alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.3.b.iv**AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**     This Amendment to Employment Agreement is hereby entered into as of December 29, 2006 by andamong Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Corporation”), Cedar ShoppingCenters Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”) and Brenda J. Walker(the “Executive”).**W I T N E S S E T H:**     WHEREAS, the Corporation, the Partnership and the Executive entered into that certainEmployment Agreement dated as of November 1, 2003, as presently in effect (the “EmploymentAgreement”); and     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation (on the Corporation’s own behalf, and asthe sole general partner of the Partnership) approved the modification to certain provisions of theEmployment Agreement;     NOW THEREFORE, intending to be legally bound the parties hereto agree as follows:     1. Section 2.1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety asfollows:     “2.1 The term of employment shall end October 31, 2008, unless sooner terminated asprovided in this Agreement.”     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to Employment Agreement as of thedate first above written.      CEDAR SHOPPING CENTERS, INC.
### [§726. Renumbered §1325]
#### § 56.10007 Falling object protection.

Guard nets or other suitable protection shall be provided where tramways pass over roadways, walkways, or buildings.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Louis Muchard, Respondent, v. Paul Latone et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Award insofar as it determines that the claimant was in the employ of Paul Latone affirmed, but the rate to be reflected in the award remitted to the board for further consideration, without costs. No opinion. Bergan, P. J., Coon, •Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Standard Steel Section, Inc., Respondent, v Royal Guard Fence Co., Inc., Appellant.

In a proceeding in effect to stay arbitration, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated November 9, 1977, which (1) granted the petitioner’s motion to reargue a prior order of the same court and (2) upon reargument, denied appellant’s motion to dismiss the demand for arbitration. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Although the demand for arbitration, which was served by ordinary mail, did not satisfy the requirements of CPLR 7503 (subd [c]) (see *Jefferson v Government Employees Ins. Co.,*48 AD2d 855), the appellant has waived its objection by generally appearing in the arbitration proceeding in that it (1) requested a change of venue and an extension of its time to answer in a letter to the American Arbitration Association; (2) participated in the selection of the arbitrators and the scheduling of the arbitration hearing; and (3) submitted an application to Special Term, which had the effect of adjourning the arbitration hearing. The appellant’s active involvement as a genuine actor in the proceeding antedated its objection to the improper manner of serving the demand. Consequently, the objection has been waived (cf. CPLR 320, subd [a]). Suozzi, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
### §24901. Definitions

In this chapter—

(1) "final system plan" means the final system plan (including additions) adopted by the United States Railway Association under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act of 1973 (45 U.S.C. 701 et seq.).

(2) "rail carrier" means an express carrier and a rail carrier as defined in section 10102 of this title, including Amtrak.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 930.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 24901(1) | (no source). | |
| 24901(2) | (no source). | |

Section

This section is derived from 45:802 for clarity. That section contains definitions for the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 (Public Law 94–210, 90 Stat. 33). Title VII of that Act is the source of the source provisions restated in this chapter. However, other titles of that Act are not being restated because they are outside the scope of the restatement. Therefore, 45:802 is not being restated in this restatement and only the relevant definitions are accounted for in this chapter.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Regional Rail Reorganization Act of 1973, referred to in par. (1), is Pub. L. 93–236, Jan. 2, 1974, 87 Stat. 985, which is classified principally to chapter 16 (§701 et seq.) of Title 45, Railroads. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 701 of Title 45 and Tables.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





DateMay
                1, 2007
            By:*/s/ Charles W. Fritz*Name: Charles
                W. FritzTitle: Interim
                Chief Executive Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. and will be
      retained by NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 56.19083 Overtravel backout device.

A manually operated device shall be installed on each electric hoist that will allow the conveyance or counterbalance to be removed from an over-travel position. Such device shall not release the brake, or brakes, holding the overtravelled conveyance or counterbalance until sufficient drive motor torque has been developed to assure movement of the conveyance or counterbalance in the correct direction only.
EXHIBIT 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with Quarterly Report of Cogo Group, Inc. and its
subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Jeffrey Kang, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |        |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 8, 2008 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Jeffrey Kang       
|                      |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Jeffrey Kang           
|                      |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer



35
1



### MEMORA **NDUM** TO: Public Record for the NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule

EPA Docket Number EPA - HQ - OECA - 2009 - 0274 (www.regulations.gov) FROM: Carey

A. Johnston, P.E. USEPA/O ECA/OC ph: (202) 566 1014 johnston.carey @epa.gov DATE: 31 August 2012 SUBJECT: Adoption rates of Permittees Where States Have the Option for E - Reporting DMRs

[ D CN 0027 ] **Status of States R** **egarding e -**  **Reporting of DMRs** A number of states authorized by EPA to implement the NPDES program have switched from paper to electronic collection of Discharge Monitoring Report s (DMR s). EPA has asked a number of states about the participation rate of NPDES regulated entities in the s tate’s electronic collection of DMRs as part of its regular set of calls with states. EPA has learned that migration to e - reporting of DMRs is not uniform across the states. EPA is aware of only two states (Ohio, West Virginia) that have mandated that NPDE S regulated entities submit their DMRs electronically . Below are the participation rates of NPDES regulated entities in the state’s electronic collection of DMRs. These are participation rates are preliminary and apply

to facilities individual permits th at are required to submit DMRs .  California

– 70% of all permittees designated as m ajors  Kansas

– 10% of all permittees designated as majors  Louisiana

– 10% of all permittees  Maine

– 85% of total  Massachusetts

– 35% of total  Mississippi

– 35% of total  North Carolina

– 2% of total  Ohio

– 100% of total  Virginia

– 40% of total  West Virginia

– 85% of total  Wyoming

– 90% of total Two states (New Jersey

and Vermont) have indicated they are not moving toward electronic reporting at this time. Thirteen states (Alaska, Arizona, Georgia, Iowa, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New York, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island and South Carolina) are in some stage of planning for electronic reporting.2

There is no information available on the territories, but only the Virgin Islands has received authority to administer the NPDES program. The other territories are under EPA permitting authority. T he remaining states and the District of Columbia have implemented some form of electronic reporting for DMRs. No adoption rate information is available for the other states at this time
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 05942

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 05942\05942_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05942\05942_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

05942\05942_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 05942\05942_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05942\05942_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05942\05942_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05942\05942_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05942\05942_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05942\05942_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

05942\Certification Statement_05942.pdf Plant certification statement

05942\Supporting Documentation\05942_A5-2 aerial maps.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05942\Supporting Documentation\05942_Cover Page.pdf Plant submitted survey file

x 05942\Supporting Documentation\05942_Part A Sect 8 for CT1 of SEU-A.pdf Plant submitted survey file

x 05942\Supporting Documentation\05942_Part A Sect 8 for CT2 of SEU-A.pdf Plant submitted survey file

x 05942\Supporting Documentation\05942_Part E.doc Technical Reviewer Notes

x 05942\Supporting Documentation\05942_PartA.pdf Plant submitted survey file

x 05942\Supporting Documentation\05942_PartB.pdf Plant submitted survey file

x 05942\Supporting Documentation\05942_PartC.pdf Plant submitted survey file

x 05942\Supporting Documentation\05942_PartD.pdf Plant submitted survey file

x 05942\Supporting Documentation\05942_PartE.pdf Plant submitted survey file

x 05942\Supporting Documentation\05942_PartH.pdf Plant submitted survey file

05942\Supporting Documentation\05942_Xmal Ltr. SIGNED.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x x 05942\Supporting Documentation\A5 - 3 Water Balance Diagrams.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.919 What in-service inspection requirements must I meet? ( a ) You must submit a comprehensive in-service inspection report annually by November 1 to the Regional Supervisor that must include: ( 1 ) A list of fixed and floating platforms you inspected in the preceding 12 months;
( 2 ) The extent and area of inspection for both the above-water and underwater portions of the platform and the pertinent components of the mooring system for floating platforms;
( 3 ) The type of inspection employed (e.g., visual, magnetic particle, ultrasonic testing);
( 4 ) The overall structural condition of each platform, including a corrosion protection evaluation; and
( 5 ) A summary of the inspection results indicating what repairs, if any, were needed.
( b ) If any of your structures have been exposed to a natural occurrence (e.g., hurricane, earthquake, or tropical storm), the Regional Supervisor may require you to submit an initial report of all structural damage, followed by subsequent updates, which include the following: ( 1 ) A list of affected structures;
( 2 ) A timetable for conducting the inspections described in section 14.4.3 of API RP 2A-WSD (as incorporated by reference in § 250.198); and
( 3 ) An inspection plan for each structure that describes the work you will perform to determine the condition of the structure.
( c ) The Regional Supervisor may also require you to submit the results of the inspections referred to in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, including a description of any detected damage that may adversely affect structural integrity, an assessment of the structure's ability to withstand any anticipated environmental conditions, and any remediation plans. Under §§ 250.900(b)(3) and 250.905, you must obtain approval from BSEE before you make major repairs of any damage unless you meet the requirements of § 250.900(c).
#### § 18.24 Electrical clearances.

Minimum clearances between uninsulated electrical conductor surfaces, or between uninsulated conductor surfaces and grounded metal surfaces, within the enclosure shall be as follows:

Minimum Clearances Between Uninsulated Surfaces

| Phase-to-Phase Voltage (rms) | Clearances (inches) | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Phase-to-Phase | Phase-to-Ground or Control Circuit |
| 0 to 250 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| 251 to 600 | 0.28 | 0.25 |
| 601 to 1000 | 0.61 | 0.25 |
| 1001 to 2400 | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| 2401 to 4160 | 3.0 | 1.4 |

[[57 FR 61209](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/57-FR-61209), Dec. 23, 1992]
### §1140. Information 1 individuals involved in accidents and families of such individuals

In the course of an investigation of an accident described in section 1131(a)(1), except an aircraft accident described in section 1136 or a rail passenger accident described in section 1139, the Board may, to the maximum extent practicable, ensure that individuals involved in accidents and the families of such individuals, and other individuals the Board deems appropriate—

(1) are informed as to the roles, with respect to the accident and the post-accident activities, of the Board;

(2) are briefed, before any public briefing, about the accident, its causes, and any other findings from the investigation; and

(3) are individually informed of and allowed to attend any public hearings and meetings of the Board about the accident.

(Added Pub. L. 115–254, div. C, §1109(e)(1), Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3435; amended Pub. L. 118–63, title XII, §1215(e), May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1430.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2024—Pub. L. 118–63 substituted "individuals involved in accidents and families of such individuals" for "for families of individuals involved in accidents" in section catchline and "individuals involved in accidents and the families of such individuals" for "the families of individuals involved in the accident" in introductory provisions in text.

1 So in original. Probably should be followed by "for".
<PAGE>   1


                                                                EXHIBIT 23


ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Response Oncology, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(No. 33-45616) on Form S-8, the Registration Statement (No. 33-21333) on
Form S-8 and the Registration Statement (No. 333-14371) on Form S-8 of
Response Oncology, Inc. of our report dated February 12, 1997, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Response Oncology, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three year period ended December 31, 1996 and the related financial statement
schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 1996 annual report on
Form 10-K of Response Oncology, Inc.


                                                KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Memphis, Tennessee
March 26, 1997
#### § 56.7010 Power failures.

In the event of power failure, drill controls shall be placed in the neutral position until power is restored.
### §213. Jurisdiction of confiscation proceedings

Such prizes and capture shall be condemned in the district court of the United States having jurisdiction of the amount, or in admiralty in any district in which the same may be seized, or into which they may be taken and proceedings first instituted.

(R.S. §5309; Feb. 27, 1877, ch. 69, §1, 19 Stat. 253; Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §291, 36 Stat. 1167.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §5309 derived from act Aug. 6, 1861, ch. 60, §2, 12 Stat. 319.

Act Mar. 3, 1911, conferred the powers and duties of the former circuit courts upon the district courts.

#### Amendments

1877—Act Feb. 27, 1877, inserted "may" after "any district in which the same".
#### § 56.12020 Protection of persons at switchgear.

Dry wooden platforms, insulating mats, or other electrically nonconductive material shall be kept in place at all switchboards and power-control switches where shock hazards exist. However, metal plates on which a person normally would stand and which are kept at the same potential as the grounded, metal, non-current-carrying parts of the power switches to be operated may be used.
#### § 56.19011 Drum flanges.

Flanges on drums shall extend radially a minimum of 4 inches or three rope diameters beyond the last wrap, whichever is the lesser.
Fw: could you please send me the RIA document you mentioned today which 

has the county info on ozone secondary standard ?

Ron Evans to: Thomas.Grahame 11/09/2009 01:38 PM

Cc: "King, Heidi R.", Amy Lamson, Tricia Crabtree

Tom, Amy forwarded your request to me. She has provided me with information you have requested 

which I am forwarding here. Please let us know if you have any questions based on this.

In the future, please send any requests you have about the RIAs thru me, I will make sure you get 

information you need. I realize this was a special request based on Amy's statement during the meeting, 

no harm done.

Ron Evans

Leader, Air Benefit & Cost Group

HEID/OAQPS/OAR/EPA

Mail Drop C-439-02

919-541-5488

919-541-0839 fax

Attached is the requested document. The relevant sections are S4-2 through S4-7.

----- Forwarded by Amy Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US on 11/09/2009 01:22 PM -----

From: "Grahame, Thomas" <Thomas.Grahame@HQ.DOE.GOV>

To: Amy Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 11/09/2009 01:13 PM

Subject: could you please send me the RIA document you mentioned today which has the county info on 

ozone secondary standard?

Amy, this would save me time, if you could do me the favor of sending me the document, and telling me 

where to look for the county info?

Thanks,

Tom

Thomas J. Grahame

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Ave., SW

Washington, DC 20585

202 586 7149 (voice)
202 586 7085 (fax)
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9441 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9441

    To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to reduce the maximum 
    interest rates for Federal Direct student loans, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 30, 2024

  Mr. Moskowitz (for himself and Mrs. Luna) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 
                               Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to reduce the maximum 
    interest rates for Federal Direct student loans, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Student Loan Interest Cap Act''.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF MAXIMUM INTEREST RATES FOR FEDERAL DIRECT STUDENT 
              LOANS.

    Section 455(b) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1087e(b)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (9) and (10) as paragraphs 
        (10) and (11), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (8) the following;
            ``(9) Interest rate provisions for new loans on or after 
        july 1, 2024.--
                    ``(A) Rate for fdsl, fdusl, and plus loans.--
                            ``(i) Notwithstanding the preceding 
                        paragraphs of this subsection, for a loan 
                        specified in clause (ii) for which the first 
                        disbursement is made on or after July 1, 2024, 
                        the applicable rate of interest shall not 
                        exceed 3 percent.
                            ``(ii) The loans specified in this clause 
                        are the following:
                                    ``(I) Federal Direct Stafford 
                                Loans.
                                    ``(II) Federal Direct Unsubsidized 
                                Stafford Loans.
                                    ``(III) Federal Direct PLUS Loans.
                    ``(B) Rate for consolidation loans.--
                Notwithstanding the preceding paragraphs of this 
                subsection, any Federal Direct Consolidation Loan for 
                which the application is received on or after July 1, 
                2024, shall bear interest at an annual rate of not more 
                than 3 percent on the unpaid principal balance of the 
                loan, regardless of the interest rates of the loans 
                consolidated by such Federal Direct Consolidation 
                Loan.''.
                                 <all>
```