alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

July 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131530 & (28)(29) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/ Justices Appellant, 

v SC: 131530 

 COA: 266039 

Oakland CC: 04-063179-CK 

TIMOTHY BROE, ELEANOR BROE and

BROE REHABILITATION SERVICES, 

INC., 

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs/

Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

The motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. On order of the Court, 

the application for leave to appeal the May 16, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented 

should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to stay the trial court proceedings is 

DENIED. 

p0725 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 26, 2006 

Clerk
#### § 22.0 Compliance with the requirements necessary for obtaining approval.

To receive approval of MSHA for any portable methane detectors a manufacturer must comply with the requirements specified in this part.
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1614 Mud program. ( a ) The quantities, characteristics, use, and testing of drilling mud and the related drilling procedures shall be designed and implemented to prevent the loss of well control.
( b ) The lessee shall comply with requirements concerning mud control, mud test and monitoring equipment, mud quantities, and safety precautions in enclosed mud handling areas as prescribed in §§ 250.455 through 250.459 of this part, except that the installation of an operable degasser in the mud system as required in § 250.456(g) is not required for sulphur operations.
#### § 203.65 How long will BSEE take to evaluate my application?

(a) We will determine within 20 working days if your application for royalty relief is complete. If your application is incomplete, we will explain in writing what it needs. If you withdraw a complete application, you may reapply.

(b) We will evaluate your first application on a field within 180 days, evaluate your first application on a development project or an expansion project within 150 days and evaluate a redetermination under § 203.75 within 120 days after we determine that it is complete.

(c) We may ask to extend the review period for your application under the conditions in the following table.

| If . . . | Then we may . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (1) We need more records to audit sunk costs, | Ask to extend the 120-day or 180-day evaluation period. The extension we request will equal the number of days between when you receive our request for records and the day we receive the records. |
| (2) We cannot evaluate your application for a valid reason, such as missing vital information or inconsistent or inconclusive supporting data, | Add another 30 days. We may add more than 30 days, but only if you agree. |
| (3) We need more data, explanations, or revision, | Ask to extend the 120-day or 180-day evaluation period. The extension we request will equal the number of days between when you receive our request and the day we receive the information. |

(d) We may change your assumptions under § 203.62 if our technical evaluation reveals others that are more appropriate. We may consult with you before a final decision and will explain any changes.

(e) We will notify all designated lease operators within a field when royalty relief is granted.
#### § 550.103 Where can I find more information about the requirements in this part?

BOEM may issue Notices to Lessees and Operators (NTLs) that clarify or provide more detail about certain regulatory requirements. NTLs may also outline what information you must provide, as required by regulation, in your various submissions to BOEM.

[89 FR 31586, Apr. 24, 2024]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 8, 2019

Order 

Clerk

January 8, 2019

157585(20)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 157585

v COA: 342154

Oakland CC: 2017-261877-FH

PAUL ROBERT MANIZAK,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of attorney Tracie Gittleman to extend the 

time for filing her Court-ordered response is GRANTED. The response will be accepted 

as timely filed if submitted on or before February 8, 2019.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2962 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise the eligibility criteria 

for presumption of service-connection of certain diseases and disabilities 

for veterans exposed to ionizing radiation during military service, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 17, 2005 

Mr. ABERCROMBIE (for himself, Mr. FILNER, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Mr. EVANS, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. HINCHEY, Ms. HOOLEY, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. MATHESON, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. SERRANO, 

and Mr. WEXLER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise the eligibility criteria for presumption of service-connection of 

certain diseases and disabilities for veterans exposed to 

ionizing radiation during military service, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Atomic Veterans Relief 

5 Act’’. 
2 

•HR 2962 IH 

1 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR PRESUMPTION OF 

2 SERVICE-CONNECTION RESULTING FROM EX3 POSURE TO IONIZING RADIATION DUE TO 

4 OPEN-AIR NUCLEAR TESTING. 

5 Section 1112(c)(3)(B) of title 38, United States 

6 Code, is amended by inserting before the period at the 

7 end of clause (i) the following: ‘‘or exposure to ionizing 

8 radiation due to residual contamination resulting from 

9 such a detonation’’. 

10 SEC. 3. REQUIREMENT TO ALLOW SERVICE-CONNECTION 

11 FOR DISABILITIES OF VETERANS EXPOSED 

12 TO IONIZING RADIATION WHILE IN MILITARY 

13 SERVICE TO BE ESTABLISHED WITHOUT 

14 DOSE RECONSTRUCTION RECORD. 

15 Section 1154 of title 38, United States Code, is 

16 amended by adding at the end the following new sub17 section: 

18 ‘‘(c)(1) The Secretary shall include in the regulations 

19 pertaining to service-connection of disabilities referred to 

20 in subsection (a) additional provisions to ensure, in the 

21 case of a claim by a radiation-exposed veteran for service22 connection of a nonpresumptive disability, that the proce23 dures for establishment of whether the disability is service24 connected do not require imputation to the veteran, 

25 through a process known as dose reconstruction, of any 

26 particular level of exposure to ionizing radiation. 
3 

•HR 2962 IH 

1 ‘‘(2) For purposes of this subsection: 

2 ‘‘(A) The term ‘radiation-exposed veteran’ has 

3 the meaning given that term in section 

4 1112(c)(3)(A) of this title. 

5 ‘‘(B) The term ‘nonpresumptive disability’ 

6 means a disability not specified in section 1112(c)(2) 

7 of this title.’’. 

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1













CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of ZAGG Inc (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Robert G. Pedersen II, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ROBERT G. PEDERSEN IIRobert G. Pedersen II

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

January 27, 2012




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 28.3 Installation, use, and maintenance of approved fuses.

Approved fuses shall be installed and maintained in accordance with the specifications prescribed by the manufacturer of the fuses, and shall be selected and used in accordance with the standards prescribed for short-circuit protective devices for trailing cables in Parts 75 and 77, Subchapter O of this chapter.
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.111 Who oversees operations under my welding plan?

A welding supervisor or a designated person in charge must be thoroughly familiar with your welding plan. This person must ensure that each welder is properly qualified according to the welding plan. This person also must inspect all welding equipment before welding.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-60259 Summary Calendar

CHARLES LAVEL STRINGER Plaintiff-Appellant v. WILLIAM BARNETT, BARBARA DUNN, JOHN WAITS, VICTORIA L. RUDLETT, DANIEL COKER HORTON & BELL, P.A., ET AL. Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:06-CV-663
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and DENNIS and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Charles Stringer, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals the dismissal ofvarious claims, including conspiracy, denial ofaccess to the courts, violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, and fraud. These claims arose out of a trial where he was found liable for a motor vehicle accident. He has United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 23, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 08-60259

2 sued the current defendants—the presiding judge, jurors, witnesses, lawyers, etc.—alleging that they were part of a “mock trial.” This appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Therefore, it is dismissed asfrivolous. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Given the Appellant’s extensive and unsuccessful litigation record, Appellant is warned that future filings of repeti tious or frivolous appeals may result in the imposition ofsanctions. These sanctions may include dismissal, monetary sanctions, and restrictions on his ability to file papers in this court and any court subject to this court's jurisdiction. DISMISSED.
PUBLIC LAW 110–164—DEC. 26, 2007 121 STAT. 2459 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3571: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007): 

Oct. 2, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 19, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–164 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To amend the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 to permit individuals who 

have served as employees of the Office of Compliance to serve as Executive 

Director, Deputy Executive Director, or General Counsel of the Office, and to 

permit individuals appointed to such positions to serve one additional term. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. PERMITTING FORMER OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE 

EMPLOYEES TO SERVE IN APPOINTED POSITIONS WITH 

OFFICE. 

Section 301(d)(2)(B) of the Congressional Accountability Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1381(d)(2)(B)) is amended by striking ‘‘legislative 

branch,’’ and inserting ‘‘legislative branch (other than the Office),’’. 

SEC. 2. PERMITTING ADDITIONAL TERM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, 

DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS, AND GENERAL COUNSEL 

OF OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.— 

(1) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR.—Section 302(a)(3) of the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1382(a)(3)) is 

amended by striking ‘‘a single term’’ and inserting ‘‘not more 

than 2 terms’’. 

(2) DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS.—Section 302(b)(2) of 

such Act (2 U.S.C. 1382(b)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘a single 

term’’ and inserting ‘‘not more than 2 terms’’. 

(3) GENERAL COUNSEL.—Section 302(c)(5) of such Act (2 

U.S.C. 1382(c)(5)) is amended by striking ‘‘a single term’’ and 

inserting ‘‘not more than 2 terms’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section 

shall apply with respect to an individual who is first appointed 

to the position of Executive Director, Deputy Executive Director, 

or General Counsel of the Office of Compliance after the date 

of the enactment of this Act. 

Approved December 26, 2007. 

2 USC 1382 note. 

Dec. 26, 2007 

[H.R. 3571] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29 with PUBLIC LAWS
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Derek R. McClain, certify that:

1.                I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trammell Crow Company;

2.                Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.                Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)                Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)               Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)                Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of  theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a)                All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)               Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: November 9, 2004 | /s/ DEREK R. MCCLAIN       |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------|
|                        | Derek R. McClain           |
| * *                    | *Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. ("Company") Quarterly Report
on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended September 30, 2006 ("Report"), the
undersigned certifies that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:      June 5, 2007

BY: /S/ ALBERT F. CASE, JR.
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


<PAGE>


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. ("Company") Quarterly Report
on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended September 30, 2006 ("Report"), the
undersigned certifies that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:      June 5, 2007


BY:    /S/ DEBI KOKINOS
---    ----------------
Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T19:04:10-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
02/03/201 1 15;3 5 FA X 202493514 2 

# < d U.S . Departmen

t o f Transportation Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 

### JA N 

### 2 4 

### 201 1 Vi aFacsimil e FA A

Easter n Regio n Onic e o f Regiona l Counse l * DM S @l001/00 2 

# OEjVE D JA M 

### 3 1 m : 

## 'FARIN G DOCK r I Aviatio n Plaz a Roo m56 1 Jamaica , N Y 1143 4 Telephone : 718-553-325 9 Facsimile : 718-995-569 9 Chie f Administrativ e La

w Judg e Ronni e A , Yode

r Oflic e o f Administrativ e La

w Judge s Ollic e o f Hearings . M-20 , U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 1200 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S-t . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloo r Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D.C . 2059 0 FA X 202-366-753 6 CX I I 

### V C O

Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n (Original an don e copy ) 800 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D.C . 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Room201 4 / 

### FAX202-493-514

2 CP'OWPi^' ^ / ^^'P * '^ ' ^ Re : I n th e Matte

r of Siege l Distributin g Compan y 2009WP70021 5 Dea r Chie f Judg e Yodcr

andHearin g Docke t

Clerk : Thi s i s t o confir

mthat th e partie s l o th e above-reference dmatte r hav e reache da settlement . Therefore , Respondent , Siege l Distributin g Company , withdraw s it s reques t fo r ahearin g an dth e Complainant , FAA , withdraw s it s complaint . Pleas e feel free t o cal l m c a t (718 ) 553-327 2 if

yo u hav e an

y question s or concerns .02/03/201 1 15;3 5 FA X 202493514 2 FA A * DM S 1002/00 2

Sincerely , Jednin e C . Gotimc r Attorne y cc : Vi aFacsimil e Zachar y J . Cohen Lesavo y Butz & Seitz , LLC Attorney s a

t Law 753 5 Windsor

Drive , Suit

e 20 0 Allentown , PA 1819 5 FA X (610 ) 530-272 7
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             133
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,919
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,548
<PP&E>                                         365,151
<DEPRECIATION>                                 108,869
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 280,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,925
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,596
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   280,632
<SALES>                                         44,728
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,728
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,084
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,512
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,569)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,569)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (4,569)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>