alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### MEMORANDUM TO FILE

TO: File

FROM: Colleen McKaughan

Date: J anuary 8, 201 4 Subject: Record of Conference Call with the Tohono O’odham Nation (TON) in advance of Public Comment Period
1. Participants in the Conference Call

 TON: Cornelius Antone, Acting Director, TON Environmental Protection Agency; Aaran Udensi , TON EPA Environmental Specialist

 EPA , Region 9 : Colleen McKaughan, Associate Director; Maeve Clancy, Project Officer

2 . General Statement of the Topic of Discussion :

 EPA updated TON regarding two pending EPA proposals

– the proposed action on the Maricopa County Nonattainment Area PM

- 10 Five Percent Plan and the proposed redesignation of Maricopa County to attainment for the 1997 8

- hour ozone standard , and approval of the maintenance plan

 EPA wanted to alert TON to these pending actions and respond to their questions, and make sure they had the opportunity to participate in the public comment process. EPA offered to make themselves available for consultation, if re quested.

 While these actions involve state plans and control measures, which do not apply on reservation land, they do reflect an improvement in air quality which should benefit the tribes in Maricopa County.

 TON now has reservation land in the City of Gle ndale in Maricopa County so the Tribe consider s themselves to be impacted by actions in Maricopa County. This was confirmed by EPA on the January 8 th call.

 The Tribe asked if a letter could be sent to the Tribal Chairman’s Office about these actions. EPA responded that we can send one; the Tribe just needs to ask.
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.177 What additional requirements may the Regional Supervisor order for a suspension? If BSEE grants or directs a suspension under paragraph § 250.172(b), the Regional Supervisor may require you to: ( a ) Conduct a site-specific study. ( 1 ) The Regional Supervisor must approve or prescribe the scope for any site-specific study that you perform.
( 2 ) The study must evaluate the cause of the hazard, the potential damage, and the available mitigation measures.
( 3 ) You must pay for the study unless you request, and the Regional Supervisor agrees to arrange, payment by another party.
( 4 ) You must furnish copies and results of the study to the Regional Supervisor.
( 5 ) BSEE will make the results available to other interested parties and to the public.
( 6 ) The Regional Supervisor will use the results of the study and any other information that becomes available: ( i ) To decide if the suspension can be lifted; and
( ii ) To determine any actions that you must take to mitigate or avoid any damage to the environment, life, or property.
( b ) Submit a revised Exploration Plan (including any required mitigating measures);
( c ) Submit a revised Development and Production Plan (including any required mitigating measures); or
( d ) Submit a revised Development Operations Coordination Document according to 30 CFR part 550, subpart B.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
June 30, 2004 (the "Report") of Pinnacle Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company"), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the
undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies that to the best of my knowledge:


     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



/s/ Robert B. Nolen, Jr.
-------------------------------------------------
Robert B. Nolen, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and
  Chief Financial Officer


August 16, 2004
-------------------------------------------------
(Date)




     A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The information
furnished herein shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER OF TRAMMELL CROW COMPANYPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Qfor the period ending September 30, 2004 and filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert E. Sulentic,Chief Executive Officer of Trammell Crow Company (the “Company”), herebycertify that:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|          | /s/ ROBERT E. SULENTIC       |
|----------|------------------------------|
|     | Name: Robert E.  Sulentic    |
| * * | Date: November 9,  2004 |

 

----
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION**




I,
      Steven
      Walin, Chief Executive Officer of GVI Security Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”),
      hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(i)
      The
      Company’s accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended
      March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(ii)
      The
      information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/
                Steven WalinSteven
                Walin
              Chief
                Executive Officer


Dated:
      May 11, 2007
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1918 What criteria for emergency response and control must be in my SEMS program? Your SEMS program must require that emergency response and control plans are in place and are ready for immediate implementation. These plans must be validated by drills carried out in accordance with a schedule defined by the SEMS training program (§ 250.1915). The SEMS emergency response and control plans must include: ( a ) Emergency Action Plan that assigns authority and responsibility to the appropriate qualified person(s) at a facility for initiating effective emergency response and control, addressing emergency reporting and response requirements, and complying with all applicable governmental regulations;
( b ) Emergency Control Center(s) designated for each facility with access to the Emergency Action Plans, oil spill contingency plan, and other safety and environmental information (§ 250.1910); and
( c ) Training and Drills incorporating emergency response and evacuation procedures conducted periodically for all personnel (including contractor's personnel), as required by the SEMS training program (§ 250.1915). Drills must be based on realistic scenarios conducted periodically to exercise elements contained in the facility or area emergency action plan. An analysis and critique of each drill must be conducted to identify and correct weaknesses.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF REGISTERED INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

ClearPoint Business Resources, Inc. 

We hereby consent to the incorporation in the Company’s previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-144209 filed June 29, 2007) and RegistrationStatement on Form S-3 (No. 333-122439 filed June 29, 2007) of our report dated April 15, 2008 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the related financial statement schedule of ClearPoint Business Resources, Inc. and Subsidiariesincluded in this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

/s/ Lazar Levine & Felix LLP 

LAZAR LEVINE & FELIX LLP 

Morristown, New Jersey 

April 15, 2008
#### BOICE, Respondent, v. JONES, et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 16, 1903.)

Action by Hewitt Boice against Percival S. Jones and others.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs.
(June 7, 1962)

#### Francis H. Leggett & Company, Subsidiary of Seeman Brothers, Inc., Appellant, v. Fred Eger et al., Respondents.

Order, entered on August 16, 1961, denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, in this action upon a written guarantee, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. Leave is granted, however, to defendants to move within 30 days of the service of the order herein to vacate the order and any judgment thereon upon affidavits showing facts establishing a counterclaim for reformation of the guarantee. There is no dispute that defendants signed and delivered the written guaraní; e, and, whether it be a complete or *889only a partial integration of the understanding among the parties, it cannot be varied or contradicted by parol evidence *(Laskey*v. *Rubel Corp.,*303 N. Y. 69; Restatement, Contracts, § 239; 3 Corbin, Contracts, § 581). Confining the written guarantee to the pre-existing obligation, as defendants sock to do, would contradict the express language of the writing. It may be, however, that defendants would be able to plead, and to establish by *“*clear, positive and convincing evidence”, that the writing should be reformed on the ground of fraud or mistake (see *Amend*v. *Hurley,*293 N. Y. 587, 595; Restatement, Contracts, §§ 504, 505; 6 N. Y. Jur., Cancellation and Reformation of Instruments, §§ 22-51, especially §§ 29, 41-49). If so, they should be given an opportunity to do so and, thereby, to avoid summary judgment. Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
### | 1 |

© 2016 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved.For Official Use Only

Draft – Work in Progress 

# EWR Average Daily Delay

Airport Scenario Arrival Count Delay	(Minutes) Number	of	Flights	Delayed Schedule Capacity Total Mean Mean Positive >0 >15 60+ 120+ [60,120)
EWR (Arrivals) Negotiated	Summer 2008 2007 672 16,100 24.0 26.9 572 233 94.1 24.0 70.1 Summer	2015 January	2013 - February	2015	(minus construction	months) 616 10,100 16.3 18.6 507 133 41.1 17.8 23.3 Difference -8% -37% -32% - 31% - 11% -43% -56% - 26% - 67% Airport Scenario Departure Count Delay	(Minutes) Number	of	Flights	Delayed Schedule Capacity Total Mean Mean Positive >0 >15 60+ 120+ [60,120)
EWR (Departures) Negotiated	Summer 2008 2007 669 12,000 18.0 19.1 618 257 15.7 4.39 11.3 Summer	2015 January	2013 - February	2015	(minus construction	months) 622 8,900 14.2 15.3 562 177 13.5 7.80 5.70 Difference -7% - 26% -21% - 20% -9% - 31% - 14% 78% -50%

### | 2 |

© 2016 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved.For Official Use Only

Draft – Work in Progress 

# EWR Average Hourly Arrival Delay

Airport Scenario Arrival Count Delay	(Minutes) Number	of	Flights	Delayed Schedule Capacity Total Mean Mean Positive >0 >15 60+ 120+ [60,120)
EWR (Arrivals) Negotiated	Summer 2008 2007 672 16,100 24.0 26.9 572 233 94.1 24.0 70.1 Summer	2015 January	2013 - February	2015	(minus construction	months) 616 10,100 16.3 18.6 507 133 41.1 17.8 23.3 Difference -8% -37% -32% -31% - 11% -43% -56% - 26% - 67%

### | 3 |

© 2016 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved.For Official Use Only

Draft – Work in Progress 

# EWR Average Hourly Departure Delay

Airport Scenario Departure Count Delay	(Minutes) Number	of	Flights	Delayed Schedule Capacity Total Mean Mean Positive >0 >15 60+ 120+ [60,120)
EWR (Departures) Negotiated	Summer 2008 2007 669 12,000 18.0 19.1 618 257 15.7 4.39 11.3 Summer	2015 January	2013 - February	2015	(minus construction	months) 622 8,900 14.2 15.3 562 177 13.5 7.80 5.70 Difference -7% - 26% -21% - 20% -9% - 31% - 14% 78% -50%
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Willowtree Advisors, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Cynthia Allison, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 2nd day of November, 2005.



| | /s/ Cynthia Allison                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Cynthia Allison                                    
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



















---
#### In the Matter of Duallo Realty Corp. et al., Appellants, v. Charles A. Silver et al., Constituting the Board of Appeals of the City of Long Beach, Respondents, and Temple Emanu-el of Long Beach, Inc., Intervenor-Respondent.

Motion by intervenor respondent to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs; appeal dismissed. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.
130 STAT. 1518 PUBLIC LAW 114–303—DEC. 16, 2016 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5798: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

Sept. 20, 22, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 5, considered and passed Senate; passage vitiated. 

Dec. 9, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–303 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1101 Davis 

Street in Evanston, Illinois, as the ‘‘Abner J. Mikva Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ABNER J. MIKVA POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 1101 Davis Street in Evanston, Illinois, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Abner J. Mikva Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Abner J. Mikva Post Office Building’’. 

Approved December 16, 2016. 

Dec. 16, 2016 

[H.R. 5798] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
#### A. B. Hilty, appellee, v. In re estate of Martin W. Deem, deceased, H. B. Phillips, administrator, appellant.

Claim against estate of a deceased on ground of alleged one-fourth interest in a drilling machine sold by the administrator. Judgment against the estate. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Clark county; the Hon. Walter Brewer, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 23, 1923.

Rehearing denied June 26, 1923.

John J. Arney and S. M. Scholfield, for appellant. Graham *&*Suavely, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Niehaus

delivered the opinion of the court.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3362 

To protect small businesses from increased tariffs and other retaliatory 

actions taken by the United States during a trade dispute. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 20, 2005 

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To protect small businesses from increased tariffs and other 

retaliatory actions taken by the United States during 

a trade dispute. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Trade 

5 Dispute Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN SMALL BUSINESSES FROM 

7 INCREASED TARIFFS AND OTHER ACTIONS 

8 DURING TRADE DISPUTES. 

9 In any case in which— 
2 

•HR 3362 IH 

1 (1) the United States and one or more other 

2 countries are parties to a trade dispute under a 

3 trade agreement, and 

4 (2) the United States increases tariffs on goods 

5 of such other country or countries or imposes other 

6 import restrictions on goods of such other country or 

7 countries on account of the failure of that country 

8 or countries to come into compliance with the terms 

9 of the trade agreement, in accordance with the find10 ings under dispute settlement proceedings under the 

11 agreement with respect to the dispute, 

12 an importer of those goods shall be exempt, to the extent 

13 provided in section 2, from such increases and from the 

14 imposition of such other import restrictions. 

15 SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON EXEMPTION. 

16 The exemption under section 1 shall apply to an im17 porter of goods in a calendar year— 

18 (1) if the importer had fewer than 100 full-time 

19 employees (or their equivalents) during the pre20 ceding 2 calendar quarters; and 

21 (2) only for that quantity of those goods which 

22 does not exceed 125 percent of the quantity of the 

23 same goods that are products of the country or 
3 

•HR 3362 IH 

1 countries referred to in section 1 and were imported 

2 by that importer in the preceding calendar year. 

Æ
#### Muriel D. Keller, Respondent, v. Quad Realty Corp. et al., Defendants, and Elizabeth Seversky, Intervenor-Defendant. Norc Realty Corp., *681Appellant; Edward V. Loughlin, as Referee, Respondent.

Order, dated January 14, 1960, granting plaintiff’s application for an order determining that all past and due and accrued interest owing on an open first mortgage, subject to which the premises were sold, was the obligation of the purchaser and was not to be paid by the Referee or allowed by him as a credit to the purchaser’s account, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally and Stevens, JJ. [23 Misc 2d 757.]
<PAGE>
Exhibit 23.1

               REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


Board of Directors
MAI Systems Corporation
Lake Forest, California

The audit referred to in our report dated April 14, 2003 relating to the
consolidated financial statements of MAI Systems Corporation, as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2002, which is incorporated in Item 15 of the Form 10-K
by reference to the annual report to stockholders for the year ended December
31, 2002 included the audit of the financial statement schedule listed as
Exhibit 23.4. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this 2002
financial statement schedule based upon our audit.

In our opinion such financial statement schedule presents fairly, in all
material respects, the information set forth therein.

                           /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP



Costa Mesa, California
April 14, 2003

                                       66
130 STAT. 1512 PUBLIC LAW 114–299—DEC. 16, 2016 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5612: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

Sept. 20, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 9, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–299 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2886 Sandy 

Plains Road in Marietta, Georgia, as the ‘‘Marine Lance Corporal Squire ‘Skip’ 

Wells Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. MARINE LANCE CORPORAL SQUIRE ‘‘SKIP’’ WELLS POST 

OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 2886 Sandy Plains Road in Marietta, Georgia, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Marine Lance Corporal 

Squire ‘Skip’ Wells Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Marine Lance Corporal Squire ‘Skip’ Wells Post Office 

Building’’. 

Approved December 16, 2016. 

Dec. 16, 2016 

[H.R. 5612] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
From: Miller, William [mailto:wmiller@McCarter.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 4:59 PM

To: Cohen, Daniel

Cc: Clay, Kathryn; 'Dave Schryver'; Cymbalsky, John; 'Bert Kalisch'; rmurphy@aga.org; Leslie, Neil 

(Neil.Leslie@gastechnology.org)

Subject: RE: Furnaces Data

Dan: per our earlier email exchanges, attached are the initial questions of APGA/AGA regarding the LCC 

spreadsheets distributed by DOE regarding the furnace rule remand. We anticipate that we will have 

additional questions by the time of the Nov. 7 meeting, as we are continuing our review; we also 

anticipate that the answers provided at the Nov. 7 meeting will inevitably lead to follow-up questions 

and answers in order to better understand the contents of these very complex spreadsheets. If there 

are any clarification questions about our questions that DOE would like to have answered before the 

Nov. 7 meeting in order to make it a more productive session, please contact us. In any event, we will 

be prepared to begin the Nov. 7 meeting with our questions being asked and answered. Thank you for 

your continued cooperation in this matter. Bud
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002









In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Cardima, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Cheney, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      November 13, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Robert
      CheneyRobert
      CheneyChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be filed by the Company
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.