alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w7



 



EXHIBIT 10.7


AMENDMENT TO MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT


     This Amendment (the “Amendment”) is effective as of the 1st day of July,
2002 and amends that certain Management Agreement (the “Management Agreement”)
entered into as of the first day of June, 1996 by and between FLORIDA PANTHERS
HOLDINGS, INC., a Florida Corporation, and HUIZENGA HOLDINGS, INC., a Florida
Corporation (“HHI”).


     Whereas, on July 1, 1996 Florida Panthers Holdings, Inc. and HHI entered
into a Management Agreement; and


     Whereas, Boca Resorts, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), by
virtue of merger, is the successor in interest to Florida Panthers Holdings,
Inc., a Florida corporation; and


     Whereas, HHI and the Company desire to amend Section 2 of the Management
Agreement.


     Now Therefore, in consideration of the premises, the parties agree as
follows:



	 	 	 
	1.	 	
Amendment of Section 2. Section 2 of the Management
Agreement is deleted and replaced in its entirety to read as
follows:
	 
	2.	 	
MANAGEMENT FEE AND REIMBURSEMENT OF
COSTS. In return for services provided, the
Company shall pay HHI a Management Fee equal to 1%
of the Company’s annual gross revenue on a
quarterly basis of each fiscal year which ends on
June 30th in which this Agreement is in effect;
provided, however, that the Management Fee payable
for the year ended June 30, 2003 shall not exceed
$1.9 million. HHI shall be reimbursed for all
reasonable out-of-pocket costs, fees or expenses
incurred, or expenditures made, in connection with
the performance by HHI of its duties hereunder.
Except for the Management Fee and the
reimbursement of such costs, fees and expenses
pursuant to this Section 2, there shall be no fees
or other sums paid to HHI for the services
provided by HHI during the term hereunder.



     The Management Agreement between HHI and the Company (as successor in
interest to Florida Panthers Holdings, Inc.), as amended by this Amendment,
remains in full force and effect.


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment this
25th day of September 2002.



	 	 	 
	 	 	
Boca Resorts, Inc.
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 	 	
By: WILLIAM M. PIERCE
	 	 	


	 	 	
Name: WILLIAM M. PIERCE
	 	 	


	 	 	
Title: Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
	 	 	


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 	 	
Huizenga Holdings, Inc.
	 
	 
	 	 	
By: CRIS BRANDEN
	 	 	


	 	 	
Name: CRIS BRANDEN

Title: Vice President
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.740 What records must I keep? You must keep a daily report consisting of complete, legible, and accurate records for each well. You must keep records onsite while well operations continue. After completion of operations, you must keep all operation and other well records for the time periods shown in § 250.741 at a location of your choice, except as required in § 250.746. The records must contain complete information on all of the following: ( a ) Well operations, all testing conducted, and any real-time monitoring data as required by § 250.724;
( b ) Descriptions of formations penetrated;
( c ) Content and character of oil, gas, water, and other mineral deposits in each formation;
( d ) Kind, weight, size, grade, and setting depth of casing;
( e ) All well logs and surveys run in the wellbore;
( f ) Any significant malfunction or problem; and
( g ) All other information required by the District Manager as appropriate to ensure compliance with the requirements of this section and to enable BSEE to determine that the well operations are consistent with conservation of natural resources and protection of safety and the environment on the OCS.
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.810 Dry tree subsurface safety devices—general. For wells using dry trees or for which you intend to install dry trees, you must equip all tubing installations open to hydrocarbon-bearing zones with subsurface safety devices that will shut off the flow from the well in the event of an emergency unless, after you submit a request containing a justification, the District Manager determines the well to be incapable of natural flow. You must install flow couplings above and below the subsurface safety devices. These subsurface safety devices include the following devices and any associated safety valve lock and landing nipple: ( a ) An SSSV, including either: ( 1 ) A surface-controlled SSSV; or
( 2 ) A subsurface-controlled SSSV.
( b ) An injection valve.
( c ) A tubing plug.
( d ) A tubing/annular subsurface safety device.
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.826 Specifications for SSSVs—subsea trees.

All SSSVs, safety valve locks, and landing nipples installed on the OCS must conform to the requirements specified in §§ 250.801 through 250.803 and any Deepwater Operations Plan (DWOP) required by §§ 250.286 through 250.295.
Attachment B 

Receptors for Class I Areas 
Figure 1: Receptors for Arches National Park (ARCH) 
Figure 2: Receptors for Bandelier National Monument (BAND) 
Figure 3: Receptors for Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park (BLCA) 
Figure 4: Receptors for Canyonlands National Park (CANY) 
Figure 5: Receptors for Capitol Reef National Park (CARE) 
Figure 6: Receptors for Grand Canyon National Park (GRCA) 
Figure 7: Great Sand Dunes National Park (GRSA) 
Figure 8: Receptors for La Garita Wilderness (LAGA) 
Figure 9: Receptors for Maroon Bells-Snowmass Wilderness (MABE) 
Figure 10: Receptors for Mesa Verde National Park (MEVE) 
Figure 11: Receptors for Pecos Wilderness (PECO) 
Figure 12: Receptors for Petrified Forest National Park (PEFO) 
Figure 13: Receptors for San Pedro Parks Wilderness (SAPE) 
Figure 14: Receptors for West Elk Wilderness (WEEL) 
Figure 15: Receptors for Weminuche Wilderness (WEMI) 
Figure 16: Receptors for Wheeler Peak Wilderness (WHPE)
§ 203.89 What is in a cost report? This report lists all actual and projected costs for your field, must explain and document the source of each cost estimate, and must identify the following elements. ( a ) *Sunk costs.* Report sunk costs in dollars not adjusted for inflation and only if you have documentation.
( b ) *Appraisal, delineation and development costs.* Base them on actual spending, current authorization for expenditure, engineering estimates, or analogous projects. These costs cover: ( 1 ) Platform well drilling and average depth;
( 2 ) Platform well completion;
( 3 ) Subsea well drilling and average depth;
( 4 ) Subsea well completion;
( 5 ) Production system (platform); and
( 6 ) Flowline fabrication and installation.
( c ) *Production costs based on historical costs, engineering estimates, or analogous projects.* These costs cover: ( 1 ) Operation;
( 2 ) Equipment; and
( 3 ) Existing royalty overrides (we will not use the royalty overrides in evaluations).
( d ) *Transportation costs, based on historical costs, engineering estimates, or analogous projects.* These costs cover: ( 1 ) Oil or gas tariffs from pipeline or tankerage;
( 2 ) Trunkline and tieback lines; and
( 3 ) Gas plant processing for natural gas liquids.
( e ) *Abandonment costs, based on historical costs, engineering estimates, or analogous projects.* You should provide the costs to plug and abandon only wells and to remove only production systems for which you have not incurred costs as of the time of application submission. You should also include a point estimate or distribution of prospective salvage value for all potentially reusable facilities and materials, along with the source and an explanation of the figures provided.
( f ) *A set of cost estimates consistent with each one of up to three field-development scenarios and production profiles (conservative, most likely, optimistic).* You should express costs in constant real dollar terms for the base year. You may also express the uncertainty of each cost estimate with a minimum and maximum percentage of the base value.
( g ) *A spending schedule.* You should provide costs for each year (in real dollars) for each category in paragraphs (a) through (f) of this section.
( h ) *A summary of other costs which are ineligible for evaluating your need for relief.* These costs cover: ( 1 ) Expenses before first discovery on the field;
( 2 ) Cash bonuses;
( 3 ) Fees for royalty relief applications;
( 4 ) Lease rentals, royalties, and payments of net profit share and net revenue share;
( 5 ) Legal expenses;
( 6 ) Damages and losses;
( 7 ) Taxes;
( 8 ) Interest or finance charges, including those embedded in equipment leases;
( 9 ) Fines or penalties; and
( 10 ) Money spent on previously existing obligations (e.g., royalty overrides or other forms of payment for acquiring a financial position in a lease, expenditures for plugging wells and removing and abandoning facilities that existed on the application submission date).
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9387 

To authorize a court to award restitution for unlawful entry and presence 

in the United States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 20, 2024 

Mr. GAETZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To authorize a court to award restitution for unlawful entry 

and presence in the United States, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Allocating Liability 

5 to Illegal Entrants in National Courts Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘ALIEN Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. ORDER OF RESTITUTION FOR UNLAWFUL ENTRY 

8 AND PRESENCE IN THE UNITED STATES. 

9 Section 3663(a) of title 18, United States Code, is 

10 amended— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9387 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘or section 5124’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘section 5124’’; and 

3 (2) by inserting ‘‘or section 275(a) of the Immi4 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1325(a)),’’ 

5 before ‘‘other than an offense’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
P.1 

OAR Box 1787 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

90) ll-C-48 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 11/4/200810:22:20 AM Sheet 90 of 147 
P.2 

A-90-37 

ll-C-48 

ll-C-48 is not a missing 

document. ll-C-48 was 

accidently skipped in the 

numbering sequence 

of the index.
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.1923 [Reserved]
#### Shiela Nuta, Respondent, v. Philip Nuta, Appellant.

In an action by plaintiff wife for a judicial separation, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 2, 1963, as, upon the wife’s motion, awarded to her, *pendente*lite: (a) $100 a week for alimony and for the support of their infant child, commencing October 27, 1962, the date of service of the motion papers; and (b) $850 for a counsel fee. Order modified by reducing the alimony and support to $75 a week, and the counsel fee to $500. As so modified, order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. Under the circumstances disclosed by this record, it is our opinion that the allowances were excessive. However, our award, which is based on conflicting affidavits, is not intended to govern or influence the Trial Justice in exercising his discretion to fix the amount of permanent alimony, if any. The Trial Justice’s determination should rest exclusively upon the proof adduced at the trial. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
### PART C—PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Scott D. Josey, certify that:     (1) I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Mariner Energy, Inc.;     (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     (4) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have:     a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     (5) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):     a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 15, 2007                                                        /s/ Scott D. Josey   Scott D. Josey,   Chairman of the Board,Chief Executive Officer and President
§ 36.11 Approval plates. ( a ) A certificate of approval will be accompanied by a photograph of an approval plate, bearing the emblem of the Mine Safety and Health Administration and spaces for the approval number, the type, the serial number, and ventilation requirement; the name of the complete assembly; and the name of the applicant.
( b ) The applicant shall reproduce the design as a separate plate, which shall be attached, in a suitable place, on each complete assembly to which it relates. The size, type, and method of attaching and location of an approval plate are subject to MSHA's approval. The method of affixing the approval plate shall not impair the permissibility (explosion-proof) features of the complete assembly of mobile diesel-powered transportation equipment.
( c ) The approval plate identifies the equipment, to which it is attached, as permissible and is the applicant's guarantee that the equipment complies with the requirements of this part. Without an approval plate no equipment is considered permissible under the provisions of this part.
( d ) Use of the approval plate obligates the applicant to whom the certificate of approval was granted to maintain in his plant the quality of each complete assembly bearing it and guarantees that it is manufactured and assembled according to the drawings, specifications, and descriptions upon which a certificate of approval was based.
[Sched. 31, 26 FR 645, Jan. 24, 1961, as amended at 43 FR 12318, Mar. 24, 1978]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3246 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3246

      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on tebufenozide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 2005

  Mr. Buyer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on tebufenozide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEBUFENOZIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.05.17 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to tebufenozide) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### §309. Repealed. Feb. 10, 1939, ch. 2, §4(a), 53 Stat. 1

Section, act July 18, 1914, ch. 187, 38 Stat. 517, related to taxation of railroads.
### §§1321, 1322. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 1321 and 1322 were omitted as not of general application, and as covered by the Canal Zone Code. The Canal Zone Code was subsequently redesignated the Panama Canal Code by Pub. L. 96–70, §3303(b), and repealed by Pub. L. 104–201, §3549.

Section 1321, acts Aug. 21, 1916, ch. 371, §10, 39 Stat. 529; June 19, 1934, ch. 667, §1, 48 Stat. 1122, related to passage of persons through the Canal Zone.

Section 1322, acts Aug. 21, 1916, ch. 371, §10, 39 Stat. 529; June 19, 1934, ch. 667, §1, 48 Stat. 1122, related to injury to Canal and appurtenances.
- yTT• r k ACila ; till IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF 

## git
. TgN i3 PR 23-0232 

### SEP 1 9 2023 Bowen Cir

- -enwood Clerk of Sup orne L;curt State nf 0Jtontana IN RE MOTION FOR ADMISSION UPON UNIFORM BAR EXAMINATION SCORE TRANSFER ORDER Benjamin C. Thompson has filed a petition for admission to the State Bar of Montanapursuant toRule IV ofthe Rules for Admission tothe Bar ofthe State ofMontana, governing admission upon Uniform Bar Examination score transfer. The Bar Admissions Administrator ofthe State Bar ofMontana has informed the Court that the Commission on Character and Fitness has certified that Thompson has provided the necessary documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission under Rule IV ofthe Rules for Admission to the State Bar ofMontana. Thompson has also requested permission to be sworn in by Justice of the Peace Jeanne Walker ofthe Thirteenth Judicial District, Yellowstone County. Upon consideration ofthe petition, IT IS ORDERED that upon payment ofany application fees and competition ofany other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions Administrator, Benjamin C. Thompson may be sworn in to the practice oflaw in the State ofMontana. However, Rule X(D) of the Rules of Admission provides that in-jurisdiction swearing-in must be administered by "the Clerk ofthe Montana Supreme Court or by any districtjudge in the state ofMontana." (Emphasis added.) Therefore, ajustice ofthepeace is not authorized to administer the oath under the Rules. Therefore, Thompson's request to be sworn in to the practice of law by a Yellowstone County Justice of the Peace is DENIED. Other arrangements for swearing-in may be made by contacting the office of the Clerk ofthe Montana Supreme Court. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to the Petitioner and the State Bar ofMontana. 09/19/2023

Case Number: PR 23-0232DATED this day of Septernber, 2023.

ChiefJustice



# (J-3-age4-0/ AacM41:L.

Justices
#### Pacific Northern Fence Corporation, Respondent, v. Allied Fabricators, Inc., Appellant.

In an action upon certain promissory notes, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 13, 1963, which denied its motion to open its default in pleading and to vacate the judgment for $4,189.99 entered February 14, 1963 upon such default. The order was made on a decision by the Special Term, dated February 26, 1963, *granting*defendant’s motion “ on condition that the defendant file with the proposed order, a surety company bond in the penal sum of $4,500.” The decision provided further that “ In the event an order is not submitted to the court for signature in accordance with [said] decision within 15 days from the date [thereof], the motion to open the default is denied and an order may be submitted to [that] effect.” Defendant did not file the bond, and the above order denying the motion unconditionally was accordingly entered. Order reversed, without costs, and motion to open defendant’s default granted upon condition that the existing judgment shall remain on record as a lien and as security for any recovery which may be had by plaintiff in this action. Defendant’s time to serve its answer is extended until 20 days after entry of the order hereon. Where, as here, the record shows that the default was unintentional, it was improper, as a condition to opening the default, to require that the defendant post a surety company bond. In our opinion it is sufficient that the default judgment stand as security *(Schlein*v. *Schlein,*276 App. Div. 951; *Machina*v. *Pryzgoda,*282 App. Div. 1051). Beldoek, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Babin, JJ., concur.