alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

                CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                     PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. 78M(A) OR 78O(D)
                 (SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


I, Jeffrey Parker, Vice Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Odd Job Stores, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

           a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

           b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

           c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and ;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

           a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

           b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


                                  /s/ Jeffrey Parker
Date: November 14, 2003           ---------------------------------------------
                                  Jeffrey Parker
                                  Vice Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.813 Subsurface-controlled SSSVs.

You may submit an APM or a request to the District Manager for approval to equip a dry tree well with a subsurface-controlled SSSV in lieu of a surface-controlled SSSV, if the subsurface-controlled SSSV is installed in a well equipped with a surface-controlled SSSV that has become inoperable and cannot be repaired without removal and reinstallation of the tubing. If you remove and reinstall the tubing, you must equip the well with a surface-controlled SSSV.
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Scott Tyrone Andrews

*Susan M. Hankins,*assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

*John A. East III,*deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided January 6, 1993

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 533 (AC 10597), is denied.
#### § 18.49 Connection boxes on machines.

Connection boxes used to facilitate replacement of cables or machine components shall be explosion-proof. Portable-cable terminals on cable reels need not be in explosion-proof enclosures provided that connections are well made, adequately insulated, protected from damage by location, and securely clamped to prevent mechanical strain on the connections.
#### § 1227.804 How else may a State's delegation agreement terminate?

You may request ONRR to terminate your delegation at any time by submitting your written notice of intent 6 months prior to the date on which you want to terminate. ONRR will determine the date your agreement is terminated and will notify you of that date in writing. ONRR will determine the termination date based on the number of delegated functions and the impact of the termination on all affected parties.
### §32708. Confidentiality of information

(a) General.—Information obtained by the Secretary of Transportation under this chapter related to a confidential matter referred to in section 1905 of title 18 may be disclosed only—

(1) to another officer or employee of the United States Government for use in carrying out this chapter; or

(2) in a proceeding under this chapter.

(b) Withholding Information From Congress.—This section does not authorize information to be withheld from a committee of Congress authorized to have the information.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1054.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 32708 | 15:1990d(d). | Oct. 20, 1972, Pub. L. 92–513, 86 Stat. 947, §414(d); added July 14, 1976, Pub. L. 94–364, §408(2), 90 Stat. 987. |

Section

In subsection (a), before clause (1), the words "reported to or otherwise" and "or his representative" are omitted as surplus. The words "related to a confidential matter referred to" are substituted for "contains or relates to a trade secret or other matter referred to" to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "shall be considered confidential for the purpose of that section" are omitted as surplus.

In subsection (b), the words "a committee of Congress authorized to have the information" are substituted for "the duly authorized committees of the Congress" for clarity.
§ 550.1497 When will BOEM monitor my financial solvency? ( a ) If you are presumptively financially solvent under § 550.1496(b), BOEM will determine your net worth as described under §§ 550.1496(b) and (c) to evaluate your financial solvency at least annually on the date we first determined that you demonstrated financial solvency as long as you have active appeals and each time you appeal a new order.
( b ) If you ask us to consult a business-information or credit-reporting service or program under § 550.1496(c), we will consult a service or program annually as long as you have active appeals and each time you appeal a new order.
( c ) If our bond-approving officer determines that you are no longer financially solvent, you must post a bond or other BOEM-specified surety instrument under §§ 550.1490 and 550.1491.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-82,551-01

EX P ARTE CESAR IVAN CHAVEZ , Appli cant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. W08-64527-R ( A) IN THE 265 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM DALLAS COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant wa s convicted of capital murder and sentenced to li fe imprisonment. The F ifth Court of Appea ls aff irmed hi s conviction. Chavez

v. State , No. 05-10-00132- CR (Tex. App.—Dallas May 31, 2011)(not desig nated for publication). On J une 18, 2014, a timely order desig nating issues was signe d by the trial court. I t appea rs that t h e trial court wished to obtain aff idavits and response s befor e making finding s and a
reco m m en d at i o n to this Court. We rema nd this application to the 265 District Court of Dallas t h County to allow the trial judge to complete an evidentiar y investigation and enter finding s of fac t and-2-

conclusions of law
. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved within 30 day s of this order
. A supplemental transcr ipt co n t ai n i n g al l aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hear ing or deposition, along with the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be forwa rded to this Court within 60 day s of the date of this order
. Any extensions of time shall be obtained fr om this C ourt.
Filed: January

14, 2015 Do not publish
#### Leon E. Wein, Appellant, v Comptroller of the State of New York et al., Respondents.

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County, entered on September 1, 1977, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Nadel, J., at Special Term, without costs and without disbursements. Concur—Murphy, P. J.,'Birns, Fein, Lane and Lynch, JJ.
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Joseph W. Baty, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Weider Nutrition International, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: October 7, 2003 |  | /s/JOSEPH W. BATYJoseph W. Baty
Chief Financial Officer
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------

22

---

QuickLinks
| **Debt - Debt and Lease Covenants (Details) (USD $)In Millions, unless otherwise specified** | 12 Months Ended |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
||
| **Debt Instrument [Line Items]**                                                             |            |   |   |
| Payments to subsidiary to meet convenant requirement                                         | $ 0             | $ 0 | $ 0 |
| Navistar Financial Corporation [Member]                                                      |            |   |   |
| **Debt Instrument [Line Items]**                                                             |            |   |   |
| Fixed charge coverage ratio                                                                  | 125.00%         |   |   |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Debt Instrument, Covenant Compliance, Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, Maximum
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**nav_DebtInstrumentCovenantComplianceFixedChargeCoverageRatioMaximum**Namespace Prefix:**nav_**Data Type:**num:percentItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Payments to subsidiary to meet convenant requirement
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**nav_PaymentsToSubsidiaryToMeetConvenantRequirement**Namespace Prefix:**nav_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**credit**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                           |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_DebtInstrumentLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Boardof Directors 

Market Leader, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-121294 and No. 333-138412) on Form S-8 of Market Leader, Inc. of our report dated March 15, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheetsof Market Leader, Inc as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related financial statement schedule, which report appearsin the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of Market Leader, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Seattle, Washington 

March 15, 2010
From: Miller, William [ mailto:wmiller@McCarter.com ]

Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 4:59 PM

To: Cohen, Daniel

Cc: Clay, Kathryn; 'Dave Schryver'; Cymbalsky, John; 'Bert Kalisch'; rmurphy@aga.org ; Leslie, Neil ( Neil.Leslie@gastechnology.org ) Subject: RE: Furnaces Data

Dan: per our earlier email exchanges, attached are the initial questions of APGA/AGA regarding the LCC spreadsheets distributed by DOE regarding the furnace rule remand. We anticipate that we will have additional questions by the time of the Nov. 7 meeting, as we are continuing our review; we also anticipate that the answers provided at the Nov. 7 meeting will inevitably lead to follow

- up questions and answers in order to better understand the contents of these very complex spreadsheets. If there are any clarification questions about our questions that DOE would like to have answered before the Nov. 7 meeting in order to make it a more productive session, please contact us. In any event, we will be prepared to begin the Nov. 7 meeting with our questions being asked and answered. Thank you for your continued cooperati on in this matter. Bud
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-20942

EMMA J. HAYNES, Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS M.D. ANDERSON CANCER CENTER, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas

(H-95-CV-2611) May 20, 1997

Before KING, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Emma Haynes appeals from the distri ct court’s grant of the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center’s motion for
summary judgm ent in her employment discrimination action under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq . Haynes alleges failure to promote and wrongful termination in violation of Title VII. Thedistrict cou rt concluded, i nter alia , that Haynes was unable to

raise a genuine issue of material fact regardin g the articulated non-discriminatory reasons proffered b y the hospital to explain both not promoting Haynes and subsequently firing her. We have reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs and find

no reversible error. Therefore, we AFFIRM the grant of summary judgment.
Exhibit 32.2

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of General Communication, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John M. Lowber, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date:  June 10, 2008 | /s/ John M. Lowber          |
|----------------------|-----------------------------|
|                 | John M. Lowber              |
|                 | Chief Financial Officer     |
|                 | General Communication, Inc. |

 

 

 

1
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: CHRISTOPHER PAUL RABALAIS,

Debtor,

------------------------------

CHRISTOPHER PAUL RABALAIS,

Appellant,

v.

SETH LEON,

Appellee. No. 21

- 60025

BAP No. 20

- 1216

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel

Gan, Faris, and Lafferty III, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted April 1 7 , 2023 * *

Before: CLIFTON, R. NELSON, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Christopher Paul Rabalais appeals pro se from the decision of the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

APR 25 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 21

- 60025

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirming the bankruptcy court’s order allowing

creditor Seth Leon to dismiss voluntarily an adversary proceeding. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo the bankruptcy court’s

conclusions of law and for clear error its findings of fact. Decker v. Tramiel (In re

JTS Corp.) , 617 F.3d 1102, 1109 (9 th Cir. 2010). We affirm.

The bankruptcy court did not abuse it s discretion by allowing Leon to

dismiss voluntarily his adversary complaint because Rabalais failed to show legal

prejudice

. See Smith v. Lenches , 263 F.3d 972, 975 (9 th Cir. 2001) (setting forth

standard of review and stating a court “should grant a mot ion for voluntary

dismissal under Rule 41(a)(2) unless a defendant can show that it will suffer some

plain legal prejudice as a result.”).

We reject as meritless Rabalais’s contention s concerning res judicata and

whether the judgment debt is discharge able

.

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 18 - 0 670 IN THE MATTER OF: H.E.B.K. Respondent and Appellant. ORDER Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 29 , 2020 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 20 2020

03/20/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0670
Document

EXHIBIT 10.12.1

SCHEDULE OF SIGNATORIES TO DIRECTOR
INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENTS




1. Betty R. Johnson


2. William E. Waltz Jr.


3. A. Mark Zeffiro


4. Jeri L. Isbell


5. Wilbert W. James Jr


6. Michael V. Schrock


7. Justin A. Kershaw


8. Scott H. Muse


9. William R. VanArsdale
Exhibit 23.1


          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
          --------------------------------------------------------


We consent to the use, in the statement on Form 10K of Quantum Energy Inc.,
of our report dated June 9, 2010 on our audit of the financial statements of
Quantum Energy Inc. as of February 28, 2010 and 2009, and the related
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years
ended February 28, 2010 and 2009, and the reference to us under the caption
"Experts."


/s/ Killman, Murrell & Company, P.C.
------------------------------------
    Killman, Murrell & Company, P.C.
    Odessa, Texas
    June 9, 2010



<PAGE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1





                             FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
                              BOWATER INCORPORATED
                             2002 STOCK OPTION PLAN


         WHEREAS, Bowater Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
established the Bowater Incorporated 2002 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan"); and

         WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to provide that certain
amendments to the Plan may only be made with the approval of a majority in
interest of the stockholders;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective July 31, 2002, as
follows:

         Section 19 of the Plan is amended by adding the following sentence at
the end thereof:

                  "No amendment to (i) expand the class of persons to whom
                  Awards may be made, or (ii) increase the number of shares
                  subject to the Plan under Section 5, may be made without the
                  approval of a majority in interest of the Company's
                  stockholders."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to be
executed by its duly authorized officer this 16th day of September, 2002.

                                        BOWATER INCORPORATED



                                        By:      /s/ David G. Maffucci
                                                 -------------------------------
                                        Name:    David G. Maffucci
                                        Title:   Executive Vice President, Chief
                                                 Financial Officer and Secretary