alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Robert V. Johnson, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of FCStone Group, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|    |  |                                                                        
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Robert V. Johnson                                                  
|    |  | Robert V. Johnson Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)



Date: November 29, 2007
#### § 254.8 May I appeal decisions under this part?

See 30 CFR part 290 for instructions on how to appeal any order or decision that we issue under this part.
#### New Haven Savings Bank *v.*Edward F. Allen

*Edward F. Allen,*pro se, in support of the petition.

Decided January 6, 1993

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 916 (AC 10857), is denied.
#### § 1229.106 Withdrawal of Indian lands from delegated authority.

If at any time an Indian tribe or an individual Indian allottee determines that it wishes to withdraw from the State delegation of authority in relation to its lands, it may do so by sending a petition of withdrawal to the State. Once the petition has been received, the State shall within 30 days cease all activities being carried out under the delegation of authority on the lands covered by the petition for the tribe or allottee.

[49 FR 37351, Sept. 21, 1984. Redesignated at 49 FR 40025, Oct. 12, 1984]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Walter Trinchet, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
 
 
 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Radale Imports, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the Report), I, Lee D. Dodson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:
 
 (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and
 
 (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  ****Date: August 16, 2004
By:
/s/ *Lee D. Dodson*Lee D. DodsonTitle Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
§ 965.655 Implementation. ( a ) *Amendments.* PHAs are required to implement the requirements of this subpart by amending each of the following: ( 1 ) All applicable PHA plans, according to the provisions in 24 CFR part 903.
( 2 ) Tenant leases, according to the provisions of 24 CFR 966.4.
( b ) *Deadline.* All PHAs must be in full compliance, with effective policy amendments, by July 30, 2018.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 3, 2009 

l0527 

Order 

 

June 3, 2009 

137950 

MARK SHAHEEN, 

Petitioner-Appellant, 

v SC: 137950 

 COA: 278751 

Ingham CC: 06-001004-AA 

MICHIGAN PUBLIC SCHOOL 

EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BOARD, 

 Respondent-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 2, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 KELLY, C.J., would grant leave to appeal.
(No. 87-CC-3576

#### Citizens for a Better Environment, Claimant, *v.*The State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June 22, 1987.*

Robert J. Jones, Jr., for Claimant.

Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General (Robert J. Sklamberg, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

Montana, C.J.

This cause coming before the Court on the parties’ joint stipulation and the Court being fully advised in the premises, the Court finds as follows:

On October 23,1986, Respondent, Illinois Pollution Control Board, adopted emergency rules to guide the implementation of section 39(h) of the Environmental Protection Act (“Act”) (Ill. Rev. Stat., ch. Ill1⁄2, par. 1039(h)), governing the land disposal of hazardous wastes, which was to take effect on January 1,1987. On October 31, 1986, Citizens For A Better Environment (CBE) filed a petition for review in the Illinois appellate court, first judicial district, alleging that the Board exceeded its statutory authority in adopting those emergency rules and seeking an order vacating the rules.

On January 26, 1987, following expedited briefing and oral argument, the appellate court issued a memorandum opinion and order holding that the Board *206had exceeded its authority and vacating the emergency rules. *(Citizens for a Better Environment v. Pollution Control Board*(1987), Ill. App. 3d_, 504 N.E.2d 166.) On April 9,1987, the appellate court issued an order under section 14.1 of the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act (Ill. Rev. Stat., ch. 127, par. 1014.1(b)) directing the Board “to pay to Citizens For a Better Environment its reasonable attorneys fees and costs incurred in this case in the amount of $25,000,” thereby approving a settlement agreement entered into by CBE and the Board.

The Board has made no payment to CBE and asserts it is unable to do so from its current budget. CBE filed this claim to obtain payment in accordance with the appellate court’s order. The parties to this action have stipulated that CBE is entitled to such payment and the entry of a $25,000 award by this Court. Like the Illinois Pollution Control Board, this Court has no ability to pay this obligation. Basically, it would have this Court seek the appropriation to pay the judgment rather than doing so itself. Because we agree that the money is owed, we will enter the award.

It is therefore ordered that Claimant, Citizens for a Better Environment, be and hereby is awarded $25,000 in satisfaction of the April 9,1987, order of the appellate court, first judicial district.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of IMPSAT Fiber Networks on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Ricardo A. Verdaguer, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the
registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date: August 13, 2004



/s/ Ricardo A. VerdaguerRicardo A. VerdaguerPresident and Chief Executive Officer




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
### §11906. General criminal penalty when specific penalty not provided

When another criminal penalty is not provided under this chapter, a rail carrier providing transportation subject to the jurisdiction of the Board under this part, and when that rail carrier is a corporation, a director or officer of the corporation, or a receiver, trustee, lessee, or person acting for or employed by the corporation that, alone or with another person, willfully violates this part or an order prescribed under this part, shall be fined not more than $5,000. The person may be imprisoned for not more than 2 years in addition to being fined under this section. A separate violation occurs each day a violation of this part continues.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §102(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 852; amended Pub. L. 105–102, §2(7), Nov. 20, 1997, 111 Stat. 2204.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### Pub. L. 105–102

This amends 49:11906 to correct an erroneous cross-reference.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 11914 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

A prior section 11906, Pub. L. 95–473, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1459, related to evasion of regulation of motor carriers and brokers, prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a). See section 14906 of this title.

#### Amendments

1997—Pub. L. 105–102 substituted "violation of this part" for "violation of this title".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
#### § 891.150 Operating cost standards.

HUD shall establish operating cost standards based on the average annual operating cost of comparable housing for the elderly or for persons with disabilities in each field office, and shall adjust the standard annually based on appropriate indices of increases in housing costs such as the Consumer Price Index. The operating cost standards shall be developed based on the number of units. However, under the Section 811 Program and for projects funded under §§ 891.655 through 891.790, the operating cost standard for group homes shall be based on the number of residents. HUD may adjust the operating cost standard applicable to an approved project to reflect such factors as differences in costs based on location within the field office jurisdiction. The operating cost standard will be used to determine the amount of the project assistance initially reserved for a project.
The Decline in Arrests of Juveniles 

Continued Through 2019

Estimates based on data from the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting Program highlight trends in juvenile arrests

The number of juvenile arrests for violent crime offenses were 

cut in half between 2006 and 2019

1983 1989 1995 2001 2007 2013 2019

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

160,000

Number of arrests, youth ages 0−17

Violent crime*

Juvenile arrests for Property Crime Index offenses fell 73% 

between 2008 and 2019 

0

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

700,000

800,000

Number of arrests, youth ages 0−17

Property Crime Index*

1983 1989 1995 2001 2007 2013 2019

After falling 67% since 2006, the number of juvenile arrests 

reached a new low in 2019 

0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

Number of arrests, youth ages 0−17

All offenses

1983 1989 1995 2001 2007 2013 2019

By 2019, arrest rates for violent crimes fell substantially from 

the 1994 peak for every age group younger than 45

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65

Age

1994

2019

Violent crime offenses

Arrests per 100,000 population in age group

1980

Youth under age 15 and females each accounted for about a 

third of juvenile arrests in 2019

Race

Gender

Age

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

32% 19% 22% 26%

69% 31%

63% 34% 3%

Under 15 15 16 17

Male Female

White Black Other*

Percent of youth (ages 0–17) arrests 

Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

* Other race includes American Indian/Alaskan Natives, Asian/Pacific 

 Islanders, and youth of unknown race.

ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb

* Violent crime offenses include murder, robbery, and aggravated assault. * Property Crime Index offenses include burglary, larceny-theft, motor

 vehicle theft, and arson.

Access more information on juvenile arrests in the 

“Law Enforcement & Juvenile Crime” section of the 

Statistical Briefing Book

n Review FAQs about juvenile arrests 

n Create custom annual and trend displays detailed by 

offense, age, and gender, or offense, race, and age in 

the “Customizable Arrest Tables” section

Notes: This publication was prepared by Charles Puzzanchera, 

National Center for Juvenile Justice, under cooperative agreement 

#2019-JX-FX-K001 awarded by the National Institute of Justice with 

funding support from OJJDP. November 2020.

Data source: Analysis of Federal Bureau of Investigation arrest data 

from the Bureau of Justice Statistics (data years 1980–2014) and the 

National Center for Juvenile Justice (data years 2015–2019).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001022657
<NAME> AETNA INDUSTRIES, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1997
<CASH>                                              35
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,067
<ALLOWANCES>                                       523
<INVENTORY>                                     14,508
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,023
<PP&E>                                          85,507
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,582
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 146,299
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,230
<BONDS>                                         85,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        (77)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   146,299
<SALES>                                         55,097
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,097
<CGS>                                           46,975
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,975
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,829
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,561
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,732
<INCOME-TAX>                                       669
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,063
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,063
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
the Balance Sheet at March 31, 1998 and Income Statement for the 
quarter ended March 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                 24,388
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                          52,765
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                            5,151
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       124,431
<PP&E>                                 2,607
<DEPRECIATION>                         217
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         210,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  123,831
<BONDS>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                               279,017
<OTHER-SE>                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           210,880
<SALES>                                13,854
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       13,854
<CGS>                                   4,846
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          86,412
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     562
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (77,404)
<INCOME-TAX>                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                          (77,404)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.01)

        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HUGO PASCUAL-CARINO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-70634

Agency No. A078-331-954

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 10, 2015** 

Before: FARRIS, WARDLAW, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Hugo Pascual-Carino, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal. 

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence

FILED

MAR 19 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th

Cir. 2006). We grant the petition for review and remand.

The agency found Pascual-Carino failed to establish a nexus to a protected

ground, but did not have the benefit of this court’s decisions in Henriquez-Rivas v.

Holder, 707 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir. 2013) (en banc), Cordoba v. Holder, 726 F.3d

1106 (9th Cir. 2013), and Pirir-Boc v. Holder, 750 F.3d 1077 (9th Cir. 2014), or

the BIA’s decisions in Matter of M-E-V-G-, 26 I. & N. Dec. 227 (BIA 2014), and

Matter of W-G-R-, 26 I. & N. Dec. 208 (BIA 2014). Further, in denying his claim,

the agency also did not have the benefit of this court’s intervening decision in Ren

v. Holder, 648 F.3d 1079 (9th Cir. 2011).

Thus, we remand Pascual-Carino’s withholding of removal claim to

determine the impact, if any, of these decisions. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12,

16-18 (2002) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

2 10-70634
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-122582) pertaining to the Nalco Holding Company 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and the Registration Statements (Form S-1 No. 333-126642,  Form S-1 No. 333-118583 and Form S-3 No. 333-130715) of Nalco Holding Company and in the related Prospectus of our reports dated February 27, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Nalco Holding Company, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Nalco Holding Company, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Chicago, Illinois

February 27, 2008





---
### §1546. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated annually by the Congress of the United States such sums as may be necessary and appropriate to carry out the provisions and purposes of this chapter.

(July 22, 1954, ch. 558, §35, 68 Stat. 510.)