alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>William Capers, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Robert G. Seewald, J.H.O.), rendered September 23, 2013, after a nonjury trial, convicting him of driving while impaired, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Robert G. Seewald, J.H.O.), rendered September 23, 2013, affirmed.</p><p>The verdict convicting defendant of driving while impaired (<i>see</i> Vehicle and Traffic Law ยง 1192[1]) was not against the weight of the evidence (<i>see People v Danielson</i>, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court's credibility determinations, including its assessment of police testimony about defendant's condition upon his arrest (<a href="../2016/2016_00771.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Reyes</i>, 136 AD3d 443</a> [2016]). Furthermore, defendant admitted to the officer that he had consumed "a couple of beers" and the Intoxilyzer 5000 test revealed that defendant's blood alcohol level was .11 percent (<i>see</i> Vehicle and Traffic Law ยง 1195[2][c]). The People were not required to prove that defendant was driving erratically (<a href="../2014/2014_02243.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Fiumara</i>, 116 AD3d 421</a> [2014], <i>lv denied </i>23 NY3d 1036 [2014]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur <br>Decision Date: September 19, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Attachment 020 – Sustainable Futures P2 Assessment for DVBDO

This chemical is the subject of a P2 Assessment for participation in the Sustainable Futures tm Initiative. The P2 assessment summary for Oxirane, 2,2’

- (phenylene)bis - (CAS RN 30424

- 08 -9) , referred to as

DVBDO in the assessment, directly follows this cover letter. This summary includes the collection of results, assessment methods, and conclusions from the Sust ainable Futures tm P2 Framework evaluation of this substance. The original modeling outputs and additional detail will be provided upon request.

Although much measured physical property, ecotoxicity, and human health effect data were available
for the sub stance, predictive methods were employed to complete the hazard and risk assessments of
the substance

.

DVBDO is predicted to have a moderate overall concern for persistence.

DVBDO is predicted to have a low concern for bioaccumulation.

DVBDO is predicted to have a moderate hazard concern for aquatic toxicity

.

DVBDO is predicted to have low a hazard concern for acute human health effects. However, DVBDO is predicted to have a moderate overall human health non

- cancer chronic hazard concern level, based on multiple effects. In additi on, DVBDO is predicted to have a high human health cancer hazard concern
level.

The conclusion of the DVBDO aquatic risk assessment is that, based on lack of exposure, there is a low potential for risk.

The con clusions of the DVBDO human health risk assessment is that there is a low potential for acute risk, as well as chronic risk to the general population from modeled exposure to the substance. However, based on the potential human health chronic hazard conce rns identified for the substance and possible occupational dermal exposure modeled for the substance, the potential for occupational risk may exist for DVBDO

.

In addition, DVBDO is predicted to have a high human health cancer hazard concern by OncoLogic; however, no specific effect level/endpoint (slope factor or q1*) was available on which to quantitate
cancer risk.

It should be noted that, PPE and most engineering controls are not taken into account for purposes of determining overall risk

. The manufac turer indicates that appropriate PPE and engineering controls should be used during activities that may result in exposure to this substance. These include use of skin, eye, and respiratory protection where appropriate. These measures are considered health protective for similar substances, which are currently used by the manufacturer and use customers, and should be health protective for DVBDO as well, leading to a low risk potential from occupational e xposure.

It is our opinion that based on this assessment of the chemical and information included in the PMN submission and manufacturer’s MSDS, including use of appropriate PPE and exposure controls, as well as compliance with regulations and standards already in place, DVBDO will not pose an unreasonable
risk to human health or the environment.3456789101112131415161718192021
#### § 57.19028 End attachment replacement.

Wire rope attachments shall be replaced when cracked, deformed, or excessively worn.
§ 585.315 What deposits are required for a competitive ROW grant or RUE grant? ( a ) You must make a deposit, as required in § 585.501(a), regardless of whether the auction is a sealed-bid, oral, electronic, or other auction format. BOEM will specify in the sale notice the official to whom you must submit the payment, the time by which the official must receive the payment, and the forms of acceptable payment. >
( b ) If your high bid is rejected, we will provide a written statement of reasons.
( c ) For all rejected bids, we will refund, without interest, any money deposited with your bid.
<PAGE>



Exhibit 99.1        Officer's Certificate regarding Annual Statement of
                    Compliance of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp.

                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

The undersigned officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies on behalf of the Company
and on his own behalf for purposes of the Washington Mutual MSC Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-RA3, as follows:

1. I am a duly appointed and qualified First Vice President of the Company.

2. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement related to the
above-referenced series of Certificates.

3. I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate on
behalf of the Company.

4. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and performance under this Agreement has been made under my
supervision.

5. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 29, 2005.





                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.


                     By: /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann
                         -------------------------------------
                         Thomas G. Lehmann
                         First Vice President
#### § 57.8529 Auxiliary fan systems.

When auxiliary fan systems are used, such systems shall minimize recirculation and be maintained to provide ventilation air that effectively sweeps the working places.
Exhibit 32-57
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: July 30, 2010
    /S/ ANTHONY F. EARLEY, JR.Anthony F. Earley, Jr.Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of The Detroit Edison Company
#### Jessie E. Barnes, Respondent, v. Willie Barnes, Appellant.

Application granted to extend time for perfecting appeal, on condition that a demand for respondent’s brief, with proof of service thereof, is filed on .or before November 2, 1960.
§ 71.205T Approved sampling devices; operation; air flowrate. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 28477 , Apr. 18, 2024.
As of April 14, 2025: ( a ) Approved sampling devices shall be operated at the flowrate of 2.0 L/min, if using a CMDPSU; at 2.2 L/min, if using a CPDM; or at a different flowrate recommended by the manufacturer.
( b ) If using a CMDPSU, each sampling device shall be examined each shift by a person certified in sampling during: ( 1 ) The second hour after being put into operation to assure it is in the proper location, operating properly, and at the proper flowrate. If the proper flowrate is not maintained, necessary adjustments shall be made by the certified person.
( 2 ) The last hour of operation to assure that it is operating properly and at the proper flowrate. If the proper flowrate is not maintained, the respirable dust sample shall be transmitted to MSHA with a notation by the certified person on the back of the dust data card stating that the proper flowrate was not maintained. Other events occurring during the collection of respirable dust samples that may affect the validity of the sample, such as dropping of the sampling head assembly onto the mine floor, shall be noted on the back of the dust data card.
( c ) If using a CPDM, the person certified in sampling shall monitor the dust concentrations and the sampling status conditions being reported by the sampling device at mid-shift or more frequently as specified in the approved respirable dust control plan, if applicable, to assure: The sampling device is in the proper location and operating properly; and the work environment of the occupation being sampled remains in compliance with the standard at the end of the shift.
[89 FR 28476, Apr. 18, 2024]
### §103. Assent to purchase of lands for forts

The President of the United States is authorized to procure the assent of the legislature of any State, within which any purchase of land has been made for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings, without such consent having been obtained.

(July 30, 1947, ch. 389, 61 Stat. 644.)
9 étapes pour réduire l'exposition des travailleurs au 

COVID-19 dans les installations de transformation et 

d'emballage de viande, de volaille et de porc

Gardez vous et les personnes qui travaillent autour de vous en sécurité. Suivez 

ces étapes même si vous ne présentez aucun symptôme de COVID-19.

OSHA 4052-07 2020 — 9 Steps to Reducing Worker Exposure to COVID-19 in Meat, Poultry, and Pork Processing and Packaging Facilities (French)

Restez à la maison si 

vous êtes malade.

➊

Porter un équipement de 

protection pour la sécurité 

générale et pour limiter 

la propagation du virus.

➐

Évitez les réunions 

de groupe pendant 

les pauses, même à 

l'extérieur.

➌ Installez des cloisons 

le long de la ligne de 

production pour obtenir 

une distance physique.

➍

➎ Évitez de partager l'équipement 

et les outils. Nettoyez 

régulièrement les outils et 

l'équipement qui doivent 

être partagés.

Signalez tout problème 

de sécurité et de santé 

à votre superviseur ou à 

l'OSHA.

➑

➏ Utilisez du savon et de 

l'eau pour vous laver 

les mains.

➋ Maintenez une distance 

d’au moins six pieds entre 

vous et vos collègues.

1-800-321-OSHA (6742)

TTY 1-877-889-5627

www.osha.gov

Administration de 

la sécurité et de la 

santé au travail

Évitez le covoiturage pour 

aller au travail et en revenir, 

si possible.

➒ Restez à jour sur les 

recommandations de santé 

publique. Pour plus d'informations, 

visitez www.osha.gov/coronavirus ou 

appelez le 1-800-321-OSHA (6742).
(No. 88-CC-2461

#### BroMenn Healthcare d/b/a Brokaw Hospital, Claimant, *v.*The State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed August 5, 1993.*

Markowitz & Lawrence (William B. Lawrence, of counsel), for Claimant.

Roland W. Burris, Attorney General (Christine Zeman, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

ORDER

Sommer, J.

This cause coming to be heard on the motion to dismiss filed by the Respondent and the motion of this *261Court, due notice having been given, and this Court being fully advised, finds:

(1) That this Court is engaged in a program of clearing its dockets of cases in which no action has occurred for some years.

(2) That this claim involves a written contract between the Department of Mental Health and the Claimant to provide professional services.

(3) That this claim is for funds over and above the amount of the contract.

(4) That this Court cannot order payment of claims for professional services in excess of the written contract amount. *Brokaw Hospital v. State*(1979), 32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 810.

(5) That the Court finds it was a pre-existing practice to allow the contract amount to be over-run; and the payment of the over-run would be stipulated thereto by the Department and Attorney General.

(6) That in this claim and others in 1986, the Department and Attorney General suddenly refused to stipulate to the over-run.

(7) That this Court may not grant a judgment in *quantum meruit.*

(8) That the same subject matter and claim was briefed and decided in the claim of *Franciscan Sisters d/b/a St. Elizabeth’s Hospital v. State*(1987), 86-CC-155.

(9) That this Court ruled in *Franciscan Sisters, supra,*that the claim for over-runs must be dismissed.

(10) That this Court must dismiss the present claim.

(11) That, however, the Claimant may wish to present this claim to the General Assembly due to the fact *262that the pre-existing practice was suddenly changed by the Department and Attorney General.

(12) That for the purposes of presentation to the General Assembly, this Court finds that services were billed in the amount of $158,193.48 by the Claimant, and the amount was not contested by the Department, and could have been paid for but for exceeding the contract limit, which could have been amended. Additionally, according to the departmental report, sufficient funds did lapse from F.Y. 85 appropriation number 050-46220-4467-1500.

It is therefore ordered that this claim is dismissed.
# C_2023275EN.01001501.xml

| 4.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 275/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 275/15

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11181 – MACQUARIE / BCI / ENDEAVOUR ENERGY)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 275/04)

On 26 July 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11181. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11181. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### § 401.3 Definitions.

*Act* means the Water Resources Research Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-242, 98 Stat. 97).

*Fiscal year* means a 12-month period ending on September 30.

*Director* means the Director of the USGS or a designee.

*Grant* means the funds made available to an institute in a particular fiscal year pursuant to section 104 of the Act and the regulations in this chapter.

*Grantee* means the college or university at which an institute is established.

*Granting agency* means the USGS.

*Institute* means a water resources research institute, center, or equivalent agency established in accordance with Title I of the Act.

*Region* means any grouping of two or more institutes mutually chosen by themselves to reflect a commonality of water-resources problems.

*Scientists* means individuals engaged in any professional discipline, including the life, physical or social sciences, and engineers.

*Secretary* means the Secretary of the Interior or a designee.

*State* means each of the 50 States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, the District of Columbia, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Mariana Islands, and the Federated States of Micronesia.

[50 FR 23114, May 31, 1985, as amended at 58 FR 27204, May 7, 1993]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Tradequest International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the nine months ending September 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Luis Alvarez, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Luis Alvarez
                                        ----------------
December 16, 2005                       Luis Alvarez, CEO,
                                        principal executive officer
                                        and principal accounting officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 7.302 Definitions.

The following definitions apply in this subpart:

*Afterburning.* The combustion of any flammable mixture that is drawn into an enclosure after an internal explosion in the enclosure. This condition is determined through detection of secondary pressure peaks occurring subsequent to the initial explosion.

*Cylindrical joint.* A joint comprised of two contiguous, concentric, cylindrical surfaces.

*Explosion-proof enclosure.* A metallic enclosure used as a winding compartment, conduit box, or a combination of both that complies with the applicable requirements of § 7.304 of this part and is constructed so that it will withstand the explosion tests of § 7.306 of this part.

*Fastening.* A bolt, screw, or stud used to secure adjoining parts to prevent the escape of flame from an explosion-proof enclosure.

*Flame-arresting path.* Two or more adjoining or adjacent surfaces between which the escape of flame is prevented.

*Internal free volume (of an empty enclosure).* The volume remaining after deducting the volume of any part that is essential in maintaining the explosion-proof integrity of the enclosure or necessary for operation of the motor. Essential parts include the parts that constitute the flame-arresting path and those necessary to secure parts that constitute a flame-arresting path.

*Motor assembly.* The winding compartment including a conduit box when specified. A motor assembly is comprised of one or more explosion-proof enclosures.

*Plane joint.* A joint comprised of two adjoining surfaces in parallel planes.

*Step (rabbet) joint.* A joint comprised of two adjoining surfaces with a change or changes in direction between its inner and outer edges. A step joint may be composed of a cylindrical portion and a plane portion or of two or more plane portions.

*Stuffing box.* An entrance with a recess filled with packing material for cables extending through a wall of an explosion-proof enclosure.

*Threaded joint.* A joint consisting of a male- and a female-threaded member, both of which are the same type and gauge.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Devcon International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Robert C. Farenhem, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                             
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: November 21, 2005 |  | /s/ Robert C. Farenhem                      
|                        |  | Robert C. Farenhem                          
|                        |  | Interim Chief Financial Officer             
|                        |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



Note: This certification is being
furnished, not filed, as exhibit 32.2
58 P.3d 507

#### Leonard MOSCHCAU et al v. MOHAVE COUNTY/NELSON

No. CV-02-0270-PR.

Supreme Court of Arizona.

Dec. 4, 2002.

The following action was taken by the Supreme Court of the State of Arizona on December 3, 2002, in regard to the above-referenced cause:

ORDERED: Petition for Review = DENIED.

FURTHER ORDERED: The Court of Appeals’ Opinion shall not be published, pursuant to Rule 111(g), Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court.

Justice FELDMAN did not participate in the determination of this matter.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of William Bruno, Deceased. Frank Bruno et al., Appellants; Lawrence Braunstein, as Special Guardian for Rosemary Bruno, an Infant, Respondent.

In a contested probate proceeding, the proponent and certain residuary legatees appeal from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County, entered May 21, 1962 after a jury trial upon framed issues, as (1) denied probate to the propounded instrument upon the ground that the decedent lacked testamentary capacity; and (2) fixed $3,000 as and for the compensation of Lawrence Braunstein, special guardian for Rosemary Bruno, the infant contestant. Decree modified upon the facts by reducing the special guardian’s fee to $2,000. As so modified, decree, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs to all parties filing briefs, payable out of the estate. In our opinion, taking into consideration: (a) the services rendered by the said special guardian for the infant contestant Rosemary Bruno; (b) the gross amount of the estate; and (c) the other fees and expenses still to be paid therefrom, the allowance of $3,000 to him was excessive. Under all the circumstances it should be reduced to $2,000. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.