alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lloyd Callahan, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from two judgments of the former Court of Special Sessions of the City-of New York, County of Queens, rendered May 23, 1962 after a nonjury trial, convicting him of malicious mischief and assault third degree; and, on each conviction, sentencing him to an indeterminate term in the New York City Reformatory, with a recommendation that he serve six months, and directing that the two sentences shall be served concurrently. *890.Judgment convicting defendant of malicious mischief reversed on the law and the facts; information dismissed; and defendant discharged (with respect to the charge in such information). There was no evidence that the injury to the property was willful, as required by the statute (Penal Law, § 1483; cf. *People*v. *Broady,*5 N Y 2d 500, 506-507). Judgment convicting defendant of assault third degree, modified on the law by vacating the sentence; and defendant remanded to the trial court for resentence pursuant to law and not inconsistent herewith. As so modified, such judgment is affirmed. No questions of fact were considered incident to this modification. The trial court having imposed an indefinite term, it was without authority as a matter of law to add as an incident to such sentence its recommendation that defendant shall remain in prison for any definite period of time; such a recommendation by the trial court is nugatory *(People*v. *Tower,*308 N. Y. 123, 125). In this case, since the probation report is not before us, we express no opinion as to the kind or the duration of the term which would be appropriate upon the defendant’s resentence. Beldoek, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned hereby certifies that (i) the foregoing Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A filed by
August 16, 2010 for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                      |  |                                              
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Date: August 16, 2010 |  | /s/ Ronald Leon Moore                        
|                      |  | Ronald Leon Moore                            
|                      |  | Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
|                      | 
|Date: August 16, 2010 |  | /s/ J. Alan Dickerson                        
|                      |  | J. Alan Dickerson                            
|                      |  | Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM – Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management D istrict

Rule No(s): 109 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Amended April 20 ,2010

Rule Title(s): Recordkeeping for Volatile Organic Compound

Date Submitted to ARB: May 13, 2010

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): May 17, 2005

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Julie McKeehan Phone Number: (661) 723-8070 E-mail Address: jmckeehan@avaqmd.ca.gov

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

Rule 109 was amended to include an alternative reco rdkeeping method of addressing certain industry pra ctices,

and to update the rule applicability list.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when imp lemented, will result in quantifiable changes in em issions. Attach reference(s) for emission

factor(s) and other information. Attach calculatio n sheet showing how the emission information provid ed below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Sourc e Category:

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissio ns: Area Affected:

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) :CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measu re:

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the C ontrol Measure:

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any):

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed):

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluati on Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emis sion forecasting and

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Source s Affected by this Amendment: No change

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100 %

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: No change Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100 %

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : N/A

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Cont inuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Re ductions are:

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): N/A Work Practice Standards in Section(s): N/A

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): (C) Reporting Requirements in Section(s): N/A5/1/2002 CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 3

(Electronic Format)

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: The amendment does not change any cont rol requirements. This is a procedural change in r eporting periods

and protocol.
### §2369. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title X, §1055(f), Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2462, as amended by Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title X, §1075(d)(13), Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4373

Section, Pub. L. 104–293, title VII, §722, as added Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title XII, §1209(a), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2668, related to semiannual report on contributions of foreign persons to weapons of mass destruction and delivery systems efforts of countries of proliferation concern.
### [§§24707, 24708. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–134, title I, §101(d), (e), Dec. 2, 1997, 111 Stat. 2572]

Section 24707, Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 928, required annual route, financial, and performance reviews.

Section 24708, Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 929, related to continuing, modifying, or discontinuing passenger transportation routes.
#### § 56.6605 Isolation of blasting circuits.

Lead wires and blasting lines shall be isolated and insulated from power conductors, pipelines, and railroad tracks, and shall be protected from sources of stray or static electricity. Blasting circuits shall be protected from any contact between firing lines and overhead powerlines which could result from the force of a blast.
```

[House Report 115-50]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]



115th Congress     }                                {         Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session       }                                {          115-50

======================================================================

 
   PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL (H.R. 372) TO RESTORE THE 
  APPLICATION OF THE FEDERAL ANTITRUST LAWS TO THE BUSINESS OF HEALTH 
             INSURANCE TO PROTECT COMPETITION AND CONSUMERS

                                _______
                                

   March 20, 2017.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

         Mr. Collins of Georgia, from the Committee on Rules, 
                        submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 209]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 209, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 372, the 
Competitive Health Insurance Reform Act of 2017, under a closed 
rule. The resolution provides one hour of debate equally 
divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member 
of the Committee on the Judiciary. The resolution waives all 
points of order against consideration of the bill. The 
resolution provides that an amendment in the nature of a 
substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 115-
8 shall be considered as adopted and the bill, as amended, 
shall be considered as read. The resolution waives all points 
of order against provisions in the bill, as amended. The 
resolution provides one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.

                         EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

    Although the resolution waives all points of order against 
consideration of the bill, the Committee is not aware of any 
points of order. The waiver is prophylactic in nature.
    Although the resolution waives all points of order against 
provisions in the bill, as amended, the Committee is not aware 
of any points of order. The waiver is prophylactic in nature.

                                  [all]
```
EXHIBIT 10.2

UC Case Nos. 92-283, 92-383 & 96-036

                       FIRST AMENDMENT TO OPTION AGREEMENT

      This first amendment to the Option Agreement ("Amendment") is effective
this 9th day of June 1999 ("Effective Date") between The Regents of the
University of California, a California corporation having statewide
administrative headquarters at 1111 Franklin Street, 12th Floor, Oakland,
California 94607 ("The Regents") and Triangle Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a North
Carolina corporation, having a principal place of business at 4 University
Place, 4611 University Drive, Durham, North Carolina 27707 ("Optionee").

                                   BACKGROUND

      The Regents and Optionee entered into an agreement effective September 1,
1996 (UC Control No. 97-11-0081) ("Option Agreement") granting to Optionee an
option to negotiate the terms of an exclusive license under Regents' Patent
Rights (as defined in the Option Agreement). Under Article 6 (Due Diligence) of
the Option Agreement, Optionee is required to sponsor research for at least two
(2) years according to the Project Description, Budget and Sponsored Research
Agreement set forth in Attachment C. In the event that both Studies (as defined
in the Sponsored Research Agreement) are terminated (other than for reasons of
uncured breach on the part of The Regents) pursuant to Paragraphs 2.2 or 2.9 of
the Sponsored Research Agreement, then Optionee shall have no further rights
under the Option Agreement.

      Optionee has requested that the Option Agreement be amended to delete this
provision *** , and The Regents hereby agrees to delete Paragraph 6.1 of Article
6 (Due Diligence) in its entirety.

*** Portions of this page have been omitted pursuant to a request for
Confidential Treatment and filed separately with the Commission.



                                       1
<PAGE>

The remaining provisions of the Option Agreement remain in full force and
effect. The parties have executed this Amendment by their respective and duly
authorized officers, as evidenced by the signatures below.

TRIANGLE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.          THE REGENTS OF THE
                                        UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA


By: /s/ Chris A. Rallis                By: /s/ Paula R. Szoka, Ph.D.
    -------------------                    -------------------------
         (Signature)                           (Signature)

Name: Chris A. Rallis                  Name: Paula R. Szoka, Ph.D.

Title: Vice President                  Title: Senior Licensing Officer
       Business Development
       and General Counsel

Date: June 8, 1999                     Date: June 9, 1999


                                       2
### **CHAPTER 4B—DISCLOSURE OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION**
### §2012. Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability Fund

The Director shall maintain the fund in the Treasury known as the "Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability Fund" (hereinafter in this chapter referred to as the "fund"), originally created pursuant to title II of the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement Act of 1964 for Certain Employees.

(Pub. L. 88–643, title II, §202, as added Pub. L. 102–496, title VIII, §802, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3201.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Central Intelligence Agency Retirement Act of 1964 for Certain Employees, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 88–643, Oct. 13, 1964, 78 Stat. 1043, which was formerly set out as a note under section 403 of this title. Pub. L. 88–643 was revised generally by Pub. L. 102–496, title VIII, §802, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3196, and is now known as the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement Act. As so revised, title II of Pub. L. 88–643 is classified generally to this subchapter.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 202 of Pub. L. 88–643, title II, Oct. 13, 1964, 78 Stat. 1043, related to establishment and maintenance of the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability Fund and was set out as a note under section 403 of this title prior to the general amendment of Pub. L. 88–643 by section 802 of Pub. L. 102–496.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on first day of fourth month beginning after Oct. 24, 1992, see section 805 of Pub. L. 102–496, set out as a note under section 2001 of this title.
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTIONS
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Radale Imports, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”), I,
      Ken Swanson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to
      my
      knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
              August 13,
              2007*/s/ Ken Swanson*Ken
              SwansonChief
              Financial Officer




The
      above
      certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
      or as a separate disclosure document.





Exhibit
      32.1
§ 556.1102 Under what circumstances will BOEM cancel my lease? ( a ) BOEM may cancel your non-producing lease if you fail to comply with any provision of OCSLA, the lease, or applicable regulations if the failure continues for 30 days after mailing of notice to your post office address of record by registered mail and you have not requested and been granted any additional time within which to correct the failure. Such cancellation is subject to judicial review under section 23 of OCSLA (43 U.S.C. 1349).
( b ) Your producing lease may be cancelled if you fail to comply with any provision of OCSLA, the lease, or applicable regulations. The Secretary will cancel a producing lease after the judicial proceedings required under section 5(d) of OCSLA (43 U.S.C. 1334(d)).
( c ) BOEM may cancel your lease if it determines that the lease was obtained by fraud or misrepresentation. You will have notice and an opportunity to be heard before BOEM cancels your lease.
( d ) BOEM may cancel your lease at any time if it determines, after a hearing, that continued activity will probably cause serious harm or damage to life (including fish and other aquatic life), property, any mineral, national security or defense, or the marine, coastal, or human environment; that the threat of harm or damage will not disappear or decrease to an acceptable level within a reasonable period of time; and the advantages of cancellation outweigh the advantages of continuing the lease.
( e ) BOEM may cancel your lease at any time after operations under the lease have been suspended or temporarily prohibited by the Department continuously for a period of five years pursuant to paragraph (d) of this section, absent your request for a shorter period.
( f ) If, upon demand, you fail to provide a bond, or alternative type of security instrument acceptable to BOEM, the Regional Director may assess penalties or cancel your lease in accordance with part 550, subpart N of this chapter;
( g ) Title 30, part 550, subpart A of the CFR provides the procedures for lease cancellation and compensation, if applicable.
| **Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows Supplemental Disclosures (Net cash paid or received) (Details) (USD $)In Thousands, unless otherwise specified** | 12 Months Ended |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
||
| **Supplemental Cash Flow Elements [Abstract]**                                                                                                          |            |   |   |
| Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized                                                                                                               | $ 71,749        | $ 69,083 | $ 73,492 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
The amount of cash paid for interest during the period net of cash paid for interest that is capitalized.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 230 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367179&loc=d3e4297-108586
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_InterestPaidNet**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**credit**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_SupplementalCashFlowElementsAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
§ 57.10008 Riding tramways. Persons other than maintenance persons shall not ride aerial tramways unless the following features are provided. ( a ) Two independent brakes, each capable of holding the maximum load;
( b ) Direct communication between terminals;
( c ) Power drives with emergency power available in case of primary power failure; and
( d ) Buckets equipped with positive locks to prevent accidental tripping or dumping.
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the                Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                August 7, 2006 | By:                */s/                David A. Dodge*                                             |
|-------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                | Name: David                A. Dodge                                                           |
|                                | Title: Chief                Financial Officer and principal                accounting officer |
|                                |                                                                                                    |
|                                |                                                                                               |
|                                |                                                                                               |

----
Ozone NAAQS Teleconference 

8/19/2010 

Andrea Drinkard/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Anna Wood/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, 

awood@hunton.com, clangworthy@hunton.com, dkaplan@enrd.usdoj.gov, Don 

Zinger/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Gautam Srinivasan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, 

hpizz@ago.state.ms.us, jclark@kirkland.com, Jenny Noonan/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, 

John Hannon/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Kevin 

McLean/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Location: ARN 5400 

EXTERNAL ATTENDEES 

Allison D. Wood – Hunton and Williams 

Lucinda Minton Langworthy – Hunton and Williams 

David Kaplan – US DOJ 

Harold Edward Pizzetta, III – Mississippi AG office 

Jeffrey Bossert Clark – Kirkland and Ellis LLP
### SUBCHAPTER II—INTERDICTION OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AND RELATED MATERIALS
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 7, 2011

s0131 

# Order

February 7, 2011

141860

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141860 COA: 288799 Oakland CC: 2008-221657-FH JUSTIN MARK GRIESEMER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 12, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
#### §§ 285.817-285.819 [Reserved]