alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(April 23, 1962)

#### Sarah Sanick, Appellant, v. Herman Schauder, Respondent.

Motion by appellant for reargument or for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, denied. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 09, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 09, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21I0160. JAMES CHARLES HARRIS et al. v. MARILYN MARTIN.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

19EV005153
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with  the  accompanying Quarterly Report of Radale Imports,
Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 (the
"Report"),  I,  Lee  D.  Dodson,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify  that  to  my  knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                                           /s/  Lee  D.  Dodson
Dated:  February  17,  2004                -------------------------------------
                                           Lee  D.  Dodson
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive  Officer


     The  above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the  Form  10-Q  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.




                                                                      Exhibit 32
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
Exhibit 31.2





CERTIFICATION





I, Richard Blass, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Delta Financial Corporation;





2.  Base on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, periods presented in this report;





4.  The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;







b.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and







c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and







5.  The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a. A ll significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information and





b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.











Date:August 16, 2004


Richard Blass


Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### William M. Cansdale, Appellant, v. Phyllis Rapp, Respondent.

Appeal dismissed unless records and briefs are filed and served on or before November 1, 1960. Respondent’s brief must be filed on or before November 17, 1960 if appeal is to be argued at November 1960 Term.
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________ No. 23

- 11446 Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus ANTONIO FRANCHESTER ORR,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 1:22

- cr
- 00247

- RDP

- NAD

- 1

____________________ USCA11 Case: 23-11446 Document: 24-1 Date Filed: 02/22/2024 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 23

- 11446

Before L AGOA , B RASHER , and A BUDU , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Alison Wallace, appointed counsel for Antonio Orr in thisdirect criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our in dependent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and O rr’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED

. USCA11 Case: 23-11446 Document: 24-1 Date Filed: 02/22/2024 Page: 2 of 2
### SUBCHAPTER I—ESTABLISHMENT AND ORGANIZATION OF OVERSIGHT BOARD
§ 20.11 Material required for MSHA records. In order that MSHA may know exactly what it has tested and approved, detailed records are kept covering each investigation. These include drawings and actual equipment, as follows: ( a ) *Drawings.* The original drawings submitted with the application for the tests and the final drawings which the manufacturer must submit to MSHA before approval is granted, to show the details of the lamp as approved, are retained. These drawings are used to identify the lamp and its parts in the approval and as a means of checking the future commercial product of the manufacturer.
( b ) *Equipment.* ( 1 ) If MSHA so desires, parts of the lamps which are used in the tests will be retained as a permanent record of the investigation and of the lamps submitted.
( 2 ) If the lamp is approved, MSHA will require the manufacturer, as soon as his first manufactured lamps are available, to submit one complete lamp, with the approval plate attached, as a record of his commercial product.
### §1306. Reporting official action

(a) Reports on Proceedings.—The Board shall make a written report of each proceeding conducted on complaint or on its own initiative and furnish a copy to each party to that proceeding. The report shall include the findings, conclusions, and the order of the Board and, if damages are awarded, the findings of fact supporting the award. The Board may have its reports published for public use. A published report of the Board is competent evidence of its contents.

(b) Special Rules for Matters Related to Rail Carriers.—(1) When action of the Board in a matter related to a rail carrier is taken by the Board, an individual member of the Board, or another individual or group of individuals designated to take official action for the Board, the written statement of that action (including a report, order, decision and order, vote, notice, letter, policy statement, or regulation) shall indicate—

(A) the official designation of the individual or group taking the action;

(B) the name of each individual taking, or participating in taking, the action; and

(C) the vote or position of each participating individual.

(2) If an individual member of a group taking an official action referred to in paragraph (1) does not participate in it, the written statement of the action shall indicate that the member did not participate. An individual participating in taking an official action is entitled to express the views of that individual as part of the written statement of the action. In addition to any publication of the written statement, it shall be made available to the public under section 552(a) of title 5.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title II, §201(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 934, §706; renumbered §1306, Pub. L. 114–110, §3(a)(3), Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 2228.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2015—Pub. L. 114–110 renumbered section 706 of this title as this section.
On petitioner’s petition for reconsideration filed January 8,

reconsideration allowed; decision (152 Or App 153, 951 P2d 205 (1998)) withdrawn; reversed and remanded for reconsideration March 18, 1998

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Joyce L. Reedy, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and Parklane Northwest, Inc., *Petitioners, v.*Joyce L. REEDY, McDonalds Corporation and Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation, *Respondents.*

(WCB Nos. 96-03323, 95-10848; CA A97958)

952 P2d 1056

Michael O. Whitty, Appellate Counsel, for petition.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Deits, Chief Judge,* and Landau, Judge.

*

 Deits, C. J., *vice*Leeson, J., resigned.

PER CURIAM

Reconsideration allowed; decision withdrawn; reversed and remanded for reconsideration in the light of 1997 amendments to ORS 656.262(10) by Oregon Laws, chapter 605, section 2. *Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Crisp,*150 Or App 361, 945 P2d 1117 (1997).
§ 1210.153 What reports must I submit for Indian gas valuation purposes? ( a ) *General.* For Indian gas valuation, under certain conditions under § 1206.172 of this chapter, lessees must submit the following forms: ( 1 ) Form ONRR-4410, Accounting for Comparison (Dual Accounting), Part A or part B; and/or
( 2 ) Form ONRR-4411, Safety Net Report.
( b ) *Reporting options.* You must submit Forms ONRR-4410 and ONRR-4411 manually. You may find the forms at *http://www.onrr.gov/FM/Forms/AFSOil_Gas.htm* or from contacts listed on that Web page.
( c ) *Reporting address.* You must submit completed Forms ONRR-4410 and ONRR-4411 by: ( 1 ) U.S. Postal Service regular or express mail addressed to Office of Natural Resources Revenue, P.O. Box 25165, MS 634000B, Denver, CO 80225-0165;
( 2 ) Special courier or overnight mail addressed to Office of Natural Resources Revenue, Building 85, Room A322, Denver Federal Center, West 6th Ave. and Kipling Blvd., Denver, Colorado 80225; or
( 3 ) Complete and submit the form electronically as an email attachment to *onrrindianforms@onrr.gov .*
[48 FR 35641, Aug. 5, 1983, as amended at 76 FR 76615, Dec. 8, 2011; 77 FR 25879, 25880, May 2, 2012; 87 FR 21745, 21746, Apr. 13, 2022]
§ 36.26 Composition of exhaust gas. ( a ) *Preliminary engine adjustment.* The engine shall be submitted to MSHA by the applicant in such condition that it can be tested immediately at full load and speed. The preliminary liquid-fuel-injection rate shall be such that the exhaust will not contain black smoke and the applicant shall adjust the injection rate promptly to correct any adverse conditions disclosed by preliminary tests.
( b ) *Final engine adjustment.* The liquid fuel supply to the engine shall be adjusted so that the undiluted exhaust gas shall contain not more than 0.30 percent, by volume, of carbon monoxide or 0.20 percent, by volume, of oxides of nitrogen (calculated as equivalent nitrogen dioxide, NO2) under any conditions of engine operation prescribed by MSHA when the intake air mixture to the engine contains 1.5 ±0.1 percent, by volume, of Pittsburgh natural gas.[3]
( c ) *Coupling or adapter.* The applicant shall provide the coupling or adapter for connecting the engine to MSHA's dynamometer. Note:
Preferably this coupling or adapter should be attached to the flywheel of the engine.
Clutches, transmissions, or torque converters ordinarily are not required in the coupling train. Footnotes -
36.26
[3] Investigation has shown that for practical purposes, Pittsburgh natural gas (containing a high percentage of methane) is a satisfactory substitute for pure methane in these tests.
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.191 How does BSEE conduct incident investigations? Any investigation that BSEE conducts under the authority of sections 22(d)(1) and (2) of the Act (43 U.S.C. 1348(d)(1) and (2)) is a fact-finding proceeding with no adverse parties. The purpose of the investigation is to prepare a public report that determines the cause or causes of the incident. The investigation may involve panel meetings conducted by a chairperson appointed by BSEE. The following requirements apply to any panel meetings involving persons giving testimony: ( a ) A person giving testimony may have legal or other representative(s) present to provide advice or counsel while the person is giving testimony. The chairperson may require a verbatim transcript to be made of all oral testimony. The chairperson also may accept a sworn written statement in lieu of oral testimony.
( b ) Only panel members, and any experts the panel deems necessary, may address questions to any person giving testimony.
( c ) The chairperson may issue subpoenas to persons to appear and provide testimony or documents at a panel meeting. A subpoena may not require a person to attend a panel meeting held at a location more than 100 miles from where a subpoena is served.
( d ) Any person giving testimony may request compensation for mileage, and fees for services, within 90 days after the panel meeting. The compensated expenses must be similar to mileage and fees the U.S. District Courts allow.
§ 81.95 Authority of Federal Reserve Banks. ( a ) Each Federal Reserve Bank is hereby authorized as fiscal agent of the GSEs to perform the following functions with respect to the issuance of Book-entry GSE Securities offered and sold by a GSE to which this subpart H applies, in accordance with the Securities Documentation, Federal Reserve Bank Operating Circulars, this subpart H, and procedures established by the Secretary consistent with these authorities: ( 1 ) To service and maintain Book-entry GSE Securities in accounts established for such purposes;
( 2 ) To make payments with respect to such securities, as directed by the GSE;
( 3 ) To effect transfer of Book-entry GSE Securities between Participants' Securities Accounts as directed by the Participants;
( 4 ) To effect conversions between Book-entry GSE Securities and Definitive GSE Securities with respect to those securities as to which conversion rights are available pursuant to the applicable Securities Documentation; and
( 5 ) To perform such other duties as fiscal agent as may be requested by the GSE.
( b ) Each Federal Reserve Bank may issue Operating Circulars not inconsistent with this subpart H, governing the details of its handling of Book-entry GSE Securities, Security Entitlements, and the operation of the book-entry system under this subpart H.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

I, Nazzareno E. Paciotti, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
GVI Security Solutions, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:

      (i) The Company's accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
      three months ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and

      (ii) The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

/s/ Nazzareno E. Paciotti
------------------------------------
Nazzareno E. Paciotti
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: November 22, 2004



                                       17
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed January 10, 2014. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00957

- CV

JOSH BRUCE , Appellant
V.
KRISTEN HOLZSCHUH , Appellee

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV13

- 00332

- V

- 292nd



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices FitzGerald, Lang, and Fillmore Opinion by Justice Fillmore
The filing fee in this case is past due. By postcard dated July 15, 2013, we notified

appellant the $175 filing fee was due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten

days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the

appeal without further notice. Also by postcard dated July 15, 2013, we notified appellant that

the docketing statement had not been filed in this case. We directed appellant to file the

docket ing statement within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so might result in

dismissal of his appeal . To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, filed the docketing

statement, or otherwise communicated with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.– 2

– Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(b)(c).

130957F.P05 /Robert M. Fillmore/

ROBERT M. FILLMORE
JUSTICE– 3

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

JOSH BRUCE, Appellant

No. 05

- 13

- 00957

- CV V.

KRISTEN HOLZSCHUH, Appellee On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. CV13

- 00332

- V

292nd. Opinion delivered by Justice Fillmore. Justices FitzGerald and Lang participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee KRISTEN HOLZSCHUH recover her costs of this appeal from appellant JOSH BRUCE.

Judgment entered this 10th day of January, 2014.

/Robert M. Fillmore/

ROBERT M. FILLMORE
JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Ray C. Dillon, the Chief Executive Officer, and Kenneth
D. Mann, the Chief Financial Officer, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Deltic Timber Corporation.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Ray C. DillonRay C. DillonChief Executive OfficerMay 6, 2010/s/ Kenneth D. MannKenneth D. MannChief Financial OfficerMay 6, 2010
#### § 402.1 Purpose.

The regulations in this part are issued pursuant to title I of the Water Resources Research Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-242, 98 Stat. 97), which authorizes appropriations to, and confers authority upon, the Secretary of the Interior to promote national programs of water-resources research and technology development.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CASBN 44332)

United States Attorney

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973)

Chief, Criminal Division

NATALIE K. WIGHT (ORSBN 35576)

Special Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, 11th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94102

Telephone: 415.436.6937

Facsimile: 415.436.7234

Email: natalie.wight@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

STANFORD H. ATWOOD, JR. (CSBN 37362)

ATWOOD & ASSOCIATES

750 University Avenue, Suite 130

Los Gatos, California 95032

Telephone: 408.395.5503

Facsimile: 408.395.5519

Email: stanford@atwoodlaw.net

JOHN J. JACKSON, III, PRO HAC VICE (DCBN 432019)

3240 S. I-10 Service Road W., Suite 200

Metairie, LA 70001

Telephone: 504.837.1233

Facsimile: 504.837.1145

Email: jjw-no@att.net

Attorneys for Claimant, William Pritchard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ONE SPORT-HUNTED LEOPARD

TROPHY

Defendant.

WILLIAM PRITCHARD,

Claimant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 09-CV-2443-SI

JOINT STIPULATION

AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER

TO VACATE STATUS CONFERENCE

Case 3:09-cv-02443-SI Document 21 Filed 03/02/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Vacate Status Conference

No. 09-CV-02443-SI 2

The Claimant and the United States have agreed on a settlement in lieu of further

litigation on this forfeiture action. The United States and Counsel for the Claimant are in the

process of finalizing the settlement documents and obtaining all necessary signatures.

Accordingly, the parties request that the Court vacate the telephonic Status Conference set for

March 5, 2010, at 3:00 p.m. The parties will submit a copy of the Settlement Agreement and the

related Motion to Dismiss the Complaint for Forfeiture as soon as the finalized documents are

signed.

STIPULATED AND RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY:

Dated: February 26, 2010 Respectfully submitted,

JOSEPH P. RUSONNIELLO

United States Attorney

________/s/____________________________

NATALIE K. WIGHT

Special Assistant United States Attorney

________/s/__________________________

JOHN J. JACKSON, III, PRO HAC VICE

Counsel for Claimant, William Pritchard

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation between the parties and for good cause shown, the telephonic

Status Conference set for Friday, March 5, 2010, at 3:00 p.m. is hereby vacated.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED.

Dated:___________________ ___________________________________

HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

The case management conference is continued to 3/26/10 at 3:00

p.m.

Case 3:09-cv-02443-SI Document 21 Filed 03/02/10 Page 2 of 2