alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed August 25, 2016

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00832

- CR

____________ BRETT DAVID BOGUS , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 176th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1433472



### O R D E R

On July 14, 2016, this court abated this appeal for appointment of counsel. On August 9, 2016, the court reporter filed a record of the hearing in which the trial court agreed to appoint counsel on appeal. The appellate record does not contain the order appointing an attorney.The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s

record on or before September 8, 2016, containing the trial court’s order appointing

an attorney.

If the omitted item is n ot part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
Submitted on record, petitioner’s brief and joint motion to remand February 6,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration April 1, 1998

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Dennis L. Keller, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and Warn Industries, Inc., *Petitioners, v.*Dennis L. KELLER, Providence Medical Center, and Aetna Casualty Company, *Respondents.*

(93-11978, 93-07002; CA A97955)

956 P2d 1068

Michael O. Whitty filed the brief for petitioner.

Michael O. Whitty, Vera Langer and Robert Wollheim filed the joint motion to remand.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Armstrong, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. ORS 656.262(10); *Bay Area Hospital v.*Landers, 150 Or App 154, 945 P2d 110 (1997).
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9430 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to prohibit the acquisition of land, 

water, or an interest in land or water from a private landowner using 

amounts made available under the Land and Water Conservation Fund. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 30, 2024 

Mr. ARRINGTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to prohibit the acquisition of land, water, or an interest in land or water 

from a private landowner using amounts made available 

under the Land and Water Conservation Fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND AC4 QUISITION RESTRICTION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 200305 of title 54, United 

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9430 IH

1 ‘‘(l) ACQUISITION RESTRICTION.—A State that re2 ceives financial assistance from the Secretary under this 

3 section may not use such financial assistance for the ac4 quisition of land, water, or an interest in land or water 

5 from a private landowner.’’. 

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 200306(b) 

7 of title 54, United States Code, is amended by inserting 

8 ‘‘Appropriations from the Fund may not be used for ac9 quisition from a private landowner.’’ after ‘‘could be real10 ized.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
NUMBER 13-18-00086-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI C EDINBURG

CARLOS GOMEZ AMAYA, Appellant,

v.

BISSELL HOMECARE INC., Appellee.

On appeal from the 370th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

ORDER TO FILE APPELLANT'S BRIEF

Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Benavides

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on appellant’s fourth motion for extension of time to 

file the brief. Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on May 4, 2018, and this 

Court has previously granted appellant three extensions for the filing of appellant’s brief 

in this cause. Appellant has now filed his fourth motion requesting additional time to file 

the appellate brief in this cause.
2

The Court, having fully examined and considered appellant's fourth motion for 

extension of time to file the brief and the extensions previously granted in this cause, is 

of the opinion that, in the interest of justice, appellant's fourth motion for extension of time 

to file the brief should be granted with order. The Court, however, looks with disfavor 

upon the delay caused by counsel's failure to have filed a brief in this matter. 

Appellant's fourth motion for extension of time to file the brief is hereby granted, 

and the Honorable Charles H. Sierra, counsel for appellant, is hereby ORDERED to file 

the appellate brief with this Court on or before October 15, 2018. No further extensions 

will be granted in this matter absent exigent circumstances.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 

21st day of September, 2018.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         4,687,353
<SECURITIES>                                   9,558,127
<RECEIVABLES>                                  383,984
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               15,500,889
<PP&E>                                         768,059
<DEPRECIATION>                                 53,241
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 16,344,695
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,887,816
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    8,938
<COMMON>                                       4,077
<OTHER-SE>                                     14,443,864
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   16,344,695
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               8,348,232
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,038,277)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,038,277)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,038,277)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9459 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to enable secure and trustworthy technology through other transaction contracting authority, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 6, 2024 

Mr. GUEST (for himself and Mr. IVEY) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to enable 

secure and trustworthy technology through other transaction contracting authority, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Producing Advanced 

5 Technologies for Homeland Security Act’’ or the ‘‘PATHS 

6 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9459 IH

1 SEC. 2. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ACQUISITION 

2 PILOT PROGRAM EXTENSION. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 831 of the Homeland Se4 curity Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 391) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a)— 

6 (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), 

7 by striking ‘‘Until September 30, 2024, and 

8 subject to subsection (d)’’ and inserting ‘‘Until 

9 September 30, 2027, and subject to subsection 

10 (c)’’; and 

11 (B) by adding at the end the following new 

12 paragraph: 

13 ‘‘(3) OTHER TRANSACTION AUTHORITY INVOLV14 ING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE.—Not later than 72 

15 hours after the use or extension of the transaction 

16 authority authorized under paragraph (1) involving 

17 artificial intelligence technology, the Secretary shall 

18 notify the Committee on Appropriations and the 

19 Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 

20 Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Appro21 priations and the Committee on Homeland Security 

22 of the House of Representatives and offer a briefing 

23 explaining the reason for the use or extension.’’; and 

24 (2) in subsection (c)(1), in the matter preceding 

25 subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘September 30, 

26 2024’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2027’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 9459 IH

1 (b) REDUCTION IN AMOUNT OF COVERED CONTRACT

2 AWARD.—Subparagraph (A) of section 7113(d)(1) of the 

3 James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for 

4 Fiscal Year 2023 (6 U.S.C. 112 note; Public Law 117– 

5 263) is amended by striking ‘‘$4,000,000’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘$1,000,000’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22

- 10751 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**
versus **Alfredo Salazar Amaro,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:21

- CR

- 56

- 1

**______________________________** Before **Wiener, Elrod,** and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  ***** The attorney appointed to represent Alfredo Salazar Amaro has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Amaro has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the rel evant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir . R.**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 25, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-10751 Document: 00516622564 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/25/2023No. 22

- 10751

2 with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further respo nsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2
. Case: 22-10751 Document: 00516622564 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/25/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9514 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9514

To make certain modifications to the repayment for the Arkansas Valley 
                   Conduit in the State of Colorado.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 10, 2024

Ms. Boebert (for herself and Mr. Lopez) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make certain modifications to the repayment for the Arkansas Valley 
                   Conduit in the State of Colorado.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ARKANSAS VALLEY CONDUIT, COLORADO.

    Public Law 87-590 (76 Stat. 389) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c) of the first section (76 Stat. 390; 
        123 Stat. 1320), in the second sentence--
                    (A) by inserting ``, without interest,'' before 
                ``in an amount'';
                    (B) by striking ``that is comprised of revenue 
                generated by payments'' and inserting ``, which payment 
                shall only consist of funding provided during 
                construction from any person other than the 
                Secretary'';
                    (C) by inserting ``of'' before ``revenue that''; 
                and
                    (D) by inserting ``over a period of 100 years'' 
                after ``project facilities''; and
            (2) in section 2(b)(3)(A) (76 Stat. 390; 123 Stat. 1321)--
                    (A) by striking ``plus interest''; and
                    (B) by striking ``this section'' and inserting 
                ``subsection (c) of the first section''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 3.2

                                AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                     TO THE
                              AMENDED AND RESTATED
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                    PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 245 AND 303 OF THE
                GENERAL CORPORATION LAW OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                              BY AND ON BEHALF OF
                            MAI SYSTEMS CORPORATION


        MAI Systems Corporation, a Delaware corporation organized and existing
under and by virtue of the laws of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware (the "Corporation"), does hereby certify that:

                1.      This Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation amends and restates Articles FOURTH and FIFTH of
the Corporation's Certificate of Incorporation, in their entirety, as amended
to date, as follows:

        FOURTH:         In accordance with the provisions of Section 303 of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, the authorized capital stock
of the Corporation shall consist of 25,000,000 shares par value $0.01 per
share.

        FIFTH:          The total number of shares which the Corporation shall
have authority to issue is 25,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $.01
per share.  In accordance with Section 1123(a)(6) of Title 11 of the United
States Code, as amended and as in effect on the date of this Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the Corporation shall not issue any
nonvoting equity securities.

        A.      Dividends:  The holders of shares of Common Stock shall be
entitled to receive, when and if declared by the Board of Directors, out of the
assets of the Corporation which are by law available therefor, dividends payable
either in cash, property or shares of Common Stock.

        B.      Voting rights:  At every annual or special meeting of
stockholders of the Corporation, every holder of Common Stock shall be entitled
to one vote, in person or by proxy, for each share of Common Stock standing in
his or her name on the books of the Corporation.

        C.      Liquidation, Dissolution, or Winding Up:  In the event of any
voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the affairs
of the Corporation, after payment or provision for payment of the debts and
other liabilities of the Corporation, the holders of all outstanding shares of
Common Stock shall be entitled to share ratably in the remaining net assets of
the Corporation.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, MAI Systems Corporation has caused this Certificate
to be executed in its corporation name by its Vice President and its seal to be
hereunto affixed and attested by its Assistant Secretary this 21st day of May
1996.

MAI SYSTEMS CORPORATION


By:  /s/ STANLEY P. WITKOW              ATTEST BY:  /s/ ERIC CHRISTIANSEN
   ------------------------------                 ------------------------------
         Stanley P. Witkow                              Eric Christiansen
R18-2-526. Renumbered

Historical Note

Adopted effective May 14, 1979 (Supp. 79-1). Former Section R9-3-526 renumbered without 

change as Section R18-2-526 (Supp. 87-3). Amended effective September 26, 1990 

(Supp. 90-3). Renumbered to R18-2-726 effective November 15, 1993 (Supp. 93-4).

R18-2-726. Standards of Performance for Sandblasting Operations

No person shall cause or permit sandblasting or other abrasive blasting without minimizing dust 

emissions to the atmosphere through the use of good modern practices. Examples of good modern 

practices include wet blasting and the use of effective enclosures with necessary dust collecting 

equipment.

Historical Note

Section R18-2-726 renumbered from R18-2-526 effective November 15, 1993 (Supp. 93-4).
#### § 56.19009 Position indicator.

An accurate and reliable indicator of the position of the cage, skip, bucket, or cars in the shaft shall be provided.
#### § 56.13001 General requirements for boilers and pressure vessels.

All boilers and pressure vessels shall be constructed, installed, and maintained in accordance with the standards and specifications of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.
§ 57.11050 Escapeways and refuges. ( a ) Every mine shall have two or more separate, properly maintained escapeways to the surface from the lowest levels which are so positioned that damage to one shall not lessen the effectiveness of the others. A method of refuge shall be provided while a second opening to the surface is being developed. A second escapeway is recommended, but not required, during the exploration or development of an ore body.
( b ) In addition to separate escapeways, a method of refuge shall be provided for every employee who cannot reach the surface from his working place through at least two separate escapeways within a time limit of one hour when using the normal exit method. These refuges must be positioned so that the employee can reach one of them within 30 minutes from the time he leaves his workplace.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 951 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 951

 To prohibit educational institutions that require students to provide 
   information with respect to their menstrual cycles from receiving 
                             Federal funds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 2023

   Mr. Schiff (for himself, Mrs. Cherfilus-McCormick, and Ms. Omar) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                      Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit educational institutions that require students to provide 
   information with respect to their menstrual cycles from receiving 
                             Federal funds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Privacy in Education Regarding 
Individuals' Own Data Act'' or the ``PERIOD Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON RECEIPT OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR CERTAIN EDUCATIONAL 
              INSTITUTIONS.

    (a) Prohibition.--No Federal funds may be made available to any 
educational institution that requires any student at, or served by, 
such institution to provide information with respect to the menstrual 
cycle of such student.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Educational institution.--The term ``educational 
        institution'' means a local educational agency, State 
        educational agency, elementary school, secondary school, or 
        institution of higher education.
            (2) ESEA terms.--The terms ``elementary school'', ``local 
        educational agency'', ``secondary school'', and ``State 
        educational agency'' have the meanings given the terms in 
        section 8101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 
        1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801).
            (3) Institution of higher education.--The term 
        ``institution of higher education'' has the meaning given the 
        term in section 102 of Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
        1002).
                                 <all>
```
130 STAT. 1530 PUBLIC LAW 114–310—DEC. 16, 2016 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6282: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

Nov. 30, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 9, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–310 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2024 Jerome 

Avenue, in Bronx, New York, as the ‘‘Dr. Roscoe C. Brown, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DR. ROSCOE C. BROWN, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 2024 Jerome Avenue, in Bronx, New York, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Dr. Roscoe C. Brown, Jr. Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Dr. Roscoe C. Brown, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

Approved December 16, 2016. 

Dec. 16, 2016 

[H.R. 6282] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                               REPORT ON SCHEDULE
                                       AND
                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors
MAI Systems Corporation

The audits referred to in our report dated March 2, 2001, included the related
financial statement schedule for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2000, included in the annual report on Form 10-K. This
financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement schedule
based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a
whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth
therein.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-92194) on Form S-8, of MAI Systems Corporation of our report dated March 8,
2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of MAI Systems Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 2000, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficiency) and comprehensive
income (loss) and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2000 and the related financial statement schedule, which
reports appear in the December 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of MAI
Systems Corporation.


/s/ KPMG LLP



Orange County, California
October 26, 2001