alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 903.795 Small operator assistance program.

Part 795 of this chapter, *Small Operator Assistance Program,* applies to any person who submits an application for assistance under the small operator assistance program.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED  FEBRUARY 28, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Nov-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Nov-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Feb-28-1999
<CASH>                                         $29,853
<SECURITIES>                                   $0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  $4,619,221
<ALLOWANCES>                                   $0
<INVENTORY>                                    $19,749,574
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               $26,268,888
<PP&E>                                         $59,395,234
<DEPRECIATION>                                 $26,769,552
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 $62,287,055
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          $19,610,884
<BONDS>                                        $0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          $0
<PREFERRED>                                    $0
<COMMON>                                       $392,732
<OTHER-SE>                                     $14,136,674
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   $62,287,055
<SALES>                                        $44,187,791
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               $44,187,791
<CGS>                                          $27,135,886
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  $27,135,886
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               $1,535,921
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               $0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             $544,854
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                $423,421
<INCOME-TAX>                                   $16,724
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            $423,421
<DISCONTINUED>                                 $0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                $0
<CHANGES>                                      $0
<NET-INCOME>                                   $406,697
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.02)
        


</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Ground-water flow in the GulfCoast aquifer systems, south-central United States**
 
Report | Plates: 017A7B7C7D7E7F7G7H7I7J
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.16:1416-F
Item Number:0624 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001052892
 
October 11, 2018
# C_2023190EN.01001501.xml

| 31.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/15

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 190/12)

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Routes concerned | Ancona – Milan Linate and vice versa |
| Period of validity of the contract | From 1 October 2023 to 30 September 2026 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | Two months after the date of publication of this notice |
| Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained | National Civil Aviation Authority (ENAC) |
| Air transport and licensing department |
| Viale Castro Pretorio, 118 |
| 00185 Rome |
| ITALY |

Member State

Italy

Routes concerned

Ancona – Milan Linate and vice versa

Period of validity of the contract

From 1 October 2023 to 30 September 2026

Deadline for submission of tenders

Two months after the date of publication of this notice

Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

National Civil Aviation Authority (ENAC)

Air transport and licensing department

Viale Castro Pretorio, 118

00185 Rome

ITALY

Tel. +39 0644596247

Email: osp@enac.gov.it

Internet: http://www.mit.gov.it

http://www.enac.gov.it

---
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16** 
**- 1924** 

ERIKA GRISELDA RIVERA

- SOLORZANO , Petitioner ,

v.

JEFF ERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted : February 16, 2017 Decided: March 22, 2017

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Aaron R. Caruso, ABOD & CARUSO, LLC, Wheaton, Maryland , for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Anthony C. Payne, Assistant Director, Alexander J. Lutz , Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublish ed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Erika Griselda Rivera

- Solorzano , a native and citizen of El

Salvador , petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing her appeal from the
immigrati on judge’s denial of her requests for asylum,
withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention
Against Torture. * We have thoroughly reviewed the record,
including the transcript of Rivera

- Solorzano’s merits hearing
and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record
evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the
administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B)
(2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s

decision. See INS v. Elias

– Zacarias , 502 U.S. 47 8, 481 (1992).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the
reasons stated by the Board. In re Rivera

- Solorzano (B.I.A.
July 18, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

* Rivera

- Solorzano does not raise any challenges to the agency’s denial of her request for protection under the Convention Against Torture. We would lack jurisdiction over any such claims on the ground that she failed to exhaust h er administrative remedies before the Board

. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1) (2012); Massis v. Mukasey , 549 F.3d 631, 638

– 40 (4th Cir. 2008).3 ma terials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

PETITION DENIE D
Exhibit 32


                                  CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Inforetech Wireless Technology Inc. (the "Company") does
hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 of the
Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information
contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                     /s/ ROBERT C. SILZER, SR.
Date:  August 20, 2003            By:  ___________________________
                                         Robert C. Silzer, Sr.
                                         Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                         Financial Officer
### §3334r. Designation of a chief technology officer within certain elements of the intelligence community

#### (a) Designation authority

The head of each covered element of the intelligence community shall designate a senior official to serve as the chief technology officer of such element.

#### (b) Covered elements

For purposes of this section, the covered elements of the intelligence community are the following:

(1) The Central Intelligence Agency.

(2) The Defense Intelligence Agency.

(3) The Federal Bureau of Investigation.

(4) The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency.

(5) The National Security Agency.

(6) The National Reconnaissance Office.

#### (c) Responsibility

The chief technology officer of each covered element of the intelligence community shall be responsible for assisting the head of such element in the identification and adoption of technology to advance mission needs.

#### (d) Prohibition of dual appointment

Any chief technology officer designated pursuant to subsection (a) may not concurrently serve as the chief information officer, the chief data officer, or the principal science officer of any element of the intelligence community.

(Pub. L. 118–31, div. G, title V, §7504, Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 1083.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

For definition of "intelligence community" as used in this section, see section 7002 of Pub. L. 118–31, set out as a note under section 3003 of this title.
# C_2023143EN.01000401.xml

| 26.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/4

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.11091 – PLATINUM EQUITY GROUP / DIVERSEY HOLDINGS)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 143/04)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Platinum Equity Group, LLC (‘Platinum Equity Group’, USA), |
| --- | --- |

—

Platinum Equity Group, LLC (‘Platinum Equity Group’, USA),

| — | Diversey Holdings Ltd. (‘Diversey’, USA). |
| --- | --- |

—

Diversey Holdings Ltd. (‘Diversey’, USA).

Platinum Equity Group will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Diversey.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | Platinum Equity Group specializes in the acquisition and operation of companies that provide services and solutions to customers in a broad range of business sectors, including information technology, telecommunications, logistics, metal services, manufacturing and distribution, |
| --- | --- |

—

Platinum Equity Group specializes in the acquisition and operation of companies that provide services and solutions to customers in a broad range of business sectors, including information technology, telecommunications, logistics, metal services, manufacturing and distribution,

| — | Diversey is a manufacturer and supplier of a product portfolio of hygiene, infection prevention and cleaning solutions, combining patented chemicals, dosing and dispensing equipment, cleaning machines and services, and ancillary digital analyses. |
| --- | --- |

—

Diversey is a manufacturer and supplier of a product portfolio of hygiene, infection prevention and cleaning solutions, combining patented chemicals, dosing and dispensing equipment, cleaning machines and services, and ancillary digital analyses.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.11091 – PLATINUM EQUITY GROUP / DIVERSEY HOLDINGS

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
| **Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows Supplemental Disclosures (Net cash paid or received) (Details) (USD $)In Thousands, unless otherwise specified** | 9 Months Ended |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
||
| **Supplemental Cash Flow Elements [Abstract]**                                                                                                          |           |   |
| Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized                                                                                                               | $ 40,417       | $ 37,874 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
The amount of cash paid for interest during the period net of cash paid for interest that is capitalized.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 230 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367179&loc=d3e4297-108586
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_InterestPaidNet**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**credit**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_SupplementalCashFlowElementsAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
**EXHIBIT 32****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of Double Eagle PetroleumCo. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, each of Stephen H. Hollis, the ChiefExecutive Officer, and Lonnie R. Brock, the Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, herebycertifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief: (1) theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: May 9, 2007       /s/ Stephen H. Hollis Stephen H. Hollis    Chief Executive Officer         /s/ Lonnie R. Brock Lonnie R. Brock    Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 12.2  Questar Pipeline Company Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges  12 Months Ended December 31,201020092008(dollars in millions)EarningsIncome before income taxes and adjustment for income
from equity investee$102.4$88.2$90.8Add (deduct):Fixed charges31.432.234.8Distributed income from equity investee4.03.3-Capitalized interest(1.0)(0.9)(0.4)Total Earnings$136.8$122.8$125.2--Fixed ChargesInterest expense$  28.8$  29.5$  32.7Capitalized interest1.00.90.4Estimate of interest within rental expense1.61.81.7Total Fixed Charges$  31.4$  32.2$  34.8--Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges4.43.83.6  For purposes of this presentation, earnings represent income before income taxes adjusted for fixed charges, earnings and distributions of equity investee. Income before income taxes includes Questar Pipeline's share of pretax earnings of equity investee. Fixed charges consist of total interest charges (expensed and capitalized), amortization of debt issuance costs and losses from reacquired debt, and the interest portion of rental expense estimated at 50%.
#### SOUTHERN MUTUAL INS. CO. vs. HOLCOMBE’S ADMINISTRATOR.

[CONTEST AMONG- CREDITORS OE INSOLVENT ESTATE.]

1. *Construction of lili of exceptions.*— Where the bill of exceptions, after setting out certain evidence introduced by the parties, states that “ thereupon” the court rendered its decision, the appellate court, adopting the construction less favorable to the appellant, will not regard this as an assertion that the bill of exceptions contains all the evidence on which the court acted.

2. *Presumption in favor of ruling of primary court.*— In a probate case, where the correctness of the ruling of the primary court depends on the proof, and the bill of exceptions does not purport to set out all the evidence on which the probate judge acted, the appellate court will presume that his decision was justified by the evidence.

Appeal from the Probate Court of Mobile.

In the matter of the final settlement of the estate of John C. Holcombe, deceased, which was duly declared *328insolvent on the 2d April, 1855, and against which the appellant hied as a claim an account for $753 51. The rejection of this claim is Ihe only matter assigned as error. The ground on which the opinion of this court is based, renders it unnecessary to state the evidence contained in the bill of exceptions.

E. S. Blount, for appellant.

Jno. T. Taylor, *contra.*

A. J. WALKER, O. J.

The bill of exceptions, after a statement of evidence, says, that “ *thereupon"*the court rejected the appellant’s claim. Adopting the construction less favorable to the appellant, we cannot regard this as an assertion that the bill of exceptions contains all the evidence upon which the court acted; and consequently, we cannot affirm that there was error in the rejection oí the appellant’s claim. — Keep v. Kelly & Levin, 29 Ala. 322 ; Bradley v. Andress, 30 Ala. 80 ; Lovett v. Chisolm, 30 Ala. 88; Stein v. Feltheimer, 31 Ala. 57.

The decree of the court below is affirmed.
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.507 Power connection points.

[Statutory Provisions]

Except where permissible power connection units are used, all power-connection points outby the last open crosscut shall be in intake air.
# C_2009233EN.01002101.xml

| 26.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 233/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/21

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 23 July 2009 — Kat and Others v Council and Commission

(Joined Cases T-530/93, T-531/93, T-87/94, T-91/94, T-106/94, T-120/94 and T-124/94) (1)

1

2009/C 233/38

Language of the case: Dutch

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the joined cases be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 334, 9.12.1993.

1

---
#### MAZURKOWITZ, Respondent, v. SHINKO et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 16, 1903.)

Action by Blary Mazurkowitz against John Shinko and another.

No opinion. Judgment of the Blunipipal Court affirmed by default, with costs.
### §2462. Compliance with Federal Acquisition Regulation

The Administrator shall establish procedures to ensure that the mission and programs of the Administration are executed in full compliance with all applicable provisions of the Federal Acquisition Regulation issued pursuant to section 1303(a)(1) of title 41.

(Pub. L. 106–65, div. C, title XXXII, §3262, Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 967; Pub. L. 113–66, div. C, title XXXI, §3145(g), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 1071.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2013—Pub. L. 113–66 substituted "section 1303(a)(1) of title 41" for "the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 401 et seq.)", which had been translated as "division B (except sections 1123, 2303, 2304, and 2313) of subtitle I of title 41" based on the enactment of Title 41, Public Contracts, by Pub. L. 111–350.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Mar. 1, 2000, see section 3299 of Pub. L. 106–65, set out as a note under section 2401 of this title.
### §207. Persons affected by suspension of commercial intercourse

The provisions of this chapter in relation to commercial intercourse shall apply to all commercial intercourse by and between persons residing or being within districts within the lines of national military occupation in the States or parts of States declared in insurrection, whether with each other or with persons residing or being within districts declared in insurrection and not within those lines; and all persons within the United States, not native or naturalized citizens thereof, shall be subject to the same prohibitions, in all commercial intercourse with inhabitants of States or parts of States declared in insurrection, as citizens of States not declared to be in insurrection.

(R.S. §5303.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §5303 derived from act July 2, 1864, ch. 225, §4, 13 Stat. 376.
### §10311. Impairment of voting rights of persons holding current registration

Nothing in chapters 103 to 107 of this title shall be construed to deny, impair, or otherwise adversely affect the right to vote of any person registered to vote under the law of any State or political subdivision.

(Pub. L. 89–110, title I, §17, Aug. 6, 1965, 79 Stat. 446; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 91–285, §2, June 22, 1970, 84 Stat. 314.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1973n of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.