alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 D0 17 7

. S AW S AT SEVEN HI LLS, LLC et a l

. v

. PAULDI NG COUNTY,
GEORGI A et a l

.

Saws at Sev en Hi l l s , LLC an d Nat u re W al k D ev el o p m en t Co m p an y , In c. (“ Ap p li can t s ”) s eek d i s cret io n ary rev i ew o f a s u peri o r co u rt o rd er g ran t i ng s u m m ary ju d g m en t t o Pau ld i n g Co u nt y an d o t h ers i n Ap p l i can ts ’ ap p eal o f a rezo n i n g d eci s i o n.

I n t h ei r ap p eal

, Ap p l ican t s s o u g h t

– am o ng o t h er t hi n gs

– a wri t o f m an d am u s

o rd eri n g t h e co un t y t o co m p l y wi t h t h e t erm s o f a d ev e l o p m e n t a g reem en t

. Th e

Su p rem e Co u rt has ex cl u s i v e ap p el l at e ju ri s d ict i o n o v er al l cas es i nv o l v i n g

ex t rao rd i n ary rem ed i es , i n cl ud in g m an d am u s

. See G a. Co n s t

. o f 19 8 3, Art

. VI, Sec.

VI, Par. III (5 ); La d

z i n s ke v. Al l en , 2 8 0 G a. 2 6 4 (6 26 SE2 d 8 3 ) (2 0 0 6 ) (“ ‘ [ C ]a s es

i n v o l v i n g t h e g ran t o r d en i al of m an d a m u s a r e wi t h i n t h e ex cl u s i v e ju ri s d i ct i o n o f

[t h e S u p r e m e] Co u rt wi t h o u t reg ard t o th e u n d erl y i ng s u bject m at t er o r t h e l eg al

i s su es rai s ed .’ ”). Acco rd i n g l y , t h i s ap p li cat i o n i s h ereb y T R A N S F E RRED t o t h e

Su p rem e Co u rt fo r d i s p o s i t i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 12/29/2015 December 29, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000936340
<NAME> DTE ENERGY COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             123
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      440
<ALLOWANCES>                                        20
<INVENTORY>                                        292
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   989
<PP&E>                                          15,509
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,602
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,442
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,249
<BONDS>                                          3,757
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        144
<COMMON>                                         1,951
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,640
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,442
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   945
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      712
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     3
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  74
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    156
<INCOME-TAX>                                        52
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                104
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       104
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .72
        

</TABLE>
Manufactured Home Shipments January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013

State Single Wides Multi Wides Total Floors

AK 57 6 63 69

AL 1084 1312 2396 3740

AR 647 821 1468 2300

AZ 288 727 1015 1765

CA 258 1,906 2,164 4,194

CO 465 253 718 973

CT 51 48 99 147

DE 100 165 265 432

FL 856 2164 3020 5257

GA 389 1046 1435 2485

HI 0 4 4 8

IA 220 98 318 414

ID 95 177 272 466

IL 451 287 738 1,031

IN 840 315 1,155 1,471

KS 197 169 366 534

KY 925 1,338 2,263 3,613

LA 2661 1618 4279 5978

MA 49 84 133 220

MD 169 81 250 331

ME 151 189 340 529

MI 977 636 1,613 2,249

MN 219 225 444 671

MO 400 408 808 1,215

MS 1184 1263 2447 3744

MT 291 195 486 691

NC 1,244 1,459 2,703 4,164

ND 400 383 783 1,176

NE 177 72 249 321

NH 95 169 264 433

NJ 110 94 204 298

NM 441 658 1,099 1,768

NV 86 152 238 402

NY 573 833 1,406 2,239

OH 542 446 988 1,434

OK 871 869 1,740 2,619

OR 155 540 695 1,289

PA 487 813 1,300 2,115

RI 3 2 57

SC 832 1240 2072 3328

SD 195 196 391 591

TN 681 1,179 1,860 3,050

TX 7077 5140 12217 17429

UT 30 140 170 316

Page 1 of 2
Manufactured Home Shipments January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013

VA 506 581 1,087 1,671

VT 57 58 115 173

WA 65 596 661 1,330

WI 177 131 308 439

WV 351 700 1,051 1,754

WY 183 82 265 346

Canada 1 0 1 1

Destination Pending 34 31 65 97

Grand Total 28,397 32,099 60,496 93,317

Note that this data represents state of first destination and may not be final state of

installation and occupancy.

Page 2 of 2
# Tables of Summary Health Statistics

Print

Minus

Naming convention for Summary Health Statistics Tables:
        - “ALC-#”, “BW-#”, “PA-#”, “SLP-#”, “TOB-#” tables are based on U.S. Adults
        - “A-#” tables are based on U.S. adults
        - “C-#” tables are based on U.S. children
        - “P-#” tables are based on the U.S. population
        - “a” worksheets contain age-adjusted percentages or rates
        - “b” worksheets contain frequencies
        - “c” worksheets contain crude (unadjusted) percentages or rates

Technical Notes for Summary Health Statistics Tables: National Health Interview Survey [PDF – 246 KB]

 

## Filter Tables By

Year:20182017201620152014201320122011Age:2-17 years3-17 years5-17 yearsunder 18 years18-69 years18 years and overunder 65 yearsall agesKeyword:activities of daily livingactivityactivity limitationADDADHDaerobicalcoholallergiesanginaarthritisasthmaattention deficit disorderattention deficit hyperactivity disorderbed daysbendbody mass indexbreast cancercancercervical cancercessationchronic bronchitischronic conditionchronic joint symptomscigarettecirculatoryclimbcombustible tobaccocomplete tooth lossCOPDcoronary heart diseasecostdental caredental visitdiabetesdoctor contactdoctor visitsdrinkingearly interventionedentulismeffortemergency roomemphysemaexternal causeexerciseface painfallfibromyalgiagoutgrasphay feverheadachehealth care access and utilizationhealth insurance coveragehealth statushealthy weighthearingheart attackheart diseasehigh blood pressureHIVhopelessnesshospital stayshuman immunodeficiency virus testinghypertensioninjuriesinstrumental activities of daily livinginsuredjaw painkidney diseasekneellast dental visitlast doctor contactlearning disabilityleisure-time physical activityliftlimitationliver diseaselower back painlupusmental healthmigrainemuscle-strengtheningmyocardial infarctionneck painnervousnessobeseoverweightphysical functioningplacepoisoningsprescription medicationprostate cancerpullpushquit attemptreachrespiratoryrestlessnessrheumatoid arthritissadnessschool absencesserious psychological distresssinusitissitsleepsmokeless tobaccosmokingspecial educationstandstoopstroketobaccoulcerunderweightuninsuredunmet medical needusual place of health carevisionwalkwork activitywork-loss daysworthlessness

 

November 5, 2019
National Center for Health Statistics

- Facebook
- Twitter
- LinkedIn
- Syndicate
### §3373a. Support for and oversight of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force

#### (a) Availability of data on unidentified aerial phenomena

The Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of Defense shall jointly require that each element of the intelligence community and component of the Department of Defense with data relating to unidentified aerial phenomena makes 1 such data available immediately to the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force, or successor entity, and to the National Air and Space Intelligence Center.

#### (b) Quarterly reports

#### (1) In general

Not later than 90 days after March 15, 2022, and not less frequently than quarterly thereafter, the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force, or successor entity, consistent with the protection of intelligence sources and methods, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the findings of the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force, or successor entity.

#### (2) Contents

Each report submitted under paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum, the following:

(A) All reported unidentified aerial phenomena-related events that occurred during the period covered by the report.

(B) All reported unidentified aerial phenomena-related events that occurred during a period other than the period covered by the report but were not included in an earlier report.

#### (3) Form

Each report submitted under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in classified form.

#### (c) Definitions

In this section:

#### (1) Appropriate congressional committees

The term "appropriate congressional committees" means the following:

(A) The congressional intelligence committees.

(B) The Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate.

#### (2) Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force

The term "Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force" means the task force established by the Department of Defense on August 4, 2020, to be led by the Department of the Navy, under the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security.

(Pub. L. 117–103, div. X, title IV, §413, Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 977.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

For definitions of "congressional intelligence committees" and "intelligence community", referred to in text, see section 2 of div. X of Pub. L. 117–103, set out as a note under section 3003 of this title.

1 So in original. Probably should be "make".
#### PEOPLE ex rel. LEACH v. WOODBURY.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 9, 1903.)

Proceeding by the people of the state of New York, on the relation of Michael H. Leach, against John McG. Woodbury.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs.
#### SMITH et al., Appellants, v. IRVIN, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 10, 1905.)

Action by Mary I. Smith and others against Mary M. Irvin, individually, etc. R. K. Prentice, for appellants. F. Woodbridge, for respondent. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
EXHIBIT 32.2

WRITTEN STATEMENT

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with Quarterly Report of Comtech Group, Inc. and its
subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Hope Ni, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |        |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 14, 2006 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Hope Ni            
|                       |  | Name:  |  | Hope Ni                
|                       |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
131 STAT. 2278 PUBLIC LAW 115–114—JAN. 10, 2018 

Public Law 115–114 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To require a new or updated Federal website that is intended for use by the 

public to be mobile friendly, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Connected Government Act’’. 

SEC. 2. FEDERAL WEBSITES REQUIRED TO BE MOBILE FRIENDLY. 

(a) AMENDMENT.—Subchapter II of chapter 35 of title 44, United 

States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 

section: 

‘‘§ 3559. Federal websites required to be mobile friendly 

‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—If, on or after the date that is 180 days 

after the date of the enactment of this section, an agency creates 

a website that is intended for use by the public or conducts a 

redesign of an existing legacy website that is intended for use 

by the public, the agency shall ensure to the greatest extent practicable that the website is mobile friendly. 

‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1) AGENCY.—The term ‘agency’ has the meaning given 

that term in section 551 of title 5. 

‘‘(2) MOBILE FRIENDLY.—The term ‘mobile friendly’ means, 

with respect to a website, that the website is configured in 

such a way that the website may be navigated, viewed, and 

accessed on a smartphone, tablet computer, or similar mobile 

device.’’. 

(b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of 

sections at the beginning of chapter 35 of title 44, United States 

Code, is amended by adding after the item related to section 3558 

the following new item: 

‘‘3559. Federal websites required to be mobile friendly.’’. 

(c) REPORT BY OMB AND GSA REQUIRED.—Not later than 18 

months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director 

of the Office of Management and Budget, in consultation with 

the Administrator of General Services, shall make publicly available 

and submit to Congress a report that— 

(1) describes the implementation of the requirement 

described under section 3559 of title 44, United States Code, 

as added by subsection (a); and 

Deadline. 

Consultation. 

Public 

information. 

44 USC 3501 

prec. 

Time period. 

44 USC 3559. 

Connected 

Government Act. 

44 USC 101 note. 

Jan. 10, 2018 

[H.R. 2331] 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
PUBLIC LAW 115–114—JAN. 10, 2018 131 STAT. 2279 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2331: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 115–406 (Comm. on Oversight and Government Reform). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017): 

Nov. 13, 15, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 21, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

(2) assesses the compliance of each agency with such 

requirement. 

Approved January 10, 2018. 

Assessment. 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6651

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JONATHAN JIMENEZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, 

District Judge. (5:01-cr-30058-SGW-6; 5:13-cv-80564-SGW-RSB)

Submitted: August 22, 2013 Decided: August 27, 2013

Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathan Jimenez, Appellant Pro Se. Jeb Thomas Terrien, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Jimenez seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2013) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Jimenez has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 7.22 Definitions.

The following definitions apply in this subpart:

*Brattice cloth.* A curtain of jute, plastic, or similar material used to control or direct ventilating air.

*Denier.* A unit of yarn size indicating the fineness of fiber of material based on the number of grams in a length of 9,000 meters.

*Film.* A sheet of flexible material applied to a scrim by pressure, temperature, adhesion, or other method.

*Scrim.* A substrate material of plastic or fabric laminated between or coated with a film.

*Ventilation tubing.* Rigid or flexible tubing used to convey ventilating air.
(No. 93-CC-2498

#### G.S. Robins & Co., Claimant, *v.*The State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed August 18, 1993.*

*Order filed June 29, 1994.*

G.S. Robins & Co., pro *se,*for Claimant.

Roland W. Rurris, Attorney General (Lawrence C. Rippe, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

*452ORDER

JANN, J.

The record in this cause indicates that this is a standard lapsed appropriation claim which should be paid in accordance with the above stipulation. This payment is made in full and final satisfaction of this claim. It is so ordered.

ORDER

JANN, J.

This cause comes on to be heard on the Claimants motion for accrued interest, due notice having been given, and the Court being advised.

The Claimant filed this claim on March 26, 1993, seeking payment for raw materials sold to the Respondents Correctional Industries. Prior demand for payment had been denied due to the lapsing of the appropriation or expenditure authority. On September 20, 1993, an award in the amount of $3,976 was entered. Because the bill was payable out of the 301 fund, the Court could not voucher payment of the award at that time. Funding for the award would have to come with legislative approval via the appropriations process in what is commonly referred to as the Court of Claims Special Awards Bill. The award has yet to be paid. In its motion Claimant seeks interest from July 16,1992, until the date of eventual payment.

The record in this case includes a departmental report which was compiled by Correctional Industries and offered as *prima facie*evidence of the facts contained therein pursuant to 74 Ill. Adm. Code 790.140. One of the facts contained in the report is that the invoice for the materials was not received prior to the end of the lapse *453period. Correctional Industries could not pay the invoice if it did not have it and it could not pay the invoice after the lapse period. This Court will not make an award for interest when the agency would not have been liable therefor. *(Airwork v. State*(1990), 43 Ill. Ct. Cl. 353; *Arthur Anderson & Co. v. State*(1987), 40 Ill. Ct. Cl. 195.) As for post-judgment interest, we have consistently held that such does not accrue pending legislative approval of awards. See *Centola v. State*(1988), 41 Ill. Ct. Cl. 119, and the cases cited therein.

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that the Claimants motion be, and hereby is, denied.
CDC Outreach for 

Tick-Borne Disease Prevention

• Includes IPM, though 

traditionally focused more 

on personal prevention

• New “toolkit” coming

– Trail signs, PSAs, fact sheets 

for various audiences

• Studies ongoing to better 

document IPM/household 

strategies
Challenges to Outreach for Tick IPM

• Understanding and perception of risk

– 20% of respondents in Lyme endemic areas didn’t know ticks 

spread LD near them

• Moving from knowledge to action

• Prevention options not always clear

• Fear/discomfort with methods

– Environmental effect of pesticides

– Only ~50% of respondents would use currently 

available acaricides to reduce ticks (10% were doing 

so)

– Studies suggest willingness to pay for service is <$100
Outreach Research and 

Implementation Needs

• Better understanding of barriers to household 

IPM

– Landscaping, acaricide etc

• Development of methods acceptable to 

consumers

– Multidisciplinary teams

• Use of social marketing and other strategies to 

increase movement from knowledge to action
### §4214. Trust Fund

#### (a) Establishment

There is established in the Treasury of the United States the Civil Liberties Public Education Fund, which shall be administered by the Secretary of the Treasury.

#### (b) Investment of amounts in the Fund

Amounts in the Fund shall be invested in accordance with section 9702 of title 31.

#### (c) Uses of the Fund

Amounts in the Fund shall be available only for disbursement by the Attorney General under section 4215 of this title and by the Board under section 4216 of this title.

#### (d) Termination

The Fund shall terminate not later than the earlier of the date on which an amount has been expended from the Fund which is equal to the amount authorized to be appropriated to the Fund by subsection (e), and any income earned on such amount, or 10 years after August 10, 1988. If all of the amounts in the Fund have not been expended by the end of that 10-year period, investments of amounts in the Fund shall be liquidated and receipts thereof deposited in the Fund and all funds remaining in the Fund shall be deposited in the miscellaneous receipts account in the Treasury.

#### (e) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Fund $1,650,000,000, of which not more than $500,000,000 may be appropriated for any fiscal year. Any amounts appropriated pursuant to this section are authorized to remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 100–383, title I, §104, Aug. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 905; Pub. L. 102–371, §2, Sept. 27, 1992, 106 Stat. 1167.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1989b–3 of the former Appendix to this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

1992—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 102–371 substituted "$1,650,000,000" for "$1,250,000,000".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Maximum Amount Authorized for Fund

Pub. L. 101–162, title II, Nov. 21, 1989, 103 Stat. 996, provided that: "Subject to the provisions of section 104(e) of the Civil Liberties Act of 1988 (Public Law 100–383; 50 U.S.C. App. 1989(b-3(e) [1989b–3(e)]) [now 50 U.S.C. 4214(e)], the maximum amount authorized under such section for any fiscal year is appropriated, from money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for each fiscal year beginning on or after October 1, 1990, to the Civil Liberties Public Education Fund established by section 104(a) of the Civil Liberties Act of 1988 [50 U.S.C. 4214(a)], for payments to eligible individuals under section 105 of that Act [50 U.S.C. 4215]."