alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 551.9 Temporarily stopping, canceling, or relinquishing activities approved under a permit. ( a ) BOEM may temporarily stop exploration or scientific research activities under a permit when the Regional Director determines that: ( 1 ) Activities pose a threat of serious, irreparable, or immediate harm. This includes damage to life (including fish and other aquatic life), property, any mineral deposit (in areas leased or not leased), to the marine, coastal, or human environment, or to an archaeological resource;
( 2 ) You failed to comply with any applicable law, regulation, order, or provision of the permit. This would include BOEM's required submission of reports, well records or logs, and G&G data and information within the time specified; or
( 3 ) Stopping the activities is in the interest of National security or defense.
( b ) *Procedures to temporarily stop activities.* ( 1 ) The Regional Director will advise you either orally or in writing. BOEM will confirm an oral notification in writing and deliver all written notifications by courier or certified or registered mail. You must halt all activities under a permit as soon as you receive an oral or written notification.
( 2 ) The Regional Director will advise you when you may start your permit activities again.
( c ) *Procedure to cancel or relinquish a permit.* The Regional Director may cancel, or a permittee may relinquish, a permit at any time. ( 1 ) If BOEM cancels your permit, the Regional Director will advise you by certified or registered mail 30 days before the cancellation date and will state the reason.
( 2 ) You may relinquish the permit by advising the Regional Director by certified or registered mail 30 days in advance.
( 3 ) After BOEM cancels your permit or you relinquish it, you are still responsible for proper abandonment of any drill sites in accordance with the requirements of 30 CFR 251.7(b)(8). You must also comply with all other obligations specified in this part or in the permit.
#### § 887.1 Scope.

This part sets forth the procedures for grants to you, a State or Indian tribe with an approved reclamation plan to establish, administer, and operate a self-sustaining individual State or Indian tribe administered program to insure private property against damages caused by land subsidence resulting from underground coal mining.

[73 FR 67647, Nov. 14, 2008]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This Certification is intended to accompany the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
NCO Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. To the best of his knowledge, the undersigned, Michael J. Barrist, Chief
Executive Officer, hereby certifies that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


         Michael J. Barrist
         ------------------
         Michael J. Barrist, Chief Executive Officer

         Date: 5/15/03
Exhibit 31.01

I, Joseph Lively, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of VINOBLE, INC.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a - 15(e) and 15d - 15(e) for the registrant and we have:

         a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this quarterly report is being prepared;

          b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures and presented in this quarterly report and our
         conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
         procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
         report based on such evaluation; and

          c. disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting that occurred during; the
         registrant's fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
         the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
         or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which is
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

         b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: February 22, 2005

/s/ Joseph Lively
-----------------

Joseph Lively
Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9605 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9605

    To provide that any foreign government official who engages in 
     censorship of American speech is inadmissible and deportable.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 16, 2024

 Mr. Issa (for himself and Ms. Salazar) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide that any foreign government official who engages in 
     censorship of American speech is inadmissible and deportable.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Censors on our Shores Act''.

SEC. 2. INADMISSIBILITY AND DEPORTABILITY RELATED TO CENSORING SPEECH.

    (a) Inadmissibility.--Section 212(a)(2) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(2)) is amended by adding at the end 
the following:
                    ``(J) Censorship.--Any alien who, while serving as 
                a foreign government official, was responsible for or 
                directly carried out, at any time, any act against a 
                United States citizen located in the United States 
                that, if committed by a United States government 
                official in the United States, would violate the First 
                Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, is 
                inadmissible.''.
    (b) Deportability.--Section 237(a)(2) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)) is amended by adding at the end 
the following:
                    ``(G) Censorship.--Any alien who, while serving as 
                a foreign government official, was responsible for or 
                directly carried out, at any time, any act against a 
                United States citizen located in the United States 
                that, if committed by a United States government 
                official in the United States, would violate the First 
                Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, is 
                deportable.''.
                                 <all>
```
### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL AUTHORITY
POWER OF ATTORNEY   We, the undersigned directors of Questar Pipeline Company, hereby severally constitute R. Allan Bradley and S. E. Parks, and each of them acting alone, our true and lawful attorneys, with full power to them and each of them to sign for us, and in our names in the capacities indicated below, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2008 and any and all amend­ments to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Questar Pipeline Company, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures as they may be signed by the attorneys appointed herein to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2008 and any and all amendments to such Report.  Witness our hands on the respective dates set forth below.   Signature Title Date   /s/ Chairman of the Board 02/10/09 Keith O. Rattie   /s/ President and 02/10/09 R. Allan Bradley Chief Executive Officer   /s/ Director 02/10/09 L. Richard Flury   /s/ Director 02/10/09 Robert E. McKee III   /s/ Director 02/10/09 Gary G. Michael   /s/ Director 02/10/09 Bruce A. Williamson
FOURTH D I VI SI ON DOYLE, C. J.

, M I LLER, P. J.

, and DI LLA RD, P. J.

N O T IC E : M otions for r e c ons i de r a tion m us t be ph y sic a l ly r e ce iv ed i n our c le r k ’s offic e w ithin te n da y s of the da te of de c is ion to be de e m ed tim e ly file d.

http://w w w .ga a ppe a l s .us /r ule s

Decem ber 14, 2016



# I n th e Co u r t o f

A p p eals o f

G eo r g ia

A1 4 A1 77 0 . REGENT v

. THE STATE.

M I LLE R , Pres i d i n g J u d g e.

In Reg en t v. S t a te

, 2 9 9 Ga. 17 2 (7 8 7 SE2 d 2 1 7 ) (2 0 16 ), t h e Su p rem e Co u rt o f

Geo rg i a rev ers ed t h e ju d g m en t o f t h i s Co u rt i n Di v i s i o n 1 of Reg en t v. S t a t e , 3 3 3 Ga.

Ap p

. 3 5 0 (7 7 4 SE2 d 2 1 3 ) (2 0 1 5 ), i n wh i ch t h is Co u rt affi rm ed t h e d en i al o f Reg en t ’ s

m o t i o n t o m erg e hi s co n v i ct i o n s fo r ag g rav at ed bat t ery an d ag g rav at ed as s au l t

.

Co n s eq u en t l y , we v acat e Di v i s i o n 1 o f o u r o p i n i o n i n Reg en t

, s u p ra, 3 3 3 Ga. Ap p.

at 2 1 5

, an d i n it s p l ace ad o pt t h e ju d g m en t o f t h e Su p rem e Co urt as o u r o wn

.

Th e Su p rem e Co u rt o f Geo rg i a d i d n ot ad d res s o r co n s id er Di v is i on 2 o f o u r

earl ier o p i n i o n , i n w h ich we vacat ed th e ban i s hm en t pro v i s i on in Reg en t ’ s s en t en ci n g

o rd er, an d rem an d ed t h i s cas e t o t h e t ri al co u rt fo r t h e p u rp o se o f res en t en ci n g Reg en t

o n t h at p ro v i s i on

. Becau s e Di v is i o n 2 i s co ns i s t en t wi t h t he Su p rem e Co u rt ’ s o p i n i o n,t h at d i v i s i o n b eco m es b i n d i n g u p o n t h e ret u rn o f t h e r e m i t t i t u r. S h a d i x v. Ca r r o l l

Co u n t y , 2 7 4 Ga. 5 6 0 , 5 6 3 (1 ) (5 5 4 SE2 d 4 6 5 ) (2 0 0 1 ).

Ju d g men t r ever

s ed i n pa r t

, a n d ca se r ema n d

ed . Do yl e, C. J., a n d Di l l a r d

, P.

J., co n cu r

.

2
**DIAPULSE
      CORPORATION OF AMERICA**


**FORM
      10-QSB**


**For
      the Quarter Period ended June 30, 2007**









**Exhibit
      32**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Diapulse, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-QSB/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, being
      the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
      hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the SARBANES-OXLEY Act of 2002, that:


1.
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
  2.
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
  By:
                /s/ David M. Ross
                September
                  27,
                  2007David
                  M. RossChief
                    Executive Officer and
                  Principal
                    Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to Diapulse Corporation of America and will be retained by Diapulse
      Corporation of America and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.
### §6106. Grants to States

(a) In General.—The Secretary may make a grant of financial assistance to a State that qualifies under section 6104(b) to assist in improving—

(1) the overall quality and effectiveness of one-call notification systems in the State;

(2) communications systems linking one-call notification systems;

(3) location capabilities, including training personnel and developing and using location technology;

(4) record retention and recording capabilities for one-call notification systems;

(5) public information and education;

(6) participation in one-call notification systems; or

(7) compliance and enforcement under the State one-call notification program.

(b) State Action Taken Into Account.—In making grants under this section, the Secretary shall take into consideration the commitment of each State to improving its State one-call notification program, including legislative and regulatory actions taken by the State after the date of enactment of this chapter.

(c) Funding for One-Call Notification Systems.—A State may provide funds received under this section directly to any one-call notification system in such State that substantially adopts the best practices identified under section 6105.

(Added Pub. L. 105–178, title VII, §7302(a), June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 482.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of enactment of this chapter, referred to in subsec. (b), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 105–178, which was approved June 9, 1998.
\\DC - 004721/000002 - 4689019 v2

BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

INTRA-ALASKA SERVICE MAIL RATES

)

)

)

)

Dockets

DOT-OST-2003-14694

DOT-OST-2003-14695

June 12, 2013

NOTICE OF EQUALIZATION OF PENINSULA AIRWAYS, INC.

Pursuant to a request by the United States Postal Service (“USPS”), Peninsula Airways,

Inc. (“PenAir”), a certificated air carrier with authority to transport U.S. mail within the State of

Alaska, hereby provides notice of its intent to equalize and match, on a total rate per pound

basis, the lower rates or combination of rates now in effect or hereafter prescribed and paid to

Everts and Northern Air Cargo (“NAC”) for each category of mail it transports between

Anchorage and Aniak, effective immediately.1In further support of this Notice, PenAir states

the following:

1. DOT Order 1990-10-34 provides that an air carrier may elect to establish a

reduced charge equal to the charge prescribed for mail transportation actually being performed

between the same origin and destination points by any other certificated carrier or combination

of carriers, regardless of routing.

2. Subject to the conditions below and pursuant to the USPS’ request, PenAir gives

this notice of its election to equalize and match on a total rate per pound basis, the lower rate

or combination of rates now in effect or hereafter prescribed and paid to Everts and NAC for

each category of mail it transports between Anchorage and Aniak. PenAir elects to equalize in

this market to any lower rate or combination of rates prescribed and paid in the future to any

other carrier or carriers.

3. Rate equalization under this notice is immediately effective and will remain in

effect until terminated by written notice filed at least ten days in advance of such termination;

provided, however, that this rate equalization notice ceases to be effective when and so long as

a lower-rated service or combination of services is not offered between Anchorage and Aniak or

is not utilized by the USPS for mail transportation.

1

Although PenAir is a mainline carrier on the Anchorage – Aniak route, PenAir is filing this notice

at the request of the USPS.
\\DC - 004721/000002 - 4689019 v2

WHEREFORE, PenAir give this notice of equalization of its mail rates and requests

equitable tender of mail in this market pursuant to the practices and procedures of the

Department of Transportation and the United States Postal Service.

Respectfully submitted,

______________________

Scott Bloomquist

Peninsula Airways

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Notice of Equalization of PenAir has been

served this June 12, 2013 upon each of the following addressees:

kevin.adams@dot.gov

Joseph.Anzalone@usps.gov

joefjr.mcdonald@usps.gov

dsquier@nac.aero

reverts@evertsair.com

amiller@lac.lynden.com

john@ACEAirCargo.com

MLenorman@ERAaviation.com

Joe.Sprague@Alaskaair.com

mike.hageland@hageland.com

bob@FrontierFlying.com

______________________
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site.(Historical purposes)

**Title:** Annual Report

2015,2016

 
SuDoc:C 55.301/3:
Item Number:0609-C-24 (online)
CGP system Number:001051461
Exhibit 32



Certification

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of FNB Corp., a North Carolina corporation (the Corporation), does hereby
certify that:



The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2005 (the Form 10-K) of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|                     |  |  |  |                                             
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 15, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/                        MICHAEL C. MILLER
|                     |  |  |  | Michael C. Miller Chief Executive Officer   
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 15, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/                        JERRY A. LITTLE  
|                     |  |  |  | Jerry A. Little Chief Financial Officer     



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a
separate disclosure document.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****The Gettysburg quarterly**
 
2006:Fall
2009:Spring | Fall
2010:Winter/Spring | Summer| Fall
2011:Spring | Fall
2011/2012:Winter
2012:Fall
2013:Winter
 
SuDoc:I 29.2:G 33/4/
Item Number:0648 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001014286
 
November 16, 2017
§ 886.17 How can my grant be amended? ( a ) A grant amendment is a change of the terms or conditions of the grant agreement. An amendment may be initiated by you or by us.
( b ) You must promptly notify us in writing, or we must promptly notify you in writing, of events or proposed changes that may require a grant amendment.
( c ) All procedures for grant amendments follow 43 CFR part 12.
( d ) We must approve or disapprove the amendment within 30 days of receiving your request.
#### William Downs, Respondent, v. State of New York, Appellant. Dorothy Downs, Respondent, v. State of New York, Appellant.

(Claim No. 34430.) (Claim No. 34431.)

The State appeals from two judgments of the Court of Claims resulting from an award of $4,000 to Dorothy Downs for personal injuries and $500 to her husband in a derivative action. Claimant, Dorothy Downs, went with her husband and children to the James Baird State Park, operated and maintained by the State, on August 14, 1956. A fee was paid for parking their ear and Dorothy Downs paid for the rental of a pair of roller skates furnished by the State and a State employee adjusted the skates and fitted them. It appears to be without dispute that, while claimant was skating on a rink maintained by the State, the entire front wheel assembly of one skate fell off, causing claimant to fall and sustain injuries. The Court of Claims has found that the State was negligent in failing to exercise reasonable care in the inspection, adjustment and fitting of the skates, and that the claimant was free from contributory negligence. The record presents clear questions of fact with ample evidence to support the findings of the Court of Claims. Appellant also claims that the award of $4,000 to Dorothy Downs is excessive. She sustained painful injuries of a nonpermanent nature, and a permanent injury to the fourth finger of the right hand which results in a deformity and affects the use of the hand. The assessment of damages by the trial court was reasonable and should not be disturbed on appeal. Judgments unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents.