alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Terence Sein, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Alpha Spacecom, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and  15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a) Designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure controls and  procedures  to be designed  under my  supervision,  to ensure that material  information  relating  to the small  business  issuer,  including  its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Omitted;



c)  Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  small  business  issuer's  disclosure controls and procedures  and presented in this report my  conclusions  about the effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business  issuer's  internal control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small  business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business  issuer's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual  report) that has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  the small business  issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial  reporting,  to the small  business  issuer's  auditors  and the audit committee  of the  small  business  issuer's  board  of  directors  (or  persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other employees who have a significant  role in the small business  issuer's  internal control over financial reporting.

May 18, 2004

/s/ Terence Sein

Name:  Terence Sein

Title:  Chief Financial Officer
## THE STATE OF TEXAS MANDATE

TO THE 336TH DISTRIC T COURT OF FANNIN CO UNTY, GREETINGS: Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 4th day of February, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Timothy Earl Petty, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee No. 06

- 14

- 00150

- CR

Trial Court No. CR

- 12

- 24244

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court
below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. We note that the appellant, Timothy Earl Petty, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs. WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed. WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Cou rt of Appeals, with the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 22nd day of May , A.D. 2015

.

DEBRA K. AUTREY , Clerk
### §47130. Airport safety data collection

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration may award a contract, using sole source or limited source authority, or enter into a cooperative agreement with, or provide a grant from amounts made available under section 48103 to, a private company or entity for the collection of airport safety data. In the event that a grant is provided under this section, the United States Government's share of the cost of the data collection shall be 100 percent.

(Added Pub. L. 103–305, title I, §118(a), Aug. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 1580; amended Pub. L. 108–176, title I, §154, Dec. 12, 2003, 117 Stat. 2507.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2003—Pub. L. 108–176 reenacted section catchline without change and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration may contract, using sole source or limited source authority, for the collection of airport safety data."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2003 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 108–176 applicable only to fiscal years beginning after Sept. 30, 2003, except as otherwise specifically provided, see section 3 of Pub. L. 108–176, set out as a note under section 106 of this title.
#### Edwin Cordero, Respondent, v Ford Credit Titling Trust Insurance Center, Defendant, and Patricia Sammon et al., Appellants.

[834 NYS2d 721]—

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Patricia Sammon and Brian Sammon appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated July 14, 2006, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants Patricia Sammon and Brian Sammon made a prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955 [1992]). However, in opposition to the motion, the plaintiff raised a tri*797able issue of fact by submitting, inter alia, the affirmed report of a neurologist quantifying the decreased range of motion in his cervical and lumbar spines based upon a recent examination, and affirmed magnetic resonance imaging test reports finding multiple disc herniations and bulges *(see Santiago v Rodriguez,*38 AD3d 639 [2007]; *Lim v Tiburzi,*36 AD3d 671 [2007]; *Gonzalez v Baik,*36 AD3d 854 [2007]; *Holley v Salsa, Inc.,*35 AD3d 814 [2006]). Schmidt, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein, Covello and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 21


LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COMPANY                                                                                   STATE OF ORGANIZATION
-------                                                                                   ---------------------
<S>                                                                                       <C>
IMPACT Center of Albany, LLC                                                                    Tennessee
IMPACT Center of Bayonne, LLC                                                                  New Jersey
IMPACT Center of Billings, LLC                                                                   Montana
IMPACT Center of Fort Smith, LLC                                                                Tennessee
IMPACT Center of Glendale, LLC                                                                  Tennessee
IMPACT Center of Mobile, LLC                                                                    Tennessee
IMPACT Center of Mt. Diablo, LLC                                                                Tennessee
IMPACT Center of Northridge, LLC                                                                Tennessee
IMPACT Center of St. Johns, LLC                                                                 Tennessee
IMPACT Center of Tri-City Medical Center, LLC                                                   Tennessee
IMPACT Center of Washington, D.C., LLC                                                          Tennessee
Response Oncology of Fort Lauderdale, Inc. *                                                     Florida
Response Oncology of Tamarac, Inc. *                                                             Florida
Response Oncology Management of South Florida, Inc. *                                           Tennessee
</TABLE>


* Wholly-owned.
#### § 57.17010 Electric lamps.

Individual electric lamps shall be carried for illumination by all persons underground.
§ 550.1155 What information must I submit for sensitive reservoirs? You must submit to the Regional Supervisor an original and two copies of Form BOEM-0127; one of the copies must be a public information copy in accordance with §§ 550.186 and 550.197, and marked “Public Information.” You must also submit two copies of the supporting information, as listed in the table in § 550.1167. You must submit this information: ( a ) Within 45 days after beginning production from the reservoir or discovering that it is sensitive;
( b ) At least once during the calendar year, but you do not need to resubmit unrevised structure maps (§ 550.1167(a)(2)) or previously submitted well logs (§ 550.1167(c)(1));
( c ) Within 45 days after you revise reservoir parameters; and
( d ) Within 45 days after the Regional Supervisor classifies the reservoir as sensitive under § 550.1154(c).
#### § 57.11025 Railed landings, backguards, and other protection for fixed ladders.

Fixed ladders, except on mobile equipment, shall be offset and have substantial railed landings at least every 30 feet unless backguards or equivalent protection such as safety belts and safety lines, are provided.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

    Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Detrex Corporation, a Michigan corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission ( the "Report") that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                  material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Detrex Corporation and will be retained by Detrex Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


August 14, 2003                        /s/ Thomas E. Mark
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Thomas E. Mark
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer


August 14, 2003                        /s/ Steven J. Quinlan
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Steven J. Quinlan
                                       Vice President -- Finance, Treasurer and
                                       Chief Financial Officer
#### § 57.12026 Grounding transformer and switchgear enclosures.

Metal fencing and metal buildings enclosing transformers and switchgear shall be grounded.
#### § 57.16011 Riding hoisted loads or on the hoist hook.

Persons shall not ride on loads being moved by cranes or derricks, nor shall they ride the hoisting hooks unless such method eliminates a greater hazard.
Order entered November 10, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 22

- 00691

- CV

VEREIT REAL ESTATE, L.P., COLE LA DALLAS TX, LLC, COLE LA DENTON TX, LLC, AND COLE LA DU NCANVILLE TX, LLC , Appellant s

V.

FITNESS INTERNATIONAL, LLC , Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 20

- 18444

O RDER
By letter filed Nove mber 9, 2022, court reporter Diane L. Robert informs the

Court that volume 5 , an exhibit volume, of t he reporter’ s record filed September

16, 2022, included “incorrect exhibits.” She note s corrections to volume 5 have

been made, and a corrected volume has been filed.
In light of the errors and corrections, we STRIKE volume 5 filed September

16. The appeal shall proceed on the corrected volume 5 filed November 9.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 11.1


                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                              Three Months Ended
                                                                                   March 31,
                                                                           1998              1997
                                                                           ----              ----
<S>                                                                        <C>               <C>
 Basic

 Weighted average common shares outstanding (3)                            13,369,191        10,967,854
 Net income (loss) after adjustment for preferred
 dividends earned on JIS stock                                            $   363.138      ($   273,172)
                                                                          ===========       =========== 
 Basic net income (loss) per common share                                       $0.03            ($0.02)
                                                                                =====            ======

 Diluted

 Weighted average common shares outstanding (1) (2) (3)                    13,380,607        11,230,854
 Net income (loss) after adjustment for preferred dividends 
 earned on JIS stock and interest saved on conversion of debt             $   363,138      ($   269,422)
                                                                          ===========       =========== 
 Diluted net income (loss) per common share                                     $0.03            ($0.02)
                                                                                =====            ====== 
</TABLE>


(1)  Options on 521,500 shares and 593,000 shares in 1998 and 1997,
     respectively, not included in computing diluted earnings per share because
     their effects are anti-dilutive.

(2)  In 1998 options to purchase 82,500 shares, less 71,084 shares to be
     purchased under the Treasury Stock method, are included in weighted average
     shares outstanding.

(3)  Excludes 40,000 shares of Treasury Stock from its date of purchase on
     February 28, 1998.


                                       17
### §1863. Congressional oversight

(a) On a semiannual basis, the Attorney General shall fully inform the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate concerning all requests for records under this subchapter.

(b) On a semiannual basis, the Attorney General shall provide to the Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report setting forth with respect to the preceding 6-month period—

(1) the total number of applications made for orders approving requests for records under this subchapter; and

(2) the total number of such orders either granted, modified, or denied.

(Pub. L. 95–511, title V, §503, as added Pub. L. 105–272, title VI, §602, Oct. 20, 1998, 112 Stat. 2412; Pub. L. 109–177, title I, §102(b)(1), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 195; Pub. L. 111–118, div. B, §1004(a), Dec. 19, 2009, 123 Stat. 3470; Pub. L. 111–141, §1(a), Feb. 27, 2010, 124 Stat. 37; Pub. L. 112–3, §2(a), Feb. 25, 2011, 125 Stat. 5; Pub. L. 112–14, §2(a), May 26, 2011, 125 Stat. 216; Pub. L. 114–23, title VII, §705(a), (c), June 2, 2015, 129 Stat. 300; Pub. L. 116–69, div. B, title VII, §1703(a), Nov. 21, 2019, 133 Stat. 1143.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2019—Pub. L. 116–69 amended directory language of Pub. L. 109–177, §102(b)(1). See 2006 Amendment note below.

2015—Pub. L. 114–23, §705(a), (c), amended directory language of Pub. L. 109–177, §102(b)(1). See 2006 Amendment note below.

2011—Pub. L. 112–14 amended directory language of Pub. L. 109–177, §102(b)(1). See 2006 Amendment note below.

Pub. L. 112–3 amended directory language of Pub. L. 109–177, §102(b)(1). See 2006 Amendment note below.

2010—Pub. L. 111–141 amended directory language of Pub. L. 109–177, §102(b)(1). See 2006 Amendment note below.

2009—Pub. L. 111–118 amended directory language of Pub. L. 109–177, §102(b)(1). See 2006 Amendment note below.

2006—Pub. L. 109–177, §102(b)(1), revived this section to read as it read on Oct. 25, 2001.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Revival

Section, which had been repealed by Pub. L. 107–56, title II, §215, Oct. 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 287, was revived by section 102(b)(1) of Pub. L. 109–177 effective Mar. 15, 2020, except that former provisions to continue in effect with respect to any particular foreign intelligence investigation that began before Mar. 15, 2020, or with respect to any particular offense or potential offense that began or occurred before Mar. 15, 2020, see section 102(b) of Pub. L. 109–177, set out as an Effective Date of 2006 Amendment note under section 1805 of this title.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 11, 2010 

s0303 

Order 

 

March 11, 2010 

139588 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139588 

 COA: 279715 

Genesee CC: 06-018545-FC 

JERRY O’KEITH WALKER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 14, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 KELLY, C.J., would grant leave to appeal.
1-800-321-OSHA (6742)

TTY 1-877-889-5627

Consejos de Seguridad para Proteger a 

los Trabajadores del Servicio Automotriz 

de la Exposición al Coronavirus

Los siguientes consejos de seguridad pueden ayudar a reducir el riesgo de 

exposición al coronavirus para los trabajadores del servicio automotriz:

 

Alentar que los trabajadores 

permanezcan en sus hogares 

si están enfermos.

 

Proporcionar guantes 

y mascarillas u otras 

cubiertas faciales. 

 

Mantener al menos 6 pies 

de distancia entre los 

compañeros de trabajo y 

clientes, de ser posible. 

 

Ofrecer servicio de recogida.

 

Cerrar o limite los clientes en 

las zonas de recepción y salas 

de espera.

 

Use opciones libres de 

contacto para pagos y citas.

 

Limpiar y desinfectar con 

frecuencia toda herramienta 

y equipo. 

 

Desalentar que los 

trabajadores compartan 

herramientas y equipo. 

 

Cubrir los asientos y desinfecte 

los llaveros y volantes antes y 

después del servicio.

 

Alentar que los trabajadores 

denuncien cualquiera 

preocupación acerca de la 

seguridad y la salud en el trabajo.

www.osha.gov

Para más información, visite 

www.osha.gov/coronavirus o 

llame al 1-800-321-OSHA (6742).

OSHA 4071-08 2020 — Steps to Protect Automotive Service Workers from Exposure to Coronavirus (Spanish)

Administración de 

Seguridad y Salud 

Ocupacional
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00557-CV

Chad William Towers, Appellant

v.

Amber Chriche Green, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-FM-06-003389, HONORABLE STEPHEN YELENOSKY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellee Amber Chriche Green filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of

jurisdiction arguing that Appellant Chad William Towers’s notice of appeal is untimely. See Tex.

R. App. P. 26.1. For the reasons that follow, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal for want

of jurisdiction.

Towers is appealing a May 27, 2014 trial-court order in a suit to modify the

parent-child relationship (SAPCR). Because Towers timely filed a motion for new trial, he was

required to file his notice of appeal within 90 days after the order was signed. See Tex. R. App. P.

26.1(a)(1). Towers, however, filed his notice of appeal on September 4, 2014, more than 90 days

after the SAPCR order was signed. Towers did not file a motion to extend the deadline to file his

notice of appeal, but did file his notice of appeal within the time period for requesting an extension. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3.
“The timely filing of a notice of appeal is jurisdictional in this court, and absent a

timely filed notice of appeal or extension request, we must dismiss the appeal.” In re K.M.Z.,

178 S.W.3d 432, 433 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2005, no pet.); see Tex. R. App. P. 25.1, 26.1, 26.3. 

We imply a motion for extension of time “when a party, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal

within the fifteen-day period in which Rule 26.3(a) permits parties to file a motion for extension of

time to file their notice of appeal.” K.M.Z., 178 S.W.3d at 433 (citing Verburgt v. Dorner,

959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997)). Even when a motion for extension is implied, however, an

appellant still must reasonably explain the need for an extension. Id. (citing Jones v. City of

Houston, 976 S.W.2d 676, 677 (Tex. 1998); Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 617).

On December 10, 2014, the Clerk of this Court sent notice to Towers requesting a

response to the motion to dismiss by December 22, 2014. Towers has since filed his appellant’s

brief, but has not provided any explanation for why his notice of appeal was tendered late. Even

under the most liberal construction of Towers’s brief and other filings in this Court, we discern no

attempt to articulate a reasonable need for an extension. Accordingly, we dismiss Towers’s appeal

for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a); K.M.Z., 178 S.W.3d at 433.

_________________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: December 31, 2014

2
#### § 57.22305 Approved equipment (III mines).

Equipment used in or beyond the last open crosscut and equipment used in areas where methane may enter the air current, such as pillar recovery workings, longwall faces and shortwall faces, shall be approved by MSHA under the applicable requirements of 30 CFR parts 18 through 36. Equipment shall not be operated in atmospheres containing 1.0 percent or more methane.