alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 735.14 Coverage of grants. ( a ) *Program development grants.* An agency may use grant money under this part to cover the costs of developing— ( 1 ) New or revised State laws, regulations, and procedures;
( 2 ) Revised or expanded inspection systems;
( 3 ) Training programs for inspectors and other personnel;
( 4 ) New or revised organizational structures;
( 5 ) Information and communications systems, including data processing systems;
( 6 ) A planning process including a data base and information system to receive and act upon petitions to designate lands unsuitable for mining;
( 7 ) An application for the initial administration and enforcement grant to the extent not covered by indirect costs or other cost items;
( 8 ) Other components necessary to obtain an approved State program, as mutually agreed upon by the Director or his authorized designee and the agency receiving a grant.
( b ) *Administration and enforcement grants.* An agency may use grant money under this part to cover the costs of— ( 1 ) Administering an approved State regulatory program;
( 2 ) Providing supporting and administrative services required by the State regulatory program;
( 3 ) Providing equipment required for the regulatory program and its support, either through use charges or direct purchase. Equipment charges and purchases will be allowed in accordance with Federal Management Circular 74-4, “Cost principles applicable to grants and contracts with State and local governments,” (34 CFR part 255) and Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-102, “Uniform administrative requirements for grants-in-aid to State and local governments” (42 FR 45828).
#### § 77.500 Electric power circuits and electric equipment; deenergization.

Power circuits and electric equipment shall be deenergized before work is done on such circuits and equipment, except when necessary for troubleshooting or testing.
(May 18, 1960)

#### Rita K. Reoux, Appellant, v. Glens Falls Post Company et al., Respondents.

Motion to strike out portions of the record on appeal denied, without prejudice to its renewal upon the argument. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
§ 585.501 What deposits must I submit for a competitively issued lease, ROW grant, or RUE grant? ( a ) For a competitively issued lease or grant, BOEM may require a bid deposit before the auction as established in the FSN.
( b ) The provisional winner of a lease must pay the balance of its accepted bid in accordance with § 585.225.
#### § 56.19013 Diesel- and other fuel-injection-powered hoists.

Where any diesel or similar fuel-injection engine is used to power a hoist, the engine shall be equipped with a damper or other cutoff in its air intake system. The control handle shall be clearly labeled to indicate that its intended function is for emergency stopping only.
Exhibit 12-40
 THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 Three MonthsEnded March 31
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Twelve Months Ended December 312011
    
    
    2010
    
    
    2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006(Millions of Dollars)Earnings:Pretax earnings
    
    $
    137
    
    
    $
    707
    
    
    $
    604
    
    
    $
    517
    
    
    $
    466
    
    
    $
    482Fixed charges
    
    
    76
    
    
    
    328
    
    
    
    348
    
    
    
    324
    
    
    
    319
    
    
    
    299Net earnings
    
    $
    213
    
    
    $
    1,035
    
    
    $
    952
    
    
    $
    841
    
    
    $
    785
    
    
    $
    781Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    71
    
    
    $
    310
    
    
    $
    325
    
    
    $
    293
    
    
    $
    294
    
    
    $
    278Adjustments
    
    
    5
    
    
    
    18
    
    
    
    23
    
    
    
    31
    
    
    
    25
    
    
    
    21Fixed charges
    
    $
    76
    
    
    $
    328
    
    
    $
    348
    
    
    $
    324
    
    
    $
    319
    
    
    $
    299Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    2.80
    
    
    
    3.16
    
    
    
    2.74
    
    
    
    2.60
    
    
    
    2.46
    
    
    
    2.61
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9743 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9743

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction for 
 traveling expenses for Federal disaster relief workers away from home 
                         for more than 1 year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 20, 2024

Mr. Thompson of Mississippi (for himself and Ms. Sewell) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction for 
 traveling expenses for Federal disaster relief workers away from home 
                         for more than 1 year.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Deployed Emergency Professionals 
Lasting Over a Year Tax Relief Act'' or the ``DEPLOY Tax Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR TRAVELING EXPENSES FOR FEDERAL DISASTER RELIEF 
              WORKERS AWAY FROM HOME FOR MORE THAN 1 YEAR.

    (a) In General.--Section 162(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by inserting ``or is certified by the Administrator of 
the Federal Emergency Management Agency as traveling on behalf of the 
United States in temporary duty status to respond to a federally 
declared disaster (as defined in section 165(i)(5)(A))'' after ``a 
Federal crime''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN DE LOERA JIMENEZ,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney

General,

Respondent. No. 16

- 73485

Agency No. A044

- 125

- 516

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 11, 2018 **

Before: SILVERMAN, PAEZ, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Juan de Loera Jimenez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeal’s (“BIA”) order dismissing an appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for deferral of removal under

the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

APR 13 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 73485

U.S.C. § 1252. We r eview for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings,

Silaya v. Mukasey , 524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008), and we dismiss in part and

deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Jimenez’s contention that the agency e rred

in determining that his criminal conviction constituted a particularly serious crime

because he failed to raise the issue before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft , 358

F.3d 674, 677

- 78 (9th Cir. 2004) (court lacks jurisdiction to review claims not

pres ented to the agency).

Substantial ev idence supports the agency’ s denial of deferral of removal

under CA T because Jimenez failed to show it is more likely than not that he would

be tortured by or with the consent or acquiesc ence of the government if returned to

Mexico

. See Zheng v. Holder , 644 F.3d 829, 835

- 36 (9th Cir. 2011) ( possib ility of

torture too speculative).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
### §§636 to 639. Repealed. Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §53, 70A Stat. 641

Section 636, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 126, prohibited cruel and unusual punishments. See section 855 of Title 10, Armed Forces.

Section 637, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 126, related to maximum limits of punishment. See section 856 of Title 10.

Section 638, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 126, provided for effective date of sentences. See section 857 of Title 10.

Section 639, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 126, related to execution of confinement. See section 854 of Title 10.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Jan. 1, 1957, see act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §53 footnote, 70A Stat. 680.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          92,223
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  557,909
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,020,308
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,214,164
<PP&E>                                       4,790,035
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,789,377
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,932,691
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,438,630
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,934
<OTHER-SE>                                     979,427
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,932,691
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,737,456
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,364,044
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               612,150
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             158,226
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (396,964)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   158,786
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (238,178)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (238,178)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.18)
        

</TABLE>
§ 57.22208 Auxiliary fans (I-A, II-A, III, and V-A mines). ( a ) Auxiliary fans, except fans used in shops and other areas which have been so designed that methane cannot enter the airway, shall be approved by MSHA under the applicable requirements of 30 CFR part 18, and be operated so that recirculation is minimized. Auxiliary fans shall not be used to ventilate work places during the interruption of normal mine ventilation.
( b ) Tests for methane shall be made at auxiliary fans before they are started.
# C_2023303EN.01000101.xml

| 28.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11205 – INPEX CORPORATION / ENEL GREEN POWER / ENEL GREEN POWER AUSTRALIA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 303/01)

On 16 August 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11205. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11205. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 3a(iii)

                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                      OF
                     RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                      OF
                        BELL ATLANTIC - DELAWARE, INC.



     Bell Atlantic - Delaware, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation") does
hereby certify that the amendment to the Corporation's Restated Certificate of
Incorporation set forth in the following resolution, approved by the
Corporation's Board of Directors and Sole Stockholder, was duly adopted in
accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware:

        RESOLVED, that the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation be amended by changing Article First thereof so that, as amended,
the Article shall be and read as follows:


        "FIRST:  The name of the Corporation is Verizon Delaware Inc."


     This Certificate of Amendment of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation
shall be effective on August 1, 2000.


                        BELL ATLANTIC  - DELAWARE, INC.



                        By: /s/ David A. Hill
                           --------------------------------------
                                David A. Hill
                                Vice President and General Counsel



Dated:  June 30, 2000
§ 581.32 Waiver, suspension, or reduction of rental, minimum royalty, or production royalty. ( a ) The Secretary may waive, suspend, or reduce the rental, minimum royalty, and/or production royalty prescribed in a lease for a specified time period when the Secretary determines that it is in the National interest, it will result in the conservation of natural resources of the OCS, it will promote development, or the mine cannot be successfully operated under existing conditions.
( b ) An application for waiver, suspension, or reduction of rental, minimum royalty, or production royalty under paragraph (a) of this section shall be filed in duplicate with the Director. The application shall contain the serial number(s) of the lease(s), the name of the lessee(s) of record, and the operator(s) if applicable. The application shall either: ( 1 ) ( i ) Show the location and extent of all mining operations and a tabulated statement of the minerals mined and subject to royalty for each of the last 12 months immediately prior to filing the application:
( ii ) Contain a detailed statement of expenses and costs of operating the lease, the income from the sale of any lease products, and the amount of all overriding royalties and payments out of production paid to others than the United States; and
( iii ) All facts showing whether or not the mine(s) can be successfully operated under the royalty fixed in the lease; or
( 2 ) If no production has occurred from the lease, show that the lease cannot be successfully operated under the rental, royalty, and other conditions specified in the lease.
( c ) The applicant for a waiver, suspension, or reduction under this section shall file documentation that the lessee and the royalty holders agree to a reduction of all other royalties from the lease so that the aggregate of all other royalties does not exceed one-half the amount of the reduced royalties that would be paid to the United States.
§ 56.6404 Separation of blasting circuits from power source. ( a ) Switches used to connect the power source to a blasting circuit shall be locked in the open position except when closed to fire the blast.
( b ) Lead wires shall not be connected to the blasting switch until the shot is ready to be fired.
#### § 57.14217 Securing parked railcars.

Parked railcars shall be blocked securely unless held effectively by brakes.
#### § 77.515 Bare signal or control wires; voltage.

The voltage on bare signal or control wires accessible to personal contact shall not exceed 40 volts.
###### Editorial Note on [Part 75](/current/title-30/part-75?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.601-3 Short circuit protection; dual element fuses; current ratings; maximum values.

Dual element fuses having adequate current-interrupting capacity shall meet the requirements for short circuit protection of trailing cables as provided in [§ 75.601](/on/2024-09-16/title-30/section-75.601), however, the current ratings of such devices shall not exceed the maximum values specified in this section:

| Conductor size (AWG or MGM) | Single conductor cable | | Two conductor cable | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Ampacity | Max. fuse rating | Ampacity | Max. fuse rating |
| 14 | | | 15 | 15 |
| 12 | | | 20 | 20 |
| 10 | | | 25 | 25 |
| 8 | 60 | 60 | 50 | 50 |
| 6 | 85 | 90 | 65 | 70 |
| 4 | 110 | 110 | 90 | 90 |
| 3 | 130 | 150 | 105 | 110 |
| 2 | 150 | 150 | 120 | 125 |
| 1 | 170 | 175 | 140 | 150 |
| 1/0 | 200 | 200 | 170 | 175 |
| 2/0 | 235 | 250 | 195 | 200 |
| 3/0 | 275 | 300 | 225 | 225 |
| 4/0 | 315 | 350 | 260 | 300 |
| 250 | 350 | 350 | 285 | 300 |
| 300 | 395 | 400 | 310 | 350 |
| 350 | 445 | 450 | 335 | 350 |
| 400 | 480 | 500 | 360 | 400 |
| 450 | 515 | 600 | 385 | 400 |
| 500 | 545 | 600 | 415 | 450 |
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23


                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-59244) pertaining to the Security National Bank and Trust Company 401
(k) Profit Sharing Savings Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
33-80761) pertaining to the Security Banc Corporation 1995 Stock Option Plan of
our report dated January 12, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Security Banc Corporation incorporated by reference in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.


                                                        Ernst & Young LLP


Columbus, Ohio
March 25, 1998
#### § 77.1712 Reopening mines; notification; inspection prior to mining.

Prior to reopening any surface coal mine after it has been abandoned or declared inactive by the operator, the operator shall notify the Coal Mine Health and Safety District Manager for the district in which the mine is located, and an inspection of the entire mine shall be completed by an authorized representative of the Secretary before any mining operations in such mine are instituted.
# C_2023236EN.01001301.xml

| 4.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/13

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.11082 – ARP / GRI / JV)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 236/05)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Agencja Rozwoju Przemysłu S.A. (‘ARP’) (Poland), ultimately controlled by the Polish State, |
| --- | --- |

—

Agencja Rozwoju Przemysłu S.A. (‘ARP’) (Poland), ultimately controlled by the Polish State,

| — | GRI Renewable Industries, S.L. (‘GRI’) (Spain), ultimately jointly controlled by the Acek Group and the Mitsui Group. |
| --- | --- |

—

GRI Renewable Industries, S.L. (‘GRI’) (Spain), ultimately jointly controlled by the Acek Group and the Mitsui Group.

ARP and GRI will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the JV.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.

2.

| — | ARP’s global activities range from portfolio company and property management to cultural heritage preservation. ARP, through a subsidiary, is also active in the production and distribution of onshore wind towers, |
| --- | --- |

—

ARP’s global activities range from portfolio company and property management to cultural heritage preservation. ARP, through a subsidiary, is also active in the production and distribution of onshore wind towers,

| — | GRI is dedicated to the manufacture and supply of metal components for wind turbines, i.e. GRI manufactures wind towers (onshore and offshore), flanges and castings. GRI is active globally. |
| --- | --- |

—

GRI is dedicated to the manufacture and supply of metal components for wind turbines, i.e. GRI manufactures wind towers (onshore and offshore), flanges and castings. GRI is active globally.

3.

The business activities of the JV will be the following: the development, construction and operation of an offshore wind towers manufacturing plant located in Gdańsk, Poland.

4.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

5.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.11082 – ARP / GRI / JV

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
EXHIBIT 23(i)


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Forms S-3 No. 333-15371 as supplemented on July 13, 1998 and February
8, 1999) of Techdyne, Inc. and in the related Prospectus of our report dated
March 22, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Techdyne, Inc. as of and for the two years ended December 31, 1998
included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.

                                                         /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



March 25, 2000
Miami, Florida