alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          15,466
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 9,990
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     69,235
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        171,532
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,944
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 284,282
<DEPOSITS>                                     252,718
<SHORT-TERM>                                     3,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,446
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,091
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,173
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 284,282
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 14,948
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,114
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   609
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                19,671
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,332
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,405
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           12,266
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      480
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  52
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 11,842
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,061
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,656
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.25
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.07
<LOANS-NON>                                         13
<LOANS-PAST>                                       197
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    186
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,999
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      695
<RECOVERIES>                                       160
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,944
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,944
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,399
        

</TABLE>
### §20163. Certification of train conductors

(a) Regulations.—Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008, the Secretary of Transportation shall prescribe regulations to establish a program requiring the certification of train conductors. In prescribing such regulations, the Secretary shall require that train conductors be trained, in accordance with the training standards developed pursuant to section 20162.

(b) Program Requirements.—In developing the regulations required by subsection (a), the Secretary may consider the requirements of section 20135(b) through (e).

(Added Pub. L. 110–432, div. A, title IV, §402(a), Oct. 16, 2008, 122 Stat. 4884.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of enactment of the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008, referred to in subsec. (a), is the date of enactment of div. A of Pub. L. 110–432, which was approved Oct. 16, 2008.
§ 585.307 How will BOEM determine whether competitive interest exists for ROW grants and RUE grants? To determine whether or not there is competitive interest: ( a ) We will publish a public notice, generally describing the parameters of the project, to give affected and interested parties an opportunity to comment on the proposed ROW grant or RUE grant area.
( b ) We will evaluate any comments received on the notice and make a determination of the level of competitive interest.
( c ) BOEM may consider a State's or Regional Transmission Operator/Independent System Operator's process that identifies a transmission project that needs a ROW and/or a RUE grant to achieve its intended purpose. BOEM may determine that there is no competitive interest that would be consistent with OCSLA's goal of allowing the expeditious and orderly development of OCS energy projects, if offering the ROW and/or RUE competitively could challenge the viability of the transmission project intended to be located on State submerged lands and the OCS (e.g., technical and economic feasibility or practicality concerns, including significant delays, by having different entities holding the right to develop the transmission project in State submerged lands and the OCS).
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09

- 23

- 00252

- CV

__________________
IN THE INTEREST OF G.F., S.F., AND A.F.

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 88th District Court Hardin County, Texas Trial Cause No. 63404

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION
After Mother filed a notice to appeal from the trial court’s judgment terminating the parent

- child relationship s between Mother, Father, and their
children

— G.F., S.F., and A.F.

— Mother filed a motion for new trial

. T he trial court granted Mother’s motion on Augus t 17, 2023. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 329b(e).
On August 24 , 202 3 , we notified the parties that unless we received a response explaining why the Court should retain the appeal, we would dismiss the appeal as
moot after August 31, 2023

. We received no objection to the letter that we sent to the parties notifying them that the Court intended to dismiss the appeal.2 Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f). The mandate
will issue with the Court’s judgment

. See id

. 18.6.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM

Submitted on September 13, 2023 Opinion Delivered September 14, 2023 Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Wright, JJ.
5300

5000

5500

5200

4800

5800

5300

5100

5400

4900

5200

4800

5200

5300

4900

5200

4900

5100

5700

5100

5600

5500

5000

5800

5100

5100

5700

5600

5400

4700

5400

5000

5100

4800

5000

5200

5000

5300

5700

5100

5300

4800

81

81

81

81

Deer Creek

Deer

Creek

Whitewater Creek

Deer Creek

Boogs

Defeat Tank

Highway Tank

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS

Antelope

Wells

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS

Playas

Valley

S

m

u

ggler Hills

Whitewater

Mountains

Granite

Pass

Granite

Pass

Eagle

Mountain

Sentinel

Butte

Whitewater

Creek

San

Luis

Pass

Hilo

Peak

Whitewater

Mountains

108°

31° 31

73

2

73

731

63

36

61

35'

000

30"

17'

34

34

7

69

7 7 36

30'

2

66

65

34

FEET

000 FEET

20'

N

35 22'

29 7 7

72

62

34

67

7

31° 27

64

7

30"

000 FEET

27

34

34

7

34

26

7

000

E

31°

34

20'

100

000m

71

33

34

000m

34

35'

34

34

30'

000m

66

15'

7

32

N

480

130

7

37'

7 7

34

108°

67

34

60

108°

70

34

69

34

000m

34

64

7

7

34

32'

34

34

34

72

31°

61

65

34

33

63

7

34

37'

34

E

7 35 108°

37

30"

7 510

30"

15'

7

30"

34

22'

30"

37 32'

32 7

34

68

FEET

70

17'

30

71

30

34

28

68

30"

29

30"

62

34

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

NEW MEXICO

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

WHITEWATER MOUNTAINS, NM-CHH

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WHITEWATER MOUNTAINS QUADRANGLE

NEW MEXICO-CHIHUAHUA

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 12R

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: New Mexico Coordinate System of 1983

(west zone)

Imagery...............................NAIP, January 2005 - May 2009

Roads..............................................©2006-2010 Tele Atlas

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2005

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2001

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.5.11

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

1° 16 ́

22 MILS

9° 40 ́

172 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

12R

YV

CONTOUR INTERVAL 20 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
|     |                                                                                                                       |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|     |                                                                                                                                                      |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                                                                                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                            |
| /s/     TROY A. CLARKE                                            |
| Troy A. ClarkeChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |
#### § 57.19077 Lowering buckets.

Buckets shall be stopped about 15 feet from the shaft bottom to await a signal from one of the crew on the bottom for further lowering.
#### Drina Fitzgerald, Respondent, v. Beatrice Fuller et al., Appellants.

. In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered April 22, 1960, *784in favor of plaintiff Drina Fitzgerald, upon a verdict for $12,000, after a jury trial. The evidence adduced by said plaintiff shows that she suffered a post concussion syndrome and a superimposed psyehoneurosis of the particular variety known as an anxiety state. Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to defendants to abide the event, unless, within 20 days after the entry of the order hereon, said plaintiff shall stipulate to reduce the verdict to $7,000, in which event the judgment, as so reduced, is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the amount of the verdict is grossly excessive for the injuries proved. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Comtech Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey Kang, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period
certified.



Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission, this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.



Signed on this 15thday of May, 2005.



/s/ Jeffrey KangJeffrey Kang




In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Comtech Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Hope Ni, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period certified.



Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.



Signed on this 15thday of May, 2005.



/s/ Hope NiHope Ni
### §119. Electronic databases for nationwide standard numeric jurisdictional codes

(a) Electronic Database.—

(1) Provision of database.—A State may provide an electronic database to a home service provider or, if a State does not provide such an electronic database to home service providers, then the designated database provider may provide an electronic database to a home service provider.

(2) Format.—(A) Such electronic database, whether provided by the State or the designated database provider, shall be provided in a format approved by the American National Standards Institute's Accredited Standards Committee X12, that, allowing for de minimis deviations, designates for each street address in the State, including to the extent practicable, any multiple postal street addresses applicable to one street location, the appropriate taxing jurisdictions, and the appropriate code for each taxing jurisdiction, for each level of taxing jurisdiction, identified by one nationwide standard numeric code.

(B) Such electronic database shall also provide the appropriate code for each street address with respect to political subdivisions which are not taxing jurisdictions when reasonably needed to determine the proper taxing jurisdiction.

(C) The nationwide standard numeric codes shall contain the same number of numeric digits with each digit or combination of digits referring to the same level of taxing jurisdiction throughout the United States using a format similar to FIPS 55–3 or other appropriate standard approved by the Federation of Tax Administrators and the Multistate Tax Commission, or their successors. Each address shall be provided in standard postal format.

(b) Notice; Updates.—A State or designated database provider that provides or maintains an electronic database described in subsection (a) shall provide notice of the availability of the then current electronic database, and any subsequent revisions thereof, by publication in the manner normally employed for the publication of informational tax, charge, or fee notices to taxpayers in such State.

(c) User Held Harmless.—A home service provider using the data contained in an electronic database described in subsection (a) shall be held harmless from any tax, charge, or fee liability that otherwise would be due solely as a result of any error or omission in such database provided by a State or designated database provider. The home service provider shall reflect changes made to such database during a calendar quarter not later than 30 days after the end of such calendar quarter for each State that issues notice of the availability of an electronic database reflecting such changes under subsection (b).

(Added Pub. L. 106–252, §2(a), July 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 627.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date; Application of Amendment

Section effective July 28, 2000, and applicable only to customer bills issued after the first day of the first month beginning more than 2 years after July 28, 2000, see section 3 of Pub. L. 106–252, set out as a note under section 116 of this title.
#### § 57.12003 Trailing cable overload protection.

Individual overload protection or short circuit protection shall be provided for the trailing cables of mobile equipment.
§ 45.6 Address of record and telephone number; independent contractors. ( a ) The address and telephone number required under this part shall be the independent contractor's official address and telephone number for purposes of the Act. Service of documents upon independent contractors may be proved by a Post Office return receipt showing that the documents were delivered to the address of record or that the documents could not be delivered to the address of record because the independent contractor is no longer at that address and has established no forwarding address; because delivery was not accepted at that address; or because no such address exists. Independent contractors may request service by delivery to another appropriate address of record provided by the independent contractor. The telephone number required under this part will be used in connection with the proposed penalty assessment procedures in 30 CFR part 100.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A 1 5 A 1 0 5 1

. W I LLI AM K. BROUGHTON et a l

. v . FEDERAL N ATI O N AL MORTGAGE ASSOCI ATI ON.

Th i s cas e o ri gi n at ed as a d i s p os s es s o ry p ro ceed i n g i n m ag i s t rat e co u rt

. Aft er

a n a d v ers e ru l in g , d efen d an t s W i l l iam an d Ro ch el l e Bro u g h t o n ap p eal ed t h e

m ag i s t rat e co u rt ’ s d eci s i o n t o t h e s t a t e co u rt

. Th e s t at e co u rt g ran t ed s u m m ary ju d g m en t fo r t he p l ai n t i ff, an d t h e Bro u g h t o ns , th ro u gh at t o rn ey Grad y Ro b ert s , fi l ed

t h i s d i rect ap peal . W e, h owev er, l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

. Becau s e t he o rd er at i s su e d i s p o s es o f a d e n o v o ap peal fro m a m ag i s t rat e co u rt
d eci s i o n , t h e Bro u g h t o n s were req ui red to fo l l o w th e d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal p ro ced u res

t o ob t ai n rev i ew b efo re t h i s Co u rt

. See O CGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (1 1 ); S t r a ch a n v. Mer i t o r Mo r t g a g e Co r p. Ea s t , 2 16 Ga. Ap p. 8 2 (4 53 SE2 d 1 1 9) (1 99 5 ). Th ei r fai l u re t o d o

s o d ep ri v es u s o f ju ri s di ct i o n o v er t h i s ap peal , wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 03/05/2015 March 05, 2015
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CGR Real Estate, LLC, CGR RE :

Franklin Park, LP, and CGR Holdings, :

LLC, :

Appellants :

:

v. : No. 780 C.D. 2016

:

Borough Council of The :

Borough of Franklin Park :

:

v. :

:

Gregory and Kathleen Woodworth, :

Helene Donch and Bernard M. :

Avon, Jr. :

CGR Holdings, LLC :

:

v. : No. 971 C.D. 2016

:

Borough Council of the :

Borough of Franklin Park :

:

v. :

:

Gregory and Kathleen :

Woodworth, Helene :

Donch and Bernard :

M. Avon, Jr. :

:

Appeal of: CGR Real Estate, :

LLC and CGR Holdings, LLC :CGR Real Estate, LLC :

:

v. : No. 972 C.D. 2016

:

Borough Council of the :

Borough of Franklin Park :

:

v. :

:

Gregory and Kathleen :

Woodworth, Helene :

Donch and Bernard :

M. Avon, Jr. :

:

Appeal of: CGR Real Estate, :

LLC and CGR Holdings, LLC :

O R D E R

NOW, March 24, 2017

, having considered appell ee Borough Council

of the Borough of Franklin Park’s application for reargument and appell ant s ’ answer

in response thereto , the application is denied.

MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

P resident Judge
METAL / NONMETAL

Close Call

On May 4, 2016, a triaxle dump truck overturned at a crushed stone operation. The 

delivery truck was hauling and dumping material onsite at a designated waste dump. 

Ground conditions had been inspected and the truck stopped at the ramp of the 

dumpsite. A spotter was positioned in a safe location to observe dumping and was in 

constant radio communication with the truck driver. As the driver started to raise the 

truck bed to dump, the truck listed toward the driver’s side. Alerted by warnings from 

the spotter, the driver attempted to lower the bed when the truck overturned. The truck 

driver was wearing a seatbelt and exited the cab unharmed.

 

BEST PRACTICES

• Conduct a thorough examination of ground conditions at dumpsites immediately 

before any work is performed and thereafter as conditions warrant.

• Ensure truck drivers receive proper task training.

• Load material in truck beds evenly to ensure safe dumping.

• Do not attempt to dump material if it sticks in the trucks body.

• Maintain adequate berms and stop blocks where required.

• Always wear seat belts when operating mobile equipment.
EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form F-3, No. 333-12074, Registration No. 333-115598, Registration No.
333-117954 and Registration No. 333-127491 and Registration Statements on Form
S-8, Registration No. 333-12844 and Registration No. 333-111437, pertaining to
the RADA Electronic Industries Ltd.'s 1999 and 2003 Stock Option Plans, and
warrants to directors and pertaining to the Prospectus of RADA Electronic
Industries Ltd. for the registration of 13,507,146 shares of its Ordinary shares
of our report dated March 30, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of RADA Electronic Industries Ltd. included in the Annual Report on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005.



                                             /S/ Kost Forer Gabbay and Kasierer
                                             Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasirer
                                             A Member of Ernst & Young Global

Tel Aviv, March 30, 2006