alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   |   |   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|

**UNITED STATES**

**SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**

**Washington, D.C. 20549**

**FORM 10-Q/A**

(Amendment #1)

 

**(Mark One)**

 

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from           to

Commission File No. 0-15279

 

|   | **GENERAL COMMUNICATION, INC.**                        |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |   |

 

|   | **State of Alaska**             |   | **92-0072737**      |   |
|--------|---------------------------------|--------|---------------------|--------|
|   | (State or other Jurisdiction of |   | (I.R.S Employer     |   |
|   | Incorporation or organization)  |   | Identification No.) |   |

 

|   |                                     | **2550 Denali Street** |       |      |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------|------------------------|------------|-----------|--------|
|   |                                     | **Suite 1000**         |       |      |   |
|   |                                     | **Anchorage, Alaska**  |       | **99503** |   |
|   | (Address of Principal Executive offices) |                   | (Zip Code) |      |
|        |                                          |                        |            |           |        |  |

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: **(907) 868-5600**

 

Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (l) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.  See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

| Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer x | Non-accelerated filer o |
|---------------------------|---------------------|-------------------------|

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o No x

 

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's classes of common stock as of October 31, 2006 was:

49,884,728 shares of Class A common stock; and

3,380,257 shares of Class B common stock.

 

|   | 1 |
|--------|---|

 

----
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-29597 28-DEC-2010 10:51 AM NO. SCWC-29597 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I
COMPUSA STORES, L.P., Respondent/Appellant-Appellant,
vs. STATE OF HAWAI ' I, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION, Petitioner/Appellee-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NO. 29597; TAX APPEAL CASE NO. 05-0065) ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI 1 (By: Recktenwald, J., for the court ) Petitioner/Appellee-Appellee State of Hawai ' i, Department of Taxation’s application for writ of certiorari filed on November 22, 2010, is hereby accepted. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, December 28, 2010.

Hugh R. Jones and Damien A. Elefante, Deputy Attorneys General, on the applicationfor petitioner/appelleeappellee. Ray K. Kamikawa and Leroy E. Colombe (Chun, Kerr, Dodd, Beaman & Wong) on the response for respondent/ appellant-appellant. FOR THE COURT:

Associate Justice

1 Considered by: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ., and Circuit Judge Lee, assigned due to a vacancy.
§ 1227.110 When and for how long are delegation agreements effective? ( a ) Delegation agreements are effective for 3 years from the date the ONRR Director signs the delegation agreement. However, during the development of the State's delegation proposal under § 1227.108 of this part, ONRR, the delegated State, and any other affected person will determine an appropriate transition period for lessees and their designees to modify their systems to comply with any new requirements under a delegation agreement. ONRR will publish notice of the effective date of a State's delegation agreement in the Federal Register and that notice will inform lessees and their designees of any transition period. ONRR also will post the proposals on the ONRR Website at *www.boemre.gov ,* and upon request, will send a copy of the delegation proposals to trade associations to distribute to their members.
( b ) You may ask ONRR to renew the delegation for an additional 3 years no less than 6 months before your 3-year delegation agreement expires. You must submit your renewal request to the Director for Office of Natural Resources Revenue as follows: ( 1 ) If you do not want to change the terms of your delegation agreement for the renewal period, you need only ask to extend your existing agreement for the 3-year renewal period. ONRR will not schedule a hearing unless you request one;
( 2 ) If you want to change the terms of your delegation agreement for the renewal period, you must submit a new delegation proposal under this part.
( c ) The ONRR Director may approve your renewal request only if ONRR determines that you are meeting the requirements of the applicable standards and regulations. If the ONRR Director denies your renewal request, ONRR will state the reasons for denial. ONRR also will inform you in writing of the conditions you must meet to receive approval. You may submit a new renewal request any time after denial.
( d ) After the 3-year renewal period for your delegation agreement ends, if you wish to continue performing one or more delegated functions, you must request a new delegation agreement from ONRR under this part. ONRR will schedule a hearing on your request, if ONRR determines a hearing is appropriate. As part of the decision whether to approve your request for a new delegation, the ONRR Director will consider whether you are meeting the requirements of the applicable standards and regulations under your existing delegation agreement.
( e ) If you do not request a hearing under paragraphs (b)(1) or (d) of this section, any other affected person may submit a written request for a hearing under those paragraphs to the ONRR Associate Director for Minerals Revenue Management.
[62 FR 43084, Aug. 12, 1997, as amended at 67 FR 19112, Apr. 18, 2002; 75 FR 61087, Oct. 4, 2010]
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, Appellant, and Frank Rosa et al., Respondents.

Order entered March 8, 1963, unanimously reversed on the law and the facts, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant, and application by petitioner to stay arbitration granted to the extent that arbitration shall be stayed pending respondents’ examination under oath pursuant to the provisions of the New York Automobile Accident Indemnification Endorsement, such examination to be held on a day and place to be fixed in the order to be settled hereon. The insurer alleged to cover the negligently driven vehicle disclaimed liability on September 11, 1961, and on December 19, 1961, physical examinations of the respondents were conducted on behalf of the petitioner. Thereafter, the petitioner asserts that its repeated requests to attempt to mutually settle the respondents’ claims were thwarted; but, on the other hand, the respondents allege that petitioner would never discuss adjustment. In any event, it does not factually appear that the petitioner is chargeable with such loches in the matter of its handling of the claims as to amount to bad faith or that the respondents have been prejudiced in any substantial manner by petitioner’s failure to expeditiously proceed with their oral examination. Promptly, when respondents demanded arbitration in January, 1963, the petitioner requested that they appear for an examination under oath as required by the MVAIC indorsement. Under the circumstances, there was no loss or waiver of petitioner’s contractual right to such an examination. (See *Matter of Motor Vehicle Acc. Ind. Gorp.*[Lucash], 16 A D 2d 975.) The decision of *Matter of Smith*(MVAIO) (18 A D 2d 889) is clearly distinguishable and not controlling on the facts here. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
#### § 553.701 To which entities does this subpart apply?

This subpart applies to you if you are a responsible party for an offshore facility, other than a deepwater port under the Deepwater Port Act of 1974 (33 U.S.C. 1501-1524), but including an offshore pipeline, or an abandoned offshore facility, including any abandoned offshore pipeline, unless your liability is unlimited under OPA 90 (33 U.S.C. 2704(c)).
★

★

★

CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES

How the Medicare Beneficiary Ombudsman

Works For You

An “Ombudsman” is a person who reviews the performance of an organization or

program, and helps to resolve problems that are found. Congress requires that Medicare

have a Beneficiary Ombudsman to help people with Medicare. The Medicare

Beneficiary Ombudsman shares information with the Secretary of Health and Human

Services, Congress, and other organizations about what works well and what doesn’t

work well to improve the quality of the services and care you get through Medicare.

How does the Medicare Beneficiary Ombudsman help you? 

The Ombudsman makes sure information is available about the following:

• Your Medicare benefits

• What you need to know to make health care decisions that are right for you

• Your rights and protections under Medicare 

• How you can get issues resolved 

How does the Medicare Beneficiary Ombudsman help

you through other organizations? 

The Ombudsman also works with organizations like State Health Insurance Assistance

Programs (SHIPs) and Quality Improvement Organizations (QIOs) to make sure they

resolve your issues timely. These organizations provide information, counseling, and

assistance to help you with the following:

• Your Medicare questions, including your benefits, coverage, premiums, deductibles,

and coinsurance

• Grievances (complaints)

• Appeals (if you disagree with a coverage or payment decision made by Medicare or

your Medicare plan)

• Problems joining or leaving a Medicare Advantage Plan (like an HMO or PPO) or

any other Medicare health plan or Medicare Prescription Drug Plan
For More Information

• Visit www.medicare.gov and select “Ombudsman.”

• Visit the Ombudsman’s Web site at www.cms.hhs.gov/center/ombudsman.asp. 

• Call your Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) if you have a complaint

about the quality of Medicare-covered services. A Quality Improvement

Organization is a group of doctors and health care experts who check on and

improve the care given to people with Medicare. 

• Call your State Health Insurance Assistance Program (SHIP) if you have

questions about appeals, buying other insurance, choosing a Medicare health or

prescription drug plan, buying a Medigap policy, or Medicare rights and

protections. The SHIP is a state program that provides free local health

insurance counseling to people with Medicare. 

You can find the telephone number for your state’s QIO and SHIP by visiting

www.medicare.gov and selecting “Find Helpful Phone Numbers and Websites.”

You can also call 1-800-MEDICARE (1-800-633-4227). TTY users should call 

1-877-486-2048. 

★

CMS Product No. 11173

Revised January 2010
#### Nettie Room, plaintiff in error, v. The Salvation Army et al., defendants in error.

Gen. No. 27,547.

Suit against Salvation Army for slander. Directed verdict for defendants. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. David M. Brothers, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1922.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed October 17, 1923.

Rehearing denied November 2, 1923.

Charles E. Selleck, for plaintiff in error. Moses, Rosenthal & Kennedy, for defendants in error; Walter Baehrach and I. E. Ferguson, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice Taylor

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### Marion M. Bradley, Appellant-Respondent, v Travis P. Bradley, Respondent-Appellant.

In a custody proceeding, the parties cross-appeal from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated June 25, 1977, which, *inter alia,*dismissed the petition on the merits and continued custody in the father. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding remanded to the Family Court for a hearing as to the issue of custody. On the court’s own motion, the proceeding is transferred from the Family Court, Dutchess County, to the Family Court, Suffolk County, and the hearing shall be held in Suffolk County, where the child now resides. This proceeding should not have been determined on the pleadings. On oral argument, the father consented to a reversal and the holding of a hearing on the merits. Titone, J. P., Gulotta, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
§ 35.2 Definitions. As used in this part— ( a ) *Permissible,* as applied to hydraulic fluids, means that the fluid conforms to the requirements of this part, and that a certificate of approval to that effect has been issued.
( b ) *MSHA* means the United States Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration.
( c ) *Certificate of approval* means a formal document issued by MESA stating that the fluid has met the requirements of this part for fire-resistant hydraulic fluids and authorizing the use of an official identifying marking so indicating.
( d ) *Fire-resistant hydraulic fluid* means a fluid of such chemical composition and physical characteristics that it will resist the propagation of flame.
( e ) *Concentrate* means a substance in concentrated form that might not be fire resistant as such but when mixed with water or other vehicle in accordance with instructions furnished by the applicant will constitute a fire-resistant hydraulic fluid.
( f ) *Applicant* means an individual, partnership, company, corporation, association, or other organization that manufactures, compounds, refines, or otherwise produces, a fire-resistant hydraulic fluid or a concentrate for the production thereof, and seeks a certificate of approval.
[Sched. 30, 24 FR 10201, Dec. 17, 1959, as amended at 39 FR 24005, June 28, 1974; 43 FR 12317, Mar. 24, 1978]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Willowtree Advisors, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Cynthia Allison, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 23rd day of August, 2006.



| | CYNTHIA ALLISON                                    
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Cynthia Allison                                    
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





















---
§ 43.2 General. ( a ) Under section 103(g)(1) of the Act, a representative of miners, or where there is no such representative, a miner, who has reasonable grounds to believe that a violation of the act or a mandatory health or safety standard exists, or an imminent danger exists, has a right to obtain a special inspection if he or she gives notice of such violation to the Secretary or his duly authorized representative. The notice shall be reduced to writing and signed by the miners' representative or miner, and a copy that does not reveal the name of the person giving the notice must be served on the operator no later than at the time of the inspection. If the Secretary determines that a violation or danger does not exist, he must so notify the miners' representative or miner in writing.
( b ) Under section 103(g)(2) of the Act, a representative of miners or, if there is no such representative, a miner, may notify in writing an authorized representative of the Secretary who is on mine premises prior to or during an inspection, of any violation or imminent danger which he or she has reason to believe exists in the mine. There shall be procedures for the informal review of any refusal by the Secretary's authorized representative to issue a citation with respect to such alleged violation or danger, including notification to the miners' representative or miner of the reasons for his disposition of the case.
(Pub. L. No. 96-511, 94 Stat. 2812 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*))
[43 FR 29515, July 7, 1978, as amended at 47 FR 14696, Apr. 6, 1982; 60 FR 33722, June 29, 1995]
§ 910.4 Confidentiality; Record of grievances awarded. ( a ) To the maximum extent practicable, the Board will make every effort to preserve the confidentiality of the identity of the grievant or charged employee.
( b ) The records of the Board shall be maintained by the Board under appropriate safeguards to preserve confidentiality and shall be separate from all records of the Agencies; provided, however, that records of all grievances awarded in favor of the Grievant in which the grievance concerns gross misconduct by a supervisor shall be separately maintained by the Board and the procedures regarding confidentiality and disclosure of such records shall be as provided in section 1107(e) of the Foreign Service Act of 1980, as amended; and provided further, that the Board shall not make a finding of gross misconduct without first providing the supervisor whose conduct is at issue notice and an opportunity to respond.
[50 FR 31358, Aug. 2, 1985. Redesignated and amended at 56 FR 55460, Oct. 28, 1991]
Editorial Note on Part 5
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 5 appear at 65 FR 16715, Mar. 29, 2000.

§ 5.300 Purpose. ( a ) This subpart implements section 227 of the Housing and Urban-Rural Recovery Act of 1983 (12 U.S.C. 1701r-1) as it pertains to projects for the elderly or persons with disabilities under: ( 1 ) The housing programs administered by the Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing Commissioner;
( 2 ) Projects assisted under the programs contained in chapter VIII of this title 24; and
( 3 ) The public housing program.
( b ) [Reserved]
[61 FR 5202, Feb. 9, 1996, as amended at 65 FR 16715, Mar. 29, 2000]
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.868 Non-metallic piping.

On fixed OCS facilities, you may use non-metallic piping (such as that made from polyvinyl chloride, chlorinated polyvinyl chloride, and reinforced fiberglass) only in accordance with the requirements of § 250.841(b).
#### WILLIAMS, Respondent, v. CLARK et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 23, 1903.)

Action by Walter D. Williams against Mary E. Clark and others.

A. G. McLaughlin, for appellants.

R. L. Harrison, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Appeal No. 76-102.

#### Joseph A. Lancellotti *et al. v.*Enrico Lancellotti *et al.*

*Moses Kando, William G. Grande,*for plaintiffs.

*Francis Cappalli,*for defendants.

The plaintiffs’ motion for special assignment is granted and this ease is assigned to the calendar for May 5, 1977, 9:30 a.m., for oral argument.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsVolumetrically-Derived Global Navigation Satellite System Performance Assessment from the Earths Surface through the Terrestrial Service Volume and the Space Service VolumeNASA is participating in the International Committee on Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) (ICG)'s efforts towards demonstrating the benefits to the space user from the Earth's surface through the Terrestrial Service Volume (TSV) to the edge of the Space Service Volume (SSV), when a multi-GNSS solution space approach is utilized. The ICG Working Group: Enhancement of GNSS Performance, New Services and Capabilities has started a three phase analysis initiative as an outcome of recommendations at the ICG-10 meeting, in preparation for the ICG-11 meeting. The first phase of that increasing complexity and fidelity analysis initiative was recently expanded to compare nadir-facing and zenith-facing user hemispherical antenna coverage with omnidirectional antenna coverage at different distances of 8,000 km altitude and 36,000 km altitude. This report summarizes the performance using these antenna coverage techniques at distances ranging from 100 km altitude to 36,000 km to be all encompassing, as well as the volumetrically-derived system availability metrics.Document ID20160013863Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsWelch, Bryan W.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredNovember 30, 2016Publication DateNovember 1, 2016Subject CategorySpace Communications, Spacecraft Communications, Command And TrackingReport/Patent NumberE-19300GRC-E-DAA-TN36139NASA/TM-2016-219398Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 439432.07.01.15.07.02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.KeywordsGlobal Positioning SystemNavigationRadio NavigationAvailable DownloadsNameType20160013863.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Olive Kalmus et al., Appellants, v Oystermen’s Bank and Trust Company, Respondent. (And a Third-Party Action.)

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated June 28, 1977, which denied their motion to vacate and set aside a stipulation of settlement and to restore the action to the Trial Calendar. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Under the circumstances, the Special Term did not err in denying plaintiffs’ motion to vacate a stipulation of settlement and to restore the action to the Trial Calendar. The stipulation was complete and was knowingly entered into by the parties in open court, in the presence of counsel and after thorough questioning by the Trial Justice. No evidence of fraud, duress or overreaching has been presented. Titone, J. P., Suozzi, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
#### EVANS, Appellant, v. LARKIN, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 25, 1903.)

Action by Elmer O. Evans against Francis Larkin, Jr.

No opinion. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, on the authority of Quinn v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 84 N. Y. Supp. 738, decided November 20, 1903, and motion denied, with costs.