alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-54-2020]

On August 12, 2020, Airbus OneWeb Satellites North America LLC submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within FTZ 136, in Merritt Island, Florida.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (85 FR 51010-51011, August 19, 2020). On December 10, 2020, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: December 10, 2020.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2020-27550 Filed 12-14-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Barry S Baer, does hereby certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:



1.              The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.              The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|/s/ Colonel Barry S. Baer                                                                                        | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Colonel (Ret.) Barry S. Baer Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer May 15, 2012 |
### §11. Powers of Federal Communications Commission

If any railroad or telegraph company referred to in section 9 of this title, or company operating such railroad or telegraph line shall refuse or fail, in whole or in part, to maintain, and operate a telegraph line as provided herein, for the use of the Government or the public, for commercial and other purposes, without discrimination, or shall refuse or fail to make or continue such arrangements for the interchange of business with any connecting telegraph company, then any person, company, corporation, or connecting telegraph company may apply for relief to the Federal Communications Commission, whose duty it shall thereupon be, under such rules and regulations as said commission may prescribe, to ascertain the facts, and determine and order what arrangement is proper to be made in the particular case, and the railroad or telegraph company concerned shall abide by and perform such order; and it shall be the duty of the Federal Communications Commission, when such determination and order are made, to notify the parties concerned, and, if necessary, enforce the same by writ of mandamus in the courts of the United States, in the name of the United States, at the relation of either of said communication commissioners. The commissioners may institute any inquiry, upon their own motion, in the same manner and to the same effect as though complaint had been made.

(Aug. 7, 1888, ch. 772, §3, 25 Stat. 383; June 19, 1934, ch. 652, §601, 48 Stat. 1101.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Duties, powers, and functions under this section relating to operation of telegraph lines by railroad and telegraph lines granted Government aid in construction of their lines imposed on and vested in Federal Communications Commission by act June 19, 1934. See section 601 of this title.
### §11702. Enforcement by the Board

The Board may bring a civil action—

(1) to enjoin a rail carrier from violating sections 10901 through 10906 of this title, or a regulation prescribed or order or certificate issued under any of those sections;

(2) to enforce subchapter II of chapter 113 of this title and to compel compliance with an order of the Board under that subchapter; and

(3) to enforce an order of the Board, except a civil action to enforce an order for the payment of money, when it is violated by a rail carrier providing transportation subject to the jurisdiction of the Board under this part.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §102(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 845.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 11702, Pub. L. 95–473, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1450; Pub. L. 96–296, §§15(c), 16(c), July 1, 1980, 94 Stat. 809, 810; Pub. L. 97–261, §25(e), Sept. 20, 1982, 96 Stat. 1125; Pub. L. 98–554, title II, §226(c)(5), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2851; Pub. L. 100–690, title IX, §9111(j), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4534, related to authority of Interstate Commerce Commission to bring a civil action to enforce various provisions of this subtitle, prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a). See sections 11702, 14702, and 15902 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
#### In the Matter of Raymond M. Weinstein et al., Petitioners, v City of New York Department of Housing Preservation and Development et al., Respondents.

[832 NYS2d 443]—

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the City of New York Department of Housing Preservation and Development dated March 23, 2005, which, after a hearing, granted the application of Cadman Towers, Inc., for a certificate authorizing it to proceed with a proceeding to evict the petitioners.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed, on the merits, with costs payable to the respondent City of New York Department of Housing Preservation and Development.

There is no merit to the petitioners’ contention that the missing portion of the hearing transcript warrants an annulment of the administrative determination. This Court is able to undertake a meaningful review of the administrative determination under the substantial evidence standard based upon the available testimony and the documentary evidence *(see Matter of Sledge v Sledge,*228 AD2d 310, 310 [1996]; *Matter of Peterkin v Reid,*105 AD2d 707, 707 [1984]). Moreover, there is substantial evidence in the record to support the determination of the respondent the City of New York Department of Housing Preservation and Development that the petitioners were subject to eviction from the subsidized apartment they occupied *(see*28 RCNY 3-02 [n] [4]; [p] [2] [ii]; [3]-[4]; *Matter of Shi Yi Tang v New York City Dept. of Hous. Preserv. & Dev.,*29 AD3d 470 [2006]; *Matter of Estate of Vaisman v East Midtown Plaza Hous. Co.,*15 AD3d 290 [2005]).

The petitioners’ remaining contentions are without merit. Miller, J.P., Mastro, Ritter and Balkin, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40573

ERICA McINTOSH, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Texas

(1:98-CV-15)

July 12, 2000

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

AFFIRMED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.6.
§ 28.20 Certificates of approval; scope of approval. ( a ) MSHA shall issue certificates of approval pursuant to the provisions of this subpart only for individual, completely fabricated fuses which have been examined, inspected, and tested as specified in § 28.10, and have been evaluated by MSHA to ensure that they meet the minimum requirements prescribed in this part.
( b ) MSHA shall not issue an informal notification of approval.
### Geological investigations of the Wamsutter Rim canneloid coal bed in the Eocene Niland Tongue of the Wasatch Formation, northern Washakie Basin, southwest Wyoming

#### Bulletin 2018

- By:
-  Henry W. Roehler  and  Ronald W. Stanton 

Tweet

#### Links

- Document:  **Document**                                (pdf)
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                                (pdf)
- Paper version:   In stock and available from the  **USGS Store**
- Download citation as:   RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

- Publication type:
- Report
- Publication Subtype:
- USGS Numbered Series
- Title:
- Geological investigations of the Wamsutter Rim canneloid coal bed in the Eocene Niland Tongue of the Wasatch Formation, northern Washakie Basin, southwest Wyoming
- Series title:
- Bulletin
- Series number:
- 2018
- Edition:
- -
- Year Published:
- 1992
- Language:
- ENGLISH
- Publisher:
- U.S. G.P.O. ; U.S. Geological Survey, For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales [distributor],
- Description:
- iv, 16 p. ill., maps ;28 cm.

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found here.
#### MAINWARING, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT, & H. R. R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 15, 1905.)

Action by Elizabeth Mainwaring, as, etc., against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company. No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs.
§ 943.148 What procurement standards apply to PHAs selecting partners for a joint venture? ( a ) The requirements of part 85 of this title are applicable to this part, subject to paragraph (b) of this section, in connection with the PHA's public housing program.
( b ) A PHA may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications-based procurement (request for qualifications or “RFQ”), or may solicit a proposal from only one source (“sole source”) to select a joint venture partner to perform an administrative or management function of its public housing program or to provide or arrange to provide supportive or social services covered under this part, under the following circumstances: ( 1 ) The proposed joint venture partner has under its control and will make available to the partnership substantial, unique and tangible resources or other benefits that would not otherwise be available to the PHA on the open market (*e.g.,* planning expertise, program experience, or financial or other resources). In this case, the PHA must maintain documentation to substantiate both the cost reasonableness of its selection of the proposed partner and the unique qualifications of the partner: or
( 2 ) A resident group or a PHA subsidiary is willing and able to act as the PHA's partner in performing administrative and management functions or to provide supportive or social services. This entity must comply with the requirements of 2 CFR part 200 (if the entity is a nonprofit or a State or local government) with respect to its selection of the members of the team and the members must be paid on a cost-reimbursement basis only. The PHA must maintain documentation that indicates both the cost reasonableness of its selection of a resident group or PHA subsidiary and the ability of that group or subsidiary to act as the PHA's partner under this provision.
[65 FR 71207, Nov. 29, 2000, as amended at 80 FR 75942, Dec. 7, 2015]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information primarily extracted from
Capita Preferred Funding L.P.'s unaudited consolidated income statement and
balance sheet as of and for the six months ended June 30, 1998 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                 1,000
       
<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                0
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  2,434<F2>
<PP&E>                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                        0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  242,580
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 0<F2>
<BONDS>                               0
<COMMON>                         36,394
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                     206,186
<OTHER-SE>                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    242,580
<SALES>                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 10,722
<CGS>                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  10,722
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              10,722
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                     10,722
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0

        


<FN>

*    In accordance with Regulation S-K item 601(c) 2, inapplicable or immaterial
     financial data is reflected as zero value.

<F1> Accumulated depreciation relates to equipment under operating leases.

<F2> This item is not applicable since the Partnership does not prepare a
     classified balance sheet.

</FN>



</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.75
  Confidential treatment has been requested for portions of this exhibit. The copy filed herewith
omits the information subject to the confidentiality request. Omissions are designated as ***. A
complete version of this exhibit has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
             By:
    
    Shanghai Stock ExchangeInformation Network Co., Ltd.
 ***
    
    - indicates material omitted pursuant to a Confidential Treatment Request and filed separately
with the Securities and Exchange Commission




---



##### 



2.2
    
    Designated bank and account by Party A:
Bank: China Merchants Bank, Shanghai Branch, Jinqiao Sub-branch
Name: Shanghai Stock Exchange Information Network Co., Ltd.
Account No.:
 Party A: Shanghai Stock Exchange Information
Network Co., Ltd.
    
    Party B: Fortune Software (Beijing) Co., Ltd.(Signature or Seal) /s/
    
    (Signature or Seal) /s/[COMPANY SEAL]
    
    [COMPANY SEAL]Date of Execution:
    
    Date of Execution:
 ***
    
    - indicates material omitted pursuant to a Confidential Treatment Request and filed separately
with the Securities and Exchange Commission




---



##### 



Product/ Service
    
    Product/ServiceType
    
    Name
    
    Description
    
    Quantity
    
    SelectSatellite System
    
    Shanghai Broadband
Satellite VSAT
    
    Subscribe by Party B
from Shanghai 
Stock
Communication Co., Ltd.
    
    One Set
    
    YesGround System
    
    INTERNET Transmission
    
    Provided by Party A, ***
    
    One Set
    
    YesDedicated Line Transmission
    
    Provided by Party A, ***
    
    One Set
    
    No
 Notes:
    
    None Party A: Shanghai Stock Exchange Information
Network Co., Ltd.
    
    Party B: Fortune Software (Beijing) Co., Ltd.(Signature or Seal) /s/
    
    (Signature or Seal) /s/[COMPANY SEAL]
    
    [COMPANY SEAL]Date of Execution:
    
    Date of Execution:
 ***
    
    - indicates material omitted pursuant to a Confidential Treatment Request and filed separately
with the Securities and Exchange Commission
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.120 How does injecting, storing, or treating gas affect my royalty payments? ( a ) If you produce gas from an OCS lease and inject it into a reservoir on the lease or unit for the purposes cited in § 250.118(b), you are not required to pay royalties until you remove or sell the gas from the reservoir.
( b ) If you produce gas from an OCS lease and store it according to 30 CFR 550.119, you must pay royalty before injecting it into the storage reservoir.
( c ) If you produce gas from an OCS lease and treat it at an off-lease or off-unit location, you must pay royalties when the gas is first produced.
### §407. Order for payment of money; petition for enforcement; procedure; order of Commission as prima facie evidence; costs; attorneys' fees

If a carrier does not comply with an order for the payment of money within the time limit in such order, the complainant, or any person for whose benefit such order was made, may file in the district court of the United States for the district in which he resides or in which is located the principal operating office of the carrier, or through which the line of the carrier runs, or in any State court of general jurisdiction having jurisdiction of the parties, a petition setting forth briefly the causes for which he claims damages, and the order of the Commission in the premises. Such suit in the district court of the United States shall proceed in all respects like other civil suits for damages, except that on the trial of such suits the findings and order of the Commission shall be prima facie evidence of the facts therein stated, except that the petitioner shall not be liable for costs in the district court nor for costs at any subsequent stage of the proceedings unless they accrue upon his appeal. If the petitioner shall finally prevail, he shall be allowed a reasonable attorney's fee, to be taxed and collected as a part of the costs of the suit.

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title IV, §407, 48 Stat. 1095.)
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1933 What procedures must be included for reporting unsafe working conditions? ( a ) Your SEMS program must include procedures for all personnel to report unsafe working conditions in accordance with § 250.193. These procedures must take into account applicable USCG reporting requirements for unsafe working conditions.
( b ) You must post a notice at the place of employment in a visible location frequently visited by personnel that contains the reporting information in § 250.193.
[78 FR 20443, Apr. 5, 2013]
#### § 18.26 Static electricity.

Nonmetallic rotating parts, such as belts and fans, shall be provided with a means to prevent an accumulation of static electricity.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         373,368
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  552,442
<ALLOWANCES>                                    48,958
<INVENTORY>                                    105,735
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,075,898
<PP&E>                                       2,966,181
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,258,233
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,759,154
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         61
<COMMON>                                        87,890
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,637,277)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,258,233
<SALES>                                      6,309,417
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,309,417
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (8,120,093)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,794,336)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (80,215)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,714,121)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,714,121)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.39)
        

</TABLE>
#### Gerald Aptaker, Appellant, v Julia Aptaker, Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered January 5, 1977, amending final judgment of divorce so as to increase the amount to be paid by plaintiff husband to defendant, his former wife, for child support and alimony to $90 per week, is unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and the matter is remanded for an evidentiary hearing. In the interim and pending such hearing and the determination thereon, plaintiff is directed to pay $35 per week for the support of defendant and $35 per week for the support and maintenance of the infant issue of the marriage, effective on the date specified in the order appealed from, i.e., one week after service by defendant upon plaintiff, of a copy of the order appealed from. During said interim, defendant shall not be required to repay any overpayments that may have heretofore been made pursuant to the order appealed from. Plaintiff was entitled to have an evidentiary hearing to determine the amount of his support payments. The original *531divorce judgment provided for support payments of $35 per week for the wife and $35 per week for the child. Thereafter plaintiff left his employment in order to study for a master’s degree, and during this period the Family Court reduced the amount of his required payments to $20 per week. Plaintiff has completed his studies for his master’s degree and has now obtained employment. His former wife also has some earnings. Obviously, the support level should be fixed in the light of the changed circumstances. It would appear that the fairest interim level of support should be the one fixed in the divorce judgment at a time when plaintiff was employed. We emphasize that this is of course only an interim allowance which shall not be deemed in any way determinative of the level that should be fixed after an evidentiary hearing. Concur — Silverman, J. P., Evans, Lane and Markewich, JJ.