alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit No. 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 33-60935) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-43363, File No. 333-77109 and File No. 333-130868) of The Peoples BancTrust Company, Inc. of our report, dated January 27, 2006, relating tothe consolidated financial statements appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

/s/ Mauldin & Jenkins, LLC 

Birmingham, Alabama 

March 28, 2006
EXHIBIT No. 21.1
 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
 Percentage Owned
    
    State of IncorporationGreenBank
    
    
    100
    %
    
    TennesseeGreene County Capital Trust I
    
    100% of Common Securities
    
    DelawareGreene County Capital Trust II
    
    100% of Common Securities
    
    DelawareGreenBank Capital Trust I
    
    100% of Common Securities
    
    DelawareCivitas Statutory Trust I
    
    100% of Common Securities
    
    DelawareCumberland Capital Statutory
Trust II
    
    100% of Common Securities
    
    ConnecticutSUBSIDIARIES OF GREENBANKSuperior Financial Services, Inc.
    
    
    100
    %
    
    TennesseeGCB Acceptance Corporation
    
    
    100
    %
    
    TennesseeFairway Title Company
    
    
    100
    %
    
    Tennessee
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion sh o uld not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________ No. 95-30853

_______________________ WILSON OIL CO., INC., ET. AL., Plaintiffs, WILSON OIL CO., INC. Plaintiff-Appellee

versus HERRING GAS CO., INC., Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

_________________________________________________________________ June 11, 1996 Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *

The court has considered appellant’s position in light of the briefs and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so,

we find no reve rsible error of fact or law and no abuse of discretion in his interpretation of the pretrial order and affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the district court.

AFFIRMED
.
Honorable Jim Bates 

Criminal Dlstrlct Attorney 

Hldalgo County 

Edlnburg, Texas 

dpinion NO. W-396 

Re: Questions oonoernlng the 

ellglbllltg of certain indlviduals to hold, at the same 

time, the office of a member 

of the Board of Regents for 

Fan Amerlaan College at Edlnburg and City Commissioner 

Dear Mr. Bates: for the City of Mission. 

You have requested the oplnlon of this offioe on the 

following questions: 

1. Ihe ellglblllty of aertala lndlvlduals to hold,, 

at the same time, the office of a member of the Board 

of Regents for Pan Amerlaan College at Edinburg, 

Hldalgo County, Texas, and City Commissioner of the 

City of Mission, Texas. 

2. The ellglblllty of one to hold, at the same time, 

the office of a member of the Board of Regents for 

Pan Amerloan College at Edlnburg, Hldalgo County, 

Texas, and Chairman of the Democratic Executive 

Committee of Hidalgo County, Texas. 

Since receipt of your request by this office, you have 

advised us that the second question has, or ia about to beoome 

moot, because the term of office of the Individual In question 

as a Regent of Fan Amerlaan College is expiring this month, and 

the time for announcing of candidacy for that office has passed 

without his announcing for re-eleotlon. You have, therefore, 

advised us that you do not desire to have the seaond question 

considered In this Opinion. 

We believe that the first question 15 specifically 

answered by Attorney Gener.?,l',s Opinion No. O-371 and a letter 

opinion, dated Karch 2'1, 3956, and addressed to Honorable Robert 
Honorable Jim Rates, Page 2 (Wy3-396). 

S, Calvert, which cites several other Attorney General's Opinions 

which express the same view as that taken In O-371. In that 

Opinion, this office held that members of the Texas A. and M. 

College staff were not prohibited by Sections 33 and 40 of Article 

XVI of the Texas Constitution from holding offices in the town of 

College Station. 

We believe that Attorney General's Opinion O-371 correctly states the applicable law, and you are, therefore, advlsed 

that it is the opinion of this office that one is not precluded 

from simultaneously holding the offices of a member of the Board 

of Regents for Pan American College at Edinburg, Hldalgo County, 

Texa.s, and City Commissioner for the City of Mission, Texas. 

SUMMARY 

Sections 33 and 40, Article XVI of the 

Constitution of Texas do not prohibit the 

simultaneous holdlng of the offices of a 

member of the Board of Regents for Pawn 

American College at Edinburg, Hldalgo 

County, Texas, and City Commissioner for 

the City of Mission, Texas. 

Yours very truly, 

WILL WILSON 

Attorney General of Texas 

By pl H cJIld&, y: 

B. H. Tlmmlns, Jr. 

Asstatant f BHT:,j> 

AFPHOVED:: 

OPIN'LON COMMITTEE 

Geo. Pi Blackburn, Chairman 

5. Arthur Sandlln 

Marl,etta Payne 

Fred Werkenthl~n 

K,. P. L,rlll,?r 

RWIEWEP FOR THE ATTORJKY GENERAL 

E!Y: W. V. Geppert
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9644 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9644

 To amend the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act to update to the 
      definition of chronically homeless, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2024

Mrs. Chavez-DeRemer (for herself, Mr. Robert Garcia of California, Ms. 
 Pettersen, and Mrs. Kim of California) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act to update to the 
      definition of chronically homeless, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Transitional Housing Protection for 
the Homeless Act''.

SEC. 2. CHRONIC HOMELESSNESS.

    (a) In General.--Section 401(2) of the McKinney-Vento Homeless 
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11360(2)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A)(ii) by striking ``shelter 
        continuously for at least 1 year or on at least 4 separate 
        occasions in the last 3 years; and'' and inserting ``shelter--
                                    ``(I) continuously for at least 1 
                                year; or
                                    ``(II) on more than one occasion 
                                for a cumulative period of 1 year or 
                                more in the last 3 years; and''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (B)--
                    (A) by striking ``A person'' and inserting the 
                following:
                            ``(i) In general.--A person''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(ii) Transitional housing.--A person who 
                        currently lives or resides in a transitional 
                        housing program and has resided there for fewer 
                        than 90 days shall be considered chronically 
                        homeless if such person met all of the 
                        requirements described in subparagraph (A) 
                        prior to entering that program.''.
    (b) Rule Making.--The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development 
shall not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
section issue a rule to update part 578 of title 24, Code of Federal 
Regulations, to reflect the amendments made by this section.
                                 <all>
```
#### Fountain Inn Oil Mill Company, appellee, v. National Lumber Mutual Insurance Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 28,466.

Action on fire insurance policy. Judgment against the company. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William N. Gemmill, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed October 2, 1923.

Rufus M. Potts, Joseph W. Cox and Byron Tyler, for appellant. Culver, Andrews & King, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
Exhibit 10(i)



Exhibit 10(i)



                                   Agreement

This Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between Huayang
International Holdings, Inc. ("HIHI"), a corporation organized in the State of
Nevada, and Huayang International Investment Ltd. ("HIIL"), a corporation
organized in British Virgin Islands, on September 10, 2002. HIHI and HIIL are
sometimes individually referred to herein as a "Party" and together as the
"Parties,"

WHEREAS, pursuant to certain Supply Agreement (the "Supply Agreement") between
HIHI and HIIL dated October 28, 1997, HIIL provided debt financing (the "Debt")
for HIHI in order to support HIHI`s operations;

WHEREAS, the Debt obligation by HIHI under the Supply Agreement which amounts to
$14,787,783 is currently due;

WHEREAS, HIHI currently holds twenty percent interest (equity interest plus
shareholder loan) in three related business entities (jointly the "Hotel Group")
which jointly own a majority interest in Sheraton Shenyang Lido Hotel;

WHEREAS, HIHI desires to pay off part of the Debt with all of its interest in
the Hotel Group ("Hotel Group Interest") and HIIL agrees to receive the Hotel
Group Interest as a payment towards the repayment for the Debt;

WHEREAS, HIHI and HIIL both agree to rely on an independent appraisal of the
fair market value of the Hotel Group Interest as the value of the repayment for
the Debt:

WHEREAS, according to Greater China Appraisal Limited, an independent appraisal
firm headquartered in Hong Kong, the fair market value of the Hotel Group
Interest is $13,102,000; and

WHEREAS, HIIL desires to subsequently transfer the Hotel Group Interest to Yick
Ho Limited, a company organized in Hong Kong ("YHL").

HIHI and HIIL agree as follows:

1) HIHI will sell and transfer the Hotel Group Interest directly to YHL, and
will direct YHL to make payment for the purchase to HIIL or its designee.

2) HIIL will accept YHL's payment for the purchase of the Hotel Group Interest
as a payment of $13,102,000 for the repayment of the Debt owed by HIHI to HIIL.

3) After the sale and transfer of the Hotel Group Interest by HIHI to YHL, the
Debt owed by HIHI to HIIL will be reduced by $13,102,000.

4) Each party shall pay their own expenses in relation to this transaction.

5) This Agreement contains the entire agreement and understanding between HIHI
and HIIL and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings regarding the
sale and transfer of the Hotel Group Interest as a payment for the Debt,

6) This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which
shall be deemed an original and all of which taken together shall constitute a
single agreement.

7) The parties agree to execute any and all other documents and to take such
other action or corporate proceedings as may be necessary or desirable to carry
out the terms hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the date first
above written.



Huayang International Holdings, Inc.      Huayang International Investment, Ltd,

Signed and confirmed by                   Signed and confirmed by

/s/__________________________             /s/__________________________
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Timothy M. Burgess, Distri ct Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation. NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROGELIO BARRAGANCAMPOS, Petitioner–Appellee,

vs. JANET NAPOLITANO et al., Respondents–Appellees. No. 07-15407
D.C. No. CV-06-07057-CRN

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted July 15, 2010 San Francisco, California Before: BYBEE and TALLMAN, Circuit Judge s, and BURGESS, District Judge. ** Rogelio Barragan-Campos (“Barragan-Campos ”) appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus or, alternatively, a writ of mandamus. Barragan-Campos seeks to challenge the reinstatement of his 1989 deportation order and obtain review of Immigration Judge Marilyn J. Teeter’s order terminating his removal proceedings. 

# FILED

JUL 28 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALSWe conclude that the district court co rrectly held that the REAL ID Act of 2005 divested district courts of habeas corpus jurisdiction to hear challenges to final orders of removal, including the rein statement of deportation orders. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(9). However, we also hold thatthe district court possessed jurisdiction to review Barragan-Campos’s direct c onstitutional challenge to the REAL ID Act—that the Act deprives the district c ourt of habeas corpus jurisdiction without providing an adequate substitute in the court of appeals. See Puri v. Gonzales , 464 F.3d 1038, 1041 (9th Cir. 2006). Despite the district court’s error, we uphold the district court’s dismissal since we ha ve expressly repudiated Barragan-Campos’s constitutional claim. Id . (in enacting the REAL ID Act, “Congress . . . provided an adequate substitute for habeas proceedings”); Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Bayona , 223 F.3d 1030, 1034 n. 4 (9th Cir. 2000) (“[W]e may affirm the district court on any ground supported by the record, even if the ground is not relied on by the district court.”). Additionally, the district court did not err in concluding that it lacked jurisdiction to review the Immigration Judge’s decision to terminate removal proceedings. The court correctly dete rmined that it could not review the Immigration Judge’s termination deci sion until Barragan-Campos exhausted his administrative remedies with the BIA. The fact that the BIA has since affirmed the Immigration Judge’s termination order does not mean that the district court erred, nor does it vest us with jurisdiction over this order. AFFIRMED.
# C_2023316EN.01000101.xml

| 6.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 316/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 316/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11168 – WARBURG PINCUS / ADVENT INTERNATIONAL / BAXTER PHARMACEUTICAL SOLUTIONS AND BAXTER ONCOLOGY)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 316/01)

On 17 August 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11168. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11168. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
| 1. | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September      30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for      the period ending September 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      Omega Commercial FinanceCorporation. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      December 16 ,2008                                           |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ Jon S. Cummings, IV                                                |
| Jon      S. Cummings, IVCFO,      and PrincipalAccounting      Officer |

----
### §914. Issuance of bonds and obligations

The legislature may authorize such authorities to issue bonds or other obligations with such security as the legislature may provide and may provide for the disposition of the proceeds of such bonds and all receipts and revenues of such authorities.

(June 25, 1938, ch. 703, §4, 52 Stat. 1203.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Puerto Rican Federal Relations Act which comprises this chapter.
#### § 735.3 Authority.

Section 705 of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1201) authorizes the Secretary to make grants to States for developing, administering, and enforcing State regulatory programs.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 41363 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
DAGOBERTO FLORES

- MARTINEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:12

- CR

- 409

- 1

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Dagoberto Flores

Martinez (Flores) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Flores h a s not fi led a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 16, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-41363 Document: 00512969784 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/16/2015No. 13

- 41363

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-41363 Document: 00512969784 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/16/2015
### §2421. Protection of national security information

#### (a) Policies and procedures required

The Administrator shall establish procedures to ensure the maximum protection of classified information in the possession of the Administration.

#### (b) Prompt reporting

The Administrator shall establish procedures to ensure prompt reporting to the Administrator of any significant problem, abuse, violation of law or Executive order, or deficiency relating to the management of classified information by personnel of the Administration.

(Pub. L. 106–65, div. C, title XXXII, §3231, Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 960.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Mar. 1, 2000, see section 3299 of Pub. L. 106–65, set out as a note under section 2401 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Gregory Williams, Also Known as "Bam Bam”, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from three sentences of the County Court, Nassau County, all imposed June 16, 1977, upon his convictions of conspiracy in the second degree (Indictment No. 45894), attempted robbery in the second degree (Indictment No. 45801) and grand larceny in the third degree (Indictment No. 45807), the sentences being terms of imprisonment of up to four years on the conspiracy conviction, two to six years on the attempted robbery conviction, and up to four years on the grand larceny conviction. Sentences imposed upon the conspiracy and grand larceny convictions affirmed. No opinion. Sentence imposed upon the attempted robbery conviction reversed, on the law, and case remitted to the County Court for resentencing. The court failed to comply with the provisions of section 70.00 (subd 3, par [b]) of the Penal Law when it imposed a minimum sentence. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello and Latham, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 99.1



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") of Double
Eagle Petroleum Company (the "Company") for the quarter ended November 30, 2002,
Stephen H. Hollis, the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
the undersigned's knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  February 12, 2003                            /s/  Stephen H. Hollis
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Stephen H. Hollis
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                     Principal Financial Officer
May 4, 1977.

M. P. No. 77-131.

#### William H. Bailey *v.*William Laurie *et al.*

*John A. O’Neill, Jr.,*for plaintiff.

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *Seymour Posner,*Special Asst. Attorney General, for defendant.

No cause having been shown why bail should not be revoked, the State’s motion to revoke bail is granted.

Bevilacqua, C. J., not participating.