alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(LOGO)
Deloitte & Touche LLP


Two Prudential Plaza
180 North Stetson Avenue
Chicago, Illinois 60601-6779

Telephone: (312) 946-3000
Facsimile: (312) 946-2600

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT

Board of Directors and Stockholder
NOVUS Credit Services, Inc. and subsidiaries
Riverwoods, Illinois

Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
Trustee
Minneapolis, Minnesota

We have examined  management's  assertion  about the  compliance of NOVUS Credit
Services,  Inc. and  subsidiaries  (the  "Company")  with the minimum  servicing
standards  identified in the Mortgage Bankers  Association of America's  Uniform
Single Attestation  Program for Mortgage Bankers ("USAP") for the Morgan Stanley
Pass Through Certificates, Series 1998 - 1 as of and for the year ended December
31, 1998  included  in the  accompanying  management  assertion.  Management  is
responsible for the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's  assertion about the
Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's  compliance  with the
minimum  servicing   standards  and  performing  such  other  procedures  as  we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination  on the  Company's  compliance  with the minimum  servicing
standards.

In our  opinion,  management's  assertion  that the  Company  complied  with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December
31, 1998 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

March 12, 1999
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.102 What does this part do?

(a) This part 250 contains the regulations of the BSEE Offshore program that govern oil, gas, and sulphur exploration, development, and production operations on the OCS. When you conduct operations on the OCS, you must submit requests, applications, and notices, or provide supplemental information for BSEE approval.

(b) The following table of general references shows where to look for information about these processes.

| For information about . . . | Refer to . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (1) Applications for permit to drill, | 30 CFR part 250, subpart D. |
| (2) Development and Production Plans (DPP), | 30 CFR part 550, subpart B. |
| (3) Downhole commingling, | 30 CFR part 250, subpart K. |
| (4) Exploration Plans (EP), | 30 CFR part 550, subpart B. |
| (5) Flaring, | 30 CFR part 250, subpart K. |
| (6) Gas measurement, | 30 CFR part 250, subpart L. |
| (7) Off-lease geological and geophysical permits, | 30 CFR part 551. |
| (8) Oil spill financial responsibility coverage, | 30 CFR part 553. |
| (9) Oil and gas production safety systems, | 30 CFR part 250, subpart H. |
| (10) Oil spill response plans, | 30 CFR part 254. |
| (11) Oil and gas well-completion operations, | 30 CFR part 250, subpart E. |
| (12) Oil and gas well-workover operations, | 30 CFR part 250, subpart F. |
| (13) Decommissioning Activities, | 30 CFR part 250, subpart Q. |
| (14) Platforms and structures, | 30 CFR part 250, subpart I. |
| (15) Pipelines and Pipeline Rights-of-Way, | 30 CFR part 250, subpart J and 30 CFR part 550, subpart J. |
| (16) Sulphur operations, | 30 CFR part 250, subpart P. |
| (17) Training, | 30 CFR part 250, subpart O. |
| (18) Unitization, | 30 CFR part 250, subpart M. |
| (19) Safety and Environmental Management Systems (SEMS), | 30 CFR part 250, subpart S. |

[76 FR 64462, Oct. 18, 2011, as amended at 36148, June 6, 2016]
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.711 What are the requirements for well-control drills? You must conduct a weekly well-control drill with all personnel engaged in well operations. Your drill must familiarize personnel engaged in well operations with their roles and functions so that they can perform their duties promptly and efficiently as outlined in the well-control plan required by § 250.710. ( a ) *Timing of drills.* You must conduct each drill during a period of activity that minimizes the risk to operations. The timing of your drills must cover a range of different operations, including drilling with a diverter, on-bottom drilling, and tripping. The same drill may not be repeated consecutively with the same crew.
( b ) *Recordkeeping requirements.* For each drill, you must record the following in the daily report: ( 1 ) Date, time, and type of drill conducted;
( 2 ) The amount of time it took to be ready to close the diverter or use each well-control component of BOP system; and
( 3 ) The total time to complete the entire drill.
( c ) *A BSEE ordered drill.* A BSEE representative may require you to conduct a well-control drill during a BSEE inspection. The BSEE representative will consult with your onsite representative before requiring the drill.
#### D. W. Franchot *&*Company, Inc., et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. Charles S. Hopkins, et al., Respondents-Appellants.

Order unanimously reversed, with $25 costs and disbursements to the plaintiffs and defendants’ motion denied, without costs. Memorandum: The defendants’ motion is for an order dismissing the complaint. The order appealed from did not grant the motion to dismiss the entire complaint, nor did it dismiss either of the two causes of action contained in it. It ordered that the first and second causes of action be dismissed, insofar as they respectively relate to certain leases and that the complaint be deemed amended by striking all references to such leases from the respective causes of action. Special Term erred in striking such allegations from the complaint and letting the remainder of the complaint stand. Such relief was not invoked by the notice of motion and could not properly be granted on a motion to dismiss the complaint. *(Keller*v. *Levy,*265 App. Div. 723; *Matter of Siemer*v. *Village Bd. of the Vil. of Orchard Park,*286 App. Div. 135.) The complaint substantially sets forth the essentials necessary for relief under article 15 of the Real Property Law (Real Property Law, § 502; *Niagara Falls Power Co.*v. *White,*292 N. Y. 472, 479, 480; *Gifford*v. *Whittemore,*4 A D 2d 379) and for a declaration of the rights of the parties (Civ. Prac. Act, § 473; Rules Civ. Prac., rules 210-214). The motion should, therefore, have been denied. (Cross appeals from order of Steuben Special Term, granting in part defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint and denying the motion otherwise.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpem and Henry, JJ.
§ 886.335 Management and occupancy reviews. ( a ) The contract administrator will conduct management and occupancy reviews to determine whether the owner is in compliance with the Contract. Such reviews will be conducted in accordance with a schedule set out by the Secretary and published in the Federal Register, following notice and the opportunity to comment. Where a change in ownership or management occurs, a management and occupancy review must be conducted within six months.
( b ) HUD or the Contract Administrator may inspect project operations and units at any time.
( c ) Equal Opportunity reviews may be conducted by HUD at any time.
[87 FR 37997, June 27, 2022]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA Benefit Analysis of Infusing Wireless into Aircraft and Fleet Operations - Report to Seedling Project Efficient Reconfigurable Cockpit Design and Fleet Operations Using Software Intensive, Network Enabled, Wireless Architecture (ECON)We report on an examination of potential benefits of infusing wireless technologies into various areas of aircraft and airspace operations. The analysis is done in support of a NASA seedling project Efficient Reconfigurable Cockpit Design and Fleet Operations Using Software Intensive, Network Enabled Wireless Architecture (ECON). The study has two objectives. First, we investigate one of the main benefit hypotheses of the ECON proposal: that the replacement of wired technologies with wireless would lead to significant weight reductions on an aircraft, among other benefits. Second, we advance a list of wireless technology applications and discuss their system benefits. With regard to the primary hypothesis, we conclude that the promise of weight reduction is premature. Specificity of the system domain and aircraft, criticality of components, reliability of wireless technologies, the weight of replacement or augmentation equipment, and the cost of infusion must all be taken into account among other considerations, to produce a reliable estimate of weight savings or increase.Document ID20170000683Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsAlexandrov, Natalia*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Holmes, Bruce J.*(Nextgen Apps Co. Williamsburg, VA, United States)*Hahn, Andrew S.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredJanuary 20, 2017Publication DateDecember 1, 2016Subject CategoryAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberL-20758NASA/TM-2016-219360NF1676L-25540Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 154692.02.40.07.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20170000683.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 960.407 Selection preference for mixed population developments. ( a ) The PHA must give preference to elderly families and disabled families equally in determining priority for admission to mixed population developments. The PHA may not establish a limit on the number of elderly families or disabled families who may be accepted for occupancy in a mixed population development.
( b ) In selecting elderly families and disabled families to occupy units in mixed population developments, the PHA must first offer units that have special accessibility features for persons with disabilities to families who include persons with disabilities who require the accessibility features of such units (see §§ 8.27 and 100.202 of this title).
[65 FR 16729, Mar. 29, 2000]
§ 1210.158 What reports must I submit to designate someone to make my royalty payments? ( a ) *General.* You must submit Form ONRR-4425, Designation Form for Royalty Payment Responsibility, if you want to designate a person to make royalty payments on your behalf under § 1218.52 of this chapter.
( b ) *Reporting options.* You must submit Form ONRR-4425 manually. You may find the form at *http://www.onrr.gov/FM/Forms/AFSOil_Gas.htm .*
( c ) *Reporting address.* You must submit completed Form ONRR-4425 by: ( 1 ) U.S. Postal Service regular or express mail addressed to Office of Natural Resources Revenue, P.O. Box 25165, MS 633000B, Denver, CO 80225-0165; or
( 2 ) Special courier or overnight mail addressed to Office of Natural Resources Revenue, Building 85, Room A322, Denver Federal Center, West 6th Ave. and Kipling Blvd., Denver, Colorado 80225.
[48 FR 35641, Aug. 5, 1983, as amended at 76 FR 76615, Dec. 8, 2011; 77 FR 25879, 25880, May 2, 2012; 87 FR 21745, Apr. 13, 2022]
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3404 

To authorize the grant program for elimination of the nationwide backlog 

in analyses of DNA samples at the level necessary to completely eliminate 

the backlog and obtain a DNA sample from every person convicted 

of a qualifying offense. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2005 

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To authorize the grant program for elimination of the nationwide backlog in analyses of DNA samples at the level 

necessary to completely eliminate the backlog and obtain 

a DNA sample from every person convicted of a qualifying offense. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘DNA Database Com5 pletion Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•HR 3404 IH 

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF DNA BACKLOG GRANTS AT 

2 LEVEL NECESSARY TO COMPLETELY ELIMI3 NATE BACKLOG AND OBTAIN DNA SAMPLES 

4 FROM ALL PERSONS CONVICTED OF QUALI5 FYING OFFENSES. 

6 Subsection (j) of section 2 of the DNA Analysis 

7 Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 14135) is 

8 amended to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘(j) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

10 are authorized to be appropriated to the Attorney General 

11 for grants under subsection (a)— 

12 ‘‘(1) for grants under paragraph (1) of such 

13 subsection, $100,000,000 for each of fiscal years 

14 2005 through 2009; and 

15 ‘‘(2) for grants under other paragraphs of such 

16 subsection, $151,000,000 for each of fiscal years 

17 2005 through 2009.’’. 

Æ
EXHIBIT 13.1



Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of The9 Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jun Zhu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: June 30, 2005
|                    | 
|By:                 |  | /s/    Jun Zhu         
|Name:               |  | Jun Zhu                
|Title:              |  | Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.289 What must the Conceptual Plan contain? In the Conceptual Plan, you must explain the general design basis and philosophy that you will use to develop the field. You must include the following information: ( a ) An overview of the development concept(s);
( b ) A well location plat;
( c ) The system control type (*i.e.,* direct hydraulic or electro-hydraulic); and
( d ) The distance from each of the wells to the host platform.
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.12
 AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO THE SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT OF
CALAMOS HOLDINGS LLC
    1.
    
    Amendment. Section 2.06 of the Limited Liability Company Agreement is hereby
amended to add Calamos Capital LLC immediately after Calamos Financial Services LLC.2.
    
    Reaffirmation. In all other respects the Limited Liability Company Agreement
remains the same and in full force and effect.3.
    
    Effective Date. This Amendment No. 1 shall become effective as of the date
first written above (the Effective Date). On and after the Effective Date of this
Amendment No. 1, each reference in the Limited Liability Company Agreement to this
Agreement, hereunder, hereof, or words of like import referring to the Limited
Liability Company Agreement shall mean and be a reference to the Limited Liability Company
Agreement as amended by this Amendment No. 1.4.
    
    Governing Law. The validity and construction of this Amendment No. 1 shall
be determined and governed in all respects by the laws of the State of Delaware without
regard to conflict of laws principles.
  CALAMOS ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC.
    
    CALAMOS FAMILY PARTNERS, INC.By: /s/ James S. Hamman, Jr.
    
    By: /s/ John P. Calamos, Sr.James S. Hamman, Jr.
    
    John P. Calamos, Sr.EVP, General Counsel & Secretary/s/ John P. Calamos, Sr.John P. Calamos, Sr.
### §31114. Access to the Interstate System

(a) Prohibition on Denying Access.—A State may not enact or enforce a law denying to a commercial motor vehicle subject to this subchapter or subchapter I of this chapter reasonable access between—

(1) the Dwight D. Eisenhower System of Interstate and Defense Highways (except a segment exempted under section 31111(f) or 31113(e) of this title) and other qualifying Federal-aid Primary System highways designated by the Secretary of Transportation; and

(2) terminals, facilities for food, fuel, repairs, and rest, and points of loading and unloading for household goods carriers, motor carriers of passengers, any towaway trailer transporter combination (as defined in section 31111(a)), or any truck tractor-semitrailer combination in which the semitrailer has a length of not more than 28.5 feet and that generally operates as part of a vehicle combination described in section 31111(c) of this title.

(b) Exception.—This section does not prevent a State or local government from imposing reasonable restrictions, based on safety considerations, on a truck tractor-semitrailer combination in which the semitrailer has a length of not more than 28.5 feet and that generally operates as part of a vehicle combination described in section 31111(c) of this title.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 999; Pub. L. 114–94, div. A, title V, §5523(c)(2), Dec. 4, 2015, 129 Stat. 1560.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 31114(a) | 49 App.:2312(a). | Jan. 6, 1983, Pub. L. 97–424, §412, 96 Stat. 2160; Oct. 30, 1984, Pub. L. 98–554, §§104(c), 106, 98 Stat. 2831, 2832; Dec. 18, 1991, Pub. L. 102–240, §4006(b)(2), 105 Stat. 2151. |
| 31114(b) | 49 App.:2312(b). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "Dwight D. Eisenhower System of Interstate and Defense Highways" are substituted for "Interstate and Defense Highway System" for consistency in the revised chapter.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2015—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 114–94 inserted "any towaway trailer transporter combination (as defined in section 31111(a))," after "passengers,".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2015 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–94 effective Oct. 1, 2015, see section 1003 of Pub. L. 114–94, set out as a note under section 5313 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0070

SAT Date: 11/9/2012

Print Date: 2/4/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 3

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: IRR-E,S,L,MM, LUNG, UNCERT-SENS, AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0063-77

FATE: Estimations for 

Liquid with MP < 25 C (E)

log Kow = 3.30 (E) 

S = Dispersible / 73.2 mg/L at 25 C (ICB / E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

log Koc = 5.66 (E)

log Fish BCF = 1.85 (E)
log Fish BAF = 1.79 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong

PBT Potential: P1B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is poor through the skin, moderate through 

the GI tract, and good through the lungs based on analogs. The PMN material is expected to be 

a strong irritant to all exposed tissues based on the amines and the surfactant properties of the 

material. There is also concern for lung effects if respirable particles are inhaled based on 

cationic binding to lung tissues and/or interference with the natural surfactant balance in the 

lungs. There is uncertain concern for sensitization for the . Moderate 

concern. 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 0.28

daphnid 48-h LC50 0.050

green algal 96-h EC50 0.018

fish _ chronic value 0.004

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.006

algal _ chronic 

value

0.008

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for aliphatic amines and amides; 

SAR chemical class = aliphatic amine, amide; ; liquid; log Kow = 5.67 (EPI); S = 

dispersible in water at 25 C (P); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active 

ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness < 150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC 

<2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

1

SARs aliphatic amines and amides

SAR Class aliphatic amine, amide

Ecotox Category Aliphatic Amines
Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Becky Jones
### §1112. Special boards of inquiry on air transportation safety

(a) Establishment.—If an accident involves a substantial question about public safety in air transportation, the National Transportation Safety Board may establish a special board of inquiry composed of—

(1) one member of the Board acting as chairman; and

(2) 2 members representing the public, appointed by the President on notification of the establishment of the special board of inquiry.

(b) Qualifications and Conflicts of Interest.—The public members of a special board of inquiry must be qualified by training and experience to participate in the inquiry and may not have a pecuniary interest in an aviation enterprise involved in the accident to be investigated.

(c) Authority.—A special board of inquiry has the same authority that the Board has under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(d), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 747.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1112 | 49 App.:1443. | Aug. 23, 1958, Pub. L. 85–726, §703, 72 Stat. 782. |
| | 49 App.:1655(d) (1st sentence). | Oct. 15, 1966, Pub. L. 89–670, §6(d) (1st sentence), 80 Stat. 938. |
| | 49 App.:1903(a)(1)(A). | Jan. 3, 1975, Pub. L. 93–633, §304(a)(1)(A), 88 Stat. 2168. |

Section

In subsection (c), the words "when convened to investigate an accident certified to it by the National Transportation Safety Board" are omitted as surplus.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Arthur Ulisse, Appellant.

Motion by appellant to dispense with printing. It appears .that appellant was charged with and convicted of violating section 986 of the Penal Law (a misdemeanor) in the County Court, Westchester County. Under the circumstances, the appeal was erroneously taken to this court. The Appellate Term of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department is presently vested with the jurisdiction of such appeals from the County Court, Westchester County. Accordingly, the motion to dispense with printing and the appeal are transferred to said Appellate Term of the Supreme Court (see N. Y. Const., art. VI, § 5, subd. b; § 8, subd. d; order No. 47 of this court, dated July 12, 1962). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.