alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2302. Definitions

In this chapter:

(1) The term "weapon of mass destruction" means any weapon or device that is intended, or has the capability, to cause death or serious bodily injury to a significant number of people through the release, dissemination, or impact of—

(A) toxic or poisonous chemicals or their precursors;

(B) a disease organism; or

(C) radiation or radioactivity.

(2) The term "independent states of the former Soviet Union" has the meaning given that term in section 5801 of title 22.

(3) The term "highly enriched uranium" means uranium enriched to 20 percent or more in the isotope U–235.

(Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title XIV, §1403, Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2717.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title XIV of div. A of Pub. L. 104–201, Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2714, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title XIV to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2301 of this title and Tables.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.7

           AGREEMENT MADE AS OF AUGUST 23, 2002 BETWEEN FIRST NATIONAL
                      BANK OF GAYLORD AND LARRY B. HIGGINS

         In consideration of the reliance placed by Larry B. Higgins as a
Director of First National Bank of Gaylord on the Board Resolution of June 18,
1990, as incorporated in Section 2.1 of the Bank's Bylaws prior to rescission of
the Resolution and the adoption of the Restated Bylaws in June 2002, First
National Bank of Gaylord (the "Bank"), and its successors and assigns, agrees to
provide, at Bank expense, to Larry B. Higgins and his current spouse, if any,
during their lifetimes, the health insurance coverage that is provided from time
to time to individual employees of the Bank and their spouses (not including
coverage of any other dependents); provided, that if Larry B. Higgins's current
spouse ceases to be his spouse, for any reason, (other than the death of Larry
B. Higgins), such former spouse will not be entitled to coverage, and the
coverage will not extend to a subsequent spouse of Larry B. Higgins; provided,
that if a surviving spouse, who otherwise would be entitled to coverage,
remarries and becomes entitled to health care coverage as the result of the
remarriage, such spouse will no longer be entitled to coverage from the Bank.
This agreement cannot be altered or modified, in any form, without the expressed
written consent of the Bank and Larry B. Higgins or, if he is deceased, the
express written consent of the surviving spouse, if any, who would be entitled
to coverage from the Bank.

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF GAYLORD

/s/ John R. Kluck                              /s/ Larry B. Higgins
-----------------------------------            ---------------------------------
John R. Kluck, President & CEO                 Larry B. Higgins, Director
### §60140. Cover over buried pipelines

(a) Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Incidents Involving Buried Pipelines.—

(1) Study.—The Secretary of Transportation shall conduct a study of hazardous liquid pipeline incidents at crossings of inland bodies of water with a width of at least 100 feet from high water mark to high water mark to determine if the depth of cover over the buried pipeline was a factor in any accidental release of hazardous liquids.

(2) Report.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall transmit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report on the results of the study.

(b) Assessment of Current Requirements for Depth of Cover Over Buried Pipelines.—

(1) In general.—If, following completion of the study under subsection (a), the Secretary finds that the depth of cover over buried pipelines is a contributing factor in the accidental release of hazardous liquids from the pipelines, the Secretary, not later than 1 year after the date of completion of the study, shall review and determine the sufficiency of current requirements for the depth of cover over buried pipelines.

(2) Legislative recommendations.—

(A) Development.—If the Secretary determines under paragraph (1) that the current requirements for the depth of cover over buried pipelines are insufficient, the Secretary shall develop legislative recommendations for improving the safety of buried pipelines at crossings of inland bodies of water with a width of at least 100 feet from high water mark to high water mark.

(B) Consideration of factors.—In developing legislative recommendations under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall consider the factors specified in section 60102(b)(2).

(C) Report to congress.—If the Secretary develops legislative recommendations under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall submit to the committees referred to in subsection (a)(2) a report containing the legislative recommendations.

(Added Pub. L. 112–90, §28(a), Jan. 3, 2012, 125 Stat. 1920.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of enactment of this section, referred to in subsec. (a)(2), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 112–90, which was approved Jan. 3, 2012.
#### JACOB v. THOMPSON.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 13, 1903.)

1. Trial — 1Transfer to Special Term — Laches.

Where an action has been noted for trial, and has been once tried, plaintiff’s right, after two years’ delay, to have the equitable issues raised by the answer sent to Special Term, is lost by loches.

Appeal from Special Term, New York County.

Action by Emma L. Jacob against J. Campbell Thompson. From an order directing issues raised by equitable counterclaim and reply to be tried at Special Term, defendant appeals. Reversed.

Argued before VAN BRUNT, P. J., and McLAUGHLIN, O’BRIEN, INGRAHAM, and LAUGHLIN, JJ.

Wm. P. Maloney, for appellant.

Chas. De Hart Brower, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We think that the plaintiff’s motion to place the cause on the Special Term calendar should have been denied upon the ground of loches. The action was noticed by both parties for Trial Term, and it has there been once tried, and now, after two years of delay, the effort is made to have it taken from the Trial Term calendar and sent to the Special Term. Upon the authority of the following cases, we think that the plaintiff, by loches, has waived his right to have the issues raised by the answer sent to the Special Term: Tubbs v. Embree, 89 Hun, 475, 35 N. Y. Supp. 320; Mackellar v. Rogers, 109 N. Y. 468, 17 N. E. 350; Boyd v. Boyd, 12 Misc. Rep. 119, 33 N. Y. Supp. 74, affirmed 146 N. Y. 403, 42 N. E. 542.

The order must be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with $10 costs. All concur.
#### § 35.8 Conduct of investigations, tests, and demonstrations.

Prior to the issuance of a certificate of approval, necessary Government personnel, representatives of the applicant, and such other persons as may be mutually agreed upon, may observe the investigations or tests. MSHA shall hold as confidential and shall not disclose features of this hydraulic fluid such as the chemical analysis, specifications, descriptions, and related material. After issuing a certificate of approval MSHA may conduct such public demonstrations and tests of the approved hydraulic fluid as it deems appropriate. The conduct of all investigations, tests, and demonstrations shall be under the direction and control of MSHA, and any other persons shall be present only as observers.

[Sched. 30, 24 FR 10201, Dec. 17, 1959, as amended at 39 FR 24005, June 28, 1974]
Triangle Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
                          (A Development Stage Company)
                    Computation of Net Loss Per Common Share
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                      Three Months    Nine Months    Three Months    Nine Months
                                         Ended           Ended          Ended           Ended
                                      September 30,   September 30,  September 30,  September 30,
                                         1999            1999            1998           1998
                                      -------------   -------------  -------------  -------------
<S>                                    <C>              <C>           <C>             <C>
Historical weighted average shares
   outstanding ...................       35,157           31,354        24,058          22,511
                                       --------         --------      --------        --------
Shares used in computing net loss
   per common share ..............       35,157           31,354        24,058          22,511
                                       ========         ========      ========        ========

Net Loss .........................     $(22,563)        $(73,423)     $(15,619)       $(46,283)
                                       ========         ========      ========        ========
Basic and diluted net loss per
   common share ..................     $  (0.64)        $  (2.34)     $  (0.65)       $  (2.06)
                                       ========         ========      ========        ========
</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Mark L. Brecker, Petitioner, v J. Henry Smith, as Commissioner/Administrator of the Human Resources Administration of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

Determination of respondent, Commissioner of Human Resources Administration of the City of New York, dated February 28, 1977, effective March 25, 1977, dismissing petitioner from his employment in the Department of Social Services, is unanimously modified, on the law, so as to substitute for the penalty of dismissal a suspension without pay until two months after the entry of the order hereon, and, as so modified, said determination is confirmed, without costs or disbursements. In view of this decision, the dispute as to interrogatories is moot. Petitioner, a case worker in the Department of Social Services, was found, after hearing, to be guilty of certain misconduct, including specifically the use of abusive and obscene language to a telephone operator; harassment of said operator by a letter on petitioner’s legal stationery demanding that she reimburse someone for $2 because of her alleged failure to perform her duties, and the filing of a claim in the Small Claims Court for said $2; profane and vulgar language used against his supervisor and grabbing the telephone receiver from the supervisor; and use of the department telephone number on his own professional stationery. Petitioner had once before been fined $100 for misconduct. The hearing officer recommended that respondent be suspended without pay for 30 workdays. The commissioner determined that this penalty was inadequate and dismissed petitioner from the staff. The evidence was sufficient to establish petitioner’s misconduct to the satisfaction of the hearing officer and the commissioner. However, with respect to the penalty to be imposed, we note that petitioner had been employed in the department for over 10 years; that he apparently performed his duties satisfactorily with the obvious qualifications of the previous disciplining and the present incident. When the complaint was made against him there was an informal conference after which his location head recommended a penalty of two months’ suspension without pay. Petitioner was informed that he could take up the matter through grievance machinery by giving notice to that effect within five days and apparently if he had, the penalty could not have exceeded two months’ suspension. Petitioner did not take advantage of this option and the matter went to formal disciplinary proceedings resulting in the hearing officer’s recommendation of suspension of 30 workdays and the commissioner’s determination to dismiss the petitioner. In the light of the circumstances, and particularly the fact that petitioner could have accepted a two months’ suspension and the matter would have been ended, we think the penalty imposed is so disproportionate to the offense as to warrant the modification here directed. (Cf. *Matter of Pauling v Smith,*46 AD2d 759; *Matter of Seales v Malcolm,*61 AD2d 920.) Concur—Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Silverman, Fein and Sullivan, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9638 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9638

   To amend the definition of State in title I of the Omnibus Crime 
     Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 17, 2024

 Mr. Sablan (for himself and Mrs. Radewagen) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the definition of State in title I of the Omnibus Crime 
     Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Northern Mariana Islands and 
American Samoa Criminal Justice Support Act''.

SECTION 2. DEFINITION OF STATE.

    Section 901(a)(2) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10251(a)(2)) is amended by striking 
``Northern Mariana Islands'' and all that follows through 
``Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.'' and inserting 
``Northern Mariana Islands;''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9658 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9658

  To establish ``Silver Sea Bream'' as an acceptable market name for 
                          Stenotomus chrysops.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2024

Mr. Magaziner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To establish ``Silver Sea Bream'' as an acceptable market name for 
                          Stenotomus chrysops.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SILVER SEA BREAM AS ACCEPTABLE MARKET NAME.

    A food shall not be treated as misbranded, adulterated, or 
otherwise in violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 
U.S.C. 301 et seq.) because the food is labeled or marketed using the 
name ``Silver Sea Bream'' for the species Stenotomus chrysops.
                                 <all>
```
Q3 2002 Exhibit 10.43





Exhibit 10.43




October 25, 2002


Via facsimile transmission to (925) 241-2403

               And by Federal Express to:


E-LOAN, Inc.

   5875 Arnold Road

   Dublin, CA 94568

   Attn: Steve Herz


Dear Mr. Herz:


Please consider this letter a Notice of Termination of the
Auto Loan Purchase and Sale Agreement (the "Agreement") dated June 5, 2000
between E-LOAN, Inc. (E-LOAN) and AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.
("AmeriCredit").  This termination is effective 30 days from the date of this
letter.



As you know, §6.21(i) of the Agreement provides in pertinent
part:



 6.2    Termination.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement may be
terminated as follows:


(i) without cause by either party after expiration of the
Initial Term, upon not less than thirty (30) days prior written  notice to the other party; 





Please be advised that the Confidentiality Provisions of the
Agreement survive termination of the Agreement.  I reiterate to you that
AmeriCredit considers any information related to its' (1) underwriting
guidelines, (2) program parameters, or (3) operations to be Confidential
Information that must not be shared with any current or future business
partner or E-LOAN.


Although the decision to terminate the agreement was based on
strategic and competitive reasons, AmeriCredit has enjoyed its partnership with
E-LOAN and wishes you and your employees continued success in your future
endeavors.


Sincerely,


AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.




Georgine Muntz

                   Senior Vice President - E-Services


c:Edward Giedgowd

     E-LOAN, Inc.

     5875 Arnold Road

     Dublin, CA 94568
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
unaudited financial statements contained in the company's Form 10-QSB and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                           <C>                       
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS       
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                        647,243             
<SECURITIES>                                  6                    
<RECEIVABLES>                                 306,239            
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0         
<INVENTORY>                                   0           
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              953,488           
<PP&E>                                        282,122            
<DEPRECIATION>                                0   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                1,247,552          
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         9,748            
<BONDS>                                       0           
<COMMON>                                      1,416,319                         
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0        
<PREFERRED>                                   0          
<OTHER-SE>                                    (178,515)                 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  1,247,552                 
<SALES>                                       0             
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              77,842              
<CGS>                                         0          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 0             
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              57,977            
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0          
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0                
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               19,865         
<INCOME-TAX>                                  4,400         
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           15,465            
<DISCONTINUED>                                0     
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0             
<CHANGES>                                     0                
<NET-INCOME>                                  15,465            
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 .01         
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .01       
                                                   

</TABLE>
§ 57.4131 Surface fan installations and mine openings. ( a ) On the surface, no more than one day's supply of combustible materials shall be stored within 100 feet of mine openings or within 100 feet of fan installations used for underground ventilation.
( b ) the one-day supply shall be kept at least 25 feet away from any mine opening except during transit into the mine.
( c ) Dry vegetation shall not be permitted within 25 feet of mine openings.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,056
<SECURITIES>                                     1,924
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,098
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,711
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               509,584
<PP&E>                                       1,756,461
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,341,767
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 993,865
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          435,094
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       206,713
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,984
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   993,865
<SALES>                                         28,095
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,991
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,741
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,655
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,405)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,405)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,405)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 581.22 Lease form.

The OCS mineral leases shall be issued on the lease form prescribed by the Secretary in the leasing notice.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 2, 2021

No. 04-20-00151-CV

John PORTERFIELD,

Appellant

v.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY,

Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18-366

Honorable Kirsten Cohoon, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee’s motion for rehearing was originally due on July 29, 2021, and appellee filed 

an unopposed motion requesting a thirty-day extension of that deadline. After consideration, we 

GRANT the motion and ORDER appellee to file its motion for rehearing by August 27, 2021. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.8.

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of August, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
#### Harry Litwin et al., Doing Business as Woodbourne Landscape Co., Respondents, v. Grand Central Apartments Inc., Appellant.

Motion by respondents for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, denied. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.