alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official c aption containing a complete list of parties is on file and available 1 for inspection in the Office of the Clerk of the Court, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-1613

___________ Wendy E. Taylor, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. State of Alabama Bar Association; * et al., * [UNPUBLISHED] 1 Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: August 3, 1998 Filed: August 7, 1998

___________ Befo reMcMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________The Hon orable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge for the Eastern 2 District of Missouri. -2- PER CURIAM. W e ndy Taylor appeals from the district court & s dismissal without prejudice of 2 he r complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). After carefull y reviewing th e record, we affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons i t stated. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Directory of Trails        - Directory of Trails
        - 1. Tidelands Trail - Fremont
        - 2. LaRiviere Marsh Trail -Fremont
        - 3. Shoreline Trail & 4. No Name Trail - Fremont
        - 5. Newark Slough Trail - Fremont
        - 6. Warm Springs Trail - Fremont
        - 7. Coyote Creek Lagoon Trail - Fremont
        - 8. Alviso Slough Trail - Alviso
        - 9. Mallard Slough Trail - Alviso
        - 10. New Chicago Marsh Trail - Alviso
        - 11. Moffett Bay Trail - Sunnyvale
        - 12. Stevens Creek East Trail - Mountain View
        - 13. Faber-Laumeister Trail - East Palo Alto
        - 14. Ravenswood Trail - Menlo Park
        - 15. SF2 Trail - Menlo Park
        - 16. Bair Island Trail - Redwood City

## 6. Warm Springs Trail - Fremont

**Length**1.3 miles one way

**Amenities and Uses**Hiking and bicycling only. No pets.**Trail Surface**Flat, compacted gravel road.

**Highlights**This trail provides hikers with views of one of the last remaining vernal pools in South San Francisco Bay and the largest area of seasonal grasslands on the refuge. These vernal pools protect the endangered Contra Costa wallflower and vernal pool tadpole shrimp, and the federally-threatened California tiger salamander. Wildflower displays can be spectacular in spring. Burrowing owls, a Species of Special Concern, and the occasional peregrine falcon and golden eagle can sometimes be seen here in the winter. The trail ends at the brown metal gate.

**Directions to Trailhead**From HWY 880, exit at Fremont/Cushing Pkwy. Turn right onto Cushing Pkwy. Drive 0.5 miles until you see a blue metal gate on the left, immediately after the last building. There is no public parking nearby.

**Click on map to enlarge.**
### §20110. Effect on employee qualifications and collective bargaining

This chapter does not—

(1) authorize the Secretary of Transportation to prescribe regulations and issue orders related to qualifications of employees, except qualifications specifically related to safety; or

(2) prohibit the bargaining representatives of railroad carriers and their employees from making collective bargaining agreements under the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. 151 et seq.), including agreements related to qualifications of employees, that are not inconsistent with regulations prescribed and orders issued under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 868.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20110 | 45:431(a) (2d, last sentences). | Oct. 16, 1970, Pub. L. 91–458, §202(a) (2d, last sentences), 84 Stat. 971. |

Section

In clause (2), the words "railroad carriers" are substituted for "common carriers" for consistency in this part.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Railway Labor Act, referred to in par. (2), is act May 20, 1926, ch. 347, 44 Stat. 577, which is classified principally to chapter 8 (§151 et seq.) of Title 45, Railroads. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 151 of Title 45 and Tables.
Summary of terms of compensation for Vikram Talwar



  
 Exhibit 10.1

  

			
	 ExlService
Holdings, Inc. (the “Corporation”)
 Term Sheet for Board Chairperson

Vikram Talwar

	Position	  	Chairperson of the Board of Directors of the Corporation (the
“Board”)
	Term	  	Begins April 1, 2011
	Annual Retainer	  	To be paid from April 1, 2011. Amount to be decided by the Board or Compensation
Committee.
	Meeting and Other Fees	  	Based on the Corporation’s standard terms for Board members.
	2010 Annual Bonus	  	Notwithstanding the Corporation’s bonus policy, amount to be paid at the same time
and subject to the same performance conditions as would have applied had Mr. Talwar not given notice of his intention to end his employment term on March 31, 2011.
	Vesting of Outstanding Equity Awards	  	Mr. Talwar’s outstanding and unvested equity awards shall continue to vest
according to their respective vesting schedules so long as Mr. Talwar continues to serve as Chairperson.
	Benefits After March 31, 2011	  	 Mr. Talwar shall be entitled to the
following benefits until the earlier of (1) March 31, 2013 or (2) Mr. Talwar’s departure from the Board:
  

•   Automobile and automobile-related expenses in India consistent with his existing
employment agreement.
  

•   Home office in India consistent with his existing employment agreement.

 
 •   Use of a full time
executive assistant in India.
  

•   Corporation to (a) pay on behalf of Mr. Talwar and his dependents the cost of continued
coverage under the Corporation’s group medical plan under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA) or (b) provide health benefits to Mr. Talwar and his dependents consistent with the benefits in effect on March 31,
2011.
  

•   Personal security for Mr. Talwar and his immediate family in India consistent with his
existing employment agreement.

	Taxes	  	Mr. Talwar will be responsible for all taxes applicable to the compensation and
benefits set forth herein.
§ 57.11053 Escape and evacuation plans. A specific escape and evacuation plan and revisions thereof suitable to the conditions and mining system of the mine and showing assigned responsibilities of all key personnel in the event of an emergency shall be developed by the operator and set out in written form. Within 45 calendar days after promulgation of this standard a copy of the plan and revisions thereof shall be available to the Secretary or his authorized representative. Also, copies of the plan and revisions thereof shall be posted at locations convenient to all persons on the surface and underground. Such a plan shall be updated as necessary and shall be reviewed jointly by the operator and the Secretary or his authorized representative at least once every six months from the date of the last review. The plan shall include: ( a ) Mine maps or diagrams showing directions of principal air flow, location of escape routes and locations of existing telephones, primary fans, primary fan controls, fire doors, ventilation doors, and refuge chambers. Appropriate portions of such maps or diagrams shall be posted at all shaft stations and in underground shops, lunchrooms, and elsewhere in working areas where persons congregate;
( b ) Procedures to show how the miners will be notified of emergency;
( c ) An escape plan for each working area in the mine to include instructions showing how each working area should be evacuated. Each such plan shall be posted at appropriate shaft stations and elsewhere in working areas where persons congregate;
( d ) A fire fighting plan;
( e ) Surface procedure to follow in an emergency, including the notification of proper authorities, preparing rescue equipment, and other equipment which may be used in rescue and recovery operations; and
( f ) A statement of the availability of emergency communication and transportation facilities, emergency power and ventilation and location of rescue personnel and equipment.
[50 FR 4082, Jan. 29, 1985, as amended at 60 FR 33722, June 29, 1995]
#### Kensington Capital Corp., Appellant, v Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, *LLP,*et al., Respondents.

[832 NYS2d 454]—

Appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 14, 2005. The appeal was on this Court’s calendar on September 13, 2006. By order to show cause dated February 7, 2007, the appellant or its attorney, Zoldan Associates, LLC, 1333 Race Street, Philadelphia, Pa. (Kenneth J. Zoldan of counsel), were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled action on the ground that Kenneth J. Zoldan is not a member of the New York State Bar and has not made a motion before this Court for leave to be admitted pro hac vice *(see*22 NYCRR 690.3 [a]), by filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on the other parties to the appeal on or before February 23, 2007. No papers were filed in response to the order to show cause.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs to the respondent. Rivera, J.P, Santucci, Krausman and Lifson, JJ., concur.
§ 556.306 What if a potentially oil- or gas-bearing area underlies both the OCS and lands subject to State jurisdiction? ( a ) Whenever the Director or the governor of a coastal State determines that a common potentially hydrocarbon-bearing area may underlie the Federal OCS and State submerged lands, the Director or the governor will notify the other party in writing of the determination.
( b ) Thereafter the Director will provide to the governor of the coastal State, subject to the confidentiality requirements in this chapter: ( 1 ) An identification of the areas proposed for leasing and a schedule for, leasing; and
( 2 ) An estimate of the oil and gas resources.
( c ) At the request of the governor of the coastal State, the Director will provide to such governor, subject to the confidentiality requirements in this chapter: ( 1 ) All geographical, geological, and ecological characteristics of the areas proposed for leasing; and
( 2 ) An identification of any field, geological structure, or trap that lies within 3 miles of the State's seaward boundary.
( d ) If BOEM intends to lease such blocks or tracts, the Director and the governor of the coastal State may enter into an agreement for the equitable disposition of the revenues from production of any common potentially hydrocarbon-bearing area, pursuant to OCSLA section 8(g)(3) (43 U.S.C. 1337(g)(3)). Any revenues received by the United States under such an agreement are subject to the requirements of OSCLA section 8(g)(2) (43 U.S.C. 1337(g)(2)).
( e ) If the Director and the governor do not enter into an agreement under paragraph (d) of this section within 90 days, BOEM may nevertheless proceed with the leasing of the tracts, in which case all revenues will be deposited in a separate account in the Treasury of the United States, pending disposition of 27% (twenty-seven percent) of the revenues to the relevant coastal state(s), pursuant to the requirements of OCSLA section 8(g)(2). (43 U.S.C. 1337(g)(2)).
#### Emerald Packing Corporation v. Hygrade Food Products Corporation.

Application denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente and Bergan, JJ.
Appeal No. 75-296.

#### Bertha D. Evans *et al. v.*Frank Liguori *et al.*

*Milton Stanzler, Howard I. Lipsey, Jordan Stanzler,*for plaintiffs.

*A. Lauriston Parks, David P. Whitman, Leonard A. Kiernan, Jr., Frank S. Cappuccio,*for defendants.

Petition for reargument is denied.
### §2405. Deputy Administrator for Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation

#### (a) In general

There is in the Administration a Deputy Administrator for Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation, who is appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.

#### (b) Duties

Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Administrator, the Deputy Administrator for Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation shall perform such duties and exercise such powers as the Administrator may prescribe, including the following:

(1) Preventing the spread of materials, technology, and expertise relating to weapons of mass destruction.

(2) Detecting the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction worldwide.

(3) Eliminating inventories of surplus fissile materials usable for nuclear weapons.

(4) Providing for international nuclear safety.

(Pub. L. 106–65, div. C, title XXXII, §3215, Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 959.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Mar. 1, 2000, see section 3299 of Pub. L. 106–65, set out as a note under section 2401 of this title.
§ 35.12 Changes after certification. If an applicant desires to change any specification or characteristic of a certified hydraulic fluid, he shall first obtain MSHA's approval of the change, pursuant to the following procedures: ( a ) ( 1 ) Application shall be made, as for an original certificate of approval, requesting that the existing certification be extended to cover the proposed change. The application shall be accompanied by specifications and related material as in the case of an original application.
( 2 ) Where the applicant for approval has used an independent laboratory under part 6 of this chapter to perform, in whole or in part, the necessary testing and evaluation for approval of changes to an approved product under this part, the applicant must provide to MSHA as part of the approval application: ( i ) Written evidence of the laboratory's independence and current recognition by a laboratory accrediting organization;
( ii ) Complete technical explanation of how the product complies with each requirement in the applicable MSHA product approval requirements;
( iii ) Identification of components or features of the product that are critical to the safety of the product; and
( iv ) All documentation, including drawings and specifications, as submitted to the independent laboratory by the applicant and as required by this part.
( b ) The application and related material(s) will be examined by MSHA to determine whether testing of the modified hydraulic fluid will be required. Testing will be necessary if there is a possibility that the modification may affect adversely the performance characteristics of the fluid. MSHA will inform the applicant in writing whether such testing is required.
( c ) If the proposed modification meets the requirements of this part, a formal extension of certification will be issued, accompanied by a list of new and corrected specifications to be added to those already on file, as the basis for the extension of certification.
[Sched, 30, 24 FR 10201, Dec. 17, 1959, as amended at 52 FR 17515, May 8, 1987; 68 FR 36422, June 17, 2003]
#### PENNELL, Appellant, v. FIDELITY CASUALTY CO. OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 1, 1905.)

Action by J. Frederick Pennell, as administrator, etc., against the Fidelity Casualty Company of New York. No opinion. Appeal dismissed under general rule 39.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles La Placa, Appellant.

Application by District Attorney to file and serve typewritten brief denied.
#### In the Matter of Rosanne Beman, Appellant, v Troy Kellogg, Respondent.

[832 NYS2d 837]—

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Anthony J. Paris, J.), entered February 15, 2006 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order denied the petition, granted respondent’s cross petition, awarded sole legal and primary physical custody of the parties’ child to respondent and visitation to petitioner.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Contrary to petitioner’s contention, Supreme Court properly determined following a hearing that the award of sole legal and primary physical custody of the parties’ child to respondent would be in the child’s best interests. That determination “is based on careful weighing of appropriate factors . . ., including the court’s firsthand assessment of the character and credibility of the parties” *(Matter of Pinkerton v Pensyl,*305 AD2d 1113, 1114 [2003]), and it has a sound and substantial

*1255basis in the record *(see Ulmer v Ulmer,*254 AD2d 541, 542 [1998]). Petitioner’s contention that the court abused its discretion in failing to reopen the hearing is not preserved for our review *(see Heuer v Heuer,*129 AD2d 961 [1987]). Present— Hurlbutt, J.P., Gorski, Smith, Fahey and Green, JJ.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Nomination of G. William Miller

              																	United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, 1970-					 and 	Ninety-Fifth Congress, 1977-1979. 						*Nomination of G. William Miller : Hearing Before the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, United States Senate, Ninety-Fifth Congress, Second Session, January 24, 1978*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										January 24, 1978,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/268,			accessed on September 11, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### Vera H. Layton, Respondent, v. George A. Layton, Appellant.

In a separation action, the defendant husband appeals: (1) from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens 'County, dated March 5,1963, as granted the plaintiff wife’s cross motion to renew her application for temporary alimony and counsel fee and, on renewal, awarded her temporary alimony of $100 a week and a counsel fee of $750 with leave to apply to the trial court for additional counsel fees; and (2) from so much of an order of said court, dated April 11, 1963, made upon the 'defendant’s motion for reargument, as adhered to the original determination. Order of April 11, 1963 modified: (a) by striking out its fifth, sixth and seventh ordering .paragraphs and so much of the last ordering paragraph as, upon reargument, adhered to the original decision; and (fa) by substituting therefor a provision that upon reargument the original motion for temporary alimony and counsel fee is referred to the trial court for deter-*727ruination. As so modified, order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order of March 5, 1963 is dismissed, without costs, as academic. That order was superseded by the later order of April 11, 1963 granting reargument. On the present record, it is our opinion that plaintiff did not sustain- her burden of showing that she needed an allowance for her support pending trial and for her prosecution of the action. In any event, the dispute as to that issue, as well as the disputes with respect to all other issues raised by the respective parties, may best be resolved by the trial court on the basis of the facts adduced at the trial, rather than by this court upon disputed facts stated in affidavit form *(Wyzenbeek*v. *Wyzenbeek,*286 App. Div. 863; *Wightman*v. *Wightman,*7 A D 2d 859). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Klein-feld, Christ, Brennan and Rabin, JJ., concur.
C. A. No. 76-364.

#### State *v.*Charles Deroche.

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *Judith Romney Wegner,*Special Asst. Attorney General, for plaintiff.

*William F. Reilly,*Public Defender, *Barbara Hurst, John A. MacFadyen III,*Asst. Public Defenders, for defendant.

The defendant’s motion for a remand of this case to Superior Court for the purpose of determining whether the defendant is entitled to bail pending appeal, is granted.
§ 580.41 What types of geological data and information must I submit to BOEM? Unless the Regional Director specifies otherwise, you must submit geological data and information that include: ( a ) An accurate and complete record of all geological (including geochemical) data and information describing each operation of analysis, processing, and interpretation;
( b ) Paleontological reports identifying by depth any microscopic fossils collected, including the reference datum to which paleontological sample depths are related and, if the Regional Director requests, washed samples, that you maintain for paleontological determinations;
( c ) Copies of well logs or charts in a digital format, if available;
( d ) Results and data obtained from formation fluid tests;
( e ) Analyses of core or bottom samples and/or a representative cut or split of the core or bottom sample;
( f ) Detailed descriptions of any hydrocarbons or other minerals or hazardous conditions encountered during operations, including near losses of well control, abnormal geopressures, and losses of circulation; and
( g ) Other geological data and information that the RD may specify.
#### § 57.22315 Self-contained breathing apparatus (V-A mines).

Self-contained breathing apparatus of a duration to allow for escape from the mine and sufficient in number to equip all persons underground shall be strategically located throughout the mine. Such apparatus shall be approved by MSHA and NIOSH under 42 CFR part 84 and shall be maintained in accordance with manufacturers' specifications. This standard does not apply to double entry mining systems where crosscut intervals do not exceed 250 feet.

[52 FR 24941, July 1, 1987, as amended at 60 FR 30401, June 8, 1995]
§ 57.13015 Inspection of compressed-air receivers and other unfired pressure vessels. ( a ) Compressed-air receivers and other unfired pressure vessels shall be inspected by inspectors holding a valid National Board Commission and in accordance with the applicable chapters of the National Board Inspection Code, a Manual for Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors, 1979. This code is incorporated by reference and made a part of this standard. It may be examined at any Metal and Nonmetal Mine Safety and Health District Office of the Mine Safety and Health Administration, and may be obtained from the publisher, the National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors, 1055 Crupper Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43229.
( b ) Records of inspections shall be kept in accordance with requirements of the National Board Inspection Code, and the records shall be made available to the Secretary or his authorized representative.