R. I. 4418 APRIL 1949

UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

J. A. KRUG, SECRETARY

BUREAU OF MINES

JAMES BOYD, DIRECTOR

AY16 l94

REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS

INVESTIGATION OF POTATO MOUNTAIN TIN PLACER DEPOSITS

SEWARD PENINSULA, NORTHWESTERN ALASKA

BY

HAROLD E. HEIDE AND F. A. RUTLEDGE
R. I. 4418,

April 1949.

REPORT OF NVT3STIGATIONS.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TEE INTERIOR - BXMEAU OF MIvNES

INVESTIGATION OF POTATO MOUNTAIN TIN PLACE DEPOSITS,

SEWARD PENINSULA, NORTHWESTERN ALASKA1/.

tBy Harold E. Heide2/ and F. A. Rutledgel/

CONTENTS

Page

Introduction and summary ...... .....................

Acknowledgments .... . ... 2

Location and accessibility. . . 2

Physical features and climate .. ... 3

'History and production 4

Property and ownership ................ . 4

Water supply . . ................... . 4

Character of the deposits. . . 4

Investigations by the Bureau of Mines . ........ 5

Placer ' workings . ............... 8...

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

Although the United States has been the largest consumer of tin, only a

small quantity of tin was produced on the North American Continent during peace

times, and the deficiency was made up by foreign imports.

Because the most important sources of tin were cut off by the war with

Japan, it became necessary to increase imports from South America and Africa

and, if possible, develop domestic tin reserves. Most of the tin produced in

North America has come from the Seward Peninsula, Alaska, and a substantial

portion of this was produced from the Potato Mountain area.

Tin was first identified as occurring in the Seward Peninsula by A. H.

Brooks in 1900, when a part of heavy concentrates from Anikovik River and

Buhna Creek, one of its tributaries, proved to be stream tin.4/ His report

was given considerable publicity by the daily press, and the first steamers

north in 1901 carried a number of prospectors bound for the Seward Peninsula

to search for tin. The deposits of stream tin on Buck Creek in the Potato

Mountain area were discovered in the fall of 1901.5/

1/ The Bureau of Mines will welcome reprinting of this paper, provided the

following footnote acknowledgment is used "Reprinted from Bureau of

Mines Report of Investigations 4'41&"-

2/ Senior mining engineer, Juneau, Alaska.

3/ Mining engineer, Juneau, Alaska

IT/ Steidtmann, Edward, and Cathcart, S. E., Geology of the York Tin Deposits,

Alaska: U. S. Geol. Surv. Bull. 733, 1922, p.13.

5/ Idem. p. 14.

2744
R. I. 4418

During the succeeding years the area was reexamined several times by the

Geological Survey as a part of its program in Alaska. As a possible domestic

source of tin for the United'States, the area was examined by J. B. Mertie, Jr.,

geologist of the Geological Sukrvey in939.' ' ''

The Potato Mountain placer district produced approximately 1,500 tons of

tin concentrate prior to 1920.. Since then tin production'in the district has

been negligible.

As one of the strategic metals needed for the war industries, the Bureau

of Mines, under the Strategic Minerals Act of 1939, began investigations of

tin deposits on the Seward Peninsula. Reports that previous operators had left

an appreciable amount of tin led to an examination of the district by the senior

author in September 1942.. The possibilities of developing a moderate tonnage

of tin appeared encouraging, and a project by the Bureau of Mines was proposed.

The program of investigation was-started by the Bureau of Mines on June 20,

1943, with two bulldozers and two -placer drills.. Work continued until September

22, 1943, when all of the principal creeks of the district, except ReA Fox

Creek, were drilled.

It was necessary to do considerable prospecting with the drills. As a

result, there was not aufficient time to complete detailed drilling on the

more favorable deposits discovered.

A field party of the Federal Geological Survey worked in the area during

the program by the Bureau of Mines, and plane table maps made by the Survey

form the base for illustrations incorporated in this report.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The chemical analyses included in this report were made at Rolla, Mo.,

under the direction of C. Travis Anderson, metallurgist, Rolla Branch, Metallurgical Division.

Acknowledgment is made to the Geological Survey for the use of maps of

the deposits in the Potato Mountain area and information obtained from their

previous reports on the Seward Peninsula.

Special acknowledgment is made to Robert Coats, geologist of the Geological Survey, who was chief of party for the Survey during the cooperative

project.

LOCATION AND ACCESSIBILITY

The Potato Mountain tin placer district embraces the tin-bearing creeks

surrounding Potato Mountain. The district is in the -northwest part of the

Seward Peninsula, Alaska, at approximately 650 40' north latitude and 1670 30'

west longitude. The airline distances are 100 miles northwest of Nome, 12 miles

east of the -Cape Mountain tin placer district, 9 miles south of 'the Arctic Ocean

and 12 miles north of the Bering Sea. Location of the district is shown on

figure 1.

2744 -2-
/74 62 S

CACNNO

300 ~ ~ N

/87Lt~Fiue .- ne ma trof Alaska

<? 4 & > < =B\S~~~~~ko14 iy

Figure 1. map - Index ofAlaska.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~as
Fig.

0 /QCOO

Sco/ein Feei'

Nodof ed frolm Mos by Geo/oylcol/ &rvey

Figure 2. - Potato Mountain tin placer district.
R. I. 4418

A coastwise steamer makes two or three trips a year between Seattle and

Kotzebue during the season when the Bering Sea is open to navigation. The

first boat leaves Seattle early in June and the last boat late in August or

early in September. There is no harbor at Tin City or Wales, and ships must

anchor offshore, and cargoes are lightered ashore.

The average freight rate from Seattle to Nome is $30. a ton plus a 16-

percent surcharge. Lighterage rates at Nome are 50 percent of the Seattle-Nome

freight rates.

Supplementary coastwise service is provided by the mail boat, a small

motor schooner scheduled to make biweekly trips between St. Michael, Nome,

Wales, and Kotzebue. The schooner will also tow a barge from Nome to these

villages and way points when cargoes Justify. Freight rates by this method

from Nome to York are about $30 a ton, shore to shore.

Prior to 1920, Buck Creek was reached by a wagon road from York near

Anikovik River on the Bering Sea. The road is now impassable but could be

repaired at a moderate cost. Tin City was used as a base during the Bureau

of Mines' investigation, with transportation by means of tractors and go-devils.

The Bureau of Mines leveled a small airfield near the lower dredge on

Grouse Creek. The field is short and suitable only for small planes.'

PHYSICAL FEATURES AND CLIMATE

Potato Mountain consists of a series of hills 1,200 to 1,400 feet in altitude trending southwest and culminating in a peak bearing the name. The

principal tin-bearing creeks heading in the low-lying hills are divided into

two drainage systems. Grouse, Buck, Sutter, Iron, Left Fork, and Peluk Creeks

are included in the southeast system; Potato, Diomede, and Red Fox Creeks flow

northwest into the Arctic Ocean. The location of the principal creeks is shown

on figure 2. These creeks are short, the valleys narrow, the water shallow,

and the bedrock gradient steep near their heads.

No timber is available in the region, not even enough scrub willows to

provide firewood. The tundra furnishes an abundant supply of moss, which is

a suitable feed for reindeer but of little value for otfher stock.

Land animals once were plentiful, but at present the numbers have been

greatly reduced. Only an occasional rabbit, ptarmigan, fox, or bear is seen.

The partly domesticated herds of reindeer have been greatly depleted in recent

years.

The climate of the region is Arctic. High winds from the north or south

bring much fog and rain during the summer. Weather conditions at' Potato Mounttain are'similar to those at Nome, where the nearest weather station is located.

The records at Nome show an average annual precipitation of 12.29 inches. Over

half of the rain falls during the 4 summer months, or from June to September,

inclusive. The annual mean temperature is 30.20 F. Winters are severe, and

temperatures of -400 F. are recorded frequently.

2744 - 3-
R. I. 4418

The ice pack on the Bering Sea stops navigation from early November to

'late June.

Most of the unconsolidated material under the tundra it frozen throughout

the.year and must be thawed before placer mining can be undertaken.

HISTORY AND PRODJCTION

Placer mining for tin started on Buck Creek in 1901 and continued until

- :1920. About 324 tons of concentrate containing 50 percent tin was produced

in the earlier years by hand placer-mining methods. The York Dredging Co.

commenced dredging operations on Buck Creek in 1911. The American Tin Co.

started dredging on Buck Creek in 1915. Since 1911 the dredges recovered

*lj194 tons:of concentrate containing 68 percent tin. Small, scattered, highgrade'.tin placer deposits on the upper creeks of the'southeast slope of Potato

Mountain were worked by ground sluicing methods.-

PROPERTY AND OWNERSHIP

Claim titles were not investigated, but it is reported that J. S. Ramstad,

320 N 175th Street, Seattle, Wash., and associates control many of'the placer

claims on Grouse and.Buck Creeks and their tributaries. It is also reported

* that Ramstad has leased his placer claims to 0lifford Smith of Fairbanks, Alaska.

Mrs. T. A. Peterson of Teller, Alaska, located several claims on Potato Creek

in 1943.'

WATER SUPPLY

The flow of water is too variable during and between seasons to make a

reliable estimate of the quantity of water flowing in'the creeks 'of the area,

In September 1942, Buck Creek above Sutter Creek was nearly dry. It was re-

'ported that the upper'dredge on Buck Creek was at times short of water for

floating. According to prospectors who had hand mined on Buck, West Fork,

Left Fork, and Iron Creeks,.a sufficient supply 'df water was present only during the spring. thaw and after each rain. To avoid' interruption of' mining operation, which would result in lower production and higher mining costs, it would

be necessary to bring water to some of the deposits from the Junction of, Buck

and Sutter Creeks. This water could be impounded and recirculated at the deposits. On deposits farthest from the junction of-these creeks it would be

judicious to plan a schedule of mining to conform with the periods of abundant

water during the spring thaw.'

CHARACTER OF SHE DEPOSITS'

On the southeast side of Potato Mountain the bedrock is slate, whereas on

the northwest side both slate and conglomerate bedrock are found. Quartz veins

that range from a fraction of an inch to a few Inches in width are found almost

everywhere in the 'area. It is believed that the cassiterite found in the placer

deposits of the area came from these quartz veins.f/ However, no lode tin deposits. of commercial -grade have been'found in the artea.

6/: op. "Cit., pp. 89-90.

2744 :- 4 -
R. I. 4418

The tin-bearing portions of the creek gravels in the Potato Mountain area,

like those of Cape Mountain, are too small to represent any large reserve of

tin.i/ The gravels have been mined, and deposits that remain were apparently

left for economic reasons. Small tin-bearing areas left along the sides of

old dredge and sluice channels and unworked low-grade portions of the creeks

contain the known tin reserves of the district. The few deposits found by the

Bureau of Mimes are small and widely separated. If mining was undertaken, considerable operating time would be' lost and considerable expense would be involved in the movement of equipment from one deposit to another.

The deposits average 40 tol100-feet in width, 3 to 13 feet in depth, and

500 to 3,000 feet in length. Distances between deposits range from 600 to

4,000 feet.

Most of the areas are covered with an overburden of tundra, slide rock,

ice, and muck. The term "muck," as used by the Alaska Placer Miners, refers

to materials 'compos'ed of decayed organic matter, silt, clay, and some sand.

The gravel is generally frozen, but is otherwise uncemented. It is fairly

well washed, contains few boulders over 1 foot in diameter, and only a small

amount'of clay.

Although tin concentration is generally on or near bedrock, Bureau of

Mines drilling indicates that tin concentrate does not penetrate far into the

slate cleavages. Bedrock gradients range from 2 to 6 percent.

Tin in the placer deposits is found in small, slightly rounded cassiterite

grains with a sparse occurrence of muggets. The particle size ranges from

about 0.025 inch up to 0.2 inch in diameter. A high percentage of fines

occur in the concentrate on Grouse Creek.

Small amounts of hematite, magnetite, and pyrite generally are found in

all rough concentrates. Considerable hematite and magnetite are associated

with the cassiterite on Grouse, lower Buck, and Iron Creeks.

Bureau of Mines drilling shows the presence of gold with the tin concentrates on Buck Creek in the vicinity of Sutter Creek and West Fork. A few

holes show a higher content, but it is estimated that the general average gold

content will not exceed $0.05 a cubic yard in value;

INVESTIGATIONS BY THE BUREAU OF MINES

The plAcer deposits were sampled by churn-drill holes and trenches. Two

hundred fifty-six-holes were drilled, totaling 2,880 feet. When possible- -all

drill holes were spaced at 50foot intervals on 'lines across the tin-bearing

deposits at right angles to the valley. The distanc'e between lines'was normally

500 feet. The purpose of the work was'tb determine the possible extent of the

deposit up and down the valleys as well as the width.

7/ Heide, Harold E., and Sanford, Robert S., Investigation of Cape Mountain

Tin Placer'Deposits, Seward Peninsula, Alaska: Bureau of Mines Rept.

of Investigations 4418.

2744 5
R. I. 4418

The. holes are numbered according to.their location with respect to the

center line of. thevalley. Facing downstream, the right. side is Ieferred to

as the "right limit" and the left side as the "left limit." The prefix to the

hole numbers, L. L. (left limit). and R. L. (right limit) are used on all figures.

Location of the drill holesia shown on figures 3 to 7, inclusive.

On Buck and Grouse Creeks,.where' the gravel was previously mined by dredging, drill holes and'drill lines were-spaced with the object of locating tin-

'bearing areas along the margins of the mined section of the creek.

Two airplate-type churn drills wete used - one a 4-inch drill using casing

with a drive-shoe cutting area 0.150 square foot, and the other a 5-inch drill

using casing with a drive-shoe cutting area of 0.230 square foot.

In. thawed ground the length of core in the casing was-measured before and

after each pumping. Loose volumes.from each pumping were measured in calibrated

buckets. Open holes were drilled in frozen ground, and water measurements were

made to determine the size of the holes. Logs were kept at the drill by the

drillers, frequent checks being made by the sample foreman.

Preliminary panning was done by skilled Eskimo panners at the drills. A

high recovery was obtained on a low-grade concentrate. Final cleaning of the

concentrate was done by the sample foreman, wholalso panned the tailing to see

that no tin was lost.

Two average-tin analyses of the concentrate from each creek were obtained

by segregating the concentrate samples from all holes on a creek into two composite samples. Segregation was based on weights; those samples weighing between 4 and 15 grams were segregated into one composite, and those above 15

grams were segregated into a second composite.

In applying the two average analyses, they were first reduced to a single

average by weighing, the percentage of tin in the 4- to 15-gram composite sample against the percentage of tin in. the 15 or more gram weights. (See table

1.) The percentages determined by this method were used when calculating the

drill logs.

TABLE 1. - Tin analysis of composite concentrate of placer samples

(Analysis at Bureau of Mines Laboratory, Rolla, Mo.)

Weighted

Tin, average, tin

Source of sample 'percent. percent

Buck Creek (Grouse to Sutter) L 12 to L 16,

Composite of samples between 15 to 4 gramœ ........ 65.70

Buck Creek (Grouse to Sutter) L 12 to L 16, 65.52

Composite of samples& over 15 grams * * -65.50 . . -

Buck Creek (Sutter to Left Fork) L 17'to L'4,.

Composite of samples'between 15 to 4 grams ........ 52.52

Buck Creek (Sutter to Left Fork) L 17 to L 24,. . 55.42

Composite of samples over 15 grams ................ 55.60

2744 -6 -
NJ~ ~ ~ ~~~N

Le gend

Limi's of DredgVd Ore/

0 400/0co \in 

.Sco/e#inFrrw,/

4~~~~~~4

/ drm 4why 6eakqwal Survey

Figure 3. -Drill-hole map of Grouse and Buck Creeks.
/<c</wBLc/~~or,~'

es/Qlw''>-desz3 -

--Limis - of'Cy-ri e

*~~~h /c.k. OC(

\X\X5~~10-

L cnd Lln\ 20 / C~~~~~~~~Z~ 7iCE

Fiueo. Drill Hl-.oempo ukadSte res

niti ~jof Dredgedl Ormelc -- Limits of Re aerKsz 20

L _~~~~~~~~~~~~L~

IWoO'lledfirOln AAaahwy e-oyr,1O1 5Ur vey \\ {

Figure 4. - Drill-hole map of Buck and Sutter Creeks.
LEGEND

BLOK i \-- L imits of Reserve5

*- Drill H}/es

ei (

0 /000

/ /< t Scale ,a Feet

I \) LIMITS 1EFT L/AI/P5 

~~~~0 - C A~~~~~~~~

RIOH/T LIMIT5 \ f

Al, from 7ed A4.5 , by 6eo/o1VcO/ S5rvey

Figure 5. - Drill-hole map of Sutter and Iron Creeks.
LI

i \~ ~ 'tL/nc36 ~~~~~ $/,

.ef" Limi ti5 \

-4 -.4 -ci- 00

L~egend °/£

* DrI// ho/u/

Limn's of Drmged A/ /w

__iimifs of Reeserves

0 /000

Scole In Feet

Iloddfed from Ain 4y 6e0/oQco/ survey

Figure 6. - Drill-hole map of Buck, West Fork, and

Peluck Creeks.
Poto~e Crock 1 .F LMT

9,6 4'/-I/T i LIMITS

eve:> /<<~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-Lm5 <f Pe erves

oomed Creek o 5ca/e Žn Feet

Aodified rksow Aroof by 6ecohgmcc/ ...5&rvey

Figure 7. - Drill-hole map of Potato Creek and Diomede Creek.
P. I. 4418

TABLE 1. - Tin Analysis of composite concentrate of placer samples (Cont'd.)

(Anal rbis at Bureau off Mines Laboratory, Rolla, Mo.)

Weighted

Tin, average, tin

Source of sample percent percent

Buck Creek (Left Fork and& UpL 2.5 to L 38j -

Composite of samples between 15 to 4 grams. 56.32.

Buck Creek (Left Fork and. Up) L 25 to L 38, *58.64

Composite of samples over 15 grams . .. ........ .59.30

West Fork

Composite of samples between. 15. to .4 grams......... 5.60

West Fork a 56.97

Composite of samples over 15 grams ....... ..... 58.62

Iron Creek

Composite of samples between 15 to 4 grams . .50.80

Iron Creek 57.40

Composite of samples over 15 grams ....... ,,......., 59.87

Grouse Creek

Composite of samples between 15 to 4 grams ... ,, 53.17

Grouse Creek 56.95

Composite of- samples over 15 grams . 57.25

Sutter Creek L 1 to L 15

Composite of samples between 15 to 4 grams . 63.00

Sutter C.eek L 1 to L 15 - 64.65

Composite of samples over 15 grams ............ . 67.57

Peluk Creek L 1

Composite of samples above 15 grams .............. 53.55

Peluk Creek L 1 53.46

Composite of samples between 4 to 15 grams .........

Potato Creek

Composite of samples between 4 to 15 grams ...... . 45.42

Diomede Creek

Composite of samples between 4 to 15 grams .......... 35.35

Formulas as used in calculating the churn drill holes are as follows:

(Weight of ccncentreptp, ,n gram) (Q.,0595)(peroont tin in concentrate) Pound of

eolm of horizon -' = tin per

;(Vo'une of pay horizon) cubic yard.

27 = 0

75-3-6 .0595

where- 27 number of cubic feet in a cubic yard

453.6 = number of grams in 1 pound avoirdupois.

2744 - 7 -
R. I,-;4418 ..

The. percent tin in concentrate is the weighted average of-the composite

samples of concentrate between 4 to 15.grams and samples over 15 grams.

The pay horizon. .(.P.. R),,) is the vertical section of each drill hoi616'n

which-tin concentrate was found.

The term mining section (M. S.) is used to designate the material in the

vertical section of. each.drill hole thatwould be sluiced to obtain an efficient recovery of tin concentrate. The mining'.section, iAn this case, includes

all the gravel ahd a min1jm. of 1 foot.-of*.bedrock.-

The grade of the mining section for each drill hole was calculated as

follows:

(Depth of pay horizon).(pounds of tindper cubic yard in pay horizon) .P o

(Depth of mining section) tin per

cubic yard

(M. S.)

Where casing was used, the area of the drive shoe was used to calculate

volumes. No adjustments of thaued volumes to frozen volumes were made.' Water

measured volumes were used for calculating frozen holes.

In all cases, the overburden was estimated separately from the.gravel and

bedrock. The tabulations of drilling results are given in tables 2 to 9,

inclusive.

In conjunction with the drill sampling, six trenches were bulldozed to

bedrock and sampled. T-ble 10 is a summary of the results from trench

sampling.,

PLACER WORKINGS

Grouse Creek wae dredged from the mouth of Buck Creek downstream to East

Fork, a distance of about 5,000 feet. immediately below East Fork; a reef

extending across Grouse Creek apparently acted as a trap, as no tin concentrationm was fouhd belqw thia reef.

The dredges worked about 15,000 feet of Buck Creek from its mouth to West

Fork. Five small deposits were left alongside the dredge channel.

A 1,500-foot section of Iron Creek was hand-mined in.a.narrow strip up

the center of the present channel. Very little tin was left.

Left Fork was hand-mined from its mouth 600 feet upstream. A narrow,.

shallow bench on the left limit of the worked portion was previously tested by

Thcmas J. Christensen, a local operator. Very little gravel and only traces

of tin now exist above the mined ground on Left Fork.

West Fork was hand-mined up the present channel 900 feet above its mouth.

A small bench still remains on the left limit, and a low-grade deposit exists

above the workings.

2744 -8-
R. I. 4418

TABLE 2. - Summary of drilling results on Grouse Creek (fig. 3)

. . Bedrock Pound

Total Over- . Pay mining Mining concentrate per Pound tin per Thawed

depth, burden, Gravel, horizon, -ec., section, cubic yards, cubic yards, or

Line No. Hole No. feet- feet feet feet feet feet mining section mining section frozen

5 ... ......... 1 (L.L.) 9.0 2.0 5.0 36.0o 0.072 0.04 Th.-

1 (R.L.) 5.0 0.0 40 3-.0 1.0 5-0 0.085 0.05 Th. .. 2 10.0 0.0 8.0 4..o 1. 0- 9.0 0.201 0.11 Th.

3 6.o 1.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 5.0 0.348 0-.20 Th.

7 . ..... 1 6.o 3.0 2.0 1.5 1.0 3.0 0.028 0.02 Fr.

8.1....... 2 (R.L.) 8.0 2.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 5.0 0.167 0.10 Fr.

(R:L:) 7.0 2:0 . . .050o.6 0.09Fr 3(R.L.) 8,Q 1.0 5.5 3.0 1.0 6.5 0.056 0.03 Th.

4 (R.L.) 6.o l.o 4.0 1.0 l.o 5.0 0.004 Trace Th.

5 (R.L.) 11.0 2.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.000 0.00 Fr.

9 ;1 9.0...... 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 5.0 0.602 0.34 Fr.

IX 7.01 33.0 .0 2.0 1O 4.0 0.035 0.02 Fr.

.2 6.o 2;0 3.0 3.0 1.0 4.0 0.028 0.01 Fr.

3 8.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 1.0 4.0 0.073 0.04 Fr.

8.. .... 1 (L.L.) 14.o 5,0 7.0 5.0 1.0 8.0 1.675 0.95 Fr.

10 . . 2 (L.L.) 17.0 6.o0 9.0 o .0 1.0 . 2.699 1.53 Fr. . 1 (L.L.), 13.0 4.0 7..05 7.0 5 .70r.

.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. 10 . ...... 1 (R;L.) 8.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 1.0 4.0 0.975 0.55 Fr.

2 (R.L.) 9.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 4.0 0.030 0.02 Fr.,

1 ..... .. 1 10.0 3.0 6.o 6.o 1.0 7.0 1.573- 0.89 Fr. .... .. 2. . 2 13.5 3.0 8.0 10.0 2.0 10.0 0.854 o.46 Fr.

3_ 35 1. 5.5 4.5 1.0 6.5 0.005 Trace Fr.

2744 9
R. I. 4418

TABLE 3. - Summary of drilling results on Buck Creek (figs. 3 and 4)

Bediock Pound

Total Over- Pay mining mining concentrate per Pound tin per Thawed

depth, burden, Gravel, horizon, sec., section, cubic yards, cubic yards, or Line No. Hole No. feet feet - feet feet feet feet mining section mining section frozen

12 ......... .. 1 4.0 4.0 5.0 1.0 5.0 1.373 0.90 Fr.

2 7.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 0.053 0.03 Fr.

13. , 1 ; 9.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 5.0 0.589 0.38 Th.

2 9.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 5.0 0.060 0.04 Fr.-

13+. . .. 1 l.O 6.o 3.5 3.0 1.0 4.5 3-311 2.17 Fr.

14 .. 1 8.o 5.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.000 0,00 Fr.

14+ .. 1 7.o 4.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 0.075 0.05 Th.

15 ... 1 6.o 3.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 0.206 0.13 Fr.

15-1 .1-. 3 8.o 3.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 5.0 o.188 0.12 Fr.

2 6.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 30 0.451 0.29 Fr. -. 1 7.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 4.0 0.319 0.21 Fr.

15-2 . 2 10.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 1.0 4.0 0.188 0.12 Th. 1 8.o 4.0 3.0 4.0 1.0 4.o 2.539 1.66 Fr.

16 ....... 6 13.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 5.0 0.131 0.08 Fr.

5. 9.0 3O. 2.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 1.316 0.86 Fr.

4 8.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 4.0 0.583 0-38 Fr. 3 9.0 3.0 5.0 4.0 l.o 6.0 1.655 1.08 Fr.

2 8.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 1.0 6.o 8.146 5.34 Fr.

1__ 9.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 1.0 5.0 1.223 0.80 Fr.

2744 -10-
R. I. 4418

TABLE 3. - Summary of drilling results on Buck Creek (fig. 4)(Cont'd.)

Bedrock Pound

Total Over- Pay mining Mining concentrate per Pound tin per Thawed

.irid . ole ............. depth, burden, Gravel, horizon, sec., section, cubic yards, cubic yards, or

LinsNo HoleNo. feet feet feet feet feet feet mining section mining section frozen

17-1 . . 2 10.0 5.0. 3.0 3.0 1.0 4.0 1.261 0.70 Fr.

1 8.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 5.0 2.822 1.56 Th.

17 . .. 3 11.0 7.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 0.338 0.19 Fr.

2 11.5 3.0 8.o 8.o 1.0 9.0 1.618 o.89 Fr.

. . 1 7.5 2.0 5.5 4.5 1.0 6.5 8.786 4.87 Th.

18 .1 (L.L.) 14.0 6.o 5.5 5.0 1.0 6.5 *2.991- 1.66 m.

1 (R.L.) 8.0 4.o 2.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 0.470 0.26 Fr.

2 (L.L.) 13.0 4.0 8.0 .3.0 1.0 9.0 0.263 0.14 Fr.

20 (R.L.) ...... 1 9.0 0.0 7.0 3.0 1.0 8.o 0.263 m . .0.14 

2 10.0 4.0 4 5 5.0 1.0 -45 0.602 0.33 Fr.

3 8.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 4.0 0.339 0.19 Fr.

20 (L.L.) . .. 3 .-7.O- 5.0 -. 0. 0.0 0.0 0.000 0.00 Fr.

-.. .2 11.5 5.o 4.0 3.4 1.0 5.0 7.413 4.11 Fr.

:1, 9.5 4.o,- 4.0 4.Q 1.0 5.0 5-.324 .2.95 Th.

21 . . .. 1 13.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 1.0 8.o o.639 0.35 Fr.

-2. 13.0 .3.0 7.0 4.0 1.0 8.o 0.52'7 0.29 Fr.

21+. 1 15.0 9.0 4.0 5.0 1.0 5.0 0.809 0,.45 Fr.

Z 2 16.0 5.0 8.0 0.0 -8. 0.000 0.00 Fr.

2 .. 1 18.0 4,0 12.0 5.0 1.0- 13.0 4.910 2.72 Fr.

2 15.0o 4.0 9.0 4.0 1.0 10.0 0.903 0.50 Fr.

23.t.- 1 9.0 .>,,>:, 5.0 2.5 3.0 1.0 3.5 .17.139 9.50 Fr. 23.- .2 6~~~~~~~~00 i.0 2.0' 10 30 8.8~* 4.90 Fr.

31" 8 fi0 3 ,1 - 5 ;4 1 8 6. ° 0.o 0 1 j Th .

: 4 10.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 G.000 - . 0.00 Fr.

2744 -11-
R. I. 4418

TABLE 3. -BSummary of drilling results on Buck Creek (figs. . and 6)(cont'd.) 1 - .

'Bedrock, Pound

Total Over- Pay mining Mining concentrate per Pound tin per Thawed

depth, burden, Gravel, horizon,, sec., section, cubic yards, cubic yards, or Line No... Hole No. feet feet feet feet feet feet nmining section mining section froien

23+ .. . 1 10.0 4.0 4 4. 4.0 1.0 5.0 7.770 4.31 Th. 2 9.0 5.0 2.0. 2.0 1.0 3.0 0.376 0.21 Fr.

24.............,ct 1 7.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.000 0.00 Th.

_______ ______ ______Tin Creek_ _ _ _

1 . .;rl1 . r 3.0 i 6.0 ______jX] ° - ° 1-____T_ I __ Th_-

TABLE 3. - Sumnary of drilling r sults on Buck Creek (figs. 4 and 6)(Cont'd.)

25. . ... 1 13.0 7.5 3.5 3.0 I 1.0 4.5 5.441 3.19 Fr. 2 16.0 8.5 4.5 3.0 1 1.0 5.5 1.037 0.61 Fr.- 3 11.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 1.0 6.0 0.200 0.12 Fr.-

26.:.^............ .1 10.0 0.0 6.o 5.0 1.0 7.0 o.637 0.37 Th. .2 

.3 . 13.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1.0 6.0 o0.40 0.23 Th. 7.0 3.5 1.5 2.5 1.0 2.5 0.400 0.23 Fr.

27. ......... 1 8.o 1.0 4.o 4.o l.Q 5.0 1.310 0.77 Th. 2 7.5 2.0 3.5 3.5 1.0 4.5 0.709 0.41 Fr. 3 10.0 2.0 5.0 4.o 1.0 6.0 0.218 0 .13 Fr.

28 , . 1 9.5 .4.0 3. 3.5. 2.0 5.5 3.620 2.32 Fr.

2 18.0 3.0 13.0 10.0 1.0 14.0 0.182 0.11 Fr.

2 8 + 1... 14.0 7.0. 4.o0 4.0 1.0 5. 0 1.383 - 0.81 : Fr.

2 9.- 1 , l.- 12.o 6.0' 3.0' 3.0 1.0 4.0 0.910 0.53- r.

30- ............. 8.o 4.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 0.044 0.02 Fr.

30 .... 1 (R.L.) 9.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.000 0.00 Fr. 30........... 2 (R.L.) 8.0 3.5 1.5 2.5 1.0 2.5 0.228 0.13 Fr.

2744 - 12 -
R. 4418 I. ~~~TABI 3.-...SunnarY of drilling, resultS. on ~Buck Creek. (fige.' 4 -4nd 6(onti:'d..4..-

I 'Bed~~~~~~~~~~~oek~~M, *--- pendTh

Total Over- Pay mnin Miniing concenitrate per Pound"tn pe djhWed.

dphbuirden, Gravel, horizon, see., Section, cui ard~s cubic yards, or

Line No. .ERole No. feet feet f ee't feet feaet feet minin 'section mining'- sectionl frZen

31- . .. 1 ~~~~ ~~~~~9.0 4.5 2.5 2.5, 1.0 { .2 .36

31 .... ... 2 50 25 . 3O. 0.8

10.,O o~~~~~~~~~~.455,&683r'

32 .... 7.5 3.0 30 3510 4.0 0.135 'O. 68Fr

34 i.... ~~~~3 (L.L.), 8.5 4.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 300.4515 0.269

2(L.L.). 10.0 Ž5 2.2.5 1.0 3.5

.1(L. L.) 6'o 2.0` 2.5 3.0 1.0 .3.5 280 f 165 r

1 (R.L.) 4..5 0- 3.0 4.0o 1.0 4.0O 4 '986 292 M.m

-2 (R.L.)~ 8.0O 4.0 2.0 2~0 10 30 .01 .Q

35.'.'.,. ... (L. L.> Yi0 U45 2.-5 2.0 1. -5 ,-7 o0:63 r

1.(L.L.),j 11:.0. 4.5 2.5 4.5 2.0 I4.5 3.221 1.:89 A:r

1(R.L Y -,%0o 5.0 2.-5 -3:0 I.0 3:5 :710 1.00 'Fr.

~~ (R.L.)!~ 8..' 50 1.0 2.0 0,345 0.2.0 Fr'.

J2BY'3. - 'Summary,-Of rilling resultsq on Buck Creek (fig. 6)

3.6 ~ ~ ~ (L.L.) 5.0 9.0 40.0 10 5.0 0.364 02 r

2(L.L.): 14.0 . 6.5 4.0 1.0 7.5 .7-09 0.41Fr

-. ~~~L ~(L.L.)t &..O 5'.0 '0c.5 2.0 ]11.5 .2.0 1 '073 0.63 Th'.

1.(R.L.) 6. '. .5 .1.0 l.aO 1.5 0.473 0.2P8 Th.

3TW.0 ....... I6 21-.PO lli.0 5-.0 3.0 1'.0 6.0 o.618 0.36

' 5 19~~~~i.0 1.0 6.0o. 1.0 7.0 3.071.79Fr

* Af'~~~~ . 1~&. O 1. '.' . 1-. 0 5e0 '361167 -r

-43~ 6.0 3.0 4.04 .0 2. 30.6 .6Fr.'

1 .4. -. 0 t~c2. 40 23 4.-0l 2.8216 h

38 ....... . 2 iSXI"~~~~~~~~ 2 3. ''O ~ ~ 5.3 . Fr.

_______ ~~6.0 a____ 0.0 0. 0.0 0000.00 Fr.

2744 -13-
R. I. 4418

TABLE 4. - Summary of drilling results on West Fork (fig, 6)

Bedrock, Pound

Total Over- Pay mining Mining concentrate per Pound tin per Thaved.

depth, burden, Gravel, horizon, sec., section, cubic yards, cubic yards, or

Line No. Hole No. feet feet feet feet feet feet mining section mining section frozen

2.... 2.. 9.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 j 4.0 0.181 0.10 Fr.

L 9.0 5.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 0.617 0.34 mT

3 ...... 2 9.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 I 1.0 4.0 Om076 0.04 Fr.

6.o 2.0 2.5 3.0 1.0 3.5 o.608 0.35 Fr.

4.. .............. 5 16.0 9.0 3.5 5.0 1.5 5.0 1.312 0.75 Fr.,

4 12.0 10.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 1.456 0.97 Th.

3 10.0 7.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 0.855 0.49 Fr.

2 6.o 3.0 1.0 '2.0 1.0 2.0 2.947 1.68 Th.

1 6.o o0. 4,o 1.0 1.0 5.0 0.124 0.07 Th.

5 ..;.... 7.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 0.988 0.85 Fr.-

3 7.0 4.0 1.0 2.0 1.O 2.0 10.494 5.98 Th..

2 4.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 4..O 0.361 0.20 Th.

1 4.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.000 0.00 Th.

6....: ......... 26. 50 10.5 I1.0 2.0

6.5 5-0. 1.0 1.5 0.551 0.31 Th. . 1 4.0 0.0 3.0 3°0 1.0 4.0 0.095 0.05 Th..

7 ... ..... 1 14.0 7.0 3.0 3.0 I 1.0 4.0 1.045 0.59 Th.

2 16.0 9.0 3P.& 4;0 1.0 4.0 3.612 2.06 Fr.

3 15.0 10.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 1.065 o.61 Fr.

8..... ... . . 1.(L.L.) 15.0 7.0 6.o 5.0 1.0 7.0 0.551 0.31 Th.

1 (R.L.) 16.0 8.o 6.0 6.o 1.0 7.0 5.019 2.-86 Fr.

.2 - 11.0 16.0 3.5 4.o 1.0 4.5 .551 0.31r

9................ 2 21.0 |15.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 5.0 0.247 o.14 Th.

1 (L.L.) 17.0 |10.0 5-0 - 5.0 1.0 6. 2.528 -1.44 Th.

- 1 (R.L.-) 17.0 | 9O I 7.0 6.o 1.0 8.0 o 0.133 0.07 Th.

2744 -14 -

. .. . .~~~~a
R. i. 4418

TABLE 5.-Sunuary of drilling results on Iron Creek (fig. 5)

Bedrock, Pound 1Tad

depth, burden, ~Gravel, horizon, seec.) section, cubic yards, cubic yards, or

Line No. Role No. feet feet feet feet feetj feet mining section mining section frozen

L.............. 1 6.o . 1.0 2.0 1.0 1 2.0 1:446 0.83 .

2 6.0 .2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 0.26015 Fr.

2# ,...... . 1 j12.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Trace Trace Th.

2 10.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 5.0 0.704 0.40 Th.

3 9.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Trace Trace Fr.

3.......1 9.0 6.0o 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Trace Trace Fr.,

2 12.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Trace Trace Fr.

4 ~~~~1 10.0 3.0 4.5 3.0 1.0 5.5 0.418 0.24 Fr.

2 13.0 4.o 5.0 5.0 1.0 6.0 0.780 o.45 Fr.

3 17.5 3.0 10.0 '6.0 1.0 11.0 0.100 0.6 Fr.

5.*.... ...... 2 (R.L.) 17.0 3.0 9.0 0.0 0.0. Trace Trace Fr.

1 (R.L.) 11.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 1.0 5.0 1.769 1.01 Th.

1 10.0 3.0 5.5 3.0 1.0 6.5 0.270 0.15 Th.

2 11.0 4.0 5.0 3.0 1.0 6.0 0.209 0.12 Th.

* 3 15..5- 5.0 7.0 8.0 1.0 8.0 1.560 0.89 Fr.

4 18.0 10.0O 5.0 5.0 1.0 ..6.0 2.302 -1.32- .,.Fr.

5 20.0~ 5.0 9.0 ~9.0 .1.0 1.O.0 0.155 .0.09 .

6.40 .... ... 1 (R.L.) 12.0 I3.0 '6.0 5.0 .1.0 '.7.0 .0.190 .0.11 Fr.

1 (LL. X1.0 3.0 6.o -5.0 107.0 0'.533 .0.30 Fr.

* 2 j 17.0; 3.0 9-0 10.0- 1.0 10 - i- 503- ~ 086Fr

3' 19:.0 j 2.0 13.0 ~ 0.00.0 TceraeFr..

7_.............. 1 1 14 .ok 4.0 8.0 68.0 1.0 .9.0 1.522 0M8 'Fr..

2744 -15-
R. I. 4418

TABLE 6. - Summary of drilling results on Peluk Creek (fig. 6)

Bedrock, Pound.

Total Over- Pay mining Mining concentrate per Pound tin per Thawe&d

depth, burden, Gravel, horizon, sec., section, cubic yards, cubic yards, or

Line No. Hole No. feet feet feet feet feet feet' mining section mining section frozen

1..... . 4 : 18.Q 13.0 3.0 4.0 1.0 4.0 1.443 0.77 Th.

3 - 7.Q 3.0 2.5. 3.0 1.0 3.5 0.415 0.22 Th.

2 7.0 0.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 0.079 0.04 Th.

1 9.0- 7,0: . 1.0. .0 1.0 I 2.0' 0.020 0.01 Th.

. :..;.. . . .. .:

- - _ -4 

274 .- . 16-..... 

. .~~~~~~~~~~~~~
p .4418

TABLE 7. -Summary of drilling results on Sutter Creek (figs. 4 and5

- I I ~~~~~~Bedrock,, Pound

Tot4l Ovoer- Pay mining Mining concentrate per Pound tin per Thawed

depth, burden, Gravel, horizon,' see., 'section, cubic yards, cubic yards, or

Line No. . Hole No. feet feet feet feet feet feet mining section mining section frozen

1-S ..... ..... 1 7.0 14.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.000 0.00 Fr.

2.1 6..o ~~~~~~~~~0.0 50 3-,b 1.0 6' 0 0.0o76 0,05 Th,

2 6.0o 0..0 5.0 .7o 1. 0 6.0 0O.057 0..04 Tb.-

3 8.0 3.5 1.5 3.5 2.0 3.5 0.171 0.11 Th.

.4 10.,0 5,.0 3.5 4.0 1. 0 .4.5 0'.361 0-.23 Fr-.

5 9.0 4..0 3.5 ~~~~~4.5 1.0 4. 0..476 0-.31 Fr.

4 ........... .. 1 7-.0 6. 0 0.0 0- 0.0 o0.ooo 0.00 Th,

2 .9-.Z 00 o*o 8.0 3..6 1.0 9.0 0..228 Q..15 T.

3 ~~~8.0 0.0 5.0 4.0 1.0 6.0 0O.019 0.01 Th.,

4 ~~~10. 0 4. 0 .4.0 .0 1.0 5..0 0.03 O_0 T'

5 ~~~7.0O 2.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 .00.951 06 b

6 8.0 2.0 3.0 3,0 1.0 4.0 0.361 0I.23 Fr.

8 7.0 2.0 .3.0 3.0 1.0 4.0 0.0o76 0.05 Fr..

5...... . . 1 7.0 0.~~~~O'0 6.0o . 1.0 7'.0 0.019 0-.01 "Th.

2 10.0 1.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0*.000 0.00 Fr,.

3 8.0 2.0 3.0 3. l.0 4.0 . 0.019 0'.01 Th.

4 ~~~7. 0 2.0 ~3.0 3.0 1'.0 4.0 o.8180.5 Fr.

s 8.00 2'.0 4. . 0 1.0 5.5 0.932 06 r

6.- .. 7,0.,Q 3.0 3.0. 0 0~ . 4.0O 0.038 0. 02 Fr'

7 li.0 -2.0 .70 4.0 1.0 0003002F.

6...... ....... 1 10.0 4.0. 5.0 3.0 1, 0 6.0 Trace Trace Fr.

2 ~~~10.0 3.0 5.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 -Txc rc r

3' 12.0 *4.0- 5.9 4-O 1.0 6.' - 0038 . 00

4 ~~~150.0 14.0 9.o.x.06. .5109 Fr.

5 17.0 5.0 10.0 2.0 1.01 U1.0 0.095 m.0 Fr.

6 14.0- 4.0 8.2 3. 0 1.0 9.0- 0.057 00 r

2744 -17 -
R. I. 4418

TABLE 7. - Summary of drilling results on Sutter Creek (fig. 5)

Bedrock, Pound 1

Total Over- Pay mining Mining concentrate per Pound tin per Thawed

depth, burden,- Gravel, horizon, sec., section, cubic yards, cubic yards, or

Line No. Bole No. feet feet feet feet feet feet mining section mining section frozen

8 . ......... 2 10.0 3.0 3.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 0.342 0.22 Fr.

3 10.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.000 0.00 Th.

4 10.0 3.0 4.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 0.209 0.01 Fr.

5 12.0 3.0 7.0 4.0 1.0 8.o 0.285 0,18 Th.

6 13.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 L.O 8.0 0.342 0.22 Fr.

7 14.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 1.0 6.o 0.019 0.01 Fr. 8 10.0 4.o 3.0 -0.0 o.o Trace Trace Fr.

9............ 1 7.0 0.o 6.o 0.0 0.0 Trace Trace Th.

10............ 1 9.0 3.0 3.0 00.0 0.0 o0.00 Th.

11... ........ .1 6.o 3.0 1.0 1.0 l.o 2.0 0.171 0.11 Th.

2 6.o1 3-o 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Trace Trace Fr. . 3 7.0 3.0 2. 0 3.0 I 1.0 3.0 0.133 0.08 Fr.

4 9.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 0.152 0.10 Fr. .5 6.o 3.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 0.323 0.21 Th.

13 .... .... 1 6.o 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Trace Trace Th.

2 8.o 3.0 3.0 0 0 0. 00 0.000 0.00 Fr.

3 6.o 3.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00.000 0.00 Fr.

14 ........... .... 1 11.0 4.0 3.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 0.418 0.27 Fr.

12.0 4.0 4.0 6.o 2.0 6.o . 0.571 0.37 Fr.

3 6.o 3.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 0.171 0.11 Th.

15...... .5.... 1 7.0 4.o 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Trace Trace Th.

2 10.0 7.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 0.114 0.07 Fr. .3 10.0 5.° 0 o~o 0.00.0 ~ 0.o - \ qTrace Trace- Fr. . 4 6.o 4.o 0 .o 0.0 0.0 0.0 Trace Trace Fr.

2744 -18-
R. I. 4i418

TABLE 8. - Summary of drilling results on Potato Creek (fig. 7)

~Bedrock Pound

Total Over- Pay mining Mining concentrate per Pound. tin per Thawed

depth, burd~en, Gravel, horizon, seco, section,, cubic yards, cubic yards, or

Line No. Rlole No. feet feet feet feet feet feet mining section mining section frozen

1.............1 12.0 4.0 6.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 Trace Fr.

1 (R) 300 24.0 5.0 5.0 1.0 6.0 0.27 Fr.

...... 1 (R) 11.0 5.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Trace Fr .

1 10.0 0.0 8.0 5.0 1.0 9.0- 0.5 r

2 (L) 9 .0 3.0 4.0 .5. 1.0O. .5.0 D 031 Fr.

'3 T(L) 11.0 4.0 5.0 5.0~ 1.0 .6.0 0-.14 .

3 ...... . .. .....l 15.0 6.6 -4.0 4. 0 '1.0 5.0 .0.22 'Fr.

14.0 7. 4.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0Fr.

:2 (L) 14.0 6.0O 6.0 4.0 .1.0 7.0 .. '.4Fr.

..3 20.0 7-.0 8. 0 4.0 .1.0' 9. 0 0.0038 4 16.0 5.0 10~l.0 0.0 0.0, 0.0

5 11.0 ~9.0 1.0 0.0 O '0.0' 0.0 0.00 pr.

.~.1(L) 10.0 - 6.0~ 2.0 20 1.0' 3.0O 0.10 Fr.

2 ~~12.0' .3.0 _5.0 7020 7.0 -0.19 .Fr.

3 12.0 6.0 .4. 4.0 0 -. 5,0 0.54Fr

4- i6.0 5m.0 -7.0 .210 1.0 8.-0 . 014 .Fr.

10...... ....... (Ri) 12.0 '0.0~9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Trace Th.

2 C(L) 10.0 '50 3.0 .0 10 4.0 0.0 .

3 18.0 3. 0 7. 0 7 1.0 0 0.14

4 14l. 0 '5.0 '5. 0 3.50 1.0 6.0 01 r

5: 17.0 '8. 0 '6.0 6. 1i.0 7.0O 0.21

6 150 80 '.'O 1t.0 .7.0 -O-- 0.6' Fr.

2 (L) 9 0; -3.0 ~5.0 3.0 0 6'. ' 0.05 h

3 8. 5 3.0 3.5 4.,5 ~1.00 :405 0.15 5 .Fr

4 - 1.0 40o 4.0 o.k~- 1.0.'.. 5-.0_ 0.19 r

1 8.0, 4.0 2. 00 00 0. 0.00 Fr.

1 (R) 9.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 Th.

2 (P 13.0 00 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 Fr.: 3 OR 7:5 5. g.5 0g 0.0 0.0 0.00 Fr..

22.11(i 14.0 4s.5 2.Q Q.Q 0.0 _ _____0.00Th

2744 . 19-
R. I. 4418

TABLE 9. - Summary of drilling results on Diomede Creek (fig. 7)

Bedrock Pound

Total Over- Pay mining Mining concentrate per Pound tin per Thawed

depth burden, Gravel, horizon, sec., section, cubic yards, cubic yards, or

Line No. Eole No. feet feet feet feet feet feet mining section mining section frozen

10 . ..... 1 (L) 10.0 3.0 4. 0 1.0 5.0 0.24 Fr.

2 (L) 10.0 3.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ 0.00 Fr.

3 (L) 17.0 7.0 8.o o.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 Fr.

4 (L) 11.0 4.0 3.0 1. 1.0 4.0 _ 0.07 Fr.

5 (L) 10.0 3.0 5X0 3.0 1;0 6.o o.o4 Fr.

6 (L) 14.o 6.o 7.0 0.0 0.o0 0.0 0.00 Fr.

1 (R) 17:5 4.0 11.5 4.0 1.0 12.5 0.11 Fr.

2 (R) 27.0 3.3; 24.0 6.o 1.0 25.0 0.10 Fr.

3 (R) I 17,0 7.O 6.0 2.0 1.0 7.0 0.16 Fr.

15 ....... 1 38.0 4.o 34.o 27.0 1.0 35.0 0.05 Fr.

1 (L) 40.0 3.0 37.0 35.0 0,0 37.0 0.11 Fre

18.... ... 1 (R) 13.0 4.o 6.o 4.o 1.0 7.0 0. 07 Fr.

1 (L) 18.0 10.0 6.o 5.0 1.0 7.0 0.11 Fr.

22....... 1 (R) 15.0 4.5 8.5 3.0 1.0 9.5 0.04 Th,

2 (R) 20.0 5.0 6.0 2.0 1.0 7.0 o0o4 Fr.

3 (R) 22.0 4.o 8.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,00 Fr.-

4 (R) | 11.0 6.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ 0.00 Fr.

2744 20-
R. I. 4418

TABLE 10. - Sunmiary of results from trench sampling

Depth, Pounds

Total Depth mining Pounds tin per Sample depth, gravel, section, concentrate per cubic Depth, Creek Cut No. No, feet foot feet cubic yard yard O.B.

Buck

(fig. 6)11 37 1 1.7 1.7 1.7 2.5 1.46

37 2 2.5 2.5 2,5 10.6 6.21

37 3 6.4 2,5 3.6 0.63 0.37 2.8

32 1 5.6 0.0 0.0

Iron

(fig. 6)2/ 8 1 5.9 4.7 4.7 5.9 3.38 1.2

West Fork

(fig. 6) 4 1 3.9 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.6

Sutter

(fig. 5)3/ 12 1 4.2 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3

12 2 6.5 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0

9 2 2.6 1.6 1.6 1.39 0.90 1.0

9 3 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9

9 4 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7

9 5 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I00 3,1

g/ This concentrate contains 58.64 percent tin.

2/ This concentrate contains 57.40 percent tin.

T/ his concentrate contains 64.65 percent tin.

During the years 1911 to 1919, the York Dredging Co. and the American Tin

Mining Co. dredged along Buck and Grouse Creeks. From the size of the tailing it is estimated that 568,000 cubic yards was mined. The production was 1,194 short tons of tin concentrate. This concentrate contained 812 short tons or

1,624,000 pounds of tin. The area dredged averaged approximately 4.2 pounds of

concentrate recovered, or 2.86 pounds of tin per cubic yard.

2744 -21-