alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Ruth Bichowsky, Respondent, against Hickey Freeman Co. et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

— -Appeal by employer-carrier from a determination that claimant suffered an occupational disease. Claimant worked 29 years for the employer here involved in the same type of work which necessitated her coming in contact with wool used in men’s clothing. About two years before the claim for compensation she first experienced trouble in her chest from swimming in cold water. In 1956 she was out of work because of an asthmatic condition. On June 28,1957 she ceased work and her claim for compensation stated “Asthmatic condition aggravated by working on wool etc.”. The Referee and board found that exposure to wool dust in her occupation precipitated the disabling bronchial asthma. The word “ precipitated ” as used herein is a medical expression meaning “hastened”. We have previously determined that an asthmatic condition may be occupational, in nature when there was exposure to irritants to *878which claimant was allergic. *(Matter of Mayr*v. *Price,*9 A D 2d 801.) A doctor for the claimant testified: “Presumably she may have developed this allergy as a result of repeated exposure, but at the present time it is one of the substances to which she is allergic and which does definitely precipitate symptoms, so in that sense one would have to say the things she meets in her employment are producing symptoms and causing manifestations of disease and disability.” Another doctor for the claimant testified her occupation was an aggravating factor of the disability and the doctor for the appellants stated: “ They [allergic substances] may not make the disease worse but may aggravate the symptoms of that disease.” While the finding of the board is somewhat indefinite where as here the disease was occupational in nature and the medical testimony is in accord that the disability was due to precipitation and aggravation of bronchial asthma resulting from her employment, the delay in remitting the matter for more definite findings would serve no useful purpose. Decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board unanimously affirmed, with costs to the board against the appellant. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
#### § 285.632 What documents must I submit before I may construct and install facilities under my approved COP?

(a) You must submit to BSEE the documents listed in the following table:

| Document: | Requirements are found in: |
| --- | --- |
| (1) Facility Design Report | § 285.701 |
| (2) Fabrication and Installation Report | § 285.702 |

(b) You must submit your safety management system, as required by § 285.810.

(c) These activities must fall within the scope of your approved COP. If they do not fall within the scope of your approved COP, you will be required to submit a revision to your COP, under 30 CFR 585.634, for BOEM approval before commencing the activity.
§ 556.606 What must a lessee do if BOEM elects to extract helium from a lease? ( a ) BOEM reserves the ownership of, and the right to extract, helium from all gas produced from your OCS lease. Under section 12(f) of OCSLA (43 U.S.C. 1341(f)), upon our request, you must deliver all or a specified portion of the gas containing helium to BOEM at a point on the leased area or at an onshore processing facility that BOEM designates.
( b ) BOEM will determine reasonable compensation and pay you for any loss caused by the extraction of helium, except for the value of the helium itself. BOEM may erect, maintain, and operate on your lease any reduction work and other equipment necessary for helium extraction. Our extraction of helium will be conducted in a manner to not cause substantial delays in the delivery of gas to your purchaser.
Exhibit 10.5





	



Demand Promissory Note, dated May 18, 2022, in the principal amount of $10,000 from Bookmakers Company US, LLC payable to Victor Salerno 


 


Please refer to the accompanying Exhibit 10.5. It is saved in PDF format.
### §7111. Oral examinations for licenses

An individual may take an oral examination for a license to serve on a fishing, fish processing, or fish tender vessel not required to be inspected under part B of this subtitle.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 541; Pub. L. 98–364, title IV, §402(8)(B), July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 447; Pub. L. 99–307, §1(10), May 19, 1986, 100 Stat. 445.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 7109 | 46:224a(2) |

Section 7111 provides for oral tests for licenses for individuals on fishing vessels that are not required to be inspected under part B.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1986—Pub. L. 99–307 substituted "part" for "Part".

1984—Pub. L. 98–364 substituted in section catchline "Oral examinations for licenses" for "Licenses for fishing vessels not subject to inspection" and in text "An individual may take an oral examination for a license to serve on a fishing, fish processing, or fish tender vessel not required to be inspected under Part B of this subtitle" for "Examinations for licensing individuals on fishing vessels not required to be inspected under part B of this subtitle shall be oral".
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of FCStone Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert V. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                                          
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Robert V. Johnson                    
|    |  | Robert V. Johnson Chief Financial Officer



Date: November 29, 2007



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
***RETURN TO
INDEX***


Exhibit
32.1







The following
certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238. These
certifications shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be incorporated
by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.






**Certification
of Chief Executive Officer**




Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Weider Nutrition
International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to his knowledge, that:




(i)
    the
      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
      period ended February 28, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(ii)
    the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






Date: April
      8, 2005
    By: /s/ Bruce
      J. WoodBruce J.
      WoodPresident,
      Chief ExecutiveOfficer and
      Director








A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Weider Nutrition International, Inc. and will be retained by
Weider Nutrition International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




**Certification
of Chief Financial Officer**




Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Weider Nutrition
International, Inc. a Delaware, corporation (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to his knowledge, that:






(i)
    the
      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
      period ended February 28, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(ii)
    the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






Date: April
      8, 2005
    By: /s/
      Joseph W. BatyJoseph W.
      BatyExecutive
      Vice President andChief
      Financial Officer









A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Weider Nutrition International, Inc. and will be retained by
Weider Nutrition International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 18.33 Finish of surface joints.

Flat surfaces between bolt holes that form any part of a flame-arresting path shall be plane to within a maximum deviation of one-half the maximum clearance specified in § 18.31(a)(6). All metal surfaces forming a flame-arresting path shall be finished during the manufacturing process to not more than 250 microinches. A thin film of nonhardening preparation to inhibit rusting may be applied to these finished metal surfaces as long as the final surface can be readily wiped free of any foreign materials.

[57 FR 61210, Dec. 23, 1992]
§ 203.90 What is in a fabricator's confirmation report? This report shows you have committed in a timely way to the approved system for production. This report must include the following (or its equivalent for unconventionally acquired systems): ( a ) A copy of the contract(s) under which the fabrication yard is building the approved system for you;
( b ) A letter from the contractor building the system to the BSEE Regional Director for your region certifying when construction started on your system; and
( c ) Evidence of an appropriate down payment or equal action that you've started acquiring the approved system.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsRevisiting of Multiscale Static Analysis of Notched Laminates Using the Generalized Method of CellsComposite material systems generally exhibit a range of behavior on different length scales (from constituent level to macro); therefore, a multiscale framework is beneficial for the design and engineering of these material systems. The complex nature of the observed composite failure during experiments suggests the need for a three-dimensional (3D) multiscale model to attain a reliable prediction. However, the size of a multiscale three-dimensional finite element model can become prohibitively large and computationally costly. Two-dimensional (2D) models are preferred due to computational efficiency, especially if many different configurations have to be analyzed for an in-depth damage tolerance and durability design study. In this study, various 2D and 3D multiscale analyses will be employed to conduct a detailed investigation into the tensile failure of a given multidirectional, notched carbon fiber reinforced polymer laminate. Threedimensional finite element analysis is typically considered more accurate than a 2D finite element model, as compared with experiments. Nevertheless, in the absence of adequate mesh refinement, large differences may be observed between a 2D and 3D analysis, especially for a shear-dominated layup. This observed difference has not been widely addressed in previous literature and is the main focus of this paper.Document ID20160014805Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsNaghipour Ghezeljeh, Paria*(Ohio Aerospace Inst. Brook Park, OH, United States)*Arnold, Steven M.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Pineda, Evan J.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredDecember 22, 2016Publication DateDecember 1, 2016Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsComposite MaterialsReport/Patent NumberE-19323GRC-E-DAA-TN37717NASA/TM-2016-219435Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 826611.04.03.01CONTRACT_GRANT: NNC13BA10BDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.KeywordsMaterials EngineeringMultiscale ModelingMaterials ScienceAvailable DownloadsNameType20160014805.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<PAGE>
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           4,441
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  347,669
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,077
<INVENTORY>                                     63,354
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               461,215
<PP&E>                                         724,414
<DEPRECIATION>                               (373,709)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 994,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          476,517
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,498,190
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   994,768
<SALES>                                      2,666,148
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,666,148
<CGS>                                        1,334,042
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,549,195
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                80,155
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              95,546
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,798
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,798
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.196 Reimbursements for reproduction and processing costs. ( a ) BSEE will reimburse you for costs of reproducing data and information that the Regional Director requests if: ( 1 ) You deliver geophysical and geological (G&G) data and information to BSEE for the Regional Director to inspect or select and retain;
( 2 ) BSEE receives your request for reimbursement and the Regional Director determines that the requested reimbursement is proper; and
( 3 ) The cost is at your lowest rate or at the lowest commercial rate established in the area, whichever is less.
( b ) BSEE will reimburse you for the costs of processing geophysical information (that does not include cost of data acquisition): ( 1 ) If, at the request of the Regional Director, you processed the geophysical data or information in a form or manner other than that used in the normal conduct of business; or
( 2 ) If you collected the information under a permit that BSEE issued to you before October 1, 1985, and the Regional Director requests and retains the information.
( c ) When you request reimbursement, you must identify reproduction and processing costs separately from acquisition costs.
( d ) BSEE will not reimburse you for data acquisition costs or for the costs of analyzing or processing geological information or interpreting geological or geophysical information.
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.514 Well-control fluids, equipment, and operations. ( a ) Well-control fluids, equipment, and operations shall be designed, utilized, maintained, and/or tested as necessary to control the well in foreseeable conditions and circumstances, including subfreezing conditions. The well shall be continuously monitored during well-completion operations and shall not be left unattended at any time unless the well is shut in and secured.
( b ) The following well-control-fluid equipment shall be installed, maintained, and utilized: ( 1 ) A fill-up line above the uppermost BOP;
( 2 ) A well-control, fluid-volume measuring device for determining fluid volumes when filling the hole on trips; and
( 3 ) A recording mud-pit-level indicator to determine mud-pit-volume gains and losses. This indicator shall include both a visual and an audible warning device.
( c ) When coming out of the hole with drill pipe, the annulus shall be filled with well-control fluid before the change in such fluid level decreases the hydrostatic pressure 75 pounds per square inch (psi) or every five stands of drill pipe, whichever gives a lower decrease in hydrostatic pressure. The number of stands of drill pipe and drill collars that may be pulled prior to filling the hole and the equivalent well-control fluid volume shall be calculated and posted near the operator's station. A mechanical, volumetric, or electronic device for measuring the amount of well-control fluid required to fill the hole shall be utilized.
[76 FR 64462, Oct. 18, 2011, as amended at 77 FR 50894, Aug. 22, 2012; 81 FR 26021, Apr. 29, 2016]
#### FARUOLO v. RAFANELLI.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 6, 1903.)

1. Appeal from Municipal Court—Absolute Reversal—Allowance of Costs.

Where a judgment of the Municipal Court has been rendered without jurisdiction, so that on appeal it must be absolutely reversed, costs must be allowed appellant, under Municipal Court Act, § 345 (Laws 1902, p. 1590, c. 580), so providing, though respondent by written stipulation offered in the court below to allow a reversal without costs.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District.

. Action by Charles R. Faruolo against George Rafanelli. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Reversed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and BISCHOFF and BLANCHARD, JJ.

A. Finelite, for appellant.

P. S. Siatta, for respondent.

*550FREEDMAN, P. J.

In this action the respondent concedes that the court below did not render a judgment within the 14 days required by the statute, and that the judgment is a nullity. In such a case the court below loses jurisdiction, and, where an inferior court has rendered a judgment without jurisdiction, the appellate court may so far act as to reverse the judgment for want, of jurisdiction. MacMahon v. Rauhr, 47 N. Y. 67; Lambert v. Salomon, 28 Misc. Rep. 562, 59 N. Y. Supp: 676. The respondent urges, however, that, inasmuch as he at several times has by written stipulation offered to allow the judgment in 'the court below to be reversed without costs, this court should reverse the judgment, and grant a new trial, without costs. This we are without power to do. This court cannot confer jurisdiction over either of the parties or the subject-matter after the same has been lost by the trial court. In such a case an absolute reversal of the judgment must be granted, and in cases of an absolute reversal the prevailing party is entitled to costs. Section 345, Municipal Court Act (Laws 1902, p. 1590, c. 580); Harding v. Ellston, 19 Civ. Proc. R. 252, 13 N. Y. Supp. 549; Wood v. Brown, 6 Daly, 428. Had the respondent herein availed himself of the provisions of section 325 of the Municipal Court act (Laws 1902, p. 1583, c. 580), only the sum of $5 could have been taxed upon reversal.

Judgment reversed, with costs. All concur.
#### In the Matter of Broadway Maintenance Corp. v. Temporary Commission of Investigation of the State of New York.

Motion for a stay granted on condition that the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before January 19, 1961, with notice of argument for January 20, 1961, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Respondents’ points are to be served and filed on or before January 19, 1961. Concur—Breitel, J, P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
§ 550.1154 How do I determine if my reservoir is sensitive? ( a ) You must determine whether each reservoir is sensitive. You must classify the reservoir as sensitive if: ( 1 ) Under initial conditions it is an oil reservoir with an associated gas cap;
( 2 ) At any time there are near-critical fluids; or
( 3 ) The reservoir is undergoing enhanced recovery.
( b ) For the purposes of this subpart, near-critical fluids are: ( 1 ) Those fluids that occur in high temperature, high-pressure reservoirs where it is not possible to define the liquid-gas contact; or
( 2 ) Fluids in reservoirs that are near bubble point or dew point conditions.
( c ) The Regional Supervisor may reclassify a reservoir when available information warrants reclassification.
( d ) If available information indicates that a reservoir previously classified as non-sensitive is now sensitive, you must submit a request to the Regional Supervisor to reclassify the reservoir. You must include supporting information, as listed in the table in § 550.1167, with your request.
( e ) If information indicates that a reservoir previously classified as sensitive is now non-sensitive, you may submit a request to the Regional Supervisor to reclassify the reservoir. You must include supporting information, as listed in the table in § 550.1167, with your request.
### subpart i—general