alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 In
connection with the periodic report of Delta Financial Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Hugh Miller, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 1.
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 2.
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      at the dates and for the periods indicated.
 
 This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
 
 
 Date: May 13,
2005
 
 
 
 Hugh
Miller
 *President
and Chief Executive Officer*
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ernest Holley, Appellant.

Motion by appellant to dispense with printing granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers (including the typed minutes) and on appellant’s typewritten brief. The appellant is directed to file six copies of his typewritten brief and to serve one copy on the District Attorney. Appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to the April Term, beginning March 27, 1961; appeal ordered on the calendar for said term. Motion for assignment of counsel granted. Joseph Slavin, Esq., 50 Court Street, Brooklyn, New York, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
II 

Calendar No. 341 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3256 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2005 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

DECEMBER 16, 2005 

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3038 West Liberty Avenue in Pittsburgh, 

Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Congressman James Grove Fulton 

Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 3038 West Liberty in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 

6 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Congressman 

7 James Grove Fulton Memorial Post Office Building’’. 
2 

•HR 3256 RS 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to the ‘‘Congressman James Grove Fulton Memorial Post 

6 Office Building’’. 

Calendar No. 341 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3256 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostBuilding’’. man James Grove Fulton Memorial Post Office in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Congress- al Service located at 3038 West Liberty Avenue 

DECEMBER 16, 2005 

Reported without amendment
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                     SUBSIDIARIES OF MAI SYSTEMS CORPORATION

                                   (12/31/99)


The following is a list showing MAI Systems Corporation and each of its
subsidiaries, as of December 31, 1999, indicating each jurisdiction under the
laws of which it was organized:

                                                         JURISDICITION OF
                     NAME:                                INCORPORATION
                     -----                               ----------------

            MAI SYSTEMS CORPORATION                      DELAWARE

            Gaming Systems International                 Nevada

            MAI Canada Ltd.                              Canada

            CLS Software International, Inc.             California

            CLS de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.                  Mexico

            MAI del Caribe, Inc.                         Delaware

            Computerized Lodging Systems B.V.            Netherlands

            MAI de Venezuela, S.A.                       Venezuela

            Hotel Information Systems Ltd.               Hong Kong

            Hotel Information Systems, Pte. Limited      Singapore

            MAI Information Solutions Limited            United Kingdom

            Boss Solutions Limited                       Hong Kong
#### § 550.270 What decisions will BOEM make on the DPP or DOCD and within what timeframe?

(a) *Timeframe.* The Regional Supervisor will act on your deemed-submitted DPP or DOCD as follows:

(1) The Regional Supervisor will make a decision within 60 calendar days after the latest of the day that:

(i) The comment period provided in [§ 550.267(a)(1)](/on/2024-09-16/title-30/section-550.267#p-550.267(a)(1)), [(a)(2)](/on/2024-09-16/title-30/section-550.267#p-550.267(a)(2)), and [(b)](/on/2024-09-16/title-30/section-550.267#p-550.267(b)) closes;

(ii) The final EIS for a DPP is released or adopted; or

(iii) The last amendment to your proposed DOCD is received by the Regional Supervisor.

(2) Notwithstanding [paragraph (a)(1)](/on/2024-09-16/title-30/section-550.270#p-550.270(a)(1)) of this section, BOEM will not approve your DPP or DOCD until either:

(i) All affected States with approved CZMA programs concur, or have been conclusively presumed to concur, with your DPP or DOCD consistency certification under section 307(c)(3)(B)(i) and (ii) of the CZMA ([16 U.S.C. 1456(c)(3)(B)(i)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/16/1456) and [(ii)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/16/1456)); or

(ii) The Secretary of Commerce has made a finding authorized by section 307(c)(3)(B)(iii) of the CZMA ([16 U.S.C. 1456(c)(3)(B)(iii)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/16/1456)) that each activity described in the DPP or DOCD is consistent with the objectives of the CZMA, or is otherwise necessary in the interest of National security.

(b) *BOEM decision.* By the deadline in [paragraph (a)](/on/2024-09-16/title-30/section-550.270#p-550.270(a)) of this section, the Regional Supervisor will take one of the following actions:

| The regional supervisor will . . . | If . . . | And then . . . |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (1) Approve your DPP or DOCD, | It complies with all applicable requirements, | The Regional Supervisor will notify you in writing of the decision and may require you to meet certain conditions, including those to provide monitoring information. |
| (2) Require you to modify your proposed DPP or DOCD, | It fails to make adequate provisions for safety, environmental protection, or conservation of natural resources or otherwise does not comply with the lease, the Act, the regulations prescribed under the Act, or other Federal laws, | The Regional Supervisor will notify you in writing of the decision and describe the modifications you must make to your proposed DPP or DOCD to ensure it complies with all applicable requirements. |
| (3) Disapprove your DPP or DOCD, | Any of the reasons in [§ 550.271](/on/2024-09-16/title-30/section-550.271) apply, | (i) The Regional Supervisor will notify you in writing of the decision and describe the reason(s) for disapproving your DPP or DOCD; and (ii) BOEM may cancel your lease and compensate you under [43 U.S.C. 1351(h)(2)(C)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/43/1351) and the implementing regulations in [§§ 550.183](/on/2024-09-16/title-30/section-550.183) through [550.185](/on/2024-09-16/title-30/section-550.185) and [30 CFR 556.77](/on/2024-09-16/title-30/section-556.77). |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001022644
<NAME> ELDORADO RESORTS LLC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           7,060
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,754
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,577
<INVENTORY>                                      3,018
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,919
<PP&E>                                         236,503
<DEPRECIATION>                                  74,440
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 237,609
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,086
<BONDS>                                        132,074
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      87,348
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   237,609
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,434
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,774
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   196
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,385
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,921)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,921)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,921)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Dorothy Sorkin et al., Appellants, v. County of Nassau, Respondents.

In a negligence action by plaintiff wife to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as the result of a fall upon a sidewalk, and by her husband to recover damages for medical expenses and for loss of services, the plaintiffs appeal (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 9, 1961, which denied their motion for a preference under rule 4A of the Nassau County Supreme Court Rules; and (2) from an order of said court dated January 18, 1962, which denied their motion based on additional facts and papers, for “ reconsideration ” of the motion for such preference. Order, dated January 18, 1962, affirmed, without costs. On the basis of the medical proof submitted the Special Term properly denied the preference (cf. *Groeger*v. *Mifleb Realty Corp.,*9 A D 2d 684; *Cunningham*v. *Malbin,*8 A D 2d 949). Appeal from the first order of October 9, 1961, dismissed, without costs. The motion which resulted in the second order of January 18, 1962, while nominally characterized by plaintiffs as one for “reconsideration,” actually was a new motion based upon new facts and additional papers. An order which denies such a motion is not only appealable, but it supersedes the first order *(Bentz*v. *Krasner,*15 A D 2d 669; *Polito*v. *Town of Babylon,*5 A D 2d 877). Kleinfold, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
§ 291.112 What process will BSEE follow in rendering a decision on whether a grantee or transporter has provided open and nondiscriminatory access? BSEE will begin processing a complaint upon receipt of a processing fee or granting a waiver of the fee. The BSEE Director will review the complaint, answer, and other information, and will serve all parties with a written decision that: ( a ) Makes findings of fact and conclusions of law; and
( b ) Renders a decision determining whether the complainant has been denied open and nondiscriminatory access.
§ 33.12 Changes after certification. If an applicant desires to change any feature of a certified unit or system, he shall first obtain MSHA's approval of the change, pursuant to the following procedure: ( a ) ( 1 ) Application shall be made as for an original certificate, requesting that the existing certification be extended to cover the proposed changes, and shall be accompanied by drawings, specifications, and related data showing the changes in detail.
( 2 ) Where the applicant for approval has used an independent laboratory under part 6 of this chapter to perform, in whole or in part, the necessary testing and evaluation for approval of changes to an approved product under this part, the applicant must provide to MSHA as part of the approval application: ( i ) Written evidence of the laboratory's independence and current recognition by a laboratory accrediting organization;
( ii ) Complete technical explanation of how the product complies with each requirement in the applicable MSHA product approval requirements;
( iii ) Identification of components or features of the product that are critical to the safety of the product; and
( iv ) All documentation, including drawings and specifications, as submitted to the independent laboratory by the applicant and as required by this part.
( b ) The application will be examined by MSHA to determine whether inspection and testing will be required. Testing will be necessary if there is a possibility that the modification may affect adversely the performance of the unit or system. MSHA will inform the applicant whether such testing is required and the components or materials to be submitted for that purpose.
( c ) If the proposed modification meets the requirements of this part and Part 18 of Subchapter D of this chapter (Bureau of Mines Schedule 2, revised, the current revision of which is Schedule 2F) if applicable, a formal extension of certification will be issued, accompanied by a list of new and corrected drawings and specifications to be added to those already on file as the basis for the extension of certification.
[Sched. 25B, 25 FR 6473, July 9, 1960, as amended at 52 FR 17515, May 8, 1987; 68 FR 36422, June 17, 2003]
§ 33.31 Test space. ( a ) Drilling tests shall be conducted in a test space formed by two curtains suspended across a mine opening in such a manner that the volume of the test space shall be approximately 2,000 cubic feet.
( b ) No mechanical ventilation shall be provided in the test space during a drilling test, except such air movement as may be induced by operation of drilling- or dust-collecting equipment.
( c ) All parts of a unit or system shall be within the test space during a drilling test.
#### Wilson B. Golden, appellee, v. County of Cook, appellant.

Gen. No. 28,475.

Assumpsit for salary as elevator operator. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Thomas G. Windes, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1923.

Reversed.

Opinion filed October 2, 1923.

*Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Robert E. Crowe, State’s Attorney, George E. Gorman, William H. Duval and William H. Gruver, Assistant State’s Attorneys, for appellant. A. D. Gash, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
### Geochemical reconnaissance in the Pequop Mountains and Wood Hills, Elko County, Nevada

By: Ralph Leroy EricksonA. P. MarranzinoUteana OdaW.W. Janes

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1198E

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
# Support Documents for

Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) on

Premanufacture Notice (PM N)

P-02-872

EPA Docket EPA

- HQ

- OPPT -2011-0577

# Index

A-001 Structure Activity Team (SAT) Report for

PMN P-02-872

A-002 Initial Review Engineering Report for

PMN P-02-872

A-003 Initial Review Exposure Report for

PMN P-02-872

# A-001

Structu re Activity Team (SAT) Report

for PMN P-02-872

# A-002

Initial Review Engineering Report

for PMN P-02-872

### The IRER was revised based on discussion with the submitter (via

**Jeff Bauer;10/25/02:NCB)**

. **The changes are bolded. The revised IRER**

**is files as P020872.en1.**

DRAFT

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 02-0872 ENGINEER: Blouin/JB

PV (kg/yr): SUBMITTER: Ashland, Inc.

USE:

OTHER USES: none found.

MSDS: Yes

General Eqp.:

Respirator:

Health Effects:

TLV/PEL (PMN or raw materials):

CRSS:

Chemical Category:

VP: <1E-6 torr @25  C

S-H 2 

### O: 0.0001 g/L

MW: 420 39% < 500 65% < 1000

Phys State: Neat:

Mfg:

Proc/Form: ; End

Use:

Consumer Use: No

SAT (concerns): RELATED CASES:

Migration to Groundwater = negligible

PBT Potential = P1B1T1

Health: 1 (no exposures needed) XB:

### Eco: 3 (all releases to water) XB:

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 2

PMN: 02-0872

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: NR

ASSUMPTIONS:

The submitter was contacted to answer questions, see contact

report.

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW

### INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 3

PMN: 02-0872

MFG:

Site/Location:

Days/yr: (submission)

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES (Eqpt. cleaning, container residue, etc.):

:

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE

Tot. # of workers: (submission)

Days/yr: (submission)

Inhalation: Not required, per SAT

Dermal: Not required, per SAT

### INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 4

PMN: 02-0872

PROC/USE:

Site/Location: (submission)

Days/yr: (submission)

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES (Eqpt. cleaning, container residue, etc.):

from:

Basis:

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE

Tot. # of workers:

Days/yr: (submission)

Inhalation: Not required, per SAT

Dermal: Not required, per SAT

### (Telephone Log)

PMN: 02-0872

CALL BY: Jennifer Biancuzzo (ERG) for EPA/OPPT/CEB

CALL TO:

SUBMITTER: Ashland, Inc.

DATE: 8/14/02

TIME: 10:45 am

Q1:

A1:

Q2:

A2:

Q3:

A3:

Q4:

A4:

Q5:

A5:

# A-003

Initial Review Exposure Report

for PMN P-02-872
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWABS, INC.
                   ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES TRUST 2004-ECC2
                  ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-ECC2


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

     (i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
     preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer
     under the Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

     (ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master
     Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout
     such year.




/s/ Joseph M. Candelario                            Dated: March 29, 2005
------------------------

JOSEPH M. CANDELARIO
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Mark Wong                                       Dated: March 29, 2005
-------------

MARK WONG
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT



                                      15
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MAI SystemsCorporation (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,James D. Dolan, Chief Financial and Operating Officer of the Company, certifypursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: September 21, 2005 | By:    | /s/ James W.  Dolan                    |
|-------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                          |   | James W.  Dolan                        |
|                          |   | Chief  Financial and Operating Officer |

 

----
#### Columbia Banking Savings and Loan Association, Appellant-Respondent, v 42nd Street Properties, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Central Land Development Co., Inc., Respondent-Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs, on the original memorandum, and the memorandum denying the motion to renew, at Special Term, Lynch, J. (Appeals from judgment of Onondaga Supreme Court—mortgage foreclosure.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Cardamone, Hancock, Jr., Denman, and Witmer, JJ.