alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 56.14132 Horns and backup alarms. ( a ) Manually-operated horns or other audible warning devices provided on self-propelled mobile equipment as a safety feature shall be maintained in functional condition.
( b ) ( 1 ) When the operator has an obstructed view to the rear, self-propelled mobile equipment shall have— ( i ) An automatic reverse-activated signal alarm;
( ii ) A wheel-mounted bell alarm which sounds at least once for each three feet of reverse movement;
( iii ) A discriminating backup alarm that covers the area of obstructed view; or
( iv ) An observer to signal when it is safe to back up.
( 2 ) Alarms shall be audible above the surrounding noise level.
( 3 ) An automatic reverse-activated strobe light may be used at night in lieu of an audible reverse alarm.
( c ) This standard does not apply to rail equipment.
§ 57.5006 Restricted use of chemicals. The following chemical substances shall not be used or stored except by competent persons under laboratory conditions approved by a nationally recognized agency acceptable to the Secretary. ( a ) Carbon tetrachloride,
( b ) Phenol,
( c ) 4-Nitrobiphenyl,
( d ) Alpha-naphthylamine,
( e ) 4,4-Methylene Bis (2-chloroaniline),
( f ) Methyl-chloromethyl ether,
( g ) 3,3 Dichlorobenzidine,
( h ) Bis (chloromethyl) ether,
( i ) Beta-napthylamine,
( j ) Benzidine,
( k ) 4-Aminodiphenyl,
( l ) Ethyleneimine,
( m ) Beta-propiolactone,
( n ) 2-Acetylaminofluorene,
( o ) 4-Dimethylaminobenzene, and
( p ) N-Nitrosodimethylamine.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RADICA HARRIPERSAD,

Appellant,

v.

LAKE PARK GARDENS #1, INC., a condominium,

Appellee.

Nos. 4D2023-0318 and 4D2023-0319

[November 15, 2023]

Consolidated appeals from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael Robinson, Judge; L.T. Case 

Nos. CACE20-11497 and CACE20-10884.

Herbert B. Dell of Herbert B. Dell, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Scott R. Shapiro of Straley | Otto, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We consolidate these cases for purposes of this opinion. Appellant 

challenges the entry of partial summary judgments against her in two 

related cases. She claims that the trial court erred by enforcing a 

settlement agreement against her as to both cases without an evidentiary 

hearing to determine whether a settlement had been reached, and by 

enforcing the settlement at the same hearing in which the court allowed 

her prior attorney to withdraw, leaving her unrepresented. Appellant 

argues this was a denial of due process. We agree.

When parties dispute whether a settlement agreement has been 

reached, they are entitled to an evidentiary hearing. Architectural Network, 

Inc. v. Gulf Bay Land Holdings II, Ltd., 933 So. 2d 732, 733–34 (Fla. 2d 

DCA 2006). Further, the trial court erred by allowing appellant’s counsel

to withdraw at the same hearing that the court considered the motion to 

compel appellant to sign the settlement agreement, thus leaving appellant

unrepresented. See Buscemi v. 6060 Realty Corp., 654 So. 2d 197, 198

(Fla. 3d DCA 1995). Commendably, appellee has filed a notice that it does 

not contest these issues. We therefore reverse and remand for further 

proceedings.
2

Reversed and remanded.

WARNER, MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Prevención de la Intoxicación por Monóxido 

de Carbono al Usar Generadores Portátiles

Trabajar con generadores portátiles puede exponer a los trabajadores al monóxido de carbón (CO), un gas 

toxico, sin color ni olor. Siga estas buenas prácticas para mantenerse seguro al usar un generador portátil:

 Verificar que no existan daños en el generador o líneas de combustible que estén sueltas. 

 Mantener el generador seco, y darle mantenimiento y operarlo según las instrucciones del fabricante. 

 Nunca usar un generador portátil en espacios interiores, o en espacios cerrados como garajes, 

entrepisos, o sótanos. 

 Los generadores se deben usar en espacios exteriores, pero nunca use un generador si este está cerca 

de puertas, ventanas, o conductos de ventilación que puedan permitir que entre CO y se acumule en 

espacios habitados. 

 Asegúrese que el generador tenga de 3 a 4 pies de espacio disponible en todos los lados y sobre él 

para garantizar una ventilación apropiada. 

 Si usted u otros muestran síntomas de intoxicación por monóxido de carbono—mareos, dolores de 

cabeza, nausea/vómitos, somnolencia, confusión, inconciencia—vaya al aire libre de inmediato y 

busque atención médica. No vuelva a entrar en el área hasta que se determine que es seguro volver a 

entrar por un personal adecuadamente capacitado y equipado.

El Programa de Consulta en el Lugar de OSHA ofrece ayuda confidencial y sin costo a empresas 

pequeñas o medianas para establecer y mejorar los programas de salud y seguridad. Los servicios de 

consulta son distintos a las inspecciones de cumplimiento y no resultan en multas o citaciones. Los 

Centros de Educación del Instituto de Capacitación de OSHA ofrecen cursos diseñados para 

trabajadores, patrones y gerentes sobre la identificación de riesgos de seguridad y salud y formas para 

reducirlos. Estos centros de educación están convenientemente localizados alrededor del país.

Los avisos de OSHA se emiten en ocasiones para llamar la atención 

a asuntos y medidas de seguridad y salud de los trabajadores.

 • www.osha.gov • 1-800-321-OSHA (6742) • @OSHA_DOL

OSHA 4106-11 2020 | DOL-OSHA-OOC-2020-110
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3417 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to increase the maximum amount 

of education loans that may be repaid on behalf of officers in the 

Selected Reserve who possess professional qualifications, or are enrolled 

in programs of education leading to professional qualifications, in health 

professions that are needed critically to meet wartime combat medical 

skill shortages. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2005 

Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida (for herself, Ms. HOOLEY, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. PLATTS, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, and Mr. SNYDER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to increase the 

maximum amount of education loans that may be repaid 

on behalf of officers in the Selected Reserve who possess 

professional qualifications, or are enrolled in programs 

of education leading to professional qualifications, in 

health professions that are needed critically to meet wartime combat medical skill shortages. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3417 IH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Education 

3 Loan Payment (HELP) for Citizen Soldiers Act of 2005’’. 

4 SEC. 2. LOAN REPAYMENT AUTHORITY FOR HEALTH PRO5 FESSIONS OFFICERS SERVING IN SELECTED 

6 RESERVE WITH WARTIME CRITICAL MEDICAL 

7 SKILLS. 

8 Section 16302(c)(3) of title 10, United States Code, 

9 is amended by striking ‘‘$50,000’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘$100,000’’. 

Æ
APPENDIX D-1

2011 Onroad Source Annual Inventory

Provided in Electronic Form Only

Bureau of Air Quality

Department of Environmental Protection
[This page intentionally left blank.]
#### In the Matter of the Construction of the Will of Louie Leach, Deceased.

Stay continued, upon condition that the appellant perfects appeal, files and serves record and brief, and is ready for argument at the term to commence March 13, 1961.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 30, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-60534 Summary Calendar

MOHAD RAZA RAZAQ, Petitioner,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A26 091 294

-------------------- Before KING, DAVIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Mohad Raza Razaq, a native and citizen of Afghanistan, petitions this court for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) finding him statutorily ineligible for the withholding of removal under both the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and the Convention Against Torture (CAT) based on his prior conviction for a particularly serious crime. Razaq argues that the BIA applied an incorrect legal standard in determining that he had not rebutted the presumption that his prior conviction was for a particularly serious crime. SeeNo. 06-60534 -2-

In re Y-L- , 23 I. & N. Dec. 270, 276-77 (BIA 2002). We review this contention de novo. See Soriano v. Gonzales , 484 F.3d 318, 320 (5th Cir. 2007). However, to the extent that Razaq is challenging the merits of the determination that his crime was particularly serious, we lack jurisdiction over his claims.
See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1231(b)(3)(B), 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii); Unukhaulu v. Gonzales , 416 F.3d 931, 933 (9th Cir. 2005). Under the INA, an alien is statutorily ineligible for the withholding of removal after “having been convicted by a final judgment of a particularly serious crime.” § 1231(b)(3)(B). Because the withholding of removal under the CAT also shall be denied if the alien falls within § 1231(b)(3)(B), a respondent who has been convicted of a particularly serious crime is likewise ineligible for withholding of removal under the CAT. 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(d)(2). An alien may rebut the presumption that his conviction was for a particularly serious crime by satisfying six criteria set forth in Y-L- , 23 I. & N. Dec. at 276-77. One of those criteria is “merely peripheral involvement by the alien in the criminal activity, transaction, or conspiracy.” Id. at 277. Razaq argues that under Y-L- , the peripheral-involvement criterion “looks to the alien’s own ‘involvement’ in any drug ‘conspiracy,’ separate and apart from the person’s involvement in a particular ‘activity’ or ‘transaction.’” He argues that the BIA thus erred when it rejected his claim based solely on theNo. 06-60534 -3- conclusion that his involvement in the criminal activity or transaction was not peripheral. Razaq’s argument is untenable, however, because Razaq was convicted as a seller, not as a member of a conspiracy. His suggested interpretation of Y-L- is not rational, and his reliance on Lavira v. Attorney General , 478 F.3d 158 (3d Cir. 2007), is unavailing. Accordingly, his petition is DENIED.
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

Octobe r 20, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00520

- CR

Steven Mitchell GARY

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR2945

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa

Steven M. Gary’s motion to dismiss for denial of speedy trial is dismissed for lack of

jurisdiction.

It is so ORDERED on the 20 th day of October , 201 4

.



### PER CURIA M

ATTESTED TO:

____________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
§ 735.25 Financial management. ( a ) The agency shall account for grant funds in accordance with the requirements of Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-102. Agencies shall use generally accepted accounting principles and practices, consistently applied. Accounting for grant funds must be accurate and current.
( b ) The agency shall adequately safeguard all funds, property, and other assets and shall assure that they are used solely for authorized purposes.
( c ) The agency shall provide a comparison of actual amounts spent with budgeted amounts for each grant.
( d ) When advances are made by a letter-of-credit method, the agency shall make drawdowns from the U.S. Treasury through its commercial bank as closely as possible to the time of making the disbursements.
( e ) The agency shall support accounting records by source documentation.
( f ) The agency shall design a systematic method to assure timely and appropriate resolution of audit findings and recommendations.
§ 745.10 Information collection. ( a ) In accordance with 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.,* the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information collection requirements of this part. The OMB clearance number is 1029-0092. This information is needed to implement section 523(c) of the Act, which allows States to regulate surface coal mining operations on Federal lands under certain conditions. States that desire to enter into cooperative agreements to do so must respond to obtain a benefit.
( b ) OSM estimates that the public reporting burden for this part will average 1,364 hours per respondent, including time spent reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of these information collection requirements, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Information Collection Clearance Officer, 1951 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20240; and the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention: Interior Desk Officer, 725 17th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20503. Please refer to OMB Control Number 1029-0092 in any correspondence.
[64 FR 70831, Dec. 17, 1999]
Exhibit 10.272

                                 EXHIBIT 10.272
                                 PROMISSORY NOTE
                                  (NO INTEREST)

$18,000.00                                                  Glendale, California
   June 29, 2000




     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Minda Basa (Payor") promises to pay in lawful money of
the United States of America to Pollution Research and Control Corp., a
California corporation ("Payee"), or order, at Glendale, California, the sum of
$18,000.00 Dollars from the date hereof on the unpaid principal payable in
installments of principal only in the sum of $50.00 Dollars commencing on July
15, 2000 and payable on the same day of each month thereafter until paid in
full.

     The unpaid principal may be prepaid without penalty. Each payment hereunder
shall be credited to the principal amount.

     If each installment under this note is not paid when due, the undersigned
shall pay all costs of collection thereof, including reasonable attorneys' fees,
whether or not suit or action is commenced to enforce payment of this note, and
Payee may, at its option, declare the entire amount of the then unpaid principal
immediately due and payable if such default is not cured within 10 days after
Payee provides the undersigned written notice of such default. The undersigned
hereby waives presentment, notice of dishonor and protest.

     This note is secured by shares of Payee's common stock, no par value (the
"Shares"), pursuant to a certain Stock Pledge Agreement, dated as of June 29,
2000 (the "Pledge Agreement").

     Upon the termination of employment of Payor as an employee of Payee for any
reason, the unpaid balance of this note shall be cancelled, and the pro rata
portion of Shares which then not fully paid for, shall be returned to Payee
pursuant to the terms of the Pledge Agreement.

                                            Payor:



                                            By:  /s/  Minda Basa
                                               --------------------------------
                                                      Minda Basa
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frank Laino, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed. (Appeal from judgment of Oneida Supreme Court, defendant having waived trial by jury, convicting defendant of violation of section 386-j, and subdivision 4 of section 376 of the Tax Law.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.1107-5 Electrical components of fire suppression devices; permissibility requirements.

The electrical components of each fire suppression device used on permissible equipment inby the last open crosscut or on equipment in the return airways of any coal mine shall be permissible or intrinsically safe and such components shall be maintained in permissible or intrinsically safe condition.

[37 FR 15302, July 29, 1972]
§ 552.4 Summary Report to affected States. ( a ) The Director, as soon as practicable after analysis, interpretation, and compilation of oil and gas data and information developed by BOEM or furnished by lessees, permittees, or other government agencies, shall make available to affected States and, upon request, to the executive of any affected local government, a Summary Report of data and information designed to assist them in planning for the onshore impacts of potential OCS oil and gas development and production. The Director shall consult with affected States and other interested parties to define the nature, scope, content, and timing of the Summary Report. The Director may consult with affected States and other interested parties regarding subsequent revisions in the definition of the nature, scope, content, and timing of the Summary Report. The Summary Report shall not contain data or information which the Director determines is exempt from disclosure in accordance with this part. The Summary Report shall not contain data or information the release of which the Director determines would unduly damage the competitive position of the lessee or permittee who provided the data or information which the Director has processed, analyzed, or interpreted during the development of the Summary Report. The Summary Report shall include: ( 1 ) Estimates of oil and gas reserves; estimates of the oil and gas resources that may be found within areas which the Secretary has leased or plans to offer for lease; and when available, projected rates and volumes of oil and gas to be produced from leased areas;
( 2 ) Magnitude of the approximate projections and timing of development, if and when oil or gas, or both, is discovered;
( 3 ) Methods of transportation to be used, including vessels and pipelines and approximate location of routes to be followed; and
( 4 ) General location and nature of near-shore and onshore facilities expected to be utilized.
( b ) When the Director determines that significant changes have occurred in the information contained in a Summary Report, the Director shall prepare and make available the new or revised information to each affected State, and, upon request, to the executive of any affected local government.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9561 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9561

  Making appropriations for the salaries and expenses of certain U.S. 
  Customs and Border Protection employees working during a Government 
         shutdown in fiscal year 2025, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 2024

  Ms. De La Cruz (for herself, Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. Gooden of Texas, Mr. 
Tony Gonzales of Texas, Mrs. Chavez-DeRemer, Mr. Williams of New York, 
 Mr. Bacon, and Mr. Luttrell) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  Making appropriations for the salaries and expenses of certain U.S. 
  Customs and Border Protection employees working during a Government 
         shutdown in fiscal year 2025, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pay Our Border Patrol and Customs 
Agents Act of 2025''.

SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF SALARIES OF CERTAIN CBP EMPLOYEES WORKING DURING A 
              GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN.

    There are appropriated for fiscal year 2025, out of any money in 
the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such sums as are necessary to 
pay, during any period of a lapse in discretionary appropriations 
during such fiscal year beginning on or after the date of the enactment 
of this section, the salaries and expenses of any Agents of the U.S. 
Border Patrol and officers of the Office of Field Operations within 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection excepted from furlough during such 
lapse.
                                 <all>
```
#### Blanche Nathan and A. S. Nathan, appellees, v. William Connors, appellant.

Gen. No. 28,538.

Action for damage to automobile by collision. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Joel C. Fitch, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed November 27, 1923.

Mulcahy and Collins, for appellant; Edmond L. Mulcahy, of counsel. C. D. Jones and Joseph O. McKiernan, for appellees.

Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### § 56.12040 Installation of operating controls.

Operating controls shall be installed so that they can be operated without danger of contact with energized conductors.
### §403–3b. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 403–3b, comprising section 103B of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as section 3027 of this title.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 1, 2015

d0325 

# Order

Clerk April 1, 2015

149813

- 4 & (110)

TOWNSHIP OF WEBBER,

Plaintiff/Counter

Defendant

- Appellant,

v SC: 149813

- 4

COA: 313479; 315050

Lake CC: 11

- 007995

- CH

BRUCE AUSTIN,

Defendant/Counter

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

and

BARBARA FORBES and DALE FORBES,

Defendants,

and

MARC DANEMAN,

Intervening Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for leave to file supplemental brief is

GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the April 22, 2014 judgment of the

Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the

questions pre sented should be reviewed by this Court.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0002125 01-SEP-2016 01:56 PM
§ 560.211 When does an eligible lease qualify for a royalty suspension volume? ( a ) Your eligible lease will receive a royalty suspension volume as specified in the Act. The bidding system in § 560.110(g) applies.
( b ) Your eligible lease may receive a royalty suspension volume only if your entire lease is west of 87 degrees, 30 minutes West longitude.
[76 FR 64623, Oct. 18, 2011. Redesignated at 81 FR 18175, Mar. 30, 2016]