alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32-4



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT


I, David E. Meador, Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of The Detroit Edison Company (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that to the best of my knowledge and belief:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
    of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30,
    2003 (the Report) fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|
| | (2) the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                          



| |                                                         
| | --------------------------------------------------------
| | /S/ DAVID E. MEADOR                                     
| | _______________________________________                 
| | DAVID E. MEADOR                                         
| | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
    Officer of
| | The Detroit Edison Company                              

Dated: November 7, 2003
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.204 How must I protect the rights of the Federal government? ( a ) To protect the rights of the Federal government, you must either: ( 1 ) Drill and produce the wells that the Regional Supervisor determines are necessary to protect the Federal government from loss due to production on other leases or units or from adjacent lands under the jurisdiction of other entities (e.g., State and foreign governments); or
( 2 ) Pay a sum that the Regional Supervisor determines as adequate to compensate the Federal government for your failure to drill and produce any well.
( b ) Payment under paragraph (a)(2) of this section may constitute production in paying quantities for the purpose of extending the lease term.
( c ) You must complete and produce any penetrated hydrocarbon-bearing zone that the Regional Supervisor determines is necessary to conform to sound conservation practices.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Clyde A. Guhr, Appellant.

Appeals by defendant: (1) from an order of the County Court, Nassau County, dated September 15', 1958, denying after a hearing his *coram nobis*application to vacate a judgment of said court rendered July 22, 1953, convicting him, on iis plea of guilty, of the crimes of burglary in the second degree, burglary in the third degree, grand larceny in the first degree, grand larceny in the second degree, and petit larceny, and sentencing him on all but the last count to various terms of imprisonment to be served concurrently with the term of 7% to 15 years imposed on the first count of burglary in the second degree; and (2) from an order of said court dated September 15, 1958, denying without a hearing another *coram nobis*application by defendant to vacate said judgment. Orders affirmed. No opinion. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 243 (Thursday, December 17, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 81875]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27789]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-52-2020]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 38--Spartanburg County, South Carolina, 
Application for Production Authority, Teijin Carbon Fibers, Inc. 
(Polyacrylonitrile-Based Carbon Fiber); Invitation for Public Comment 
on Rebuttal Submission

    Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.32(c)(2), the FTZ Board is inviting public 
comment on the rebuttal submission of Teijin Carbon Fibers, Inc. (TCF) 
(dated November 10, 2020) that contains new or expanded argument or 
evidence. The rebuttal submission was presented in the context of the 
FTZ Board's consideration of the pending application requesting certain 
authority for TCF to produce polyacrylonitrile-based carbon fiber at 
its facility in Greenwood, South Carolina within FTZ 38. In response to 
this invitation for public comment, parties may also address argument 
or evidence presented in the application and in other parties' 
submissions in response to the initial invitation for public comment on 
the application (85 FR 49359, August 13, 2020). The application and 
parties' submissions may be viewed in the Online FTZ Information System 
on the FTZ Board's website (accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz).
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. The closing 
period for their receipt is January 19, 2021. Rebuttal comments in 
response to material submitted during the foregoing period may be 
submitted during the subsequent 15-day period to February 1, 2021. 
Submissions shall be addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary and 
sent to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2f495b556f5b5d4e4b4a01484059"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0167757b4175736065642f666e77">[email protected]</span></a>.
    For further information, contact Diane Finver at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b6f2dfd7d8d398f0dfd8c0d3c4f6c2c4d7d2d398d1d9c0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="32765b535c571c745b5c4457407246405356571c555d44">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 482-1367.

    Dated: December 14, 2020.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-27789 Filed 12-16-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 57.9312 Working around drawholes.

Unless platforms or safety lines are used, persons shall not position themselves over drawholes if there is danger that broken rock or material may be withdrawn or bridged.
EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|Subsidiaries                       |  | Percentage Owned (1) |  | State of Incorporation
|---------------------------------- |  | -------------------- |  | ----------------------
|The Peoples Bank and Trust Company |  | 100%                 |  | Alabama               
|The Peoples Agency, Inc. (2)       |  | 100%                 |  | Alabama               
|Loan Express, Inc. (2)             |  | 100%                 |  | Alabama               



|(1) |  | At December 31, 2002.
|--- |  | ---------------------



|(2) |  | Second-tier subsidiary, 100% owned by The Peoples Bank and Trust Company.
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------



---
(June 10, 1960)

#### J. & H. Stolow et al., v. Scott Publications, Inc., et al.

Motion for stay denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente and Bergan, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with Quarterly Report of Comtech Group, Inc. and its
subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Jeffrey Kang, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |        |  |                        
|------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: May 15, 2006 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Jeffrey Kang       
|                    |  | Name:  |  | Jeffrey Kang           
|                    |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of E

. L

. A

. III and J. E

. A , Child ren

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 8

- 00 75 1

- CV

Trial court case number: 201 7

- 0 350 1J

Trial court: 3 1 3 th Dist rict Court of Harris County

Appellant, E .L. A., Jr. , has filed a n unopposed motion for an extension of time to

file his brief. The motion is granted

. Appellant’s brief is due to be filed with this

Court no later than Monday

, November 5 , 2018. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 28.4(a), 38.6(d).

This appeal involve s the termination of the parent

- child relationship

. This Court is

required to bring the appeal to final disposition within 180 days of August 2 0 , 2018, the

date the notice of appeal was filed, so far as reasonab ly possible. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin.

6.2, reprinted in Tex. Gov’t. Code Ann., tit. 2, subtit. F app. (Vernon 2013).

Accordingly, no further extensions will be granted absent extraordinary

circumstances.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: October 25 , 2018
§ 556.701 How do I seek approval of an assignment of the record title interest in my lease, or a severance of operating rights from that record title interest? ( a ) The Regional Director will provide the form to record an assignment of record title interest in a Federal OCS oil and gas or sulfur lease, or a severance of operating rights from that record title interest. You must submit to BOEM two originals of each instrument that transfers ownership of record title within 90 days after the last party executes the transfer instrument. You must pay the service fee listed in § 556.106 with your request and your submission must include evidence of payment via *pay.gov.*
( b ) Before BOEM approves an assignment or transfer, it must consult with, and consider the views of, the Attorney General. The Secretary may act on an assignment or transfer if the Attorney General has not responded to a request for consultation within 30 days of said request.
( c ) A new record title owner or sublessee must file a designation of operator, in accordance with § 550.143 of this chapter, along with the request for the approval of the assignment.
EXHIBIT
99.7
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          71,023
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,911
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,784,502
<PP&E>                                      43,468,171
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,522,725
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,143,753
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,911,406
<BONDS>                                     32,712,165
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (20,559,393)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,143,753
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,775,626
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,858,158
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,975,462
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,457,494)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,457,494)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (166.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HEAT AND FROST INSULATORS AND ASBESTOS WORKERS, LOCAL NO. 27, A. F. L.

No. 15019.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

March 18, 1954.

David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations *581Board, and A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Clif Langsdale and John J. Manning, Kansas City, Mo., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Order of National Labor Relations Board enforced, on petition for enforcement and stipulation filed with Board.
§ 57.6131 Location of explosive material storage facilities. ( a ) Storage facilities for any explosive material shall be— ( 1 ) Located so that the forces generated by a storage facility explosion will not create a hazard to occupants in mine buildings and will not damage dams or electric substations; and
( 2 ) Detached structures located outside the blast area and a sufficient distance from powerlines so that the powerlines, if damaged, would not contact the magazines.
( b ) Operators should also be aware of regulations affecting storage facilities in 27 CFR part 55, in particular, 27 CFR 55.218 and 55.220. This document is available at any MSHA Metal and Nonmetal Safety and Health district office.
Editorial Note on Part 1206
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1206 (formerly part 206) appear at 67 FR 19111, Apr. 18, 2002.

§ 1206.155 What are my reporting requirements under an arm's-length transportation contract? ( a ) You must use a separate entry on form ONRR-2014 to notify ONRR of an allowance based on transportation costs that you or your affiliate incur(s).
( b ) ONRR may require you or your affiliate to submit arm's-length transportation contracts, production agreements, operating agreements, and related documents.
( c ) You can find recordkeeping requirements in parts 1207 and 1212 of this chapter.
### §1681c. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–357, title II, §203(d), Oct. 19, 1982, 96 Stat. 1708

Section, Pub. L. 96–205, title II, §201(a), Mar. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 85, related to the payment of the salary and expenses of the government comptroller for the Northern Mariana Islands from funds appropriated to the Department of the Interior.
Appeal No. 76-370.

#### Barbara B. Kerney *v.*Bruce E. Kerney.

*Ray H. Durfee,*for plaintiff.

*William W. Corcoran,*for defendant.

The defendant’s motion to affirm the judgment below pursuant to Rule 16(g) is denied.

Bevilacqua, C. J., and Joslin, J., not participating.
### UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D

.C.

WALKERAG SUPPLY, LLC, et al Complainant, 

### v. WAHOO AIRPORT AUTHORITY, WAHOO MUNICIPAL AIRPORT Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )



### ORDER FAA Docket No

. 16-14-08

On November 7, 2014, counsel for Respondent Wahoo Airport Authority, Wahoo, Nebraska filed a motion for an extension of time in which to file an Answer, on behalf of Respondent in the above-captioned proceeding. Upon receipt, the FAA contacted the Respondent to determine whether the request for extension was coordinated with the Complainant. On November 18, the Respondent filed an amended motion for a request for an extension oftime "in order for it to be able to reasonably review and evaluate the 917 pages ofdocuments prior to filing its answer." The Respondent adds that these "documents make references to numerous dates , events and action which must be diligently investigated in order to reasonably respond to the complaint. " The Motion sta tes that the Respondent counsel contacted counsel for the Complainant to obtain concurrence for an extension, however "the response was not definitive. ,. On November 24, the Complainant filed an Answer to the Respondent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint, opposing the Respondent's request for extension. The Motion alleges Respondent's actions were not in compliance with the filing requirements , under 14 CFR Part 16, and that the Motion approval is an unnecessary delay. The Director has duly considered the Complainant' s objections and notes that under 14 C.F.R. 

### § 16.11, the Federal Aviation Administration may grant extensions of time "where necessary or appropriate for a fair and complete hearing ofmatters before the agency." Furthermore the Director finds that an extension of time is not unreasonable under the circumstances.2



### Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: Respondent' s Motion for an Extension ofTime is granted. The Respondent may file its Answer, on or before December 19, 2014. Complainant may file a Reply within ten days of the date of service ofthe Answer.

Director, Office ofAirport Compliance and

Management Analysis I Date Issued

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on December 2._, 2014, I caused to be placed in the United States mail (first class mail, postage prepaid) or personally delivered, a true copy ofthe foregoing document addressed to:
Attorney for Complainant: William foster Better Airports, LLC 4504 North Versailles Avenue Dallas, TX 75205-3015
Attorneys for Respondent: Larry S

. Kaplan Kaplan, Massamillo & Andrews, LLC 200 West Madison Street l6 1h Floor Chicago, Illinois 60606

FAA Part 16 Proceedings Docket Office ofAirport Compliance, AC0

- 1 00

# ~~2r~ Claudia Roberts Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis 3
### §404i. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 404i, comprising section 114 of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as section 3050 of this title.
#### Janet Naegele, as Executor of Rose Cale, Deceased, Respondent, v Archdiocese of New York, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[833 NYS2d 79]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan A. Madden, J.), entered October 19, 2005, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied the motion of defendant Archdiocese to dismiss the causes of action against it pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) for failure to state a cause of action and as barred by the applicable statute of limitations, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted and the second and third causes of action dismissed as to defendant Archdiocese. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Plaintiff’s claims sounding in respondeat superior and negligent supervision are based on the premise that because archdiocesan priests and pastors are modestly paid and the Archdiocese knows that priests accept money and things of value from their parishioners, it was reasonably foreseeable that Monsignor Woolsey, the pastor of St. John the Martyr Church, would exercise undue influence over his elderly parishioner, Ms. Cale, to obtain more than $490,000 from her for his own benefit. However, deeming such allegations to be true and according plaintiff every favorable inference, such conclusory allegations are insufficient to show that the Archdiocese knew or should have known of Monsignor Woolsey’s propensity to commit the tortious acts alleged. The failure to establish this necessary element of a negligent supervision claim negates the employer’s liability as a matter of law *(see Kenneth R. v Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn,*229 AD2d 159, 161 [1997], *cert denied*522 US 967 [1997], *lv dismissed*91 NY2d 848 [1997]). Moreover, the Monsignor’s alleged tortious conduct, which may be character*271ized as exercising undue influence, overreaching, fraud or even theft, was not in furtherance of archdiocesan business and was a clear departure from the scope of his employment, having been committed for wholly personal motives *(see N.X. v Cabrini Med. Ctr.,*97 NY2d 247, 251 [2002]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.E, Andrias, Sullivan and McGuire, JJ.
Exhibit No. 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) of The Peoples BancTrust Company, Inc.
(the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby each certify that to the best of our knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered
in the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|                                                    
|/s/ Elam P. Holley, Jr.                             
|Elam P. Holley, Jr.                                 
|President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                                                    
|/s/ Andrew C. Bearden, Jr.                          
|Andrew C. Bearden, Jr.                              
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



March 23, 2005

(Date)
§ 585.408 May I assign my lease or grant interest? ( a ) You may assign all or part of your lease or grant interest, including record title, to one or more parties, subject to BOEM approval under this subpart. Each instrument that creates or transfers an interest must describe the entire tract or describe by officially designated subdivisions the interest you propose to create or transfer. Your application to assign a lease or grant may include a request to modify the existing lease or grant period schedule consistent with § 585.235(d).
( b ) If you submit an application to assign a lease or grant, you will continue to be responsible for payments that are or become due on the lease or grant until the date BOEM approves the assignment.
( c ) The assignment takes effect on the first day of the month following the date on which BOEM approves your request, unless you request an earlier effective date and BOEM approves that earlier date, but such earlier effective date, if prior to the date of BOEM's approval, does not relieve you of your obligations accrued between that earlier effective date and the date of approval.
( d ) You do not need to request an assignment for business mergers, name changes, or changes of business form. You must notify BOEM of these events under § 585.110.