alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §167c. Storage, withdrawal and transportation

#### (a) In general

If the Secretary provides helium storage, withdrawal, or transportation services to any person, the Secretary shall impose a fee on the person that accurately reflects the economic value of those services.

#### (b) Minimum fees

The fees charged under subsection (a) shall be not less than the amount required to reimburse the Secretary for the full costs of providing storage, withdrawal, or transportation services, including capital investments in upgrades and maintenance at the Federal Helium System.

#### (c) Schedule of fees

Prior to sale or auction under subsection (a), (b), or (c) of section 167d of this title, the Secretary shall annually publish a standardized schedule of fees that the Secretary will charge under this section.

#### (d) Treatment

All fees received by the Secretary under this section shall be credited to the Helium Production Fund established under section 167d(e) of this title.

#### (e) Storage and delivery

In accordance with this section, the Secretary shall—

(1) allow any person or qualified bidder to which crude helium is sold or auctioned under section 167d of this title to store helium in the Federal Helium Reserve; and

(2) establish a schedule for the transportation and delivery of helium using the Federal Helium System that—

(A) ensures timely delivery of helium auctioned pursuant to section 167d(b)(2) of this title;

(B) ensures timely delivery of helium acquired from the Secretary from the Federal Helium Reserve by means other than an auction under section 167d(b)(2) of this title, including nonallocated sales; and

(C) provides priority access to the Federal Helium Pipeline for in-kind sales for Federal users.

#### (f) New Pipeline access

The Secretary shall consider any applications for access to the Federal Helium Pipeline in a manner consistent with the schedule for phasing out commercial sales and disposition of assets pursuant to section 167d of this title.

(Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 426, §5, as added Pub. L. 86–777, §2, Sept. 13, 1960, 74 Stat. 920; amended Pub. L. 104–273, §3, Oct. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 3317; Pub. L. 113–40, §4, Oct. 2, 2013, 127 Stat. 535.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5 of act Mar. 3, 1925, authorized governmental cooperation with Department of the Interior to effectuate the purposes of this chapter and was classified to section 166 of this title, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 86–777.

#### Amendments

2013—Pub. L. 113–40 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to fees for storage, transportation, and withdrawal.

1996—Pub. L. 104–273 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to licensing for extraction, transportation, and sale of helium under Federal helium refining program, including provisions in subsec. (a) relating to rules and regulations, in subsec. (b) relating to terms, assignments, and revocations of licenses, in subsec. (c) relating to purpose of licenses, and in subsec. (d) relating to suspension of licenses and reacquisition of helium supplies in times of war or national emergency.
#### § 585.659-585.699 [Reserved]
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9605 

To provide that any foreign government official who engages in censorship 

of American speech is inadmissible and deportable. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 16, 2024 

Mr. ISSA (for himself and Ms. SALAZAR) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide that any foreign government official who engages 

in censorship of American speech is inadmissible and 

deportable. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Censors on our 

5 Shores Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INADMISSIBILITY AND DEPORTABILITY RELATED 

7 TO CENSORING SPEECH. 

8 (a) INADMISSIBILITY.—Section 212(a)(2) of the Im9 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(2)) is 

10 amended by adding at the end the following: 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9605 IH

1 ‘‘(J) CENSORSHIP.—Any alien who, while 

2 serving as a foreign government official, was re3 sponsible for or directly carried out, at any 

4 time, any act against a United States citizen lo5 cated in the United States that, if committed by 

6 a United States government official in the 

7 United States, would violate the First Amend8 ment to the Constitution of the United States, 

9 is inadmissible.’’. 

10 (b) DEPORTABILITY.—Section 237(a)(2) of the Im11 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)) is 

12 amended by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(G) CENSORSHIP.—Any alien who, while 

14 serving as a foreign government official, was re15 sponsible for or directly carried out, at any 

16 time, any act against a United States citizen lo17 cated in the United States that, if committed by 

18 a United States government official in the 

19 United States, would violate the First Amend20 ment to the Constitution of the United States, 

21 is deportable.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
# Patent

## Title
Glass nozzle array for an ink jet printer and method of forming same

## Abstract

In the same manner as described above, other copper salts are reduced to obtain desirable copper catalysts. For example, a solution of cupric nitrate is reduced with metallic zinc to give a desirable copper catalyst that is employed in the conversion of acrylonitrile to acrylamide.[.,.]. .Iadd.or .Iaddend.methacrylonitrile to methacrylamide .[.or pentanonitrile to pentanoamide..]..Iadd..

## Background
## Claims

1. In the process for converting an .[.aliphatic nitrile.]. .Iadd.olefinic nitrile of 3 to 6 carbon atoms .Iaddend.to the corresponding amide by reacting the nitrile with water in the presence of a catalyst, the improvement comprising conducting the reaction in the presence of a catalytic amount of copper prepared by reducing copper hydroxide or a copper salt.

2. The process of claim 1 wherein the catalyst is obtained from copper hydroxide or a copper salt having an anion containing nitrogen, sulfur or an organic carboxylic acid.

3. The process of claim 1 wherein the catalyst is obtained from copper nitrate, copper acetate, copper carbonate, copper oxalate, copper sulfide, copper chloride or copper hydroxide.

4. The process of claim 1 wherein the catalyst is obtained from copper nitrate, copper acetate or copper oxalate.

5. The process of claim 1 wherein the catalyst is prepared by a hydrogen reduction .Iadd.of copper nitrate, copper acetate, copper carbonate, copper hydroxide or copper oxalate .Iaddend.at a temperature of about 50.degree. to about 500.degree. C.

6. The process of claim 5 wherein the temperature is about 150.degree. to about 350.degree. C.

7. The process of claim 1 wherein the copper hydroxide or copper salt is reduced with NaBH.sub.4 or hydrazine in the liquid phase.

8. The process of claim 1 wherein the reducing agent is an active metal. .[.9. The process of claim 1 wherein the nitrile is an olefinic nitrile of three to six cabron atoms..]. 10. The process of claim 1 wherein the nitrile is acrylonitrile.
Appeal No. 76-323.

#### Jacento Rosa and Maria F. Rosa *v.*John Oliveira.

*Gerard DeCelles, James D. Levitt,*for petitioner.

*John Oliveira,*pro se, defendant.

The defendant’s motion for an extension of time to file his brief is granted. Said brief shall be filed on or before August 19, 1977. This is positively the last extension which will be 'granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                      12,195,612
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               43,461,585
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,305,581
<INVENTORY>                                 11,704,428
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            75,067,577
<PP&E>                                      49,810,432
<DEPRECIATION>                              22,755,583
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             111,529,501
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,601,063
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,347
<OTHER-SE>                                  82,557,649
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               111,529,501
<SALES>                                    136,904,131
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           136,904,131
<CGS>                                       54,191,257
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               54,191,257
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               937,588
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             352,888
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             28,795,596
<INCOME-TAX>                                 8,602,680
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         20,192,916
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                20,192,916
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .68


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9444 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9444

 To amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 
 1992 to authorize appropriations for the Salton Sea Research Project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 30, 2024

   Mr. Ruiz introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 
 1992 to authorize appropriations for the Salton Sea Research Project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 1101(e) of the Reclamation Projects Authorization and 
Adjustment Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-575; 106 Stat. 4661(e)) is 
amended by striking ``$13,000,000'' and inserting ``$300,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-10234 Conference Calendar

JUAN RAMON MARTINEZ, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus L. E. FLEMING, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:01-CV-826-A

-------------------- October 30, 2002 Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Juan Ramon Martinez, federal prisoner #04139-030, appeals from the denial of his petition seeking relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The district court held, because Martinez was challenging the legality of his conviction, his claim must be raised in a motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and that Martinez had failed to show that the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 was applicable. A prior unsuccessful 28 U.S.C. § 2255No. 02-10234 -2- motion does not render that remedy inadequate or ineffective.
See Tolliver v. Dobre , 211 F.3d 876, 878 (5th Cir. 2000). Martinez has failed to show on appeal that he is entitled to application of the savings clause. Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
#### Florence B. Williams, Respondent, v. Nelson I. Williams, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to either party and a new trial granted. Memorandum: There was no evidence produced sufficient to sustain the finding of the trial court. (Appeal from a judgment of Erie Trial Term granting plaintiff a separation and directing payment for support and maintenance.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Noonan, JJ.
Exhibit 23.3











CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective Amendment No. 13 to the Registration Statement on Form S-14 (File No. 2-96149) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-199694) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-28631, 33-10218, 33-13210, 33-14561, 33-48781, 33-59109, 333-43478, 333-43484, 333-128494, 333-139523, 333-148070, 333-156188, 333-167516, 333-170185, 333-204477 and 333-209701) of Altria Group, Inc. of our report dated March 22, 2017, relating to the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, of Ambev S.A. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV for the  year ended December 31, 2016, which is incorporated by reference into this Amendment No. 1 to Altria Group, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.  The consolidated financial statements of the Company are not separately presented in Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV’s Annual Report on Form 20-F.





São Paulo, Brazil,





June 15, 2017





/s/ DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU


Auditores Independentes
|    |                                                                                               |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this amendment no. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Altria Group, Inc.; |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
|   | /s/ HOWARD A. WILLARD III |
|   | Howard A. Willard III |
|   | Executive Vice President and |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

November 1, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00620

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.L. ET AL., CHILDREN,

From the 25th Judicial Distr ict Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16

- 2158

- CV Honorable Thomas Nathaniel Stuckey, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The appellant ’ s motion for extension of time to file their brief is granted. The appellant ’ s brief is due on November 20 , 2017

.

________________________ _________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 1st day of November, 2017

.

____________________ _______________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of IMCOR Pharmaceutical Co. (the “company”)on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, TaffyJ. Williams, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the company.

 

 
| /s/  Taffy J. Williams    |    |
|---------------------------|---------|
| Taffy  J. Williams, Ph.D. |
| Chief  Executive Officer  |
| April  13                 | ,  2004 |
|                           |         |  |

 

----
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

Fluid Filtration Manufacturing Corp. ) ASBCA No. 63241

)

Under Contract No. SPMYM4

- 19

- P

- 0423 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT : Christopher S. Young, Esq.

Erin D. Brooks, Esq.

Business & Technology Law Group

Columbia, MD

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Daniel K. Poling, Esq.

DLA Chief Trial Attorney

Julie K. Phillips, Esq.

Trial Attorney

DLA Land and Maritime

Columbus, OH

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: October 27, 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63241

, Appeal of Fluid Filtration

Manufacturing Corp. , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: October 28, 2022 CHRISTOPHER M. MCNULTY

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
EXHIBIT 13.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of RADA Electronic Industries Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Adar Azancot , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Adar Azancot *
------------------
Adar Azancot
Chief Executive Officer

March 30, 2006


     * The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at
the Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
Exhibit 32.1





Section 1350 Certification



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as amended, of Omega Commercial Finance Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned Todd Buxton, Chief Executive Officer and Jon S. Cummings, IV, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge:



1.  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |                                    
|--------------------- | -----------------------------------
|Date: August 17, 2015 | /s/ Todd Buxton                    
|                      | Todd Buxton Chief Executive Officer



|                      |                                                                                         
|--------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 17, 2015 | /s/ Jon S. Cummings, IV                                                                 
|                      | Jon S. Cummings, IV Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)
### §7. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act June 23, 1879, ch. 35, §1, 21 Stat. 31, was dependent upon and incorporated by reference in sections 1 to 6 and 8 of this title which were repealed by act July 16, 1947, ch. 256, §1, 61 Stat. 327.
### §51511. Midshipman status in the Navy Reserve

A citizen of the United States attending a State maritime academy may be appointed by the Secretary of the Navy as a midshipman in the Navy Reserve (including the Merchant Marine Reserve, Navy Reserve).

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(b), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1582; Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title V, §515(g)(2), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3236; Pub. L. 110–181, div. C, title XXXV, §3523(a)(1), (b), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 598, 600.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 51511 | 46 App.:1295c(h). | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title XIII, §1304(h), as added Pub. L. 96–453, §2, Oct. 15, 1980, 94 Stat. 2006. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–181, §3523(b), repealed Pub. L. 109–163, §515(g)(2). See 2006 Amendment note below.

Pub. L. 110–181, §3523(a)(1), incorporated the substance of the amendment by Pub. L. 109–163, §515(g)(2), into this section by substituting "Navy Reserve" for "Naval Reserve" wherever appearing in section catchline and text. See 2006 Amendment note below and section 18(a) of Pub. L. 109–304, set out as a Legislative Purpose and Construction note preceding section 101 of this title.

2006—Pub. L. 109–163, §515(g)(2), which directed the amendment of section 1295c of the former Appendix to this title from which this section was derived, was repealed by Pub. L. 110–181, §3523(b). See 2008 Amendment notes and Historical and Revision notes above.