alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Tumbleweed Communications Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Timothy G.
Conley, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 9, 2004



|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ TIMOTHY G. CONLEY                                                         
|Timothy G. Conley Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer



This certification
accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of NeoMedia  Technologies,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each
of the undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.

Date: August 13, 2003                By: /s/ David A. Dodge
      ---------------                    ------------------
                                     Name: David A. Dodge
                                     Title: Vice-President, Chief Financial
                                     Officer, Controller

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or
other  document  authentications,   acknowledging,  or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
### §393a. Long-range planning for facilities

(a) The Secretary, in consultation with the Corporation, public telecommunications entities, and as appropriate with other parties, shall develop a long-range plan to accomplish the objectives set forth in section 390 of this title. Such plan shall include a detailed 5-year projection of the broadcast and nonbroadcast public telecommunications facilities required to meet such objectives, and the expenditures necessary to provide such facilities.

(b) Repealed. Pub. L. 104–66, title I, §1021(a), Dec. 21, 1995, 109 Stat. 712.

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title III, §393A, formerly §396, as added Pub. L. 87–447, May 1, 1962, 76 Stat. 67; renumbered §394 and amended Pub. L. 90–129, title II, §201(2), (4), Nov. 7, 1967, 81 Stat. 367; Pub. L. 95–567, title I, §105, Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2409; renumbered §393A, Pub. L. 101–437, title II, §203(a)(1), Oct. 17, 1990, 104 Stat. 998; Pub. L. 104–66, title I, §1021(a), Dec. 21, 1995, 109 Stat. 712.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1995—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 104–66 struck out subsec. (b) which read as follows: "The plan required in subsection (a) of this section shall be updated annually, and a summary of the activities of the Secretary in implementing the plan, shall be submitted concurrently to the President and the Congress not later than the 31st day of December of each year."

1978—Pub. L. 95–567 substituted provisions dealing with long-range planning for facilities for provisions authorizing the Secretary to establish rules and regulations necessary for this subpart. See section 392(e) of this title.

1967—Pub. L. 90–129, §201(2), substituted "subpart" for "part".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1978 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 95–567 effective Nov. 2, 1978, see section 403 of Pub. L. 95–567, set out as a note under section 390 of this title.
#### PASE, Respondent, v. CALLANAN, Appellant, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 13, 1903.)

Action by Henry Pase against Thomas Callanan and another.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
###### Editorial Note on [Part 250](/current/title-30/part-250?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at [77 FR 50891](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/77-FR-50891), Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.839 What are the maximum allowable valve closure times and hydraulic bleeding requirements for a direct-hydraulic control system?

(a) If you have a direct-hydraulic control system, you must:

(1) Design the subsea control system to meet the valve closure times listed in this section or your approved DWOP; and

(2) Verify the valve closure times upon installation. The District Manager may require you to verify the closure time of the USV(s) through visual authentication by diver or ROV.

(b) You must comply with the maximum allowable valve closure times and hydraulic system bleeding requirements listed in the following table or your approved DWOP:

Valve Closure Timing, Direct-Hydraulic Control System

| If you have the following. . . | Your pipeline BSDV must. . . | Your USV1 must. . . | Your USV2 must. . . | Your alternate isolation valve must. . . | Your surface-controlled SSSV must. . . | Your LP hydraulic system must. . . | Your HP hydraulic system must. . . |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (1) Process upset | Close within 45 seconds after sensor activation | [no requirements] | | | [no requirements] | [no requirements] | [no requirements] |
| (2) Flowline PSHL | Close within 45 seconds after sensor activation | Close one or more valves within 2 minutes and 45 seconds after sensor activation. Close the designated USV1 within 20 minutes after sensor activation. | | | Close within 24 hours after sensor activation | Complete bleed of USV1, USV2, and the AIV within 20 minutes after sensor activation | Complete bleed within 24 hours after sensor activation. |
| (3) ESD/TSE (Platform) | Close within 45 seconds after ESD or sensor activation | Close all valves within 20 minutes after ESD or sensor activation. | | | Close within 60 minutes after ESD or sensor activation | Complete bleed of USV1, USV2, and the AIV within 20 minutes after ESD or sensor activation | Complete bleed within 60 minutes after ESD or sensor activation. |
| (4) Subsea ESD (Platform) or BSDV TSE | Close within 45 seconds after ESD or sensor activation | Close one or more valves within 2 minutes and 45 seconds after ESD or sensor activation. Close all tree valves within 10 minutes after ESD or sensor activation. | | | Close within 10 minutes after ESD or sensor activation | Complete bleed of USV1, USV2, and the AIV within 10 minutes after ESD or sensor activation | Complete bleed within 10 minutes after ESD or sensor activation. |
| (5) Subsea ESD (MODU or other type of workover vessel), Dropped object | [no requirements] | Initiate closure immediately. If desired, you may allow for closure of the tree valves immediately prior to closure of the surface-controlled SSSV. | | | | Initiate unrestricted bleed immediately | Initiate unrestricted bleed immediately. |
Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATION


I, JOHN P. GRAZER, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
 periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Ameriquest
 Mortgage Securities, Inc. 2004-R8:

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling
and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion is included in these
reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement and based upon my
knowledge and the annual compliance required under that agreement, and except
as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
that agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
report provided by and independent public account, after conducting a review
in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company.

<page>



Date: March 1, 2005

AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC.


/s/: John P Grazer
John P Grazer
CFO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,403
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,425
<ALLOWANCES>                                       124
<INVENTORY>                                         67
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,510
<PP&E>                                           3,776
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,183
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,103
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,972
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,174
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,024)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,103
<SALES>                                         11,825
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,825
<CGS>                                           10,465
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,465
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,792
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    60
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  52
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,544)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (45)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,499)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,499)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.40)
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-20194

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BONIFACIO HERNANDEZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:06-CR-89-1

Before KING, DAVIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Bonifacio Hernandez appeals the sentences imposed following his guiltyplea convictions for conspiracy to possess with intentto distribute five kilograms

or more of cocaine and possession with intent to distribute five kilograms or

more of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(ii), 846 and 18

U.S.C. § 2. He argues that the district court clearly erred in calculating the

amount of drugs attributable to him as relevant conduct under United States

Sentencing Guidelines § 1B1.3 and that the district court erred in failing to

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 7, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-20194

2

make the necessary finding of the scope of his agreement with his coconspirators. We review the district court’s drug quantity calculation for clear

error. United States v. Schorovsky, 202 F.3d 727, 729 (5th Cir. 2000). 

Hernandez claims that, in connection with the drug conspiracy, he was

involved only with 9.9 kilograms of cocaine seized from a van occupied by his coconspirators and that he had no knowledge of the 29.4 kilograms of cocaine that

were seized by law enforcement officers from a residence at 8915 Alejo in

Houston, Texas. The facts admitted by Hernandez during his rearraignment

and contained in the presentence report established, however, that Hernandez

met with his co-conspirators at a restaurant to discuss a cocaine deal, that he

was present at the Alejo residence when 34.8 kilograms of cocaine were

packaged for distribution, and that he stayed in the residence after the 9.9

kilograms were taken from the residence by others in the van. Hernandez’s

assertion that he was involved only with the 9.9 kilograms in the van is belied

by the fact that he was not in the van when it was stopped and the fact that he

stayed behind at the Alejo residence with a much larger amount of cocaine. 

Given the undisputed facts before the district court, it was plausible from

the record as a whole for the district courtto find that Hernandez should be held

accountable for the 24.9 kilograms of cocaine found in the Alejo residence.

See § 1B1.3(a)(1) , comment. (n.2); Burton v. United States, 237 F.3d 490, 500

(5th Cir. 2000); United States v. Duncan, 191 F.3d 569, 577 (5th Cir. 1999). As

it was not clearly erroneous for the district court to conclude that the cocaine

found in the Alejo residence was within the scope of the jointly undertaken

criminal activity by Hernandez and his co-conspirators, his sentences are

AFFIRMED.
#### § 35.11 Material required for record.

MSHA may retain for record all or part of the material submitted for testing. Any material that MSHA does not require will be returned to the applicant at his expense upon receipt of his written request and shipping instructions not more than 6 months after the termination or completion of the tests. Thereafter MSHA will dispose of such surplus material as it deems appropriate.
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1503 What are my general responsibilities for training? ( a ) You must establish and implement a training program so that all of your employees are trained to competently perform their assigned well control, deepwater well control, and production safety duties. You must verify that your employees understand and can perform the assigned well control, deepwater well control, or production safety duties.
( b ) If you conduct operations with a subsea BOP stack, your employees and contract personnel must be trained in deepwater well control. The trained employees and contract personnel must have a comprehensive knowledge of deepwater well control equipment, practices, and theory.
( c ) You must have a training plan that specifies the type, method(s), length, frequency, and content of the training for your employees. Your training plan must specify the method(s) of verifying employee understanding and performance. This plan must include at least the following information: ( 1 ) Procedures for training employees in well control, deepwater well control, or production safety practices;
( 2 ) Procedures for evaluating the training programs of your contractors;
( 3 ) Procedures for verifying that all employees and contractor personnel engaged in well control, deepwater well control, or production safety operations can perform their assigned duties;
( 4 ) Procedures for assessing the training needs of your employees on a periodic basis;
( 5 ) Recordkeeping and documentation procedures; and
( 6 ) Internal audit procedures.
( d ) Upon request of the District Manager or Regional Supervisor, you must provide: ( 1 ) Copies of training documentation for personnel involved in well control, deepwater well control, or production safety operations during the past 5 years; and
( 2 ) A copy of your training plan.
### §15506. Facilities for interchange of traffic

A pipeline carrier providing transportation subject to this part shall provide reasonable, proper, and equal facilities that are within its power to provide for the interchange of traffic between, and for the receiving, forwarding, and delivering of property to and from, its respective line and a connecting line of a pipeline, rail, or water carrier under this subtitle.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §106(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 924.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 10742 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Vito Russo, Appellant.

In a *coram nobis*proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the County Court, Nassau County, dated October 17, 1961, which denied, without a hearing, his application to vacate a judgment of said court, rendered January 16, 1961 on his plea of guilty, convicting him of attempted burglary in the third degree, and sentencing him as a third felony offender to serve a term of 5 to 10 years. Order affirmed. Defendant claims that at his trial for burglary in the third degree he pleaded guilty, at the close of the People’s case, to the reduced charge of attempted burglary because the jury had been drawn from a panel which overheard a Judge other than the Trial Judge reprimand him. Defendant’s remedy was the *voir dire*examination of the jurors. No *822motion for a mistrial was made. The moving papers and the record make it plain that the reason for defendant’s plea to a reduced charge was the strong likelihood that, having been apprehended by a policeman at night while trying to pry open a safe, he would be convicted of burglary and sentenced as a fourth offender. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0796 

_____________________________

MIQUEL D. PAYTON, SR,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT 

OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT 

PROGRAM and CRYSTAL 

COLLEEN BROWN,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Division of Administrative Hearings.

Garnett W. Chisenhall, Administrative Law Judge.

March 19, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and RAY and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Miquel Devante Payton, Sr, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellees.
#### § 36.13 Withdrawal of certification.

MSHA reserves the right to rescind for cause any certificate of approval granted under this part.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with  the  accompanying Quarterly Report of Radale Imports,
Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 (the
"Report"),  I,  Lee  D.  Dodson,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify  that  to  my  knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                                           /s/  Lee  D.  Dodson
Dated:  February  17,  2004                -------------------------------------
                                           Lee  D.  Dodson
                                           Chief  Financial  Officer


     The  above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the  Form  10-Q  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.









                                                                    Exhibit 32.1
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
Exhibit 15.2

[Letterhead of Fangda Partners]

June 28, 2007

The9 Limited

Building No.3

690 Bibo Road

Zhangjiang Hi-tech Park, Pudong New Area

Shanghai, Peoples Republic of China

Dear Sirs,

We consent to the reference to our firm under the headings Risk Factors, Government Regulations and Related Party Transactions  Arrangements with Affiliated PRC Entitiesin The9
Limiteds Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in the month of June 2007.



|                   
|-------------------
|Yours faithfully,  
|                   
|/s/ Fangda Partners
|Fangda Partners