alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, William B. Kretzmer, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MAI SystemsCorporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisannual report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)             designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisannual report is being prepared;

 

b)            evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of adate within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the“Evaluation Date”); and

 

c)             presented in thisannual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

** **

a)             all significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any materialweaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)            any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated inthis annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internalcontrols or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controlssubsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any correctiveactions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 
|   | Date:  March 24, 2004 | By: | /s/  William B. Kretzmer |
|--------|----------------------------|-----|--------------------------|
|   | William B. Kretzmer        |
|   | Chief Executive Officer    |

 

----
#### § 57.5039 Maximum permissible concentration.

Except as provided by standard § 57.5005, persons shall not be exposed to air containing concentrations of radon daughters exceeding 1.0 WL in active workings.
§ 710.4 Responsibility. ( a ) Under the general direction of the Assistant Secretary, Energy and Minerals, the Director is responsible for administering the initial regulatory program established by the Secretary.
( b ) The States are responsible for issuing permits and inspection and enforcement on lands on which operations are regulated by a State to insure compliance with the initial performance standards in parts 715 through 718 of this chapter. States are required to file copies of inspection reports with the Office. States are also responsible for assuring that permits are not issued which would be in conflict with the restriction on mining found in section 510 of the Act, particularly in regard to alluvial valley floors and prime farm lands, and section 522(e) of the Act in regard to prohibitions of mining on certain lands.
§ 285.103 When may BSEE prescribe or approve departures from the regulations in this part? ( a ) BSEE may prescribe or approve departures from the provisions of this part when departures are necessary because the applicable provision(s) as applied to a specific circumstance: ( 1 ) Are impractical or unduly burdensome and the departure is necessary to achieve the intended objectives of the renewable energy program;
( 2 ) Fail to conserve the natural resources of the OCS;
( 3 ) Fail to protect life (including human and wildlife), property, or the marine, coastal, or human environment; or
( 4 ) Fail to protect sites, structures, or objects of historical or archaeological significance.
( b ) Any departure approved under this section and its rationale must: ( 1 ) Be consistent with subsection 8(p) of the OCS Lands Act;
( 2 ) Protect the environment and the public health and safety to the same degree as if there was no approved departure from the regulations;
( 3 ) Not impair the rights of third parties; and
( 4 ) Be documented in writing. [88 FR 6413, Jan. 31, 2023, as amended at 89 FR 42713, May 15, 2024]
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 USC SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: August 8, 2006
    /s/ ANTHONY F. EARLEY, JR.Anthony F. Earley, Jr.Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of The Detroit Edison Company
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                     /s/ Brian Gallagher                Brian                  GallagherChairman                  of the Board (Acting Principal Financial Officer) |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|   | Date:                  April 17, 2006                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |

----
#### § 402.2 Delegation of authority.

The Water-Resources Research Program and the Water-Resources Technology Development Program, as authorized by sections 105 and 106 of the Act (42 U.S.C. 10304 and 10305), have been established as components of the USGS. The Secretary of the Interior has delegated to the Director of the USGS authority to take actions and make the determinations that, under the Act, are the responsibility of the Secretary.
### §1954. Public auditor and special prosecutor

(a) 1 Upon request of the Government of Palau the President shall provide, on a nonreimbursable basis, appropriate technical assistance to the public auditor or special prosecutor. The assistance provided pursuant to this subsection for the first five years after the effective date of the Compact shall, upon the request of the Government of Palau, and to the extent personnel are available, include (but not be limited to) the full time services of—

(1) an auditor or accountant, as determined by the public auditor, for the office of public auditor; and

(2) an attorney or investigator, as determined by the special prosecutor, for the office of special prosecutor.

(Pub. L. 101–219, title I, §104, Dec. 12, 1989, 103 Stat. 1871.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

For Oct. 1, 1994, as the effective date of the Compact, referred to in text, see Proc. No. 6726, Sept. 27, 1994, 59 F.R. 49777, set out as a note under section 1931 of this title.

#### Codification

Section was formerly set out as a note under section 1681 of this title.

1 So in original. No subsec. (b) has been enacted.
#### § 733.14 Factors to be considered in deciding whether to substitute Federal enforcement for State programs or to withdraw approval of State programs.

The record of the State in fulfilling the conditions of the original approval or adjusting to new circumstances, in accordance with requirements of the Act and this chapter, the hearings transcripts, written presentations and comments shall be considered in evaluating the maintenance, administration, or enforcement of a State program for purposes of determining whether to substitute direct Federal enforcement of the State program or to withdraw approval of part or all of the program.

[44 FR 15328, Mar. 13, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 26366, June 17, 1982. Redesignated at 85 FR 75189, Nov. 24, 2020]
M. P. No. 77-130.

#### Robert Brimmer *et al. v.*Shirley A. McCanna *et al.*

*Lovett & Linder, Ltd., Richard Bruce Feinstein, Warren R. Wolf,*for petitioners.

*Pasquale T. Annarummo,*Town Solicitor, for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                        OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                  9,397
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                          25,583
<ALLOWANCES>                           (1,063)
<INVENTORY>                            32,480
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       70,414
<PP&E>                                 35,043
<DEPRECIATION>                        (22,389)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         98,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  21,130
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                  329
<OTHER-SE>                             58,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           98,062
<SALES>                                36,333
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       36,333
<CGS>                                  21,722
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          34,038
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          151
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        298
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         1,846
<INCOME-TAX>                              691
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     1,155
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                            1,155
<EPS-BASIC>                              0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.17



</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.1712-2 Location of surface facilities.

Bathhouses, change rooms, and sanitary toilet facilities shall be in a location convenient for the use of the miners. Where such facilities are designed to serve more than one mine, they shall be centrally located so as to be as convenient for the use of the miners in all the mines served by such facilities.
Exhibit 32-55
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: April 28, 2010
    
    /S/ ANTHONY F. EARLEY, JR.Anthony F. Earley, Jr.Chairman of the Board and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of The Detroit Edison Company
----

| Entity                                   | Jurisdiction of Organization | Name Under Which Subsidiary Does Business                                               |
|------------------------------------------|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Alaska United Fiber System Partnership   | Alaska                       | Alaska United Fiber System Partnership, Alaska United Fiber System, Alaska United  |
| GCI Communication Corp.                  | Alaska                       | GCI, GCC, GCICC, GCI Communication Corp.                                           |
| GCI Cable, Inc.                          | Alaska                       | GCI Cable, GCI Cable, Inc.                                                         |
| GCI Holdings, Inc.                       | Alaska                       | GCI Holdings, Inc.                                                                 |
| Potter View Development Co., Inc.        | Alaska                       | Potter View Development Co., Inc.                                                  |
| GCI Fiber Communication, Co., Inc.  | Alaska                       | GCI Fiber Communication, Co., Inc., GFCC,  Kanas                         |
| Unicom, Inc.                             | Alaska                       | Unicom, Inc., Unicom                                                                    |
| United-KUC, Inc.                         | Alaska                       | United-KUC, Inc., United-KUC, KUC                                                       |
| United Utilities, Inc.                   | Alaska                       | United Utilities, Inc. United Utilities, UUI                                            |

----
#### WANAMAKER et al., Appellants, v. MEGRAW, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 10, 1905.)

Action by John Wanamaker and others against Robert H. Megraw. L. Frankel, for appellants. L. Daily, for respondent. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
<PAGE>   1


                                                             EXHIBIT 12-25

                           THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             Six
                                                            Months               Year Ended December 31
                                                            Ended         ------------------------------------
                                                            6/30/00        1999            1998            1997
                                                            -------        ----            ----            ----
                                                                       (Millions, except for ratio)
<S>                                                     <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>

Net income.............................................   $     188    $     434      $      418      $    417
                                                          ---------    ---------      ----------      --------

Taxes based on income:
   Income taxes........................................         101          211             260           288
   Municipal and state.................................           1            3               3             4
                                                          ---------    ---------      ----------      --------
     Total taxes based on income.......................         102          214             263           292
                                                          ---------    ---------      ----------      --------

Fixed charges:
   Interest expense....................................         139          284             278           282
   Allowance for funds used during
     construction......................................           -            4               -             -
   Interest factor of rents............................          17           34              34            34
                                                          ---------    ---------      ----------      --------
     Total fixed charges...............................         156          322             312           316
                                                          =========    =========      ==========      ========

Earnings before taxes based on income
   and fixed charges...................................   $     446    $     970      $      933      $  1,025
                                                          =========    =========      ==========      ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                             2.86         3.01            3.18          3.24
</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of RADA Electronic Industries Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Shiri Lazarovich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/ Shiri Lazarovich*Shiri LazarovichChief Financial Officer





Date: March 25, 2010




*           The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Company’s offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
Exhibit 32-64
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: April 27, 2011
    
    /S/ DAVID E. MEADOR

David E. MeadorExecutive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of The Detroit Edison Company
BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

_____________________________________

Application of

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

for renewal of exemption and certificate authorities

_____________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Dockets DOT-OST-1997-2653 DOT-OST-2001-10172 DOT-OST-2001-9314 DOT-OST-2005-20145 DOT-OST-2005-22228 DOT-OST-2006-23526 DOT-OST-2007-26805 DOT-OST-2009-0186 DOT-OST-2010-0089 DOT-OST-2010-0095 DOT-OST-2010-0133 DOT-OST-2010-0176 DOT-OST-2010-0196 DOT-OST-2010-0230 DOT-OST-2011-0065 DOT-OST-2011-0110

MOTION OF DELTA AIR LINES, INC. FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW

Communications with respect to this document should be addressed to:

Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director, Government Affairs & Associate General Counsel Jeff Morgan Regional Director, Government Affairs DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 1212 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 842-4184 sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

September 21, 2011BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

_____________________________________

Application of

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

for renewal of exemption and certificate authorities

_____________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Dockets DOT-OST-1997-2653 DOT-OST-2001-10172 DOT-OST-2001-9314 DOT-OST-2005-20145 DOT-OST-2005-22228 DOT-OST-2006-23526 DOT-OST-2007-26805 DOT-OST-2009-0186 DOT-OST-2010-0089 DOT-OST-2010-0095 DOT-OST-2010-0133 DOT-OST-2010-0176 DOT-OST-2010-0196 DOT-OST-2010-0230 DOT-OST-2011-0065 DOT-OST-2011-0110

MOTION OF DELTA AIR LINES, INC. FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW

Delta Air Lines, Inc. requests leave to withdraw its omnibus renewal application,

filed yesterday in the above-captioned dockets.

Respectfully submitted,

_________________________________ Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director, Government Affairs & Associate General Counsel DELTA AIR LINES, INC.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

On this 21th day of September, 2011, a copy of the foregoing was served by electronic mail on the following:

anbird@fedex.com anita.mosner@hklaw.com ben.graves@evergreenairlines.com benjamin.slocum@usairways.com bill@mietuslaw.com bob.kneisley@wnco.com Brian.Gillman@mesa-air.com BTHunt@pncl.com carl.nelson@aa.com cdonley@ssd.com dan.weiss@coair.com dhainbach@ggh-airlaw.com dkirstein@yklaw.com Dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil efaberman@wileyrein.com Esta.rosenberg@dot.gov gmurphy@crowell.com gwhite@lac.lynden.com howard_kass@usairways.com info@airlineinfo.com jegillick@zsrlaw.com jhill@dowlohnes.com john.allen@faa.gov John.Fredericksen@suncountry.com john.palo@evergreenairlines.com jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com judy@lynden.com jyoung@yklaw.com kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com lhalloway@crowell.com matwood@cozen.com mcmillin@woa.com mlbenge@zsrlaw.com mroller@rollerbauer.com mrosia@pncl.com msinick@ssd.com mwiegele@nac.aero patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com pdoell@naca.cc pmurphy@lopmurphy.com ranjit.seth@evergreenairlines.com robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com robert.land@jetblue.com rpommer@atlasair.com rpriddy@naca.cc rsilverberg@sgbdc.com russell.bailey@alpa.org slachter@lachter-clements.com sllunsford@fedex.com temerson@skywest.com thomas.bolling@united.com TZoeller@naca.cc urskr@state.gov
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.1003-1 Other requirements for guarding of trolley wires and trolley feeder wires.

Adequate precaution shall be taken to insure that equipment being moved along haulageways will not come in contact with trolley wires or trolley feeder wires.