alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 550.260 What Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) information must accompany the DPP or DOCD? The following CZMA information must accompany your DPP or DOCD: ( a ) *Consistency certification.* A copy of your consistency certification under section 307(c)(3)(B) of the CZMA (16 U.S.C. 1456(c)(3)(B)) and 15 CFR 930.76(c) stating that the proposed development and production activities described in detail in this DPP or DOCD comply with (name of State(s)) approved coastal management program(s) and will be conducted in a manner that is consistent with such program(s); and
( b ) *Other information.* “Information” as required by 15 CFR 930.76(a) and 15 CFR 930.58(a)(2)) and “Analysis” as required by 15 CFR 930.58(a)(3).
§ 285.903 What are the requirements for decommissioning FERC-licensed hydrokinetic facilities? You must comply with the decommissioning requirements in your BOEM-issued lease. If you fail to comply with the decommissioning requirements of your lease then: ( a ) BOEM may call for the forfeiture of your bond or other financial assurance;
( b ) You remain liable for removal or disposal costs and responsible for accidents or damages that might result from such failure; and
( c ) BSEE may take enforcement action under § 285.400.
§ 3288.30 Screening of dispute resolution request. ( a ) *Review for sufficiency.* When the request for dispute resolution has been received by the dispute resolution provider, a screening neutral will review the sufficiency of the information provided in the request for dispute resolution and determine if the dispute resolution process should proceed. If the screening neutral determines that a defect is properly alleged and timely reported, notice of the request will be forwarded, as provided in § 3288.33, to the manufacturer, retailer, and installer, as appropriate and to the extent the appropriate parties can be identified based on the information in the request.
( b ) *Insufficient information.* If a request for dispute resolution is lacking any information necessary to determine if the dispute resolution process should proceed, the screening neutral will contact the requester or the parties about supplementing the initial request. If information necessary to qualify the matter for the HUD Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program is not received within a reasonable time established by the screening neutral, the request for dispute resolution will be considered withdrawn.
( c ) *Denial of a dispute.* Denial by all of the parties that there is a dispute does not preclude the dispute resolution process from going forward to mediation. A screening neutral's determination that a defect is properly alleged is prima facie evidence of a dispute. If the defect has not been corrected or repaired, the matter will be referred to mediation.
( d ) *Determination of unreasonable risk.* If the screening neutral determines there is sufficient documentation of an alleged defect presenting an unreasonable risk of injury or death, he or she will send a copy of the request to HUD.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 04761**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** x 04761\04761_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04761\04761_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04761\04761_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04761\04761_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04761\04761_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

04761\04761_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement x 04761\Follow-up and resubmittals\1st review email response.pdf Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey. x 04761\Follow-up and resubmittals\original_04761_PartC.xls Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey. x 04761\Follow-up and resubmittals\Part C_Loveridge Road Power Plant.xls Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey. x 04761\Follow-up and resubmittals\Part D_Loveridge Road Power Plant.xls Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey. x 04761\Follow-up and resubmittals\Part H_Loveridge Road Power Plant.xls Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey. x 04761\Supplemental Documents\04761_Deadline Extension Approval.pdf Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey. x 04761\Supplemental Documents\04761_S2_Water Discharge Sketch_091509.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04761\04761_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04761\04761_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,060
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,102
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,264
<INVENTORY>                                      2,590
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,113
<PP&E>                                         234,241
<DEPRECIATION>                                  69,538
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 237,188
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,044
<BONDS>                                        129,941
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      88,267
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   237,188
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               118,859
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   64,303
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,085
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   778
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,282
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,236
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,236
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,236
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### §57104. Acquisition of vessels from sale of obsolete vessels

(a) In General.—The Secretary of Transportation may acquire suitable documented vessels with amounts in the Vessel Operations Revolving Fund derived from the sale of obsolete vessels in the National Defense Reserve Fleet.

(b) Valuation.—The acquired and obsolete vessels shall be valued at their scrap value in domestic or foreign markets as of the date of the acquisition for or sale from the Fleet. However, the value assigned to those vessels shall be determined on the same basis, with consideration given to the fair value of the cost of moving the vessel sold from the Fleet to the place of scrapping.

(c) Costs Incident to Lay-Up.—Costs incident to the lay-up of the vessel acquired under this section may be paid from amounts in the Fund.

(d) Transfers to Non-Citizens.—A vessel sold from the Fleet under this section may be scrapped in an approved foreign market without obtaining additional separate approval from the Secretary to transfer the vessel to a person not a citizen of the United States.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1660.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 57104 | 46 App.:1160(i). | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title V, §510(i), as added Pub. L. 86–575, July 5, 1960, 74 Stat. 312; Pub. L. 89–254, §1, Oct. 10, 1965, 79 Stat. 980; Pub. L. 91–469, §13, Oct. 21, 1970, 84 Stat. 1022; Pub. L. 93–605, §1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1965; Pub. L. 95–177, Nov. 15, 1977, 91 Stat. 1368; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(91), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 161; Pub. L. 101–595, title VII, §704, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2994. |

Section

In subsection (b), the words "vessel sold from the Fleet" are substituted for "traded-out vessel" for clarity and consistency.

In subsection (d), the words "without obtaining additional separate approval from the Secretary to transfer the vessel to a person not a citizen of the United States" are substituted for "Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 808 and 835 of this Appendix" for clarity and to avoid the cross references.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF 18 U.S.C.

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cardima, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gabriel B. Vegh, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to § 1350 of Chapter 63 of 18 U.S.C., as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,

the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|                                                                              
|/s/ Gabriel B. Vegh                                                           
|Gabriel B. Vegh Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer May 11, 2005
From: Angus Crane [acrane@naima.org]

Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 3:34 PM

To: Hancy, Cindy Wang

Cc: Fairchild.Susan@epamail.epa.gov; Reeves, David

Subject: NAIMA's Response for the Fiber Glass Industry to EPA's Formaldehyde and Collection 

Questions

Attachments: RR3182.pdf

Dear. Ms. Hancy:

Please find attached NAIMA’s response on behalf of the fiber glass industry to EPA’s questions related 

to formaldehyde and the collection chamber.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,

Angus E. Crane

Angus E. Crane

Executive Vice President, General Counsel

North American Insulation Manufacturers Association

Ph: (703) 684-0084 ext. 123

Fax: (703) 684-0427

Visit NAIMA online at:

www.NAIMA.org 

www.PipeInsulation.org
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3539

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and feasibility 

of designating certain lands along the northern coast of Maui, Hawaii, 

as a unit of the National Park System. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2005

Mr. CASE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Resources 

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability 

and feasibility of designating certain lands along the 

northern coast of Maui, Hawaii, as a unit of the National 

Park System.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NORTH MAUI COASTAL STUDY. 

4 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This section may be cited as the 

5 ‘‘North Maui Coastal Preservation Act of 2005’’. 

6 (b) STUDY.—

7 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Inte8 rior shall complete a study to determine the suit-
2

•HR 3539 IH 

1 ability and feasibility of designating certain lands lo2 cated on the northern coast of Maui, Hawaii, as a 

3 National Seashore, National Historical Park, Na4 tional Recreation Area, National Monument, Na5 tional Preserve, or other unit of the National Park 

6 System. 

7 (2) STUDY AREA.—The study area shall include 

8 the following parcels: 

9 (A) Property 1, approximately 43 acres 

10 (TMK II 3–8–01, parcel 72) stretching from 

11 Kelaakai Place in Sprecklesville to the western 

12 boundary of H.P. Baldwin Beach Park Road in 

13 Paia, and includes natural sand dunes, coastal 

14 beaches, and wetlands. 

15 (B) Property 2, approximately 17 acres 

16 known as H.P. Baldwin Park comprises TMK 

17 II 2–5–05, parcel 47 (4.6 acres) and parcel 46 

18 (12.5 acres). 

19 (C) Property 3, approximately 4.5 acres of 

20 coastal lands stretching from the eastern border 

21 of H.P. Baldwin Park to the Maui Youth and 

22 Cultural Center known as TMK II 2–6–01, par23 cel 1 (3.517 acres) and parcel 4 (1.08 acres). 

24 (D) Property 4, approximately 32 acres 

25 known as TMK II 2–5–05; parcel 17. 
3

•HR 3539 IH 

1 (E) Property 5, approximately 5.7 acres 

2 known as Lime Kiln Beach (TMK II 2–5–05, 

3 parcel 14). 

4 (F) Property 6, approximately 26 acres 

5 known as Stable Road Beach (TMK II 3–8–01, 

6 parcel 3). 

7 (3) APPLICABILITY OF OTHER LAW.—Para8 graphs (2) and (3) of section 8(c) of Public Law 91–

9 383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5(c)(2) and (3); commonly 

10 known as the National Park System General Au11 thorities Act) shall apply to the study. 

12 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 18 months after funds 

13 are made available for this section, the Secretary of the 

14 Interior shall transmit to the Committee on Resources of 

15 the House of Representatives and the Committee on En16 ergy and Natural Resources of the Senate a report con17 taining the conclusions of the study required by subsection 

18 (b).

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York v. Harold Davidson.

Motion for leave to prosecute appeal, as a poor person, denied. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Noonan, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 8, 2016

d0229

Order 

Clerk

March 8, 2016

151500

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 151500

COA: 322664

Ingham CC: 08-000288-FC

LOREN EUGENE SLOUGH, II,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 7, 2014 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
EXHIBIT 23.1
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  (1)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-155411) of Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc.,
 (2)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-164715) of Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc.,
 (3)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-169035) of Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc., and
 (4)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-118361) pertaining to the 1998 Stock Option Plan
and the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan of Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc.;
### **CHAPTER 6—CANAL ZONE**

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Canal Zone Code

Pub. L. 104–201, div. C, title XXXV, §3549, Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2870, repealed the Panama Canal Code.

Pub. L. 96–70, title III, §3303(b), Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 499, redesignated the Canal Zone Code as the Panama Canal Code. See References to Canal Zone Code Deemed References to Panama Canal Code note under section 3602 of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse.

Pub. L. 87–845, Oct. 18, 1962, 76A Stat. 1, revised and codified into the "Canal Zone Code" all the general and permanent laws relating to and in force in the Canal Zone as of Oct. 18, 1962, other than the general laws of the United States relating to or applying in the Canal Zone.

Act June 19, 1934, ch. 667, 48 Stat. 1122, enacted the "Canal Zone Code" to establish conclusively and be deemed to embrace all the permanent laws relating to or applying in the Canal Zone in force on date of enactment of the Code.
#### § 36.29 Brakes.

All mobile diesel-powered transportation equipment shall be equipped with adequate brakes acceptable to MSHA.
U.S. Department of Justice 

### Environment and Natual Resources Division
DJ # 90-5-2-4-18110/1 Environmental Defense Section P. O. Box 23986 L 'Enfant Plaza Station Washington, DC 20026-3986 Telephone (202) 305-0331 Facsimile (202) 514-8865
November 3, 2009 By email and first class mail 

### Travis E. Stils, Esq. Energy Minerals Law Center 1911 Main Avenue, Suite 238 Durango, CO 81301 Re: Settlement Agreement in Colorado Citizens Against Toxic Waste and Rocky Mountain Clean Air Action v. Lisa P. Jackson. in her official capacity as Administrator. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Civ. Action No. 08-cv-01787-REB-MEH (D. Colo.). Dear Travis:

Pursuant to Paragraph 12 of

### the Settlement Agreement ("Agreement") in this matter, I am writing to inform you that the EP A Administrator has consented to the Agreement and that the 

### Agreement is therefore final as ofthe date of this letter. Accordingly, the steps EP A agreed to 

### undertake as outlined in Paragraph 3 of the Agreement are now operative. In addition, as set forth in Paragraph 4 ofthe Agreement, the United States has agreed to pay Plaintiffs certain statutory costs and attorneys' fees in the amount of $27,427.50. Please provide me with the account and routing information referenced in Paragraph 4 so that the appropriate requ.est for payment can be made. 

### Paragraph 2 of the Agreement required Plaintiffs to fie a motion to administratively close the case under D.C.Colo.LCivR 41.2 within 10 business days of the date this Agreement became 

### final pursuant to Paragraph 12. However, in response to the paries joint motion made pursuant to Paragraph 1 that the case be stayed pending completion of 

### the process under section 113(g) of 

### the Clean Air Act, the cour on its own initiative issued an order to administratively close the . case. Thus, there is no need to make a separate motion to administratively close the case. 

### The final action in the case, a motion by Plaintiffs for voluntar dismissal of the Complaint with prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 (a), is required by Paragraph 2 of the 

### Agreement. That motion is to be fied within 10 business days after publication in the Federal Register of EP A's promulgation of either: (1) EP A's issuance of a final determination not to revise Subpar W; or (2) EPA's promulgation ofa final revision of Subpar W. 

### I am glad that we were able to resolve this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns. Sincerely,



# ~~~al~~
Environmental Defense Sectioncc: Susan Stahe, EP A Office of General Counsel

- 2 -
§ 44.32 Initial decision. ( a ) Within 60 days after the time allowed for the filing of proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, the administrative law judge shall make and serve upon each party a decision, which shall become final upon the 30th day after service thereof, unless an appeal is filed as provided in § 44.33 of this part. After consultation with the parties, the administrative law judge may expedite or extend the time for issuing the decision. The decision of the administrative law judge shall include: ( 1 ) A statement of findings of fact and conclusions of law, with reasons therefor, upon each material issue of fact, law, or discretion presented on the record; and
( 2 ) The appropriate rule, order, relief, or denial thereof.
( b ) The decision of the administrative law judge shall be based upon a consideration of the whole record and shall state all facts officially noticed and relied upon. It shall be made on the basis of a preponderance of reliable and probative evidence.
[43 FR 29518, July 7, 1978, as amended at 55 FR 53442, Dec. 28, 1990]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSmall Business Innovation Research GRC Phase I, Phase II, and Post-Phase II Opportunity Assessment for 2015This report outlines the 2015 Small Business Innovation Research/Small Business Technology Transfer (SBIR/STTR) Phase I, Phase II, and Post-Phase II opportunity contract award results associated with NASA's Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate (ARMD), Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate (HEOMD), Science Mission Directorate (SMD), and Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD) for NASA Glenn Research Center. The report also highlights the number of Phase I, Phase II, and Post-Phase II contracts awarded by mission directorate. The 2015 Phase I contract awards to companies in Ohio and their corresponding technologies are also discussed.Document ID20160012684Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsNguyen, Hung D.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Steele, Gynelle C.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredOctober 27, 2016Publication DateOctober 1, 2016Subject CategoryAdministration And ManagementReport/Patent NumberGRC-E-DAA-TN30719E-19223NASA/TM-2016-219160Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 471296.01.03.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.KeywordsAeronautics Research ARMDand Space TechnologyPhase 3 evaluationScience Mission SMDHuman Exploration and Operations HEOMDAvailable DownloadsNameType20160012684.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certifications


     The undersigned officers certify that this report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and that the information contained in the report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Centale, Inc.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Centale, Inc. and will be retained by Centale, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

July 13, 2006                       /s/ Jon DeYoung
                                    ------------------------------------
                                    Jon DeYoung (Chief executive officer)

July 13, 2006                       /s/ Juan C. Ferreira
                                    -----------------------------------------
                                    Juan C. Ferreira (Chief financial officer)
#### In the Matter of Irving A. Harris, Appellant, v. Margers J. Laivins et al., Respondents.

Motion to dispense with printing granted by default. The appeal will be heard on the original papers (including the typed minutes) and on typewritten briefs. The parties are directed to file six copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
#### § 56.6305 Unused explosive material.

Unused explosive material shall be moved to a protected location as soon as practical after loading operations are completed.