alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document

Exhibit 10.1

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO COOPERATION AGREEMENT
This Amendment No. 1 to the Cooperation Agreement (this “Amendment”), dated as of November 21, 2022, is by and among Azurite Management LLC, an Ohio limited liability company (together with the members of its investment “group” for purposes of Schedule 13D filed with the SEC executing this Agreement on the signature pages hereto, “Azurite”), and Invacare Corporation, an Ohio corporation (the “Company”), with respect to the matters set forth below. Each of the Company and Azurite is referred to as a “Party” and jointly are referred to as the “Parties”. For the purposes of this Amendment, (i) terms used with initial capital letters and not otherwise defined herein will have the meanings assigned to them in the Cooperation Agreement, and (ii) references to sections in this Amendment refer to such sections of the Cooperation Agreement.
WHEREAS, the Parties are party to that certain Cooperation Agreement, dated August 22, 2022 (the “Cooperation Agreement”).
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Cooperation Agreement pursuant to and in accordance with Section 15 of the Cooperation Agreement, as set forth herein. 
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of and reliance upon the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Azurite and the Company agree as follows: 
1.Amendment. The Cooperation Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
a.Section 1(j)(ii) is hereby amended by replacing the text “3,946,558” therein, in all instances in which such text appears, with the following text: “3,600,000”.
b.Section 2(c)(i) is hereby amended by replacing the text “19.9% of the then-outstanding Common Shares" therein with the following text: “9.995% of the total voting power represented by all shares of capital stock of the Company”.
2.Binding Effect.  Except to the extent expressly provided herein, the Cooperation Agreement will remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.
3.Miscellaneous.  Sections 12 through 16 of the Cooperation Agreement are incorporated herein by reference on a mutatis mutandis basis and, to the extent applicable, will govern the terms of this Amendment.
 [Signature Page Follows]


    









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed and delivered by the duly authorized signatories of the Parties as of the date hereof.
Azurite
									
		AZURITE MANAGEMENT LLC
		By:	/s/ Steven H. Rosen
			Name: Steven H. Rosen
			Title: Manager
			
		STEVEN H. ROSEN
		By:	/s/ Steven H. Rosen
			
		CRAWFORD UNITED CORPORATION
		By:	/s/ Brian E. Powers
			Name: Brian E. Powers
			Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
			
		EDWARD F. CRAWFORD
		By:	/s/ Brian E. Powers
			Name: Brian E. Powers
			Title: Attorney-in-fact
			
		MATTHEW V. CRAWFORD
		By:	/s/ Brian E. Powers
			Name: Brian E. Powers
			Title: Attorney-in-fact






    








Invacare
									
		INVACARE CORPORATION
		By:	/s/ Geoffrey Porter Purtill
			Name: Geoffrey Porter Purtill
			Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
Order entered November 6 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 13 - 00261 - CR No. 05 - 13 - 00262 - CR No. 05 - 13 - 00263 - CR No. 05 - 13 - 002 6 4 - CR MARQUIS OBRIAN WHITE , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F12 - 56960 - U , F13 - 57100 - U, F12 - 71366 - U, F13 - 71367 - U 

### O RDER The Court REINSTATE S the appeals. On August 26, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’ s brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to pursue the appeals; (2) appellant is indigent and represented by court

- appointed counsel J. Daniel Oliphant; and (3) Mr. Oliphant’s explanation for the delay in filing appel lant’s brief is his workload. We note that appellant’s brief was originally due July 19, 2013 and the appeal has been abated for more than two months awaiting findings on why appellant’s brief has not been filed.Accordingly, we DO NOT ADOPT the finding t hat appellant requires an additional seventy

days from October 29, 2013 to file appellant’s brief. We ORDER appellant to file his brief by DECEMBER 13, 2013 . No further extensions will be granted. If appellant’s brief is not filed by the date specified, the Court will order J. Daniel Oliphant removed as appellant’s attorney and will order the trial court to appoint new counsel to represent appellant in this case. We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Honorabl e Jennifer Balido, Presiding Judge, 291st Judicial District Court; to J. Daniel Oliphant; and to the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
### §5908. Relationship to other laws

Nothing in this chapter affects—

(1) chapter 51 (relating to transportation of hazardous material) or the regulations promulgated under that chapter; or

(2) any State highway weight or size law or regulation applicable to tractor-trailer combinations.

(Added Pub. L. 104–291, title II, §209(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3458.)
#### § 550.201 What plans and information must I submit before I conduct any activities on my lease or unit?

(a) *Plans and documents.* Before you conduct the activities on your lease or unit listed in the following table, you must submit, and BOEM must approve, the listed plans and documents. Your plans and documents may cover one or more leases or units.

| You must submit a(n) . . . | Before you . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (1) Exploration Plan (EP), | Conduct any exploration activities on a lease or unit. |
| (2) Development and Production Plan (DPP), | Conduct any development and production activities on a lease or unit in any OCS area other than the Western Gulf of Mexico. |
| (3) Development Operations Coordination Document (DOCD), | Conduct any development and production activities on a lease or unit in the Western GOM. |
| (4) BSEE approved Deepwater Operations Plan (DWOP), | Conduct post-drilling installation activities in any water depth associated with a development project that will involve the use of a non-conventional production or completion technology. |
| (5) Conservation Information Document (CID), | Commence production from development projects in water depths greater than 1,312 feet (400 meters). |
| (6) EP, DPP, or DOCD, | Conduct geological or geophysical (G&G) exploration or a development G&G activity (see definitions under § 550.105) on your lease or unit when: |
| | (i) It will result in a physical penetration of the seabed greater than 500 feet (152 meters); |
| | (ii) It will involve the use of explosives; |
| | (iii) The Regional Director determines that it might have a significant adverse effect on the human, marine, or coastal environment; or |
| | (iv) The Regional Supervisor, after reviewing a notice under § 550.209, determines that an EP, DPP, or DOCD is necessary. |

(b) *Submitting additional information.* On a case-by-case basis, the Regional Supervisor may require you to submit additional information if the Regional Supervisor determines that it is necessary to evaluate your proposed plan or document.

(c) *Limiting information.* The Regional Director may limit the amount of information or analyses that you otherwise must provide in your proposed plan or document under this subpart when:

(1) Sufficient applicable information or analysis is readily available to BOEM;

(2) Other coastal or marine resources are not present or affected;

(3) Other factors such as technological advances affect information needs; or

(4) Information is not necessary or required for a State to determine consistency with their CZMA Plan.

(d) *Referencing.* In preparing your proposed plan or document, you may reference information and data discussed in other plans or documents you previously submitted or that are otherwise readily available to BOEM.
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive
        - The United States Government Manual

#  The United States Government Manual 

**Collected by:** Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive 

**Archived since:**Aug, 2015

**Description:**
The United States Government Manual is the official handbook of the Federal Government. This currently updated edition of the Government Manual provides comprehensive and authoritative information on the legislative, judicial, and executive branches.  It also includes information on quasi-official agencies, international organizations with U.S. membership, and Federal boards, commissions, and committees.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal

**Creator:**    	    Office of the Federal Register,     	    National Archives and Records Administration,     	    U.S. Government Publishing Office

**Language:**    	    English

**Collector:**    	    U.S. Government Publishing Office

## Narrow Your Results

### 

            There are no further ways to narrow your results.           

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear

              - Sites
              - Search Page Text

Page 1 of 1  (2 Total Results)

**Sort By:**
                - Title (A-Z)
                - Title (Z-A)
                - URL (A-Z)
                - URL (Z-A)

### URL:     http://www.usgovernmentmanual.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.usgovernmentmanual.gov/?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

Page 1 of 1  (2 Total Results)

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Carlton Ray Thierry, Appellant, againt J. Edwin La Vallee, as Warden of Clinton Prison, Respondent.

Appeal from a dismissal of a writ of habeas corpus, County Court, Clinton County. By writ of habeas corpus relator attacks the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, Saratoga County, to sentence him on February 26, 1941 for murder, second degree. He contends that the two-day waiting period between plea and sentence required by section 472 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was not observed. But this can be waived *{People ex rel. Peck*v. *La Vallee,*8 A D 2d 906) and by the presence of counsel who made no objection it was waived *{People*v. *Nesbitt,*7 A D 2d 763). Relator also argues that the question required by section 480 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was not asked; but the record sufficiently establishes that the question was asked. The court had jurisdiction to enter judgment. Order dismissing writ unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.3

              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON SCHEDULE AND CONSENT

The Board of Directors
MAI Systems Corporation:

The audits referred to in our report dated March 31, 2002, included the related
financial statement schedule as of December 31, 2001, and for each of the years
in the two-year period ended December 31, 2001, included in the December 31,
2002, annual report on Form 10-K of MAI Systems Corporation. The financial
statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statement schedule
based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Forms S-3 and S-8 (Nos. 33-92194, 333-57454, 333-72412, 333-72414 and 333-72418)
of MAI Systems Corporation of our reports dated March 31, 2002, relating to the
consolidated balance sheet of MAI Systems Corporation and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' deficiency, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year
period ended December 31, 2001, and the related financial statement schedule,
which reports appear in the December 31, 2002, annual report on Form 10-K of MAI
Systems Corporation.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Costa Mesa, California
April 23, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

In connection with the Quarterly Reportof NeoMedia Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Laura A. Marriott, does hereby certify, pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to her knowledge:

 

1.              TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.              Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationof the Company.
#### Edmund W. Ballard, Respondent, v. Servio Perito, Appellant.

In an action for rescission of a lease and for other relief, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 3, 1960, denying his motion for judgment on the pleadings. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
### §44739. Pets on airplanes

(a) Prohibition.—It shall be unlawful for any person to place a live animal in an overhead storage compartment of an aircraft operated under part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

(b) Civil Penalty.—The Administrator may impose a civil penalty under section 46301 for each violation of this section.

(Added Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title IV, §417(a), Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3334.)
| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                |   |                                                            |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                |   |                                                            |   |
| Date:           May 13, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Robert Cheney                                          |   |
|                                                                                |   | Name:  Robert Cheney                                  |   |
|                                                                                |   | Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                                                                                |   |                                                            |   |
### **CHAPTER 147—ENFORCEMENT; INVESTIGATIONS; RIGHTS; REMEDIES**

Sec.
14701.
General authority.
14702.
Enforcement by the regulatory authority.
14703.
Enforcement by the Attorney General.
14704.
Rights and remedies of persons injured by carriers or brokers.
14705.
Limitation on actions by and against carriers.
14706.
Liability of carriers under receipts and bills of lading.
14707.
Private enforcement of registration requirement.
14708.
Dispute settlement program for household goods carriers.
14709.
Tariff reconciliation rules for motor carriers of property.
14710.
Enforcement of Federal laws and regulations with respect to transportation of household goods.
14711.
Enforcement by State attorneys general.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2005**—Pub. L. 109–59, title IV, §4206(c), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1757, added items 14710 and 14711.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Nomination of Alan Greenspan

              																	United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, 1970-					 and 	One Hundredth Congress, 1987-1989. 						*Nomination of Alan Greenspan : Hearing Before the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundredth Congress, First Session, July 21, 1987*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										July 21, 1987,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/279,			accessed on September 6, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-2395

___________________________

Kaila F. Gilby

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Commissioner, Social Security Administration

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Arkansas - Ft. Smith

____________

Submitted: February 27, 2019

Filed: March 18, 2019 

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Kaila F. Gilby appeals from the order of the District Court affirming the

1

decision of an administrative law judge (ALJ) denying disability insurance benefits. 

The Honorable Erin L. Wiedemann, United States Magistrate Judge for the

1

Western District of Arkansas, by consent of the parties. 
Gilby contends that the ALJ erred in his credibility determination, improperly

discounted her subjective claims of pain, and failed to develop the record regarding

her residual functional capacity (RFC). After de novo review, we conclude that the

ALJ’s decision is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. See

Chaney v. Colvin, 812 F.3d 672, 676 (8th Cir. 2016) (standard of review). We further

conclude that the ALJ’s credibility findings are entitled to deference. See Casey v.

Astrue, 503 F.3d 687, 696 (8th Cir. 2007) (explaining that if an ALJ’s credibility

determination is supported by substantial evidence, it is entitled to deference). And

“[w]hile an ALJ does have a duty to develop the record, this duty is not neverending . . . . The ALJ is required to order medical examinations and tests only if the

medical records presented to him do not give sufficient medical evidence to

determine whether the claimant is disabled.” McCoy v. Astrue, 648 F.3d 605, 612

(8th Cir. 2011). Because the medical evidence in the record constituted sufficient

evidence of Gilby’s RFC, the ALJ was not required to further develop the record

before him. 

We affirm the judgment. 

______________________________

-2-
### §14903. Tariff violations

(a) Civil Penalty for Undercharging and Overcharging.—A person that offers, grants, gives, solicits, accepts, or receives by any means transportation or service provided for property by a carrier subject to jurisdiction under chapter 135 at a rate different than the rate in effect under section 13702 is liable to the United States for a civil penalty of not more than $100,000 for each violation.

(b) General Criminal Penalty.—A carrier providing transportation or service subject to jurisdiction under chapter 135 or an officer, director, receiver, trustee, lessee, agent, or employee of a corporation that is subject to jurisdiction under that chapter, that willfully does not observe its tariffs as required under section 13702, shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.

(c) Actions of Agents and Employees.—When acting in the scope of their employment, the actions and omissions of persons acting for or employed by a carrier or shipper that is subject to this section are considered to be the actions and omissions of that carrier or shipper as well as that person.

(d) Venue.—Trial in a criminal action under this section is in the judicial district in which any part of the violation is committed or through which the transportation is conducted.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §103, Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 915; amended Pub. L. 105–102, §2(12), Nov. 20, 1997, 111 Stat. 2205.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### Pub. L. 105–102

This amends 49:14903(a) to correct a grammatical error.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 11903 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

#### Amendments

1997—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 105–102 inserted "a" before "civil penalty of not more than".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.