alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9418 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9418

To permit a single application to be submitted to the COPS Director or 
    BJA Director for the matching grant program for school security.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 27, 2024

  Mr. Nickel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To permit a single application to be submitted to the COPS Director or 
    BJA Director for the matching grant program for school security.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Single Application for School Safety 
Act'' or the ``SASS Act''.

SEC. 2. MATCHING GRANT PROGRAM FOR SCHOOL SECURITY APPLICATION 
              REQUIREMENT.

    Section 2702 of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 
1968 (34 U.S.C. 10552) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Multipurpose Applications.--The Attorney General shall 
establish a process under which a single grant application may be 
submitted for a grant that is authorized to be made by the COPS 
Director under paragraph (1) of section 2701(a) and the BJA Director 
under paragraph (2) of such section.
    ``(d) Technical Assistance.--The COPS Director or the BJA Director, 
as the case may be, shall provide technical assistance to applicants to 
complete an application for a grant under this part.''.
                                 <all>
```
### FOR PUBLICATION


### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 05-10243

v. D.C. No.

CR-03-01294-ROS J EREMY E UGENE S TAFFELDT ; 

#  District of Arizona, O RLANDO L EON P ASTRANO ; L INCOLN Phoenix C LARENCE M ETZGAR ; J OHN A NTHONY G ONZALES , ORDER

Defendants-Appellees. 

# 

Filed April 22, 2008

Before: Stephen Reinhardt, John T. Noonan, and Michael Daly Hawkins, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The Government’s unopposed motion to amend the opinion is GRANTED. The opinion published at 451 F.3d 578 (9th Cir. 2006) is amended to delete all mentions of the name “Keith Vercauteren. ” Accordingly, the phrase “In September 2003, Assistant United States Attorney Keith Vercauteren (“AUSA Vercauteren ”) . . . ” shall be amended to read, “In September 2003, an Assistant United States Attorney ( “the AUSA”) . . . ” All subsequent references to “AUSA Vercauteren” shall be amended to read, “the AUSA. ”

4215PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson/West.
#### § 56.7803 Lighting the burner.

A suitable means of protection shall be provided for the employee when lighting the burner.
#### § 585.647 How will my GAP be processed for Federal consistency under the Coastal Zone Management Act?

Your GAP will be processed based on whether it is submitted before or after your lease or grant is issued:

| If your GAP is
submitted: | Consistency review of your GAP will be handled as follows: |
| --- | --- |
| (a) Before lease or grant issuance | You will furnish a copy of your GAP, consistency certification, and necessary data and information to conduct an adequate consistency review to the applicable State CZMA agencies if required by 15 CFR part 930, subpart D. Submit a copy to BOEM pursuant to § 585.111. |
| (b) After lease or grant issuance | You will submit a copy of your GAP, consistency certification, and necessary data and information to BOEM if required by 15 CFR part 930, subpart E. BOEM will forward to the applicable State CZMA agency or agencies one copy of your GAP, consistency certification, and necessary data and information to conduct an adequate consistency review required under 15 CFR part 930, subpart E, after BOEM has determined that all information requirements for the GAP are met. |
 Avoid quick or sharp turns

 Drive slower near ditches, slopes, 

waterways and manure pits

 Turn downhill when turning is 

necessary

SAFE TRACTORS Save Lives

OSHA is here to help. www.osha.gov/farmsafety OSHA 3867 06-2016
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Joseph Michael William Brady, Relator, v. Edward M. Fay, as Warden of Green Haven Prison, Respondent.

Motion by relator to dispense with printing, for assignment of counsel, and for other relief. Motion denied, with leave to relator to renew the motion, if so advised, after the making and entry of an order dismissing the relator’s writ of habeas corpus, and the taking of an appeal therefrom. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
### SUBCHAPTER II—PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITIES
EXHIBIT 32.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
               TO RULE 13a-14(b)
______________________________________________________________________________


In connection with the Annual Report of Gallery of History, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Rod Lynam, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Rod Lynam
________________
Rod Lynam
Chief Financial Officer

December 26, 2008
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.866 Personnel safety equipment.

You must maintain all personnel safety equipment located on a facility, whether required or not, in good working condition.
#### Carl H. Elshoff, appellee, v. Thomas F. Murray, appellant.

Preliminary order of injunction granted. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Sangamon county; the Hon. E. S. Smith, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1923.

Appeal dismissed.

Opinion filed April 23, 1923.

Soelke & Johnson and George W. Kenney, for appellant. John G. Friedmeyer and Winston, Strawn & Shaw, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Shurtleff

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §3039. Assistance to United States law enforcement agencies

#### (a) Authority to provide assistance

Subject to subsection (b), elements of the intelligence community may, upon the request of a United States law enforcement agency, collect information outside the United States about individuals who are not United States persons. Such elements may collect such information notwithstanding that the law enforcement agency intends to use the information collected for purposes of a law enforcement investigation or counterintelligence investigation.

#### (b) Limitation on assistance by elements of Department of Defense

(1) With respect to elements within the Department of Defense, the authority in subsection (a) applies only to the following:

(A) The National Security Agency.

(B) The National Reconnaissance Office.

(C) The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency.

(D) The Defense Intelligence Agency.

(2) Assistance provided under this section by elements of the Department of Defense may not include the direct participation of a member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps in an arrest or similar activity.

(3) Assistance may not be provided under this section by an element of the Department of Defense if the provision of such assistance will adversely affect the military preparedness of the United States.

(4) The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations governing the exercise of authority under this section by elements of the Department of Defense, including regulations relating to the protection of sources and methods in the exercise of such authority.

#### (c) Definitions

For purposes of subsection (a):

(1) The term "United States law enforcement agency" means any department or agency of the Federal Government that the Attorney General designates as law enforcement agency for purposes of this section.

(2) The term "United States person" means the following:

(A) A United States citizen.

(B) An alien known by the intelligence agency concerned to be a permanent resident alien.

(C) An unincorporated association substantially composed of United States citizens or permanent resident aliens.

(D) A corporation incorporated in the United States, except for a corporation directed and controlled by a foreign government or governments.

(July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title I, §105A, as added Pub. L. 104–293, title VIII, §814(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3483; amended Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title IX, §921(e)(3), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1569.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 403–5a of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

2003—Subsec. (b)(1)(C). Pub. L. 108–136 substituted "National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency" for "National Imagery and Mapping Agency".
#### Pedro A. Rosa, Respondent, v. Doris Meltzer et al., Appellants.

Order, entered on August 18, 1960, denying defendants-appellants’ motion, pursuant to rule 90 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to compel plaintiff-respondent to serve an amended complaint separately stating and numbering different causes of action, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
### §22701. Definitions

In this subchapter: 1

(1) Private benefit.—

(A) In general.—The term "private benefit"—

(i) means a benefit accrued to a person or private entity, other than Amtrak, that directly improves the economic and competitive condition of that person or entity through improved assets, cost reductions, service improvements, or any other means as defined by the Secretary; and

(ii) shall be determined on a project-by-project basis, based upon an agreement between the parties.

(B) Consultation.—The Secretary may seek the advice of the States and rail carriers in further defining this term.

(2) Public benefit.—

(A) In general.—The term "public benefit"—

(i) means a benefit accrued to the public, including Amtrak, in the form of enhanced mobility of people or goods, environmental protection or enhancement, congestion mitigation, enhanced trade and economic development, improved air quality or land use, more efficient energy use, enhanced public safety or security, reduction of public expenditures due to improved transportation efficiency or infrastructure preservation, and any other positive community effects as defined by the Secretary; and

(ii) shall be determined on a project-by-project basis, based upon an agreement between the parties.

(B) Consultation.—The Secretary may seek the advice of the States and rail carriers in further defining this term.

(3) State.—The term "State" means any of the 50 States and the District of Columbia.

(4) State rail transportation authority.—The term "State rail transportation authority" means the State agency or official responsible under the direction of the Governor of the State or a State law for preparation, maintenance, coordination, and administration of the State rail plan.

(Added Pub. L. 110–432, div. B, title III, §303(a), Oct. 16, 2008, 122 Stat. 4947.)

1 So in original. Probably should be "chapter:".
Table
      of Contents


**EXHIBIT
      32.1**







The
      following certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238.
      These certifications shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be incorporated
      by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933,
      as
      amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
      incorporation language in such filing.








**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      the undersigned officer of Schiff Nutrition International, Inc., a Delaware
      corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:




(i)  the
      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
      August 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as amended; and




(ii)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
                October 16, 2006
            By:
            */s/
                Bruce J. Wood*Bruce
                J. WoodChief
                Executive Officer





A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to Schiff Nutrition International, Inc. and will be retained by Schiff
      Nutrition International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.








**Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      the undersigned officer of Schiff Nutrition International, Inc. a Delaware,
      corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:





(iii)  the
      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
      August 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as amended; and





(iv)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
                October 16, 2006
            By:
            ***/s/
                Joseph W. Baty*Joseph
                W. BatyChief
                Financial Officer





A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to Schiff Nutrition International, Inc. and will be retained by Schiff
      Nutrition International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 586.210 How long may I conduct activities under an Alternate Use RUE? ( a ) We will establish on a case-by-case basis, and set forth in the Alternate Use RUE, the length of time for which you are authorized to conduct activities approved in your Alternate Use RUE instrument.
( b ) In establishing this term, BOEM will consider the size and scale of the proposed alternate use activities, the type of alternate use activities, and any other relevant considerations.
( c ) BOEM may authorize renewal of Alternate Use RUEs at its discretion.
### SUBCHAPTER XI—MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
No. 45,384

#### Jack L. Rosson, *Appellant,*v. Allied Mutual Insurance Company, a Corporation, *Appellee.*

(457 P. 2d 42)

Opinion filed July 17, 1969.

*Gerald L. Michaud,*of Wichita, argued the cause, and *Russell Cranmer, M. William Syrios, Kenneth L. Ingham, Bradley Post,*and *Jim Lawing,*of Wichita, were with him on the brief for appellant.

*H. E. Jones,*of Wichita, argued the cause, and A. *W. Hershberger, Richard Jones, Jerome E. Jones, Robert J. Roth, William R. Smith, Robert J. O’Connor, Greer Gsell, Michael L. Jones,*and *Stephen J. Jones,*of Wichita, were with him on the brief for appellee.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, J.:

This appeal involves the interpretation of an "uninsured motorists” provision of a liability insurance policy issued by Allied Mutual Insurance Company, a corporation, covering the plaintiff’s two automobiles for which he paid a premium of equal amount on each described vehicle.

Except for the date of the plaintiff’s injury, which occurred on October 1, 1966, and the amount of damages awarded the plaintiff by the arbitrator, this case is identical in factual situations and legal issues as those presented in *Sturdy v. Allied Mutual Ins. Co.,*203 Kan. 783, 457 P. 2d 34.

The arbitrator made an award in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant in the sum of $14,053.15. The defendant paid the plaintiff the sum of $10,000 on one described automobile pursuant to the uninsured motorists provision of its policy, and plaintiff has *796sued to recover an additional $10,000 on the other described automobile. The district court denied recovery, and the plaintiff has appealed.

We hold the plaintiff is entitled to recover the damages awarded by the arbitrator in the total sum of $14,053.15.

The insurance policy involved in this lawsuit is identical to the policy in *Sturdy,*supra, except for the amount of the premiums, and its provisions expressly provide the amount the plaintiff may recover as damages.

Part IV of the policy contains “protection against uninsured motorists,” and the word “insured” as used therein means “the named insured” as contained in the declarations of the policy, or, in this case, the plaintiff. Coverage J contains the provision for damages for bodily injury caused by an uninsured motorist, and obligates the defendant:

> “To pay all sums which the insured or his legal representative shall be legally entitled to recover as damages from the owner or operator of an uninsured automobile because of bodily injury . . .”

The damages awarded to the plaintiff have heretofore been determined by the arbitration proceeding to be $14,053.15, of which $10,000 has been paid. Hence, under the general provisions of the policy the plaintiff is entitled to recover from the defendant the additional sum of $4,053.15.

As indicated in *Sturdy,*supra, the plaintiff is not entitled to recover attorneys’ fees in this action and they are denied. The judgment of the district court is reversed with directions to enter judgment in the amount of $4,053.15, together with interest at 6 percent per annum from July 31, 1967.

It is so ordered.

Price, C. J., and Fromme, J., dissent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited financial statements contained in the company's Form 10-QSB and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                        2280042
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 81467
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              2361509
<PP&E>                                        217073
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                2578582
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         74043
<BONDS>                                       0
<COMMON>                                      537500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                    1967039
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  2578582
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              154415
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 57068
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               97347
<INCOME-TAX>                                  39700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           57647
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                  57647
<EPS-BASIC>                                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0


</TABLE>
§ 57.22234 Actions at 1.0 percent methane (I-A, I-B, III, V-A, and V-B mines). ( a ) If methane reaches 1.0 percent in the mine atmosphere, ventilation changes shall be made to reduce the methane. Until such changes are achieved— ( 1 ) All persons other than competent persons necessary to make the ventilation changes shall be withdrawn from affected areas;
( 2 ) Electrical power shall be deenergized in affected areas, except power to monitoring equipment determined by MSHA to be intrinsically safe under 30 CFR part 18; and
( 3 ) Diesel equipment shall be shut off or immediately removed from the area.
( b ) If methane reaches 1.0 percent at a main exhaust fan, electrical power underground shall be deenergized, except power to monitoring equipment determined by MSHA to be intrinsically safe under 30 CFR part 18, and all persons shall be withdrawn from the mine.
( c ) If methane reaches 1.0 percent at a work place and there has been a failure of the main ventilation system, all persons shall be withdrawn from the mine.
[52 FR 24941, July 1, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 9615, Mar. 24, 1988]
<PAGE>

                                Exhibit 11
                        Calculation of Loss per Share

9 months ended September 30, 1997

Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding

                            Days    No.            Weighted
January 1, 1997             273     3,902,540     3,902,540
June 6, 1997 offering       116     1,250,000       531,136
June 30, 1997 repurchase     91       (22,380)       (7,460)

Total                               5,130,160     4,426,216


                                 Lit. m.        U.S.$000(1)
Loss                            (12,394)             (7,191)
Loss per Share                   (2,800)              (1.62)

(1) Converted to U.S.$ solely for the convenience of the reader at 1,724 lire 
per dollar, the approximate exchange rate as at September 30, 1997