alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **CHAPTER 441—REGISTRATION AND RECORDATION OF AIRCRAFT**

Sec.
44101.
Operation of aircraft.
44102.
Registration requirements.
44103.
Registration of aircraft.
44104.
Registration of aircraft components and dealers' certificates of registration.
44105.
Suspension and revocation of aircraft certificates.
44106.
Revocation of aircraft certificates for controlled substance violations.
44107.
Recordation of conveyances, leases, and security instruments.
44108.
Validity of conveyances, leases, and security instruments.
44109.
Reporting transfer of ownership.
44110.
Information about aircraft ownership and rights.
44111.
Modifications in registration and recordation system for aircraft not providing air transportation.
44112.
Limitation of liability.
44113.
Definitions.
44114.
Privacy.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2024**—Pub. L. 118–63, title VIII, §803(b), May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1322, added item 44114.

**2004**—Pub. L. 108–297, §6(b), Aug. 9, 2004, 118 Stat. 1097, added item 44113.
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.3



                                 AMENDMENT NO. 2
                                     TO THE
                    HYSEQ, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN


        Hyseq, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), hereby adopts this
Amendment No. 2 (this "Amendment") to the Hyseq, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase
Plan (the "Plan"). Capitalized terms used in this Amendment without definition
shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Plan.

               WHEREAS, Section 13 of the Plan currently provides that the Board
of Directors of the Company may amend the Plan;

               WHEREAS, the Company's Board of Directors has determined that it
is in the best interests of the Company to amend the Plan to increase the number
of shares of the Company's Common Stock reserved for issuance under the Plan by
500,000 shares to 750,000 shares.

               NOW, THEREFORE, Section 5 of the Plan is hereby amended to
increase the maximum number of shares of the Company's Common Stock which may be
issued for all purposes under the Plan from 250,000 to 750,000.

        I hereby certify that the foregoing Amendment No. 2 to the Plan was duly
adopted by the Board of Directors of Hyseq, Inc. effective as of November 3,
2002.

        Executed on this 4th day of November, 2002.





                                            /s/ Li Hsien Rin-Laures
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Secretary
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1220 CHARLES V. YOUNG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus K-MART CORPORATION; SUPER K-MART #3785; BILL WRIGHT; JOHN LEMRY; DAVE DAVIS; TERESA ROCKEFELLER, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 96-1221 CHARLES V. YOUNG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus K-MART CORPORATION; SUPER K-MART #3785; BILL WRIGHT; BOB THORPE; SUE POLSTEN; DAVE DAVIS; TERESA ROCKEFELLER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (MISC-95-16-4, MISC-95-17-4) Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 3, 19962* Judge Hall did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). 3 Before HALL, * MICHAEL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles V. Young, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying in forma paup eris status in his suits against his former employer for employment discrimination. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals. Young v. K-Mart Corp. , Nos. MISC-95-16-4; MISC-95-17-4 (E.D. Va. Jan. 5, 1996). See Roberts v. United States District Court , 339 U.S. 844, 845 (1950). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED4
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9571 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9571

  To amend the Animal Welfare Act to include cold-blooded species as 
                    animals, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 2024

 Ms. McCollum introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Animal Welfare Act to include cold-blooded species as 
                    animals, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cold-blooded Animal Research and 
Exhibition Act'' or the ``CARE Act''.

SEC. 2. INCLUDING REPTILES AND FISH AS ANIMALS UNDER ANIMAL WELFARE 
              ACT.

    Section 2(g) of the Animal Welfare Act (7 U.S.C. 2132(g)) is 
amended to read as follows:
    ``(g)(1) The term `animal' means any live or dead warm-blooded 
animal (including a dog, cat, monkey (nonhuman primate mammal), guinea 
pig, hamster, rabbit, or bird), cold-blooded animal (including a 
reptile, amphibian, cephalopod, or fish), or such other animal as the 
Secretary may determine is being used, or is intended for use, for 
research, testing, experimentation, or exhibition purposes, or as a 
pet.
    ``(2) Such term excludes--
            ``(A) birds, rats of the genus Rattus, and mice of the 
        genus Mus, bred for use in research;
            ``(B) horses not used for research purposes; and
            ``(C) other farmed animals, such as--
                    ``(i) livestock, poultry, or fish used or intended 
                for use as food or fiber; or
                    ``(ii) livestock, poultry, or fish used or intended 
                for use for improving animal nutrition, breeding, 
                management, or production efficiency, or for improving 
                the quality of food or fiber.
    ``(3) With respect to a dog, such term means all dogs, including 
those used for hunting, security, or breeding purposes.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 56.9307 Design, installation, and maintenance of railroads.

Roadbeds and all elements of the railroad tracks shall be designed, installed, and maintained to provide safe operation consistent with the speed and type of haulage used.
### SUBCHAPTER III—CONTROL AND DISPOSITION OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AND RELATED MATERIALS THREATENING THE UNITED STATES
EXHIBIT 99.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

     Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  each of
the undersigned  officers of Brilliant Digital  Entertainment,  Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify with respect to Amendment No. 1
to the  Quarterly  Report of the Company on Form  10-QSB for the  quarter  ended
March  31,  2002 as filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the
"10-QSB/A Report") that:

     (1)  the 10-QSB/A  Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information  contained in the 10-QSB/A Report fairly presents,  in
          all  material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
          operations of the Company.





Date:  February 28, 2003                    /s/ KEVIN BERMEISTER
                                            -------------------------------
                                               Kevin Bermeister
                                               President and
                                               Chief Executive Officer






Date:  February 28, 2002                    /s/ ROBERT CHMIEL
                                            ------------------------------
                                               Robert Chmiel
                                               Chief Financial Officer and
                                               Chief Operating Officer
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit 

___________________________

No. 20-2822

___________________________ 

United States of America

 Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Todd Stands Alone, formerly known as Todd Brave Crow

 Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of South Dakota - Northern

____________ 

Submitted: June 18, 2021

Filed: July 20, 2021 

[Unpublished]

____________ 

Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM. 

After Todd Stands Alone violated the conditions of supervised release, the 

district court1 sentenced him to 14 months in prison. On appeal, he challenges the 

length of the sentence. 

1

The Honorable Charles B. Kornmann, United States District Judge for the 

District of South Dakota.
-2- 

As Stands Alone acknowledges, his recent release from prison moots the

appeal. See Owen v. United States, 930 F.3d 989, 990 (8th Cir. 2019) (holding that 

release will moot an appeal when the appellant “challenge[s] only his term of 

imprisonment”). No remedy is available to shorten a term of imprisonment that he

has already served, and no one has identified any collateral consequences. See id.; 

see also United States v. Dunlap, 719 F.3d 865, 866–68 (8th Cir. 2013) (per curiam)

(dismissing an appeal as moot under similar circumstances). We accordingly 

dismiss the appeal. 

______________________________
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE JOINT CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Emanuel Arbib, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trident Rowan Group,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by this quarterly
report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

July 16, 2003


/s/ Emanuel Arbib
Joint Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of The Peoples BancTrust Company, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No.
33-60935) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-43363 and File No. 333-77109) of our report dated February 28, 2002, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of The Peoples BancTrust Company, Inc. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001 which report is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.





/s/    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





Birmingham, Alabama


March 27, 2002
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-40573

 

ERICA McINTOSH,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Texas 

(1:98-CV-15)

 

July 12, 2000

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6.
### §13531. General jurisdiction

(a) In General.—The Secretary and the Board have jurisdiction, as specified in this part, over service that a freight forwarder undertakes to provide, or is authorized or required under this part to provide, to the extent transportation is provided in the United States and is between—

(1) a place in a State and a place in another State, even if part of the transportation is outside the United States;

(2) a place in a State and another place in the same State through a place outside the State; or

(3) a place in the United States and a place outside the United States.

(b) Exemption of Certain Air Carrier Service.—Neither the Secretary nor the Board has jurisdiction under subsection (a) of this section over service undertaken by a freight forwarder using transportation of an air carrier subject to part A of subtitle VII of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §103, Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 865.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 10561 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
### §2814. Department of Energy energy parks program

#### (a) In general

The Secretary of Energy may establish a program to permit the establishment of energy parks on former defense nuclear facilities.

#### (b) Objectives

The objectives for establishing energy parks pursuant to subsection (a) are the following:

(1) To provide locations to carry out a broad range of projects relating to the development and deployment of energy technologies and related advanced manufacturing technologies.

(2) To provide locations for the implementation of pilot programs and demonstration projects for new and developing energy technologies and related advanced manufacturing technologies.

(3) To set a national example for the development and deployment of energy technologies and related advanced manufacturing technologies in a manner that will promote energy security, energy sector employment, and energy independence.

(4) To create a business environment that encourages collaboration and interaction between the public and private sectors.

#### (c) Consultation

In establishing an energy park pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with—

(1) the local government with jurisdiction over the land on which the energy park will be located;

(2) the local governments of adjacent areas; and

(3) any community reuse organization recognized by the Secretary at the former defense nuclear facility on which the energy park will be located.

#### (d) Report required

Not later than 120 days after January 7, 2011, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report on the implementation of the program under subsection (a). The report shall include such recommendations for additional legislative actions as the Secretary considers appropriate to facilitate the development of energy parks on former defense nuclear facilities.

#### (e) Defense nuclear facility defined

In this section, the term "defense nuclear facility" has the meaning given the term "Department of Energy defense nuclear facility" in section 2286g of title 42.

(Pub. L. 111–383, div. C, title XXXI, §3124, Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4515.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011, and not as part of the Atomic Energy Defense Act which comprises this chapter.
### §1435. Effective period

This chapter shall be effective only during a national emergency declared by Congress or the President and for six months after the termination thereof or until such earlier time as Congress, by concurrent resolution, may designate.

(Pub. L. 85–804, §4, formerly §5, Aug. 28, 1958, 72 Stat. 973; renumbered §4, Pub. L. 105–362, title IX, §901(r)(1)(B), Nov. 10, 1998, 112 Stat. 3291.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 4 of Pub. L. 85–804 was classified to section 1434 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–362.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Nonapplicability of National Emergencies Act

The provisions of the National Emergencies Act [see Short Title note under section 1601 of this title] shall not apply to the powers and authorities conferred by this section and actions taken hereunder, see section 1651(a)(4) of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          79,567
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,497
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      43,252,425
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,857,486
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,633,916
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,819,802
<BONDS>                                     33,087,679
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (17,101,899)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,633,916
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,605,279
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,001,596
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,198,970
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,500,496)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,500,496)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                238,312
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,262,184)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (108.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 902.22 Inspection of PHA projects.

The PHA's score for the physical condition indicator is based on an independent inspection of a PHA's project(s) provided by HUD and using the requirements and timelines laid out in 24 CFR part 5, subpart G, to ensure projects meet acceptable basic housing conditions. Mixed-finance projects will be subject to the physical condition inspections.

[88 FR 30501, May 11, 2023]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                        408,869
<SECURITIES>                  577,150     <F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                 109,629
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
<PP&E>                        12,149,804  <F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                2,749,034
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                10,673,320
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         0
<BONDS>                       6,292,970   <F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      3,259,219   <F4>
<OTHER-SE>                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  10,673,320
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              1,519,604   <F5>
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 818,256     <F6>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              82,198      <F7>
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            556,684
<INCOME-PRETAX>               0
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  62,466
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0


<FN>
<F1>   "SECURITIES" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURE
<F2>   "PP&E" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN REAL ESTATE [LAND AND
BUILDING]
<F3>   "BONDS" REPRESENTS MORTGAGES PAYABLE
<F4>   "COMMON" REPRESENTS TOTAL PARTNERS CAPITAL
<F5>   "TOTAL REVENUES" REPRESENTS RENTAL, INTEREST, AND OTHER
INCOME
<F6>   "TOTAL COSTS" REPRESENTS TOTAL EXPENSES LESS INTEREST EXPENSE
<F7>   "OTHER EXPENSES" REPRESENTS INTEREST IN JOINT VENTURES' NET
INCOME/LOSS
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 15


Deposit Guaranty Corp.
Jackson, Mississippi

Gentlemen:

RE:  June 30, 1997 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

With respect to the subject  Quarterly  Report,  we acknowledge our awareness of
the use  therein  of our  report  dated  July  15,1997  related to our review of
interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities  Act, such report is not considered
a part of a Registration  Statement  prepared or certified by an accountant or a
report  prepared or certified by an accountant  within the meaning of Sections 7
and 11 of the Act.

                                              Very truly yours,


                                          /s/KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
                                            KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Jackson, Mississippi
August 14, 1997
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Dixie Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 25, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jon A. Faulkner, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/JON A. FAULKNER Jon A. Faulkner, Chief Financial Officer
Date:  November 4, 2010  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Dixie Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Dixie Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.