alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT No. 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report ofGreene County Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theannual period ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”), I, James E. Adams,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/                                | James E. Adams |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|----------------|--------|
|   | James E. Adams                          |
|   | Senior Vice  President, Chief Financial |
|   | Officer and  Assistant Secretary        |

 

Date:  March 14, 2006

 

----
Directory of Trails        - Directory of Trails
        - 1. Tidelands Trail - Fremont
        - 2. LaRiviere Marsh Trail -Fremont
        - 3. Shoreline Trail & 4. No Name Trail - Fremont
        - 5. Newark Slough Trail - Fremont
        - 6. Warm Springs Trail - Fremont
        - 7. Coyote Creek Lagoon Trail - Fremont
        - 8. Alviso Slough Trail - Alviso
        - 9. Mallard Slough Trail - Alviso
        - 10. New Chicago Marsh Trail - Alviso
        - 11. Moffett Bay Trail - Sunnyvale
        - 12. Stevens Creek East Trail - Mountain View
        - 13. Faber-Laumeister Trail - East Palo Alto
        - 14. Ravenswood Trail - Menlo Park
        - 15. SF2 Trail - Menlo Park
        - 16. Bair Island Trail - Redwood City

## 5. Newark Slough Trail - Fremont

**Length**5 mile loop

**Amenities and Uses**Parking, restrooms and drinking water nearby at the Visitor Center, hiking, bicycling. No pets.

**Trail Surface**Mostly flat, compacted dirt levee. Turns to mud after rain.

**Highlights**This trail traverses the most common habitat types in the refuge: tidal marsh, tidal slough and salt ponds. The tidal marsh is home to endangered Ridgway’s rails and salt marsh harvest mice— two species only found in SanFrancisco Bay— and the Alameda song sparrow, a Species of Concern in California. Northern shovelers, shorebirds, and grebes fill the pond in the winter while Forster’s terns and American avocets use the pond in the summer. There are excellent views of the dominate salt marsh vegetation such as pickleweed, Pacific cordgrass and gumplant which has yellow flowers late into the summer.

**Connections to Other Trails**Connects to Tidelands Trail. Easy connection to LaRiviere Marsh Trail and Quarry Trail which leads to the Apay Way Trail in Coyote Hills Regional Park. Connects to Marshlands Rd. via Tidelands Trail. Marshlands Rd. is partof the Bay Trail system and crosses over the Dumbarton Bridge.

**Directions to Trailhead**From HWY 84 on the east side of the Dumbarton Bridge in Fremont, take the Thornton Ave. exit. Drive 0.6 miles south on Thornton Ave. and turn right onto Marshlands Rd. Follow Marshlands Rd. 0.5 miles to the stop sign. Turn left into the parking lot. To access the trail, go to the flagpole in the second parking lot and walk the Tidelands Trail. Cross the footbridge and follow the signs onto the Newark Slough Trail.

**Click on map to enlarge.**

****
# C_2023328EN.01000101.xml

| 18.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11106 – STELLANTIS / MICHELIN / FORVIA / SYMBIO)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 328/01)

On 17 July 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11106. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11106. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.1002 Installation of electric equipment and conductors; permissibility. ( a ) Electric equipment must be permissible and maintained in a permissible condition when such equipment is located within 150 feet of pillar workings or longwall faces.
( b ) Electric conductors and cables installed in or in by the last open crosscut or within 150 feet of pillar workings or longwall faces must be— ( 1 ) Shielded high-voltage cables supplying power to permissible longwall equipment;
( 2 ) Interconnecting conductors and cables of permissible longwall equipment;
( 3 ) Conductors and cables of intrinsically safe circuits; and
( 4 ) Cables and conductors supplying power to low- and medium-voltage permissible equipment.
( 5 ) Shielded high-voltage cables supplying power to permissible continuous mining machines.
[67 FR 11004, Mar. 11, 2002, as amended at 75 FR 17553, Apr. 6, 2010]
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                               REPORT ON SCHEDULE
                                       AND
                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of  Directors
MAI Systems Corporation

The audits referred to in our report dated April 13, 2000, included the related
financial statement schedule as of December 31, 1998 and 1999, and for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999, included in the
annual report on Form 10-K. This financial statement schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our
opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the
basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in
all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-92194) on Form S-8, of MAI Systems Corporation of our report dated April 13,
2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of MAI Systems Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1999, and the related consolidated
statement of operations, stockholders' equity (deficiency) and comprehensive
income (loss) and cashflows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1999, and all related schedules, which report appears in the
December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of MAI Systems Corporation.



/s/ KPMG LLP

April 13, 2000
#### § 585.414 [Reserved]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the reference to our firm under "Item 6. Selected Financial Data"
and to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8
No. 33-17642, Form S-8 No. 33-45131, Form S-8 No. 33-45132, Form S-8 No.
33-62863, Form S-8 No. 33-64860, Form S-8 No. 33-72494, Form S-8 No. 33-77586,
Form S-8 No. 33-77590, Form S-8 No. 333-74873, Form S-8 No. 333-68103, Form S-3
No. 33-85898, Form S-4 No. 333-79839 and Form S-8 333-89127) of
InterVoice-Brite, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated April 11, 2000, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
InterVoice-Brite, Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended February 29, 2000.

                                                     ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Dallas, Texas
May 22, 2000
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Surface Transportation Board

          - [Docket No. EP 290 (Sub-No. 5) (2021-1)]

# AGENCY:

Surface Transportation Board.

# ACTION:

Approval of rail cost adjustment factor.

# SUMMARY:

The Board has approved the first quarter 2021 Rail Cost Adjustment Factor (RCAF) and cost index filed by the Association of American Railroads. The first quarter 2021 RCAF (Unadjusted) is 1.040. The first quarter 2021 RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.434. The first quarter 2021 RCAF-5 is 0.410.

# DATES:

*Applicability Date:*                         January 1, 2021.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Pedro Ramirez, (202) 245-0333. Assistance for the hearing impaired is                               ( print page 82566)                            available through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Additional information is contained in the Board's decision, which is available on our website,                     *http://www.stb.gov.*                     Copies of the decision may be purchased by contacting the Office of Public Assistance, Governmental Affairs, and Compliance at (202) 245-0238.                

Decided: December 14, 2020.

By the Board, Board Members Begeman, Fuchs, and Oberman.

Jeffrey Herzig,

Clearance Clerk.

[FR Doc. 2020-27968 Filed 12-17-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
§ 60.1 Scope; compliance dates. ( a ) This part sets forth mandatory health standards for each surface and underground metal, nonmetal, and coal mine subject to the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, as amended. Requirements regarding medical surveillance for metal and nonmetal mines are also included.
( b ) The compliance dates for the provisions of this part are as follows: ( 1 ) For coal mine operators, April 14, 2025.
( 2 ) For metal and nonmetal mine operators, April 8, 2026.
#### Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York, Appellant, v Jerome Comins et al., Respondents.

Order, Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department, entered on May 31, 1977, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Gellinoff, J., at Appellate Term, without costs and without disbursements, and judgment absolute granted dismissing the petition in accordance with the stipulation. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Birns, Fein, Lane and Lynch, JJ.
Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter

Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 05-2444

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

PERRY A. SANTIAGO-SALAZAR,

Defendant, Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

[Hon. Jay Garcia-Gregory, U.S. District Judge]

Before

 Boudin, Chief Judge,

Stahl, Senior Circuit Judge,

and Lipez, Circuit Judge.

Mariángela Tirado-Vales on brief for appellant.

Mariana E. Bauzá-Almonte, Assistant United States

Attorney, Nelson Pérez-Sosa, Assistant United States Attorney, and

H.S. Garcia, United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

August 1, 2006
-2-

Per Curiam. Perry Santiago-Salazar pleaded guilty to

possessing cocaine with intent to distribute after law enforcement

officials seized a cocaine-filled suitcase that he had placed

aboard an airline flight from Puerto Rico to New York. At his

sentencing hearing in the District Court for the District of Puerto

Rico, Santiago-Salazar requested a downward adjustment in his

federal Sentencing Guidelines offense level, arguing that he had

played only a minor role in the offense. See USSG § 3B1.2. The

court denied the adjustment and, after making other applicable

adjustments, sentenced the defendant to 87 months in prison.

On appeal, Santiago-Salazar contends that the district

court erred in declining to grant him the downward adjustment. We

review a district court's role-in-the-offense determination for

clear error. See United States v. Ortiz-Santiago, 211 F.3d 146,

148-49 (1st Cir. 2000) (citing United States v. Ocasio, 914 F.2d

330, 333 (1st Cir. 1990)). The determination whether a defendant

has played only a "minor" or "minimal" role in the offense, USSG §

3B1.2, is "notoriously fact-sensitive." Id. at 148. A defendant

seeking a minor-role adjustment bears the burden of showing that he

is (1) less culpable than most other people involved in the

particular offense for which he was convicted and (2) less culpable

than most other perpetrators of comparable crimes. See United

States v. Mateo-Espejo, 426 F.3d 508, 512 (1st Cir. 2005). The

defendant here has made no such showing. To the contrary, the
-3-

facts indicate that Santiago-Salazar was in charge of the illicit

transaction, since he not only orchestrated the shipment of the

suitcase but had follow-up conversations and meetings with a

confidential source to determine the status of the suitcase and

obtain a receipt for the drugs. The district court cited these

follow-up activities as cause to deny the minor-role adjustment.

We see no clear error in this logical determination. In fact, we

have affirmed denials of minor-role adjustments to defendants who

were simply couriers of contraband and did not engage in follow-up

activities like the defendant in this case. See Mateo-Espejo, 426

F.3d at 512-13 (collecting cases).

Affirmed.
### §401. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 401, comprising section 2 of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as section 3002 of this title.
Exhibit 32-49
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: July 31, 2009
    /S/ ANTHONY F. EARLEY, JR.Anthony F. Earley, Jr.
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of The Detroit Edison Company
#### WARFIELD *vs.*CAMPBELL.

[ACTION ON CASE FOR MALICIOOS ARREST AND IMPRISONMENT ]

1. *When action lies against agent.*— An action on the case lies against an agent or attorney, who, through malice, illegally sues out a *ca. sa.*in the name of his principal.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Mobile.

Tried before the Hon. Alex. McKinstry.

This action was brought by David L. Campbell, against Hazael Warfield, io recover damages for the plaintiff's arrest and imprisonment under a writ of *capias ad satisfaciendum,*alleged to have been sued out by the defendant maliciously and without probable cause, on a judgment in favor of Mary J. Witherspoon against said plaintiff. The only plea was the general issue. The court charged the jury, “that to sustain the action, it must appear that the plaintiff was arrested by the act and procurement of the defendant, and that such arrest was illegal, and procured by motives of malice, and that there was no probable cause for such arrest; that both these grounds must concur, and the jury must be satisfied from the evidence before them that there was malice, as well as illegality and want of probable cause; that malice might be inferred from the want of probable cause, but that malice, either in law or in fact, must exist, in order to make the defendant liable ; that they must determine from the facts and circumstances in evidence before them, and if they found that there was an arrest procured by the defendant, that it was unlawful, and procured with malice, and without probable cause, then the defendant would be liable in this action.” This charge, to which the defendant excepted, is the .only matter assigned as error.

Watts, Judge & Jackson, for appellant.

Geo. N. Stewart, *contra.*

*350A. J. WALKER, C. J.—

An action on the case will lie, tb recover damages for the malicious and illegal suing out of the process of the courts. — McKellar v. Couch, at the last term. The liability to such action extends to the attorney or agent who sues out such process through malice. — Wood v. Weir & Sayre, 5 B. Monroe, 546; Drake on Attachment, § 727; Kirksey v. Jones, 7 Ala. 622. These principles are conclusive to show that there was no error in the charge of the court prejudicial to the appellant.

Judgment affirmed.
#### Tony Stropoli, appellee, v. Boyda Dairy Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 28,544.

Suit for personal injuries sustained through negligent driving of defendant’s automobile truck. Judgment for plaintiff for $2,250. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. E. D. Shurtleff, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court, for the first- district at the March term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed November 27, 1923.

Rehearing denied December 8, 1923.

*Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Edward H. Kubitz, for appellant. Finn & Miller, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §21. Restraint, regulation, and removal

Whenever there is a declared war between the United States and any foreign nation or government, or any invasion or predatory incursion is perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of the United States by any foreign nation or government, and the President makes public proclamation of the event, all natives, citizens, denizens, or subjects of the hostile nation or government, being of the age of fourteen years and upward, who shall be within the United States and not actually naturalized, shall be liable to be apprehended, restrained, secured, and removed as alien enemies. The President is authorized in any such event, by his proclamation thereof, or other public act, to direct the conduct to be observed on the part of the United States, toward the aliens who become so liable; the manner and degree of the restraint to which they shall be subject and in what cases, and upon what security their residence shall be permitted, and to provide for the removal of those who, not being permitted to reside within the United States, refuse or neglect to depart therefrom; and to establish any other regulations which are found necessary in the premises and for the public safety.

(R.S. §4067; Apr. 16, 1918, ch. 55, 40 Stat. 531.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §4067 derived from act July 6, 1798, ch. 66, §1, 1 Stat. 577.

#### Amendments

1918—Act Apr. 16, 1918, struck out provision restricting this section to males.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### World War II Proclamations

The following proclamations under this section were issued during World War II:

Proc. No. 2525, Dec. 7, 1941, 6 F.R. 6321, 55 Stat. Pt. 2, 1700.

Proc. No. 2526, Dec. 8, 1941, 6 F.R. 6323, 55 Stat. Pt. 2, 1705.

Proc. No. 2527, Dec. 8, 1941, 6 F.R. 6324, 55 Stat. Pt. 2, 1707.

Proc. No. 2533, Dec. 29, 1941, 7 F.R. 55, 55 Stat. Pt. 2, 1714.

Proc. No. 2537, Jan. 14, 1942, 7 F.R. 329, 56 Stat. Pt. 2, 1933, revoked by Proc. No. 2678, Dec. 29, 1945, 11 F.R. 221, 60 Stat. Pt. 2, 1336.

Proc. No. 2563, July 17, 1942, 7 F.R. 5535, 56 Stat. Pt. 2, 1970.

Proc. No. 2655, July 14, 1945, 10 F.R. 8947, 59 Stat. Pt. 2, 870.

Proc. No. 2674, Dec. 7, 1945, 10 F.R. 14945, 59 Stat. Pt. 2, 889.

Proc. No. 2685, Apr. 11, 1946, 11 F.R. 4079, 60 Stat. Pt. 2, 1342, set out as a note preceding section 1 of this title.

#### World War I Proclamations

Proclamations issued under this chapter during the years 1917 and 1918 will be found in 40 Stat. 1651, 1716, 1730, and 1772.