alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.744 What are the end of operation reporting requirements? ( a ) Within 30 days after completing operations, except routine operations as defined in § 250.601, you must submit Form BSEE-0125, End of Operations Report (EOR), to the District Manager. The EOR must include: a listing, with top and bottom depths, of all hydrocarbon zones and other zones of porosity encountered with any cored intervals; details on any drill-stem and formation tests conducted; documentation of successful negative pressure testing on wells that use a subsea BOP stack or wells with mudline suspension systems; and an updated schematic of the full wellbore configuration. The schematic must be clearly labeled and show all applicable top and bottom depths, locations and sizes of all casings, cut casing or stubs, casing perforations, casing rupture discs (indicate if burst or collapse and rating), cemented intervals, cement plugs, mechanical plugs, perforated zones, completion equipment, production and isolation packers, alternate completions, tubing, landing nipples, subsurface safety devices, and any other information required by the District Manager regarding the end of well operations. The EOR must indicate the status of the well (completed, temporarily abandoned, permanently abandoned, or drilling suspended) and the date of the well status designation. The well status date is subject to the following: ( 1 ) For surface well operations and riserless subsea operations, the operations end date is subject to the discretion of the District Manager; and
( 2 ) For subsea well operations, the operations end date is considered to be the date the BOP is disconnected from the wellhead unless otherwise specified by the District Manager.
( b ) You must submit public information copies of Form BSEE-0125 according to § 250.186(b).
### §1383. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 650

Section, act July 2, 1940, ch. 516, §3, 54 Stat. 724, provided for appointment and compensation of Board of Directors of Canal Zone Biological Area.
### §761a. Incentives; limitation on expansion pending privatization

#### (a) Limitation

Until INTELSAT, Inmarsat, and their successor or separate entities are privatized in accordance with the requirements of this subchapter, INTELSAT, Inmarsat, and their successor or separate entities, respectively, shall not be permitted to provide additional services. The Commission shall take all necessary measures to implement this requirement, including denial by the Commission of licensing for such services.

#### (b) Orbital location incentives

Until such privatization is achieved, the United States shall oppose and decline to facilitate applications by such entities for new orbital locations to provide such services.

(Pub. L. 87–624, title VI, §602, as added Pub. L. 106–180, §3, Mar. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 50.)
Certification of Principal Financial Officer
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Calamos Asset Management, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   March 13, 2009/s/ Cristina WasiakCristina WasiakSenior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSubsonic flight test evaluation of a propulsion system parameter estimation process for the F100 engineIntegrated engine-airframe optimal control technology may significantly improve aircraft performance. This technology requires a reliable and accurate parameter estimator to predict unmeasured variables. To develop this technology base, NASA Dryden Flight Research Facility (Edwards, CA), McDonnell Aircraft Company (St. Louis, MO), and Pratt & Whitney (West Palm Beach, FL) have developed and flight-tested an adaptive performance seeking control system which optimizes the quasi-steady-state performance of the F-15 propulsion system. This paper presents flight and ground test evaluations of the propulsion system parameter estimation process used by the performance seeking control system. The estimator consists of a compact propulsion system model and an extended Kalman filter. The extended Laman filter estimates five engine component deviation parameters from measured inputs. The compact model uses measurements and Kalman-filter estimates as inputs to predict unmeasured propulsion parameters such as net propulsive force and fan stall margin. The ability to track trends and estimate absolute values of propulsion system parameters was demonstrated. For example, thrust stand results show a good correlation, especially in trends, between the performance seeking control estimated and measured thrust.Document ID19930003967Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsOrme, John S.*(NASA Hugh L. Dryden Flight Research Facility Edwards, CA, United States)*Gilyard, Glenn B.*(NASA Hugh L. Dryden Flight Research Facility Edwards, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1992Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-4426NAS 1.15:4426H-1809AIAA PAPER 92-3745Meeting InformationMeeting: AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE Joint Propulsion ConferenceLocation: Nashville, TNCountry: United StatesStart Date: July 6, 1992End Date: July 8, 1992Accession Number93N13155Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 533-02-36Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930003967.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.112 What standards must my welding equipment meet? Your welding equipment must meet the following requirements: ( a ) All engine-driven welding equipment must be equipped with spark arrestors and drip pans;
( b ) Welding leads must be completely insulated and in good condition;
( c ) Hoses must be leak-free and equipped with proper fittings, gauges, and regulators; and
( d ) Oxygen and fuel gas bottles must be secured in a safe place.
§ 91.420 Action plan. ( a ) *Form application.* The action plan for the consortium must include a Standard Form 424 for the consortium for the HOME program. Each entitlement jurisdiction also must submit a Standard Form 424 for its funding under the CDBG program and, if applicable, the ESG and HOPWA programs.
( b ) *Description of resources and activities.* The action plan must describe the resources to be used and activities to be undertaken to pursue its strategic plan. The consolidated plan must provide this description for all resources and activities within the entire consortium as a whole, as well as a description for each individual community that is a member of the consortium.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2506-0117) [60 FR 1896, Jan. 5, 1995, as amended at 80 FR 42366, July 16, 2015; 85 FR 47909, Aug. 7, 2020]
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.827 Surface-controlled SSSVs—subsea trees.

You must equip all tubing installations open to a hydrocarbon-bearing zone that is capable of natural flow with a surface-controlled SSSV, except as specified in §§ 250.829 and 250.830. The surface controls must be located on the host facility.
### §22105. Sharing project costs

(a) General.—(1) The United States Government's share of the costs of financial assistance for a project under this chapter is 50 percent, except that for assistance provided under section 22101(a)(2) of this title, the Government's share is 70 percent. The State may pay its share of the costs in cash or through the following benefits, to the extent that the benefits otherwise would not be provided:

(A) forgiveness of taxes imposed on a rail carrier or its property.

(B) real and tangible personal property (provided by the State or a person for the State) necessary for the safe and efficient operation of rail freight transportation.

(C) track rights secured by the State for a rail carrier.

(D) the cash equivalent of State salaries for State employees working on the State project, except overhead and general administrative costs.

(2) A State may pay more than its required percentage share of the costs of a project under this chapter. When a State, or a person acting for a State, pays more than the State share of the costs of its projects during a fiscal year, the excess amount shall be applied to the State share for the costs of the State projects for later fiscal years.

(b) Agreements To Combine Amounts.—States may agree to combine any part of the amounts made available under this chapter to carry out a project that is eligible for assistance under this chapter when—

(1) the project will benefit each State making the agreement; and

(2) the agreement is not a violation of State law.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 897.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 22105(a) | 49 App.:1654(e). | Oct. 15, 1966, Pub. L. 89–670, 80 Stat. 931, §5(e), (j); added Feb. 5, 1976, Pub. L. 94–210, §803, 90 Stat. 130; Nov. 8, 1978, Pub. L. 95–607, §§102–106(a), 107– 109(a), 92 Stat. 3059, 3062; Oct. 12, 1979, Pub. L. 96–86, §115(b), 93 Stat. 662; Aug. 13, 1981, Pub. L. 97–35, §§1191, 1192, 95 Stat. 699; Jan. 14, 1983, Pub. L. 97–468, §501, 96 Stat. 2551; Apr. 7, 1986, Pub. L. 99–272, §4018, 100 Stat. 111; restated Dec. 11, 1989, Pub. L. 101–213, §2(a), (c), 103 Stat. 1843, 1845, 1847. |
| 22105(b) | 49 App.:1654(j). | |

Section

In this section, the words "project" and "projects" are substituted for "program" for clarity and consistency in this section.

In subsection (a)(1), before clause (A), the words "financial assistance for a project under this chapter" are substituted for "rail freight assistance project" for clarity and consistency in this chapter. In clause (B), the words "for use in its rail freight assistance program" are omitted as unnecessary because of the restatement. In clause (D), the words "State employees" are substituted for "State public employees" to eliminate an unnecessary word.

In subsection (b), before clause (1), the words "States may agree" are substituted for "Two or more States . . . enter into an agreement" to eliminate unnecessary words.
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Home City Financial Corporation, (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months and six months ended June 30,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), we, J. William Stapleton, President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Operating Officer, and Charles A. Mihal, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ J. William Stapleton                /s/ Charles A. Mihal
-------------------------------------   ----------------------------------------
William Stapleton, President,           Charles A. Mihal
Chief Executive Officer and             Secretary, Treasurer and Chief
Chief Operating Officer                 Financial Officer

Date: August 15, 2005                   Date: August 15, 2005

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Home City
Financial Corporation and will be retained by Home City Financial Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


                                       23
### §12305. Displaying numbers

A number required by this chapter shall be painted on, or attached to, each side of the forward half of the vessel for which it was issued, and shall be the size, color, and type as may be prescribed by the Secretary. No other number may be carried on the forward half of the vessel.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 591.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 12305 | 46:1470 |

Section 12305 describes the manner in which a number must be displayed on a vessel, and prohibits the display of other numbers on the forward half of the vessel.
PUBLIC LAW 114–307—DEC. 16, 2016 130 STAT. 1523 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6014: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

Sept. 20, 21, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 1, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–307 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To allow the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to enter into 

reimbursable agreements for certain airport projects. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. REIMBURSABLE AGREEMENTS FOR CERTAIN AIRPORT 

PROJECTS. 

The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration may 

enter into a reimbursable agreement with a State or local government agency to carry out a project at an airport as to which 

notice is required under section 77.9 of title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations, if the agreement— 

(1) includes measures for cost-effective completion of such 

project; and 

(2) would not negatively affect the safety or efficiency of 

the national airspace system. 

Approved December 16, 2016. 

Notice. 

49 USC 47101 

note. 

Dec. 16, 2016 

[H.R. 6014] 


ralbany on LAP520R082 with PUBLIC LAW
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Vincent Puma, Respondent, v New York Telephone Company, Appellant. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed July 8, 1976. The board found "claimant sustained an accidental injury to his back arising out of and in the course of his employment.” The appellant has not demonstrated that the board arbitrarily denied it a proper opportunity to submit evidence or that there is a failure of substantial evidence to support the board finding. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board against the employer. Greenblott, J. P., Main, Larkin, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT


	This Agreement is entered into as of    February 1, 1998    by 
and among The Berwyn Fund, Inc. (the "Fund"), Wilmington Trust Company 
("WTC") and PNC Bank, N.A. ("PNC").

	WHEREAS, the Fund and WTC entered into a Custody Agreement (the 
"Fund Agreement") as of _______________ pursuant to which WTC provides 
certain services to the Fund as described therein;

	WHEREAS, WTC wishes to assign its right, title and interest in 
and under the Fund Agreement and its duties and obligations under the 
Fund Agreement to PNC, and such assignment is acceptable to the Fund;

	NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto, in consideration of the 
premises and agreements contained herein, and intending to be legally 
bound hereby, agree as follows:

	1.	Assignment.  WTC hereby assigns all of its right, title 
and interest in and under the Fund Agreement, and its duties and 
obligations under the Fund Agreement arising form the date hereof, to 
PNC.  PNC hereby accepts such assignment.

	2.	Acceptance by Fund.  The Fund hereby accepts and agrees to 
the assignment described in Section 1 hereof.

	3.	Fund Agreement.  The Fund agreement shall remain unchanged 
expect as is consistent with the provisions hereof.

	4.	Governing Law.  This Agreement shall be governed by 
Delaware law, without regard to principles of conflicts of the law.

	5.	Successors and Assigns.  This Agreement shall be binding 
upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their 
respective successors and permitted assigns.

	6.	Execution.  This Agreement maybe executed in two or more 
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of 
which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.  The 
facsimile signature of any party to this Agreement shall constitute 
the valid and binding execution hereof by such party.

	7.	Further Actions.  Each party agrees to perform such acts 
and execute such further documents as may be necessary to effectuate 
the purposes hereof.

	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have caused 
this Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first above 
written.

THE BERWYN FUND, INC.	WILMINGTON TRUST 
COMPANY


By:            Kevin M. Ryan           	By:            
Robert                               
Title:       Secretary-Treasurer       	Title:              
Vice President              


PNC BANK, N.A.  

By:                 Joseph                       
Title:       Senior Vice President        				
		           98-
rpt.asgnagr
#### In the Matter of Tamika C.P., Appellant, v Denise M., Respondent.

[834 NYS2d 772]—

*1214Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Patricia A. Maxwell, J.), entered March 28, 2006 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petition.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the petition is reinstated and the matter is remitted to Family Court, Erie County, for a hearing in accordance with the following memorandum: We agree with petitioner, the child’s biological mother, that Family Court erred in dismissing her petition seeking sole custody of the child without conducting a hearing. The child was residing with respondent, her paternal grandmother, pursuant to a consent order, and it is well established that "[extraordinary circumstances must be shown where, as here, the prior order granting custody of the child to [a nonparent] was made upon consent of the parties” *(Matter of Katherine D. v Lawrence D.,*32 AD3d 1350, 1351 [2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 717 [2006]; *see Matter of Guinta v Doxtator,*20 AD3d 47, 53 [2005]; *Matter of Gary G. v Roslyn P.,*248 AD2d 980, 981 [1998]). Because there has been no prior judicial determination of extraordinary circumstances in this case, the court erred in dismissing the petition without conducting a hearing to determine whether such circumstances exist to deprive petitioner of her superior right to custody *(see Gary G.,*248 AD2d at 981) and, if so, whether a change in custody is in the child’s best interests *(see Katherine D.,*32 AD3d at 1351). We therefore reverse the order, reinstate the petition and remit the matter to Family Court for a hearing consistent with our decision. Present—Hurlbutt, J.P, Martoche, Smith, Centra and Peradotto, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 98-60154

_______________________

GEORGE S LEE; THOMAS L PRICE; ALLEN G HOLDER; EVERETT O FREEMAN,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI; MIKE MOORE, Mississippi Attorney General,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

(2:96-CV-0380-PG)

_________________________________________________________________

May 6, 1999

Before JONES, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. R. 47.6.
### §1681a. Appointment of High Commissioner

Any appointment made on or after May 10, 1967, to the office of the High Commissioner of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands shall be made by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.

(Pub. L. 90–16, §2, May 10, 1967, 81 Stat. 15.)
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.122 What effect does subsurface storage have on the lease term?

If you use a lease area for subsurface storage of gas, it does not affect the continuance or expiration of the lease.
----

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: March 14, 2011 |   /s/ John M. Lowber   |
|----------------------|-----------------------------|
|                 | John M. Lowber              |
|                 | Chief Financial Officer     |
|                 | General Communication, Inc. |

----