alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

Exhibit 12.1

                       DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE, INC.
         STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             AND PREFERRED DIVIDENDS
                        (In thousands, except for ratio)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                                       For the Nine
                                                                  For the Years Ended                                  Months Ended
                                                 1994           1995          1996            1997           1998          9/99
                                              ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------    ----------
<S>                                           <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Earnings:
     Income before provision for
       income taxes                           $  205,000     $  298,500     $  473,800     $  661,100     $  600,500    $  650,000

Add: Fixed Charges
       Interest(gross)                         2,116,655      2,699,769      2,865,800      4,012,209      4,501,242     3,397,296

       Interest factor in rents                   18,565         22,064         25,515         29,351         38,517        37,383
                                              ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------    ----------

       Total fixed charges                     2,135,220      2,721,833      2,891,315      4,041,560      4,539,759     3,434,679

Add: Preferred dividends                          20,970         19,868         18,653         12,144         21,310        15,867

     Combined fixed charges and preferred
       dividends                               2,156,190      2,741,701      2,909,968      4,053,704      4,561,069     3,450,546

Earnings before fixed charges
 and  provision for income taxes              $2,340,220     $3,020,333     $3,365,115     $4,702,660     $5,140,259    $4,084,679
                                              ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========    ==========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    and preferred dividends                         1.09           1.10           1.16           1.16           1.13          1.18
                                              ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========    ==========
</TABLE>
§ 57.5071 Exposure monitoring. ( a ) Mine operators must monitor as often as necessary to effectively determine, under conditions that can be reasonably anticipated in the mine, whether the average personal full-shift airborne exposure to DPM exceeds the DPM limit specified in § 57.5060.
( b ) The mine operator must provide affected miners and their representatives with an opportunity to observe exposure monitoring required by this section. Mine operators must give prior notice to affected miners and their representatives of the date and time of intended monitoring.
( c ) If any monitoring performed under this section indicates that a miner's exposure to diesel particulate matter exceeds the DPM limit specified in § 57.5060, the operator must promptly post notice of the corrective action being taken on the mine bulletin board, initiate corrective action by the next work shift, and promptly complete such corrective action.
( d ) ( 1 ) The results of monitoring for diesel particulate matter, including any results received by a mine operator from sampling performed by the Secretary, must be posted on the mine bulletin board within 15 days of receipt and must remain posted for 30 days. The operator must provide a copy of the results to the authorized representative of miners.
( 2 ) The mine operator must retain for five years (from the date of sampling), the results of any samples the operator collected as a result of monitoring under this section, and information about the sampling method used for obtaining the samples.
[70 FR 32966, June 6, 2005]
§ 882.413 Responsibility of the Family. ( a ) A family receiving housing assistance under this Program must fulfill all of its obligations under the Lease and Statement of Family Responsibility.
( b ) No family member may engage in drug-related criminal activity or violent criminal activity. Failure of the Family to meet its responsibilities under the Lease, the Statement of Family Responsibility, or this section shall constitute rounds for termination of assistance by the PHA. Should the PHA determine to terminate assistance to the Family, the provisions of § 882.514(f) must be followed.
[55 FR 28546, July 11, 1990, as amended at 63 FR 23855, Apr. 30, 1998]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,377,359
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   94,178
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,116
<INVENTORY>                                     23,390 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,662,606
<PP&E>                                       1,033,662
<DEPRECIATION>                                 534,924
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,255,123
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          684,900
<BONDS>                                        176,592
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    11,504,273
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,156,142)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,255,123
<SALES>                                        128,241
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               128,241
<CGS>                                          126,387
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  563,031
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,525
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (532,214)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (532,214)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (532,214)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.1 Scope.

This part 75 sets forth safety standards compliance with which is mandatory in each underground coal mine subject to the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977. Some standards also are applicable to surface operations. Regulations and criteria supplementary to these standards also are set forth in this part.

[35 FR 17890, Nov. 20, 1970, as amended at 43 FR 12319, Mar. 24, 1978]
§ 72.503 Determination of emissions; filter maintenance; definition of “introduced”. ( a ) MSHA will determine compliance with the emission requirements established by this part by using the amount of diesel particulate matter emitted by a particular engine determined from the engine approval pursuant to § 7.89(a)(9)(iii)(B) or § 7.89(a)(9)(iv)(A) of this title, with the exception of engines deemed to be in compliance by meeting the EPA requirements specified in Table 72.502-1 (§ 72.502(b)).
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, the amount by which an aftertreatment device can reduce engine emissions of diesel particulate matter as determined pursuant to paragraph (a) must be established by a laboratory test: ( 1 ) on an approved engine which MSHA has determined, pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, to emit no more diesel particulate matter than the engine being used in the piece of diesel-powered equipment in question;
( 2 ) using the test cycle specified in Table E-3 of § 7.89 of this title, and following a test procedure appropriate for the filtration system, by a laboratory capable of testing engines in accordance with the requirements of Subpart E of part 7 of this title; and
( 3 ) with an aftertreatment device representative of that being used on the piece of diesel-powered equipment in question.
( c ) In lieu of the laboratory tests required by paragraph (b), the Secretary may accept the results of tests conducted or certified by an organization whose testing standards are deemed by the Secretary to be as rigorous as those set forth by paragraph (b) of this section; and further, the Secretary may accept the results of tests for one aftertreatment device as evidencing the efficiency of another aftertreatment device which the Secretary determines to be essentially identical to the one tested.
( d ) Operators must maintain in accordance with manufacturer specifications and free of observable defects, any aftertreatment device installed on a piece of diesel equipment upon which the operator relies to remove diesel particulate matter from diesel emissions.
( e ) For purposes of §§ 72.500(a), 72.501(a) and 72.502(a), the term “introduced” means any piece of equipment whose engine is a new addition to the underground inventory of engines of the mine in question, including newly purchased equipment, used equipment, and equipment receiving a replacement engine that has a different serial number than the engine it is replacing. “Introduced” does not include a piece of equipment whose engine was previously part of the mine inventory and rebuilt.
### §3074. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary and appropriate to carry out the provisions and purposes of this chapter (other than the provisions and purposes of sections 3023, 3025, 3035, 3038 of this title and subchapters III, IV, and V).

(July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title III, §307, 61 Stat. 509; Pub. L. 103–178, title III, §309, Dec. 3, 1993, 107 Stat. 2036.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, 61 Stat. 495, known as the National Security Act of 1947, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 411 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section, and to section 171m of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.

#### Amendments

1993—Pub. L. 103–178 inserted exception relating to sections 3023, 3025, 3035, and 3038 of this title and subchapters III, IV, and V.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 11, 2009 

0831 

Order 

 

September 11, 2009 

138690 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138690 

 COA: 289907 

Wayne CC: 07-015368 

COREY MELVIN LONG, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 20, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# C_2023206EN.01000101.xml

| 13.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11057 – DEKABANK / SC / LBBW / SWIAT JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 206/01)

On 8 June 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11057. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11057. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-0056

_____________________________

EDWARD F. BENSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Roberto A. Arias, Judge.

September 28, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, LEWIS, and RAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Victor Holder, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Virginia Harris, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
§ 585.101 What is the purpose of this part? The purpose of this part is to: ( a ) Establish procedures for issuance and administration of leases, right-of-way (ROW) grants, and right-of-use and easement (RUE) grants for renewable energy production on the OCS;
( b ) Inform you and third parties of your obligations when you undertake activities authorized in this part; and
( c ) Ensure that renewable energy activities on the OCS are conducted in a safe and environmentally sound manner, in conformance with the requirements of subsection 8(p) of the OCS Lands Act, other applicable laws and regulations, and the terms of your lease, ROW grant, or RUE grant.
( d ) This part will not convey access rights for oil, gas, or other minerals.
§ 735.16 Special provisions for States with cooperative agreements. ( a ) *Eligibility.* The Director may approve additional grants to States which have cooperative agreements pursuant to § 211.75 of this title for State regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on Federal lands. This includes— ( 1 ) States which had cooperative agreements on August 3, 1977, which have been modified to comply with the initial regulatory program; and
( 2 ) States which enter into cooperative agreements following approval of the State's regulatory program.
( b ) *Coverage of grants.* An agency may use cooperative agreement grants to carry out the functions assigned to the State under the agreement.
( c ) *Amounts of grants.* The Director or his authorized designee may approve grants for the approximate amount which he determines the Federal Government would have expended for regulation of coal mining on the Federal lands being regulated by the State, except that no grant may exceed the actual costs to the State.
( d ) *Grant periods.* The Director or his authorized designee shall normally approve a grant for a period of one year or less. Consecutive grants shall be awarded to fund approved programs.
( e ) *Application procedures.* ( 1 ) States with cooperative agreements in effect on August 3, 1977, may apply for cooperative agreement grants using the procedures set forth in § 735.18 (a), (b) and (d).
( 2 ) States with cooperative agreements established in conjunction with approved State regulatory programs may apply for cooperative agreement grants by including a supplement to an annual administration and enforcement grant application submitted according to § 735.18. The State shall include in the supplemental section: ( i ) A separate budget summary for the costs of the cooperative agreement in the format specified by OSM; and
( ii ) A separate narrative, in the format specified by OSM, describing the specific activities required by the cooperative agreement for the period for which the grant is requested.
( f ) *Other requirements.* The procedures and requirements set forth in §§ 735.17 through 735.26 are applicable to cooperative agreement grants.
[42 FR 62706, Dec. 13, 1977; 43 FR 2722, Jan. 19, 1977. Redesignated at 44 FR 15312, Mar. 13, 1979, and amended at 47 FR 38491, Aug. 31, 1982]
§ 550.136 How will BOEM determine if my performance is unacceptable? In determining if your operating performance is unacceptable, BOEM will consider, individually or collectively: ( a ) - ( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) Incidents of noncompliance;
( d ) Civil penalties;
( e ) Failure to adhere to OCS lease obligations; or
( f ) Any other relevant factors.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 23
 
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
 
 
     Securities and Exchange Commission
     Washington, D. C.
 
     We hereby consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
     our report dated January 15, 1998, on our audit of the consolidated
     financial statements of Citizens Financial Corp. as of December 31, 1997
     and 1996, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
     1997, appearing in Part II, Item 8 of the 1997 Form 10-K of Citizens
     Financial Corp.
 
                                         ARNETT & FOSTER, P.L.L.C.
 
 

     Charleston, West Virginia
     March 24, 1998
1

The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable

Bobby E. Shepherd, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of

Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-4112

___________

James Kenneth Anderson, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Western

* District of Arkansas.

Judy C. Langley, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: April 14, 2003

 Filed: May 12, 2003

___________

Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, BYE, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate James Kenneth Anderson appeals the district court’s1

preservice dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).

We grant Anderson’s motion to appeal in forma pauperis, and we leave to the district

court the details of calculating the initial partial appellate filing fee, and the collection
-2-

of the balance of the appellate filing fee in installments. See Henderson v. Norris,

129 F.3d 481, 484-85 (8th Cir. 1997) (per curiam). 

Having carefully reviewed the record, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171

(8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (de novo standard of review), we summarily affirm the

dismissal of the action. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

August 2, 2021

No. 04

- 20

- 00151

- CV

John PORTERFIELD, Appellant

v.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Appellee

From the 451st Judici al District Court

, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18

- 366 Honorable Kirsten Cohoon , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellee’s motion for rehearing was originally due on July 29, 2021, and appellee filed

an unopposed motion requesting a thirty

- day extension of that deadline. After consideration, we GRANT the motion and ORDER appellee to file its motion for rehearing by August 27, 2021

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.8.

_______________________________ __ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 2nd day of August, 2021

.

_________________________________ __ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. CROWN DRUG COMPANY.

No. 15022.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

March 18, 1954.

David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, and A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

Order of National Labor Relations Board enforced, on petition for enforcement and stipulation filed with Board.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           49335
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   135406
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                184741
<PP&E>                                         9360370
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2107769
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8325541
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           160718
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8315541
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1340741
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1073058
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              744438
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (394110)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (394110)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>