alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. ("Company")") Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 ("Report"), the
undersigned certifies that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 14, 2008

By: /s/ JASON MEYERS
--------------------------
Co-Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of
Cambridge Display Technology, Inc.:



| | 1) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-122167) pertaining to the CDT Acquisition Corp. Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan and the Cambridge Display Technology, Inc.
2004 Stock Incentive Plan
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-131208)
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------



| | 3) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-134921)
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------

of our report
dated March 1, 2007, with respect to the 2006 & 2005 consolidated financial statements of Cambridge Display Technology, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006.

/s/ Ernst and Young LLP

ERNST AND YOUNG LLP

Cambridge, England

March 1, 2007
#### § 240.6 Transferability of Guarantee; Note Register.

A Noteholder may assign, transfer or pledge an Eligible Note to any Person. Any such assignment, transfer or pledge shall be effective on the date that the name of the new Noteholder is entered on the Note Register. USAID shall be entitled to treat the Persons in whose names the Eligible Notes are registered as the owners thereof for all purposes of this Guarantee and USAID shall not be affected by notice to the contrary.
### §733b. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Prior to the enactment of the Nationality Act of 1940, act Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 876, 54 Stat. 1137, this section, act Mar. 2, 1917, ch. 145, §5b, as added June 27, 1934, ch. 845, 48 Stat. 1245, provided as follows: "All persons born in Puerto Rico on or after April 11, 1899 (whether before or after June 27, 1934) and not citizens, subjects, or nationals of any foreign power, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States: Provided, That this section shall not be construed as depriving any person, native of Puerto Rico, of his or her American citizenship heretofore otherwise lawfully acquired by such person; or to extend such citizenship to persons who shall have renounced or lost it under the treaties and/or laws of the United States or who are now residing permanently abroad and are citizens or subjects of a foreign country: And provided further, That any woman, native of Puerto Rico and permanently residing therein, who, prior to March 2, 1917, had lost her American nationality by reason of her marriage to an alien eligible to citizenship, or by reason of the loss of the United States citizenship by her husband, may be naturalized under the provisions of section 369 of title 8."

The second proviso thereof was repealed by section 504 of the Nationality Act of 1940. Provisions relating to citizenship of persons born in Puerto Rico, are contained in section 1402 of Title 8, Aliens and Nationality.
§ 285.1014 When will BSEE suspend an Alternate Use RUE? ( a ) BSEE may suspend an Alternate Use RUE if: ( 1 ) Necessary to comply with judicial decrees;
( 2 ) Continued activities pursuant to the Alternate Use RUE pose an imminent threat of serious or irreparable harm or damage to natural resources; life (including human and wildlife); property; the marine, coastal, or human environment; or sites, structures, or objects of historical or archaeological significance; or
( 3 ) Operation of the existing OCS facility that is subject to the Alternate Use RUE has been suspended or temporarily prohibited and we have determined that continued activities under the Alternate Use RUE are unsafe or cause undue interference with the operation of the original OCS Lands Act approved activity.
( b ) A suspension will extend the term of your Alternate Use RUE grant for the period of the suspension.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-3706

___________________________

Estate of Marjory Gail Thomas Osborn-Vincent

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

Lesa Benacquisto; Daniel Benacquisto; Richard Thoresen; Elizabeth Thoresen;

Arnold Mork; Isabella Mork; Ronald Melchert; Susan Melchert, on behalf of

themselves and all others similarly situated

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs

v.

American Express Financial Corporation; American Express Financial Advisors,

Inc.; American Centurion Life Assurance Company; American Enterprise Life

Insurance Company; American Partners Life Insurance Company; IDS Life

Insurance Company; IDS Life Insurance Company of New York

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota

 ____________

 Submitted: December 17, 2020

Filed: February 4, 2021

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, ERICKSON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________
PER CURIAM.

Marjory Gail Thomas Osborn-Vincent was a member of a class certified in the

District of Minnesota. The action involved alleged misrepresentations made by

defendants while marketing, selling, administering, and servicing various life

insurance and annuity products. A settlement agreement approved by the court in

2001 contained a release which applied to, in relevant part, “all Class Members, on

behalf of themselves and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, [and]

successors” and covered conduct that included “any and all past or present” claims

that “are based upon, related to, or connected with, directly or indirectly, in whole or

in part,” the facts and allegations underlying the lawsuit. The court retained

jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement. 

After Osborn-Vincent died in 2016, her Estate brought suit in Oregon asserting

various fraud claims against defendants based on Osborn-Vincent’s purchase of a life

insurance policy. Defendants moved the district court in Minnesota to enforce the

settlement agreement and enjoin the Estate of Osborn-Vincent from pursuing its

claims in Oregon on the ground that Osborn-Vincent waived the claims as part of the

settlement agreement. The district court agreed and entered an order enjoining the

Estate of Osborn-Vincent. Osborn-Vincent appeals. 

For a federal court to have personal jurisdiction over a party, the party must be

properly served under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Adams v. AlliedSignal Gen. Aviation

Avionics, 74 F.3d 882, 885 (8th Cir. 1996) (concluding the district court lacked

jurisdiction over an improperly served party regardless of whether or not the party

had notice of the lawsuit). Here, defendants never effected service under Rule 4

against the party that they sought to enjoin: the personal representative of the Estate

of Osborn-Vincent. In addition, although permissible under Fed. R. Civ. P. 25, the

defendants never moved to substitute the personal representative of Osborn-Vincent’s

estate as a party. 

-2-
We remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 

______________________________

-3-
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### §§ 250.843-250.849 [Reserved]
Order 2011-1-20

Served: January 21, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation 

on the 21st day of January, 2011

Application of 

 WINGS AIRWAYS, INC.

for a certificate of public convenience and necessity 

under 49 U.S.C. § 41102

Docket DOT-OST-2010-0023

ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION 

On January 25, 2010, Wings Airways, Inc. (“Wings”), an air taxi operator based in Juneau, 

Alaska, filed an application in Docket DOT-OST-2010-0023 for certificate authority to engage 

in interstate scheduled air transportation of persons, property, and mail under 49 U.S.C. § 41102

of the Transportation Code (“the Statute”).

Various pleadings, including answers opposing Wing’s application, were filed in the docket, 

most recently on December 20, 2010.

On January 19, 2011, Wings filed a motion in the docket requesting that the Department dismiss 

its application without prejudice. 

In light of the above, the Department dismisses, without prejudice, the application filed in 

Docket DOT-OST-2010-0023 by Wings. We invite Wings to refile its application when it is 

fully prepared to prosecute its application. 

ACCORDINGLY, acting under authority assigned by the Department in its Regulations,

14 CFR § 385.12:

1. We dismiss, without prejudice, the application filed in Docket DOT-OST-2010-0023 by 

Wings Airways, Inc., for a certificate of public convenience and necessity to engage in interstate 

scheduled air transportation of persons, property and mail pursuant to section 41102 of the 

Statute. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
2

2. We will serve a copy of this order on the persons listed in Attachment A.

By:

TODD M. HOMAN

Director

Office of Aviation Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http://www.regulations.gov
SERVICE LIST FOR

WINGS AIRWAYS, INC.

 

Attachment A

MS HOLLY JOHNSON

PRESIDENT

WINGS AIRWAYS

2 MARINE WAY SUITE 175

JUNEAU ALASKA 99801

MR CLAY MORITZ

OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RSPA/BTS E-36 

1200 NEW JERSEY AVENUE SE 

RTS-42

WASHINGTON DC 20590

MR CRAIG LOKEN

ALASKA SEAPLANES SERVICES

8995 YANDUKIN DRIVE

 JUNEAU ALASKA 99801

MR DOUGLAS WAHTO

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

JUNEAU FSDO

3032 VINTAGE PARK BOULEVARD

JUNEAU ALASKA 99801

MR WILLIAM J WEBER

CERTIFICATION SECTION MANAGER

FAA AFS-900

45005 AVIATION DRIVE

SUITE 131

DULLES VA 20166

MR MIKE LOVERINK

AIR EXURSION LLC

1873 SHELL SIMMONS DRIVE

SUITE 115

JUNEAU ALASKA 99801

MR MICHAEL STEDMAN

WINGS AIRWAYS

2 MARINE WAY 

SUITE 175

JUNEAU ALASKA 99801

 

 MR PETER LYNCH

 ASST CHIEF COUNSEL FOR 

 ENFORCEMENT AGC-300

 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

 800 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE SW

 WASHINGTON DC 20591

MR ROB MCKINNEY

ALASKA JUNEAU 

AERONAUTICS INC

7505 NE AIRPORT WAY

PORTLAND OR 97218

MR HANK MYERS 

MTC

PO BOX 7142

BELLEVUE WA 98008
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of MAI SystemsCorporation (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,James D. Dolan, Chief Financial and Operating Officer of the Company, certifypursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: September 21, 2005 | By:    | /s/ James W.  Dolan                    |
|-------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                          |   | James W.  Dolan                        |
|                          |   | Chief  Financial and Operating Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-25-1997
<CASH>                                           1,496
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,876
<ALLOWANCES>                                       195
<INVENTORY>                                     58,666
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,536
<PP&E>                                          12,167
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,354
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 116,353
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,024
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,417
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   116,353
<SALES>                                        141,001
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               141,001
<CGS>                                           92,655
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,655
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                37,839
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 570
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,927
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,839
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,088
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,088
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### §§175, 175a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 175 and 175a, relating to Territory of Alaska, were omitted in view of admission of Alaska into the Union.

Section 175, act July 31, 1946, ch. 719, §1, 60 Stat. 750, authorized establishment of a geophysical institute at the University of Alaska.

Section 175a, act July 31, 1946, ch. 719, §2, 60 Stat. 751, provided that buildings and equipment of geophysical institute shall become property of University of Alaska.
§ 254.90 What are the additional requirements for exercises of your response personnel and equipment for facilities conducting exploratory drilling from a MODU on the Arctic OCS? In addition to the requirements in § 254.42, the following requirements apply to exercises for your response personnel and equipment for facilities conducting exploratory drilling from a MODU on the Arctic OCS: ( a ) You must incorporate the personnel, materials, and equipment identified in § 254.70(a), the safe working practices identified in § 254.70(b), the ice intervention practices described in § 254.80(a), the offshore-based response requirements in § 254.80(b), and the resource tracking requirements in § 254.80(c) into your spill-response training and exercise activities.
( b ) For each season in which you plan to conduct exploratory drilling operations from a MODU on the Arctic OCS, you must notify the Regional Supervisor 60 days prior to handling, storing, or transporting oil.
( c ) After the Regional Supervisor receives notice pursuant to § 254.90(b), the Regional Supervisor may direct you to deploy and operate your spill response equipment and/or your capping stack, cap and flow system, and containment dome, and other similar subsea and surface devices and equipment and vessels, as part of announced or unannounced exercises or compliance inspections. For the purposes of this section, spill response equipment does not include the use of blowout preventers, diverters, heavy weight mud to kill the well, relief wells, or other similar conventional well control options.
Editorial Note on Part 1206
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1206 (formerly part 206) appear at 67 FR 19111, Apr. 18, 2002.

§ 1206.61 How will ONRR determine if my royalty payments are correct? ( a ) ( 1 ) ONRR may monitor, review, and audit the royalties that you report, and, if ONRR determines that your reported value is inconsistent with the requirements of this subpart, ONRR may direct you to use a different measure of royalty value.
( 2 ) If ONRR directs you to use a different royalty value, you must pay any additional royalties due plus late payment interest calculated under § 1218.54 of this chapter, or you may report a credit for, or request a refund of, any overpaid royalties without interest under § 1218.53 of this chapter.
( b ) When the provisions in this subpart refer to gross proceeds, in conducting reviews and audits, ONRR will examine if your or your affiliate's contract reflects the total consideration actually transferred, either directly or indirectly, from the buyer to you or your affiliate for the oil. If ONRR determines that a contract does not reflect the total consideration, you must value the oil sold as the total consideration accruing to you or your affiliate.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Radale Imports, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ken Swanson,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
      the
      best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      August 19, 2008


*/s/
                  Ken Swanson*Ken
                  SwansonChief
                  Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Radale Imports, Inc. and will be retained by Radale Imports, Inc. and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT  23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
MAI Systems Corporation:

   
The audits referred to in our report dated March 27, 1997, included the related
financial statement schedule as of December 31, 1996, and for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, included in the annual report
on Form 10-K/A. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this
financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects
the information set forth therein.
    

We consent to the use of our reports included herein and incorporated herein
by reference.

   
/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
April 17, 1997
### §352. Authority to carry out certain transferred duties and powers

In carrying out a duty or power transferred under the Department of Transportation Act (Public Law 89–670, 80 Stat. 931), the Secretary of Transportation and the Administrators of the Federal Railroad Administration, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, and the Federal Aviation Administration have the same authority that was vested in the department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States Government carrying out the duty or power immediately before the transfer. An action of the Secretary or Administrator in carrying out the duty or power has the same effect as when carried out by the department, agency, or instrumentality.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §4(j)(10)(A), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1368; Pub. L. 109–59, title IV, §4125(c), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1738.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 352 | 49 App.:1653(d). | Oct. 15, 1966, Pub. L. 89–670, §4(d), 80 Stat. 934. |

Section

The words "force and" are omitted as surplus.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Department of Transportation Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 89–670, Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 931, which was classified principally to sections 1651 to 1660 of former Title 49, Transportation. The Act was repealed and the provisions thereof reenacted in Title 49, Transportation, by Pub. L. 97–449, Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2413, and Pub. L. 103–272, July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 745. The Act was also repealed by Pub. L. 104–287, §7(5), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3400. For disposition of sections of former Title 49, see Table at the beginning of Title 49.

#### Amendments

2005—Pub. L. 109–59 substituted "Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration" for "Federal Highway Administration".