Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 230 / Monday, November 30, 2020 / Notices 76517 

1 See Welded Line Pipe from the Republic of 

Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2017–2018, 85 FR 7268 

(February 7, 2020) (Preliminary Results). 

2 See Husteel’s Letter, ‘‘Welded Line Pipe from 

South Korea, Case No. A–580–876; Husteel Case 

Brief,’’ dated March 11, 2020; see also Hyundai 

Steel’s Letter, ‘‘Welded Line Pipe from the Republic 

of Korea: Case Brief,’’ dated March 11, 2020; 

NEXTEEL’s Letter, ‘‘Welded Line Pipe from the 

Republic of Korea: NEXTEEL’s Case Brief,’’ dated 

March 11, 2020; SeAH’s Letter, ‘‘Case Brief of SeAH 

Steel Corporation,’’ dated March 11, 2020; Domestic 

Producers’ Letter, ‘‘Welded Line Pipe from the 

Republic of Korea: Case Brief of California Steel 

Industries (CSI), Welspun Tubular LLC USA, Stupp 

Corporation, A Division Of Stupp Bros., Inc, and 

American Cast Iron Pipe Company, ’’ dated March 

11, 2020; and Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, 

‘‘Welded Line Pipe from the Republic of Korea: 

Case Brief of the Domestic Interested Parties,’’ dated 

March 11, 2020. 

3 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘Welded 

Line Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Rebuttal Brief 

of the Domestic Interested Parties,’’ dated March 18, 

2020; see also Domestic Producers Letter, ‘‘Welded 

Line Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Rebuttal Brief 

Of California Steel Industries, Welspun Tubular 

LLC USA, Stupp Corporation, A Division Of Stupp 

Bros., Inc., and American Cast Iron Pipe Company,’’ 

dated March 18, 2020; Husteel’s Letter, ‘‘Welded 

Line Pipe from South Korea, Case No. A–580–876; 

Husteel Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated March 18, 2020; 

Hyundai Steel’s Letter, ‘‘Welded Line Pipe from the 

Republic of Korea: Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated March 18, 

2020; NEXTEEL’s Letter, ‘‘Welded Line Pipe from 

the Republic of Korea: NEXTEEL’s Rebuttal Brief,’’ 

dated March 18, 2020; and SeAH’s Letter, ‘‘Rebuttal 

Brief of SeAH Steel Corporation,’’ dated March 18, 

2020. 

4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews in Response to Operational 

Adjustments Due to COVID–19,’’ dated April 24, 

2020. 

5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews,’’ dated July 21, 2020. 

6 For a complete description of the scope of the 

order, see Preliminary Results, and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 

7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2017– 

2018 Administrative Review of the Antidumping 

Duty Order on Welded Line Pipe from Korea’’, 

dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, 

this notice (IDM). 

incurred charges. Callers will incur no 

charge for calls they initiate over landline connections to the toll-free 

telephone number. 

Individuals who are deaf, deafblind 

and hard of hearing may also follow the 

proceedings by first calling the Federal 

Relay Service at 1–800–877–8339 and 

providing the Federal Relay Service 

operator with the conference call-in 

numbers: 1–800–367–2403; Conference 

ID: 1644409. 

Members of the public are also 

entitled to submit written comments; 

the comments must be received in the 

regional office within 30 days following 

the meeting. Written comments may be 

emailed to Barbara Delaviez at ero@

usccr.gov. Persons who desire 

additional information may contact the 

Barbara Delaviez at 202–539–8246. 

Records of the meeting will be 

available via www.facadatabase.gov 

under the Commission on Civil Rights, 

Maine Advisory Committee link. 

Persons interested in the work of this 

Committee are directed to the 

Commission’s website, http://

www.usccr.gov, or may contact the 

Eastern Regional Office at the above 

email or phone number. 

Agenda 

Friday, December 11, 2020 at 2:30 p.m. 

(ET); and Thursday, December 17, 2020 

and Thursday, January 21, 2021, at 

12:00 p.m. 

• Welcome/Opening 

• Briefing on Digital Equity: 

Community Forum Open Session 

• Next Steps 

• Other Business 

• Public Comment 

• Adjournment 

Dated: November 24, 2020. 

David Mussatt, 

Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit. 

[FR Doc. 2020–26297 Filed 11–27–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–876] 

Welded Line Pipe From the Republic of 

Korea: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2017– 

2018 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) finds that producers or 

exporters of welded line pipe from the 

Republic of Korea sold welded line pipe 

at less than normal value during the 

period of review (POR), December 1, 

2017, through November 30, 2018. 

DATES: Applicable November 30, 2020. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David Goldberger or Joshua Tucker, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC, 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–4136 or (202) 482–0244, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

This review covers 32 producers or 

exporters. Commerce selected two 

companies, NEXTEEL Co., Ltd. 

(NEXTEEL) and SeAH Steel Corporation 

(SeAH), for individual examination. The 

producers or exporters not selected for 

individual examination are listed in the 

‘‘Final Results of the Review’’ section of 

this notice. 

On February 7, 2020, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results.1 On 

March 11, 2020, we received case briefs 

from Husteel Co. Ltd.; Hyundai Steel 

Company; NEXTEEL; SeAH, domestic 

producers California Steel Industries, 

Welspun Tubular LLC USA, Stupp 

Corporation, a Division Of Stupp Bros., 

Inc., and American Cast Iron Pipe 

Company, (collectively, ‘‘Domestic 

Producers’’); and Domestic Producers 

along with Maverick Tube Corporation, 

and TMK IPSCO (collectively, 

‘‘Domestic Interested Parties’’).2 On 

March 18, 2020, we received rebuttal 

briefs from Domestic Interested Parties, 

Domestic Producers, Husteel, Hyundai 

Steel, NEXTEEL, and SeAH.3

On April 24, 2020, Commerce tolled 

all deadlines in administrative reviews 

by 50 days.4 On July 21, 2020, 

Commerce tolled all deadlines for 

preliminary and final results in 

administrative reviews by an additional 

60 days.5 Therefore, the deadline for the 

final results of this review is November 

23, 2020. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is welded line pipe.6 The product is 

currently classified under the following 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) item numbers: 

7305.11.1030, 7305.11.1060, 

7305.11.5000, 7305.12.1030, 

7305.12.1060, 7305.12.5000, 

7305.19.1030, 7305.19.5000, 

7306.19.1010, 7306.19.1050, 

7306.19.5110, and 7306.19.5150. 

Although the HTSUS numbers are 

provided for convenience and for 

customs purposes, the written product 

description remains dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs are listed in Appendix I 

to this notice and addressed in the 

IDM.7 Interested parties can find a 

complete discussion of these issues and 

the corresponding recommendations in 

this public memorandum, which is on 

file electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the IDM can be 

accessed directly at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 

The signed IDM and the electronic 


TKELLEY on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES
76518 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 230 / Monday, November 30, 2020 / Notices 

8 See IDM at 3. 

9 See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

10 See Welded Line Pipe from the Republic of 

Korea and the Republic of Turkey: Antidumping 

Duty Orders, 80 FR 75056, 75057 (December 1, 

2015). 

version of the IDM are identical in 

content. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties regarding our Preliminary 

Results, we made certain changes to the 

preliminary weighted-average margins 

for NEXTEEL and SeAH.8

Final Results of the Review 

We are assigning the following 

weighted-average dumping margins to 

the firms listed below for the period 

December 1, 2017 through November 

30, 2018: 

Producer or exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

NEXTEEL Co., Ltd ..................... 15.07 

SeAH Steel Corporation ............. 9.33 

Review-Specific Average Rate for 

Companies Not Selected for Individual 

Review 

The dumping margins for the 

exporters or products not selected for 

individual review are listed in 

Appendix II. 

Disclosure of Calculations 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed within five days of the date 

of publication of this notice to parties in 

this proceeding, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (Act), 

and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce 

has determined, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise in 

accordance with the final results of this 

review. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

NEXTEEL reported the entered value of 

its U.S. sales such that we calculated 

importer-specific ad valorem duty 

assessment rates based on the ratio of 

the total amount of dumping calculated 

for the examined sales to the total 

entered value of the sales for which 

entered value was reported. SeAH did 

not report actual entered value for all of 

its U.S. sales; in such instances, we 

calculated importer-specific per-unit 

duty assessment rates by aggregating the 

total amount of antidumping duties 

calculated for the examined sales and 

dividing this amount by the total 

quantity of those sales. Where either the 

respondent’s weighted-average dumping 

margin is zero or de minimis within the 

meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an 

importer-specific assessment rate is zero 

or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

For the companies which were not 

selected for individual review, we will 

assign an assessment rate equal to each 

company’s weighted-average dumping 

margin identified above. The final 

results of this review shall be the basis 

for the assessment of antidumping 

duties on entries of merchandise 

covered by the final results of this 

review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable.9

We intend to issue liquidation 

instructions to CBP 15 days after 

publication of the final results of this 

review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for each specific 

company listed above will be equal to 

the weighted-average dumping margin 

that is established in the final results of 

this review, except if the rate is less 

than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de 

minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash 

deposit rate will be zero; (2) for 

previously investigated companies not 

listed above, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding in 

which the company participated; (3) if 

the exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, or the original less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation, but the 

manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be the cash deposit rate established 

for the most recently completed segment 

for the producer of the subject 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other producers or exporters 

will continue to be 4.38 percent, the allothers rate established in the LTFV 

investigation.10 These deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Secretary’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: November 20, 2020. 

Jeffrey I. Kessler, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the IDM 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Margin Calculations 

IV. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Lawfulness of Commerce’s 

Interpretation of the Particular Market 

Situation (PMS) Provision 

Comment 2: Evidence of a PMS 

Comment 3: PMS Adjustment 

Comment 4: Differential Pricing 

Comment 5: Non-Prime Costs for NEXTEEL 

Comment 6: Suspended Production Loss 

for NEXTEEL 

Comment 7: Capping of Freight Revenue 

for SeAH 

Comment 8: General and Administrative 

Expense Adjustment for SeAH’s U.S. 

Affiliates 

Comment 9: SeAH’s Constructed Export 

Price Offset Claim 

V. Recommendation 


TKELLEY on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 230 / Monday, November 30, 2020 / Notices 76519 

11 This rate is based on the weighted-average of 

the margins calculated for those companies selected 

for individual review using the publicly-ranged 

U.S. quantities. Because we cannot apply our 

normal methodology of calculating a weightedaverage margin due to requests to protect business 

proprietary information, we find this rate to be the 

best proxy of the actual weighted-average margin 

determined for the mandatory respondents. See Ball 

Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, Germany, 

Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, Final 

Results of Changed-Circumstances Review, and 

Revocation of an Order in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53663 

(September 1, 2010); see also Memorandum, 

‘‘Calculation of the Review-Specific Average Rate 

for the Final Results,’’ dated concurrently with this 

notice. 

1See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from 

Canada: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Rescission of Review, in 

Part; 2017–2018, 85 FR 7282 (February 7, 2020) 

(Preliminary Results) and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 

2We continue to treat Canfor Corporation; 

Canadian Forest Products Ltd.; and Canfor Wood 

Products Marketing Ltd. (collectively, Canfor) as a 

single entity. See Preliminary Results PDM at 5. 

3We continue to treat Resolute Growth Canada 

Inc.; Forest Products Mauricie LP; Socie ́te ́ en 

commandite Scierie Opitciwan; Resolute-LP 

Engineered Wood Larouche Inc.; Resolute-LP 

Engineered Wood St-Prime Limited Partnership; 

and Resolute FP Canada Inc. (collectively, Resolute) 

as a single entity. See Preliminary Results PDM at 

6. 

4We continue to treat West Fraser Mills Ltd.; Blue 

Ridge Lumber Inc.; Manning Forest Products Ltd.; 

and Sundre Forest Products Inc. (collectively, West 

Fraser) as a single entity. See Preliminary Results 

PDM at 6–7. 

5See IDM. 

6See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from 

Canada: Antidumping Duty Order and Partial 

Amended Final Determination, 83 FR 350 (January 

3, 2018) (Softwood Lumber Order). 

7See IDM at Comment 4. 

Appendix II 

Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to 

Companies Not Selected for Individual 

Review: 11

Exporter or producer 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

AJU Besteel Co, Ltd ................... 11.60 

BDP International, Inc. ............... 11.60 

Daewoo International Corporation .......................................... 11.60 

Dongbu Incheon Steel Co .......... 11.60 

Dongbu Steel Co, Ltd ................. 11.60 

Dongkuk Steel Mill ...................... 11.60 

Dong Yang Steel Pipe ................ 11.60 

EEW Korea Co, Ltd .................... 11.60 

HISTEEL Co, Ltd ........................ 11.60 

Husteel Co, Ltd ........................... 11.60 

Hyundai RB Co Ltd .................... 11.60 

Hyundai Steel Company/Hyundai 

HYSCO ................................... 11.60 

Kelly Pipe Co, LLC. .................... 11.60 

Keonwoo Metals Co, Ltd ............ 11.60 

Kolon Global Corp ...................... 11.60 

Korea Cast Iron Pipe Ind. Co, 

Ltd ........................................... 11.60 

Kurvers Piping Italy S.R.L .......... 11.60 

MSTEEL Co, Ltd ........................ 11.60 

Miju Steel MFG Co, Ltd .............. 11.60 

Poongsan Valinox (Valtimet Division) ........................................ 11.60 

POSCO ....................................... 11.60 

POSCO Daewoo ........................ 11.60 

R&R Trading Co Ltd ................... 11.60 

Sam Kang M&T Co, Ltd ............. 11.60 

Sin Sung Metal Co, Ltd .............. 11.60 

SK Networks ............................... 11.60 

Soon-Hong Trading Company .... 11.60 

Steel Flower Co, Ltd ................... 11.60 

TGS Pipe .................................... 11.60 

Tokyo Engineering Korea Ltd ..... 11.60 

[FR Doc. 2020–26336 Filed 11–27–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–122–857] 

Certain Softwood Lumber Products 

from Canada: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2017–2018 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that producers 

and/or exporters subject to this 

administrative review made sales of 

subject merchandise at less than normal 

value during the period of review (POR), 

June 30, 2017 through December 31, 

2018. 

DATES: Effective November 30, 2020. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff 

Pedersen (Canfor), Stephen Bailey 

(Resolute), Thomas Martin (West 

Fraser), or Maisha Cryor, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–2769, (202) 482–0193, (202) 

482–3936, or (202) 482–5831, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce published the Preliminary 

Results of this administrative review on 

February 7, 2020.1 This review covers 

253 producers/exporters of subject 

merchandise, including three 

mandatory respondents: Canfor,2

Resolute,3 and West Fraser.4 For events 

subsequent to the Preliminary Results, 

see Commerce’s Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.5 The final weightedaverage dumping margins are listed 

below in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ 

section of this notice. Commerce 

conducted this administrative review in 

accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by this review is 

softwood lumber from Canada. For a full 

description of the scope, see the IDM. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case briefs 

filed in this administrative review are 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum (IDM). A list of the topics 

discussed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is appended to this 

notice. The IDM is a public document 

and is available electronically via 

Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Services System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the IDM is also accessible at 

http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/ 

index.html. The signed IDM and the 

electronic versions of the IDM are 

identical in content. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties regarding our Preliminary 

Results, Commerce has made the 

following changes to the Preliminary 

Results: 

• As detailed in the February 28, 

2020 Memorandum, ‘‘Correction of 

Company names on the Record,’’ we 

revised certain names listed in the 

Preliminary Results. These revisions 

resulted in the number of stated 

producers/exporters under review 

changing from 257 to 253. 

• In the Preliminary Results, we 

incorrectly stated the all-others rate 

established in the LTFV investigation to 

be 6.58 percent. The correct all-others 

rate, as stated in the Softwood Lumber 

Order, is 6.04 percent.6

• We adjusted Canfor’s affiliated 

purchase prices of electricity and an 

input the identity of which is 

proprietary by the percentage the 

affiliated electricity purchases were 

below market prices.7

• We included Canfor’s inventory 

carrying costs incurred in the United 

States that were reported in U.S. dollars 


TKELLEY on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES