alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 28.23 Approval labels or markings; approval of contents; use. ( a ) Approval labels shall bear the emblem of the Mine Safety and Health Administration, an approval number, the restrictions, if any, placed upon the use of the fuse by MSHA, and where appropriate, the applicant's name and address.
( b ) Upon receipt of a certificate of approval, the applicant shall submit to MSHA, for approval of contents, full-scale reproductions of approval labels or markings, as appropriate, and a sketch or description of the method of application and position on the fuse, together with instructions for the installation, use, and maintenance of the fuse.
( c ) Legible reproductions or abbreviated forms of the label or markings approved by MSHA shall be attached to or printed on each fuse.
( d ) Each fuse shall be marked with the rating of the Underwriters Laboratories, Inc.
( e ) MSHA shall, where necessary, notify the applicant when additional labels, markings, or instructions will be required.
( f ) Approval labels or markings shall only be used by the applicant to whom they were issued.
( g ) The use of any MSHA approval label or marking obligates the applicant to whom it is issued to maintain or cause to be maintained the approved quality control sampling procedure and the acceptable quality level for each characteristic tested, and to guarantee that the approved fuse is manufactured according to the specifications upon which the certificate of approval is based.
( h ) The use of any MSHA approval label or marking obligates the applicant to whom it is issued to retest the approved fuse within a 2-year period from the date of the certificate of approval, and every 2 years thereafter, in accordance with the provisions of § 28.10.
[37 FR 7562, Apr. 15, 1972, as amended at 43 FR 12316, Mar. 24, 1978; 45 FR 68935, Oct. 17, 1980]
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.1731 Maintenance of belt conveyors and belt conveyor entries. ( a ) Damaged rollers, or other damaged belt conveyor components, which pose a fire hazard must be immediately repaired or replaced. All other damaged rollers, or other damaged belt conveyor components, must be repaired or replaced.
( b ) Conveyor belts must be properly aligned to prevent the moving belt from rubbing against the structure or components.
( c ) Materials shall not be allowed in the belt conveyor entry where the material may contribute to a frictional heating hazard.
( d ) Splicing of any approved conveyor belt must maintain flame-resistant properties of the belt.
[73 FR 80616, Dec. 31, 2008]
#### GROARKE, Appellant, v. LAEMMLE, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 6, 1903.)

Action by Francis J. Groarke, an infant, against George Laemmle. S. R. Taylor, for appellant. D. Berier, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, on the authority of Turell v. Railroad Co., 46 App. Div. 296, 61 N. Y. Supp. 308.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         123,731
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  344,563
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (8,535)
<INVENTORY>                                      8,543
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               525,802
<PP&E>                                       1,102,055
<DEPRECIATION>                               (742,319)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 920,718
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          396,118
<BONDS>                                         15,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        71,716
<OTHER-SE>                                     178,921
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   920,718
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,668,720
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,621,017
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   261
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,947
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 47,442
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,721
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,721
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,721
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.00
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.278



                                 PROMISSORY NOTE
                                  (NO INTEREST)

$9,184.00                                                   Glendale, California
   June 29, 2000




     FOR VALUE RECEIVED,  Ken Luong (Payor")  promises to pay in lawful money of
the  United  States of  America to  Pollution  Research  and  Control  Corp.,  a
California corporation ("Payee"), or order, at Glendale,  California, the sum of
$9,184.00  Dollars  from the date  hereof on the  unpaid  principal  payable  in
installments  of principal only in the sum of $50.00 Dollars  commencing on July
15,  2000 and  payable  on the same day of each month  thereafter  until paid in
full.

     The unpaid principal may be prepaid without penalty. Each payment hereunder
shall be credited to the principal amount.

     If each  installment  under this note is not paid when due, the undersigned
shall pay all costs of collection thereof, including reasonable attorneys' fees,
whether or not suit or action is commenced to enforce  payment of this note, and
Payee may, at its option, declare the entire amount of the then unpaid principal
immediately  due and payable if such  default is not cured  within 10 days after
Payee provides the undersigned  written notice of such default.  The undersigned
hereby waives presentment, notice of dishonor and protest.

     This note is secured by shares of Payee's  common stock,  no par value (the
"Shares"),  pursuant to a certain Stock Pledge  Agreement,  dated as of June 29,
2000 (the "Pledge Agreement").

     Upon the termination of employment of Payor as an employee of Payee for any
reason,  the unpaid  balance of this note shall be  cancelled,  and the pro rata
portion  of Shares  which then not fully paid for,  shall be  returned  to Payee
pursuant to the terms of the Pledge Agreement.

                                            Payor:



                                            By:  /s/  Ken Luong
                                               --------------------------------
                                                      Ken Luong
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Discovery Oil Ltd, a Delaware corporation, (the Company) hereby certifies to such officers knowledge that:  1. This quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date:  August 10, 2006 /s/ Andrew Ippolito ________________________________ Andrew Ippolito President, Director, and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report of Constar International Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Hoffman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ MICHAEL J. HOFFMAN                                  
|Michael J. Hoffman President and Chief Executive Officer

May 15, 2008
# gaMa Gas Appli

# ance 

# Man ufacturers Ass

# oci

# ation

2107 Wilson Boulevard , Suite 600 Arlington, VA 22201 Phone : (703) 525-7060 Fax: (703) 525-6790 www.gamanet.org 

### March 18, 2002 Mr. Cyrus Nasseri Program Manager Office of Building Research and Standards (MS EE-41) U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington D.C. 20585
Re: Docket No. EE-RM/STD-0 1-3 50 Efficiency Standards for Residential Furnaces and Boilers
Dear Mr. Nasseri: The Gas Appliance Manufacturers Association (GAMA), on behalf of our members, is pleased to provide you with furnace jacket loss data in support of your review of the NAECA efficiency standards for furnaces and boilers. The data comprise all the furnace jacket loss testing that Intertek Testing Services (ITS) performed as part of GAMA's performance certification program in 2001. This information is normally not available to the public, but we are pleased to make it available to you and the public as part of this proceeding. Please look to us to continue to provide you with useful information in the months ahead. Best Regards,

Mark Kendall Director, Technical. Services

Attachment

### Furnace Jacket Loss Test Results 22 Furnace Models from ITS Testing, 2001 Gas Appliance Manufacturers Association Submitted to the U.S. DOE on March 18, 2002

Rated Measured Input, Jacket kBtu / hr. Loss, % 40 0.38 40 0.99 50 0.57 60 0.32 60 0.3 75 0.36 80 0.58 80 0.37 100 0.34 100 0.31 100 0.21 100 0.45 100 0.35 115 9.45 115 0.14 120 0.22 120 0.21 120 0.28 125 0.19 125 0.17 125 0.36 150 0.34 1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4 0.2 0 Furnace Jacket Loss Test Results for 2001

75 80 85 90 95 100 Rated AFUE (%)

Furnace Jacket Loss Test Results for 2001

1.2
1 0.8 N N 

## 3 0.6

0.4
0.2 

### 0 0 y = -0.3003Ln(x) + 1.7092 R2=03947

20 40 60 80 100 Input ( kBTUh) 0

120 140 160 Rated Measured AFUE, % Jacket

Loss, % 80 0.17 80 0.21 80 0.32 80 0.34 80 0.34 80 0.35 80 0.36 80 0.37 80 0.45 80 0.45 80 0.57 80 0.58 80 0.99 81 0.14 81 0.36 92 0.21 93 0.22 93 0.28 93 0.3 93 0.31 94 0.19 96 0.38
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99-6


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, David E. Meador, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The
Detroit Edison Company (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
         period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



Dated:   November 13, 2002                       /s/ DAVID E. MEADOR
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                                    David E. Meador
                                               Senior Vice President and
                                              Chief Financial Officer of
                                               The Detroit Edison Company
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 08/14/2014

FROM: Laura Farris/EPA Region 8

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

SUBJECT: American Lung Association Luncheon held on 08/14/2014

SUMMARY: 

Carl Daly, EPA Region 8 Air Program Director, attended an American Lung Association Luncheon 

featuring Dr. Jonathan Buonocore from Harvard University School of Public Health, who spoke about 

their recent study on the co-benefits of reducing carbon pollution. Mr. Daly encouraged attendees to 

submit comments to the Clean Power Plan docket. This Plan was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES:

EPA REGION 8:

Carl Daly, Air Program Director

OTHER GUESTS:

 Jonathan Buonocore, the Harvard Researcher

 Cindy, Liverance, ALA-Colorado

 Christian Stumpf, ALA-Southwest region Director of Public Policy

 John Streit, RT, ALA-Colorado

 Sandy Stenmark, Kaiser

 Michelle Irwin, Channel 7

 Rohit Katial, MD, National Jewish Health

 Dale Varner, MD, Kaiser

 Beth Chacon, Xcel

 Rob Mansheim, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer

 Natalia Swalnick, BCS, Incorporated

 Justin Wilson, Western Conversation Foundation

 Frank Swain, Colorado Conservation

 Ivor Douglas, MD, American Thoracic Society

 Cindy Bosco, Denver Mayor’s Office

 Tyler Svitak, Clean Cities Coalition

 Tom Schuck, Southern Region Clean Cities Coalition

 Steve McCannon, Regional Air Quality Council

 Julie Moyle, Healthier Hospitals Initiative

DOCUMENTS EXCHANGED:

Copy of May 27, 2014, paper: Co-Benefits of Carbon Standards, which can be found here:

http://eng-cs.syr.edu/our-departments/civil-and-environmental-engineering/research/carbon-cobenefits-research/
<PAGE>


                                EXHIBIT 10.10.3
                                ---------------

                          ADDENDUM TO LEASE AGREEMENT
                          ---------------------------

                                February 1, 1999

Whereas:   Sedona - GeoServices, Inc. ("Tenant") entered into a Lease Agreement
           with Lewis Road Associates, a Pennsylvania Partnership, ("Landlord"),
           dated July 1st, 1996.

Whereas:   The existing Lease Agreement comprises 2,793 square feet on the
           Northwest corner of the second floor and 3,734 square feet on the
           Southwest corner of the second floor and 5,091 square feet on the
           Southeast corner of the second floor.

Whereas:   The Tenant is desirous of continuing the lease for the additional
           office space in the building on the Southeast corner of the second
           floor comprising of 583 square feet for an additional ninety (90)
           days.

Whereas:   The rent for the additional space shall be $15.00 per square foot and
           this agreement shall run for the period 2/l/99 - 4/30/99. After
           three(3) months, Tenant will have the option to take the entire space
           or continue the lease for an additional four(4) months. At that time
           the lease expiration will coincide with the original lease agreement
           expiration dates. When multiplied by the square feet of space will
           yield a monthly rental rate of $729.00.

Therefore: Intending to be legally bound, Tenant and Landlord agree to the above
           terms and conditions. All rights contained in the Original Lease
           Agreement will apply to this Addendum and its related space.
 
           -------------------------              -------------------------
           Gregory A. Dinnocenti-                 Larry Osterwise-President
           Lewis Road Associates                  Sedona GeoServices
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-3926

_____________________________

JOSEPH GEORGE MCKENZIE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jennie Kinsey, Judge.

October 11, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

B.L. THOMAS, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Laurel Cornell Niles, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant; Joseph McKenzie, pro 

se, Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2012 - 0448 Directorate ID : 2010 - SW - 016 - AD Helicopter Model: Agusta S.p.A. Model A109S Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 15 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to require modifying the electrical power distribution system to prevent failure of the circuit breaker, loss of electrical power to instruments powered by

the “BATT BUS” system, and subsequent loss of control of the hel icopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 471 Labor per Helicopter ( 8 work - hours x $ 8 5 /work hour) $ 680 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 1,151 Total US Fleet Cost $ 17,265 Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory

Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory

Flexibility

Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Mark F. Wiley
From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Heidi King <hking@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Deirdre Murphy/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Nealson Watkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lewis

Weinstock/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, David Orlin/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, John Hannon/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/24/2011 11:49 AM Subject: Redline of CO Preamble language

Heidi,

I discovered that Deirdre created a complete redline version on Friday afternoon, which is attached. It compares the new language we have added in response to interagency comments to the original version we sent to you. The key monitoring discus sion starts on page 131 and responds, we hope, to all of the DOT and other comments on monitoring. DOT may be particularly interested in the language that begins on page 133, which explains the rationale for the new CO near

- road network requirements. Ple ase let me know if you have any questions. If you can let me know tomorrow whether there are any further questions, that would be most helpful.

Lydia
§ 550.186 What reporting information and report forms must I submit? ( a ) You must submit information and reports as BOEM requires. ( 1 ) You may obtain copies of forms from, and submit completed forms to, the Regional Supervisor.
( 2 ) Instead of paper copies of forms available from the Regional Supervisor, you may use your own computer-generated forms that are equal in size to BOEM's forms. You must arrange the data on your form identical to the BOEM form. If you generate your own form and it omits terms and conditions contained on the official BOEM form, we will consider it to contain the omitted terms and conditions.
( 3 ) You may submit digital data when the Region is equipped to accept it.
( b ) When BOEM specifies, you must include, for public information, an additional copy of such reports. ( 1 ) You must mark it *Public Information.*
( 2 ) You must include all required information, except information exempt from public disclosure under § 550.197 or otherwise exempt from public disclosure under law or regulation.
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.900-2 Approved circuit schemes. The following circuit schemes will be regarded as providing the necessary protection to the circuit required by § 75.900: ( a ) Ground check relays may be used for undervoltage protection if the relay coils are designed to trip the circuit breaker when line voltage decreases to 40 to 60 percent of the nominal line voltage.
( b ) One undervoltage device installed in the main secondary circuit at the source transformer may be used to provide undervoltage protection for each circuit that receives power from that transformer.
( c ) One circuit breaker may be used to protect two or more branch circuits if the circuit breaker is adjusted to afford overcurrent protection for the smallest conductor.
( d ) Circuit breakers with shunt trip, series trip or undervoltage release devices may be used if the tripping elements of such devices are selected or adjusted in accordance with the settings listed in the tables of the National Electric Code, 1968.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         594,225
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,312,267
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,000
<INVENTORY>                                    940,035
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,625,635
<PP&E>                                       4,899,873
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,062,070
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,683,211
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,562,238
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,683,211
<SALES>                                      6,595,705
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,595,705
<CGS>                                        5,087,960
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  704,945
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             154,605
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                648,195
<INCOME-TAX>                                   259,278
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            388,917
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   388,917
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29


</TABLE>