alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §11321. Scope of authority

(a) The authority of the Board under this subchapter is exclusive. A rail carrier or corporation participating in or resulting from a transaction approved by or exempted by the Board under this subchapter may carry out the transaction, own and operate property, and exercise control or franchises acquired through the transaction without the approval of a State authority. A rail carrier, corporation, or person participating in that approved or exempted transaction is exempt from the antitrust laws and from all other law, including State and municipal law, as necessary to let that rail carrier, corporation, or person carry out the transaction, hold, maintain, and operate property, and exercise control or franchises acquired through the transaction. However, if a purchase and sale, a lease, or a corporate consolidation or merger is involved in the transaction, the carrier or corporation may carry out the transaction only with the assent of a majority, or the number required under applicable State law, of the votes of the holders of the capital stock of that corporation entitled to vote. The vote must occur at a regular meeting, or special meeting called for that purpose, of those stockholders and the notice of the meeting must indicate its purpose.

(b) A power granted under this subchapter to a carrier or corporation is in addition to and changes its powers under its corporate charter and under State law. Action under this subchapter does not establish or provide for establishing a corporation under the laws of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §102(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 838.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 11341 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

A prior section 11321, Pub. L. 95–473, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1432, related to limitations on ownership of certain water carriers, prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

I, Ian Morris, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of HouseValues, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis annual report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to bedesigned under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: March 11, 2008
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders 

FCStone Group, Inc. 

 

We consent to the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statements Nos. 333-125889 and 333-134941 on Form S-8 of FCStone Group, Inc. and our report dated November 28, 2006, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial condition of FCStone Group, Inc. asof August 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended August 31, 2006, and all related financial statement schedules,which report appear in the August 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of FCStone Group, Inc. 

 

/s/ KMPG LLP 

 

Des Moines, Iowa 

November 28, 2006
### §14121. Definitions

In this subchapter, the following definitions apply:

(1) Carrier and broker.—The terms "carrier" and "broker" include a receiver or trustee of a carrier and broker, respectively.

(2) Association.—The term "association" means an organization maintained by or in the interest of a group of carriers or brokers providing transportation or service subject to jurisdiction under chapter 135 that performs a service, or engages in activities, related to transportation under this part.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §103, Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 892.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 11141 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Radale Imports, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ken Swanson,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      August 19, 2008


*/s/
                  Ken Swanson*Ken
                  SwansonChief
                  Executive Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Radale Imports, Inc. and will be retained by Radale Imports, Inc. and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 241 (Tuesday, December 15, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 81257-81258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27485]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-90615; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2020-065]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; 
Notice of Withdrawal of Proposed Rule Change To Lower the Enterprise 
License Fee for Broker-Dealers Distributing Nasdaq Basic to Internal 
Professional Subscribers as Set Forth in the Equity 7 Pricing Schedule, 
Section 147, and the Enterprise License Fee for Broker-Dealers 
Distributing Nasdaq Last Sale to Professional Subscribers at Equity 7, 
Section 139

December 9, 2020.
    On September 30, 2020, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Exchange'') 
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), 
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 \1\ 
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to lower the 
enterprise license fee for broker-dealers distributing Nasdaq Basic to 
internal professional subscribers as set forth in the Equity 7 Pricing 
Schedule, Section 147, and the enterprise license fee for broker-
dealers distributing Nasdaq Last Sale to professional subscribers at 
Equity 7, Section 139. The proposed rule change was published for 
comment in the Federal Register on October 20, 2020.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90177 (October 14, 
2020), 85 FR 66620. Comments on the proposed rule change can be 
found at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nasdaq-2020-065/srnasdaq2020065.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On November 23, 2020, the Exchange withdrew the proposed rule 
change (SR-NASDAQ-2020-065).


[[Page 81258]]


    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-27485 Filed 12-14-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### § 56.11014 Crossing moving conveyors.

Moving conveyors shall be crossed only at designated crossover points.
BobFrizzell FAACoordinator

M-5336A
U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building ground floor, Room W12-140 1200 New JerseyAvenue, SE. Washington, DC 20590 

# M7
AEROSPACE
AN Eu!rrSYsTEMS OFAMERICA,UC, CoMPANY

·--, ,..**~,** rJ .-:... :. L

Feb.25,2013

Subject: Docket number FAA-2000-8179, Exemption No. 5367Kfrom 14 CFR (FAR Section) 91.531 (a) (3), Expiration Date 03/31/2013
Dear Siror Madam: In accordance with FAR 11.25, M7 Aerospace requests a renewal of Exemption 5637K, which expires on 3/31/2013. That exemption allows M7 Aerospace's type rated company pilots to conduct experimental, maintenance test and ferry flights in the SA227-CC and SA227-DC airplanes without a second in command (SIC). It also permits all operators of M7 Aerospace commuter category airplanes (SA227-CC, SA227-DC and other airplanes on the same type certificate) to conduct flight operations without a designated second-in-command pilot, provided the airplane is type certificated for single-pilot operations and the airplane is carrying nine orfewer passengers. Regulations affected: 14 CFR 91.531 (a)(3) requires two pilots for all large commuter category airplanes having a passenger seating configuration often or more seats, regardless ofthe passenger load orof FAA approval ofthe airplane for single-pilot operation. Reliefsought: M7 Aerospace LP asks that exemption 5367K be renewed to continue to allow M7 Aerospace's type rated company pilots to conduct experimental, maintenance test, and ferry flights in the SA227-CC and SA227-DC airplanes without a second in command (SIC); and to continue to permit all operators of M7 Aerospace commuter category airplanes (SA227-CC and SA227-DC and other airplanes on the same typecertificate) to conduct flight operations without a designated second-in-command pilot, provided the airplane is type certificated for single-pilot operations and the airplane is carrying nine orfewer passengers. Justification: The justification detailed in exemption 5367K remains appropriate and ample. We believe that an extension ofthis exemption will continue to provide M7 Aerospace and ouroperators (meeting the requirements ofthis exemption) increased operating flexibility and reduced economic burdens. Public Interest: An amendmentto this exemption will benefitthe public by reducing the cost offlight test and ferrying aircraft and by reducing the cost ofdoing business, a costthat ultimately is passed on to the public. This exemption allows us to conduct all necessaryflight operations in preparation for delivery ofthe airplane to the customer without a second-in-command. The absence ofa second in command does not affect public safety, and reduces the final cost of maintenance ofcustomer's aircraft. Federal Register Summary: Petitioner: M7 Aerospace LLC Section ofthe FAR affected: 14CFR 91.531(a) (3) Description of Relief SoughtTo renew exemption 5367K. Yours truly, M7 Aerospace LLC

Bob Frizzell FAA Coordinator
§ 27.11 Extension of certification. If an applicant desires to change any feature of a certified system or component, he shall first obtain MSHA's approval of the change, pursuant to the following procedure: ( a ) ( 1 ) Application shall be made as for an original certification, requesting that the existing certification be extended to cover the proposed changes. The application shall include complete drawings, specifications, and related data, showing the changes in detail.
( 2 ) Where the applicant for approval has used an independent laboratory under part 6 of this chapter to perform, in whole or in part, the necessary testing and evaluation for approval of changes to an approved product under this part, the applicant must provide to MSHA as part of the approval application: ( i ) Written evidence of the laboratory's independence and current recognition by a laboratory accrediting organization;
( ii ) Complete technical explanation of how the product complies with each requirement in the applicable MSHA product approval requirements;
( iii ) Identification of components or features of the product that are critical to the safety of the product; and
( iv ) All documentation, including drawings and specifications, as submitted to the independent laboratory by the applicant and as required by this part.
( b ) The application will be examined by MSHA to determine whether inspection and testing of the modified system or component or of a part will be required. MSHA will inform the applicant whether testing is required and the component or components and related material to be submitted for that purpose.
( c ) If the proposed modification meets the requirements of this part, a formal extension of certification will be issued, accompanied by a list of revised drawings and specifications which MSHA has added to those already on file.
[31 FR 10607, Aug. 9, 1966, as amended at 52 FR 17515, May 8, 1987; 68 FR 36421, June 17, 2003]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9397 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9397

    To prohibit Federal funds from being made available to any law 
enforcement agency that employs an alien as a law enforcement officer, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 23, 2024

 Mrs. Cammack introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit Federal funds from being made available to any law 
enforcement agency that employs an alien as a law enforcement officer, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Citizen-Only Police Act of 2024'' or 
the ``COP Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON AVAILABILITY OF FEDERAL FUNDS.

    No Federal funds may be made available to any law enforcement 
agency that employs an alien as a law enforcement officer.
                                 <all>
```
### Part II—Radio Equipment and Radio Operators On Board Ship
§ 1218.55 Interest payments to Indians. ( a ) All interest collected from unpaid or underpayments on Indian tribal or allotted leases will be paid to the tribe or allottee.
( b ) Any disbursement of Indian mineral revenues not made by the due date as required in § 1219.103 of this chapter shall accrue interest.
( c ) Interest shall be computed at the underpayment rate established by the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. 6621(a)(2) (Supp. 1987).
( d ) The interest shall be payable only for the number of days the disbursement is late.
[49 FR 37346, Sept. 21, 1984, as amended at 55 FR 37230, Sept. 10, 1990]
EXHIBIT 31

CERTIFICATION TO BE
PROVIDED WITH FORM 10-K

Re:	Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. Trust 2004-HE5 (the "Trust"), Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-HE5, issued pursuant to the Pooling
and Servicing Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2004 (the "Pooling and Servicing
Agreement"), among Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc., as depositor, Chase
Manhattan Mortgage Corporation, as a servicer, ("Chase"), Countrywide Home
Loans Servicing LP, as a servicer ("Countrywide"), HomEq Servicing Corporation,
as a servicer ("HomEq" and, together with Chase and Countrywide, the
"Servicers"), Accredited Home Lenders, Inc., as a responsible party, NC Capital
Corporation, as a responsible party and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company,
as trustee (the "Trustee")

             I, [identify the certifying individual], certify that:

            (1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K (the
"Annual Report"), and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution reports
(collectively with this Annual Report, the "Reports") filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this Annual Report, of the Trust;

            (2) Based on my knowledge, the information in the Reports, taken
as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as
of the last day of the period covered by this Annual Report;

            (3) Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing
information required to be provided to the Trustee by each Servicer under the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement, for inclusion in the Reports is included
in the Reports;

            (4) Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement
included in this Annual Report and required to be delivered to the Trustee in
accordance with the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, and except as
 disclosed in the Reports, each Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
 the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

            (5) The Reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to
the applicable Servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based
upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting
 a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement, that is included in the Reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  the Trustee and the
Servicers.

Date:	________________________________

[Signature]
[Title]
§ 553.21 How can I use self-insurance as OSFR evidence? ( a ) If you use self-insurance to satisfy all or part of your obligation to demonstrate OSFR, you must annually pass either a net worth test under § 553.25 or an unencumbered net asset test under § 553.28.
( b ) To establish the amount of self-insurance allowed, you must submit evidence of your net worth under § 553.23 or evidence of your unencumbered assets under § 553.26.
( c ) You must identify a U.S. agent for service of process.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9428 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9428

        To increase the penalties for breach of a military base.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 30, 2024

Mr. Arrington introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To increase the penalties for breach of a military base.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASING PENALTIES FOR BREACH OF MILITARY BASE.

    Section 1382 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``six months'' and inserting ``1 year''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 401.558 Physical condition standards.

The Restructuring Plan must require the owner to maintain the project in a decent and safe condition that meets the applicable standards under this section. As long as project-based assistance is provided, the applicable standards are the physical conditions standards for HUD housing in § 5.703 of this title. At any other time, the applicable standards are the local housing codes or codes adopted by the public housing agency if such codes meet or exceed the standards in § 5.703 of this title and do not severely restrict housing choice or, if there are no such local housing codes or codes adopted by the public housing agency, the standards in § 5.703 of this title will apply. In addition, any unit in which the tenant receives tenant-based assistance must comply with the housing quality standards of the section 8 tenant-based programs.

[65 FR 15485, Mar. 22, 2000, as amended at 65 FR 53901, Sept. 6, 2000]