alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §11705. Limitation on actions by and against rail carriers

(a) A rail carrier providing transportation or service subject to the jurisdiction of the Board under this part must begin a civil action to recover charges for transportation or service provided by the carrier within 3 years after the claim accrues.

(b) A person must begin a civil action to recover overcharges under section 11704(b) of this title within 3 years after the claim accrues, whether or not a complaint is filed under section 11704(c)(1).

(c) A person must file a complaint with the Board to recover damages under section 11704(b) of this title within 2 years after the claim accrues.

(d) The limitation period under subsection (b) of this section is extended for 6 months from the time written notice is given to the claimant by the rail carrier of disallowance of any part of the claim specified in the notice if a written claim is given to the rail carrier within that limitation period. The limitation periods under subsections (b) and (c) of this section are extended for 90 days from the time the rail carrier begins a civil action under subsection (a) of this section to recover charges related to the same transportation or service, or collects (without beginning a civil action under that subsection) the charge for that transportation or service if that action is begun or collection is made within the appropriate period.

(e) A person must begin a civil action to enforce an order of the Board against a rail carrier for the payment of money within one year after the date the order required the money to be paid.

(f) This section applies to transportation for the United States Government. The time limitations under this section are extended, as related to transportation for or on behalf of the United States Government, for 3 years from the date of—

(1) payment of the rate for the transportation or service involved;

(2) subsequent refund for overpayment of that rate; or

(3) deduction made under section 3726 of title 31, whichever is later.

(g) A claim related to a shipment of property accrues under this section on delivery or tender of delivery by the rail carrier.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §102(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 847.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 11706 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

A prior section 11705, Pub. L. 95–473, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1451; Pub. L. 99–521, §12(b), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2998, related to rights and remedies of persons injured by certain carriers, prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a). See sections 11704, 14704, and 15904 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON DC 

) 

AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION OF ) 

AMERICA, INC. d/b/a AIRLINES FOR ) 

AMERICA, et al., ) 

) 

Complainants, ) 

~ ) 

) 

PORT OF PORTLAND, OREGON, ) 

) 

Respondent. ) 

ORDER 

Docket No. 16-16-04 

On April22, 2016, counsel for Complainant filed a Consent Motion for an Extension of Time 

under 14 C.F.R. § 16.19(e), requesting a 30 day extension of time to file its Reply to the 

Answer to the Complaint until May 25, 2016. 

Counsel advised that additional time is needed to investigate, gather evidence and prepare a 

Reply to the voluminous 3 20 page Answer to the Complaint, which was filed on April 15, 

2016. Counsel advised that the Respondent does not oppose an extension. 

Part 16 is intended to expedite substantially the handling and disposition of airport-related 

complaints. See Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted Airports (Retrospective Regulatory 

Review) Final Ru1e, 78 Fed. Reg. 56135 (Sept. 12, 2013); Rules of Practice for FederallyAssisted Airport Enforcement Proceedings Final Rule, 61 Fed. Reg. 53998 (Oct. 16, 1996). 

Parties may file a written motion for an extension of time. 14 C.F.R. § 16.19(e). The Director 

may issue an order extending any time period prescribed where necessary or appropriate for a 

fair and complete consideration of matters before the agency. 14 C.F.R. § 16.11(a). An 

extension of time is reasonable under the circumstances. Accordingly, the Complainants' 

consent motion is hereby GRANTED. The Reply shall be due on May 25,2016. 

By on K. Huffman 

Acting Director, Office of Airport 

Compliance and Management Analysis 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on April22, 2016, I have served a true copy of the foregoing 

ORDER on the following persons at the following addresses or email addresses: 

Counsel for Complainants: 

David Berg, Esq. 

Vice President & General Counsel 

Doug Mullen, Esq. 

Assistant General Counsel 

Air Transport Association of America, Inc. d/b/a Airlines for America 

1275 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Suite 1300 

Washington, D.C. 20004 

(202) 626-4234 

Email: dberg@airlines.org; dmullen@airlines.org 

Roy Goldberg, Esq. 

Steptoe & Johnson LLP 

1330 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

(202) 429-8028 

Email: rgoldberg@steptoe.com 

Counsel for Respondents: 

Daniel Blaufus, Esq 

General Counsel 

Ian Whitlock, Esq. 

Deputy General Counsel 

Wendy Hairr, Esq. Assistant General Counsel 

THE PORT OF PORTLAND 

7200 NE Airport Way Portland, OR 97218 

Email: dan.blaufus@portofportland.com; ian. whitlock@portofportland.com; 

wendy.hain@portofportland.com 

Phone: 503-415-6062 

Pablo 0. Niiesch, Esq. 

SPIEGEL & MCDIARMID LLP 

1875 Eye Street, NW Suite 700 

Washington, DC 20006 

Email: pablo.nuesch@spiegelmcd.com Phone: 202-879-4000 

Hand-Delivered to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket (AGC-600) 

FAA Office of Airport Compliance and Man~gement Analysis (A CO-l 00) 

/1/,~ ., lfl, ux:d;~vJV ;l/Vv/----

claudia Roberts 

Office of Airport Compliance
Exhibit 99.1

# Certifications Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mariner Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott D. Josey, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

|/s/ Scott D. Josey                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|Name: Scott D. Josey
Title: Chairman of the Board
Date: November 19, 2002
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2015-2714 Directorate ID: 2014-SW-052-AD

Helicopter Model: Airbus Helicopters Model AS332C1, AS332L1, AS332L2, EC225LP, AS365N2, AS 365 N3, EC 155B, and EC155B1 helicopters with a certain energy absorbing seat.

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 52 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this Airworthiness Directive are intended to prevent objects from being 

stowed under the seat as these objects could reduce the energy-absorbing function of the seat, 

resulting in injury to the seat occupants during an accident.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $ Minimal

Labor per Helicopter

(.25 work hour X $85 for 

inspection)

$21

Other

(Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $21

Total US Fleet Cost $1,092

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Robert Grant
### **CHAPTER 221—LOCAL RAIL FREIGHT ASSISTANCE**

Sec.
22101.
Financial assistance for State projects.
22102.
Eligibility.
22103.
Applications.
22104.
State rail plan financing.
22105.
Sharing project costs.
22106.
Limitations on financial assistance.
22107.
Records, audits, and information.
[22108.
Repealed.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2015**—Pub. L. 114–94, div. A, title XI, §11301(c)(4), Dec. 4, 2015, 129 Stat. 1648, struck out item 22108 "Authorization of appropriations".
§ 550.120 What standards will BOEM use to regulate leases, rights-of-use and easement, and rights-of-way? BOEM will regulate all activities under a lease, a right-of-use and easement, or a right-of-way to: ( a ) Promote the orderly exploration, development, and production of mineral resources;
( b ) Prevent injury or loss of life;
( c ) Prevent damage to or waste of any natural resource, property, or the environment; and
( d ) Ensure cooperation and consultation with affected States, local governments, other interested parties, and relevant Federal agencies.
[81 FR 18152, Mar. 30, 2016]
### §§488 to 488f. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 488 to 488f, relating to Territory of Alaska, were omitted in view of admission of Alaska into the Union.

Section 488, act May 10, 1956, ch. 248, §1, 70 Stat. 149, authorized Territory of Alaska to borrow for public improvements and to issue bonds of Territory for such borrowing.

Section 488a, act May 10, 1956, ch. 248, §2, 70 Stat. 149, placed limitations on Territory in contracting debts.

Section 488b, act May 10, 1956, ch. 248, §3, 70 Stat. 150, made provisions for type of land to be issued, scheduling of maturity of bonds, payment of bonds, redemption of bond, and refunding.

Section 488c, act May 10, 1956, ch. 248, §4, 70 Stat. 150, authorized the Territory to borrow on the credit of the Territory and to issue certificates of indebtedness.

Section 488d, act May 10, 1956, ch. 248, §5, 70 Stat. 150, provided for issuance of bonds and certificates as negotiable instruments.

Section 488e, act May 10, 1956, ch. 248, §6, 70 Stat. 150, authorized payment of interest on principal of bonds and certificates of indebtedness as they fall due.

Section 488f, act May 10, 1956, ch. 248, §7, 70 Stat. 150, authorized guarantee of payment on municipality and school and public utility district bonds.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 DEBORAH E. GAUDET,

3 Plaintiff-Appellant,

4 v. No. A-1-CA-35510

5 TONI DREW and

6 RESILIENCY THERAPY, 

7 Defendant-Appellees.

8 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY

9 David K. Thomson, District Judge

10 Deborah E. Gaudet

11 Santa Fe, NM

12 Pro Se Appellant

13 Christopher R. Reed

14 Albuquerque, NM

15 for Appellee

16 MEMORANDUM OPINION

17 GARCIA, Judge.
2

1 {1} Plaintiff Deborah Gaudet (Appellant), a self-represented litigant, appealed from

2 the district court’s order dismissing her complaint with prejudice as a sanction for

3 failure to provide discovery. This Court issued a calendar notice proposing summary

4 affirmance on January 20, 2017. The calendar notice was mailed to the address on file

5 for Ms. Gaudet and was returned by the postal service as “attempted not known.” The

6 Rules of Appellate Procedure require a party proceeding pro se to promptly inform

7 this Court of any change of mailing address. Rule 12-301(D) NMRA (“Counsel for

8 a party, or any party proceeding pro se, shall promptly give notice of any change of

9 mailing address or telephone number by filing a notice with the clerk of the court in

10 each pending cause in which counsel or the party is appearing and by serving the

11 notice upon all other counsel and pro se parties.”). Because the time for filing a

12 response to the calendar notice has expired, we now affirm for the reasons stated in

13 the calendar notice.

14 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.

15 ________________________________

16 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

17 WE CONCUR:

18 _______________________________

19 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge
3

1 _______________________________

2 HENRY M. BOHNHOFF, Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3404 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3404

   To authorize the grant program for elimination of the nationwide 
backlog in analyses of DNA samples at the level necessary to completely 
    eliminate the backlog and obtain a DNA sample from every person 
                   convicted of a qualifying offense.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 2005

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize the grant program for elimination of the nationwide 
backlog in analyses of DNA samples at the level necessary to completely 
    eliminate the backlog and obtain a DNA sample from every person 
                   convicted of a qualifying offense.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``DNA Database Completion Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF DNA BACKLOG GRANTS AT LEVEL NECESSARY TO 
              COMPLETELY ELIMINATE BACKLOG AND OBTAIN DNA SAMPLES FROM 
              ALL PERSONS CONVICTED OF QUALIFYING OFFENSES.

    Subsection (j) of section 2 of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination 
Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 14135) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(j) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Attorney General for grants under subsection (a)--
            ``(1) for grants under paragraph (1) of such subsection, 
        $100,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2005 through 2009; and
            ``(2) for grants under other paragraphs of such subsection, 
        $151,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2005 through 2009.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 254.43 Maintenance and periodic inspection of response equipment. ( a ) You must ensure that the response equipment listed in your OSRP is inspected at least monthly and is maintained, as necessary, to ensure optimal performance.
( b ) You must ensure that records of the inspections and the maintenance activities are kept for at least 2 years and are made available to any authorized BSEE representative upon request.
[76 FR 64462, Oct. 18, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 36153, June 6, 2016]
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

CHRISTIAN SERRANO

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 2767

[ November 8, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Martin S. Fein , Judge; L.T. Case No. 14010663 CF10A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Peggy Natale, Assistant Public

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Luke R.

Napodano, Assistant Attorney General , West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

G ERBER , C.J., W ARNER and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 33.20 Design and construction. ( a ) MSHA will not test or investigate any dust collector that in its opinion is not constructed of suitable materials, that evidences faulty workmanship, or that is not designed upon sound engineering principles. Since all possible designs, arrangements, or combinations of components and materials cannot be foreseen, MSHA reserves the right to modify the tests specified in this part in such manner to obtain substantially the same information and degree of protection as provided by the tests described in Subpart C of this part.
( b ) Adequacy of design and construction of a unit or system will be determined in accordance with its ability ( 1 ) to prevent the dissemination of objectionable or harmful concentrations of dust into a mine atmosphere, and
( 2 ) to protect against explosion and/or fire hazards of electrical equipment, except as provided in § 33.38(b).
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Tumbleweed Communications Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Timothy G.
Conley, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 12, 2004



|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ TIMOTHY G. CONLEY                                                         
|Timothy G. Conley Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer



This certification
accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.1408 When will I be notified of the Reviewing Officer's decision?

At the end of the 30 calendar days or after the meeting and submittal of additional information, the Reviewing Officer will review the case file, including all information you submitted, and send you a decision. The decision will include the amount of any final civil penalty, the basis for the civil penalty, and instructions for paying or appealing the civil penalty.
### **CHAPTER 305—NATIONAL MOTOR VEHICLE TITLE INFORMATION SYSTEM**

Sec.
30501.
Definitions.
30502.
National Motor Vehicle Title Information System.
30503.
State participation.
30504.
Reporting requirements.
30505.
Penalties and enforcement.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1997**—Pub. L. 105–102, §3(b), Nov. 20, 1997, 111 Stat. 2215, amended directory language of Pub. L. 104–152. See 1996 Amendment note below.

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–152, §2(c), July 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1384, as amended by Pub. L. 105–102, §3(b), Nov. 20, 1997, 111 Stat. 2215, substituted "National Motor Vehicle Title Information System" for "National Automobile Title Information System" in chapter heading and in item 30502.
### §§43 to 45. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 43 to 45, relating to Territory of Alaska, were omitted in view of admission of Alaska into the Union.

Section 43, acts June 6, 1900, ch. 786, §33, 31 Stat. 333; Dec. 16, 1930, ch. 14, §1, 46 Stat. 1029, designated Alaska Historical Library and Museum as a depository of Government publications.

Section 44, acts Aug. 24, 1912, ch. 387, §9, 37 Stat. 514; June 3, 1948, ch. 396, 62 Stat. 302, limited amount of taxes that could be levied by incorporated towns or municipalities.

Section 44a, act May 28, 1936, ch. 467, §1, 49 Stat. 1388, related to bonded indebtedness of municipalities for public works.

Section 44b, acts May 28, 1936, ch. 467, §2, 49 Stat. 1388; June 14, 1937, ch. 337, 50 Stat. 258, related to approval by electors of bonded indebtedness incurred by municipal corporation.

Section 44c, act May 28, 1936, ch. 467, §3, 49 Stat. 1388, provided for issuance, sale and redemption, and interest rates of bonds.

Section 44d, act May 28, 1936, ch. 467, §4, 49 Stat. 1389, authorized tax levies for payment of bonds.

Section 44e, act May 28, 1936, ch. 467, §5, 49 Stat. 1389, repealed conflicting laws.

Section 44f, act Mar. 6, 1946, ch. 52, §1, 60 Stat. 33, authorized bonds for public works by municipalities and public utility districts.

Section 44g, act Mar. 6, 1946, ch. 52, §2, 60 Stat. 33, related to issuance, sale and redemption, and interest rates on bonds for public works.

Section 44h, act Mar. 6, 1946, ch. 52, §3, 60 Stat. 34, related to covenants in bonds issue for public works.

Section 44i, act Mar. 6, 1946, ch. 52, §4, 60 Stat. 34, repealed laws inconsistent with sections 44f to 44i of this title.

Section 45, act Aug. 24, 1912, ch. 387, §9, 37 Stat. 514, prescribed residence qualifications for divorce actions.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 23

- 00818

- CV

IN THE ESTATE OF George CARSON , Deceased

From the Probate Court No

. 1

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019

- PC

- 3843

Honorable Oscar J. Kazen , Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. Given our

disposition of this appeal, the pending motion to consolidate is DENIED AS MOOT

.

We order the costs of this appeal to be paid by the parties who incurred them.

SIGNED December 13, 2023.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice
### SUBCHAPTER I—POWERS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1997—Pub. L. 105–102, §2(2), Nov. 20, 1997, 111 Stat. 2204, struck out "AND" before "POWERS".

1995—Pub. L. 104–88, title III, §308(c)(1), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 947, struck out "DUTIES" before "AND".