alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023012EN.01000901.xml

| 13.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 12/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 12/9

---

Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates applicable as from 1 February 2023

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 (1))

(2023/C 12/05)

Base rates calculated in accordance with the Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 6.). Depending on the use of the reference rate, the appropriate margins have still to be added as defined in this communication. For the discount rate this means that a margin of 100 basispoints has to be added. The Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 of 30 January 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 foresees that, unless otherwise provided for in a specific decision, the recovery rate will also be calculated by adding 100 basispoints to the base rate.

Modified rates are indicated in bold.

Previous table published in OJ C 487, 22.12.2022, p. 8.

| From | To | AT | BE | BG | CY | CZ | DE | DK | EE | EL | ES | FI | FR | HR | HU | IE | IT | LT | LU | LV | MT | NL | PL | PT | RO | SE | SI | SK | UK |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.2.2023 | ... | 2,56 | 2,56 | 0,79 | 2,56 | 7,43 | 2,56 | 2,92 | 2,56 | 2,56 | 2,56 | 2,56 | 2,56 | 2,56 | 15,10 | 2,56 | 2,56 | 2,56 | 2,56 | 2,56 | 2,56 | 2,56 | 7,62 | 2,56 | 8,31 | 2,44 | 2,56 | 2,56 | 2,77 |
| 1.1.2023 | 31.1.2023 | 2,56 | 2,56 | 0,36 | 2,56 | 7,43 | 2,56 | 2,92 | 2,56 | 2,56 | 2,56 | 2,56 | 2,56 | 2,56 | 15,10 | 2,56 | 2,56 | 2,56 | 2,56 | 2,56 | 2,56 | 2,56 | 7,62 | 2,56 | 8,31 | 2,44 | 2,56 | 2,56 | 2,77 |

From

To

AT

BE

BG

CY

CZ

DE

DK

EE

EL

ES

FI

FR

HR

HU

IE

IT

LT

LU

LV

MT

NL

PL

PT

RO

SE

SI

SK

UK

1.2.2023

...

2,56

2,56

0,79

2,56

7,43

2,56

2,92

2,56

2,56

2,56

2,56

2,56

2,56

15,10

2,56

2,56

2,56

2,56

2,56

2,56

2,56

7,62

2,56

8,31

2,44

2,56

2,56

2,77

1.1.2023

31.1.2023

2,56

2,56

0,36

2,56

7,43

2,56

2,92

2,56

2,56

2,56

2,56

2,56

2,56

15,10

2,56

2,56

2,56

2,56

2,56

2,56

2,56

7,62

2,56

8,31

2,44

2,56

2,56

2,77

---

(1)  OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

---
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9792 

To provide appropriations for the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 during 

the first lapse in appropriations in a fiscal year. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2024 

Mrs. SYKES (for herself, Ms. BROWN, and Ms. MCCLELLAN) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

To provide appropriations for the Food and Nutrition Act 

of 2008 during the first lapse in appropriations in a 

fiscal year. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Feed Our Families 

5 Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. APPROPRIATIONS FOR SNAP DURING FIRST LAPSE 

7 IN APPROPRIATIONS IN A FISCAL YEAR. 

8 In the case of any fiscal year beginning after Sep9 tember 30, 2024, there is appropriated, out of any money 

10 in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such sums as 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9792 IH

1 are necessary to carry out the Food and Nutrition Act 

2 of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.) for the first 90-day period 

3 beginning on the first day of a lapse in discretionary ap4 propriations for carrying out such Act for such fiscal year: 

5 Provided, That such funds shall be placed in reserve for 

6 use only in such amounts and at such times as may be7 come necessary to carry out program operations: Provided 

8 further, That such funds shall remain available until ex9 pended. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.1107-11 Extinguishing agents; requirements on mining equipment employed in low coal.

On mining equipment no more than 32 inches high, the quantity of extinguishing agent required under the provisions of §§ 75.1107-7, 75.1107-9, and 75.1107-10 may be reduced by one-fourth if space limitations on the equipment require such reduction.

[37 FR 15303, July 29, 1972]
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

U.S.C. Section 1350,

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Devcon International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Richard Rochon, acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 29, 2008



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ Richard Rochon            
|Richard Rochon                
|Acting Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)
**EXHIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**       In connection with the annual reportof CNB Corporation on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, R. PhilHucks, President and Chief Executive Officer of the CNB Corporation, certify tothe best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:**

 
| **1.**     | **The  above-listed Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and**                                 |
|------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| ** ** |                                                                                                                                                                             |
| **2.**     | **The  information contained in the above-listed Form 10-K fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company.** |

** **
| **Date:  March  16, 2006** | **/s/R. Phil  HucksR. Phil Hucks  President and Chief Executive Officer** |
|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                      |                                                                           |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Condensed Statement of Financial Position and Condensed Statement of Income and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          75,058
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  187,050
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,811
<INVENTORY>                                    147,899
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               458,578
<PP&E>                                         635,561
<DEPRECIATION>                                 323,683
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 926,305
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          211,072
<BONDS>                                        208,660
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,984
<OTHER-SE>                                     334,941
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   926,305
<SALES>                                        562,928
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               568,125
<CGS>                                          370,281
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  370,281
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,742
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 51,409
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,250
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,541
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,541
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06
        

</TABLE>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1298 

CA 11-00926 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ. 

 

LMIII REALTY, LLC, EDWARD JOY COMPANY, AND 

JOY PROCESS MECHANICAL SYSTEMS, 

PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, 

V ORDER

GEMINI INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, 

ET AL., DEFENDANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 1.)

 

COUGHLIN DUFFY LLP, NEW YORK CITY (JUSTIN N. KINNEY OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

SUGARMAN LAW FIRM, LLP, SYRACUSE (TIMOTHY J. PERRY OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John

C. Cherundolo, A.J.), entered August 26, 2010. The order denied the

motion of defendant Gemini Insurance Company to dismiss and for

summary judgment. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs (see Loafin’ Tree Rest. v Pardi [appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d

985). 

Entered: December 23, 2011 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
§ 716.3 Mountaintop removal. ( a ) Surface coal mining and reclamation operations that remove entire coal seams running through the upper fraction of a mountain, ridge, or hill by removing all of the overburden and creating a level plateau or gently rolling contour with no highwalls remaining are exempt from the requirements of § 715.14 of this chapter for achieving approximate original contour, if the following requirements are met: ( 1 ) An industrial, commercial, agricultural, residential, or public facility (including recreational facilities) use is proposed for the affected land.
( 2 ) The alternative land use criteria in § 715.13(d) of this chapter are met and the proposal is approved by the regulatory authority.
( 3 ) All other applicable requirements of part 715 of this chapter can be met.
( b ) Surface coal mining and reclamation operations conducted under this section shall comply with the following standards: ( 1 ) An outcrop barrier of sufficient width consisting of the toe of the lowest coal seam, and its associated overburden shall be retained to prevent slides and erosion.
( 2 ) The final graded top plateau slopes on the mined area shall be less than 1*v:*5*h* so as to create a level plateau or gently rolling configuration and the outslopes of the plateau shall not exceed 1*v:*2*h,* except where engineering data substantiates and the regulatory authority finds that a minimum static safety factor of 1.5 will be attained.
( 3 ) The resulting level or gently rolling contour shall be graded to drain inward from the outslope except at specific points where it drains over the outslope in protected stable channels.
( 4 ) Damage to natural watercourses below the area to be mined shall be prevented.
( 5 ) Spoil shall be placed on the mountaintop bench as is necessary to achieve the postmining land use approved under § 715.13 of this chapter. All excess spoil material not retained on the mountaintop shall be placed in accordance with the standards of § 715.15 of this chapter.
( c ) ( 1 ) All permits giving approval for mountaintop removal shall be reviewed not more than 3 years from the date of issuance of the permit, unless the permittee affirmatively demonstrates and the regulatory authority finds that all operations are proceeding in accordance with the terms of the permit and applicable requirements of the Act and the regulations of this part. The terms of the permit shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Act and the regulations of this part.
( 2 ) The terms of a permit for mountaintop removal may be modified by the regulatory authority if it determines that more stringent measures are necessary to prevent or control slides and erosion, prevent damage to natural water courses, avoid water pollution, or to assure successful revegetation.
§ 77.509 Transformers; installation and guarding. ( a ) Transformers shall be of the totally enclosed type, or shall be placed at least 8 feet above the ground, or installed in a transformer house, or surrounded by a substantial fence at least 6 feet high and at least 3 feet from any energized parts, casings, or wiring.
( b ) Transformer stations shall be enclosed to prevent persons from unintentionally or inadvertently contacting energized parts.
( c ) Transformer enclosures shall be kept locked against unauthorized entry.
### §20134. Arrest authority

Under regulations prescribed by the Administrator and approved by the Attorney General, employees of the Administration and of its contractors and subcontractors authorized to carry firearms under section 20133 of this title may arrest without warrant for any offense against the United States committed in their presence, or for any felony cognizable under the laws of the United States if they have reasonable grounds to believe that the person to be arrested has committed or is committing such felony. Persons granted authority to make arrests by this section may exercise that authority only while guarding and protecting property owned or leased by, or under the control of, the United States under the administration and control of the Administration or one of its contractors or subcontractors, at facilities owned by or contracted to the Administration.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3339.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20134 | 42 U.S.C. 2456a. | Pub. L. 85–568, title III, §304(f), as added Pub. L. 100–685, title II, §206, Nov. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 4090. |

Section
§ 585.605 What is a Site Assessment Plan (SAP)? ( a ) A SAP describes the site assessment activities meeting the criteria in § 585.600(a)(1) that you plan to perform on your commercial lease.
( b ) You must receive BOEM approval of your SAP, as provided in § 585.613, before you can begin any proposed site assessment activities requiring such approval.
( c ) If BOEM determines that your proposed site assessment facility or combination of facilities is complex or significant under § 585.613(a)(1), you must comply with the requirements in 30 CFR part 285, subpart G, regarding facility design and construction and submit your SMS as required by 30 CFR 285.810.
### §415. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 415, comprising section 505 of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as section 3095 of this title.
#### § 732.10 Information collection.

The information collection requirements contained in 30 CFR 732.16(a) and 732.17(b) have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3507 and assigned clearance number 1029-0024. The information is needed to afford a State the opportunity to modify or amend its State program and will be used by OSM to determine whether the amendment meets the provisions of the Act.

[47 FR 26365, June 17, 1982]
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.386 Final mining of pillars.

When only one mine opening is available due to final mining of pillars, no more than 20 miners at a time shall be allowed in the mine, and the distance between the mine opening and working face shall not exceed 500 feet.
#### § 57.19058 Experienced hoist operators.

Only experienced hoistmen shall operate the hoist except in cases of emergency and in the training of new hoistmen.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Wage Executions for Debt

              																	Hamm, John Edwin					,	Jones, Frances M. (Frances Mary)					 and 	Nugent, Rolf, 1901-1946. 						*Wage Executions for Debt : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 622*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. G.P.O., 										September 1936,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4141,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

AH/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ROGER BENSON,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-30166

D.C. No. 2:08-CR-06069-LRS

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Lonny R. Suko, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 11, 2010** 

Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Roger Benson appeals from the 33-month sentence imposed following his

guilty-plea conviction for escape from custody, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 751. 

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

JAN 26 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
AH/Research 09-30166

Benson contends that the district court plainly erred when it failed to give

him credit for the time served on an undischarged concurrent state sentence, under

U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(b)(1). 

Benson’s contention lacks merit because the state sentence did not result

from “relevant conduct,” see U.S.S.G § 1B1.3, and was not used to increase

Benson’s base offense level. Cf. United States v. Armstead, 552 F.3d 769, 783-84

(9th Cir. 2008).

AFFIRMED.
#### § 750.1 Scope.

This subchapter provides for the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on Indian lands and constitutes the Federal program for Indian lands.
#### § 725.13 Amount of grants.

The Office shall pay up to 100 percent of the costs to the agency in excess of the base program for administering and enforcing the performance standards during the initial regulatory program.
### §4027. Guarantee of residency for spouses of servicemembers

For the purposes of establishing the residency of a spouse of a servicemember for any purpose (including the registration of a business), the spouse of a servicemember may elect to use the same residence as the servicemember regardless of the date on which the marriage of the spouse and the servicemember occurred.

(Oct. 17, 1940, ch. 888, title VII, §707, as added Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title XVII, §1739(a), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1820; amended Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title X, §1081(c), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1922.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 117–81 made technical amendment to directory language of Pub. L. 116–92, §1739(a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of of 2021 Amendment

Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title X, §1081(c), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1922, provided that the amendment made by section 1081(c) is effective Dec. 20, 2019.