alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99(c)

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to

Household Finance Corporation ("HSBC" Finance")

HFC REVOLVING CORPORATION

HOUSEHOLD HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2004-1

	

	I, Steven H. Smith, Servicing Officer of HSBC Finance (the "Master Servicer"), DO HEREBY CERTIFY, in accordance with Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 22, 2004 among HFC Revolving Corporation, as Depositor, Household Home Equity Loan Trust 2004-1, Master Servicer and U.S. Bank, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as Administrator, (the "Agreement") that:

	1.  A review of the activities of the Master Servicer from July 22 through December 31, 2004 and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

	2.  To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its material obligations under the Agreement throughout such period. Based on such review, the Master Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, performed in all material respects its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period and no default in the performance of such obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth below.

			NONE

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate this 1st day of March, 2005.                              

 

					HSBC Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer

 

						/s/ Steven H. Smith			
					Steven H. Smith

					Servicing Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the Report), as
filed by Novatel Wireless, Inc. (the Company) with the Securities and Exchange Commission, each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                  
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 10, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/    PETER
LEPARULO                            
|                   |  |  |  | Peter Leparulo                                   
|                   |  |  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer             
|                   |  |  |  | (principal executive officer)                    
|                   |  | 
|                   |  |  |  | /s/    KENNETH
LEDDON                            
|                   |  |  |  | Kenneth Leddon                                   
|                   |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                   |  |  |  | (principal financial and accounting officer)     

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or
as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 4.3.19


                            CERTIFICATE OF SECRETARY

         I, JOHN M. LOWBER, the duly elected and acting Secretary of General
Communication, Inc., an Alaska corporation, do hereby certify and declare that
the resolution of the Board of Directors contained in the minutes of its meeting
attached hereto as Exhibit 4.3.19A is a true and correct copy of that resolution
as contained in those minutes duly adopted by the Board of Directors of General
Communication, Inc. at its meeting held on April 25, 2003.

         Executed this 24 day of June, 2003 at Anchorage, Alaska.

                                        GENERAL COMMUNICATION, INC.


                                        By: /s/
                                            John M. Lowber, Secretary


         SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this 24 day of June, 2003.



                                  /s/ C. Mills
                                  Notary Public in and for Alaska
                                  My Commission Expires: May 17, 2006
### §1956. Acquisition of defense sites

The provisions of title III of the Compact relating to future use by the United States of defense sites in Palau do not restrict the authority of the President of the United States to—

(1) request additional funding, subject to appropriation, related to the use of privately owned land in Palau pursuant to article II of title III of the Compact as may be appropriate in light of actual land use requirements, independent appraisals of such privately owned land accepted by both governments, and other appropriate documentation of actual land use costs; and

(2) consent to an extension of the time set forth in a subsidiary agreement to such article in which the Government of Palau is required to make such land available to the United States.

(Pub. L. 101–219, title I, §107, Dec. 12, 1989, 103 Stat. 1872.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Compact, referred to in text, is the Compact of Free Association between the United States and the Government of Palau, which is contained in section 201 of Pub. L. 99–658, set out as a note under section 1931 of this title.

#### Codification

Section was formerly set out as a note under section 1681 of this title.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3424 

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to interfering with 

the operation of an aircraft. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2005 

Mr. SESSIONS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to 

interfering with the operation of an aircraft. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pilot Protection Act 

5 of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INTERFERING WITH THE OPERATION OF AN AIR7 CRAFT. 

8 Section 32 of title 18, United States Code, is amend9 ed— 
2 

•HR 3424 IH 

1 (1) in subsection (a), by redesignating para2 graphs (5), (6), and (7) as paragraphs (6), (7), and 

3 (8) respectively; 

4 (2) by inserting after paragraph (4) of sub5 section (a), the following: 

6 ‘‘(5) interferes with or disables, with intent to 

7 endanger the safety of any person or with a reckless 

8 disregard for the safety of human life, anyone en9 gaged in the authorized operation of such aircraft or 

10 any air navigation facility aiding in the navigation of 

11 any such aircraft;’’; 

12 (3) in subsection (a)(8), by striking ‘‘para13 graphs (1) through (6)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraphs 

14 (1) through (7)’’; and 

15 (4) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘paragraphs 

16 (1) through (5)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraphs (1) 

17 through (6)’’. 

Æ
### §2104. Delegation

(a) The Secretary may delegate the duties and powers conferred by this subtitle to any officer, employee, or member of the Coast Guard, and may provide for the subdelegation of those duties and powers.

(b) When this subtitle authorizes an officer or employee of the Customs Service to act in place of a Coast Guard official, the Secretary may designate that officer or employee subject to the approval of the Secretary of the Treasury.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 506.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 2104 | 46:65v(1)46:382b46:41646:54346:689 |

46:382b

46:416

46:543

46:689

Section 2104 provides the Secretary with authority to delegate duties and powers to others. It also contains the authority to designate an officer or employee of the United States Customs Service to act in the place of a Coast Guard official.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of authorities, functions, personnel, and assets of the Coast Guard, including the authorities and functions of the Secretary of Transportation relating thereto, to the Department of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 468(b), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.

For transfer of functions, personnel, assets, and liabilities of the United States Customs Service of the Department of the Treasury, including functions of the Secretary of the Treasury relating thereto, to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 203(1), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6. For establishment of U.S. Customs and Border Protection in the Department of Homeland Security, treated as if included in Pub. L. 107–296 as of Nov. 25, 2002, see section 211 of Title 6, as amended generally by Pub. L. 114–125, and section 802(b) of Pub. L. 114–125, set out as a note under section 211 of Title 6.
§ 203.85 What is in an economic viability and relief justification report? This report should show that your project appears economic without royalties and sunk costs using the RSVP model we provide. The format of the report and the assumptions and parameters we specify are found in the “Guidelines for the Application, Review, Approval and Administration of the Deep Water Royalty Relief Program,” U.S. Department of the Interior, BSEE. Clearly justify each parameter you set in every scenario you specify in the RSVP. You may provide supplemental information, including your own model and results. The economic viability and relief justification report must contain the following items for an oil and gas lease. ( a ) Economic assumptions we provide which include: ( 1 ) Starting oil and gas prices;
( 2 ) Real price growth;
( 3 ) Real cost growth or decline rate, if any;
( 4 ) Base year;
( 5 ) Range of discount rates; and
( 6 ) Tax rate (for use in determining after-tax sunk costs).
( b ) Analysis of projected cash flow (from the date of the application using annual totals and constant dollar values) which shows: ( 1 ) Oil and gas production;
( 2 ) Total revenues;
( 3 ) Capital expenditures;
( 4 ) Operating costs;
( 5 ) Transportation costs; and
( 6 ) Before-tax net cash flow without royalties, overrides, sunk costs, and ineligible costs.
( c ) Discounted values which include: ( 1 ) Discount rate used (selected from within the range we specify).
( 2 ) Before-tax net present value without royalties, overrides, sunk costs, and ineligible costs.
( d ) Demonstrations that: ( 1 ) All costs, gross production, and scheduling are consistent with the data in the G&G, engineering, production, and cost reports (§§ 203.86 through 203.89) and
( 2 ) The development and production scenarios provided in the various reports are consistent with each other and with the proposed development system. You can use up to three scenarios (conservative, most likely, and optimistic), but you must link each to a specific range on the distribution of resources from the RSVP Resource Module.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.1

                                Peter R. Kellogg
                                  120 Broadway
                               New York, NY 10271

netGuru, Inc.
22700 Savi Ranch Parkway
Yorba Linda, CA 92887

Att. Bruce Nelson, CFO Re. Financing Revolving Line of Credit

Gentlemen:

I, Peter R. Kellogg, have approved your request for providing the credit
facility described above. Terms and conditions are as follows:

Lender:        Peter R. Kellogg
Borrower:      netGuru, Inc.
Amount:        $500,000.00

Credit FacilityLine of credit, Drawable in part or in full upon Borrower's
request. Draws will be by written notification sent to Lender three (3)
days prior to each draw date. Minimum draw will be $100,000/

Term           August 15, 2002 through March 31, 2003

Interest Rate  Interest shall be payable on all outstanding at the rate
               indicated

Total Outstanding Borrowings                  Interest Rate on All Outstanding

$100,000                                                WSJ       Prime+2
$200,000                                                          Prime+4
$300,000                                                          Prime+6
$400,000                                                          Prime+8
$500,000                                                          Prime+10

Interest shall be calculated on 365 days basis and shall be payable monthly.
This agreement shall become effective on August 15, 2002.

This commitment is valid until Monday, August 12, 2002 after which time it may
be considered null and void. If you intend to accept the commitment please
execute and return this letter by close of business on August 12, 2002.

                                                        Sincerely,
                                                        /s/ Peter R. Kellogg
                                                        --------------------

Agreed and accepted on this 12th day of August 2002.

netGuru, Inc.

By:  /s/  Jyoti Chatterjee
     ------------------------
     J. CHATTERJEE
Its President
#### Lamberto Lucarelli *v.*Paul M. Shapiro et al.

*Lamberto Lucarelli,*pro se, in support of the petition.

Decided October 30, 1992

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court is dismissed.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
                Company.




DateMay
                1, 2007
            By:
            */s/
              Charles W. Fritz*Name: Charles
                W. FritzTitle: Interim
                Chief Executive Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. and will be
      retained by NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, December 16, 2020.

# PLACE: 

The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

      ( print page 80860)    

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

                        In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.sec.gov.*

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the following topic:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Resolution of litigation claims; and

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings; and

Disclosure of non-public information.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: December 9, 2020.

Vanessa A. Countryman,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2020-27499 Filed 12-10-20; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
§ 886.331 Agreement to enter into housing assistance payments contract. ( a ) *Execution of agreement.* At the sales closing and prior to the Owner's commencement of any rehabilitation under this subpart, HUD will enter into an Agreement with the Owner which contains the following: ( 1 ) A statement that the Owner agrees to rehabilitate the project unit(s) to make the unit(s) decent, safe, and sanitary in accordance with the work write-up, cost estimates, and this subpart.
( 2 ) A date by which rehabilitation will have commenced and a deadline date by which the rehabilitated project unit(s) will be completed and ready for occupancy. The Agreement may provide for staged rehabilitation, occupancy, and payments under the contract.
( 3 ) The Contract Rent which will be paid to the Owner once rehabilitation is completed, the Contract is executed, and the unit(s) is/are occupied by an eligible family.
( 4 ) A date for final inspection of the unit(s) by HUD and the owner shall be specified. This date shall be as soon as possible after the deadline date specified pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
( 5 ) The term of the contract.
( b ) *Agreement part of sales contract.* The Agreement will be prepared by HUD and incorporated into the Contract of Sale and Purchase. The Agreement shall include all required information in paragraph (a) of this section and a statement specifying the Owner's responsibility for making relocation payments to Families temporarily displaced.
[44 FR 70365, Dec. 6, 1979, as amended at 58 FR 43722, Aug. 17, 1993]
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****Discover MyPlate curriculum: nutritioneducation for kindergarten. Look and cook recipe cards.
 
SuDoc Number:A 98.9:469/A-D
Item Number:0074-A-02 (online)
CGP System Number:000950961
 - Friendship     PocketCrunchy     Rainbow WrapFruit-a-licious     Breakfast CupFood     Group Friend
 
August 16, 2017**
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph James Murray, Alias John Murray, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction unanimously reversed on the law and facts, and new trial ordered and inter*879mediate order denying defendant’s motion to withdraw plea of guilty unanimously reversed and motion granted. Memorandum: After entering a plea of guilty to an indictment which charged him with the crime of grand larceny in the second degree committed by stealing an overcoat of the value of $125, defendant, before sentence, made a motion under section 337 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for an order permitting him to withdraw the plea of guilty and to substitute a plea of not guilty. Proof in support of his motion established that information obtained by defendant’s lawyer after the plea of guilty had been entered raised serious doubt that the overcoat which cost approximately $200, three or four years before it was taken and is valued by a used clothing dealer at $25 to $50 had a market value in excess of $100 when taken. Such proof indicates that defendant has a defense worthy of consideration by a jury. If a jury should find that the market value of the coat was not more than - $100 when taken, defendant would be entitled to a verdict acquitting him of the crime-of grand larceny in the second degree which applies only to the taking of property of the value of more than one hundred dollars. (Penal Law, § 1296, subd. 1; § 1305.) The ends of justice will best be served by submitting the case to a jury. Upon the present record, it does not appear that the rights of the People will be prejudiced by permitting defendant to withdraw his plea. Under the circumstances, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny appellant’s motion to withdraw his plea of guilty. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court convicting defendant of the crime of grand larceny, second degree. The orders denied defendant’s motion to withdraw a plea of guilty and substitute therefor a plea of not guilty; and also denied defendant’s motion for arrest of judgment.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.