alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION



I, Bernard Kravitz, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Dionics, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.





Dated:    August 12, 2008

By:

/s/ Bernard Kravitz

Bernard Kravitz,

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,504,240
<RECEIVABLES>                               24,124,058
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                         22,409,925
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                       37,316,830
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                         33,938,030
<PP&E>                                         604,298
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             122,274,817
<SHORT-TERM>                                 2,184,841
<PAYABLES>                                  20,206,958
<REPOS-SOLD>                                51,128,825
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                         17,345,976
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                          16,695,677
<LONG-TERM>                                  6,357,320
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          200,000
<PREFERRED>                                    375,000
<COMMON>                                        12,744
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,773,261
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               122,274,817
<TRADING-REVENUE>                              384,756
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           223,310
<COMMISSIONS>                                  471,159
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                  512,901
<FEE-REVENUE>                                   35,209
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             604,090
<COMPENSATION>                               1,066,062
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                389,200
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     245,200
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   245,200
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.72


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                CERTIFICATION OF
           CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                        OF UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY


     This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A
(the "Form 10-KSB/A") for the year ended December 31, 2003, of Universal
Detection Technology (the "Issuer").


     I, Jacques Tizabi, the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial
Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the best of my knowledge:


     (i)  the Form 10-KSB/A fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
          U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

     (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-KSB/A fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Issuer.

        Dated:  September 17, 2004.




                                                   /s/   Jacques Tizabi
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Name: Jacques Tizabi
§ 585.211 What is the Call? ( a ) The Call is a notice that BOEM will publish in the Federal Register requesting responses from stakeholders interested in bidding on designated OCS areas and comments from interested and potentially affected parties. The responses may inform the area identification process and will enable BOEM to determine whether there exists competitive interest in the proposed lease area. BOEM may request additional information from stakeholders related to environmental, economic, and other issues.
( b ) The Call may include the following: ( 1 ) The areas that BOEM has preliminarily identified for leasing consideration;
( 2 ) A request for comments concerning geological conditions; archaeological sites on the seabed or nearshore; multiple uses of the proposed leasing area (including, for example, navigation, recreation, military, and fisheries); and other socioeconomic, biological, and environmental information;
( 3 ) Request for comments regarding feasibility for development, including the energy resource and opportunity for grid connection;
( 4 ) Possible lease terms and conditions;
( 5 ) A request to potential bidders to nominate one or more areas for a commercial renewable energy lease within the preliminarily identified leasing areas. Such nominations must include: ( i ) The specific OCS blocks that the respondent is interested in leasing;
( ii ) A general description of the respondent's objectives and how respondent proposes to achieve those objectives;
( iii ) A preliminary schedule of the respondent's proposed activities, including those potentially leading to commercial operations, to the extent known;
( iv ) Information regarding respondent's coordination, or intent to coordinate, with any other entity for the purposes of acquiring a lease from BOEM, if applicable;
( v ) Documentation demonstrating the respondent's qualification to acquire a lease or grant as specified in §§ 585.107 and 585.108;
( vi ) Available and pertinent information concerning renewable energy and environmental conditions in the nominated areas, including energy and resource data and information used to evaluate the areas; and
( vii ) Any additional information requested by BOEM in the Call;
( c ) Respondents have 45 calendar days from the date the Call is published in the Federal Register to reply, unless BOEM specifies another time period of not less than 30 calendar days in the Call.
( d ) BOEM may use the information received in response to a Call to: ( 1 ) Identify lease areas;
( 2 ) Develop options for its lease provisions (*e.g.,* stipulations, payments, terms, and conditions);
( 3 ) Inform its environmental analysis conducted under applicable Federal requirements, including, but not limited to, NEPA, the Endangered Species Act (ESA) (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544), and the CZMA; and
( 4 ) Determine whether competitive interest exists in all or a portion of any potential lease area. If BOEM determines no competitive interest exists, BOEM may follow the noncompetitive leasing process set forth in § 585.231(d) through (j).
#### In the Matter of the Claim of David Kaplan, Respondent, v. William Yudin et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal by an alleged employer and his insurance carrier from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, appellants contending that claimant was an independent contractor. The board found upon substantial evidence that claimant, a carpenter, had worked for the employer, a building contractor, off and on for three years, being paid $18 per day; that he had been so employed for two or three days repairing arches and floors when the employer requested him to install a cabinet in the same building and took him to the factory to get a cabinet, found the factory closed and told claimant to return and get the cabinet later; that claimant said the cabinet was too heavy for him to handle alone and the employer told him to get a helper and that he would pay for the cabinet and the helper; that claimant arranged for one Chaprack to help and figured the cost at $115 which included $54 for labor of the two men for one and one-half days at $18. Claimant was hurt before the work was done and the employer issued a check to claimant and Chaprack for $112,40, the difference of $2.60 being for lumber supplied by the employer, and, claimant being disabled, Chaprack paid for the cabinet and he and claimant retained the balance. Upon the entire record, the board was not bound to find that the parties contemplated the termination of the prior employment status and the creation of an independent contractual arrangement. The latter was not conclusively established by either the advance computation or method of payment of the labor cost, although another trier of the facts might have given greater effect to each. Appellants’ argument is in some considerable part predicated on the alleged employer’s testimony. The board was, of course, entitled to reject this evidence but, further and under the circumstances surrounding the witness’ failure to produce certain records, to indulge an affirmative inference supportive of the claim. Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present—Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSummary Report of Mission Acceleration Measurements for MSL-1: STS-83, Launched April 14, 1997; STS-94, Launched July 1, 1997The microgravity environment of the Space Shuttle Columbia was measured during the STS-83 and STS-94 flights of the Microgravity Science Laboratory (MSL-1) mission using four different accelerometer systems: the Orbital Acceleration Research Experiment (OARE), the Space Acceleration Measurement System (SAMS), the Microgravity Measurement Assembly (MMA), and the Quasi-Steady Acceleration Measurement (QSAM) system. All four accelerometer systems provided investigators with acceleration measurements downlinked in near-real-time. Data from each system was recorded for post-mission analysis. The OARE measured the Shuttle's acceleration with high resolution in the quasi-steady frequency regime below about 0.1 Hz. The SAMS provided investigators with higher frequency acceleration measurements up to 25 Hz. The QSAM and MMA systems provided investigators with quasi-steady and higher frequency (up to 100 Hz) acceleration measurements, respectively. The microgravity environment related to various Orbiter maneuvers, crew activities, and experiment operations as measured by the OARE and MMA is presented and interpreted in section 8 of this report.Document ID19980200865Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsMoskowitz, Milton E.*(Tal-Cut Co. North Olmstead, OH United States)*Hrovat, Kenneth*(Tal-Cut Co. North Olmstead, OH United States)*Tschen, Peter*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*McPherson, Kevin*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Nati, Maurizio*(European Space Agency.  European Space Research and Technology Center,== ESTEC Noordwijk,  Netherlands)*Reckart, Timothy A.*(Tal-Cut Co. North Olmstead, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1998Subject CategorySpacecraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberE-11134NASA/TM-1998-206979NAS 1.15:206979NONP-NASA-CD-1998220372Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 963-60-0DDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980200865.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### Stratigraphy and chronology of late interglacial and early Vashon glacial time in the Seattle area, Washington

By: Donal Ray MullineauxHoward Hamilton WaldronMeyer Rubin

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1194O

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3549 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3549

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 210 West 3rd Avenue in Warren, Pennsylvania, as the ``William F. 
                  Clinger, Jr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

     The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 210 
West 3rd Avenue in Warren, Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated 
as the ``William F. Clinger, Jr. Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``William F. Clinger, Jr. Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 18, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3549

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 210 West 3rd Avenue in Warren, Pennsylvania, as the ``William F. 
                  Clinger, Jr. Post Office Building''.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9580 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.9580

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  2777 Brentwood Road in Raleigh, North Carolina, as the ``Millie Dunn 
                          Veasey Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. MILLIE DUNN VEASEY POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2777 Brentwood Road in Raleigh, North Carolina, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Millie Dunn Veasey Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Millie 
Dunn Veasey Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 13.4


Independent Auditors' Report

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
WLR Foods, Inc:

     We have  audited the accompanying consolidated  balance sheets of
WLR  Foods,  Inc.  and subsidiaries as  of June 28,  1997 and June 29,
1996  and   the   related  consolidated   statements  of   operations,
shareholders' equity and cash flows  for  each of the fiscal  years in
the  three-year  period  ended   June  28,  1997.  These  consolidated
financial  statements   are  the   responsibility  of   the  Company's
management. Our responsibility  is  to  express  an  opinion on  these
consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

     We  conducted our  audits in  accordance with  generally accepted
auditing  standards.  Those standards require that we plan and perform
the  audit to obtain reasonable assurance  about whether the financial
statements are  free  of material  misstatement.   An  audit  includes
examining, on  a  test  basis, evidence  supporting  the  amounts  and
disclosures  in the  financial  statements.   An  audit also  includes
assessing the  accounting  principles  used and significant  estimates
made by management,  as  well  as  evaluating  the  overall  financial
statement  presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reason-
able basis for our opinion.

     In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to
above  present  fairly,  in  all   material  respects,  the  financial
position  of WLR Foods, Inc. and subsidiaries  as of June 28, 1997 and
June 29,  1996 and  the results   of their  operations and  their cash
flows  for each of  the fiscal   years in the  three-year period ended
June  28,  1997,  in  conformity with  generally  accepted  accounting
principles.

                         KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP



Richmond, Virginia
August 20, 1997
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

Case No. 5D23-3424 

LT Case No. 35-2009-CF-003430-A 

_____________________________ 

CHRISTOPHER R. DOUGLAS, 

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

_____________________________ 

3.850 appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County. 

Cary Frank Rada, Judge. 

Christopher R. Douglas, Tavares, pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, 

Stephen R. Putnam, Jr., Assistant Attorney 

General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. 

December 26, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a). 

EDWARDS, C.J., EISNAUGLE, and HARRIS, JJ., concur. 
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________