alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9505 

To authorize the establishment of a program of voluntary separation incentive 

payments for nonjudicial employees of the District of Columbia courts 

and employees of the District of Columbia Public Defender Service. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2024 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To authorize the establishment of a program of voluntary 

separation incentive payments for nonjudicial employees 

of the District of Columbia courts and employees of 

the District of Columbia Public Defender Service. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia 

5 Courts and Public Defender Service Voluntary Separation 

6 Incentive Payments Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9505 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR PROGRAM OF VOLUNTARY 

2 SEPARATION INCENTIVE PAYMENTS FOR DIS3 TRICT OF COLUMBIA COURTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 17 of title 11, District 

5 of Columbia Official Code, is amended by inserting after 

6 section 11–1726 the following new section: 

7 ‘‘§ 11–1726A. Voluntary separation incentive pay8 ments 

9 ‘‘The Joint Committee on Judicial Administration 

10 may, by regulation, establish a program substantially simi11 lar to the program established under subchapter II of 

12 chapter 35 of title 5, United States Code, for nonjudicial 

13 employees of the District of Columbia courts, except that 

14 the maximum amount of the payment made under the pro15 gram to any individual may not exceed the amount re16 ferred to in section 3523(b)(3)(B) of title 5, United States 

17 Code.’’. 

18 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

19 of chapter 17 of title 11, District of Columbia Official 

20 Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to 

21 section 11–1726 the following new item: 

‘‘11–1726A. Voluntary separation incentive payments.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 9505 IH

1 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR PROGRAM OF VOLUNTARY 

2 SEPARATION INCENTIVE PAYMENTS FOR DIS3 TRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC DEFENDER 

4 SERVICE. 

5 Section 305 of the District of Columbia Court Re6 form and Criminal Procedure Act of 1970 (sec. 2–1605, 

7 D.C. Official Code) is amended by adding at the end the 

8 following new subsection: 

9 ‘‘(e) The Director may establish a program substan10 tially similar to the program established under subchapter 

11 II of chapter 35 of title 5, United States Code, for employ12 ees of the Service, except that the maximum amount of 

13 the payment made under the program to any individual 

14 may not exceed the amount referred to in section 

15 3523(b)(3)(B) of title 5, United States Code.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### § 556.405 When must I notify BOEM of mergers, name changes, or changes of business form?

You must notify BOEM of any merger, name change, or change of business form as soon as practicable, but in no case later than one year after the earlier of the effective date or the date of filing the change or action with the Secretary of State or other authorized official in the State of original registry.
### §1152. Joinder and intervention in aviation proceedings

A person interested in or affected by a matter under consideration in a proceeding or a civil action to enforce section 1132, 1134(b) or (f)(1) (related to an aircraft accident), or 1155(a) of this title, or a regulation prescribed or order issued under any of those sections, may be joined as a party or permitted to intervene in the proceeding or civil action.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(d), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 756.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1152 | 49 App.:1489. | Aug. 23, 1958, Pub. L. 85–726, §1009, 72 Stat. 796. |
| | 49 App.:1655(d) (1st sentence). | Oct. 15, 1966, Pub. L. 89–670, §6(d) (1st sentence), 80 Stat. 938. |
| | 49 App.:1903(a)(1)(A). | Jan. 3, 1975, Pub. L. 93–633, §304(a)(1)(A), 88 Stat. 2168. |

Section

The words "civil action" are substituted for "proceedings . . . begun originally in any court of the United States" for consistency with rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (28 App. U.S.C.). The words "section 1132, 1134(b) or (f)(1) (related to an aircraft accident), or 1155(a) of this title" are substituted for "the provisions of this chapter" in 49 App.:1489 because 49 App.:1489 is taken from 49 App.:ch. 20 and the sections in quotations restate the relevant provisions of 49 App.:ch. 20 carried out by the National Transportation Safety Board. The remaining relevant provisions of 49 App.:ch. 20 are restated in part A of subtitle VII of the revised title, and provisions comparable to this section are included as section 46109 of the revised title. The word "rule" is omitted as being synonymous with "regulation". The word "requirement" is omitted as included in "order". The words "or any term, condition, or limitation of any certificate or permit" are omitted because the Board does not have authority to issue certificates or permits. The words "may be joined as a party or permitted to intervene" are substituted for "it shall be lawful to include as parties, or to permit the intervention of" for clarity. The text of 49 App.:1489 (words after semicolon) is omitted as surplus.
§ 56.14115 Stationary grinding machines. Stationary grinding machines, other than special bit grinders, shall be equipped with— ( a ) Peripheral hoods capable of withstanding the force of a bursting wheel and enclosing not less than 270° of the periphery of the wheel;
( b ) Adjustable tool rests set so that the distance between the grinding surface of the wheel and the tool rest in not greater than 1 ⁄ 8 inch; and
( c ) A safety washer on each side of the wheel.
[53 FR 32521, Aug. 25, 1988; 53 FR 44588, Nov. 4, 1988]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of First Community Financial Corporation, (the
Company) for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Jody D. Graybill, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                        |  |     |  |                              
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: February 26, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ Jody D. Graybill         
|                        |  |     |  | Jody D. Graybill, President  
|                        |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit
      31.1**




**RULE
      13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)**  ****  **CERTIFICATIONS**





I,
      Laura
      Koran, certify that:





1.  I
      have
      reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Capital Resource Funding, Inc.
      (the “Company”).





2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,
      the periods presented in this report;





4.  The
      Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-15d-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:





(a)  Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the Company, including its consolidates subsidiaries,
      is
      made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
      in which this report is being prepared;





(b)  Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation; and





(c)  Disclosed
      in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter that has
      materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s
      internal control over financial reporting; and





5.  The
      Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s
      auditors and the audit committee of Company’s board of directors (or persons
      performing the equivalent functions):





(a)  All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
      financial information; and





(b)  Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial
      reporting.





Date:
      July 14, 2006








By:  /s/
      Laura Koran


Laura
      Koran


Chief
      Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial information.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000027673
<NAME> JOHNDEERECAPITALCORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             168
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,209
<ALLOWANCES>                                        81
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                              35
<DEPRECIATION>                                      16
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,560
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                          2,445
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           113
<OTHER-SE>                                         915
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,560
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   719
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      117
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    41
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 270
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    189
<INCOME-TAX>                                        65
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                124
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       124
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
### §5561. Definition

In this chapter, "civic and cultural activities" includes libraries, musical and dramatic presentations, art exhibits, adult education programs, public meeting places, and other facilities for carrying on an activity any part of which is supported under a law of the United States.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(d), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 851.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 5561 | 49 App.:1653(i)(10). | Oct. 15, 1966, Pub. L. 89–670, 80 Stat. 931, §4(i)(10); added Oct. 28, 1974, Pub. L. 93–496, §§6, 15, 88 Stat. 1530, 1533; Feb. 5, 1976, Pub. L. 94–210, §707(3), 90 Stat. 125; May 30, 1980, Pub. L. 96–254, §206(a), 94 Stat. 412. |

Section

In this chapter, both sections 6 and 15 of the Amtrak Improvement Act (Public Law 93–496, 88 Stat. 1528, 1533) are listed as source credits for the addition of section 4(i) to the Department of Transportation Act (Public Law 89–670, 80 Stat. 931). This is done to conform to the probable intent of Congress as evidenced by the directory language of section 15 of the Act of October 28, 1974.

In this section, the words "for community groups, convention visitors and others" are omitted as unnecessary.
EXHIBIT 99.1





                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Amended Annual Report of RADA Electronics Industries Ltd.
(the  "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2001 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Amended  Annual
Report"),  I, Adar Azancot,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-OxleY Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Amended  Annual  Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Amended Annual Report fairly presents,
in all material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
the Company.







/s/Adar Azancot
---------------
Adar Azancot
Chief Executive Officer
August 29, 2002
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAURA FUJISAWA, et al.

Plaintiff(s),

v.

COMPASS VISION, INC., etal.,

Defendant(s).

))))))))))))

No. C07-5642 BZ

Related Cases: C07-3431 BZ     C08-4118 BZ     C09-2016 BZ

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

Inasmuch as the related cases have all been stayed, IT IS

ORDERED that henceforth, all Fujisawa pretrial and trial

documents shall not be filed in the related cases unless there

is a specific need to do so.  

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Wilson v. Compass Vision, 

C07-3431 is dismissed with prejudice, the Court understanding

that this matter has been settled.  

Any party who objects to any portion of this Order shall

file an objection by February 22, 2010.

Dated: February 10, 2010 

     Bernard Zimmerman

  United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\FUJISAWA V. COMPASS VISION\ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION.wpd

Case 3:09-cv-02016-BZ   Document 54   Filed 02/10/10   Page 1 of 1
H. R. 9487 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four 

An Act 

To amend the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1970 to authorize the Legislative 

Counsel of the House of Representatives to designate more than one of the 

attorneys of the Office of the Legislative Counsel as a Deputy Legislative Counsel, 

and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘House Office of Legislative 

Counsel Modernization Act’’. 

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF MULTIPLE DEPUTY LEGISLATIVE COUNSELS. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—Section 522(b)(1) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1970 (2 U.S.C. 282a(b)(1)) is amended— 

(1) by amending the first sentence to read as follows: ‘‘The 

Legislative Counsel shall designate one or more of the attorneys 

appointed under subsection (a) as a Deputy Legislative 

Counsel.’’; and 

(2) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘the Deputy Legislative Counsel shall perform the functions of the Legislative 

Counsel.’’ and inserting ‘‘the functions of the Legislative 

Counsel shall be performed by a Deputy Legislative Counsel. 

If there is more than one Deputy Legislative Counsel, the 

Deputy Legislative Counsel who shall perform such functions 

shall be determined in accordance with the order specified 

in a notice filed with the Speaker and the Minority Leader 

of the House by the Legislative Counsel.’’. 
H. R. 9487—2 

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 522(b)(2) of such Act 

(2 U.S.C. 282a(b)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘Deputy Legislative 

Counsel’’ and inserting ‘‘Deputy Legislative Counsels’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-89,540-01

EX PARTE COLLIN SMITH, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. D-1-DC-05-500237-A IN THE 390TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and

sentenced to fifty-two years’ imprisonment. The Third Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. 

Smith v. State, No. 03-07-00094-CR (Tex. App. — Austin, 2008) (not designated for publication).

Applicant contends, among other things, that histrial counsel rendered ineffective assistance 1

because trial counsel failed to object to various improper statements made by the prosecutor during

This Court has considered Applicant’s other claims and finds them to be without merit. 1
2

closing arguments, failed to challenge a venire member who had a hearing impairment, and failed

to object when the trial judge participated in the plea negotiations. 

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. The

trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the

appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the

performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient

performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and

conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for

habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must
3

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: March 6, 2019

Do not publish
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1716 To what depth must I remove wellheads and casings? ( a ) Unless the District Manager approves an alternate depth under paragraph (b) of this section, you must remove all wellheads and casings to at least 15 feet below the mud line.
( b ) The District Manager may approve an alternate removal depth if: ( 1 ) The wellhead or casing would not become an obstruction to other users of the seafloor or area, and geotechnical and other information you provide demonstrate that erosional processes capable of exposing the obstructions are not expected; or
( 2 ) You determine, and BSEE concurs, that you must use divers, and the seafloor sediment stability poses safety concerns; or
( 3 ) The water depth is greater than 1,000 feet.
[76 FR 64462, Oct. 18, 2011, as amended at 84 FR 21985, May 15, 2019]
EXHIBIT
99.30  April 14,
2009
 
 VIA EMAIL AND OVERNIGHT
DELIVERY
 
 Mr.
Michael W. Klinger
 22420
Crooked Creek Road
 Cicero,
IN 46034
 
 Re:
              Board of Director
      Approval of Termination of Employment for
  Cause
 
 Mr.
Klinger,
 
 The Board
of Directors of EDCI Holdings, Inc. (“EDCI”) hereby provides you written notice
of its  approval of the immediate termination of your employment by
EDCI for Cause in accordance with, and for the reasons set forth in, the letter
of April 13, 2009 (attached hereto as Exhibit A) from EDCI’s Chief Executive
Officer, Mr. Robert L. Chapman, Jr.  Defined terms have the meaning
set forth in the letter agreement dated October 3, 2008 between EDCI and
you.
 
 You are
directed, in accordance with EDCI policies that you have previously agreed to,
to make arrangements with Kyle E. Blue for the return of all property of EDCI
(or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates) in your possession within 24 hours of
receipt of this letter.  Such property includes, without limitation,
any computers, telephones, pagers, other electronic devices, documents of any
kind (whether physical or digital), access badges, keys, equipment, credit
cards, or ID badges.  You are also reminded that you remain bound by
various obligations, including obligations of confidentiality, as a result of
your prior employment, either expressly or as a result of fiduciary or other
duties, and that EDCI will vigorously enforce any breaches of such
obligations.
 
 
 Regards,
 
 
 
 
 ____________________
 Signed on behalf of:
 Clarke H. Bailey
 Chairman of the Board of
Directors
 
 By Matthew K. Behrent
 EVP Corporate Development