alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 795.4 Information collection.

The collections of information contained in part 795 have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* and assigned clearance number 1029-0061. The information will be used to determine if the applicants meet the requirements of the Small Operator Assistance Program. Response is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with Public Law 95-87. Public reporting burden for this information is estimated to average 24.2 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Information Collection Clearance Officer (MS-202), 1951 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20240.

[59 FR 28167, May 31, 1994, as amended at 75 FR 60275, Sept. 29, 2010]
#### § 57.9362 Protection of signalmen.

Signalmen used during slushing operations underground shall be located away from possible contact with cables, sheaves, and slusher buckets.
### §20104. Registration and voting aids

#### (a) Printed instructions; telecommunications devices for the deaf

Each State shall make available registration and voting aids for Federal elections for handicapped and elderly individuals, including—

(1) instructions, printed in large type, conspicuously displayed at each permanent registration facility and each polling place; and

(2) information by telecommunications devices for the deaf.

#### (b) Medical certification

No notarization or medical certification shall be required of a handicapped voter with respect to an absentee ballot or an application for such ballot, except that medical certification may be required when the certification establishes eligibility, under State law—

(1) to automatically receive an application or a ballot on a continuing basis; or

(2) to apply for an absentee ballot after the deadline has passed.

#### (c) Notice of availability of aids

The chief election officer of each State shall provide public notice, calculated to reach elderly and handicapped voters, of the availability of aids under this section, assistance under section 10508 of this title, and the procedures for voting by absentee ballot, not later than general public notice of registration and voting is provided.

(Pub. L. 98–435, §5, Sept. 28, 1984, 98 Stat. 1679.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1973ee–3 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable with respect to elections taking place after Dec. 31, 1985, see section 9 of Pub. L. 98–435, set out as a note under section 20101 of this title.
#### Dukes of Dixieland, Respondent, v. Audio Fidelity, Inc., Defendant-Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff. Joseph P. Delaney, Third-Party Defendant.

Order, entered Jidy 12, 1962, denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s fourth cause of action, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted, with $10 costs, but with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint pleading a cause of action upon a *quantum meruit*basis in place of said fourth cause of action. The allegations of the fourth cause of action, as amplified by plaintiff’s bill of particulars, indicate that plaintiff sues upon an alleged oral agreement, under which by the very terms set forth in the complaint and bill of particulars defendant’s liability would continue for an indefinite time beyond a period of one year from the making of the contract. Plaintiff, which is the trade name employed by three musicians, seeks to recover, under the fourth cause of action, its agreed share of statutory mechanized royalties and public performance and ether payments received by the defendant recording company and its publishing affiliate or designee on musical arrangements created by plaintiff. It is clear, ¡however, that the oral agreement contemplated the reproduction, publication and public performance of plaintiff’s musical arrangements and payments of royalties and related income for an unlimited period of time, beyond the period of one year. Therefore, by its terms the oral agreement is impossible of performance within a year and falls within the prohibition of the Statute of Frauds *(Cohen*v. *Bartgis Bros. Co.,*264 App. Div. 260, affd. 289 N. T. 846; *Elsf elder*v. *Cournand,*270 App. Div. 162). It is possible, however, that plaintiff is entitled to recover on a *quantum meruit*basis for the reasonable value of services actually rendered by it *(Elsfelder*v. *Command, supra,*p. 165). Order, entered on July 12, 1962, denying defendant’s motion to vacate plaintiff’s notice of examination before trial, unanimously modified, on the facts and the law, without costs, to the extent of striking items 4 and 6, which relate exclusively to plaintiff’s fourth cause of action, inasmuch as that cause has been dismissed. The remaining items will be deemed applicable only to the three surviving causes Of action in the complaint. Settle order on notice fixing date for examination to proceed. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
#### §§ 586.204-586.209 [Reserved]
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9464 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow employers to deduct 

certain transportation fringe benefits. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 6, 2024 

Mr. AUCHINCLOSS (for himself, Mr. MOLINARO, Mr. BLUMENAUER, and Mr. 

MCGOVERN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow 

employers to deduct certain transportation fringe benefits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Supporting Transit 

5 Commutes Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEDUCTION ALLOWED FOR CERTAIN TRANSPOR7 TATION FRINGE BENEFITS PROVIDED BY EM8 PLOYERS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 274(l) of the Internal 

10 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating paraVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:03 Sep 11, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H9464.IH H9464

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9464 IH

1 graph (2) as paragraph (3) and inserting after paragraph 

2 (1) the following new paragraph: 

3 ‘‘(2) EXCEPTION FOR CERTAIN TRANSPOR4 TATION FRINGE BENEFITS.— 

5 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) shall 

6 not apply to so much of any qualified transpor7 tation fringe described in subparagraph (A) or 

8 (B) of section 132(f)(1) as does not exceed the 

9 limitation described in section 132(f)(2)(A). 

10 ‘‘(B) REDUCED DEDUCTION IN CASE OF

11 BENEFITS PROVIDED UNDER SALARY REDUC12 TION AGREEMENTS.—In the case of any quali13 fied transportation fringe with respect to which 

14 the employee may elect between receiving such 

15 fringe and receiving an amount directly in cash, 

16 subparagraph (A) shall be applied by sub17 stituting ‘50 percent of so much’ for ‘so 

18 much’.’’. 

19 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 274(l)(3) 

20 of such Code, as redesignated by subsection (a), is amend21 ed— 

22 (1) by striking ‘‘this subsection’’ and inserting 

23 ‘‘paragraph (1)’’, and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 9464 IH

1 (2) by inserting ‘‘FOR QUALIFIED BICYCLE COM2 MUTING REIMBURSEMENT’’ after ‘‘EXCEPTION’’ in 

3 the heading thereof. 

4 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

5 this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act, in taxable years 

7 ending after such date. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### § 731.12 Submission of State programs.

Each State that wishes to regulate coal exploration and surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-Federal and non-Indian lands within its boundaries shall submit three copies of a proposed program to the Director. A State may submit a proposed program at any time. The State shall retain sufficient copies of the program for public inspection under § 732.11(a).

[47 FR 26364, June 17, 1982]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of The Dewey Electronics
Corporation (the "Corporation") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John H. D. Dewey, Chief Executive
Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS 1350, as
adopted pursuant to SS 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Corporation.

/s/ John H.D. Dewey
John H. D. Dewey, Chief Executive Officer
Date:  May 13, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to The Dewey Electronics Corporation and will be retained
by The Dewey Electronics Corporation and furnished to the Securities
and exchange commission or its staff upon request.





EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of The Dewey Electronics
Corporation (the "Corporation") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen P. Krill, Treasurer of the
Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS 1350, as adopted pursuant
to SS 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Corporation.

/s/ Stephen P. Krill
Stephen P. Krill, Treasurer
Date:  May 13, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to The Dewey Electronics Corporation and will be retained
by The Dewey Electronics Corporation and furnished to the Securities
and exchange commission or its staff upon request.
§ 7.28 Test for flame resistance of rigid ventilation tubing. ( a ) *Test procedures.* ( 1 ) Prepare 6 samples of ventilation tubing 48 inches in length with all flared or thickened ends removed. Any sample with a cross-sectional dimension greater than 24 inches must be tested in a 24-inch size.
( 2 ) For each test, suspend the sample in the center of the gallery by running a wire through the 48-inch length of tubing.
( 3 ) Use a front exhaust system to remove smoke escaping from the gallery. The exhaust system must remain on during all testing but not affect the air flow in the gallery.
( 4 ) Set the methane-fueled impinged jet burner to yield a flame height of 12 inches as measured at the outermost tip of the flame.
( 5 ) Apply the burner to the front lower edge of the tubing so that two-thirds of the burner is under the tubing and the remaining third is exposed to allow the flames to curl onto the inside of the tubing. Keep the burner in contact with the material for 60 seconds. If melting material might clog the burner orifices, rotate the burner slightly during application of the flame.
( 6 ) Test 3 samples in still air and 3 samples with an average of 125 ft./min. of air flowing past the sample.
( 7 ) Record the propagation length and duration of burning for each of the 6 samples. The duration of burn is the total burning time of the specimen during the flame test. This includes the burning time of any material that falls on the floor of the test gallery during the igniting period. However, the suspended specimen is considered burning only after the burner is removed. Should the burning time of a suspended specimen and a specimen on the floor coincide, count the coinciding burn time only once.
( 8 ) Calculate the average duration of burning for the first 3 samples (still air) and the second 3 samples (125 ft./min. air flow).
( b ) *Acceptable performance.* The ventilation tubing shall meet each of the following criteria: ( 1 ) Flame propagation of less than 4 feet in each of the 6 tests.
( 2 ) An average duration of burning of less than 1 minute in both groups of 3 tests.
( 3 ) A duration of burning not exceeding 2 minutes in each of the 6 tests.
[53 FR 23500, June 22, 1988, as amended at 60 FR 33723, June 29, 1995]
#### § 77.201 Methane content in surface installations.

The methane content in the air of any structure, enclosure or other facility shall be less than 1.0 volume per centum.
p.1 

OAR Box 1706 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

40) IV-E-1 

Docket Number: 

A-98-13 

Printed 10/8/2008 10:25:09 AM Sheet 40 of 142 
A-WTS P.2 

MEMORANDUM 

TO: Project File - Organic Liquids Distribution NESHAP 

ESD Project 96/05 

FROM: Martha Smith 

Waste and Chemical Processes Group 

Emission Standards Division 

DATE: April 25, 2002 

SUBJECT: Exparte Meeting with the American Chemistry Council 

This memorandum is intended to document a meeting held between the American 

Chemistry Council (ACC) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The participants 

were Mario Gamboa ofthe American Chemistry Council, Tara Lanier of Ashland Chemical, and 

Martha Smith ofthe EPA. The meeting took place on April 17, 2002 at EPA in RTP, NC, it 

lasted one hour. 

Things that there discussed and the ACC mentioned they would be commenting on were: 

1) In the HON, we (EPA) allow 10 years before tanks have to be retrofitted to comply. EPA 

acknowledged that it can take that long before a tank has been emptied, cleaned, and is available 

for the retrofit. 2) They will be asking for vapor balancing in the rule. I mentioned that we did 

not see vapor balancing in the response to the ICR, they acknowledged that was certainly 

possible. I also mentioned that I was not certain that the for-hire terminals were capable of 

performing vapor balancing with reliable safety precautions. They agreed, but pointed out that 

they (ACC) were capable of performing with proper safety precautions. 3) How is non-gasoline 

defined? Is diesel a non-gasoline? Are the gasoline additives specifically excluded or included? 

4)Something else that they will comment on is why didn't we use the standard standards more, 

LDAR was used but not WW. 5)They would like QA/QC standard standards (that's not our area) 

5)Marine vessels thruput - I'm going to have to wait for the written comment on that one, I didn't 

understand their concern. 

tS§f!«20! ,*(»! 

EPA AIR DOCKET
§ 28.25 Changes or modifications of approved fuses; issuance of modification of certificate of approval. ( a ) Each applicant may, if he desires to change any feature of an approved fuse, request a modification of the original certificate of approval issued by MSHA for such fuse by filing an application for modification in accordance with the provisions of this section.
( b ) Applications, including fees, shall be submitted as specified in § 28.10 for an original certificate of approval, with a request for a modification of the existing certificate to cover any proposed change.
( c ) The application for modification, together with the examination, inspection, and test results prescribed by § 28.10 shall be examined and evaluated by MSHA to determine if the proposed modification meets the requirements of this part.
( d ) If the proposed modification meets the requirements of this part, a formal modification of approval will be issued, accompanied, where necessary, by reproductions of revised approval labels or markings.
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.176 Does a suspension affect my royalty payment?

A directed suspension may affect the payment of rental or royalties for the lease as provided in 30 CFR 1218.154.
#### § 57.22501 Personal electric lamps (I-A, I-B, I-C, II-A, II-B, III, IV, V-A, and V-B mines).

Electric lamps used for personal illumination shall be approved by MSHA under the requirements of 30 CFR parts 19 or 20, as applicable.
§ 77.1608 Dumping facilities. ( a ) Dumping locations and haulage roads shall be kept reasonably free of water, debris, and spillage.
( b ) Where the ground at a dumping place may fail to support the weight of a loaded dump truck, trucks shall be dumped a safe distance back from the edge of the bank.
( c ) Adequate protection shall be provided at dumping locations where persons may be endangered by falling material.
( d ) Grizzlies, grates, and other sizing devices at dump and transfer points shall be anchored securely in place.
( e ) If truck spotters are used, they shall be well in the clear while trucks are backing into dumping position and dumping; lights shall be used at night to direct trucks.
### §4325. "Unallocated interest fund" defined

As used in this chapter, the term "unallocated interest fund" means the sum of (1) the earnings and profits accumulated prior to March 4, 1923, and attributable to investments and reinvestments under section 4312 of this title by the Secretary of the Treasury, plus (2) the earnings and profits accumulated on or after March 4, 1923, in respect of the earnings and profits referred to in clause (1) of this section.

(Oct. 6, 1917, ch. 106, §28, as added Mar. 10, 1928, ch. 167, §15, 45 Stat. 274.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act Oct. 6, 1917, ch. 106, 40 Stat. 411, known as the Trading with the enemy Act, also known as the Trading with the Enemy Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 4301 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 28 of the former Appendix to this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOSEPH ANTHONY HERNANDEZ,

Appellant,

v.

REBECCA L. HEIKKA,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-2218

[November 16, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Carlos A. Rodriguez, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 07-

008440 (14).

Hinda Klein of Conroy Simberg, Hollywood, for appellant.

Kenneth D. Cooper, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
##### 



THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 Three MonthsEnded March 31
    
    
    Twelve Months Ended December 312006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001(Millions of Dollars)Earnings:Pretax earnings
    
    $
    86
    
    
    $
    426
    
    
    $
    214
    
    
    $
    397
    
    
    $
    534
    
    
    $
    320Fixed charges
    
    
    76
    
    
    
    280
    
    
    
    294
    
    
    
    294
    
    
    
    322
    
    
    
    314Net earnings
    
    $
    162
    
    
    $
    706
    
    
    $
    508
    
    
    $
    691
    
    
    
    856
    
    
    $
    634Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    72
    
    
    $
    267
    
    
    $
    280
    
    
    $
    284
    
    
    $
    319
    
    
    $
    306Adjustments
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    13
    
    
    
    14
    
    
    
    10
    
    
    
    3
    
    
    
    8Fixed charges
    
    $
    76
    
    
    $
    280
    
    
    $
    294
    
    
    $
    294
    
    
    $
    322
    
    
    $
    314Ratio of earnings to
fixed charges
    
    
    2.13
    
    
    
    2.52
    
    
    
    1.73
    
    
    
    2.35
    
    
    
    2.66
    
    
    
    2.02
### Part C—Additional Education Provisions
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edwin Pearson, Appellant.

-Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County, rendered October 6, 1959, after a jury trial, convicting him of attempted grand larceny in the first degree, burglary in the third degree, and malicious mischief as a felony, and sentencing him to serve a term of two to five years upon his completion of the prison sentence which he was then serving. Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
### §4851. Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security

#### (a) Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security

The President shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, an Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security, who shall carry out—

(1) all functions of the Secretary under this chapter; and

(2) all functions delegated to the Under Secretary of Commerce for Export Administration on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act.

#### (b) Reference

On and after August 13, 2018, any reference in any law or regulation to the Under Secretary of Commerce for Export Administration shall be deemed to be a reference to the Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security.

#### (c) Omitted

#### (d) Continuation in office

The individual serving as Under Secretary of Commerce for Export Administration on the day before August 13, 2018, may serve as the Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security on and after that date without the need for renomination or reappointment.

(Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title XVII, §1781, Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2238; Pub. L. 116–6, div. H, title II, §205(a), Feb. 15, 2019, 133 Stat. 476.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), was in the original "this subtitle", meaning subtitle B (§§1741–1781) of title XVII of div. A of Pub. L. 115–232, Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2208, known as the Export Control Reform Act of 2018, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of subtitle B to the Code, see section 1741 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a Short Title note under section 4801 of this title and Tables.

The date of the enactment of this Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(2), probably means the date of enactment of Pub. L. 115–232, which enacted this section and was approved Aug. 13, 2018.

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 1781 of Pub. L. 115–232. Subsec. (c) of section 1781 of Pub. L. 115–232 amended section 5314 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Amendments

2019—Pub. L. 116–6, §205(a)(3), added subsec. (a). Former subsec. (a) redesignated (b).

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 116–6, §205(a)(1), (2), redesignated subsec. (a) as (b) and substituted "Reference" for "In general" in heading. Former subsec. (b) redesignated (c).

Subsecs. (c), (d). Pub. L. 116–6, §205(a)(1), redesignated subsecs. (b) and (c) as (c) and (d), respectively.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2019 Amendment

Pub. L. 116–6, div. H, title II, §205(d), Feb. 15, 2019, 133 Stat. 477, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [amending this section and section 5314 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees] shall take effect as if included in the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232)."