alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ESTE CONSEJO SE REFIERE A LOS PESCADOS Y MARISCOS COLECTIVAMENTE COMO “PESCADO”. / CONSEJO ACTUALIZADO EN ENERO DE 2017

www.FDA.gov/fishadvice

www.EPA.gov/fishadvice

Macarela rey o caballa

Reloj anaranjado, raya o pez emperador

Aguja

Tiburón

Pez espada

Para las mujeres en edad reproductiva 

(aproximadamente entre los 16 y los 49 

años de edad), especialmente para las 

embarazadas y las que están amamantando, 

y para los padres y cuidadores de niños 

pequeños.

Coma de 2 a 3 porciones de pescado por 

semana de la lista “Mejores opciones” o 1 

porción de la lista “Buenas opciones”.

Coma una variedad de pescados.

Sirva de 1 a 2 porciones de pescado por 

semana a los niños, a partir de los 2 años de 

edad.

Si come pescado capturado por familiares o 

amigos, consulte las recomendaciones sobre 

el consumo de pescado. Si no hay ninguna 

recomendación, coma solo una porción y 

ningún otro pescado esa semana.*

Puede usar esta tabla como ayuda para elegir 

qué pescados comer y con qué frecuencia, en 

función de sus niveles de mercurio. Las 

“Mejores opciones” tienen los menores 

niveles de mercurio.

¡Use esta tabla!

¿Qué 

es una 

porción?

Para darse una 

idea, ¡use la 

palma de su 

mano!

Para niños 

de 4 a 7 años 

2 onzas 

Para un 

adulto

4 onzas

Lo Que las Embarazadas 

y los Padres Deben Saber

El pescado y otros alimentos 

ricos en proteínas tienen 

nutrientes que pueden 

ayudar al crecimiento y des

arrollo de su hijo.

Consejos Sobre 

el Consumo de 

Pescado

Mejores opciones COMER DE 2 A 3 

PORCIONES POR SEMANA Buenas opciones COMER 1 PORCIÓN POR SEMANA

Opciones a evitar LOS MÁS ALTOS NIVELES DE MERCURIO

Sardina

Corvina

Caballa

Róbalo

Palometa

Salmón 

Almeja 

Bacalao

Cangrejo 

Calamar

Eglefino

Merluza

Arenque 

Tilapia 

Lisa o pargo

Ostra

Lucio

Vieira 

Lacha 

Camarón 

Raya

Pejerrey

Lenguado 

Cangrejo de río 

Perca, de agua dulce y de mar

Boquerón o anchoa

Platija o lenguado

Gado o abadejo 

Pez gato o bagre

Trucha, de agua dulce

Atún, enlatado claro

(incluye el bonito)

Pescado blanco

Estornino del Pacífico

Platija o lenguado

Lutjánido o pargo

Caballa española

Chopa

Carpa

Mero

Rape

Pez azul o anjova

Halibut o fletán

Dorado/pez delfín

Bacalao negro

Perca rayada (de mar)

Blanquillo o lofolátilo

(Océano Atlántico) 

Atún, albacora/blanco, 

enlatado y fresco/congelado

(Atún, aleta amarilla)

Corvinata real/trucha de mar

Corvina blanca/Corvina del Pacífico

Gallineta o pescado de roca

Bagre búfalo (o bagre boca chica)

Perca de mar chilena/Merluza negra 

Blanquillo o lofolátilo (Golfo de México)

Atún de ojos grandes o patudo

* Algunos pescados capturados por familiares y amigos, como la carpa grande, el pez

 gato, la trucha y la perca, es más probable que tengan recomendaciones de 

 consumo debido al mercurio u otros contaminantes. Las recomendaciones estatales

 le dirán con qué frecuencia puede comer esos pescados en forma segura.

O
```

EXHIBIT 99-31

                    SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Michael J. Pankey, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Long Beach Acceptance Corp., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of Long Beach Acceptance
Auto Receivables Trust 2004-B;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the servicing information required to be provided to
the trustee by the servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the
"Agreement") is included in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer under
the Agreement and based upon the review required under the Agreement, and except
as disclosed in the report, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the
Agreement; and

5. I have disclosed to Deloitte and Touche LLP, the Company's Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm, all significant deficiencies relating to
internal control as it relates to the servicer's compliance with the minimum
servicing standards, as derived from the Mortgage Bankers' Association of
America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers in accordance
with an attestation conducted in compliance with the applicable professional
attestation standards (AICPA and PCAOB), and as set forth in the Agreement.

Date: March 30, 2005
      --------------

By:  Long Beach Acceptance Corp., as Servicer

/s/ Michael J. Pankey
---------------------------------------
         Michael J. Pankey
         Executive Vice President and
         Chief Financial Officer
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2590

WILLIAM F. ALLEN, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TIME WARNER CABLE, et al.; HOWARD STERN SHOW;JERRY SPRINGER SHOW; CHANNEL 12, WBOY, INCORPORATED CORPORATION, et al.; CHANNEL 5, WDTV,WITHE-BROADCASTING LOCAL STATIONS; NBC NETWORK; CBS NETWORK, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-177-1) Submitted: January 13, 2000 Decided: January 19, 2000 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William F. Allen, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:William F. Allen, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Allen v. Time Warner Cable , No. CA-99-177-1 (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 22, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 23.1


	
                      INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


	We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration 
Statement of Baker Hughes Incorporated on Form S-8 of our report dated 
February 17, 1999 (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an 
explanatory paragraph relating to the change in the method of accounting 
for impairment of long-lived assets to be disposed of to conform with 
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, as discussed in Note 
2), incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Baker 
Hughes Incorporated for the year ended December 31, 1998.



Deloitte & Touche LLP



Houston, Texas
March 23, 1999
#### § 256.72 Compensatory payments as production.

If an oil and gas lessee makes compensatory payments and if the lease is not being maintained in force by other production of oil or gas in paying quantities or by other approved drilling or reworking operations, such payments shall be considered as the equivalent of production in paying quantities for all purposes of the lease.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                        TURBODYNE FILES PRELIMINARY PROXY


CARPINTERIA, CA - APRIL 7, 2000 - Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. (EASDAQ:TRBD)
today filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Market Authority
of the European Association of Securities Dealers' Automated Quotation (EASDAQ)
a preliminary proxy statement which is available on our website and through the
SEC Edgar filing system.

Turbodyne Technologies Inc., a California based high technology company,
specializes in the development of charging technology for internal combustion
engines plus the development and manufacturing of high-tech assemblies for
electrically assisted turbochargers and superchargers. Turbodyne Technologies
Inc.'s headquarters is located in Carpinteria, CA; the European business
location is Frankfurt, Germany. Additional information about the company is
available on the Internet at http://www.turbodyne.com.

Contacts:

Corporate Communications, Peter Weichselbraun (800) 566-1130
VP Group Finance - Investor Relations, Ken Fitzpatrick (800) 566-1130
European Investor Relations, Markus Kumbrink +49-69-975-44-665
00URT0FCRIMINALAPPBAL8 „ „cMIPD -r" ' / afc- / /, ^ 

### RB 20 2015 MOTtOWOENIED /^/^^/y1/^. 7HffW^(g\ AMAcosia,Clerk ~V ~7/- / /i^ --'•t

£//S/r)iSSu,~& Alnt //./>-? /MsTof/fa&4*/£#/£< /^nOrjW Ufti. /Ifac/aFa/i&&faj <&?s ZMhmX. -fetid* 9fr rCJ. 

## iv/fatetz efw# ^^ 4^*r J&hfr*/> oJ 0/'tf/&faJ /hefct? Mrs £'<sev /W o/v/WissaSs fat/ /nrfo/izr/ -/» /Us/hefaiy o/L /32s^ ^ «£3£^6^/^



### &<#e//QWi&rf' /ifa* r 4M//v&&t/6e/ //eOu/iu/-£&<t/

^ 

## cfa&^^-i^Aefcfc (fe^5e/&l^diH& 

# y2<y*$•S&j/jtyse//fate,f
Order entered August 19, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00123-CV

SAMUELS AND SONS, LLC, Appellant

V.

CAROLINE WILLIAMSON, MARY TUCKER, AND JACOB SHAPE,

Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-20-00796-D

ORDER

Before the Court are appellant’s motion to extend time to file brief and 

appellees’ response in opposition. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief 

be filed no later than September 20, 2021.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
#### Connecticut National Bank *v.*Investors Capital Corporation et al.

*Richard P. Weinstein,*in support of the petition.

*Theodore R. Killiam,*in opposition.

Decided September 25, 1992

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 48, is denied.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Geochemicalmaps of stream sediments in central Colorado, from New Mexico to Wyoming**
 
Report
 
Read Me
 
Metadata:
CCAP Boundary XML
 
CCAP Geochemistry Samples XML
 
Layers XML
Datafiles:
CCAP Geochemistry ZIP
 
Layers ZIP
 
Shapefiles ZIP
 
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.76:2015-1025
Item Number:0624-H (online)
CGP systemNumber:000944638
 
June 4, 2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          21,974
<SECURITIES>                                     6,093
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3684
<ALLOWANCES>                                       806
<INVENTORY>                                         87
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,057
<PP&E>                                          10,332
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,255
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,898
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,790
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            99
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,009
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,898
<SALES>                                          1,702
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,907
<CGS>                                              312
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,640
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,267
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (11)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,321
<INCOME-TAX>                                       766
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,555
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,555
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
        

</TABLE>
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-91,369-01

EX PARTE PERVIS LEE ANDREWS, JR., Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. C-297-W011657-1436114-A IN THE 297TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM TARRANT COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of aggravated assault and sentenced to life imprisonment. The

Second Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Andrews v. State, No. 02-17-00052-CR (Tex.

App.—Fort Worth July 12, 2018) (not designated for publication). Applicant filed this application

for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this

Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

In three grounds, Applicant contends that trial counsel was ineffective. The trial court signed

an order designating issues and directed counsel to respond, but this application was forwarded

before the trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law. See TEX. R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(5).

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
2

466 U.S. 668 (1984). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate

forum for findings of fact. TEX.CODECRIM.PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial

counsel to respond to Applicant’s grounds. In developing the record, the trial court may use any

means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). Applicant appears to be represented by counsel. If he is not

and the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If

Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel

to represent him at the hearing. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or

retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whethertrial counsel’s

performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court may make any other

findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP.P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: October 21, 2020

Do not publish
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER OF TRAMMELL CROW COMPANYPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

In connection withthe accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,2006, and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Derek R. McClain, Chief Financial Officer of Trammell CrowCompany (the “Company”), hereby certify that:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|                             | /s/ DEREK  R. MCCLAIN  |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                        | Name: Derek R. McClain |
| Date: November 9, 2006 |                        |

 

----
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Joseph Johnson

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 394 (AC 10360), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Was the Appellate Court correct in finding that the improper exclusion of impeachment evidence did not constitute a constitutional violation to the defend*921ant’s right to confront and cross-examine witnesses under article first, § 8 of the Connecticut constitution?

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14660.

*Denise Derby,*in support of the petition.

*Rita M. Shair,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided December 22, 1992

*“2.*Was the Appellate Court correct in finding harmless error where the trial court had improperly excluded expert testimony, as a discovery sanction, offered to impeach the credibility of an eyewitness identification made by a police officer?”
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1508 What must I do when BSEE administers written or oral tests? BSEE or its authorized representative may test your employees or contract personnel at your worksite or at an onshore location. You and your contractors must: ( a ) Allow BSEE or its authorized representative to administer written or oral tests; and
( b ) Identify personnel by current position, years of experience in present position, years of total oil field experience, and employer's name (e.g., operator, contractor, or sub-contractor company name).
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 11:06 AM

To: 'pwa850@gmail.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Petition for Exemption: Personal Pres ence Home Watchers and Service LLC (FAA-2015-2650)



### Dear Mr. Anderson:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-2650). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, S ection 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operat ion please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If
you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the in formation described above by September 30, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999.

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108
Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division
Editorial Note on Part 1206
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1206 (formerly part 206) appear at 67 FR 19111, Apr. 18, 2002.

§ 1206.177 What general requirements regarding transportation allowances apply to me? ( a ) When you value gas under § 1206.174 at a point off the lease, unit, or communitized area (for example, sales point or point of value determination), you may deduct from value a transportation allowance to reflect the value, for royalty purposes, at the lease, unit, or communitized area. The allowance is based on the reasonable actual costs you incurred to transport unprocessed gas, residue gas, or gas plant products from a lease to a point off the lease, unit, or communitized area. This would include, if appropriate, transportation from the lease to a gas processing plant off the lease, unit, or communitized area and from the plant to a point away from the plant. You may not deduct any allowance for gathering costs.
( b ) You must allocate transportation costs among all products you produce and transport as provided in § 1206.178.
( c ) ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraphs (c)(2) and (3) of this section, your transportation allowance deduction for each sales type code may not exceed 50 percent of the value of the unprocessed gas, residue gas, or gas plant product. For purposes of this section, natural gas liquids are considered one product.
( 2 ) If you ask ONRR, ONRR may approve a transportation allowance deduction in excess of the limitations in paragraph (c)(1) of this section. To receive this approval, you must demonstrate that the transportation costs incurred in excess of the limitations in paragraph (c)(1) of this section were reasonable, actual, and necessary. Under no circumstances may an allowance reduce the value for royalty purposes under any sales type code to zero.
( 3 ) Your application for exception (using Form ONRR-4393, Request to Exceed Regulatory Allowance Limitation) must contain all relevant and supporting documentation necessary for ONRR to make a determination.
( d ) If ONRR conducts a review or audit and determines that you have improperly determined a transportation allowance authorized by this subpart, then you will be required to pay any additional royalties, plus interest determined in accordance with § 1218.54 of this chapter. Alternatively, you may be entitled to a credit, but you will not receive any interest on your overpayment.
[64 FR 43515, Aug. 10, 1999, as amended at 73 FR 15891, Mar. 26, 2008]
TABLE OF CONTENTS     ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS  3      ARTICLE 2. TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES  3      ARTICLE 3. STRATEGIC CONSULTING SERVICE FEE  4      ARTICLE 4. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES  4      ARTICLE 5. CONFIDENTIALITY  4      ARTICLE 6. GOVERNING LAW AND EVENTS OF DEFAULT  4      ARTICLE 7. DISPUTE RESOLUTION  4      ARTICLE 8. EFFECTIVENESS  5      ARTICLE 9. NO SUBSEQUENT OBLIGATION  5      ARTICLE 10. TRANSFER LIMITATION  5      ARTICLE 11. COMPENSATION  5      ARTICLE 12. AMENDMENT  5      ARTICLE 13. COUNTERPARTS  5      ARTICLE 14. MISCELLANEOUS  5      EXHIBIT 1 CONTENT OF THE STRATEGIC CONSULTING SERVICES  6      EXHIBIT 2 STRATEGIC CONSULTING SERVICE FEE  7 
 
2

 
STRATEGIC CONSULTING SERVICE AGREEMENTThis Strategic Consulting Service Agreement (“this Agreement”) is entered into in Beijing, thePeople’s Republic of China (the “PRC”) on November 25, 2009 beween:Party A: Fortune (Beijing) Yingchuang Technology Co., Ltd.
§ 1218.100 Royalty and rental payments. ( a ) *Payment of royalties and rentals.* As specified under the provisions of the lease, the lessee shall submit all rental payments when due and shall pay in value or deliver in production all royalties in the amounts of value or production determined by ONRR to be due.
( b ) If the lessor elects to take royalty in oil or gas, unless otherwise agreed upon, such royalty shall be delivered on the leasehold, by the lessee to the order of and without cost to the lessor, as instructed by the Director.
( c ) *Method of payment.* The payor shall tender all payments in accordance with § 1218.51.
[47 FR 47773, Oct. 27, 1982. Redesignated at 48 FR 35641, Aug. 5, 1983, and amended at 52 FR 23815, June 25, 1987]