alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### [§§24401 to 24408. Renumbered §§22901 to 22908]
§ 56.18002 Examination of working places. ( a ) A competent person designated by the operator shall examine each working place at least once each shift before miners begin work in that place, for conditions that may adversely affect safety or health. ( 1 ) The operator shall promptly notify miners in any affected areas of any conditions found that may adversely affect safety or health and promptly initiate appropriate action to correct such conditions.
( 2 ) Conditions noted by the person conducting the examination that may present an imminent danger shall be brought to the immediate attention of the operator who shall withdraw all persons from the area affected (except persons referred to in section 104(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977) until the danger is abated.
( b ) A record of each examination shall be made before the end of the shift for which the examination was conducted. The record shall contain the name of the person conducting the examination; date of the examination; location of all areas examined; and description of each condition found that may adversely affect the safety or health of miners.
( c ) When a condition that may adversely affect safety or health is corrected, the examination record shall include, or be supplemented to include, the date of the corrective action.
( d ) The operator shall maintain the examination records for at least one year, make the records available for inspection by authorized representatives of the Secretary and the representatives of miners, and provide these representatives a copy on request.
[84 FR 51401, Sept. 30, 2019]
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Board of Directors

MAI Systems Corporation

Lake Forest, California

 

The audit referred to in our report dated April 25, 2005 relatingto the consolidated financial statements of MAI Systems Corporation, ,which isincorporated in Item 8 of the Form 10-K by reference to the annual reportto stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2004 included the audit ofthe financial statement schedule listed as Exhibit 23.3. Thisfinancial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company’smanagement. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this 2004 financialstatement schedule based upon our audit.

 

In our opinion such financialstatement schedule presents fairly, in all material respects, the informationset forth therein.

 

 
|                   | /s/ BDO Seidman LLP |   |
|------------------------|---------------------|--------|
|                   |
| Costa Mesa, California |
| April 25, 2005    |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE FORM 10-QSB OF BRILLIANT DIGITAL
ENTERTAINMENT,  INC.  TO WHICH THIS  EXHIBIT IS A PART AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  (IN  THOUSANDS,  EXCEPT PER
SHARE DATA).
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                 0001022844             
<NAME>                BRILLIANT DIGITAL ENTERTAINMENT
       
<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               5,353
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1,976
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                            113  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     7,596
<PP&E>                                                 837
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      10,241
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                1,553
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 9
<OTHER-SE>                                           8,525
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        10,241
<SALES>                                                207
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       207
<CGS>                                                  390
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        6,924
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (6,312)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           (19)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (6,331)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (6,331)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.67)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         101,224
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  334,518
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (9,700)
<INVENTORY>                                      8,126
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               482,140
<PP&E>                                       1,113,831
<DEPRECIATION>                               (747,758)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 921,621
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          381,522
<BONDS>                                         15,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        77,647
<OTHER-SE>                                     200,437
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   921,621
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,147,989
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,129,835
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   849
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,918
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,305
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,047
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,258
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,258
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40


</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROMEO RAMIREZ-GARCIA,

 Petitioner,

v. 

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-72911

Agency No. A012-519-653

ORDER*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued November 2, 2009

Submitted December 16, 2013

San Francisco, California

BEFORE: CANBY, GRABER and RAWLINSON,** Circuit Judges.

The unopposed petition for review in this case is granted, and the order of

removal of petitioner is vacated. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMOVAL ORDER VACATED.

FILED

DEC 24 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 

** Judge Rawlinson was drawn to replace Judge B. Fletcher. She has read

the briefs, reviewed the record and listened to the audio of the oral argument.
#### § 57.14207 Parking procedures for unattended equipment.

Mobile equipment shall not be left unattended unless the controls are placed in the park position and the parking brake, if provided, is set. When parked on a grade, the wheels or tracks of mobile equipment shall be either chocked or turned into a bank or rib.
#### Jenkins *vs.*Harris, executor.

■ [ Wahnisr, Chief Justice, being engaged in presiding over the senate organized as a court of impeachment, did not sit in this case.]

Where the bill alleged that complainant bought from defendant’s testator certain lands at a certain price, and gave a mortgage to secure the purchase money, which was foreclosed and judgment'had on the mortgage and general judgment on the notes, and that various ■ credits should be entered on said judgments, some for moneys paid before, and other credits for money paid since judgment, and that •complainant was entitled to set off a certain sum as legatee under >the will of the testator, and where the answer denied the credits and all other allegations in the bill, and depositions were read, some sustaining the bill and others the answer, and iho will showed only % trifling legacy to complainant, and where the only excuse for not making defense to the cause before judgment is sworn off in the answer, and an agreement in writing in regard to the judgment since its rendition is exhibited contrary to the allegation that the credits would pay off the real debt due on the judgment, and the whole aspect of the case made shows gross laches and little, if any, equity in the complainant:

*Held,*that the chancellor was right to refuse the injunction to stay execution levied on the lands for balance of purchase money, though there may have been slight irregularity in the petition and rule *nisi*to foreclose the mortgage.

•Jackson, Justice.
#### Nicholas A. Karger, Respondent, v. Pierre F. Nesi, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Order, dated May 17, 1960, denying application to vacate the order of arrest, unanimously affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9377 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9377

To amend the Omnibus Consolidated Rescissions and Appropriations Act of 
 1996 to remove the limit on the number of public housing agencies the 
  Secretary of Housing and Urban Development may add to the moving to 
                      work demonstration program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 16, 2024

   Mr. Ryan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Omnibus Consolidated Rescissions and Appropriations Act of 
 1996 to remove the limit on the number of public housing agencies the 
  Secretary of Housing and Urban Development may add to the moving to 
                      work demonstration program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Deliver Housing Now Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF LIMIT ON NUMBER OF PUBLIC HOUSING AGENCIES THAT MAY 
              BE ADDED TO MOVING TO WORK DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.

    Section 204(b) of the Omnibus Consolidated Rescissions and 
Appropriations Act of 1996 (42 U.S.C. 1437f note) is amended by 
striking ``up to 30'' and inserting ``not less than 15''.
                                 <all>
```
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Reporting of errors and changesin large-break loss-of-coolant accident evaluation models of fuel vendors andcompliance with 10 CFR 50.46(a)(3) [electronic resource].**
 
Notice 97-15 | Supplement 1
 
SuDoc Number:Y 3.N 88:56-2/97-15
Item Number:1051-H-08 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000754126
 
August 13, 2019
#### Henry Ott, Appellant, v. Jack F. Harrington et al., Respondents.

Appeal dismissed for failure to comply with previous order, without costs.
#### § 560.212 How does BOEM assign and monitor royalty suspension volumes for eligible leases?

(a) We have specified the water depth category for each eligible lease in the final Notice of OCS Lease Sale Package. The Final Notice of Sale is published in the Federal Register and the complete Final Notice of OCS Lease Sale Package is available on the BOEM Web site. Our determination of water depth for each lease became final when we issued the lease.

(b) We have specified in the Notice of OCS Lease Sale the royalty suspension volume applicable to each water depth. The following table shows the royalty suspension volumes for each eligible lease in million barrels of oil equivalent (MMBOE):

| Water depth | Minimum royalty suspension volume |
| --- | --- |
| (1) 200 to less than 400 meters | 17.5 MMBOE. |
| (2) 400 to less than 800 meters | 52.5 MMBOE. |
| (3) 800 meters or more | 87.5 MMBOE. |

[76 FR 64623, Oct. 18, 2011. Redesignated at 81 FR 18175, Mar. 30, 2016]
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MIGUEL A. BARRIOS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-3174

[November 30, 2017]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Charles E. Burton, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 2015CF011528AXX.

Roberto D. Stanziale of Roberto Stanziale P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, MAY and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
130 STAT. 1004 PUBLIC LAW 114–253—DEC. 8, 2016 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 2754 (H.R. 5011): 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 114–773 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure) accompanying H.R. 5011. 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

Sept. 15, considered and passed Senate. 

Sept. 26, considered and passed House, amended. 

Nov. 17, Senate concurred in House amendments. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–253 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 300 

Fannin Street in Shreveport, Louisiana, as the ‘‘Tom Stagg United States Court 

House’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The Federal building and United States courthouse located 

at 300 Fannin Street in Shreveport, Louisiana, shall be known 

and designated as the ‘‘Tom Stagg United States Court House’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the Federal building and 

United States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

to be a reference to the ‘‘Tom Stagg United States Court House’’. 

Approved December 8, 2016. 

Dec. 8, 2016 

[S. 2754] 


kgrant on DSKB33CYQ1 with PUBLAW
```

[115th Congress Public Law 8]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 131 STAT. 15]]

Public Law 115-8
115th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Social Security 
   Administration relating to Implementation of the NICS Improvement 
   Amendments Act of 2007. <<NOTE: Feb. 28, 2017 -  [H.J. Res. 40]>> 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Social Security Administration relating to 
Implementation of the NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007 (published 
at 81 Fed. Reg. 91702 (December 19, 2016)), and such rule shall have no 
force or effect.

    Approved February 28, 2017.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res. 40:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017):
            Feb. 2, considered and passed House.
            Feb. 14, 15, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
### §48106. Airway science curriculum grants

Amounts are available from the Airport and Airway Trust Fund established under section 9502 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 9502) to carry out section 44510 1 of this title. The amounts remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1296.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 48106 | 49 App.:1354a (2d sentence). | Nov. 5, 1990, Pub. L. 101–516, (2d sentence in par. under heading "Facilities and Equipment"), 104 Stat. 2160. |
| | | Oct. 28, 1991, Pub. L. 102–143, (2d sentence in par. under heading "Facilities and Equipment"), 105 Stat. 922. |
| | | Oct. 6, 1992, Pub. L. 102–388, (2d sentence in par. under heading "Facilities and Equipment"), 106 Stat. 1526. |

Section

This section is substituted for the source provisions for clarity and because of the restatement.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 44510 of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 118–63, title IV, §401(a), May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1148.

1 See References in Text note below.
#### §§ 285.804-285.809 [Reserved]
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:FAA-2011-0472; Dir ID 2011-NM-005-AD
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.5


                                       October 10, 2002

Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services Inc.
Ladenburg Capital Management Inc.
590 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor
New York, New York  10022

                                       RE:  EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

Gentlemen:

         Reference is made to my Employment Agreement, dated as of August 24,
1999, as amended, with Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services Inc. ("LTS") and
Ladenburg Capital Management Inc. In light of the current financial condition of
LTS and its subsidiaries, I hereby waive, for the period September 1, 2002 to
December 31, 2002, 25% of any payments due to me for such period under LTS's
Special Performance Incentive Plan (the "Plan") and agree that such waiver shall
not be deemed to be Reason under the Agreement with respect to any payment due
to me under the Plan for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2002.

                                             Sincerely,

                                             /s/ Mark Zeitchick

                                             Mark Zeitcheck

Acknowledged and agreed this
10th day of October, 2002

Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services Inc.


By: /s/ SALVATORE GIARDINA
    -----------------------------
Ladenburg Capital Management Inc.


By: /s/ RICHARD ROSENSTOCK
    -----------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 93 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 93

To require a particular jury instruction in Federal civil actions that 
   include a claim for damages based on negligence arising from the 
                        transmission of COVID19.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2023

  Mr. Biggs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require a particular jury instruction in Federal civil actions that 
   include a claim for damages based on negligence arising from the 
                        transmission of COVID19.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Businesses From Frivolous 
COVID Lawsuits Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. JURY INSTRUCTION IN FEDERAL CIVIL ACTIONS THAT INCLUDE A CLAIM 
              ALLEGING NEGLIGENCE ARISING FROM THE TRANSMISSION OF 
              COVID-19.

    In a Federal civil action that includes a claim alleging negligence 
arising from the transmission of COVID-19 and a request for damages, 
the court shall instruct a jury that--
            (1) the liability standard is the reasonable person 
        standard,
            (2) a person is negligent if the person either does 
        something that a reasonably careful person would not do in the 
        same situation, or fails to do something that a reasonably 
        careful person would do, in the same situation,
            (3) the act of opening a business, by itself, shall be 
        considered to be reasonable as a matter of law, and
            (4) the negligence may not be found solely on the basis of 
        holding oneself open for business.
                                 <all>
```