alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.459 What are the safety requirements for drilling fluid-handling areas? You must classify drilling fluid-handling areas according to API RP 500, Recommended Practice for Classification of Locations for Electrical Installations at Petroleum Facilities, Classified as Class I, Division 1 and Division 2 (as incorporated by reference in § 250.198); or API RP 505, Recommended Practice for Classification of Locations for Electrical Installations at Petroleum Facilities, Classified as Class 1, Zone 0, Zone 1, and Zone 2 (as incorporated by reference in § 250.198). In areas where dangerous concentrations of combustible gas may accumulate, you must install and maintain a ventilation system and gas monitors. Drilling fluid-handling areas must have the following safety equipment: ( a ) A ventilation system capable of replacing the air once every 5 minutes or 1.0 cubic feet of air-volume flow per minute, per square foot of area, whichever is greater. In addition: ( 1 ) If natural means provide adequate ventilation, then a mechanical ventilation system is not necessary;
( 2 ) If a mechanical system does not run continuously, then it must activate when gas detectors indicate the presence of 1 percent or more of combustible gas by volume; and
( 3 ) If discharges from a mechanical ventilation system may be hazardous, then you must maintain the drilling fluid-handling area at a negative pressure. You must protect the negative pressure area by using at least one of the following: a pressure-sensitive alarm, open-door alarms on each access to the area, automatic door-closing devices, air locks, or other devices approved by the District Manager;
( b ) Gas detectors and alarms except in open areas where adequate ventilation is provided by natural means. You must test and recalibrate gas detectors quarterly. No more than 90 days may elapse between tests;
( c ) Explosion-proof or pressurized electrical equipment to prevent the ignition of explosive gases. Where you use air for pressuring equipment, you must locate the air intake outside of and as far as practicable from hazardous areas; and
( d ) Alarms that activate when the mechanical ventilation system fails.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPiloted "Well Clear" Performance Evaluation of Detect-and-Avoid Systems with Suggestive GuidanceThis study evaluated the performance of four prototype unmanned aircraft detect-and-avoid (DAA) display configurations, each with different informational elements driven by alerting and guidance algorithms. Sixteen unmanned aircraft pilots flew each combination of the display configurations, with half being given zero DAA surveillance sensor uncertainty and the other half experiencing errors that were comparable, and in some cases slightly better than, errors that were measured in DAA system flight tests. The displays that showed intruder alert information in altitude and heading bands had significantly fewer losses of well clear compared with alternative displays that lacked that information. This difference was significant from a statistical and practical perspective: those losses that did occur lasted for shorter periods and did not penetrate as far into the geometric "separation cylinder" as those in the non-banded displays. A modest level of DAA surveillance sensor uncertainty did not affect the proportion of losses of well clear or their severity. It is recommended that DAA traffic displays implement a band-type display in order to improve the safety of UAS operations in the National Airspace System. Finally, this report provides pilot response time distributions for responding to DAA alerts.Document ID20170000750Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsMueller, Eric R.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)*Santiago, Confesor*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)*Watza, Spencer*(University of Western Michigan Kalamazoo, MI, United States)*Date AcquiredJanuary 24, 2017Publication DateOctober 1, 2016Subject CategoryAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberARC-E-DAA-TN36266NASA/TM-2016-219396Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Keywordsunmanned aircraft systemdetect and avoidpilot-in-the-loop simulationAvailable DownloadsNameType20170000750.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle20160006632See AlsoPiloted Well Clear Performance Evaluation of Detect and Avoid Systems with Suggestive Guidancevisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 291.100 What is the purpose of this part? This part: ( a ) Explains the procedures for filing a complaint with the Director, Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) alleging that a grantee or transporter has denied a shipper of production from the OCS open and nondiscriminatory access to a pipeline;
( b ) Explains the procedures BSEE will employ to determine whether violations of the requirements of the OCSLA have occurred, and to remedy any violations; and
( c ) Provides for alternative informal means of resolving pipeline access disputes through either Hotline-assisted procedures or alternative dispute resolution (ADR).
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1506 How often must I train my employees? You determine the frequency of the training you provide your employees. You must do all of the following: ( a ) Provide periodic training to ensure that employees maintain understanding of, and competency in, well control, deepwater well control, or production safety practices;
( b ) Establish procedures to verify adequate retention of the knowledge and skills that employees need to perform their assigned well control, deepwater well control, or production safety duties; and
( c ) Ensure that your contractors' training programs provide for periodic training and verification of well control, deepwater well control, or production safety knowledge and skills.
#### § 285.110 How do I submit applications, reports, or notices required by this part?

Unless otherwise stated, you must submit one electronic copy of all plans, applications, reports, or notices required by this part to BSEE. BSEE will inform you if it requires paper copies of specific documents. Unless stated otherwise, documents should be submitted to the relevant contacts listed on the BSEE website. [89 FR 42713, May 15, 2024]
|  | (1) | The      report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2)  | The      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      October 9, 2009 | By:    | /s/      Robert DeCecco                                                                        |
|-----------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        |   | Robert      DeCecco                                                                            |
|                        |   | Chief      FinancialOfficer      (Principal Financial Officer and Principal AccountingOfficer) |

----
#### INDUSTRIAL & GENERAL TRUST, Limited, Appellant, v. TOD, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 10, 1905.)

Action by the Industrial & General Trust, Limited, against J. Kennedy Tod. S. Untermyer, for appellant. S. H. Olin, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

VAN BRUNT, P. J., dissents.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsVibrating-Wire, Supercooled Liquid Water Content Sensor Calibration and Characterization ProgressNASA conducted a winter 2015 field campaign using weather balloons at the NASA Glenn Research Center to generate a validation database for the NASA Icing Remote Sensing System. The weather balloons carried a specialized, disposable, vibrating-wire sensor to determine supercooled liquid water content aloft. Significant progress has been made to calibrate and characterize these sensors. Calibration testing of the vibrating-wire sensors was carried out in a specially developed, low-speed, icing wind tunnel, and the results were analyzed. The sensor ice accretion behavior was also documented and analyzed. Finally, post-campaign evaluation of the balloon soundings revealed a gradual drift in the sensor data with increasing altitude. This behavior was analyzed and a method to correct for the drift in the data was developed.Document ID20160012484Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsKing, Michael C.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Bognar, John A.*(Anasphere, Inc. Bozeman, MT, United States)*Guest, Daniel*(Anasphere, Inc. Bozeman, MT, United States)*Bunt, Fred*(Anasphere, Inc. Bozeman, MT, United States)*Date AcquiredOctober 21, 2016Publication DateOctober 1, 2016Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberGRC-E-DAA-TN33532E-19252NASA/TM-2016-219129Meeting InformationMeeting: Atmospheric and Space Environments ConferenceLocation: Washington, DCCountry: United StatesStart Date: June 13, 2016End Date: June 17, 2016Sponsors:American Inst. of Aeronautics and AstronauticsFunding Number(s)WBS: WBS 533127.02.02.03.02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.KeywordsIcingAviation MeterorologyBalloon-borne InstrumentsAvailable DownloadsNameType20160012484.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle20170000228See AlsoVibrating-Wire, Supercooled Liquid Water Content Sensor Calibration and Characterization Progressvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 550.272 If a State objects to the DPP's or DOCD's coastal zone consistency certification, what can I do? If an affected State objects to the coastal zone consistency certification accompanying your proposed or disapproved DPP or DOCD, you may do one of the following: ( a ) *Amend or resubmit your DPP or DOCD.* Amend or resubmit your DPP or DOCD to accommodate the State's objection and submit the amendment or resubmittal to the Regional Supervisor for approval. The amendment or resubmittal needs to only address information related to the State's objections.
( b ) *Appeal.* Appeal the State's objection to the Secretary of Commerce using the procedures in 15 CFR part 930, subpart H. The Secretary of Commerce will either: ( 1 ) Grant your appeal by finding under section 307(c)(3)(B)(iii) of the CZMA (16 U.S.C.1456(c)(3)(B)(iii)) that each activity described in detail in your DPP or DOCD is consistent with the objectives of the CZMA, or is otherwise necessary in the interest of National security; or
( 2 ) Deny your appeal, in which case you may amend or resubmit your DPP or DOCD, as described in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) *Withdraw your DPP or DOCD.* Withdraw your DPP or DOCD if you decide not to conduct your proposed development and production activities.
#### § 56.12023 Guarding electrical connections and resistor grids.

Electrical connections and resistor grids that are difficult or impractical to insulate shall be guarded, unless protection is provided by location.
#### QUINN, Respondent, v. CRUMLIN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 27, 1903.)

Action by James Quinn against William Crumlin, as president, etc.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
§ 1227.301 What are a State's responsibilities if it performs audits? If you perform audits you must: ( a ) Comply with the *ONRR Audit Procedures Manual* and the *Government Auditing Standards* issued by the Comptroller General of the United States;
( b ) Follow the ONRR Annual Audit Work Plan and 5-year Audit Strategy, which ONRR will develop in consultation with States having delegated audit authority;
( c ) Agree to undertake special audit initiatives ONRR identifies targeting specific royalty issues, such as valuation or volume determinations;
( d ) Prepare, construct, or compile audit work papers under the appropriate procedures, manuals, and guidelines;
( e ) Prepare and submit ONRR Audit Work Plans. You may modify your Audit Work Plans with ONRR approval; and
( f ) Comply with procedures for appealed demands or orders, including meeting timeframes, supplying information, and using the appropriate format.
[62 FR 43084, Aug. 12, 1997, as amended at 75 FR 61087, Oct. 4, 2010]
1667 K Street NW, Suite 300 | Washington, DC 20006 | www.cspa.org | p.202

- 872

- 8110 f. 202

- 223

- 2636 

### Draft Agenda CAPHRA Meeting with EPA Focus on Neurotoxicology and Pharmacodynamics November 7, 2013 EPA Headquarters, Crystal City, VA 10:00 am

- 12 : 00 pm EDT

I. Introductions

– 5 ’
II. Update on Overall Program

- 15 ’
III. Ph armacodynamic s

– in vivo Acoustic St artle Response

– 15 ’
IV. Pharmacodynamics

– in vitro

a. Human

– 10’
b. *Rat neurolemma

– 50’
V. Discussion

- 20’
VI. Fut ure meetings

– 5’

*Drs. John Clark (University of Massachusets and Steve Symington (Salve Regina University), collaborators with CAPHRA will lead t hese discussions.
#### Adele Leogrande, as Administratrix of the Estate of Frank Leogrande, Deceased, Respondent, v. Long Island Lighting Company, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death and conscious pain and suffering, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 10, 1960, granting a preference in trial, pursuant to rule 151 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order reversed, without costs, and motion denied. In our opinion, the showing of indigence or pressing need is insufficient to warrant the exercise of discretion in granting the preference. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
### §44915. Exemptions

The Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration may exempt from sections 44901, 44903(a)–(c) and (e), 44906, 44935, and 44936 of this title airports in Alaska served only by air carriers that—

(1) hold certificates issued under section 41102 of this title;

(2) operate aircraft with certificates for a maximum gross takeoff weight of less than 12,500 pounds; and

(3) board passengers, or load property intended to be carried in an aircraft cabin, that will be screened under section 44901 of this title at another airport in Alaska before the passengers board, or the property is loaded on, an aircraft for a place outside Alaska.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1215; Pub. L. 107–71, title I, §101(f)(7), (9), Nov. 19, 2001, 115 Stat. 603; Pub. L. 115–254, div. K, title I, §1991(d)(13), Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3635.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 44915 | 49 App.:1358. | Aug. 23, 1958, Pub. L. 85–726, 72 Stat. 731, §317; added July 12, 1976, Pub. L. 94–353, §17(a), 90 Stat. 882. |

Section

In clause (1), the word "issued" is substituted for "granted" for consistency in this part. The words "by the Civil Aeronautics Board" are omitted as surplus.

Clause (3) is substituted for 49 App.:1358 (words after 3d comma) for consistency in the revised title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–254 substituted "Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration" for "Under Secretary of Transportation for Security" in introductory provisions.

2001—Pub. L. 107–71 substituted "Under Secretary of Transportation for Security" for "Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration" in introductory provisions.
§ 15.7 Approval marking. ( a ) An approved explosive or sheathed explosive unit shall be marketed only under the brand or trade name specified in the approval.
( b ) The wrapper of each cartridge and each case of approved explosives shall be legibly labeled with the following: the brand or trade name, “MSHA Approved Explosive”, the test detonator strength, and the minimum product firing temperature.
( c ) The outer covering of each sheathed explosive unit and each case of approved sheathed explosive units shall be legibly labeled with the following: the brand or trade name, “MSHA Approved Sheathed Explosive Unit”, the test detonator strength, and the minimum product firing temperature.
[53 FR 46761, Nov. 18, 1988; 54 FR 351, Jan. 5, 1989; 54 FR 27641, June 30, 1989; 60 FR 33723, June 29, 1995]
### §30106. Rented or leased motor vehicle safety and responsibility

(a) In General.—An owner of a motor vehicle that rents or leases the vehicle to a person (or an affiliate of the owner) shall not be liable under the law of any State or political subdivision thereof, by reason of being the owner of the vehicle (or an affiliate of the owner), for harm to persons or property that results or arises out of the use, operation, or possession of the vehicle during the period of the rental or lease, if—

(1) the owner (or an affiliate of the owner) is engaged in the trade or business of renting or leasing motor vehicles; and

(2) there is no negligence or criminal wrongdoing on the part of the owner (or an affiliate of the owner).

(b) Financial Responsibility Laws.—Nothing in this section supersedes the law of any State or political subdivision thereof—

(1) imposing financial responsibility or insurance standards on the owner of a motor vehicle for the privilege of registering and operating a motor vehicle; or

(2) imposing liability on business entities engaged in the trade or business of renting or leasing motor vehicles for failure to meet the financial responsibility or liability insurance requirements under State law.

(c) Applicability and Effective Date.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, this section shall apply with respect to any action commenced on or after the date of enactment of this section without regard to whether the harm that is the subject of the action, or the conduct that caused the harm, occurred before such date of enactment.

(d) Definitions.—In this section, the following definitions apply:

(1) Affiliate.—The term "affiliate" means a person other than the owner that directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the owner. In the preceding sentence, the term "control" means the power to direct the management and policies of a person whether through ownership of voting securities or otherwise.

(2) Owner.—The term "owner" means a person who is—

(A) a record or beneficial owner, holder of title, lessor, or lessee of a motor vehicle;

(B) entitled to the use and possession of a motor vehicle subject to a security interest in another person; or

(C) a lessor, lessee, or a bailee of a motor vehicle, in the trade or business of renting or leasing motor vehicles, having the use or possession thereof, under a lease, bailment, or otherwise.

(3) Person.—The term "person" means any individual, corporation, company, limited liability company, trust, association, firm, partnership, society, joint stock company, or any other entity.

(Added Pub. L. 109–59, title X, §10208(a), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1935.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of enactment of this section, referred to in subsec. (c), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 109–59, which was approved Aug. 10, 2005.
§ 45.2 Definitions. As used in this part: ( a ) *Act* means the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, Pub. L. 91-173, as amended by Pub. L. 95-164;
( b ) *District Manager* means the District Manager of the Mine Safety and Health Administration District in which the independent contractor is located;
( c ) *Independent contractor* means any person, partnership, corporation, subsidiary of a corporation, firm, association or other organization that contracts to perform services or construction at a mine; and,
( d ) *Production-operator* means any owner, lessee, or other person who operates, controls or supervises a coal or other mine.
§ 550.224 What information on support vessels, offshore vehicles, and aircraft you will use must accompany the EP? The following information on the support vessels, offshore vehicles, and aircraft you will use must accompany your EP: ( a ) *General.* A description of the crew boats, supply boats, anchor handling vessels, tug boats, barges, ice management vessels, other vessels, offshore vehicles, and aircraft you will use to support your exploration activities. The description of vessels and offshore vehicles must estimate the storage capacity of their fuel tanks and the frequency of their visits to your drilling unit.
( b ) *Air emissions.* A table showing the source, composition, frequency, and duration of the air emissions likely to be generated by the support vessels, offshore vehicles, and aircraft you will use that will operate within 25 miles of your drilling unit.
( c ) *Drilling fluids and chemical products transportation.* A description of the transportation method and quantities of drilling fluids and chemical products (see § 550.213(b) and (c)) you will transport from the onshore support facilities you will use to your drilling unit.
( d ) *Solid and liquid wastes transportation.* A description of the transportation method and a brief description of the composition, quantities, and destination(s) of solid and liquid wastes (see § 550.217(a)) you will transport from your drilling unit.
( e ) *Vicinity map.* A map showing the location of your proposed exploration activities relative to the shoreline. The map must depict the primary route(s) the support vessels and aircraft will use when traveling between the onshore support facilities you will use and your drilling unit.
#### NORTHRIP, Respondent, v. HEALEY, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 1, 1905.)

Action by Charles R. Northrip against Henry H. Healey. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### § 401.2 Delegation of authority.

The State Water Research Institute Program, as authorized by section 104 of the Act, has been established as a component of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Secretary of the Interior has delegated to the Director of the USGS authority to take the actions and make the determinations that, under the Act, are the responsibility of the Secretary.