alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of IMPSAT Fiber Networks on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Ricardo A. Verdaguer, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the
registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date: August 15, 2005



/s/ Ricardo A. VerdaguerRicardo A. VerdaguerPresident and Chief Executive Officer




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
### §33111. Verifications involving motor vehicle major parts

(a) General Requirements.—A person engaged in the business of salvaging, dismantling, recycling, or repairing passenger motor vehicles may not knowingly sell in commerce or transfer or install a major part marked with an identification number without—

(1) first establishing, through a procedure the Attorney General by regulation prescribes in consultation with the Secretary of Transportation under section 33109 of this title, that the major part has not been reported as stolen; and

(2) providing the purchaser or transferee with a verification—

(A) identifying the vehicle identification number (or derivative of that number) of that major part; and

(B) verifying that the major part has not been reported as stolen.

(b) Nonapplication.—(1) Subsection (a) of this section does not apply to a person that—

(A) is the manufacturer of the major part;

(B) has purchased the major part directly from the manufacturer; or

(C) has received a verification from an insurance carrier under section 33110 of this title that the motor vehicle from which the major part is derived has not been reported as stolen, or that the carrier has not established whether that vehicle has been stolen.

(2) A person described under paragraph (1)(C) of this subsection that subsequently transfers or sells in commerce the motor vehicle or a major part of the vehicle shall provide the verification received from the carrier to the person to whom the vehicle or part is transferred or sold.

(c) Regulations.—The Attorney General shall prescribe regulations to carry out this section. The regulations shall include regulations prescribed in consultation with the Secretary that are necessary to ensure that a verification a person provides under subsection (a)(2) of this section is uniform, effective, and resistant to fraudulent use.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1086.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 33111(a) | 15:2026b(a). | Oct. 20, 1972, Pub. L. 92–513, 86 Stat. 947, §608; added Oct. 25, 1992, Pub. L. 102–519, §306(c), 106 Stat. 3397. |
| 33111(b) | 15:2026b(c) (1st, 2d sentences). | |
| 33111(c) | 15:2026b(b), (c) (last sentence). | |

Section

In subsection (a), before clause (1), the word "distribute" is omitted as being included in "sell". In clause (1), the word "establishing" is substituted for "determining" for clarity and consistency in the revised title.

Subsection (b)(2) is substituted for 15:2026b(c) (2d sentence) for clarity.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 103–272, §4(v), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1373, provided that: "Section 33111 of title 49, United States Code, as enacted by section 1 of this Act, is effective on the date on which the National Stolen Passenger Motor Vehicle Information System is established under section 33109 of title 49."
NUMBER 13-10-00367-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

JUAN HERNANDEZ, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 347th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Juan Hernandez, by and through his attorney, has filed a “Withdrawal of 

Notice of Appeal and Request to Dismiss Appeal” because he no longer desires to 

prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we 

grant the motion to withdraw the appeal and pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 42.2(a), dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's 
2

request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Delivered and filed the

26th day of August, 2010.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-01-2000
<CASH>                                          16,937
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  632,765
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    802,378
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                78,979
<PP&E>                                         325,692
<DEPRECIATION>                                  98,579
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,128,019
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,185,406
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,000
<COMMON>                                         4,273
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,413,871
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,128,019
<SALES>                                      2,107,835
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,122,184
<CGS>                                        1,004,992
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,004,992
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,111,916
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,023
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (34,747)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (34,747)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (34,747)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.01)


</TABLE>
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-40452

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MANUEL CASTRO-GUZMAN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:08-CR-1154-1

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Manuel CastroGuzman has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Castro-Guzman has not filed a

response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 6, 2010

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. [5th Circuit Case No.]

2

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3389 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain footwear for girls. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 21, 2005 

Mr. RYUN of Kansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain footwear for 

girls. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN FOOTWEAR FOR GIRLS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 
2 

•HR 3389 IH 

‘‘ 9902.64.18 Other footwear with outer 

soles of rubber, plastics, 

leather or composition leather and uppers of leather, valued not over $2.50 per pair, 

the foregoing not covering 

the ankle, other than house 

slippers and other than footwear for women (except footwear for women with pigskin 

uppers) (provided for in subheading 6403.99.75) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JUAN R. CASIANO
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1585

[ January 2, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Gary L. Sweet , Judge; L.T. Case No. 562016CF000060A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Erika Follmer, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marc B. Hernandez, Assistant Attorney General , West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

T

AYLOR

, C IKLIN and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive
        - Selective Service System

#  Selective Service System 

**Collected by:** Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive 

**Archived since:**Jul, 2014

**Description:**
The statutory missions of Selective Service are to be prepared to provide trained and untrained personnel to the Department of Defense in the event of a national emergency and to be prepared to implement an Alternative Service Program for registrants classified as conscientious objectors. The Selective Service System Web site has information on who should register for Selective Service, how to register, historical resources, annual reports, and social media links.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal,     	    Military & Veterans

**Collector:**    	    U.S. Government Publishing Office

## Narrow Your Results

### 

            There are no further ways to narrow your results.           

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear

              - Sites
              - Search Page Text

Page 1 of 1  (7 Total Results)

**Sort By:**
                - Title (A-Z)
                - Title (Z-A)
                - URL (A-Z)
                - URL (Z-A)

### URL:     http://www.youtube.com/user/SelectiveServ/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://twitter.com/SSS_GOV/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.facebook.com/SSSregistration/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.facebook.com/SSSregistration?ref=ts&fref=ts/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.sss.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.youtube.com/user/SelectiveServ/videos

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.youtube.com/user/SelectiveServ?feature=watch/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

Page 1 of 1  (7 Total Results)

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Winslow Dalrymple, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Otsego County Court, which denied, without a hearing, a motion by defendant in the nature of a writ of error *coram nobis*for an order vacating a judgment of conviction. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present—Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 166 (Wednesday, August 27, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 51150]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-20378]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9915-95-OEI]

Agency Information Collection Activities OMB Responses

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) responses to Agency Clearance requests, in compliance with the 
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). An agency may not 
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a 
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB 
control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA regulations are listed 
in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Courtney Kerwin (202) 566-1669, or 
email at kerwin.courtney@epa.gov and please refer to the appropriate 
EPA Information Collection Request (ICR) Number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

OMB Responses to Agency Clearance Requests

OMB Approvals

    EPA ICR Number 2409.02; Production Outlook Reports for Un-
Registered Renewable Fuel Producers (Renewal); was approved on 07/01/
2014; OMB Number 2060-0660; expires on 07/31/2017; Approved with 
change.
    EPA ICR Number 1904.08; The Sun Wise School Program; was approved 
on 07/01/2014; OMB Number 2060-0439; expires on 07/31/2017; Approved 
without change.
    EPA ICR Number 0616.11; Compliance Requirement for Child Resistant 
Packaging (Renewal); 40 CFR part 157; was approved on 07/14/2014; OMB 
Number 2070-0052; expires on 07/31/2017; Approved without change.
    EPA ICR Number 2265.02; SmartWay Transport Partnership (Renewal); 
was approved on 07/18/2014; OMB Number 2060-0663; expires on 07/31/
2017; Approved with change.
    EPA ICR Number 2169.05; Cooling Water Intake Structures at Phase 
III Facilities (Renewal); 40 CFR part 125; was approved on 07/18/2014; 
OMB Number 2040-0268; expires on 07/31/2017; Approved without change.
    EPA ICR Number 1360.14; Underground Storage Tanks: Technical and 
Financial Requirements, and State Program Approval Procedures; 40 CFR 
parts 280 and 281; was approved on 07/23/2014; OMB Number 2050-0068; 
expires on 09/30/2014; Approved without change.

Spencer Clark,
Acting Director, Collections Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2014-20378 Filed 8-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
November 6, 2002


Mr. Curt Phillips
AFC
310 East 96th Street
Suite 300
Indianapolis, IN  46240

RE:  Ugly Duckling  Corporation / Automotive  Finance  Inventory  Line, Loan and
     Security Agreement dated as of August 24, 2001


Dear Sir:

In the quarter and month ending September 2002 and the month ending October 2002
we breached the Debt to Tangible Net Worth covenant of the Duck Auto Owner Trust
2002-B, resulting in an event of default under such trust. In turn, this default
caused an event of default under the above  referenced  agreement  under Article
VIII (C) Events of Default.

The breach of the  covenant in the Duck Auto Owner Trust  2002-B was a result of
an  error in the  determination  of the  covenant  test in the  drafting  of the
related deal  documentation.  The insurer,  XL Capital,  has agreed the covenant
test was set in error and has agreed to waive the covenant until the test can be
amended in the related deal documentation.

With this letter DriveTime  Automotive Group, Inc. requests  Automotive  Finance
Corporation to waive the event of default under their agreement triggered by the
breaches  in the Duck  Auto  Owner  Trust  2002-B  Debt to  Tangible  Net  Worth
covenant.  If you need any  additional  information  to evaluate  this  request,
please contact me at 602-852-6635.  Your prompt attention to this matter will be
appreciated.

Sincerely,



Bob Fulton
Vice President - Treasurer
DriveTime Automotive Group, Inc.

cc:      Jon D. Ehlinger, Esq.

The undersigned hereby waives the covenants requested:

Automotive Finance Corporation

By:      _________________________
Name:    _________________________
Title:   _________________________
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7220
BART FITZGERALD MCCLAIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAY CARTER, Lieutenant; BRUCE C. CARPENTER, Correctional Officer; CODY BLAKE STEWART, Correctional Officer; OFFICER EDWARDS; OFFICER FOX, Defendants - Appellee, and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Avery-Mitchell Facility, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-20-1-MU) Submitted: December 16, 2004 Decided: December 21, 2004 Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.- 2 - Bart Fitzgerald McClain, Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, Roy Asberry Cooper, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Bart Fitzgerald McClain appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel and his motion for leave to file a supplemental complaint, and dismissing McClain’s civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. SeeMcClain v. Carter , No. CA-01-20-1-MU (W.D.N.C. July 15, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 550.198 [Reserved]
#### Marshall Field & Company, appellant, v. Louis E. Winick, appellee.

Gen. No. 28,463.

Trover for $1,000 for sheeting lost by plaintiff and found by defendant, and charge of conversion. Defendant found guilty and damages assessed. Petition to vacate judgment and for new trial granted. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Wells M. Cook, Judge, presiding. Heard in the. second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1923.

Reversed.

Opinion filed October 2, 1923.

Frank P. Leffingwell, for appellant. Gesas, Epstein & Leonard, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court,
#### § 56.13017 Compressor discharge pipes.

Compressor discharge pipes where carbon build-up may occur shall be cleaned periodically as recommended by the manufacturer, but no less frequently than once every two years.
#### § 904.108 Break-even amount.

(a) *Definition.* The term “break-even amount” as used herein means the minimum average monthly amount required to provide funds for the items listed in the illustration below. A separate break-even amount shall be established for each size and type of dwelling unit, as well as for the Project as a whole. The break-even amount for EHPA and NRMR will vary by size and type of dwelling unit; similar variations as to other line items may be made if the LHA deems this equitable.

# Illustration.

The following is an illustration of the computation of the break-even amount based upon hypothetical amounts.

| (1) Operating Expense (see § 904.109): | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Administration | $8.50 | |
| Homebuyer services | 2.00 | |
| Project supplied utilities | 3.00 | |
| Routine maintenance—common property | 3.00 | |
| Protective services | 2.00 | |
| General expense | 6.50 | |
| Nonroutine maintenance—common property (Contribution to operating reserve) | 2.00 | $27.00 |
| (2) Earned Home Payments Account (see § 904.110) | | 12.00 |
| (3) Nonroutine Maintenance Reserve (see § 904.111) | | 7.50 |
| Break-Even Amount | | 46.50 |

The break-even amount does not include the monthly allowance for utilities which the homebuyer pays for directly, nor does it include any amount for debt service on the Project notes.

(b) *Excess over break-even.* When the homebuyer's required monthly payment (see § 904.107(j)) exceeds the applicable break-even amount, the excess shall constitute additional Project income and shall be deposited and used in the same manner as other Project income.

(c) *Deficit in monthly payment.* When the homebuyer's required monthly payment is less than the applicable break-even amount, the deficit shall be applied as a reduction of that portion of the monthly payment designated for operating expense (i. e., as a reduction of Project income). In all such cases, the EHPA and the NRMR shall be credited with the amount included in the break-even amount for these accounts.
#### Erie County Board of Social Welfare, Respondent, v. David Donnelly, Appellant.

Permission granted to appeal on one typewritten copy of transcript and five typewritten copies of brief. Appeal dismissed unless appellant’s record and briefs are filed on or before September 29, 1960. Respondent must file brief on or before October 6, 1960 if appeal is to be argued at October 1960 Term.