alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §31143. Investigating complaints and protecting complainants

(a) Investigating Complaints.—The Secretary of Transportation shall conduct a timely investigation of a nonfrivolous written complaint alleging that a substantial violation of a regulation prescribed under this subchapter is occurring or has occurred within the prior 60 days. The Secretary shall give the complainant timely notice of the findings of the investigation. The Secretary is not required to conduct separate investigations of duplicative complaints.

(b) Protecting Complainants.—Notwithstanding section 552 of title 5, the Secretary may disclose the identity of a complainant only if disclosure is necessary to prosecute a violation. If disclosure becomes necessary, the Secretary shall take every practical means within the Secretary's authority to ensure that the complainant is not subject to harassment, intimidation, disciplinary action, discrimination, or financial loss because of the disclosure.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1012.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 31143(a) | 49 App.:2511(a). | Oct. 30, 1984, Pub. L. 98–554, §212, 98 Stat. 2841. |
| 31143(b) | 49 App.:2511(b). | |

Section

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Telephone Hotline for Reporting Safety Violations

Pub. L. 105–178, title IV, §4017, June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 413, as amended by Pub. L. 106–159, title II, §213, Dec. 9, 1999, 113 Stat. 1766, provided that:

"(a) In General.—For a period of not less than 2 years beginning on or before the 90th day following the date of enactment of this Act [June 9, 1998], the Secretary [of Transportation] shall establish, maintain, and promote the use of a nationwide toll-free telephone system to be used by drivers of commercial motor vehicles and others to report potential violations of Federal motor carrier safety regulations.

"(b) Monitoring.—The Secretary shall monitor reports received by the telephone system and may consider nonfrivolous information provided by such reports in setting priorities for motor carrier safety audits and other enforcement activities.

"(c) Staffing.—The toll-free telephone system shall be staffed 24 hours a day 7 days a week by individuals knowledgeable about Federal motor carrier safety regulations and procedures.

"(d) Protection of Persons Reporting Violations.—

"(1) Prohibition.—A person reporting a potential violation to the telephone system while acting in good faith may not be discharged, disciplined, or discriminated against regarding pay, terms, or privileges of employment because of the reporting of such violation.

"(2) Applicability of section 31105 of title 49.—For purposes of section 31105 of title 49, United States Code, a violation or alleged violation of paragraph (1) shall be treated as a violation of section 31105(a) of such title.

"(e) Funding.—From amounts set aside under [former] section 104(a)(1)(B) of title 23, United States Code, the Secretary may use not more than $250,000 for fiscal year 1999 and $375,000 for each of fiscal years 2000 through 2003 to carry out this section."
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Percy Green, Appellant.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9749 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to abolish the reorganization 

authority of the Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 

Mr. BISHOP of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to abolish 

the reorganization authority of the Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ABOLITION OF REORGANIZATION AUTHORITY 

4 OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECU5 RITY. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title VIII of the Homeland Secu7 rity Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 361 et seq.) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking section 857 (6 U.S.C. 427); 

9 (2) by redesignating section 858 (6 U.S.C. 428) 

10 as section 857; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9749 IH

1 (3) by striking section 872 (6 U.S.C. 452); and 

2 (4) by striking section 881 (6 U.S.C. 461). 

3 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—The Homeland 

4 Security Act of 2002 is amended— 

5 (1) in section 506 (6 U.S.C. 316)— 

6 (A) by striking subsection (b); and 

7 (B) by redesignating subsections (c) and 

8 (d) as subsections (b) and (c), respectively; and 

9 (2) in section 702(b) (6 U.S.C. 342(b)), by 

10 striking paragraph (4). 

11 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—The table of contents 

12 in section 1(b) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 is 

13 amended— 

14 (1) by striking the items relating to sections 

15 857 and 858 and inserting the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 857. Identification of new entrants into the Federal marketplace.’’; and 

16 (2) by striking the items relating to sections 

17 872 and 881. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
C.J. 

Appellant appeared to claim that he had good cause due to 

ineffective assistance of post-conviction counsel during the litigation of his 

first petition. Appellant's claim lacked merit as appellant had no 

statutory right to post-conviction counsel, and thus the ineffective 

assistance of post-conviction counsel did not provide good cause for a 

successive and untimely petition. See Crump v. Warden, 113 Nev. 293, 

303 & n.5, 934 P.2d 247, 253 & n.5 (1997); McKague v. Warden, 112 Nev. 

159, 164-65 & n.5, 912 P.2d 255, 258 & n.5 (1996); see also Brown v. 

McDaniel, 130 Nev. , 331 P.3d 867, 870 (2014) (explaining that 

post-conviction counsel's performance does not constitute good cause to 

excuse the procedural bars unless the appointment of post-conviction 

counsel was mandated by statute). Therefore, the district court did not err 

in denying the petition as procedurally barred. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 3 

3We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in 

proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude 

that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent 

that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those 

submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings 

below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A (en 
SAITTA, J., dissenting: 

I would extend the equitable rule recognized in Martinez v. 

Ryan, 566 U.S. , 132 S. Ct. 1309 (2012) to this case because appellant 

was convicted of murder and is facing a severe sentence. See Brown, 130 

Nev. at P.3d at 875 (Cherry, J., dissenting). Accordingly, I would 

reverse and remand for the district court to determine whether appellant 

can demonstrate a substantial underlying ineffective-assistance-of-trialcounsel claim that was omitted due to the ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel. I therefore dissent. 

Saitta 

cc: Hon. Stefany Miley, District Judge 

Raymond A. Garrett 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 3 

(01 1947A em
### §40909. Compliance with title IX of Education Amendments of 1972

To comply with title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.), the Administrator shall conduct compliance reviews of at least 2 grantees annually.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3394.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 40909 | 42 U.S.C. 16798(b). | Pub. L. 109–155, title VI, §619(b), Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2935. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Education Amendments of 1972, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 92–318, June 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 235. Title IX of the Act, known as the Patsy Takemoto Mink Equal Opportunity in Education Act, is classified principally to chapter 38 (§1681 et seq.) of Title 20, Education. For complete classification of title IX to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1681 of Title 20 and Tables.
### §432d. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 432d, comprising section 706 of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as section 3146 of this title.
#### § 746.10 Information collection.

The information collection requirements contained in this section have been approved by OSM of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3507 and assigned clearance number 1029-0026. The information is being collected to determine compliance with section 523 of the Act (30 U.S.C. 1273) and this part. The obligation to respond to the information collection requirements of this part is mandatory.
### Hydrologic processes and radionuclide distribution in a cavity and chimney produced by the Cannikin nuclear explosion, Amchitka Island, Alaska

By: H. C. Claassen

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp712D

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
# C_2023237EN.01000301.xml

| 5.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11113 – SADCO / DPDHL / JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 237/03)

On 28 June 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11113. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11113. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
## الصفحة الرئيسية                   من نحن                    التقديم للنشر                    الاشتراك     			   الأعداد السابقة

## **الارتباط بالمواقع الأخرى**                                          فرنسي                    صيني                    إنجليزي                    برتغالي                    إسباني

# **الاعداد السابقة**

          - 2010s              - 2010                - الاول  الثانيالثالث
- الرابع   2011- الاول  الثانيالثالث
- الرابع   2012- الاول  الثانيالثالث
- الرابع   2013- الاول  الثانيالثالث
- 2000s    - 2005      - الاول  الثانيالثالث
- الرابع   2006- الاول  الثانيالثالث
- الرابع   2007- الاول  الثانيالثالث
- الرابع   2008- الاول  الثانيالثالث
- الرابع   2009- الاول  الثانيالثالث
- الرابع                           Air Force Research Institute (AFRI) 2009-2018      Maxwell AFB, Alabama 36112 Updated/Reviewed 1-7-2014
 Phone: 334 953-6382 | Fax: 334 953-1626 Privacy and Security Notice | Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Program  | Accessibility/Section 508 US Air Force  
Air University  
AFRI
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

The Boeing Company ) ASBCA No. 62849

)

Under Contract No. N68335

- 10

- G

- 0012 et al

. )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT : Seth H. Locke, Esq.

Brenna D. Duncan, Esq.

Julia M. Fox, Esq.

Perkins Coie LLP

Washington, DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Arthur M. Taylor , Esq.

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney

Kara M. Klaas, Esq.

Trial Attorney

Defense Contract Management Agency

Chantilly, VA

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: December 1, 2021

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62849

, Appeal of The Boeing

Company , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: December 1, 2021 JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Gilbert M. Hairston, Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed and proceeding remitted to the Brie County Court for a hearing in accordance with the memorandum. Memorandum: The defendant maintains that he was prevented from mailing a notice of appeal within the 30-day period from the date of his sentence because the authorities in the State prison refused to provide postage or to allow him to borrow against future credit a sum sufficient to pay for the postage for the mailing of the notice of appeal. In support of his contention, the defendant submitted upon this appeal, with the consent of the District Attorney, a photostatic copy of a notice of appeal prepared in time and authenticated by a notary public at the State prison. Under the circumstances, a hearing should be held by the County Court to develop the facts. We do not undertake to determine at this time whether *coram nobis*or habeas corpus or an original motion in this court is the proper remedy, if it should be found that the defendant was wrongfully prevented from serving a notice of appeal (cf. *People*v. *Guhr,*5 A D 2d 688; *People*v. *Hill,*9 A D 2d 451). (Appeal from order of Erie County Court denying defendant’s application for writ of error *coram nobis.)*Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and Henry, JJ.
METAL / NONMETAL

Serious Accident

Surface Dredge - A miner was preparing to move the

floatation platform. While standing on the platform and

adjusting the lift chains, the miner stepped back into the 

uncovered 3’ X 3’ opening for the turbine water pump falling 

against the side breaking his ribs and puncturing a lung. 

BEST PRACTICES

 Establish and discuss safe work procedures. Identify and 

control all hazards. Train all persons to recognize and 

understand safe job procedures before beginning work.

 Protect openings near travelways through which persons may 

fall by installing railings, barriers, or covers. 

 Keep temporary access opening covers secured in place at all 

times when the opening is not being used. 

 Train all persons to recognize and understand safe job 

procedures before beginning work.

 Wear fall protection where there is a danger of falling.

.
### §411. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 411, comprising section 307 of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as section 3074 of this title.
(January 18, 1961)

#### Joseph U. Fiore, Appellant, v. Pasquale Amoruso et al., Respondents, and Frank Ferrino et al., Intervenors-Respondents.

Oral motion by appellant to extend time to perfect appeal, granted; time extended to the February Term, beginning January 30, 1961; appeal ordered on the calendar for said term. Oral cross motion by respondent to dismiss appeal, denied. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before January 26, 1961. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
### §3350. Maximum amount charged for declassification reviews

In reviewing and processing a request by a person for the mandatory declassification of information pursuant to Executive Order No. 13526, a successor executive order, or any provision of law, the head of an element of the intelligence community—

(1) may not charge the person reproduction fees in excess of the amount of fees that the head would charge the person for reproduction required in the course of processing a request for information under section 552 of title 5 (commonly referred to as the "Freedom of Information Act"); and

(2) may waive or reduce any processing fees in the same manner as the head waives or reduces fees under such section 552.

(Pub. L. 115–31, div. N, title III, §313, May 5, 2017, 131 Stat. 816.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Executive Order No. 13526, referred to in text, is Ex. Ord. No. 13526, Dec. 29, 2009, 75 F.R. 707, 1013, which is set out as a note under section 3161 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

For definition of "intelligence community", referred to in text, see section 2 of div. N of Pub. L. 115–31, set out as a note under section 3003 of this title.
- USGS Home
- Contact USGS
- Search USGS
-     - USGS Publications Warehouse
  - Contact
  - Explore recent publications     by USGS Authors
  - Browse all of Pubs Warehouse     by Publication type and year
  - FAQS
  - Web     Service Documentation
  - Other     Resources
  - Descriptions of US     Geological Survey Report Series 
- USGS Publications   Warehouse
- Explore    - Explore recent publications     by USGS Authors
  - Browse all of Pubs Warehouse     by Publication type and year 
- Documentation    - FAQS
  - Web     Service Documentation
  - Other     Resources
  - Descriptions of US     Geological Survey Report Series 
- Contact
Search:                                                                                            The Tertiary gravels of the Sierra Nevada of CaliforniaProfessional Paper 73- By:
- Waldemar   Lindgren                         
TweetLinks- Document:  Document
- Plates:
Plate 1                                    (pdf)
Plate 9                                    (pdf)

- Download citation as:   RIS
AbstractStudy AreaAdditional publication details- Publication type:
- Report
- Publication Subtype:
- USGS Numbered Series
- Title:
- The Tertiary gravels of the Sierra Nevada of California
- Series title:
- Professional Paper
- Series number:
- 73
- Year Published:
- 1911
- Language:
- English
- Publisher:
- United States Government Printing Office
- Publisher location:
- Washington, D.C.
- Description:
- 226 p.; 2 Plates
- Country:
- United States
- State:
- California
- Other Geospatial:
- Sierra Nevada
- Online Only (Y/N):
- N
- Additional Online Files (Y/N):
- N

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found here.

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |                 U.S. Geological Survey                URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp73                                     Page Contact Information: Pubs Warehouse Contact Page                    Page Last Modified: October 06, 2015 14:03:23
(April 26, 1962)

#### Ethel Waugh, Respondent-Appellant, v. Sicilian Asphalt Paving Company, Appellant, and Consolidated Edison Company of New York et al., Respondents.

Order, entered on June 21, 1961, setting aside verdict and granting new trial unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, the verdict is reinstated, and (1) judgment directed in favor of plaintiff against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York (Edison) and defendant City of New York and in favor of defendant Sicilian Asphalt Paving Company (Sicilian) against plaintiff, upon the verdict as reinstated, and (2) judgment directed in favor of Sicilian upon the cross complaints of Edison and the city against Sicilian, and in favor of the city upon its cross complaint against Edison, with $20 costs and disbursements on appeal to plaintiff and Sicilian against Edison and the city. Pursuant to a permit issued by the city, Edison excavated a portion of a street in order to repair a steam leak. After completion of the repairs, Sicilian was engaged by Edison to repave the area and did so. Some months later, while plaintiff was crossing the street on a hot August afternoon, her foot caught in a layer of soft or sticky paving material which had accumulated over a manhole cover maintained by Edison in the repaved area. For the *645injuries sustained from her ensuing fall, the jury awarded damages against Edison and the city but exonerated Sicilian. The court set aside the verdict for inconsistency and ordered a new trial, on the theory that if Sicilian had performed its work properly, as the jury in effect found, then no dangerous condition existed for which its codefendants could be held responsible. There would be no inconsistency if, subsequent to Sicilian’s due performance of its task and without its fault, the paving material encroached upon the manhole cover and created a dangerous condition which the other defendants were under a duty to prevent or remove. Our review of the entire record persuades us that the jury could permissibly so find. Accordingly the verdict is not inconsistent and must be reinstated. Sicilian being blameless, it can have no liability to its codefendants. As between the city and Edison, the latter was the active and responsible tort-feasor on the evidence and must indemnify the former, as indeed the terms of the permit contemplate. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, McNally and Eager, JJ.
#### § 57.20011 Barricades and warning signs.

Areas where health or safety hazards exist that are not immediately obvious to employees shall be barricaded, or warning signs shall be posted at all approaches. Warning signs shall be readily visible, legible, and display the nature of the hazard and any protective action required.