alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IMPSAT Fiber Networks on Form 10-Q
for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ricardo A. Verdaguer, Chief
Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge, that:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.

|                      |  |                                                           
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2003 |  |                                                           
|                      |  |                                                           
|                      |  | /s/ Ricardo A. Verdaguer                                  
|                      |  |                                                           
|                      |  | Ricardo A. Verdaguer
President and Chief Executive Officer
### §§751, 752. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections ceased to be effective Mar. 17, 2000, pursuant to section 765d(1) of this title.

Section 751, Pub. L. 87–624, title V, §502, as added Pub. L. 95–564, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2392; amended Pub. L. 103–414, title III, §303(b)(4), Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4296, related to congressional declaration of policy and purpose of this subchapter.

Section 752, Pub. L. 87–624, title V, §503, as added Pub. L. 95–564, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2392; amended Pub. L. 103–414, title III, §§303(b)(4), 304(b)(5), Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4296, 4297, related to the corporation's status as the sole designated operating entity of the United States.
### **CHAPTER 448—UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS**

Sec.
44801.
Definitions.
44802.
Integration of civil unmanned aircraft systems into national airspace system.
44803.
Unmanned aircraft system test ranges.
44804.
Unmanned aircraft in the Arctic.
44805.
Small unmanned aircraft safety standards.
44806.
Public unmanned aircraft systems and public safety use of tethered unmanned aircraft systems.
44807.
Special authority for certain unmanned aircraft systems.
44808.
Carriage of property by small unmanned aircraft systems for compensation or hire.
44809.
Exception for limited recreational operations of unmanned aircraft.
44810.
Airport safety and airspace hazard mitigation and enforcement.
44811.
Beyond visual line of sight operations for unmanned aircraft systems.
44812.
Temporary flight restrictions for unmanned aircraft.
44813.
Center of Excellence for Unmanned Aircraft Systems.
44814.
ASSUREd Safe credentialing authority.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2024**—Pub. L. 118–63, title IX, §§902(b), 925(b)(2), 926(b), 930(b), 935(b), title X, §§1006(b), 1007(b), May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1341, 1360, 1361, 1367, 1372, 1389, added items 44803, 44804, 44806, and 44811 to 44814 and struck out former items 44803 "Unmanned aircraft system test ranges", 44804 "Small unmanned aircraft in the Arctic", and 44806 "Public unmanned aircraft systems".

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title III, §§343(b), 344(b), 345(c), 346(b)(1), 347(b)(1), 348(b), 349(b)(1), 383(b)(1), Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3290, 3291, 3293, 3295–3297, 3300, 3322, added items 44803 to 44810.
EXHIBIT 10.1
​

AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED Employment Agreement
​
This Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of November 18, 2022, by and among HBT Financial, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“HBT”), Heartland Bank and Trust Company, an Illinois state-chartered bank (the “Bank,” and together with HBT, “Heartland”), and Patrick F. Busch (“Employee”).
Recitals
A.Employee is currently employed by Heartland as Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer of HBT, and President and Chief Lending Officer of the Bank, pursuant to that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and among Heartland and Employee dated February 22, 2021 (the “Employment Agreement”).
B.Employee has expressed his intention to retire from his current positions of employment with Heartland effective as of December 31, 2022 and continue thereafter as an employee of the Bank.
C.Heartland desires to continue to employ Employee, effective as of January 1, 2023, as an “at will” employee of the Bank.
D.Pursuant to Section 14 of the Employment Agreement, Heartland and Employee may amend the Employment Agreement in writing executed by all parties thereto.
E.Heartland and Employee desire to amend the Employment Agreement as provided herein.

Agreements
In consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual promises and covenants of the Parties set forth in this Amendment, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby covenant and agree to the following revisions to the Employment Agreement:
		1.	The “Employment Period” described in Section 2 of the Employment Agreement shall end, and except as otherwise described in this Amendment the Employment Agreement shall terminate and be without further effect, as of December 31, 2022.	

		2.	Heartland and Employee intend that, with respect to calendar year 2022 performance objectives, Employee shall remain eligible to receive, as determined in the discretion of the Board, the annual incentive bonus described in Section 4.b. of the Employment Agreement and the annual long-term incentive award described in Section 4.c. of the Employment Agreement.	

		3.	The restrictive covenants set forth in Section 6 of the Employment Agreement shall survive the termination of the Employment Agreement with any post-employment period of applicability commencing upon the full and final termination of Employee’s employment with Heartland.	

		4.	Employee acknowledges and agrees that nothing contained in this Amendment shall constitute Good Reason for purposes of the Employment Agreement.	


​



​

		5.	Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings proscribed to such terms in the Employment Agreement.	


****
In Witness Whereof, the Parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first set forth above.
	HBT Financial, Inc.
	Patrick F. Busch


By: ​ ​/s/ Fred L. Drake​ ​​ ​/s/ Patrick F. Busch​ ​
Name:Fred L. Drake
Its:Chairman and CEO
​
​
Heartland Bank and Trust Company
By: ​ ​/s/ Fred L. Drake​ ​
Name:Fred L. Drake
Its:Chairman

​
V 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3261 

For the relief of Luis Nava, Yuliana Huicochea, Oscar Corona, and Jaime 

Damian. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 12, 2005 

Mr. PASTOR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Luis Nava, Yuliana Huicochea, Oscar 

Corona, and Jaime Damian. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF GROUNDS FOR REMOVAL OF, OR 

4 DENIAL OF ADMISSION TO, LUIS NAVA, 

5 YULIANA HUICOCHEA, OSCAR CORONA, AND 

6 JAIME DAMIAN. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding sections 212(a) 

8 and 237(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Luis 

9 Nava, Yuliana Huicochea, Oscar Corona, and Jaime 

10 Damian may not be removed from the United States, de-
2 

•HR 3261 IH 

1 nied admission to the United States, or considered ineli2 gible for lawful permanent residence in the United States, 

3 by reason of any ground for removal or denial of admission 

4 that is reflected in the records of the Department of 

5 Homeland Security, the Immigration and Naturalization 

6 Service of the Department of Justice, or the Visa Office 

7 of the Department of State, on the date of the enactment 

8 of this Act. 

9 (b) RESCISSION OF OUTSTANDING ORDER OF RE10 MOVAL.—The Secretary of Homeland Security, or the At11 torney General, as appropriate, shall rescind any out12 standing order of removal or deportation, or any finding 

13 of deportability, that has been entered against Luis Nava, 

14 Yuliana Huicochea, Oscar Corona, and Jaime Damian by 

15 reason of any ground described in subsection (a). 

Æ
Exhibit 32.4


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


I, Keith Favreau, the Chief Financial Officer of Odd Job Stores, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

           (1) The accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending June 30,
           2003 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
           "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.



Date: August 14, 2003                    By: /s/ Keith Favreau
                                             --------------------------------
                                             Keith Favreau
                                             Vice President - Finance
                                             (Chief Financial Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6944

LARRY SAMUEL JONES, JR.,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

KENNETH STOLLIE, Head Sheriff; MR. HOLCOMB, Captain; MR. 

DEJESUS, Corporal 95-038; MR. BRYAN, Deputy; MR. BRANNON, 

Deputy; MR. INMAN, Deputy,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District 

Judge. (2:13-cv-00219-RAJ-TEM)

Submitted: September 26, 2013 Decided: September 30, 2013

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Samuel Jones, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Larry Jones, Jr., appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915A(b) (2006), for failure to state a claim. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we deny Jones’ motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Stollie, No. 

2:13-cv-00219-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. filed May 30, 2013 & entered 

May 31, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF IMPSAT CORPORATION AND ITS CONSOLIDATED
SUBSIDIARIES AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         139,303
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,356
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,212
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               202,776
<PP&E>                                         315,342
<DEPRECIATION>                                 126,104
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 554,314
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          113,568
<BONDS>                                        381,486
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          125,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       100,793
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   554,314
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               149,888
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  132,212
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,243
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,257
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,243
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,269)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,358
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,344)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Claudia Walker, Respondent, v. Milton U. Sheldon et al., Appellants.

Order, entered March 28, 1960, denying a motion by defendant Sheldon for relief pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice, unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of striking from paragraph Seventh (a) (i) of the complaint the words beginning with “ to book publishers ” and ending with *“*Federal Trade Commission ”, striking all of the allegations in paragraph Seventh (a) (ii), and striking all of the matter in paragraph Tenth beginning with the words “ until the completion of a proceeding ” to the end of the paragraph and substituting therefor the words “ until the year 1959 ”; and, as so modified, the order is affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant Sheldon. The stricken matter is clearly irrelevant and will unduly prejudice the defendant if permitted to remain in the pleading. As to the allegations in paragraph Eleventh of the complaint, which conclude with the claim that plaintiff is entitled to punitive damages, while ordinarily punitive damages will not be allowed in an action in fraud and deceit *(Oehlhof*v. *Solomon,*73 App. Div. 329; *Toho Bussan Kaisha, Ltd.*v. *American President Lines,*265 F. 2d 418), it may be that plaintiff can at a trial prove that defendants’ actions constituted a virtually larcenous scheme to trap generally the unwary in which event punitive damages may be recoverable on the theory of wanton and malicious conduct. Under the circumstances, the allegations relatable to punitive damages may remain in the pleading until the facts are developed on a trial. An amended complaint eliminating the allegations ordered to be stricken hereinabove is to be served within 10 days after service of a copy of the order to be entered hereon, with notice of entry. Settle order on notice. Order, entered March 28, 1960, denying a motion by the defendants other than Sheldon, for relief pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice and for a dismissal of the complaint pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of granting the motion under rule 103 by striking from the complaint the same allegations ordered to be stricken in the companion appeal of the defendant Sheldon, decided simultaneously herewith, and, as so modified, the order is affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants, other than Sheldon. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and Eager, JJ.
§ 1227.102 What royalty management functions will ONRR not delegate? This section lists the principal royalty management functions that ONRR will not delegate to a State. ONRR will not delegate to a State the following functions: ( a ) ONRR must collect all moneys received from sales, bonuses, rentals, royalties, civil penalties, assessments and interest. ONRR also must collect any moneys a lessee or its designee pays because of audits or other actions of a delegated State;
( b ) ONRR must compare all cash and other payments it receives with payments shown on royalty reports or other documents, such as bills, to reconcile payor accounts. ONRR also must disburse all appropriate moneys to States and other revenue recipients, including refunds and interest owed to lessees and their designees;
( c ) The Department of the Interior will receive, process, and decide all administrative appeals from demands or other orders issued to lessees, their designees, or any other person, including demands or orders a delegated State issues;
( d ) Only ONRR may take enforcement actions other than issuing demands, subpoenas and orders to perform restructured accounting. ONRR or the appropriate Federal agency will issue notices of non-compliance and civil penalties, collect debts, write off delinquent debts, pursue litigation, enforce subpoenas, and manage any alternative dispute resolution. ONRR will conduct, coordinate and approve any settlement or other compromise of an obligation that a lessee or its designee owes;
( e ) ONRR will decide all valuation policies, including issuing valuation regulations, determinations, and guidelines, and interpreting valuation regulations; and
( f ) ONRR may reserve additional authorities and responsibilities not included in paragraphs (a) through (f) of this section.
[62 FR 43084, Aug. 12, 1997, as amended at 75 FR 61087, Oct. 4, 2010]
Exhibit
32.2




18
U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification




In
connection with the Annual Report of NGP Capital Resources Company (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Stephen K. Gardner, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




March 16, 2009


/s/ STEPHEN K. GARDNERStephen
      K. Gardner,Chief
      Financial Officer and
Treasurer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
NGP Capital Resources Company and will be retained by NGP Capital Resources
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TTI INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST
31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE BY SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                             166
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   166
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,166
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,877
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,950
<COMMON>                                        42,128
<OTHER-SE>                                    (94,789)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,166
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               363,495
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (363,495)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (363,495)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (363,495)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.501 Definition.

When used in this subpart, the following term shall have the meaning given below:

*Well-completion operations* means the work conducted to establish the production of a well after the production-casing string has been set, cemented, and pressure-tested.
§ 93.50 Formula allocation. ( a ) *Allocations to States.* HUD will provide to the States allocations of funds in amounts determined by the formula described in this part.
( b ) *Amount available for allocation.* The amount of funds available for allocation by the formula is the balance remaining after providing for other purposes authorized by Congress, in accordance with the Act and appropriations.
( c ) *Allocations for the insular areas.* The allocation amount for each insular area is determined by multiplying the funds available times the ratio of renter households in each insular area to the total number of renter households in the 50 States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the insular areas.
( d ) *Allocations for the 50 States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia* — ( 1 ) *Amounts available for allocations.* The amount of funds that is available for allocation by the formula to the 50 States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia is determined using the most current data available from the U.S. Census Bureau that is available for the same year for all these geographic areas. The amount is equal to the balance of funds remaining after determining formula allocations for the insular areas under § 93.50(c). For purposes of paragraphs (d)(1) and (2) of this section, the term “State” means any of the 50 United States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia.
( 2 ) *Allocations.* ( i ) Allocations to the States are determined using the four needs factors described in § 93.51(a) through (d), multiplying each factor by the amount available under § 93.51(d)(1) by its priority weight, and summing the four factors for each State.
( ii ) The factor described in § 93.51(a) is weighted 0.5. The factors described in § 93.51(b) and (d) are weighted at 0.125 and the factor described in § 93.51(c) of this section is weighted at 0.25.
( iii ) The sum of the four needs factors for each State is then multiplied by the construction cost factor described in § 93.51(e) of this section and by the total amount of funds available for State allocations.