alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case: 16-13021 Date Filed: 06/24/2016 Page: 1 of 13Case: 16-13021 Date Filed: 06/24/2016 Page: 2 of 13Case: 16-13021 Date Filed: 06/24/2016 Page: 3 of 13Case: 16-13021 Date Filed: 06/24/2016 Page: 4 of 13Case: 16-13021 Date Filed: 06/24/2016 Page: 5 of 13Case: 16-13021 Date Filed: 06/24/2016 Page: 6 of 13Case: 16-13021 Date Filed: 06/24/2016 Page: 7 of 13Case: 16-13021 Date Filed: 06/24/2016 Page: 8 of 13Case: 16-13021 Date Filed: 06/24/2016 Page: 9 of 13Case: 16-13021 Date Filed: 06/24/2016 Page: 10 of 13Case: 16-13021 Date Filed: 06/24/2016 Page: 11 of 13Case: 16-13021 Date Filed: 06/24/2016 Page: 12 of 13Case: 16-13021 Date Filed: 06/24/2016 Page: 13 of 13
AFS
- 14
- 362
- E

July 29, 2014 Exemption No. 10644A Regulatory

Docket No. FAA
- 2011
- 1049 Mr. Dale Cowley Director of Operations Maverick Helicopters, Inc. 1620 Jet Stream Drive H enderson, NV 89052 Dear Mr. Cowley : This letter is to inform y ou that we have g ranted your petition to extend Exemption No. 10644 . I t explains the basis for our decision , describes its effect, and lists the conditions and limitations. **The Basis for Our Decision**  By letter dated July

2, 2014 , y ou petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Maverick Helicopters, Inc. ( Maverick) for an extension of Exemption No. 10644
. That exemption from § 93.323 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulati ons (14 CFR) allows Maverick relief from the requirement to file a flight plan prior to conducting operations in the Grand Cany on National Park (GCNP) Special Flight Rules Area. Iny our petition, y ou indicate that there has been no change in the condition s and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register beca use the requested extensio n of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any

delay in acting on this pe tition would be detrimental to Maverick
. **Our Decision** The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10644 remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. §§ 106(f), 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator2

has delegat ed to me, Maverick Helicopters, Inc. is hereby granted an extension to their exemption from 1 4 CFR 93.323 , which relieves Maverick from the requirement to file a flight plan prior to conducting operations in the GCNP Special Flight Rules Area
. **The Effect of Our Decision** Th is exemption terminates on September 30, 2016 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded. Sincerely ,

/S/ John Barbagallo Acting Deputy

Director, Flight Standards Service
### §1425. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act June 27, 1934, ch. 847, §214, as added Apr. 23, 1949, ch. 89, §2(a), 63 Stat. 57, and amended, related to insurance of mortgages on property in Guam. See section 1715d of Title 12, Banks and Banking.
#### George S. Moss, Appellant, v. Roy M. Carstairs et al., Respondents. Roy M. Carstairs, Respondent, v. George S. Moss et al., Appellants.

Motion by appellants: (1) to amend the caption in the notice of appeal so as to set forth as defendants-respondents the four corporations: Area Development Corp., Astro Development Corp., Republic Electric & Mfg. Corp. and Fabricated Parts Corp.; (2) to dispense with the printing of an exhibit, to wit, the booklet containing the contents of a tape recording; and (3) to have this court accept as the record on appeal the printed proof of the record submitted on this motion. Motion to amend the caption in the notice of appeal denied, without prejudice to renewal on the argument of the appeal. In the meantime copies of the proposed record and briefs are to be served upon said four corporations or their attorney as though such corporations were respondents on the appeal. Motion to dispense with the printing of said exhibit granted; the original to be submitted on the argument of the appeal. Motion to have the printed proof of the record (submitted on this motion) accepted as the record on appeal, denied. The settlement of the case on appeal should be had before the Trial Justice as prescribed by the statute and rules (Civ. Prae. Act, § 616; Rules Civ. Prac., rules 230-235). Beldoek, Acting P. J., Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                         Outdoor Channel Holdings, Inc.
                             Listing Of Subsidiaries

Details of the consolidated subsidiaries at December 31, 2004 are as follows:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              STATE OF
                              INCORPORATION/
NAME                          ORGANIZATION       PERCENT HELD
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LDMA-AU, Inc.                 Nevada             100%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gold Prospector's             California         100%
Association of
America, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gold Prospector's             California         100% (held by Gold Prospector's
Association of                                   Association of America, Inc.)
America, LLC

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Outdoor Channel, Inc.     Nevada             100% (held by Gold Prospector's
                                                 Association of America, Inc.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Frizzell 

FAA Coordinator 

M-5336A 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building ground floor, 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. 

Washington, DC 20590 

M7 AEROSPACE 

AN Eu!rr SYsTEMS OF AMERICA, UC, CoMPANY 

·--, , .. ~, rJ 

.-: ... :. L 

Feb.25,2013 

Subject: Docket number FAA-2000-8179, Exemption No. 5367K from 14 CFR 

(FAR Section) 91.531 (a) (3), Expiration Date 03/31/2013 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

In accordance with FAR 11.25, M7 Aerospace requests a renewal of Exemption 

5637K, which expires on 3/31/2013. That exemption allows M7 Aerospace's type 

rated company pilots to conduct experimental, maintenance test and ferry flights in 

the SA227 -CC and SA227 -DC airplanes without a second in command (SIC). It also 

permits all operators of M7 Aerospace commuter category airplanes (SA227 -CC, 

SA227-DC and other airplanes on the same type certificate) to conduct flight 

operations without a designated second-in-command pilot, provided the airplane is 

type certificated for single-pilot operations and the airplane is carrying nine or fewer 

passengers. 

Regulations affected: 

14 CFR 91.531 (a)(3) requires two pilots for all large commuter category airplanes 

having a passenger seating configuration of ten or more seats, regardless of the 

passenger load or of FAA approval of the airplane for single-pilot operation. 

Relief sought: 

M7 Aerospace LP asks that exemption 5367K be renewed to continue to allow M7 

Aerospace's type rated company pilots to conduct experimental, maintenance test, 

and ferry flights in the SA227-CC and SA227-DC airplanes without a second in 

command (SIC); and to continue to permit all operators of M7 Aerospace commuter 

category airplanes (SA227 -CC and SA227 -DC and other airplanes on the same type 
certificate) to conduct flight operations without a designated second-in-command 

pilot, provided the airplane is type certificated for single-pilot operations and the 

airplane is carrying nine or fewer passengers. 

Justification: 

The justification detailed in exemption 5367K remains appropriate and ample. We 

believe that an extension of this exemption will continue to provide M7 Aerospace 

and our operators (meeting the requirements of this exemption) increased operating 

flexibility and reduced economic burdens. 

Public Interest: 

An amendment to this exemption will benefit the public by reducing the cost of flight 

test and ferrying aircraft and by reducing the cost of doing business, a cost that 

ultimately is passed on to the public. This exemption allows us to conduct all 

necessary flight operations in preparation for delivery of the airplane to the customer 

without a second-in-command. The absence of a second in command does not 

affect public safety, and reduces the final cost of maintenance of customer's aircraft. 

Federal Register Summary: 

Petitioner: M7 Aerospace LLC 

Section of the FAR affected: 14CFR 91.531 (a) (3) 

Description of Relief Sought To renew exemption 5367K. 

Yours truly, 

M7 Aerospace LLC 

Bob Frizzell 

FAA Coordinator
§ 1241.6 Which ONRR enforcement actions are not subject to a hearing? You may not request a hearing on: ( a ) Your liability under an order identified in a NONC, FCCP, or ILCP if you did not appeal in a timely manner the order under 30 CFR part 1290 or you appealed in a timely manner the order under 30 CFR part 1290 but have exhausted your appeal rights.
( b ) Any correspondence that we send to you to update you on the amount of penalties accrued or outstanding under a FCCP or ILCP ONRR previously served on you.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Call sign "Dustoff"[electronic resource]: a history of U.S. Army aeromedical evacuation fromConception to Hurricane Katrina**
 
Front Matter
 
PARTONE - Fulfilling a Need: From Conception to Combat
Chapter One - An Honorable Heritage
Chapter Two - From Korea through Vietnam
 
PARTTWO - Domestic Duties & Contingency Operations
Chapter Three - Quiet Years, 1973-1980
Chapter Four - New Challenges: Near and Afar, 1981-1990
 
PARTTHREE - An Angry Decade
Chapter Five - Desert Shield/Desert Storm, 1990-1991
Chapter Six - Force Reductions, 1992-1995
Chapter Seven - The Balkans, 1992-Ongoing
 
PARTFOUR - Into the Millennium: New Challenges, at Home and Abroad
Chapter Eight - To 9/11, 2000-2001
Chapter Nine - Again, Into Battle, 2001-2003
Chapter Ten - Aviation Transformation and DomesticOperations, 2002-2005
Chapter Eleven - Warriors of Compassion
 
APPENDICES
 
SuDoc Number:D 104.2:H 62
Item Number:0351-A (online)
CGP systemNumber:000819260
 
August 12, 2019
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 346 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 346

     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow volunteer 
         firefighters a deduction for personal safety clothing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 2005

  Mr. Platts introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow volunteer 
         firefighters a deduction for personal safety clothing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Volunteer Firefighter Tax Relief Act 
of 2005''.

SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR PERSONAL SAFETY CLOTHING OF VOLUNTEER 
              FIREFIGHTERS.

    (a) In General.--Part VII of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to additional itemized 
deductions for individuals) is amended by redesignating section 224 as 
section 225 and by inserting after section 223 the following new 
section:

``SEC. 224. PERSONAL SAFETY CLOTHING OF VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS.

    ``In the case of an individual who is a volunteer with a volunteer 
fire department, there shall be allowed as a deduction an amount equal 
to the amount paid during the taxable year for personal safety clothing 
(including helmets and boots) designed for use, and to be used by such 
individual, in performing fire fighting services for such department.''
    (b) Deduction Allowed Whether or not Taxpayer Itemizes Other 
Deductions.--Subsection (a) of section 62 of such Code is amended by 
inserting before the last sentence thereof the following new paragraph:
            ``(21) Personal safety clothing of volunteer 
        firefighters.--The deduction allowed by section 224.''.
    (c) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for such part VII is 
amended by striking the last item and inserting the following new item:

``Sec. 224. Personal safety clothing of volunteer firefighters.''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### §41506. Price division filing requirements for foreign air transportation

Every air carrier and foreign air carrier shall keep currently on file with the Secretary of Transportation, if the Secretary requires, the established divisions of all joint prices for foreign air transportation in which the carrier participates.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1134.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 41506 | 49 App.:1373(d). | Aug. 23, 1958, Pub. L. 85–726, §403(d), 72 Stat. 759. |
| | 49 App.:1551(a)(4)(B) (related to 49 App.:1373(d)), (b)(1)(E). | Aug. 23, 1958, Pub. L. 85–726, 72 Stat. 731, §1601(a)(4)(B) (related to §403(d)), (b)(1)(E); added Oct. 4, 1984, Pub. L. 98–443, §3(c), (e), 98 Stat. 1703, 1704. |

Section

The words "foreign air transportation" are substituted for "air transportation" because 49 App.:1551(a)(4)(B) provides that 49 App.:1373 no longer applies to interstate or overseas air transportation and 49 App.:1376(a)–(e), restated in section 41901 of the revised title, governs rates for the transportation of mail by aircraft. See section 40102(a) of the revised title defining "air transportation" to mean interstate or foreign air transportation or the transportation of mail by aircraft.
§ 282.28 Environmental protection measures. ( a ) - ( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) ( 1 ) The lessee shall monitor activities in a manner that develops the data and information necessary to enable the Director to assess the impacts of exploration, testing, mining, and processing activities on the environment on and off the lease; develop and evaluate methods for mitigating adverse environmental effects; validate assessments made in previous environmental evaluations; and ensure compliance with lease and other requirements for the protection of the environment.
( 2 ) Monitoring of environmental effects shall include determination of the spatial and temporal environmental changes induced by the exploration, testing, development, production, and processing activities on the flora and fauna of the sea surface, the water column, and/or the seafloor.
( 3 ) The Director may place observers onboard exploration, testing, mining, and processing vessels; installations; or structures to ensure that the provisions of the lease, the approved plan, and these regulations are followed and to evaluate the effectiveness of the approved monitoring and mitigation practices and procedures in protecting the environment.
( 4 ) The Director may order or the lessee may request a modification of the approved monitoring program prior to the startup of testing activities or commercial-scale recovery, and at other appropriate times as necessary, to reflect accurately the proposed operations or to incorporate the results of recent research or improved monitoring techniques.
( 5 ) [Reserved]
( 6 ) When required, the monitoring plan will specify: ( i ) The sampling techniques and procedures to be used to acquire the needed data and information;
( ii ) The format to be used in analysis and presentation of the data and information;
( iii ) The equipment, techniques, and procedures to be used in carrying out the monitoring program; and
( iv ) The name and qualifications of person(s) designated to be responsible for carrying out the environmental monitoring.
( d ) Lessees shall develop and conduct their operations in a manner designed to avoid, minimize, or otherwise mitigate environmental impacts and to demonstrate the effectiveness of efforts to that end. Based upon results of the monitoring program, the Director may specify particular procedures for mitigating environmental impacts.
( e ) [Reserved]
### §14916. Unlawful brokerage activities

(a) Prohibited Activities.—A person may provide interstate brokerage services as a broker only if that person—

(1) is registered under, and in compliance with, section 13904; and

(2) has satisfied the financial security requirements under section 13906.

(b) Exceptions.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to—

(1) a non-vessel-operating common carrier (as defined in section 40102 of title 46) or an ocean freight forwarder (as defined in section 40102 of title 46) when arranging for inland transportation as part of an international through movement involving ocean transportation between the United States and a foreign port;

(2) a customs broker licensed in accordance with section 111.2 of title 19, Code of Federal Regulations, only to the extent that the customs broker is engaging in a movement under a customs bond or in a transaction involving customs business, as defined by section 111.1 of title 19, Code of Federal Regulations; or

(3) an indirect air carrier holding a Standard Security Program approved by the Transportation Security Administration, only to the extent that the indirect air carrier is engaging in the activities as an air carrier as defined in section 40102(2) or in the activities defined in section 40102(3).

(c) Civil Penalties and Private Cause of Action.—Any person who knowingly authorizes, consents to, or permits, directly or indirectly, either alone or in conjunction with any other person, a violation of subsection (a) is liable—

(1) to the United States Government for a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed $10,000 for each violation; and

(2) to the injured party for all valid claims incurred without regard to amount.

(d) Liable Parties.—The liability for civil penalties and for claims under this section for unauthorized brokering shall apply, jointly and severally—

(1) to any corporate entity or partnership involved; and

(2) to the individual officers, directors, and principals of such entities.

(Added Pub. L. 112–141, div. C, title II, §32919(a), July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 827; amended Pub. L. 114–94, div. A, title V, §5508(a)(5), Dec. 4, 2015, 129 Stat. 1554.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2015—Pub. L. 114–94 substituted section symbol for "SEC." before section designation.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2015 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–94 effective Oct. 1, 2015, see section 1003 of Pub. L. 114–94, set out as a note under section 5313 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 2012, see section 3(a) of Pub. L. 112–141, set out as an Effective and Termination Dates of 2012 Amendment note under section 101 of Title 23, Highways.
#### § 36.5 Letters of certification.

When a component or subassembly meets all of the applicable requirements of Subparts B and C of this part, and also its normal operation will not be affected by connection to adjacent components or subassemblies, MSHA will issue to the applicant, upon his request, a letter of certification informing him that additional inspection or tests of the component or subassembly will not be required when it is incorporated without modification in a piece of completely assembled mobile diesel-powered transportation equipment. The applicant may cite this letter of certification to another applicant who seeks approval and certification of his completely assembled mobile diesel-powered transportation equipment and who desires to incorporate the component or subassembly in such equipment.
### §41710. Time requirements

When a matter requiring action of the Secretary of Transportation is submitted under section 40109(a) or (c)–(h), 41309, or 42111 of this title and an evidentiary hearing—

(1) is ordered, the Secretary shall make a final decision on the matter not later than the last day of the 12th month that begins after the date the matter is submitted; or

(2) is not ordered, the Secretary shall make a final decision on the matter not later than the last day of the 6th month that begins after the date the matter is submitted.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1142.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 41710 | 49 App.:1490. | Aug. 23, 1958, Pub. L. 85–726, 72 Stat. 731, §1010; added Oct. 24, 1978, Pub. L. 95–504, §38(a), 92 Stat. 1743. |
| | 49 App.:1551(b)(1)(E). | Aug. 23, 1958, Pub. L. 85–726, 72 Stat. 731, §1601(b)(1)(E); added Oct. 4, 1984, Pub. L. 98–443, §3(e), 98 Stat. 1704. |

Section

In this section, before clause (1), the words "matter requiring action of the Secretary" are substituted for "application or other written document" for clarity. The reference to 49 App.:1378 and 1379 is omitted as obsolete because under 49 App.:1551(a)(7), those sections ceased to be in effect on January 1, 1989. The words "on or after the one-hundred-eightieth day after October 24, 1978" are omitted as executed. In clauses (1) and (2), the words "order or" are omitted as surplus.