alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2747. Authority for emergency planning, design, and construction activities

#### (a) Authority

The Secretary of Energy may use any funds available to the Department of Energy pursuant to a DOE national security authorization, including funds authorized to be appropriated for advance planning, engineering, and construction design, and for plant projects, to perform planning, design, and construction activities for any Department of Energy national security program construction project that, as determined by the Secretary, must proceed expeditiously in order to protect public health and safety, to meet the needs of national defense, or to protect property.

#### (b) Limitation

The Secretary may not exercise the authority under subsection (a) in the case of a construction project until the Secretary has submitted to the congressional defense committees a report on the activities that the Secretary intends to carry out under this section and the circumstances making those activities necessary.

#### (c) Specific authority

The requirement of section 2746(b)(2) of this title does not apply to emergency planning, design, and construction activities conducted under this section.

(Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLVII, §4707, formerly div. C, title XXXVI, §3626, Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2759; renumbered div. D, title XLVII, §4707, and amended Pub. L. 108–136, div. C, title XXXI, §3141(j)(2)(A)–(C), (D)(iii), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1781.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 7386f of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 108–136.

#### Amendments

2003—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 108–136, §3141(j)(2)(D)(iii), made technical amendment to reference in original act which appears in text as reference to section 2746(b)(2) of this title.
IIB 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9600 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 9, 2024 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 119 Main Street in Plains, Georgia, as the 

‘‘Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 9600 RFS

1 SECTION 1. JIMMY AND ROSALYNN CARTER POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 119 Main Street in Plains, Geor4 gia, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Jimmy and 

5 Rosalynn Carter Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Jimmy and Rosalynn 

10 Carter Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 5, 

2024. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### In re BRAUN.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 6, 1903.)

In the matter of John H. Braun. No opinion, motion denied. ;
#### In the Matter of Patricia Franklin, Respondent-Appellant, v. James E. Colaneri, Appellant-Respondent.

Motion by complainant to dismiss defendant’s appeal denied on condition: (1) that defendant perfect his appeal and be ready to argue or submit it at the October Term, beginning October 1, 1962 (appeal ordered on the calendar for said term); and (2) that, within 15 days after entry of the order hereon, defendant shall file an undertaking for $500, with corporate surety, to pay the sums directed to be paid by the order appealed from in the event such order be affirmed in whole or in part, or in the event the appeal therefrom be dismissed. The appeal will be heard on the original papers (including the typed minutes) and on typewritten briefs, which should contain a copy of the opinion, if any, rendered by the court below. Six copies of defendant’s typewritten brief as appellant must be filed, and one copy served, on or before August 1, 1962. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 984
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 984 appear at 65 FR 16731, Mar. 29, 2000.

§ 984.101 Purpose, applicability, and scope. ( a ) *Purpose.* ( 1 ) The purpose of the Family Self-Sufficiency (FSS) program is to promote the development of local strategies to coordinate the use of Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD or Department) assistance with public and private resources, to enable families eligible to receive HUD assistance to achieve economic independence and self-sufficiency.
( 2 ) The purpose of this part is to implement the policies and procedures applicable to operation of an FSS program, as established under section 23 of the 1937 Act (42 U.S.C. 1437u).
( b ) *Applicability.* This part applies to Public Housing Agencies (PHAs) administering a public housing program under section 9, a project-based and/or tenant-based assistance program under section 8(o) of the U.S. Housing Act of 1937 (1937 Act), a Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) homeownership program under section 8(y) of the U.S. Housing Act of 1937, or Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation for low-income families and Moderate Rehabilitation Single Room Occupancy for homeless individuals under 24 CFR part 882. See part 887 of this title for program regulations applicable to owners of multifamily assisted housing.
( c ) *Scope.* Each PHA that administers an FSS program must do so in accordance with the requirements of this part. See § 984.105 for more information concerning PHAs that are required to administer an FSS program.
( d ) *Non-participation.* Participation in an FSS program is voluntary. A family's admission to the public housing or Section 8 programs cannot be conditioned on participation in FSS. A family's housing assistance cannot be terminated by reason of such election or due to an FSS family's failure to comply with FSS program requirements in this part.
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 15-8










DTE Energy Company and
The Detroit Edison Company
Detroit, Michigan

We have made reviews, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of DTE Energy Company and subsidiaries and The Detroit Edison
Company and subsidiaries for the periods ended June 30, 1998 and 1997, as
indicated in our report dated July 27, 1998. Because we did not perform an
audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998, is
incorporated by reference in the following Registration Statements:

         FORM                       REGISTRATION NUMBER

         DTE Energy Company
         Form S-3                   33-57545
         Form S-8                   333-00023
         Form S-8                   333-47247

         The Detroit Edison Company
         Form S-3                   33-53207
         Form S-3                   33-64296

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.




Deloitte and Touche
Detroit, Michigan
July 27, 1998
EXHIBIT 13.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Annual Report of Levon Resources Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Annie Chan, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: June 30, 2014
By:
/s/ Annie ChanAnnie ChanPrincipal Financial Officer
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the annual report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### § 585.651 When may I construct complex or significant OCS facilities on my limited lease or any facilities on my project easement proposed under my GAP?

If you are applying for a project easement or installing a facility or a combination of facilities on your limited lease deemed by BOEM to be complex or significant, as provided in § 585.648(a)(1), you also must comply with the requirements of 30 CFR part 285, subpart G, and submit your safety management system description required by 30 CFR 285.810 before construction may begin.
#### § 553.702 What limit of liability applies to my offshore facility?

Except as provided in 33 U.S.C. 2704(c), the limit of liability under OPA for a responsible party for any offshore facility, including any offshore pipeline, is the total of all removal costs plus $167.8069 million for damages with respect to each incident.

[88 FR 22912, Apr. 14, 2023]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned hereby certifies that (i) the foregoing Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by August 15, 2008 for the quarter ended
June 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                    |  |                                              
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Date: July 30, 2008 |  | /s/ Ronald Leon Moore                        
|                    |  | Ronald Leon Moore                            
|                    |  | Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
|                    | 
|Date: July 30, 2008 |  | /s/ J. Alan Dickerson                        
|                    |  | J. Alan Dickerson                            
|                    |  | Vice President & Chief Financial Officer     



20
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > New York City Financial Crisis

              																	United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, 1970-					,	Proxmire, William					 and 	Ninety-Fourth Congress, 1975-1977. 						*New York City Financial Crisis : Hearings Before the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, United States Senate, Ninety-Fourth Congress, First Session on S. 1833, S. 1862, S. 2372, S. 2514, and S. 2523, October 9, 10, 18, and 23, 1975*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										October 9, 10, 18, and 23, 1975,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/782,			accessed on September 19, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
1-800-321-OSHA (6742)

TTY 1-877-889-5627

OSHA 4005-04 2020 — Ten Steps All Workplaces Can Take to Reduce Risk of Exposure to Coronavirus — Chinese Simplified

www.osha.gov

职业安全与健

康管理局

适用于所有工作场所的降低冠状病毒

接触风险的十个步骤

所有工作场所都可以采取以下预防措施来保护员工:

1.	 如果员工染病,鼓励

员工在家休息。

2.	 鼓励呼吸相关礼仪,

如咳嗽与打喷嚏时覆

盖口鼻。

3.	 提供可供洗手的区

域,或提供含酒精量

至少60%的酒精速干

擦手液。

4.	 如有可能,限制工作

场地员工人数,仅允

许关键员工进入。

5.	 如有可能,设立灵活

工作场所(如,远程办

公)以及灵活工作时

间(如,错峰轮班。

6.	 尽量避免员工互相使

用他人电话、办公桌

或其他工具或器械。

7.	 经常性地对工作台

面、器械和其他工作

环境中的物品做清洁

工作。

8.	 采用经环境保护局

(EPA)审核的、标

签显示抗冠状病毒的

清洁用化学剂。

9.	 遵照制造商的指示使

用所有清洁剂产品与

消毒产品。

10.	鼓励员工上报任何安全

与健康相关的顾虑。

➊

➋

➌

➍

➎

➏

➐

➑

➒

➓

更多信息,请访问 

www.osha.gov/coronavirus 

或拨打 1-800-321-OSHA 

(6742)。
#### § 57.4000 Definitions.

The following definitions apply in this subpart.

*Combustible liquids.* Liquids having a flash point at or above 100 °F (37.8 °C). They are divided into the following classes:

Class II liquids—those having flash points at or above 100 °F (37.8 °C) and below 140 °F (60 °C).

Class IIIA liquids—those having flash points at or above 140 °F (60 °C) and below 200 °F (93.4 °C).

Class IIIB liquids—those having flash points at or above 200 °F (93.4 °C).

*Escapeway.* A designated passageway by which persons can leave an underground mine.

*Flash point.* The minimum temperature at which sufficient vapor is released by a liquid to form a flammable vapor-air mixture near the surface of the liquid.

*Main fan.* A fan that controls the entire airflow of an underground mine or the airflow of one of the major air circuits of the mine.

*Mine opening.* Any opening or entrance from the surface into an underground mine.

*Safety can.* A container of not over five gallons capacity that is designed to safely relieve internal pressure when exposed to heat and has a spring-closing lid and spout cover.

[50 FR 4082, Jan. 29, 1985, as amended at 68 FR 32361, May 30, 2003; 69 FR 38842, June 29, 2004]
§ 550.262 What administrative information must accompany the DPP or DOCD? The following administrative information must accompany your DPP or DOCD: ( a ) *Exempted information description (public information copies only).* A description of the general subject matter of the proprietary information that is included in the proprietary copies of your DPP or DOCD or its accompanying information.
( b ) *Bibliography.* ( 1 ) If you reference a previously submitted EP, DPP, DOCD, study report, survey report, or other material in your DPP or DOCD or its accompanying information, a list of the referenced material; and
( 2 ) The location(s) where the Regional Supervisor can inspect the cited referenced material if you have not submitted it.
#### NELSON v. LOONEY.

No. 4759.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

March 13, 1954.

Ralph M. Clark, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

George Templar, U. S. Atty., Arkansas City, Kan., for appellee.

Before HUXMAN, MURRAH and PICKETT, Circuit Judges.

MURRAH, Circuit Judge.

Holding the remedy afforded petitioner under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 exclusive, the trial court dismissed this application for writ of habeas corpus and remanded the Appellant to the custody of the warden of the United States Penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas. We agree.

The Appellant pleaded guilty to an indictment containing four counts charging the transportation in interstate commerce of four falsely made, forged and counterfeited checks in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2314. After commitment, Appellant filed a motion to vacate under § 2255 alleging that he had not committed the offense charged and that he had been misled and deceived into pleading guilty.

After extended hearings in which the petitioner appeared in person and testified, being represented by court-appointed counsel, the trial court denied the motion to vacate and denied the application to appeal forma pauperis. No further action was taken in that case.

This application for a writ of habeas corpus is based upon a repetition of the same allegations asserted in the motion to vacate with the additional complaint that the remedy afforded under § 2255 is “inadequate and ineffectual” for the reason that he was not accorded a full hearing and was denied appeal.

The short and conclusive answer to the contention is that he is now held in confinement under color of a judgment and sentence of the sentencing court which he has not shown to have fully served, and therefore habeas corpus is not available. See Holloway v. Looney, 10 Cir., 1953, 207 F.2d 433; Smith v. United States, 10 Cir., 1953, 205 F.2d 768; Kreuter v. United States, 10 Cir., 1952, 201 F.2d 33; Clough v. Hunter, 10 Cir., 1951, 191 F.2d 516; Barnes v. Hunter, 10 Cir., 1951, 188 F.2d 86.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Altria Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William F. Gifford, Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ WILLIAM F. GIFFORD, JR.                         
|William F. Gifford, Jr.                             
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|July 1, 2015
### §8. Respect for flag

No disrespect should be shown to the flag of the United States of America; the flag should not be dipped to any person or thing. Regimental colors, State flags, and organization or institutional flags are to be dipped as a mark of honor.

(a) The flag should never be displayed with the union down, except as a signal of dire distress in instances of extreme danger to life or property.

(b) The flag should never touch anything beneath it, such as the ground, the floor, water, or merchandise.

(c) The flag should never be carried flat or horizontally, but always aloft and free.

(d) The flag should never be used as wearing apparel, bedding, or drapery. It should never be festooned, drawn back, nor up, in folds, but always allowed to fall free. Bunting of blue, white, and red, always arranged with the blue above, the white in the middle, and the red below, should be used for covering a speaker's desk, draping the front of the platform, and for decoration in general.

(e) The flag should never be fastened, displayed, used, or stored in such a manner as to permit it to be easily torn, soiled, or damaged in any way.

(f) The flag should never be used as a covering for a ceiling.

(g) The flag should never have placed upon it, nor on any part of it, nor attached to it any mark, insignia, letter, word, figure, design, picture, or drawing of any nature.

(h) The flag should never be used as a receptacle for receiving, holding, carrying, or delivering anything.

(i) The flag should never be used for advertising purposes in any manner whatsoever. It should not be embroidered on such articles as cushions or handkerchiefs and the like, printed or otherwise impressed on paper napkins or boxes or anything that is designed for temporary use and discard. Advertising signs should not be fastened to a staff or halyard from which the flag is flown.

(j) No part of the flag should ever be used as a costume or athletic uniform. However, a flag patch may be affixed to the uniform of military personnel, firemen, policemen, and members of patriotic organizations. The flag represents a living country and is itself considered a living thing. Therefore, the lapel flag pin being a replica, should be worn on the left lapel near the heart.

(k) The flag, when it is in such condition that it is no longer a fitting emblem for display, should be destroyed in a dignified way, preferably by burning.

(Added Pub. L. 105–225, §2(a), Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1497.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8 | 36:176. | June 22, 1942, ch. 435, §4, 56 Stat. 379; Dec. 22, 1942, ch. 806, §4, 56 Stat. 1076; July 7, 1976, Pub. L. 94–344, (12)–(16), 90 Stat. 812. |

Section
#### The People of the State of New York v. Charles La Placa.

Motion granted and time for argument of appeal enlarged to include November 1962 Term.
#### ADAMS *vs.*THE STATE.

[aeeeai, ebom judgment oe circuit coubt on motion to betax costs.]

1. *Solicitor’s fee; when properly allowed, as for a conviction of assault until weapon.*— If a party is indicted for an assault with intent to murder, with a pistol, knife or other weapon, and puts in a plea of guilty of a simple assault, his plea is an admission of charge as made, denying only the extent. In such a case, the solicitor’s fee is fifteen dollars.

2. *Bevenue law of*1868, *section*136 of; *what laws did not repeal.*— Section 136 of the revenue law of 1868 does not repeal the statutes in reference to the fees and coste of judicial litigation.

*422Appeal from the Circuit Court of Dallas.

Tried before Hon. M. J. Safford.

The defendant pleaded guilty of a simple assault, to an indictment charging an assault with intent to murder. The first count charged that the assault was made with a pistol; and the second, as having been made with a knife. The plea was received and a jury empanneled to assess the fine, which was fixed at $25.00; and thereupon, the court rendered judgment against the defendant for the fine and costs of the prosecution, and ordered his retention in custody until the same were paid, or the defendant otherwise discharged by due coarse of law.

The defendant, afterwards, moved to retax the costs, objecting specially to the solicitor’s fee of $15, and the two dollars county tax contained in the bill of costs. In support of the motion, the defendant proved that no evidence was introduced as to the facts of the case, or to show that any stick or other weapon was used, when his plea of guilty of a simple assault was received.

The court overruled the motion, &c., and hence this appeal.

Morgan, Lapsley *&*Nelson, for appellant.

Attorney-General, *contra.*

PEON, C. J.

The defendant’s plea admitted the assault as charged, denying only the intent. It was an admission that the assault was made with a weapon. Section 4848 of the Revised Code provides, that when the assault is with a stick or other weapon, the solicitor is entitled, on a conviction, to a fee of fifteen dollars.

The two dollars county tax was properly embraced in the bill of costs. Section 136 of the revenue law of 1868 did not repeal section 913 of the Revised Code, nor did it repeal the statutes in reference to the fees and costs of judicial litigation.

The judgment is affirmed, at the costs of appellant.