T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T VI CT OR HU GO M ARTI NEZJ AR AMI L L O, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 11- 70751 A ge nc yN o. A 030- 700- 636 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r d o f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r19, 2012 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. V i c t orH ugo M art i ne z - J a r a m i l l o, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of E c ua dor , pe t i t i ons pr o s e f orr e vi e w of

the B oa r d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rdi s m i s s i ng h is ap p e a l f

r o m a n im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s r e m o v a l o r d e r . O u rju r is d ic tio n is

# FI LED DE C 21 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 70751 2 g o v e rn e db y8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o q u e s tio n s o f la w . Moh am m ed v. G on zales , 4 0 0 F .3 d 7 8 5 , 7 9 1 - 9 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . W e d e n yin p a rt a n dd is m is s in p a rt th e p e titio n f

o rr e v ie w . In hi s openi ng bri ef

, M art i nez- Jaram i l l o fai l s t o add re ss , and there fore has w a iv e da n yc h a lle n g e to , th e B I A ’s d e te rm in a tio n th a t h e is s ta tu to r ilyin e lig ib le f orc a nc e l l a t i on of

r e m ova l unde r8 U . S . C . § 1229b( c ) ( 6) , a nd f ora dj us tm e ntof s ta tu s u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 5 ( a ) ( 3 ) . Se e M a r t i n ez - Se rr a n o v . I

NS , 94 F . 3d 1256, 1259- 60 ( 9th C i r . 1996) ( i s s ue s w hi c h a r e nots pe c i f i c a l l yr a i s e d a nd a r gue d i n a party’ s openi ng bri ef

ar e w ai ved). W e ne e d notc ons i de rM a rt i ne z - J a r a m i l l o’ s c l a i m tha thi s c onvi c t i ons f or bu rgl ary and petty theftar e notcr i m es i nv ol vi ng m oral turpi tud e bec ause he fa i l ed to r a is e th is is s u e b e f

o r e th is c o u rt in h is p r io rp e titio n f o rr e v ie w . Se e Chr is t i an L eg a l So c . Ch a

p te ro f Un i v e rs i t

yo f Ca l i f o rn i a v . Wu , 62 6 F . 3d 48 3, 48 8 (9th C i r. 2010) ( pe t i t i one rw ho f a i l s t o r a i s e a n i s s ue i n pr e vi ous pe t i t i on f orr e vi e w i s not e n title dto “as e c o n d b ite a t th e ap p e lla te ap p le ” ) . M a rt i ne z - J a m a r i l l o’ s c ont e nt i on tha tthe a ge nc yvi ol a t e d due pr oc e s s by f a ilin g to c o n s id e rh is p r o o f o f r e h ab ilita tio n is r e

je c te d .11- 70751 3 W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew the agency’ s det erm i nat i on thatM art i nezJ a m a r illo d idn o t m e r it v o lu n ta ryd e p a rtu r e a s am a tte ro f d is c r e tio n . See 8 U . S. C. § 1 22 9c(f

) ( “ N o cou rtshal l have j uri sdi ct i on ov eran appeal fr om deni al of a r e q u e s t f o ra n o r d e ro f

v o lu n ta ryd e p a rtu r e ” ) . P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.