alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §13103. Remedies as cumulative

Except as otherwise provided in this part, the remedies provided under this part are in addition to remedies existing under another law or common law.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §103, Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 856.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 10103 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
## SUBTITLE I—DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Chapter
Sec.
1.
Organization
101
3.
General Duties and Powers
301
5.
Special Authority
501

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2024**—Pub. L. 118–63, title XI, §1101(b), May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1413, struck out item for chapter 7 "Surface Transportation Board".

**1995**—Pub. L. 104–88, title II, §201(b), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 940, added item for chapter 7.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Iain A.
McCready, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




/s/
      Iain A. McCreadyIain
      A. McCready
                  Chief
      Executive Officer
                  May
      17, 2010
**Exhibit32.1**

 

The followingcertifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuantto    18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordancewith SEC Release No. 33-8238. These certifications shall not be deemed“filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, nor shall they be incorporated by reference in any filing of theCompany under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, whether made before orafter the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in suchfiling.

 

 

**Certificationof Chief Executive Officer**

 

Pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Weider NutritionInternational, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), herebycertifies, to his knowledge, that:

 

(i)  the accompanying Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of the Company for the period ended February 29, 2004 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and

 

(ii)  the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

 
| Dated: April 14, 2004 | /s/  BRUCE J.  WOOD |   |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------|--------|
|                  |                          |
|                  | Bruce J. Wood                 |
|                  | Chief Executive Officer       |

 

 

**Certificationof Chief Financial Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created bySection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer ofWeider Nutrition International, Inc. a Delaware, corporation (the“Company”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:

 

(i)  the accompanying Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of the Company for the period ended February 29, 2004 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)  the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

 
| Dated: April 14, 2004 | /s/  JOSEPH  W. BATY |   |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                  |                           |
|                  | Joseph W. Baty                 |
|                  | Chief Financial Officer        |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Weider NutritionInternational, Inc. and will be retained by Weider NutritionInternational, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### Lloyd Norton, Plaintiff, v. Conley J. Marsh et al., Defendants.

Motion for a stay granted and execution of judgment stayed pending hearing and determination of appeal upon filing by the plaintiff of a bond in the amount of $500 in accordance with section 593 of the Civil Practice Act and upon the further condition that the plaintiff serve and file records and briefs on appeal on or before December 8, 1960 and the case be argued at the January 1961 Term. Respondent’s brief will not be accepted unless filed and served on or before December 23, 1960.
```

Authorization

The undersigned hereby appoints each of Peter Pounds, Lynda Tarbath, Bryan Fick, and Carren Walters, signing singly, the undersigned's true and lawful attorney-in-fact to:

(1) execute for and on the behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned's capacity as an affiliate of General Communication, Inc. (the "Company"), Form 4 and Form 5 in accordance with section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules thereunder;

(2) do and perform any and all acts for and on behalf of the undersigned which may be necessary or desirable to complete and execute any such Form 4 and Form 5, complete and execute any amendment or amendments thereto, and timely file such form with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any stock exchange or similar authority; and

(3) take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit to, in the best interest of, or legally required by, the undersigned, it being understood that the documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on behalf of the undersigned pursuant to this Power of Attorney shall be in such form and shall contain such terms and conditions as such attorney-in-fact may approve in such attorney-in-fact's discretion.

    The undersigned hereby grants to each such attorney-in-fact full power and authority to do and perform any and every act and thing whatsoever requisite, necessary, or proper to be done in the exercise of any of the rights and powers herein granted, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do if personally present, with full power of substitution or revocation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact, or such attorney-in-fact's substitute or substitutes, shall lawfully  do or cause to be done by virtue of this power of attorney and the rights and powers herein granted.  The undersigned acknowledges that the foregoing attorneys-in-fact, in serving in such capacity at the request of the undersigned, are not assuming, nor is the Company assuming, any of the undersigned's responsibilities to comply with section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

    This Power of Attorney shall remain in full force and effect until the undersigned is no longer required to file Form 4 and Form 5, with respect to the undersigned's holdings of and transactions in securities issued by the Company' unless earlier revoked by the undersigned in a signed writing delivered to the foregoing attorneys-in-fact.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Power of Attorney to be executed effective as of February 20, 2014.

/s/ Tina Pidgeon
Signature

Tina Pidgeon
Print Name

State of Alaska    )
Third Judicial District    ) ss.

The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 20th day of February, 2014 by Tina Pidgeon.

/s/ Tessa Holcomb
Notary Public in and for the State of Alaska

My commission expires: February 12, 2018

[SEAL]
```
Argued and submitted February 10,

affirmed March 11, 1998

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Javita Rivers, Claimant. Javita RIVERS, *Petitioner, v.*TRI-MET, INC., *Respondent.*

(95-01083; CA A97302)

951 P2d 1107

Donald E. Beer argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Popick & Merkel.

Travis L. Terrall argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before De Muniz, Presiding Judge, and Haselton and Linder, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *SAIF v. Walker,*145 Or App 294, 930 P2d 230 (1996), *rev allowed*325 Or 367 (1997).
§ 965.506 Surcharges for excess consumption of PHA-furnished utilities. ( a ) For dwelling units subject to allowances for PHA-furnished utilities where checkmeters have been installed, the PHA shall establish surcharges for utility consumption in excess of the allowances. Surcharges may be computed on a straight per unit of purchase basis (e.g., cents per kilowatt hour of electricity) or for stated blocks of excess consumption, and shall be based on the PHA's average utility rate. The basis for calculating such surcharges shall be described in the PHA's schedule of allowances. Changes in the dollar amounts of surcharges based directly on changes in the PHA's average utility rate shall not be subject to the advance notice requirements of this section.
( b ) For dwelling units served by PHA-furnished utilities where checkmeters have not been installed, the PHA shall establish schedules of surcharges indicating additional dollar amounts residents will be required to pay by reason of estimated utility consumption attributable to resident-owned major appliances or to optional functions of PHA-furnished equipment. Such surcharge schedules shall state the resident-owned equipment (or functions of PHA-furnished equipment) for which surcharges shall be made and the amounts of such charges, which shall be based on the cost to the PHA of the utility consumption estimated to be attributable to reasonable usage of such equipment.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- WorldWide Language Resources, Inc. Under Contract No. W52P1J-10-C-0047 APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 58637

Paul R. Moore, Esq.

Counsel Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney MAJ James P. Leary, JA CPT Vera A. Strebel, JA

Trial Attorneys ORDER OF DISMISSAL Appellant having advised the Board that they have reached a settlement, and appellant having moved that its appeal be dismissed with prejudice, and the government having advised that it has no objection, this appeal is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 1July 2015

ALEXANDERYO GER Administrative Judge / · - Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCANo. 58637, Appeal ofWorldWide Language Resources, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
#### §§ 401.13-401.18 [Reserved]
### §1598. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act July 22, 1954, ch. 558, §20(b), 68 Stat. 505, which related to compensation of the Government Secretary, department heads, and staffs of the Governor and Government Secretary, was superseded by section 10 of Pub. L. 90–496, Aug. 23, 1968, 82 Stat. 841, which amended section 1641 of this title. See Codification note set out under section 1641 of this title.
```

[114th Congress Public Law 290]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 130 STAT. 1496]]

Public Law 114-290
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
23323 Shelby Road in Shelby, Indiana, as the ``Richard Allen Cable Post 
            Office''. <<NOTE: Dec. 16, 2016 -  [H.R. 4887]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. RICHARD ALLEN CABLE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 23323 Shelby Road in Shelby, Indiana, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Richard Allen Cable Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Richard 
Allen Cable Post Office''.

    Approved December 16, 2016.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4887:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016):
            Sept. 20, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 5, considered and passed Senate; passage vitiated.
            Dec. 9, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JACOB LEE MUSIC,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-404

[September 6, 2017]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; James W. McCann, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 56-2014-CF-001992A.

Jacob Lee Music, DeFuniak Springs, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
PUBLIC LAW 114–246—NOV. 28, 2016 130 STAT. 995 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4511: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 114–663 (Comm. on House Administration). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

Sept. 6, considered and passed House. 

Nov. 15, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–246 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To amend the Veterans’ Oral History Project Act to allow the collection of video 

and audio recordings of biographical histories by immediate family members 

of members of the Armed Forces who died as a result of their service during 

a period of war. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gold Star Families Voices Act’’. 

SEC. 2. COLLECTION OF VIDEO AND AUDIO RECORDINGS OF 

BIOGRAPHICAL HISTORIES BY IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBERS OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES WHO DIED AS 

A RESULT OF THEIR SERVICE DURING A PERIOD OF WAR. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 3(a) of the Veterans’ 

Oral History Project Act (20 U.S.C. 2142(a)(1)) is amended to read 

as follows: 

‘‘(1) to collect video and audio recordings of— 

‘‘(A) personal histories and testimonials of veterans 

of the Armed Forces who served during a period of war; 

and 

‘‘(B) biographical histories by immediate family members of members of the Armed Forces who became missing 

in action or died as a result of their service during a 

period of war;’’. 

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 3 of the Veterans’ Oral 

History Project Act (20 U.S.C. 2142) is further amended by adding 

at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(d) DEFINITION OF IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBER.—For purposes 

of subsection (a), the term ‘immediate family member’ means a 

parent, spouse, sibling, or child.’’. 

Approved November 28, 2016. 

20 USC 2101 

note. 

Gold Star 

Families Voices 

Act. 

Nov. 28, 2016 

[H.R. 4511] 


kgrant on DSKB33CYQ1 with PUBLAW
#### § 285.803 How must I conduct my approved activities to protect essential fish habitats identified and described under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act?

You must comply with all measures required under 30 CFR 585.703.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3537 

To extend the boundary of the Hawai‘i Volcanoes National Park in the 

State of Hawaii. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2005 

Mr. CASE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Resources 

A BILL 

To extend the boundary of the Hawai‘i Volcanoes National 

Park in the State of Hawaii. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hawai‘i Volcanoes Na5 tional Park Expansion Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. HAWAI‘I VOLCANOES NATIONAL PARK BOUNDARY 

7 EXTENSION. 

8 The first section of the Act of June 20, 1938 (52 

9 Stat. 781, chapter 530; 16 U.S.C. 391b) is amended by 

10 adding at the end the following: 
2 

•HR 3537 IH 

1 ‘‘All of that certain parcel of land (being portion(s) 

2 of the land(s) described in and covered by Royal Patent 

3 Grant Number 2791 to C. C. Harris; Royal Patent Num4 ber 6454, Land Commission Award Number 9156, Apana 

5 1 to Kualaala; Royal Patent Grant Number 2787, Apana 

6 1 to W. C. Shipman; and all of Royal Patent Number 

7 5335, Land Commission Award Number 10514 to Naohe; 

8 Royal Patent Number 5925, Land Commission Award 

9 Number 8771 to Kila; Royal Patent Number 6452, Land 

10 Commission Award Number 11028–B, Apana 1 and 2 to 

11 Samuela Kuula; Royal Patent Number 6083, Land Com12 mission Award Number 10842, Apana 1 and 2 to Pau; 

13 Royal Patent Number 6622, Land Commission Award 

14 Number 8772, Apana 1 and 2 to Kaaloa; Royal Patent 

15 Number 5434, Land Commission Award Number 9157, 

16 Apana 1 and 2 to Keliikanakaole; Royal Patent Number 

17 (None), Land Commission Award Number 8110 to 

18 Hamohamo; Royal Patent Number 6475, Land Commis19 sion Award Number 9209 to Kemu) situate, lying and 

20 being at Kahuku, District of Ka’u, Island and County of 

21 Hawaii, State of Hawaii, being a portion of PARCEL 2, 

22 bearing Tax Key designation (3) 9–2–001–001 and con23 taining an area of 655.544 acres, more or less. 

24 ‘‘All of that certain parcel of land (being all of Apana 

25 3 of Royal Patent Number 6452, Land Commission 
3 

•HR 3537 IH 

1 Award Number 11028–B to Samuela Kuula) situate, lying 

2 and being at Kiao, District of Kau, Island and County 

3 of Hawaii, State of Hawaii, bearing Tax Key designation 

4 (3) 9–3–005–012 and containing an area of 1.300 acres, 

5 more or less.’’. 

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1680

MELVIN AUGUSTO MENDEZ-AGUILAR,

Petitioner,

v.

MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: January 24, 2019 Decided: January 30, 2019

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied in part, dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rachel L. Rado, THE LAW OFFICES OF RACHEL L. RADO, LLC, Boston, 

Massachusetts, for Petitioner. Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Anthony P. 

Nicastro, Assistant Director, Joanna L. Watson, Office of Immigration Litigation, 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Melvin Augusto Mendez-Aguilar, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for 

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal 

from the immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen and rescind his in 

absentia removal order. Mendez-Aguilar contends that the Board erred in affirming the 

IJ’s decision denying reopening and abused its discretion by declining to use its sua sponte 

authority to reopen proceedings. We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for 

review.

We find no reason to disturb the Board’s affirmance of the IJ’s decision denying 

reopening as the record establishes that Mendez-Aguilar received proper notice of the 

hearing. Accordingly, we deny in part the petition for review. We also dismiss in part the 

petition for review because we are without jurisdiction to review the Board’s decision not 

to sua sponte reopen proceedings. See Lawrence v. Lynch, 826 F.3d 198, 206 (4th Cir. 

2016). We also deny Mendez-Aguilar’s motion to supplement the record. See 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1252(b)(4)(a) (2012). 

Accordingly, we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review and deny 

the motion to supplement the record. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED IN PART,

DISMISSED IN PART
#### HECHT, Appellant, v. REIBLING, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

February 15, 1905.)

Action by Herman Hecht against Peter Reibling.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs.

HOOKER, J., not voting.
### §51901. Awards for individual acts or service

(a) General Authority.—The Secretary of Transportation may award decorations and medals of appropriate design (including ribbons, ribbon bars, emblems, rosettes, miniature facsimiles, plaques, citations, or other suitable devices or insignia) for individual acts or service in the merchant marine of the United States. The design may be similar to the design of a decoration or medal authorized for members of the armed forces for similar acts or service.

(b) Specific Authority.—The Secretary may award—

(1) a Merchant Marine Distinguished Service Medal to an individual for outstanding acts, conduct, or valor beyond the line of duty;

(2) a Merchant Marine Meritorious Service Medal to an individual for meritorious acts, conduct, or valor in the line of duty, but not of the outstanding character that would warrant the award of the Merchant Marine Distinguished Service Medal;

(3) a decoration or medal to an individual for service during a war, national emergency proclaimed by the President or Congress, or operations by the armed forces outside the continental United States under conditions of danger to life and property; and

(4) a decoration or medal to an individual for other acts or service of conspicuous gallantry, intrepidity, and extraordinary heroism under conditions of danger to life and property that would warrant a similar decoration or medal for a member of the armed forces.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(b), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1584.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 51901(a) | 46 App.:2001. | Pub. L. 100–324, §§2, 3, 5(d), May 30, 1988, 102 Stat. 576, 577. |
| | 46 App.:2004(d). | |
| 51901(b) | 46 App.:2002. | |

Section