alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.818 Use of insulated cable handling equipment. ( a ) Energized high-voltage cables must not be handled except when motor or shearer cables need to be trained. When cables need to be trained, high-voltage insulated gloves, mitts, hooks, tongs, slings, aprons, or other personal protective equipment capable of providing protection against shock hazard must be used to prevent direct contact with the cable.
( b ) High-voltage insulated gloves, sleeves, and other insulated personal protective equipment must— ( 1 ) Have a voltage rating of at least Class 1 (7,500 volts) that meets or exceeds ASTM F496-97, “Standard Specification for In-Service Care of Insulating Gloves and Sleeves” (1997).
( 2 ) Be examined before each use for visible signs of damage;
( 3 ) Be removed from the underground area of the mine or destroyed when damaged or defective; and
( 4 ) Be electrically tested every 6 months in accordance with publication ASTM F496-97. ASTM F496-97 (Standard Specification for In-Service Care of Insulating Gloves and Sleeves, 1997) is incorporated by reference and may be inspected at any MSHA Coal Mine Safety and Health District Office, or at MSHA's Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances, 201 12th Street South, Arlington, VA 22202-5452; 202-693-9440; and at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .* In addition, copies of the document can be purchased from the American Society for Testing and Materials, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959; 610-832-9500; *http://www.astm.org .* This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
[67 FR 11001, Mar. 11, 2002, as amended at 67 FR 38386, June 4, 2002; 71 FR 16668, Apr. 3, 2006; 80 FR 52992, Sept. 2, 2015]
#### WARD et al., Appellants, v. SMITH et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 24, 1905.)

Action by Joseph Ward, Jr., and others against William E. R. Smith and others. E. W. S. Johnston, for appellants. O. J. Shearn, for respondents. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
### Microfossil correlation of California lower Tertiary sections; a comparison

By: Richard Z. Poore

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp743F

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### §§ 250.440-250.451 [Reserved]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 25, 2015

Order 

Clerk

March 25, 2015

150146(53)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant, SC: 150146

v COA: 314705

Wayne CC: 12-010198-FH

PAUL CHARLES SEEWALD, Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Prosecuting Attorneys Association 

of Michigan to participate in oral argument is DENIED.
#### § 581.30 Minimum royalty.

Unless otherwise specified in the leasing notice, each lease issued pursuant to the regulations in this part shall require the payment of a specified minimum annual royalty beginning with the year in which OCS minerals are produced (sold, transferred, used, or otherwise disposed of) from the leasehold except that the annual rentals shall apply during any year that royalty free production is in effect pursuant to § 581.28(b). Minimum royalty payments shall be offset by royalty paid on production during the lease year. Minimum royalty payments are due at the beginning of the lease year and payable by the end of the month following the end of the lease year for which they are due.
Pierce

Peak

Corner

Well

Dog

Mountains

Campbell

Well

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

4600

4500

4700

4800

4600 4600

4600

4600

4500

4500

4700

4600

4800

4600

4600

T34S R14W

10

22

03

15

12

13

24

14

15

23

22

11

10

01

HID

A

L

G

O

C

O

HIDALGO CO NEW MEXICO

N

E

W

M

E

XIC

O

ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS

E

S

T

A

D

O

S

U

NID

O

S

M

E

XIC

A

N

O

S

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U

NIT

E

D

S

T

A

T

E

S

O

F

A

M

E

RIC

A

Corner

Well

65

34

17'

FEET

68

66

7

34

7

000m

000 FEET

17'

22'

34

63

66

71

000

73

7 7

68

7

34

000m

34

12'

E

15'

630

64

72

15'

07'

34

20'

69

70

30"

N

34

71

108°

71

65

7

70

68

63

FEET

7

64

34

34

61

62

34

108° 7

34

31°

130

74

600

34

34

34

63

67

7 70

100

34

34

N

10'

7

34

7

2 65 30"

2

10'

34

69

7 7

34

64

7

30"

000

34

20'

67

7

66

7 30" 7

34

7 69

66

7

34

108°

34

30"

70

000 FEET

67

30"

62

15' 12' 7

71

34

31°

34

67

61

69

34

72

72

7

34

E

000m

72

73

30"

000m 31°

31° 65

15'

63

74

68

07'

62

73

7

108°

30"

34

22' 64

NEW

MEXICO

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

CORNER WELL QUADRANGLE

NEW MEXICO-CHIHUAHUA

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

CORNER WELL, NM-CHH

2013

Expressway Local Connector

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

Secondary Hwy Local Road

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

Imagery...................................................NAIP, May 2011

Roads..............................................©2006-2013 TomTom

Names..........................................................GNIS, 2013

Hydrography....................National Hydrography Dataset, 2011

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2008

Boundaries....................Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2012

Public Land Survey System..................................BLM, 2011

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 12R

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: New Mexico Coordinate System of 1983 (west

zone)

This map is not a legal document. Boundaries may be

generalized for this map scale. Private lands within government

reservations may not be shown. Obtain permission before

entering private lands.

This map was produced to conform with the

National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.15

CONTOUR INTERVAL 20 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988

SCALE 1:24 000

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

YV

12R

×

Ù

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2013 MAGNETIC NORTH

DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

1° 28 ́

26 MILS

9° 14 ́

164 MILS
#### § 550.1462 How may I request a hearing on the record on a Notice of Noncompliance regarding violations without a period to correct?

You may request a hearing on the record of a Notice of Noncompliance regarding violations without a period to correct by filing a request within 30 days after you receive the Notice of Noncompliance with the Hearings Division (Departmental), Office of Hearings and Appeals, U.S. Department of the Interior, 351 South West Temple, Suite 6.300, Salt Lake City, Utah 84101. You may do this regardless of whether you correct the violations identified in the Notice of Noncompliance.

[76 FR 64623, Oct. 18, 2011, as amended at 80 FR 57096, Sept. 22, 2015]
### [§30168. Repealed. Pub. L. 112–141, div. C, title I, §31204(b)(2)(B), July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 760]

Section, Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 971; Pub. L. 104–287, §5(58), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3394, related to research, testing, development, and training.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 2012, see section 3(a) of Pub. L. 112–141, set out as an Effective and Termination Dates of 2012 Amendment note under section 101 of Title 23, Highways.
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.607 Breaking trailing cable and power cable connections.

[Statutory Provisions]

Trailing cable and power cable connections to junction boxes shall not be made or broken under load.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0402

_________________

IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP 

OF: 

J.S.M., 

 A Minor Child:

DIANA R. MERIDETH and KENNETH M. 

MERIDETH,

 Petitioners, Appellees and Cross 

Appellants,

________________________________________

IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP 

OF:

J.S.M., 

 A Minor Child:

CAROL M. MERIDETH,

 Petitioner and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

This Court reviews briefs to ensure compliance with Rules 11 and 12 of the 

Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure. After reviewing the Appellees/Cross Appellant’s

combined answer and opening brief filed electronically on January 19, 2021, this Court 

has determined that the brief does not comply with the below-referenced Rule and must 

be resubmitted. 

M. R. App. P. 10(6) requires the use of initials in reference to minor children. 

Appellees/Cross Appellant’s brief contains the first names of the minor children on pages 

9, 10, and 13.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the referenced brief is rejected. 

01/19/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0402
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within ten (10) days of the date of this Order the 

Appellees/Cross Appellants shall electronically file with the Clerk of this Court a revised 

brief containing the revisions necessary to comply with the specified Rule and that the 

Appellees/Cross Appellants shall serve copies of the revised brief on all parties of record;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no changes, additions, or deletions other than 

those specified in this Order may be made to the brief as originally filed; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the times for any subsequent briefing contained 

in M. R. App. P. 13 shall run from the date of filing of the revised brief.

The Clerk is directed to provide a true copy of this Order to the Appellees/Cross 

Appellants and to all parties of record. 

Electronically signed by:

Dirk Sandefur

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 19 2021
§ 732.16 Terms and conditions for State programs. Terms and conditions for the implementation, administration and operation of a State program may be established by the Director as necessary, including, but not limited to— ( a ) Establishing a system for regularly reporting to the Office information collected by the State regulatory authority in the conduct of the State program; and
( b ) Providing the Office with access to books and records of the regulatory authority upon request.
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of Levon Resources Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Ron Tremblay, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: October 12, 2007

 

/s/ Ron Tremblay
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                      24,138,198
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               27,615,137
<ALLOWANCES>                                   653,586
<INVENTORY>                                 16,061,453
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            70,123,214
<PP&E>                                      32,888,384
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,339,093
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              98,372,331
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,750,906
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,588
<OTHER-SE>                                  79,898,763
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                98,372,331
<SALES>                                     52,859,523
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            52,859,523
<CGS>                                       19,263,336
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,263,336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (75,627)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,313,891
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,063,576
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,250,315
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,250,315
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50
        

</TABLE>
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

38 39 40 41



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 08/04 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 04 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL
### §10746. Demurrage charges

A rail carrier providing transportation subject to the jurisdiction of the Board under this part shall compute demurrage charges, and establish rules related to those charges, in a way that fulfills the national needs related to—

(1) freight car use and distribution; and

(2) maintenance of an adequate supply of freight cars to be available for transportation of property.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §102(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 821.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 10750 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

A prior section 10746, Pub. L. 95–473, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1393, related to transportation of commodities manufactured or produced by rail carrier, prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
### §24303. Officers

(a) Appointment and Terms.—Amtrak has a President and other officers that are named and appointed by the board of directors of Amtrak. An officer of Amtrak must be a citizen of the United States. Officers of Amtrak serve at the pleasure of the board.

(b) Pay.—The board may fix the pay of the officers of Amtrak. An officer may not be paid more than the general level of pay for officers of rail carriers with comparable responsibility. The preceding sentence shall not apply for any fiscal year for which no Federal assistance is provided to Amtrak.

(c) Conflicts of Interest.—When employed by Amtrak, an officer may not have a financial or employment relationship with another rail carrier, except that holding securities issued by a rail carrier is not deemed to be a violation of this subsection if the officer holding the securities makes a complete public disclosure of the holdings and does not participate in any decision directly affecting the rail carrier.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 907; Pub. L. 105–134, title II, §207, Dec. 2, 1997, 111 Stat. 2584.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 24303(a) | 45:543(d) (1st, 4th, 5th sentences). | Oct. 30, 1970, Pub. L. 91–518, §303(d), 84 Stat. 1331; June 22, 1972, Pub. L. 92–316, §1(a), 86 Stat. 227; May 26, 1975, Pub. L. 94–25, §2, 89 Stat. 90; July 18, 1982, Pub. L. 97–216, §101 (par. under heading "Grants to the National Railroad Passenger Corporation"), 96 Stat. 187; June 22, 1988, Pub. L. 100–342, §18(c), 102 Stat. 636. |
| 24303(b) | 45:543(d) (2d, 3d sentences). | |
| 24303(c) | 45:543(d) (last sentence). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "of directors of Amtrak" are added for clarity.

In subsection (b), the words "rates of", "president and other", and "at a level" are omitted as surplus.

In subsection (c), the words "direct or indirect" are omitted as surplus. The word "another" is substituted for "any" for clarity.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1997—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 105–134 inserted at end "The preceding sentence shall not apply for any fiscal year for which no Federal assistance is provided to Amtrak."
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9600 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

119 Main Street in Plains, Georgia, as the ‘‘Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter 

Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 16, 2024 

Mr. BISHOP of Georgia (for himself, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. CARTER of Georgia, Mr. 

CLYDE, Mr. COLLINS, Mr. FERGUSON, Ms. GREENE of Georgia, Mr. 

JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. LOUDERMILK, Mrs. MCBATH, Mr. MCCORMICK, Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia, and 

Ms. WILLIAMS of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 119 Main Street in Plains, Georgia, as the 

‘‘Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JIMMY AND ROSALYNN CARTER POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 119 Main Street in Plains, Geor6 gia, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Jimmy and 

7 Rosalynn Carter Post Office’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9600 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Jimmy and Rosalynn 

5 Carter Post Office’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### § 769.19 Regulatory policy.

Once an area of Federal lands is designated as unsuitable for all or certain types of surface coal mining operations, any permit or lease shall be conditioned in a manner so as to limit or prohibit surface coal mining operations on the designated areas in accordance with the designation.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed September 15, 2020 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01511-CV 

IN RE CEDRIC WHITEHURST 

On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-19-18502 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Schenck, Osborne, and Partida-Kipness 

Opinion by Justice Osborne 

We questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal from an associate judge’s 

order denying a petition to change name as it appeared prematurely filed. See TEX.

FAM.CODE ANN. § 45.103. Under the Texas Family Code, an associate judge’s order 

becomes the order of the referring court and triggers the appellate deadlines if it is 

an agreed order, a default order, or a final order in a case in which the parties, prior 

to the start of the hearing conducted by the associate judge, waived in writing the 

right to a de novo hearing before the referring court. See id. §§ 201.007(a)(16),(c); 

201.016(c). Otherwise, the appellate deadlines are triggered only upon the signing 

of the order by the referring court. See id. § 201.016(b). 
 –2– 

Because the appealed order is not an agreed or default order and nothing in 

the record reflected the right to a de novo hearing was waived, in fact the record 

reflected the referring court held a de novo hearing but did not sign the associate 

judge’s order, we directed appellant to file a letter brief addressing our concern. 

More than ten days have passed, however, and appellant has not complied. 

We cautioned appellant, when we directed him to file a letter brief, that failure 

to comply could result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. 

Accordingly, as nothing before the Court reflects the appellate deadlines have been 

triggered, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX.R. APP. P. 42.3(a). 

191511F.P05 

 

/Leslie Osborne/ 

LESLIE OSBORNE 

JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

IN RE CEDRIC WHITEHURST 

No. 05-19-01511-CV 

 On Appeal from the 330th Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-19-18502. 

Opinion delivered by Justice 

Osborne, Justices Schenck and 

Partida-Kipness participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. 

Judgment entered September 15, 2020