alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 6 -00 763 -CR
Br ya n G . Ke lle y , A ppe lla nt

v . The State of Texas, App ellee FR OM T HE C OU N T Y C OU R T A T L A W N O. 1 OF T R A V IS C OU N T Y NO. 7206 61 , HO NORAB LE J. DAVID P HI LLIP S , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N Ap p el l ant’s motion to dism iss this appea l is gra nted. SeeT e x. R. Ap p . P. 42.2(a) . The a ppeal is dismissed.

________________________________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ David Puryear , J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Puryear and He nson Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: June 25, 2007 Do Not Publish
#### REISER v. METROPOLITAN EXPRESS CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 17, 1905.)

Action by M. Gustino Reiser against the Metropolitan Express Company. No opinion. Motion granted.
NOVUS Financial Corporation

Officer's Certificate - Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 1998-1

Pursuant  to Section  3.16 of the Pooling and  Servicing  Agreement  dated as of
March 1, 1998 (the  "Pooling and  Servicing  Agreement")  among NOVUS  Financial
Corporation,  as seller and servicer (referred to herein in such capacity as the
"Servicer"),  and Norwest Bank  Minnesota,  N.A., as trustee,  the  undersigned,
hereby states that:

       (1) A review of the  activities  of the Servicer  and of its  performance
under  the  Pooling  and  Servicing   Agreement  during  the  ten  month  period
terminating on the date of this Certificate, has been made under my supervision;
and

       (2) To the best of my knowledge,  based on such review,  the Servicer has
fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period.

NOVUS Financial Corporation
By
           J. A. Potter

Title Senior Vice President

Dated as of December 31, 1998
By
          R. F. Tegler

Title Vice President, Controller

Dated as of December 31, 1998
### [§14504. Repealed. Pub. L. 109–59, title IV, §4305(a), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1764; Pub. L. 110–53, title XV, §1537(a), Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 467]

Section, added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §103, Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 902; amended Pub. L. 110–53, title XV, §1537(a), Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 467, related to registration of motor carriers by a State.

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 11506 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 109–59, title IV, §4305(a), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1764, as amended by Pub. L. 110–53, title XV, §1537(c), Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 467, provided that this section and the item relating to this section in the analysis for this chapter are repealed effective Jan. 1, 2008.

#### Temporary Reenactment of Section

Pub. L. 110–53, title XV, §1537(a), Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 467, provided that section 14504 of this title, as in effect on Dec. 31, 2006, was to be in effect for the period beginning on Jan. 1, 2007, and ending on the earlier of Jan. 1, 2008, or the effective date of final regulations issued (none issued as of Jan. 1, 2008) pursuant to section 1537(b) of Pub. L. 110–53, set out as a note under section 13908 of this title.
Exhibit 23

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

 

The Board of DirectorsWLR Foods, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statementson Form S-8 (No. 33-63364 and No. 33-55649), on Form S-3 (No. 33-56775) and on Form S-3(D)(No. 33-54692) of WLR Foods, Inc. of our reports dated August 11, 2000, except fornote 17, which is as of September 27, 2000,  relating to the consolidated balancesheets of WLR Foods, Inc. and subsidiaries as of July 1, 2000 and July 3, 1999, and therelated consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flowsfor each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended July 1, 2000, and the relatedschedule, which reports appear in the July 1, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of WLRFoods, Inc.

 

 Richmond, VirginiaSeptember 29, 2000
§ 1290.103 Who may file an appeal? ( a ) If you receive an order that adversely affects you or your lessee, you may appeal that order except as provided under § 1290.104.
( b ) If you are a lessee and you receive a Notice of Order, and if you contest the order, you may either appeal the order or join in your designee's appeal under § 1290.106.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6384

JOHN H. TAYLOR,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS R. CORCORAN; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.

(CA-96-2687-JFM)

Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 17, 1997

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John H. Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Taylor v. Corcoran, No. CA-96-2687-JFM (D.

Md. Mar. 5, 1997) . We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,740
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,784
<ALLOWANCES>                                       149
<INVENTORY>                                         67
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,220
<PP&E>                                           3,099
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,973
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,346
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,651
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,172
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,532)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,346
<SALES>                                          4,555
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,555
<CGS>                                            3,862
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,862
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,704
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    30
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  11
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,052)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (45)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,007)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,007)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.16)
        

</TABLE>
### [§41910. Renumbered §41907]
### SUBCHAPTER I—PROLIFERATION SECURITY INITIATIVE
#### § 56.6904 Smoking and open flames.

Smoking and use of open flames shall not be permitted within 50 feet of explosive material except when separated by permanent noncombustible barriers. This standard does not apply to devices designed to ignite safety fuse or to heating devices which do not create a fire or explosion hazard.
### §1519a. Limitation on procurement of binary chemical weapons

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no funds may be obligated or expended after September 24, 1983, for the production of binary chemical weapons unless the President certifies to the Congress that for each 155-millimeter binary artillery shell or aircraft-delivered binary aerial bomb produced a serviceable unitary artillery shell from the existing arsenal shall be rendered permanently useless for military purposes.

(b)(1) Funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations for the Army in section 101 of this Act may be used for the establishment of a production base for binary chemical munitions and for the procurement of components for 155-millimeter binary chemical artillery projectiles, but such funds may not be used for the actual production of binary chemical munitions before October 1, 1985.

(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (1), before the production of binary chemical munitions may begin after September 30, 1985, the President must certify to Congress in writing that, in light of circumstances prevailing at the time the certification is made, the production of such munitions is essential to the national interest.

(3) For purposes of this subsection, "production of binary chemical munitions" means the final assembly of weapon components and the filling or loading of components with binary chemicals.

(Pub. L. 98–94, title XII, §1233, Sept. 24, 1983, 97 Stat. 695.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 101 of this Act, referred to in subsec. (b)(1), is section 101 of Pub. L. 98–94, title I, Sept. 24, 1983, 97 Stat. 618, which was not classified to the Code.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1984, and not as part of Pub. L. 91–121, title IV, §409, Nov. 19, 1969, 83 Stat. 209, which comprises this chapter.
§ 57.4502 Battery-charging stations. ( a ) Battery-charging stations shall be ventilated with a sufficient volume of air to prevent the accumulation of hydrogen gas.
( b ) Smoking, use of open flames, or other activities that could create an ignition source shall be prohibited at the battery charging station during battery charging.
( c ) Readily visible signs prohibiting smoking or open flames shall be posted at battery-charging stations during battery charging.
#### § 57.19080 Hoisting tools, timbers, and other materials.

When tools, timbers, or other materials are being lowered or raised in a shaft by means of a bucket, skip, or cage, they shall be secured or so placed that they will not strike the sides of the shaft.
### §1704. Authority to issue regulations

The President may issue such regulations, including regulations prescribing definitions, as may be necessary for the exercise of the authorities granted by this chapter.

(Pub. L. 95–223, title II, §205, Dec. 28, 1977, 91 Stat. 1628.)
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Island Life Chiropractic, P.C., as Assignee of Miracle, Farah, Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>Omni Indemnity Company, Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell, Esq.), for appellant.Freiberg, Peck &amp; Kang, LLP (Yilo J. Kang, Esq.), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Larry Love, J.), entered August 8, 2014. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that defendant had not issued an insurance policy covering the subject loss and, thus, that plaintiff had sued the wrong party.</p><p>For the reasons stated in <a href="../2015/2015_51294.htm" target="_blank"><i>TAM Med. Supply Corp. v Omni Indem. Co.</i> (48 Misc 3d 142</a>[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 51294[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2015]), the order is affirmed.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA AND SOLOMON, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: September 22, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
EXHIBIT 10.1
                                  ------------

                   Amendment To Executive Employment Agreement


Effective as of November 12, 2002 the Management Agreement between International
Microcomputer Software, Inc., a California corporation, ("IMSI") and Martin R.
Wade, Chief Executive Officer of IMSI, ("Executive") dated April 27, 2002
("Agreement") is hereby amended as follows:

1.  Paragraph 5(a) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety.

2.  Executive and IMSI hereby agree to the full and complete cancellation of the
May 20, 2002, grant to Executive of 2 million warrants. Executive and IMSI agree
that any and all warrant and/or option grants made to Executive to date, as well
as all documentation reflecting such grants are null and void and of no further
effect.  Executive agrees to surrender any and all documents relating to such
grants upon the request of IMSI.

3.  A new Paragraph 5(a) is hereby added to the Agreement to read as follows:

"Upon the sale or merger of the Company, or acquisition of at least fifty one
percent (51%) of the Company's common stock by a single corporate entity
(excluding the ownership of existing stockholders), while Executive is employed
as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, the Company shall pay Executive the
following: (1.75%) of the total amount of the transaction for any transaction of
at least  $1.25 per net share; and 7.5% of the amount of the transaction over
$1.25 per net share.  Payment shall be made on the same basis as it is made to
the common shareholders of IMSI.

All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain as originally
written and are hereby reaffirmed.

ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:

IMSI
By: /s/ Bruce Galloway
Bruce Galloway
Director & Chairman of the Board of Directors



By: /s/ Martin Wade, III
Martin Wade, III
Director & Chief Executive Officer



                                       24
<PAGE>
§ 990.135 Eligible unit months (EUMs). ( a ) A PHA's total number of EUMs will be calculated for the 12-month period from July 1st to June 30th that is prior to the first day of the applicable funding period, and will consist of eligible units as defined in § 990.140, § 990.145, or § 990.150.
( b ) ( 1 ) The determination of whether a public housing unit satisfies the requirements of § 990.140, § 990.145, or § 990.150 for any unit month shall be based on the unit's status as of either the first or last day of the month, as determined by the PHA.
( 2 ) HUD reserves the right to determine the status of any and all public housing units based on information in its information systems.
( c ) The PHA shall maintain and, at HUD's request, shall make available to HUD, specific documentation of the status of all units, including, but not limited to, a listing of the units, street addresses or physical address, and project/management control numbers.
( d ) Any unit months that do not meet the requirements of this subpart are not eligible for operating subsidy, and will not be subsidized by the Operating Fund.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 98-1289EM

_____________

Verna Martin, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

St. Louis University, doing business as * District of Missouri.

St. Louis University Health Sciences *

Center, doing business as St. Louis * [UNPUBLISHED]

University Medical Center, *

*

Appellee. *

_____________

 Submitted: October 6, 1998

Filed: October 8, 1998 

_____________

Before FAGG, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Verna Martin appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in

Martin's employment discrimination lawsuit. Having carefully reviewed the record and

the parties' briefs, we conclude the district court's judgment was correct and affirm

without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3211 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on +-bromo-+-nitrostyrene. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 12, 2005 

Mr. BUYER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on +-bromo- 

+-nitrostyrene. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. +-BROMO-+-NITROSTYRENE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.32.92 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 +-bromo-+-nitrostyrene) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

7 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 3211 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.11
 VOTING AGREEMENT
       Article I.
VOTING OF COMMON STOCK
 Section 1.1 Increase in Ownership.




---



##### 



Section 1.2 Voting Agreement
 Section 1.3 Grant of Proxy with Respect to Additional Common Stock.
   Section 1.4 Restrictions on Certain Actions.
  2




---



##### 



Article II.
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
 Section 2.1 Representations and Warranties of the Group.
 Due Organization, Authorization, etc.
 No Conflicts, Required Filings and Consents
  3




---



##### 



Title to Common Stock
 Tax Representations
     4




---



##### 



Section 2.2 Representations and Warranties of Cedar
 Due Organization, Authorization, etc.
 No Conflicts, Required Filings and Consents
   5




---



##### 



Article III.
MISCELLANEOUS
 Section 3.1 Expenses.
 Section 3.2 Notices.
 (i)
    
    if to Cedar to:Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc.
44 South Bayles Avenue
Port Washington, NY 11050
Attention: Leo S. Ullman
Fax: (516) 767-6497with a copy to:Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP
180 Maiden Lane
New York, NY 10038
Attention: Martin H. Neidell
Fax: (212) 806-7836(ii)
    
    if to the Group or Inland to:Inland Investment Advisors, Inc.
2901 Butterfield Road
Oak Brook, IL 60523
Attention: Roberta Matlin
Fax: (630)-218-4955with a copy to:Shefsky and Froelich Ltd.
111 East Wacker Drive, Suite 2800
Chicago, IL 60601
Attention: Michael Choate
Fax: (312) 275-7554
  6




---



##### 



Section 3.3 Termination. provided
 Section 3.4 No Inconsistent Actions by the Group or Cedar.
 Section 3.5 Amendment.
 Section 3.6 Governing Law
 Section 3.7 Severability.
 Section 3.8 Entire Agreement; Assignment.
 Section 3.9 Parties in Interest.
 7




---



##### 



Section 3.10 Specific Performance.
 Section 3.11 Waiver of Jury Trial.
 Section 3.12 Headings.
 Section 3.13 Mutual Drafting.
 Section 3.14 Counterparts
 8




---



##### 



Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc.By:
    /s/ LEO S. ULLMANName:
    Leo S. UllmanTitle:
    PresidentInland American Real Estate Trust, Inc.By:
    /s/ BRENDA GAY GUJRALName:
    Brenda Gay GujralTitle:
    PresidentInland Investment Advisors, Inc.By:
    /s/ ROBERTA S. MATLINName:
    Roberta S. MatlinTitle:
    PresidentInland Real Estate Investment CorporationBy:
    /s/ ROBERT D. PARKSName:
    Robert D. ParksTitle:
    ChairmanThe Inland Group, Inc.By:
    /s/ DAN GOODWINName:Title: 9
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

HARLIE RENAE QUINTAVALLE,

Appellant,

v.

NICHOLAS R. ROCKWOOD,

Appellee.

No. 4D23-947

[August 3, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Dina Keever-Agrama, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2021-DR008819-XXXXNB.

Nicole McNamara Quattrocchi of The Quatro Firm, West Palm Beach, 

for appellant.

Jack B. Pugh of Pugh & Associates, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
M. P. No. 77-6.

#### Rhode Island CATV Corporation *v.*Archie Smith *et al.*

*Dennis J. Roberts II,*for petitioner.

*Harold W. Demopulos,*for Newport Cable TV, Inc.

*Tobin, LeRoy & Silverstein, Max Wistow, Merrill W. Sherman,*for Plantations CATV Co., Inc.

*George C. Berk,*for Cable Television of Rhode Island, Inc.

*Charles J. McGovern,*for Vision Cable Company of Rhode Island, Inc.

Petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the writ shall issue forthwith.
#### § 57.10004 Brakes.

Positive-action-type brakes and devices which apply the brakes automatically in the event of a power failure shall be provided on aerial tramways.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,052
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,417
<ALLOWANCES>                                       370
<INVENTORY>                                     74,914
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,641
<PP&E>                                          19,975
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 144,865
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,228
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      78,177
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   144,865
<SALES>                                        120,261
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               120,261
<CGS>                                           76,380
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,084
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   356
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,197
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    244
<INCOME-TAX>                                        97
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                147
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       147
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02


</TABLE>
#### § 556.709 What if I want to transfer my record title interest in one lease to multiple parties?

You may transfer your record title interest in one lease to multiple parties using the same instrument. That instrument must be submitted in duplicate originals, accompanied by a cover letter executed by one of the parties to the transfer (or an authorized agent thereof). In such a multiple transfer of interests using a single instrument, a separate fee applies to each individual transfer of interest, and evidence of payment via *pay.gov* must accompany the instrument.