alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §219. Removal of customhouse and detention of vessels thereat

Whenever, at any port of entry, the duties on imports cannot, in the judgment of the President, be collected in the ordinary way, or by the course provided in section 218 1 of this title, by reason of the cause mentioned in said section, he may direct that the customhouse for the district be established in any secure place within the district, either on land or on board any vessel in the district, or at sea near the coast; and in such case the collector shall reside at such place, or on shipboard, as the case may be, and there detain all vessels and cargoes arriving within or approaching the district, until the duties imposed by law on such vessels and their cargoes are paid in cash. But if the owner or consignee of the cargo on board any vessel thus detained, or the master of the vessel, desires to enter a port of entry in any other district where no such obstructions to the execution of the laws exist, the master may be permitted so to change the destination of the vessel and cargo in his manifest; whereupon the collector shall deliver him a written permit to proceed to the port so designated. And the Secretary of the Treasury, with the approval of the President, shall make proper regulations for the enforcement on shipboard of such provisions of the laws regulating the assessment and collection of duties as in his judgment may be necessary and practicable.

(R.S. §5315.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 218 of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 632.

#### Codification

R.S. §5315 derived from acts July 13, 1861, ch. 3, §2, 12 Stat. 256; Mar. 3, 1875, ch. 136, §2, 18 Stat. 469.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

All offices of collector of customs, comptroller of customs, surveyor of customs, and appraiser of merchandise of the Bureau of Customs of Department of the Treasury to which appointments were required to be made by President with advice and consent of Senate ordered abolished, with such offices to be terminated not later than Dec. 31, 1966, by Reorg. Plan No. 1, of 1965, eff. May 25, 1965, 30 F.R. 7035, 79 Stat. 1317, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees. All functions of offices eliminated were already vested in Secretary of the Treasury by Reorg. Plan No. 26 of 1950, eff. July 31, 1950, 15 F.R. 4935, 64 Stat. 1280, set out in the Appendix to Title 5.

1 See References in Text note below.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of Cardima,  Inc. (the  "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the quarter  ending June 30,  2006 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 14, 2006

/s/ Gabriel B. Vegh
-------------------
Gabriel B. Vegh
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and Acting Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             953
<SECURITIES>                                     1,924
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,816
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,711
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               505,176
<PP&E>                                       1,756,461
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,345,732
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 983,777
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          438,231
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       206,713
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,657
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   983,777
<SALES>                                         35,745
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,589
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,008
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,313
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,732)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,732)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,732)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### §31312. Decertification authority

(a) In General.—If the Secretary of Transportation determines that a State is in substantial noncompliance with this chapter, the Secretary shall issue an order to—

(1) prohibit that State from carrying out licensing procedures under this chapter; and

(2) prohibit that State from issuing any commercial driver's licenses until such time the Secretary determines such State is in substantial compliance with this chapter.

(b) Effect on Other States.—A State (other than a State subject to an order under subsection (a)) may issue a non-resident commercial driver's license to an individual domiciled in a State that is prohibited from such activities under subsection (a) if that individual meets all requirements of this chapter and the nonresident licensing requirements of the issuing State.

(c) Previously Issued Licenses.—Nothing in this section shall be construed as invalidating or otherwise affecting commercial driver's licenses issued by a State before the date of issuance of an order under subsection (a) with respect to the State.

(Added Pub. L. 106–159, title II, §203(a), Dec. 9, 1999, 113 Stat. 1762.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 31312, Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1025, related to grants for testing and ensuring the fitness of operators of commercial motor vehicles, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–178, title IV, §4011(f), June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 408.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136943 & (32)(33)(34)	 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 136943 

 COA: 282255 
 Wayne CC: 02-011058-01

FREDDY KATO-HARRIS LOVE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 2, 2008 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to 

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motions 

to remand are DENIED. 

s1117 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 25, 2008 

 Clerk
#### § 57.19076 Maximum speeds for hoisting persons in buckets.

When persons are hoisted in buckets, speeds shall not exceed 500 feet per minute and shall not exceed 200 feet per minute when within 100 feet of the intended station.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Panavision Inc.
     (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
     Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
     Robert L. Beitcher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
     pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
     the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:


              (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


              (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.



         /S/ ROBERT L. BEITCHER
     ------------------------------------
     Robert L. Beitcher
     President and Chief Executive Officer

     November 14, 2003
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

**Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to**

**Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Ricardo A. Verdaguer, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IMPSATFiber Networks, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

(b) [omitted] 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function): 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

May 15, 2006
§ 203.74 When will BSEE reconsider its determination? You may request a redetermination after we withdraw approval or after you renounce royalty relief, unless we withdraw approval due to your providing false or intentionally inaccurate information. Under certain conditions you may also request a redetermination if we deny your application or if you want your approved royalty suspension volume to change. In these instances, to be eligible for a redetermination, at least one of the following four conditions must occur. ( a ) You have significant new G&G data and you previously have not either requested a redetermination or reapplied for relief after we withdrew approval or you relinquished royalty relief. “Significant” means that the new G&G data: ( 1 ) Results from drilling new wells or getting new three-dimensional seismic data and information (but not reinterpreting old data);
( 2 ) Did not exist at the time of the earlier application; and
( 3 ) Changes your estimates of gross resource size, quality, or projected flow rates enough to materially affect the results of our earlier determination.
( b ) You demonstrate in your new application that the technology that most efficiently develops this field or lease was not considered or deemed feasible in the original application. Your newly proposed technology must improve the profitability, under equivalent market conditions, of the field or lease relative to the development system proposed in the prior application.
( c ) Your current reference price decreases by more than 25 percent from your base reference price as calculated under this paragraph. ( 1 ) Your current reference price is a weighted-average of daily closing prices on the NYMEX for light sweet crude oil and natural gas over the most recent full 12 calendar months;
( 2 ) Your base reference price is a weighted average of daily closing prices on the NYMEX for light sweet crude oil and natural gas for the full 12 calendar months preceding the date of your most recently approved application for this royalty relief; and
( 3 ) The weighting factors are the proportions of the total production volume (in BOE) for oil and gas associated with the most likely scenario (identified in §§ 203.85 and 203.88) from your most recently approved application for this royalty relief.
( d ) Before starting to build your development and production system, you have revised your estimated development costs, and they are more than 120 percent of the eligible development costs associated with the most likely scenario from your most recently approved application for this royalty relief.
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________

No. 07-14-00129-CV 

________________________

SUSAN MCDONALD, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

SAMUEL A. HENDRICKS, APPELLEE 

 

 

On Appeal from the 52nd District Court 

Coryell County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 41621; Honorable Trent D. Farrell, Presiding 

 

June 23, 2014 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J. and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Pending before this Court is a motion to dismiss filed by Appellant, Susan 

McDonald. By this motion Appellant represents she and Appellee, Samuel A. 

Hendricks, have compromised and settled their differences which are the basis of this 

appeal. Without passing on the merits of the appeal, McDonald’s motion is granted and 

the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Pursuant to the motion, all 

costs on appeal should be taxed against the party incurring them. Id. at 42.1(d). 
2

Having dismissed this appeal at McDonald’s request, no motion for rehearing will be 

entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Patrick A. Pirtle

 Justice
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-18-00008-CV

IN RE Maria Cecilia MARTINEZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 31, 2018

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On January 8, 2018, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, and the real parties in 

interest later filed a response. After considering the petition and response, this court is of the 

opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of 

mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. PR-06-004, styled In the Estate of Ignacia G. Gutierrez, pending in the 

County Court at Law, Starr County, Texas, the Honorable Romero Molina presiding.
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.4


                  AMENDMENT TO KEY EXECUTIVE STOCK OPTION PLAN

         Section 1.05 of the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

         The maximum number of shares of Common Stock which may be issued under
the Plan shall be increased by 100,000 shares.

                                        Approved by Shareholders on May 29, 1998





                                       1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1996
<CASH>                                             186
<SECURITIES>                                       620
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,537
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (26)
<INVENTORY>                                        498
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                           1,467
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (783)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,067
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          1,223
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        244
<COMMON>                                         2,132
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,490)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,067
<SALES>                                          1,362
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,432
<CGS>                                            1,199
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,397
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    57
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     2
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  18
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     35
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (13)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 22
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        22
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
<FN>
<F1>The Company has adopted an unclassified presentation in the Statement of
Financial Condition.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1


The following
certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238. These
certifications shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be incorporated by
reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.








Certification
of Chief Executive Officer





Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned officer of Schiff Nutrition International, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge,
that:





(i)  the accompanying
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended February 29,
2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and





(ii)  the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
      April 3, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Bruce J.
      WoodBruce J.
      WoodChief
      Executive Officer





A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Schiff
Nutrition International, Inc. and will be retained by Schiff Nutrition
International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.








Certification
of Chief Financial Officer





Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned officer of Schiff Nutrition International, Inc. a Delaware,
corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge,
that:





(i)  the accompanying
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended February 29,
2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and





(ii)  the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
      April 3, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Joseph W.
      BatyJoseph W.
      BatyChief
      Financial Officer





A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Schiff
Nutrition International, Inc. and will be retained by Schiff Nutrition
International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
### §53408. Regulatory relief

(a) Operation in Foreign Commerce.—A program participant for a vessel included in an operating agreement under this chapter may operate the vessel in the foreign commerce of the United States without restriction.

(b) Other Restrictions.—The restrictions of section 55305(a) of this title concerning the building, rebuilding, or documentation of a vessel in a foreign country shall not apply to a vessel for any day the operator of the vessel is receiving payments for the operation of that vessel under an operating agreement under this chapter.

(c) Telecommunications Equipment.—The telecommunications and other electronic equipment on an existing vessel that is redocumented under the laws of the United States for operation under an operating agreement under this chapter shall be deemed to satisfy all Federal Communications Commission equipment approval requirements, if—

(1) such equipment complies with all applicable international agreements and associated guidelines as determined by the country in which the vessel was documented immediately before becoming documented under the laws of the United States;

(2) that country has not been identified by the Secretary as inadequately enforcing international regulations as to that vessel; and

(3) at the end of its useful life, such equipment shall be replaced with equipment that meets Federal Communications Commission equipment approval standards.

(Added Pub. L. 116–283, div. C, title XXXV, §3511(a), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4417.)