alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited financial statements dated September 30, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       9,104,000
<SECURITIES>                                   555,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,998,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   977,000
<INVENTORY>                                 24,310,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            57,407,000
<PP&E>                                      22,797,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,913,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              91,191,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       44,709,000
<BONDS>                                      7,833,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        51,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,636,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                     44,437,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            44,437,000
<CGS>                                       38,551,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,021,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,774,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,068,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,428,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   258,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,191,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,191,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.62)
        

</TABLE>
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 USC SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: November 14, 2006
    
    /s/ ANTHONY F. EARLEY, JR.

Anthony F. Earley, Jr.Chairman of the Board and ChiefExecutive Officer of The Detroit Edison
Company
  27
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 936 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 936

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
                        indoor tanning services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 2023

Mrs. Miller of West Virginia (for herself, Mr. Ferguson, and Mr. Barr) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
                        indoor tanning services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tanning Tax Repeal Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EXCISE TAX ON INDOOR TANNING SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Subtitle D of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended by striking chapter 49 and by striking the item relating to 
such chapter in the table of chapters of such subtitle.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to services performed after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460


## APR 132012 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION The Honorable Jon Tester United States Senate Washington, D.C, 20510

. Dear SenatorTester:

Thank you for your letter ofFebruary 17,2012, to AdministratorJackson, co-signed by Senator Baucus, concerning the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's upcoming actions on the MontanaRegional Haze Federallrnplementation Plan (FIP). The Administratorasked that I respond on herbehalf. In your letter, you express concern about the possible economic impact from ourFIP. You also urge that ourdecisions on costeffectiveness ofcontrols for Best Available RetrofitTechnology (BART) be consistentwith the costs required to comply with health-based standards, and you cite the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule costs as an example. We understand your concerns and note that the Regional Haze Rule requires that a number of factors be weighed in decisions on BART controls, including cost, available technology, energy and non-air impacts, remaining useful life ofequipment and visibility improvement. As EPA Regional AdministratorJim Martin and his staffdiscussed in a briefing with your staffon March 20, the day the proposal was signed, we have endeavored to assess each ofthese factors to support ourpreliminary decisions for BART controls included in the proposed Montana Regional Haze FIP. I In the FIP we are proposing nitrogen oxides (NOx) BART controls for two cement plants (Ash Grove Cement and Holcim) and NOx and sulfurdioxide (S02) BART controls fortwo power plant units (PPL Montana Colstrip PowerPlant

- Units I and 2). We are proposing reasonable progress controls forNOx fortwo engines at the Devon Energy

- Blaine County Compressor Station. We estimate that ourproposed FIP would reduce NOx emissions by about 

### 6,600 tons peryear and S02 emissions by about 

### 8,600 tons peryear. The emission reductions will result in perceptible visibility improvements at the Theodore Roosevelt National Park and at Gates ofthe Mountains Wilderness Area. Perourconsentdecree with WildEarth Guardians, the EPA is obligatedto finalize the Montana FIPby August 

### 15,2012. The proposed FIP will be open for public comment for 

### 60 days following publication ofthis rule and EPA will also hold two public hearings during this time.

1 The FIP can be accessed online at http:www.epa.gov/region8/air

Internet Address (URL)' http./lwwwepa.gov Recycled/Recyclable' Pnnted with vegetable 0,1 Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer. Process Chlonne Free Recycled Paper

### We will put yourletter in the docket for the proposed rule, and we welcome any additional information orcomments you may have on the proposaL Ifyou have further questions on the proposal, please contactme or your staffmay call Josh Lewis in the EPA's Office ofCongressional and Intergovernmental Relations at (202) 564-2095. Sincerely, ('



### inaMcCarthy Assistant Administrator
METAL / NONMETAL 

Serious Accident 

A loader operator was filling a bin when the loader’s bucket hit the upper body of a 

miner who entered the area unannounced. The miner was conscious and talking and 

was immediately transported to a local hospital with non-life threatening injuries.

BEST PRACTICES 

 Always make sure equipment operators see you before entering any area where mobile

equipment is operated. If possible, make eye contact with the equipment operator. When moving 

to a different area, inform the equipment operator before leaving the area. 

 Before moving mobile equipment, look in the direction of travel, use all mirrors, cameras, and

installed proximity detection devices to ensure no one is in the intended path. 

 Ensure that all persons are clear before moving equipment. Sound your horn to warn unseen

persons that you are about to move and wait a few moments to give them time to get to a safe 

location. 

 Ensure that backup alarms on mobile equipment are maintained and operational.
Exhibit
13.1



Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350

(Adopted
by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



In
connection with the Annual Report of SciVac Therapeutics Inc. on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Report”),
each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (i) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SciVac Therapeutics
Inc.



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SciVac Therapeutics Inc. and will be retained
by SciVac Therapeutics Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



March
30, 2016



|By: | /s/
    Curtis A. Lockshin        | 
|--- | --------------------------------- | 
|    | Curtis
    A. Lockshin            | 
|    | Chief
    Executive Officer       | 
|    | (Principal
    Executive Officer) | 
|    |                                   | 
|By: | /s/
James J. Martin               | 
|    | James
    J. Martin               | 
|    | Chief
    Financial Officer       | 
|    | (Principal
    Financial Officer) |
#### § 57.19129 Examinations and tests at beginning of shift.

Hoistmen shall examine their hoists and shall test overtravel, deadman controls, position indicators, and braking mechanisms at the beginning of each shift.
§ 723.18 Procedures for assessment conference. ( a ) The Office shall arrange for a conference to review the proposed assessment or reassessment, upon written request of the person to whom the notice or order was issued, if the request is received within 30 days from the date the proposed assessment or reassessment is received.
( b ) ( 1 ) The Office shall assign a conference officer to hold the assessment conference. The assessment conference shall not be governed by section 554 of title 5 of the United States Code, regarding requirements for formal adjudicatory hearings. The assessment conference shall be held within 60 days from the date the conference request is received or the end of the abatement period, whichever is later.
( 2 ) The Office shall post notice of the time and place of the conference at the regional, district or field office closest to the mine at least 5 days before the conference. Any person shall have a right to attend and participate in the conference.
( 3 ) The conference officer shall consider all relevant information on the violation. Within 30 days after the conference is held, the conference officer shall either: ( i ) Settle the issues, in which case a settlement agreement shall be prepared and signed by the conference officer on behalf of the Office and by the person assessed; or
( ii ) Affirm, raise, lower, or vacate the penalty.
( 4 ) An increase or reduction of a proposed civil penalty assessment of more than 25 percent and more than $500 shall not be final and binding on the Secretary, until approved by the Director or his designee.
( c ) The conference officer shall promptly serve the person assessed with a notice of his or her action in the manner provided in 30 CFR 723.17(b) and shall include a worksheet if the penalty has been raised or lowered. The reasons for the conference officer's action shall be fully documented in the file.
( d ) ( 1 ) If a settlement agreement is entered into, the person assessed will be deemed to have waived all rights to further review of the violation or penalty in question, except as otherwise expressly provided for in the settlement agreement. The settlement agreement shall contain a clause to this effect.
( 2 ) If full payment of the amount specified in the settlement agreement is not received by the Office within 30 days after the date of signing, the Office may enforce the agreement or rescind it and proceed according to paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this section within 30 days from the date of the rescission.
( e ) The conference officer may terminate the conference when he determines that the issues cannot be resolved or that the person assessed is not diligently working toward resolution of the issues.
[45 FR 58783, Sept. 4, 1980, as amended at 53 FR 3674, Feb. 8, 1988; 56 FR 10063, Mar. 8, 1991]
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.610 Diesel engine air intakes.

You must equip diesel engine air intakes with a device to shut down the diesel engine in the event of runaway. Diesel engines that are continuously attended must be equipped with remotely operated, manual, or automatic shutdown devices. Diesel engines that are not continuously attended must be equipped with automatic shutdown devices.

[81 FR 36149, June 6, 2016]
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.503 Emergency shutdown system.

When well-completion operations are conducted on a platform where there are other hydrocarbon-producing wells or other hydrocarbon flow, an emergency shutdown system (ESD) manually controlled station shall be installed near the driller's console or well-servicing unit operator's work station.
#### In the Matter of James F. Wood, Individually, and as Foreman of the May 1959 Term of the Grand Jury for the County of Schenectady, Petitioner, against Charles M. Hughes, as Justice of the Supreme Court of the Fourth Judicial District of the State of New York, Respondent.

Petitioner, individually and as foreman of the Grand Jury sitting in connection with the May 1959 Term of Supreme Court in Schenectady County, seeks an order compelling respondent in his capacity as Supreme Court Justice who presided at that term, to open and file as a public record a report returned by the Grand Jury and ordered *894sealed by respondent. The Attorney-General, representing respondent, has filed objections in point of law to the petition pursuant to section 1293 of the Civil Practice Act. The first objection is that the petitioner fails to allege facts sufficient to entitle petitioner to relief. The real question presented is whether the Grand Jury is vested with any legal authority to present to the court a report which charges no crime or criminal offense, and if it does so whether the court is bound to receive it openly. Beyond constitutional or statutory authority a Grand Jury has no power. The pertinent provisions relating to the existence and powers of a Grand Jury in this State are: section 6 of article I of the Constitution; sections 223, 245, 252 and 253 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. With certain exceptions, not applicable here (dealing with prisoners and jail inspection and corruption of public officers [which would constitute a crime]), we find nothing in the law which authorizes a Grand Jury to deal with anything but criminal acts committed or triable within the county. Not only is express authority lacking to report matters not charging a criminal offense, but nothing may be found which imposes any duty upon the court to accept such a report and openly file it. *(Matter of Grand Jury Assn.*v. *Schweitzer,*11 A D 2d 761; *Matter of Grand Jury {T.V. Quiz Program),*19 Mise 2d 682.) Since *Matter of Jones*V. *People*(101 App. Div. 55 [1905]) and before, there has been a wide divergence of authority on this subject. (See 55 Col. L. Rev. 1103.) The only reported case in this department is *Matter of Funston*.(133 Mise. 620), wherein Mr. Justice Heffernan observed that such reports or presentments as have been filed have been *“*tolerated ” but not authorized. In any event we think the Justice lawfully designated to preside over a term of the Supreme Court must have discretion in supervising all its functions and in determining what is useful and what might be harmful. The extraordinary remedy of mandamus should not be exercised to interfere with that function unless there is a clear violation of a legal duty, which is not the case here. Motion to dismiss the petition granted, and the petition is dismissed, without costs. Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.
#### Alice S. Hager et al. *v.*John Hager et al.

*Edward N. Lerner,*in support of the petition.

*John Lackland,*in opposition.

Decided January 6, 1993

The plaintiff Alan Hager’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 908 (AC 10972), is denied.
Davis, Della (OST) 

Subject: FW: Applications of Amerijet International, Inc. Dockets OST-1997-2183 and 

OST -2011-0083 

From: John Richardson [mailto:jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com] 

Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 11:05 AM 

To: Finamore, Robert (OST) 

Cc: Gretch, Paul (OST); Kruger, Brett (OST); rsilverberq@sqbdc.com; 'Kass, Howard E.'; robert.wirick@aa.com; 

abigail.donovan@aa.com; rpommer@atlasair.com; john@mietuslaw.com; sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com; 

chris.walker@delta.com; 'Nancy Sparks'; cefelts@fedex.com; kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com; agoerlich@gghairlaw.com; dan.weiss@united.com; steve.morrissey@united.com; gmurphy@crowell.com; anita.mosner@hklaw.com; 

jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com; 'Mark Atwood (matwood@cozen.com)'; 'Dawn Pefley'; 'Jonathan Hill'; 

'john.duncan@faa.gov'; 'John Richardson'; 'Michelle Riordan' 

Subject: Applications of Amerijet International, Inc. Dockets OST-1997-2183 and OST-2011-0083 

On March 16, 2015, we filed two applications with the Department on behalf of Amerijet seeking renewal of exemptions 

. previously awarded to Amerijet and requesting expedited action on those applications. We served the parties indicated 

and asked them to inform us as to whether they had any objection to Department approval of Amerijet's request. We 

have been informed by all parties served that they have no such objection. Accordingly, Amerijet respectfully requests 

that the Department approve those applications before the exemptions expire by the terms of the Notices awarding 

them. Respectfully submitted, John Richardson, Counsel for Amerijet 

·- ; 

. ' 

= 

,...; 

1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          62,182
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               37,236,361
<ALLOWANCES>                                 5,695,418
<INVENTORY>                                 20,409,546
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            55,696,007
<PP&E>                                      11,993,047
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,264,081
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              93,131,886
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,053,766
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,574
<OTHER-SE>                                  38,343,113
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                93,131,886
<SALES>                                     42,394,650
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            42,394,650
<CGS>                                       35,811,984
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               35,811,984
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,019,034
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,040,685
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,477,053)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    25,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (3,502,053)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,502,053)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.98)





</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9612 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9612

To prohibit the importation of platinum and palladium from the Russian 
                              Federation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 16, 2024

Mr. Rosendale introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the importation of platinum and palladium from the Russian 
                              Federation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON THE IMPORTATION OF PLATINUM AND PALLADIUM 
              FROM THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

    The President shall prohibit the importation of platinum and 
palladium from the Russian Federation.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1











CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective Amendment No. 13 to the Registration Statement on Form S-14 (File No. 2-96149) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-221133) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-28631, 33-10218, 33-13210, 33-14561, 33-48781, 33-59109, 333-43478, 333-43484, 333-128494, 333-139523, 333-148070, 333-156188, 333-167516, 333-170185, 333-204477 and 333-209701) of Altria Group, Inc. of our reports dated March 15, 2018, relating to the 2017 and 2016 consolidated financial statements and the retrospective adjustments to the 2015 financial statement disclosures of Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding retrospective adjustments to the 2015 consolidated financial statement disclosures on segment information), and the effectiveness of Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, appearing in Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2017, which are incorporated by reference into this Amendment No. 1 to Altria Group, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.





Zaventem, May 31, 2018








/s/Joël Brehmen


DELOITTE Bedrijfsrevisoren / Reviseurs d’Entreprises


BV o.v.v.e. CVBA / SC s.f.d. SCRL


Represented by Joël Brehmen