alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 11280]

      ( print page 82565)    
Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(a)(ii)(B) of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 2003, and Executive Order 13886 of September 9, 2019, I hereby determine that the person known as Ashraf al-Qizani, also known as Ashraf al-Gizani, also known as Abu `Ubaydah al-Kafi, also known as Achref Ben Fethi Ben Mabrouk Guizani, also known as Achraf Ben Fathi Ben Mabrouk Guizani, is a foreign person who is a leader of leader of Jund al-Khilafah in Tunisia (JAK-T), a group whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to a prior determination by the Secretary of State pursuant to Executive Order 13224.

Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 13224 that prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously, I determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the measures authorized in the Order.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: November 27, 2020.

Michael R. Pompeo,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2020-27846 Filed 12-17-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsMultidisciplinary Approach to Aerospike Nozzle DesignA model of a linear aerospike rocket nozzle that consists of coupled aerodynamic and structural analyses has been developed. A nonlinear computational fluid dynamics code is used to calculate the aerodynamic thrust, and a three-dimensional finite-element model is used to determine the structural response and weight. The model will be used to demonstrate multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) capabilities for relevant engine concepts, assess performance of various MDO approaches, and provide a guide for future application development. In this study, the MDO problem is formulated using the multidisciplinary feasible (MDF) strategy. The results for the MDF formulation are presented with comparisons against separate aerodynamic and structural optimized designs. Significant improvements are demonstrated by using a multidisciplinary approach in comparison with the single-discipline design strategy.Document ID19970014941Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsKorte, J. J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Salas, A. O.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Dunn, H. J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Alexandrov, N. M.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Follett, W. W.*(Boeing North American, Inc. Canoga Park, CA United States)*Orient, G. E.*(Boeing North American, Inc. Canoga Park, CA United States)*Hadid, A. H.*(Boeing North American, Inc. Canoga Park, CA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1997Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:110326NASA-TM-110326Accession Number97N18139Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 522-31-41-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970014941.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 57.19068 Orderly conduct in conveyances.

Persons shall enter, ride, and leave conveyances in an orderly manner.
### §§321 to 331. Repealed. Aug. 9, 1955, ch. 656, title III, §307, 69 Stat. 589

Section 321, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title II, §201, as added Apr. 1, 1944, ch. 150, 58 Stat. 136; amended Apr. 19, 1946, ch. 142, 60 Stat. 96, related to State absentee voting legislation.

Section 322, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title II, §202, as added Apr. 1, 1944, ch. 150, 58 Stat. 137; amended Apr. 19, 1946, ch. 142, 60 Stat. 96, related to use of post cards.

Section 323, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title II, §203, as added Apr. 1, 1944, ch. 150, 58 Stat. 137; amended Apr. 19, 1946, ch. 142, 60 Stat. 97, related to distribution of ballots.

Section 324, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title II, §204, as added Apr. 1, 1944, ch. 150, 58 Stat. 138; amended Apr. 19, 1946, ch. 142, 60 Stat. 97; Sept. 29, 1950, ch. 1112, §1, 64 Stat. 1082, provided for style and markings of envelopes, protective inserts, return envelopes, and size and weight of ballots and envelopes.

Section 325, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title II, §205, as added Apr. 1, 1944, ch. 150, 58 Stat. 138; amended Apr. 19, 1946, ch. 142, 60 Stat. 97, related to signature and oath of voter.

Section 326, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title II, §206, as added Apr. 1, 1944, ch. 150, 58 Stat. 139; amended Apr. 19, 1946, ch. 142, 60 Stat. 98, related to instructions for marking ballots.

Section 327, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title II, §207, as added Apr. 1, 1944, ch. 150, 58 Stat. 139; amended Apr. 19, 1946, ch. 142, 60 Stat. 99, related to extension of State's time limits.

Section 328, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title II, §208, as added Apr. 19, 1946, ch. 142, 60 Stat. 99, provided for notification of forthcoming elections by secretaries of states.

Section 329, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title II, §209, as added Apr. 19, 1946, ch. 142, 60 Stat. 99; amended Sept. 29, 1950, ch. 1111, 64 Stat. 1082, provided for cooperation with States, printing and transmitting of post cards, and content of post cards.

Section 330, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title II, §210, as added Apr. 19, 1946, ch. 142, 60 Stat. 101; amended July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501, related to transmission of post cards.

Section 331, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title II, §211, as added Apr. 19, 1946, ch. 142, 60 Stat. 101; amended July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501, related to distribution of information.

A prior section 331, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title III, §301, as added Apr. 1, 1944, ch. 150, 58 Stat. 140, related to establishment of United States War Ballot Commission and was repealed by act Apr. 19, 1946, ch. 142, 60 Stat. 96.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Additional Repeal

Sections 321 to 331 were also repealed by act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §53, 70A Stat. 641.
### §44732. Prohibition on personal use of electronic devices on flight deck

(a) In General.—It is unlawful for a flight crewmember of an aircraft used to provide air transportation under part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, to use a personal wireless communications device or laptop computer while at the flight crewmember's duty station on the flight deck of such an aircraft while the aircraft is being operated.

(b) Exceptions.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to the use of a personal wireless communications device or laptop computer for a purpose directly related to operation of the aircraft, or for emergency, safety-related, or employment-related communications, in accordance with procedures established by the air carrier and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration.

(c) Enforcement.—In addition to the penalties provided under section 46301 applicable to any violation of this section, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration may enforce compliance with this section under section 44709 by amending, modifying, suspending, or revoking a certificate under this chapter.

(d) Personal Wireless Communications Device Defined.—In this section, the term "personal wireless communications device" means a device through which personal wireless services (as defined in section 332(c)(7)(C)(i) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 332(c)(7)(C)(i))) are transmitted.

(Added Pub. L. 112–95, title III, §307(a), Feb. 14, 2012, 126 Stat. 61.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Regulations

Pub. L. 112–95, title III, §307(d), Feb. 14, 2012, 126 Stat. 62, provided that: "Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Feb. 14, 2012], the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall initiate a rulemaking procedure for regulations to carry out section 44732 of title 49, United States Code (as added by this section), and shall issue a final rule thereunder not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act."
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

EXHIBIT 21


SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME                                               JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
--------------------------------------------       -----------------------------
<S>                                                <C>
Integra Bank NA                                    United States
 * IBNK Leasing Corp.                              State of Indiana
 * Integra Illinois Investment Co., LLC            State of Delaware
 ** Integra Loan Company, LLC                      State of Delaware
 *** Total Title Services, LLC                     State of Indiana
Integra Capital Trust II                           State of Delaware
Integra Capital Statutory Trust III                State of Connecticut
Integra Reinsurance Company, LTD                   Turks and Caicos Islands
</TABLE>

*   - Wholly owned subsidiary of Integra Bank NA
**  - Ninety-nine percent owned by Integra Illinois Investment Co., LLC and one
      percent owned by Integra Bank NA
*** - Seventy-one percent ownership by Integra Bank NA
§ 735.19 Grant agreement. ( a ) If the Director or his authorized designee approves an agency's grant application, the Director or his authorized designee shall prepare a grant agreement which includes— ( 1 ) The approved scope of the program to be covered by the grant;
( 2 ) The approved budget, including the Federal share;
( 3 ) Commencement and completion dates for the segment of the program covered by the grant and for major phases of the program to be completed during the grant period; and
( 4 ) Permissible transfers of funds to other State agencies.
( b ) The Director or his authorized designee may permit an agency to assign functions and funds to other State agencies. The Director or his authorized designee shall require the grantee agency to retain responsibility for overall administration of the grant, including use of funds, accomplishment of functions and reporting.
( c ) Pre-agreement costs for program development grants shall be allowed only as specified in the grant agreement.
( d ) The Director or his authorized designee shall transmit four copies of the grant agreement by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the agency for signature. The agency shall execute the grant agreement and return all copies of it within 3 calendar weeks after receipt, or within an extension of such time that may be granted by the Director or his authorized designee.
( e ) The Director or his authorized designee shall sign the grant agreement upon its return from the agency and return one copy to the agency. The grant is effective and constitutes an obligation of Federal funds in the amount and for the purposes stated in the grant agreement at the time the Director or his authorized designee signs the agreement.
( f ) Neither the approval of a program nor the award of any grant will commit or obligate the United States to award any continuation grant or enter into any grant amendment, including grant increases to cover cost overruns.
### §403e–1. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 403e–1, comprising section 402 of the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1984, Pub. L. 98–215, was editorially reclassified as section 3323 of this title.
§ 62.130 Permissible exposure level. ( a ) The mine operator must assure that no miner is exposed during any work shift to noise that exceeds the permissible exposure level. If during any work shift a miner's noise exposure exceeds the permissible exposure level, the mine operator must use all feasible engineering and administrative controls to reduce the miner's noise exposure to the permissible exposure level, and enroll the miner in a hearing conservation program that complies with § 62.150 of this part. When a mine operator uses administrative controls to reduce a miner's exposure, the mine operator must post the procedures for such controls on the mine bulletin board and provide a copy to the affected miner.
( b ) If a miner's noise exposure continues to exceed the permissible exposure level despite the use of all feasible engineering and administrative controls, the mine operator must continue to use the engineering and administrative controls to reduce the miner's noise exposure to as low a level as is feasible.
( c ) The mine operator must assure that no miner is exposed at any time to sound levels exceeding 115 dBA, as determined without adjustment for the use of any hearing protector.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFlight data results of estimate fusion for spacecraft rendezvous navigation from shuttle mission STS-69A recently developed rendezvous navigation fusion filter that optimally exploits existing distributed filters for rendezvous and GPS navigation to achieve the relative and inertial state accuracies of both in a global solution is utilized here to process actual flight data. Space Shuttle Mission STS-69 was the first mission to date which gathered data from both the rendezvous and Global Positioning System filters allowing, for the first time, a test of the fusion algorithm with real flight data. Furthermore, a precise best estimate of trajectory is available for portions of STS-69, making possible a check on the performance of the fusion filter. In order to successfully carry out this experiment with flight data, two extensions to the existing scheme were necessary: a fusion edit test based on differences between the filter state vectors, and an underweighting scheme to accommodate the suboptimal perfect target assumption made by the Shuttle rendezvous filter. With these innovations, the flight data was successfully fused from playbacks of downlinked and/or recorded measurement data through ground analysis versions of the Shuttle rendezvous filter and a GPS filter developed for another experiment. The fusion results agree with the best estimate of trajectory at approximately the levels of uncertainty expected from the fusion filter's covariance matrix.Document ID19960041500Acquisition SourceJohnson Space CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsCarpenter, J. Russell*(NASA Johnson Space Center Houston, TX United States)*Bishop, Robert H.*(Texas Univ. Austin, TX United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1996Subject CategorySpace Communications, Spacecraft Communications, Command And TrackingReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-111666NAS 1.15:111666Accession Number96N31437Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC9-547-90Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19960041500.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 16.1





August 17, 2009








Securities and Exchange Commission


Washington, D.C. 20549








Ladies and Gentlemen:





We were previously principal accountants for GCI, Inc. and, under the date of March 20, 2009, we reported on the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.  On August 11, 2009, we were dismissed.  We have read the Company’s statements included under Item 4.01a
of its Form 8-K dated August 17, 2009, and we agree with such statements, except we are not in a position to agree or disagree with the Company’s statements that the change was based upon a decision by the Board of Directors.





Very truly yours,





(signed) KPMG LLP





KPMG LLP
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.160 Training programs.
(October 27, 1960)

#### Manco Distributors, Inc., Respondent, v. Bigelow-Sanford Carpet Company, Inc., Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. Memorandum: Motions under rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice to strike out a part of a complaint as sham or irrelevant are not favored and they will not be granted in the absence of a clear showing that the allegations have no possible bearing upon the subject matter of the litigation and that substantial prejudice will result if the allegations objected to are npt stricken out (4 Carmody-Wait, New York ¡Practice, pp. 756-767, and cases there cited). There was no such showing here. The question sought to be raised by the appellant can be adequately dealt with by the trial court, without prejudice to the appellant. In affirming the order, we do not express any opinion as to the admissibility of evidence to support the allegations of the complaint attacked by the motion. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Special Term denying defendant’s motion to strike certain paragraphs from plaintiff’s amended complaint.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
§ 580.51 What types of geophysical data and information must I submit to BOEM? Unless the Regional Director specifies otherwise, you must include: ( a ) An accurate and complete record of each geophysical survey conducted under the permit, including digital navigational data and final location maps;
( b ) All seismic data collected under a permit presented in a format and of a quality suitable for processing;
( c ) Processed geophysical information derived from seismic data with extraneous signals and interference removed, presented in a quality format suitable for interpretive evaluation, reflecting state-of-the-art processing techniques; and
( d ) Other geophysical data, processed geophysical information, and interpreted geophysical information including, but not limited to, shallow and deep subbottom profiles, bathymetry, sidescan sonar, gravity and magnetic surveys, and special studies such as refraction and velocity surveys.
AMENDMENT DATED 6/25/02 TO PRO. NOTE DATED 10/1/01



 Exhibit 10.37 
 AMENDMENT

  
 This AMENDMENT No. 1, dated June 25, 2002, to Promissory Note (the “Note”) dated July 2, 2001 by
Gregory Fischbach (“Payor”) and Acclaim Entertainment, Inc. (“Payee”). 
  
 The parties hereto
hereby agree as follows: 
  
 1.    The first full paragraph of the Note is hereby amended and
restated in its entirety as follows: 
  
 “FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the Payor hereby unconditionally promises
to pay to the order of the Payee, the principal amount of ONE MILLION SEVEN HUNDRED NINETY SEVEN THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS ($1,797,450) together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon. The Payor further agrees to pay interest on such
principal amount at the rate Payee is charged from time to time by GMAC Commercial Credit LLC (the “Bank Rate”). All amounts payable hereunder shall be payable to Payee in United States dollars at such bank account as shall be designated
by the Payee in immediately available funds or as otherwise specified to Payor in writing. Payment on this note shall be applied first to any expenses of collection, then to accrued interest, and thereafter to the outstanding principal balance
hereof. The principal amount and accrued interest are due and payable on the earlier of (i) August 31, 2003 and (ii) to the extent of the proceeds of any “Warrant Share Sale” (as defined below), the third business day following the date
upon which Payor sells any or all of the Warrant Shares (a “Warrant Share Sale”).” 
  
 2.    The principal amount and accrued interest due under the Note shall in any event be due and payable on August 31, 2003, and such due date shall not be extended under any circumstances. 

 
 3.    Except as expressly amended hereby, all other terms and conditions of the Note shall remain in full
force and effect in accordance with the original terms thereof. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed
this Amendment No. 1 to the Note as of the day and year first above written. 
  
 
	 ACCLAIM ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
 
	 
	 By:
 	 	 /s/    JAMES R. SCOROPOSKI        
 

	  	 	 Title: Executive Vice President
 

 
  
 
	 
	 /s/    GREGORY FISCHBACH
 

	 Gregory Fischbach
### §2523a. Repealed. Pub. L. 112–239, div. C, title XXXI, §3133(c)(1), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 2192

Section, Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLII, §4203A, as added Pub. L. 111–383, div. C, title XXXI, §3112(a), Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4507, related to biennial plan on modernization and refurbishment of the nuclear security complex.
§ 70.203 Certified person; maintenance and calibration. ( a ) Approved sampling devices shall be maintained and calibrated by a certified person.
( b ) To be certified, a person shall complete the applicable MSHA course of instruction and pass the MSHA examination demonstrating competency in maintenance and calibration procedures for approved sampling devices. Necessary maintenance of the sampling head assembly of a CMDPSU, or the cyclone assembly of a CPDM, can be performed by persons certified in sampling or in maintenance and calibration.
( c ) To maintain certification, a person must pass the MSHA examination demonstrating competency in maintenance and calibration procedures every three years.
( d ) MSHA may revoke a person's certification for failing to properly carry out the required maintenance and calibration procedures.
#### § 56.19001 Rated capacities.

Hoists shall have rated capacities consistent with the loads handled and the recommended safety factors of the ropes used.