alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Shannon *vs.*Daniel.

0'n *certiorari*from the county court, where the judgment is reversed, the case should be remanded for a new trial if questions of fact are involved.

Warner, Chief Justice.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dionics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of the undersigneds knowledge, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated:   August 12, 2008

By:

/s/ Bernard Kravitz

Bernard Kravitz,

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)





Dated:   August 12, 2008

By:

/s/ Bernard Kravitz

Bernard Kravitz,

Principal Financial Officer
#### § 56.12066 Guarding trolley wires and bare powerlines.

Where metallic tools or equipment can come in contact with trolley wires or bare powerlines, the lines shall be guarded or deenergized.
Honorable Zollie Steakley OpinionNo. Ww-803

Secretary of State Capitol Station Re: Authority of the Secretary Austin, Texas of State to accept and file proposed Articles of Incorporation containing the clause that the purpose of the corporation is "to support and make contributions to any religious, charitable, scientific or educational Dear Mr. Steakley: undertaking or organization."

You have requested an opinion on the following questions: "The opinion of your office is

respectfullyrequested concerning the authority of this office to accept and file the charter of a proposed nonprofit corporation containinga purpose clause stated generally as follows: "'Thepurpose for which the'corporation is organized is to support and make contributions to any religious, charitable, scientific or educationalundertaking or organization.' I,

. . . "1. Should the Secretary of State accept and file the proposed Articles of Incorporationwith the general purpose clause stated above? "2. If QuestionNo. 1 is answered in the affirmative, should the SecretaryHonorable Zollie Steakley,page 2 (w-803).

of State require an elaboration or a detailed statementas to themanner in which the corporationwill engage in or carry out its authorizedpurposes In order to determinewhether the corporation is exempt from franchise taxes?" SubdivisionA of Article 2.01, Texas Non-Profit CorporationAct (HouseBill 145, Azts of the 56th Legislature, Regular Session, 1959, Chapter 162, page 286, provides in part:

"A. Except as hereinafter in this Article expressly excludedherefrom, nonprofit corporationsmay be organizedunder

It is noted that the purpose stated in the Articles of Incorporation submittedwith your request is for specific purposes named in the Act and, therefore, statesa lawful purpose. It is, therefore, our opinion that you are authorized to accept and file the Articles of Incorporation.

In answer to your second question,you are authorized to require such informatlonas is necessary for you to determinewhether the corporation is exempt from franchise taxes.

SUMMARY

The Secretary of State is authorized to accept and file proposed Articles of Incorporationcontaining the clauseHonorable Zollie Steakley,page 3 (~~-803).

that its purpose is "to supportand make contributionsto any religious, charitable, scientificor educational undertaking or organization,"as this clause constitutesa full statement of the purpose of the corporationas requiredby Article 2.01.of the Texas Non-Profit CorporationAct. Yours very truly, WILL WILSON Attorney General of Texas

Assistant JR:mfh APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE W. V. Geppert, Chairman Charles D. Cabaniss Tom I. McFarling 5. Arthur Sandlin REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: Leonard Passmore
#### § 57.19072 Skips and cages in same compartment.

When combinations of cages and skips are used in the same compartment, the cages shall be enclosed to protect personnel from flying material and the hoist speed reduced to man-speed as defined in standard 57.19061, but not to exceed 1,000 feet per minute. Muck shall not be hoisted with personnel during shift changes.
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


         This First Amendment to Employment Agreement is made as of this 4th day
of March, 2002, by and between Checkpoint Systems, Inc. ("CSI") and John Davies
("Executive").

         WHEREAS, CSI and Executive are parties to an Employment Agreement
dated March 20, 2001 ("Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend such Agreement as set forth herein;

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual promises and
covenants contained herein and intending to be legally bound thereby, the
parties agree as follows:

          1.   Article 1.  Employment and Term is hereby amended by changing the
               Executive's title to Executive Vice President.

          2.   Article 3.A  Compensation is hereby amended by changing the "Base
               Salary" to $250,000.

          3.   Article 5.  Termination is hereby amended by changing  Article 5C
               and 5E so that the twelve  (12) month  period  contained  therein
               shall now be read as eighteen (18) months.

          4.   All other terms of the Agreement shall remain the same.


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this First Amendment to be
executed as of the date first above written.

           CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.

         BY:  /s/ Michael E. Smith    BY:  /s/ John Davies, Jr.
              --------------------         --------------------
              President and Chief           John Davies
              Executive Officer
### §2357e. Confidentiality of information

Information which has been submitted to or received by the coordination mechanism established pursuant to section 2357b of this title in confidence shall not be publicly disclosed, except to the extent required by law, and such information shall be used by it only for the purpose of carrying out the functions set forth in this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 107–228, div. B, title XIII, §1337, Sept. 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 1451.)
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACTAPPEALS Application Under the Equal Access

to Justice Act

-- KBJ, Inc. Under ContractNo. NNCl 1CA18C APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 58512
Joseph R. Spoonster, Esq.

Harpst Ross, Ltd. Uniontown, OH Scott W. Barber, Esq.

NASA ChiefTrial Attorney Tamika S. Laldee, Esq. Laura A. Henry, Esq.

Trial Attorneys NASA Glenn Research Center, OH ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Board has received appellant's request dated 1June 2016 that its Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) application be withdrawn due to settlement. Accordingly, the EAJA application is hereby withdrawn from the Board's docket and is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 2 June 2016

ministrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals on an application for fees and otherexpenses incurred in connection with ASBCANo. 58512, Appeal ofKBJ, Inc., rendered in accordance with 5 U.S.C. § 504. Dated:
JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
#### In the Matter of William S. Terry, Petitioner, v New York State Comptroller et al., Respondents.

[835 NYS2d 484]—

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Comptroller which denied petitioner’s application for accidental disability retirement benefits.

Petitioner, a police office with the Nassau County Police Department, injured his knees and wrists while on duty when his patrol car was hit from the side by a car which had gone through a red light. Petitioner’s application for accidental disability retirement benefits was initially denied, and he requested a hearing and redetermination. The Hearing Officer denied the application and respondent Comptroller adopted the Hearing Officer’s findings. Petitioner then initiated this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. To receive accidental disability retirement benefits, a petitioner has the burden to establish that he or she is permanently incapacitated from performing his or her regular job duties *(see Matter of Scheuring v New York State Comptroller,*32 AD3d 1127 [2006]). Further, the Comptroller has the *1117authority to resolve conflicts in medical testimony, “so long as the credited expert provides an articulated, rational and fact-based opinion, founded upon a physical examination and review of relevant medical reports and records” *(Matter of Kosilla v Hevesi,*25 AD3d 870, 871 [2006], quoting *Matter of Regan v New York State & Local Employees’ Retirement Sys.,*14 AD3d 927, 928 [2005], *lv denied*4 NY3d 709 [2005]).

The orthopedist who testified on behalf of the New York State and Local Retirement System, after a physical examination of petitioner and review of his medical records, found that petitioner was not permanently disabled from the performance of his duties as a police officer. While petitioner presented medical evidence of disability, none established whether any such disability was permanent. It is apparent from a review of the Hearing Officer’s decision that he considered all the medical evidence and resolved any conflicts in favor of the Retirement System *(see Matter of Vassello v McCall,*296 AD2d 815, 816 [2002]). We conclude that the determination is supported by substantial evidence in the record *(see Matter of De Filippo v Hevesi,*32 AD3d 652 [2006]; *Matter of Scheuring v New York State Comptroller, supra),*and must therefore be confirmed.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Donald Hicks, Appellant.

Motion to enlarge time granted; appellant to perfect the appeal for the November 1960 Term, beginning October 31, 1960, for which term the appeal is ordered to be placed on the calendar. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
§ 550.231 After receiving the EP, what will BOEM do? ( a ) *Determine whether deemed submitted.* Within 15 working days after receiving your proposed EP and its accompanying information, the Regional Supervisor will review your submission and deem your EP submitted if: ( 1 ) The submitted information, including the information that must accompany the EP (refer to the list in § 550.212), fulfills requirements and is sufficiently accurate;
( 2 ) You have provided all needed additional information (see § 550.201(b)); and
( 3 ) You have provided the required number of copies (see § 550.206(a)).
( b ) *Identify problems and deficiencies.* If the Regional Supervisor determines that you have not met one or more of the conditions in paragraph (a) of this section, the Regional Supervisor will notify you of the problem or deficiency within 15 working days after the Regional Supervisor receives your EP and its accompanying information. The Regional Supervisor will not deem your EP submitted until you have corrected all problems or deficiencies identified in the notice.
( c ) *Deemed submitted notification.* The Regional Supervisor will notify you when the EP is deemed submitted.
### **CHAPTER 2—THE SEAL**

Sec.
41.
Seal of the United States.
42.
Same; custody and use of.
EXHIBIT 32.1




WRITTEN STATEMENT


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cogo Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Jeffrey Kang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





August 10, 2011
By:
/s/ Jeffrey KangName:  Jeffrey KangTitle:  Chief Executive Officer
### §3054. POW/MIA analytic capability

#### (a) Requirement

(1) The Director of National Intelligence shall, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, establish and maintain in the intelligence community an analytic capability with responsibility for intelligence in support of the activities of the United States relating to individuals who, after December 31, 1990, are unaccounted for United States personnel.

(2) The analytic capability maintained under paragraph (1) shall be known as the "POW/MIA analytic capability of the intelligence community".

#### (b) Unaccounted for United States personnel

In this section, the term "unaccounted for United States personnel" means the following:

(1) Any missing person (as that term is defined in section 1513(1) of title 10).

(2) Any United States national who was killed while engaged in activities on behalf of the United States and whose remains have not been repatriated to the United States.

(July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title I, §117, as added Pub. L. 106–567, title III, §307(a), Dec. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 2839; amended Pub. L. 108–458, title I, §1071(a)(1)(T), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3689.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 404l of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

2004—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 108–458 substituted "Director of National Intelligence" for "Director of Central Intelligence".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2004 Amendment

For Determination by President that amendment by Pub. L. 108–458 take effect on Apr. 21, 2005, see Memorandum of President of the United States, Apr. 21, 2005, 70 F.R. 23925, set out as a note under section 3001 of this title.

Amendment by Pub. L. 108–458 effective not later than six months after Dec. 17, 2004, except as otherwise expressly provided, see section 1097(a) of Pub. L. 108–458, set out in an Effective Date of 2004 Amendment; Transition Provisions note under section 3001 of this title.
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                     FORM 15


CERTIFICATION  AND NOTICE OF TERMINATION OF REGISTRATION  UNDER SECTION 12(g) OF
THE SECURITIES  EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR SUSPENSION OF DUTY TO FILE REPORTS UNDER
SECTIONS 13 AND 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.


                         Commission File Number  33-99598


                       STRUCTURED ASSET SECURITIES CORPORATION
 (as depositor under the Trust Agreement, dated as of April 1, 1996, providing 
    for the issuance of Structured Asset Securities Corporation Mortgage 
            Pass-Through Certificates, Series GreenPoint 1996-A)
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


    Three World Financial Center, 200 Vesey St., New York, New York, 10022 
                              (212) 526-5594
   (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of
                   registrant's principal executive offices)

   Structured Asset Securities Corporation Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, 
                            Series GreenPoint 1996-A
            (Title of each class of securities covered by this Form)


                                      None
       (Titles of all other classes of securities for which a duty to file
                  reports under section 13(a) or 15(d) remains)


    Please  place  an X in  the  box(es)  to  designate,  the  appropriate  rule
provision(s) relied upon to terminate or suspend the duty to file reports:

  Rule 12g-4(a)(1)(i)                                 Rule 12h-3(b)(1)(i)     x
  Rule 12g-4(a)(1)(ii)                                Rule 12h-3(b)(1)(ii)
  Rule 12g-4(a)(2)(i)                                 Rule 12h-3(b)(2)(i)
  Rule 12g-4(a)(2)(ii)                                Rule 12h-3(b)(2)(ii)
                                                      Rule 15d-6

    Approximate  number of holders of record as of the  certification  or notice
date:  3

    Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Issuer
of the Structured Asset Securities Corporation Mortgage Pass-Through 
Certificates, Series GreenPoint 1996-A, has caused this certification/notice to 
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned duly authorized person.

Date:  April 15, 1997              By: /s/ Prue Larocca

                                        Prue Larocca, Vice President
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTransonic Shock Oscillations and Wing Flutter Calculated with an Interactive Boundary Layer Coupling MethodA viscous-inviscid interactive coupling method is used for the computation of unsteady transonic flows involving separation and reattachment. A lag-entrainment integral boundary layer method is used with the transonic small disturbance potential equation in the CAP-TSDV (Computational Aeroelasticity Program - Transonic Small Disturbance) code. Efficient and robust computations of steady and unsteady separated flows, including steady separation bubbles and self-excited shock-induced oscillations are presented. The buffet onset boundary for the NACA 0012 airfoil is accurately predicted and shown computationally to be a Hopf bifurcation. Shock-induced oscillations are also presented for the 18 percent circular arc airfoil. The oscillation onset boundaries and frequencies are accurately predicted, as is the experimentally observed hysteresis of the oscillations with Mach number. This latter stability boundary is identified as a jump phenomenon. Transonic wing flutter boundaries are also shown for a thin swept wing and for a typical business jet wing, illustrating viscous effects on flutter and the effect of separation onset on the wing response at flutter. Calculations for both wings show limit cycle oscillations at transonic speeds in the vicinity of minimum flutter speed indices.Document ID19960054470Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsEdwards, John W.*(NASA Hampton, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1996Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:110484NASA-TM-110484Meeting InformationMeeting: EUROMECH-Colloquium: Simulation of Fluid-Structure Interaction in AeronauticsLocation: GottingenCountry: GermanyStart Date: September 16, 1996End Date: September 19, 1996Accession Number96N36616Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19960054470.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### GITLER et al., Respondents, v. RUSSIAN CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 20, 1903.)

Action by Abraham Gitler and another against Russian Co. for Sea, etc., Ins. J. L. Bernstein, for appellant. A. D. Lind, for respondents.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Appeal from order denying motion for reargument dismissed.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9481 

To establish the Northern Border Coordination Center, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 6, 2024 

Mr. PAPPAS (for himself, Ms. TENNEY, and Mr. MOLINARO) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To establish the Northern Border Coordination Center, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving Coordina5 tion for the Northern Border Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NORTHERN BORDER COORDINATION CENTER. 

7 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than one year after 

8 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 

9 establish the Northern Border Coordination Center. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9481 IH

1 (b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the Center shall be 

2 to serve as the Department’s forward deployed centralized 

3 coordination center for operations, domain awareness, in4 formation sharing, intelligence, training, and stakeholder 

5 engagement with Federal, State, Tribal, local, and inter6 national government partners along the northern border 

7 of the United States. The Center shall be placed along 

8 the northern border at a location that is collocated with 

9 an existing U.S. Border Patrol sector headquarters, Air 

10 and Marine Operations branch, and United States Coast 

11 Guard air station, and other facility at which Department 

12 activities are carried out. 

13 (c) FUNCTIONS.—The Center shall perform the func14 tions described in this subsection in addition to any other 

15 functions assigned by the Secretary. 

16 (1) NORTHERN BORDER STRATEGY.—The Cen17 ter, in collaboration with relevant offices and compo18 nents of the Department, shall— 

19 (A) serve as a coordination mechanism for 

20 operational components for the implementation, 

21 evaluation, and updating of the Northern Bor22 der Strategy and any successor strategy; and 

23 (B) support the development of best prac24 tices and policies for personnel along the north25 ern border to support such implementation. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 9481 IH

1 (2) TRAINING.—The Center shall serve as a 

2 training location to support the delivery of training 

3 or exercises for Department personnel and Federal, 

4 State, Tribal, local, and international government 

5 partners. 

6 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

7 (1) CENTER.—The term ‘‘Center’’ means the 

8 Northern Border Coordination Center established 

9 pursuant to subsection (a). 

10 (2) DEPARTMENT.—The term ‘‘Department’’ 

11 means the Department of Homeland Security. 

12 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

13 the Secretary of Homeland Security. 

14 (e) LIMITATION.—The Center established pursuant 

15 to subsection (a) shall be established separate and distinct 

16 from the Secretary’s authorities under section 708 of the 

17 Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 348). 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS