alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(39 Misc. Rep. 483.)

#### In re GUTTROFF’S ESTATE.

(Surrogate’s Court, New York County.

December, 1902.)

1. Judgment — Lien—Limitations—Amendment.

Under the laws existing in 1884 the statute o£ limitation was a bar to a judgment in six years after it was rendered. By Laws 1894, c. 307, Code Civ. Proc. §§’ 376, 382, 3017, were amended so as to make the 20-years limitation apply to all judgments thereafter docketed. *Held*that, a judgment docketed in 1884 being barred before Laws 1894, c. 307, took effect, such statute did not give such judgment any validity.

In the -matter of the estate of George Guttroff. Application for an order requiring administratrix to pay judgment recovered against decedent. Denied.

Charles Thaddeus Terry, for petitioner.

Max Steinert, for administratrix.

THOMAS, S.

The application is for an order requiring the administratrix to pay a judgment recovered against the decedent on May 3, 1884, in the Seventh judicial district court of the city of New York. A transcript of said judgment was filed and docketed in the office of the county clerk on May 7, 1884. The decedent died on June *22,*1899. The administratrix appears, and orally admits the possession of sufficient assets, but urges that under the six-years statute of limitation the claim is barred. In Dieffenbach v. Roch, 112 N. Y. 621, 20 N. E. 560, 2 L. R. A. 829, decided in 1889, it was determined that under the law as it then stood the statute of limitations became a bar against such a judgment in six years after it was rendered. By chapter 307 of the laws of 1894, sections 376, 382, and 3017 of the Code of Civil Procedure were amended so as to make the 20-years’ limitation apply to all judgments “hereafter [to wit, thereafter] docketed pursuant to the provisions of section 3017.” Section 376. At this time the six-years statute had run against the judgment now being considered, and section 3017 forbade the new docketing of a judgment of a court of record after the expiration of six years from its rendition. Tt is quite true, as contended by counsel for the creditors, that the legislature might constitutionally have enacted a retroactive statute of limitation. Hulbert v. Clark, 128 N. Y. 295, 28 N. E. 638, 14 L. R. A. 59; Campbell v. Holt, 115 U. S. 620, 6 Sup. Ct. 209, 29 E. Ed. 483. The difficulty is that they carefully guarded against doing anything of the kind by limiting the force of the amendment to judgments which might be docketed “hereafter,” to wit, after the amendment became a law. The judgment was barred before the amendment, and the amendment did not give it any force or vitality. In re Warner, 39 App. Div. 91, 56 N. Y. Supp. 585. The application is denied.

Application denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

JOSEPH A. PIHS, JR., §

§ No. 1 8 9 , 201 4

Plaintiff Below, §

Appellant, § Court Below:

§

v. § Superior Court of the

§ State of Delaware , in and for

GIOVANNI PITTARI

, § Kent County

§

Defendant Below, § C. A. No. K12C

- 03

- 027

Appellee. §

Submitted: October 15 , 2014

Decided: October 23 , 2014

Before STRINE

, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and VALIHURA

, Justices.

O R D E R

This 23 rd day of October 2014, upon consideration o f the parties’ brief s a nd

the record below

, it appears to the Court that Appellant Joseph Pihs, Jr. (“Pihs”)

raises two issues on appeal. First, he argues that the Superior Court erred in denying

his motion for judgment as a matter of law on the issue of Appellee Giovanni Pittari’s

(“Pittari”) negligence. Second, he argues that the Superior Court erred in denying his

request for a jury instruction concerning a claim under 21 Del. C. § 4168(a). We find

Superior Court’s decision s to deny the motion for jud gment as a matter of law and to

deny the request to give the jury instruction should be affirmed on the basis of and for

the reasons assigned by th e Superior Court in its ruling s o n March 25, 201 4.2 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the

Superior Court be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihur a

Justice
#### Savino Ferrara, Respondent, v. Germana Cennamo, Appellant.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 9,1962, which granted plaintiff’s motion, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for summary judgment, and directed an assessment of damages. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion for summary judgment denied. The plaintiff was a passenger in defendant’s automobile, driven by defendant’s son, who was killed when the automobile crashed into a parked vehicle. There were no other passengers in the ear. It would appear that plaintiff is the only person who has knowledge as to the manner in which the accident occurred. Summary judgment should not be granted if the facts are exclusively within the knowledge of the moving party (De *France*v. *Oestrike,*8 A D 2d 735). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.
§ 92.616 Program administration. The following program administration requirements contained in subpart K of this part apply to the ADDI: ( a ) *HOME Investment Trust Fund.* The requirements regarding the HOME Investment Trust Fund contained in § 92.500 apply to the ADDI, with the exception of paragraphs (c)(2) and (d)(1)(A).
( b ) *HOME Investment Partnership Agreement.* The requirements regarding HOME Investment Partnership Agreements contained in § 92.501 apply to the ADDI.
( c ) *Program disbursement and information system.* The requirements regarding program disbursement and information systems contained in § 92.502 apply to the ADDI.
( d ) *Program income, repayments and recaptured funds.* The requirements regarding program income, repayments, and recaptured funds contained in § 92.503 apply to the ADDI, except the program income and recaptured funds must be deposited in the participating jurisdiction's HOME investments trust fund local account and used in accordance with the HOME program requirements.
( e ) *Participating jurisdiction responsibilities and written agreements.* The requirements regarding participating jurisdiction responsibilities and written agreements contained in § 92.504 apply to the ADDI, with the modification that the written agreement is not required to cover any HOME requirement that is not applicable to the ADDI.
( f ) *Applicability of uniform administrative requirements.* The uniform administrative requirements contained in § 982.505 apply to the ADDI.
( g ) *Audit.* The audit requirements contained in § 92.506 apply to the ADDI.
( h ) *Closeout.* The closeout requirements contained in § 92.507 apply to the ADDI.
( i ) *Recordkeeping.* The project records must include records demonstrating that the family qualifies as a first-time homebuyer. The recordkeeping requirements contained in § 92.508 apply to the ADDI, with the exception of the following paragraphs: ( 1 ) Paragraph (a)(1);
( 2 ) Paragraphs (a)(2)(iv), (a)(2)(v), (a)(2)(vi), (a)(2)(xi), and (a)(2)(xii);
( 3 ) Paragraphs (a)(3)(vi), (a)(3)(vii), (a)(3)(viii), (a)(3)(ix), and (a)(3)(xiii);
( 4 ) Paragraph (a)(4);
( 5 ) Paragraphs (a)(7)(i)(B), (a)(7)(i)(C), (a)(7)(ii)(A), and (a)(7)(ix) (in addition, the requirements of paragraph (a)(7)(iv) apply to FY2003 ADDI funds only); and
( 6 ) Paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(3) (in addition, the requirements of paragraph (c)(5) apply to FY2003 ADDI funds only).
( j ) *Performance reports.* The requirements regarding performance reports contained in § 92.509 apply to the ADDI.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 025 6 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. INESSA VICTORIA HALL, aka INNA VIKTOROVNA POSTOLNIKOVA, aka NESSA CHRISMAN ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT** Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until August 28 , 2020 to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court July 29 2020

07/29/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0256
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.1107-2 Approved fire-resistant hydraulic fluids; minimum requirements.

Fire-resistant hydraulic fluids and concentrates required to be employed in the hydraulic system of underground equipment in accordance with the provisions of § 75.1107-1 shall be considered suitable only if they have been produced under an approval, or any modification thereof, issued pursuant to Part 35 Subchapter I of this chapter (Bureau of Mines Schedule 30), or any revision thereof.

[37 FR 15301, July 29, 1972]
#### § 57.22238 Actions at 2.0 percent methane (I-B, II-B, V-B, and VI mines).

If methane reaches 2.0 percent in the mine atmosphere, all persons other than competent persons necessary to make ventilation changes shall be withdrawn from the mine until methane is reduced to less than 0.5 percent.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Dolores Goodwin, Appellant.

Motion granted, order dismissing appeal vacated, and case added to calendar of November 1960 Term; respondent directed to file brief on or before November 17, 1960.
Exhibit 32 (b)



Citizens Financial Corp.



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



I,
Thomas K. Derbyshire, Vice President, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of Citizens Financial Corp. (the company) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



|1. | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the company for the annual period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |                            
|------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date: 5/24/05 |  | /s/ Thomas K. Derbyshire   
|              |  | Vice President, Treasurer  
|              |  | Principal Financial Officer



8
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9382 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9382

 To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to add alpha-gal to 
               the definition of ``major food allergen''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 16, 2024

 Mr. Van Drew introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to add alpha-gal to 
               the definition of ``major food allergen''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Alpha-gal Allergen Inclusion Act''.

SEC. 2. ADDING ALPHA-GAL TO DEFINITION OF ``MAJOR FOOD ALLERGEN''.

    (a) In General.--Section 201(qq) of the Federal Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321(qq)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
                    ``(3)(i) Galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose (commonly 
                known as `alpha-gal').
                    ``(ii) For purposes of this subparagraph, the term 
                `galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose' includes--
                            ``(I) ingredients derived from non-
                        catarrhine primate mammals; and
                            ``(II) red algae in the order Gigartinales.
                    ``(iii) For purposes of this subparagraph, the term 
                `galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose' does not include 
                mammal-derived ingredients for which the Secretary 
                determines there is no galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose 
                above an established, detectable limit (such as 
                ingredients made from alpha-gal-knockout mammals).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply beginning on January 1, 2026.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 56.6903 Burning explosive material.

If explosive material is suspected of burning at the blast site, persons shall be evacuated from the endangered area and shall not return for at least one hour after the burning or suspected burning has stopped.
EXHIBIT 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Cogo Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Jeffrey Kang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 9, 2009 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Jeffrey Kang       
|                        |  | Name:  |  | Jeffrey Kang           
|                        |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
§ 285.831 What incidents must I report, and when must I report them? ( a ) You must report the following incidents to us immediately via oral communication, and provide a written follow-up report (paper copy or electronically transmitted) within 15-business days after the incident: ( 1 ) Fatalities;
( 2 ) Incidents that require the evacuation of person(s) from the facility to shore or to another offshore facility;
( 3 ) Fires and explosions;
( 4 ) Collisions that result in property or equipment damage greater than $25,000. (Collision means the act of a moving vessel (including an aircraft) striking another vessel, or striking a stationary vessel or object. Property or equipment damage means the cost of labor and material to restore all affected items to their condition before the damage, including, but not limited to, the OCS facility, a vessel, a helicopter, or the equipment. It does not include the cost of salvage, cleaning, dry docking, or demurrage);
( 5 ) Incidents involving structural damage to an OCS facility that is severe enough so that activities on the facility cannot continue until repairs are made;
( 6 ) Incidents involving crane or personnel/material handling activities, if they result in a fatality, injury, structural damage, or significant environmental damage;
( 7 ) Incidents that damage or disable safety systems or equipment (including firefighting systems);
( 8 ) Other incidents resulting in property or equipment damage greater than $25,000; and
( 9 ) Any other incidents involving significant environmental damage, or harm.
( b ) You must provide a written report of the following incidents to us within 15 days after the incident: ( 1 ) Any injuries that result in the injured person not being able to return to work or to all of their normal duties the day after the injury occurred; and
( 2 ) All incidents that require personnel on the facility to muster for evacuation for reasons not related to weather or drills.
#### § 56.11017 Inclined fixed ladders.

Fixed ladders shall not incline backwards.
§ 556.309 Does BOEM offer blocks in a sale that is not on the Five Year program schedule (called a Supplemental Sale)? ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, BOEM may offer a block within a planning area included in the Five Year program in an otherwise unscheduled sale, if the block: ( 1 ) Received a bid that was rejected in an earlier sale;
( 2 ) Had a high bid that was forfeited in a scheduled sale; or
( 3 ) Is a development block subject to drainage.
( b ) For an unscheduled sale, BOEM may disclose the classification of the block as a development block.
( c ) Blocks in the Central or Western Gulf of Mexico Planning Areas cannot be offered in a sale that is not on the schedule.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF 18 U.S.C.

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cardima, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Barry D. Michaels, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to § 1350 of Chapter 63 of 18 U.S.C., as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/    BARRY D. MICHAELS                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                           
|Barry D. Michaels Chief Financial
Officer November 14, 2003



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cardima, Inc. and will be retained by Cardima, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon request.



This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
### §176. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Mar. 28, 1918, ch. 28, §1, 40 Stat. 460, authorized acquisition of property on Hudson River owned by North German Lloyd Dock Company and Hamburg-American Line Terminal & Navigation Company and provided that section 175 of this title did not apply to expenditures authorized in connection with such property. The President, by proclamation dated June 28, 1918, took possession of such property.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(h)

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                INTEGRA BANK CORPORATION EMPLOYEES' 401(k) PLAN

            This First Amendment to Integra Bank Corporation Employees' 40 1(k)
Plan is adopted by Integra Bank Corporation.

                                   BACKGROUND

            1. Effective January 1, 2003, Integra Bank Corporation ("Employer")
amended and completely restated the Integra Bank Corporation Employees' 40 1(k)
Plan ("Plan").

            2. The Employer wishes to amend the Plan further.

                                   AMENDMENT

            THEREFORE, effective January 1, 2003, the Plan is amended as
follows:

            1. The definition of "Compensation" set forth in Section 2.01 of the
Plan is amended to read as follows:

            "Compensation" means, with respect to an Employee for a Plan Year,
      the Employee's wages, as defined in Code subsection 3401(a), and all other
      payments of compensation by the Employer in the course of the Employer's
      trade or business for a Plan Year for which the Employer is required to
      furnish the Employee a written statement under Code sections 6041(d), 605
      1(a)(3) and 6052. "Compensation" is determined without regard to any rules
      under Code subsection 3401(a) that limit the remuneration included in
      wages based on the nature or location of the employment or the services
      performed, such as the exception for agricultural labor in Code paragraph

<PAGE>

      340 1(a)(2).. "Compensation" also includes Elective Employer Contributions
      for the Plan Year, amounts contributed or deferred by the Employer for the
      Plan Year at the election of the Employee that are excluded from the
      Employee's gross income under Code section 125 or 457, and qualified
      transportation fringe benefits described in Code subsection 132(0(4).
      Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this paragraph, "Compensation"
      does not include, whether or not includable in the Employee's gross
      income, reimbursements or expense allowances, fringe benefits (cash or
      noncash), moving expenses, deferred compensation or welfare benefits.
      Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this paragraph, compensation
      received by an Employee before he becomes a Participant will not be
      considered "Compensation."

            2. The definition of "Highly Compensated Participant" set forth in
Section

2.01 of the Plan is amended by adding the following:

      (3) The determination of who is a Highly Compensated Participant and the
compensation that is considered will be made in accordance with Code section
414(q)(7).
§ 556.520 What happens if I am the successful high bidder and BOEM accepts my bid? ( a ) If BOEM accepts your bid, BOEM will provide you with the appropriate number of copies of the lease for you to execute and return to BOEM. Within 11 business days after you receive the lease copies, you must: ( 1 ) Execute all copies of the lease;
( 2 ) Pay the first year's rental;
( 3 ) Pay the balance of the bonus bid, unless deferred under paragraph (b) below;
( 4 ) Comply with subpart I of this part; and,
( 5 ) Return all copies of the executed lease, including any required bond or other form of security approved by the Regional Director, to BOEM.
( b ) If provided for in the final notice of sale, BOEM may defer any part of the bonus and bid payment for up to five years after the sale according to a schedule included in the final notice of sale. You must provide a bond acceptable to BOEM to guarantee payment of a deferred bonus bid.
( c ) If you do not make the required payments and execute and return all copies of the lease and any required bond within 11 business days after receipt, or if you otherwise fail to comply with applicable regulations, your deposit will be forfeited. However, BOEM will return any deposit with interest if the tract is withdrawn from leasing before you execute the lease.
( d ) If you use an agent to execute the lease, you must include evidence with the executed copies of the lease that a person who is on the list of persons referenced in § 556.402(c)(3) authorized the agent to act for you.
( e ) After you comply with all requirements in this section, and after BOEM has executed the lease, BOEM will send you a fully executed lease.
#### In re ROTHSCHILD.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 24, 1905.)

In the matter of Regina Rothschild. No opinion. Motion granted, so far as to dismiss appeal, with $10 costs.