alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §60304. Program evaluation

(a) Advisory Committee.—The Administrator shall establish an advisory committee, consisting of individuals with appropriate expertise in State, local, regional, and tribal agencies, the university research community, and the remote sensing and other geospatial information industries, to monitor the program established under section 60303 of this title. The advisory committee shall consult with the Federal Geographic Data Committee and other appropriate industry representatives and organizations. Notwithstanding section 1013 of title 5, the advisory committee established under this subsection shall remain in effect until the termination of the program under section 60303 of this title.

(b) Effectiveness Evaluation.—Not later than December 31, 2009, the Administrator shall transmit to Congress an evaluation of the effectiveness of the program established under section 60303 of this title in exploring and promoting the integrated use of sources of remote sensing and other geospatial information to address State, local, regional, and tribal agency needs. Such evaluation shall have been conducted by an independent entity.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3424; Pub. L. 117–286, §4(a)(326), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4341.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 60304 | 42 U.S.C. 16674. | Pub. L. 109–155, title III, §314, Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2921. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 117–286 substituted "section 1013 of title 5," for "section 14 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 App. U.S.C.),".
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         259,636
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  746,413
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,985
<INVENTORY>                                    477,095
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,670,455
<PP&E>                                         112,895
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,674,322
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          977,392
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        99,046
<OTHER-SE>                                     370,534
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,674,322
<SALES>                                        987,328
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               987,328
<CGS>                                           45,164
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,164
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               235,420
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              52,870
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                654,008
<INCOME-TAX>                                   234,501
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            419,507
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   419,507
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
        

</TABLE>
§ 48.32 Appeals procedures. The operator, miner, and miners' representative shall have the right of appeal from a decision of the District Manager. ( a ) In the event an operator, miner, or miners' representative decides to appeal a decision by the District Manager, such an appeal shall be submitted, in writing, to the Administrator for Coal Mine Safety and Health or the Administrator for Metal and Nonmetal Mine Safety and Health, as appropriate, MSHA, 201 12th Street South, Arlington, VA 22202-5452, within 30 days of notification of the District Manager's decision.
( b ) The Administrator may require additional information from the operator, the miners or their representatives, and the District Manager, if the Administrator determines such information is necessary.
( c ) The Administrator shall render a decision on the appeal within 30 days after receipt of the appeal.
[43 FR 47459, Oct. 13, 1978, as amended at 47 FR 23641, May 28, 1982; 67 FR 38384, June 4, 2002; 80 FR 52986, Sept. 2, 2015]
### §60147. Consultation

(a) Consultation With Secretary of Defense.—The Secretary and the Landsat Program Management shall consult with the Secretary of Defense on all matters under this chapter affecting national security. The Secretary of Defense shall be responsible for determining those conditions, consistent with this chapter, necessary to meet national security concerns of the United States and for notifying the Secretary and the Landsat Program Management promptly of such conditions.

(b) Consultation With Secretary of State.—

(1) In general.—The Secretary and the Landsat Program Management shall consult with the Secretary of State on all matters under this chapter affecting international obligations. The Secretary of State shall be responsible for determining those conditions, consistent with this chapter, necessary to meet international obligations and policies of the United States and for notifying promptly the Secretary and the Landsat Program Management of such conditions.

(2) International aid.—Appropriate United States Government agencies are authorized and encouraged to provide remote sensing data, technology, and training to developing nations as a component of programs of international aid.

(3) Reporting discriminatory distribution.—The Secretary of State shall promptly report to the Secretary and Landsat Program Management any instances outside the United States of discriminatory distribution of Landsat data.

(c) Status Report.—The Landsat Program Management shall, as often as necessary, provide to Congress complete and updated information about the status of ongoing operations of the Landsat system, including timely notification of decisions made with respect to the Landsat system in order to meet national security concerns and international obligations and policies of the United States Government.

(d) Reimbursements.—If, as a result of technical modifications imposed on a licensee under subchapter III on the basis of national security concerns, the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense or with other Federal agencies, determines that additional costs will be incurred by the licensee, or that past development costs (including the cost of capital) will not be recovered by the licensee, the Secretary may require the agency or agencies requesting such technical modifications to reimburse the licensee for such additional or development costs, but not for anticipated profits. Reimbursements may cover costs associated with required changes in system performance, but not costs ordinarily associated with doing business abroad.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3421.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 60147 | 15 U.S.C. 5657. | Pub. L. 102–555, title V, §507, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4178. |

Section
#### OSTRANDER FIRE BRICK CO., Plaintiff, Respondent, v. McCORMICK et al., Defendants, Appellants and Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 23, 1903.)

Action by the Ostrander Fire Brick Company against Peter J. McCormick, Frederick G. Voss, James B. Ludlow, and Jacob F. Miller, as executors, etc., of Thomas W. Ludlow, Jr., deceased, and others.

No opinion. Order reversed on argument, by consent, and motion dismissing the complaint granted, without costs.
#### § 905.815 Performance standards—Coal exploration.

Part 815 of this chapter, *Permanent Program Performance Standards—Coal Exploration,* shall apply to any person who conducts coal exploration.
#### § 921.780 Surface mining permit applications—minimum requirements for reclamation and operation plan.

Part 780 of this chapter, *Surface Mining Permit Applications—Minimum Requirements for Reclamation and Operation Plan,* shall apply to any person who makes application to conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
§ 62.171 Audiometric test procedures. ( a ) All audiometric testing under this part must be conducted in accordance with scientifically validated procedures. Audiometric tests must be pure tone, air conduction, hearing threshold examinations, with test frequencies including 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, and 6000 Hz. Each ear must be tested separately.
( b ) The mine operator must compile an audiometric test record for each miner tested. The record must include: ( 1 ) Name and job classification of the miner tested;
( 2 ) A copy of all of the miner's audiograms conducted under this part;
( 3 ) Evidence that the audiograms were conducted in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section;
( 4 ) Any exposure determination for the miner conducted in accordance with § 62.110 of this part; and
( 5 ) The results of follow-up examination(s), if any.
( c ) The operator must maintain audiometric test records for the duration of the affected miner's employment, plus at least 6 months, and make the records available for inspection by an authorized representative of the Secretary of Labor.
§ 819.11 Auger mining: General. ( a ) Auger mining operations shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements of part 816 of this chapter, except as provided in this part.
( b ) The regulatory authority may prohibit auger mining, if necessary to— ( 1 ) Maximize the utilization, recoverability, or conservation of the solid-fuel resource, or
( 2 ) Protect against adverse water-quality impacts.
Exhibit 4.9

Number: XXXXX                                                      *XXX* Shares
       -------                                                     ------

                               SCAN-GRAPHICS, INC.

         INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

                        CLASS A PREFERRED STOCK, SERIES D
                         PAR VALUE: $1,000.00 PER SHARE

THIS CERTIFIES THAT                XXXXXXXXXXXXX               IS THE REGISTERED
                   --------------------------------------------
HOLDER OF                     XXXXXXXXX                             SHARES  OF
         ----------------------------------------------------------
Class A Preferred Stock, Series D, of Scan-Graphics, Inc., fully paid and
non-assessable, transferable only on the books of the Corporation in person or
by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. The
Corporation will furnish to any shareholder upon request and without charge, a
full or summary statement of the designations, voting rights, preferences,
limitations and special rights of the shares of each class authorized to be
issued.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto
affixed.

This Certificate Replaces the Remaining Principal Amount of Convertible
Note: XXXX
     ---------

/S/ Michael A. Mulshine                              /S/ Laurence L. Osterwise
-----------------------                              -------------------------
Secretary                                            President

                                (CORPORATE SEAL)

DATE OF ISSUE:    XXXXXXXX
              -------------------
Editorial Note on Part 779
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54948, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 779 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93327, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 779.21 Soil resources information. ( a ) The applicant shall provide adequate soil survey information of the permit area consisting of the following: ( 1 ) A map delineating different soils;
( 2 ) Soil identification;
( 3 ) Soil description; and
( 4 ) Present and potential productivity of existing soils.
( b ) Where the applicant proposes to use selected overburden materials as a supplement or substitute for topsoil, the application shall provide results of the analyses, trials, and tests required under 30 CFR 816.22.
[44 FR 15354, Mar. 13, 1979, as amended at 81 FR 93327, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54948, Nov. 17, 2017] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For a document temporarily suspending § 779.21 in part, see 45 FR 51548, Aug. 4, 1980.
METAL / NONMETAL

Serious Accident

Phosphate/Surface – A miner operating a loaded articulated, haul truck 

drove through a berm and rolled the truck down the face of the dam. The 

miner was able to break out and crawl through the windshield and onto the

hood to wait for help to arrive. The miner was taken to a local hospital with 

serious injuries.

Best Practices

• Operate equipment in a manner that is consistent with conditions of 

roadways, grades, clearance, visibility, traffic, and the type of equipment 

used.

• Provide and maintain adequate berms and other barriers that are at least 

mid-axle high on the banks of roadways where a drop off exists.

• Train all employees on the equipment they operate, on safe job 

procedures, hazard recognition, and on hazard avoidance.

• Maintain control of equipment at all times during operation. Know the 

truck's capabilities, operating ranges, load-limits, and safety features.

• Monitor work activities and examine work areas to assure safe work 

practices are followed.

• Monitor contract employees adequately at all job sites to ensure that safe 

work procedures are being followed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0186 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DONALD RAY SAGE,

Defendant and Appellant.

**O RDER**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 9, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 3 2022

06/03/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0186
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 0 6 71 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 1 -NM - 0 96 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.1403-5 Criteria—Belt conveyors. ( a ) Positive-acting stop controls should be installed along all belt conveyors used to transport men, and such controls should be readily accessible and maintained so that the belt can be stopped or started at any location.
( b ) Belt conveyors used for regularly scheduled mantrips should be stopped while men are loading or unloading.
( c ) All belt conveyors used for the transportation of persons should have a minimum vertical clearance of 18 inches from the nearest overhead projection when measured from the edge of the belt and there should be at least 36 inches of side clearance where men board or leave such belt conveyors.
( d ) When men are being transported on regularly scheduled mantrips on belt conveyors the belt speed should not exceed 300 feet per minute when the vertical clearance is less than 24 inches, and should not exceed 350 feet per minute when the vertical clearance is 24 inches or more.
( e ) Adequate illumination including colored lights or reflective signs should be installed at all loading and unloading stations. Such colored lights and reflective signs should be so located as to be observable to all persons riding the belt conveyor.
( f ) After supplies have been transported on belt conveyors such belts should be examined for unsafe conditions prior to the transportation of men on regularly scheduled mantrips, and belt conveyors should be clear before men are transported.
( g ) A clear travelway at least 24 inches wide should be provided on both sides of all belt conveyors installed after March 30, 1970. Where roof supports are installed within 24 inches of a belt conveyor, a clear travelway at least 24 inches wide should be provided on the side of such support farthest from the conveyor.
( h ) On belt conveyors that do not transport men, stop and start controls should be installed at intervals not to exceed 1,000 feet. Such controls should be properly installed and positioned so as to be readily accessible.
( i ) Telephone or other suitable communications should be provided at points where men or supplies are regularly loaded on or unloaded from the belt conveyors.
( j ) Persons should not cross moving belt conveyors, except where suitable crossing facilities are provided.
Exhibit 32 (a)



Citizens Financial Corp.



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



I,
Robert J. Schoonover, President and Chief Executive Officer of Citizens Financial Corp. (the company) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



|1. | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the company for the annual period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |                         
|------------- |  | ------------------------
|Date: 3/10/04 |  | /s/ Robert J. Schoonover
|              |  | President               
|              |  | Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 23, 2015

t0916

Order 

Clerk

September 23, 2015

150841

HARBOR WATCH CONDOMINIUM

ASSOCIATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 150841

COA: 316858

Emmet CC: 12-103747-CZ

EMMET COUNTY TREASURER,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 4, 2014 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### § 707.10 Information collection.

Since the information collection requirement contained in 30 CFR 707.12 consists only of expenditures on information collection activities that would be incurred by persons in the normal course of their activities, it is exempt from the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*) and does not require clearance by OMB.

[64 FR 7482, Feb. 12, 1999]
EXHIBIT 32.1
------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 USC, SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  annual  report  of  Alpha  Spacecom,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 26, 2005 (the "Report"),  I,
the  undersigned,  in the capacity  and on the date  indicated  below,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C./  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: July 26, 2005                     s/Xuedong Hu
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Xuedong Hu, Chief Executive Officer/CFO