alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsRotor Vortex Filaments: Living on the Slipstream's EdgeThe purpose of this paper is to gain a better understanding of rotor wake evolution in hover and axial flow by deriving an analytical solution for the time dependent behavior of vortex filament circulation and core size. This solution is applicable only for vortex filaments in the rotor far-wake. A primarily inviscid vortex/shear layer interaction (where the slipstream boundary is modeled as a shear layer) has been identified in this analytical treatment. This vortex/shear layer interaction results in decreasing, vortex filament circulation and core size with time. The inviscid vortex/shear layer interaction is shown, in a first-order treatment, to be of greater magnitude than viscous diffusion effects. The rate of contraction, and ultimate collapse, of the vortex filament core is found to be directly proportional to the rotor inflow velocity. This new insight into vortex filament decay promises to help reconcile several disparate observations made in the literature and will, hopefully, promote new advances in theoretical modeling of rotor wakes.Document ID19970011043Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsYoung, Larry A.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1997Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-110431A-975569NAS 1.15:110431Accession Number97N16092Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-59-36Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970011043.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>

This schedule contains summary financial  information  extracted from Springhill
Lake Investors  Limited  Partnership 1999 Fourth Quarter 10-KSB and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such 10-KSB filing.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                               0000763399
<NAME>                            SPRINGHILL LAKE INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000


<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                     2,343
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                              1,573
<ALLOWANCES>                                (236)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                   107,987
<DEPRECIATION>                           (53,589)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            61,613
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                   55,402
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              61,613
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          26,159
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          24,432
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         5,336
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                               1,056
<EPS-BASIC>                             1,545.45 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>

<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.

</FN>


</TABLE>
§ 57.4462 Storage of combustible liquids underground. The requirements of this standard apply to underground areas only. ( a ) Combustible liquids, including oil or grease, shall be stored in non-glass containers or storage tanks. The containers or storage tanks shall be— ( 1 ) Capable of withstanding working pressures and stresses and compatible with the type of liquid stored;
( 2 ) Maintained in a manner that prevents leakage;
( 3 ) Located in areas free of combustible materials or in areas where any exposed combustible materials are coated with one inch of shotcrete, one-half inch of gunite, or other noncombustible material with equivalent fire protection characteristics; and
( 4 ) Separated from explosives or blasting agents, shaft stations, and ignition sources including electric equipment that could create sufficient heat or sparks to pose a fire hazard. Separation shall be sufficient to prevent the occurrence or minimize the spread of fire.
( b ) Storage tanks shall be vented or otherwise constructed to prevent development of pressure or vacuum as a result of filling, emptying, or atmospheric temperature changes. Vents for storage of Class II or IIIA liquids shall be isolated or separated from ignition sources.
( c ) At permanent storage areas for combustible liquids, means shall be provided for confinement or removal of the contents of the largest storage tank in the event of tank rupture.
( d ) All piping, valves, and fittings shall be: ( 1 ) Capable of withstanding working pressures and stresses;
( 2 ) Compatible with the type of liquid stored; and
( 3 ) Maintained in a manner which prevents leakage.
#### NELSON, Appellant, v. CROSSMAN, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 6, 1903.)

Action by Joseph A. Nelson against Lizzie Crossman, as administratrix. J. J. Fitzgerald, for appellant. H. A. Heydt, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
#### § 57.14113 Inclined conveyors: backstops or brakes.

Backstops or brakes shall be installed on drive units of inclined conveyors to prevent the conveyors from running in reverse, creating a hazard to persons.
<PAGE>   1
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

I, Richard C. Hirtle, the Vice President, Treasurer & Chief Financial Officer of
North American Security Life Insurance Company (the "Company"), do hereby
constitute and appoint John D. Richardson, John D. DesPrez III, James D.
Gallagher and John G. Vrysen, or any one of them, my true and lawful attorneys
to execute for me and in my name, in the capacities indicated below, reports and
other filings to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (or any
other regulatory entity) pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
"1934 Act") including, without limitation, Form 10-Ks and Forms 10-Qs and
further to do any and all acts and things and to execute any and all reports,
documents and instruments for me and in my name, in the capacities indicated
below, which said attorneys may deem necessary or advisable to enable the
Company to comply with the 1934 Act and any rules, regulations, and requirements
thereunder and I do hereby ratify and confirm all that said attorneys, or any
one of them, shall do or cause to be done by virtue of this power of attorney.

Executed this  1st  day of May, 1997.
               ---         ---

/s/ RICHARD C. HIRTLE
-----------------------------
Richard C. Hirtle
Vice President, Treasurer & Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.4

                       SECOND AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT

         This Second Amendment to Loan Agreement is made as of October 1, 2002,
by and between DIVERSICARE ASSISTED LIVING SERVICES NC II, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company (together with its successors and assigns, the
"Borrower"), and GMAC COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION, a California corporation
(together with its successors and assigns, the "Lender").

                                    RECITALS:

         A.       Borrower and the Lender entered that certain Loan Agreement
dated June 4, 1999, as amended by that certain First Amendment to Loan Agreement
dated as of July 1, 2002 (the "Agreement"). Unless otherwise defined in this
Second Amendment, capitalized terms shall have the meaning given to them in the
Agreement.

         B.       The Borrower and the Lender desire to amend the Agreement and
have agreed to execute this Second Amendment to evidence such modification.

                                    AGREEMENT

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above Recitals, the Borrower
and the Lender hereby amend the Agreement as follows:

         Paragraph 1.1, "Maturity Date" is hereby amended by changing the date
"September 28, 2002" to "December 1, 2002".

         Except as expressly amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect in accordance with its terms.

<PAGE>

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrower and the Lender have caused this Second
Amendment to be properly executed by their respective duly authorized officers
as of the date first above written.

                                     DIVERSICARE ASSISTED LIVING SERVICES
                                     NC II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
                                     company

                                     By: Diversicare Assisted Living Services
                                     NC, LLC
                                     Its: Sole Member

                                           By: /S/ William R. Council, III
                                              ----------------------------------
                                           Name: William R. Council, III
                                           Title: Executive Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer

                                     GMAC COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE
                                     CORPORATION

                                     By:  /S/ Laura McDonald
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                     Its:
                                         ---------------------------------------

                                       2
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Photogen Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2001 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brooks Boveroux, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/BROOKS BOVEROUXBrooks Boveroux
Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2002 | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 

---

QuickLinks
#### In the Matter of the Claim of John Filipowicz, Respondent, v. De Laval Separator Company et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal by employer and carrier from an award for total disability as a result of silicosis. It is conceded that claimant has silicosis and is permanently and totally disabled. Appellants claim that there is no proof of injurious exposure in claimant’s last employment by the employer. Claimant worked as a molder in the foundry of this same employer for about 27 years until January, 1952, when the foundry closed down. He then went to work as a molder at another foundry for another employer until October, 1953, when this foundry also closed down. He then went back to work for this employer as a trucker in the rubber plant from August, 1954 to September 17, 1958, when he was no longer able to work and became totally disabled. Appellants also argue that claimant had silicosis in 1955, and seem to argue that because of his long exposure as a foundry worker and evidence of silicosis prior to his last employment by this employer, an award against this employer is improper. Of course his long prior exposure to silica dust, or even presence of silicosis medically, does not prevent an award against the employer herein, the last employer. *(Matter of Dunleavy*v. *Walsh, Connelly, Senior é Palmer,*309 N. Y. 8; *Matter of Edwards*v. *Catapano <£ Grow Constr. Co.,*15 A D 2d 843.) Hence the only question is whether there was harmful exposure in claimant’s last employment by the appellant employer. As a trucker in the rubber plant claimant operated a fork lift truck throughout the entire plant transporting sheets of rubber and other materials to various locations. Claimant testified that he applied tale to the sheets of rubber to keep them from sticking. He applied it with his hands and got talc all over his clothes and in his hair. Other employees forced tale through rubber tubing with compressed air. It appears that the floor was covered with talc, and two employees were engaged continuously to vacuum the floor to clean up the talc as fast as possible. From a chemical analysis submitted it appears that powdered talc is a “finely powdered hydrous magnesium silicate containing 47.70% silica with small percentages of other materials”. Although this is not free silica, there is adequate evidence of causal relation between claimant’s exposure at the rubber plant and his condition when he finally became disabled. The board could *666find on this record that claimant was exposed to an injurious dust hazard during his last employment with this employer, and became disabled in 1958. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Coon, J. P., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Occupational-Disease Legislation in the United States, 1936

              																	Sharkey, Charles F., 1894-					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Occupational-Disease Legislation in the United States, 1936 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 625*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. G.P.O., 										1937,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4143,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Centerpoint Houston Electric, LLC v. 5433 Westheimer, LP; 5433 Westheimer, GP LLC and Songy 5433 Westheimer GP LLC

Appellate case number: 01

- 15

- 00335

- CV

Trial court case number: 2012

- 75635

Trial court: 269th District Court of Harris County

The clerk’s record was due May 11, 2015. On the same date, Centerpoint filed a motion to extend time to file the record, requesting 30 days to file the record. This Court granted the motion and extended the deadline to June 11, 2015. Although the reporter’s record was filed, the
District Clerk advised this court on June 15, 2015, that the clerk’s record had been prepared, but

that payment arrangements had not been made. O n October 8, 2015, this Court issued a notice threatening dismissal for nonpayment for the clerk’s record unless Centerpoint filed written evidence showing payment or payment arrangements had been made by October 23, 2015. No response was filed. On Novem ber 18, 2015, appellees filed a motion to dismiss, based on the nonpayment for the clerk’s record. On December 1, 2015, Centerpoint finally respond ed

, requesting another 30 days for the clerk’s record to be filed and not attaching written proof of

payment

. We grant Centerpoint’s motion and grant an extension until December 11, 2015, to file the clerk’s record. No further extensions will be granted. Given the existing delay s caused by not filing the clerk’s record for more than 6 months

, any further exten sion motions in this case for the record or the briefs will be denied absent exceptionally compelling reasons

.
It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: December 3, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                       3,336,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,811,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   273,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,479,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,464,000
<PP&E>                                      20,541,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,429,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,647,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,672,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,949,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,647,000
<SALES>                                      7,862,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,862,000
<CGS>                                        3,577,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,577,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,704,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (361,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (361,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Stearns Motors, Inc., Petitioner, v Department *854of Motor Vehicles of the State of New York, Respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, *inter alia,*to review a determination of the respondent Department of Motor Vehicles, dated April 26, 1977, which, after a hearing, imposed a $200 penalty against the petitioner for violation of motor vehicle repair shop regulations. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed, on the merits, with costs. The determination was supported by substantial evidence. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
## A V

A TAR AIRLINES INe 0RPO RA TED 3227 Meade Ave., Suite 2B Las Vegas, NV 89102 Phone: (702) 253-1520 April 2, 2010
Vanessa R. Balgobin Air Carrier Fitness Division V.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE iaShington, DC 20590

1 Re: Family Airlines ~ncorporated Docket DOT-OS -2008-0029 Corporate Name Change fear Ms. Balgobin: Please be advised Appli ant Family Airlines, Incorporated, Docket DOT-OST-2008-00J29, 'as amended its Articlesof Incorporation on March 18, 2010 to change its corporate na~e to 

# tvatar Airlines, Inc. I . Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the foregoing matter.
Best regards,