alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment of Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.48 
  
 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 This AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
(“Amendment”), effective as of October 21, 2002, is made by and between Deltagen, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Michael T. Sember, the undersigned individual (“Executive”). 
  
 RECITAL 
  
 The Company and Executive desire to modify the Employment Agreement (“Employment Agreement”) into which they entered effective April 22, 2002. The Company’s signatory to this Amendment represents that he is authorized
by the Board of Directors to enter into this Amendment on behalf of The Company. 
  
 AGREEMENT 

 
 NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the Company and Executive agree that the Employment Agreement between The
Company and Executive, effective April 22, 2002, shall be and hereby is amended as follows: 
  
 Paragraph 1(a) of the
Employment Agreement currently provides that “In addition, the Board of Directors will appoint you to the Board within six months of your commencement of employment.” The Company and Executive agree that this provision shall be amended to
read as follows: “In addition, the Board of Directors will appoint you to the Board effective December 31, 2002.” 
  
 The Company and Executive further agree that this Amendment shall not change, modify or amend any other provision of the Employment Agreement. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment as of the dates set forth below. 
  
 
	 DELTAGEN, INC.
 	 	  	 	 EXECUTIVE:
 
	 
	 By:
 	 	 /s/    WILLIAM MATTHEWS
 
	 	  	 	 By:
 	 	 /s/    MICHAEL T. SEMBER
 

	 Name:
 	 	 William Matthews
 	 	  	 	 Name:
 	 	 Michael T. Sember
 
	 Title:
 	 	 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 	 	  	 	 Title:
 	 	 President and Chief Operating Officer
 
	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  
	 Date:
 	 	 October 21, 2002
 
	 	  	 	 Date:
 	 	 October 21, 2002
**Exhibit 15**

November 8, 2005

TheBoard of Directors

CreditSuisse First Boston (USA), Inc.

New York, New York

Re: Registration statements No. 333-116241,333-86720, 333-71850, 333-62422, 333-07657, 333-34149,333-53499, 333-73405 and 333-30928

With respect to the subject registration statements,we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated November 8,2005 related to our review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of1933 (the “Act”), such report is not considered part of a registrationstatement prepared or certified by an independent registered public accountingfirm, or a report prepared or certified by an independent registered publicaccounting firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

| /s/ KPMG LLP        |   |   |
|---------------------|--------|--------|
| New York, New  York |   |   |

 

----
§ 580.73 Will BOEM share data and information with coastal States? ( a ) We can disclose proprietary data, information, and samples submitted to us by permittees or third parties that we receive under this part to the Governor of any adjacent State that requests it according to paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section. The permittee or third parties who submitted proprietary data, information, and samples will be notified about the disclosure and will have at least five working days to comment on the action.
( b ) We will make a disclosure under this section only after the Governor and the Secretary have entered into an agreement containing all of the following provisions: ( 1 ) The confidentiality of the information will be maintained.
( 2 ) In any action taken for failure to protect the confidentiality of proprietary information, neither the Federal Government nor the State may raise as a defense: ( i ) Any claim of sovereign immunity; or
( ii ) Any claim that the employee who revealed the proprietary information was acting outside the scope of his/her employment in revealing the information.
( 3 ) The State agrees to hold the Federal Government harmless for any violation by the State or its employees or contractors of the agreement to protect the confidentiality of proprietary data and information and samples.
( 4 ) The materials containing the proprietary data, information, and samples will remain the property of the Federal Government.
( c ) The data, information, and samples available for reproduction to the State(s) under an agreement must be related to leased lands. Data and information on unleased lands may be viewed but not copied or reproduced.
( d ) The State must return to us the materials containing the proprietary data, information, and samples when we ask for them or when the State no longer needs them.
( e ) Information received and knowledge gained by a State official under paragraph (d) of this section is subject to confidentiality requirements of: ( 1 ) The Act; and
( 2 ) The regulations at 30 CFR parts 580, 581, and 582.
### **CHAPTER 21—ABACÁ PRODUCTION**
#### § 556.106 Service fees.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70493, Aug. 30, 2024.

(a) The table in this paragraph (a) shows the fees you must pay to BOEM for the services listed. BOEM will adjust the fees periodically according to the Implicit Price Deflator for Gross Domestic Product and publish a document showing the adjustment in the Federal Register. If a significant adjustment is needed to arrive at a new fee for any reason other than inflation, then a proposed rule containing the new fees will be published in the Federal Register for comment.

| Service—processing of the following: | Fee amount | 30 CFR citation |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (1) Assignment of record title interest in Federal oil and gas lease(s) for BOEM approval | $234 | § 556.701(a). |
| (2) Sublease or Assignment of operating rights interest in Federal oil and gas lease(s) for BOEM approval | 234 | § 556.801(a). |
| (3) Required document filing for record purpose, but not for BOEM approval | 34 | § 556.715(a)
§ 556.808(a). |
| (4) Non-required document filing for record purposes | 34 | § 556.715(b)
§ 556.808(b). |

Service Fee Table

(b) Evidence of payment via *pay.gov* of the fees listed in paragraph (a) of this section must accompany the submission of a document for approval or filing, or be sent to an office identified by the Regional Director.

(c) Once a fee is paid, it is nonrefundable, even if your service request is withdrawn.

(d) If your request is returned to you as incomplete, you are not required to submit a new fee with the amended submission.

(e) The *pay.gov* Web site is accessible at *https://www.pay.gov/paygov/* or through the BOEM Web site at *http://www.boem.gov/Fees-for-Services*.

(f) The fees listed in the table above apply equally to any document or information submitted electronically pursuant to part 560, subpart E, of this chapter.

[81 FR 18152, Mar. 30, 2016, as amended at 87 FR 52446, Aug. 26, 2022]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-1210

TAMMY J. SHAW; KGS, minor by her next friend; CAS, minor by 

her next friend; CJS, minor by her next friend, 

 Plaintiffs - Appellants, 

 v. 

LYNCHBURG DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; BOB MCDONNELL, 

State Attorney General; ELEANOR DUNN, Deputy City Attorney; 

TIM KAINE; SALLY BARCA; LISA PARKS; DR. A. J. ANDERSON; 

INVESTIGATOR ROBERT W. MOORE, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District 

Judge. (6:08-cv-00022-nkm-mfu) 

Submitted: September 15, 2009 Decided: September 22, 2009 

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Tammy J. Shaw, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander W. Bell, BELL & 

SCHNEIDER, PLC, Lynchburg, Virginia; Paul Kugelman, Jr., OFFICE 

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Nora 

Beth Dorsey, Daniel M. Kincheloe, Jodi Beth Simopoulos, HANCOCK, 

DANIEL, JOHNSON & NAGLE, PC, Glen Allen, Virginia, for 

Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

2 
3 

PER CURIAM: 

Tammy J. Shaw appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Shaw v. Lynchburg Dep’t of Soc. Servs., No. 

6:08-cv-00022-nkm-mfu (W.D. Va. Jan. 29, 2009). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
#### § 57.22310 Electrical cables (I-C mines).

Electrical cables used to power submersible sump pumps shall be accepted or approved by MSHA as flame resistant, or be installed in continuous metal conduit or metal pipe. The ends of such conduit or pipe shall be sealed to prevent entry of explosive gas or dust.

[57 FR 61223, Dec. 23, 1992]
<PAGE>
                                                                EXHIBIT 10.57A


                    AMENDMENT AND ADDENDUM TO PROMISSORY NOTE

      FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, SAC Holding Corporation, a Nevada
corporation ("Maker"), hereby amends that certain Promissory Note (the "Note")
dated as of March 22, 2001 in the original principal amount of $30,000,000
payable to the order of Nationwide Commercial Co. ("Payee"), as follows.
Capitalized words used herein and not otherwise defined herein have the meaning
ascribed to such words in the Note.

      Section 2(a) of the Note is hereby amended to provide that effective as of
April 1, 2002, Basic Interest (which, for clarity, includes Pay Rate Interest
and Deferred Interest) is payable on a monthly basis, in arrears, on the first
business day of each month throughout the term of the Note.

      In addition, Section 2(e) of the Note is hereby amended to provide that
effective as of April 1, 2002, Cash Flow Contingent Interest is payable on a
monthly basis, in arrears, on the first business day of the month throughout the
term of the Note.

      The Note remains in full force and effect and is not amended in any
respect, except as expressly provided herein.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned executes this Amendment and Addendum
to Promissory Note as of April 16, 2002.

                                               SAC Holding Corporation


                                               By: _____________________________
                                                    Bruce Brockhagen, Secretary


      Payee hereby agrees and consents to the above-described amendment to the
Note this 16th day of April, 2002.


                                               Nationwide Commercial Co.


                                               By: _____________________________
                                                     Gary B. Horton, Secretary
### §3108. Auditability of certain elements of the intelligence community

#### (a) Requirement for annual audits

The head of each covered entity shall ensure that there is a full financial audit of such covered entity each year beginning with fiscal year 2014. Such audits may be conducted by an internal or external independent accounting or auditing organization.

#### (b) Requirement for unqualified opinion

Beginning as early as practicable, but in no event later than the audit required under subsection (a) for fiscal year 2016, the head of each covered entity shall take all reasonable steps necessary to ensure that each audit required under subsection (a) contains an unqualified opinion on the financial statements of such covered entity for the fiscal year covered by such audit.

#### (c) Reports to Congress

The chief financial officer of each covered entity shall provide to the congressional intelligence committees an annual audit report from an accounting or auditing organization on each audit of the covered entity conducted pursuant to subsection (a).

#### (d) Covered entity defined

In this section, the term "covered entity" means the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, the National Reconnaissance Office, and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency.

(July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title V, §509, as added Pub. L. 113–126, title III, §309(a), July 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 1398.)
#### § 57.4203 Extinguisher recharging or replacement.

Fire extinguishers shall be recharged or replaced with a fully charged extinguisher promptly after any discharge.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9701 

To provide for the reallocation of certain grant funds from jurisdictions 

that do not allow for consideration the danger, risk, or threat an individual poses to the community when determining bail or pretrial release 

or that have in effect a policy providing for the sealing of certain 

criminal records. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2024 

Mr. MOLINARO (for himself, Mr. LALOTA, Ms. MALLIOTAKIS, Mr. 

GARBARINO, Mr. LAWLER, Mr. D’ESPOSITO, Mr. LANGWORTHY, Ms. 

TENNEY, and Mr. WILLIAMS of New York) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for the reallocation of certain grant funds from 

jurisdictions that do not allow for consideration the danger, risk, or threat an individual poses to the community 

when determining bail or pretrial release or that have 

in effect a policy providing for the sealing of certain 

criminal records. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keep Our Streets Safe 

5 Act of 2024’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9701 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR STATES RECEIVING BYRNE 

2 GRANT FUNDS. 

3 Section 505 of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 

4 Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10156) is amended by 

5 adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(j) REQUIREMENT FOR DANGEROUSNESS STAND7 ARD FOR PRETRIAL RELEASE.— 

8 ‘‘(1) REQUIREMENT ON STATES.—The Attorney 

9 General shall withhold the amount that would other10 wise be made available to a State under subsection 

11 (b)(1) if the State— 

12 ‘‘(A) does not allow a State court or mag13 istrate to consider the danger, risk, or threat an 

14 individual poses to the community when deter15 mining bail or pretrial release; or 

16 ‘‘(B) has in effect a general policy pro17 viding for the sealing of the criminal records of 

18 felons (other than juveniles). 

19 ‘‘(2) REALLOCATION.—The Attorney General 

20 shall reallocate funds that are withheld from a State 

21 under this subsection to units of local government 

22 within that State, for use in accordance with section 

23 501(a)(1).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 10.18

                                                     November 6, 2002
DIVCO West Group, LLC
San Tomas Properties, LLC
150 Spear Street
San Francisco, CA 94105

    Re:  Office Lease

Dear Sir or Madam:

     Reference  is made to that  certain  Office  Lease by and between San Tomas
Properties,  LLC ("Landlord") and Akamai Technologies,  Inc.  ("Akamai"),  dated
June 30, 2000 (the  "Lease") and ongoing  discussions  of the parties  regarding
restructuring  of the same.  All  capitalized  terms used and not defined herein
shall  have the  meanings  given to them in the Lease.  This is to  confirm  the
agreement of the parties that  effective  upon receipt by Landlord of payment of
Rent for the month of October 2002 in the amount of  $$578,811.39,  such payment
date shall be  retroactive,  and such payment  shall be  considered to have been
made under the Lease without default, nunc pro tunc, as of October 1, 2002. Also
effective upon receipt of such payment by Landlord,  Landlord waives any default
that may have  occurred  relating to delay in payment of Rent for October  2002.
All other  provisions  of the Lease shall  remain in full force and  effect.  By
signing in the space  provided  below,  you represent that you are authorized to
sign this letter agreement on behalf of Landlord, and you agree to the terms set
forth above.

                                           Very truly yours,

                                           Akamai Technologies, Inc.

                                           By: /s/ Akamai Technologies, Inc.
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Name:  Kathryn J. Meyer
                                              Title:  VP, General Counsel
Agreed and Acknowledged:

San Tomas Properties, LLC

/s/ San Tomas Properties LLC
--------------------------------------
Name:  Stuart Shiff
Title: Authorized Signatory
Date:  11-06-02
### Part D—Other Matters
Opinion filed February 16, 2017



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

_____ _ _ _ __ No. 11

- 1 7

- 00 018

- CV

__________ IN THE INTEREST OF A.N.W

. , A CHILD

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Ector County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC2

- 3330

- PC

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant filed a notice of appeal in this cause and states that she “desires to appeal from temporary custody agreement along with child support payments.” In
a letter dated January 24, 2017
, we informed Appellant that it did not appear that she was appealing from a final, appealable order

. See T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN

. § 105.001(e) (West 2014 ) (providing that t emporary orders in suits affecting the parent

- child relationship are not subjec t to interlocutory appeal ). We directe d Appellant to respond on or before February 3, 2017
, and show grounds to continue the appeal . We also informed Appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal

.2

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3. Appell ant has not filed a response

. Consequently, we dismiss the appeal pursuant to Rule 42.3(c).
T h is appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

February 16, 2017 Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson , J., and Bailey , J.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 25, 2013

t0617 

# Order

Clerk June 25, 2013

146934

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

P laintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146934

COA: 307736

Wayne CC: 11

- 007505

- FC

DOUGLAS ALBERT REESE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 21, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
### §561. Scrambling of sexually explicit adult video service programming

#### (a) Requirement

In providing sexually explicit adult programming or other programming that is indecent on any channel of its service primarily dedicated to sexually-oriented programming, a multichannel video programming distributor shall fully scramble or otherwise fully block the video and audio portion of such channel so that one not a subscriber to such channel or programming does not receive it.

#### (b) Implementation

Until a multichannel video programming distributor complies with the requirement set forth in subsection (a), the distributor shall limit the access of children to the programming referred to in that subsection by not providing such programming during the hours of the day (as determined by the Commission) when a significant number of children are likely to view it.

#### (c) "Scramble" defined

As used in this section, the term "scramble" means to rearrange the content of the signal of the programming so that the programming cannot be viewed or heard in an understandable manner.

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title VI, §641, as added Pub. L. 104–104, title V, §505(a), Feb. 8, 1996, 110 Stat. 136.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Constitutionality

For information regarding the constitutionality of this section, see the Table of Laws Held Unconstitutional in Whole or in Part by the Supreme Court on the Constitution Annotated website, constitution.congress.gov.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 104–104, title V, §505(b), Feb. 8, 1996, 110 Stat. 136, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [enacting this section] shall take effect 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Feb. 8, 1996]."
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Dixie Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary A. Harmon, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/GARY A. HARMON

Gary A. Harmon, Chief Financial Officer
Date:    July 13, 2007



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Dixie Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Dixie Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 240 (Monday, December 14, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 80785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27371]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK


Intent to Conduct a Detailed Economic Impact Analysis

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Charter of the Export-Import Bank of the 
United States, this notice is to inform the public that the Export-
Import Bank of the United States has received an application for $8.56 
million in medium-term loan insurance to support the export of 
approximately $7.4 million worth of engineering services, grinding 
technology, steam heating and other mechanical equipment. The U.S. 
exports will enable the Brazilian company to double production at an 
existing facility, allowing it to produce up to 3 million liters a day 
of ethanol, 574 thousand metric tons a year of Distillers Dried Grains 
with Solubles (DDGS) and 36,500 liters a year of Corn Oil. Production 
of ethanol and corn oil will be sold primarily in Brazil. New 
production of DDGS will be sold primarily in Brazil, with smaller 
amounts to Europe and Asia

DATES: Comments are due 14 days from publication in the Federal 
Register.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties may submit comments on this transaction 
electronically on www.regulations.gov, or by email to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3154525e5f5e5c58521f585c41505245715449585c1f565e47"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d6b3b5b9b8b9bbbfb5f8bfbba6b7b5a296b3aebfbbf8b1b9a0">[email protected]</span></a>.

Scott Condren,
Policy Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2020-27371 Filed 12-11-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>