alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **CHAPTER 329—AUTOMOBILE FUEL ECONOMY**

Sec.
32901.
Definitions.
32902.
Average fuel economy standards.
32903.
Credits for exceeding average fuel economy standards.
32904.
Calculation of average fuel economy.
32905.
Manufacturing incentives for alternative fuel automobiles.
32906.
Maximum fuel economy increase for alternative fuel automobiles.
32907.
Reports and tests of manufacturers.
32908.
Fuel economy information.
32909.
Judicial review of regulations.
32910.
Administrative.
32911.
Compliance.
32912.
Civil penalties.
32913.
Compromising and remitting civil penalties.
32914.
Collecting civil penalties.
32915.
Appealing civil penalties.
32916.
Reports to Congress.
32917.
Standards for executive agency automobiles.
32918.
Retrofit devices.
32919.
Preemption.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–429, §6(43)(C), Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4383, added items 32918 and 32919 and struck out former item 32918 "Preemption".
#### § 56.6801 Vehicle repair.

Vehicles containing explosive material and oxidizers shall not be taken into a repair garage or shop.
OPINION OF COUNSEL

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

I am counsel to Berwyn Income Fund, Inc.  I am
writing this letter to state my opinion as counsel
that the shares of the Fund sold in calendar year
1995 were legally issued, fully paid and non-
assessable.

Berwyn Income Fund, Inc., is a corporation
incorporated under the laws of the Common-wealth of
Pennsylvania on December 26, 1986.  Under its
Articles of Incorporation, the Fund has the power to
issue 20,000,000 shares of common stock.  On
February 7,1987, a shareholder resolution was
approved that authorized the Board of Directors to
issue shares of common stock in such amounts and
proportions as from time to time it deemed
appropriate and the Board was authorized to set the
price at which shares would be sold.

On June 10, 1987, the Board approved a resolution
authorizing the sale of 2,000,000 shares of common
stock to the public.  The resolution directed that
prior to sale, the shares be registered with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and various
states and that the shares be sold at their net
asset value and that they be fully paid and non-
assessable when issued.  The share registration with
the Securities and Exchange Commission became
effective September 3, 1987.

On December 11, 1992, the Board authorized the Fund
to register an indefinite number of shares of common
stock for sale with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to rule 24f of the Investment
Company Act of 1940.

Registration under Rule 24f became effective on
March 24, 1993.  Under section 1524 of the
Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law of 1988,
shares of stock sold by Pennsylvania corporations
after December 1988, will be deemed fully paid and
non-assessable unless there are contrary provisions
in Articles of Incorporation or By Laws.  There are
no provisions in the Fund's Articles or By Laws that
allow the Fund to issue stock that is not fully paid
or to issue assessable stock.

Based upon the foregoing facts, it is my opinion
that the shares issued in 1995 were legally issued,
fully paid and non-assessable.



                                   Kevin M. Ryan
                                   Kevin M. Ryan
                                   Counsel to the
Fund
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent,

v. KHAIRA. SIDDIQ, Appellant. No. 70234-3-1 UNPUBLISHED OPINION
FILED: MAY 1 2 20H ro

Per Curiam

—Khair Siddiq appeals his conviction for second degree assault, arguing that the court erred in refusing a "to-convict" instruction that required the State to prove the absence ofself-defense. But Siddiq concedes thatthe court gave a 

### separate instruction regarding the State's burden ofproofon self-defense and that our 

### Supreme Court approved that procedure in State v. Hoffman, 116Wn.2d 51, 109, 804 P.2d 577 (1991) (to-convict instruction need not contain the absence ofself-defense so 

### long as aseparate instruction informs thejury ofthe State's burden ofproof). Although Siddiq argues that Hoffman is inconsistentwith subsequent cases and should notbe followed, none ofthe cited cases question Hoffman's holding, which is binding on this court. State v. Gore, 101 Wn.2d 481, 487, 681 P.2d 227 (1984). Affirmed. FOR THE COURT:
#### Universal Vending Service Company, appellee, v. Mrs. Minnie Petty, appellant.

Gen. No. 28,587.

Consolidated with No. 28,578 ante. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Henry M. Walker, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed November 27, 1923.

Per Curiam.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         161,043
<SECURITIES>                                     4,002
<RECEIVABLES>                                  470,052
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    708,614
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,531,729
<PP&E>                                       5,252,120
<DEPRECIATION>                                  66,860
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,688,420
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,601,336
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,496
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,356,055
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,688,424
<SALES>                                      3,281,909
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,281,909
<CGS>                                        2,945,584
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,945,584
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,025,353
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             117,919
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,600,705)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,600,705)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.668)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.668)



</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1902 What must I include in my SEMS program? You must have a properly documented SEMS program in place and make it available to BSEE upon request as required by § 250.1924(b). ( a ) Your SEMS program must meet the minimum criteria outlined in this subpart, including the following SEMS program elements: ( 1 ) General (see § 250.1909)
( 2 ) Safety and Environmental Information (see § 250.1910)
( 3 ) Hazards Analysis (see § 250.1911)
( 4 ) Management of Change (see § 250.1912)
( 5 ) Operating Procedures (see § 250.1913)
( 6 ) Safe Work Practices (see § 250.1914)
( 7 ) Training (see § 250.1915)
( 8 ) Mechanical Integrity (Assurance of Quality and Mechanical Integrity of Critical Equipment) (see § 250.1916)
( 9 ) Pre-startup Review (see § 250.1917)
( 10 ) Emergency Response and Control (see § 250.1918)
( 11 ) Investigation of Incidents (see § 250.1919)
( 12 ) Auditing (Audit of Safety and Environmental Management Program Elements) (*see* § 250.1920)
( 13 ) Recordkeeping (Records and Documentation) and additional BSEE requirements (*see* § 250.1928)
( 14 ) Stop Work Authority (SWA) (see § 250.1930)
( 15 ) Ultimate Work Authority (UWA) (see § 250.1931)
( 16 ) Employee Participation Plan (EPP) (see § 250.1932)
( 17 ) Reporting Unsafe Working Conditions (see § 250.1933).
( b ) You must include a job safety analysis (JSA) for OCS activities identified or discussed in your SEMS program (see § 250.1911).
( c ) Your SEMS program must meet or exceed the standards of safety and environmental protection of API RP 75 (as incorporated by reference in § 250.198).
[76 FR 64462, Oct. 18, 2011, as amended at 78 FR 20440, Apr. 5, 2013]
#### WOLF, Appellant, v. MANHATTAN CONSUMERS’ BREWING CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 10, 1905.)

Action by Margaret Wolf, as administratrix, against the Manhattan Consumers’ Brewing Company. A. L. Pincoffs, for appellant. J. V. Bouvier, Jr., for respondent. No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets and unaudited condensed
consolidated statements of income found on pages 3 and 4 of the Company's Form
10-QSB for the year to date, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             172
<SECURITIES>                                         0      
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   172  
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     372
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,508
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           125
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (2,011)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       372
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,034
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,034)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,034)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
For inclusion in docket no. EPA–HQ–OAR–2007–0492, Review of Particulate Matter National Ambient Air

Quality Standards (NAAQS)

EPA Meeting Summary  

Date of Meeting:  August 20, 2012

Topic:  Discuss PM NAAQS proposed rule section on Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD)  

Attendees:  Representatives from the following state and local air agencies:

Connecticut (Anne Gobin)   

New York (Dave Shaw)   

Maryland (Tad Aburn)   

Allegheny County, PA (Jim Thompson)   

Georgia (Jac Capp)   

Indiana (Keith Baugues)  

Louisiana (Tegan Treadaway)   

Kansas (Rick Brunetti)

Linn County, Iowa (Jim Hodina)   

Colorado (Garry Kaufman)   

California – CARB (Lynn Terry)   

Sacramento, CA (Larry Greene)   

Great Basin Air District, CA (Ted Schade)  

Puget Sound, WA (Craig Kenworthy)  

Nancy Kruger (National Association of Clean Air Agencies)

EPA representatives:  Michael Ling, Rich Damberg, Anna Wood, Raj Rao, Peter Keller, Dan deRoeck, Tyler

Fox, James Hemby, Sara Schneeberg, Brian Doster

Summary of Meeting:  EPA staff presented a summary of the PSD‐related elements of the June 2012 PM

NAAQS proposed revisions.  State and local air agency representatives asked questions and made

suggestions about the proposed PSD program revisions and related implementation issues.  EPA

indicated that for formal consideration of their comments, air agency representatives would need to

submit their comments during the public comment period of the PM NAAQS rulemaking.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3425 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3425

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require mandatory HIV testing 
of potential sources in the event of possible occupational exposure to 
       HIV in a Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2005

 Mr. Tancredo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to require mandatory HIV testing 
of potential sources in the event of possible occupational exposure to 
       HIV in a Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Health Administration 
Employee Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. MANDATORY HIV TESTING OF POTENTIAL SOURCES IN THE EVENT OF 
              POSSIBLE OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE TO HIV IN A DEPARTMENT OF 
              VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL FACILITY.

    (a) Mandatory Testing.--
            (1) In general.--Chapter 74 of title 38, United States 
        Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
        subchapter:

                    ``SUBCHAPTER VII--OTHER MATTERS

``Sec. 7481. Occupational exposures to HIV: mandatory testing of 
              potential sources
    ``(a) Testing Required.--Whenever an employee of the Department of 
Veterans Affairs incurs in an occupational setting a possible exposure 
to the human immunodeficiency virus, the Secretary shall test for that 
virus the person who is the source (or potential source) of the 
exposure.
    ``(b) Regulations.--The Secretary shall prescribe such regulations 
as required for purposes of this section. The Secretary may require in 
such regulations that consent to testing under subsection (a) shall 
be--
            ``(1) a condition of the receipt by any person of medical 
        care and services provided by the Department; and
            ``(2) a condition of employment of any person by the 
        Department.''.
            (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the 
        beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the 
        following:
                    ``subchapter vii--other matters
``7481. Occupational exposures to HIV: mandatory testing of potential 
                            sources.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Section 7481 of title 38, United States Code, 
as added by subsection (a), shall take effect on October 1, 2005.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 56.12006 Distribution boxes.

Distribution boxes shall be provided with a disconnecting device for each branch circuit. Such disconnecting devices shall be equipped or designed in such a manner that it can be determined by visual observation when such a device is open and that the circuit is deenergized, the distribution box shall be labeled to show which circuit each device controls.
### SUBCHAPTER B—OPERATIONS OF CARRIERS

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–287, §5(43)(B)(ii), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3393, made technical amendment to subchapter heading.
Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement of SendTec, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-137883) of our report dated April 8, 2008, except for the fourth, fifth and sixth paragraphs of Note 12, as to which the date is June 20, with respect to our
audit of the consolidated financial statements of SendTec, Inc. as of December 31, 2007 and for the year ended December 31, 2007, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A (Amendment No. 1) of SendTec, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 2007.



|                                  
|----------------------------------
|/s/ GREGORY, SHARER & STUART, P.A.
|                                  
|St. Petersburg, Florida           

June 20, 2008
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 14-209V

Filed: February 9, 2015

Not for Publication

*************************************

STEPHEN WALLEN, *

*

 Petitioner, * Attorneys’ fees and costs decision based on

 * stipulation of fact

v. *

 *

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

 *

 Respondent. *

*

*************************************

F. John Caldwell, Jr., Sarasota, FL, for petitioner.

Julia W. McInerny, Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1

On February 9, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an 

appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case. 

In accordance with General Order #9, petitioner asserts that he did not incur any costs in 

pursuit of his petition. Petitioner submitted his request for attorneys’ fees and costs to 

respondent. During informal discussions, respondent raised objections to certain aspects of

petitioner’s application. Based on these objections, petitioner amends his application for 

 

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this 

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal 

Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made 

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is 

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and 

move to redact such information prior to the document=s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, 

agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall 

redact such material from public access.
2

attorneys’ fees and costs to $21,950.00. Respondent does not object to this amount. The 

undersigned finds this amount to be reasonable. Accordingly, the court awards $21,950.00, 

representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs. The award shall be in the form of a 

check payable jointly to petitioner and Maglio, Christopher, & Toale, P.A. for $21,950.00.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the 

court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 9, 2015 s/ Laura D. Millman

 Laura D. Millman

 Special Master

 

2

Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or 

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

                                                                   Exhibit 27
                                TIME WARNER INC.
                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE


     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
financial  statements of Time Warner Inc. for the six months ended June 30, 1999
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                   304
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          3,272
<ALLOWANCES>                                             875
<INVENTORY>                                            2,761
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       4,903
<PP&E>                                                 3,459
<DEPRECIATION>                                         1,432
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        31,893
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  4,136
<BONDS>                                               10,765
<COMMON>                                                  12
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                2
<OTHER-SE>                                             9,078
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          31,893
<SALES>                                                6,840
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       6,840
<CGS>                                                  3,685
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          3,685
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       469
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        1,368
<INCOME-TAX>                                             637
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      731
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                             731
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0.54




</TABLE>