alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,293,053
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,203,918
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (100,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 17,429,201
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            35,946,518
<PP&E>                                      22,553,915
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,187,058
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              53,470,898
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,375,824
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,110,641
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,287,437
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                53,470,898
<SALES>                                     24,865,642
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,898,069
<CGS>                                       16,577,368
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               23,353,099
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,775,731
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             512,838
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,032,132
<INCOME-TAX>                                   238,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   794,132
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26
        

</TABLE>
#### § 57.13012 Compressor air intakes.

Compressor air intakes shall be installed to ensure that only clean, uncontaminated air enters the compressors.
#### § 57.15004 Eye protection.

All persons shall wear safety glasses, goggles, or face shields or other suitable protective devices when in or around an area of a mine or plant where a hazard exists which could cause injury to unprotected eyes.
#### § 733.5 Definitions.

As used in this part, the following terms have the specified meanings:

*Action plan* means a detailed plan that the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE) prepares to resolve a State regulatory program issue identified during OSMRE's oversight of a State regulatory program and that includes a schedule that contains specific requirements that a State regulatory authority must achieve in a timely manner.

*State regulatory program issue* means an issue OSMRE identifies during oversight of a State or Tribal regulatory program that may result from a State regulatory authority's implementation, administration, enforcement, or maintenance of all or any portion of its State regulatory program that is not consistent with the basis for OSMRE's approval of the State program. This may include, but is not limited to, instances when a State regulatory authority has not adopted and implemented program amendments that are required under § 732.17 and subchapter T of this chapter, and issues related to the requirement in section 510(b) of the Act that a State regulatory authority must not approve a permit or revision to a permit, unless the State regulatory authority finds that the application is accurate and complete and that the application is in compliance with all requirements of the Act and the State regulatory program. State regulatory program issues will be considered as possible violations and will initially proceed, and may be resolved, under part 842 of this chapter.

[89 FR 24734, Apr. 9, 2024]
**Exhibit
      32.1**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







In
      connection with the Annual Report of Simclar, Inc, (the “Company”) on Form
      10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Barry J. Pardon,
      President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Barry J.
      Pardon


Barry
      J.
      Pardon, President


Simclar,
      Inc.


October
      27, 2006
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-75093, 333-10739, 333-79163 and 333-104745)
of Integra Bank Corporation of our report dated March 10, 2005 relating to the
consolidated financial statements, management's assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Columbus, Ohio
March 10, 2005
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ernest Goins, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 27, 1977, affirmed (see *People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230). Hopkins, J. P., Suozzi, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
### §3311. Submittal to Congress by heads of elements of intelligence community of plans for orderly shutdown in event of absence of appropriations

#### (a) In general

Whenever the head of an applicable agency submits a plan to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget in accordance with section 124 of Office of Management and Budget Circular A–11, pertaining to agency operations in the absence of appropriations, or any successor circular of the Office that requires the head of an applicable agency to submit to the Director a plan for an orderly shutdown in the event of the absence of appropriations, such head shall submit a copy of such plan to the following:

(1) The congressional intelligence committees.

(2) The Subcommittee on Defense of the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate.

(3) The Subcommittee on Defense of the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.

(4) In the case of a plan for an element of the intelligence community that is within the Department of Defense, to—

(A) the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate; and

(B) the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives.

#### (b) Head of an applicable agency defined

In this section, the term "head of an applicable agency" includes the following:

(1) The Director of National Intelligence.

(2) The Director of the Central Intelligence Agency.

(3) Each head of each element of the intelligence community that is within the Department of Defense.

(Pub. L. 113–126, title III, §323, July 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 1401.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definition

For definition of "congressional intelligence committees" referred to in subsec. (a)(1), see section 2 of Pub. L. 113–126, set out as a note under section 3003 of this title.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 10, 2012

jam 

# Order

April 10, 2012

144906 (29)

DERRICK ALLISON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 144906

CoA: 306340 VICTORIA HOOD,

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________ ________________

On order of the Court, the motion to waiv e fees is considered and it is DENIED

because MCL 600.2963 re quires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable for filing fees. Appellant is not required to pay an initial partial fee. However, for an appeal to be filed, appellant must resubmit a copy of this order, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned with this order within 21 days. By doing this, appellant becomes responsible for paying the $375.00 filing fee. Failu re to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being filed in this Court. If appellant timely refiles the pleadings, m onthly payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of the deposits made to appellant’s account until the payments equal the total amount of the filing fee stated above. That

amount shall then be remitted to this Court. Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) pl aintiff shall not file further appeals in this Court until the entry fee in this ca se is paid in full.

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this orde r to appellant and return appellant’s pleadings with this order.
#### § 7.25 Critical characteristics.

A sample of each batch or lot of brattice cloth and ventilation tubing shall be flame tested or a sample of each batch or lot of the materials that contribute to the flame-resistance characteristic shall be inspected or tested to ensure that the finished product will meet the flame-resistance test.
### §4318. Claims of naturalized citizens as affected by expatriation

The claim of any naturalized American citizen under the provisions of this chapter shall not be denied on the ground of any presumption of expatriation which has arisen against him, under the second sentence of section 2 of the Act entitled "An Act in reference to the expatriation of citizens and their protection abroad," approved March 2, 1907, if he shall give satisfactory evidence to the President, or the court, as the case may be, of his uninterrupted loyalty to the United States during his absence, and that he has returned to the United States, or that he, although desiring to return, has been prevented from so returning by circumstances beyond his control.

(Oct. 6, 1917, ch. 106, §21, as added Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 285, §2, 42 Stat. 1516.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act Oct. 6, 1917, ch. 106, 40 Stat. 411, known as the Trading with the enemy Act, also known as the Trading with the Enemy Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 4301 of this title and Tables.

The second sentence of section 2 of the Act entitled "An Act in reference to the expatriation of citizens and their protection abroad," approved March 2, 1907, referred to in text, is the second sentence of section 2 of act Mar. 2, 1907, ch. 2534, 34 Stat. 1228, which was classified to section 17 of Title 8, Aliens and Nationality, prior to repeal by act Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 876, title I, subch. V, §504, 54 Stat. 1172. See section 1481(a) of Title 8.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 21 of the former Appendix to this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
§ 581.31 Overriding royalties. ( a ) Subject to the approval of the Secretary, an overriding royalty interest may be created by an assignment pursuant to section 8(e) of the Act. The Secretary may deny approval of an assignment which creates an overriding royalty on a lease whenever that denial is determined to be in the interest of conservation, necessary to prevent premature abandonment of a producing mine, or to make possible the mining of economically marginal or low-grade ore deposits. In any case, the total of applicable overriding royalties may not exceed 2.5 percent or one-half the base royalty due the Federal Government, whichever is less.
( b ) No transfer or agreement may be made which creates an overriding royalty interest unless the owner of that interest files an agreement in writing that such interest is subject to the limitations provided in § 581.30 of this part, paragraph (a) of this section, and § 581.32 of this part.
C. A. No. 76-77.

#### State *v.*Francis J. Paquette.

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *John R. McDermott,*Special Asst. Attorney General, for plaintiff.

*William F. Reilly,*Public Defender, *Barbara Hurst, John A. MacFadyen III,*Asst. Public Defenders, for defendant.

Petition! for reargument is denied.
### §41306. Simplified procedure to apply for, amend, modify, and suspend permits

(a) Regulations.—The Secretary of Transportation shall prescribe regulations that simplify the procedure for—

(1) acting on an application for a permit to provide foreign air transportation under section 41302 of this title; and

(2) amending, modifying, or suspending any part of that permit under section 41304(a) or (b) of this title.

(b) Notice and Opportunity To Respond.—Regulations under this section shall provide for notice and an opportunity for each interested person to file appropriate written evidence and argument. An oral evidentiary hearing is not required to be provided under this section.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1128.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 41306(a) | 49 App.:1372(h) (1st sentence). | Aug. 23, 1958, Pub. L. 85–726, 72 Stat. 731, §402(h); added Oct. 24, 1978, Pub. L. 95–504, §21(b)(1), 92 Stat. 1723. |
| | 49 App.:1551(b)(1)(E). | Aug. 23, 1958, Pub. L. 85–726, 72 Stat. 731, §1601(b)(1)(E); added Oct. 4, 1984, Pub. L. 98–443, §3(e), 98 Stat. 1704. |
| 41306(b) | 49 App.:1372(h) (last sentence). | |

Section

In subsection (a)(1), the words "acting on" are substituted for "disposition of" for consistency. The word "provide" is substituted for "engage in" for consistency in the revised title.

In subsection (a)(2), the word "alteration" is omitted as surplus. The word "transfer" is omitted because 49 App.:1372(f) does not cover transfer of a permit.

In subsection (b), the word "adequate" is omitted as surplus.
Exhibit 31.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Elan Sigal, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-f of RADA Electronic Industries
Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
Subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  April 15, 2004

/s/ Elan Sigal *
----------------
Elan Sigal
Chief Financial Officer

* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
#### § 57.19011 Drum flanges.

Flanges on drums shall extend radially a minimum of 4 inches or three rope diameters beyond the last wrap, whichever is the lesser.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DIONICS,
INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                          324,200
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   177,500
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     397,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                924,800
<PP&E>                          1,686,300
<DEPRECIATION>                  1,626,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,006,900 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           164,000
<BONDS>                         1,280,400
<COMMON>                        38,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<OTHER-SE>                      1,522,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,006,900
<SALES>                         426,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                426,400
<CGS>                           298,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   378,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              18,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 31,800
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             31,800
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    31,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   .008
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .008


</TABLE>
#### Robert Porazzo et al., Appellants, v City of New York et al., Respondents.

[834 NYS2d 298]—

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J.), dated January 18, 2006, as granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action based on an alleged violation of Labor Law § 241 (6).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In response to the defendants’ prima facie demonstration of their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiffs failed to submit evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact. Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the open, ground level of the work site where the injured plaintiff fell did not constitute a passageway, walkway, or other elevated working surface contemplated by 12 NYCRR 23-1.7 (d) (see *Roberts v Worth Constr., Inc.,*21 AD3d 1074, 1077 [2005]; *Morra v White,*276 AD2d 536 [2000]; *Lawyer v Hoffman,*275 AD2d 541, 542 [2000]; *Constantino v Kreisler Borg Florman Gen. Constr. Co.,*272 AD2d 361 [2000]).

The appellants’ remaining contention is without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Mastro, Carni and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9397 

To prohibit Federal funds from being made available to any law enforcement 

agency that employs an alien as a law enforcement officer, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 23, 2024 

Mrs. CAMMACK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit Federal funds from being made available to 

any law enforcement agency that employs an alien as 

a law enforcement officer, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Citizen-Only Police Act 

5 of 2024’’ or the ‘‘COP Act of 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9397 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON AVAILABILITY OF FEDERAL 

2 FUNDS. 

3 No Federal funds may be made available to any law 

4 enforcement agency that employs an alien as a law en5 forcement officer. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
INTERNATIONAL WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          82,766
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      276
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,768
<PP&E>                                          12,214
<DEPRECIATION>                                     516
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 183,475
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,496
<BONDS>                                         71,623
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          102,519
<PREFERRED>                                          9
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,578
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   183,475
<SALES>                                            532
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   532
<CGS>                                              541
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      541
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   665
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,663
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,851)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,851)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>