alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
➊ ล้างมือของคุณ ➋ ตรวจสอบอุปกรณ์ช่วยหายใจ

ล้างมือของคุณด้วยสบู่และน้ํา หรือแอลกอฮอล์ทํา ความสะอาดมือที่

มีแอลกอฮอล์อย่างน้อย 60%

ตรวจสอบอุปกรณ์ช่วยหายใจว่าเสียหายหรือไม่ 

หากพบว่าเสียหายหรือเปียกชื้น อย่าใช้อุปกรณ์ช่วยหายใจนี้

➌ ใส่อุปกรณ์ช่วยหายใจ

ถืออุปกรณ์ช่วยหายใจไว้ในอุ้งมือ

ของคุณ โดยให้ส่วนที่คลุมจมูกอยู่

ที่ปลายนิ้วของคุณ และให้สายรัด

ห้อยอยู่ข้างใต้มือของคุณ

คลุมปากและจมูกของ

คุณด้วยอุปกรณ์ช่วยหายใจ 

และต้องมั่นใจว่าไม่มีช่องว่าง 

(ตัวอย่างเช่น หนวดหรือเครา ผม 

และแว่นตา) อยู่ระหว่างหน้าของ

คุณกับอุปกรณ์ช่วยหายใจ

สวมสายรัดเหนือศีรษะ

ของคุณและให้อยู่ที่ด้าน

หลังส่วนบนของศีรษะของคุณ 

หากคุณมีสายรัดสองเส้น 

สวมสายรัดเส้นล่างรอบคอ

ของคุณและให้อยู่ข้างใต้หูของคุณ 

อย่าให้สายรัดไขว้กัน

หากอุปกรณ์ช่วยหายใจของคุณ

มีคลิปโลหะสํา หรับจมูก ใช้ปลาย

นิ้วจากมือทั้งสองข้างของคุณ

กดลงบริเวณจมูกเพื่อให้ได้รูป

ร่างตามจมูกของคุณ

➍ ปรับอุปกรณ์ช่วยหายใจ ➎ สวมใส่อุปกรณ์ช่วยหายใจ

วางมือทั้งสองข้างเหนือ

อุปกรณ์ช่วยหายใจ หายใจเข้าอย่าง

รวดเร็วแล้วหายใจออก หากคุณ

รู้สึกว่ามีการรั่วจากบริเวณจมูก 

ให้ปรับส่วนที่คลุมจมูกใหม่ หาก

มีการรั่วจากบริเวณขอบของ

อุปกรณ์ช่วยหายใจ ให้ปรับสายรัดใหม่

ทํา ซ้ํา จนกระทั่งอุปกรณ์แนบสนิทดี 

หากอุปกรณ์ไม่แนบสนิท ให้ลอง

เปลี่ยนอุปกรณ์ช่วยหายใจชิ้นอื่น

หลีกเลี่ยงการสัมผัสกับ

อุปกรณ์ช่วยหายใจในขณะที่ใช้

อุปกรณ์ หากคุณสัมผัสกับอุปกรณ์ 

ให้ล้างมือของคุณ

➏ ถอดอุปกรณ์ช่วยหายใจออก ➐ ทิ้งอุปกรณ์ช่วยหายใจ

ล้างมือของคุณ ถอดอุปกรณ์ช่วยหายใจออกจาก

ด้านหลัง อย่าแตะด้านหน้า

หากไม่จํา เป็นต้องนํา อุปกรณ์ช่วยหายใจกลับมาใช้ใหม่เนื่องจาก

ความขาดแคลนอุปกรณ์ ให้ทิ้งอุปกรณ์ช่วยหายใจในถังขยะที่มีฝาปิด 

ล้างมือของคุณ

เจ็ดขั้นตอนในการสวมใส่อุปกรณ์ช่วยหายใจในที่

ทํา งานอย่างถูกต้อง

การปฏิบัติตามขั้นตอนง่ายๆ เหล่านี้จะช่วยให้คุณใส่และถอดอุปกรณ์ช่วยหายใจของคุณ

ได้อย่างเหมาะสม และทํา ให้คุณและบุคคลอื่นปลอดภัย

1-800-321-OSHA (6742)

TTY 1-877-889-5627

www.osha.gov

สํา หรับข้อมูลเพิ่มเติม 

โปรดดูวิดีโอสั้น "การใส่

และการถอดอุปกรณ์

ช่วยหายใจ" 

หมายเหตุ: หากคุณนํา

อุปกรณ์ช่วยหายใจของ

คุณกลับมาใช้ซ้ํา ให้สวมถุง

มือเมื่อทํา การตรวจสอบ

และใส่อุปกรณ์ช่วยหายใจ 

หลีกเลี่ยงการสัมผัสกับใบ

หน้าของคุณ (รวมถึง ตา 

จมูก และปากของคุณ) 

ในระหว่างกระบวนการ

คณะกรรมการบริหาร

งานความปลอดภัยและ

อาชีวอนามัย

OSHA 4042-06 2020 — Seven Steps to Correctly Wear a Respirator at Work (Thai)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM VERITAS DGC
INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JANUARY, 31, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                          15,523
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  105,645
<ALLOWANCES>                                       505
<INVENTORY>                                      2,126
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               129,858
<PP&E>                                         197,682
<DEPRECIATION>                                 102,668
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 260,458
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,058
<BONDS>                                         75,186
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           161
<OTHER-SE>                                     120,924
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   260,458
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               167,096
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  126,302
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,775
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,230
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,789
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,919
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,675
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .61
        

</TABLE>
#### § 57.19096 Familiarity with signal code.

Any person responsible for receiving or giving signals for cages, skips, and mantrips when persons or materials are being transported shall be familiar with the posted signaling code.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNASA Boeing 737 Aircraft Test Results from 1996 Joint Winter Runway Friction Measurement ProgramA description of the joint test program objectives and scope is given together with the performance capability of the NASA Langley B-737 instrumented aircraft. The B-737 test run matrix conducted during the first 8 months of this 5-year program is discussed with a description of the different runway conditions evaluated. Some preliminary test results are discussed concerning the Electronic Recording Decelerometer (ERD) readings and a comparison of B-737 aircraft braking performance for different winter runway conditions. Detailed aircraft parameter time history records, analysis of ground vehicle friction measurements and harmonization with aircraft braking performance, assessment of induced aircraft contaminant drag, and evaluation of the effects of other factors on aircraft/ground vehicle friction performance will be documented in a NASA Technical Report which is being prepared for publication next year.Document ID19970000907Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsYager, Thomas J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1996Subject CategoryResearch And Support Facilities (Air)Report/Patent NumberNASA-TM-110482NAS 1.15:110482Meeting InformationMeeting: International Meeting on Aircraft Performance on Contaminated Runways (IMAPCR ''96)Location: Montreal, QuebecCountry: CanadaStart Date: October 22, 1996End Date: October 23, 1996Accession Number97N10813Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970000907.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §2565. Authority to conduct program relating to fissile materials

The Secretary of Energy may conduct programs designed to improve the protection, control, and accountability of fissile materials in Russia.

(Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLIII, §4305, formerly Pub. L. 104–106, div. C, title XXXI, §3131, Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 617; Pub. L. 107–314, div. C, title XXXI, §3152, Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2738; renumbered Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLIII, §4305, by Pub. L. 108–136, div. C, title XXXI, §3141(f)(6), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1763.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly set out as a note under section 5952 of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse, prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 108–136.

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–314, §3152, struck out subsec. (a) designation and heading "Authority" and subsec. (b) heading and text. Prior to amendment, subsec. (b) related to semi-annual reports on obligations of funds.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Completion of Material Protection, Control, and Accounting Activities in the Russian Federation

Pub. L. 113–291, div. C, title XXXI, §3122(b), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3894, provided that:

"(1) In general.—Except as provided in paragraph (2) or specifically authorized by Congress, international material protection, control, and accounting activities in the Russian Federation shall be completed not later than fiscal year 2018.

"(2) Exception.—The limitation in paragraph (1) shall not apply to international material protection, control, and accounting activities in the Russian Federation associated with the Agreement Concerning the Management and Disposition of Plutonium Designated as No Longer Required for Defense Purposes and Related Cooperation, signed at Moscow and Washington August 29 and September 1, 2000, and entered into force July 13, 2011 (TIAS 11–713.1), between the United States and the Russian Federation."
(April 28, 1978)

#### In the Matter of Theodore Rosenberg, an Attorney and Counselor at Law, Respondent. Joint Bar Association Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Petitioner.

Motion by petitioner to strike the respondent Theodore Rosenberg’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law on the ground that respondent has been disbarred by virtue of a felony conviction. Motion granted. The respondent, admitted to practice before the Bar by this court on June 25, 1952, was convicted of a felony (violation of US Code, tit 26, §§ 7201, 7206, subd [1]) knowingly and willfully attempting to evade and defeat a large part of the income tax due and owing by him to the United States of America for the calendar year 1971 by preparing and causing to be prepared a false and fraudulent income tax return, in the United States District Court, for the Eastern District of New York on February 3, 1978. The clerk of this court is directed to strike his name from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law *1066forthwith by reason of said conviction *(Matter of Chu,*42 NY2d 490). Hopkins, J. P., Latham, Rabin, Gulotta and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 22, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 0016 6

- CV

IN RE THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Luz Elena D. C hapa, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Following a March 15, 2022 hearing, the trial court signed an order entitled “ Order

Following Hearing Regarding Placement ” (the “March 15 o rder”)

.

On March 21, 2022, the R elator filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the

March 15 order. Relator also filed a motion asking this c ourt to stay: the March 15 order, “ any

new or revised orders to have the same effec t ,” and the “ trial court from taking punitive and

coercive action to enforce the provisions of that order, including but not limited to incarceration

and monetary sanctions .”

Given the time constraints

, the R elator has not been able to obtain a transcrip t of the

hearing . We ORDER R elator to file, no later than April 1, 2022 , a transcript of the March 15,

2022 hearing.

We GRANT the motion for temporary emergency relief in part as follows :

1. The following decretal paragraph in the trial court’s “Order Following

Hearing Regarding Placement” rendered on March 15, 2022, and signed on March 18,

2022, is STAYED pending further order of this c ourt :

2.1 IT IS ORDERED that a child specific contract shall be entered on or

before March 25, 2022 that call s for payment up to the amount of $800 per

day for placement of E.R.G.

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2020

- PA

- 0 1204 , styled In The Interest of E.R.G ., A Child , pending in the

37th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

. T he Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez signed the order at issue in this

proceeding.2. A ny further proceedings regarding the creation of contracts or the payment

of funds regarding the child’s placement and services are STAYED pending further order

of this c ourt.

3. Any contempt proceedings, sanctions, or any enforcement of the “ Order

Following Hearing Regarding Placement ” are STAYED pending further order of this

c ourt.

It is so ORDERED on March 22, 2022

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Michael A. Cruz

, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 11.1

                     BRILLIANT DIGITAL ENTERTAINMENT, INC.

                COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
                                       --------------------------------------
                                          1997                        1996
                                       ----------                 -----------
<S>                                    <C>                        <C>
Weighted average shares
    outstanding                             7,200                       4,473
Common Stock equivalents:
    Stock options granted                                                  37
    Warrants granted                                                       47
                                       ----------                 -----------


Weighted average number of shares used in
    computing net income(loss) per share    7,200                       4,557
                                       ==========                 ===========
  Net income (loss)                    $   (1,759)                $       156
                                       ==========                 ===========
  Net income (loss) per
    common shares                      $    (0.24)                $      0.03
                                       ==========                 ===========

PAGE 22
<PAGE>

</TABLE>
IN THE SUP ERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DE LAWARE IN AND FOR KENT COUNTY

CHRISTOPHER A. CASE, : : C.A. No: K13C-12-020 TBD Plaintiff, : : v. : : AARON R. TAYLOR, : : Defenda nt. :

ORDER In this matter, Plaintiff

has m oved to have

preclude d any “ expert opin ion” testim ony by

the investi gating off

icer. D efendant objects, not to the co ncept, but only to the p hraseolo gy of the prop osed Order. Hence, Officer Jam es P. Pi azza wi ll not be per mitte d to offer

opinion or “ca usation conc lusory ” testim ony. H e will of

course, be perm

itted to tes tify, as any lay witness, to a ll thing s he observ ed or did. SO ORDERED this 6 th day of January , 2015.

/s/ Rober

t B. Youn g J.
RBY /l mc oc: Prothonotary cc: Gary

W. A ber, E sq. Mary E. Sherlock, Esq. Opinion Di stribution File
Exhibit 32.1



906 Certification



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of DreamWorks Animation
SKG, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the
Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                           
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 10, 2006 |  | /s/    JEFFREY KATZENBERG                 
|                      |  | Jeffrey Katzenberg Chief Executive Officer
|                      | 
|Dated: March 10, 2006 |  | /s/    KRISTINA M. LESLIE                 
|                      |  | Kristina M. Leslie Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7573

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DERRICK THOMAS, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-93-168, CA-97-520) Submitted: January 19, 1999 Decided: February 17, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Derrick Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Alexander Weinman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Derrick Thomas seeks to appeal the district court’s order affirming the magistrate judge’s denial of his motion to amend and judgment adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). Wehave reviewed the record and the district court’s order and judgment and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Thomas , Nos. CR-93-168; CA-97-520 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 25, 1997; Oct. 9, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
HPMSVtypeID yearID HPMSBaseYearVMT baseYearOffNetVMT

10 2009 34329345 0

20 2009 5099334700 0

30 2009 3132758135 0

40 2009 16905705 0

50 2009 194729690 0

60 2009 382301000 0
#### § 57.12017 Work on power circuits.

Power circuits shall be deenergized before work is done on such circuits unless hot-line tools are used. Suitable warning signs shall be posted by the individuals who are to do the work. Switches shall be locked out or other measures taken which shall prevent the power circuits from being energized without the knowledge of the individuals working on them. Such locks, signs, or preventive devices shall be removed only by the person who installed them or by authorized personnel.
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 99.1
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Intervoice, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended February 28, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David W.
Brandenburg, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Date: May 29, 2003
                                            /s/ David W. Brandenburg
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            David W. Brandenburg
                                            Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
§ 7.404 Technical requirements. ( a ) Electric cables and splices shall be flame resistant when tested in accordance with § 7.407.
( b ) Signaling cables shall be flame resistant when tested in accordance with § 7.408.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 244 (Friday, December 18, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 82441-82442]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27883]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institute of Standards and Technology


Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment 
Request; Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program Application 
Cover Sheet

    The Department of Commerce will submit the following information 
collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for 
review and clearance in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 
1995, on or after the date of publication of this notice. We invite the 
general public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed, and 
continuing information collections, which helps us assess the impact of 
our information collection requirements and minimize

[[Page 82442]]

the public's reporting burden. Public comments were previously 
requested via the Federal Register on September 25, 2020 during a 60-
day comment period. This notice allows for an additional 30 days for 
public comments.
    Agency: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
    Title: Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program 
Application Cover Sheet.
    OMB Control Number 0693-0072.
    Form Number(s): None.
    Type of Request: Revision and extension of a current information 
collection.
    Number of Respondents: 100.
    Average Hours per Response: 30 minutes.
    Burden Hours: 50 hours.
    Needs and Uses: The information collected in the Cover Sheet 
provides identifying information and demographic data for use in NIST's 
annual report to the SBA on the program. The technical abstract is used 
in prevention of fraud, waste, and abuse by providing a method to 
compare similar applications to other agency SBIR programs. The 
abstract and potential commercial applications of successful applicants 
are posted on the agency website.
    Affected Public: Applicants to the NIST SBIR Program.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    Legal Authority:
    This information collection request may be viewed at 
www.reginfo.gov. Follow the instructions to view the Department of 
Commerce collections currently under review by OMB.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be submitted within 30 days of the publication of 
this notice on the following website www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. 
Find this particular information collection by selecting ``Currently 
under 30-day Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search 
function and entering either the title of the collection or the OMB 
Control Number 0693-0072.

Sheleen Dumas,
Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information 
Officer, Commerce Department.
[FR Doc. 2020-27883 Filed 12-17-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-13-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cogo Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Jeffrey Kang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |        |  |                        
|------------------ |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: May 7, 2010 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Jeffrey Kang       
|                   |  | Name:  |  | Jeffrey Kang           
|                   |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer