alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 550.212 What information must accompany the EP? The following information must accompany your EP: ( a ) General information required by § 550.213;
( b ) Geological and geophysical (G&G) information required by § 550.214;
( c ) Hydrogen sulfide information required by § 550.215;
( d ) Biological, physical, and socioeconomic information required by § 550.216;
( e ) Solid and liquid wastes and discharges information and cooling water intake information required by § 550.217;
( f ) Air emissions information required by § 550.218;
( g ) Oil and hazardous substance spills information required by § 550.219;
( h ) Alaska planning information required by § 550.220;
( i ) Environmental monitoring information required by § 550.221;
( j ) Lease stipulations information required by § 550.222;
( k ) Mitigation measures information required by § 550.223;
( l ) Support vessels and aircraft information required by § 550.224;
( m ) Onshore support facilities information required by § 550.225;
( n ) Coastal zone management information required by § 550.226;
( o ) Environmental impact analysis information required by § 550.227; and
( p ) Administrative information required by § 550.228.
§ 550.183 When may BOEM or the Secretary extend or cancel a lease at the development and production stage? ( a ) BOEM may extend your lease if you submit a DPP and the Regional Supervisor disapproves the plan according to the regulations in 30 CFR part 550, subpart B. Following the disapproval: ( 1 ) BOEM will allow you to hold the lease for 5 years, or less time at your request;
( 2 ) Any time within 5 years after the disapproval, you may reapply for approval of the same or a modified plan; and
( 3 ) The Regional Supervisor will approve, disapprove, or require modification of the plan under 30 CFR part 550, subpart B.
( b ) If the Regional Supervisor has not approved a DPP or required you to submit a DPP for approval or modification, the Secretary will cancel the lease: ( 1 ) When the 5-year period in paragraph (a)(1) of this section expires; or
( 2 ) If you request cancellation at an earlier time.
#### § 15.21 Tolerances for ingredients.

Tolerances for each ingredient in an explosive, which are expressed as a percentage of the total explosive, shall not exceed the following:

(a) Physical sensitizers: The tolerances established by the applicant;

(b) Aluminum: ±0.7 percent;

(c) Carbonaceous materials: ±3 percent; and

(d) Moisture and ingredients other than specified in paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section: The tolerances specified in Table II.

| Quantity of ingredients (as percent of total explosive or sheath) | Tolerance percent |
| --- | --- |
| 0 to 5.0 | 1.2 |
| 5.1 to 10.0 | 1.5 |
| 10.1 to 20.0 | 1.7 |
| 20.1 to 30.0 | 2.0 |
| 30.1 to 40.0 | 2.3 |
| 40.1 to 50.0 | 2.5 |
| 50.1 to 55.0 | 2.8 |
| 55.1 to 100.0 | 3.0 |

Table II—Tolerances for Moisture and Other Ingredients
#### § 56.10001 Filling buckets.

Buckets shall not be overloaded, and feed shall be regulated to prevent spillage.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOverview of NASA Lewis Research Center free-piston Stirling engine activitiesA generic free-piston Stirling technology project is being conducted to develop technologies generic to both space power and terrestrial heat pump applications in a cooperative, cost-shared effort. The generic technology effort includes extensive parametric testing of a 1 kW free-piston Stirling engine (RE-1000), development of a free-piston Stirling performance computer code, design and fabrication under contract of a hydraulic output modification for RE-1000 engine tests, and a 1000-hour endurance test, under contract, of a 3 kWe free-piston Stirling/alternator engine. A newly initiated space power technology feasibility demonstration effort addresses the capability of scaling a free-piston Stirling/alternator system to about 25 kWe; developing thermodynamic cycle efficiency  or equal to 70 percent of Carnot at temperature ratios in the order of 1.5 to 2.0; achieving a power conversion unit specific weight of 6 kg/kWe; operating with noncontacting gas bearings; and dynamically balancing the system. Planned engine and component design and test efforts are described.Document ID19840014444Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsSlaby, J. G.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1984Subject CategoryUrban Technology And TransportationReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-83649DOE/NASA/1005-2E-2094NAS 1.15:83649Meeting InformationMeeting: Intersociety Energy Conversion Eng. Conf.Start Date: August 19, 1984End Date: August 24, 1984Sponsors:SAE,AIChE,IEEE,ASME,AIAA,ANS,ACSAccession Number84N22512Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-55-62CONTRACT_GRANT: DE-AI05-82OR-1005Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840014444.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Stuart G. Ballin v. Margaret S. Ballin.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted unless the appellant perfects the appeal for argument or submission for the January 1961 Term of this court. Concur — -Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente and Bergan, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9439 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9439

 To authorize proceeds from any sale or any moneys forfeited under the 
Controlled Substances Act to be used for the Substance Use Prevention, 
 Treatment, and Recovery Services Block Grant, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 30, 2024

Mr. Molinaro (for himself and Ms. Titus) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition 
      to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize proceeds from any sale or any moneys forfeited under the 
Controlled Substances Act to be used for the Substance Use Prevention, 
 Treatment, and Recovery Services Block Grant, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fentanyl Seizure and Health Recovery 
Act''.

SEC. 2. USE OF MONEYS FORFEITED UNDER THE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT.

    Section 511(e)(2)(A) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 
881(e)(2)(A)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i), by striking ``and'';
            (2) in clause (ii), by striking the period and inserting 
        ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(iii) the expenses incurred under subpart II of 
                part B of title XIX of the Public Health Service Act in 
                the case that such sale or moneys are forfeited by a 
                cartel known to produce or distribute opioid products, 
                including fentanyl.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
31.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



I,
Wes Brazell, certify that:



|1. | I
    have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of TearLab Corporation; and                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|2. | Based
    on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
    to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
    to the period covered by this report.



Dated: March 21, 2016



| | /s/
    Wes Brazell        
| | ---------------------------
| | C.
    Wesley Brazell      
| | Chief
    Financial Officer
#### James V. G. Dubois, Appellant, *v.*The City of Kingston, Respondent.

(Argued December 15, 1881 ;

decided January 17, 1882.)

Reported below, 20 Hun, 500.

*635
      *John E. Yam, Etten*for appellant.

*Charles M. Preston*for respondent.

Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.

All concur.

Appeal, dismissed.
#### § 285.416 [Reserved]
#### § 254.55 Spill response plans for facilities located in Alaska State waters seaward of the coast line in the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas.

Response plans for facilities conducting exploratory drilling operations from a MODU seaward of the coast line in Alaska State waters in the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas must follow the requirements contained within subpart E of this part, in addition to the other requirements of this subpart. Such response plans must address how the source control procedures selected to comply with State law will be integrated into the planning, training, and exercise requirements of §§ 254.70(a), 254.90(a), and 254.90(c), in the event that the proposed operations do not incorporate the capping stack, cap and flow system, containment dome, and/or other similar subsea and surface devices and equipment and vessels referenced in those sections.

[81 FR 46563, July 15, 2016]
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.511 Traveling-block safety device.

All units being used for well-completion operations that have both a traveling block and a crown block must be equipped with a safety device that is designed to prevent the traveling block from striking the crown block. The device must be checked for proper operation weekly and after each drill-line slipping operation. The results of the operational check must be entered in the operations log.
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of BancFirst Corporation

|                                            |  |                       |  |                         |        |  
|------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ------ | -
|                                            |  |                      
|Subsidiary Name                             |  | State ofIncorporation |  | Percentage ofOwnership  |       
|BancFirst                                   |  | Oklahoma              |  |                         | 100.00 | %
|BFC Capital Trust II                        |  | Delaware              |  |                         | 100.00 | %
|Council Oak Partners, LLC                   |  | Oklahoma              |  |                         | 100.00 | %
|BancFirst Insurance Services, Inc.          |  | Oklahoma              |  |                         | 100.00 | %
|Exchange National Bank of Moore             |  | Oklahoma              |  |                         | 100.00 | %
|The Okemah National Bank                    |  | Oklahoma              |  |                         | 100.00 | %
|Union National Statutory Trust I            |  | Delaware              |  |                         | 100.00 | %
|                                           
|Subsidiaries of BancFirst                   | 
|                                            |  |                      
|Subsidiary Name                             |  | State ofIncorporation |  | Percentage 
ofOwnership |       
|Council Oak Investment Corporation          |  | Oklahoma              |  |                         | 100.00 | %
|Council Oak Real Estate, Inc.               |  | Oklahoma              |  |                         | 100.00 | %
|BancFirst Agency, Inc.                      |  | Oklahoma              |  |                         | 100.00 | %
|Lenders Collection Corporation              |  | Oklahoma              |  |                         | 100.00 | %
|BancFirst Community Development Corporation |  | Oklahoma              |  |                         | 100.00 | %
### §41738. Fitness of air carriers

Notwithstanding section 40109(a) and (c)–(h) of this title, an air carrier may provide air service to an eligible place or air transportation to a place designated under section 41736 of this title only when the Secretary of Transportation decides that—

(1) the carrier is fit, willing, and able to perform the service or transportation; and

(2) aircraft used to provide the service or transportation, and operations related to the service or transportation, conform to the safety standards prescribed by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1152.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 41738 | 49 App.:1389(e)(1). | Aug. 23, 1958, Pub. L. 85–726, 72 Stat. 731, §419(e)(1); added Oct. 24, 1978, Pub. L. 95–504, §33(a), 92 Stat. 1732; Dec. 8, 1983, Pub. L. 98–213, §10, 97 Stat. 1461; Oct. 4, 1984, Pub. L. 98–443, §9(r), 98 Stat. 1708; restated Dec. 30, 1987, Pub. L. 100–223, §202(a)(1), (2), (b)(1), 101 Stat. 1507, 1515. |

Section

In this section, before clause (1), the words "air transportation to a place" are substituted for "service to a point" for consistency with the source provisions restated in sections 41733, 41735, and 41736 of the revised title. In clauses (1) and (2), the words "service or transportation" are substituted for "such service" for consistency with the source provisions restated in sections 41733, 41735, and 41736 of the revised title.
|   | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Tengion, Inc.; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |
|--------|
|   | /s/ Steven Nichtberger |
|   | Steven Nichtberger, MD |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

----
#### Mideast Securities Corp., Respondent, v. RKO General, Inc., Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, McNally and Eager, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.4


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


I, Keith Favreau, the Chief Financial Officer of Odd Job Stores, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

           (1) The accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending September
           30, 2003 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
           (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
           or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.



Date: November 14, 2003                  By: /s/  Keith Favreau
                                             -----------------------------
                                             Keith Favreau
                                             Chief Financial Officer
### §14914. Civil penalty procedures

(a) In General.—After notice and an opportunity for a hearing, a person found by the Surface Transportation Board to have violated a provision of law that the Board carries out or a regulation prescribed under that law by the Board that is related to transportation which occurs under subchapter II of chapter 135 for which a civil penalty is provided, is liable to the United States for the civil penalty provided. The amount of the civil penalty shall be assessed by the Board by written notice. In determining the amount of the penalty, the Board shall consider the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the prohibited acts committed and, with respect to the violator, the degree of culpability, any history of prior offenses, ability to pay, and other matters that justice requires.

(b) Compromise.—The Board may compromise, modify, or remit, with or without consideration, a civil penalty until the assessment is referred to the Attorney General.

(c) Collection.—If a person fails to pay an assessment of a civil penalty after it has become final, the Board may refer the matter to the Attorney General for collection in an appropriate district court of the United States.

(d) Refunds.—The Board may refund or remit a civil penalty collected under this section if—

(1) application has been made for refund or remission of the penalty within 1 year from the date of payment; and

(2) the Board finds that the penalty was unlawfully, improperly, or excessively imposed.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §103, Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 918.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
### §372. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, acts June 5, 1920, ch. 265, 41 Stat. 1059; Aug. 3, 1955, ch. 496, §3, 69 Stat. 444, which modified restrictions upon location of homestead sites, was omitted in view of admission of Alaska into the Union.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsImproving Power Density of Free-Piston Stirling EnginesAnalyses and experiments demonstrate the potential benefits of optimizing piston and displacer motion in a free-piston Stirling Engine. Isothermal analysis shows the theoretical limits of power density improvement due to ideal motion in ideal Stirling engines. More realistic models based on nodal analysis show that ideal piston and displacer waveforms are not optimal, often producing less power than engines that use sinusoidal piston and displacer motion. Constrained optimization using nodal analysis predicts that Stirling engine power density can be increased by as much as 58 percent using optimized higher harmonic piston and displacer motion. An experiment is conducted in which an engine designed for sinusoidal motion is forced to operate with both second and third harmonics, resulting in a piston power increase of as much as 14 percent. Analytical predictions are compared to experimental data and show close agreement with indirect thermodynamic power calculations, but poor agreement with direct electrical power measurements.Document ID20160014881Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBriggs, Maxwell H.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Prahl, Joseph M.*(Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, OH, United States)*Loparo, Kenneth A.*(Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredDecember 29, 2016Publication DateDecember 1, 2016Subject CategoryEngineering (General)Report/Patent NumberGRC-E-DAA-TN34746AIAA Paper 2016-5016E-19291NASA/TM-2016-219383Meeting InformationMeeting: International Energy Conversions Engineering Conference (IECEC)Location: Salt Lake City, UTCountry: United StatesStart Date: July 25, 2016End Date: July 27, 2016Sponsors:American Inst. of Aeronautics and AstronauticsFunding Number(s)WBS: WBS 887359.04.01.04.03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Keywordsaerospace engineeringcogenerationStirling enginesheat engines power generationpower generation controlthermodynamicsspace technologyAvailable DownloadsNameType20160014881.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle20170001730See AlsoImproving Power Density of Free-Piston Stirling Enginesvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024