82524 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 244 / Friday, December 18, 2020 / Notices 

ACVETEO@dol.gov, subject line 

‘‘January 2021 ACVETEO Meeting.’’ 

Individuals who will need 

accommodations for a disability in order 

to attend the meeting (e.g., interpreting 

services, assistive listening devices, 

and/or materials in alternative format) 

should notify the Advisory Committee 

no later than Monday, January 4, 2021 

by contacting Mr. Gregory Green at 

ACVETEO@dol.gov. Requests made after 

this date will be reviewed, but 

availability of the requested 

accommodations cannot be guaranteed. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Gregory Green, Designated Federal 

Official for the ACVETEO, ACVETEO@

dol.gov, (202) 693–4734. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

ACVETEO is a Congressionally 

mandated advisory committee 

authorized under Title 38, U.S. Code, 

Section 4110 and subject to the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 

2, as amended. The ACVETEO is 

responsible for: assessing employment 

and training needs of veterans; 

determining the extent to which the 

programs and activities of the U.S. 

Department of Labor meet these needs; 

assisting to conduct outreach to 

employers seeking to hire veterans; 

making recommendations to the 

Secretary, through the Assistant 

Secretary for Veterans’ Employment and 

Training Service, with respect to 

outreach activities and employment and 

training needs of veterans; and carrying 

out such other activities necessary to 

make required reports and 

recommendations. The ACVETEO meets 

at least quarterly. 

Agenda 

9:00 a.m. Welcome and remarks, John 

Lowry, Assistant Secretary, 

Veterans’ Employment and Training 

Service 

9:10 a.m. Administrative Business, 

Gregory Green, Designated Federal 

Official 

9:15 a.m. Discussion on Fiscal Year 

2020 Report Recommendations, 

Committee Chairperson, Kayla 

Williams 

9:30 a.m. Update to Fiscal Year 2019 

Report Recommendations 

10:00 a.m. Subcommittee Discussion/ 

Assignments, Committee 

Chairperson, Kayla Williams 

11:00 a.m. Briefing on Fiscal Year 

2021 DOL/VETS Priorities 

11:30 a.m. Public Forum, Gregory 

Green, Designated Federal Official 

12:00 p.m. Adjourn 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 14th day of 

December 2020. 

John Lowry, 

Assistant Secretary, Veterans’ Employment 

and Training Service. 

[FR Doc. 2020–27835 Filed 12–17–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–79–P 

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Comment Request; National 

Science Foundation-Managed Honor 

Awards 

AGENCY: National Science Foundation. 

ACTION: Submission for OMB review; 

comment request. 

SUMMARY: The National Science 

Foundation (NSF) has submitted the 

following information collection 

requirement to OMB for review and 

clearance under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. This is the 

second notice for public comment; the 

first was published in the Federal 

Register, and no comments were 

received. NSF is forwarding the 

proposed submission to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

clearance simultaneously with the 

publication of this second notice. 

DATES: Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ 

PRAmain. Find this particular 

information collection by selecting 

‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open 

for Public Comments’’ or by using the 

search function. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Suzanne H. Plimpton, Reports Clearance 

Officer, National Science Foundation, 

2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, 

VA 22314, or send email to splimpto@

nsf.gov. Individuals who use a 

telecommunications device for the deaf 

(TDD) may call the Federal Information 

Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877– 

8339, which is accessible 24 hours a 

day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year 

(including federal holidays). 

Copies of the submission may be 

obtained by calling 703–292–7556. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NSF may 

not conduct or sponsor a collection of 

information unless the collection of 

information displays a currently valid 

OMB control number and the agency 

informs potential persons who are to 

respond to the collection of information 

that such persons are not required to 

respond to the collection of information 

unless it displays a currently valid OMB 

control number. 

Title of Collection: National Science 

Foundation-Managed Honor Awards. 

OMB Number: 3145–0035. 

Type of Request: Extension of 

approval of an information collection. 

Proposed Project: The National 

Science Foundation (NSF) administers 

several external awards, among them 

the President’s National Medal of 

Science, the Alan T. Waterman Award, 

the National Science Board (NSB) 

Vannevar Bush Award, the NSB Public 

Service Award, the Presidential Awards 

for Excellence in Science, Mathematics 

and Engineering Mentoring (PAESMEM) 

program, and the Presidential Awards 

for Excellence in Mathematics and 

Science Teaching (PAEMST) program. 

In 2003, to comply with E-government 

requirements, the nomination processes 

were converted to electronic submission 

through NSF’s FastLane system or via 

other electronic systems as described in 

the individual nomination process. 

Individuals can now prepare 

nominations and references through 

www.fastlane.nsf.gov/honawards/ for all 

but the PAESMEM and PAEMST 

awards. First-time users must register on 

the Fastlane website using the link 

found in the upper right-hand corner 

above the ‘‘Log In’’ box before accessing 

all but the PAESMEM and PAEMST 

honorary award categories. For 

PAEMST nominations and applications 

are submitted on the PAEMST portal at 

www.paemst.org. For PAESMEM, 

nominations and applications are 

submitted on the PAESMEM portal at 

www.paesmem.net. 

Use of the Information: The 

Foundation has the following honorary 

award programs: 

• President’s National Medal of 

Science. Statutory authority for the 

President’s National Medal of Science is 

contained in 42 U.S.C. 1881 (P.L. 86– 

209), which established the award and 

stated that ‘‘(t)he President shall . . . 

award the Medal on the 

recommendations received from the 

National Academy of Sciences or on the 

basis of such other information and 

evidence as . . . appropriate.’’ 

Subsequently, Executive Order 10961 

specified procedures for the Award by 

establishing a National Medal of Science 

Committee which would ‘‘receive 

recommendations made by any other 

nationally representative scientific or 

engineering organization.’’ On the basis 

of these recommendations, the 

Committee was directed to select its 

candidates and to forward its 

recommendations to the President. 

In 1962, to comply with these 

directives, the Committee initiated a 

solicitation form letter to invite these 

nominations. In 1979, the Committee 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 244 / Friday, December 18, 2020 / Notices 82525 

initiated a nomination form as an 

attachment to the solicitation letter. A 

slightly modified version of the 

nomination form was used in 1980. 

The Committee has established the 

following considerations for selection of 

candidates: 

a. The impact of an individual’s body 

of work on the current state of his or her 

field of science or engineering; 

b. Whether the individual’s 

achievements are of an unusually 

significant nature in relation to the 

potential effects on the development of 

thought in his or her field of science or 

engineering; 

c. Whether the nominee has 

demonstrated unusually distinguished 

service in the general advancement of 

science and/or engineering for the 

Nation, especially when accompanied 

by substantial contributions to the 

content of science; 

d. The recognition of the nominee by 

peers within his or her community, and 

whether s/he is recognized for 

substantial impact in fields in addition 

to his/her discipline; 

e. If the nominee has made 

contributions to innovation and 

industry; 

f. Whether the nominee has 

demonstrated sustained influence on 

education through publications, 

teaching activities, outreach, mentoring, 

etc., and; 

g. Whether the nominee’s 

contributions have created significant 

positive impact for the Nation. 

In 2003, the Committee changed the 

active period of eligibility to three years, 

including the year of nomination. After 

that time, candidates must be 

renominated with a new nomination 

package for them to be considered by 

the Committee. 

Narratives are now restricted to three 

pages of text, as stipulated in the 

guidelines at: https://

www.fastlane.nsf.gov/honawards/ 

medalHome.do 

• Alan T. Waterman Award. Congress 

established the Alan T. Waterman 

Award in August 1975 (42 U.S.C. 1881a 

(P.L. 94–86) and authorized NSF to 

‘‘establish the Alan T. Waterman Award 

for research or advanced study in any of 

the sciences or engineering’’ to mark the 

25th anniversary of the National Science 

Foundation and to honor its first 

Director. The annual award recognizes 

an outstanding young researcher in any 

field of science or engineering 

supported by NSF. In addition to a 

medal, the awardee receives a grant of 

$1,000,000 over a five-year period for 

scientific research or advanced study in 

the mathematical, physical, medical, 

biological, engineering, social, or other 

sciences at the institution of the 

recipient’s choice. 

The Alan T. Waterman Award 

Committee was established by NSF to 

comply with the directive contained in 

Public Law 94–86. The Committee 

solicits nominations from members of 

the National Academy of Sciences, 

National Academy of Engineering, 

scientific and technical organizations, 

and any other source, public or private, 

as appropriate. 

In 1976, the Committee initiated a 

form letter to solicit these nominations. 

In 1980, a nomination form was used 

which standardized the nomination 

procedures, allowed for more effective 

Committee review, and permitted better 

staff work in a short period of time. On 

the basis of its review, the Committee 

forwards its recommendation to the 

Director, NSF, and the National Science 

Board (NSB). 

Candidates must be U.S. citizens or 

permanent residents and must be 40 

years of age or younger or not more than 

ten years beyond receipt of the Ph.D. 

degree by December 31 of the year in 

which they are nominated. Candidates 

should have demonstrated exceptional 

individual achievements in scientific or 

engineering research of sufficient 

quality to place them at the forefront of 

their peers. Criteria include originality, 

innovation, and significant impact on 

the field. 

• Vannevar Bush Award. The 

Vannevar Bush Award honors truly 

exceptional lifelong leaders in science 

and technology who have made 

substantial contributions to the welfare 

of the Nation through public service 

activities in science, technology, and 

public policy. The National Science 

Board established this award in 1980 in 

the memory of Vannevar Bush, who 

served as a science advisor to President 

Franklin Roosevelt during World War II, 

helped to establish Federal funding for 

science and engineering as a national 

priority during peacetime, and was 

behind the creation of the National 

Science Foundation. 

The Vannevar Bush Award recipient 

is selected annually by the National 

Science Board’s Subcommittee on 

Honorary Awards (AWD), which is 

established to solicit nominations from 

scientific, engineering, and educational 

societies and institutions, in both the 

public and private sectors. 

Candidates for the Vannevar Bush 

Award should have demonstrated 

outstanding leadership and 

accomplishment in meeting at least two 

of the following selection criteria: 

1. Candidates must be U.S. citizens. 

2. Distinguished himself/herself 

through public service activities in 

science and technology. 

3. Pioneered the exploration, charting, 

and settlement of new frontiers in 

science, technology, education, and 

public service. 

4. Demonstrated leadership and 

creativity that have inspired others to 

distinguished careers in science and 

technology. 

5. Contributed to the welfare of the 

Nation and humankind through 

activities in science and technology. 

6. Demonstrated leadership and 

creativity that has helped mold the 

history of advancements in the Nation’s 

science, technology, and education. 

Nomination Submissions must 

include: 

1. A current curriculum vita without 

publications (no more than 5 pages). 

2. A narrative statement (no more 

than 8 pages) addressing the candidate’s 

activities and contributions related to 

the selection criteria. 

3. A proposed award citation 

addressing the candidate’s activities in 

and contributions to national public 

service activities in science, technology, 

and public policy. 

4. Contact information for award 

candidate and nominator (mailing 

address, email address, and phone 

number). 

5. Two reference letters (no more than 

2 pages each) from individuals familiar 

with the candidate’s accomplishments, 

and not affiliated with the candidate’s 

home institution. Letters should be 

submitted by email to nsbawards@

nsf.gov on letterhead as a PDF file. 

Nominations remain active for three 

years, including the year of nomination. 

After that time, candidates must be 

renominated with a new nomination for 

them to be considered by the selection 

committee. 

• NSB Public Service Award. The 

National Science Board established the 

Public Service Award in November 

1996 to honor individuals and groups 

that have made substantial 

contributions to increasing public 

understanding of science and 

engineering in the United States. These 

contributions may be in a wide variety 

of areas that have the potential of 

contributing to public understanding of 

and appreciation for science and 

engineering—including mass media, 

education and/or training programs, and 

entertainment. 

Eligibility includes any individual or 

group (company, corporation or 

organization) that has increased the 

public understanding of science or 

engineering. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
82526 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 244 / Friday, December 18, 2020 / Notices 

Candidates for the NSB Public Service 

Award should have demonstrated 

outstanding leadership and 

accomplishment in meeting the 

following selection criteria: 

1. Increased the public’s 

understanding of the processes of 

science and engineering through 

scientific discovery, innovation, and its 

communication to the public. 

2. Encouraged others to help raise the 

public understanding of science and 

technology. 

3. Promoted the engagement of 

scientists and engineers in public 

outreach and scientific literacy. 

4. Contributed to the development of 

broad science and engineering policy 

and its support. 

5. Influenced and encouraged the next 

generation of scientists and engineers. 

6. Achieved broad recognition outside 

of the candidate’s area of specialization. 

7. Fostered awareness of science and 

technology among broad segments of the 

population. 

Note: Members of the U.S. 

Government are not eligible for this 

award. 

Nomination Procedures: 

Nominations for an individual must 

include: 

1. A current curriculum vita without 

publications (no more than 3 pages). 

2. A narrative statement (no more 

than 5 pages) addressing the following: 

a. the candidate’s public service 

activities in science and engineering, 

and 

b. the candidate’s contributions to 

public understanding of science and 

engineering, as they relate to the 

selection criteria. 

3. Contact information of candidate 

and nominator (mailing address, email 

address, phone number). 

Nominations must be submitted by 

email to: nsbawards@nsf.gov. 

Nominations for a group must 

include: 

1. A narrative statement (no more 

than 5 pages) addressing the following: 

a. the group’s activities, and how it 

accomplishes the selection criteria for 

the award, 

b. length of years of the program, 

c. number and type of individuals 

served by the group’s activities; and 

d. data on the success of the program 

(if available). 

2. Contact information of candidate 

and nominator (mailing address, email 

address, phone number). 

3. Reference letters are optional, and 

up to 3 letters (no more than to 2 pages 

each) may be submitted on letterhead as 

a PDF file. 

Nominations must be submitted by 

email to: nsbawards@nsf.gov. 

Nominations remain active for three 

years, including the year of nomination. 

After that time, candidates must be renominated with a new nomination for 

them to be considered by the selection 

committee. 

• Presidential Awards for Excellence in 

Science, Mathematics and 

Engineering Mentoring (PAESMEM) 

program 

In 1996, the White House, through the 

National Science and Technology 

Council (NSTC) and the Office of 

Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), 

established the Presidential Awards for 

Excellence in Science, Mathematics and 

Engineering Mentoring (PAESMEM) 

program. The program, administered on 

behalf of the White House by the 

National Science Foundation, seeks to 

identify outstanding mentoring efforts 

or programs designed to enhance the 

participation of groups (women, 

minorities and persons with disabilities 

as well as groups from low 

socioeconomic regions) 

underrepresented in science, 

mathematics and engineering. The 

awardees will serve as exemplars to 

their colleagues and will be leaders in 

the national effort to more fully develop 

the Nation’s human resources in 

science, mathematics and engineering. 

This award is managed at NSF by the 

Directorate for Education and Human 

Resources (EHR). 

The award will be made to U.S. 

citizens or U.S. permanent residents 

based on the following: (1) An 

individual who has demonstrated 

outstanding and sustained mentoring 

and effective guidance to a significant 

number of early career STEM 

professionals, students at the K–12, 

undergraduate, or graduate education 

level or (2) to an organization that, 

through its programming, has enabled a 

substantial number of students 

underrepresented in science, 

mathematics and engineering to 

successfully pursue and complete the 

relevant degree programs as well as 

mentoring of early career STEM 

professionals. Nominees must have 

served in a mentoring role for at least 

five years. Nominations are reviewed for 

impact, significance of the mentoring 

throrganizational awards must 

demonstrate rigorous evaluation and/or 

assessment during the five-year period 

of the mentoring activity. 

Award Ceremony 

The awardees are hosted for two days 

in Washington, DC, for celebratory 

activities. Recipients of the PAESMEM 

award receive a monetary award in the 

amount of $10,000 from NSF and a 

commemorative Presidential certificate. 

If scheduling permits, the President 

meets with the mentors for a photo 

opportunity at the White House. The 

Director of OSTP and the Director of 

NSF present the awards to the mentors 

at an awards ceremony. 

• Presidential Award for Excellence 

in Mathematics and Science Teaching 

The Presidential Award for 

Excellence in Mathematics and Science 

Teaching (PAEMST) is the highest 

recognition that a kindergarten through 

12th-grade mathematics or science 

teacher may receive for outstanding 

teaching in the United States. Enacted 

by Congress in 1983, this program 

authorizes the President to bestow 108 

awards with two per state or 

jurisdiction, assuming there are 

qualified applicants. Awards are given 

in the science category, which includes 

science and engineering, and the 

mathematics category, which includes 

mathematics, technology and computer 

science. In even-numbered y]ears, 

nominations are accepted for 

elementary teachers (grades K–6); in 

odd-numbered years, secondary 

teachers (grades 7–12) are nominated. 

This award is managed at NSF by the 

Directorate for Education and Human 

Resources (EHR). 

Nomination Criteria 

A teacher may be nominated by a 

principal, another teacher, students, 

members of the community, or the 

general public. Self-nominations are 

allowed. Awardees must be either U.S. 

Citizens or U.S. Permanent Residents. A 

Nominee must meet the following 

criteria to apply: 

• Teach science, technology, 

engineering, mathematics, and/or 

computer science as part of his or her 

contracted teaching responsibilities at 

the K–6 grade level in a public 

(including charter) or private school; 

• hold at least a bachelor’s degree 

from an accredited institution; 

• be a full-time employee of his or her 

school or school district as determined 

by state and district policies, with 

responsibilities for teaching students no 

less than 50% of the school’s allotted 

instructional time; 

• have at least five years of full-time 

employment as a K–12 teacher prior to 

the academic school year in which they 

apply, with science, technology, 

engineering, mathematics, and/or 

computer science teaching duties each 

of the past five years; 

• teach in one of the 50 states, the 

District of Columbia, the 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the 

Department of Defense Education 

Activity schools, or the U.S. Territories 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 244 / Friday, December 18, 2020 / Notices 82527 

as a group (American Samoa, Guam, 

Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 

Islands, and U.S. Virgin Islands); 

• be a U.S. citizen or permanent 

resident; and 

• not have received the PAEMST 

award at the national level in any prior 

competition or category. 

Application Process 

• Applicants complete a narrative on 

five dimensions of outstanding teaching 

(content knowledge, pedagogy, 

assessment, leadership and professional 

development), submit a video of one 

class, supplemental materials, and 

references cited. Three letters of 

reference including one from a school 

official are required, along with a 

resume or biographical sketch. 

• The applicant completes an 

application and submits for state review 

during the academic year. The 

nomination period runs through the 

application cycle up to one month 

before the application deadline. 

Review of Nominations 

• State coordinators convene state 

selection committees of prominent 

mathematicians, scientists, mathematics 

and science educators, and past 

awardees to select up to three 

mathematics category and three science 

category finalists for recognition at the 

state level and for submission to NSF. 

To ensure consistency, state selection 

committees review their applications 

using the same criteria and scoring 

information that was approved by 

OSTP. Following the state review 

applicants are given two weeks to 

complete an addendum to the state 

application that addresses state reviewer 

comments. 

• NSF (EHR) convenes a National 

Selection Committee of prominent 

mathematicians, scientists, mathematics 

and science educators, and past 

awardees that review the application 

packets of the state finalists including 

the addendum and make 

recommendations to NSF. NSF reviews 

the state selection committee 

recommendations and recommends to 

OSTP, when possible, one awardee in 

the mathematics category and one in the 

science category for all eligible states/ 

jurisdictions. Alternatively, NSF may 

recommend two awardees from a 

discipline in a jurisdiction, when 

warranted. 

Award Ceremony 

The awardees are hosted for 3–4 days 

in Washington, DC, for a variety of 

professional development sessions and 

celebratory activities. Each awardee 

receives a citation signed by the 

President and $10,000 from NSF. If 

scheduling permits, the President meets 

the teachers for a photo opportunity at 

the White House. The Director of OSTP 

and the Director of NSF present the 

citations to the teachers at an awards 

ceremony. Awardees also have the 

opportunity to meet their congressional 

representatives and education 

representatives from other federal 

agencies. 

Estimate of Burden: These are annual 

award programs with application 

deadlines varying according to the 

program. Public burden also may vary 

according to program; however, across 

all the programs, it is estimated that 

each submission will average 19 hours 

per respondent. If the nominator is 

thoroughly familiar with the 

disciplinary background of the nominee, 

time spent to complete the nomination 

may be considerably reduced. 

Respondents: Individuals, businesses 

or other for-profit organizations, 

universities, non-profit institutions, and 

Federal and State governments. 

Estimated Number of Responses per 

Award: 1800 responses, broken down as 

follows: For the President’s National 

Medal of Science, 80; for the Alan T. 

Waterman Award, 70; for the Vannevar 

Bush Award, 20; for the Public Service 

Award, 30; for the PAESMEM, 200; and 

1400 for the PAEMST. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden on 

Respondents: 41,350 hours, broken 

down by 1,600 hours for the President’s 

National Medal of Science (20 hours per 

80 respondents); 1,400 hours for the 

Alan T. Waterman Award (20 hours per 

70 respondents); 300 hours for the 

Vannevar Bush Award (15 hours per 20 

respondents); 450 hours for the Public 

Service Award (15 hours per 30 

respondents); 4,000 hours for the 

PAESMEM (20 hours per 200 

respondents); and 33,600 hours for the 

PAEMST (24 hours per 1400 

respondents). 

Frequency of Responses: Annually. 

Comments: Comments are invited on 

(a) whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Agency, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the Agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the proposed 

collection of information; (c) ways to 

enhance the quality, utility, and clarity 

of the information on respondents, 

including through the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology; (d) ways to 

minimize the burden of the collection of 

information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

Dated: December 15, 2020. 

Suzanne H. Plimpton, 

Reports Clearance Officer, National Science 

Foundation. 

[FR Doc. 2020–27984 Filed 12–17–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[NRC–2020–0001] 

Sunshine Act Meetings 

TIME AND DATE: Weeks of December 14, 

21, 28, 2020, January 4, 11, 18, 25, 2021. 

PLACE: Commissioners’ Conference 

Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 

Maryland. 

STATUS: Public. 

Week of December 14, 2020 

Thursday, December 17, 2020 

2:30 p.m. Affirmation Session (Public 

Meeting) (Tentative) 

a. Interim Storage Partners, LLC (WCS 

Consolidated Interim Storage 

Facility), Appeals of LBP–19–7: 

Fasken Proposed New Contention 

Based on Draft Environmental 

Impact Statement (Tentative) 

(Contact: Denise McGovern: 301–415– 

0681) 

Additional Information: Due to 

COVID–19, there will be no physical 

public attendance. The public is invited 

to attend the Commission’s meeting live 

via teleconference. Details for joining 

the teleconference in listen only mode 

can be found at https://www.nrc.gov/ 

pmns/mtg. 

b. Interim Storage Partners, LLC (WCS 

Consolidated Interim Storage 

Facility), Sierra Club Appeal of 

LBP–19–9 (Denying Motion to 

Amend and Granting Motion to 

Dismiss), LBP–19–7 (Denial of 

Contentions) 

(Tentative) 

(Contact: Denise McGovern: 301–415– 

0681) 

Additional Information: By a vote of 

5–0 on December 15, 2020, the 

Commission determined pursuant to 5 

U.S.C. 552b(e)(1) and 10 CFR 9.107 that 

the above referenced Affirmation 

Session be held with less than one week 

notice to the public. The meeting will be 

held on December 17, 2020. Due to 

COVID–19, there will be no physical 

public attendance. The public is invited 

to attend the Commission’s meeting live 

via teleconference. Details for joining 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES