alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 725.17 Grant amendments. ( a ) A grant amendment is a written alteration to the grant amount, grant terms or conditions, budget or period, or other administrative, technical, or financial agreement whether accomplished on the initiative of the agency or the Director or his authorized designee or by mutual action of the agency and the Director or his authorized designee.
( b ) The agency shall promptly notify the Director or his authorized designee in writing of events or proposed changes which require a grant amendment, such as: ( 1 ) Rebudgeting;
( 2 ) Changes which may affect the approved scope or objective of a program; or
( 3 ) Changes which may increase or substantially decrease the total cost of a program.
( c ) The Director or his authorized designee shall approve or disapprove each proposed amendment within 30 days of receipt, or as soon thereafter as possible, and shall notify the agency in writing of the approval or disapproval of the amendment.
( d ) The date the Director or his authorized designee signs the grant amendment establishes the effective date of the action. If no time period is specified in the grant amendment then the amendment applies to the entire grant period.
[42 FR 62704, Dec. 13, 1977, as amended at 47 FR 38490, Aug. 31, 1982]
**Exhibit No. 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 33-60935) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-43363and File No. 333-77109) of The Peoples BancTrust Company, Inc. of our report, dated February 18, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ Mauldin & Jenkins, LLC 

 

Birmingham, Alabama 

August 26, 2005
### §4144. Fees of attorneys and agents

No remuneration on account of services rendered on behalf of any claimant in connection with any claim filed with the Commission under this subchapter shall exceed 10 per centum (or such lesser per centum as may be fixed by the Commission with respect to any class of claims) of the total amount paid pursuant to any award certified under the provisions of this subchapter on account of such claim. Any agreement to the contrary shall be unlawful and void. Whoever, in the United States or elsewhere, demands or receives, on account of services so rendered, any remuneration in excess of the maximum permitted by this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than twelve months, or both.

(July 3, 1948, ch. 826, title II, §214, as added Pub. L. 87–846, title I, §103, Oct. 22, 1962, 76 Stat. 1112.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 2017m of the former Appendix to this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
Exhibit 11

                   DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

               Consolidated Computation of Earnings Per Common
                         And Common Equivalent Share


For the Three Months Ended:                                  December 31, 1997
                                                                --------------

Net Income                                                            $(75,898)


Weighted average number of shares                                    6,047,782
Common Stock equivalent due to assumed exercise
  of stock options and warrants and deferred
  compensation plan shares

Earnings per share
 Basic                                                                  $(0.01)
 Diluted                                                                $(0.01)
 



For the Nine Months Ended:                                   December 31, 1997
                                                            ------------------

                                                                    $1,729,448
Net Income
 Plus:  amortization of redeemable stock                                11,984
                                                                     ---------
Net income available to common stockholders                         $1,741,432
                                                                     =========

Weighted average number of shares                                    5,164,808
Common Stock equivalent due to assumed exercise
  of stock options and warrants and deferred
  compensation plan shares*                                            397,576

Earnings per share
 Basic                                                                   $0.34
                                                                          ====
 Diluted                                                                 $0.31
                                                                          ====

*Due to losses incurred in the third quarter, the effect of shares attributed
to options, warrants and deferred compensation was reduced by 195,236 in
arriving at the year-to-date weighted average number of shares included in
diluted earnings per share, to avoid anti-dilution.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-82,467-01

EX PARTE STANLEY ORSON MOZEE, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. F-99-02631-TR IN THE 265 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of capital murder 

and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Mozee v.

State, No. 05-00-01260-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas Dec. 14, 2001) (not designated for publication).

Applicant contends, among other things, that the State violated Brady v. Maryland when it 1

did not disclose an alleged agreement with a jailhouse informant despite the informant’s testimony

 373 U.S. 83 (1963). 1
2

at trial that they had “no deal.” The trial court and the State agree that Applicant is entitled to relief

under Brady. 

In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334

S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. 

The trial court shall provide the trial prosecutor with the opportunity to respond to Applicant’s Brady

claim. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). 

It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. If the trial court determines he is not

represented by counsel and elects to hold a hearing, it shall then determine whether Applicant is

indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall

appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing

the response, if any, of the trial prosecutor. The trial court shall also make any other supplemental

findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of

Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court.

Filed: February 4, 2015

Do not publish
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION



I, Bernard Kravitz, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Dionics, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.





Dated:     July 14, 2008

By:

/s/ Bernard Kravitz

Bernard Kravitz,

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Granted and Order filed April 4 , 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 00265

- CV

IN RE BELINDA MORALES

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 247th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Co urt Cause No. 2011

- 64486

ORDER
This c ourt has reviewed the petition for writ of habeas corpus of relator,
Belinda Morales

. The c ourt is of the opinion that relator’s petition requires further
consideration. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(b)(3). We therefore or der the c lerk of this

c ourt to issue a writ of habeas corpus, returnable on May 20 , 2014, pending final determination of the relief requested in the petition. We further order that relator be discharged upon execution and filing of a bond as set forth belo w. See id.2 The relator will be admitted to bail upon her giving a good and sufficient bond, signed by relator as principal and her attorney, Alan B. Daughtry , as surety, conditioned as required by law, or by any other surety acceptable to the Sheriff of
H arris County, or cash in lieu of bond, in the sum of five hundred dollars ( $500.00 ) , pending the hearing on the return date of this writ, and until otherwise ordered by this c ourt

. A response to the petition is hereby requested to be filed on or before Ap ril
14 , 2014. The cause is set for submission without oral argument on May 20 , 2014.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Donovan and Brown.
COVID-19 Guidance for the Package Delivery Workforce

OSHA is committed to protecting the health and safety of America’s workers and workplaces during 

these unprecedented times. The agency will be issuing a series of industry-specific alerts designed to 

keep workers safe.

If you are in the package delivery industry, the following tips can help reduce the risk of exposure to 

the coronavirus:

 Encourage workers to stay home if they are sick. 

 Establish flexible work hours (e.g., staggered shifts) where feasible.

 Practice sensible social distancing and maintain six feet between co-workers where possible. 

 Minimize interaction between drivers and customers by leaving deliveries at loading docks, 

doorsteps, or other locations that do not require person-to-person exposures.

 Encourage respiratory etiquette, including covering coughs and sneezes.

 Promote personal hygiene. If workers do not have access to soap and water for handwashing, 

provide alcohol-based hand rubs containing at least 60 percent alcohol. Provide tissues, as 

well as disinfectants and disposable towels workers can use to clean work surfaces, including 

vehicle interiors.

 Allow workers to wear masks over their nose and mouth to prevent them from spreading the virus. 

 Discourage workers from using other workers’ tools and equipment. 

 Use Environmental Protection Agency-approved cleaning chemicals from List N or that have label 

claims against the coronavirus.

 Encourage workers to report any safety and health concerns.

For more information, visit www.osha.gov/coronavirus or call 1-800-321-OSHA (6742).

OSHA issues alerts to draw attention to 

worker safety and health issues and solutions.

 • osha.gov/coronavirus • 1-800-321-OSHA (6742) • @OSHA_DOL

OSHA 3998-04 2020
### §415a–3. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 415a–3, comprising former section 8104 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2010, Pub. L. 111–118, was editorially reclassified as a note under section 3103 of this title.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 11


STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)
(Amounts in thousands except per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        Year Ended December 31
                                                     -----------------------------
                                                       1996      1995      1994
                                                     --------  --------  ---------
<S>                                                   <C>       <C>       <C>        
Weighted average shares outstanding                    7,942     7,007     6,953
Net effect of dilutive stock options and warrants
  based on the treasury stock method (B)                 304       164         -
                                                     -------   -------   -------
Weighted average shares and common stock
  equivalents                                          8,246     7,171     6,953 (A)
                                                     -------   -------   -------
Net earnings (loss)                                   $  910    $2,314   $(2,346)

Common stock dividend to preferred shareholders (C)       (3)       (4)       (3)
                                                     -------   -------   -------
Net earnings (loss) to common shareholders            $  907    $2,310   $(2,349)
                                                     -------   -------   -------
Per share amount (D) (E)                              $ 0.11    $ 0.32   $ (0.34) 
                                                     -------   -------   -------
</TABLE>

(A)  The per share computation in 1994 is based on the weighted average number
     of shares outstanding.  No effect has been given to shares issuable upon
     the exercise of options and warrants or conversion of preferred stock as
     such inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

(B)  The fully diluted per share computation would be the same as primary
     since the average market price was greater or immaterially different than
     the ending price for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995.

(C)  In December 1996 and 1995, and September 1994, the Board of Directors
     approved a Common Stock dividend of 306, 306, and 1,545 shares to the
     stockholders of record of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock as of
     December 15, 1996, 1995, and 1994 that was paid in January 1997, 1996, and
     1995, respectively.  The  market value of the Common Stock distributed was
     approximately $3,000, $4,000 and $3,000 in the years 1996, 1995, and 1994,
     respectively.

(D)  The assumed conversion of the preferred stock would have an immaterial
     effect (less than 1/10 of $.01) in all periods, and therefore that
     calculation has been omitted.

(E)  All share and per share amounts have been restated to reflect a
     one-for-five reverse split effected November 2, 1995.
### §404l. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 404l, comprising section 117 of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as section 3054 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000028385
<NAME> THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               7
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      435
<ALLOWANCES>                                        20
<INVENTORY>                                        282
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   834
<PP&E>                                          15,205
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,589
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,735
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              954
<BONDS>                                          3,512
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        144
<COMMON>                                         1,951
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,493
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,735
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   901
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      664
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     5
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  68
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    164
<INCOME-TAX>                                        66
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 98
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        98
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Tradequest International, Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Luis
Alvarez, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

                                  /s/ Luis Alvarez
                                  ----------------
November 14, 2007                 Luis Alvarez, CEO, principal executive officer
                                  and principal accounting officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32 (a)



Citizens Financial Corp.



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



I,
Robert J. Schoonover, President and Chief Executive Officer of Citizens Financial Corp. (the company) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



|1. | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the company for the annual period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|             |  |                          |  |                        
|------------ |  | ------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: 3/9/05 |  | /s/ Robert J. Schoonover
|             |  |                          |  | President              
|             |  |                          |  | Chief Executive Officer