alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CLEARPOINT BUSINESS RESOURCES, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of ClearPoint Business Resources, Inc. (the
Company) does hereby certify with respect to this Form 10-K/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 29, 2008
|                     | 
|By:                  |  | /s/    KURT A.
BRAUN   
|                     |  | Kurt A. Braun          
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
### "BobVantuyl" To Laurel Dygowski/P2/R8/USEPAlUS@EPA <bob.vantuyl@ashgrove.com
> 

### cc "DickJohnson" <dick.johnson@ashgrove.com>, "Joe Scheeler" <joe.scheeler@ashgrove.com>, "Jan Darling" 

### 12/17/200801 :30 PM <jan.darling@ashgrove.com>, "Curtis Lesslie" bcc Subject Montana City BART: CostAnalysis for Ash Grove SNCR



### LaurelAs you requested, pleasefind the cost effectiveness estimatefor SNCRAsh Grove Montana City plant. Should you require additional information, please contact us. 

# Robert V. VantuylJr. Corporate EnvironmentalManager Ash Grove CementCompany 11011 Cody OverlandPark, KS 66210 913-319-6063

----- Forwarded by Kasi DubbsfTrinity Consultants on 

### 11/25/2008 12:03 PM

----­
From: Dygowski.Laurel@epamail.epa.gov


### To: KDubbs@trinityconsultants.com Date: 

### 11/19/2008 02:15 PM Cost Analysisfor Ash GroveForour Subject:



## Kasi

­
We are in the middle of internal discussions on the BART analysis for Montana. In order to have a complete technical justification for control measures, we need to have a cost analysis from all the sources. We did not get a cost analysis for the NOx controls (LNB/SNCR) for Ash Grove because the most stringent control option was selected. We are requesting a cost analysis for Ash Grove for the NOx controls. Please let me know if you have any questions.



## **** Note

- New Mailing Address
Laurel Dygowski Regional Haze Coordinator Air Quality Planning Unit US EPA

- Region 8 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, CO 80202-1129 303-312-6144

## Ash Grove CementCompany-Montana City Montana SNCR Cost Effectiveness Estimate 12/5/08 SNCR 35%,1:1 molar ratio
CAPITAL COST DirectCapital Cost(DCC) Mixing Air 80,000 SS Piping and Other 15,000 Rotary Union 5,000 Pumps, Controls, Instrumentation 15,000 CEM(NH3 Emissions) 75,000 

### I Receiving Tank 150,000 Day Tank 50,000 Piping, Controls, Instrumentation 40,000 Electrical/MCC Equipment 20,000 H&S (Scrubber) 15,000 Total Purchased EquipmentCost(PEC): 465,000 Salestax &freight (8% of PEG) 37,200 ACT Direct Installation 175,000 Total DCC: 677,200 IndirectCapital Cost(ICC) Engineering, supervision 25,000 Training 15,000 Construction & Field Expense (10% of DCC) 67,720 ACT Contractor Fees (7% of DCC) 47,404 ACT Contingencies (20% ofPEC) 93,000 ACT Total ICC: 248,124 Total Capital Cost 925,324 DCC+ ICC Capital Recovery Factor (7%, 15 yrs) 10.98% ACT Total Annualized Capital Cost 101,601 OPERATING COST DirectOperating Cost (DOC) Operating labor 30,000 1/2 man-year @ $60,000/year Supervision (@ 15% ofoperating labor) 4,500 ACT Maintenance labor 32,500 1/2 man-year @ $65,000/year Maintenance materials (100% maint labor) 32,500 ACT Urea Reagent 1,796,699 Total DOC: 1,896,199 IndirectOperating Cost(IOC) Payroll Overhead (60% oper. Labor & sup, maint labor

### &materials) 59,700 ACT Property tax (1%TCG) 9,253 ACT Insurance (1% TCG) 9,253 ACT Administration (2% TCG) 18,506 ACT TotaIIOC: 96,713 Total Annual Operating Cost 1,992,912

I TOTALCOST Total Annual Cost (Capital 

### &Operating) 2,094,513 Base NOx Emissions (tons/yr) 1,891 NOx Emissions with SNCR (tons/yr) 1,229 Total NOx Removed (tons/year) 662 Total Cost/ton NOx Removed 3,164 NOx Removal Rate 35%
#### § 56.19095 Location of signal devices.

Hoisting signal devices shall be positioned within easy reach of persons on the shaft bottom or constantly attended by a person stationed on the lower deck of the sinking platform.
§ 47.32 HazCom program contents. The HazCom program must include the following: ( a ) How this part is put into practice at the mine through the use of— ( 1 ) Hazard determination,
( 2 ) Labels and other forms of warning,
( 3 ) Material safety data sheets (MSDSs), and
( 4 ) Miner training.
( b ) A list or other record identifying all hazardous chemicals known to be at the mine. The list must— ( 1 ) Use a chemical identity that permits cross-referencing between the list, a chemical's label, and its MSDS; and
( 2 ) Be compiled for the whole mine or by individual work areas.
( c ) At mines with more than one operator, the methods for— ( 1 ) Providing other operators with access to MSDSs, and
( 2 ) Informing other operators about— ( i ) Hazardous chemicals to which their miners can be exposed,
( ii ) The labeling system on the containers of these chemicals, and
( iii ) Appropriate protective measures.
[67 FR 42383, June 21, 2002; 67 FR 57635, Sept. 11, 2002]
§ 551.4 Types of G&G activities that require permits or Notices. ( a ) *Exploration.* You must have a BOEM-approved permit to conduct G&G exploration, including deep stratigraphic tests, for oil, gas, or sulphur resources. If you conduct both geological and geophysical exploration, you must have a separate permit for each.
( b ) *Scientific research.* You may only conduct G&G scientific research related to oil, gas, and sulphur in the OCS after you obtain a BOEM-approved permit or file a Notice. ( 1 ) *Permit.* You must obtain a permit if the research activities you propose to conduct involve: ( i ) Using solid or liquid explosives;
( ii ) Drilling a deep stratigraphic test; or
( iii ) Developing data and information for proprietary use or sale.
( 2 ) *Notice.* Any other G&G scientific research that you conduct related to oil, gas, and sulphur in the OCS requires you to file a Notice with the Regional Director at least 30 days before you begin. If circumstances preclude a 30-day Notice, you must provide oral notification and followup in writing. You must also inform BOEM in writing when you conclude your work.
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MAI SystemsCorporation (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,William B. Kretzmer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuantto 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that :

 

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: September 21, 2005 | By:    | /s/ William  B. Kretzmer |
|-------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|                          |   | William B.  Kretzmer     |
|                          |   | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
No. 98-41185 

-1-

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-41185

Summary Calendar

 

DAVID RAY LEVERTON ET AL.,

 Plaintiffs,

DAVID RAY LEVERTON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TIMOTHY WEST, Etc.; ET AL.,

 Defendants,

TIMOTHY WEST, Warden; TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF

CRIMINAL JUSTICE - INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION;

ROBERT MORIN, Major; HAROLD HASTY, Food Manager;

CLINT GILBERT, Sergeant; JIMMY BINGHAM, Sergeant;

DENISE MELANCON, Sergeant,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:95-CV-448

--------------------

March 24, 2000

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

David Ray Leverton, Texas state prisoner # 373652, appeals

the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint as
No. 98-41185 

-2-

 

** Spears v. McCotter, 766 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1985). 

frivolous. Leverton argues that the district court erred in

dismissing his civil rights claims without conducting a Spears**

hearing. He also argues that the district court abused its

discretion in denying his motions for appointment of counsel, for

class action certification, and to file a supplemental complaint. 

Leverton has shown no error in the district court’s

dismissal of his claims without conducting a Spears hearing

because Leverton developed his claims in the district court in

his amended complaints. See Eason v. Thaler, 14 F.3d 8, 9-10

(5th Cir. 1994). The district court did not abuse its discretion

in denying Leverton’s motion for the appointment of counsel. See

Ulmer v. Chancellor, 691 F.2d 209, 212-13 (5th Cir. 1992). The

district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Leverton’s

motion for class action certification. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 23;

Lightbourn v. County of El Paso, Tex., 118 F.3d 421, 425-26 & n.4

(5th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1052 (1998). The

district court also did not abuse its discretion in denying

Leverton’s motion for leave to file a supplemental complaint. 

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(d); Lewis v. Knutson, 699 F.2d 230, 239

(5th Cir. 1983).

AFFIRMED.
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.505 Subsea completions.

No subsea well completion shall be commenced until the lessee obtains written approval from the District Manager in accordance with § 250.513 of this part. That approval shall be based upon a case-by-case determination that the proposed equipment and procedures will adequately control the well and permit safe production operations.
Exhibit
31.2




Certification
of Chief Financial Officer
 Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 I, Joseph W. Baty, certify
that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q of Schiff Nutrition International, Inc.;
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 
 4.  The registrant’s other certifying
officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;
 
 (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 
 (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in
the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting; and
 
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying
officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
 
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 
 (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
 Date:October 8,
    2008
              By:
              /s/
      Joseph W. BatyJoseph W.
    BatyChief Financial
      Officer
§ 47.55 Retaining an MSDS. The operator must— ( a ) Retain its MSDS for as long as the hazardous chemical is known to be at the mine, and
( b ) Notify miners at least 3 months before disposing of the MSDS.
### §7105. Oaths

An applicant for a license or certificate of registry shall take, before the issuance of the license or certificate, an oath, without concealment or reservation, that the applicant will perform faithfully and honestly, according to the best skill and judgment of the applicant, all the duties required by law.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 540; Pub. L. 111–281, title VI, §613, Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 2970.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 7105 | 46:229e46:23146:244 |

46:231

46:244

Section 7105 requires all individuals who wish to be issued a license or certificate of registry to take an oath before a government official that they will perform all the duties required by law according to their best skill and judgment.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–281 struck out "before a designated official" after "an oath".
### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

# RECEIVED JAN 1 32017 

## HEARING DOCKET In

### the Matter of: William A. 

### Curtright DocketNo. FAA-2015-1319 FAA Case No. 2014NM090046 Judge J. E. Sullivan

COMPLAINANT'S REQUEST TO CHANGE THE TIME OF THENEXT SCHEDULED PREHEARINGCONFERENCECALL


### Comes now undersigned counsel for Complainant and herebymoves to reschedule the Prehearing Phone Conference currently scheduled for January 25, 2017 at 10:30 AM PST. The
reasons are as follows: 1. I have a sister who recently became severely disabled and is in 

### the process of transitioning into an assisted care facility in Orange County, California. 2. Mypresence in 

### Orange County is required the first part ofthe week ofJanuary 23, 2017, for various issues related to her care. 3. I was not aware ofmy need to be engaged as described above during the previous telephonic conference. 4. I booked a non-refundable flight that is scheduledto depart on January 25, 2017, at 8:35AM and arrive in Seattle at 11:21 AM (2:21PM EST). 5. Assuming no airline schedule disruptions or other mishap I should be available to participate in a conference anytime after 12:00 PMPST (3:00PM EST).Consequently, I respectfullyrequestthatthe conference be delay for at least an hour and a half. Ifthat is not possible, then I request itbe rescheduled. It canbe movedup to earlier date if thatis more convenient.
Respectfully submittedthis 9th day ofJanuary 2017.

I 

### MVID F. SHAYNE FAAAttorney

DAVIDF. SHAYNE, FAA ATTORNEY TEL: (425) 227-2165; FAX: (425) 227-1007

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certifY thatthe foregoing Complainant's Request to Change the Time ofthe Next Scheduled Prehearing Conference Call has been served as designated by the recipient this date, to the following: Judge J.E. Sullivan (Facsimile and Certified Mail-RRR) U.S. Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Ave., S.E. (E11-310) Washington, D.C. 20590 Fax: (202) 366-7536 Federal Aviation Administration (Facsimile and Certified Mail-RRR) 800 IndependenceAvenue SW Washington, D.C. 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1000 Fax: (202) 267-1293 William 

### A. Curtright (Facsimile, email, Certified Mail-RRR) P.O. Box 1350 Jefferson, OR 97352 Fax: (503) 485-0812 Email: ames@amesresearch.com Dated this 9th day ofJanuary 2017.

DAVIDF. SHAYNE, F AAATTORNEY TEL: (425) 227·2165; FAX: (425) 227-1007
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ultra Petroleum Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, F. Fox
Benton III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:


(1)    The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.




Date:  November 12, 2003                 By:
       -----------------                     ----------------------------------
                                             F. Fox Benton
                                             Chief Financial Officer

This certification is being furnished solely for purposes of compliance with 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the
liabilities of that Section. Registration Statements or other documents filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission shall not incorporate this exhibit
by reference, except as otherwise expressly stated in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Ultra Petroleum Corp. and will be retained by Ultra Petroleum Corp.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------



                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                    CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2004-J6
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-J6


      The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

      (i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
      preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer
      under the Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

      (ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master
      Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
      throughout such year.




/s/ Joseph M. Candelario                     Dated: March 28, 2005
------------------------

JOSEPH M. CANDELARIO
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Mark Wong                                Dated: March 28, 2005
-------------

MARK WONG
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
### §20116. Rulemaking process

No rule or order issued by the Secretary under this part shall be effective if it incorporates by reference a code, rule, standard, requirement, or practice issued by an association or other entity that is not an agency of the Federal Government, unless—

(1) the date on which the code, rule, standard, requirement, or practice was adopted is specifically cited in the rule or order; or

(2) the code, rule, standard, requirement, or practice has been subject to notice and comment under a rule or order issued under this part.

(Added Pub. L. 110–432, div. A, title I, §107(a), Oct. 16, 2008, 122 Stat. 4859; amended Pub. L. 114–94, div. A, title XI, §11316(c), Dec. 4, 2015, 129 Stat. 1676.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 20116, Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 871; amended Pub. L. 103–440, title II, §206(a), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4620, related to biennial safety reports prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–66, title I, §1121(g)(1), Dec. 21, 1995, 109 Stat. 724.

#### Amendments

2015—Pub. L. 114–94 substituted "unless—" for "unless", inserted par. (1) designation before "the date", substituted "order; or" for "order, or" in par. (1), inserted par. (2) designation before "the code, rule, standard, requirement, or practice has been subject to notice and comment under a rule or order issued under this part.", and realigned margins.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2015 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–94 effective Oct. 1, 2015, see section 1003 of Pub. L. 114–94, set out as a note under section 5313 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.