alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §80109. Liens under negotiable bills

A common carrier issuing a negotiable bill of lading has a lien on the goods covered by the bill for—

(1) charges for storage, transportation, and delivery (including demurrage and terminal charges), and expenses necessary to preserve the goods or incidental to transporting the goods after the date of the bill; and

(2) other charges for which the bill expressly specifies a lien is claimed to the extent the charges are allowed by law and the agreement between the consignor and carrier.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1349.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 80109 | 49 App.:105. | Aug. 29, 1916, ch. 415, §25, 39 Stat. 542. |

Section

In this section, before clause (1), the word "If" is omitted as surplus. The words "covered by the bill" are substituted for "therein mentioned" for clarity. In clause (1), the words "charges for storage, transportation, and delivery (including demurrage and terminal charges)" are substituted for "all charges on those goods for freight, storage, demurrage and terminal charges . . . and all other charges incurred in transportation and delivery" as being inclusive and to conform to section 7–307 of the Uniform Commercial Code. In clause (2), the words "other charges for which the bill expressly specifies a lien" are substituted for "unless the bill expressly enumerates other charges for which a lien . . . In such case there shall also be a lien for the charges enumerated" for clarity.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBroadband Noise Control Using Predictive TechniquesPredictive controllers have found applications in a wide range of industrial processes. Two types of such controllers are generalized predictive control and deadbeat control. Recently, deadbeat control has been augmented to include an extended horizon. This modification, named deadbeat predictive control, retains the advantage of guaranteed stability and offers a novel way of control weighting. This paper presents an application of both predictive control techniques to vibration suppression of plate modes. Several system identification routines are presented. Both algorithms are outlined and shown to be useful in the suppression of plate vibrations. Experimental results are given and the algorithms are shown to be applicable to non- minimal phase systems.Document ID19970018176Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsEure, Kenneth W.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Juang, Jer-Nan*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1997Subject CategoryAcousticsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:110320NASA-TM-110320Accession Number97N20251Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 538-03-14-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970018176.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 22.9 How approvals are granted.

All approvals are granted by official letter from MSHA. A detector will be approved under this part only when the testing engineers have judged that it has met the requirements of the schedule and MSHA's records are complete, including drawings from the manufacturer that show the detector as it is to be commercially made. No verbal reports of the investigation will be given and no informal approvals will be granted. As soon as the manufacturer has received the formal approval, he shall be free to advertise his detector as permissible.

[Sched. 8C, Oct. 31, 1935, as amended by Supp. 1, 20 FR 2575, Apr. 19, 1955]
1/28/2016 1 

### SUMMARY OF DRAFT AMBIENT AIR MONITORING PROTOCOL FOR METHYL BROMIDE IN THE MARITIME EXCHANGE REGION FOR THE DELAWARE RIVER AND BAY US EPA GUIDELINE SS-1076 JANUARY 28, 2016 

## PERSONNEL Sponsor: Methyl Bromide Industry Panel1/28/2016 2 

## PARAMETERS • Requested by GDCI Dated August 6, 2014 • To be conducted in the Maritime Exchange Region of Delaware River and Bay • Study duration – two consecutive years • To be conducted in compliance with FIFRA Good Laboratory Practices • Protocol to be approved by EPA prior to study initiation • Annual reports to EPA 

## PROPOSED STUDY LOCATION1/28/2016 3 

## PROPOSED STUDY LOCATION -DETAIL1/28/2016 41/28/2016 51/28/2016 61/28/2016 71/28/2016 81/28/2016 91/28/2016 10 

## PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE Tentative project schedule, depending on EPA review and approval of Protocol.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 02, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 02, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15A1379. COMPLETE HEALTH DIAGNOSTICS, INC. v. CLPF GWINNETT MOB L.

P..

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
#### Glen Prentice, Respondent, v. New York State Electric *&*Gas Corporation et al., Appellants. New York State Electric *&*Gas Corporation, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bradley & Williams, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. Vernetta Russell, as Limited Administratrix of the Estate of Edward L. Russell, Deceased, Respondent, v. New York State Electric *&*Gas Corporation et al., Appellants. New York State Electric *&*Gas Corporation, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bradley *&*Williams, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Motion for reargument, or in the alternative, for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, without costs.
#### In the Matter of Carol Diaz-Kamen, Petitioner, v Donald R. Blydenburgh, as Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

[831 NYS2d 728]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent Donald R. Blydenburgh, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, to issue a written decision with respect to certain matrimonial.issues.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see *Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman,*53 NY2d 12, 16 [1981]). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Schmidt, J.P., Spolzino, Florio and Skelos, JJ., concur.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9436 

To establish a National Science Foundation grant program to provide and 

strengthen opportunities for peer-led research regarding autism spectrum 

disorder and its characteristics in women, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 30, 2024 

Mr. KHANNA (for himself, Ms. TENNEY, and Mr. FITZPATRICK) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, 

and Technology 

A BILL 

To establish a National Science Foundation grant program 

to provide and strengthen opportunities for peer-led research regarding autism spectrum disorder and its characteristics in women, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Supporting Peer-led 

5 Efforts to Conduct Thoughtful Research and Understand 

6 the Modalities of Autism in Women and Girls Act’’ or the 

7 ‘‘SPECTRUM Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9436 IH

1 SEC. 2. NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION GRANT PRO2 GRAM TO STRENGTHEN OPPORTUNITIES FOR 

3 PEER-LED RESEARCH REGARDING AUTISM 

4 SPECTRUM DISORDER. 

5 The Director of the National Science Foundation is 

6 authorized to award grants on a competitive basis to sup7 port participatory research approaches into autism, in8 cluding with respect to women and girls. Such research 

9 may include research into any of the following: 

10 (1) Characteristics of autism in girls and 

11 women, including the incidence of ‘‘masking’’, ‘‘cam12 ouflaging’’, or other psychosocial factors. 

13 (2) Communication between autistic and 

14 neurotypical women and girls, and the phenomenon 

15 of the ‘‘double empathy problem’’ theory. 

16 (3) Additional related topics at the discretion of 

17 the Director. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
### §32917. Standards for executive agency automobiles

(a) Definition.—In this section, "executive agency" has the same meaning given that term in section 105 of title 5.

(b) Fleet Average Fuel Economy.—(1) The President shall prescribe regulations that require passenger automobiles leased for at least 60 consecutive days or bought by executive agencies in a fiscal year to achieve a fleet average fuel economy (determined under paragraph (2) of this subsection) for that year of at least the greater of—

(A) 18 miles a gallon; or

(B) the applicable average fuel economy standard under section 32902(b) or (c) of this title for the model year that includes January 1 of that fiscal year.

(2) Fleet average fuel economy is—

(A) the total number of passenger automobiles leased for at least 60 consecutive days or bought by executive agencies in a fiscal year (except automobiles designed for combat-related missions, law enforcement work, or emergency rescue work); divided by

(B) the sum of the fractions obtained by dividing the number of automobiles of each model leased or bought by the fuel economy of that model.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1075.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 32917(a) | 15:2010(b)(2). | Oct. 20, 1972, Pub. L. 92–513, 86 Stat. 947, §510; added Dec. 22, 1975, Pub. L. 94–163, §301, 89 Stat. 915. |
| 32917(b) | 15:2010(a), (b)(1), (3). | |

Section

In subsection (b)(1), before clause (A), the words "within 120 days after December 22, 1975" and "which begins after December 22, 1975" are omitted as executed. The words "(determined under paragraph (2) of this subsection)" are added for clarity.

In subsection (b)(2), before clause (A), the words "As used in this section: (1) The term" are omitted as surplus. In clause (A), the words "to which this section applies" and "for the Armed Forces" are omitted as surplus. In clause (B), the words "the sum of the fractions obtained" are substituted for "a sum of terms, each term of which is a fraction created" to eliminate unnecessary words.
#### § 57.4362 Underground rescue and firefighting operations.

Following evacuation of a mine in a fire emergency, only persons wearing and trained in the use of mine rescue apparatus shall participate in rescue and firefighting operations in advance of the fresh air base.
IIB 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9421 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 5, 2024 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 108 North Main Street in Bucoda, Washington, as the ‘‘Mayor Rob Gordon Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

HR 9421 RFS

1 SECTION 1. MAYOR ROB GORDON POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 108 North Main Street in 

4 Bucoda, Washington, shall be known and designated as 

5 the ‘‘Mayor Rob Gordon Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Mayor Rob Gordon 

10 Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 

2024. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
### §49110. Use of Dulles Airport Access Highway

The Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority shall continue in effect and enforce section 4.2(1) and (2) of the Metropolitan Washington Airports Regulations, as in effect on February 1, 1995. The district courts of the United States have jurisdiction to compel the Airports Authority and its officers and employees to comply with this section. The Attorney General or an aggrieved party may bring an action on behalf of the United States Government.

(Added Pub. L. 105–102, §2(26), Nov. 20, 1997, 111 Stat. 2213.)

| RevisedSection | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 49110 | (uncodified). | Oct. 18, 1986, Pub. L. 99–500, title VI, §6013, as added Oct. 9, 1996, Pub. L. 104–264, title IX, §906, 110 Stat. 3277. |
| | | Oct. 30, 1986, Pub. L. 99–591, title VI, §6013, as added Oct. 9, 1996, Pub. L. 104–264, title IX, §906, 110 Stat. 3277. |

Section

The words "Except as provided by subsection (b)" and "the requirements of" are omitted as unnecessary.
### §20148. Railroad car visibility

(a) Review of Rules.—The Secretary of Transportation shall conduct a review of the Department of Transportation's rules with respect to railroad car visibility. As part of this review, the Secretary shall collect relevant data from operational experience by railroads having enhanced visibility measures in service.

(b) Regulations.—If the review conducted under subsection (a) establishes that enhanced railroad car visibility would likely improve safety in a cost-effective manner, the Secretary shall initiate a rulemaking proceeding to prescribe regulations requiring enhanced visibility standards for newly manufactured and remanufactured railroad cars. In such proceeding the Secretary shall consider, at a minimum—

(1) visibility of railroad cars from the perspective of nonrailroad traffic;

(2) whether certain railroad car paint colors should be prohibited or required;

(3) the use of reflective materials;

(4) the visibility of lettering on railroad cars;

(5) the effect of any enhanced visibility measures on the health and safety of train crew members; and

(6) the cost/benefit ratio of any new regulations.

(c) Exclusions.—In prescribing regulations under subsection (b), the Secretary may exclude from any specific visibility requirement any category of trains or railroad operations if the Secretary determines that such an exclusion is in the public interest and is consistent with railroad safety.

(Added Pub. L. 103–440, title II, §212(a), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4622.)
### §13712. Government traffic

A carrier providing transportation or service for the United States Government may transport property or individuals for the United States Government without charge or at a rate reduced from the applicable commercial rate. Section 6101(b) to (d) of title 41 does not apply when transportation for the United States Government can be obtained from a carrier lawfully operating in the area where the transportation would be provided.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §103, Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 879; amended Pub. L. 111–350, §5(o)(5), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3853.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 10721 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

#### Amendments

2011—Pub. L. 111–350 substituted "Section 6101(b) to (d) of title 41" for "Section 3709 of the Revised Statutes (41 U.S.C. 5)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of NCO Group, Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”) that: 

|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |   |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |   |

| Date:  | August 9, 2005 | /s/ Michael J. Barrist  |
|--------|----------------|-------------------------|
|        |           |                         |
|   |           | Michael J. Barrist      |
|   |           | Chief Executive Officer |
|   |           |                    |
|   |           |                    |
| Date:  | August 9, 2005 | /s/ Steven L. Winokur   |
|        |           |                         |
|   |           | Steven L. Winokur       |
|   |           | Chief Financial Officer |

     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

----
From: Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US 

To: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Date: 02/18/2011 04:33 PM 

Subject:RE: Boiler MACT Final Version 2-17-11.docx Clean Version 

Attached is a revised version that reflects the requested changes. 

Thanks! 

Brian 

(See attached file: Boiler MACT Final Version 2-17-11.docx) 

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To: Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 02/18/2011 04:25 PM 

Subject:RE: Boiler MACT Final Version 2-17-11.docx Clean Version 

Hi Brian, 

Attached is a redline of the Boiler MACT; the suggested edit pares down the EJ EO section and pulls the 

supporting document reference out of a footnote. This tracks with edits made in SSI. Let me know if 

you have any questions. 

Regards, 

Cortney 

-----Original Message----- 

From: Shrager.Brian@epamail.epa.gov [ 

mailto:Shrager.Brian@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 2:46 PM 

To: Higgins, Cortney 

Cc: Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov; Eddinger.Jim@epamail.epa.gov 

Subject: Boiler MACT Final Version 2-17-11.docx Clean Version 

Cortney, 

Attached is the clean version of the Major Source Boilers NESHAP. 

Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. 

Thanks! 

Brian 

(See attached file: Boiler MACT Final Version 2-17-11.docx) 

[attachment "Boiler MACT Final Version 2-17-11_EO12866Comments.docx" 

deleted by Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US]
### §2362. Transfers of allocations among cooperative threat reduction programs

Congress finds that—

(1) the various Cooperative Threat Reduction programs are being carried out at different rates in the various countries covered by such programs; and

(2) it is necessary to authorize transfers of funding allocations among the various programs in order to maximize the effectiveness of United States efforts under such programs.

(Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title XIV, §1452, Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2730.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Specification of Cooperative Threat Reduction Programs

Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title XV, §1501, Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2731, as amended by Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title XIII, §1301(a)(2), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2161; Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title XIII, §1303, Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 412, specified Cooperative Threat Reduction programs for purposes of Pub. L. 104–201, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title XIII, §1351(5), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3607.
### §1921h. Authorization and continuing appropriation

(a) There are authorized and appropriated to the Department of the Interior, out of any funds in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to remain available until expended, such sums as are necessary to carry out the purposes of sections 1921d(f)(1) and 1921d(i) of this title, sections 211, 212(b), 215, and 217 of the U.S.-FSM Compact, and sections 211, 212, 213(b), 216, and 218 of the U.S.-RMI Compact, in this and subsequent years.

(b) There are authorized to be appropriated to the Departments, agencies, and instrumentalities named in paragraphs (1) and (3) through (6) of section 221(a) of the U.S.-FSM Compact and paragraphs (1) and (3) through (5) of section 221(a) of the U.S.-RMI Compact, such sums as are necessary to carry out the purposes of sections 221(a) of the U.S.-FSM Compact and the U.S.-RMI Compact, to remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 108–188, title I, §109, Dec. 17, 2003, 117 Stat. 2756.)
#### Maude K. Hayes, Appellant, v. Ralph Hoffman et al., Respondents.

— Order dismissing the second amended complaint as to certain defendants unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to any party, and motion denied, without costs and without prejudice to the right to renew in accordance with the memorandum. Memorandum: See our Memorandum in *Hayes*v. *Utica Mutual Ins. Co.*(16 A D 2d 732) decided herewith. We also add that this same motion had originally been denied as to these defendants. The motion which resulted in this order was not for reargument but was a completely new motion, and nothing new or additional was submitted or added. Nevertheless Special Term granted the motion which previously had been denied. This, of course, was improper. (Appeal from order of Oneida Special Term dismissing the second amended complaint.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
§ 560.230 What criteria does BOEM use for selecting bidding systems and bidding system components? In analyzing the application of one of the bidding systems listed in § 560.110 to tracts selected for any OCS lease sale, we may, at our discretion, consider the following purposes and policies. We recognize that each of the purposes and policies may not be specifically applicable to the selection process for a particular bidding system or tract, or may present a conflict that we will have to resolve in the process of bidding system selection. The order of listing does not denote a ranking. ( a ) Providing fair return to the Federal Government;
( b ) Increasing competition;
( c ) Ensuring competent and safe operations;
( d ) Avoiding undue speculation;
( e ) Avoiding unnecessary delays in exploration, development, and production;
( f ) Discovering and recovering oil and gas;
( g ) Developing new oil and gas resources in an efficient and timely manner;
( h ) Limiting the administrative burdens on Government and industry; and
( i ) Providing an opportunity to experiment with various bidding systems to enable us to identify those most appropriate for the satisfaction of the objectives of the United States in OCS lease sales.