alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 244 (Friday, December 18, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 82565-82566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27968]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD

[Docket No. EP 290 (Sub-No. 5) (2021-1)]


Quarterly Rail Cost Adjustment Factor

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Approval of rail cost adjustment factor.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board has approved the first quarter 2021 Rail Cost 
Adjustment Factor (RCAF) and cost index filed by the Association of 
American Railroads. The first quarter 2021 RCAF (Unadjusted) is 1.040. 
The first quarter 2021 RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.434. The first quarter 2021 
RCAF-5 is 0.410.

DATES: Applicability Date: January 1, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pedro Ramirez, (202) 245-0333. 
Assistance for the hearing impaired is

[[Page 82566]]

available through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision, which is available on our website, http://www.stb.gov. Copies of the decision may be purchased by contacting the 
Office of Public Assistance, Governmental Affairs, and Compliance at 
(202) 245-0238.

    Decided: December 14, 2020.

    By the Board, Board Members Begeman, Fuchs, and Oberman.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2020-27968 Filed 12-17-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
§ 715.12 Signs and markers. ( a ) *Specifications.* All signs required to be posted shall be of a standard design that can be seen and read easily and shall be made of durable material. The signs and other markers shall be maintained during all operations to which they pertain and shall conform to local ordinances and codes.
( b ) *Mine and permit identification signs.* Signs identifying the mine area shall be displayed at all points of access to the permit area from public roads and highways. Signs shall show the name, business address, and telephone number of the permittee and identification numbers of current mining and reclamation permits or other authorizations to operate. Such signs shall not be removed until after release of all bonds.
( c ) *Perimeter markers.* The perimeter of the permit area shall be clearly marked by durable and easily recognized markers, or by other means approved by the regulatory authority.
( d ) *Buffer zone markers.* Buffer zones as defined in § 715.17 shall be marked in a manner consistent with the perimeter markers along the interior boundary of the buffer zone.
( e ) *Blasting signs.* If blasting is necessary to conduct surface coal mining operations, signs reading “Blasting Area” shall be displayed conspicuously at the edge of blasting areas along access and haul roads within the mine property. Signs reading “Blasting Area” and explaining the blasting warning and all-clear signals shall be posted at all entrances to the permit area.
( f ) *Topsoil markers.* Where topsoil or other vegetation-supporting material is segregated and stockpiled according to § 715.16(c), the stockpiled material shall be marked. Markers shall remain in place until the material is removed.
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.1714 Availability of approved self-rescue devices; instruction in use and location. ( a ) Each operator shall make available to each miner who goes underground, and to visitors authorized to enter the mine by the operator, an approved self-rescue device or devices which is adequate to protect such person for 1 hour or longer.
( b ) Before any person authorized by the operator goes underground, the operator shall instruct and train such person in accordance with provisions set forth in 30 CFR part 48.
[43 FR 54246, Nov. 21, 1978, as amended at 53 FR 10336, Mar. 30, 1988; 60 FR 30401, June 8, 1995; 71 FR 71454, Dec. 8, 2006]
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION



I, Bernard Kravitz, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Dionics, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Dated:    July 14, 2008

By:

/s/ Bernard Kravitz

Bernard Kravitz,

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)







1
No. 8161.

#### Rector, Trustee, *v.*The Commercial National Bank.

(Decided November 24, 1903.)

Error to Circuit Court of Franklin county.

*Messrs. Pugh & Pugh*and *Mr. Thomas E. Steele,.*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. F. F. D. Albery,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Burket, C. J., Davis and Shauck, JJ., concur.

Price, J., dissents.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                          1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                  Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                               10,588
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     16,753
<PP&E>                                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       16,753
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                19,741
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               4
<COMMON>                                                675
<OTHER-SE>                                            3,667 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         16,753
<SALES>                                              (8,263)
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    (20,435)
<CGS>                                                 4,492
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        12,738
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        140
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        468
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      374 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (16,345)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          (313)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      (16,658)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (16,658)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.21)
        


</TABLE>
#### § 57.12010 Isolation or insulation of communication conductors.

Telephone and low-potential signal wire shall be protected, by isolation or suitable insulation, or both, from contacting energized power conductors or any other power source.
§ 585.413 How do I consolidate leases or grants? ( a ) You may apply to consolidate all or part of two or more adjacent leases or grants held by the same lessee or grant holder into one new lease or grant, subject to BOEM's approval. The application must include a description of the leases or grants, or portions thereof, to be consolidated, including the relevant lease number, lease blocks, and aliquots.
( b ) An approved consolidation will create a new lease or grant that will be subject to the terms and conditions of the consolidated leases or grants.
( c ) To the extent the leases or grants to be consolidated have different times remaining in the relevant lease or grant periods, BOEM will default to using the shorter remaining periods in the new lease or grant but will consider requests for a revised lease or grant period schedule included in the consolidation application.
( d ) To the extent the leases or grants to be consolidated have other different terms and conditions, BOEM will default to using the terms and conditions in the most recently issued lease or grant to be consolidated for the new lease. BOEM will consider requests for modifications on a case-by-case basis and, in its discretion, approve such requests for good cause.
( e ) Before BOEM will approve your consolidation request, BOEM will assess appropriate financial assurance obligations for the new lease or grant per §§ 585.516 and 585.517 or §§ 585.520 and 585.521.
( f ) Any consolidated leases and grants that have been absorbed into the new lease or grant in their entirety will be considered terminated at the time of consolidation approval.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JORGE MARTINEZ,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 36 EAL 2024

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of July, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.

Justice McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
§ 581.12 Request for OCS mineral information and interest. ( a ) When considering whether to offer OCS minerals for lease, the Secretary, upon the Department of the Interior's own initiative or as a result of a submission under § 581.11, may request indications of interest in the leasing of a specific OCS mineral, a group of OCS minerals, or all OCS minerals in the area being considered for lease. Requests for information and interest shall be published in the Federal Register and may be published elsewhere.
( b ) States and local governments, industry, other Federal Agencies, and all interested parties (including the public) may respond to a request for information and interest. All information provided to the Secretary will be considered in the decision whether to proceed with additional steps leading to the offering of OCS minerals for lease.
( c ) The Secretary may request specific information concerning the offering of a specific OCS mineral, a group of OCS minerals, or all OCS minerals in a broad area for lease or the offering of one or more discrete tracts which represent a minable orebody. The Secretary's request may ask for comments on OCS areas which have been determined to warrant special consideration and analysis. Requests may be for comments concerning geological conditions or archaeological resources on the seabed; multiple uses of the area proposed for leasing, including navigation, recreation and fisheries; and other socioeconomic, biological, and environmental information relating to the area proposed for leasing.
<PAGE>
                                                               Exhibit 10.11A


                    AMENDMENT AND ADDENDUM TO PROMISSORY NOTE

      FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Four SAC Self-Storage Corporation, a
Nevada corporation ("Maker"), hereby amends that certain Promissory Note (the
"Note") dated as of October 1, 1995 in the original principal amount of
$10,000,000 payable to the order of Nationwide Commercial Co. ("Payee"), as
follows. Capitalized words used herein and not otherwise defined herein have the
meaning ascribed to such words in the Note.

      Section 2(a) of the Note is hereby amended to provide that effective as of
April 1, 2002, Basic Interest (which, for clarity, includes Pay Rate Interest
and Deferred Interest) is payable on a monthly basis, in arrears, on the first
business day of each month throughout the term of the Note.

      In addition, Section 2(e) of the Note is hereby amended to provide that
effective as of April 1, 2002, Cash Flow Contingent Interest is payable on a
monthly basis, in arrears, on the first business day of the month throughout the
term of the Note.

      The Note remains in full force and effect and is not amended in any
respect, except as expressly provided herein.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned executes this Amendment and Addendum
to Promissory Note as of April 16, 2002.

                                               Four SAC Self-Storage Corporation


                                               By: _____________________________
                                                    Bruce Brockhagen, Secretary


      Payee hereby agrees and consents to the above-described amendment to the
Note this 16th day of April, 2002.

                                               Nationwide Commercial Co.


                                               By: _____________________________
                                                     Gary B. Horton, Secretary
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Woodrow Sharp, Appellant.

[831 NYS2d 712]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered October 12, 2005, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of *262burglary in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490 [1987]). Moreover, we find the evidence to be overwhelming. Defendant’s unlawful entry into a store with intent to commit a crime therein was established by his own statements to the arresting officer, as well as by the officer’s observations and the surrounding circumstances.

Any error regarding the prosecutor’s summation was harmless. Concur—Saxe, J.E, Friedman, Sweeny, McGuire and Malone, JJ.
Order entered March 3, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00138-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T.J.S., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-14-15124

ORDER

On February 27, 2015, appellant filed a motion asking this Court to review the trial 

court’s February 19, 2015 order sustaining the contest to his affidavit of indigence. A 

supplemental clerk’s record was filed on March 2, 2015 containing the trial court’s order 

sustaining the contest. However, the contest to the affidavit of indigence was not included in the 

supplemental clerk’s record. Accordingly, we ORDER Felicia Pitre to file, by MARCH 4, 

2015, a supplemental clerk’s record containing the contest filed on February 10, 2015 by 

Francheska Duffey, Official Court Reporter for the 330th Judicial District Court of Dallas 

County, Texas. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(j)(3).

We ORDER Francheska Duffey to file, by 3:00 P.M. on MARCH 5, 2015, the 

reporter’s record from the hearing on the contest held on February 19, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P.

20.1(j)(3).
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order by electronic 

transmission to the Honorable Andrea Plumlee, Judge of the 330th Judicial District Court, 

Felicia Pitre, Francheska Duffey, appellant, and counsel for appellee.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9716 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9716

 To amend the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 
to require the Congressional Budget Office to provide baseline updates, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 20, 2024

Mr. Moore of Utah introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                      the Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 
to require the Congressional Budget Office to provide baseline updates, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Increasing Baseline Updates Act''.

SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE UPDATES TO BASELINE.

    Section 202(e) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control 
Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 602(e)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(4)(A) The Director shall, to the extent practicable, 
        submit to the Committees on the Budget of the House of 
        Representatives and the Senate at least two updates to the 
        baseline submitted under paragraph (1). At least one of the 
        updates shall include economic data used by the Director to 
        calculate such update.
            ``(B) Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit 
        the Director from providing any other update to the baseline 
        during such year.''.

SEC. 3. ANNUAL TECHNICAL BUDGET DATA SUBMISSION BY THE PRESIDENT.

    Section 1106 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(d) On or before February 1 of each calendar year, the President 
shall submit to Congress technical budget data for the fiscal year 
beginning in the ensuing calendar year, which shall include up-to-date 
estimates for current year and prior year data and credit reestimates 
for the current year (as included in the Federal credit supplement of 
such budget).''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 57.6403 Branch circuits. ( a ) If electric blasting includes the use of branch circuits, each branch shall be equipped with a safety switch or equivalent method to isolate the circuits to be used.
( b ) At least one safety switch or equivalent method of protection shall be located outside the blast area and shall be in the open position until persons are withdrawn.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 26, 2022

NO. 03

- 22

- 00327

- CV

J. G. , Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFOR E JU STICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND KELLY

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the decree terminating parental rights signed by the tr i a l court on May 17,

2022

. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no

reversible error in the decree

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s t erminati o n decree

.

Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6966

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

HAROLD EUGENE BOOKER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CR-93-81-N, CA-96-232)

Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 5, 1996

Before HALL, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harold Eugene Booker, Appellant Pro Se. William David Muhr, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988), amended by Antiterrorism and

Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat.

1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Booker, No. CR-93-81-N; CA-96-232 (E.D. Va. May

15, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT
               TO RULE 13a-14(b)
______________________________________________________________________________


In connection with the Annual Report of Gallery of History, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Todd Axelrod, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Todd Axelrod
________________
Todd Axelrod
Chief Executive Officer

December 26, 2008