alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Benjamin F. Raysor, Jr., Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Appeal by claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board holding that claimant was ineligible for benefits because he had voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant, a general helper, was discharged on December 14, 1960, with the consent of his union, for insubordination and alleged physical threats to his supervisor. The altercation between claimant and his supervisor arose because claimant was away from his post for a period in excess of his allotted 10-minute break. On two previous occasions in 1959 claimant had been disciplined for overstaying his break and in June of 1960 had been discharged after an argument with his supervisor about being away from his post. After union intervention this discharge was rescinded. The board has adopted findings of the Referee in connection with the December 14 incident, and while some of the charges were found to be unsubstantiated it was found that claimant did overstay his break and when ordered to resume his post persisted in arguing with the supervisor. The board found that this action plus his attitude toward observing the requirement about promptly returning from breaks, especially when he knew his supervisors were checking his activities, provoked his discharge and thus his leaving employment was without good cause under the Unemployment Insurance Law. Claimant contends that the board did not properly resolve the factual issues in dispute upon the weight of the evidence, and, in addition, alleges unfair practices on the part of the company, collusion between the company and the union and deliberate fabrication on the part of the employer’s assistant personnel manager. Even assuming that all of these latter contentions are relevant here (see *Matter of Fiol [Corsi],*284 App. Div. 519, affd. 309 N. Y. 661) we see at most a factual question presented. We find the board’s conclusion was supported by substantial evidence and we therefore accept it as final (Labor Law, § 623). Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
Steps to Reducing Worker Exposure to 

COVID-19 in Fish and Seafood Processing 

and Packaging Facilities

Keep you and the people working around you safe. 

Take these steps even if you have no symptoms of COVID-19.

1-800-321-OSHA (6742)

TTY 1-877-889-5627

OSHA 4078-08 2020

www.osha.gov

• Stay home if you 

are sick. 

• Wear protective equipment 

for general safety and 

to limit the spread of 

the virus.

• Maintain at least six feet 

physical distance between 

co-workers, where possible.

• Avoid group gatherings 

during work breaks 

onshore and offshore.

• Use partitions installed along the 

production line to achieve physical 

distance, where social 

distancing is not possible. 

• Avoid sharing equipment 

and tools. Regularly clean 

tools and equipment that 

must be shared.

• Report any safety and 

health concerns to your 

supervisor, or to OSHA. 

• Wash your hands with soap 

and water or alcohol-based 

hand rubs containing at 

least 60% alcohol.

• Limit the number of 

workers in shared 

living quarters 

onboard vessels.

Stay current on public health 

recommendations. For more information, 

visit www.osha.gov/coronavirus or call 

1-800-321-OSHA (6742).

Occupational 

Safety and Health 

Administration
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.1101-6 Water sprinkler systems; general.

Water sprinkler systems may be installed to protect main and secondary belt-conveyor drives, however, where such systems are employed, they shall be installed and maintained in accordance with §§ 75.1101-7 through 75.1101-11.
#### § 750.10 Information collection.

The Office of Management and Budget has determined that the information collection requirements contained in 30 CFR part 750 do not require approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act.

[59 FR 43420, Aug. 23, 1994]
Editorial Note on Part 816
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54979, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 816 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93392, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 816.62 Use of explosives: Preblasting survey. ( a ) At least 30 days before initiation of blasting, the operator shall notify, in writing, all residents or owners of dwellings or other structures located within 1 ⁄ 2 mile of the permit area how to request a preblasting survey.
( b ) A resident or owner of a dwelling or structure within 1 ⁄ 2 mile of any part of the permit area may request a preblasting survey. This request shall be made, in writing, directly to the operator or to the regulatory authority, who shall promptly notify the operator. The operator shall promptly conduct a preblasting survey of the dwelling or structure and promptly prepare a written report of the survey. An updated survey of any additions, modifications, or renovations shall be performed by the operator if requested by the resident or owner.
( c ) The operator shall determine the condition of the dwelling or structure and shall document any preblasting damage and other physical factors that could reasonably be affected by the blasting. Structures such as pipelines, cables, transmission lines, and cisterns, wells, and other water systems warrant special attention; however, the assessment of these structures may be limited to surface conditions and other readily available data.
( d ) The written report of the survey shall be signed by the person who conducted the survey. Copies of the report shall be promptly provided to the regulatory authority and to the person requesting the survey. If the person requesting the survey disagrees with the contents and/or recommendations contained therein, he or she may submit to both the operator and the regulatory authority a detailed description of the specific areas of disagreement.
( e ) Any surveys requested more than 10 days before the planned initiation of blasting shall be completed by the operator before the initiation of blasting.
[48 FR 9807, Mar. 8, 1983, as amended at 81 FR 93392, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54979, Nov. 17, 2017]
From: "Frey, Nathan J." <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov>

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 06/14/2012 08:42 PM Subject: Re: Apparently we're ready for a final clean version Through the OP chain is great. Thanks for your patience throughout. It was great working with you!

----- Original Message ----- From: Lydia Wegman [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 08:36 PM To: Frey, Nathan J. Subject: Re: Apparently we're ready for a final clean version I think a clean version is coming to you through our usual OP chain. Do you want me to send you a clean versionb independent of that process?

----- Original Message ----- From: "Frey, Nathan J." [Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov] Sent: 06/15/2012 12:32 AM GMT To: Lydia Wegman Subje ct: Apparently we're ready for a final clean version Please confirm with Gina/Janet re: latest conversations. Please send the final clean version to me when available. Thanks!
Exhibit 4.1.4

                             Amendment Dated 12/9/99
                          to Adoption Agreement to the
                            Microchip Technology Inc.
                          Supplemental Retirement Plan

1.03 COVERAGE

     (A)  ONLY THOSE EMPLOYEES LISTED IN ATTACHMENT A WILL BE ELIGIBLE TO
          PARTICIPATE IN THE PLAN.

     (B)  THE ENTRY DATE(S) SHALL BE (check one):

          (1)  [ ] the first day of each Plan Year.

          (2)  [ ] the first day of each Plan Year and the date six months
                   later.

          (3)  [ ] the first day of each Plan Year and the first day of the
                   fourth, seventh, and tenth months.

          (4)  [X] the first day of each month.

1.04 COMPENSATION

     FOR PURPOSES OF DETERMINING CONTRIBUTIONS UNDER THE PLAN, COMPENSATION
     SHALL BE AS DEFINED IN SECTION 2.01(a)(6), BUT EXCLUDING (check the
     appropriate box(es)):

     (A)  [X] Overtime Pay.

     (B)  [X] Bonuses.

     (C)  [X] Commissions.

     (D)  [X] The value of a qualified or a non-qualified stock option granted
              to an Employee by the Employer to the extent such value is
              includable in the Employee's taxable income.

     (E)  [ ] No exclusions.

1.05 CONTRIBUTIONS

     (A)  DEFERRAL CONTRIBUTIONS THE EMPLOYER SHALL MAKE A DEFERRAL CONTRIBUTION
          IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 4.01 ON BEHALF OF EACH PARTICIPANT WHO HAS
          AN EXECUTED SALARY REDUCTION AGREEMENT IN EFFECT WITH THE EMPLOYER FAR
          THE PLAN YEAR (OR PORTION OF THE PLAN YEAR) IN QUESTION, NOT TO EXCEED
          25% of COMPENSATION FOR THAT PLAN YEAR.

          Effective: January 1 2000
          Authorized Signer: /s/ Sue Flores
          Date:12/9/99




4/11/94                                  3
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Earnings and Hours in the Paperboard Industry

              																	Cohen, Samuel E.					,	Riley, Hersey Ernest					,	Smith, Dorothy S.					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Earnings and Hours in the Paperboard Industry : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 692*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. G.P.O., 										1941,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4190,			accessed on September 5, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Exhibit 10.290


                                 PROMISSORY NOTE
                                  (NO INTEREST)

$9,184.00                                                   Glendale, California
   June 29, 2000




     FOR VALUE RECEIVED,  Joey Baris (Payor") promises to pay in lawful money of
the  United  States of  America to  Pollution  Research  and  Control  Corp.,  a
California corporation ("Payee"), or order, at Glendale,  California, the sum of
$9,184.00  Dollars  from the date  hereof on the  unpaid  principal  payable  in
installments  of principal only in the sum of $50.00 Dollars  commencing on July
15,  2000 and  payable  on the same day of each month  thereafter  until paid in
full.

     The unpaid principal may be prepaid without penalty. Each payment hereunder
shall be credited to the principal amount.

     If each  installment  under this note is not paid when due, the undersigned
shall pay all costs of collection thereof, including reasonable attorneys' fees,
whether or not suit or action is commenced to enforce  payment of this note, and
Payee may, at its option, declare the entire amount of the then unpaid principal
immediately  due and payable if such  default is not cured  within 10 days after
Payee provides the undersigned  written notice of such default.  The undersigned
hereby waives presentment, notice of dishonor and protest.

     This note is secured by shares of Payee's  common stock,  no par value (the
"Shares"),  pursuant to a certain Stock Pledge  Agreement,  dated as of June 29,
2000 (the "Pledge Agreement").

     Upon the termination of employment of Payor as an employee of Payee for any
reason,  the unpaid  balance of this note shall be  cancelled,  and the pro rata
portion  of Shares  which then not fully paid for,  shall be  returned  to Payee
pursuant to the terms of the Pledge Agreement.

                                            Payor:



                                            By:  /s/  Joey Baris
                                               --------------------------------
                                                      Joey Baris
§ 33.4 Types of dust collectors for which certificates of approval may be granted. ( a ) Certificates of approval will be granted only for completely assembled dust-collector or combination units; parts or subassemblies will not be approved.
( b ) The following types of equipment may be approved: Dust-collector or combination units having components designed specifically to prevent dissemination of airborne dust generated by drilling into coal-mine rock strata in concentrations in excess of those hereinafter stated in § 33.33 as allowable, and to confine or control the collected dust in such manner that it may be removed or disposed of without dissemination into the mine atmosphere in quantities that would create unhygienic conditions.
§ 795.11 Assistance funding. ( a ) *Use of funds.* Funds specifically authorized for this program shall be used to provide the services specified in § 795.9 and shall not be used to cover administrative expenses.
( b ) *Allocation of funds.* The program administrator shall establish a formula for allocating funds to provide services for eligible small operators if available funds are less than those required to provide the services pursuant to this part.
### §20146. Retrocession of jurisdiction

(a) Definition of State.—In this section, the term "State" means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern Mariana Islands, and any other commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States.

(b) Relinquishing Legislative Jurisdiction.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Administrator may relinquish to a State all or part of the legislative jurisdiction of the United States over lands or interests under the control of the Administrator in that State.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3353.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20146 | 42 U.S.C. 2459k. | Pub. L. 85–568, title III, §316, as added Pub. L. 109–155, title VII, §701, Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2935. |

Section
#### § 77.1710-1 Distinctively colored hard hats or hard caps; identification for newly employed, inexperienced miners.

Hard hats or hard caps distinctively different in color from those worn by experienced miners shall be worn at all times by each newly employed, inexperienced miner when working in or around a mine or plant for at least one year from the date of his initial employment as a miner or until he has been qualified or certified as a miner by the State in which he is employed.

(Sec. 101(a), Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, as amended (83 Stat. 745; 30 U.S.C. 811(a))

[39 FR 7176, Feb. 25, 1974]
§ 735.1 Scope. This part sets forth policies and procedures for grants to States to— ( a ) Develop State programs for the regulation and control of surface coal mining and reclamation operations;
( b ) Administer and enforce State programs for the regulation and control of surface coal mining and reclamation operations; and
( c ) Administer cooperative agreements for State regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on Federal lands.
( d ) Fund the Small Operator Assistance Program established under section 507(c) of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1201) and described in part 795 of this chapter.
[42 FR 62706, Dec. 13, 1977. Redesignated at 44 FR 15312, Mar. 13, 1979 and amended at 47 FR 38491, Aug. 31, 1982]
### §441. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 441, comprising section 901 of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as section 3171 of this title.
# C_2023163EN.01001601.xml

| 8.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 163/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 163/16

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation 1008/2008 of the European parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 163/09)

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned routes | Trieste – Milano Linate and vice versa |
| Period of validity of the contract | 1 September 2023 – 30 August 2026 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | 2 months from the date of publication of this notice |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the modified public service obligations can be obtained | ENAC |
| Air Transport and Licensing Department |
| Viale Castro Pretorio, n. 118 |
| 00185 Roma |
| ITALIA |

Member State

Italy

Concerned routes

Trieste – Milano Linate and vice versa

Period of validity of the contract

1 September 2023 – 30 August 2026

Deadline for submission of tenders

2 months from the date of publication of this notice

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the modified public service obligations can be obtained

ENAC

Air Transport and Licensing Department

Viale Castro Pretorio, n. 118

00185 Roma

ITALIA

Tel. +39 0644596247

Email: osp@enac.gov.it

Internet: http://www.mit.gov.it

http://www.enac.gov.it

---
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.1719 Illumination; purpose and scope of §§ 75.1719 through 75.1719-4; time for compliance. ( a ) Section 317(e) of the Act (30 U.S.C. 877(e)) directs and authorizes the Secretary to propose and promulgate standards under which all working places in a mine shall be illuminated by permissible lighting while persons are working in such places §§ 75.1719 through 75.1719-4 prescribe the requirements for illumination of working places in underground coal mines while persons are working in such places and while self-propelled mining equipment is operated in the working place.
( b ) Mine operators shall comply with §§ 75.1719 through 75.1719-4 not later than July 1, 1978.
[41 FR 43534, Oct. 1, 1976, as amended at 43 FR 13564, Mar. 31, 1978]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-40038 

Conference Calendar

 

RAY WARMSLEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TIM WEST, In his Official, Personal & Individual Capacity;

PAUL GOMEZ, In his Official, Personal & Individual Capacity;

JOSEPH BRADY, In his Official, Personal & Individual Capacity;

WAYLON KELLY, In his Official, Personal & Individual Capacity;

TANYA HANLY, In her Official, Personal & Individual Capacity, 

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:98-CV-1907

--------------------

August 24, 1999

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Landon Ray Warmsley, Texas prisoner #440277, appeals from

the dismissal of his civil rights action for failure to

prosecute. Warmsley moves for reimbursement of the costs of his

appeal and an award of attorney fees. Warmsley’s motion is

DENIED.

Warmsley’s action was dismissed because he failed to accept 
No. 99-40038

-2-

the magistrate judge’s order assessing filing fees pursuant to

the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA). Warmsley argues that

prison mailroom personnel are in violation of Guajardo v.

Estelle, 580 F.2d 748 (5th Cir. 1978), because the envelope

containing the magistrate judge’s Prison Litigation Reform Act

(PLRA) assessment order was opened; that mailroom personnel are

largely responsible for the dismissal of his action; that the

dismissal of his action manifested the district court’s prejudice

against him; and that the dismissal of his action violated his

right to petition the government for redress of grievances.

The dismissal of Warmsley’s complaint without prejudice was

not an abuse of discretion. Larson v. Scott, 157 F.3d 1030, 1031

(5th Cir. 1998). Warmsley’s appeal is without arguable merit and

is frivolous. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R.

42.2. The dismissal of this appeal as frivolous counts as a

strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). We caution Warmsley

that once he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed in

forma pauperis (IFP) in any civil action or appeal filed while he

is in prison unless he is under imminent danger of serious

physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

APPEAL DISMISSED; WARNING ISSUED.
Editorial Note on Part 784
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54958, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 784 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93355, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 784.12 Operation plan: Existing structures. ( a ) Each application shall contain a description of each existing structure proposed to be used in connection with or to facilitate the surface coal mining and reclamation operation. The description shall include: ( 1 ) Location;
( 2 ) Plans of the structure which describe its current condition;
( 3 ) Approximate dates on which construction of the existing structure was begun and completed; and
( 4 ) A showing, including relevant monitoring data or other evidence, whether the structure meets the performance standards of subchapter K (Permanent Program Standards) of this chapter or, if the structure does not meet the performance standards of subchapter K of this chapter, a showing whether the structure meets the performance standards of subchapter B (Interim Program Standards) of this chapter.
( b ) Each application shall contain a compliance plan for each existing structure proposed to be modified or reconstructed for use in connection with or to facilitate the surface coal mining and reclamation operation. The compliance plan shall include— ( 1 ) Design specifications for the modification or reconstruction of the structure to meet the design and performance standards of subchapter K of this chapter;
( 2 ) A construction schedule which shows dates for beginning and completing interim steps and final reconstruction;
( 3 ) Provisions for monitoring the structure during and after modification or reconstruction to ensure that the performance standards of subchapter K of this chapter are met; and
( 4 ) A showing that the risk of harm to the environment or to public health or safety is not significant during the period of modification or reconstruction.
[44 FR 15366, Mar. 13, 1979, as amended at 81 FR 93355, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54958, Nov. 17, 2017]