alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-13(C)(2), THE COMPANY HAS OMITTED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FROM
ITS FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS  ENDING MARCH 31, 1997.  SINCE THE  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS  HAVE BEEN  OMITTED,  THIS  FINANCIAL  DATA SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  ZEROS
INSTEAD OF THE APPROPRIATE  NUMBERS, AND SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS THE ACTUAL
FINANCIAL POSITION OF THE COMPANY.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
# C_2023279EN.01000401.xml

| 8.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11094 – CD&R / STONE POINT / FOCUS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 279/04)

On 14 June 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11094. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11094. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### WHITE v. LAWYERS’ SURETY CO. OF NEW YORK.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

June 22, 1903.)

1. Appeal—Orders Appealable.

Under Laws 1902, pp. 1562, 1563, 1578, c. 580, §§ 253-256, 310, regulating appeals from the Municipal Court, an order making a party defendant is not appealable, as it is not mentioned in such sections.

¶ 1. See Appeal and Error, vol. 2, Cent. Dig. § 651.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of. Manhattan, Sixth District.

Action by Juliet White against the Lawyers’ Surety Company of New York. From an order making another party defendant, plaintiff appeals. Dismissed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and GILDERSLEEVE and MacLEAN, JJ.

J. T. Williamson, for appellant.

L. E. Kuster, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is from an order making Oliver T. Sherwood a party defendant. The order was made on the application of Sherwood, and opposed by plaintiff. Appeals from the Municipal Court are regulated by sections 253-256, 310, Municipal Court Act (Laws 1902, pp. 1562, 1563, 1578, c. 580). In none of these sections is power given to appeal from an order of the character here presented. *248The power of the Supreme Court to entertain appeals from the Municipal Court is limited to the cases mentioned in the statute. Pascocello v. R. Co., 26 Misc. Rep. 412, 56 N. Y. Supp. 177.

As the order in question is not appealable, the appeal must be dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of RADA Electronic Industries Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Herzle Bodinger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Herzle Bodinger *
---------------------
Herzle Bodinger
Chief Executive Officer

March 29, 2007

     * The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at
the Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
```
#### ROBBINS *vs.*MENDENHALL.

[ACTION FOR BREACH OF SPECIAi CONTRACT.]

X. *Specification of causes of demurrer.*— A demurrer to a complaint, “ for the reason that the same does not, on its face, show any sufficient cause of aetion against the defendants,” is not a compliance with the requisition, of the statute, (Code, § 2253,) which requires a distinct specification of the causes of demurrer.

Appeal from the Oity Court of Mobile.

Tried before the Hon. Alex. McKinstry.

This action was brought by James Mendenhall, against Martin Bobbins, George Keyser, and John Hartnvell, to recover damages for the breach of a special contract, by which the defendants, “as trustees of the Jacksonville school district in Mobile county,” employed the plaintiff to take charge-of the school for a session of five months, *723commencing in September, 1857. The defendants demurred to the complaint, “for the reason that the same does not, on its face, show any sufficient cause of action against the defendants.” The court overruled the demurrer, and its action is here assigned as error.

Chamberlain & Hall, for appellants.

E. S. Dargan, and Jno. T. Taylor, *contra.*

STONE, J.

The only error assigned on this record, is the overruling of the defendants’ demurrer to the complaint. Looking into the demurrer, we find it does not specify any grounds of demurrer, within the spirit of the statute. — Code, § 2253; Burns v. Mayor of Mobile, 34 Ala. 485. The demurrer is but a general one, without specifying any grounds. We cannot consider this as a demurrer under our statute ; and the result is, that the assignment of error raises no question for our consideration.

Judgment affirmed.
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.300 Scope.

This subpart sets requirements for underground coal mine ventilation.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1


                          IMCLONE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                                 (IN THOUSANDS)

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                       YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                    -------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       2002         2001          2000          1999           1998
                                    ---------    ----------    ----------     ---------     ---------
                                                  RESTATED(1)   RESTATED(1)   RESTATED(1)   RESTATED(1)
                                                           (IN THOUSANDS)
<S>                                 <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Net loss .........................  $(157,949)    $(127,607)    $ (70,469)    $ (34,739)    $ (21,523)
Add:
  Fixed charges ..................     16,381        15,773        13,228           796           765
Less:
Capitalized interest .............      2,077         1,656           846           204            --
                                    ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------
Net loss, as adjusted ............  $(143,645)    $(113,490)    $ (58,087)    $ (34,147)    $ (20,758)
                                    =========     =========     =========     =========     =========
Fixed charges:
Interest (gross), including
  amortization of debt issuance
  costs ..........................     15,256        15,252        12,951           526           576
Portion of rent representative of
  the interest factor ............      1,125           521           277           270           189
                                    ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------
Fixed charges ....................  $  16,381     $  15,773     $  13,228     $     796     $     765
                                    =========     =========     =========     =========     =========
Deficiency of earnings available
  to cover fixed charges .........  $(160,026)    $(129,263)    $ (71,315)    $ (34,943)    $ (21,523)
                                    =========     =========     =========     =========     =========
</Table>

(1) As disclosed in Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere herein, we have restated our consolidated financial statements (a) to
recognize withholding tax liabilities, related withholding tax assets and
certain write-downs and (b) to recognize a tax liability and related expense
attributable to our non-compliance with the terms of our 1990 IDA Bonds.
§ 72.100 Periodic examinations. ( a ) Each operator of a coal mine shall provide to each miner periodic examinations including chest x-rays, spirometry, symptom assessment, and occupational history at a frequency specified in this section and at no cost to the miner. ( 1 ) Each operator shall use facilities approved by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) to provide examinations specified in paragraph (a) of this section.
( 2 ) The results of examinations or tests made pursuant to this section shall be furnished only to the Secretary, Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), and at the request of the miner, to the miner's designated physician.
( b ) *Voluntary examinations.* Each operator shall provide the opportunity to have the examinations specified in § 72.100(a) at least every 5 years to all miners employed at a coal mine. The examinations shall be available during a 6-month period that begins no less than 3.5 years and not more than 4.5 years from the end of the last 6-month period.
( c ) *Mandatory examinations.* For each miner who begins work at a coal mine for the first time, the operator shall provide examinations specified in § 72.100(a) as follows: ( 1 ) An initial examination no later than 30 days after beginning employment;
( 2 ) A follow-up examination no later than 3 years after the initial examination in paragraph (c)(1); and
( 3 ) A follow-up examination no later than 2 years after the examinations in paragraph (c)(2) if the chest x-ray shows evidence of pneumoconiosis or the spirometry examination indicates evidence of decreased lung function. For this purpose, evidential criteria will be defined by NIOSH.
( d ) Each mine operator shall develop and submit for approval to NIOSH a plan in accordance with 42 CFR part 37 for providing miners with the examinations specified in § 72.100(a) and a roster specifying the name and current address of each miner covered by the plan.
( e ) Each mine operator shall post on the mine bulletin board at all times the approved plan for providing the examinations specified in § 72.100(a).
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report of Constar International Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Hoffman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ MICHAEL J. HOFFMAN               
|Michael J. Hoffman                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer

May 15, 2008
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed December 28, 2015. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 15

- 01243

- CR
WILLIAM DAVID WALTON , Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee
On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F

- 1252565

- S


### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Lang

- Miers, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Schenck William David Walton was convicted, following th e adjudication of his guilt, of possession of methamphetamine in an amount of one gram or more but less than four grams. Appellant pleaded true to the allegations in the motion to adjudicate guilt as part of a plea agreement, which included a waiver of hi s right to appeal. See Blanco v. State , 18 S.W.3d 218,

219

– 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). The trial court followed the plea agreement and sentence d appellant to two years’ imprisonment. Because appellant waived his right to appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Do Not Publish T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47

151243F.U05 /David J. Schenck/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE– 2

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

WILLIAM DAVID WALTON, Appellant

No. 05

- 15

- 01243

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F12

- 52565

- S. Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck, Justices Bridges and Lang

- Miers participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of thi s date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Judgment entered this 28th day of December, 2015.
Exhibit 31-36**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, David E. Meador, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 of TheDetroit Edison Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b. Omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238, 33-8760, 34-47986 and 34-54942.  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.   /s/ DAVID E. MEADOR David E. Meador Dated: November 9, 2007 Executive Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer of The Detroit Edison Company
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.834 Training. In addition to existing part 48 task training, hazard training, training for qualified persons under existing § 75.153, and annual refresher training, the following specialized training shall be provided and specified in the part 48 plan: ( a ) Training for miners who perform maintenance on high-voltage continuous mining machines in high-voltage safety, testing, and repair and maintenance procedures.
( b ) Training for personnel who work in the vicinity of high-voltage continuous mining machines in safety procedures and precautions for moving the high-voltage machines or the trailing cables.
[75 FR 17549, Apr. 6, 2010]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The following schedule contains summarized financial information extracted
from the Questar Pipeline Company consolidated Statements of Income and Balance
Sheet for the period ended December 31, 1998, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such audited financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           9,990
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,304
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,203
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,211
<PP&E>                                         670,456
<DEPRECIATION>                                 215,589
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 557,296
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,047
<BONDS>                                        202,991
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,551
<OTHER-SE>                                     190,651
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   557,296
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               108,557
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,832
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,527
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,456
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 42,831
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,940
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,891
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,891
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### **CHAPTER 505—COMMERCIAL SPACE COMPETITIVENESS**

Sec.
50501.
Definitions.
50502.
Launch voucher demonstration program.
50503.
Anchor tenancy and termination liability.
50504.
Use of Government facilities.
50505.
Test facilities.
50506.
Commercial Space Achievement Award.