alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTutorial for Collecting and Processing Images of Composite Structures to Determine the Fiber Volume FractionFiber-reinforced composite structures have become more common in aerospace components due to their light weight and structural efficiency. In general, the strength and stiffness of a composite structure are directly related to the fiber volume fraction, which is defined as the fraction of fiber volume to total volume of the composite. The most common method to measure the fiber volume fraction is acid digestion, which is a useful method when the total weight of the composite, the fiber weight, and the total weight can easily be obtained. However, acid digestion is a destructive test, so the material will no longer be available for additional characterization. Acid digestion can also be difficult to machine out specific components of a composite structure with complex geometries. These disadvantages of acid digestion led the author to develop a method to calculate the fiber volume fraction. The developed method uses optical microscopy to calculate the fiber area fraction based on images of the cross section of the composite. The fiber area fraction and fiber volume fraction are understood to be the same, based on the assumption that the shape and size of the fibers are consistent in the depth of the composite. This tutorial explains the developed method for optically determining fiber area fraction performed at NASA Langley Research Center.Document ID20170001570Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsConklin, Lindsey*(National Inst. of Aerospace Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredFebruary 14, 2017Publication DateJanuary 1, 2017Subject CategoryComposite MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA/CR-2017-219365NF1676L-24995Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 869021.04.07.01.13CONTRACT_GRANT: NNL09AA00ADistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20170001570.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-11-0000460

27-JUN-2013

08:25 AM
§ 285.900 Who must meet the decommissioning obligations in this subpart? ( a ) Lessees are jointly and severally responsible for meeting decommissioning obligations for facilities on their leases, including all obstructions, as the obligations accrue and until each obligation is met.
( b ) Grant holders are jointly and severally liable for meeting decommissioning obligations for facilities on their grant, including all obstructions, as the obligations accrue and until each obligation is met.
( c ) If a lessee or grant holder has installed a facility on a lease or grant that was authorized by an authority other than BOEM and that approving authority has imposed a decommissioning obligation, such obligation will substitute for the requirements of this subpart. The decommissioning requirements in this subpart will apply to such a facility if the authorizing agency has not imposed or enforced a decommissioning obligation.
[88 FR 6413, Jan. 31, 2023, as amended at 89 FR 42721, May 15, 2024]
§ 56.6309 Fuel oil requirements for ANFO. ( a ) Liquid hydrocarbon fuels with flash points lower than that of No. 2 diesel oil (125 °F) shall not be used to prepare ammonium nitrate-fuel oil, except that diesel fuels with flash points no lower than 100 °F may be used at ambient air temperatures below 45 °F.
( b ) Waste oil, including crankcase oil, shall not be used to prepare ammonium nitrate-fuel oil.
§ 1218.41 Assessments for failure to submit payment of same amount as Form ONRR-2014 or bill document or to provide adequate information. ( a ) The ONRR may assess an amount not to exceed $250 when the amount of a payment submitted by a reporter/payor for geothermal, solid minerals, and Indian oil and gas leases is not equivalent in amount to the total of individual line items on the associated Form ONRR-2014, Form ONRR-4430, or a bill document, unless ONRR has authorized the difference in amount.
( b ) The ONRR may assess an amount not to exceed $250 for each payment for geothermal, solid minerals, and Indian oil and gas leases submitted by a reporter/payor that cannot be automatically applied to the associated Form ONRR-2014, Form ONRR-4430, or a bill document because of inadequate or erroneous information submitted by the reporter/payor.
( c ) For purposes of this section, inadequate or erroneous information is defined as: ( 1 ) Absent or incorrect payor-assigned document number, required to be identified by the reporter/payor in Block 4 on Form ONRR-2014 (document 4 number), or the reuse of the same incorrect payor-assigned document 4 number in a subsequent reporting period.
( 2 ) Absent or incorrect bill document invoice number (to include the three-character alpha prefix and the nine-digit number) or the payor-assigned document 4 number required to be identified by the reporter/payor on the associated payment document, or the reuse of the same incorrect payor-assigned document 4 number in a subsequent reporting period.
( 3 ) Absent or incorrect name of the administering Bureau of Indian Affairs Agency/Area office; or the word “allotted” or the tribe name on payment documents remitted to ONRR for an Indian tribe or allottee. If the payment is made by EFT, the reporter/payor must identify the tribe/allottee on the EFT message by a pre-established five-digit code.
( 4 ) Absent or incorrect ONRR-assigned payor code on a payment document.
( 5 ) Absent or incorrect identification on a payment document.
( d ) For purposes of this section, the term “Form ONRR-2014” includes submission of reports of royalty information, such as Form ONRR-4430.
( e ) For purposes of this section, a bill document is defined as any invoice that ONRR has issued for assessments, late-payment interest charges, or other amount owed. A payment document is defined as a check or wire transfer message.
( f ) The amount of the assessment to be imposed pursuant to paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section shall be established periodically by ONRR. The assessment amount will be based on ONRR's experience with costs and improper reporting and/or payment as specified in this section. The ONRR will publish a Notice in the Federal Register of the assessment amount to be applied with the effective date.
[58 FR 45438, Aug. 30, 1993, as amended at 73 FR 15897, Mar. 26, 2008]
## IN THECOU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS N O . A P - 75, 967
G ER A LD M A R SH A LL , A ppe l l ant

v . THE S TA TE OF TE X AS ON DI RECT APPE AL FROM A M OTI ON TO REC USE F I LE D I N CAUS E N O. 9 4 8 5 9 1 I N T HE 1 8 0 DI S TR I CT COURT TH HA RRI S CO UNTY PerCuriam . O P I N IO N T h is is ad ire c t ap p e a l o f th e d e n ial o f

am o tio nto re c u se f

iledinth e 1 8 0 D istric t th C o u rto f H arr is C o un ty, C au s e N o . 9 4 8 5 9 1 , s tyle dT h e S ta te o f T e x a s v . G e ra ldM ars h a ll. A p p e lla n t’ s ap p e a l is u n tim e ly an dis , th e re f o re , d is m is s e d
. D o n ot publi sh D el i ver ed: O ct ober8, 2008
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 13, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 13, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18D0146. IN THE INTEREST OF A. C., A CHILD (MOTHER) .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2017JR001
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Horizon Lines Holding Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the period ending December 25, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, M. Mark Urbania, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ M. MARK URBANIA                                                                            
|M. Mark Urbania Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)

March 3, 2006
#### SIRE, Appellant, v. SHUBERT et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 20, 1903.)

Action by Henry S. Sire against Samuel S. Shubert and others.

F. Bien, for appellant.

W. Klein, for respondents.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
#### § 550.1452 What if I correct the violation?

The matter will be closed if you correct all of the violations identified in the Notice of Noncompliance within 20 days after you receive the Notice (or within a longer time period specified in the Notice).
### §910a. Authorization of loans, conveyances, etc., by government and municipalities

The government of Puerto Rico may assist slum clearance and urban redevelopment projects and urban renewal projects through cash donations, loans, conveyances of real and personal property, facilities, and services, and otherwise, and may authorize municipalities or other political subdivisions to make cash donations, loans, conveyances of real and personal property to public corporate authorities and to take other action, including but not limited to the making available or the furnishing of facilities and services, in aid of slum clearance and urban redevelopment projects and urban renewal projects.

(July 18, 1950, ch. 466, title I, §102, 64 Stat. 344; Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 783, title I, §107(3), 69 Stat. 637.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Puerto Rican Federal Relations Act which comprises this chapter.

Section 102 of act July 18, 1950, cited as a credit to this section, as applicable to Alaska and Hawaii, was classified to sections 480a and 721a of this title.

#### Amendments

1955—Act Aug. 11, 1955, included urban renewal projects.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Infusion Brands International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Action of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: August 21, 2012 | By: | /s/ Robert DeCecco III                               
|---------------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------------------
|                       |     | Robert DeCecco III                                   
|                       |     | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
### §53503. Establishing a capital construction fund

(a) In General.—A citizen of the United States owning or leasing an eligible vessel may make an agreement with the Secretary under this chapter to establish a capital construction fund for the vessel.

(b) Allowable Purpose.—The purpose of the agreement shall be to provide replacement vessels, additional vessels, or reconstructed vessels, built in the United States and documented under the laws of the United States, for operation in the foreign or domestic trade of the United States or in the fisheries of the United States.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1593; Pub. L. 110–140, title XI, §1122(b), Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1762; Pub. L. 117–263, div. C, title XXXV, §3545, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3100.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 53503(a) | 46 App.:1177(a) (1st sentence). | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title VI, §607(a) (1st sentence), (2d sentence related to purpose), 49 Stat. 2005; June 23, 1938, ch. 600, §§23–28, 52 Stat. 960; Aug. 4, 1939, ch. 417, §10, 53 Stat. 1185; July 17, 1952, ch. 939, §§17–19, 66 Stat. 764; Pub. L. 85–637, Aug. 14, 1958, 72 Stat. 216; Pub. L. 86–518, §1, June 12, 1960, 74 Stat. 216; Pub. L. 87–45, §6, May 27, 1961, 75 Stat. 91; Pub. L. 87–271, Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat. 570; restated Pub. L. 91–469, §21(a), Oct. 21, 1970, 84 Stat. 1026; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(97)(A), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 162. |
| 53503(b) | 46 App.:1177(a) (2d sentence related to purpose). | |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 117–263 substituted "foreign or domestic trade of the United States" for "United States foreign, Great Lakes, noncontiguous domestic, or short sea transportation trade".

2007—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 110–140 substituted "noncontiguous domestic, or short sea transportation trade" for "or noncontiguous domestic trade".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2007 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 110–140 effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1824 of Title 2, The Congress.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 31, 2014

p0127

Order 

Clerk

January 31, 2014

147013 & (25)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147013

COA: 312441

Kent CC: 93-064278-FC

GREGORY WINES,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 25, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the cases 

of People v Carp (Docket No. 146478), People v Eliason (Docket No. 147428), and 

People v Davis (Docket No. 146819) are pending on appeal before this Court and that the 

decisions in those cases may resolve an issue present in this case, we ORDER that the 

application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decisions in those cases. The motion for 

miscellaneous relief is DENIED as moot.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6430

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ALVIN ANDRAE DRUMMOND,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:17-cr-00517-HMH-1; 6:20-

cv-03125-HMH)

Submitted: April 25, 2023 Decided: April 27, 2023

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER, Circuit Judge, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alvin Andrae Drummond, Appellant Pro Se. Maxwell B. Cauthen, III, Assistant United 

States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6430 Doc: 7 Filed: 04/27/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Alvin Andrae Drummond seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115-17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,

484 (2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Drummond has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6430 Doc: 7 Filed: 04/27/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
§ 56.6204 Hoists. ( a ) Before explosive material is transported in hoist conveyances, the hoist operator shall be notified.
( b ) Explosive material transported in hoist conveyances shall be placed within a container which prevents shifting of the cargo that could cause detonation of the container by impact or by sparks. The manufacturer's container may be used if secured to a nonconductive pallet. When explosives are transported, they shall be secured so as not to contact any sparking material.
( c ) No explosive material shall be transported during a mantrip.
§ 23.9 Special requirements for complete devices. Telephones and signaling devices will be considered nonpermissible if used under any of the followings conditions: ( a ) Without the approval plate, mentioned hereafter.
( b ) With unprotected openings in any of the explosion-proof compartments. This condition refers to any openings in these compartments, but especially to those equipped with removable covers.
( c ) If not complete with all of the parts considered in the approval.
( d ) If installed or connected otherwise than in accordance with the instructions furnished by the manufacturer.
( e ) If modified in any manner not authorized by MSHA.
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

39 40 41



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 08/12 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 12 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
§ 550.1455 Does my request for a hearing on the record affect the penalties? ( a ) If you do not correct the violations identified in the Notice of Noncompliance, the penalties will continue to accrue even if you request a hearing on the record.
( b ) You may petition the Hearings Division (Departmental) of the Office of Hearings and Appeals, to stay the accrual of penalties pending the hearing on the record and a decision by the Administrative Law Judge under § 550.1472. ( 1 ) You must file your petition within 45 calendar days of receiving the Notice of Noncompliance.
( 2 ) To stay the accrual of penalties, you must post a bond or other surety instrument, or demonstrate financial solvency, using the standards and requirements as prescribed in §§ 550.1490 through 550.1497, for the principal amount of any unpaid amounts due that are the subject of the Notice of Noncompliance, including interest thereon, plus the amount of any penalties accrued before the date a stay becomes effective.
( 3 ) The Hearings Division will grant or deny the petition under 43 CFR 4.21(b).
### §2. Same; additional stars

On the admission of a new State into the Union one star shall be added to the union of the flag; and such addition shall take effect on the fourth day of July then next succeeding such admission.

(July 30, 1947, ch. 389, 61 Stat. 642.)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Louis J. Coppo, True Name Louis Joseph Coppo, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Queens County, rendered May 6, 1959, after trial .before the court without a jury, convicting him of contriving, drawing, and assisting in a lottery, and of conspiracy to commit the said crime, and sentencing him to serve a term of one to two years. The defendant waived a jury trial (N. Y. Const., art. I, § 2). Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tumbleweed Communications Corp. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James P. Scullion, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 10, 2007



|                                                       |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|/S/ JAMES P. SCULLION                                  |  | 
|James P. Scullion Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |  |
#### § 56.12041 Design of switches and starting boxes.

Switches and starting boxes shall be of safe design and capacity.