alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
9 Consejos para Reducir el Riesgo de Exposición 

al Virus Covid-19 para las Instalaciones de 

Procesamiento de Carne y Aves y Envasado

Manténgase a usted y a los trabajadores de su alrededor seguros. Tome 

estas medidas aun si usted no muestra síntomas del virus COVID-19.

OSHA 4051-07 2020 — 9 Steps to Reducing Worker Exposure to COVID-19 in Meat, Poultry, and Pork Processing and Packaging Facilities (Spanish)

Quédese en su 

hogar si está 

enfermo.

➊

Use equipo de protección 

por razones de seguridad 

general y para limitar 

la propagación del virus. 

➐

Evite las reuniones 

de grupos durante 

descansos, aun 

si afuera.

➌ Instale particiones a 

lo largo de la línea de 

producción para conseguir 

el distanciamiento social. 

➍

➎ Evite compartir equipo y

herramientas. Limpie

con frecuencia las

herramientas y equipo

que necesita compartirse.

Denuncie cualquiera 

preocupación acerca de la 

seguridad y la salud ante 

su supervisor u OSHA.

➑

➏ Use agua y jabón para

lavarse las manos.

➋ Mantenga al menos 6 pies

de distancia física entre los

compañeros de trabajo.

1-800-321-OSHA (6742)

TTY 1-877-889-5627

www.osha.gov

Administración de 

Seguridad y Salud 

Ocupacional

Evite el uso de vehículos 

compartidos para llegar 

y regresar de su trabajo, 

de ser posible.

➒ Manténgase informado sobre las 

recomendaciones de salud pública. 

Para más información, visite 

www.osha.gov/coronavirus o llame

al 1-800-321-OSHA (6742).
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3384 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3384

               To make permanent marriage penalty relief.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 2005

  Mr. Jindal introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               To make permanent marriage penalty relief.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Permanent Marriage Equity Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF SUNSET ON MARRIAGE PENALTY RELIEF.

    Title IX of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act 
of 2001 (relating to sunset of provisions of such Act) shall not apply 
to sections 301, 302, and 303 of such Act (relating to marriage penalty 
relief).
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public AccountingFirm

 

The Board of Trustees and Shareholders of

U-Store-IT Trust:

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 (No. 333-143126, 333-143125, 333-143124,333-134684 and 333-119987) and the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-156463,333-141709, and 333-141710) of U-Store-It Trust and subsidiaries of ourreport dated March 1, 2010,  withrespect to the consolidated balance sheets of U-Store-It Trust as of December 31,2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, equity, and cashflows for the year then ended, and the related financial statement schedule,and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, whichreports appear in the accompanying Form 10-K of U-Store-It Trust.

 
| /s/ KPMG LLP                |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
|                        |   |
|                        |   |
| Philadelphia,  Pennsylvania |   |
| March 1, 2010          |   |

 

----
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPassive Rocket Diffuser Testing: Reacting Flow Performance of Four Second-Throat GeometriesSecond-throat diffusers serve to isolate rocket engines from the effects of ambient back pressure. As one of the nation's largest rocket testing facilities, the performance and design limitations of diffusers are of great interest to NASA's Stennis Space Center. This paper describes a series of tests conducted on four diffuser configurations to better understand the effects of inlet geometry and throat area on starting behavior and boundary layer separation. The diffusers were tested for a duration of five seconds with a 1455-pound thrust, LO2/GH2 thruster to ensure they each reached aerodynamic steady state. The effects of a water spray ring at the diffuser exits and a water-cooled deflector plate were also evaluated. Static pressure and temperature measurements were taken at multiple axial locations along the diffusers, and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations were used as a tool to aid in the interpretation of data. The hot combustion products were confirmed to enable the diffuser start condition with tighter second throats than predicted by historical cold-flow data or the theoretical normal shock method. Both aerodynamic performance and heat transfer were found to increase with smaller diffuser throats. Spray ring and deflector cooling water had negligible impacts on diffuser boundary layer separation. CFD was found to accurately capture diffuser shock structures and full-flowing diffuser wall pressures, and the qualitative behavior of heat transfer. However, the ability to predict boundary layer separated flows was not consistent.Document ID20170001791Acquisition SourceStennis Space CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsJones, Daniel R.*(Stennis Space Center Bay Saint Louis, Mississippi, United States)*Allgood, Daniel C.*(Stennis Space Center Bay Saint Louis, Mississippi, United States)*Saunders, Grady P.*(Jacobs (United States) Dallas, Texas, United States)*Date AcquiredFebruary 27, 2017Publication DateDecember 1, 2016Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2016-219221Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NNS07AB21CDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameTypeNASA TM 2016-219221.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF IMPSAT CORPORATION AND ITS CONSOLIDATED
SUBSIDIARIES AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          29,455
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,902
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,572
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,513
<PP&E>                                         243,286
<DEPRECIATION>                                  85,631
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 341,916
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          108,567
<BONDS>                                        156,902
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       100,793
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   341,916
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                75,060
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,950
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,478
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   821
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,434
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    632
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,769
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,725)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 21.1



FCStone Group, Inc.

A Delaware Corporation



|                               |  |                              
|------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|Subsidiaries                   |  | Jurisdiction of
Incorporation
|FCC Futures, Inc.              |  | Iowa                         
|FCC Investments, Inc.          |  | Iowa                         
|FCStone, LLC                   |  | Iowa                         
|FCStone Advisory, Inc.         |  | Iowa                         
|FCStone Carbon, LLC            |  | Iowa                         
|FCStone do Brazil              |  | Brazil                       
|FCStone Financial, Inc.        |  | Iowa                         
|FCStone Forex, LLC             |  | Iowa                         
|FCStone Information, LLC       |  | Iowa                         
|FCStone International, LLC     |  | Iowa                         
|FCStone Investments, Inc.      |  | Iowa                         
|FCStone Trading, LLC           |  | Iowa                         
|FCStone Merchant Services, LLC |  | Delaware                     
|Westown Commodities, LLC       |  | Iowa
§ 254.5 General response plan requirements. ( a ) The OSRP must provide for response to an oil spill from the facility. You must immediately carry out the provisions of the OSRP whenever there is a release of oil from the facility. You must also carry out the training, equipment testing, and periodic drills described in the OSRP, and these measures must be sufficient to ensure the safety of the facility and to mitigate or prevent a discharge or a substantial threat of a discharge.
( b ) The OSRP must be consistent with the National Contingency Plan and the appropriate Area Contingency Plan(s).
( c ) Nothing in this part relieves you from taking all appropriate actions necessary to immediately abate the source of a spill and remove any spills of oil.
( d ) In addition to the requirements listed in this part, you must provide any other information the Chief, OSPD, requires for compliance with appropriate laws and regulations.
[76 FR 64462, Oct. 18, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 36152, June 6, 2016]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
      The schedule contains consolidated summary financial information extracted
from this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 1999 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                     43,752,000
<SECURITIES>                               38,149,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           83,833,000
<PP&E>                                      5,536,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,539,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            106,355,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      22,536,000
<BONDS>                                       117,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                       170
<COMMON>                                       29,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 83,672,830
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              106,355,000
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           19,901,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (18,431,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (18,431,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                              (18,431,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.64)
        


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Ruby R., an Infant. Yates County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Thomas R., Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[833 NYS2d 422]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Yates County (W Patrick Falvey, J), entered March 9, 2006 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10. The order, among other things, released the child to the sole custody of her mother subject to a custody proceeding and ordered respondent to undergo psychological and psychiatric examinations.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present—Hurlbutt, J.P, Martoche, Smith, Centra and Peradotto, JJ.
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

In re : RICHARD RALPH MALCOLM,
Petitioner

______________________

2022

- 132

______________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States
Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:20

- cv

- 00505

- SSS, Judge Stephen S. Schwartz.

______________________

ON PETITION AND MOTION

______________________

Before P ROST

, R EYNA , and C UNNINGHAM

, Circuit Judge s

.
P ER C URIAM

. O R D E R

Richard Ralph Malco l m petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking, inter alia, an order from this court directing
the United States Court of Federal Claims to file his motion
for summary judgment

. Mr. Malco l m also moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis

.
Mr. Malco l m filed th is suit with the Court of Federal Claims seeking retroactive medical disability retirement

. In August 2021, t he Court of Federal Claims remanded to
the Board for Correction of Naval Records to consider Mr.
Malco l m’s evidence. Following the Board’s decision on Case: 22-132 Document: 6 Page: 1 Filed: 04/15/2022IN RE : MALCOLM 2

remand, the Court of Federal Claims issued a scheduling order on March 7, 2022

, that , inter alia, directed the government to supplement the administrative record with the record from the remand proceedings by March 14, 2022

, and directed Mr. Malco l m to file any motion for judgment on the administrative record by April 13, 2022.

On March 8, 2022, Mr. Malco l m filed a motion for summary judgment. On the same day, the Court of Federal Claims issued an order rejecting the filing. The court explained that the filing did not comply with the court’s rules
because it lacked the case caption and the name of the presiding judge. The court further explained that any motion
for summar y judgment would be premature and unnecessary at th at juncture given that the administrative record
ha d not yet been filed

. This petition followed.

Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, available only where the petitioner shows: (1) there are no adequate a lternative legal channels through which he may obtain that relief; ( 2 ) a clear and indisputable right to relief; and (3)the grant of mandamus is appropriate under the circumstances. See Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct

. for D .C. , 542 U.S. 367,

380

– 81 (2004). Mr. Malcolm has not shown any clear error in the March 8, 2022

, rejection order. Mr. Malco l m also hasreadily available alternative means to raise the same arguments for judgment by filing a motion for judgment on the
administrative record by April 13, 2022

, or other motions that comply with the trial court’s rules and orders.

Accordingly,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
(1) The petition is denied. Case: 22-132 Document: 6 Page: 2 Filed: 04/15/2022IN RE : MALCOLM 3

(2) The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis
is denied as moot

.

April 15 , 2022
Date F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court Case: 22-132 Document: 6 Page: 3 Filed: 04/15/2022
### §115. Limitation on State authority to tax compensation paid to individuals performing services at Fort Campbell, Kentucky

Pay and compensation paid to an individual for personal services at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, shall be subject to taxation by the State or any political subdivision thereof of which such employee is a resident.

(Added Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title X, §1075(a)(1), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2138.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title X, §1075(a)(3), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2138, provided that: "The amendments made by this subsection [enacting this section] shall apply to pay and compensation paid after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 17, 1998]."
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 22, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00440

- CR

Ronald GUILLORY , Jr.,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1991CR4522

Honorable Sid L. Harle , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED

FOR LACK OF JURISDIC TION.

It is so ORDERED on August 22, 2018

.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on thi s 22nd day of August, 2018

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9547 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to conduct a study on firefighter rapid 

intervention team training and equipment at Department of Defense facilities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 11, 2024 

Ms. SHERRILL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to conduct a study on 

firefighter rapid intervention team training and equipment at Department of Defense facilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving Military 

5 Firefighter Safety Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STUDY ON FIREFIGHTER RAPID INTERVENTION 

7 TEAM TRAINING AND EQUIPMENT AT DE8 PARTMENT OF DEFENSE FACILITIES. 

9 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct 

10 a study of the training standards for firefighter rapid 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9547 IH

1 intervention teams and the use of equipment by such 

2 teams at Department of Defense facilities. Such study 

3 shall include— 

4 (1) an identification of such training standards 

5 and equipment that, as of the date of the enactment 

6 of this Act, are in use by such teams and the extent 

7 to which such training and equipment is standard 

8 across firefighter rapid intervention teams located at 

9 different Department facilities; 

10 (2) an identification of such training standards 

11 and equipment that, as of the date of the enactment 

12 of this Act, are in use by such teams at Department 

13 naval and port facilities and a determination by the 

14 Secretary of whether such training and equipment is 

15 sufficient to prepare such teams for fires on the var16 ious ships that dock at such facilities; and 

17 (3) a description of any incident that— 

18 (A) occurred during the ten-year period 

19 preceding the date of the enactment of this Act 

20 in which a firefighter was injured or killed at 

21 a Department facility; and 

22 (B) the Secretary finds could have been 

23 prevented if the firefighters involved had re24 ceived different training or equipment. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 9547 IH

1 (b) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than Sep2 tember 30, 2025, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 

3 to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 

4 House of Representatives a report containing the results 

5 of the study required under subsection (a). 

6 (c) FIREFIGHTER RAPID INTERVENTION TEAM DE7 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘firefighter rapid inter8 vention team’’ means a designated firefighting crew that 

9 serves as a stand-by rescue team at the scenes of fires 

10 and other emergencies and is available for the immediate 

11 search and rescue of missing, trapped, or injured fire12 fighters if required. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### §§ 285.1001-285.1013 [Reserved]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSignal Strength-Based Global Navigation Satellite System Performance Assessment in the Space Service VolumeNASA is participating in the International Committee on Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) (ICG)'s efforts towards demonstrating the benefits to the space user in the Space Service Volume (SSV) when a multi-GNSS solution space approach is utilized. The ICG Working Group: Enhancement of GNSS Performance, New Services and Capabilities has started a three phase analysis initiative as an outcome of recommendations at the ICG-10 meeting, in preparation for the ICG-11 meeting. The second phase of that increasing complexity and fidelity analysis initiative is based on augmenting the Phase 1 pure geometrical approach with signal strength-based limitations to determine if access is valid. The second phase of analysis has been completed, and the results are documented in this paper.Document ID20160013864Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsWelch, Bryan W.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredNovember 30, 2016Publication DateNovember 1, 2016Subject CategorySpace Communications, Spacecraft Communications, Command And TrackingReport/Patent NumberGRC-E-DAA-TN36179NASA/TM-2016-219399E-19301Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 439432.07.01.15.07.02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Keywordsnavigationradio navigationGlobal Positioning SystemAvailable DownloadsNameType20160013864.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024