alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsMechanical Model Development for Composite Structural SupercapacitorsNovel composite structural supercapacitor concepts have recently been developed as a means both to store electrical charge and to provide modest mechanical load carrying capability. Double-layer composite supercapacitors are often fabricated by impregnating a woven carbon fiber fabric, which serves as the electrodes, with a structural polymer electrolyte. Polypropylene or a glass fabric is often used as the separator material. Recent research has been primarily limited to evaluating these composites experimentally. In this study, mechanical models based on the Multiscale Generalized Method of Cells (MSGMC) were developed and used to calculate the shear and tensile properties and response of two composite structural supercapacitors from the literature. The modeling approach was first validated against traditional composite laminate data. MSGMC models for composite supercapacitors were developed, and accurate elastic shear/tensile properties were obtained. It is envisioned that further development of the models presented in this work will facilitate the design of composite components for aerospace and automotive applications and can be used to screen candidate constituent materials for inclusion in future composite structural supercapacitor concepts.Document ID20160013861Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsRicks, Trenton M.*(Mississippi State Univ. Mississippi State, MS, United States)*Lacy, Thomas E., Jr.*(Mississippi State Univ. Mississippi State, MS, United States)*Santiago, Diana*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Bednarcyk, Brett A.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredNovember 30, 2016Publication DateNovember 1, 2016Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberE-19296GRC-E-DAA-TN35065NASA/TM-2016-219391Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NNC16QA09DWBS: WBS 533127.02.16.03.03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.KeywordsMicromechanicsSupercapacitorsComposite MaterialsAvailable DownloadsNameType20160013861.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 56.4400 Use restrictions. ( a ) Flammable liquids shall not be used for cleaning.
( b ) Solvents shall not be used near an open flame or other ignition source, near any source of heat, or in an atmosphere that can elevate the temperature of the solvent above the flash point.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1846
NATHANIEL H. CARTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus OFFICER BIRCHFIELD; MARK R. HENRY, Officer, Defendants - Appellees, and MARYLAND TRANSPORTATION POLICE AUTHORITY; J. WATSON, Officer; OFFICER HOWELL; R. ANDERSON, Cadet, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-96- 1701-AMD) Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 11, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Nathaniel H. Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Karen June Kruger, GiseleMarie Mathews, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals from the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Carter v. Officer Birchfield , No. CA-96-1701-AMD (D. Md. Apr. 28, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

69–011 2017

115th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 115–26 

CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY 

WITH RESPECT TO SIGNIFICANT MALICIOUS 

CYBER-ENABLED ACTIVITIES 

MESSAGE 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

NOTIFICATION THAT THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT 

TO SIGNIFICANT MALICIOUS CYBER-ENABLED ACTIVITIES, 

ORIGINALLY DECLARED IN EXECUTIVE ORDER 13694 OF APRIL 

1, 2015, IS TO CONTINUE IN EFFECT BEYOND APRIL 1, 2017, 

PURSUANT TO 50 U.S.C. 1622(d); PUBLIC LAW 94–412, SEC. 202(d); 

(90 STAT. 1257) 

MARCH 30, 2017.—Message and accompanying papers referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs and ordered to be printed 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with REPORTSE:\Seals\Congress.#13

lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
(1) 

To the Congress of the United States: 

Section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 

1622(d)) provides for the automatic termination of a national emergency unless, within 90 days prior to the anniversary date of its 

declaration, the President publishes in the Federal Register and 

transmits to the Congress a notice stating that the emergency is 

to continue in effect beyond the anniversary date. In accordance 

with this provision, I have sent to the Federal Register for publication the enclosed notice stating that the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13694 of April 1, 2015, is to continue in 

effect beyond April 1, 2017. 

Significant malicious cyber-enabled activities originating from, or 

directed by persons located, in whole or in substantial part, outside 

the United States, continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary 

threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the 

United States. Therefore, I have determined that it is necessary to 

continue the national emergency declared in Executive Order 

13694 with respect to significant malicious cyber-enabled activities. 

DONALD J. TRUMP. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, March 29, 2017. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
#### § 56.10009 Riding loaded buckets.

Persons shall not ride loaded buckets.
#### § 57.12004 Electrical conductors.

Electrical conductors shall be of a sufficient size and current-carrying capacity to ensure that a rise in temperature resulting from normal operations will not damage the insulating materials. Electrical conductors exposed to mechanical damage shall be protected.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of RADA Electronic Industries Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Elan Sigal, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Elan Sigal*
---------------
Elan Sigal
Chief Financial Officer
April 15, 2004



* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
AUTHORIZATION

        Know all by these presents, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and
appoints each of Bonnie J. Paskvan and Alfred J. Walker, signing singly, the
undersigned's true and lawful attorney-in-fact to:

(1) execute for and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned's capacity
as an affiliate of General Communication, Inc. (the "Company"), Form 4, in
accordance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
rules thereunder;

(2) do and perform any and all acts for and on behalf of the undersigned which
may be necessary or desirable to complete and execute any such Form 4, complete
and execute any amendment or amendments thereto, and timely file such form with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any stock exchange or
similar authority; and

(3) take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the
foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit to,
in the best interest of, or legally required by, the undersigned, it being
understood that the documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on behalf of the
undersigned pursuant to this Power of Attorney shall be in such form and shall
contain such terms and conditions as such attorney-in-fact may approve in such
attorney-in-fact's discretion.

        The undersigned hereby grants to each such attorney-in-fact full power
and authority to do and perform any and every act and thing whatsoever
requisite, necessary, or proper to be done in the exercise of any of the rights
and powers herein granted, as fully to all intents and purposes as the
undersigned might or could do if personally present, with full power of
substitution or revocation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such
attorney-in-fact, or such attorney-in-fact's substitute or substitutes, shall
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this power of attorney and the
rights and powers herein granted. The undersigned acknowledges that the
foregoing attorneys-in-fact, in serving in such capacity at the request of the
undersigned, are not assuming, nor is the Company assuming, any of the
undersigned's responsibilities to comply with Section 16 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.

        This Power of Attorney shall remain in full force and effect until the
undersigned is no longer required to file Form 4, with respect to the
undersigned's holdings of and transactions in securities issued by the Company,
unless earlier revoked by the undersigned in a signed writing delivered to the
foregoing attorneys-in-fact.


                                   1
<PAGE>
        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Power of Attorney to
be executed as of this 14th day of January 2003.


                                 /s/
                                 ------------------------
                                 Signature


                                 John M. Lowber
                                 ------------------------
                                 Print Name
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT HEATH WHITEAKER, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-896 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ ) Opinion filed June 5, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Keith Spoto, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Donna S. Koch, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9487 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9487

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            December 17 (legislative day, December 16), 2024

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1970 to authorize the 
 Legislative Counsel of the House of Representatives to designate more 
than one of the attorneys of the Office of the Legislative Counsel as a 
          Deputy Legislative Counsel, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``House Office of Legislative Counsel 
Modernization Act''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF MULTIPLE DEPUTY LEGISLATIVE COUNSELS.

    (a) Designation.--Section 522(b)(1) of the Legislative 
Reorganization Act of 1970 (2 U.S.C. 282a(b)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by amending the first sentence to read as follows: 
        ``The Legislative Counsel shall designate one or more of the 
        attorneys appointed under subsection (a) as a Deputy 
        Legislative Counsel.''; and
            (2) in the second sentence, by striking ``the Deputy 
        Legislative Counsel shall perform the functions of the 
        Legislative Counsel.'' and inserting ``the functions of the 
        Legislative Counsel shall be performed by a Deputy Legislative 
        Counsel. If there is more than one Deputy Legislative Counsel, 
        the Deputy Legislative Counsel who shall perform such functions 
        shall be determined in accordance with the order specified in a 
        notice filed with the Speaker and the Minority Leader of the 
        House by the Legislative Counsel.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 522(b)(2) of such Act (2 U.S.C. 
282a(b)(2)) is amended by striking ``Deputy Legislative Counsel'' and 
inserting ``Deputy Legislative Counsels''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 16, 2024.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### § 57.14102 Brakes for rail equipment.

Braking systems on railroad cars and locomotives shall be maintained in functional condition.
Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements:





(a)
            the
      Registration Statement (Form S-3/A Amendment No. 3 No. 333-141098) and
      related prospectus of OccuLogix, Inc. for the registration of 9,441,749
      shares of common stock; and





(b)
            the
      Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-124505) pertaining to the
      Employees’ Stock Option Plan of OccuLogix,
  Inc.;






of our
reports dated March 14, 2008, (except for note 2(a) as to which the date is July
18, 2008) with respect to the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule of OccuLogix, Inc., and March 14, 2008 (except for internal
control over financial reporting related to the material weakness described in
the sixth paragraph of that report, as to which the date is July 18, 2008) on
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of OccuLogix,
Inc., included in this restated Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended
December 31, 2007.








August
      26, 2008
            /s/
      Ernst & Young LLPToronto,
      Canada
            Chartered
      AccountantsLicensed
      Public Accountants
### §167k. Violations; penalties

Whoever willfully violates, attempts to violate, or conspires to violate, any provision of this chapter or any regulation or order issued or any terms of a license granted thereunder shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by a fine of not more than $5,000 or by imprisonment for not more than two years, or both, except that whoever commits such an offense with intent to injure the United States or with intent to secure an advantage to any foreign nation, shall upon conviction thereof, be punished by a fine of not more than $20,000 or by imprisonment for not more than twenty years, or both.

(Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 426, §13, as added Pub. L. 86–777, §2, Sept. 13, 1960, 74 Stat. 923.)
**EXHIBIT 32**

**STATEMENTPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS REQUIRED BYSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of John Deere Capital Corporation (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned herebycertify that to the best of our knowledge:

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| June 1, 2007 | * * | */s/ R.  W. Lane*      |   | Chairman and Principal Executive Officer               |
|--------------|----------|------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|         |     | R. W. Lane             |   |                                                   |
|         |     |                   |   |                                                   |
| June 1, 2007 | * * | */s/ M.  J. Mack, Jr.* |   | Senior Vice President and Principal Financial  Officer |
|         |     | M. J. Mack, Jr.        |   |                                                   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to John DeereCapital Corporation and will be retained by John Deere Capital Corporation andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

25

----
#### § 285.104 [Reserved]
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 17

- 00229

- CV
Adams Garden Irrigation District # 19, Bayview Irrigation District # 11, Brownsville Irrigation District, Cameron County Irrigation District #2, Cameron County Irrigation District #6, Cameron County Irrig at ion District # 16, et al. v. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
On Appeal from the 201st District Court of Travis County , Texas

Trial Court Cause No. D

- 1

- GN

- 16

- 002954

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on
ap pea l, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant s

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. October 2 1, 2021
### §1326. Authority of the Inspector General

(a) In General.—The Inspector General of the Department of Transportation, in accordance with the mission of the Inspector General to prevent and detect fraud and abuse, shall have authority to review only the financial management, property management, and business operations of the Surface Transportation Board, including internal accounting and administrative control systems, to determine the Board's compliance with applicable Federal laws, rules, and regulations.

(b) Duties.—In carrying out this section, the Inspector General shall—

(1) keep the Chairman of the Board, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives fully and currently informed about problems relating to administration of the internal accounting and administrative control systems of the Board;

(2) issue findings and recommendations for actions to address the problems referred to in paragraph (1); and

(3) submit periodic reports to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives that describe any progress made in implementing actions to address the problems referred to in paragraph (1).

(c) Access to Information.—In carrying out this section, the Inspector General may exercise authorities granted to the Inspector General under subsections (a) and (c) of section 406 of title 5.

(d) Authorization of Appropriations.—

(1) Funding.—There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Transportation for use by the Inspector General of the Department of Transportation such sums as may be necessary to cover expenses associated with activities pursuant to the authority exercised under this section.

(2) Reimbursable agreement.—In the absence of an appropriation under this subsection for an expense referred to in paragraph (1), the Inspector General and the Board shall have a reimbursement agreement to cover such expense.

(Added Pub. L. 114–110, §9, Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 2232; amended Pub. L. 117–286, §4(b)(97), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4353.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 117–286 substituted "subsections (a) and (c) of section 406 of title 5." for "subsections (a) and (b) of section 6 of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.)."
### §1872. Declassification of significant decisions, orders, and opinions

#### (a) Declassification required

Subject to subsection (b), the Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the Attorney General, shall conduct a declassification review, to be concluded as soon as practicable, but not later than 180 days after the commencement of such review, of each decision, order, or opinion issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court or the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review (as defined in section 1871(e) of this title) that includes a significant construction or interpretation of any provision of law, including any novel or significant construction or interpretation of the term "specific selection term", and, consistent with that review, make publicly available to the greatest extent practicable each such decision, order, or opinion.

#### (b) Redacted form

The Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the Attorney General, may satisfy the requirement under subsection (a) to make a decision, order, or opinion described in such subsection publicly available to the greatest extent practicable by making such decision, order, or opinion publicly available in redacted form.

#### (c) National security waiver

The Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the Attorney General, may waive the requirement to declassify and make publicly available a particular decision, order, or opinion under subsection (a), if—

(1) the Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the Attorney General, determines that a waiver of such requirement is necessary to protect the national security of the United States or properly classified intelligence sources or methods; and

(2) the Director of National Intelligence makes publicly available an unclassified statement prepared by the Attorney General, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence—

(A) summarizing the significant construction or interpretation of any provision of law, which shall include, to the extent consistent with national security, a description of the context in which the matter arises and any significant construction or interpretation of any statute, constitutional provision, or other legal authority relied on by the decision; and

(B) that specifies that the statement has been prepared by the Attorney General and constitutes no part of the opinion of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court or the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review.

(Pub. L. 95–511, title VI, §602, as added Pub. L. 114–23, title IV, §402(a)(2), June 2, 2015, 129 Stat. 281; amended Pub. L. 118–49, §7, Apr. 20, 2024, 138 Stat. 873.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2024—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 118–49 inserted ", to be concluded as soon as practicable, but not later than 180 days after the commencement of such review," after "shall conduct a declassification review".