alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Rupprecht Law P. A.

3 24 Datura Street , Suite 200 | West Palm Beach, FL 33401 P: (561) 222

- 6979 | E : jon@jrupprechtlaw.com | W: www.jrupprechtlaw.com

Ju ly 15 , 2015 U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12

- 140, Washington, DC 20590

RE: A dditional I nfo rmation for Drone Service Systems, Inc. ( Docket FAA

- 2015

- 1950 ) Regarding Why Granting the Petition Will Benefit the Public.

Dear Sir or Madam: The Petitioner intends to produce picture and video content. If the petitioner does not have the option of using the Petitioner’s UA, the only other way to obtain the aerial footage is by using manned
aircraft which pose a danger to the pilot as well as individuals on the ground. There are no pilots on board the UA and due to the small size of the UA, there is less risk posed to the public on the ground in case of an emergency. Additionally, the UA has multiple motors while most manned aircraft have only one engine. Manned airplanes and helicopters produce great amounts of noise pollution disrupting the quiet enjoyment of private property of the public on the ground. UA are much quieter and will not disrupt the public as much as manned aircraft; thus, the public will benefit from a reduction in noise pollution. In addition to the noise pollution reduction, engine or turbine powered aircraft produce exhaust which affects the environment while the UA of the petitio ner are electric and do not produce any emission. The environment and the public are benefited by the use of UA.2

UA use batteries for power which are not as flammable and explosive as 100LL or Jet A. If there was an emergency where the UA crashed, there is less chance of individuals being injured from an explosion or fire. UA also use smaller propellers than manned helicopters which will cause far less damage in the case of a crash than the “grenading” that typically happens during a manned helicopter
crash

. Lastly, the UA will be operated at lower altitudes than manned aircraft. Thus, the public benefits because the danger of a mid

- air collision is lessened If I can be of any assistance to further expedite this petition, please do not hesitate to contact me at (561)222

- 6979 or at my email jon@jrupprechtlaw.com

Sincerely yours,

_____________________ Jonathan Rupprecht, Esq.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9496 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to include a representative of the 

National Association of State Veterans Homes on the Geriatrics and 

Gerontology Advisory Committee of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2024 

Mrs. CHAVEZ-DEREMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to include a representative of the National Association of State Veterans 

Homes on the Geriatrics and Gerontology Advisory Committee of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9496 IH

1 SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF REPRESENTATIVE OF NATIONAL 

2 ASSOCIATION OF STATE VETERANS HOMES 

3 ON DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

4 GERIATRICS AND GERONTOLOGY ADVISORY 

5 COMMITTEE. 

6 Section 7315(a) of title 38, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) by inserting ‘‘, in consultation with the 

9 President of the National Association of State Vet10 erans Homes with respect to matters concerning 

11 such association’’ after ‘‘Under Secretary for 

12 Health’’; and 

13 (2) by inserting ‘‘and one representative of the 

14 National Association of State Veterans Homes who 

15 holds a professional license in nursing home admin16 istration’’ before the period at the end of the second 

17 sentence. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
### SUBCHAPTER VII—TRIAL PROCEDURE
### §2742. Reprogramming

#### (a) In general

Except as provided in subsection (b) and in sections 2750 and 2751 of this title, the Secretary of Energy may not use amounts appropriated pursuant to a DOE national security authorization for a program—

(1) in amounts that exceed, in a fiscal year—

(A) 115 percent of the amount authorized for that program by that authorization for that fiscal year; or

(B) $5,000,000 more than the amount authorized for that program by that authorization for that fiscal year; or

(2) which has not been presented to, or requested of, Congress.

#### (b) Exception where notice-and-wait given

An action described in subsection (a) may be taken if—

(1) the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees a report referred to in subsection (c) with respect to such action; and

(2) a period of 30 days has elapsed after the date on which such committees receive the report.

#### (c) Report

The report referred to in this subsection is a report containing a full and complete statement of the action proposed to be taken and the facts and circumstances relied upon in support of the proposed action.

#### (d) Computation of days

In the computation of the 30-day period under subsection (b), there shall be excluded any day on which either House of Congress is not in session because of an adjournment of more than three days to a day certain.

#### (e) Limitations

#### (1) Total amount obligated

In no event may the total amount of funds obligated pursuant to a DOE national security authorization for a fiscal year exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated by that authorization for that fiscal year.

#### (2) Prohibited items

Funds appropriated pursuant to a DOE national security authorization may not be used for an item for which Congress has specifically denied funds.

(Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLVII, §4702, formerly div. C, title XXXVI, §3621, Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2757; renumbered div. D, title XLVII, §4702, and amended Pub. L. 108–136, div. C, title XXXI, §3141(j)(2)(A)–(D)(i), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1781; Pub. L. 113–66, div. C, title XXXI, §3146(h)(1), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 1080.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 7386a of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 108–136.

#### Amendments

2013—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 113–66 substituted "this subsection" for "subsection (a)".

2003—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 108–136, §3141(j)(2)(D)(i), in introductory provisions, made technical amendment to reference in original act which appears in text as reference to sections 2750 and 2751 of this title.
#### Lillian Boehlert, Appellant, v. Board of Education of Utica City School District et al., Respondents.

Appeal dismissed unless typewritten records and briefs are filed and served on or before August 10, 1960. Respondent’s brief must be filed and served by August 26 if ease is to be argued at September 1960 Term of court. Appellant’s motion granted to appeal on original transcript of record, 5 typewritten copies of other papers constituting record on appeal, and 5 typewritten copies of brief.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of FCStone Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the
period ended August 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul G. Anderson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                                         
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------
|By: |  | /S/    PAUL G.
ANDERSON                 
|    |  | Paul G. Anderson Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 5, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.187 What are BSEE's incident reporting requirements? ( a ) You must report all incidents listed in § 250.188(a) and (b) to the District Manager. The specific reporting requirements for these incidents are contained in §§ 250.189 and 250.190.
( b ) These reporting requirements apply to incidents that occur on the area covered by your lease, right-of-use and easement, pipeline right-of-way, or other permit issued by BOEM or BSEE, and that are related to operations resulting from the exercise of your rights under your lease, right-of-use and easement, pipeline right-of-way, or permit.
( c ) Nothing in this subpart relieves you from making notifications and reports of incidents that may be required by other regulatory agencies.
( d ) You must report all spills of oil or other liquid pollutants in accordance with 30 CFR 254.46.
#### § 57.22237 Actions at 2.0 to 2.5 percent methane in bleeder systems (I-A and III mines).

If methane reaches 2.0 percent in bleeder systems at the point where a bleeder split enters a main return split, mining shall not be permitted on ventilation splits affected by the bleeder system. If methane has not been reduced to less than 2.0 percent within 30 minutes, or if methane levels reach 2.5 percent, all persons other than competent persons necessary to take corrective action shall be withdrawn from affected areas.
### §46309. Concession and price violations

(a) Criminal Penalty for Offering, Granting, Giving, or Helping To Obtain Concessions and Lower Prices.—An air carrier, foreign air carrier, ticket agent, or officer, agent, or employee of an air carrier, foreign air carrier, or ticket agent shall be fined under title 18 if the air carrier, foreign air carrier, ticket agent, officer, agent, or employee—

(1) knowingly and willfully offers, grants, or gives, or causes to be offered, granted, or given, a rebate or other concession in violation of this part; or

(2) by any means knowingly and willfully assists, or willingly allows, a person to obtain transportation or services subject to this part at less than the price lawfully in effect.

(b) Criminal Penalty for Receiving Rebates, Privileges, and Facilities.—A person shall be fined under title 18 if the person by any means—

(1) knowingly and willfully solicits, accepts, or receives a rebate of a part of a price lawfully in effect for the foreign air transportation of property, or a service related to the foreign air transportation; or

(2) knowingly solicits, accepts, or receives a privilege or facility related to a matter the Secretary of Transportation requires be specified in a currently effective tariff applicable to the foreign air transportation of property.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1238.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 46309(a) | 49 App.:1472(d)(1). | Aug. 23, 1958, Pub. L. 85–726, §902(d)(1), 72 Stat. 785; Jan. 3, 1975, Pub L. 93–623, §8(b), 88 Stat. 2105. |
| 46309(b) | 49 App.:1472(d)(2). | Aug. 23, 1958, Pub. L. 85–726, 72 Stat. 731, §902(d)(2); added Jan. 3, 1975, Pub. L. 93–623, §8(b), 88 Stat. 2106. |
| | 49 App.:1551(b)(1)(E). | Aug. 23, 1958, Pub. L. 85–726, 72 Stat. 731, §1601(b)(1)(E); added Oct. 4, 1984, Pub. L. 98–443, §3(e), 98 Stat. 1704. |

Section

In this section, the words "fined under title 18" are substituted for "a fine of not less than $100 and not more than $5,000" and "fined not less than $100, nor more than $5,000" for consistency with title 18. The words "for each offense" are omitted as surplus. The words "fares, or charges" are omitted as surplus because of the definition of "rate" in section 40102(a) of the revised title.

In subsection (a), before clause (1), the word "representative" is omitted as surplus. The words "shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor" are omitted as superseded by 18:3559. The words "and, upon conviction thereof" are omitted as surplus. In clause (2), the words "device or" and "suffer or" are omitted as surplus.

In subsection (b), before clause (1), the words "by any means" are substituted for "in any manner or by any device" for consistency in this section and to eliminate unnecessary words. In clauses (1) and (2), the word "foreign" is added for clarity because only foreign air transportation has regulated prices. In clause (1), the word "rebate" is substituted for "refund or remittance" for consistency in this section. In clause (2), the word "favor" is omitted as being included in "privilege".
DEPUTY CLERK IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

No. 84187



# FILED MAR 2 1 2022 DAVID MAFFIT, Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE MONICA TRUJILLO, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition challenging a district court order denying mandamus and/or prohibition relief in which petitioner sought dismissal of the criminal complaint and requested a jury trial.

Having considered the petition and supporting documentation, we are not convinced that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted because petitioner has not demonstrated that a direct appeal from a judgment of conviction would not be "a plain, speedy and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law." NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330; Pan v. Eighth judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted); Srnith v. Eighth Ju.dicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is an

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 08SO (0) 1947A 04610extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining

whether to entertain a writ petition). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Pariaguirre

Hardesty

Stiglich

cc: Hon. Monica Trujillo, District Judge The Pariente Law Firm, P.C. Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5 
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE FORM 10-QSB OF BRILLIANT DIGITAL
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. TO WHICH THIS EXHIBIT IS A PART AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER
SHARE DATA).

</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                              MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                          6,841
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     201
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     (93)
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                7,123
<PP&E>                                                            688
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  (287)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  7,806
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           1,449
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                            7
<OTHER-SE>                                                      6,350
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    7,806
<SALES>                                                            74
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                   74
<CGS>                                                               8
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   1,143
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 (995)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      (1)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             (996)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (996)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   (.14)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.13

                                    AGREEMENT

         This Agreement is made as of April 30, 1998 between WESTAR FINANCIAL
SERVICES INCORPORATED , a Washington corporation (the "Company") and CATHY
CARLSON (the "Lender").

                                    RECITALS

<PAGE>



         A.       The Company executed and delivered to Lender a promissory note
                  in the principal amount of $100,000 dated January 15, 1997
                  (the "Note").

         B.       The Note matured on May 15, 1997.

         C.       The Parties are entering into this Agreement to extend the
                  maturity date for payment of the Note.

                                    AGREEMENT

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

1. MATURITY DATE.  The maturity date of the Note is hereby extended to 
May 31, 1998.

2. SUBORDINATION. The Bank One Security Interest shall be and remain at all
times a lien or charge on the Residual Interest, prior and superior to the lien
or charge of Lender under the Lender Security Agreement.

3. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SUBORDINATION. Lender acknowledges that it hereby
intentionally waives, relinquishes and subordinates the priority and superiority
of the lien or charge of the Lender Security Agreement in favor of the lien or
charge of the Bank One Security Interest upon the Residual Interest, and
understands that in reliance upon and in consideration of this waiver,
relinquishment and subordination, specific loans and advances are being and will
be made and specific monetary and other obligations are being and will be
entered into by third parties which would not be made or entered into but for
such reliance upon this waiver, relinquishment and subordination. Lender agrees
to execute such further documents as either Bank One or the Company may
reasonably request to reflect, implement or confirm such subordination.

4. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the whole agreement between the
parties hereto with respect to its subject matter, and supersedes all prior
agreements whether written or oral.

5. BINDING EFFECT. This Agreement shall enure to the benefit of and be binding
upon the legal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns of the parties.

6. CONTINUING EFFECT. Except as specifically modified or amended hereby, the
Note and the Lender Security Agreement shall continue in full force and effect
in accordance with their terms.


<PAGE>


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the
date first written above.

                                     CATHY L. CARLSON

                                     By:
                                        ---------------------------
                                     Individual

                                     WESTAR FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.

                                     By:
                                        ---------------------------
                                     Thomas M. Foley
                                     Vice-president, Finance
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 95 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 95

  To amend title 54, United States Code, to increase public access to 
                  recreational areas on Federal land.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2023

  Mr. Biggs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 54, United States Code, to increase public access to 
                  recreational areas on Federal land.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Increasing Public Access to 
Recreation Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE FOR RECREATIONAL PUBLIC ACCESS.

    Subsection (c) of section 200306 of title 54, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``3 percent'' and inserting ``10 percent''; 
        and
            (2) by striking ``$15,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$50,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```