alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF IMPSAT CORPORATION AND ITS
SUBSIDIARIES AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          10,911
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,606
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,513
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,371
<PP&E>                                         264,458
<DEPRECIATION>                                 108,776
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 365,914
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          131,752
<BONDS>                                        159,532
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          125,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       100,793
<OTHER-SE>                                    (39,767) 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   365,914
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,153
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,182
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   693
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,785
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (459)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,635
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,363)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### §§9866 to 9869. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–382, title III, §391(w), Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 4025

Section 9866, Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §667, as added Pub. L. 101–501, title II, §207(a), Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1247, related to authorization of appropriations to carry out this subchapter.

A prior section 9866, Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §667, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 511, provided for technical assistance and training, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 101–501, title II, §204(b), Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1246.

Section 9867, Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §668, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 511; Pub. L. 99–425, title II, §201(b), Sept. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 967; Pub. L. 101–501, title II, §§201(2), 209, Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1243, 1248, related to special conditions on financial assistance.

Section 9868, Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §669, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 511, related to applicability of other provisions to administration of this subchapter.

Section 9869, Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §669A, as added Pub. L. 101–501, title II, §208, Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1248, related to participation of entities that receive funds under this subchapter in other Federal educational activities and programs.
EXHIBIT 21


                         LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

     The Partnership is a partner of the following joint ventures:
JMB/Piper Jaffray Tower Associates, a general partnership, which is a
partner in (i) OB Joint Venture II, a general partnership, which is a
partner of 222 South Ninth Street Limited Partnership, a limited partner-
ship, which holds title to the Piper Jaffray Tower office building in
Minneapolis, Minnesota, and (ii) OB Joint Venture, a general partnership,
which holds title to the land underlying the Piper Jaffray Tower office
building; JMB/Piper Jaffray Tower Associates II, a general partnership
which also is a partner in OB Joint Venture, a general partnership, which
holds title to the land underlying the Piper Jaffray Tower office building;
900 3rd Avenue Associates, a general partnership, which is a partner of
Progress Partners, a general partnership, which holds title to 900 Third
Avenue Building located in New York, New York; Maguire Thomas Partners -
South Tower, a limited liability company, which holds title to Wells Fargo
Center - IBM Tower located in Los Angeles, California; 260 Franklin Street
Associates, a general partnership, which holds title to the 260 Franklin
Street Building located in Boston, Massachusetts; C-C California Plaza
Partnership, a general partnership, which holds title to the California
Plaza office building in Walnut Creek, California; and JMB/NewPark
Associates, a general partnership, which is a partner in NewPark
Associates, a general partnership, which holds title to the NewPark Mall in
Newark, California.  Reference is made to the Notes for a description of
the terms of such venture partnerships.
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Simon Property Group, L.P. (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Simon, Chief Executive Officer of Simon Property Group, Inc., the sole
general partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/ David SimonDavid Simon
Chief Executive Officer
Simon Property Group, Inc.,
General Partner |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

November 14, 2002

31

---

QuickLinks
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3089 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,3-bis(4-Aminophenoxy)benzene 

(RODA). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2005 

Mr. HOBSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,3-bis(4- 

Aminophenoxy)benzene (RODA). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF SUSPENSION OF 

4 DUTY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.05.15 of sub6 chapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Sched7 ule of the United States, relating to 1,3-bis(4- 

8 aminophenoxy)benzene (CAS # 2479–46–1) is amended 

9 by striking 12/31/2006 and inserting 12/31/2009. 
2 

HR 3089 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

ELIZABETH ELTING, § 

 § No. 90, 2018 

 Petitioner Below, § 

 Appellant, § Court Below—Court of Chancery 

 § of the State of Delaware 

 v. § 

 § C.A. Nos. 9700 and 10449 

PHILIP R. SHAWE and SHIRLEY § 

SHAWE, § 

 § 

 Respondents Below, § 

 Appellees. § 

 Submitted: April 18, 2018 

 Decided: May 3, 2018 

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA, VAUGHN, SEITZ, and 

TRAYNOR, Justices, constituting the Court en Banc. 

ORDER 

 This 3rd day of May, 2018, after careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and 

the record on appeal, we find it evident that the final judgment of the Court of 

Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated in its 

Memorandum Opinion and Order dated February 15, 2018. The Chancellor rose 

above the unjustified personal attacks on his integrity, and patiently and thoroughly 

addressed each issue raised in this bitter dispute, including Elizabeth Elting’s 

objections to approval of the Sale Agreement. The Trustee also ably performed his 

duties under the same conditions. Under the standard of review approved in the Sale 
2 

Order, the Chancellor properly held that the Custodian did not abuse his discretion 

in connection with the sales process or the Terms of the Agreements. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of 

Chancery is AFFIRMED.1

 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Justice 

                                                            

1

 Justice Valihura concurs in the Chancellor’s approval of the Sale Agreement given that the 

Court’s February 13, 2017 affirmance of the Sale Order is now the law of the case; but she notes 

that she continues to adhere to the views expressed in her dissent to that Opinion.
§ 402.12 Evaluation of applications for grants and contracts. ( a ) *Grants.* ( 1 ) Each grant application will receive technical evaluations from Government and/or non-Government scientific or engineering personnel. Utilizing the criteria for evaluation identified in the applicable announcement, each reviewer will assign a technical score.
( 2 ) Grant applications with low technical ratings will be screened out, and the remaining grant applications will be rank-ordered by review panels.
( 3 ) USGS program officials will compile a single, consolidated rank-ordered list of the grant applications based on technical scoring, program needs and published priorities, and the available Federal funds.
( b ) *Contracts.* Proposals for contract awards will be evaluated by a USGS panel. Contracts will be awarded according to procedures contained in the FAR, the Department of the Interior Acquisition Regulation, and in acquisition policy releases issued by the Department and by the USGS.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 949 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to eliminate the general Medicaid 

funding limitations for territories of the United States, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. SABLAN (for himself, Mr. TORRES of New York, Ms. PLASKETT, Mr. 

TAKANO, Mr. VEASEY, Mr. TRONE, Mr. CASE, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, Ms. 

BONAMICI, Ms. MENG, Ms. LEE of California, Mrs. GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N, 

Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Mrs. RADEWAGEN, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. 

MOYLAN, Mr. GARCI ́A of Illinois, Ms. CHU, and Ms. NORTON) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to eliminate 

the general Medicaid funding limitations for territories 

of the United States, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Insular Area Medicaid 

5 Parity Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 949 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF GENERAL MEDICAID FUNDING 

2 LIMITATIONS (‘‘CAP’’) FOR TERRITORIES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1108 of the Social Secu4 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1308) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (f), in the matter preceding 

6 paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘subsection (g) and (h)’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘subsections (g), (h), and (i)’’; 

8 (2) in subsection (g)(2), in the matter pre9 ceding subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘and para10 graphs (3) and (5)’’ and inserting ‘‘, paragraphs (3) 

11 and (5), and subsection (i)’’; and 

12 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub13 section: 

14 ‘‘(i) SUNSET OF MEDICAID FUNDING LIMITA15 TIONS.—Subsections (f) and (g) shall not apply to Puerto 

16 Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, the Northern Mariana Is17 lands, and American Samoa beginning with fiscal year 

18 2023.’’. 

19 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

20 (1) Section 1902(j) of the Social Security Act 

21 (42 U.S.C. 1396a(j)) is amended by striking ‘‘, the 

22 limitation in section 1108(f),’’. 

23 (2) Section 1903(u) of the Social Security Act 

24 (42 U.S.C. 1396b(u)) is amended by striking para25 graph (4). 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 949 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply beginning with fiscal year 2023. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.908 What are the minimum structural fatigue design requirements?

(a) API RP 2A-WSD, Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms (as incorporated by reference in § 250.198), requires that the design fatigue life of each joint and member be twice the intended service life of the structure. When designing your platform, the following table provides minimum fatigue life safety factors for critical structural members and joints.

| If . . . | Then . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (1) There is sufficient structural redundancy to prevent catastrophic failure of the platform or structure under consideration, | The results of the fatigue analysis must indicate a minimum calculated life of twice the design life of the platform. |
| (2) There is not sufficient structural redundancy to prevent catastrophic failure of the platform or structure, | The results of a fatigue analysis must indicate a minimum calculated life or three times the design life of the platform. |
| (3) The desirable degree of redundancy is significantly reduced as a result of fatigue damage, | The results of a fatigue analysis must indicate a minimum calculated life of three times the design life of the platform. |

(b) The documents incorporated by reference in § 250.901 may require larger safety factors than indicated in paragraph (a) of this section for some key components. When the documents incorporated by reference require a larger safety factor than the chart in paragraph (a) of this section, the requirements of the incorporated document will prevail.

[76 FR 64462, Oct. 18, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 36150, June 6, 2016]
### §§387 to 391. Repealed. May 4, 1934, ch. 211, §1, 48 Stat. 663

Section 387, act Aug. 1, 1912, ch. 269, §1, 37 Stat. 242, related to limiting association placer-mining claims.

Section 388, act Aug. 1, 1912, ch. 269, §2, 37 Stat. 243, related to restrictions on power of attorney to locate placer-mining claims.

Section 389, act Aug. 1, 1912, ch. 269, §3, 37 Stat. 243, related to restrictions on placer locations.

Section 390, acts Aug. 1, 1912, ch. 269, §4, 37 Stat. 243; Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 442, 43 Stat. 1118, related to area and shape of placer claims.

Section 391, act Aug. 1, 1912, ch. 269, §5, 37 Stat. 243, related to placer locations in violation of law.

See, now, sections 35 to 37 of Title 30, Mineral Lands and Mining.
#### § 57.15005 Safety belts and lines.

Safety belts and lines shall be worn when persons work where there is danger of falling; a second person shall tend the lifeline when bins, tanks, or other dangerous areas are entered.
#### § 57.12036 Fuse removal or replacement.

Fuses shall not be removed or replaced by hand in an energized circuit, and they shall not otherwise be removed or replaced in an energized circuit unless equipment and techniques especially designed to prevent electrical shock are provided and used for such purpose.
#### GOVE, Appellant, v. BENTLEY, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

March 8, 1905.)

Action by George H. Gove against George H. Bentley. No opinion. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6524

ROY HORTON, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, via Janet Reno, United States Attorney General; GARLAND HORACE, Deputy United States Marshal, and/or John Doe, Deputy United States Marshal; GARY BARRETT, Deputy United States Marshal; DAVID SMITH, Deputy United States Marshal; JERRY TOOTHMAN, Lieutenant, FCI, Morgantown; V. L. LONDON, Unit Manager, FCI, Morgantown; BRENDA L. FUTTEN, Case Manager, FCI, Morgantown; DENNIS R. BIDWELL, Warden, FCI, Morgantown; G. L. INGRAM, Regional Director, Bureau of Prisons; KATHLEEN HAWKS, Director, Bureau of Prisons; JAMES M. POOL, d/b/a Law Offices of James M. Pool; JERRY JAKE HEDRICK, Chief Jail Administrator; TIMOTHY L. BOWEN, Chief Jail Administrator; JACK ROOP, Director WVA Regional Jail Authority; SERGEANT CASTO, Correctional Officer, Central Regional Jail; JAMES M. HAMRICK, Records Clerk, Central Regional Jail; NAOMIA NESTER, Nurse, Central Regional Jail; BETTYE SMELLS, Nurse, Central Regional Jail; KATHY MCCAULEY, Counselor,Northern Regional Jail; KEVIN GOOD, Correctional Officer/Hearing Of ficer; MARTIN P. SHEEHAN, d/b/a Sheehan, Nuggent, and Sheehan, Defendants - Appellees.2Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. W illiam M. Kidd, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-10-1) Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 17, 1997 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roy Horton, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversibleerror. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Horton v. United States , No. CA-97-10-1 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 6, 1997 and Mar. 7, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of NeoMedia  Technologies,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each
of the undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.


Date:    November 17, 2003       By: /s/ David A. Dodge
         -----------------           --------------------------
                                 Name: David A. Dodge
                                 Title: Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer,
                                        Controller


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.
#### § 57.11038 Entering a manway.

Before entering a manway where persons may be working or traveling, a warning shall be given by the person entering the manway and acknowledged by any person present in the manway.
### §7109. Review of criminal records

The Secretary may review the criminal record of each holder of a license or certificate of registry issued under this part who applies for renewal of that license or certificate of registry.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 540; Pub. L. 101–380, title IV, §4102(e)(1), Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 510.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 7109 | 46:22546:233 |

46:233

Section 7109 authorizes the Secretary to renew licenses and certificates of registry for additional 5 year periods.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Pub. L. 101–380 substituted "Review of criminal records" for "Renewal of licenses" in section catchline and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "A license issued under this part may be renewed for additional 5-year periods."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1990 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 101–380 applicable to incidents occurring after Aug. 18, 1990, see section 1020 of Pub. L. 101–380, set out as an Effective Date note under section 2701 of Title 33, Navigation and Navigable Waters.
```

[110th Congress Public Law 105]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ105.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 1021]]

Public Law 110-105
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
805 Main Street in Ferdinand, Indiana, as the ``Staff Sergeant David L. 
       Nord Post Office''. <<NOTE: Oct. 24, 2007 -  [H.R. 3106]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT DAVID L. NORD POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 805 Main Street in Ferdinand, Indiana, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Staff Sergeant David L. Nord Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Staff 
Sergeant David L. Nord Post Office''.

    Approved October 24, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3106 (S. 2023):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            Sept. 5, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 3, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9396 

To direct the Secretary of the Army to provide an annual briefing regarding 

the accountability of an Army commander to ensure the welfare of 

personnel under the jurisdiction of such commander. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 23, 2024 

Mr. ARRINGTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Army to provide an annual 

briefing regarding the accountability of an Army commander to ensure the welfare of personnel under the 

jurisdiction of such commander. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Smitty Check Act of 

5 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9396 IH

1 SEC. 2. ANNUAL BRIEFING ON THE ACCOUNTABILITY OF 

2 ARMY COMMANDERS TO ENSURE THE WEL3 FARE OF PERSONNEL UNDER THEIR JURIS4 DICTION. 

5 Not later than January 31, 2025, and annually there6 after, the Secretary of the Army shall provide to the Com7 mittees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of 

8 Representatives a briefing regarding— 

9 (1) how the Secretary has implemented guid10 ance issued on February 5, 2024, titled ‘‘Account11 ability and Welfare of Soldiers and DA Civilians’’ 

12 that restated and emphasized the policies of the 

13 Army regarding the responsibility of commanders to 

14 check on the health and welfare of personnel, par15 ticularly following an injury or significant medical 

16 incident; 

17 (2) whether such implementation includes a 

18 penalty for failure to follow such guidance; and 

19 (3) the methods the Secretary uses to ensure 

20 that appropriate medical protocols are followed. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS