alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 285.708 What are the CVA's or project engineer's primary duties for fabrication and installation review? ( a ) The CVA or project engineer must do all of the following: ( 1 ) Use good engineering judgment and practice in conducting an independent assessment of the fabrication and installation activities and of the commissioning of Critical Safety Systems and Equipment;
( 2 ) Monitor the fabrication and installation of the facility and the commissioning of Critical Safety Systems and Equipment as required by paragraph (b) of this section;
( 3 ) Make periodic onsite inspections while fabrication is in progress and verify the items required by § 285.709;
( 4 ) Make periodic onsite inspections while installation is in progress and satisfy the requirements of § 285.710;
( 5 ) Certify in Project Verification Reports that project components are fabricated and installed in accordance with accepted engineering practices and to a nationally or internationally recognized quality assurance standard or to an equivalent alternate means of quality assurance considered on a case-by-case basis, your BOEM-approved SAP, COP, or GAP (as applicable), and your FIR. If multiple CVAs are involved in your project, the general project CVA must submit the final report containing such certification for the project. The Project Verification Report must identify the location of all records pertaining to facility fabrication and installation as required in § 285.714(c);
( 6 ) Provide records documenting that Critical Safety Systems and Equipment are commissioned in accordance with the procedures identified in § 285.702(a)(8); and
( 7 ) Identify the location of all records pertaining to commissioning of Critical Safety Systems and Equipment, as required in § 285.714(c).
( b ) To comply with paragraphs (a)(4) and (5) of this section, the CVA or project engineer must monitor the fabrication and installation of the facility and the commissioning of Critical Safety Systems and Equipment to certify that they have been built and installed according to your FDRs and FIRs. ( 1 ) If the CVA or project engineer finds that either fabrication and installation procedures or Critical Safety Systems and Equipment commissioning procedures, or both, have been changed or design specifications have been modified, the CVA or project engineer must inform you and BSEE; and
( 2 ) If you accept the modifications, you must also inform BSEE.
[89 FR 42718, May 15, 2024]
### §3309. Notification of establishment of advisory committee

The Director of National Intelligence and the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency shall each notify the congressional intelligence committees each time each such Director creates an advisory committee. Each notification shall include—

(1) a description of such advisory committee, including the subject matter of such committee;

(2) a list of members of such advisory committee; and

(3) in the case of an advisory committee created by the Director of National Intelligence, the reasons for a determination by the Director under section 1003(b)(3) of title 5 that an advisory committee cannot comply with the requirements of chapter 10 of title 5.

(Pub. L. 111–259, title IV, §410(b), Oct. 7, 2010, 124 Stat. 2725; Pub. L. 113–126, title III, §329(b)(1), July 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 1406; Pub. L. 117–286, §4(a)(319), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4341.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified as a note under section 405 of this title prior to editorial reclassification as this section.

#### Amendments

2022—Par. (3). Pub. L. 117–286 substituted "section 1003(b)(3) of title 5 that an advisory committee cannot comply with the requirements of chapter 10 of title 5." for "section 4(b)(3) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) that an advisory committee cannot comply with the requirements of such Act."

2014—Pub. L. 113–126 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to annual report on advisory committees created by Director of National Intelligence and Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, contents of report, and inclusion of reasons for ODNI exclusion of advisory committee from Federal Advisory Committee Act.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definition

For definition of "congressional intelligence committees" referred to in text, see section 2 of Pub. L. 111–259, set out as a note under section 3003 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5

<S>                                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                                          1,250
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 314,877
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 (277,310)
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               38,817
<PP&E>                                                         25,462
<DEPRECIATION>                                                (12,180)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 52,099
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         405,284
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                        53
<COMMON>                                                       79,595
<OTHER-SE>                                                   (432,833)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   59,099
<SALES>                                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    0
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            1,197,634
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (1,197,634)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (1,198,434)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (1,198,434)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   (0.02)



</TABLE>
|     |                                                                                                                            |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|     |                                                                                                                                                     |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |

|                       |
|-----------------------|
|                       |  |
| Date:  March 26, 2014 | /s/ Peter J. Pounds |
|                  | Peter J. PoundsChief Financial OfficerGeneral Communication, Inc. |
STATE OF LOUISIANA 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

MICHAEL HARBOUR AND TASMAN 

HOLDINGS, LLC 

VERSUS 

THE CITY OF BATON ROUGE AND 

THE PARISH OF EAST BATON 

ROUGE 

NO. 2023 CW 1366 

FEBRUARY 22, 2024 

In Re: City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge, 

applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District 

Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 662146. 

BEFORE: THERIOT, PENZATO, AND GREENE, JJ. 

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Re la tor failed to provide a copy of 

all exhibits filed with Michael Harbour and Tasman Holdings, 

LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment in violation of Uniform Rules 

of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rule 4-5 (C) (8). In particular, 

the Motion for Summary Judgment was filed with a certified copy 

of a prior Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed on July 5, 

2022 along with its exhibits and memorandum, and relator failed 

to provide copies of Exhibits B-2, B-3, and B-4 to the affidavit 

of Brett P. Furr (Exhibit B) and copies of the City-Parish's 

"Supplemental Responses to Plaintiff's Discovery Requests" 

(Exhibit C) filed with the prior Motion for Partial Summary 

Judgment. 

Supplementation of this writ application and/or an 

application for rehearing will not be considered. Uniform Rules 

of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2-18.7 & 4-9. 

In the event relator seeks to file a new application with 

this court, it must contain all pertinent documentation, the 

missing items noted above, and must comply with Uniform Rules of 

Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rule 2-12. 2. Any new application 

must be filed on or before March 1, 2024 and must contain a copy 

of this ruling. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

otc,O 

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT 

FOR THE COURT 

MRT 

AHP 

HG
### §2536. Reports on life extension programs

#### (a) Reports required

Before proceeding beyond phase 6.2 activities with respect to any life extension program, the Nuclear Weapons Council shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on such phase 6.2 activities, including—

(1) an assessment of the life extension options considered for the phase 6.2 activities, including whether the subsystems and components in each option are considered to be a refurbishment, reuse, or replacement of such subsystem or component; and

(2) an assessment of the option selected for the phase 6.2 activities, including—

(A) whether the subsystems and components will be refurbished, reused, or replaced; and

(B) the advantages and disadvantages of refurbishment, reuse, and replacement for each such subsystem and component.

#### (b) Phase 6.2 activities defined

In this section, the term "phase 6.2 activities" means, with respect to a life extension program, the phase 6.2 feasibility study and option down-select.

(Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLII, §4216, as added Pub. L. 112–239, div. C, title XXXI, §3141(a), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 2193; amended Pub. L. 113–66, div. C, title XXXI, §3146(a)(2)(B), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 1072; Pub. L. 116–92, div. C, title XXXI, §3139(b)(4)(A), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1962.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2019—Pub. L. 116–92 substituted "life" for "lifetime" in section catchline and wherever appearing in text.

2013—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 113–66 struck out "established by section 179 of title 10" after "Nuclear Weapons Council" in introductory provisions.
### -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 42



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 10/09 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 09 Oct 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
Exhibit 11.1

                         Triangle Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
                          (A Development Stage Company)
                    Computation of Net Loss Per Common Share
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                 Three Months        Six Months          Three Months        Six Months
                                     Ended             Ended                 Ended              Ended
                                 June 30, 1998      June 30, 1998     June 30, 1997 (1)   June 30, 1997 (1)
                                 -------------      -------------     -----------------   -----------------
<S>                            <C>                 <C>                 <C>                 <C>              
Historical weighted average
  shares outstanding .......             23,425              21,725              18,135              17,859
                               ----------------    ----------------    ----------------    ----------------
Shares used in computing net
  loss per common share ....             23,425              21,725              18,135              17,859
                               ================    ================    ================    ================

Net Loss ...................   $       (14,256)    $        (30,664)   $         (5,617)   $         (9,161)
                               ================    ================    ================    ================

Basic and diluted net loss
  per common share .........   $          (0.61)   $          (1.41)   $          (0.31)   $          (0.51)
                               ================    ================    ================    ================
</TABLE>

----------
(1)   The weighted average shares outstanding used in the calculation of net
      loss per common share have been restated to reflect the adoption of
      Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings Per Share"
      and its interpretation by Securities and Exchange Staff Accounting
      Bulletin No. 98.
|                                  |
|----------------------------------|
|                                  |  |  |  |  |
| Signature                        |   | Title |   | Date |
|                             |   |   |   |   |
| /s/   TROY A. CLARKE        |   | President andChief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer) |   | December 16, 2014 |
| Troy A. Clarke                   |   |   |   |
|                             |   |   |   |   |
| /s/   WALTER G. BORST       |   | Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |   | December 16, 2014 |
| Walter G. Borst                  |   |   |   |
|                             |   |   |   |   |
| /s/   SAMARA A. STRYCKER    |   | Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) |   | December 16, 2014 |
| Samara A. Strycker               |   |   |   |
|                             |   |   |   |   |
| /s/   JOHN D. CORRENTI      |   | Director |   | December 16, 2014 |
| John D. Correnti                 |   |   |   |   |
|                             |   |   |   |   |
| /s/   MICHAEL N. HAMMES     |   | Director |   | December 16, 2014 |
| Michael N. Hammes                |   |   |   |   |
|                             |   |   |   |   |
| /s/   VINCENT J. INTRIERI   |   | Director |   | December 16, 2014 |
| Vincent J. Intrieri              |   |   |   |   |
|                             |   |   |   |   |
| /s/   JAMES H. KEYES        |   | Director |   | December 16, 2014 |
| James H. Keyes                   |   |   |   |   |
|                             |   |   |   |   |
| /s/   STANLEY A. MCCHRYSTAL |   | Director |   | December 16, 2014 |
| Stanley A. McChrystal            |   |   |   |   |
|                             |   |   |   |   |
| /s/   SAMUEL J. MERKSAMER   |   | Director |   | December 16, 2014 |
| Samuel J. Merksamer              |   |   |   |   |
|                             |   |   |   |   |
| /s/   MARK H. RACHESKY      |   | Director |   | December 16, 2014 |
| Mark H. Rachesky                 |   |   |   |   |
|                             |   |   |   |   |
| /s/   DENNIS D. WILLIAMS    |   | Director |   | December 16, 2014 |
| Dennis D. Williams               |   |   |   |   |
|                             |   |   |   |   |
| /s/   MICHAEL F. SIRIGNANO       |   | Director |   | December 16, 2014 |
| Michael F. Sirignano             |   |   |   |   |
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                       SECTION 906 OF THE
                   SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In  connection with the Quarterly Report of  Dionics,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended  June  30,
2004,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  (the
"Report"),  the  undersigned certifies,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley  Act  of 2002, to the best of the undersigned's  knowledge,
that:

      (1)   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements  of
Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of  1934;
and

       (2)   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 16, 2004         By: /s/ Bernard Kravitz
                                   Bernard Kravitz,
                                   President  and Chief Executive
                                   Officer (Principal Executive
                                   Officer)


Dated: August 16, 2004         By: /s/ Bernard Kravitz
                                   Bernard Kravitz,
                                   Principal Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 130 (Monday, July 8, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40737-40738]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16329]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9831-4; EPA-HQ-OEI-2012-0806]

Notification of Deletion of System of Records; Office of Criminal 
Enforcement, Forensics & Training, National Enforcement Investigations 
Center, Master Tracking System (EPA-46)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency is removing the Master 
Tracking System (EPA-46), published in the Federal Register on October 
1, 2011,

[[Page 40738]]

from its inventory of Privacy Act systems. A personal identifier is no 
longer used to retrieve the information in the system.

DATES: This notice is effective immediately upon publication in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Valerie James, Infrastructure and 
Project Support Branch Chief, National Enforcement Investigations 
Center, Office of Criminal Enforcement, Forensics & Training at (303) 
462-9051 or Tammy Stein, Infrastructure Section Chief, National 
Enforcement Investigations Center, Office of Criminal Enforcement, 
Forensics & Training at (303) 462-9054, P.O. Box 25227, Denver Federal 
Center, 6th and Kipling, Building 25, Denver, CO 80225.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

General Information

    The Master Tracking System, EPA-46, contains information about 
individuals who are the subject of investigations conducted by the EPA 
Office of Criminal Enforcement. The investigative reports concern 
violations of federal environmental statutes and regulations and 
include information provided by individuals related to the subject 
violation. Since personal identifiers are no longer used to retrieve 
the information in this system, the Agency is deleting the Master 
Tracking System from its inventory of Privacy Act systems.

How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

    EPA established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA-
HQ-OEI-2012-0806. Copies of the docket materials are available at 
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), 
EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The 
EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone 
number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744. The telephone 
number for the OEI Docket Center is (202) 566-1752.

How can I get electronic access to this document?

    You may access this Federal Register document electronically under 
the ``Federal Register'' listings at www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: June 14, 2013.
Malcolm D. Jackson,
Assistant Administrator and Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-16329 Filed 7-5-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
#### In the Matter of Bernard Tompkins, Petitioner, against Paul Mercier, Respondent.

The petition, made directly and initially to this court, seeks the removal of Paul Mercier from the office of Superintendent of Highways of the Town of Esopus, Ulster County, New York, under the authority of section 36 of the Public Officers Law. The pertinent provisions of that section are: “ Any town * * * officer * * '* may be removed from office by the supreme court for any misconduct, maladministration, malfeasance or malversation in office. An application for such removal may be made by any citizen resident of such town 6 * * or by the district attorney of the county in which such town * * * is located, and shall be made to the appellate division of the supreme court held within the judicial department embracing such town ”. The petitioner is Bernard Tompkins, Special Assistant Attorney-General of the State of New York, in charge of an investigation in Ulster County, by appointment pursuant to subdivision 2 of section 63 of the Executive Law. The petition does not allege that he is a *“*citizen resident of such town ” or that he is the District Attorney of the county. Concededly he is neither. Mercier moves to dismiss the petition on points of law, one of which is that the petitioner is not a person authorized by law to initiate the proceeding. With that point we are constrained to agree. On its face the petition alleges adequate grounds for removal, and we do not agree that criminal prosecution is the exclusive procedure. We must dismiss the petition, not for lack of meritorious allegations contained therein, but for the lack of power and authority granted by the Legislature to this court. The court has no power whatever to remove a town officer except as it is expressly conferred by the Legislature, and iñ accordance with the conditions imposed. Section 36 of the Public Officers Law authorizes us to entertain such an application only when it is made by a citizen resident of the town or the District Attorney of the county. Without an application from someone within those two categories we are completely without authority to act. Petitioner urges that he supersedes the District Attorney and has all the power of the District Attorney. That is undoubtedly true as far as *“*criminal actions and proceedings” are concerned. (Executive Law, § 63, subd. 2.) But a proceeding to remove a town officer under section 36 of the Public Officers Law is a civil proceeding, finding no authority of removal outside the terms of that specific section. Nowhere do we find any authority for a Grand Jury or Special Assistant Attorney-General to make the application, and hence we find no authority for this court to pass upon the merits of the petition unless and until a person authorized by the Legislature makes the application. Petition dismissed, without costs. Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.