alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD & PRESIDENT

                                  Exhibit 32.1


DOL RESOURCES, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

We, S. Mort  Zimmerman,  Chief Executive  Officer and Fred M.  Updegraff,  Chief
Financial Officer of DOL Resources,  Inc. (the "Company"),  certify, pursuant to
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (i)  this  Quarterly   Report  on  Form  10-QSB  fully  complies  with  the
          requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (ii) the  information  contained  in this report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of DOL Resources, Inc.



DATE: October 17, 2006

                              /s/ S. MORT ZIMMERMAN
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
               S. Mort Zimmerman, Chairman of the Board, and Chief
                                Executive Officer

                              /s/ FRED M. UPDEGRAFF
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               Fred M. Updegraff,
             Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of OccuLogix, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William G. Dumencu, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/ William G. DumencuWilliam G. DumencuChief Financial Officer and  Treasurer





Dated:   March 26, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      23,890,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               65,284,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,887,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            92,059,000
<PP&E>                                      37,938,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,415,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             425,774,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       45,925,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   193,384,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,502,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               425,774,000
<SALES>                                     95,864,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            95,864,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               86,553,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               442,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,780,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,089,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,583,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,506,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,129,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        






</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Exhibit 12

                       DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE, INC.

         STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                        (In thousands, except for ratio)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                                 For the Nine
                                                          For the Years Ended                                    Months Ended
                                       -------------------------------------------------------     ----------   ---------------
                                         1994            1995           1996          1997           1998          Sep-99
<S>                                    <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Earnings:
   Income before provision for
     income taxes                      $  205,000     $  298,500     $  473,800     $  661,100     $  600,500     $  650,000

Add: Fixed  Charges
   Interest expense (gross)             2,116,655      2,699,769      2,865,800      4,012,209      4,501,242      3,397,296
     Interest factor in rents              18,565         22,064         25,515         29,351         38,517         37,383
                                       ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------

     Total fixed charges                2,135,220      2,721,833      2,891,315      4,041,560      4,539,759      3,434,679

Earnings before fixed charges,
   and  provision for income taxes     $2,340,220     $3,020,333     $3,365,115     $4,702,660     $5,140,259     $4,084,679
                                       ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges           1.10           1.11           1.16           1.16           1.13           1.19
                                       ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS
I, R. W. Lane, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of John Deere Capital Corporation;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date:
June 01, 2004
By:*/s/ R. W. Lane
R. W. Lane
Principal Executive Officer

 Page 20*****
Exhibit 10.1









 




September 10, 2002




 




Tim Coffey




The Bank of Nova Scotia




Attn: Acquisition Finance




1 Liberty Plaza, 25th FL




New York, NY 10006




 




Dear Tim:




 




At the request of Aegis Communications Group,

Inc. and in regards to our Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated

December 10, 1999 (together with all amendments and other modifications, if

any, from time to time thereafter made thereto, the “Credit Agreement”), please

use this letter as authorization to reduce our available line of credit from $35,000,000

to $30,000,000, effective September 15, 2002.




 




Please feel free to call me at 678-443-6512

if you have any questions.




 




Best regards,




 




/s/ Michael J. Graham




 




Michael J. Graham




Executive Vice President—Corporate

Development and Chief Financial Officer




Aegis Communications Group, Inc.




tmv




 




cc:   Paul Keller, Aegis Communications Group, Inc.


Todd Vines, Aegis Communications Group, Inc.
§ 585.106 What happens if I fail to comply with this part? ( a ) BOEM may take appropriate corrective action under this part if you fail to comply with applicable provisions of Federal law, the regulations in this part, other applicable regulations, any order of the Director, the provisions of a lease or grant issued under this part, or the requirements of an approved plan or other approval under this part.
( b ) BOEM may issue to you a notice of noncompliance if we determine that there has been a violation of the regulations in this part, any order of the Director, or any provision of your lease, grant, or other approval issued under this part. When issuing a notice of noncompliance, BOEM will serve you at your last known address.
( c ) A notice of noncompliance will tell you how you failed to comply with this part, any order of the Director and/or the provisions of your lease, grant or other approval, and will specify what you must do to correct the noncompliance and the time limits within which you must act.
( d ) Failure of a lessee, operator, or grant holder to take the actions specified in a notice of noncompliance issued under this part within the time limit specified provides the basis for issuance of a cessation order by BSEE, as provided in 30 CFR 285.401 and/or cancellation of the lease or grant by the Secretary as provided in § 585.422.
( e ) BOEM may assess civil penalties, as authorized by section 24 of the OCS Lands Act and as determined under the procedures set forth in 30 CFR part 550, subpart N, if you fail to comply with any provision of this part or any term of a lease, grant, or order issued under the authority of this part: ( 1 ) After notice of such failure and expiration of any reasonable period allowed for corrective action; or
( 2 ) BOEM determines that the failure constitutes, or constituted, a threat of serious, irreparable, or immediate harm or damage to life (including fish and other aquatic life), property, or the marine, coastal, or human environment.
### §3334f. Congressional notification of designation of covered intelligence officer as persona non grata

#### (a) Covered intelligence officer defined

In this section, the term "covered intelligence officer" means—

(1) a United States intelligence officer serving in a post in a foreign country; or

(2) a known or suspected foreign intelligence officer serving in a United States post.

#### (b) Requirement for reports

Not later than 72 hours after a covered intelligence officer is designated as a persona non grata, the Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the congressional intelligence committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a notification of that designation. Each such notification shall include—

(1) the date of the designation;

(2) the basis for the designation; and

(3) a justification for the expulsion.

(Pub. L. 116–92, div. E, title LXVII, §6719, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2229.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

For definition of "congressional intelligence committees", referred to in subsec. (b), see section 5003 of div. E of Pub. L. 116–92, set out as a note under section 3003 of this title.
# C_2023185EN.01000201.xml

| 26.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 185/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 185/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11092 – BLACKSTONE / CDPQ / INVENERGY / AEP RENEWABLES / AEP WIND HOLDINGS / TRENT WIND FARM / DESERT SKY WIND FARM)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 185/02)

On 3 May 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11092. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11092. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Stanley Chandler, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from: (1) a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, rendered January 27, 1960, convicting him, after a non jury trial, of violating sections 974 and 975 of the Penal Law (policy), and sentencing him to pay a fine of $50 or to serve 10 days in the City Prison; and (2) from each and every intermediate order. The fine was paid. Judgment affirmed. No opinion. No separate appeal lies from the intermediate orders, which have been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9424 

To establish the National Equal Pay Enforcement Task Force, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 27, 2024 

Ms. WILLIAMS of Georgia (for herself, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, Ms. BLUNT ROCHESTER, Ms. BONAMICI, Ms. BROWN, Mrs. CHERFILUS-MCCORMICK, Mr. 

COSTA, Ms. DELBENE, Mr. GOTTHEIMER, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. JACOBS, 

Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, Mr. LIEU, Ms. 

MATSUI, Mrs. MCBATH, Ms. NORTON, Mrs. RAMIREZ, Mr. DAVID SCOTT

of Georgia, Mr. TAKANO, Ms. TLAIB, Mr. TORRES of New York, Mr. 

TRONE, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, and Ms. CHU) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To establish the National Equal Pay Enforcement Task 

Force, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equal Pay for Equal 

5 Work Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9424 IH

1 SEC. 2. NATIONAL EQUAL PAY ENFORCEMENT TASK 

2 FORCE. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—There is established the National 

4 Equal Pay Enforcement Task Force, consisting of rep5 resentatives from the Equal Employment Opportunity 

6 Commission, the Department of Justice, the Department 

7 of Labor, and the Office of Personnel Management. 

8 (b) MISSION.—In order to improve compliance, public 

9 education, and enforcement of equal pay laws, the Na10 tional Equal Pay Enforcement Task Force will ensure that 

11 the agencies in subsection (a) are coordinating efforts and 

12 limiting potential gaps in enforcement. 

13 (c) DUTIES.—The National Equal Pay Enforcement 

14 Task Force shall investigate challenges related to pay in15 equity pursuant to its mission in subsection (b), advance 

16 recommendations to address those challenges, and create 

17 action plans to implement the recommendations. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
----

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 4, 2011 |   /s/ G. Wilson Hughes |
|-------------------|-----------------------------|
|              | G. Wilson Hughes            |
|              | President and Director      |
|              | GCI, Inc.                   |

----
(No. 80-CC-0260

#### Charles S. Lawrence and Minnie Johnson Lawrence, Claimants, *v.*The State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed October 16, 1992.*

*Order on petition for rehearing filed August 4, 1993.*

David S. Pochis and Alan D. Katz, Ltd. (Miles M. Dore, of counsel), for Claimant.

Roland W. Burris, Attorney General (Gregory Abbott, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

*2OPINION

Burke, J.

On September 10, 1978, Claimants, Charles Lawrence and Minnie Johnson Lawrence were riding eastbound on the Eisenhower Expressway en route to a family gathering in Gary, Indiana. They entered the Eisenhower Expressway at the Austin Avenue entrance. Mr. Lawrence was operating the motorcycle and Minnie Johnson Lawrence was on the back of the motorcycle. It is the Claimants’ contention that their vehicle became stuck in a longitudinal joint causing the motorcycle, which was travelling 50 to 55 miles per hour, to immediately stop, flinging them over the handlebars some 100 feet.

Mr. Lawrence admitted that he was driving a 1020 CC Kawasaki motorcycle on the date in question. He further admitted that he was not licensed to drive a motorcycle and that it was the largest motorcycle he ever owned. Mr. Lawrence stated that he was changing lanes and the next thing he knew he was flying through the air. As he flew through the air, he looked back for Minnie and noticed that the motorcycle was wiggling back and forth, stuck in some type of crevice or separation in the highway. He claims he landed approximately 100 feet away from the location of the bike. Mrs. Lawrence indicates that she was on the bike and the first sign to her that something unusual was occurring was that the bike just completely stopped and she tumbled forward. She *3received injuries sufficient to keep her hospitalized, but did not suffer head injuries or broken bones.

This Court has repeatedly held that the State is not the insurer of persons traveling upon its highways, but that it does owe ordinary care in the maintenance of its highways. In order to recover on a claim of negligence, the Claimants must establish that there was negligence on the part of the State, that the negligence was the proximate cause of the injury and that the Claimant was not contributorily negligent. The evidence presented by the Claimants, while it is not contradicted, is simply not sufficient. The only evidence that the motorcycle upon which the Claimants were riding was actually stuck in a “groove” while traveling 55 miles per hour is the testimony of Mr. Lawrence that he observed the motorcycle as he was hurling through the air.

Claimants failed to sustain their burden of proof that it was the States negligence which caused their injuries.

It is hereby ordered that the claim of Charles Lawrence and Minnie Johnson Lawrence is denied.

ORDER

Burke, J.

This cause coming to be heard upon Claimants’ motion for rehearing and the Court being fully advised in the premises,

It is hereby ordered that Claimants’ petition is hereby denied.