alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED : MA Y 10 , 201 1 U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C I NTH EMATTE RO F DIAMON D AI RCHARTER , INC . FA A DOCKE T NO . CP10EA000 4 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) FDM S NO . FAA-2010-062 0 • liTMEN TO F .SPORTAllOr- i 

### 8

NOTIC EO FPREHEARIN GCONFERENC E A Prehearin g Telephon e Conferenc e i s schedule do nJun e 1 , 2011 , at 3:0 0 p.m. , Eastern Time . Al l partie s shoul db e prepare dt o discus s al l issue s an dfact s at issue . Eac hparty shal l ensur e that

th e Judg e receives , n o late r tha nMay 20 , 2011 , acop y o f eac hdocumen t

tha t party ha s provide dt o th e othe r

party bu t no t th e Judge . Pursuan t t o Sectio n 55 6 o f

th e Administrativ e Procedur e Act , 5 U.S.C . § 556(c)(8) , eac h party shal l b e represente db y someon e wh o ha s authority t o negotiat e concernin g resolutio n o f al l issue s i ncontroversy . S O ORDERED .

" • Ronni e A . Yode r Chie f Administrativ e La w Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis t

### T

FA A Docke t

No . CP10EA000 4 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) REVISE D SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& 0I PCOP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC'43 0 ,, , ,

v Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2#1000 '



### ONECOP V Gregory S . Winton , Respondent' s Counse l Aviatio nLa w Expert s On e Researc hCourt , Suit e 45 0 Rockville , M D 2085 0 TEL : 301-294-855 0 FAX : 301-294-252 5 Zachary M . Berman , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counsel , EAL- 7 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 1 Aviatio nPlaz a Jamaica , N Y 1143 4 TEL : 718-553-325 8 FAX : 718-995-569 9 Th e Honorabl e Ronnie A . Yoder , Chie f Administrativ e Law Judg e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 , Roo mE l 2-32 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-214 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y e«pe(j|bB dcoiiuier , use th e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio nAdministration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbui^li'ilgh

t Buildin g - Suit e 2WI000 , Washington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430. - 2 -
§ 963.5 Definitions. The terms *HUD* and *Public housing agency (PHA)* are defined in 24 CFR part 5. *Act.* The U.S. Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437).
*Alternative procurement process.* The alternative method of public housing contract award available to public housing agencies and eligible resident-owned businesses under the conditions set forth in this part.
*Annual Contributions Contract (ACC).* See definition in 24 CFR 968.105.
*Certification.* A written assertion based on supporting evidence, which shall be kept available for inspection by the Secretary, the Inspector General, and the public, which assertion shall be deemed to be accurate for purposes of this part, unless the Secretary determines otherwise after inspecting the evidence and providing due notice and opportunity for comment.
Contract or public housing contract. Any contract awarded by a PHA for services, supplies, or construction necessary for the development, operation, modernization, or maintenance of public housing.
*Management officials.* The individuals who possess the power to make the day-to-day, as well as major, decisions on matters of management, policy, and operations of the resident-owned business.
*Principal.* An owner, partner, director, or management official of the resident-owned business with the power and authority to represent the business and to execute contract, leases, agreements, and other documents on behalf of the business.
Public housing or public housing development. Any public housing development which is owned by a Public Housing Agency (PHA) and is receiving funds under an Annual Contribution Contract (ACC).
*Public housing resident.* Any individual who resides in public housing as a signatory on a public housing lease, or as a member of the family of the individual(s) who is the signatory on the public housing lease.
*Resident-owned business.* Any business concern which is owned and controlled by public housing residents. (The term “resident-owned business” includes sole proprietorships.) For purposes of this part, “owned and controlled” means a business: ( 1 ) Which is at least 51 percent owned by one or more public housing residents; and
( 2 ) Whose management and daily business operations are controlled by one or more such individuals.
All securities which constitute ownership or control of a corporation for purposes of establishing the business as a resident-owned business shall be held directly by the public housing residents. No securities held in trust, or by any guardian for a minor, shall be considered as held by the public housing resident in determining the ownership or control of a corporation. [57 FR 20189, May 11, 1992, as amended at 61 FR 5215, Feb. 9, 1996]
March 12, 2015

Mr. Michael S. Bradshaw
ArrowData, LLC

777 North Rainbow Boulevard 380 Las Vegas, NV 89107

Dear Mr. Bradshaw:

This letter is to inform you that we are unabl e to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we cannot proce ss your request and what you s hould do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your January 8, 2015, exemption re quest of behalf of ArrowData, LLC into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0131), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or ar guments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any fu rther, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requi res you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days , we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additiona l time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Nia Daniels Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 239 (Friday, December 11, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 80094]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27445]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK


Sunshine Act Meetings; Notice of an Open Meeting of the Board of 
Directors of the Export-Import Bank of the United States

TIME AND DATE: Tuesday, December 22, 2020 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: The meeting will be held via teleconference.

STATUS: The meeting will be open to public observation for Item Number 
1 only.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Credit Risk Appetite--Linkage to the Budget 
Cost Level.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Joyce B. Stone (202-257-4086). 
Members of the public who wish to attend the meeting via audio only 
teleconference should register via https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/7315218396872121868 by noon Monday, December 21, 2020. 
Individuals will be directed to a Webinar registration page and 
provided call-in information.

Joyce B. Stone,
Assistant Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-27445 Filed 12-9-20; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
§ 550.182 When may the Secretary cancel a lease at the exploration stage? BOEM may not approve an exploration plan (EP) under 30 CFR part 550, subpart B, if the Regional Supervisor determines that the proposed activities may cause serious harm or damage to life (including fish and other aquatic life), property, any mineral deposits, the National security or defense, or to the marine, coastal, or human environment, and that the proposed activity cannot be modified to avoid the condition(s). The Secretary may cancel the lease if: ( a ) The primary lease term has not expired (or if the lease term has been extended) and exploration has been prohibited for 5 years following the disapproval; or
( b ) You request cancellation at an earlier time.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe SSME seal test program:  Leakage tests for helically-grooved sealsHelically grooved annular seal configurations were tested in highly turbulent flow to determine if reduced leakage and enhanced stability would result from the pumping action of the seal. It was found that: (1) leakage of a helically grooved seals decreases with running speed; (2) leakage reduction due to increased running speed is greater at lower values of R sub a; (3) an asymptote for leakage reduction is indicated with increasing running speed; (4) leakage is reduced by reducing the ridge (minimum) and average clearances; (5) leakage increases with increasing pitch angles and with increasing groove depth. Plain seals with smooth rotors and stators will leak more than a helically grooved seal. It was also found that plain seals with a rough rotor and a rough stator leak less than a properly designed helically grooved seal. A properly designed helically grooved seal consumes at least twice as much power as a conventional annular seal.Document ID19840004427Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsChilds, D. W.*(Texas A&M Univ. College Station, TX, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1983Subject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-170921SEAL-3-83NAS 1.26:170921Accession Number84N12495Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-33716Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840004427.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 56.7008 Moving the drill.

When a drill is being moved from one drilling area to another, drill steel, tools, and other equipment shall be secured and the mast placed in a safe position.
### §80114. Lost, stolen, and destroyed negotiable bills

(a) Delivery on Court Order and Surety Bond.—If a negotiable bill of lading is lost, stolen, or destroyed, a court of competent jurisdiction may order the common carrier to deliver the goods if the person claiming the goods gives a surety bond, in an amount approved by the court, to indemnify the carrier or a person injured by delivery against liability under the outstanding original bill. The court also may order payment of reasonable costs and attorney's fees to the carrier. A voluntary surety bond, without court order, is binding on the parties to the bond.

(b) Liability to Holder.—Delivery of goods under a court order under subsection (a) of this section does not relieve a common carrier from liability to a person to whom the negotiable bill has been or is negotiated for value without notice of the court proceeding or of the delivery of the goods.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1352.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 80114(a) | 49 App.:94 (1st par.). | Aug. 29, 1916, ch. 415, §14, 39 Stat. 540. |
| 80114(b) | 49 App.:94 (last par.). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the word "If" is substituted for "Where" for clarity. The words "upon satisfactory proof of such loss, theft, or destruction" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "if the person claiming the goods gives a surety bond" are substituted for "and upon the giving of a bond, with sufficient surety" to clarify the condition precedent to court approval of delivery. The words "in an amount" are added for clarity. The word "indemnify" is substituted for "protect" because it is more accurate. The words "against liability under the outstanding original bill" are substituted for "from any liability or loss incurred by reason of the original bill remaining outstanding" for clarity. The words "surety bond" are substituted for "indemnifying bond" for consistency in this section.
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1731 Who is responsible for decommissioning an OCS facility subject to an Alternate Use RUE? ( a ) The holder of an Alternate Use RUE issued under 30 CFR part 585 is responsible for all decommissioning obligations that accrue following the issuance of the Alternate Use RUE and which pertain to the Alternate Use RUE. See 30 CFR part 585, subpart J, for additional information concerning the decommissioning responsibilities of an Alternate Use RUE grant holder.
( b ) The lessee under the lease originally issued under 30 CFR part 556 will remain responsible for decommissioning obligations that accrued before issuance of the Alternate Use RUE, as well as for decommissioning obligations that accrue following issuance of the Alternate Use RUE to the extent associated with continued activities authorized under this part.
( c ) If a lease issued under 30 CFR part 556 is cancelled or otherwise terminated under any provision of this subchapter, the lessee, upon our approval, may defer removal of any OCS facility within the lease area that is subject to an Alternate Use RUE. If we elect to grant such a deferral, the lessee remains responsible for removing the facility upon termination of the Alternate Use RUE and will be required to retain sufficient bonding or other financial assurances to ensure that the structure is removed or otherwise decommissioned in accordance with the provisions of this subpart.
### §46308. Interference with air navigation

A person shall be fined under title 18, imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both, if the person—

(1) with intent to interfere with air navigation in the United States, exhibits in the United States a light or signal at a place or in a way likely to be mistaken for a true light or signal established under this part or for a true light or signal used at an air navigation facility;

(2) after a warning from the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, continues to maintain a misleading light or signal; or

(3) knowingly interferes with the operation of a true light or signal.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1238.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 46308 | 49 App.:1472(c). | Aug. 23, 1958, Pub. L. 85–726, §902(c), 72 Stat. 784. |
| | 49 App.:1655(c)(1). | Oct. 15, 1966, Pub. L. 89–670, §6(c)(1), 80 Stat. 938; Jan. 12, 1983, Pub. L. 97–449, §7(b), 96 Stat. 2444. |

Section

In this section, before clause (1), the words "fined under title 18" are substituted for "a fine of not exceeding $5,000" for consistency with title 18. The words "such fine and imprisonment" are omitted as surplus. In clause (1), the words "used at" are substituted for "in connection with" for clarity. The words "airport or other" are omitted as being included in the definition of "air navigation facility" in section 40102(a) of the revised title. In clause (2), the word "due" is omitted as surplus. The word "Administrator" in section 902(c) of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (Public Law 85–726, 72 Stat. 784) is retained on authority of 49:106(g). In clause (3), the words "removes, extinguishes, or" are omitted as surplus.
§ 402.13 Program management. ( a ) After the conclusion of negotiations, the USGS will transmit a grant or contract-award document, as appropriate, setting forth the terms of the award.
( b ) *Grants.* Recipients will be required to execute funded projects in accordance with OMB Circulars governing cost principles, administrative requirements, and audit, as applicable to their organization type. In addition, OMB Circular A-67, Coordination of Federal Activities in the Acquisition of Certain Water Data, is applicable to awards under these programs.
( c ) *Contracts.* Administrative requirements for performance of research contracts will be established in the contract clauses in conformance with applicable procurement regulations and other interior or USGS acquisition policy documents. OMB Circular A-67 will also apply to some contract awards under this program.
§ 556.716 What must I do with respect to the designation of operator on a lease when a transfer of record title is submitted? ( a ) If a transfer of ownership of the record title interest only changes the percentage ownership of the record title, no new parties or new aliquots are involved in the transaction, and no change of designated operator is made, you will not need to submit a new designation of operator form.
( b ) In all cases other than that in paragraph (a) of this section, you must submit new designation of operator forms in accordance with § 550.143 of this chapter. In the event that you are transferring multiple record title interests, you must comply with this requirement for each interest that does not fall within paragraph (a) of this section.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2084

GEORGE GREGORY JACKSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COMPUTER PROFESSIONALS, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-96-114-R)

Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 30, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Gregory Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Roger Louis Williams,

WILLIAMS, BUTLER & PIERCE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary

judgment to the Defendant on his action alleging breach of an

employment contract. Our review of the record and the district

court's opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jackson v. Computer

Professionals, Inc., No. CA-96-114-R (E.D. Va. June 27, 1996). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Joseph O. Klein et al., Appellants, v. Russell W. Dieter, Defendant, and Leo F. Gaudy, Respondent.

Motion to vacate order of dismissal pursuant to rule X of the Appellate Division Fourth Department Rules denied.
§ 401.19 Reporting procedures. ( a ) The institutes are encouraged to publish, as technical reports or in the professional literature, the findings, results, and conclusions relating to separately identifiable research projects undertaken pursuant to the Act.
( b ) Each institute shall submit to the granting agency, by a date to be specified in the award document, an annual program report which provides: ( 1 ) A statement concerning the relationship of the institute's program to the water problems and issues of the State;
( 2 ) A synopsis of the objectives, methods, and conclusions of each project completed within the period covered;
( 3 ) A progress report on each project continuing into the subsequent fiscal year;
( 4 ) Citations of all reports, papers, publications or other communicable products resulting from each project completed or in progress;
( 5 ) A description of all activities undertaken for the purpose of promoting the application of research results;
( 6 ) A description of cooperative arrangements with other educational institutions, State agencies, and others.
( c ) One manuscript of reproducible quality and two copies of the annual program report shall be furnished to the granting agency. One copy of a complete report on the objectives, methods, and conclusions of each research project shall be maintained by the institute and open to inspection.
( d ) Appropriate acknowledgment shall be given by institutes to the granting agency's participation in financing activities carried out under provisions of the Act. Such acknowledgment shall be included in all reports, publications, news releases, and other information media developed by institutes and others to publicize, describe, or report upon accomplishments and activities of the program.
( e ) An original and two copies of the final “Financial Status Report,” SF 269, shall be furnished to the granting agency within 90 days of completion of the grant period.
### §§73, 73a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 73 and 73a, relating to Territory of Alaska, were omitted in view of admission of Alaska into the Union.

Section 73, acts Aug. 24, 1912, ch. 387, §5, 37 Stat. 513; Mar. 3, 1927, ch. 363, §1, 44 Stat. 1392; Mar. 26, 1934, ch. 86, §1, 48 Stat. 465, specified time of election of members of the legislature.

Section 73a, act Mar. 26, 1934, ch. 86, §4, 48 Stat. 466, empowered legislature to change date of elections.