UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 98-4078 ELIZABETH JEAN WOOD MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-97-611) Submitted: June 23, 1998 Decided: July 23, 1998 Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________ Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL C. Rauch Wise, WISE & TUNSTALL, Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellant. J. Rene Josey, United States Attorney, William C. Lucius, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM:Elizabeth Wood Martinez pled guilty to conspiring to use fraudulent identification documents to make and utter counterfeit payroll checks, see18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 513 (1994), 18 U.S.C.A. § 1028 (West Supp. 1998). She appeals the 14-month sentence imposed on her, arguing that the district court clearly erred in finding that she was a manager or supervisor in the offense. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3B1.1(b) (1997). B ecause there was no evidence that Martinez managed or supervised another participant in the offense, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. John Wood, Martinez's brother, began making counterfeit payrollchecks on his computer in October 1996. Co-defendants Cindy Griffin and Robert Horne cashed twelve counterfeit payroll checks totaling $3702 with false driver's licenses and Social Security cards supplied by Wood, but ceased involvement after Horne was arrested in November 1996. Thereafter, John Wood created false Wal-Martpayroll checks which were cashed by Martinez and Ruby Wood (Martinez's mother) using false identification documents. Over the life of the conspiracy, 141 counterfeit checks worth $43,089 were cashed. In July 1997, John Wood and Martinez bought a computer store using,in part, proceeds of the check cashing scheme. Using the name Lorraine Swanson, Martinez acted as the store owner. She and John Wood also opened a bank account under false names. To receive a three-level adjustment as a manager or supervisor, adefendant must have managed or supervised at least one other participant in a criminal activity that involved at least five participants or was otherwise extensive. See USSG § 3B1.1, comment. (n.2). A participant is someone who is "criminally responsible" for the offense. See USSG § 3B1.1, comment. (n.1). A defendant's role in the offense is a factual question and we review the district court's determination
2for clear error. See United States v. Reavis , 48 F.3d 763, 768 (4th Cir.1995). The district court found that Martinez was a manager or supervisor for the reasons set forth in the presentence report, i.e., that Martinez had worked with her brother to obtain the computer equipmentnecessary to make the checks, rented the mini-warehouse, and purchased the computer store with her brother. Martinez asserted at sentencing that she had not rented the mini-warehouse. While Martinez was undoubtedly active in carrying out the scheme, the record is devoid of evidence that she managed or supervised any other participant in the offense.* Consequently, the district court'sfinding that Martinez was a manager or supervisor was clearly erroneous. We therefore vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing without the adjustment. We dispense with oral argument b ecause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED

_________________________________________________________________ *In her appeal brief, Martinez also argues that she did not manage any property for the conspiracy. However, only management or supervision of a person will trigger the adjustment. See United States v. Capers , 61 F.3d 1100, 1108-09 (4th Cir. 1995) (recognizing that 1993 amendment adding Application Note 2 made substantive change in this circuit's law).
3