alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023141EN.01000901.xml

| 24.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/9

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.11090 – EFMS / SK SQUARE / SK SHIELDUS)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 141/07)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | EQT Fund Management S.à r.l. (‘EFMS’, Luxembourg), |
| --- | --- |

—

EQT Fund Management S.à r.l. (‘EFMS’, Luxembourg),

| — | SK Square Co., Ltd. (‘SK Square’, Republic of Korea), |
| --- | --- |

—

SK Square Co., Ltd. (‘SK Square’, Republic of Korea),

| — | SK Shieldus Co., Ltd (‘SK Shieldus’, Republic of Korea). |
| --- | --- |

—

SK Shieldus Co., Ltd (‘SK Shieldus’, Republic of Korea).

EFMS and SK Square will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of SK Shieldus.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | EFMS is an investment fund that seeks to make investments in infrastructure and infrastructure-related assets and businesses primarily in Europe and North America, |
| --- | --- |

—

EFMS is an investment fund that seeks to make investments in infrastructure and infrastructure-related assets and businesses primarily in Europe and North America,

| — | SK Square is an active portfolio management company and invests in companies active in the new information and communications technologies sectors, |
| --- | --- |

—

SK Square is an active portfolio management company and invests in companies active in the new information and communications technologies sectors,

| — | SK Shieldus is mainly active in the provision of physical security services, cybersecurity services and converged security services. The company is predominantly active in South Korea, with a minor presence in the US and across Europe. |
| --- | --- |

—

SK Shieldus is mainly active in the provision of physical security services, cybersecurity services and converged security services. The company is predominantly active in South Korea, with a minor presence in the US and across Europe.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.11090 – EFMS / SK SQUARE / SK SHIELDUS

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 15


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 5th Street, N.W.
Judiciary Plaza
Washington, D.C. 20549

We are aware that our report dated April 19, 1999 on our review of the interim
financial information of Dexter Corporation as of March 31, 1999 and 1998 and
for the three month periods then ended, and included in this Form 10-Q is
incorporated by reference in the company's registration statements on Form S-8,
Registration Nos. 2-63959, 33-27597, 33-53307, 33-53309, 333-02985, 333-04081,
333-42663 and 333-76873. Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of
1933, this report should not be considered a part of the registration statements
prepared or certified by us within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Springfield, Massachusetts
May 13, 1999
#### § 583.115 What definitions do I need to know?

The definitions at 30 CFR 550.105 apply to this part. In addition, when used in this part, the following terms will have the meaning given below:

*Agreement* means a negotiated noncompetitive agreement that authorizes a person to use OCS sand, gravel, and/or shell resources in a program of, or project for, shore protection, beach restoration or coastal wetlands restoration undertaken by one or more Federal, state or local government agencies, or in a construction project authorized by, or funded in whole or in part by, the Federal government. The form of the agreement will be a Memorandum of Agreement (if one or more of the parties to the agreement, other than BOEM, is a Federal agency) or a lease (if all of the parties to the agreement other than BOEM are non-Federal agencies or persons).

*Amendment* means a modification to the agreement between BOEM and the parties to the agreement that extends or modifies the terms of the agreement.

*Applicant* means any person proposing to use OCS sand, gravel, and/or shell resources for a shore protection, beach restoration or coastal wetlands restoration project undertaken by a Federal, state or local government agency, or a construction project authorized by, or funded in whole or in part by, the Federal Government. If multiple persons or Federal, state, or local governments, other than BOEM, partner on a project they will be considered joint applicants.

*BOEM* means the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management of the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI).

*Borrow area* means the offshore geographic area(s) or region(s) where OCS sand, gravel, and/or shell resources have been identified for potential use in a specific project.

*Federal agency* means any department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States.

*Local government* means the governing authority at the county or city level with jurisdiction to administer a particular project(s).

*Modification* means the process whereby parties to an agreement and BOEM mutually agree to change, alter or amend an existing agreement.

*Placement area* means the geographic area in which OCS sand, gravel, and/or shell resources, used by agreement, will be placed pursuant to that agreement.

*Program* means a group of related projects that may be the subject of a negotiated noncompetitive agreement for the use of OCS sand, gravel, and/or shell resources.

*Project* means an undertaking that may be the subject of a negotiated noncompetitive agreement for the use of OCS sand, gravel, and/or shell resources.

*Secretary* means the Secretary of the Interior.
#### Emanuel Deutsch, Doing Business as Unity Sanitary Supply Co., Respondent, v. National Properties, Inc., et al., Defendants, and I. B. Miller Foundation Co., Inc., et al., Appellants.

Determination of the Appellate Term affirming judgment of the City Court, unanimously modified to the extent of dismissing the complaint, upon the law and the facts, as to the defendant-appellant, 125 Maiden Lane Building Company and remanding to the Civil Court for an assessment of damages against the remaining defendants-appellants, without costs. Plaintiff failed to establish a cause of action against the owner, 125 Maiden Lane Building Company, and its motion to dismiss at the close of plaintiff’s case should have been granted. *(Hyman*v. *Barrett,*224 N. Y. 436; *May*v. *liy2 East 49th St. Go.,*269 App. Div. 180, 185, affd. 296 N. Y. 599; *Lockowitz*v. *Melnyk,*1 A D 2d 138, 140.) The trial court awarded plaintiff $4,639.50 for property damage. The proof thereof is highly unsatisfactory. There was received in evidence an exhibit which purported to list in detail the damaged merchandise. Plaintiff testified that substantially all of this merchandise had sustained water damage that made it unsalable but conceded that at the time of the trial (more than two years after the flooding) only a portion had been discarded. We are unable to determine from the proof the extent of plaintiff’s damage but conclude that the award to him of the total amount of his claimed damage is against the weight of the evidence. “The measure of damages is not the retail selling price but replacement cost and any damages actually sustained by reason of the absence of the articles while in the process of replacement. If the personal property is totally destroyed the market value at the time and place of their destruction should be shown. If the property is only damaged the difference in value immediately before and immediately after the injury should be shown.” *(Dubiner’s Bootery*v. *General Outdoor Adv. Co.,*10 A D 2d 923.) A new trial of this separable issue of damages in this nonjury case is authorized. (CPLR, rule 4404, subd. [a]; 4 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., par. 4404.34; see, also, *Crawford*v. *Town of Hamburg,*19 A D 2d 100, 104.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Bastow, JJ.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Richard Farah, Deceased. Albert Farah et al., as Executors, et al., Respondents-Appellants; Anne Farah, Appellant-Respondent.

Motion by objectant-appellant-respondent to abridge the record on appeal, denied without prejudice to an application for such relief in the Surrogate’s Court *(Hopper*v. *Comfort Coal-Lbr. Co.,*276 App. Div. 869; *Village of Port Chester*v. *Sheehan,*5 A D 2d 839). Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
### MEMORANDUM TO FILE TO: Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR- 2013-0009; Approval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Navajo Nation; Regional Haze Require ments for Navajo Generating Station; Proposed Rule FROM: Anita Lee Date: March 18, 2013 Subject: Record of Meeting with Salt River Project during Public Comment Period 1. Participants at Meeting  Deborah Jordan, EPA  Colleen McKaughan, EPA  Anita Lee, Ann Lyons, and Gerardo Rios, EPA (by phone)  Kelly Barr, SRP  Grant Smedley, SRP  Barbara Sprungl, SRP  Paul Ostapuk, SRP (by phone) 2. Date and Location of Meeting:  March 21, 2013, Phoenix, AZ 3. General Statement of the Topic of Discussion:  Update from SRP on plans at NGS for MATS compliance – SRP conveyed optimism that NGS would not need new baghouses to comply with MATS  Discussion of whether PSD/BACT fo r sulfuric acid mist emissions might require installation of new baghouses at NGS, within the context of (1) the PSD permit for Coronado Generating Station for sulfuric acid emissions that set a su lfuric acid limit that did not require baghouses, and (2) the uncertainty of what a BACT determ ination, perhaps 10 years in the future, might require. 4. Copy of Any Materials Presented or Received:  (none)
#### JACOBSON et al., Appellants, v. BROOKLYN LUMBER CO. et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 27, 1905.)

Action by Morris Jacobson and Arthur C. Jacobson against the Brooklyn Lumber Company, William E. Verity, and Charles E. Robertson. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.705-3 Work on energized high-voltage surface lines; reporting.

Any operator designating and assigning qualified persons to perform repairs on energized high-voltage surface lines under the provisions of § 75.705-2 shall maintain a record of such repairs. Such record shall contain a notation of the time, date, location, and general nature of the repairs made, together with a copy of the information filed with the operator by the qualified person designated as responsible for performing such repairs.
§ 56.4604 Preparation of pipelines or containers. Before welding, cutting, or applying heat with an open flame to pipelines or containers that have contained flammable or combustible liquids, flammable gases, or explosive solids, the pipelines or containers shall be— ( a ) Drained, ventilated, and thoroughly cleaned of any residue;
( b ) Vented to prevent pressure build-up during the application of heat; and
( c ) ( 1 ) Filled with an inert gas or water, where compatible; or
( 2 ) Determined to be free of flammable gases by a flammable gas detection device prior to and at frequent intervals during the application of heat.
#### § 7.82 Definitions.

In addition to subpart A definitions of this part, the following definitions apply in this subpart.

*Brake Power.* The observed power measured at the crankshaft or its equivalent when the engine is equipped only with standard auxiliaries necessary for its operation on the test bed.

*Category A engines.* Diesel engines intended for use in areas of underground coal mines where permissible electric equipment is required.

*Category B engines.* Diesel engines intended for use in areas of underground coal mines where nonpermissible electric equipment is allowed.

*Corrosion-resistant material.* Material that has at least the corrosion-resistant properties of type 304 stainless steel.

*Diesel engine.* Any compression ignition internal combustion engine using the basic diesel cycle where combustion results from the spraying of fuel into air heated by compression.

*Exhaust emission.* Any substance emitted to the atmosphere from the exhaust port of the combustion chamber of a diesel engine.

*Intermediate speed.* Maximum torque speed if it occurs between 60 percent and 75 percent of rated speed. If the maximum torque speed is less than 60 percent of rated speed, then the intermediate speed shall be 60 percent of the rated speed. If the maximum torque speed is greater than 75 percent of the rated speed, then the intermediate speed shall be 75 percent of rated speed.

*Low idle speed.* The minimum no load speed as specified by the engine manufacturer.

*Maximum torque speed.* The speed at which an engine develops maximum torque.

*Operational range.* All speed and load (including percent loads) combinations from the rated speed to the minimum permitted engine speed at full load as specified by the engine manufacturer.

*Particulates.* Any material collected on a specified filter medium after diluting exhaust gases with clean, filtered air at a temperature of less than or equal to 125 °F (52 °C), as measured at a point immediately upstream of the primary filter. This is primarily carbon, condensed hydrocarbons, sulfates, and associated water.

*Percent load.* The fraction of the maximum available torque at an engine speed.

*Rated horsepower.* The nominal brake power output of a diesel engine as specified by the engine manufacturer with a specified production tolerance. For laboratory test purposes, the fuel pump calibration for the rated horsepower must be set between the nominal and the maximum fuel tolerance specification.

*Rated speed.* Speed at which the rated power is delivered, as specified by the engine manufacturer.

*Steady-state condition.* Diesel engine operating condition which is at a constant speed and load and at stabilized temperatures and pressures.

*Total oxides of nitrogen.* The sum total of the measured parts per millions (ppm) of nitric oxide (NO) plus the measured ppm of nitrogen dioxide (NO2).
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.1107-6 Capacity of fire suppression devices; location and direction of nozzles. ( a ) Each fire suppression device shall be: ( 1 ) Adequate in size and capacity to extinguish potential fires in or on the equipment protected; and
( 2 ) Suitable for the atmospheric conditions surrounding the equipment protected (e.g., air velocity, type, and proximity of adjacent combustible material); and
( 3 ) Rugged enough to withstand rough usage and vibration when installed on mining equipment.
( b ) The extinguishant-discharge nozzles of each fire suppression device shall, where practicable, be located so as to take advantage of mine ventilation air currents. The fire suppression device may be of the internal injection, inundating, or combination type. Where fire control is achieved by internal injection, or combination of internal injection and inundation, hazardous locations shall be enclosed to minimize runoff and overshoot of the extinguishing agent and the extinguishing agent shall be directed onto: ( 1 ) Cable reel compartments and electrical cables on the equipment which are subject to flexing or to external damage; and
( 2 ) All hydraulic components on the equipment which are exposed directly to or located in the immediate vicinity of electrical cables which are subject to flexing or to damage.
[37 FR 15302, July 29, 1972]
DISMISS and Opinion F iled September 15, 2020 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-01511-CV IN RE CEDRIC WHITEHURST On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-19-18502 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Schenck, Osborne, and Partida-Kipness Opinion by Justice Osborne We questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal from an associa te judge’s order denying a petition to change name as it appeared prematur ely filed. See T EX
. F AM

. C ODE A NN
. § 45.103. Under the Texas Family Code, an associate judge’s or der becomes the order of the referri ng court and triggers the appel late deadlines if it is an agreed order, a default order, or a final order in a case in which the parties, prior to the start of the hearing cond ucted by the associate judge, w aived in writing the right to a de novo hearing before the referring court. See id. §§ 201.007(a)(16),(c); 201.016(c). Otherwise, the appe llate deadlines are triggered o nly upon the signing of the order by the referring court. See id. § 201.016(b).–2– Because the appealed order is not an agreed or default order an d nothing in the record reflected the right t o a de novo hearing was waived, in fact the record reflected the referring court held a de novo hearing but did no t sign the associate judge’s order, we directed appellant to file a letter brief add ressing our concern. More than ten days have passed, however, and appellant has not complied. We cautioned appellant, when we d irected him to file a letter b rief, that failure to comply could result in dismissal of the appeal without furth er notice. Accordingly, as nothing before t he Court reflects the appellate deadlines have been triggered, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(a).

191511F.P05 /Leslie Osborne/ LESLIE OSBORNE JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

IN RE CEDRIC WHITEHURST
No. 05-19-01511-CV On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-19-18502. Opinion delivered by Justice Osborne, Justices Schenck and Partida-Kipness participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.
Judgment entered September 15, 2020
#### § 57.16006 Protection of gas cylinder valves.

Valves on compressed gas cylinders shall be protected by covers when being transported or stored, and by a safe location when the cylinders are in use.
Date September 1 0, 1997 Ref. 

Copies to 

Subject SADT of Trigonox 425-C75 

1. Introduction 

The thermal stability of organic peroxides is g[v!3n by the so-called Self Accerelating 

Decomposition Temperature (SADT). This temperature is defined as the lowest ambient 

temperature at which self-.accerelating decomposition (runaway) occurs with the peroxide in 

the packaging as used for transport. The SADT is use~ for safe transport, storage and 

handli.ng purposes. 

2. Determinatibn of the SADT 

The SADT of Trigonox 425-C75 was determined in accordance with the United Nations, 

Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods, Manual of Tests and Criteria, 

Test H4, ST/SG/AC.10/11/Rev.2. 

3. Sample description 

Composition 

Molecular formula 

Active Oxygen content 

Physical form 

Density 

Batch number 

4. Testresults 

Method: Heat Accumulation Storage Test, UN test 1-1 .4 

Conditions: 0.5 I cylindrical Dewar vess.el 

Half-life time· of cooling 7Vz hours (with 400 rill Dimethylphtalate) 

Intake 350 g (400 ml) 

• 

_____ -~--QQ.~ryjltion§.;_~elf ac~!._~lafJ!I de e.~ositi£1!.."!!. 20 g ___ ..,.,. _____ ~----'---··~-------·-···--· -~ Induction period > 39 hours . 

No self accerelating decomposition at 15 oc 

Max. temp rise 2.3 oc 

(See appendix 1) 
temperature of 10 oc and an C!;ontrol temperature f croc;-for transport . . ~ ·--~---···--- ·· ~ ~ ... '., ............ ., .. __ _. .. . 

... ,j,...- ~ 

\ 

I 

.......... ,,.,,,.,,_.,, ... ) 

• ' J-L,, ~~-~-~-

_,.:.._ ....... ",..., ~ 

·-•-· .... -.---.. -·--·--...--......--....,.....,. _ _,., ~, ....... -~ ·-v~------------·---..··--·-:------......-..- ·•...-•---.. ._.,-........ --... - ... -..-~-·-•• -,..._,..; _____ .... 

I 

.. ..f. 
0 i 

0 { - CX) 0 

N 

"0 l 

c: ( 

ctl ' 

1.() ( 

........ 

..... 

ctl 

1.() 

(.) 

I 

1.() 

N -<D -qX 

f 0 c 

0 I 

.!2' ..-- i , 

I... (]J \ 1- .... l ..__:::> O.Q> ..,.LL 

(/) ( Q) .... Q) 0> ro 

..... - v 

0 I 

-

(/) 

c: 

0 

:;:::; \ . ro 

:::l 

E 

:::l \ (.) (..) ro 

.... 

ro 

<1) 

I -N 

t 

l 

. ··-· . ····-· "·-·· ·······-·--- .. ---- ·····-· ·-:-----'" ---··-----)···--·--- ··------ -----··· --·-· 

_L ______ --------·- o 

0 

C'0 

0 

N 

0 0 0 

..-

' 

(]J 

..... 

::l 

-

ro ..... 

(J) 

Q. 

E 

(J) 

-

c (]J 

> 

0 

Ul 

>- ro 

"0 (]J 

II ..... 

. ::l 

I ro (]J ..... 

E <V- 0... :;:; E 

(J) 

..... 

(]J 

Q. 

E 

ro 

en
§ 735.2 Objectives. The objectives of assistance under this part are— ( a ) To assist the States in meeting the costs of administering reclamation and enforcement programs consistent with the Act;
( b ) To encourage the States to build strong reclamation and enforcement programs; and
( c ) To encourage the States to assume jurisdiction over the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Frank D. Jones.

Motion for leave to prosecute appeal as a poor person denied. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Noonan, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.1403-9 Criteria—Shelter holes. ( a ) Shelter holes should be provided on track haulage roads at intervals of not more than 105 feet unless otherwise approved by the Coal Mine Safety District Manager(s).
( b ) Shelter holes should be readily accessible and should be at least 5 feet in depth, not more than 4 feet in width (except crosscuts used as shelter holes) and at least the height of the coal seam where the coal seam is less than 6 feet high and at least 6 feet in height where the coal seam is 6 feet or more in height.
( c ) Shelter holes should be kept free of refuse and other obstructions. Crosscuts used as shelter holes should be kept free of refuse or other materials to a depth of at least 15 feet.
( d ) Shelter holes should be provided at all manually operated doors and at switch throws except: ( 1 ) At room switches, or
( 2 ) at switches where more than 6 feet of side clearance is provided. The Coal Mine Safety District Manager(s) may permit exemption of this requirement if such shelter holes create a hazardous roof condition.
( e ) At each underground slope landing where men pass and cars are handled, a shelter hole at least 10 feet in depth, 4 feet in width, and 6 feet in height should be provided.
#### § 590.2 Who may appeal?

If you are adversely affected by a BOEM official's final decision or order issued under chapter V of this title, you may appeal that decision or order to the Interior Board of Land Appeals (IBLA). Your appeal must conform with the procedures found in this subpart and 43 CFR part 4, subpart E. A request for reconsideration of a BOEM decision concerning a lease bid, authorized in § 556.517(b), § 581.21(a)(2), or § 585.118(c)(1) of this chapter, is not subject to the procedures found in this part.

[89 FR 31598, Apr. 24, 2024]