alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[114th Congress Public Law 297]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 130 STAT. 1510]]

Public Law 114-297
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  14231 TX-150 in Coldspring, Texas, as the ``E. Marie Youngblood Post 
            Office''. <<NOTE: Dec. 16, 2016 -  [H.R. 5356]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. E. MARIE YOUNGBLOOD POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 14231 TX-150 in Coldspring, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``E. Marie Youngblood Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``E. Marie 
Youngblood Post Office''.

    Approved December 16, 2016.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5356:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016):
            Sept. 20, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 5, considered and passed Senate; passage vitiated.
            Dec. 9, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
§ 282.6 Disclosure of data and information to an adjacent State. ( a ) Proprietary data, information, and samples submitted to BSEE pursuant to the requirements of this part shall be made available for inspection by representatives of adjacent State(s) upon request by the Governor(s) in accordance with paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( b ) Disclosure shall occur only after the Governor has entered into an agreement with the Secretary providing that: ( 1 ) The confidentiality of the information shall be maintained;
( 2 ) In any action commenced against the Federal Government or the State for failure to protect the confidentiality of proprietary information, the Federal Government or the State, as the case may be, may not raise as a defense any claim of sovereign immunity or any claim that the employee who revealed the proprietary information, which is the basis of the suit, was acting outside the scope of the person's employment in revealing the information;
( 3 ) The State agrees to hold the United States harmless for any violation by the State or its employees or contractors of the agreement to protect the confidentiality of proprietary data, information, and samples; and
( c ) The data, information, and samples available for inspection by representatives of adjacent State(s) pursuant to an agreement shall be related to leased lands.
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION**




I,
      Steven
      Walin, Chief Executive Officer of GVI Security Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”),
      hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(i)
      The
      Company’s accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended
      September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(ii)
      The
      information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                  Steven WalinSteven
                  WalinChief
                  Executive OfficerDated:
                  November 8, 2007




1
### §31146. Relationship to other laws

Except as provided in section 31136(b) of this title, this subchapter and the regulations prescribed under this subchapter do not affect chapter 51 of this title or a regulation prescribed under chapter 51.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1013.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 31146 | 49 App.:2518. | Oct. 30, 1984, Pub. L. 98–554, §221, 98 Stat. 2846. |

Section
**CERTIFICATION
          PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTIONS
          906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 **(18
          U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**
 
 In
          connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Radale Imports, Inc.
          (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the
“Report”), I, Ken Swanson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
          certify that to my knowledge:
 
 (1)  The
          Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and
 
 (2)  The
          information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and results of operations of the
          Company.
 Date
                November 13, 2007
              By:
              */s/
                Ken Swanson*Ken
                SwansonChief
                Financial Officer
 
 The
        above
        certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
        or as a separate disclosure document.
 Exhibit
          32.1
### Part A—Approval and Implementation of Original Compact
### §1423b. Selection and qualification of members; officers; rules and regulations; quorum

The legislature shall be the judge of the selection and qualification of its own members. It shall choose from its members its own officers, determine its rules and procedure, not inconsistent with this chapter, and keep a journal. The quorum of the legislature shall consist of a simple majority of its members. No bill shall become a law unless it shall have been passed at a meeting, at which a quorum was present, by the affirmative vote of a majority of the members present and voting, which vote shall be by yeas and nays.

(Aug. 1, 1950, ch. 512, §12, 64 Stat. 388; Pub. L. 90–497, §6(b), Sept. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 846; Pub. L. 105–291, §3, Oct. 27, 1998, 112 Stat. 2785.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Pub. L. 105–291 substituted "a simple majority" for "eleven".

1968—Pub. L. 90–497 inserted a quorum requirement, provided that a quorum of the legislature consist of eleven of its members, and made presence of a quorum requisite to passage of a law.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1968 Amendment

Pub. L. 90–497, §6(b), Sept. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 846, provided that the amendment made by that section is effective on date of enactment of Pub. L. 90–497, which was approved Sept. 11, 1968.
#### § 1227.109 What if the ONRR Director denies a State's delegation proposal?

If the ONRR Director denies your delegation proposal, ONRR will state the reasons for denial. ONRR also will inform you in writing of the conditions you must meet to receive approval. You may submit a new delegation proposal at any time following a denial.

[62 FR 43084, Aug. 12, 1997, as amended at 75 FR 61087, Oct. 4, 2010]
#### § 1217.50 Audits of records.

The Secretary, or his/her authorized representative, shall initiate and conduct audits relating to the scope, nature and extent of compliance by lessees, operators, revenue payors, and other persons with rental, royalty, net profit share and other payment requirements on a Federal or Indian oil and gas lease. Audits also will relate to compliance with applicable regulations and orders. All audits will be conducted in accordance with the notice and other requirements of 30 U.S.C. 1717.
EXHIBIT 32.3


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SATBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


I, Sam Friedland, as President and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Odd Job Stores,
Inc. (the "Company"), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

           (1) The accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending September
           30, 2003 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
           (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
           or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.




Date: November 14, 2003            By: /s/ Sam Friedland
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Sam Friedland
                                       President and Co-Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 21.1

<TABLE>
                                                   SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<CAPTION>
                                                     Jurisdiction of
                     Entity                            Organization           Name Under Which Subsidiary Does Business
--------------------------------------------------- ------------------- ----------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                      <C>            <C>
Alaska United Fiber System Partnership                    Alaska        Alaska United Fiber System Partnership, Alaska
                                                                        United Fiber System, Alaska United

Fiber Hold Co., Inc.                                      Alaska        Fiber Hold Co., Inc., Fiber Hold Company

GCI Communication Corp.                                   Alaska        GCI, GCC, GCICC, GCI Communication Corp.

GCI, Inc.                                                 Alaska        GCI, GCI, Inc.

GCI Cable, Inc.                                           Alaska        GCI Cable, GCI Cable, Inc.

GCI Fiber Co., Inc.                                       Alaska        GCI Fiber Co., Inc., GCI Fiber Company

GCI Holdings, Inc.                                        Alaska        GCI Holdings, Inc.

GCI Satellite Co., Inc.                                   Alaska        GCI Satellite Co., Inc., GCI Satellite Company

GCI Transport Co., Inc.                                   Alaska        GCI Transport Co., Inc., GCI Transport Company

Potter View Development Co., Inc.                         Alaska        Potter View Development Co., Inc.

GCI Cablesystems of Alaska, Inc.                          Alaska        GCI Cablesystems of Alaska, Inc., Rogers Cable

GCI American Cablesystems, Inc.                          Delaware       GCI American Cablesystems, Inc.

GCI Fiber Communication, Co., Inc.                        Alaska        GCI Fiber Communication, Co., Inc., GFCC,  Kanas
</TABLE>
**NAVISTAR        RECEIVES $1.5 BILLION LOAN COMMITMENT**

***Company        disputes additional default notices but may use loan commitment to refinance        notes***

----

**Forward        Looking Statements**

*Information        provided and statements made that are not purely historical are forward -looking        statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act, Section        21E        of the Exchange Act, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of        1995.        Such forward-looking statements only speak as of the date of this report        and we        assume no obligation to update the information included in this report, whether        as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Such forward-looking        statements include information concerning our possible or assumed future        results        of operations, including descriptions of our business strategy. These statements        often include words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,”“estimate” or similar expressions. These statements are not guarantees of        performance or results and they involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions,        including the risk of continued delay in the completion of our financial        statements and the consequences thereof, the availability of funds, either        through cash on hand or the company’s other liquidity sources, to repay any        amounts due should any of the notes become accelerated, and decisions by        suppliers and other vendors to restrict or eliminate customary trade and        other        credit terms for the company’s future orders and other services, which would        require the company to pay cash and which could have a material adverse effect        on the company’s liquidity position and financial condition. Although we        believe that these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable        assumptions, there are many other factors that could cause actual results        to        differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements.  For a        further description of these and other factors, see Exhibit 99.1 to our Form        10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2004.*
* Pursuant to 5TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 19, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40371 Summary Calendar

DANIEL RAYHAAN ALI, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus DOUG DRETKE; ARTHUR VELASQUEZ; RORY KNOTT; WILLIAM DUGGER, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:05-CV-298

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Daniel Rayhaan Ali, Texas prisoner # 1077766, appeals the district court’s dismissal as frivolous of his in forma pauperis 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Ali asserts that he was improperly convicted of a disciplinary charge for refusing to shave his beard, in light of a medical pass and his sincerely held religious beliefs. He maintains that the disciplinary conviction violated the First Amendment and various federal and state
statutes.No. 06-40371 -2- Because Ali’s challenge calls into question the validity of his disciplinary conviction, and because Ali lost good-time credits as a result of that conviction, his challenges are barred because he has not shown that the disciplinary conviction has been overturned. See Edwards v. Balisok , 520 U.S. 641, 648-49 (1997); cf. Muhammad v. Close , 540 U.S. 749, 751-55 (2004). To the extent that the loss of privileges does not call into question the duration of Ali’s confinement, he cannot establish that he is entitled to relief on the merits of his allegations.
See Hicks v. Garner , 69 F.3d 22, 25 (5th Cir. 1995); Hernandez v. Estelle , 788 F.2d 1154, 1158 (5th Cir. 1986). Ali has not established that the district court abused its discretion by dismissing his civil rights action as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). See Berry v. Brady , 192 F.3d 504, 507 (5th Cir. 1999). As a result, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. The district court’s dismissal of Ali’s complaint as frivolous counts as one strike under § 1915(g). Adepegba v.
Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387 (5th Cir. 1996). Ali is cautioned that if he accumulates three strikes, he may no longer proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g). AFFIRMED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
§ 92.258 Elder cottage housing opportunity (ECHO) units. ( a ) *General.* HOME funds may be used for the initial purchase and initial placement costs of elder cottage housing opportunity (ECHO) units that meet the requirements of this section, and that are small, free-standing, barrier-free, energy-efficient, removable, and designed to be installed adjacent to existing single-family dwellings.
( b ) *Eligible owners.* The owner of a HOME-assisted ECHO unit may be: ( 1 ) The owner-occupant of the single-family host property on which the ECHO unit will be located;
( 2 ) A participating jurisdiction; or
( 3 ) A non-profit organization.
( c ) *Eligible tenants.* During the affordability period, the tenant of a HOME-assisted ECHO unit must be an elderly or disabled family as defined in 24 CFR 5.403 and must also be a low-income family.
( d ) *Applicable requirements.* The requirements of § 92.252 apply to HOME-assisted ECHO units, with the following modifications: ( 1 ) Only one ECHO unit may be provided per host property.
( 2 ) The ECHO unit owner may choose whether or not to charge the tenant of the ECHO unit rent, but if a rent is charged, it must meet the requirements of § 92.252.
( 3 ) The ECHO housing must remain affordable for the period specified in § 92.252(e). If within the affordability period the original occupant no longer occupies the unit, the ECHO unit owner must: ( i ) Rent the unit to another eligible occupant on site;
( ii ) Move the ECHO unit to another site for occupancy by an eligible occupant; or
( iii ) If the owner of the ECHO unit is the host property owner-occupant, the owner may repay the HOME funds in accordance with the recapture provisions imposed by the participating jurisdiction consistent with § 92.254(a)(5)(ii). The participating jurisdiction must use the recaptured HOME funds for additional HOME activities.
( 4 ) The participating jurisdiction has the responsibility to enforce the project requirements applicable to ECHO units.
**Exhibit
      32.2**










**Certification
      Pursuant to**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350**


**As
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**










In
      connection with the Annual Report of Capital Resource Funding, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David
      R. Koran, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
      based on my knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








July
      14,
      2006





CAPITAL
      RESOURCE FUNDING, INC.








/s/
      David R. Koran________________


David
      R.
      Koran, Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 11
                             GUITAR CENTER, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                        (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE)


                                                    Quarter ended
                                                       March 31,
                                             ----------------------------
                                                1997              1996
                                             ----------        ----------

Net income (loss)                            $    926          $   3,738

Weighted average shares outstanding            19,330             19,330
Common stock equivalents                        1,090              1,090
                                             ----------        ----------

Weighted average shares outstanding            20,420             20,420
                                             ----------        ----------
                                             ----------        ----------

Income (loss) per share                      $   0.05          $    0.18
                                             ----------        ----------
                                             ----------        ----------
§ 36.43 Determination of exhaust-gas composition. ( a ) Samples shall be taken to determine the composition of the exhaust gas while the engine is operated at loads and speeds prescribed by MSHA to determine the volume of air (ventilation) required to dilute the exhaust gas (see § 36.45). The engine shall be at temperature equilibrium before exhaust-gas samples are collected or other test data are observed. At all test conditions the intake mixture shall contain 1.5 ±0.1 percent, by volume, of Pittsburgh natural gas (see footnote 3) in the air. Test observations shall include the rate of fuel consumption, pressures, temperatures, and other data significant in the safe operation of diesel equipment.
( b ) Exhaust-gas samples shall be analyzed for carbon dioxide, oxygen, carbon monoxide, hydrogen, methane, nitrogen, oxides of nitrogen, and aldehydes, or any other constituent prescribed by MSHA.
( c ) The intake and exhaust systems shall be complete with all component equipment such as air cleaners, flame arresters, and exhaust cooling systems. The performance of component equipment shall be observed to determine whether it functions properly.
[Sched. 31, 26 FR 645, Jan. 24, 1961, as amended at 61 FR 55526, Oct. 25, 1996]
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth below is being submitted in
connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a14(b) or Rule 15d14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Ray C. Dillon, the Chief Executive
Officer, and Clefton D. Vaughan, the Chief Financial Officer, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Deltic Timber Corporation.
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/Ray C. Dillon



Ray C. Dillon

Chief Executive Officer

July
30, 2003





/s/Clefton D. Vaughan



Clefton D. Vaugan

Chief
Financial Officer

July 30, 2003