alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §571. Regulatory treatment of video programming services

#### (a) Limitations on cable regulation

#### (1) Radio-based systems

To the extent that a common carrier (or any other person) is providing video programming to subscribers using radio communication, such carrier (or other person) shall be subject to the requirements of subchapter III and section 572 of this title, but shall not otherwise be subject to the requirements of this subchapter.

#### (2) Common carriage of video traffic

To the extent that a common carrier is providing transmission of video programming on a common carrier basis, such carrier shall be subject to the requirements of subchapter II and section 572 of this title, but shall not otherwise be subject to the requirements of this subchapter. This paragraph shall not affect the treatment under section 522(7)(C) of this title of a facility of a common carrier as a cable system.

#### (3) Cable systems and open video systems

To the extent that a common carrier is providing video programming to its subscribers in any manner other than that described in paragraphs (1) and (2)—

(A) such carrier shall be subject to the requirements of this subchapter, unless such programming is provided by means of an open video system for which the Commission has approved a certification under section 573 of this title; or

(B) if such programming is provided by means of an open video system for which the Commission has approved a certification under section 573 of this title, such carrier shall be subject to the requirements of this part, but shall be subject to parts I through IV of this subchapter only as provided in 573(c) of this title.

#### (4) Election to operate as open video system

A common carrier that is providing video programming in a manner described in paragraph (1) or (2), or a combination thereof, may elect to provide such programming by means of an open video system that complies with section 573 of this title. If the Commission approves such carrier's certification under section 573 of this title, such carrier shall be subject to the requirements of this part, but shall be subject to parts I through IV of this subchapter only as provided in 573(c) of this title.

#### (b) Limitations on interconnection obligations

A local exchange carrier that provides cable service through an open video system or a cable system shall not be required, pursuant to subchapter II of this chapter, to make capacity available on a nondiscriminatory basis to any other person for the provision of cable service directly to subscribers.

#### (c) Additional regulatory relief

A common carrier shall not be required to obtain a certificate under section 214 of this title with respect to the establishment or operation of a system for the delivery of video programming.

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title VI, §651, as added Pub. L. 104–104, title III, §302(a), Feb. 8, 1996, 110 Stat. 118.)
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 21, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-40917 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CEDRIC DWAYNE MASON, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:03-CR-38-1-RC-WCR

-------------------- Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Cedric Dwayne Mason appeals the sentence imposed following his conviction for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base. He contends that he should have received a reduction in his offense level for acceptance of responsibility, even though he was arrested for similar conduct while on bail for the instant offense. He also failed to comply with other terms of pretrial release, and he had to be arrested to compel his presence at pretrial proceedings.No. 04-40917 -2- Mason did not carry his burden of showing that the district court committed clear error by refusing to reduce his sentence for acceptance of responsibility. See United States v. Flucas , 99 F.3d 177, 180 (5th Cir. 1996). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
11P-0094-v4-1

11P-0094-v4-1

3M Company

St. Paul, Minnesota

Perfluorooctanoic Acid

(PFOA) 

Site Related Environmental 

Assessment Program

October 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011 

Quarterly Status Report

3M and Dyneon LLC

Decatur, Alabama

3M Company

St. Paul, Minnesota

Perfluorooctanoic Acid

(PFOA) 

Site Related Environmental 

Assessment Program

October 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011 

Quarterly Status Report

3M and Dyneon LLC

Decatur, Alabama
AMENDMENT
DATED JULY 12, 2001
TO THE PROSPECTUS AND STATEMENT OF
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
OF BERWYN INCOME FUND
SERIES OF THE BERWYN FUNDS
DATED MAY 1, 2001

A redemption fee of 1% will be charged on the redemption of shares
held for less than six months.  The redemption fee will apply to shares
purchased on or after November 1, 2001.   The fee will not apply to
shares purchased through the reinvestment of dividends or capital
gains distributions.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATION*

I, William A. Owen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Outdoor Channel
Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting

Date: May 12, 2005               /s/ William A. Owen
                                 --------------------------------------------
                                 WILLIAM A. OWEN, Chief Financial Officer


                                       92
### SUBCHAPTER I—CIVIL PENALTIES
#### KUSHES, Appellant, v. GINSBERG, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 23, 1903.)

Action by Fanny Kushes against Isidore Ginsberg.

B. Tuska, for appellant.

C. S. Petrasch, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
§ 550.268 How does BOEM respond to recommendations? ( a ) *Governor.* The Regional Supervisor will accept those recommendations from the Governor that provide a reasonable balance between the National interest and the well-being of the citizens of each affected State. The Regional Supervisor will explain in writing to the Governor the reasons for rejecting any of his or her recommendations.
( b ) *Local governments and the public.* The Regional Supervisor may accept recommendations from the executive of any affected local government or the public.
( c ) *Availability.* The Regional Supervisor will make all comments and recommendations available to the public upon request.
### §20504. Inspection, testing, and investigation

(a) Systems in Use.—(1) The Secretary of Transportation may—

(A) inspect and test a signal system used by a railroad carrier; and

(B) decide whether the system is in safe operating condition.

(2) In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary may employ only an individual who—

(A) has no interest in a patented article required to be used on or with a signal system; and

(B) has no financial interest in a railroad carrier or in a concern dealing in railroad supplies.

(b) Systems Submitted for Investigation and Testing.—The Secretary may investigate, test, and report on the use of and need for a signal system, without cost to the United States Government, when the system is submitted in completed shape for investigation and testing.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 884.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20504(a) | 49 App.:26(d). | Feb. 4, 1887, ch. 104, 24 Stat. 379, §25(d); added Feb. 28, 1920, ch. 91, §441, 41 Stat. 498; restated Aug. 26, 1937, ch. 818, 50 Stat. 836; Sept. 18, 1940, ch. 722, §14(b), 54 Stat. 919; June 22, 1988, Pub. L. 100–342, §17(4), (8), 102 Stat. 635, 636. |
| | 49 App.:1655(e)(6)(A). | Oct. 15, 1966, Pub. L. 89–670, §6(e)(1)(I), (6)(A), 80 Stat. 939. |
| 20504(b) | 45:36. | May 27, 1908, ch. 200, §1 (1st complete par. on p. 325), 35 Stat. 325. |
| | 49 App.:1655(e)(1)(I). | |

Section

In subsection (a)(1)(B), the words "safe operating condition" are substituted for "proper condition to operate and provide adequate safety" to eliminate unnecessary words.

In subsection (a)(2), before clause (A), the text of 49:26(d) (2d sentence) is omitted because of 5:3101. The text of 49:26(d) (3d sentence) is omitted because of 5:ch. 33. The words "In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary may employ" are substituted for "shall be used for such purpose" for clarity. In clause (A), the words "either directly or indirectly" are omitted as surplus.

In subsection (b), the word "experimentally" is omitted as surplus. The words "signal system" are substituted for "any appliances or systems intended to promote the safety of railway operation" because of the definition of "signal system" in section 20501 of the revised title. The text of 45:36 (last sentence) is omitted because of 49:323.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 238 (Thursday, December 10, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 79496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27178]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4569-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2020-0001]


California; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of California (FEMA-4569-DR), dated October 16, 2020, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued November 25, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of California is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of October 16, 2020.

    Del Norte County for Public Assistance, including direct federal 
assistance.
    Fresno, Madera, Mendocino, Napa, Shasta, Siskiyou, and Sonoma 
Counties for debris removal [Category A] and permanent work 
[Categories C-G] (already designated for Individual Assistance and 
emergency protective measures [Category B], including direct federal 
assistance, under the Public Assistance program).
    Yuba County for debris removal and emergency protective measures 
(Categories A and B), including direct federal assistance, under the 
Public Assistance program.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Pete Gaynor,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2020-27178 Filed 12-9-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
EXHIBIT 10.1

                                                                         FORM TX
                                                 For a Nondramatic Literary Work
                                                  UNITED STATES COPYRIGHT OFFICE

                                                  EFFECTIVE DATE OF REGISTRATION


1. TITLE OF THIS WORK
   BRAZIL HARDWARE AND SYSTEMS MONITORING SOFTWARE

2. NAME OF AUTHOR
   INTELLINGER SOFTWARE CORPORATION

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                   <C>                          <C>
   Was this contribution to the        Author's Nationality         Was the Contribution
   work a "work made for hire"?        or Domicile                  to the Work
   [X] Yes                             Citizen of      [US]         Anonymous     [ ] Yes  [X] No
   [ ] No                              Domiciled in    [US]         Pseudonymous  [ ] Yes  [X] No
</TABLE>

   NATURE OF AUTHORSHIP
   COMPUTER PROGRAM

3. Year in Which Creation of this Work was Completed
   200x

4. COPYRIGHT CLAIMANT(S)                                    APPLICATION RECEIVED
   INTELLINGER SOFTWARE CORPORATION
   500 DAMONTE RANCH PARKWAY, SUITE 1056                    ONE DEPOSIT RECEIVED
   RENO, NV 89511

CORRESPONDENCE

INTELLINGER SOFTWARE CORPORATION
500 DAMONTE RANCH PARKWAY, SUITE 1056
RENO, NV 89511
775-352-7900
bwalker@intellinger.com

CERTIFICATION

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the authorized agent of Intellinger
Software Corporation

Brett Walker                        9/20/02
/s/ Brett Walker
§ 27.39 Tests to determine resistance to vibration. ( a ) *Laboratory tests for reliability and durability.* Components, subassemblies, or assemblies that are to be mounted on permissible and approved equipment shall be subjected to two separate vibration tests, each of one-hour duration. The first test shall be conducted at a frequency of 30 cycles per second with a total movement per cycle of 1 ⁄ 16-inch. The second test shall be conducted at a frequency of 15 cycles per second with a total movement per cycle of 1 ⁄ 8-inch. Components, subassemblies, and assemblies shall be secured to the vibration testing equipment in their normal operating positions (with shock mounts, if regularly provided with shock mounts). Each component, subassembly and assembly shall function normally during and after each vibration test. Note:
The vibrating equipment is designed to impart a circular motion in a plane inclined 45° to the vertical or horizontal.
( b ) *Field tests.* MSHA reserves the right to conduct tests to determine resistance to vibration in underground workings to verify the reliability and durability of a methane-monitoring system or component(s) thereof where installed in connection with a piece of mining equipment.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134240 & (12) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134240 

 COA: 276922 

Genesee CC: 05-016601-FH 

JONATHON ALLEN MAYBERRY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 30, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to remand to 

the trial court is DENIED. 

KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons given in her dissent in 

People v Conway, 474 Mich 1140 (2006). 

p0830 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2007 

 Clerk
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9463 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require that non-citizen appointees 

to positions in the Veterans Health Administration are subjected to 

background investigations prior to employment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 6, 2024 

Mr. WENSTRUP introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require that 

non-citizen appointees to positions in the Veterans 

Health Administration are subjected to background investigations prior to employment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Recruitment Improve5 ment for Service Excellence at VA Hospitals Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘RISE Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9463 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT THAT NON-CITIZEN APPOINTEES IN 

2 VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION ARE 

3 SUBJECTED TO BACKGROUND INVESTIGA4 TIONS PRIOR TO EMPLOYMENT. 

5 Section 7407(a) of title 38, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) by inserting (1) before ‘‘When’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

9 paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(2) A person may not be appointed under paragraph 

11 (1) unless the person has been subjected to a background 

12 investigation.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
### §41746. Tracking service

The Secretary of Transportation shall require a carrier that provides essential air service to an eligible place and that receives compensation for such service under this subchapter to report not less than semiannually—

(1) the percentage of flights to and from the place that arrive on time as defined by the Secretary; and

(2) such other information as the Secretary considers necessary to evaluate service provided to passengers traveling to and from such place.

(Added Pub. L. 108–176, title IV, §407, Dec. 12, 2003, 117 Stat. 2545.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable only to fiscal years beginning after Sept. 30, 2003, except as otherwise specifically provided, see section 3 of Pub. L. 108–176, set out as an Effective Date of 2003 Amendment note under section 106 of this title.
#### Universal Vending Service Company, appellee, v. Mrs. Marco Alishahon, appellant.

Gen. No. 28,580.

Consolidated with No. 28,578 ante. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Henry M. Walker, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed November 27, 1923.

Per Curiam.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3495 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3495

  For the relief of Thomas W. Sikes and Wellington Trade, Inc., doing 
                      business as Containerhouse.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2005

 Mr. Norwood introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  For the relief of Thomas W. Sikes and Wellington Trade, Inc., doing 
                      business as Containerhouse.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGES.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of 
any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $990,500 to the 
persons named in subsection (b) for damages sustained by such persons 
in connection with a 1991 government contract for the purchase and 
delivery of certain ocean freight containers.
    (b) Persons to Receive Compensation.--The Secretary of the Treasury 
shall compensate the following persons under subsection (a):
            (1) Thomas W. Sikes of Cadwell, Georgia.
            (2) Wellington Trade Inc., of Cornelia, Georgia, doing 
        business as Containerhouse.

SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES.

    Payment under section 1 shall constitute full settlement of all 
legal and equitable claims by the persons named in section 1(b) against 
the United States for the damages described in section 1(a).

SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEY AND AGENT FEES.

    Not more than 10 percent of the payment made under section 1 may be 
paid to or received by an agent or attorney as consideration for any 
service rendered in connection with this Act. Each violation of this 
section is punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000.
                                 <all>
```