alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 291.104 Who may file a complaint or a third-party brief? ( a ) You may file a complaint under this subpart if you are a shipper and you believe that you have been denied open and nondiscriminatory access to an OCSLA pipeline that is not a FERC pipeline.
( b ) Any person that believes its interests may be affected by precedents established by adjudication of complaints under this rule may submit a brief to BSEE. The brief must be served following the procedure set out in § 291.107. After considering the brief, it is within BSEE's discretion as to whether BSEE may: ( 1 ) Address the brief in its decision;
( 2 ) Not address the brief in its decision; or
( 3 ) Include the submitter of the brief in the proceeding as a party.
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.874 Subsea water injection systems. If you choose to install a subsea water injection system, your system must comply with your approved DWOP, which must meet the following minimum requirements: ( a ) Adhere to the water injection requirements described in API RP 14C (incorporated by reference as specified in § 250.198) for the water injection equipment located on the platform. In accordance with § 250.830, either a surface-controlled SSSV or a water injection valve (WIV) that is self-activated and not controlled by emergency shut-down (ESD) or sensor activation must be installed in a subsea water injection well.
( b ) Equip a water injection pipeline with a surface FSV and water injection shutdown valve (WISDV) on the surface facility.
( c ) Install a PSHL sensor upstream (in-board) of the FSV and WISDV.
( d ) Use subsea tree(s), wellhead(s), connector(s), and tree valves, and surface-controlled SSSV or WIV associated with a water injection system that are rated for the maximum anticipated injection pressure.
( e ) Consider the effects of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) when designing your water flood system, as required by § 250.805.
( f ) Follow the valve closure times and hydraulic bleed requirements according to your approved DWOP for the following: ( 1 ) Electro-hydraulic control system with water injection,
( 2 ) Electro-hydraulic control system with water injection with loss of communications, and
( 3 ) Direct-hydraulic control system with water injection.
( g ) Comply with the following injection valve testing requirements: ( 1 ) You must test your injection valves as provided in the following table: Valve
Allowable leakage rate
Testing frequency (i) WISDV
Zero leakage
Monthly, not to exceed 6 weeks between tests. (ii) Surface-controlled SSSV or WIV
400 cc per minute of liquid or15 scf per minute of gas
Semiannually, not to exceed6 calendar months between tests.
( 2 ) If a designated USV on a water injection well fails the applicable test under § 250.880(c)(4)(ii), you must notify the appropriate District Manager and request approval to designate another ANSI/API Spec 6A and API Spec. 6AV1 (both incorporated by reference in § 250.198) certified subsea valve as your USV.
( 3 ) If a USV on a water injection well fails the test and the surface-controlled SSSV or WIV cannot be tested as required under (g)(1)(ii) of this section because of low reservoir pressure, you must submit a request to the appropriate District Manager with an alternative plan that ensures subsea shutdown capabilities.
( h ) If you experience a loss of communications during water injection operations, you must comply with the following: ( 1 ) Notify the appropriate District Manager within 12 hours after detecting loss of communication; and
( 2 ) Obtain approval from the appropriate District Manager to continue to inject during the loss of communication.
[81 FR 60918, Sept. 7, 2016, as amended at 83 FR 49262, Sept. 28, 2018]
§ 551.10 Penalties and appeals. ( a ) *Penalties for noncompliance under a permit issued by BOEM.* You are subject to the penalty provisions of: ( 1 ) Section 24 of the Act (43 U.S.C. 1350); and
( 2 ) The procedures contained in 30 CFR part 550, subpart N, for noncompliance with: ( i ) Any provision of the Act;
( ii ) Any provision of a G&G or drilling permit; or
( iii ) Any regulation or order issued under the Act.
( b ) *Penalties under other laws and regulations.* The penalties prescribed in this section are in addition to any other penalty imposed by any other law or regulation.
( c ) *Procedures to appeal orders or decisions BOEM issues.* See 30 CFR part 590 for instructions on how to appeal any order or decision that we issue under this part.
§ 285.812 How must I implement my SMS? ( a ) Your SMS must be functional before you begin, and must remain functional while you perform, any activity on the OCS pursuant to a lease, including met buoy placement and site assessment work, or for any activities described in your approved SAP, COP, or GAP. You must conduct all activities described in your approved SAP, COP, or GAP in accordance with the SMS you described under § 285.810.
( b ) You must regularly demonstrate to BSEE that your SMS is being implemented effectively by submitting the following to BSEE in accordance with § 285.110: ( 1 ) By March 31st of each year, summarize safety and work hour performance data for the prior calendar year in which you conducted site assessment, construction, operations, or decommissioning activities in accordance with your lease terms, using a form available on the BSEE website; and
( 2 ) Once every 3 years and upon BSEE's request, provide a report to BSEE summarizing the results of your most recent SMS audit, corrective actions implemented or being implemented as a result of that audit, and an updated description of your SMS highlighting changes that were made since the last such submission to BSEE.
[89 FR 42720, May 15, 2024]
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.825 Subsea tree subsurface safety devices—general. ( a ) For wells using subsea (wet) trees or for which you intend to install subsea trees, you must equip all tubing installations open to hydrocarbon-bearing zones with subsurface safety devices that will shut off the flow from the well in the event of an emergency. You must also install flow couplings above and below the subsurface safety devices. For instances where the well at issue is incapable of natural flow, you may seek District Manager approval for using alternative procedures or equipment, if you propose to use a subsea safety system that is not capable of shutting off the flow from the well in the event of an emergency. Subsurface safety devices include the following and any associated safety valve lock and landing nipple: ( 1 ) A surface-controlled SSSV;
( 2 ) An injection valve;
( 3 ) A tubing plug; and
( 4 ) A tubing/annular subsurface safety device.
( b ) After installing the subsea tree, but before the rig or installation vessel leaves the area, you must test all valves and sensors to ensure that they are operating as designed and meet all the conditions specified in this subpart.
§ 970.27 De minimis exception to demolition requirements. ( a ) A PHA may demolish units without submitting an application if the PHA is proposing to demolish not more than the lesser of: ( 1 ) five dwelling units; or
( 2 ) 5 percent of the total dwelling units owned by the PHA over any 5-year period.
( b ) The 5-year period referred to in paragraph (a)(2) of this section is the 5 years counting backward from the date of the proposed de minimis demolition, except that any demolition performed prior to October 21, 1998, will not be counted against the five units or 5 percent of the total, as applicable. For example, if a PHA that owns 1,000 housing units wishes to demolish units under this de minimis provision on July 1, 2004, and previously demolished two units under this provision on September 1, 2000, and two more units on July 1, 2001, the PHA would be able to demolish one additional unit for a total of five in the preceding 5 years. As another example, if a PHA that owns 60 housing units as of July 1, 2004, had demolished two units on September 1, 2000, and one unit on July 1, 2001, that PHA would not be able to demolish any further units under this “de minimis” provision until after September 1, 2005, because it would have already demolished 5 percent of its total.
( c ) ( 1 ) In order to qualify for this exemption, the space occupied by the demolished unit must be used for meeting the service or other needs of public housing residents (use of space to construct a laundry facility, community center, child care facility, office space for a general provider; or for use as open space or garden); or
( 2 ) The unit being demolished must be beyond repair.
( d ) PHAs utilizing this section will comply with environmental review requirements at 24 CFR 970.13 and, if applicable, the requirements of 24 CFR 8.23.
( e ) For recordkeeping purposes, PHAs that wish to demolish units under this section shall submit the information required in § 970.7(a)(1), (2), (12), (13), and (14). HUD will accept a certification from the PHA that one of the two conditions in paragraph (c) of this section apply unless HUD has independent information that requirements for “de minimis” demolition have not been met.
[71 FR 62362, Oct. 24, 2006, as amended at 73 FR 3868, Jan. 23, 2008]
### §32914. Collecting civil penalties

(a) Civil Actions.—If a person does not pay a civil penalty after it becomes a final order of the Secretary of Transportation or a judgment of a court of appeals of the United States for a circuit, the Attorney General shall bring a civil action in an appropriate district court of the United States to collect the penalty. The validity and appropriateness of the final order imposing the penalty is not reviewable in the action.

(b) Priority of Claims.—A claim of a creditor against a bankrupt or insolvent manufacturer of automobiles has priority over a claim of the United States Government against the manufacturer for a civil penalty under section 32912(b) of this title when the creditor's claim is for credit extended before a final judgment (without regard to section 32913(b)(1) and (2) of this title) in an action to collect under subsection (a) of this section.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1074.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 32914(a) | 15:2008(b)(3) (last sentence), (c)(2). | Oct. 20, 1972, Pub. L. 92–513, 86 Stat. 947, §508(b)(3) (last sentence), (6), (c)(2); added Dec. 22, 1975, Pub. L. 94–163, §301, 89 Stat. 913, 914. |
| 32914(b) | 15:2008(b)(6). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the text of 15:2008(b)(3) (last sentence) is omitted as surplus because of 28:516 and 2461(a). The words "an assessment of" and "and unappealable" are omitted as surplus. The words "of the Secretary of Transportation" are added for clarity. The words "for a circuit" are added for consistency. The words "in favor of the Secretary" are omitted as surplus. The words "shall bring a civil action . . . to collect the penalty" are substituted for "shall recover the amount for which the manufacturer is liable" for consistency.

In subsection (b), the words "A claim of a creditor against a bankrupt or insolvent manufacturer of automobiles has priority over a claim of the United States Government against the manufacturer" are substituted for "A claim of the United States . . . against a manufacturer . . . shall, in the case of the bankruptcy or insolvency of such manufacturer, be subordinate to any claim of a creditor of such manufacturer" for clarity and to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "the date on which" are omitted as surplus.
#### § 56.12047 Guy wires.

Guy wires of poles supporting high-voltage transmission lines shall meet the requirements for grounding or insulator protection of the National Electrical Safety Code, part 2, entitled “Safety Rules for the Installation and Maintenance of Electric Supply and Communication Lines” (also referred to as National Bureau of Standards Handbook 81, November 1, 1961) and Supplement 2 thereof issued March 1968, which are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part hereof. These publications and documents may be obtained from the National Institute of Science and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 3460, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-3460. Telephone: 301-975-6478 (not a toll free number); *http://ts.nist.gov/nvl;* or from the Government Printing Office, Information Dissemination (Superintendent of Documents), P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954; Telephone: 866-512-1800 (toll free) or 202-512-1800, *http://bookstore.gpo.gov*, or may be examined in any Metal and Nonmetal Mine Safety and Health District Office of the Mine Safety and Health Administration.

[50 FR 4054, Jan. 29, 1985, as amended at 60 FR 35695, July 11, 1995; 71 FR 16667, Apr. 3, 2006]
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

The undersigned herebycertifies that the Form 10-Q Quarterly Report of Eldorado Resorts LLC andEldorado Capital Corp. (collectively, the “Company”) for the quarterly periodended March 31, 2004 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: May 12, 2004 | By:    | /s/ Robert M. Jones                       |   |
|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|                |   | Robert M. Jones, Chief  Financial Officer |
|                |   | of Eldorado Resorts LLC                   |

 

----
#### § 35.23 Performance required for certification.

To qualify as fire-resistant under the regulations of this part, a hydraulic fluid shall meet each performance requirement and stated in §§ 35.20(d), 35.21(d), and 35.22(d).
### §1408. Legislative authority to create authorities; appointment of members; powers of authorities

The government of the Virgin Islands, through its legislative assembly, may grant to a public corporate authority existing or to be created through said assembly, exclusive authority to undertake slum clearance, urban redevelopment, urban renewal, and low-rent housing activities within the municipalities of the Virgin Islands. The legislative assembly may provide for the appointment and terms of office of the members of such authority and for the powers of such authority, including authority to accept whatever benefits the Federal Government may make available under the Housing Act of 1949 (Public Law 171, Eighty-First Congress), as amended [42 U.S.C. 1441 et seq.], or any other law, for projects contemplated by this Act, as amended, and to do all things, to exercise any and all powers, and to assume and fulfill any and all obligations, duties, responsibilities, and requirements, including but not limited to those relating to planning or zoning, necessary or desirable for receiving such Federal assistance, except that such authority shall not be given any power of taxation, nor any power to pledge the faith and credit of the people of the Virgin Islands for any loan whatever.

(July 18, 1950, ch. 466, title III, §301, 64 Stat. 346; Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 783, title I, §107(5), (7), (9), 69 Stat. 638.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Housing Act of 1949 (Public Law 171, Eighty-First Congress), as amended, referred to in text, is act July 15, 1949, ch. 338, 63 Stat. 413, which is classified principally to chapter 8A (§1441 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1441 of Title 42 and Tables.

This Act, referred to in text, means act July 18, 1950, ch. 466, 64 Stat. 344, known as the Territorial Enabling Act of 1950, which enacted this subchapter and sections 480 to 480b, 483a, 483b, 721 to 721b, and 910 to 910b of this title, amended sections 481 to 483 and 722 of this title, and enacted provisions set out as notes under sections 480, 481, and 722 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Amendments

1955—Act Aug. 11, 1955, included urban renewal projects, and inserted "as amended" after "Housing Act of 1949" and after "this Act".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Urban Renewal Activities

Act Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 783, title I, §107(4), 69 Stat. 638, amended the heading of title III of the Territorial Enabling Act of 1950, this subchapter, to insert the words "urban renewal" in order to make financial assistance available for urban renewal projects.
#### In the Matter of Leopold Stokowski, Appellant, against Gloria V. Lumet, Respondent.

Order appealed from unanimously modified on the law and on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, as follows: Paragraph “C.4” of the second ordering paragraph is modified by deleting therefrom the words “ for four (4) consecutive weeks during either July or August, provided that he shall notify the respondent, in writing, of his choice on or before the first day of February of each such year” and inserting the words “for the months of July and August ”; deleting the words “ four (4) weeks ” and “four (4) week”, so that such paragraph will read: “In each year commencing 1960, petitioner shall have the right to have said infant sons with Mm for the months of July and August. Petitioner shall also furnish respondent, in writing, with a detailed itinerary of said infant sons for said period, as soon as known, and keep respondent advised as to their whereabouts. For the purpose of each such visitation period, petitioner shall call for said mfant sons at 10 :00 a.m at the lobby of respondent’s residence at 10 Grade Square, New York, N. Y., on the first day of such period, and shall return said infant sons to said place no later than 6:00 p.m. on the last day of such period.” Paragraphs “ C.5 ”, “C.6” and “ C.7 ” are stricken. The tMrd ordering paragraph is modified to strike therefrom *“*C.8 ” and to insert M place thereof the words “'C.4” as modified.” As so modified the order is otherwise affirmed, without costs to either party. We find nothing in this record to warrant the undue restrictions placed on petitioner’s rights of visitation. It is clear from the record that the parents have love and affection for these children and that these sentiments are reciprocated as to each. In light of the fact that respondent will have the children for 10 months of the year, it is only fair that petitioner should *653have the right td their care and companionship for two months.. In this way the guidance and counsel of the parents and the sharing of the children’s society will, it is hoped, aid the children in achieving a more normal life. However, it is our view, in light of the tender age of the infants, that general custody should be vested in respondent. Settle order. Concur — -Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Noonan, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**SAMUEL S. WALLACE,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 372 EAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 1st day of February, 2016, the Petition for Al lowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**

**Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this** 

**matter.**
§ 553.11 Who must demonstrate OSFR? ( a ) A designated applicant must demonstrate OSFR. A designated applicant may be a responsible party or another person authorized under this section. Each COF must have a single designated applicant. ( 1 ) If there is more than one responsible party, those responsible parties must use Form BOEM-1017 to select a designated applicant. The designated applicant must submit Form BOEM-1016 and agree to demonstrate OSFR on behalf of all the responsible parties.
( 2 ) If you are a designated applicant who is not a responsible party, you must agree to be liable for claims made under OPA jointly and severally with the responsible parties.
( b ) The designated applicant for a COF on a lease must be either: ( 1 ) A lessee; or
( 2 ) The designated operator for the OCS lease under 30 CFR 550.143 or the unit operator designated under a Federally approved unit including the OCS lease. For a lease or unit not in the OCS, the operator designated under the lease or unit operating agreement for the lease may be the designated applicant only if the operator has agreed to be responsible for compliance with all the laws and regulations applicable to the lease or unit.
( c ) The designated applicant for a COF on a permit must be the permittee.
( d ) The designated applicant for a COF on a RUE must be the holder of the RUE or, if there is a pipeline on the RUE, the owner or operator of the pipeline.
( e ) BOEM may require the designated applicant for a lease, permit, or RUE to be a person other than a person identified in paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section if BOEM determines that a person identified in paragraphs (b) through (d) cannot adequately demonstrate OSFR.
( f ) If you are a responsible party and you fail to designate an applicant, then you must demonstrate OSFR under the requirements of this part.
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.829 Subsurface safety devices in shut-in wells—subsea trees. ( a ) You must equip all new subsea tree completions (perforated but not placed on production) and completions shut-in for a period of 6 months with one of the following: ( 1 ) A pump-through-type tubing plug;
( 2 ) An injection valve capable of preventing backflow; or
( 3 ) A surface-controlled SSSV, provided the surface control has been rendered inoperative. For purposes of this section, a surface-controlled SSSV is considered inoperative if, for a direct hydraulic control system, you have bled the hydraulics from the control line and have isolated it from the hydraulic control pressure. If your controls employ an electro-hydraulic control umbilical and the hydraulic control pressure to the individual well cannot be isolated, a surface-controlled SSSV is considered inoperative if you perform the following: ( i ) Disable the control function of the surface-controlled SSSV within the logic of the programmable logic controller which controls the subsea well;
( ii ) Place a pressure alarm high on the control line to the surface-controlled SSSV of the subsea well; and
( iii ) Close the USV and at least one other tree valve on the subsea well.
( b ) When warranted by conditions, such as unstable bottom conditions, permafrost, hydrate formation, and paraffin problems, the District Manager must approve the setting depth of the subsurface safety device for a shut-in well on a case-by-case basis.
#### GRIFFIN, Respondent, v. BELISARIO, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

March 21, 1905.)

Action by Nathan D. Griffin against Benjamin H. Belisario. No opinion. Motion denied.