alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered July 24, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00365
- CR STEVEN WARE, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F18
- 76179
- R



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s July 23, 2019 second motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed on or before
A ugust 22, 2019 . If appellant’s brief is not filed by August 22, 2019, this appeal may be abated for the trial court to make findings in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 38.8.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial information.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000027673
<NAME> JOHNDEERECAPITALCORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             176
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,212
<ALLOWANCES>                                        86
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                              31
<DEPRECIATION>                                      15
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,371
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                          1,790
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           113
<OTHER-SE>                                         771
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,371
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   638
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       79
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    32
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 275
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    160
<INCOME-TAX>                                        56
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                103
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       103
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Director

Office of International Aviation

US Department of Transportation

400 Seventh Street SW

Room 6402

Washington DC 20590

USA

18th January 2013

Reciprocity Statement

This letter is to confirm that the Civil Aviation Directorate within Transport Malta will

grant, on the basis of reciprocity, the US air carries all rights included in the Air

Transport Agreement between the European Community and its Member States signed on

the 30th April 2007 and in force since the 30th March 2008.

Yours sincerely,

Ian Falzon

Director General for Civil Aviation
#### § 56.9330 Clearance for surface equipment.

Continuous clearance of at least 30 inches from the farthest projection of moving railroad equipment shall be provided on at least one side of the tracks at all locations where possible or the area shall be marked conspicuously.
Exhibit 10.263


                                 PROMISSORY NOTE
                                  (NO INTEREST)

$14,694.00                                                  Glendale, California
   June 29, 2000




     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Robert Basa (Payor") promises to pay in lawful money of
the United States of America to Pollution Research and Control Corp., a
California corporation ("Payee"), or order, at Glendale, California, the sum of
$14,694.00 Dollars from the date hereof on the unpaid principal payable in
installments of principal only in the sum of $50.00 Dollars commencing on July
15, 2000 and payable on the same day of each month thereafter until paid in
full.

     The unpaid principal may be prepaid without penalty. Each payment hereunder
shall be credited to the principal amount.

     If each installment under this note is not paid when due, the undersigned
shall pay all costs of collection thereof, including reasonable attorneys' fees,
whether or not suit or action is commenced to enforce payment of this note, and
Payee may, at its option, declare the entire amount of the then unpaid principal
immediately due and payable if such default is not cured within 10 days after
Payee provides the undersigned written notice of such default. The undersigned
hereby waives presentment, notice of dishonor and protest.

     This note is secured by shares of Payee's common stock, no par value (the
"Shares"), pursuant to a certain Stock Pledge Agreement, dated as of June 29,
2000 (the "Pledge Agreement").

     Upon the termination of employment of Payor as an employee of Payee for any
reason, the unpaid balance of this note shall be cancelled, and the pro rata
portion of Shares which then not fully paid for, shall be returned to Payee
pursuant to the terms of the Pledge Agreement.

                                            Payor:



                                            By:  /s/  Robert Basa
                                               --------------------------------
                                                      Robert Basa
§ 57.11051 Escape routes. Escape routes shall be— ( a ) Inspected at regular intervals and maintained in safe, travelable condition; and
( b ) Marked with conspicuous and easily read direction signs that clearly indicate the ways of escape.
**Exhibit 15.2**

 

 

 

**INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS’ REPORT**

 

The Board of Directors of

Abbey National plc

 

We have examined management’s assertion that Abbey National Plc (the “Servicer”) has complied as of and for the year ended 31 December 2007 for Holmes Financing (No. 9) plc, with the minimum servicing standards (attached as Appendix 1 to Exhibit 15.1) described in the attached Annual Compliance Certificate dated 11 April 2008. Management is responsible for compliance with those servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Servicer’s compliance based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Servicer’s compliance with its minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Servicer’s compliance with its minimum servicing standards.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Servicer complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended 31 December 2007 for Holmes Financing (No. 9) plc, is fairly stated, in all material respects based on the criteria in Appendix 1 to Exhibit 15.1. 

 

 

 

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Chartered Accountants and Registered Auditors

London, United Kingdom

11 April 2008
### §3244. Annual report on reporting requirements

#### (a) Annual report required

Not later than March 1 of each fiscal year, the Director of National Intelligence shall submit to the congressional intelligence committees, the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives a report detailing all congressionally mandated reporting requirements applicable to Office 1 of the Director of National Intelligence for the upcoming fiscal year.

#### (b) Contents

Each report submitted pursuant to subsection (a) shall include, for the fiscal year covered by the report and for each congressionally mandated reporting requirement detailed in the report:

(1) A description of the reporting requirement.

(2) A citation to the provision of law (or other source of congressional directive) imposing the reporting requirement.

(3) Whether the reporting requirement is recurring, conditional, or subject to a termination provision.

(4) Whether the Director recommends repealing or modifying the requirement.

#### (c) Form

Each report submitted pursuant to subsection (a) may be submitted in classified form.

(July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title XI, §1114, as added Pub. L. 118–31, div. G, title III, §7314(a), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 1031.)

1 So in original. Probably should be preceded by "the".
News Release                                            Exhibit A

Contact:                                Baker Hughes Incorporated
Gary R. Flaharty (713) 439-8039         P. O. Box 4740
gary.flaharty@bakerhughes.com           Houston, Texas 77210-4740

BHI Appoints Steve Finley as CFO 

May 21, 1999.   Houston, Texas - Baker Hughes Incorporated (BHI
- NYSE, PCX, EBS), announced today that G. Stephen Finley has 
been elected as Sr. Vice President-Finance & Administration and 
Chief Financial Officer.

Mr. Finley joined Baker Hughes in 1982, and served as Sr. Vice 
President & Chief Administrative Officer of BHI since 1995, Vice 
President & Chief Financial Officer for Baker Hughes Oilfield 
Operations from 1993-1995, Controller of BHI from 1987-1993, and 
Chief Financial Officer positions at the operating division 
level prior to that time.  

Max Lukens, Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer,
stated "Steve's strong operational background will greatly 
assist us as we move forward in the implementation of our 
strategies for the newly combined company."

Baker Hughes also announced that Eric L. Mattson, formerly Sr.
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and James W. Harris, 
formerly Vice President-Tax & Controller, have resigned from the 
Company to pursue other interests.

Baker Hughes is a leading supplier of reservoir-centered 
products, services and systems to the worldwide oil and gas 
industry and is a leading supplier of separation technologies to 
the worldwide process industries.

                              ********


                    NOT INTENDED FOR BENEFICIAL HOLDERS
### §3075. "Function" and "Department of Defense" defined

(a) As used in sections 3002, 3021, 3023, 3025, and 3073 of this title, the term "function" includes functions, powers, and duties.

(b) As used in this Act, the term "Department of Defense" shall be deemed to include the military departments of the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force, and all agencies created under title II of this Act.

(July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title III, §308, 61 Stat. 509; Aug. 10, 1949, ch. 412, §12(e), 63 Stat. 591; Pub. L. 116–92, div. E, title LXVII, §6742(b)(10), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2240.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Title II of this Act, referred to in subsec. (b), means title II of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, 61 Stat. 499. Section 201(d) of title II, which was formerly classified to section 408 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as section 3005 of this title, was repealed by Pub. L. 87–651, §307, Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 526. Section 201, enacted by Pub. L. 116–92, div. E, title LXVII, §6742(b)(6), 133 Stat. 2240, is classified to section 3005 of this title. Sections 205(c), 206(a), and 207(c) of title II, renumbered sections 205(b), 206, and 207 by Pub. L. 116–92, div. E, title LXVII, §6742(b)(7)–(9), 133 Stat. 2240, were formerly classified to section 409 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as section 3004 of this title. For complete classification of title II to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 410 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section, and to section 171n of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.

#### Amendments

2019—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–92 substituted "sections 3002, 3021, 3023, 3025, and 3073 of this title" for "this Act".

1949—Subsec. (b). Act Aug. 10, 1949, substituted definition of "Department of Defense" for definition of "budget program".
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                   400,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               400,000
<PP&E>                                       2,157,927
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,343,567
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,214,460
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       250,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     964,360
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,214,460
<SALES>                                          9,024
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,972
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,424
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,352)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,352)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,352)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 08/1/2014

FROM: Laura Farris/EPA Region 8

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

SUBJECT: Goal Computation Call with the State of Wyoming held on 07/18/2014

SUMMARY: 

EPA Headquarters and Region 8 staff discussed the computation of the State of Wyoming goal under the 

proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants on 07/18/2014. The Clean Power Plan for Existing 

Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES:

Wyoming:

Steve Dietrich

Melissa Meese

Brian Fern

Cole Anderson

Kimber Whitman

Marci Nordy

Dave Walker

Blair Bell

John Nurback

Laura Baird

EPA: R8

Laura Farris

EPA: OAP

Brian Fisher

James Crutchfield

Matt Clouse

Erika Wilson

Joe Bryson

EPA: OAQPS

Jan Cortelyou

Nate Topham

Kevin Culligan

ATTACHMENTS

Discussion Questions
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dionics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of the undersigneds knowledge, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                        |                                      
|----------------------- | -------------------------------------
|Dated:  August 13, 2010 | By:   /s/ Bernard L. Kravitz         
|                        | Bernard L. Kravitz,                  
|                        | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                        | (Principal Executive Officer)        
|                        |                                      
|                        |                                      
|Dated:  August 13, 2010 | By:   /s/ Bernard L. Kravitz         
|                        | Bernard L. Kravitz,                  
|                        | Principal Financial Officer          

































1
#### Donald B. Ritts, Appellant, v. James P. Wilmot, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term denying in part a motion by plaintiff for an examination of defendant and of Page Airways, Ine.) Present — Williams, P, J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and MeClusky, JJ.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

Hon. B. P. Jennings county Auditor Herddin

county Kount%e* Texas Dear Sir:

This:

will-aek of February 9, 1940, in of thle department the

Peaas Preainet and 2,500 OF rndre

popuUnited States Cemuu, ry RegistrationDiee Board ofHealth may more Eeegistretion a Primary Dletrfote,

RegistrationDiatclat

Report,where blrthe and deaths are registered in accordanoswith a City Ordlnanoenot in oonilictwith this Act, the City Clerk shall be the Looal Registrar of Rlrthe and Qeaths. Yit ia hereby deolered to be the duty otHon. E. P. Jennings, PageI2

the **JUStlC%** Or.thSP%%O@!in the **h3tiOt3 Or**  **the** Peace Precinct, and the Oitg Clerk or City Secretary in the oity of 2,500 or more population, to secure a ocmplete record ai eaah birth and death that occur6within their respectlve jurlsdiotlon6,and 16 requiredby this A&." The firat paragraph of Rula+Sa or aeotion e5 or the same Arti provides:

Vh.at eaoh looal registrar is hereby chargedwith the etrlat aad thorough eniorcenont or the provleiensof thfe f,ot(Rule8 %a55a; P. C., Art. 75la) in his regietration district, under the supervlaionand direotion of the state registrar. And he ahallmake au immediate report to the state regietrar of any viOl%tion of this l&w oomiw to his kaowledge; by observationor upon oompleint of any person, or otherwi6e.R Article 781a or thePenal Code provide5 penaltiea ror tiolatioae ot .the Vital statiatios Law. It pmvides In part:

*....or (e)being a looal registati,de-'. puty registrar, or subregistrar,shall fail, neglect, or refuse to petiorm his duty as required by this dot and by the 5.ustructtioa6, and direction of the atata registrar thereuad6r, shall be deemed guilty of'a misdemaaaor and upon conviction thereof shall for the l'lrst offense be fined not less than five dollars ($5.00)nor rare than rifty dollar8 ($sO.OO), and for ench subsequentofYen6e not less than ten dollnrn f$lO.OO)nor morethan one hundred dollaro (i&100.00), or be Imprisoned in the oounty jail notmore than sixty days, or be both fined and tiprieoned."
It is clearly 1mc11 irOB the above quoted artiale that it 16mandatory for a ju6tlceof the pea06 to sxeoute the duties trposed by the vltol ~t%ti6tia6 hW the Sam %6

### 773

Hon. B. P. Jennings,Page 

### 3

it **$6** hi6 duty to **6X66Ut6** is oharged. ell 

### otherlaw8with which he

We think It proper to here point out that the State Board of Health **is** given the right **and** authority to ocrablne

two ormore registrationdistricts under the above quotedRule 366, which, if 

### doneby the Board **would** relieve one of the local 

### registrar8from hi6 duties. This, howevex, 16 6 natter re6fing solelywithin the dieoretlon of the Board end in the absence of the earclee or euoh discretion 6 justiceat the peace i6 required to 6erve. Ycur6terytrnly 

### ATT03 o&RIu.OF'pIzXAS

I.A:AW
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Kevin Oliver, Respondent.

[835 NYS2d 308]—

Appeal by the People, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hollie, J.), dated June 9, 2006, as, after a hearing, granted that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, and that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence is denied.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the People raised the issue of the defendant’s standing to contest the search of his knapsack both in their motion papers and in their posthearing memorandum. On appeal, the sole issue raised by the People is the question of standing.

A defendant has the burden of establishing standing by showing a legitimate expectation of privacy *(see People v Ramirez-Portoreal,*88 NY2d 99, 108 [1996]). The People have the burden of demonstrating abandonment, which is the relinquishment of an expectation of privacy *(id.*at 110). A defendant abandons property when he voluntarily relinquishes possession in a “calculated decision” in response to police conduct *(id.).*

The People established that the defendant abandoned the knapsack when he left it on the floor of a crowded Chinese takeout restaurant and went outside to talk to the police. The defendant himself testified at the hearing that someone from the restaurant asked him what was going on, and he said “I think they [the police] [are] about to search.” Therefore he “purposefully] divest[ed]” himself of possession in a “calculated decision” to avoid a search *(id.).*His action was “intentional and voluntary as the product of considered judgment” *(id.).*
      *881Under the facts of this case, the defendant relinquished any expectation of privacy when he left the premises, leaving the knapsack unattended in a publicly accessible area *(see People v Murray,*256 AD2d 116, 118 [1998]).

Accordingly, the defendant had no standing to contest the search, and that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence should have been denied. Crane, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Dillon, JJ, concur. *[See*12 Misc 3d 1168(A), 2006 NY Slip Op 51104(U) (2006).]
#### § 56.20001 Intoxicating beverages and narcotics.

Intoxicating beverages and narcotics shall not be permitted or used in or around mines. Persons under the influence of alcohol or narcotics shall not be permitted on the job.