alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Audit of the Federal Reserve

              																	United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking, Currency and Housing. Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy, 1975-1977					 and 	Ninety-Fourth Congress, 1975-1977. 						*Audit of the Federal Reserve : Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy of the Committee on Banking, Currency, and Housing, House of Representatives, Ninety-Fourth Congress, First Session, on H.R. 4316, March 18; April 22, 23, 25, 29; and May 8, 1975*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										March 18; April 22, 23, 25, 29; and May 8, 1975,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1020,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 99(c)



    Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Detrex Corporation, a Michigan corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission ( the "Report") that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.


May 15, 2003                            /s/ Thomas E. Mark
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Thomas E. Mark
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer


May 15, 2003                            /s/ Steven J. Quinlan
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Steven J. Quinlan
                                        Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial
                                        Officer & Treasurer
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-10565

Summary Calendar

 

I S NDATAH,

Plaintiff-Appellant

versus

JACK COX, SR; TENNELL ATKINS; RODNEY DEBAUN; GARY WITHERSPOON;

CATHERINE WITHERSPOON; GEORGE DAY; JESSE E THOMPSON; WINSTON SCOTT

MCINTOSH; ROBERT GILGORE; CHRIS KNABEL; ASIF BUTT; COLIN DEVALLY;

RODERICK BEMMINGS; GLENN FENECH; JERRY COLLIVER; MOHAMMED EL HUJJ

ABRAHAM; H C PASRAM; FILDMENO CARDOSO; DJONDO MESSAN KOFFL; BOBBIE

COON; CHERYL PHILLIPS; SHARON DUNCAN also known as Lee Lewalling;

DANA ALHAWAJ, also known as Dana Jones; BROADMOOR APARTMENTS;

OAKPARK APARTMENTS; AIRCRAFT INSURANCE; DALLAS JET CENTER INC;

ARLINGTON JET CENTER INC

Defendants-Appellees

 

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:98-CV-309-X

 

June 9, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ndatah appeals the district court's dismissal of his civil

rights and RICO claims. The district court dismissed Ndatah's RICO

and constitutional claims as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. §
2

1915(e)(2)(B)(i). We review a dismissal under that provision for

abuse of discretion. See Siglar v. Hightower, 112 F.3d 191, 193

(5th Cir. 1997). After a careful review of the record, we are

persuaded that the district court did not abuse its discretion in

dismissing Ndatah's civil rights and RICO claims.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Techdyne, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Barry
J. Pardon, President (principal executive officer) of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

                                                   /s/ Barry J. Pardon
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Barry J. Pardon, President
                                                   (principal executive officer)
                                                   of Techdyne, Inc.
                                                   March 31, 2003
#### § 7.501 Purpose and scope.

This subpart L establishes requirements for MSHA approval of refuge alternatives and components for use in underground coal mines. Refuge alternatives are intended to provide a life-sustaining environment for persons trapped underground when escape is impossible.
#### § 77.1708 Safety program; instruction of persons employed at the mine.

On or before September 30, 1971, each operator of a surface coal mine shall establish and maintain a program of instruction with respect to the safety regulations and procedures to be followed at the mine and shall publish and distribute to each employee, and post in conspicuous places throughout the mine, all such safety regulations and procedures established in accordance with the provisions of this section.

[36 FR 9364, May 22, 1971, as amended at 36 FR 13143, July 15, 1971]
§ 553.28 What financial test procedures must I use to evaluate the amount of self-insurance allowed as OSFR evidence based on unencumbered assets? ( a ) Divide the total amount of the stockholders'/owners' equity listed on the balance sheet by 4.
( b ) Divide the value of the unencumbered U.S. assets by 2.
( c ) The smaller number calculated under paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section is the maximum allowable amount you may use to demonstrate OSFR under this method.
### Transport and dispersion of fluorescent tracer particles for the dune-bed condition, Atrisco Feeder Canal near Bernalillo, New Mexico

By: R. E. RathbunVance C. Kennedy

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1037

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Transport and dispersion of fluorescent tracer particles for the dune-bed condition, Atrisco Feeder Canal near Bernalillo, New Mexico(1976)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### §404o–1. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 404o–1, comprising section 119A of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as section 3057 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Jacob Wissenfeld v. Walter H. Wilkins, as Warden of Attica Prison.

Application granted and order dismissing appeal from order of Wyoming County Court entered April 21, 1961, vacated.
#### § 77.502-2 Electric equipment; frequency of examination and testing.

The examinations and tests required under the provision of this § 77.502 shall be conducted at least monthly.
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.1714-6 Emergency tethers.

At least one tether, which is a durable rope or equivalent material designed to permit members of a mine crew to link together while evacuating the mine during an emergency, shall be provided and stored with the additional SCSRs on the fixed work location and on the mobile equipment required in §§ 75.1714-4(a)(1) and (b) of this part.

[71 FR 71454, Dec. 8, 2006]
§ 795.9 Program services and data requirements. ( a ) To the extent possible with available funds, the program administrator shall select and pay a qualified laboratory to make the determination and statement and provide other services referenced in paragraph (b) of this section for eligible operators who request assistance.
( b ) The program administrator shall determine the data needed for each applicant or group of applicants. Data collected and the results provided to the program administrator shall be sufficient to satisfy the requirements for: ( 1 ) The determination of the probable hydrologic consequences of the surface mining and reclamation operation in the proposed permit area and adjacent areas, including the engineering analyses and designs necessary for the determination in accordance with §§ 780.21(f), 784.14(e), and any other applicable provisions of this chapter;
( 2 ) The drilling and statement of the results of test borings or core samplings for the proposed permit area in accordance with §§ 780.22(b) and 784.22(b) and any other applicable provisions of this chapter;
( 3 ) The development of cross-section maps and plans required by §§ 779.25 and 783.25;
( 4 ) The collection of archaeological and historic information and related plans required by §§ 779.12(b) and 783.12(b) and §§ 780.31 and 784.17 and any other archaeological and historic information required by the regulatory authority;
( 5 ) Pre-blast surveys required by § 780.13; and
( 6 ) The collection of site-specific resources information, the production of protection and enhancement plans for fish and wildlife habitats required by §§ 780.16 and 784.21, and information and plans for any other environmental values required by the regulatory authority under the act.
( c ) Data collection and analysis may proceed concurrently with the development of mining and reclamation plans by the operator.
( d ) Data collected under this program shall be made publicly available in accordance with § 773.6(d) of this chapter. The program administrator shall develop procedures for interstate coordination and exchange of data.
[48 FR 2272, Jan. 18, 1983, as amended at 48 FR 44780, Sept. 30, 1983; 59 FR 28168, May 31, 1994, as amended at 65 FR 79670, Dec. 19, 2000]
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

SUPREME COURT

October 12, 2010

CORONA CONSTRUCTION INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 141596

CoA: 295576

v Wayne CC: 08-109892-CK

CHERYL GRAY, GREGORY GRAY AND 

GRAY & GRAY PRODUCTIONS, INC.

Defendants-Appellants.

__________________________________

STATEMENT OF JUSTICE CORRIGAN DENYING MOTION FOR 

DISQUALIFICATION

CORRIGAN, J., denies defendants’ motion to disqualify her from hearing this case 

and states as follows:

Defendants seek my disqualification because I once served as a law clerk for the 

trial judge’s father. That fact is not a basis on which my impartiality might reasonably be 

questioned. Accordingly, defendants have not identified a ground for my recusal.
§ 77.410 Mobile equipment; automatic warning devices. ( a ) Mobile equipment such as front-end loaders, forklifts, tractors, graders, and trucks, except pickup trucks with an unobstructed rear view, shall be equipped with a warning device that— ( 1 ) Gives an audible alarm when the equipment is put in reverse; or
( 2 ) Uses infrared light, ultrasonic waves, radar, or other effective devices to detect objects or persons at the rear of the equipment, and sounds an audible alarm when a person or object is detected. This type of discriminating warning device shall— ( i ) Have a sensing area of a sufficient size that would allow endangered persons adequate time to get out of the danger zone.
( ii ) Give audible and visual alarms inside the operator's compartment and an audible alarm outside of the operator's compartment when a person or object is detected in the sensing area; and
( iii ) When the equipment is put in reverse, activate and give a one-time audible and visual alarm inside the operator's compartment and a one-time audible alarm outside the operator's compartment.
( b ) Alarms shall be audible above the surrounding noise levels.
( c ) Warning devices shall be maintained in functional condition.
( d ) An automatic reverse-activated strobe light may be substituted for an audible alarm when mobile equipment is operated at night.
[54 FR 30517, July 20, 1989]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 6-K



REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



For the Month of April 2005

GENESYS S.A.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



L'Acropole, 954-980 avenue Jean Mermoz, 34000 Montpellier, FRANCE

(Address of principal executive offices)



> Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

Form 20-FXForm 40-F

> Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper aspermitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):____

> Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper aspermitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):____

> Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the 
>     information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

YesNoX

> If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-_______________.









---







---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---









SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: April 6, 2005

| | GENESYS SA
        By: /s/ François Legros
        Name: François Legros 
        Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Jared Mackensie Monroe, * From the 42nd District Court

of Taylor County

Trial Court No. 25931A

.

Vs. No. 11

- 16

- 00 264

- CR * August 31, 2018

The Sta te of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Simmons, F. J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, J.;

Simmons, F.J., sitting by assignment;

and Wright, S.C.J., sitting

by assignment )

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
# C_2023342EN.01000201.xml

| 28.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 342/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 342/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11242 – EP CORPORATE GROUP / LEB / LEK)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 342/02)

On 22 September 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11242. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11242. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.700-1 Approved methods of grounding. Metallic sheaths, armors and conduits in resistance grounded systems where the enclosed conductors are a part of the system will be approved if a solid connection is made to the neutral conductor; in all other systems, the following methods of grounding will be approved: ( a ) A solid connection to a borehole casing having low resistance to earth;
( b ) A solid connection to metal waterlines having low resistance to earth;
( c ) A solid connection to a grounding conductor, other than the neutral conductor of a resistance grounded system, extending to a low resistance ground field located on the surface;
( d ) Any other method of grounding, approved by an authorized representative of the Secretary, which ensures that there is no difference in potential between such metallic enclosures and the earth.
OPINION OF COUNSEL




TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

I am counsel to Berwyn Income Fund, Inc.  I am
writing this letter to state my opinion as counsel
that the shares of the Fund sold in calendar year
1996 were legally issued, fully paid and
non-assessable.

Berwyn Income Fund, Inc., is a corporation incorporated
under the laws of the Common-wealth of Pennsylvania
on December 26, 1986.  Under its Articles
of Incorporation, the Fund has the power to
issue 20,000,000 shares of common stock.
On February 7,1987, a shareholder
resolution was approved that authorized the Board of
Directors to issue shares of common stock in such
amounts and proportions as from time to time it
deemed appropriate and the Board was authorized
 to set the price at which shares would be sold.

On June 10, 1987, the Board approved a resolution
authorizing the sale of 2,000,000 shares of common
stock to the public.  The resolution directed that prior
to sale, the shares be registered with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission and various
states and that the shares be sold at their net asset
value and that they be fully paid and non-assessable
when issued.  The share registration with the
Securities and Exchange Commission became
effective September 3, 1987.

On December 11, 1992, the Board authorized the
Fund to register an indefinite number of shares
of common stock for sale with the Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to rule 24f of the
Investment Company Act of 1940.

Registration under Rule 24f became effective on
March 24, 1993.  Under section 1524 of the
Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law of 1988,
shares of stock sold by Pennsylvania corporations after
December 1988, will be deemed fully paid and
non-assessable unless there are contrary provisions
in Articles of Incorporation or By Laws.  
There are no provisions in the Fund's Articles or
By Laws that allow the Fund to issue stock that is not
fully paid or to issue assessable stock.

Based upon the foregoing facts, it is my opinion that
 the shares issued in 1996 were legally issued, fully
 paid and non-assessable.



				KEVIN M. RYAN 
				Kevin M. Ryan
				Counsel to the Fund
EXHIBIT 23.1



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form F-3, Registration No. 333-12074, Registration No. 333-115598 and
Registration No. 333-117954 and on Form S-8 Registration No. 333-12844 and
Registration No. 333-111437, pertaining to the RADA Electronic Industries Ltd.'s
1993, 1994, 1996, 1999 Stock Option Plans, and warrants to directors and
pertaining to the Prospectus of RADA Electronic Industries Ltd. for the
registration of 13,507,146 shares of its Ordinary shares of our report dated
March 1, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of RADA
Electronic Industries Ltd. and its subsidiary included in the Annual Report on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004.




                                             /S/ Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasirer
                                             Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasirer
                                             A Member of Ernst & Young Global

Tel Aviv, March 30, 2005