alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE UNITED BUILDING

77 WEST WACKER DRIVE

CHICAGO, IL60601

DAN WEISS

MANAGING DIRECTOR -INTERNATIONALAFFAIRSAND REGULATORY 

PHONE/FAX: (312) 997-7573

DAN.WEISS@UNITED.COM

September 11, 2012

Mr. Paul L. Gretch, Director

Office of International Aviation

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: U.S.-Russia Third-Country Code-share Partner/

Intermediate Point and Code-share Notice of United

Dockets DOT-OST-2008-0283 and -OST-2000-6803 

Dear Mr. Gretch:

Consistent with Department requirements, United1notifies the Department that it will code share 

with Austrian Airlines for transportation between the United States and Russia. Given that 

United has recently suspended its direct Moscow services, United believes it is important to 

expand its codeshare to/from Russia in order to provide alternative travel options to consumers in 

the U.S.–Russia market. United will code share on Austrian’s daily service between Vienna and 

Moscow and between Vienna and St. Petersburg for U.S.-Russia traffic that connects at the 

Vienna gateway. United’s planned U.S.-Russia third-country code share with Austrian is within 

the parameters of the July 22, 2008 U.S.-Russia Agreement. In addition, United already holds 

the requisite underlying authority to code share with Austrian to Moscow and St. Petersburg via 

Vienna.2

 

1 Common names are used for airlines.

2

See, Order 2011-3-14; and Department Action dated March 22, 2000 in Docket DOT-OST-2000-6803 

(United/Austrian code share), as amended, and Notice of Action Taken dated March 3, 2005 (United/Austrian 

blanket exemption) and February 17, 2011 (renewal granted) in Docket DOT-OST-2004-19148. 

Sincerely,

Dan Weiss

Managing Director, International & Regulatory 

Affairs

UNITED AIR LINES, INC. 

cc: Robert Finamore

Esta Rosenberg

Mary Street

Brian Hedberg

Arthur J. Molins
THE UNITED BUILDING

77 WEST WACKER DRIVE

CHICAGO, IL60601

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this date served a copy of the foregoing document on all 

persons named below by causing a copy to be sent via email:

francis.heil@aa.com

robert.wirick@aa.com

rsilverberg@sgbdc.com (ABX/ Air Transport Intl.)

stephen.lachter@lachterlaw.com (ASTAR)

rpommer@atlasair.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

charters@evergreenairlines.com (Evergreen)

cefelts@fedex.com

anbird@fedex.com

nssparks@fedex.com

matwood@cozen.com (Kalitta)

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com

anita.mosner@hklaw.com (UPS)

jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com (UPS)

howard.kass@usairways.com

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com

mlbenge@zsrlaw.com (World)

william.stallings@usdoj.gov

dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil

john.allen@faa.gov

Annalei Avanceña 

International Regulatory Advisor

September 11, 2012
### §24322. Rolling stock purchases

(a) In General.—Prior to entering into any contract in excess of $100,000,000 for rolling stock and locomotive procurements Amtrak shall submit a business case analysis to the Secretary of Transportation, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives, on the utility of such procurements.

(b) Contents.—The business case analysis shall—

(1) include a cost and benefit comparison that describes the total lifecycle costs and the anticipated benefits related to revenue, operational efficiency, reliability, and other factors;

(2) set forth the total payments by fiscal year;

(3) identify the specific source and amounts of funding for each payment, including Federal funds, State funds, Amtrak profits, Federal, State, or private loans or loan guarantees, and other funding;

(4) include an explanation of whether any payment under the contract will increase Amtrak's funding request in its general and legislative annual report required under section 24315(b) in a particular fiscal year; and

(5) describe how Amtrak will adjust the procurement if future funding is not available.

(c) Rule of Construction.—Nothing in this section shall be construed as requiring Amtrak to disclose confidential information regarding a potential vendor's proposed pricing or other sensitive business information prior to contract execution or prohibiting Amtrak from entering into a contract after submission of a business case analysis under subsection (a).

(Added Pub. L. 114–94, div. A, title XI, §11208(a), Dec. 4, 2015, 129 Stat. 1639.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 2015, see section 1003 of Pub. L. 114–94, set out as an Effective Date of 2015 Amendment note under section 5313 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
### §211. Contracts of carriers; filing with Commission

(a) Every carrier subject to this chapter shall file with the Commission copies of all contracts, agreements, or arrangements with other carriers, or with common carriers not subject to the provisions of this chapter, in relation to any traffic affected by the provisions of this chapter to which it may be a party.

(b) The Commission shall have authority to require the filing of any other contracts of any carrier, and shall also have authority to exempt any carrier from submitting copies of such minor contracts as the Commission may determine.

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title II, §211, 48 Stat. 1073.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this Act", meaning act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, 48 Stat. 1064, known as the Communications Act of 1934, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 609 of this title and Tables.
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

54) ll-K- (B) -42 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:49 AM Sheet 54 of 325 
P.2 

A-8 

II-K-(B)-42 

EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES. 

Letter from T. Hogan, EEA to R. Short, EPA:SASD. 

July 8, 1980. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(B)-42
§ 56.20003 Housekeeping. At all mining operations— ( a ) Workplaces, passageways, storerooms, and service rooms shall be kept clean and orderly;
( b ) The floor of every workplace shall be maintained in a clean and, so far as possible, dry condition. Where wet processes are used, drainage shall be maintained, and false floors, platforms, mats, or other dry standing places shall be provided where practicable; and
( c ) Every floor, working place, and passageway shall be kept free from protruding nails, splinters, holes, or loose boards, as practicable.
Exhibit 10.70

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

The following Amendment No. 1 dated as of December 18, 2009 (this Amendment) to the Employment
Agreement dated as of October 27, 2007 (the Agreement) sets forth the terms of the agreement between Philip Cross and DreamWorks Animation SKG, Inc. with respect to the matters set forth herein.

In consideration of the mutual covenants, representations, warranties and agreements set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:

1. Section 1 of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following language:

1. Term. The term of your employment hereunder commenced on September 7, 2007 (the Commencement
Date) and shall continue through and including February 28, 2010. This period shall hereinafter be referred to as the Employment Term.

2. Except as set forth herein, the Agreement remains unmodified and in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment No. 1 as of the date first set forth above.



DREAMWORKS ANIMATION SKG, INC.By:

/s/    Katherine KendrickTitle:

General Counsel




|                    |  | 
|------------------- |  | 
|                   
|/s/    Philip Cross
|PHILIP CROSS
U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)
Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA)

KIRUNDO
Original Map Courtesy of the UN Cartographic Section crs Sim
The boundaries and names shown and the designations eve Mm U SAI D
used on this map do not imply official endorsement or FROM THE AMERICAN PEORE
accepiance by the United Nations. inc tf
P teartund bm
RWANDA sinew
REPUBLIC OF
Gitobe TANZANIA
Mabay! el Gutininda
using Maransara MUYINGA
wu Gashoho crs Sim
CIBITOKE Awumbo * kiremba imc it
Bukinanyana ince
AF =
uganda Meret ane Gate wo
KAYANZA bu
BUBANZA | 2 "°°"? ve bunigo mm
DEMOCRATIC ces Bl iin ann a
REPUBLIC = Rango wy Be
OF THE sani fuk
cia
CONGO ‘idieanivva beset) tant Censor
exam
é , , 4 Gor Returnee Areas
. RUYIGI IRC
BUJUMBURA R.. purty ena crs 8M) °° UNICEF [#]
ces im MWARU oe Inc [=|
Concern $8 Kayobwe crs & AAH A
cve Bam ene Inc #A
inc ct [#] nh GEES
Inc A= []
7 fora ONGOING USG
N \ wpinga PROGRAMS IN BURUNDI
\ upg kayove # Ginaro = Administra
NATIONWIDE \ rutona | RUTANA mina’
utowy cit Wm Agriculture/Food Security
CRS BURURT X Air Transport
IARC Be : ; Be Construction
TI, Cre © Coordination
unicer 5 ~e[#] f © Emergency Relief Supplies
FAO ~e lim ee Maker © Gender-based Violence
OCHA ~ MAKAMBA W. TANZANIA || ER] Health
WFP x { Tearfund fe arc =[#] |] {& Information Dissemination
fi
who =e [| ’ Wort Retet inc As i Nutrition
Kibago NPA Refugee Assistance
WFP &
. A | | vsairvoroa — UNITED UNHCR A Shelter
Multiple USAID/EFP ) unicer [| | Training/Capacity Building
A REPUBLIC OF
UNHCR VoA &  Water/Sanitation
USAID/OTI TANZANIA 01
WFP A || staterpra wep Bt A 9114/05

Po,
#### Morris Silverstein’s Appeal from Probate

*Morris Silverstein,*pro se, in support of the petition.

Decided December 3, 1992

The petitioner Morris Silverstein’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 904, is denied.
### §31148. Certified motor carrier safety auditors

(a) In General.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this section, the Secretary of Transportation shall complete a rulemaking to improve training and provide for the certification of motor carrier safety auditors, including private contractors, to conduct safety inspection audits and reviews described in subsection (b).

(b) Certified Inspection Audit Requirement.—Not later than 1 year after completion of the rulemaking required by subsection (a), any safety inspection audit or review required by, or based on the authority of, this chapter or chapter 5, 313, or 315 of this title and performed after December 31, 2002, shall be conducted by—

(1) a motor carrier safety auditor certified under subsection (a); or

(2) a Federal or State employee who, on the date of the enactment of this section, was qualified to perform such an audit or review.

(c) Extension.—If the Secretary determines that subsection (b) cannot be implemented within the 1-year period established by that subsection and notifies the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives of the determination and the reasons therefor, the Secretary may extend the deadline for compliance with subsection (b) by not more than 12 months.

(d) Application With Other Authority.—The Secretary may not delegate the Secretary's authority to private contractors to issue ratings or operating authority, and nothing in this section authorizes any private contractor to issue ratings or operating authority.

(e) Oversight Responsibility.—The Secretary shall have authority over any motor carrier safety auditor certified under subsection (a), including the authority to decertify a motor carrier safety auditor.

(Added Pub. L. 106–159, title II, §211(a), Dec. 9, 1999, 113 Stat. 1765.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of the enactment of this section, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b)(2), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 106–159, which was approved Dec. 9, 1999.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Inspector Standards

Pub. L. 114–94, div. A, title V, §5205, Dec. 4, 2015, 129 Stat. 1537, provided that: "Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 4, 2015], the Administrator of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration shall revise the regulations under part 385 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, as necessary, to incorporate by reference the certification standards for roadside inspectors issued by the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance."
### §20132. Visible markers for rear cars

(a) General.—The Secretary of Transportation shall prescribe regulations and issue orders that may be necessary to require that—

(1) the rear car of each passenger and commuter train has at least one highly visible marker that is lighted during darkness and when weather conditions restrict clear visibility; and

(2) the rear car of each freight train has highly visible markers during darkness and when weather conditions restrict clear visibility.

(b) Preemption.—Notwithstanding section 20106 of this title, subsection (a) of this section does not prohibit a State from continuing in force a law, regulation, or order in effect on July 8, 1976, related to lighted markers on the rear car of a freight train except to the extent it would cause the car to be in violation of this section.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 873.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20132(a) | 45:431(g) (1st sentence cls. (2), (3)). | Oct. 16, 1970, Pub. L. 91–458, 84 Stat. 971, §202(g) (1st sentence cls. (2), (3), last sentence); added July 8, 1976, Pub. L. 94–348, §5(b), 90 Stat. 820. |
| 20132(b) | 45:431(g) (last sentence). | |

Section

In subsection (a), before clause (1), the words "within 180 days after July 8, 1976" are omitted as expired.
Aprende más en consumerfinance.gov/paying-for-college. 1 of 2 Oficina para la Protección

Financiera del Consumidor

Cosas que puede hacer

§ Compare opciones. No se sienta limitado a los 

bancos o cooperativas de crédito con cajeros 

automáticos cerca del campus.

§ Considere cuentas con servicios como depósitos 

remotos de cheques, aplicaciones móviles y pago 

de facturas en línea.

¿Tengo que registrarme con el banco en mi 

establecimiento educativo?

No. Los establecimientos educativos no pueden exigirle 

que use su banco.

Cosas que puede hacer

§ Haga preguntas. ¿Su banco hace cobros mensuales? 

¿Y los cargos de cajeros automáticos por fuera de la 

red, los cargos por usar su tarjeta de débito o 

los cargos por servicios como el pago de facturas 

en línea?

§ Investigue más cuando las cuentas se comercialicen 

como “gratis” o “fáciles”— muy pocas cuentas no 

cobran nada en absoluto.

¿Cuáles son los cargos por sobregiros?

Cuando usted gasta más dinero del que tiene en su 

cuenta, su banco probablemente le cobrará un cargo 

por sobregiro. Sea cauteloso. Los cargos pueden 

aumentar rápidamente.

PAGO DE ESTUDIOS SUPERIORES

Administre el dinero de 

sus estudios

Paso 1. Elija una cuenta

Trate de encontrar una cuenta con antelación, 

incluso antes de empezar a estudiar. Investigar 

ahora puede ahorrarle dinero en el futuro.

Paso 2. Evite cargos inesperados 

Saber si le cobrarán cargos y cuándo podría 

ahorrarle cientos de dólares en cargos cada año.
 Aprende más en consumerfinance.gov/paying-for-college. 2 of 2 Oficina para la Protección

Financiera del Consumidor

¿Qué es un desembolso de ayuda financiera?

Un desembolso de ayuda financiera es el dinero que 

queda después de que el establecimiento educativo 

saca el costo de la matrícula, los cargos y cualquier 

otro gasto de vivienda en el campus de su asignación 

de ayuda financiera. Normalmente usted tiene varias 

opciones para obtener ese dinero, incluido el depósito 

directo a una cuenta bancaria, a una tarjeta que también 

podría servirle de identificación estudiantil, mediante 

cheque o dinero en efectivo.

Paso 3. Regístrese para 

depósitos directos

Si está esperando dinero de su oficina de 

ayuda financiera, lo obtendrá a menudo más 

rápido mediante depósito directo que con 

un cheque impreso.
### §44503. Reducing nonessential expenditures

The Secretary of Transportation shall attempt to reduce the capital, operating, maintenance, and administrative costs of the national airport and airway system to the maximum extent practicable consistent with the highest degree of aviation safety. At least annually, the Secretary shall consult with and consider the recommendations of users of the system on ways to reduce nonessential expenditures of the United States Government for aviation. The Secretary shall give particular attention to a recommendation that may reduce, with no adverse effect on safety, future personnel requirements and costs to the Government required to be recovered from user charges.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1176.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 44503 | 49 App.:1704. | July 12, 1976, Pub. L. 94–353, §25, 90 Stat. 885. |

Section

The words "in accordance with this section" and "due" are omitted as surplus. The word "personnel" is substituted for "manpower" for consistency in the revised title.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the “Report”) of Digital Ecosystems Corp.(the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, the undersigned Kelly H. Nelson, theChief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of theundersigned’s knowledge and belief:     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.Dated: July 14, 2006             /s/ Kelly H. Nelson                   Kelly H. Nelson              Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1204 Surface commingling. ( a ) *What are the requirements for the surface commingling of production?* You must: ( 1 ) Submit a written application to, and obtain approval from, the Regional Supervisor before commencing the commingling of production or making any changes to the previously approved commingling procedures. Your application (which may also include any relevant liquid hydrocarbon and gas measurement requests) must be accompanied by payment of the service fee listed in § 250.125. The service fees are divided into two levels based on complexity, see table in § 250.1202(a)(1).
( 2 ) Upon the request of the Regional Supervisor, lessees who deliver State lease production into a Federal commingling system must provide volumetric or fractional analysis data on the State lease production through the designated system operator.
( b ) *What are the requirements for a periodic well test used for allocation?* You must: ( 1 ) Conduct a well test at least once every 60 days unless the Regional Supervisor approves a different frequency. When a force majeure event precludes the required well test within the prescribed 60 day period (or other frequency approved by the Regional Supervisor), wells must be tested within 15 days after being returned to production. Thereafter, well tests must be conducted at least once every 60 days (or other frequency approved by the Regional Supervisor);
( 2 ) Follow the well test procedures in 30 CFR part 250, subpart K; and
( 3 ) Retain the well test data at the field location for 2 years.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1206

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1206 (formerly part 206) appear at 67 FR 19111, Apr. 18, 2002.

#### § 1206.355 How do I calculate royalty due on geothermal resources I sell at arm's length to a purchaser for direct use?

If you sell geothermal resources produced from Class I, II, or III leases at arm's length to a purchaser for direct use, then the royalty on the geothermal resource is the gross proceeds accruing to you from the sale of the geothermal resource to the arm's-length purchaser multiplied by the royalty rate in your lease or that BLM prescribes under 43 CFR 3211.18. See § 1206.361 for additional provisions applicable to determining gross proceeds under arm's-length sales.
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.527 What must I include in my notification of corrective action? The following information must be included in the notification of corrective action: ( a ) Lessee or Operator name;
( b ) Area name and OCS block number;
( c ) Well name and API number; and
( d ) Casing diagnostic test data.
[76 FR 64462, Oct. 18, 2011. Redesignated at 77 FR 50894, Aug. 22, 2012]
No. 8038.

#### Hicks, Admx., *v.*Weir, Exr.

(Decided October 20, 1903.)

Error to Circuit Court of Hamilton county.

*Messrs. Campbell & ClenDening,*for plaintiff in-error.

*Mr. Laiorence Maxwell, Jr.,*and *Mr. Judson Harmon,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Spear, Shauck and Crew, JJ., concur.
§ 51.102 Responsibilities. ( a ) *Surveillance of noise problem areas.* Appropriate field staff shall maintain surveillance of potential noise problem areas and advise local officials, developers, and planning groups of the unacceptability of sites because of noise exposure at the earliest possible time in the decision process. Every attempt shall be made to insure that applicants' site choices are consistent with the policy and standards contained herein.
( b ) *Notice to applicants.* At the earliest possible stage, HUD program staff shall: ( 1 ) Determine the suitability of the acoustical environment of proposed projects;
( 2 ) Notify applicants of any adverse or questionable situations; and
( 3 ) Assure that prospective applicants are apprised of the standards contained herein so that future site choices will be consistent with these standards.
( c ) *Interdepartmental coordination.* HUD shall foster appropriate coordination between field offices and other departments and agencies, particularly the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Transportation, Department of Defense representatives, and the Department of Veterans Affairs. HUD staff shall utilize the acceptability standards in commenting on the prospective impacts of transportation facilities and other noise generators in the Environmental Impact Statement review process.
[44 FR 40861, July 12, 1979, as amended at 54 FR 39525, Sept. 27, 1989; 61 FR 13333, Mar. 26, 1996]
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Simon Property Group, L.P. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

/s/ DAVID SIMON David Simon
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Simon Property Group, Inc.
General Partner of Simon Property Group, L.P.Date: November 13, 2009/s/ STEPHEN E. STERRETT Stephen E. Sterrett
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Simon Property Group, Inc.
General Partner of Simon Property Group, L.P.Date: November 13, 2009


38

---