alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-17-00405-CR

David Duran

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 211th District Court

of Denton County (F-2003-0427-C)

June 21, 2018

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s order. It is ordered that the order of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bill Meier 

 Justice Bill Meier
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of PetroHunter Energy Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending September 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Martin B. Oring, President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: December 18, 2013
/s/ Martin B. OringMartin B. Oring, President, Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

U

For the Northern District of California

NITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

METROPOLITAN LIFE INS,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

VIVIAN B. OLSEN,

Defendant(s).

_____________________________________/

No. C 09-01212 MEJ

ORDER RE SETTLEMENT

REFERRAL

Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Although

the parties have participated in the early neutral evaluation process, the Court finds that a referral to

another magistrate judge for a settlement conference may prove fruitful prior to any ruling on the

summary judgment motions. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS the parties to file a joint

status report and state whether they would like the opportunity to attend a settlement conference. 

The parties should also indicate whether there is a particular magistrate judge to whom they would

like to be assigned. The parties shall e-file their statement by January 19, 2010. No chambers copy

is necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 12, 2010 _______________________________

Maria-Elena James 

Chief United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:09-cv-01212-MEJ Document 56 Filed 01/12/10 Page 1 of 1
----

| (1)   | The Report      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 12,      2009 |   /s/      John M. Lowber |
|-------------------------|--------------------------------|
|                    | John M.      Lowber            |
|                    | Chief      Financial Officer   |
|                    | GCI,      Inc.                 |

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 5, 2021

No. 04-21-00277-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.C.L.V, A CHILD

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-PA-01657

Kimberly Burley, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee’s motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Appellee’s brief must be filed 

on or before November 8, 2021.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of November, 2021.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
§ 47.54 Availability of an MSDS. The operator must make MSDSs accessible to miners during each work shift for each hazardous chemical to which they may be exposed either— ( a ) At each work area where the hazardous chemical is produced or used, or
( b ) At an alternative location, provided that the MSDS is readily available to miners in an emergency.
Request for Additional Information - VideoIndiana, Inc. 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Delia: 

 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition 

(Docket No. FAA-2015-2347). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which 

is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to 

proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation 

please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or 

electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request 

any further, we must receive the information described above by 9/10/2015. If we do not 

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us (202) 267-9677.

 

Sincerely,

 

Jake Troutman

 

Thank you for your interest in aviation safety. 

FAA Office of Rulemaking

Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 11:02 AM 

To: ldelia@wthr.com 

Cc: May, Rick (FAA) 

 

Request for Additional Information - VideoIndiana, Inc. Page 1 of 1

https://email.dot.gov/owa/9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions@faa.gov/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note... 8/26/2015
§ 556.808 As an operating rights owner, are there any interests I may assign without BOEM approval? ( a ) You may create, transfer, or assign economic interests without BOEM approval. However, for record purposes, you must send BOEM a copy of each instrument creating or transferring such interests within 90 days after the last party executes the transfer instrument. For each lease affected, you must pay the service fee listed in § 556.106 with your documents submitted for record purposes, and your submission must include evidence of payment via *pay.gov.*
( b ) For record keeping purposes, you may also submit other legal documents to BOEM for transactions that do not require BOEM approval. If you submit such documents for record purposes that are not required by these regulations, for each lease affected, you must pay the service fee listed in § 556.106 with your document submissions, and your submission must include evidence of payment via *pay.gov.*
#### Universal Vending Service Company, appellee, v. M. Palumbo, appellant.

Gen. No. 28,604.

Consolidated with No. 28,578 ante. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Henry M. Walker, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed November 27, 1923.

Per Ouriam.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 6/3/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

SHERMAN SURFACE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

vs.

LEROY L. YOUNG, Warden;

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

STATE OF OKLAHOMA,

Respondents - Appellees.

No. 95-6052

(D.C. No. Civ-92-631-A)

(W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before PORFILIO, McKAY and KELLY, Circuit Judges.**

Mr. Surface, appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals from the dismissal of

his habeas petition, 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He alleges that a variety of constitutional

violations undermine his state court conviction. Mr. Surface’s petition, however, was

properly dismissed by the district court based upon the failure to exhaust state remedies. 
- 2 -

In order for a state prisoner to present a federal habeas corpus action to a federal district

court, he must first demonstrate that he has exhausted his state court remedies. See

Anderson v. Harless, 459 U.S. 4, 6 (1982); Olson v. McKune, 9 F.3d 95, 95 (10th Cir. 

1993). Our review of the record indicates that claims presented in Mr. Surface’s petition

were not properly exhausted in state court. 

The district court additionally held that Mr. Surface’s claim of delay as to his

appeal to the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals is moot. Subsequent to the filing of

this action, Mr. Surface’s state appeal was denied. We need not make a determination

regarding this issue, and note that because Mr. Surface’s petition contained claims that

were not exhausted his petition is at best a mixed petition and thus subject to dismissal. 

See Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509, 522 (1982); Harris v. Champion, 48 F.3d 1127, 1133

(10th Cir. 1995)(Harris IV)(petition containing both unexhausted and exhausted claims

subject to dismissal as a mixed petition).

AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFatigue-Life Prediction Methodology Using Small-Crack TheoryThis paper reviews the capabilities of a plasticity-induced crack-closure model to predict fatigue lives of metallic materials using 'small-crack theory' for various materials and loading conditions. Crack-tip constraint factors, to account for three-dimensional state-of-stress effects, were selected to correlate large-crack growth rate data as a function of the effective-stress-intensity factor range (delta K(eff)) under constant-amplitude loading. Some modifications to the delta k(eff)-rate relations were needed in the near-threshold regime to fit measured small-crack growth rate behavior and fatigue endurance limits. The model was then used to calculate small- and large-crack growth rates, and to predict total fatigue lives, for notched and un-notched specimens made of two aluminum alloys and a steel under constant-amplitude and spectrum loading. Fatigue lives were calculated using the crack-growth relations and microstructural features like those that initiated cracks for the aluminum alloys and steel for edge-notched specimens. An equivalent-initial-flaw-size concept was used to calculate fatigue lives in other cases. Results from the tests and analyses agreed well.Document ID19970011006Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsNewmann, James C., Jr.*(National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Phillips, Edward P.*(National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Swain, M. H.*(Lockheed Martin Engineering and Sciences Co. Hampton, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1997Subject CategoryMetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:110307NASA-TM-110307Accession Number97N16065Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 538-02-10-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970011006.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 56.19038 Platforms around elevated head sheaves.

Platforms with toeboards and handrails shall be provided around elevated head sheaves.
§ 3280.102 Definitions. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 75744 , Sept. 16, 2024.
( a ) *Gross floor area* means all space, wall to wall, including recessed entries not to exceed 5 sq. ft. and areas under built-in vanities and similar furniture. Where the ceiling height is less than that specified in § 3280.104, the floor area under such ceilings shall not be included. Floor area of closets shall not be included in the gross floor area.
( b ) *Habitable room* means a room or enclosed floor space arranged for living, eating, food preparation, or sleeping purposes not including bathrooms, foyers, hallways, and other accessory floor space.
( c ) *Laundry area* means an area containing or designed to contain a laundry tray, clothes washer and/or clothes dryer.
§ 550.1165 What must I do for enhanced recovery operations? ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) Before initiating enhanced recovery operations, you must submit a proposed plan to the BSEE Regional Supervisor and receive approval for pressure maintenance, secondary or tertiary recovery, cycling, and similar recovery operations intended to increase the ultimate recovery of oil and gas from a reservoir. The proposed plan must include, for each project reservoir, a geologic and engineering overview, Form BOEM-0127 (submitted to BOEM) and supporting data as required in § 550.1167, 30 CFR 250.1167, and any additional information required by the BSEE Regional Supervisor.
( c ) [Reserved]
§ 36.24 Engine joints. ( a ) *Cylinder head.* The joint between the cylinder head and block of the engine shall be fitted with a metal or metal-clad gasket satisfactory to MSHA held securely in position by through bolts or other suitable means to prevent a change in alignment. This joint shall provide an adequate flame barrier with the gasket in place.
( b ) *Valve guides.* Valve guides shall be long enough to form an adequate flame barrier along the valve stem.
( c ) *Gaskets.* All metal or metal-clad gaskets shall maintain their tightness during repeated explosions within the engine and its intake and exhaust systems to prevent the propagation of flame.
#### §§ 285.106-285.109 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF 18 U.S.C.

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cardima, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gabriel B. Vegh, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to § 1350 of Chapter 63 of 18 U.S.C., as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/    GABRIEL B. VEGH 
|Gabriel B. Vegh        
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 13, 2004
Exhibit 31.1   CERTIFICATION  I, Larry Eastland, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Great American Family Parks, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  April 13, 2007   /s/ Larry Eastland

Larry Eastland
Chief Executive Officer
**NAVISTAR      NON-EMPLOYEE**

**DIRECTORS'      DEFERRED FEE PLAN**

**(Amended      and Restated as of January 1, 2005)**

**SECTION      1**

**PURPOSE**

**SECTION      2**

**DIRECTORS      COVERED**

----

**SECTION      4**

**PAYMENT      OF DEFERRED DIRECTORS' FEES**

|   | (a) | a                lump sum payment within 60 days of any January 1 (designated by the                Director) following the taxable year in which such fees would have                been                paid if payment of such fees had not been deferred; |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

|   | (b) | a                lump sum payment within 60 days following the Director’s separation from                service with the Company and its affiliates (as determined in accordance                with Section 409A of the Code); or |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (c) | annual                installments (over a 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, 5-year, or 10-year period,                as                designated by the Director) beginning within 60 days following the                Director’s separation from service with the Company and its affiliates (as                determined in accordance with Section 409A of the Code). The amount                of                each installment shall be equal to a fraction of the then-unpaid                portion                of any earned and vested amounts credited to the Director’s deferred cash                account and deferred stock account; the numerator of the fraction                shall be                one, and the denominator of the fraction shall be the number of                installments that have not yet been                paid. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**SECTION      5**

**MISCELLANEOUS**

----