alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.4





Certifications





I, William F. Gifford, Jr., certify that:





|   |                                                                                              
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Altria Group, Inc.;




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.







Date:  May 31, 2018


/s/ WILLIAM F. GIFFORD, JR.William F. Gifford, Jr.Vice Chairman andChief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 957 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 957

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the amount 
excluded from gross income by reason of distributions from governmental 
  retirement plans for health and long-term care insurance for public 
                            safety officers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 2023

   Ms. Spanberger (for herself, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. Kildee, and Mr. 
    Bacon) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the amount 
excluded from gross income by reason of distributions from governmental 
  retirement plans for health and long-term care insurance for public 
                            safety officers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Public Safety Retirees Healthcare 
Protection Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN AMOUNT EXCLUDED FROM GROSS INCOME BY REASON OF 
              DISTRIBUTIONS FROM GOVERNMENTAL RETIREMENT PLANS FOR 
              HEALTH AND LONG-TERM CARE INSURANCE FOR PUBLIC SAFETY 
              OFFICERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 402(l)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking ``$3,000'' and inserting ``$6,000''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by paragraph (1) shall 
apply to distributions in taxable years beginning after December 31, 
2023.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statements of Operations and the Consolidated Balance Sheets and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995             SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                             434                     434
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,320                   7,320
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,966                   1,966
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,754                  14,754
<PP&E>                                          19,517                  19,517
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,591                  14,591
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  72,166                  72,166
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,087                  27,087
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<COMMON>                                         5,619                   5,619
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,983                   3,983
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,984                  10,984
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    72,166                  72,166
<SALES>                                         11,132                  46,373
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,132                  46,373
<CGS>                                           12,225                  48,040
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,003                  57,165
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                 (6,360)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  87                     546
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,958)                 (4,978)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,812)                   (707)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,146)                 (4,271)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,146)                 (4,271)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.33)                  (0.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.33)                  (0.97)
        


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50136 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JESUS MANUEL MORENO-ESPARZA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-03-CR-1826-1-PRM

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jesus Manuel Moreno-Esparza appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Moreno-Esparza contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Moreno-Esparza maintains that he United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D June 23, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 04-50136 -2- pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Moreno-Esparza acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2887 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2887

      To suspend temporarily the duty on Alpha Oxy Naphthoic Acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2005

  Mr. Chabot introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on Alpha Oxy Naphthoic Acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALPHA OXY NAPHTHOIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.11.11      2                   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Naphthylenecarbox                                                  31/2008
                         ylic Acid, 1
                         Hydroxy (CAS No.
                         86-48-6)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2918.29.04)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.1





May 25, 2018








GCI Liberty, Inc. to Hold Annual Meeting of Stockholders





ENGLEWOOD, Colo.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- GCI Liberty, Inc. (“GCI Liberty”) (Nasdaq: GLIBA, GLIBP) will be holding its Annual Meeting of Stockholders on Monday, June 25, 2018, at 8:00 a.m. M.D.T., at the corporate offices of GCI Liberty, 12300 Liberty Blvd., Englewood, Colorado 80112.  The record date for the meeting is 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on May 14, 2018. The annual meeting will not be webcast.





About GCI Liberty, Inc.





GCI Liberty, Inc. (Nasdaq: GLIBA, GLIBP) operates and owns interests in a broad range of communications businesses. GCI Liberty’s principal assets consist of its subsidiary GCI and interests in Charter Communications and Liberty Broadband Corporation. GCI is Alaska’s largest communications provider, providing data, wireless, video, voice and managed services to consumer and business customers throughout Alaska and nationwide. GCI has delivered services for nearly 40 years to some of the most remote communities and in some of the most challenging conditions in North America. GCI Liberty’s other businesses and assets consist of its subsidiary Evite and its interest in Lending Tree.





GCI Liberty, Inc.


Courtnee Chun, 720-875-5420





Source: GCI Liberty, Inc.
# C_2023237EN.01000101.xml

| 5.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11105 – GOLDMAN SACHS / PLATINUM SPRING / DAIWA RESORT)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 237/01)

On 12 June 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11105. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11105. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
### §2653. Background investigations of certain personnel at Department of Energy facilities

The Secretary of Energy shall ensure that an investigation meeting the requirements of section 2165 of title 42 is made for each Department of Energy employee, or contractor employee, at a national security laboratory or nuclear weapons production facility who—

(1) carries out duties or responsibilities in or around a location where Restricted Data is present; or

(2) has or may have regular access to a location where Restricted Data is present.

(Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLV, §4503, formerly Pub. L. 106–65, div. C, title XXXI, §3143, Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 934; renumbered Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLV, §4503, and amended Pub. L. 108–136, div. C, title XXXI, §3141(h)(4), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1772; Pub. L. 112–239, div. C, title XXXI, §3131(l), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 2182.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 7383a of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 108–136.

#### Amendments

2013—Pub. L. 112–239 struck out subsec. (a) designation and heading "In general", substituted "national security laboratory" for "national laboratory" in introductory provisions of text, and struck out subsecs. (b) and (c), which, respectively, required compliance by Secretary with former subsec. (a) and defined "national laboratory" and "Restricted Data".

2003—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 108–136, §3141(h)(4)(D)(i), substituted "October 5, 1999," for "the date of the enactment of this Act" in the original, which for purposes of codification had been changed to "October 5, 1999," thus requiring no change in text.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 108–136, §3141(h)(4)(D)(ii), added subsec. (c).
§ 7.46 Impact test. ( a ) *Test procedures.* ( 1 ) Prepare four covers for testing by conditioning two covers at −13 °F (−25 °C) and two covers at 122 °F (50 °C) for a period of 48 hours.
( 2 ) Mount the covers on a battery box of the same design with which the covers are to be approved, including any support blocks, with the battery cells completely assembled. If used, support blocks must contact only the filler material or partitions between the individual cells. At the test temperature range of 65 °F-80 °F (18.3 °C-26.7 °C), apply a dynamic force of 200 ft. lbs. to the following areas using a hemispherical weight with a 6′′ maximum radius: ( i ) The center of the two largest unsupported areas;
( ii ) The areas above at least two support blocks, if used;
( iii ) The areas above at least two intercell connectors, one cell, and one filler cap; and
( iv ) Areas on at least two corners. If the design consists of both inside and outside corners, test one of each.
( 3 ) Record the condition of the covers, supports, intercell connectors, filler caps, cell covers, and filler material.
( b ) *Acceptable performance.* Impact tests of any of the four covers shall not result in any of the following: ( 1 ) Bent intercell connectors.
( 2 ) Cracked or broken filler caps, except plastic tabs which extend from the body of the filler caps.
( 3 ) Cracks in the cell cover, cells, or filler material.
( 4 ) Cracked or bent supports.
( 5 ) Cracked or splintered battery covers.
[53 FR 23500, June 22, 1988, as amended at 60 FR 33723, June 29, 1995]
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

I, David Fyfe, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Cambridge Display Technology, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

 

b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 2, 2005
2010and2011testreportsIConradChinto:LauraK.McAfee,RichardLunn08/15/201202:55PMChuckFrench,DarcieSmith,“BethFriedman”,JamesHagedorn,Cc:“Jarrett,JamesF”,“Robertson,James”,JonathanAverback,jskonrady,nelsonbrad,“Chakrabarty,RenuM”,“RichardLunn”,Bcc:ConradChinGoodafternoonRichItwasnicetalkingtoyouthisafternoon.IlearntduringourconversationthatthetestsatFelmanisscheduledtobecompletedthisFriday(8/17).Youalsotoldmethetypicalturnaroundtimeforyoutoreporttheresultsbacktousis21days.However,youwilltrytoshortentheturnaroundtimeto14days.ThatmeansweshouldexpecttohavetheresultsfromyouanywherebetweenSeptember4toSeptember10.SincewearecurrentlyplanningouractivitiesbasedontheDecemberpromulgationdate,itisunlikelythatwewillbeabletowaitforthetestresultsandincludetheminourdataanalysis.Ifweareabletoincludetheseresultsatalaterdate,wewilltryto,butthereisnopromise.Youcanhelpyourselfthoughbyprovidingusmoretestdataforthethreefurnacesfrompriortests(andthusincreasetheuniverseofdata).AsmentionedinmylastemailtoLaura,weobtainedfromWVDEPtestsummariesforFurnaces#5and7testedinNovember,2010.Wethinktheremighthavebeensomemix-upontheairflowcalculations.Ifweareabletocorrectthecalculations,wewillincludetheNovember2010tests.Wecontactedthetestcontractor,CustomStackAnalysis,today.Thecontact,JimGray,isonvacation.IfyoucanscantheNovember2010testreportandemailtomesometimetoday,thatwouldbegreat.Youmayneedtobreakthepagestodifferentsectionsandscanthesectionsassmallerfiles.Iunderstandthissamecontractoralsotestedthethreefurnacesin2011.Couldyouscanthe2011reportsometimetodayaswell?Wewillattempttoincludethe2010and2011testresultsinouranalysisiftheresultsarevalid.WealsodiscussedtosomeextentwhyFelmanbelievestheJuly2010ICRtestwasinvalid.YoumentionedthattheICRtestwasmanagedbyERSG,butsubcontractedouttoCustomStackAnalysis.YoualsopointedoutthattheMn%wasmeasuredincorrectlyat3%,whichweagree.(InfactIraisedthatissuetoPaulPigottinanemailtohimdated1217/2010).Ialsopointedouttoyouthatthemanganesemeasurement(Method29)isdifferentfromtheparticulateemissionmeasurement(Method5D).Wedidnotseeanyissuewiththeparticulatemeasurement.WeagreedthateitheryouorLaurawillprovideusasummaryoftheissuesfortheICRtestbycloseofbusinesstomorrow.IwillbeoutoftheofficethisFridayandwillreturnnextMonday.Duringmyabsence,Iwillnothaveemailaccess.ThereforeitispertinentthatyouwillneedtoprovidealltheinformationIrequestedbytomorrowsothatmycontractorcanfinishtheanalysisonFriday.Thanks.ConradK.ChinMailCodeD243-02MetalsandMineralsGroupSectorPoliciesandProgramsDivisionOfficeofAirQualityPlanningandStandardsU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency919-541-1512(voice)919-541-3207(fax)“LauraK.McAfee”I’msorry:youmeanbythedayaftertomorrow?...08/14/201202:00:30PMFrom:“LauraK.McAfee”<LMcAfee@bdlaw.com>To:ConradChin/RTP/USEPNUS@EPA