alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 570.502 Applicability of uniform administrative requirements. ( a ) Grantees and subrecipients shall comply with 2 CFR part 200, “Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards”, except that: ( 1 ) Section 200.305 “Payment” is modified for lump sum drawdown for financing of property rehabilitation activities, in accordance with § 570.513.
( 2 ) Section 200.306 “Cost sharing or matching” does not apply.
( 3 ) Section 200.307 “Program income” does not apply. Program income is governed by § 570.504.
( 4 ) Section 200.308 “Revisions of budget and program plans” does not apply.
( 5 ) Section 200.311 “Real property” does not apply, except as provided in § 570.200(j). Real property is governed by § 570.505.
( 6 ) Section 200.313 “Equipment” applies, except that when the equipment is sold, the proceeds shall be program income. Equipment not needed by the subrecipient for CDBG activities shall be transferred to the recipient for the CDBG program or shall be retained after compensating the recipient.
( 7 ) Section 200.333 “Retention requirements for records” applies except that: ( i ) For recipients: ( A ) The period shall be 4 years from the date of execution of the closeout agreement for a grant, as further described in this part;
( B ) Records for individual activities subject to the reversion of assets provisions at § 570.503(b)(7) or the change of use provisions at § 570.505 must be maintained for 3 years after those provisions no longer apply to the activity;
( C ) Records for individual activities for which there are outstanding loan balances, other receivables, or contingent liabilities must be retained for 3 years after the receivables or liabilities have been satisfied.
( ii ) For subrecipients: ( A ) The retention period for individual CDBG activities shall be the longer of 3 years after the expiration or termination of the subrecipient agreement under § 570.503, or 3 years after the submission of the annual performance and evaluation report, as prescribed in § 91.520 of this title, in which the specific activity is reported on for the final time;
( B ) Records for individual activities subject to the reversion of assets provisions at § 570.503(b)(7) or change of use provisions at § 570.505 must be maintained for as long as those provisions continue to apply to the activity; and
( C ) Records for individual activities for which there are outstanding loan balances, other receivables, or contingent liabilities must be retained until such receivables or liabilities have been satisfied.
( 8 ) Section 200.343 “Closeout” applies to closeout of subrecipients.
( b ) [Reserved]
[80 FR 75937, Dec. 7, 2015]
### §12114. Recreational endorsement

(a) Requirements.—A recreational endorsement may be issued for a vessel that satisfies the requirements of section 12103 of this title.

(b) Authorized Activity.—A vessel operating under a recreational endorsement may be operated only for pleasure.

(c) Application of Customs Laws.—A vessel for which a recreational endorsement is issued may proceed between a port of the United States and a port of a foreign country without entering or clearing with the Secretary of Homeland Security. However, a recreational vessel is subject to the requirements for reporting arrivals under section 433 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1433), and individuals on the vessel are subject to applicable customs regulations.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §5, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1498.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 12114(a) | 46:12109(a). | |
| 12114(b) | 46:12109(c). | |
| | 46:12110(c). | |
| 12114(c) | 46:12109(b). | |

Section

In subsection (c), the words "Secretary of Homeland Security" are substituted for "Customs Service" because the functions of the Customs Service and of the Secretary of the Treasury relating thereto were transferred to the Secretary of Homeland Security by section 403(1) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107–296, 116 Stat. 2178).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 12114, Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 589; Pub. L. 99–36, §1(a)(8), May 15, 1985, 99 Stat. 67, originally derived from section 65c of former Title 46, Shipping, related to home ports, prior to being repealed by Pub. L. 100–710, title I, §§106(b)(5), 107(a), Nov. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 4752, effective Jan. 1, 1989.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Documentation of Recreational Vessels

Pub. L. 115–282, title VIII, §826, Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4314, provided that: "Coast Guard personnel performing nonrecreational vessel documentation functions under subchapter II of chapter 121 of title 46, United States Code, may perform recreational vessel documentation under section 12114 of such title in any fiscal year in which—

"(1) funds available for Coast Guard operating expenses may not be used for expenses incurred for recreational vessel documentation;

"(2) fees collected from owners of yachts and credited to such use are insufficient to pay expenses of recreational vessel documentation; and

"(3) there is a backlog of applications for recreational vessel documentation."
|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                  November 1,                  2007 |                                                                         |                                         |
|----------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                                                     |                                                                         |
|                                                |                                                                    |                                    |
|                                                     | By:                                                                | /s/ Christopher                Phillips |
|                                                     | Christopher                Phillips                                          |
|                                                     | Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial                  Officer |
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.295 When must I revise my DWOP?

You must revise either the Conceptual Plan or your DWOP to reflect changes in your development project that materially alter the facilities, equipment, and systems described in your plan. You must submit the revision within 60 days after any material change to the information required for that part of your plan.
Editorial Note on Part 982
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999, and at 89 FR 38293, May 7, 2024.

§ 982.204 Waiting list: Administration of waiting list. ( a ) *Admission from waiting list.* Except for special admissions, participants must be selected from the PHA waiting list. The PHA must select participants from the waiting list in accordance with admission policies in the PHA Administrative Plan.
( b ) *Organization of waiting list.* The PHA must maintain information that permits the PHA to select participants from the waiting list in accordance with the PHA admission policies. The waiting list must contain the following information for each applicant listed: ( 1 ) Applicant name;
( 2 ) Family unit size (number of bedrooms for which family qualifies under PHA occupancy standards);
( 3 ) Date and time of application;
( 4 ) Qualification for any local preference;
( 5 ) Racial or ethnic designation of the head of household.
( c ) *Removing applicant names from the waiting list.* ( 1 ) The PHA Administrative Plan must state PHA policy on when applicant names may be removed from the waiting list. The policy may provide that the PHA will remove names of applicants who do not respond to PHA requests for information or updates.
( 2 ) An PHA decision to withdraw from the waiting list the name of an applicant family that includes a person with disabilities is subject to reasonable accommodation in accordance with 24 CFR part 8. If the applicant did not respond to the PHA request for information or updates because of the family member's disability, the PHA must reinstate the applicant in the family's former position on the waiting list.
( d ) *Family size.* ( 1 ) The order of admission from the waiting list may not be based on family size, or on the family unit size for which the family qualifies under the PHA occupancy policy.
( 2 ) If the PHA does not have sufficient funds to subsidize the family unit size of the family at the top of the waiting list, the PHA may not skip the top family to admit an applicant with a smaller family unit size. Instead, the family at the top of the waiting list will be admitted when sufficient funds are available.
( e ) *Funding for specified category of waiting list families.* When HUD awards an PHA program funding for a specified category of families on the waiting list, the PHA must select applicant families in the specified category.
( f ) *Number of waiting lists.* A PHA must use a single waiting list for admission to its Section 8 tenant-based assistance program. However, the PHA may use a separate single waiting list for such admissions for a county or municipality.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under OMB control number 2577-0169) [59 FR 36682, July 18, 1994, as amended at 60 FR 34717, July 3, 1995; 63 FR 23860, Apr. 30, 1998; 64 FR 26643, May 14, 1999; 65 FR 16821, Mar. 30, 2000]
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1901 What is the goal of my SEMS program? The goal of your SEMS program is to promote safety and environmental protection by ensuring all personnel aboard a facility are complying with the policies and procedures identified in your SEMS. ( a ) To accomplish this goal, you must ensure that your SEMS program identifies, addresses, and manages safety, environmental hazards, and impacts during the design, construction, start-up, operation (including, but not limited to, drilling and decommissioning), inspection, and maintenance of all new and existing facilities, including mobile offshore drilling units (MODUs) when attached to the seabed and Department of the Interior (DOI) regulated pipelines.
( b ) All personnel involved with your SEMS program must be trained to have the skills and knowledge to perform their assigned duties.
[76 FR 64462, Oct. 18, 2011, as amended at 78 FR 20440, Apr. 5, 2013]
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.434 What are the recordkeeping requirements for diverter actuations and tests? You must record the time, date, and results of all diverter actuations and tests in the driller's report. In addition, you must: ( a ) Record the diverter pressure test on a pressure chart;
( b ) Require your onsite representative to sign and date the pressure test chart;
( c ) Identify the control station used during the test or actuation;
( d ) Identify problems or irregularities observed during the testing or actuations and record actions taken to remedy the problems or irregularities; and
( e ) Retain all pressure charts and reports pertaining to the diverter tests and actuations at the facility for the duration of drilling the well.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-

OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Firearms Training Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronavan Mohling, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/S/ Ronavan Mohling                   
|Ronavan Mohling                       
|Chairman of the Board of Directors and
|Chief Executive Officer               
|November 15, 2004
#### Dongan Construction Corp., Appellant, v R. O. D. Land Developers, Inc., Sued Herein as R. O. D. Development, Respondent, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) R. O. D. Land Developers, Inc., Respondent, v Dongan Construction Corp., Appellant, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 2.)

In actions by the purchaser of real property, *inter alia,*to rescind the contract of sale (Action No. 1) and by the seller of the said property, R. O. D. Land Developers, Inc. (R. O. D.), to foreclose the purchase-money mortgage thereon (Action No. 2), the purchaser appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, both dated September 13, 1977, the first of which, in Action No. 1, granted summary judgment to R. O. D. and dismissed the complaint as against it, and the second of which, in Action No. 2, *inter alia,*granted summary judgment to R. O. D. and appointed a receiver. Orders reversed, on the law, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements, motions for summary judgment denied and the appointment of a receiver is vacated. On this record, there are questions of fact which preclude the granting of summary judgment to the respondent seller (see *Todd v Pearl Woods, Inc.,*20 AD2d 911, affd 15 NY2d 817; *Forest Bay Homes v Kosinski,*50 AD2d 829; *Arena v Hegyhaty,*30 AD2d 808; *Grasso v De Melik,*114 NYS2d 884; see, also, *Galgani v Fleming,*56 AD2d 644). Suozzi, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
### §1423g. Vacancies

Vacancies occurring in the legislature shall be filled as the legislature shall provide, except that no person filling a vacancy shall hold office longer than for the remainder of the term for which his predecessor was elected.

(Aug. 1, 1950, ch. 512, §17, 64 Stat. 388.)
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3234 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,3-Dimethyl-2- 

imidazolidinone. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 12, 2005 

Mr. BUYER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,3-Dimethyl2-imidazolidinone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1,3-DIMETHYL-2-IMIDAZOLIDINONE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.29.26 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 1,3-Dimethyl-2-imidazolidinone) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 3234 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1743 How do I certify that a site is clear of obstructions? ( a ) For a well site, you must submit to the appropriate District Manager within 30 days after you complete the verification activities a form BSEE-0124, Application for Permit to Modify, to include the following information: ( 1 ) A signed certification that the well site area is cleared of all obstructions;
( 2 ) The date the verification work was performed and the vessel used;
( 3 ) The extent of the area surveyed;
( 4 ) The survey method used;
( 5 ) The results of the survey, including a list of any debris removed or a statement from the trawling contractor that no objects were recovered; and
( 6 ) A post-trawling job plot or map showing the trawled area.
( b ) For a platform or other facility site, you must submit the following information to the appropriate Regional Supervisor within 30 days after you complete the verification activities: ( 1 ) A letter signed by an authorized company official certifying that the platform or other facility site area is cleared of all obstructions and that a company representative witnessed the verification activities;
( 2 ) A letter signed by an authorized official of the company that performed the verification work for you certifying that it cleared the platform or other facility site area of all obstructions;
( 3 ) The date the verification work was performed and the vessel used;
( 4 ) The extent of the area surveyed;
( 5 ) The survey method used;
( 6 ) The results of the survey, including a list of any debris removed or a statement from the trawling contractor that no objects were recovered; and
( 7 ) A post-trawling job plot or map showing the trawled area.
### §2175. Role and capacity of Oversight Board

#### (a) Actions of Oversight Board

For the purposes of this subchapter, the Oversight Board may take any action necessary on behalf of the debtor to prosecute the case of the debtor, including—

(1) filing a petition under section 2164 of this title;

(2) submitting or modifying a plan of adjustment under sections 2172 and 2173 of this title; or

(3) otherwise generally submitting filings in relation to the case with the court.

#### (b) Representative of debtor

The Oversight Board in a case under this subchapter is the representative of the debtor.

(Pub. L. 114–187, title III, §315, June 30, 2016, 130 Stat. 584.)
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1830 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 96 ) IV-C-6

2 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:20:56

AM Sheet 96 of 232P. 2

v T_< * 

## * A r 

## -5T-G-6 Z

UNITED STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON

, D.C. 2046 0 

### FE B 

### 9 198

8

OFFIC E O F AI RAN D RADIATIO N Honorabl e Fran

k J . Guarin i Hous e o f Representative s Washington , D . C . 2051 5 Dea r Mr . Guarini : Thank yo u fo r you r lette r o f January26 , 1988 , expressing you r view s o n EPA' s propose d regulation s t o contro l vapor s generate d during the refueling o f moto r vehicle s b yth e us e o f onboar d canisters . Thi s proposa l involve s comple x an d controversia l issues , an d we hav e spen t a grea t dea l o f tim e analyzing th e environ
menta l an

d economi c impacts . W e hel d a publi c hearing o n th e proposa l thi s pas t October , an d w e expec t t o receiv e man y additiona l comment s b ythe tim

e the commen t perio d close s o n Februar y11 , 1988 . Acop yo f you r lette r wil l b e place d i n the publi c docke t fo r thi s rulemaking , an d we d o than

k yo u fo r takin

g the tim

e t o commen t o n thi s importan t issue .

Sincerel yyours ,
„. ,-.- . ^'.y-j^', \J~ Richar d D . Wilso n Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s cc : Docke t A-87-1 1
**Exhibit
      23.1**







**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
      Form
      S-8 (No. 333-123487) of Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. of our reports dated
      June
      10, 2006 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule,
      management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
      reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
      of
      Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. (successor basis); and dated June 10, 2006
      relating to the combined financial statements and financial statement schedule
      of Medtech Holdings, Inc. and The Denorex Company (predecessor basis); all
      of
      which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.









**/s/
      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP**




Salt
      Lake
      City, Utah


June
      12,
      2006
#### Stanford A. Wisdom, Jr., an Infant, by His Guardian ad Litem, Stanford A. Wisdom, Respondent, et al., Plaintiff, v. Mildred E. Jackson, Appellant.

Order, entered on January 3, 1963, to the extent it granted infant plaintiff’s post-trial motion to set aside verdict awarded infant .plaintiff as inadequate and ordered new trial of infant plaintiff’s cause of action unless defendant stipulated to increase verdict to $7,500, in which event motion was denied, unanimously reversed on the law and on the facts, without costs, otherwise it is affirmed, the motion is denied, without costs, the jury verdict is reinstated and judgment is directed to be entered thereon. The seven-year-old plaintiff was awarded $2,800 for personal injuries sustained when hit by defendant’s automobile. The infant’s father was awarded $2,011 for expenses and loss of his son’s services. The father had incurred $811.10 in medical expenses to the date of trial. The medical witness for defendant testified that the residue of the injuries sustained was of no significance. The record contains some corroboration for this view, including a few statements in the hospital records introduced which indicated exclusively minor injuries. Though this evidence was contradicted, the jury could have favored defendant’s version. Moreover, there is nothing necessarily inconsistent between the awards to the son of $2,800 for his suffering and disability and to the father for $811.10 in medical expenses plus about $1,200 for loss of services and possibly other expenses. Under the circumstances, the motion to set aside the verdict should have been denied (e.g., *Bogeau*v. *Tutino,*18 A D 2d 614; cf. *Laranjo*v. *Malik,*11 A D 2d 863; *Coleman*v. *Brooklyn & Queens Tr. Corp.,*252 App. Div. 215, 216). The infant plaintiff’s post-trial motion for reargument of the denial to set aside the verdict for inadequacy was timely (see CPLR, § 2211, rule 4405; Civ. Prac. Act, § 113; Rules Civ. Prae., rule 60-a). Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER OF TRAMMELL CROW COMPANYPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

In connection with the accompanying report onForm 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 and filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, DerekR. McClain, Chief Financial Officer of Trammell Crow Company (the “Company”),hereby certify that:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        |   | /s/ Derek R. McClain    |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Name: Derek R.  McClain |
|   |   | Date: August 9,  2004   |

 

----