alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 285.705 When must I use a Certified Verification Agent (CVA)? ( a ) Unless BSEE waives this requirement under paragraph (c) of this section, you must use one or more CVAs to review and verify your FDRs, FIRs, and the Project Modification and Repair Reports.
( b ) The purpose of a CVA is to: ( 1 ) Ensure that your facilities are designed, fabricated, and installed in conformance with accepted engineering practices and the FDR(s) and FIR(s); and that the design of the facilities is suitable for the location where they will be installed;
( 2 ) Ensure Critical Safety Systems and Equipment are commissioned in accordance with the procedures identified in § 285.702(a)(8);
( 3 ) Ensure that major repairs and major modifications are completed in conformance with accepted engineering practices; and
( 4 ) Provide BSEE and you with reports of all incidents that affect the facility design, fabrication, and installation, including commissioning of Critical Safety Systems and Equipment, for the project and its components.
( c ) BSEE may waive in whole or in part the requirement that you use a CVA if you can demonstrate the following: If you demonstrate that . . .
Then BSEE may waive the requirement for a CVA for the following: (1) The facility design conforms to a standard design that has been used successfully in a similar environment, and the installation design conforms to accepted engineering practices
The design of your structure(s). (2) The relevant fabricator has successfully fabricated similar facilities, and the facility will be fabricated in conformance with accepted engineering practices and to a nationally or internationally recognized quality assurance standard
The fabrication of your structure(s). (3) The installation company has successfully installed similar facilities in a similar offshore environment, and your structures will be installed in conformance with accepted engineering practices
The installation of your structure(s). (4) Major repairs or major modifications will be completed in conformance with accepted engineering practices and to a nationally or internationally recognized quality assurance standard
The major repair or major modification on your structure(s).
( d ) You must submit a request to waive, in whole or in part, the requirement to use a CVA to BSEE in writing. ( 1 ) BSEE will review your request to waive, in whole or in part, the use of the CVA and notify you of its decision.
( 2 ) If BSEE does not waive, in whole or in part, the requirement for a CVA, you may file an appeal under § 285.118.
( 3 ) If BSEE waives, in whole or in part, the requirement that you use a CVA, your project engineer must perform the same duties and responsibilities as would have the CVA, except as otherwise provided. You must submit the project engineer's qualifications to BSEE as a part of your waiver request to demonstrate that your project engineer is a professional engineer with relevant experience and expertise in the facilities they will be verifying/certifying.
[89 FR 42717, May 15, 2024]
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 22, 2019

NO. 03-18-00758-CR

Ex parte Jordan Graham Bice

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND KELLY

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order denying appellant’s application for writ of habeas 

corpus. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was 

no reversible error in the order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order denying 

appellant’s application for writ of habeas corpus. Because appellant is indigent and unable to 

pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles E. Alston, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County *1021Court, Dutchess County, rendered November 1, 1976, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. While the testimony of the witness Danielson was erroneously admitted, it was of little consequence and took up only 13 pages of the 1,500-page transcript. It is inconceivable that its admission in any way influenced the jury to return the verdict that it did in view of the totality of the evidence, which clearly established defendant’s guilt. Hopkins, J. P., Martuscello, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
### §867. Repealed. Pub. L. 90–274, §103(g), Mar. 27, 1968, 82 Stat. 63

Section, acts Mar. 2, 1917, ch. 145, §44, 39 Stat. 966; May 17, 1932, ch. 190, 47 Stat. 158, set out qualifications for jurors in District Court of United States for Puerto Rico as different from those set by local law and directed that juries be selected, drawn, and subject to exemption in accordance with laws of Congress insofar as locally applicable.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective 270 days after Mar. 27, 1968, except as to cases in which an indictment is returned or petit jury is empaneled prior to such effective date, see section 104 of Pub. L. 90–274, set out as an Effective Date of 1968 Amendment note under section 1861 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
EX-4.1




 Exhibit 4.1 

AMENDED AND RESTATED 

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION 

OF 
 TENNECO INC. 

November 17, 2022 
 FIRST: The name of this
corporation (the “Corporation”) shall be Tenneco Inc. 
 SECOND: Its registered office in the State of Delaware is to be located at
3411 Silverside Road, Tatnall Building Suite 104, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware 19801, United States, and the name of its registered agent at such address is Corporate Creations Network Inc. 

THIRD: The purpose or purposes of the Corporation shall be to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may be organized under the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”). 
 FOURTH: The total number of shares of stock which this Corporation
is authorized to issue is 1,000. All such shares are of one class and are shares of Common Stock with the par value of $0.01 per share. 
 FIFTH: The
Board of Directors shall have the power to adopt, amend or repeal the bylaws. 
 SIXTH: A director of the Corporation shall not be liable to the
Corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except to the extent such exemption from liability or limitation thereof is not permitted under the DGCL as the same exists or may hereafter be amended.
Any amendment, modification or repeal of the foregoing sentence shall not adversely affect any right or protection of a director of the Corporation hereunder in respect of any act or omission occurring prior to the time of such amendment,
modification or repeal. 
 SEVENTH: To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the Corporation is authorized to provide indemnification of
(and advancement of expenses to) the directors, officers, employees and agents of the Corporation through bylaw provisions, agreements with such directors, officers, employees and agents, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise,
in excess of the indemnification and advancement otherwise permitted by Section 145 of the DGCL. 
 Any amendment, repeal or modification of the
foregoing provisions of this Article Seventh shall not adversely affect any right or protection of a director, officer, employee or agent existing at the time of any acts or omissions of such director, officer, employee or agent occurring prior to
such amendment, repeal or modification.
### §1422c. Executive agencies and instrumentalities

#### (a) Appointment of heads; establishment of merit system; Civil Service Commission

The Governor shall, except as otherwise provided in this chapter or the laws of Guam, appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the legislature, all heads of executive agencies and instrumentalities. The legislature shall establish a merit system and, as far as practicable, appointments and promotions shall be made in accordance with such merit system. The Government of Guam may by law establish a Civil Service Commission to administer the merit system. Members of the commission may be removed as provided by the laws of Guam.

#### (b) Powers and duties of officers

All officers shall have such powers and duties as may be conferred or imposed on them by law or by executive regulation of the Governor not inconsistent with any law.

#### (c) Reorganization

The Governor shall, from time to time, examine the organization of the executive branch of the government of Guam, and shall determine and carry out such changes therein as are necessary to promote effective management and to execute faithfully the purposes of this chapter and the laws of Guam.

#### (d) Continuation in office of incumbents

All persons holding office in Guam on August 1, 1950 may, except as otherwise provided in this chapter, continue to hold their respective offices until their successors are appointed and qualified.

(Aug. 1, 1950, ch. 512, §9, 64 Stat. 387; Pub. L. 90–497, §4, Sept. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 845; Pub. L. 99–396, §18(a), Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 843.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1986—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–396 inserted provisions authorizing establishment of Civil Service Commission and removal of commission members as provided by laws of Guam.

1968—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 90–497, §4(a), struck out requirement that, in making appointments, preference be given persons of Guamanian ancestry and that opportunities for higher education and use of service training facilities be provided to qualified persons of Guamanian ancestry.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 90–497, §4(b), struck out provision authorizing the Governor to appoint or remove any officer whose appointment or removal is not otherwise provided for.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1968 Amendment

Pub. L 90–497, §4(a), Sept. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 845, provided that the amendment made by such section 4(a) is effective on date of enactment of Pub. L. 90–497, which was approved on Sept. 11, 1968.

Amendment by Pub. L. 90–497 necessary to authorize the holding of an election for Governor and Lieutenant Governor on Nov. 3, 1970, effective Jan. 1, 1970, and all other amendments unless otherwise provided effective Jan. 4, 1971, see section 13 of Pub. L. 90–497, set out as a note under section 1422 of this title.
##### 



AMENDMENT NO. 4
TO THE
CEDAR SHOPPING CENTERS, INC.
SENIOR EXECUTIVE DEFERRED
COMPENSATION PLAN
     1.
    
    The following definition of Affected Participants is hereby added to Article II of the
Plan:
 Affected Participants
 2.
    
    The following definition of Code Section 409A is hereby added to Article II of the Plan:
 Code Section 409A




---



##### 



3.
    
    The definition of Unforeseeable Financial Emergency contained in Section 2.22 of the Plan
is hereby amended by adding the following sentence to the end thereof:
  4.
    
    Section 4.2 of the Plan is hereby renumbered as Section 4.2(a), and the following sentence is
hereby added to the end of Section 4.2(a) as follows:
  5.
    
    The following new Section 4.2(b) is hereby added to the Plan as follows:
  6.
    
    The following sentence is hereby added to the end of Section 4.3(a) of the Plan as follows:
  7.
    
    The following sentence is hereby added to the end of Section 4.3(b) of the Plan as follows:




---



##### 



8.
    
    The following sentence is hereby added to the end of Section 4.4 of the Plan as follows:
  9.
    
    The third sentence of Section 5.4 of the Plan is hereby amended to read in its entirety as
follows:
  10.
    
    Section 7.1 of the Plan is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:




---



##### 



11.
    
    Section 7.2 of the Plan is hereby renumbered as Section 7.2(a), and the following sentence is
hereby added to the end of Section 7.2(a) of the Plan as follows:
  12.
    
    The following new Section 7.2(b) is hereby added to the Plan as follows:
  13.
    
    Section 7.4 of the Plan is hereby renumbered as Section 7.4(a), and the following sentence is
hereby added to the end of Section 7.4(a) as follows:




---



##### 



14.
    
    The following new Section 7.4(b) is hereby added to the Plan as follows:
  15.
    
    The following new Section 7.5 is hereby added to the Plan as follows:
 Affected Participant Special Elections




---



##### 



16.
    
    This Amendment shall be effective as of December 21, 2006.17.
    
    Except to the extent hereinabove set forth, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
 st
 CEDAR SHOPPING CENTERS, INC.By:
    /s/ LEO S. ULLMANName:
    Leo S. UllmanTitle:
    President
Exhibit 32
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Radale Imports,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended June 30, 2005 (the
"Report"),  I, Lee D. Dodson,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  hereby
certify that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August 19, 2005

                                             /s/ Lee D. Dodson
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Lee D. Dodson
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


         The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350) and is not being filed as
part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 AND
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
   In
connection with this Annual Report of Equity Ventures Group, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Colette Kim, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:
  1.
              Such
      Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31,
      2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  2.
              The
      information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for
      the period ending December 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of Equity Ventures Group, Inc.
  By: /s/Colette
Kim
 Colette
Kim,
 President,
Chief Executive Officer,
 Chief
Financial Officer, Secretary &
 Director
  January
16, 2009
### Part C—Deregulation and Other Statutory Changes
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Adelard B. Jean, Appellant, v. J. Edwin La Vallee, as Warden of Clinton Prison, Respondent.

Motion for leave to prosecute appeal as a poor person granted. The appeal may be perfected upon one typewritten copy of the record and five typewritten copies of the brief. Motion for assignment of counsel denied.
Order entered Se p tember 30 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00299
- CR
KENNETH ALLEMAN MIDG LEY, II, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal fro m the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 366
- 82836
- 2017



### O RDER
Before the Court are appellant’s September 25, 2019 motion for pro se access to the
record , his September 27, 2019 motion for pro se access to transcripts of the audio and video portions of the record on appeal, and separate September 27, 2019 motion s for pro se access to the competency evaluation reports prepared by Kristi Compton, M.D. and Randall Price, M.D.
All four motions relate to appellant’s prepara tion of a pro se response to counsel’s Anders brief. By order entered August 30, 2019, the Court directed counsel to provide appellant with a copy of the record and file verification of her compliance with the Court within thirty days. On September 9, 201 9, the Court received counsel’s verification showing she had mailed the record to appellant and that it was delivered to the facility where he is detained on September 9, 2019

. We note that in a letter accompanying his motions, appellant states he received the record.Because appellant has already received the record, we DENY AS MOOT appellant’s motion for

pro se access to the record. In his motion for pro se access to transcripts of the audio and video portions of the record, appellant contends he has no m eans to view the audio and video evidence counsel sent him on a compact disc. He requests that a paper transcript be created of the contents of the disc. Appellant’s motion for a paper transcript of the audio and video evidence is DENIED

. In his motion s se eking cop ies of competency evaluation reports by Dr. Compton and Dr. Price , appellant contends the reports are missing from the reporter’s record. Although the competency reports were discussed during appellant’s plea hearing, it appears to the Court that neither report was admitted into evidence. The Court DENIES appellant’s motions seeking copies of Dr. Compton’s and Dr. Price’s reports from the reporter’s record. A copy of Dr. Compton’s report appears in the clerk’s record at pages 400

– 409. T he Court is transmitting a paper copy of Dr. Compton’s report with appellant’s copy of this order. As reflected in this Court’s order of August 30, 2019, appellant’s pro se response is due by November 1, 2019

. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to transmit a copy of th is order, by electronic transmission, to counsel for the parties. We further DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order and a copy of Dr. Compton’s competency evaluation appearing at pages 400

– 09 of the clerk’s record , by first class mail, to Kenneth Al leman Midgley II; TDCJ N o. 02252631; Allred Unit; 2101 FM 369 North; Iowa Park, Texas 76367.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Pierce Johnson, Appellant.

Consolidated appeals by defendant: (1) from a judg*961ment of the County Court, Kings County, rendered June 12, 1961 on his plea of guilty, convicting him of bribery, and sentencing him as a second felony offender to serve a term of five to seven years; and (2) from an order, entered January 19, 1962, denying his motion to vacate said judgment of conviction. Judgment and order affirmed. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Rabin, J J., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tumbleweed Communications Corp. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Timothy G. Conley, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 7, 2007



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ TIMOTHY G. CONLEY                                       
|Timothy G. Conley                                           
|Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial
Officer
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2597 

To suspend temporarily the duty on suspension system stabilizer bars. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2005 

Mr. REICHERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on suspension system 

stabilizer bars. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION SYSTEM STABILIZER BARS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 
2 

•HR 2597 IH 

‘‘ 9902.87.08 Suspension system stabilizer 

bars of alloy steel of Japan 

JIS grade SCM525S 

(26CrMo4) or SCM435H 

(34CrMo4), each weighing 

approximately 42 kg, comprising one rod measuring 

approximately 98.8 cm in 

length at each end of which 

is welded at approximately 

right angles to a rod measuring approximately 51 cm 

in length (provided for in 

subheading 8708.99.70), the 

foregoing designed for use in 

Class 7 and 8 trucks only .... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### J. M. Kerstein, appellee, v. Scovill Manufacturing Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 28,505.

Complaint for unlawfully withholding possession of premises. Judgment for possession. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. F. J. Campbell, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed October 2, 1923.

Rehearing denied October 15, 1923.

*Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

John A. Bussian, for appellant. Weissenbach, Hartman & Craig and Harry Okin, for appellee; Harry Okin, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.
### **CHAPTER 159—ENFORCEMENT: INVESTIGATIONS, RIGHTS, AND REMEDIES**

Sec.
15901.
General authority.
15902.
Enforcement by the Board.
15903.
Enforcement by the Attorney General.
15904.
Rights and remedies of persons injured by pipeline carriers.
15905.
Limitation on actions by and against pipeline carriers.
15906.
Liability of pipeline carriers under receipts and bills of lading.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1998**—Pub. L. 105–225, §7(d), Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1512, made technical amendment to directory language of Pub. L. 104–287, §5(45)(A), effective Oct. 11, 1996. See 1996 Amendment note below.

**1997**—Pub. L. 105–102, §3(d)(1)(A), Nov. 20, 1997, 111 Stat. 2215, which directed technical correction of directory language of Pub. L. 104–287, §5(45)(A), by substituting "ENFORCEMENT:" for "ENFORCEMENT,", could not be executed because "ENFORCEMENT," does not appear in section 5(45)(A).

Pub. L. 105–102, §2(14), Nov. 20, 1997, 111 Stat. 2205, substituted "pipeline" for "certain" in item 15904.

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–287, §5(45)(B), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3393, struck out item 15907 "Liability when property is delivered in violation of routing instructions".

Pub. L. 104–287, §5(45)(A), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3393, as amended by Pub. L. 105–225, struck out duplicative chapter heading.