alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 12

                 John Deere Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries
               Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                             (thousands of dollars)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                          Three Months Ended 31 January                      For the Years Ended October 31,
                          -----------------------------    --------------------------------------------------------------------
                                2002          2001              2001          2000         1999           1998         1997
                          --------------  -------------    ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
<S>                       <C>             <C>              <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Earnings:
 Income before income
   taxes and changes
   in accounting          $      111,966  $      66,202    $    245,662  $    216,712  $    235,760  $    233,534  $    211,251
 Fixed charges                    98,772        125,183         459,348       447,169       366,102       373,237       330,648
                          --------------  -------------    ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
  Total earnings          $      210,738  $     191,385    $    705,010  $    663,881  $    601,862  $    606,771  $    541,899
                          ==============  =============    ============  ============  ============  ============  ============
Fixed charges:
   Interest expense       $       97,572  $     123,407    $    452,032  $    440,220  $    360,925  $    368,381  $    326,866
   Rent expense                    1,200  $       1,776           7,316         6,949         5,177         4,856         3,782
                          --------------  -------------    ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
  Total fixed charges     $       98,772  $     125,183    $    459,348  $    447,169  $    366,102  $    373,237  $    330,648
                          ==============  =============    ============  ============  ============  ============  ============

Ratio of earnings to
 fixed charges *                    2.13           1.53            1.53          1.48          1.64          1.63          1.64
                          ==============  =============    ============  ============  ============  ============  ============
</TABLE>

"Earnings" consist of income before income taxes, the cumulative effect of
changes in accounting and fixed charges. "Fixed charges" consist of interest on
indebtedness, amortization of debt discount and expense, an estimated amount of
rental expense under capitalized leases which is deemed to be representative of
the interest factor and rental expense under operating leases.

*  The Company has not issued preferred stock. Therefore, the ratios of earnings
   to combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends are the same as the
   ratios presented above.

                                       16
#### Joseph Gaza et al., Appellants, v. Lloyd Bennett, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event. Memorandum: Plaintiffs seek to recover damages from the infant defendant for his alleged negligent acts in igniting material in a barn that caused its destruction by fire. Upon the trial a supervisor of education of a central school produced certain school records of the infant pursuant to subpoena duces tecum served by plaintiffs. The trial court declined to examine the records, in substance refused to permit plaintiffs’ counsel to examine them and precluded all use thereof. Various grounds were assigned for the rulings. First, the trial court announced that they were privileged under the Education Law, again that the parents had not consented .to their use and finally that they undoubtedly referred “ to medical examinations conducted by the school, which are privileged under the Civil Practice Act.” The early foreclosure of all exploration of the records prevents us from intelligently ruling on their admissibility. No provision of the Education Law is cited by respondent that makes the records in and of themselves privileged. Instead of the abrupt rulings tbe trial court should have examined the records and passed upon their use and admissibility in the light of applicable rules of evidence. Finally, we conclude that it was error to dismiss the complaint. The proof submitted was sufficient to require a denial of the motion made at the close of plaintiffs’ proof. (Appeal from a judgment of Onondaga Trial Term dismissing the complaint on the merits.) Present — Williams, P. J., B as tow, Goldman and Noonan, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM DIONICS, INC.'S  QUARTERLY  REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                         524,000
<SECURITIES>                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                  364,100
<ALLOWANCES>                   0
<INVENTORY>                    488,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               1,409,500
<PP&E>                         1,704,200
<DEPRECIATION>                 1,651,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 1,513,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          371,300
<BONDS>                        1,138,800
<COMMON>                       38,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          0
<PREFERRED>                    0
<OTHER-SE>                     1,522,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   1,513,700
<SALES>                        1,005,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               1,005,200
<CGS>                          673,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  859,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             44,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                112,100
<INCOME-TAX>                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            112,100
<DISCONTINUED>                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                0
<CHANGES>                      0
<NET-INCOME>                   112,100
<EPS-BASIC>                  .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                  .03


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000028385
<NAME> THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              16
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      584
<ALLOWANCES>                                        20
<INVENTORY>                                        312
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   943
<PP&E>                                          15,406
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,814
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,837
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,200
<BONDS>                                          3,512
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         48
<COMMON>                                         1,951
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,547
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,837
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,998
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,229
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    13
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 208
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    548
<INCOME-TAX>                                       230
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                318
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       318
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### §2655. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLV, §4504(c), formerly Pub. L. 107–107, div. C, title XXXI, §3152(c), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1377; renumbered Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLV, §4504(c), and amended Pub. L. 108–136, div. C, title XXXI, §3141(h)(5)(A), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1772

Section, Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLV, §4504A, formerly Pub. L. 106–65, div. C, title XXXI, §3154, Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 941; Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [div. C, title XXXI, §3135], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–456; renumbered Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLV, §4504A, and amended Pub. L. 108–136, div. C, title XXXI, §3141(h)(5)(B), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1773, related to a counterintelligence polygraph program for the defense-related activities of the Department of Energy. See section 2654 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLV, §4504(c), formerly Pub. L. 107–107, div. C, title XXXI, §3152(c), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1377, renumbered Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLV, §4504(c), and amended Pub. L. 108–136, div. C, title XXXI, §3141(h)(5)(A), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1772, provided that the repeal of this section is effective 30 days after the Secretary of Energy submits to the Committees on Armed Services and Appropriations of Senate and House of Representatives the Secretary's certification that the final rule for the new counterintelligence polygraph program required by section 2654(a) of this title has been fully implemented (Such certifications were submitted Oct. 31, 2006.).
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. SPITZER MOTOR SALES, Inc.

No. 203, Docket 22853.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued March 10, 1954.

Decided March 24, 1954.

Melvin Pollack, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Samuel M. Singer, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for petitioner.

Arthur Kaplan, New York City, for respondent.

Before CLARK, MEDINA, and HARLAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The objections raised to enforcement of the order of the National Labor Relations Board against this respondent rest entirely upon disputed issues of fact which the Board, making its own findings, 102 N.L.R.B. 437, has resolved in a careful and discriminating manner fully supported by the evidence. The assertions by respondent in oral argument as to some late agreement of adjustment with the complaining union present no issue for us on this proceeding. National Labor Relations Board v. Mexia Textile Mills, 339 U.S. 563, 567-568, 70 S.Ct. 833, 94 L.Ed. 1067; National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aircraft Corp., 2 Cir., 206 F.2d 235, 238; National Labor Relations Board v. General Motors Corp., 2 Cir., 179 F.2d 221. 222.

An order of enforcement will issue.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council

          - [Docket No: 112102020-1111-01]

# AGENCY:

Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council (GCERC).

# ACTION:

Notice of Performance Review Board (PRB) appointments.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the members of the Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance Review Board. The PRB is comprised of a Chairperson and a mix of state representatives and career senior executives that meet annually to review and evaluate performance appraisal documents and provide a written recommendation to the Chairperson of the Council for final approval of each executive's performance rating, performance-based pay adjustment, and performance award.

# DATES:

The board membership is applicable beginning on 12/01/2020 and ending on 12/31/21.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary C. Pleffner, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Assistance, Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council, telephone 813-394-2185.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the persons named below have been selected to serve on the PRB:

## Department of Interior

                    Blanchard, Mary Josie, Deputy Director, Environmental Protection                           ( print page 81475)                        Compliance, MaryJosie_                    *Blanchard@ios.doi.gov*, 202-208-3406.                

## State of Alabama

                    Blankenship, Christopher, Commissioner of Conservation and Natural Resources,                     *Chris.blankenship@dcnr.alabama.gov*, 334-242-3486.                

## Environmental Protection Agency

                    Wyatt, Marc, Director, Gulf of Mexico Division,                     *Wyatt.marc@epa.gov*, 228-679-5915.                

## State of Texas

                    Baker, Toby, Texas Commission of Environmental Quality,                     *Toby.Baker@tceq.texas.gov*, 512-239-5515.                

Keala Hughes,

Director of External Affairs & Tribal Relations, Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council.

[FR Doc. 2020-27617 Filed 12-15-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-58-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             565
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,534
<ALLOWANCES>                                       360
<INVENTORY>                                      9,020
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,148
<PP&E>                                          49,160
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,862
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,569
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,881
<BONDS>                                            659
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,167
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,613
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    53,569
<SALES>                                         46,877
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,877
<CGS>                                           35,352
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,352
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 416
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    611
<INCOME-TAX>                                       139
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                472
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       472
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
        

</TABLE>
§ 57.14115 Stationary grinding machines. Stationary grinding machines, other than special bit grinders, shall be equipped with— ( a ) Peripheral hoods capable of withstanding the force of a bursting wheel and enclosing not less than 270°—of the periphery of the wheel;
( b ) Adjustable tool rests set so that the distance between the grinding surface of the wheel and the tool rest is not greater than 1 ⁄ 8 inch; and
( c ) A safety washer on each side of the wheel.
[53 FR 32528, Aug. 25, 1988; 53 FR 44588, Nov. 4, 1988]
§ 71.404 Application for waiver of surface facilities requirements. ( a ) Application for waivers of any requirements of §§ 71.400 through 71.402 shall be in writing, filed with the appropriate Coal Mine Health and Safety District Manager, and shall contain the following information: ( 1 ) The name and address of the mine operator,
( 2 ) The name and location of the mine, and
( 3 ) A detailed statement of the grounds upon which the waiver is requested and the period of time for which it is requested.
( b ) At the same time the application is sent to the District Manager, a copy of the application shall be forwarded to the appropriate Regional Program Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health by the operator, and a copy showing the addresses of the appropriate District Manager and Regional Program Director shall be posted by the operator for at least 30 days on the mine bulletin board required by section 107(a) of the Act.
#### NIAGARA COUNTY, Respondent, v. FIDELITY & DEPOSIT CO., Appellant, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November 24, 1903.)

Action by the County of Niagara against the Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, impleaded with John C. Lammerts.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Robert E. Sulentic, certify that:

1.                I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trammell Crow Company;

2.                Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)                Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)               Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)                Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of  theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a)                All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)               Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: November 9, 2004 | /s/ ROBERT E. SULENTIC     |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------|
|                        | Robert E.  Sulentic        |
| * *                    | *Chief Executive  Officer* |

 

 

----
### l^t^v Lb/k, g|,032-01/02. Dpo-be: Acfoo iajowuo Lite Id &^ue^"T TV^r iWc Sudio/^£ -£xrio*j 4 O^ WcM. pttrr^^ /oonFy lAAtr of TlrHr

A kJ

_ _ ^ - - N MOTIONfil8M)88pD - - ' ' i )4-^-7^^ TDCX

RECEIVED IN COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS APR 13 2015 AbelAcoStei,Cl8irk71 1Vk t0TMr or tHM/ju*c 

### CM<»^#0-0S-C&. 060%.a&?A 'trrer 0*3e* Murray Unir /*j CKr?^^J,iS, -t-r 

### K-A~p r^e^eA ^-W*, ^o.s ,0 ceu^rioO ^0 

### if" /u^ac^o to od -* fey -rn,* t*v*.T umw+
m* -M&f&r Mot?o«& //v T7f^& Pfpimu. Ar^o cowttwt *7L AT-Thfer 'frvoz&^s, R>&zjno .ThwitlJ^/



### 0 Q-Prun o/z Av/&/<^ 

### Ho)*' rwcj 5 OF CeimilUAC frf>pbALS OF TteXA-S 

### wjpkc/wr -P|2o Sr 

## p*to-t>er ^iuO (ZoSpD^r^c^ mo**. TtRs copierA**> 

## Aaotlo'ajs* THC (Wh o£ (kVvumtl appeals op ^a/^ p^c^Lr f^c^/v^ e^^tnoar ,* Ibcr^ c^- U^ ^ IAJ rWCT| ^^^ p^,fe Tt^T TVHS