alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 8- 23 95

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Kail a F. Gil by

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.
Co m m is si on er, So ci al Secu rit y Adm in is tra ti on
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l

Defe nd an t - Ap pe ll ee

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s - F t. Sm it h

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Feb ru ary 27 , 20 19 Fi le d: Marc h 1 8, 2 01 9 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re GRUENDER, BOW MAN, an d S TRAS, Ci rcu it Ju dg es

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Kail a F. Gil by ap pe al s f r o m th e or de r of th e Dis tri ct Co ur t affi rm in g th e 1 de ci si on of an ad m in is tra ti ve la w jud ge (ALJ) de nyin g di sa bi li ty in su ran ce be ne fit s.

The Hon or ab le Erin L. W ie de mann , Uni te d St at es Mag is tra te Ju dg e fo r th e 1 W es te rn Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s, b y co ns en t o f th e p art ie s.Gil by co nt en ds th at th e ALJ erre d in hi s cred ib il it y de te rm in a t i o n , i mpro pe rly

di sc ou nt ed he r su bjec ti ve cl ai m s of pa in , an d fai le d to de ve lo p th e reco rd reg ard in g he r res id ua l fu nc ti on al cap aci ty (RFC ). Afte r de no vo rev ie w, we co nc lu de th at th e ALJ’s de ci si on is s u p p o r t e d by su bs ta nt ia l ev id en ce on th e reco rd as a who le

. See Ch an ey v. Co lv in , 81 2 F.3 d 67 2, 67 6 (8 th Ci r. 20 16 ) (s ta nd ard of rev ie w). W e fu rth er
co nc lu de th at th e ALJ’s cre di bi li ty find in gs are en ti tl ed to de fere nc e. See Cas ey v. Ast ru e, 50 3 F.3 d 68 7, 69 6 (8 th Ci r. 20 07 ) ( e x p l a in in g th at if an ALJ’s cred ib il it y de te rm in at io n is su pp or te d by su bs ta nt ia l ev id en ce, it is en ti tl ed to de fere nc e). And “[w]hi le an ALJ do es ha ve a du ty to de ve lo p th e reco rd , th is du ty is no t n e v e r
en di ng

. . . . The ALJ is req ui red to or de r m ed ic al ex am in at io ns an d te st s on ly if th e

m ed ic al reco rd s pr es e n te d to hi m do no t gi ve su ffi ci en t m ed ic al ev id en ce to d e t erm in e whe th er th e cl ai m an t is di sa bl ed .” McC oy v . As tru e, 64 8 F.3 d 6 0 5 , 6 1 2 (8 th Ci r. 20 11 ). Bec au se th e m ed ic al ev id e n c e i n th e reco rd co ns ti tu te d su ffi ci en t

ev id en ce of Gil by’ s RFC, th e ALJ was no t req ui red to fu rt h e r de ve lo p th e reco rd be fo re h im

.

W e aff irm th e jud gm en t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the quarterly  Report of Comtech  Group,  Inc. f/k/a Trident
Rowan Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ending June 30,
2004 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I,  Jeffrey  Kang,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
      of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Jeffrey Kang
-------------------------------
Name:  Jeffrey Kang
Title: Chief Executive Officer

September 17, 2004


                                       5
EXHIBIT 32.1
------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 USC, SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  annual  report  of  Alpha  Spacecom,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 26, 2005 (the "Report"),  I,
the  undersigned,  in the capacity  and on the date  indicated  below,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C./  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: August 16, 2005                   s/Xuedong Hu
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Xuedong Hu, Chief Executive Officer/CFO
Para mais informações, visite 

www.osha.gov/coronavirus ou 

telefone para 1-800-321-OSHA (6742).

1-800-321-OSHA (6742)

TTY 1-877-889-5627

OSHA 4009-04 2020 — Ten Steps All Workplaces Can Take to Reduce Risk of Exposure to Coronavirus — Brazilian Portuguese

www.osha.gov

Administração de 

Segurança e Saúde 

do Trabalho

Dez Medidas que Todos os Locais de 

Trabalho podem tomar para Reduzir o 

Risco de Exposição ao Coronavírus

É aconselhável que todos os locais de trabalho tomem as seguintes medidas 

para a prevenção de infecção para a proteção dos seus funcionários:

1. Incentivar aos funcionários 

a ficarem em suas casas se 

estiverem doentes.

2. Encorajar a etiqueta de 

respiração, inclusive cobrir 

eventuais tosses e espirros.

3. Fornecer um local para 

lavarem as mãos ou gel à 

base de álcool contendo 

pelo menos 60% de álcool 

para as mãos.

4. Limitar o acesso à área de 

trabalho / canteiro de obras 

somente para os trabalhadores, 

quando possível.

5. Implementar flexibilidade 

de áreas de trabalho (ex., 

teletrabalho) e horas de 

trabalho flexíveis (ex., turnos 

intercalados), se viável.

6. Alertar aos funcionários 

para não usarem telefones, 

mesas ou outras ferramentas 

e equipamentos de trabalho 

de outros funcionários.

7. Providenciar a limpeza e 

desinfecção regular de 

superfícies, equipamentos 

e outros elementos do 

ambiente de trabalho.

8. Usar produtos químicos 

de limpeza aprovados 

pela Agência de Proteção 

Ambiental dos EUA (EPA) 

com especificações no rótulo 

de ação contra o coronavírus.

9. Seguir as instruções de 

uso do fabricante de todos 

os produtos de limpeza e 

desinfecção.

10. Apoiar os relatos dos 

funcionários relacionados 

com preocupações com a 

segurança e saúde.

➊

➋

➌

➍

➎

➏

➐

➑

➒

➓
Exhibit  10.3



CERTIFICATION  OF  CHIEF  ACCOUNTING  OFFICER

Pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of 18 U.S.C. $ 1350, as adopted), Peter Machin, the Chief Accounting Officer
of  Futuremedia  Plc  (the "COMPANY"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:

1.     The  Company's  Annual  Report  on Form 20-F for the year ended April 30,
2002,  to  which  this  Certification  is  attached as Exhibit 10.3 (the "ANNUAL
REPORT"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended;  and

2.     The  information  contained  in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company  for  the  period  covered  by  the  Annual  Report.

Dated:     November  14,  2002


/s/  Peter  Machin
------------------
Peter  Machin


















<PAGE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 22, 2022

No. 04-22-00166-CV

IN RE THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice 

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice 

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice 

Following a March 15, 2022 hearing, the trial court signed an order entitled “Order 

Following Hearing Regarding Placement” (the “March 15 order”). 

On March 21, 2022, the Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the 

March 15 order. Relator also filed a motion asking this court to stay: the March 15 order, “any 

new or revised orders to have the same effect,” and the “trial court from taking punitive and 

coercive action to enforce the provisions of that order, including but not limited to incarceration 

and monetary sanctions.”

Given the time constraints, the Relator has not been able to obtain a transcript of the 

hearing. We ORDER Relator to file, no later than April 1, 2022, a transcript of the March 15, 

2022 hearing. 

We GRANT the motion for temporary emergency relief in part as follows:

1. The following decretal paragraph in the trial court’s “Order Following 

Hearing Regarding Placement” rendered on March 15, 2022, and signed on March 18, 

2022, is STAYED pending further order of this court:

2.1 IT IS ORDERED that a child specific contract shall be entered on or 

before March 25, 2022 that calls for payment up to the amount of $800 per 

day for placement of E.R.G. 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2020-PA-01204, styled In The Interest of E.R.G., A Child, pending in the 

37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas. The Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez signed the order at issue in this 

proceeding.
2. Any further proceedings regarding the creation of contracts or the payment 

of funds regarding the child’s placement and services are STAYED pending further order 

of this court. 

3. Any contempt proceedings, sanctions, or any enforcement of the “Order 

Following Hearing Regarding Placement” are STAYED pending further order of this 

court. 

It is so ORDERED on March 22, 2022.

 PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                      20,227,697
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               33,893,384
<ALLOWANCES>                                   243,031
<INVENTORY>                                 12,846,247
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            69,790,734
<PP&E>                                      45,157,125
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,511,784
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             107,522,183
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,450,342
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,681
<OTHER-SE>                                  87,366,866
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               107,522,183
<SALES>                                     54,018,617
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            54,018,617
<CGS>                                       22,896,334
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,896,334
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (8,510)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,552,919
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,065,876
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,487,043
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,487,043
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
§ 585.640 What is a General Activities Plan (GAP)? ( a ) A GAP describes your proposed construction, activities, and conceptual decommissioning plans for all planned facilities, including testing of technology devices and onshore and support facilities that you will construct and use for your project, including any project easements for the assessment and development of your limited lease or grant.
( b ) You must receive BOEM approval of your GAP before you can begin any of the proposed activities on your lease or grant.
#### BARSTOW, Respondent, v. FARRELL, Appellant, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 20, 1903.)

Action by Rogers L. Barstow, Jr., against Frank J. Farrell and others. M. D. Steuerer,' for appellant. H. C. Quinby, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
RE:Statistical analysis supporting the SO Statistical analysis supporting the SO Statistical analysis supporting the SO 2BART limit for Arcelor BART limit for Arcelor BART limit for Arcelor /Mittal

Jiang,Hongming Hongming Hongming(MPCA) to: Kathleen Dagostino 09/24/2012 11:48 AM

Cc: Steven Rosenthal, Sarah Cervak, "Fenske, MaryJean (MPCA)"

, "Neuschler, Catherine (MPCA)" , "Pak, Steven (MPCA)"

1 attachment

SO2 Data to Hongming.xls

Kathleen:

I found my analysis done in the attached spreadsheet file. That may be 

the good news. The bad news is it looks messy.

The 1st tab contains data from the testing firm ArcelorMittal hired to 

conduct the SO2 testing. From column BP to the right, I added my 

checks on the data.

In the 2nd tab, I added my calculations from Column G to the right, 

from Row 164 to below; then I added Column F to check the time 

sequence and gaps. You will see in cells K152:L152 that there are 146 

data points; in cells K169:L169 that the high-end of the 99% confidence 

interval for the mean of 3 new data points is 0.165 lbSO2/long ton 

pellets fired.

I added in the 3rd tab some summary data from a simulation based on 

the bootstrap technique. I did not include the detail simulation data in 

this tab, as it would take too much space. However, in cell L4, you will 

see I reference the value of 0.165 lbSO2/long ton pellets fired. The 

probability plot and histograms are generated using Minitab 16.

I hope this file gives what you are looking for, as I have a hard time 

figure out where “MPCA's December 2009 Regional Haze SIP submittal 

(Appendix 9.3)” is located at our server. Catherine and I belong to 

different divisions of our agency (she is very good at getting the 

essential calculations presented, while I tend to spread out everything 

on the worksheet before I end up with some desired outcome). She 

will be back next week. Please give me a call if you are lost anywhere 

in the attached file. Thanks!

- Hongming Jiang, Ph.D., P.E.

 Industrial Division

 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

 520 Lafayette Road North

 St. Paul, MN 55155-4194

 (651)757-2467 (voice)
 (651)296-8717 (fax)

 hongming.jiang@state.mn.us

 For MPCA info, click at www.pca.state.mn.us

From: Kathleen Dagostino [mailto:Dagostino.Kathleen@epamail.epa.gov

] 

Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 10:59 AM

To: Jiang, Hongming (MPCA)

Cc: Rosenthal.Steven@EPA.GOV; Sarah Cervak

Subject: Statistical analysis supporting the SO2 BART limit for 

Arcelor/Mittal

Could you please provide us with the statistical analysis MPCA used to 

set the SO2 BART limit of 0.165 lb SO2/LT for the Arcerlor/Mittal facility. 

This analysis is referenced on page 726 of MPCA's December 2009 

Regional Haze SIP submittal (Appendix 9.3). Please contact me or Steve 

Rosenthal if you have any questions. Thanks for your help. 

______________________

Kathleen D'Agostino

Environmental Engineer

U.S. EPA - Region 5

Phone: (312) 886-1767

email: dagostino.kathleen@epa.gov
#### § 56.15001 First-aid materials.

Adequate first-aid materials, including stretchers and blankets, shall be provided at places convenient to all working areas. Water or neutralizing agents shall be available where corrosive chemicals or other harmful substances are stored, handled, or used.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF IMPSAT FIBER NETWORKS, INC. AND ITS
CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         109,595
<SECURITIES>                                   442,427
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,242
<ALLOWANCES>                                    21,999
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               594,519
<PP&E>                                         341,308
<DEPRECIATION>                                 273,335
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,310,894
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          195,025
<BONDS>                                        811,036
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           914
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,310,894
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               123,517
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  155,896
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,018
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,483
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (66,429)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,070
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    68,892
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.80


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      29,303,000
<SECURITIES>                                12,141,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            42,580,000
<PP&E>                                       3,901,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               (585,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,960,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,117,000
<BONDS>                                        369,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,454,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,960,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            17,142,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (16,408,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (16,408,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (16,408,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.82)
        

</TABLE>
### §2463. Sharing of technology with Department of Defense

The Administrator shall, in cooperation with the Secretary of Defense, establish procedures and programs to provide for the sharing of technology, technical capability, and expertise between the Administration and the Department of Defense to further national security objectives.

(Pub. L. 106–65, div. C, title XXXII, §3263, Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 967.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Mar. 1, 2000, see section 3299 of Pub. L. 106–65, set out as a note under section 2401 of this title.
#### PETTIT, Respondent, v. TITTEMORE, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

November 11, 1903.)

Action, by Frances Pettit against James P. Tittemore.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

PARKER, P. J., and HOUGHTON, J., dissent.
Order entered April 6 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 22

- 00013

- CR

LEON BARNES III , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Cri m inal Court No. 10

Dallas County, Texas Trial Cou rt Cause No. M20

- 22544

- L

O RDER

On April 1, 2022, appellant provided written verification that he mailed

payment for the reporter ’s record on March 4, 2022

. In light of this, w e GRANT

court reporter Viviana Figueroa ’ s February 25, 2022 request for additional time

and ORDER the reporter ’s record in this appeal filed by May 2, 2 022.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
### §1827. Penalties

#### (a) Prohibited activities

A person is guilty of an offense if he intentionally—

(1) under color of law for the purpose of obtaining foreign intelligence information, executes a physical search within the United States except as authorized by statute; or

(2) discloses or uses information obtained under color of law by physical search within the United States, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through physical search not authorized by statute, for the purpose of obtaining intelligence information.

#### (b) Defense

It is a defense to a prosecution under subsection (a) that the defendant was a law enforcement or investigative officer engaged in the course of his official duties and the physical search was authorized by and conducted pursuant to a search warrant or court order of a court of competent jurisdiction.

#### (c) Fine or imprisonment

An offense described in this section is punishable by a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment for not more than five years, or both.

#### (d) Federal jurisdiction

There is Federal jurisdiction over an offense under this section if the person committing the offense was an officer or employee of the United States at the time the offense was committed.

(Pub. L. 95–511, title III, §307, as added Pub. L. 103–359, title VIII, §807(a)(3), Oct. 14, 1994, 108 Stat. 3452.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 90 days after Oct. 14, 1994, with exception for certain physical searches approved by the Attorney General to gather foreign intelligence information, see section 807(c) of Pub. L. 103–359, set out as a note under section 1821 of this title.