alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fact Sheet

U.S. Department of Labor 

Employee Benefits Security Administration 

March 2010 

Changes to HIPAA Special Enrollment Provisions under the Children’s 

Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act 

Under the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA), group health 

plans and group health insurance issuers must offer new special enrollment opportunities. Effective 

April 1, 2009, plans and issuers must permit employees and dependents who are eligible for, but not 

enrolled in, a group health plan to enroll in the plan upon – 

 losing eligibility for coverage under a State Medicaid or CHIP program, or 

 becoming eligible for State premium assistance under Medicaid or CHIP. 

The employee or dependent must request coverage within 60 days of being terminated from Medicaid or 

CHIP coverage or within 60 days of being determined to be eligible for premium assistance. 

There are also new notice and disclosure requirements associated with CHIPRA. 

Model Notice for Employers 

Employers that maintain a group health plan in a State that provides premium assistance under Medicaid 

or CHIP must notify all employees of potential opportunities for premium assistance in the State in 

which the employee resides. On February 4, 2010, the Department of Labor published a notice in the 

Federal Register announcing the availability of a model notice and providing guidance on how to 

comply. Employers are required to provide this notice by the date that is the later of: 

 the first day of the first plan year after February 4, 2010, or 

 May 1, 2010. 

The model Employer CHIP Notice and the Federal Register notice are available on the EBSA website 

(http://www.dol.gov/ebsa). 

Model Disclosure Form for Plan Administrators 

In order for States to evaluate an employment-based plan to determine whether premium reimbursement 

is a cost effective way to provide medical or child health assistance to an individual, plans are required 

to provide, upon request, information about their benefits to State Medicaid or CHIP programs. The 

Departments, in conjunction with an advisory committee, will develop a model disclosure form by 

August 4, 2010. States may begin requesting this information from plans beginning with the first plan 

year after the model disclosure form is issued (January 1, 2011 for calendar year plans). 

Individuals need to contact their State’s Medicaid or CHIP program to determine if they are eligible for 

Medicaid or CHIP, and to see if their State will subsidize group health plan premiums. If they are 

eligible for a premium subsidy, they need to contact their plan administrator or employer to take 

advantage of the new special enrollment opportunity and enroll in the group health plan. 

Individuals needing assistance or with questions about the application of these provisions to their 

employment-based group health plan can call toll free 1-866-444-3272 (EBSA) to speak to a Benefits 

Advisor.
#### In the Matter of Robert I. Reed, Appellant, v Dale Artus, as Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[835 NYS2d 472]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered July 5, 2006 in Clinton County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Following a disturbance involving other inmates in the mess hall, a correction officer ordered petitioner to stop talking and to face the wall. He refused and used profane language toward the officer. As a result, he was charged in a misbehavior report *1057with refusing a direct order, creating a disturbance, engaging in verbal harassment and interfering with an employee. He was found guilty of the charges following a tier II disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding, which was eventually dismissed by Supreme Court. He now appeals.

Petitioner’s sole contention is that he was denied a videotape of the incident which allegedly would have exonerated him from any wrongdoing. The record discloses that the Hearing Officer was attentive to petitioner’s request and adjourned the hearing to ascertain whether there was a videotape depicting petitioner’s exchange with the officer in question. When the hearing was reconvened, the Hearing Officer advised petitioner that there was not, and petitioner accepted this explanation without raising a further objection. Consequently, he has failed to preserve his claim for our review *(see e.g. Matter of Dotson v Coughlin,*191 AD2d 912, 913 [1993], *lv denied*82 NY2d 651 [1993]), and this Court £‘ha[s] no discretionary authority or interest of justice jurisdiction” to review unpreserved issues in such special proceedings *(Matter of Khan v New York State Dept. of Health,*96 NY2d 879, 880 [2001]; *see Matter of Featherstone v Franco,*95 NY2d 550, 554 [2000]; *Matter of Hamilton v Goord,*32 AD3d 642 [2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 715 [2006]).

Cardona, PJ., Peters, Spain, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
#### § 57.12085 Transformer stations.

Transformer stations shall be enclosed to prevent persons from unintentionally or inadvertently contacting energized parts.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6357

KERRY GARNER, Petitioner - Appellant,
versus CALVIN ANTHONY, Warden of Lee Correctional Institution; CHARLES CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofSouth Carolina, at Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (CA02-1330-25-BC-3) Submitted: July 7, 2003 Decided: July 24, 2003 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kerry Garner, Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Kerry Garner seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2254 petition solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Garner has not made the requisite showing. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 560.102 What definitions apply to this part? § 560.102 What definitions apply to this part? ( a ) Terms used in this part have the meaning given in the Act and as defined in this part.
( b ) The following definitions apply to this part:
*Area or region* means the geographic area or region over which the BOEM authorized officer has jurisdiction, unless the context in which those words are used indicates that a different meaning is intended.
*BOEM* means Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.
*Designated official* means a representative of DOI subject to the direction and supervisory authority of the Directors, BOEM, and the appropriate Regional Manager of the BOEM authorized and empowered to supervise and direct all oil and gas operations and to perform other duties prescribed in this chapter.
*Director* means Director, BOEM, DOI.
*DOI* means the Department of the Interior, including the Secretary of the Interior, or his or her delegate.
*Federal lease* means an agreement which, for consideration, including, but not limited to, bonuses, rents or royalties conferred, and covenants to be observed, authorizes a person to explore for, or develop, or produce (or to do any or all of these) oil and gas, coal, oil shale, tar sands, and geothermal resources on lands or interests in lands under Federal jurisdiction.
*Gas or Natural Gas* means a mixture of hydrocarbons and varying quantities of non-hydrocarbons that exist in the gaseous phase.
*Oil* means a mixture of hydrocarbons that exists in a liquid or gaseous phase in an underground reservoir and which remains or becomes liquid at atmospheric pressure after passing through surface separating facilities, including condensate recovered by means other than a manufacturing process.
*Outer Continental Shelf* (OCS) means all submerged lands lying seaward and outside of the area of lands beneath navigable waters as defined in the Submerged Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1301-1315) and of which the subsoil and seabed appertain to the United States and are subject to its jurisdiction and control.
*OCSLA* means the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, as amended (Act of August 7, 1953, Ch. 345, 67 Stat. 462, 43 U.S.C. 1331-1356a, as amended by Pub. L. 95-372, 92 Stat. 629).
*Person* means a natural person, where so designated, or an entity, such as a partnership, association, State, political subdivision of a State or territory, or a private, public, or municipal corporation.
*We* means the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM).
*You* means the lessee or operating rights owner.
[81 FR 18175, Mar. 30, 2016]
Worker Exposure Risk to COVID-19

Classifying Worker Exposure to SARS-CoV-2

Worker risk of occupational exposure to SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, during an 

outbreak may depend in part on the industry type and need for contact within 6 feet of people 

known to have, or suspected of having, COVID-19. 

OSHA has divided job tasks into four risk exposure levels, as shown below. Most American workers 

will likely fall in the lower exposure risk (caution) or medium exposure risk levels.

Occupational Risk Pyramid for COVID-19

VERY HIGH EXPOSURE RISK 

Jobs with a high potential for exposure to known or suspected 

sources of COVID-19 during specific medical, postmortem, or 

laboratory procedures. Workers include:

• Healthcare and morgue workers performing aerosol-generating 

procedures on or collecting/handling specimens from 

potentially infectious patients or bodies of people known to 

have, or suspected of having, COVID-19 at the time of death. 

HIGH EXPOSURE RISK

Jobs with a high potential for exposure to known or suspected 

sources of COVID-19. Workers in this category include:

• Healthcare delivery, healthcare support, medical transport, and mortuary workers exposed to 

known or suspected COVID-19 patients or bodies of people known to have, or suspected of having, 

COVID-19 at the time of death. 

MEDIUM EXPOSURE RISK

Jobs that require frequent/close contact with people who may be infected, but who are not known 

or suspected patients. Workers in this category include:

• Those who may have contact with the general public (e.g., schools, high-population-density work 

environments, some high-volume retail settings), including individuals returning from locations 

with widespread COVID-19 transmission.

LOWER EXPOSURE RISK (CAUTION)

Jobs that do not require contact with people known to be, or suspected of being, infected. 

• Workers in this category have minimal occupational contact with the public and other coworkers.

For more information, see the Guidance on Preparing Workplaces for COVID-19.

 • osha.gov/covid-19 • 1-800-321-OSHA (6742) • @OSHA_DOL

The four exposure risk levels represent 

probable distribution of risk.

OSHA 3993-03 2020
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 956 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 956

To prohibit oil and gas exploration, development, and production in the 
      North Atlantic Planning Area of the Outer Continental Shelf.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 2023

   Mr. Smith of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit oil and gas exploration, development, and production in the 
      North Atlantic Planning Area of the Outer Continental Shelf.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Drilling in the North Atlantic 
Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION, DEVELOPMENT, AND 
              PRODUCTION IN THE NORTH ATLANTIC PLANNING AREA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 8 of the Outer Continental 
Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337), the Secretary of the Interior may not 
lease any area in the North Atlantic Planning Area of the Outer 
Continental Shelf for oil and gas exploration, development, or 
production.
    (b) No Effect on Existing Leases.--Subsection (a) shall not affect 
any oil and gas leases issued before the date of enactment of this 
section.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
31.1
  Certification
of Chief Executive Officer
 Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 I, Bruce J. Wood, certify
that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q of Schiff Nutrition International, Inc.;
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 
 4.  The registrant's other certifying
officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
  (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;
 
 (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 
 (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in
the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting; and
 
 5.  The registrant's other certifying
officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
 
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 
 (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
 Date:October 8,
    2008
              By:
              /s/
      Bruce J. WoodBruce J.
    WoodChief Executive
      Officer
### §§1231 to 1238. Repealed. Pub. L. 85–861, §36A, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1569

Section 1231, act Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1257, title III, §308, 68 Stat. 1155, provided for promotion to first lieutenant. See section 14301 et seq. of Title 10, Armed Forces.

Section 1232, act Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1257, title III, §309, 68 Stat. 1156, provided for promotion to captain, major, and lieutenant colonel to fill vacancies. See section 14301 et seq. of Title 10.

Section 1233, act Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1257, title III, §310, 68 Stat. 1156, related to promotion to captain, major, and lieutenant colonel regardless of vacancies. See sections 12009 and 14301 et seq. of Title 10.

Section 1234, act Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1257, title III, §311, 68 Stat. 1157, related to second consideration for promotion. See section 14301 et seq. of Title 10.

Section 1235, act Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1257, title III, §312, 68 Stat. 1157, related to promotion to colonel and female field grades to fill vacancies. See section 14301 et seq. of Title 10.

Section 1236, act Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1257, title III, §313, 68 Stat. 1157, provided for promotion to brigadier general and major general to fill vacancies. See section 14301 et seq. of Title 10.

Section 1237, acts Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1257, title III, §314, 68 Stat. 1158; June 30, 1955, ch. 247, §8, 69 Stat. 222, related to method of selection and order of promotion. See section 14301 et seq. of Title 10.

Section 1238, act Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1257, title III, §315, 68 Stat. 1158, related to total years of service for first nonunit promotion.
#### § 56.6500 Damaged initiating material.

A visual check of the completed circuit shall be made to ensure that the components are properly aligned and connected. Safety fuse, igniter cord, detonating cord, shock or gas tubing, and similar material which is kinked, bent sharply, or damaged shall not be used.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9545 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9545

     To provide for the electronic submission of domestic violence 
  information and communications with visa applicants, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 11, 2024

 Ms. Salazar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To provide for the electronic submission of domestic violence 
  information and communications with visa applicants, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Visa Processing Improvement and 
Paperwork Reduction Act''.

SEC. 2. ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INFORMATION.

     Section 833(a)(5)(A) of the Violence Against Women and Department 
of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005 (8 U.S.C. 1375a(a)(5)(A)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(vi) Subject to such regulations as the 
                        Secretary of State may prescribe, mailings 
                        under this subsection may be transmitted by 
                        electronic means.''.

SEC. 3. ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION WITH VISA APPLICANTS.

    Section 222 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1202) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, any 
requirement under this Act to communicate with visa applicant by 
standard mail shall be satisfied if an electronic communication is sent 
to the applicant at an electronic mail address provided by the 
applicant in connection with the pending application.''.
                                 <all>
```
### §3. Use of flag for advertising purposes; mutilation of flag

Any person who, within the District of Columbia, in any manner, for exhibition or display, shall place or cause to be placed any word, figure, mark, picture, design, drawing, or any advertisement of any nature upon any flag, standard, colors, or ensign of the United States of America; or shall expose or cause to be exposed to public view any such flag, standard, colors, or ensign upon which shall have been printed, painted, or otherwise placed, or to which shall be attached, appended, affixed, or annexed any word, figure, mark, picture, design, or drawing, or any advertisement of any nature; or who, within the District of Columbia, shall manufacture, sell, expose for sale, or to public view, or give away or have in possession for sale, or to be given away or for use for any purpose, any article or substance being an article of merchandise, or a receptacle for merchandise or article or thing for carrying or transporting merchandise, upon which shall have been printed, painted, attached, or otherwise placed a representation of any such flag, standard, colors, or ensign, to advertise, call attention to, decorate, mark, or distinguish the article or substance on which so placed shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by a fine not exceeding $100 or by imprisonment for not more than thirty days, or both, in the discretion of the court. The words "flag, standard, colors, or ensign", as used herein, shall include any flag, standard, colors, ensign, or any picture or representation of either, or of any part or parts of either, made of any substance or represented on any substance, of any size evidently purporting to be either of said flag, standard, colors, or ensign of the United States of America or a picture or a representation of either, upon which shall be shown the colors, the stars and the stripes, in any number of either thereof, or of any part or parts of either, by which the average person seeing the same without deliberation may believe the same to represent the flag, colors, standard, or ensign of the United States of America.

(July 30, 1947, ch. 389, 61 Stat. 642; Pub. L. 90–381, §3, July 5, 1968, 82 Stat. 291.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1968—Pub. L. 90–381 struck out "; or who, within the District of Columbia, shall publicly mutilate, deface, defile or defy, trample upon, or cast contempt, either by word or act, upon any such flag, standard, colors, or ensign," after "substance on which so placed".