alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 20.14 Instructions for handling future changes in lamp design. All approvals are granted with the understanding that the manufacturer will make the lamp according to the drawings submitted to MSHA, which have been considered and included in the approval. Therefore, when the manufacturer desires to make any change in the design of the lamp, the manufacturer should first obtain an extension of the original approval to cover the change. The procedure is as follows: ( a ) ( 1 ) The manufacturer shall write to the U.S. Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration, Approval and Certification Center, 765 Technology Drive, Triadelphia, WV 26059, requesting an extension of the original approval and describing the change or changes proposed. With this letter the manufacturer should submit a revised drawing or drawings showing the changes in detail, and one of each of the changed lamp parts.
( 2 ) Where the applicant for approval has used an independent laboratory under part 6 of this chapter to perform, in whole or in part, the necessary testing and evaluation for approval of changes to an approved product under this part, the applicant must provide to MSHA as part of the approval application: ( i ) Written evidence of the laboratory's independence and current recognition by a laboratory accrediting organization;
( ii ) Complete technical explanation of how the product complies with each requirement in the applicable MSHA product approval requirements;
( iii ) Identification of components or features of the product that are critical to the safety of the product; and
( iv ) All documentation, including drawings and specifications, as submitted to the independent laboratory by the applicant and as required by this part.
( b ) MSHA will consider the application and inspect the drawings and parts to determine whether it will be necessary to make any tests.
( c ) If no tests are necessary, the applicant will be advised of the acceptance or rejection of the proposed change by letter from MSHA.
( d ) If tests are judged necessary, the applicant will be advised of the material that will be required.
[Sched. 10C, May 17, 1938, as amended by Supp. 1, 20 FR 2719, Apr. 23, 1955; 43 FR 12314, Mar. 24, 1978; 52 FR 17514, May 8, 1987; 60 FR 35693, July 11, 1995; 68 FR 36420, June 17, 2003; 73 FR 52212, Sept. 9, 2008]
Exhibit 10.24




 




 




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




 




In connection with the Quarterly Report of

On-Site Sourcing Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September

30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date

hereof (the Report), I, Jason Parikh, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,

certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




 




(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)

or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




 




(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all

material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the

Company.




 




 




 




	

  /s/ Jason Parikh


  	

   


  
	

   


  
	

   


  
	

  Jason Parikh


  
	

  Chief Financial Officer


  
	

  November14, 2002
#### Goldie Wiener et al., Respondents, v Samuel Davidson et al., Doing Business as Thelma Realty Co., Appellants.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 8, 1977, which, *inter alia,*set aside a unanimous jury verdict in favor of defendants and directed a new trial. Order reversed and verdict reinstated, with costs. There was no instance of juror misconduct that required that the jury verdict be set aside. When questioned on *voir dire*whether she knew the plaintiff David Wiener, juror Rolnick truthfully responded in the negative. It was not until several days into the trial that she thought she recognized .him and so stated to the other jurors. If Ms. Rolnick’s statements to the other jurors that she possibly recognized plaintiff David Wiener are considered misconduct, it does not justify the court’s setting aside of the unanimous verdict. The evidence at the trial was overwhelmingly in favor of the defendants and there was no prejudice to any of the parties as a result of Ms. Rolnick’s statements. "It is not every irregularity in the conduct of jurors that requires a new trial. The misconduct must be such as to prejudice a party in his substantial rights” *(People*v *Dunbar Contr. Co.,*215 NY 416, 426). In any event, the record makes it clear that there was no prejudice or bias on the part of any of the jurors in reaching their verdict. Further, the trial court’s error was compounded by holding a hearing in the absence of defendants’ counsel. Defendants were thereby deprived of their due process rights to notice and to an opportunity to be heard. Titone, J. P., Gulotta, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
### [§48301. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–254, div. K, title I, §1991(i)(1), Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3645]

Section, added Pub. L. 107–71, title I, §118(c)(1), Nov. 19, 2001, 115 Stat. 627; amended Pub. L. 108–458, title IV, §4029, Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3727; Pub. L. 110–53, title XVI, §1618, Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 489, related to aviation security funding.
## United States Court of Appeals
**For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________

No. 20

- 2822

___________________________

United States of America

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Todd Stands Alone, formerly known as Todd Brave Crow

Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Northern

____________

Submitted: June 18, 2021 Filed: July 20, 2021 [Unpublished]

____________
Before GRUENDER, BE NTON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM

.

After Todd Stands Alone violated the conditions of supervised release , t he
district court 1 sentenced him to 14 months in prison

. On appeal, he challenges the length of the sentence.

1 The Honorable Charles B. Kornmann, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota.-2- As Stands Alone acknowledges

, his recent release from prison moots the appeal. See Owen v. United States , 930 F.3d 989 , 990 (8th Cir. 2019) (holding that release will moot an appeal when the appellant “challenge[s] only his term of imprisonment”)

. N o remedy is available to shorten a term of imprisonment that he has already served

, and no one has identified any collateral consequences

. See i d. ; see also United States v. Dunlap , 719 F.3d 865, 86 6–68 (8th Cir. 2013) (per curiam) ( dismissing an appeal as moot under similar circumstances )

. We accordingly dismiss the appeal

.

______________________________
EXHIBIT32.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Panavision Inc. (the"Company") for the quarterly period endedJune 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the "Report"), Robert L.Beitcher, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Bobby G.Jenkins, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of hisknowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

            /S/ ROBERT L.BEITCHER             Name:Robert L. BeitcherTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer Date: August 12,2005

            /S/ BOBBY G.JENKINS             Name:Bobby G. Jenkins Title:Executive Vice President and            Chief FinancialOfficer Date: August 12, 2005

----
NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
                          AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
                       ----------------------------------
                      ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND BY-LAWS


       The  following  documents  of  Navistar  International   Corporation  are
incorporated herein by reference:

   3.1  Restated   Certificate  of  Incorporation   of  Navistar   International
        Corporation  effective  July 1,  1993,  filed as  Exhibit  3.2 to Annual
        Report on Form 10-K dated  October 31, 1993,  which was filed on January
        27, 1994, Commission File No. 1-9618, and amended as of May 4, 1998.

   3.2  The By-Laws of Navistar  International  Corporation  effective April 14,
        1995,  filed as Exhibit 3.2 on Annual  Report on Form 10-K dated October
        31, 1995, which was filed  on  January 26, 1996, on  Commission File No.
        1-9618.

   3.3  Certificate  of   Designation,   Preferences   and   Rights  of  Junior
        Participating  Preferred  Stock,  Series  A  of  Navistar  International
        Corporation.  Filed  as Exhibit  3.3  to Form 10-Q dated June 11,  1999.
        Commission File No. 1-9618.


                                       E-1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet dated September 30, 1996 and its
Consolidated Statement of Operations covering the period from October 1,
1995 to September 30, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statement and notes thereof.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          115800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    98301
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    8677725
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         3386617
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2288093
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                11027334
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        1874765
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          5918
<OTHER-SE>                                     8702254
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  11027334
<SALES>                                        2116725
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2116725
<CGS>                                           600391
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   600391
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1483711
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              225221
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (36151)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (36251)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (36251)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.01)
        






</TABLE>
#### § 57.11027 Scaffolds and working platforms.

Scaffolds and working platforms shall be of substantial construction and provided with handrails and maintained in good condition. Floorboards shall be laid properly and the scaffolds and working platform shall not be overloaded. Working platforms shall be provided with toeboards when necessary.
#### § 56.12005 Protection of power conductors from mobile equipment.

Mobile equipment shall not run over power conductors, nor shall loads be dragged over power conductors, unless the conductors are properly bridged or protected.
#### S. T. Twomey, appellee, v. Minnie Jones, appellant.

Gen. No. 7,135.

Suit in justice of the peace court to recover first payment made on contract for purchase of real estate. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal to county court. Judgment of justice of the peace affirmed. Appeal from the County Court of Peoria county; the Hon. Arthur C. Fort, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1922.

Reversed with a finding of fact.

Opinion filed August 13, 1923.

Dan R. Sheen, for appellant. Seholes *&*Pratt, for appellee; Henry Kneller, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Jones

delivered the opinion of the court.
§ 57.22104 Open flames (I-C mines). ( a ) Open flames, including cutting and welding, shall not be used underground.
( b ) Welding and cutting shall not be done within 50 feet of a mine opening unless all persons are out of the mine and the mine opening is covered. The cover shall be a substantial material, such as metal or wood, topped with a layer of wetted material to prevent sparks and flames from entering the mine opening.
#### § 56.20011 Barricades and warning signs.

Areas where health or safety hazards exist that are not immediately obvious to employees shall be barricaded, or warning signs shall be posted at all approaches. Warning signs shall be readily visible, legible, and display the nature of the hazard and any protective action required.
EXHIBIT 12.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Elan Sigal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-f of RADA Electronic Industries
Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
Subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Reserved]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2005

/S/ Elan Sigal*
---------------
Elan Sigal
----------
Chief Financial Officer

     * The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at
the Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Leonard Rosenfeld, Philip J. Buckles and James Kelly.

Motions by defendants-appellants to dispense with printing granted only insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard upon the original record, without printing the same, except that a certified copy of the indictment shall be substituted in place of the original indictment, but upon printed appellants’ points; the original record and appellants’ printed points to be filed with this court, on or before December 31, 1960, with notice of argument for the February 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Yalente and McNally, JJ.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9530 

To require the Secretary of Education to establish a program to provide 

for antisemitism monitors at institutions of higher education. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2024 

Mr. TORRES of New York (for himself and Mr. LAWLER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 

Workforce 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Education to establish a program 

to provide for antisemitism monitors at institutions of 

higher education. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘College Oversight and 

5 Legal Updates Mandating Bias Investigations and Ac6 countability Act of 2024’’ or the ‘‘COLUMBIA Act of 

7 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9530 IH

1 SEC. 2. ANTISEMITISM MONITORS. 

2 (a) AUTHORITY.—Not later than 180 days after the 

3 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Education 

4 shall establish a program to appoint independent, third5 party, antisemitism monitors to monitor institutions of 

6 higher education that the Secretary has determined, based 

7 on data received from the Office for Civil Rights of the 

8 Department of Education, have a high incidence of 

9 antisemitic activity and that receive funds under the High10 er Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.). The 

11 Secretary shall develop an antisemitism monitorship 

12 agreement, to be entered into by an antisemitism monitor 

13 and an institution of higher education, that designates the 

14 terms and conditions of the monitorship and that requires 

15 the institution of higher education to provide for the rea16 sonable expenses of the antisemitism monitor. 

17 (b) DUTIES OF ANTISEMITISM MONITOR.—An anti18 semitism monitor appointed to an institution of higher 

19 education by the Secretary of Education shall— 

20 (1) operate under the antisemitism monitorship 

21 agreement developed by the Secretary and entered 

22 into with the institution of higher education; 

23 (2) provide quarterly reports, which shall be 

24 made publicly available and posted on the website of 

25 the institution of higher education and the Depart26 ment of Education, evaluating the progress that the 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 9530 IH

1 institution has made toward combating antisemitism 

2 on campus; and 

3 (3) provide an annual report to Congress, the 

4 Secretary of Education, State and local govern5 ments, as needed, and the institution of higher edu6 cation, that includes recommendations of actions, 

7 policies, and sanctions, as appropriate, to prevent 

8 and reduce antisemitism at the institution. 

9 (c) DEFINITION OF INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDU10 CATION.—In this section, the term ‘‘institution of higher 

11 education’’ has the meaning given such term in section 

12 102 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

13 1002). 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
----

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November 6, 2009 |   /s/ John M. Lowber   |
|------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                   | John M. Lowber              |
|                   | Chief Financial Officer     |
|                   | General Communication, Inc. |

----
Exhibit 32.1

CEOs Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of BancFirst Corporation (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, David E. Rainbolt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ David E. Rainbolt                
|David E. Rainbolt                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)        
|March 15, 2011