alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Simon Property Group, L.P. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/ David SimonDavid Simon
Chief Executive Officer
of Simon Property Group, Inc.,
General Partner of Simon Property Group, L.P.
November 14, 2003 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

|/s/ Stephen E. SterrettStephen E. Sterrett
Chief Financial Officer
of Simon Property Group, Inc.
General Partner of Simon Property Group, L.P.
November 14, 2003 |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

31

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>


  <ARTICLE>                     5
  <CIK>                         0000029693
  <NAME>                        Donnkenny, Inc.


  <S>                             <C>
  <PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
  <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-2000
  <PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-2000
  <PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-2000
  <CASH>                                           44,736
  <SECURITIES>                                          0
  <RECEIVABLES>                                25,841,918
  <ALLOWANCES>                                  3,970,364
  <INVENTORY>                                  21,863,952
  <CURRENT-ASSETS>                             47,600,004
  <PP&E>                                       10,965,435
  <DEPRECIATION>                                5,447,856
  <TOTAL-ASSETS>                               84,459,372
  <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        12,983,538
  <BONDS>                                               0
  <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
  <PREFERRED>                                           0
  <COMMON>                                         36,174
  <OTHER-SE>                                   36,808,289
  <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 84,459,372
  <SALES>                                      27,732,698
  <TOTAL-REVENUES>                             27,732,698
  <CGS>                                        22,261,435
  <TOTAL-COSTS>                                22,261,435
  <OTHER-EXPENSES>                              6,571,380
  <LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
  <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            1,080,775
  <INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,180,891)
  <INCOME-TAX>                                     58,333
  <INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,239,224)
  <DISCONTINUED>                                        0
  <EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
  <CHANGES>                                             0
  <NET-INCOME>                                (2,239,224)
  <EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.62)
  <EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.62)


</TABLE>
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-24-00096-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF MICHELLE MAPUANA MANN AND

JASON R. MANN AND IN THE INTEREST OF M.K.M. AND M.M.M., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the

103rd District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2019-DCL-05931-D

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal will be taxed against the 

party incurring the same.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 29, 2024
### §80504. Approval and examination

(a) Domicile and Principal Office in United States.—A container owner domiciled and having its principal office in the United States shall have the container—

(1) approved initially under procedures prescribed by the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating or by the government of another country that is a party to the Convention; and

(2) examined periodically as provided in the Convention under procedures prescribed by the Secretary.

(b) Domicile or Principal Office in United States.—A container owner domiciled or having its principal office in the United States shall have the container—

(1) approved initially under procedures prescribed by the Secretary or by the government of another country that is a party to the Convention; and

(2) examined periodically as provided in the Convention, under procedures prescribed by the government of the country in which the owner is domiciled or has its principal office, as long as that country is a party to the Convention.

(c) Neither Domicile Nor Principal Office in United States.—A container owner neither domiciled nor having its principal office in the United States or another country that is a party to the Convention may submit a container for initial approval and periodic examination under procedures prescribed by the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §11, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1695.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 80504. | 46 App.:1502(a) (related to approval and examination). | Pub. L. 95–208, §3(a) (related to approval and examination), Dec. 13, 1977, 91 Stat. 1476. |

Section

In this section, the words "Beginning on the date the instrument of ratification is deposited by the United States in accordance with the provisions of article VII of the Convention, for new containers, and beginning on September 6, 1982, for existing containers" are omitted as obsolete.

In subsections (a)(1) and (b)(1), the words "government of another country that is a party to the Convention" are substituted for "administration of another contracting party to the Convention" for clarity.

In subsection (c), the word "initial" is added for consistency in the section.
## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

. August 7, 2008

ERRATUM

Appeal No. 2008-3025

Boque v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs

Decided: August 6, 2008 Nonprecedential Opinion

On Page 5, last line, replace “Baldwin” with “Boque.”
No. 8369.

#### Jones, Auditor, et al. *v.*Britton.

(Decided December 15, 1903.)

Error to Circuit Court of Franklin county

*Mr. Cyrus Huling*and *Messrs. Taylor, Seymour, Webber é King,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. C. T. Clark; Messrs. Rogers & Rogers; Mr. Chas. Kinney; Mr. F. Rathmell; Mr. E. E. Corwin; Mr. M. E. ThrailMll*and *Mr. H. J. Ossing,*for defendant in error.

Judgment of the circuit court reversed, injunction dissolved, and petition of plaintiff below dismissed.

Burket, C. J., Davis, Shauck, Price and Crew, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.1727 Drive belts. ( a ) Drive belts shall not be shifted while in motion unless the machines are provided with mechanical shifters.
( b ) Belt dressing shall not be applied while belts are in motion except where it can be applied without endangering a person.
[38 FR 4976, Feb. 23, 1973]
:}EmRTMENTOF 

BEFORE THE I-ET OPERATIONS 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

^ OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY ;jncf:o_ 2 O U 7Li 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

It 

INTRA-ALASKA MAINLINE 

SERVICE MAIL RATES 

Docket OST-2003-14695 

(Docket OST-95-429) 

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE COMMENTS ON 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ESTABLISHING NEW 

MAINLINE SERVICE MAIL RATES 

The Postal Service has reviewed Show Cause Order 10-2010-8-7, and has no 

response to the overall Order, but wishes to comment on a circumstance relating to 

the current fuel costs. As recited in the last quarterly fuel update, Order 2010-6-24, 

Lynden Air Cargo (Lynden) understated its fuel costs for 2009, discovered its error in a 

year-end internal audit, and included an adjustment for the understatement in its 2010 

reports. 

While the Postal Service understands that such adjustments level out over time, they 

impact our planning and budgeting in the short run. We are pleased to know that 

Lynden has put new accounting procedures in place so that similar errors should not 

arise in its future updates, allowing the Postal Service allocate its funds more 

accurately. 

These comments have been provided to the affected carriers.
§ 74.10 Operating and maintenance instructions. ( a ) *Contents.* The manufacturer must include operating and storage instructions and a maintenance and service life plan with each new CPDM device sold. These documents must be clearly written. ( 1 ) Operating and storage instructions must include: ( i ) An explanation of how the CPDM works;
( ii ) A schematic diagram of the CPDM;
( iii ) Procedures for wearing and use of the CPDM;
( iv ) A one page “quick start guide” that will enable a novice to start and operate the CPDM.
( v ) Procedures for calibration of the CPDM;
( vi ) Procedures for inspecting the operating condition of the CPDM;
( vii ) Procedures and conditions for storage, including the identification of any storage conditions that would likely impair the effective functioning of the CPDM; and
( viii ) Procedures and conditions of use, including identification of any conditions of use that would likely impair the effective functioning of the CPDM.
( 2 ) The maintenance and service life plan must address: ( i ) Conditions that should govern the removal from service of the CPDM; and
( ii ) Procedures that a user or others should follow when inspecting, performing maintenance and calibration, and determining when the CPDM should be removed from service.
( b ) *Submission to NIOSH for approval.* A copy of the instructions and plan under paragraph (a) of this section shall be submitted to NIOSH with the application for approval of the CPDM and if substantive changes are made to the approved device or approved instructions.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7741
TOMMY R. ROBINSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIAM STRONG, Maryland Penitentiary Kitchen Supervisor; SERGEANT MOORE, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-95- 2570-AMD) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 25, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tommy R. Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's denial of his motions for a temporary restraining order and for appointment of counsel. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §40101. Definition of institution of higher education

In this chapter, the term "institution of higher education" has the meaning given the term by section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001).

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3378.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 40101 | 42 U.S.C. 16701. | Pub. L. 109–155, title IV, §401, Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2923. |

Section
****Accountants' Letter****
### §11124. War emergencies; embargoes imposed by carriers

(a)(1) When the President, during time of war or threatened war, notifies the Board that it is essential to the defense and security of the United States to give preference or priority to the movement of certain traffic, the Board shall direct that preference or priority be given to that traffic.

(2) When the President, during time of war or threatened war, demands that preference and precedence be given to the transportation of troops and material of war over all other traffic, all rail carriers providing transportation subject to the jurisdiction of the Board under this part shall adopt every means within their control to facilitate and expedite the military traffic.

(b) An embargo imposed by any such rail carrier does not apply to shipments consigned to agents of the United States Government for its use. The rail carrier shall deliver those shipments as promptly as possible.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §102(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 11128 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

Prior sections 11124 to 11128 were omitted in the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

Section 11124, Pub. L. 95–473, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1422, related to rerouting traffic on failure of rail carrier to serve the public.

Section 11125, Pub. L. 95–473, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1423; Pub. L. 98–216, §2(15), Feb. 14, 1984, 98 Stat. 5; Pub. L. 103–272, §5(m)(28), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1378, related to directed rail transportation.

Section 11126, Pub. L. 95–473, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1424; Pub. L. 103–272, §5(m)(29), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1378, related to distribution of coal cars.

Section 11127, Pub. L. 95–473, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1424; Pub. L. 99–521, §9(b)(1), (2), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2997, related to service of household goods freight forwarders.

Section 11128, Pub. L. 95–473, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1425, related to war emergencies and embargoes imposed by carriers. See section 11124 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
### In The

C ou rt o f A p p ea ls

Si x t h Appe l l at e Di st r i c t o f Te x as a t Te x ar ka na

______________________________

No . 0 6- 09 -0 00 96 -C V

______________________________

I N R E: RI CH AR D M . K I NG , JR.

Orig inal Mandamus Proce eding

B e f o r e M o r r i s s

, C

. J.

, C a

r t e r a n d M o s e l e y

, JJ.

Me mor a nd

um O pin ion

by Chi e f Jus tic e Mo rr iss2 MEMORANDUM OPI

NI ON

Richard M. King , J r., wa s convicted of ag g rava ted sexual assault of a c hild. He complained

to the trial court that his attorne y failed to c onsult with an expert in the are a of c hild sex ual abuse

.

For rea sons n o t thoroug hly

explained in King' s petition for writ of manda mus with thi s Court, he

fi le d a c ivi l su it a g a ins t hi s a tto rn e y , c le rk of the c ou rt

, and se ve ra l de pu ty c le rk s. Ki ng a sk s th is

Court to issue manda

mus r elief ag ainst J udg e Eric Clifford due to his " conspirac y with one or more

of the de fenda

n t s i n t h i s m at ter, [and re fusal] to allow King to file his c ivil sui t." King ' s petition

c le a rl y sta te s th a t he did

no t pa y the fi lin g fe e fo r thi s civ il s uit . A lth ou g h h e su bmi tte d a n a ff ida vit

of indig ency , it is not included as pa rt of any rec ord for

our re view.

Mandamus is a

n extraordinary

reme dy that issues only

to corre ct a c lear

abuse of discretion

or violation of a duty imposed by law when no other adequate re medy

by law is ava ilable. State v.

W alker , 6 79 S.W. 2d 48 4, 48 5 (T e x. 19 84 ) ( or ig . p ro c e e din g ). Du e to t he na tur e of

thi s r e me dy , it

is King' s burden to prop er l y reque st and show entitlement to the mandamus re lief. Se e ge ne ra lly

J oh ns on v . F

ou rth Di st. Cou rt o

f App eals , 700 S.W .2d 916, 917 (Tex. 1985) (orig . proce eding );

B a r n e s v

. S

tat e

, 8 3 2 S

. W

. 2 d

4 2 4

, 4 2 6 (T ex

. Ap p

. — Ho u s t o n [ 1 s t Di s t

. ] 1 9 9 2

, o ri g. p ro ce ed i n g)

(" Even a pro se a pplicant for a

writ of mandamus must s how h imself entitled to the extraordinary

relief he see ks.")

.

King had the oblig ation to provide us with evidenc e in suppor t of his c laim tha t he is entitled

to mandamus relief

. No re cord ha s been f

iled with this C ourt. The a bsence of a ma

ndamus rec ord3

p re v en t s u s fr o m ev al u at i n g t h e c i rc u m s t an ce s o f t h i s ca s e a n d

, co n s eq u en t l y

, t h e m er i t s o f K i n g's

complaints. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 5 2. 7; Barnes , 832 S.W .2d at 426.

We deny the petition for wr it of mandamus.

J o s h R

. M o r

r i s s

, III

Chief J ustice

Date Submitted: November 10, 2009

Date D ecide d: November 12, 2009
131 STAT. 6 PUBLIC LAW 115–2—JAN. 20, 2017 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 84: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017): 

Jan. 12, considered and passed Senate. 

Jan. 13, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–2 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To provide for an exception to a limitation against appointment of persons as 

Secretary of Defense within seven years of relief from active duty as a regular 

commissioned officer of the Armed Forces. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXCEPTION TO LIMITATION AGAINST APPOINTMENT OF 

PERSONS AS SECRETARY OF DEFENSE WITHIN SEVEN 

YEARS OF RELIEF FROM ACTIVE DUTY AS REGULAR 

COMMISSIONED OFFICERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the second sentence of section 113(a) of title 10, United States Code, the first person 

appointed, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, 

as Secretary of Defense after the date of the enactment of this 

Act may be a person who is, on the date of appointment, within 

seven years after relief, but not within three years after relief, 

from active duty as a commissioned officer of a regular component 

of the Armed Forces. 

(b) LIMITED EXCEPTION.—This section applies only to the first 

person appointed as Secretary of Defense as described in subsection 

(a) after the date of the enactment of this Act, and to no other 

person. 

Approved January 20, 2017. 

Applicability. 

10 USC 113 note. 

Jan. 20, 2017 

[S. 84] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
EXHIBIT 23.8

The Board of Directors
Genesys S.A.

   We consent to the use of our report dated May 11, 1998, relating to the
balance sheets of Aloha Conferencing Services, Inc. as of March 31, 1998 and
1997, and the related statements of operations and retained earnings
(accumulated deficit) and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year
period ended March 31, 1998, which appears in the February 12, 2001 Form F-4
Registration Statement of Genesys S.A. (No. 333-55392) and is incorporated by
reference in and made a part of the March 23, 2001 Form F-4 Registration
Statment of Genesys S.A. filed pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1933 for the registration of its ordinary shares. We also
consent to the reference to our firm under the heading "Experts" in the
registration statement.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Honolulu, Hawaii
March 23, 2001
§ 74.5 Tests of coal mine dust personal sampler units. ( a ) The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Department of Health and Human Services, shall conduct tests to determine whether a CMDPSU that is submitted for approval under these regulations meets the requirements set forth in § 74.4.
( b ) The Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), Department of Labor, will conduct tests and evaluations to determine whether the pump unit of a CMDPSU that is submitted for approval under these regulations complies with the applicable permissibility provisions of 30 CFR 18.68.
### §403i. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 403i, comprising former section 9 of the Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949, act June 20, 1949, ch. 227, was editorially reclassified as section 3509 of this title.
#### § 882.508 [Reserved]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Initial Review Group; Kidney, Urologic and Hematologic Diseases D Subcommittee DDK-D.                    

*Date:*                         March 2-4, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         5:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jason D. Hoffert, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK National Institutes of Health, Room 7343, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 496-9010,                         *hoffertj@niddk.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 15, 2020.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2020-28004 Filed 12-18-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P