alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1601. Termination of existing declared emergencies

(a) All powers and authorities possessed by the President, any other officer or employee of the Federal Government, or any executive agency, as defined in section 105 of title 5, as a result of the existence of any declaration of national emergency in effect on September 14, 1976, are terminated two years from September 14, 1976. Such termination shall not affect—

(1) any action taken or proceeding pending not finally concluded or determined on such date;

(2) any action or proceeding based on any act committed prior to such date; or

(3) any rights or duties that matured or penalties that were incurred prior to such date.

(b) For the purpose of this section, the words "any national emergency in effect" means a general declaration of emergency made by the President.

(Pub. L. 94–412, title I, §101, Sept. 14, 1976, 90 Stat. 1255.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 94–412, §1, Sept. 14, 1976, 90 Stat. 1255, provided: "That this Act [enacting this chapter, amending section 1481 of Title 8, Aliens and Nationality, and section 2667 of Title 10, Armed Forces, repealing section 249 of Title 12, Banks and Banking, section 831d of Title 16, Conservation, section 1383 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, section 211b of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, and section 1742 of the former Appendix to this title, and enacting provisions set out below] may be cited as the 'National Emergencies Act'."

#### Savings Provision

Pub. L. 94–412, title V, §501(h), Sept. 14, 1976, 90 Stat. 1258, provided that: "This section [amending section 1481 of Title 8, Aliens and Nationality and section 2667 of Title 10, Armed Forces, and repealing section 249 of Title 12, Banks and Banking, section 831d of Title 16, Conservation, section 1383 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and section 211b of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare] shall not affect—

"(1) any action taken or proceeding pending not finally concluded or determined at the time of repeal;

"(2) any action or proceeding based on any act committed prior to repeal; or

"(3) any rights or duties that matured or penalties that were incurred prior to repeal."
EXHIBIT 11

               DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES

                       Computation of Earnings Per Share
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      Three Months Ended            Nine Months Ended
                                                         September 30,                September 30,
                                                      1996          1995           1996          1995
                                                   ----------    ----------     ----------    ----------
<S>                                                    <C>           <C>            <C>           <C>
Weighted Average Common Shares:
    Average Common Shares Outstanding                  53,300        50,000         53,300        50,000
   Average Restricted Stock Units Outstanding           5,140                        5,160
   Average Common Shares Issuable Under
     Employee Benefit Plans                             1,171                        1,303


   Pro forma average common shares upon
     issuance of Restricted Stock Units Under
     the Treasury Stock Method                              -         1,475                        1,475
                                                   ----------    ----------     ----------    ----------
                                                                                         -

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding             59,611                       59,763
                                                   ==========                   ==========

Pro forma Weighted Average Common Shares
 Outstanding                                                         51,475                       51,475
                                                                 ==========                   ==========

Earnings:
    Net Income                                      $  56,100     $  42,000     $  218,200     $ 121,500
     Less:  Preferred Stock Dividend Requirement        4,967         4,967         14,901        14,901
                                                   ----------    ----------     ----------    ----------

Earnings Applicable to Common Shares                $  51,133     $  37,033     $  203,299     $ 106,599
                                                   ==========    ==========     ==========    ==========


Earnings Per Common Share                           $    0.86                   $     3.40
                                                   ==========                   ==========


Pro forma Earnings Per Common Share                               $    0.72                    $    2.07
                                                                 ==========                   ==========
</TABLE>

Weighted average common shares outstanding are the same for both primary and
fully diluted earnings per common share.

                                      25
§ 57.22601 Blasting from the surface (I-A mines). ( a ) All development, production, and bench rounds shall be initiated from the surface after all persons are out of the mine. Persons shall not enter the mine until ventilating air has passed over the blast area and through at least one atmospheric monitoring sensor.
( b ) After blasting, if the monitoring system indicates that methane in the mine is less than 1.0 percent, persons may enter the mine. All places blasted shall be tested for methane by a competent person before work is started.
( c ) If the monitoring system indicates the presence of 1.0 percent or more methane, persons other than examiners shall not enter the mine until the mine has been examined by a competent person and the methane content has been reduced to less than 1.0 percent.
( d ) Vehicles used for transportation when examining the mine shall be approved by MSHA under the applicable requirements of 30 CFR parts 18 through 36.
[52 FR 24941, July 1, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 9615, Mar. 24, 1988] Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 53 FR 9615, Mar. 24, 1988, § 57.22601 was stayed until further notice.
QUICK

CARDTM

Mold

Molds are microscopic organisms found everywhere

in the environment, indoors and outdoors. When

present in large quantities, molds have the potential

to cause adverse health effects.

Health Effects of Mold Exposure

• Sneezing • Cough and congestion

• Runny nose • Aggravation of asthma

• Eye irritation • Dermatitis (skin rash)

People at Greatest Risk of Health Effects 

• Individuals with allergies, asthma, sinusitis, or 

other lung diseases.

• Individuals with a weakened immune system 

(e.g., HIV patients).

How to Recognize Mold

• Sight – Usually appear as colored woolly mats. 

• Smell – Often produce a foul, musty, earthy smell.

Preventing Mold Growth 

• Remove excess moisture with a wet-dry vacuum

and dry out the building as quickly as possible. 

• Use fans to assist in the drying process. 

• Clean wet materials and surfaces with detergent

and water. 

• Discard all water damaged materials. 

• Discard all porous materials that have been wet for

more than 48 hours.

General Mold Cleanup Tips

• Identify and correct moisture problem.

• Make sure working area is well ventilated.

• Discard mold damaged materials in plastic bags. 

• Clean wet items and surfaces with detergent and

water. 

• Disinfect cleaned surfaces with 1/4 to 11/2 cup household bleach in 1 gallon of water. CAUTION: Do not

mix bleach with other cleaning products that contain ammonia.

• Use respiratory protection. A N-95 respirator is recommended.

• Use hand and eye protection.

OSHA 3263-09N-05

U.S. Department of Labor

www.osha.gov (800) 321-OSHA

For more complete information:

Occupational

Safety and Health

Administration
Exhibit 10.269


                                 PROMISSORY NOTE
                                  (NO INTEREST)

$11,200.00                                                  Glendale, California
   June 29, 2000




     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Aramis Markarovanes (Payor") promises to pay in lawful
money of the United States of America to Pollution Research and Control Corp., a
California corporation ("Payee"), or order, at Glendale, California, the sum of
$11,200.00 Dollars from the date hereof on the unpaid principal payable in
installments of principal only in the sum of $50.00 Dollars commencing on July
15, 2000 and payable on the same day of each month thereafter until paid in
full.

     The unpaid principal may be prepaid without penalty. Each payment hereunder
shall be credited to the principal amount.

     If each installment under this note is not paid when due, the undersigned
shall pay all costs of collection thereof, including reasonable attorneys' fees,
whether or not suit or action is commenced to enforce payment of this note, and
Payee may, at its option, declare the entire amount of the then unpaid principal
immediately due and payable if such default is not cured within 10 days after
Payee provides the undersigned written notice of such default. The undersigned
hereby waives presentment, notice of dishonor and protest.

     This note is secured by shares of Payee's common stock, no par value (the
"Shares"), pursuant to a certain Stock Pledge Agreement, dated as of June 29,
2000 (the "Pledge Agreement").

     Upon the termination of employment of Payor as an employee of Payee for any
reason, the unpaid balance of this note shall be cancelled, and the pro rata
portion of Shares which then not fully paid for, shall be returned to Payee
pursuant to the terms of the Pledge Agreement.

                                            Payor:



                                            By:  /s/  Aramis Markarovanes
                                               --------------------------------
                                                      Aramis Markarovanes
### §20304. Basic research enhancement

(a) Definition of Basic Research.—In this section, the term "basic research" has the meaning given the term in Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A–11.

(b) Coordination.—The Administrator, the Director of the National Science Foundation, the Secretary of Energy, the Secretary of Defense, and the Secretary of Commerce shall, to the extent practicable, coordinate basic research activities related to physical sciences, technology, engineering, and mathematics.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3357.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20304 | 42 U.S.C. 16658. | Pub. L. 110–69, title II, §2003, Aug. 9, 2007, 121 Stat. 583. |

Section
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7720

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DENNY R. GULLETT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-94-17, CA-97-456-2)

Submitted: June 5, 2003 Decided: June 25, 2003

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cheryl Johns Sturm, Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania, for Appellant.

Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,

Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Denny R. Gullett was convicted following a jury trial of one

count of maliciously damaging and destroying and attempting to

damage and destroy by means of an explosive a building used in

interstate commerce that resulted in death in violation of 18

U.S.C. § 844(i) (2000). Gullett was sentenced to thirty-eight years

in prison and five years of supervised release. Gullett filed a 28

U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion to vacate his sentence. The magistrate

judge recommended dismissal of Gullett’s claims. Following an

evidentiary hearing on the issue of whether there had been improper

contact during trial between a juror and the prosecution and a

prosecution witness, the district court denied the motion. 

An order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gullett has not
3

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
#### § 550.209 What is the BOEM review process for the notice?

The Regional Supervisor will review any notice required under § 550.208(a) and (b)(1) to ensure that your ancillary activity complies with the performance standards listed in § 550.202(a), (b), (d), and (e). The Regional Supervisor may notify you that your ancillary activity does not comply with those standards. In such a case, the Regional Supervisor will require you to submit an EP, DPP, or DOCD and you may not start your ancillary activity until the Regional Supervisor approves the EP, DPP, or DOCD.
### §§2570, 2571. Repealed. Pub. L. 117–263, div. C, title XXXI, §3132(b)(2), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3060

Section 2570, Pub. L. 108–375, div. C, title XXXI, §3133, Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2168, authorized the Silk Road Initiative.

Section 2571, Pub. L. 108–375, div. C, title XXXI, §3134, Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2169, related to Nuclear Nonproliferation Fellowships for scientists employed by the United States and the Russian Federation.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MUKHABBAT REMINES and MURAT RAKHMANKULOV,

Appellants,

v.

BRYAN REMINES,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-356

[July 30, 2020]

Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Nikolaus Hunter Davis, Judge; L.T. 

Case No. FMCE17015063.

Gary Grant of Grant Law Corporation, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellants.

Hollis E. Mandell of the Law Office of Hollis E. Mandell, Fort Lauderdale, 

for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LEVINE, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and FORST, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: HTS Services , Inc. v. US

- UK International Supply Group, LLC , Jean

Vallet Mobioh, and David J. Ma rlborough

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 9

- 0 0 55 8

- C V

Trial court case number: 1113219

Trial cour t: County Civil Co urt at Law No. 3 of Harris County

Date motion filed: Nov e mber 2 , 2020

Party filing motion: App el lant

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is denied

.

Judge’s signature:

____

/s/ Julie Countiss

______ Acting for the Court

P anel consists of: Justices Kelly, Goodman, and Countiss

.

Date: __ November 24, 2020

____
Exhibit No. 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) of The
Peoples BancTrust Company, Inc. (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby each certify that to the best of our
knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered
in the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|                                                         
|/s/ Elam P. Holley, Jr.                                  
|                                                         
|Elam P. Holley, Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer



|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|/s/ Andrew C. Bearden, Jr.                                                 
|                                                                           
|Andrew C. Bearden, Jr. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



March 25, 2004

(Date)
§ 6.10 Use of independent laboratories. ( a ) MSHA will accept testing and evaluation performed by an independent laboratory for purposes of MSHA product approval provided that MSHA receives as part of the application: ( 1 ) Written evidence of the laboratory's independence and current recognition by a laboratory accrediting organization;
( 2 ) Complete technical explanation of how the product complies with each requirement in the applicable MSHA product approval requirements;
( 3 ) Identification of components or features of the product that are critical to the safety of the product; and
( 4 ) All documentation, including drawings and specifications, as submitted to the independent laboratory by the applicant and as required by the applicable part under this chapter.
( b ) Product testing and evaluation performed by independent laboratories for purposes of MSHA approval must comply with the applicable MSHA product approval requirements.
( c ) Product testing and evaluation must be conducted or witnessed by the laboratory's personnel.
( d ) After review of the information required under paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(4) of this section, MSHA will notify the applicant if additional information or testing is required. The applicant must provide this information, arrange any additional or repeat tests and notify MSHA of the location, date, and time of the test(s). MSHA may observe any additional testing conducted by an independent laboratory. Further, MSHA may decide to conduct the additional or repeated tests at the applicant's expense. The applicant must supply any additional components necessary for testing and evaluation.
( e ) Upon request by MSHA, but not more than once a year, except for cause, approval holders of products approved based on independent laboratory testing and evaluation must make such products available for post-approval audit at a mutually agreeable site at no cost to MSHA.
( f ) Once the product is approved, the approval holder must notify MSHA of all product defects of which they become aware.
AJ. ROBBINS, P.C.
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                              216 SIXTEENTH STREET
                                    SUITE 600
                             DENVER, COLORADO 80202





            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the registration
statement (File No. 333-117444) on Form S-8 of Universal Detection Technology of
our report dated February 25, 2005 relating to the financial statements of
Universal Detection Technology .




                                            /s/ AJ. Robbins, P.C.
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            AJ. ROBBINS, P.C.
                                            CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS




DENVER, COLORADO
MARCH 30, 2005
#### B. GORTZ MFG. CO., Respondent, v. PARKS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 6, 1903.)

Action by the B. Gortz Manufacturing Company against William A. Parks. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Johnson & Higgins, for appellant. Phillips & Avery, for respondent.

BLANCHARD, J.

It is clear, from the evidence, that the parties to the written agreement upon which this action was brought intended that that instrument should relate to the prior contract made by the plaintiff with Teichman & Potter, and that the insertion of the word “Company” in the agreement was due to clerical error or mistake. On this point nothing *1119need be added to the opinion of the court at the trial. The judgment must therefore be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
### §60111. Financial responsibility for liquefied natural gas facilities

(a) Notice.—When the Secretary of Transportation believes that an operator of a liquefied natural gas facility does not have adequate financial responsibility for the facility, the Secretary may issue a notice to the operator about the inadequacy and the amount of financial responsibility the Secretary considers adequate.

(b) Hearings.—An operator receiving a notice under subsection (a) of this section may have a hearing on the record not later than 30 days after receiving the notice. The operator may show why the Secretary should not issue an order requiring the operator to demonstrate and maintain financial responsibility in at least the amount the Secretary considers adequate.

(c) Orders.—After an opportunity for a hearing on the record, the Secretary may issue the order if the Secretary decides it is justified in the public interest.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1317.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 60111(a) | 49 App.:1674b(b)(1), (c). | Aug. 12, 1968, Pub. L. 90–481, 82 Stat. 720, §7(b)(1)–(3), (c); added Nov. 30, 1979, Pub. L. 96–129, §153, 93 Stat. 1002. |
| 60111(b) | 49 App.:1674b(b)(2). | |
| 60111(c) | 49 App.:1674b(b)(3). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "is not maintaining adequate insurance or otherwise", the text of 49 App.:1674b(c), and the words "and serve upon" and "a statement of" are omitted as surplus.

In subsection (b), the words "in accordance with section 554 of title 5" are omitted for consistency in the revised title and because 5:554 applies to a hearing on the record unless otherwise stated. The words "to be held" and "cause as to" are omitted as surplus. The words "the Secretary considers adequate" are substituted for "indicated in the notice under paragraph (1)" for clarity and to eliminate unnecessary words.

Subsection (c) is substituted for 49 App.:1674b(b)(3) to eliminate unnecessary words.