P. 1 

# OAR Box 1110 Prepped byRyan Dugan



## Document

Number: 

# 8 ) IV-H- 3 Docket Number: 

# A-82-3 9

Printed 4/14/20081:23:55PM

Sheet 8of 156P. 2 

# ft^n-vi J 

### » **A \

UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO N AGENC Y/

V^ If ^J I HMR ^ | Offic e ofAi rQualityPlannin g an d Standard s \<4tilu£ /

Research Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a 2771 1 %. m<r *(. PRO* 0 

### 2 0 JU N 198 8



## MEMORANDU M SUBJECT : Reques t fo r OM B Clearanc e o f Reportin g andRecordkeepin g

Requirement s Associate dWit hNe wSourc e Performanc e Standard s (NSPS ) fo r Calciner s andDryer s i nMinera l Industrie s I : / Geral d A
. Em

i son , D i rect o r c 

### 4^^vA-^^^<^^-^ i>< 

### * /^Offic e o fAi rQualit yPlannin g an d Standard s (MD-10) 

## FROM : TO : Thoma s E . Kelly , Directo r

Offic e o f Standard s andRegulation s (PM-223 ) THRU : Debora hThompso n

Offic e o f Ai r andRadiatio n(ANR-443 ) Attache dar e th e Standar dFor mSF-8 3 andsupportin g statemen t (fou r copie s each ) fo r requestin g clearanc e o f th e reportin g and recordkeepin g requirement s associate dwit hth e NSP S fo r calciner s and dryer s i nminera l industries . Pleas e revie wthi s reques t andforwar di t t o th e Offic e o f Managemen t an dBudget . I f yo uhav e anyquestion s concernin g thi s submittal , pleas e contac t Dou g Bel l a t FT S 629-5568 . 2 Attachment s cc : Doug Bel l (MD-13 ) Kennet hDurke e (MD-13 ) Bo bKolbinsky(MD-13 ) Harve yNozic k(ANR-443 ) (w/ o attachment ) ^ Shirle yTable r (MD-13 ) ^^ ^

<•'•> ' <$>P. 3

SUPPORTIN GSTATEMEN T FORSTANDAR D FORM8 3
REPORTIN GAND RECORDKEEPIN GREOUIREMENT S FORTH E NE WSOURC E PERFORMANC E STANDARD S FOR CALCINER S AN D DRYER S I N MINERA L INDUSTRIE S
A . JUSTIFICATIO N 1 . Nee d fo r th e Informatio nCollection . Th e U . S . Environmenta l Protectio nAgenc y(EPA ) i s charge d unde r Sectio n11 1 o f th e Clea nAi r Act , a s amended , t o establis hstandard s o f performanc e fo r ne wstationar y source s tha t reflect :

. . . applicatio no f th e bes t technologica l syste mo f continuou s emissio nreductio nwhic h(takin g int o consideratio n th e cos t o f achievin g suc hemissio nreductio nand anynonai r qualit yhealt h and environmenta l impac t and energ yrequirements ) th e Administrato r determine s ha s bee nadequatel ydemonstrate d [Sectio n111(a)(1)] , Sectio n111(e ) furthe r states : Afte r th e effectiv e dat e o f standard s o f performanc e promulgate d unde r thi s Section , i t shal l b e unlawfu l fo r an yowne r o r operato r o f an yne wsourc e t o operat e suc hsourc e i nviolatio no f any standar d o f performanc e applicabl e t o suc hsource . I nth e Administrator' s judgment , particulat e matte r emission s fro mcalciner s and dryer s i nminera l industrie s cause , o r contribut e significantl yto , ai r pollutio ntha t ma yreasonabl yb e anticipate d t o endange r publi c healt ho r welfare . Consequently , ne wsourc e performanc e standard s (NSPS ) hav e bee ndevelope d fo r thi s sourc e categor yan d ar e currentl ybein g processe d fo r proposa l i n th e Federa l Register . Certai nrecord s and report s are necessar yt o enabl e th e Administrato r to : (1 ) identif ynew , modified , o r reconstructe d source s subjec t t o th e standard s and (2 ) ensur e tha t standard s base d o nbes t demonstrate d technolog y(BDT ) ar e bein g achieved .P. 4

2 . Descriptio nand Practica l Utilit yo f th e Informatio nCollectio n Activity .

a . Descriptio no f Informatio n Collectio nActivit yfo r Calciner s and Dryer s i nMinera l Industries . Report s o f star t o f construction , anticipate d and actua l startu p dates , an d physica l o r operationa l change s t o existin g facilitie s ar e require d t o identif yaffecte d sources . Report s o f initia l performanc e test s ar e necessar yt o determin e tha t BD T i s bein g used . Record s o f startups , shutdowns , o r malfunction s i nth e operatio no f affecte d facilitie s and associate d contro l equipment , record s o f opacit yand contro l devic e monitorin g parameters , and othe r informatio nrequire d b y th e standard s ar e necessar yt o determin e prope r operatio nand maintenance . Failur e t o collec t thi s informatio nwoul d allo wcircumventio n o f th e standards .

b . EP AUs e o f Dat a Collected . Th e informatio nwil l b e use d b y Agenc yenforcemen t personnel : (1 ) t o identif ynew , modified , and recon structe d source s subjec t t o th e standards ; (2 ) t o ensur e tha t BD T i s bein g properl yoperate d and maintaine d o na continuou s basis . Inaddition , record s and report s ar e necessar yt o enabl e EP At o identif y plant s tha t ma yno t b e i ncomplianc e wit hth e standard . Base d o nreporte d information , EP Aca ndecid e whic hplant s shoul d b e inspecte d and wha t record s o r processe s shoul d b e inspecte d a t th e plant . Th e record s tha t plant s woul d maintai nwoul d indicat e whethe r plant s ar e properl yoperatin g and maintainin g contro l equipment . 3 . Minimizin g Burden . Th e Agenc ydoe s no t as k th e respondent s t o reduc e th e data , onl yt o submi t th e recorde d log s semiannuall yfo r thos e period s o f norma l operatio ndurin g whic hth e 10-percen t opacit ylimi t fo r dr ycontro l 2P. 5

device s i s exceede d or , fo r we t scrubbers , th e pressur e dro p varie s b y mor e tha n1 0 percen t o r th e liqui d flo wrat e varie s bymor e tha n2 0 per cent . Thus , th e burde nwil l b e minimize d fo r thos e respondent s wh o properl y operat e and maintai nthei r syste mt o compl ywit hth e standards . Bal l cla y rotar ydryers , diatomit e rotar ydryers , feldspa r flui d be d dryers , fuller' s eart hrotar ydryers , gypsumrotar ydryers , gypsumflas hcalciners , gypsum kettl e calciners , industria l sand rotar ydryers , kaoli nrotar ydryers , kaoli nmultipl e heart hfurnaces , perlit e expansio n furnaces , tal c flas h dryers , tal c rotar ydryers , titaniu mdioxid e direc t o r indirec t rotar y dryers , and vermiculit e expansio nfurnace s controlle d b ydr ycontro l device s ar e exemp t fro mth e semiannua l reportin g and recordkeepin g requirement s associate d wit hopacit ymonitorin g becaus e neithe r continuou s opacit y monitorin g system s (COM's ) no r Metho d 9 procedure s wer e determine d t o b e reasonabl e afte r considerin g th e cost s and potentia l benefit s associate d wit hthes e requirements . 4 . Nonduplication . Acompute r searc ho f th e Federa l Informatio n Locato r Syste mindicate d tha t ther e ar e n o simila r informatio n request s bein g carrie d ou t b yth e Federa l Govenment . Asimila r searc ho f EPA' s ongoin g Informatio nCollection Request s (ICR's ) reveale d n o duplicatio n o f informatio ngatherin g efforts . However , certai nreport s require d b yStat e o r loca l agenc yca nb e provide d t o th e Adminstrato r i nlie u o f th e report s require d b

yth e recommende d standards . 5 . Consideratio no f Alternatives . Ther e ar e n o practica l alternative s fo r gatherin g thi s informatio nothe r tha nth e alternativ e note d i nparagrap h4 . 6 . Minimizin g o f Burde nfo r Smal l Business . Som e smal l organization s ma yb e affecte d b

yth e NSPS . However , th e informatio ncollectionrequirement s ar e th e minimu mnecessar yt o demonstrat e compliance . Th e EP Aha s criticall y 3P. 6

reviewe d th e reportin g and recordkeepin g requirement s associate d wit hth e recommende d standard s fo r calciner s and dryer s i nminera l industrie s and ha s reduce d reportin g and recordkeepin g requirement s t o dat a tha t ar e essentia l t o bot hth e responden t and EP At o ensure prope r operatio n and maintananc e o f contro l equipment . Bal l cla yrotar ydryers , diatomit e rotar ydryers , feldspa r flui d be d dryers , fuller' s eart hrotar ydryers , gypsumrotar ydryers , gypsum flas hcalciners , gypsumkettl e calciners , industria l sand rotar ydryers , kaoli nrotar ydryers , kaoli nmultipl e heart hfurnaces , perlit e expansio n furnaces , tal c flas hdryers , tal c rotar ydryers , titaniu mdioxid e direc t o r indirec t rotar ydryers , and vermiculit e expansio nfurnace s controlle d b ydr ycontro l device s hav e bee nexempte d fro mth e semiannua l reportin g requirement s becaus e i t wa s determine d t o b e unreasonabl e t o requir e th e owner s o r operator s o f thes e facilitie s t o monito r th e opacit yo f dr y contro l device s wit heithe r a CO Mo r a certifie d visibl e emission s observe r considerin g th e cost s and potentia l benefits . 7 . Consideratio no f Collection . Mos t o f th e informatio ncollectio n requirement s fo r calciner s and dryer s i nminera l industrie s ar e one-time
onl ynotification s o r report s and canno t b e performe d o n a les s frequen t basis . Thes e requirement s includ e th e notificatio no f constructio no r reconstruction , notificatio no f anticipate d startup , notificatio no f actua l startup , notificatio no f th e inita l performanc e test , and th e initia l performanc e tes t report . Semiannua l reportin g o f exceedance s o f th e opacit ylimi t fo r dr ycontro l devices , exceedance s o f operatin g paramete r limit s fo r we t scrubbers , and correctiv e maintenenc e require d a s a resul t o f annua l calibration s o f CO M o r operatin g paramete r monitorin g device s i s require d t o ensur e complianc e 4P. 7

wit hthe standard s o na continuou s basis . Th e frequenc yo f thes e report s wa s chose nb

yth e Agenc ya s th e leas t frequen t perio d tha t stil l provide s anadequat e margi no f assuranc e tha t facilitie s subjec t t o the standard s wil l no t operat e fo r extende d period s i n violatio no f th e standards . Les? ; frequen t informatio ncollectio ncoul d allo wlonge r period s o f tim e befor e poo r pollutio ncontro l operatin g and maintenanc e condition s and violatio n o f the standard s woul d b e identified . Thi s dela ywoul d resul t i nhighe r emission s and a decreas e i nai r quality . 8 . Paperwor k Reductio nAc t Guidelines . Non e o f the guideline s i n 5 CF R1320. 6 ar e bein g exceeded . 9 . Consultations . Representative s o f th e minera l processin g industrie s and member s o f th e Expande d Shale , Clay , an d Slat e Institute ; GypsumAssocia
tion ; Industria l Ga s Cleanin g Institute ; Nationa l Industria l San d Association ; Perlit e Institute ; The Refractorie s Institute ; Lightweigh t Aggregat e Industry ; and Stat e ai r pollutio ncontro l agencie s wer e consulte d durin g the developmen t o f the standards . No majo r problem s wer e encountere d o nwhic hagreemen t coul d no t b e reached . Furthermore , Sectio n111(b ) o f th e Clea nAi r Ac t require s tha t EP Arevie wNSP S 4 year s fro mthe dat e o f promulgation . Thi s revie wwil l includ e anassessmen t o f suc hfactor s a s th e nee d fo r integratio nwit hothe r programs , th e existenc e o f alternativ e methods , enforceability , improvement s i n emissio n contro l technology , and reportin g requirements . Fo r thi s reason , specia l consultatio nwit hrespondent s o na 3-yea r basi s shoul d no t b e necessary . 10 . Confidentiality . Anyinformatio nsubmitte d t o th e Agenc yfo r whic ha clai mo f confidentialit yi s mad e wil l b e safeguarde d accordin g t o th e Agency' s policie s se t fort hi nTitl e 40 , Chapte r 1 , Par t 2 , Subpar t B--Confidentialit yo f Busines s Informatio n(se e 4 0 CF R2 ; 4 1 FR36902 , Septembe r 1 , 1978 ; 4 4 FR17674 ,P. 8

Marc h23 , 1979) . Furthermore , th e typ e o f informatio ntha t i s bein g collecte d b yEP Ai s no t expecte d t o b e considere d confidentia l i nmos t cases . 11 . Sensitiv e Questions . Thi s sectio ni s no t applicabl e becaus e thi s ICRdoe s no t involv e matter s o f a sensitiv e nature . 12 . Cos t t o th e Governmen t and t o th e Respondents . a . Cos t t o th e Federa l Government . Th e Federa l Governmen t wil l no t incu r anydevelopmen t cost s becaus e th e informatio ncollectionrequirement s wer e develope d a s anincidenta l par t o f developin g th e standards . Furthermore , th e Federa l Governmen t wil l no t incu r anyoperatio ncost s becaus e reportin g and recordkeepin g requirement s o nth e par t o f th e respondent s ar e require d unde r Sectio n11 4 o f th e Clea nAi r Act . No Federa l cost s ca n b e directl yattribute d t o th e ICRbecaus e publicatio nand distributio n o f th e informatio n ar e par t o f th e Complianc e Dat a Syste ma s discusse d i nSectio n15 . Also , ther e wil l b e n o additiona l cost s associate d wit hexaminatio no f th e record s t o b e maintaine d b yth e respondent s becaus e th e examinatio ni s alreadya par t o f EPA' s periodi c inspectio no f sources , whic hi s par t o f EPA' s overal l complianc e and enforce
men t program . Th e onl ycost s tha t th e Federa l Governmen t wil l incu r ar e use r cost s associate d wit hth e analysi s o f th e reporte d information . Th e averag e annua l Federa l cos t durin g th e firs t 3 year s o f th e ICRi s estimate d t o b e $85,720.00 . Thi s cos t i s base d o na n averag e wag e o f $15.0 0 pe r hou r and a 11 0 percen t overhea d rate . Detail s upo nwhic hthi s estimat e i s base d ar e presente d i nTable s 1 and 2 fo r affecte d facilitie s controlle d b ydr ycontro l device s and we t scrubbers , respectively . Abreakdow no f cost s b ycos t categor yi s presente d belo wfo r th e tota l o f th e tw o type s o f devices : Direc t Personne l cost s - - $83,538.0 0 (includin g overhead ) Othe r Direc t Cost s —2,182.0 0 (travel ) Tota l —$85,720.0 0P. 9

b . Cos t t o th e Respondents . Respondent s ar e owner s o r operator s o f minera l calcine r and drye r facilitie s fo r whic hconstruction , modifica
tion , o r reconstructio nwil l commenc e afte r th e dat e o f proposa l o f th e standards . Th e cos t t o industr yfo r a representativ e responden t fo r th e firs t yea r i s presente d i nTabl e 3 . Arepresentativ e responden t wa s assume d t o b e a responden t tha t woul d b e require d t o fulfil l al l one-time
onl yreportin g and recordkeepin g requirement s and al l semiannua l and recurren t reportin g and recordkeepin g requirement s associate d wit hmaintainin g a CO M fo r a dr ycontro l devic e o r operatin g paramete r monitorin g device s fo r a we t scrubber . Th e tota l numbe r o f hour s fo r al l burde nitem s woul d b e 54 1 hour s fo r a dr ycontro l devic e and 44 3 hour s fo r a we t scrubber . Th e tota l numbe r o f hour s fo r semiannua l and recurren t burde nitem s woul d b e 10 2 hour s pe r yea r fo r bot ha dr ycontro l devic e and a we t scrubber . -Th e tota l cos t o f il l burde nitem s i nth e firs t yea r woul d b e $17,040.0 0 fo r a dr ycontro l device and $13,955.0 0 fo r a we t scrubber . Th e tota l annua l burde no f reportin g and recordkeepin g requirement s o f affecte d facilitie s controlle d b ydr ycontro l device s o r we t scrubber s i n th e firs t 3 year s afte r proposa l i s presente d i nTable s 4 and 5 , respectively . I t i s estimate d tha t ther e wil l b e approximatel y4 3 respondent s pe r yea r fo r th e firs t 3 year s afte r proposal . O f th e 4 3 respondents , i t i s expecte d tha t 3 4 wil l b e usin g dr ycontro l device s and 9 wil l b e usin g we t scrubbers . Respondent s ar e require d b yla wt o submi t one-time-onl yreports , whic h includ e al l o f th e "notification " report s liste d unde r Item3 E o f Table s 3 and 4 . I naddition , th e respondent s wh o ar e subjec t t o monitorin g requirement s woul d b e require d t o submi t semiannua l report s containin g informatio no nthos e period s o f norma l operatio ndurin g whic hth e 1 0 percen t opacit ylimi t fo r dr y contro l device s i s exceede d or , fo r we t scrubbers , th e pressur e dro p varie s b y 7P.1 0

mor e tha n2 0 percent . Thes e respondent s als o woul d b e require d t o submi t semiannua l report s tha t documen t correctiv e maintenanc e require d a s a resul t o f annua l calibration s o f monitorin g devices . Th e tota l averag e annua l cos t t o th e respondent s durin g th e firs t 3 year s o f th e ICRi s estimate d t o b e $680,482.00 . Thi s cos t i s base d o na tota l averag e annua l burde no f 21,60 3 person-hour s fo r 4 3 respondent s and anaverag e wag e o f $15.0 0 pe r hou r plu s a 11 0 percen t overhea d rate . However , recurren t cost s o f th e require d reportin g and recordkeepin g t o a representativ e responden t shoul d b e onl ya smal l fraction , o f th e first-yea r cost s becaus e 43 9 hour s o f th e estimate d 54 1 hour s fo r dr ycontro l device s and 34 1 hour s o f th e estimate d 44 3 hour s fo r we t scrubber s ar e associate d wit hth e initia l performanc e test s and notificatio nrequirements , whic har e require d onl y once . Inaddition , o f th e 4 3 affecte d facilitie s estimate d t o com e o nlin e annually , 2 3 facilitie s ar e expecte d t o b e exemp t fro manymonitorin g requirement s and wil l hav e t o compl ywit honl yth e initia l notification s and performanc e tests . Cost s o f recurren t burde nitem s t o a representativ e responden t shoul d b e abou t $3,200.0 0 pe r yea r fo r bot hdr ycontro l device s and we t scrubbers . 13 . Estimatio no f Responden t Burden . Informatio n collectio n requirement s includ e th e followin g one-time-onl yreports :

- - Notificatio no f construction , modification , o r reconstructio n n o late r tha n3 0 day s afte r commencemen t o f suc haction ;

- - Notificatio no f anticipate d dat e o f initia l startu p n o mor e tha n 6 0 day s no r les s tha n 3 0 day s prio r t o suc hdate ;

- - Notificatio no f th e dat e o f initia l startu p withi n1 5 day s afte r suc hdate ;

- - Notificatio no f th e dat e o f an initia l emissio ntes t withi n3 0 day s o f th e effectiv e dat e o f th e NSPS ; andP.1 1

- - Notificatio no f th e resul t o f th e initia l performanc e test . I t wa s assume d tha t 2 0 percen t o f th e initia l performanc e test s wil l fai l t o sho wcomplianc e wit hth e standards . Therefore , 2 0 percen t o f th e test s wil l b e repeated , and th e report s wil l b e submitte d again . Informatio ncollectionrequirement s als o includ e th e followin g semiannua l and recurren t reports :

- - Report s o f exceedance s o f th e opacit ylimi t fo r dr ycontro l device s o r exceedance s o f th e operatin g paramete r limit s fo r we t scrubbers .

—Report s o f correctiv e maintenanc e require d a s a resul t o f semiannua l calibratio no f th e CO Mfo r dr ycontro l device s o r o f operatin g paramete r monitorin g device s fo r we t scrubbers . I t wa s assume d tha t eac hresponden t woul d repor t on e exceedanc e pe r yea r regardles s o f th e typ e o f contro l devic e used . One-time-onl yinformatio nrequirement s wil l affec t 17 1 facilitie s controlle d b ydr ycontro l device s i nth e firs t 5 year s afte r proposa l o r abou t 3 4 facilitie s pe r yea r and wil l affec t 4 7 facilitie s controlle d b ywe t scrubber s i nth e firs t 5 year s afte r proposa l o r abou t 9 facilitie s pe r year . Semiannua l report s o f exceedance s o f th e opacit ylimi t fo r dr ycontro l device s wil l affec t abou t 7 facilitie s i nth e firs t 3 year s afte r proposal . Sevent yfacilitie s wil l no t b e require d t o submi t report s o f exceedanc e o f th e opacit ylimi t becaus e opacit y monitorin g requirement s wer e determine d no t t o b e cos t effective . Semiannua l report s o f exceedance s o f operatin g paramete r limit s fo r we t scrubber s wil l affec t abou t 6 facilitie s i nth e firs t 3 year s afte r proposal . Semiannua l report s o f correctiv e maintenanc e require d a s a resul t o f semiannua l calibration s o f a CO Mfo r dr ycontro l device s or.operatin g paramete r monitorin g device s (OPMD ) fo r we t scrubber s wil l affec t 3 2 an d 2 8 facilities , respectively , i nth e firs t 3 year s afte r proposal . 14 . Reaso nfo r Chang e i nBurden . Thi s sectio ni s no t applicable .P.1 2

15 . Scheduling . Informatio ncontaine d i nth e one-time-onl yreport s wil l b e entere d int o th e Complianc e Dat a Syste m operate d and maintaine d b yEPA' s Stationar ySourc e Complianc e Division . Dat a obtaine d durin g periodi c visit s b

yAgenc ypersonne l fro mrecord s maintaine d b yth e respondents wil l b e tabulate d and publishe d fo r interna l Agenc yus e i ncomplianc e and en forcemen t programs . Atim e schedul e fo r th e collectio no f informatio nand publicatio no f dat a i s no t applicabl e becaus e report s and recordkeepin g ar e triggere d b

yactio no f th e respondents . 16 . Standar d Industria l Classification s (SIC) . Th e SI C code s fo r th e respondent s affecte d b ythes e propose d standard s ar e 1051 , 1446 , 1452 , 1453 , 1454 , 1455 , 1459 , 1492 , 1496 , 1499 , 2816 , and 3295 . B . COLLECTIO NO F INFORMATIO NEMPLOYIN GSTATISTICA L METHOD S Thi s sectio ni s no t applicabl e becaus e statistica l method s ar e no t use d i nth e dat a collectio nassociate d wit hthi s regulation .



### 1 0P.1 3

TABL E 1 . ANNUAL ESTIMAT E O F DIREC T PERSONNE L COST S T OTH E FEDERAL

GOVERNMEN T FO

RFACILITIE S CONTROLLE DB YDRYCONTRO L DEVICE S

BURDE N ITE M Hour s

pe r occur renc e (A ) Occur rence s pe r facilit y pe r yea r (B ) Hour s pe r

facilit y pe r yea r (C=AxB ) Facilitie s Hour s

pe r year 3 pe r yea r (D ) (E=CxD ) Dollar s

pe r yea r 1 . Initia l Performanc e Tes t 12 0 12

0 2.7 ° 32

4 2 . Repea t Performanc e Tes t

- Retestin gPreparatio n1 6

- Retestin g12 0 3 . Litigatio n 4 . Exces s Emission s 2,08 0 Enforcemen t Activitie s 12 0 5 . Repor t Review

- Notificatio no f 2 construction/reconstructio n

- Notificatio no f 2 anticipate dstartu p

- Notificatio no f 2 actua l startu p

- Notificatio no f initia l 2 performanc e tes t

- Revie w emissio n8 tes t repor t

- Notificatio no f 2 demonstratio no f CO

M

- Revie w CO M o r Metho d9 1 6 demonstratio n

- Review exces s emission s 8 report s

- Review no exces s 2 emission s report s TOTAL ANNUAL HOUR S 6 . Trave l Expense s fo r Test s Attended 1 * ( 1 perso nx3. 1 facilities/y r x1 day/tes t x$5 0 pe r diem ) + ($400/roundtri px3. 1 roundtrips/yr ) 7 . Salary 1 ( 1 perso n x1855. 6 hours/y rx$31.50/h ) TOTAL ANNUAL COST S (trave l expens e + salary ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 6

12 0 2,08 0 12 0 2 2 2 2 8 2 1 6 1 6 4 3.4 C 0.3 d 0.3 e 0.1 ' 34.2 a 34. 2 34. 2 34. 2

. 34. 2 7.8 9 10.8 n 2.2 1 8.6 J 54. 4

3 6 624 1 2 68. 4 68. 4 68. 4 68. 4 273. 6 15. 6 172. 8 35. 2 34. 4 1,855. 6 1,395.0 0

58,451.4 0 59,846.4 0

a Assume 34. 2 affecte dfacilities/yr . us e dry contro l devices . ° Assume enforcemen t personne l attend8 percen t o f initia l test s an d34. 2 affecte dfacilitie s tested . c Assume 2 0 percen t repea t performanc e tes t du e t o failur e an d5 0 percen t o f failure s canno t retes t immediately . dAssume enforcemen t personne l attend1 0 percen t o f retests . e Assume on e facilit y in10 0 wil l b e involve dinlitigation . Assume 10. 8 facilitie s ar e require dt o monito r opacit y an d1 0 percen t wil l hav e t o retes t a s a resul t o f exces s emission s reports . 9 Onl y 7. 8 o f th e 34. 2 affecte dfacilitie s wil l be require dt o demonstrat e a continuou s opacit y

monitorin gsystem

(COM) . nAssume 7. 8 o f th e 34. 2 affecte dfacilitie s wil l b e require dt o instal l a COM

. an dthre e facilitie s wil l hav e t o perform dail y visibl e emission s observation s 1 Assum e 2 0 percen t o f 10. 8 affecte dfacilitie s wit hmonitorin grequirement s hav e
. exces s emission s t o repor t semiannually . JAssume 8 0 percen t o f 10. 8 affecte dfacilitie s wit hmonitorin grequirement s hav e no exces s emission s t o repor t semiannually . kTest s attende d= 2. 7 initia l test s + 0. 3 repea t test s + 0. 1 enforcemen t test s = 3.1 . 1 Direc t personne l = $15.00/ hplu s 11 0 percen t overhea d= $31.50/h .P. M 

### TABL E 2 . ANNUAL ESTIMAT E O F DIREC T PERSONNE L COST S T O TH E FEnERA L

GOVERNMEN T FORFACILITIE S CONTROLLE D BY WE T SCRUBBER S

BURDE NITE M Hour s pe r occur renc e (A ) Occur rence s pe r facilit y pe r yea r (B ) Hour s pe r

facilit yFacilitie s pe r yea r (C=AxB ) pe r year c



### (0 ) Hour s pe r yea r Hollar s (E=CxD ) pe r yea r 1 . Initia l Performanc e Tes t 2 . Repea t Performanc e Tes t 12 0 12 0 0.8 h 

### 9 6

3 . 4 . 5 . - Retesting Preparatio n

- Retesting Litigatio n Exces s Emission s

- Enforcemen t Activitie s Repor t Review

- Notificatio n o f 1 6 12 0 2,08 0 12 0 2 cons t ruction/reconstruc t io n

- Notificatio n o f anticipate d startu

p

- Notificatio n o f actua l startu

p

- Notificatio n o f initia l performanc e tes t

- Reviewemissio n tes t repor t

- Notificatio n o f demonstratio n o f OPMD

- ReviewOPM

D demonstratio n

- Reviewexces s emission s report s

- Reviewno exces s emission s report s 2 2 2 8 2 1 6 8 2 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 6

12 0 2,08 0 12 0 2 2 2 2 8 2 16 1 6 4 

### TOTA L ANNUA L HOUR S 6 . Trave l Expense s fo r Test s Attended 1 

### ' ( 1 perso nx1.7 5 facilities/y r x1 day/tes t x$5 0 pe r diem ) + ($400/roun dtri p x1.7 5 roundtrips/yr ) 7 . SalaryJ ( 1 perso n x796. 4 hours/y rx$31.50/h ) 

### TOTA L ANNUA L COST S (trave l expens e + salary ) 0.9 C 0.09 ^ 0.09 e 0.9 f 9.4 a 9. 4 9. 4 9. 4 9. 4 9. 4 9. 4 1.9 9 7.5 h 14. 4

10. 8 187. 2 10 8 18. 8 18. 8 18. 8 18. 8 75. 2 18. 8 150. 4 30. 4 30. 0 

### 796. 4 787.5 0
25,086.6 0 25,874.1 0
a Assum e 9. 4 affecte dfacilities/yr . us e we t scrubbers . b

### Assum e enforcemen t personne l atten d8 percen t o f initia l test s and9. 4 affecte dfacilitie s tested . c 

### Assum e 2 0 percen t repea t performanc e tes t du e t o failur e and5 0 percen t o f failure s canno t retes t immediately . d

### Assum e enforcemen t personne l atten d1 0 percen t o f retests . e Assum e on e facilit yi n 10 0 wil l b e involve di n litigation , f Assum e 1 0 percen t wil l hav e t o retes t a s a resul t o f exces s emission s reports . 9 Assum e 2 0 percen t o f th e 9. 4 affecte dfacilitie s hav e exces s emission s t o repor t semiannually . n

### Assum e 8 0 percen t o f 9. 4 affecte dfacilitie s hav e n o exces s emission s t o repor t semiannually . „ n 

### . . . 1 

### Test s attende d= 0. 8 initia l test s + 0.0 9 repea t test s + 0. 9 enforcemen t test s = 1.75 . j Direct'personne l = $15.00/ hplu s 11 0 percen t overhea d= $31.50/h .P.1 5

TABL E 3 . COS T T O INDUSTRYFOR AREPRESENTATIV E RESPONDEN T FOR TH E FIRS T YEA R Person-hour s Person-hour s pe r pe r Numbe r o f Responden t BURDE NITE Moccurrenc e occurence s pe r yea r 1 . Reportin g Requirement s A
. Rea d Instruction s 1 1 1 B
. Require d Activitie s

- Initia l performanc e tes t33 0 1 330

- Demonstratio n o fcontinuou s 100,2 a » D l,i a 100,2 a monitorin g syste m (CMS ) o r operatin g paramete r monitorin g device s (OPMD )

- Recalibratio n o f CM S o r 4 2 8 OPM D (semiannual ) C . Writ e Repor t

- Notificatio n o f constructio n 2 1 2 and reconstructio n

- Notificatio n o f anticipate d 2 1 2 startu p

- Notificatio n o f actua l startup 2 1 2

- Notificatio n o f initia l per - 2 1 2 ' formanc e tes t

- Report s o f exces s emission s 1 6 1 16
- (Recurrent ) 2 . Recordkeepin g Requirement s A . Tim e t o Ente r Informatio n

- Record s o f startup , shutdown , 1. 5 4 6 ' malfunction , etc . (recurrent )

- Record s o f al l measurement s and 1. 5 4 8 72
- informatio n require d b yth e standar d (recurrent ) TOTA L ANNUA L HOUR S 541,443 a TOTA L ANNUA L COSTS C $17,041.50 a (Tota l annua l hour s x$31.50/h ) $13,954.50 a Approximatel y5 4 percen t o f affecte d facilitie s wil l hav e n o monitorin g requirements . Th e number s i n th e tabl e ar e fo r thos e facilitie s tha t wil l hav e monitorin g requirements , Th e firs t numbe r correspond s t o a typica l facilit ycontrolle d b ya dr ycontro l devic e and th e secon d numbe r correspond s t o a typica l facilit ycontrolle d b ya we t scrubber . Assum e i t wil l tak e 1 hou r eac ht o demonstrat e pressur e los s and liqui d flo wrat e monitorin g devices . Personne l cost s = $15.00/ h+ 11 0 percen t overhea d = $31.50/h .TABL E 4 . ANNUA L RESPONDEN

T BURDE NO

F REPORTIN

GAN D RECORDKEEPIN

GREQUIREMENT S O

F THE PROMULGATE D STANDARD (DR Y CONTRO L DEVICES )

BURDENITEM Occurrence s pe r Hour s pe r Respondent s Hour s pe r responden t responden t pe r Hour s pe r occurrenc e pe r yea r pe r yea r year 3 yea r (A ) (B ) ( C = AxB ) (D ) ( E = CxD ) Dollar s pe r year ^ (F ) 1 . Application s 2 . Survey s AStudie s 3 . Reporting Requirement s A . Rea d Instruction s B . Require d Activitie s

- Initia l performanc e tes t

- Repea t performanc e tes t N/A C N/ A



### C . D . E . - Demonstratio n o f CO M

- Metho d 9 tes t

- Repea t o f Method 9 tes t

- Recalibratio n o f CO M (semiannual ) Creat e Information Gathe r Existing Information Writ e Repor t 33 0 33 0 10 0 1 8 1 8 4 Included in 3 B Included in 3 E Notificatio n o f construction / reconstructio n Notificatio n o f physical / operationa l changes . Notificatio n o f anticipate d startup . Notificatio n o f actua l startu p Notificatio n o f initia l per formanc e test . Notificatio n o f demonstratio n o f COM . Report s o f exces s emission s (recurrent) . Repor t o f performanc e tes t Repor t o f CO

Mdemonstratio n 

### N/ A
2 2


### 16 Included Included i n

in 3 B 3 B 33 0 33 0 10 0 1 8 1 8 8 34. 2

34. 2 34. 2

68. 4 1,077.3 0

34. 2 6.8 ^ 7.8 e 26.4 f 5.3 9 7.8 e 11,286. 0

2,244. 0 780. 0 475. 2 95. 4 62. 4 355,509.0 0

70,686.0 0 24,570.0 0 14,968.0 0 3,005.1 0 1,965.6 0

2,154.6 0


### 2 2 2 

### 2 3 2 34. 2

34. 2 34. 2 7.8 e 10.8 h 68. 4

68. 4 68. 4 15. 6 345. 6 2,154.6 0

2,154.6 0 2,154.6 0 491.4 0 10,886.4 0TABL E 4 (CONTINUED )

BURDE NITEM Hour s pe r occurrenc e (A ) Occurrence s pe r

responden t pe r yea r (B ) Hour s pe r

responden t pe r yea r (C=AxB ) Respondent s Hour s

pe r year 3 pe r yea r (D ) (E=CxD ) Dollar s pe r yea r 4 . Recordkeeping Requirement s A . Rea d Instruction s 

### B . C . D . E . Pla n Activitie s Implemen t Activitie s Develop Recor

d Syste m Time t o Ente r Information Record s o f startup , shutdown , malfunction , etc . (recurrent) .

- Record s o f al l measure ments , an

d information required b

ythe standard s (recurrent) .

- Record s o f exces s emission s (recurrent) . F . Trai n Personne l G . Audit s TOTA L ANNUA L HOUR S TOTA L ANNUA L COST S Included in Included i

n Included in


### 1. 5 1. 5 3 A 3 B 3 B



### 4

1 

### " 48 J

Included i

n 3 E 

### 3 2 

### N/ A

N/ A 6

7 2



### 3 2 34. 2

10.8 n

3.0 k 205. 2

777. 6

96. 0
16,690.8 0 6,463.8 0

24,494.4 0

3,024.0 0

525,760.2 0a Assum e on e affecte d facilit ype r responden t and 34. 2 affecte d facilitie s pe r yea r tha t us e dr ycontro l devices ,

bHourl ywag e o f $15.0 0 plu s 11 0 percen t overhea d cost s equal s $31.50 . Thi s amoun t wa s multiplie d b yth e hour s pe r yea r i nColumnE . c N/ A= no t applicabl e d Assum e 2 0 percen t o f initia l performanc e test s mus t b e repeate d becaus e th e initia l tes t failed . e Onl y7. 8 o f th e 34. 2 affecte d facilitie s wil l b e require d t o demonstrat e a continuou s opacit ymonitorin g syste m (COM) . F Assum e 26. 4 o f th e 34. 2 affecte d facilitie s wil l no t us e COM' s and wil l hav e t o perfor ma Metho d 9 test . 9 Assum e 2 0 percen t o f Metho d 9 test s mus t b e repeate d becaus e o f failure . nAssum e 7. 8 o f th e 34. 2 affecte d facilitie s wil l b e require d t o instal l a CO Man d thre e facilitie s wil l hav e t o perfor mdail yvisibl e emission s observations . } Assum e responden t wil l shutdow ntwic e pe r yea r fo r maintenanc e and twic e pe r yea r fo r proces s malfunctions . J Assum e 4 8 week s pe r yea r o f operation , k Assum e thre e facilitie s hav e t o hav e personne l certifie d fo r Metho d 9 testing .

0 0

### TABL E 5 . ANNUA L RESPONDEN T BURDE NO F REPORTIN GAND RECORDKEEPIN GREQUIREMENT S O F TH E PROMULGATE D STANDAR D (WE T SCRUBBERS )

BURDE NITE M Hour s pe r occurrenc e (A ) Occurrence s pe r

responden t pe r yea r (B ) Hour s pe r

responden t pe r yea r ( C = AxB ) Respondent s

pe r year 3 (D ) Hour s pe r

yea r ( E = CxD ) Dollar s

pe ryea r (F ) h


### 1 . Application s 2 . Survey s & Studie s 3 . Reportin g Requirement s A . Rea dInstruction s B . Require dActivitie s

- Initia l performanc e tes t

- Repea t performanc e tes t

- Demonstratio no f we t scrubbe r operatin g paramete r monitorin g device s (OPMD) .

- Repea t o f demonstratio no f we t scrubbe r OPMD .

- Recalibratio no f we t scrubbe r OPM D (semiannual) . C . Creat e Informatio n Include d i n 3 B D
. E
. Gathe rExistin g Informatio n Writ e Repor t

- Notificatio n o fconstruction / reconstruction
.

- Notificatio n o fanticipate d startup .

- Notificatio n o factua l startu p

- Notificatio n o finitia l per formanc e test .

- Report s o fexces s emission s (recurrent)
.

- Repor to fperformanc e tes t

- Repor to fwe tscrubbe rOPM D demonstratio n Include d 2 2 2 2 1 6 Include d Include d i n

i n i n 3 E

3 B 3 B 1 1 1 1 2 N/Ab N/ A

32 

### 9. 4 9. 4

9. 4 300. 8 

### 296.1 0OOOOOO00rooofD 

### 2 4 1

1 1 1 2 33 0

33 0 2 2 8 9. 4

1.9C 9. 4 1.9 d 9. 4 3,102. 0

627. 0 18. 8 3. 8 75. 2 97,713.0 0

19,750.5 0 592.2 0 119.7 0 2,368.8 0

2 2roro 

### 9. 4

9. 4 9. 4 9. 4 18. 8

18. 8 18. 8 18. 8 592.2 0

592.2 0 592.2 0 592.2 0 9,475.2 0TABL E 5 (CONTINUED )

BURDE NITEM Hour s pe r occurrenc e (A ) Occurrence s pe r

responden t pe r yea r (B ) Hour s pe r

responden t pe r yea r (C=AxB ) Respondent s

pe r year 3 (D ) Hour s

pe r yea r (E=CxD ) Dollar s

pe r year b 4 . Recordkeeping Requirement s A . Rea d Instruction s B . Pla n Activitie s C . Implemen t Activitie s D . Develo

p Record Syste

m E . Time t o Ente r Information

- Record s o f startup , shutdown , malfunction , etc . (recurrent) .

- Record s o f al l measure ments , an

d informatio n required b

yth e standard s (recurrent) .

- Record s o f exces s emission s (recurrent) . F . Trai n Personne l Included i n 3 A Included i n 3 B Included i n 3 B



### 1. 5 1. 5 4 f

48 9 

### N/ A 6

7 2 9. 4

9. 4 56. 4

676. 8 1,776.6 0

21,319.2 0

Included in 3 E

G . Audit s TOTA L ANNUA L HOUR S TOTA L ANNUA L COST S N/A N/ A 4,945. 4 155,780.1 0 3 Assume 9. 4 affected facilitie s pe r yea r us e we t scrubbers , bN/ A= no t applicabl e c Assume 2 0 percen t repea t performanc e tes t du e t o failure , d Assume 2 0 percen t fai l the initia l demonstratio n o f we t scrubbe r OPMD . e Assume i t wil l tak e 1 hour eacht o demonstrat e pressur e los s an d liqui d flowrat e monitoring devices , f Assume responden t wil l shutdow n twic e pe r yea r fo r maintenanc e an d twic e pe r yea r fo r proces s malfunctions . 9 Assume 4 8 week s pe r yea r o f operation . nHourl ywag e o f $15.0 0 plu s 11 0 percen t overhead cost s equal s $31.50 . Thi s amoun t wa s multiplie d b yth e hour s pe r yea r i

n Colum n E . T l h oP.2 1

ATTACHMENT

SOURC E DATAAND INFORMATIO NREQUIREMENT S

Genera l Regulatio n Provisio n Requ i remen t Referenc e Referenc e ° Notificatio n o f construction , 60.7(a ) reconstruction , modification , anticipate d startup , actua l startup , and demonstratio n o f continuou s monitorin g syste m
° Record s o f startup , shutdown , 60.7(b ) o r malfunctio n o 2 yea r retentio n o f record s 60.735(a ) 60.7(d )
° Repor t o f performanc e tes t 60.8(a ) dat a and result s ° Notificatio n o f performanc e 60.8(d ) tes t ° Record s o f opacit ymonitorin g 60.735(a ) result s fo r dr ycontro l device s an d and operatin g paramete r monitorin g 60.735(b ) devic e (OPMD ) result s fo r we t scrubber s o Semiannua l report s o f monitorin g result s 60.735(c )