alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 246.10 HUD procedures. ( a ) The local HUD office will review the information submitted by the mortgagor together with the decision of the board, if any. The local HUD office will, if it finds that the delay or decision of the board fails to provide adequate residential income to protect the Department's economic interest in the projects and the board will not modify its position to the satisfaction of the local HUD office, make a report with appropriate recommendations concerning the actions that should be taken by HUD to the Office of Multifamily Housing Management and Occupancy, Headquarters. The report shall be sent to the Office of Multifamily Housing Management and Occupancy, Headquarters, and shall include appropriate recommendations concerning the action that should be taken by HUD.
( b ) The Office of Multifamily Housing Management and Occupancy will review the report and will consider whether to preempt the board's regulation. If it finds that the income level permitted by the board is inadequate to maintain the project as described in § 246.5, it shall issue a formal certification to the board that its authority has been preempted as to such rents. Copies of the certification shall be transmitted to the mortgagor, the local HUD office, and the board.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON DC 

AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION OF ) 

AMERICA, INC. d/b/a AIRLINES FOR ) 

AMERICA, ALASKA AIRLINES, INC., ) 

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., ATLAS AIR, ) 

INC., FED EX EXPRESS AIRLINES, ) 

HAWAIIAN AIRLINES, INC., JETBLUE ) 

AIRWAYS INC., SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO., ) 

UNITED AIRLINES, INC., UNITED PARCEL ) 

SERVICE CO., and AIR CANADA, ) 

Complainants, 

v. 

PORT OF PORTLAND, OREGON 

Respondent. 

) 

? 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

FAA Docket No. 16-16-04 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for FederallyAssisted Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR Part 16, 

subpart B, the date by which the Director's Determination will be issued in this matter is 

hereby extended to December 16, 2016. 

An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in 

this case . 

. ~~I) -\=o;L 

Kevm C. W11l1s, D1rector 

Office of Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis 

I 

10 }lc1 J 2-9? \L. r Date 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on October 20, 2016, I caused to be placed in the United States 

Mail a true copy of the FAA's Notice of Extension of Time for FAA Docket No. 16-16-04 

addressed to: 

For Complainants 

David Berg, Esq., Vice President & General 

Counsel 

Doug Mullen, Esq., Assistant General Counsel 

Air Transport Association of America, Inc. 

d/b/a Airlines for America 

1275 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ste 1300 

Washington, D.C. 20004 

(202) 626-4234 

Email: dberg@airlines.org 

dmullen@airlines.org 

For Respondent 

Daniel Blaufus, Esq., General Counsel 

Ian Whitlock, Esq., Deputy General Counsel 

Wendy Hain, Esq., Assistant General Counsel 

The Port of Portland 

7200 NE Airport Way 

Portland, OR 97218 

Email: dan.blaufus@portofportland.com 

ian. whitlock@portofportland.com 

wendy.hain@portofportland.com 

Phone: 503-415-6062 

Fax: 503-944-7080 

Copy to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

Roy Goldberg, Esq. 

Steptoe & Johnson LLP 

1330 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

(202) 429-8028 

Email: rgoldberg@steptoe.com 

Pablo 0. Niiesch, Esq. 

Spiegel &McDiarmid LLP 

1875 Eye Street, NW, Suite 700 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

Email: 

pablo.nuesch@spiegelmcd.com 

Phone: 202-879-4000 

Fax: 202-393-2866 

FAAAkport Compli""" ruill Mmg~'"' Amly~:~ ' 

audia Roberts ~ 

2 

Office of Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis
#### In the Matter of Adam C., Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated July 23, 1976, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent and placed him on probation. Order reversed, on the facts, without costs or disbursements, and petition dismissed. The determination of the fact-finding court was against the weight of the evidence. Suozzi, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsReplacement of PBNA in HB and HC polymers used in SRM propellant and linerThe antioxidant phenyl-beta-naphthylamine (PBNA) was used in both HB and HC polymers. The sole (domestic) supplier of PBNA has withdrawn this product from the market, primarily because of suspected health hazards. Commercially available substitute(s) were selected and qualified for use in the two polymers.Document ID19840004243Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsLevinthal, M. L.*(Thiokol Corp. Brigham City, UT, United States)*Law, R. D.*(Thiokol Corp. Brigham City, UT, United States)*Suisse, D. C.*(Thiokol Corp. Brigham City, UT, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1981Subject CategoryNonmetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:170936NASA-CR-170936TWR-13009Accession Number84N12311Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-30490Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840004243.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 18.63 [Reserved]
### §44743. Pilot training requirements

(a) In General.—

(1) Administrator's determination.—In establishing any pilot training requirements with respect to a new transport airplane, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall independently review any proposal by the manufacturer of such airplane with respect to the scope, format, or minimum level of training required for operation of such airplane.

(2) Assurances and marketing representations.—Before the Administrator has established applicable training requirements, an applicant for a new or amended type certificate for an airplane described in paragraph (1) may not, with respect to the scope, format, or magnitude of pilot training for such airplane—

(A) make any assurance or other contractual commitment, whether verbal or in writing, to a potential purchaser of such airplane unless a clear and conspicuous disclaimer (as defined by the Administrator) is included regarding the status of training required for operation of such airplane; or

(B) provide financial incentives (including rebates) to a potential purchaser of such airplane regarding the scope, format, or magnitude of pilot training for such airplane.

(b) Pilot Response Time.—Beginning on the day after the date on which regulations are issued under section 119(c)(6) of the Aircraft Certification, Safety, and Accountability Act, the Administrator may not issue a new or amended type certificate for an airplane described in subsection (a) unless the applicant for such certificate has demonstrated to the Administrator that the applicant has accounted for realistic assumptions regarding the time for pilot responses to non-normal conditions in designing the systems and instrumentation of such airplane. Such assumptions shall—

(1) be based on test data, analysis, or other technical validation methods; and

(2) account for generally accepted scientific consensus among experts in human factors regarding realistic pilot response time.

(c) Definition.—In this section, the term "transport airplane" means a transport category airplane designed for operation by an air carrier or foreign air carrier type-certificated with a passenger seating capacity of 30 or more or an all-cargo or combi derivative of such an airplane.

(Added Pub. L. 116–260, div. V, title I, §119(a), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2338.)

#### References in Text

Section 119(c) of the Aircraft Certification, Safety, and Accountability Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is section 119(c) of title I of Pub. L. 116–260, div. V, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2339, which is set out as a note under section 44704 of this title.
COVID-19 Guidance on Social Distancing at Work

OSHA is committed to protecting the health and safety of America’s workers and workplaces during 

these unprecedented times. The agency will be issuing a series of alerts designed to keep workers safe.

Social (physical) distancing involves maintaining at least six feet of distance between people and is an 

effective way to help reduce the risk of exposure to the coronavirus. The following steps can help 

employers implement social distancing in the workplace:

 Encourage workers to stay home if they are sick. 

 Isolate any worker who begins to exhibit symptoms until they can either go home or leave to 

seek medical care.

 Establish flexible worksites (e.g., telecommuting) and flexible work hours (e.g., staggered shifts), 

if feasible.

 In workplaces where customers are present, mark six-foot distances with floor tape in areas where

lines form, use drive-through windows or curbside pickup, and limit the number of customers 

allowed at one time. 

 Stagger breaks and rearrange seating in common break areas to maintain physical distance 

between workers.

 Move or reposition workstations to create more distance, and install plexiglass partitions.

 Encourage workers to bring any safety and health concerns to the employers’ attention.

For more information, visit www.osha.gov/coronavirus or call 1-800-321-OSHA (6742).

OSHA issues alerts to draw attention to 

worker safety and health issues and solutions.

 • osha.gov/coronavirus • 1-800-321-OSHA (6742) • @OSHA_DOL

OSHA 4027-05 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1997
<CASH>                                             300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,250,062
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,884,328
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,623,957
<PP&E>                                       1,510,065
<DEPRECIATION>                                 653,484
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,507,714
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,306,131
<BONDS>                                        372,401
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,293,841
<OTHER-SE>                                     468,046
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,507,714
<SALES>                                     13,005,184
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,005,184
<CGS>                                        7,568,247
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,568,511
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,221
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             157,230
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                680,975
<INCOME-TAX>                                   246,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            434,975
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   434,975
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-13(C)(2), THE COMPANY HAS OMITTED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FROM
ITS FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS  ENDING MARCH 31, 1996.  SINCE THE  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS  HAVE BEEN  OMITTED,  THIS  FINANCIAL  DATA SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  ZEROS
INSTEAD OF THE APPROPRIATE  NUMBERS, AND SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS THE ACTUAL
FINANCIAL POSITION OF THE COMPANY.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 18, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 76699]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-30168]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8551]

Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
the Republic of the Congo

    Pursuant to Section 7031(b)(3) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012 (Div. I, Pub. 
L. 112-74) (``the Act''), as carried forward by the Further Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2013 (Div. F, Pub. L. 113-6) and Department of 
State Delegation of Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it 
is important to the national interest of the United States to waive the 
requirements of Section 7031(b)(1) of the Act and similar provisions of 
law in prior year Acts with respect to the Republic of the Congo and I 
hereby waive this restriction.
    This determination and the accompanying Memorandum of Justification 
shall be reported to the Congress, and the determination shall be 
published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: September 5, 2013.
William J. Burns,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-30168 Filed 12-17-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-26-P
```
#### In the Matter of 2639 Corporation, Respondent-Appellant, v. Tax Commission of the City of New York, Appellant-Respondent.

Order entered on or about December 2, 1957, reducing assessments for the tax years 1955-56 and 1956-57, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, and assessments for said years in the amounts of $9,000,000 and $8,500,000, respectively, reinstated, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondent-appellant-respondent. The total assessment values are justified by the record. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, McNally and Eager, JJ.
### [§727. Repealed. Pub. L. 114–110, §3(a)(4), Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 2228]

Section, Pub. L. 104–88, title II, §201(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 940, related to definitions for this chapter.
* Circuit Judge of the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

** Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-60395

CITY OF SOUTHAVEN, MISSISSIPPI; HAROLD MOORE, Individually And Officially As Members of the Board of Aldermen, City of Southaven, Mississippi; LORINE CADY, Individually And Officially As Members of the Board of Alderman, City of Southaven, Mississippi; HERBERT DICKSON, Individually And Officially As Members of the Board of Aldermen, City of Southaven, Mississippi; LENA THATCH, Individually And Officially As Members of the Board of Aldermen, City of Southaven, Mississippi; OATY HART, Individually And Officially As Members of the Board of Aldermen, City of Southaven, Mississippi; SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

NUTMEG INSURANCE COMPANY AND/OR ITT HARTFORD;
TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

(2:95-CV-132B)

March 7, 1995

Before LAY * , HIGGINBOTHAM and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: **2

We are persuaded that the district court did not err in

concluding that the law enfor cement exclusions in the Nutmeg and

Twin City policies barred coverage for the claims of the Lusk

family. Equally so, we are unpersuaded that the district court

erred in concluding that Nutmeg and Twin City owed no duty to

defend. Finally, we are persuaded that the district court did not

err in concluding that Twin City did not waive reliance on the law

enforcement exclusion by its handling of the reservation of rights

notice.

The City of Southaven, Mississippi purchased three insurance

policies with complimentary coverages. We agree with the district

court’s reading of these interlaced coverages.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9391 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9391

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 108 North Main Street in Bucoda, Washington, as the ``Mayor Rob 
                         Gordan Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 20, 2024

  Ms. Perez (for herself, Ms. DelBene, Mr. Larsen of Washington, Mr. 
  Newhouse, Mrs. Rodgers of Washington, Mr. Kilmer, Ms. Jayapal, Ms. 
 Schrier, Mr. Smith of Washington, and Ms. Strickland) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                             Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 108 North Main Street in Bucoda, Washington, as the ``Mayor Rob 
                         Gordan Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAYOR ROB GORDAN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 108 North Main Street in Bucoda, Washington, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Mayor Rob Gordan Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Mayor Rob 
Gordan Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 57.14100 Safety defects; examination, correction and records. ( a ) Self-propelled mobile equipment to be used during a shift shall be inspected by the equipment operator before being placed in operation on that shift.
( b ) Defects on any equipment, machinery, and tools that affect safety shall be corrected in a timely manner to prevent the creation of a hazard to persons.
( c ) When defects make continued operation hazardous to persons, the defective items including self-propelled mobile equipment shall be taken out of service and placed in a designated area posted for that purpose, or a tag or other effective method of marking the defective items shall be used to prohibit further use until the defects are corrected.
( d ) Defects on self-propelled mobile equipment affecting safety, which are not corrected immediately, shall be reported to, and recorded by, the mine operator. The records shall be kept at the mine or nearest mine office from the date the defects are recorded, until the defects are corrected. Such records shall be made available for inspection by an authorized representative of the Secretary.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael G. Borecky, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, rendered December 4, 1959, convicting him of a violation of subdivision 5-a of section 70 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (leaving the scene of an accident without reporting), and sentencing him to pay a fine of $50 or to serve 30 days in the City Prison. The fine was paid. Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
#### § 56.4011 Abandoned electric circuits.

Abandoned electric circuits shall be deenergized and isolated so that they cannot become energized inadvertently.
EXHIBIT
99.2   From: Robert L. Chapman, Jr.
 Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009
9:04 PM
 To: 'Michael W.
Klinger
 Subject: EDCI Holdings (EDCI):
Board of Directors Meeting 03/09-10/2009: Audit Committee Finance Work
Unacceptable
  March 9,
2009
  MWK,
  The goal
for full implementation of my PowerPoint guidelines, as articulated repeatedly
for the past 3-4 weeks, was not obtained in the Audit Committee presentation.
Outside of the multiple errors (typographical and otherwise), omissions
(operating income and operating margin % not in the 4Q2008 nor FY2008 slides
until I caught the omission), and aesthetics (sloppy presentation was
ubiquitous), your and MDN’s lack of anything near mastery of the 4Q2008 and
FY2008 absolute and relative (Y/Y and Q/Q) numbers was unacceptable. Seemingly,
only KEB displayed confidence in his understanding of the numbers, their
derivation and meaning.
  I am
hoping the finance team’s section of the Board Book and related presentation is
far improved tomorrow.
  RLCjr