alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 77.904 Identification of circuit breakers.

Circuit breakers shall be labeled to show which circuits they control unless identification can be made readily by location.
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.522-1 Incandescent and fluorescent lamps. ( a ) Except for areas of a coal mine inby the last open crosscut, incandescent lamps may be used to illuminate underground areas. When incandescent lamps are used in a track entry or belt entry or near track entries to illuminate special areas other than structures, the lamps shall be installed in weather-proof sockets located in positions such that the lamps will not come in contact with any combustible material. Lamps used in all other places must be of substantial construction and be fitted with a glass enclosure.
( b ) Incandescent lamps within glass enclosures or fluorescent lamps may be used inside underground structures (except magazines used for the storage of explosives and detonators). In underground structures lighting circuits shall consist of cables installed on insulators or insulated wires installed in metallic conduit or metallic armor.
§ 775.13 Judicial review. ( a ) *General.* Any applicant or any person with an interest which is or may be adversely affected and who has participated in the administrative hearings as an objector may appeal as provided in paragraph (b) or (c) of this section if— ( 1 ) The applicant or person is aggrieved by the decision of the hearing authority in the administrative hearing conducted pursuant to § 775.11 of this chapter; or
( 2 ) Either the regulatory authority or the hearing authority for administrative review under § 775.11 of this chapter fails to act within applicable time limits specified in the Act, this chapter, or the regulatory program.
( b ) *Judicial review under State programs.* The action of the hearing authority identified in paragraph (a) of this section shall be subject to judicial review by a court of competent jurisdiction, as provided for in the State program, but the availability of such review shall not be construed to limit the operation of the rights established in section 520 of the Act.
( c ) *Judicial review under Federal programs and Federal lands programs.* The action of the hearing authority identified in paragraph (a) of this section is subject to judicial review by the U.S. District Court for the district where the coal exploration or surface coal mining and reclamation operation is or would be located, except for judicial review of State regulatory authority actions in a State court of competent jurisdiction as may be provided for in a cooperative agreement, in the time and manner provided for in section 526 (a)(2), (b) and (e) of the Act. The availability of such review shall not be construed to limit the operation of the rights established in section 520 of the Act.
#### TRENHOLM v. PROVIDENT SAV. LIFE ASSUR. SOC. OF NEW YORK.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

June 22, 1903.)

1. Appeal—Findings of Fact—Review.

Plaintiff having, on a second trial, testified to a different date for the agreement from that given by him on the first trial, and his testimony being contradicted, the finding against him will not be disturbed on appeal.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Tenth District.

Action by William D. Trenholm against the Provident Savings Life Assurance Society of New York. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and GILDERSLEEVE and MacLEAN, JJ.

Frank Trenholm, for appellant.

William T. Gilbert, for respondent.

FREEDMAN, P. J.

This action was brought to recover the sum of $159.50 damages for an alleged breach of contract to repair an apartment leased by plaintiff, and sublet by him to one Reimer. The action has been tried twice. Upon the first trial the plaintiff had a judgment, which was reversed by this court, and a new trial ordered. Upon the new trial the defendant had a judgment, from which the plaintiff appeals.

Upon the -first trial the plaintiff testified in his own favor, and his evidence was to the effect that the alleged agreement to repair was made by him with the defendant subsequent to the making of the lease, and Mr. Justice Giegerich, in writing the opinion, said:

> “It does not appear that the defendant was bound, either by the terms of the original letting or the renewal thereof, to make any repairs. He was therefore under no obligation as landlord to make any, and the alleged promise made subsequently to the renewal was without consideration. Bronner v. Walter, 15 App. Div. 295-297, 44 N. Y. Supp. 583.”

Upon the present trial the plaintiff was again the only witness testifying in his favor to the making of the alleged contract, and he now fixes the time of such making as prior to the making of the lease. In this he is contradicted by the agent of the defendant, with whom the lease was made. Under such circumstances, what credence should be placed upon the plaintiff’s testimony was wholly for the trial judge to determine, and his decision should stand.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.
**Exhibit 23**
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-17642,Form S-8 No. 33-45131, Form S-8 No. 33-45132, Form S-8 No. 33-62863, Form S-8 No. 33-64860, FormS-8 No. 33-72494, Form S-8 No. 33-77586, Form S-8 No. 33-77590, Form S-8 No. 333-74873, Form S-8No. 333-68103, Form S-8 No. 333-61089, Form S-8 No. 333-28009, Form S-8 No. 333- 89127, Form S-3 No. 333-90560, Form S-8 No. 333-101328, Form S-8 No.333-111487, Form S-8 No. 333-111488 and Form S-8 No. 333-122942) of Intervoice, Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports datedMay 13, 2005 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Intervoice, Inc.and subsidiaries, Intervoice, Inc. and subsidiaries management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting of Intervoice Inc, and subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for theyear ended February 28, 2005.    /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLPDallas, Texas  May 13, 2005
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2013 - 0145 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2012 - SW - 059 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### 12JWZFN978 **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s , list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the co mments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
#### § 77.202 Dust accumulations in surface installations.

Coal dust in the air of, or in, or on the surfaces of, structures, enclosures, or other facilities shall not be allowed to exist or accumulate in dangerous amounts.
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.803-1 Maximum voltage ground check circuits.

The maximum voltage used for ground check circuits under § 75.803 shall not exceed 96 volts.
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.902-1 Maximum voltage ground check circuits.

The maximum voltage used for such ground check circuits shall not exceed 40 volts.
§ 57.6100 Separation of stored explosive material. ( a ) Detonators shall not be stored in the same magazine with other explosive material.
( b ) When stored in the same magazine, blasting agents shall be separated from explosives, safety fuse, and detonating cord to prevent contamination.
**Exhibit 15**

 

 

May 13, 2003

 

The Board of Directors

Credit Suisse First Boston(USA), Inc.

New York, New York

 

Re:  Registration statements No. 333-86720, 333-71850, 333-62422,333-07657, 333-34149, 333-53499, 333-73405 and 333-30928

 

With respect to the subjectregistration statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of ourreport dated May 13, 2003 related to our review of interim financialinformation.

 

Pursuant to Rule 436 under theSecurities Act of 1933 (the “Act”), such report is not considered part of aregistration statement prepared or certified by an accountant, or a reportprepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7and 11 of the Act.

 

 
| /s/ KPMG            |   |
|---------------------|--------|
|                |
| New York,  New York |

 

----
DAILY READING FILE 

JJ 

m 0 

rn 

rn 

NEWARK E XAS 

Ms. Lisa Jackson 

Administrator of USEPA 

USEPA Headquarters 

12000 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Mail Code: 1101A 

Washington, DC 20460

RE:	ATTENTION DOCKET ID NO. EPA-HQOar-2008-0476 

RESOLUTION OPPOSITION WITH REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION AND CALL FOR 

CONGRESSIONAL INTERVENTION IN THE MATTER OF WISE COUNTY, TEXAS BEING 

DESIGNATED AS A MEMBER OF DALLAS-FORT WORTH (DFW) AREA NAAQS 2012 EIGHT 

HOUR OZONE NONATFAINMENT AREA. 

Dear Director Jackson: 

On behalf of the Newark City Council, Newark, Wise County, Texas, please accept this letter 

with attached Newark City Council Resolution No. 274 as official notice of request for re-review 

and reconsideration of your Conclusion Decision to add Wise County to the DEW Area 

nonattainment designation. 

Matt Newby 

Mayor 

Newark City Council 

Newark, Wise County, Texas 

cc:	Caryn Dunn 

Administrative Coordinator 

Wise County 

P.O. Box 393 

Decatur, TX 76234
### §50113. Acquisition of space science data

(a) Definition of Space Science Data.—In this section, the term "space science data" includes scientific data concerning—

(1) the elemental and mineralogical resources of the moon, asteroids, planets and their moons, and comets;

(2) microgravity acceleration; and

(3) solar storm monitoring.

(b) Acquisition From Commercial Providers.—The Administrator shall, to the extent possible and while satisfying the scientific or educational requirements of the Administration, and where appropriate, of other Federal agencies and scientific researchers, acquire, where cost effective, space science data from a commercial provider.

(c) Treatment of Space Science Data as Commercial Product or Commercial Service Under Acquisition Laws.—Acquisitions of space science data by the Administrator shall be carried out in accordance with applicable acquisition laws and regulations (including applicable provisions of chapters 201 through 285, 341 through 343, and 363 of title 10). For purposes of such law and regulations, space science data shall be considered to be a commercial product or commercial service. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to preclude the United States from acquiring, through contracts with commercial providers, sufficient rights in data to meet the needs of the scientific and educational community or the needs of other government activities.

(d) Safety Standards.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit the Federal Government from requiring compliance with applicable safety standards.

(e) Limitation.—This section does not authorize the Administration to provide financial assistance for the development of commercial systems for the collection of space science data.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3397; Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §836(g)(10)(A), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1874; Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1702(l)(10), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2161.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 50113 | 42 U.S.C. 14713. | Pub. L. 105–303, title I, §105, Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2852. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 117–81 substituted "including applicable provisions of chapters 201 through 285, 341 through 343, and 363" for "including chapters 137 and 140".

2018—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 115–232 substituted "Commercial Product or Commercial Service" for "Commercial Item" in heading and "commercial product or commercial service" for "commercial item" in text.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Jan. 1, 2020, subject to a savings provision, see section 836(h) of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as an Effective Date of 2018 Amendment; Savings Provision note under section 453b of Title 6, Domestic Security.
§ 77.704-1 Work on high-voltage lines. ( a ) No high-voltage line shall be regarded as deenergized for the purpose of performing work on it, until it has been determined by a qualified person (as provided in § 77.103) that such high-voltage line has been deenergized and grounded. Such qualified person shall by visual observation ( 1 ) determine that the disconnecting devices on the high-voltage circuit are in open position, and
( 2 ) insure that each ungrounded conductor of the high-voltage circuit upon which work is to be done is properly connected to the system grounding medium. In the case of resistance grounded or solid wye-connected systems, the neutral wire is the system grounding medium. In the case of an ungrounded power system, either the steel armor or conduit enclosing the system or a surface grounding field is a system grounding medium;
( b ) No work shall be performed on any high-voltage line which is supported by any pole or structure which also supports other high-voltage lines until: ( 1 ) All lines supported on the pole or structure are deenergized and grounded in accordance with all of the provisions of this § 77.704-1 which apply to the repair of deenergized surface high-voltage lines; or
( 2 ) the provisions of §§ 77.704-2 through 77.704-10 have been complied with, with respect to all energized lines, which are supported on the pole or structure.
( c ) Work may be performed on energized surface high-voltage lines only in accordance with the provisions of §§ 77.704-2 through 77.704-10, inclusive.
Blazzard, Grodd & Hasenauer, P.C.
943 Post Road East
Westport, CT 06880
(203) 226-7866

April 6, 2000

Board of Directors
Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America
1750 Hennepin Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55403


RE:  Opinion and Consent of Counsel
     Allianz Life Variable Account A

Dear Sir or Madam:

You have requested our Opinion of Counsel in connection with the filing with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, of a Post-Effective  Amendment to a Registration  Statement on Form S-6
for the  Individual  Flexible  Premium  Variable Life  Insurance  Policies to be
issued by Allianz  Life  Insurance  Company of North  America  and its  separate
account, Allianz Life Variable Account A.

We are of the following opinions:

1.  Allianz Life Variable  Account A is a unit investment  trust as that term is
    defined in Section 4(2) of the  Investment  Company Act of 1940 (the "Act"),
    and is currently  registered  with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission,
    pursuant to Section 8(a) of the Act.

2.  Upon the acceptance of premium payments made by a Policy Owner pursuant to a
    Policy  issued  in  accordance   with  the   Prospectus   contained  in  the
    Registration  Statement  and upon  compliance  with  applicable  law, such a
    Policy  Owner  will  have  a  legally-issued,   fully-paid,   non-assessable
    contractual interest under such Policy.

You  may  use  this  opinion  letter,  or  copy  hereof,  as an  exhibit  to the
Registration Statement.

We  consent to the  reference  to our Firm under the  caption  "Legal  Opinions"
contained in the Prospectus which forms a part of the Registration Statement.

Sincerely,

BLAZZARD, GRODD & HASENAUER, P.C.

By:/S/LYNN KORMAN STONE
   -----------------------------
      Lynn Korman Stone
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9827 

To impose additional duties on imports of goods into the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 

Mr. GOLDEN of Maine introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To impose additional duties on imports of goods into the 

United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. IMPOSITION OF ADDITIONAL DUTIES ON IM4 PORTS OF GOODS INTO THE UNITED STATES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The President shall— 

6 (1) impose a duty on imports of any good into 

7 the United States in an amount equal to 10 percent 

8 ad valorem of the good for each calendar year begin9 ning on or after the date of the enactment of this 

10 Act; and 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9827 IH

1 (2) for each calendar year beginning after the 

2 calendar year referred to in paragraph (1)— 

3 (A) if the United States has a deficit in 

4 the trade of goods and services generally for the 

5 immediately preceding calendar year, increase 

6 the duty imposed under paragraph (1) on such 

7 good by an additional amount equal to 5 per8 cent ad valorem of the good; or 

9 (B) if the United States has a balance or 

10 surplus in the trade of goods and services gen11 erally for the immediately preceding calendar 

12 year, decrease the duty imposed under para13 graph (1) on such good by an amount equal to 

14 5 percent ad valorem of the good for each cal15 endar year beginning after the calendar year re16 ferred to in paragraph (1), except that the duty 

17 imposed under paragraph (1) on such good 

18 shall not be reduced below $0. 

19 (b) DUTIES TO BE CONSIDERED ADDITIONAL DU20 TIES.—The duty required by subsection (a) with respect 

21 to a good is in addition to any other duty imposed by law 

22 with respect to the good. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 22, 2020 / Notices 83603 

[FR Doc. 2020–28136 Filed 12–21–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–9M–C 

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 

URBAN DEVELOPMENT 

[Docket No. FR–7024–C–55] 

30-Day Notice of Proposed Information 

Collection: Quality Control 

Requirements for Direct Endorsement 

Lenders; OMB Control No.: 2502–0600: 

Correction 

AGENCY: Office of the Chief Information 

Officer, HUD. 

ACTION: Notice; correction. 

SUMMARY: On December 17, 2020, HUD 

published a 30-day information 

collection notice for OMB Control No. 

2502–0600. This notice is to correct the 

Average Hours per Response. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

invited to submit comments regarding 

this proposal. Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ 

Start Printed Page 15501PRAMain. Find 

this particular information collection by 

selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day 

Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or 

by using the search function. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Colette Pollard, Reports Management 

Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing 

and Urban Development, 451 7th Street 

SW, Washington, DC 20410; email 

Colette Pollard at Colette.Pollard@

hud.gov or telephone 202–402–3400. 

Persons with hearing or speech 

impairments may access this number 

through TTY by calling the toll-free 

Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–8339. 

This is not a toll-free number. Copies 

of available documents submitted to 

OMB may be obtained from Ms. Pollard. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Correction 

In the Federal Register of December 

17, 2020, in FR Doc. 2020–27771, on 

page 81947, in the third column, correct 

the Average Hours per Response from 

25. to 0.25. 

Colette Pollard, 

Department reports Management Officer, 

Office of the Chief Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2020–28197 Filed 12–21–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210–67–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Fish and Wildlife Service 

[FWS–R8–ES–2020–N152; 

FXES11140800000–20212FF08ECAR00] 

Endangered and Threatened Species; 

Receipt of an Incidental Take Permit 

Application for the California Condor; 

Availability of Draft Conservation Plan 

and Draft Environmental Assessment; 

Manzana Wind Power Project, Kern 

County, California 

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of availability; request 

for public comments. 

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service (Service), have received 

an application from Manzana Wind LLC 

for an incidental take permit under the 

Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 

amended. The permit would authorize 

take of the federally endangered 

California condor (Gymnogyps 

californianus) incidental to otherwise 

lawful activities associated with 

operation of the existing Manzana Wind 

Power Project. We invite comments on 

the draft conservation plan and the draft 

environmental assessment, which we 

have prepared pursuant to the National 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICESEN22DE20.007</GPH>