alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
130 STAT. 1424 PUBLIC LAW 114–280—DEC. 16, 2016 

Public Law 114–280 

114th Congress 

An Act 

Designate the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient clinic 

in Newark, Ohio, as the Daniel L. Kinnard VA Clinic. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

Congress finds the following: 

(1) Daniel L. Kinnard was born on October 21, 1949, in 

Mount Vernon, Ohio. 

(2) While residing in Newark, Ohio, Daniel L. Kinnard 

enlisted in the Army at Fort Hayes, Ohio, on November 14, 

1966, and served as a Specialist Fourth Class in the 101st 

Airborne Division. 

(3) Specialist Kinnard was awarded the National Defense 

Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign 

Medal, Parachutist Badge, Sharpshooter Badge with Rifle Bar, 

Bronze Star for Valor, Purple Heart, Good Conduct Medal, 

and the Combat Medical Badge. 

(4) Specialist Kinnard’s citation for the Bronze Star said, 

‘‘For heroism in combat against a hostile force in the Republic 

of Vietnam on 17 February 1968. Specialist Four Kinnard 

distinguished himself while attached as a medic on a combat 

operation near Quang Tri, Republic of Vietnam. The point 

platoon made contact with enemy positions in a hedgerow and 

two of the point men were seriously wounded. Without hesitation, Specialist Kinnard rushed through the heavy volume 

of enemy fire to reach the wounded men. With complete disregard for his own personal safety, Specialist Kinnard remained 

exposed to enemy fire while he treated the wounded men. 

Once he administered first aid to the wounded, Specialist 

Kinnard organized their evacuation under fire. His personal 

bravery and devotion to duty were in keeping with the highest 

traditions of the military service and reflect great credit upon 

himself, his unit, and United States Army.’’. 

(5) Specialist Kinnard was killed in action on March 9, 

1968, while rendering aid to his fellow paratroopers. 

SEC. 2. DANIEL L. KINNARD VA CLINIC. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient clinic located in Newark, Ohio, shall after 

the date of the enactment of this Act be known and designated 

as the ‘‘Daniel L. Kinnard VA Clinic’’. 

Dec. 16, 2016 

[H.R. 960] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
PUBLIC LAW 114–280—DEC. 16, 2016 130 STAT. 1425 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 960: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

May 23, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 9, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient clinic referred 

to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 

Daniel L. Kinnard VA Clinic. 

Approved December 16, 2016. 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
| **Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows Supplemental Disclosures (Net cash paid or received) (Details) (USD $)In Thousands, unless otherwise specified** | 6 Months Ended |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
||
| **Supplemental Cash Flow Elements [Abstract]**                                                                                                          |           |   |
| Interest paid including capitalized interest                                                                                                            | $ 37,658       | $ 35,139 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
The amount of cash paid for interest during the period net of cash paid for interest that is capitalized.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 230 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367179&loc=d3e4297-108586
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_InterestPaidNet**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**credit**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_SupplementalCashFlowElementsAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
### SUBCHAPTER III—ADJUSTMENTS OF DEBTS
§ 560.500 Electronic document and data transmissions. ( a ) BOEM may notify you that it will allow or request you to submit the following information electronically through BOEM's secure electronic filing system, through an alternate secure electronic filing system supported and maintained by the Department, or through some other electronic filing system that BOEM has approved for this purpose: ( 1 ) Any document(s) or information described in the Qualifications section of part 556 of this chapter, as specified in subpart E. Such information would include, but not be limited to, the official name of the qualifying person, its legal and business address or addresses, its legal form and status, and the names and contact information of a person or organization authorized to act on the person's behalf.
( 2 ) Any document(s) or information required to obtain BOEM's approval of an assignment or sublease, including any form or instrument that creates or transfers ownership of a lease interest.
( 3 ) Any document(s) or information required to obtain BOEM's approval of your relinquishment of all, or any aliquot part of your lease, as specified in § 556.1101 of this chapter.
( 4 ) Any document(s) creating, transferring or assigning economic interests, as specified in §§ 556.715 and 556.808 of this chapter.
( 5 ) Any document(s) related to a bond, U.S. Treasury note or other security provided to BOEM, which is required to guarantee your compliance with terms and conditions of a lease.
( 6 ) Any document(s) or information necessary to bid for an OCS lease.
( 7 ) Any forms, document(s) or information necessary to determine worst case oil-spill discharge volume(s), or to provide evidence demonstrating oil spill financial responsibility, or to guarantee such financial responsibility or to comply with any other requirements of the Oil Spill Financial Responsibility Program, as described in part 553 of this chapter.
( b ) BOEM reserves the right to require the electronic filing of any document(s) or information addressed in paragraph (a)(5) of this section upon a 90-day notice published in the Federal Register; if BOEM mandates that you transmit such document(s) or information electronically, the Federal Register notice will specify the filing details necessary to comply with this regulation.
( c ) In the event BOEM sends documents to you in a secure electronic format, you may either return the document(s) in an electronic format utilizing the same secure transmission mechanism or print the document(s) and return them.
( d ) BOEM may electronically acknowledge, approve, sign, or execute any document(s) referenced in this section.
### §738. Free interchange of merchandise with United States

All merchandise and articles coming into the United States from Puerto Rico and coming into Puerto Rico from the United States shall be entered at the several ports of entry free of duty and in no event shall any tariff duties be collected on said merchandise or articles.

(Apr. 12, 1900, ch. 191, §3, 31 Stat. 77; May 17, 1932, ch. 190, 47 Stat. 158.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Act Apr. 12, 1900, §3, as originally enacted, imposed tariff duties, amounting to 15 per centum of the duties on like articles imported from foreign countries, on all articles of merchandise coming into the United States from Porto Rico and vice versa. Merchandise and articles except coffee, not dutiable under United States' tariff laws, and merchandise or articles entered in Porto Rico free of duty under orders theretofore made by the Secretary of War, were to be admitted from the United States free of duty, all laws or parts of laws to the contrary, notwithstanding. However, all of the aforesaid tariff duties were to cease, and the provisions in the text were to become operative, whenever the local legislative assembly should put into operation a system of local taxation, and the President should make proclamation thereof. In no event were those duties to be collected after March 1, 1902. In accordance with the aforesaid provision President McKinley issued his proclamation July 25, 1901, 32 Stat. 1983.

Section 3 also contained provisions relating to a tax on merchandise of Porto Rican manufacture equal to the internal-revenue tax imposed in the United States, and on merchandise of United States manufacture coming into Porto Rico, a tax equal to the internal-revenue tax imposed in Porto Rico upon like articles of Porto Rican manufacture which are contained in sections 7652 and 7653 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.

Section was not enacted as part of the Puerto Rican Federal Relations Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Puerto Rico" substituted in text for "Porto Rico" pursuant to act May 17, 1932, which is classified to section 731a of this title.
### §1751. Delegate to House of Representatives from Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands

The Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands shall be represented in the United States Congress by the Resident Representative to the United States authorized by section 901 of the Covenant To Establish a Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands in Political Union With the United States of America (approved by Public Law 94–241 (48 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.)). The Resident Representative shall be a nonvoting Delegate to the House of Representatives, elected as provided in this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 110–229, title VII, §711, May 8, 2008, 122 Stat. 868.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 901 of the Covenant to Establish a Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands in Political Union with the United States of America, referred to in text, is contained in section 1 of Pub. L. 94–241, set out as a note under section 1801 of this title.

Public Law 94–241, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 94–241, Mar. 24, 1976, 90 Stat. 263, which is classified generally to subchapter I (§1801 et seq.) of this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this subtitle", meaning subtitle B (§§711–718) of title VII of Pub. L. 110–229, May 8, 2008, 122 Stat. 868, which enacted this subchapter and amended sections 4342, 6954 and 9432 of Title 10, Armed Forces. For complete classification of subtitle B to the Code, see Tables.
§ 285.1016 When will an Alternate Use RUE be cancelled? The Secretary may cancel an Alternate Use RUE if it is determined, after notice and opportunity to be heard: ( a ) You no longer qualify to hold an Alternate Use RUE;
( b ) You failed to provide any additional financial assurance required by BOEM, replace or provide additional coverage for a de-valued bond, or replace a lapsed or forfeited bond within the prescribed time period;
( c ) Continued activity under the Alternate Use RUE is likely to cause serious harm or damage to natural resources; life (including human and wildlife); property; the marine, coastal, or human environment; or sites, structures, or objects of historical or archaeological significance;
( d ) Continued activity under the Alternate Use RUE is determined to be adversely impacting the original OCS Lands Act approved activities on the existing OCS facility;
( e ) You failed to comply with any of the terms and conditions of your approved Alternate Use RUE or your approved plan; or
( f ) You otherwise failed to comply with applicable laws or regulations.
#### SCHMUCKER, Appellant, v. BUFFALO DREDGING CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department,

March 1, 1905.)

Action by John Schmucker against the Buffalo Dredging Company. No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1932 What are my EPP requirements? ( a ) Your management must consult with their employees on the development, implementation, and modification of your SEMS program.
( b ) Your management must develop a written plan of action regarding how your appropriate employees, in both your offices and those working on offshore facilities, will participate in your SEMS program development and implementation.
( c ) Your management must ensure that employees have access to sections of your SEMS program that are relevant to their jobs.
[78 FR 20443, Apr. 5, 2013]
#### § 56.12071 Movement or operation of equipment near high-voltage power lines.

When equipment must be moved or operated near energized high-voltage powerlines (other than trolley lines) and the clearance is less than 10 feet, the lines shall be deenergized or other precautionary measures shall be taken.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Release No. 34-90615; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2020-065]

                    On September 30, 2020, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [1]                                          and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,[2]                                          a proposed rule change to lower the enterprise license fee for broker-dealers distributing Nasdaq Basic to internal professional subscribers as set forth in the Equity 7 Pricing Schedule, Section 147, and the enterprise license fee for broker-dealers distributing Nasdaq Last Sale to professional subscribers at Equity 7, Section 139. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 20, 2020.[3] 

On November 23, 2020, the Exchange withdrew the proposed rule change (SR-NASDAQ-2020-065).

      ( print page 81258)    
                        For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.[4] 

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,

Assistant Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             17 CFR 240.19b-4.                    
        Back to Citation      

3.                                                     *See*                         Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90177 (October 14, 2020), 85 FR 66620. Comments on the proposed rule change can be found at:                         *https://www.sec.gov/​comments/​sr-nasdaq-2020-065/​srnasdaq2020065.htm.*
        Back to Citation      

4.                                 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).                        
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2020-27485 Filed 12-14-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### § 56.12027 Grounding mobile equipment.

Frame grounding or equivalent protection shall be provided for mobile equipment powered through trailing cables.
### §41767. Termination

(a) Authority To Issue Federal Credit Instruments.—The authority of the Secretary of Transportation to issue Federal credit instruments under section 41763 shall terminate on the date that is 5 years after the date of the enactment of this subchapter.

(b) Continuation of Authority To Administer Program for Existing Federal Credit Instruments.—On and after the termination date, the Secretary shall continue to administer the program established under this subchapter for Federal credit instruments issued under this subchapter before the termination date until all obligations associated with such instruments have been satisfied.

(Added Pub. L. 106–181, title II, §210(a), Apr. 5, 2000, 114 Stat. 101.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of the enactment of this subchapter, referred to in subsec. (a), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 106–181, which was approved Apr. 5, 2000.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable only to fiscal years beginning after Sept. 30, 1999, see section 3 of Pub. L. 106–181, set out as an Effective Date of 2000 Amendments note under section 106 of this title.
#### § 36.8 Date for conducting tests.

The date for acceptance of an application will determine the order of precedence for testing when more than one application is pending, and the applicant will be notified of the date on which tests will begin. If a complete assembly, or component, or subassembly fails to meet any of the requirements, it shall lose its order of precedence. However, if the cause of failure is corrected, testing will be resumed after completing such test work as may be in progress.
#### Celina Banks et al., Appellants, v New York City Department of Education, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

[832 NYS2d 812]—

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mega, J.), dated February 9, 2006, which granted the motion of the defendant New York City Department of Education to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) or, in the alternative, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, that branch of the respondent’s motion which was to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) is denied, and that branch of the respondent’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it is denied as premature.

CPLR 3212 (f) permits a party opposing a summary judgment motion to obtain discovery when it appears that facts supporting the position of the nonmoving party exist but cannot be stated because they are exclusively within the knowledge and control of the moving party *(see Juseinoski v New York Hosp. Med. Ctr. of Queens,*29 AD3d 636 [2006]; *Urcan v Cocarelli,*234 AD2d 537 [1996]). This is particularly relevant when the opposing party has not had a reasonable opportunity to develop the record through discovery *(see Baron v Incorporated Vil. of Freeport,*143 AD2d 792 [1988]). In their opposing papers, the plaintiffs established that they had not yet had an opportunity to conduct discovery into the issue of whether the New York City Department of Education (hereinafter the DOE), with the New York City Transit Authority, undertook to provide transportation to the students of William A. Morris Intermediate School 61. Since the information that would clarify this issue is solely within the possession of the DOE and the New York City Transit Authority, the plaintiffs were entitled to discovery on this essential issue of fact *(see*CPLR 3212 [f]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied, as premature, that branch of the DOE’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

*788Furthermore, there is no merit to the branch of the DOE’s motion which was to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action *(see generally Ernest v Red Cr. Cent. School Dist.,*93 NY2d 664 [1999]; *Mirand v City of New York,*84 NY2d 44 [1994]). Crane, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Dillon, JJ., concur.
_________________________________________ 

 

________________________________________ 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132913-14 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. JEFFREY M. RUPERSBURG, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices v SC: 132913 

COA: 262388 

ETKIN SKANSKA CONSTRUCTION Oakland CC: 2000-023553-NO 

COMPANY OF MICHIGAN, f/k/a A.J. ETKIN

CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, BAKER 

CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC., and

WHALEY STEEL CORPORATION, 

 Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

L.W. CONNELLY & SON, INC.,

 Defendant.
 

JODI L. RUPERSBURG and JEFFREY M. 

RUPERSBURG,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 132914 

COA: 262406 

ETKIN SKANSKA CONSTRUCTION Oakland CC: 2002-045346-NO 

COMPANY OF MICHIGAN, f/k/a A.J. ETKIN

CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, BAKER 

CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC., and

WHALEY STEEL CORPORATION, 

 Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

L.W. CONNELLY & SON, INC.,

 Defendant.
 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 30, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0319 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 26, 2007 

 Clerk
#### § 56.12036 Fuse removal or replacement.

Fuses shall not be removed or replaced by hand in an energized circuit, and they shall not otherwise be removed or replaced in an energized circuit unless equipment and techniques especially designed to prevent electrical shock are provided and used for such purpose.
#### FERDINAND MUNCH BREWERY, Appellant, v. HUNTER, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 27, 1905.)

Action by the Ferdinand Munch Brewery against William J. Hunter. No opinion. Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs.