alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Telephone conversation between Patrick Mccullen, IAS and Alice Tome, Abt Associates Inc. June 22, 

2011. (Direct extension x3309) e-mail pmccullen@iasonline.org 

IAS is a signatory to both the IAF and the ILAC. Becoming a signatory is a year-long process that 

involves IAF or ILAC coming and auditing the organization that is applying - they watch as an audit(s) is 

done by the applicant. IAF does product certification by Guide 65. Soon (maybe by the end of 2011) 

Guide 65 will be replaced by ISO 17065 (there will likely be a phase in period of a year or two). 

The cost of becoming a signatory involves a fee, the audit costs and travel. It is in the thousands of 

dollars and Patrick M. will try to give me a cost estimate. The cost of the audit depends on both the 

number of disciplines being accredited (such as building materials or electrical) and the size of the 

accrediting body - for example IAS does 500 disciplines and A2LA does many more - it will cost A2LA.Ai 

more (not just a multiplier). 

IAS's parent is the ICC - the International Code Council- they write the codes for the US. 

ILAC does testing 17025 and inspection 17020 and 17020 and IAF does product certification. So if you 

want a signatory to those you will need both organizations. IAS is both ILAC and APLAC (sp.) signatory 

APLAC is a regional organization of APLAC. Once you are a signatory you will need to be reinspected at 

least every 4 years but this depends on how well you did on the last inspection and if there are problems 

they may come out every two years. IAS gets an inspection every 3 years. 

If there were to be a new standard requiring ABs, Patrick doubts that there would be new AB market 

entrants because of the start-up costs and time frame. You would need ILAC and IAF audits and to write 

documentation procedures - this would take at least a year and also would be costly. 

IAS does many MOU's with government and Patrick didn't think there would be a lot of expense unless 

there were very particular requirements that were different from the way they currently do business. If the 

standards were above ILAC or IAF there would be not problem - and he thinks the standards should be. 

He thought there would be legal review but other than that didn't think it would cost them much. 

IAS when they inspect requires that if a TPC is requesting product certification accreditation if they use a 

lab that is not theirs the lab must be 17025 accredited by ILAC.
Appeal No. 76-112.

#### Lum Realty *v.*Staten Island Moving and Storage.

*Keenan, Rice, Dolan, Reardon & Kiernan, John W. Kershaw,*for plaintiff.

*Gunning, LaFazia & Gnys, Inc., Richard T. Linn,*for defendant.

The motion of the plaintiff for an extension of time to file its brief is denied as moot, since the brief has already been filed.
#### § 56.9303 Construction of ramps and dumping facilities.

Ramps and dumping facilities shall be designed and constructed of materials capable of supporting the loads to which they will be subjected. The ramps and dumping facilities shall provide width, clearance, and headroom to safely accommodate the mobile equipment using the facilities.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
unaudited financial statements contained in the Company's Form 10-QSB and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                  991,506  
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           1,938
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        995,444 
<PP&E>                                  268,863 
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          1,274,780
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   34,963 
<BONDS>                                 0
<COMMON>                                1,416,908
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<OTHER-SE>                              (177,091)  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            1,274,780 
<SALES>                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        64,564
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           33,305          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         31,529
<INCOME-TAX>                            7,000 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     24,259
<DISCONTINUED>                          0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            24,259  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           .01 
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .01
        

</TABLE>
#### § 57.19001 Rated capacities.

Hoists shall have rated capacities consistent with the loads handled and the recommended safety factors of the ropes used.
#### § 57.12037 Fuses in high-potential circuits.

Fuse tongs or hotline tools, shall be used when fuses are removed or replaced in high-potential circuits.
§ 586.203 What process will BOEM use for competitively offering an Alternate Use RUE? ( a ) An Alternate Use RUE must be issued on a competitive basis unless BOEM determines, after public notice of the proposed Alternate Use RUE, that there is no competitive interest.
( b ) We will issue a public notice in the Federal Register to determine if there is competitive interest in using the proposed facility for alternate use activities. BOEM will specify a time period for members of the public to express competitive interest.
( c ) If we receive indications of competitive interest within the published timeframe, we will proceed with a competitive offering. As part of such competitive offering, each competing applicant must submit a description of the types of activities proposed for the existing facility, as well as satisfactory evidence that the competing applicant qualifies to hold a grant on the OCS, as required in §§ 586.107 and 586.108, by a date we specify. We may request additional information from competing applicants, as necessary, to adequately evaluate the competing proposals.
( d ) We will evaluate all competing proposals to determine whether: ( 1 ) The proposed activities are compatible with existing activities at the facility; and
( 2 ) BOEM and BSEE have the expertise and resources available to regulate the activities effectively.
( e ) We will evaluate all proposals under the requirements of NEPA, CZMA, and other applicable laws.
( f ) Following our evaluation, we will select one or more acceptable proposals for activities involving the alternate use of an existing OCS facility, notify the competing applicants, and submit each acceptable proposal to the lessee and owner of the existing OCS facility. If the lessee and owner of the facility agree to accept a proposal, we will proceed to issue an Alternate Use RUE. If the lessee and owner of the facility are unwilling to accept any of the proposals that we deem acceptable, we will not issue an Alternate Use RUE.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133343 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133343 

 COA: 261726 

Washtenaw CC: 03-001939-FC 

JOSEPH LEE BRICKEY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 9, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0723 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 30, 2007 

 Clerk
§ 586.10 Applicability. ( a ) *General.* This part applies to all installations that are approved for closure/realignment by the President and Congress under Pub. L. 101-510 after October 25, 1994.
( b ) *Request for inclusion under this process.* This part also applies to installations that were approved for closure/realignment under either Public Law 100-526 or Public Law 101-510 prior to October 25, 1994 and for which an LRA submitted a request for inclusion under this part to DoD by December 24, 1994. A list of such requests was published in the Federal Register on May 30, 1995 (60 FR 28089). ( 1 ) For installations with Title V applications pending but not approved before October 25, 1994, the LRA shall consider and specifically address any application for use of buildings and property to assist the homeless that were received by HHS prior to October 25, 1994, and were pending with the Secretary of HHS on that date. These pending requests shall be addressed in the LRA's homeless assistance submission.
( 2 ) For installations with Title V applications approved before October 25, 1994 where there is an approved Title V application, but property has not been assigned or otherwise disposed of by the Military Department, the LRA must ensure that its homeless assistance submission provides the Title V applicant with: ( i ) The property requested;
( ii ) Properties, on or off the installation, that are substantially equivalent to those requested;
( iii ) Sufficient funding to acquire such substantially equivalent properties;
( iv ) Services and activities that meet the needs identified in the application; or
( v ) A combination of the properties, funding, and services and activities described in § 586.10(b)(2)(i) through (iv).
( c ) *Revised Title V process.* All other installations approved for closure or realignment under either Public Law 100-526 or Public Law 101-510 prior to October 25, 1994, for which there was no request for consideration under this part, are covered by the process stipulated under Title V. Buildings or property that were transferred or leased for homeless use under Title V prior to October 25, 1994, may not be reconsidered under this part.
#### § 556.200 What is the Five Year leasing program?

Section 18(a) of OCSLA (43 U.S.C. 1344(a)), requires the Secretary to prepare an oil and gas leasing program that consists of a five-year schedule of proposed lease sales to best meet national energy needs, showing the size, timing, and location of leasing activity as precisely as possible. BOEM prepares the five year schedule of proposed lease sales consistent with the principles set out in section 18(a)(1) and (2)(A)-(H) of OCSLA (43 U.S.C. 1344(a)(1) and (2)(A)-(H)) to obtain a proper balance among the potential for environmental damage, the potential for the discovery of oil and gas, and the potential for adverse impact on the coastal zone, as required by OCSLA section 18(a)(3) (43 U.S.C. 1344(a)(3)).
#### § 57.14200 Warnings prior to starting or moving equipment.

Before starting crushers or moving self-propelled mobile equipment, equipment operators shall sound a warning that is audible above the surrounding noise level or use other effective means to warn all persons who could be exposed to a hazard from the equipment.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9614 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make certain provisions 

with respect to qualified ABLE programs permanent. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2024 

Mr. SMUCKER (for himself, Mr. BEYER, Mrs. RODGERS of Washington, Mrs. 

DINGELL, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Ms. NORTON, and Mr. STAUBER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

certain provisions with respect to qualified ABLE programs permanent. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Nationwide 

5 Access to a Better Life Experience Act’’ or the ‘‘ENABLE 

6 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9614 IH

1 SEC. 2. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF INCREASED CON2 TRIBUTIONS TO ABLE ACCOUNTS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 529A(b)(2)(B)(ii) of the 

4 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

5 ‘‘before January 1, 2026’’. 

6 (b) ALLOWANCE OF SAVERS CREDIT.—Section 

7 25B(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as 

8 amended by section 103(e)(1) of the SECURE 2.0 Act 

9 of 2022, is amended by striking ‘‘before January 1, 

10 2026,’’. 

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

13 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

14 SEC. 3. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF ROLLOVERS TO ABLE 

15 PROGRAMS FROM 529 PROGRAMS. 

16 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 529(c)(3)(C)(i)(III) of 

17 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

18 ‘‘before January 1, 2026,’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

20 this section shall apply to distributions made after the 

21 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in  connection  with the  filing of the  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended  September 30, 2004 (the  "Report") by
Brilliant Digital Entertainment,  Inc.  ("Registrant"),  each of the undersigned
hereby certifies that:

1.       to the  best of our  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with the
         requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

2.       to the best of our knowledge,  the information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         results of operations of Registrant.


Dated:  November 15, 2004                          /S/ KEVIN BERMEISTER
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Kevin Bermeister
                                                   Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  November 15, 2004                          /S/ TYLER TARR
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Tyler Tarr
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
### §327. Naval stations; use for commercial messages; rates

The Secretary of the Navy is authorized, unless restrained by international agreement, under the terms and conditions and at rates prescribed by him, which rates shall be just and reasonable, and which, upon complaint, shall be subject to review and revision by the Commission, to use all radio stations and apparatus, wherever located, owned by the United States and under the control of the Navy Department, (a) for the reception and transmission of press messages offered by any newspaper published in the United States, its Territories or possessions, or published by citizens of the United States in foreign countries, or by any press association of the United States, and (b) for the reception and transmission of private commercial messages between ships, between ship and shore, between localities in Alaska and between Alaska and the continental United States: Provided, That the rates fixed for the reception and transmission of all such messages, other than press messages between the Pacific coast of the United States, Hawaii, Alaska, Guam, American Samoa, the Philippine Islands, and the Orient, and between the United States and the Virgin Islands, shall not be less than the rates charged by privately owned and operated stations for like messages and service: Provided further, That the right to use such stations for any of the purposes named in this section shall terminate and cease as between any countries or localities or between any locality and privately operated ships whenever privately owned and operated stations are capable of meeting the normal communication requirements between such countries or localities or between any locality and privately operated ships, and the Commission shall have notified the Secretary of the Navy thereof.

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title III, §327, 48 Stat. 1091.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Philippine Islands, referred to in text, were granted their independence by Proc. No. 2695, eff. July 4, 1946, 11 F.R. 7517, 60 Stat. 1352, issued pursuant to section 1394 of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse, and set out under that section. They are now known as the Republic of the Philippines.
**Exhibit 32**

**Section 1350 CertificationsPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title18, United States Code)**

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officersof Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc. (the “Company”) does herebycertify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

1.                the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 ofthe Company (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| November 8, 2005  |   | /s/  BRADY W. DOUGAN |                                     |
|------------------------|--------|----------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                   |   | Name:                | Brady W. Dougan                          |
|                   |   | Title:               | *President and Chief Executive Officer*  |
| November 8,  2005 |   | /s/ DAVID  C. FISHER |                                     |
|                   |   | Name:                | David C. Fisher                          |
|                   |   | Title:               | *Chief Financial and Accounting Officer* |
|                        |        |                      |                                          |  |

 

----
EXHIBIT 31.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)


I, Rod Lynam, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Gallery of
History, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
annual period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

Date:  February 16, 2005
                                   /s/ROD LYNAM
                                   _______________________
                                   Rod Lynam
                                   Chief Financial Officer