## 37488 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 112 / Friday, June 10, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

(i) Fokker Service Bulletin SBF28–28–053, Revision 3, dated January 9, 2014.

(ii) Reserved. (4) The following service information was approved for IBR on September 16, 2011 (76 FR 50111, August 12, 2011).

(i) Fokker Service Bulletin SBF28–28–053, Revision 1, dated September 20, 2010.

(ii) Reserved. (5) For service information identified in this AD, contact Fokker Services B.V., Technical Services Dept., P.O. Box 1357, 2130 EL Hoofddorp, the Netherlands; telephone +31 (0)88–6280–350; fax +31 (0)88–6280–111; email technicalservices@ fokker.com; Internet http:// www.myfokkerfleet.com.

(6) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.

(7) You may view this service information that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 31,

2016. Michael Kaszycki, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 2016–13545 Filed 6–9–16; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**



### DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 39**

**[Docket No. FAA–2015–4813; Directorate Identifier 2013–NM–161–AD; Amendment**  **39–18532; AD 2016–11–05]**

**RIN 2120–AA64**



### Airworthiness Directives; Airbus **Airplanes**

**AGENCY** 

### : Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT).

**ACTION** 

### : Final rule.

**SUMMARY** 

### : We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 99–16–01 for certain Airbus Model A300 B4–600, B4–600R, and F4–600R series airplanes,
and Model A300 C4–605R Variant F airplanes (collectively called Model A300–600 series airplanes). AD 99–16– 01 required repetitive inspections of certain bolt holes where parts of the main landing gear (MLG) are attached to the wing rear spar, and repair if necessary. Since we issued AD 99–16– 01, we have determined that the risk of cracking in the wing rear spar is higher than initially determined. This new AD adds airplanes to the applicability, reduces the compliance times and repetitive intervals for the inspections, and changes the inspection procedures. This AD was prompted by a determination that the risk of cracking in the wing rear spar is higher than initially determined. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracking of the rear spar of the wing, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane.

**DATES** 

### : This AD becomes effective July

15, 2016.

The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of July 15, 2016.

The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain other publication listed in this AD as of November 9, 1995 (60 FR 52618, October 10, 1995).

**ADDRESSES** 

### : For service information identified in this final rule, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office— EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@ airbus.com; Internet http://
www.airbus.com . You may view this
referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221. It is also available on the Internet

at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.

FAA–2015–4813.

Examining the AD Docket

You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2015– 4813; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the Docket Office (telephone 800–647–5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,

DC 20590.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT** 

### : Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; telephone: 425–227–2125;
fax: 425–227–1149.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION** 

### :

Discussion

We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 to supersede AD 99–16–01, Amendment 39–11236 (64 FR 40743, July 28, 1999) (‘‘AD 99–16–01’’). AD 99– 16–01 superseded AD 95–20–02, Amendment 39–9380 (60 FR 52618, October 10, 1995). AD 99–16–01 applied to certain Airbus Model A300 B4–600, B4–600R, and F4–600R series airplanes,
and Model A300 C4–605R Variant F airplanes (collectively called Model A300–600 series airplanes). The NPRM published in the Federal Register on November 17, 2015 (80 FR 71751) (‘‘the NPRM’’).

The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA Airworthiness Directive 2013–0180, dated August 9, 2013 (referred to after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct
an unsafe condition for certain Airbus Model A300 B4–600, B4–600R, and F4– 600R series airplanes, and Model A300 C4–605R Variant F airplanes (collectively called Model A300–600 series airplanes). The MCAI states:

During full-scale fatigue testing, cracks were found on the rear spar from certain bolt holes at the attachment of the Main Landing gear (MLG) forward pick-up fitting and the
MLG Rib 5 aft.

This condition, if not detected and corrected, could reduce the structural integrity of the aeroplane.

DGAC [Direction Ge  ́ ne

 ́ rale de l’Aviation Civile] France issued * * * [an AD] (later revised) to require High Frequency Eddy Current (HFEC) or Ultrasonic (U/S) inspections of certain fastener holes where the MLG forward pick-up fitting and MLG Rib 5 aft are attached to the rear spar.

Since DGAC France * * * [issued a revised AD, which corresponded to FAA AD 99–16–01, Amendment 39–11236 (64 FR 40743, July 28, 1999), which superseded FAA AD 95–20–02, Amendment 39–9380 (60 FR 52618, October 10, 1995)] * * *, a fleet survey and updated Fatigue and Damage Tolerance analyses have been performed in
order to substantiate the second A300–600 Extended Service Goal (ESG2) exercise. The results of these analyses have shown that the
threshold and interval must be reduced to allow timely detection of these cracks and accomplishment of an applicable corrective

action.

For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD retains the requirements of [the revised DGAC France AD], which is superseded, but reduces the related compliance times.



### The new, reduced threshold for the initial inspection ranges between 8,900


## 37489 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 112 / Friday, June 10, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

total flight cycles/20,000 total flight hours, and 34,600 total flight cycles/ 77,800 total flight hours, depending on the modification. The grace periods (750 or 1,500 landings) for airplanes that have exceeded the specified thresholds are unchanged from those provided in AD 99–16–01. The new, reduced intervals for the repetitive inspections range between 4,000 flight cycles/9,000 flight hours (whichever occurs first), and 8,900 flight cycles/20,000 flight hours (whichever occurs first), depending on the modification. You may examine the MCAI in the AD
docket on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–

4813.

Comments

We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. We
received no comments on the NPRM or
on the determination of the cost to the public.

Conclusion

We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting this AD as proposed except for minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:

• Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and

• Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed in the NPRM.

Related Service Information Under 1

CFR Part 51

We reviewed Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6017, Revision 04, including Appendix 1, dated February 4, 2011.
This service information describes procedures for repetitive inspections of certain bolt holes where parts of the MLG are attached to the wing rear spar, and repair. This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the

**ADDRESSES** 

### section.

Costs of Compliance

We estimate that this AD affects 71 airplanes of U.S. registry.

The actions required by AD 99–16–01 and retained in this AD, take about 226 work-hours per product, at an average labor rate of $85 per work hour. Required parts cost about $0 per product. Based on these figures, the
estimated cost of the actions that are required by AD 99–16–01 is $19,210 per product, per inspection cycle. We also estimate that it will take about 226 work-hours per product to comply with the new basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD on U.S. operators to be $1,363,910, or $19,210 per product.

We have received no definitive data that will enable us to provide cost
estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA’s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more detail the scope of the Agency’s authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.’’ Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking

action.

Regulatory Findings

We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866;

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);

3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and

4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:

**PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS**
**DIRECTIVES**

■ 

### 1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

**§ 39.13 [Amended]**

■ 

### 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 99–16–01, Amendment 39–11236 (64 FR 40743, July 28, 1999), and adding the following new AD:

2016–11–05 Airbus: Amendment 39–18532; Docket No. FAA–2015–4813; Directorate
Identifier 2013–NM–161–AD.

(a) Effective Date

This AD becomes effective July 15, 2016.

(b) Affected ADs

This AD replaces AD 99–16–01, Amendment 39–11236 (64 FR 40743, July 28, 1999) (‘‘AD 99–16–01’’).

(c) Applicability

This AD applies to Airbus Model A300 B4– 601, B4–603, B4–620, and B4–622 airplanes;
Model A300 B4–605R and B4–622R airplanes; Model A300 F4–605R airplanes;
and Model A300 C4–605R Variant F airplanes; certificated in any category; all
manufacturer serial numbers.

(d) Subject

Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57, Wings.

(e) Reason

This AD was prompted by the results of a full-scale fatigue test when cracking was found on the rear spar of the wing, and the subsequent determination that the risk of such cracking is higher than initially determined. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracking of the rear spar of the wing, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already
done.

(g) Retained Inspections and Corrective Actions, With Revised Service Information

This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f) of AD
99–16–01 with revised service information and reduced thresholds and repetitive intervals, for Airbus Model A300 B4–600, B4–600R, and F4–600R series airplanes, and Model A300 C4–605R Variant F airplanes; manufacturer serial numbers (MSNs) 252 through 553 inclusive; except those airplanes
on which Airbus Modification 07601 has been accomplished prior to delivery.

(1) Perform a high frequency eddy current (HFEC) rototest inspection to detect cracks in


## 37490 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 112 / Friday, June 10, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

certain bolt holes where the main landing gear (MLG) forward pick-up fitting and MLG rib 5 aft are attached to the rear spar, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300– 57–6017, Revision 01, including Appendix 1, dated July 25, 1994; or Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6017, Revision 04, including Appendix 1, dated February 24, 2011. As of the effective date of this AD, only Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6017, Revision 04, including Appendix 1, dated February 24, 2011, may be used for the actions required by this paragraph.

(i) For airplanes that have accumulated 17,300 total landings or less as of November 9, 1995 (the effective date of AD 95–20–02, Amendment 39–9380 (60 FR 52618, October 10, 1995)) (‘‘AD 95–20–02’’): Inspect prior to the accumulation of 17,300 total landings, or within 1,500 landings after November 9, 1995, whichever occurs later.

(ii) For airplanes that have accumulated 17,301 or more total landings, but less than 19,300 total landings as of November 9, 1995 (the effective date of AD 95–20–02): Inspect within 1,500 landings after November 9,

1995.

(iii) For airplanes that have accumulated 19,300 or more total landings as of November 9, 1995 (the effective date of AD 95–20–02): Inspect within 750 landings after November 9, 1995 (the effective date of AD 95–20–02).

(2) If no crack is found during the inspection required by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, repeat that inspection thereafter at the time specified in either paragraph (g)(2)(i) or (g)(2)(ii) of this AD, as applicable.

(i) For airplanes on which Airbus Modification 07716 (as specified in Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6020) has not been accomplished: Inspect at the time specified in paragraph (g)(2)(i)(A) or (g)(2)(i)(B) of this AD, as applicable.

(A) For airplanes having MSNs 465 through 553 inclusive: Repeat the inspection at intervals not to exceed 13,000 landings, until the inspection required by paragraph (g)(4)(ii)(A)( 1 ) of this AD has been accomplished.

(B) For airplanes having MSNs 252 through 464 inclusive: Repeat the inspection at intervals not to exceed 8,400 landings, until the inspection required by paragraph (g)(4)(ii)(A)( 2) of this AD has been accomplished.

(ii) For airplanes on which Airbus Modification 07716 has been accomplished: Inspect at the time specified in either paragraph (g)(2)(ii)(A) or (g)(2)(ii)(B) of this AD, as applicable.

(A) For airplanes having MSNs 465 through 553 inclusive: Repeat the inspection at intervals not to exceed 11,800 landings, until the inspection required by paragraph (g)(4)(i)(B) of this AD has been accomplished.

(B) For airplanes having MSNs 252 through 464 inclusive: Repeat the inspection within 10,700 landings following the initial inspection required by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 7,500 landings, until the inspection required by paragraph (g)(4)(ii)(B)( 2) has been accomplished.

(3) If any crack is found during the inspection required by either paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, prior to further flight, accomplish the requirements of either paragraph (g)(3)(i) or (g)(3)(ii) of this AD, as applicable.

(i) For airplanes on which Airbus
Modification 07716 has not been accomplished: Oversize the bolt hole by 1/32 inch and repeat the HFEC inspection required by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300– 57–6017, Revision 01, including Appendix 1, dated July 25, 1994. After accomplishing the oversizing and HFEC inspection, repeat the inspection, as required by paragraph (g)(2) of this AD, at the applicable schedule specified in that paragraph, until the inspection required by paragraph (g)(4)(ii)(B)( 1 ) or (g)(4)(ii)(B)( 2) of this AD has been accomplished.

(A) If no cracking is detected, install the
second oversize bolt in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6017, Revision 01, including Appendix 1, dated July 25, 1994.

(B) If any cracking is detected, repair in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM–116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate.

(ii) For airplanes on which Airbus Modification 07716 has been accomplished: Repair in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM–116. After repair, repeat the inspections as required by paragraph (g)(2) of this AD at the applicable schedule specified in that paragraph, until the inspection required by paragraph (g)(4)(ii)(B)( 1 ) or (g)(4)(ii)(B)( 2) of this AD has been accomplished.

(4) Perform an ultrasonic inspection to
detect cracks in certain bolt holes where the MLG forward pick-up fitting and MLG rib 5 aft are attached to the rear spar, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300– 57–6017, Revision 03, dated November 19, 1997; or Revision 04, including Appendix 1, dated February 24, 2011; at the time specified in paragraph (g)(4)(i) or (g)(4)(ii) of this AD, as applicable. As of the effective date of this AD, only Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57– 6017, Revision 04, including Appendix 1, dated February 24, 2011, may be used for the actions in this paragraph.

(i) For airplanes not inspected prior to September 1, 1999 (the effective date of AD 99–16–01), as specified in Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6017, dated November 22, 1993; or Revision 01, including Appendix 1, dated July 25, 1994: Inspect at the time specified in paragraph (g)(4)(i)(A), (g)(4)(i)(B), or (g)(4)(i)(C) of this AD, as applicable. Accomplishment of this inspection terminates the requirements of paragraph (g)(1) of this AD.

(A) For airplanes that have accumulated 17,300 total landings or fewer as of the effective date of this AD: Inspect prior to the accumulation of 17,300 total landings, or within 1,500 landings after September 1, 1999 (the effective date of AD 99–16–01),
whichever occurs later.

(B) For airplanes that have accumulated 17,301 total landings or more but fewer than 19,300 total landings as of September 1, 1999 (the effective date of AD 99–16–01): Inspect within 1,500 landings after September 1, 1999 (the effective date of AD 99–16–01).

(C) For airplanes that have accumulated 19,300 total landings or more as of September 1, 1999 (the effective date of AD 99–16–01): Inspect within 750 landings after September 1, 1999 (the effective date of AD 99–16–01).

(ii) For airplanes on which an HFEC inspection was performed prior to September 1, 1999 (the effective date of AD 99–16–01), in accordance with the requirements of paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, or in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6017, dated November 22, 1993: Inspect at the time specified in paragraph (g)(4)(ii)(A) or (g)(4)(ii)(B) of this AD, as applicable.

(A) If no cracking was detected during any HFEC inspection accomplished prior to September 1, 1999 (the effective date of AD 99–16–01), and if Airbus Modification 07716 has not been accomplished: Inspect at the time specified in paragraph (g)(4)(ii)(A)( 1 ) or (g)(4)(ii)(A)( 2) of this AD, as applicable.

( 1 ) For airplanes having MSNs 465 through 553 inclusive: Inspect within 13,000 landings after the most recent HFEC inspection, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 8,900 landings. Accomplishment of this inspection constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspection requirement of paragraph (g)(2)(i)(A) of this AD.

( 2) For airplanes having MSNs 252 through 464 inclusive: Inspect within 8,400 landings after the most recent HFEC inspection, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 5,500 landings. Accomplishment of this inspection constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspection requirement of paragraph (g)(2)(i)(B) of this AD.

(B) If any cracking was detected during any HFEC inspection performed prior to the effective date of this AD, regardless of the method of repair, or if Airbus Modification 07716 has been accomplished: Inspect at the time specified in paragraph (g)(4)(ii)(B)( 1 ) or (g)(4)(ii)(B)( 2) of this AD, as applicable.

( 1 ) For airplanes having MSNs 465 through 553 inclusive: Inspect within 11,800 landings after the most recent HFEC inspection, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 8,200 landings. Accomplishment of this inspection constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspection requirement of paragraph (g)(3)(i) or (g)(3)(ii) of this AD, as applicable.

( 2) For airplanes having MSNs 252 through 464 inclusive: Inspect within 10,700 landings after the initial inspection in accordance with paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, or within 7,500 landings after the most recent HFEC inspection, whichever occurs later, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 4,900 landings. Accomplishment of this inspection constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspection requirement of paragraph (g)(3)(i) or (g)(3)(ii) of this AD, as applicable.

(5) If no cracking is detected during the ultrasonic inspection required by paragraph (g)(4)(i) of this AD, repeat that inspection thereafter at the time specified in paragraph (g)(5)(i) or (g)(5)(ii) of this AD, as applicable, until the initial ultrasonic inspection required by paragraph (h) of this AD is done.


## 37491 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 112 / Friday, June 10, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

(i) For airplanes having MSNs 465 through 553 inclusive: Repeat the inspection at intervals not to exceed 8,900 landings.

(ii) For airplanes having MSNs 232 through 464 inclusive: Repeat the inspection at intervals not to exceed 5,500 landings.

(6) If any cracking is detected during any inspection performed in accordance with the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) or (g)(5) of this AD: Prior to further flight, repair in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM–116; or
the Direction Ge  ́ ne

 ́ rale de l’Aviation Civile (or its delegated agent); or the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus’s EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA).

Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD: Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6017, Revision 01, including Appendix 1, dated July 25, 1994; and Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6017, Revision 04, including Appendix 1, dated February 24, 2011; also reference Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6020, dated November 22, 1993, as an additional source
of service information for installation of
oversize studs in the bolt holes.

(h) New Repetitive Inspections

At the applicable times specified in paragraph 1.B.(5), ‘‘Accomplishment Timescale,’’ of Airbus Service Bulletin A300– 57–6017, Revision 04, including Appendix 1, dated February 24, 2011: Do ultrasonic inspections to detect cracks in the MLG attachment fitting holes on the wing rear spar, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6017, Revision 04, including Appendix 1, dated February 24, 2011. Repeat the inspections thereafter at the applicable intervals specified in paragraph 1.B.(5), ‘‘Accomplishment Timescale,’’ of Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6017, Revision 04, including Appendix 1, dated February 24, 2011. For airplanes modified as specified in Airbus Service Bulletin A300– 57–6073, the initial inspection threshold is counted from the completion date of the modification. Clarification of compliance time terminology used in table 1, ‘‘Structural Inspection Program,’’ of Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6017, Revision 04, including Appendix 1, dated February 24, 2011, is provided in paragraphs (h)(1) through (h)(4) of this AD. Accomplishment of the initial inspection terminates the repetitive inspections required by paragraph (g)(5) of this AD.

(1) For pre-Airbus Modification 07716 or pre-Airbus Modification 11440 airplanes:

(i) The term ‘‘flight cycles’’ in the ‘‘Inspection Threshold’’ column is total flight cycles accumulated by the airplane.

(ii) The term ‘‘flight hours’’ in the ‘‘Inspection Threshold’’ column is total flight hours accumulated by the airplane.

(2) For post-Airbus Modification 07716 airplanes:

(i) The term ‘‘flight cycles’’ in the ‘‘Inspection Threshold’’ column is total flight cycles accumulated by the airplane.

(ii) The term ‘‘flight hours’’ in the ‘‘Inspection Threshold’’ column is total flight hours accumulated by the airplane.

(3) For post-Airbus Modification 11440 (Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6073) airplanes: (i) The term ‘‘flight cycles’’ in the ‘‘Inspection Threshold’’ column is flight cycles accumulated by the airplane after the
modification was done.

(ii) The term ‘‘flight hours’’ in the ‘‘Inspection Threshold’’ column is flight hours accumulated by the airplane after the
modification was done.

(4) For post-Airbus Modification 07601 airplanes:

(i) The term ‘‘flight cycles’’ in the ‘‘Inspection Threshold’’ column is total flight cycles accumulated by the airplane.

(ii) The term ‘‘flight hours’’ in the ‘‘Inspection Threshold’’ column is total flight hours accumulated by the airplane.

(i) Repairs

If any crack is found during any inspection required by paragraph (h) of this AD: Before further flight, repair using a method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the EASA; or Airbus’s

EASA DOA.

(j) Non-Terminating Repair

Accomplishment of any repair as required by paragraph (i) of this AD is not terminating action for the repetitive inspections required by paragraph (g) or (h) of this AD.

(k) Credit for Previous Actions

This paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective date of this AD using any of the following service information.

(1) Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6017, dated November 22, 1993, which is not incorporated by reference in this AD.

(2) Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6017, Revision 01, including Appendix 1, dated July 25, 1994, which was incorporated by
reference in AD 95–20–02 and is retained in
this AD.

(3) Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6017, Revision 02, dated January 14, 1997, including Appendix 1, dated July 25, 1994, which is not incorporated by reference in this

AD.

(4) Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6017, Revision 03, including Appendix 1, dated November 19, 1997, which was incorporated by reference in AD 99–16–01, but is not
retained in this AD.

(l) Other FAA AD Provisions

The following provisions also apply to this

AD:

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, International Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; telephone: 425–227–2125; fax: 425–227– 1149. Information may be emailed to: 9- ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.

(i) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/ certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.

(ii) AMOCs approved previously for AD 99–16–01 are approved as AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of this AD.

(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the effective date of this AD, for any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM– 116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus’s EASA DOA. If approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.

(m) Related Information

(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2013–0180, dated August 9, 2013, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–

2015–4813.

(2) Service information identified in this AD that is not incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in paragraphs (n)(5) and (n)(6) of this AD.

(n) Material Incorporated by Reference

(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.

(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.

(3) The following service information was approved for IBR on July 15, 2016.

(i) Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6017, Revision 04, including Appendix 1, dated February 24, 2011.

(ii) Reserved. (4) The following service information was approved for IBR on November 9, 1995 (60 FR 52618, October 10, 1995).

(i) Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6017, Revision 01, including Appendix 1, dated July 25, 1994.

(ii) Reserved. (5) For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office—EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@
airbus.com ; Internet http://www.airbus.com.

(6) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.

(7) You may view this service information that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call


## 37492 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 112 / Friday, June 10, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

202–741–6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 18,

2016.
Dionne Palermo, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 2016–12324 Filed 6–9–16; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**



### DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 39**

**[Docket No. FAA–2015–2134; Directorate Identifier 2015–CE–012–AD; Amendment**  **39–18547; AD 2016–11–20]**

**RIN 2120–AA64**



### Airworthiness Directives; B/E **Aerospace Protective Breathing Equipment Part Number 119003–11** 

**AGENCY** 

### : Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION** 

### : Final rule.

**SUMMARY** 

### : We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain B/E Aerospace protective breathing equipment (PBE) that is installed on airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report of a PBE catching fire upon activation by a crewmember. This AD requires replacing the PBE. We are issuing this AD to correct the unsafe condition on these products.

**DATES** 

### : This AD is effective July 15,

2016.

The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of July 15, 2016.

**ADDRESSES** 

### : For service information identified in this final rule, contact B/ E Aerospace, Inc., Commercial Aircraft Products Group, 10800 Pflumm Road, Lenexa, Kansas 66215; phone: (913) 338–9800; fax: (913) 338–8419; Internet: www.beaerospace.com. You may view
this referenced service information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri
64106. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (816) 329–4148. It is also available
on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–

2134.

Examining the AD Docket

You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2015– 2134; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is Document Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,

DC 20590.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT** 

### : David Enns, Aerospace Engineer, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, 1801 S. Airport Road, Room 100, Wichita, Kansas 67209; phone: (316) 946–4147; fax: (316) 946–4107; email: david.enns@faa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION** 

### :

Discussion

We issued a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain B/E Aerospace protective breathing equipment (PBE) that is installed on airplanes. The SNPRM published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2016 (81 FR 2131). We preceded the SNPRM with a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that published in the Federal Register on June 16, 2015 (80 FR 34330). The NPRM proposed to require inspecting the PBE to determine if the pouch has the proper vacuum seal and replacing if necessary. The NPRM was prompted by a report of a PBE catching fire upon activation by a crewmember. The SNPRM proposed to require replacement of the PBE following newly issued service information, regardless of inspection results. We are issuing this
AD to correct the unsafe condition on these products.

Comments

We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. We
have considered the comments received. We received one anonymous comment in support of the SNPRM (81 FR 2131, January 15, 2016).

Request To Change Compliance Time

Penney Baudin of United Airlines requested a change to the PBE replacement compliance time.

The commenter requested a 12-month repetitive inspection with a 36-month terminating replacement action. The commenter stated that the change would alleviate restrictive shipping means and complex distribution of the PBEs since the units contain oxygen generators. We do not agree with the commenter. We believe that the replacement compliance time of 18 months after the
effective date of this AD is sufficient time since we are allowing even more time than specified in the related service information. Also, the public has been aware of this safety issue since we first published the first NPRM on June 16, 2015 (80 FR 34330). We have not changed the final rule AD action based
on this comment.

Request To Correct Service Information

John Barker of B/E Aerospace stated that Service Bulletin 119003–35–009, dated November 9, 2015, is incorrectly
referenced as Rev. 009 instead of Rev. 000 in the preamble of the SNPRM (81 FR 2131, January 15, 2016). The commenter requested the reference to
the revision number be corrected.

We agree with the commenter. However, on April 12, 2016, Rev. 001 of B/E Aerospace Service Bulletin 119003–
35–009 was released. We are incorporating the Revision 001, dated April 12, 2016, into the final rule AD action because the procedures for doing the inspection and replacement of the PBE have not changed.

We have changed the final rule AD action to include the newly revised service bulletin and to give credit to owners/operators who may have already done the required replacement following B/E Aerospace Service Bulletin No. 119003–35–009, Rev. 000, dated November 9, 2015, which was correctly referenced in paragraph (h) of the regulatory text in the SNPRM (81 FR 2131, January 15, 2016).

Conclusion

We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting this AD as proposed except for minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:

• Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the SNPRM (81 FR 2131, January 15, 2016) for correcting the unsafe condition; and

• Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed in the SNPRM (81 FR 2131, January 15, 2016).

Related Service Information Under 1

CFR Part 51

We reviewed B/E Aerospace Service Bulletin No. 119003–35–011, Rev. 000, dated February 4, 2015, and B/E Aerospace Service Bulletin 119003–35– 009, Rev. 001, dated April 12, 2016. B/ E Aerospace Service Bulletin No. 119003–35–011, Rev. 000, dated