alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NUMBER 13

- 18

- 00 086

- CV



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI C EDINBURG

CARLOS GOMEZ AMAYA

, Appellant,

v.

BISSELL HOMECARE INC

. , Appellee.

On appeal from the 370th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.



### ORDER TO FILE APPELL ANT ' S BRIEF

Before Justices Rodriguez , Contreras, and Benavides

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on appell ant’ s fourth motion for extension of time to

file the brief. Appellant ’ s brief was originally due to be filed on May 4, 2018 , and this

Court has previously granted appellant three extension s for the filing of appellant ’ s brief

in this cause. Appellant has now filed his fourth motion requesting additional time to file

the app ellate brief in this cause.2

The Court, having fully examined and considered appellant's fourth motion for

extension of time to file the brief and the extension s previously granted in this cause, is

of the opinion that, in the interest of justice, appellant's fourth motion for extension of time

to file the brief should be granted with order. The Court, however, looks with disfavor

upon the dela y caused by counsel's failure to have filed a brief in this matter.

Appellant's fourth motion for extension of time to file the brief is hereby granted,

and the Honorable Charles H. Sierra, counsel for appellant, is hereby ORDERED to file

the appellate brief with this Court on or before October 15, 2018 . No further extensions

will be granted in this matter absent exigent circumstances

.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

21 st day of September, 2018

.
§ 57.19024 Retirement criteria. Unless damage or deterioration is removed by cutoff, wire ropes shall be removed from service when any of the following conditions occurs: ( a ) The number of broken wires within a rope lay length, excluding filler wires, exceeds either— ( 1 ) Five percent of the total number of wires; or
( 2 ) Fifteen percent of the total number of wires within any strand.
( b ) On a regular lay rope, more than one broken wire in the valley between strands in one rope lay length.
( c ) A loss of more than one-third of the original diameter of the outer wires.
( d ) Rope deterioration from corrosion.
( e ) Distortion of the rope structure.
( f ) Heat damage from any source.
( g ) Diameter reduction due to wear that exceeds six percent of the baseline diameter measurement.
( h ) Loss of more than ten percent of rope strength as determined by nondestructive testing.
### §927. Existing allocation and transfer authority retained

#### (a) Additional reallocation

Nothing in this subchapter prevents or limits additional reallocation of spectrum from the Federal Government to other users.

#### (b) Implementation of new technologies and services

Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter—

(1) the Secretary may, consistent with section 903(e) of this title, at any time allow frequencies allocated on a primary basis for Federal Government use to be used by non-Federal licensees on a mixed-use basis for the purpose of facilitating the prompt implementation of new technologies or services and for other purposes; and

(2) the Commission shall make any allocation and licensing decisions with respect to such frequencies in a timely manner and in no event later than the date required by section 157 of this title.

(Pub. L. 102–538, title I, §117, as added Pub. L. 103–66, title VI, §6001(a)(3), Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 386.)
§ 3.510 Recruitment. ( a ) *Nondiscriminatory recruitment and hiring.* A recipient shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in the recruitment and hiring of employees. Where a recipient has been found to be presently discriminating on the basis of sex in the recruitment or hiring of employees, or has been found to have so discriminated in the past, the recipient shall recruit members of the sex so discriminated against so as to overcome the effects of such past or present discrimination.
( b ) *Recruitment patterns.* A recipient shall not recruit primarily or exclusively at entities that furnish as applicants only or predominantly members of one sex if such actions have the effect of discriminating on the basis of sex in violation of §§ 3.500 through 3.550.
#### Mary Simet, Respondent-Appellant, v The Coleman Company, Inc., et al., Appellants-Respondents, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Mary Simet, Respondent-Appellant, v Clayton Henry Theisen et al., Appellants-Respondents, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 2.)

[833 NYS2d 422]

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Christopher J. Burns, J.), entered March 21, 2006 in a personal injury action. The order granted in part the motion of defendants The Coleman Company, Inc., Fleetwood Folding Trailers, Inc., Lakeland Garage Ltd., Clayton Henry Theisen, and Clayton Henry Theisen, doing business as Lakeland Garage, for summary judgment.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present—Scudder, P.J., Smith, Fahey and Pine, JJ.
§ 550.221 What environmental monitoring information must accompany the EP? The following environmental monitoring information, as applicable, must accompany your EP: ( a ) *Monitoring systems.* A description of any existing and planned monitoring systems that are measuring, or will measure, environmental conditions or will provide project-specific data or information on the impacts of your exploration activities.
( b ) *Incidental takes.* If there is reason to believe that protected species may be incidentally taken by planned exploration activities, you must describe how you will monitor for incidental take of: ( 1 ) Threatened and endangered species listed under the ESA; and
( 2 ) Marine mammals, as appropriate, if you have not already received authorization for incidental take as may be necessary under the MMPA.
( c ) *Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary (FGBNMS).* If you propose to conduct exploration activities within the protective zones of the FGBNMS, a description of your provisions for monitoring the impacts of an oil spill on the environmentally sensitive resources at the FGBNMS.
#### WILLIAMS et al., Respondents, v. HATCH, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Pivision, Fourth Department.

March 15, 1905.)

Action by Elizabeth B. Williams and others against Albert G. Hatch.

PER CURIAM.

Cause restored to the calendar. Appeal dismissed, with costs, including $10 costs of motion, unless within 10 days appellant file and serve the printed papers on appeal and pay the $10 costs "of this motion, in which event the motion is denied.
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.1200 Question index table.

The table in this section lists questions concerning Oil and Gas Production Measurement, Surface Commingling, and Security.

| Frequently asked questions | CFR citation |
| --- | --- |
| 1. What are the requirements for measuring liquid hydrocarbons? | § 250.1202(a) |
| 2. What are the requirements for liquid hydrocarbon royalty meters? | § 250.1202(b) |
| 3. What are the requirements for run tickets? | § 250.1202(c) |
| 4. What are the requirements for liquid hydrocarbon royalty meter provings? | § 250.1202(d) |
| 5. What are the requirements for calibrating a master meter used in royalty meter provings? | § 250.1202(e) |
| 6. What are the requirements for calibrating mechanical-displacement provers and tank provers? | § 250.1202(f) |
| 7. What correction factors must a lessee use when proving meters with a mechanical displacement prover, tank prover, or master meter? | § 250.1202(g) |
| 8. What are the requirements for establishing and applying operating meter factors for liquid hydrocarbons? | § 250.1202(h) |
| 9. Under what circumstances does a liquid hydrocarbon royalty meter need to be taken out of service, and what must a lessee do? | § 250.1202(i) |
| 10. How must a lessee correct gross liquid hydrocarbon volumes to standard conditions? | § 250.1202(j) |
| 11. What are the requirements for liquid hydrocarbon allocation meters? | § 250.1202(k) |
| 12. What are the requirements for royalty and inventory tank facilities? | § 250.1202(l) |
| 13. To which meters do BSEE requirements for gas measurement apply? | § 250.1203(a) |
| 14. What are the requirements for measuring gas? | § 250.1203(b) |
| 15. What are the requirements for gas meter calibrations? | § 250.1203(c) |
| 16. What must a lessee do if a gas meter is out of calibration or malfunctioning? | § 250.1203(d) |
| 17. What are the requirements when natural gas from a Federal lease is transferred to a gas plant before royalty determination? | § 250.1203(e) |
| 18. What are the requirements for measuring gas lost or used on a lease? | § 250.1203(f) |
| 19. What are the requirements for the surface commingling of production? | § 250.1204(a) |
| 20. What are the requirements for a periodic well test used for allocation? | § 250.1204(b) |
| 21. What are the requirements for site security? | § 250.1205(a) |
| 22. What are the requirements for using seals? | § 250.1205(b) |
#### § 1207.2 Definitions.

The definitions in part 1206 of this title are applicable to this part.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ultra Petroleum Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, F. Fox Benton III,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date: August 7, 2003                      By: /s/ F. Fox Benton III
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              F. Fox Benton
                                              Chief Financial Officer

         This certification is being furnished solely for purposes of compliance
with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
subject to the liabilities of that Section. Registration Statements or other
documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission shall not
incorporate this exhibit by reference, except as otherwise expressly stated in
such filing.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Ultra Petroleum Corp. and will be retained by Ultra Petroleum
Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     I, Richard P. Brown, Chief Executive Officer of American Casino & Entertainment Properties LLC(the “Registrant”), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the annualreport on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 of the Registrant (the “Report”): (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.     By: /s/ Richard P. Brown Richard P. Brown
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3239 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3239

      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on halofenozide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 2005

  Mr. Buyer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on halofenozide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HALOFENOZIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.90 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to halofenozide) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[114th Congress Public Law 310]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 130 STAT. 1530]]

Public Law 114-310
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 2024 Jerome Avenue, in Bronx, New York, as the ``Dr. Roscoe C. Brown, 
   Jr. Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Dec. 16, 2016 -  [H.R. 6282]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DR. ROSCOE C. BROWN, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2024 Jerome Avenue, in Bronx, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Dr. Roscoe C. Brown, Jr. Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dr. Roscoe 
C. Brown, Jr. Post Office Building''.

    Approved December 16, 2016.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 6282:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016):
            Nov. 30, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 9, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
February 26 , 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DR. THEODORE M. HERR ING, JR. AND CARMEN DAWSON , Appellant s
NO. 14

- 13

- 00056

- CV V.

HERON LAKES ESTATES OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. , Appellee

________________________________ Today the Court heard appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on December 31, 2012. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We fur ther order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal. We further order that mandate be issued immediately. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
§ 285.637 When may I commence commercial operations on my commercial lease? ( a ) If you are conducting activities on your lease that do not require a FERC license (*i.e.,* wind power projects), then you may commence commercial operations after: ( 1 ) You submit information consistent with § 285.702(c) and (d) for facilities installed prior to commencing commercial operations;
( 2 ) Your CVA submits the project verification report, as described in § 285.708(a)(5), including information required by § 285.708(b)(1), or interim report(s), as described in § 285.712(a) for facilities installed prior to commencing commercial operations;
( 3 ) Your CVA submits the Critical Safety Systems and Equipment commissioning records, as described in § 285.708(a)(6) or interim report(s), as described in § 285.712(a), for facilities installed prior to commencing commercial operations; and
( 4 ) BSEE has not notified you of any objections to the submittals in paragraphs (a)(1) and (3) of this section within the timeframes in §§ 285.700(d) and 285.712(a), as applicable. You may continue commercial operations while BSEE reviews your submittals.
( b ) To continue commercial operations as additional facilities complete commissioning, you must submit information in paragraphs (a)(1) and (3) of this section for facilities installed after commercial operations have commenced.
( c ) You must notify BSEE within 10 business days after you commence commercial operations.
[89 FR 42715, May 15, 2024]
#### § 56.19063 Persons allowed in hoist room.

Only authorized persons shall be in hoist rooms.
#### § 36.28 Signal or warning device.

All mobile diesel-powered transportation equipment shall be provided with a bell, horn, or other suitable warning device convenient to the operator. Warning devices shall be operated manually or pneumatically.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of Cardima,  Inc. (the  "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the quarter  ending  September 30, 2006 as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  each  of the
undersigned,  in  the  capacities  and  on  the  date  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 14, 2006

/s/ Gabriel B. Vegh
-------------------
Gabriel B. Vegh
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and Acting Chief Financial Officer
Cite as 23 I&N Dec. 693 (A.G. 2004) Interim Decision #3503 

In re C-Y-Z-, Applicant 

Decided by Attorney General December 1, 2004 

Decided by Board June 4, 19971 

U.S. Department of Justice

Executive Office for Immigration Review 

Board of Immigration Appeals 

FOR APPLICANT: Yee Ling Poon, Esquire, New York, New York 

FOR DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY: Joe D. Whitley, General Counsel 

BEFORE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 

(December 1, 2004) 

The request of the Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization 

Service to certify for review the captioned decision of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 3.1(h)(1)(iii) (2002)2

 is denied. 

1 The Board’s June 4, 1997, decision in this case was published as Matter of C-Y-Z-, 21 

I&N Dec. 915 (BIA 1997). 

2 On March 1, 2003, the functions of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) 

were transferred from the Department of Justice to the Department of Homeland Security. 

See Homeland Security Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-296, 116 Stat. 2135 (2002). The 

Executive Office for Immigration Review, however, remains in the Department of Justice. 

On February 28, 2003, the Attorney General published a technical rule that moved 8 C.F.R. 

§ 3.1(h) to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(h). See Aliens and Nationality; Homeland Security; 

Reorganization of Regulations, 68 Fed. Reg. 9824, 9830 (Feb. 28, 2003). In addition, the 

authority of the INS Commissioner to refer decisions of the Board of Immigration Appeals 

to the Attorney General is now vested in the Secretary of Homeland Security or in “specific 

officials of the Department of Homeland Security designated by the Secretary with the 

concurrence of the Attorney General.” Id. at 9832 (to be codified at 8 C.F.R. 

§ 1003.1(h)(1)). 

693
#### § 56.19093 Standard signal code.

A standard code of hoisting signals shall be adopted and used at each mine. The movement of a shaft conveyance on a “one bell” signal is prohibited.
September 26, 2013

Mr. Lesly Sanchez Landron

URB Marina Bahia

RC 10 Ave. Putna Las Marias

Catano, PR 00962-6718

Dear Mr. Landron:

This is in response to your letter dated May 23, 2013 (public docket No. FAA-2013-0473) in 

which you petition the Federal Aviation Administration for an exemption from 

§ 65.91(c)(5) of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). The relief you seek would 

permit you to qualify to take the Inspection Authorization written test, without having met the 

requirement to hold a currently effective mechanic certificate with both an airframe rating and 

a powerplant rating, each of which is currently effective and has been in effect for a total of at 

least 3 years. This requirement is found in § 65.91(c)(1).

On October 18, 2012, the FAA received a petition for exemption from Mr. Luis A. Irizarry, 

Aviation Consultant, petitioning on your behalf for the same relief. On November 26, 2012, 

the FAA responded to that request in Denial of Exemption No. 10663 (copy enclosed). In 

your recent letter, you incorrectly cite § 65.91(c)(5) which pertains to the requirement to pass 

the written test once you have fulfilled other eligibility requirements of § 65.91(c); namely 

paragraph (c)(1) of that section. 

In reviewing your recent request, the FAA finds that our position has not changed. Further, 

while § 11.101 allows you to petition for reconsideration of a denial of petition, the request to 

reconsider must be made within 60 days after issuance of the denial and must show the 

following:

(1) That you have a significant additional fact, and why you did not present it in your 

original petition;

(2) That the FAA made an important factual error in its denial of your original 

petition; or

(3) That the FAA did not correctly interpret a law, regulation, or precedent.
2

Since we did not receive your petition for reconsideration within the required 60 days, and 

your recent request failed to meet any of the requirements of § 11.101, we will take no further 

action on your petition. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda D. Courtney

Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Enclosure