alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsUsing and Distributing Spaceflight Data: The Johnson Space Center Life Sciences Data ArchiveLife sciences data collected before, during and after spaceflight are valuable and often irreplaceable. The Johnson Space Center Life is hard to find, and much of the data (e.g. Sciences Data Archive has been designed to provide researchers, engineers, managers and educators interactive access to information about and data from human spaceflight experiments. The archive system consists of a Data Acquisition System, Database Management System, CD-ROM Mastering System and Catalog Information System (CIS). The catalog information system is the heart of the archive. The CIS provides detailed experiment descriptions (both written and as QuickTime movies), hardware descriptions, hardware images, documents, and data. An initial evaluation of the archive at a scientific meeting showed that 88% of those who evaluated the catalog want to use the system when completed. The majority of the evaluators found the archive flexible, satisfying and easy to use. We conclude that the data archive effectively provides key life sciences data to interested users.Document ID19960052965Acquisition SourceJohnson Space CenterDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsCardenas, J. A.*(NASA Johnson Space Center Houston, TX United States)*Buckey, J. C.*(Texas Univ. Houston, TX United States)*Turner, J. N.*(Martin Marietta Corp. Houston, TX United States)*White, T. S.*(Martin Marietta Corp. Houston, TX United States)*Havelka,J. A.*(Martin Marietta Corp. Houston, TX United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 5, 1995Subject CategoryDocumentation And Information ScienceReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-111626AIAA Paper 95-1045NAS 1.15: 111626Meeting InformationMeeting: Life Sciences and Space MedicineLocation: Houston, TXCountry: United StatesStart Date: April 3, 1995End Date: April 5, 1995Accession Number96N35926Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19960052965.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
AAM

- 1 3

- 3 6 4

- E June 06, 2013

Exemption No. 1079 2

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 20 1 3

- 0 409

Mr. Byron DeVries

ApexHeli Oregon, Inc.

89060 Condon Creek Road

Florence, OR 97439

Dear M r

. DeVries :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption,

including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter d ated April 2 5 , 2013 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on

behalf of ApexHeli Oregon, Inc. (ApexHeli) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code

of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow ApexHeli to cover its safety

sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program

.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and an y delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to ApexHeli

.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA

fo und that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two drug and alcohol testing

programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an eq uivalent level of

safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was

unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that

—

• they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant

of Exemption No. 9703 ;

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also

apply to the situation you present; and

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator

has delegated to me, I hereby grant ApexHeli Oregon, Inc. an exemption from 14 CFR

part 120 to the ex tent necessary to allow ApexHeli to cover its safety

- sensitive employees

under one drug and alcohol testing program , subj ect to the conditions and limitations

described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of ApexHeli are subject to the drug and a lcohol regulations at all times

while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the same auspices of

the ApexHeli part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on June 30 , 2 01 6 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

James R. Fraser, M.D.

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
# C_2023174EN.01001301.xml

| 16.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/13

---

Special report 12/2023

‘EU supervision of banks’ credit risk – The ECB stepped up its efforts but more is needed to increase assurance that credit risk is properly managed and covered’

(2023/C 174/10)

The European Court of Auditors has published its special report 12/2023: ‘EU supervision of banks’ credit risk – The ECB stepped up its efforts but more is needed to increase assurance that credit risk is properly managed and covered’.

The report can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/publications/sr-2023-12

---
#### The People of the State of New York v. Nouriel Aryeh.

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted to the extent and on the terms and conditions contained in the order of this court filed herein. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.
#### REICHENBERG v. INTERURBAN ST. RY. CO.

(Supreme Court,. Appellate Term.

November 6, 1903.)

1. Street Railways—Regligence —Collision with Wagon — Evidence— Sufficiency.

In an action against a street car company for personal injuries caused ■ by a collision between defendant’s car and plaintiff’s wagon, it appeared that the wagon was being driven in front of the car, and turned out apparently to allow the car to pass, but when the car was about to do so for some reason turned towards the track so. that it was struck. The driver turned to avoid an approaching vehicle, but it did not appear how far away this vehicle was. *.Held*not sufficient to support a finding that defendant was negligent.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Tenth District.

Action by Dena Reichenberg against the Inter urban Street Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed.

*524Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and BISCHOFF and BLANCHARD, JJ.

J. Ralph Hilton and Wm. E. Weaver, for appellant.

I. Henry Harris and Leon Kronfeld, for respondent.

BISCHOFF, J.

The testimony given by the plaintiff’s servant, the sole evidence of the happening of the accident, cannot suffice to support this judgment. Taken in the most favorable view, this evidence simply is that the plaintiff’s wagon was proceeding along the south-bound track in front of a car, going south, and at the car’s signal turned from the south-bound to the north-bound track. The wagon went a little way along the latter track, was then caused to be deflected in its course, and for some reason the shaft was struck by the car, which had followed and was evidently passing it. The wagon had cleared the south-bound track, and there is no explanation of the change in its course other than that, somewhere ahead, a wagon was coming along the north-bound track toward it. Presumably the driver of the plaintiff’s wagon wished to avoid the approaching vehicle,.but why he chose to turn directly in the path of the car which was just behind him, and which he had immediately before given space to pass him, is purely a matter of conjecture. We are not informed how far away the approaching wagon was, and, while the condition of the street restricted this driver to one of the two tracks at the point, there is nothing to show the necessity for his attempt to leave the north-bound tract at the very moment when the south-bound car was passing. There is no basis, upon these meager facts, for an inference that the defendant’s servants could or should have foreseen the change in the wagon’s course, and guarded against it, or for a finding that reasonable prudence was used by the plaintiff’s servant in relying upon some different management of the car. As the case is presented, the defendant’s negligence depends upon a resort to surmise of facts which the record distinctly omits.

Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

AEC Annual Energy Consumption AEO Annual Energy Outlook ANOPR Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking ANSI American National Standards Institute ASHRAE American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Engineers BOM bill of materials BT building technologies BTU British thermal units BVM beverage vending machine CBEC Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey CEC compressor energy consumption CFC chlorofluorocarbons CFR Code of Federal Regulations COGS cost of goods sold CRE commercialrefrigeration equipment CRI color rendering index CMER consumer marginal energy rates CSL candidate standard level DAT discharge air temperature DC direct current DEC daily energy consumption DOE U.S. Department of Energy DOJ U.S. Department of Justice ECM electronically commutated motors EER energy efficiency ratio EHD electro-hydrodynamic EIA Energy Information Administration EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPACT 1992 Energy Policy Act of 1992 EPACT 2005 Energy Policy Act of 2005 EPCA Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 °F degrees Fahrenheit FTC U.S. Federal Trade Commission GRIM Government Regulatory Impact Model HCFC hydrocholorofluorcarbon HFC hydrofluorocarbon INC incremental cost ImSET Impact of Sector Energy Technologies kWh kilowatt hours LCC life-cycle cost LED light emitting diode Low-E low-emissivity LSHX liquid-suction heat exchangers

AA-iAA-ii MPC manufacturing production cost MIA manufacturer impact analysis MLP manufacturer list price MPC manufacturer production cost MSP manufacturer selling price NAICS North American Industry Classification System NEMS National Energy Modeling System NES national energy savings NIA national impact analysis NPV net present value NOPR Notice of Proposed Rulemaking ODP ozone depletion potential PBP payback period PPI producer price indices PSI pounds per square inch PSC permanent split capacitor R&D research and development RTTC Refrigeration and Thermal Test Center RIA regulatory impact analysis SBA U.S. Small Business Administration SCT saturated condenser temperature SEC U.S. Securities Exchange Commission SET saturated evaporator temperature SPM shaded-pole motors TSD Technical Support Document TSL trial standard level USC United States Code W watt WACC weighted-average cost of capital
tt') 

I 

< 

a.. 

< 

:E DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 

PREPARED BY THE 

INSTITUTE OF POLAR STUDIES, OHIO STATE. UNIVERSITY UNDER THE AUSPICES OF THE 

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 

RECONNAISSANCE GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE 

BUCKLEY ISLAND QUADRANGLE, 

TRANSANTARCTIC MOUNTAINS, 

ANTARCTICA 

By 

Peter J. Barrett and David H. Elliot 

U.S. ANTARCTIC RESEARCH PROGRAM 

BUCKLEY ISLAND QUADRANGLE 

ANTARCTIC GEOLOGIC MAP A-3 

30° 

60° 60° 

120° 

!50° WEST !80° EAST 

LOCATION DIAGRAM 

PUBLISHED BY THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20242 

1973 

tp 

> :::0 

:::0 

til 

:I 

> 2 

a 

til 

r 

t: 

0 

"'"'i 

I 

tp 

c: 

() 

~ 

r 

til 

"'( 

en 

r 

> 2 

a 

> 2 

"'"'i 

> :::0 

() 

-1 

() 

> 

t..J 

CJl 

0 

0 

0 

0
§ 72.710T Selection, fit, use, and maintenance of approved respirators. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 28479 , Apr. 18, 2024.
As of April 14, 2025: Approved respirators shall be selected, fitted, used, and maintained in accordance with the provisions of a written respiratory protection program consistent with the requirements of ASTM F3387-19. ASTM F3387-19, *Standard Practice for Respiratory Protection,* approved August 1, 2019, is incorporated by reference into this section with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. This incorporation by reference (IBR) material is available for inspection at the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) and at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Contact MSHA at: MSHA's Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances, 201 12th Street South, Arlington, VA 22202-5450; (202) 693-9440; or any Mine Safety and Health Enforcement District Office. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations* or email *fr.inspection@nara.gov .* The material may be obtained from ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959; *www.astm.org .* [89 FR 28479, Apr. 18, 2024]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM DIONICS, INC.'S  QUARTERLY  REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                         447,400
<SECURITIES>                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                  277,400
<ALLOWANCES>                   0
<INVENTORY>                    441,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               1,178,000
<PP&E>                         1,686,300
<DEPRECIATION>                 1,639,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 1,243,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          763,600
<BONDS>                        758,100
<COMMON>                       38,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          0
<PREFERRED>                    0
<OTHER-SE>                     1,522,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   1,243,700
<SALES>                        864,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               864,500
<CGS>                          609,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  790,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             34,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                48,200
<INCOME-TAX>                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            48,200
<DISCONTINUED>                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                0
<CHANGES>                      0
<NET-INCOME>                   48,200
<EPS-PRIMARY>                  .013
<EPS-DILUTED>                  .013


</TABLE>
### §109. Same; exception of Indians

Nothing in sections 105 and 106 of this title shall be deemed to authorize the levy or collection of any tax on or from any Indian not otherwise taxed.

(July 30, 1947, ch. 389, 61 Stat. 645.)
§ 556.602 What is the primary term of my sulfur lease? ( a ) Your sulfur lease will have a primary term of not more than 10 years, as specified in the lease.
( b ) BOEM will announce the primary term prior to the lease sale.
( c ) The lease will expire at the end of the primary term unless maintained beyond that term in accordance with the provisions of § 556.603.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3487

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain rubber or plastic footwear. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 27, 2005

Mr. RYUN of Kansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain rubber or plastic 

footwear.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN RUBBER OR PLASTIC FOOTWEAR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.64.15 Other footwear with uppers 

of vegetable fibers, other 

than such footwear for men 

or women (provided for in 

subheading 6405.20.30) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 
2

•HR 3487 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### § 57.22607 Blasting on shift (III mines).

When blasting on shift, tests for methane shall be made in the mine atmosphere by a competent person before blasting. Blasting shall not be done when 1.0 percent or more methane is present.
9 Kauj Ruam los Txo Qis Kev Sib Kis Tus Kab Mob Khaus Viv-19 

(COVID-19) Ntawm Cov Neeg Ua Hauj Lwm hauv Cov Chaw Tsim 

Nqaij thiab Tsiaj Muaj Tis, thiab Nqaij Npuas thiab Cov Chaw Ntim

Saib xyuas koj thiab cov neeg ua hauj lwm ib ncig ntawm koj kom muaj kev nyab xeeb. 

Ua raws li cov kauj ruam no txawm hais tias koj tsis muaj cov tsos mob dab tsi ntawm Tus 

Kab Mob Khaus Viv-19 (COVID-19).

OSHA 4054-07 2020 — 9 Steps to Reducing Worker Exposure to COVID-19 in Meat, Poultry, and Pork Processing and Packaging Facilities (Hmong)

Nyob twj ywm hauv tsev 

yog tias koj mob.

➊

Looj cov khoom tiv thaiv rau kev nyab 

xeeb thiab kom txwv tsis txhob kis 

tau tus kab mob vais lav.

➐

 

Zam kev sib sau ua ke 

thaum lub sij hawm so hauj 

lwm, txawm tias nyob sab 

nraud los xij.

➌ Nruab cov thaiv raws cov kab 

tsim khoom kom tswj tau qhov 

kev nyob sib nrug deb.

➍

➎ Zam kev sib koom siv cov cuab yeej thiab 

khoom siv. Nquag ntxuav tu cov cuab yeej 

thiab cov cuab yeej siv uas yuav 

tsum tau sib koom siv kom huv si.

Qhia tej kev txhawj xeeb txog 

kev nyab xeeb thiab kev noj qab 

haus huv rau koj tus thawj saib 

xyuas, los sis rau OSHA.

➑

➏ Siv xab npum thiab dej los 

ntxuav tes.

➋ Tswj kev nyob kom sib nrug deb 

yam tsawg kawg nkaus rau fij 

ntawm cov neeg ua hauj lwm ua ke.

1-800-321-OSHA (6742)

TTY 1-877-889-5627

www.osha.gov

Kev Tswj Hwm Kev Nyab Xeeb 

Ntawm Kev Ua Hauj Lwm 

thiab Kev Noj Qab Haus Huv

Zam kev caij tsheb thauj mus thiab los 

ntawm hauj lwm, yog tias ua tau.

➒ Ua raws cov lus qhia txog kev noj qab 

haus huv rau pej xeem tam sim no. 

Yog xav paub ntau ntxiv, mus saib 

www.osha.gov/coronavirus los sis 

hu rau 1-800-321-OSHA (6742).
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**STATEMENTPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS REQUIRED BYSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of John Deere Capital Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending January 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned herebycertify that to the best of our knowledge:

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

2.                                     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| March 1, 2010 |   | */s/ S.  R. Allen* | * * | Chairman and Principal  Executive Officer              |
|--------------------|--------|--------------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|               |   | S. R. Allen        |     |                                                   |
|               |   |               |     |                                                   |
| March 1, 2010 |   | */s/ J.  M. Field* | * * | Senior Vice President  and Principal Financial Officer |
|               |   | J. M. Field        |     |                                                   |

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to John Deere CapitalCorporation and will be retained by John Deere Capital Corporation andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

29

----
#### § 56.14102 Brakes for rail equipment.

Braking systems on railroad cars and locomotives shall be maintained in functional condition.
#### Harold Schantz, Respondent, v. Roberta Schantz, Appellant.

Motion for reargument or for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals referred to the court that rendered the decision. Beldoek, Acting P. J., Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur. Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of Double Eagle PetroleumCo. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, each of Stephen H. Hollis, the ChiefExecutive Officer, and David C. Milholm, the Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, herebycertifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief: (1) theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: May 10, 2006                                                        /s/ Stephen H. Hollis   Stephen H. Hollis   Chief Executive Officer                                                      /s/ David C. Milholm   David C. Milholm   Chief Financial Officer
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9775 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

119 North Anderson Street in Elwood, Indiana, as the ‘‘Officer Noah 

Jacob Shahnavaz Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2024 

Mrs. SPARTZ (for herself, Mr. MRVAN, Mr. YAKYM, Mr. BANKS, Mr. BAIRD, 

Mr. PENCE, Mr. CARSON, Mr. BUCSHON, and Mrs. HOUCHIN) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Accountability 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 119 North Anderson Street in Elwood, Indiana, as the ‘‘Officer Noah Jacob Shahnavaz Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OFFICER NOAH JACOB SHAHNAVAZ POST OF4 FICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 119 North Anderson Street in 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9775 IH

1 Elwood, Indiana, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘Officer Noah Jacob Shahnavaz Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Officer Noah Jacob 

7 Shahnavaz Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB