alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IMPSAT Fiber Networks on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ricardo A. Verdaguer, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,that: 

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2. The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by theregistrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

Date: May 17, 2004 

 

/s/ Ricardo A. Verdaguer

Ricardo A. Verdaguer 

President and Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |   |
|   |                    /s/ Jack DeFranco                Jack                DeFrancoActing                Principal Executive Officer |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|   | Date:                April 17, 2006                                                                                                                                                                                              |

----
#### § 44.29 Motions.

Each motion filed shall be in writing and shall contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which it is based. A statement in opposition to the motion may be filed by any party within 10 days after the date of service. The administrative law judge may permit oral motions during proceedings.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3209

To amend title 38, United States Code, to add nasopharyngeal cancer to 

the statutorily prescribed presumptive diseases associated with exposure 

to Agent Orange during military service in Vietnam. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 12, 2005

Mr. BRADLEY of New Hampshire introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to add nasopharyngeal cancer to the statutorily prescribed presumptive diseases associated with exposure to Agent Orange during 

military service in Vietnam.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3209 IH 

1 SECTION 1. ADDITION OF NASOPHARYNGEAL CANCER TO 

2 THE STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED PRESUMP3 TIVE DISEASES ASSOCIATED WITH EXPOSURE 

4 TO AGENT ORANGE DURING MILITARY SERV5 ICE IN VIETNAM. 

6 Section 1116(a)(2)(F) of title 38, United States 

7 Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘or nasopharyngeal cancer’’ 

8 after ‘‘or trachea)’’.

Æ
#### § 56.19105 Landings with more than one shaft entrance.

A safe means of passage around open shaft compartments shall be provided on landings with more than one entrance to the shaft.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 10, 2020.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 23, 2020, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express Contract 84 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents                           ( print page 79535)                        are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2021-29, CP2021-30.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2020-27070 Filed 12-9-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
### §386. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–260, §1, Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat. 541

Section, act June 7, 1910, ch. 265, 36 Stat. 459, permitted adverse claims provided for in sections 29 and 30 of Title 30, Mineral Lands and Mining, to be filed at any time during the 60 days' period of publication or within eight months thereafter, and adverse suits provided for in section 30 of Title 30, to be instituted at any time within 60 days after the filing of said claims in the local land office.
Exhibit 31.2   CERTIFICATION  I, Richard W. Jackson, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Great American Family Parks, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  April 13, 2007  /s/ Richard W. Jackson

Richard W. Jackson
Chief Financial Officer
#### Annette Warner, Appellant, v. Fred Warner, Respondent.

In an action for a judicial separation, plaintiff wife appeals: (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 19, 1962, which awarded her $100 a week alimony *pendente lite,*and $1,000 counsel fees; and (2) from an order of said court, dated February 1, 1962, which denied her motion, based on additional facts and papers, for leave to renew and reargue her motion for temporary alimony and for counsel fees. Order, dated February 1, 1962, *807affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Appeal from order, dated January 19, 1962, dismissed, without costs. This order was superseded by the later order of February 1,1962 (cf. *Bentz*v. *Krasner,*15 A D 2d 669). Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Communication, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John M. Lowber, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date:  November 30, 2006 | /s/ John M. Lowber          |
|--------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                     | John M. Lowber              |
|                     | Chief Financial Officer     |
|                     | General Communication, Inc. |

 

 

 

1
<PAGE>




EXHIBIT 11.1

Computation of Proforma Net Loss Per Share




                                       26
<PAGE>

                         Triangle Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
                          (A Development Stage Company)

      Computation of Net Loss Per Share and Pro Forma Net Loss Per Share
                                  (Unaudited)


                                            Three Months        Three Months
                                               Ended               Ended
                                          March 31, 1996(1)   March 31, 1997(2)
                                          -----------------   -----------------
Historical weighted average shares
 outstanding............................             --          17,580,032

Pro forma historical weighted average
 shares outstanding.....................      4,097,333                  --

Series A preferred stock, convertible
 to Common Stock at consummation of
 the initial public offering............      5,231,671                  --

Series B preferred stock, convertible
 to Common Stock at consummation of 
 the initial public offering............      3,706,234                  --

Common stock equivalents for preferred
 stock warrants outstanding.............        146,000                  --

Common stock equivalents for options 
 outstanding............................      1,096,260                  --
                                             ----------         -----------

Shares used in computing pro forma
 net loss per share.....................     14,277,498          17,580,032
                                             ----------         -----------
                                             ----------         -----------

Net Loss................................      ($795,622)        ($3,544,052)
                                             ----------         -----------
                                             ----------         -----------

Pro forma loss per share................         ($0.06)             ($0.20)
                                             ----------         -----------
                                             ----------         -----------

(1)  Weighted average common stock outstanding during the period including 
     all common stock issued at prices below the public offering price during 
     the twelve month period preceding the offering as if it was outstanding 
     at inception (July 12, 1995). Issuance of convertible preferred stock, 
     preferred stock warrants and common stock options at prices below the 
     public offering price during the twelve month period preceding the 
     offering have been included as common stock equivalent as if they had 
     been issued as common stock as of July 12, 1995.

(2)  The weighted average shares outstanding used in the calculation of net 
     loss per share do not include common stock equivalents because they have 
     the effect of reducing net loss per share.

                                       27
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.11

                                                   [COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS LOGO]

                                                      400 Countrywide Way
March 15, 2005                                Simi Valley, California 93065-6298

RWT HOLDINGS, INC.
591 Redwood Hwy, # 3140
Mill Valley, CA 94941
Attn: Gloria Li

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

I, Joseph Candelario, hereby certify that I am the First Vice President, Loan
Administration of Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., fka Countrywide Funding
Corporation. I further certify, with respect to the Servicing Agreements for
Countrywide Mortgage Obligations, Inc., the following:

I have reviewed the activities and performance of the Servicer during the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004 under the Agreements and, to the best of my
knowledge, based on my review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its duties,
responsibilities or obligations under the Agreements throughout the fiscal year.

/s/ Joseph Candelario                                   March 15, 2005
----------------------------------------                Date
Joseph Candelario
First Vice President
Compliance Officer
Loan Administration

re: Investor Numbers: 7001476, 7001629, 7001755
#### § 44.50 Effect of appeal on initial decision.

Except as provided in § 44.14(c), a proposed decision and order of an Administrator is not operative pending appeal to an administrative law judge, and a decision of an administrative law judge is not operative pending appeal to the Assistant Secretary.

[55 FR 53443, Dec. 28, 1990]
§ 291.110 Who may BSEE require to produce information? ( a ) BSEE may require any lessee, operator of a lease or unit, shipper, grantee, or transporter to provide information that BSEE believes is necessary to make a decision on whether open access or nondiscriminatory access was denied.
( b ) If you are a party and fail to provide information BSEE requires under paragraph (a) of this section, BSEE may: ( 1 ) Assess civil penalties under 30 CFR part 250, subpart N;
( 2 ) Dismiss your complaint or consider your answer incomplete; or
( 3 ) Presume the required information is adverse to you on the factual issues to which the information is relevant.
( c ) If you are not a party to a complaint and fail to provide information BSEE requires under paragraph (a) of this section, BSEE may assess civil penalties under 30 CFR part 250, subpart N.
§ 904.301 Purpose. ( a ) It is essential that the homebuyers have an organized vehicle for pursuing their common interests, for effectively representing the needs of residents in dealing with the LHA, and for undertaking eventual management responsibility for the development. Although this organization, called the homebuyers association (HBA), shall be representative of the homebuyers and independent of the LHA, it shall be the responsibility of the LHA and the training and counseling staff to assist the homebuyers in their initial efforts at organization.
( b ) Except as noted in § 904.307, each Turnkey III development shall have an HBA. There shall be a separate HBA for each development or developments where there is a physical and financial community of interest.
You are here: EPA Home Pesticides Science & Policy Advisory Committee Pesticide

Program Dialogue Committee

Pesticide Program Dialogue Commi ttee May 3-4, 2012 Meeting



# Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee May 3-4, 2012 Meeting

You will need Adobe Reader to view some of the files on this page. See EPA's PDF

page to learn more.

Agenda (PDF) (3 pp, 36k) Transcript (PDF) (423 pp 787k)
Background Materials

Session II - Pollinator Protection

Pollinator Protection (PDF) (13 pp, 2.8 MB)
Session III - School Integrated Pest Management

USDA

- NRCS IPM (PDF) (13 pp, 2.7 MB)
Strategic and Implementation Plans for School Integrated Pest Management

(PDF) (1 pg, 162k)
IPM Workgroup: Subgroup 1 Report on May 2, 2012 Meeting (PDF) (25 pp,

3.73MB)
IPM Workgroup: Subgroup 2 Report on May 2, 2012 Meeting (PDF) (10 pp,

623k)

Session IV -

Update on the U.S. Endocrine Disrup tor Screening Program (PDF) (17 pp, 2.4

MB) Session V - Insect Repellency Mark

Insect Repellency Mark (PDF) (9 pg, 180k)
Background Document on the Insect Repellency Mark (PDF) (1 pg, 104k)

PPDC: Rules/Petitions and Other Activities of Interest (PDF) (6 pp, 53k)

Session VI - Economic Definition of Minor Use

Defining "Economic" Minor Use Under FIFRA 2(ll)(2) (PDF) (18 pp, 105k)
Background: Defining "Economic" Minor Use Under FIFRA 2(ll)(2) (PDF) (3

pp, 68k)

Guidance on Economic Minor Use Status (PDF) (3 pp, 47k)
Session VII - Spray Drift and Drift Reduction Technology

Drift Reduction Technology Program (PDF) (12 pp, 1.1 MB)

Session VIII -

Endangered Species Act Update (PDF) (16 pp, 46k)
Session IX - Registration Review and Water Quality - Process

Improvements

Registration Review Update (PDF) (2 pp, 27k)
Registration Review and Water Quality (PDF) (11 pp, 106k)
Registration Review: Request for Water Quality and Impaired Water Body

Data (PDF) (1 pg, 132k)
Session X - 21st Century Toxicology Biomonitoring Subgroup A (PDF) (2 pp, 70k)
Pesticide Priority List Subgroup (PDF) (2 pp, 40k)
Session XI - Regulatory Cooperation Council

U.S.

- Canada Regulatory Co

- operation Council (RCC) Crop Protection

Products Workplan (February 2012) (PDF) (4 pp, 88k)
Session XII - Sustainability and the U.S. EPA

NRC Report on Sustainab ility and the EPA (PDF) (13 pp, 429k)

Sustainabilit y Excer p t from Green Book ( PDF ) ( 4 pp, 1.2 MB ) 

## Pesticides: Science and Policy htt p : // www.e p a. g ov /p esticides /pp dc / 2012 / ma y/ meetin g .html

Last u p dated on Frida y, October 18

, 2013 

### Pa g e 1 of 1 Pesticide Pro g ram Dialo g ue Committee Ma y 3-4, 2012 Meetin g | Pesticides: Science and

...

10/18/2013 htt p ://www.e p a. g ov/ p esticides/ pp dc/2012/ma y /meetin g .html
§ 33.2 Definitions. As used in this part: ( a ) *Permissible,* as applied to a dust collector, means that it conforms to the requirements of this part, and that a certificate of approval to that effect has been issued.
( b ) *Bureau* means the United States Bureau of Mines.
( c ) *Certificate of approval* means a formal document issued by MSHA stating that the dust collector unit or combination unit has met the requirements of this part, and authorizing the use and attachment of an official approval plate or a marking so indicating.
( d ) *Certificate of performance* means a formal document issued by MSHA stating that a dust-collecting system has met the test requirements of Subpart C of this part and therefore is suitable for use as part of permissible units.
( e ) *Dust-collector unit* means a complete assembly of parts comprising apparatus for collecting the dust that results from drilling in rock in coal mines, and is independent of the drilling equipment.
( f ) *Combination unit* means a rock-drilling device with an integral dust-collecting system, or mining equipment with an integral rock-drilling device and dust-collecting system.
( g ) *Dust-collecting system* means an assembly of parts comprising apparatus for collecting the dust that results from drilling in rock and is dependent upon attachment to other equipment for its operation.
( h ) *Applicant* means an individual, partnership, company, corporation, association, or other organization that designs and manufactures, assembles or controls the assembly of a dust-collecting system, dust-collector unit, or a combination unit, and seeks certification thereof.
( i ) *MSHA* means the United States Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration.
[Sched. 25B, 25 FR 6473, July 9, 1960, as amended at 39 FR 24005, June 28, 1974; 43 FR 12317, Mar. 24, 1978]