alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3735. Limitation on availability of funds for Cooperative Threat Reduction activities in People's Republic of China

#### (a) Semiannual installments

In carrying out activities under the Program in the People's Republic of China, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for such activities are obligated in semiannual installments.

#### (b) Required reports

#### (1) Additional information

With respect to carrying out activities under the Program in the People's Republic of China, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees the reports required by section 3711(g) of this title on a semiannual basis by not later than 15 days before any obligation of Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for such activities during the covered semiannual period. In addition to the matters required by such section, each such report shall include, in coordination with the Secretary of State—

(A) whether China has taken material steps to—

(i) disrupt the proliferation activities of Li Fangwei (also known as Karl Lee, or any other alias known by the United States); and

(ii) arrest Li Fangwei pursuant the indictment charged in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on April 29, 2014;

(B) whether China has proliferated to any non-nuclear weapons state, or any nuclear weapons state in violation of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, any item that contributes to a ballistic missile or nuclear weapons delivery system; and

(C) the number, type, and summary of any demarches between the United States and China with respect to the matters described in subparagraphs (A) and (B).

#### (2) Additional submissions

At the same time as the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees the information described in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of paragraph (1) as part of the reports required by section 3711(g) of this title, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate such information.

#### (3) Coverage

With respect to the information described in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of paragraph (1)—

(A) the first report described in such paragraph that is submitted after December 23, 2016, shall cover the preceding 12-month period before the date of such submission; and

(B) each subsequent report shall cover the semiannual period preceding the date of such submission.

#### (4) Form

The information described in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

(Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title XIII, §1335, as added Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XIII, §1303(a), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2567; amended Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title XIII, §1302(b)(3), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1705.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2017—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–91 struck out "or expended" after "obligated".
#### § 77.1000 Highwalls, pits and spoil banks; plans.

Each operator shall establish and follow a ground control plan for the safe control of all highwalls, pits and spoil banks to be developed after June 30, 1971, which shall be consistent with prudent engineering design and will insure safe working conditions. The mining methods employed by the operator shall be selected to insure highwall and spoil bank stability.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Constar International Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James C. Cook, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ James C. Cook                                   
|James C. Cook                                       
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                    
|May 4, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DRAVO
CORPORATION'S SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             885
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    26578
<ALLOWANCES>                                       143
<INVENTORY>                                      15214
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 42820
<PP&E>                                          241245
<DEPRECIATION>                                  117243
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  223815
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            35406
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         15081
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            20000
<PREFERRED>                                         25
<OTHER-SE>                                       73463
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    223815
<SALES>                                         118325
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                118325
<CGS>                                            88707
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    88707
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                4911
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  10506
<INCOME-TAX>                                       316
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              10190
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     10190
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Annual Report of Levon Resources Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Ron Tremblay, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

|   | (1)    | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

|                |   |                        |   |
|---------------------|--------|-----------------------------|--------|
| Date: June 25, 2015 | By:    | */s/ Ron Tremblay*          |   |
|                |   | Ron Tremblay                |   |
|                |   | Principal Executive Officer |   |

  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the annual report or as a separate disclosure document.
**EXHIBIT32**

 

**STATEMENTPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS REQUIRED BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of John Deere Capital Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending April 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned herebycertify that to the best of our knowledge:

 
| 1.     |   | The Report fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                      |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| 2.     |   | The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 
| June 1, 2009 |   | */s/ R. W. Lane*           |   | Chairman  and Principal Executive Officer              |
|-------------------|--------|----------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|              |   | R. W. Lane                 |   |                                                   |
|              |   |                       |   |                                                   |
|              |   |                       |   |                                                   |
| June 1, 2009 |   | */s/ M. J. Mack, Jr.* |   | Senior  Vice President and Principal Financial Officer |
|              |   | M. J. Mack, Jr.       |   |                                                   |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to John Deere Capital Corporation and will be retained by John DeereCapital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

----
§ 254.47 Determining the volume of oil of your worst case discharge scenario. You must calculate the volume of oil of your worst case discharge scenario as follows: ( a ) For an oil production platform facility, the size of your worst case discharge scenario is the sum of the following: ( 1 ) The maximum capacity of all oil storage tanks and flow lines on the facility. Flow line volume may be estimated; and
( 2 ) The volume of oil calculated to leak from a break in any pipelines connected to the facility considering shutdown time, the effect of hydrostatic pressure, gravity, frictional wall forces and other factors; and
( 3 ) The daily production volume from an uncontrolled blowout of the highest capacity well associated with the facility. In determining the daily discharge rate, you must consider reservoir characteristics, casing/production tubing sizes, and historical production and reservoir pressure data. Your scenario must discuss how to respond to this well flowing for 30 days as required by § 254.26(d)(1).
( b ) For exploratory or development drilling operations, the size of your worst case discharge scenario is the daily volume possible from an uncontrolled blowout. In determining the daily discharge rate, you must consider any known reservoir characteristics. If reservoir characteristics are unknown, you must consider the characteristics of any analog reservoirs from the area and give an explanation for the selection of the reservoir(s) used. Your scenario must discuss how to respond to this well flowing for 30 days as required by § 254.26(d)(1).
( c ) For a pipeline facility, the size of your worst case discharge scenario is the volume possible from a pipeline break. You must calculate this volume as follows: ( 1 ) Add the pipeline system leak detection time to the shutdown response time.
( 2 ) Multiply the time calculated in paragraph (c)(1) of this section by the highest measured oil flow rate over the preceding 12-month period. For new pipelines, you should use the predicted oil flow rate in the calculation.
( 3 ) Add to the volume calculated in paragraph (c)(2) of this section the total volume of oil that would leak from the pipeline after it is shut in. Calculate this volume by taking into account the effects of hydrostatic pressure, gravity, frictional wall forces, length of pipeline segment, tie-ins with other pipelines, and other factors.
( d ) If your facility which stores, handles, transfers, processes, or transports oil does not fall into the categories listed in paragraph (a), (b), or (c) of this section, contact the Chief, OSPD for instructions on the calculation of the volume of your worst case discharge scenario.
[76 FR 64462, Oct. 18, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 36153, June 6, 2016]
#### Herman A. Larson, appellee, v. Charles E. Doerr, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,312.

Action to recover damages sustained through negligence of defendant in driving his automobile against plaintiff’s and demolishing it. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Francis BorreUi, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 29, 1925.

Garrett, McKenna & Harris, for appellant.

Alden, Latham & Young, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice O ’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-08-31T11:37:47-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
FREMONT

CARBON

SWEETWATER

ALBANY

NATRONA

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

CONVERSE

CROOK

UINTA

LARAMIE

WESTON

PLATTE

GOSHEN

NIOBRARA

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

Bridger-Teton

Thunder

Basin

Medicine-Bow

Medicine-Bow

Rawlins

Casper

Rock Springs

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Yellowstone Newcastle

National Park

Lusk

Yoder

Hanna

Baggs

Afton

Hulett

Glendo

Casper

Douglas

Bairoil

Rawlins

Laramie

Superior

Sundance

Saratoga

La Barge Guernsey

Pinedale

Kemmerer

Evanston

Cheyenne

Wheatland

Wamsutter

Cokeville

Chugwater

Big Piney

Newcastle

Torrington

Rock River

Pine Bluffs

Green River

Medicine Bow

Fort Laramie

Elk Mountain

Rock Springs

Grand Encampment

0 25 50 100

Miles

0 25 50 100

Kilometers

Wyoming Sage-Grouse

Land Use Plan Amendments

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

LUP Amendments Planning Area

BLM Field Office Boundary

Forest Service Planning Unit Boundary

Closed to Mineral Materials

BLM and USFS Surface Lands

Sage-grouse Priority/Core Habitat Areas

Sage-grouse Connectivity Habitat Areas

Counties

Water

Interstate

State / US Hwy

Cities

Map 2-16: Alternative C

Areas Closed to Mineral Materials
**EXHIBIT
32.1**
  **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of IMCOR Pharmaceutical Co. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Taffy J. Williams,
Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      company.  /s/ Taffy J. WilliamsTaffy J. Williams, Ph.D.Chief
      Executive OfficerDate:
      March 29, 2005
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

December 22, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00641

- CV
IN THE ESTATE OF JACK C. GILBERT, JR., DECEASED
, From the County Court at Law, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16

- 048

- PR Honorable Stephe n B. Ables, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R
Appellant Trudy Jane Schuetze Sundin fi led her brief on November 2 , 201 6

. Appellee filed his brief on November 18, 2016 . On December 7, 2016, Appellant filed a reply brief , a motion for leave to file an amended brief, and the amended brief. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.7; 4 TH T EX

. A PP

. (S AN A NTONIO ) L OC

. R. 8.4 (noting an amended brief “completely replaces the original brief”). In her opposed motion for leave to the file an amen ded brief, Appellant notes she presents no new arguments in her amended brief , she “has simply added a single sentence to the prayer of [the original] brief to request the alternative relief of remand.” This court may permit a party to amend its brief. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38. 7 ; ERC Midstream LLC v. Am. Midstream Partners, LP , 497 S.W.3d 99, 108 n.2 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 2016, no pet.)

. Because Appellant’s amended brief does not present any new argument, we GRANT Appellant’s motion for leave to file the amended brief. See ERC Midstream LLC , 497 S.W.3d at 108 n.2. Appellant’s amended brief is deemed timely filed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.7; 4 TH T EX

. A PP

. (S AN A NTONIO ) L OC

. R. 8.4.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my h and and affixed the seal of the said court on this 22nd day of December, 2 016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6031

WILLIAM H. BRANCH, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DIRECTOR OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief

District Judge. (CA-02-1642-AM)

Submitted: April 17, 2003 Decided: April 22, 2003

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William H. Branch, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

William H. Branch, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000). This Court may only grant a certificate of appealability

if the appellant makes a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). When, as

here, a district court dismisses a habeas petition on procedural

grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the

petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would

find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the

denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason

would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in

its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.)

(quoting Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert.

denied, 534 U.S. 941 (2001). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude Branch

has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 123 S. Ct. 1029

(2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
|   |   |   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|

**UNITED STATES**

**SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**

**Washington, D.C. 20549**

**FORM 10-Q**

 

**(Mark One)**

 

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from           to

Commission File No. 0-15279

 

|   | **GENERAL COMMUNICATION, INC.**                        |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |   |

 

|   | **State of Alaska**             |   | **92-0072737**      |   |
|--------|---------------------------------|--------|---------------------|--------|
|   | (State or other Jurisdiction of |   | (I.R.S Employer     |   |
|   | Incorporation or organization)  |   | Identification No.) |   |

 

|   |                                     | **2550 Denali Street** |       |      |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------|------------------------|------------|-----------|--------|
|   |                                     | **Suite 1000**         |       |      |   |
|   |                                     | **Anchorage, Alaska**  |       | **99503** |   |
|   | (Address of Principal Executive offices) |                   | (Zip Code) |      |
|        |                                          |                        |            |           |        |  |

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: **(907) 868-5600**

 

Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.  See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

| Large accelerated filer o                                             | Accelerated filer x         |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
| Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o No x

 

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's classes of common stock as of April 30, 2008 was:

49,915,000 shares of Class A common stock; and

3,255,619 shares of Class B common stock.

 

 

|   | 1 |
|--------|---|

 

----
C. A. No. 77-104.

#### Stephen K. Harrison *v.*William E. Laurie *et al.*

*William F. Reilly,*Public Defender, *Barbara Hurst, John A. MacFadyen III,*Asst. Public Defenders, for petitioner.

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, for respondent.

Petition for habeas corpus is denied as moot.