alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM COMMODORE
SEPARATION  TECHNOLOGIES,  INC.  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                        JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                      222
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                59
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            281
<PP&E>                                                    1,601
<DEPRECIATION>                                            1,575
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              462
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     1,832
<BONDS>                                                   1,224
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   1
<COMMON>                                                     11
<OTHER-SE>                                               10,496
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                462
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             67
<CGS>                                                        94
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             1,756
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (1,689)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (1,689)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (1,689)
<EPS-BASIC>                                               (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (0.15)


</TABLE>
### **CHAPTER 5—OFFICIAL TERRITORIAL PAPERS**

Sec.
141.
Collection, preparation and publication.
142.
Appointment of experts.
143.
Employment and utilization of other personnel; cost of copy reading and indexing.
144.
Cooperation of departments and agencies.
145.
Printing and distribution.
146.
Authorization of appropriations.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1951**—Chapter added by act Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, §12, 65 Stat. 713.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Similar Provisions; Repeal; Saving Clause; Delegation of Functions; Transfer of Property and Personnel

Similar provisions were contained in former chapter 5, comprising former sections 141 to 146, which was set out here but which was not a part of this title. Former sections 141 to 146 were derived from: acts Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 419, §§1, 2, 43 Stat. 1104; Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 419, §§3, 4, as added Feb. 28, 1929, ch. 385, 45 Stat. 1412, 1413; Feb. 28, 1929, ch. 385, 45 Stat. 1412 (in addition to the provisions added to said act Mar. 3, 1925); Mar. 22, 1935, ch. 39, §1 (part), 49 Stat. 69; Feb. 14, 1936, ch. 70, 49 Stat. 1139; May 15, 1936, ch. 405, §1 (part), 49 Stat. 1311; June 16, 1937, ch. 359, §1 (part), 50 Stat. 262, 263; June 28, 1937, ch. 386, 50 Stat. 323, 324; Apr. 27, 1938, ch. 180, §1 (part), 52 Stat. 249; June 29, 1939, ch. 248, title I (part), 53 Stat. 886; July 31, 1945, ch. 336, 59 Stat. 510, 511; 1946 Proc. No. 2714, Dec. 31, 1946, 12 F.R. 1; act Oct. 28, 1949, ch. 782, title XI, §1106(a), 63 Stat. 972; 1950 Reorg. Plan No. 20, §1, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3178, 64 Stat. 1272; act July 7, 1950, ch. 452, 64 Stat. 320. All of the foregoing provisions, with the exception of 1946 Proc. No. 2714, act Oct. 28, 1949, §1106(a), and 1950 Reorg. Plan No. 20, §1, were repealed by act Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, §56(k)(1)–(11), 65 Stat. 730. Subsec. (l) of section 56 provided that the repeal should not affect any rights or liabilities existing under the repealed statutes on the effective date of the repeal (Oct. 31, 1951). For delegation of functions under the repealed statutes, and for transfer of records, property, personnel, and funds, see sections 3 and 4 of said 1950 Reorg. Plan No. 20, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       5,436,013
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               23,036,151
<ALLOWANCES>                                   325,400
<INVENTORY>                                 32,384,557
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            64,554,922
<PP&E>                                      28,539,828
<DEPRECIATION>                              16,883,323
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              85,164,265
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       21,346,728
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    34,934,394
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,655,008
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                85,164,265
<SALES>                                     34,463,093
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            34,465,469
<CGS>                                       23,108,374
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               32,171,838
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,063,464
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             816,831
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,499,845
<INCOME-TAX>                                   434,955
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,064,890
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>
#### § 585.615 What other reports or notices must I submit to BOEM under my approved SAP?

You must prepare and submit to BOEM a report annually on November 1st of each year that summarizes your site assessment activities and the results of those activities. BOEM will withhold trade secrets and commercial or financial information that is privileged or confidential from public disclosure under exemption 4 of the FOIA and as provided in § 585.114.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                             212
<SECURITIES>                                       503
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1404
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (25)
<INVENTORY>                                        497
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                            1665
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (893)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    4917
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                           1055
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        244
<COMMON>                                          2133
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1414)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      4917
<SALES>                                           4259
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4433
<CGS>                                             3688
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4304
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   158
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     8
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  57
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    129
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (49)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 80
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        80
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.80
<FN>
<F1>The company has adopted an unclassified presentation in the Statement of
Financial Condition.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 7299** 

MAURICE PATRICK FORTUNE, III , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. MARK R. HERRING , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Liam O’Grady , District Judge. ( 1:16

- cv - 00586

- LO

- TCB )

Submitted : February 22, 2017 Decided: February 28, 2017

Before KING, AGEE, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Maurice Patrick Fortune, III, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Maurice Patrick Fortune seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012)
pe tition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debata ble or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is d ebatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
Fortune has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny the motion for a transcript at government
expense and for a stay, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are3 adequately pre sented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
### UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGIONS 1595 Wynkoop Street DENVER, CO 80202-1129 Phone 800-227-8917 http://www.epa.gov/region08 

### AUG - 1 2012 Ref: 8P-AR CERTIFIED MAIL

- RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED & ELECTRONIC MAIL Jennifer Head Regulatory Team Lead WPX Energy Williston, LLC 1001 17th Street, Suite 1200 Denver, Colorado 80202 RE: Actual Notice for Approval and Promulgation of Federal Implementation Plan for Oil andNatural Gas Production Facilities DearMs. Head, This is to notifY you that the EPA has issued a temporary interim final rule promulgating a reservationspecific Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) in orderto regulate emissions from oil andnatural gas production facilities located onthe Fort Berthold Indian Reservation (FBIR). The FIP includes basic air quality regulations for the protection ofcommunities in and adjacent to the FBIR. The FIP requires owners and operators ofoil and natural gas production facilities to reduce emissions ofvolatile organic compounds emanating from well completions, recompletions, andproduction and storage operations. The agency proposed a reservation-specific FIP concurrently with this interim final rule. The rule is effective with this actual notice to WPX Energy Williston, LLC for purposes ofenforcement beginning at 5 p.m. (easterndaylight time) onAugust 3, 2012. We will acceptcomments on the proposed rule for 45 days from the date ofpublication inthe Federal Register. The EPA Administrator, LisaJackson, signedthe interim final rule onAugust 1, 2012, and the agency is submitting it for publication inthe Federal Register (FR).A copy ofthe signed interim final rule is enclosed with this letter. The version ofthe enclosed rule serves as the official version for purposes ofcompliance until the interim final rule is published in the FR. Please referto the published version in a forthcoming FRpublication, which will appear onthe Government Printing Office's FDsys website (http://fdsys.gpo.gov/fdsys/search/home.action) and on Regulations.gov (http://www.regulations.gov) in DocketNo. EPA-R08-0AR-2012-0479. Ifyou have any questions onthe interim final rule, please contact Deirdre Rothery at (303) 312-6431.

# r;y~ Carl Daly, Director Air Program Enclosures

2
#### § 47.52 MSDS contents.

When an operator must prepare an MSDS for a hazardous chemical produced at the mine, the MSDS must—

(a) Be legible, accurate, and in English;

(b) Use a chemical identity that permits cross-referencing between the list of hazardous chemicals, the chemical's label, and its MSDS; and

(c) Contain information, or indicate if no information is available, for the categories listed in Table 47.52 as follows:

| Category | Requirements, descriptions, and exceptions |
| --- | --- |
| (1) Identity | The identity of the chemical or, if the chemical is a mixture, the identities of all hazardous ingredients. *See* § 47.21 (Identifying hazardous chemicals). |
| (2) Properties | The physical and chemical characteristics of the chemical, such as vapor pressure and solubility in water. |
| (3) Physical | The physical hazards of the chemical including the potential for fire, explosion, and reactivity. |
| (4) Health hazards | The health hazards of the chemical including— |
| | (i) Signs and symptoms of exposure, |
| | (ii) Any medical conditions which are generally recognized as being aggravated by exposure to the chemical, and |
| | (iii) The primary routes of entry for the chemical, such as lungs, stomach, or skin. |
| (5) Exposure limits | For the chemical or the ingredients of a mixture— |
| | (i) The MSHA or OSHA permissible limit, if there is one, and |
| | (ii) Any other exposure limit recommended by the preparer of the MSDS. |
| (6) Carcinogenicity | Whether the chemical or an ingredient in the mixture is a carcinogen or potential carcinogen. See the sources specified in § 47.21 (Identifying hazardous chemicals). |
| (7) Safe use | Precautions for safe handling and use including— |
| | (i) Appropriate hygienic practices, |
| | (ii) Protective measures during repair and maintenance of contaminated equipment, and |
| | (iii) Procedures for clean-up of spills and leaks. |
| (8) Control measures | Generally applicable control measures such as engineering controls, work practices, and personal protective equipment. |
| (9) Emergency information | (i) Emergency medical and first-aid procedures; and |
| | (ii) The name, address, and telephone number of the operator or other responsible party who can provide additional information on the hazardous chemical and appropriate emergency procedures. |
| (10) Date prepared | The date the MSDS was prepared or last changed. |

Table 47.52—Contents of MSDS

[67 FR 42383, June 21, 2002; 67 FR 57635, Sept. 11, 2002]
EXHIBIT 15

                     Independent Accountants' Review Report
                     --------------------------------------

The Board of Directors
Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc.



We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of financial
condition of Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30,
2000, and the related condensed consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders' equity and cash flows for the three-month and six-month periods
ended June 30, 2000. These condensed consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is the
expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for
them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
August 11, 2000
#### Pennsylvania Manufacturers’ Association Insurance Company, Respondent, v Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant.

[837 NYS2d 445]—

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph R. Glownia, J.), entered August 28, 2006. The order denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and for costs and disbursements.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is granted in part and the complaint is dismissed.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking recovery of one half of the costs associated with the settlement of the underlying action. Plaintiff issued a policy to Textar Painting Corporation (Textar) that named the New York State Thruway Authority (Authority) as an insured. Defendant issued a policy to KTA-Tator, Inc. (KTA-Tator) that also named the Authority as an insured. The Authority contracted with Textar to clean and paint the structural steel on the South Grand Island Bridge, and it contracted with KTA-Tator to inspect the work performed by Textar. A Textar employee sustained fatal injuries while painting the bridge, and his wife, individually and as administratrix of his estate, commenced the underlying action against the Authority. Plaintiff paid a settlement on the Authority’s behalf and commenced this action, alleging that its policy and defendant’s policy covered the same risk and that plaintiff and defendant therefore were coinsurers.

Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint and for costs and disbursements pursuant to, inter alia, CPLR 3211 (a) (1), on the ground that the two policies insured different risks. “[W]here insurance policies provide coverage for the same interest and against the same risk, concurrent coverage exists and two or more primary insurers will be held to be coinsurers” *(Southgate*
      *1162
      *Owners Corp. v Public Serv. Mut. Ins. Co.,*241 AD2d 397, 398 [1997]; *see National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v Hartford Ins. Co. of Midwest,*248 AD2d 78, 85 [1998], *affd*93 NY2d 983 [1999]; *B.K. Gen. Contrs. v Michigan Mut. Ins. Co.,*204 AD2d 584, 585 [1994]). In this case, plaintiff’s policy provided coverage for the Authority in the event that bodily injury was caused by Textar’s painting operations and for the Authority’s acts or omissions in supervising Textar’s painting operations. Defendant’s policy, on the other hand, provided coverage for the Authority in the event that bodily injury was caused by KTA-Tator’s inspecting operations and for the Authority’s acts or omissions in supervising KTA-Tator’s inspecting operations. Thus, while the two policies provided coverage for the same insured, the policies did not insure the same risk *(see HRH Constr. Corp. v Commercial Underwriters Ins. Co.,*11 AD3d 321, 323 [2004], *lv denied 5*NY3d 705 [2005]). We therefore reverse the order, grant the motion in part and dismiss the complaint. Present—Scudder, P.J., Smith, Centra, Fahey and Pine, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES

                     Computation of Basic Earnings Per Share
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                     Three Months Ended
                                                                         March 31,
                                                                    2000             1999
                                                                    ----             ----
<S>                                                               <C>               <C>
DLJ COMMON STOCK

Weighted Average Common Shares:
   Average Common Shares Outstanding ..................           126,850           123,837
   Average Restricted Stock Units Outstanding .........               158               158
                                                                 --------          --------

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding ............           127,008           123,995
                                                                 ========          ========

Earnings:
    Net Income ........................................          $245,200          $121,650
     Less: Preferred Stock Dividend Requirement .......             5,289             5,289
         Earnings Applicable to Common Shares-DLJdirect             2,437                --
                                                                 --------          --------

Earnings Applicable to Common Shares ..................          $237,474          $116,361
                                                                 ========          ========


Basic Earnings Per Common Share .......................          $   1.87          $   0.94
                                                                 ========          ========

DLJDIRECT COMMON STOCK

Weighted Average Common Shares:
    Average Common Shares Outstanding .................            18,400
                                                                 ========

Earnings Applicable to Common Shares ..................          $  2,437
                                                                 ========

Basic Earnings Per Common Share .......................          $   0.13
                                                                 ========
</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

October 24, 2011

t1017

Order 

October 24, 2011

143356

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143356

COA: 297204 

Jackson CC: 09-060000-FH

MICHAEL LORENZO WHITE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 19, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.