alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Michael J. Gaynor, Appellant, v. New York State Harness Racing Commission, Respondent.

In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, (1) to annul a determination by New York State Harness Racing Commission, which denied petitioner’s application for a license as a pari-mutuel clerk, and (2) to compel the issuance of such license to him, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 6, 1961, dismissing his petition. The dismissal was based upon the ground that petitioner, a Special Deputy Clerk of the Supreme Court, Kings County, is a public employee earning $7,500 or more per annum and, as such, is ineligible for a license under the provisions of the State Pari-Mutuel Revenue Law (L. 1940, ch. 254, as amd.; see § 63, added by L. 1954, eh. 514, as amd.). Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur. [32 Misc 2d 484.]
Second Department,

April, 1978

(April 3, 1978)

#### A & P Store Fronts, Inc., Respondent, v John Kempski, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

In an action, *inter alia,*to foreclose a mechanic’s lien and for work, labor and services, defendant John Kempski appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered May 20, 1977, which, after a nonjury trial, *inter alia,*granted a money judgment to the plaintiff. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The trial court’s determination was supported by the evidence. We note, however, that the custom-built kitchen cabinets and the air-conditioning units, not yet installed, should be included in the court-ordered foreclosure sale. Hopkins, J. P., Martuscello, Titone and Rabin, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 12

                       DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE, INC.
         STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                        (In thousands, except for ratio)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             For the Years Ended                             For the
                                      ------------------------------------------------------------------   Quarter Ended
                                         1995          1996          1997          1998          1999          3/00
                                      ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------
<S>                                   <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Earnings:
   Income before provisions for
     income taxes                     $  298,500    $  473,800    $  661,100    $  600,500    $  953,500    $  389,200

Add: Fixed Charges
      Interest expense (gross)         2,699,769     2,865,800     4,012,209     4,501,242     4,839,810     1,574,381

      Interest factor in rents            22,064        25,515        29,351        38,517        52,563        12,859
                                      ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------

      Total fixed charges              2,721,833     2,891,315     4,041,560     4,539,759     4,892,373     1,587,240

Earnings before fixed charges,
   and provision for income taxes     $3,020,333    $3,365,115    $4,702,660    $5,140,259    $5,845,873    $1,976,440
                                      ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges          1.11          1.16          1.16          1.13          1.19          1.25
                                      ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========
</TABLE>
§ 585.525 What general requirements must a financial assurance instrument meet? ( a ) Any bond or other acceptable financial assurance instrument that you provide must: ( 1 ) Be payable to BOEM upon demand; and
( 2 ) Guarantee compliance of all lessees, grant holders, operators, and payors with all terms and conditions of the lease or grant, any subsequent approvals and authorizations, and all applicable regulations.
( b ) All bonds and other forms of financial assurance must be on or in a form approved by BOEM. You may submit this on an approved form that you have reproduced or generated by use of a computer. If the document you submit omits any terms and conditions that are included on the BOEM-approved form, your bond is deemed to contain the omitted terms and conditions.
( c ) Surety bonds must be issued by an approved surety listed in the current Treasury Circular 570, as required by 31 CFR 223.16. You may obtain a copy of Circular 570 from the Treasury website at *https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/circular-570.html*.
( d ) Your surety bond cannot exceed the underwriting limit listed in the current Treasury Circular 570, except as permitted therein.
( e ) You and a qualified surety must execute your bond. When the surety is a corporation, an authorized corporate officer must sign the bond and attest to it over the corporate seal.
( f ) You may not terminate the period of liability of your bond or cancel your bond, except as provided in this subpart. Bonds must continue in full force and effect even though an event has occurred that could diminish or terminate a surety's obligation under State law.
( g ) Your surety must notify you and BOEM within 5 business days after: ( 1 ) It initiates any judicial or administrative proceeding alleging its insolvency or bankruptcy; or
( 2 ) The Treasury decertifies the surety.
Dear Mr. Parsons,

I feel the need to write you and let you know my feeling on recent gas well drilling in Tarrant County.

I live in a neighborhood on the eastside of Fort worth within a radius of 10 miles of 30 producing gas 

wells, at least!

How can this be, I live in a city, within the city limits?!!! How can we allow such things to happen? This 

would never be allowed in Europe, I’m from the UK and this seems so primitive to me that this is going

on my doorstep. I know the technology exists to NOT be drilling so close to where people actually live. I 

do notice, however, that the much richer people on west side of Fort Worth are not suffering from the 

same problem, hmmmmm, I also know that the Barnet Shale is under that area too, I guess money 

talks, or is that where all the Gas/Oil Barons live?!!!

Well, I digress................I have never suffered from so many allergies and breathing problems as I’ve 

experienced in the last 3-4 years of living in this area (15 years in total), coincidence, I think not.

The air AND water quality in Fort Worth has taken a nose dive since allowing this fracking/drilling 

process to happen, all in the name of greed. Please make companies like Chesapeake spend the money 

and move these wells out of the city limits away from communities.

The noise pollution is noticeable too, I hear it at night and I feel it through the ground at my house. Of 

course, we all know about the recent earthquakes, drilling on a fault must be really helping that 

situation, NOT!

BTW, I have not sold my mineral rights to these greedy corporations, therefore I have not sold my right 

to complain and voice my opinion.

Sincerely,

Wendy Griffiths

 

Wendy Griffiths 

to: 

Nick Parsons 

08/01/2010 12:58 PM

Show Details 

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\nparsons\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web8755.h... 8/9/2010
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with this amended Quarterly Report of Omega Commercial Finance Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jon S. Cummings IV, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | Such amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                        
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|2. | The information contained in such amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Omega Commercial Finance Corporation.



Dated: April 8, 2008



OMEGA COMMERCIAL FINANCE CORPORATION.



By: /s/ Jon S. Cummings IV

Jon S. Cummings IV

Chief Executive Officer and

Principal Financial Officer
Case 1:05-cv-05809 Document 11-1 Filed 06/01/2006 Page 1 of 7�Case 1:05-cv-05809 Document 11-1 Filed 06/01/2006 Page 2 of 7�Case 1:05-cv-05809 Document 11-1 Filed 06/01/2006 Page 3 of 7�Case 1:05-cv-05809 Document 11-1 Filed 06/01/2006 Page 4 of 7�Case 1:05-cv-05809 Document 11-1 Filed 06/01/2006 Page 5 of 7�Case 1:05-cv-05809 Document 11-1 Filed 06/01/2006 Page 6 of 7�Case 1:05-cv-05809 Document 11-1 Filed 06/01/2006 Page 7 of 7�
Yog xav paub txiv, mus saib rau 

ntawm www.osha.gov/coronavirus los 

sis hu rau 1-800-321-OSHA (6742).

1-800-321-OSHA (6742)

TTY 1-877-889-5627

OSHA 4013-04 2020 — Ten Steps All Workplaces Can Take to Reduce Risk of Exposure to Coronavirus — Hmong

www.osha.gov

Tsev Hauj Lwm Saib Xyuas 

Kev Nyab Xeeb Ntawm Kev 

Ua Hauj Lwm thiab Kev Tswj 

Xyuas Kev Noj Qab Haus Huv

Kaum Kauj Ruam Uas Txhua Lub Chaw Ua 

Hauj Lwm Tuaj Yeem Txo Txoj Kev Phom Sij 

ntawm Kev Sib Kis Tus Kab Mob Coronavirus

Txhua qhov chaw ua hauj lwm tuaj yeem pab tiv thaiv cov neeg ua hauj lawm 

kom tsis txhob raug kab mob sib kis raws li hauv qab no:

1. Pab txhawb cov neeg ua hauj 

lwm kom nyob tsev yog tias 

muaj mob.

2. Pab txhawb kev tiv thaiv ua 

pa, suav nrog kev npog los sis 

khwb qhov ncauj thaum hnoos 

thiab qhov ntswg thaum txham.

3. Npaj ib qho chaw ntxhuav tes 

los sis ib poom cawv txhuav 

tes uas muaj cawv tsawg kawg 

yog 60%.

4. Tsuas tso cai rau cov neeg 

ua hauj lwm tseem ceeb tuaj 

ntawm qhov chaw ua hauj lwm 

yog hais tias txwv tau.

5. Tsim kev ua huaj lwm kom yooj 

yim (xws li, ua hauj lwm tom 

tsev) thiab hloov sij hawm ua 

hauj lwm yooj yim (xws li, ib 

pab tuaj ib lub sij hawm txawv), 

yog tias ua tau li ntawd.

6. Txhob pub cov neeg ua huaj 

lwm siv lwm tus lub xov tooj, 

lwm tus lub rooj ua hauj lwm, 

los sis lwm tus cov cuab yeej 

ua huaj lwm thiab khoom siv 

ua hauj lwm.

7. Siv sij hawm txhua hnub los tu 

kom huv si thiab siv cov tshuaj 

tua kab mob mus so tej chaw 

ua hauj lwm, khoom siv ua hauj 

lwm, thiab ib cig.

8. Siv cov tshuaj tua tau tus 

kab mob sib kis coronavirus 

uas tau tso cai los ntawm 

Tsoom Fwv Tiv Thaiv Ib 

Puas Cig (Environmental 

Protection Agency).

9. Siv tshuaj raws li cov nqe lus 

qhia siv cov tshuaj los ntawm 

cov chaw tsim cov tshuaj.

10. Txhawb cov neeg ua hauj lwm 

kom lawd los qhia rau cov 

tswv hauv chaw ua hauj lwm 

yog tias muaj kev txhawj xeeb 

thiab raug mob.

➊

➋

➌

➍

➎

➏

➐

➑

➒

➓
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3564 

To make a technical correction to the Act providing for the designation 

of the David Berger Memorial. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2005 

Mrs. JONES of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To make a technical correction to the Act providing for 

the designation of the David Berger Memorial. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘David Berger Memo5 rial Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DAVID BERGER MEMORIAL, OHIO. 

7 Section 116 of Public Law 96–199 (16 U.S.C. 431 

8 note; 94 Stat. 71) is amended in the first sentence by 
2 

•HR 3564 IH 

1 striking ‘‘at the Jewish Community Center in Cleveland 

2 Heights, Ohio,’’ and inserting ‘‘in northeastern Ohio’’. 

Æ
### **CHAPTER 7—INTERFERENCE WITH HOMING PIGEONS OWNED BY UNITED STATES**
### Geology and ore deposits of the Mackay region, Idaho

By: J. B. Umpleby

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp97

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report** 
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### (A) Ludmilla Hunter v. Allan B. Hunter. (B) Ludmilla Hunter v. Allan B. Hunter et al.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied without prejudice, however, to a renewal thereof upon the argument or submission of the appeal. [In each action] Motion to dismiss appeal denied without prejudice, however, to a renewal thereof upon the argument or submission of the appeal. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           BD
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the condensed
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                            1,794,238
<RECEIVABLES>                                    20,970,504
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                              28,281,810
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                            34,891,468
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                              28,891,458
<PP&E>                                              662,897
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  118,012,571
<SHORT-TERM>                                      1,048,229
<PAYABLES>                                       17,094,104
<REPOS-SOLD>                                     52,086,225
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                              14,151,409
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                               17,934,843
<LONG-TERM>                                       7,358,535
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               200,000
<PREFERRED>                                         375,000
<COMMON>                                             12,781
<OTHER-SE>                                        3,929,384
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    118,012,571
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                   599,008
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                              1,899,781
<COMMISSIONS>                                       840,176
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                       963,067
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        70,452
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1,426,817
<COMPENSATION>                                    1,914,323
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     646,700
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                          407,400
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        407,400
<EPS-BASIC>                                            3.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          2.87



</TABLE>
----

| 1.   | Except as specifically provided herein, all terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Capacity Term.  The Capacity Term for the Galaxy 18 *** Transponder and the *** Capacity shall be extended for an additional *** period to ***.  The Monthly Fee for this extended Capacity Term shall remain the same.  In addition, the Capacity Term for the *** Transponder Capacity shall be reduced by ***, ending ***. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | Except as specifically set forth in this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Title: | _Senior VP and Deputy General Counsel_ | Title:  _VP Network Services and Chief Engineer_ |
|--------|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|

----
#### WORCESTER SALT CO., Respondent, v. UNITED STATES CASUALTY CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 15, 1905.)

Action by the Worcester Salt Company against the United States Casualty Company. No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-60059

Summary Calendar

LAIQ KHAN,

Petitioner

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A209 159 340

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, HO, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Laiq Khan, a native and citizen of Afghanistan, petitions for review of 

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial of his motion to terminate his 

removal proceedings for lack of jurisdiction. That same order dismissed Khan’s 

appeal of the immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of request for asylum, withholding 

of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). In this 

court, Khan argues only the jurisdictional issue, and he has thus waived any 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 11, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-60059 Document: 00515411527 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/11/2020
No. 19-60059

2

challenge to the BIA’s decision regarding his requests for asylum, withholding 

of removal, and CAT relief. See Soadjede v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 830, 833 (5th 

Cir. 2003).

Regarding jurisdiction, Khan cites Pereira v. Sessions, 138 S. Ct. 2105 

(2018), and contends that the notice to appear (NTA) which initiated his 

removal proceedings was defective, thereby depriving the immigration court of 

jurisdiction, because it did not state the date and time of his removal 

proceedings. Our court, however, has rejected this jurisdictional challenge and 

determined Pereira is limited to the context of the stop-time rule in removal 

proceedings. See Martinez-Lopez v. Barr, 943 F.3d 766, 769-70 (5th Cir. 2019);

Pierre-Paul v. Barr, 930 F.3d 684, 688-90 (5th Cir. 2019), cert. denied, 2020 WL 

1978950 (U.S. Apr. 27, 2020) (No. 19-779). Khan’s NTA was not defective 

because it detailed the nature of the removal proceedings, stated its legal basis, 

and warned about the possibility of in absentia removal; any alleged defect, 

moreover, would have been cured because Khan was issued later notices of 

hearing that included the date and time of his removal proceedings. See 

Martinez-Lopez, 943 F.3d at 770; Pierre-Paul, 930 F.3d at 690-91.

Accordingly, Khan’s petition for review is DENIED.

 Case: 19-60059 Document: 00515411527 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/11/2020
#### Alexander Izsak, Respondent, v. Zisl D. Izsak, Appellant.

Motion by respondent to dismiss appeal granted, and appeal dismissed. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Pette, JJ., concur.
#### § 57.11005 Fixed ladder anchorage and toe clearance.

Fixed ladders shall be anchored securely and installed to provide at least 3 inches of toe clearance.
§ 586.218 Who is responsible for decommissioning an OCS facility subject to an Alternate Use RUE? ( a ) The holder of an Alternate Use RUE is responsible for all decommissioning obligations that accrue following the issuance of the Alternate Use RUE and which pertain to the Alternate Use RUE.
( b ) The lessee under the lease originally issued under 30 CFR chapter V will remain responsible for decommissioning obligations that accrued before issuance of the Alternate Use RUE, as well as for decommissioning obligations that accrue following issuance of the Alternate Use RUE to the extent associated with continued activities authorized under other parts of this title.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of First Community Financial Corporation, (the
Company) for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Jody D. Graybill, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  |                              
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 14, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Jody D. Graybill
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | Jody D. Graybill, President  
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | (Principal Executive Officer)