alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q FOR
THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN IT'S ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      50,111,941
<SECURITIES>                                24,335,822
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,254,262
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            76,080,109
<PP&E>                                       1,208,833
<DEPRECIATION>                                 210,381
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              77,176,460
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,780,315
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,585
<OTHER-SE>                                  73,022,744
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                77,176,460
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,658,089
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,160,899)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,160,899)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,160,899)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 570.5 Complaint. ( a ) Whenever any person believes that he or she has been denied a contract or subcontract to which this part applies on the grounds of race, creed, color, national origin, or sex, such person may complain of such denial or withholding to the Regional Director of the OCS Region in which such action is alleged to have occurred. Any complaint filed under this part must be submitted in writing to the appropriate Regional Director not later than 180 days after the date of the alleged unlawful denial of a contract or subcontract which is the basis of the complaint.
( b ) The complaint referred to in paragraph (a) of this section shall be accompanied by such evidence as may be available to a person and which is relevant to the complaint including affidavits and other documents.
( c ) Whenever any person files a complaint under this part, the Regional Director with whom such complaint is filed shall give written notice of such filing to all persons cited in the complaint no later than 10 days after receipt of such complaint. Such notice shall include a statement describing the alleged incident of discrimination, including the date and the names of persons involved in it.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7919
LACY JERVAY TATE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHNATHON A. HART; DEBRORAH CROWDER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:06-ct-03067-H) Submitted: April 11, 2007 Decided: May 25, 2007 Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lacy Jervay Tate, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Lacy Jervay Tate, a North Carolina pre-trial detainee, seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action without prejudice. The notice of appeal was received in the district court shortly after the expiration of the appeal period. Because Tate is incarcerated, the notice is considered filed as of the date it was properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988). The record does not conclusively reveal when Tate gave the notice of appeal to prison officials for mailing. Accordingly, we remand the case for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to obtain this information from the parties and to determine whether the filing was timely under Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) and Houston v. Lack . The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.

REMANDED
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

 

FORM 11-K

 

(Mark One)

 

x  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES 

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007

 

OR

 

o  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from            to           

 

Commission file number 0-15279

 

A.        Full title of the plan and the address of the plan, if different from that of the issuer named below:

 

GENERAL COMMUNICATION, INC.

QUALIFIED EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

 

| B. | Name of issuer of the securities held pursuant to the plan and the address of its principal executive office: |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

GENERAL COMMUNICATION, INC.

2550 Denali Street, Suite 1000

Anchorage, Alaska  99503

 

1

 

----
#### In the Matter of Thomas S. Merrill et al., Appellants, against Frederick R. Jagger, Jr., et al., Constituting the Town Board of Zoning and Appeals of the Town of Southampton, Respondents, and Sadie Penny, Intervenor-Respondent.

Motion by intervenor-respondent to dismiss appeal granted by default, with $10 costs, and appeal dismissed. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 6, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-11328 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE NAVARRETE-FIERRO, also known as Jose Luis Fierro, also known as Ricardo Navarro, also known as Jose Luis Navarrete, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:06-CR-23-1

-------------------- Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose NavarreteFierro (Navarrete) raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. Navarrete also raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Mejia-Huerta , 480 F.3d 713, 723 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed , 75 U.S.L.W. 3585 (U.S. Apr. 18, 2007) (No. 06-1381), which held that theNo. 06-11328 -2- district court is not required to provide notice prior to sentencing of its sua sponte intention to impose a non-Guidelines
sentence. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Stephen E. Sterrett, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Simon Property Group, L.P.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date:    August 14, 2003 |  |                                                                                                                                                
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  | /s/ Stephen E. SterrettStephen E. Sterrett
Chief Financial Officer
of Simon Property Group, Inc.,
General Partner of Simon Property Group, L.P.

28

---

QuickLinks
### §§1071 to 1074. Repealed. Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §53, 70A Stat. 641

Section 1071, act July 9, 1952, ch. 608, pt. V, §501, 66 Stat. 500, prescribed composition of Naval Militia. See section 7851 of Title 10, Armed Forces.

Section 1072, act July 9, 1952, ch. 608, pt. V, §502, 66 Stat. 500, provided for appointment and enlistment of militia members in Naval Reserve or Marine Corps Reserve. See section 7852 of Title 10.

Section 1073, act July 9, 1952, ch. 608, pt. V, §503, 66 Stat. 500, provided for release from militia duty upon order to active duty in service of United States. See section 7853 of Title 10.

Section 1074, act July 9, 1952, ch. 608, pt. V, §504, 66 Stat. 500, related to availability of supplies and equipment. See section 7854 of Title 10.
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
18 U.S.C. §1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Annual
Report of White Knight Resources Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F/A for the
period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Annual Report), I, John M. Leask, Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The
Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
               of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The
information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Dated:    February 23, 2006 | Signed:   
John M. Leask
                   John M. Leask
                   Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
18 U.S.C. §1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Annual
Report of White Knight Resources Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F/A for the
period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Annual Report), I, Megan Cameron-Jones, Chief Financial
Officer, Corporate Secretary and a Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The
Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
               of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The
information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Dated:    February 23, 2006 | Signed:   
Megan Cameron-Jones
                  Megan Cameron-Jones
                 
Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Secretary and Director
|--------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
### SUBCHAPTER II—EXPANSION OF PRODUCTIVE CAPACITY AND SUPPLY

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Title III of the Defense Production Act of 1950, comprising this subchapter, was originally enacted as part of act Sept. 8, 1950, ch. 932, 64 Stat. 798, and amended by acts June 2, 1951, ch. 121, 65 Stat. 52; July 31, 1951, ch. 275, 65 Stat. 131; June 30, 1952, ch. 530, 66 Stat. 296; June 30, 1953, ch. 171, 67 Stat. 129; Aug. 9, 1955, ch. 655, 69 Stat. 580; June 29, 1956, ch. 474, 70 Stat. 408; Pub. L. 86–560, June 30, 1960, 74 Stat. 282; Pub. L. 88–343, June 30, 1964, 78 Stat. 235; Pub. L. 91–379, Aug. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 796; Pub. L. 92–325, June 30, 1972, 86 Stat. 390; Pub. L. 93–155, Nov. 16, 1973, 87 Stat. 605; Pub. L. 93–426, Sept. 30, 1974, 88 Stat. 1166; Pub. L. 94–273, Apr. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 375; Pub. L. 96–41, July 30, 1979, 93 Stat. 319; Pub. L. 96–294, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 611; Pub. L. 98–265, Apr. 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 149; Pub. L. 99–441, Oct. 3, 1986, 100 Stat. 1117; Pub. L. 102–558, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4198; Pub. L. 107–47, Oct. 5, 2001, 115 Stat. 260; Pub. L. 107–314, Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2458. Title III is shown here, however, as having been added by Pub. L. 111–67, §7, Sept. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 2010, without reference to the intervening amendments because of the extensive revision of the title's provisions by Pub. L. 111–67.
AUTHORIZATION

        Know all by these presents, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and
appoints each of John M. Lowber, Bonnie J. Paskvan, and Alfred J. Walker,
signing singly, the undersigned's true and lawful attorney-in-fact to:

(1) execute for and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned's capacity
as an affiliate of General Communication, Inc. (the "Company"), Form 4, in
accordance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
rules thereunder;

(2) do and perform any and all acts for and on behalf of the undersigned which
may be necessary or desirable to complete and execute any such Form 4, complete
and execute any amendment or amendments thereto, and timely file such form with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any stock exchange or
similar authority; and

(3) take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the
foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit to,
in the best interest of, or legally required by, the undersigned, it being
understood that the documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on behalf of the
undersigned pursuant to this Power of Attorney shall be in such form and shall
contain such terms and conditions as such attorney-in-fact may approve in such
attorney-in-fact's discretion.

        The undersigned hereby grants to each such attorney-in-fact full power
and authority to do and perform any and every act and thing whatsoever
requisite, necessary, or proper to be done in the exercise of any of the rights
and powers herein granted, as fully to all intents and purposes as the
undersigned might or could do if personally present, with full power of
substitution or revocation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such
attorney-in-fact, or such attorney-in-fact's substitute or substitutes, shall
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this power of attorney and the
rights and powers herein granted. The undersigned acknowledges that the
foregoing attorneys-in-fact, in serving in such capacity at the request of the
undersigned, are not assuming, nor is the Company assuming, any of the
undersigned's responsibilities to comply with Section 16 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.

        This Power of Attorney shall remain in full force and effect until the
undersigned is no longer required to file Form 4, with respect to the
undersigned's holdings of and transactions in securities issued by the Company,
unless earlier revoked by the undersigned in a signed writing delivered to the
foregoing attorneys-in-fact.


                                   1
<PAGE>
        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Power of Attorney to
be executed as of this 27th day of December 2004.


                                 /s/
                                 ------------------------
                                 Signature


                                 Donne F. Fisher
                                 ------------------------
                                 Print Name
§ 57.14131 Seat belts for surface haulage trucks. ( a ) Seat belts shall be provided and worn in haulage trucks.
( b ) Seat belts shall be maintained in functional condition, and replaced when necessary to assure proper performance.
( c ) Seat belts required under this section shall meet the requirements of SAE J386, “Operator Restraint System for Off-Road Work Machines” (1985, 1993, or 1997), which are incorporated by reference.
( d ) The incorporation by reference of these publications is approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies of these publications may be examined at any Metal and Nonmetal Mine Safety and Health District Office; at MSHA's Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances, 201 12th Street South, Arlington, VA 22202-5452; 202-693-9440; or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .* Copies may be purchased from the Society of Automotive Engineers, 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001; 724-776-4841; *http://www.sae.org .*
[53 FR 32528, Aug. 25, 1988, as amended at 67 FR 38385, June 4, 2002; 68 FR 19347, Apr. 21, 2003; 80 FR 52988, Sept. 2, 2015]
#### § 56.19067 Trips during shift changes.

During shift changes, an authorized person shall be in charge of each trip in which persons are hoisted.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

September 23, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00427

- CV

IN RE Gustavo GARCIA

- SILLER , Archbishop of the Archdiocese of San Antonio, and Acting on Behalf of the Archdiocese of San Antonio, and Anita Valencia, as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Virgilio Elizondo

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

On August 31, 2020, relators, Gustavo Garcia

- Siller, Archbishop of the Archdiocese of San Antonio, and Acting on Behalf of the Archdiocese of San Antonio, and Anita Valencia, as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Virgilio Elizondo, filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After consideration , the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

It is so ORDERED on September 2 3, 2020

.

_____________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 23rd day of September, 2020

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz , Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2015

- CI

- 08589 , styled John Doe v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Antonio, by and through the Apostolic Administrator and Archbishop Gustavo Garcia

- Siller and Archbishop Emeritus Patrick Flores, their predecessors and successors, as Archbishop of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Antonio, Father Jesus Armando Dominguez, the Estate of Father Virgilio Elizondo, Deceased; Bishop Gerald R. Barnes, his predecessors and successors, as Bishop of the Diocese of San Bern ardino, in its assumed or common name; the Roman Catholic Bishop of San Bernardino, a Corporate sole aka Diocese of San Bernardino , pending in the 131st Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Karen H. Pozza presiding.
§ 44.4 Standard of evaluation of petitions; effect of petitions granted. ( a ) A petition for modification of application of a mandatory safety standard may be granted upon a determination that— ( 1 ) An alternative method of achieving the result of the standard exists that will at all times guarantee no less than the same measure of protection afforded by the standard, or
( 2 ) Application of the standard will result in a diminution of safety to the miners.
( b ) Except as may be provided in § 44.16 for relief to give effect to a proposed decision and order, a decision of an Administrator or an administrative law judge granting or denying a petition for modification shall not be effective until time for appeal has expired under § 44.14 or § 44.33, as appropriate.
( c ) All petitions for modification granted pursuant to this part shall have only future effect: *Provided,* That the granting of the modification under this part shall be considered as a factor in the resolution of any enforcement action previously initiated for claimed violation of the subsequently modified mandatory safety standard. Orders granting petitions for modification may contain special terms and conditions to assure adequate protection to miners. The modification, together with any conditions, shall have the same effect as a mandatory safety standard.
[43 FR 29518, July 7, 1978, as amended at 55 FR 53440, Dec. 28, 1990]