alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 241 (Tuesday, December 15, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 81206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27566]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY BOARD


Notice of Request for Comment on the Annual Report for Fiscal 
Year 2020 and Three-Year Plan

AGENCY: Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Monica R. Valentine, Executive 
Director, 441 G Street NW, Suite 1155, Washington, DC 20548, or call 
(202) 512-7350.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3511(d), the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), and the FASAB Rules 
Of Procedure, as amended in October 2010, notice is hereby given that 
the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) has issued its 
Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2020 and Three-Year Plan.
    The Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2020 and Three-Year Plan is 
available on the FASAB website at https://www.fasab.gov/our-annual-reports/. Copies can be obtained by contacting FASAB at (202) 512-7350.
    Respondents are encouraged to comment on the content of the annual 
report, FASAB's project priorities for the next three years, and the 
potential projects the Board will consider moving forward. Written 
comments are requested by January 21, 2021, and should be sent to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#99fff8eaf8fbd9fff8eaf8fbb7fef6ef"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6402051705062402051705064a030b12">[email protected]</span></a> or Ms. Monica R. Valentine, Executive Director, Federal 
Accounting Standards Advisory Board, 441 G Street NW, Suite 1155, 
Washington, DC 20548.

    Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.), 31 
U.S.C. 3511(d).

    Dated: December 8, 2020.
Monica R. Valentine,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2020-27566 Filed 12-14-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### §2822. Payment of costs of operation and maintenance of infrastructure at Nevada National Security Site

Notwithstanding any other provision of law and effective as of September 30, 1996, the costs associated with operating and maintaining the infrastructure at the Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, with respect to any activities initiated at the site after that date by the Department of Defense pursuant to a work-for-others agreement may be paid for from funds authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for activities at the Nevada National Security Site.

(Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLVIII, §4852, formerly Pub. L. 104–201, div. C, title XXXI, §3144, Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2838; renumbered Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLVIII, §4852, by Pub. L. 108–136, div. C, title XXXI, §3141(k)(16), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1786; Pub. L. 112–239, div. C, title XXXI, §3131(bb)(1)(B), (C), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 2185.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2013—Pub. L. 112–239 substituted "Nevada National Security Site" for "Nevada Test Site" in section catchline and in two places in text.
<PAGE>



                                                                EXHIBIT 23 (d)



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed
Registration Statements of National City Bancshares, Inc. (File No. 333-10739
and 333-56295) of our report dated October 24, 1997, on our audit of the
statements of financial condition of Princeton Federal Bank, fsb, as of
September 30, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated statements of income,
changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years ended September
30, 1997, 1996 and 1995, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.




/S/ THURMAN CAMPBELL & CO.
--------------------------
Princeton, Kentucky
March 24, 1999
No. 45,338

#### Charles H. Casebeer, *Plaintiff-Appellant,*v. Alliance Mutual Casualty Company, *Defendant-Appellee.*

(456 P. 2d 152)

Opinion filed July 17, 1969,

clarifying opinion filed May 17, 1969, and denying motion for rehearing.

(For original opinion reversing the appeal with directions see *Casebeer v. Alliance Mutual Casualty Co.,*203 Kan. 425, 454, P. 2d 511.)

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, J.:

The appellee asks for rehearing and clarification of the decision of the court previously rendered reversing this appeal. *(Casebeer v. Alliance Mutual Casualty Co.,*203 Kan. 425, 454 P. 2d 511.) We have examined the record, the former opinion, and the arguments and authorities cited in support of the motion for rehearing, and upon consideration by the court, it is denied.

The appellee’s request for clarification of our former opinion with respect to the manner of computing statutory interest on the judgment awarded the appellant, is granted.

In our former opinion reversing the appeal, the district court was directed:

*698“[T]o sustain the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and compute the amount due the plaintiff in accordance with 44-512a, together with the statutory interest, and to credit such total amount with the amount of the eight drafts mailed by Alliance to the plaintiff on November 16, 1967.” (1. c. 436.)

The plaintiff’s petition alleged his statutory demand was served upon Alliance May 13, 1967. Alliance had twenty days thereafter, or until June 2, 1967, in which to pay all compensation then due and unpaid. (K. S. A. 44-512a.) Alliance concedes the amount of compensation due the plaintiff on June 2, 1967, totaled in the sum of $8,398.79, and that it failed and refused to pay the same. That was the amount due the plaintiff when the district court considered his motion for summary judgment.

Statutory interest should be computed on the sum of $8,398.79 from June 2, 1967, to November 16, 1967, when Alliance paid the plaintiff $5,725.24, and interest should be computed on the remaining unpaid balance of $2,673.55 from November 16, 1967, until paid. (K. S. A. 44-512a, 16-201; *Fleming v. National Cash Register Co.,*188 Kan. 571, 363 P. 2d 432.)

Fromme, J., dissenting: The clarification requested was necessary and was properly granted, but the motion for rehearing should have been granted.

Schroeder, J., joins in the foregoing dissent.
#### § 7.31 New technology.

MSHA may approve brattice cloth and ventilation tubing that incorporates technology for which the requirements of this subpart are not applicable, if the Agency determines that the product is as safe as those which meet the requirements of this subpart.
#### § 582.13 [Reserved]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Harry Van Dyke, Appellant.

[831 NYS2d 902]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. Solomon, J., on suppression motions; Maxwell Wiley, J., at plea and sentence), rendered May 5, 2005, convicting defendant of four counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

Based upon our review of the minutes of the *Darden*hearing *(People v Darden,*34 NY2d 177 [1974]), we conclude that there was probable cause for issuance of the search warrant *(see generally Spinelli v United States,*393 US 410 [1969]; *Aguilar v Texas,*378 US 108 [1964]). We have examined defendant’s pro se arguments and find them without merit. Concur—Saxe, J.E, Williams, Buckley, Catterson and Malone, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from National
Property Investors 8 1999 Fourth Quarter 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                               0000763701
<NAME>                              NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 8
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      1743
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                107
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                    30,841
<DEPRECIATION>                           (17,517)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            15,440
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                   10,786
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                 3,798
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              15,440
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           4,751
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           4,595
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           917
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                 156
<EPS-BASIC>                                 3.43 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2> Multiplier is 1.
</FN>


</TABLE>
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -0 8- 00 03 3- CR Jose L uis AL ON ZO , Appellant
v . T h e STA TE of

Te xas, Appellee Fr om the 187th J udicial District Court, Be x ar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 1992-CR-2181 Honora ble Ray mond Ang elini, J udg e Presiding Opinion by : Alma L . L ópez, Chief J ustice Sitt ing: Alma L . L ópez, Chief J ustice

Catherine Stone, Justi ce Sandee B ry an Mar ion, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: September 10, 2008 AFF I RMED J ose L uis Alonz o pled g uilty

to capital murder pursuant to a plea barg ain ag ree ment and wa s
se nte nc e d to lif

e imp ri so nme nt. Al on zo a pp e a ls the tr ia l c ou rt ’s or de r d e nyinghis mot ion fo r p os tconviction DNA testing. Alonzo’s c ourt-appointed attorney filed a brief c ontaining a profe ssional evalua tion of the rec ord i n ac co rd ance with An de rs v . Ca lif or nia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel conclude s that t h e ap p ea l has no merit. Counsel provided A lonzo wit h a copy of the brie f and informed him of his rig ht to review the rec ord and f ile his own brief. Se e Nic ho ls v. S tat e , 95404
- 08
- 00 03 3- CR

- 2- S.W. 2d 83 , 8 5- 86 (T e x. Ap p. —Sa n An ton io 19 97 , n o p e t.) ; Br un s v . S tat e , 924 S.W .2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Alonzo did not file a pr o s e brief. After revie wing the re cord a

nd counsel’s br ief, we ag ree that the appe al is frivolous and without merit. The judg ment of the trial court is a ffirme d. Appellate c ounsel’s motion to withdraw is gr anted. Nic ho ls v . S

tat e , 95 4 S.W. 2d a t 86 ; Br un s 924 S.W .2d at 177 n.1. No subst itute counsel will be appointed
. S h o u l d Alonzo wish t o seek f urther r eview of

this case by

the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Alonzo must either retain a n attorney to file a pe tition for discretionar y revie w or Alonzo must fil e a pro se petition f or discretionar

y revie w. Any petition f

or discretionar

y revie w must be filed within thirty day s from the da te of e i t h er t h i s o p i n i on or the last timely motion for rehe aring that was ove rruled by this court. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 68.2. Any petition for discr etionary revie w must be filed with this court, after which it will be forwa

rded to the Te x as Court of Criminal Appea ls. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 68 .3 , 6 8. 7. An y pe tit ion fo r d isc re tio na

ry re vie w s ho uld

c omp ly wi th the re quirements of Rule 68.4 of the Te x as Rules of Appe llate Proce dure. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 68.4.

Alma L . L ópez, Chief J ustice DO NO T PU B L I SH
§ 725.23 Reports. ( a ) The agency shall, for each grant made under this part, submit semiannually to the Director or his authorized designee a Financial Status Report, SF 269, for non-construction grant activities in accordance with Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-102, Attachment H and OSM requirements. This report shall be accompanied by a Performance Report, Form OSM-51, comparing actual accomplishments to the goals established for the period, prepared according to Attachment I of OMB Circular No. A-102 and OSM requirements. The agency shall also submit semiannually a separate Outlay Report and Request for Reimbursement for Construction Programs, SF 271, and accompanying narrative performance report comparing actual accomplishments with planned goals on grant funded construction activities.
( b ) The Director or his authorized designee shall require through the grant agreement that semiannual reports also describe the relationship of financial information to performance and productivity data, including unit cost information. This quantitative information will be reported on Forms OSM-51A and OSM-51B or OSM-51C, Quantitative Program Management Information, as applicable.
( c ) The Director or his authorized designee shall require that when a grant is closed out in accordance with Attachment L to Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-102 the following actions are taken: ( 1 ) The grantee shall account for any property acquired with grant funds or received from the Government in accordance with the provisions of Attachment N to Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-102. This may be accomplished by the submission of the Report of Government Property, Form OSM-60.
( 2 ) The grantee shall submit a final financial report and thus release OSM from obligations under each grant or cooperative agreement that is being closed out.
[47 FR 38491, Aug. 31, 1982]
P.1 

OAR Box 1790 

Prepped by Keeia Richards 

Document Number: 

210) ll-E-6 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 10/31/2008 12:43:16 PM Sheet 210 of 250 
P.2 

A-90-3 7 

TT-E-tp 

October 11, 1995 

Note to Lydia Wegman 

From: Dennis Crumpler 

At about 12:00 noon today, I received a phone call from Art 

Fraas of Office of Management and Budget (OMB) regarding their 

position on Federal Enforceability as a prerequisite for limiting 

potential to emit in new source review. Art stated that OMB 

would like for EPA to accept the recent appeals court ruling and 

modifiy the definition of potential to emit to allow State 

enforceable limits as sufficient limitations in the NSR Reform 

rule. I said I would pass his message along to EPA Management. 

cc: Bob Kellam 

Karen Balnchard 

Greg Foote, OGC 

David Solomon 

Mark Kataoka, OGC 

Jerry MacLaughlin, OECA 

Tim Smith 

Dan deRoeck 

Mike Sewell 

Vickie Patton
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9656 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to ensure area career and technical 

education schools are eligible for mental health and substance use disorder service grants. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2024 

Mr. LANGWORTHY (for himself, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Ms. 

BONAMICI, Mrs. CHAVEZ-DEREMER, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. DAVIS of 

North Carolina, Mr. BOST, Mr. D’ESPOSITO, Mr. RULLI, Mr. MOYLAN, 

and Mr. BACON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to ensure area 

career and technical education schools are eligible for 

mental health and substance use disorder service grants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘CTE Student Mental 

5 Health and Wellness Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9656 IH

1 SEC. 2. MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER 

2 SERVICES FOR STUDENTS IN HIGHER EDU3 CATION. 

4 Section 520E–2 of the Public Health Service Act (42 

5 U.S.C. 290bb–36b) is amended— 

6 (1) in subsections (a) through (f)— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘an institution of higher 

8 education’’ each place it appears and inserting 

9 ‘‘a covered institution’’; 

10 (B) by striking ‘‘the institution of higher 

11 education’’ each place it appears and inserting 

12 ‘‘the covered institution’’; and 

13 (C) by striking ‘‘institutions of higher edu14 cation’’ each place it appears and inserting 

15 ‘‘covered institutions’’; 

16 (2) in subsection (c)— 

17 (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), 

18 by striking ‘‘Any institution of higher edu19 cation’’ and inserting ‘‘Any covered institution’’; 

20 and 

21 (B) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘institu22 tion of higher education supported’’ and insert23 ing ‘‘covered institution–supported’’; and 

24 (3) by amending subsection (g) to read as fol25 lows: 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 9656 IH

1 ‘‘(g) COVERED INSTITUTION DEFINED.—In this sec2 tion, the term ‘covered institution’ means— 

3 ‘‘(1) an area career and technical education 

4 school (as defined in section 3 of the Carl D. Per5 kins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006); 

6 and 

7 ‘‘(2) an institution of higher education (as de8 fined in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 

9 1965).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         263,575
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,916
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               369,504
<PP&E>                                       5,130,781
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,487,382
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,090,375
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          206,886
<BONDS>                                      3,046,243
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (162,754)<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,090,375
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,916,351
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,062,891
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             653,327
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,200,133
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,200,133
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (294,229)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,905,904
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   126.23<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>THIS ENTITY IS A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. THE OTHER STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY LINE
REPRESENTS TOTAL PARTNERSHIP EQUITY.
<F2>THE EPS-PRIMARY LINE REPRESENTS NET INCOME PER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
### CCA # 13-13-00369-CR JOSE ANGEL LERMA v. THE STATE OF 

### STYLE: TEXAS TRIAL COURT: 

### TRIAL COURT#: TRIAL COURTJUDGE: 

### DISPOSITION: Affirm 

### DATE: JUSTICE: PUBLISH: CLK RECORD: RPT RECORD: 

### STATE BR: APPBR: 219th District Court 219-81913-2012 Hon. Scott Becker

PC DNP: 

# 7Y5-/5"

OFFENSE: DWI 

### COUNTY: Collin 

## FORREHEARING IS: DATE: April 23, 2015 JUDGE: Justice Dori C. Garza



### SUPP CLKRECORD. SUPP RPT RECORD. SUPPBR

PROSE BR 

### MOTION



## IN THE COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS 

# APP£LL/\NT'>^ Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

### CCA# 

# 1+*-/? Disposition: DATE: 1 

# Ker</?&p JUDGE: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PC: PUBLISH: DNP: MOTION FOR REHEARING IN 

### MOTION FOR STAY OF MANDATE IS: CCA IS: JUDGE: ON ON JUDGE:
### APPENDIX D

- 1

2011 O n road Source Annual Inventory

Provided in Electronic Form Only

Bureau of Air Quality

Department of Environmental Protection[ This page intentionally left blank

. ]
§ 57.14109 Unguarded conveyors with adjacent travelways. Unguarded conveyors next to travelways shall be equipped with— ( a ) Emergency stop devices which are located so that a person falling on or against the conveyor can readily deactivate the conveyor drive motor; or
( b ) Railings which— ( 1 ) Are positioned to prevent persons from falling on or against the conveyor;
( 2 ) Will be able to withstand the vibration, shock, and wear to which they will be subjected during normal operation; and
( 3 ) Are constructed and maintained so that they will not create a hazard.
### §415a–6. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 415a–6, comprising section 506D of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as section 3100 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such condensed consolidated financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         786,602
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,965,703
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                         22,590,197
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                        9,173,412
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                         15,425,423
<PP&E>                                         276,672
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              54,398,630
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,329,311
<PAYABLES>                                   6,630,440
<REPOS-SOLD>                                29,761,255
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                          3,175,136
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                           8,539,624
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,294,740
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          425,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,330
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,376,885
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                54,398,630
<TRADING-REVENUE>                              365,759
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           795,744
<COMMISSIONS>                                  428,180
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                  713,400
<FEE-REVENUE>                                   26,165
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             531,483
<COMPENSATION>                               1,138,212
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                357,800
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     357,800
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   218,200
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.40
        


</TABLE>