alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1468. Working capital fund; availability for uniforms or allowances therefor

The working capital fund, established by section 1467 of this title, shall on and after June 13, 1956 be available for uniforms or allowances therefor, as authorized by section 5901 of title 5.

(June 13, 1956, ch. 380, title I, §101, 70 Stat. 266.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 503 of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.
§ 1227.105 What are the hearing procedures? After ONRR notifies you that your delegation proposal is complete, ONRR will schedule a hearing on your proposal, if ONRR determines a hearing is appropriate, as follows: ( a ) The ONRR Director will appoint a hearing official to conduct one or more public hearings for fact finding regarding your ability to assume the delegated functions requested. The hearing official will not decide whether to approve your delegation request;
( b ) The hearing official will contact you about scheduling a hearing date and location;
( c ) The ONRR will publish notice of the hearing in the Federal Register and other appropriate media within your State;
( d ) ONRR will publish notice of the proposal in the Federal Register. ONRR will also post the proposal on the ONRR Website, and upon request, ONRR will send a copy of the delegation proposal to the trade associations to distribute to their members, as necessary;
( e ) At the hearing, you will have an opportunity to present testimony and written information in support of your proposal;
( f ) Other persons may attend the hearing and may present testimony and written information for the record;
( g ) ONRR will record the hearing;
( h ) ONRR will maintain a record of all documents related to the proposal process;
( i ) After the hearing, ONRR may require you to submit additional information in support of your delegation proposal.
[62 FR 43084, Aug. 12, 1997, as amended at 75 FR 61087, Oct. 4, 2010]
### §§1337a to 1337c. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 1337a to 1337c were omitted as not of general application, and as covered by the Canal Zone Code. The Canal Zone Code was subsequently redesignated the Panama Canal Code by Pub. L. 96–70, §3303(b), and repealed by Pub. L. 104–201, §3549.

Section 1337a, act June 19, 1934, ch. 667, §16, as added Aug. 12, 1949, ch. 422, §1, 63 Stat. 600, and amended Sept. 26, 1950, ch. 1049, §2(b), 64 Stat. 1038, related to acquisition or construction of structures, equipment, and improvements.

Section 1337b, act June 19, 1934, ch. 667, §17, as added Aug. 12, 1949, ch. 422, §1, 63 Stat. 600, and amended Sept. 26, 1950, ch. 1049, §2(b), 64 Stat. 1038, related to claims for losses of or damage to property.

Section 1337c, act June 19, 1934, ch. 667, §18, as added Aug. 12, 1949, ch. 422, §1, 63 Stat. 600, and amended Sept. 26, 1950, ch. 1049, §2(b), 64 Stat. 1038, related to disaster relief.
§ 1210.53 When are my royalty reports and payments due? ( a ) Completed Forms ONRR-2014 for royalty payments and the associated payments are due by the end of the month following the production month (see also § 1218.50 of this chapter).
( b ) Completed Forms ONRR-2014 for rental payments, where applicable, and the associated payments are due as specified by the lease terms (see also § 1218.50 of this chapter).
( c ) You may submit reports and payments early.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9371 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9371

  To take certain lands in the State of Washington into trust for the 
     benefit of the Quinault Indian Nation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 16, 2024

  Mr. Kilmer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To take certain lands in the State of Washington into trust for the 
     benefit of the Quinault Indian Nation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Quinault Indian Nation Land Transfer 
Act''.

SEC. 2. LANDS TO BE TRANSFERRED.

    (a) In General.--Subject to valid existing rights, the 
approximately 72 acres located in the State of Washington and generally 
depicted as ``Allotment 1157'' on the map entitled ``Quinault Indian 
Nation Land Transfer Act'' and dated February 02, 2024, shall be 
administratively transferred from the United States Forest Service, 
Department of Agriculture, to the United States Department of the 
Interior for the land which shall be taken into trust for the benefit 
of the Quinault Indian Nation.
    (b) Lands Part of Reservation; Administration.--The land taken into 
trust by subsection (a) is--
            (1) hereby declared to be part of the Quinault Indian 
        Reservation; and
            (2) shall be administered by the Secretary of the Interior 
        in accordance with the laws and regulations generally 
        applicable to property held in trust by the United States for 
        an Indian Tribe.
    (c) Gaming Prohibited.--The land taken into trust under subsection 
(a) shall not be eligible for gaming under the Indian Gaming Regulatory 
Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.).
    (d) No Impact on Treaty Rights.--Nothing in this Act shall be 
interpreted as affecting treaty rights under the Treaty of Olympia.
    (e) Hazardous Materials.--For purposes of the conveyance under 
subsection (a), the Secretary--
            (1) shall meet disclosure requirements for hazardous 
        substances, pollutants, or contaminants under section 120(h) of 
        the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 
        Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9620(h)); and
            (2) shall not otherwise be required to remediate or abate 
        those hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants.
                                 <all>
```
§ 983.11 Prohibition of excess public assistance. ( a ) *PBV assistance for newly constructed and rehabilitated housing.* The PHA may provide PBV assistance for newly constructed and rehabilitated housing only in accordance with HUD subsidy layering regulations (24 CFR 4.13) and other requirements.
( b ) *PBV assistance for existing housing.* The subsidy layering requirements are not applicable to existing housing.
( c ) *Development activity before HAP contract.* For the subsidy layering requirements related to development activity to place newly constructed or rehabilitated housing under a HAP contract, see § 983.153(b).
( d ) *Additional assistance after HAP contract.* ( 1 ) For newly constructed or rehabilitated housing under a HAP contract, the owner must disclose to the PHA, in accordance with HUD requirements, information regarding any additional related assistance from the Federal Government, a State, or a unit of general local government, or any agency or instrumentality thereof. Such related assistance includes but is not limited to any loan, grant, guarantee, insurance, payment, rebate, subsidy, credit, tax benefit, or any other form of direct or indirect assistance.
( 2 ) If the additional related assistance in paragraph (d)(1) of this section meets certain threshold and other requirements established by HUD through publication in the Federal Register, a subsidy layering review may be required to determine if it would result in excess public assistance to the project.
( 3 ) Housing assistance payments must not be more than is necessary, as determined in accordance with HUD requirements, to provide affordable housing after taking account of such related assistance. The PHA must adjust, in accordance with HUD requirements, the amount of the housing assistance payments to the owner to compensate in whole or in part for such related assistance.
[89 FR 38309, May 7, 2024]
V 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3357 

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain drawback claims 

relating to petroleum products. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 19, 2005 

Mr. JEFFERSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain 

drawback claims relating to petroleum products. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DRAWBACK CLAIMS RELATING TO PETROLEUM 

4 PRODUCTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 514 of 

6 the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other pro7 vision of law, the Bureau of Customs and Border Protec8 tion shall, not later than 90 days after the date of the 

9 enactment of this Act, liquidate or reliquidate each draw-
2 

•HR 3357 IH 

1 back claim described in subsection (c) at the full amount 

2 in each such claim. 

3 (b) PAYMENT OF AMOUNTS DUE.—Any amounts 

4 owed by the United States pursuant to liquidations or re5 liquidations under subsection (a) shall be paid by the Bu6 reau of Customs and Border Protection within 90 days 

7 after such liquidation or reliquidation. 

8 (c) DRAWBACK CLAIMS.—The drawback claims re9 ferred to in subsection (a) are the following: 

Drawback Claim Number: Filing Date:

AA6/0247626–6 ..................................................... 10/26/95

AA6/0301055–1 ..................................................... 09/27/95

AA6/0303661–4 ..................................................... 01/22/98

AA6–0248050–8 ..................................................... 09/27/95

AA6–0248051–6 ..................................................... 09/27/95

AA6–0248052–4 ..................................................... 09/27/95

AA6–0248053–2 ..................................................... 09/27/95

AA6–0248054–0 ..................................................... 09/27/95

AA6–0248055–7 ..................................................... 09/27/95

AA6–0248056–5 ..................................................... 09/27/95

AA6–0248057–3 ..................................................... 09/27/95. 

Æ
EXHIBIT D TO FEDERAL PRO BONO PROJECT GUIDELINES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DONALD RODRIGUEZ, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

JAMES E. TILTON, et al., 

 Defendants 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL

Plaintiff Donald Rodriguez has requested and is in need of counsel to assist him in this 

matter, and a volunteer attorney is willing to be appointed to undertake this representation at the 

request of the Federal Pro Bono Project. 

Accordingly, David B. Goodwin and Matthew J. Hawkinson of Covington & Burling 

LLP are hereby appointed as counsel for plaintiff in this matter. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ________________________________ 

 United States District Judge 

Case 3:08-cv-05390-MMC Document 59 Filed 03/15/10 Page 1 of 1
#### John W. Sturtevant and C. Earle Patterson, appellants, v. St. Francis Hotel Company et al., appellees.

Gen. No. 27,965.

Bill to foreclose a trust deed conveying a leasehold. Cross-petition filed by occupant of premises asking for order that he be not disturbed. Decree entitling cross-petitioner to compensation and to lien on the premises against complainants. Appeal on the decree as it affects cross-petition only. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. G. Fred Rush, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1922. *664Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 25, 1923.

Rehearing denied July 6, 1923.

Frank T. Jordan, for appellants. Wiley W. Mills, for appellees; Francis L. Brinkman, of counsel.

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.
§ 36.20 Quality of material, workmanship, and design. ( a ) MSHA will test only equipment that in the opinion of its qualified representatives is constructed of suitable materials, is of good quality workmanship, based on sound engineering principles, and is safe for its intended use. Since all possible designs, arrangements, or combinations of components and materials cannot be foreseen, MSHA reserves the right to modify the construction and design requirements of subassemblies or components and tests thereof to obtain the same degree of protection as provided by the tests described in Subpart C of this part.
( b ) The quality of material, workmanship, and design shall conform to the requirements of § 7.98(q) of this chapter.
( c ) Power packages approved under part 7, subpart F of this chapter are considered to be acceptable for use in equipment submitted for approval under this part. Sections 36.21 through 36.26 (except § 36.25(f)) and §§ 36.43 through 36.48 are not applicable to equipment utilizing part 7, subpart F power packages, since these requirements have already been satisfied.
[Sched. 31, 26 FR 645, Jan. 24, 1961, as amended at 61 FR 55526, Oct. 25, 1996]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), each of the undersigned
officers of NCO Group, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify with respect to
the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2006 (the "Report") that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 10, 2006                      /s/ Michael J. Barrist
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Michael J. Barrist
                                        Chief Executive Officer


Date: May 10, 2006                      /s/ Steven L. Winokur
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Steven L. Winokur
                                        Chief Financial Officer

     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
---



##### 



ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS
    
    
    3ARTICLE 2. SECURITIES INVESTMENT AND CONSULTANCY INFORMATION
AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT
    
    
    3ARTICLE 3. TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICE FEE
    
    
    4ARTICLE 4. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
    
    
    4ARTICLE 5. CONFIDENTIALITY
    
    
    4ARTICLE 6. GOVERNING LAW AND EVENTS OF DEFAULT
    
    
    4ARTICLE 7. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
    
    
    5ARTICLE 8. EFFECTIVENESS
    
    
    5ARTICLE 9. NO SUBSEQUENT OBLIGATION
    
    
    5ARTICLE 10. TRANSFER LIMITATION
    
    
    5ARTICLE 11. AMENDMENT
    
    
    5ARTICLE 12. COUNTERPARTS
    
    
    5ARTICLE 13. MISCELLANEOUS
    
    
    6EXHIBIT 1 CONTENT OF THE TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES
    
    
    7EXHIBIT 2 TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICE FEE
    
    
    8




---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



#####
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Paul G. Anderson, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of FCStone Group, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):



a) all significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|    |  |                                                                       
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /S/    PAUL G.
ANDERSON                                               
|    |  | Paul G. Anderson Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)



Date:
November 29, 2005
#### HILGERT v. BLACK.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 17, 1905.)

Action by Mathew Hilgert against Archibald P. Black. No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs.
### §1323j. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–845, §26(b), Oct. 18, 1962, 76A Stat. 701

Section, act June 13, 1940, ch. 358, §2, 54 Stat. 389, related to deposit money orders.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.1


                    INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT AND CONSENT

The Board of Directors
MAI Systems Corporation:

The audits referred to in our report dated March 31, 2002, included the related
financial statement schedule as of December 31, 2001, and for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001, included in the annual report
on Form 10-K. The financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the
information set forth therein.

We consent to incorporation by reference of our report dated March 31, 2002, in
the Company's registration statements (Nos. 33-92194, 333-72412, 333-72414 and
333-72418) on Form S-8 and registration statement (No. 333-57454) on Form S-3.



/s/ KPMG LLP

Costa Mesa, California
April 12, 2002
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3222

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,6-Dichloro aniline. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 12, 2005

Mr. BUYER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,6-Dichloro 

aniline.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. 2,6-DICHLORO ANILINE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.29.17 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 2,6-Dichloro aniline) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2

•HR 3222 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IMPSAT Fiber Networks, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the
Report) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Héctor Alonso, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by
the Chief Financial Officer of the Company with the requirements of Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be disclosed, distributed or
used by any person or for any reason other than as specifically required by
law.

|                  |  |                                                       
|----------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|November 14, 2002 |  | /s/ HÉCTOR ALONSOHéctor Alonso
Chief Financial Officer