alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §32102. Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary $9,562,500 for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to carry out this part in each fiscal year beginning in fiscal year 1999 and ending in fiscal year 2001.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1035; Pub. L. 105–178, title VII, §7102(b), June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 465; Pub. L. 106–39, §1(b), July 28, 1999, 113 Stat. 206.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 32102 | 15:1392 (note). | Dec. 18, 1991, Pub. L. 102–240, §2501(b), 105 Stat. 2081. |

Section

The reference to fiscal year 1992 is omitted as obsolete.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1999—Pub. L. 106–39 substituted "$9,562,500" for "$6,200,000".

1998—Pub. L. 105–178 reenacted section catchline without change and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "The following amounts may be appropriated to the Secretary of Transportation for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to carry out this part:

"(1) $6,731,430 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1993.

"(2) $6,987,224 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994.

"(3) $7,252,739 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995."
### §1421k. Designation of naval or military reservations; closed port

Nothing contained in this chapter shall be construed as limiting the authority of the President to designate parts of Guam as naval or military reservations, nor to restrict his authority to treat Guam as a closed port with respect to the vessels and aircraft of foreign nations.

(Aug. 1, 1950, ch. 512, §33, 64 Stat. 393.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Submerged Lands, Conveyance to Territory

Conveyance of submerged lands to the government of Guam, see section 1701 et seq. of this title.
MEMORANDUM

DATE: October 11, 2011

SUBJECT: Information on Conventional Spray Gun Use from Bryan Starnes of 

Linwood Furniture 

FROM: Nicholas Swanson, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/NRG 

TO: Docket No.: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0786

On May 23, 2011, Mr. Bryan Starnes of Linwood Furniture (located in Linwood, NC) responded 

via email (see Attachment) to an inquiry that I made regarding their use of conventional spray guns. 

From the information he provided in his email, I interpreted it to mean that he uses conventional spray 

guns because they have known finish quality and that changing now would mean changing something that 

does not need to be changed in Linwood Furniture’s spray coating process. Mr. Starnes also points out 

that conventional spray guns are permissible under the current MACT standards
Attachment
----

----

| Delaware                                                                |   | 1-9618                     |   | 36-3359573                                    |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
| (State      or other jurisdiction ofincorporation      or organization) |   | (Commission      File No.) |   | (I.R.S.      EmployerIdentification      No.) |

| 4201      Winfield Road, P.O. Box 1488, Warrenville, Illinois |   | 60555           |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------|
| (Address      of principal executive offices)                 |   | (Zip      Code) |

----

----

----

with cash onhand.  Monaco filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy relief March 5, 2009 inthe District of Delaware and the transaction was consummated following courtapproval. Under the terms of the asset purchase agreement, Navistar acquiredfive manufacturing facilities, intellectual property and trademarks and certaininventory. Daniel C. Ustian, Navistar’s Chairman, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer was on the board of directors of Monaco and recused himself from anyvote related to the transaction. Navistar and Monaco have a previousrelationship through their joint venture, Custom Chassis ProductsLLC.

----

|   | NAVISTAR      INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   | Registrant                              |

| Date:      June 10, 2009 | /s/ John      P.      Waldron                 |
|--------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     | John      P. WaldronVice      President andController                                                                              |
§ 285.833 What are the reporting requirements for incidents requiring written notification? ( a ) For any incident covered under § 285.831, you must submit a written report within 15 days after the incident to BSEE. The report must contain the following information: ( 1 ) Date and time of occurrence;
( 2 ) Identification and contact information for each lessee, grant holder, or operator;
( 3 ) Name and telephone number of the contractor and the contractor's representative, if a contractor is involved in the incident or injury;
( 4 ) Lease number, OCS area, and block;
( 5 ) Platform/facility name and number, or cable or pipeline segment number;
( 6 ) Type of incident or injury;
( 7 ) Activity at time of incident;
( 8 ) Description of incident, damage, or injury (including days away from work, restricted work, or job transfer), and any corrective action taken; and
( 9 ) Property or equipment damage estimate (in U.S. dollars).
( b ) You may submit a report or form prepared for another agency in lieu of the written report required by paragraph (a) of this section if the report or form contains all required information.
( c ) BSEE may require you to submit additional information about an incident on a case-by-case basis.
#### RUDTKE, Respondent, v. ROSEFF, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

February 11, 1903.)

Action by Valentine Rudtke against Samuel Roseff.

No opinion. Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs.
#### § 56.6203 Locomotives.

Explosive material shall not be transported on a locomotive. When explosive material is hauled by trolley locomotive, covered, electrically insulated cars shall be used.
### §10318. Wages on discharge in foreign ports

(a) When a master or seaman applies to a consular officer for the discharge of the seaman, the consular officer shall require the master to pay the seaman's wages if it appears that the seaman has carried out the agreement required by section 10302 of this title or otherwise is entitled to be discharged. Then the consular officer shall discharge the seaman. A consular officer shall require the payment of extra wages only as provided in this section or in chapter 109 of this title.

(b) When discharging a seaman, a consular officer who fails to require the payment of the wages due a seaman at the time, and of the extra wages due under subsection (a) of this section, is accountable to the United States Government for the total amount.

(c) A seaman discharged under this section with the consent of the seaman is entitled to wages up to the time of discharge, but not for any additional period.

(d) If the seaman is discharged involuntarily, and it appears that the discharge was not because of neglect of duty, incompetency, or injury incurred on the vessel, the master shall provide the seaman with employment on a vessel agreed to by the seaman or shall provide the seaman with one month's extra wages.

(e) Expenses for the maintenance and return of an ill or injured seaman to the United States shall be paid by the Secretary of State. If a seaman is incapacitated by illness or injury and prompt discharge is necessary, but a personal appearance of the master before a consular officer is impracticable, the master may provide transportation to the seaman to the nearest consular officer for discharge.

(f) A deduction from wages of the seaman is permitted only if the deduction appears in the account of the seaman required to be delivered under section 10310 of this title, except for matters arising after delivery of the account, in which case a supplementary account is required. During a voyage, the master shall record in the official logbook the matters about which deductions are to be made with the amounts of the deductions. The entries shall be made as the matters occur. The master shall produce the official logbook at the time of payment of wages, and also before a competent authority on the hearing of any complaint or question about the payment of wages.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 568.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 10318 | 46:68246:683 |

46:683

Section 10318 establishes consular officers' responsibilities in discharging seamen and the seamen's right to wages when discharged and when incapacitated by illness or injury. It also requires a master to record in the official logbook all matters for which deductions are to be made from seamen's wages.
### §16103. Unlawful disclosure of information

(a) General Prohibition.—A pipeline carrier providing transportation subject to this part, or an officer, agent, or employee of that carrier, or another person authorized to receive information from that carrier, that knowingly discloses to another person, except the shipper or consignee, or a person who solicits or knowingly receives information about the nature, kind, quantity, destination, consignee, or routing of property tendered or delivered to that carrier for transportation provided under this part without the consent of the shipper or consignee, if that information may be used to the detriment of the shipper or consignee or may disclose improperly, to a competitor the business transactions of the shipper or consignee, is liable to the United States for a civil penalty of not more than $1,000.

(b) Limitation on Statutory Construction.—This part does not prevent a pipeline carrier providing transportation under this part from giving information—

(1) in response to legal process issued under authority of a court of the United States or a State;

(2) to an officer, employee, or agent of the United States Government, a State, or a territory or possession of the United States; or

(3) to another carrier or its agent to adjust mutual traffic accounts in the ordinary course of business.

(c) Board Employee.—An employee of the Board delegated to make an inspection or examination under section 15722 who knowingly discloses information acquired during that inspection or examination, except as directed by the Board, a court, or a judge of that court, shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned for not more than 6 months, or both.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §106(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 931.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 11910 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Clarence Hosey, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered November 14, 1974, convicting defendant, after trial by jury, of first degree robbery and related offenses, and sentencing him as a predicate felon to an indeterminate term of 12 Vi to 25 years, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the sentence to 7 Vi to 15 years, and otherwise affirmed. The defendant was convicted of robbery in the first degree resulting from the holdup of a grocery store. The crime was a serious one and merited substantial punishment. However, on review of all of the factors relating to the robbery, we do not believe that there was justification for imposing the maximum sentence that was available. The sentence fixed seems to us excessive to the extent indicated. Concur —Birns, J. P., Silverman, Evans, Fein and Sandler, JJ.
§ 91.15 Submission date. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) In order to facilitate continuity in its program and to provide accountability to citizens, each jurisdiction should submit its consolidated plan to HUD at least 45 days before the start of its program year. (But see § 92.104 of this subtitle with respect to newly eligible jurisdictions under the HOME program.) With the exception of the August 16 date noted in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, HUD may grant a jurisdiction an extension of the submission deadline for good cause.
( 2 ) In no event will HUD accept a submission earlier than November 15 or later than August 16 of the federal fiscal year for which the grant funds are appropriated. Failure to receive the plan by August 16 will automatically result in a loss of the CDBG funds to which the jurisdiction would otherwise be entitled.
( 3 ) A jurisdiction may have a program year that coincides with the federal fiscal year (e.g., October 1, 2005 through September 30, 2006, for federal fiscal year 2006 funds). However, the consolidated plan may not be submitted earlier than November 15 of the federal fiscal year and HUD has the period specified in § 91.500 to review the consolidated plan.
( 4 ) See § 91.20 for HUD field office authorization to grant exceptions to these provisions.
( b ) *Frequency of submission.* ( 1 ) The summary of the citizen participation and consultation process, the action plan, and the certifications must be submitted on an annual basis.
( 2 ) The housing, and homeless needs assessment, market analysis, and strategic plan must be submitted at least once every five years, or as such time agreed upon by HUD and the jurisdiction in order to facilitate orderly program management, coordinate consolidated plans with time periods used for cooperation agreements, other plans, or the availability of data.
( 3 ) A jurisdiction may make amendments that extend the time period covered by their plan if agreed upon by HUD.
[71 FR 6961, Feb. 9, 2006]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned hereby certifies that (i) the foregoing Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by May 12, 2010 for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                   |  |                                              
|------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Date: May 13, 2010 |  | /s/ Ronald Leon Moore                        
|                   |  | Ronald Leon Moore                            
|                   |  | Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
|                   | 
|Date: May 13, 2010 |  | /s/ J. Alan Dickerson                        
|                   |  | J. Alan Dickerson                            
|                   |  | Vice President & Chief Financial Officer     



23
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________ DEGELMAN INDUSTRIES, LTD ., Plaintiff

- Appellant,
v. PRO

- TECH WELDING AND FAB RICATION, INC. AND MICHAEL P. WEAGLEY , Defendants

- Appellee s.

__________________________ 2013

- 15 69

__________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of New York in No

. 06

- CV

- 6346, Magi strate Judge Jonathan W. Feldman

.

__________________________ ON MOTION

__________________________ O R D E R Degelman Industries, Ltd. moves to withdraw th is appeal

. Upon consideration thereof, I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The motion is granted. The appeal is di s missed. Case: 13-1569 Document: 10 Page: 1 Filed: 09/25/2013DEGELMAN INDUSTRIES , LTD
. V
. PRO

- TECH WELDING 2
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs

.
F OR T HE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk

ISSUED AS A M ANDATE : September 25, 2013 s21 Case: 13-1569 Document: 10 Page: 2 Filed: 09/25/2013
### §336. Civil penalty procedures

(a) After notice and an opportunity for a hearing, a person found by the Secretary of Transportation to have violated a provision of law that the Secretary carries out through the Maritime Administrator or the Commandant of the Coast Guard or a regulation prescribed under that law by the Secretary for which a civil penalty is provided, is liable to the United States Government for the civil penalty provided. The amount of the civil penalty shall be assessed by the Secretary by written notice. In determining the amount of the penalty, the Secretary shall consider the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the prohibited acts committed and, with respect to the violator, the degree of culpability, any history of prior offenses, ability to pay, and other matters that justice requires.

(b) The Secretary may compromise, modify, or remit, with or without consideration, a civil penalty until the assessment is referred to the Attorney General.

(c) If a person fails to pay an assessment of a civil penalty after it has become final, the Secretary may refer the matter to the Attorney General for collection in an appropriate district court of the United States.

(d) The Secretary may refund or remit a civil penalty collected under this section if—

(1) application has been made for refund or remission of the penalty within one year from the date of payment; and

(2) the Secretary finds that the penalty was unlawfully, improperly, or excessively imposed.

(Added Pub. L. 101–225, title III, §305(1), Dec. 12, 1989, 103 Stat. 1924.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of authorities, functions, personnel, and assets of the Coast Guard, including the authorities and functions of the Secretary of Transportation relating thereto, to the Department of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 468(b), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.414 What must my drilling prognosis include? Your drilling prognosis must include a brief description of the procedures you will follow in drilling the well. This prognosis includes but is not limited to the following: ( a ) Projected plans for coring at specified depths;
( b ) Projected plans for logging;
( c ) Planned safe drilling margin that is between the estimated pore pressure and the lesser of estimated fracture gradients or casing shoe pressure integrity test and that is based on a risk assessment consistent with expected well conditions and operations. ( 1 ) Your safe drilling margin must also include use of equivalent downhole mud weight that is: ( i ) Greater than the estimated pore pressure; and
( ii ) Except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, a minimum of 0.5 pound per gallon below the lower of the casing shoe pressure integrity test or the lowest estimated fracture gradient.
( 2 ) In lieu of meeting the criteria in paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section, you may use an equivalent downhole mud weight as specified in your APD, provided that you submit adequate documentation (such as risk modeling data, off-set well data, analog data, seismic data) to justify the alternative equivalent downhole mud weight. You may submit such justification in advance of your full APD, and BSEE may consider such justification for approval when submitted. Any such approval will be contingent upon your confirmation in the APD that your plans and the information underlying your approved justification have not changed.
( 3 ) When determining the pore pressure and lowest estimated fracture gradient for a specific interval, you must consider related off-set and analogous well behavior observations, if available.
( d ) Estimated depths to the top of significant marker formations;
( e ) Estimated depths to significant porous and permeable zones containing fresh water, oil, gas, or abnormally pressured formation fluids;
( f ) Estimated depths to major faults;
( g ) Estimated depths of permafrost, if applicable;
( h ) A list and description of all requests for using alternate procedures or departures from the requirements of this subpart in one place in the APD. You must explain how the alternate procedures afford an equal or greater degree of protection, safety, or performance, or why the departures are requested;
( i ) Projected plans for well testing (refer to § 250.460);
( j ) The type of wellhead system and liner hanger system to be installed and a descriptive schematic, which includes but is not limited to pressure ratings, dimensions, valves, load shoulders, and locking mechanisms, if applicable; and
( k ) Any additional information required by the District Manager needed to clarify or evaluate your drilling prognosis.
[76 FR 64462, Oct. 18, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 26017, Apr. 29, 2016; 84 FR 21973, May 15, 2019]
TABLE OF CONTENTS     ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS  3 ARTICLE 2. OPERATIONAL SUPPORT  3 ARTICLE 3. OBLIGATIONS OF PARTY B  4 ARTICLE 4. CONSIDERATION FOR PROVIDING OPERATIONAL SUPPORT  4 ARTICLE 5. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES  4 ARTICLE 6. CONFIDENTIALITY  4 ARTICLE 7. GOVERNING LAW AND OBLIGATIONS UPON DEFAULT  5 ARTICLE 8. DISPUTE RESOLUTION  5 ARTICLE 9. EFFECTIVENESS  5 ARTICLE 10. NO SUBSEQUENT OBLIGATION  5 ARTICLE 11. AMENDMENT  5 ARTICLE 12. COUNTERPARTS  5 ARTICLE 13. MISCELLANEOUS  6 EXHIBIT 1 CONSIDERATION FOR OPERATION GUARANTEE  7 
 

 
OPERATION AGREEMENTThis Operation Agreement (“this Agreement”) is entered into in Beijing, People’s Republic of China(the “PRC”) on June 8, 2008 between:Party A: Fortune Software (Beijing) Co., Ltd
###### Editorial Note on Part 982

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999, and at 89 FR 38293, May 7, 2024.

#### § 982.616 Shared housing: Lease and HAP contract.

For assistance in a shared housing unit, there is a separate HAP contract and lease for each assisted family.
#### BOPP v. NEW YORK ELECTRIC VEHICLE CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 20. 1903.)

Action by Ida E. Bopp against the New York Electric Vehicle Company.

No opinion. Motion denied.