alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                           |             | Exhibit 99(a) 
|------------------------------------------ | ----------- | --------------
|HSBC Finance Corporation                   |             |               
|Household Automotive Trust, Series  2004-1 |             |               
|                                           |             |               
|                                           |             |               
|Original Principal                         |             |               
|Class A-1                                  | 225,000,000 |               
|Class A-2                                  | 179,000,000 |               
|Class A-3                                  | 190,000,000 |               
|Class A-4                                  | 156,000,000 |               
|Number of Bonds (000's)                    |             |               
|Class A-1                                  | 225,000     |               
|Class A-2                                  | 179,000     |               
|Class A-3                                  | 190,000     |               
|Class A-4                                  | 156,000     |               
|                                           |             |               
|                                           |             |               
|                                           |             | 2004 Total    
|                                           |             |               
|                                           |             |               
|CLASS A                                    |             |               
|Class A-1 Principal Distribution           |             | 164,892,219.69
|Class A-1 Interest Distribution            |             | 1,139,086.23  
|                                           |             |               
|Class A-2 Principal Distribution           |             | 0.00          
|Class A-2 Interest Distribution            |             | 1,741,670.00  
|                                           |             |               
|Class A-3 Principal Distribution           |             | 0.00          
|Class A-3 Interest Distribution            |             | 2,420,916.67  
|                                           |             |               
|Class A-4 Principal Distribution           |             | 0.00          
|Class A-4 Interest Distribution            |             | 2,367,170.00
§ 56.3203 Rock fixtures. ( a ) For rock bolts and accessories addressed in ASTM F432-95, “Standard Specification for Roof and Rock Bolts and Accessories,” the mine operator shall— ( 1 ) Obtain a manufacturer's certification that the material was manufactured and tested in accordance with the specifications of ASTM F432-95; and
( 2 ) Make this certification available to an authorized representative of the Secretary and to the representative of miners.
( b ) Fixtures and accessories not addressed in ASTM F432-95 may be used for ground support provided they— ( 1 ) Have been successful in supporting the ground in an area with similar strata, opening dimensions and ground stresses in any mine; or
( 2 ) Have been tested and shown to be effective in supporting ground in an area of the affected mine which has similar strata, opening dimensions, and ground stresses as the area where the fixtures are expected to be used. During the test process, access to the test area shall be limited to persons necessary to conduct the test.
( c ) Bearing plates shall be used with fixtures when necessary for effective ground support.
( d ) The diameter of finishing bits shall be within a tolerance of plus or minus 0.030 inch of the manufacturer's recommended hole diameter for the anchor used. When separate finishing bits are used, they shall be distinguishable from other bits.
( e ) Damaged or deteriorated cartridges of grouting material shall not be used.
( f ) When rock bolts tensioned by torquing are used as a means of ground support, ( 1 ) Selected tension level shall be— ( i ) At least 50 percent of either the yield point of the bolt or anchorage capacity of the rock, whichever is less; and
( ii ) No greater than the yield point of the bolt or anchorage capacity of the rock.
( 2 ) The torque of the first bolt, every tenth bolt, and the last bolt installed in each work area during the shift shall be accurately determined immediately after installation. If the torque of any fixture tested does not fall within the installation torque range, corrective action shall be taken.
( g ) When grouted fixtures can be tested by applying torque, the first fixture installed in each work place shall be tested to withstand 150 foot-pounds of torque. Should it rotate in the hole, a second fixture shall be tested in the same manner. If the second fixture also turns, corrective action shall be taken.
( h ) When other tensioned and nontensioned fixtures are used, test methods shall be established to verify their effectiveness.
( i ) The mine operator shall certify that tests were conducted and make the certification available to an authorized representative of the Secretary.
[51 FR 36197, Oct. 8, 1986, as amended at 51 FR 36804, Oct. 16, 1986; 63 FR 20030, Apr. 22, 1998]
#### § 1.2 Description.

The emblem of the Mine Safety and Health Administration is of contemporary design with the letters and acronym of the Administration delineated as MSHA appearing in large letters in the middle of the emblem. Above the letters and acronym appear the words “United States Department of Labor” and below the letters and acronym appear the words “Mine Safety and Health Administration.”

[39 FR 23997, June 28, 1974, as amended at 43 FR 12312, Mar. 24, 1978]
AUTHORIZATION

        Know all by these presents, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and
appoints each of John M. Lowber, Bonnie J. Paskvan, and Alfred J. Walker,
signing singly, the undersigned's true and lawful attorney-in-fact to:

(1) execute for and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned's capacity
as an affiliate of General Communication, Inc. (the "Company"), Form 4, in
accordance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
rules thereunder;

(2) do and perform any and all acts for and on behalf of the undersigned which
may be necessary or desirable to complete and execute any such Form 4, complete
and execute any amendment or amendments thereto, and timely file such form with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any stock exchange or
similar authority; and

(3) take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the
foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit to,
in the best interest of, or legally required by, the undersigned, it being
understood that the documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on behalf of the
undersigned pursuant to this Power of Attorney shall be in such form and shall
contain such terms and conditions as such attorney-in-fact may approve in such
attorney-in-fact's discretion.

        The undersigned hereby grants to each such attorney-in-fact full power
and authority to do and perform any and every act and thing whatsoever
requisite, necessary, or proper to be done in the exercise of any of the rights
and powers herein granted, as fully to all intents and purposes as the
undersigned might or could do if personally present, with full power of
substitution or revocation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such
attorney-in-fact, or such attorney-in-fact's substitute or substitutes, shall
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this power of attorney and the
rights and powers herein granted. The undersigned acknowledges that the
foregoing attorneys-in-fact, in serving in such capacity at the request of the
undersigned, are not assuming, nor is the Company assuming, any of the
undersigned's responsibilities to comply with Section 16 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.

        This Power of Attorney shall remain in full force and effect until the
undersigned is no longer required to file Form 4, with respect to the
undersigned's holdings of and transactions in securities issued by the Company,
unless earlier revoked by the undersigned in a signed writing delivered to the
foregoing attorneys-in-fact.


                                   1
<PAGE>
        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Power of Attorney to
be executed as of this 4th day of April 2003.


                                 /s/
                                 ------------------------
                                 Signature


                                 Richard Westlund
                                 ------------------------
                                 Print Name
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**SECURITIES EXCHANGEACT RULES 13a-15(e), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT**

**TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Hugh Martin, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Dated: March 23, 2011
EXHIBIT 31.4

                CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO15 U.S.C. 78M(A) OR 78O(D)
                 (SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


I, Keith Favreau, Chief Financial Officer certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Odd Job Stores, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

           a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

           b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

           c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and ;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

           a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

           b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


                                             /s/ Keith Favreau
Date: November 14, 2003                      ---------------------------------
                                             Keith Favreau
                                             Chief Financial Officer
### **CHAPTER 15—CONVEYANCE OF SUBMERGED LANDS TO TERRITORIES**

Sec.
1701 to 1703. Repealed.
1704.
Concurrent jurisdiction; exceptions for national defense purposes.
1705.
Tidelands, submerged lands, or filled lands.
1706.
Reserved rights.
1707.
Payment of rents, royalties, and fees to local government.
1708.
Discrimination prohibited in rights of access to, and benefits from, conveyed lands.
#### § 23.11 How approvals are granted.

All approvals are granted by official letter from MSHA. A device will be approved under this part only when the testing engineers have judged that it has met the requirements of the part and MSHA's records are complete, including drawings from the manufacturer that show the device as it is to be commercially made. Individual parts of devices will not be approved. No verbal reports of the investigation will be given and no informal approvals will be granted. As soon as the manufacturer has received the formal approval, he shall be free to advertise his device as permissible.

[Sched. 9B, 4 FR 1555, Apr. 11, 1939, as amended by Supp. 1, 20 FR 2975, May 4, 1955]
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Austin J. Boudreau. Ford Motor Company, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner of the State of New York, Respondent.

Motion by the Empire State Chamber of Commerce, Inc., to file a brief *amicus amia,*granted. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
PUBLIC LAW 115–4—FEB. 14, 2017 131 STAT. 9 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 41: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017): 

Feb. 1, considered and passed House. 

Feb. 2, 3, considered and passed Senate. 

DAILY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS (2017): 

Feb. 14, Presidential remarks. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–4 

115th Congress 

Joint Resolution 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States 

Code, of a rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating 

to ‘‘Disclosure of Payments by Resource Extraction Issuers’’. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress 

disapproves the rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange 

Commission relating to ‘‘Disclosure of Payments by Resource Extraction Issuers’’ (published at 81 Fed. Reg. 49359 (July 27, 2016)), 

and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Approved February 14, 2017. 

Feb. 14, 2017 

[H.J. Res. 41] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders

                                                                    Ending
Class            Interest             Principal    Losses           Balance
<S>               <C>                  <C>            <C>           <C>
A1               3916490.64      32877669.15                0        60104730.86
A2                 882849.4                0                0           17439000
A3                775676.25                0                0           15322000
A4                777093.75                0                0           15350000
A5                3260666.5      16279930.69                0         55195069.3
B1                289529.65            66978                0         5685022.01
B2                173707.74         40184.46                0         3410815.53
B3                115821.92         26793.52                0         2274206.47
B4                150553.42          34828.1                0         2956171.91
B5                 57936.13         13402.59                0         1137597.41
B6                 17376.97          4019.87                0          341203.12
B7                 23169.26          5359.83                0          454937.17
B8                 40546.46          9277.91                0          796143.82
PO1                       0         23976.43                0          251480.58
R                      0.57              100                0                  0
X1               1185528.77                0                0                  0
X2                590864.06                0                0                  0


</TABLE>
### §31147. Limitations on authority

(a) Traffic Regulations.—This subchapter does not authorize the Secretary of Transportation to prescribe traffic safety regulations or preempt State traffic regulations. However, the Secretary may prescribe traffic regulations to the extent their subject matter was regulated under parts 390–399 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, on October 30, 1984.

(b) Regulating the Manufacturing of Vehicles.—This subchapter does not authorize the Secretary to regulate the manufacture of commercial motor vehicles for any purpose, including fuel economy, safety, or emission control.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1013.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 31147(a) | 49 App.:2519(a). | Oct. 30, 1984, Pub. L. 98–554, §229, 98 Stat. 2853. |
| 31147(b) | 49 App.:2519(b). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the word "prescribe" is substituted for "establish or maintain" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS /’ **AUSTIN**

ur. L Il.rwu.ff, .ir. cofnltyA~torncy Dickens County spur, Tesfs Dear Sir,



# eaOiTiletatn- s,%w& of pear letter of 18 $ttot%as iollOlrs~

I hara beeu t to you the folIoping

*ithatis 

# thersaaningof the temne *actual valne* iutcl

*nctual cash vsXue* as used fa the abo7e stat.nteT l fiw do you arrive nt the 

### aaotual rsl~e* 

### or *aotual 

### oat& value* of a share mmtionad 221saidarticI.etnr. L. 1).Ratliff, Jr., June 13, 1939, Page 2

*I)0the teius 'actual value and *actual cash value* **as used**  **in** the **above statute**  **have** reference to the **mount** which a share would bring en the open market **or does**  **such statute**  ana the terms therein uacd have reference to what is termed the 'book value', arrived at by the nethod set **out In**  **6** Texss Jurlsprudeoce, pages 347 and 343, paragraph 266~~ The 6bji?Ct of Article 7165 of the Revised Civil Stotutes of Texas of W25 is to furnish the data by which to w-rive at the proper valuation of shares of stock. 6 tex. Jur. 348.

ArtlcleT16&& C= 6. **OS** Ter*8, prorides*r t&e ienaering OS real estate heldby **the** bauk, and~tb%n~pr%ridec Far theretditlonof~ttharesof at0aP by the*mhWl&~, 8Mt.be same shall **be** rend@red at afhelr aatttalralae*.

Webeliev% that when the oorreot a-materhas been made to the following **proposition, the**  **whole** of the repmtaule by 

### you will **be** 

### auswre& Th% questionbeing*

-Do the tenas'aotm~I value'aud ?aotual tnwzit value* as used lttthe above **statute** ham9 

### reference to thtanount~hleha slifbre.wiild brIngon t&eopemumrket?" TJxb queatiottha81beem d5reotly at&red Court of the United 6tates. by the 3upretae~ whereluthec%urtmald~ *The phrases tsal8ble valmP, Qtotual value*, *cash value*, tutdothers tteedip the directlone to **assesdng** Wfiaers, all mean the same thing, andare deeigaed to **%fTeot** the same purpos%.* Cammia@ v. Ycrohants Nat91 Bank of Toledo, ml U.S.p.

The Saprem% Court of Alabama in the ease of State v. Foodward, founclin 93 SO- p. 826, mak%% the fOllOlrin&Statemntt

*Cash ralae, that 1% whut the property would Sell for (for) cash by a vendor; why wanted t.ae%ll, purchased by the purobaser **who wata2d**  to purchase the property for a cash o onsid%ration. lI Mr. L. 1).RatlilY, Jr., June 13, 1sms Page 3

This court further states: *Tbc actual cash value, then, Is the fair or reasonable cash price for which the property czn Ix?sold in the narket.. 1 Words and Phrases p.152, citing nw:emus cases, among thezr,Binninghaz FWc Ins. Co. y. Tol.livt?r,

18 pi.E. 304. l Tbc expression tactual value*, *market 

### value* and *market price* when applied to any article noans the sum thing. They mean the price or value of the artfcle cstabllshcclor shown by sale, public ur private, In the way of orainq baainesa a Sacmnento Soathetn Xy. T. Xcilbtwn, 104 Pac,819. vite best test .oiacsual value is 

### a ttale 

### on themarket under o%raaamtameee calailatdl to eudt ml 

### curd freebiddinl:

73ylntersrited ptIrehasenr* Francis T. NIllion, 80 6-U. 486, by the Suprem court of Kentacky*