alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
unaudited financial statements contained in the Company's Form 10-QSB and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS   
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998 
<CASH>                                     1853103
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              235707  
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           2088810
<PP&E>                                     258372
<DEPRECIATION>                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             2350542  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      42483
<BONDS>                                    0
<COMMON>                                   537500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0 
<OTHER-SE>                                 1770559
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               2350542
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           40468
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              15343
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            25125
<INCOME-TAX>                               10300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        14825
<DISCONTINUED>                             0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0   
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               14825
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0 
        

</TABLE>
PUBLIC LAW 114–314—DEC. 16, 2016 130 STAT. 1535 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6400: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

Dec. 7, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 9, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–314 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To revise the boundaries of certain John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 

System units in New Jersey. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL BARRIER 

RESOURCES SYSTEM MAP. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The map subtitled ‘‘Seidler Beach Unit NJ– 

02, Cliffwood Beach Unit NJ–03P, Conaskonk Point Unit NJ–04’’, 

dated August 1, 2014, that is included in the set of maps entitled 

‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources System’’ referred to in section 4(a) of 

the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) and relating 

to certain John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System units 

in New Jersey, is hereby replaced by another map subtitled ‘‘Seidler 

Beach Unit NJ–02/NJ–02P, Cliffwood Beach Unit NJ–03P, 

Conaskonk Point Unit NJ–04, Sayreville Unit NJ–15P, Matawan 

Point Unit NJ–16P’’ and dated October 7, 2016. 

(b) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior shall keep 

the replacement map referred to in subsection (a) on file and available for inspection in accordance with section 4(b) of the Coastal 

Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)). 

Approved December 16, 2016. 

16 USC 3503 

note. 

Dec. 16, 2016 

[H.R. 6400] 


ralbany on LAP520R082 with PUBLIC LAW
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
RENT-A-WRECK OF AMERICA INC.'S FORM 10-KSB FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-KSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,007,578
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,590,929
<ALLOWANCES>                                   779,035
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,999,545
<PP&E>                                         791,155
<DEPRECIATION>                                 448,472
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,593,943
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          808,526
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           14,391
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        42,347
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,698,590
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,593,943
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,785,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,549,286
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,499,134
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               203,217
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,096
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                599,930
<INCOME-TAX>                                    62,439
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            537,491
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   537,491
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
### §1423k. Right of petition

The legislature or any person or group of persons in Guam shall have the unrestricted right of petition. It shall be the duty of all officers of the government to receive and without delay to act upon or forward, as the case may require, any such petition.

(Aug. 1, 1950, ch. 512, §21, 64 Stat. 389.)
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of First Community Financial Corporation, (the Company) for the period ended December 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Richard R. Leitzel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the
Report.



|      |  |               |  |  |  |     |  |                                           
|----- |  | ------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------
|      |  |               |  | 
|      |  |               |  | 
|Date: |  | March 9, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    Richard R. Leitzel                 
|      |  |               |  |  |  |     |  |                                           
|      |  |               |  |  |  |     |  | Richard R. Leitzel,Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of General Communication, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ronald A. Duncan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


Date:  February 16, 2005                /s/
                                       Ronald A. Duncan
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       General Communication, Inc.


                                        1
<PAGE>
          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of General Communication, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John M. Lowber, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.



Date:  February 16, 2005                /s/
                                       John M. Lowber
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       General Communication, Inc.



                                        2
§ 553.25 What financial test procedures must I use to determine the amount of self-insurance allowed as OSFR evidence based on net worth? ( a ) Divide the total amount of the stockholders'/owners' equity listed on the balance sheet by ten.
( b ) Divide the net amount of the identifiable U.S. assets by the net amount of the identifiable total assets.
( c ) Multiply the net amount of plant, property, and equipment shown on the balance sheet by the number calculated under paragraph (b) of this section and divide the resultant product by ten.
( d ) The smaller of the numbers calculated under paragraphs (a) or (c) of this section is the maximum allowable amount you may use to demonstrate OSFR under this method.
Memorandum 

U.S. Department of 

Transportation 

Office of the Secretory 

of TransportatiOn 

Subject: 

From: 

To: 

Notice of Communication in Docket: 

DOT -OST -OST -2012-0029 

Special Rules for Ronald Reagan 

Airport (beyond-perimeter ""v"·""*' 

Secretary Ray LaHood 

Chief, Dockets 

In accordance with 

communication. 

rules ( 14 CFR Part 3 

Date: MARt 9 2012 

On March 28, 2012, during a telephone conversation with Senator Barbara Boxer 

of California, the Senator raised the subject of the Department's proceeding to 

allocate eight slot exemptions to new entrant and/or limited incumbent carriers for 

operations between Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA) and 

airports beyond the 1,250-mile DCA perimeter. The Senator expressed her support 

for the applications proposing nonstop service from DCA to San Francisco and San 

Diego. 

I informed the Senator that, while I appreciated her interest in this case, I could not 

comment on its merits because the proceeding was under active consideration by 

the Department. 

Please place this memorandum in the appropriate Docket. 

cc: Senator Barbara Boxer
#### Sam Perry, Jr., Respondent, *v.*Kingston City Transportation Corp., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Third Department,

July 15, 1963.

*Rosen <& Rosen (Paul Rosen*of counsel), for appellant.

*Rose M. Frederiokson, Michael Nardone*and *John R. Davison*for respondent.

Bergan, P. J.

In 1944 plaintiff, then 2% years old, was struck by defendant’s bus and injured. Claimant’s father was appointed guardian ad litem and the claim was settled in 1948 with the approval of the court at Special Term for $1,000. A release was given. This action is brought by plaintiff for *203damages for the injury sustained in the 1944 accident. The complaint makes no reference to the prior settlement and asks no relief in respect of the release. The answer pleads the release as an affirmative defense. No reply has been interposed, and although the effect of this is either *‘ ‘*traverse or avoidance ’ ’ by plaintiff (Civ. Prac. Act, § 243), the parties upon defendant’s motion for summary judgment have treated the pleadings as though plaintiff had alleged a mutual mistake of fact and sought rescission of the release.

The papers of plaintiff in opposition to the motion for summary judgment do not show a mutual mistake of fact in the execution of the release. The physician’s affidavit submitted in the 1948 application to the court for approval of settlement stated that *‘ ‘*there are scars extending around the leg from two inches in width to one-half inch in region of knee joint ’ ’. Plaintiff’s present affidavit states: *“*That due to the fact that the scar has subsequent to the accident grown to a large proportion your deponent suffers from the effects of having the scar area of the knee joint continually open up and become ulcerated, from which it bleeds and excretes purulent matter. That in addition thereto your deponent sustains pains throughout the lower right extremity and particularly in the area of the knee joint during inclement weather.”

There is a difference between a *‘ ‘*failure to appreciate the consequences ” of an injury which is regarded as *“*the sequellae of a known injury and a *“*mistake of fact as to the existence of an injury ’ ’. In the former circumstance ‘ ‘ the release may not be set aside ” *(Gallo*v. *Montenigro,*17 A D 2d 935). Plaintiff shows only that he or his guardian acting for him mistook the future consequence or effect of the injury. It is clear from the affidavit of the physician in 1948 that the injury itself was known to both parties. No triable issue is shown and the release is a complete defense. *(Mack*v. *Albee Press,*263 App. Div. 275, affd. 288 N. Y. 623; *Miles*v. *New York Cent. R. R. Co.,*195 App. Div. 748, appeal dismissed 233 N. Y. 644; *Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.*v. *Wilcox,*116 F. 913.)

The order should be reversed and defendant’s motion for summary judgment granted, with $10 costs.

Coon, Gibson, Heblihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, on the law, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment granted, with $10 costs.
#### WILSON et al. v. PLATT.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

June 22, 1903.)

1. Carriers—Freight—Limitation of Liability.

Where a package given an express company was lost by it, and. no explanation given, and the receipt issued by the carrier stipulated that the carrier should not be liable for damages unless the result of gross negligence or fraud, and that the shipper should not demand more than $50, unless otherwise expressed in the receipt, and the shipper made no statement of value, and none was expressed in the receipt, the shipper could recover no more than $50, though the actual value of the package was greater.

¶ 1. See Carriers, vol. 9, Cent. Dig. § 665.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Eirst District.

Action by Peter R. Wilson and others against Thomas C. Platt, as president of the United States Express Company. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, both parties appeal. Appeals dismissed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and GILDERSLEEVE and MacLEAN, JJ.

*144Wilder & Anderson, for plaintiffs.

Boardman, Platt & Soley, for defendant.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs delivered a package to the United States Express Company for transportation to Chicago. "The package was lost, and no explanation given for such loss. The plaintiffs were awarded judgment, but their recovery was limited to $50, by reason of certain stipulations in the receipt furnished by defendant company. The plaintiffs appeal on the ground that they should have recovered $101.33, which was conceded at the trial to be the real value of the package. The defendant appeals, for the reason that, under another stipulation in the receipt, the defendant was entitled to judgment. The facts in this case come within the doctrine laid down in Bernstein v. Weir (decided at the April Appellate Term, and not yet officially reported) 83 N. Y. Supp. 48. The court below has written an opinion in which good and sufficient reasons are given in support of the decision. Both appeals should be dismissed, and the judgment affirmed, without costs to either party as against the other.

Judgment affirmed, without costs. All concur. *
§ 556.102 Authority. ( a ) The Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA) (43 U.S.C. 1334) authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to issue, on a competitive basis, leases for oil and gas, and sulfur, in submerged lands of the OCS. The Act authorizes the Secretary to grant rights-of-way and easements through the submerged lands of the OCS.
( b ) The Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act of 1982 (FOGRMA) (30 U.S.C. 1711) governs oil and gas royalty management and requires the development of enforcement practices to ensure the prompt and proper collection of oil and gas revenues owed to the U.S.
( c ) The Independent Offices Appropriations Act of 1952 (IOAA) (31 U.S.C. 9701) authorizes fees and charges for Federal government services.
( d ) The Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 (42 U.S.C. 6213) prohibits joint bidding by major oil and gas producers.
( e ) The Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006 (GOMESA) (Pub. L. 109-432, 43 U.S.C. 1331 note): ( 1 ) Shares leasing revenues with Gulf producing states and the Land & Water Conservation Fund for coastal restoration projects; and
( 2 ) Allows companies to exchange certain existing leases in moratorium areas for bonus and royalty credits to be used on other Gulf of Mexico leases.
# VERIFICATION CERTIFICATE

NOT TRANSFERABLE

This Verification Certificate is hereby issued to the named GRANTEE and is VALID ONLY for the equipment identified hereon for use under t he rules and regulations listed below:

GRANTEE: AirSep Corporation Address: 401 Creekside Drive, Buffalo, New York USA, 14228 Contact Person: Mr. Mike Chimiak Phone #: 716-691-0202 x243 Fax #: 716-564-3736 Email Address: mike. chimiak@airsep.com

Equipment Type: Medical Electrical/Electronic Equipment

Product: Focus Unit

, (Model: AS078, P/N: AS078-1-2-3-4) with
a. Battery Pack (14.8Vdc Li-Ion) (Model: BTO23-1; S/N: G3000230: P/N:BT023-1)
b. AirBelt Battery (Ultralife 14.6Vdc Li-Ion) (Model: BT017-X; S/N: F5116013; P/N:BT017-1-2-3-4)
c. AirBelt Battery (International Co mponents Corporation 14.8Vdc Li-Ion) (Model: BT017-X; P/N:BT017-1-2-3-4)
d. Elpac Power Systems AC/DC Power Supply (Model: 4249; P/N:PW019-1)

The above product was tested by UltraTech Engineering Labs Inc. and found to comply with:  CISPR 11:2009 + A1:2010 / EN 55011:2009, Class B, Group 1

 IEC 61000-3-2 / EN61000-3-2: Harmonic Current Emissions

 IEC 61000-3-3 / EN61000-3-3: Voltage Fluctuation and Flicker in LowVoltage Supplies

 EN 60601-1-2 (July 2007) - Medical Electrical Equipment, Part 1-2: General Requirements for Safety - Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic Compatibility - Requirements and Tests. (IEC 60601- 1-2:2007, modified) Note(s) : See attached report, UltraTech's File No.: AIR-100_EN60601-1-2, dated March 7, 2011 for details and conditions of Verification Compliance.

Approved by: Tri M. Luu BASc. V.P. – Engineering 

# UltraTech

3000 Bristol Circle, Oakville, Ontario, Canada, L6H 6G4 Tel.: (905) 829-1570 Fax.: (905) 829-8050 Website: www.ultratech-labs.com Email: vic@ultratech-labs.com , Email: tri@ultratech-labs.com 

# FCC

Korea KCC-RRL

91038 1309 46390-2049 NvLap Lab Code 200093-0 SL2-IN-E-1119R CA2049
§ 585.428 What effect does applying for a renewal have on my activities and payments? If you timely request a renewal: ( a ) You may continue to conduct activities approved under your lease or grant under the original terms and conditions for as long as your request is pending decision by BOEM.
( b ) You may request a suspension of your lease or grant, as provided in § 585.416, while we consider your request.
( c ) For the period BOEM considers your request for renewal, you must continue to make all payments in accordance with the original terms and conditions of your lease or grant.
#### § 56.19056 Availability of hoist operator for automatic hoists.

When automatic hoisting is used, a competent operator of the hoist shall be readily available at or near the hoisting device while any person is underground.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Panavision Inc.
     (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
     Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
     Bobby G. Jenkins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
     pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
     the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:


              (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


              (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.



         /S/ BOBBY G. JENKINS
     -------------------------------
     Bobby G. Jenkins
     Chief Financial Officer
     November 14, 2003