alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 49.6 Equipment and maintenance requirements. ( a ) Each mine rescue station shall be provided with at least the following equipment: ( 1 ) Twelve self-contained breathing apparatus, each with a minimum of 4 hours capacity (approved by MSHA and NIOSH under 42 CFR Part 84, Subpart H), and any necessary equipment for testing such breathing apparatus;
( 2 ) A portable supply of liquid air, liquid oxygen, pressurized oxygen, or oxygen generating chemicals, and carbon dioxide absorbent chemicals, applicable to the supplied breathing apparatus and sufficient to sustain each team for eight hours while using the breathing apparatus during rescue operations.
( 3 ) Two extra, fully-charged oxygen bottles for every six self-contained breathing apparatus;
( 4 ) One oxygen pump or a cascading system, compatible with the supplied breathing apparatus;
( 5 ) Twelve permissible cap lamps and a charging rack;
( 6 ) Four gas detectors appropriate for each type of gas that may be encountered at the mines served. Gas detectors must measure concentrations of methane from 0.0 percent to 100 percent of volume, oxygen from 0.0 percent to at least 20 percent of volume, and carbon monoxide from 0.0 parts per million to at least 9,999 parts per million.
( 7 ) [Reserved]
( 8 ) One portable mine rescue communication system (approved under part 23 of this title) or a sound-powered communication system. ( i ) The wires or cable to the communication system shall be of sufficient tensile strength to be used as a manual communication system.
( ii ) These communication systems shall be at least 1,000 feet in length.
( 9 ) Necessary spare parts and tools for repairing the breathing apparatus and communication system.
( b ) Mine rescue apparatus and equipment shall be maintained in a manner that will ensure readiness for immediate use. ( 1 ) A person trained in the use and care of breathing apparatus shall inspect and test the apparatus at intervals not exceeding 30 days and shall certify by signature and date that the inspections and tests were done.
( 2 ) When the inspection indicates that a corrective action is necessary, the corrective action shall be made and the person shall record the corrective action taken.
( 3 ) The certification and the record of corrective action shall be maintained at the mine rescue station for a period of one year and made available on request to an authorized representative of the Secretary.
[73 FR 53123, Sept. 15, 2008]
§ 556.303 What does BOEM do if an area proposed for leasing is within three nautical miles of the seaward boundary of a coastal State? For an area proposed for leasing that is within three nautical miles of the seaward boundary of a coastal State, as governed by section 8(g)(1) of OCSLA (43 U.S.C. 1337(g)(1)): ( a ) BOEM provides the governor of the coastal State, subject to the confidentiality requirements in this chapter: ( 1 ) A schedule for leasing; and
( 2 ) An estimate of the potential oil and gas resources.
( b ) At the request of the governor of a coastal State, BOEM will provide to that governor, subject to the confidentiality requirements in this chapter: ( 1 ) Information concerning geographical, geological, and ecological characteristics; and
( 2 ) An identification of any field, geological structure, or trap, or portion thereof, that lies within three nautical miles of the State's boundary.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9483 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to prohibit Department of Defense 

special Government employees from obligating or expending Federal 

funds while carrying out their official duties, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 6, 2024 

Ms. PORTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to prohibit Department of Defense special Government employees from obligating or expending Federal funds while carrying out 

their official duties, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preventing Corruption 

5 in Advisory Roles Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9483 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING DOD SPECIAL GOVERNMENT EM2 PLOYEES FROM SPENDING FEDERAL FUNDS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 81 of title 10, United 

4 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1589 

5 the following: 

6 ‘‘§ 1590. Prohibition on special Government employ7 ees from obligations or expending Fed8 eral funds 

9 ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a spe10 cial Government employee (as that term is defined in sec11 tion 202(a) of title 18) occupying a position in the Depart12 ment of Defense may not, while carrying out the official 

13 duties of the employee’s position, obligate or expend any 

14 Federal funds.’’. 

15 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

16 for such chapter is amended by inserting after the item 

17 relating to section 1589 the following: 

‘‘1590. Prohibition on special Government employees from obligations or expending Federal funds.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
### §6362. Energy conservation policies and practices

#### (a) "Agency" defined

In this section, "agency" means—

(1) the Department of Transportation with respect to part A of subtitle VII of title 49, United States Code;

(2) the Interstate Commerce Commission;

(3) the Federal Maritime Commission; and

(4) the Federal Power Commission.

#### (b) Statement of probable impact of major regulatory action on energy efficiency

Except as provided in subsection (c), each of the agencies specified in subsection (a) shall, where practicable and consistent with the exercise of their authority under other law, include in any major regulatory action (as defined by rule by each such agency) taken by each such agency, a statement of the probable impact of such major regulatory action on energy efficiency and energy conservation.

#### (c) Application of provisions to authority exercised to protect public health and safety

Subsection (b) shall not apply to any authority exercised under any provision of law designed to protect the public health or safety.

(Pub. L. 94–163, title III, §382, Dec. 22, 1975, 89 Stat. 939; Pub. L. 103–272, §4(h), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1364.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–272, §4(h)(1), added subsec. (a) and struck out former subsec. (a) which related to reports to Congress by Federal agencies, feasibility of additional savings in energy consumption, and administration of laws permitting inefficient use of energy.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–272, §4(h)(2), substituted "subsection (a)" for "subsection (a)(1)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Abolition of Interstate Commerce Commission and Transfer of Functions

Interstate Commerce Commission abolished and functions of Commission transferred, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, to Surface Transportation Board effective Jan. 1, 1996, by section 1302 of Title 49, Transportation, and section 101 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of Title 49. References to Interstate Commerce Commission deemed to refer to Surface Transportation Board, a member or employee of the Board, or Secretary of Transportation, as appropriate, see section 205 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of Title 49.
1

The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District

of Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 11-1011

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * District of Nebraska.

*

Brandon Gerome Coffman, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: May 11, 2011

Filed: May 27, 2011

___________

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

After the district court1

 granted the government’s Federal Rule of Criminal

Procedure 35(b) motion and reduced the 235-month prison sentence of Brandon

Coffman to 114 months, he filed this appeal arguing that the court should have

granted a greater reduction. Upon careful review, we conclude that this appeal does

not meet the criteria of 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a). See United States v. Haskins, 479 F.3d

955, 957 (8th Cir. 2007) (per curiam). Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to

withdraw, and we dismiss the appeal.

 ______________________
§ 254.41 Training your response personnel. ( a ) You must ensure that the members of your spill-response operating team who are responsible for operating response equipment attend hands-on training classes at least annually. This training must include the deployment and operation of the response equipment they will use. Those responsible for supervising the team must be trained annually in directing the deployment and use of the response equipment.
( b ) You must ensure that the spill-response management team, including the spill-response coordinator and alternates, receives annual training. This training must include instruction on: ( 1 ) Locations, intended use, deployment strategies, and the operational and logistical requirements of response equipment;
( 2 ) Spill reporting procedures;
( 3 ) Oil-spill trajectory analysis and predicting spill movement; and
( 4 ) Any other responsibilities the spill management team may have.
( c ) You must ensure that the qualified individual is sufficiently trained to perform his or her duties.
( d ) You must keep all training certificates and training attendance records at the location designated in your OSRP for at least 2 years. They must be made available to any authorized BSEE representative upon request.
[76 FR 64462, Oct. 18, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 36153, June 6, 2016]
§ 1228.104 Availability of information. ( a ) Under the provisions of this part, information necessary to carry out the activities authorized under the terms of a cooperative agreement will be provided by DOI to the States and Indian tribes entering into such agreements. The information will consist of data provided from all relevant sources on a lease level basis for leases located within the boundaries of the State or Indian tribe which has entered into the agreement. This information will include any records or data held by the lessee or other person that have not been submitted to ONRR, but that affect Federal lease interests and could be required to be submitted under the lease terms or Federal regulations.
( b ) None of the provisions of this subpart should be construed as limiting information already being provided to Indian tribes and allottees regarding their lease interests.
( c ) Information will be provided by ONRR on a monthly basis and will include data on royalties, rents, and bonuses collected on the lease, volumes produced, sales made, value of products disposed of as a sale and used as a basis for royalty calculation, and other information necessary to allow the State or tribe to carry out its responsibilities under the cooperative agreement.
( d ) Proprietary data that is made available to a State or tribe under provisions of 30 U.S.C. 1733 shall be subject to the constraints of 18 U.S.C. 1905. To receive proprietary data, the State or tribe must— ( 1 ) Demonstrate what audit, investigation, or litigation under provisions of 30 U.S.C. 1734 is planned for or underway for which this data is essential;
( 2 ) Demonstrate why this particular data is necessary; and
( 3 ) Agree to safeguard proprietary data as provided.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00034-CR

ADRIAN LOPEZ CAMPOS APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 355TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOOD COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” The motion 

complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this 

motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a), 43.2(f).

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: August 1, 2013
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Charles Lamont, Appellant, against Montgomery Ward & Co. et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00643-CR

Ira Joe Mitchell, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 277TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 09-689-K277, HONORABLE KEN ANDERSON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no

arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State,

573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);

Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1969). Appellant received a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of his right to

examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. See
2

Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Counsel’s motion to withdraw is

granted.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________

Diane M. Henson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson

Affirmed

Filed: July 14, 2010

Do Not Publish
### §44510. Repealed. Pub. L. 118–63, title IV, §401(a), May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1148

Section, Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1181, related to airway science curriculum grants.
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of RADA Electronic Industries Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Zvika Alon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Zvika Alon *
--------------
Zvika Alon
Chief Executive Officer

March 27, 2008

     * The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at
the Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
```
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3488

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain work footwear. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 27, 2005

Mr. RYUN of Kansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain work footwear.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN WORK FOOTWEAR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.64.10 Other work footwear for 

women, with outer soles and 

uppers of rubber or plastics, 

other than house slippers 

and other than tennis shoes, 

basketball shoes, gym shoes, 

training shoes and the like 

(provided for in subheading 

6402.99.18) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 
2

•HR 3488 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1702 When do I accrue decommissioning obligations? You accrue decommissioning obligations when you do any of the following: ( a ) Drill a well;
( b ) Install a platform, pipeline, or other facility;
( c ) Create an obstruction to other users of the OCS;
( d ) Are or become a lessee or the owner of operating rights of a lease on which there is a well that has not been permanently plugged according to this subpart, a platform, a lease term pipeline, or other facility, or an obstruction;
( e ) Are or become a holder of a pipeline right-of-way grant on which there is a pipeline, platform, other facility, or an obstruction;
( f ) Are or become the holder of a right-of-use and easement grant on which there is a well, pipeline, platform, other facility, or an obstruction; or
( g ) Re-enter a well that was previously plugged according to this subpart.
[76 FR 64462, Oct. 18, 2011, as amended at 88 FR 23580, Apr. 18, 2023]
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), Michael J. Barrist, Chief Executive Officer of NCO Group, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) that: 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                   |   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|------------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: November 9, 2006 |   |   | /s/ Michael J. Barrist                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|                   |   |   |  

 

 

Michael J. BarristChief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. |
§ 56.6310 Misfire waiting period. When a misfire is suspected, persons shall not enter the blast area— ( a ) For 30 minutes if safety fuse and blasting caps are used;
( b ) For 15 minutes if any other type detonators are used; or
( c ) For 30 minutes if electronic detonators are used, or for the manufacturer-recommended time, whichever is longer.
[61 FR 36795, July 12, 1996, as amended at 85 FR 2027, Jan. 14, 2020]
§ 203.84 What is in a net revenue and relief justification report? This report presents cash flow data for 12 qualifying months, using the format specified in the “Guidelines for the Application, Review, Approval, and Administration of Royalty Relief for End-of-Life Leases”, U.S. Department of the Interior, BSEE. Qualifying months for an oil and gas lease are the most recent 12 months out of the last 15 months that you produced at least 100 BOE per day on average. Qualifying months for other than oil and gas leases are the most recent 12 of the last 15 months having some production. ( a ) The cash flow table you submit must include historical data for: ( 1 ) Lease production subject to royalty;
( 2 ) Total revenues;
( 3 ) Royalty payments out of production;
( 4 ) Total allowable costs; and
( 5 ) Transportation and processing costs.
( b ) Do not include in your cash flow table the non-allowable costs listed at 30 CFR 1220.013 or: ( 1 ) OCS rental payments on the lease(s) in the application;
( 2 ) Damages and losses;
( 3 ) Taxes;
( 4 ) Any costs associated with exploratory activities;
( 5 ) Civil or criminal fines or penalties;
( 6 ) Fees for your royalty relief application; and
( 7 ) Costs associated with existing obligations (e.g., royalty overrides or other forms of payment for acquiring the lease, depreciation on previously acquired equipment or facilities).
( c ) We may, in reviewing and evaluating your application, disallow costs when you have not shown they are necessary to operate the lease, or if they are inconsistent with end-of-life operations.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**In the Matter of**

**MICHELLE H. ASH**

**PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT FROM RETIRED STATUS**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: No. 166 DB 2014 (No. 8 RST 2015)** 

**Attorney Registration No. 66998** 

**(Out of State)**

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 15 th**  **day of January, 2015, the Report and Recommendation of**  **Disciplinary Board Member dated January 6, 2015, is appr oved and it is ORDERED that**  **Michelle H. Ash, who has been on Retired Status, has never been suspended or**  **disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications, competency and**  **learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is,**  **hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Ba r of this Commonwealth. The**  **expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall**  **be paid by the Petitioner.**