alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3432 

To create a system of background checks for certain workers who enter 

people’s homes, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 26, 2005 

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To create a system of background checks for certain workers 

who enter people’s homes, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Domestic Consumer 

5 Safety Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. BACKGROUND CHECKS FOR PEOPLE WHO WORK IN 

7 HOMES. 

8 The Federal Trade Commission shall make rules, on 

9 the record after opportunity for an agency hearing, to as10 sure that businesses in commerce that send employees into 
2 

•HR 3432 IH 

1 people’s homes perform adequate and appropriate back2 ground checks on those employees. 

3 SEC. 3. SANCTIONS. 

4 Whoever violates a rule made by the Federal Trade 

5 Commission under section 2 shall be liable for a civil pen6 alty of not more than $1,000,000. 

7 SEC. 4. DEFINITION. 

8 As used in this Act, the term ‘‘business in commerce’’ 

9 means a business that is in or affects interstate or foreign 

10 commerce. 

Æ
EXHIBIT 13.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of RADA Electronic Industries Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Elan Sigal, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Elan Sigal *
----------------
Elan Sigal
Chief Financial Officer
March 30, 2006

     * The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at
the Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
# C_2023243EN.01001201.xml

| 10.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/12

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.11181 – MACQUARIE / BCI / ENDEAVOUR ENERGY)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 243/08)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Macquarie Group Limited (‘Macquarie’, Australia), |
| --- | --- |

—

Macquarie Group Limited (‘Macquarie’, Australia),

| — | British Columbia Investment Management Corporation (‘BCI’, Canada), |
| --- | --- |

—

British Columbia Investment Management Corporation (‘BCI’, Canada),

| — | Endeavour Energy (‘EE’, Australia). |
| --- | --- |

—

Endeavour Energy (‘EE’, Australia).

Macquarie and BCI will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of EE.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | Macquarie provides asset management and finance, banking, advisory and risk and capital solutions across debt, equity and commodities, |
| --- | --- |

—

Macquarie provides asset management and finance, banking, advisory and risk and capital solutions across debt, equity and commodities,

| — | BCI is an agent of the Government of British Columbia in Canada and is active across a range of asset classes, including fixed income, public equities, private equity, infrastructure, renewable resources, real estate and commercial mortgages. |
| --- | --- |

—

BCI is an agent of the Government of British Columbia in Canada and is active across a range of asset classes, including fixed income, public equities, private equity, infrastructure, renewable resources, real estate and commercial mortgages.

| — | EE owns and operates an electricity distribution network located in New South Wales, Australia. |
| --- | --- |

—

EE owns and operates an electricity distribution network located in New South Wales, Australia.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.11181 – MACQUARIE / BCI / ENDEAVOUR ENERGY

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCOT-12-0000678 26-SEP-2012 10:55 AM

NO. SCOT-12-0000678 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I ARWIN R. ECHINEQUE, Petitioner,
vs. STATE OF HAWAI ' I, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.) On September 10, 2012, plaintiff Arwin R. Echineque filed a complaint in this court. This court, however, lacks jurisdiction to consider the complaint. See HRS § 602-5 (Supp. 2011). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint is dismissed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall not accept any further filings in this case. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, September 26, 2012. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack
#### Harry A. Shaeffer, Respondent, v. Arthur R. Lerch, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: The plaintiff has sued to recover money loaned to the defendant. The defense is that the money received from the plaintiff was not loaned but was in payment of the purchase price of certain shares of stock. The plaintiff in turn claims that the stock was.issued to him and his daughter as collateral security for the alleged loan. The stock certificate was placed in evidence by the plaintiff. No tax stamps were affixed. In the charge to the jury, the court stated that the law required that tax stamps be affixed and since they were not so affixed, the alleged sale of the certificate could not be used as a defense despite proof showing that the transaction was in fact a sale. Following a request by the jury for additional instructions, the court charged in substance that the fact that there were no tax stamps attached to the certificate was conclusive against the defense of sale which, in effect, was a direction of a verdict for the plaintiff. *902This of course was erroneous. Prior to 1945, section 270 of the Tax Law imposed the duty upon the seller to affix the stamps and pay the taxes. In 1945 the law was amended to extend this duty to the transferee as well as the transferor (L. 1945, eh. 141). This amendment effectively nullified the provisions of section 278 of the Tax Law which provides that no stock transfer can be made the basis of any action or legal proceeding nor can proof thereof be received in evidence if the tax is not paid at the time of the transfer. Since 'both parties were obliged to pay the tax, neither could take advantage of the other’s failure *(Green*v. *Green,*7 Misc 2d 324; *Fruitman*v. *Bregman,*196 Misc. 362; *Schlesinger*v. *Kasachkoff,*195 Misc. 448; *Matter of Olson,*119 N. Y. S. 2d 207). The court refused to permit the defendant to introduce an invoice concerning the payment of the stock transfer taxes required by article 12 of the Tax Law. It was also error to refuse to receive this invoice in evidence. The jury could have construed it as showing payment of the taxes by the defendant. In any event, the absence of tax stamps could not bar the defendant from contesting tbe plaintiff’s claim that there had been a loan to the defendant. The defendant was not seeking to enforce the sale in any way — he was simply resisting a claim of a loan which he asserted was false. That was the issue winch should have been submitted to the jury. All concur, except Goldman, J., not participating. (Appeal from judgment and order of Niagara Trial Term for plaintiff in an action to recover amount due on a loan. The order denied a motion for a new trial.) Present — -Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and Henry, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9840 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9840

  To prohibit life insurance providers from discriminating based on a 
   person's status as a living kidney donor, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 25, 2024

Mr. Lawler (for himself, Mr. Davis of North Carolina, and Mr. Van Drew) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit life insurance providers from discriminating based on a 
   person's status as a living kidney donor, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Kidney Donation Anti-Discrimination 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DISCRIMINATION BASED ON LIVING KIDNEY DONOR STATUS.

    (a) In General.--It shall be unlawful to discriminate against a 
living kidney donor, in the offering, issuance, cancellation, price or 
conditions of a life insurance policy, or in the amount of coverage 
provided under a life insurance policy, based solely on the status of 
such person as a living kidney donor, without evidence of additional 
actuarial risks, unrelated to their donation.
    (b) Private Right of Action.--A person who suffers harm as a result 
of a violation of subsection (a) may bring an individual action against 
the entity who discriminated against such person in the appropriate 
district court of the United States for damages and attorney's fees.
    (c) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section may be construed 
to preempt any State or local law that provides greater protection to 
living kidney donors with respect to life insurance than this section 
does.
    (d) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Life insurance policy.--The term ``life insurance 
        policy'' means a contract under which an entity promises to pay 
        a designated beneficiary a sum of money upon the death of the 
        insured.
            (2) Living kidney donor.--The term ``living kidney donor'' 
        means an individual who has donated a kidney and is not 
        deceased.
                                 <all>
```
4050

4000

4050

4100

4100

4000

4100

4150

4100

4050

4100

4050

4100

4050

4150

4150

9

9

9

9

9

C O U N T Y R D -B 0 0 2

C O U N T Y R D -B 0 0 3

C O U N T Y R D -B 0 0 3

C O U N T Y R D -B 0 0 3

C O U N T Y R D -B 0 0 3

C O U N T Y R D -B 0 0 3

9

9

9

9

9

C O U N T Y R D -B 0 0 2

C O U N T Y R D -B 0 0 3

C O U N T Y R D -B 0 0 3

C O U N T Y R D -B 0 0 3

C O U N T Y R D -B 0 0 3

C O U N T Y R D -B 0 0 3

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS

Arena

Coyote

Hill

Coyote

Hill

O'Bryan

Windmill

Mesquite

Lake

Columbus

SE

Camel

Mountain

Columbus

NE

P O L

Ranch

Coyote

Hill

000

2

N

35

30'

72 2

23

24

75 25'

30"

2

35

000m

27'

31°

26

31°

N

30'

22'

21

000m

27

73

000 FEET 2

35

35

28

50'

16

30" 2

50'

72

35

FEET

2

830

70 2

2

35

22

107° 66 2

25

2

35

35

69

18

860 52'

31°

35

2

45'

47'

30"

000m

21

2 266 2

70

31°52'

2

35

27'

310

69

19

67

45'

35

35

35

73

18

71

2

35

35

25'

22'

64 E

35

65

2

35

2

30" 2

107°

107°

17

35

29

35

22

64

68

107°

35

30"

35

23

35

65 2 75

000

000 FEET

16

47'

E

2

35

24

35

2

FEET

30"

30"

30"

35

68

17

280

35

27

20

000m

28

26

25

19

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

NEW MEXICO

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

COYOTE HILL, NM-CHH

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

COYOTE HILL QUADRANGLE

NEW MEXICO-CHIHUAHUA

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 13R

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: New Mexico Coordinate System of 1983

(west zone)

Imagery...............................NAIP, January 2005 - May 2009

Roads..............................................©2006-2010 Tele Atlas

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2005

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2001

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.5.11

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

1° 17 ́

23 MILS

9° 20 ́

166 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

13R

BR

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,051
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,251
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,983)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,838
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,092
<PP&E>                                          14,412
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (10,057)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,613
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,788
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           105
<OTHER-SE>                                        (771)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,613
<SALES>                                         70,978
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,978
<CGS>                                           43,696
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,696
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,957
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   595
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1,181)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9,906)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (266)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (10,172)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (10,172)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.08)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 47.21 Identifying hazardous chemicals.

The operator must evaluate each chemical brought on mine property and each chemical produced on mine property to determine if it is hazardous as specified in Table 47.21 as follows:

| Category | Basis for determining if a chemical is hazardous |
| --- | --- |
| (a) Chemical brought to the mine | The chemical is hazardous when its MSDS or container label indicates it is a physical or health hazard; or the operator may choose to evaluate the chemical using the criteria in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this table. |
| (b) Chemical produced at the mine | The chemical is hazardous if any one of the following that it is a hazard: |
| | (1) Available evidence concerning its physical or health hazards. |
| | (2) MSHA standards in 30 CFR chapter I. |
| | (3) Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), 29 CFR part 1910, subpart Z, *Toxic and Hazardous Substances.* |
| | (4) American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), *Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices* (2001). |
| | (5) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Toxicology Program (NTP), *Ninth Annual Report on Carcinogens,* January 2001. |
| | (6) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Monographs and related supplements, Volumes 1 through 77. |
| (c) Mixture produced at the mine | (1) If a mixture has been tested as a whole to determine its hazards, use the results of that testing. |
| | (2) If a mixture has not been tested as a whole to determine its hazards— |
| | (i) Use available, scientifically valid evidence to determine its physical hazard potential; |
| | (ii) Assume that it presents the same health hazard as a non-carcinogenic component that makes up 1% or more (by weight or volume) of the mixture; and |
| | (iii) Assume that it presents a carcinogenic health hazard if a component considered carcinogenic by NTP or IARC makes up 0.1% or more (by weight or volume) of the mixture. |
| | (3) If evidence indicates that a component could be released from a mixture in a concentration that could present a health risk to miners, assume that the mixture presents the same hazard. |

Table 47.21—Identifying Hazardous Chemicals
§ 77.1911 Ventilation of slopes and shafts. ( a ) All slopes and shafts shall be ventilated by mechanical ventilation equipment during development. Such equipment shall be examined before each shift and the quantity of air in the slope or shaft measured daily by a certified person and the results of such examinations and tests recorded in a book approved by the Secretary.
( b ) Ventilation fans shall be: ( 1 ) Installed on the surface;
( 2 ) Installed in fireproof housing and connected to the slope or shaft opening with fireproof air ducts;
( 3 ) Designed to permit the reversal of the air current, and located in an area which will prevent a recirculation of air from the slope or shaft or air contamination from any other source;
( 4 ) Equipped with an automatic signal device designed to give an alarm in the event the fan slows or stops which can be seen or heard by any person on duty in the vicinity of the fan, except where fans are constantly attended.
( 5 ) Offset not less than 15 feet from the shaft; and
( 6 ) Equipped with air ducts which are fire resistant and maintained so as to prevent excessive leakage of air; ( i ) Flexible ducts shall be constructed to permit ventilation by either exhausting or blowing methods and when metal air ducts are used, they shall be grounded effectively to remove static and other electrical charges;
( ii ) Ducts shall extend as close to the bottom as necessary to ventilate properly.
( c ) A qualified person, designated by the operator, shall be assigned to maintain each ventilating system.
( d ) The fan shall be operated continuously when men are below the surface. Any accidental stoppage or reduction in airflow shall be corrected promptly; however, where repairs cannot be made immediately, development work below the surface shall be stopped and all the men not needed to make necessary repairs shall be removed to the surface.
NUMBER 13-24-00027-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

 

NAHESI PARMES, Appellant,

 v.

FIRST CENTRAL CREDIT UNION, Appellee. 

 

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

of McLennan County, Texas.

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Tijerina, and Silva

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina

On December 1, 2023, appellant Nahesi Parmes filed a pro se notice of appeal 

from an order granting summary judgment in trial court cause number 20221073CV1.

1

On December 1, 2023, the Clerk of the Court requested appellant to pay the $205.00 

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Tenth Court of Appeals pursuant to a docket 

equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001.
2

filing fee within ten days. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (“A party who is not excused by statute or 

these rules from paying costs must pay—at the time an item is presented for filing—

whatever fees are required by statute or Supreme Court order. The appellate court may 

enforce this rule by any order that is just.”); TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207 (delineating 

the required fees and costs in an appellate court).

On December 21, 2023, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the filing fee

was past due and informed him that the appeal would be dismissed if the filing fee was 

not paid. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c). On January 19, 2024, the Clerk again advised appellant 

that the filing fee was past due and informed him that the appeal would be dismissed if 

the filing fee was not paid. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c).

To date, appellant has neither paid the filing fee for the appeal nor responded to 

the Clerk of the Court’s notices. This Court has the authority to dismiss an appeal because 

the appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules, a court order, 

or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time. See 

id. R. 42.3(b), (c); Smith v. DC Civil Constr., LLC, 521 S.W.3d 75, 76 (Tex. App.—San 

Antonio 2017, no pet.). Here, appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee and has not 

otherwise responded to the Clerk’s notices. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

JAIME TIJERINA

Justice

Delivered and filed on the

7th day of March, 2024.