**Request to Use CARES Child Restraint System for Larger/Older Persons**

I am writing to request an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent required for **Lwanzo Dupuis** to be able to use an FAA Approved Chil d Restraint Sy stem even though **he** exceeds the weight limits for the CRS. In addition, if my petition is granted, Irequest that an y air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while **Lwanzo** is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) to the extent necessary to allow Lwanzo to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA

- approved child restraint sy stem during use of that child restraint sy stem aboard an aircraft. I believe the pertinent section from 14 CFR part 121 from which we seek reli ef is Section 121.311 Seats, safet y belts, and shoulder harnesses. My son is 8 y ear’s old, weighs 65 pounds, and is 4’4’’ inches tall. My son’ s phy sical condition is as follows **Double spastic hemiparesis, hypotonia of the trunk, limb spasticity**

. As a result of his phy sical condition, he needs the support and security provided by

an FAA Approved C hild Restraint, but because of his weight is incapable of compliance with the regulation. **I am also submitting the following contact information:**  **Christ iane Dupuis (mother)**  **953, route de l’église, app. 508 Québec (Québec) G1V 3V2**  **christianedupuis@outlook.com** I understand that the regulation is written to create a high level of safet y for each individual passenger b y ensuring that they are securel y restrained in their seats during all phases of flight. The regulation also ensures that an individual does not cause harm to other passengers on the airplane b y being thrown into them during turbulent or emergency conditions. I propose that Lwanzo be allow ed to occup y an FAA Approved Child Restraint (CARES, manufactured b y AmSafe, Inc.), even though he exceeds the manufacturer’s weight limits. This ensures a high level of safety for Lwanzo and a high level of safety for the other passengers and cre w on the airplane. In fact, in Lwanzo ’s case, safety is greatl y enhanced by the extra support and securit y that the FAA Approved Restraint System will provide during the entire flight. Enhancing safety

for Lwanzo is in the public interest. In addition, the public i nterest is also served b y the fact that the use of this FAA Approved Child Restraint Sy stem allows him to use commercial air transportation. Without the support and security of the FAA Approved Chil d Restraint Sy stem, he would be unable to fl y commerciall y . I also believe that, with certain limitations established by the FAA in a grant to this petition, there can be an equivalent level of safet y to that provided by the affected regulation. The CARES restraint has been certified by the manufacturer for use b y children 22

- 44 pounds. However, the components of the CARES restraint are the same as those used in restraints for adults on aircraft and would maintain their integrit y if used b y someone who weighed several hundred pounds.I believe that the limit of 4 4 pounds was established because, with the additional weight of the

child attached to the seatback, the seatback would move forward more quickly in an accident scenario and this might cause a higher HIC load for the person seated in the seat behind the pas senger using the CARES restraint (because the seatback moving forward more quickly would mean that it would not be there to attenuate the energy from the impact of the person seated behind the person using the CARES restraint). In order to achieve an equiv alent level of safet y as that provided by the affected regulation, I propose that the FAA establish a limitation in a grant to this petition that Lwanzo only sits in a passenger seat with no p assenger seated behind him . Therefore, no unsafe condition would exist for a passenger seated behind him while he is using the CARES restraint. Ialso propose that all operations under this exemption be conducted with at least one of Lwanzo’s parents or a caregiver accompan yi ng him or he r. In addition, I propose that Lwanzo parent or caregiver must carry a cop y of this exemption.
I also request that the processing of this petition not be delay ed for publication and comment in the Federal Register . We want to travel from **July 18 until July 26 2015**
**.** If y ou take the time to put this in the Federal Register, it will delay the process and we may

not be able to travel in this timeframe. If it is necessary

to put a summary

in the Federal Register, I submit the following: This is a request for an exemption from FAR 121.311 (b) to the extent required for a child to use an FAA Approved Child Restraint Sy stem on an aircraft, even though the child exceeds the weight limits for the CRS. Due to phy sical challenges, without the support and securit y of this FAA App roved Child Restraint Sy stem, this child would be unable to fl y. We request that this child be allowed to occupy an FAA Approved Child Restraint (CARES, manufactured by AmSafe, Inc.), even though he exceeds the manufacturer’s weight limits of 44 pounds. In this case, the safet y of this child is greatl y enhanced by the extra support and securit y that the FAA Approved Res traint S ys tem will provide for him during the flight. Thank y ou for y our consideration of this request.