alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dating Violence Reported by High 

School Students, 2017

Data collected by the CDC monitors the prevalence of youth behaviors that most influence health 

The prevalence of physical dating violence was greater for 

black students than white or Hispanic students in 2017

Physical dating violence Sexual dating violence

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

7.0%

10.2%

7.6%

6.9%

4.8%

6.9%

White, non−Hispanic

Black, non−Hispanic

Hispanic

Percentage of high school students reporting 

victimization in the past 12 months, 2017

High school seniors were more likely than freshmen or juniors 

to report physical dating violence in 2017 

Physical dating violence Sexual dating violence

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

9%

10%

7.0%

8.4%

6.8%

9.2%

6.6% 6.9% 6.7% 6.8%

9th

10th

11th

12th

Percentage of high school students reporting 

victimization in the past 12 months, 2017

The prevalence of physical and sexual dating violence 

reported by students declined between 2013 and 2017 

Physical dating violence Sexual dating violence

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

10.3%

9.6%

8.0%

10.4% 10.6%

6.9%

2013 2015 2017

Percentage of high school students reporting 

victimization in the past 12 months

Gay, lesbian, or bisexual students and those not sure of their 

sexual identity were more likely than heterosexual students to 

report physical or sexual dating violence in 2017

Physical dating violence Sexual dating violence

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

6.4%

17.2%

14.1%

5.5%

15.8%

14.1%

Percentage of high school students reporting 

victimization in the past 12 months, 2017

Heterosexual Not sure

Gay, lesbian, bisexual

High school females were more likely than males to report 

physical or sexual dating violence in 2017

Physical dating violence Sexual dating violence

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

6.5%

9.1%

2.8%

10.7%

Male Female

Percentage of high school students reporting 

victimization in the past 12 months, 2017

Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

Notes

Physical dating violence is defined in the Youth Risk Behavior Survey 

as being physically hurt on purpose (such as being hit, slammed into 

something, or injured with an object or weapon) by someone they 

were dating or going out with in the 12 months prior to the survey.

Sexual dating violence is defined in the survey as being forced to do 

sexual acts (such as kissing, touching, or being physically forced to 

have sexual intercourse) that they did not want to, by someone they 

were dating or going out with in the 12 months prior to the survey. 

Author: This publication was prepared by Charles Puzzanchera, National 

Center for Juvenile Justice, under cooperative agreement #2019-JX-FX-K001 

awarded by the National Institute of Justice with funding support from OJJDP. 

March 2020.

Data source: Analysis of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

(CDC), 1991-2017 High School Youth Risk Behavior Survey Data. Available at 

https://nccd.cdc.gov/youthonline.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1829

FRANKLIN LIVESTOCK, INC.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

J AND K CATTLE; KEVIN VAN BEEK; JAY LELOUX,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM VETMEDICA, INC.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:15-cv-00063-BO)

Submitted: April 25, 2018 Decided: May 2, 2018

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alan D. McInnes, Phillip A. Harris, Jr., KILPATRICK TOWNSEND, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellant. Kyle V. Miller, Michael E. McWilliams, BUTLER SNOW LLP, 

Ridgeland, Mississippi; Alex J. Hagan, Jeremy M. Falcone, ELLIS & WINTERS LLP, 
2

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Franklin Livestock, Inc., appeals the district court’s orders dismissing its lawsuit 

as a sanction for discovery abuses and denying its motion to alter or amend judgment. 

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s thorough and well-reasoned orders,

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Franklin Livestock, Inc. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc., No. 5:15-cv00063-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 18, 2017; June 15, 2017). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §1571. Legislature

#### (a) Designation and unicameral character

The legislative power and authority of the Virgin Islands shall be vested in a legislature, consisting of one house, to be designated the "Legislature of the Virgin Islands", herein referred to as the legislature.

#### (b) Composition; legislative districts; method of elections

The legislature shall be composed of members to be known as senators. The number of such senators shall be determined by the laws of the Virgin Islands. The apportionment of the legislature shall be as provided by the laws of the Virgin Islands: Provided, That such apportionment shall not deny to any person in the Virgin Islands the equal protection of the law: And provided further, That every voter in any district election or at large election shall be permitted to vote for the whole number of persons to be elected in that district election or at large election as the case may be. Until the legislature shall provide otherwise, four members shall be elected at large, five shall be elected from the District of Saint Thomas, five from the District of Saint Croix, and one from the District of Saint John, as those Districts were constituted on July 22, 1954,

(July 22, 1954, ch. 558, §5, 68 Stat. 498; Pub. L. 89–548, §1, Aug. 30, 1966, 80 Stat. 371; Pub. L. 106–364, §1, Oct. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 1408.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2000—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 106–364 struck out "fifteen" after "composed of" in first sentence and inserted "The number of such senators shall be determined by the laws of the Virgin Islands." after first sentence.

1966—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 89–548 raised from eleven to fifteen the total number of senators in the legislature, substituted provision that the legislature be apportioned according to the laws of the Virgin Islands for provisions spelling out the division of the Virgin Islands into districts, the composition of each such district, and the district and at-large representation breakdown of the senators in the legislature, struck out provision for the casting of a ballot for two candidates by each elector in at-large elections and the drawing of lots to determine placement on the ballot in at-large elections, prohibited apportionment in a way which would deny equal protection of the law, and provided for temporary apportionment until the legislature provided otherwise from the districts as constituted on July 22, 1954.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1966 Amendment

Pub. L. 89–548, §2, Aug. 30, 1966, 80 Stat. 371, provided that: "This Act [amending this section] shall be effective with respect to the legislature to be elected at the regular general election in November 1966, and thereafter."
§ 81.99 Additional provisions. ( a ) *Additional requirements.* In any case or any class of cases arising under these regulations, a GSE may require such additional evidence and a bond of indemnity, with or without surety, as may in the judgment of the GSE be necessary for the protection of the interests of the GSE.
( b ) *Notice of attachment for GSE Securities in Book-entry system.* The interest of a debtor in a Security Entitlement may be reached by a creditor only by legal process upon the Securities Intermediary with whom the debtor's securities account is maintained, except where a Security Entitlement is maintained in the name of a secured party, in which case the debtor's interest may be reached by legal process upon the secured party. These regulations do not purport to establish whether a Federal Reserve Bank is required to honor an order or other notice of attachment in any particular case or class of cases.
September 26, 2013

Mr. L esly S anchez L andron

URB Marina Bahia

RC 10 Ave. Putna Las Marias

C atano, PR 00962

- 6718

Dear Mr. Landron :

This is in response to your letter dated May 23, 2013 (public docket No. FAA

- 2013

- 0473) in which you petition the Federal Aviation Administration for an exemption from § 65.91(c)(5) of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). The relief you seek wo uld permit you to qualify to take the Inspection Authorization written test, without having met the requirement to hold a currently effective mechanic certificate with both an airframe rating and a powerplant rating, each of which is currently effective an d has been in effect for a total of at least 3 years. This requirement is found in § 65.91(c)(1).

On October 18, 2012, the FAA received a petition for exemption from Mr. Luis A. Irizarry, Aviation Consultant, petitioning on your behalf for the same relief. On November 26, 2012, the FAA responded to that request in Denial of Exemption No. 10663 (copy enclosed). In your recent letter, you incorrectly cite § 65.91(c)(5) which pertains to the requirement to pass the written test once you have fulfilled other eligibility requirements of § 65.91(c); namely paragraph (c)(1) of that section.

In reviewing your recent request, the FAA finds that our position has not changed. Further, while § 11.101 allows you to petition for reconsideration of a denial of petition, the request to reconsider must be made within 60 days after issuance of the denial and must show the following:

(1) That you have a significant additional fact, and why you did not present it in your original petition;

(2) That the FAA made an important factual error in its denial of your original petition; or

(3) That the FAA did not correctly interpret a law, regulation, or precedent.2 Since we did not receive your petition for reconsideration within the required 60 days, and your recent request failed t o meet any of the requirements of § 11.101, we will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/ Brenda D. Courtney Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT HUMBERTO R. CASTILLO, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-5281 ) BAYSIDE ENGINEERING, INC., ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed February 2, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Elizabeth G. Rice, Judge. Humberto R. Castillo, pro se. No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CRENSHAW, MORRIS, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FOR 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             210
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        2
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   652
<PP&E>                                             496
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (53)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,154
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,621
<BONDS>                                             21
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                       (498)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,154
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     8
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,415
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  11
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,418)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,418)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,418)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)
        

</TABLE>
SERVED: MAY 10, 2011 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

DIAMOND AIR CHARTER, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10EA0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2010-0620 

• liTMENT OF 

.SPORTAllOr-i 

8 

NOTICE OF PREHEARING CONFERENCE 

A Prehearing Telephone Conference is scheduled on June 1, 2011, at 3:00 p.m., Eastern 

Time. 

All parties should be prepared to discuss all issues and facts at issue. Each party shall 

ensure that the Judge receives, no later than May 20, 2011, a copy of each document that party 

has provided to the other party but not the Judge. 

Pursuant to Section 556 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 556(c)(8), each 

party shall be represented by someone who has authority to negotiate concerning resolution of all 

issues in controversy. 

SO ORDERED. 

"• Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law 

Attachment - Service List 
T 

FAA Docket No. CP10EA0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

REVISED SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & 0I P COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC'430 ,,, ,v 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2#1000' 

ONECOPV 

Gregory S. Winton, Respondent's Counsel 

Aviation Law Experts 

One Research Court, Suite 450 

Rockville, MD 20850 

TEL: 301-294-8550 

FAX: 301-294-2525 

Zachary M. Berman, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel, EAL-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3258 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, Room El 2-320 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2142 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by e«pe(j|bBd coiiuier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbui^li'ilght Building - Suite 2WI000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

- 2 -
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,728
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,414
<ALLOWANCES>                                       219
<INVENTORY>                                         78
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,000
<PP&E>                                             624
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,435
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,429
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,883
<OTHER-SE>                                     (28,585)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,435
<SALES>                                         20,165
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,165
<CGS>                                           17,223
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,223
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,370
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 163
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,591)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,591)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,591)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.67)


</TABLE>
pcct-ex102_25.htm



Exhibit 10.2

Execution Version

JOINDER AGREEMENT

TO

REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT

November 18, 2022

Karrie Willis (the “Joinder Party”) is executing and delivering this Joinder Agreement pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2021 (the “Registration Rights Agreement”), by and among Perception Capital Corp. II, a Cayman Islands exempted company (the “Company”), Perception Capital Partners II LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and each of the holders set forth on the signature pages thereto.  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Registration Rights Agreement.

The Joinder Party, a Permitted Transferee, has received Registrable Securities and wishes to become a party to the Registration Rights Agreement.

By executing this Joinder Agreement and delivering it to the Company, the Joinder Party hereby agrees to become a party to, to be bound by, and to comply with the provisions of the Registration Rights Agreement in the same manner as if the Joinder Party had been an original party thereto.

The Company hereby agrees that this Joinder Agreement shall constitute written notice of an assignment of rights under the Registration Rights Agreement to the Joinder Party, in a form reasonably satisfactory to the Company, pursuant to Section 5.2.5 thereof.

[Signature Page Follows]

 



 

 

Accordingly, the undersigned has executed and delivered this Joinder Agreement as of the date first above written.

/s/ Karrie Willis
Karrie Willis

 

 

Acknowledged and Agreed:

PERCEPTION CAPITAL CORP. II

 

By:/s/ Rick Gaenzle 

Name:Rick Gaenzle

Title:Chief Executive Officer

 

 

[Signature Page to RRA Joinder Agreement]
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-20-00138-CR

JAMES THOMAS SULLIVAN, JR.,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from County Criminal 

Court No. 10

of Tarrant County (A3053415)

June 24, 2021

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0001315 06-MAR-2015 08:25 AM
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3457 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3457

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for World War II 
 veterans to be in the same priority category for health care services 
    from the Department of Veterans Affairs as World War I veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2005

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for World War II 
 veterans to be in the same priority category for health care services 
    from the Department of Veterans Affairs as World War I veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRIORITY CATEGORY FOR DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS HEALTH 
              CARE SERVICES FOR WORLD WAR II VETERANS.

    Section 1710(a)(2)(E) of title 38, United States Code, is amended 
by inserting ``or World War II'' after ``World War I''.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1712 What information must I submit before I permanently plug a well or zone? Before you permanently plug a well or zone, you must submit form BSEE-0124, Application for Permit to Modify, to the appropriate District Manager and receive approval. A request for approval must contain the following information: ( a ) The reason you are plugging the well (or zone), for completions with production amounts specified by the Regional Supervisor, along with substantiating information demonstrating its lack of capacity for further profitable production of oil, gas, or sulfur;
( b ) Recent well test data and pressure data, if available;
( c ) Maximum possible surface pressure, and how it was determined;
( d ) Type and weight of well-control fluid you will use;
( e ) A description of the work;
( f ) A current and proposed well schematic and description that includes: ( 1 ) Well depth;
( 2 ) All perforated intervals that have not been plugged;
( 3 ) Casing and tubing depths and details;
( 4 ) Subsurface equipment;
( 5 ) Estimated tops of cement (and the basis of the estimate) in each casing annulus;
( 6 ) Plug locations;
( 7 ) Plug types;
( 8 ) Plug lengths;
( 9 ) Properties of mud and cement to be used;
( 10 ) Perforating and casing cutting plans;
( 11 ) Plug testing plans;
( 12 ) Casing removal (including information on explosives, if used);
( 13 ) Proposed casing removal depth; and
( 14 ) Your plans to protect archaeological and sensitive biological features, including anchor damage during plugging operations, a brief assessment of the environmental impacts of the plugging operations, and the procedures and mitigation measures you will take to minimize such impacts; and
( g ) Certification by a Registered Professional Engineer of the well abandonment design and procedures and that all plugs meet the requirements in the table in § 250.1715. In addition to the requirements of § 250.1715, the Registered Professional Engineer must also certify the design will include two independent barriers, one of which must be a mechanical barrier, in the center wellbore as described in § 250.420(b)(3). The Registered Professional Engineer must be registered in a State of the United States and have sufficient expertise and experience to perform the certification. You must submit this certification with your APM (Form BSEE-0124).
[76 FR 64462, Oct. 18, 2011, as amended at 77 FR 50900, Aug. 22, 2012]