alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BALWANT SINGH,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-73423

A-099-361-176

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 7, 2013**

Portland, Oregon

Before: M. SMITH and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and PRO, Senior District

Judge.

***

Petitioner Balwant Singh (“Singh”) petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the Immigration Judge (“IJ”). 

FILED

NOV 14 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Philip M. Pro, United States District Judge for the

District of Nevada, sitting by designation.
Singh contends the BIA and IJ erred in denying his applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

We review the BIA’s and IJ’s decisions for substantial evidence. Kumar v.

Gonzales, 444 F.3d 1043, 1049 (9th Cir. 2004). We deny the petition for review.

The IJ’s adverse credibility finding was supported by multiple, specific

references to the record where Singh’s testimony contradicted other record

evidence or was evasive and nonresponsive. For example, Singh claimed to have

been beaten by the police and released after his father and neighbors paid a bribe.

However, the affidavits from those who helped secure Singh’s release make no

mention of either Singh’s injuries or the bribe. 

The IJ reasonably denied Singh’s asylum application after finding Singh

failed to submit sufficient evidence to show past persecution on a protected ground

or a well-founded fear of future persecution. The IJ also reasonably found that

Singh’s arrest was part of a legitimate police investigation, not on political

grounds. Additionally, the record evidence was too speculative and generalized to

indicate an individualized risk of future persecution. Because Singh did not

establish eligibility for asylum, he cannot meet the higher burden for withholding

of removal. Dinu v. Ashcroft, 372 F.3d 1041, 1045 (9th Cir. 2004). 

2
Finally, there is insufficient evidence to show that Singh more likely than

not would be tortured if he is removed. Substantial evidence therefore supports the

IJ’s denial of relief under CAT.

PETITION DENIED.

3
§ 884.115 Security and utility deposits. ( a ) An Owner may require Families to pay a security deposit in an amount equal to one month's Gross Family Contribution. If a Family vacates its unit, the Owner, subject to State and local laws, may utilize the deposit as reimbursement for any unpaid rent or other amount owed under the Lease. If the Family has provided a security deposit, and it is insufficient for such reimbursement, the Owner may claim reimbursement from HUD or the PHA, as appropriate, not to exceed an amount equal to the remainder of one month's Contract Rent. Any reimbursement under this section shall be applied first toward any unpaid rent. If a Family vacates the unit owing no rent or other amount under the Lease or if such amount is less than the amount of the security deposit, the Owner shall refund the full amount or the unused balance, as the case may be, to the Family.
( b ) In those jurisdictions where interest is payable by the Owner on security deposits, the refunded amount shall include the amount of interest payable. All security deposit funds shall be deposited by the Owner in a segregated bank account, and the balance of this account, at all times, shall be equal to the total amount collected from tenants then in occupancy, plus any accrued interest. The Owner shall comply with all State and local laws regarding interest payments on security deposits.
( c ) Families shall be expected to obtain the funds to pay security and utility deposits, if required, from their own resources and/or other private or public sources.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Nuniz, Also Known as John Nunez, Appellant.

[832 NYS2d 819]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Collini, J.), rendered April 26, 2004, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts), reckless endangerment in the first degree, and reckless endangerment in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reducing the terms of imprisonment imposed on the convictions of attempted murder in the second degree and both counts of assault in the first degree from 15 years to 13 years; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

As the People correctly concede, the Supreme Court improperly imposed a sentence greater than that which had been agreed upon at the time of the defendant’s plea as a sanction for the defendant’s motion to withdraw the plea. Accordingly, we modify the judgment by reducing the terms of imprisonment imposed on the convictions of attempted murder in the second *880degree and both counts of assault in the first degree to the terms that had originally been negotiated *(see People v Santos,*13 AD3d 258 [2004]).

The issue raised in the defendant’s supplemental pro se brief is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit. Spolzino, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and McCarthy, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         134,302
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  322,727
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (8,463)
<INVENTORY>                                      8,543
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               520,680
<PP&E>                                       1,099,785
<DEPRECIATION>                                (725,384)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 920,616
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          397,676
<BONDS>                                         15,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        71,715
<OTHER-SE>                                     178,761
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   920,616
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               545,648
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  530,848
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   481
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 995
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,319
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,302
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,017
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,017
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29
        

</TABLE>
2017

Stopping Elderly Accidents,

Deaths & Injuries

A Home Fall Prevention 

Checklist for Older Adults 

Check for 

Safety

Centers for Disease 

Control and Prevention

National Center for Injury

Prevention and Control

Contact your local community or senior

center for information on exercise, fall prevention 

programs, or options for improving home safety.

For additional information on fall prevention, visit 

go.usa.gov/xN9XA
FLOORS

When you walk through a room, do you have to 

walk around furniture?

 Ask someone to move the furniture so 

your path is clear.

Do you have throw rugs on the fl oor?

 Remove the rugs, or use double-sided 

tape or a non-slip backing so the rugs 

won’t slip.

Are there papers, shoes, books, or other 

objects on the fl oor?

 Pick up things that are on the fl oor. 

Always keep objects o the fl oor.

Do you have to walk over or around wires or

cords (like lamp, telephone, or extension cords)?

 Coil or tape cords and wires next to the 

wall so you can’t trip over them. If needed, 

have an electrician put in another outlet. 

KITCHEN

Are the things you use often on high shelves?

 Keep things you use often on the lower

shelves (about waist high).

Is your step stool sturdy?

 If you must use a step stool, get one with a bar 

to hold on to. Never use a chair as a step stool.

BEDROOMS

Is the light near the bed hard to reach?

 Place a lamp close to the bed where 

it’s easy to reach.

Is the path from your bed to the bathroom 

dark?

 Put in a nightlight so you can see 

where you’re walking. Some nightlights 

go on by themselves after dark.

BATHROOMS

Is the tub or shower fl oor slippery?

 Put a non-slip rubber mat or self-stick 

strips on the fl oor of the tub or shower.

Do you need some support when you get 

in and out of the tub, or up from the toilet?

 Have grab bars put in next to and 

inside the tub, and next to the toilet.

STAIRS & STEPS 

(INDOORS & OUTDOORS)

Are there papers, shoes, books, or other 

objects on the stairs?

 Always keep objects o the stairs.

Are some steps broken or uneven?

 Fix loose or uneven steps.

Is there a light and light switch at the top and

bottom of the stairs?

 Have an electrician put in an overhead 

light and light switch at the top and 

bottom of the stairs. You can get light 

switches that glow.

Has a stairway light bulb burned out?

 Have a friend or family member change 

the light bulb.

Is the carpet on the steps loose or torn?

 Make sure the carpet is fi rmly attached 

to every step, or remove the carpet and 

attach non-slip rubber treads to the stairs. 

Are the handrails loose or broken? Is there a 

handrail on only one side of the stairs?

 Fix loose handrails, or put in new ones. 

Make sure handrails are on both sides of 

the stairs, and are as long as the stairs.

Use this checklist to fi nd and fi x hazards in your home.
### SUBCHAPTER X—PUNITIVE ARTICLES
#### § 56.19037 Fleet angles.

Fleet angles on hoists installed after November 15, 1979, shall not be greater than one and one-half degrees for smooth drums or two degrees for grooved drums.
#### In the Matter of Joseph Kaplan, Petitioner, v. William S. Hults, as Commissioner of the Bureau of Motor Vehicles of the State of New York, Respondent.

Proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, made June 24, 1960, which suspended for 30 days petitioner’s chauffeur’s license, for persistent violations, pursuant to paragraph (d) of subdivision 3 of section 71 (now § 510) of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. By order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 4,1960, made pursuant to section 1296 of the Civil Practice Act, the proceeding was transferred to this court for determination. Determination of Commissioner of Motor Vehicles.confirmed, without costs. At the hearing before the Referee, petitioner did not question the validity of the convictions. In such case, we prefer not to determine the issue of their validity on this record *(Matter of Hickox*v. *Griffin,*298 N. Y. 365, 371; *United States*v. *Tucker Truck Lines,*344 U. S. 33, 36-37; *Matter of Little Dutch Grill*v. *O’Connell,*119 N. Y. S. 2d 851, affd. 281 App. Div. 901; cf. *Matter of Drasin*v. *Kelly,*6 A D 2d 453, 456). In any event, if we were to consider the merits of this proceeding, we would hold that the summonses served upon petitioner complied with the requirements of section 335-a of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and, consequently, the convictions based thereon are valid. We would further hold that, apart from these convictions, petitioner’s admissions at the hearing as to his traffic law violations constitute sufficient basis for the Commissioner’s determination (Ma*tter of Drasin*v. *Kelly,*6 A D 2d 453, 456-457, *supra;*see, also, *940
      *Matter of Ross*v. *Macduff,*309 N. Y. 56; cf. *Matter of De Lynn*v. *Macduff,*305 N. Y. 501, 505-506). Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
### [§111. Repealed. Pub. L. 112–141, div. E, title II, §52011(c)(1), July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 895]

Section, added Pub. L. 102–240, title VI, §6006(a), Dec. 18, 1991, 105 Stat. 2172; amended Pub. L. 104–287, §5(2), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3389; Pub. L. 104–324, title XI, §1131, Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3985; Pub. L. 105–130, §4(b)(1), Dec. 1, 1997, 111 Stat. 2556; Pub. L. 105–178, title V, §5109(a), June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 437; Pub. L. 108–426, §3(a), (b), Nov. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2424, 2425; Pub. L. 109–59, title V, §5601(a), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1833, established the Bureau of Transportation Statistics. See chapter 63 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 2012, see section 3(a) of Pub. L. 112–141, set out as an Effective and Termination Dates of 2012 Amendment note under section 101 of Title 23, Highways.
#### §§ 585.310-585.314 [Reserved]
§ 50.40 Maintenance of records. ( a ) Each operator of a mine shall maintain a copy of each investigation report required to be prepared under § 50.11 at the mine office closest to the mine for five years after the concurrence.
( b ) Each operator shall maintain a copy of each report submitted under § 50.20 or § 50.30 at the mine office closest to the mine for five years after submission. Upon request by the Mine Safety and Health Administration, an operator shall make a copy of any report submitted under § 50.20 or § 50.30 available to MSHA for inspection or copying.
[42 FR 65535, Dec. 30, 1977, as amended at 43 FR 12318, Mar. 24, 1978]
Exhibit 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Adar Azancot, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Rada Electronic Industries
Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. Date: June 30, 2003


/s/ Adar Azancot *
-----------------------
Adar Azancot
-----------------------
Chief Executive Officer

*     The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at
      the Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon
      request.
#### KENWORTHY v. DYER et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

*1131February 10, 1905.)

Action by Robert J. Ken-worthy, as executor, against Harry L. Dyer and others. W. B. Brice and W. J. McKim, for appellants Harry L. Dyer and others. R. G. Ditworth and H. W. Sackett, for respondents Louis L. Dyer and others. O. H. Luscomb, for respondent Kenworthy. No opinion. Appeal from decision dismissed. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### § 971.1 Purpose.

Section 202 of the Omnibus Consolidated Rescissions and Appropriations Act of 1996 (Pub.L. 104-134, approved April 26, 1996) (“OCRA”) requires PHAs to identify certain distressed public housing developments that cost more than Section 8 rental assistance and cannot be reasonably revitalized. Households in occupancy that will be affected by the activities will be offered tenant-based or project-based assistance (that can include other public housing units) and will be relocated, to other decent, safe, sanitary, and affordable housing which is, to the maximum extent practicable, housing of their choice. After residents are relocated, the distressed developments (or affected buildings) for which no reasonable means of revitalization exists will be removed from the public housing inventory.
#### § 57.7803 Lighting the burner.

A suitable means of protection shall be provided for the employee when lighting the burner.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited financial statements dated June 30, 1999 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,071,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,251,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                1,152,0000
<INVENTORY>                                 22,629,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            49,809,000
<PP&E>                                      24,769,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,010,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              65,088,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       53,889,000
<BONDS>                                      1,860,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        56,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,680,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                     28,737,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,737,000
<CGS>                                       25,980,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,915,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          (13,788,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,376,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,353,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (11,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,191,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,191,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.65


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 11281]

In accordance with sections 1754 (c) and 1768(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (50 U.S.C. 4813(c) and 4826(c)), I hereby rescind the Determination of August 12, 1993, regarding Sudan, effective December 14, 2020. This action is based upon the considerations contained in the memorandum accompanying the Presidential Report of October 26, 2020, regarding Sudan.

This rescission shall also satisfy the provisions of section 620A(c) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371(c)), and section 40(f) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2780(f), and, to the extent applicable, section 6(j) of the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2405(j)), and as continued in effect by Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001).

                    This notice shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: December 8, 2020.

Michael Pompeo,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2020-27848 Filed 12-17-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.604 Hydrogen sulfide.

When a well-workover operation is conducted in zones known to contain hydrogen sulfide (H2S) or in zones where the presence of H2S is unknown (as defined in § 250.490 of this part), the lessee shall take appropriate precautions to protect life and property on the platform or rig, including but not limited to operations such as blowing the well down, dismantling wellhead equipment and flow lines, circulating the well, swabbing, and pulling tubing, pumps and packers. The lessee shall comply with the requirements in § 250.490 of this part as well as the appropriate requirements of this subpart.