alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.361 Supplemental examination. ( a ) ( 1 ) Except for certified persons conducting examinations required by this subpart, within 3 hours before anyone enters an area in which a preshift examination has not been made for that shift, a certified person shall examine the area for hazardous conditions and violations of the mandatory health or safety standards referenced in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, determine whether the air is traveling in its proper direction and at its normal volume, and test for methane and oxygen deficiency.
( 2 ) Supplemental examinations shall include examinations to identify violations of the standards listed below: ( i ) §§ 75.202(a) and 75.220(a)(1)—roof control;
( ii ) §§ 75.333(h) and 75.370(a)(1)—ventilation, methane;
( iii ) §§ 75.400 and 75.403—accumulations of combustible materials and application of rock dust;
( iv ) § 75.1403—other safeguards, limited to maintenance of travelways along belt conveyors, off track haulage roadways, and track haulage, track switches, and other components for haulage;
( v ) § 75.1722(a)—guarding moving machine parts; and
( vi ) § 75.1731(a)—maintenance of belt conveyor components.
( b ) *Certification.* At each working place examined, the person making the supplemental examination shall certify by initials, date, and the time, that the examination was made. In areas required to be examined outby a working section, the certified person shall certify by initials, date, and the time at enough locations to show that the entire area has been examined.
[61 FR 9829, Mar. 11, 1996, as amended at 77 FR 20714, 2012]
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Devcon International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George Hare, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                             
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2006 |  | /s/ George Hare                             
|                        |  | George Hare                                 
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer                     
|                        |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Note: This certification is being furnished, not filed, as exhibit 32.2
#### § 581.7 Disclosure of information to the public.

The Secretary shall make data and information available to the public in accordance with the requirements and subject to the limitations of the Act, the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552), and the implementing regulations (30 CFR parts 580, 582, and 43 CFR part 2).
#### § 56.12001 Circuit overload protection.

Circuits shall be protected against excessive overload by fuses or circuit breakers of the correct type and capacity.
May 31, 1977.

M. P. No. 77-41.

#### Andrew J. Melechinsky *v.*William A. Laurie.

*Aram*K. Berberian, for petitioner.

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney

General, *Allen P. Rubine,*Asst. Attorney General, *Perry Shat-kin,*Chief Legal Officer, Taxation, for respondent.

Bespondent’s motion to dismiss for failure to file a brief is denied since petitioner’s brief has been filed.
### ' 

# '

- ·


# .


# ~~ AKZONOBEL

**MemoraQdu ~**  ( , To



# SANITIZED From Dat
e September

1 0, 1997

Ref. Copie

s to S u b j e c t SADT
of Trigonox 425-C75 1 . Introduction The thermal stability

of organic peroxides

is g[v!3n by the so-called
Sel

f Accerelating Decomposition Temperature (SADT). This temperature

is defined

as the lowes

t ambi

e nt temperature

at which self-

. accerelating decomposition (runaway) occurs with the peroxide

in the packaging

as used for transport. The SADT

is **use~** for safe transport, storage and handli.ng purposes. 2. Determinatibn

of the SADT The SADT
of Trigonox 425-C75 was determined

in accordance

w

i th the United Nations, Recommendations

on the Transport

of Dangerous Goods, Manual

of Tests and Criteria

, Test H4, ST/SG/AC.10/11/Rev.2. 3
. Sample description Composition Molecular formula Active Oxygen content Physical form Density Batch number 4

. Testresults Method:
Heat Accumulation Storage Test, UN test



### 1-1 .4 Conditions:

0

. 5

I cylindrical Dewar vess

. el Half-life time

· of cooling



### 7 Vz hours (with 400 rill D

i m e thylphtalat

e ) Intake 350

g (400 ml) • __ ___ 

### -~-- **QQ.~ryjltion§.;_~elf ac~!._~lafJ!I** 

**de e.~ositi**  **£1!.. "!!.**  20 

### g 

# __ _ ..,.,. _ ___ _ **~----'-- -··~-------·-···--·** 

**-~** Induction period



### > 39 hours

. No self accerelating decomposition

a t 15 

# o c Max. temp rise 2.3 

# o c (See appendix

1)

# Memorandum

Pag e2 of3 /..,...J I

"" 

# ~ty.._



# AKZONOBEL · ,

) '

:·

· 

# ~W~t-·,...

**~** .......... 

# ..,./· 5

, Conclusion 

# <i;J3SITI1/f

· - .. ·---·-
**""'" ~**  According

to the 

# Unit~d Nations, Recommendation

} on the Transport

of Dangerous

G ads

, Trigonox 425-C75 has an 

# SAf?

**.l «?.t3.Q,:**  **Ibj.~J~ mpl~s**  **t~at !~!}~,!,_.** 

**.!!,. !!~** 

cy temperature

of 10 

# oc and an C!;ontrol temperature

f 

# croc;-
fo

r transport

.
. **~** 

# ·-- **~---··**
**·---**

**·· ~**  

# ~

... '.,



# . ........... ., 

# .. 

# __ _. 

# .. . ... **,j,...- ~**  

# \ 

# I .........

. ,,.,

, ,.,, _.,, ...



# ) •

' J-L,

, 

# ~~-~-~- 

# _,
.:.._ ....... **",..., ~**  

# ·-•-·

.... -.---

.. -·--·--...--......--....,.....,

. _ **_,., ~,**  

# ....... **-~ ·-v~------------·** 

**-- -..··--·-:------** 

**......-..- ·•...-•---** 



# .. ._. ,- ........ --

... -

... **-..-~-**

**·-**
**•• -,..._,..;** 



# __ ___

. ... I 

# .. ..f.,'__Mem<nandumAKZONOBELAppendix1:HeattestresultsofTrigonox!;......'••:'0i0{-CX)0Nl"0c:(ctl'1.()(.............ctl1.()(.)I1.()N-<D-qXf0c0I.!2'..--i,I...(]J\1-....l..__:::>O.Q>..,.LL(/)(Q)....Q)0>ro.....-v0I-(/)c:0:;:::;\.ro:::lE:::l\(.)(..)ro....ro<1)I-Ntl.··-·.····-·"·-·········-·---..----·····-··-:-----'"---··-----)···--·---··-----------···--·-·_L______--------·-o0C'00N000..-'Page3of3(]J.....::l-ro.....(J)Q.E(J)-c(]J>0Ul>-ro"0(]JII......::lIro(]J.....E<V-0...:;:;E(J).....(]JQ.Eroen
Hwy 46
§ 586.101 What is the purpose of this part? The purpose of this part is to: ( a ) Establish procedures for issuance and administration of right-of-use and easement (RUE) grants for the alternate use of existing OCS facilities for energy or marine-related purposes;
( b ) Inform you and third parties of your obligations when you undertake activities authorized in this part; and
( c ) Ensure that activities involving the alternate use of OCS facilities for energy or marine-related purposes are conducted in a safe and environmentally sound manner, in conformance with the requirements of subsection 8(p) of the OCS Lands Act, other applicable laws and regulations, and the terms of your Alternate Use RUE grant.
( d ) This part will not convey access rights for oil, gas, or other minerals.
IIB 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9580 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 5, 2024 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2777 Brentwood Road in Raleigh, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Millie Dunn Veasey Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

HR 9580 RFS

1 SECTION 1. MILLIE DUNN VEASEY POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 2777 Brentwood Road in Ra4 leigh, North Carolina, shall be known and designated as 

5 the ‘‘Millie Dunn Veasey Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Millie Dunn Veasey 

10 Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 

2024. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### § 556.101 Purpose.

The purpose of the regulations in this part is to establish the procedures under which the Secretary will exercise the authority to administer a leasing program for oil and gas, and sulfur. The regulations pertaining to the procedures under which the Secretary will exercise the authority to administer a program to grant rights-of-use and easements are found in part 550 of this chapter.
§ 57.5005T Control of exposure to airborne contaminants. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 28470 , Apr. 18, 2024.
As of April 8, 2026, the following is required. Control of employee exposure to harmful airborne contaminants shall be, insofar as feasible, by prevention of contamination, removal by exhaust ventilation, or by dilution with uncontaminated air. However, where accepted engineering control measures have not been developed or when necessary by the nature of work involved (for example, while establishing controls or occasional entry into hazardous atmospheres to perform maintenance or investigation), employees may work for reasonable periods of time in concentrations of airborne contaminants exceeding permissible levels if they are protected by appropriate respiratory protective equipment. Whenever respiratory protective equipment is used, its selection, fitting, maintenance, cleaning, training, supervision, and use shall meet the following minimum requirements: ( a ) Respirators approved by NIOSH under 42 CFR part 84 which are applicable and suitable for the purpose intended shall be furnished and miners shall use the protective equipment in accordance with training and instruction.
( b ) A written respiratory protection program consistent with the requirements of ASTM F3387-19, *Standard Practice for Respiratory Protection,* approved August 1, 2019, which is incorporated by reference into this section with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. This incorporation by reference (IBR) material is available for inspection at the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) and at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Contact MSHA at: MSHA's Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances, 201 12th Street South, Arlington, VA 22202-5450; (202) 693-9440; or any Mine Safety and Health Enforcement District Office. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations* or email *fr.inspection@nara.gov .* The material may be obtained from ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959; *www.astm.org .*
( c ) When respiratory protection is used in atmospheres immediately dangerous to life or health (IDLH), the presence of at least one other person with backup equipment and rescue capability shall be required in the event of failure of the respiratory equipment.
[89 FR 28470, Apr. 18, 2024]
§ 585.105 What are my responsibilities under this part? As a lessee, applicant, operator, or holder of a ROW or RUE grant, you must: ( a ) Design your projects and conduct all activities in a manner that ensures safety and will not cause undue harm or damage to natural resources, including their physical, atmospheric, and biological components to the extent practicable; and take measures to prevent unauthorized discharge of pollutants including marine trash and debris into the offshore environment;
( b ) Submit requests, applications, plans, notices, modifications, and supplemental information to BOEM as required by this part;
( c ) Follow up, in writing, any oral request or notification you made, within 3 business days;
( d ) Comply with all applicable laws and regulations, the terms of your lease or grant under this part, reports, notices, and approved plans prepared under this part, and any conditions imposed by BOEM through its review of any of these reports, notices, and approved plans, as provided in this part;
( e ) Make all applicable payments on time;
( f ) Comply with the DOI's nonprocurement debarment regulations at 2 CFR part 1400;
( g ) Include the requirement to comply with 2 CFR part 1400 in all contracts and transactions related to a lease or grant under this part;
( h ) Conduct all activities authorized by the lease or grant in a manner consistent with the provisions of subsection 8(p) of the OCS Lands Act;
( i ) Compile, retain, and make available to BOEM representatives, within the time specified by BOEM, any data and information related to the site assessment, design, and operations of your project; and
( j ) Respond to requests from the Director in a timely manner.
Exhibit 10.251



                                 PROMISSORY NOTE
                                  (NO INTEREST)

$12,856.00                                                  Glendale, California
   June 29, 2000

     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Luz Rendon (Payor") promises to pay in lawful money of
the United States of America to Pollution Research and Control Corp., a
California corporation ("Payee"), or order, at Glendale, California, the sum of
$12,856.00 Dollars from the date hereof on the unpaid principal payable in
installments of principal only in the sum of $50.00 Dollars commencing on July
15, 2000 and payable on the same day of each month thereafter until paid in
full.

     The unpaid principal may be prepaid without penalty. Each payment hereunder
shall be credited to the principal amount.

     If each installment under this note is not paid when due, the undersigned
shall pay all costs of collection thereof, including reasonable attorneys' fees,
whether or not suit or action is commenced to enforce payment of this note, and
Payee may, at its option, declare the entire amount of the then unpaid principal
immediately due and payable if such default is not cured within 10 days after
Payee provides the undersigned written notice of such default. The undersigned
hereby waives presentment, notice of dishonor and protest.

     This note is secured by shares of Payee's common stock, no par value (the
"Shares"), pursuant to a certain Stock Pledge Agreement, dated as of June 29,
2000 (the "Pledge Agreement").

     Upon the termination of employment of Payor as an employee of Payee for any
reason, the unpaid balance of this note shall be cancelled, and the pro rata
portion of Shares which then not fully paid for, shall be returned to Payee
pursuant to the terms of the Pledge Agreement.

                                            Payor:



                                            By:  /s/  Luz Rendon
                                               --------------------------------
                                                      Luz Rendon
EXHIBIT 99.1



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") of
Double Eagle Petroleum Company (the "Company") for the quarter ended November
30, 2002, Stephen H. Hollis, the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  January 13, 2003                    /s/  Stephen H. Hollis
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Stephen H. Hollis
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 Principal Financial Officer
§ 725.11 Eligibility. ( a ) *Assumption of responsibility.* To be eligible for a grant for reimbursements for the cost of enforcing performance standards during the initial regulatory program the State shall assume responsibility for enforcement of the initial regulatory program including the specific responsibilities identified under § 710.4(b) and part 720 of this chapter.
( b ) *Designation of State agency.* In order to receive a grant for reimbursements for costs of enforcing performance standards during the initial regulatory program, the Governor of a State shall designate in writing one agency to submit grant applications, receive and administer grants under this part.
( c ) *Periods covered by reimbursement grants.* An agency may apply for a reimbursement grant for any period during the initial regulatory program and for a reasonable start-up period beginning no later than August 3, 1977.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130664 & (18) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130664 

 COA: 264488 

Macomb CC: 82-000096-FY 

CHARLES JOSEPH KELLY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 3, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motion to remand is DENIED. 

s1218 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 28, 2006 

 Clerk
#### § 49.14 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9535 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9535

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 130 South Patterson Avenue in Santa Barbara, California, as the 
     ``Brigadier General Frederick R. Lopez Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 11, 2024

 Mr. Carbajal introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 130 South Patterson Avenue in Santa Barbara, California, as the 
     ``Brigadier General Frederick R. Lopez Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BRIGADIER GENERAL FREDERICK R. LOPEZ POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 130 South Patterson Avenue in Santa Barbara, California, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Brigadier General Frederick R. 
Lopez Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Brigadier 
General Frederick R. Lopez Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6651** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. JONATHAN JIMENEZ , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Harrisonburg
. Samuel G. Wilson , District Judge. ( 5:01

- cr - 30058

- SGW

- 6 ; 5:13

- cv - 80564

- SGW

- RSB )

Submitted : August 22, 2013 Decided: August 27, 2013

Before MOTZ, DIAZ , and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Jonathan Jimenez , Appellant Pro Se
. Jeb Thomas Terrien, Assistant U nited S tates Attorney , Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jonathan Jimenez seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2013 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denie s relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independentl y reviewed the record and conclude that Jimenez has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 c ontentions are adequately present ed in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.1202-1 Temporary notations, revisions, and supplements. ( a ) Mine maps shall be revised and supplemented at intervals of not more than 6 months.
( b ) Temporary notations shall include: ( 1 ) The location of each working face of each working place;
( 2 ) Pillars mined or other such second mining;
( 3 ) Permanent ventilation controls constructed or removed, such as seals, overcasts, undercasts, regulators, and permanent stoppings, and the direction of air currents indicated;
( 4 ) Escapeways and refuge alternatives designated by means of symbols.
[35 FR 17890, Nov. 20, 1970, as amended at 73 FR 80697, Dec. 31, 2008]
#### § 746.1 Scope.

This part provides the process and requirements for the review and approval, disapproval or conditional approval of mining plans on lands containing leased Federal coal.