alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income, Balance Sheet, Statement of
Cash Flows, Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity and Basic and
Diluted Earnings per Share of Common Stock and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000936340
<NAME> DTE ENERGY COMPANY

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             158
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      676
<ALLOWANCES>                                        22
<INVENTORY>                                        325
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,360
<PP&E>                                          12,894
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,671
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,369
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,530
<BONDS>                                          4,120
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,918
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,963
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,369
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,182
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      967
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     2
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  83
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    130
<INCOME-TAX>                                        13
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                117
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       117
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.81


</TABLE>
Appeal No. 76-52.

#### Rhode Island Hospital Trust National Bank, *Trustee u/w of Laura Sims v.*Richard J. Israel, *Attorney General, et al.*

*Robert B. Gates,*for petitioner.

*Adolph Anderson, Charles Drummey,*for Rhode Island Lung Association.

*Charles McGovern,*for Children’s Friend and Services, for defendant.

The motion of the Rhode Island Lung Association to remand this case to the Superior Court is denied.

Kelleher, J., not participating.
### §1885c. Reporting

#### (a) Semiannual report

Not less frequently than once every 6 months, the Attorney General shall, in a manner consistent with national security, the Rules of the House of Representatives, the Standing Rules of the Senate, and Senate Resolution 400 of the 94th Congress or any successor Senate resolution, fully inform the congressional intelligence committees, the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives concerning the implementation of this subchapter.

#### (b) Content

Each report made under subsection (a) shall include—

(1) any certifications made under section 1885a of this title;

(2) a description of the judicial review of the certifications made under section 1885a of this title; and

(3) any actions taken to enforce the provisions of section 1885b of this title.

(Pub. L. 95–511, title VIII, §804, as added Pub. L. 110–261, title II, §201, July 10, 2008, 122 Stat. 2470.)
### §3611. Cryptologic research grant program

#### (a) Authorization

The Director of the National Security Agency may make grants to private individuals and institutions for the conduct of cryptologic research. An application for a grant under this section may not be approved unless the Director determines that the award of the grant would be clearly consistent with the national security.

#### (b) Conduct of program

The grant program established by subsection (a) shall be conducted in accordance with chapter 63 of title 31 to the extent that such chapter is consistent with and in accordance with section 3605 of this title.

#### (c) Authority limited to availability of appropriated funds

The authority of the Director to make grants under this section is effective for any fiscal year only to the extent that appropriated funds are available for such purpose.

(Pub. L. 86–36, §13, as added Pub. L. 97–89, title VI, §603, Dec. 4, 1981, 95 Stat. 1158.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified in a note under section 402 of this title prior to editorial reclassification as this section.

In subsec. (b), "chapter 63 of title 31" substituted for "the Federal Grant and Cooperative Agreement Act of 1977 (41 U.S.C. 501 et seq.)" and "such chapter" substituted for "such Act" on authority of Pub. L. 97–258, §4(b), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1067, the first section of which enacted Title 31, Money and Finance.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1981, see section 806 of Pub. L. 97–89, set out as a note under section 1621 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
### §2357d. Administrative support

All United States departments and agencies shall provide, to the extent permitted by law, such information and assistance as may be requested by the coordination mechanism established pursuant to section 2357b of this title, in carrying out its functions and activities under this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 107–228, div. B, title XIII, §1336, Sept. 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 1451.)
#### § 581.15 Tract size.

The size of the tracts to be offered for lease shall be as determined by the Secretary and specified in the leasing notice. It is intended that tracts offered for lease be sufficiently large to include potentially minable OCS mineral orebodies. When the presence of any minable orebody is unknown and additional prospecting is needed to discover and delineate OCS minerals, the size of tracts specified in the leasing notice may be relatively large.
#### § 57.19061 Maximum hoisting speeds.

The safe speed for hoisting persons shall be determined for each shaft, and this speed shall not be exceeded. Persons shall not be hoisted at a speed faster than 2,500 feet per minute, except in an emergency.
### §32301. Definitions

In this chapter—

(1) "crash avoidance" means preventing or mitigating a crash;

(2) "crashworthiness" means the protection a passenger motor vehicle gives its passengers against personal injury or death from a motor vehicle accident; and

(3) "damage susceptibility" means the susceptibility of a passenger motor vehicle to damage in a motor vehicle accident.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1035; Pub. L. 112–141, div. C, title I, §31305(a), July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 765.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 32301 | 15:1901(13), (14). | Oct. 20, 1972, Pub. L. 92–513, §2(13), (14), 86 Stat. 948; Dec. 22, 1975, Pub. L. 94–163, §301, 89 Stat. 901; Oct. 10, 1980, Pub. L. 96–425, §8(a)(2), 94 Stat. 1828; Oct. 25, 1984, Pub. L. 98–547, §101(b), 98 Stat. 2767. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2012—Pub. L. 112–141 added par. (1), redesignated former pars. (1) and (2) as (2) and (3), respectively, and, in par. (2), substituted "; and" for period at end.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2012 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 112–141 effective Oct. 1, 2012, see section 3(a) of Pub. L. 112–141, set out as an Effective and Termination Dates of 2012 Amendment note under section 101 of Title 23, Highways.
### §§1805a to 1805c. Repealed. Pub. L. 110–261, title IV, §403(a)(1)(A), July 10, 2008, 122 Stat. 2473

Section 1805a, Pub. L. 95–511, title I, §105A, as added Pub. L. 110–55, §2, Aug. 5, 2007, 121 Stat. 552, related to clarification of electronic surveillance of persons outside the United States.

Section 1805b, Pub. L. 95–511, title I, §105B, as added Pub. L. 110–55, §2, Aug. 5, 2007, 121 Stat. 552, related to additional procedure for authorizing certain acquisitions concerning persons located outside the United States.

Section 1805c, Pub. L. 95–511, title I, §105C, as added Pub. L. 110–55, §3, Aug. 5, 2007, 121 Stat. 555, related to submission to court review of procedures.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective July 10, 2008, except as provided in section 404 of Pub. L. 110–261, set out as a Transition Procedures note under section 1801 of this title, see section 402 of Pub. L. 110–261, set out as an Effective Date of 2008 Amendment note under section 1801 of this title.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

Mr. Lee B. Zcugin 

Hunton & Williams LLP 

1900 K Street, N.W. 

Washinglon, D.C. 20006-1109 

Dear Mr. Zeugin : 

MAY 18 2011 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RAOIATION 

Thank you for your letter of May 6, 201 1, to Administrator Jackson regarding the Utility Air Regulatory 

Group's identification of discrepancies in the way historical mercury emissions data were recalculated 

and used in establishing the mercury maximum achievable control technology (MACT) floor in the 

proposed Mercury and Air Toxies Standards (MATS) rule. We have revised these mercury calculations 

and will include them in the docket this week to ensure that this information is publicly available. We do 

not expect this change to have any appreciable impact on the controls that will be needed for compliance 

or on the analyses underlying the proposal. 

We recognize that your primary concern involves the mercury limit for existing coal power plants. The 

revised calculations result in a slight increase of that limit, from 1.0 to 1.2 pounds per trillion British 

thermal units. We estimate that this change wi ll lessen our expected mercury reductions by about half of 

a ton, not changing our projected 90 percent reduction from the mercury in the coal used by power 

plants. 

We remain committed to following the law and sound science and providing, in a timely way, the public 

health protections required by the Clean Air Act. Toxic air pollutants like mercury from coal- and oilfired power plants have been shown to cause neurological damage, including lower IQ, in children 

exposed in the womb and during early development. The proposed standards, as you are aware, also 

address emissions of other toxic metals linked with cancer, such as arsenic, chromium, and nickel. 

Mercury and many of the other toxic pollutants also damage the environment and pollute our nation's 

lakes, streams, and fish. In addition, cutting these toxic pollutants also reduces fine particle pollution, 

which causes premature death, heart disease, and workdays losl to illness and asthma. 

Your letter also noted other possible discrepancies regarding aspects of OUf calculations. As we move 

forward to develop the final rule, I can assure you that we will fully consider these and any other 

comments you provide during the comment period. As usual, we will continue to update the docket as 

comments come in. 

Imernet Address (URl) • hUpJ/Www.epa.gov 

RKycllKllRKyclllble • Printed with Vegelable Oil Based Inks on tOO"/o Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
If you have further questions regarding this proposed rule, please contact Bill Maxwell of my staff at 

(9 19) 54 1-5430. 

Sincerely, 

G na McCarthy 

Assistant Administrator
```

[Federal Register: March 4, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 42)]
[Notices]               
[Page 9878]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr04mr10-44]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, March 10, 2010; 2 p.m.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Closed to the Public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Compliance Weekly Report--Commission Briefing

    The staff will brief the Commission on the status of various 
compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: March 1, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-4697 Filed 3-2-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
Exhibit 32


                         CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  each  of the
undersigned   certifies  that  the  periodic  report  fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and that information  contained in this periodic report fairly presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of The
Deltona Corporation.


/S/ Antony Gram
-------------------------------
Antony Gram
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2003



/S/ Robert O. Moore
--------------------------------
Robert O. Moore
Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2003


     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to The Deltona  Corporation  and will be retained by The Deltona
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

     The foregoing  certification  accompanies the issuer's  Quarterly report on
Form 10-Q and is not filed as provided in SEC Release Nos. 33-8212,  34-4751 and
IC-25967, dated June 30, 2003.



<PAGE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 2 2 , 2019

NO. 03

- 18

- 00758

- CR

Ex parte Jordan Graham Bice

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF HAYS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BA KER, AND KELLY AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the trial court ’ s order denying appellant ’ s application for writ of habeas

corpus

. Havi ng reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was

no reversible error in the order

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order denying
appellant ’ s application for writ of habeas corpus

. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to
pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
EXHIBIT
99.21   From: Robert L. Chapman, Jr.
 Sent: Wednesday, March 18,
2009 3:04 PM
 To: 'Michael W.
Klinger'
 Subject: EDCI Holdings (EDCI):
Personnel: Michael Klinger: Consolidation Feasibility Study Performance
Problem
  March 18,
2009
  MWK,
  Needless
to say, I continue to be concerned by incidents such as those described
below.
  RLCjr
   ----------
  03/18/2009
4:00 a.m. PST: RLCjr attempts to start call, but MWK/MDN not dialed in. RLCjr
WLM’s MWK/MDN, and RJM then called MWK asking him to MWK onto the call; MWK gets
on the call at 4:03 a.m. PST, explaining his tardiness with, “I was not looking
at the clock.” RLCjr then asks KEB to be sure EDC Chairman gets on the call as
well. 4:10 a.m. PST: CHB confirms that he didn’t know call was still on. RLCjr
asks, “Which person employed by EDC is responsible for the presentation for this
call not being ready on schedule.” RJM responds, “It looks like MWK distributed
the wrong presentation file – a PowerPoint presentation. This happened during
the early hours of the European morning.” RLCjr asks, “Mike Klinger, is this
accurate?” MWK responds, “Yes, this is true.” RJM offers solution that since
have all numbers locked down yesterday, just need to get them into the right
file. RLCjr suggests that MDN cover getting the PowerPoint up to speed for RJM
until MWK’s watch/clock and computer are fixed, and RJM says needs to know how
long MDN will require. MDN answers in less than one hour. RJM then says he would
like to have the call in four hours, and 8:00 a.m. PST/11:00 a.m. EST should be
enough, but CHB asks for certainty. 9:00 a.m./12:00 Noon EST.
  03/18/2009
3:16 a.m. PST: RJM EM’s internal conf. call group, writing, “I am sorry to have
to inform you that the presentation is not ready. The numbers were finalised
yesterday but it appears that something has gone wrong when the numbers have
been pulled together in the US overnight. Many numbers it seems are not the
final versions and we can not access the linked files to the power point as they
are held on the Fishers server. Unfortunately I am unable to get this fixed at
this end. It will take a number of hours working with the US finance guys to get
this sorted out as the numbers are finalised. I can only suggest that we have
the call later today.”
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of China Industrial Waste Management, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Xin Guo, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 15, 2011
By:
/s/ Xin GuoXin GuoChief Financial Officer(principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)





This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 57.22217 Seals and stoppings (I-A, I-B, and I-C mines).

All seals, and those stoppings that separate main intake from main return airways, shall be of substantial construction and constructed of noncombustible materials, except that stoppings constructed of brattice materials may be used in face areas.
#### The Marietta Paper Manufacturing Company *vs.*Faw.

[Wabneb, Chief Justice, being engaged in presiding over the senate organized as a court of impeachment, did not sit in this case.]

The bill of exceptions was certified by the presiding judge on the 25th ■ of April, 1879. Service of the same was acknowledged by defendant’s counsel in the following words, on the 6th of-May, 1879: “Due and legal service acknowledged on the within bill of exceptions, and copy and all further service hereby waived.”

A motion was made to dismiss the bill of exceptions because service was not acknowledged with'in ten days. ■ The bill of exceptions must be dismissed. The question is not an open one. 50 *6a.,*858; Code, §4259. The act of 1877 does not cure the defect. That act is ■ intended to cure want of sufficient service where the party not only' waives the defect but consents to try the case, and such is its language.

Writ of error dismissed.

Jackson, Justice.
NO. 07-02-0116-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	AUGUST 21, 2002

	______________________________

	DAVID JOE CORTEZ,

			Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

			Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 47TH DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

	NO. 13671-A; HON. DAVID L. GLEASON, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.

	David Joe Cortez (appellant) appeals his conviction for delivery of a controlled substance, a first degree felony.  Pursuant to a plea of guilty, but without benefit of an agreed recommendation from the State as to punishment, the trial court found him guilty and assessed punishment at thirty years in the Texas Department of Corrections Institutional Division.  Appellant now appeals his conviction. 

	Appellant’s appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw, together with an Anders1 brief, wherein she certifies that, after diligently searching the record, she has concluded that appellant’s appeal is without merit.  Along with her brief, appellate counsel has attached a copy of a letter sent to appellant informing him of counsel’s belief that there was no reversible error and of appellant’s right to appeal pro se.  By letter dated July 11, 2002, this court notified appellant of his right to file his own brief or response by August 7, 2002, if he wished to do so.  To date, appellant has failed to file a response or a motion for extension of time to file same.

	 In her Anders brief, appellant’s counsel explained why she concluded that no arguable basis for appeal existed.  She considered such things as the 1) sufficiency of the indictment to state an offense and invoke the trial court’s jurisdiction, 2) pre-trial motions regarding appellant’s juvenile record to be used at punishment which are permitted by the Texas Family Code, §58.007(g), 3) voluntariness of appellant’s plea and the statutory admonitions given by the trial court, 4) existence of evidence supporting the finding of guilt, and 5) fact that punishment was assessed within the range allowed by law.

	Thereafter, we conducted our own review of the record to assess the accuracy of appellate counsel’s conclusions and to uncover any error, reversible or otherwise, pursuant to Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  Our own review not only confirmed the accuracy of appellate counsel’s representations but also failed to reveal any error. 

	Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is granted and the judgment is affirmed. 

                                         				Brian Quinn 

                                                                             Justice 

Do not publish.
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: July 29 , 2015 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR– 2013 - 0602 FROM: Lora Strine , EPA SUBJECT: July 22 , 2015 Phone Call Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing

Power Plants **SUMMARY** A phone call was held between EPA and David Thornton , State of Minnesota on July 22 , 2015 to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants . The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES S** **tate of M innesota**  David Thornton **US EPA** Lora Strine
Exhibit 32.3


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Altria Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Martin J. Barrington, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ MARTIN J. BARRINGTON


Martin J. Barrington


Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President


June 15, 2017