Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 245 / Monday, December 21, 2020 / Notices 83079 

emission allowance allocations, a 

portion of each state’s emissions budget 

for the program for each control period 

is reserved in a NUSA (and in an 

additional Indian country NUSA in the 

case of states with Indian country 

within their borders) for allocation to 

certain units that would not otherwise 

receive allowance allocations. The 

procedures for identifying the eligible 

units for each control period and for 

allocating allowances from the NUSAs 

and Indian country NUSAs to these 

units are set forth in the CSAPR trading 

program regulations at 40 CFR 97.411(b) 

and 97.412 (NOX Annual), 97.511(b) and 

97.512 (NOX Ozone Season Group 1), 

97.611(b) and 97.612 (SO2 Group 1), 

97.711(b) and 97.712 (SO2 Group 2), and 

97.811(b) and 97.812 (NOX Ozone 

Season Group 2). Each NUSA allowance 

allocation process involves up to two 

rounds of allocations to eligible units, 

termed ‘‘new’’ units, followed by the 

allocation to ‘‘existing’’ units of any 

allowances not allocated to new units. 

This notice concerns EPA’s 

preliminary identification of units 

eligible to receive allowances in the 

second round of NUSA allocations for 

the 2020 control periods. The units 

eligible for second-round allocations for 

a given control period are CSAPRaffected units that commenced 

commercial operation between January 

1 of the year before that control period 

and November 30 of the year of that 

control period. In the case of the 2020 

control periods, an eligible unit 

therefore must have commenced 

commercial operation between January 

1, 2019 and November 30, 2020 

(inclusive). Generally, where a unit is 

eligible to receive a second-round 

NUSA allocation under a given CSAPR 

trading program for a given control 

period, the unit’s maximum potential 

second-round allocation equals the 

positive difference (if any) between the 

unit’s emissions during the control 

period as reported under 40 CFR part 75 

and any first-round NUSA allocation the 

unit received. If the total of such 

maximum potential allocations to all 

eligible units would exceed the total 

allowances remaining in the NUSA, the 

allocations are reduced on a pro-rata 

basis. EPA notes that under 40 CFR 

97.406(c)(3), 97.506(c)(3), 97.606(c)(3), 

97.706(c)(3), and 97.806(c)(3), a unit’s 

emissions occurring before its monitor 

certification deadline are not considered 

to have occurred during a control period 

and consequently are not included in 

the emission amounts used to determine 

NUSA allocations. 

The preliminary lists of eligible units 

are set forth in Excel spreadsheets titled 

‘‘CSAPR_NUSA_2020_NOx_Annual_

2nd_Round_Prelim_Data,’’ ‘‘CSAPR_

NUSA_2020_NOx_Ozone_Season_2nd_

Round_Prelim_Data,’’ and ‘‘CSAPR_

NUSA_2020_SO2_2nd_Round_Prelim_

Data’’ available on EPA’s website at 

https://www.epa.gov/csapr/csaprcompliance-year-2020-nusa-nodas. Each 

spreadsheet contains a separate 

worksheet for each state covered by that 

program showing each unit 

preliminarily identified as eligible for a 

second-round NUSA allocation. Each 

state worksheet also contains a 

summary showing (1) the quantity of 

allowances initially available in that 

state’s 2020 NUSA, (2) the sum of the 

2020 NUSA allowance allocations that 

were made in the first round to new 

units in that state, if any, and (3) the 

quantity of allowances in the 2020 

NUSA available for second-round 

allocations to new units (or ultimately 

for allocations to existing units), if any. 

Objections should be strictly limited 

to whether EPA has correctly identified 

the units eligible for second-round 2020 

NUSA allocations according to the 

criteria established in the regulations 

and should be emailed to the address 

identified in ADDRESSES. Objections 

must include: (1) Precise identification 

of the specific data the commenter 

believes are inaccurate, (2) new 

proposed data upon which the 

commenter believes EPA should rely 

instead, and (3) the reasons why EPA 

should rely on the commenter’s 

proposed data and not the data 

referenced in this notice. 

EPA notes that an allocation or lack 

of allocation of allowances to a given 

unit does not constitute a determination 

that CSAPR does or does not apply to 

the unit. EPA also notes that under 40 

CFR 97.411(c), 97.511(c), 97.611(c), 

97.711(c), and 97.811(c), allocations are 

subject to potential correction if a unit 

to which NUSA allowances have been 

allocated for a given control period is 

not actually an affected unit as of the 

start of that control period. 

(Authority: 40 CFR 97.411(b), 97.511(b), 

97.611(b), 97.711(b), and 97.811(b).) 

Dated: December 2, 2020. 

Reid P. Harvey, 

Director, Clean Air Markets Division, Office 

of Atmospheric Programs, Office of Air and 

Radiation. 

[FR Doc. 2020–28115 Filed 12–18–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

[OMB 3060–0716, 3060–0991 and 3060– 

1248; FRS 17318] 

Information Collections Being 

Submitted for Review and Approval to 

Office of Management and Budget 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort 

to reduce paperwork burdens, as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) of 1995, the Federal 

Communications Commission (FCC or 

the Commission) invites the general 

public and other Federal Agencies to 

take this opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection. 

Pursuant to the Small Business 

Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, the FCC 

seeks specific comment on how it can 

further reduce the information 

collection burden for small business 

concerns with fewer than 25 employees. 

DATES: Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be 

submitted on or before January 20, 2021. 

ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to 

www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. 

Find this particular information 

collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under 

30-day Review—Open for Public 

Comments’’ or by using the search 

function. Your comment must be 

submitted into www.reginfo.gov per the 

above instructions for it to be 

considered. In addition to submitting in 

www.reginfo.gov also send a copy of 

your comment on the proposed 

information collection to Cathy 

Williams, FCC, via email to PRA@

fcc.gov and to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov. 

Include in the comments the OMB 

control number as shown in the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION below. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information or copies of the 

information collection, contact Cathy 

Williams at (202) 418–2918. To view a 

copy of this information collection 

request (ICR) submitted to OMB: (1) Go 

to the web page http://www.reginfo.gov/ 

public/do/PRAMain, (2) look for the 

section of the web page called 

‘‘Currently Under Review,’’ (3) click on 

the downward-pointing arrow in the 

‘‘Select Agency’’ box below the 

‘‘Currently Under Review’’ heading, (4) 

select ‘‘Federal Communications 

Commission’’ from the list of agencies 

presented in the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box, 

(5) click the ‘‘Submit’’ button to the 

83080 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 245 / Monday, December 21, 2020 / Notices 

right of the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box, (6) 

when the list of FCC ICRs currently 

under review appears, look for the Title 

of this ICR and then click on the ICR 

Reference Number. A copy of the FCC 

submission to OMB will be displayed. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission may not conduct or 

sponsor a collection of information 

unless it displays a currently valid 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) control number. No person shall 

be subject to any penalty for failing to 

comply with a collection of information 

subject to the PRA that does not display 

a valid OMB control number. 

As part of its continuing effort to 

reduce paperwork burdens, as required 

by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) 

of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), the FCC 

invited the general public and other 

Federal Agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection. 

Comments are requested concerning: (a) 

Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimates; (c) ways to enhance 

the quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; and (d) ways to 

minimize the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. Pursuant to the 

Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 

2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(4), the FCC seeks specific 

comment on how it might ‘‘further 

reduce the information collection 

burden for small business concerns with 

fewer than 25 employees.’’ 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0716. 

Title: Sections 73.88, 73.318 and 

73.685, Blanketing Interference. 

Form Number: N/A. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities; and Not-for-profit 

institutions. 

Number of Respondents and 

Responses: 21,000 respondents; 21,000 

responses. 

Estimated Time per Response: 1 to 2 

hours. 

Frequency of Response: Third party 

disclosure requirement. 

Total Annual Burden: 41,000 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: None. 

Obligation To Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. The statutory 

authority for this collection of 

information is contained in Section 

154(i) of the Communications Act of 

1934, as amended. 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

There is no need for confidentiality with 

this collection of information. 

Privacy Impact Assessment(s): No 

impact(s). 

Needs and Uses: The information 

collection requirements approved under 

this collection are contained under the 

following rule sections: 

47 CFR 73.88 states that the licensee 

of each broadcast station is required to 

satisfy all reasonable complaints of 

blanketing interference within the 1V/m 

contour. 

47 CFR 73.318(b) states that after 

January 1, 1985, permittees or licensees 

who either (1) commence program tests, 

(2) replace the antennas, or (3) request 

facilities modifications and are issued a 

new construction permit must satisfy all 

complaints of blanketing interference 

which are received by the station during 

a one year period. 

47 CFR 73.318(c) states that a 

permittee collocating with one or more 

existing stations and beginning program 

tests on or after January 1, 1985, must 

assume full financial responsibility for 

remedying new complaints of 

blanketing interference for a period of 

one year. 

Under 47 CFR 73.88, and 73.685(d), 

the license is financially responsible for 

resolving complaints of interference 

within one year of program test 

authority when certain conditions are 

met. After the first year, a license is only 

required to provide technical assistance 

to determine the cause of interference. 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0991. 

Title: AM Measurement Data. 

Form Number: N/A. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities. 

Number of Respondents and 

Responses: 1,800 respondents; 3,135 

responses. 

Estimated Hours per Response: 0.50– 

25 hours. 

Frequency of Response: 

Recordkeeping requirement, Third party 

disclosure requirement, On occasion 

reporting requirement. 

Total Annual Burden: 20,200 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: $1,131,500. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. The statutory 

authority for this collection of 

information is contained in Sections 

151, 152, 154(i), 303, and 307 of the 

Communications Act of 1934, as 

amended. 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

There is no need for confidentiality 

treatment with this collection of 

information. 

Privacy Impact Assessment: No 

impact(s). 

Needs and Uses: In order to control 

interference between stations and assure 

adequate community coverage, AM 

stations must conduct various 

engineering measurements to 

demonstrate that the antenna system 

operates as authorized. The data is used 

by station engineers to correct the 

operating parameters of the antenna. 

The data is also used by FCC staff in 

field investigations to ensure that 

stations are in compliance with the 

technical requirements of the 

Commission’s various rules. 

OMB Control Number: 3060–1248. 

Title: Transition from TTY to RealTime Text Technology, CG Docket No. 

16–145 and GN Docket No. 15–178. 

Form Number: N/A. 

Type of Review: Extension and update 

of collection. 

Respondents: Businesses or other forprofit entities. 

Number of Respondents and 

Responses: 967 respondents; 5,235 

responses. 

Estimated Time per Response: 0.2 

hours (12 minutes) to 60 hours. 

Frequency of Response: Annual, 

ongoing, and semiannual reporting 

requirements; recordkeeping 

requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefit. The statutory 

authority can be found at sections 4(i), 

225, 255, 301, 303(r), 316, 403, 715, and 

716 of the Communications Act of 1934, 

as amended, and section 106 of the 

Twenty-First Century Communications 

and Video Accessibility Act of 2010, 47 

U.S.C. 154(i), 225, 255, 301, 303(r), 316, 

403, 615c, 616, 617; Public Law 111– 

260, 106, 124 Stat. 2751, 2763 (2010). 

Total Annual Burden: 114,212 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: No cost. 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

There is no need for confidentiality with 

this collection of information. 

Privacy Impact Assessment: This 

information collection does not affect 

individuals or households; therefore, 

the Privacy Act is not impacted. 

Needs and Uses: Text telephone 

(TTY) technology provides the primary 

means for people with disabilities to 

send and receive text communications 

over the public switched telephone 

network (PSTN). Changes to 

communications networks, particularly 

ongoing technology transitions from 

circuit switched to IP-based networks 

and from copper to wireless and fiber 

infrastructure, have affected the quality 

and utility of TTY technology, 

prompting discussions on transitioning 

to an alternative advanced 

communications technology for text 

Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 245 / Monday, December 21, 2020 / Notices 83081 

communications. Accordingly, on 

December 16, 2016, the Commission 

released Transition from TTY to RealTime Text Technology, Report and 

Order, document FCC 16–169, 82 FR 

7699, January 23, 2017, amending its 

rules that govern the obligations of 

wireless service providers and 

manufacturers to support TTY 

technology to permit such providers and 

manufacturers to provide support for 

real-time text (RTT) over wireless IPbased networks to facilitate an effective 

and seamless transition to RTT in lieu 

of continuing to support TTY 

technology. In document FCC 16–169, 

the Commission adopted measures 

requiring the following: 

(a) Each wireless provider and 

manufacturer that voluntarily 

transitions from TTY technology to RTT 

over wireless IP-based networks and 

services is encouraged to develop 

consumer and education efforts that 

include (1) the development and 

dissemination of educational materials 

that contain information pertinent to the 

nature, purpose, and timelines of the 

RTT transition; (2) internet postings, in 

an accessible format, of information 

about the TTY to RTT transition on the 

websites of covered entities; (3) the 

creation of a telephone hotline and an 

online interactive and accessible service 

that can answer consumer questions 

about RTT; and (4) appropriate training 

of staff to effectively respond to 

consumer questions. All consumer 

outreach and education should be 

provided in accessible formats 

including, but not limited to, large print, 

Braille, videos in American Sign 

Language and that are captioned and 

video described, emails to consumers 

who have opted to receive notices in 

this manner, and printed materials. 

Service providers and manufacturers are 

also encouraged to coordinate with 

consumer, public safety, and industry 

stakeholders to develop and distribute 

education and outreach materials. The 

information will inform consumers of 

alternative accessible technology 

available to replace TTY technology that 

may no longer be available to the 

consumer through their provider or on 

their device. 

(b) Each wireless provider that 

requested or will request and receive a 

waiver of the requirement to support 

TTY technology over wireless IP-based 

networks and services must apprise its 

customers, through effective and 

accessible channels of communication, 

that (1) until TTY is sunset, TTY 

technology will not be supported for 

calls to 911 services over IP-based 

wireless services, and (2) there are 

alternative PSTN-based and IP-based 

accessibility solutions for people with 

disabilities to reach 911 services. These 

notices must be developed in 

coordination with public safety 

answering points (PSAPs) and national 

consumer organizations, and include a 

listing of text-based alternatives to 911, 

including, but not limited to, TTY 

capability over the PSTN, various forms 

of PSTN-based and IP-based TRS, and 

text-to-911 (where available). The 

notices will inform consumers on the 

loss of the use of TTY for completing 

911 calls over the provider’s network 

and alert them to alternatives service for 

which TTY may be used. 

(c) Once every six months, each 

wireless provider that requests and 

receives a waiver of the requirement to 

support TTY technology must file a 

report with the Commission and inform 

its customers regarding its progress 

toward and the status of the availability 

of new IP-based accessibility solutions. 

Such reports must include (1) 

information on the interoperability of 

the provider’s selected accessibility 

solution with the technologies deployed 

or to be deployed by other carriers and 

service providers, (2) the backward 

compatibility of such solution with 

TTYs, (3) a showing of the provider’s 

efforts to ensure delivery of 911 calls to 

the appropriate PSAP, (4) a description 

of any obstacles incurred towards 

achieving interoperability and steps 

taken to overcome such obstacles, and 

(5) an estimated timetable for the 

deployment of accessibility solutions. 

The information will inform consumers 

of the progress towards the availability 

of alternative accessible means to 

replace TTY, and the Commission will 

be able to evaluate the reports to 

determine if any changes to the waivers 

are warranted or of any impediments to 

progress that it may be in a position to 

resolve. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene Dortch, 

Secretary, Office of the Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2020–28022 Filed 12–18–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

[OMB 3060–0848, FRS 17302] 

Information Collection Being 

Submitted for Review and Approval to 

Office of Management and Budget 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort 

to reduce paperwork burdens, as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) of 1995, the Federal 

Communications Commission (FCC or 

the Commission) invites the general 

public and other Federal Agencies to 

take this opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection. 

Pursuant to the Small Business 

Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, the FCC 

seeks specific comment on how it might 

‘‘further reduce the information 

collection burden for small business 

concerns with fewer than 25 

employees.’’ 

The Commission may not conduct or 

sponsor a collection of information 

unless it displays a currently valid 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) control number. No person shall 

be subject to any penalty for failing to 

comply with a collection of information 

subject to the PRA that does not display 

a valid OMB control number. 

DATES: Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be 

submitted on or before January 20, 2021. 

ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to 

www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. 

Find this particular information 

collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under 

30-day Review—Open for Public 

Comments’’ or by using the search 

function. Your comment must be 

submitted into www.reginfo.gov per the 

above instructions for it to be 

considered. In addition to submitting in 

www.reginfo.gov also send a copy of 

your comment on the proposed 

information collection to Nicole Ongele, 

FCC, via email to PRA@fcc.gov and to 

Nicole.Ongele@fcc.gov. Include in the 

comments the OMB control number as 

shown in the SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION below. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information or copies of the 

information collection, contact Nicole 

Ongele at (202) 418–2991. To view a 

copy of this information collection 

request (ICR) submitted to OMB: (1) Go 

to the web page http://www.reginfo.gov/ 

public/do/PRAMain, (2) look for the 

section of the web page called 

‘‘Currently Under Review,’’ (3) click on 

the downward-pointing arrow in the 

‘‘Select Agency’’ box below the 

‘‘Currently Under Review’’ heading, (4) 

select ‘‘Federal Communications 

Commission’’ from the list of agencies 

presented in the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box, 

(5) click the ‘‘Submit’’ button to the 

right of the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box, (6) 

when the list of FCC ICRs currently 

under review appears, look for the Title 

of this ICR and then click on the ICR