alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF WEIDER NUTRITION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AS OF,
AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDING FEBRUARY 28, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                           2,278
<SECURITIES>                                    64,126
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,813
<ALLOWANCES>                                    74,172
<INVENTORY>                                    148,048
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,722
<PP&E>                                          15,734
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,692
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 270,572
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          163,470
<BONDS>                                          5,365
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           249
<OTHER-SE>                                      98,944
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   270,572
<SALES>                                        240,250
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               240,250
<CGS>                                          154,869
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  154,869
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                83,832
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,197
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,643)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,317)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,326)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,326)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)
                                               

</TABLE>
§ 556.517 What may I do if my high bid is rejected? ( a ) The decision of the authorized officer on bids is the final action of the Department, subject only to reconsideration of the rejection of the high bid by the Director, in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) Within 15 days of bid rejection, you may file a written request for reconsideration with the Director, with a copy to the authorized officer. Such request must provide evidence as to why the Director should reconsider your bid. You will receive a written response either affirming or reversing the rejection of your bid.
( c ) The Director's decision on the request for reconsideration is not subject to appeal to the Interior Board of Land Appeals in the Department's Office of Hearings and Appeals.
### SUBCHAPTER III—LIMITATIONS
#### § 56.19022 Initial measurement.

After initial rope stretch but before visible wear occurs, the rope diameter of newly installed wire ropes shall be measured at least once in every third interval of active length and the measurements averaged to establish a baseline for subsequent measurements. A record of the measurements and the date shall be made by the person taking the measurements. This record shall be retained until the rope is retired from service.

[50 FR 4054, Jan. 29, 1985, as amended at 60 FR 33723, June 29, 1995]
Exhibit 32.2



18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification



In connection with the Annual Report of NGP Capital Resources Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard A. Bernardy, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|             |  |                                                                      
|------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|May 16, 2005 |  | /s/    RICHARD A.
BERNARDY                                           
|             |  | Richard A. Bernardy, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
|            



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NGP Capital Resources Company and will be retained by NGP Capital Resources Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Fred G. Heydt Construction Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Barney Uydess et al., Appellants.

Order, entered March 2, 1962, granting plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend the *ad damnum*clause of the first cause of action in its complaint by adding a claim to punitive damages, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants, and the motion denied, with leave to renew upon submission of a satisfactory affidavit of merits. The first cause of action, sounding in fraud, sought damages in the sum of $11,858.67. Some three years after joinder of issue, and when the ease had been reached for trial and assigned to a Trial Part, *907plaintiff sought to add $100,000 to its claim by way of punitive damages. In so moving, plaintiff relied on *Walker*v. *Sheldon*(10 N Y 2d 401), which on the facts asserted in the complaint authorized the imposition of such damages on “those who deliberately and coolly engage in a far-flung fraudulent scheme, systematically conducted for profit” (p. 406). To bring the defendants within the ambit of that decision, plaintiff’s proposed amendment merely asserts in the *ad damnum*clause the existence of a “virtually immoral and larcenous scheme of these defendants to trap generally the unwary ” — an adaptation of language which the Court of Appeals quoted with approval from this court’s memorandum (12 A D 2d 456). But the factual allegations of the complaint, drawn long before *Walker*v. *Sheldon*was decided, remain unchanged, nor does plaintiff make any showing of merits to justify its proposal, at this belated stage, of an eight-fold increase of the *ad damnum*clause under the doctrine it seeks to invoke. In seeking leave to plead in such general and conelusory form the requirement of a comprehensive affidavit of merits, setting forth fully the evidence warranting the imposition of punitive damages, becomes especially imperative. If, on renewal, plaintiff’s motion should be granted, we may add that it seems but fair to allow defendants a further pretrial examination. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1728 To what depth must I remove a platform or other facility? ( a ) Unless the Regional Supervisor approves an alternate depth under paragraph (b) of this section, you must remove all platforms and other facilities (including templates and pilings) to at least 15 feet below the mud line.
( b ) The Regional Supervisor may approve an alternate removal depth if: ( 1 ) The remaining structure would not become an obstruction to other users of the seafloor or area, and geotechnical and other information you provide demonstrate that erosional processes capable of exposing the obstructions are not expected; or
( 2 ) You determine, and BSEE concurs, that you must use divers and the seafloor sediment stability poses safety concerns; or
( 3 ) The water depth is greater than 800 meters (2,624 feet).
§ 556.1100 How does a lease expire? ( a ) Your oil and gas lease will automatically expire at the end of its primary term unless you have taken action, as set forth in § 556.601, to maintain the lease beyond the primary term.
( b ) Your sulfur lease will automatically expire at the end of its primary term unless you have taken action, as set forth in § 556.603, to maintain the lease beyond the primary term.
### §865. Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §39, 62 Stat. 992

Section, acts Mar. 2, 1917, ch. 145, §43, 39 Stat. 966; Feb. 13, 1925, ch. 229, §13, 43 Stat. 942; Jan. 31, 1928, ch. 14, §1, 45 Stat. 54, related to writs of error and appeals. See section 1294 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Sept. 1, 1948, see section 38 of act June 25, 1948, set out as an Effective Date note preceding section 1 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9395 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to provide to Congress a briefing on 

any instance of an attempted breach of certain military installations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 23, 2024 

Mr. ARRINGTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to provide to Congress 

a briefing on any instance of an attempted breach of 

certain military installations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BRIEFING ON INSTANCES OF ATTEMPTED 

4 BREACHES OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

5 MILITARY INSTALLATIONS REQUIRED. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

7 provide to Congress a briefing on any instance of an at8 tempted breach of a military installation under the juris9 diction of the Department of Defense during the period 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9395 IH

1 beginning on January 1, 2021, and ending on the date 

2 of the provision of such briefing. 

3 (b) ELEMENTS.—Each briefing under subsection 

4 shall include, with respect to each perpetrator of an at5 tempted breach described in such subsection, a statement 

6 of the applicable immigration status and citizenship sta7 tus. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
§ 56.14111 Slusher, backlash guards and securing. ( a ) When persons are exposed to slushing operations, the slushers shall be equipped with rollers and drum covers and anchored securely before slushing operations are started.
( b ) Slushers rated over 10 horsepower shall be equipped with backlash guards, unless the equipment operator is otherwise protected.
( c ) This standard does not apply to air tuggers of 10 horsepower or less that have only one cable and one drum.
§ 553.29 How can I use insurance as OSFR evidence? ( a ) If you use insurance to satisfy all or part of your obligation to demonstrate OSFR, you may use only insurance certificates issued by insurers that have achieved a “Secure” rating for claims paying ability in their latest review by A.M. Best's Insurance Reports, Standard & Poor's Insurance Rating Services, or other equivalent rating made by a rating service acceptable to BOEM.
( b ) You must submit information about your insurers to BOEM on a completed and unaltered Form BOEM-1019. The information you submit must: ( 1 ) Include all the information required by § 553.41 and
( 2 ) Be executed on one original insurance certificate (*i.e.,* Form BOEM-1019) for each OSFR layer (see paragraph (c) of this section), showing all participating insurers and their proportion (quota share) of this risk. The certificate must bear the original signatures of each insurer's underwriter or of their lead underwriters, underwriting managers, or delegated brokers, depending on who is authorized to bind the underwriter.
( 3 ) For each insurance company on the insurance certificate, indicate the insurer's claims-paying-ability rating and the rating service that issued the rating.
( c ) The insurance evidence you provide to BOEM as OSFR evidence may be divided into layers, subject to the following restrictions: ( 1 ) The total amount of OSFR evidence must equal the total amount you must demonstrate under § 553.13;
( 2 ) No more than one insurance certificate may be used to cover each OSFR layer specified in § 553.13(b) (*i.e.,* four layers for an OCS COF, and five layers for a non-OCS COF);
( 3 ) You may use one insurance certificate to cover any number of consecutive OSFR layers;
( 4 ) Each insurer's participation in the covered insurance risk must be on a proportional (quota share) basis, must be expressed as a percentage of a whole layer, and the certificate must not contain intermediate, horizontal layers;
( 5 ) You may use an insurance deductible. If you use more than one insurance certificate, the deductible amount must apply only to the certificate that covers the base OSFR amount layer. To satisfy an insurance deductible, you may use only those methods that are acceptable as evidence of OSFR under this part; and
( 6 ) You must identify a U.S. agent for service of process on each insurance certificate you submit to BOEM. The agent may be different for each insurance certificate.
( d ) You may submit to BOEM a temporary insurance confirmation (fax binder) for each insurance certificate you use as OSFR evidence. Submit your fax binder on Form BOEM-1019, and each form must include the signature of an underwriter for at least one of the participating insurers. BOEM will accept your fax binder as OSFR evidence during a period that ends 90 days after the date that you need the insurance to demonstrate OSFR.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS /’ 

AUSTIN 

ur. L Il. rwu.ff, .ir. 

cofnlty A~torncy 

Dickens County 

spur, Tesfs 

Dear Sir, 

ea OiTil etatn- s,%w& 

of pear letter of 

18 $ttot% as iollOlrs~ 

I hara beeu 

t to you the folIoping 

*ithat is the rsaaning of the temne *actual valne* iutcl *nctual cash vsXue* as used fa 

the abo7e stat.nteT 

l fiw do you arrive nt the aaotual rsl~e* 

or *aotual oat& value* of a share mmtionad 

221 saidarticI.et 
nr. L. 1). Ratliff, Jr., June 13, 1939, Page 2 

*I)0 the teius 'actual value and *actual 

cash value* as used in the above statute have 

reference to the mount which a share would 

bring en the open market or does such statute 

ana the terms therein uacd have reference to 

what is termed the 'book value', arrived at 

by the nethod set out In 6 Texss Jurlsprudeoce, 

pages 347 and 343, paragraph 266~~ 

The 6bji?Ct of Article 7165 of the Revised Civil 

Stotutes of Texas of W25 is to furnish the data by which 

to w-rive at the proper valuation of shares of stock. 6 

tex. Jur. 348. 

ArtlcleT16&& C= 6. OS Ter*8, prorides*r t&e 

ienaering OS real estate heldby the bauk, and~tb%n~pr%ridec Far 

theretditlonof~ttharesof at0aP by the*mhWl&~, 8Mt.be 

same shall be rend@red at afhelr aatttal ralae*. 

We believ% that when the oorreot a-mater has been made 

to the following proposition, the whole of the repmtaule by 

you will be auswre& Th% question being* 

-Do the tenas'aotm~I value'aud ?aotual 

tnwzit value* as used ltt the above statute ham9 

reference to thtanount~hleha slifbre.wiild 

brIngon t&eopemumrket?" 

TJxb queatiott ha81 beem d5reotly at&red 

Court of the United 6tates. 

by the 3upretae~ 

whereluthec%urtmald~ 

*The phrases tsal8ble valmP, Qtotual 

value*, *cash value*, tutd others tteed ip 

the directlone to assesdng Wfiaers, all 

mean the same thing, andare deeigaed to 

%fTeot the same purpos%.* 

Cammia@ v. Ycrohants Nat91 Bank of Toledo, ml U.S.p. 

The Saprem% Court of Alabama in the ease of State v. 

Foodward, founcl in 93 SO- p. 826, mak%% the fOllOlrin& Statemntt 

*Cash ralae, that 1% whut the property 

would Sell for (for) cash by a vendor; why 

wanted t.a e%ll, purchased by the purobaser 

who wata2d to purchase the property for a 

c a sh o o nsid%r a tio n. l 
I 

Mr. L. 1). RatlilY, Jr., June 13, 1sms Page 3 

This court further states: *Tbc actual cash value, 

then, Is the fair or reasonable cash price for which the property czn Ix? sold in the narket.. 1 Words and Phrases p.152, 

citing nw:emus cases, among thezr, Binninghaz FWc Ins. Co. 

y. Tol.livt?r, 18 pi. E. 304. 

l Tbc expression tactual value*, *market 

value* and *market price* when applied to any 

article noans the sum thing. They mean the 

price or value of the artfcle cstabllshccl or 

shown by sale, public ur private, In the way 

of orainq baainesa a 

Sacmnento Soathetn Xy. T. Xcilbtwn, 104 Pac,819. 

vite best test .oi acsual value is a ttale 

on the market under o%raaamtameee calailatdl 

to eudt ml curd free biddinl: 73y lntersrited 

ptIrehasenr* 

Francis T. NIllion, 80 6-U. 486, by the Suprem 

court of Kentacky*
#### § 1210.350 Definitions.

Terms used in this subpart shall have the same meaning as in § 1206.351 of this chapter.
#### 2-4 Amsterdam Avenue Corp. v. Murray Fabricant.

Motion for reargument and for a stay denied, with $10 costs. Concur—Rabin, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Bergan, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3548 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 344
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3548

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2005

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                           December 16, 2005

               Reported by Ms. Collins, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 on Franklin Avenue in Pearl River, New York, as the ``Heinz Ahlmeyer, 
                      Jr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located on 
Franklin Avenue in Pearl River, New York, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Heinz Ahlmeyer, Jr. Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Heinz Ahlmeyer, Jr. Post 
Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 344

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3548

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 on Franklin Avenue in Pearl River, New York, as the ``Heinz Ahlmeyer, 
                      Jr. Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           December 16, 2005

                       Reported without amendment
```
§ 964.300 General. The Family Investment Centers Program provides families living in public housing with better access to educational and employment opportunities by: ( a ) Developing facilities in or near public housing for training and support services;
( b ) Mobilizing public and private resources to expand and improve the delivery of such services;
( c ) Providing funding for such essential training and support services that cannot otherwise be funded; and
( d ) Improving the capacity of management to assess the training and service needs of families, coordinate the provision of training and services that meet such needs, and ensure the long-term provision of such training and services. FIC provides funding to HAs to access educational, housing, or other social service programs to assist public housing residents toward self-sufficiency.
#### Gramatan Home Investors Corp., Respondent, v Claude Williams et al., Appellants.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered July 21, 1977, affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements (see Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law, § 713). Shapiro, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.1019 Relinquishment of pipeline right-of-way grants.

A right-of-way grant or a portion thereof may be surrendered by the holder by filing a written relinquishment in triplicate with the Regional Supervisor. It must contain those items addressed in §§ 250.1751 and 250.1752 of this part. A relinquishment shall take effect on the date it is filed subject to the satisfaction of all outstanding debts, fees, or fines and the requirements in § 250.1010(h) of this part.
```

[114th Congress Public Law 275]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 130 STAT. 1405]]

Public Law 114-275
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To require limitations on prescribed burns. <<NOTE: Dec. 14, 2016 -  [S. 
                                3395]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Prescribed Burn 
Approval Act of 2016.>> 
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 16 USC 551 note.>>  SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prescribed Burn Approval Act of 
2016''.
SEC. 2. <<NOTE: 16 USC 551c-1 note.>> DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) National fire danger rating system.--The term ``national 
        fire danger rating system'' means the national system used to 
        provide a measure of fire danger according to a range of low to 
        moderate to high to very high to extreme.
            (2) Prescribed burn.--The term ``prescribed burn'' means a 
        planned fire intentionally ignited.
            (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of Agriculture, acting through the Chief of the Forest Service.
SEC. 3. <<NOTE: 16 USC 551c-1.>> LIMITATIONS ON PRESCRIBED BURNS.

    (a) In General.--Except as provided in subsection (b), the Secretary 
shall not authorize a prescribed burn on Forest Service land if, for the 
county or contiguous county in which the land is located, the national 
fire danger rating system indicates an extreme fire danger level.
    (b) <<NOTE: Coordination.>>  Exception.--The Secretary may authorize 
a prescribed burn under a condition described in subsection (a) if the 
Secretary coordinates with the applicable State government and local 
fire officials.

    (c) Report.--At the end of each fiscal year, the Secretary shall 
submit to Congress a report describing--
            (1) the number and locations of prescribed burns during that 
        fiscal year; and

[[Page 130 STAT. 1406]]

            (2) each prescribed burn during that fiscal year that was 
        authorized by the Secretary pursuant to subsection (b).

    Approved December 14, 2016.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 3395:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016):
            Nov. 17, considered and passed Senate.
            Dec. 5, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```