alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §15101. Transportation policy

(a) In General.—To ensure the development, coordination, and preservation of a transportation system that meets the transportation needs of the United States, including the national defense, it is the policy of the United States Government to oversee the modes of transportation and in overseeing those modes—

(1) to recognize and preserve the inherent advantage of each mode of transportation;

(2) to promote safe, adequate, economical, and efficient transportation;

(3) to encourage sound economic conditions in transportation, including sound economic conditions among carriers;

(4) to encourage the establishment and maintenance of reasonable rates for transportation without unreasonable discrimination or unfair or destructive competitive practices;

(5) to cooperate with each State and the officials of each State on transportation matters; and

(6) to encourage fair wages and working conditions in the transportation industry.

(b) Administration To Carry Out Policy.—This part shall be administered and enforced to carry out the policy of this section.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §106(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 921; amended Pub. L. 105–102, §2(13), Nov. 20, 1997, 111 Stat. 2205.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### Pub. L. 105–102

This amends 49:15101(a) to correct a grammatical error.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 10101 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

#### Amendments

1997—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 105–102 struck out "of" after "Government to oversee".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.

#### GAO Report

Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §106(b), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 932, directed the Comptroller General, within 3 years after Jan. 1, 1996, to transmit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report regarding the impact of regulations on the competitiveness of pipelines and to recommend whether to continue, revise, or sunset such regulations.
### §30125. Schoolbuses and schoolbus equipment

(a) Definitions.—In this section—

(1) "schoolbus" means a passenger motor vehicle designed to carry a driver and more than 10 passengers, that the Secretary of Transportation decides is likely to be used significantly to transport preprimary, primary, and secondary school students to or from school or an event related to school.

(2) "schoolbus equipment" means equipment designed primarily for a schoolbus or manufactured or sold to replace or improve a system, part, or component of a schoolbus or as an accessory or addition to a schoolbus.

(b) Standards.—The Secretary shall prescribe motor vehicle safety standards for schoolbuses and schoolbus equipment manufactured in, or imported into, the United States. Standards shall include minimum performance requirements for—

(1) emergency exits;

(2) interior protection for occupants;

(3) floor strength;

(4) seating systems;

(5) crashworthiness of body and frame (including protection against rollover hazards);

(6) vehicle operating systems;

(7) windows and windshields; and

(8) fuel systems.

(c) Test Driving by Manufacturers.—The Secretary may require by regulation a schoolbus to be test-driven by a manufacturer before introduction in commerce.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 957.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30125(a) | 15:1391(14), (15). | Sept. 9, 1966, Pub. L. 89–563, 80 Stat. 718, §102(14), (15); added Oct. 27, 1974, Pub. L. 93–492, §201, 88 Stat. 1484. |
| 30125(b) | 15:1392(i)(1). | Sept. 9, 1966, Pub. L. 89–563, 80 Stat. 718, §103(i)(1), (2); added Oct. 27, 1974, Pub. L. 93–492, §202, 88 Stat. 1484; July 8, 1976, Pub. L. 94–346, §2, 90 Stat. 815. |
| 30125(c) | 15:1392(i)(2). | |
| | 15:1397(a)(1)(F). | Sept. 9, 1966, Pub. L. 89–563, 80 Stat. 718, §108(a)(1)(F); added Oct. 27, 1974, Pub. L. 93–492, §203, 88 Stat. 1485. |

Section

In subsection (a)(1), the words "the purpose of" are omitted as surplus.

In subsection (a)(2), the words "any similar part or component" are omitted as surplus.

In subsection (b), before clause (1), the text of 15:1392(i)(1)(A) (1st sentence) and (B) (words before 2d comma) is omitted as executed. The word "prescribe" is substituted for "promulgate", and the word "Federal" is omitted, for consistency. The words "Such proposed standards" and "those aspects of performance set out in clauses (i) through (viii) of subparagraph (A) of this paragraph" are omitted because of the restatement. The word "requirements" is substituted for "standards" to avoid using "standards" in 2 different ways. The text of 15:1392(i)(1)(B) (last 6 words) is omitted as executed.

In subsection (c), the text of 15:1397(a)(1)(F) is omitted as unnecessary because of the restatement.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of OccuLogix, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eric Donsky, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




By:
              /s/
      Eric DonskyEric
      DonskyChief
      Executive Officer





Dated:     March
31, 2009
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:November
                8, 2007
            By:
            */s/
              Frank J. Pazera*Name:Frank
                J. Pazera
                Title:Chief
                  Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. and will be
      retained by NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         501,306
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,091
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               811,220
<PP&E>                                      21,722,457
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,594,027
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,201,548
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          407,406
<BONDS>                                     13,171,774
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,622,368<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,201,548
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,379,186
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,232,018
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,274,787
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (127,619)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (127,619)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (127,619)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.30)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

<FN>
<F1>This entity is a limited partnership. The Other Stockholders Equity line
represents total Partnership equity.
<F2>The EPS-Primary line represents net loss per limited partnership unit.
</FN>

        


</TABLE>
§ 44.40 Motion for summary decision. ( a ) Any party may, at least 20 days before the date fixed for any hearing under Subpart C of this part, move with or without supporting affidavits for a summary decision on all or any part of the proceeding. Any other party may, within 10 days after service of the motion, serve opposing affidavits or countermove for summary decision. The administrative law judge may set the matter for argument and call for submission of briefs.
( b ) Filing of any documents under paragraph (a) of this section shall be with the administrative law judge, and copies of such documents shall be served in accordance with § 44.6 of this part.
( c ) Any affidavits submitted with the motion shall set forth such facts as would be admissible in evidence in a proceeding subject to 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557 and shall show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated therein. When a motion for summary decision is made and supported as provided in this section, a party opposing the motion may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials of such pleading. Such response must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue of fact for the hearing.
( d ) The administrative law judge may grant the motion if the pleadings, affidavits, material obtained by discovery or otherwise, or matters officially noticed show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and a party is entitled to summary decision. The administrative law judge may deny the motion whenever the moving party denies access to information by means of discovery to a party opposing the motion.
( e ) The denial of all or part of a motion for summary decision by the administrative law judge shall not be subject to interlocutory appeal to the Assistant Secretary unless the administrative law judge certifies in writing that ( 1 ) the ruling involves an important question of law or policy as to which there are substantial grounds for difference of opinion, and
( 2 ) an immediate appeal from the ruling may materially advance termination of the proceeding. The allowance of an interlocutory appeal shall not stay the proceedings before the administrative law judge unless ordered by the Assistant Secretary.
Exhibit
      32.2




**CERTIFICATION**




I,
      Joseph
      Restivo, Chief Financial Officer of GVI Security Solutions, Inc. (the
“Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
      knowledge:




(i)
      The
      Company’s accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended
      September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(ii)
      The
      information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Joseph RestivoJoseph
                RestivoChief
                Financial Officer




Dated:
      November 13, 2008
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.601 Definitions. When used in this subpart, the following terms shall have the meanings given below: *Expected surface pressure* means the highest pressure predicted to be exerted upon the surface of a well. In calculating expected surface pressure, you must consider reservoir pressure as well as applied surface pressure.
*Routine operations* mean any of the following operations conducted on a well with the tree installed: ( a ) Cutting paraffin;
( b ) Removing and setting pump-through-type tubing plugs, gas-lift valves, and subsurface safety valves which can be removed by wireline operations;
( c ) Bailing sand;
( d ) Pressure surveys;
( e ) Swabbing;
( f ) Scale or corrosion treatment;
( g ) Caliper and gauge surveys;
( h ) Corrosion inhibitor treatment;
( i ) Removing or replacing subsurface pumps;
( j ) Through-tubing logging (diagnostics);
( k ) Wireline fishing; and
( l ) Setting and retrieving other subsurface flow-control devices.
( m ) Acid treatments.
*Workover operations* mean the work conducted on wells after the initial completion for the purpose of maintaining or restoring the productivity of a well.
[76 FR 64462, Oct. 18, 2011, as amended at 84 FR 21976, May 15, 2019]
#### § 556.521 When is my lease effective?

Your lease is effective on the first day of the month following the date that BOEM executes the lease. You may request in writing, before BOEM executes the lease, that your lease be effective as of the first day of the month in which BOEM executes the lease. If BOEM agrees to make the lease effective as of the earlier date, BOEM will so indicate when it executes the lease.
#### Midland Operating Company, for use of Midland Investment Company, appellee, v. Midland Casualty Company, formerly named Badger Casualty Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 23,379.

Action in assumpsit, remanded and re-tried on stipulation of facts without jury. ' Finding for plaintiff. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph Sabath, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1923.

Reversed with finding of facts.

Opinion filed November 27, 1923.

*Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Miller, Gorham, Wales & Noxon and Orlaf Anderson, for appellant. Cleland, Lee & Phelps, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3567

To provide for certain tunnel life safety and rehabilitation projects for 

Amtrak. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2005

Mr. KING of New York (for himself and Mr. PASCRELL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure 

A BILL

To provide for certain tunnel life safety and rehabilitation 

projects for Amtrak.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Northeast Corridor 

5 Rail Tunnel Safety Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

7 There are authorized to be appropriated to the Sec8 retary of Transportation $898,000,000, to remain avail9 able until expended, for the use of Amtrak to complete 
2

•HR 3567 IH 

1 New York tunnel life safety projects and to rehabilitate 

2 tunnels in Washington, DC and Baltimore, Maryland. 

3 SEC. 3. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS. 

4 The Secretary shall not make funds appropriated 

5 under section 2 available to Amtrak for a project unless 

6 the Secretary has received from Amtrak and has approved 

7 an engineering and financial plan for that project. 

8 SEC. 4. INSPECTOR GENERAL REVIEW. 

9 The Inspector General of the Department of Trans10 portation shall conduct and transmit to the Congress an 

11 annual review to determine whether the expenditure and 

12 obligation of funds made available under this Act are con13 sistent with the purposes for which those funds are made 

14 available.

Æ
#### Acme Supply Co., Ltd., Respondent, v City of New York, Appellant.

[834 NYS2d 142]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, *332J.H.O.), entered September 19, 2005, which granted plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment, severed the remainder of the action, ordered that the action proceed to discovery and effectively denied defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, plaintiffs motion denied, defendant’s cross motion granted and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

The parties’ agreement for plaintiff to supply defendant with towels was a standard City requirements contract containing a broad dispute resolution clause that mandated a three-step procedure prior to a claimant seeking limited judicial review of whether the administrative determination was in violation of lawful procedures, was affected by an error of law, or was arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion. Upon rejection of, and nonpayment for, several shipments of its towels, plaintiff pursued the first two steps of the procedure, bringing the dispute before the agency head of the Department of Citywide Administrative Services and then the City Comptroller, who each found against plaintiff. Instead of submitting the dispute to the Contract Dispute Resolution Board for the third-step review, plaintiff commenced this plenary action.

The complaint should have been dismissed because plaintiff failed to comply fully with the contractual dispute resolution procedure. In an effort to evade this requirement, plaintiff proffers interpretations of individual provisions of the procedure that are inconsistent with its plain intent and violative of basic principles of contractual construction. “[A] court should not ‘adopt an interpretation’ which will operate to leave a ‘provision of a contract . . . without force and effect’ ” *(Corhill Corp. v S.D. Plants, Inc.,*9 NY2d 595, 599 [1961]). “An interpretation that gives effect to all the terms of an agreement is preferable to one that ignores terms or accords them an unreasonable interpretation” *(Ruttenberg v Davidge Data Sys. Corp.,*215 AD2d 191, 196 [1995]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Williams, McGuire and Kavanagh, JJ.
[ARTICLE] 5
[CIK] 0000760386
[NAME] WELLESLEY LEASE INCOME LTD PARTNERSHIP III-D FDS 12/31/99
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   12-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1999
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1999
[CASH]                                         421,949
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                   56,017
[ALLOWANCES]                                     1,087
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                               476,879
[PP&E]                                       1,002,046
[DEPRECIATION]                                 793,493
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                 685,432
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                           39,400
[BONDS]                                          3,947
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                        8,988,039
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                             0
[OTHER-SE]                                 (8,345,954)
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                   685,432
[SALES]                                        866,790
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                               849,165
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                   63,383
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                               692,261
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                   149
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                               7,245
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                 86,127
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                             86,127
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                    86,127
[EPS-BASIC]                                       2.82
[EPS-DILUTED]                                        0
</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 982
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999, and at 89 FR 38293, May 7, 2024.

§ 982.618 Shared housing: Housing quality standards. ( a ) *Compliance with HQS.* The PHA may not give approval to reside in shared housing unless the entire unit, including the portion of the unit available for use by the assisted family under its lease, meets HQS.
( b ) *Applicable HQS standards.* As defined in § 982.4, HQS refers to the minimum quality standards developed by HUD in accordance with 24 CFR 5.703 for housing assisted under the HCV program, including any variations approved by HUD for the PHA under 24 CFR 5.705(a)(3). However, the HQS standards in this section apply in place of standards related to space and security in 24 CFR 5.703.
( c ) *Facilities available for family.* The facilities available for the use of an assisted family in shared housing under the family's lease must include (whether in the family's private space or in the common space) a living room, sanitary facilities in accordance with the standards set in 24 CFR 5.703, and food preparation and refuse disposal facilities in accordance with 24 CFR 5.703.
( d ) *Space and security: Performance requirements.* ( 1 ) The entire unit must provide adequate space and security for all its residents (whether assisted or unassisted).
( 2 ) ( i ) Each unit must contain private space for each assisted family, plus common space for shared use by the residents of the unit. Common space must be appropriate for shared use by the residents.
( ii ) The private space for each assisted family must contain at least one bedroom for each two persons in the family. The number of bedrooms in the private space of an assisted family may not be less than the family unit size.
( iii ) A zero or one bedroom unit may not be used for shared housing.
[63 FR 23865, Apr. 30, 1998, as amended at 88 FR 30504, May 11, 2023; 89 FR 38303, May 7, 2024]