alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023142EN.01000101.xml

| 25.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11064 – MACQUARIE / IVANHOE / RHP PARTNERS MANAGER GP / JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 142/01)

On 17 April 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11064. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11064. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.914 How do I nominate a CVA? ( a ) As part of your design verification, fabrication verification, or installation verification plan, you must nominate a CVA for the Regional Supervisor's approval. You must specify whether the nomination is for the design, fabrication, or installation phase of verification, or for any combination of these phases.
( b ) For each CVA, you must submit a list of documents to be forwarded to the CVA, and a qualification statement that includes the following: ( 1 ) Previous experience in third-party verification or experience in the design, fabrication, installation, or major modification of offshore oil and gas platforms. This should include fixed platforms, floating platforms, manmade islands, other similar marine structures, and related systems and equipment;
( 2 ) Technical capabilities of the individual or the primary staff for the specific project;
( 3 ) Size and type of organization or corporation;
( 4 ) In-house availability of, or access to, appropriate technology. This should include computer programs, hardware, and testing materials and equipment;
( 5 ) Ability to perform the CVA functions for the specific project considering current commitments;
( 6 ) Previous experience with BSEE requirements and procedures;
( 7 ) The level of work to be performed by the CVA.
AMENDMENT TO

                      RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                      OF SAFEGUARD HEALTH ENTERPRISES, INC.

The  Corporation  was  originally  incorporated in Delaware under the name "SFGD
Reincorporation  Company"  on  April  27,  1987, and the Restated Certificate of
Incorporation  was  duly  adopted  in accordance with Section 245 and 242 of the
General Corporation Law of Delaware on October 25, 2000.  The Corporation hereby
amends  the  first  paragraph  of  Article Fourth of the Restated Certificate of
Incorporation  so  that  the  first paragraph of Article Fourth reads as follow:

"FOURTH.  The  total  number  of shares of stock that the corporation shall have
authority  to issue is Seventy-Three Million Five Hundred Thousand (73,500,000),
of  which Forty-Two Million Five Hundred Thousand (42,500,000) shares are Common
Stock,  one cent ($.01) par value per share, and Thirty-One Million (31,000,000)
shares  are  Preferred  Stock,  one  cent  ($.01)  par  value  per  share."

All  other terms of the Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation dated as
of  October  25,  2000,  shall  remain  the  same.

We  the  undersigned  do  hereby certify that the forgoing is a true and correct
Amendment  to  the  Restated  Certificate  of  Incorporation of SafeGuard Health
Enterprises,  Inc.  a  Delaware  Corporation.

Executed  as  of  the  30th  day  of  May  2002  at  Aliso  Viejo,  California.

SafeGuard  Health  Enterprises,  Inc.


   /s/  James  E.  Buncher
--------------------------------------
By:  JAMES  E.  BUNCHER
     President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer


   /s/Ronald  I.  Brendzel
---------------------------------------
By:  RONALD  I.  BRENDZEL
     Senior  Vice  President  and  Secretary


<PAGE>
----

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 7, 2009 |   /s/ John M. Lowber |
|----------------------|--------------------------------|
|                 | John M. Lowber                 |
|                 | Chief Financial Officer        |
|                 | GCI, Inc.                      |

----
P. 1



# OAR Box 

# 1790 Prepped byKeeiaRichards



### Document

Number: 

# 210 ) ll-E- 6 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 10/31/200812:43:16

PM Sheet 210of 250P. 2 

### A-90-3 7 TT-E-t p Octobe r 11 , 199 5 Not e t o Lydi a Wegma n From : Denni s Crumple r A t abou t 12:0 0 noo n today , I receive d a phon e cal l fro mAr t Fraa s o f Offic e o f Managemen t an d Budge t (OMB ) regardin g thei r positio no nFedera l Enforceabilit ya s a prerequisit e fo r limitin g potentia l t o emi t i nne wsourc e review . Ar t state d tha t OM B woul d lik e fo r EP At o accep t th e recen t appeal s cour t rulin g an d modifi yth e definitio no f potentia l t o emi t t o allo wStat e enforceabl e limit s a s sufficien t limitation s i nth e NS RRefor m rule . I sai d I woul d pas s hi s messag e alon g t o EP AManagement . cc : Bo bKella m Kare nBalnchar d Gre g Foote , OG C Davi d Solomo n Mar k Kataoka , OG C Jerr yMacLaughlin , OEC A Ti mSmit h Da ndeRoec k Mik e Sewel l Vicki e Patto n
#### § 72.710 Selection, fit, use, and maintenance of approved respirators.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 28479, Apr. 18, 2024.

The following is required until April 14, 2025. In order to ensure the maximum amount of respiratory protection, approved respirators shall be selected, fitted, used, and maintained in accordance with the provisions of the American National Standards Institute's (ANSI) *Practices for Respiratory Protection* ANSI Z88.2-1969, which is incorporated by reference into this section with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. This incorporation by reference (IBR) material is available for inspection at the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) and at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Contact MSHA at: MSHA's Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances, 201 12th Street South, Arlington, VA 22202-5450; (202) 693-9440; or any Mine Safety and Health Enforcement District Office. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations* or email *fr.inspection@nara.gov.*

[89 FR 28479, Apr. 18, 2024]
Exhibit 23.3











CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective Amendment No. 13 to the Registration Statement on Form S-14 (File No. 2-96149) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-221133) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-28631, 33-10218, 33-13210, 33-14561, 33-48781, 33-59109, 333-43478, 333-43484, 333-128494, 333-139523, 333-148070, 333-156188, 333-167516, 333-170185, 333-204477 and 333-209701) of Altria Group, Inc. of our report dated March 14, 2016, relating to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015, of Ambev S.A. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV for the year ended December 31, 2017, which is incorporated by reference into this Amendment No. 1 to Altria Group, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.  The consolidated financial statements of the Company are not separately presented in Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV’s Annual Report on Form 20-F.





São Paulo, Brazil,





May 31, 2018





/s/ DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU


Auditores Independentes
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                             [COMERICA LETTERHEAD]


October 7, 2002


Mr. W.T. ZurSchmiede, Jr,
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Federal Screw Works
20229 Nine Mile Road
St. Clair Shores, MI 48080-1775

Dear Mr. ZurSchmiede,

Per your request dated September 4, 2002 and pursuant to Section 2.13 of the
Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement between Federal Screw Works and
Comerica Bank, the Bank has approved the one year extension for the Revolving
Credit Facility and Term Loan option. The new maturity dates for the facilities
are October 31, 2005 and October 31, 2007, respectively.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.


Regards,

/s/ Robert M. Ramirez
Robert M. Ramirez


cc: Wade Plaskey
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         1151810
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6034983
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (100000)
<INVENTORY>                                    8364057
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              17233640
<PP&E>                                        20288092
<DEPRECIATION>                                11960568
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                25698712
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4307644
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       7101374
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    12225961
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  25698712
<SALES>                                        8563799
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8602027
<CGS>                                          5991708
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  9250407
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3258699
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               42435
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (690815)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     95000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (595815)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11-9

                  DTE ENERGY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
                  PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                OF COMMON STOCK




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  Three Months          Nine Months
                                                      Ended                Ended
                                               September 30, 1997   September 30, 1997
                                               ---------------------------------------
<S>                                            <C>                  <C>
                                               (Thousands, except per share amounts)

PRIMARY:
  Net Income                                      $ 131,937                $ 287,827 
  Weighted average number of common            
    shares outstanding (a)                          145,098                  145,102 
  Earnings per share of Common Stock           
    based on weighted average number           
    of shares outstanding ........................$    0.91                $    1.98 
              
FULLY DILUTED:
  Net Income .....................................$ 131,937                $ 287,827 
              
  Weighted average number of common 
    shares outstanding (a) .......................  145,098                  145,102 
  Shares issuable from assumed exercise of 
    options reduced by the number which could  
    have been purchased with the proceeds      
    from exercise of such options (a)(b) .........       17                       13 
                                                  ---------                --------- 
    ..............................................  145,115                  145,115 
                                                  =========                ========= 
                                               
  Earnings per share of Common Stock           
    based on weighted average number           
    of shared outstanding ........................$    0.91                $    1.98 
</TABLE>  

--------------
(a)  Based on a daily average.
(b)  This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K, item
     601(b)(11) although not required by footnote 2 to paragraph 14 of APB
     Opinion No. 15 because it results in dilution of less than 3%.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 14, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40474

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CESAR CALDERON,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:03-CR-170-ALL

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Cesar

Calderon has moved for leave to withdraw from representation and

has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967). Calderon has filed a response. Our independent

review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Calderon’s response

shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Although

Calderon argues in his response that his counsel was ineffective

for various reasons, the record is insufficiently developed to
No. 06-40474

-2-

allow consideration of these claims on direct appeal. See United

States v. Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 313-14 (5th Cir. 1987). 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. The Government’s

motion to dismiss is DENIED as moot.
# I

. ^^e ^ 

# ^

\p ^ 

# c < ..- ( 

# Vo,^ { [11-7--^C l Adams , Kevi n (OST) From : Sent : To :



### Cc : Subject : Attachments : Adams , Kevi n (OST ) Tuesday , Apri l 03 , 201 2 12:4 4 P M ' i \ I Mb : I ! 0 ^ 'Ada k Administrator , Stev e Mines' ; 'AdMkCM^>^l(>fificen tTutiakoff ; Adak , Cit yClerk ; Adak , CityManager , Layto n Lockett , 2012 ; Agafti?f^l^K0tfrAkuta n Administration ; Akuta n Mayor , Jo e Bereskin ; Alask a DOT , Alask a Researc h Analyst , Kevi n O'Sullivan ; 'Alask a DOT , Bria n Hanson' ; Aleu t Corp

. Exec

. Secetary, , AngelaJ^ourdukofsky ; 'Aleu tCorp. , Dav e Jensen' ; Aleutian s Eas t Boroug h Admini^tratdl* , Bd j Ja6ttRerPAhn@4-Mountains.com ; Atk a Nativ e Villag e (rosannamae@gci.net) ; Counse l i n Washingto n D.C. , Jame s Drewry ; Counsel , Washingto n D.C. , Bra d Gilman ; Nikolsk i (NVNikolski@hotmail.com) ; Juli e Dirks ; Arnol d Dushki n (ikotribeadmin@ak.net) ; Dor a Johnso n (danddclan@aol.com) ; Alask a DOT , Steve n D

. Hatter ; Robert Coh n (robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com) ; Alask a DOT , Lind a Bustamant e ; Alask a DOT , Alask a Researc h Analyst , Kevi n O'Sulliva n FLYK0DIAK@YAH00.COM ; tc91v@YAH00.COM ; 'MT C World' ; Gran tAviation , Bruc e McGlasson ; Devany , Denni s (OST ) Reques t fo rCommen tregardin g EA S proposal s atAtk a an d Nikolski , Alask a Atk a & Nikolsk i EA S 2012-03-30.docx ; Atk a & Nikolsk i EA S 2012-03-30.xlsx ; Aleutia n Proposa l fo rServan t Air.docx
Dea rMr

. Hatter , Attache d abov e ar e copie s o fth e proposal s byServan tAi ran d byGran tAviatio n t o provid e EA S a tAtk a an d Nikolski , directl yfro m th e carrie ran d a s reflecte d i n th e docket

. Contraryt o m yearlie remail , I wil l no tb e summarizin g th e proposals

. Th e comment s o fth e communitie s an d stat e ar e a criticall yimportan telemen ti n ou rcarrie rselectio n decision

. W e as k

tha t yo u ge t bac k

t o us , preferabl ybyemail , n o late rtha n Apri l 30 , 2012

. W e wil l docke tthi s email , as wel l as an yreplies

. I n brief , loo k

a t th e proposals , an d i fyo u hav e questions , cal l eithe ro fth e carrier s o rme , an d ge tbac k t o u s byth e deadline

. Best , Kevi n Adam s 

### 202-366-104 7 ^

-- S O 

# u
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

________________ _________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. MARTIN LEE PARIS, Defendant - Appellant. No. 18-3139 (D.C. No. 5:16-CV -04073-DDC & 5:03-CR-40031-DDC-1) (D. Kan.)

________________ _________________ ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

________________ _________________ Before MATHESON , BACHARACH , and PHILLIPS , Circuit Judges.

________________ _________________ This matter comes on for consideration of the Motion of the United States for Summary Affirmance and the response filed thereto by Defendant Martin Lee Paris. The United States moves for summar y affirmance of the district court’s dismissal of Mr. Paris’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 mo tion based on this court’s recen t published decision
in United States v. Pullen , 913 F.3d 1270 (10th Cir. 2019), en banc rev

. denied April 15, 2019. While Mr. Paris does not dispute that United States v. Greer , 881 F.3d 1241 (10th Cir. 2018), and Pullen control the outcome of this appeal and does not

* After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel ha s determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in t he determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is t herefore ordered submitted without oral ar gument. This order and judgme nt is not binding precedent, except under the doctr ines of law of the case, res j udicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, howev er, for its persuasive value c onsistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 a nd 10th Cir. R. 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### May 6, 2019
Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court2 contest summary affirm ance of the district court’s judgment, he reserves the right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for certiorari review. Accordingly, the government’s mo tion for summary affirmance is granted. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED

.

Entered for the Court Per Curiam
Building 141, Federal Circle **•** JF K International Airport Jamaica, NY 11430 ● (718) 656

- 2650 ● FAX: (718) 656

- 6082 September 2, 2011

United States of America Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration Washington, DC 20591

To Whom It May Concern,

North American Airlines (NOCA172S) hereby requests relief in the form of an Exemption to the requirements of 14 CFR 121.689(a)(6), which states (in part) a requirement to specify Minimum Required Fuel Supply in pounds or gallons. The aircraft Fuel Quantity Indicating Systems (FQIS), flight planning systems, and weight and balance program used by the carrier all utilize kilograms as a unit of measure. Providing the Minimum Required Fuel Supply (MFR) in kilograms on the flight release will ensure that all data related to the flight will be in a common unit of measure, thereby eliminating the possibi lity of an unintentionally incorrect fuel load.

It is the stated duty of the holder of an Air Carrier Certificate under 49 U.S.C. to “provide service with the highest possible degree of safety in the public interest”. Requiring fuel information to be

pr ovided in pounds or gallons when the aircraft fuel system, weight and balance program, and all fueling operations are performed in kilograms introduces inconsistent information into the system. This situation creates a risk of the aircraft departing with a n incorrect fuel load, a risk that is mitigated entirely by the use of a common unit of measure across the weight process.

North American Airlines intends to utilize the benefit of this proposed Exemption throughout our operating system, and respectfull y requests permission to do so during operations conducted outside the United States to maintain consistency across the operation. Approval of the requested exemption would be consistent with the latitudes applicable to Flag and Domestic Operations prescri bed by 14 CFR 121.687(a)(5), and also with the latitude granted to a previous petitioner via Exemption 10273.Building 141, Federal Circle **•** JF K International Airport Jamaica, NY 11430 ● (718) 656

- 2650 ● FAX: (718) 656

- 6082 Please contact me if you should have any questions and thank you for your assistance with our

request.

Sincerely,

Captain David P. Cu rrier

Vice President

- Operations

North American Airlines Building 141, Federal Circle JFK International Airport Jamaica, NY 11430 (718) 907

- 2151 dcurrier@flynaa.com

C: Insp. A.J. Mount (NY FSDO15); C. Hewitt; A. Travia; D. McDannell; R. Calascibetta; J. Wehrenberg
§ 57.19132 Safety catches. ( a ) A performance drop test of hoist conveyance safety catches shall be made at the time of installation, or prior to installation in a mockup of the actual installation. The test shall be certified to in writing by the manufacturer or by a registered professional engineer performing the test.
( b ) After installation and before use, and at the beginning of any seven day period during which the conveyance is to be used, the conveyance shall be suitably rested and the hoist rope slackened to test for the unrestricted functioning of the safety catches and their activating mechanisms.
( c ) The safety catches shall be inspected by a competent person at the beginning of any 24-hour period that the conveyance is to be used.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellate case name: HTS Services, Inc. v. US-UK International Supply Group, LLC, Jean 

Vallet Mobioh, and David J. Marlborough

Appellate case number: 01-19-00558-CV

Trial court case number: 1113219

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 3 of Harris County

Date motion filed: November 2, 2020

Party filing motion: Appellant

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is denied.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Julie Countiss______

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justices Kelly, Goodman, and Countiss.

Date: __November 24, 2020____