80766 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 240 / Monday, December 14, 2020 / Notices 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Census Bureau 

[Docket Number 201105–0290] 

Change to County Equivalents in the 

State of Connecticut 

AGENCY: Bureau of the Census, 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed program and 

request for comments. 

SUMMARY: This notice provides 

information about the State of 

Connecticut’s (hereafter Connecticut or 

the State) formal request to the Bureau 

of the Census (hereafter, Census Bureau) 

to adopt the State’s nine planning 

regions as the county equivalent 

geographic unit for purposes of 

collecting, tabulating, and disseminating 

statistical data, replacing the eight 

counties, which ceased to function as 

governmental and administrative 

entities in 1960. The Census Bureau 

proposes to implement this change in 

2023. The Census Bureau is publishing 

this Notice to inform users of countylevel data of the proposed change and 

is requesting information related to 

potential impacts of this change. The 

Census Bureau and the State of 

Connecticut will use this information to 

reach a final decision regarding whether 

to implement this change to the county 

equivalents in Connecticut as well as 

the timing of implementation. 

DATES: Written comments on this notice 

must be submitted on or before February 

12, 2021. 

ADDRESSES: Please direct all written 

comments on this proposed program to 

Vincent Osier, Geographic Standards, 

Criteria, and Quality Branch, Geography 

Division, U.S. Census Bureau, Room 

4H173, 4600 Silver Hill Road, 

Washington, DC 20233–7400. Email: 

geo.geography@census.gov. Phone: 301– 

763–1128. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Requests for additional information on 

this proposed program should be 

directed to Vincent Osier, Geographic 

Standards, Criteria, and Quality Branch, 

Geography Division, U.S. Census 

Bureau, Room 4H173, 4600 Silver Hill 

Road, Washington, DC 20233–7400. 

Email: Vincent.osier@census.gov. 

Phone: 301–763–9039 or 301–763–1128. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

notice provides information about the 

State of Connecticut’s formal request to 

the Census Bureau to adopt the State’s 

nine planning regions, designated under 

Section 16a–4a(4) of the Connecticut 

General Statutes, as the countyequivalent geographic unit for purposes 

of collecting, tabulating, and 

disseminating statistical data. The 

Census Bureau seeks information and 

comments related to the impact that 

adoption of planning regions as county 

equivalents might have on data analysis, 

planning and decision making, and 

program implementation; specifically, 

(1) are there data collection and 

tabulation programs or nonstatistical 

programs that will not be able to 

implement this change; (2) will the 

proposed change in county equivalents 

pose such a substantial break in data 

continuity that longitudinal analyses are 

not possible; and (3) are there specific 

programs and other uses of county-level 

information in which continued 

reference to the more familiar current 

counties is advisable and preferred? 

The Census Bureau strives to provide 

statistical data for geographic areas that 

are meaningful and relevant to analysis 

and decision-making. In Connecticut, 

nine councils of governments (COGs) 

exist to address matters of mutual 

interest to their constituent cities and 

towns, with each city and town 

represented by its municipal chief 

elected official. Connecticut’s counties 

ceased to function as governmental and 

administrative entities in 1960. 

The nine COGs function as regional 

planning organizations, coordinating 

activities for their constituent cities and 

towns, and in that capacity can exercise 

a variety of responsibilities typically 

undertaken by counties in other states. 

As such, the planning regions are more 

meaningful and relevant areas for 

tabulation and dissemination of 

statistical data within Connecticut as 

well as for regional and national county 

comparisons, than are the eight 

counties. The Census Bureau proposes 

to implement this change in 2023, and 

use the new county equivalents when 

reporting demographic and economic 

statistical data referenced to 2023 and 

all years thereafter. 

Background 

Officials with the Connecticut Office 

of Policy and Management contacted the 

Census Bureau in October 2017 

regarding the possibility of replacing the 

State’s eight counties with the State’s 

nine planning regions for purposes of 

collecting, tabulating, and disseminating 

statistical data. Connecticut officials 

noted that cities and towns, not 

counties, are the primary units of local 

government. 

Although Connecticut’s eight counties 

have long provided stable geographic 

units for reporting statistical data, they 

have not served as functional 

governmental and administrative 

entities since county government was 

abolished in 1960. The State’s nine 

COGs function as regional planning 

organizations, coordinating activities for 

their constituent cities and towns (note, 

however, that in some instances the 

name of the planning region differs from 

that of its COG). As such, planning 

regions provide a more meaningful 

geographic unit for reporting data since 

the data would be aligned with the 

collection of municipalities (i.e., cities 

and towns) that constitute the 

governance framework for each COG. 

Each municipality within a designated 

planning region is entitled to 

membership in the region’s COG upon 

adoption of an ordinance by its 

legislative body. The chief elected 

official of each member municipality is 

then provided a vote on all COG 

matters. By reporting statistical data for 

COGs, member municipalities will be in 

a better position to plan and act 

collaboratively and strategically on the 

efficient delivery of services, bulk 

purchasing, and other matters of 

practical interest. 

While COGs do not have the authority 

to levy taxes, they are authorized under 

State law to assess dues on their 

member municipalities, to accept other 

sources of public and private assistance 

for the purpose of providing regional 

and shared services, and to administer 

a regional property tax base revenue 

sharing system if approved by a 

unanimous vote of its member 

municipalities. In this regard, as well as 

the ability to provide the variety of 

services listed below, the Connecticut’s 

COGs and associated planning regions 

have the authority to carry out 

administrative functions that are 

typically found among counties in other 

states. Section 8–31b(b) of the 

Connecticut General Statutes states that 

Regional services provided to member 

municipalities shall be determined by each 

regional council of governments . . . and 

may include, without limitation, the 

following services: (1) Engineering; (2) 

inspectional and planning; (3) economic 

development; (4) public safety; (5) emergency 

management; (6) animal control; (7) land use 

management; (8) tourism promotion; (9) 

social; (10) health; (11) education; (12) data 

management; (13) regional sewerage; (14) 

housing; (15) computerized mapping; (16) 

household hazardous waste collection; (17) 

recycling; (18) public facility siting; (19) 

coordination of master planning; (20) 

vocational training and development; (21) 

solid waste disposal; (22) fire protection; (23) 

regional resource protection; (24) regional 

impact studies; and (25) transportation. 

In the same section, the COGs are 

authorized to ‘‘accept or participate in 

any grant, donation or program made 

available to counties by any other 

governmental or private entity.’’ 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 240 / Monday, December 14, 2020 / Notices 80767 

Adoption of COGs as county equivalents 

will make them eligible to apply for 

federal grant programs open to counties. 

Scope of Change 

Adoption of the nine planning regions 

as county equivalents applies to the 

collection, tabulation, and 

dissemination of Census Bureau 

statistical data for Connecticut. The 

Census Bureau proposes to implement 

this change in 2023, and will use 

planning regions in all of its programs 

that collect, tabulate, and disseminate 

demographic or economic data, such as 

the American Community Survey 

(ACS), the intercensal Population 

Estimates Program, Small Area Income 

and Poverty Estimates (SAIPE) Program, 

the Economic Census, County Business 

Patterns, and the Longitudinal 

Employer-Household Dynamics 

Program. While other federal agencies 

are encouraged to adopt Connecticut’s 

planning regions as county equivalents 

for use in their statistical and nonstatistical programs, the Census Bureau 

does not have the authority to require 

such a change. Nevertheless, adoption 

of planning regions as county 

equivalents will assure comparability of 

data produced by all federal agencies as 

well as comparability between statistical 

and non-statistical programs. 

Transitioning From Counties to 

Planning Regions 

Relationship Between Counties and 

Planning Regions 

Figure 1 depicts the relationship 

between Connecticut’s eight counties 

and its nine planning regions. Although 

the planning regions and counties do 

not align, there is substantial overlap, to 

the extent that one can discern the 

relationships between individual 

planning regions and counties. The 

closest relationship is between 

Middlesex County and Lower 

Connecticut River Valley planning 

region, with all 15 of the cities and 

towns within the county also located 

within the planning region (which also 

contains two towns located in New 

London County. See Table 2). 

Cities and towns are the constituent 

governments within each COG/planning 

region. As such, data for cities and 

towns can be aggregated to planning 

regions, facilitating reconstruction of 

time series data and longitudinal 

analysis. Table 1 provides the 2010 

Census population and the 2019 

estimated population for each planning 

region, based on aggregated data for 

constituent cities and towns. 

Source: https://www.census.gov/data/ 

tables/time-series/demo/popest/2010stotal-cities-and-towns.html 

TABLE 1—PLANNING REGION POPULATION: 2010 AND 2019 

Planning region 2010 Census 

population 

2019 

Population 

estimate 

Capitol ...................................................................................................................................................................... 973,959 969,831 

Greater Bridgeport ................................................................................................................................................... 318,004 320,921 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICESEN14DE20.091</GPH>
80768 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 240 / Monday, December 14, 2020 / Notices 

TABLE 1—PLANNING REGION POPULATION: 2010 AND 2019—Continued 

Planning region 2010 Census 

population 

2019 

Population 

estimate 

Lower Connecticut River Valley .............................................................................................................................. 175,686 172,058 

Naugatuck Valley ..................................................................................................................................................... 448,738 442,869 

Northeastern Connecticut ........................................................................................................................................ 96,617 95,570 

Northwest Hills ......................................................................................................................................................... 115,247 110,102 

South Central Connecticut ....................................................................................................................................... 570,001 566,579 

Southeastern Connecticut ....................................................................................................................................... 286,711 277,635 

Western Connecticut ............................................................................................................................................... 589,135 609,722 

Table 2 provides the number of cities 

and towns within each of the eight 

counties and the number within 

corresponding planning regions, further 

illustrating the overlap between 

counties and planning regions. 

TABLE 2—DISTRIBUTION OF CITIES AND TOWNS WITHIN COUNTIES AND PLANNING REGIONS. 

County 

Cities and 

towns in 

county 

Cities and towns within planning regions 

Capitol Greater 

bridgeport 

Lower CT river 

valley 

Naugatuck valley Northeastern 

CT NW Hills South central CT 

Southeastern 

CT Western CT 

Fairfield .................. 23 ........................ 6 ........................ 1 ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ 16 

Hartford ................. 29 26 ........................ ........................ 1 ........................ 2 

Litchfield ................ 26 ........................ ........................ ........................ 5 ........................ 19 ........................ ........................ 2 

Middle-sex ............. 15 ........................ ........................ 15 

New Haven ............ 27 ........................ ........................ ........................ 12 ........................ ........................ 15 

New London .......... 21 ........................ ........................ 2 ........................ 1 ........................ ........................ 18 

Tolland ................... 13 12 ........................ ........................ ........................ 1 

Wind-ham .............. 15 ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ 14 ........................ ........................ 1 

Total ............... 169 38 6 17 19 16 21 15 19 18 

Using the distribution of cities and 

towns within counties and planning 

regions as a guide, Table 3 presents the 

approximate relationship between 

counties and planning regions, which 

could be used when building 

longitudinal data for geographic areas 

for which counties and county 

equivalents are building blocks if 

component city- and town-level data 

were not available. 

TABLE 3—COUNTIES-TO-PLANNING REGIONS APPROXIMATION

County 

2018 County 

population 

estimate 

Planning region 

2019 Planning 

region 

population 

estimate 

Fairfield ............................................ ........................ Greater Bridgeport ..................................................................................... 320,921 

943,823 Western Connecticut ................................................................................. 609,722ROW≤ 

Hartford ............................................ 892,697 Capitol ....................................................................................................... 969,831 

Tolland ............................................. 150,921 

Litchfield ........................................... 181,111 Northwest Hills .......................................................................................... 110,102 

Middlesex ......................................... 162,682 Lower Connecticut River Valley ................................................................ 172,058 

New Haven ...................................... 857,620 Naugatuck Valley ...................................................................................... 442,869 

South Central Connecticut ........................................................................ 566,579 

New London ..................................... 266,784 Southeastern Connecticut ......................................................................... 277,635 

Windham .......................................... 117,027 Northeastern Connecticut .......................................................................... 95,570 

To assist with transitioning from 

counties to planning regions and to 

assist with development of longitudinal 

data for the new county equivalents, the 

Census Bureau will produce and make 

available reference files identifying the 

cities and towns that constitute each 

planning region. This will facilitate 

aggregation of data from decennial 

censuses, the ACS, the intercensal 

Population Estimates Program, SAIPE, 

the Economic Census, and the 

Longitudinal Employer-Household 

Dynamics Program, all of which collect, 

tabulate, and disseminate data for cities 

and towns in Connecticut. In addition, 

the Census Bureau will produce and 

make available other reference files, 

identifying the relationships between 

various sub-state and sub-county 

geographic areas and the planning 

regions. 

Upon adoption of this change, the 

Census Bureau will include planning 

regions in all geospatial data products, 

including TIGER/Line shapefiles, 

TIGER/Line geodatabases, cartographic 

boundary files, and mapping services. 

Each planning region will be assigned 

a three-digit Federal Information 

Processing Series (FIPS) code, starting 

with 017, and continuing in 

alphabetical order by name (Table 4). 

Codes 001 through 015 will continue to 

reference the eight counties but will be 

retired. Each planning region also will 

be assigned an eight-digit American 

National Standards Institute (ANSI) 

code and will be included in the U.S. 

Board on Geographic Names’ 

Geographic Names Information System. 

In addition, the Census Bureau will 

work with the State of Connecticut to 

determine the appropriate FIPS class 

code, functional status code, and other 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 240 / Monday, December 14, 2020 / Notices 80769 

codes that describe the attributes of the 

planning regions. The FIPS codes, ANSI 

codes, and attribute codes will be 

included in Census Bureau geographic 

reference products when this proposed 

change is adopted. 

TABLE 4—PLANNING REGION NAMES, LEGAL/STATISTICAL AREA DESCRIPTION, AND FEDERAL INFORMATION PROCESSING

SERIES (FIPS) CODES

Name FIPS statecounty code 

Capitol Planning Region ...................................................................................................................................................................... 09017 

Greater Bridgeport Planning Region ................................................................................................................................................... 09019 

Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region ............................................................................................................................... 09021 

Naugatuck Valley Planning Region ..................................................................................................................................................... 09023 

Northeastern Connecticut Planning Region ........................................................................................................................................ 09025 

Northwest Hills Planning Region ......................................................................................................................................................... 09027 

South Central Connecticut Planning Region ....................................................................................................................................... 09029 

Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region ........................................................................................................................................ 09031 

Western Connecticut Planning Region ................................................................................................................................................ 09033 

Relationship to Other Statistical 

Geographic Entities 

The Census Bureau accounted for the 

change from counties to planning 

regions when implementing the 

Participant Statistical Areas Program 

(PSAP) for the 2020 Census, the 

program in which the Census Bureau 

works with local officials to review and 

update block groups and census tracts. 

The planning regions were the official 

PSAP participants in Connecticut for 

both the 2010 and 2020 censuses, thus 

ensuring that census tracts and block 

groups generally aligned with city and 

town boundaries, facilitating transition 

to the new county equivalents. The 

Census Bureau further reviewed block 

group and census tract boundaries for 

the 2020 Census to ensure alignment 

with planning region boundaries. As a 

result, the change to county equivalents 

in Connecticut will not affect block 

group and census tract boundaries. Both 

types of entities will nest within 

planning region boundaries. 

The adoption of planning regions as 

county equivalents will affect the 

delineation of Metropolitan and 

Micropolitan Statistical Areas as well as 

Combined Statistical Areas by the Office 

of Management and Budget. Areas 

delineated based on 2020 Census and 

2016–2020 ACS 5-year data will reflect 

the new county equivalents. New 

England City and Town Areas (NECTAs) 

and combined NECTAs are not affected 

by this change. 

Timeline 

The Census Bureau proposes to 

implement adoption of the nine 

planning regions as county equivalents 

in 2023 and include the planning 

regions in all geospatial and statistical 

data products referenced to 2023 and 

each year thereafter. 

Officials with the State of 

Connecticut’s Office of Policy and 

Management contacted the Census 

Bureau in October 2017 regarding the 

process they should follow in order to 

adopt the State’s nine planning regions 

as county equivalents. At that time, 

Census Bureau staff advised that 

officials first obtain broad data user 

support throughout the State, including 

from other State agencies, the State Data 

Center, as well as the planning regions. 

Once broad support for the change was 

achieved, a formal request addressed to 

the Census Bureau’s Director was 

needed for the Census Bureau to take 

formal steps toward adoption of the 

nine planning regions as county 

equivalents. The State’s formal request 

was received by the Census Bureau in 

August 2019. The State also submitted 

a letter of support from the Connecticut 

Data Collaborative/State Data Center 

attesting to the importance and value of 

data for planning regions to analysts, 

decision makers, and other data users 

throughout Connecticut as well as broad 

support for the change among data users 

throughout the State. In addition, 

members of Connecticut’s Congressional 

Delegation, chairs of each of the State’s 

nine COGs, and officials from the 

Connecticut Conference of 

Municipalities, Council of Small Towns, 

and the Advisory Commission on 

Intergovernmental Relations were 

copied on the State’s letter to the Census 

Bureau. The Census Bureau held a 

meeting with Connecticut State and 

local government officials, state agency 

staff, and COG chairs in April 2020 to 

provide an update on outreach 

regarding the proposed change; meeting 

participants reiterated the importance 

of, and support for, adoption of the 

State’s nine planning regions as county 

equivalents. 

The Census Bureau began outreach to 

other federal agencies and data users 

regarding this change in October 2019, 

following the State of Connecticut’s 

formal request to replace its eight 

counties with the nine planning regions. 

The Census Bureau has held seven 

briefings for federal agency staff: one for 

the Interagency Council on Statistical 

Policy; two organized by the Federal 

Committee on Statistical MethodologyGeospatial Interest Group; two for 

Department of Housing and Urban 

Development staff, including staff 

managing the Community Development 

Block Grant and other funding 

programs; one for Bureau of Labor 

Statistics staff; and one organized by the 

US Department of Transportation 

attended by federal, state, and local 

transportation planners. This Notice 

serves as the formal process by which 

the Census Bureau is announcing the 

intended change and through which it 

will gather formal comments. 

Following completion of the formal 

period of comment associated with this 

Notice, the Census Bureau, in 

consultation with officials with the 

State of Connecticut, will review 

comments received and reach a final 

decision regarding whether to 

implement adoption of the nine 

planning regions as county equivalents. 

TABLE 4—TIMELINE OF ACTIVITIES

Activity Dates 

Officials from the State of Connecticut’s Office of Policy and Management contact Census Bureau regarding proposed adoption of planning regions as county equivalents.October 2017. 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
80770 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 240 / Monday, December 14, 2020 / Notices 

TABLE 4—TIMELINE OF ACTIVITIES—Continued 

Activity Dates 

Office of Policy and Management staff conduct outreach at the State-level to obtain consensus for change ............ November 2017–March 

2019. 

Formal request from the State of Connecticut to the Census Bureau’s Director regarding adoption of planning regions as county equivalents.August 2019. 

Census Bureau outreach to federal agencies and other data users ............................................................................ September 2019–present. 

Federal Register Notice announcing the Census Bureau’s proposed implementation of the change in county 

equivalents.

Fall 2020. 

Census Bureau, in consultation with the State of Connecticut, issues final decision regarding adoption of planning 

regions as county equivalents.

Summer 2021. 

Steven D. Dillingham, Director, 

Bureau of the Census, approved the 

publication of this Notice in the Federal 

Register. 

Dated: December 9, 2020. 

Sheleen Dumas, 

Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of 

the Chief Information Officer, Commerce 

Department. 

[FR Doc. 2020–27459 Filed 12–11–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–07–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Census Bureau 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Submission to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

Review and Approval; Comment 

Request; Annual Capital Expenditures 

Survey 

The Department of Commerce will 

submit the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and clearance in accordance 

with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995, on or after the date of publication 

of this notice. We invite the general 

public and other Federal agencies to 

comment on proposed, and continuing 

information collections, which helps us 

assess the impact of our information 

collection requirements and minimize 

the public’s reporting burden. Public 

comments were previously requested 

via the Federal Register on September 

10, 2020 during a 60-day comment 

period. This notice allows for an 

additional 30 days for public comments. 

Agency: U.S. Census Bureau. 

Title: Annual Capital Expenditures 

Survey. 

OMB Control Number: 0607–0782. 

Form Number(s): ACE–1(L), ACE– 

1(M), ACE–1(S), ACE–2. 

Type of Request: Regular submission, 

Request for a Revision of a Currently 

Approved Collection. 

Number of Respondents: 70,127. 

Average Hours per Response: 2.69. 

Burden Hours: 188,787. 

Needs and Uses: A major concern of 

economic policymakers is the adequacy 

of investment in plant and equipment. 

Data on the amount of business 

expenditures for new plants and 

equipment and measures of the stock of 

existing facilities are critical to 

evaluating productivity growth, the 

ability of U.S. business to compete with 

foreign business, changes in industrial 

capacity, and overall economic 

performance. The ACES is the sole 

source of detailed comprehensive 

statistics on investment in buildings and 

other structures, machinery, and 

equipment by private nonfarm 

businesses in the United States. 

This request is for a revision to the 

currently approved collection and will 

cover the 2020 through 2022 ACES 

(conducted in years 2021 through 2023). 

Changes from the previous ACES 

authorization are the collection of 

content related to the Coronavirus 

Pandemic, the presence of robotic 

equipment and investment in robotic 

equipment by industry segment from 

employer businesses, and the amount of 

time it took to complete the 

nonemployer survey. The detailed 

capital expenditures data, collected 

every five years, were collected in the 

2017 ACES and will be collected again 

in the 2022 ACES. 

Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations. 

Frequency: Annually. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory. 

Legal Authority: Title 13 of the United 

States Code, Sections 131 and 182. 

Sections 224 and 225 of Title 13 make 

this survey mandatory. 

This information collection request 

may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov. 

Follow the instructions to view the 

Department of Commerce collections 

currently under review by OMB. 

Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be 

submitted within 30 days of the 

publication of this notice on the 

following website www.reginfo.gov/ 

public/do/PRAMain. Find this 

particular information collection by 

selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day 

Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or 

by using the search function and 

entering either the title of the collection 

or the OMB Control Number 0607–0782. 

Sheleen Dumas, 

Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of 

the Chief Information Officer, Commerce 

Department. 

[FR Doc. 2020–27462 Filed 12–11–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–07–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[S–217–2020] 

Foreign-Trade Zone 22—Chicago, 

Illinois; Application for Subzone 

Expansion; Abbott Laboratories, 

Itasca, Illinois 

An application has been submitted to 

the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board by 

the Illinois International Port District, 

grantee of FTZ 22, requesting an 

expansion of Subzone 22F on behalf of 

Abbott Laboratories (Abbott), located in 

Itasca, Illinois. The application was 

submitted pursuant to the provisions of 

the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the 

regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR 

part 400). It was formally docketed on 

December 8, 2020. 

Subzone 22F currently consists of the 

following sites: Site 2 (480 acres)—One 

Abbott Park Road, North Chicago; Site 3 

(129 acres)—Atkinson Road, North 

Chicago; Site 4 (42 acres) 22nd Street, 

North Chicago; Site 5 (17 acres)—1300 

East Touhy, Des Plaines; and, Site 7 (1.4 

acres)—1800 Brummel Avenue, Elk 

Grove Village. 

The proposed expansion would add 

an additional site to the subzone: 

Proposed Site 8 (5.64 acres)—1015 West 

Devon Avenue, Itasca, DuPage County. 

No authorization for expanded 

production activity has been requested 

at this time. The subzone will be subject 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES