alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 20.7 Specific requirements. Two general classes of electric lamps are recognized in these requirements, namely: Class 1, those that are self-contained and easily carried by hand, and class 2, those that may or may not be self-contained and not so readily portable as the first class. ( a ) *Class 1.* Class 1 includes hand lamps, signal lamps, inspection lamps, flashlights, and animal lamps which are operated by small storage batteries or dry cells.
( b ) *Class 2.* Class 2 includes lamps such as the pneumatic-electric types and large battery lamps.
## www.uavsolutions.com 8280 Patuxent Range Rd. Suite E · Jessup, MD 20794 · (Phone) 240-456-0195UAV Solutions, Inc. is a woman-owned small business that designs, manufactures and delivers innovative unmanned systems. Our state-of-the-art facilities allow us to rapidly design, assemble, integrate and test high quality production systems. Helping our public and private sector customers fulfi ll their most important missions is our passion. UAVS products are export controlled and may require U.S. Government authorization prior to export or re-export. Tactical GCS Portable GCS The UAV Solutions, Inc. (UAVS) line of fi xed wing UAS, developed for military and commercial use, is built from 7075 aircraft grade aluminum and composite materials. Our systems are designed for ease of use to accomplish long endurance missions. The UAVS-developed Dragon View combined electro-optic/infrared imager with pan and title stabilized gimbal was designed for these and other UAS. Our systems also have the capability to carry different ISR or multi-spectral sensors. We have adopted an open architecture philosophy for software and hardware components that provides customers with fl exibility for future product enhancement. UAVS designs and builds ground control systems for command and control of unmanned vehicles. These solutions range from a Portable Tactical Ground Control System (GCS) with three screens for mission planning and video viewing – ideal for larger aircraft and larger crews - to the
Tactical GCS with two screens to a lower cost solution that is a communications radio which can be attached to an IP-based tough book or lap top. A common GCS can be used for UAVS fi xed wing and multi rotor platforms.

Features: • Fully autonomous systems with multiple user modes • Open architecture systems • Comprehensive Operations and Maintenance Manuals including maintenance schedule and troubleshooting guide
**DM** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0607 IN THE MATTER OF : B. A. F., An Alleged Mentally Ill Person.

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 -day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including November 29 , 2020 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court October 27 2020

10/27/2020
Case Number: DA 19-0607
§ 964.125 Eligibility for resident council membership. ( a ) Any member of a public housing household, not including members of a non-public housing over-income family as defined in § 960.102 of this chapter, whose name is on the lease of a unit in the public housing development and meets the requirements of the by-laws is eligible to be a member of a resident council. The resident council may establish additional criteria that are non-discriminatory and do not infringe on rights of other residents in the development. Such criteria must be stated in the by-laws or constitution as appropriate.
( b ) The right to vote for resident council board shall be limited to designated heads of households (any age) and other members of the household who are 18 years or older whose name appears on the lease of a unit in the public housing development represented by the resident council.
( c ) Any qualified voting member of a resident council who meets the requirements described in the by-laws and is in compliance with the lease may seek office and serve on the resident council governing board.
[59 FR 43636, Aug. 24, 1994, as amended at 88 FR 9675, Feb. 14, 2023]
###### Editorial Note on Part 982

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999, and at 89 FR 38293, May 7, 2024.

#### § 982.160 HUD determination to administer a local program.

If the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing determines that there is no PHA organized, or that there is no PHA able and willing to implement the provisions of this part for an area, HUD (or an entity acting on behalf of HUD) may enter into HAP contracts with owners and perform the functions otherwise assigned to PHAs under this part with respect to the area.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2577-0169)

[60 FR 34695, July 3, 1995, as amended at 60 FR 45661, Sept. 1, 1995]
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SimonProperty Group, L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)                    The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                    Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ David Simon                                                                            |        |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| David Simon                                                                                |   |
| Chief Executive Officer  of Simon Property Group, Inc.,                               |   |
| General Partner of Simon  Property Group, L.P.                                             |   |
| Date: August 12,  2005                                                                |   |
| /s/  Stephen E. Sterrett                                                                   |   |
| Stephen E. Sterrett                                                                        |   |
| Executive Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer  of Simon Property Group, Inc., |   |
| General Partner of Simon  Property Group, L.P.                                             |   |
| Date:  August 12, 2005                                                                |   |

 

36

----
Exhibit 32.2 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification In connection with the Annual Report of NGP Capital Resources Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, L. Scott Biar, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Compliance Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. March 7, 2014 /s/ L. SCOTT BIARL. Scott Biar Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Compliance Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NGP Capital Resources Company and will be retained by NGP Capital Resources Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

J. Erik Fyrwald, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Nalco Holding Company (Nalco)
and Bradley J. Bell, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Nalco, in conjunction with the filing of Nalcos 10-K financial report (the Report) with the Securities and Exchange Commission, covering the period ending
December 31, 2009, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as follows:



| | a. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | b. | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Nalco.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ J. ERIK FYRWALDJ. Erik FyrwaldChairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: February 26, 2010/s/ BRADLEY J. BELLBradley J. BellExecutive Vice President and ChiefFinancial OfficerDate: February 26, 2010


A signed original of this
written statement required by §906 has been provided to Nalco Holding Company and will be retained by Nalco Holding Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
---



##### 



ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS
    
    
    3ARTICLE 2. SECURITIES INVESTMENT AND CONSULTANCY INFORMATION AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT
    
    
    3ARTICLE 3. TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICE FEE
    
    
    4ARTICLE 4. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
    
    
    4ARTICLE 5. CONFIDENTIALITY
    
    
    4ARTICLE 6. GOVERNING LAW AND EVENTS OF DEFAULT
    
    
    4ARTICLE 7. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
    
    
    5ARTICLE 8. EFFECTIVENESS
    
    
    5ARTICLE 9. NO SUBSEQUENT OBLIGATION
    
    
    5ARTICLE 10. TRANSFER LIMITATION
    
    
    5ARTICLE 11. AMENDMENT
    
    
    5ARTICLE 12. COUNTERPARTS
    
    
    5ARTICLE 13. MISCELLANEOUS
    
    
    5EXHIBIT 1 CONTENT OF THE TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES
    
    
    7EXHIBIT 2 TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICE FEE
    
    
    8




---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



#####
#### William Goldstein, appellee, v. Burton Auto Spring Manufacturing Company et al., appellants.

Gen. No. 28,695.

Interlocutory injunction against disposing of business of a corporation and a copartnership; from managing or operating them; and from appropriating any of the property, until further order of court. (Final relief prayed as for discovery and accounting.) Interlocutory injunction granted. Interlocutory appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Hugo M. Friend, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the October term,- 1923.

Reversed.

Opinion filed November 27, 1923.

E. A. Zimmerman, for appellants; Arthur J. Bhutan, of counsel. Stein, Mayer *&*David, for appellee; Sigmund W. David and W. S. Hefferan, Jr., of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________

NO. 09-16-00179-CR

NO. 09-16-00180-CR

________________

MOSHEER HUSSEIN RASHID, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 9th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause Nos. 15-07-06714-CR, 15-07-06789-CR

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Mosheer Hussein Rashid has filed a motion to dismiss his appeals. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 42.2. A request to dismiss the appeals is signed by appellant personally 

and joined by counsel of record. No opinion has issued in these appeals. The 

motion is granted, and the appeals are therefore dismissed.
2

APPEALS DISMISSED.

________________________________

 CHARLES KREGER 

 Justice

Submitted on July 26, 2016

Opinion Delivered July 27, 2016

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 94-20392 Summary Calendar

__________________ LUTHER YOUNG. JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JAMES E. COOK; HAROLD D. BELL; STEPHEN KELLEY, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CA-H-92-695

- - - - - - - - - - May 3, 1996 Before GARWOOD, WIENER and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Luther Young, Jr., appeals from the district court's dismissal of his civil rights complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Young has filed with this court a request to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. Young argues that he was ordered to turn out for work without his prescription shoes, thus causing him pain; that the evidence was insufficientNo. 94-20392 -2- to support his disciplinary convictions; that he was retaliated against for filing administrative grievances; that he was denied access to legal materials; and that he should have been given an opportunity to amend his complaint. After a review of the record, we conclude that Young has not demonstrated that he will present a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. Accordingly, Young's motion to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED and the appeal is
DISMISSED. See Carson v. Polley , 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
### SUBCHAPTER III—AVIATION DEVELOPMENT STREAMLINING
|  | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company. |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                October 8, 2008 |                                                                       |                                  |
|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                            |                                                                  |                             |
|                                 | By:                                                              | /s/ Paul                Morrison |
|                                 | Paul                Morrison                                               |
|                                 | Principal                Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer |

----
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, et al., )

 )

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Case No.: 1:09-cv-00089-CKK

) 

LISA P. JACKSON, Administrator, )

United States Environmental Protection Agency, )

) 

Defendant. ) 

 )

SECOND STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES TO MODIFY CONSENT DECREE

WHEREAS, on February 5, 2010, the Court entered a Consent Decree in this matter,

which set forth January 31, 2011, as the date by which EPA would issue various proposed rules

and/or determinations, and November 30, 2011, as the date by which EPA would issue various

final rules and/or determinations pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 7411(b)(1)(B), 7412(d)(6), and

7412(f)(2); see Docket Entry 25, paragraphs 3-8; 

WHEREAS, on January 25, 2011, the parties filed a stipulation of modification extending

EPA’s time to issue the proposed rules and/or determinations from January 31, 2011, to April 29,

2011; see Docket Entry 26; 

WHEREAS, the Consent Decree allows for modification of any provision of the Consent

Decree by written stipulation of the Parties with notice to the Court, see Docket Entry 25, 

paragraph 10(a);

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate as follows:

1. EPA is no longer required to perform the actions discussed in paragraphs 3-5 of

the Consent Decree and the January 25, 2011, Stipulation by April 29, 2011. 

Case 1:09-cv-00089-CKK Document 27 Filed 04/27/11 Page 1 of 2
2

2. Instead, EPA must perform such actions no later than July 28, 2011. 

3. EPA is no longer required to perform the actions discussed in paragraphs 6-8 of

the Consent Decree by November 30, 2011.

4. Instead, EPA must perform such actions no later than February 28, 2012.

5. With the exception of the above-stated modifications, no other provision of the

Consent Decree has been modified.

SO AGREED:

FOR PLAINTIFFS

/s/ Michael Freeman

Michael Freeman

Earthjustice

1400 Glenarm Place, Suite 300

Denver, CO 80202

Tel: (303) 623-9466

Fax: (303) 623-8083

mfreeman@earthjustice.org

FOR DEFENDANT IGNACIA S. MORENO

Assistant Attorney General

/s/ Stephanie J. Talbert 

Stephanie Talbert

U.S. Department of Justice

Environment & Natural Resources Division

Environmental Defense Section

P.O. Box 23986

Washington, DC 20026-3986

Phone (202) 514-2617

Fax (202) 514-8865

stephanie.talbert@usdoj.gov

DATED: April 27, 2011

Case 1:09-cv-00089-CKK Document 27 Filed 04/27/11 Page 2 of 2
### **CHAPTER 55—INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL

Sec.
5501.
National Intermodal Transportation System policy.
[5502.
Repealed.]
[5503.
Repealed.]
5504.
Model intermodal transportation plans.
5505.
University transportation centers program.
5506.
Advanced transportation research initiative.
5507.
Transportation workforce outreach program.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—TERMINALS

5561.
Definition.
5562.
Assistance projects.
5563.
Conversion of certain rail passenger terminals.
5564.
Interim preservation of certain rail passenger terminals.
5565.
Encouraging the development of plans for converting certain rail passenger terminals.
5566.
Records and audits.
5567.
Preference for preserving buildings of historic or architectural significance.
5568.
Authorization of appropriations.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2021**—Pub. L. 117–58, div. B, title V, §§25013(b), 25020(c)(2), 25021(b), Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 869, 878, which directed amendment of analysis for subchapter I of this chapter by striking out item 5502 "Intermodal Transportation Advisory Board" and adding items 5506 and 5507 at the end, was executed to analysis for this chapter to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

**2015**—Pub. L. 114–94, div. A, title VI, §6015(b), Dec. 4, 2015, 129 Stat. 1571, struck out item 5503 "Office of Intermodalism".

**2012**—Pub. L. 112–141, div. E, title II, §§52009(b), 52010(b), July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 887, added item 5505, struck out former item 5505 "National university transportation centers", and struck out item 5506 "University transportation research".

**2005**—Pub. L. 109–59, title V, §§5401(c), 5402(c), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1815, 1820, substituted "National university transportation centers" for "University transportation research" in item 5505 and "University transportation research" for "Advanced vehicle technologies program" in item 5506.

**1998**—Pub. L. 105–178, title V, §§5110(b), 5111(b), June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 444, 445, added items 5505 and 5506.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-13-000517- CV
Travis County S heriff

Gr eg Ham ilton, Travis Cou nty Sh eriffs Of fi ce M ajor D arre n Lon g, and T ravis County, Appellan ts

v.
Justin T helen, Appellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 201 ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-1 3-0 0125 8, H ONO RAB LE P AUL R. DAVIS, J UDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to abate this appea l. Appellants state that
an abate ment should be g rante d so that the district c ourt may corr ect a proce dural issue that would potentially prec lude this Court from ad d re s s i n g the merits of this appea l. I n the interest of
conser ving judicial resour ces, we g rant the motion and abate the appea l. All appellate deadlines will be tolled during the period of abate ment. Absent further order of this Court, the appea l will automatically reinstate on J anuar y 21, 2014. The parties are direc ted to file either a status repor t or a motion to dism iss by

that date.____________________________________ Scott K. Field, Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pemberton a nd Field Abated Filed: Nove mber 21, 2013

2
#### KEMP v. KEMP et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 24, 1905.)

Action by Arthur T. Kemp against Arthur T. Kemp and another. No opinion. Motion denied.
### **CHAPTER 14—TRUST TERRITORY OF THE PACIFIC ISLANDS**

Sec.
1681.
Continuance of civil government for Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands; assistance programs; maximum fiscal year costs; reimbursement.
1681a.
Appointment of High Commissioner.
1681b.
Transfer of functions from government comptroller for Guam to Inspector General, Department of the Interior.
1681c, 1682. Repealed or Omitted.
1683.
Auditing of transactions of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands.
1684.
Expenditure of funds for administration of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands.
1685.
Transfer of property or money for administration of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands.
1686, 1687. Omitted.
1688.
Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands Economic Development Loan Fund.
1689.
Plan for use of grant to Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands Economic Development Loan Fund; loans; terms.
1690.
Loans from Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands Economic Loan Fund; restrictions; guarantees.
1691.
Fiscal control and accounting procedures for plan for use of grant.
1692.
Comprehensive annual financial report by chief executives of governments of the Marshall Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Palau, and Northern Mariana Islands; contents; other reports.
1693.
Audit of government; access to books, records, etc.
1694 to 1694e. Transferred.
1695.
Federal education and health care programs; nonapplicability or nonparticipation.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands

The Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, which included the Northern Mariana Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, the Marshall Islands, and Palau, terminated. The Trusteeship Agreement terminated with respect to the Republic of the Marshall Islands on Oct. 21, 1986, with respect to the Federated States of Micronesia and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands on Nov. 3, 1986, and with respect to the Republic of Palau on Oct. 1, 1994. See Proc. No. 5564, Nov. 3, 1986, 51 F.R. 40399, set out as a note under section 1801 of this title, and Proc. No. 6726, Sept. 27, 1994, 59 F.R. 49777, set out as a note under section 1931 of this title.

For provisions relating to the Northern Mariana Islands, formerly set out as notes under section 1681 of this title, see chapter 17 (§1801 et seq.) of this title. For provisions relating to the Federated States of Micronesia, the Marshall Islands, and Palau, formerly set out as notes under section 1681 of this title, see chapter 18 (§1901 et seq.) of this title.