alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11.2

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                       Six Months Ended June 30,
                                                                                       -------------------------
                                                                                         1998              1997
                                                                                         ----              ----

<S>                                                                                   <C>                <C>       
 Basic

 Weighted average common shares outstanding (3)                                       13,419,000         12,164,000
                                                                                      ==========         ==========
 Net income after adjustment for preferred dividends earned on JIS stock               $ 872,646          $ 641,413
                                                                                       =========          =========
 Basic net income per common share                                                        $ 0.07             $ 0.05
                                                                                          ======             ======

 Diluted

 Weighted average common shares outstanding (1) (2) (3)                               13,420,000         12,295,000
                                                                                      ==========         ==========
 Net income after adjustment for preferred dividends earned on JIS stock and
 interest saved on conversion of debt                                                  $ 872,646          $ 641,413
                                                                                       =========          =========
 Diluted net income per common share                                                      $ 0.07             $ 0.05
                                                                                          ======             ======
</TABLE>

(1)      Options on 1,190,750 shares and 561,500 shares in 1998 and 1997,
         respectively, not included in computing diluted earnings per share
         because their effects are anti-dilutive.
(2)      In 1998 options to purchase 205,000 shares, less 182,000 shares to be
         purchased under the Treasury Stock method, are included in weighted
         average shares outstanding.
(3)      Excludes 40,000 shares of Treasury Stock from its date of purchase on
         February 28, 1998.
### §154. Repealed. Oct. 10, 1940, ch. 851, §4, 54 Stat. 1114

Section, act Apr. 22, 1926, ch. 171, 44 Stat. 314, related to purchases and services.
#### § 56.19065 Lowering conveyances by the brakes.

Conveyances shall not be lowered by the brakes alone except during emergencies.
### SUBCHAPTER I—COORDINATION FOR NATIONAL SECURITY
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001021907
<NAME> MS ACQUISITION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          11,307
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  165,202
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,921
<INVENTORY>                                    125,314
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               324,323
<PP&E>                                         381,098
<DEPRECIATION>                                 187,424
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 597,437
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          358,632
<BONDS>                                         85,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     41,440
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,879)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   597,437
<SALES>                                        473,296
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               473,296
<CGS>                                          427,295
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  427,295
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,754
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,644
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,397)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,901)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,496)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (3,244)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,740)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York v. Michael Kane.

Orders of this court, entered on the 13th day of July, 1961 and the 17th day of October, 1961, assigning Bernard Newman, Esq., as counsel for the defendant-appellant, are vacated, and Max Feigin, Esq., of 160 Broadway, New York, N. Y., is assigned as counsel for defendant-appellant in the place and stead of Bernard Newman, Esq. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, McNally and Bergan, JJ.
#### § 57.19079 Blocking mine cars.

Where mine cars are hoisted by cage or skip, means for blocking cars shall be provided at all landings and also on the cage.
§ 1210.51 Who must submit royalty reports? ( a ) Any person who pays royalty to ONRR must submit royalty reports to ONRR.
( b ) Before you pay or report to ONRR, you must obtain a payor code. To obtain a payor code, refer to the ONRR *Minerals Revenue Reporter Handbook* for instructions and ONRR contact information (also see § 1210.56 for information on how to obtain a handbook).
#### Katherina Houser, Respondent, v. Silver Set Realty Co., Inc., Appellant.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 10, 1962, as conditioned the granting of its motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution (Civ. Prae, Act, § 181; Rules Civ. Prae., rule 156) upon the plaintiff’s failure to serve and file a note of issue for a subsequent term of the court. Defendant contends that its motion to dismiss should have been granted unconditionally. Order, insofar as appealed from, reversed, without costs; the condition as to the filing of the note of issue is deleted; the defendant’s motion is granted unconditionally; and the .complaint is dismissed. Plaintiff failed to justify the delay herein or to show that it was reasonable; nor did plaintiff attempt .to do so. Upon that state of the .record, it was an improvident exercise of discretion for the Special Term Justice to refuse to grant unconditionally the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution *(Gostanzo*v. *Schwedler,*14 A D 2d 814). Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.1

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors

General Communication, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 33-60728 and No. 33-60222) on Forms S-8 of General Communication, Inc. of our reports dated March 15, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of General Communication, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006, annual report on Form 10-K of General Communication, Inc. 

Our report dated March 15, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of General Communication, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, refers to the adoption of the fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), *Share-Based Payment,* and a change in the method of quantifying errors to conform to Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, *Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements When Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements*.

Our report dated March 15, 2007,  on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, expresses our opinion that General Communication, Inc. did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 because of the effect of two material weaknesses on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria and contains explanatory paragraphs that state that General Communication, Inc.’s internal controls were inadequately designed in that its policies and procedures did not provide for (1) effective analysis and implementation of accounting pronouncements as applied to non-routine transactions and (2) the review of billing rate changes in two of their systems that produce invoices for common carrier customers. 

/s/ KPMG LLP

Anchorage, Alaska 

March 15, 2007
#### § 56.15004 Eye protection.

All persons shall wear safety glasses, goggles, or face shields or other suitable protective devices when in or around an area of a mine or plant where a hazard exists which could cause injury to unprotected eyes.
**CODE OF ETHICS OF**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF IMPSAT CORPORATION AND ITS CONSOLIDATED 
SUBSIDIARIES AS OF AND FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          64,573
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,998
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,356
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               135,628
<PP&E>                                         335,901
<DEPRECIATION>                                 136,514
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 511,323
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          100,148
<BONDS>                                        399,413
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          138,393
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       100,793
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   511,323
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,560
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,935
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,212
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   823
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,360
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (19,428)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,143
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,496)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 58.13 Responsibilities of the certifying officer. Under the terms of the certification required by § 58.71, a responsible entity's certifying officer is the “responsible Federal official” as that term is used in section 102 of NEPA and in statutory provisions cited in § 58.1(b). The Certifying Officer is therefore responsible for all the requirements of section 102 of NEPA and the related provisions in 40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508, and 24 CFR part 58, including the related Federal authorities listed in § 58.5. The Certifying Officer must also: ( a ) Represent the responsible entity and be subject to the jurisdiction of the Federal courts. The Certifying Officer will not be represented by the Department of Justice in court; and
( b ) Ensure that the responsible entity reviews and comments on all EISs prepared for Federal projects that may have an impact on the recipient's program.
### §206. Suspension of commercial intercourse with part of State in insurrection

Whenever any part of a State not declared to be in insurrection is under the control of insurgents, or is in dangerous proximity to places under their control, all commercial intercourse therein and therewith shall be subject to the prohibitions and conditions of section 205 of this title for such time and to such extent as shall become necessary to protect the public interests, and be directed by the Secretary of the Treasury, with the approval of the President.

(R.S. §5302.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §5302 derived from act July 2, 1864, ch. 225, §5, 13 Stat. 376.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


Shareholders
First Community Financial Corporation
Two North Main Street
Mifflintown, Pennsylvania


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of First Community
Financial Corporation and subsidiary (The First National Bank of Mifflintown) as
of December 31, 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income,
shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Corporation's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of First Community
Financial Corporation and subsidiary as of December 31, 2001, and the results of
their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.




                                               /s/  Greenawalt & Company, P.C.


January 24, 2002
Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania
#### The Schulenberg & Boeckler Lumber Company *v.*The City of East St. Louis.

*Filed at Mt. Vernon April 1, 1897.*

Appeals and *errors—when Appellate Court’s judgment will be affirmed.*A judgment of the Appellate Court in a suit at law will be affirmed by the Supreme Court where no questions of law are preserved in the record.

Schulenberg, *etc. Lumber Co.*v. *E. St. Louis,*63 Ill. App. 214, affirmed.

Writ op Error to the Appellate Court for the Fourth District;-—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair county; the Hon. A. S. Wilderman, Judge, presiding.

George C. Rebhan, and Franklin A. McConaughy, for plaintiff in error.

W. H. Bennett, City Attorney, (B. H. Canby, of counsel,) for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Carter

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff in error brought its action of trover in the St. Clair circuit court, against defendant in error, for the alleged conversion of certain moneys collected by it from its tax levies, which it appropriated to its general municipal uses, and against which it had previously issued and delivered to plaintiff in error its certain tax warrants in payment for lumber and materials sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant. The principal defense was, that defendant was indebted beyond the constitutional limit of five per cent of the taxable property within its limits.' By agreement, trial by jury was waived and the cause was tried by the court. Judgment was rendered for the defendant for costs. The Appellate Court, on appeal, affirmed the judgment.

*233No propositions to be held as law in the decision of the case were presented to the trial court by either party. Plaintiff raises no question in its brief or argument as to the rulings of the court in the admission or exclusion of evidence. There is therefore, as has so often been decided by this court in similar cases, no question of law presented to us for decision, and as the judgment of the Appellate Court is conclusive upon the facts, there is nothing that can be done here but to affirm the judgment of the Appellate Court. , . „ ,

*Judgment affirmed,.*
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

MAI Systems Corporation

Lake Forest, California

 

We hereby consent to incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-92194, 333-72412, 333-72414 and 333-72418)and Form S-3 (No. 333-57454) of MAI Systems Corporation of our reportdated April 25, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statementswhich appears in the Annual Report to Stockholders, which is incorporated inthis Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation byreference of our report dated April 25, 2005 relating to the financialstatement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

 

 
|   | /s/ BDO Seidman LLP |   |
|--------|---------------------|--------|

 

Costa Mesa, California

September 16, 2005

 

----
#### § 553.32 Are there alternative methods to demonstrate OSFR?

The Director may accept other methods to demonstrate OSFR that provide equivalent assurance of timely satisfaction of claims. This may include pooling, letters of credit, pledges of treasury notes, or other comparable methods. Submit your proposal, together with all the supporting documents, to the Director at the address listed in § 553.45. The Director's decision whether to approve your alternative method to evidence OSFR is by this rule committed to the Director's sole discretion and is not subject to administrative appeal under 30 CFR part 590 or 43 CFR part 4.
Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America
1750 Hennepin Avenue
Minneapolis, MN  55403
(612) 347-6500

May 8, 2000

VIA EDGAR

_________

Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Investment Management
Office of Insurance Products
450 Fifth Street N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

     RE:     Allianz Life Variable Account A
             File No.  33-15464
             ________________________________

Dear Sir/Madam:

Pursuant to Securities  Act Rule 497(j),  we hereby  certify that the Prospectus
that would have been filed under Rule 497(c) does not differ from that contained
in the most recent  Post-effective  Amendment,  which  Amendment has been filed
electronically.

If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact the
undersigned.

Sincerely,

Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America


By:  /s/  Catherine L. Mielke
    ________________________________
          Catherine L. Mielke
### SUBCHAPTER II—GENERAL RELIEF
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3546 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3546

  To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide for public 
  disclosure of average manufacturer prices (AMP) and best prices for 
                          prescription drugs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 28, 2005

Mr. Emanuel (for himself, Mr. Case, Mr. Lipinski, Ms. Herseth, and Mr. 
   Doggett) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide for public 
  disclosure of average manufacturer prices (AMP) and best prices for 
                          prescription drugs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prescription Drug Pricing and 
Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF AVERAGE MANUFACTURER PRICES (AMP) AND BEST 
              PRICES FOR PRESCRIPTION DRUGS.

    (a) Public Disclosure.--Subparagraph (D) of section 1927(b)(3) of 
the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r-8(b)(3)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of clause (ii);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of clause (iii) and 
        inserting ``, and''; and
            (3) by inserting after clause (iii) the following new 
        clause:
                            ``(iv) that the Secretary shall make 
                        publicly available the information reported 
                        under subparagraph (A)(i) on average 
                        manufacturer price and best price for each 
                        covered outpatient drug.''.
    (b) Reporting of Methodology and Assumptions for Computing Average 
Manufacturer Price.--Subparagraph (A) of such section is amended by 
adding at the end the following: ``The information reported under 
clause (i) shall include detailed information (specified by the 
Secretary) on how the manufacturer computes the average manufacturer 
price, including assumptions used in computing such price.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to rebate agreements, and information reported under such 
agreements, as of the date that is first day of the first calendar 
quarter beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### §§1021 to 1024. Repealed. Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §53, 70A Stat. 641

Section 1021, act July 9, 1952, ch. 608, pt. III, §301, 66 Stat. 498, established National Guard and Army Reserve as reserve components of the Army. See section 3062 of Title 10, Armed Forces.

Section 1022, act July 9, 1952, ch. 608, pt. III, §302, 66 Stat. 498, redesignated Organized Reserve Corps as Army Reserve.

Section 1023, act July 9, 1952, ch. 608, pt. III, §303, 66 Stat. 498, related to composition of Army Reserve. See section 10104 of Title 10.

Section 1024, act July 9, 1952, ch. 608, pt. III, §304, 66 Stat. 498, related to women in Army Reserve.