alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.220 Roof control plan. ( a ) ( 1 ) Each mine operator shall develop and follow a roof control plan, approved by the District Manager, that is suitable to the prevailing geological conditions, and the mining system to be used at the mine. Additional measures shall be taken to protect persons if unusual hazards are encountered.
( 2 ) The proposed roof control plan and any revisions to the plan shall be submitted, in writing, to the District Manager. When revisions to a roof control plan are proposed, only the revised pages need to be submitted unless otherwise specified by the District Manager.
( b ) ( 1 ) The mine operator will be notified in writing of the approval or denial of approval of a proposed roof control plan or proposed revision.
( 2 ) When approval of a proposed plan or revision is denied, the deficiencies of the plan or revision and recommended changes will be specified and the mine operator will be afforded an opportunity to discuss the deficiencies and changes with the District Manager.
( 3 ) Before new support materials, devices or systems other than roof bolts and accessories, are used as the only means of roof support, the District Manager may require that their effectiveness be demonstrated by experimental installations.
( c ) No proposed roof control plan or revision to a roof control plan shall be implemented before it is approved.
( d ) Before implementing an approved revision to a roof control plan, all persons who are affected by the revision shall be instructed in its provisions.
( e ) The approved roof control plan and any revisions shall be available to the miners and representative of miners at the mine.
[53 FR 2375, Jan. 27, 1988; 53 FR 11395, Apr. 6, 1988, as amended at 60 FR 33723, June 29, 1995; 71 FR 16668, Apr. 3, 2006]
#### In the Matter of the Claim of William A. R. Heck, Respondent, v. Melville Fire Department Co. No. 2 et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

’Appeal from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. All the substantial medical evidence in the record is to the effect claimant should have an operation for the correction of the effect of an accident and that there is strong and reasonable probability the operation will be successful. The board in these circumstances is not warranted in continuing compensation on the stated ground that “claimant is not unreasonable in refusing surgery” *(Matter of Peasley*v. *Wendling Iron Works,*277 App. Div. 622; *Matter of Tillow*v. *Daystrom Corp.,*273 App. Div. 1045; *Matter of Wasyluk*v. *Webb <& Knapp,*12 A D 2d 555). Award reversed and claim remitted to the Workmen’s Compensation Board for further proceedings, with costs to the appellants against the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Bergan, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Greene County
Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended
December 31, 2002 (the Report), I, R. Stan Puckett, Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
my knowledge, that:

| |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                                                                                     
| |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  |  | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and                               
|
| |  |  |  | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Greene County Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by Greene
County Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

|    |  |                                          
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------
|/s/ |  | R. Stan Puckett                          
|    | 
|    |  | R. Stan Puckett                          
|    |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
|    |  | Officer                                  

Date: March 27, 2003
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9775 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 119 North Anderson Street in Elwood, Indiana, as the ‘‘Officer Noah Jacob Shahnavaz Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 9775 EH

1 SECTION 1. OFFICER NOAH JACOB SHAHNAVAZ POST OF2 FICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 119 North Anderson Street in 

5 Elwood, Indiana, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Officer Noah Jacob Shahnavaz Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Officer Noah Jacob 

11 Shahnavaz Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 

2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9775 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostShahnavaz Post Office Building’’. in Elwood, Indiana, as the ‘‘Officer Noah Jacob al Service located at 119 North Anderson Street
### §3315. Repealed. Pub. L. 117–103, div. X, title V, §504(e), Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 988

Section, Pub. L. 115–31, div. N, title VI, §608(b), May 5, 2017, 131 Stat. 833, required annual certification of controlled access programs to the congressional intelligence committees.
#### § 77.704-5 Installation of protective equipment.

Before repair work on energized high-voltage surface lines is begun, protective equipment shall be used to cover all bare conductors, ground wires, guys, telephone lines, and other attachments in proximity to the area of planned repairs. Such protective equipment shall be installed from a safe position below the conductors or other apparatus being covered. Each rubber protective device employed in the making of repairs shall have a dielectric strength of 20,000 volts, or more.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 22, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 83582]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28199]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than January 6, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Chris P. Wangen, Assistant 
Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:
    1. Steven and Laurel Klefstad, Forman, North Dakota; to join the 
McLaen family shareholder group, a group acting in concert, to retain 
voting shares of Napoleon Bancorporation, Inc., Napoleon, North Dakota, 
and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Stock Growers Bank, 
Forman, North Dakota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 17, 
2020.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2020-28199 Filed 12-21-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
### §50916. Disclosing information

The Secretary of Transportation, an officer or employee of the United States Government, or a person making a contract with the Secretary under section 50907(b) of this title may disclose information under this chapter that qualifies for an exemption under section 552(b)(4) of title 5 or is designated as confidential by the person or head of the executive agency providing the information only if the Secretary decides withholding the information is contrary to the public or national interest.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1340, §70114 of title 49; renumbered §70114 then §50916 of title 51 and amended Pub. L. 111–314, §4(d)(2), (3)(P), (5)(S), Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3440–3442.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 70114 | 49 App.:2608(c). | Oct. 30, 1984, Pub. L. 98–575, §9(c), 98 Stat. 3059. |

Section

The words "data or" are omitted as surplus. The words "the head of" and "executive" are added for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–314, §4(d)(5)(S), substituted "section 50907(b)" for "section 70106(b)".

Pub. L. 111–314, §4(d)(2), (3)(P), successively renumbered section 70114 of title 49 and section 70114 of this title as this section.
§ 77.606-1 Rubber gloves; minimum requirements. ( a ) Rubber gloves (lineman's gloves) worn while handling high-voltage trailing cables shall be rated at least 20,000 volts and shall be used and tested in accordance with the provisions of §§ 77.704-6 through 77.704-8.
( b ) Rubber gloves (wireman's gloves) worn while handling trailing cables energized by 660 to 1,000 volts shall be rated at least 1,000 volts and shall not be worn inside out or without protective leather gloves.
( c ) Rubber gloves shall be inspected for defects before use on each shift and at least once thereafter during the shift when such rubber gloves are used for extended periods. All protective rubber gloves which contain defects shall be discarded and replaced prior to handling energized cables.
§ 586.114 How will data and information obtained by BOEM under this part be disclosed to the public? ( a ) BOEM will make data and information available in accordance with the requirements and subject to the limitations of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552) and the regulations contained in 43 CFR part 2.
( b ) BOEM will not release such data and information that we have determined is exempt from disclosure under exemption 4 of FOIA. We will review such data and information and objections of the submitter to determine whether release at that time will result in substantial competitive harm or disclosure of trade secrets.
( c ) After considering any objections from the submitter, if we determine that release of such data and information will result in: ( 1 ) No substantial competitive harm or disclosure of trade secrets, then the data and information will be released.
( 2 ) Substantial competitive harm or disclosure of trade secrets, then the data and information will not be released at that time but will be subject to further review every 3 years thereafter.
00475 0.95 19 205
#### § 77.1909-1 Use of nonpermissible explosives and nonpermissible shot-firing units; approval by Health and Safety District Manager.

Where the Coal Mine Health and Safety District Manager has determined that the use of nonpermissible explosives and nonpermissible shot-firing units will not pose a hazard to any person during the development of a slope or shaft, he may, after written application by the operator, approve the use of such explosives and shot-firing units and issue a permit for the use of such explosives and devices setting forth the safeguards to be employed by the operator to protect the health and safety of any person exposed to such blasting.

(Pub. L. No. 96-511, 94 Stat. 2812 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*))

[36 FR 9364, May 22, 1971, as amended at 60 FR 33723, June 29, 1995]
### §2445. Limitation on bonuses for employees who engage in improper program management

#### (a) Limitation

#### (1) In general

The Secretary of Energy or the Administrator may not pay to a covered employee a bonus during the one-year period beginning on the date on which the Secretary or the Administrator, as the case may be, determines that the covered employee engaged in improper program management that resulted in a notification under section 2753 of this title or significantly and detrimentally affected the cost, scope, or schedule associated with the approval of critical decision 3 in the acquisition process for a project (as defined in Department of Energy Order 413.3B (relating to program management and project management for the acquisition of capital assets)).

#### (2) Implementation guidance

Not later than one year after November 25, 2015, the Secretary shall issue guidance for the implementation of paragraph (1).

#### (b) Guidance prohibiting bonuses for additional employees

Not later than 180 days after November 25, 2015, the Secretary and the Administrator shall each issue guidance prohibiting the payment of a bonus to a covered employee during the one-year period beginning on the date on which the Secretary or the Administrator, as the case may be, determines that the covered employee engaged in improper program management—

(1) that jeopardized the health, safety, or security of employees or facilities of the Administration or another element of the Department of Energy involved in nuclear security; or

(2) in carrying out defense nuclear nonproliferation activities.

#### (c) Waiver

The Secretary or the Administrator, as the case may be, may waive the limitation on the payment of a bonus under subsection (a) or (b) on a case-by-case basis if—

(1) the Secretary or the Administrator, as the case may be, notifies the appropriate congressional committees of such waiver; and

(2) a period of 60 days elapses following such notification.

#### (d) Definitions

In this section:

(1) The term "appropriate congressional committees" means—

(A) the congressional defense committees; and

(B) the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate.

(2) The term "bonus" means a bonus or award paid under title 5, including under chapters 45 or 53 of such title, or any other provision of law.

(3) The term "covered employee" has the meaning given that term in section 2443 of this title.

(Pub. L. 106–65, div. C, title XXXII, §3246, as added Pub. L. 114–92, div. C, title XXXI, §3111(b)(1), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 1187.)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Quezada, Appellant.

[832 NYS2d 803]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles J. Tejada, J., at hearing; Micki A. Scherer, J., at plea and sentence), rendered June 23, 2004, convicting defendant of manslaughter in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 7 to 21 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant made valid written and oral waivers of his right to appeal *(see People v Ramos,*7 NY3d 737 [2006]; *People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248 [2006]), which foreclose his suppression and excessive sentence claims. The court did not conflate the right to appeal with the rights automatically forfeited by pleading guilty. In any event, were we to find that defendant did not make a valid waiver of his right to appeal, we would find that the court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion and that there is no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Marlow, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
1 | P a g e

The Need for Urgent Action on Election Security

Primaries for the 2018 midterm elections are already underway. With the general election 

scheduled for November 6, it is vital that investigations like the House Intelligence Committee’s 

Russia probe share their findings and recommendations quickly to help improve security for the 

midterm elections. As demonstrated below, there is a widespread consensus in Congress and in 

the executive branch that urgent action is needed to counter the threat of continued Russian 

meddling in U.S. elections. 

 While discussing election security, and specifically, protecting our elections from 

Russian interference, Ranking Member Schiff said it would be a “dereliction of duty” 

not to act now. (The Hill)

 When asked if he was concerned about potential Russian interference in the 2018 

election, Central Intelligence Agency Director Pompeo said, “Of course. I have every 

expectation that they will continue to try to do that but I am confident that America will 

be able to have a free and fair election, that we’ll push back in a way that is sufficiently 

robust that the impact they have on our election won’t be great.” (BBC Interview)

 Testifying before the Senate Armed Services Committee in February, National Security 

Agency Director Mike Rogers said, “...this is going to continue, and 2016 won’t be 

viewed as isolated. This is something that will be sustained over time.” (Washington 

Post)

 Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats told Congress, “There should be no doubt 

that Russia perceives that its past efforts have been successful and views the 2018 

midterm US elections as a potential target for Russian influence operations. Frankly, the 

United States is under attack.” (Vox)

 House Homeland Security Committee Ranking Member Bennie Thompson and 

House Administration Committee Ranking Member Bob Brady released a report in 

February addressing potential Russian interference in U.S. elections. In the report, they 

say, “The unprecedented attack by Russia exposed serious national security 

vulnerabilities in our election infrastructure. We urge Congress to act in a bipartisan 

fashion and take action.” (Politico)

 In a December, 2017 interview, H.R. McMaster, the President’s National Security 

Advisor, said, “I believe that Russia was engaged in a very sophisticated campaign of 

subversion to affect our confidence in democratic institutions, in democratic processes, 
2 | P a g e

including elections. What they want to do is create the kind of tension, the kind of vitriol 

that undermines our confidence in who we are.” (Newsweek)

 "There is very little doubt that they have either interfered or attempted to interfere in a 

number of elections in democracies," Secretary of Defense Mattis said while answering 

questions at NATO headquarters in Brussels in February 2017. (The Hill)
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Removal of Gold Cover

              																	United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking and Currency, 1865-1974					 and 	Ninetieth Congress, 1967-1969. 						*Removal of Gold Cover : Hearings Before the Committee on Banking and Currency, House of Representatives, Ninetieth Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 14743, January 23, 25, 30, 31; February 1, 1968*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										January 23, 25, 30, 31; February 1, 1968,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1015,			accessed on September 9, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### § 57.6203 Locomotives.

Explosive material shall not be transported on a locomotive. When explosive material is hauled by trolley locomotive, covered, electrically insulated cars shall be used.
§ 71.301 Respirable dust control plan; approval by District Manager and posting. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 28479 , Apr. 18, 2024.
The following is required until April 14, 2025: ( a ) The District Manager will approve respirable dust control plans on a mine-by-mine basis. When approving respirable dust control plans, the District Manager shall consider whether: ( 1 ) The respirable dust control measures would be likely to maintain concentrations of respirable coal mine dust at or below the applicable standard; and
( 2 ) The operator's compliance with all provisions of the respirable dust control plan could be objectively ascertained by MSHA.
( b ) MSHA may take respirable dust samples to determine whether the respirable dust control measures in the operator's plan effectively maintain concentrations of respirable coal mine dust at or below the applicable standard.
( c ) The operator shall comply with all provisions of each respirable dust control plan upon notice from MSHA that the respirable dust control plan is approved.
( d ) The approved respirable dust control plan and any revisions shall be: ( 1 ) Provided upon request to the representative of miners by the operator following notification of approval;
( 2 ) Made available for inspection by the representative of miners; and
( 3 ) Posted on the mine bulletin board within 1 working day following notification of approval, and shall remain posted for the period that the plan is in effect.
( e ) The operator may review respirable dust control plans and submit proposed revisions to such plans to the District Manager for approval.
[79 FR 24985, May 1, 2014, as amended at 89 FR 28478, Apr. 18, 2024]