alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENTS:

85 FR 80875, December 14, 2020.

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETINGS:

 Wednesday, December 16, 2020 at 10:00 a.m.

# CHANGES IN THE MEETING:

The following item will not be considered during the Open Meeting on Wednesday, December 16, 2020:

2. The Commission will consider whether to adopt amendments under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act”) to update rules that govern investment adviser marketing to accommodate the continual evolution and interplay of technology and advice, while preserving investor protections. The Commission will also consider whether to adopt amendments to Form ADV to provide the Commission with additional information about advisers' marketing practices, and corresponding amendments to the books and records rule under the Advisers Act.

In addition, the following previously scheduled matter will be considered on December 21, 2020, during the Open Meeting:

3. The Commission will consider whether to approve a proposed rule change by New York Stock Exchange LLC to amend Chapter One of the Listed Company Manual to modify the provisions relating to direct listings.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: December 14, 2020.

Vanessa A. Countryman,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2020-27867 Filed 12-15-20; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1996
<CASH>                                      25,408,030
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               26,295,248
<ALLOWANCES>                                   695,545
<INVENTORY>                                 14,880,759
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            69,372,917
<PP&E>                                      31,874,578
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,428,226
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              96,538,539
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,664,573
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,564
<OTHER-SE>                                  75,151,328
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                96,538,578
<SALES>                                     25,559,501
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,559,501
<CGS>                                        9,148,742
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,148,742
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                50,482
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,983,851
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,004,590
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,979,261
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,979,261
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3439 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3439

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
201 North 3rd Street in Smithfield, North Carolina, as the ``Ava Gardner 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 201 
North 3rd Street in Smithfield, North Carolina, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Ava Gardner Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ava Gardner Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
### §50102. Restricting contract awards because of discrimination against United States goods or services

A person or enterprise domiciled or operating under the laws of a foreign country may not make a contract or subcontract under section 106(k), 44502(a)(2), or 44509, subchapter I of chapter 471, or chapter 481 (except sections 48102(e), 48106, 48107, and 48110) of this title or subtitle B of title IX of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (Public Law 101–508, 104 Stat. 1388–353) if the government of that country unfairly maintains, in government procurement, a significant and persistent pattern of discrimination against United States goods or services that results in identifiable harm to United States businesses, that the President identifies under section 305(g)(1)(A) of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (19 U.S.C. 2515(g)(1)(A)).

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1298, §49102; renumbered §50102 and amended Pub. L. 104–287, §5(88)(D), (89), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3398; Pub. L. 118–63, title VII, §768(b)(1), May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1294.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 49102 | 49 App.:2226c. | Nov. 5, 1990, Pub. L. 101–508, §9131, 104 Stat. 1388–372; Oct. 31, 1992, Pub. L. 102–581, §118(b), 106 Stat. 4883. |

Section

The words "government of that country" are substituted for "that government" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.

#### Pub. L. 104–287, §5(89)

This makes a clarifying amendment to 49:50101(a) and (b)(3), 50102, 50104(b)(1), and 50105, as redesignated by clause (88)(D) of this section, because 49:47106(d) was struck by section 108(1) of the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (Public Law 103–305, 108 Stat. 1573).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Subtitle B of title IX of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, referred to in text, is subtitle B (§§9101–9131) of title IX of Pub. L. 101–508, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–353, known as the Aviation Safety and Capacity Expansion Act of 1990. Sections 9102 to 9105, 9107 to 9112(b), 9113 to 9115, 9118, 9121 to 9123, 9124 "Sec. 613(c)", 9125, 9127, and 9129 to 9131 of title IX of Pub. L. 101–508 were repealed by Pub. L. 103–272, §7(b), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1379, the first section of which enacted subtitles II, III, and V to X of Title 49, Transportation. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. For disposition of sections of former Title 49, see table at the beginning of Title 49.

#### Amendments

2024—Pub. L. 118–63 struck out "(except section 47127)" after "subchapter I of chapter 471".

1996—Pub. L. 104–287, §5(89), substituted "section 47127" for "sections 47106(d) and 47127".

Pub. L. 104–287, §5(88)(D), renumbered section 49102 of this title as this section.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Veritas DGC
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended October 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I,
Matthew D. Fitzgerald, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

               1.   The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
                    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
                    1934; and

               2.   The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
                    in all material respects, the financial condition and
                    results of operations of the Company.

June 13, 2003
                                              /s/ Matthew D. Fitzgerald
                                              -------------------------
                                              Matthew D. Fitzgerald
                                              Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
99.3   From: Costabile, Tom
 To:
'michael.boldt@icemiller.com'
 Cc: Klinger, Mike
 Sent:
 Subject: Re: Follow up Re:
4.2(d)
  Mike,
  Thanks
again. I have no additional comments. Subject to Mike's concurrence, please
finalize.
  Thanks
& regards,
  Tommy
   From: Boldt, Michael
 To: Costabile, Tom
 Cc: Klinger, Mike
 Sent: Thu Oct 02 16:20:37
2008
 Subject: Follow up Re:
4.2(d)
  Tom,
  I spoke to Jim. The language "on a
reasonably similar basis, as determined by EDC in it sole discretion" in 4.2(d)
is optional. It can be deleted if you want to do so.
  Mike
  ********************************************************************
  CIRCULAR
230 DISCLOSURE: Except to the extent that this advice concerns the qualification
of any qualified plan, to ensure compliance with U.S. Treasury Department
Regulations, we are now required to advise you that, unless otherwise expressly
indicated, any federal tax advice contained in this communication, including any
attachments, is not intended or written by us to be used, and cannot be used, by
anyone for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties that may be imposed by
the federal government or for promoting, marketing or recommending to another
party any tax-related matters addressed herein.
  CONFIDENTIALITY
NOTICE:
  This
E-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be protected by legal
privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure,
copying, distribution, or use of this E-mail or any attachment is prohibited. If
you have received this E-mail in error, please notify us immediately by
returning it to the sender and delete this copy from your system. Thank
you.
  ICE
MILLER LLP
EXHIBIT 32.2

WRITTEN STATEMENT

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with Quarterly Report of Comtech Group, Inc. and its
subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Frank Zheng Chief Financial Officer of
the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |        |  |                        
|------------------ |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: May 9, 2008 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Frank Zheng        
|                   |  | Name:  |  | Frank Zheng            
|                   |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer



30
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

            Pursuant  to  section  906  of  the   Sarbanes-Oxley   Act  of  2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code),  each of the  undersigned  officers of Brilliant  Digital  Entertainment,
Inc., a Delaware  corporation (the "Company"),  does hereby certify with respect
to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June
30, 2003,  as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  (the "10-QSB
Report") that:

(1)      the 10-QSB Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the information  contained in the 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.





Date:  August 19, 2003                             /S/ KEVIN BERMEISTER
                                                   --------------------------
                                                      Kevin Bermeister
                                                      President and
                                                      Chief Executive Officer






Date:  August 19, 2003                             /S/ TYLER TARR
                                                   --------------------------
                                                      Tyler Tarr,
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SATPAL SINGH

,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney

General,

Respondent. No. 1 9

- 70250

Agency No. A215

- 906

- 902

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 28, 2021 **

Pasadena

, California

Before: M

. SMITH and OWENS , Circuit Judges, and ROBRENO, * * * District

Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)

decision dismissing the appeal of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision for lack

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for

decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

* * * The Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno, United States District Judge for

the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

AUG 2 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

of jurisdiction. Petitioner appealed the IJ’s denial of his motion to reopen his

credible fear determination . We dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.

“We determine our own jurisdiction de novo .” Pena v. Lynch , 815 F.3d 452,

455 (9th Cir. 2016) (citing Bolanos v. Holder

, 734 F.3d 875, 876 (9th Cir. 2013)).

This court held in Singh v. Barr that it lacks jurisdiction over petitions seeking

review of an IJ ’s denial of a motion to reopen credible fear proceedings. 982 F.3d

7 78

, 7 84 (9th Cir. 2020) (“Read together, [8 U.S.C. ] §§ 1252(a)(2)(A), (D) and

1252(e) provide clear and convincing evidence that Congress intended to deprive

circuit courts of appeals of jurisdiction to review expedited removal orders and

related matters affecting those orders, including underlying negative credible fear

determi nations . . . .”). Accordingly, the review Petitioner seeks is outside of our

jurisdiction.

PETITION FOR REVIEW D ISMISSED

.
**Exhibit 99**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

 

Pursuant to subsections (a) and (b) of Section1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers ofCredit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterended September 30, 2002 of the Company fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company forsuch quarterly period presented.

 
| November  14, 2002 |                 |
|--------------------|----------------------|
|               | /s/  John J. Mack    |   |
|               | Name:                | John  J. Mack |
|               | Title:               | Chief  Executive Officer |
|               |                 |
| November  14, 2002 |                 |
|               | /s/  David C. Fisher |   |
|               | Name:                | David  C. Fisher |
|               | Title:               | Chief  Financial and Accounting Officer |
|                    |                      |  |  |

 

----
### §1810. Civil liability

An aggrieved person, other than a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power, as defined in section 1801(a) or (b)(1)(A) of this title, respectively, who has been subjected to an electronic surveillance or about whom information obtained by electronic surveillance of such person has been disclosed or used in violation of section 1809 of this title shall have a cause of action against any person who committed such violation and shall be entitled to recover—

(a) actual damages, but not less than liquidated damages equal to the greater of—

(1) if the aggrieved person is a United States person, $10,000 or $1,000 per day for each day of violation; or

(2) for any other aggrieved person, $1,000 or $100 per day for each day of violation;

(b) punitive damages; and

(c) reasonable attorney's fees and other investigation and litigation costs reasonably incurred.

(Pub. L. 95–511, title I, §110, Oct. 25, 1978, 92 Stat. 1796; Pub. L. 118–49, §15(a), Apr. 20, 2024, 138 Stat. 882.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2024—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 118–49 amended subsec. (a) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (a) read as follows: "actual damages, but not less than liquidated damages of $1,000 or $100 per day for each day of violation, whichever is greater;".
§ 550.266 After receiving the DPP or DOCD, what will BOEM do? ( a ) *Determine whether deemed submitted.* Within 25 working days after receiving your proposed DPP or DOCD and its accompanying information, the Regional Supervisor will deem your DPP or DOCD submitted if: ( 1 ) The submitted information, including the information that must accompany the DPP or DOCD (refer to the list in § 550.242), fulfills requirements and is sufficiently accurate;
( 2 ) You have provided all needed additional information (see § 550.201(b)); and
( 3 ) You have provided the required number of copies (see § 550.206(a)).
( b ) *Identify problems and deficiencies.* If the Regional Supervisor determines that you have not met one or more of the conditions in paragraph (a) of this section, the Regional Supervisor will notify you of the problem or deficiency within 25 working days after the Regional Supervisor receives your DPP or DOCD and its accompanying information. The Regional Supervisor will not deem your DPP or DOCD submitted until you have corrected all problems or deficiencies identified in the notice.
( c ) *Deemed submitted notification.* The Regional Supervisor will notify you when your DPP or DOCD is deemed submitted.
#### § 285.811 Am I required to obtain a certification of my SMS?

You are not required to obtain a certification that your SMS meets acceptable health and safety standards (*e.g.,* ANSI/ASSP Z10.0, API RP 75, ISO 45001) from a recognized accreditation organization. However, BSEE will consider such certification in determining the frequency and scope of SMS-related inspections that it conducts under this subpart, as well as the scope and nature of its oversight over any audit-induced corrective actions.

[89 FR 42720, May 15, 2024]
#### REYNOLDS v. EXTRIX.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 24, 1905.)

Action by Thomas L. Reynolds against Ruth Britton Extrix. No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs.
#### HENTZ, Appellant, v. HAVEMEYER et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 27, 1905.)

Action by Henry Hentz against Henry O. Havemeyer and Charles H. Senff. No opinion. Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs.