P. 1



# OAR Box 1103
Prepped by RyanDugan



### Document

Number: 

# 119 ) IV-D-2

5

Docket Number: 

# A-83-4 1

Printed 4/11/2008 1:50:52 PM

Sheet 119 of 174P. 2

•_••, . 0_.*-_9./95 15:3 6 EPf l REGIONA L COUNSE L ATLANTA,Gfl .

...t o »'« * * *

_____ * 

## X w 

## < * UNITE D STATCf c ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y REGIO N _ 4 9 COUBT I AMI S I V ft*l f-CET

. N.E
. ATLANTA
. OCOROl i * v30S0 3

Feb

. 21 , 199 5
MEMORANDU M SUBJECT : P

R12/23/94 , j"Federa l Exposur e o f

th e Genera l PuJbliC n

Radiatio nProtectio nGuidanc e fo r

FROM :

TO : Pau l Wagner , jChief ,

Offic e o f Radiatio

n AllanRichardson , Deput y Criteri a & Standard s Divisio n Director

, ORIA , 6602 J

23 , w e hav e reviewe

d th e December Federa l Radiatio

nprotectio

nGuiaaind

e Public . Our offic e appreciate s rece ver y important fo

r th e wit hyouana other s in report s befor e Lhe

y are inF

R specifi c comments : regiona l ORIA H Q in Th e , 199 4 Notic e onth e ne w tor BxpbBur e o f the Genera l ivin g severa l copies . I t i s

_atio noffic e t o be involve d evaluating ! an

dreviewin

g thes e followin

g are m y genera l an

d radiatio

n

an d exposure s

referenc e A s statedi nth

e "Summar

y i s emphasize

d t o ensure Although , T , a s heialt hphysic s t o thi s principle, ! inEPA' s regulations , suc

hla s th e curren

t Sit e Cleanu

p Standards" , avoided . Inother ! words , th e specificall y

bein g tol dthat plac e i nORTA' s regulations , Protectio

nGuidanc e i t i s no t encourage

dan demphasized . ORIA t o th e other part s shoul d thi s notice . Hither eliminat e include i t incurren t rulemakinj g above . O np.66415 , 2n

d column , th

e doesn' t includ

e glioba l fallout , column , iBt sentence , I t does , t o muc hinth

e overal l backgroun d significant at area s aroun dnuqlear Nevada Tes t Site . O np.66415 , to

p of 3r d column , exposur e i nflight , are airlin e considered genera l public ? 

## SSL' §r£b

: ~ /

throughout th

e notice , ALAR

A are wel l belo

w th e RPG . professiona l kno

w an d adher e radiatio

nprotectio

n rulemakin

g fo r "Radiatio

n t o ALAR A i s specificall y regiona l radiatio

noffice s ar e ALAR A principl e ha s no yet here inthi s Federa l referre dto , i t i s fro m one par t o f b e deal t wit hstartin g wit h reference s t o ALAR A o r s suc ha s th e 19 6 mentioned th e an d only Consistenc

y

definitio

n Of natura l backgroun d wherea s o

np.66427 , 3r

d Althoug hthi s doesn' t amount o f 30 0 mrem/yr , i t i s weapo nsite s lik

e th e
i nreferenc e t o radiatio n piloca , attendants , etc . ourvcyo , studies , Healt h Re c en t

PrlntwS on ftoeyclea PaperP. 3

i
. 01/19/9 5 15:3 6 EPf l REGIONA L COUNSE L ATLANTA,GA . 

### 00 3

Physic s Journals , hav e show n ove r l rem/yr , yet j the y haven- ' t worker s du e t o the ' natura l thei r radiationexposure s a t beendefine da s radiatio n o f th e radiation . sour; e O np.66417 , bottom ; o f 2ndcolum h "preponderanc e o f scientists" , i s best , an d EP A

shoul dus e it . wha t group s o r individual s woul d doub t DOE , DDD , o r NR C woiil d th e Healt hPhysics ; Society , a s Elec t an d forme r directo r o f ORfC A Healt hPhysic s chapter s an d linea r mode l no longe r ha s su * organization s an d fellow federa l Ignored . Pleas e indicat e whic h suppor t th e linea r model .
inVo l untary Onp.66422 , bottom o f 2n d colutn

p othe r risks , voluntar y o r justificatio nfo r any particula ^ risk" . We woul dlik e t o not e t rulemaking s suc ha s th e NESHA P o nth e philosophy tha t radiatioj n facilitie s i s a ninvoluntar y dos e limit 8 tha t Resulte d (1 0 say s tha t becaus e a :hin k tha t th e linea r mode l Bette r suppor t fo r exactl y thi s i s neede dhere . I believ e this , a s wel l a s evidence d b y

th e President wh o i s visitin g al l loca l evidenc e tha t th e Thes e peopl e an d agencie s shoul d no t b e scientist s o r group s wh o bel i sv e

pr o aiding ppar t

say s tha t "existenc e o f

i s no t a incrementa l radiatio n la t som e o f ORIA' s Radionuclides , rel y heavil y exposur e from

nuclea r thu s justifyin g th e low em/yr ) . ris k rrtr i O np.66423 , bottOn i o f 2n d columj n I mentione dearlier . Thi s contradict s th e curren t no rulemaking . O np.66424 , bottom o f 1s t fo r man-mad e radionuclides . Radium o r alpha-emitter s limit e discussio n -ALARA . agai nemphasize s ALARA , a s

i n"Recommendatio n4 " polic y o f th e 19 6
colunjn , refer s to 4 0 CF R14 1 onl y

i s ther e n o mentio no f (141.15) ? 

### Wh y

Concernin g th e "Reques t fo r Coameats " question s
Fo r #1 , 10 0 mre m

i s federa l agencies ' consieten t regulation s
Fo r #5 , I don' t kno w th e weightin g factor s ma y allowe dunde r th e ol d iodine s t o thyroid , factor s vs . uncertaint y studie dfurther . Fo r #7 , unti l al l agencie s change , th e ol dunit s shoul d consistenc y

bu t becaus e th e usuall y

forge t tha t healt h othe r radiationworker s air e wit hICR P an d othe r an dorders . Specifics , bu t th e us e o f highe r orga ndose s no t orga nlimits , e.g . io nfo r weightin g ari dunderestimatio nshoul d b e allow cri t ica l Cons

_dera t

an dstat e regulation s remain , fo r no t onl y regulator s an dprofessor s physic s technician s an d use d t o an d familia r wit hP. 4 ai'19.'9 5 15:3 7 EP A REGIONA L COUNSE L ATLANTA,GA . __- .



### 3 Chang i i

g th e curren t units , confusio nan

d ma y compromis e exposure . Remembe r no t read s healt hphysic s journj a unit s shoul d h e include d i i evsryon e the m wil l caus e massiv e safet y and unwarrante d ha s a master s an d Is . Nonetheless , th e S i parentheses . Fo r #8 , ecologica l risk s an d dos e limit s shoul d b e addresse d and no t ignored . Superfund i s certainl y no t ignorin g Lhem . The y ar c currentl y

addressin g ecologica l risk s fo r chemicals , etc. , and ar e continuall y

askin g fo r radiatio necologica l assessment s an d acceptabl e dos e levels . Usin g curren t ecologica l report s and limit s fro m iDC E Order s an d NCR P guidanc e i s no t enough . J t onl y target s aquati c organism s ( 1 rad/day) . An d doesn' t hav e muc htechnica l support . Perhap s a lis t o f adequat e reference s o f ecologica l studie s involvin g radionuclide s woul d help . W e appreciat e th e opportunit y t o recomrnendatione . Shoul d yo u o r contac t Jo nRichard s a t #404/34 7 continen t o nthes e propose d other s hav e an

y questions , pleas e 3595,ax_.69Rfl .