Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 237 / Wednesday, December 9, 2020 / Notices 79165 

1See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Final Determination of No Shipments; 2017–2018, 

85 FR 62275 (October 2, 2020) (Final Results), and 

accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum 

(IDM). 

2See LERRI’s Letter, ‘‘LONGi Request for 

Correction of Clerical Error in the Final Results 

including Customs Instructions,’’ dated September 

30, 2020. 

3As noted in the Final Results, we are treating 

Trina Solar Co., Ltd.; Trina Solar (Changzhou) 

Science and Technology Co., Ltd.; Yancheng Trina 

Guoneng Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd 

(formerly, Yancheng Trina Solar Energy Technology 

Co., Ltd.); Changzhou Trina Solar Yabang Energy 

Co., Ltd.; Turpan Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.; 

Hubei Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.; Trina Solar 

(Hefei) Science and Technology Co., Ltd.; and 

Changzhou Trina Hezhong Photoelectric Co., Ltd. 

(collectively Trina) as a single entity. 

4As noted in the Final Results, we are treating 

Risen Energy Co., Ltd.; Risen (Wuhai) New Energy 

Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang Twinsel Electronic Technology 

Co., Ltd.; Risen (Luoyang) New Energy Co., Ltd.; 

Jiujiang Shengchao Xinye Technology Co., Ltd.; 

Jiujiang Shengzhao Xinye Trade Co., Ltd. Ruichang 

Branch, and Risen Energy (HongKong) Co., Ltd. 

(collectively Risen) as a single entity. 

Barcode. 

5See Risen’s Letter, ‘‘Risen Ministerial Error 

Comments,’’ dated October 6, 2020; see also Trina’s 

Letter, ‘‘Ministerial Error Allegation,’’ dated 

October 6, 2020. 

6See Petitioner’s Letter ‘‘Response to Ministerial 

Error Allegations,’’ dated October 12, 2020. 

Comment 9: The Benchmark for Ocean 

Freight 

Comment 10: Commerce’s Use of ‘‘Zeroing’’ 

in Benefit Calculations 

Comment 11: Whether Commerce Should 

Correct Errors to Sales Denominators and 

the Attribution of Subsidies 

XII. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

Non-Selected Companies Under Review 

1. Anji DaSol Solar Energy Science & 

Technology Co., Ltd. 

2. Baoding Jiasheng Photovoltaic Technology 

Co., Ltd. 

3. Baoding Tianwei Yingli New Energy 

Resources Co., Ltd. 

4. Beijing Tianneng Yingli New Energy 

Resources Co., Ltd. 

5. BYD (Shangluo) Industrial Co., Ltd. 

6. Canadian Solar (USA) Inc. 

7. Canadian Solar Inc. 

8. Canadian Solar International Ltd. 

9. Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Changshu) 

Inc. 

10. Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Luoyang) 

Inc. 

11. Changzhou Trina Solar Yabang Energy 

Co., Ltd. 

12. CSI Cells Co., Ltd. 

13. CSI–GCL Solar Manufacturing 

(Yancheng) Co., Ltd. 

14. De-Tech Trading Limited HK 

15. Dongguan Sunworth Solar Energy Co., 

Ltd. 

16. Eoplly New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. 

17. ERA Solar Co., Ltd. 

18. ET Solar Energy Limited 

19. Hainan Yingli New Energy Resources Co., 

Ltd. 

20. Hangzhou Sunny Energy Science and 

Technology Co., Ltd. 

21. Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics Co., 

Ltd. 

22. Hengshui Yingli New Energy Resources 

Co., Ltd. 

23. Hubei Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. 

24. JA Technology Yangzhou Co., Ltd. 

25. Jiangsu High Hope Int’l Group 

26. Jiawei Solarchina (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. 

27. Jiawei Solarchina Co., Ltd. 

28. Jinko Solar (U.S.) Inc. 

29. Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. 

30. Jinko Solar Import and Export Co., Ltd. 

31. Jinko Solar International Limited 

32. LERRI Solar Technology Co., Ltd. 

33. Lightway Green New Energy Co., Ltd. 

34. Lixian Yingli New Energy Resources Co., 

Ltd. 

35. Luoyang Suntech Power Co., Ltd. 

36. Nice Sun PV Co., Ltd. 

37. Ningbo ETDZ Holdings, Ltd. 

38. Ningbo Qixin Solar Electrical Appliance 

Co., Ltd. 

39. Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd. 

40. Shenzhen Sungold Solar Co., Ltd. 

41. Shenzhen Yingli New Energy Resources 

Co., Ltd. 

42. Sumec Hardware & Tools Co., Ltd. 

43. Sunpreme Solar Technology (Jiaxing) Co., 

Ltd. 

44. Systemes Versilis, Inc. 

45. Taizhou BD Trade Co., Ltd. 

46. TenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 

47. Tianjin Yingli New Energy Resources Co., 

Ltd. 

48. Tianneng Yingli New Energy Resources 

Co., Ltd. 

49. Toenergy Technology Hangzhou Co., Ltd. 

50. Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science & 

Technology Co., Ltd. 

51. Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. (formerly 

known as Changzhou Trina Solar Energy 

Co., Ltd.) 

52. Turpan Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. 

53. Wuxi Suntech Power Co., Ltd. 

54. Wuxi Tianran Photovoltaic Co., Ltd. 

55. Yancheng Trina Solar Energy Technology 

Co., Ltd. 

56. Yingli Energy (China) Co., Ltd. 

57. Yingli Green Energy Holding Company 

Limited 

58. Yingli Green Energy International 

Trading Company Limited 

59. Zhejiang ERA Solar Technology Co., Ltd. 

60. Zhejiang Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2020–27037 Filed 12–8–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–979] 

Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled Into 

Modules, From the People’s Republic 

of China: Notice of Correction to the 

Final Results of the 2017–2018 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) is correcting its notice of 

the final results of the sixth 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on 

crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, 

whether or not assembled into modules 

(solar cells), from the People’s Republic 

of China (China). The period of review 

(POR) is December 1, 2017 through 

November 30, 2018. 

DATES: Applicable December 9, 2020. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff 

Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

IV, Enforcement & Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2769. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 2, 2020, Commerce 

published the final results of the 2017– 

2018 administrative review of the AD 

order on solar cells from China in the 

Federal Register.1 On September 30, 

2020, one company claiming that it had 

no shipments under review contended 

that in the Final Results Commerce 

incorrectly identified it as ‘‘LERRI Solar 

Technology Co., Ltd’’ (LERRI) and that 

its correct name is ‘‘LONGi Solar 

Technology Co. Ltd. (a.k.a. LERRI Solar 

Technology Co., Ltd.).’’ 2 On October 6, 

2020, Trina 3 and Risen 4 submitted 

timely ministerial error comments.5

Specifically, Trina and Risen allege that 

we applied the incorrect amount in 

valuing their tempered glass inputs. 

Risen also alleges that we incorrectly 

valued its junction box inputs and 

incorrectly calculated the surrogate 

financial ratios. On October 12, 2020, 

SunPower Manufacturing Oregon LLC 

(the petitioner) submitted a timely 

rebuttal proposing an alternative to 

Trina and Risen’s suggest valuation of 

tempered glass, arguing that there was 

no ministerial error in the valuation of 

Risen junction boxes, and asserting that 

labor was omitted from the calculation 

of surrogate financial ratios.6

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

is crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, 

and modules, laminates, and panels, 

consisting of crystalline silicon 

photovoltaic cells, whether or not 

partially or fully assembled into other 

products, including, but not limited to, 

modules, laminates, panels and building 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
79166 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 237 / Wednesday, December 9, 2020 / Notices 

7For a complete description of the scope of the 

order, see Final Results IDM. 8See Memorandum, ‘‘Allegations of Ministerial 

Errors in the Final Results,’’ dated concurrently 

with this notice. 

9See Final Results IDM at Comment 3. 

10See Final Results IDM at Comment 8. 

11See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR 

9297 (March 14, 2019). 

12See Final Results, 85 at 62276. 

13This rate is based on the rates for the 

respondents that were selected for individual 

review, excluding rates that are zero, de minimis, 

or based entirely on facts available. See section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act. See Memorandum, 

‘‘Amended Calculation of the Cash Deposit Rate for 

Non-Reviewed Companies,’’ dated concurrently 

with this notice. 

integrated materials.7 Merchandise 

covered by the order is classifiable 

under subheading 8501.61.0000, 

8507.20.80, 8541.40.6020, 8541.40.6030, 

and 8501.31.8000 of the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS). Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, our 

written description of the scope of the 

order is dispositive. 

Ministerial Errors 

Section 351.224(e) of Commerce’s 

regulations provides that Commerce 

will analyze any comments received 

and, if appropriate, correct any 

ministerial error by amending the final 

determination or the final results of the 

review. Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 

CFR 351.224(f) define a ‘‘ministerial 

error’’ as an error ‘‘in addition, 

subtraction, or other arithmetic 

function, clerical error resulting from 

inaccurate copying, duplication, or the 

like, and any other similar type of 

unintentional error which the Secretary 

considers ministerial.’’ 

We analyzed the ministerial error 

comments and determined, in 

accordance with section 751(h) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e) and (f), that 

we made the following ministerial 

errors: 8

(1) In the Final Results, we stated our 

intention to value tempered glass using 

Romanian imports of HTS 7007.19.80.9

However, we incorrectly applied a value 

of 2.19 euros per kilogram (kg). Record 

evidence demonstrates the average unit 

value of Romanian imports of HTS 

7007.19.80 to be 1.87 euros per kg, and 

we have corrected for this error in our 

calculation by valuing tempered glass 

using the 1.87 euros per kg amount. 

(2) As accurately noted by Risen, we 

determined in the Final Results that 

‘‘Malaysian HTS 8544.42.9400 and HTS 

8544.60.1100 most closely correspond 

with the various junction boxes used by 

Risen.’’ 10 However, we stated that data 

for Malaysian imports of HTS 

8544.42.9400 were not on the record 

and so it was not possible to average the 

values under Malaysian HTS 

8544.42.9400 with the values under 

Malaysian HTS 8544.60.1100. We thus 

relied solely on Malaysian imports of 

HTS 8544.60.1100 to value Risen’s 

junction box consumption. However, 

data for Malaysian imports of HTS 

8544.42.9400 were in fact on the record 

and so we have corrected this error by 

relying on an simple average of 

Malaysian imports of HTS 8544.42.9400 

and HTS 8544.60.1100 to value Risen’s 

consumption of junction boxes. 

(3) We failed to identify that the Risen 

collapsed entity included Risen Energy 

(Changzhou) Co., Ltd. in the rate section 

of the Final Results. We have corrected 

for this by adding Risen Energy 

(Changzhou) Co., Ltd. to the Risen 

collapsed entity in the rate section. 

(4) We failed to include, in the 

calculation of Trina’s normal value, the 

cost of the silver paste consumed by 

Trina. We have corrected for this error 

by including this cost in the calculation 

of Trina’s normal value. 

We found that we did not commit a 

ministerial error by not including 

‘‘LONGi Solar Technology Co. Ltd.’’ in 

the name that we used to identify 

LERRI. Because a review was requested 

and initiated under the name LERRI,11

our no shipments determination applies 

with respect to that name and we used 

that name in the Final Results. Thus, 

our omission of the other company 

name was correct. 

We also disagree with Risen’s 

contention that we committed a 

ministerial error by incorrectly 

classifying certain expenses in 

calculating the surrogate financial 

ratios. Risen’s argument is 

methodological in nature. 

Separate Rates 

In the Final Results we found that 

Trina, Risen, and 16 other companies/ 

company groups were eligible for a 

separate rate. Commerce assigned a 

dumping margin to the separate rate 

companies that it did not individually 

examine, but which demonstrated their 

eligibility for a separate rate, based on 

the mandatory respondents’ dumping 

margins.12 Because Trina’s and Risen’s 

margins have changed due to the 

correction of ministerial errors, we have 

recalculated the rate assigned to the 

non-individually examined separate rate 

companies.13

Amended Final Results of Review 

As a result of correcting the four 

ministerial errors discussed above, we 

determine that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the 

POR: 

Producers/exporters 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Trina Solar Co., Ltd./Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science and Technology Co., Ltd./Yancheng Trina Guoneng Photovoltaic Technology 

Co., Ltd./Changzhou Trina Solar Yabang Energy Co., Ltd./Turpan Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd./Hubei Trina Solar Energy Co., 

Ltd./Trina Solar (Hefei) Science and Technology Co., Ltd./Changzhou Trina Hezhong Photoelectric Co., Ltd .................................. 92.52 

Risen Energy Co. Ltd./Risen (Wuhai) New Energy Co., Ltd./Zhejiang Twinsel Electronic Technology Co., Ltd./Risen (Luoyang) New 

Energy Co., Ltd./Jiujiang Shengchao Xinye Technology Co., Ltd./Jiujiang Shengzhao Xinye Trade Co., Ltd./Ruichang Branch, 

Risen Energy (HongKong) Co., Ltd./Risen Energy (Changzhou) Co., Ltd ........................................................................................... 100.79 

Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following Companies: 

Anji DaSol Solar Energy Science & Technology Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................ 95.50 

Canadian Solar International Limited/Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Changshu), Inc./Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Luoyang) Inc./

CSI Cells Co., Ltd./CSI–GCL Solar Manufacturing (YanCheng) Co., Ltd./CSI Solar Power (China) Inc. (Canadian Solar) ............... 95.50 

JA Solar Technology Yangzhou Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................................. 95.50 

Jiawei Solarchina Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................................................................... 95.50 

JingAo Solar Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................................................ 95.50 

Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. (Jinko) ...................................................................................................................................................................... 95.50 

Jinko Solar Import and Export Co., Ltd. (Jinko I&E) ................................................................................................................................. 95.50 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 237 / Wednesday, December 9, 2020 / Notices 79167 

14See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963, 65969–70 (November 4, 2013). 

15See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Final Determination of No Shipments; 2015–2016, 

83 FR 35616 (July 27, 2018). 

16See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

17 Id. 

18See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 

(February 14, 2012). 

19See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694 (October 24, 2011), for a full discussion 

of this practice. 

Producers/exporters 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Jinko Solar International Limited (Jinko Int’l) ............................................................................................................................................ 95.50 

Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................................................. 95.50 

Shanghai JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................... 95.50 

Shenzhen Portable Electronic Technology Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................. 95.50 

Shenzhen Sungold Solar Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................................. 95.50 

Wuxi Tianran Photovoltaic Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................................................... 95.50 

Yingli Energy (China) Company Limited/Baoding Tianwei Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./Tianjin Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./Hengshui Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./Lixian Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./Baoding 

Jiasheng Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd./Beijing Tianneng Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./Hainan Yingli New Energy 

Resources Co., Ltd./Shenzhen Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd ............................................................................................... 95.50 

Zhejiang Jinko Solar Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................................................... 95.50 

Zhejiang Sunflower Light Energy Science & Technology Limited Liability Company .............................................................................. 95.50 

Commerce’s policy regarding 

conditional review of the China-wide 

entity applies to this administrative 

review.14 Under this policy, the Chinawide entity will not be under review 

unless a party specifically requests, or 

Commerce self-initiates, a review of the 

entity. Because no party requested a 

review of the China-wide entity, and we 

did not self-initiate a review of the 

entity, the entity is not under review, 

and the entity’s dumping margin (i.e., 

238.95 percent) is not subject to change 

as a result of this review.15

Assessment 

We will determine, and U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) shall 

assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review. We intend to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP 15 days after the 

publication date of these amended final 

results of review. In accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(b)(1), we are calculating 

importer- or customer-specific 

assessment rates for the merchandise 

subject to this review. For any 

individually examined respondent 

whose weighted-average dumping 

margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 

percent), we will calculate importer- or 

customer-specific assessment rates for 

merchandise subject to this review. 

Where the respondent reported reliable 

entered values, we calculated importeror customer-specific ad valorem rates by 

aggregating the dumping margins 

calculated for all U.S. sales to the 

importer or customer and dividing this 

amount by the total entered value of the 

sales to the importer or customer.16

Where we calculated an importer- or 

customer-specific weighted-average 

dumping margin by dividing the total 

amount of dumping for reviewed sales 

to the importer or customer by the total 

sales quantity associated with those 

transactions, we will direct CBP to 

assess importer- or customer-specific 

assessment rates based on the resulting 

per-unit rates.17 Where an importer- or 

customer- specific ad valorem or perunit rate is greater than de minimis, we 

will instruct CBP to collect the 

appropriate duties at the time of 

liquidation. Where either the 

respondent’s weighted average dumping 

margin is zero or de minimis, or an 

importer or customer-specific ad 

valorem or per-unit rate is zero or de 

minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate appropriate entries without 

regard to antidumping duties.18

For merchandise whose sale/entry 

was not reported in the U.S. sales 

database submitted by an exporter 

individually examined during this 

review, but that entered under the case 

number of that exporter (i.e., at the 

individually-examined exporter’s cash 

deposit rate), we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate such entries at the China-wide 

rate. Additionally, if we determine that 

an exporter under review had no 

shipments of the subject merchandise, 

any suspended entries that entered 

under that exporter’s case number will 

be liquidated at the China-wide rate.19

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the amended final results 

of this administrative review for 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

from China entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the publication date of this notice in the 

Federal Register, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the 

exporters listed in the table in the 

‘‘Amended Final Results of Review’’ 

section above, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate listed for each exporter in the 

table, except if the rate is zero or de 

minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), then 

the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for 

previously investigated Chinese and 

non-Chinese exporters that received a 

separate rate in a prior segment of this 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the existing exporterspecific rate; (3) for all Chinese 

exporters of subject merchandise that 

have not been found to be entitled to a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate previously established for the 

China-wide entity (i.e., 238.95 percent); 

and (4) for all non-China exporters of 

subject merchandise which have not 

received their own rate, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate applicable to the 

Chinese exporter that supplied the nonChinese exporter. These deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Disclosure 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed for these amended final 

results within five days of publication of 

this notice in the Federal Register in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
79168 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 237 / Wednesday, December 9, 2020 / Notices 

1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review, 85 FR 47167 

(August 4, 2020). 

2 The petitioners are the Polyethylene Retail 

Carrier Bag Committee and its individual members, 

Hilex Poly Co., LLC and Superbag Corporation. 

3 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Polyethylene Retail 

Carrier Bags from the People’s Republic of China: 

Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated August 

31, 2020. 

4 See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 

63081 (October 6, 2020) (Initiation Notice). 

5 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Polyethylene Retail 

Carrier Bags from the People’s Republic of China: 

Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,’’ 

dated November 16,2020. 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return or destruction of APO 

materials, or conversion to judicial 

protective order, is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

These corrections to the final results 

and notice are issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a) and 

777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: November 2, 2020. 

Jeffrey I. Kessler, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2020–27030 Filed 12–8–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–886] 

Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From 

the People’s Republic of China: 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) is rescinding the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on 

polyethylene retail carrier bags (PRCBs) 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(China) covering the period of review 

(POR) August 1, 2019, through July 31, 

2020, based on the timely withdrawal of 

the request for review. 

DATES: Applicable December 9, 2020. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Christopher Williams, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office I, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–5166. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 4, 2020, Commerce 

published a notice of opportunity to 

request an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on PRCBs from 

China for the POR August 1, 2019, 

through July 31, 2020.1 On August 31, 

2020, the petitioners 2 timely requested 

an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order with respect to 

Dongguan Nozawa Plastics Products 

Co., Ltd. and United Power Packaging, 

Ltd. (collectively, Nozawa), and Crown 

Polyethylene Products (International) 

Ltd. (Crown).3 Commerce received no 

other requests for an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order. 

On October 6, 2020, pursuant to section 

751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i), we published in the 

Federal Register a notice of initiation of 

an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on PRCBs from 

China with respect to Nozawa and 

Crown (the respondents).4 On 

November 16, 2020, the petitioners 

timely withdrew their administrative 

review request for Nozawa and Crown.5

Rescission of Administrative Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if a party that requested a review 

withdraws the request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of notice of 

initiation of the requested review. The 

petitioners withdrew their request for 

review within 90 days of the publication 

date of the Initiation Notice. No other 

parties requested an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order. 

Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping order on PRCBs from 

China for the period August 1, 2019, 

through July 31, 2020, in its entirety. 

Assessment 

Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) to assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of PRCBs from China during the 

POR at rates equal to the cash deposit 

rate of estimated antidumping duties 

required at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends 

to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions to CBP 15 days after 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of doubled antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: December 4, 2020. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2020–27026 Filed 12–8–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES