alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00353-CR

Ex parte Faron Ray Truelove

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 47215-B, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On March 28, 2007, Faron RayTruelove filed an application for post-conviction writ

of habeas corpus in the district court seeking relief from his 1997 conviction for burglary of a

habitation. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07, § 3(a), (b) (West 2005). The district court

made written findings of fact, recommended that the relief sought by Truelove be denied, and

forwarded the record to the court of criminal appeals. See id. § 3(c). The court of criminal appeals

denied the application without written order on May 9, 2007. See id. § 5.

On May 23, 2007, Truelove filed in the district court a written notice of appeal from

the court of criminal appeals’s denial of his article 11.07 application. A clerk’s record was prepared

and sent to this Court, where it was filed. We now dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Article 11.07 establishes the exclusive procedure by which a person in custody

following a felony conviction may seek relief from a felony judgment imposing a penalty other than

death. Id. §§ 1, 5. Article 11.07 does not provide for an appeal from the court of criminal appeals’s
2

denial of relief. Moreover, this Court’s appellate jurisdiction does not extend to the judgments,

orders, and rulings of the court of criminal appeals. See Tex. Const. art. V, § 6; Tex. Code Crim.

Proc. Ann. art. 4.03 (West 2005).

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Pemberton

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: July 27, 2007

Do Not Publish
### NUMBER 13
- 14
- 00688
- C V
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

IN R E RAMIRO R. GARZA JR.

On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

.

ORDER
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria Order Per Curiam

Relator , Ramiro R. Garza Jr., p roceeding pro se, f iled a petition for writ of habeas

corpus in the above cause on December 2, 2014 requesting relief from confinement

. T he Court requests that the real party in interest , Jessi ca Marie Arredondo, or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of habeas corpus on or before the expiration of seven days from the date
of this order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed th e 3rd day of December , 201 4

.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Devcon International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Stephen J. Ruzika, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                              
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: November 21, 2005 |  | /s/ Stephen J. Ruzika        
|                        |  | Stephen J. Ruzika            
|                        |  | President and CEO            
|                        |  | (Principal Executive Officer)



Note: This certification is being
furnished, not filed, as exhibit 32.1
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9568 

To prohibit any person from using a motor vehicle to intentionally run 

over or kill a wild animal on public lands, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2024 

Ms. MACE (for herself, Mr. DAVIS of North Carolina, Mr. GAETZ, and Mr. 

CARTER of Louisiana) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit any person from using a motor vehicle to intentionally run over or kill a wild animal on public lands, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Snowmobiles Aren’t 

5 Weapons Act’’ or the ‘‘SAW Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9568 IH

1 SEC. 2. USE A MOTOR VEHICLE TO INTENTIONALLY RUN 

2 OVER OR KILL A WILD ANIMAL ON PUBLIC 

3 LANDS PROHIBITED. 

4 (a) PROHIBITION.—Except as provided in subsection 

5 (b), whoever intentionally uses a motor vehicle to run over, 

6 strike, or kill a wild animal on public lands shall be fined 

7 not more than $5,000, imprisoned not more than 1 year, 

8 or both. 

9 (b) EXCEPTIONS.—A person shall not be considered 

10 to have violated the prohibition in subsection (a) if their 

11 actions were taken— 

12 (1) to avoid injury or death to themselves or 

13 another person; 

14 (2) to avoid the destruction of personal prop15 erty; or 

16 (3) while conducting wildlife management ac17 tivities pursuant to a preexisting wildlife manage18 ment plan. 

19 (c) INVESTIGATION OF VIOLATIONS.—The Secretary 

20 of the Interior, or a person authorized by the Secretary— 

21 (1) shall make such investigations as the Sec22 retary deems necessary to determine whether any 

23 person has violated or is violating this Act; and 

24 (2) when conducting investigations under this 

25 subsection, may request and accept the assistance of 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 9568 IH

1 State and local law enforcement and governmental 

2 agencies. 

3 (d) STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this 

4 Act shall be construed to affect section 13 of the Fish 

5 and Wildlife Act of 1956 (16 U.S.C. 742j–1). 

6 (e) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act— 

7 (1) the term ‘‘motor vehicle’’ means a ground8 based self-propelled vehicle or a vehicle propelled or 

9 drawn by a ground-based self-propelled vehicle; 

10 (2) the term ‘‘public lands’’ means any land 

11 owned by the United States and administered by the 

12 Secretary of the Interior, except lands where the 

13 title is held in trust by the United States for the 

14 benefit of an American Indian tribe or an individual 

15 American Indian; and 

16 (3) the term ‘‘wild animal’’ means a wolf or 

17 coyote. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
§ 46.7 New task training. ( a ) You must provide any miner who is reassigned to a new task in which he or she has no previous work experience with training in the health and safety aspects of the task to be assigned, including the safe work procedures of such task, information about the physical and health hazards of chemicals in the miner's work area, the protective measures a miner can take against these hazards, and the contents of the mine's HazCom program. This training must be provided before the miner performs the new task.
( b ) If a change occurs in a miner's assigned task that affects the health and safety risks encountered by the miner, you must provide the miner with training under paragraph (a) of this section that addresses the change.
( c ) You are not required to provide new task training under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section to miners who have received training in a similar task or who have previous work experience in the task, and who can demonstrate the necessary skills to perform the task in a safe and healthful manner. To determine whether task training under this section is required, you must observe that the miner can perform the task in a safe and healthful manner.
( d ) Practice under the close observation of a competent person may be used to fulfill the requirement for task training under this section, if hazard recognition training specific to the assigned task is given before the miner performs the task.
( e ) Training provided under this section may be credited toward new miner training, as appropriate.
[64 FR 53130, Sept. 30, 1999, as amended at 67 FR 42382, June 21, 2002]
### §30129. Crash avoidance technology

(a) In General.—The Secretary of Transportation shall promulgate a rule—

(1) to establish minimum performance standards with respect to crash avoidance technology; and

(2) to require that all passenger motor vehicles manufactured for sale in the United States on or after the compliance date described in subsection (b) shall be equipped with—

(A) a forward collision warning and automatic emergency braking system that—

(i) alerts the driver if—

(I) the distance to a vehicle ahead or an object in the path of travel ahead is closing too quickly; and

(II) a collision is imminent; and

(ii) automatically applies the brakes if the driver fails to do so; and

(B) a lane departure warning and lane-keeping assist system that—

(i) warns the driver to maintain the lane of travel; and

(ii) corrects the course of travel if the driver fails to do so.

(b) Compliance Date.—The Secretary of Transportation shall determine the appropriate effective date, and any phasing-in of requirements, of the final rule promulgated pursuant to subsection (a).

(Added Pub. L. 117–58, div. B, title IV, §24208(a), Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 823.)
#### § 57.5038 Annual exposure limits.

No person shall be permitted to receive an exposure in excess of 4 WLM in any calendar year.
#### § 585.612 How will my SAP be processed for Federal consistency under the Coastal Zone Management Act?

Your SAP will be processed based on whether it is submitted before or after your lease is issued:

| If your SAP is submitted: | Consistency review of your SAP will be handled as follows: |
| --- | --- |
| (a) Before lease issuance | You will furnish a copy of your SAP, consistency certification, and necessary data and information to conduct an adequate consistency review to the applicable State CZMA agency or agencies if required by 15 CFR part 930, subpart D. and submit a copy to BOEM in accordance with § 585.111. |
| (b) After lease issuance | You must submit a copy of your SAP, consistency certification, and necessary data and information pursuant to 15 CFR part 930, subpart E, to BOEM only if BOEM did not consider the proposed site assessment activities for your lease area under its previously submitted consistency determination under 15 CFR part 930, subpart C, and if required by 15 CFR part 930, subpart E. BOEM will forward to the applicable State CZMA agency or agencies one copy of your SAP, consistency certification, and necessary data and information required to conduct an adequate consistency review under 15 CFR part 930, subpart E, after BOEM has determined that all information requirements for the SAP are met. |
### §404k. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 404k, comprising section 116 of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as section 3053 of this title.
#### § 57.11007 Wooden components of ladders.

Wooden components of ladders shall not be painted except with a transparent finish.
EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Comtech Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jeffrey Kang, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for
the period certified.

      Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.

         Signed on this 22nd day of December, 2004.

                                       /s/ Jeffrey Kang
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Jeffrey Kang

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Comtech Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Hope Ni, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for
the period certified.

      Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.

      Signed on this 22nd day of December, 2004.

                                       /s/ Hope Ni
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Hope Ni
#### §§ 585.423-585.424 [Reserved]
### §1322. Board action

(a) Effective Date of Actions.—Unless otherwise provided in subtitle IV, the Board may determine, within a reasonable time, when its actions, other than an action ordering the payment of money, take effect.

(b) Terminating and Changing Actions.—An action of the Board remains in effect under its own terms or until superseded. The Board may change, suspend, or set aside any such action on notice. Notice may be given in a manner determined by the Board. A court of competent jurisdiction may suspend or set aside any such action.

(c) Reconsidering Actions.—The Board may, at any time on its own initiative because of material error, new evidence, or substantially changed circumstances—

(1) reopen a proceeding;

(2) grant rehearing, reargument, or reconsideration of an action of the Board; or

(3) change an action of the Board.

An interested party may petition to reopen and reconsider an action of the Board under this subsection under regulations of the Board.

(d) Finality of Actions.—Notwithstanding subtitle IV, an action of the Board under this section is final on the date on which it is served, and a civil action to enforce, enjoin, suspend, or set aside the action may be filed after that date.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title II, §201(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 936, §722; renumbered §1322, Pub. L. 114–110, §3(a)(5), Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 2228.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2015—Pub. L. 114–110 renumbered section 722 of this title as this section.
§ 72.520 Diesel equipment inventory. ( a ) The operator of each mine that utilizes diesel equipment underground, shall prepare and submit in writing to the District Manager, an inventory of diesel equipment used in the mine. The inventory shall include the number and type of diesel-powered units used underground, including make and model of unit, type of equipment, make and model of engine, serial number of engine, brake horsepower rating of engine, emissions of engine in grams per hour or grams per brake horsepower-hour, approval number of engine, make and model of aftertreatment device, serial number of aftertreatment device if available, and efficiency of aftertreatment device.
( b ) The mine operator shall make changes to the diesel equipment inventory as equipment or emission control systems are added, deleted or modified and submit revisions, to the District Manager, within 7 calendar days.
( c ) If requested, the mine operator shall provide a copy of the diesel equipment inventory to the representative of the miners within 3 days of the request.
### §3936. Statute of limitations

#### (a) Tolling of statutes of limitation during military service

The period of a servicemember's military service may not be included in computing any period limited by law, regulation, or order for the bringing of any action or proceeding in a court, or in any board, bureau, commission, department, or other agency of a State (or political subdivision of a State) or the United States by or against the servicemember or the servicemember's heirs, executors, administrators, or assigns.

#### (b) Redemption of real property

A period of military service may not be included in computing any period provided by law for the redemption of real property sold or forfeited to enforce an obligation, tax, or assessment.

#### (c) Inapplicability to internal revenue laws

This section does not apply to any period of limitation prescribed by or under the internal revenue laws of the United States.

(Oct. 17, 1940, ch. 888, title II, §206, as added Pub. L. 108–189, §1, Dec. 19, 2003, 117 Stat. 2844.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 526 of the former Appendix to this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 206 of act Oct. 17, 1940, ch. 888, art. II, as added Oct. 6, 1942, ch. 581, §6, 56 Stat. 771; amended Pub. L. 102–12, §9(7), Mar. 18, 1991, 105 Stat. 39, related to maximum rate of interest, prior to the general amendment of this Act by Pub. L. 108–189. See section 3937 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to any case not final before Dec. 19, 2003, see section 3 of Pub. L. 108–189, set out as a note under section 3901 of this title.
May 17, 1977.

M. P. No. 77-144.

#### Anthony DeLuca *v.*Rhode Island State Board of Elections *et al.*

*DeSano & Thibodeau, Robert S. Goldman, Keven A. McKenna,*for petitioner.

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *William Granfield Brody,*Special Asst. Attorney General, *Peter Palombo, Jr.,*City Solicitor, *Stephen F. Achille,*for respondents.

The motion of the respondent Board of Canvassers and the respondent City Clerk asking that this court authorize the granting by the Board of Elections of a continuance of a hearing scheduled for Wednesday, May 18, 1977 at 1:30 p.m., from that date to Friday, May 20, 1977 is hereby denied.
§ 585.527 May I demonstrate financial strength and reliability to meet the financial assurance requirement for lease or grant activities? BOEM may allow you to use your financial strength and reliability to meet financial assurance requirements if: ( a ) You have an investment grade issuer credit rating. If any Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)-recognized NRSRO provides a credit rating that differs from any other SEC-recognized NRSRO credit rating, BOEM will apply the highest rating for the purposes of determining your financial assurance requirements.
( b ) You have a proxy credit rating determined by BOEM, which must be based on audited financial information for the most recent fiscal year (which must include an income statement, balance sheet, statement of cash flows, and the auditor's certificate). ( 1 ) The audited financial information for your most recent fiscal year must cover a continuous twelve-month period within the twenty-four-month period prior to the lessee's receipt of the determination that you must provide supplemental financial assurance.
( 2 ) In determining your proxy credit rating, BOEM may include the value of the offshore decommissioning liabilities associated with any lease(s) or grants in which you have an ownership interest. Upon BOEM's request, you must provide the information that BOEM determines is necessary to properly evaluate your offshore decommissioning liabilities, including joint ownership interests and liabilities associated with your OCS leases and grants.
( c ) Your co-lessee or co-grant-holder has an issuer credit rating or a proxy credit rating that meets the criteria set forth in paragraph (a) of this section; however, BOEM may require you to provide financial assurance for decommissioning obligations for which such co-lessee or co-grant-holder is not liable.
( d ) You have a contract with a counterparty that projects net income will exceed three times the estimated decommissioning expenses associated with the facilities that will generate that income.
( e ) If we approve your request to use your financial strength and reliability to meet your financial assurance requirements, you must submit annual updates.
( f ) If the annual updates do not continue to demonstrate financial strength and reliability or BOEM has reason to believe that you are unable to meet the requirements of this section, after notice and opportunity for a hearing, BOEM will terminate your ability to use financial strength and reliability for financial assurance and require you to provide another type of financial assurance. You must provide this new financial assurance instrument within 90 days after we terminate your use of financial strength and reliability.
# C_2023295EN.01000201.xml

| 21.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11146 – SILVER LAKE / SOFTWARE AG)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 295/02)

On 27 June 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11146. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11146. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---