alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §617f. Canals and appurtenant structures; transfer of title; power development

The Secretary of the Interior may, in his discretion, when repayments to the United States of all money advanced, with interest, reimbursable hereunder, shall have been made, transfer the title to said canal and appurtenant structures, except the Laguna Dam and the main canal and appurtenant structures down to and including Syphon Drop, to the districts or other agencies of the United States having a beneficial interest therein in proportion to their respective capital investments under such form of organization as may be acceptable to him. The said districts or other agencies shall have the privilege at any time of utilizing by contract or otherwise such power possibilities as may exist upon said canal, in proportion to their respective contributions or obligations toward the capital cost of said canal and appurtenant structures from and including the diversion works to the point where each respective power plant may be located. The net proceeds from any power development on said canal shall be paid into the fund and credited to said districts or other agencies on their said contracts, in proportion to their rights to develop power, until the districts or other agencies using said canal shall have paid thereby and under any contract or otherwise an amount of money equivalent to the operation and maintenance expense and cost of construction thereof.

(Dec. 21, 1928, ch. 42, §7, 45 Stat. 1062.)
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9421 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9421

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 5, 2024

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 108 North Main Street in Bucoda, Washington, as the ``Mayor Rob 
                         Gordon Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAYOR ROB GORDON POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 108 North Main Street in Bucoda, Washington, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Mayor Rob Gordon Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Mayor Rob 
Gordon Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 2024.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### § 45.5 Service of documents; independent contractors.

Service of citations, orders and other documents upon independent contractors shall be completed upon delivery to the independent contractor or mailing to the independent contractor's address of record.
#### § 254.25 What information must I include in the “Contractual agreements” appendix?

Your “Contractual agreements” appendix must furnish proof of any contracts or membership agreements with OSRO's, cooperatives, spill-response service providers, or spill management team members who are not your employees that you cite in the OSRP. To provide this proof, submit copies of the contracts or membership agreements or certify that contracts or membership agreements are in effect. The contract or membership agreement must include provisions for ensuring the availability of the personnel and/or equipment on a 24-hour-per-day basis.

[76 FR 64462, Oct. 18, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 36152, June 6, 2016]
#### Universal Vending Service Company, appellee, v. Vito Potuto and S. Pascento, appellants. Universal Vending Service Company, appellee, v. John Napoletano and Alfonso Probenzano, appellants.

Gen. No. 28,571. Gen. No. 28,572.

Forcible detainer to recover possession of news stand and concession spaces on elevated railroad platform. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Henry M. Walker, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed November 27, 1923.

*Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Max C. Liss and Clarence Darrow, for appellants. Schuyler, Ettelson & Weinfeld, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 6- 43 69

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v.
Ri ch ard Beas on
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Eas te rn Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s - Li tt le Ro ck

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Ju ly 31, 2 01 7 Fi le d: Aug us t 7 , 20 17 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re WOL LMAN, LOKEN , andBENTON, Circu it Ju dg es
.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

In th is di rect cri m in al ap pe al , Ri ch ard Bea so n ch al le ng es th e co nv ic ti on an d

se nt en ce th e di st ric t co ur t im po se d aft er he pl ead ed gu il ty to a drug ch arg e, pu rs ua nt 1

The Hon or ab le J. Leo n Ho lm es , Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t J ud ge for th e Eas te rn 1 Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s.to a writ te n pl ea ag reem en t whi ch in cl ud ed an ap pe al waiv er. His co un se l ha s m ov ed

to wit hd raw an d su bm it te d a br ie f un de r And ers v. Cal ifo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 73 8 (1 96 7) , rai si ng th e is su e th at th e se nt en ce was un reas on ab le

. Bea so n has al so fil eda pr o s e
su pp le m en ta l br ie f, arg ui ng th atth e g ov ern m en t v io la te d h is rig ht to a sp eed y tri al , th at hi s se nt en ce was im

pr op erl y en ha nc ed , a nd th at th ere was an in su ffi ci en t b as is fo r hi s co ns pi racy con vi ct io n; an d a m ot io n fo r ap po in tm en t o f ne w cou ns el

.
W e co nc lu de th at th e ap pe al waiv er is en fo rcea bl e, be cau se ou r rev ie w of th e
reco rd de m on st rat es th at B e a s o n en te red in to th e pl ea ag reem en t an d th e ap pe al waiv er k no win gl y

an d v ol un ta ril y , see Ngu y en v. Uni te d St at es , 1 14 F.3 d 6 99 , 70 3 (8 th Ci r. 19 97 ); th e arg um en ts fal l wit hi n th e sc op e of th e waiv er; an d no m is carr ia ge of jus ti ce wou ld res ul t fro m en fo rci ng th e waiv er, se e Uni te d St at es v. Sco tt , 62 7 F.3 d 70 2 , 7 0 4 ( 8 t h Ci r. 20 10 ) (d e no vo rev ie w); Uni te d St at es v. And is , 33 3 F.3 d 88 6, 89 0- 92 (8 th Ci r. 20 03 ) (en ba nc ). Fu rth erm or e, we ha ve in de pe nd en tl y rev ie wed th e
reco rd un de r Pen so n v. Ohi o, 48 8 U.S. 75 (19 88 ), an d h av e fo un d no no n- fri vo lo us is su es forap pe al ou ts id e th e sc op e o f th e wai ve r.

Acco rd in gl y , we gr an t co un se l’s m ot io n to wit hd raw, de ny th e m ot io n fo r ne w
co un se l, an d d is m is s t hi s ap pe al

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
ERRATA SHEET 2 

Dear Reader letter paragraph 2 should be replaced as follows: 

The attached Record of Decision (ROD) approves both land use planning decisions and 

implementation decisions for management of the Monument. The ROD serves as the 

final decision for the land use planning decisions described in the attached Approved 

RMP, and these decisions became effective on the date the ROD was signed. However, 

some of the decisions are implementation-level decisions that require no further 

authorization requiring public involvement prior to their implementation. Therefore, they 

may be appealed under the Department of the Interior’s appeal regulations (43 CFR Part 

4). Any party adversely affected by the implementation decisions as identified in Chapter 

2 of the RMP may appeal within 30 days of receipt of this decision in accordance with 

the provisions of 43 CFR Part 4.4. Publication of the Notice of Availability for the 

ROD/RMP in the Federal Register will be considered the date of receipt of this decision.
### **CHAPTER 23—INTERNAL SECURITY**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—CONTROL OF SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES

Sec.
781, 782.
Repealed.
783.
Offenses.
784 to 795. Repealed.
796.
Effect of subchapter on other criminal laws.
797.
Penalty for violation of security regulations and orders.
798.
Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—EMERGENCY DETENTION OF SUSPECTED SECURITY RISKS

811 to 826. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—PERSONNEL SECURITY PROCEDURES IN NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY

831.
Regulations for employment security.
832.
Full field investigation and appraisal.
833.
Repealed.
834.
"Classified information" defined.
835.
Nonapplicability of administrative procedure provisions.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—COMMUNIST CONTROL

841.
Findings and declarations of fact.
842.
Proscription of Communist Party, its successors, and subsidiary organizations.
843.
Application of Internal Security Act of 1950 to members of Communist Party and other subversive organizations; "Communist Party" defined.
844.
Determination by jury of membership in Communist Party, participation, or knowledge of purpose.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—REGISTRATION OF CERTAIN PERSONS TRAINED IN FOREIGN ESPIONAGE SYSTEMS

851.
Registration of certain persons; filing statement; regulations.
852.
Exemption from registration.
853.
Retention of registration statements; public examination; withdrawal.
854.
Rules, regulations, and forms.
855.
Violations; penalties; deportation.
856.
Continuing offense.
857.
Compliance with other registration statutes.
858.
Applicability to Canal Zone.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Application to Communist Party Members

Application of subchapters I and II of this chapter and other provisions of the Internal Security Act of 1950, as amended, to members of the Communist Party and other subversive organizations, see section 843 of this title, and References in Text note set out under that section.
March 12, 2012

The Honorable Ray LaHood, Secretary

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey, S.E.

Washington, DC 20590-0001

RE: Docket DOT-OST-2000-7182

Dear Secretary LaHood:

Brown-Forman Corporation is pleased to offer its support to the efforts of Frontier 

Airlines Inc. to initiate new nonstop jet service between Louisville, KY and Ronald 

Reagan Washington National Airport.

Frontier’s proposal brings important competition to one our region’s top air service 

routes, expands the availability of low fares in the Louisville market and significantly

expands access a top destination for business and leisure activities.

We have found Louisville and Southern Indiana to be an excellent place in which to do 

business and we believe that competitive jet service to the nation’s capital will greatly

enhance the travel options available from Louisville International Airport. We strongly 

encourage the Department of Transportation to approve Frontier’s proposal for new lowcost, large jet air service between Louisville and Washington DC.

Sincerely, 

Lisa L Lewis

Travel Manager

Brown-Forman Corporation
Exhibit 12.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Elan Sigal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of RADA Electronic
Industries Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
Subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Reserved]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: September 1, 2005

/s/Elan Sigal
-------------
Elan Sigal
----------
Chief Financial Officer
§ 33.8 Conduct of investigations, tests, and demonstrations. ( a ) Prior to the issuance of a certificate of approval or performance, necessary government personnel, representatives of the applicant, and such other persons as may be mutually agreed upon, may observe the investigations or tests. MSHA shall hold as confidential and shall not disclose principles or patentable features, nor shall it disclose any details of drawings, specifications, and related materials. After the issuance of a certificate, MSHA may conduct such public demonstrations and tests of the unit or system as it deems appropriate. The conduct of all investigations, tests, and demonstrations shall be under the direction and control of MSHA, and any other persons shall be present only as observers, except as noted in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) When requested by MSHA, the applicant shall provide assistance in disassembling parts for inspection, preparing parts for testing, and operating combination units.
[Sched. 25B, 25 FR 6473, July 9, 1960, as amended at 39 FR 24005, June 28, 1974]
### §44725. Life-limited aircraft parts

(a) In General.—The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall conduct a rulemaking proceeding to require the safe disposition of life-limited parts removed from an aircraft. The rulemaking proceeding shall ensure that the disposition deter installation on an aircraft of a life-limited part that has reached or exceeded its life limits.

(b) Safe Disposition.—For the purposes of this section, safe disposition includes any of the following methods:

(1) The part may be segregated under circumstances that preclude its installation on an aircraft.

(2) The part may be permanently marked to indicate its used life status.

(3) The part may be destroyed in any manner calculated to prevent reinstallation in an aircraft.

(4) The part may be marked, if practicable, to include the recordation of hours, cycles, or other airworthiness information. If the parts are marked with cycles or hours of usage, that information must be updated every time the part is removed from service or when the part is retired from service.

(5) Any other method approved by the Administrator.

(c) Deadlines.—In conducting the rulemaking proceeding under subsection (a), the Administrator shall—

(1) not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this section, issue a notice of proposed rulemaking; and

(2) not later than 180 days after the close of the comment period on the proposed rule, issue a final rule.

(d) Prior-Removed Life-Limited Parts.—No rule issued under subsection (a) shall require the marking of parts removed from aircraft before the effective date of the rules issued under subsection (a), nor shall any such rule forbid the installation of an otherwise airworthy life-limited part.

(Added Pub. L. 106–181, title V, §504(a), Apr. 5, 2000, 114 Stat. 134.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of the enactment of this section, referred to in subsec. (c)(1), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 106–181, which was approved Apr. 5, 2000.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable only to fiscal years beginning after Sept. 30, 1999, see section 3 of Pub. L. 106–181, set out as an Effective Date of 2000 Amendments note under section 106 of this title.
#### § 56.19057 Hoist operator's physical fitness.

No person shall operate a hoist unless within the preceding 12 months he has had a medical examination by a qualified, licensed physician who shall certify his fitness to perform this duty. Such certification shall be available at the mine.
### §40115. Withholding information

(a) Objections to Disclosure.—(1) A person may object to the public disclosure of information—

(A) in a record filed under this part; or

(B) obtained under this part by the Secretary of Transportation or State or the United States Postal Service.

(2) An objection must be in writing and must state the reasons for the objection. The Secretary of Transportation or State or the Postal Service shall order the information withheld from public disclosure when the appropriate Secretary or the Postal Service decides that disclosure of the information would—

(A) prejudice the United States Government in preparing and presenting its position in international negotiations; or

(B) have an adverse effect on the competitive position of an air carrier in foreign air transportation.

(b) Withholding Information From Congress.—This section does not authorize information to be withheld from a committee of Congress authorized to have the information.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1111.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 40115 | 49 App.:1504. | Aug. 23, 1958, Pub. L. 85–726, §1104, 72 Stat. 797; restated Oct. 24, 1978, Pub. L. 95–504, §39, 92 Stat. 1743; Feb. 15, 1980, Pub. L. 96–192, §19, 94 Stat. 43. |

Section

In subsection (a)(1)(B), the words "the Secretary of Transportation or State or the United States Postal Service" are substituted for "the Board, the Secretary of State, or the Secretary of Transportation" because under 49 App.:1551 the duties of the Civil Aeronautics Board were transferred to the Secretary of Transportation and the Postal Service.

In subsection (a)(2), the words "shall order the information withheld from public disclosure when the appropriate Secretary or the Postal Service decides that disclosure of the information" are substituted for "shall be withheld from public disclosure by the Board, the Secretary of State or the Secretary of Transportation" for clarity and because of the restatement.

In subsection (b), the words "The Board, the Secretary of State, or the Secretary of Transportation, as the case may be, shall be responsible for classified information in accordance with appropriate law" are omitted as surplus.
#### § 57.14205 Machinery, equipment, and tools.

Machinery, equipment, and tools shall not be used beyond the design capacity intended by the manufacturer, where such use may create a hazard to persons.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > The Federal Reserve Accountability Act of 1993

              																	United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs, 1977-1995					 and 	One Hundred Third Congress, 1993-1995. 						*The Federal Reserve Accountability Act of 1993 : Hearing Before the Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs, House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, First Session, October 7, 1993*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										October 7, 1993,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1153,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### LISH v. STRAUSS.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 17, 1905.)

Action by Rose Lish against Benjamin H. Strauss. No opinion. Motion denied.