alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. P E T E RM . G A T L I N , a . k. a . P e t e rG a t l i n, a . k. a . P e t e rM a r s he l l G a t l i n, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 10- 50623 D . C . N o . 2 : 1 0 -cr-0 0 5 3 2 -S JO ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia S . J a m e s O t e r o, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r25, 2011 ** B e f o r e : T R O T T , G O U L D , an dR A W L I N S O N , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . P e te rM . G a tlin ap p e a ls f r o m th e 6 0 - m o n th s e n te n c e im p o s e df o llo w in g h is gui l ty - pl e ac onvi c t i on f orpa s s i ng m a t e r i a l l ya l t e r e d pos t a l m one yor de r s , a nd a id in g a n dab e ttin g , in v io la tio n o f 1 8 U .S .C . § § 5 0 0 , 2 ( a ) , an df o rb e in g af

e lo n in 

# FI LED OC T 28 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 50623 2 p o s s e s s io n o f

af ir e a rm a n da m m u n itio n , in v io la tio n o f 1 8 U .S .C . § 9 2 2 ( g ) . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f i rm. G at l i n con t ends thatthe di stri ctcourtgave un du e w ei gh tt o h i s e xt ended cr i m i nal hi st ory and t o add i t i on alcond uctdesc ribed i n the pres ent ence re po rt (“P S R ”) , an dth at h is se n ten ce is su b stan ti v ely u n re as o n ab le. T h e d istrict co u rt’s c o n s id e r a tio n o f

c o n du c t d e s c r ib e din th e P S R w a s n o t im p r o p e r , se e U ni ted States v . C olum bus , 8 8 1 F .2 d7 8 5 , 7 8 7 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 8 9 ) , an dth e s e n te n c e is r e a s o n ab le in l i ghtof the t ot a l i tyof

the c i r c um s t anc e s a nd the 18 U . S . C . § 3553( a ) s e nt e nc i ng f a c to r s . See G al l

v. U ni ted States , 5 5 2 U .S . 3 8 , 5 1 ( 2 0 0 7 ) ; U ni ted States v. V ale nc i a- B arragan , 60 8 F . 3d 11 03 , 11 08 -09 (9th C i r. 20 10 ). A FFI R M ED .
M. P. No. 77-134.

#### State *v.*Ira Holland.

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, for plaintiff-respondent.

*Ira Holland,*pro se, defendant-petitioner.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus for bail pending appeal is denied. See Rule 9.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Amuso, Appellant.

[835 NYS2d 114]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel E FitzGerald, J.), rendered June 10, 2004, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the first and second degrees, robbery in the first degree, attempted robbery in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of life without parole, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress identification testimony. The lineup photographs reveal that neither lineup was unduly suggestive *(see People v Chipp,*75 NY2d 327, 336 [1990], *cert denied*498 US 833 [1990]). The difference in age between defendant and the fillers, as depicted in the photographs, was not so noticeable as to single defendant out. We note that a disparity between the recorded ages of a defendant and other lineup participants has little relevance unless such disparity is reflected in their physical appearances *(see People v Jackson,*98 NY2d 555, 559 [2002]). Furthermore, since *426the participants were seated, differences in height and weight between defendant and the fillers were not readily apparent. Although at one of the lineups the police, at a witness’s request, directed all the participants to show their teeth, thereby causing defendant to reveal a dental deformity, in the particular circumstances, this had no effect on the identification *(cf. People v LeCorps,*19 AD3d 216 [2005], 5 NY3d 807 [2005]).

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s mistrial motion, made after the People impeached their own witness in violation of CPL 60.35, since the court struck the offending testimony and delivered a curative instruction that was sufficient to prevent any prejudice *(see People v Santiago,*52 NY2d 865 [1981]). With respect to a subsequent portion of the witness’s testimony, defendant’s general objections were insufficient to preserve his present claim that the prosecutor refreshed the witness’s recollection in an improper manner, and we decline to review such claim in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the challenged questioning was permissible *(see*CPL 60.35 [3]).

The People complied with their obligations under *Brady v Maryland*(373 US 83 [1963]), and defendant has not established that he was prejudiced by the timing of the disclosures at issue. Defendant’s Fourth Amendment claim is without merit. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Buckley, Gonzalez and Malone, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the report) for
the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Ray C. Dillon, the Chief Executive Officer, and Kenneth D. Mann, the Chief Financial Officer, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Deltic Timber Corporation.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Ray C. DillonRay C. DillonChief Executive OfficerMay 4, 2011/s/ Kenneth D. MannKenneth D. MannChief Financial OfficerMay 4, 2011
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 200.420 Equal opportunity clause to be included in contracts and subcontracts. ( a ) The equal opportunity clause prescribed by the Commissioner pursuant to the regulations of the Secretary of Labor (41 CFR chapter 60) shall be included in each nonexempt contract and subcontract for work receiving FHA assistance.
( b ) Subcontracts less than $50,000 may incorporate by reference the equal opportunity clause.
( c ) The equal opportunity clause shall be deemed to be a part of each nonexempt contract or subcontract whether or not it is physically incorporated in such contract.
### **CHAPTER 315—MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY**

Sec.
31501.
Definitions.
31502.
Requirements for qualifications, hours of service, safety, and equipment standards.
31503.
Research, investigation, and testing.
31504.
Identification of motor vehicles.

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Chapter 315 is a restatement of existing chapter 31 of title 49, United States Code, that is redesignated as chapter 315 by section 1(c) of the bill.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Simon Property Group, L.P. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|/s/ David SimonDavid Simon
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Simon Property Group, Inc.
General Partner of Simon Property Group, L.P.                                 | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|Date: May 9, 2008                                                                                                                                                        | 
|/s/ Stephen E. SterrettStephen E. Sterrett
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Simon Property Group, Inc.
General Partner of Simon Property Group, L.P. | 
|Date: May 9, 2008                                                                                                                                                        | 

30

---



QuickLinks
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Technical basis andimplementation guidelines for a technique for human event analysis (ATHEANA).[electronic resource].**
 
Report | Appendices
 
SuDoc Number:Y 3.N 88:10/1624/REV. 1
Item Number:1051-H-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000813143
 
August 13, 2019
§ 550.215 What hydrogen sulfide (H2S) information must accompany the EP? The following H2S information, as applicable, must accompany your EP: ( a ) *Concentration.* The estimated concentration of any H2S you might encounter while you conduct your proposed exploration activities.
( b ) *Classification.* Under 30 CFR 250.490(c), a request that the BSEE Regional Supervisor classify the area of your proposed exploration activities as either H2S absent, H2S present, or H2S unknown. Provide sufficient information to justify your request.
( c ) H 2 S Contingency Plan. If you ask the Regional Supervisor to classify the area of your proposed exploration activities as either H2S present or H2S unknown, an H2S Contingency Plan prepared under 30 CFR 250.490(f), or a reference to an approved or submitted H2S Contingency Plan that covers the proposed exploration activities.
( d ) *Modeling report.* If you modeled a potential H2S release when developing your EP, modeling report or the modeling results, or a reference to such report or results if you have already submitted it to the Regional Supervisor. ( 1 ) The analysis in the modeling report must be specific to the particular site of your proposed exploration activities, and must consider any nearby human-occupied OCS facilities, shipping lanes, fishery areas, and other points where humans may be subject to potential exposure from an H2S release from your proposed exploration activities.
( 2 ) If any H2S emissions are projected to affect an onshore location in concentrations greater than 10 parts per million, the modeling analysis must be consistent with the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) risk management plan methodologies outlined in 40 CFR part 68.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3546

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide for public disclosure 

of average manufacturer prices (AMP) and best prices for prescription drugs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2005

Mr. EMANUEL (for himself, Mr. CASE, Mr. LIPINSKI, Ms. HERSETH, and Mr. 

DOGGETT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide 

for public disclosure of average manufacturer prices 

(AMP) and best prices for prescription drugs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prescription Drug 

5 Pricing and Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act of 2005’’. 
2

•HR 3546 IH 

1 SEC. 2. PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF AVERAGE MANUFACTURER 

2 PRICES (AMP) AND BEST PRICES FOR PRE3 SCRIPTION DRUGS. 

4 (a) PUBLIC DISCLOSURE.—Subparagraph (D) of sec5 tion 1927(b)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

6 1396r–8(b)(3)) is amended—

7 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of clause (ii); 

8 (2) by striking the period at the end of clause 

9 (iii) and inserting ‘‘, and’’; and 

10 (3) by inserting after clause (iii) the following 

11 new clause: 

12 ‘‘(iv) that the Secretary shall make 

13 publicly available the information reported 

14 under subparagraph (A)(i) on average 

15 manufacturer price and best price for each 

16 covered outpatient drug.’’. 

17 (b) REPORTING OF METHODOLOGY AND ASSUMP18 TIONS FOR COMPUTING AVERAGE MANUFACTURER

19 PRICE.—Subparagraph (A) of such section is amended by 

20 adding at the end the following: ‘‘The information re21 ported under clause (i) shall include detailed information 

22 (specified by the Secretary) on how the manufacturer com23 putes the average manufacturer price, including assump24 tions used in computing such price.’’. 

25 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

26 this section shall apply to rebate agreements, and informa-
3

•HR 3546 IH 

1 tion reported under such agreements, as of the date that 

2 is first day of the first calendar quarter beginning after 

3 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
§ 291.106 How do I file a complaint? To file a complaint under this part, you must: ( a ) File your complaint with the Director, Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement at the following address: Director, Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, Attention: Office of Policy and Analysis, 1849 C Street, NW., Mail Stop 5438, Washington, DC 20240-0001; and
( b ) Include a nonrefundable processing fee of $7,500 under § 291.108(a) or a request for reduction or waiver of the fee under § 291.109(a); and
( c ) Serve your complaint on all persons named in the complaint. If you make a claim under § 291.111 for confidentiality, serve the redacted copy and proposed form of a protective agreement on all persons named in the complaint.
( d ) Complaints shall not be filed later than 2 years from the time of the alleged access denial. If the complaint is filed later than 2 years from the time of the alleged access denial, the BSEE Director will not consider the complaint and the case will be closed.
[76 FR 64462, Oct. 18, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 36154, June 6, 2016]
Exhibit 31.2



I, Barry D. Michaels, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cardima, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The
registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                      |  |     |  |                                                                
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:    May 12, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Barry D. Michaels                                          
|                      |  |     |  | Barry D. Michaels Interim Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
```

[114th Congress Public Law 296]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 130 STAT. 1509]]

Public Law 114-296
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
401 McElroy Drive in Oxford, Mississippi, as the ``Army First Lieutenant 
Donald C. Carwile Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Dec. 16, 2016 -  [H.R. 
                                5309]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ARMY FIRST LIEUTENANT DONALD C. CARWILE POST OFFICE 
                              BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 401 McElroy Drive in Oxford, Mississippi, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Army First Lieutenant Donald C. Carwile Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Army First 
Lieutenant Donald C. Carwile Post Office Building''.

    Approved December 16, 2016.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5309:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016):
            Sept. 20, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 5, considered and passed Senate; passage vitiated.
            Dec. 9, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of RADA Electronic Industries Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Elan Sigal, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Elan Sigal*
--------------
Elan Sigal
Chief Financial Officer
March 29, 2007

     * The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at
the Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
```
DISMISS and Opinion Filed May 11, 2016.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-16-00452-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.S., JR., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-09-15359

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Bridges and Lang 

Opinion by Justice Lang

Before the Court is appellant’s motion to withdraw its notice of restricted appeal and 

dismiss the appeal. Appellant has informed the Court that it no longer wishes to pursue the 

appeal because the trial court has set aside the order to be appealed. Accordingly, we grant 

appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

160452F.P05

/Douglas S. Lang/

DOUGLAS S. LANG

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF M.S., JR., 

A CHILD

No. 05-16-00452-CV 

On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas.

Trial Court Cause No. DF-09-15359.

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang. Chief 

Justice Wright and Justice Bridges 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that the parties bear their own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered this 11th day of May, 2016.
§ 285.707 What are the CVA's primary duties for facility design review? If you are required to use a CVA: ( a ) The CVA must use good engineering judgment and practices in conducting an independent assessment of the design of the facility. The CVA must verify to BSEE that the facility is designed to withstand the environmental and functional load conditions appropriate for the intended service life at the proposed location and has been designed to minimize risk to personnel as required by § 285.105(a).
( b ) The CVA must conduct an independent assessment of all proposed: ( 1 ) Planning criteria;
( 2 ) Operational requirements;
( 3 ) Environmental loading data;
( 4 ) Load determinations;
( 5 ) Stress analyses;
( 6 ) Material designations;
( 7 ) Soil and foundation conditions;
( 8 ) Safety factors;
( 9 ) Risk assessments supporting the design for human safety and how the results are used in the design; and
( 10 ) Other pertinent parameters of the proposed design.
( c ) For any floating facility, the CVA or project engineer must also verify that any requirements of the U.S. Coast Guard for structural integrity and stability (e.g., verification of center of gravity), have been met. The CVA must also consider: ( 1 ) Foundations, foundation pilings and templates, and anchoring systems; and
( 2 ) Mooring, tendon or tethering systems.
[88 FR 6413, Jan. 31, 2023, as amended at 89 FR 42718, May 15, 2024]