alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 56.6311 Handling of misfires. ( a ) Faces and muck piles shall be examined for misfires after each blasting operation.
( b ) Only work necessary to remove a misfire and protect the safety of miners engaged in the removal shall be permitted in the affected area until the misfire is disposed of in a safe manner.
( c ) When a misfire cannot be disposed of safely, each approach to the area affected by the misfire shall be posted with a warning sign at a conspicuous location to prohibit entry, and the condition shall be reported immediately to mine management.
( d ) Misfires occurring during the shift shall be reported to mine management not later than the end of the shift.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-41430

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

PHILLIP EDWARD BAKER,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:11-CR-8-1

Before WIENER, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Phillip Edward Baker was convicted following a bench trial of receipt of 

child pornography, access with intent to view child pornography, and 

possession of child pornography and sentenced to a 135-month term of 

imprisonment and a life-term of supervised release. See 18 U.S.C. 

§ 2252A(a)(2)(B), (a)(5)(B), (b)(2). Baker challenges the district court’s denial 

of his motion to suppress evidence seized from his residence and challenges the 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 13, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 12-41430 Document: 00512531958 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/13/2014
No. 12-41430

district court’s admission of exhibits consisting of utility bills and bank 

statements found at the residence.

The district court did not err in determining that the information set 

forth in the affidavit supporting the application for a search warrant was not 

stale. See United States v. Allen, 625 F.3d 830, 842-43 (5th Cir. 2010); United 

States v. Craig, 861 F.2d 818, 822-23 (5th Cir. 1988). Baker has not 

demonstrated plain error with respect to his argument, raised for the first time 

on appeal, that an attachment describing the items to be searched for and 

seized was not attached to the search warrant, rendering the warrant 

constitutionally deficient. See United States v. Scroggins, 599 F.3d 433, 448 

(5th Cir. 2010); United States v. Rodriguez, 602 F.3d 346, 361 (5th Cir. 2010). 

Finally, the district court did not abuse its discretion in overruling Baker’s 

objection to the admission of the exhibits. See United States v. Garcia, 530 

F.3d 348, 351 (5th Cir. 2008); United States v. Arrington, 618 F.2d 1119, 1126 

(5th Cir. 1980).

AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 12-41430 Document: 00512531958 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/13/2014
§ 56.6101 Areas around explosive material storage facilities. ( a ) Areas surrounding storage facilities for explosive material shall be clear of rubbish, brush, dry grass, and trees for 25 feet in all directions, except that live trees 10 feet or taller need not be removed.
( b ) Other combustibles shall not be stored or allowed to accumulate within 50 feet of explosive material. Combustible liquids shall be stored in a manner that ensures drainage will occur away from the explosive material storage facility in case of tank rupture.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  In connection with this Quarterly Report of Omega Commercial Finance Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jon Cummings, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Omega Commercial Finance Corp.  Dated: August 6, 2007  OMEGA COMMERCIAL FINANCE CORP.  By: /s/ Jon Cummings Jon Cummings Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.3


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This Certification is intended to accompany the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
NCO Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and is
given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. To
the best of his knowledge, the undersigned, Steven L. Winokur, Chief Financial
Officer, hereby certifies that:

    1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.


    /s/   Steven L. Winokur, Chief Financial Officer
          ------------------

          Date: 8/14/02
### [§47131. Repealed. Pub. L. 118–63, title II, §218(d), May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1055]

Section, Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1278, §47129; renumbered §47131, Pub. L. 103–305, title I, §113(a)(1), Aug. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 1577; amended Pub. L. 106–181, title VII, §722, Apr. 5, 2000, 114 Stat. 165; Pub. L. 112–95, title I, §152(c), Feb. 14, 2012, 126 Stat. 34, related to annual report submitted to Congress on activities carried out under this subchapter during the prior fiscal year.
Swanson, Brian (OST) 

From: 

Sent:, 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Mr. Swanson, 

Dale Harrison <deharrison@printpack.com> 

Wednesday, September 05, 2012 8:51 AM 

Swanson, Brian (OST); Devany, Dennis (OST) 

jbrauer@newnorth.net; rhiarpt@newnorth.net 

EAS Rhinelander Wisconsin Airport 

Thank you for your 31 August voice mail in response to my request to comment on Essential Air Service for 

Rhinelander, Wisconsin I Oneida County Airport. Printpack Inc, a large manufacturing firm located in 

Rhinelander since 1987, frequently uses services of the Rhinelander airport for travel to company headquarters 

in Atlanta, Georgia as well as to 19 other company locations. The airport can provide a valuable business 

service critical to the success of our $72 million Rhinelander expansion project which will start in mid 

September 2012. 

Printpack encourages timely selection of a carrier or carriers which can secure agreements with Delta Airlines 

for reliable service via Milwaukee and Minneapolis/ St. Paul to serve Rhinelander I Onieda County Airport. 

Regards, 

Oa!e Harrison 

Inc 1 2800 Overlook 

404.460.7307 i C: 404.808.1291 

~ 

L.::lt~ 

I GA 30339 

404.696.1205 

NOTICE: This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain 

legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the 

addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 

hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use 

of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 

message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone or by 

electronic mail, and delete this message and all copies and backups thereof. 

Thank you. 

1
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Simon Property Group, L.P. (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen E. Sterrett, Chief Financial Officer of Simon Property Group, Inc., the sole general partner of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/STEPHEN E. STERRETTStephen E. Sterrett
Chief Financial Officer
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Sole General Partner of the Company
August 14, 2002 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 

---

QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3355 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3355

  To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain drawback 
                 claims relating to petroleum products.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 19, 2005

Mr. Jefferson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain drawback 
                 claims relating to petroleum products.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DRAWBACK CLAIMS RELATING TO PETROLEUM PRODUCTS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, the Bureau of 
Customs and Border Protection of the Department of Homeland Security 
shall, not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, liquidate or reliquidate each drawback claim described in 
subsection (c) at the full amount in each such claim.
    (b) Payments of Amounts Due.--Any amounts owed by the United States 
pursuant to liquidations or reliquidations under subsection (a) shall 
be paid by the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection within 90 days 
after such liquidation or reliquidation.
    (c) Drawback Claims.--The drawback claims referred to in subsection 
(a) are the following:

 
 
 
Drawback Claim Number:              Filing Date:
  BQ901000001.....................  06/27/95
  BQ902000000.....................  07/01/95
  BQ903000009.....................  07/01/95
  BQ904000008.....................  07/12/95
  BQ905000007.....................  07/12/95
  BQ906000006.....................  07/14/95
  BQ907000005.....................  07/14/95
  BQ908000004.....................  07/14/95
  BQ909000003.....................  07/20/95
  BQ910000000.....................  07/20/95
  BQ911000009.....................  07/20/95
  BQ900000259.....................  07/25/95
  BQ913000007.....................  07/25/95
  BQ914000006.....................  07/28/95
  BQ915000005.....................  08/07/95
  BQ916000004.....................  08/07/95.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Veritas DGC Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended October 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I,
Matthew D. Fitzgerald, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.   The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
           or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.   The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.


March 10, 2003
                                                     /s/ Matthew D. Fitzgerald
                                                     -------------------------
                                                     Matthew D. Fitzgerald
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
§ 56.20002 Potable water. ( a ) An adequate supply of potable drinking water shall be provided at all active working areas.
( b ) The common drinking cup and containers from which drinking water must be dipped or poured are prohibited.
( c ) Where single service cups are supplied, a sanitary container for unused cups and a receptacle for used cups shall be provided.
( d ) When water is cooled by ice, the ice shall either be of potable water or shall not come in contact with the water.
( e ) Potable water outlets shall be posted.
( f ) Potable water systems shall be constructed to prevent backflow or backsiphonage of non-potable water.
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1302 What if I have a competitive reservoir on a lease? ( a ) The Regional Supervisor may require you to conduct development and production operations in a competitive reservoir under either a joint Competitive Reservoir Development Program submitted to BSEE or a unitization agreement. A competitive reservoir has one or more producing or producible well completions on each of two or more leases, or portions of leases, with different lease operating interests. For purposes of this paragraph, a producible well completion is a well which is capable of production and which is shut in at the well head or at the surface but not necessarily connected to production facilities and from which the operator plans future production.
( b ) You may request that the Regional Supervisor make a preliminary determination whether a reservoir is competitive. When you receive the preliminary determination, you have 30 days (or longer if the Regional Supervisor allows additional time) to concur or to submit an objection with supporting evidence if you do not concur. The Regional Supervisor will make a final determination and notify you and the other lessees.
( c ) If you conduct drilling or production operations in a reservoir determined competitive by the BSEE Regional Supervisor, you and the other affected lessees must submit for approval a joint Competitive Reservoir Development Program. You must submit the joint Competitive Reservoir Development Program within 90 days after the Regional Supervisor makes a final determination that the reservoir is competitive. The joint Competitive Reservoir Development Program must provide for the development and/or production of the reservoir. You may submit supplemental Competitive Reservoir Development Programs for the Regional Supervisor's approval.
( d ) If you and the other affected lessees cannot reach an agreement on a joint Competitive Reservoir Development Program, submitted to BSEE within the approved period of time, each lessee must submit a separate Competitive Reservoir Development Program to the Regional Supervisor. The Regional Supervisor will hold a hearing to resolve differences in the separate Competitive Reservoir Development Programs. If the differences in the separate programs are not resolved at the hearing and the Regional Supervisor determines that unitization is necessary under § 250.1301(b), BSEE will initiate unitization under § 250.1304.
[76 FR 64462, Oct. 18, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 36150, June 6, 2016]
 اغسل يديك  افحص الكمامة

اغسل يديك بالماء والصابون، أو باستخدام أحد المعقمات التي تحتوي على الكحول 

بتركيز %60 على األقل.

ًا عن وجود أي تلف. إذا كانت الكمامة تبدو تالفة أو رطبة، 

افحص الكمامة بحث

فال تستخدمها.

 وضع الكمامة

ضع الكمامة على يديك؛ بحيث يصبح 

الجزء الواقي لألنف على أطراف 

أصابعك، وتتدلى أشرطة الكمامة 

خلف يديك.

ِّغط فمك وأنفك باستخدام الكمامة؛ 

وتأكد من عدم وجود فتحات )مثل: شعر 

الوجه، والشعر، والنظارة( بين وجهك 

والكمامة.

ضع الشريط على رأسك، وثبته على 

الجزء األعلى الخلفي من رأسك. إذا 

كان هناك شريط آخر، فضع الشريط 

السفلي حول رقبتك وتحت األذنين. 

ال تجعل الشريطين متقاطعين.

إذا كانت كمامتك تحتوي على مشبك 

أنف معدني، فاستخدم أطراف أصابع 

-كلتا يديك- لتشكيل منطقة األنف 

حول أنفك.

 تعديل الكمامة  ارتداء الكمامة

ضع كال يديك على الكمامة. استنشق 

بسرعة ثم أخرج الهواء. إذا شعرت 

بتسريب للهواء من األنف، فأعد ضبط 

الجزء الواقي لألنف؛ إذا كان التسرب 

من أطراف الكمامة، فأعد تعديل 

الشريطين. 

كرر الخطوة حتى تصبح مانعة للتسرب 

بصورة مناسبة. إذا لم يمكنك جعلها 

ّ مانعة للتسرب، فجرب كمامة أخرى.

تجنب لمس الكمامة أثناء ارتدائها.

إذا فعلت ذلك، فاغسل يديك.

 خلع الكمامة  التخلص من الكمامة

اغسل يديك. اخلع الكمامة من الخلف. ال تلمس 

الجانب األمامي.

إذا لم تكن هناك حاجة إلعادة استخدام الكمامة؛ 

بسبب نقص في اإلمدادات، فتخلص منها في سلة 

نفايات مغلقة. واغسل يديك.

سبع خطوات الرتداء الكمامة بطريقة صحيحة أثناء العمل

سيساعدك اتباع هذه الخطوات البسيطة على ارتداء كمامتك وخلعها بصورة مناسبة، والحفاظ على سالمتك 

وسالمة اآلخرين.

للحصول على مزيد من 

المعلومات، شاهد الفيديو القصير، 

"ارتداء وخلع الكمامة". 

مالحظة: إذا أعدت استخدام 

 قفازا أثناء فحص 

ِ الكمامة، فارتد ً

الكمامة وارتدائها. تجنب لمس 

الوجه )بما في ذلك العينين، 

واألنف، والفم( أثناء هذه العملية. 

(6742) OSHA1-800-321-

1-877-889-5627 TTY

 to Steps Seven — 2020 4036-06 OSHA

(Arabic (Work at Respirator a Wear Correctly

gov.osha.www
Exhibit 4.3
 AMENDED RESTRICTED STOCK ISSUANCE AND ALLOCATION AGREEMENT
2007 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
 Agreement  BVI Company A BVI Company B China Finance
 R E C I T A L S
 Grant Agreement
 Granted
Shares
 Original Vesting Term




---



##### 



AGREEMENT
   Vesting Schedule. Amended Vesting Term
 Performance Target and Performance Ratio for 2008
    Performance Target and Performance Ratio for 2009
  2




---



##### 



Performance Target and Performance Ratio for 2010
 Performance Target and Performance Ratio for 2011
 Performance Target and Performance Ratio for 2012
    3




---



##### 



Forfeitures
  Termination of Employment
 Chief Executive Officer
  4




---



##### 



5




---



##### 



CHINA FINANCE ONLINE CO. LTD.By:
    /s/ Ling WangName:
    Ling WangDirector on the Compensation
Its:            CommitteC&F INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LIMITEDBy:
    /s/ Zhiwei ZhaoName:
    Zhiwei ZhaoIts: Fenghua International Limited
Sole DirectorFENGHUA INTERNATIONAL LIMITEDBy:
    /s/ Zhiwei ZhaoName:
    Zhiwei ZhaoIts: Sole Director ZHIWEI ZHAOSignature:
    
    /s/ Zhiwei ZhaoPrinted Name: Zhiwei Zhao  6
### §353. Toxicological testing of officers and employees

(a) Collecting Specimens.—When the Secretary of Transportation or the head of a component of the Department of Transportation conducts post-accident or post-incident toxicological testing of an officer or employee of the Department, the Secretary or head shall collect the specimen from the officer or employee as soon as practicable after the accident or incident. The Secretary or head shall try to collect the specimen not later than 4 hours after the accident or incident.

(b) Reports.—The head of each component shall submit a report to the Secretary on the circumstances about the amount of time required to collect the specimen for a toxicological test conducted on an officer or employee who is reasonably associated with the circumstances of an accident or incident under the investigative jurisdiction of the National Transportation Safety Board.

(c) Noncompliance Not a Defense.—An officer or employee required to submit to toxicological testing may not assert failure to comply with this section as a claim, cause of action, or defense in an administrative or judicial proceeding.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §4(j)(10)(A), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1368.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 353 | 49 App.:1657–1. | Nov. 28, 1990, Pub. L. 101–641, §5, 104 Stat. 4656. |

Section

In this section, the words "officer or employee" are substituted for "employee" for clarity and consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.

In subsection (a), the words "Secretary of Transportation or the head of a component of the Department of Transportation" are substituted for "Department of Transportation, including any of its agencies" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the Code.

In subsection (b), the word "Secretary" is substituted for "Office of the Secretary of Transportation" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the Code. The words "within that agency" are omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (c), the words "An officer or employee required to submit to toxicological testing may not assert" are substituted for "may not be asserted" for clarity.
Exhibit 10.2

                                PROMISSORY NOTE

Principal  amount:  $700,000.00

Date  November  13,  2002

FOR  VALUE  RECEIVED,  Paving  Stone  Corporation  (the  Company),  a  Nevada
corporation, hereby Promises, to pay to the order of Jack Hight or his assignee,
the  sum  of  seven  hundred  Thousand  dollars  ($700,000.00).

Full  payment  including  unpaid  interest  will  be  due  January  31,  2004.

Interest will be payable semi-annually and will accrue at an annual rate of 10%,
beginning  on  the  date  of  funding.

The  Company  will  reimburse  all fees and expenses of Jack Hight in connection
with  this  funding  up  to  $2500.

All  payments  hereunder shall be made by Paving Stone Corporation to Jack Hight
or  his  assignee at the following address: 369 South Lake Drive, Palm Bch., Fl.
33480.
All  notices  to  Paving Stone Corporation Shall be sent to its headquarters, at
the
Following  address:  1760  N.W.  22  Court,  Pompano  Beach,  Florida  33069

Paving  Stone  Corporation agrees to secure this note with collateral, including
common  stock  or  other  assets  of  the  company.

Paving  Stone  Corporation agrees to remain fully bound until this note shall be
fully  paid.
No  modification  or  indulgence by the holder hereof shall be binding unless in
writing.
Any  indulgence  on any one occasion shall not be an indulgence for any other or
future
Occasion.

Jack  Hight,  at  his  sole  discretion,  may  convert  this  note into a bridge
financing  instrument  currently  being prepared by the company. Such instrument
will  be  available  in  draft  form  within  5  business  days.

It  is  agreed  by both parties that by executing this note, the Promissory Note
for $200,000 dated September 5, 2002 payable by Paving Stone Corporation to Jack
Hight  is  hereby  null  and  void.

Agreed  to  and  executed  by  the  President  of Paving Stone Corporation, with
binding
Authority,  on  behalf  of  Paving  Stone Corporation, this 13th day of November
2002.

/s/  Maurice  Sigouin
---------------------                    ------------------------------------
Maurice  Sigouin  (sign)                                 (print)

/s/  Jack  Hight
----------------                         ------------------------------------
Jack  Hight  (sign)                                      (print)