alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 77.704 Work on high-voltage lines; deenergizing and grounding.

High-voltage lines shall be deenergized and grounded before work is performed on them, except that repairs may be permitted on energized high-voltage lines if (a) such repairs are made by a qualified person in accordance with procedures and safeguards set forth in §§ 77.704-1 through 77.704-11 of this Subpart H as applicable, and (b) the operator has tested and properly maintained the protective devices necessary in making such repairs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                             5
<MULTIPLIER>                                       1000
<CURRENCY>                                          USD

<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                       1
<CASH>                                            3,254
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    24,013
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (981)
<INVENTORY>                                      37,014
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 68,533
<PP&E>                                           34,595
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (22,091)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   95,442
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            17,949
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                            329
<OTHER-SE>                                       58,196
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     95,442
<SALES>                                          33,842
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 33,842
<CGS>                                            19,507
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    32,158
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    323
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  271
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1,090
<INCOME-TAX>                                        412
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 678
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                        678
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.10



</TABLE>
#### MEURER v. BERLIN.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

February 11, 1903.)

1. Default Judgment — Vacation—Identity of Defendant — Indem Sonans.

A default judgment entered against “Zachariah” B., the name Zachariah having been alleged by plaintiff to be fictitious and defendant’s Ohristian name unknown, will not be vacated on motion of “Zax” B., for failure to serve summons, no effort having been made to enforce it against Zax.

Appeal from municipal court.

, Action by Jacob Meurer, doing business as Meurer Bros. & Co., against Zachariah K. Berlin. From an order refusing to vacate a default judgment, Zax K. Berlin appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before GOODRICH, P. J., and BARTLETT, JENKS, WOODWARD, and HIRSCHBERG, JJ.

Joseph Rosenzweig, for appellant.

Frank L. Entwisle, for respondent.

JENKS, J.

The plaintiff brought action upon a promissory note against Sam Bardler and Zachariah K. Berlin, “the name Zachariah being fictitious, real first name being unknown to plaintiff.” The plaintiff did not summon Bardler, but obtained a judgment against Berlin by default. Thereafter Zax K. Berlin moved the court for vacation and cancellation of the judgment, upon his affidavit “that he was the defendant above named, that judgment was rendered against him as by a default, that he was never served with a summons herein or authorized any one to appear for him.” The court denied the motion upon the ground, inter alla, that it did not appear to its satisfaction that the applicant was the defendant in the action. I think that the order may be affirmed upon this ground. It does not appear that there was any judgment entered against Zax K. Berlin. The judgment is against a Berlin named as Zachariah, which name is fictitious. It does not appear that the plaintiff has moved in any way to enforce his judgment against the affiant Zax K. Berlin. A judgment against Zachariah (fictitious) or against Zachariah would not warrant proceedings against the property of Zax. Farnham v. Hildreth, 32 Barb. 277. On the other hand, if the plaintiff really aimed his suit against the affiant, and hereafter seeks, under section 1251 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to amend the judgment, it must be upon such notice as the court may direct. An objection based upon the nonservice of the summons is not based upon an *241irregularity, but strike's at the validity of the judgment, and may be heard at any time. Julian v. Woolsey, 87 Hun, 326, 34 N. Y. Supp. 321, affirmed 147 N. Y. 722, 42 N. E. 723.

Order of the municipal court affirmed, without costs. All concur*
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofSEDONA Corporation (“SEDONA”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, David R. Vey, Chairman of the Board of Directors and ChiefExecutive Officer of SEDONA Corporation certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of SEDONA Corporation.

 

 
| Dated: April 15, 2010 | /s/ DAVID R. VEY                                    |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                  | David R. Vey                                        |
|                  | *Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer* |
|                  | *(Principal Executive Officer)*                     |

 

----
#### § 77.702 Protection other than grounding.

Methods other than grounding which provide no less effective protection may be permitted by the Secretary or his authorized representative. Such methods may not be used unless so approved.
#### § 77.902 Low- and medium-voltage ground check monitor circuits.

On and after September 30, 1971, three-phase low- and medium-voltage resistance grounded systems to portable and mobile equipment shall include a fail safe ground check circuit or other no less effective device approved by the Secretary to monitor continuously the grounding circuit to assure continuity. The fail safe ground check circuit shall cause the circuit breaker to open when either the ground or pilot check wire is broken. Cable couplers shall be constructed to cause the ground check continuity conductor to break first and the ground conductor last when being uncoupled when pilot check circuits are used.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 5, 2018

a0226 

# Order

Clerk March 5, 2018

155552

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 155552

COA: 335437

Macomb CC: 2001

- 000827

- FC

PHILLIP JERRY POWELL, JR.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 23, 2017

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED , because the defendant’s

motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
### §3035. Central Intelligence Agency

#### (a) Central Intelligence Agency

There is a Central Intelligence Agency.

#### (b) Function

The function of the Central Intelligence Agency is to assist the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency in carrying out the responsibilities specified in section 3036(c) of this title.

(July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title I, §104, as added Pub. L. 108–458, title I, §1011(a), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3660.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 403–4 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 104 of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title I, as added Pub. L. 102–496, title VII, §705(a)(3), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3192; amended Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title XV, §1502(f)(5), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 510; Pub. L. 104–293, title VIII, §807(b), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3480; Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title X, §1067(16), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 775; Pub. L. 106–567, title I, §105, Dec. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 2834; Pub. L. 107–306, title III, §§321, 353(b)(1)(A), (4), Nov. 27, 2002, 116 Stat. 2391, 2402, related to authorities of Director of Central Intelligence, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 108–458, title I, §§1011(a), 1097(a), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3643, 3698, effective not later than six months after Dec. 17, 2004, except as otherwise expressly provided. See sections 3024 and 3036 of this title.

Another prior section 104 of act July 26, 1947, was renumbered section 108 and is classified to section 3043 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

For Determination by President that section take effect on Apr. 21, 2005, see Memorandum of President of the United States, Apr. 21, 2005, 70 F.R. 23925, set out as a note under section 3001 of this title.

Section effective not later than six months after Dec. 17, 2004, except as otherwise expressly provided, see section 1097(a) of Pub. L. 108–458, set out in an Effective Date of 2004 Amendment; Transition Provisions note under section 3001 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Communication of Restricted Data

Authorization for the communication of Restricted Data by the Central Intelligence Agency, see Ex. Ord. No. 10899, eff. Dec. 9, 1960, 25 F.R. 12729, set out as a note under section 2162 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., D/B/A REPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL 

AND SCOT SPENCER 

AIRLIFT GROUP, INC. 

AND RICHARD BERNARD 

Unauthorized Air Transportation, Unfair and Deceptive 

Practices and Unfair Metliods of Competition, and 

Violations of Public Charter Rules 

EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of 

Competition, and Violations of Public Charter Rules 

Enforcement Proceeding 

DOT-OST-1995-272 

formerly 

Docket 49233 

STATUS REPORT 

The Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and 

Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22, 2006, Order 

staying this proceeding, files this report detailing the current status of this proceeding and 

settlement negotiations. 

The Department has not ruled on the outstanding motions filed by Respondents 

and opposed by the Enforcement Office in Ascend Aviation Group, Docket OST-2004-

17486. 
There have been no further settlement discussions. 

Date: February 26, 2010. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Samuel Podberesky 

Assistant General Counsel for 

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

Dayton Lehman, Jr. 

Deputy Assistant General Counsel for 

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

William J. Wagne, 

Senior Trial Attorney 

United States Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Room 96-429 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: 202-366-9342 

FAX: 202-366-7152 
w 

Docket No. DOT-GST-1995-272 

I hereby certify that on this 26th day of February, 2010, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Status Report was served in the following manner to the following: 

Original 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

By Personal Service 

The Honorable Ronnie A Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

East Building Ground Floor 

Room El2-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: (202) 366-2142 

FAX: (202) 366-7536 

By First Class Mail 

Ascend Aviation Group, LLC 

Ascend Aviation Marketing and Sales, LLC 

KCP Leasing and Services, LLC 

Scot Spencer 

C/O George Spencer 

24 Eton Court 

Bedminster, NJ 07921 

laLS^
----

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  August 1, 2013 | /s/ John M. Lowber     |
|---------------------------------|------------------------|
|                            | John M. Lowber         |
|                            | Treasurer and Director |
|                            | GCI, Inc.              |

----
# Fourth Court of Ap peals

San Antonio, Texas

September 3, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00477

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF CHARLES INNESS THRASH

From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- PC

- 2912

Honorable Oscar J. Kazen, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s motion for leave to file an amended notice of appeal is granted.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of September, 2019

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

, Clerk of Court
<Page>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption
"Experts-Independent Auditors" and to the use of our report dated November 21,
2002 in the Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement (Form S-6 No.
333-101066) and related Prospectus of Claymore Securities Defined Portfolios,
Series 140.

                                                      /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
                                                          GRANT THORNTON LLP

Chicago, Illinois
November 21, 2002
§ 57.9100 Traffic control. To provide for the safe movement of self-propelled mobile equipment— ( a ) Rules governing speed, right-of-way, direction of movement, and the use of headlights to assure appropriate visibility, shall be established and followed at each mine; and
( b ) Signs or signals that warn of hazardous conditions shall be placed at appropriate locations at each mine.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE LIFECORE
BIOMEDICAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         702,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,655,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   403,000
<INVENTORY>                                 23,652,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,170,000
<PP&E>                                      42,245,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,377,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              67,871,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,756,000
<BONDS>                                      6,517,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       126,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  56,472,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                67,871,000
<SALES>                                     23,872,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,872,000
<CGS>                                       12,059,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               23,660,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                42,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             658,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (425,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (425,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (425,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)


</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Railroad retirement andunemployment insurance systems handbook (Informational conference ed.)**
 
2017
 
SuDoc Number:RR1.62:IN 3/
Item Number:0859-A (online)
CGP systemNumber:001049899
 
April 3, 2018
#### § 77.1705 First aid training program; retraining of supervisory employees; availability to all miners.

Beginning January 1, 1972, each operator of a surface coal mine shall conduct refresher first aid training programs each calendar year for all selected supervisory employees and make available refresher first aid training courses to all miners employed in the mine.

[36 FR 9364, May 22, 1971, as amended at 36 FR 13143, July 15, 1971]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn analysis of landing rates and separations at the Dallas/Fort Worth International AirportAdvanced air traffic management systems such as the Center/TRACON Automation System (CTAS) should yield a wide range of benefits, including reduced aircraft delays and controller workload. To determine the traffic-flow benefits achievable from future terminal airspace automation, live radar information was used to perform an analysis of current aircraft landing rates and separations at the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport. Separation statistics that result when controllers balance complex control procedural constraints in order to maintain high landing rates are presented. In addition, the analysis estimates the potential for airport capacity improvements by determining the unused landing opportunities that occur during rush traffic periods. Results suggest a large potential for improving the accuracy and consistency of spacing between arrivals on final approach, and they support earlier simulation findings that improved air traffic management would increase capacity and reduce delays.Document ID19960041235Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBallin, Mark G.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field,CA United States)*Erzberger, Heinz*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field,CA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1996Subject CategoryAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberA-961649NASA-TM-110397NAS 1.15:110397Accession Number96N31262Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-64-13Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19960041235.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024