alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 57.11002 Handrails and toeboards.

Crossovers, elevated walkways, elevated ramps, and stairways shall be of substantial construction, provided with handrails, and maintained in good condition. Where necessary, toeboards shall be provided.
# ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

May 17, 2024 CR-2023-0646 Ocie Lee Lynch v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Talladega Circuit Court: CC-12- 262.60) 

## NOTICE You are hereby notified that on May 17, 2024, the following action was taken in the above-reference cause by the Court of Criminal Appeals: Application for Rehearing Overruled.

D. Scott Mitchell, Clerk
#### § 22.3 [Reserved]
§ 48.9 Records of training. ( a ) Upon a miner's completion of each MSHA approved training program, the operator shall record and certify on MSHA form 5000-23 that the miner has received the specified training. A copy of the training certificate shall be given to the miner at the completion of the training. The training certificates for each miner shall be available at the minesite for inspection by MSHA and for examination by the miners, the miner's representative, and State inspection agencies. When a miner leaves the operator's employ, the miner shall be entitled to a copy of his training certificates.
( b ) False certification that training was given shall be punishable under section 110 (a) and (f) of the Act.
( c ) Copies of training certificates for currently employed miners shall be kept at the minesite for 2 years, or for 60 days after termination of employment.
(Pub. L. No. 96-511, 94 Stat. 2812 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*))
[43 FR 47459, Oct. 13, 1978, as amended at 47 FR 14706, Apr. 6, 1982; 60 FR 33722, June 29, 1995]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jean Medor, Appellant.

[833 NYS2d 100]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (James A. Yates, J.), rendered March 11, 2004, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of five years’ probation with 100 hours of community service, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility *(see People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Defendant’s intent to cause physical injury could be readily inferred from evidence that he swung a backpack containing two bottles of wine, a hammer and two screwdrivers at the victim’s head, with enough force to break one of the bottles. The element of physical injury was established by the victim’s testimony that the assault caused a lump on the back of his head, along with pain lasting two or three days requiring treatment with medication and ice *(see People v Guidice,*83 NY2d 630, 636 [1994]; *People v Staple-ton,*33 AD3d 464 [2006], 7 NY3d 904 [2006]). Moreover, the victim’s testimony was corroborated by police testimony and hospital records. Finally, under the circumstances of its use, the *363backpack weighted with hard and heavy objects constituted a dangerous instrument (see *People v Carter,*53 NY2d 113 [1981]).

At trial, defendant did not raise a justification defense, and he did not request such an instruction prior to jury deliberations. However, the deliberating jury inquired about the circumstances in which an assault would be justified. The court provided a meaningful response to that inquiry when it restated the elements of assault and told the jury not to consider any legal theories upon which it had not been charged *(see People v Aquevareno,*17 AD3d 171 [2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 784 [2005]). The issue of justification was never litigated during the trial, and, in any event, there was no reasonable view of the evidence supporting such defense.

We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining arguments concerning the court’s responses to jury notes. Concur— Mazzarelli, J.P., Sullivan, Sweeny, Malone and Kavanagh, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leo M. Cudney, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously modified in accordance with memorandum and, as modified, affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, entered on April 22, 1974 after a jury verdict, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a dangerous drug in the fifth degree and criminal sale of a dangerous drug in the fourth degree. Defendant was sentenced to an indeterminate term with a maximum of three years on each count, to be served concurrently. The People concede that the count of criminal possession of a dangerous drug in the fifth degree should have been dismissed after the verdict as a lesser included offense of criminal sale of a dangerous drug in the fourth degree. We find defendant’s other allegations of error to be without merit and affirm *1140his conviction of criminal sale of a dangerous drug; however, we modify the judgment, insofar as it imposes sentence, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (CPL 470.15, subd 3, par [c]), by reducing the sentence to time served. (Appeal from judgment of Erie Supreme Court convicting defendant of criminal possession of a dangerous drug, fifth degree, and another charge.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Dillon, Hancock, Jr., Denman and Witmer, JJ.
### §645. Repealed. Pub. L. 86–3, §14(f), Mar. 18, 1959, 73 Stat. 10

Section, acts Apr. 30, 1900, ch. 339, §86, 31 Stat. 158; Mar. 3, 1909, ch. 269, §1, 35 Stat. 838; Mar. 11, 1911, ch. 231, §291, 36 Stat. 167; Mar. 4, 1920, ch. 161, §1, 41 Stat. 1412; July 9, 1921, ch. 42, §313, 42 Stat. 119; June 1, 1922, ch. 204, title II, 42 Stat. 614, 616; Jan. 3, 1923, ch. 21, title II, 42 Stat. 1084; Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 220, 43 Stat. 890; Dec. 13, 1926, ch. 6, §1, 44 Stat. 919; Jan. 31, 1928, ch. 14, §1, 45 Stat. 54; July 31, 1946, ch. 704, §1, 60 Stat. 716; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §§8, 39, 62 Stat. 986, 992, related to removal of causes and appeal. See section 91 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure and notes thereunder.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF WEIDER NUTRITION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AS
OF, AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDING NOVEMBVER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997   
<CASH>                                           1,176  
<SECURITIES>                                         0      
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,614 
<ALLOWANCES>                                       472    
<INVENTORY>                                     55,561 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               102,917
<PP&E>                                          50,830 
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,160 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 180,885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,705 
<BONDS>                                         57,232 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0      
<PREFERRED>                                          0      
<COMMON>                                           247    
<OTHER-SE>                                      94,701 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   180,885
<SALES>                                        114,326
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               114,326
<CGS>                                           75,823 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   75,823 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,101 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   375    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,284  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,925  
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,701  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,224  
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,224  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17    
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17    
                                                         

</TABLE>
On November 17, 2011, Mr. Ted Hake, production manager at Universal Seed Company, made a public statement at the meeting seeking public comment on the Roundup Ready Sugar Beet draft Environmental Impact Statement in Corvallis, OR (pp. 80 - 81 of the transcr ipt at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=APHIS - 2010 - 0047 - 4655 ) On November 28, 2011, a comment from Mr. Hake was posted to correct information provided earlier by him in his 11/17/2011 oral public comment. http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=APHIS - 2010 - 0047 - 3281 On December 7, 2011, ano ther comment from Mr. Hake was posted to further correct information provided earlier by him in his 11/17/2011 oral public comment . http://www.regulations.gov/#!documen tDetail;D=APHIS - 2010 - 0047 - 3512 The attachment accompanying this posting includes emails between BRS and Mr. Tichinin, Mr. Hake’s supervisor and President of Universal Seed Company, during the period between January 19, 2012 and January 24, 2012, to furt her explain and clarify Mr. Hake’s submitted public comments with respect to which particular years of vegetable beet seed harvests were tested in 2010, the number of fields in each particular year that tested positive for the H7 - 1 trait, and the submissi on of new results from seed that was harvested and tested in 2011.
§ 1241.4 How will ONRR serve a Notice? ( a ) We will serve a NONC, FCCP, or ILCP as set out in FOGRMA section 109(h) (30 U.S.C. 1719) by registered mail or personal service to the addressee of record or alternate, as identified in 30 CFR 1218.540.
( b ) We will consider the Notice served on the date when it was delivered to the addressee of record or alternate, as identified in 30 CFR 1218.540.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00297-CV

THE WILLIAM J. SCHNABEL REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST

v.

REBECCA H. LOREDO, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A LOREDO CONSTRUCTION 

COMPANY

On Appeal from the

332nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-2461-06-F

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 14, 2014
§ 56.7052 Drilling positions. Persons shall not drill from— ( a ) Positions which hinder their access to the control levers;
( b ) Insecure footing or insecure staging; or
( c ) Atop equipment not suitable for drilling.
Internet Address (URL) http://epa.gov UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WA SHINGTON, D.C. 20460 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION MEMORANDUM TO: Docket EPA - HQ - OAR - 2009 - 0472 FROM: Jason Samenow

Climate Change Division, Office of Atmospheric Programs SUBJECT: Im pact of Li ght Duty Vehicle Emissions Reductions on Global Climate Enclosed is the tech nical report prepared by the Joint Global Change Research In stitute , which is part of the Pacific Northwest National L aboratory . This document describes the methodology

used to analy

ze the impacts of EPA’s Li ght - Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards on sea level rise and global mean temperature. Also enclosed is an excel spreadsheet containing the more detailed model results supporting the technical report.

Enclosures
####                                     In the Region                                

##                                 Geographic Mobility Trends: New Englanders Still Aren’t Moving as Much as Before the Pandemic                            

                                    Read more                                

####                                     In the Region                                

##                                 New England is aging. Can immigration help with workforce woes?                            

In the nation’s oldest states, immigrants emerge as one solution to a persistent problem

                                    Read more                                

####                                     Payments Innovation                                

##                                 Stomp out scams with the ScamClassifier model                            

The payments industry has a new tool to improve scam reporting, detection, and mitigation

                                    Read more                                

Geographic Mobility Trends: New Englanders Still Aren’t Moving as Much as Before the Pandemic

New England is aging. Can immigration help with workforce woes?

Stomp out scams with the ScamClassifier model

####                                     In the Region                                

##                                 Geographic Mobility Trends: New Englanders Still Aren’t Moving as Much as Before the Pandemic                            

                                    Read more                                

####                                         In the Region                                    

##                                     New England is aging. Can immigration help with workforce woes?                                

In the nation’s oldest states, immigrants emerge as one solution to a persistent problem

                                        Read more                                    

####                                         Payments Innovation                                    

##                                     Stomp out scams with the ScamClassifier model                                

The payments industry has a new tool to improve scam reporting, detection, and mitigation

                                        Read more                                    

    Office of the President                                Susan M. Collins                        
                            Speeches, biography & more                        

                        FedNow Service                    
                        Facilitating a new instant payment service                    

                        Six Hundred Atlantic                    
                        Podcast of the Boston Fed
### 11 Record of Discussion

Docket No. FAA

- Directorate Identifier:

- AD

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder,

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED

Airlines for America Bob Ireland 9/2 3 /2015 Sent email to Bob

informing him that an AD

worksheet was generated

to mandate actions in

Boeing Alert Service

Bulletin 737

- 57A1326,

Original Issue, dated

September 22, 2015

The Boeing Company Dan Poblete, Paul Fiocca 9/22/2015 , 9/23/2015 Requested information

regarding number of N

registered airplanes and

Major US Operators

.



### Other/Additional Information:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
        <C> <S>
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the Balance Sheet at June 30, 1998 and Income Statement for the
quarter ended June 30, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<C>                                             <S>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          165
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,072
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     25,605
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                709,749
<PP&E>                                          1,220
<DEPRECIATION>                                  672
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  195,202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           644,426
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                        254,043
<OTHER-SE>                                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    898,469
<SALES>                                         24,032
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,369
<CGS>                                           12,812
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   1,321,816
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,303
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,310,750)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,310,750)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.115)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.115)




</TABLE>
#### Helen Schaefer, Respondent, v. Saul Yellin, as President of Amalgamated Union Local 5, U. A. W., et al., Appellants.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent. No opinion. Concur • — Botein, P. J., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
#### § 56.19094 Posting signal code.

A legible signal code shall be posted prominently in the hoist house within easy view of the hoistman, and at each place where signals are given or received.
#### § 1203.251 Reduction in royalty rate or rental.

An application for reduction in coal royalty rate or rental shall be filed and processed in accordance with 43 CFR group 3400.

[54 FR 1522, Jan. 13, 1989]
§ 56.6901 Black powder. ( a ) Black powder shall be used for blasting only when a desired result cannot be obtained with another type of explosive, such as in quarrying certain types of dimension stone.
( b ) Containers of black powder shall be— ( 1 ) Nonsparking;
( 2 ) Kept in a totally enclosed cargo space while being transported by a vehicle;
( 3 ) Securely closed at all times when— ( i ) Within 50 feet of any magazine or open flame;
( ii ) Within any building in which a fuel-fired or exposed-element electric heater is operating; or
( iii ) In an area where electrical or incandescent-particle sparks could result in powder ignition; and
( 4 ) Opened only when the powder is being transferred to a blasthole or another container and only in locations not listed in paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
( c ) Black powder shall be transferred from containers only by pouring.
( d ) Spills shall be cleaned up promptly with nonsparking equipment. Contaminated powder shall be put into a container of water and shall be disposed of promptly after the granules have disintegrated, or the spill area shall be flushed promptly with water until the granules have disintegrated completely.
( e ) Misfires shall be disposed of by washing the stemming and powder charge from the blasthole, and removing and disposing of the initiator in accordance with the requirement for damaged explosives.
( f ) Holes shall not be reloaded for at least 12 hours when the blastholes have failed to break as planned.
### §258. Illegal changes in subscriber carrier selections

#### (a) Prohibition

No telecommunications carrier shall submit or execute a change in a subscriber's selection of a provider of telephone exchange service or telephone toll service except in accordance with such verification procedures as the Commission shall prescribe. Nothing in this section shall preclude any State commission from enforcing such procedures with respect to intrastate services.

#### (b) Liability for charges

Any telecommunications carrier that violates the verification procedures described in subsection (a) and that collects charges for telephone exchange service or telephone toll service from a subscriber shall be liable to the carrier previously selected by the subscriber in an amount equal to all charges paid by such subscriber after such violation, in accordance with such procedures as the Commission may prescribe. The remedies provided by this subsection are in addition to any other remedies available by law.

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title II, §258, as added Pub. L. 104–104, title I, §101(a), Feb. 8, 1996, 110 Stat. 77.)
#### Musette Goff, administratrix of the estate of Henry F. Goff, deceased, appellee, v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 7,199.

Suit by widow for death of husband. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Knox county; the Hon. Walter C. Prank, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1923.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed September 7, 1923.

J. A. Connell and Williams, Lawrence, Green & Gale, for appellant. Marsh, Rice and Thompson, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Partlow

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §30303. State participation

(a) Notification.—A State may become a participating State under this chapter by notifying the Secretary of Transportation of its intention to be bound by section 30304 of this title.

(b) Withdrawal.—A participating State may end its status as a participating State by notifying the Secretary of its withdrawal from participation in the National Driver Register.

(c) Form and Way of Notification.—Notification by a State under this section shall be made in the form and way the Secretary prescribes by regulation.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 974.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30303 | 23:401 (note). | Oct. 25, 1982, Pub. L. 97–364, §204, 96 Stat. 1742. |

Section

In subsection (c), the words "in the form and way" are substituted for "in such form, and according to such procedures" to eliminate unnecessary words.