alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §46310. Reporting and recordkeeping violations

(a) General Criminal Penalty.—An air carrier or an officer, agent, or employee of an air carrier shall be fined under title 18 for intentionally—

(1) failing to make a report or keep a record under this part;

(2) falsifying, mutilating, or altering a report or record under this part; or

(3) filing a false report or record under this part.

(b) Safety Regulation Criminal Penalty.—An air carrier or an officer, agent, or employee of an air carrier shall be fined under title 18, imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both, for intentionally falsifying or concealing a material fact, or inducing reliance on a false statement of material fact, in a report or record under section 44701(a) or (b) or any of sections 44702–44716 of this title.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1238; Pub. L. 103–429, §6(56), Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4385.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 46310 | 49 App.:1472(e). | Aug. 23, 1958, Pub. L. 85–726, §902(e), 72 Stat. 785; restated Sept. 30, 1987, Pub. L. 100–121, 101 Stat. 792. |

Section

In this section, the word "representative" is omitted as surplus. The words "account" and "memorandum" are omitted as being included in "record".

In subsection (a), before clause (1), the words "fined under title 18" are substituted for "fined not more than $5,000 in the case of an individual and not more than $10,000 in the case of a person other than an individual" for consistency in this section and with title 18.

In subsection (b), the words "or representation" are omitted a surplus.

#### Pub. L. 103–429

This amends 49:44711(a)(2)(B), (5), and (7) and 46310(b) to correct erroneous cross-references.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–429 inserted "any of sections" before "44702–44716".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–429 effective July 5, 1994, see section 9 of Pub. L. 103–429, set out as a note under section 321 of this title.
From: "leslie.riegle@aia

- aerospace.org" <leslie.riegle@aia

- aerospace.org>

To: "Lourdes.Maurice@faa.gov" <Lourdes.Maurice@faa.gov> Cc: Curtis Holsclaw <Curtis.Holsclaw@faa.gov>, "Ralph.Iovinelli@faa.gov" <Ralph.Iovinelli@faa.gov>,

Margo Oge/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Christopher Grundler/AA/USEPA/US@EPA, Rich Wilcox/AA/USEPA/US@EPA, Glenn Passavant/AA/USEPA/US@EPA, "Kevin.Welsh@faa.gov" <Kevin.Wels h@faa.gov>, Dan Elwell <dan.elwell@aia

- aerospace.org> Date: 02/23/2012 04:59 PM Subject: RE: NOx Emission Standards and Production Cut

- Off

Lourdes, et al.,

Please see the attached letter urging the FAA, EPA and OMB to expedite the rulemaking for the Environmental Protection Agency ’ s (EPA) Proposed Rule,

“ Control of Air Pollution From Aircraft and Aircraft Engines; Proposed
Emission Standards and Test Procedur es ”

.

We would like to offer any assistance that is appropriate to achieve this end. As mentioned in the letter, we intend to get back with you in further detail regarding the 6

- step process that was proposed.

I appreciate your patience, and hope this ma tter is resolved quickly and in a way that does not cause unnecessary complication.

Thank you,

Leslie

Leslie Riegle Director, Civil Aviation Environment & Security Aerospace Industries Association 1000 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1700 Arlington, VA 22209 (703) 358

- 1088

-------------------------------------------------------------------------- This communication, including any attachments, consists of non

- public information that is intended solely for use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed. I t is a Confidential communication that may contain information that is proprietary, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader is not the intended recipient, or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended rec ipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply e

- mail and delete the communication, including any attachments, from your system without saving any information or making any physical copies. Unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication, including any attachments, is strictlyprohibited.

[attachment "Letter to FAA RE EPA's NOx NPRM 2_23_2012.pdf ]
§ 556.401 What do I need to show to become qualified to hold a lease on the OCS and obtain a qualification number? ( a ) You may become qualified to hold a lease on the OCS and obtain a qualification number in accordance with § 556.402, if you submit evidence demonstrating that you are: ( 1 ) A natural person who is a citizen or national of the United States;
( 2 ) A natural person who is an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States, as defined in 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(20);
( 3 ) A private, public, or municipal corporation or Limited Liability Company or Limited Liability Corporation (either/both sometimes herein referred to as “LLC”) organized under the laws of any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any territory or insular possession subject to United States jurisdiction;
( 4 ) An association of such citizens, nationals, resident aliens, or corporations;
( 5 ) A State, the District of Columbia, or any territory or insular possession subject to United States jurisdiction;
( 6 ) A political subdivision of a State, the District of Columbia, or any territory or insular possession subject to United States jurisdiction; or
( 7 ) A Trust organized under the laws of any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any territory or insular possession subject to United States jurisdiction;
( b ) Statements and evidence submitted to demonstrate qualification under paragraphs (a)(1) through (6) of this section are subject to the penalties of 18 U.S.C. 1001.
( b ) BOEM may issue you a qualification number after you have provided evidence acceptable to BOEM.
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.194 How must I protect archaeological resources? ( a ) - ( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) If you discover any archaeological resource while conducting operations in the lease or right-of-way area, you must immediately halt operations within the area of the discovery and report the discovery to the BSEE Regional Director. If investigations determine that the resource is significant, the Regional Director will tell you how to protect it.
Exhibit 8.1
 PERCENTAGECOUNTRY OF
    
    
    OWNERSHIPNAME
    
    INCORPORATION
    
    
    INTERESTSubsidiaries:China Finance Online (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC
    
    
    100
    %Fortune Software (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC
    
    
    100
    %Fortune (Beijing) Wisdom Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC
    
    
    100
    %Fortune (Beijing) Success Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC
    
    
    100
    %Shenzhen Genius Information Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC
    
    
    100
    %Jujin Software (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC
    
    
    100
    %Juda Software (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC
    
    
    100
    %Stockstar Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC
    
    
    100
    %Zhengning Information & Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC
    
    
    100
    %Zhengtong
Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC
    
    
    100
    %Zhengyong
Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC
    
    
    100
    %Daily Growth Financial Holdings Limited
    
    BVI
    
    
    100
    %Giant Bright International Holdings Limited
    
    BVI
    
    
    100
    %Mount First Investments Limited
    
    BVI
    
    
    100
    %Mainfame Group Limited
    
    BVI
    
    
    100
    %Manca Development Limited
    
    BVI
    
    
    100
    %Team Gear Limited
    
    Hong Kong, PRC
    
    
    100
    %Kinco Limited
    
    Hong Kong, PRC
    
    
    100
    %Danford (H.K) Limited
    
    Hong Kong, PRC
    
    
    100
    %Kingford International Limited
    
    Hong Kong, PRC
    
    
    100
    %Asiaciti (H.K.) Limited
    
    Hong Kong, PRC
    
    
    100
    %Daily Growth Securities Limited
    
    Hong Kong, PRC
    
    
    100
    %Daily Growth Futures Limited
    
    Hong Kong, PRC
    
    
    100
    %Daily Growth Wealth Management Limited
    
    Hong Kong, PRC
    
    
    100
    %Daily Growth Investment Services Limited
    
    Hong Kong, PRC
    
    
    100
    %Variable interest entities:Beijing Fuhua Innovation Technology Investment Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC
    
    NilShanghai Shangtong Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC
    
    NilShanghai Chongzhi Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC
    
    NilShanghai Decheng Information & Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC
    
    NilBeijing Premium Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC
    
    NilBeijing Glory Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC
    
    NilHuifu Jinyuan Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC
    
    NilZhongcheng Futong Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC
    
    NilFortune (Beijing) Yingchuang Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC
    
    NilFortune (Beijing) Qicheng Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC
    
    NilBeijing Chuangying Advisory and Investment Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC
    
    NilShenzhen Newrand Securities Advisory and Investment Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC
    
    NilShenzhen Shangtong Software Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC
    
    NilSubsidiaries of variable interest entities:Shanghai Meining Computer Software Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC
    
    NilShenzhen Newrand Securities Training Center
    
    PRC
    
    NilShanghai
Securities Consulting Co., Ltd.
    
    PRC
    
    Nil
### §747. Public property transferred; "control" defined

All property which may have been acquired in Puerto Rico by the United States under the cession of Spain in the treaty of peace entered into on the 10th day of December 1898, in any public bridges, road houses, water powers, highways, unnavigable streams and the beds thereof, subterranean waters, mines or minerals under the surface of private lands, all property which at the time of the cession belonged, under the laws of Spain then in force, to the various harbor works boards of Puerto Rico, all the harbor shores, docks, slips, reclaimed lands, and all public lands and buildings not reserved by the United States for public purposes prior to March 2, 1917, is placed under the control of the government of Puerto Rico, to be administered for the benefit of the people of Puerto Rico; and the Legislature of Puerto Rico shall have authority, subject to the limitations imposed upon all its acts, to legislate with respect to all matters, as it may deem advisable. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, as used in this section "control" includes all right, title, and interest in and to and jurisdiction and authority over the aforesaid property and includes proprietary rights of ownership, and the rights of management, administration, leasing, use, and development of such property.

(Mar. 2, 1917, ch. 145, §7, 39 Stat. 954; May 17, 1932, ch. 190, 47 Stat. 158; Pub. L. 96–205, title VI, §606(b), Mar. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 91.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of that part of section 7 of act Mar. 2, 1917, preceding the proviso clause. The remainder of section 7 is classified to section 748 of this title.

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in act Apr. 12, 1900, ch. 191, §13, 31 Stat. 80.

#### Amendments

1980—Pub. L. 96–205 inserted provisions defining "control".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Puerto Rico" substituted in text for "Porto Rico" pursuant to act May 17, 1932, which is classified to section 731a of this title.
### §8702. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §112, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 633, which defined terms for this chapter, was omitted from the Code in view of termination of United States Synthetic Fuels Corporation. See note set out under section 8791 of this title.
### §11905. Disobedience to subpoenas

A person not obeying a subpoena or requirement of the Board to appear and testify or produce records shall be fined at least $100 but not more than $5,000, imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §102(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 852.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 11913 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

A prior section 11905, Pub. L. 95–473, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1459; Pub. L. 97–261, §29(e), Sept. 20, 1982, 96 Stat. 1128, related to transportation of passengers without charge, prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
#### In the Matter of Joseph Kaplan, Petitioner, v. William S. Hults, as Commissioner of the Bureau of Motor Vehicles of the State of New York, Respondent.

Motion by petitioner to dispense with printing of certain exhibits and documents. Motion granted to the extent of dispensing with the printing of the exhibits and documents enumerated in the supporting affidavit, except the minutes of the hearing. The minutes must be printed. The originals or photostat copies of the exhibits and documents not printed shall be submitted on the argument. On the court’s own motion, the proceeding is ordered on the calendar for the December Term, beginning November 28, 1960, and petitioner is given leave to submit a typewritten brief. Six copies of such brief must be filed and one copy served upon the Attorney-General on or before November 14, 1960. Beldoek, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
### §8. Repealed. July 16, 1947, ch. 256, §1, 61 Stat. 327

Section, R.S. §5269; acts Feb. 27, 1877, ch. 69, §1, 19 Stat. 252; June 19, 1934, ch. 652, §601, 48 Stat. 1101, related to refusal to transmit dispatches.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on tenth day following July 16, 1947, see section 3 of act July 16, 1947, set out as a note under sections 1 to 6 of this title.

#### Authority of Federal Communications Commission; Effect of Repeal

See provisions set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1300 What is the purpose of this subpart? This subpart explains how Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) leases are unitized. If you are an OCS lessee, use the regulations in this subpart for both competitive reservoir and unitization situations. The purpose of joint development and unitization is to: ( a ) Conserve natural resources;
( b ) Prevent waste; and/or
( c ) Protect correlative rights, including Federal royalty interests.
**EXHIBIT 10.29.3**

 

**Strictly Personal & Confidential**

 

28 April 2005 

 

David Fyfe 

Chief Executive Officer 

Cambridge Display Technology Inc. 

 

Dear David, 

 

I am writing to you formally to confirm the arrangements that exist withregard to retirement fund contributions made to you by the Company. 

 

As you are aware, the Company policy with regard to UK retirement funds is to match a 5% employee contribution (to a retirement fund), with a 5% employer contribution (to a retirement fund). In February 2004, the Compensation Committee ofthe Company agreed that you should receive 5% of your base salary as an employer contribution towards your retirement fund. 

 

As a result, the Company will contribute 5% of your base salary into the Company’s 401K Plan, where possible. In such circumstances that this (5%)figure exceeds the upper limits allowable under the terms of the Company’s 401K Plan, the difference between the amount the Company is able to contribute to the Plan within the confines of Plan limits, and 5% of your base salary will be paid toyou directly via the payroll. 

 

If you have any queries relatingto these pension arrangements, please do not hesitate to contact me. 

 

Yours sincerely, 

 

Emma Jones 

***VP, Human Resources & Facilities***
§ 402.11 Technology-development project applications. ( a ) Grant awards will be used to support those portions of the program for which the principal purpose is other than as described in § 402.11(b). Program announcements and applications will be governed by the same procedures provided in § 402.10.
( b ) If it is determined that the principal purpose of a planned award (or awards) is to acquire goods or services for the direct benefit or use of the Government, the action must be regarded as a procurement contract. A competitive solicitation prepared in accordance with applicable acquisition regulations will be issued to interested parties. Notification of the availability of any contract solicitation will be published in the Commerce Business Daily, unless waived in accordance with § 5.202 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). Contracts may be awarded without full and open competition only if justified in accordance with FAR subpart 6.3.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsWall interference tests of a CAST 10-2/DOA 2 airfoil in an adaptive-wall test sectionA wind-tunnel investigation of a CAST 10-2/DOA 2 airfoil model has been conducted in the adaptive-wall test section of the Langley 0.3-Meter Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel (TCT) and in the National Aeronautical Establishment High Reynolds Number Two-Dimensional Test Facility. The primary goal of the tests was to assess two different wall-interference correction techniques: adaptive test-section walls and classical analytical corrections. Tests were conducted over a Mach number range from 0.3 to 0.8 and over a chord Reynolds number range from 6 million to 70 million. The airfoil aerodynamic characteristics from the tests in the 0.3-m TCT have been corrected for wall interference by the movement of the adaptive walls. No additional corrections for any residual interference have been applied to the data, to allow comparison with the classically corrected data from the same model in the conventional National Aeronautical Establishment facility. The data are presented graphically in this report as integrated force-and-moment coefficients and chordwise pressure distributions.Document ID19880001390Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsMineck, Raymond E.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1987Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberL-16334NAS 1.15:4015NASA-TM-4015Accession Number88N10772Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-61-01-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19880001390.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOptimization of an Advanced Design Three-Element Airfoil at High Reynolds NumbersNew high-lift components have been designed for a three-element advanced high-lift research airfoil using a state-of-the-art computational method. The new components were designed with the aim to provide high maximum-lift values while maintaining attached flow on the single-segment flap at approach conditions. This three-element airfoil has been tested in the NASA Langley Low-Turbulence Pressure Tunnel at chord Reynolds number up to 16 million. The performance of the NASA research airfoil is compared to a reference advanced high-lift research airfoil. Effects of Reynolds number on slat and flap rigging have been studied experimentally. The performance trend of this new high-lift design is comparable to that predicted by the computational method over much of the angle of attack range. Nevertheless, the method did not accurately predict the airfoil performance or the configuration-based trends near maximum lift.Document ID19970012891Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsLin, John C.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Dominik, Chet J.*(McDonnell-Douglas Aerospace Long Beach, CA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1995Publication InformationPublisher: American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc.Subject CategorySolar PhysicsReport/Patent NumberAIAA Paper 95-1858NAS 1.15:112019NASA-TM-112019Meeting InformationMeeting: Applied AerodynamicsLocation: San Diego, CACountry: United StatesStart Date: June 19, 1995End Date: June 22, 1995Sponsors:American Inst. of Aeronautics and AstronauticsAccession Number97N17022Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970012891.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### KELSEY, Respondent, v. KELSEY, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 10, 1905.)

Action by Cora Kelsey against Arthur J. Kelsey. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Exhibit 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Rada Electronic Industries Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Adar
Azancot , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Adar Azancot *
-----------------------
Adar Azancot
-----------------------
Chief Executive Officer

June 30, 2003

*     The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at
      the Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon
      request.
#### Nader Aryeh, Appellant, v. 60 Wall Towers, Inc., Respondent.

Order entered on October 30, 1961 unanimously affirmed ,with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Steuer, JJ.