alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 57.4201 Inspection.

(a) Firefighting equipment shall be inspected according to the following schedules:

(1) Fire extinguishers shall be inspected visually at least once a month to determine that they are fully charged and operable.

(2) At least once every twelve months, maintenance checks shall be made of mechanical parts, the amount and condition of extinguishing agent and expellant, and the condition of the hose, nozzle, and vessel to determine that the fire extinguishers will operate effectively.

(3) Fire extinguishers shall be hydrostatically tested according to Table C-1 or a schedule based on the manufacturer's specifications to determine the integrity of extinguishing agent vessels.

(4) Water pipes, valves, outlets, hydrants, and hoses that are part of the mine's firefighting system shall be visually inspected at least once every three months for damage or deterioration and use-tested at least once every twelve months to determine that they remain functional.

(5) Fire suppression systems shall be inspected at least once every twelve months. An inspection schedule based on the manufacturer's specifications or the equivalent shall be established for individual components of a system and followed to determine that the system remains functional. Surface fire suppression systems are exempt from these inspection requirements if the systems are used solely for the protection of property and no persons would be affected by a fire.

(b) At the completion of each inspection or test required by this standard, the person making the inspection or test shall certify that the inspection or test has been made and the date on which it was made. Certifications of hydrostatic testing shall be retained until the fire extinguisher is retested or permanently removed from service. Other certifications shall be retained for one year.

Table C-1—Hydrostatic Test Intervals for Fire Extinguishers

| Extinguisher type | Test interval (years) |
| --- | --- |
| Soda Acid | 5 |
| Cartridge-Operated Water and/or Antifreeze | 5 |
| Stored-Pressure Water and/or Antifreeze | 5 |
| Wetting Agent | 5 |
| Foam | 5 |
| AFFF (Aqueous Film Forming Foam) | 5 |
| Loaded Stream | 5 |
| Dry-Chemical with Stainless Steel Shells | 5 |
| Carbon Dioxide | 5 |
| Dry-Chemical, Stored Pressure, with Mild Steel Shells, Brazed Brass Shells, or Aluminum Shells | 12 |
| Dry-Chemical, Cartridge or Cylinder Operated, with Mild Steel Shells | 12 |
| Bromotrifluoromethane-Halon 1301 | 12 |
| Bromochlorodifluoromethane-Halon 1211 | 12 |
| Dry-Powder, Cartridge or Cylinder-Operated, with Mild Steel Shells1 | 12 |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| 1 Except for stainless steel and steel used for compressed gas cylinders, all other steel shells are defined as “mild steel” shells. | |
#### § 585.202 What types of leases will BOEM issue?

BOEM may issue commercial or limited leases for OCS activities under § 585.104. BOEM may issue a lease for OCS renewable energy research activities under § 585.239.
Exhibit 32.2

WRITTEN STATEMENT

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cogo Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Frank Zheng Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                 |  |     |  |                               
|---------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------
|November 5, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Frank Zheng               
|                 |  |     |  | Name: Frank Zheng             
|                 |  |     |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer



34
### §3369c. Notification of an active measures campaign

#### (a) Definitions

In this section:

#### (1) Appropriate congressional committees

The term "appropriate congressional committees" means—

(A) the congressional intelligence committees;

(B) the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives; and

(C) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

#### (2) Congressional leadership

The term "congressional leadership" includes the following:

(A) The majority leader of the Senate.

(B) The minority leader of the Senate.

(C) The Speaker of the House of Representatives.

(D) The minority leader of the House of Representatives.

#### (b) Requirement for notification

The Director of National Intelligence, in cooperation with the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the head of any other relevant agency, shall notify the congressional leadership and the chairman and vice chairman or ranking member of each of the appropriate congressional committees, and of other relevant committees of jurisdiction, each time the Director of National Intelligence determines there is credible information that a foreign power has, is, or will attempt to employ a covert influence or active measures campaign with regard to the modernization, employment, doctrine, or force posture of the nuclear deterrent or missile defense.

#### (c) Content of notification

Each notification required by subsection (b) shall include information concerning actions taken by the United States to expose or halt an attempt referred to in subsection (b).

(Pub. L. 116–92, div. E, title LXVII, §6703, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2223.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

For definition of "congressional intelligence committees", referred to in subsec. (a)(1)(A), see section 5003 of div. E of Pub. L. 116–92, set out as a note under section 3003 of this title.
Fourth Department,

October, 1960

(October 20, 1960)

#### In the Matter of Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, Respondent, v. Winfield S. Long et al., as Assessors of the Town of Erwin, Appellants. 1958 Assessment.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. (Appeal from order of Steuben Special Term denying motion by respondents to dismiss the petition.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, MeClusky and Henry, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q FOR
THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      20,167,512
<SECURITIES>                                21,686,705
<RECEIVABLES>                                  343,926
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            42,925,210
<PP&E>                                       1,087,798
<DEPRECIATION>                               (152,059)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,913,955
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,342,261
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,585
<OTHER-SE>                                  49,194,170
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,913,955
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,269,916
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,544,052)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,544,052)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,544,052)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Panavision Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John S. Farrand,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:


     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



  /S/ JOHN S. FARRAND
-------------------------
John S. Farrand
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
November 14, 2002

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF IMPSAT CORPORATION AND ITS CONSOLIDATED
SUBSIDIARIES AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         200,638
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,967
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,334
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               267,282
<PP&E>                                         290,822
<DEPRECIATION>                                 116,826
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 593,231
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          144,246
<BONDS>                                        384,567
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          125,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       100,793
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   593,231
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                93,651
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   82,518
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,358
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,158
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,718)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,251 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,969)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 57.15003 Protective footwear.

All persons shall wear suitable protective footwear when in or around an area of a mine or plant where a hazard exists which could cause an injury to the feet.
#### § 56.19120 Procedures for inspection, testing, and maintenance.

A systematic procedure of inspection, testing, and maintenance of shafts and hoisting equipment shall be developed and followed. If it is found or suspected that any part is not functioning properly, the hoist shall not be used until the malfunction has been located and repaired or adjustments have been made.
### §44746. Flight data recovery from overwater operations

(a) In General.—Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this section, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall complete a rulemaking proceeding to require that, not later than 5 years after the date of enactment of this section, all applicable aircraft are—

(1) fitted with a means, in the event of an accident, to recover mandatory flight data parameters in a manner that does not require the underwater retrieval of the cockpit voice recorder or flight data recorder;

(2) equipped with a tamper-resistant method to broadcast sufficient information to a ground station to establish the location where an applicable aircraft terminates flight as the result of such an event; and

(3) equipped with an airframe low-frequency underwater locating device that functions for at least 90 days and that can be detected by appropriate equipment.

(b) Applicable Aircraft Defined.—In this section, the term "applicable aircraft" means an aircraft manufactured on or after January 1, 2028, that is—

(1) operated under part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations;

(2) required by regulation to have a cockpit voice recorder and a flight data recorder; and

(3) used in extended overwater operations.

(Added Pub. L. 118–63, title III, §352(a), May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1112.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of enactment of this section, referred to in subsec. (a), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 118–63, which was approved May 16, 2024.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3535 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3535

 To amend the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 to require country of 
                  origin labeling for macadamia nuts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 28, 2005

   Mr. Case introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 to require country of 
                  origin labeling for macadamia nuts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELING REQUIRED FOR MACADAMIA NUTS.

    (a) General Requirement.--Section 281(2)(A)(vi) of the Agricultural 
Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1638(2)(A)(vi)) is amended by striking 
``peanuts'' and inserting ``peanuts and macadamia nuts''.
    (b) Requirements for United States Country of Origin.--Section 
282(a)(2)(E) of such Act (7 U.S.C. 1638a(a)(2)(E)) is amended by 
striking ``commodity or peanuts'' and inserting ``commodity, peanuts, 
or macadamia nuts''.
                                 <all>
```
----

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: March 12, 2010 |   /s/ John M. Lowber |
|----------------------|---------------------------|
|                 | John M. Lowber            |
|                 | Chief Financial Officer   |
|                 | GCI, Inc.                 |

----
CERTIFICATION, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD & PRESIDENT

                                  Exhibit 32.1


DOL RESOURCES, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

We, S. Mort  Zimmerman,  Chief Executive  Officer and Fred M.  Updegraff,  Chief
Financial Officer of DOL Resources,  Inc. (the "Company"),  certify, pursuant to
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (i)  this  Quarterly   Report  on  Form  10-QSB  fully  complies  with  the
          requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (ii) the  information  contained  in this report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of DOL Resources, Inc.




DATE: July 7, 2007


                                   /s/ S. MORT ZIMMERMAN
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                       S. Mort Zimmerman, Chairman of the Board,
                                       and Chief Executive Officer

                                   /s/ FRED M. UPDEGRAFF
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                       Fred M. Updegraff,
                                       Vice President, Chief Financial
                                       Officer, and Treasurer
#### John Molinari, Respondent, v. Garden Party House, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Judgment and order unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: Upon the record before us, the finding implicit in the verdict of the jury that any negligence of the Garden Party House, Inc., was a proximate cause of the accident was against the weight of evidence. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe Trial Term for plaintiff and against defendant Garden Party House, in an action for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by reason of unsafe place to work. The order denied a motion for a new trial.) Present — Williams, P. J. Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
### §46a. Repealed. July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title VII, §711, formerly title VI, §611, 58 Stat. 714; renumbered Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 958, §5, 60 Stat. 1049

Section, act Mar. 4, 1929, ch. 707, 45 Stat. 1644, provided for detailing of a Public Health Service medical officer to supervise care and maintenance of insane in Alaska and payment of his compensation and expenses.
#### David Schott, Appellant, v. Hertz Corp. et al., Respondents.

In an action to recover damages for personal injury, the plaintiff appeals: (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered October 15, 1962, denying his application for a general preference under the general preference rule; and (2) from an order of said court entered January 22, 1963, denying his motion for reconsideration on condition that defendants stipulate to the removal of the action to the County Court or the District Court of Nassau County, and directing that if defendants failed to so stipulate a general preference is granted. Appeal from order of October 15, 1962 dismissed. Said order was superseded by the order of January 22, 1963. The latter order denied a motion “for reconsideration”. But actually such motion was a renewed motion for a general preference (under the general preference rule) based on the additional facts that the defendant corporation was a nonresident of Nassau County and that at the time of the commencement of the action jurisdiction over such defendant could be obtained only in the Supreme Court. The order denying such a motion is appealable and supersedes the order on the original motion. Order of January 22, 1963, reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements; plaintiff’s renewed motion for a general preference granted; and action remitted to the Trial Term, Supreme Court, Nassau County, for the entry of an order giving an appropriate calendar preference-to the action (see *Mártir ana*v. *Valger,*19 A D 2d 544; *Slater*v. *Margolin,*13 A D 2d 450). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
§ 702.18 Reporting requirements. ( a ) ( 1 ) Following approval by the regulatory authority of an exemption for a mining area, the person receiving the exemption shall, for each mining area, file a written report annually with the regulatory authority containing the information specified in paragraph (b) of this section.
( 2 ) The report shall be filed no later than 30 days after the end of the 12-month period as determined in accordance with the definition of *Cumulative measurement period* in § 702.5 of this part.
( 3 ) The information in the report shall cover: ( i ) Annual production of coal and other minerals and annual revenue derived from coal and other minerals during the preceding 12-month period, and
( ii ) The cumulative production of coal and other minerals and the cumulative revenue derived from coal and other minerals.
( b ) For each period and mining area covered by the report, the report shall specify: ( 1 ) The number of tons of extracted coal sold in bona fide sales and total revenue derived from such sales;
( 2 ) The number of tons of coal extracted and used or transferred by the operator or related entity and the estimated total fair market value of such coal;
( 3 ) The number of tons of coal stockpiled;
( 4 ) The number of tons of other commercially valuable minerals extracted and sold in bona fide sales and total revenue derived from such sales;
( 5 ) The number of tons of other commercially valuable minerals extracted and used or transferred by the operator or related entity and the estimated total fair market value of such minerals; and
( 6 ) The number of tons of other commercially valuable minerals removed and stockpiled by the operator.
#### LIVESEY et al., Appellants, v. JONES, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 16, 1903.)

Action by Mary Edith Livesey and James Livesey. against Jane T. Jones, as executrix, etc., of Samuel B. Jones, deceased.

No .opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
### §1909. Fiscal year 1992 funding

#### (a) Authorization of appropriations to Fund

There is hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Fund for fiscal year 1992 the sum of $150,000,000.

#### (b) Authorization of obligations from Fund

During fiscal year 1992, there may be obligated from the Fund such amounts as may be provided in appropriations Acts, not to exceed $35,000,000. Amounts made available for obligation from the Fund for fiscal year 1992 shall remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 102–183, title VIII, §809, Dec. 4, 1991, 105 Stat. 1277.)