alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## A IR 

## F ORCE 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_______ _______ __________ No. ACM S32473

_______ _______ __________ UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Frederick C. LOPEZ Senior Airman (E

- 4) , U.S. Air Force, Appellant

_______ _______ __________ Appeal from the United S tates Air Force Trial Judiciary Decided 31 January 2018

_______ _______ __________ Military Judge: Christopher A. Santoro

. Approved sentence: Bad

- conduct discharge, confinement for 2 months , and reduction to E

- 1. Sentence adjudged 10 April 2017 by SpCM conve ned at Royal Air Force Lakenheath, United Kingdom

. For Appellant: Major Todd M. Swensen , USAF. For Appellee: Lieutenant Colonel Joseph J. Kubler , USAF; Major Mary Ellen Payne, USAF ; Major Meredith L. Steer, USAF. Before HARDING, SPERANZA, and HUYGEN , Appe llate Military Judges

.

_______ _______ __________ This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

_______ _______ __________

PE R CURIAM : The approved findings and sentence are correct i n law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant ’ s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(c), U niform C ode of M ilitary J ustice , 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c).United States v. Lopez , No. ACM S32473

2 Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT

KATHLEEN M. POTTER Acting Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-1996
<CASH>                                      23,573,976
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               24,704,425
<ALLOWANCES>                                   746,027
<INVENTORY>                                 12,586,640
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            63,819,996
<PP&E>                                      30,822,350
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,540,886
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              90,163,087
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,452,257
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  69,988,296
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                90,163,087
<SALES>                                     97,103,054
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            97,103,054
<CGS>                                       34,468,112
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               34,468,112
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               173,930
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             25,586,807
<INCOME-TAX>                                 8,327,449
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         17,259,358
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                17,259,358
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.05
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2




WRITTEN STATEMENT


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cogo Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Frank Zheng Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





August 10, 2011
By:
/s/ Frank ZhengName:  Frank ZhengTitle:  Chief Financial Officer
#### § 19.5 General requirements for approval.

Electric cap lamps shall be complete units. They shall be durable in construction, practical in operation, and suitable for the conditions of underground service. They shall offer no probable explosion hazard if used in gassy or dusty mine atmospheres or bodily hazard from the spilling of the battery electrolyte. They shall exhibit, under laboratory test conditions, the various minimum performance requirements specified in this part.
#### § 57.19105 Landings with more than one shaft entrance.

A safe means of passage around open shaft compartments shall be provided on landings with more than one entrance to the shaft.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM VERITAS
DGC INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                          92,511
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  143,520
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,232
<INVENTORY>                                      3,498
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               257,425
<PP&E>                                         294,703
<DEPRECIATION>                                 141,569
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 474,634
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          105,756
<BONDS>                                         75,340
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           211
<OTHER-SE>                                     283,694
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   474,634
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               388,565
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  249,438
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                58,061
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,061
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 81,066
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,209
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             55,058
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    55,058
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.37
        

</TABLE>
#### Kapp Records, Inc., Appellant-Respondent, v. John Hyland, Respondent-Appellant.

Order, entered on September 11, 1962, granting, in part, defendant’s motion to vacate plaintiff’s notice to examine defendant, and plaintiff’s cross motion to examine defendant as a witness, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, to the extent of denying the motion, granting the cross motion and excising, as improper, the referral of the scope of the examination to Special Term, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to plaintiff-appellant-respondent. In the circumstances an examination of the defendant in his capacity as an adverse party and as a witness should be allowed. No prejudice can result therefrom and the examination sought is proper. Settle order on notice fixing date for examination to proceed. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

____________

No. 09-2127

____________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

ARTHUR HOMER JACKSON,

 Appellant

____________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. No. 08-cr-00115)

District Judge: Honorable Terrence F. McVerry

____________

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

May 19, 2010

Before: FUENTES, HARDIMAN and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges.

____________

JUDGMENT ORDER

____________

This cause came on to be considered on the record from the United States District

Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania and was submitted pursuant to Third

Circuit LAR 34.1(a) on May 19, 2010.

Arthur Homer Jackson appeals his judgment of sentence following his plea of

guilty to violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). At sentencing, the District Court calculated

Jackson’s base offense level as 24 in light of § 2K2.1(a)(2) of the United States

Sentencing Guidelines (USSG), which adopts the definition of “crime of violence” found
2

at USSG § 4B1.2(a) . After finding that Jackson’s two prior convictions for recklessly

endangering another person qualified as crimes of violence under the Guidelines, the

District Court did not consider whether Jackson’s prior conviction for indecent assault or

his two prior convictions for fleeing and eluding police constituted qualifying offenses.

In response to Jackson’s brief on appeal, the Government concedes that Jackson’s

convictions for reckless endangerment are not crimes of violence. See United States v.

Johnson, 587 F.3d 203, 209-10 (3d Cir. 2009). In light of this concession, the parties

have suggested that we remand the case for resentencing. Because we agree with the

parties that these questions should first be considered by the District Court, it is hereby

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the United States District Court

for the Western District of Pennsylvania entered April 3, 2009, be and the same is hereby

VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the United States District Court for the

Western District of Pennsylvania. No costs shall be taxed.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Thomas M. Hardiman

Circuit Judge

ATTEST:

/s/Marcia M. Waldron, 

Clerk

Dated: May 20, 2010
Exhibit 32

Section 1350 Certifications  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:



|May 12, 2004 |  | /s/BRIAN D. FINN
|------------ |  | ----------------
|             |  | Name:           
|             |  | Title:          
|             |  |                 
|             |  |                 
|May 12, 2004 |  | /s/PAUL C. WIRTH
|             |  | Name:           
|             |  | Title:          

---



QuickLinks
§ 57.4361 Underground evacuation drills. ( a ) At least once every six months, mine evacuation drills shall be held to assess the ability of all persons underground to reach the surface or other designated points of safety within the time limits of the self-rescue devices that would be used during an actual emergency.
( b ) The evacuation drills shall— ( 1 ) Be held for each shift at some time other than a shift change and involve all persons underground;
( 2 ) Involve activation of the fire alarm system; and
( 3 ) Include evacuation of all persons from their work areas to the surface or to designated central evacuation points.
( c ) At the completion of each drill, the mine operator shall certify the date and the time the evacuation began and ended. Certifications shall be retained for at least one year after each drill.
§ 71.101 Respirable dust standard when quartz is present. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 28476 , Apr. 18, 2024.
( a ) Each operator shall continuously maintain the average concentration of respirable quartz dust in the mine atmosphere during each shift to which each miner in the active workings of each mine is exposed at or below 0.1 mg/m3 (100 micrograms per cubic meter or μg/m3) as measured with an approved sampling device and expressed in terms of an equivalent concentration.
( b ) When the equivalent concentration of respirable quartz dust exceeds 100 μg/m3, the operator shall continuously maintain the average concentration of respirable dust in the mine atmosphere during each shift to which each miner in the active workings is exposed as measured with an approved sampling device and expressed in terms of an equivalent concentration at or below the applicable standard. The applicable standard is computed by dividing the percent of quartz into the number 10. The application of this formula shall not result in the applicable standard that exceeds the standard established by § 71.100(a) of this section.
Example: Assume the sampled DWP is on a 1.5-mg/m3 dust standard. Suppose a valid representative dust sample with an equivalent concentration of 1.09 mg/m3 contains 16.7% of quartz dust, which corresponds to a quartz concentration of 182 μg/m3. Therefore, the average concentration of respirable dust in the mine atmosphere associated with that DWP shall be maintained on each shift at or below 0.6 mg/m3 (10/16.7% = 0.6 mg/m3).
### §6102. State marine casualty reporting system

(a) The Secretary shall prescribe regulations for a uniform State marine casualty reporting system for vessels. Regulations shall prescribe the casualties to be reported and the manner of reporting. A State shall compile and submit to the Secretary reports, information, and statistics on casualties reported to the State, including information and statistics concerning the number of casualties in which the use of alcohol contributed to the casualty.

(b) The Secretary shall collect, analyze, and publish reports, information, and statistics on marine casualties together with findings and recommendations the Secretary considers appropriate. If a State marine casualty reporting system provides that information derived from casualty reports (except statistical information) may not be publicly disclosed, or otherwise prohibits use by the State or any person in any action or proceeding against a person, the Secretary may use the information provided by the State only in the same way that the State may use the information.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 536; Pub. L. 98–557, §7(b)(2), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2862.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 6102 | 46:1486 |

Section 6102(a) requires the Secretary to prescribe regulations for a uniform State marine casualty reporting system for vessels. The Secretary may limit the scope and types of casualties to be investigated and reported by the State. It also requires the State to submit to the Secretary reports, information, and statistics on casualties reported to the State.

Subsection (b) requires the Secretary to analyze the information that is received from the State. It also prohibits the Secretary from disclosing the information, proceeding against any person based on this information, or otherwise using the information, if the State cannot use the information in the same way.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–557 inserted provisions relating to alcohol as a contributing factor to the casualty.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Plan To Increase Marine Casualty Reporting

Pub. L. 104–324, title III, §314(a), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3922, provided that: "Not later than one year after enactment of this Act [Oct. 19, 1996], the Secretary of Transportation shall, in consultation with appropriate State agencies, submit to the Committee on Resources [now Committee on Natural Resources] of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a plan to increase reporting of vessel accidents to appropriate State law enforcement officials."
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Joe Feldman, Deceased. Yetta Rosengarten, as Administratrix of the Estate of Joe Feldman, Deceased, Appellant; Sarah Bokser, Respondent.

Resettled decree unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, McNally and Eager, JJ.
#### § 57.6301 Blasthole obstruction check.

Before loading, blastholes shall be checked and, wherever possible, cleared of obstructions.
# C_2023154EN.01000201.xml

| 2.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11068 – RLBNW / ASM / BETA PURA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 154/02)

On 25 April 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11068. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11068. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### § 57.19075 Use of open hooks.

Open hooks shall not be used to hoist buckets or other conveyances.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JULMAL LEWIS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 17 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of May, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         808,137
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,312,479
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                         21,663,789
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                       24,220,198
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                         19,267,611
<PP&E>                                         426,520
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              79,559,838
<SHORT-TERM>                                 2,337,938
<PAYABLES>                                  10,392,751
<REPOS-SOLD>                                36,692,568
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                          8,530,793
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                          12,928,650
<LONG-TERM>                                  2,563,206
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          200,000
<PREFERRED>                                    375,000
<COMMON>                                        11,736
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,152,032
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                79,559,838
<TRADING-REVENUE>                              134,723
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                         1,168,240
<COMMISSIONS>                                  399,580
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                  801,861
<FEE-REVENUE>                                   49,737
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             752,107
<COMPENSATION>                               1,317,050
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                447,750
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     447,750
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   276,450
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.29<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.05<F1>
        
<FN>
<F1> Basic and diluted earnings per share amounts have been restated for the
     implementation of SFAS No. 128 "Earnings Per Share" and for the effect of
     the stock split. The restated basic and diluted earnings per share amounts
     at June 30, 1997 totaled $1.65 and $1.47, respectively.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### § 56.6200 Delivery to storage or blast site areas.

Explosive material shall be transported without undue delay to the storage area or blast site.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         104,324
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  233,558<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F2>
<PP&E>                                      12,790,497
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,363,346
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,728,585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F2>
<BONDS>                                      8,792,597
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,028,368
<COMMON>                                     3,399,433
<OTHER-SE>                                   (115,812)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,728,585
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,448,389
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  792,111
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,632
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             475,563
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                174,446
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            174,446
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (440)
<CHANGES>                                     (12,311)
<NET-INCOME>                                   215,308
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.66
<FN>
<F1>RECEIVABLES ARE STATED NET OF ALLOWANCES.
<F2>THE REGISTRANT DOES NOT REPORT USING A CLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET.
</FN>


</TABLE>