alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                              CERTIFICATION OF THE
                        JOINT CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trident Rowan Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark S.
Hauser, Joint Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                          /s/ Mark S. Hauser
                                          -----------------------------
                                          Mark S. Hauser
                                          Joint Chief Executive Officer
                                          May 25, 2004
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document



	

 	 	 




 
 

Exhibit  4.8

 



	 	 	KPMG LLP

Chartered Accountants	 	 
	 	 	1200 205 - 5th Avenue SW

Calgary AB    T2P 4B9	 	Telephone (403) 691-8000

Telefax (403) 691-8008

www.kpmg.ca





Alberta Securities Commission 


November 20,
2002 


Dear
Sirs/Mesdames 


 TransCanada PipeLines Limited (the "Company")  


We
refer to the short form prospectus of the above Company dated November 20, 2002 relating to the sale and issue of US $1,000,000,000 Common Shares, Preferred Shares or Debt Securities of
the Company. 


We
consent to the use, through incorporation by reference in the short form prospectus, of our report dated February 25, 2002 to the shareholders of the Company on the following financial
statements: 



	•
	Consolidated
balance sheets as at December 31, 2001 and 2002;



	•
	Consolidated
statements of earnings, retained earnings and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2001. 




We
report that we have read the short form prospectus and all information specifically incorporated by reference therein and have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the
information contained therein that are derived from the consolidated financial statements upon which we have reported or that are within our knowledge as a result of our audit of such consolidated
financial statements. 


This
letter is provided solely for the purpose of assisting the securities regulatory authority to which it is addressed in discharging its responsibilities and should not be used for any other
purpose. Any use that a third party makes of this letter, or any reliance or decisions based on it, are the responsibility of such third parties. We accept no responsibility for loss or damages, if
any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this letter. 


Yours
very truly 


/s/
KPMG LLP


Chartered
Accountants 


Calgary,
Canada

November 20, 2002 




  









QuickLinks


Exhibit 4.8
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-17642, Form S-8 No. 33-45131, Form S-8 No. 33-45132, Form S-8
No. 33-62863, Form S-8 No. 33-64860, Form S-8 No. 33-72494, Form S-8 No.
33-77586, Form S-8 No. 33-77590, Form S-8 No. 333-74873, Form S-8 No. 333-68103,
Form S-3 No. 33-85898, and Form S-8 333-89127) of InterVoice-Brite, Inc. and
subsidiaries of our report dated April 17, 2002, except for Notes H and Q, as to
which the date is May 29, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of InterVoice-Brite, Inc. and subsidiaries included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended February 28, 2002.

                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Dallas, Texas
May 29, 2002
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-10565

Summary Calendar

I S NDATAH, Plaintiff-Appellant

versus

J ACK COX, SR; TENNELL ATKINS; RODNEY DEBAUN; GARY WITHERSPOON ; CATHERINE WITHERSPOON; GEORGE DAY; JESSE E THOMPSON; WINSTON SCOTT MCINTOSH; ROBERT GILGORE; CHRIS KNABEL; ASIF BUTT; COLIN DEVALLY; RODERICK BEMMINGS; GLENN FENECH; JERRY COLLIVER; MOHAMMED EL HUJJ ABRAHAM; H C PASRAM; FILDMENO CARDOSO; DJONDO MESSAN KOFFL; BOBBIE COON; CHERYL PHILLIPS; SHARON DUNCAN also known as Lee Lewalling; DANA ALHAWAJ, also known as Dana Jones; BROADMOOR APARTMENTS; OAKPARK APARTMENTS; AIRCRAFT INSURANCE; DALLAS JET CENTER INC; ARLINGTON JET CENTER INC Defendants-Appellees

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:98-CV-309-X

June 9, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Ndatah appeals the district court 's dismissal of his civil

rights and RICO claims. The district court dismissed Ndatah's RICO

and constitutional claims as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. §2

1915(e)(2)(B)(i). We review a dismissal under that provision for

abuse of discretion. S ee Siglar v. Hightowe r , 112 F.3d 191, 193

(5th Cir. 1997). After a careful review of the record, we are

persuaded that the district court did not abuse its discretion in

dismissing Ndatah's civil rights and RICO claims.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 10u


                           WINNEBAGO INDUSTRIES, INC.

                      OFFICERS INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
                               GROUP A - OFFICERS
                             FISCAL PERIOD 2001-2002

                                 PLAN AMENDMENT


On October 9, 2002, the Board of Directors of Winnebago Industries, Inc. adopted
a Resolution amending the Officers Incentive Compensation Plan for the Fiscal
Period 2001-2002 in accordance with a recommendation made by the Human Resources
Committee. Such amendment restated Section 7 of the Plan which had provided for
an annual stock match equal to 50 percent of the total cash incentives earned
for the year to give the officer the option of taking such annual supplementary
Company match either in cash or in the form of restricted Company stock. The
text of the Resolution adopted by the Board is as follows:

         WHEREAS, the Board of Directors adopted the Winnebago Industries, Inc.
Officers Incentive Compensation Plan (Fiscal Period 2001-2002) at its meeting on
June 20, 2001 to be effective as of September 2, 2001;

         WHEREAS, the Human Resources Committee (the "Committee") has reserved
the right to amend any rule or regulation of the Plan under Section 2(b) thereof
and thus recommend to the Board of Directors the adoption of any such amendment;

         WHEREAS, the Committee deems it necessary and prudent to amend the Plan
in order to permit its participants to elect to receive payment of the annual
Company match specified in Paragraph 7 of such Plan, in the form of either cash
or restricted Company stock;

         NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors hereby
amends the Winnebago Industries, Inc. Officers Incentive Compensation Plan
(Fiscal Period 2001-2002) effective August 31, 2002 by deleting Paragraph 7
therefrom and substituting the following in lieu thereof:

         7.      Annual Supplementary Company Match. Fifty percent (50%) of a
                 participant's cash incentive compensation earned for the year,
                 pursuant to Paragraph 5 of this Plan will be matched annually
                 by the Company. The annual supplementary Company match shall be
                 paid as soon as practical after the final year-end incentive
                 compensation accounting and payment of any remaining incentive
                 compensation holdback for the year. Participants shall elect in
                 writing within 45 days following the end of the fiscal year
                 whether to receive the total of any such annual supplementary
                 Company match in the form of cash or in the form of restricted
                 Company stock.
### §3239. Requirement to buy certain satellite component from American sources

#### (a) Definitions

In this section:

#### (1) Covered element of the intelligence community

The term "covered element of the intelligence community" means an element of the intelligence community that is not an element of the Department of Defense.

#### (2) National security satellite

The term "national security satellite" means a satellite weighing over 400 pounds whose principle purpose is to support the national security or intelligence needs of the United States Government.

#### (3) United States

The term "United States" means the several States, the District of Columbia, and the territories and possessions of the United States.

#### (b) Requirement

Beginning January 1, 2021, except as provided in subsection (c), a covered element of the intelligence community may not award a contract for a national security satellite if the satellite uses a star tracker that is not produced in the United States, including with respect to both the software and the hardware of the star tracker.

#### (c) Exception

The head of a covered element of the intelligence community may waive the requirement under subsection (b) if, on a case-by-case basis, the head certifies in writing to the congressional intelligence committees that—

(1) there is no available star tracker produced in the United States that meets the mission and design requirements of the national security satellite for which the star tracker will be used;

(2) the cost of a star tracker produced in the United States is unreasonable, based on a market survey; or

(3) such waiver is necessary for the national security interests of the United States based on an urgent and compelling need.

(July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title XI, §1109, as added Pub. L. 116–260, div. W, title III, §308(a), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2368.)
#### § 556.706 What if I want to transfer record title interests in more than one lease at the same time, but to different parties?

You may not transfer interests in more than one lease to different parties using the same instrument. If you want to transfer the interest in more than one lease at the same time, you must submit duplicate, originally executed forms for each transfer. The forms used for each transfer must be accompanied by a cover letter executed by one of the parties to the transfer (or an authorized agent thereof) and evidence of payment via *pay.gov.*
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                       SECTION 906 OF THE
                   SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In  connection with the Quarterly Report of  Dionics,  Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
2004,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  (the
"Report"),  the  undersigned certifies,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley  Act  of 2002, to the best of the undersigned's  knowledge,
that:

      (1)   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements  of
Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of  1934;
and

       (2)   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the Company.


Dated: November 15, 2004          By: /s/ Bernard Kravitz
                                  Bernard Kravitz,
                                  President  and Chief Executive
                                  Officer (Principal Executive
                                  Officer)


Dated: November 15, 2004          By: /s/ Bernard Kravitz
                                  Bernard Kravitz,
                                  Principal Financial Officer
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 4, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

131021 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. JOHN J. FISCHER, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices

v SC: 131021 COA: 264959 Wayne CC: 04-406701-NO GKN SINTER METALS, INC.-ROMULUS, GKN SINTER METALS, INC., and JEFF LEE, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 16, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH and K ELLY , JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

t0927 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 4, 2006

Clerk
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except under the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 40458 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. JOSE H ER N AN D EZ- G O M EZ D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e S ou t h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 2: 07- C R - 661- 1 B e fo r e J O N E S , C h ie f J u d g e , a n d J O L L Ya n d E L R O D , C ir c u it J u d g e s . P E R C U R I A M: * T h e att orney app oi n t ed to repre se n t Jose H erna n dez-G om ez ha s m oved f o rl e av e t o w i t h draw a n d has f i l e d ab r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A nder s v. Ca lif o rn ia , 386 U .S . 738 ( 196 7) . H erna n dez-G om ez ha s not f i l ed a respon se. O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w o f t he r e c o r d a nd c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f di s c l ose s no n on frivo l ou s i s s u e f or a p p ea l . A ccord i n gly, cou n sel’ s m oti on f or leav e to w i t hdr aw i s G RA N TE D , c o uns e li s e xc us e d f r o m f ur t he rre s po ns ibi l i t i e s he r e i n, a n d th e A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D . S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D April 30, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
[PEMEX LOGO]                          SOCIAL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATE MANAGEMENT

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             BULLETIN NO. 298/2003
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                DATE: 11/17/2003

         An accumulated income of 13 thousand, 940 million dollars was obtained
by Petroleos Mexicanos, by exporting an average volume of one million, 860
thousand barrels of varying quality crude oil per day, from January to October,
2003.

         The currency captured during the months referred to, was a greater
amount by one thousand, 188 million dollars, compared with the income generated
by crude sales abroad in the first ten months of 2002. Likewise, the value of
exports from January to October of this year was greater by 831 million dollars
compared with the export value for the entire previous year.

         Based on the oil indicators corresponding to the month of October this
year, in the first ten months, the average weighted sales price of the Mexican
crude oils basket of exports was 24.65 dollars per barrel.

         During the period of reference, Petroleos Mexicanos, through the PMI
Comercio Internacional, sold an average of 17 thousand barrels per day of Istmo
type oil to the different customers of Mexico on the American Continent and in
Europe and the Far East, generating a currency income for Mexico of 144 million
dollars.

         With regards to the exports of Maya heavy oil, made during the January
to October period in 2003, Pemex captured a total of 11 thousand, 884 million
dollars, by selling an average volume of one million, 627 thousand barrels a day
in three geographical regions.

         Regarding the sales of the Olmeca extra-light crude oil, which, for its
quality and price, enjoys great popularity in the international market Pemex
exported an average daily volume of 216 thousand barrels from January to
October, 2003, with a value of one thousand, 912 million dollars.

         Last year, the American Continent acquired a volume of one million, 627
thousand barrels per day of the Mexican crude oil exports, followed by Europe,
with a daily average of 181 thousand barrels and, finally, the Far East, with 52
thousand barrels.

         The average price of Istmo crude oil in the months referred to was
27.36 dollars per barrel, the Maya crude oil was 24.04 dollars per barrel and
the Olmec crude oil closed at 29.11 dollars per barrel.

                                    *********
Editorial Note on Part 784
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54958, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 784 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93355, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 784.25 Return of coal processing waste to abandoned underground workings. ( a ) Each plan shall describe the design, operation and maintenance of any proposed coal processing waste disposal facility, including flow diagrams and any other necessary drawings and maps, for the approval of the regulatory authority and the Mine Safety and Health Administration under 30 CFR 817.81(f).
( b ) Each plan shall describe the source and quality of waste to be stowed, area to be backfilled, percent of the mine void to be filled, method of constructing underground retaining walls, influence of the backfilling operation on active underground mine operations, surface area to be supported by the backfill, and the anticipated occurrence of surface effects following backfilling.
( c ) The applicant shall describe the source of the hydraulic transport mediums, method of dewatering the placed backfill, retainment of water underground, treatment of water if released to surface streams, and the effect on the hydrologic regime.
( d ) The plan shall describe each permanent monitoring well to be located in the backfilled area, the stratum underlying the mined coal, and gradient from the backfilled area.
( e ) The requirements of paragraphs (a), (b), (c), and (d) of this section shall also apply to pneumatic backfilling operations, except where the operations are exempted by the regulatory authority from requirements specifying hydrologic monitoring.
[44 FR 15366, Mar. 13, 1979, as amended at 48 FR 44780, Sept. 30, 1983; 81 FR 93355, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54958, Nov. 17, 2017]
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the quarterly report of The Dewey Electronics
Corporation (the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John H. D. Dewey, Chief Executive
Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS 1350, as
adopted pursuant to SS 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Corporation.

/s/ John H.D. Dewey
John H. D. Dewey, Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 10, 2011

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to The Dewey Electronics Corporation and will be retained
by The Dewey Electronics Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §3513. Misuse of Agency name, initials, or seal

#### (a) Prohibited acts

No person may, except with the written permission of the Director, knowingly use the words "Central Intelligence Agency", the initials "CIA", the seal of the Central Intelligence Agency, or any colorable imitation of such words, initials, or seal in connection with any merchandise, impersonation, solicitation, or commercial activity in a manner reasonably calculated to convey the impression that such use is approved, endorsed, or authorized by the Central Intelligence Agency.

#### (b) Injunction

Whenever it appears to the Attorney General that any person is engaged or is about to engage in an act or practice which constitutes or will constitute conduct prohibited by subsection (a), the Attorney General may initiate a civil proceeding in a district court of the United States to enjoin such act or practice. Such court shall proceed as soon as practicable to the hearing and determination of such action and may, at any time before final determination, enter such restraining orders or prohibitions, or take such other action as is warranted, to prevent injury to the United States or to any person or class of persons for whose protection the action is brought.

(June 20, 1949, ch. 227, §13, as added Pub. L. 97–89, title V, §503, Dec. 4, 1981, 95 Stat. 1153.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 403m of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1981, see section 806 of Pub. L. 97–89, set out as a note under section 1621 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
#### § 550.1480 May the United States criminally prosecute me for violations under Federal oil and gas leases?

If you commit an act for which a civil penalty is provided at 30 U.S.C. 1719(d) and § 550.1460(b), the United States may pursue criminal penalties as provided at 30 U.S.C. 1720, in addition to any authority for prosecution under other statutes.
§ 71.202 Certified person; sampling. ( a ) The respirable dust sampling required by this part shall be performed by a certified person.
( b ) To be certified, a person shall complete the applicable MSHA course of instruction and pass the MSHA examination demonstrating competency in sampling procedures. Persons not certified in sampling, and those certified only in maintenance and calibration procedures in accordance with § 71.203(b), are not permitted to collect respirable dust samples required by this part or handle approved sampling devices when being used in sampling.
( c ) To maintain certification, a person must pass the MSHA examination demonstrating competency in sampling procedures every three years.
( d ) MSHA may revoke a person's certification for failing to properly carry out the required sampling procedures.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Annual report**
 
2012 | 2013| 2014 | 2015
 
SuDoc Number:VA 1.1/16:
Item Number:0983-H-10 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001008351
 
March 26, 2018