alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§292, 293. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 292 and 293, relating to Territory of Alaska, were omitted in view of admission of Alaska into the Union.

Section 292, act Apr. 13, 1934, ch. 119, §2, 48 Stat. 583, provided for manufacture and sale of intoxicating liquors.

Section 293, act Apr. 13, 1934, ch. 119, §3, 48 Stat. 584, ratified and approved act to create board of liquor control, and prescribed penalties for violation of rules and regulations of the board.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 28, 2009 

0921 

Order 

 

September 28, 2009 

139191 

MICHAEL S. DORMAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 139191 

 COA: 284665 

Macomb CC: 06-003807-NM 

GILBERT A. ZOOK, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 21, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>





<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
PJ America's consolidated financial statements for the three months ended
June 25, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            MAR-27-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-25-2000
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                    4,271
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                       676
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                3,138
<PP&E>                                         42,422
<DEPRECIATION>                               (10,350)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 46,584
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           9,679
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           46
<OTHER-SE>                                     35,069
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   46,584
<SALES>                                        27,642
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               27,642
<CGS>                                           8,385
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  24,409
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1,573
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (20)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,680
<INCOME-TAX>                                      588
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,092
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,092
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.23


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with  the  accompanying Quarterly Report of Radale Imports,
Inc.,  (the  "Company")  on  Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003
(the "Report"), I, Lee D. Dodson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify  that  to  my  knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                                       /s/  Lee  D.  Dodson
Dated:  November  13,  2003            -----------------------------------------
                                       Lee  D.  Dodson
                                       Chief  Financial  Officer


     The  above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the  Form  10-Q  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.








                                                                    Exhibit 32.1
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
#### § 556.100 Statement of policy.

The management of Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) resources is to be conducted in accordance with the findings, purposes, and policy directions provided by the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act Amendments of 1978 (OCSLA or the Act) (43 U.S.C. 1332, 1801, 1802), and other executive, legislative, judicial and departmental guidance. The Secretary of the Interior (the Secretary) will consider available environmental information in making decisions affecting OCS resources.
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Deltic Timber Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ron L. Pearce, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





/s/    Ron L. Pearce





Ron L. Pearce


Chief Executive Officer


August
13, 2002
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-40357

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PHILLIP CURTIS PATTON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:94-CR-36-1

_________________________________________________________________

February 5, 1996

Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The appellant appeals from the district court's sentence for

use of an explosive to damage or destroy a building. He argues

that the district court should have adjusted his offense level

downward for acceptance of responsibility and that the court should

not have upwardly departed under the Sentencing Guidelines. We

have reviewed the record and the transcript of the sentencing

hearing in the district court and find no reversible error.
-2-

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the appellant's sentence for essentially the

reasons given by the district court. United States v. Patton, No.

6:94-CR-36-1 (E.D. Tex. June 8, 1995).

A F F I R M E D.
130 STAT. 1002 PUBLIC LAW 114–251—DEC. 8, 2016 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5785: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 114–765 (Comm. on Oversight and Government Reform). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

Sept. 20, considered and passed House. 

Nov. 29, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–251 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide for an annuity supplement for 

certain air traffic controllers. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. FULL ANNUITY SUPPLEMENT FOR CERTAIN AIR TRAFFIC 

CONTROLLERS. 

Section 8421a of title 5, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘The amount’’ and inserting 

‘‘Except as provided in subsection (c), the amount’’; 

(2) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and 

(3) by inserting after subsection (b) the following: 

‘‘(c) This section shall not apply to an individual described 

in section 8412(e) during any period in which the individual, after 

separating from the service as described in that section, is employed 

full-time as an air traffic control instructor under contract with 

the Federal Aviation Administration, including an instructor 

working at an on-site facility (such as an airport).’’. 

Approved December 8, 2016. 

Dec. 8, 2016 

[H.R. 5785] 


kgrant on DSKB33CYQ1 with PUBLAW
### §§1405u to 1405w. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–357, title III, §307, Oct. 19, 1982, 96 Stat. 1709

Section 1405u, act June 22, 1936, ch. 699, §22, 49 Stat. 1812, related to appointment of an Administrator for Saint Croix to act for Governor.

Section 1405v, act June 22, 1936, ch. 699, §23, 49 Stat. 1813, related to appointment of such other executive and administrative officers as may be required in discretion of Secretary of the Interior.

Section 1405w, act June 22, 1936, ch. 699, §24, 49 Stat. 1813, related to appointment of all salaried officers and employees of municipal governments by Governor with advice and consent of municipal council having jurisdiction.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Harpreet S. Sangha, the Chief Executive Officer of Douglas Lake Minerals Inc. (the "Company"), and Sylvia Tang, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company, for the year ended May 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  September 15, 2008

"Harpreet S. Sangha"

Harpreet S. Sangha
Chief Executive Officer



"Sylvia Tang"

Sylvia Tang 
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

__________
§ 56.14116 Hand-held power tools. ( a ) Power drills, disc sanders, grinders and circular and chain saws, when used in the hand-held mode shall be operated with controls which require constant hand or finger pressure.
( b ) Circular saws and chain saws shall not be equipped with devices which lock-on the operating controls.
Order entered August 19, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00123
- CV SAMUELS AND SONS, LLC , Appellant

V. CAROLINE WILLIAMSON, MARY TUCKER, AND JACOB SHAPE , A ppellee s On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 20
- 00796
- D

O RDER Before the Court are appellant’s motion to extend time to file brief and appellees’ response in opposition. We GRANT the motion and ORDE R the brief be filed no later than September 20, 2021.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
§ 552.6 Freedom of Information Act requirements. ( a ) The Director shall make data and information available in accordance with the requirements and subject to the limitations of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552), the regulations contained in 43 CFR part 2 (Records and Testimony), the requirements of the Act, and the regulations contained in 30 CFR parts 250 and 550 (Oil and Gas and Sulphur Operations in the Outer Continental Shelf) and 30 CFR part 551 (Geological and Geophysical Explorations of the Outer Continental Shelf).
( b ) Except as provided in § 552.7 or in 30 CFR parts 250, 251, 550, and 551 of this chapter, no data or information determined by the director to be exempt from public disclosure under paragraph (a) of this section shall be provided to any affected State or be made available to the executive of any affected local government or to the public unless the lessee, or the permittee and all persons to whom such permittee has sold such data or information under promise of confidentiality, agree to such action.
### §321. Definitions

In this subchapter, "aeronautics", "air commerce", and "air navigation facility" have the same meanings given those terms in section 40102(a) of this title.

(Pub. L. 97–449, §1(b), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2422; Pub. L. 98–216, §2(2), Feb. 14, 1984, 98 Stat. 5; Pub. L. 103–272, §5(m)(8), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1376; Pub. L. 103–429, §6(2), Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4378.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 321 | (no source). | |

Section

A number of the source provisions of the subchapter are taken from 49:ch. 20. The text of 49:ch. 20 contains general definitions, some of which are used in those source provisions. The section includes those definitions from 49:ch. 20 that are used in the source provisions included in the subchapter.

#### Pub. L. 103–429

This makes a clarifying amendment to 49:321.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–429 struck out ", respectively" after "of this title".

Pub. L. 103–272 substituted "section 40102(a) of this title" for "section 101(2), (4), and (8) of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 App. U.S.C. 1301(2), (4), (8))".

1984—Pub. L. 98–216 substituted "49 App. U.S.C." for "49 U.S.C.".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Pub. L. 103–429, §9, Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4391, provided that: "The amendments made by sections 6(2)–(15), (19)–(35), (37)–(39), (41), (44)–(52), (54)–(62), (65), (66)(B), (70), (73)–(76), and (78)–(81) of this Act [enacting section 41312 of this title and amending this section and sections 5103, 5104, 5115, 5125, 5307, 5318, 5320, 5323, 5326, 5327, 5331, 5337, 5565, 20136, 22108, 24501, 24904, 30141, 30165, 30166, 30308, 31501, 32101, 32304, 32309, 32505, 32703, 32705, 32706, 32908 to 32910, 32913, 33101, 33106, 40102, 40104, 40110, 41103, 41110, 41734, 44502, 44701, 44711, 44937, 45105, 45302, 46301, 46310, 46502, 47101, 47113, 47114, 47128, 47531, 47532, 60109, and 60112 of this title] shall take effect on July 5, 1994."
PUBLIC LAW 114–275—DEC. 14, 2016 130 STAT. 1405 

Public Law 114–275 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To require limitations on prescribed burns. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prescribed Burn Approval Act 

of 2016’’. 

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

In this Act: 

(1) NATIONAL FIRE DANGER RATING SYSTEM.—The term 

‘‘national fire danger rating system’’ means the national system 

used to provide a measure of fire danger according to a range 

of low to moderate to high to very high to extreme. 

(2) PRESCRIBED BURN.—The term ‘‘prescribed burn’’ means 

a planned fire intentionally ignited. 

(3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary 

of Agriculture, acting through the Chief of the Forest Service. 

SEC. 3. LIMITATIONS ON PRESCRIBED BURNS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection (b), the 

Secretary shall not authorize a prescribed burn on Forest Service 

land if, for the county or contiguous county in which the land 

is located, the national fire danger rating system indicates an 

extreme fire danger level. 

(b) EXCEPTION.—The Secretary may authorize a prescribed burn 

under a condition described in subsection (a) if the Secretary coordinates with the applicable State government and local fire officials. 

(c) REPORT.—At the end of each fiscal year, the Secretary 

shall submit to Congress a report describing— 

(1) the number and locations of prescribed burns during 

that fiscal year; and 

Coordination. 

16 USC 551c–1. 

16 USC 551c–1 

note. 

16 USC 551 note. 

Prescribed Burn 

Approval Act of 

2016. 

Dec. 14, 2016 

[S. 3395] 


kgrant on DSKB33CYQ1 with PUBLAW
130 STAT. 1406 PUBLIC LAW 114–275—DEC. 14, 2016 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 3395: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

Nov. 17, considered and passed Senate. 

Dec. 5, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

(2) each prescribed burn during that fiscal year that was 

authorized by the Secretary pursuant to subsection (b). 

Approved December 14, 2016. 


kgrant on DSKB33CYQ1 with PUBLAW
-1- 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

COURT OF APPEALS 

WEBSTER TOWNSHIP, 

 Plaintiff/Counter-DefendantAppellee, 

and 

JOHN SCHARF, ANDREA SCHARF, DUNCAN 

J.J. MAGOON AND MARILYN J MAGOON 

REVOCABLE TRUST, and SUBHAM 

HOLDINGS, L.L.C. 

 Intervening Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

UNPUBLISHED 

June 7, 2016 

v No. 325008 

Washtenaw Circuit Court 

DANIEL WAITZ, LAURA WAITZ, and 

COTTONWOOD BARN, L.L.C., 

LC No. 2013-000948-CZ 

 Defendants/Counter-PlaintiffsAppellants. 

Before: O’CONNELL, P.J., and OWENS and BECKERING, JJ. 

OWENS, J. (concurring). 

 I concur in the result reached by the majority opinion for the reasons given in Judge 

Beckering’s concurrence. 

/s/ Donald S. Owens
§ 14.5 Test samples. Upon request by MSHA, the applicant must submit 3 precut, unrolled, flat conveyor belt samples for flame testing. Each sample must be 60 ± 1 ⁄ 4 inches long (152.4 ±0.6 cm) by 9 ± 1 ⁄ 8 inches (22.9 ±0.3 cm) wide.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of TearLab Corp. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Elias Vamvakas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/ Elias VamvakasElias VamvakasChief Executive Officer





Dated:     March 29, 2011
Exhibit 10.50
 DESCRIPTION OF
2009 OFFICER BONUS PROGRAM
   1. Individual Performance
   2. Company Performance




---



##### 




    
    the effects of implementing new accounting pronouncements and changes in
accounting policies or methods;
    
    the effects of extraordinary items or other significant, unforeseen special
items on the Companys income statement or balance sheet;
    
    the effects of any gains or losses from asset sales; and
    
    changes in the Companys capitalization, such as the effects of a spin-off or
special dividend distribution.
 Discretionary Nature of the Bonus Program
  Administration of the Bonus Program
  Other Items
M. P. No. 76-442.

#### The Narragansett Electric Company *v.*William W. Harsch *et al.*

The petitioner’s motion for special assignment is granted and this case is assigned to the *922calendar for May 6, 1977, 9:30 a.m., for oral argument.

*Edwards & Angelí, Edward F. Kindle, Deming E. Sherman,*for petitioner.

*Julius C. Michaelson, Attorney General, B. Daniel Prentiss,*Special Asst. Attorney General, *Dennis J. Roberts II,*for Rhode Island Consumers’ Council, for respondents.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IMPSAT Fiber Networks on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Héctor Alonso, Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,that: 

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2. The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by theregistrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

Date: August 15, 2005 

 

 

The foregoing certification isbeing furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
§ 1228.107 Eligible cost of activities. ( a ) If a cooperative agreement provides for Federal funding, only costs directly associated with eligible activities undertaken by the State or Indian tribe under the terms of a cooperative agreement will be eligible for reimbursement. Costs of services or activities which cannot be directly related to the support of activities specified in the agreement will not be eligible for Federal funding or for inclusion in the State's share or in the Indian tribe's share of funding that may be established in the agreement.
( b ) Eligible costs are the cost of salaries and benefits associated with technical, support, and clerical personnel engaged in eligible activities; direct cost of travel, rentals, and other normal administrative activities in direct support of the project or projects; basic and specialized training for State and tribal participants; and cost of any contractual services which can be shown to be in direct support of the activities covered by the agreement. Each cooperative agreement shall contain detailed schedules identifying those activities and costs which qualify for funding and the procedures, timing, and mechanics for implementing Federal funding.
[49 FR 37348, Sept. 21, 1984, as amended at 56 FR 10512, Mar. 13, 1991]