alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9636 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9636

To allow States to require payment of State fees related to boating as 
a condition for issuance of a vessel number and to collect such fees in 
        conjunction with other fees related to vessel numbering.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 17, 2024

 Mr. Pappas (for himself, Mrs. Kiggans of Virginia, Mr. Moore of Utah, 
and Mr. Molinaro) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
           the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To allow States to require payment of State fees related to boating as 
a condition for issuance of a vessel number and to collect such fees in 
        conjunction with other fees related to vessel numbering.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COLLECTION OF STATE FEES RELATED TO BOATING.

    Section 12307 of title 46, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by striking ``The authority'' and inserting 
                ``(a) In General.--The authority'';
                    (B) by striking ``that are--'' and inserting 
                ``that--'';
            (2) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by inserting ``are'' before ``prescribed''; and
                    (B) by striking ``; or'' and inserting a semicolon;
            (3) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) by inserting ``are'' before ``related''; and
                    (B) by striking the period and inserting ``; or''; 
                and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) require the payment of State fees related to boating, 
        which may include fees for search and rescue operations, 
        boating safety measures, or efforts to address aquatic invasive 
        species.
    ``(b) State Fees Related to Boating.--A State issuing authority may 
collect a fee described in subsection (a)(3) in conjunction with the 
collection of any other fee established under this section.
    ``(c) Use of Fees.--Fees collected by States under the authority 
this section may only be used to fund activities directly related to 
improving recreational boating, boater safety, boater access, use of 
waterways by recreational boaters, and aquatic invasive species.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 77.205 Travelways at surface installations. ( a ) Safe means of access shall be provided and maintained to all working places.
( b ) Travelways and platforms or other means of access to areas where persons are required to travel or work, shall be kept clear of all extraneous material and other stumbling or slipping hazards.
( c ) Inclined travelways shall be constructed of nonskid material or equipped with cleats.
( d ) Regularly used travelways shall be sanded, salted, or cleared of snow and ice as soon as practicable.
( e ) Crossovers, elevated walkways, elevated ramps, and stairways shall be of substantial construction, provided with handrails, and maintained in good condition. Where necessary toeboards shall be provided.
( f ) Crossovers shall be provided where it is necessary to cross conveyors.
( g ) Moving conveyors shall be crossed only at designated crossover points.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 22, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 83613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28138]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 3, 2020, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), IMS Global Learning 
Consortium, Inc. (``IMS Global'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Australian Council for Educational 
Research, Camberwell, AUSTRALIA; ClassEDU Inc., Raleigh, NC; GreenLight 
Credentials, Dallas, TX; Magic Software Inc., New York, NY; Manabie 
International Pte Ltd, Singapore, SINGAPORE; Richland School District 
No. 2, Columbia, SC; and Virtual Virginia, Floyd, VA, have been added 
as parties to this venture.
    Also, IBM, Cambridge, MA; Paradigm, Inc., Virginia Beach, VA; 
Badgewell, Giza, EGYPT; VidGrid, St. Paul, MN; and Unox Portal (Pragnya 
Technologies Pty), Sydney, AUSTRALIA, have withdrawn as parties to this 
venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and IMS Global intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On April 7, 2000, IMS Global filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on September 13, 2000 (65 FR 55283).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on September 
16, 2020. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on October 15, 2020 (85 FR 65426).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2020-28138 Filed 12-21-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Panavision Inc.
     (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
     Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
     Bobby G. Jenkins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
     pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
     the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:


              (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


              (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.



         /S/ BOBBY G. JENKINS
     ----------------------------------
     Bobby G. Jenkins
     Chief Financial Officer
     May 9, 2003


     This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
     the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
     of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §36. Preventing landing or operating of cables; injunction

The President is empowered to prevent the landing of any cable about to be landed in violation of sections 34 to 39 of this title. When any such cable is about to be or is landed or is being operated without a license, any district court of the United States exercising jurisdiction in the district in which such cable is about to be or is landed, or any district court of the United States having jurisdiction of the parties, shall have jurisdiction, at the suit of the United States, to enjoin the landing or operation of such cable or to compel, by injunction, the removal thereof.

(May 27, 1921, ch. 12, §3, 42 Stat. 8.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Submarine Cable Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

For delegation of functions vested in President by this section to Federal Communications Commission, see note set out under section 34 of this title.
#### Patricia A. Johnson, Respondent, v NYU Hospitals Center et al., Appellants.

[835 NYS2d 340]—

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for discrimination in employment on the basis of race and sex and retaliation in violation of Executive Law § 296 and New York City Administrative Code § 8-107, the defendants appeal from an order of the *818Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.), dated June 1, 2006, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

“To establish its entitlement to summary judgment in [an intentional] discrimination case, a defendant must demonstrate either the plaintiff’s failure to establish every element of intentional discrimination, or, having offered legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for its challenged actions, the absence of a material issue of fact as to whether the explanations offered by the defendant were pretextual” *(Hemingway v Pelham Country Club,*14 AD3d 536, 536 [2005]). Here, in opposition to the defendants’ prima facie showing, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see*New York City Administrative Code § 8-130; *Forrest v Jewish Guild for the Blind,*3 NY3d 295, 305 [2004]; *Cooks v New York City Tr. Auth.,*289 AD2d 278, 279 [2001]).

The defendants also established their entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs intentional retaliation cause of action by proffering sufficient evidence that the plaintiff was terminated for legitimate, nonretaliatory reasons *(see Thide v New York State Dept. of Transp.,*27 AD3d 452, 454 [2006]; *cf.*New York City Administrative Code § 8-107 [7]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

Since the “plaintiff has failed to raise a triable issue of material fact that she was either retaliated against or discriminated against because of her race [or sex], her claims that defendants aided and abetted each other in any discrimination or retaliation cannot survive” *(Forrest v Jewish Guild for the Blind, supra*at 314).

Similarly, the defendants established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law in connection with the plaintiffs remaining claim of a hostile work environment, and the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Crane,. J.E, Krausman, Goldstein and Dillon, JJ., concur.
§ 90.300T Respirable dust control plan; filing requirements. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 28485 , Apr. 18, 2024.
As of April 14, 2025: ( a ) If an operator abates a violation of the standard by reducing the respirable dust level in the position of the Part 90 miner, the operator shall submit to the District Manager for approval a written respirable dust control plan for the Part 90 miner in the position identified in the citation within 15 calendar days after the citation is terminated. The respirable dust control plan and revisions thereof shall be suitable to the conditions and the mining system of the coal mine and shall be adequate to continuously maintain respirable dust below the standard for that Part 90 miner.
( b ) Each respirable dust control plan shall include at least the following: ( 1 ) The mine identification number assigned by MSHA, the operator's name, mine name, mine address, and mine telephone number and the name, address and telephone number of the principal officer in charge of health and safety at the mine;
( 2 ) The name and MSHA Individual Identification Number of the part 90 miner and the position at the mine to which the plan applies;
( 3 ) A detailed description of how each of the respirable dust control measures used to continuously maintain concentrations of respirable coal mine dust below the standard; and
( 4 ) A detailed description of how each of the respirable dust control measures described in response to paragraph (b)(3) of this section will continue to be used by the operator, including at least the specific time, place, and manner the control measures will be used.
[89 FR 28485, Apr. 18, 2024]
EXHIBIT 10.1

                      AMENDMENT TO ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT

     This Amendment to Asset Purchase Agreement (this "Agreement") is entered
into and effective as of November 15, 2002 (the "Execution Date"), by and
between Project 1000, Inc., a Nevada corporation with a place of business at 668
North 44th Street, Suite 248, Phoenix, Arizona 85008 ("P1"), on the one hand,
and Fan Energy, Inc., a Nevada corporation, with a place of business at 11811
North Tatum Blvd. Suite 3031, Phoenix, AZ 85028 ("FEI"), on the other hand.

     1. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE

     1.1. P1 and FEI originally entered into an original Asset Purchase
Agreement ("APA") on or about February 19, 2002 and thereafter subsequently
amended on May 3, 2002 whereby P1 desired to sell to FEI, and FEI desired to
purchase from P1, certain Assets;

     1.2. In accordance with the terms and conditions of the APA, P1 and FEI
mutually desire to amend the terms and conditions of the APA; and

     1.3. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual
representations, warranties, covenants, agreements and conditions set forth in
this Agreement, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, FEI and P1, intending to be
legally bound, hereby agree as follows:

     2. AMENDMENT

     2.1. Section 10 is hereby amended to read as follows:

          10. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF P1

               10.15. RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL. Pursuant to the terms and subject
          to the conditions of this Agreement and pre-existing contractual
          obligations, P1 hereby grants to FEI an exclusive Right of First
          Refusal ("ROFR") to purchase or license any new optical media
          technology P1 or its parent company, SunnComm, Inc., might develop in
          the future that is specifically related to the Assets acquired as a
          result hereof, even if such technology is not a derivative of the
          original MediaCloQ technology. The specific terms and conditions of
          this ROFR shall be mutually approved by the parties hereto subsequent
          to the effective date hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed
by their duly authorized representatives, effective as of the date first above
written.

 PROJECT 1000, INC.                             FAN ENERGY, INC.


    /s/ William H. Whitmore                         /s/ Al Golusin
    ------------------------------                  ----------------------------
By: William H. Whitmore, President              By: Al Golusin, Secretary
Editorial Note on Part 779
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54948, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 779 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93327, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 779.18 Climatological information. ( a ) When requested by the regulatory authority, the application shall contain a statement of the climatological factors that are representative of the proposed permit area, including: ( 1 ) The average seasonal precipitation;
( 2 ) The average direction and velocity of prevailing winds; and
( 3 ) Seasonal temperature ranges.
( b ) The regulatory authority may request such additional data as deemed necessary to ensure compliance with the requirements of this subchapter.
[44 FR 15354, Mar. 13, 1979, as amended at 45 FR 51550, Aug. 4, 1980; 81 FR 93327, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54948, Nov. 17, 2017]
### §20927. Annual report

Not later than January 31 of each year (beginning with 2004), the Commission shall submit a report to the Committee on House Administration of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate detailing its activities during the fiscal year which ended on September 30 of the previous calendar year, and shall include in the report the following information:

(1) A detailed description of activities conducted with respect to each program carried out by the Commission under this chapter, including information on each grant or other payment made under such programs.

(2) A copy of each report submitted to the Commission by a recipient of such grants or payments which is required under such a program, including reports submitted by States receiving requirements payments under subpart 1 of part D of this subchapter, and each other report submitted to the Commission under this chapter.

(3) Information on the voluntary voting system guidelines adopted or modified by the Commission under subpart 3 of this part and information on the voluntary guidance adopted under part B of subchapter III.

(4) All votes taken by the Commission.

(5) Such other information and recommendations as the Commission considers appropriate.

(Pub. L. 107–252, title II, §207, Oct. 29, 2002, 116 Stat. 1677.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in pars. (1) and (2), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 107–252, Oct. 29, 2002, 116 Stat. 1666, known as the Help America Vote Act of 2002, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 15327 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dionics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of the undersigneds knowledge, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                     |                                      
|-------------------- | -------------------------------------
|Dated:  May 13, 2011 | By:   /s/ Bernard L. Kravitz         
|                     | Bernard L. Kravitz,                  
|                     | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                     | (Principal Executive Officer)        
|                     |                                      
|                     |                                      
|Dated:  May 13, 2011 | By:   /s/ Bernard L. Kravitz         
|                     | Bernard L. Kravitz,                  
|                     | Principal Financial Officer          

































1
§ 70.210 Respirable dust samples; transmission by operator. ( a ) If using a CMDPSU, the operator shall transmit within 24 hours after the end of the sampling shift all samples collected to fulfill the requirements of this part, including control filters, in containers provided by the manufacturer of the filter cassette to: Respirable Dust Processing Laboratory, Pittsburgh Safety and Health Technology Center, 626 Cochrans Mill Road, Building 38, Pittsburgh, PA 15236-3611, or to any other address designated by the District Manager.
( b ) The operator shall not open or tamper with the seal of any filter cassette or alter the weight of any filter cassette before or after it is used to fulfill the requirements of this part.
( c ) A person certified in sampling shall properly complete the dust data card that is provided by the manufacturer for each filter cassette. The card shall have an identification number identical to that on the cassette used to take the sample and be submitted to MSHA with the sample. Each card shall be signed by the certified person who actually performed the required examinations under 70.205(b) of this part during the sampling shift and shall include that person's MSHA Individual Identification Number (MIIN). Respirable dust samples with data cards not properly completed may be voided by MSHA.
( d ) All respirable dust samples collected by the operator shall be considered taken to fulfill the sampling requirements of part 70, 71, or 90 of this title, unless the sample has been identified in writing by the operator to the District Manager, prior to the intended sampling shift, as a sample to be used for purposes other than required by part 70, 71, or 90 of this title.
( e ) Respirable dust samples received by MSHA in excess of those required by this part shall be considered invalid samples.
( f ) If using a CPDM, the person certified in sampling shall ( 1 ) validate, certify, and transmit electronically to MSHA within 24 hours after the end of each sampling shift all sample data file information collected and stored in the CPDM, including the sampling status conditions encountered when sampling; and
( 2 ) not tamper with the CPDM or its components in any way before, during, or after it is used to fulfill the requirements of this part, or alter any sample data files. All CPDM data files transmitted electronically to MSHA shall be maintained by the operator for at least 12 months.
[79 FR 24974, May 1, 2014, as amended at 80 FR 52989, Sept. 2, 2015]
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Beicang Iron & Steel, Inc. ("the
      Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I,
      Beicang Hou, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
      Beicang Hou


Beicang
      Hou


Chief
      Executive Officer and


Chief
      Financial Officer





Dated:
      May 18, 2007