alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Harold Barson, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of ABC Funding, Inc. (the "Company"), certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of ABC Funding, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

I, as the sole certifying officer have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Date: October 26, 2005

By: /s/ Harold Barson

______________________________

Harold Barson



Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer
### §14503. Withholding State and local income tax by certain carriers

(a) Single State Tax Withholding.—

(1) In general.—No part of the compensation paid by a motor carrier providing transportation subject to jurisdiction under subchapter I of chapter 135 or by a motor private carrier to an employee who performs regularly assigned duties in 2 or more States as such an employee with respect to a motor vehicle shall be subject to the income tax laws of any State or subdivision of that State, other than the State or subdivision thereof of the employee's residence.

(2) Employee defined.—In this subsection, the term "employee" has the meaning given such term in section 31132.

(b) Special Rules.—

(1) Calculation of earnings.—In this subsection, an employee is deemed to have earned more than 50 percent of pay in a State or subdivision of that State in which the time worked by the employee in the State or subdivision is more than 50 percent of the total time worked by the employee while employed during the calendar year.

(2) Water carriers.—A water carrier providing transportation subject to jurisdiction under subchapter II of chapter 135 shall file income tax information returns and other reports only with—

(A) the State and subdivision of residence of the employee (as shown on the employment records of the carrier); and

(B) the State and subdivision in which the employee earned more than 50 percent of the pay received by the employee from the carrier during the preceding calendar year.

(3) Applicability to sailors.—This subsection applies to pay of a master, officer, or sailor who is a member of the crew on a vessel engaged in foreign, coastwise, intercoastal, or noncontiguous trade or in the fisheries of the United States.

(c) Filing of Information.—A motor and motor private carrier withholding pay from an employee under subsection (a) of this section shall file income tax information returns and other reports only with the State and subdivision of residence of the employee.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §103, Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 901.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 11504 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
§ 36.12 Changes after certification. If an applicant desires to change any feature of certified equipment, he shall first obtain MSHA's approval of the change, pursuant to the following procedure: ( a ) ( 1 ) Application shall be made, as for an original certificate of approval, requesting that the existing certification be extended to cover the proposed change. The application shall be accompanied by specifications and related material as in the case of an original application.
( 2 ) Where the applicant for approval has used an independent laboratory under part 6 of this chapter to perform, in whole or in part, the necessary testing and evaluation for approval of changes to an approved product under this part, the applicant must provide to MSHA as part of the approval application: ( i ) Written evidence of the laboratory's independence and current recognition by a laboratory accrediting organization;
( ii ) Complete technical explanation of how the product complies with each requirement in the applicable MSHA product approval requirements;
( iii ) Identification of components or features of the product that are critical to the safety of the product; and
( iv ) All documentation, including drawings and specifications, as submitted to the independent laboratory by the applicant and as required by this part.
( b ) The application will be examined by MSHA to determine whether inspection and testing of the modified equipment or component or subassembly will be required. Testing will be necessary if there is a possibility that the modification may affect adversely the performance of the equipment. MSHA will inform the applicant whether such testing is required and the component, subassembly, and related material to be submitted for that purpose.
( c ) If the proposed modification meets the requirements of this part, a formal extension of certification will be issued, accompanied by a list of new and corrected drawings and specifications to be added to those already on file as the basis for the extension of certification.
[Sched. 31, 26 FR 645, Jan. 24, 1961, as amended at 52 FR 17516, May 8, 1987; 68 FR 36423, June 17, 2003]
#### In the Matter of Robert A. Lehmer, Petitioner, v. Edgar W. Couper et al., Constituting the Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Motion for stay granted, without costs. Present — Coon, J. P., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
#### § 886.103 Allocation of Section 8 contract authority.

HUD will allocate to field offices contract authority for Section 8 project commitments for metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas in conformance with Section 213(d) of the HCD Act.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9484 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9484

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to make certain improvements 
 relating to the eligibility of veterans to receive reimbursement for 
   emergency treatment furnished through the Veterans Community Care 
                    program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 6, 2024

 Mrs. Rodgers of Washington (for herself, Mr. Bergman, and Mr. Pappas) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to make certain improvements 
 relating to the eligibility of veterans to receive reimbursement for 
   emergency treatment furnished through the Veterans Community Care 
                    program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Removing Extraneous Loopholes 
Insuring Every Veteran Emergency Act'' or the ``RELIEVE Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR REIMBURSEMENT FOR EMERGENCY 
              TREATMENT FURNISHED TO VETERANS.

    (a) Eligibility Requirements.--Section 1725(b)(2)(B) of title 38, 
United States Code, is amended by inserting ``, unless such emergency 
treatment was furnished during the 60-day period following the date on 
which the veteran enrolled in the health care system specified in 
subparagraph (A), in which case no requirement for prior receipt of 
care shall apply'' before the period.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to emergency treatment furnished on or after the 
date that is one year after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 56.11016 Snow and ice on walkways and travelways.

Regularly used walkways and travelways shall be sanded, salted, or cleared of snow and ice as soon as practicable.
**Exhibit 32.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q Quarterly Report ofEldorado Resorts LLC and Eldorado Capital Corp. (collectively, the “Company”)for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: November 13, 2003 | By:    | /s/ Gene R. Carano                      |
|--------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|                     |   | Gene R. Carano, Chief Financial Officer |
|                     |   | of Eldorado Capital Corp.               |

 

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited balance sheets and unaudited statements of earnings found on pages 3
and 4 of the Company's Form 10-QSB for the year to date, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         409,632
<SECURITIES>                                     5,250
<RECEIVABLES>                                  148,778
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               563,660
<PP&E>                                         162,082
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,484,686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          314,558
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           465
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,946,394
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,484,686
<SALES>                                      1,471,053
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,471,053
<CGS>                                          721,559
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  721,559
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               463,275
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             102,247
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                461,140
<INCOME-TAX>                                   166,908
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            294,232
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   294,232
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date:
                May 10, 2007
            By:*/s/
                David A. Dodge*Name:David
                A. DodgeTitle:Chief
                Financial Officer and Principal
                Accounting Officer







A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. and will be
      retained by NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0 710 CITY OF MISSOULA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CHRISTIAN BRIDENSTINE ,

Defendant and Appellant
.

ORDER Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 2 9 , 2020 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 22 2020

04/22/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0710
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsComposite Interlaminar Shear Fracture Toughness, G(sub 2c): Shear Measurement of Sheer Myth?The concept of G2c as a measure of the interlaminar shear fracture toughness of a composite material is critically examined. In particular, it is argued that the apparent G2c as typically measured is inconsistent with the original definition of shear fracture. It is shown that interlaminar shear failure actually consists of tension failures in the resin rich layers between plies followed by the coalescence of ligaments created by these failures and not the sliding of two planes relative to one another that is assumed in fracture mechanics theory. Several strain energy release rate solutions are reviewed for delamination in composite laminates and structural components where failures have been experimentally documented. Failures typically occur at a location where the mode 1 component accounts for at least one half of the total G at failure. Hence, it is the mode I and mixed-mode interlaminar fracture toughness data that will be most useful in predicting delamination failure in composite components in service. Although apparent G2c measurements may prove useful for completeness of generating mixed-mode criteria, the accuracy of these measurements may have very little influence on the prediction of mixed-mode failures in most structural components.Document ID19970011268Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsOBrien, T. Kevin*(Army Research Lab. Adelphi, MD United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1997Subject CategoryComposite MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-110280NAS 1.15:110280ARL-TR-1312Accession Number97N16233Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 581-10-21-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970011268.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §5124. Criminal penalty

(a) In General.—A person knowingly violating section 5104(b) or willfully or recklessly violating this chapter or a regulation, order, special permit, or approval issued under this chapter shall be fined under title 18, imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both; except that the maximum amount of imprisonment shall be 10 years in any case in which the violation involves the release of a hazardous material that results in death or bodily injury to any person.

(b) Knowing Violations.—For purposes of this section—

(1) a person acts knowingly when—

(A) the person has actual knowledge of the facts giving rise to the violation; or

(B) a reasonable person acting in the circumstances and exercising reasonable care would have that knowledge; and

(2) knowledge of the existence of a statutory provision, or a regulation or a requirement required by the Secretary, is not an element of an offense under this section.

(c) Willful Violations.—For purposes of this section, a person acts willfully when—

(1) the person has knowledge of the facts giving rise to the violation; and

(2) the person has knowledge that the conduct was unlawful.

(d) Reckless Violations.—For purposes of this section, a person acts recklessly when the person displays a deliberate indifference or conscious disregard to the consequences of that person's conduct.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(d), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 781; Pub. L. 109–59, title VII, §7121, Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1906.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 5124 | 49 App.:1809(b). | Jan. 3, 1975, Pub. L. 93–633, §110(b), 88 Stat. 2161; restated Nov. 16, 1990, Pub. L. 101–615, §12(b), 104 Stat. 3259. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2005—Pub. L. 109–59 reenacted section catchline without change and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "A person knowingly violating section 5104(b) of this title or willfully violating this chapter or a regulation prescribed or order issued under this chapter shall be fined under title 18, imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both."
<PAGE>


Exhibit 10.14



                                     CONSENT

         The undersigned, as Guarantor under that certain Guarantee dated as of
June 28, 2001 in favor of Silicon Valley Bank (the "Bank") with respect to the
obligations of INT'L.com, Inc., International Language Engineering Corporation,
Harvard Translations, Inc., Lionbridge Technologies California, Inc. and Data
Dimensions, Inc. (collectively, the "Borrowers"), as modified by that certain
Guarantee Modification Agreement (No. 1) dated as of April 29, 2002 (as so
modified the "Guaranty") under that Loan and Security Agreement dated as of June
28, 2001 between the Borrowers and the Bank (as heretofore amended, the "Loan
Agreement"), hereby ratifies and confirms the Guarantee in all respects, which
Guarantee shall continue to be in full force and effect except that, upon the
effectiveness of, and on and after the effective date of, that certain Loan
Document Modification Agreement (No. 3) and Consent ("Amendment No. 3"), among
the Bank, the Borrowers and eTesting Labs, Inc., a Delaware corporation
("eTesting"), each reference in the Guarantee to the "Borrowers" shall include a
reference to eTesting, in addition to the other borrowers therein defined; each
reference in the Guarantee and in each other Loan Document (as defined in Loan
Agreement) to which the undersigned is a party, to "the Loan Agreement",
"thereunder", "thereof", "therein", or words of like import referring to the
Loan Agreement, shall mean and be a reference to the Loan Agreement, as amended
by Amendment No. 3; and each reference in the Guarantee and in each such other
Loan Document to "the Note", "thereof", "therein", "thereunder", or words of
like import referring to the Promissory Note dated as of June 28, 2001 or the
Amended and Restated Promissory Note dated as of September 24, 2001 or April 29,
2002, shall mean and be a reference to such Promissory Note or Amended and
Restated Promissory Note, as amended and restated by the Amended Note as defined
in Amendment No. 3.

Date:  September 20, 2002            LIONBRIDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.



                                     By: /s/ Stephen J. Lifshatz
                                          Stephen Lifshatz
                                          Chief Financial Officer


                                       1
#### § 56.6406 Duration of current flow.

If any part of a blast is connected in parallel and is to be initiated from powerlines or lighting circuits, the time of current flow shall be limited to a maximum of 25 milliseconds. This can be accomplished by incorporating an arcing control device in the blasting circuit or by interrupting the circuit with an explosive device attached to one or both lead lines and initiated by a 25-millisecond delay electric detonator.
#### J. C. Harlow, appellee, v. M. Niederman, appellant.

Gen. No. 28,441.

Suit on note. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Howard Hayes, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at - the March term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed November 27, 1923.

Harold A. Fein, for appellant. H. E. Wynekoop, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.