alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STEADMAN vs. SEAWELL *&*MINSHILL.

[GAKNISHMENT.]

1. *Judgment in circuit court on appeal from justice’s court; when void.*— A judgment by default rendered in the circuit court, on the trial of an appeal from a justice, against the appellee, who has not been notified of the. appeal, will be reversed.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Marengo.

Tried before Hon. M. J. Saeeold.

The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

J. C. Compton, for appellant.

Eugene McCaa, *contra.*

B. F. SAFFOLD, J.

The appellant was garnishee in an attachment suit commenced by the appellees against W. W. Steadman, before a justice. That court refused to render judgment against him on his answer, but *allowed*him to answer over, or appear before him at an appointed time to show cause why judgment should not be given against him. No further action seems to have been taken in the matter by the justice. The plaintiffs appealed to the circuit court, but no notice of the appeal is shown to have been given to the garnishee. Judgment by default was there rendered against him without jurisdiction obtained of his person. — Eev. Code, §§ 3260, 3295.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.
#### § 57.19095 Location of signal devices.

Hoisting signal devices shall be positioned within easy reach of persons on the shaft bottom or constantly attended by a person stationed on the lower deck of the sinking platform.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          82,027
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  592,391
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               784,494
<PP&E>                                       3,079,906
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,225,898
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,929,337
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         61
<COMMON>                                        82,448
<OTHER-SE>                                     (40,659)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,225,898
<SALES>                                      5,485,008
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,485,008
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            (8,252,366)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,767,358)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (217,658)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,549,700)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,549,700)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.62)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 943.146 What impact does the use of a subsidiary, affiliate, or joint venture have on financial accountability to HUD and the Federal government?

None; the subsidiary, affiliate, or joint venture is subject to the same authority of HUD, HUD's Inspector General, and the Comptroller General to audit its conduct.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of First Community Financial Corporation, (the
Company) for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Jody D. Graybill, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                        |  |     |  |                              
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: February 24, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ Jody D. Graybill         
|                        |  |     |  | Jody D. Graybill, President  
|                        |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
#### Sidney Weisner v. 791 Park Avenue Corporation.

Motion for leave to reargue denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Yalente, McNally and Bastow, JJ.
### §1911. Additional annual authorization of appropriations

#### (a) In general

In addition to amounts that may be made available to the Secretary under the Fund for a fiscal year, there is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary for each fiscal year, beginning with fiscal year 2020, $16,000,000, to carry out the grant program for the National Flagship Language Initiative under section 1902(a)(1)(D) of this title.

#### (b) Funding from Intelligence Community Management Account for fiscal years beginning with fiscal year 2005

In addition to amounts that may be made available to the Secretary under the Fund for a fiscal year, the Director of National Intelligence shall transfer to the Secretary from amounts appropriated for the Intelligence Community Management Account for each of fiscal years 2005 through 2021 $6,000,000 to carry out the grant program for the National Flagship Language Initiative under section 1902(a)(1)(D) of this title.

#### (c) Availability of appropriated funds

Amounts made available under this section shall remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 102–183, title VIII, §811, as added Pub. L. 107–306, title III, §333(b), Nov. 27, 2002, 116 Stat. 2397; amended Pub. L. 108–487, title VI, §602(b), Dec. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 3953; Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title XVI, §1623, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1735; Pub. L. 116–260, div. W, title VI, §619(b), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2401.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2020—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–260, §619(b)(1), which directed substitution of "$16,000,000" for "$10,000,000", could not be executed because "$10,000,000" did not appear in text after the amendment by Pub. L. 116–92. See 2019 Amendment note below.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 116–260, §619(b)(2), substituted "for each of fiscal years 2005 through 2021" for "for each fiscal year, beginning with fiscal year 2005,".

2019—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–92, which directed amendment of section 811(a) of the Fair Chance Act (50 U.S.C. 1911(a)) by substituting "fiscal year 2020" for "fiscal year 2003" and "$16,000,000" for "$10,000,000", was executed to subsec. (a) of this section, which is section 811 of the David L. Boren National Security Education Act of 1991, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

2004—Subsecs. (b), (c). Pub. L. 108–487 added subsecs. (b) and (c) and struck out heading and text of former subsec. (b). Text read as follows: "Amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations under subsection (a) shall remain available until expended."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date the Secretary of Defense submits the report required under section 334 of Pub. L. 107–306 and notifies the appropriate committees of Congress that the programs carried out under this chapter are being managed in a fiscally and programmatically sound manner, see section 333(c) of Pub. L. 107–306, set out as an Effective Date of 2002 Amendment note under section 1902 of this title.
#### § 57.9361 Drawholes.

To prevent hazards to persons underground, collars of open drawholes shall be free of muck or materials except during transfer of the muck or material through the drawhole.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBuckling Behavior of Long Anisotropic Plates Subjected to Combined LoadsA parametric study of the buckling behavior of infinitely long symmetrically laminated anisotropic plates subjected to combined loads is presented. The study focuses on the interaction of a stable subcritical secondary loading state of constant magnitude and a primary destabilizing load that is increased in magnitude until buckling occurs. The loads considered are uniform axial compression, pure inplane bending, transverse tension and compression, and shear. Results obtained using a special purpose plates with a significant potential for reducing structural nondimensional analysis that is well suited for parametric studies are presented for clamped and simply supported plates. In particular, results are presented for a (+/- 45)(sub s) graphite-epoxy laminate, and generic buckling design charts are presented for a wide range of non-dimensional parameters that are applicable to a broad class of laminate constructions. These results show the effects of flexural orthotropy and flexural anisotropy on plates subjected to various combined loading conditions. An important finding of the present study is that the effect of flexural anisotropy herein as flexural anisotropy on the buckling resistance of a plate can be increased significantly for certain types of combined loads.Document ID19960047464Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsNemeth, Michael P.*(NASA Hampton, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 13, 1995Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-111625NAS 1.15:111625AIAA Paper 95-1455Meeting InformationMeeting: AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials ConferenceLocation: New Orleans, LACountry: United StatesStart Date: April 10, 1995End Date: April 13, 1995Sponsors:American Chemical Society,American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics,American Society of Civil Engineers,American Society of Mechanical Engineers,American Helicopter Society, Inc.Accession Number96N33132Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19960047464.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 57.22309 Methane monitors (V-A mines). ( a ) Methane monitors shall be installed on continuous mining machines used in or beyond the last open crosscut.
( b ) The monitors shall— ( 1 ) Give warning at 1.0 percent methane.
( 2 ) Automatically deenergize electrical equipment, except power to monitoring equipment determined by MSHA to be intrinsically safe under 30 CFR part 18, and prevent starting of such equipment when methane levels reach 1.5 percent; and
( 3 ) Automatically deenergize the equipment when power to a sensor is interrupted.
( c ) Sensing units of monitors shall be positioned at a location which provides for the most effective measurement of methane.
MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT REGULATION IX PUBLIC RECORDS

4/20/25 Rule 904 1 RULE 904. TRADE SECRETS--PROCEDURE WHEN INSPECTION IS REQUESTED

(Adopted 3-8-84; and Repealed April 20, 2005)
#### § 581.19 Lease term.

An OCS mineral lease for OCS minerals other than sand and gravel shall be for a primary term of not less than 20 years as stipulated in the leasing notice. The primary lease term for each OCS mineral shall be determined based on exploration and development requirements for the OCS minerals being offered by the Secretary. An OCS mineral lease for sand and gravel shall be for a primary term of 10 years unless otherwise stipulated in the leasing notice. A lease will continue beyond the specified primary term for so long thereafter as leased OCS minerals are being produced in accordance with an approved mining operation or the lessee is otherwise in compliance with provisions of the lease and the regulations in this chapter under which a lessee can earn continuance of the OCS mineral lease in effect.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark L. Lana, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of HS3 Technologies Inc.
      for the year ended June 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of HS3 Technologies Inc.                                                           

Dated: September 28, 2010

| | /s/
      Mark L. Lana              
| | ------------------------------------
| | Mark L. Lana                        
| | Chief Executive Officer and Director
| | (Principal Financial Officer)       
| | HS3 Technologies Inc.               



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to HS3 Technologies
Inc. and will be retained by HS3 Technologies Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9642 

To amend title 46, United States Code, to require applicants for grants 

that propose to use digital infrastructure or a software component to 

certify the applicant has an approved security plan that addresses the 

cybersecurity risks of such digital infrastructure or software, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2024 

Mr. WEBSTER of Florida (for himself and Mr. CARBAJAL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 46, United States Code, to require applicants 

for grants that propose to use digital infrastructure or 

a software component to certify the applicant has an 

approved security plan that addresses the cybersecurity 

risks of such digital infrastructure or software, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Investments 

5 in Our Ports Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9642 IH

1 SEC. 2. PORT INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 

2 APPLICATION PROCESS. 

3 Section 54301(a)(5)(A) of title 46, United States 

4 Code, is amended— 

5 (1) by striking ‘‘To be eligible’’ and inserting 

6 the following: 

7 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—To be eligible’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(ii) ENSURING CYBERSECURITY.—If 

11 an applicant for a grant under this sub12 section is applying to use the grant to ac13 quire digital infrastructure or a software 

14 component, such applicant shall— 

15 ‘‘(I) certify the applicant has an 

16 approved security plan pursuant to 

17 section 70103(c) that addresses the 

18 cybersecurity risks of such digital in19 frastructure or software; or 

20 ‘‘(II) provide a brief description 

21 in the application of how the applicant 

22 will address the cybersecurity risks of 

23 such digital infrastructure or software 

24 if the applicant does not have such 

25 approved security plan. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 9642 IH

1 ‘‘(iii) UPDATE OF FACILITY SECURITY

2 PLAN.—An applicant for a grant under 

3 this subsection applying to use such grant 

4 to acquire digital infrastructure or a soft5 ware component that does not have an ap6 proved security plan pursuant to section 

7 70103(c) that addresses the cybersecurity 

8 risks of such digital infrastructure or soft9 ware shall ensure that the security plan 

10 under section 70103(c) of such applicant is 

11 updated to address the cybersecurity risks 

12 described in clause (ii)(II) in the next up13 date required under paragraph (3)(G) of 

14 such section.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
### INTHE SUPREME COURT OF 

### THE STATE OF MONTANA DA22-0051
STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiffand Appellee,
v. VERNON A. JOHNSON,

Defendant and Appellant. 

# G6 MAY1

-5 /2022 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Suprerne Court State of tvlontana ORDER

This Court reviews briefs to ensure compliance with Rules 10, 11, 12, and 13 of the Montana Rules ofAppellate Procedure. On March 25, 2022, Appellant Vernon A. Johnson, via counsel, submitted his OpeningBrieftothisCourt. The Clerk submitted the filing to this Court's briefreviewprocess and upon review, it was accepted for filing. However, it has come to our attention that the brief was not properly served in accordance with M. R. App. P. 10(2), which requires that all briefs in criminal cases appealed by the defendant shall be served upon both the County Attorney and the Attorney General. The certificate of service on Appellant's brief indicates that it was served only upon aDeputy County Attorney in Yellowstone County. Thus thisbriefwas incorrectly accepted for filing and Appellant rnust correct the deficient filing for this matter toproceed. IT ISTHEREFORE ORDERED that Appellant shall, within 10 days, serve a copy of Appellant's brief on the Attorney General of the State of Montana and upon the Yellowstone County Attorney and shall file with the Clerk of this Court an Amended Certificate ofService indicatingsuch service. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all further briefing deadlines shall run from the date Appellant submits the Amended Certificate of Service and as provided in M. R. App. P. 13(1). 05/09/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0051

### IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that ifthe Clerk ofthis Court does not receive an

amended Certificate of Service within 10 days of the date of this Order, Appellant's OpeningBriefshallbe rejected. The Clerk of this Court is directed to provide a true copy of this Order to all counsel ofrecord. DATED this day ofMay, 2022.
FortheCourt,

ChiefJustice

2
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT



I, Hope Ni, Chief Financial Officer of Comtech Group, Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Comtech Group,
Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:



a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                   |  |                               
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2005 |  | /s/ Hope Ni                   
|                   |  | Hope Ni                       
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer       
|                   |  | (Principal Accounting Officer)
### §§201 to 204. Repealed. Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §53, 70A Stat. 641

Section 201, R.S. §5297, provided for Federal aid for State Governments in case of an insurrection in any State. See section 251 of Title 10, Armed Forces.

Section 202, R.S. §5298, related to use of military and naval forces to enforce authority of Federal Government. See section 252 of Title 10.

Section 203, R.S. §5299, related to denial by State of equal protection of laws and authorized the President to take measures for the suppression of any insurrection, domestic violence, or combinations. See section 253 of Title 10.

Section 204, R.S. §5300, authorized the President to issue a proclamation commanding insurgents to disperse. See section 254 of Title 10.