alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


COMPANY                                                         STATE OF INCORPORATION
-------                                                         ----------------------
<S>                                                             <C>
IMPACT Center of Albany, LLC                                          Tennessee
IMPACT Center of Bayonne, LLC                                         New Jersey
IMPACT Center of Billings, LLC                                        Tennessee
IMPACT Center of Fort Smith, LLC                                      Tennessee
IMPACT Center of Glendale, LLC                                        Tennessee
IMPACT Center of Mobile, LLC                                          Tennessee
IMPACT Center of Mt. Diablo, LLC                                      Tennessee
IMPACT Center of Northridge, LLC                                      Tennessee
IMPACT Center of St. Johns, LLC                                       Tennessee
IMPACT Center of Tri-City Medical Center, LLC                         Tennessee
IMPACT Center of Washington, D.C., LLC                                Tennessee
Response Acquisition Company, Inc.                                    Tennessee
Response Oncology of Fort Lauderdale, Inc.                             Florida
Response Oncology of Miami Beach, Inc.                                 Florida
Response Oncology of St. Petersburg, Inc.                              Florida
Response Oncology of Tamarac, Inc.                                     Florida
Response Oncology of Treasure Coast, Inc.                              Florida
Response Oncology of West Fort Lauderdale, Inc.                        Florida
Response Oncology Management of South Florida, Inc.                    Florida
South Florida Response Oncology, Inc.                                  Florida

</TABLE>
#### RIPSOM, Appellant, v. IRELAND, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 24, 1905.)

Action by Edward B. Ripsom against John De Courcey Ireland.

PER CURIAM.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with costs; it appearing on the face of the order that it was granted in violation of the rule that the place of trial will not be changed from a rural county to the county of New York for the convenience of witnesses alone.
CERTIFICATION, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD & PRESIDENT

                                   Exhibit 32


DOL RESOURCES, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

We, S. Mort  Zimmerman,  Chief Executive  Officer and Fred M.  Updegraff,  Chief
Financial Officer of DOL Resources,  Inc. (the "Company"),  certify, pursuant to
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


         (i)      this  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB fully complies with the
                  requirements  of  section  13(a) or  15(d)  of the  Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

         (ii)     the information  contained in this report fairly presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of DOL Resources, Inc.



DATE: August 15, 2006

                              /s/ S. MORT ZIMMERMAN
           ----------------------------------------------------------
               S. Mort Zimmerman, Chairman of the Board, and Chief
                                Executive Officer

                              /s/ FRED M. UPDEGRAFF
           ----------------------------------------------------------
                               Fred M. Updegraff,
             Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATION*

I, William A. Owen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Outdoor Channel Holdings,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting

Date: March 31,  2005            /s/ William A. Owen
                                 ----------------------------------------
                                 WILLIAM A. OWEN, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31-32**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, David E. Meador, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 of TheDetroit Edison Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986, as amended;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.    /s/ DAVID E. MEADOR  Date: May 9, 2007 David E. Meador  Executive Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer of The DetroitEdison Company  
27
§ 57.14103 Operators' stations. ( a ) If windows are provided on operators' stations of self-propelled mobile equipment, the windows shall be made of safety glass or material with equivalent safety characteristics. The windows shall be maintained to provide visibility for safe operation.
( b ) If damaged windows obscure visibility necessary for safe operation, or create a hazard to the equipment operator, the windows shall be replaced or removed. Damaged windows shall be replaced if absence of a window would expose the equipment operator to hazardous environmental conditions which would affect the ability of the equipment operator to safely operate the equipment.
( c ) The operators' stations of self-propelled mobile equipment shall— ( 1 ) Be free of materials that may create a hazard to persons by impairing the safe operation of the equipment; and
( 2 ) Not be modified, in a manner that obscures visibility necessary for safe operation.
§ 92.350 Other Federal requirements and nondiscrimination. ( a ) The Federal requirements set forth in 24 CFR part 5, subpart A, are applicable to participants in the HOME program. The requirements of this subpart include: nondiscrimination and equal opportunity; disclosure requirements; debarred, suspended or ineligible contractors; drug-free work; and housing counseling.
( b ) The nondiscrimination requirements at section 282 of the Act are applicable. These requirements are waived in connection with the use of HOME funds on lands set aside under the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920 (42 Stat. 108).
[62 FR 28930, May 28, 1997, as amended at 81 FR 90657, Dec. 14, 2016]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tony Borden, Appellant.

[835 NYS2d 786]—

*1243Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Penny M. Wolfgang, J.), rendered August 24, 2005. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of rape in the first degree and endangering the welfare of a child.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of rape in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.35 [3]) and endangering the welfare of a child (§ 260.10 [1]), defendant contends that his statement to the police in which he admitted that he had sex with the victim was coerced and that Supreme Court therefore erred in refusing to suppress the statement. We reject defendant’s contention. The testimony at the suppression hearing establishes that defendant voluntarily came to the police station to answer questions and was permitted to return home after the two-hour interview during which he made the statement. “The circumstances of the interview were noncustodial and nonthreatening” *(People v Richardson,*202 AD2d 958, 959 [1994], *lv denied*83 NY2d 914 [1994]) and, indeed, although defendant was not in custody, he was informed of his *Miranda*rights and waived them before he made the statement. “Under the totality of the circumstances, defendant’s will was not overborne and the statement was not coerced” *(id.; see People v Mateo,*2 NY3d 383, 413-416 [2004], *cert denied*542 US 946 [2004]).

Contrary to the further contention of defendant, the court did not err in refusing to grant a mistrial based upon the People’s delay in disclosing photographs of the victim. Defendant was afforded time in which to review the photographs prior to their introduction in evidence, and defendant failed to establish that he was substantially prejudiced by the delay to warrant a mistrial *(see People v Delatorres,*34 AD3d 1343 [2006]).

Defendant failed to renew his motion to dismiss the indictment after presenting evidence and thus failed to preserve for our review his contention that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the conviction *(see People v Hines,*97 NY2d 56, 61 [2001], *rearg denied*97 NY2d 678 [2001]). Defendant also failed to preserve for our review his challenge to the court’s jury charge *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]) and, in any event, that contention is without merit. Upon our review of the record, we further conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence *(see generally People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present— Hurlbutt, J.P., Gorski, Smith, Fahey and Green, JJ.
#### §§ 585.608-585.609 [Reserved]
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
| 3.1    | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Navistar International Corporation, dated February 12, 2015.  Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K which was dated and filed on February 18, 2015.  Commission File No. 001-09618. |
|   |   |
| 3.2    | Third Amended and Restated By-Laws of Navistar International Corporation effective October 5, 2012. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K, which was dated and filed on October 10, 2012. Commission File No. 001-09618. |
|   |   |
#### § 56.19101 Stopblocks and derail switches.

Positive stopblocks or a derail switch shall be installed on all tracks leading to a shaft collar or landing.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of RiskMetrics Group, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date:
February 24, 2010

/s/ DAVID M. OBSTLER David M. Obstler (Principal Financial Officer)


---
Exhibit 10.1




 




LIGHTBRIDGE, INC.




 




Amendment to the 1996

Stock Purchase Plan, as Amended




 




Effective May 30, 2002,

Paragraph 11(a) of the Lightbridge, Inc. 1996 Stock Purchase Plan, as amended,

was further amended by deleting the number “400,000” in the first sentence

thereof and substituting therefor the number “600,000.”
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 96-3882WM

_____________

Thomas Hughes, *

*

Plaintiff-Appellant, *

*

v. *

* Appeal from the United States

Michael Groose; * District Court for the Western

* District of Missouri.

Defendant, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Karen Cornell; Correctional Medical *

Systems, Inc.; Dr. Largaespada, *

*

Defendants-Appellees. *

_____________

 Submitted: December 1, 1997

Filed: December 17, 1997

_____________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Hughes appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor

of Karen Cornell and others involved in Hughes's medical care at the Jefferson City

Correctional Center. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties'

submissions, we are convinced the judgment of the district court was correct.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
----

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 7, 2009 |   /s/ Ronald A. Duncan |
|----------------------|-----------------------------|
|                 | Ronald A. Duncan            |
|                 | Chief Executive Officer     |
|                 | GCI, Inc.                   |

----
METAL / NONMETAL

Close Call

Surface Area of Underground Salt Mine – The bottom cone section of a

750 ton bin broke loose and fell onto the conveyors below, spilling about 

350 tons of salt on the ground. All persons were accounted for and there 

were no injuries. The areas surrounding the bin were barricaded to prevent 

access and the immediate area was marked with “caution tape” until an 

accident investigation could be conducted.

BEST PRACTICES

 Examine your work places for all possible hazards and correct them 

before you perform work. 

 Conduct structural inspections periodically. 

 Routinely examine metal structures for indications of weakened 

structural soundness (corrosion, fatigue cracks, bent/buckling beams, 

braces or columns, loose/missing connectors, broken welds, etc.).

 Keep corrosive material spillage/build-up removed from metal structures.

 Report all areas where indications of structural weakness are found.
|                                 |
|---------------------------------|
|                                 |  |  |  |  |
| Signature                       |   | Title |   | Date |
|                            |   |   |   |   |
| /s/  LEWIS B. CAMPBELL          |   | Executive Chairman andChief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer) |   | December 19, 2012 |
| Lewis B. Campbell               |   |   |   |
|                            |   |   |   |   |
| /s/  ANDREW J. CEDEROTH         |   | Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |   | December 19, 2012 |
| Andrew J. Cederoth              |   |   |   |
|                            |   |   |   |   |
| /s/  RICHARD C. TARAPCHAK       |   | Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) |   | December 19, 2012 |
| Richard Tarapchak               |   |   |   |
|                            |   |   |   |   |
| /s/  JOHN D. CORRENTI           |   | Director |   | December 19, 2012 |
| John D. Correnti                |   |   |   |   |
|                            |   |   |   |   |
| /s/  MICHAEL N. HAMMES          |   | Director |   | December 19, 2012 |
| Michael N. Hammes               |   |   |   |   |
|                            |   |   |   |   |
| /s/  VINCENT J. INTRIERI        |   | Director |   | December 19, 2012 |
| Vincent J. Intrieri             |   |   |   |   |
|                            |   |   |   |   |
| /s/  JAMES H. KEYES             |   | Director |   | December 19, 2012 |
| James H. Keyes                  |   |   |   |   |
|                            |   |   |   |   |
| /s/  STANLEY A. MCCHRYSTAL |   | Director |   | December 19, 2012 |
| Stanley A. McChrystal           |   |   |   |   |
|                            |   |   |   |   |
| /s/  SAMUEL J. MERKSAMER        |   | Director |   | December 18, 2012 |
| Samuel J. Merksamer             |   |   |   |   |
|                            |   |   |   |   |
| /s/  JOHN C. POPE          |   | Director |   | December 19, 2012 |
| John C. Pope                    |   |   |   |   |
|                            |   |   |   |   |
| /s/  MARK H. RACHESKY      |   | Director |   | December 19, 2012 |
| Mark H. Rachesky                |   |   |   |   |
|                            |   |   |   |   |
| /s/  DENNIS D. WILLIAMS         |   | Director |   | December 19, 2012 |
| Dennis D. Williams              |   |   |   |   |
#### § 736.1 Scope.

This part establishes standards and procedures for the promulgation, implementation, maintenance, administration, revision and termination of a Federal program for a State for coal exploration and surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-Federal and non-Indian lands within that State.
§ 50.11 Investigation. ( a ) After notification of an accident by an operator, the MSHA District Manager will promptly decide whether to conduct an accident investigation and will promptly inform the operator of his decision. If MSHA decides to investigate an accident, it will initiate the investigation within 24 hours of notification.
( b ) Each operator of a mine shall investigate each accident and each occupational injury at the mine. Each operator of a mine shall develop a report of each investigation. No operator may use Form 7000-1 as a report, except that an operator of a mine at which fewer than twenty miners are employed may, with respect to that mine, use Form 7000-1 as an investigation report respecting an occupational injury not related to an accident. No operator may use an investigation or an investigation report conducted or prepared by MSHA to comply with this paragraph. An operator shall submit a copy of any investigation report to MSHA at its request. Each report prepared by the operator shall include, ( 1 ) The date and hour of occurrence;
( 2 ) The date the investigation began;
( 3 ) The names of individuals participating in the investigation;
( 4 ) A description of the site;
( 5 ) An explanation of the accident or injury, including a description of any equipment involved and relevant events before and after the occurrence, and any explanation of the cause of any injury, the cause of any accident or cause of any other event which caused an injury;
( 6 ) The name, occupation, and experience of any miner involved;
( 7 ) A sketch, where pertinent, including dimensions depicting the occurrence;
( 8 ) A description of steps taken to prevent a similar occurrence in the future; and
( 9 ) Identification of any report submitted under § 50.20 of this part.
[42 FR 65535, Dec. 30, 1977, as amended at 69 FR 26499, May 13, 2004]