alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST AMENDMENT AND ALLONGE TO THAT CERTAIN DEMAND
                     NOTE DATED April 26, 2001 EXEXUTED BY
              THE SINGING MACHINE COMPANY, INC. ("UNDERSIGNED") IN
              FAVOR OF LASALLE BUSINESS CREDIT, INC. ("LENDER") IN
            THE ORIGINAL PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $10,000,000.00 ("NOTE")

         This First Amendment and Allonge to the note is made and accepted by
the Undersigned as of this 13th day of August, 2002. All capitalized terms used
herein but not otherwise defined will have the same meanings herein as in the
Note.

         Lender and the Undersigned have agreed to amend the Note as herein
provided. Accordingly the Note is hereby amended as follows:

               1. The face amount of the Note is hereby amended to read Eleven
          Million and No/100 Dollars ($11,000,000.00) from Ten Million and
          No/100 Dollars ($10,000,000.00).

               2. The face amount of the Note is hereby amended to read
          Twenty-Five Million and No/100 Dollars ($25,000,000.00) from Eleven
          Million and No/100 Dollars ($11,000,000.00).

         Except as specifically amended hereby, the Note shall remain in full
force and effect as issued. An executed original of this First Amendment and
Allonge shall be attached to the original Note and will constitute an integral
part thereof.

                                               THE SINGING MACHINE COMPANY, INC.

                                               By: /s/ John F. Klecha
                                                  -------------------------
                                                  John F. Klecha

                                               Title:  President
                                                     ----------------------

Accepted and Agreed to this
26th day of August, 2002.

LASALLE BUSINESS CREDIT, INC.

By:  /s/ illegible
   ------------------------
Title:  Vice President
      ---------------------
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
13 - 21 - 00015 - CR
EX PARTE CECIL ADICKES On Appeal from the 147th District Court of Travis County , Texas Trial Cause No. D
- 1 - DC
- 16 - 200250

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with its opinion

. We further order th is decision certified below for observance. August 18, 2022
##### 



Page 11 of 26 Exhibit 99(c) KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2004-A OFFICERS CERTIFICATE Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, ELT
    
    JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. IT60 Wall Street, 26th Floor
    
    4 New York Plaza, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10005
    
    New York, NY 10004Attn: Structured Finance Services
    
    Attn: ITS  Global DebtMail Stop NYC60-2606
    
    Phone: (212) 623-5427Phone: (312) 407-0192
    
    Fax: (212) 623-5933Fax: (312) 407-1708KeyBank National Association
    
    Key Consumer Receivables LLC800 Superior Avenue, 4th Floor
    
    c/o KeyBank National AssociationCleveland, OH 44114
    
    800 Superior Avenue, 4th FloorAttn: President, KER
    
    Cleveland, Ohio 44114Phone: (216) 828-4293
    
    Attn: President, KERFax: (216) 828-9301
    
    Phone: (216) 828-4293Fax: (216) 828-9301
 Pursuant to Section 3.08 of the Subservicing Agreement between KeyBank National Association,
successor in interest to Key Bank USA, National Association as Master Servicer and Great Lakes
Educational Loan Services, Inc., as Subservicer, dated as of August 1, 2004 (the Agreement), the
undersigned hereby certifies that (i) a review of the activities of the Subservicer from the
inception of the Trust, through December 31, 2004, and of its performance under the Agreement has
been made, and (ii) to the best of the undersigneds knowledge, based on the review, the
Subservicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period. The undersigned also hereby certifies that the Subservicer has disclosed to the Master Servicer and
to the Trusts certified public accountants all significant deficiencies relating to the
Subservicers compliance with the minimum servicing standards in accordance with a review conducted
in compliance with the standard as set forth in the Agreement. Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc.,
SubservicerDate: February 15, 2005
    
    By: /S/ MICHAEL J. NOACKName: Michael J. NoackTitle: Chief Servicing Officer
#### Board of County Commissioners of Nobles County vs. Charles Z. Sutton.

February 2, 1877.

Tax Judgment — Appeal.—Notice of an appeal to the supreme court, from an • order of the district court refusing to set aside a tax j udgment, must be-served upon the county attorney.

In proceedings to enforce payment of taxes remaining delinquent, on June 1, 1875, for the county of Nobles, a tax judgment was entered in the district court for that county, against real estate of the defendant. A motion to vacate and set aside the judgment was denied by *Dickinson,*J., and the defendant attempted to appeal from the order denying his motion. The county attorney moved to dismiss the appeal for want of proper service of the notice.

*Daniel Rohrer,*for appellant.

*M. B.*Soule, for respondent.

*300Berry, J.

In the matter of the proceedings to enforce payment of taxes on real estate remaining delinquent on the 1st day of June, 1875, for the county of Nobles, state of Minnesota. By Laws 1874, c. 1, § 110, it is enacted 'that the filing of the list of delinquent taxes of real estate £ £ shall hare the force and effect of filing a complaint in an ■action by the county against each piece or parcel of land 'therein described, to enforce payment of the taxes therein appearing against it, and shall be deemed the institution of such action, and the same shall operate as notice of the pendency of such action.” See, also, sections 117, 120. By Gen. St. *c.*8, § 181, the county attorney is required to ■“ appear in all cases where the county is a party, and prosecute or defend for the county.” Gen. St. c. 66, § 62, •as amended by Laws 1872, c. 72, provides that, “where a party, whether resident or non-resident, has an attorney in the action, the service of papers shall be upon the attorney instead of the party.”

An appeal from the district to the supreme court is made by the service of a notice in muting on the adverse party and on the clerk. Gen. St. c. 86, § 3.

From these provisions of statute it follows that the filing of the delinquent list by the auditor, under section 110 of the tax law of 1874, has the effect to institute an action, in which the county is party plaintiff, and in which the county ■attorney is its attorneys upon whom service of notice of any ■apjieal in such action from the district to the supreme court must be made.

The case at bar is an attempted appeal from an order of the district court refusing to set aside a tax judgment. Upon the hearing below, the county attorney appeared for the county. Service of a notice of appeal was made upon the county auditor, but no notice of appeal was served upon the county attorney.

Appeal dismissed.
### §2232. Applicable law

In any judicial proceeding regarding this subchapter, Federal, State, or territorial laws of the United States, as applicable, shall govern and be applied without regard or reference to any law of any international or foreign jurisdiction.

(Pub. L. 114–187, title VI, §602, June 30, 2016, 130 Stat. 609.)
Editorial Note on Part 5
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 5 appear at 65 FR 16715, Mar. 29, 2000.

§ 5.324 Implementation of lease provisions. The lease for each tenant of a project for the elderly or persons with disabilities who is admitted on or after the date on which this subpart C is implemented shall contain the lease provisions described in § 5.321 and, if applicable, § 5.360. The lease for each tenant who occupies a unit in such a project under lease on the date of implementation of this part shall be amended to include the provisions described in § 5.321 and, if applicable, § 5.360: ( a ) For Housing programs: ( 1 ) Upon renewal of the lease and in accordance with any applicable regulation; and
( 2 ) When a Housing program tenant registers a common household pet under § 5.350
( b ) For Public Housing programs: ( 1 ) Upon annual reexamination of tenant income in accordance with any applicable regulation; and
( 2 ) When a Public Housing program tenant wishes to own or keep a common household pet in his or her unit.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.2

June 25, 2002

Scott Zimmerman
***** Hoover Farm Drive
Laytonsville, MD 20882

Dear Scott,

Congratulations on your promotion to Chief Financial Officer reporting to George
Kerns, CEO of Digex. This is a well deserved promotion and your continued strong
performance is critical to the on-going success of Digex. This letter outlines
the specifics of your compensation as CFO.

Base Salary
Your annual base salary increases to $200,000 effective July 1, 2002. This is a
10.5% increase from your current base salary.

Executive Compensation Plan
You will be eligible to participate in our management incentive compensation
plan. In this position, you will be eligible for a bonus of up to 60% of your
base salary. This bonus is evaluated and paid on an annual basis. This incentive
opportunity is contingent upon the achievement of corporate objectives as
determined by your departmental management. As you know this program has been
suspended for 2002 and there is no guarantee of the bonus level moving forward.

Severance
Upon termination for reason other than "cause", you will be entitled to receive
the equivalent amount of your base pay for a 12-month period. Medical and dental
benefits will continue until the earlier of one year or until substantially
similar coverage is obtained with another employer. Cause shall be defined as
your (i) willful and continued failure to substantially perform duties
reasonably assigned consistent with your position as Chief Financial Officer
(other than any failures resulting from physical or mental illness or death);
(ii) continuing failure to perform or discharge the duties of Chief Financial
Officer assigned to you by the Chief Executive Officer, if such failure to
perform or discharge your duties continues for a period of thirty (30) days
after written notice to you detailing such failure; or (iii) conviction of a
felony that adversely affects the business and/or reputation of Digex.

Congratulations and continued success as Chief Financial Officer.


Sincerely,

/s/ HOWARD WEIZMANN

Howie Weizmann
SVP, Human Resources

cc:   George Kerns

Encl.

/s/ T. SCOTT ZIMMERMAN                     6/25/2002
-----------------------------             -----------
Accepted: Scott Zimmerman                 Date
|     |
|-----|
|     |  |  |
| 3.8 | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Navistar International Corporation dated February 12, 2015.  Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K, which was dated February 11, 2015 and filed on February 18, 2015.  Commission File No. 0011-09618. |
| **Employee Benefit Plans (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions** | 12 Months Ended |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
||
| **Retirement Benefits [Abstract]**                           |            |   |   |
| Cash contributions                                           | $ 10.6          | $ 11.0 | $ 0.2 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_CompensationAndRetirementDisclosureAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Amount of discretionary contributions made by an employer to a defined contribution plan.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_DefinedContributionPlanEmployerDiscretionaryContributionAmount**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**duration |
OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

April 22, 2015

VIA EMAIL

Ted Moore II

TRM Manufacturing

375 TRM Circle

Corona, CA 92879

Dear Mr. Moore: 

This letter serves as a response to your February 12, 2015 request to re-evaluate the buffer zone 

reduction credits for the Weather-all Power film HB 125, a 5 layer TIF of various colors and 

1.25 mil thickness. 

The EPA has reviewed the updated laboratory tarp testing data for the Weather-all Power film

submitted by Ajwa Laboratory on behalf of TRM Manufacturing. Whereas the previous testing 

was conducted under high humidity conditions, the updated testing was conducted under 

standard humidity, which matches the conditions of the data used as the basis for the buffer zone 

credit categories. Based on the calculated mass transfer coefficients (MTCs) and the 

corresponding cut points determined by EPA as a basis for assigning buffer zone credits (DP 

Barcode 385314. Dawson, Smith and Shelat. “Second Update to Health Effects Division 

Recommendations for Good Agricultural Practices and Associated Buffer Credits.” January 11, 

2011), the tarp qualifies for the following buffer zone reduction credits: 60% for methyl 

bromide, 60% for chloropicrin, 60% chloropicrin and 1,3-dichloropropene, and 30% for metam 

sodium or metam potassium. This tarp continues to be approved with use of dimethyl disulfide.

The tarps will moved to the appropriate categories at http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/tarpcredits/

Please contact me at (703) 347-8652 or at gayoso.jose@epa.gov if you have any questions. 

Sincerely,

Jose Gayoso

Chemical Review Manager

Risk Management & Implementation Branch II

Pesticide Re-evaluation Division
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-23-00818-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF George CARSON, Deceased

From the Probate Court No. 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-PC-3843

Honorable Oscar J. Kazen, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. Given our 

disposition of this appeal, the pending motion to consolidate is DENIED AS MOOT.

We order the costs of this appeal to be paid by the parties who incurred them.

SIGNED December 13, 2023.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
#### § 56.7012 Tending drills in operation.

While in operation, drills shall be attended at all times.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6079

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DANIEL LEE SUGGS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. 

R. Bryan Harwell, Chief District Judge. (4:06-cr-00474-RBH-2; 4:16-cv-01545-RBH)

Submitted: April 16, 2020 Decided: April 21, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Lee Suggs, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Lee Suggs seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 (2018) motion and denying his motion for reconsideration. The order is not 

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2018). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2018). 

When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find the district court’s assessment of the 

constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate

both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 

140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Suggs has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Suggs’s motion for a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9489 

AN ACT 

To sunset the Advisory Committee on the Records of 

Congress, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 9489 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the 

3 ‘‘Advisory Committee on the Records of Congress Sunset 

4 Act of 2024’’. 

5 SEC. 2. MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION OF THE 

6 RECORDS OF CONGRESS. 

7 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

8 (1) the term ‘‘Archivist’’ means the Archivist of 

9 the United States; 

10 (2) the term ‘‘Clerk’’ means the Clerk of the 

11 House of Representatives; 

12 (3) the term ‘‘Director’’ means the Director of 

13 the Center for Legislative Archives of the National 

14 Archives, or any successor thereto; 

15 (4) the term ‘‘Member of Congress’’ means a 

16 Member of the Senate or the House of Representa17 tives, a Delegate to the House of Representatives, 

18 and the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico; 

19 and 

20 (5) the term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary 

21 of the Senate. 

22 (b) REPORTING.—Not later than February 1 of the 

23 second calendar year beginning after the date of enact24 ment of this Act, and every calendar year thereafter, the 

25 Director shall submit to the Archivist, the Secretary, and 
3 

•HR 9489 EH

1 the Clerk a report on the management and preservation 

2 of the records of Congress during the previous year. 

3 (c) REVIEW.—The Archivist, the Secretary, and the 

4 Clerk shall meet to review the management and preserva5 tion of the records of Congress and Members of Con6 gress— 

7 (1) not later than 60 days after the date on 

8 which the Director submits a report under sub9 section (b); and 

10 (2) not later than 180 days after the date on 

11 which an individual is appointed to the position of 

12 Archivist, Secretary, or Clerk. 

13 (d) SUNSET OF ADVISORY COMMITTEE.—Effective 

14 on the date that is 60 days after enactment, title 44 of 

15 the United States Code is amended— 

16 (1) by striking chapter 27; 

17 (2) by striking the table of sections relating to 

18 chapter 27; and 

19 (3) in the table of chapters, by striking the item 

20 relating to chapter 27. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 16, 

2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9489 

AN ACT 

To sunset the Advisory Committee on the Records 

of Congress, and for other purposes.
#### § 285.711 [Reserved]
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Calamos Asset Management, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ John P. Calamos, Sr.

John P. Calamos, Sr.Chairman, Chief Executive Officerand Co-Chief Investment Officer
Exhibit 32
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Radale Imports,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 (the
"Report"),  I, Lee D. Dodson,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  hereby
certify that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  February 21, 2006

                                             /s/ Lee D. Dodson
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Lee D. Dodson
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


         The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350) and is not being filed as
part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
### §17. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–119, title VI, §620, Nov. 26, 1997, 111 Stat. 2519

Section, act May 26, 1900, ch. 586, 31 Stat. 206, related to prohibition of establishment of telegraph or cable lines by foreigners.