alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### SUBCHAPTER VI—GUAM DEVELOPMENT FUND
EXHIBIT 32





Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tesco Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Julio M. Quintana, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Robert L. Kayl, as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: May 9, 2011

/s/ Julio M. QuintanaJulio M. Quintana

President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: May 9, 2011

/s/ Robert L. KaylRobert L. Kayl

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer








The foregoing certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Tesco Corporation, and will be retained by Tesco Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
ww PREPARED IN COOPERATION WATER-RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 01-4043
PZ se rey tied 1 i a with the Lago Caonillas, Puerto Rico, Bathymetry, February 2000 - PLATE 1

i i PUERTO RICO AQUEDUCT AND SEWER AUTHORITY Soler-Lopez; L.R, 2001
science for a changing world Sedimentation survey of Lago Caonillas, Puerto Rico, February 2000
66°40'00" 66°39'00" 66°38’00”
18°17'00"
EXPLANATION
40.0 RESERVOIR BOTTOM CONTOUR - Depth of the
reservoir bottom, in meters below spillway elevation
of 251.76 meters above mean sea level.
Contour interval is 2.0 meters. Additional 1.0 and 0.5-meter
contours added to represent the shallowest areas
of the reservoir. Shoreline shown as thicker gray line equal
to zero depth or elevation of 251.76 meters above
mean sea level.
18°16'00" ———— es od
18°15'00" |———
| |
8
0 100 300 500 METERS
L 1 1 | 1
i T T T T T T
0) 500 1,000 1,500 FEET
Shoreline modified from the U.S. Geological Survey Quadrangles Adjuntas and Utuado,
Puerto Rico, from aerial photographs taken in 1941 and field checked in 1943
for each auedrangiel Revised in 1960 and 1972, respectively. LAGO CAONILLAS, PUERTO RICO, 3 : :
Lambert conformal conic projection. Puerto Rico state plane coordinate system BATHYMETRY, FEBRUARY 2000 eee at ete re

(Puerto Rico datum, 1940 adjustment). by L.R. Soler-Lopez, 2001
§ 990.290 Compliance with asset management requirements. ( a ) A PHA is considered in compliance with asset management requirements if it can demonstrate substantially, as described in paragraph (b) of this section, that it is managing according to this subpart.
( b ) Demonstration of compliance with asset management will be based on an independent assessment. ( 1 ) The assessment is to be conducted by a professional familiar with property management practices and costs in the region or state in which the PHA is located. This professional is to be procured by HUD.
( 2 ) The professional review and recommendation will then be forwarded to the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing (or designee) for final determination of compliance to asset management.
( c ) Upon HUD's determination of successful compliance with asset management, PHAs will then be funded based on this information pursuant to § 990.165(i).
( d ) PHAs must be in compliance with the project-based accounting and budgeting requirements in this subpart by FY 2007. PHAs must be in compliance with the remainder of the components of asset management by FY 2011.
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00032

- CV

423 C OLONY , L

TD ., Appellant

V

.

T HE I NDEPENDENT E XECUTORS OF
THE E STATE OF P ETER C. K ERN , D AN F LAGG , J OHN C OCHRAN , AND B EN L IPMAN , Appellees §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the Probate Court

of Denton County (PR

- 2014

- 00040

- 03)

May 23, 2019
Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there
was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is reversed and we render judgment in favor of Colony in the amount of

$571,163.54 , and the case is remanded to the trial court for a determination of

Colony ’ s reasonable and necessary attorney ’ s fees, costs, and expen ses.
It is further ordered that appellees The Independent Executors of The Estat e

of Peter C. Kern, Dan Flagg, John Cochran, and Ben Lipman shall pay all of the costs
of this proceeding, for which let execution issue.SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

__ /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

________________ Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
§ 902.107 Withholding, denying, and rescinding troubled designation. ( a ) *Withholding designation.* In exceptional circumstances, even though a PHA has satisfied the requirements for high performer or non-troubled designations, HUD may conduct any review as it may determine necessary, and may deny or rescind incentives or high performer designation or non-troubled performer designation, in the case of a PHA that: ( 1 ) Is operating under a special agreement with HUD (e.g., a civil rights Conciliation or Voluntary Compliance Agreement);
( 2 ) Is involved in litigation that bears directly upon the physical performance of a PHA;
( 3 ) Is operating under a court order;
( 4 ) Demonstrates substantial evidence of fraud or misconduct, including evidence that the PHA's certifications, submitted in accordance with this part, are not supported by the facts, as evidenced by such sources as a HUD review, routine reports, an Office of Inspector General investigation/audit, an independent auditor's audit, or an investigation by any appropriate legal authority; or
( 5 ) Demonstrates substantial noncompliance in one or more areas of a PHA's required compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including areas not assessed under the small rural assessment. Areas of substantial noncompliance include, but are not limited to, noncompliance with civil rights, nondiscrimination and fair housing laws and regulations, or the ACC. Substantial noncompliance casts doubt on the capacity of a PHA to preserve and protect its public housing projects and operate them consistent with Federal laws and regulations.
( b ) *High performer and standard designations.* If a high performer designation is denied or rescinded, the PHA shall be designated either a non-troubled performer, or troubled performer, depending on the nature and seriousness of the matter or matters constituting the basis for HUD's action. If a non-troubled performer designation is denied or rescinded, the PHA shall be designated as a troubled performer.
( c ) *Effect on score.* The denial or rescission of a designation of high performer or non-troubled performer shall not affect the PHA's numerical small rural assessment score, except where the denial or rescission is under paragraph (a)(4) of this section.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth
below is being submitted in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a14(b) or Rule 15d14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Ray C. Dillon, the Chief Executive Officer, and Clefton D. Vaughan, the Chief Financial Officer, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Deltic Timber Corporation.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Ray C. DillonRay C. DillonChief Executive OfficerNovember 2, 2005/s/ Clefton D. VaughanClefton D. VaughanChief Financial OfficerNovember 2, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 238 (Thursday, December 10, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 79501]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27171]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3550-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2020-0001]


Mississippi; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of an Emergency 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Mississippi (FEMA-3550-EM), dated October 28, 2020, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued November 6, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this emergency is closed effective
    October 29, 2020.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Pete Gaynor,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2020-27171 Filed 12-9-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Kelsey, Petty and Senior Judge Bumgardner 

JAMES MELVIN ASHBY 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 0731-07-3 PER CURIAM 

 JULY 31, 2007 

RAMAR COAL COMPANY, INC. AND 

 LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Steven R. Minor; Elliott Lawson & Minor, on brief), for appellant. 

 (Brian J. Rife; Penn, Stuart & Eskridge, on brief), for appellees. 

 James Melvin Ashby (claimant) appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation 

Commission finding that it had no jurisdiction to consider his claim for benefits alleging an 

injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment on April 2, 1994. Claimant 

argues the commission erred in finding that he failed to establish grounds for applying the 

doctrine of imposition to toll the statute of limitations contained in Code § 65.2-601. We have 

reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. See

Cibula v. Allied Fibers & Plastics, 14 Va. App. 319, 324, 416 S.E.2d 708, 711 (1992) (“An 

employer’s voluntary payment of an injured employee’s medical bills does not estop the 

employer from invoking the statute of limitations of Code § 65.1-87 (now Code § 65.2-601).”), 

aff’d, 245 Va. 337, 428 S.E.2d 905 (1993) (per curiam); Tuck v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 

47 Va. App. 276, 285, 623 S.E.2d 433, 437 (2005) (“The application of the [imposition] 

doctrine, however, requires a threshold showing of unfairness: ‘The doctrine focuses on an 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 
- 2 -

employer’s or the commission’s use of superior knowledge of or experience with the Workers’ 

Compensation Act or use of economic leverage, which results in an unjust deprivation to the 

employee of benefits warranted under the Act.’” (citation omitted)). Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Ashby v. Ramar Coal Co., Inc., 

VWC File No. 168-33-22 (Mar. 1, 2007). We dispense with oral argument and summarily 

affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

Affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. Kenneth H. Leeds, Defendant.

Motion for a stay of trial denied. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                            3,403
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                     3,022
<ALLOWANCES>                        385
<INVENTORY>                         176
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  7,056
<PP&E>                           15,433
<DEPRECIATION>                    5,195
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   17,294
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             4,774
<BONDS>                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                         52,677
<OTHER-SE>                       40,548
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     17,294
<SALES>                           4,049
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  4,049
<CGS>                             4,007
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     4,007
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  3,662
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 (3,620)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  (65)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (3,555)
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (3,555)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                     (3,555)
<EPS-BASIC>                       (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                     (0.25)


</TABLE>
----

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 8, 2011 |   /s/ G. Wilson Hughes |
|----------------------|-----------------------------|
|                 | G. Wilson Hughes            |
|                 | President and Director      |
|                 | GCI, Inc.                   |

----
#### §§ 285.654-285.659 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of Cardima,  Inc. (the  "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the quarter  ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 15, 2006

/s/ Gabriel B. Vegh
--------------------
Gabriel B. Vegh
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and Acting Chief Financial Officer
| 1.   | The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 2, 2011, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition at the end of the period covered by the Quarterly Report and results of operations of the Company for the periods covered by the Quarterly Report. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/ Joseph Y. Liu       |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Joseph Y. Liu           |   |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer |   |
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted), Bruce D. Horn, Chief Financial Officer of Oplink
Communications, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:

1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31,
2003, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the "QUARTERLY
REPORT") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition at the end of the period covered by
the Quarterly Report and results of operations of the Company for the periods
covered by the Annual Report.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hands hereto as of the 10th day
of February, 2004.

/s/ Bruce D. Horn
---------------------------------------------
Bruce D. Horn
Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JEAN MARC MARIER
, Appellant,

v.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., etc. et

al.

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 628

[ March 12, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Barry Stone , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 17

- 004268

.

Kenneth Eric Trent of Law Offices of Kenneth Eric Trent, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Richard S. McIver and H. Michae l Muñiz of Kass Shuler, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER
, K LINGENSMITH and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 1210.151 What reports must I submit to claim an excess allowance? ( a ) *General.* If you are a lessee, you must submit Form ONRR-4393, Request to Exceed Regulatory Allowance Limitation, to request approval from ONRR to exceed prescribed transportation and processing allowance limits on Federal oil and gas leases and prescribed transportation allowance limits on Indian oil and gas leases under part 1206 of this chapter.
( b ) *Reporting options.* You may find Form ONRR-4393 at *http://www.onrr.gov/FM/Forms/AFSOil_Gas.htm* or from contacts listed on that Web page.
( c ) *Reporting address.* Submit completed Form ONRR-4393 as follows: ( 1 ) Complete and submit the form electronically as an email attachment to *royaltyvaluation@onrr.gov*;
( 2 ) Send the form by U.S. Postal Service regular or express mail addressed to Office of Natural Resources Revenue, P.O. Box 25165, MS 643000B, Denver, CO 80225-0165; or
( 3 ) Deliver the form to ONRR by special courier or overnight mail addressed to Office of Natural Resources Revenue, Building 85, Room A322, Denver Federal Center, West 6th Ave. and Kipling Blvd., Denver, Colorado 80225.
[48 FR 35641, Aug. 5, 1983, as amended at 76 FR 76615, Dec. 8, 2011; 77 FR 25879, 25880, May 2, 2012; 87 FR 21745, Apr. 13, 2022]