alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §47525. Decision about airport noise and access restrictions on certain stage 2 aircraft

The Secretary of Transportation shall conduct a study and decide on the application of section 47524(a)–(d) of this title to airport noise and access restrictions on the operation of stage 2 aircraft with a maximum weight of not more than 75,000 pounds. In making the decision, the Secretary shall consider—

(1) noise levels produced by those aircraft relative to other aircraft;

(2) the benefits to general aviation and the need for efficiency in the national air transportation system;

(3) the differences in the nature of operations at airports and the areas immediately surrounding the airports;

(4) international standards and agreements on aircraft noise; and

(5) other factors the Secretary considers necessary.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1291.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 47525 | 49 App.:2154. | Nov. 5, 1990, Pub. L. 101–508, §9305, 104 Stat. 1388–382. |

Section

In this section, before clause (1), the words "conduct a study and decide on" are substituted for "determine by a study" for clarity. The words "with a maximum weight of not more than" are substituted for "weighing less than" for consistency with sections 47528 and 47529 of the revised title.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9484 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make certain improvements relating 

to the eligibility of veterans to receive reimbursement for emergency 

treatment furnished through the Veterans Community Care program, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 6, 2024 

Mrs. RODGERS of Washington (for herself, Mr. BERGMAN, and Mr. PAPPAS) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make certain 

improvements relating to the eligibility of veterans to 

receive reimbursement for emergency treatment furnished 

through the Veterans Community Care program, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Removing Extraneous 

5 Loopholes Insuring Every Veteran Emergency Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘RELIEVE Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9484 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR REIMBURSE2 MENT FOR EMERGENCY TREATMENT FUR3 NISHED TO VETERANS. 

4 (a) ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS.—Section 

5 1725(b)(2)(B) of title 38, United States Code, is amended 

6 by inserting ‘‘, unless such emergency treatment was fur7 nished during the 60-day period following the date on 

8 which the veteran enrolled in the health care system speci9 fied in subparagraph (A), in which case no requirement 

10 for prior receipt of care shall apply’’ before the period. 

11 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub12 section (a) shall apply with respect to emergency treat13 ment furnished on or after the date that is one year after 

14 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### § 56.9104 Railroad crossings.

Designated railroad crossings shall be posted with warning signs or signals, or shall be guarded when trains are passing. These crossings shall also be planked or filled between the rails.
#### The Carbic Manufacturing Company, appellee, v. The Osgood Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 28,367.

Suit by employee to recover money paid by him as office rent. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. F. J. Campbell, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed October 2, 1923.

Harry J. Myerson and Don C. Wray, for appellant; John H. Bart-ram, of counsel. Cattell & Waldron, for appellee; Ralph E. Brown, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §47303. Training foreign citizens

Subject to the concurrence of the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Transportation or Commerce, as appropriate, may train a foreign citizen in a subject related to aeronautics and essential to the orderly and safe operation of civil aircraft. The training may be provided—

(1) directly by the appropriate Secretary or jointly with another department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States Government;

(2) through a public or private agency of the United States (including a State or municipal educational institution); or

(3) through an international organization.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1281.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 47303 | 49 App.:1153. | June 16, 1948, ch. 473, §4, 62 Stat. 451. |
| | 49 App.:1655(c)(1). | Oct. 15, 1966, Pub. L. 89–670, §6(c)(1), 80 Stat. 938; Jan. 12, 1983, Pub. L. 97–449, §7(b), 96 Stat. 2444. |

Section

In this section, before clause (1), the title "Secretary of Commerce" is substituted for "Chief of the Weather Bureau" in section 4 of the International Aviation Facilities Act (ch. 473, 62 Stat. 451) because of sections 1 and 2 of Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1965 (eff. July 13, 1965, 79 Stat. 1318). The words "within or outside the United States" are omitted as surplus. The word "citizen" is substituted for "nationals" as being more appropriate. In clause (1), the word "jointly" is substituted for "or in conjunction" to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States Government" are substituted for "United States Government agency" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.
#### In the Matter of Beverly Rodes, Respondent, v. Oscar Rodes, Appellant.

Motion by appellant *pro se:*(1) for leave to appeal from an order *792of the Family Court, Queens County, dated August 14, 1963,. which denied his application for visitation of his children; (2) to dispense with printing on the appeal and to prosecute it on the original papers and typewritten brief; and (3) to direct the Family Court to furnish him, without costs to him, a transcript of the minutes. Motion denied, with leave to renew on proof of service of the motion papers and of the notice of appeal upon the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York. It appears from the motion papers submitted that neither such papers nor the notice of appeal was served on the. Corporation Counsel, although the notice of appeal was served upon the Family Court and upon the respondent (appellant’s wife or former wife). The statute requires service of the notice of appeal upon the Corporation Counsel (Family Court Act, § 1015). Under the circumstances the petitioner may apply to the Family Court or to this court, on notice to respondent and to the Corporation Counsel, for leave to cure his omission and to extend his time to serve the notice of appeal upon the Corporation Counsel (CPLR, § 5520). Attention is directed to the fact that on appeals from orders of the Family Court, neither a printed record nor a printed brief is required (Family Court Act, § 1016); and that upon such appeals the rules of this court now provide that the ‘‘ parties may file six clearly legible typewritten copies of their briefs ” and serve one such copy 11 upon each of the other parties to the appeal” (Rules of App. Div., 2d Dept., rule IV, subd. 1, par. [D], M. Y. L. J., Sept. 10,1963, p. 8). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Tomas Rios, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Permission to prosecute appeal as poor person granted. Appeal may be perfected upon one typewritten copy of the record and five typewritten copies of the brief. Present—Coon, J. P., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### §§ 250.1705-250.1707 [Reserved]
#### Catherine A. Stupnicki et al., Respondents, v. Southern New York Fish *&*Game Association, Inc., Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, without costs, on the opinion of Bookstein, J. (41 Mise 2d 266). Gibson, Herlihy and Taylor, JJ., concur; Coon, J. P., not voting.
Exhibit 32.2

CFOs Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of BancFirst Corporation (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Joe T. Shockley, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Joe T. Shockley, Jr.                            
|Joe T. Shockley, Jr.                                
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)                       
|March 15, 2011
#### In the Matter of Siegfried Mayer, an Alleged Incompetent Person. Florence M. Lowenstein et al., Appellants; Samuel E. Lepler, as Special Guardian, et al., Respondents.

Order, entered on August 23, 1963, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, by deleting from ordering paragraphs 6 (a) and 6 (b) the sums of $3,000 and $1,000, respectively, and substituting in lieu thereof the sums of $1,000 and $300, respectively, and, as so modified, the order is affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellants payable out of the incompetent’s estate. The estate aggregated $169,032.61, the bulk of which was in the stock of a close corporation. There were no complications and the incompetent’s lawyer for about 20 years handled the proceedings. He asked for and received a fee of $1,750. The special guardian rendered routine services in this uncomplicated and uncontested incompetency proceeding. Though services on 15 different days are claimed, there is no information concerning time spent. Therefore, reduction from $3,000 to $1,000 is warranted (see *Matter of Burh,*6 A D 2d 429). Similarly, the routine duties performed by the Commissioner in preparing for and conducting the two-hour hearing warrant a fee of $300, instead of the $1,000 awarded by Special Term. While the size of the incompetent’s estate is relevant, it is because most often it should serve as a limiting factor on fees allowed rather than as a justification for expansion. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Bergan, JJ,
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**







The
      following certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238.
      These certifications shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be incorporated
      by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933,
      as
      amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
      incorporation language in such filing.








**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      the undersigned officer of Schiff Nutrition International, Inc., a Delaware
      corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:




(i)  the
      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
      November 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as amended; and




(ii)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
                January 12, 2007
            By:
            */s/ Bruce J. Wood*Bruce
                J. WoodChief
                Executive Officer





A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to Schiff Nutrition International, Inc. and will be retained by Schiff
      Nutrition International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.








**Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      the undersigned officer of Schiff Nutrition International, Inc. a Delaware,
      corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:





(iii)  the
      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
      November 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as amended; and





(iv)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
                January 12, 2007
            By:
            */s/
                Joseph W. Baty*Joseph
                W. BatyChief
                Financial Officer





A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to Schiff Nutrition International, Inc. and will be retained by Schiff
      Nutrition International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 57.11056 Emergency hoists.

The procedure for inspection, testing and maintenance required by standard 57.19120 shall be utilized at least every 30 days for hoists designated as emergency hoists in any evacuation plan.
§ 9.155 Housing adjustments. ( a ) The agency shall modify its housing policies and practices as they relate to PDP housing facilities to ensure that these policies and practices do not discriminate, on the basis of disability, against a qualified individual with disabilities. The agency may not impose upon individuals with disabilities other policies, such as the prohibition of assistive devices, auxiliary aids, alarms, or guides in housing facilities, that have the effect of limiting the participation of tenants with disabilities in any agency conducted housing program or activity in violation of this part. Housing policies that the agency can demonstrate are essential to the housing program or activity will not be regarded as discriminatory within the meaning of this section if modifications would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of the program or activity or undue financial and administrative burdens.
( b ) The decision that compliance would result in such alteration or burdens must be made by the Secretary or his or her designee after considering all agency resources available for use in the funding and operation of the conducted program or activity, and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action required to comply with this section would result in such an alteration or such burdens, the agency shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with disabilities receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.
### [§48112. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title I, §115, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3201]

Section, added Pub. L. 106–181, title I, §107(a), Apr. 5, 2000, 114 Stat. 73, related to adjustment to AIP program funding.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<CIK> 0001022657
<NAME> AETNA INDUSTRIES, INC.
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1998
<CASH>                                             264
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,360
<ALLOWANCES>                                       372
<INVENTORY>                                     26,871
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,309
<PP&E>                                          96,152
<DEPRECIATION>                                  42,958
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 159,617
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,547
<BONDS>                                         85,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,362)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   159,617
<SALES>                                         53,085
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,085
<CGS>                                           44,974
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,974
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,486
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,866
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    759
<INCOME-TAX>                                       235
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                524
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       524
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Mary M. Zaharko, Appellant, v. Stephen P. Kennedy, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, Respondent.

Order entered on or about June 7, 1960, denying petitioner’s application to rescind the action of the Police Commissioner of the City of New York disapproving petitioner’s application for full pay while on sick leave, and dismissing the petition, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur—Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.
### **CHAPTER 26—GIFTS FOR DEFENSE PURPOSES**
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1721 If I temporarily abandon a well that I plan to re-enter, what must I do? You may temporarily abandon a well when it is necessary for proper development and production of a lease. To temporarily abandon a well, you must do all of the following: ( a ) Submit form BSEE-0124, Application for Permit to Modify, and the applicable information required by § 250.1712 to the appropriate District Manager and receive approval;
( b ) Adhere to the plugging and testing requirements for permanently plugged wells listed in the table in § 250.1715, except for § 250.1715(a)(8). You do not need to sever the casings, remove the wellhead, or clear the site;
( c ) Set a bridge plug or a cement plug at least 100-feet long at the base of the deepest casing string, unless the casing string has been cemented and has not been drilled out. If a cement plug is set, it is not necessary for the cement plug to extend below the casing shoe into the open hole;
( d ) Set a retrievable or a permanent-type bridge plug or a cement plug at least 100 feet long in the inner-most casing. The top of the bridge plug or cement plug must be no more than 1,000 feet below the mud line. BSEE may consider approving alternate requirements for subsea wells case-by-case;
( e ) Identify and report subsea wellheads, casing stubs, or other obstructions that extend above the mud line according to U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) requirements;
( f ) Except in water depths greater than 300 feet, protect subsea wellheads, casing stubs, mud line suspensions, or other obstructions remaining above the seafloor by using one of the following methods, as approved by the District Manager or Regional Supervisor: ( 1 ) A caisson designed according to 30 CFR 250, subpart I, and equipped with aids to navigation;
( 2 ) A jacket designed according to 30 CFR 250, subpart I, and equipped with aids to navigation; or
( 3 ) A subsea protective device that meets the requirements in § 250.1722.
( g ) Submit certification by a Registered Professional Engineer of the well abandonment design and procedures and that all plugs meet the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section. In addition to the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section, the Registered Professional Engineer must also certify the design will include two independent barriers, one of which must be a mechanical barrier, in the center wellbore as described in § 250.420(b)(3). The Registered Professional Engineer must be registered in a State of the United States and have sufficient expertise and experience to perform the certification. You must submit this certification with your APM (Form BSEE-0124) required by § 250.1712 of this part.
[76 FR 64462, Oct. 18, 2011, as amended at 77 FR 50900, Aug. 22, 2012; 81 FR 26038, Apr. 29, 2016]
§ 19.3 Application procedures and requirements. ( a ) Before MSHA will undertake the active investigation leading to approval of any lamp, the applicant shall make application by letter for an investigation leading to approval of the lamp. This application shall be sent to: U.S. Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration, Approval and Certification Center, 765 Technology Drive, Triadelphia, WV 26059, together with the required drawings, one complete lamp, and instructions for its operation. Fees calculated in accordance with part 5 of this title shall be submitted in accordance with § 5.40.
( b ) Where the applicant for approval has used an independent laboratory under part 6 of this chapter to perform, in whole or in part, the necessary testing and evaluation for approval under this part, the applicant must provide to MSHA as part of the approval application: ( 1 ) Written evidence of the laboratory's independence and current recognition by a laboratory accrediting organization;
( 2 ) Complete technical explanation of how the product complies with each requirement in the applicable MSHA product approval requirements;
( 3 ) Identification of components or features of the product that are critical to the safety of the product; and
( 4 ) All documentation, including drawings and specifications, as submitted to the independent laboratory by the applicant and as required by this part.
( c ) An applicant may request testing and evaluation to non-MSHA product safety standards which have been determined by MSHA to be equivalent, under § 6.20 of this chapter, to MSHA's product approval requirements under this part.
[68 FR 36419, June 17, 2003, as amended at 70 FR 46342, Aug. 9, 2005; 73 FR 52211, Sept. 9, 2008]