alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 203.82 What is BSEE's authority to collect this information? The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved the information collection requirements in part 203 under 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.,* and assigned OMB control number 1010-0071. ( a ) We use the information to determine whether royalty relief will result in production that wouldn't otherwise occur. We rely largely on your information to make these determinations. ( 1 ) Your application for royalty relief must contain enough information on finances, economics, reservoirs, G&G characteristics, production, and engineering estimates for us to determine whether: ( i ) We should grant relief under the law, and
( ii ) The requested relief will ultimately recover more resources and return a reasonable profit on project investments.
( 2 ) Your fabricator confirmation and post-production development reports must contain enough information for us to verify that your application reasonably represented your plans.
( b ) Applicants (respondents) are Federal OCS oil and gas lessees. Applications are required to obtain or retain a benefit. Therefore, if you apply for royalty relief, you must provide this information. We will protect information considered proprietary under applicable law and under regulations at § 203.63 and 30 CFR part 250.
( c ) The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 requires us to inform you that we may not conduct or sponsor, and you are not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
( d ) Send comments regarding any aspect of the collection of information under this part, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, 45600 Woodland Road, Sterling, VA 20166.
[76 FR 64462, Oct. 18, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 36148, June 6, 2016]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-29-2000
<CASH>                                           2,892
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,199
<ALLOWANCES>                                       388
<INVENTORY>                                     84,769
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               110,215
<PP&E>                                          27,515
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 166,043
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,915
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,320
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,473
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   166,043
<SALES>                                         72,790
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           46,590
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,080
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   268
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 840
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     12
<INCOME-TAX>                                         6
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  6
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         6
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
## SUBTITLE VIII—PIPELINES

Chapter
Sec.
601.
Safety
60101
603.
User Fees
60301
605.
Interstate Commerce Regulation
60501
#### § 56.18014 Emergency medical assistance and transportation.

Arrangements shall be made in advance for obtaining emergency medical assistance and transportation for injured persons.
COVID-19 Guidance for Dental Practitioners

OSHA is committed to protecting the health and safety of America’s workers and workplaces during 

these unprecedented times. The agency will be issuing a series of industry-specific alerts designed to 

help keep workers safe.

If you are a dental practitioner, the following tips can help reduce the risk of exposure to 

the coronavirus:

 Encourage workers to stay home if sick. 

 Maximize use of telemedicine for non-emergency consultations, and prioritize urgent and 

emergency procedures.

 Install physical barriers or partitions between patient treatment areas.

 Provide adequate ventilation and airflow in patient treatment areas so that air moves away from 

staff work areas. 

 Frequently clean and disinfect surfaces and equipment with hospital-grade Environmental 

Protection Agency-approved cleaning chemicals from List N that have label claims against the 

coronavirus.

 Minimize the number of staff present when aerosol-generating procedures are performed, and 

ensure staff who are present are appropriately protected.

 Provide appropriate personal protective equipment, such as eye goggles, face shields, and N95 

respirators, as necessary to protect dental practitioners and support personnel.

 Encourage workers to report any safety and health concerns.

For more information, visit www.osha.gov/coronavirus or call 1-800-321-OSHA (6742). Visit this link

for more detailed guidance for dental industry workers.

OSHA issues alerts to draw attention to 

worker safety and health issues and solutions.

 • osha.gov/coronavirus • 1-800-321-OSHA (6742) • @OSHA_DOL

OSHA 4019-05 2020
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 936 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax 

on indoor tanning services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2023 

Mrs. MILLER of West Virginia (for herself, Mr. FERGUSON, and Mr. BARR) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the excise tax on indoor tanning services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tanning Tax Repeal 

5 Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EXCISE TAX ON INDOOR TANNING 

7 SERVICES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle D of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 is amended by striking chapter 49 and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 936 IH

1 by striking the item relating to such chapter in the table 

2 of chapters of such subtitle. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall apply to services performed after the 

5 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Knieriemen Oil Company et al., Appellants, v. Robert A. Lane, as Building Inspector of the Town of Poughkeepsie, et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act: (1) to annul determinations of the respondent Building Inspector and of the respondent Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Poughkeepsie denying petitioners’ application for a variance to permit the construction and maintenance of fuel storage tanks; (2) to declare illegal the 1956 amended Town Zoning Ordinance and Building Inspection Ordinance; and (3) for other relief, petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated June 14, 1963, which denied their motion “for leave to renew and .reargue” their petition as amended. Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs and "disbursements. No new or additional facts were presented in the affidavit submitted in support of the motion; therefore it was in fact one for reargument of the prior application. An order denying a motion for reargument is not appealable *(Sellet*v. *City of Yonkers,*13 A D 2d 976; *Leakey*v. *MeQuade,*13 A D 2d 682; *Polito*v. *Town of Babylon,*5 A D 2d 877). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                       4,239,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,396,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   380,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,423,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,941,000
<PP&E>                                      19,278,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,215,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,219,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,503,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,269,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,219,000
<SALES>                                     16,287,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,287,000
<CGS>                                        7,816,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,816,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,934,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,333,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,333,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,333,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.14)
        

</TABLE>
§ 550.284 How will BOEM require revisions to the approved EP, DPP, or DOCD? ( a ) *Periodic review.* The Regional Supervisor will periodically review the activities you conduct under your approved EP, DPP, or DOCD and may require you to submit updated information on your activities. The frequency and extent of this review will be based on the significance of any changes in available information and onshore or offshore conditions affecting, or affected by, the activities in your approved EP, DPP, or DOCD.
( b ) *Results of review.* The Regional Supervisor may require you to revise your approved EP, DPP, or DOCD based on this review. In such cases, the Regional Supervisor will inform you of the reasons for the decision.
#### § 57.12071 Movement or operation of equipment near high-voltage powerlines.

When equipment must be moved or operated near energized high-voltage powerlines (other than trolley lines) and the clearance is less than 10 feet, the lines shall be deenergized or other precautionary measures shall be taken.
§ 1227.201 What standards must a State comply with for performing delegated functions? ( a ) If ONRR delegates royalty management functions to you, you must comply with the *Standards.* The *Standards* explain how you must carry out the activities under each of the delegable functions.
( b ) Your delegation agreement may include additional standards specifically applicable to the functions delegated to you.
( c ) Failure to comply with your delegation agreement, the *Standards,* or any of the specific standards and requirements in the delegation agreement, is grounds for termination of all or part of your delegation agreement, or other actions as provided under §§ 1227.801 and 227.802.
( d ) ONRR may revise the *Standards* and will provide notice of those changes in the Federal Register. You must comply with any changes to the *Standards.*
[62 FR 43084, Aug. 12, 1997, as amended at 75 FR 61087, Oct. 4, 2010]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3286 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3286

   To suspend temporarily the duty on pro-jet black 820 liquid feed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 14, 2005

  Mr. Castle introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on pro-jet black 820 liquid feed.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRO-JET BLACK 820 LIQUID FEED.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.13.02       Substituted        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         naphthalene                                                        31/2008
                         [[substituted
                         pyridinyl azo]
                         alkoxyphenyl
                         azo]azo,
                         potassium /
                         sodium salt (PMN
                         No. P04-390)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3204.14.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information primarily extracted from
Capita Preferred Trust's unaudited consolidated income statement and balance
sheet as of and for the six months ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such unaudited consolidated financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0<F2>
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             206,186
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0<F2>
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,186
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                200,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               206,186
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,340
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,340
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          9,340
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,340
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0
        


<FN>
*     In accordance with Regulation S-K item 601(c) 2, inapplicable or
      immaterial financial data is reflected as zero value.

<F1>  Accumulated depreciation relates to equipment under operating leases.

<F2>  This item is not applicable since the Company does not prepare a
      classified balance sheet.
</FN>



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21


                           LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

     The Partnership is a partner of the following joint ventures:
JMB/Piper Jaffray Tower Associates, a general partnership, which is a
partner in (i) OB Joint Venture II, a general partnership, which is a
partner of 222 South Ninth Street Limited Partnership, a limited partner-
ship, which holds title to the Piper Jaffray Tower office building in
Minneapolis, Minnesota, and (ii) OB Joint Venture, a general partnership,
which holds title to the land underlying the Piper Jaffray Tower office
building; JMB/Piper Jaffray Tower Associates II, a general partnership
which also is a partner in OB Joint Venture, a general partnership, which
holds title to the land underlying the Piper Jaffray Tower office building;
900 3rd Avenue Associates, a general partnership, which is a partner of
Progress Partners, a general partnership, which holds title to 900 Third
Avenue Building located in New York, New York; Maguire Thomas Partners -
South Tower, a limited liability company, which holds title to Wells Fargo
Center - IBM Tower located in Los Angeles, California; 260 Franklin Street
Associates, a general partnership, which holds title to the 260 Franklin
Street Building located in Boston, Massachusetts; C-C California Plaza
Partnership, a general partnership, which holds title to the California
Plaza office building in Walnut Creek, California; and JMB/NewPark
Associates, a general partnership, which is a partner in NewPark
Associates, a general partnership, which holds title to the NewPark Mall in
Newark, California.  Reference is made to the Notes for a description of
the terms of such venture partnerships.
Exhibit 99.1

 

March 5, 2007

 

Bruce Broquet, (907) 868-6660; bbroquet@gci.com

David Morris, (907) 868-5396; dmorris@gci.com

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 

Verizon sells 1.3 Million GCI Class B Common Shares

 

ANCHORAGE, AK -- General Communication, Inc. (NASDAQ: GNCMA) (“GCI”) announced today that John Stanton and Terry Gillespie, two of America’s most respected wireless entrepreneurs, have agreed to purchase approximately 1.3 million GCI Class B Common Shares from Verizon Communications, Inc. in a private transaction.  The Class B shares represent a 15.25 percent voting interest in GCI.

 

“We are pleased to announce this transaction with John Stanton,” said Ron Duncan, GCI president and CEO.”  “John has been a good friend for many years and we are pleased that he has acquired such a significant interest in GCI.”

 

“The Verizon divesture was expected and has no impact on the Company’s business relationship with Verizon.  In addition, the two officers and employees of Verizon currently on our board will continue to serve as directors of GCI.” 

 

GCI is the largest Alaska-based and operated integrated telecommunications provider. A pioneer in bundled services, GCI provides local, wireless, and long distance telephone, cable television, Internet and data communication services.  More information about the company can be found at www.gci.com.
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of Photogen Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for theperiod ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Taffy J. Williams, Ph.D.,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company

 

 
| /s/  Taffy J. Williams |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
| Taffy J.  Williams, Ph.D.   |
| Chief  Executive Officer    |
| May 12, 2003                |

 

----
### SUBCHAPTER IV—TRANSITION PROVISIONS
##### 



AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO THE
2005 CEDAR SHOPPING CENTERS, INC.
DEFERRED
 COMPENSATION PLAN
     1.
    
    The following new definitions of Share Bonus, Share Bonus Deferral and Share Deferral
are hereby added to Section 1.1 of the Plan as follows:
 Share Bonus
 Share Bonus Deferral
 Share Deferral
 2.
    
    The following new subsection (d) is hereby added to Section 3.1 of the Plan as follows:




---



##### 



3.
    
    The following clauses (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) are hereby added at the end of Section 4.1(a)
of the Plan as follows:
 Share Deferral provided however
 Share Bonus Deferral provided however




---



##### 



4.
    
    This Amendment shall be effective as of December 21, 2006.5.
    
    Except to the extent hereinabove set forth, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
 st
 CEDAR SHOPPING CENTERS, INC.By:
    /s/ LEO S. ULLMANName:
    Leo S. UllmanTitle:
    President
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

JEREMY MICHAEL BANEY, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 39 MAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 6th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED. 

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
### SUBCHAPTER III—PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITMENTS
### SUBCHAPTER I—NOISE ABATEMENT
#### United Refrigerator Company, Appellant, v. Mark Rose, Respondent.

— Order, entered on May 23, 1963, unanimously modified, upon the law and the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, to provide that the answer of defendant-respondent shall be and is stricken unless the defendant shall appear for examination before trial at Special Term, within 90 days after entry of the order herein, at a date to be fixed in such order. A date and place in the city here for the examination of the said defendant were fixed in the notice which was duly served for his examination; and this defendant, failing to move against the notice, agreed by a series of stipulations to an adjournment of the examination to future dates to be held here. There is no factual showing of undue hardship to move the court in its discretion to now modify the notice to change the place of examination, and, thus, he should be directed to appear here for the examination notwithstanding that he has now acquired a foreign State residence. (See *Mossew*v. *To Market,*3 A D 2d 189; *Drews*V. *Spencer,*274 App. Div. 802; see, also, CPLR, §§ 3103, 3126.) Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
From File WorkSheet.wst

Full Precision Full Precision OFF

Confidence Coefficient 0.95

Number of Valid Observations 19638

Number of Distinct Observations 2748

Minimum 0.1

Maximum 4013

Mean of Raw Data 118.9

Standard Deviation of Raw Data 72.29

Kstar 2.002

Mean of Log Transformed Data 4.508

Standard Deviation of Log Transformed Data 0.979

Correlation Coefficient R 0.92

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.0502

Lilliefors Critical (0.95) Value 0.00632

Correlation Coefficient R 0.922

A-D Test Statistic 5.092E+26

A-D Critical (0.95) Value 0.767

K-S Test Statistic 0.0887

K-S Critical(0.95) Value 0.0184

Correlation Coefficient R 0.871

Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.152

Lilliefors Critical (0.95) Value 0.00632