81450 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 242 / Wednesday, December 16, 2020 / Notices 

Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 

83 FR 37784 (August 2, 2018) (Shrimp from India 

Preliminary Results), unchanged in Certain Frozen 

Warmwater Shrimp from India: Notice of Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review, 83 FR 49909 (October 3, 

2018) (Shrimp from India Final Results). 

6See, e.g., Shrimp from India Preliminary Results, 

83 FR at 37784, unchanged in Shrimp from India 

Final Results, 83 FR at 49909. 

7See Shrimp from India Preliminary Results, 83 

FR at 37784, unchanged in Shrimp from India Final 

Results, 83 FR at 49910; see also Notice of Final 

Results of Changed Circumstances Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review: Polychloroprene 

Rubber from Japan, 67 FR 58, 59 (January 2, 2002); 

Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from France: Final 

Results of Changed-Circumstances Review, 75 FR 

34688, 34689 (June 18, 2010); Circular Welded NonAlloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea; 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review, 63 FR 14679 (March 26, 

1998), unchanged in Circular Welded Non-Alloy 

Steel Pipe from Korea; Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 

63 FR 20572 (April 27, 1998), in which Commerce 

found that a company which only changed its name 

and did not change its operations is a successor in 

interest to the company before it changed its name. 

8See LNSK Greenhouse Agro CCR Request; and 

SQR. 

9See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Frozen Warmwater 

Shrimp from India: Preliminary Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review,’’ dated concurrently with 

this notice. 

10See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2). 

11See 19 CFR 351.303(b). 

12See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD 

Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension 

of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 

1See Large Residential Washers from Mexico: 

Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2018–2019, 85 FR 11338 

(February 27, 2020) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

(PDM). 

2See Electrolux’s Case Brief, ‘‘Sixth 

Administrative Review of Large Residential 

Washers from Mexico: Case Brief of Electrolux,’’ 

dated April 6, 2020; see also GE’s Case Brief, 

‘‘Administrative Review of Large Residential 

Washers from Mexico Antidumping Order: Case 

Brief,’’ dated April 6, 2020. 

3See Electrolux’s Rebuttal Brief, ‘‘Sixth 

Administrative Review of Large Residential 

Washers from Mexico: Rebuttal Brief of Electrolux,’’ 

dated April 13, 2020; Whirlpool’s Rebuttal Brief, 

‘‘Large Residential Washers from Mexico: Rebuttal 

Brief of Whirlpool Corporation,’’ dated April 13, 

2020; and GE’s Rebuttal Brief, ‘‘Administrative 

Review of Large Residential Washers from Mexico 

Antidumping Order: GEA Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated 

April 13, 2020. 

4For a full description of the scope of the order, 

see Preliminary Results PDM. 

factor or combination of factors will 

necessarily provide a dispositive 

indication of a successor-in-interest 

relationship, generally, Commerce will 

consider the new company to be the 

successor to the previous company if 

the new company’s resulting operation 

is not materially dissimilar to that of its 

predecessor.6 Thus, if the record 

evidence demonstrates that, with 

respect to the production and sale of the 

subject merchandise, the new company 

operates as the same business entity as 

the predecessor company, Commerce 

may assign the new company the cash 

deposit rate of its predecessor.7

In accordance with 19 CFR 351.216, 

we preliminarily determine that LNSK 

Greenhouse Agro is the successor in 

interest to Greenhouse Agro. Record 

evidence, as submitted by LNSK 

Greenhouse Agro, indicates that LNSK 

Greenhouse Agro operates as essentially 

the same business entity as Greenhouse 

Agro with respect to the subject 

merchandise.8 For the complete 

successor-in-interest analysis, including 

discussion of business proprietary 

information, refer to the accompanying 

successor-in-interest memorandum.9

Commerce will issue its final results of 

the review in accordance with the time 

limits set forth in 19 CFR 351.216(e). 

Public Comment 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), any 

interested party may request a hearing 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice. In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(1)(ii), interested parties may 

submit case briefs not later than 30 days 

after the date of publication of this 

notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues 

raised in the case briefs, may be filed no 

later than seven days after the case 

briefs, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.309(d). Parties who submit case or 

rebuttal briefs are encouraged to submit 

with each argument: (1) A statement of 

the issue; (2) a brief summary of the 

argument; and (3) a table of 

authorities.10 All comments are to be 

filed electronically using Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS) 

available to registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. An electronically filed 

document must be received successfully 

in its entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. 

Eastern Time on the day it is due.11

Note that Commerce has temporarily 

modified certain of its requirements for 

serving documents containing business 

proprietary information, until further 

notice.12

Consistent with 19 CFR 351.216(e), 

we will issue the final results of this 

changed circumstances review no later 

than 270 days after the date on which 

this review was initiated. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 

777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(4) and (c)(3). 

Dated: December 10, 2020. 

Jeffrey I. Kessler, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2020–27686 Filed 12–15–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–201–842] 

Large Residential Washers From 

Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2018– 

2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) finds that sales of large 

residential washers (LRW) from Mexico 

were made at less than normal value 

(NV) during the period of review, 

February 1, 2018 through January 31, 

2019. 

DATES: Applicable December 16, 2020. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

William Miller, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3906. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

This review covers one producer/ 

exporter of the subject merchandise, 

Electrolux Home Products Corp. N.V. 

and Electrolux Home Products de 

Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (collectively, 

Electrolux). On February 27, 2020, 

Commerce published the Preliminary 

Results.1 On April 6, 2020, we received 

case briefs on behalf of Electrolux and 

Haier U.S. Appliance Solutions dba GE 

Appliances (GE).2 On April 13, 2020, we 

received rebuttal briefs on behalf of 

Electrolux, Whirlpool Corporation 

(Whirlpool), and GE.3

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the order are 

all large residential washers and certain 

subassemblies thereof from Mexico. The 

products are currently classifiable under 

subheadings 8450.20.0040 and 

8450.20.0080 of the Harmonized Tariff 

System of the United States (HTSUS). 

Products subject to this order may also 

enter under HTSUS subheadings 

8450.11.0040, 8450.11.0080, 

8450.90.2000, and 8450.90.6000. 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

merchandise subject to this scope is 

dispositive.4


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 242 / Wednesday, December 16, 2020 / Notices 81451 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2018– 

2019 Administrative Review of the Antidumping 

Duty Order on Large Residential Washers from 

Mexico,’’ (IDM), dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice. 

6See Large Residential Washers from Mexico and 

the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders, 

78 FR 11148 (February 15, 2013). 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs are listed in the 

Appendix to this notice and addressed 

in the IDM.5 Interested parties can find 

a complete discussion of these issues 

and the corresponding 

recommendations in this public 

memorandum, which is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the IDM can be 

accessed directly at https://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 

The signed IDM and the electronic 

version of the IDM are identical in 

content. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties regarding our Preliminary 

Results, we made no changes to the 

preliminary weighted-average margin 

for Electrolux. 

Final Results of the Review 

As a result of this review, Commerce 

determines that a weighted-average 

dumping margin of 3.53 percent exists 

for Electrolux for the period February 1, 

2018 through January 31, 2019. 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce has determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Electrolux reported the entered value of 

its U.S. sales such that we calculated 

importer-specific ad valorem duty 

assessment rates based on the ratio of 

the total amount of dumping calculated 

for the examined sales to the total 

entered value of the sales for which 

entered value was reported. Where the 

respondent’s weighted-average dumping 

margin is zero or de minimis within the 

meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an 

importer-specific assessment rate is zero 

or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

We intend to issue liquidation 

instructions to CBP 41 days after 

publication of the final results of this 

review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for Electrolux will 

be equal to the weighted-average 

dumping margin that is established in 

the final results of this review, except if 

the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, 

therefore, de minimis within the 

meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in 

which case the cash deposit rate will be 

zero; (2) for previously investigated 

companies not participating in this 

review, the cash deposit will continue 

to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding in 

which the company participated; (3) if 

the exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the original 

less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 

investigation, but the manufacturer is, 

the cash deposit rate will be the cash 

deposit rate established for the most 

recently completed segment for the 

producer of the subject merchandise; 

and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers or exporters will continue to 

be 36.52 percent, the all-others rate 

established in the LTFV investigation.6

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Secretary’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: December 10, 2020. 

Jeffrey I. Kessler, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the IDM 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Margin Calculations 

IV. Discussion of Issues 

Comment 1: Differential Pricing—the Ratio 

Test 

Comment 2: Differential Pricing— 

Calculating the Denominator of the 

Cohen’s d Test 

Comment 3: CEP Offset for Electrolux’s 

Canadian Sales 

Comment 4: Capping Freight Revenue in 

the Comparison Market 

V. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2020–27638 Filed 12–15–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

North American Free Trade Agreement 

(NAFTA), Article 1904; Binational Panel 

Review: Notice of NAFTA Panel 

Decision 

AGENCY: United States Section, NAFTA 

Secretariat, International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of NAFTA Panel 

Decision in the matter of Ammonium 

Sulphate from the United States of 

America. (Secretariat File Number: 

MEX–USA–2015–1904–01.) 

SUMMARY: On December 7, 2020, a 

NAFTA Binational Panel issued its 

Final Decision in the matter of 

Ammonium Sulphate from the United 

States of America (Determination on 

Remand). The Binational Panel 

remanded the Secretaria de Economia’s 

(Economia) Determination on Remand 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES