alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 550.213 What general information must accompany the EP? The following general information must accompany your EP: ( a ) *Applications and permits.* A listing, including filing or approval status, of the Federal, State, and local application approvals or permits you must obtain to conduct your proposed exploration activities.
( b ) *Drilling fluids.* A table showing the projected amount, discharge rate, and chemical constituents for each type (*i.e.,* water-based, oil-based, synthetic-based) of drilling fluid you plan to use to drill your proposed exploration wells.
( c ) *Chemical products.* A table showing the name and brief description, quantities to be stored, storage method, and rates of usage of the chemical products you will use to conduct your proposed exploration activities. List only those chemical products you will store or use in quantities greater than the amounts defined as Reportable Quantities in 40 CFR part 302, or amounts specified by the Regional Supervisor.
( d ) *New or unusual technology.* A description and discussion of any new or unusual technology (see definition under § 550.200) you will use to carry out your proposed exploration activities. In the public information copies of your EP, you may exclude any proprietary information from this description. In that case, include a brief discussion of the general subject matter of the omitted information. If you will not use any new or unusual technology to carry out your proposed exploration activities, include a statement so indicating.
( e ) *Bonds, oil spill financial responsibility, and well control statements.* Statements attesting that: ( 1 ) The activities and facilities proposed in your EP are or will be covered by an appropriate bond under 30 CFR part 556, subpart I;
( 2 ) You have demonstrated or will demonstrate oil spill financial responsibility for facilities proposed in your EP according to 30 CFR part 553; and
( 3 ) You have or will have the financial capability to drill a relief well and conduct other emergency well control operations.
( f ) *Suspensions of operations.* A brief discussion of any suspensions of operations that you anticipate may be necessary in the course of conducting your activities under the EP.
( g ) *Blowout scenario.* A scenario for the potential blowout of the proposed well in your EP that you expect will have the highest volume of liquid hydrocarbons. Include the estimated flow rate, total volume, and maximum duration of the potential blowout. Also, discuss the potential for the well to bridge over, the likelihood for surface intervention to stop the blowout, the availability of a rig to drill a relief well, and rig package constraints. Estimate the time it would take to drill a relief well.
( h ) *Contact.* The name, address (e-mail address, if available), and telephone number of the person with whom the Regional Supervisor and any affected State(s) can communicate about your EP.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Amendments of the Bretton Woods Agreements Act

              																	United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, 1970-					 and 	Ninety-Fourth Congress, 1975-1977. 						*Amendments of the Bretton Woods Agreements Act : Hearing Before the Subcommittee on International Finance of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, United States Senate, Ninety-Fourth Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 13955, August 27, 1976*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										August 27, 1976,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/197,			accessed on September 5, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Exhibit
4-265




---



##### 



Premises
     Article I
 Definitions
  Article II
 Amendments to Supplemental Indenture
 Section 2.01Amendment to Section 2.05 of the Supplemental Indenture
  1




---



##### 



Section 2.02Amendment to Article III of the Supplemental Indenture
  Section 2.03Amendment to Section 4.02 of the Supplemental Indenture
     2




---



##### 



Section 2.04Amendment to Section 4.03 of the Supplemental Indenture
    3




---



##### 



4




---



##### 



Section 2.05Amendment to Section 4.04 of the Supplemental Indenture
       5




---



##### 



Article III
 Miscellaneous
 Section 3.01.
Amendment Construed with Supplemental Indenture
 Section 3.02. Effectiveness and Effect of Amendment
 Section 3.03. Severability
 Section 3.04. Headings
 Section 3.05. Counterparts
 Section 3.06. Governing Law
  6




---



##### 



THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANYBy:

/s/ Edward SolomonName:
    Edward SolomonTitle:
    Assistant Treasurer ATTEST:By:

/s/ Sandra Kay EnnisName:
    Sandra Kay EnnisTitle:
    Corporate Secretary THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST
COMPANY, N.A., as TrusteeBy:
    /s/Alexis M. JohnsonName:
    Alexis M. JohnsonTitle:
    Assistant Vice President ATTEST:By:

/s/ J. Michael BanasName:
    J. Michael BanasTitle:
    Vice President 7
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Matthew MacNeil

Berdon, J., dissenting. I would grant the defendant’s petition for certification.

*Thomas P. Cody*and *Sally S. King,*in support of the petition.

Decided September 25, 1992

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 28 Conn. App. 508, is denied.
**Exhibit 32**

**Section 1350 CertificationsPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title18, United States Code)**

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officersof Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc. (the “Company”) does herebycertify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

1.                the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 of theCompany (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| May 11, 2005 | /s/  BRADY W. DOUGAN |                                     |
|-------------------|----------------------|------------------------------------------|
|              | Name:                | Brady W. Dougan                          |
|              | Title:               | *President and Chief Executive Officer*  |
| May 11, 2005 | /s/ DAVID  C. FISHER |                                     |
|              | Name:                | David C. Fisher                          |
|              | Title:               | *Chief Financial and Accounting Officer* |
|                   |                      |                                          |  |

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                          EXHIBIT 10(iii)(A)(99)

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                     TO THE
                        NATIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC.
                2001 NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTORS' STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

         THIS AMENDMENT made as of the ____ day of April, 2002, by National
Service Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Corporation");

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

         WHEREAS, the Corporation has previously established the National
Service Industries, Inc. 2001 Nonemployee Directors' Stock Incentive Plan (the
"Plan") for the benefit of its nonemployee directors and their beneficiaries;
and

         WHEREAS, pursuant to the power of amendment contained in Section 10 of
the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Corporation desires to amend the Plan;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

                                       1.

         Section 5.2 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the existing
section in its entirety and substituting the following:

                  "5.2 Purchase Price. The purchase price for Shares under each
         Option shall be not less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a Share
         on the date the Option is granted."


                                       2.

         This Amendment shall be effective as of the date and year first
provided above. Except as provided herein, the provisions of the Plan shall
remain in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Amendment No. 1 to
be executed by its duly authorized corporate officers as of the date and year
first written above.

ATTEST:                                     NATIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC.



By: __________________________              By:_________________________________

                                            Name:_______________________________

                                            Title:______________________________
### §3615. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–359, title VIII, §806(b)(2), Oct. 14, 1994, 108 Stat. 3442

Section, Pub. L. 86–36, §17, as added Pub. L. 102–88, title V, §503, Aug. 14, 1991, 105 Stat. 436, related to post-employment assistance for certain National Security Agency employees.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified in a note under section 402 of this title and repealed prior to editorial reclassification as this section.

Another section 17 of Pub. L. 86–36 was renumbered section 18 and is classified to section 3616 of this title.
§ 550.115 How do I determine well producibility? You must follow the procedures in this section to determine well producibility if your well is not in the GOM. If your well is in the GOM you must follow the procedures in either this section or in § 550.116 of this subpart. ( a ) You must write to the Regional Supervisor asking for permission to determine producibility.
( b ) You must either: ( 1 ) Allow the Regional Supervisor to witness each test that you conduct under this section; or
( 2 ) Receive the Regional Supervisor prior approval so that you can submit either test data with your affidavit or third party test data.
( c ) If the well is an oil well, you must conduct a production test that lasts at least 2 hours after flow stabilizes.
( d ) If the well is a gas well, you must conduct a deliverability test that lasts at least 2 hours after flow stabilizes, or a four-point back pressure test.
#### UNITED STATES v. TINKOFF

No. 10746.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

March 9, 1954.

*893Paysoff Tinkoff, in pro. per.

Irwin N. Cohen, U. S. Atty., John Peter Lulinski, Asst. U. S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., Robert B. Cook, Chicago, Ill., for appellee.

Before MAJOR, Chief Judge, and DUFFY and SWAIM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Tinkoff, appellant here, petitioned the district court, “that an order be entered for a rule to show cause as to why Emanuel I. Goldfine is not in contempt of the order of this [district] court entered on November 16, 1942 * * He appeals from an order, entered below on June 23, 1952, dismissing his petition and from three other orders containing several companion rulings denying him, *inter alia,*leave to amend his petition and to vacate the order of dismissal.

Pursuing his customary pattern, appellant sought to create an appealable order by his attempt to amend his initial pleading, and thereafter to vacate the first order rejecting it. These subsequent steps add nothing to the first petition to hold Goldfine in contempt for allegedly committing perjury by his oral responses to questions Tinkoff put to him on November 23, 1942.

We do not reach any questions otter than that raised by the motions of the United States and respondent E. I. Gold-fine, to dismiss this appeal. Those motions are sustained because the lower court’s order denying and dismissing Tinkoff’s petition is not an appealable order. Tinkoff v. Holly, 7 Cir., 1954, 209 F.2d 527; Hultberg v. Anderson, 7 Cir., 214 F. 349. See also United States v. Tinkoff, 7 Cir., 153 F.2d 106, 107. Nor do any of the other orders included in appellant’s notice of appeal rise to the requisite status of a final appeal-able order.

Both of the aforesaid motions are hereby sustained, and this appeal is dismissed.
### §46109. Joinder and intervention

A person interested in or affected by a matter under consideration in a proceeding before the Secretary of Transportation (or the Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration with respect to security duties and powers designated to be carried out by the Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration or the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration with respect to aviation safety duties and powers designated to be carried out by the Administrator) or civil action to enforce this part or a requirement or regulation prescribed, or an order or any term of a certificate or permit issued, under this part may be joined as a party or permitted to intervene in the proceeding or civil action.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1230; Pub. L. 115–254, div. K, title I, §1991(f)(8), Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3642.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 46109 | 49 App.:1489. | Aug. 23, 1958, Pub. L. 85–726, §1009, 72 Stat. 796. |
| | 49 App.:1551(b)(1)(E). | Aug. 23, 1958, Pub. L. 85–726, 72 Stat. 731, §1601(b)(1)(E); added Oct. 4, 1984, Pub. L. 98–443, §3(e), 98 Stat. 1704. |

Section

The words "proceeding . . . or civil action" are substituted for "proceeding . . . whether such proceedings be instituted . . . or be begun originally in any court of the United States" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code and rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (28 App. U.S.C.). The words "prescribed . . . issued" are added for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the Code. The words "condition, or limitation" are omitted as being included in "term". The words "may be joined as a party or permitted to intervene" are substituted for "it shall be lawful to include as parties, or to permit the intervention of" for clarity. The text of 49 App.:1489 (words after semicolon) is omitted as surplus.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–254 inserted "(or the Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration with respect to security duties and powers designated to be carried out by the Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration or the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration with respect to aviation safety duties and powers designated to be carried out by the Administrator)" after "Secretary of Transportation".
#### PECK v. BARNEY et al. (two cases).

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 16, 1903.)

Two actions by George W. Peck, as trustee, etc., against Gkarles T. Barney and others.

No opinions. Orders affirmed, with §10 costs in each case, and disbursements.
EXHIBIT 13.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Annual Report of Levon Resources Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Ron Tremblay, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: July 5, 2012
By:
/s/ Ron TremblayRon Tremblay, Principal Executive Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the annual report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### § 56.9317 Suspended loads.

Persons shall not work or pass under the buckets or booms of loaders in operation.
No. 8008.

#### Village of Perrysburg *v.*Buckhouse.

(Decided January 12, 1904.)

Error to Circuit Court of Wood county.

*Messrs. Baldwin & Harrington,*for plaintiff in. error.

*570*Messrs. James, Bever stock & Donahey,*for defendant in error.

Judgment of the circuit court reversed, and that of the common pleas affirmed.

Burket, C. J., Spear, Davis, Shaucjk, Price and ■Crew, JJ., concur.
§ 1220.032 Inventories. ( a ) The lessee is responsible for NPSL materiel and shall make proper and timely cost and credit notations for all materiel movements affecting NPSL property. The lessee shall provide only such materiel as may be required for immediate use or is consistent with practical, efficient, and economical operations. The accumulation of surplus stocks shall be avoided by proper materiel control, inventory and purchasing. The lessee shall make timely disposition of idle and surplus materiel through sale.
( b ) At reasonable intervals, but at least once every three years, inventories of controllable materiel shall be taken by the lessee. Written notice of intention to take inventory shall be given by the lessee at least 30 days before any inventory is to be taken so that the BOEM Director may be represented at the taking of inventory. Failure of the BOEM Director to be represented at an inventory shall bind the BOEM Director to accept the inventory taken by the lessee, except in the case of willful misrepresentation or fraud.
( c ) Inventory shall be valued with any generally accepted accounting method used by the lessee to value the same materiel for financial or income tax reporting purposes, provided that the method is consistently applied throughout the life of the materiel.
( d ) Reconciliation shall be made of a physical inventory with the NPSL capital account by the lessee, and a list of overages and shortages shall be available to the BOEM Director for audit as provided in § 1220.033. Inventory adjustments of controllable materiel shall be made by the lessee to the NPSL capital account for overages and shortages. Controllable materiel removed from physical inventory that has not been credited to NPSL operations under § 1220.015(a)(2) shall be credited to NPSL operations at its original value, except that when the cost of the materiel originally qualified for the allowance for capital recovery in § 1220.020, the credit shall be calculated pursuant to § 1220.021(a)(3).
[45 FR 36800, May 30, 1980, as amended at 75 FR 61087, Oct. 4, 2010]
EXHIBIT 13.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Levon Resources Ltd (the "Company")
on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the "Form  20-F") I,  Louis  Wolfin,
President (and acting Principal Executive),  of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:

     (1)  The Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934  (15  U.S.C.  78M or
          78o(d)); and

     (2)  The  information  contained in the Form 20-F fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: October 10, 2005             /s/ Louis Wolfin
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    Louis Wolfin, President
                                    (Principal Executive Officer)
#### § 735.28 Disclosure of information.

All grant applications received by the Director or his authorized designee constitute agency records. As such, their release may be requested by any member of the public under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, and shall be disclosed unless exempt from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552(b).
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 99







    Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Titla 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Detrex Corporation, a Michigan corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission (the "Report") that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                  material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


November 14, 2002          /s/ Thomas E. Mark
                           ---------------------------------------------
                           Thomas E. Mark
                           President and Chief Executive Officer


November 14, 2002          /s/ Steven J. Quinlan
                           ---------------------------------------------
                           Steven J. Quinlan
                           Treasurer, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
#### § 56.19100 Shaft landing gates.

Shaft landings shall be equipped with substantial safety gates so constructed that materials will not go through or under them; gates shall be closed except when loading or unloading shaft conveyances.