alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 015

Attachment Name

Attachement 15 Pb,Zr water sample

Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.2, Sec.A, End IPt.2, Sec.A, End (#2)1 Pt.2, Sec.A, End (#3)1 Pt.2, Sec.A, End (#4)1j Pt.2, Sec.A, End (#5)

Does not contain CBI

Report Number

CONSi 10317786855351
Attachment 15

Collected water samples for lead and zirconium on January 13, 2011. Water samples were

collected at the point of discharge to the POTW. Lead strontium titanium zirconium oxide

powder (CAS # 61461-40-3) was the powder that passed thru the dedicated filtration system.
,SRQ1Q ertiied1401 Erie Blvd. East

Environmental SrcsNY 13210

Services, Inc. Fax 315-478-2107

REPORT OF ANALYSES

Lockheed Martin PROJECT NAME: Ceramics PMN

P.O. BoX 4840 EP6-48 DATE: 03/04/2011

Syracuse, NY 13221-4840

Attn: Philip D. Talucci

SAMPLE NUMBER- 605498 SAMPLE ID- Manhole J-1 SAMPLE MATRIX- Ww

DATE SAMPLED- 01/13/11 TIME SAMPLED- 1235

DATE RECEIVED- 01/13/11 SAMPLER- Greg Harger RECEIVED BY- RS

TIME RECEIVED- 1305 DELIVERED BY- Greg Harger TYPE SAMPLE- Grab

Page 1 of 1

SAMPLE PREP ANALYSIS

ANALYSIS METHOD DATE BY DATE TIME BY RESULT UNITS

Miscellaneous Analysis 01/25/11 ADR*

LeadI Total (Pb) EPA 200.7 01/17/11 AG 01/20/11 AG < 0.02 mg/L

Lead, Total (Pb) EPA 200.8 01/17/1li AG 02/11/11 ELS 0.0019 mg/L

Note: Revised report for Zirconium and Lead to report to a lower reporting level. This report replaces the report issued on

01/25/2011. Lead by Method EPA 200.8 performed by ELAP #11375.

*See Attached report.

NYSDOH LAB ID NO. 11246 APPROVED BY:__________________

(Tems nd ondtios o Reverse Si-de)

Barbara L. DuChene

Laboratory Manager

The analytical results on this sample are representative of the sample received by the Laboratory.
Adirondack Environmental Services, IncDte -Fbi

CLIENT: Certified Environnnal Services,, Inc. Client Samiple ID: 6015498

Work Order: 110114047 Collection Date: 1/131201.1

Reference: LIb Satnpie ID 1,10114047-0J02

PO#- 27106 Matrix: AQUEOUS

Analyses Result PQL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed

ICP METALS E200.7 Analyst'. SM

Prep: SW3010A - 1/17/2011

Zirconium < 0.010 0010 mgIL 1 1/27/2011 11 13.00 AM

Page 4 of 4
From: Szabo, Aaron [mailto:Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 10:37 PM

To: Nizich, Sharon; Barnett, Keith

Cc: Laity, Jim

Subject: Conclusion of EO 12866 and 13563 Review: NESHAP for Brick and Structural Clay 

Products Manufacturing and NESHAP for Clay Ceramics Manufacturing (RIN 2060-

AP69)

This email serves as notice that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has concluded its 

review with a finding of consistent with change under Executive Orders (EO) 12866 and 13563 of 

the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) final rule titled NESHAP for Brick and Structural 

Clay Products Manufacturing and NESHAP for Clay Ceramics Manufacturing (RIN 2060-AP69). 

Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Thank you.

Aaron L. Szabo

Policy Analyst

Office of Management and Budget

202-395-3621

Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov
TS-EMLA50/60/70/80

Attachment #8 

Pt. 2, Sec. B, End 

Worker/Occupational Exposure and Environmental Release Information on the New 

Chemical Substance at Industrial Sites Controlled by Others
### §44509. Demonstration projects

The Secretary of Transportation may carry out under this chapter demonstration projects that the Secretary considers necessary for research and development activities under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1181.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 44509 | 49 App.:2205(b)(1). | Sept. 3, 1982, Pub. L. 97–248, §506(b)(1), 96 Stat. 678; restated Dec. 30, 1987, Pub. L. 100–223, §105(b)(1), 101 Stat. 1490. |

Section
### §312a. Revocation of operator's license used in unlawful distribution of controlled substances

The Federal Communications Commission may revoke any private operator's license issued to any person under the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 151 et seq.) who is found to have willfully used said license for the purpose of distributing, or assisting in the distribution of, any controlled substance in violation of any provision of Federal law. In addition, the Federal Communications Commission may, upon the request of an appropriate Federal law enforcement agency, assist in the enforcement of Federal law prohibiting the use or distribution of any controlled substance where communications equipment within the jurisdiction of the Federal Communications Commission under the Communications Act of 1934 is willfully being used for purposes of distributing, or assisting in the distribution of, any such substance.

(Pub. L. 99–570, title III, §3451, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3207–103.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Communications Act of 1934, referred to in text, is act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, 48 Stat. 1064, which is classified principally to this chapter (§151 et seq.). For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 609 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, and also as part of the National Drug Interdiction Improvement Act of 1986, and not as part of the Communications Act of 1934 which comprises this chapter.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT 

_____________________

No. 10-10751

_____________________

VILLAS AT PARKSIDE PARTNERS, doing business as Villas at Parkside;

LAKEVIEW AT PARKSIDE PARTNERS, LIMITED, doing business as

Lakeview at Parkside; CHATEAU RITZ PARTNERS, doing business as

Chateau De Ville; MARY MILLER SMITH,

Plaintiffs - Appellees

vs.

THE CITY OF FARMERS BRANCH, TEXAS,

Defendant - Appellant

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VALENTIN REYES; ALICIA GARCIA; GINGER EDWARDS; JOSE

GUADALUPE ARIAS; AIDE GARZA,

Plaintiffs - Appellees

vs.

CITY OF FARMERS BRANCH,

Defendant - Appellant

__________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas, Dallas

__________________________

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion March 21, 2012, 5 Cir., 2012, 675 F.3d 802)

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 31, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk
1

Judge King did not participate.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, JOLLY, DAVIS, SMITH, GARZA, STEWART,

DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK, HAYNES,

GRAVES and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.1

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for

rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active

service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc

with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a

briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
### §6307. Notifications to Congress

(a) The Secretary shall notify the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives of any hearing, before the hearing occurs, investigating a major marine casualty involving a death under section 6301 of this title.

(b) The Secretary shall submit to a committee referred to in subsection (a) of this section information on a major marine casualty that is requested by that committee or the chairman of the committee if the submission of that information is not prohibited by a law of the United States.

(c) The Secretary shall submit annually to Congress a summary of the marine casualties reported during the prior fiscal year, together with a brief statement of action taken concerning those casualties.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 538; Pub. L. 107–295, title IV, §408(c)(1), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2117.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 6307 | 46:239(j)33:366 |

33:366

Subsection (a) requires the Secretary to notify the Merchant Marine and Fisheries Committee and the Senate Commerce Committee in advance of any hearing concerning a major marine accident (as defined by regulation) where there has been a loss of life.

Subsection (b) requires the Coast Guard to supply the Merchant Marine and Fisheries Committee and the Senate Commerce Committee with any requested marine casualty information, if its release is not specifically prohibited by law.

Subsection (c) requires the Secretary to submit an annual report to Congress summarizing the marine casualties reported during the prior fiscal year, with a brief statement of action taken concerning those casualties.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–295 substituted "Transportation and Infrastructure" for "Merchant Marine and Fisheries".
#### In the Matter of William F. Passannante against James M. Power et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, and Joseph M. Tocci et al.

Motion to dispense with printing the record on appeal and appellants’ points granted. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Bastow, JJ.
§ 203.83 What is in an administrative information report? This report identifies the field or lease for which royalty relief is requested and must contain the following items: ( a ) The field or lease name;
( b ) The serial number of leases we have assigned to the field, names of the lease title holders of record, the lease operators, and whether any lease is part of a unit;
( c ) Well number, API number, location, and status of each well that has been drilled on the field or lease or project (not required for non-oil and gas leases);
( d ) The location of any new wells proposed under the terms of the application (not required for non-oil and gas leases);
( e ) A description of field or lease history;
( f ) Full information as to whether you will pay royalties or a share of production to anyone other than the United States, the amount you will pay, and how much you will reduce this payment if we grant relief;
( g ) The type of royalty relief you are requesting;
( h ) Confirmation that BOEM approved a DOCD or supplemental DOCD (Deep Water expansion project applications only); and
( i ) A narrative description of the development activities associated with the proposed capital investments and an explanation of proposed timing of the activities and the effect on production (Deep Water applications only).
#### § 56.11005 Fixed ladder anchorage and toe clearance.

Fixed ladders shall be anchored securely and installed to provide at least 3 inches of toe clearance.
### §40127. Prohibitions on discrimination

(a) Persons in Air Transportation.—An air carrier or foreign air carrier may not subject a person in air transportation to discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, or ancestry.

(b) Use of Private Airports.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no State or local government may prohibit the use or full enjoyment of a private airport within its jurisdiction by any person on the basis of that person's race, color, national origin, religion, sex, or ancestry.

(Added Pub. L. 106–181, title VII, §706(a), Apr. 5, 2000, 114 Stat. 157.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable only to fiscal years beginning after Sept. 30, 1999, see section 3 of Pub. L. 106–181, set out as an Effective Date of 2000 Amendments note under section 106 of this title.

#### Training Policies Regarding Racial, Ethnic, and Religious Nondiscrimination

Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title IV, §407, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3330, provided that:

"(a) In General.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress [Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives] and the Secretary of Transportation a report describing—

"(1) each air carrier's training policy for its employees and contractors regarding racial, ethnic, and religious nondiscrimination; and

"(2) how frequently an air carrier is required to train new employees and contractors because of turnover in positions that require such training.

"(b) Best Practices.—After the date the report is submitted under subsection (a), the Secretary shall develop and disseminate to air carriers best practices necessary to improve the training policies described in subsection (a), based on the findings of the report and in consultation with—

"(1) passengers of diverse racial, ethnic, and religious backgrounds;

"(2) national organizations that represent impacted communities;

"(3) air carriers;

"(4) airport operators; and

"(5) contract service providers."
#### City of Buffalo, Respondent, v. Ferry-Woodlawn Realty Company, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Motion granted and execution of order stayed pending hearing and determination of appeal, and ease set down for argument on May 11, 1960, upon condition that appellants’ typewritten brief served on respondent on or before May 4, 1960, respondent’s typewritten brief served on appellant on Or before May 6, 1960, and printed records and briefs of both parties filed and served on or before May 9, 1960. (Order entered May 3, 1960.)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John O. Hunter, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County, dated December 29, 1961, which denied, without a hearing, his application for a new trial pursuant to subdivision 7 of section 465 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The defendant was convicted on April 23, 1958, in said court for manslaughter in the first degree, and sentenced as a second felony offender to serve a term of 25 to 40 years. The conviction was affirmed by this court (10 A D 2d 1007); leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals was denied on September 12, 1960; and certiorari was denied (365 U. S. 849). Order affirmed. The application here for a new trial was made on July 6, 1961. It was, therefore, untimely since it was made more than one year after the court rendered judgment (Code Crim. Pro., § 466). Defendant’s brief contains many allegations relating to the conduct of the trial. Several of them were not raised in the moving papers submitted to the County Court. Insofar as the moving papers may be treated as an application for a writ of error *coravn nobis,*they are insufficient to rebut the presumption of regularity and do not raise a material factual issue requiring a hearing (cf. *People ex rel. Williams*v. *Murphy,*6 N Y 2d 234; *People*v. *Tomaselli,*7 N Y 2d 350; *People*v. *Fanning,*300 N. Y. 593; *People*v. *Oddo,*300 N. Y. 649). Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### § 550.1471 Does the penalty affect whether I owe interest?

If you do not pay the penalty by the date required under § 550.1475(d), BOEM will assess you late payment interest on the penalty amount at the same rate interest is assessed under 30 CFR 1218.54.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SATPAL SINGH,

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General,

Respondent.

No. 19-70250

Agency No. A215-906-902

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 28, 2021**

Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH and OWENS, Circuit Judges, and ROBRENO,*** District 

Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) 

decision dismissing the appeal of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision for lack 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for 

decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno, United States District Judge for 

the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation.

FILED

AUG 2 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

of jurisdiction. Petitioner appealed the IJ’s denial of his motion to reopen his 

credible fear determination. We dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.

“We determine our own jurisdiction de novo.” Pena v. Lynch, 815 F.3d 452, 

455 (9th Cir. 2016) (citing Bolanos v. Holder, 734 F.3d 875, 876 (9th Cir. 2013)).

This court held in Singh v. Barr that it lacks jurisdiction over petitions seeking 

review of an IJ’s denial of a motion to reopen credible fear proceedings. 982 F.3d 

778, 784 (9th Cir. 2020) (“Read together, [8 U.S.C.] §§ 1252(a)(2)(A), (D) and 

1252(e) provide clear and convincing evidence that Congress intended to deprive 

circuit courts of appeals of jurisdiction to review expedited removal orders and 

related matters affecting those orders, including underlying negative credible fear 

determinations . . . .”). Accordingly, the review Petitioner seeks is outside of our 

jurisdiction.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Homeland Security Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2020-0708]
 AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
 ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation.
 SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce one safety zone for an annual firework display in the Area of Responsibility of the Captain of the Port Sector Puget Sound. This action is necessary to protect life and property from hazards associated with the firework display. During the enforcement periods, entry into, transit through, mooring, or anchoring within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Puget Sound or a Designated Representative.
 DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 165.1332 will be enforced for Alderbrook Resort & Spa Fireworks display from 5 p.m. on December 31, 2020, through 1 a.m. on January 1, 2021.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this notice of enforcement, call or email Lieutenant Peter J. McAndrew, Sector Puget Sound Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 206-217-6051, email 
                        *SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil.*


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce regulations in 33 CFR 165.1332 for the safety zone established for Annual Fireworks Displays in Hood Canal. These regulations will be enforced from 5 p.m. on December 31, 2020, through 1 a.m. on January 1, 2021, at the following locations: Event name
Location
Latitude
LongitudeAlderbrook Resort & Spa Fireworks
Hood Canal
47°21.033′ N
123°04.1′ W.
 This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on navigable waterways during this event. Our annual fireworks displays and other events in the Area of Responsibility of the Captain of the Port Sector Puget Sound (AOR) that require safety zones are listed in 33 CFR 165.1332. During the enforcement periods, as reflected in § 165.1332 (d), no vessel operator may enter, transit, moor, or anchor within this safety zone, except for vessels authorized by the Captain of the Port or Designated Representative. In addition to this notice of enforcement in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    , the Coast Guard plans to provide notification of this enforcement period via a Broadcast Notice to Mariners and a Local Notice to Mariners. Dated: December 7, 2020. P.M. Hilbert, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Puget Sound.


[FR Doc. 2020-27255 Filed 12-17-20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
#### § 550.130 [Reserved]
### §20121. Repair and replacement of damaged track inspection equipment

The Secretary of Transportation may receive and expend cash, or receive and utilize spare parts and similar items, from non-United States Government sources to repair damages to or replace United States Government-owned automated track inspection cars and equipment as a result of third-party liability for such damages, and any amounts collected under this section shall be credited directly to the Railroad Safety and Operations account of the Federal Railroad Administration and shall remain available until expended for the repair, operation, and maintenance of automated track inspection cars and equipment in connection with the automated track inspection program.

(Added Pub. L. 114–94, div. A, title XI, §11413(a), Dec. 4, 2015, 129 Stat. 1688.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 2015, see section 1003 of Pub. L. 114–94, set out as an Effective Date of 2015 Amendment note under section 5313 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In connection with the Quarterly Report of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Robert W. Thomson, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:




1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


/s/   Robert W. ThomsonRobert W. Thomson

Interim Chief Financial Officer, Principal Finance Officer

and Principal Accounting Officer

August 12, 2011
```

[114th Congress Public Law 295]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 130 STAT. 1508]]

Public Law 114-295
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  3031 Veterans Road West in Staten Island, New York, as the ``Leonard 
Montalto Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Dec. 16, 2016 -  [H.R. 5150]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LEONARD MONTALTO POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3031 Veterans Road West in Staten Island, New York, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Leonard Montalto Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Leonard 
Montalto Post Office Building''.

    Approved December 16, 2016.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5150:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016):
            Sept. 20, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 5, considered and passed Senate; passage vitiated.
            Dec. 9, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```