alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United St ates District Judge for the District of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 11-1011

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * District of Nebraska. * Brandon Gerome Coffman, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: May 11, 2011 Filed: May 27, 2011

___________ Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. After the district court 1 granted the government’s Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) motion and reduced the 235-month prison sentence of Brandon Coffman to 114 months, he filed this appeal arguing that the court should have granted a greater reduction. Upon careful re view, we conclude that this appeal does not meet the criteria of 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a). See United States v. Haskins , 479 F.3d 955, 957 (8th Cir. 2007) (per curiam). Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw, and we dismiss the appeal.

______________________
### §1016. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–651, title III, §307A, Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 526

Section, act July 9, 1952, ch. 608, pt. II, §265, as added July 9, 1956, ch. 534, 70 Stat. 517; amended Sept. 2, 1958, Pub. L. 85–857, §13(r), 72 Stat. 1266; Sept. 21, 1959, Pub. L. 86–324, §1, 73 Stat. 596; June 28, 1962, Pub. L. 87–509, §1, 76 Stat. 120, provided for a lump-sum readjustment payment for involuntary release from active duty. See section 12686 of Title 10, Armed Forces.

Pub. L. 87–509, §1, June 28, 1962, 76 Stat. 120, was repealed by Pub. L. 89–718, §75(4), Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1124.
### §49. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Jan. 12, 1927, ch. 27, §1, 44 Stat. 968, which provided for admission to hospitals in the Territory of Alaska was omitted in view of the admission of Alaska into the Union.
### SUBCHAPTER II—WATER CARRIER TRANSPORTATION
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 951 

To prohibit educational institutions that require students to provide information with respect to their menstrual cycles from receiving Federal funds. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. SCHIFF (for himself, Mrs. CHERFILUS-MCCORMICK, and Ms. OMAR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To prohibit educational institutions that require students 

to provide information with respect to their menstrual 

cycles from receiving Federal funds. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Privacy in Education 

5 Regarding Individuals’ Own Data Act’’ or the ‘‘PERIOD 

6 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 951 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON RECEIPT OF FEDERAL FUNDS 

2 FOR CERTAIN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS. 

3 (a) PROHIBITION.—No Federal funds may be made 

4 available to any educational institution that requires any 

5 student at, or served by, such institution to provide infor6 mation with respect to the menstrual cycle of such stu7 dent. 

8 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

9 (1) EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION.—The term 

10 ‘‘educational institution’’ means a local educational 

11 agency, State educational agency, elementary school, 

12 secondary school, or institution of higher education. 

13 (2) ESEA TERMS.—The terms ‘‘elementary 

14 school’’, ‘‘local educational agency’’, ‘‘secondary 

15 school’’, and ‘‘State educational agency’’ have the 

16 meanings given the terms in section 8101 of the Ele17 mentary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 

18 U.S.C. 7801). 

19 (3) INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION.—The 

20 term ‘‘institution of higher education’’ has the 

21 meaning given the term in section 102 of Higher 

22 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1002). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
### §§172, 173. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 172 and 173, relating to Territory of Alaska, were omitted in view of admission of Alaska into the Union.

Section 172, act Mar. 3, 1909, ch. 266, 35 Stat. 837, authorized appointment of school employees as special peace officers.

Section 173, act Feb. 25, 1925, ch. 320, §1, 43 Stat. 978, authorized establishment of a system of vocational training for aboriginal natives.
#### § 57.19070 Closing cage doors or gates.

Cage doors or gates shall be closed while persons are being hoisted; they shall not be opened until the cage has come to a stop.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          95,680
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  356,795
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (7,894)
<INVENTORY>                                      8,541
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               499,073
<PP&E>                                       1,112,051
<DEPRECIATION>                               (750,330)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 940,944
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          397,645
<BONDS>                                         15,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        77,647
<OTHER-SE>                                     200,532
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   940,944
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,773,536
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,745,659
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,208
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,840
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,669
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,681
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,988
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,988
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .61


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,089,983
<SECURITIES>                                   331,163
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,492,341
<ALLOWANCES>                                    92,537
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,164,764
<PP&E>                                       3,574,465
<DEPRECIATION>                                 868,370
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,247,777
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,534,608
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       537,326
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,474,204
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,247,777
<SALES>                                     20,257,467
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,257,467
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            16,922,024
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                81,080
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             526,065
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,728,298
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,328)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,729,626
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,729,626
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
        

</TABLE>
NUMBER 13

- 10

- 00 367

- CR



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

JUAN HERNANDEZ

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 347 th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Juan Hernandez , by and through his attorney, has filed a “Withdrawal of

Notice of Appeal and Request to Dismiss Appeal” because he no longer desires to

prosecute it

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we

grant the motion to withdraw the appeal and pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 42.2(a), dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's2

request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed th e

26th day of August, 2010

.
### §6504. Incorporation of Department of Transportation research

(a) Review.—Not later than December 31, 2021, and not less frequently than once every 5 years thereafter, in concurrence with the applicable strategic plan under section 6503, the Secretary of Transportation shall—

(1) conduct a review of research conducted by the Department of Transportation; and

(2) to the maximum extent practicable and appropriate, identify modifications to laws, regulations, guidance, and other policy documents to incorporate any innovations resulting from the research described in paragraph (1) that have the potential to improve the safety or efficiency of the United States transportation system.

(b) Requirements.—In conducting a review under subsection (a), the Secretary of Transportation shall—

(1) identify any innovative practices, materials, or technologies that have demonstrable benefits to the transportation system;

(2) determine whether the practices, materials, or technologies described in paragraph (1) require any statutory or regulatory modifications for adoption; and

(3)(A) if modifications are determined to be required under paragraph (2), develop—

(i) a proposal for those modifications; and

(ii) a description of the manner in which any such regulatory modifications would be—

(I) incorporated into the Unified Regulatory Agenda; or

(II) adopted into existing regulations as soon as practicable; or

(B) if modifications are determined not to be required under paragraph (2), develop a description of the means by which the practices, materials, or technologies described in paragraph (1) will otherwise be incorporated into Department of Transportation or modal administration policy or guidance, including as part of the Technology Transfer Program of the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology.

(c) Report.—On completion of each review under subsection (a), the Secretary of Transportation shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report describing, with respect to the period covered by the report—

(1) each new practice, material, or technology identified under subsection (b)(1); and

(2) any statutory or regulatory modification for the adoption of such a practice, material, or technology that—

(A) is determined to be required under subsection (b)(2); or

(B) was otherwise made during that period.

(Added Pub. L. 117–58, div. B, title V, §25016(a), Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 872.)
Exhibit 23.1
 
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-124505 and 333-155163) and Form S-3 (Nos. 333-141098 and 333-157269) and related Prospectus’ of our report dated March 29, 2011 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of TearLab Corp., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of TearLab Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2010.
 
 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
 
 
 San Diego, California
 March 29, 2011
EXHIBIT 4.3.18A


                                   EXCERPT OF
                                MINUTES OF ACTION
                                     BY THE
                               BOARD OF DIRECTORS
                                       OF
                           GENERAL COMMUNICATION, INC.
                                DECEMBER 5, 2002


                           RESOLVED, that the board of directors of General
                           Communication, Inc. ("Company") approves in concept
                           an amendment to (i) change the limit on a
                           participant's contribution to his or her account in
                           the Company's Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan
                           from 10% to 50% of compensation for non-highly
                           compensated employees, and from 10% to 12% for highly
                           compensated employees as defined in the plan and (ii)
                           eliminate the phase-in schedule allowing a
                           participant to diversify his or her investments in
                           Company stock over a period of time through 2005 and
                           replace it with permission for the participant to
                           diversity such investments made before December 31,
                           2002 once the plan provides an appropriate accounting
                           of such stock;

                           RESOLVED FURTHER, that the board directs the
                           president or his designee to cause the appropriate
                           amendment to the plan to be drafted to implement the
                           provisions of this resolution and to execute and date
                           that amendment to become a part of the plan.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOn the Visual Input Driving Human Smooth-Pursuit Eye MovementsCurrent computational models of smooth-pursuit eye movements assume that the primary visual input is local retinal-image motion (often referred to as retinal slip). However, we show that humans can pursue object motion with considerable accuracy, even in the presence of conflicting local image motion. This finding indicates that the visual cortical area(s) controlling pursuit must be able to perform a spatio-temporal integration of local image motion into a signal related to object motion. We also provide evidence that the object-motion signal that drives pursuit is related to the signal that supports perception. We conclude that current models of pursuit should be modified to include a visual input that encodes perceived object motion and not merely retinal image motion. Finally, our findings suggest that the measurement of eye movements can be used to monitor visual perception, with particular value in applied settings as this non-intrusive approach would not require interrupting ongoing work or training.Document ID19970011371Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsStone, Leland S.*(National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)*Beutter, Brent R.*(National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)*Lorenceau, Jean*(National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1996Subject CategoryLife Sciences (General)Report/Patent NumberA-962859NAS 1.15:110424NASA-TM-110424Accession Number97N16286Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 199-16-12-37Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970011371.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
1-800-321-OSHA (6742)

TTY 1-877-889-5627

www.osha.gov

➊

➐

➋

➌ ➍

➎

➑

➏

➒

OSHA 4066-07 2020 — 9 Steps to Reducing Worker Exposure to COVID-19 in Meat, Poultry, and Pork Processing and Packaging Facilities (Thai)

คณะกรรมการบริหาร

งานความปลอดภัยและ

อาชีวอนามัย
----

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November 3, 2011 |   /s/ Ronald A. Duncan |
|------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                   | Ronald A. Duncan            |
|                   | Chief Executive Officer     |
|                   | General Communication, Inc. |

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Aaron Yarborough, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[833 NYS2d 421]—

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Ronald H. Tills, A.J.), rendered September 16, 2005. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed. Present— Martoche, J.E, Smith, Centra, Lunn and Peradotto, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
2000
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          15,452
<SECURITIES>                                    13,920
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,919
<ALLOWANCES>                                       733
<INVENTORY>                                        348
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,736
<PP&E>                                          16,324
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,293
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  54,968
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,028
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,840
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    54,968
<SALES>                                          5,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,713
<CGS>                                            1,641
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,898
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,542
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    87
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,892
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,187
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,187
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,187
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26



</TABLE>
### §32511. Relationship to other motor vehicle standards

(a) Preemption.—Except as provided in this section, a State or a political subdivision of a State may prescribe or enforce a bumper standard for a passenger motor vehicle or passenger motor vehicle equipment only if the standard is identical to a standard prescribed under section 32502 of this title.

(b) Enforcement.—This chapter and chapter 301 of this title do not affect the authority of a State to enforce a bumper standard about an aspect of performance of a passenger motor vehicle or passenger motor vehicle equipment not covered by a standard prescribed under section 32502 of this title if the State bumper standard—

(1) does not conflict with a standard prescribed under chapter 301 of this title; and

(2) was in effect or prescribed by the State on October 20, 1972.

(c) Additional and Higher Standards of Performance.—The United States Government, a State, or a political subdivision of a State may prescribe a bumper standard for a passenger motor vehicle or passenger motor vehicle equipment obtained for its own use that imposes additional or higher standards of performance than a standard prescribed under section 32502 of this title.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1047.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 32511(a) | 15:1920(a). | Oct. 20, 1972, Pub. L. 92–513, §110, 86 Stat. 955. |
| 32511(b) | 15:1920(b)(1). | |
| 32511(c) | 15:1920(b)(2). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "may prescribe or enforce . . . only if the standard is identical" are substituted for "no . . . shall have any authority to establish or enforce with respect to . . . which is not identical" to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "a standard prescribed under section 32502 of this title" are substituted for "Federal bumper standard" for clarity.

In subsection (b), before clause (1), the words "to continue" are omitted as surplus. The words "a bumper standard about an aspect of performance . . . not covered by a standard prescribed under section 32502 of this title" are substituted for "Until a Federal bumper standard takes effect with respect to an aspect of performance" and "any bumper standard which is applicable to the same aspect of performance of such vehicle or item of equipment" to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "if the State bumper standard" are added for clarity.

In subsection (c), the words "that imposes additional or higher standards of performance than" are substituted for "which is not identical to . . . if such requirement imposes an additional or higher standard of performance" for clarity and to eliminate unnecessary words.
### §174. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 18, 1890, ch. 797, §1, 26 Stat. 316, provided that nothing contained in former section 171 of this title should be construed to authorize an expenditure or involve the Government in any contract for future payment of money in excess of sums appropriated therefor.