alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 963.10 Eligible resident-owned businesses. To be eligible for the alternative procurement process provided by this part, a business must meet the following requirements, and must submit evidence to the PHA, in the form described below, or as the PHA may require, that shows how each requirement has been met. ( a ) *Legally formed business.* The business shall submit certified copies of any State, county, or municipal licenses that may be required of the business to engage in the type of business activity for which it was formed. Where applicable (as for example, in the case of corporations), the business also shall submit a certified copy of its corporate charter or other organizational document that verifies that the business was properly formed in accordance with State law.
( b ) *Resident-owned business.* The business shall submit a certification that it is a resident-owned business as defined by this part. The business shall disclose to the PHA all owners of the business, and each owner's percentage of ownership interest in the business. The business also shall disclose all individuals who possess the power to make the day-to-day, as well as major, decisions on matters of management, policy, and operations (management officials). The business shall identify all owners and management officials who are not public housing residents, and shall disclose any relationship that these owners and officials may have to a business (resident- or non-resident-owned) engaged in the type of business activity with which the resident-owned business is engaged. For purposes of this part, “relationship” means employment by, or having an ownership interest in, a business. The business also shall submit such evidence as the PHA may require to verify that the owner or owners identified as public housing residents reside within public housing of the PHA.
( c ) *Responsibility to complete contract.* The business shall submit evidence sufficient to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the PHA that the business has the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of the proposed contract. Consideration will be given to various factors, including but not limited to those identified in 24 CFR 85.36(b)(8) (as revised April 1, 2013) and also to such matters as proof of completion of courses in business administration or financial management, and proof of job training or apprenticeship in the particular trade, business, profession, or occupation.
( d ) *Limitation on alternative procurement contract awards.* The business shall submit a certification as to the number of contracts awarded, and the dollar amount of each contract award received, under the alternative procurement process provided by this part. A resident-owned business is not eligible to participate in the alternative procurement process provided by this part if the resident-owned business has received under this process one or more contracts with a total combined dollar value of $1,000,000.
[57 FR 20189, May 11, 1992, as amended at 59 FR 33895, June 30, 1994; 80 FR 75942, Dec. 7, 2015]
EXHIBIT
99.3  From: Robert L. Chapman,
Jr.
 Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009
8:07 AM
 To: 'Michael W. Klinger
 Cc: 'Michael Kosemund' 'Clarke
H. Bailey' 'Roger J. Morgan'
 Subject: EDCI Holdings (EDCI):
EDC: Personnel: Michael Kosemund Non-Communication with Supervisor
 
 March 13,
2009
 
 MWK,
 
 I was
shocked to learn today that you
had not spoken with EDC GmbH MD of Finance Michael Kosemund (“M-K”), who began
reporting to you directly on February 11, 2009 (see below), in over one
week (since Thursday, March 5, 2009 per your WLM IM to be earlier today,
and follow up conversation confirming that; you stated you had WLM IM’d him on
Friday, March 6, 2009).  Moreover, even earlier today, hours passed
since my communicating my concern over this lack of communication and your
finally contacting M-K (after my fifth WLM IM asking  you about this
subject, finally concluding with my WLM IM, "WHY HAVE YOU NOT CALLED HIM TODAY?"
at 10:50 a.m. EST/4:50 p.m. CET. )
 
 This
lapse in communication is puzzling to me in light of the following events clearly requiring
close communication between EDC GmbH's MD of Finance and EDC's
CFO:
 
 1)
03/09/2009 Audit Committee meeting
 2)
03/10/2009 EDC Board Meeting
 3)
03/10-13/2009:  EDC Ltd./Blackburn - GmbH/Hannover Consolidation
Feasibility Study Presentation III Preparation
 4)
03/13/2009:  EDC Ltd./Blackburn - GmbH/Hannover Consolidation Feasibility
Study Presentation III
 
 RJM has
informed me today that this week, M-K (who has communicated that he is too ill
with the flu to assist EDC in the EDC Ltd./Blackburn - GmbH/Hannover
Consolidation Feasibility Study for 03/13/2009 presentation; since cancelled)
has called UID
daily.  However,
neither you nor M-K have called each other on these dates.  How is
this possible given the reporting lines re-defined in
February?
 
 What also
is puzzling is as I am typing this E-mail at 8:00 a.m. PST, I see that you have
now given me a new "story" to explain M-K's absence:  " I just talked to
M-K.  At issue is a hearing problem that has reoccurred [sic].  His
doctor recommended [sic] 2 weeks and he is taking less.  He was just
returning from the doctor when I called."  Again, a) how is it that you are so
unaware of the status of your top EDC GmbH subordinate and b) that EDC's CEO
(RLCjr) has to be the one to get you to communicate with this
individual?
 
 This
modus operandi of extremely weak communications cannot continue.  It must
end at once, as your continuance of exhibiting weak compliance with your
fiduciary duty of due care puts EDC, and EDCI, at serious risk.
 
 RLCjr
 
 cc:       
KEB/CHB/RJM
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9588 

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to issue certain regulations with 

respect to the safe transportation of lithium-ion batteries, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2024 

Ms. TITUS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to issue certain 

regulations with respect to the safe transportation of 

lithium-ion batteries, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Thermal Runaway Re5 duction Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR SAFE TRANSPORT OF LITH7 IUM-ION BATTERIES. 

8 Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 

9 of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9588 IH

1 (1) work with the United Nations Sub2 committee of Experts on the Transportation of Dan3 gerous Goods to revise the design tests in subsection 

4 38.3 of the UN Manual of Tests and Criteria to de5 velop an impact test for lithium batteries installed in 

6 transport units and transported under UN 3536 to 

7 allow improved ability to withstand forces experi8 enced in transport accidents without going into ther9 mal runaway; and 

10 (2) issue such regulations as are necessary to 

11 amend section 173.185 of title 49, Code of Federal 

12 Regulations to require lithium cell or batteries (ex13 cept smaller cells and batteries described in such 

14 section) under subsection (a)(4) and (d) of such sec15 tion to be offered for transport at a state of charge 

16 not exceeding 30 percent of the rated capacity of 

17 such battery (determined through the guidance and 

18 methodology under section 38.3.2.3 of the Manual of 

19 Tests and Criteria of the United Nations) and au20 thorize the transportation of lithium-ion cells and 

21 batteries at a state of charge greater than 30 per22 cent of the rated capacity of such battery only under 

23 conditions approved by the Associate Administrator 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 9588 IH

1 in accordance with the requirements in subpart H of 

2 part 107 of such title. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### Frank E. Scott, impleaded, etc. *v.*L. B. Mantonya.

*Filed at Ottawa January 19, 1897.*

The decision in the case of *Fortune*v. *Bartolomei, (ante,*p. 51,) disposes of the question here involved.

*Scott*v. *Mantonya,*60 Ill. App. 481, affirmed.

Writ of Error to the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on writ of error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. John Gibbons, Judge, presiding.

Bulkley, Gray & More, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Justice Cartwright

delivered the opinion of the court:

A judgment by confession against Frank E. Scott, plaintiff in error, and Ward Stockton, was entered in the circuit court of Cook county in favor of defendant in error, in pursuance of a warrant of attorney contained in a lease, authorizing such confession for rent due by the terms of the lease. The judgment was for §210, for rent due and payable in cash by the terms of the lease, together with costs. Plaintiff in error entered a special appearance, and moved the court to set aside the judgment on the ground that the court had no jurisdiction over him. His motion was overruled, and the action of the circuit court has been sustained by the Appellate Court. The record is brought here under a certificate of importance.

The only question in the case is whether the warrant of attorney was sufficient to give the circuit court jurisdiction to enter the judgment. This question was considered in the case of *Fortune*v. *Bartolomei, (ante,*p. 51,) where there was a lease with similar stipulations and a *474like power of attorney. It was there held that authority to confess judgment was lawfully conferred by such a warrant, and the decision in that case disposes of the question raised in this.

The judgment will be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
#### § 57.19009 Position indicator.

An accurate and reliable indicator of the position of the cage, skip, bucket, or cars in the shaft shall be provided.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9611 

To increase the minimum disaster loan amount for which the Small Business 

Administration may require collateral, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 16, 2024 

Mr. NEGUSE (for himself and Mr. OBERNOLTE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To increase the minimum disaster loan amount for which 

the Small Business Administration may require collateral, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Dis5 aster Damage Fairness Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COLLATERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DISASTER 

7 LOANS. 

8 Section 7(d)(6) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

9 636(d)(6)) is amended, in the third proviso— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9611 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘$14,000’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘$50,000’’; and 

3 (2) by striking ‘‘major disaster’’ and inserting 

4 ‘‘disaster’’. 

5 SEC. 3. GAO REPORT ON DEFAULT RATES. 

6 Not later than 3 years after the date of the enact7 ment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United 

8 States shall submit to the Committee on Small Business 

9 and Entrepreneurship of the Senate and the Committee 

10 on Small Business of the House of Representatives a re11 port on the performance, including the default rate, of 

12 loans made under section 7(b)(1) of the Small Business 

13 Act (15 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)), and the impact of the amend14 ments to collateral amounts made under section 2 of this 

15 Act on the performance of those loans, during the pe16 riod— 

17 (1) beginning on September 30, 2020; and 

18 (2) ending on the date on that is 2 years after 

19 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
### §§196 to 198. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 196, Aug. 9, 1954, ch. 659, §1, 68 Stat. 675; Pub. L. 96–70, title III, §3302(c), Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 498; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(152), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 167, was redesignated as and transferred to section 56309 of Title 46, Shipping, by Pub. L. 115–91, div. C, title XXXV, §3504(a)(1), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1911.

Section 197, Aug. 9, 1954, ch. 659, §2, 68 Stat. 675; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(152), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 167, was redesignated as and transferred to section 56310 of Title 46, Shipping, by Pub. L. 115–91, div. C, title XXXV, §3504(b)(1), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1912.

Section 198, Aug. 9, 1954, ch. 659, §3, 68 Stat. 675; Pub. L. 89–670, §6(b)(1), (2), Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 938; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(152), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 167, was redesignated as and transferred to section 56311 of Title 46, Shipping, by Pub. L. 115–91, div. C, title XXXV, §3504(c)(1), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1912.
## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

January 12, 2024 SC-2023-0355 Mobile Infirmary Association d/b/a Mobile Infirmary Medical Center and Gulf Health Hospitals, Inc., d/b/a Thomas Hospital v. Wayne Fagerstrom, individually and as administrator of the Estate of Sylvia Fagerstrom, deceased (Appeal from Baldwin Circuit Court: CV-20-900001).

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT WHEREAS, the ruling on the application for rehearing filed in this case and indicated below was entered in this cause on January 12, 2024: Application Overruled. No Opinion. Sellers, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Shaw, Wise, Bryan, Mendheim, Stewart, Mitchell, and Cook, JJ., concur. WHEREAS, the appeal in the above referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was entered in this cause on November 17, 2023: Reversed and Remanded. Sellers, J. – Shaw, Wise, Bryan, Stewart, Mitchell, and Cook, JJ., concur. Parker, C.J., and Mendheim, J., concur in the result. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness my hand and seal.Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
#### § 57.14114 Air valves for pneumatic equipment.

A manual master quick-close type air valve shall be installed on all pneumatic-powered equipment if there is a hazard of uncontrolled movement when the air supply is activated. The valve shall be closed except when the equipment is being operated.

[53 FR 32528, Aug. 25, 1988; 53 FR 44588, Nov. 4, 1988]
EXHIBIT 32.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
               RULE 13a-14(b)



In connection with the Annual Report of Gallery of History, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Rod Lynam, Chief Financial Office of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge, that:

1.	 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



/s/ Rod Lynam
_____________
Rod Lynam
Chief Financial Officer

December 28, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 581.23 Effective date of leases.

Leases issued under the regulations in this part shall be dated and become effective as of the first day of the month following the date leases are signed on behalf of the lessor except that, upon written request, a lease may be dated and become effective as of the first day of the month within which it is signed on behalf of the lessor.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 348 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for an enhanced 

deduction for qualified residence interest on acquisition indebtedness 

for heritage homes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2005 

Mr. PLATTS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

for an enhanced deduction for qualified residence interest 

on acquisition indebtedness for heritage homes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Heritage Homes Tax 

5 Incentive Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•HR 348 IH 

1 SEC. 2. ENHANCED DEDUCTION FOR QUALIFIED RESI2 DENCE INTEREST ON ACQUISITION INDEBT3 EDNESS FOR HERITAGE HOMES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (h) of section 163 of 

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to disallow6 ance of deduction for personal interest) is amended by 

7 adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(6) HERITAGE HOME.— 

9 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of quali10 fied residence interest which is paid or accrued 

11 on acquisition indebtedness incurred with re12 spect to the heritage home of the taxpayer, the 

13 deduction under subsection (a) shall be 125 

14 percent of the amount otherwise allowable by 

15 subsection (a). 

16 ‘‘(B) HERITAGE HOME.—For purposes of 

17 subparagraph (A), the term ‘heritage home’ 

18 means the principal residence of the taxpayer— 

19 ‘‘(i) the construction of which was 

20 substantially completed at least 50 years 

21 before the beginning of the taxable year, 

22 ‘‘(ii) which is a certified historic struc23 ture (as defined in section 47(c)(3)(A)), 

24 ‘‘(iii) which is located in a registered 

25 historic district (as defined in section 

26 47(c)(3)(B)), or 
3 

•HR 348 IH 

1 ‘‘(iv) which is located on land which 

2 was platted for residential purposes at 

3 least 50 years prior to the beginning of the 

4 taxable year.’’. 

5 (b) DEDUCTION ALLOWED WHETHER OR NOT TAX6 PAYER ITEMIZES DEDUCTIONS.—Subsection (a) of section 

7 62 of such Code (defining adjusted gross income) is 

8 amended by inserting after paragraph (19) (relating to 

9 costs involving discrimination suits, etc.) the following new 

10 paragraph: 

11 ‘‘(21) QUALIFIED RESIDENCE INTEREST ON AC12 QUISITION INDEBTEDNESS FOR HERITAGE HOMES.— 

13 The deduction under section 163 for qualified resi14 dence interest on acquisition indebtedness with re15 spect to the heritage home of the taxpayer. Terms 

16 used in the preceding sentence have the meanings 

17 given such terms by section 163.’’ 

18 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

19 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

20 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
§ 57.22304 Approved equipment (II-A mines). ( a ) Cutting and drilling equipment used at a face or bench shall be approved by MSHA under the applicable requirements of 30 CFR parts 18 through 36.
( b ) While cutting or drilling is in progress, equipment not approved by MSHA under the applicable requirements of 30 CFR parts 18 through 36 shall remain at least 100 feet from the face or bench being mined.
( c ) Tests for methane shall be conducted immediately before nonapproved equipment is taken to a face or bench after blasting.
( d ) Mine power transformers and stationary equipment not approved by MSHA under the applicable requirements of 30 CFR parts 18 through 36 shall be installed in fresh air or downwind from an atmospheric methane monitor sensor.
Order entered July 30, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00782-CV

FRISCO SQUARE DEVELOPERS, L.L.C., Appellant

V.

GEARBOX SOFTWARE, L.L.C., Appellee

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 429-02307-2015

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s July 28, 2015 unopposed motion for an extension of time to file 

a brief. Appellant shall file a brief by AUGUST 20, 2015. We caution appellant that no further 

extension of time will be granted in this accelerated absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
### §44910. Agreements on aircraft sabotage, aircraft hijacking, and airport security

The Secretary of State shall seek multilateral and bilateral agreement on strengthening enforcement measures and standards for compliance related to aircraft sabotage, aircraft hijacking, and airport security.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1212.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 44910 | 49 App.:1515 (note). | Aug. 8, 1985, Pub. L. 99–83, §556, 99 Stat. 227. |

Section
§ 57.14206 Securing movable parts. ( a ) When moving mobile equipment between workplaces, booms, forks, buckets, beds, and similar movable parts of the equipment shall be positioned in the travel mode and, if required for safe travel, mechanically secured.
( b ) When mobile equipment is unattended or not in use, dippers, buckets and scraper blades shall be lowered to the ground. Other movable parts, such as booms, shall be mechanically secured or positioned to prevent movement which would create a hazard to persons.