alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **CHAPTER 55—DEFENSE PRODUCTION**

Sec.
4501.
Short title.
4502.
Declaration of policy.

#### SUBCHAPTER I—PRIORITIES AND ALLOCATIONS

4511.
Priority in contracts and orders.
4512.
Hoarding of designated scarce materials.
4513.
Penalties.
4514.
Limitation on actions without congressional authorization.
4515.
Presidential power to ration gasoline among classes of end-users unaffected.
4516.
Designation of energy as a strategic and critical material.
4517.
Strengthening domestic capability.
4518.
Modernization of small business suppliers.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—EXPANSION OF PRODUCTIVE CAPACITY AND SUPPLY

4531.
Presidential authorization for the national defense.
4532.
Loans to private business enterprises.
4533.
Other presidential action authorized.
4534.
Defense Production Act Fund.
4535.
Reports on exercise of authorities.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—GENERAL PROVISIONS

4551.
Small business.
4552.
Definitions.
4553.
Civilian personnel.
4554.
Regulations and orders.
4555.
Investigations; records; reports; subpoenas; right to counsel.
4556.
Jurisdiction of courts; injunctions; venue; process; effect of termination of provisions.
4557.
Liability for compliance with invalid regulations; discrimination against orders or contracts affected by priorities or allocations.
4558.
Voluntary agreements and plans of action for preparedness programs and expansion of production capacity and supply.
4559.
Public participation in rulemaking.
4560.
Employment of personnel; appointment policies; nucleus executive reserve; use of confidential information by employees; printing and distribution of reports.
4561.
Authorization of appropriations; availability of funds.
4562.
Territorial application of chapter.
4563.
Separability.
4564.
Termination of chapter.
4565.
Authority to review certain mergers, acquisitions, and takeovers.
4566.
Prohibition on purchase of United States defense contractors by entities controlled by foreign governments.
4567.
Defense Production Act Committee.
4568.
Annual report on impact of offsets.

#### Termination Date

For termination of certain provisions of this chapter, see section 4564(a) of this title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Act Sept. 8, 1950, ch. 932, 64 Stat. 798, comprising this chapter, was formerly set out in the Appendix to this title, prior to the elimination of the Appendix to this title and the editorial reclassification of the Act as this chapter. For disposition of sections of the former Appendix to this title, see Table II, set out preceding section 1 of this title.

Chapter is comprised of the portions of act Sept. 8, 1950, ch. 932, as amended, that had not previously been repealed when the Act was editorially reclassified as this chapter. As enacted, this Act contained titles I through VII. Titles II, IV, V, and VI of the Act were repealed by Pub. L. 111–67, §2(a)(2), Sept. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 2007. Titles I, III, and VII of the Act have been codified in this chapter to appear as subchapters I to III, respectively. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND IN
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR TO DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,512
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,499
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,374
<PP&E>                                          23,627
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,826
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 160,540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,553
<BONDS>                                        110,429
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          104,718
<PREFERRED>                                          9
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                    (73,191)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   160,540
<SALES>                                          3,292
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,292
<CGS>                                            3,069
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,069
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,623
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,726
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (50,020)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (50,020)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (64,212)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23A



                       Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Number
33-74576 on Form S-3 dated January 28, 1994 and Registration Statement Number
33-71428 on Form S-8 dated November 9, 1993 of our report dated January 23,
1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of George Mason
Bankshares, Inc. incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 1996.


                                                 /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 

Washington, D.C.
March 28, 1997
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. R OB E R T AN DE R S ON , D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 10- 50146 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 0 - c r - 0 1 0 7 9 - A BC ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia A udr e yB . C ol l i ns , C hi e f J udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J une 29, 2010 ** B e f o r e : A L A R C Ó N , L E A V Y , a n dG R A B E R , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . R o b e rt A n d e r s o n ap p e a ls f r o m th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s ju d g m e n t r e v o k in g h is s u p e rv i s e dr e l e a s e . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f i rm. A nd er son con t ends thatthe evi dence w as i nsuffi ci entt o sup po rtthe di stri ct co u rt ’ s d et erm i n at i o n th ath e v i o l at ed a co n d i t i o n o f h i s su p erv i sed rel ease 

# FI LED JU L 01 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 50146 2 re qu i ri ng hi m t o abst ai n from abusi ng al coho l . T he re cord ref l ec t s thatthe di stri ct c ourtpr ope r l yc onc l ude d, byapr e ponde r a nc e of the e vi de nc e , tha tA nde r s on v io la te dth is c o n d itio n . See 1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 8 3 ( e ) ( 3 ) ; se e al so U ni ted States v. P er ez , 52 6 F . 3d 54 3, 54 7 (9th C i r. 20 08 ) ( no t i ng thati n o rdert o sat i sf y the prepon derance s t a nda r d, the r e m us tbe c r e di bl e e vi de nc e tha tthe r e l e a s e e vi ol a t e d the t e rm s of s u p e rv is e dr e le a s e ) . A nd er son’ s due proces s c l ai m i s unp er suas i ve as there i s no i nd i ca t i on that th e d is tr ic t c o u rt r e tr o a c tiv e lym o d if ie dth e “ab u s e ” c o n d itio n to p r o h ib it a ll a lc o h o l u s e . Se e U

ni te d States v . V

ega , 545 F . 3d 743, 750 ( 9th C i r . 2008) ( r e qui r i ng thi s c ourtt o e xa m i ne the f i ndi ngs t o i ns ur e tha tade f e nda nt ’ s due pr oc e s s r i ghtt o not i c e of pr ohi bi t e d c onduc tha s be e n obs e rve d t o pr ot e c thi m f r om u n k n o w in g v io la tio n s ) . A nd er son’ s m ot i on t o cl ar i fythi s c ou rt ’ s pre vi ou s ordergrant i ng expedi t ed br i e f i ng i s de ni e d. AF F I RME D.
Exhibit 21


                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                          RENT-A-WRECK OF AMERICA, INC.

                                                              State or Other
Subsidiary Name and                                          Jurisdiction of
Name Under Which Business is Done                              Organization
---------------------------------                              ------------

1. RENT A WRECK ONE WAY, INC.                                    Maryland
2. BUNDY AMERICAN CORPORATION                                    Maryland
3. RENT A WRECK LEASING, INC.                                    Maryland
4. PRICELESS RENT-A-CAR, INC.                                    Maryland
5. PRICELESS RENT-A-CAR of MARYLAND, INC.                        Maryland
6. CONSOLIDATED AMERICAN RENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD           Bermuda
#### Ronald Carr, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent.

Motion to amend the remittitur herein to show that this court necessarily passed upon a Federal constitutional question denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant-Respondent, v James Spivey, Respondent-Appellant.

Motion by the People for reargument of the appeal from the judgment dated June 11, 1976 and cross motion by defendant to modify the decision of this court dated February 7,1978 [61 AD2d 740], to provide for dismissal of the indictment in lieu of a remand to the trial court for further proceedings. Cross motion denied. Reargument granted and upon reargument the court adheres to its prior decision. While the court stated (p 741) in the original decision that this case "is substantially on all fours with *People v McLaurin,*56 AD2d 80” we are not persuaded that the reversal by the Court of Appeals in *People v McLaurin*(43 NY2d 902) mandates reversal here. Our reliance on *McLaurin*simply highlighted that suppression was mandated on the much stronger facts at bar. Here, the police cannot be said to have acted reasonably where, unlike *McLaurin,*they confronted defendant, blocks from the address given on the radio, defendant bore no distinguishing features of dress, physique or bearing and defendant approached the patrol car openly and voluntarily rather than furtively or suspiciously. We previously considered the nature of the disposition following suppression and, in view of the possibility of additional evidence to support the indictment, we decided to remand rather than dismiss. Defendant will have the opportunity to seek dismissal after the remand. Hence, we have denied the cross motion. Concur—Birns, J. P., Evans, Lane and Markewich, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                              
<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>                        
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
     Partnership's audited financial statements for the year ended September 30,
     1996 and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such  financial
     statements.
</LEGEND>                       
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
                                    
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                  5,067
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                             109
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        5,250
<PP&E>                                  5,099
<DEPRECIATION>                          1,651
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          8,852
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     145
<BONDS>                                 1,671
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                             (1,377)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            8,852
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          773
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             706
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          276
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        195
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (404)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (404)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                             (404)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (10.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6157

LARRY JOE STEVENS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-1162-AM)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 27, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Joe Stevens, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Shea, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Stevens v.

Virginia Parole Board, No. CA-95-1162-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 27, 1995).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                             283
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   73,999
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,537
<INVENTORY>                                    165,551
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               245,164
<PP&E>                                         349,757
<DEPRECIATION>                                 190,331
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 416,728
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          276,561
<BONDS>                                          5,040
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,206
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,352
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   416,728
<SALES>                                      1,013,777
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,013,777
<CGS>                                          956,948
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  956,948
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                95,728
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,143
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (50,396)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (18,260)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (32,183)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (32,183)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.86)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### SUBCHAPTER IV—RAILROAD COST ACCOUNTING
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Drexel
Burnham Lambert Real Estate Associates III 1996 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000761657
<NAME> DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES III
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       3,446,748
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  334,289
<ALLOWANCES>                                    42,851
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      33,063,499
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,070,926
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,265,072
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                     15,725,021
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,946,643
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,265,072
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            90,701,507
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,133,074
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,440,224
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (61,567)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### § 57.19065 Lowering conveyances by the brakes.

Conveyances shall not be lowered by the brakes alone except during emergencies.
#### § 57.7011 Straightening crossed cables.

The drill stem shall be resting on the bottom of the hole or on the platform with the stem secured to the mast before attempts are made to straighten a crossed cable on a reel.
No. 89-1091.

#### Sobol, Commissioner of the New York State Education Department *v.*Burr, by his Parents and Next Friends, Burr et ux.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### GEIN, Respondent, v. LITTLE, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 10, 1905.)

Action by Louis H. Gein against William M. Little. A. R. Hager, for appellant. L. W. Thompson, for respondent. No opinion. Judgment (89 N. Y. Supp. 488) affirmed, with costs.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSteady-State and Transient Boundary Element Methods for Coupled Heat ConductionBoundary element algorithms for the solution of steady-state and transient heat conduction are presented. The algorithms are designed for efficient coupling with computational fluid dynamic discretizations and feature piecewise linear elements with offset nodal points. The steady-state algorithm employs the fundamental solution approach; the integration kernels are computed analytically based on linear shape functions, linear elements, and variably offset nodal points. The analytic expressions for both singular and nonsingular integrands are presented. The transient algorithm employs the transient fundamental solution; the temporal integration is performed analytically and the nonsingular spatial integration is performed numerically using Gaussian quadrature. A series solution to the integration is derived for the instance of a singular integrand. The boundary-only character of the algorithm is maintained by integrating the influence coefficients from initial time. Numerical results are compared to analytical solutions to verify the current boundary element algorithms. The steady-state and transient algorithms are numerically shown to be second-order accurate in space and time, respectively.Document ID19970011271Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsKontinos, Dean A.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1997Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberA-975389NASA-TM-110427NAS 1.15:110427Accession Number97N16236Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 242-80-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970011271.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.519 What are the requirements for casing pressure management?

Once you install your wellhead, you must meet the casing pressure management requirements of API RP 90 (as incorporated by reference in § 250.198) and the requirements of §§ 250.519 through 250.531. If there is a conflict between API RP 90 and the casing pressure requirements of this subpart, you must follow the requirements of this subpart.

[84 FR 21976, May 15, 2019]
#### § 700.100 Purpose.

The requirements of this part augment the requirements of section 802 of the National Affordable Housing Act of 1990 (approved November 28, 1990, Public Law 101-625) (42 U.S.C. 8011), (hereinafter, section 802), as amended by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-550, approved October 28, 1992), which authorizes the Congregate Housing Services Program (hereinafter, CHSP or Program).