alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FORM N-SAR CERTIFICATION

 

I, Robert E. Killen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-SAR of The Berwyn Funds;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial information included in this report, and the financial statements on which the financial information is based, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rule 30a-2(c) under the Investment Company Act) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and 

c) presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 

 

Date: March 3, 2002					Robert E. Killen 

							President
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 16, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 81552]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27688]



[[Page 81552]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Public Notice for Waiver for Aeronautical Land-Use Assurance at 
El Paso International Airport, El Paso, Texas

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent for waiver of aeronautical land-use.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration is considering a proposal 
to change a portion of the airport from aeronautical to nonaeronautical 
use and to authorize the conversion of the airport property. The 
proposal consists of one parcel of land containing a total of 
approximately 1,179.25 acres. Ownership of the associated property 
transferred land from the United States of America To the city of El 
Paso under the Surplus Property Act of 1944 on July 8, 1969. The land 
comprising this parcel is outside the forecasted need for aviation 
development and, thus, is no longer needed for indirect or direct 
aeronautical use. The income from the conversion of this parcel will 
benefit the aviation community by reinvestment into the airport.
    Approval does not constitute a commitment by the FAA to financially 
assist in the conversion of the subject airport property nor a 
determination of eligibility for grant-in-aid funding from the FAA. The 
disposition of proceeds from the conversion of the airport property 
will be in accordance with FAA's policy and Procedures Concerning the 
Use of Airport Revenue, published in the Federal Register on February 
16, 1999. In accordance with Section 47107(h) of Title 49, United 
States Code, this notice is required in the Federal Register 30 days 
before modifying the land-use assurance that requires the property to 
be used for an aeronautical purpose.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 11, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this document to Mr. Jesse Carriger, 
Federal Aviation Administration, Manager, Texas Airports Development 
office, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Sam Rodriquez, Director of 
Aviation El Paso International Airport, 6701 Convair Road, El Paso, 
Texas 79925, Ms. Sarah Conner Program Manager, Federal Aviation 
Administration, Texas Airports Development Office, ASW-650, 10101 
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, Texas 76177, telephone (817) 222-5682. 
Documents reflecting this FAA action may be reviewed at the above 
locations.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on December 11, 2020.
Ignacio Flores,
Manager, Airports Division, FAA, Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 2020-27688 Filed 12-15-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
#### § 57.12042 Track bonding.

Both rails shall be bonded or welded at every joint and rails shall be crossbonded at least every 200 feet if the track serves as the return trolley circuit. When rails are moved, replaced, or broken bonds are discovered, they shall be rebonded within three working shifts.
#### Reginald A. Batty, as Guardian ad Litem of Gary Batty, an Infant, Respondent, v. John A. Caraco, Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to either party, and verdict of the jirny reinstated. Memorandum: The infant plaintiff when six years old was struck in a public street by an automobile operated by defendant. The proof upon the trial presented a question of fact that was resolved by the jury in favor of the defendant. A motion was made by plaintiff to set aside the verdict. This was granted in a formal order which recited that the action was taken on the ground that the verdict was *“*contrary to the weight of the evidence and contrary to law ”. The Trial Judge wrote nothing stating his reasons for such action. Indeed, the colloquy between court and counsel when the motion was made indicated that the court inclined to the view that the unanimous verdict should not be disturbed. “ If there is conflicting evidence, it is not enough that the court deems the conclusion reached by the jury to be erroneous, or that the court would have come to a different conclusion; for the judgment of the trial court is not to be substituted for that of the jury upon a plain question of fact.” (7 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, § 23, pp. 123’-124.) In our opinion the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. (Appeal by defendant from order of Oneida County Court setting aside the jury verdict of no cause of action and granting a new trial in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and McClusky, JJ. 8 Mary S. as Executrix of Clyde A.
Hon. J. M. Fly County Attorney Victoria County Victoria, Texas

Dear Sir: May 28, ,1953 OpinionNo. S-46 Re: Authority of the Commissioners'Court to spend county funds to hard- 'surfacea piece of land owned by the city of Victoria adjacent to the county courthouse to provide parking space for city and county officials. You have asked substantiallythe following question: Can the C~ommissioners' Court of, Victoria County spend county funds to hardsurface a l/2 block of land owned and controlledby the city of Victoria adjacent to the county courthouseto provide parking space for c~ity,and county officials? Section 51 of Article III of the Constitution of Texas states in part:

"TheLegislature shall have no power to make any grant or authorize the making of any grant of publicmoneys to any individual, associationof individuals,munioipal or other c,orporations whatsoever.

. .n Section 52 of Article III of the Constitution of Texas provides in part:

"TheLegislature shallhave no power to authorize any county, city, town or other political corporationor subdivisionof the State to lend its credit or to grant publicHon. J.M. Fly, page 2 (s-46)

money or thing of value in aid of, or to any individual,associationor corporationwhatsoever. . .' If county Fundswere spent to provideparking space for city and county officials on a city owned and controlled lot, itwould be a grant of public money to a municipal corporation,which is prohibitedby the above quoted Sections of the Constitution.

Therefore,we are of the opinion that Victoria County is prohibited from spending county funds on city owned and controlledproperty for a parking area.

We are enclosing a copy of Attorney General's OpinionV-282 (1947) inwhich it was held permissible for Dawson County to use certain areas on the courthouse yard (ownedby the county) for parking purposes and that the county could pay For the cost of paving the same. SUMMARY Victoria County's CommissionersCourt cannot spend countymoney on city owned and controlledproperty i&provide parking space for city and county officials. Tex.Const. Art. III, Sec,s.

51 and 52. Yours very truly, APPROVED: J. C. Davis, Jr. County Affairs Division C. K. Richards Reviewer Robert S. 'ProWi First Assistant JOHNBRNSREPPERD Attorney General

BY Q&-w e,@+ Sam C. Ratliff

Asslstant

JohnBen Shepperd Attorney General SCR:am
#### § 254.65 Purpose.

This subpart describes the additional requirements for preparing OSRPs and maintaining oil spill preparedness for facilities conducting exploratory drilling operations from a mobile offshore drilling unit (MODU) on the Arctic OCS.
### §3105. Summary of intelligence relating to terrorist recidivism of detainees held at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba

#### (a) In general

The Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency and the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, shall make publicly available an unclassified summary of—

(1) intelligence relating to recidivism of detainees currently or formerly held at the Naval Detention Facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, by the Department of Defense; and

(2) an assessment of the likelihood that such detainees will engage in terrorism or communicate with persons in terrorist organizations.

#### (b) Updates

Not less frequently than annually, the Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency and the Secretary of Defense, shall update and make publicly available an unclassified summary consisting of the information required by subsection (a) and the number of individuals formerly detained at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, who are confirmed or suspected of returning to terrorist activities after release or transfer from such Naval Station.

(July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title V, §506I, as added Pub. L. 112–87, title III, §307(a)(1), Jan. 3, 2012, 125 Stat. 1882; amended Pub. L. 116–92, div. E, title LVII, §5701(a)(1), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2159.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 415a–11 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

2019—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 116–92 substituted "annually" for "once every 6 months".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Initial Update

Pub. L. 112–87, title III, §307(a)(2), Jan. 3, 2012, 125 Stat. 1883, provided that: "The initial update required by section 506I(b) of such Act [act July 26, 1947, ch. 343; 50 U.S.C. 3105(b)], as added by paragraph (1) of this subsection, shall be made publicly available not later than 10 days after the date the first report following the date of the enactment of the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 [Jan. 3, 2012] is submitted to members and committees of Congress pursuant to section 319 of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111–32; 10 U.S.C. 801 note)."
#### § 57.7053 Moving hand-held drills.

Before hand-held drills are moved from one working area to another, air shall be turned off and bled from the hose.
```

[Federal Register: June 10, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 111)]
[Notices]               
[Page 32980]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr10jn10-80]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7043]

 
Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Ringo Starr's Snare Drum''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the object to be 
included in the exhibit ``Ringo Starr's Snare Drum,'' imported from 
abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, is of 
cultural significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan 
agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at the Metropolitan 
Museum of Art, New York, NY, from on or about July 1, 2010, until on or 
about December 31, 2010, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice 
of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
description of the exhibit object, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/632-6473). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
5, L/PD, Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: June 2, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-13965 Filed 6-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,389
<SECURITIES>                                     1,924
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,859
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,711
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               462,176
<PP&E>                                       1,759,961
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,326,627
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 968,659
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          439,559
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       206,713
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,753
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   968,659
<SALES>                                         67,580
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,616
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,271
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,083
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,345
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,345
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,345
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
§ 550.166 If BOEM grants me a RUE, what financial assurance must I provide? ( a ) Before BOEM grants you a RUE on the OCS, you must submit or maintain financial assurance of $500,000, which will guarantee compliance with the regulations and the terms and conditions of all RUEs you hold. ( 1 ) You are not required to submit and maintain the financial assurance of $500,000 pursuant to this paragraph (a) if you furnish and maintain area-wide lease financial assurance in excess of $500,000 pursuant to § 556.901(a) of this subchapter, provided that the area-wide lease financial assurance also guarantees compliance with all the terms and conditions of all RUEs you hold in the area.
( 2 ) The Regional Director may reduce the amount required in this paragraph (a) upon a determination that the reduced amount is sufficient to guarantee compliance with the regulations and the terms and conditions of all RUE grant(s) you hold.
( 3 ) The requirements for financial assurance in §§ 556.900(d) through (g) 556.902 of this subchapter apply to the financial assurance required under paragraph (a) of this section.
( b ) If BOEM grants you a RUE that serves either an OCS lease or a State lease, the Regional Director may require supplemental financial assurance above the amount required by paragraph (a) of this section, to ensure compliance with the obligations under your RUE grant, based on an evaluation of your ability to carry out present and future obligations on the RUE using the criteria set forth in § 556.901(d)(1) through (3) of this subchapter. This supplemental financial assurance must: ( 1 ) Meet the requirements of §§ 556.900(d) through (g) and 556.902 of this subchapter; and
( 2 ) Cover costs and liabilities for compliance with the obligations of your RUE grants and with applicable BOEM and Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) orders.
( c ) If you fail to replace any deficient financial assurance upon demand or fail to provide supplemental financial assurance upon demand, the Regional Director may: ( 1 ) Assess penalties under subpart N of this part;
( 2 ) Request BSEE to suspend operations on your RUE; and/or
( 3 ) Initiate action for cancellation of your RUE grant.
[89 FR 31589, Apr. 24, 2024]
#### Harry Boser et al., Respondents, v C. Raymond Burdick et al., Doing Business as Burdick Trailer Sales & Service, et al., Defendants, and Wedgewood Holly Corporation, Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed as to defendant Wedgewood. Memorandum: Defendant Wedgewood Holly Corp. appeals from denial of its motion for summary judgment to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint for lack of jurisdiction. Defendant claims that service of process upon it was never effected and that plaintiffs therefore did not obtain jurisdiction. We agree. In order to obtain personal jurisdiction over a corporation, process must be delivered to "an officer, director, managing or general agent, or cashier or assistant cashier or to any other agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service” (CPLR 311, subd 1). The record indicates that plaintiffs’ process server, an attorney, served the summons and complaint on a person who advised him that he was employed by "Frigiking,” a corporation distinct from defendant, which had purchased some of defendant’s assets and equipment. He clearly had no relationship with the defendant corporation. Under those circumstances the process server did not act reasonably or with due diligence to effect service and plaintiffs therefore did not obtain jurisdiction *(McDonald v Ames Supply Co.,*22 NY2d 111; *Jacobs v Zurich Ins. Co.,*53 AD2d 524 app dsmd 40 NY2d 844). Plaintiffs’ argument that defendant should be estopped from asserting improper service is without merit. Nothing in the record supports plaintiffs’ contention that Wedgewood Holly or any agent or employee thereof represented to plaintiffs’ process server that it was still doing business at its old address. Although defendant was still listed in the telephone directory at that address and its signs were still on the premises, the process server was clearly informed that Wedgewood Holly was no longer at that address. The burden of proving jurisdiction is on the party asserting it *(Jacobs v Zurich Ins. Co., supra; Saratoga Harness Racing Assn. v Moss,*26 AD2d 486, 490 affd 20 NY2d 733), and the hearsay allegations here do not rise to the requisite level of proof *(Ziperman v Frontier Hotel of Las Vegas,*50 AD2d 581, 582). (Appeal from order of Cattaraugus Supreme Court—summary judgment.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Dillon, Hancock, Jr., Denman and Witmer, JJ.
§ 553.10 What facilities does this part cover? ( a ) This part applies to any COF on any lease or permit issued or on any RUE granted under the OCSLA or applicable State law.
( b ) For a pipeline COF that extends onto land, this part applies to that portion of the pipeline lying seaward of the first accessible flow shut-off device on land.
### SUBCHAPTER III—SECURITY CLEARANCES AND CLASSIFIED INFORMATION
### Part C—Hanford Reservation, Washington

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 113–66, div. C, title XXXI, §3146(e)(16)(C), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 1078, redesignated part D as C.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior part C, consisting of section 2611, related to privatization, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 113–66, div. C, title XXXI, §3146(e)(12), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 1078.
| (1)   | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                 |   |                                      |   |
|----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: August 8, 2011 | By:    | /s/Ron Tremblay                           |   |
|                 |   | Ron Tremblay, Principal Executive Officer |   |