alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §53206. Payments

(a) Annual Payment.—

(1) In general.—The Secretary, subject to availability of appropriations and other provisions of this section, shall pay to the Contractor for an operating agreement, for each vessel that is covered by the operating agreement, an amount equal to $5,000,000 for each fiscal year 2021 through 2035.

(2) Timing.—This amount shall be paid in equal monthly installments at the end of each month. The amount shall not be reduced except as provided by this section or section 51307(b).

(b) Certification Required for Payment.—As a condition of receiving payment under this section for a fiscal year for a vessel, the Contractor for the vessel shall certify that the vessel has been and will be operated in accordance with section 53205(a)(1) for 365 days in each fiscal year. Up to thirty (30) days during which the vessel is drydocked, surveyed, inspected, or repaired shall be considered days of operation for purposes of this subsection.

(c) General Limitations.—The Secretary shall not make any payment under this chapter for a vessel with respect to any days for which the vessel is—

(1) not operated or maintained in accordance with an Operating Agreement under this chapter; or

(2) more than 40 years of age.

(d) Reductions in Payments.—With respect to payments under this chapter for a vessel covered by an Operating Agreement, the Secretary shall make a pro rata reduction for each day less than 365 in a fiscal year that the vessel is not operated in accordance with section 53205(a)(1), with days during which the vessel is drydocked or undergoing survey, inspection or repair to be considered days on which the vessel is operated as provided in subsection (b).

(Added Pub. L. 116–92, div. C, title XXXV, §3521(a), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1995; amended Pub. L. 117–263, div. C, title XXXV, §3517(b)(2), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3074.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 117–263 inserted "or section 51307(b)" after "this section".
#### Midtown Veal & Mutton Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Seymour Mensch, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Jacob Mensch, Deceased, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

In an action to recover the agreed price and reasonable value of goods sold and delivered, and for other relief, defendants, other than defendant Getzov, appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 3, 1960, granting plaintiff’s motion to preclude them from offering any proof to sustain the allegations of their affirmative defense that plaintiff, a New Jersey corporation, was not authorized to do business in this State. A bill of particulars was submitted by said defendants on the return day of the motion. The delay in serving the bill covered a period of approximately five months. Order reversed, without costs, and plaintiff’s motion to preclude denied. In our opinion, in view of all the facts and circumstances, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to grant plaintiff’s motion for an order of preclusion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q Quarterly Report ofEldorado Resorts LLC and Eldorado Capital Corp. (collectively, the “Company”)for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: November 13, 2003 | By:    | /s/ Robert M. Jones                      |
|--------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|                     |   | Robert M. Jones, Chief Financial Officer |
|                     |   | of Eldorado Resorts LLC                  |

 

 

----
### §44302a. Temporary insurance

(a) In General.—The Secretary may provide insurance or reinsurance under this section to or for an air carrier for 1 coverage period not to exceed 90 days. Except as otherwise provided in this section, such insurance or reinsurance shall be subject to the requirements of this chapter.

(b) Restrictions.—A policy for insurance or reinsurance issued under this section—

(1) may not be issued unless the insurance carrier of the air carrier has unilaterally terminated the air carrier's war risk liability coverage pursuant to—

(A) notice under the policy;

(B) an endorsement to the policy; or

(C) an automatic termination provision in the policy or any endorsement thereto; and

(2) may cover hull, comprehensive, and third party liability risks.

(c) Premium.—A premium for insurance or reinsurance provided under this section shall be calculated based on a prorated amount equivalent to the premium that was in effect under the terminated insurance carrier policy.

(d) Approval.—A policy for insurance or reinsurance provided under this section—

(1) shall be exempt from the requirements of section 44302(c); and

(2) may provide coverage to the extent allowed under section 44303, as determined by the Secretary, notwithstanding any determination by the President in subsection (a)(1) of such section.

(Added Pub. L. 117–328, div. Q, §103(a), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5252.)
#### Charles Severance et al., Appellants, v. Ralph J. Meade, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Broome County, entered upon jury verdicts of no cause of action in favor of respondent and from the order of the court denying appellants’ motion to set aside the verdicts and for a new trial. The appellant Esther Severance was operating an automobile owned by her husband, appellant Charles Severance, in a line of traffic on Route 17C. A car several cars ahead of her came to an abrupt stop causing the intervening vehicles to halt and she likewise slammed on her brakes making an abrupt stop a foot or so from the ear in front of her. The respondent who was following her at distance of 15 to 20 feet jammed on his brakes but struck the rear of the 'Severance ear. Both drivers testified that they were driving at about 10 to 15 miles per hour. Mrs. Severance sustained a whiplash injury to her back as a result of the collision. The road was clear, dry and straight at the place where the collision occurred. Mrs. Severance testified that her taillight that was not smashed in the accident was working afterwards. The respondent testified that he observed no signal on the part of Mrs. Severance indicating her intention to stop. The jury returned a verdict for the appellant Charles Severance for the property damage to his ear but returned verdicts of no cause of action on appellants’ suits for injuries, medical expenses and loss of services. The jury thus found that both Mrs. Severance and the respondent were negligent and the question on this appeal is whether there was any basis for that finding as to Mrs. Severance. It is undisputed that Mrs. Severance stopped quickly and without hand signal. We do not find, however, any evidence in the record to show how closely she was following the vehicle immediately preceding her, but she was able to bring her car to a stop about a foot from that vehicle without colliding with it. The negligence of the defendant is clear, but on this record in our view a finding of a jury that Mrs. Severance was negligent is against the weight of the evidence. In *Parrott*v. *Joseph*(9 A D 2d 991) relied on by respondent, Mrs. Joseph was operating her vehicle at a speed of at least 50 miles per hour, and was traveling closely behind the ear preceding her. Upon the particular factual situation therein, the verdict of the jury finding her negligent was reinstated by this court. Judgment reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to appellants.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsUser's Manual for FOMOCO Utilities-Force and Moment Computation Tools for Overset GridsIn the numerical computations of flows around complex configurations, accurate calculations of force and moment coefficients for aerodynamic surfaces are required. When overset grid methods are used, the surfaces on which force and moment coefficients are sought typically consist of a collection of overlapping surface grids. Direct integration of flow quantities on the overlapping grids would result in the overlapped regions being counted more than once. The FOMOCO Utilities is a software package for computing flow coefficients (force, moment, and mass flow rate) on a collection of overset surfaces with accurate accounting of the overlapped zones. FOMOCO Utilities can be used in stand-alone mode or in conjunction with the Chimera overset grid compressible Navier-Stokes flow solver OVERFLOW. The software package consists of two modules corresponding to a two-step procedure: (1) hybrid surface grid generation (MIXSUR module), and (2) flow quantities integration (OVERINT module). Instructions on how to use this software package are described in this user's manual. Equations used in the flow coefficients calculation are given in Appendix A.Document ID19960047499Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsChan, William M.*(MCAT Inst. San Jose, CA United States)*Buning, Pieter G.*(NASA Moffett Field, CA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1996Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberA-962064NASA-TM-110408NAS 1.15:110408Accession Number96N33165Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-59-53Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19960047499.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0578 CITY OF WHITEFISH,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ALEXANDRU CURRY,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 27, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 20 2022

05/20/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0578
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLOFT Debriefings: An Analysis of Instructor Techniques and Crew ParticipationThis study analyzes techniques instructors use to facilitate crew analysis and evaluation of their Line-Oriented Flight Training (LOFT) performance. A rating instrument called the Debriefing Assessment Battery (DAB) was developed which enables raters to reliably assess instructor facilitation techniques and characterize crew participation. Thirty-six debriefing sessions conducted at five U.S. airlines were analyzed to determine the nature of instructor facilitation and crew participation. Ratings obtained using the DAB corresponded closely with descriptive measures of instructor and crew performance. The data provide empirical evidence that facilitation can be an effective tool for increasing the depth of crew participation and self-analysis of CRM performance. Instructor facilitation skill varied dramatically, suggesting a need for more concrete hands-on training in facilitation techniques. Crews were responsive but fell short of actively leading their own debriefings. Ways to improve debriefing effectiveness are suggested.Document ID19970014649Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsDismukes, R. Key*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)*Jobe, Kimberly K.*(San Jose State Univ. Moffett Field, CA United States)*McDonnell, Lori K.*(San Jose State Univ. Moffett Field, CA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1997Subject CategoryAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-110442NAS 1.15:110442DOT/FAA/AR-96/122Accession Number97N17990Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-64-13-48-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970014649.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §§542 to 546. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 542 to 546, relating to Territory of Hawaii, were omitted in view of admission of Hawaii into the Union.

Section 542, acts Apr. 30, 1900, ch. 339, §77, 31 Stat. 156; Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 862, §1, 70 Stat. 920, created posts of auditor and deputy auditor and prescribed their powers and duties.

Section 542a, act Apr. 30, 1900, ch. 339, §77A, as added Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 862, §2, 70 Stat. 920, created position of post auditor and set out his duties, term, and powers.

Section 543, act Apr. 30, 1900, ch. 339, §78, 31 Stat. 156, prescribed powers and duties of surveyor.

Section 544, act Apr. 30, 1900, ch. 339, §79, 31 Stat. 156, prescribed powers and duties of high sheriff and deputies.

Section 545, act Apr. 30, 1900, ch. 339, §106, as added July 9, 1921, ch. 42, §315, 42 Stat. 121, and amended Aug. 14, 1958, Pub. L. 85–650, §1, 72 Stat. 606, prescribed powers and duties of board of harbor commissioners and called for board supervision of moneys appropriated for harbor improvements.

Section 546, acts Apr. 30, 1900, ch. 339, §80, 31 Stat. 156; Mar. 3, 1905, ch. 1465, §2, 33 Stat. 1035; July 9, 1921, ch. 42, §312, 42 Stat. 119; Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 862, §1, 70 Stat. 920; Aug. 28, 1958, Pub. L. 85–793, §§1, 2, 72 Stat. 957, dealt with nomination and appointment of officers by governor and provided for their terms and salaries.
# 881200 2010-1047

- 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 0 1 2 3 4 5HeatFlow(W/g)

20 60 100 140 1 80 220 260 3 00 3 40 380 420 

### T em p era tur e ( ° C ) Samp le : 2 0 10

- 1 047 881 2 00 S i ze : 1

. 00 0 0 mg M e t h od : 25

- 4 20 C G l 10 C / m i n N 2 

## D SC File : 201 0 1047

. 001 O p e r ator : M

. Spa c h er Run Da te : 26

- Jul

- 20 1 0 10 : 31



## Total Energy (J/g) Rate (W/g) d T /dt (C/ m in) R*E Slope of Maxi m

u m P eak (W/g/C) Width at Half Height (C) DSC Cell 850 Endo Extrapolated Onset T e m

p (C) Exo Onset T e m

p (C) Exo Extrapolated Onset T e m

p (C) Te m p at M axi m um Pea k (T m hr, C) Residue Description clear Cell Base 2920

V alidated B y: 

## SCHERVIN Date V alidated: 

## 08/13/2010
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.821 Emergency action and safety system shutdown—dry trees. ( a ) If your facility is impacted or will potentially be impacted by an emergency situation (e.g., an impending National Weather Service-named tropical storm or hurricane, ice events, or post-earthquake), you must: ( 1 ) Properly install a subsurface safety device on any well that is not yet equipped with a subsurface safety device and that is capable of natural flow, as soon as possible, with due consideration being given to personnel safety.
( 2 ) You must shut-in (by closing the SSV and the surface-controlled SSSV) the following types of wells: ( i ) All oil wells, and
( ii ) All gas wells requiring compression.
( b ) Closure of the SSV must not exceed 45 seconds after automatic detection of an abnormal condition or actuation of an ESD. The surface-controlled SSSV must close within 2 minutes after the shut-in signal has closed the SSV. The District Manager must approve any alternative design-delayed closure time of greater than 2 minutes based on the mechanical/production characteristics of the individual well.
[81 FR 60918, Sept. 7, 2016, as amended at 83 FR 49257, Sept. 28, 2018]
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.110 What must I include in my welding plan? You must include all of the following in the welding plan that you prepare under § 250.109: ( a ) Standards or requirements for welders;
( b ) How you will ensure that only qualified personnel weld;
( c ) Practices and procedures for safe welding that address: ( 1 ) Welding in designated safe areas;
( 2 ) Welding in undesignated areas, including wellbay;
( 3 ) Fire watches;
( 4 ) Maintenance of welding equipment; and
( 5 ) Plans showing all designated safe-welding areas.
( d ) How you will prevent spark-producing activities (*i.e.,* grinding, abrasive blasting/cutting and arc-welding) in hazardous locations.
**Exhibit31.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

I, James W. Dolan, certifythat:

 

1. I have reviewed this annualreport on Form 10-K of MAI Systems Corporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, thisannual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this annualreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this annual report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)              designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;

 

b)             evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as ofa date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the“Evaluation Date”); and

 

c)              presentedin this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)              allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)             anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or notthere were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors thatcould significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our mostrecent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 
|   | Date: March  24, 2004                 | By: | /s/   James W. Dolan |
|--------|---------------------------------------|-----|-------------------------------------|
|   | James W. Dolan                        |
|   | Chief Financial and Operating Officer |

 

----
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 

RECONNAISSANCE GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE 

BOYD GLACIER QUADRANGLE, MARIE BYRD 

LAND, ANTARCTICA 

By F. Alton Wade, Carl A. Cathey, and 

Jerry B. Oldham 

Prepared by the 

ANTARCTIC RESEARCH CENTER, THE MUSEUM 

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY 

under the auspices of the 

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 

U.S. ANTARCTIC RESEARCH PROGRAM MAP 

Published by the U.S. Geological Survey, 1977 

G 
GEOLOGIC MAP SYMBOLS 

COMMONLY USED ON MAPS OF THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 

(Special symbols are shown in' explanation) 

------------

------------

20 

........__-+_------

..... 1-----+--- -----

-E-+60 

Contact - Dashed where approximately 

located; short dashed where inferred; 

dotted where concealed 

Contact- Showing dip; well exposed at 

triangle 

Fault - Dashed where approximately 

located; short dashed where inferred; 

dotted where concealed. 

Fault, showing dip - Ball and bar on 

downthrown side 

Normal fault - Hachured on downthrown 

side 

Fault - Showing relative horizontal 

movement 

Thrust fault - Sawteeth on upper plate· 

Anticline- Showing direction of plunge; 

dashed where approximately located; 

dotted where concealed 

Asymmetric anticline - Short arrow 

indicates steeper limb 

Overturned anticline - Showing direction 

of dip of limbs 

Syncline - Showing directio·n of plunge; 

dashed where approximately located; 

dotted where concealed 

Asymmetric syncline - Short arrow 

indicates steeper limb 

Overturned syncline - Showing direction 

of dip of limbs 

Monocline - Showing direction of plunge 

of axis 

Minor anticline - Showing plunge of axis 

Minor syncline - Showing plunge of axis 

Strike and dip of beds - Ball indicates 

top of beds known from sedimentary structures 

~ Inclined EB Horizontal 

-+- Vertical ~ Overturned 

Strike and dip of foliation 

~ Inclined -+-- Vertical + Horizontal 

Strike and dip of cleavage 

~ Inclined ....,___. Vertical + Horizontal 

Bearing and plunge of lineation 

IS+- Inclined • Vertical - Horizontal 

Strike and dip of joints 

-!O Inclined - Vertical + Horizontal 

Note: planar symbols (strike and dip of beds, 

foliation or schistosity, and cleavage) may be 

combined with linear symbols to record data 

observed at same locality hy superimposed 

symbols at point of observation. Coexisting 

planar symbols are shown intersecting at point 

of observation. 

Shafts 

~ Vertical ~ Inclined 

Adit, tunnel, or slope 

>- Accessible >+- Inaccessible 

x Prospect 

Quarry 

~ Active 

Gravel pit 

X Active 

Oil well 

0 Drilling 

~ Gas 

• Oil 

~ Abandoned 

X Abandoned 

9 Shut-in -<?-

4 Show of gas 

~ Show of oil 

Dry hole 

abandoned
#### § 904.117 Responsibilities of homebuyer after acquisition of ownership.

After acquisition of ownership, each homeowner shall be required to pay to the LHA or to the homeowners association, as appropriate, a monthly fee for (a) the maintenance and operation of community facilities including utility facilities, if any, (b) the maintenance of grounds and other common areas and, (c) such other purposes as determined by the LHA or the homeowners association, as appropriate, including taxes and a provision for a reserve. This requirement shall be set out in the planned unit development or condominium documents which shall be recorded prior to the date of full availability, or in an LHA-homeowner contract in this regard.
### §518a. Repealed. July 25, 1947, ch. 327, §1, 61 Stat. 449

Section, act Jan. 2, 1942, ch. 646, 55 Stat. 881, related to employment of nationals of the United States on public works in Hawaii during the national emergency.