alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of NeoMedia  Technologies,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: November 4, 2004                          By: /s/ David A. Dodge
                                                    --------------------------
                                                Name: David A. Dodge
                                                Title: Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to NeoMedia  Technologies,
Inc. and will be retained by NeoMedia  Technologies,  Inc. and  furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### **CHAPTER 25—ARMED FORCES RESERVE**
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 

RECONNAISSANCE GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE 

MT. BLACKBURN QUADRANGLE, 

TRANSANTARCTIC MOUNTAINS, 

ANTARCTICA 

By Edmund Stump, J. H. Smit 

and Stephen Self 

Prepared by the 

UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 

Under the auspices of the 

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 

U.S. ANTARCTIC RESEARCH PROGRAM MAP 

Published by the U.S. Geological Survey, 1985 

Reston, Virginia 22092 

(J) 

-i 

c 

3: 

'"0 

)> 

z 

0 

0 

-i 

:I 

m 

:::0 

(J) 

~ m 

() 

0 

z 

?Z 

C) 

m 

0 

! 

3: 

)> 

_'"0 

:s: 

:-1 

O:J 

r 

)> 

() 

" O:J 

c 

:::0 

z 

,0 

c 

)> 

9 

)> 

z 

-i 

)> 

:::0 

() 

-i 

?5 

)> 

...... 

1'\:) 

c.n 

_o 

0 

0 

0 

:s: 

)> 

'"0 

)> 

I 

....... 

1'\:)
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.460 What are the requirements for conducting a well test? ( a ) If you intend to conduct a well test, you must include your projected plans for the test with your APD (form BSEE-0123) or in an Application for Permit to Modify (APM) (form BSEE-0124). Your plans must include at least the following information: ( 1 ) Estimated flowing and shut-in tubing pressures;
( 2 ) Estimated flow rates and cumulative volumes;
( 3 ) Time duration of flow, buildup, and drawdown periods;
( 4 ) Description and rating of surface and subsurface test equipment;
( 5 ) Schematic drawing, showing the layout of test equipment;
( 6 ) Description of safety equipment, including gas detectors and fire-fighting equipment;
( 7 ) Proposed methods to handle or transport produced fluids; and
( 8 ) Description of the test procedures.
( b ) You must give the District Manager at least 24-hours notice before starting a well test.
### §31317. Procedure for prescribing regulations

Regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Transportation to carry out this chapter (except section 31307) shall be prescribed under section 553 of title 5 without regard to sections 556 and 557 of title 5.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1029.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 31317 | 49 App.:2715. | Oct. 27, 1986, Pub. L. 99–570, §12018, 100 Stat. 3207–187. |

Section

The text of 49 App.:2715(a) is omitted as surplus because of 49:322(a). The words "(except section 31307)" are added because the source provisions restated in this section do not apply to the source provisions restated in section 31307 of the revised title.
### §301a. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–468, title VI, §615(a)(2), Jan. 14, 1983, 96 Stat. 2578

Section, act June 24, 1946, ch. 465, 60 Stat. 304, provided that funds available for operation of Alaska Railroad were available for other specified purposes.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal by Pub. L. 97–468 effective on date of transfer of Alaska Railroad to the State [Jan. 5, 1985], pursuant to section 1203 of Title 45, Railroads, see section 615(b) of Pub. L. 97–468.
#### Albert M. Zlotnick v. Caribbean and Southeastern Development Corporation.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before August 14, 1962 with notice of argument for the September 1962 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00403-CV

SHARLENE BAKER, Appellant

V.

FERRIER BUILDERS, INC., Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 3

of Tarrant County (2021-005391-3)

August 22, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the trial court’s judgment 

is affirmed.

It is further ordered that Appellant Sharlene Baker must pay all costs of this 

appeal.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Elizabeth Kerr__________________

 Justice Elizabeth Kerr
### §123. Scope; special rules

(a) Act Does Not Supersede Customer's Liability to Taxing Jurisdiction.—Nothing in sections 116 through 126 modifies, impairs, supersedes, or authorizes the modification, impairment, or supersession of, any law allowing a taxing jurisdiction to collect a tax, charge, or fee from a customer that has failed to provide its place of primary use.

(b) Additional Taxable Charges.—If a taxing jurisdiction does not otherwise subject charges for mobile telecommunications services to taxation and if these charges are aggregated with and not separately stated from charges that are subject to taxation, then the charges for nontaxable mobile telecommunications services may be subject to taxation unless the home service provider can reasonably identify charges not subject to such tax, charge, or fee from its books and records that are kept in the regular course of business.

(c) Nontaxable Charges.—If a taxing jurisdiction does not subject charges for mobile telecommunications services to taxation, a customer may not rely upon the nontaxability of charges for mobile telecommunications services unless the customer's home service provider separately states the charges for nontaxable mobile telecommunications services from taxable charges or the home service provider elects, after receiving a written request from the customer in the form required by the provider, to provide verifiable data based upon the home service provider's books and records that are kept in the regular course of business that reasonably identifies the nontaxable charges.

(Added Pub. L. 106–252, §2(a), July 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 630.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act, referred to in subsec. (a), probably means the Mobile Telecommunications Sourcing Act, Pub. L. 106–252, July 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 626, which enacted sections 116 to 126 of this title and provisions set out as notes under sections 1 and 116 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 2000 Amendment note set out under section 1 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date; Application of Amendment

Section effective July 28, 2000, and applicable only to customer bills issued after the first day of the first month beginning more than 2 years after July 28, 2000, see section 3 of Pub. L. 106–252, set out as a note under section 116 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9476 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9476

 To condition the availability of Federal funds to Turkey on a formal 
  apology for the attack on September 2, 2024, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 6, 2024

  Mrs. Luna introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To condition the availability of Federal funds to Turkey on a formal 
  apology for the attack on September 2, 2024, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON FEDERAL FUNDS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Federal funds may be 
obligated, expended, or otherwise made available to Turkey until the 
Government of Turkey issues a formal apology for the attack on United 
States Marines on September 2, 2024.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# TIME AND DATE: 

10:00 a.m., Thursday, December 17, 2020.

# PLACE: 

                        Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, the meeting will be open to the public via live webcast only. Visit the agency's homepage (                        *www.ncua.gov.*) and access the provided webcast link.                    

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. NCUA Rules and Regulations, Field of Membership Shared Facility Requirements.

2. NCUA Rules and Regulations, Regulatory Relief in Response to COVID-19.

3. NCUA Rules and Regulations, Mortgage Servicing Rights.

4. NUCA Rules and Regulations, Overdraft Policy.

5. NCUA Rules and Regulations, Subordinated Debt.

6. Board Briefing, Share Insurance Fund 2021 Normal Operating Level.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2020-27616 Filed 12-11-20; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
§ 1227.600 What automated verification functions may a State perform? Automated verification involves systematic monitoring of production and royalty reports to identify and resolve reporting or payment discrepancies. States may perform the following: ( a ) Automated comparison of sales volumes reported by royalty reporters to sales and transfer volumes reported by production reporters. If you request delegation of automated comparison of sales and production volumes, you must perform at least the following functions: ( 1 ) Performing an initial sales volume comparison between royalty and production reports;
( 2 ) Performing subsequent comparisons when reporters adjust royalty or production reports;
( 3 ) Checking unit prices for reasonable product valuation based on reference price ranges ONRR provides;
( 4 ) Resolving volume variances using written correspondence, telephone inquiries, or other media;
( 5 ) Maintaining appropriate file documentation to support case resolution; and
( 6 ) Issuing orders to correct reports or payments;
( b ) Any one or more of the following additional automated verification functions: ( 1 ) Verifying compliance with lease financial terms, such as payment of rent, minimum royalty, and advance royalty;
( 2 ) Identifying and resolving improper adjustments;
( 3 ) Identifying late payments and insufficient estimates, including calculating interest owed to ONRR and verifying payor-calculated interest owed to ONRR;
( 4 ) Calculating interest due to a lessee or its designee for an adjustment or refund, including identifying overpayments and excessive estimates;
( 5 ) Verifying royalty rates; and
( 6 ) Verifying compliance with transportation and processing allowance limitations;
( c ) Issuing notices and bills associated with any of the functions under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section; and
( d ) Providing assistance to ONRR for any of these delegated functions on appealed demands or orders, including meeting timeframes, supplying information, using the appropriate format, taking remanded actions, modifying orders, and providing oral and written briefing and testimony as expert witnesses.
#### § 43.3 Purpose and scope of this part.

This part sets forth the procedures for giving notice to the Secretary under section 103(g)(1) of the Act, for responding to such notices and for reviewing refusals by authorized representatives of the Secretary to issue citations or orders under section 103 (g)(1) or (g)(2). Specifically, Subpart B details the steps to be taken by a representative of miners or a miner in making a request for a special inspection and by the Secretary in processing and taking action on such a request under section 103(g)(1). Subpart C sets forth informal review procedures which a representative of miners or a miner may request under sections 103 (g)(1) and (g)(2) where no citation or order is issued under those sections.
The Number of Juveniles in Residential 

Placement Continued to Decline in 2013

Challenges remain to reduce racial and ethnic disparities and confinement of youth who commit less serious offenses

Minority youth accounted for 68% of youth in 

residential placement in 2013

Proportion of petitioned cases referred

Age

Gender

Race/

ethnicity

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

14% 17% 26% 28% 15%

86% 14%

32% 40% 23% 5%

White Black Hispanic Other

Male Female

Under 15 15 16 17 18-20

Percent of youth in residential placement

}

68%

Less than 40% of juveniles in placement in 2013 

were held for a person offense

Person

37%

Property

24%

Technical

violations

17%

Public

order

11%

Drugs

6%

Status

offense

5%

The number of juveniles in residential placement fell 

50% between 1999 and 2013

10/97 10/99 10/01 10/03 02/06 10/07 02/10 10/11 10/13

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

Census date

Youth in residential placement

Total

Detained

Committed

107,493

77,835

28,576

54,148

35,659

17,803

Despite declines, the placement rate for minority 

youth was 2.7 times that of white youth in 2013

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

White Minority Ratio

Youth in placement per 100,000 youth ages

10–upper age of juvenile court jurisdiction 

10/97 10/99 10/01 10/03 02/06 10/07 02/10 10/11 10/13

Census date

Ratio of rates

(minority to white)

3.5

2.7

Juvenile placement rates declined in every state from 

2006 to 2013; 9 states cut their rates by half or more

50% or greater

40% to 49%

25% to 39%

Percent decline in 

placement rates, 

2006–2013 

DC

Note: Total includes detained youth, committed youth, and a small less than 25%

number of youth in placement as part of a diversion agreement.

Access more information on juveniles in placement

n Review FAQs about juveniles in corrections

n Analyze data with Easy Access to the Census of 

Juveniles in Residential Placement

n View the glossary of terms, methods, and data 

collection questionnaires

Data source: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. 

Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement [machine-readable 

data files]. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau (producer). 

Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

Note: Other race includes American Indian/Alaskan Natives, Asian/

Pacific Islanders, and youth of unknown race.

ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb
#### § 27.3 Consultation.

By appointment, applicants or their representatives may visit the U.S. Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration, Approval and Certification Center, 765 Technology Drive, Triadelphia, WV 26059, to discuss with qualified MSHA personnel proposed methane-monitoring systems to be submitted in accordance with the regulations of this part. No charge is made for such consultation and no written report thereof will be made to the applicant.

[31 FR 10607, Aug. 9, 1966, as amended at 43 FR 12316, Mar. 24, 1978; 60 FR 35694, July 11, 1995; 73 FR 52212, Sept. 9, 2008]
For inclusion in docket no. EPA–HQ–OAR–2007–0492, Review of Particulate Matter National Ambient Air

Quality Standards (NAAQS)

EPA Meeting Summary

Date of Meeting: August 20, 2012

Topic: Discuss PM NAAQS proposed rule section on Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD)

Attendees: Representatives from the following state and local air agencies:

Connecticut (Anne Gobin)

New York (Dave Shaw)

Maryland (Tad Aburn)

Allegheny County, PA (Jim Thompson)

Georgia (Jac Capp)

Indiana (Keith Baugues)

Louisiana (Tegan Treadaway)

Kansas (Rick Brunetti)

Linn County, Iowa (Jim Hodina)

Colorado (Garry Kaufman)

California

– CARB (Lynn Terry)

Sacramento, CA (Larry Greene)

Great Basin Air District, CA (Ted Schade)

Puget Sound, WA (Craig Kenworthy)

Nancy Kruger (National Association of Clean Air Agencies)

EPA representatives: Michael Ling, Rich Damberg, Anna Wood, Raj Rao, Peter Keller, Dan deRoeck, Tyler

Fox, James Hemby, Sara Schneeberg, Brian Doster

Summary of Meeting: EPA staff presented a summary of the PSD

‐ related elements of the June 2012 PM

NAAQS proposed revisions. State and local air agency representatives asked questions and made

suggestions about the proposed PSD program revisions and related implementation issues. EPA

indicated that for formal consideration of their comments, air agency representatives would need to

submit their comments during the public comment period of the PM NAAQS rulemaking.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

Octo ber 12 , 2016 

# Order

Clerk Octo ber 12 , 2016

15 3976 ( 43 )

ALBERT KOSIS

, Plaintiff

- Appell ee

, SC: 15 3976

v COA: 32 6211

Wayne CC : 1 3

- 0 1 5060

- NO

CITY OF LIVONIA

, Defendant

- Appell ant

.

________ __________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of the Michigan County Road

Commission Self

- Insurance Pool to participate as amicus curiae and submit a brief in

support of defendant

- appellant’s application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. T he

amicus brief submitted on September 30 , 2016 , is accepted for fi ling

.
#### § 56.19018 Overtravel by-pass switches.

When an overtravel by-pass switch is installed, the switch shall function so as to allow the conveyance to be moved through the overtravel position when the switch is held in the closed position by the hoistman. The overtravel by-pass switch shall return automatically to the open position when released by the hoistman.

[50 FR 4054, Jan. 29, 1985; 50 FR 20100, May 14, 1985]
### §15723. Reports by carriers, lessors, and associations

(a) Filing of Reports.—The Board may require pipeline carriers, lessors, and associations, or classes of them as the Board may prescribe, to file annual, periodic, and special reports with the Board containing answers to questions asked by it.

(b) Under Oath.—Any report under this section shall be made under oath.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §106(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 926.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 11145 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3483

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain footwear. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 27, 2005

Mr. RYUN of Kansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain footwear.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN FOOTWEAR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.64.22 Footwear, other than for 

men, with outer soles of 

leather or composition leather, valued not over $2.50 per 

pair (provided for in subheading 6404.20.20) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 
2

•HR 3483 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-3941

___________ Neil Lewis, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Roberts Dairy Company, LLC, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: June 18, 2004 Filed: July 26, 2004

___________ Before SMITH, BEAM, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. After his termination from employment with the Roberts Dairy Company ("Roberts"), Neil Lewis brought a claim of age and disability discrimination against his former employer. Lewis's discrimination claims were submitted to the district court 1 on the record that existed after a jury trial in which the jury failed to reach a verdict on the merits of his case. The district court concluded that Lewis's termination was based on a legitimate business reason and entered judgment in favor of Roberts.-2- The district court also found that Lewis failed to establish that he was disabled and that Lewis's termination was not based on his age. Lewis claims that the district court's factual findings were clearly erroneous and urges this court to overturn the district court's dismissal of his discrimination claims. Having carefully reviewed the record, we find no error in the trial court's disposition of this matter. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________