alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
item# Name Part Number Part Description Qty

Front side of the board

1 20 PIN PCB board connector 1

2 22 PIN PCB board connector 1

3 C1 10FK 2AN 1

4 C2 22HFK 5GD 1

5 C3 47HFK 6U7 1

6 IC1 MC9S12DG128 CFUE 1L59W QMZXD0708

7 IC2,3,4

AQW210 

623 M LOGO 3

8 IC5 250 B71 Silver 1

9 IC6

B82790

S513 N

G325 EPCOS 1

10 IC7 35451 57T EC41 2

11 IC8 53E4VJKQ4LM22A4 1

12 IC9

IPS041L

IR620 1

13 IC10

L0613

4N35 2

14 IC11

L052

4N33

15 IC12 601636 1

16 IC13 FS8.000P 1

17 IC14

606

SS 21 1

18 IC15

7805BG

AU610 1

19 T1

NML0512SC

G0706i C&D TECHNOLOGIES 1

Other side of the board
Piece Cost Material Supplier (if available)

Commodity Pricing 67719

Commodity Pricing 300435

Commodity Pricing

Commodity Pricing

Commodity Pricing

Commodity Pricing

Commodity Pricing

Commodity Pricing

Commodity Pricing

Commodity Pricing

Commodity Pricing

Commodity Pricing

Commodity Pricing

Commodity Pricing

Commodity Pricing

Commodity Pricing

Commodity Pricing

Commodity Pricing

Commodity Pricing
### §47502. Noise measurement and exposure systems and identifying land use compatible with noise exposure

After consultation with the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency and United States Government, State, and interstate agencies that the Secretary of Transportation considers appropriate, the Secretary shall by regulation—

(1) establish a single system of measuring noise that—

(A) has a highly reliable relationship between projected noise exposure and surveyed reactions of individuals to noise; and

(B) is applied uniformly in measuring noise at airports and the surrounding area;

(2) establish a single system for determining the exposure of individuals to noise resulting from airport operations, including noise intensity, duration, frequency, and time of occurrence; and

(3) identify land uses normally compatible with various exposures of individuals to noise.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1284.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 47502 | 49 App.:2102. | Feb. 18, 1980, Pub. L. 96–193, §102, 94 Stat. 50. |

Section

In this section, before clause (1), the words "Not later than the last day of the twelfth month which begins after February 18, 1980" are omitted as obsolete.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9487 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9487

 To amend the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1970 to authorize the 
 Legislative Counsel of the House of Representatives to designate more 
than one of the attorneys of the Office of the Legislative Counsel as a 
          Deputy Legislative Counsel, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 6, 2024

  Mr. Steil introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1970 to authorize the 
 Legislative Counsel of the House of Representatives to designate more 
than one of the attorneys of the Office of the Legislative Counsel as a 
          Deputy Legislative Counsel, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``House Office of Legislative Counsel 
Modernization Act''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF MULTIPLE DEPUTY LEGISLATIVE COUNSELS.

    (a) Designation.--Section 522(b)(1) of the Legislative 
Reorganization Act of 1970 (2 U.S.C. 282a(b)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by amending the first sentence to read as follows: 
        ``The Legislative Counsel shall designate one or more of the 
        attorneys appointed under subsection (a) as a Deputy 
        Legislative Counsel.''; and
            (2) in the second sentence, by striking ``the Deputy 
        Legislative Counsel shall perform the functions of the 
        Legislative Counsel.'' and inserting ``the functions of the 
        Legislative Counsel shall be performed by a Deputy Legislative 
        Counsel. If there is more than one Deputy Legislative Counsel, 
        the Deputy Legislative Counsel who shall perform such functions 
        shall be determined in accordance with the order specified in a 
        notice filed with the Speaker and the Minority Leader of the 
        House by the Legislative Counsel.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 522(b)(2) of such Act (2 U.S.C. 
282a(b)(2)) is amended by striking ``Deputy Legislative Counsel'' and 
inserting ``Deputy Legislative Counsels''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 57.19134 Sheaves.

Sheaves in operating shafts shall be inspected weekly and kept properly lubricated.
# C_2023206EN.01001201.xml

| 13.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/12

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.11142 – Brookfield / Triton)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 206/08)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Brookfield Corporation (Canada), |
| --- | --- |

—

Brookfield Corporation (Canada),

| — | Triton International Limited (‘Triton’, Bermuda). |
| --- | --- |

—

Triton International Limited (‘Triton’, Bermuda).

Brookfield Corporation will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Triton.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | Brookfield Corporation (formerly known as Brookfield Asset Management Inc.), a global owner and operator of real assets across industries, including renewable power and transition, infrastructure, private equity, real estate, credit, and insurance solutions. Brookfield Corporation generally invests across three businesses: asset management, insurance solutions, and operating businesses. |
| --- | --- |

—

Brookfield Corporation (formerly known as Brookfield Asset Management Inc.), a global owner and operator of real assets across industries, including renewable power and transition, infrastructure, private equity, real estate, credit, and insurance solutions. Brookfield Corporation generally invests across three businesses: asset management, insurance solutions, and operating businesses.

| — | Triton is a company active in the acquisition, leasing, re-leasing and subsequent sale of intermodal containers and container chassis for seaborne transport. |
| --- | --- |

—

Triton is a company active in the acquisition, leasing, re-leasing and subsequent sale of intermodal containers and container chassis for seaborne transport.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.11142 – Brookfield / Triton

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 12


                       DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE, INC.
         STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                        (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR RATIO)




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   FOR THE YEARS ENDED
                                     -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           1993            1994            1995            1996            1997
                                     --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
<S>                                   <C>              <C>              <C>               <C>              <C>
Earnings:
 Income before provision for income
  taxes                                $   302,000     $   205,000     $   298,500     $   473,800     $   661,100
Add: Fixed Charges
 Interest expense (gross)                1,465,303       2,116,655       2,699,769       2,865,800       4,012,209
 Interest factor in rents                   15,432          18,565          22,064          25,515          29,978
                                       -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------
 Total fixed charges                     1,480,735       2,135,220       2,721,833       2,891,315       4,042,187
Earnings before fixed charges, and
 provision for income taxes            $ 1,782,735     $ 2,340,220     $ 3,020,333     $ 3,365,115     $ 4,703,287
                                       ===========     ===========     ===========     ===========     ===========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges            1.20            1.10            1.11            1.16            1.16
                                       ===========     ===========     ===========     ===========     ===========



<CAPTION>
                                       FOR THE NINE
                                       MONTHS ENDED
                                     ---------------
                                         9/30/98
                                     ---------------
<S>                                  <C>
Earnings:
 Income before provision for income
  taxes                                $   489,350
Add: Fixed Charges
 Interest expense (gross)                3,469,822
 Interest factor in rents                   27,409
                                       -----------
 Total fixed charges                     3,497,231
Earnings before fixed charges, and
 provision for income taxes            $ 3,986,581
                                       ===========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges            1.14
                                       ===========
</TABLE>
4300

4800

4600

4500

4700

4500

4500

4800

4700

4800

4100

4100

4500

4200

4400

4300

4100

4400

4700

4700

4500

4450

4900

4600

4500

4700

4400

4400

4100

4600

4100

4600

4700

4300

4100

4600

4200

4400

4800

4600

4600

4700

4700

4500

4400

4300

9

9

9

9

9

C O U N T Y R D -A 0 0 2C O U N T Y R D -A 0 0 2

9

9

9

9

9

C O U N T Y R D -A 0 0 2C O U N T Y R D -A 0 0 2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS

Guzmans

Lookout

Mountain

WEST

POTRILLO

MOU

NTAINS

Potrillo

Peak

Guzmans

Lookout

Mountain

Camel

Mountain

P O L

Ranch

Mount

Riley

Mount

Riley SE

2 98

310

97

35

35

2 98

30"

16

35

97

30"

10' 107°

30"

94

2

35

52'

15

35

89

17

35

35

2

FEET

16

330

93

96

3520

2

35

FEET

000m

35

90

E

1

50'

1

35

92

2 31°

50'

25

2 2

19

22

31° 2

35

88

35

24

19

92

17

35

000m

000 FEET

96

26

35

22

2

000 FEET

95

000m

15'

45'

000m

N

2 52'

35

2

23

35

2

35

107°

47'

E

360

000

31°

18

07' 89

107°

30" 88

35

31°

27

20

35

30"

35

35

18

28

35

24

45'

47'

25

21

07'

12'

35

30"

23

35

90

000

3527

2

30"

94

28

N

21

2

30"

35

2 2

93 2

107°

26

12'

280

2

15' 10'

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

NEW MEXICO

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

GUZMANS LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN, NM-CHH

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

GUZMANS LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN QUADRANGLE

NEW MEXICO-CHIHUAHUA

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 13R

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: New Mexico Coordinate System of 1983

(central zone)

Imagery................................NAIP, January 2005 - July 2009

Roads..............................................©2006-2010 Tele Atlas

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2005

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2001

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.5.11

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

1° 9 ́

20 MILS

9° 14 ́

164 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

13R

BR

CONTOUR INTERVAL 20 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 11, 2009

0831 

# Order

September 11, 2009

138690

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138690 COA: 289907 Wayne CC: 07-015368 COREY MELVIN LONG, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 20, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
----

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 4, 2011 |   /s/ John M. Lowber         |
|-------------------|-----------------------------------|
|              | John M. Lowber                    |
|              | Secretary, Treasurer and Director |
|              | GCI, Inc.                         |

----
ffi wrtorrrE vtEWtNG AT tTS BEST

Keep yout eyes open aiiC ycur ltnoculars handy Lrhen yorr

visit Blan(a \&etlands. The mosalc ct u"'et.:nd ard upland

hab tats s.rpoorts a var ety of r,rildiiie. ts a rca V/eilands host

!!alerio\,,/l ard shcfell rds by the tn0!sands clurinq nesttirg

and miEfatror per:ods. Ptntaii ard nra lard {tuck5, teai,

Ianada geese, phaaropes, sando pers, .]vocets efC \^ih te,

faced rbis are among the bifds contnto:t1y seen on ihe

,,rretiancis. Yeilor'v headed blackbirCs and other songbrrds

r,rnabit dense vegetalion a onq the edLtes oJ the \,r'etlands.

The aburdarce of fooC anri cc\/-el aso aiiracis coyctes,

rabb ts, and other manrmais.

Please respect

r,vr dlite. 0bserve

ar.limals lfom a

distance - use

binocu ars, spotting

scopes and te ephoto

lenses. ilove s o,v y

and not d rertly el

an mais.

For more irifolntaton

about Blanca

tvet ands please

c0nlarI:

Bureau of !-and Management

La Jara Field Office

15571 County Rd T5

La Jara, Colorado 81'140

(7 19) 27 4-897 1

www.blm.gov/co

t

I

I 6t' \

(;{l .,.!. 6:!: :io,r - 

_,5r 15r i!002 RErri Nr E
&f

\t

@

;;;\

-43r

American Avocel, lllustralion

LEGEND

U\ Accessible Troil& Fishing

Wellond Sile

I ri n cono,

- 

Public Roods

" "' Troib

lll Restrooms

4ff *o,"noo,. *iro,n" o,.o

P,TRKING AREAS

El*,

@ ruortn Honter

@lex"ri

@] wot.nout" wirotir.

@] snip.

@l lortn ucrroro

E] south luollord

F-1 mile ---{
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc., a Delaware
      corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), J. Scott
      Womble, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


*/s/
                J. Scott Womble*J.
                Scott Womble
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              August
                14, 2008
### §1421j. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated annually by the Congress of the United States such sums as may be necessary and appropriate to carry out the provisions and purposes of this chapter.

(Aug. 1, 1950, ch. 512, §32, 64 Stat. 392.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Elimination of General Fund Deficits of Guam and Virgin Islands

For authorization of appropriations for assistance to the governments of Guam and the Virgin Islands in elimination of general fund deficits, see Pub. L. 96–597, title VI, §607, Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3483, set out as a note under section 1641 of this title.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D. C.

We hereby consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of our
report dated January 15, 1999, on our audit of the consolidated financial
statements of Citizens Financial Corp. as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1998, appearing in Part
II, Item 8 of the 1998 Form 10-K of Citizens Financial Corp.


                                                 ARNETT & FOSTER, P.L.L.C.


Charleston, West Virginia
March 10, 1999
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

DAVID JOHNSON,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

No. 96-7867

MICHAEL MOORE, Director; CHARLES

M. CONDON, Attorney General for

the State of South Carolina,

Respondents-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.

Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge; Margaret B. Seymour,

Magistrate Judge.

(CA-96-187-4-20BE)

Submitted: August 29, 1997

Decided: September 17, 1997

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,

Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

David Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

David Johnson appeals from the district court's order adopting the

report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his

request for habeas relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2254 (West 1994

& Supp. 1997). Johnson also appeals the denial of his motion for

reconsideration. The district court found that Johnson's petition contained both exhausted and unexhausted claims. The court dismissed

the unexhausted claim without prejudice and denied the exhausted

claims on the merits. When, however, a habeas petition contains both

exhausted and unexhausted claims the district court must dismiss the

entire petition without prejudice. Rose v. Lundy , 455 U.S. 509, 522

(1982). The petitioner may then either resubmit a petition containing

only the exhausted claims or exhaust all claims in state court and then

file a new petition. Id. at 520.

Accordingly, the district court's order is vacated, and the case is

remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. We

grant a certificate of probable cause to appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED

 2
----

|   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|

----

----

----

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11-22

                               DTE ENERGY COMPANY
                      BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                 OF COMMON STOCK


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                         Three Months Ended March 31, 2001
                                                                                      ---------------------------------------
                                                                                       (Thousands, except per share amounts)
<S>                                                                                   <C>
BASIC:
     Net Income ................................................................                      $138,392
     Weighted average number of common
       shares outstanding (a) ..................................................                       141,872
     Earnings per share of Common Stock
       based on weighted average number
       of shares outstanding ...................................................                      $   0.98

DILUTED:
     Net Income ................................................................                      $138,392

     Weighted average number of common
       shares outstanding (a) ..................................................                       141,872
     Incremental shares from assumed exercise
       of options ..............................................................                           325
                                                                                                      --------
                                                                                                       142,197
                                                                                                      ========
    Earnings per share of Common Stock
       assuming exercise of options ............................................                      $   0.97
</TABLE>
---------------------
(a) Based on a daily average.