alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.1601 Definitions.

Terms used in this subpart shall have the meanings as defined below:

*Air line* means a tubing string that is used to inject air within a sulphur producing well to airlift sulphur out of the well.

*Bleedwater* means a mixture of mine water or booster water and connate water that is produced by a bleedwell.

*Bleedwell* means a well drilled into a producing sulphur deposit that is used to control the mine pressure generated by the injection of mine water.

*Brine* means the water containing dissolved salt obtained from a brine well by circulating water into and out of a cavity in the salt core of a salt dome.

*Brine well* means a well drilled through cap rock into the core at a salt dome for the purpose of producing brine.

*Cap rock* means the rock formation, a body of limestone, anhydride, and/or gypsum, overlying a salt dome.

*Sulphur deposit* means a formation of rock that contains elemental sulphur.

*Sulphur production rate* means the number of long tons of sulphur produced during a certain period of time, usually per day.
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.1505 Where may I get training for my employees?

You may get training from any source that meets the requirements of your training plan.
### §744. Coasting trade laws

The coasting trade between Puerto Rico and the United States shall be regulated in accordance with the provisions of law applicable to such trade between any two great coasting districts of the United States.

(Apr. 12, 1900, ch. 191, §9, 31 Stat. 79; May 17, 1932, ch. 190, 47 Stat. 158.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Additional provisions of section 9 of act Apr. 12, 1900, authorizing the making of regulations for the nationalization of all vessels owned by inhabitants of Puerto Rico on April 11, 1889, and which continued to be so owned up to the date of that nationalization and for the admission of the same to all the benefits of the coasting trade of the United States, have been omitted.

Section was not enacted as part of the Puerto Rican Federal Relations Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Puerto Rico" substituted in text for "Porto Rico" pursuant to act May 17, 1932, which is classified to section 731a of this title.
### §53208. Regulatory relief

The telecommunications and other electronic equipment on an existing vessel that is redocumented under the laws of the United States for operation under an Operating Agreement under this chapter shall be deemed to satisfy all Federal Communication Commission equipment certification requirements, if—

(1) such equipment complies with all applicable international agreements and associated guidelines as determined by the country in which the vessel was documented immediately before becoming documented under the laws of the United States;

(2) that country has not been identified by the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating as inadequately enforcing international regulations as to that vessel; and

(3) at the end of its useful life, such equipment shall be replaced with equipment that meets Federal Communication Commission equipment certification standards.

(Added Pub. L. 116–92, div. C, title XXXV, §3521(a), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1997.)
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 238 (Thursday, December 10, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 79502-79503]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27174]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4559-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2020-0001]


Louisiana; Amendment No. 14 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-4559-DR), dated August 28, 2020, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued November 20, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Louisiana is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of August 28, 2020.

    Avoyelles, Caldwell, and DeSoto Parishes for debris removal 
[Category A] (already designated for emergency protective measures 
[Category B], including direct federal assistance, under the Public 
Assistance program).
    Catahoula Parish for permanent work [Categories C-G] (already 
designated for debris removal and emergency protective measures 
[Categories A and B], including direct federal assistance, under the 
Public Assistance program).
    Iberia Parish for debris removal [Category A] and permanent work 
[Categories C-G] (already designated for emergency protective 
measures [Category B], including direct federal assistance, under 
the Public Assistance program).

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance

[[Page 79503]]

(Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation 
Grant.

Pete Gaynor,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2020-27174 Filed 12-9-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the report) for the purpose of complying with
Rule 13a14(b) or Rule 15d14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Ray C. Dillon, the President and Chief Executive Officer, and Kenneth D. Mann, the Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, each certifies that, to the
best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Deltic Timber Corporation.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Ray C. DillonRay C. DillonPresident and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 7, 2007/s/ Kenneth D. MannKenneth D. MannVice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 7, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      16,434,972
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,689,092
<ALLOWANCES>                                   380,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,860,652
<PP&E>                                      16,189,134
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,152,292
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              59,684,301
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,289,408
<BONDS>                                        499,755
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    52,727,793
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,254,211)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                59,684,301
<SALES>                                     58,937,146
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            58,937,146
<CGS>                                       33,025,537
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               52,886,163
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               577,982
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             191,845
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,701,140
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,303,157
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,397,983
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,397,983
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.57


</TABLE>
### §31705. Fuel use tax

(a) Reporting Requirements.—After September 30, 1996, a State may establish, maintain, or enforce a law or regulation that has a fuel use tax reporting requirement (including any tax reporting form) only if the requirement conforms with the International Fuel Tax Agreement.

(b) Payment.—After September 30, 1996, a State may establish, maintain, or enforce a law or regulation that provides for the payment of a fuel use tax only if the law or regulation conforms with the International Fuel Tax Agreement as it applies to collection of a fuel use tax by a single base State and proportional sharing of fuel use taxes charged among the States where a commercial motor vehicle is operated.

(c) Limitation.—If the International Fuel Tax Agreement is amended, a State not participating in the Agreement when the amendment is made is not subject to the conformity requirements of subsections (a) and (b) of this section in regard to the amendment until after a reasonable time, but not earlier than the expiration of—

(1) the 365-day period beginning on the first day that States participating in the Agreement are required to comply with the amendment; or

(2) the 365-day period beginning on the day the relevant office of the State receives written notice of the amendment from the Secretary of Transportation.

(d) Nonapplication.—This section does not apply to a State that was participating in the Regional Fuel Tax Agreement on January 1, 1991, and that continues to participate in that Agreement after that date.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1032.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 31705 | 49:11506 (note). | Dec. 18, 1991, Pub. L. 102–240, §4008(g), 105 Stat. 2154. |

Section

In subsection (b), the words "as it applies to" are substituted for "with respect to" for clarity.

In subsection (c), before clause (1), the words "a State not participating in the Agreement when the amendment is made is not subject to the conformity requirements of subsections (a) and (b) of this section in regard to the amendment" are substituted for "conformity by a State that is not participating in such Agreement when such amendment is made may not be required with respect to such amendment" for clarity.
#### HODGES et al., Appellants, v. WALKER, Defendant (CORNELL, Respondent).

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 23, 1903.)

Action by Appolonia Hodges and another against Norman S. Walker, Jr., as trustee, and Margaret J. Cornell.

No opinion. Motion denied.
#### GREISINGER, Appellant, v. STATE, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

January 4, 1905.)

Action by Anna Greisinger against the state of New York. No opinion. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
### §20501. Definition

In this chapter, "signal system" means a block signal system, an interlocking, automatic train stop, train control, or cab-signal device, or a similar appliance, method, device, or system intended to promote safety in railroad operations.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 883.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20501 | (no source). | |

Section

This section is added to eliminate the unnecessary repetition of the words used in the definition. The definition is derived from 49 App.:26(b)–(f).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Signal Protection

Pub. L. 114–94, div. A, title XI, §11408, Dec. 4, 2015, 129 Stat. 1684, provided that:

"(a) In General.—Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 4, 2015], the Secretary [of Transportation] shall initiate a rulemaking to require that on-track safety regulations, whenever practicable and consistent with other safety requirements and operational considerations, include requiring implementation of redundant signal protection for maintenance-of-way work crews who depend on a train dispatcher to provide signal protection.

"(b) Alternative Safety Measures.—The Secretary shall consider exempting from any final requirements of this section each segment of track for which operations are governed by a positive train control system certified under section 20157 of title 49, United States Code, or any other safety technology or practice that would achieve an equivalent or greater level of safety in providing additional signal protection."
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

152 

KA 11-01947 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, AND NEMOYER, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

DEREK GETMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

GENESEE VALLEY LEGAL AID, INC., GENESEO (JEANNIE D. MICHALSKI OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

GREGORY J. MCCAFFREY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, GENESEO (JOSHUA J. TONRA OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Livingston County Court (Dennis S.

Cohen, J.), rendered June 30, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant,

upon his plea of guilty, of attempted promoting a sexual performance

by a child. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Entered: February 3, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
### §1513. No additional funds authorized

No additional funds are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this chapter, or the amendments made by this title.1 This chapter, and the amendments made by this title,1 shall be carried out using amounts otherwise authorized.

(Pub. L. 115–141, div. P, title VI, §623, Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1115.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title VI of div. P of Pub. L. 115–141, Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1097, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title VI to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1501 of this title and Tables.

This title, referred to in text, means title VI of div. P of Pub. L. 115–141. See note above.

1 See References in Text note below.
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.521 When do I have to perform a casing diagnostic test?

(a) You must perform a casing diagnostic test within 30 days after first observing or imposing casing pressure according to the following table:

| If you have a . . . | you must perform a casing diagnostic test if . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (1) fixed platform well, | the casing pressure is greater than 100 psig. |
| (2) subsea well, | the measurable casing pressure is greater than the external hydrostatic pressure plus 100 psig measured at the subsea wellhead. |
| (3) hybrid well, | a riser or the production casing pressure is greater than 100 psig measured at the surface. |

(b) You are exempt from performing a diagnostic pressure test for the production casing on a well operating under active gas lift.

[76 FR 64462, Oct. 18, 2011. Redesignated at 77 FR 50894, Aug. 22, 2012]
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1003 Installation, testing, and repair requirements for DOI pipelines. ( a ) ( 1 ) Pipelines greater than 85 ⁄ 8 inches in diameter and installed in water depths of less than 200 feet shall be buried to a depth of at least 3 feet unless they are located in pipeline congested areas or seismically active areas as determined by the Regional Supervisor. Nevertheless, the Regional Supervisor may require burial of any pipeline if the Regional Supervisor determines that such burial will reduce the likelihood of environmental degradation or that the pipeline may constitute a hazard to trawling operations or other uses. A trawl test or diver survey may be required to determine whether or not pipeline burial is necessary or to determine whether a pipeline has been properly buried.
( 2 ) Pipeline valves, taps, tie-ins, capped lines, and repaired sections that could be obstructive shall be provided with at least 3 feet of cover unless the Regional Supervisor determines that such items present no hazard to trawling or other operations. A protective device may be used to cover an obstruction in lieu of burial if it is approved by the Regional Supervisor prior to installation.
( 3 ) Pipelines shall be installed with a minimum separation of 18 inches at pipeline crossings and from obstructions.
( 4 ) Pipeline risers installed after April 1, 1988, shall be protected from physical damage that could result from contact with floating vessels. Riser protection on pipelines installed on or before April 1, 1988, may be required when the Regional Supervisor determines that significant damage potential exists.
( b ) ( 1 ) Pipelines shall be pressure tested with water at a stabilized pressure of at least 1.25 times the MAOP for at least 8 hours when installed, relocated, uprated, or reactivated after being out-of-service for more than 1 year.
( 2 ) Prior to returning a pipeline to service after a repair, the pipeline shall be pressure tested with water or processed natural gas at a minimum stabilized pressure of at least 1.25 times the MAOP for at least 2 hours.
( 3 ) Pipelines shall not be pressure tested at a pressure which produces a stress in the pipeline in excess of 95 percent of the specified minimum-yield strength of the pipeline. A temperature recorder measuring test fluid temperature synchronized with a pressure recorder along with deadweight test readings shall be employed for all pressure testing. When a pipeline is pressure tested, no observable leakage shall be allowed. Pressure gauges and recorders shall be of sufficient accuracy to verify that leakage is not occurring.
( 4 ) The Regional Supervisor may require pressure testing of pipelines to verify the integrity of the system when the Regional Supervisor determines that there is a reasonable likelihood that the line has been damaged or weakened by external or internal conditions.
( c ) When a pipeline is repaired utilizing a clamp, the clamp shall be a full encirclement clamp able to withstand the anticipated pipeline pressure.
April 4, 2012

Civic Helicopters is requesting an extension of our Drug Testing Program exemption 

required under Sec. 91.147 in that Civic Helicopters already has an approved drug testing 

program under FAR Part 135.

Civic Helicopters, Inc. operate under the certificate DCQA715B, located at 2206 Palomar 

Airport Road, Carlsbad, CA 92011. The complete contact information is at the foot of 

this letter.

Civic Helicopters, Inc. requests an extension of our exemption from Sec. 91.147 of the 

required drug test program.

Civic Helicopter is requesting an extension of complete relief of this 91.147 drug test 

requirement. Civic Helicopters already has a FAA approved drug test program in place 

under Part 135 operation. The pilot is the same pilot who will be performing the service 

under both Part 135 and Sec. 91.147 programs.

Civic Helicopters Inc. is a California registered company holding out to the public as the 

FAA certified nonscheduled public air carrier which will be benefited by not duplicating

the same program twice for the same purpose under the cost reduction act established in 

the company preferred business operation practices.

The granting of extending the drug testing exemption under Sec. 91.147 will not affect 

the safety requirement established by FAA since the same required drug testing program 

has already been implemented by Civic Helicopters under FAR Part 135 program.

In summary, Civic Helicopters received FAA Part 135 certification in 1987 and has been 

operating successfully with the required drug testing program in place without a single 

positive test. Therefore, Civic Helicopters is requesting an extension of the exemption 

under Sec. 91.147 of the drug testing requirement since the same pilot will be operating 

under both programs; a single testing program would in fact satisfy both programs.

Respectfully,

Chin Yi Tu

President

Civic Helicopters, Inc. 

2206 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD, SUITE H, CARLSBA D, CA 92011

TEL 760 - 438 - 8424 FAX 760 - 438 - 0451

WWW.CIVICHELICOPTERS .COM
#### Felix Devlin, Respondent, *v.*Herman Reiners, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.

(Argued November 22, 1881;

decided December 6, 1881.)

Decided on the facts.

*IS. T. Wood*for appellant.

*Wm. N. Dyokmam,*for respondent.

*Per Curiam*

opinion for affirmance.

All concur, except Rapallo, J., absent.

Judgment affirmed.
### Bryophytes associated with mineral deposits and solutions in Alaska

By: Hansford T. Shacklette

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1198C

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.