alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Certification of Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the Quartely Report of Tradequest International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2004 with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randall
K. Read, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






August 24, 2004               /s/ Randall K. Read
---------------               -----------------------------------
                              Randall K. Read
                              Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Universal Detection Technology (the "Registrant") for the year ending December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Jacques Tizabi, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Date: December __, 2015  By: /s/ Jacques Tizabi Jacques Tizabi, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer  This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Pc,~~s '2--3> - 3>3 

~\-e.-<"\.\-\o(,)Q\\ ~ g\Clf\~ 
l<l-\-~ \\-\-\ ON'-\\'{ 

tj\O--\\ ~
§ 590.7 Do I have to comply with the decision or order while my appeal is pending? ( a ) The decision or order is effective during the 60-day period for filing an appeal under § 590.3 unless: ( 1 ) BOEM notifies you that the decision or order, or some portion of it, is suspended during this period because there is no likelihood of immediate and irreparable harm to human life, the environment, any mineral deposit, or property; or
( 2 ) You post a surety bond under 30 CFR 550.1409 pending the appeal challenging an order to pay a civil penalty.
( b ) This section applies rather than 43 CFR 4.21(a) for appeals of BOEM orders.
( c ) After you file your appeal, IBLA may grant a stay of a decision or order under 43 CFR 4.21(b); however, a decision or order remains in effect until IBLA grants your request for a stay of the decision or order under appeal.
[76 FR 64623, Oct. 18, 2011, as amended by 89 FR 31598, Apr. 24, 2024]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

                    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of Information Office at                     *https://www.federalreserve.gov/​foia/​request.htm.*                     Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.                

Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than January 5, 2021.

                    A.                     *Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas*                     (Robert L. Triplett III, Senior Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:                

                    1.                     *Robert G. Good, Calvin J. Good, Hannah G. Good, all of Corrales, New Mexico; Cynthia Alysce Good, Robert A. Good, and Natalie G. Good, all of Arlington, Massachusetts;*                     to join the Graves-Good Family Group, a group acting in concert, to retain voting shares of Goldthwaite Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of MCBank, both of Goldthwaite, Texas.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 16, 2020.

Michele Taylor Fennell,

Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2020-28109 Filed 12-18-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
EXHIBIT 23(ii)


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Forms S-3 No. 333-15371 as supplemented on July 13, 1998 and February
8, 1999) of Techdyne, Inc. and in the related Prospectus of our report dated
March 9, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Techdyne, Inc. as of and for the two years ended December 31, 2000
included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                        /s/ WISS & COMPANY, LLP
                                        -------------------------------
                                        Wiss & Company, LLP


March 28, 2001
Livingston, New Jersey
#### § 57.22303 Approved equipment (I-C mines).

Only electrical equipment that is approved by MSHA under the applicable requirements of 30 CFR parts 18 through 28 or approved under 30 CFR part 29 contained in the 30 CFR, parts 1-199, edition, revised as of July 1, 1999, shall be used underground, except for submersible sump pumps.

[64 FR 43283, Aug. 10, 1999]
### **CHAPTER 203—REGISTRATION AND VOTING BY ABSENT UNIFORMED SERVICES VOTERS AND OVERSEAS VOTERS IN ELECTIONS FOR FEDERAL OFFICE**

Sec.
20301.
Federal responsibilities.
20301a.
Duties of Secretary under Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act.
20302.
State responsibilities.
20303.
Federal write-in absentee ballot in general elections for Federal office for absent uniformed services voters and overseas voters.
20304.
Procedures for collection and delivery of marked absentee ballots of absent overseas uniformed services voters.
20305.
Federal Voting Assistance Program Improvements.
20306.
Prohibition of refusal of applications on grounds of early submission.
20307.
Enforcement.
20308.
Reporting requirements.
20309.
Effect on certain other laws.
20310.
Definitions.
20311.
Technology pilot program.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to this chapter were contained in subchapters I–D and I–E (1973cc et seq. and 1973dd et seq.) of chapter 20 of title 42 prior to repeal by Pub. L. 99–410 and then in subchapter I–G (1973ff et seq.) of chapter 20 of title 42 prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this chapter.
§ 706.13 When to file. ( a ) Employees performing functions or duties under the Act will be required to file: ( 1 ) Within 120 days of the effective date of these regulations, and
( 2 ) Annually on February 1 of each year or at such other date as may be agreed to by the Director, provided that such alternative date will allow sufficient time to obtain information needed by the Director for his or her annual report to the Congress.
( b ) New employees hired, appointed, or transferred to perform functions or duties under the Act will be required to file at the time of entrance to duty.
( c ) New employees are not required to file an annual statement on the subsequent annual filing date if this date occurs within two months after their initial statement was filed. For example, an employee entering duty on December 1, 1978 would file a statement on that date. Because December 1 is within two months of February 1 the employee would not be required to file his or her next annual statement until February 1, 1980.
§ 77.1200 Mine map. The operator shall maintain an accurate and up-to-date map of the mine, on a scale of not less than 100 nor more than 500 feet to the inch, at or near the mine, in an area chosen by the mine operator, with a duplicate copy on file at a separate and distinct location, to minimize the danger of destruction by fire or other hazard. The map shall show: ( a ) Name and address of the mine;
( b ) The property or boundary lines of the active areas of the mine;
( c ) Contour lines passing through whole number elevations of the coalbed being mined. The spacing of such lines shall not exceed 25-foot elevation levels, except that a broader spacing of contour lines may be approved by the District Manager for steeply pitching coalbeds. Contour lines may be placed on overlays or tracings attached to mine maps.
( d ) The general elevation of the coalbed or coalbeds being mined, and the general elevation of the surface;
( e ) Either producing or abandoned oil and gas wells located on the mine property;
( f ) The location and elevation of any body of water dammed or held back in any portion of the mine: *Provided, however,* Such bodies of water may be shown on overlays or tracings attached to the mine maps;
( g ) All prospect drill holes that penetrate the coalbed or coalbeds being mined on the mine property;
( h ) All auger and strip mined areas of the coalbed or coalbeds being mined on the mine property together with the line of maximum depth of holes drilled during auger mining operations.
( i ) All worked out and abandoned areas;
( j ) The location of railroad tracks and public highways leading to the mine, and mine buildings of a permanent nature with identifying names shown;
( k ) Underground mine workings underlying and within 1,000 feet of the active areas of the mine;
( l ) The location and description of at least two permanent base line points, and the location and description of at least two permanent elevation bench marks used in connection with establishing or referencing mine elevation surveys; and,
( m ) The scale of the map.
#### § 877.1 Scope.

This part establishes procedures for entry upon lands or property by OSMRE, States, and Indian tribes for reclamation purposes. For certified States or Indian tribes conducting noncoal reclamation projects under the provisions of part 875, the term “noncoal” replaces all references to “coal” in this part.

[80 FR 6446, Feb. 5, 2015]
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

U.S.C. Section 1350,

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Devcon International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Richard Rochon, Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                              
|------------------------------
|Date: August 19, 2008         
|                              
|/s/ Richard Rochon            
|Richard Rochon                
|Acting Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)
exv10w1



 



Exhibit 10.1



Independent Auditors’ Consent



The Supervisory Board of

Siemens AG:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-81126) on Form S-8 of Siemens AG of our report dated November 28, 2002,
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Siemens AG as of September
30, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income, cash flow
and changes in shareholders’ equity for each of the years in the three-year
period ended September 30, 2002, which report appears in the September 30, 2002
annual report on Form 20-F of Siemens AG.


KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft AG


Munich, Germany

December 5, 2002
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Devcon International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Jan A. Norelid, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 12, 2004 |  | /s/ Jan A. Norelid     
|                        |  | Jan A. Norelid         
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer



Note:
This certification is being furnished, not filed, as exhibit 32.2
#### WILSON v. WILSON et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

January 20, 1903.)

Action by Edward C. Wilson, an infant, by Eliza .1. Sponenberg, his guardian ad litem, against Winfield Wilson and others.

No opinion. Motion granted.
Editorial Note on Part 780
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54949, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 780 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93330, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 780.35 Disposal of excess spoil. ( a ) Each application shall contain descriptions, including appropriate maps and cross section drawings, of the proposed disposal site and design of the spoil disposal structures according to 30 CFR 816.71-816.74. These plans shall describe the geotechnical investigation, design, construction, operation, maintenance, and removal, if appropriate, of the site and structures.
( b ) Except for the disposal of excess spoil on pre existing benches, each application shall contain the results of a geotechnical investigation of the proposed disposal site, including the following: ( 1 ) The character of bedrock and any adverse geologic conditions in the disposal area,
( 2 ) A survey identifying all springs, seepage, and ground water flow observed or anticipated during wet periods in the area of the disposal site;
( 3 ) A survey of the potential effects of subsidence of the subsurface strata due to past and future mining operations;
( 4 ) A technical description of the rock materials to be utilized in the construction of those disposal structures containing rock chimney cores or underlain by a rock drainage blanket; and
( 5 ) A stability analysis including, but not limited to, strength parameters, pore pressures and long-term seepage conditions. These data shall be accompanied by a description of all engineering design assumptions and calculations and the alternatives considered in selecting the specific design specifications and methods.
( c ) If, under 30 CFR 816.71(d), rock-toe buttresses or key-way cuts are required, the application shall include the following: ( 1 ) The number, location, and depth of borings or test pits which shall be determined with respect to the size of the spoil disposal structure and subsurface conditions; and
( 2 ) Engineering specifications utilized to design the rock-toe buttress or key-way cuts which shall be determined in accordance with paragraph (b)(5) of this section.
[79 FR 76229, Dec. 22, 2014, as amended at 81 FR 93330, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54949, Nov. 17, 2017]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Warren Ostin and William Wirth, Appellants.

Appeals by defendant from two judgments (one as to each defendant) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, rendered September 10, 1976 as to defendant Ostin and September 17, 1976 as to defendant Wirth, convicting each of them of attempted grand larceny in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentences. Judgment rendered September 10, 1976 as to defendant Ostin affirmed. Judgment rendered September 17,1976 as to defendant Wirth affirmed as to the conviction; judgment reversed as to the sentence, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and case remanded to Criminal Term for resentencing of defendant Wirth in accordance herewith. Since the defendants were represented at the trial by the same attorney, the trial court should have ascertained, on the record, whether each defendant had an awareness of the potential risks involved in that course and had knowingly chosen it (see *People v Gomberg,*38 NY2d 307). However, since a careful study of the evidence and the role of each defendant establishes that there was no conflict in their interests, a new trial is not required (see *People v Allini,*60 AD2d 886). The trial court also erred in instructing the jury, in part, that reasonable doubt was "a sound reason, one based on the testimony in the case and one that seems to make sense”. The court’s charge should have been augmented by the further statement that reasonable doubt can also be found in the lack of evidence (see *People v Gambino,*52 AD2d 957). However, since the evidence against the defendants was overwhelming there was no significant probability that the error adversely affected their rights or that the verdict would have been different had the error not been committed (see *People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230). Although a new trial is not warranted, defendant Wirth should be resentenced as a first felony offender. Since the previous crime of which he had been convicted would not have been a felony under New York law, it was improper to punish him as a second felony offender (see Penal Law, § 70.06, subd 1, par [b], cl [i]; *People v Olah,*300 NY 96). In spite of the fact that defendant Wirth did not raise this issue prior to sentencing, we believe the interest of justice warrants the disposition made herein. Hopkins, J. P., Martuscello, Titone and Rabin, JJ., concur.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 15, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

136834 Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, J ustices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 136834 COA: 285166 Clinton CC: 07-008187-FC MICHAEL WAYNE WELLMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 16, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Clinton Circuit Court for correction of the presentence investigation re port as agreed to by the trial court. The circuit court shall forward a copy of the amended report to the Department of Corrections, MCL 771.14(6) and MCR 6.425(E)(2). In all othe r respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questi ons presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l1008 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 15, 2008

Clerk