alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **CHAPTER 421—LABOR-MANAGEMENT PROVISIONS**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—EMPLOYEE PROTECTION PROGRAM 1

Sec.
42101.
Definitions.

42102.
Payments to eligible protected employees.
42103.
Duty to hire protected employees.
42104.
Congressional review of regulations.
42105.
Airline Employees Protective Account.
42106.
Ending effective date.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—MUTUAL AID AGREEMENTS AND LABOR REQUIREMENTS OF AIR CARRIERS

42111.
Mutual aid agreements.
42112.
Labor requirements of air carriers.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION PROGRAM

42121.
Protection of employees providing air safety information.

#### Amendments

**2000**—Pub. L. 106–181, title V, §519(b), Apr. 5, 2000, 114 Stat. 149, added heading for subchapter III and item 42121.

1  Subchapter I repealed by Pub. L. 105–220 without corresponding amendment of chapter analysis.
#### PEOPLE, Respondent, v. BULMER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 17, 1905.)

Proceedings by the people of the state of New York against Ames H. Bulmer. No opinion. Judgment of conviction affirmed.
#### Workingmen's Union Association *v.*Reynolds *et al.*

April 13, 1912.

Equitable petition.' Before Judge Cbarlton. Chatham superior court. July 15, 1911.

*Oliver & Oliver,*for plaintiff.

*Travis & Travis,*for defendants.

Beck, J.

An equitable petition was brought by the plaintiff, a corporation, against J. S. Reynolds and others, seeking a decree for the delivery into court and. the cancellation of a deed, and other equitable relief. The deed purported to convey certain real property of which the petitioner was the owner, and it was alleged that the defendants had executed this deed to one Jones in the name of the corporation and ostensibly' in the exercise of authority vestad in them as members and officers of the corporation, but that the deed had been executed without lawful authority and under circumstances which rendered the instrument fraudulent and void. Jones was named as a party defendant but had not been served, and the plaintiff instituted proceedings to have him served and made a party, and a rule nisi was issued for this purpose. When the hearing was had on the proceedings to make him a party, the court discharged the rule and refused the order. To the judgment discharging the rule and refusing the order making Jones a party the plaintiff sued out a direct bill of exceptions. *Held:*

*(а)*That the judgment excepted to is an interlocutory order or judgment; and as it does not appear that the case in which it was sought to make the defendant named a party has been finally decided; the case has been prematurely brought to this court; for, although with respect to a part of the relief sought Jones was a necessary party, the case could proceed against the other parties defendant for other relief which was obtainable under the allegations of the petition as it stood. *Workingmen’s Union Assn.*v. Reynolds, 135 *Ga.*5 (68 S. E. 697).

(б) That this court is without jurisdiction to consider the question raised by the exceptions to a judgment purely interlocutory in nature, and it is therefore ordered that the bill of exceptions be dismissed.

(c) Under the special facts of the ease it is ordered that plaintiff in error have leave to file the official copy of the bill of exceptions now in the office of the clerk of the superior court, as exceptions pendente li£e.

*Writ of error dismissed, with direction.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Exhibit 32.2





18
U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification




In
connection with the Annual Report of NGP Capital Resources Company (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Stephen K. Gardner, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




March 31,
2010


/s/
      STEPHEN K. GARDNERStephen
      K. Gardner,Chief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
NGP Capital Resources Company and will be retained by NGP Capital Resources
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daniel Harley, Also Known as Daniel Hurley, Also Known as Daniel Holley, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered September 17, 1975, convicting him of sodomy in the first degree, sodomy in the second degree and sexual abuse in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and indictment dismissed, with leave to resubmit the charges to another Grand Jury. This case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50. The indictment was fatally defective in that it failed to state the exact nature of the deviate sexual intercourse or the sexual contact with which defendant was charged (see *People v Jackson,*60 AD2d 893; *People v Smith,*60 AD2d 896; *People v Ward,*62 AD2d 1005). Martuscello, J.P., Titone, Suozzi and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 


REGIONS 


1595 Wynkoop Street 


DENVER, CO 80202-1129 


Phone 800-227-8917 


http://www.epa.gov/region08 

AUG - 1 2012 

Ref: 8P-AR 

CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED & ELECTRONIC MAIL 

Jennifer Head 

Regulatory Team Lead 

WPX Energy Williston, LLC 

1001 17th Street, Suite 1200 

Denver, Colorado 80202 

RE: Actual Notice for Approval and Promulgation of 

Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas 

Production Facilities 

Dear Ms. Head, 

This is to notifY you that the EPA has issued a temporary interim final rule promulgating a reservationspecific Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) in order to regulate emissions from oil and natural gas 

production facilities located on the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation (FBIR). The FIP includes basic air 

quality regulations for the protection of communities in and adjacent to the FBIR. The FIP requires 

owners and operators of oil and natural gas production facilities to reduce emissions of volatile organic 

compounds emanating from well completions, recompletions, and production and storage operations. 

The agency proposed a reservation-specific FIP concurrently with this interim final rule. 

The rule is effective with this actual notice to WPX Energy Williston, LLC for purposes of enforcement 

beginning at 5 p.m. (eastern daylight time) on August 3, 2012. We will accept comments on the 

proposed rule for 45 days from the date of publication in the Federal Register. The EPA Administrator, 

Lisa Jackson, signed the interim final rule on August 1, 2012, and the agency is submitting it for 

publication in the Federal Register (FR). 
A copy of the signed interim final rule is enclosed with this letter. The version of the enclosed rule 

serves as the official version for purposes of compliance until the interim final rule is published in the 

FR. Please refer to the published version in a forthcoming FR publication, which will appear on the 

Government Printing Office's FDsys website (http://fdsys.gpo.gov/fdsys/search/home.action) and on 

Regulations.gov (http://www.regulations.gov) in Docket No. EPA-R08-0AR-2012-0479. 

If you have any questions on the interim final rule, please contact Deirdre Rothery at (303) 312-6431. 

r;y~ Carl Daly, Director 

Air Program 

Enclosures 

2
§ 44.2 Definitions. As used in this part, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the term— ( a ) *Act* means the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, Pub. L. 91-173, as amended by Pub. L. 95-164.
( b ) *Secretary, operator, agent, person, miner,* and *coal or other mine,* have the meanings set forth in section 3 of the act.
( c ) *Assistant Secretary* means the Assistant Secretary of Labor for Mine Safety and Health.
( d ) *Administrative law judge* means an administrative law judge of the Department of Labor appointed under section 3105 of title 5 of the United States Code.
( e ) *Representative of miners* means a person or organization designated by two or more miners to act as their representative for purposes of the act and who is in compliance with 30 CFR part 40.
[43 FR 29518, July 7, 1978, as amended at 55 FR 53440, Dec. 28, 1990]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 2000
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          18,001
<SECURITIES>                                    13,423
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,933
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,485
<INVENTORY>                                        578
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,645
<PP&E>                                          16,785
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,785
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  56,984
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,985
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,898
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,984
<SALES>                                          9,622
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,038
<CGS>                                            2,684
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,249
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,415
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   191
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,230
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,595
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,635
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,635
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .35



</TABLE>
### §45106. Relationship to other laws, regulations, standards, and orders

(a) Effect on State and Local Government Laws, Regulations, Standards, or Orders.—A State or local government may not prescribe, issue, or continue in effect a law, regulation, standard, or order that is inconsistent with regulations prescribed under this chapter. However, a regulation prescribed under this chapter does not preempt a State criminal law that imposes sanctions for reckless conduct leading to loss of life, injury, or damage to property.

(b) International Obligations and Foreign Laws.—(1) In prescribing regulations under this chapter, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration—

(A) shall establish only requirements applicable to foreign air carriers that are consistent with international obligations of the United States; and

(B) shall consider applicable laws and regulations of foreign countries.

(2) The Secretaries of State and Transportation jointly shall request the governments of foreign countries that are members of the International Civil Aviation Organization to strengthen and enforce existing standards to prohibit crewmembers in international civil aviation from using alcohol or a controlled substance in violation of law or a United States Government regulation.

(c) Other Regulations Allowed.—This section does not prevent the Administrator from continuing in effect, amending, or further supplementing a regulation prescribed before October 28, 1991, governing the use of alcohol or a controlled substance by airmen, crewmembers, airport security screening employees, air carrier employees responsible for safety-sensitive functions (as decided by the Administrator), or employees of the Administration with responsibility for safety-sensitive functions.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1224; Pub. L. 107–71, title I, §139(3), Nov. 19, 2001, 115 Stat. 640.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 45106(a) | 49 App.:1434(e)(1). | Aug. 23, 1958, Pub. L. 85–726, 72 Stat. 731, §614(e); added Oct. 28, 1991, Pub. L. 102–143, §3(a), 105 Stat. 956. |
| 45106(b) | 49 App.:1434(e)(3). | |
| 45106(c) | 49 App.:1434(e)(2). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the word "prescribe" is substituted for "adopt" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code. The word "rule" is omitted as being synonymous with "regulation". The word "ordinance" is omitted as being included in "law" and "regulation". The words "actual" and "whether the provisions apply specifically to employees of an air carrier or foreign air carrier, or to the general public" are omitted as surplus.

In subsection (c) the word "prevent" is substituted for "restrict the discretion of" to eliminate unnecessary words.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2001—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 107–71 substituted "screening employees" for "screening contract employees".
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3548 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3548

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 on Franklin Avenue in Pearl River, New York, as the ``Heinz Ahlmeyer, 
                      Jr. Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 28, 2005

  Mr. Engel (for himself, Mr. Israel, Mr. Higgins, Mr. Fossella, Mr. 
   Bishop of New York, Mrs. Maloney, Mr. Boehlert, Mr. Ackerman, Mr. 
    Hinchey, Mr. Meeks of New York, Mr. Reynolds, and Mr. Crowley) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 on Franklin Avenue in Pearl River, New York, as the ``Heinz Ahlmeyer, 
                      Jr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HEINZ AHLMEYER, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located on Franklin Avenue in Pearl River, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Heinz Ahlmeyer, Jr. Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Heinz 
Ahlmeyer, Jr. Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 56.12019 Access to stationary electrical equipment or switchgear.

Where access is necessary, suitable clearance shall be provided at stationary electrical equipment or switchgear.
### **CHAPTER 207—LOCOMOTIVES**

Sec.
20701.
Requirements for use.
20702.
Inspections, repairs, and inspection and repair reports.
20703.
Accident reports and investigations.
### §31707. Limitations on statutory construction

Sections 31704 and 31705 of this title do not limit the amount of money a State may charge for registration of a commercial motor vehicle or the amount of any fuel use tax a State may impose.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1033.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 31707 | 49:11506 (note). | Dec. 18, 1991, Pub. L. 102–240, §4008(i), 105 Stat. 2155. |

Section
### SUBCHAPTER III—REGIONAL AIR SERVICE INCENTIVE PROGRAM
#### § 550.233 What decisions will BOEM make on the EP and within what timeframe?

(a) *Timeframe.* The Regional Supervisor will take one of the actions shown in the table in [paragraph (b)](/on/2024-09-16/title-30/section-550.233#p-550.233(b)) of this section within 30 calendar days after the Regional Supervisor deems your EP submitted under [§ 550.231](/on/2024-09-16/title-30/section-550.231), or receives the last amendment to your proposed EP, whichever occurs later.

(b) *BOEM decision.* By the deadline in [paragraph (a)](/on/2024-09-16/title-30/section-550.233#p-550.233(a)) of this section, the Regional Supervisor will take one of the following actions:

| The regional supervisor will . . . | If . . . | And then . . . |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (1) Approve your EP, | It complies with all applicable requirements, | The Regional Supervisor will notify you in writing of the decision and may require you to meet certain conditions, including those to provide monitoring information. |
| (2) Require you to modify your proposed EP, | The Regional Supervisor finds that it is inconsistent with the lease, the Act, the regulations prescribed under the Act, or other Federal laws, | The Regional Supervisor will notify you in writing of the decision and describe the modifications you must make to your proposed EP to ensure it complies with all applicable requirements. |
| (3) Disapprove your EP, | Your proposed activities would probably cause serious harm or damage to life (including fish or other aquatic life); property; any mineral (in areas leased or not leased); the National security or defense; or the marine, coastal, or human environment; and you cannot modify your proposed activities to avoid such condition(s), | (i) The Regional Supervisor will notify you in writing of the decision and describe the reason(s) for disapproving your EP. (ii) BOEM may cancel your lease and compensate you under [43 U.S.C. 1334(a)(2)(C)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/43/1334) and the implementing regulations in [§§ 550.182](/on/2024-09-16/title-30/section-550.182), [550.184](/on/2024-09-16/title-30/section-550.184), and [550.185](/on/2024-09-16/title-30/section-550.185) and [30 CFR 556.77](/on/2024-09-16/title-30/section-556.77). |
### §31302. Commercial driver's license requirement

No individual shall operate a commercial motor vehicle without a valid commercial driver's license issued in accordance with section 31308. An individual operating a commercial motor vehicle may have only one driver's license at any time and may have only one learner's permit at any time.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1015; Pub. L. 105–178, title IV, §4011(b)(1), June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 407; Pub. L. 109–59, title IV, §4122(1), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1734.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 31302 | 49 App.:2701. | Oct. 27, 1986, Pub. L. 99–570, §12002, 100 Stat. 3207–170. |

Section

The words "Effective July 1, 1987" are omitted as executed. The words after "issued a driver's license" are omitted as expired.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2005—Pub. L. 109–59 inserted "and may have only one learner's permit at any time" before period at end.

1998—Pub. L. 105–178 amended section catchline and text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "An individual operating a commercial motor vehicle may have only one driver's license at any time, except during the 10-day period beginning on the date the individual is issued a driver's license."
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsProbabilistic Survivability Versus Time ModelingThis technical paper documents Kennedy Space Centers Independent Assessment team work completed on three assessments for the Ground Systems Development and Operations (GSDO) Program to assist the Chief Safety and Mission Assurance Officer (CSO) and GSDO management during key programmatic reviews. The assessments provided the GSDO Program with an analysis of how egress time affects the likelihood of astronaut and worker survival during an emergency. For each assessment, the team developed probability distributions for hazard scenarios to address statistical uncertainty, resulting in survivability plots over time. The first assessment developed a mathematical model of probabilistic survivability versus time to reach a safe location using an ideal Emergency Egress System at Launch Complex 39B (LC-39B); the second used the first model to evaluate and compare various egress systems under consideration at LC-39B. The third used a modified LC-39B model to determine if a specific hazard decreased survivability more rapidly than other events during flight hardware processing in Kennedys Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB).Based on the composite survivability versus time graphs from the first two assessments, there was a soft knee in the Figure of Merit graphs at eight minutes (ten minutes after egress ordered). Thus, the graphs illustrated to the decision makers that the final emergency egress design selected should have the capability of transporting the flight crew from the top of LC 39B to a safe location in eight minutes or less. Results for the third assessment were dominated by hazards that were classified as instantaneous in nature (e.g. stacking mishaps) and therefore had no effect on survivability vs time to egress the VAB. VAB emergency scenarios that degraded over time (e.g. fire) produced survivability vs time graphs that were line with aerospace industry norms.Document ID20150021266Acquisition SourceKennedy Space CenterDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsJoyner, James J., Sr.*(NASA Kennedy Space Center Cocoa Beach, FL, United States)*Date AcquiredNovember 16, 2015Publication DateSeptember 1, 2015Subject CategorySpace Transportation And SafetyStatistics And ProbabilityReport/Patent NumberNASA/TP-2015-218876KSC-E-DAA-TN26535Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20150021266.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §861. Repealed. July 3, 1950, ch. 446, §5(2), 64 Stat. 320

Section, acts Mar. 2, 1917, ch. 145, §40, 39 Stat. 965; May 17, 1932, ch. 190, 47 Stat. 158, vested judicial power in courts established and in operation on Mar. 2, 1917, provided for appointment of chief justice and associate justices of the supreme court by President with advice and consent of United States Senate, and authorized Puerto Rican legislature to organize, modify or rearrange the courts and their jurisdiction and procedure, except United States District Court.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective July 25, 1952, see note set out under section 732 of this title.