alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2



I, Barry D. Michaels, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cardima, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The
registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                       |  |     |  |                                                                
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date November 15, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/    Barry D. Michaels                                       
|                       |  |     |  | Barry D. Michaels Interim Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary
#### § 56.19030 Safety device attachments.

Safety device attachments to hoist ropes shall be selected, installed, and maintained according to manufacturers' specifications to minimize internal corrosion and weakening of the hoist rope.
#### § 56.16003 Storage of hazardous materials.

Materials that can create hazards if accidentally liberated from their containers shall be stored in a manner that minimizes the dangers.
#### § 585.607 How do I submit my SAP?

You must submit your SAP to BOEM pursuant to § 585.111.
Exhibit 31-28**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, David E. Meador, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 of TheDetroit Edison Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. (Intentionally omitted)  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   /s/ DAVID E. MEADOR Date: November 14, 2006 David E. Meador  Executive Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer of The Detroit Edison Company  
26
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: May 12, 2008
    
    /s/ ANTHONY F. EARLEY, JR.

Anthony F. Earley, Jr.Chairman and Chief Executive Officer ofThe Detroit Edison Company
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM DIONICS, INC.'S  QUARTERLY  REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                         472,800
<SECURITIES>                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                  274,200
<ALLOWANCES>                   0
<INVENTORY>                    420,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               1,196,700
<PP&E>                         1,692,300
<DEPRECIATION>                 1,641,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 1,265,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          790,200
<BONDS>                        674,700
<COMMON>                       38,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          0
<PREFERRED>                    0
<OTHER-SE>                     1,522,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   1,265,900
<SALES>                        1,388,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               1,388,400
<CGS>                          951,900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  1,224,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             51,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                127,100
<INCOME-TAX>                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            127,100
<DISCONTINUED>                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                0
<CHANGES>                      0
<NET-INCOME>                   127,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                  .035
<EPS-DILUTED>                  .034



</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.1101-15 Construction of dry powder chemical systems. ( a ) Each self-contained dry powder system shall be equipped with hose or pipe lines which are no longer than necessary.
( b ) Metal piping and/or hose between control valves and nozzles shall have a minimum bursting pressure of 500 p.s.i.g.
( c ) Hose shall be protected by wire braid or its equivalent.
( d ) Nozzles and reservoirs shall be sufficient in number to provide maximum protection to each belt, belt takeup, electrical controls, and gear reducing unit.
( e ) Each belt shall be protected on the top surface of both the top and bottom belts and the bottom surface of the top belt.
减少畜肉、禽肉、猪肉加工与包装设施员工

COVID-19风险的九项步骤

保障自身以及周围工作人员的安全。即使在未出现

COVID-19症状的情况下,请依然遵守以下步骤。

OSHA 4064-07 2020 — 9 Steps to Reducing Worker Exposure to COVID-19 in Meat, Poultry, and Pork Processing and Packaging Facilities (Chinese Simplified)

若生病,请留在

家中。

➊

穿戴防护设备以保障

基本安全,减少病毒

传播。

➐

 

工歇时间避免人群

聚集,室外同理。

➌ 在生产线上装配隔板

来达到物理距离。

➍

➎ 避免共用设备与工具。经

常清洁必须共用的工具

与设备。

如有任何安全与健康

担忧,及时报告管理

人员或OSHA。

➑

➏ 使用肥皂与清水

洗手。

➋ 与同事保持至少6英

尺的物理距离。

1-800-321-OSHA (6742)

TTY 1-877-889-5627

www.osha.gov

职业安全与健

康管理局

尽可能避免共乘车往

返工作。

➒ 及时跟进公共卫生建议。更多

信息,请访问www.osha.gov/

coronavirus或拨打1-800-

321-OSHA (6742)。
Greater Ogdensburg Chamber of Commerce 

330 Ford Street Ogdensburg, NY 13669 

315'393'3620 Fax: 315'393'1380 

www.oHdensburgnv.com chamber@gisco.net 

August 9, 2010 

Mr. Wade Davis 

Ogdensburg Bridge & Port Authority 

1 Bridge Plaza, Suite 102 

Ogdensburg, NY 13669 

RE: Ogdensburg International Airport 

— DOT=OST'r99r-^2842 

AUG 1 0 20:^^ 

rr 

'0 

^99 

CO 

Dear Mr. Davis, 

Over the past two years the staff and Board of the Greater Ogdensburg Chamber 

of Commerce have become users of the Ogdensburg International Airport and Cape Air. 

Cape Air's reliable, affordable and frequent flights have provided us with an efficient 

means to travel to Albany and beyond. Cape Air's excellent distribution channels have 

helped make Ogdensburg very accessible to travelers in all parts of the country. 

Cape Air has committed to the community of Ogdensburg and has worked 

collaboratively to support local organizations. They have been a partner within the 

community. 

We support the Ogdensburg International Airport and Cape Air. We believe 

that selecting Cape Air to continue its scheduled air service between Ogdensburg and 

Albany would be in our best interest. 

Sincerely, 

Sandra Porter, 

Executive Director
#### The People of the State of New York v. Fred Schmidt.

Motion by defendant-appellant for a copy of trial minutes denied in all respects. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
| **Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Supplemental Disclosures (Net cash paid or received) (Details) (USD $)In Thousands, unless otherwise specified** | 3 Months Ended                 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|
||
| **Supplemental Cash Flow Elements [Abstract]**                                                                                                           |                           |   |
| Interest paid including capitalized interest                                                                                                             | $ 3,382us-gaap_InterestPaidNet | $ 4,412us-gaap_InterestPaidNet |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
The amount of cash paid for interest during the period net of cash paid for interest that is capitalized.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 230 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367179&loc=d3e4297-108586
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_InterestPaidNet**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**credit**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_SupplementalCashFlowElementsAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
§ 57.19130 Conveyance shaft test. Before hoisting persons and to assure that the hoisting compartments are clear of obstructions, empty hoist conveyances shall be operated at least one round trip after— ( a ) Any hoist or shaft repairs or related equipment repairs that might restrict or obstruct conveyance clearance;
( b ) Any oversize or overweight material or equipment trips that might restrict or obstruct conveyance clearance;
( c ) Blasting in or near the shaft that might restrict or obstruct conveyance clearance; or
( d ) Remaining idle for one shift or longer.
§ 57.13010 Reciprocating-type air compressors. ( a ) Reciprocating-type air compressors rated over 10 horsepower shall be equipped with automatic temperature-actuated shutoff mechanisms which shall be set or adjusted to the compressor when the normal operating temperature is exceeded by more than 25 percent.
( b ) However, this standard does not apply to reciprocating-type air compressors rated over 10 horsepower if equipped with fusible plugs that were installed in the compressor discharge lines before November 15, 1979, and designed to melt at temperatures at least 50 degrees below the flash point of the compressors' lubricating oil.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Baker, Elder and Fitzpatrick

JEROME SHAW

v. Record No. 2176-96-1 MEMORANDUM OPINION * PER CURIAM TARMAC LONE STAR FEBRUARY 11, 1997 AND LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Jerome Shaw, pro se , on brief). (Glenn S. Phelps; Thompson, Smithers, Newman & Wade, on brief), for appellees.

Jerome Shaw (claimant) contends that the Workers' Compensation Commission (commission) erred in denying his request for a change in treating physicians. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's

decision. Rule 5A:27. On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party below. R.G. Moore Bldg. Corp. v.

Mullins , 10 Va. App. 211, 212, 390 S.E.2d 788, 788 (1990). Whether a treating physician has released or abandoned his patient generally is determined by the express intent of the physician. In some cases, the total circumstances must be analyzed in order to determine whether discharge, release, or

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.2 abandonment of the patient was intended. This determination is a factual one which must be proved by clear and convincing

evidence. Jensen Press v. Ale , 1 Va. App. 153, 157, 336 S.E.2d 522, 524 (1985). In denying claimant's request for a change in treating physicians, the commission found as follows: [C]laimant will not be heard to complain that treatment from Dr. [A.W.K.] Durrani has been unproductive and that his condition has even deteriorated under that physician's care, and from specialists to whom he was referred for treatment, when it is clear from the record that the claimant has failed to comply with recommendations from the physicians that were to help resolve and ameliorate his injury. We also do not accept as credible his bare statement that Dr. Durrani has declined to provide treatment because the physician was not paid for his services. The file does contain a request from Dr. Durrani to the Commission in 1989 seeking to recover for nonpayment of services, but nothing afterwards. There is also nothing in Dr. Durrani's later medical records or reports to suggest that care would not be provided, if the claimant requests and is prepared to accept it.

The commission also found that the fifteen mile distance from claimant's home in Spring Grove, Virginia to Dr. Durrani's office in Hopewell, Virginia was not an unreasonable distance for claimant to travel for regular medical treatment from the authorized physician. The commission's findings are amply supported by the medical records and will not be disturbed on appeal. Because claimant failed to present any clear and convincing evidence of3 abandonment or inadequate treatment by Dr. Durrani, we cannot find as a matter of law that the commission erred in denying claimant's request for a change in treating physicians. For these reasons, we affirm the commission's decision.

Affirmed.
null

392.0574
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > The Federal Reserve Accountability Act of 1993

              																	United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs, 1977-1995					 and 	One Hundred Third Congress, 1993-1995. 						*The Federal Reserve Accountability Act of 1993 : Hearing Before the Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs, House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, First Session, October 13, 1993*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										October 13, 1993,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1154,			accessed on August 26, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### WALES, Appellant, v. MITCHELL, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

March 29, 1905.)

Action by Alexander D. Wales against John Mitchell, as president of the United Mine Workers of America.

PER CURIAM.

Order modified, by striking out the words “the date when, place where, and who present when plaintiff employed,” and inserting in place thereof the words “the date when and place where the plaintiff was employed,” and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs.
#### § 580.26 When may I resume activities?

The Regional Director will advise you when you may start your permit activities again.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KALVIN M. MCCULLOUGH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 24 MM 2021

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6th day of May , 2021, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Kathryn Denise McDuff, * From the County Court at Law No. 2

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 2-917-23.

Vs. No. 11-24-00219-CR * September 26, 2024

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal 

should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
§ 7.405 Critical characteristics. ( a ) A sample from each production run, batch, or lot of manufactured electric cable, signaling cable, or splice made from a splice kit shall be flame tested, or
( b ) A sample of the materials that contribute to the flame-resistant characteristic of the cable or splice and a sample of the cable or splice kit assembly shall be visually inspected or tested through other means for each production run, batch, or lot to ensure that the finished product meets the flame-resistance test.
#### Gladys Katz, Appellant, v Harry R. Cant et al., Defendants, and Frank A. Gunther et al., Respondents.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered November 29, 1977, unanimously reversed, on the law, and defendants-respondents’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint denied, with $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal to appellant; appeal from order of the same court, entered October 28, 1977, which granted the motion upon which that judgment was entered, unanimously dismissed, as *936subsumed in the judgment, without costs and without disbursements. Taking the allegations of the complaint at face value, as is to be done at this juncture, it does state a cause for the derivative relief which is sought in this shareholders’ suit. It may well be that the complaint will not survive a motion for summary judgment, but that is not our concern at this moment. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Birns, Fein, Markewich and Sullivan, JJ.