alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 1206
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1206 (formerly part 206) appear at 67 FR 19111, Apr. 18, 2002.

§ 1206.163 What are my reporting requirements under a non-arm's-length processing contract? ( a ) You must use a separate entry on form ONRR-2014 to notify ONRR of an allowance based on non-arm's-length processing costs that you or your affiliate incur(s).
( b ) ( 1 ) For new non-arm's-length processing facilities or arrangements, you must base your initial deduction on estimates of allowable gas processing costs for the applicable period.
( 2 ) You must use your or your affiliate's most recently available operations data for the processing plant as your estimate, if available. If such data is not available, you must use estimates based on data for similar processing plants.
( 3 ) Section 1206.165 applies when you amend your report based on your actual costs.
( c ) ONRR may require you or your affiliate to submit all data used to calculate the allowance deduction. You can find recordkeeping requirements in parts 1207 and 1212 of this chapter.
( d ) If you are authorized under § 1206.161(j) to use an exception to the requirement to calculate your actual processing costs, you must follow the reporting requirements of § 1206.162.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of HouseValues, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert B. Allen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: March 2,2007
### §1200. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act July 6, 1954, ch. 463, §3, 68 Stat. 453, which related to determination of just compensation for property conveyed under former section 1199(a) of this title, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### § 550.1153 When must I conduct a static bottomhole pressure survey?

(a) You must conduct a static bottomhole pressure survey under the following conditions:

| If you have . . . | Then you must conduct . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (1) A new producing reservoir, | A static bottomhole pressure survey within 90 days after the date of first continuous production. |
| (2) A reservoir with three or more producing completions, | Annual static bottomhole pressure surveys in a sufficient number of key wells to establish an average reservoir pressure. The Regional Supervisor may require that bottomhole pressure surveys be performed on specific wells. |

(b) Your bottomhole pressure survey must meet the following requirements:

(1) You must shut-in the well for a minimum period of 4 hours to ensure stabilized conditions; and

(2) The bottomhole pressure survey must consist of a pressure measurement at mid-perforation, and pressure measurements and gradient information for at least four gradient stops coming out of the hole.

(c) You must submit to the Regional Supervisor the results of all static bottomhole pressure surveys on Form BOEM-140, Bottomhole Pressure Survey Report, within 60 days after the date of the survey.

(d) The Regional Supervisor may grant a departure from the requirement to run a static bottomhole pressure survey. To request a departure, you must submit a justification, along with Form BOEM-0140, Bottomhole Pressure Survey Report, showing a calculated bottomhole pressure or any measured data.

[76 FR 64623, Oct. 18, 2011, as amended at 80 FR 57096, Sept. 22, 2015]
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

GABRIEL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, AND

TRACE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, SNAPTRACK, INC.,

AND NORMAN KRASNER,

Defendants-Appellees.

______________________ 

2013-1058

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of California in No. 08-CV-1992, Judge 

Anthony J. Battaglia.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

MICHAEL E. SALZMAN, Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, 

of New York, New York, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. 

With him on the brief was RONALD ABRAMSON. Of counsel 

was PETER A. SULLIVAN. 

TIMOTHY S. TETER, Cooley LLP, of Palo Alto, California, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the 

brief were JEFFREY S. KARR and LORI R. MASON, of Palo 
 

Alto, California, and STEVEN M. STRAUSS, of San Diego, 

California.

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MAYER, and CHEN, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 18, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
#### Elizabeth Egnoto, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent.

Motion granted to extent that appeal may be prosecuted upon one copy of stenographer’s minutes, an original and five typewritten copies of the judgment roll and five typewritten briefs; appeal dismissed unless typewritten records and briefs are filed on or before July 15, 1960.
----

|   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|

|   | GENERAL COMMUNICATION, INC.                            |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |   |

|   | State of Alaska                                                |   | 0-15279                |   | 92-0072737                         |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|--------|
|   | (State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization) |   | Commission File Number |   | (I.R.S EmployerIdentification No.) |   |

|   | 2550 Denali Street                       |   |       |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|------------|--------|
|   | Suite 1000                               |   |       |   |
|   | Anchorage, Alaska                        |   | 99503      |   |
|   | (Address of principal executive offices) |   | (Zip Code) |   |

|   | NONE                                                          |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | (Former name or former address, if changed since last report) |   |

|   | o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----

|                     |   |   | GENERAL COMMUNICATION, INC.              |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|                     |   |   | (Registrant)                             |
|                     |   |   |                                     |
| Date: September 14, 2012 |   |   |                                     |
|                     |   |   |                                     |
|                     |   | By     |  /s/ John M. Lowber                 |
|                     |   |   | Name: John M. Lowber                     |
|                     |   |   | Title:  Senior Vice President, |
|                     |   |   | Chief Financial Officer,                 |
|                     |   |   | Secretary and Treasurer                  |
|                     |   |   | (Principal Financial Officer)            |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC Form
10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statments.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          41,946
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  165,863
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                       5,353,235
<DEPRECIATION>                               (315,572)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,908,896
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                      3,746,992
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,885,733<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,908,896
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               242,414
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  130,708
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   975
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              67,918
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,062
<INCOME-TAX>                                    43,062
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             43,062
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (23,247)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,815
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08<F3>
<FN>
<F1>The Operating Partnership does not report using a classified Balance Sheet.
<F2>Amount represents Partners' equity.
<F3>Amounts represent earnings per unit of partnership interest.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 13.2



Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of The9 Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Hannah Lee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: June 30, 2005



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Hannah Lee         
|Name:  |  | Hannah Lee             
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Rick G. Lester, certify that:     (1) I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Mariner Energy, Inc.;     (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     (4) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have:     a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     (5) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):     a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 10, 2006       /s/ Rick G. Lester Rick G. Lester,
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nathaniel Hill, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on May 17, 1976, unanimously affirmed. Application by respondent on the call of the calendar for permission to submit an additional letter is denied. No opinion. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Silverman, Fein and Sullivan, JJ.
§ 882.403 ACC, housing assistance payments contract, and lease. ( a ) *Maximum Total ACC Commitments.* The maximum total annual contribution that may be contracted for is the total of the Moderate Rehabilitation Fair Market Rents for all the units. The fee for the costs of PHA administration is payable out of the annual contribution.
( b ) *Project account.* ( 1 ) A project account will be established and maintained by HUD as a specifically identified and segregated account for each project. The account will contain the sum of the amounts by which the maximum annual commitment exceeds the amount actually paid out for the project under the ACC each year. Payments will be made from this account when needed to cover increases in Contract Rents or decreases in Gross Family Contributions for ( i ) housing assistance (including vacancy) payments,
( ii ) the amount of the fee for PHA costs of administration, and
( iii ) other costs specifically approved by the Secretary.
( 2 ) When a HUD-approved estimate of required payments under the ACC for a fiscal year exceeds the maximum annual commitment, and would cause the amount in the project account to be less than 40 percent of the maximum, HUD will, within a reasonable period of time, take such additional steps authorized by Section 8(c)(6) of the U.S. Housing Act of 1937, as may be necessary, to assure that payments under the ACC will be adequate to cover increases in Contract Rents and decreases in Gross Family Contributions.
( c ) *Term of Housing Assistance Payments Contract.* The Contract for any unit rehabilitated in accordance with the Program must be for a term of 15 years.
( d ) *Term of Lease.* ( 1 ) The initial lease between the family and the Owner must be for at least one year or the term of the HAP contract, whichever is shorter. In cases where there is less than one year remaining on the HAP contract, the owner and the PHA may mutually agree to terminate the unit from the HAP contract instead of leasing the unit to an eligible family.
( 2 ) Any renewal or extension of the lease term for any unit must in no case extend beyond the remaining term of the HAP contract.
[47 FR 34379, Aug. 9, 1982, as amended at 64 FR 53869, Oct. 4, 1999]
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-22-00353-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.W.S., J.R.S., AND M.S., CHILDREN

From the 13th District Court

Navarro County, Texas

Trial Court No. D21-29633-CV

ABATEMENT ORDER

This is an appeal of an order that terminated B.S.'s parental rights. B.S.'s courtappointed trial counsel filed a notice of appeal on B.S.'s behalf but was subsequently 

allowed to withdraw. In the order granting the motion to withdraw, no attorney was 

appointed to represent B.S. in this appeal. The clerk's record had been filed before the 

attorney was allowed to withdraw. Neither the trial court nor the trial court clerk 

forwarded the withdrawal order to this Court.

The notice of appeal, filed on October 27, 2022, alleges that B.S. is presumed to be 

indigent and may proceed without advance payment of costs. As an indigent party in 

this termination proceeding, B.S. is entitled to the appointment of counsel on appeal. 
In the Interest of R.W.S., J.R.S., and M.S., Children Page 2

Therefore, we abate this proceeding and remand it to the trial court for the appointment 

of counsel to represent B.S.

The trial court is ordered to appoint counsel to represent B.S. on appeal within 

seven days of the date of this order. A supplemental clerk's record is ordered to be filed 

with this Court with the name and contact information of B.S.'s appointed counsel within 

seven days after the trial court's appointment of counsel. 

This proceeding will be automatically reinstated without further Order of this 

Court upon the filing of the supplemental clerk's record containing the name and contact 

information of B.S.'s appointed counsel. All briefing deadlines will commence on the 

date the supplemental clerk's record appointing new counsel is filed with this Court.

Because the trial court ordered the entire record sealed on its own motion for 

reasons which are not explained or supported by the record, the trial court is further 

ordered to ensure that counsel for B.S. and all other parties have full access to the clerk's 

and reporter's records in this proceeding immediately upon counsel's appointment and 

for the duration of the appeal.

PER CURIAM 

Before Chief Justice Gray, 

Justice Johnson, and 

Justice Smith 

Abated and remanded to trial court

Order issued and filed December 21, 2022

[RWR]
#### § 401.1 Purpose.

The regulations in this part are issued pursuant to title I of the Water Research Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-242, 98 Stat. 97) which authorizes appropriations to, and confers authority upon, the Secretary of the Interior to promote a national program of water-resources research.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
David Simon, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Simon Property Group, L.P.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date:    August 14, 2003 |  |                                                                                                                                
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  | /s/ David SimonDavid Simon
Chief Executive Officer
of Simon Property Group, Inc.,
General Partner of Simon Property Group, L.P.

27

---

QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. Rudolph Hahn, Defendant. The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. Rudolph Hahn and David Hulsberg, Defendants.

Motion to dismiss two pending motions to dismiss indictments, granted. The granting of this motion is without prejudice to an application by defendants, pursuant to statute (L. 1960, ch. 164, effective March 8, 1960, amending Judiciary Law, § 149, subd. 2), to a Justice of this court for permission to have said motions to dismiss the indictments heard at a term of this court. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta and Christ, JJ., concur; Kleinfeld J., not voting.