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MICHAEL PAUL SULLIVAN,

Defendant and Appellant

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 21 , 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 15 2024

05/15/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0196
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **2 -**  **7293**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. CHARLETTE DUFRAY JOHNSON, a/k/a Charlotte Johnson , Defendant

- A ppellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington

. W. Earl Britt , Senior District Judge. ( 7:10

- cr - 00093

- BR

- 1 ; 7:12

- cv - 00209

- BR )

Submitted : September 21, 2012 Decided: October 12, 2012

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Charlette Dufray Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May

Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina , for Appellee.

Unpublished opi nions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Charlette Dufray Johnson seeks to appeal the district
court’s order dismissing without prejudice her 28 U.S.C. A.

§ 2255 ( West Supp. 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit ju stice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of
the denial of a constitutional r ight.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2)

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
Johnson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

* Because Johnson’s § 2255 motion was dismissed without prejudice as premature, she is not precluded from filing a timely § 2255 motion after her convictions and sentence become final.
#### John M. Moore *v.*The People *ex rel.*Patrick J. Dunne.

*Filed at Springfield June 11, 1896*

*Rehearing denied January 14, 1897.*

This case is controlled by the opinion in *People ex rel.*v. *O'Toole, (ante,*p. 344.)

*People ex rel.*v. *Moore,*60 Ill. App. 547, reversed.

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. John Gibbons, Judge, presiding.

P. T. Keily, and F. H. Atwood, for appellant.

*411Jacob J. Kern, State’s Attorney, and Julius & L. Rosenthal, (T. A. Coffey, of counsel,) for appellee.

Mr. Justice Cartwright

delivered the opinion of the court:

An information in the nature of a *quo warranto*was filed by the State’s attorney of Cook county, on the relation of Patrick J. Dunne, against the appellant, charging that he had usurped and intruded himself into the office of justice of the peace of the town of Lake, in Chicago, Cook county. The circuit court found the defendant not guilty. That judgment was reversed by the Appellate Court and the cause' was remanded, with directions to enter a judgment of ouster against appellant, with a nominal fine.

The questions involved in this case are the same as in the case of *People ex rel.*v. *O’Toole, (ante,*p. 344.) The appellant was recommended by the judges of the courts of record of Cook county to succeed himself in the office of justice of the peace. The Governor appointed and commissioned, as the successor of appellant, one John Fitzgerald, who had not been recommended as such successor, but who was recommended to succeed one J. J. Hennessy, and said Fitzgerald was designated by the county clerk to succeed appellant.

We have held in the case of *People ex rel.*v. *O’Toole*that the Governor has no power to appoint to the office of justice of the peace any person other than the one recommended by a majority of the judges, and that the county clerk has no power to designate what office the person appointed shall hold. The decision |n that case will control the judgment in this, and the judgment of the Appellate Court will therefore be reversed and that of the circuit court affirmed.

T ** * Judgment reversed.*
EXHIBIT 32.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
               RULE 13a-14(b)



In connection with the Annual Report of Gallery of History, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Todd Axelrod, Chief Executive Office of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge, that:

1.	 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



/s/ Todd Axelrod
________________
Todd Axelrod
Chief Executive Officer

December 28, 2005


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Dewey Electronics
Corporation (the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John H. D. Dewey, Chief Executive
Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS 1350, as
adopted pursuant to SS 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Corporation.

/s/ John H.D. Dewey
John H. D. Dewey, Chief Executive Officer
Date:  February 17, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to The Dewey Electronics Corporation and will be retained
by The Dewey Electronics Corporation and furnished to the Securities
and exchange commission or its staff upon request.





EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Dewey Electronics
Corporation (the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen P. Krill, Treasurer of the
Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS 1350, as adopted pursuant
to SS 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Corporation.

/s/ Stephen P. Krill
Stephen P. Krill, Treasurer
Date:  February 17, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to The Dewey Electronics Corporation and will be retained
by The Dewey Electronics Corporation and furnished to the Securities
and exchange commission or its staff upon request.
#### Bessie Siegel et al., Respondents, v. City of New York et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, medical expenses and loss of services, each defendant appeals as follows from a separate order of the Supreme Court, Kings County: (1) Defendant Misboff appeals from an order, dated October 11, 1961, which denied his motion to dismiss the complaint for plaintiffs’ lack of prosecution, on condition that plaintiffs notice the ease for trial for the December 1961 Term; (2) defendant City of New York appeals from an order dated October 17, 1961, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to open their default upon a prior motion by the defendant city to dismiss the complaint for plaintiffs’ lack of prosecution, and which denied the city’s said motion on condition that plaintiffs notice the ease for trial for the December 1961 Term. Orders reversed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements to each defendant; and the motion of each defendant to dismiss the complaint is granted. Plaintiffs failed adequately to explain or show reasonable excuse for the delay of three years and nine *680months since joinder of issue in bringing the cause on for trial. Plaintiffs also failed to make a sufficient showing of merits. Under such circumstances, it was an improvident exercise of discretion not to grant unconditionally the respective motions to dismiss *(Topp*v. *Casco Prods. Corp.,*8 A D 2d 727, appeal dismissed 7 N Y 2d 742; *Lange*v. *Bagish,*285 App. Div. 833). Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Serious Human Rights Abuse and Corruption

                        On December 20, 2017, by Executive Order 13818, the President declared a national emergency with respect to serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world and, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701*et seq.*), took related steps to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States.                    

The prevalence and severity of human rights abuse and corruption that have their source, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States, continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared on December 20, 2017, must continue in effect beyond December 20, 2020. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13818 with respect to serious human rights abuse and corruption.

                        This notice shall be published in the                         *Federal Register*                         and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. 2020-28154

Billing code 3295-F1-P