alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 401.6 Designation of institutes. ( a ) As a condition of recognition as an established institute under the provisions of this chapter, each institute shall provide to the Director written evidence that it conforms to the requirements of subsection 104(a) of the Act, in that: ( 1 ) The institute is established at the college or university in the State that was established in accordance with the Act of July 21, 1862 (12 Stat. 503; 7 U.S.C. 301ff), *i.e.,* a “land-grant” institution, or;
( 2 ) If established at some other institution, the institute is at a college or university that has been designated by act of the legislature for the purposes of the Act, or;
( 3 ) If there is more than one “land-grant” institution in the State, and no designation has been made according to paragraph (a)(2) of this section, the institute has been established at the one such institution designated by the Governor of the State to participate in the program, or;
( 4 ) The institute has been designated as an interstate or regional institute by two or more cooperating States as provided in the Act.
( b ) The certification of designation made pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section shall originate following the issuance of these regulations, be signed by the highest ranking officer of the college or university at which the institute is established and be submitted to the Director within 90 days of the effective date of these regulations. It shall be accompanied either by the evidence of establishment under the provisions of 30 CFR part 401 or by new evidence of establishment made pursuant to these regulations.
( c ) Any institute not previously established under the provisions of the Water Resources Act of 1964 (Pub. L. 88-379, 78 Stat. 331) or the Water Research and Development Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95-467, 92 Stat. 1305) shall also, in addition to the annual program application specified in § 401.11 of this chapter, submit to the Director the following information: ( 1 ) Evidence of the appointment by the governing authority of the college or university of an officer to receive and account for all funds paid under the provisions of the Act and to make annual reports to the granting agency on work accomplished; and
( 2 ) A management plan for meeting the requirements of the evaluation mandated by § 401.26.
[50 FR 23114, May 31, 1985, as amended at 58 FR 27204, May 7, 1993]
```

Authorization

The undersigned hereby appoints each of Peter Pounds, Lynda Tarbath, Bryan Fick, and Carren Walters, signing singly, the undersigned's true and lawful attorney-in-fact to:

(1) execute for and on the behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned's capacity as an affiliate of General Communication, Inc. (the "Company"), Form 4 and Form 5 in accordance with section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules thereunder;

(2) do and perform any and all acts for and on behalf of the undersigned which may be necessary or desirable to complete and execute any such Form 4 and Form 5, complete and execute any amendment or amendments thereto, and timely file such form with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any stock exchange or similar authority; and

(3) take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit to, in the best interest of, or legally required by, the undersigned, it being understood that the documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on behalf of the undersigned pursuant to this Power of Attorney shall be in such form and shall contain such terms and conditions as such attorney-in-fact may approve in such attorney-in-fact's discretion.

    The undersigned hereby grants to each such attorney-in-fact full power and authority to do and perform any and every act and thing whatsoever requisite, necessary, or proper to be done in the exercise of any of the rights and powers herein granted, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do if personally present, with full power of substitution or revocation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact, or such attorney-in-fact's substitute or substitutes, shall lawfully  do or cause to be done by virtue of this power of attorney and the rights and powers herein granted.  The undersigned acknowledges that the foregoing attorneys-in-fact, in serving in such capacity at the request of the undersigned, are not assuming, nor is the Company assuming, any of the undersigned's responsibilities to comply with section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

    This Power of Attorney shall remain in full force and effect until the undersigned is no longer required to file Form 4 and Form 5, with respect to the undersigned's holdings of and transactions in securities issued by the Company' unless earlier revoked by the undersigned in a signed writing delivered to the foregoing attorneys-in-fact.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Power of Attorney to be executed effective as of February 27, 2014.

/s/ Jerry A. Edgerton
Signature

Jerry Edgerton
Print Name

State of Alaska    )
Third Judicial District    ) ss.

The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 27th day of February, 2014 by Jerry A. Edgerton.

/s/ Tessa Holcomb
Notary Public in and for the State of Alaska

My commission expires: February 12, 2018

[SEAL]
```
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Richard J. Tanzella

*Jon L. Schoenhorn,*in support of the petition.

*Jack W. Fischer,*deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided October 30, 1992

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 28 Conn. App. 581, is denied.
<PAGE>   1




                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1

                          MEDICAL MANAGER CORPORATION
                     BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
         FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND MARCH 31, 1998
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      THREE MONTHS          THREE MONTHS
                                                          ENDED                 ENDED
                                                     MARCH 31, 1999        MARCH 31, 1998
                                                     --------------        ---------------
<S>                                                  <C>                   <C>
Net Income                                               $ 5,552               $ 3,530
                                                         =======               =======

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:
------------------------------------------------

Weighted average common shares outstanding                22,363                20,541
                                                         =======               =======

Basic earnings per share                                 $  0.25               $  0.17
                                                         =======               =======

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
------------------------------------------------

Weighted average common shares outstanding                22,363                20,541
Effect of dilutive shares
      Stock awards                                             0                    36
      Stock options                                          925                   904
                                                         -------               -------
Diluted shares                                            23,288                21,481
                                                         =======               =======

Diluted earnings per share                               $  0.24               $  0.16
                                                         =======               =======
</TABLE>
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3536 

To amend the Federal Crop Insurance Act to expand the Agricultural 

Management Assistance Program to include the State of Hawaii. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2005 

Mr. CASE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Crop Insurance Act to expand the 

Agricultural Management Assistance Program to include 

the State of Hawaii. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF THE AGRICULTURAL MANAGE4 MENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. 

5 Section 524(b)(1) of the Federal Crop Insurance Act 

6 (7 U.S.C. 1524(b)(1)) is amended by inserting ‘‘Hawaii,’’ 

7 after ‘‘Delaware,’’. 

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-4446

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. JOSE ROSA CAMPA-MACIAS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:06-cr-00070-FDW-1)

Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 23, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David L. Hitchens, LAW OFFICE OF DAVID L. HITCHENS, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Jose Rosa Campa-Macias pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute cocaine and aiding and abetting in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(b)(1)(A) (West 1999 & Supp. 2009) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (2006) and was sentenced to seventy-one months of imprisonment. On appeal, counsel has filed a brief pursuant

to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asserting there are no meritorious grounds for appeal, but raising the following issue: whether Campa-Macias voluntarily consented to the search of his vehicle which contained the drugs at issue. By pleading guilty Campa-Macias has waived all antecedent non-jurisdictional defects, including the denial of a motion to suppress. Tollett v. Henderson , 411 U.S. 258, 267 (1973); United States v. Willis , 992 F.2d 489, 490 (4th Cir. 1993). Once a plea of guilty has become final, this Court’s inquiry is limited to whether the underlying plea was counseled and voluntary. United States v. Broce , 488 U.S. 563, 569 (1989). Our review of the record reveals Campa-Macias knowingly and voluntarily pled guilty.

In accordance with Anders , we have reviewed the entire

record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the

23 United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3485 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3485

       To suspend temporarily the duty on certain work footwear.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2005

Mr. Ryun of Kansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on certain work footwear.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN WORK FOOTWEAR.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.64.12      Welt footwear with  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         outer soles of                                                     31/2009
                         rubber, plastics,
                         leather, or
                         composition
                         leather and
                         uppers of
                         pigskin,
                         incorporating a
                         protective metal
                         toe-cap (provided
                         for in subheading
                         6403.40.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### PEOPLE ex rel. BEEBE v. BOARD OF RAILROAD COM’RS et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

January 4, 1905.)

Proceedings by the people of the state of New York, on the relation of Orin M. Beebe, against the board of railroad commissioners of the state of New York, George W. Dunn and others, as railroad commissioners of the state of New York, and being the members of said board, and the Binghamton & Southern Railroad Company. No opinion. Determination of the railroad commissioners unanimously confirmed, without costs.
§ 1228.5 Delegation of authority. ( a ) Authority to enter into cooperative agreements to carry out audit and related investigation and enforcement activities with State and tribal governments has been delegated to the Director of the Office of Natural Resources Revenue (ONRR).
( b ) Authority to enter into cooperative agreements with State and tribal governments to carry out inspection and related investigation and enforcement activities has been delegated to the Director of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and is not covered by this part.
( c ) The entry into a cooperative agreement with either ONRR or BLM will not affect the ability of a State or Indian tribe to choose to enter into such an agreement with the other agency. A State may enter into a delegation agreement (30 U.S.C. 1735) with ONRR to perform certain functions without affecting its ability to enter into a cooperative agreement with either ONRR or BLM, or both, to cooperate in the performance of those functions which are not delegated in this part.
### §505. Penalty for violating regulation or order

A person convicted of knowingly and willfully violating a regulation or order of the Federal Maritime Commission or the Secretary of Transportation under subtitle IV or V of this title, for which no penalty is expressly provided, shall be fined not more than $500. Each day of a continuing violation is a separate offense.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §4, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1491.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 505 | 46 App.:1228 (last par.). | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title VIII, §806(d); as added Aug. 4, 1939, ch. 417, §13, 53 Stat. 1187; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(125), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 164. |

Section
#### Harry D. Parmlee, appellant, v. J. A. MacFarlane & Son, trading as Hotel Kenmore, appellee.

Gen. No. 27,931.

Action of replevin for personalty, claimed as innkeeper’s lien for rental. Judgment for defendants. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William R. Fetzer, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1922.

Reversed.

Opinion filed October 17, 1923.

Rush B. Johnson, for appellant. No appearance for appellee.

Mr. Justice Thomson

delivered the opinion of the court.
### SUBCHAPTER III—SAFETY REGULATION
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 239 (Friday, December 11, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80119-80120]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27288]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2010-D-0529]


Qualification Process for Drug Development Tools; Guidance for 
Industry; Availability; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice 
entitled ``Qualification Process

[[Page 80120]]

for Drug Development Tools; Guidance for Industry; Availability'' that 
appeared in the Federal Register of November 25, 2020. The document 
announced the availability of a final guidance for industry and FDA 
staff that met the 21st Century Cures Act's requirement to issue 
guidance on this qualification process and elaborated on the new 
qualification process and transparency requirements and discusses the 
taxonomy for biomarkers and other drug development tools. The document 
was published with incorrect information in the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 section. This document corrects that error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chris Leptak, Center for Drug 
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New 
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 22, Rm. 6461, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-0017; or Stephen Ripley, Center for Biologics Evaluation and 
Research, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301, Silver Spring, 
MD 20993-0002; 240-402-7911.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of November 25, 2020 
(85 FR 75334), in FR Doc. 2020-26051, the following correction is made:
    On page 75336, in the first column, under the heading, ``II. 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995'', the paragraph is corrected to read:
    ``While this guidance contains no collection of information, it 
does refer to previously approved FDA collections of information. 
Therefore, clearance by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521) is not 
required for this guidance. The previously approved collections of 
information are subject to review by OMB under the PRA. The collections 
of information pertaining to submissions of investigational new drug 
applications have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0014; the 
collections of information pertaining to submissions of new drug 
applications and abbreviated new drug applications have been approved 
under OMB control number 0910-0001; and the collections of information 
pertaining to submissions of biologics license applications in 21 CFR 
part 601 have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0338.''

    Dated: December 8, 2020.
Lauren K. Roth,
Acting Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-27288 Filed 12-10-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
### §15102. Definitions

In this part—

(1) Board.—The term "Board" means the Surface Transportation Board.

(2) Pipeline carrier.—The term "pipeline carrier" means a person providing pipeline transportation for compensation.

(3) Rate.—The term "rate" means a rate or charge for transportation.

(4) State.—The term "State" means a State of the United States and the District of Columbia.

(5) Transportation.—The term "transportation" includes—

(A) property, facilities, instrumentalities, or equipment of any kind related to the movement of property, regardless of ownership or an agreement concerning use; and

(B) services related to that movement, including receipt, delivery, transfer in transit, storage, handling, and interchange of property.

(6) United states.—The term "United States" means the States of the United States and the District of Columbia.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §106(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 921.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 10102 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
### §742. Acknowledgment of deeds

Deeds and other instruments affecting land situate in the District of Columbia, or any other territory or possession of the United States, may be acknowledged in Puerto Rico before any notary public appointed therein by proper authority, or any officer therein who has ex officio the powers of a notary public. The certificate by such notary shall be accompanied by the certificate of the executive secretary of Puerto Rico to the effect that the notary taking such acknowledgment is in fact such notarial officer.

(Mar. 2, 1917, ch. 145, §54, 39 Stat. 968; May 17, 1932, ch. 190, 47 Stat. 158.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in act Mar. 22, 1902, ch. 273, 32 Stat. 88, except that that act required the certificate of the attorney general of Puerto Rico, rather than of the executive secretary of Puerto Rico as required by this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Puerto Rico" substituted in text for "Porto Rico" pursuant to act May 17, 1932, which is classified to section 731a of this title.
#### RYALL *vs.*MAIX *&*CO.

[MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL.]

1. *Appeal; wkenwill not be dismissed.*— An appeal regularly and properly taken from a final judgment will not be dismissed, because a bill of exceptions contained in the record does not appear to bave been signed in term time, nor in ten days after adjournment of court in pursuance of ■written agreement of counsel.

*538This was a motion to dismiss the appeal in this case. The grounds of the motion are fully set forth in the opinion denying the motion.

J. T. Jones, for motion.

Eugene McOaa, *contra.*

PETERS, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal taken in this case, because it does not appear that the bill of exceptions was signed by the presiding judge before the adjournment of the court at which the exceptions were taken, nor in ten days afterwards by consent of counsel in writing. — Rev. Code, § 2760. Such a defect in the record does not vitiate the appeal, when it appears that there has been a final judgment in the ease in the court below, and that the appeal has been otherwise regularly taken, as is the case here. — Ref. Code, §§ 3485, 3488, 4420, 4421»

The motion is denied, with costs.
|     |                                                                                                                            |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|     |                                                                                                                                                     |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
| Date:  | November 5, 2015 | /s/ Ronald A. Duncan |
|   |   | Ronald A. Duncan |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   | General Communication, Inc. |