alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

RECEIVED 

JAN 1 3 2017 

HEARING DOCKET 

In the Matter of: 

William A. Curtright 

Docket No. FAA-2015-1319 

FAA Case No. 2014NM090046 

Judge J. E. Sullivan 

COMPLAINANT'S REQUEST TO CHANGE THE TIME OF THE NEXT SCHEDULED 

PREHEARINGCONFERENCECALL 

Comes now undersigned counsel for Complainant and hereby moves to reschedule the 

Prehearing Phone Conference currently scheduled for January 25, 2017 at 10:30 AM PST. The 

reasons are as follows: 

1. I have a sister who recently became severely disabled and is in the process of 

transitioning into an assisted care facility in Orange County, California. 

2. My presence in Orange County is required the first part of the week of January 23, 

2017, for various issues related to her care. 

3. I was not aware of my need to be engaged as described above during the previous 

telephonic conference. 

4. I booked a non-refundable flight that is scheduled to depart on January 25, 2017, 

at 8:35AM and arrive in Seattle at 11:21 AM (2:21PM EST). 

5. Assuming no airline schedule disruptions or other mishap I should be available to 

participate in a conference anytime after 12:00 PM PST (3:00PM EST). 
Consequently, I respectfully request that the conference be delay for at least an hour and a 

half. If that is not possible, then I request it be rescheduled. It can be moved up to earlier date if 

that is more convenient. 

Respectfully submitted this 9th day of January 2017. 

I 

MVID F. SHAYNE 

FAA Attorney 

DAVID F. SHAYNE, FAA ATTORNEY 

TEL: (425) 227-2165; FAX: (425) 227-1007 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certifY that the foregoing Complainant's Request to Change the Time of the Next 

Scheduled Prehearing Conference Call has been served as designated by the recipient this date, to 

the following: 

Judge J.E. Sullivan (Facsimile and Certified Mail-RRR) 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Fax: (202) 366-7536 

Federal Aviation Administration (Facsimile and Certified Mail-RRR) 

800 Independence Avenue SW 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1 000 

Fax: (202) 267-1293 

William A. Curtright (Facsimile, email, Certified Mail-RRR) 

P.O. Box 1350 

Jefferson, OR 97352 

Fax: (503) 485-0812 

Email: ames@amesresearch.com 

Dated this 9th day of January 2017. 

DAVID F. SHAYNE, F AAATTORNEY 

TEL: (425) 227·2165; FAX: (425) 227-1007
§ 285.615 What other reports or notices must I submit to BSEE under my approved SAP? ( a ) You must notify BSEE in writing within 30 days of completing installation activities approved in your SAP.
( b ) You must submit a certification of compliance annually (or other frequency as determined by BOEM) with those terms and conditions of your SAP that BOEM identifies under 30 CFR 585.613(e)(1). Together with your certification, you must submit: ( 1 ) Summary reports that show compliance with the terms and conditions which require certification; and
( 2 ) A statement identifying and describing any mitigation measures and monitoring methods and their effectiveness. If you identified measures that were not effective, you must include your recommendations for new mitigation measures or monitoring methods.
#### Viking Yacht Rental Corporation, Appellant, v. American Yachting Systems, Inc., Respondent.

Order entered on January 11, 1961, denying plaintiff’s motion to disaffirm the Referee’s recommendation as to the amount of the fine and granting defendant’s cross motion to confirm, unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, to the extent of striking therefrom the fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth decretal paragraphs and the matter is remanded for further testimony with respect to whether damage was sustained by the plaintiff as a result of the defendant’s noneomplianee with the injunctive order of the court dated June 21, 1960, and if so the amount thereof. The purpose of the reference was to *905determine the amount of the damage sustained by reason of the defendant’s disregard of the injunctive order. While the record demonstrated damage to the boat and there was competent proof as to the amount thereof, there was no proof as to when such damage was sustained. It was thus impossible to determine whether the damage was sustained subsequent to the effective date of the order or whether it pre-existed the same. The Referee recommended that a further hearing be held to establish the facts in connection therewith. In the alternative he recommended that the defendant be fined the sum of $259 together with the costs of the proceeding. Special Term accepted the alternative recommendation. The evidence points to a clear contempt on the part of the defendant. He deliberately disregarded the order of the court. In the circumstances of this case the plaintiff should be given an opportunity to establish, if he can, that the damage to the boat occurred subsequent to the effective date of the injunction and that it was the result of the refusal of defendant to comply with the terms thereof. Accordingly, the matter is remanded for further proof. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Bastow, JJ.
#### § 57.19106 Shaft sets.

Shaft sets shall be kept in good repair and clean of hazardous material.
Exhibit 31.3





Certifications





I, Howard A. Willard III, certify that:





|   |                                                                                              
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Altria Group, Inc.;




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.







Date:  May 31, 2018





/s/ HOWARD A. WILLARD IIIHoward A. Willard IIIChairman and Chief Executive Officer
### SUBCHAPTER II—STANDARDS AND COMPLIANCE
§ 57.22605 Blasting from the surface (V-A mines). ( a ) All development and production blasting shall be initiated from the surface after all persons are out of the mine. Persons shall not enter the mine until ventilating air has passed over the blast area and through at least one atmospheric monitoring sensor.
( b ) If the monitoring system indicates that methane in the mine is less than 1.0 percent, persons may enter the mine, and all places blasted shall be tested for methane by a competent person before work is started.
( c ) If the monitoring system indicates the presence of 1.0 percent or more methane, persons other than examiners shall not enter the mine until the mine has been examined by a competent person and the methane level is less than 1.0 percent.
( d ) Vehicles used for transportation when examining the mine shall be approved by MSHA under the applicable requirements of 30 CFR parts 18 through 36.
( e ) This standard applies only to mines blasting within an oil reservoir.
Exhibit 10.1


 


Acri Capital Acquisition Corporation


13284 Pond Springs Rd, Ste 405


Austin, Texas 78729


 


November 18, 2022


Whereas, the undersigned parties (the “Parties”)
entered into a Letter Agreement (the “Existing Agreement”) dated June 9, 2022, in connection with the initial public offering
of Acri Capital Acquisition Corporation (the “Company”).


Whereas, pursuant to Section 13 of the Existing
Agreement the Parties deem it necessary to amend the Existing Agreement to correct certain terms of the Existing Agreement.


Therefore, it is hereby agreed between the Parties
that:


1. Section 8(a) of the Existing Agreement is
hereby amended to read as follow:


”(a)
Each Initial Stockholder agrees that it, he or she shall not Transfer its Founder Shares until the earlier to occur of: (A) six months
after the completion of the Company’s initial Business Combination, (B) the date on which the Company completes a liquidation, merger,
stock exchange or other similar transaction after the initial business combination that results in all of its public stockholders having
the right to exchange their shares of common stock for cash, securities or other property, or (C) the date on which the last reported
sale price of the Company’s Class A Common Stock equals or exceeds $12.00 per share (as adjusted for share splits, share dividends,
reorganizations and recapitalizations) for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period commencing after the completion of the
Company’s initial Business Combination, or earlier, in any case, if subsequent to the Company’s initial Business Combination,
the Company completes a subsequent liquidation, merger, stock exchange or other similar transaction that results in all of the Company’s
stockholders having the right to exchange their shares for cash, securities or other property (the “Founder Shares Lock-up Period”).”


2. The remaining sections of the Existing Agreement
shall be the same and shall remain binding and effective.





[Signature Pages Follow]






    


     


    




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have duly
executed this agreement as of the date first written above.





	Acri Capital Acquisition Corporation	Acri Capital Sponsor LLC
	
     

    By: /s/ “Joy” Yi Hua                          

    Name: “Joy” Yi Hua

    Title: CEO and Chairwoman
	
     

    By: /s/ “Joy” Yi Hua                             

    Name: “Joy” Yi Hua

    Title: Manager

	 	 
	
    “Joy” Yi Hua 

    (CEO and Chairwoman)
	
    James “Jim” C. Hardin Jr. 

    (Independent Director)

	
     

    /s/ “Joy” Yi Hua                               
	
     

    By: /s/ James “Jim” C. Hardin, Jr.       

	 	 
	
    Edmund Miller

    (Independent Director)
	
    Andrew Pierce

    (Independent Director)

	
     

    /s/ Edmund Miller                             
	
     

    /s/ Andrew Pierce
Exhibit 10.55


                                  RENT A WRECK

March 7, 2002


Mr. Ted Demetriou
Demetriou Insurance Services
1250 Marywood Drive
Belair, MD  21014

Sent via Federal Express #8257 6979 55111

Re: Letter of Agreement

Dear Ted:

The following letter of agreement between  Rent-A-Wreck of America,  Inc. (RAWA)
and Demetriou Insurance Services (DIS) is to be effective as of March 1, 2002. A
self-addressed  and stamped  envelope is enclosed for your  convenience.  Please
sign and return for our records.

     *    Demetrio Insurance Services will manage the captive, Consolidated
          American Rental Insurance Company, LTD, regarding processing of
          renewals, adding new accounts, issuing COI's and ID cards, monitoring
          claims experience, and acting as underwriter and actuary.

     *    DIS will attend meetings, seminars, conventions and classes, at the
          direction and discretion of RAWA.

     *    DIS will submit applications to other markets that may come available
          for non-captive states, pertaining to all non-physical damage
          coverages. If possible and with expected profitability, physical
          damage will be offered through the captive.

     *    DIS will continue to solicit markets for excess coverage with the
          intent of brining this under the new joint venture as well.

     *    First year compensation to DIS will be $6,000 per month, payable
          monthly, with annual adjustments based on growth. At no time will the
          monthly fee be less than $6,000.

     *    Ongoing expenses will be borne by mutual agreement, some by DIS, some
          by RAWA and some by the new joint venture.

     *    RAWA will pay for Ted Demetriou and the new joint venture to become
          licensed in all states as soon as possible.

     *    This agreement will have a minimum term of three years.
<PAGE>
     *    All commissions generated from all other sources will be split 75% to
          RAWA and 25% to DIS, subject to an annual review.

     *    It's agreed that all business generated from the car rental
          marketplace will be placed through this joint venture.

     *    DIS agrees not to compete with the captive, and not to solicit
          business from customers within this program after the expiration and
          termination of this agreement.

     *    All disputes arising out of this agreement will be resolved by
          arbitration before the American Arbitration Association. Arbitration
          Hearings will be held in Baltimore, Maryland.

Sincerely,

Kenneth L. Blum, Jr.
President

KLB/rld

cc: Mitra Ghahramanlou

AGREED TO: /s/ Ted Demetriou                         3/8/02
           ------------------------------          --------
           Ted Demetriou

AGREED TO: /s/ Kenneth L. Blum, Jr.                 3/18/02
           ------------------------------          --------
           Kenneth L. Blum, Jr.
           President, RAWA
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Discovery Oil, Ltd, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew V. Ippolito, President and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Andrew V. Ippolito

By  __________________________________

Andrew V. Ippolito

President, Chairman of the Board

Date:  November 19, 2010









A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Discovery Oil, Ltd. and will be retained by the Company to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 56.19072 Skips and cages in same compartment.

When combinations of cages and skips are used in the same compartment, the cages shall be enclosed to protect personnel from flying material and the hoist speed reduced to man-speed as defined in standard 56.19061, but not to exceed 1,000 feet per minute. Muck shall not be hoisted with personnel during shift changes.
#### Perlman & Wortmann, Inc., Appellant-Respondent, v. Yonkers Contracting Company, Inc., et al., Respondents-Appellants.

Order, entered July 27, 1960 dismissing complaint for legal insufficiency, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to plaintiff-appellant-respondent, and the motion for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice denied, with $10 costs, with leave, however, to defendants, if they are so advised, to renew their motion at the conclusion of all pretrial procedures. On a motion for summary judgment under rule 113 the complaint was not properly dismissed for insufficiency in the pleading (Tripp, A Guide to Motion Practice [Rev. ed.], p. 283, § 95; subd. 17). Viewing the record under rule 113, there are issues of fact. The affidavits are in conflict as to the nature of the omissions from plaintiff’s bid as presented, and the responsibility for such omissions. On the basic merits of plaintiff’s legal theory, there are circumstances in which intentional interference with economic expectancies may engender a *600cause of action (see Harper and James, Law of Torts, § 6.11). Thus, the fact that defendant had no obligation to solicit bids from those situated like plaintiff is not determinative. The fact is that defendant did solicit bids, and plaintiff may have thereby incurred a proteetible economic interest, especially since the bids required the approval of a third party. Nor may one say on this record that the motive attributed by plaintiff to defendant, namely to favor another, was or was not a legally sufficient excuse or justification for the alleged falsification of plaintiff’s bid *(ibid.*§ 6.12). Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         450,906
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,527
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               692,923
<PP&E>                                      22,285,040
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,325,543
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,871,592
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          427,849
<BONDS>                                     13,025,497
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,418,246<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,871,592
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,176,473
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,252,044
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,114,678
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (190,249)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (190,249)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (190,249)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (4.92)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>This entity is a limited partnership.  The Other Stockholders Equity line
represents total Partnership equity.
<F2>The EPS-Primary line represents net loss per limited partnership unit.
</FN>



</TABLE>
Martin, Michael (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Sir, 

Bruce Gordon < bruce@btpost.net> 

Thursday, April 19, 2012 4:53 PM 

Martin, Michael (OST) 

Robert Woolf; Roger Stidolph; Monte & Rebecca Mitchell; Tom Marshal; Wayne Lonn; 

Mike Forbush; Dave Dusina; Paul & Karen Dillon; Adam & Haley DesRoisers; Neal 

Dastrup; John Crabill; Jack Campbell; Steve Beasley; Tom & Betsy Bear; Bart & Lois 

Adrian 

EAS Mail Contract Renewal for Excursion Inlet, Alaska 99850 

PGP.sig 

As a Resident of Excursion Inlet. Alaska, and knowing that this contract 

is corning up for renewal here in 2012, I would like to remind you of our 

conversation in 2010, and 2011, concerning the "Road that airplanes Land on" 

and the Official AKDOT FloatPlane Sea-Drorne at Excursion Inlet, Alaska. 

As you may recall, We had issues with the present Contract Carrier 

(Wings of Alaska) not having a Floatplane or Arnphib Aircraft in their Fleet, 

to service our community, when the "Road that airplanes Land on" was Closed 

due to the Snow Depth, and our Grader not being Operational. This Road is NOT 

an Airstrip, or FAA designated Landing Zone, but has been used by the Previous 

Contract Carrier (LAB Flying Service) with Wheel Planes, when it was available, 

and Open. LAB had both Wheel, and Float, and well as an aircraft on Snow Skis, 

that could be used to comply with the terms of the EAS Contract. Wings of Alaska 

originally kept a FloatPlane, as part of their fleet, to service our community, 

HOWEVER when the Ownership changed, in 2010 that was no longer the case, which 

precipitated the Issue of the Service interruptions, when the "Road" was CLOSED. 

A Letter of Understanding from your Office, was then issued to clarify the 

situation. It was also suggested that we (The Permanent Residents) write you 

folks a Letter, to make sure that any Renewed Contract has such language in it, 

to cover such a situation arising from such a "Road Closure" situation, that 

may occur in the future. 

This is that Letter, and Request. 

Thank You, for your consideration on this issue. 

Sincerely, 

~.A}~ 

Bruce (semiretired powderman & exFCC Field Inspector for Southeastern Alaska) 

Bruce Gordon* Debora Gordon R.N. 

P.O. Box EXI 

Juneau, Alaska 99850 

AL7AQ * KL7WJ 

Bruce's Trading Post 

Excursion Inlet South 

Excursion Inlet, Alaska 99850 

www. btpost. net www. 99850. net 

1