alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 12.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Elan Sigal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-f of RADA Electronic Industries
Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
Subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Reserved]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 30, 2006
/s/ Elan Sigal *
----------------
Elan Sigal
Chief Financial Officer

     * The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at
the Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b)



In connection with the Annual Report of Gallery of History, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Rod Lynam, Chief Financial Office of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge, that:

1.	 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presented, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



                                   /s/ Rod Lynam
                                   ---------------
                                   Rod Lynam
                                   Chief Financial Officer

December 29, 2004




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Cardima, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned,
      in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
      The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





*Date:
                May 21, 2007*
              
              */s/
                Gabriel B. Vegh*
              
              *Gabriel
                B. Vegh*
              *Chairman,
                Chief Executive Officer, and Acting Chief Financial Officer*
*Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published

and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50469

(Summary Calendar)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOHNNY MARION MCCOY,

Defendant-Appellant.

.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(W-95-CR-107)

July 7, 1997

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Johnny Marion McCoy appeals his convictionsfor interstate transportation of a stolen motor

vehicle (18 U.S.C. § 2312) and interstate transportation ofstolen property valued at $5,000 or more

(18 U.S.C. § 2314), alleging that the evidence wasinsufficient to support his convictions. McCoyalso

argues that a material variance existed between the indictment and the evidence presented at trial.

This argument also amounts to a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. After a careful review
2

of the record, briefs and authorities, we find that the evidence was sufficient for a reasonable jury to

find McCoy guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. United states v. Parziale, 947 F.2d 123, 127-28 (5th

Cir. 1991) (considering defendant’s sufficiency of the evidence argument based on his conviction

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2314). 

The jury was entitled to infer based on the totality of the evidence adduced that McCoy had

the requisite criminal intent to steal the truck and its contents, either when he left Texas or shortly

thereafter. See United States v. Merkt, 764 F.2d 266, 272 (5th Cir. 1985). In addition, McCoy has

failed to present evidence showing that, if there was a variance between the indictment and the

evidence presented at trial, his substantial rights were prejudiced. United States v. Massey, 827 F.2d

995, 1003 (5th Cir. 1987). Thus, McCoy’s appeal fails on both grounds. Accordingly, McCoy’s

convictions are AFFIRMED.
### §2821. Repealed. Pub. L. 112–239, div. C, title XXXI, §3131(q)(2), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 2183

Section, Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLVIII, §4851, formerly Pub. L. 105–85, div. C, title XXXI, §3153(f), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 2044; renumbered Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLVIII, §4851, and amended Pub. L. 108–136, div. C, title XXXI, §3141(k)(15), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1786, required Secretary of Energy to submit to Congress semiannual reports on local impact assistance provided during the preceding six months.
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Altria Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin J. Barrington, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ MARTIN J. BARRINGTON                       
|Martin J. Barrington                           
|Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
|July 1, 2015
### SUBCHAPTER II—ANTI-BOYCOTT ACT OF 2018
EXHIBIT 13.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Annual Report of Levon Resources Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Annie Chan, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: June 26, 2014
By:
/s/ Annie ChanAnnie ChanPrincipal Financial Officer
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the annual report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 10.13A

                          LEASE EXTENSION AGREEMENT

      AGREEMENT made this 9th day of March, 2000 between APOLLO DEVELOPMENT
CORP. ("Landlord") and INTELLIGENT CONTROLS, INC. ("TENANT").

      WHEREAS the parties have a lease between them currently in force,
covering property in the Saco, Maine Industrial Park, which lease is dated
April 11, 1991, with a lease extension agreement dated January 4, 1999,
with a termination date of October 31, 2000, and

      WHEREAS the parties desire to extend the term of said lease, as set
forth herein,

      NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the mutual promises herein made,
the parties agree that the termination date of said lease shall be extended
to October 31, 2003.  During the extension period the rent shall be as
follows:

      November 1, 2000 to October 31, 2001, $5,757.70 per month payable in
advance.
      November 1, 2001 to October 31, 2002, $5,930.43 per month payable in
advance.
      November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2003, $6,108.34 per month payable in
advance.

      The period for exercise of the option to purchase the leased property
(set forth in paragraph 20 of said original lease) is also extended to the
new lease termination date of October 31, 2003.  The 2% increase factor in
the option purchase price shall be computed over the entire period
(including the extensions terms) as applicable.

      In all other respects the lease terms are ratified and confirmed.

      Executed at Saco, Maine, on the above date.

Witnessed by:                          APOLLO DEVELOPMENT CORP.

/s Abby Graffam                        BY /s Clifford A Purvis
-------------------------                 ----------------------------
                                       It Treasurer     Landlord

                                       INTELLIGENT CONTROLS, INC.

/s Sharon Binnette                     BY /s Roger E. Brooks
-------------------------                 ----------------------------
                                       Its President    Tenant
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No s . 45004 & 45005

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

MARCUS DAMIEN EVANS ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 201 8 Unpublished Opinion No. 304

Filed: January 5, 2018

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Bannock County. Hon. Stephen S. Dunn , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of seven years, with a minimum period of confinement of three years, for possession of a controlled substance

, affirmed ; and judgment of conviction and unified sentence of seven years, with a minimum period of confinement of three years, for possession of forged notes or bank bills

, affirmed

. Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Reed P. Anderson , Deput y Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; HUSKEY, Jud ge; and LORELLO, Judge

________________________________________________
PER CURIAM

In Docket No. 45004, Marcus Damien Evans pleaded guilty to one count of possession of

a controlled substance

, methamphetamine, Idaho Code § 37

- 2732(c)(1) . The district court imposed a unified sentence of seven years, with three years fixed

. In Supreme Court Docket Number 45005, Evans pleaded guilty to one count of possession of forged bank bills or notes,

I .C. § 18

- 3605

. Th e district court imposed a unified sentence of seven years, with three years

fixed. Evans appeals, contending that his sentence s are excessive.2 Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
Therefore, Evans ’s judgment s of conviction and sentence s are affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

            Pursuant  to  section  906  of  the   Sarbanes-Oxley   Act  of  2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code),  the  undersigned  officer of Brilliant  Digital  Entertainment,  Inc., a
Delaware  corporation (the  "Company"),  does hereby certify with respect to the
Quarterly  Report of the Company on Form  10-QSB for the quarter  ended June 30,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "10-QSB Report")
that:

(1)      the 10-QSB Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the information  contained in the 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date August 17, 2005                         /S/ KEVIN BERMEISTER
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Kevin Bermeister
                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                         and Acting Chief Financial Officer
#### § 57.4530 Exits for surface buildings and structures.

Surface buildings or structures in which persons work shall have a sufficient number of exits to permit prompt escape in case of fire.
EXHIBIT 14


                           CODE OF ETHICAL CONDUCT FOR
                     SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS AND MANAGERS
                        ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
                                ON JULY 28, 2004


     This  Code  of  Ethical  Conduct  (this  "CODE")  of  National   Scientific
Corporation  (the  "COMPANY")  provides  principles to which the chief executive
officer,  chief financial  officer and all other senior  financial  managers set
forth on Schedule A hereto (the "FINANCIAL MANAGERS") are expected to adhere and
advocate.  In carrying  out his or her  responsibilities  to the  Company,  each
Financial  Manager  should,  to the best of his or her  knowledge  and  ability,
adhere to, promote and advocate the following  principles  and  responsibilities
governing his or her professional and ethical conduct and:

     1.   Conduct his or herself with honesty and  integrity and avoid actual or
          apparent  conflicts  of  interest  between  his  or her  personal  and
          professional  relationships  and disclose to the Chairman of the Audit
          Committee  and  the  General  Counsel  of  the  Company  any  material
          transaction or relationship  that reasonably could be expected to give
          rise to such a conflict.

     2.   Provide full, fair, accurate,  timely and understandable disclosure in
          internal  reports as well as documents  filed with or submitted to the
          Securities and Exchange Commission or used in public communications by
          or on behalf of National  Scientific  Corporation and its subsidiaries
          and affiliates.

     3.   Comply with  applicable  rules and  regulations of federal,  state and
          local  governments and other private and public  regulatory  agencies,
          including but not limited to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

     4.   Act  in  good  faith,  responsibly,  with  due  care,  competence  and
          diligence  and without  knowingly  misrepresenting  material  facts or
          allowing his or her independent judgment to be subordinated.

     5.   Respect the  confidentiality of information  acquired in the course of
          his or her work except when authorized or otherwise  legally obligated
          to make disclosure.

     6.   Promptly report to the Chairman of the Audit Committee AND the General
          Counsel any breach of this Code of which he or she becomes aware.



<PAGE>

                           SCHEDULE A (TO EXHIBIT 14)

                               FINANCIAL MANAGERS



Michael Grollman
Graham Clark
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON,

 Respondent,

 v.

GOMER CARL SPOTTEDBEAR,

 Appellant.

No. 84134-3-I

DIVISION ONE

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

BOWMAN, J. — A jury convicted Gomer Carl Spotted Bear of one count of 

domestic violence third degree assault, committed on November 29, 2021. 

Spotted Bear argues he is entitled to resentencing because the State did not 

prove the existence of any prior felony convictions used to calculate his offender 

score. The State concedes the error. We agree and remand for resentencing.

1

 

In its presentence report, the State included a written summary of Spotted 

Bear’s criminal history, asserting he had five prior felony convictions and was on 

community custody at the time of the offense. As a result, it calculated his 

offender score at 7 and his standard sentence range at 33 to 43 months. At 

sentencing, the court agreed and sentenced Spotted Bear to a special drug 

offender sentencing alternative with 19 months of confinement and 19 months of 

community custody. Spotted Bear appeals the calculation of his offender score. 

 

1 Spotted Bear also claims instructional error. But two months after he filed his 

opening brief, the parties discovered he relied on erroneous language in an inaccurate 

verbatim report of proceedings. The parties then jointly moved to amend the transcript, 

which we granted. Because the amended transcript shows that the trial court did not 

give the instruction to which Spotted Bear assigns error, we do not address the issue.
No. 84134-3-I/2

2

We review a sentencing court’s calculation of an offender score de novo. 

State v. Wilson, 113 Wn. App. 122, 136, 52 P.3d 545 (2002). At sentencing, the 

State must prove the existence of prior convictions by a preponderance of the 

evidence. State v. Hunley, 175 Wn.2d 901, 909-10, 287 P.3d 584 (2012).2 Such 

evidence may include certified copies of prior judgments, comparable documents 

of record, or transcripts of prior proceedings. Wilson, 113 Wn. App. at 136. But 

bare assertions of a defendant’s criminal history are not enough to satisfy the 

State’s burden. Hunley, 175 Wn.2d at 910. 

Here, the State presented no evidence of Spotted Bear’s prior convictions. 

Accordingly, we accept the State’s concession and remand for resentencing. On 

remand, both parties may present any evidence relevant to ensure the accuracy 

of Spotted Bear’s criminal history. State v. Jones, 182 Wn.2d 1, 10-11, 338 P.3d 

278 (2014).

WE CONCUR:

 

2 The State may be relieved of this burden if the defendant affirmatively 

acknowledges his offender score and criminal history. Hunley, 175 Wn.2d at 917. 

Spotted Bear did not do so.