alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 285.908 What must I include in my decommissioning notice? ( a ) The decommissioning notice is distinct from your decommissioning application and may only be submitted following approval of your decommissioning application, as described in §§ 285.905 through 285.907. You must submit a decommissioning notice at least 60 days before you plan to begin decommissioning activities.
( b ) Your decommissioning notice must include: ( 1 ) A description of any changes to the approved removal methods and procedures in your approved decommissioning application, including changes to the types of vessels and equipment you will use; and
( 2 ) An updated decommissioning schedule.
( c ) BSEE will review your decommissioning notice and may require you to resubmit a decommissioning application if BSEE determines that your decommissioning activities would: ( 1 ) Result in a significant change in the impacts previously identified and evaluated;
( 2 ) Require any additional Federal permits; or
( 3 ) Propose activities not previously identified and evaluated.
EXHIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATIONI, Leo S. Ullman, Chief Executive Officer of Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. (the “Company”), pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify as follows:1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2006 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and2. The information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certification this 9th day of March 2007.                                                                                    /s/ LEO S. ULLMAN   Leo S. Ullman,   Chief Executive Officer
### §1245. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, acts Jan. 17, 1933, ch. 11, §15, 47 Stat. 769; Mar. 24, 1934, ch. 84, §15, 48 Stat. 464, related to statutes continued in force, and was omitted in view of recognition of Philippine independence.
#### § 285.911 [Reserved]
oe

LEARN ABOUT U.S. CITIZENSHIP
AND PREPARE FOR THE TEST

Interested in learning more about U.S.
citizenship? USCIS has a website to
help you prepare. The Citizenship
Resource Center includes: Z

¢ Naturalization eligibility requirements

¢ The Application for Naturalization,
Form N-400

* Current filing fees and processing
times

* English and Civics study materials
+ Learning activities
* Video and audio resources

¢ Information on upcoming USCIS
citizenship events

* An English and citizenship class
locator

* Tips on finding help in your
community

x

Visit www.uscis.gov/citizenship
today to get started!

IMMIGRANTS FROM AROUND THE WO

PROUD AM

US. Citizenship
and Immigration
Services



a

PREPARE ADULT IMMIGRANTS FOR CITIZENSHIP
FIND CLASSROOM RESOURCES

If your organization is looking for citizenship teaching materials and
technical resources, USCIS has a website to help your program. The
Citizenship Resource Center includes:

¢ Lesson plans and activities

¢ Citizenship publications and manuals

¢ Online professional development tools

* Podcasts and videos

¢ Information on upcoming training opportunities
¢ Promising practices from experienced providers

¢ Federal funding opportunities

You can also add your English and citizenship classes to America’s
Literacy Directory, a website that allows users to find local literacy
providers in all 50 states and the U.S. territories.

Visit www.uscis.gov/citizenship today to learn more!

US. Citizenship

and Immigration
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 127801(37) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 127801 

 COA: 249414 

Saginaw CC: 03-022659-FH 

ROY TILLMAN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of July 

26, 2005 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

d1121 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2005 

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5
<MULTIPLIER>            1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,542
<ALLOWANCES>                                       456
<INVENTORY>                                         72
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,100
<PP&E>                                           1,416
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (976)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,489
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,695
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        52,652
<OTHER-SE>                                    (37,467)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,489
<SALES>                                          9,547
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,547
<CGS>                                            8,668
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,668
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,508
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (2,629)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (64)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,565)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,565)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,565)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)


</TABLE>
### §852. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–35, title XI, §1188(e), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 699

Section, Pub. L. 94–210, title VII, §702, Feb. 5, 1976, 90 Stat. 120, set forth provisions relating to the Operations Review Panel.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1981, see section 1189 of Pub. L. 97–35.
§ 19.13 Instructions for handling future changes in lamp design. All approvals are granted with the understanding that the manufacturer will make his lamp according to the drawings which he has submitted to MSHA and which have been considered and included in the approval. Therefore, when he desires to make any change in the design of the lamp, he should first of all obtain MSHA's approval of the change. The procedure is as follows: ( a ) ( 1 ) The manufacturer shall write to the U.S. Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration, Approval and Certification Center, 765 Technology Drive, Triadelphia, WV 26059, requesting an extension of the original approval and stating the change or changes desired. With this letter the manufacturer should submit a revised drawing or drawings showing the changes in detail, and one of each of the changed lamp parts.
( 2 ) Where the applicant for approval has used an independent laboratory under part 6 of this chapter to perform, in whole or in part, the necessary testing and evaluation for approval of changes to an approved product under this part, the applicant must provide to MSHA as part of the approval application: ( i ) Written evidence of the laboratory's independence and current recognition by a laboratory accrediting organization;
( ii ) Complete technical explanation of how the product complies with each requirement in the applicable MSHA product approval requirements;
( iii ) Identification of components or features of the product that are critical to the safety of the product; and
( iv ) All documentation, including drawings and specifications, as submitted to the independent laboratory by the applicant and as required by this part.
( b ) MSHA will consider the application and inspect the drawings and parts to determine whether it will be necessary to make any tests.
( c ) If no tests are necessary, the applicant will be advised of the approval or disapproval of the change by letter from MSHA.
( d ) If tests are judged necessary, the applicant will be advised of the material that will be required.
[Sched. 6D, 4 FR 4003, Sept. 21, 1939, as amended by Supp. 1, 20 FR 2718, Apr. 23, 1955; 43 FR 12314, Mar. 24, 1978; 52 FR 17514, May 8, 1987; 60 FR 35693, July 11, 1995; 68 FR 36419, June 17, 2003; 73 FR 52211, Sept. 9, 2008]
#### VILLAGE OF CHAMPLAIN. Appellant, v McCREA et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

November 11, 1903.)

Action by the village of Champlain against Matilda McCrea and others.

No opinion. Final order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Case No. DA-22-0521

******************************

In re the Marriage of

ANDREA OKLAND,

SECOND ORDER

Petitioner and Appellant, EXTENDING DEADLINE

TO FILE RESPONSE BRIEF

 and

CHRISTOPHER OKLAND, 

Respondent and Appellee.

Appellee, CHRISTOPHER OKLAND, has filed a Second Motion to Extend 

Response Brief Deadline. Good cause appearing, 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Appellee’s Response Brief is now due 

April 13, 2023.

DATED AND ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED BELOW.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 24 2023

03/24/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0521
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Orlando Catapano, Appellant.

Judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered July 14, 1977, affirmed, and case remitted to the County Court for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). No opinion. Martuscello, J. P., Rabin, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3319

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exemption 

from the harbor maintenance tax for certain shipping between United 

States mainland ports. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 18, 2005

Mr. WELDON of Florida (for himself and Mr. SHAYS) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

an exemption from the harbor maintenance tax for certain shipping between United States mainland ports.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Short Sea Shipping 

5 Tax Exemption Act of 2005’’. 
2

•HR 3319 IH 

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM HARBOR MAINTENANCE TAX 

2 FOR CERTAIN SHIPPING BETWEEN UNITED 

3 STATES MAINLAND PORTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4462 of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating subsection 

6 (i) as subsection (j) and by inserting after subsection (h) 

7 the following new subsection: 

8 ‘‘(i) EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN SHIPPING BETWEEN

9 UNITED STATES MAINLAND PORTS.—No tax shall be im10 posed under section 4461(a) with respect to—

11 ‘‘(1) cargo contained in intermodal cargo con12 tainers and loaded by crane on a vessel or cargo 

13 loaded on a vessel by means of wheeled technology 

14 in a port in the United States mainland for trans15 portation to another port in the United States main16 land solely by coastal route or river (or combination 

17 thereof), and 

18 ‘‘(2) the unloading of cargo described in para19 graph (1) in a port in the United States mainland. 

20 For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘United States 

21 mainland’ has the meaning given such term in subsection 

22 (b).’’. 

23 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

24 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

25 of this Act.

Æ
#### § 256.71 Directional drilling.

In accordance with a BOEM-approved exploration plan or development and production plan, a lease may be maintained in force by directional wells drilled under the leased area from surface locations on adjacent or adjoining land not covered by the lease. In such circumstances, drilling shall be considered to have commenced on the leased area when drilling is commenced on the adjacent or adjoining land for the purpose of directional drilling under the leased area through any directional well surfaced on adjacent or adjoining land. Production, drilling or reworking of any such directional well shall be considered production or drilling or reworking operations on the leased area for all purposes of the lease.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Daniel Di Lapo, Appellant, against B. John Tutuska, as Sheriff of the County of Erie, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term, dismissing the writ of habeas corpus.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Halpern, MeClusky and Henry, JJ.
US.Department of Transportation Officeofthe Secretary ofTransportatiOn
Subject: Request for Extension

# J!)~ !Jf2.

# /~/

From: Dennis J. DeV4'y, Chief 

## c:J EAS & Domestic Analysis Division, X-53

To: Dockets Operations, M-30 

# Memorandum

Date: Reply to Attn. of: June 4, 2012
Kevin Schlemmer, X-53 Ext. 63176

By Order 2012-5-10, May 9, 2012, the Department requested proposals from interested air carriers to serve Bradford, DuBois, Oil City/Franklin, PA; Jamestown, NY; Parkersburg, WV/Marietta, OH; and Kirksville, MO, under the Essential Air Service (EAS) program, to be submitted no later than June 7, 2012. OnJune 4, SilverAirways requested an extension to submit proposals to on or about June 21, 2012. In its request, SilverAirways states "[it] does not feel the current deadline date will allow it sufficient time to complete its necessary due diligence in these markets, nor complete negotiations with its codeshare partner." We are hereby granting Silver's request for an extension. Proposals for Bradford, DuBois, Oil City/Franklin, PA; Jamestown, NY; Parkersburg, WV/Marietta, OHare now due no later than June 25, 2012. Proposals for Kirksville, MO, should be submitted bythe original date ofJune 7, 2012.
Dockets: • Bradford (DOT-OST-2003-14528) • DuBois (DOT-OST-2004-17617) • Oil City/Franklin (DOT-OST-1997-2523) • Jamestown (DOT-OST-2003-14950) • Kirksville (DOT-OST-1997-2515) • Parkersburg/Marietta (DOT-OST-2005-20734)
| **Property, Plant and Equipment - Textual Information (Details) (USD $)In Millions, unless otherwise specified** | 12 Months Ended             |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
||
| **Depreciation expense for property, plant and equipment**                                                       |                        |   |   |
| Depreciation expense related to property, plant and equipment                                                    | $ 1,706us-gaap_Depreciation | $ 1,579us-gaap_Depreciation | $ 1,427us-gaap_Depreciation |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
The amount of expense recognized in the current period that reflects the allocation of the cost of tangible assets over the assets' useful lives. Includes production and non-production related depreciation.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 230 -SubTopic 10 -Section 45 -Paragraph 28 -Subparagraph (b) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=31042434&loc=d3e3602-108585
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_Depreciation**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                        |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_DepreciationAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1


                          [BANK OF NEW YORK LETTERHEAD]

                                BANK OF NEW YORK

                              Officer's Certificate

                          -----------------------------
                                February 21, 2006



MERRILL LYNCH DEPOSITOR, INC.
North Tower, 7th Floor
4 World Financial Center
New York, New York 10080

               PREFERREDPLUS, PPLUS TRUST AND INDEXPLUS CERTIFICATE

The undersigned, Thomas J. Bogert, the Vice President-Manager of The Bank of New
York, a New York corporation (the "Trustee"), hereby certifies in such capacity
that, based on his knowledge, the Trustee has complied, in all material
respects, with all conditions and covenants applicable to the Trustee under the
Standard Terms for Trust Agreements dated February 20, 1998 between Merrill
Lynch Depositor, Inc. as depositor (the "Depositor") and the Trustee, as
successor to United States Trust Company of New York, as trustee and securities
intermediary (the "Securities Intermediary"), in each case as amended by a
series supplement between the Depositor, the Trustee and the Securities
Intermediary for each series of trust certificates listed in the attached
schedule.




                                    Very truly yours,

                                    BANK OF NEW YORK


                                    By: /s/ Thomas J. Bogert
                                        ------------------------
                                    Name:  Thomas J. Bogert
                                    Title: Vice President


<PAGE>

                                    SCHEDULE

Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 HLT-1 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 TRV-C1 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1999 REN-C1 Trust
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CCR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLS-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ATT-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series NAI-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series FRD-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series LMG-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CZN-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series QWS-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CTR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series LMG-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series QWS-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ALL-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLC-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ELP-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series MSD-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series VER-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series UPC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series FAR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series GEC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series GRC-1
PPLUS Trust Series PMC-1
PPLUS Trust Series VAL-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSG-1
PPLUS Trust Series FMC-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSG-2
PPLUS Trust Series DCC-1
PPLUS Trust Series CSF-1
PPLUS Trust Series SPR-1
PPLUS Trust Series TWC-1
PPLUS Trust Series CMT-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSC-1
PPLUS Trust Series DCNA-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSC-2
PPLUS Trust Series JPM-1
PPLUS Trust Series LMG-3
INDEXPLUS Trust 2003-1

                                       2
### §42301. Definitions

(a) Defined in Part A.—In this chapter, the terms "common carrier", "marine terminal operator", "ocean common carrier", "ocean transportation intermediary", "shipper", and "shippers' association" have the meaning given those terms in section 40102 of this title.

(b) Other Definitions.—In this chapter:

(1) Foreign carrier.—The term "foreign carrier" means an ocean common carrier a majority of whose vessels are documented under the laws of a foreign country.

(2) Maritime services.—The term "maritime services" means port-to-port transportation of cargo by vessels operated by an ocean common carrier.

(3) Maritime-related services.—The term "maritime-related services" means intermodal operations, terminal operations, cargo solicitation, agency services, ocean transportation intermediary services and operations, and all other activities and services integral to total transportation systems of ocean common carriers and their foreign domiciled affiliates for themselves and others.

(4) United states carrier.—The term "United States carrier" means an ocean common carrier operating vessels documented under the laws of the United States.

(5) United states oceanborne trade.—The term "United States oceanborne trade" means the carriage of cargo between the United States and a foreign country, whether directly or indirectly, by an ocean common carrier.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §7, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1551.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 42301 | 46 App.:1710a(a). | Pub. L. 100–418, title X, §10002(a), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1570; Pub. L. 105–258, title I, §111(1)–(3), Oct. 14, 1998, 112 Stat. 1911. |

Section