alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 11-1

               DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES

                   Computation of Diluted Earnings Per Share
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    Three Months Ended
                                                                        March 31,
                                                                     1998       1997
                                                                   --------   --------
<S>                                                                <C>        <C>  
Weighted Average Common Shares (1):
     Average Common Shares Outstanding .........................    114,972    108,100
     Average Restricted Stock Units Outstanding ................      3,682      8,658
     Average Common Shares Issuable Under Employee Benefit Plans     10,140      4,218
                                                                   --------   --------

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding .....................    128,794    120,976
                                                                   ========   ========

Earnings:
     Net Income ................................................   $134,150   $ 86,400
     Less:  Preferred Stock Dividend Requirement ...............      5,443      3,234
                                                                   --------   --------

Earnings Applicable to Common Shares ...........................   $128,707   $ 83,166
                                                                   ========   ========


Diluted Earnings Per Common Share ..............................   $   1.00   $   0.69
                                                                   ========   ========
</TABLE>


(1)   In February 1998, the Board of Directors declared a two-for-one stock
      split (the "stock split") of the Company's common stock, subject to
      stockholder approval, to increase the number of authorized common shares.
      In April 1998, the stockholders approved an amendment to the Company's
      Certificate of Incorporation whereby the amount of total authorized
      shares of common stock was increased to 300 million shares and the amount
      of total authorized shares of preferred stock was increased to 50
      million. The stock split was effected in the form of a 100% stock
      dividend to stockholders of record on April 27, 1998, and was paid on May
      11, 1998. All common share, per common share, restricted stock unit and
      option data have been restated for the effect of the stock split.

                                      27
<PAGE>   1
Deposit Guaranty Corp.
Jackson, Mississippi

Gentlemen:

RE:  March 31, 1997 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

With respect to the subject Quarterly Report, we acknowledge our awareness of
the use therein of our report dated April 15,1997 related to our review of
interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act, such report is not considered
a part of a Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a
report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7
and 11 of the Act.



                                                    Very truly yours,

                                                    /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
                                                    -------------------------
                                                    KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


Jackson, Mississippi
May 15, 1997







                                      17
#### § 586.115 Paperwork Reduction Act statements—information collection.

(a) The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information collection requirements in this part under 44 U.S.C. 3501, *et seq.,* and assigned OMB Control Number 1010-0176. The table in paragraph (e) of this section lists the subparts in the rule requiring the information and its title, summarizes the reasons for collecting the information, and summarizes how BOEM uses the information.

(b) Respondents are primarily Alternate Use RUE grant holders and operators. The requirement to respond to the information collection in this part is mandated under subsection 8(p) of the OCS Lands Act. Some responses are also required to obtain or retain a benefit, or may be voluntary.

(c) The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*) requires us to inform the public that an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and you are not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

(d) Comments regarding any aspect of the collections of information under this part, including suggestions for reducing the burden, should be sent to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, 45600 Woodland Road, Sterling, VA 20166.

(e) BOEM is collecting this information for the reasons given in the following table:

| 30 CFR 586 subpart and title | Reasons for collecting information and how used |
| --- | --- |
| (1) Subpart A—General Provisions | To inform BOEM of actions taken to comply with general operational requirements on the OCS. To ensure that operations on the OCS meet statutory and regulatory requirements, are safe and protect the environment, and result in diligent development on OCS leases. |
| (2) Subpart B—Issuance of Alternate Use RUEs for Energy- and Marine-Related Activities Using Existing OCS Facilities | To enable BOEM to review information regarding the design, installation, and operation of Alternate Use RUEs on the OCS, to ensure that Alternate Use RUE operations are safe and protect the human, marine, and coastal environment. To ensure adherence with other Federal laws, these regulations, the Alternate Use RUE grant, and, where applicable, the approved plan. |
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 11-13

                               DTE ENERGY COMPANY
                      BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                 OF COMMON STOCK


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                      Three Months            Nine Months
                                                          Ended                   Ended
                                                   September 30, 1998      September 30, 1998
                                                   ------------------      ------------------
                                                      (Thousands, except per share amounts)

<S>                                                  <C>                      <C>
BASIC:
     Net Income......................................$  132,037               $   336,637
     Weighted average number of common
       shares outstanding (a)........................   145,075                   145,078
     Earnings per share of Common Stock
       based on weighted average number
       of shares outstanding.........................$     0.91               $      2.32

DILUTED:
     Net Income......................................$  132,037               $   336,637

     Weighted average number of common
       shares outstanding (a)........................   145,075                   145,078
     Incremental shares from assumed exercise
       of options....................................       116                        95
                                                     ----------               -----------
                                                        145,191                   145,173
                                                     ==========               ===========

     Earnings per share of Common Stock
       assuming exercise of options..................$    0.91                $      2.32
</TABLE>

------------------------------------------------------
(a)      Based on a daily average.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                   400,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               404,323
<PP&E>                                       2,157,927
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,348,567
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,213,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       250,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     963,683
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,213,683
<SALES>                                         31,030
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,030
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,707
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (677)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (677)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (677)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
### §225. Repealed. Pub. L. 85–296, Sept. 4, 1957, 71 Stat. 617

Section, act June 6, 1924, ch. 272, §2, 43 Stat. 465, related to escapement in certain instances of portion of salmon run in waters of Alaska.
§ 48.12 Appeals procedures. The operator, miner, and miners' representative shall have the right of appeal from a decision of the District Manager. ( a ) In the event an operator, miner, or miners' representative decides to appeal a decision by a District Manager, such an appeal shall be submitted, in writing, to the Administrator for Coal Mine Safety and Health or the Administrator for Metal and Nonmetal Mine Safety and Health, as appropriate, MSHA, 201 12th Street South, Arlington, VA 22202-5452, within 30 days of notification of the District Manager's decision.
( b ) The Administrator may require additional information from the operator, the miners, or their representatives, and the District Manager, if the Administrator determines such information is necessary.
( c ) The Administrator shall render a decision on the appeal within 30 days after receipt of the appeal.
[43 FR 47459, Oct. 13, 1978, as amended at 47 FR 23640, May 28, 1982; 71 FR 16666, Apr. 3, 2006; 80 FR 52986, Sept. 2, 2015]
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Keith Johnson

Berdon, J., dissenting. I would grant the defendant’s petition for certification.

*Gregory T. D’Auria*and *James W. Bergenn,*in support of the petition.

*Marjorie Allen Dauster,*deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided September 25, 1992

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 28 Conn. App. 645, is denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 15-20



May 14, 2002

The Detroit Edison Company
Detroit, Michigan

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of The Detroit Edison Company and subsidiaries for the periods ended
March 31, 2002 and 2001, as indicated in our report dated April 23, 2002;
because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-63366 on Form S-3.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



Deloitte & Touche LLP
Detroit, Michigan
Major Structures:

1. Primary alcohols:

H3C-(CH2)X- OH, where: X= 21 and 23 (predominantly)

2. Esters: 

R-C(O)OR', where: R and R' are the predominant even numbered carbon chains indicated 

below:

Total Carbon number (R-C(O)OR') R R'

C32 12-20 12-20

C34 12-22 12-22

C36 12-22 14-24

C38 12-22 16-26

C40 16-24 16-24

C42 18-24 18-24

C44 22-24 20-22

C46 22 24
§ 550.1406 When will BOEM notify me and provide penalty information? If the Reviewing Officer determines that a civil penalty should be assessed, the Reviewing Officer will send the violator a letter of notification. The letter of notification will include: ( a ) The amount of the proposed civil penalty;
( b ) Information on the violation(s); and
( c ) Instruction on how to obtain a copy of the case file, schedule a meeting, submit information, or pay the penalty.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME, BALANCE SHEET, STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS,
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY AND BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER
SHARE OF COMMON STOCK AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000936340
<NAME> DTE ENERGY COMPANY

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             172
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      777
<ALLOWANCES>                                        21
<INVENTORY>                                        331
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,505
<PP&E>                                          12,935
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,632
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,517
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,875
<BONDS>                                          3,992
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,918
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,999
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,517
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,610
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,192
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     3
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 165
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    250
<INCOME-TAX>                                        25
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                225
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       225
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.57


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9459 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9459

    To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to enable secure and 
trustworthy technology through other transaction contracting authority, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 6, 2024

  Mr. Guest (for himself and Mr. Ivey) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to enable secure and 
trustworthy technology through other transaction contracting authority, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Producing Advanced Technologies for 
Homeland Security Act'' or the ``PATHS Act''.

SEC. 2. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ACQUISITION PILOT PROGRAM EXTENSION.

    (a) In General.--Section 831 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 
(6 U.S.C. 391) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by 
                striking ``Until September 30, 2024, and subject to 
                subsection (d)'' and inserting ``Until September 30, 
                2027, and subject to subsection (c)''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following new 
                paragraph:
            ``(3) Other transaction authority involving artificial 
        intelligence.--Not later than 72 hours after the use or 
        extension of the transaction authority authorized under 
        paragraph (1) involving artificial intelligence technology, the 
        Secretary shall notify the Committee on Appropriations and the 
        Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the 
        Senate and the Committee on Appropriations and the Committee on 
        Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and offer a 
        briefing explaining the reason for the use or extension.''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)(1), in the matter preceding 
        subparagraph (A), by striking ``September 30, 2024'' and 
        inserting ``September 30, 2027''.
    (b) Reduction in Amount of Covered Contract Award.--Subparagraph 
(A) of section 7113(d)(1) of the James M. Inhofe National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 (6 U.S.C. 112 note; Public Law 
117-263) is amended by striking ``$4,000,000'' and inserting 
``$1,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert R. Greil, Appellant.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied and time for argument of appeal enlarged to include September 1962 Term.
EXHIBIT 13.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Annual Report of Levon Resources Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Ron Tremblay, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: October 14, 2011
By:
/s/ Ron TremblayRon Tremblay, Principal Executive Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the annual report or as a separate disclosure document.
1 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. -1- United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 17, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________________ No. 03 - 60614 SUMMARY CALENDAR

_________________________ OSCAR ROLENDIO ANZUETO-VELIZ,

Petitioner,

v. JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

______________________________________________________________________________ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A78 321 975

______________________________________________________________________________ Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 In this appeal, we review the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision affirming the immigration judge’s denial of Oscar Rolendio Anzueto-Veliz’s requests for asylum and withholding of removal. An alien must file an application for asylum within one year of his arrival in the United States. 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(B). Anzueto-Veliz does not challenge the immigration judge’s-2-

finding that he failed to file his application within one year of his arrival. Thus, he has waived his claim for asylum. See Rodriguez v. INS , 9 F.3d 408, 414 n.15 (5 th Cir. 1993). We also conclude that the immigration judge’s decision denying withholding of removal was supported by substantial evidence. Anzueto-Veliz alleges that he got into a fight with gang members in Guatemala because he refused to join their gang; however, he admits that he had no further direct contact with any gang members after the initial altercation. Anzueto-Veliz merely alleges that he left Guatemala because the gang members continued to inquire about his whereabouts after he had moved several times within Guatemala. Anzueto-Veliz’s isolated encounter with gang members did not constitute persecution and was not indicative of the likelihood of future persecution upon his return to Guatemala. See Efe v. Aschcroft , 293 F.3d 899, 906 (5 th Cir. 2002); Chun v. INS , 40 F.3d 76, 78 (5 th Cir. 1994). Anzueto-Veliz’s petition for review is therefore denied.