alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Evaluation of the geologic and hydrologic factors related to the waste-storage potential of Mesozoic aquifers in the southern part of the Atlantic Coastal Plain, South Carolina and Georgia

By: Philip M. BrownD.L. BrownM.S. ReidO. B. Lloyd Jr.

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1088

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 9**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 10**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 11**                            (pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Evaluation of the geologic and hydrologic factors related to the waste-storage potential of Mesozoic aquifers in the southern part of the Atlantic Coastal Plain, South Carolina and Georgia(1978)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<Page>

                                                            Exhibit 10.33(c)


                             AMENDMENT TO AMENDED &
                          RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

      This Amendment (the "Amendment") to the Amended & Restated Employment
Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into and made as of September 30, 2002,
between REPUBLIC AIRWAYS HOLDINGS INC. (the "Company") and BRYAN K. BEDFORD (the
"Executive").
                                 R E C I T A L S

      WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive are parties to the Agreement;
and

      WHEREAS, the effectiveness of the Agreement was conditioned on and subject
to the successful completion of an initial public offering by the Company of
shares of its common stock on or before September 30, 2002 (the "IPO
Condition"); and

      WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement
to extend the deadline for satisfaction of the IPO Condition;

      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants
hereinafter set forth, and intending to be legally bound, the parties hereto
agree as follows:

      1.    The Agreement shall be amended by deleting Section 2 thereof
and replacing it with the following:

"2.   INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING. The effectiveness of this Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement is expressly conditioned upon and subject to the
successful completion on or before March 31, 2003, of an initial public
offering by the Company of shares of its common stock (an "IPO"). The
Effective Date of this Amended & Restated Employment Agreement shall be the
effective date of the IPO, or if the Company waives such requirement, the date
of such waiver. In the event the Effective Date has not occurred as of March
31, 2003, this Amended and Restated Employment Agreement shall be null and
void and shall have no force or effect and the Prior Agreement shall continue
according to its terms."

      2.    Except as specifically amended hereby, the Agreement remains
unchanged in all other respects.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of
the date first above written.


REPUBLIC AIRWAYS HOLDINGS INC.                  BRYAN K. BEDFORD



By: /s/ Arthur Amron                            /s/ Bryan K. Bedford
    Name: Arthur Amron
    Title:
#### GARRISON, Appellant, v. HOLME et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 6, 1903.)

Action by Annie A. Garrison against Leicester Holme and others. A. V. Campbell, for appellant. J. Delahunty, for respondents.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### § 57.15030 Provision and maintenance of self-rescue devices.

A 1-hour self-rescue device approved by MSHA and NIOSH under 42 CFR part 84 shall be made available by the operator to all personnel underground. Each operator shall maintain self-rescue devices in good condition.

[60 FR 30401, June 8, 1995]
### §3334n. Certification relating to information technology and software systems

#### (a) Certifications required

Prior to the date on which the head of an element of the intelligence community enters into, renews, or extends a contract for the acquisition of an information technology or software system, the head shall certify to the Director of National Intelligence the following:

(1) That the information technology or software system is the most up-to-date version of the system available or, if it is not, why a more out of date version was chosen.

(2) That the information technology or software system is compatible with integrating new and emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence.

(3) That the information technology or software system was thoroughly reviewed and alternative products are not superior to meet the requirements of the element.

#### (b) Exemption

The Director of National Intelligence may exempt elements of the intelligence community, as appropriate, from the requirements under (a) 1 if meeting such requirements may pose security or operational risks.

#### (c) Guidance

The Director shall issue to the heads of the elements of the intelligence community, and submit to the congressional intelligence committees, the Subcommittee on Defense of the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate, and the Subcommittee on Defense of the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives, guidance to—

(1) establish guidelines that the heads of the relevant elements of the intelligence community shall use to evaluate the criteria required for the certifications under subsection (a);

(2) incentivize each such head to adopt and integrate new and emerging technology within information technology and software systems of the element and to decommission and replace outdated systems, including through potential funding enhancements; and

(3) incentivize, and hold accountable, personnel of the intelligence community with respect to the integration of new and emerging technology within such systems, including through the provision of appropriate training programs and evaluations.

(Pub. L. 117–263, div. F, title LXVII, §6718, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3577.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

For definitions of "intelligence community" and "congressional intelligence committees" as used in this section, see section 6002 of Pub. L. 117–263, set out as a note under section 3003 of this title.

For definitions of "emerging technology" and "artificial intelligence" as used in this section, see section 6701 of Pub. L. 117–263, set out as a note under section 3024 of this title.

1 So in original. Probably should be "subsection (a)".
#### Dorothy Hopkins et al., Appellants, v Carol P. Haber et al., Respondents.

[835 NYS2d 233]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Bangs County (Demarest, J.), dated May 18, 2006, which denied their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs failed to establish, prima facie, that the defendant driver’s alleged negligence in the operation of her vehicle was the sole proximate cause of the accident (see *Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851 [1985]). Here, a triable issue of fact exists as to whether the plaintiffs’ decedent was crossing the street within the crosswalk and whether she contributed to the cause of the accident (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1152 [a]; *Parrinello v Davis,*2 AD3d 610 [2003]; *Dragunova v Dondero,*305 AD2d 449 [2003]; *Ruocco v Mulhall,*281 AD2d 406 [2001]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability. Santucci, J.P., Krausman, Lifson and Dillon, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                             243
<SECURITIES>                                       333
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2845
<ALLOWANCES>                                        27
<INVENTORY>                                        625
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2842
<PP&E>                                            2598
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1123
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    6928
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2502
<BONDS>                                           2075
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          4
<COMMON>                                          2139
<OTHER-SE>                                       (852)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      6928
<SALES>                                           8326
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  8647
<CGS>                                             6862
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     8056
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   216
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     4
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 135
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    591
<INCOME-TAX>                                        47
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                544
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       544
<EPS-BASIC>                                       8.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     8.20


</TABLE>
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Kathryn Denise McDuff

, * From the County Court at Law No. 2

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 2

- 917

- 23

.

Vs

. No. 11

- 2 4

- 00 2 19

- CR * September 2 6 , 20 2 4

The State of Texas, * Memorand um Opinion by Trotter, J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J., and W illiams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that t he appeal

should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance with this

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
§ 57.14104 Tire repairs. ( a ) Before a tire is removed from a vehicle for tire repair, the valve core shall be partially removed to allow for gradual deflation and then removed. During deflation, to the extent possible, persons shall stand outside of the potential trajectory of the lock ring of a multi-piece wheel rim.
( b ) To prevent injury from wheel rims during tire inflation, one of the following shall be used: ( 1 ) A wheel cage or other restraining device that will constrain all wheel rim components during an explosive separation of a multi-piece wheel rim, or during the sudden release of contained air in a single piece rim wheel; or
( 2 ) A stand-off inflation device which permits persons to stand outside of the potential trajectory of wheel components.
### **CHAPTER 453—FEES**

Sec.
45301.
General provisions.
45302.
Fees involving aircraft not providing air transportation.
45303.
Administrative provisions.
45304.
Maximum fees for private person services.
45305.
Registration, certification, and related fees.
45306.
Manual surcharge.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2024**—Pub. L. 118–63, title XI, §1101(q), May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1414, added item 45306.

**2012**—Pub. L. 112–95, title I, §122(b), Feb. 14, 2012, 126 Stat. 20, added item 45305.

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–264, title II, §§273(b), 276(b), Oct. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 3240, 3248, substituted "General provisions" for "Authority to impose fees" in item 45301, added items 45303 and 45304, and struck out former item 45303 "Maximum fees for private person services".
Sanitized Copy

Sanitized Copy

Attachment 3

FTIR Spectra
#### § 71.401 Location of facilities.

Bathhouses, change rooms, and sanitary flush toilet facilities shall be in a location convenient for the use of the miners. Where these facilities are designed to serve more than one mine, they shall be centrally located so as to be convenient for the use of all miners served by the facilities.
§ 585.613 How will BOEM process my SAP? ( a ) BOEM will review your submitted SAP, and additional information provided pursuant to § 585.611, to determine if it contains the information necessary to conduct our technical and environmental reviews. ( 1 ) We will notify you if we deem your proposed facility or combination of facilities to be complex or significant; and
( 2 ) We will notify you if your submitted SAP lacks any necessary information.
( b ) BOEM will prepare a NEPA analysis, as appropriate.
( c ) As appropriate, we will coordinate and consult with relevant Federal and State agencies, affected federally recognized Indian Tribes and executives of relevant local governments and will provide to other Federal, State, and local agencies and affected federally recognized Indian Tribes relevant nonproprietary data and information pertaining to your proposed activities.
( d ) During the review process, we may request additional information if we determine that the information provided is not sufficient to complete the review and approval process. If you fail to provide the requested information, BOEM may disapprove your SAP.
( e ) Upon completion of our technical and environmental reviews and other reviews required by Federal laws (*e.g.,* CZMA), BOEM will approve, disapprove, or approve with conditions your SAP. ( 1 ) If we approve your SAP, we will specify terms and conditions to be incorporated into your SAP. You must certify compliance with those terms and conditions, required under 30 CFR 285.615(b); and
( 2 ) If we disapprove your SAP, we will inform you of the reasons and allow you an opportunity to submit a revised plan addressing our concerns, and we may suspend your lease, as appropriate, to give you a reasonable amount of time to resubmit the SAP.
* Pursuant to 5TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40474 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CESAR CALDERON, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:03-CR-170-ALL

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Cesar Calderon has moved for leave to withdraw from representation and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Calderon has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Calderon’s response shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Although Calderon argues in his response that his counsel was ineffective for various reasons, the record is insufficiently developed toNo. 06-40474 -2- allow consideration of these claims on direct appeal. See United States v. Higdon , 832 F.2d 312, 313-14 (5th Cir. 1987). Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH C IR . R. 42.2. The Government’s motion to dismiss is DENIED as moot.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STATEMENTS
OF FINANCIAL POSITION STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND UNASSIGNED DEFICIT AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          13848316
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                         13848316
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                           13848316
<EQUITIES>                                    30305498
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  2268120
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                46421934
<CASH>                                         7321515
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              6517773444
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                      0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 1580826
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                              138200680
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       2600000
<OTHER-SE>                                    66953706
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                6517773444
<PREMIUMS>                                  1027373531
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            5172160
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                   381764918
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3152160
<INCOME-TAX>                                     85252
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3066908
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3066908
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# ":I \\ 1\


### .~ '" r, ..
March 12, 2014 Susan L.Kurland Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, D.C.20590
Re: Application of Vision Airlines d/b/a People Expressfor Operating Authorizations at Washington Reagan Airport DearAssistant Secretary Kurland, On behalf ofVision Airlines, d/b/a People ExpressAirlines, Iwould like to request the granting of the two slot exemptions previously granted to Republic Airlines for operation of scheduled passenger flights between Washington ReaganAirport (DCA)and Myrtle Beach (MYR) and West Palm Beach (PBI). The proposed schedule isasfollows: 1. MYR 1020 - 1120 DCA

DCA 1150 - 1300 MYR • June - October 2. PBI 1000 - 1215 DCA

DCA 1245 - 1455 PBI • October - March
All flights would operate seven days per week and exact times areflexible to comply with hour time slot assignment limits. The carrier anticipates beginning service at DCAon or about June 16, 2014 with one way fares below $100 on all flights.

Byway of background, Vision Airlines isacertificated, Part 121 air carrier. Vision and PEOPLExpresshave entered into an ACMI agreement and the carrier ispreparing to establish regular scheduled service along the EastCoast dba under the People Express name. The slots requested herein will enable the carrier to establish its initial services to Washington, D.C.to markets not currently served non-stop and/or underserved with high fare service. We appreciate your assistance in this matter, and we stand ready to work with you to arrange suitable OA'sto enable People Expressto bring important new service in markets that currently lack adequate service.

Error! Unknown document property name.Please don't hesitate to get in touch with me to discuss this request.

.ch Morisi Pe Ie ExpressAirlines, Inc.

902BlandBlvd Newport News,Virginia 23602 (757)969-6880 Direct: (757)560-3452
#### § 7.21 Purpose and effective date.

This subpart establishes the specific requirements for approval of brattice cloth and ventilation tubing. It is effective August 22, 1988. Applications for approval or extension of approval submitted after August 22, 1989, shall meet the requirements of this part.
#### WATSON, Respondent, v. ROCKWELL, Appellant, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

March 29, 1905.)

Action by Samuel E. Watson, as executor, etc., of Emma B. Watson, deceased, against Hosea H. Rockwell, impleaded with others.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

SMITH and CHASE, JJ., dissent
### §403–3f. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 403–3f, comprising section 103F of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as section 3031 of this title.