alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15** 
**- 1130** 

RUNGRUDEE SUTEERACHANON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
MCDONALD’S RESTAURANTS OF MARYLAND, INC. ,
Defendant

- Appellee ,
and

MCDONALD’S CORPORATION ,
Defendant

.

**No. 15** 
**- 1131** 

RUNGRUDEE SUTEERACHANON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
MCDONALD’S RESTAURANTS OF MARYLAND, INC. ,
Defendant

- Appellee.

**No. 15** 
**- 1132** 

RUNGRUDEE SUTEERACHANON ,2 Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

MCDONALD’S RESTAURANTS OF MARYLAND, INC. ,
Defendant

- Appellee.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Roger W. Titus , Senior District Judge. ( 8:13

- cv
- 02889

- RWT; 8:13

- cv
- 03150

- RWT; 8:13

- cv
- 02890

- RWT )

Subm itted : June 25, 2015 Decided: June 29, 2015

Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Rungrudee Suteerachanon, Appellant Pro Se. Nigel F. Telman, Amanda C. Wiley, PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, Chicago, Illinois; Alex Chad Weinstein, PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Rungrudee Suteerachanon appeals the district court ’ s order s dismissing her employment discrimination actions and denying her
motion to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Suteerach anon v.

McDonald’s Rest. of Md. , Inc. , Nos. 8:13

- cv
- 02889

- RWT; 8:13

- cv
03150

- RWT; 8:13

- cv
- 02890

- RWT (D. Md. Nov. 24, 2014 & Jan. 9, 2015)

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials bef ore th is
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06

- 11

- 00 138

- CV

______________________________

DERRON MACKLIN , Appellant

V.

SAIA MOTOR FREIGHT LINES, INC. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 276th Judicial District Court

Marion County, Texas

Trial Court No. 09

- 00015

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Derron Macklin, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order denying

Macklin’s motion to set aside judgment. This portion of the suit had been severed from other

proceedings involving Macklin. Later, he filed a motion to set aside the judgment, and if the

appellate timetable is calculated from the date on which that motion was denied, the notice of

appeal would be timely.

However, the trial court’s order is not a final, appealable judgment. We have jurisdiction

to hear an appeal from a final judgment or from interlocutory orders as expressly authorized by

statute. See T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE A NN

. § § 51.012, 51.014 (West Supp. 2011) . An

order denying a motion for reconsideration or motion for new trial is not a judgment, and is not

independently appealable. See T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE A NN

. 51.014; State Office of Risk

Mgmt. v. Berdan , 335 S.W.3d 421, 428 (Tex. App.

— Corpus Chris ti 2011, pet. filed ).

In accordance with T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3, we provided notice to Macklin, requesting that he

show this Court how we had jurisdiction over this appeal. We have received Macklin’s response,

and considered it. We do not find it to be persuasive.

We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.3 Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: March 1, 2012

Date Decided: March 2, 2012
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 5, 2015

NO. 03-14-00208-CV

Canyon Lake Island Property Owners Association, Cynthia M. Griffin, Richard A. Conley,

and Bill Lester, Appellants

v.

Sterling/Suggs Limited Partnership, Neal E. Suggs, and Nadine R. Suggs, Appellees

APPEAL FROM 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND GOODWIN

REVERSED AND REMANDED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the class-certification order signed by the district court on March 21, 

2014. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was 

reversible error in the district court’s class-certification order. Therefore, the Court reverses the 

district court’s class-certification order, decertifies the class, and remands this matter to the 

district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. The appellees shall pay all 

costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
#### § 57.7051 Loose objects on the mast or drill platform.

To prevent injury to personnel, tools and other objects shall not be left loose on the mast or drill platform.
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.827 Guarding of trailing cables. ( a ) *Guarding.* ( 1 ) The high-voltage cable must be guarded in the following locations: ( i ) From the power center cable coupler for a distance of 10 feet inby the power center;
( ii ) From the entrance gland for a distance of 10 feet outby the last strain clamp on the continuous mining machine; and,
( iii ) At any location where the cable could be damaged by moving equipment.
( 2 ) Guarding must be constructed using nonconductive flame-resistant material or grounded metal.
( b ) *Suspended cables and cable crossovers.* When equipment must cross any portion of the cable, the cable must be either: ( 1 ) Suspended from the mine roof; or
( 2 ) Protected by a cable crossover having the following specifications: ( i ) A minimum length of 33 inches;
( ii ) A minimum width of 17 inches;
( iii ) A minimum height of 3 inches;
( iv ) A minimum cable placement area of two and one half-inches (21 ⁄ 2′′) high by four and one-quarter inches (41 ⁄ 4′′) wide;
( v ) Made of nonconductive material;
( vi ) Made of material with a distinctive color. The color black must not be used; and
( vii ) Made of material that has a minimum compressive strength of 6,400 pounds per square inch (psi).
[75 FR 17549, Apr. 6, 2010]
### §435c. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 435c, comprising section 3002 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, Pub. L. 108–458, was editorially reclassified as section 3343 of this title.
Exhibit 32.4


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Altria Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Howard A. Willard III, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ HOWARD A. WILLARD III


Howard A. Willard III


Executive Vice President and


Chief Financial Officer


August 4, 2014








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Altria Group, Inc. and will be retained by Altria Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 585.230 May I request a lease if there is no Call? You may submit an unsolicited request for a commercial lease or a limited lease under this part. Your unsolicited request must contain the following information: ( a ) The area you are requesting for lease.
( b ) A general description of your objectives and the facilities that you would use to achieve those objectives.
( c ) A general schedule of proposed activities including those leading to commercial operations.
( d ) Available and pertinent data and information concerning renewable energy and environmental conditions in the area of interest, including energy and resource data and information used to evaluate the area of interest. BOEM will withhold trade secrets and commercial or financial information that is privileged or confidential from public disclosure under exemption 4 of the FOIA and as provided in § 585.114.
( e ) If available from the appropriate State or local government authority, a statement that the proposed activity conforms with State and local energy planning requirements, initiatives, or guidance.
( f ) Documentation showing that you meet the qualifications to become a lessee, as specified in §§ 585.107 and 585.108.
( g ) An acquisition fee, as specified in § 585.502(a).
#### § 725.10 Information collection.

The information collection requirements contained in 30 CFR 725.15, 725.23(a) and 725.24 have fewer than 10 respondents per year, they are exempt from the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*) and do not require clearance by OMB.

[47 FR 38490, Aug. 31, 1982]
### §442. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 442, comprising section 1101 of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as section 3231 of this title.
### §403–1a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 403–1a, comprising section 1019 of the National Security Intelligence Reform Act of 2004, Pub. L. 108–458, title I, and also of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, Pub. L. 108–458, was editorially reclassified as section 3364 of this title.
#### § 58.620 Drill dust control.

Holes shall be collared and drilled wet, or other effective dust control measures shall be used, when drilling non-water-soluble material. Effective dust control measures shall be used when drilling water-soluble materials.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MEGAN H. CAMPBELL,

Appellant,

v.

RYAN T. CAMPBELL,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-2369

[April 18, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Fabienne E. Fahnestock, Judge; L.T. Case No. 17-

002238 FMCE (35).

Nicole Nicolette Mace, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Terrence P. O'Connor of Morgan, Carratt & O'Connor, P.A., Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 581.6 Appeals.

Any party adversely affected by a decision of a BOEM official made pursuant to the provisions of this part shall have the right of appeal pursuant to 30 CFR part 590, except as provided otherwise in § 581.21 of this part.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

AMENDMENTS TO RULE 1905 OF THE

PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF JUDICIAL

ADMINISTRATION :

:

:

:

: NO. 593

JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1 st day of May

, 20 2 3

, it is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section

10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania that Rule 1905 of the Pennsylvania Rules of

Judicial Administration is amended in the form attached

.

To the extent that notice of proposed rulemaking would otherwise be required by

Pa.R.J.A. 103, the immediate promulgation of the amend ment s is found to be in the

interest of efficient administration.

This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. 103(b), and shall be

effective immediately

.

Additions are bolded and are underlined.

Deletions are bolded and are bracketed.
### §70709. Security clearances for Commission members and staff

The appropriate Federal agencies or departments shall cooperate with a Commission in expeditiously providing to the Commission members and staff appropriate security clearances to the extent possible pursuant to existing procedures and requirements. No person shall be provided with access to classified information under this chapter without the appropriate security clearances.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3435.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 70709 | 42 U.S.C. 16849. | Pub. L. 109–155, title VIII, §829, Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2944. |

Section
April 4, 2012

Civic Helicopters is requesting an extension of our Drug Testing Program exemption required under Sec. 91.147 in that Civic H elicopters already ha s an approved drug testing program under FAR Part 135. Civic Helicopters, Inc. operate under the certificate DCQA715B, located at 2206 Palomar Airport Road, Carlsbad, CA 92011. The complete contact information is at the foot of this l etter. Civic Helicopter s, Inc. request s an extension of our exemption from Sec. 91.147 of the required drug test program. Civic Helicopter is requesting an extension of complete relief of this 91.147 drug test requirement. Civic Helicopters already has a FAA approved drug test program in place under Part 135 operation. The pilot is the same pilot who will be performing the service unde r both Part 135 and Sec. 91.147 programs. Civic Helicopters Inc. is a California registered company holding out to the public as the FAA certified nonscheduled public air carrier which wi ll be benefited b y not duplicating the same program twice for the same purpose under the cost reduction act established in the compan y preferred business operation practices. The granting o f extending the drug testing exemption under Sec. 91.147 will not affect the safet y requirement established by FAA since the same required drug testing program has alread y been implemented b y Civic Helicopters under FAR Part 135 program
. In summary , Civic Helicopters received FAA Part 135 certification in 1987 and has been operating successfully with the required drug testing program in place without a single positive test. Therefore, Civic Helicopters is requesting an extension of the exemption under Sec. 91.147 of the drug testing requirement since the same pilot will be operating under both programs; a single testing program would in fact satisfy both programs. Respectfully ,
Chin Yi Tu President Civic Helicopters, Inc.

2206 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD, SUITE H, CARLSBA D, CA 92011

TEL 760

- 438

- 8424 FAX 760

- 438

- 0451 WWW.CIVICHELICOPTERS .COM
Very truly yours,

Michael J. Elméiidorf 11 President and CEO Associated General Contractors of New York State

A Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America



# ^^·^z^^^vG^^I^LB'^

Associated General Contractors of New York State, LLC 10 Airline Drive, Suite 203 Albany, New York 12205-1025 518-456-1134 P 518-456-1198 F

www.agcnys.org

The Honorable Ray LaHood Secretary Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

The Honorable Lisa Jackson Administrator Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20004
Dear Secretary LaHood and Adminstrator .Jackson:
The Associated General Contractors of New York State, LLC (AGC NYS), New York's largest statewide contractor association providing advocacy and education for contractors and aiThiated firms, is opposed to the aggressive and unprecedented Federal CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) standards set for the years 2017-2025. The proposed regulations will have a decidedly negative effect on many of our nation's businesses and specifically the construction industry.
Our members help support and grow the New York's economy by constructing its $30 billion annual building, transportation. civil and environmental infrastructure. The need for the power that exists in today's light trucks, vans and utility vehicles cannot be supplied with the miles-per-gallon this proposal would require without significantly higher costs--and with it a significantly higher cost of doing business on an industry already struggling with a treacherous economy and historic levels of unemployment. This proposal would pile on new costs that the construction industry simply cannot bear.
AGC NYS urges the NHTSA and EPA to reconsider this job-killing proposal and to instead pursue policies that more effectively balance environmental concerns with the need for economic recovery and job creation.
#### § 585.411 How does an assignment affect the assignor's liability?

As assignor, you are liable for all obligations, monetary and nonmonetary, that accrued under your lease or grant before BOEM approves your assignment. Our approval of the assignment does not relieve you of these accrued obligations. BOEM may require you to bring the lease or grant into compliance to the extent the obligation accrued before the effective date of your assignment if your assignee or subsequent assignees fail to perform any obligation under the lease or grant.
#### § 7.72 New technology.

MSHA may approve a blasting unit that incorporates technology for which the requirements of this subpart are not applicable if the Agency determines that the blasting unit is as safe as those which meet the requirements of this subpart.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Discovery Oil, Ltd, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, M. Jeanett Ippolito, Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ M. Jeanett Ippolito

By  ____________________________________

M. Jeanett Ippolito

Secretary

Date:  November 19, 2010





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Discovery Oil, Ltd. and will be retained by the Company to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.8

                                  BSI2000, Inc.
                 AGREEMENT TO REPLACE OPTIONS WITH COMMON STOCK

      This Agreement entered into as of September 11, 2001 is between BSI2000,
Inc. (the "Company") and Jack Harper and Bryan Luman (together the "Employees").

      Where as the Employees have been granted options to purchase common stock
under the Company's Employee Stock Option Plan, and

      Where as the options are exercisable at $.625 per share, and

      Where as the current value of the shares has been determined to be $.001
per share, and

      Where as the Company wishes to reward the Employees for faithful service
under trying conditions and wishes to retain the services of the Employees, now
then the Company and the Employees

      Agree as follows:

      1.    The company shall issue 2,500,000 shares of common stock to Jack
            Harper and 212,045 shares of common stock to Bryan Luman. The shares
            shall be valued at $.001 per share and shall be fully earned and
            non-forfeitable when issued.

      2.    All options previously issued to the Employees shall be surrendered
            by the Employees and cancelled by the Company.

      3.    The common stock issued to the Employees shall be subject to such
            transfer and resale restrictions as may be imposed by the Company's
            Board of Directors for a term not to exceed ____ years.

      4.    The Board may require that the shares bear a restrictive legend
            referencing this agreement and/or that the shares be escrowed.

      5.    The restrictions on transfer and resale shall also apply to any
            shares received by the Employees as a result of any recapitalization
            or sale of the Company or any merger of the Company with another
            company.

                                   SIGNATURES

     BSI2000, Inc.                                   Employees:

     /s/ Jack Harper                                 /s/ Jack Harper
     --------------------------                      ---------------------------
       Jack Harper, President                        Jack Harper


                                                     /s/ Bryan Luman
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Bryan Luman
§ 57.4363 Underground evacuation instruction. ( a ) At least once every twelve months, all persons who work underground shall be instructed in the escape and evacuation plans and procedures and fire warning signals in effect at the mine.
( b ) Whenever a change is made in escape and evacuation plans and procedures for any area of the mine, all persons affected shall be instructed in the new plans or procedures.
( c ) Whenever persons are assigned to work in areas other than their regularly assigned areas, they shall be instructed about the escapeway for that area at the time of such assignment. However, persons who normally work in more than one area of the mine shall be instructed at least once every twelve months about the location of escapeways for all areas of the mine in which they normally work or travel.
( d ) At the completion of any instruction given under this standard, the mine operator shall certify the date that the instruction was given. Certifications shall be retained for at least one year.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2




Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants




Sedona Corporation
Limerick,  Pennsylvania



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into Registration Statements
of Form S-3 (Nos. 333-71457, 333-31983, 33-47127, 333-03719, 333-52973) and
related prospectuses and the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-53051)
of our report dated March 13, 1998, except for Note 14 which is dated March 27,
1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1997, and
the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows and
schedule for the year then ended, of Sedona Corporation (formerly Scan-Graphics,
Inc.) included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1999.

We also consent to the reference to us under the caption "Experts" in the
Prospectuses.


                                                                BDO Seidman, LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 30, 2000