alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN JUDGE.COM, INC. QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,571
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,200,445
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,076,112
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,091,430
<PP&E>                                       5,421,310
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,333,371
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,836,005
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,258,572
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       139,843
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,836,005
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,320,518
<CGS>                                       17,893,603
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,112,134
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               232,505
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               140,210
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             248,947
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                975,879
<INCOME-TAX>                                    56,725
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            919,154
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   919,154
<EPS-BASIC>                                      $0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.06


</TABLE>
#### § 582.2 Scope.

The rules and regulations in this part apply as of their effective date to all operations conducted under a mineral lease for OCS minerals other than oil, gas, or sulphur issued under the provisions of section 8(k) of the Act.
#### § 57.22205 Doors on main fans (I-A, II-A, III, and V-A mines).

In mines ventilated by multiple main fans, each main fan installation shall be equipped with noncombustible doors. Such doors shall automatically close to prevent air reversal through the fan. The doors shall be located so that they are not in direct line with explosive forces which could come out of the mine.
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.735 What associated systems and related equipment must all BOP systems include? All BOP systems must include the following associated systems and related equipment: ( a ) An accumulator system (as specified in API Standard 53, incorporated by reference in § 250.198). Your accumulator system must have the fluid volume capacity and appropriate pre-charge pressures in accordance with API Standard 53. If you supply the accumulator regulators by rig air and do not have a secondary source of pneumatic supply, you must equip the regulators with manual overrides or other devices to ensure capability of hydraulic operations if rig air is lost;
( b ) An automatic backup to the primary accumulator-charging system. The power source must be independent from the power source for the primary accumulator-charging system. The independent power source must possess sufficient capability to close and hold closed all BOP components under MASP conditions as defined for the operation;
( c ) At least two full BOP control stations. One station must be on the rig floor. You must locate the other station in a readily accessible location away from the rig floor;
( d ) The choke line(s) installed above the bottom well-control ram;
( e ) The kill line must be installed beneath at least one well-control ram, and may be installed below the bottom ram;
( f ) A fill-up line above the uppermost BOP;
( g ) Locking devices for all BOP sealing rams (*i.e.*, blind shear rams, pipe rams and variable bore rams), as follows: ( 1 ) For subsea BOPs, hydraulic locking devices must be installed on all sealing rams;
( 2 ) For surface BOPs: ( i ) Remotely-operated locking devices must be installed on blind shear rams no later than April 29, 2019;
( ii ) Manual or remotely-operated locking devices must be installed on pipe rams and variable bore rams; and
( h ) A wellhead assembly with a RWP that exceeds the maximum anticipated wellhead pressure.
[81 FR 26022, Apr. 29, 2016, as amended at 84 FR 21981, May 15, 2019]
#### § 57.4262 Underground transformer stations, combustible liquid storage and dispensing areas, pump rooms, compressor rooms, and hoist rooms.

Transformer stations, storage and dispensing areas for combustible liquids, pump rooms, compressor rooms, and hoist rooms shall be provided with fire protection of a type, size, and quantity that can extinguish fires of any class in their early stages which could occur as a result of the hazards present.
#### In re TIFFANY. In the matter of the application of Chapin Tiffany for a writ of mandamus.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November 24, 1903.)

No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

WEST BAY ONE, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 10-481 (RMC/JMF)

ENID EDDINGS; CRYSTAL PABREZIS; 

and DOES 1-726,

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Fran Laker (“Laker”) has become aware of the existence of a subpoena served upon an

Internet Service Provider (“ISP”) that might disclose whether he downloaded illegally a film. 1

Plaintiff is the copyright owner of this film and served that subpoena. 

As the matter now stands, Laker has not yet been named as a defendant but has moved to

quash the subpoena on the grounds that (1) the subpoena was not served on him; (2) he lives

more than 100 miles from the District of Columbia; (3) the subpoenas “imposed an undue

burden on Movants that raises significant constitutional questions;” and (4) the underlying case

must be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction, lack of subject matter jurisdiction and

mootness. Motion to Quash Subpoens [sic] [#100] at 1. According to Laker, “[i]t is improper to

impose on a third party the burden of any subpoena . . . in aid of a case that does not belong in

this Court in the first place.” Id.

 “Fran” may be a man or woman’s name. I am guessing a man and apologize if I have guessed 1

wrong. 
First, Laker relies on Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, but the rights

granted by that Rule may be asserted only by the person subject to the subpoena, unless a

privilege in the matters to be disclosed is asserted by a third party. Novak v. Capital Mgmt. &

Development Corp., 241 F.R.D 389, 394 (D.D.C. 2007). The only possible “privilege” that

Laker could claim is in the disclosure by the ISP of his identity. But, that ship has sailed; Laker 2

has identified himself on the public record, obviating any concern about his “privacy”. 

Second, Laker has not been served with the subpoena and it does not impose any burden

on him whatsoever. If Laker is trying to move to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction over

his person or the subject matter, he will have to wait until he is in fact named as a defendant. As

Judge Collyer has pointed out, the defenses he may have to liability are not at issue merely 3

because a subpoena was served on an ISP. 

It is therefore, hereby,

ORDERED that the Motion to Quash Subpoens [sic] [#100] is DENIED. I note that

Laker, if named as a defendant, reserves all of the defenses he may have to this action.

SO ORDERED.

_____________________________

JOHN M. FACCIOLA

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 Judge Collyer has concluded, as have many other judges, that there is no such privilege. West 2

Bay One, Inc. v. Does 1-1,653, 270 F.R.D. 13, 15 (D.D.C. 2010).

 See Memorandum Opinion [#36] at 5. 3

2
3
§ 1227.500 What functions may a State perform to ensure that reporters correct erroneous report data? Production data and royalty data must be edited to ensure that what is reported is correct, that disbursement is made to the proper recipient, and that correct data are used for other functions, such as automated verification and audits. If you request delegation of error correction functions for production reports or royalty reports, or both, you must perform at least the following: ( a ) Correcting all fatal errors and assigning appropriate confirmation indicators;
( b ) Verifying whether production reports are missing;
( c ) Contacting production reporters or royalty reporters about missing reports and resolving exceptions;
( d ) Documenting all corrections made, including providing production reporters or royalty reporters with confirmation reports of any changes;
( e ) Providing training and assistance to production reporters or royalty reporters;
( f ) Issuing notices, orders to report, and bills as needed, including, but not limited to, imposing assessments on a person who chronically submits erroneous reports; and
( g ) Providing assistance to ONRR for appealed demands or orders, including preparing field reports, performing remanded actions, modifying orders, and providing oral and written briefing and testimony as expert witnesses.
[62 FR 43084, Aug. 12, 1997, as amended at 75 FR 61087, Oct. 4, 2010]
Sagaal Talaabo oo Hoos Loogu Dhigayo Qatarta 

Covid-19 ee Shaqaalaha Hilibka, Diyaaarinta Digaaga, 

hilibka Doofarka iyo Xarumaha Baakadayntooda

Babdaadi adiga iyo dadka kula shaqeeya ee kugu xeeran. Qaad 

talaabooyinkan xitaa hadii aadan lahayn astaamaha Covid-19.

OSHA 4059-07 2020 — 9 Steps to Reducing Worker Exposure to COVID-19 in Meat, Poultry, and Pork Processing and Packaging Facilities (Somali)

Joog guriga hadii aad 

xanuunsantahay.

➊

Xiro qalabka difaaca ee loogu 

talagalay nabadgalyada guud 

iyo sidii loo xadidi lahaa 

faafista fayraska.

➐

Iska ilaali isku imaatin 

kooxeedyada inta lagu 

jiro nasashada shaqada 

xitaa hadii bananka lajoogo.

➌ Kadhig qayb qayb 

meesha wax soo saarka 

si loo hubiyo masaafada 

isku jirka.

➍

➎ Iska ilaali wadaagista 

qalabka. Si joogto ah u 

nadiifi qalabka ay tahay 

qasabka in la wadaago.

Wargali kormeerahaaga 

ama OSHA wixi kula soo 

gudboonada ee ku saabsan 

nabadgalyada caafimaad.

➑

➏ Istacmaal biyo iyo 

sabuun marka aad 

gacmaha dhaqayso.

➋ Joogtee ugu yaraan 

lix fiid masaafada 

udhaxaysa shaqalaha.

1-800-321-OSHA (6742)

TTY 1-877-889-5627

www.osha.gov

Waaxda Shaqaalaha, amniga 

shaqada iyo maamulka 

caafimaadka ee Mareykanka

Iska ilaali baabuurta shaqada 

hadii ay suurto gal tahay.

➒

Noqo qof lasocdo arimaha caafimaad 

ee bulshada. Wixii macluumaad dheeri 

ah, booqo www.osha.gov/coronavirus

or call 1-800-321-OSHA (6742).
EXHIBIT 4.1


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

               CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION, PREFERENCES AND RIGHTS

                                       OF

                      SERIES B CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK

                                       OF

                                 ZENASCENT, INC.

 (Pursuant to ss.151(g) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware)

     Zenascent, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), does hereby
certify as follows:

     FIRST: The current name of the Corporation is Zenascent, Inc.

     SECOND: The first sentence of Section 4(a) of the Certificate of
Designation is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

     In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company,
     either voluntarily or involuntarily, the Holders shall be entitled to
     receive, immediately after any distributions to Senior Securities required
     by the Company's Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, or any
     certificate(s) of designation, and prior in preference to any distribution
     to Junior Securities, but on parity with any distribution to the holders of
     Parity Securities, an aggregate amount equal to the sum of (i) $2,430,000
     and (ii) any due but unpaid dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock (the
     "Liquidation Preference").

     THIRD: The first sentence of Section 6(a) of the Certificate of Designation
is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

     Each Holder may, at any time at the sole option of the Holder, convert
     whole shares of Series B Preferred Stock into fifty (50) fully-paid and
     non-assessable shares of Common Stock, subject to adjustment as provided in
     Section 6(d).

     FOURTH: The amendments set forth above to the Corporation's Certificate of
Amendment of Certificate of Designation have been duly adopted and written
consent thereto has been given in accordance with the provisions of Sections 228
and 141(f) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of
Amendment to be signed as of the 16th day of October, 2002.




                                      -----------------------------------------
                                      James DiLorenzo, Vice President
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



With reference to the Annual Report of Cambridge Display Technology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Fyfe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/    DAVID FYFE                                
|David Fyfe Chief Executive Officer March 30, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                             5
<LEGEND>

This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from DREXEL
BURNHAM  LAMBERT REAL ESTATE  ASSOCIATES  III 1999 Fourth  Quarter 10-KSB and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-KSB filing.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                 0000761657
<NAME>                         DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES III
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1,000


<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                        5,836
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    23
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                        7,650
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               13,509
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                       7,650
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                        0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  8,269
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              1,700
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              2,012
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              866
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   0
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (312)
<DISCONTINUED>                                1,162
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  24
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                    874
<EPS-BASIC>                                   12.49 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0
<FN>

<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.

</FN>


</TABLE>
#### ERSKINE v. ERSKINE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 16, 1903.)

Action by John K. Erskine against Marie A. Erskine.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs.
§ 57.8534 Shutdown or failure of auxiliary fans. ( a ) Auxiliary fans installed and used to ventilate the active workings of the mine shall be operated continuously while persons are underground in the active workings, *except* for scheduled production-cycle shutdowns or planned or scheduled fan maintenance or fan adjustments where air quality is maintained in compliance with the applicable standards of subpart D of this part, and all persons underground in the affected areas are advised in advance of such scheduled or planned fan shutdowns, maintenance, or adjustments.
( b ) In the event of auxiliary fan failure due to malfunction, accident, power failure, or other such unplanned or unscheduled event: ( 1 ) The air quality in the affected active workings shall be tested at least within 2 hours of the discovery of the fan failure, and at least every 4 hours thereafter by a competent person for compliance with the requirements of the applicable standards of subpart D of this part until normal ventilation is restored, or
( 2 ) All persons, except those working on the fan, shall be withdrawn, the ventilation shall be restored to normal and the air quality in the affected active workings shall be tested by a competent person to assure that the air quality meets the requirements of the standards in subpart D of this part, before any other persons are permitted to enter the affected active workings.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 6, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-11328

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE NAVARRETE-FIERRO, also known as Jose Luis Fierro, also

known as Ricardo Navarro, also known as Jose Luis Navarrete,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas 

USDC No. 1:06-CR-23-1

--------------------

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose NavarreteFierro (Navarrete) raises arguments that are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense. Navarrete also raises arguments

that are foreclosed by United States v. Mejia-Huerta, 480 F.3d

713, 723 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed, 75 U.S.L.W.

3585 (U.S. Apr. 18, 2007) (No. 06-1381), which held that the
No. 06-11328

-2-

district court is not required to provide notice prior to

sentencing of its sua sponte intention to impose a non-Guidelines

sentence. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
### §2153. Special rules for other employees for service abroad

#### (a) Special computation rule

Notwithstanding any provision of chapter 84 of title 5, the annuity under subchapter II of such chapter of a retired employee of the Agency who is not designated under section 2152(a) of this title and who has served abroad as an employee of the Agency after December 31, 1986, shall be computed as provided in subsection (b).

#### (b) Computation

#### (1) Service abroad

The portion of the annuity relating to such service abroad shall be computed as provided in section 8415(e) of title 5.

#### (2) Other service

The portions of the annuity relating to other creditable service shall be computed as provided in section 8415 of such title that is applicable to such service under the conditions prescribed in chapter 84 of such title.

(Pub. L. 88–643, title III, §303, as added Pub. L. 102–496, title VIII, §802, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3244; amended Pub. L. 112–96, title V, §5001(c)(2)(G), Feb. 22, 2012, 126 Stat. 200.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 303 of Pub. L. 88–643, as added Pub. L. 99–335, title V, §506, June 6, 1986, 100 Stat. 626, related to special rules for other employees for service abroad and was set out as a note under section 403 of this title prior to the general amendment of Pub. L. 88–643 by section 802 of Pub. L. 102–496.

#### Amendments

2012—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 112–96 substituted "section 8415(e)" for "section 8415(d)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on first day of fourth month beginning after Oct. 24, 1992, see section 805 of Pub. L. 102–496, set out as a note under section 2001 of this title.
### **CHAPTER 4C—ATOMIC WEAPONS AND SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIALS INFORMATION REWARDS**

Sec.
47a.
Information concerning illegal introduction, manufacture, acquisition or export of special nuclear material or atomic weapons or conspiracies relating thereto; reward.
47b.
Determination by Attorney General of entitlement and amount of reward; consultation; Presidential approval.
47c.
Aliens; waiver of admission requirements.
47d.
Hearings; rules and regulations; conclusiveness of determinations of Attorney General.
47e.
Certification of award; approval; payment.
47f.
Definitions.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 29, 2022 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-22-00614-CV

SPRING CREEK PLA INVEST ORS, LLC, Appellant V. VICTORIA ROMOLO, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 005-04135-2021

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justi ce Molberg, and Justice Goldstein Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Before the Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal because the
parties have settled their diffe rences. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

220614F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III / ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

SPRING CREEK PLA INVESTORS, LLC, Appellant

No. 05-22-00614-CV V.

VICTORIA ROMOLO, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 005-04135- 2021. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Molberg and Goldstein participating.

In accordance with this Court’s op inion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. Subject to any agreement between the parties, it is ORDERED that appellee VICTORIA ROMOLO recover her costs of this appeal from appellant SPRING CREEK PLA INVESTORS, LLC.

Judgment entered August 29, 2022