alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CONFIDENTIAL
 Exhibit 10.165


*** Confidential Portion has been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment by the Company to, and the material has been separately filed with, the SEC. Each omitted Confidential Portion is marked by three Asterisks.





FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE FULL-TIME-TRANSPONDER CAPACITY AGREEMENT (PRE-LAUNCH)








This Fifth Amendment to the Full-Time Transponder Capacity Agreement (Pre-Launch) (the “Fifth Amendment”) is made and entered into as of this 30th day of September, 2008 by and between INTELSAT
CORPORATION, formerly known as PanAmSat Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Intelsat”), and GCI COMMUNICATION CORP., an Alaskan corporation (“Customer”).





RECITALS





WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Full-Time Transponder Capacity Agreement (Pre-Launch) dated as of March 31, 2006, as amended on February 15, 2008, April 9, 2008, and June 4, 2008, (collectively, the “Agreement”) between Intelsat and Customer, Intelsat is providing
Customer with *** (***) *** transponders and *** (***) *** transponders on Galaxy 18, and *** (***) *** transponder, *** (***) *** transponder on Horizons 1, and an additional *** (***) *** Transponder Segment on Horizons 1;





WHEREAS, Customer and Intelsat wish to amend the terms of the Agreement to extend the Capacity Term for the Additional *** Capacity;





AGREEMENT





NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the sufficiency and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:





1.
Except as specifically provided herein, all terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.





2.
Capacity Term.  The Capacity Term for the Additional *** Capacity shall continue until 23:59 Greenwich Mean Time on ***.





3.
Monthly Fee.  The Monthly Fee for the *** of Additional *** Capacity shall be US$***,*** per month.





4.
Except as specifically set forth in this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the amendment remain in full force and effect.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has duly executed and delivered this Third Amendment as of the day and year above written.








INTELSAT CORPORATION                                                                                                                          
 GCI COMMUNICATION CORP.





/s/ Patricia Casey


/s/ Jimmy R. SipesName: Patricia Casey


Name: Jimmy R. SipesTitle: Senior VP and Deputy General Counsel


Title: VP Network Services & Chief Engineer
§ 1219.515 How will ONRR update the group of “historical lease sites” and “applicable leased tracts (Phase II)” used for determining the allocation of shared revenues? ( a ) As GOMESA directs, ONRR will update the group of historical lease sites in the 2002-2007 Planning Area as follows: ( 1 ) On December 31, 2015, we will freeze the group of historical lease sites, subject to the adjustment under paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
( 2 ) Beginning January 1, 2022, and every fifth year thereafter, we will extend the ending date for determining the group of historical lease sites for an additional five calendar years by adding any new historical lease sites to the existing group.
( b ) Each year we will update the group of applicable leased tracts (Phase II) to include only leases that were in effect at any time during the previous fiscal year.
Submitted on record and briefs February 6,

reversed and remanded April 1, 1998

#### Anthony F. EDGERTON, *Appellant, v.*Ann Marie THOMPSON, an individual; MacLaren School for Boys; Superintendent, Robert Jester; State of Oregon and Oregon Children’s Services Division, *Respondents.*

(95C13882; CA A97717)

956 P2d 1068

Truman A. Stone and Meyer, Elzinga, Gannett & Stone, P.C. filed the brief for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Mary H. Williams, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondents.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Armstrong, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*368PER CURIAM

Defendants concede that the trial court applied an incorrect standard of proof in granting their motion for summary judgment. They also concede that, under the correct standard, material issues of fact may exist. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for farther proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.909 What is the Platform Verification Program?

The Platform Verification Program is the BSEE approval process for ensuring that floating platforms; platforms of a new or unique design; platforms in seismic areas; or platforms located in deepwater or frontier areas meet stringent requirements for design and construction. The program is applied during construction of new platforms and major modifications of, or repairs to, existing platforms. These requirements are in addition to the requirements of the Platform Approval Program described in §§ 250.904 through 250.908 of this subpart.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Owen Vest, Appellant.

Motion granted and time for argument of appeal enlarged to include September 1960 Term.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. ("Company") Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 ("Report"), the undersigned
certifies that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 19, 2010

By: /s/ Debi Kokinos
--------------------
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
### **[CHAPTER 225—REPEALED]**
Editorial Note on Part 3282
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3282 appear at 78 FR 60199, Oct. 1, 2013.

§ 3282.353 Submission format. States and private organizations that wish to act as primary inspection agencies shall submit to the Administrator, Office of Manufactured Housing Programs, Office of Housing, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW., Washington, DC 20410, an application that includes the following: ( a ) A cover sheet which shall show the following: ( 1 ) Name and address of the party making the application;
( 2 ) The capacity (DAPIA, IPIA) in which the party wishes to be approved to act;
( 3 ) A list of the key personnel who will perform the various functions required under these regulations;
( 4 ) The number of manufactured home manufacturers and manufacturing plants for which the submitting party proposes to act in each of the capacities for which it wishes to be approved to act;
( 5 ) The estimated total number of manufactured homes produced by those manufacturers and in those plants per year;
( 6 ) The number of years the proposed primary inspection agency has been actively engaged in the enforcement of manufactured home standards; and
( 7 ) A certification by the party applying that it will follow the Federal manufactured home construction and safety standards set out at 24 CFR part 3280 and any interpretations of those standards which may be made by the Secretary.
( b ) A detailed schedule of fees to be charged broken down by the services for which they will be charged.
( c ) A detailed description of how the submitting party intends to carry out all of the functions for which it wishes to be approved under this subpart, with appropriate cross-references to sections of this subpart, including examples and complete descriptions of all reports, tests, and evaluations which the party would be required to make. Where appropriate, later sections of this subpart identify particular items which must be included in the submission. The Secretary may request further detailed information, when appropriate.
( d ) A party wishing to be approved as a DAPIA shall submit a copy of a manufactured home design that it has approved (or if it has not approved a design, one that it has evaluated and a deviation report showing where the design is not in conformance with the standards) and a copy of a quality assurance manual that it has approved (or if it was not approved a manual, one that it has evaluated and a deviation report showing where the manual is inadequate).
( e ) A party wishing to be approved as an IPIA shall submit a copy of a certification report which it has prepared for a manufactured home plant or, if it has not prepared such a report, an evaluation of a manufacturing plant which it has inspected with a description of what changes shall be made before a certification report can be issued. A party that has not previously inspected manufactured homes may nevertheless be accepted on the basis of the qualifications of its personnel and its commitment to perform the required functions.
[41 FR 19852, May 13, 1976, as amended at 61 FR 10861, Mar. 15, 1996; 78 FR 60199, Oct. 1, 2013]
### SUBCHAPTER II—NATIONAL AVIATION NOISE POLICY
Exhibit
23.2




CONSENT
OF REGISTERED INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




ClearPoint
Business Resources, Inc.




We hereby
consent to the incorporation in the Company’s previously filed Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-144209 filed June 29, 2007) and Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-122439 filed June 29, 2007) of our report dated
April 15, 2008 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the related
financial statement schedule of ClearPoint Business Resources, Inc. and
Subsidiaries included in this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007.





/s/ Lazar Levine & Felix
      LLPLAZAR
      LEVINE & FELIX LLPMorristown,
      New JerseyApril
      15, 2009
#### Phyllis Tomei, Respondent, v Pasquale Tomei, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[834 NYS2d 781]-

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Ann Marie Taddeo, J.), entered February 22, 2006. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted that part of plaintiffs motion to correct and resettle the judgment of divorce to include an oral stipulation of settlement with respect to defendant’s pension benefits.

It is hereby ordered that the order insofar as appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is denied in part, and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Monroe County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: In connection with the action of divorce commenced by plaintiff in 1994, the parties placed an oral stipulation of settlement on the record in 1996 that, inter alia, provided for the distribution of the marital property, including defendant’s pension benefits. Neither party executed the stipulation. Two years later, Supreme Court issued a judgment of divorce and a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO), dividing defendant’s pension benefits pursuant to the formula set forth in *Majauskas v Majauskas*(61 NY2d 481 [1984]). The record does not indicate that the *1150QDRO was served on defendant or that it was filed at that time. When the QDRO was filed with the pension plan administrator in 2002, it was rejected as nonqualifying. By the order in appeal No. 1, the court granted plaintiffs motion to correct and resettle the judgment of divorce and, by the order in appeal No. 2, the court granted plaintiffs motion to amend the QDRO and denied defendant’s cross motion to vacate the QDRO. By the amended order in appeal No. 3, the court issued an amended QDRO that made an upward adjustment of plaintiffs monthly payments for a period of 64 months as the result of pension benefit overpayments to defendant.

We note at the outset that, as limited by their briefs, the parties address only the propriety of the stipulation of settlement with respect to defendant’s pension benefits, and thus we in turn address only the validity of that part of the stipulation of settlement. Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (3) provides that “[a]n agreement by the parties, made before or during the marriage, shall be valid and enforceable in a matrimonial action if such agreement is in writing, subscribed by the parties, and acknowledged or proven in the manner required to entitle a deed to be recorded.” Because the unacknowledged oral stipulation of the parties failed to meet the statutory requirements, it was ineffective with respect to the pension benefits, and the court thus was required to distribute them *(see*§ 236 [B] [5] [a]). Because that did not occur, we reverse the order insofar as appealed from in appeal No. 1, deny plaintiffs motion in part, and remit the matter to Supreme Court for distribution of defendant’s pension benefits *(see Hanford v Hanford,*91 AD2d 829, 830 [1982]; *Giambattista v Giambattista,*89 AD2d 1057, 1058 [1982]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Martoche, Smith, Fahey and Green, JJ.
_______________________________________ __ ___________________ ________________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

October 25, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh 132257 (22) Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. C. PEPPER MOORE, #100885 Stephen J. Markman, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 132257 CoA: 269883 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Defendant-Appellee.

On order of the Chief Ju stice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it is DENIED because MCL 600. 2963; MSA 27A.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable for filing fees. Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $5.00, shall submit a copy of this order with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being filed in this Court. If plaintiff timely files the partia l fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of the deposits made to plain tiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of $370.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file furth er appeals in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. The Clerk of the Court sh all furnish two copies of th is order to plaintiff and return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.

jm I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 25, 2006
Clerk
Exhibit 99.2



                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Consolidated Freightways Corporation (the "Company") for the
period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Stephen Sokol, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report complies fully with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
     as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and results
     of operations of the Company.


/s/Stephen Sokol
Stephen Sokol
Chief Financial Officer
September 3, 2002
### §14907. Recordkeeping and reporting violations

A person required to make a report to the Secretary or the Board, as applicable, answer a question, or make, prepare, or preserve a record under this part about transportation subject to jurisdiction under subchapter I or III of chapter 135, or an officer, agent, or employee of that person, that—

(1) does not make that report;

(2) does not specifically, completely, and truthfully answer that question in 30 days from the date the Secretary or Board, as applicable, requires the question to be answered;

(3) does not make, prepare, or preserve that record in the form and manner prescribed;

(4) falsifies, destroys, mutilates, or changes that report or record;

(5) files a false report or record;

(6) makes a false or incomplete entry in that record about a business related fact or transaction; or

(7) makes, prepares, or preserves a record in violation of an applicable regulation or order of the Secretary or Board;

is liable to the United States for a civil penalty of not more than $5,000.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §103, Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 916.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 11909 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.760 What are the snubbing requirements? ( a ) For snubbing operations, you must follow the applicable requirements of this subpart and have the following minimum BOP-system components: ( 1 ) One set of pipe rams hydraulically operated,
( 2 ) Two sets of stripper-type pipe rams hydraulically operated with spacer spool,
( 3 ) An inside BOP or a spring-loaded, back-pressure safety valve in the open position located on the rig floor, and
( 4 ) An essentially full-opening, work-string safety valve in the open position must be maintained on the rig floor at all times and a wrench to fit the work-string safety valve must be readily available.
( 5 ) Proper connections must be readily available for inserting valves in the work string.
( b ) Test the snubbing unit in accordance with § 250.737(a), (b), and
( c ) .
[84 FR 21984, May 15, 2019]
----

| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of General Communication, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2010; and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   Date: October 6, 2011 |  /s/ John M. Lowber                                                |
|-----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              | John M. Lowber                                                          |
|                              | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer |

| 1 | Paragraph 3 is omitted since no financial statements are included in the amended filing.  Paragraphs 4 and 5 are omitted since the amendment does not contain an amendment to the Regulation S-K Item 307 and 308 disclosures regarding the evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting. |
|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
§ 700.120 Eligible supportive services. ( a ) Supportive services or funding for such services may be provided by state, local, public or private providers and CHSP funds. A CHSP under this section shall provide meal and other qualifying services for program participants (and other residents and nonresidents, as described in § 700.125(a)) that are coordinated on site.
( b ) Qualifying supportive services are those listed in section 802(k)(16) and in section 700.105.
( c ) Meal services shall meet the following guidelines: ( 1 ) *Type of service.* At least one meal a day must be served in a group setting for some or all of the participants; if more than one meal a day is provided, a combination of a group setting and carry-out meals may be utilized.
( 2 ) *Hot meals.* At least one meal a day must be hot. A hot meal for the purpose of this program is one in which the principal food item is hot at the time of serving.
( 3 ) *Special menus.* Grantees shall provide special menus as necessary for meeting the dietary needs arising from the health requirements of conditions such as diabetes and hypertension. Grantees should attempt to meet the dietary needs of varying religious and ethnic backgrounds.
( 4 ) *Meal service standards.* Grantees shall plan for and provide meals which are wholesome, nutritious, and each of which meets a minimum of one-third of the minimum daily dietary allowances as established by the Food and Nutrition Board of the National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council (or State or local standards, if these standards are higher). Grantees must have an annual certification, prepared and signed by a registered dietitian, which states that each meal provided under CHSP meets the minimum daily dietary allowances.
( 5 ) *Food stamps and agricultural commodities.* In providing meal services grantees must apply for and use food stamps and agricultural commodities as set forth in section 802(d)(2)(A).
( 6 ) *Preference for nutrition providers:* In contracting for or otherwise providing for meal services grantees must follow the requirements of section 802(d)(2)(B). These requirements do not preclude a grantee or owner from directly preparing and providing meals under its own auspices.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lonnie H. Hamilton, Appellant.

Motion for leave to dispense with printing granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers (including the typed minutes) and on a typewritten brief. The appellant is directed to file five copies of his brief and to serve one copy. The appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is *953enlarged to the January 1961 Term, for which term the appeal is ordered to be placed on the calendar. Motion for assignment of counsel granted. William W. Kleinman, Esq., 66 Court Street, Brooklyn 1, New York, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal. Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur; Beldoek, J., dissents and votes to deny the motion, with the following memorandum: Prom the papers submitted it affirmatively appears as matter of law that there is no merit in the appeal, since the issues now raised could have been raised on an appeal by defendant from the judgment of conviction.