alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 12-17

                           THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                          Three
                                                          Months                  Year Ended December 31       
                                                          Ended          ---------------------------------------------
                                                          3/31/99        1998              1997            1996
                                                          -------        ----              ----            ----

                                                                       (Millions, except for ratio)

<S>                                                       <C>            <C>              <C>              <C>     
Net income.............................................   $       104    $       418      $      417       $       328
                                                          -----------    -----------      ----------       -----------

Taxes based on income:
   Income taxes........................................            49            260             288               225
   Municipal and state.................................             1              3               4                 3
                                                           ----------    -----------      ----------       -----------
     Total taxes based on income.......................            50            263             292               228
                                                           ----------    -----------      ----------       -----------

Fixed charges:
   Interest expense....................................            68            278             282               291
   Allowance for funds used during
     construction......................................             2              -               -                 -
   Interest factor of rents............................             9             34              34                34
                                                           ----------    -----------      ----------       -----------
     Total fixed charges...............................            79            312             316               325
                                                           ==========    ===========      ==========       ===========

Earnings before taxes based on income
   and fixed charges...................................   $       233    $       933      $    1,025       $       881
                                                          ===========    ===========      ==========       ===========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                               2.94           3.18            3.24              2.71
</TABLE>
# C_2023265EN.01001001.xml

| 28.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 265/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 265/10

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.11195 – ICI 3 / HCS GROUP)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 265/07)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | International Chemical Investors 3 S.E. (‘ICI 3’) (Luxembourg), belonging to the International Chemical Investors Group which is solely controlled by a private individual, |
| --- | --- |

—

International Chemical Investors 3 S.E. (‘ICI 3’) (Luxembourg), belonging to the International Chemical Investors Group which is solely controlled by a private individual,

| — | Haltermann Besitzgesellschaft GmbH, HCS Group GmbH, and HCS Holding GmbH and its affiliated companies (the ‘HCS Group’)(Germany), controlled by H.I.G. Capital LLC, a private equity investment firm. |
| --- | --- |

—

Haltermann Besitzgesellschaft GmbH, HCS Group GmbH, and HCS Holding GmbH and its affiliated companies (the ‘HCS Group’)(Germany), controlled by H.I.G. Capital LLC, a private equity investment firm.

ICI 3 will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of the HCS Group.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | ICI 3 is an industrial group of companies focusing on midsized pharmaceutical and chemicals businesses, notably in fine chemicals, chlorovinyls and compounds, |
| --- | --- |

—

ICI 3 is an industrial group of companies focusing on midsized pharmaceutical and chemicals businesses, notably in fine chemicals, chlorovinyls and compounds,

| — | The HCS Group is a globally active provider of speciality solvents and additives. |
| --- | --- |

—

The HCS Group is a globally active provider of speciality solvents and additives.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.11195 – ICI 3 / HCS GROUP

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
R2=0.7016100120140160180200

ehyde Emissions (ppm @ 3% O2)ChartH‐1a:ReportedFormaldehydeEmissionsvs.ReportedCOEmissions‐AllData0‐130ppmCO130+ppmCOR2=0.02240204060800 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000

Reported FormaldReportedCarbonMonoxideEmissions(ppm@3%O2)130+ppmCOLinear(0‐130ppmCO)Linear(130+ppmCO)5678910

ehyde Emissions (ppm @ 3% O2)ChartH‐1b:ReportedFormaldehydeEmissionsvs.ReportedCOEmissions‐AllData0‐130ppmCO130to300ppmCO300to500ppmCOR2=0.0097R2=0.0606R2=0.0351R2=0.1217012340 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

Reported FormaldReportedCarbonMonoxideEmissions(ppm@3%O2)500to1000ppmCOLinear(0‐130ppmCO)Linear(130to300ppmCO)Linear(300to500ppmCO)Linear(500to1000ppmCO)5678910

ehyde Emissions (ppm @ 3% O2)ChartH‐1c:ReportedFormaldehydeEmissionsvs.ReportedCOEmissions‐AllData0to1000ppmCO@3%O2(Quadratic)0‐1000ppmCOPoly.(0‐1000ppmCO)Minimum ValuesonQuadraticPolynomialRegressionLine:Formaldehyde:0.1619ppm@3%O2CO:206ppm@3%O2y=3E‐06x2‐0.0012x+0.2828R2=0.1095012340 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

Reported FormaldReportedCarbonMonoxideEmissions(ppm@3%O2)
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- Meltech Corp., Inc. Under Contract No. N40080-12-D-1012 APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 61892

Leonard A. Sacks, Esq.

Leonard A. Sacks & Associates, P.C. Rockville, MD Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

Navy ChiefTrial Attorney Matthew S. Hawkins, Esq.

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: March 28, 2019

Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61892, Appeal ofMeltech Corp., Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:
JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-4369

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Richard Beason

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock

____________

 Submitted: July 31, 2017

Filed: August 7, 2017

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, Richard Beason challenges the conviction and

sentence the district court imposed after he pleaded guilty to a drug charge, pursuant 1

The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern 1

District of Arkansas.
to a written plea agreement which included an appeal waiver. His counsel has moved

to withdraw and submitted a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

raising the issue that the sentence was unreasonable. Beason has also filed a pro se

supplemental brief, arguing that the government violated his right to a speedy trial,

that his sentence was improperly enhanced, and that there was an insufficient basis

for his conspiracy conviction; and a motion for appointment of new counsel.

We conclude that the appeal waiver is enforceable, because our review of the

record demonstrates that Beason entered into the plea agreement and the appeal

waiver knowingly and voluntarily, see Nguyen v. United States, 114 F.3d 699, 703

(8th Cir. 1997); the argumentsfall within the scope of the waiver; and no miscarriage

of justice would result fromenforcing the waiver, see United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d

702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886,

890-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc). Furthermore, we have independently reviewed the

record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous

issues for appeal outside the scope of the waiver.

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, deny the motion for new

counsel, and dismiss this appeal.

______________________________

-2-
### §41908. Effect on foreign postal arrangements

This part does not—

(1) affect an arrangement made by the United States Government with the postal administration of a foreign country related to the transportation of mail by aircraft; or

(2) impair the authority of the United States Postal Service to make such an arrangement.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1157, §41912; renumbered §41908, Pub. L. 110–405, §2(b)(7)(B), Oct. 13, 2008, 122 Stat. 4289.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 41912 | 49 App.:1375(e)(1). | Aug. 23, 1958, Pub. L. 85–726, §405(e)(1), 72 Stat. 761. |

Section

In clause (1), the words "abrogate or" are omitted as being included in "affect".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 41908, Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1156, related to prices for transporting mail of foreign countries, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 110–405, §2(b)(7)(A), (c), Oct. 13, 2008, 122 Stat. 4289, 4290, effective Oct. 1, 2008.

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–405, which directed the amendment of this chapter by renumbering section 49112 as this section, was executed by renumbering section 41912 of this title as this section to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9600 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9600

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 9, 2024

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 119 Main Street in Plains, Georgia, as the ``Jimmy and Rosalynn 
                         Carter Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JIMMY AND ROSALYNN CARTER POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 119 Main Street in Plains, Georgia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Jimmy and 
Rosalynn Carter Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 5, 2024.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
M. P. No. 77-178.

#### Swedish Sauna, Inc. *v.*City of Warwick *et al.*

*Hawkins & Hoopis, Harry J. Hoopis,*for petitioner.

*William J. Too-hey,*City Solicitor, *Frank Cenerini,*Asst. City Solicitor, for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

The stay previously granted by this court is vacated.
§ 550.1491 How will BOEM determine the amount of my bond or other surety instrument? ( a ) BOEM bond-approving officer may approve your surety if he or she determines that the amount is adequate to guarantee payment. The amount of your surety may vary depending on the form of the surety and how long the surety is effective. ( 1 ) The amount of the BOEM-specified surety instrument must include the principal amount owed under the Notice of Noncompliance or Notice of Civil Penalty plus any accrued interest we determine is owed plus projected interest for a 1-year period.
( 2 ) Treasury book-entry bond or note amounts must be equal to at least 120 percent of the required surety amount.
( b ) If your appeal is not decided within 1 year from the filing date, you must increase the surety amount to cover additional estimated interest for another 1-year period. You must continue to do this annually on the date your appeal was filed. We will determine the additional estimated interest and notify you of the amount so you can amend your surety instrument.
( c ) You may submit a single surety instrument that covers multiple appeals. You may change the instrument to add new amounts under appeal or remove amounts that have been adjudicated in your favor or that you have paid, if you: ( 1 ) Amend the single surety instrument annually on the date you filed your first appeal; and
( 2 ) Submit a separate surety instrument for new amounts under appeal until you amend the instrument to cover the new appeals.
Exhibit 10(g)
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
between
INTEGRA BANK CORPORATION
and
RAYMOND D. BECK
 (Effective October 15, 2008)




---



##### 



EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
between
INTEGRA BANK CORPORATION
and
RAYMOND D. BECK
  Recitals
   Agreement
  Effective Date.
 Term of Employment.
 Position and Responsibilities.




---



##### 



Standard of Care.
 Compensation and Benefits.
 Annual Base Salary
 Incentive Bonus.
 Equity Compensation.
 Employee Benefits.
  -2-




---



##### 



Reimbursement of Business Expenses.
 Termination of Employment.
 Termination Due to Death.
 Termination Due to Disability.
    -3-




---



##### 



Termination by the Company Without Cause.
 Termination by the Company For Cause.
   -4-




---



##### 



Termination by the Company in Connection with a Change in Control .
 Termination by Executive For Good Reason
   -5-




---



##### 



-6-




---



##### 



-7-




---



##### 



;
 Termination By Executive Without Good Reason.
 Non-Renewal By Executive.
  -8-




---



##### 



Non-Renewal by the Company.
 Forfeiture of Compensation.
 Resignation as Officer and/or Director Upon Employment Termination.
  -9-




---



##### 



Definition of Change in Control
     -10-




---



##### 



-11-




---



##### 



Severance Release.
 Suspension of Payments Upon Termination.
 Non-Disclosure.
  -12-




---



##### 



Restrictive Covenants.
 Non-Competition.
 Non-Solicitation of Customers.
 Non-Interference With Customers.
  -13-




---



##### 



Non-Interference With Contractors and Vendors.
 Non-Solicitation of Employees
 Direct or Indirect Activities.
 Survival of Restrictive Covenants.
 Extension.
 Severability; Modification of Restrictions.
  -14-




---



##### 



Remedies.
 No Additional Payment to Account for Excise Taxes
 Assignment.
 Assignment by Company.
 Non-Assignment by Executive.
 Notice.
  
  -15-




---



##### 



Miscellaneous.
 Entire Agreement
 Modification.
 Counterparts.
 Tax Withholding.
 Contractual Rights to Benefits.
 No Waiver.
  -16-




---



##### 



Governing Law; Choice of Forum.
 Arbitration of Disputes.
 Interpretation.
  -17-




---



##### 



INTEGRA BANK CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ MICHAEL T. VEA
    
    
    
    /s/ RAYMOND D. BECKName:
    
    Michael T. Vea
    
    
    
    Raymond D. BeckTitle:
    
    Chairman of the Board, Presidentand Chief Executive OfficerCompany
    
    
    
    Executive
  -18-
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2013-0477 Directorate ID: 2011-SW-015-AD

Helicopter Model: Eurocopter Model AS350B, AS350BA, AS350B1, AS350B2, AS350C, AS350D, 

AS350D1 Helicopters and Model AS355E, AS355F, AS355F1, AS355F2, and AS355N Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 791 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to prevent failure of the TGB control lever, loss of 

tail rotor control, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $2,103

Labor per Helicopter

(3 work-hour x $85/workhour to replace a control 

lever)

$255

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $2,358

Total US Fleet Cost $2,358 for replacing a control lever

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Bob Grant
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited financial statements dated September 30, 1998 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         2067000<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                   1184000
<RECEIVABLES>                                 25215000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1251000
<INVENTORY>                                   28993000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              56974000
<PP&E>                                        24416000
<DEPRECIATION>                              (15585000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                80061000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         55826000
<BONDS>                                        9159000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         64000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (4086000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  80061000
<SALES>                                       53375000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              53375000
<CGS>                                         44048000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 13219000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (40000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2180000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (6523000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    472000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            6523000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (6949000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.47)
<FN>
<F1>Dollar amounts are based on conversion rate of 1,652 Lire to the Dollar which
prevailed on September 30, 1998.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1706 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 40 ) IV-E- 1 Docket Number: 

# A-98-1 3

Printed 10/8/2008 10:25:09 AM Sheet 40 of 142

# A-WTS P. 2

MEMORANDU M

TO : Projec t

Fil e - Organi c Liquid s Distributio n NESHA P ES D Projec t

96/0 5 FROM : Marth aSmit h Wast e andChemica

l Processe s Grou p Emissio n Standard s Divisio n DATE : Apri l 25 , 200 2 SUBJECT : Expart e Meetin g with th e American Chemistr y Counci l Thi s memorandu mi s intende dt o documen t ameetin g hel dbetwee n th e American Chemistr y Counci l (ACC ) an dth e Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y (EPA) . Th e participant s wer e Mari o Gambo aofth e American Chemistr y Council , Tar aLanie r

o f Ashlan dChemical , an d Marth aSmit

h ofth e EPA . Th e meetin g too k plac e o n Apri l 17 , 200 2 at EP A i n RTP , NC , it laste don e hour . Thing s tha t

ther e discusse dan dth e AC C mentione dthe y woul db e commentin g o n were : 1 ) I n th e HON , w e (EPA ) allo w 1 0 year s befor e tank s hav e t o b e retrofitte dt o comply . EP A acknowledge dtha t

i t can tak e tha t

lon g before atan k

ha s bee n emptied , cleaned , an di s availabl e for th e retrofit . 2 ) The y wil l b e askin g for vapo r balancin g i n th e rule . I mentione dtha t w e di d no t se e vapo r

balancin g i n th e respons e t o th e ICR , the y acknowledge dtha t wa s certainl y possible . I als o mentione dtha t I was no t certai n tha t

th e for-hire terminal s wer e capabl e o f performin g vapo r

balancin g with reliabl e safet y precautions . The y agreed , bu t pointe dou t

tha t the y (ACC ) wer e capabl e o f performin g with prope r

safet y precautions . 3 ) Ho w i s non-gasolin e defined ? I s diese l anon-gasoline ? Ar e th e gasolin e additive s specifically exclude do r included ? 4)Somethin g els e tha t

the y wil l commen t

o n i s wh y didn' t

w e us e th e standar dstandard s more , LDA Rwas use dbu t

no t WW . 5)The y woul dlike QA/Q C standar dstandard s (that' s no t ou r area ) 5)Marin e vessel s thrupu t

- I' mgoin g t o hav e t o wai t for th e writte n commen t

o n tha t one , I didn' t understan dthei r

concern . 

### tS§f!«20 ! ,*(» ! EP A AI R DOCKE T