alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John Kehoe, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of MS Structured Asset Corp.
on behalf of SATURNS Trust No. 2002-10;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;
and

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and
the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based
upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trustee
have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: LaSalle Bank National
Association and its officers and agents.



                                                   By: /s/ John Kehoe
                                                      ----------------------
                                                   Name:  John Kehoe
                                                   Title: Vice President
                                                   Date:  February 27, 2004
#### (A) In the Matter of Kenneth Gaynor v. Robert E. Murphy, as Warden of Auburn Prison. (B) The People of the State of New York ex rel. Matthew J. Lambert v. Walter H. Wilkins, as Warden of Attica Prison. (C) The People of the State of New York ex rel. James T. P. Maher v. Robert E. Murphy, as Warden of Auburn Prison. (D) The People of the State of New York ex rel. William Moore v. Walter H. Wilkins, as Warden of Attica Prison. (E) The People of the State of New York ex rel. Christopher Columbus Nelson, Jr. v. Walter H. Wilkins, as Warden of Attica Prison. (F) In the Matter of Martin Sostre v. Walter H. Wilkins, *1005as Warden of Attica Prison.

[In each action] Motion to prosecute an appeal as a poor person, and for other relief, denied.
# C_2023234EN.01001001.xml

| 3.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/10

---

Corrigendum to Prior notification of a concentration (Case M. 11115 – ADNOC / ÖBAG / OMV) – Candidate case for simplified procedure

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 226 of 28 June 2023
  )

(2023/C 234/06)

On page 10, point 2, third indent:

for:

‘OMV, currently a solely controlled subsidiary of ÖBAG, is a global energy and petrochemicals group active in upstream and downstream oil and gas activities, as well as in the production and commercialisation of polyolefins and base chemicals.’,

read:

‘OMV is a global energy and petrochemicals group active in upstream and downstream oil and gas activities, as well as in the production and commercialisation of polyolefins and base chemicals.’.

---
§ 918.20 Approval of Louisiana abandoned mine land reclamation plan. The Secretary approved the Louisiana abandoned mine land reclamation plan, as submitted on February 3, 1986, effective December 10, 1986. Copies of the approved plan are available at: ( a ) Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Conservation, Injection and Mining Division, 625 N. 4th Street, P.O. Box 94275, Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9275.
( b ) Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Tulsa Field Office, 5100 East Skelly Drive, Suite 470, Tulsa, OK 74135-6548.
[64 FR 20167, Apr. 26, 1999]
§ 550.167 How may I obtain or assign my interest in a RUE? ( a ) To obtain a RUE or request an assignment of an interest in a RUE, the applicant or assignee must file an application and provide the information contained in § 550.161 if a change in uses is planned and must obtain BOEM's approval.
( b ) An application for approval of an assignment of an interest in a RUE, in whole or in part, must be filed in triplicate with the Regional Director. Such application must be supported by a statement that the assignee agrees to comply with and to be bound by the terms and conditions of the RUE grant. The assignee must satisfy the bonding requirements in § 550.166. No RUE assignment will be recognized unless and until it is first approved, in writing, by the Regional Director. The assignee of an interest in a RUE must pay the same service fee as that listed in § 550.106(a)(1) for a lease record title assignment request.
( c ) BOEM may disapprove an assignment in the following circumstances: ( 1 ) When the assignee has unsatisfied obligations under the regulations in this chapter or in chapters II or XII of this title, or under any applicable BOEM or BSEE order;
( 2 ) When an assignment is not acceptable as to form or content (e.g., containing incorrect legal description, not executed by a person authorized to bind the corporation, assignee does not meet the requirements of §§ 556.401 through 556.405 of this subchapter);
( 3 ) When the assignment does not comply with or would conflict with this part, or any other applicable laws or regulations (e.g., Departmental debarment rules); or
( 4 ) When the assignee does not meet the applicable financial assurance requirements in § 550.166 and part 556, subpart I of this subchapter, or has not complied with a BOEM or BSEE order.
[89 FR 31589, Apr. 24, 2024]
### §4332. Hearings on claims; rules and regulations; delegation of powers

The officer or agency empowered to entertain claims under sections 4309(a), 4329, and 4331 of this title shall have power to hold such hearings as may be deemed necessary; to prescribe rules and regulations governing the form and contents of claims, the proof thereof, and all other matters related to proceedings on such claims; and in connection with such proceedings to issue subpenas, administer oaths, and examine witnesses. Such powers, and any other powers conferred upon such officer or agency by sections 4309(a), 4329, and 4331 of this title may be exercised through subordinate officers designated by such officer or agency.

(Oct. 6, 1917, ch. 106, §35, as added Dec. 18, 1941, ch. 593, title III, §305, as added Aug. 8, 1946, ch. 878, §1, 60 Stat. 928.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 35 of the former Appendix to this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Prior to classification as section 35, section was formerly classified to section 620 of the former Appendix to this title.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****National compensation survey.Crook County, OR.**
 
February 1998 | May 2006
 
SuDoc Number:L 2.121/57:C 87/
Item Number:0768-B-55 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000754780
 
August 27, 2019
#### INDIAN TOWING CO., Inc. et al. v. UNITED STATES.

No. 14747.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 22, 1954.

Richard B. Montgomery, Jr., New Orleans, La., for appellant.

M. Hepburn Many, Asst. U. S. Atty., New Orleans, La., Paul A. Sweeney, Chief Appellate Sec., Dept, of Justice, Alan S. Rosenthal, Atty., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., Warren E. Burger, Asst. Atty. Gen., George R. Blue, U. S. Atty., New Orleans, La., Leavenworth Colby, Atty., Dept, of Justice, for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and BORAH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act, Sec. 1346(b) Title 28 U.S.C., the suit was for cargo damage from the wetting of the cargo of the Barge AS-16, while in tow of *the*tug “Navajo”, as a result of the grounding of the tug on Chandeleur Island on or about October 1, 1951, “due solely to the failure of the light on the island.”

The claim was that the failure of the light was due to the negligence of Chief Petty Officer Stone and other officers and members of the Coast Guard in charge of “aids to navigation” in failing to properly check the light to see whether it was operating properly between September 7th and October 1st, and that the grounding of the tug was due to the negligence of the Coast Guard in maintaining and servicing the light and in not notifying vessels that it was not functioning.

The United States filing a motion to dismiss, the motion was sustained on the authority of Dalehite v. U. S., 346 U.S. 15, 73 S.Ct. 956, 97 L.Ed. 1427.

Appealing from the order, appellants are here insisting that the facts alleged as ground for recovery here do not bring the case within the facts of, or the reasons for, the decision in the Delehite case while appellee as vigorously insists that that decision and the decision in the Feres case1 are controlling here.

We are of the clear opinion *that*this is so, and that, under the principles, governing the liability of the United States under the invoked act, laid down in those cases, the judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

1

. Feres v. United States, 340 U.S 135, 71 S.Ct. 153, 95 L.Ed. 152.
#### § 717.19 [Reserved]
### §120104. Evaluation

(a) In General.—At reasonable and appropriate intervals, as determined by the Secretary, the Secretary may—

(1) conduct an evaluation of the accomplishments of a National Heritage Area in accordance with subsection (b); and

(2) prepare and submit to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives a report that includes recommendations for the continued role of the Service with respect to each National Heritage Area in accordance with subsection (c).

(b) Components.—An evaluation under subsection (a)(1) shall—

(1) assess the progress of the applicable local coordinating entity of a National Heritage Area with respect to—

(A) accomplishing the purposes of the applicable National Heritage Area; and

(B) achieving the goals and objectives of the management plan;

(2) analyze Federal, State, local, Tribal government, and private investments in the National Heritage Area to determine the leverage and impact of the investments; and

(3) review the management structure, partnership relationships, and funding of the National Heritage Area for purposes of identifying the critical components for sustainability of the National Heritage Area.

(c) Recommendations.—Each report under subsection (a)(2) shall include—

(1) if the report contains a recommendation of the Secretary that Federal funding for the applicable National Heritage Area should be continued, an analysis of—

(A) any means by which that Federal funding may be reduced or eliminated over time; and

(B) the appropriate time period necessary to achieve the recommended reduction or elimination of Federal funding; or

(2) if the report contains a recommendation of the Secretary that Federal funding for the applicable National Heritage Area should be eliminated, a description of potential impacts on conservation, interpretation, and sustainability in the applicable National Heritage Area.

(Added Pub. L. 117–339, §2(a), Jan. 5, 2023, 136 Stat. 6161.)
### §3223. Educational scholarship program

The head of a department or agency containing an element of the intelligence community may establish an undergraduate or graduate training program with respect to civilian employees and prospective civilian employees of such element similar in purpose, conditions, content, and administration to the program that the Secretary of Defense is authorized to establish under section 3614 of this title.

(July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title X, §1023, as added Pub. L. 111–259, title III, §312(e)(1), Oct. 7, 2010, 124 Stat. 2664.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 441o of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
§ 7.303 Application requirements. ( a ) An application for approval of a motor assembly shall include a composite drawing or drawings with the following information: ( 1 ) Model (type), frame size, and rating of the motor assembly.
( 2 ) Overall dimensions of the motor assembly, including conduit box if applicable, and internal free volume.
( 3 ) Material and quantity for each of the component parts that form the explosion-proof enclosure or enclosures.
( 4 ) All dimensions (including tolerances) and specifications required to ascertain compliance with the requirements of § 7.304 of this part.
( b ) All drawings shall be titled, dated, numbered, and include the latest revision.
#### POWELL v. HARRISON et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

January 4, 1905.)

Action by Martin Powell against Everett Harrison and others.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

SMITH, J., not sitting.
Exhibit 99.1


Certification of Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of
Earth Sciences, Inc. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


I, Mark H. McKinnies, certify that:

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Earth Sciences,
Inc.(the "Company) for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark
H. McKinnies, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, to the best of my knowledge, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)	the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2)	the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


/s/  Mark H. McKinnies
---------------------------------
Name:  Mark H. McKinnies
Title:  President and Treasurer
Date:  November 14, 2002
### §100732. Preservation and management of System units by Secretary; promulgation of regulations

To preserve for the benefit of present and future generations the pristine beauty of System units, and to further the purposes of section 100101(a), chapter 1003, and sections 100751(a), 100752, 100753, and 102101 of this title and the individual organic Acts for the System units, all activities resulting from the exercise of mineral rights on patented or unpatented mining claims within any System unit shall be subject to such regulations prescribed by the Secretary as the Secretary considers necessary or desirable for the preservation and management of the System units.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3109.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 100732 | 16 U.S.C. 1902. | Pub. L. 94–429, §2, Sept. 28, 1976, 90 Stat. 1342. |

Section

The word "valid" is omitted for clarity because regulations apply to the exercise of mining claim rights before they are determined to be valid. The word "existing" is omitted as obsolete.
### §20102. Selection of polling facilities

#### (a) Accessibility to all polling places as responsibility of each political subdivision

Within each State, except as provided in subsection (b), each political subdivision responsible for conducting elections shall assure that all polling places for Federal elections are accessible to handicapped and elderly voters.

#### (b) Exception

Subsection (a) shall not apply to a polling place—

(1) in the case of an emergency, as determined by the chief election officer of the State; or

(2) if the chief election officer of the State—

(A) determines that all potential polling places have been surveyed and no such accessible place is available, nor is the political subdivision able to make one temporarily accessible, in the area involved; and

(B) assures that any handicapped or elderly voter assigned to an inaccessible polling place, upon advance request of such voter (pursuant to procedures established by the chief election officer of the State)—

(i) will be assigned to an accessible polling place, or

(ii) will be provided with an alternative means for casting a ballot on the day of the election.

#### (c) Report to Federal Election Commission

(1) Not later than December 31 of each even-numbered year, the chief election officer of each State shall report to the Federal Election Commission, in a manner to be determined by the Commission, the number of accessible and inaccessible polling places in such State on the date of the preceding general Federal election, and the reasons for any instance of inaccessibility.

(2) Not later than April 30 of each odd-numbered year, the Federal Election Commission shall compile the information reported under paragraph (1) and shall transmit that information to the Congress.

(3) The provisions of this subsection shall only be effective for a period of 10 years beginning on September 28, 1984.

(Pub. L. 98–435, §3, Sept. 28, 1984, 98 Stat. 1678.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1973ee–1 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable with respect to elections taking place after Dec. 31, 1985, see section 9 of Pub. L. 98–435, set out as a note under section 20101 of this title.
§ 916.20 Approval of Kansas abandoned mine land reclamation plan. The Secretary conditionally approved the Kansas abandoned mine land reclamation plan, as submitted on October 1, 1981, effective February 1, 1982. He fully approved the Kansas plan, as amended by Kansas House Bill No. 2994 on April 14, 1982, and Kansas House Bill No. 2516 on May 2, 1983, and removed all conditions prohibiting the funding of State abandoned mine land construction grants, effective June 3, 1983. Copies of the approved plan are available at: ( a ) Kansas Department of Health and Environment, Surface Mining Section, 4033 Parkview Drive, Frontenac, KS 66763.
( b ) Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Mid-Continent Regional Coordinating Center, Alton Federal Building, 501 Belle Street, Alton, IL 62002.
[64 FR 20167, Apr. 26, 1999]
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 12

                                   CSFB (USA), INC.
          STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                        (In thousands, except for ratio)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                            FOR THE
                                                                                                          NINE MONTHS
                                                            FOR THE YEARS ENDED                               ENDED
                                     ------------------------------------------------------------------   -----------
                                        1995           1996         1997          1998         1999          9/00

<S>                                  <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>          <C>
Earnings:
    Income before provision for
      income taxes                   $  298,500    $  473,800    $  661,100    $  600,500    $  953,500    $  725,700

Add: Fixed Charges
    Interest expense (gross)          2,699,769     2,865,800     4,012,209     4,501,242     4,839,810     5,451,692

        Interest factor in rents         22,064        25,515        29,351        38,517        52,563        44,133
                                     ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------
        Total fixed charges           2,721,833     2,891,315     4,041,560     4,539,759     4,892,373     5,495,825

Earnings before fixed charges,
  and provision for income taxes     $3,020,333    $3,365,115    $4,702,660    $5,140,259    $5,845,873    $6,221,525
                                     ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges         1.11          1.16          1.16          1.13          1.19          1.13
                                     ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========
</TABLE>
#### City of New York, Appellant, v. Crown Crane Rental Co., Inc., et al., Respondents. John J. McInerney, Respondent, v. Crown Crane Renting Co., Inc., et al., Respondents.

Appeal from order entered on or about April 25, 1962, dismissed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. Since the motion was one for reargument the order denying the motion is not appealable (see *Polito*v. *Town of Babylon,*5 A D 2d 877). Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 800
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54972, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 800 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93381, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 800.60 Terms and conditions for liability insurance. ( a ) The regulatory authority shall require the applicant to submit as part of its permit application a certificate issued by an insurance company authorized to do business in the United States certifying that the applicant has a public liability insurance policy in force for the surface coal mining and reclamation operations for which the permit is sought. Such policy shall provide for personal injury and property damage protection in an amount adequate to compensate any persons injured or property damaged as a result of the surface coal mining and reclamation operations, including the use of explosives, and who are entitled to compensation under the applicable provisions of State law. Minimum insurance coverage for bodily injury and property damage shall be $300,000 for each occurrence and $500,000 aggregate.
( b ) The policy shall be maintained in full force during the life of the permit or any renewal thereof and the liability period necessary to complete all reclamation operations under this Chapter.
( c ) The policy shall include a rider requiring that the insurer notify the regulatory authority whenever substantive changes are made in the policy including any termination or failure to renew.
( d ) The regulatory authority may accept from the applicant, in lieu of a certificate for a public liability insurance policy, satisfactory evidence from the applicant that it satisfies applicable State self-insurance requirements approved as part of the regulatory program and the requirements of this section.
[48 FR 32959, July 19, 1983, as amended at 54 FR 13823, Apr. 5, 1989; 81 FR 93381, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54972, Nov. 17, 2017]