alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6600

AINSWORTH C. JACKSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-04-3081-AW)

Submitted: September 22, 2006 Decided: October 2, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ainsworth C. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer A. Wright,

Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Ainsworth C. Jackson, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Jackson’s motion for a copy

of the appellate record, and we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Jackson v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, No. CA-04-

3081-AW (D. Md. filed & entered Mar. 29, 2005). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dionics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of the undersigneds knowledge, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|Dated:  November 13, 2009 | By:   /s/ Bernard L. Kravitz         
|------------------------- | -------------------------------------
|                          | Bernard L. Kravitz,                  
|                          | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                          | (Principal Executive Officer)        
|                          |                                      
|                          |                                      
|Dated:  November 13, 2009 | By:   /s/ Bernard L. Kravitz         
|                          | Bernard L. Kravitz,                  
|                          | Principal Financial Officer          

































1
EXHIBIT 32.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
               TO RULE 13a-14(b)
______________________________________________________________________________


In connection with the Annual Report of Gallery of History, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Rod Lynam, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Rod Lynam
________________
Rod Lynam
Chief Financial Officer

December 22, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         889,982
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,704,990
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (100,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 24,243,171
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            42,994,625
<PP&E>                                      23,845,091
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,852,548
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              61,747,684
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,742,457
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,561,175
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,361,705
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                61,747,684
<SALES>                                     26,441,837
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,496,107
<CGS>                                       17,366,386
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,578,194
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,211,808
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             464,645
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,453,268
<INCOME-TAX>                                   379,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  1,04,268
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
        

</TABLE>
#### (A) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph De Grandis, Frank De Forte and Ernest Zundel, Appellants. (B) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Vincent Ruberto, Appellant.

Motion by appellant [s] to further enlarge his time to perfect appeal [s], granted; time enlarged to the March Term, beginning February 27, 1961; appeal [s] ordered on the calendar for said term. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofSEDONA Corporation (“SEDONA”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Anita M. Primo, Vice President and Chief Financial Officerof SEDONA Corporation certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of SEDONA Corporation.

 

 
| Dated: April 15, 2010 | /s/ ANITA M. PRIMO                            |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                  | Anita M. Primo                                |
|                  | *Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer* |
|                  | *(Principal Financial Officer)*               |

 

----
Exhibit 10.260


                                 PROMISSORY NOTE
                                  (NO INTEREST)

$12,856.00                                                  Glendale, California
   June 29, 2000




     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Ilija Sakota (Payor") promises to pay in lawful money
of the United States of America to Pollution Research and Control Corp., a
California corporation ("Payee"), or order, at Glendale, California, the sum of
$12,856.00 Dollars from the date hereof on the unpaid principal payable in
installments of principal only in the sum of $50.00 Dollars commencing on July
15, 2000 and payable on the same day of each month thereafter until paid in
full.

     The unpaid principal may be prepaid without penalty. Each payment hereunder
shall be credited to the principal amount.

     If each installment under this note is not paid when due, the undersigned
shall pay all costs of collection thereof, including reasonable attorneys' fees,
whether or not suit or action is commenced to enforce payment of this note, and
Payee may, at its option, declare the entire amount of the then unpaid principal
immediately due and payable if such default is not cured within 10 days after
Payee provides the undersigned written notice of such default. The undersigned
hereby waives presentment, notice of dishonor and protest.

     This note is secured by shares of Payee's common stock, no par value (the
"Shares"), pursuant to a certain Stock Pledge Agreement, dated as of June 29,
2000 (the "Pledge Agreement").

     Upon the termination of employment of Payor as an employee of Payee for any
reason, the unpaid balance of this note shall be cancelled, and the pro rata
portion of Shares which then not fully paid for, shall be returned to Payee
pursuant to the terms of the Pledge Agreement.

                                            Payor:



                                            By:  /s/  Ilija Sakota
                                               --------------------------------
                                                      Ilija Sakota
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Margaret Patterson, Respondent, v. James Vreeland et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board awarding death benefits. The appellants contend there is no substantial evidence to support the finding that death in 1958 was causally related to the injury in 1953. The decedent sustained a compensable heart accident in 1953 which contributed to his fatal heart accident in 1958. During this period when the decedent was disabled, he was paid full compensation and periodic medical reports were filed, all of which related the finding of permanent condition to the original accident. There was conflicting medical testimony as to whether *723his death was causally related to the 1953 accident and the board made a factual finding of such relationship which is supported by substantial evidence. Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
### §3237a. Repealed. Pub. L. 117–263, div. F, title LXVIII, §6811(a), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3600

Section, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title XI, §1107A, as added Pub. L. 116–260, div. W, title VI, §611(b), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2393, related to annual reports on security services of the People's Republic of China in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
§ 27.21 Methane-monitoring system. ( a ) A methane-monitoring system shall be so designed that any machine or equipment, which is controlled by the system, cannot be operated unless the electrical components of the methane-monitoring system are functioning normally.
( b ) A methane-monitoring system shall be rugged in construction so that its operation will not be affected by vibration or physical shock, such as normally encountered in mining operations.
( c ) Insulating materials that give off flammable or explosive gases when decomposed shall not be used within enclosures where they might be subjected to destructive electrical action.
( d ) An enclosure shall be equipped with a lock, seal, or acceptable equivalent when MSHA deems such protection necessary for safety.
( e ) A component or subassembly of a methane-monitoring system shall be constructed as a package unit or otherwise in a manner acceptable to MSHA. Such components or subassemblies shall be readily replaceable or removable without creating an ignition hazard.
( f ) The complete system shall “fail safe” in a manner acceptable to MSHA.
### §§646 to 663. Repealed. Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §53, 70A Stat. 641

Section 646, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 127, related to errors of law and to lesser included offense. See section 859 of Title 10, Armed Forces.

Section 647, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 127, provided for initial action on record. See section 860 of Title 10.

Section 648, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 127, provided for initial action on general court-martial records. See section 861 of Title 10.

Section 649, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 127, provided for reconsideration and revision. See section 862 of Title 10.

Section 650, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 127, related to rehearings. See section 863 of Title 10.

Section 651, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 128, related to approval by convening authority. See section 864 of Title 10.

Section 652, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 128, provided for disposition of records after review by convening authority. See section 865 of Title 10.

Section 653, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 128, provided for review by board of review. See section 866 of Title 10.

Section 654, acts May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 130; Mar. 2, 1955, ch. 9, §1(i), 69 Stat. 10, provided for review by the Court of Military Appeals. See section 867 of Title 10.

Section 655, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 130, authorized establishment of branch offices of The Judge Advocate General. See section 868 of Title 10.

Section 656, act May 30, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 130, provided for review in office of The Judge Advocate General. See section 869 of Title 10.

Section 657, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 130, provided for appellate counsel. See section 870 of Title 10.

Section 658, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 131, provided for execution of sentence and suspension of sentence. See section 871 of Title 10.

Section 659, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 131, related to vacation of suspension of a court-martial sentence. See section 872 of Title 10.

Section 660, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 132, provided for a petition for a new trial. See section 873 of Title 10.

Section 661, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 132, authorized remission and suspension of sentences. See section 874 of Title 10.

Section 662, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 132, related to restoration of rights, privileges, and property. See section 875 of Title 10.

Section 663, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 132, related to finality of court-martial judgments. See section 876 of Title 10.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Jan. 1, 1957, see act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §53 footnote, 70A Stat. 680.
### §402. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 402, comprising section 101 of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as section 3021 of this title.

The National Security Agency Act of 1959, Pub. L. 86–36, formerly set out as a note under section 402, was editorially reclassified as chapter 47 of this title.
§ 57.6602 Static electricity dissipation during loading. When explosive material is loaded pneumatically into a blasthole in a manner that generates a static electricity hazard— ( a ) An evaluation of the potential static electricity hazard shall be made and any hazard shall be eliminated before loading begins;
( b ) The loading hose shall be of a semiconductive type, have a total of not more than 2 megohms of resistance over its entire length and not less than 1000 ohms of resistance per foot;
( c ) Wire-countered hoses shall not be used;
( d ) Conductive parts of the loading equipment shall be bonded and grounded and grounds shall not be made to other potential sources of extraneous electricity; and
( e ) Plastic tubes shall not be used as hole liners if the hole contains an electric detonator.
### §3. Duties of council

It shall be the duty of the Council of National Defense to supervise and direct investigations and make recommendations to the President and the heads of executive departments as to the location of railroads with reference to the frontier of the United States so as to render possible expeditious concentration of troops and supplies to points of defense; the coordination of military, industrial, and commercial purposes in the location of branch lines of railroad; the utilization of waterways; the mobilization of military and naval resources for defense; the increase of domestic production of articles and materials essential to the support of armies and of the people during the interruption of foreign commerce; the development of seagoing transportation; data as to amounts, location, method and means of production, and availability of military supplies; the giving of information to producers and manufacturers as to the class of supplies needed by the military and other services of the Government, the requirements relating thereto, and the creation of relations which will render possible in time of need the immediate concentration and utilization of the resources of the Nation.

(Aug. 29, 1916, ch. 418, §2, 39 Stat. 649; Nov. 9, 1921, ch. 119, §3, 42 Stat. 212.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The words "extensive highways and" which preceded "branch lines of railroad" omitted on authority of act Nov. 9, 1921, which transferred powers and duties of Council relating to highways to Secretary of Commerce.
#### § 57.10001 Filling buckets.

Buckets shall not be overloaded, and feed shall be regulated to prevent spillage.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Discovery Oil Ltd, a Delaware corporation, (the Company) hereby certifies to such officers knowledge that:



1.

This quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  August 10, 2005

/s/ Andrew Ippolito

________________________________

Andrew Ippolito

President, Director, and Chief Financial Officer
### §47172. Air traffic procedures for airport capacity enhancement projects at congested airports

(a) In General.—The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration may consider prescribing flight procedures to avoid or minimize potentially significant adverse noise impacts of an airport capacity enhancement project at a congested airport that involves the construction of new runways or the reconfiguration of existing runways during the environmental planning process for the project. If the Administrator determines that noise mitigation flight procedures are consistent with safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace, the Administrator may commit, at the request of the airport sponsor and in a manner consistent with applicable Federal law, to prescribing such procedures in any record of decision approving the project.

(b) Modification.—Notwithstanding any commitment by the Administrator under subsection (a), the Administrator may initiate changes to such procedures if necessary to maintain safety and efficiency in light of new information or changed circumstances.

(Added Pub. L. 108–176, title III, §304(a), Dec. 12, 2003, 117 Stat. 2537.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable only to fiscal years beginning after Sept. 30, 2003, except as otherwise specifically provided, see section 3 of Pub. L. 108–176, set out an Effective Date of 2003 Amendment note under section 106 of this title.
# C_2023317EN.01001001.xml

| 7.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 317/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 317/10

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.11261 – ARDIAN / ATTERO)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 317/07)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Ardian France S.A. (‘Ardian’, France), controlled by the ultimate parent company of the Ardian Group, Ardian Holding S.A.S. (France), |
| --- | --- |

—

Ardian France S.A. (‘Ardian’, France), controlled by the ultimate parent company of the Ardian Group, Ardian Holding S.A.S. (France),

| — | Sabaton Ventures Holdco B.V. (‘Netherlands’), the ultimate parent company of the Attero Group (‘Attero’, Netherlands), |
| --- | --- |

—

Sabaton Ventures Holdco B.V. (‘Netherlands’), the ultimate parent company of the Attero Group (‘Attero’, Netherlands),

Ardian will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Attero.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | Ardian is a private equity investor and asset manager, |
| --- | --- |

—

Ardian is a private equity investor and asset manager,

| — | Attero is a waste management and waste treatment company. Its activities include generating energy from waste, recycling plastic, processing organic waste, valorisation of inert mineral waste, soil remediation, and debris recycling. |
| --- | --- |

—

Attero is a waste management and waste treatment company. Its activities include generating energy from waste, recycling plastic, processing organic waste, valorisation of inert mineral waste, soil remediation, and debris recycling.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.11261– ARDIAN / ATTERO

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  
  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---