83068 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 245 / Monday, December 21, 2020 / Notices 

space, this meeting is open to the 

public. Seating for this event is limited 

due to COVID–19 restrictions and 

reservations must be made in advance to 

attend this event. Send an email request 

to Ms. Gloria Mudge at 

gloria.l.mudge.civ@mail.mil. Advanced 

security and COVID–19 screening is 

required to attend this meeting. A photo 

ID is required to enter the facility. 

COVID–19 screening and questionnaire 

will be taken at the door, facemasks are 

required and social distancing is 

mandatory. Seating is therefore limited 

and on a first come, first served basis. 

For additional information about 

public access procedures, contact the 

Alternate Designated Federal Officer, at 

the email address or telephone number 

listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section. 

Written Statements: Pursuant to 41 

CFR 102–3.105(j) and 102–3.140, and 

10(a)(3) of the Federal Advisory 

Committee Act of 1972, the public or 

interested organizations may submit 

written statements to the ASB about its 

mission and functions. Written 

statements may be submitted at any 

time or in response to the stated agenda 

of a planned meeting of the ASB. All 

written statements must be submitted to 

the Designated Federal Officer (DFO) at 

the address listed above, and this 

individual will ensure that the written 

statements are provided to the 

membership for their consideration. 

Written statements not received at least 

10 calendar days prior to the meeting 

may not be considered by the ASB prior 

to its scheduled meeting. After 

reviewing written comments, the DFO 

may choose to invite the submitter of 

the comments to orally present their 

issue during a future open meeting. 

James W. Satterwhite Jr., 

Alternate Army Federal Register Liaison 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2020–28032 Filed 12–18–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5061–AP–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

[Docket No.: ED–2020–SCC–0154] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Submission to the Office of 

Management and Budget for Review 

and Approval; Comment Request; 

Quarterly Budget and Expenditure 

Reporting Under CARES Act Sections 

18004(a)(1) Institutional Portion, 

18004(a)(2), and 18004(a)(3) 

AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary 

Education (OPE), Department of 

Education (ED). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, ED is 

proposing an extension without change 

of a currently approved collection. 

DATES: Interested persons are invited to 

submit comments on or before January 

20, 2021. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments and 

recommendations for proposed 

information collection requests should 

be sent within 30 days of publication of 

this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/ 

do/PRAMain. Find this particular 

information collection request by 

selecting ‘‘Department of Education’’ 

under ‘‘Currently Under Review,’’ then 

check ‘‘Only Show ICR for Public 

Comment’’ checkbox. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

specific questions related to collection 

activities, please contact Jack Cox, (202) 

453–6134. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Department of Education (ED), in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(2)(A)), provides the general 

public and Federal agencies with an 

opportunity to comment on proposed, 

revised, and continuing collections of 

information. This helps the Department 

assess the impact of its information 

collection requirements and minimize 

the public’s reporting burden. It also 

helps the public understand the 

Department’s information collection 

requirements and provide the requested 

data in the desired format. ED is 

soliciting comments on the proposed 

information collection request (ICR) that 

is described below. The Department of 

Education is especially interested in 

public comment addressing the 

following issues: (1) Is this collection 

necessary to the proper functions of the 

Department; (2) will this information be 

processed and used in a timely manner; 

(3) is the estimate of burden accurate; 

(4) how might the Department enhance 

the quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected; and (5) how 

might the Department minimize the 

burden of this collection on the 

respondents, including through the use 

of information technology. Please note 

that written comments received in 

response to this notice will be 

considered public records. 

Title of Collection: Quarterly Budget 

and Expenditure Reporting under 

CARES Act Sections 18004(a)(1) 

Institutional Portion, 18004(a)(2), and 

18004(a)(3). 

OMB Control Number: 1840–0849. 

Type of Review: Extension without 

change of a currently approved 

collection. 

Respondents/Affected Public: Private 

Sector; State, Local, and Tribal 

Governments. 

Total Estimated Number of Annual 

Responses: 20,680. 

Total Estimated Number of Annual 

Burden Hours: 41,360. 

Abstract: Section 18004(a)(1) of the 

CARES Act, Public Law 116–136 (March 

27, 2020), authorizes the Secretary of 

Education to allocate formula grant 

funds to participating institutions of 

higher educations (IHEs). Section 

18004(c) of the CARES Act allows the 

IHEs to use up to one-half of the total 

funds received to cover any costs 

associated with the significant changes 

to the delivery of instruction due to the 

coronavirus (with specific exceptions). 

Section 18004(a)(2) of the CARES Act 

authorizes the Secretary to make awards 

under parts A and B of title III, parts A 

and B of title V, and subpart 4 of part 

A of title VII of the Higher Education 

Act of 1965, as amended (‘‘HEA’’), to 

address needs directly related to the 

coronavirus. These awards are in 

addition to awards made in Section 

18004(a)(1) of the CARES Act. Section 

18004(a)(3) of the CARES Act, Pub. 

authorizes the Secretary to allocate 

funds for part B of Title VII of the HEA, 

for IHEs that the Secretary determines 

have the greatest unmet needs related to 

coronavirus. This information collection 

request includes the quarterly budget 

and expenditure reporting form that will 

be used by grantees under these 

sections. This collection is currently 

approved under emergency processing; 

we are now requesting an extension of 

the approved collection under regular 

processing. 

Dated: December 15, 2020. 

Kate Mullan, 

PRA Coordinator, Strategic Collections and 

Clearance, Governance and Strategy Division, 

Office of Chief Data Officer, Office of 

Planning, Evaluation and Policy 

Development. 

[FR Doc. 2020–28000 Filed 12–18–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Notice of Availability of Draft Versatile 

Test Reactor Environmental Impact 

Statement 

AGENCY: Office of Nuclear Energy, 

Department of Energy. 

ACTION: Notice of availability and public 

hearings. 

Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 245 / Monday, December 21, 2020 / Notices 83069 

1Fast neutrons are highly energetic neutrons 

(ranging from 0.1 to 10 million electron volts [MeV] 

and travelling at speeds of thousands to tens of 

thousands kilometers per second) emitted during 

fission. The fast-neutron spectrum refers to the 

range of energies associated with fast neutrons. By 

contrast, thermal neutrons, such as those typically 

associated in a commercial light-water reactor, are 

neutrons that are less energetic than fast neutrons 

(more than a million times less energetic [about 

0.25eV] and travelling at speeds of less than 5 

kilometers per second), having been slowed by 

collisions with other materials such as water. The 

thermal neutron spectrum refers to the range of 

energies associated with thermal neutrons. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Energy (DOE) announces the availability 

of the Draft Versatile Test Reactor 

Environmental Impact Statement (VTR 

EIS) (DOE/EIS–0542). DOE is also 

announcing a public comment period 

and public hearings to receive 

comments on the Draft VTR EIS. DOE 

prepared the Draft VTR EIS to evaluate 

the potential environmental impacts of 

alternatives for constructing and 

operating a versatile test reactor (VTR), 

and the associated facilities for postirradiation examination of test and 

experimental fuels and materials. The 

Draft VTR EIS also evaluates the 

potential environmental impacts of 

options for VTR driver fuel (the fuel that 

powers the reactor) fabrication and the 

management of spent nuclear fuel from 

the VTR. 

DATES: Comments will be accepted 

during the comment period that will 

extend for 45 days after the date that the 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

publishes its Notice of Availability in 

the Federal Register (expected to be 

December 31, 2020). DOE plans to hold 

two public hearings on the Draft VTR 

EIS. In light of ongoing public health 

concerns, DOE will host internet-based, 

virtual public hearings in place of inperson hearings. The dates of the 

hearing will be provided in a future 

notice posted on the following website: 

https://www.energy.gov/ne/nuclearreactor-technologies/versatile-testreactor. DOE will hold the hearings no 

earlier than 15 days from the posting of 

the notice. 

ADDRESSES: DOE invites Federal and 

state agencies, state and local 

governments, Native American tribes, 

industry, other organizations, and 

members of the public to review and 

submit comments on the Draft VTR EIS. 

Written comments on the Draft VTR EIS 

should be sent to Mr. James Lovejoy, 

Document Manager, by mail at: U.S. 

Department of Energy, Idaho Operations 

Office, 1955 Fremont Avenue, MS 1235, 

Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415; or by email to 

VTR.EIS@nuclear.energy.gov. The Draft 

VTR EIS is available for viewing or 

download at https://www.energy.gov/ 

nepa or https://www.energy.gov/ne/ 

nuclear-reactor-technologies/versatiletest-reactor. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

information regarding the VTR Project 

or the Draft VTR EIS, visit https://

www.energy.gov/ne/nuclear-reactortechnologies/versatile-test-reactor; or 

contact Mr. James Lovejoy at the mailing 

address listed in ADDRESSESS; or via 

email at VTR.EIS@nuclear.energy.gov; 

or call (208) 526–6805. For general 

information on DOE’s NEPA process, 

contact Mr. Jason Sturm at the mailing 

address listed in ADDRESSES; or via 

email at VTR.EIS@nuclear.energy.gov; 

or call (208) 526–6805. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Part of the DOE mission is to ensure 

America’s security and prosperity by 

addressing its energy, environmental 

and nuclear challenges through 

transformative science and technology 

solutions. Many commercial 

organizations and universities are 

pursuing advanced nuclear energy fuels, 

materials, and reactor designs that 

complement the efforts of DOE and its 

laboratories in advancing nuclear 

energy. These designs include thermal 

and fast-spectrum 1 reactors targeting 

improved fuel resource utilization and 

waste management, and utilizing 

materials other than water for cooling. 

Their development requires an adequate 

infrastructure for experimentation, 

testing, design evolution, and 

component qualification. Existing 

irradiation test capabilities are aging, 

and some are over 50 years old. The 

existing capabilities are focused on 

testing of materials, fuels, and 

components in the thermal neutron 

spectrum and do not have the ability to 

support the testing needs for fast 

reactors. Only limited fast-neutronspectrum-testing capabilities, with 

restricted availability, exist outside the 

United States. To meet its obligation to 

support advanced reactor technology 

development, DOE needs to develop the 

capability for large-scale testing, 

accelerated testing, and qualification of 

advanced nuclear fuels, materials, 

instrumentation and sensors. This 

testing capability is essential for the 

United States to modernize its nuclear 

energy infrastructure and for developing 

transformational nuclear energy 

technologies that re-establish the U.S. as 

a world leader in nuclear technology 

commercialization. 

Recognizing that the United States 

does not have a dedicated fast-neutronspectrum testing capability, DOE 

performed a mission needs assessment 

to assess current testing capabilities 

(domestic and foreign) against the 

required testing capabilities to support 

the development of advanced nuclear 

technologies. This needs assessment 

was consistent with the Nuclear Energy 

Innovation Capabilities Act (NEICA) 

(Pub. L. 115–248) passed in 2018, which 

directed DOE to assess the mission need 

for, and cost of, a versatile reactor-based 

fast-neutron source with a high neutron 

flux, irradiation flexibility, multiple 

experimental environment (e.g., coolant) 

capabilities, and volume for many 

concurrent users. The needs assessment 

identified a gap between required 

testing needs and existing capabilities. 

That is, there currently is an inability to 

effectively test advanced nuclear fuels 

and materials in a fast-neutron spectrum 

irradiation environment at high neutron 

fluxes. Specifically, the DOE Office of 

Nuclear Energy (NE), Nuclear Energy 

Advisory Committee (NEAC) report, 

Assessment of Missions and 

Requirements for a New U.S. Test 

Reactor, confirmed that there was a 

need in the U.S. for fast-neutron testing 

capabilities, but that there is no facility 

that is readily available domestically or 

internationally. The NEAC study 

confirmed the conclusions of an earlier 

study, the Advanced Demonstration and 

Test Reactor Options Study. That study 

established the strategic objective that 

DOE ‘‘provide an irradiation test reactor 

to support development and 

qualification of fuels, materials, and 

other important components/items (e.g., 

control rods, instrumentation) of both 

thermal and fast neutron-based 

advanced reactor systems.’’ 

Following establishment of the 

mission need described above, the VTR 

Project was formally launched in 

February 2019 as a part of the effort 

called for by Congress to modernize the 

nuclear energy research and 

development user facility infrastructure 

in the United States. 

Alternatives 

In addition to a No Action 

Alternative, the Draft VTR EIS evaluates 

potential environmental impacts of 

alternatives for constructing and 

operating a VTR. Under the action 

alternatives, the VTR would be a small 

(approximately 300 megawatt thermal) 

sodium-cooled, pool-type, metal-fueled 

reactor. DOE has completed a 

conceptual design of a fast-neutronspectrum reactor based on the Power 

Reactor Innovative Small Module 

(PRISM) design from GE-Hitachi. In 

addition to constructing and operating 

the VTR, the action alternatives include 

the activities necessary to perform postirradiation examination of test 

83070 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 245 / Monday, December 21, 2020 / Notices 

specimens and for the management of 

driver fuel from the VTR. After 

irradiation in the VTR, test specimens/ 

experimental cartridges would be 

transferred to post-irradiation 

examination facilities where they would 

be disassembled so that the specimens 

can undergo detailed evaluation. To the 

extent practical, DOE would make use 

of existing facilities to perform postirradiation examination. Spent driver 

fuel would be removed from the VTR 

each year over its 60-year operating life. 

The fuel would be treated (to remove 

sodium that is used as a bonding 

material in fabrication of the fuel) and 

packaged in containers that are ready for 

transport to an offsite storage facility or 

repository. Pending shipment offsite, 

the packaged spent fuel would be stored 

at a facility provided by the VTR 

project. These activities would be part 

of each action alternative. The 

alternatives evaluated include 

establishing the VTR and support 

activities at Idaho National Laboratory 

(INL) or Oak Ridge National Laboratory 

(ORNL). 

Idaho National Laboratory Versatile 

Test Reactor Alternative 

Under the INL VTR Alternative, DOE 

would site the VTR adjacent to the 

Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) at 

INL and use existing hot cell and other 

facilities at the MFC for post-irradiation 

examination. The MFC is the location of 

the Hot Fuel Examination Facility 

(HFEF), the Irradiated Materials 

Characterization Laboratory (IMCL), the 

Experimental Fuels Facility (EFF), and 

other laboratory facilities. Spent driver 

fuel would be treated at the Fuel 

Conditioning Facility (FCF) and stored 

at a facility constructed as part of the 

VTR project. 

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Versatile 

Test Reactor Alternative 

Under the ORNL VTR Alternative, the 

VTR would be sited at ORNL at a 

location about three quarters of a mile 

northeast of the High Flux Isotope 

Reactor. In addition to constructing the 

VTR and a facility to store spent driver 

fuel, DOE would also construct a new 

hot cell facility at this location. The hot 

cell facility would include capability 

and capacity for the initial postirradiation disassembly and 

examination of test specimens and for 

the treatment of spent VTR driver fuel. 

Several existing facilities at ORNL 

would be used to provide additional 

post-irradiation examination 

capabilities. Hot cells in the Irradiated 

Fuels Examination Laboratory and the 

Irradiated Materials Examination and 

Testing Facility would augment the 

capabilities in the new hot cell facility. 

In addition, the Low Activation 

Materials Design and Analysis 

Laboratory would be used for testing 

low-dose samples that do not require 

the use of hot cells. 

Reactor Fuel Production 

The driver fuel for the VTR would be 

a metal alloy composed of uranium, 

plutonium, and zirconium. Activities to 

produce reactor fuel may include 

feedstock preparation and well as fuel 

fabrication. The Draft VTR EIS evaluates 

the potential environmental impacts of 

the feedstock preparation activities that 

would be used to remove contaminants 

from the plutonium (called polishing) 

and to convert plutonium oxides to 

metal that can be used in fuel 

fabrication. The fabrication steps 

include creating the alloy; casting the 

alloy to create fuel slugs; fabricating fuel 

pins, including establishing a sodium 

bond between the fuel slugs and the 

encasing tube; and assembling the tube 

bundles that would be placed in the 

reactor. DOE evaluates two options for 

each phase of reactor fuel production. 

The feedstock preparation could be 

performed at either INL or the Savanah 

River Site (SRS). Similarly, fuel 

fabrication activities could be performed 

at INL or SRS. 

Under the options to perform 

feedstock preparation and fuel 

fabrication at INL, new and existing 

gloveboxes and equipment would be 

used in the Fuel Manufacturing Facility 

and the building that previously housed 

the Zero Power Physics Reactor. Under 

the options to perform feedstock 

preparation and fuel fabrication at SRS, 

new gloveboxes and equipment would 

be installed in a building that 

previously housed one of the SRS 

production reactors. 

Preferred Alternative 

DOE’s Preferred Alternative is the INL 

VTR Alternative. DOE would build and 

operate the VTR at the INL Site adjacent 

to the existing MFC. Existing facilities 

within the MFC would be used for postirradiation examination of test 

specimens. Post-irradiation examination 

would be performed in HFEF, IMCL, 

and other MFC facilities. Spent nuclear 

fuel (spent VTR driver fuel) would be 

treated to remove the sodium-bonded 

material at FCF (modifications to FCF 

may be required). The intent of this 

treatment is to condition and transform 

the spent nuclear fuel into a form that 

would meet the acceptance criteria for 

a future permanent repository. This 

treated fuel would be temporarily stored 

at a new VTR spent fuel pad at MFC. 

DOE has no preferred options at this 

time for where it would perform driver 

fuel production (i.e., feedstock 

preparation and driver fuel fabrication) 

for the VTR. DOE evaluated options for 

both processes at the INL Site and at 

SRS. DOE could choose to use either 

site or a combination of both sites to 

implement either option. DOE will state 

its preferred options for feedstock 

preparation and driver fuel fabrication 

in the Final VTR EIS, if preferred 

options are identified before issuance. 

Webcast Public Hearings 

DOE will host two interactive webcast 

public hearings during the public 

comment period. During the webcast 

public hearings, DOE will give a brief 

presentation on the Draft VTR EIS, 

followed by a period during which DOE 

will accept oral comments on the Draft 

VTR EIS. The comments will be 

transcribed. There will also be a phone 

line available to allow people who do 

not have an internet connection the 

opportunity to participate. Note that 

those desiring to provide oral comments 

will need to call in on the phone line. 

Written comments on the Draft VTR EIS 

may also be submitted during the public 

comment period as indicated under 

ADDRESSES. All comments, whether oral 

or written, will be considered by DOE 

as the VTR EIS is finalized. DOE will 

post information regarding the public 

hearings on the VTR Draft EIS website 

at https://www.energy.gov/ne/nuclearreactor-technologies/versatile-testreactor. The hearings will also be 

announced in newspapers near INL, 

ORNL, and SRS. 

Signing Authority 

This document of the Department of 

Energy was signed on December 15, 

2020, by Robert Boston, DOE Idaho 

Operations Office Manager, Office of 

Nuclear Energy, pursuant to delegated 

authority from the Secretary of Energy. 

That document with the original 

signature and date is maintained by 

DOE. For administrative purposes only, 

and in compliance with requirements of 

the Office of the Federal Register, the 

undersigned DOE Federal Register 

Liaison Officer has been authorized to 

sign and submit the document in 

electronic format for publication, as an 

official document of the Department of 

Energy. This administrative process in 

no way alters the legal effect of this 

document upon publication in the 

Federal Register. 

Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 245 / Monday, December 21, 2020 / Notices 83071 

Signed in Washington, DC, on December 

15, 2020. 

Treena V. Garrett, 

Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. 

Department of Energy. 

[FR Doc. 2020–27951 Filed 12–18–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

Combined Notice of Filings #1 

Take notice that the Commission 

received the following electric corporate 

filings: 

Docket Numbers: EC21–34–000. 

Applicants: Kings Point Wind, LLC, 

The Empire District Electric Company. 

Description: Application for 

Authorization Under Section 203 of the 

Federal Power Act of Kings Point Wind, 

LLC, et. al. 

Filed Date: 12/14/20. 

Accession Number: 20201214–5219. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/4/21. 

Take notice that the Commission 

received the following exempt 

wholesale generator filings: 

Docket Numbers: EG21–54–000. 

Applicants: PGR Lessee O, LLC. 

Description: Self-Certification of 

exempt Wholesale Generator of PGR 

Lessee O, LLC. 

Filed Date: 12/14/20. 

Accession Number: 20201214–5161. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/4/21. 

Take notice that the Commission 

received the following electric rate 

filings: 

Docket Numbers: ER10–2302–009. 

Applicants: Public Service Company 

of New Mexico. 

Description: Compliance filing: PNM 

Compliance Filing with November 13, 

2020 Order to be effective 11/13/2020. 

Filed Date: 12/14/20. 

Accession Number: 20201214–5185. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/4/21. 

Docket Numbers: ER19–2674–002. 

Applicants: New Mexico PPA 

Corporation. 

Description: Compliance filing: MBR 

Filing in Compliance with November 

13, 2020 Order to be effective 11/13/ 

2020. 

Filed Date: 12/14/20. 

Accession Number: 20201214–5172. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/4/21. 

Docket Numbers: ER20–860–003. 

Applicants: Green River Wind Farm 

Phase 1, LLC. 

Description: Compliance filing: 

Reactive Power Compliance Filing to be 

effective 3/22/2020. 

Filed Date: 12/15/20. 

Accession Number: 20201215–5087. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/5/21. 

Docket Numbers: ER20–1890–003. 

Applicants: California Independent 

System Operator Corporation. 

Description: Compliance filing: 2020– 

12–15 Intertie Deviation Settlement— 

Compliance Filing to be effective 1/1/ 

2021. 

Filed Date: 12/15/20. 

Accession Number: 20201215–5102. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/5/21. 

Docket Numbers: ER21–244–001. 

Applicants: Duke Energy Carolinas, 

LLC. 

Description: Tariff Amendment: Errata 

to Correct Location—DEC RS No. 318 

Amendment 2021 to be effective 1/1/ 

2021. 

Filed Date: 12/14/20. 

Accession Number: 20201214–5169. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/21/21. 

Docket Numbers: ER21–645–000. 

Applicants: TransWest Express LLC. 

Description: Application for 

authorization to sell transmission 

service rights at negotiated rates, request 

for approval of capacity allocation 

process, and request for waivers of 

TransWest Express LLC. 

Filed Date: 12/11/20. 

Accession Number: 20201211–5208. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/4/21. 

Docket Numbers: ER21–647–000. 

Applicants: Arizona Public Service 

Company. 

Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing: Rate 

Schedule No. 265, Amendment No. 3_

PV—Morgan Joint Participation to be 

effective 2/15/2021. 

Filed Date: 12/15/20. 

Accession Number: 20201215–5083. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/5/21. 

Docket Numbers: ER21–648–000. 

Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, 

Inc. 

Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing: 

Revisions to Bylaws and Membership 

Agreement Regarding Partial 

Terminations to be effective 3/1/2021. 

Filed Date: 12/15/20. 

Accession Number: 20201215–5099. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/5/21. 

Docket Numbers: ER21–649–000. 

Applicants: California Independent 

System Operator Corporation. 

Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing: 

2020–12–15 Rate Schedule No. 50 COI– 

POA to be effective 1/1/2021. 

Filed Date: 12/15/20. 

Accession Number: 20201215–5103. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/5/21. 

Docket Numbers: ER21–650–000. 

Applicants: Rail Splitter Wind Farm II 

LLC. 

Description: Request for Prospective 

One-Time, Limited Waiver of Tariff 

Provisions, et al. of Rail Splitter Wind 

Farm II LLC. 

Filed Date: 12/14/20. 

Accession Number: 20201214–5241. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/24/21. 

Docket Numbers: ER21–651–000. 

Applicants: The Connecticut Light 

and Power Company. 

Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing: 

Eastern CT Resource Recovery 

Authority Small Generator 

Interconnection Agreement to be 

effective 12/15/2020. 

Filed Date: 12/15/20. 

Accession Number: 20201215–5139. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/5/21. 

The filings are accessible in the 

Commission’s eLibrary system (https://

elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/ 

fercgensearch.asp) by querying the 

docket number. 

Any person desiring to intervene or 

protest in any of the above proceedings 

must file in accordance with Rules 211 

and 214 of the Commission’s 

Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 

385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern 

time on the specified comment date. 

Protests may be considered, but 

intervention is necessary to become a 

party to the proceeding. 

eFiling is encouraged. More detailed 

information relating to filing 

requirements, interventions, protests, 

service, and qualifying facilities filings 

can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/ 

docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For 

other information, call (866) 208–3676 

(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. 

Dated: December 15, 2020. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2020–28088 Filed 12–18–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket No. EL21–26–000] 

New England Power Generators 

Association, Inc. v. ISO New England, 

Inc.; Notice of Complaint 

Take notice that on December 11, 

2020, pursuant to sections 206, 306, and 

309 of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 

824e, 825e, 825h and Rule 206 of the 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission’s (Commission) Rules of 

Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.206, 

New England Power Generators 

Association, Inc. (Complainant) filed a 

formal complaint against ISO New 

England, Inc., (Respondent) alleging 

that, Respondent has violated its tariff