alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
IMCLONE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-117968, 333-37746,
333-07339, 333-21417, 333-39067 and 333-67335) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-38620, 333-10275,
033-95894, 333-64825, 333-64827, 333-117995, 333-30172, 333-68534,333-101492 and 333-146579) of ImClone
Systems Incorporated of our reports dated February 29, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of ImClone Systems Incorporated and subsidiary as of December 31, 2007 and
2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2007, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, which reports appear in the December 31, 2007 annual report on
Form 10-K of ImClone Systems Incorporated. Our report on the consolidated financial statements refers to the Company's adoption of the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123R, "Share-Based Payment."

| | /s/ KPMG LLP
| | ------------

Princeton,
New Jersey
February 29, 2008

---



QuickLinks
#### Carol Mieszkowski, an Infant, et al., Respondents, v. Louis Gitter et al., Appellants, and Susan Korval et al., Respondents. Susan Korval, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, Alexander Korval, et al., Respondents, v. Louis Gitter et al., Appellants.

Motion by appellants for a stay, pending appeal, granted, on condition that appellants perfect the appeal and be ready to argue or submit it at the September Term, beginning September 10, 1962; *693appeal ordered on the calendar for said term. The record and appellants’ brief must be served and filed on or before July 16, 1962. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Hill, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 13.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Levon Resources Ltd (the "Company")
on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Form  20-F")  I Louis  Wolfin,
President (and acting Principal Executive),  of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:

     (1)  The Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934  (15  U.S.C.  78M or
          78o(d)); and

     (2)  The  information  contained in the Form 20-F fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: January 24, 2006                         /s/ Louis Wolfin
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Louis Wolfin, President
                                                (Principal Executive Officer)
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2023263EN.01015301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 26.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/153 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.11100 – MUTARES / WALOR INTERNATIONAL)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 263/06)

1.

On 19 July 2023, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2023263EN.01015301-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Mutares SE & Co. KGaA (‘Mutares’, Germany), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Walor International S.A.S. (‘Walor’, France). |

Mutares will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Walor.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Mutares is an investment company focusing on the acquisition of parts of large corporations and medium-sized companies in various sectors, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Walor manufactures and supplies parts and accessories for motor vehicles, including powertrains and steering systems, as well as components for the energy sector. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2023263EN.01015301-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.11100 – MUTARES / WALOR INTERNATIONAL

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2023263EN.01015301-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2023263EN.01015301-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
#### PLATT, Respondent, v. ELIAS et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 10, 1905.)

Action by John R. Platt against Hannah Elias and others. F. S. Black, for appellants. J. D. Warren, for respondent. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
### :}EmRTMENTO F BEFOR E TH E I-ETOPERATION S DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N ^ OFFIC E O F TH E SECRETAR Y;jncf:o_ 2 O U 7L i WASHINGTON , D.C

. 

## I t INTRA-ALASKAMAINLIN E

SERVIC E MAI LRATE S Docke tOST-2003-1469 5 (Docke tOST-95-429 )

UNITE D STATE S POSTA LSERVIC E COMMENT S O N ORDE R T O SHOWCAUS E ESTABLISHIN G NE W MAINLIN E SERVIC E MAI LRATE S
Th e Posta l Servic e ha s reviewe d Sho wCaus e Orde r10-2010-8-7 , an d ha s n o respons e t o th e overal l Order , bu twishe s t o commen to n a circumstanc e relatin g t o th e curren tfue l costs

. A s recite d i n th e las tquarterl yfue l update , Orde r2010-6-24 , Lynde n Ai rCarg o (Lynden ) understate d it s fue l cost s fo r2009 , discovere d it s erro ri n a year-en d interna l audit , an d include d a n adjustmen tfo rth e understatemen t i n it s 201 0 reports

. Whil e th e Posta l Servic e understand s tha tsuc h adjustment s leve l ou t ove rtime , the y impac tou rplannin g an d budgetin g i n th e shortrun
. W e ar e please d t o kno wtha t Lynde n ha s pu tne waccountin g procedure s i n plac e s o tha tsimila rerror s shoul d no t aris e i n it s futur e updates , allowin g th e Posta l Servic e allocat e it s fund s mor e accurately

. Thes e comment s hav e bee n provide d t o th e affecte d carriers

.
June 6, 1977.

Appeal No. 76-390.

#### State *v.*Gilbert Roddy *et al.*

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *Judith Romney Wegner,*Special Asst. Attorney General, for plaintiff.

*Abedon, Stanzler, Biener, Skolnik & Lipsey, Jordan Stanzler,*for defendants.

The defendants’ motion for an extension of time to file their brief is granted. The brief shall be filed on or before July 8, 1977.
§ 585.303 How long will my ROW grant or RUE grant remain in effect? The periods within the term of your grant are defined as follows: ( a ) Each ROW or RUE grant has a preliminary period of 12 months from the effective date of the ROW or RUE grant within which to submit a GAP. The preliminary period begins on the effective date of the grant. You must submit a GAP no later than the end of the preliminary period for your grant to remain in effect. However, you may submit a GAP before the issuance of your ROW or RUE grant.
( b ) Each ROW or RUE grant has an operations period as set by BOEM (if the grant is issued competitively) or negotiated with the applicant (if the grant is issued noncompetitively). In either case, the duration of the operations period will depend on the intended use of the grant. The operations period begins on the date that we approve your GAP.
( c ) You may request an extension of any of the grant periods outlined in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section for good cause. In its discretion, BOEM may approve your request.
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Discovery Oil Ltd, a Delaware corporation, (the Company) hereby certifies to such officers knowledge that:  1. This quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date:  May 21, 2007 /s/ Andrew Ippolito ________________________________ Andrew Ippolito President, Director, and Chief Financial Officer
#### TOPOLSKY, Appellant, v. GENERAL INCANDESCENT ARC LIGHT CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 24, 1905.)

Action by Stanislaus Topolsky against the General Incandescent Arc Light Company. M. Hilquit. for appellant. F. V. Johnson, for respondent. No opinion. Appeal from order dismissed, with $10 costs. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit 23.10

LOGO

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors

FNB United Corp.

Asheboro, North Carolina

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 33-72686, 333-54702, 333-99333, 333-105442, 333-109450, 333-133734, 333-143703, and 333-144132) on Form S-8 and the registration statements (Nos. 33-59565 and 333-158219)
on Form S-3 of FNB United Corp. (the Corporation) of our reports dated April 14, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of FNB United Corp. and Subsidiary, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, which reports appear in FNB United Corp.s December 31, 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our report dated April 14, 2010 relating to the consolidated financial statements included an explanatory paragraph relating
to the existence of substantial doubt about the Corporations ability to continue as a going concern.

LOGO

Charlotte, North Carolina

April 14, 2010
Docket number: FAA - 2014 - 0748
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO LEASE  February 27, 2009
 West Point Holdings, LLC Sedona Corporation.
 October 31, 2003, 630
rentable square feet 13895 Industrial Park Blvd,
Plymouth, MN 55441
  1.
    
    Landlord and Tenant agree that the Leased Premises shall be Suite 105, 13895
Industrial Park Blvd, Plymouth
MN 55441 and the Rentable Area shall consist of 894 rentable square feet.2.
    
    Building Expense Percentage: 5.35%3.
    
    Commencing on May 1, 2009 (Commencement Date) the lease term shall be
extended for Twenty-Four (24)
months and terminating on April 30, 2011 (Termination Date). The monthly
Base Rental as defined in the
Lease shall be as follows:
 Month
    
    Base Rent PSF/Annum
    
    Monthly Base RentMay 1, 2009 - April 30, 2010
    
    $
    7.85
    
    
    $
    585.00May 1, 2010-April 30, 2011
    
    $
    8.12
    
    
    $
    605.00
  4.
    
    Additional Rent. In addition to the above monthly Base Rental, Tenant shall
continue to be responsible for its
Proportionate Share of the Operating Expenses, Real Estate Taxes and Common Areas together
with all other
sums of money that become due and payable by Tenant to Landlord under the terms of the
Lease. Tenant to
include an additional five hundred eight dollars and nine cents ($508.09) per
month with the Base Rental
payment as an estimated amount for actual Operating Expenses, Real Estate Taxes and Common
Areas for the
year 2009, subject to adjustment per the Lease.5.
    
    Tenant Improvements. Landlord is providing the Premises during the
Extension Term in its current AS IS
condition, without representation or warranty of any kind. Landlord shall have no
obligation to make any
modifications or alterations to the Premises, except to create air-flow in the server
room. Landlord shall
complete the Tenant Improvements at Landlords sole cost and expense; not to exceed One
Thousand Dollars
($1,000.00)6.
    
    Renewal Option. Tenant shall have one (1) option to renew their lease for
two (2) years at the then determined
current market rates by giving Landlord written notice no later than nine (9) months prior
to Termination Date.7.
    
    Tenant acknowledges that it has not utilized the services of any real estate firm
other than Coldwell Banker
Commercial Griffin Companies and NorthMarq Real Estate Brokerage LLC in this transaction.
  LANDLORD:
    
    
    
    TENANT:West Point Holdings, LLC
    
    
    
    Sedona CorporationBy:
    
    /s/ Craig Zoellner
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Anita
M. PrimoIts:
    
    Manager
    
    
    
    
    
    Its:
    
    Vice President, CFODate: 3/30/09
    
    
    
    Date: 3.19.08
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

     Pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  created  by  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of GPS Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

                  (i) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the
         quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

                  (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


Dated:  May 21, 2007           /s/ ROBERT C. SILZER, SR.
                                   -------------------------
                                   Robert C. Silzer, Sr.
                                   Chief Executive Officer
#### § 72.800T Single, full-shift measurement of respirable coal mine dust.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 28479, Apr. 18, 2024.

The Secretary will use a single, full-shift measurement of respirable coal mine dust to determine the average concentration on a shift since that measurement accurately represents atmospheric conditions to which a miner is exposed during such shift. As of April 14, 2025, noncompliance with the respirable dust standard, in accordance with this subchapter, is demonstrated when a single, full-shift measurement taken by MSHA meets or exceeds the applicable ECV in table 1 to § 70.208, table 1 to § 70.209, table 1 to § 71.206, or table 1 to § 90.207 of this chapter that corresponds to the particular sampling device used. Upon issuance of a citation for a violation of the standard, and for MSHA to terminate the citation, the mine operator shall take the specified actions in this subchapter.

[89 FR 28479, Apr. 18, 2024]
#### In the Matter of Diana Deubel, Respondent, v. Bernard M. Kahn, Appellant.

Appeal from order of Family Court, denying defendant’s motion for an examination before trial in a paternity proceeding, dismissed, without costs. Appeals to the Appellate Division from orders of the Family Court may only be taken as of right from orders of disposition (Family Court Act, § 1012). An order of disposition is one that follows after a hearing upon a petition (§ 833) and makes one of the determinations on that petition set out in section 841. Appeals from any other order are discretionary with the Appellate Division (§ 1012). As no application for leave to appeal was made, the appeal is not properly before the court. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
#### § 918.25 Approval of Louisiana abandoned mine land reclamation plan amendments.

The following is a list of the dates amendments were submitted to OSM, the dates when the Director's decision approving all, or portions of these amendments, were published in the Federal Register and the State citations or a brief description of each amendment. The amendments in this table are listed in order of the date of final publication in the Federal Register.

| Original amendment submission date | Date of final publication | Citation/description |
| --- | --- | --- |
| February 3, 1986 | November 10, 1986 | Approval of AMLR program. |
| June 12, 1989 | April 9, 1990 | Certification for Noncoal reclamation. |
| March 4, 2010 | March 9, 2011 | Section 8509. |

[62 FR 9944, Mar. 5, 1997, as amended at 76 FR 12856, Mar. 9, 2011]
#### Charles Watkins et al., Respondents, v. Harris J. Shapiro, Appellant. (Action No. 1.) Gladys Watkins, Plaintiff, v. Harry Shapiro, Defendant. (Action No. 2.) Harris J. Shapiro, Plaintiff, v. Gladys Watkins, Defendant. (Action No. 3.)

In three actions, consolidated and tried together, Action No. 1 being by the female plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries and by her husband for medical expenses and loss of her services; Action No. 2 being by the female plaintiff to recover for damages to her automobile; and Action No. 3 being by defendant Shapiro against the female plaintiff to recover for damages to his automobile, the said defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered February 24, 1960, on a jury verdict in Action No. 1 of $12,000 in favor of the female plaintiff and $6,000 in favor of her husband, after a jury trial. Judgment insofar as it is in favor of the female plaintiff in Action No. 1, and insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. Judgment insofar as it is in favor of her husband in Action No. 1, reversed on the facts, said action severed as to him, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless, within 20 days after the entry of the order hereon, he shall stipulate to reduce to $3,000 the amount of the verdict in his favor, in which event the judgment in his favor, as so reduced, is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion the verdict in favor of the plaintiff-husband, is excessive and should be reduced to the extent indicated. Beldock, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
# C_2023344EN.01022501.xml

| 29.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/225 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/225

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 344/16)

| Member State | Estonia |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned routes | Tartu – Helsinki |
| Period of validity of the contract | 1 January 2024 – 31 December 2027 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | Two months after the date of publication of this notice |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligations can be obtained | City of Tartu |
| City Government |
| Raekoja plats 1a (Raekoda) |
| 50089 Tartu |
| ESTONIA |

Member State

Estonia

Concerned routes

Tartu – Helsinki

Period of validity of the contract

1 January 2024 – 31 December 2027

Deadline for submission of tenders

Two months after the date of publication of this notice

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligations can be obtained

City of Tartu

City Government

Raekoja plats 1a (Raekoda)

50089 Tartu

ESTONIA

Tel. +372 7361111

Email: mailto:tartupso@tartu.ee

Internet: www.tartu.ee/pso

---
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


The Dealer Sheet, Inc.
7858 E. Long Place
Centennial, Colorado 80112




     The undersigned  consents to the use of its opinion dated October 31, 2002,
relating to the  financial  statements  of The Dealer  Sheets,  Inc.,  a Coloado
Corporation,  and to the reference to the firm under  "Experts," all as included
in the Registration Statement on Form SB-1.






Torrance, California                 s/ Jonathon P. Reuben C.P.A
                                     ---------------------------
December 3, 2002                     Jonathon P. Reuben, C.P.A.
                                     An Accountancy Corporation
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                     SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                           $       576
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                        117,342
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                           29,503
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     152,820
<PP&E>                               168,474
<DEPRECIATION>                        92,732
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       285,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 90,371
<BONDS>                               88,283
<COMMON>                               8,486
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                            28,088
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         285,768
<SALES>                              416,924
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     416,924
<CGS>                                393,395
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        393,395
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      18,797
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     3,475
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        1,595
<INCOME-TAX>                             530
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    2,125
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                           2,125
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0
        

</TABLE>