alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10-B-8: COPY OF RESOLUTION



 



Exhibit 10-b-8



ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC.



RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

ON DECEMBER 1, 1999








			
	 	         RESOLVED, that effective upon approval of the 2000 Plan
by the shareowners as hereinabove provided, this
Corporation’s 1995 Long-Term Incentives Plan (the “1995
Plan”) be, and it hereby is, amended by deleting the proviso
to Section 4 (a) (i) and substituting therefor:




	 	 	 	“provided that no Performance Cycle shall begin
later than September 30, 1998, and only one
Performance Cycle for Rockwell or any
designated business component shall begin
with any one fiscal year;”	 




			
	 	by deleting the first sentence of Section 10 (a) and
substituting therefor:




	 	 	 	“The total number of Shares which
may be delivered in payment and upon exercise of
Grants and in payments of awards under
Performance Plans shall not exceed 12.5 million,
as adjusted from time to time as herein provided,
and the total number of Shares as to which Grants
may be made in any one fiscal year of the
Corporation shall not exceed 1 1/2% of the
total number of Shares outstanding and held in
Treasury as of the date of determination.”	 




			
	 	and by deleting Section 10 (c) and substituting therefor:




	 	 	 	“(c) No Option, Freestanding Stock Appreciation
Right or Restricted Stock shall be granted under the
Plan or any Supplementary Stock Plan after February 2,
2000, but Options or Stock Appreciation Rights and
Restricted Stock granted theretofore may extend beyond
that date, and Tandem Stock Appreciation Rights may be
granted after that date with respect to Options
outstanding on that date.”
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.331 Auxiliary fans and tubing. ( a ) When auxiliary fans and tubing are used for face ventilation, each auxiliary fan shall be— ( 1 ) Permissible, if the fan is electrically operated;
( 2 ) Maintained in proper operating condition;
( 3 ) Deenergized or shut off when no one is present on the working section; and
( 4 ) Located and operated to avoid recirculation of air.
( b ) If a deficiency exists in any auxiliary fan system, the deficiency shall be corrected or the auxiliary fan shall be deenergized immediately.
( c ) If the air passing through an auxiliary fan or tubing contains 1.0 percent or more methane, power to electrical equipment in the working place and to the auxiliary fan shall be deenergized, and other mechanized equipment in the working place shall be shut off until the methane concentration is reduced to less than 1.0 percent.
( d ) When an auxiliary fan is stopped— ( 1 ) Line brattice or other face ventilation control devices shall be used to maintain ventilation to affected faces; and
( 2 ) Electrical equipment in the affected working places shall be disconnected at the power source, and other mechanized equipment shall be shut off until ventilation to the working place is restored.
Exhibit 10.1

TD Bank, N.A.
Commercial Lending
1000 MacArthur Boulevard
Mahwah, NJ 07430
F:  201-236-1752
www.tdbank.com


May 10, 2010

The Dewey Electronics Corporation
27 Mueller Road
Oakland, NJ 07436
ATTN:  Mr. John Dewey

Re:   Commercial Line of Credit - Loan #1574730-9001 dated 4/20/09 in
      the Amount of $500,000.00 (as amended, modified or supplemented,
      the "Note")

Dear Mr. Dewey:

We are pleased to inform you that pursuant to the terms of the Note
referenced above, this letter constitutes written notice that the Note
has been renewed for a period of 18 months and shall mature on 10/31/2011
(the "Maturity Date") unless extended in writing by the Bank in its sole
and absolute discretion.  Borrower hereby acknowledges that usage of the
Line of Credit subsequent to the current maturity date is Borrower's
acceptance and agreement that the Borrower continues to be legally bound
by the loan documents and except as expressly set forth in this letter,
all terms, conditions and provisions of the Note and each of the other
loan documents, are hereby ratified and confirmed and continue unchanged
and in full force and effect.

TD Bank, N.A. thanks you for your business and looks forward to
continuing to service your lending needs.  If you have any questions with
regard to the information contained in this letter, please do not
hesitate to contact Juan Oelofse at 201-236-2794.

Very Truly Yours,

TD Bank, N.A.

/s/ Juan Oelofse
Juan Oelofse
Vice President
#### § 582.41 Method of royalty calculation.

In the event that the provisions of royalty management regulations in part 1206 of chapter XII do not apply to the specific commodities produced under regulations in this part, the lessee shall comply with procedures specified in the leasing notice.
#### § 77.514 Switchboards; passageways and clearance.

Switchboards shall be installed to provide passageways or lanes of travel which permit access to the back of the switchboard from both ends for inspection, adjustment or repair. Openings permitting access to the rear of any switchboard shall be guarded, except where they are located in buildings which are kept locked.
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.902-2 Approved ground check systems not employing pilot check wires.

Ground check systems not employing pilot check wires will be approved only if it is determined that the system includes a fail safe design causing the circuit breaker to open when ground continuity is broken.
Appeal No. 75-270.

#### Virginia Black *v.*Andrew Black.

The parties are directed to brief the following question:

Did the defendant, by filing an answer on the merits following the denial of his motion to dismiss, submit himself personally to the jurisdiction of the Superior Court with respect to both the original complaint and the subsequently filed supplemental complaint? *See*Kent, *Rhode Island Practice*§12.17, at 122-23 (1969).

The defendant’s brief shall be filed on or before May 6, 1977; the plaintiff’s brief shall be filed not more than 14 days after *924the filing of the defendant’s brief.

*Henry H. Katz,*for plaintiff.

*John Gorham,*for defendant.
Exhibit 32


                         CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  each  of the
undersigned   certifies  that  the  periodic  report  fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and that information  contained in this periodic report fairly presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of The
Deltona Corporation as of September 30, 2003.


/S/ Antony Gram
-----------------------------
Antony Gram
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
October 15, 2003



/S/ Robert O. Moore
-----------------------------
Robert O. Moore
Chief Financial Officer
October 15, 2003


     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
other  document  authenticating,  acknowledging  ,  or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written  statement  required by Section  906,  has been  provided to The Deltona
Corporation and will be retained by The Deltona Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

     The foregoing  certification  accompanies the issuer's  quarterly report on
Form 10-Q for the period ending  September 30, 2003 and is not filed as provided
in SEC Release Nos. 33-8238, 33-8212, 34-4751 and IC-25967.

     Pursuant  to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  each of the
undersigned   certifies  that  the  periodic  report  fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and that information  contained in this periodic report fairly presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of The
Deltona Corporation.


/S/ Antony Gram
-------------------------------
Antony Gram
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
October 15, 2003



/S/ Robert O. Moore
--------------------------------
Robert O. Moore
Chief Financial Officer
October 15, 2003


     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to The Deltona  Corporation  and will be retained by The Deltona
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

     The foregoing  certification  accompanies the issuer's  Quarterly report on
Form 10-Q and is not filed as provided in SEC Release Nos. 33-8212,  34-4751 and
IC-25967, dated September 30, 2003.
Appendix 4.3

US Department of Agriculture Comments on the Kansas

Regional Haze SIP
§ 581.43 Effect of suspensions on lease term. ( a ) If the BSEE Director orders the suspension of either operations or production, or both, with respect to any lease in its primary term, the primary term of the lease shall be extended by a period of time equivalent to the period of the directed suspension.
( b ) If the BSEE Director orders or approves the suspension of either operations or production, or both, with respect to any lease that is in force beyond its primary term, the term of the lease shall not be deemed to expire so long as the suspension remains in effect.
#### § 57.5075 Diesel particulate records.

(a) The table entitled “Diesel Particulate Matter Recordkeeping Requirements” lists the records the operator must maintain pursuant to [§§ 57.5060](/on/2024-09-16/title-30/section-57.5060) through [57.5071](/on/2024-09-16/title-30/section-57.5071), and the duration for which particular records need to be retained.

Table [57.5075](/on/2024-09-16/title-30/section-57.5075)(a)—Diesel Particulate Recordkeeping Requirements

| Record | Section reference | Retention time |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. Approved application for extension of time to comply with exposure limits | § 57.5060(c) | Duration of extension. |
| 2. Identity of PLHCP and most recent written determination of miner's ability to wear a respirator | § 57.5060(d) | Duration of miner's employment plus 6 months. |
| 3. Purchase records noting sulfur content of diesel fuel | § 57.5065(a) | 1 year beyond date of purchase. |
| 4. Maintenance log | § 57.5066(b) | 1 year after date any equipment is tagged. |
| 5. Evidence of competence to perform maintenance | § 57.5066(c) | 1 year after date maintenance performed. |
| 6. Annual training provided to potentially exposed miners | § 57.5070(b) | 1 year beyond date training completed. |
| 7. Record of corrective action | § 57.5071(c) | Until the corrective action is completed. |
| 8. Sampling method used to effectively evaluate a miner's personal exposure, and sample results | § 57.5071(d) | 5 years from sample date. |

(b)

(1) Any record listed in this section which is required to be retained at the mine site may, notwithstanding such requirement, be retained elsewhere if the mine operator can immediately access the record from the mine site by electronic transmission.

(2) Upon request from an authorized representative of the Secretary of Labor, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, or from the authorized representative of miners, mine operators must promptly provide access to any record listed in the table in this section.

(3) An operator must provide access to a miner, former miner, or, with the miner's or former miner's written consent, a personal representative of a miner, to any record required to be maintained pursuant to [§ 57.5071](/on/2024-09-16/title-30/section-57.5071) or [§ 57.5060(d)](/on/2024-09-16/title-30/section-57.5060#p-57.5060(d)) to the extent the information pertains to the miner or former miner. The operator must provide the first copy of a requested record at no cost, and any additional copies at reasonable cost.

(4) Whenever an operator ceases to do business, that operator must transfer all records required to be maintained by this part, or a copy thereof, to any successor operator who must maintain them for the required period.

[[70 FR 32966](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/70-FR-32966), June 6, 2005; [70 FR 37901](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/70-FR-37901), June 30, 2005; [71 FR 29012](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/71-FR-29012), May 18, 2006]
#### § 77.504 Electrical connections or splices; suitability.

Electrical connections or splices in electric conductors shall be mechanically and electrically efficient, and suitable connectors shall be used. All electrical connections or splices in insulated wire shall be reinsulated at least to the same degree of protection as the remainder of the wire.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MUKHABBAT REMINES and MURAT RAKHMANKULOV

, Appellant s

,

v.

BRYAN REMINES

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 356

[ July 30, 2020 ]

Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Nikolaus Hunter Davis , Judge; L.T.

Case No. FMCE17015063

.

Gary Grant of Grant Law Corporation, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellant s

.

Hollis E. Mandell of the L aw O ffice of Hollis E . Mandell, Fort Lauderdale,

for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, C.J., D AMOORGIAN and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### In the Matter of Helen Schneider, Petitioner, v Board of Education of the East Ramapo Central School District et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, *inter alia,*to review a determination of the respondent board of education, dated February 4, 1976, which, after a hearing, found petitioner guilty of certain charges of conduct unbecoming a teacher and neglect of duty and dismissed her from her position as a teacher. Petition granted to the extent that the determination is modified, on the law, by: (1) deleting therefrom the finding of guilt as to all charges except "C”, "J” and "M”; and (2) deleting therefrom the penalty of dismissal and substituting therefor a provision that the penalty shall be a "memo of reprimand” in accordance with the recommendation of the majority of the hearing panel. As so modified, determination confirmed, without costs or disbursements, respondents are directed to reinstate petitioner to her classroom duties, with back pay, less the amount of compensation earned in any other employment or occupation and any unemployment benefits she may have received, and proceeding remitted to Special Term for a determination, after a hearing, of whether back pay should be further reduced in accordance with the guidelines set forth in our decision in *Matter of Short v Nassau County Civ. Serv. Comm.*(59 AD2d 157). The administrative proceedings herein were completed prior to April 15, 1977, the effective date of the amendment of section 3020-a of the Education Law, which amendment eliminates review by the employing board of determinations of a hearing panel (see L 1977, ch 82). the hearing panel sustained 3 of the 13 charges ("C”, "J” and "M”) and the majority of the panel recommended no more than a written reprimand. Respondents, reviewing the record, determined that most of the remaining charges had also been sustained and dismissed petitioner. Upon our review of the entire record of the extensive hearings, we conclude that the findings of guilt as to charges other than "C”, "J” and "M” are not supported by substantial evidence. The findings herein sustained do not support any sanction beyond that determined by the majority of the members of the hearing panel. Certainly, the punishment of dismissal was so disproportionate to the offenses as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see *Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222, 233). We have modified the punishment accordingly. The amount of back pay to which petitioner is entitled will depend, *inter alia,*upon a determination by Special Term of the "outside time limit within which petitioner could have reasonably been expected” to prosecute and perfect this article 78 proceeding (see *Matter of Short v Nassau County Civ. Serv. Comm.,*59 AD2d 157, 170, *supra).*We note, for example, that the order of transfer to this court (see CPLR 7804, subd [g]) was signed in June, 1976, but petitioner’s brief was not filed until June, 1977. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6079

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DANIEL LEE SUGGS , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. R. Bryan Harwell, Chief District Judge. ( 4:06

- cr - 00474

- RBH

- 2 ; 4:16

- cv - 01545

- RBH )

Submitted : April 16, 2020 Decided: April 21, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Daniel Lee Suggs, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Danie l Lee Suggs seeks to appeal the district court’s order s denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 (201 8 ) motion and denying his motion for reconsideration . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ) (201 8 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (201 8 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating th at reasonable jurists would find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134,
140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Suggs has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Suggs’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and lega l contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
##### 



AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE
  Whereas, the original payment dates of the Note were (the Payment Dates:) as
follows: one half of the principal sum upon the earlier of: (a) ten (10) days after a closing
of the purchase or debt and/or equity securities of the Borrower arranged by Stonegate
Securities, Inc.; or (b) sixty (60) days from the October 23, 2006; and (b) the balance of
principal, together with all accrued interest on October 23, 2007; andWhereas,Lender and the Borrower previously entered into several extensions of the
Payment Dates and desire to further extend the Payment Dates;Whereas,Borrower has made no payments under the Note to date; andWhereas,Borrower and the Lender desire to further extend the Maturity Date;Now Therefore, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree to amend the Note as follows:
 1.
    
    The Maturity Date of the Note shall be further extended until January 1, 2009.2.
    
    To effectuate the foregoing:
 PAYMENT
 PAYMENT. The principal balance of the Note, plus all accrued and unpaid interest
shall be due and payable on January 1, 2009. Unless otherwise agreed or required by
applicable law, payments will be applied first to accrued unpaid interest, then to
principal, and any remaining amount to any unpaid collection cost and late charges.
The annual interest rate for this Note is computed on a 365/360 basis; that is, by
applying the ratio of the annual interest rate over a year of 360 days, multiplied
by the outstanding principal balance, multiplied by the actual number of days the
principal balance is outstanding. Borrower will pay Lender at Lenders address
shown above or at such other place as Lender may designate in writing
 3.
    
    Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them
in the Note.




---



##### 



4.
    
    Except as amended by this Amendment, the Note shall remain in full force and
effect, enforceable in accordance with its terms and Maker hereby reaffirms and
acknowledges all of its obligations thereunder.
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 David R. VeySedona CorporationBy:
    Marco Emrich, President -2-
### Fw: could you please send me the RIA document you mentioned today which has the county info on ozone secondary standard ? Ron Evans to: Thomas.Grahame 11/09/2009 01:38 PM Cc: "King, Heidi R.", Amy Lamson, Tricia Crabtree Tom, Amy forwarded your request to me. She has provided me with information you have requested which I am forwarding here. Please let us know if you have any questions based on this. In the future, please send any requests you have about the RIAs thru me, I will make sure you get information you need. I realize this was a special request based on Amy's statement during the meeting, no harm done.

Ron Evans Leader, Air Benefit & Cost Group HEID/OAQPS/OAR/EPA Mail Drop C-439-02 919-541-5488 919-541-0839 fax Attached is the requested document. The relevant sections are S4-2 through S4-7.

----- Forwarded by Amy Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US on 11/09/2009 01:22 PM -----

From: "Grahame, Thomas" <Thomas.Grahame@HQ.DOE.GOV> To: Amy Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 11/09/2009 01:13 PM Subject: could you please send me the RIA document you mentioned today which has the county info on ozone secondary standard?
Amy, this would save me time, if you could do me the favor of sending me the document, and telling me where to look for the county info? Thanks, Tom Thomas J. Grahame U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 202 586 7149 (voice)202 586 7085 (fax)