alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 550.232 What actions will BOEM take after the EP is deemed submitted? ( a ) *State and CZMA consistency reviews.* Within 2 working days after deeming your EP submitted under § 550.231, the Regional Supervisor will use receipted mail or alternative method to send a public information copy of the EP and its accompanying information to the following: ( 1 ) *The Governor of each affected State.* The Governor has 21 calendar days after receiving your deemed-submitted EP to submit comments. The Regional Supervisor will not consider comments received after the deadline.
( 2 ) *The CZMA agency of each affected State.* The CZMA consistency review period under section 307(c)(3)(B)(ii) of the CZMA (16 U.S.C. 1456(c)(3)(B)(ii)) and 15 CFR 930.78 begins when the State's CZMA agency receives a copy of your deemed-submitted EP, consistency certification, and required necessary data and information (see 15 CFR 930.77(a)(1)).
( b ) *BOEM compliance review.* The Regional Supervisor will review the exploration activities described in your proposed EP to ensure that they conform to the performance standards in § 550.202.
( c ) *BOEM environmental impact evaluation.* The Regional Supervisor will evaluate the environmental impacts of the activities described in your proposed EP and prepare environmental documentation under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.*) and the implementing regulations (40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508).
( d ) *Amendments.* During the review of your proposed EP, the Regional Supervisor may require you, or you may elect, to change your EP. If you elect to amend your EP, the Regional Supervisor may determine that your EP, as amended, is subject to the requirements of § 550.231.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                       4,190,490
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               26,040,332
<ALLOWANCES>                                   368,005
<INVENTORY>                                  9,343,338
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      49,084,636
<DEPRECIATION>                              16,736,766
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              87,297,825
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,618,154
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,726
<OTHER-SE>                                  56,620,792
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                87,297,825
<SALES>                                    102,307,713
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           102,307,713
<CGS>                                       52,854,519
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               52,854,519
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               291,491
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              81,593
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,643,536)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (2,503,690)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,139,846)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,139,846)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.17)


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**JEREMY MICHAEL BANEY,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 39 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 6th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowa nce of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.**
### §2534. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–66, div. C, title XXXI, §3146(c)(8)(A), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 1075

Section, Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLII, §4214, as added Pub. L. 109–364, div. C, title XXXI, §3111(a), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2502; amended Pub. L. 112–239, div. C, title XXXI, §3131(g)(1), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 2181, related to plan for transformation of National Nuclear Security Administration nuclear security enterprise.
KPMG LLP
4200 Wells Fargo Center
90 South Seventh Street
Minneapolis, MN  55402




                          Independent Auditors' Consent


The Board of Directors of Allianz Life  Insurance  Company of North  America and
Policy Owners of Allianz Life Variable Account A:


We consent to the use of our report,  dated  March 30, 2001 on the financial
statements of Allianz Life Variable  Account A and our report dated January 16,
2001, on the consolidated financial statements of Allianz Life Insurance Company
of North America and  subsidiaries  included  herein and to the reference to our
Firm under the heading "EXPERTS".

Our report dated January 16, 2001 on the  consolidated  financial  statements of
Allianz Life  Insurance  Company of North America and  subsidiaries  refers to a
change in the  method of  calculating  deferred  acquisition  costs  and future
benefit reserves for two-tiered annuities.


                                      /s/ KPMG LLP
                                      KPMG LLP




Minneapolis, Minnesota
April 23, 2001
1-866-487-9243

TTY: 1-877-889-5627

www.dol.gov/whd

WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

WH1462 REV 07/16

PROHIBITIONS Employers are generally prohibited from requiring or requesting 

any employee or job applicant to take a lie detector test, and from 

discharging, disciplining, or discriminating against an employee or 

prospective employee for refusing to take a test or for exercising other 

rights under the Act. 

EXEMPTIONS Federal, State and local governments are not affected by the law. Also, 

the law does not apply to tests given by the Federal Government to 

certain private individuals engaged in national security-related activities.

The Act permits polygraph (a kind of lie detector) tests to be administered 

in the private sector, subject to restrictions, to certain prospective 

employees of security service firms (armored car, alarm, and guard), and 

of pharmaceutical manufacturers, distributors and dispensers.

The Act also permits polygraph testing, subject to restrictions, of certain 

employees of private firms who are reasonably suspected of involvement 

in a workplace incident (theft, embezzlement, etc.) that resulted in 

economic loss to the employer.

The law does not preempt any provision of any State or local law or any 

collective bargaining agreement which is more restrictive with respect to 

lie detector tests.

EXAMINEE 

RIGHTS

Where polygraph tests are permitted, they are subject to numerous strict 

standards concerning the conduct and length of the test. Examinees 

have a number of specific rights, including the right to a written notice 

before testing, the right to refuse or discontinue a test, and the right not 

to have test results disclosed to unauthorized persons.

ENFORCEMENT The Secretary of Labor may bring court actions to restrain violations and 

assess civil penalties against violators. Employees or job applicants may 

also bring their own court actions.

EMPLOYEE RIGHTS 

EMPLOYEE POLYGRAPH PROTECTION ACT

The Employee Polygraph Protection Act 

prohibits most private employers from using 

lie detector tests either for pre-employment 

screening or during the course of employment.

THE LAW REQUIRES EMPLOYERS TO DISPLAY THIS POSTER 

WHERE EMPLOYEES AND JOB APPLICANTS CAN READILY SEE IT.
#### Frank Oschotz, appellee, v. Harold J. Coleman et al., appellants.

Gen. No. 28,333.

Foreclosure of trust deed. Cross-bill dismissed. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Denis E. Sullivan, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1923.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

Opinion filed December 10, 1923.

L. A. Sherwin, for appellants. D. J. Normoyle, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Matehett

delivered the opinion of the court.
§ 580.61 Which of my costs will not be reimbursed? ( a ) When you request reimbursement, you must identify reproduction and processing costs separately from acquisition costs.
( b ) We will not reimburse you or a third party for data acquisition costs or for the costs of analyzing or processing geological information or interpreting geological or geophysical information.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
ART. 5 FDS FOR YEAR 10-K
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           2,988
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,986
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          46,553
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,107
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,169
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         22,682
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,191
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,169
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,688
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,035
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,052
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,979
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (906)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (906)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (906)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.14)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                            TRIDENT ROWAN GROUP INC.
                         CALCULATION OF LOSS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<S>                                                     <C>         <C>
CALCULATION OF LOSS PER SHARE                            LIRE m.     US$'000(1)
3 MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997

Loss for the 3 months ended March 31, 1997.............    (2,564)      (1,528)
Average number of shares outstanding*..................  3,902,540    3,902,540
Loss per share.........................................      (657)       (0.39)
                                                         ---------    ---------
                                                         ---------    ---------

* There were no share movements in the period

CALCULATION OF LOSS PER SHARE                            LIRE M.
3 MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1996

Loss for the 3 months ended March 31, 1996.............    (3,404)
Average number of shares outstanding*..................  4,712,865
Loss per share.........................................      (722)
                                                         ---------
                                                         ---------

* There were no share movements in the period
</TABLE>


------------------------

(1)  Converted to US$ solely for the convenience of the reader at $1:Lit. 1,677,
     the approximate exchange rate as at March 1997.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9663 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require the Secretary of Defense 

to disclose standards for implementation of the modular open system 

approaches for contracts of the Department of Defense, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2024 

Ms. PORTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require the Secretary of Defense to disclose standards for implementation of the modular open system approaches for contracts 

of the Department of Defense, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Open-Source Stand5 ards Reporting Act of 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9663 IH

1 SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE OF STANDARDS FOR IMPLEMENTA2 TION OF THE MODULAR OPEN SYSTEM AP3 PROACHES FOR CONTRACTS OF THE DE4 PARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 

5 Section 4401 of title 10, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) by redesignating subsection (b) and sub8 section (c); and 

9 (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the fol10 lowing: 

11 ‘‘(b) DISCLOSURE REQUIRED.—(1) Not later than 

12 one year after the date of the enactment of this subsection, 

13 the Secretary of Defense shall make publicly available any 

14 standards for implementation of the modular open system 

15 approaches for contracts, unless either the Secretary or 

16 the service acquisition executive with respect to a specific 

17 contract determines not disclose such standards. 

18 ‘‘(2) For each determination not to disclose such 

19 standards made under paragraph (1), the Secretary or the 

20 service acquisition executive, as applicable, shall submit to 

21 Congress a report that includes a justification for such 

22 determination.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### § 56.12037 Fuses in high-potential circuits.

Fuse tongs or hot line tools shall be used when fuses are removed or replaced in high-potential circuits.
### §2357g. Reporting and consultation

#### (a) Presidential report

Not later than 120 days after each inauguration of a President, the President shall submit a report to the Congress on his general and specific nonproliferation and threat reduction objectives and how the efforts of executive branch agencies will be coordinated most effectively, pursuant to section 2357b of this title, to achieve those objectives.

#### (b) Consultation

The President should consult with and brief, from time to time, the appropriate committees of Congress regarding the efficacy of the coordination mechanism established pursuant to section 2357b of this title in achieving its stated objectives.

(Pub. L. 107–228, div. B, title XIII, §1339, Sept. 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 1451.)
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 12-13
                           THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Nine
                                                   Months               Year Ended December 31
                                                   Ended                ----------------------
                                                  9/30/98          1997          1996         1995
                                                  -------          ----          ----         ----
                                                                 (Millions, except for ratio)
<S>                                              <C>              <C>           <C>          <C>  
Net income                                       $    318       $   417         $ 328        $ 434
                                                 --------       -------         -----        -----
Taxes based on income:
    Current income taxes                              216           308           224          221
    Deferred taxes - net                               24            (6)           16           79
    Investment tax credit adjustments - net           (11)          (14)          (15)         (17)
    Municipal and state                                 3             4             3            3
                                                 --------       -------         -----        -----
        Total taxes based on income                   232           292           228          286
                                                 --------       -------         -----        -----
Fixed charges:
    Interest on long-term debt                        192           262           275          275
    Amortization of debt discount, premium
        and expense                                     8            11            12           11
    Other interest                                      8             9             4           10
    Interest factor of rents                           26            34            34           29
                                                 --------       -------         -----      -------
        Total fixed charges                           234           316           325          325
                                                 --------       -------         -----      -------  
Earnings before taxes based on income
                                                 
    and fixed charges                            $    784       $ 1,025         $ 881      $ 1,045
                                                 ========       =======         =====      =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                   3.35          3.24          2.71         3.21
</TABLE>
§ 556.711 What is the effect of a record title holder's sublease of operating rights on the record title holder's liability? ( a ) A record title holder who subleases operating rights remains liable for all obligations of the lease, including those obligations accruing after BOEM's approval of the sublease, subject to § 556.604(e) and (f).
( b ) Neither the sublease of operating rights, nor subsequent assignment of those rights by the original sublessee, nor by any subsequent assignee of the operating rights, alters in any manner the liability of the record title holder for nonmonetary obligations.
( c ) Upon approval of the sublease of the operating rights, the sublessee and subsequent assignees of the operating rights become primarily liable for monetary obligations, but the record title holder remains secondarily liable for them, as prescribed in 30 U.S.C. 1712(a) and § 556.604(f)(2).
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 229 (Friday, November 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 70914]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28044]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority No. 378]

Delegation of the Authority To Make Determinations Under 22 
U.S.C. 2656f(d) From the Secretary of State to the Under Secretary for 
Management

    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of State by the 
State Department Basic Authorities Act (22 U.S.C. 2651a) and Section 
140 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, 1988 and 1989 (Pub. L. 
100-204), as amended (22 U.S.C. 2656f), I hereby delegate to the Under 
Secretary of State for Management, to the extent consistent with law, 
the authority to determine whether an individual's death resulted from 
terrorism or an act of terrorism, for the purpose of approving the 
payment of certain death benefits under Sections 413, 415, and 416 of 
the Foreign Service Act of 1980, as amended (22 U.S.C 3973, 3975, 
3976).
    In exercising the authority delegated herein, the Under Secretary 
will consult with relevant Department of State offices and bureaus 
before making the determination that a death resulted from terrorism or 
an act of terrorism.
    Notwithstanding this Delegation of Authority, the Secretary, the 
Deputy Secretary, or the Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources 
may at any time exercise any function delegated by this delegation of 
authority.
    Any act, executive order, regulation or procedure affected by this 
delegation shall be deemed to be such act, executive order, regulation, 
or procedure as amended from time to time. The delegation of authority 
does not revoke, supersede, or otherwise affect any other delegation of 
authority to the Under Secretary for Management.
    This delegation of authority shall be published in the Federal 
Register.

John F. Kerry
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-28044 Filed 11-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-15-P
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.1607 Field rules.

When geological and engineering information in a field enables a District Manager to determine specific operating requirements, field rules may be established for drilling, well completion, or well workover on the District Manager's initiative or in response to a request from a lessee; such rules may modify the specific requirements of this subpart. After field rules have been established, operations in the field shall be conducted in accordance with such rules and other requirements of this subpart. Field rules may be amended or canceled for cause at any time upon the initiative of the District Manager or upon the request of a lessee.
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                              CERTIFICATION OF THE
                          JOINT CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                             Pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trident Rowan Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Emanuel
Arbib, Joint Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                          /s/ Emanuel M. Arbib
                                          -----------------------------
                                          Emanuel M. Arbib
                                          Joint Chief Executive Officer
                                          May 25, 2004