alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AFS-11-337-E 

June 15, 2011 

 Exemption No. 10288 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0587 

Ms. Karen Austin 

6108 Maylane Drive 

Baltimore, MD 21212 

Dear Ms. Austin: 

This letter is to inform you that we have denied your petition for exemption. It transmits our 

decision and explains its basis. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated May 25, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of your 3 year old son for an exemption from § 121.311(b) of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow your son, who is over two years old, to 

be held on the lap(s) of his family members rather than being in an individual seat with a 

seatbelt or in an approved child restraint device while traveling on an air carrier certificated 

under part 121 during all phases of flight. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because this is not a precedent-setting petition, and any delay in acting 

on this petition would be detrimental to your son. 

The FAA issued a denial of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In dDenial of Exemption No. 6479 (copy enclosed), the 

FAA found that an exemption would not provide a level of safety that is equivalent to the 

regulations. The FAA also recognized that children are safer in an approved child restraint 

device. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that they do not differ 

materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed denial of exemption. In 

addition, I have determined that the reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclosed 
2 

exemption also apply to the situation you present. I also find that a grant of exemption would 

not be in the public interest. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they don’t differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed Denial 

of Exemption No. 6479; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclosed Denial of Exemption No. 6479 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption wouldn’t be in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby deny your petition for an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b). 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James Gardner 

Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards 

 Service 

Enclosure
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
            --------------------------------------------------------


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-111713, as amended, 333-120414, 333-120415, 333-120416,
333-120417 and 333-120418) previously filed by Outdoor Channel Holdings, Inc. of
our report, dated February 25, 2005, except for Note 16 as to which the date is
May 9, 2005, on the consolidated financial statements of Outdoor Channel
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, which report appears
in this annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004.

/s/ J. H. COHN LLP

San Diego, CA
May 10, 2005


                                       90
#### (A) Elizabeth A. Bronner, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, M. Dorothy Bronner, Appellant, v. County of Onondaga, Respondent. Andrew J. Bronner, Appellant, v. County of Onondaga, Respondent. (B) Georgine B. Hairston, Respondent, v. Richard Hairston, Appellant, et al., Defendants. (C) William C. *McCombs Co.,*Inc., Respondent, v. Kazmiera Brodowczynski, Also Known as Katherine Brodie, et al., Appellants. (D) In the Matter of Michael Sepielli et al., Appellants, v. Herman Aube et al., Constituting the Town Board of the Town of Niagara, et al., Respondents. (E) Village of New Hartford, Respondent, v. George Winn, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[In each action] Motion granted and appeal dismissed.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9385 

To amend the Social Security Act to place limitations on recovery of 

overpayments under titles II and XVI. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 20, 2024 

Mr. CAREY (for himself and Mrs. SYKES) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Social Security Act to place limitations on 

recovery of overpayments under titles II and XVI. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Americans 

5 from Social Security Clawbacks Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON RECOVERY OF OVERPAYMENTS. 

7 (a) TITLE II AMENDMENT.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 204(a)(1)(A) of the 

9 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 404(a)(1)(A)) is 

10 amended— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9385 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘With respect’’ and insert2 ing ‘‘(i) With respect’’; and 

3 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(ii) In any case in which the Commissioner 

5 finds that more than the correct amount of payment 

6 has been made to a person, recovery from the person 

7 may not be made if— 

8 ‘‘(I) the overpayment occurred more than 

9 3 years before the date of the finding; and 

10 ‘‘(II) the overpayment was a result of error 

11 on the part of the Commissioner. 

12 ‘‘(iii) Clause (ii) shall not apply to a person if 

13 the Commissioner determines that the person has 

14 ever committed fraud or similar fault with respect to 

15 the program under this title.’’. 

16 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

17 204(a)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 404(a)(2)) is 

18 amended by striking ‘‘Notwithstanding’’ and insert19 ing ‘‘Subject to clauses (ii) and (iii) of paragraph 

20 (1)(A), but notwithstanding’’. 

21 (b) TITLE XVI AMENDMENTS.— 

22 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1631(b)(1) of such 

23 Act (42 U.S.C. 1383(b)(1)) is amended by adding at 

24 the end the following: 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 9385 IH

1 ‘‘(C)(i) In any case in which the Commissioner finds 

2 that more than the correct amount of payment has been 

3 made to a person, recovery from the person may not be 

4 made if— 

5 ‘‘(I) the overpayment occurred more than 3 

6 years before the date of the finding; and 

7 ‘‘(II) the overpayment was a result of error on 

8 the part of the Commissioner. 

9 ‘‘(ii) Clause (i) shall not apply to a person if the Com10 missioner determines that the person has ever committed 

11 fraud or similar fault with respect to the program under 

12 this title.’’. 

13 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

14 1631(b)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1383(b)(2)) is 

15 amended by striking ‘‘Notwithstanding’’ and insert16 ing ‘‘Subject to paragraph (1)(C), but notwith17 standing’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
### §1423i. Approval of bills

Every bill passed by the legislature shall, before it becomes a law, be entered upon the journal and presented to the Governor. If he approves it, he shall sign it, but if not he shall, except as hereinafter provided, return it, with his objections, to the legislature within ten days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him. If he does not return it within such period, it shall be a law in like manner as if he had signed it, unless the legislature by adjournment prevents its return, in which case it shall be a law if signed by the Governor within thirty days after it shall have been presented to him; otherwise it shall not be a law. When a bill is returned by the Governor to the legislature with his objections, the legislature shall enter his objections at large on its journal and, upon motion of a member of the legislature, proceed to reconsider the bill. If, after such reconsideration, two-thirds of all the members of the legislature pass the bill, it shall be a law. If any bill presented to the Governor contains several items of appropriation of money, he may object to one or more of such items, or any part or parts, portion or portions thereof, while approving the other items, parts, or portions of the bill. In such a case he shall append to the bill at the time of signing it, a statement of the items, or parts or portions thereof, to which he objects, and the items, or parts or portions thereof, so objected to shall not take effect. All laws enacted by the legislature shall be reported by the Governor to the head of the department or agency designated by the President under section 1421a of this title. The Congress of the United States reserves the power and authority to annul the same.

(Aug. 1, 1950, ch. 512, §19, 64 Stat. 389; Pub. L. 90–497, §8, Sept. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 847; Pub. L. 93–608, §1(14), Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1969.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1975—Pub. L. 93–608 struck out requirement that reports be transmitted to Congress by the Secretary concerned.

1968—Pub. L. 90–497, §8(a), struck out President's authority to veto territorial legislation referred by the Governor after such legislation had been passed by the legislature over the Governor's veto.

Pub. L. 90–497, §8(b), struck out provision that, if Congress did not annul laws passed by the legislature and reported to Congress within one year of the date of its receipt by Congress, such laws were deemed to have been approved by Congress.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1968 Amendment

Pub. L. 90–497, §8(b), Sept. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 847, provided that the amendment made by that section is effective on the date of enactment of Pub. L. 90–497, which was approved Sept. 11, 1968.

Amendment by Pub. L. 90–497 necessary to authorize the holding of an election for Governor and Lieutenant Governor on Nov. 3, 1970, effective Jan. 1, 1970, and all other amendments unless otherwise provided effective Jan. 4, 1971, see section 13 of Pub. L. 90–497, set out as a note under section 1422 of this title.
EX-10.3


   

  Exhibit 10.3

  AMENDMENT TO 

  RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT 

  UNDER THE MEMBERSHIP COLLECTIVE GROUP, INC. 

  2021 EQUITY AND INCENTIVE PLAN

   

  WHEREAS, Membership Collective Group, Inc. (the “Company”) previously made a grant of restricted stock units to the undersigned (the “Holder”) pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Membership Collective Group, Inc. 2021 Equity and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), and the terms of an award agreement,  dated as of 19 July 2021 with respect to 401,845 of Stock (the “Award Agreement”); 

  WHEREAS, the Company and the Holder desire to amend the Award Agreement in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Amendment (this “Amendment”).

  NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Award Agreement is hereby amended as follows, effective as of 28 September 2022:

   

   

  1.Section 3 of the Award Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:


   

  Restriction Period and Vesting.   The Company and the Holder agree that 100,461 of Stock out of the total Award of 401,845 has vested as at the date of this Amendment.  Except as otherwise provided in the Plan or in section 2.7 of the Settlement Agreement, by and between Holder and Soho House UK Limited, dated 28 September 2022, the remaining Award of 301,384 shall vest in four equal installments of 75,346 on each of 1 October 2022, 1 November 2022, 1 January 2023 and 1 April 2023 (each, a “Vesting Date”).  The period of time from the date of this Amendment prior to the vesting shall be referred to herein as the “Restriction Period.”  The Company and the Holder agree that for the avoidance of doubt, the vesting of the Award in accordance with this Section 3 is not conditional on the employment or engagement of the Holder by the Company, any Subsidiary or any Affiliate and in the event that this conflicts with the provisions of Plan, this Section 3 shall control.

   

     

  2.Except as set forth in this Amendment, the terms and conditions of the Award Agreement as in effect immediately prior to the date hereof shall remain in full force and effect.


   

  [Signature Page Follows]

   

   

   

   

   

   IF " DOCVARIABLE "SWDocIDLocation" " = "1" " DOCPROPERTY "SWDocID" 4857-9680-4404v.1" "" 

  

   

  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date set forth above.

   

   

  MEMBERSHIP COLLECTIVE GROUP, INC. 

   

   

   

   

  By: /s/ Andrew Carnie

   

  Print Name: Andrew Carnie

   

   

  HOLDER

   

   

   

   

   

  Signature: /s/ Martin Kuczmarski  

   

  Print Name: Martin Kuczmarski 

   

   IF " DOCVARIABLE "SWDocIDLocation" " = "1" " DOCPROPERTY "SWDocID" 4857-9680-4404v.1" ""
<PAGE>
[Sbs Tower LOGO]                                                    Exhibit 10.1



August 30, 2002
William B. Tanner Jr.
4180 Lybyer Ave.
Coconut Grove, FL 33133-6154


Dear William B. Tanner Jr.:

Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.
1999 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan"), you have been granted a Nonqualified Stock
Option, to purchase 15,000 shares (the "Option") of Class A common stock as
outlined below.


             Granted To:   William B. Tanner Jr.
                           SSN ###-##-####

           Granted Date:   August 31, 2002

         Option Granted:   15,000

 Option Price per Share:   $7.07      Total Cost to Exercise:   $106,050.00

        Expiration Date:   August 31, 2007, unless terminated earlier.

       Vesting Schedule:   100% immediately as follows:

                           15,000 on 08/31/2002

        Transferability:   Not transferable except in accordance with the Plan.


                                            Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.


                                            By: /s/ Raul Alarcon, Jr.
                                                -------------------------------

By my signature below, I hereby acknowledge receipt of this Option granted on
the date shown above, which has been issued to me under the terms and
conditions of the Plan. I further acknowledge receipt of a copy of the Plan
and agree to conform to all of the terms and conditions of the Option and the
Plan.


Signature:  /s/ William B. Tanner               Date:   9/4/02
            ----------------------------             --------------
             William B. Tanner Jr.

                                  [LETTERHEAD]
### **CHAPTER 475—NOISE**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—NOISE ABATEMENT

Sec.
47501.
Definitions.
47502.
Noise measurement and exposure systems and identifying land use compatible with noise exposure.
47503.
Noise exposure maps.
47504.
Noise compatibility programs.
47505.
Airport noise compatibility planning grants.
47506.
Limitations on recovering damages for noise.
47507.
Nonadmissibility of noise exposure map and related information as evidence.
47508.
Noise standards for air carriers and foreign air carriers providing foreign air transportation.
47509.
Research program on quiet aircraft technology for propeller and rotor driven aircraft.
47510.
Tradeoff allowance.
47511.
CLEEN engine and airframe technology partnership.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—NATIONAL AVIATION NOISE POLICY

47521.
Findings.
47522.
Definitions.
47523.
National aviation noise policy.
47524.
Airport noise and access restriction review program.
47525.
Decision about airport noise and access restrictions on certain stage 2 aircraft.
47526.
Limitations for noncomplying airport noise and access restrictions.
47527.
Liability of the United States Government for noise damages.
47528.
Prohibition on operating certain aircraft not complying with stage 3 noise levels.
47529.
Nonaddition rule.
47530.
Nonapplication of sections 47528(a)–(d) and 47529 to aircraft outside the 48 contiguous States.
47531.
Penalties.
47532.
Judicial review.
47533.
Relationship to other laws.
47534.
Prohibition on operating certain aircraft weighing 75,000 pounds or less not complying with stage 3 noise levels.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title VII, §743(b), Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3413, added item 47511.

**2012**—Pub. L. 112–95, title V, §506(b)(3), Feb. 14, 2012, 126 Stat. 106, which directed amendment of the analysis for subchapter II of this chapter by substituting "Penalties" for "Penalties for violating sections 47528–47530" in item 47531 and by adding item 47534, was executed to the analysis for this chapter to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–429, §6(72)(B), Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4388, added item 47510.

Pub. L. 103–305, title III, §308(b), Aug. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 1594, added item 47509.
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Ronald Rumore

*Christopher M. Cosgrove,*assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

*Marjorie Allen Dauster,*deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided October 22, 1992

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 28 Conn. App. 402, is denied.

Berdon, J.,

dissenting. I would grant the defendant’s petition for certification.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3503

To ensure privacy for e-mail communications. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2005

Mr. CANNON (for himself and Mr. INSLEE) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To ensure privacy for e-mail communications.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘E-Mail Privacy Act 

5 of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF THE DEFINITION OF INTER7 CEPT. 

8 Section 2510(4) of title 18, United States Code, is 

9 amended by striking ‘‘through the use of any electronic, 

10 mechanical, or other device.’’ and inserting ‘‘contempora11 neous with transit, or on an ongoing basis during transit, 

12 through the use of any electronic, mechanical, or other de-
2

•HR 3503 IH 

1 vice or process, notwithstanding that the communication 

2 may simultaneously be in electronic storage;’’.

Æ
#### Jeri L. Billington *v.*Randall J. Billington

*Randall J. Billington,*pro se, in support of the petition.

*Gerald L. Garlick,*in opposition.

Decided October 22, 1992

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 466, is denied.
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 
18 U.S.C. §1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of White Knight Resources Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended
June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Annual Report), I, John M. Leask, Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The
Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(s) |  | The
information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Dated:     October 20, 2006 | Signed:  John M. Leask
________________________________________
John M. Leask
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 
18 U.S.C. §1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of White Knight Resources Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended
June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Annual Report), I, Megan Cameron-Jones, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate
Secretary and a Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The
Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(s) |  | The
information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Dated:     October 20, 2006 | Signed:  Megan Cameron-Jones
________________________________________
Megan Cameron-Jones
Chief Financial Officer, Corporate 
Secretary and Director
|--------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,395
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,886
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         36
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,955
<PP&E>                                         233,455
<DEPRECIATION>                                  75,476
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 181,585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,018
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,204
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   181,585
<SALES>                                         45,619
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,619
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,868
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,252
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,874
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (23,020)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (23,020)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,020)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>