alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Food Group Friend

Get a Head 

Put a grain on your plate.

Make a Face 

Pick fruits, vegetables, and a 

protein food to make eyes, 

nose, and a mouth. Have fun 

and be colorful!

Hair or Hat?

Choose a dairy food and cover 

the head.

Name Your 

Friend 

Have you used a food from each 

food group? If so, enjoy!

Ingredients Choose your favorite ingredients from every group

Grain Protein Food Vegetable Dairy Fruit

English muffin, brown rice 

cake, or bread

beans or egg carrots, celery, broccoli, tomatoes, peas, 

cucumber, or bell pepper

low-fat 

cheese

blueberries, bananas, raisins, 

apples, or grapes

May 2014 • FNS-469D • USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Discover MyPlate • http://teamnutrition.usda.gov
Amigo del grupo de alimentos

Consigue 

una cabeza 

Pon un producto integral

en tu plato.

Haz una cara 

Elije frutas, vegetales y un alimento 

rico en proteína para hacer los 

ojos, la nariz y la boca. ¡Diviértete y 

hazlo colorido!

¿Cabello o 

sombrero?

Elije un producto lácteo 

y cubre la cabeza.

Ponle nombre 

a tu amigo

¿Haz utilizado un alimento de 

cada grupo alimenticio? Si es así, 

¡disfrútalo!

Ingredientes Elije tus ingredientes favoritos de cada grupo

Grano Proteína Vegetales Lácteo Frutas

Panecillo inglés, torta de 

arroz integral o pan

frijoles o huevo zanahorias, apio, brócoli, tomates, 

guisantes, pepino o pimiento

queso bajo 

en grasa

arándanos, bananos, pasas, 

manzanas o uvas

Mayo 2014 • FNS-469-D-S • USDA es un proveedor y empleador que ofrece oportunidad igual para todos. Descubra MiPlato • http://teamnutrition.usda.gov
Exhibit 31
                                  ----------

                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------

          I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

          1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
          on Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in
          respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual
          report, of CWMBS, Inc., Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2004-HYB4;

          2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
          a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
          annual report;

          3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
          required to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under
          the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in
          these reports is included in these reports;

          4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          master servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar,
          agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance
          review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the
          reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
          that agreement; and

          5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
          master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards
          based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
          after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single
          Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as
          set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that
          is included in these reports.

          In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
          information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
          The Bank of New York, as Trustee and ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc.

          Date: March 28, 2005

                                        /s/ Steve Bailey
                                        ----------------
                                        Steve Bailey
                                        Senior Managing Director
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of OccuLogix, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William G.
Dumencu, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





By:
            /s/
      William G. DumencuWilliam G. DumencuChief
      Financial Officer
and  Treasurer





Dated:
            August
      26, 2008
### §70131. Definitions

In this subchapter:

(1) Law enforcement agency.—The term "law enforcement agency" means an agency of a State, a political subdivision of a State, or a Federally recognized tribe that is authorized by law to supervise the prevention, detection, investigation, or prosecution of any violation of criminal law.

(2) Security zone.—The term "security zone" means a security zone, established by the Commandant of the Coast Guard or the Commandant's designee pursuant to section 1 1 of title II of the Act of June 15, 1917 (50 U.S.C. 191) or section 7(b) 1 of the Ports and Waterways Safety Act (33 U.S.C. 1226(b)), for a vessel carrying especially hazardous cargo when such vessel—

(A) enters, or operates within, the internal waters of the United States and the territorial sea of the United States; or

(B) transfers such cargo or residue in any port or place, under the jurisdiction of the United States, within the territorial sea of the United States or the internal waters of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 111–281, title VIII, §828(a), Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 3005; amended Pub. L. 111–330, §1(16), Dec. 22, 2010, 124 Stat. 3570.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1 of title II of the Act of June 15, 1917, referred to in par. (2), which was classified to section 191 of Title 50, War and National Defense, was redesignated and transferred to section 70051 of this title by Pub. L. 115–282, title IV, §407(b)(1), (5), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4267.

Section 7(b) of the Ports and Waterways Safety Act, referred to in par. (2), which was classified to section 1226(b) of Title 33, Navigation and Navigable Waters, was redesignated and transferred to section 70116(b) of this title by Pub. L. 115–282, title IV, §402(b)(1), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4264. A duplicate transfer to section 70102a(b) of this title by section 408(a) of Pub. L. 115–282 was repealed by Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8507(d)(1), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4754.

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–330 amended Pub. L. 111–281, §828(a), which enacted this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Pub. L. 111–330, §1, Dec. 22, 2010, 124 Stat. 3569, provided that the amendment made by section 1(16) is effective with the enactment of Pub. L. 111–281.

1 See References in Text note below.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7120

DONALD J. TYNER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus FRANK C. SIZER, JR., Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-00- 1426-L) Submitted: December 19, 2002 Decided: December 31, 2002 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald J. Tyner, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Mary Ann Rapp Ince, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Donald J. Tyner seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court on the merits absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000); see Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 122 S. Ct. 318 (2001). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Tyner has not made the requisite showing. See Tyner v. Sizer , No. CA-00-142 6-L (D. Md. June 28, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §57306. Payment of trade-in allowance

(a) Acquisition at Time of Contract.—If acquisition of an obsolete vessel under this chapter occurs when the owner contracts for the construction or purchase of the new vessel, the Secretary of Transportation shall apply the trade-in allowance to the purchase price of the new vessel rather than paying it to the owner. If the new vessel is constructed under this subtitle, the Secretary may apply the trade-in allowance to the required cash payments on terms and conditions the Secretary may prescribe. If the new vessel is not constructed under this subtitle, the Secretary shall pay the trade-in allowance to the builder of the vessel for the account of the owner when the Secretary acquires the obsolete vessel.

(b) Acquisition at Time of Delivery.—If acquisition of the obsolete vessel occurs when the new vessel is delivered to the owner, the Secretary shall deposit the trade-in allowance in the owner's capital construction fund.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1663.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 57306 | 46 App.:1160(b) (4th–7th sentences). | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title V, §510(b) (4th–7th sentences), as added Aug. 4, 1939, ch. 417, §7, 53 Stat. 1184; Pub. L. 87–401, subdiv. (1), Oct. 5, 1961, 75 Stat. 833; Pub. L. 91–469, §§12(b), 35(a), Oct. 21, 1970, 84 Stat. 1022, 1035; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(91), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 161. |

Section

In subsection (b), the words "acquisition of the obsolete vessel occurs" are substituted for "title to the obsolete vessel is acquired" for consistency in the chapter.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-20-00481-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.M., Jr., a Child

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019PA00115

Honorable H. Paul Canales, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 30, 2020

AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW DENIED

Appellant mother (“Mother”) appeals the trial court’s order terminating her parental rights 

to her child, A.M., Jr. Mother’s court-appointed appellate counsel filed a motion to withdraw and 

a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record, concluding there are no arguable grounds 

for reversal of the termination order. The brief satisfies the requirements of Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re P.M., 520 S.W.3d 24, 27 n.10 (Tex. 2016) (per curiam)

(recognizing that Anders procedures apply in parental termination cases). Additionally, counsel 

represents that he provided Mother with a copy of the brief and the motion to withdraw, advised 

Mother of her right to review the record and file her own brief, and informed Mother how to obtain 

a copy of the record, providing her with a form motion for access to the appellate record. We 
04-20-00481-CV

- 2 -

issued an order setting a deadline for Mother to file a pro se brief. However, Mother did not request 

the appellate record or file a pro se brief. 

After reviewing the appellate record and appointed counsel’s brief, we conclude no 

plausible grounds exist for reversal of the termination order. Accordingly, we affirm the trial 

court’s termination order. We deny counsel’s motion to withdraw because it does not show good 

cause for withdrawal. See id. at 27 & n.7 (holding that counsel’s obligations in a parental 

termination case extend through exhaustion or waiver of all appeals and that withdrawal should be 

permitted by a court of appeals “only for good cause” (citing TEX. R. CIV. P. 10)).

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
1667 K Street NW, Suite 300 | Washington, DC 20006 | www.cspa.org | p.202-872-8110 f.202-223-2636

Draft Agenda

CAPHRA Meeting with EPA

Focus on Neurotoxicology and Pharmacodynamics

November 7, 2013

EPA Headquarters, Crystal City, VA

10:00 am - 12:00 pm EDT

I. Introductions – 5’ 

II. Update on Overall Program - 15’ 

III. Pharmacodynamics – in vivo Acoustic Startle Response – 15’

IV. Pharmacodynamics – in vitro

a. Human – 10’ 

b. *Rat neurolemma – 50’ 

V. Discussion - 20’ 

VI. Future meetings – 5’

*Drs. John Clark (University of Massachusets and Steve Symington (Salve Regina University), 

collaborators with CAPHRA will lead these discussions.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9389 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to clarify the offense pertaining 

to illegal gratuities concerning programs receiving Federal funds. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 20, 2024 

Mr. JACKSON of North Carolina (for himself, Mr. CRENSHAW, and Mr. 

THANEDAR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to clarify the offense 

pertaining to illegal gratuities concerning programs receiving Federal funds. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Gratuities for Gov5 erning Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ILLEGAL GRATUITIES CONCERNING PROGRAMS RE7 CEIVING FEDERAL FUNDS. 

8 Section 666 of title 18, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9389 IH

1 (1) by redesignating subsections (b) through (d) 

2 as subsection (c) through (e), respectively; 

3 (2) in subsection (a)— 

4 (A) by striking ‘‘if the circumstance de5 scribed in subsection (b) of this section exists’’ 

6 and inserting ‘‘if the circumstance described in 

7 subsection (c) of this section exists’’; and 

8 (B) by striking ‘‘imprisoned not more than 

9 10 years,’’ and inserting ‘‘imprisoned not more 

10 than 15 years,’’; 

11 (3) by inserting after subsection (a) the fol12 lowing: 

13 ‘‘(b) Whoever, if the circumstance described in sub14 section (c) of this section exists— 

15 ‘‘(1) directly or indirectly, knowingly and pur16 posefully gives, offers, or promises anything of value 

17 of $1,000 or more to any agent of an organization, 

18 or of a State, local, or Indian tribal government, or 

19 any agency thereof, for or because of any official act 

20 performed by such agent in connection with any 

21 business, transaction, or series of transactions of 

22 such organization, government, or agency involving 

23 anything of value of $5,000 or more; or 

24 ‘‘(2) being an agent of an organization, or of a 

25 State, local, or Indian tribal government, or any 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 9389 IH

1 agency thereof, directly or indirectly, knowingly and 

2 purposefully demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or 

3 agrees to receive or accept anything of value of 

4 $1,000 or more personally for or because of any offi5 cial act performed by such agent in connection with 

6 any business, transaction, or series of transactions 

7 of such organization, government, or agency involv8 ing anything of value of $5,000 or more; 

9 shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 

10 2 years, or both.’’; and 

11 (4) in subsection (c), as redesignated, by strik12 ing ‘‘circumstance referred to in subsection (a)’’ and 

13 inserting ‘‘circumstances referred to in subsections 

14 (a) and (b)’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit
      32.2**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of OccuLogix, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William G.
      Dumencu, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




By: /s/
      William G. Dumencu


William G. Dumencu


Chief Financial Officer and


Treasurer




Dated:  March
      15,
      2007
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1730 When might BSEE approve partial structure removal or toppling in place? The Regional Supervisor may grant a departure from the requirement to remove a platform or other facility by approving partial structure removal or toppling in place for conversion to an artificial reef if you meet the following conditions: ( a ) The structure becomes part of a State artificial reef program, and the responsible State agency acquires a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and accepts title and liability for the structure; and
( b ) You satisfy any U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) navigational requirements for the structure.
§ 556.301 What is a Call for Information and Nominations? BOEM issues a Call for Information and Nominations (“Call”) on an area proposed for leasing in the Five Year program through publication in the Federal Register and other publications. A Call may include more than one proposed sale. Comments are requested from industry and the public on: ( a ) Industry interest in the area proposed for leasing, including nominations or indications of interest in specific blocks within the area;
( b ) Geological conditions, including bottom hazards;
( c ) Archaeological sites on the seabed or near shore;
( d ) Potential multiple uses of the proposed leasing area, including navigation, recreation, and fisheries;
( e ) Areas that should receive special concern and analysis; and
( f ) Other socioeconomic, biological, and environmental information.
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Radale Imports,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended June 30, 2005 (the
"Report"),  I, Lee D. Dodson,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  hereby
certify that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August 19, 2005
                                                      /s/ Lee D. Dodson
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Lee D. Dodson
                                                     Chief Financial Officer


         The above  certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350)  and is not being filed as
part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
§ 550.126 Electronic payment instructions. You must file all payments electronically through *Pay.gov.* This includes, but is not limited to, all OCS applications or filing fee payments. The *Pay.gov* Web site may be accessed through *Pay.gov* at *https://www.pay.gov/paygov/ .* ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) You must use credit card or automated clearing house (ACH) payments through the *Pay.gov* Web site, and you must include a copy of the *Pay.gov* confirmation receipt page with your application.
[76 FR 64623, Oct. 18, 2011, as amended at 80 FR 57096, Sept. 22, 2015]
§ 556.307 What does BOEM do with comments and recommendations received on the proposed notice of sale? ( a ) BOEM will consider all comments and recommendations received in response to the proposed notice of sale.
( b ) If the Secretary determines, after providing opportunity for consultation, that a governor's comments, and those of any affected local government, provide a reasonable balance between the national interest and the well-being of the citizens of the State, the Secretary will accept the recommendations of a State and/or local government(s). Any such determination of the national interest will be based on the findings, purposes and policies of the Act set forth in 43 U.S.C. 1332 and 43 U.S.C. 1801.
( c ) BOEM will send to each governor written reasons for its determination to accept or reject each governor's recommendation, and/or to implement any alternative means to provide for a reasonable balance between the national interest and the interests of the citizens of the State.