alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          72,935
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   748
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    332,359
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      1,700,833
<ALLOWANCE>                                     25,155
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,203,477
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,694,661
<SHORT-TERM>                                    89,989
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             20,088
<LONG-TERM>                                    172,871
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,518
<OTHER-SE>                                     205,570
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,203,477
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                144,193
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               19,672
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   509
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               164,374
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              60,486
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              74,557
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           89,817
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   12,497
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (1,422)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 60,406
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,553
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      30,553
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,644
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.27
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.79
<LOANS-NON>                                     32,025
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,629
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,275
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 73,460
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                18,443
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    7,664
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,879
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               25,155
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            22,990
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,165


</TABLE>
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JUNE 8, 2012

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-11897

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 07-00022-CV-WLS-1

CHARLES A. REHBERG, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus 

JAMES P. PAULK, 

in his individual capacity, 

KENNETH B. HODGES, III, 

in his individual capacity and 

in his official capacity as District

Attorney of Dougherty County

KELLY R. BURKE, in his 

individual capacity, 

Defendants-Appellants, 

DOUGHERTY COUNTY, 

Defendant.
________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Georgia

_________________________

(June 8, 2012)

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE UNITED STATES

Before CARNES, HULL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

On March 21, 2011, the United States Supreme Court granted Plaintiff

Rehberg’s petition for certiorari as to the portion of this Court’s July 16, 2010

decision in Rehberg v. Paulk, 611 F.3d 828, 839–40 (11th Cir. 2010), that

concluded Defendant Paulk had absolute immunity for his grand jury testimony. 

On April 2, 2012, the United States Supreme Court affirmed. Rehberg v. Paulk,

566 U.S. —, 132 S. Ct. 1497 (2012). We now remand this case to the United

States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia for further proceedings

consistent with our July 16, 2010 opinion, and specifically for entry of judgment in

favor of the Defendants on all claims except for the retaliatory prosecution claim

against Paulk in Count 7 of Rehberg’s complaint. 

REMANDED.

2
```

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 245 (Monday, December 21, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 83101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28003]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Institutional Network 
Applications for Promoting Kidney, Urologic, and Hematologic 
Research Training (U2C-TL1).
    Date: March 9-10, 2021.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).
    Contact Person: Jason D. Hoffert, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK National Institutes of Health, 
Room 7343, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 
496-9010, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 15, 2020.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-28003 Filed 12-18-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     AUDITED  BALANCE  SHEET AS OF  DECEMBER  31,  1996,  AND THE  STATEMENT  OF
     OPERATIONS  FOR THE YEAR ENDED  DECEMBER 31, 1996,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
     ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                                        1,000
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                  Dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                                                  0
<SECURITIES>                                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                        0
<PP&E>                                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                          0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                   0
<BONDS>                                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                             0
<COMMON>                                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                            0
<SALES>                                                            43,186
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                   44,057
<CGS>                                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    1,034
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                    43,023
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          394
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                42,629
<DISCONTINUED>                                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                       42,629
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       94.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           0
        


</TABLE>
#### C. W. Armstrong, appellee, v. American Association of Engineers, appellant.

Gen. No. 28,484.

Assumpsit for attorney’s fees. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Thomas J. Peden, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1923.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed October 2, 1923.

Rehearing denied December 15, 1923.

Passett, Abbott & Hughes, for appellant; John E. Hughes, of counsel. Binkley & Mooney, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
**Exhibit
        32.1**
   **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
  In
        connection with the Annual Report of Universal Detection Technology (the
        "Registrant") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2006 as filed
        with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        I,
        Jacques Tizabi, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer
        of
        the Registrant, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
        ss..1350, as adopted pursuant to ss..906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
  (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
        the
        Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.
   Date:
        April 15, 2007
  
 By: /s/
        Jacques Tizabi
 Jacques
        Tizabi,
 Chief
        Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7919

LACY JERVAY TATE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHNATHON A. HART; DEBRORAH CROWDER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior

District Judge. (5:06-ct-03067-H)

Submitted: April 11, 2007 Decided: May 25, 2007

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lacy Jervay Tate, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Lacy Jervay Tate, a North Carolina pre-trial detainee,

seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 (2000) action without prejudice. The notice of appeal was

received in the district court shortly after the expiration of the

appeal period. Because Tate is incarcerated, the notice is

considered filed as of the date it was properly delivered to prison

officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1);

Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988). The record does not

conclusively reveal when Tate gave the notice of appeal to prison

officials for mailing. Accordingly, we remand the case for the

limited purpose of allowing the district court to obtain this

information from the parties and to determine whether the filing

was timely under Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) and Houston v. Lack. The

record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for

further consideration.

REMANDED
§ 570.601 Public Law 88-352 and Public Law 90-284; affirmatively furthering fair housing; Executive Order 11063. ( a ) The following requirements apply according to sections 104(b) and 107 of the Act: ( 1 ) Public Law 88-352, which is title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d *et seq.*), and implementing regulations in 24 CFR part 1.
( 2 ) Public Law 90-284, which is the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601-3620). In accordance with the Fair Housing Act, the Secretary requires that grantees administer all programs and activities related to housing and community development in a manner to affirmatively further the policies of the Fair Housing Act.
( b ) Executive Order 11063, as amended by Executive Order 12259 (3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 652; 3 CFR, 1980 Comp., p. 307) (Equal Opportunity in Housing), and implementing regulations in 24 CFR part 107, also apply.
[61 FR 11477, Mar. 20, 1996, as amended at 80 FR 42368, July 16, 2015; 85 FR 47911, Aug. 7, 2020; 86 FR 30792, June 10, 2021]
#### § 56.12042 Track bonding.

Both rails shall be bonded or welded at every joint and rails shall be crossbonded at least every 200 feet if the track serves as the return trolley circuit. When rails are moved, replaced, or broken bonds are discovered, they shall be rebonded within three working shifts.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

JOSEPH A. PIHS, JR., §

§ No. 189, 2014

Plaintiff Below, §

Appellant, § Court Below:

§

v. § Superior Court of the 

§ State of Delaware, in and for

GIOVANNI PITTARI, § Kent County

§

Defendant Below, § C. A. No. K12C-03-027

Appellee. §

Submitted: October 15, 2014

Decided: October 23, 2014

Before STRINE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and VALIHURA, Justices.

O R D E R

This 23rd day of October 2014, upon consideration of the parties’ briefs and 

the record below, it appears to the Court that Appellant Joseph Pihs, Jr. (“Pihs”) 

raises two issues on appeal. First, he argues that the Superior Court erred in denying 

his motion for judgment as a matter of law on the issue of Appellee Giovanni Pittari’s 

(“Pittari”) negligence. Second, he argues that the Superior Court erred in denying his 

request for a jury instruction concerning a claim under 21 Del. C. § 4168(a). We find 

Superior Court’s decisions to deny the motion for judgment as a matter of law and to 

deny the request to give the jury instruction should be affirmed on the basis of and for 

the reasons assigned by the Superior Court in its rulings on March 25, 2014.
2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the 

Superior Court be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
----

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 4, 2011 |   /s/ John M. Lowber   |
|-------------------|-----------------------------|
|              | John M. Lowber              |
|              | Chief Financial Officer     |
|              | General Communication, Inc. |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995 
<CASH>                                           38228
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            5739
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  1420
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     151369
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           89918
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             92236
<LOANS>                                         664285
<ALLOWANCE>                                       5323
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  979440
<DEPOSITS>                                      774720
<SHORT-TERM>                                     55598
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               9402
<LONG-TERM>                                      20409
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          4697
<OTHER-SE>                                      114614
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  979440
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  55973
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                14030
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  1212
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 71215
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               29005
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2043
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            40167
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      294
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  26
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  26343
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  20254
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       20254
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     13115
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.81
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.77
<LOANS-NON>                                       1037
<LOANS-PAST>                                       906
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   143
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  26560
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  4899
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      608
<RECOVERIES>                                       598
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 5323
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              4099
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           1224
        

</TABLE>
#### (A) William M. Fiorito, Respondent, v. Frank Taskulski, Jr., Doing Business as Fancher Hotel, Appellant. (B) Minnie Lippa, Appellant, v. Columbia L. Winkler, Respondent.

Appeal dismissed unless records and briefs are filed and served on or before January 18, 1961. Respondent’s brief must be filed and served on or before February 2,1961 if appeal is to be argued at February 1961 Term.
§ 717.11 General obligations. ( a ) *Compliance.* All underground coal mining and associated reclamation operations conducted on lands where any element of the operations is regulated by a State shall comply with the initial performance standards of this part according to the time schedule specified in § 710.11. ( 1 ) For the purposes of this part, *underground coal mining and associated reclamation operations* mean a combination of *surface operations* and *underground operations. Surface operations* include construction, use, and reclamation of new and existing access and haul roads, aboveground repair areas, storage areas, processing areas, shipping areas, and areas upon which are sited support facilities including hoist and ventilating ducts, and on which materials incident to underground mining operations are placed. *Underground operations* include underground construction, operation, and reclamation of shafts, adits, underground support facilities, underground mining, hauling, storage, and blasting.
( 2 ) For the purpose of this part the term *permittee* means the person permitted to conduct underground mining operations by a State or if no permit is issued in the State, the person operating a mine.
( 3 ) For the purpose of this part, *Disturbed areas* means surface work areas and lands affected by surface operations including, but not limited to, roads, mine entry excavations, above ground (surface) work areas, such as tipples, coal processing facilities and other operating facilities, waste work and spoil disposal areas, and mine waste impoundments or embankments.
( 4 ) Where State environmental protection standards are adopted for a specific State because they are more stringent than the standards of this part, they will be published in part 718 of this chapter.
( b ) *Authorizations to operate.* A copy of all current permits, licenses, approved plans or other authorizations to operate the mine shall be available for inspection at or near the mine site.