alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE 1>

                                                            EXHIBIT 3


                      NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
                               AND SUBSIDIARIES
                      ----------------------------------
                     ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND BY-LAWS


     The following document of Navistar International Corporation is
incorporated herein by reference:


     3.1  Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Navistar International
          Corporation effective July 1, 1993, filed as Exhibit 3.2 to
          Form 10-K dated October 31, 1993, which was filed on January 27,
          1994, Commission File No. 1-9618.

     The following document of Navistar International Corporation is included
herein in those executed and conformed copies of this report to the Securities
and Exchange Commission, the New York Stock Exchange, the Chicago Stock
Exchange and the Pacific Stock Exchange.

     3.2  The By-Laws of Navistar International Corporation effective
          April 14, 1995, filed as Exhibit 3.2 on Annual Report on Form 10-K
          dated October 31, 1995, which was filed on January 26, 1996, on
          Commission File No. 1-9618.









































                                      E-1
Lessons Learned: Frequently Cited 

Standards Related to COVID-19 Inspections

In conducting COVID-19-related inspections, OSHA has frequently cited employers for violating 

certain standards. Employers can learn more about those frequently-cited standards and relevant 

resources in OSHA’s in-depth analysis of Common COVID-19 Citations. Employers must be 

vigilant to meet all OSHA requirements. The following are examples, to date, of requirements that 

employers have most frequently failed to follow:

 Provide a medical evaluation before a worker is fit-tested or uses a respirator.

 Perform an appropriate fit test for workers using tight fitting respirators. 

 Assess the workplace to determine if COVID-19 hazards are present, or likely to be present, 

which will require the use of a respirator and/or other personal protective equipment (PPE). 

 Establish, implement, and update a written respiratory protection program with required 

worksite-specific procedures. 

 Provide an appropriate respirator and/or other PPE to each employee when necessary to 

protect the health of the employees (ensuring the respirator and/or PPE used is the correct 

type and size). 

 Train workers to safely use respirators and/or other PPE in the workplace, and retrain 

workers about changes in the workplace that might make previous training obsolete. 

 Store respirators and other PPE properly in a way to protect them from damage, 

contamination, and, where applicable, deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve. 

 For any fatality that occurs within 30 days of a work-related incident, report the fatality to 

OSHA within eight hours of finding out about it.

 Keep required records of work-related fatalities, injuries, and illness.

Employers are also encouraged to learn more about OSHA’s On-Site Consultation Program, which 

offers no-cost and confidential occupational safety and health services to small- and medium-sized 

businesses.

This document does not have the force and effect of law and is not meant to bind the public in any way. This document is intended only to provide clarity to the public 

regarding existing requirements under the law or agency policies. It contains summaries of mandatory safety and health standards, and employers should consult the text of 

the applicable standard in determining their obligations. The Occupational Safety and Health Act requires employers to comply with safety and health standards and regulations 

promulgated by OSHA or by a state with an OSHA-approved state plan. In addition, the Act’s General Duty Clause, Section 5(a)(1), requires employers to provide their 

employees with a workplace free from recognized hazards likely to cause death or serious physical harm.

DOL-OSHA-OOC-2020-108 November 2020

1-800-321-OSHA (6742) | TTY 1-877-889-5627) | www.osha.gov
EXHIBIT 23.1





                            CONSENT OF LEGAL COUNSEL





         We hereby consent to the use, in the Prospectus as outlined in
Securities and Exchange Commission Form S-8, of our name as special counsel to
General Communication, Inc. in the preparation of the Prospectus and the
rendering of certain opinions including an opinion as to the legality of the
shares.


                                   WOHLFORTH, VASSAR, JOHNSON
                                   AND BRECHT,
                                   A Professional Corporation


                                   /s/


Anchorage, Alaska

June 24, 2003
MPD

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0340

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MATTHEW SEVERSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, and

good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including September 25, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 9 2023

08/09/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0340
### §20166. Emergency escape breathing apparatus

Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008, the Secretary of Transportation shall prescribe regulations that require railroad carriers—

(1) to provide emergency escape breathing apparatus suitable to provide head and neck coverage with respiratory protection for all crewmembers in locomotive cabs on freight trains carrying hazardous materials that would pose an inhalation hazard in the event of release;

(2) to provide convenient storage in each freight train locomotive to enable crewmembers to access such apparatus quickly;

(3) to maintain such equipment in proper working condition; and

(4) to provide their crewmembers with appropriate training for using the breathing apparatus.

(Added Pub. L. 110–432, div. A, title IV, §413(a), Oct. 16, 2008, 122 Stat. 4889.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of enactment of the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008, referred to in text, is the date of enactment of div. A. of Pub. L. 110–432, which was approved Oct. 16, 2008.
### SUBCHAPTER V—INTERNAL DEVELOPMENT
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WAS HI NGTON, D.C. 20460

Mr. Lee B. Zc ugin Hunton & Williams LLP 1900 K Street, N.W. Wash inglon , D.C. 20006-1109 Dear Mr. Zeugin : 

# MAY 18 

# 2011 OFFICE OF AIR AND RAOIATION

Thank you for your letter of May 6, 201 1, to Administrator Jackson regarding the 

### Utility Air Regulatory Group's identification of discrepancies in the way historical mercury emissions data were recalculated 

### and used in establishing the mercury maximum achievable control technology (MACT) floor in the proposed Mercury and Air Toxies Standards (MATS) rule. We have revised these mercury calculations and will include them in the docket this week to ensure that this information is publicly avai lable

. We do not expect this change to have any appreciable impact on the controls that will be needed for compliance or on the anal y ses underlying the proposal. We recognize that your primary concern involves the mercury limit for existing coal power plants. The revised calculation s result in a sli ght increase of that limit, from 1.0 to 1 .2 pounds per trillion British thermal units. We estimate that this change wi ll lessen our expected mercury reductions by about half of a ton , not changing our projected 90 percent reduction from the mercury in the coal used by power plants

. We remain committed to following the law and s ound science and providing , in a timely way, the public health protections required by the Clean Air Act. Toxic air pollutants like mercury from coal

- and oil

fired power plants have been shown to cause neurological damage, including lower IQ, in children expo sed in the womb and during early development. The proposed standards , as you are aware, also address emissions of other toxic metals linked with cancer, such as arsenic, chromium, and nickel. Mercury and many of the other toxic pollutants also damage the environment and pollute our nation ' s lakes , streams , and fish. In addition , cutting 

### these toxic pollutants also reduces fine particle pollution, which causes premature death, heart disease , and workdays losl to illness and asthma. Your letter also noted other possible discrepancies regarding aspects of OUf calculations. As we move forward to develop the final ru le, I can assure you that we will fully consider these and any other comments you provide during the comment period. As usual , we will continue to update the docket as comments come in.

Imernet Address (URl) • hUpJ/Www

. epa .gov R KycllKllRKyc l llble • Printed with Vegelable Oil Based Inks on tOO"/o Postconsumer , Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper

### If you have further question s regarding thi s proposed rule , p lease contact Bill Maxwell ofmy staff at (9 19) 54 1-5430. Sincerely,

G na McCarthy Assistant Administrator
Draft Proposal CB-36 

This concept has been developed by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) as a possible code

change proposal to the Commercial provisions of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code

(IECC).   Interested parties are asked to submit any and all comments on DOE's initial concepts and draft

code change proposals. For instructions on submitting comments, visit:

www.energycodes.gov/development/commercial/codes/iecc/concepts/

Lighting Controls in Sleeping Units (CB-36) 

Objective:  Simplify the exception to the interior lighting power in sleeping units.

Suggested Code Change Proposal

Revise Exception 1.2 to Section C405.5.1 as follows:

Exceptions: 

 1.2 Lighting in sleeping units lighting in hotels, motels, boarding houses or similar buildings. 

(Remainder of the exception remains unchanged.)

Reason:  The definition of sleeping unit is such that there is no further need to delineate the building

type where the unit is located.  In fact, the delineation suggests there are others that are not “similar” to

hotels, motels, and boarding houses where the exception would not apply (e.g., dormitories).

Cost Impact:   There is no cost impact associated with this proposed change.
§ 203.50 Who may apply for end-of-life royalty relief? You may apply for royalty relief in two situations. ( a ) Your end-of-life lease (as defined in § 203.2) is an oil and gas lease and has average daily production of at least 100 barrels of oil equivalent (BOE) per month (as calculated in § 203.73) in at least 12 of the past 15 months. The most recent of these 12 months are considered the qualifying months. These 12 months should reflect the basic operation you intend to use until your resources are depleted. If you changed your operation significantly (e.g., begin re-injecting rather than recovering gas) during the qualifying months, or if you do so while we are processing your application, we may defer action on your application until you revise it to show the new circumstances.
( b ) Your end-of-life lease is other than an oil and gas lease (e.g., sulphur) and has production in at least 12 of the past 15 months. The most recent of these 12 months are considered the qualifying months.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondents, v. Leo Ratajczak, Appellant.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied. Reargument of motion to appeal on original papers, typewritten briefs, granted on court’s own motion, and upon reargument, motion granted and Robert F. Conway, Esq., of Buffalo, assigned as attorney to conduct appeal.
#### § 203.81 What supplemental reports do royalty-relief applications require?

(a) You must send us the supplemental reports, indicated in the following table by an X, that apply to your field. Sections 203.83 through 203.91 describe these reports in detail.

| Required reports | End-of-life lease | Deep water | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Expansion project | Pre-act lease | Development project |
| (1) Administrative information Report | X | X | X | X |
| (2) Net revenue & relief justification report | X | | | |
| (3) Economic viability & relief justification report (RSVP model inputs justified by other required reports) | | X | X | X |
| (4) G&G report | | X | X | X |
| (5) Engineering report | | X | X | X |
| (6) Production report | | X | X | X |
| (7) Deep water cost report | | X | X | X |
| (8) Fabricator's confirmation report | | X | X | X |
| (9) Post-production development report | | X | X | X |

(b) You must certify that all information in your application, fabricator's confirmation and post-production development reports is accurate, complete, and conforms to the most recent content and presentation guidelines available from the BSEE Regional office for your region.

(c) With your application and post-production development report, you must submit an additional report prepared by an independent CPA that:

(1) Assesses the accuracy of the historical financial information in your report; and

(2) Certifies that the content and presentation of the financial data and information conform to our most recent guidelines on royalty relief. This means the data and information must:

(i) Include only eligible costs that are incurred during the qualification months; and

(ii) Be shown in the proper format.

(d) You must identify the people in the CPA firm who prepared the reports referred to in [paragraph (c)](/on/2024-09-16/title-30/section-203.81#p-203.81(c)) of this section and make them available to us to respond to questions about the historical financial information. We may also further review your records to support this information.
➊ 洗手 ➋ 检查呼吸面罩

用肥皂与清水洗手,或使用酒精含量60%以上

的免水洗手液。

检查面罩是否有破损。若面罩破损或潮湿,请勿

使用。

➌ 戴上呼吸面罩

用手托着面罩,将鼻夹

置于指尖处,松紧带垂

在手部下方。

用面罩覆盖口鼻并确保

脸部与面罩间无任何缝

隙(如,胡须、头发以

及眼镜)。

将松紧带拉到头部

后‌方,固定在偏上

部‌分。若有第二条松紧

带,将底部的松紧带固

定到耳朵下方脖颈‌处。

请勿交叉松紧‌带。

若您的面罩带有金属鼻

夹,用双手指尖按压皮

鼻夹区域,使其贴合鼻

部。

➍ 调整呼吸面罩 ➎ 佩戴呼吸面罩

将双手置于面罩上。快

速吸气,然后呼气。若

感到鼻部有漏气,调整

鼻夹;若面罩边缘有漏

气,调整松紧带。

重复上述步骤直到面‌罩

完全贴合。若无法正确

贴合,请更换面罩。

避免在使用时触摸面

罩。若触摸了面罩,请

洗手。

➏ 取下呼吸面罩 ➐ 丢弃呼吸面罩

洗手。 从后部取下呼吸面罩。

请勿触摸面罩前部。

若无需因供给不足而重复使

用呼吸面罩,请将其弃置于

封闭的废物容器中。洗手。

正确佩戴呼吸面罩的七个步骤

遵循以下步骤正确佩戴与取下呼吸面罩,保护您和他人的安全。

1-800-321-OSHA (6742)

TTY 1-877-889-5627

www.osha.gov

更多信息,请观

看‌短视频“佩戴与

口罩”。

注意:若需重复使用

呼吸面罩,佩戴手套

来进行面罩检查与佩

戴。使用过程中避免

触摸面部(包括眼睛

与口鼻)。

OSHA 4031-06 2020 — Seven Steps to Correctly Wear a Respirator at Work (Chinese Traditional)

职业安全与健

康管理局
#### BERNSTEIN v. LESTER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 6, 1903.)

1. Fraud—Advance of Purchase Price—Sale of Goods to Third Person.

One who obtains money on a promise made with fraudulent intent, to deliver certain goods in his stock, and then sells his entire stock to another, is liable for the fraud.

3. Witness—Denial of Facts—Propriety of Further Questions.

Questions relating to matters the existence of which the witness denies, and proof of which is essential as a basis for further inquiry, are properly excluded.

*497Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District.

Action by Isaac Bernstein against Morris Lester. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and BISCHOFF and BLANCHARD, JJ.

Louis Levene, for appellant.

Marks & Marks, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The record supports a finding of fraud, the proof being that the defendant obtained money from the plaintiff’s assignor upon a promise to deliver certain goods forming part of his stock, and then sold his entire stock to somebody else, under circumstances leading to the inference that the promise itself was given with a fraudulent intent. There is no ground for the assumption that the justice when' rendering judgment for the plaintiff disregarded the allegation of fraud, and there appears to be no error in the rulings upon the evidence.

The questions excluded assumed facts not proven, or related to matters the existence of which the witness had denied, and proof of which was essential as a basis of further inquiry.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
### Part D—Savannah River Site, South Carolina

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 113–66, div. C, title XXXI, §3146(e)(16)(C), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 1078, redesignated part E as D.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior part D, consisting of sections 2621 to 2625, was redesignated part C of this subchapter by Pub. L. 113–66, div. C, title XXXI, §3146(e)(16)(C), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 1078.
## REPORT AMENDMENT NUMBER 1

Study 

# nue ACTIVATED SLUDGE RESPIRATION INHIBI T ION TEST (CARBON AND AMMONIUM OXIDATION) WITH EXP1313100

Sponsor

Test F a c ility 

### WIL Research E urope 

### B V . Hambakenweteri ng 7 5231 DO 's-Hertogenbosch The Netherlands Laboratory Project Identification Project 

### 505719 Substance 205622/A

- Page 1 of 3-EXP1313100 ProJ ect 505719 AMENDMENT DES C RIPTION CO N C E R NING Page 29 , Appendix 4 . Pa ragraph title : Certi ficate o f a nal ysis . REASON FOR AMENDMENT 

### A new certif icate of an al ysis was provided by 

### the s p onso r .
APPROVAL

This report am e ndm e nt has been a udited b y t he Quali ty A ssu ra n ce Uni t . Proj e ct 5057 1 9 Start End Type of I nspe ct i on Inspection Inspections Phase/Process date d ate 

### Study Report Amend m ent 

### 0 1 1 7- 0ct - 20 1 4 17-0ct-20 14 The review of the fina l report a men d ment was co mp l eted on t h e date of signing th is QA sta t ement Qualitv Assu rance

- P.age 2 of 3 - Report i ng 

### date 17· 0ct- 2 014

### EXP1313100 Project 505719 

### APPENDIX 4 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Fi nal Report -Page 29-
#### § 56.7056 Collaring in bootlegs.

Holes shall not be collared in bootlegs.

[56 FR 46508, Sept. 12, 1991]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsUnusual Oxidative Limitations for Al-MAX PhasesAlumina-forming MAX phases are well-known for their excellent oxidation resistance, rivaling many metallic NiAl, NiCrAl, and FeCrAl counterparts and with upper temperature capability possible to approximately1400C. However a number of limitations have been emerging that need to be acknowledged to permit robust performance in demanding applications. Ti2AlC and Ti3AlC2 possess excellent scale adhesion, cyclic oxidation/moisture/volatility resistance, and TBC compatibility. However they are very sensitive to Al content and flux in order to maintain an exclusive Al2O3 scale without runaway oxidation of ubiquitous TiO2 transient scales. Accelerated oxidation has been shown to occur for Al-depleted, damaged, or roughened surfaces at temperatures less than 1200C. Conversely, Cr2AlC is less sensitive to transients, but exhibits volatile losses at 1200C or above if common Cr7C3 impurity phases are present. Poor scale adhesion is exhibited after oxidation at 1150C or above, where spallation occurs at the Cr7C3 (depletion zone) interface. Delayed spallation is significant and suggests a moisture-induced phenomenon similar to non-adherent metallic systems. Re-oxidation of this surface does not reproduce the initial pure Al2O3 behavior, but initiates a less-protective scale. Cr2AlC has also been shown to have good long term bonding with superalloys at 800C, but exhibits significant Beta-NiAl + Cr7C3 diffusion zones at 1100C and above. This may set limits on Cr2AlC as a high temperature TBC bond coat on Ni-based superalloys, while improving corrosion resistance in lower temperature applications.Document ID20170001576Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsSmialek, James L.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredFebruary 15, 2017Publication DateFebruary 1, 2017Subject CategoryMetals And Metallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberGRC-E-DAA-TN37630E-19328NASA/TM-2017-219444Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 109492.02.03.02.02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Keywordsoxidation resistanceceramicsAvailable DownloadsNameType20170001576.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Dismissed and Opinion Filed July 30, 2015 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-15-00467-CV DAVA ALLEN, Appellant V. ALERN WANG, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-01177-D



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justi ce Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright The filing fee and docketing statement in this case are past due. By postcard dated April 13, 2015, we notified appellant the $195 filing fee was due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard April 13, 2015, we notifie d appellant the docketing statement had not been filed in this case. We directed appellant to file th e docketing statement within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so might result in dismi ssal of this appeal. Both notices were sent to the address provided by appellant on her notice of appeal , and both notices were returned as “insufficient address unable to forward.” To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, file d the docketing statement, updated her address, or otherwise corresponded with th e Court regarding the status of this appeal.–2– Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(b)(c).

150467F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
DAVA ALLEN, Appellant
No. 05-15-00467-CV V. ALERN WANG, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-01177-D. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee ALERN WA NG recover his costs of this appeal from appellant DAVA ALLEN.

Judgment entered July 30, 2015.
No. 07-13-00413-CR

James Henry Gibson From the 47th District Court

 Appellant of Randall County

v. August 25, 2014

The State of Texas Opinion by Justice Hancock

 Appellee

§

§

§

§

§

§

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated August 25, 2014, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

FILE COPY