alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# FORM 6-K

# SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549

# REPORT OF FOREIGN ISSUERPURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the month
  of December 2004

MULTICANAL
  S.A.  
  (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

MULTICHANNEL
  S.A.. 
  (Translation of Registrants Name Into English)

Avalos 2057
  (1431) Buenos Aires, Argentina 
  (Address of principal executive offices)

> Indicate by check
>         mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover
>         of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
>       Form
>         20-F x                          Form
>         40-F
>       Indicate by check mark
>         whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this
>         Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant
>         to Rule 12g-3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
>       Yes
>                                                 No  x
>       If "Yes"
>         is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
>         connection with Rule 12g3-2(b):

82 -

---



---

Buenos Aires, December 15, 2004



Messrs.

Buenos Aires Stock Exchange

___________________________



Reference:MULTICANAL S.A.

Acuerdo Preventivo Extrajudicial (APE) Proceeding

---





Dear Sirs,



Martín G. Ríos, in my capacity as Person in Charge of Market Relations on behalf of Multicanal S.A. (the Company), proof of such representation
  previously filed, with a registered domicile established at Avenida Juana Manso 205, 1stFloor, Federal Capital City, Fax 4021-7777, addresses this letter to the Exchange to notify you that the Company was notified today of the decision rendered by the Court of Commercial Appeals, Chamber A, dismissing the extraordinary appeal filed against the decision of that Court affirming the decision confirming the Companys APE.

Yours sincerely,



|Martin G. Ríos
|--------------







---

# SIGNATURE

Pursuant
 to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report
 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

|Date: December 17, 2004 | MULTICANAL S.A.
      By:  /s/ Adrian Meszaros
               Adrian Meszaros
                Chief Financial Officer
|----------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
§ 586.213 Is an Alternate Use RUE assignable? ( a ) BOEM may authorize assignment of an Alternate Use RUE.
( b ) To request assignment of an Alternate Use RUE, you must submit a written request for assignment that includes the following information: ( 1 ) BOEM-assigned Alternate Use RUE number;
( 2 ) The names of both the assignor and the assignee, if applicable;
( 3 ) The names and telephone numbers of the contacts for both the assignor and the assignee;
( 4 ) The names, titles, and signatures of the authorizing officials for both the assignor and the assignee;
( 5 ) A statement affirming that the owner of the existing OCS facility and lessee of the lease in which the facility is located approve of the proposed assignment and assignee;
( 6 ) A statement that the assignee agrees to comply with and to be bound by the terms and conditions of the Alternate Use RUE;
( 7 ) Evidence required by § 586.108 that the assignee satisfies the requirements of § 586.107; and
( 8 ) A statement on how the assignee will comply with the financial assurance requirements set forth in the Alternate Use RUE.
( c ) The assignment takes effect on the date we approve your request.
( d ) The assignor is liable for all obligations that accrue under an Alternate Use RUE before the date we approve your assignment request. An assignment approval by BOEM does not relieve the assignor of liability for accrued obligations that the assignee, or a subsequent assignee, fails to perform.
( e ) The assignee and each subsequent assignee are liable for all obligations that accrue under an Alternate Use RUE after the date we approve the assignment request.
Editorial Note on Part 779
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54948, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 779 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93327, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 779.19 Vegetation information. ( a ) The permit application shall, if required by the regulatory authority, contain a map that delineates existing vegetative types and a description of the plant communities within the proposed permit area and within any proposed reference area. This description shall include information adequate to predict the potential for reestablishing vegetation.
( b ) When a map or aerial photograph is required, sufficient adjacent areas shall be included to allow evaluation of vegetation as important habitat for fish and wildlife for those species of fish and wildlife identified under 30 CFR 780.16.
[44 FR 15354, Mar. 13, 1979, as amended at 52 FR 47359, Dec. 11, 1987; 81 FR 93327, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54948, Nov. 17, 2017]
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3

                    CONSULTING AND ADMINISTRATIVE AGREEMENT

     This Consulting and Administrative Agreement ( the "Agreement") is made and
entered into effective as of July __, 1998, by and between North American Gaming
and Entertainment Corporation ("Consultant") and River Port Truck Stop, L.L.C.
(the "Company").

     Consultant and the Company hereby incorporate by reference into this
Agreement that certain Consulting and Administrative Agreement (the "OM
Consulting Agreement") entered into effective as of April 15, 1998 by and
between Consultant and OM Operating, L.L.C. ("OM") and hereby agree that
Consultant shall perform the same services for the Company related to its truck
stop video poker casino as Consultant is performing for OM under the OM
Operating Agreement, and that the Consultant and the Company shall have the same
rights, duties, responsibilities and obligations to each other as the Consultant
and OM have to each other under the OM Operating Agreement as fully as if the
full OM Operating Agreement were restated herein and executed by Consultant as
the "Consultant" thereunder and by the Company as the "Company" thereunder,
except that the fee payable by the Company to Consultant under this Agreement
shall be an annual fee of $50,000 per year for as long as the Company is
constructing, or owns or operates, its truck stop video poker casino.  Without
limiting the foregoing, Consultant and the Company hereby agree that the term of
this Agreement shall be the same term as set forth in the OM Operating
Agreement.

     Executed effective as of the date and year first above written.

                                    RIVER PORT TRUCK STOP, L.L.C.


                                    By:
                                       ---------------------------------
                                           George J. Akmon, Manager

                                    NORTH AMERICAN GAMING AND
                                    ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION


                                    By:
                                       ---------------------------------
                                    Its:
                                        --------------------------------

                                      -1-
#### In the Matter of D. S. S. on Behalf of Julia Radoslovich, Appellant, v Dominick J. Radoslovich, Respondent.

Appeal by petitioner wife from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated August 8, 1978, which permitted certain visitation to the respondent without first holding a full hearing. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Petitioner, if she be so advised, should proceed by proper petition for any change in visitation she desires, at which time a full hearing may be held and the court can then consider the taking of psychiatric testimony and the appointment of a Law Guardian for the children of the parties. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Rabin and Margett, JJ., concur.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Implementation of federal prizeauthority.**
 
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016
 
SuDoc Number:PREX 23.2:P 93/
Item Number:0857-P-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001050232
 
March 20, 2018
#### RAYMOND v. PENNSYLVANIA R. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 24, 1905.)

Action by Edward A. Raymond against the Pennsylvania Railroad Company. No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs.
§ 735.11 Eligibility for program development grants. ( a ) *Designation of State agency.* In order to receive a program development grant the Governor of a State shall designate in writing to the Director one agency to submit the grant applications, and to receive and administer the grants.
( b ) *Periods covered by program development grants.* ( 1 ) An agency may apply for a program development grant for any period for which it does not have an approved State program. This is limited to periods during— ( i ) The initial development of a State program;
( ii ) The revision of a State program which has been disapproved by the Secretary; and
( iii ) The revision of a State program from which the Secretary has withdrawn his approval.
( 2 ) The Director shall limit grants for (b)(1) (ii) and (iii) of this paragraph to the costs of making revisions necessary to secure approval of the State programs.
( 3 ) The Director shall not approve grants for costs incurred prior to August 3, 1977.
(Secs. 201, 501, 503, 705, Pub. L. 95-87, 91 Stat. 450, 467, 470, 520, (30 U.S.C. 1211, 1251, 1253, 1295))
[42 FR 62706, Dec. 13, 1977; 43 FR 2722, Jan. 19, 1977. Redesignated at 44 FR 15312, Mar. 13, 1979, and amended at 45 FR 2804, Jan. 14, 1980]
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.11


                        Amendment to Employment Agreement

Effective as of August 20, 2001, that certain Employment Agreement entered into
by and between The viaLink Company (the "Company") and Robert I. Noe (the
"Employee") made and entered into effective as of April 8, 1999, as previously
amended (the "Employment Agreement"), is hereby further amended as follows:

1.       The current base salary of the Employee is hereby reduced by $5,000 so
         that Employee's base rate of compensation is now $$7,740.38 per pay
         period, or $201,249.88 per annum.

2.       In consideration for Employee's entering into this Amendment to the
         Employment Agreement, the Company's Board of Directors grants the
         Employee an option to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock of The
         viaLink Company pursuant to the Company's current Employee Stock Option
         Plan.

3.       Unless modified herein, the terms and conditions of the Employment
         Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby,
have executed this Addendum to Employment Agreement effective as of the date
first above written.

The viaLink Company                              Employee


By: /s/ William P. Creasman                      /s/ Robert I. Noe
                                                 -----------------
                                                 (Signature)

Title: Vice President                            Robert I. Noe
                                                 (Print Name)
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Dieter K. Dankerl, Deceased. Hans Dankerl, as Attorney in Fact of Hans Dankerl and Another, Appellant; Eugene P. Devine, as Public Administrator of Albany County, Respondent. *679(Two Proceedings.)

Appeals from two orders of Surrogate’s Court, Albany County. Decedent died a resident of Albany County and a citizen of West Germany and the Surrogate has issued limited letters of administration to the Public Administrator. Decedent is survived by a mother and father residing in West Germany and who are citizens of that country, and by the petitioner, who is a brother and a resident of Albany County. Petitioner has no personal interest in the estate; the parents in West Germany are the sole distributees. In the first petition to the Surrogate petitioner asked that ancillary letters be granted him. This was denied on the ground that the decedent was a resident of Albany County and since primary letters had not been issued elsewhere there is no authority to issue ancillary letters (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 100; 5 Warren’s Heaton, Surrogates’ Courts § 456, pp. 75, 76). In *Matter of Taormina*(2 A D 2d 711, affd. 2 N Y 2d 878) the decedent was a nonresident. After denial of this application, petitioner made a second application for the issuance of letters of administration to himself as attorney in fact of the parents. Petitioner could not himself qualify since, as it has been seen, he has no personal interest in the estate (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 118). But the parents are incompetent to receive letters since they are nonresident aliens (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 94, subd. 3); nor can they designate an attorney to receive the letters for them *(Matter of Mora,*133 Misc. 254; 2 Jessup Redfield, Surrogates Law and Practice, § 1360, p. 606). Orders unanimously affirmed, without costs.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lifecore Biomedical, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, David M. Noel, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ David M. Noel
------------------
David M. Noel
Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial and accounting officer)

February 9, 2005
§ 583.350 When can an agreement be terminated? ( a ) The Director will terminate any agreement issued under this part upon proof that it was obtained by fraud or misrepresentation, after notice and an opportunity to be heard has been afforded to the parties of the agreement.
( b ) The Director may immediately suspend and subsequently terminate any agreement issued under this part when: ( 1 ) There is noncompliance with the agreement, pursuant to § 583.330 (a); or
( 2 ) It is necessary for reasons of national security or defense; or
( 3 ) The Director determines that: ( i ) Continued activity under the agreement would cause serious harm or damage to natural resources; life (including human and wildlife); property; the marine, coastal, or human environment; or sites, structures, or objects of historical or archaeological significance;
( ii ) The threat of harm or damage will not disappear or decrease to an acceptable extent within a reasonable period of time; and
( iii ) The advantages of termination outweigh the advantages of continuing the agreement.
( c ) The Director will immediately notify the parties to the agreement of the suspension or termination. The Director will also mail a letter to the parties to the agreement at their record post office address with notice of any suspension or termination and the cause for such action.
( d ) In the event that BOEM terminates an agreement under this section, none of the parties to the agreement will be entitled to compensation as a result of expenses or lost revenues that may result from the termination.
§ 845.17 Procedures for assessment of civil penalties. ( a ) Within 15 days of service of a notice or order, the person to whom it was issued may submit written information about the violation to the Office and to the inspector who issued the notice of violation or cessation order. The Office shall consider any information so submitted in determining the facts surrounding the violation and the amount of the penalty.
( b ) The Office shall serve a copy of the proposed assessment and of the work sheet showing the computation of the proposed assessment on the person to whom the notice or order was issued, by certified mail, or by any alternative means consistent with the rules governing service of a summons or complaint under rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, within 30 days of the issuance of the notice or order. ( 1 ) If a copy of the proposed assessment and work sheet or the certified mail is tendered at the address of that person required under 30 CFR 816.11, or at any address at which that person is in fact located, and he or she refuses to accept delivery of or to collect such documents, the requirements of this paragraph shall be deemed to have been complied with upon such tender.
( 2 ) Failure by the Office to serve any proposed assessment within 30 days shall not be grounds for dismissal of all or part of such assessment unless the person against whom the proposed penalty has been assessed— ( i ) Proves actual prejudice as a result of the delay; and,
( ii ) Makes a timely objection to the delay. An objection shall be timely only if made in the normal course of administrative review.
( c ) Unless a conference has been requested, the Office shall review and reassess any penalty if necessary to consider facts which were not reasonably available on the date of issuance of the proposed assessment because of the length of the abatement period. The Office shall serve a copy of any such reassessment and of the worksheet showing the computation of the reassessment in the manner provided in paragraph (b), within 30 days after the date the violation is abated.
[47 FR 35640, Aug. 16, 1982, as amended at 56 FR 28446, June 20, 1991]
**EXHIBIT      32**

**Certificate      Of Chief Executive Officer And Acting Chief Financial      Officer**

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.      1350)**

|   | 1. | The                    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                    or 15(d) of                    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                    and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                    respects, the financial results of operations of the                    Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                             |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/                       Michael A. Grollman                                                                                                               |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                  |   |   |        |
| Michael                        A. GrollmanChairman,                          Chief Executive Officer,and                          Acting Chief Financial Officer |   |   |   |
### §404n–1. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 404n–1, comprising section 341 of the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003, Pub. L. 107–306, was editorially reclassified as section 3362 of this title.
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.1715 Identification check system.

[Statutory Provisions]

Each operator of a coal mine shall establish a check-in and check-out system which will provide positive identification of every person underground, and will provide an accurate record of the persons in the mine kept on the surface in a place chosen to minimize the danger of destruction by fire or other hazard. Such record shall bear a number identical to an identification check that is securely fastened to the lamp belt worn by the person underground. The identification check shall be made of a rust resistant metal of not less than 16 gauge.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND
THE CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,350
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,122
<INVENTORY>                                      1,384
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,532
<PP&E>                                         916,080
<DEPRECIATION>                                 497,752
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 496,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           95,539
<BONDS>                                         86,326
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       118,442
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,129
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   496,768
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               223,331
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  153,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,327
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 64,047
<INCOME-TAX>                                    26,067
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,980
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,980
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>