### 41953 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 134 / Friday, July 12, 2013 / Notices

Internet server ( http://www.usitc.gov ). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  The Commission instituted this investigation on October 16, 2012, based on a complaint filed on September 10, 2012, on behalf of South Alabama Medical Science Foundation of Mobile, Alabama (‘‘SASF’’); Merck & Cie of Altdorf, Switzerland (‘‘Merck’’); and Pamlab LLC of Covington, Louisiana (‘‘Pamlab’’). 77 FR 63336 (October 16, 2012). The complaint alleged violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 37, 39, 40, 47, 66, 67, 73, 76, 78–81, 83, 84, 86–89, 91, 92, 94–97, 99, 100, 110, 111, 113, 117, and 121 of U.S. Patent No. 5,997,915; claims 22, 26, and 32–38 of U.S. Patent No. 6,673,381; claims 1, 4–6, and 15 of U.S. Patent No. 7,172,778; and claims 1–3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11– 15, and 19–22 of U.S. Patent No. 6,011,040. The Commission’s notice of investigation named as respondents Gnosis SpA of Desio, Italy; Gnosis Bioresearch SA of Sant’Antonino, Switzerland; Gnosis USA Inc. of Doylestown, Pennsylvania; and Macoven Pharmaceuticals LLC of Magnolia, Texas.

On December 13, 2012, the Commission issued notice of its determination not to review an ID adding Viva Pharmaceuticals LLC as a new respondent. On February 4, 2013, the Commission issued notice of its determination not to review an ID to identify the new respondent as Viva Pharmaceuticals Inc. rather than Viva Pharmaceuticals LLC.

On May 10, 2013, complainants SASF, Merck, and Pamlab filed an unopposed corrected motion for leave to add Nestle Health Science-Pamlab Inc. (‘‘NHS-Pamlab’’) as a complainant and change Pamlab’s name to Camline LLC. On June 11, 2013, the administrative law judge issued an ID (Order No. 12) granting the motion. The administrative law judge found good cause shown because NHS-Pamlab has acquired Pamlab and Pamlab was renamed following the acquisition. There were no petitions for review.

Having considered the ID and the relevant portions of the record, the Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The complaint and notice of investigation are therefore amended to add a new complainant NHS-Pamlab and to rename Pamlab as Camline LLC.

This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and of section 210.42(h) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42(h)).

By order of the Commission. Issued: July 8, 2013. Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013–16707 Filed 7–11–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 7020–02–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE**

**Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree under the Clean Air**  **Act**

On June 28, 2013, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed consent decree with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee in the lawsuit entitled United States and State of Tennessee v. King Pharmaceuticals LLC, Civil Action No.
2:13-cv-00178.

The United States filed this lawsuit under the Clean Air Act. The complaint seeks injunctive relief and civil penalties for alleged violations at the defendant’s pharmaceutical production facility in Bristol, Tennessee, of (1) Permits issued under the Tennessee State Implementation Plan, (2) federal emission standards for hazardous air pollutants for pharmaceutical production, and (3) Title V of the Clean Air Act. The consent decree requires the defendant to perform injunctive relief to correct the violations at the facility and to pay $2.2 million in civil penalties, of which half will go to the United States and the other half to the State of Tennessee.

The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on the consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and should refer to United States et al. v. King Pharmaceuticals LLC, D.J. Ref. No. 90– 5–2–1–10132. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be submitted either by email or by mail:

To submit comments: Send them to:

By e-mail ...... pubcommentees.enrd@usdoj.gov. To submit comments: Send them to:

By mail ......... Assistant Attorney General U.S. DOJ—ENRD P.O. Box 7611 Washington, D.C. 20044–

7611.

During the public comment period, the consent decree may be examined and downloaded at this Justice Department Web site: http:// www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ Consent

_Decrees.html. We will provide a paper copy of the consent decree upon written request and payment of reproduction costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044–7611.

Please enclose a check or money order for $13.00 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury.

Maureen Katz, Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2013–16752 Filed 7–11–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4410–15–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF LABOR**

**Office of the Secretary**

**Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB**  **Review; Comment Request; Labor Organization and Auxiliary Reports** 

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  The Department of Labor (DOL) is submitting the Office of Labor Management Standards (OLMS) sponsored information collection request (ICR) revision titled, ‘‘Labor Organization and Auxiliary Reports,’’ to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval for use in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq. ).

**DATES :**  Submit comments on or before August 12, 2013.

**ADDRESSES :**  A copy of this ICR with applicable supporting documentation; including a description of the likely respondents, proposed frequency of response, and estimated total burden may be obtained free of charge from the RegInfo.gov Web site at http://www.reg info.gov/public/do/PRAViewICR?ref

_ nbr=201306-1245-001 (this link will only become active on the day following publication of this notice) or by contacting Michel Smyth by telephone


### 41954 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 134 / Friday, July 12, 2013 / Notices

at 202–693–4129 (this is not a toll-free number) or sending an email to DOL

_PRA

_PUBLIC@dol.gov. Submit comments about this request to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for DOL–OLMS, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503, Fax: 202–395–6881 (this is not a toll-free number), email: OIRA

_ submission@omb.eop.gov.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION :**  Contact Michel Smyth by telephone at 202–693– 4129 (this is not a toll-free number) or by email at DOL

_ PRA

_PUBLIC@dol.gov. Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3507(a)(1)(D).

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  The Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act requires a union to file an annual financial report and a copy of the union’s constitution and bylaws with the DOL. Under certain circumstances, reports are required of a union officer and employee, employer, labor relations consultant, and surety company. Any such report is available for public disclosure. A filer is required to retain supporting records for five years; a union is also required to retain election records for one year.

This ICR has been classified as a revision, because a LM–2 filer will no longer be required to obtain a digital signature from a third-party vendor. Furthermore, the DOL seeks to transfer the 2011 version of Form LM–30 from OMB Control Number 1245–0005 to Control Number 1245–0003. The DOL will discontinue the pre-2011 From LM–30 under 1205–0005, after the OMB approves the current request, consistent with regulations published on October 26, 2011 (76 FR 66442). For additional substantive information about this ICR, see the related notice published in the Federal Register on April 8, 2013 (78 FR 20948).

This information collection is subject to the PRA. A Federal agency generally cannot conduct or sponsor a collection of information, and the public is generally not required to respond to an information collection, unless it is approved by the OMB under the PRA and displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. In addition, notwithstanding any other provisions of law, no person shall generally be subject to penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information that does not display a valid Control Number. See 5 CFR 1320.5(a) and 1320.6. The DOL obtains OMB approval for the ongoing information collection under Control Number 1245–0003. The current approval is scheduled to expire on October 31, 2013; however, it should be noted that existing information collection requirements submitted to the OMB receive a month-to-month extension while they undergo review. New requirements would only take effect upon OMB approval.

Interested parties are encouraged to send comments to the OMB, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs at the address shown in the **ADDRESSES** section within 30 days of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. In order to help ensure appropriate consideration, comments should mention OMB Control Number 1245– 0003. The OMB is particularly interested in comments that:

• Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;

• Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;

• Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

• Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of

responses.

Agency: DOL–OLMS. Title of Collection: Labor Organization and Auxiliary Reports.

OMB Control Numbers: 1245–0003 and 1245–0005.

Affected Public: Private Sector—notfor-profit institutions.

Total Estimated Number of Respondents: 31,501.

Total Estimated Number of Responses: 31,501.

Total Estimated Annual Burden
Hours: 4,582,390.

Total Estimated Annual Other Costs Burden: $0.

Dated: July 1, 2013. Michel Smyth, Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–16736 Filed 7–11–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4510–CP–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR** 

**Employment and Training Administration** 

**TA–W–82,634, Prudential Global Business Technology Solutions**  **Central Security Services Dresher, Pennsylvania; TA–W–82,634A,**  **Prudential Global Business Technology Solutions Central Security**  **Services Iselin, New Jersey; TA–W– 82,634B, Prudential Global Business**  **Technology Solutions Central Security Services Plymouth, Minnesota; TA–W–**  **82,634C, Prudential Global Business Technology Solutions Central Security**  **Services Scottsdale, Arizona; TA–W– 82,634D, Prudential Global Business**  **Technology Solutions Central Security Services Roseland, New Jersey; TA–**  **W–82,634E, Prudential Global Business Technology Solutions**  **Central Security Services Jacksonville, Florida; TA–W–82,634F, Prudential**  **Global Business Technology Solutions Central Security Services New York,**  **New York; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for**  **Worker Adjustment Assistance**

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on June 10, 2013, applicable to workers of Prudential, Global Business Technology Solutions, Central Security Services, Dresher, Pennsylvania (TA–W–82,634), Iselin, New Jersey (TA–W–82,634A), Plymouth, Minnesota (TA–W–82,634B), Scottsdale, Arizona (TA–W–82,634C), Roseland, New Jersey (TA–W–82,634D) and Jacksonville, Florida (TA–W– 82,634E). The workers are engaged in activities related to the supply of infrastructure technology services that support Prudential’s supply of financial services. The notice will be published soon in the Federal Register

.

At the request of a petitioner, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. New information from the company shows that Ms. Lydia Svendsen, an employee of the Central Security Services department of Global Business Technology Solutions, was based out of the New York, New York location of Prudential.

The intent of the Department’s certification is to include all workers of the subject firm who were adversely affected by a shift in the supply of infrastructure technology services to Ireland.