alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 779
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54948, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 779 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93327, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 779.25 Cross sections, maps, and plans. ( a ) The application shall include cross sections, maps, and plans showing— ( 1 ) Elevations and locations of test borings and core samplings;
( 2 ) Elevations and locations of monitoring stations used to gather data for water quality and quantity, fish and wildlife, and air quality, if required, in preparation of the application;
( 3 ) Nature, depth, and thickness of the coal seams to be mined, any coal or rider seams above the seam to be mined, each stratum of the overburden, and the stratum immediately below the lowest coal seam to be mined;
( 4 ) All coal crop lines and the strike and dip of the coal to be mined within the proposed permit area;
( 5 ) Location and extent of known workings of active, inactive, or abandoned underground mines, including mine openings to the surface within the proposed permit and adjacent areas;
( 6 ) Location and extent of sub-surface water, if encountered, within the proposed permit or adjacent areas;
( 7 ) Location of surface water bodies such as streams, lakes, ponds, springs, constructed or natural drains, and irrigation ditches within the proposed permit and adjacent areas;
( 8 ) Location and extent of existing or previously surface-mined areas within the proposed permit area;
( 9 ) Location and dimensions of existing areas of spoil, waste, and non-coal waste disposal, dams, embankments, other impoundments, and water treatment and air pollution control facilities within the proposed permit area;
( 10 ) Location, and depth if available, of gas and oil wells within the proposed permit area and water wells in the permit area and adjacent area;
( b ) Cross sections, maps and plans included in a permit application as required by this section shall be prepared by, or under the direction of, and certified by a qualified, registered, professional engineer, a professional geologist, or in any State which authorizes land surveyors to prepare and certify such cross sections, maps and plans, a qualified, registered, professional, land surveyor, with assistance from experts in related fields such as landscape architecture, and shall be updated as required by the regulatory authority.
[44 FR 15354, Mar. 13, 1979, as amended at 45 FR 51550, Aug. 4, 1980; 50 FR 16198, Apr. 24, 1985; 59 FR 27937, May 27, 1994; 81 FR 93327, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54948, Nov. 17, 2017]
#### Quotron Systems, Inc., Respondent, v Ivan E. Irizarry et al., Appellants.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on December 21, 1977, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without dis*688bursements. (See *Matter of Trans-Lux Corp. v Finance Administrator of City of N. Y.,*62 AD2d 962; *Matter of Crystal v City of Syracuse, Dept. of Assessment,*38 NY2d 883, affg 47 AD2d 29.) No opinion. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Silverman, Lane and Markewich, JJ.
Appeal No. 76-202.

#### State *v.*Grace C. Crescenzo.

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *Nancy Marks Rahmes,*Special Asst. Attorney General, for plaintiff.

*Nugent. & Nugent,*for defendant.-

The motion that the name of this case be amended to read *State*v. *Grace C. Crescenzo*is granted.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Raymond L. Auten.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, unless the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before September 11, 1962, with notice of argument for the October 1962 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur—Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.
From: Christensen, Joel To: SFI Stakeholder Meeting Subject: Potable Water Storage Facilities Inspections Date: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 4:21:19 PM

This is in response to the solicitation of comments in the Water Utility Insider November 7 Issue:

Nebraska requires inspection and cleaning, if needed, every 5 years. Records are produced during sanitary surveys. From our experience, this seems like an adequate, workable requirement.

Joel Christensen Metropolitan Utilities District of Omaha 402-504-7774
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.1101-10 Water sprinkler systems; fire warning devices at belt drives.

Each water sprinkler system shall be equipped with a device designed to stop the belt drive in the event of a rise in temperature and each such warning device shall be capable of giving both an audible and visual warning when a fire occurs.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

U.S.C. Section 1350,

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Devcon International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Richard Rochon, Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 14, 2007



|                               |  | 
|------------------------------ |  | 
|/s/ Richard Rochon             |  | 
|Richard Rochon                 |  | 
|Acting Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|(Principal Executive Officer)  |  |
#### In the Matter of the Claim of James Curry, Respondent, against New York City Omnibus Corp., Appellant. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from decision of Workmen’s Compensation Board from a finding of causal relationship and timeliness of notice in a “heart ease”. While repairing the- door of a bus on July 27, 1956, in the course of his employment, the claimant, 61 years of age, testified that the door was defective, the *547brackets were stuck and that it required on his part working in an awkward position and additional effort which caused severe pain in his chest followed by perspiration and required him to stop work and rest; that after lunch he resumed working on the bus door and again experienced the same pain, followed by profuse perspiring and that it was necessary for him to leave his work. Upon arriving home, he went to bed. He was thereafter examined on August 6 by a doctor who ordered him to the hospital where his condition was diagnosed as an acute coronary occlusion with myocardial infarction. The carrier questioned the credibility of the claimant due to changes made in his doctor’s report concerning the history of the occurrence and the circumstances surrounding his going to work on the morning of the accident. While carrier was justified in raising the issue, it being factual and supported by substantial evidence, the board’s finding in favor of the claimant is final. As to the relationship and notice, the claimant’s version as to the work he was doing, that he became ill and went home, was substantiated by his foreman. The board found that the medical testimony, while in dispute, established causal relationship. As to notice, the foreman knew of the claimant’s condition and that he left work early and the record discloses a letter dated August 27, 1956 from the attending physician of the claimant to the board and the company as to the medical aspects of the case and its association with the happening of the accident on July 27. The record does not disclose a timely objection as to late notice by the carrier but in any event the appellant had notice within such reasonable time to sustain the finding of no prejudice. It has been called to the board’s attention in *Matter of Buchanan*v. *Deposit Cent. School*(7 A D 2d 683, 684) that conelusory statements as to notice are not sufficient but proper findings stating the reasons for excusing compliance with section 18 are required. We are confronted here with a memorandum decision that “notice” among other requirements, was established and the finding that such failure was not prejudicial. The factual basis for such conclusions should be stated. Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
§ 77.1433 Examinations. ( a ) At least once every fourteen calendar days, each wire rope in service shall be visually examined along its entire active length for visible structural damage, corrosion, and improper lubrication or dressing. In addition, visual examination for wear and broken wires shall be made at stress points, including the area near attachments, where the rope rests on sheaves, where the rope leaves the drum, at drum crossovers, and at change-of-layer regions. When any visible condition that results in a reduction of rope strength is present, the affected portion of the rope shall be examined on a daily basis.
( b ) Before any person is hoisted with a newly installed wire rope or any wire rope that has not been examined in the previous fourteen calendar days, the wire rope shall be examined in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) At least once every six months, nondestructive tests shall be conducted of the active length of the rope, or rope diameter measurements shall be made— ( 1 ) Wherever wear is evident;
( 2 ) Where the hoist rope rests on sheaves at regular stopping points;
( 3 ) Where the hoist rope leaves the drum at regular stopping points; and
( 4 ) At drum crossover and change-of-layer regions.
( d ) At the completion of each examination required by paragraph (a) of this section, the person making the examination shall certify, by signature and date, that the examination has been made. If any condition listed in paragraph (a) of this standard is present, the person conducting the examination shall make a record of the condition and the date. Certifications and records of examinations shall be retained for one year.
( e ) The person making the measurements or nondestructive tests as required by paragraph (c) of this section shall record the measurements or test results and the date. This record shall be retained until the rope is retired from service.
[48 FR 53241, Nov. 25, 1983; 48 FR 54975, Dec. 8, 1983, 60 FR 33723, June 29, 1995]
EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the annual reportof CNB Corporation on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Paul R.Dusenbury, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the CNB Corporation,certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

1.    The above-listed Form 10-K fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or  15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the above-listed Form10-K fairly presents, in all  materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  March 8, 2005                           /s/PaulR. Dusenbury ________________                                               PaulR. Dusenbury                                               Treasurerand Chief Financial Officer
### §781. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–199, title VIII, §803(1), Dec. 17, 1993, 107 Stat. 2329

Section, act Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1024, title I, §2, 64 Stat. 987; Pub. L. 90–237, §1, Jan. 2, 1968, 81 Stat. 765, related to Congressional finding of necessity to control subversive activities.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Act Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1024, 64 Stat. 987, provided that: "This Act [enacting subchapters I to III of this chapter and section 1507 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, amending sections 137 to 137–8, 156, 456, 457, 704, 705, 725, 729, 733, 734, and 735 of Title 8, Aliens and Nationality, section 793 of Title 18, and sections 611 and 618 of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse, enacting provisions set out as notes under sections 781 and 811 of this title and section 792 of Title 18, and amending a provision set out as a note under section 402 of this title] may be cited as the 'Internal Security Act of 1950'."

Act Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1024, title I, §1(a), 64 Stat. 987, which provided that title I of act Sept. 23, 1950, which enacted this subchapter and section 1507 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, amended sections 137 to 137–8, 156, 456, 457, 704, 705, 725, 729, 733, 734, and 735 of Title 8, Aliens and Nationality, section 793 of Title 18, and sections 611 and 618 of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse, and enacted provisions set out as notes under section 781 of this title and section 792 of Title 18, be cited as the "Subversive Activities Control Act of 1950", was repealed by Pub. L. 103–199, title VIII, §803(1), Dec. 17, 1993, 107 Stat. 2329.

Act Aug. 24, 1954, ch. 886, §1, 68 Stat. 775, provided: "That this Act [enacting sections 792a and subchapter IV of this chapter, amending sections 782, 784, 785, 789 to 792, and 793 of this title, and enacting a provision set out as a note under section 841 of this title] may be cited as the 'Communist Control Act of 1954'."

#### Separability

Act Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1024, title I, §32, 64 Stat. 1019, provided: "If any provision of this title [see Short Title note above] or the application thereof to any person or circumstances, is held invalid, the remaining provisions of this title, or the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances, shall not be affected thereby."
Guía sobre la Preparación del Personal de 

Peluquerías y Salones de Uñas para el Virus COVID-19

OSHA se compromete a garantizar la salud y la seguridad de los trabajadores y lugares de trabajo en los 

Estados Unidos durante esta época sin precedentes. La agencia emitirá una serie de alertas específicas 

para varias industrias con el fin de mantener seguros a los trabajadores.

Si usted opera o trabaja en una peluquería o salón de unas, los 

siguientes consejos de seguridad le pueden ayudar a reducir el 

riesgo de exposición al coronavirus:

 Alentar que los trabajadores permanezcan en sus hogares si 

están enfermos. 

 Comprobar la temperatura del personal y llevar a cabo 

exámenes de bienestar antes de cada turno. 

 Requerir que los trabajadores usen equipo de protección personal. 

 Alentar que los clientes usen cubiertas faciales durante el servicio. 

 Alentar el distanciamiento físico a la espera de servicios, y orientar a los clientes esperar afuera o 

en sus vehículos hasta su cita. 

 Lavar y secar el pelo de los clientes antes de realizar cualquier trabajo y requerir a los clientes 

de los salones de uñas lavarse las manos o usar un desinfectante de manos antes de continuar 

con el servicio. 

 Utilice sistemas prepago o cajas de pago automático y proporcione un desinfectante de manos 

en el punto de venta. 

 Enfatizar la importancia de lavarse las manos con jabón y agua para los trabajadores y clientes. 

 Limpiar y desinfectar con frecuencia las superficies, herramientas y equipo. 

 Desalentar que los trabajadores compartan las herramientas. 

 Alentar que los trabajadores denuncien cualquiera preocupación acerca de la seguridad y la salud

en el trabajo.

Para más información, visite www.osha.gov/coronavirus o llame al 1-800-321-OSHA (6742).

Los avisos de OSHA se emiten en ocasiones para llamar la atención a 

asuntos y medidas de seguridad y salud de los trabajadores.

 • osha.gov/coronavirus • 1-800-321-OSHA (6742) • @OSHA_DOL

OSHA 4075-08 2020
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.1103-1 Automatic fire sensors.

A fire sensor system shall be installed on each underground belt conveyor. Sensors so installed shall be of a type which will (a) give warning automatically when a fire occurs on or near such belt; (b) provide both audible and visual signals that permit rapid location of the fire.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of First Community Financial Corporation, (the Company) for the period ended December 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Richard R. Leitzel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the
Report.



|                    |  |     |  |                                            
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Date: March 8, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Richard R. Leitzel                     
|                    |  |     |  | Richard R. Leitzel, Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 244 (Friday, December 18, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 82570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27959]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN COMMISSION

Projects Approved for Minor Modifications

AGENCY: Susquehanna River Basin Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists the minor modifications approved for a 
previously approved project by the Susquehanna River Basin Commission 
during the period set forth in ``DATES.''

DATES: November 1-30, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Susquehanna River Basin Commission, 4423 North Front Street, 
Harrisburg, PA 17110-1788.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason E. Oyler, General Counsel, 
telephone: (717) 238-0423, ext. 1312; fax: (717) 238-2436; email: 
[email protected]. Regular mail inquiries may be sent to the above 
address.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice lists previously approved 
projects, receiving approval of minor modifications, described below, 
pursuant to 18 CFR 806.18 or to Commission Resolution Nos. 2013-11 and 
2015-06 for the time period specified above:

Minor Modification Issued Under 18 CFR 806.18

    1. Northeast Marcellus Aqua Midstream I, LLC, Docket No. 20200919, 
Tunkhannock Township, Wyoming County, Pa.; approval to change intake 
design to add a temporary intake structure to allow withdrawals during 
low flow conditions when the existing permanent intake is inoperable; 
Approval Date: November 12, 2020.

    Authority: Pub. L. 91-575, 84 Stat. 1509 et seq., 18 CFR parts 
806, 807, and 808.

    Dated: December 15, 2020.
Jason E. Oyler,
General Counsel and Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2020-27959 Filed 12-17-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7040-01-P
```
§ 872.11 Where do moneys in the Fund come from? Revenue to the Fund includes— ( a ) Reclamation fees we collect under section 402 of SMCRA and part 870 of this chapter;
( b ) Amounts we collect from charges for use of land acquired or reclaimed with moneys from the Fund under part 879 of this chapter;
( c ) Moneys we recover through satisfaction of liens filed against privately owned lands reclaimed with moneys from the Fund under part 882 of this chapter;
( d ) Moneys we recover from the sale of lands acquired with moneys from the Fund or by donation;
( e ) Moneys donated to us for the purpose of abandoned mine land reclamation; and
( f ) Interest and any other income earned from investment of the Fund. We will credit interest and other income only to the Secretary's share.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTurbulence Measurements in the Near Field of a Wingtip VortexThe roll-up of a wingtip vortex, at Reynolds number based on chord of 4.6 million was studied with an emphasis on suction side and near wake measurements. The research was conducted in a 32 in. x 48 in. low-speed wind tunnel. The half-wing model had a semi-span of 36 in. a chord of 48 in. and a rounded tip. Seven-hole pressure probe measurements of the velocity field surrounding the wingtip showed that a large axial velocity of up to 1.77 U(sub infinity) developed in the vortex core. This level of axial velocity has not been previously measured. Triple-wire probes have been used to measure all components of the Reynolds stress tensor. It was determined from correlation measurements that meandering of the vortex was small and did not appreciably contribute to the turbulence measurements. The flow was found to be turbulent in the near-field (as high as 24 percent RMS w - velocity on the edge of the core) and the turbulence decayed quickly with streamwise distance because of the nearly solid body rotation of the vortex core mean flow. A streamwise variation of the location of peak levels of turbulence, relative to the core centerline, was also found. Close to the trailing edge of the wing, the peak shear stress levels were found at the edge of the vortex core, whereas in the most downstream wake planes they occurred at a radius roughly equal to one-third of the vortex core radius. The Reynolds shear stresses were not aligned with the mean strain rate, indicating that an isotropic-eddy-viscosity based prediction method cannot accurately model the turbulence in the cortex. In cylindrical coordinates, with the origin at the vortex centerline, the radial normal stress was found to be larger than the circumferential.Document ID19970011348Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsChow, Jim*(Institute for Defense Analyses Alexandria, VA United States)*Zilliac, Greg*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)*Bradshaw, Peter*(Stanford Univ. Stanford, CA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1997Subject CategoryAeronautics (General)Report/Patent NumberNASA-TM-110418A-961558NAS 1.15:110418Accession Number97N16274Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-59-53CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC2-55Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970011348.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024