alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[House Hearing, 114 Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

 
                                [ERRATA]

  LEGISLATIVE HEARING ON: H.R. 1319; H.R. 1603; H.R. 1904; H.R. 2639; 
   H.R. 3234; H.R. 3471; H.R. 3549; DRAFT LEGISLATION, THE PROMOTING 
RESPONSIBLE OPIOID MANAGEMENT AND INCORPORATING MEDICAL EXPERTISE ACT; 
     AND, A VA LEGISLATIVE PROPOSAL, THE VA PURCHASED HEALTH CARE 
                   STREAMLINING AND MODERNIZATION ACT

=======================================================================

                                HEARING

                               before the

                         SUBCOMMITTEE ON HEALTH

                                 of the

                     COMMITTEE ON VETERANS' AFFAIRS
                     U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                    ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS

                             FIRST SESSION
                              __________

                       TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2015

                              __________

                           Serial No. 114-44

                              __________

       Printed for the use of the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
  

         Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gov
                                   ______

                         U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 

24-360                         WASHINGTON : 2017 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
  For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing 
  Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; 
         DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, 
                          Washington, DC 20402-0001

                               [ERRATA]

    An error was made within the table of contents.

                         PAGE (III) - CONTENTS

    WITNESSES

    Honorable Andy Barr, U.S. House of Reporesentatives, 6th 
Congressional District; Kentucky

    should be

    Honorable Andy Barr, U.S. House of Representatives, 6th 
Congressional District; Kentucky
```
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

16 CA 11-01549 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND GORSKI, JJ.

ANDREWS, PUSATERI, BRANDT, SHOEMAKER & ROBERSON, P.C. AND ROBERT S. ROBERSON, ESQ., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

COUNTY OF NIAGARA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

BRANDT, ROBERSON & BRANDT, P.C., LOCKPORT (ROBERT S. ROBERSON OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.

WEBSTER SZANYI LLP, BUFFALO (CHARLES E. GRANEY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Frank Caruso, J.), entered November 22, 2010. The order denied plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed with costs.
Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking damages for breach of contract and unjust enrichment based upon defendant’s alleged failure to pay for legal services rendered by plaintiffs. Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs’ motion seeking summary judgment on the complaint and dismissal of the counterclaims. With respect to the complaint, plaintiffs’ own submissions in support of the motion raise triable issues of fact whether defendant owes plaintiffs further compensation pursuant to the legal services contract, and whether plaintiffs performed services in addition to those covered by that contract ( see generally Ulrich v Estate of Zdunkiewicz , 8 AD3d 1014, 1015). Plaintiffs also failed to meet their initial burden of establishing their entitlement to judgment dismissing the counterclaims ( see generally Birt v Ratka , 39 AD3d 1238; Home Sav. Bank v Arthurkill Assoc. , 173 AD2d 776, 777-778, lv dismissed 78 NY2d 1071). Thus, the motion was properly denied, “regardless of the sufficiency of the opposing papers” ( Alvarez v Prospect Hosp. , 68 NY2d 320, 324).

Entered: January 31, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
#### Association of Milk Dealers of Metropolitan New York, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. City of New York, Respondent.

Motion for a stay dismissed, having become academic by virtue of the decision of this court. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and. McNally, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                 28
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          15
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                           418
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      671
<PP&E>                                               2024
<DEPRECIATION>                                        772
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       2109
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 421
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             1
<COMMON>                                               11
<OTHER-SE>                                           1674
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         2109
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      264
<CGS>                                                 319
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         691
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (419)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (419)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (419)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.04)
        




</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2**

**Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of ChiefFinancial and Accounting Officer**

I, Paul C. Wirth, certify that:

l.      I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Credit Suisse First Boston(USA), Inc.;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)               Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)              Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)               Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)               All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)              Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: August 9, 2004 | /s/ Paul C. Wirth |
|---------------------------|-------------------|
|                      | Name:             | Paul C. Wirth |
|                      | Title:            | Chief Financial and Accounting Officer |

 

----
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DIST RICT OF TEXAS F ORT WORTH N O . 2 - 0 9 - 4 5 5 - C V B A N K O F A M E R I C A , N

. A

. A P P E L L A N T V

. W A R R A N T E C H A U T O M O T I V E , I N C

. A P P E L L E E

- - - - - - - - - - F R O M T H E 4 8 T H D I S T R I C T C O U R T O F T A R R A N T C O U N T Y

- - - - - - - - - - 

### M E M O R AN D U M O P I N I O N 1 

### AN D J U D G M E N T

- - - - - - - - - - W e h a v e c o n s i d e r e d a p p e l l a n t ’ s “ M o t i o n F o r D i s m i s s a l W i t h P r e j u d i c e P u r s u a n t T o S e t t l e m e n t
. ” I t i s t h e c o u r t ’ s o p i n i o n t h a t t h e m o t i o n s h o u l d b e g r a n t e d ; t h e r e f o r e , w e d i s m i s s t h e a p p e a l

. S e e T e x . R

. A p p . P

. 4 2

. 1 ( a ) ( 1 ) , 4 3

. 2 ( f )

. C o s t s o f t h e a p p e a l s h a l l b e p a i d b y t h e p a r t y i n c u r r i n g t h e s a m e , f o r w h i c h l e t
e x e c u t i o n i s s u e . P E R C U R I A M P A N E L : M C C O Y , J

. ; L I V I N G S T O N , C

. J

. ; a n d M E I E R , J

. D E L I V E R E D : A p r i l 2 2 , 2 0 1 0

1

 S e e T e x . R

. A p p . P

. 4 7

. 4

.
#### § 585.635 What must I do if I cease activities approved in my COP before the end of my commercial lease?

You must notify BSEE, within 5 business days, any time you cease commercial operations, without an approved suspension, under your approved COP. If you cease commercial operations for an indefinite period, which extends longer than 6 months, we may cancel your lease under § 585.422 and you must initiate the decommissioning process as set forth in 30 CFR part 285, subpart I.
Exhibit 31-27**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Anthony F. Earley, Jr., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 of TheDetroit Edison Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. (Intentionally omitted)  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   /s/ ANTHONY F. EARLEY, JR. Date: November 14, 2006 Anthony F. Earley, Jr.  Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive  Officer of The Detroit Edison Company  
25
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**STATEMENTPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS REQUIRED BYSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of John Deere CapitalCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of ourknowledge:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| May 27, 2005 | */s/ R. W. Lane*      | * * | Chairman and Principal  Executive Officer              |
|-------------------|-----------------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|              |                  |     |                                                   |
|              |                  |     |                                                   |
| May 27, 2005 | */s/ Nathan J. Jones* | * * | Senior Vice President  and Principal Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to John DeereCapital Corporation and will be retained by John Deere Capital Corporation andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

23

----
(April 11, 1962)

#### Shaker Central Trust Fund, Respondent, v. Crusade for Christ, Inc., Appellant.

Motion for stay of proceedings pending appeal to this court from an order denying a motion to set aside a foreclosure sale. Motion granted on the following terms and conditions. 1. That within 10 days of the date of this decision, the defendant-appellant provide security for costs as prescribed by section 593 of the Civil Practice Act. 2. That within 10 days of the date of this decision, the defendant-appellant provide additional security in the amount of $1,000 to safeguard plaintiff-respondent against waste. 3. That the record on appeal and the brief of the defendant-appellant be filed in this court on or before April 23, 1962 and the brief of the plaintiff-respondent be filed on or before April 30, the appeal to be added to the calendar and argued at a term of this court commencing April 30, 1962. Both parties may submit typewritten copies of their respective papers. Coon, J. P., Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur; Bergan, P. J., taking no part.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP MATTERS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 113–66, div. C, title XXXI, §3146(e)(16)(A), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 1078, substituted "DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP" for "ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND WASTE MANAGEMENT" in subchapter heading.
**EXHIBIT 8.1**

 

**List of Subsidiaries**

 

| **Name**                                                            | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Incorporation** | ** ** | **Ownership** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------------|------------|---------------|
|                                                                |       |                              |       |          |
| Administración de Projectos Levon en México, S.A. de C.V. |       | Mexico                            |       | 100%          |
|                                                                |       |                              |       |          |
| Minera El Camino, S.A. de C.V.                                      |       | Mexico                            |       | 100%          |
|                                                                |       |                              |       |          |
| Aphrodite Asset Holdings Ltd.                                       |       | British Virgin Islands            |       | 100%          |
|                                                                |       |                              |       |          |
| Turney Assets Limited                                               |       | British Virgin Islands            |       | 100%          |
|                                                                |       |                              |       |          |
| Valley High Ventures Ltd.                                           |       | Canada                            |       | 100%          |
|                                                                |       |                              |       |          |
| Citrine Investment Holdings Limited                                 |       | British Virgin Islands            |       | 100%          |
|                                                                |       |                              |       |          |
| Minera Titan, S.A. de C.V.                                          |       | Mexico                            |       | 100%          |
|                                                                |       |                              |       |          |
| 1027949 B.C. Ltd.                                                   |       | Canada                            |       | 100%          |
Exhibit 10.3B

                           AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY
                           NOTE DATED MAY 6, 1998

      THIS AMENDMENT is dated as of December 14, 2001 between Roger E.
Brooks ("Brooks") and Intelligent Controls, Inc. (the "Company").

      WHEREAS, Brooks and the Company are parties to that certain Employee
Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of May 1, 1998; and pursuant
to
that Agreement Brooks executed a Promissory Note dated May 6, 1998 in favor
of the Company, in the principal amount of $1,332,500 (the "Note");

      WHEREAS, the Note by its terms is due and payable upon demand after
May 6, 2003; and

      WHEREAS, the Company has offered to extend the maturity date of the
Note by an additional three years;

      NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed that the maturity date of the
Note
shall be extended by three years; that, accordingly, the second paragraph
of
the Note shall be deemed amended to read in its entirety as follows:

         Said principal sum and interest thereon shall be due and payable on
         demand on or after May 6, 2006.

that all other provisions of the Note shall remain in full force and
effect,
without change; and that this amendment shall not be deemed a novation of
the Note.

      IN WITNESS WHERE OF, this amendment has been duly executed by the
parties as of the date first stated above.

INTELLIGENT CONTROLS, INC.

By:  /s  Charles D. Yie                /s Roger E. Brooks
     ----------------------------      ------------------
     Charles D. Yie, Chairman of       ROGER E. BROOKS
     The Compensation Committee
QUICK

CARDTM

Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S)

Hydrogen sulfide is a colorless, flammable, extremely

hazardous gas with a “rotten egg” smell. It occurs naturally in crude petroleum and natural gas, and can be produced by the breakdown of organic matter and human/

animal wastes (e.g., sewage). It is heavier than air and

can collect in low-lying and enclosed, poorly ventilated

areas such as basements, manholes, sewer lines and

underground telephone/electrical vaults.

Detection by Smell

• Can be smelled at low levels, but with continuous lowlevel exposure or at higher concentrations you lose your

ability to smell the gas even though it is still present.

◆ At high concentrations – your ability to smell the gas

can be lost instantly. 

• DO NOT depend on your sense of smell for indicating

the continuing presence of this gas or for warning of

hazardous concentrations.

Health Effects 

Health effects vary with how long, and at what level, you

are exposed. Asthmatics may be at greater risk.

• Low concentrations – irritation of eyes, nose, throat, or

respiratory system; effects can be delayed.

• Moderate concentrations – more severe eye and respiratory effects, headache, dizziness, nausea, coughing,

vomiting and difficulty breathing. 

• High concentrations – shock, convulsions, unable to

breathe, coma, death; effects can be extremely rapid

(within a few breaths).

Before Entering Areas with

Possible Hydrogen Sulfide 

• The air needs to be tested for the presence and concentration of hydrogen sulfide by a qualified person

using test equipment. This individual also determines

if fire/explosion precautions are necessary. 

• If gas is present, the space should be ventilated.

• If the gas cannot be removed, use appropriate respiratory protection and any other necessary personal protective equipment (PPE), rescue and communication

equipment. Atmospheres containing high concentrations (greater than 100 ppm) are considered immediately dangerous to life and health (IDLH) and a selfcontained breathing apparatus (SCBA) is required.

OSHA 3300-10N-05

U.S. Department of Labor

www.osha.gov (800) 321-OSHA

For more complete information:

Occupational

Safety and Health

Administration