alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 1206
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1206 (formerly part 206) appear at 67 FR 19111, Apr. 18, 2002.

§ 1206.460 Transportation allowances—general. ( a ) For ad valorem leases subject to § 1206.456, where the value for royalty purposes has been determined at a point remote from the lease or mine, ONRR shall, as authorized by this section, allow a deduction in determining value for royalty purposes for the reasonable, actual costs incurred to: ( 1 ) Transport the coal from an Indian lease to a sales point which is remote from both the lease and mine; or
( 2 ) Transport the coal from an Indian lease to a wash plant when that plant is remote from both the lease and mine and, if applicable, from the wash plant to a remote sales point. In-mine transportation costs shall not be included in the transportation allowance.
( b ) Under no circumstances will the authorized washing allowance and the transportation allowance reduce the value for royalty purposes to zero.
( c ) ( 1 ) When coal transported from a mine to a wash plant is eligible for a transportation allowance in accordance with this section, the lessee is not required to allocate transportation costs between the quantity of clean coal output and the rejected waste material. The transportation allowance shall be authorized for the total production which is transported. Transportation allowances shall be expressed as a cost per ton of cleaned coal transported.
( 2 ) For coal that is not washed at a wash plant, the transportation allowance shall be authorized for the total production which is transported. Transportation allowances shall be expressed as a cost per ton of coal transported.
( 3 ) Transportation costs shall only be recognized as allowances when the transported coal is sold and royalties are reported and paid.
( d ) If, after a review and/or audit, ONRR determines that a lessee has improperly determined a transportation allowance authorized by this section, then the lessee shall pay any additional royalties, plus interest, determined in accordance with § 1218.202 of this subchapter, or shall be entitled to a credit, without interest.
( e ) Lessees shall not disproportionately allocate transportation costs to Indian leases.
### §15103. Remedies as cumulative

Except as otherwise provided in this part, the remedies provided under this part are in addition to remedies existing under another law or common law.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §106(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 922.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 10103 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
### §1631. Establishment and maintenance; scope

The Governor shall establish and maintain systems of accounting and internal control designed to provide—

(a) full disclosure of the financial results of the government's activities;

(b) adequate financial information needed for the government's management purposes;

(c) effective control over and accountability for all funds, property, and other assets for which the government is responsible, including appropriate internal audit; and

(d) reliable accounting results to serve as the basis for preparation and support of the government's request for the approval of the President or his designated representative for the obligation and expenditure of the internal revenue collections as provided in section 26, the Governor's budget request to the legislature, and for controlling the execution of the said budget.

(July 22, 1954, ch. 558, §18, 68 Stat. 505.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 26, referred to in subsec. (d), probably means section 26 of S. 3378 (act July 22, 1954, ch. 558, 68 Stat. 497) prior to the submission of S. 3378 to the Conference Committee which redesignated section 26 as section 28 of S. 3378. Said section 28 was composed of subsecs. (a) to (d). Subsecs. (a), (c), and (d) thereof enacted sections 1642, 1643, and 1644 of this title, respectively. Subsec. (b) thereof added subsec. (c) to section 3350 of former Title 26, Internal Revenue Code. Reference to section 3350(c) of former Title 26 is deemed a reference to section 7652(b)(3) of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code. See section 7852(b) of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code, which provides that any reference in any other law to a provision of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 be deemed a reference to the corresponding provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Agreement Regarding Financial Accountability and Performance Standards

Pub. L. 106–84, §2, Oct. 28, 1999, 113 Stat. 1295, provided that:

"(a) In General.—The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to enter into an agreement with the Governor of the Virgin Islands establishing mutually agreed financial accountability and performance standards for the fiscal operations of the Government of the Virgin Islands.

"(b) Transmission to Congress.—Upon ratification of the agreement authorized in subsection (a) by both parties, the Secretary shall forward a copy of the agreement to the Committee on Resources [now Committee on Natural Resources] in the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources in the Senate."
EXHIBIT 99.3 -- Annual Statement of Compliance for the
                 year ended December 31, 2004



AURORA LOAN SERVICES
A Lehman Brothers Company


Via UPS

February 25, 2005


Diana Kenneally
U.S. Bank National Association
1 Federal Street, 3rd Floor
Boston, MA 02110



RE:     SASCO Series: 2003-20, 2003-25XS, 2003-32, 2003-GEL1, 2003-39EX,
        2004-3, 2004-6XS, 2004-GEL1, 2004-10, 2004-GEL2, 2004-NP1,
        2004-17XS, 2004-GEL3, 2004-S4, 2004-NP2, AMT 2003-1, FAMLT 2004-1
        Annual Officer's Certificate as to Compliance

Dear Ms. Kenneally:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the period ending on
December 31, 2004:

1.      I have reviewed the activities and performance of the Master
        Servicer during the preceding calendar year under the terms of
        the Trust Agreements and to the best of this Officer's knowledge,
        the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its duties,
        responsibilities or obligations under the Agreements;

2.      Based on said review and to the best of this Officer's knowledge,
        the Master Servicer is not in default of its obligations under
        the terms of the Trust Agreements in any material respect, or, if
        there is a default in the fulfillment of its obligations, a
        description of each default or failure and the nature and status
        thereof has been reported to this Officer;

3.      To the best of this Officer's knowledge, nothing has arose to
        lead this Officer to believe that its Servicer has failed to
        perform any of its duties, responsibilities and obligations under
        its Servicing Agreement during the preceding calendar year;

4.      To the best of this Officer's knowledge, the Servicer is not in
        default of its obligations under the terms of its Servicing
        Agreement in any material respect, or, if there is a default in
        the fulfillment of its obligations, a description of each default
        or failure and the nature and status thereof has been reported to
        this Officer;

5.      The Master Servicer has received from its Servicer such Servicer's
        annual certificate of compliance and a copy of such Servicer's
        annual audit report, in each case to the extent required under
        the applicable Servicing Agreement, or, if any such certificate or
        report has not been received by the Master Servicer, the Master
        Servicer is using its best reasonable efforts to obtain such
        certificate or report.


Certified By:



/s/ R. Peter Karr
R. Peter Karr
Senior Vice President
Master Servicing Division
#### AQUELINA v. PROVIDENT REALTY CO. OF NEW YORK.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 18, 1903.)

1. Proposed Lease—Deposit—Recovery.

Where a sum is deposited by one as a pledge of good faith in the malting of a lease, he is entitled to recover it when, upon inspection, he refuses to execute the lease.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan.

Action by Nicola Aquelina against the Provident Realty Company of New York. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and BISCHOFF and BLANCHARD, JJ.

Townsend, Dyett & Levy, for appellant.

Ullo & Ruebsamen, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The evidence in the case fails to show a meeting of the minds of the contracting parties on the terms of the proposed lease. No lease was executed, and no rents became due by virtue of it. The $200 was left by plaintiff with defendant as a pledge of good faith, and good faith on the part of the defendant demanded its return when, upon inspection, the plaintiff refused to execute the lease.

The judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
### §724. Repealed. Aug. 2, 1954, ch. 649, title II, §205, 68 Stat. 622

Section, acts Apr. 23, 1949, ch. 89, §2(b), 63 Stat. 58; June 30, 1953, ch. 170, §25(b), 67 Stat. 128, related to purchase of insured mortgage loans by Federal National Mortgage Association, with respect to property in Hawaii.
### §10905. Offering abandoned rail properties for sale for public purposes

When the Board approves an application to abandon or discontinue under section 10903, the Board shall find whether the rail properties that are involved in the proposed abandonment or discontinuance are appropriate for use for public purposes, including highways, other forms of mass transportation, conservation, energy production or transmission, or recreation. If the Board finds that the rail properties proposed to be abandoned are appropriate for public purposes and not required for continued rail operations, the properties may be sold, leased, exchanged, or otherwise disposed of only under conditions provided in the order of the Board. The conditions may include a prohibition on any such disposal for a period of not more than 180 days after the effective date of the order, unless the properties have first been offered, on reasonable terms, for sale for public purposes.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §102(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 827.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 10906 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

A prior section 10905, Pub. L. 95–473, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1405; Pub. L. 96–448, title IV, §402(c), Oct. 14, 1980, 94 Stat. 1942; Pub. L. 103–272, §4(j)(26), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1369, related to offers of financial assistance to avoid abandonment and discontinuance, prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a). See section 10904 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
### SUBCHAPTER I—APPROVAL OF COVENANT AND SUPPLEMENTAL PROVISIONS
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Paul G. Anderson, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of FCStone Group, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):



a) all significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|    |  |                                                                       
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /S/    PAUL G.
ANDERSON                                               
|    |  | Paul G. Anderson Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)



Date: November 29, 2006
BERWYN INCOME FUND, INC. 
Amendment, Dated July 13, 1998, to the 
Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information, 
Dated April 30, 1998 
 
 
 
	The Transfer Agent charges a fee if a  
shareholder requests that the proceeds of a  
redemption from their account be wired.
OoT-<:?6r~ /^9-7-^$S 2 

Devany, Dennis (OST) 

h'\^'}\ 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Rich [rich@rawtreasures.com] 

Tuesday, August 10, 2010 1:46 PM 

Devany, Dennis (OST) 

EAS Service in Northern New York 

Dennis 

I just want to drop a note to support Gulfstream International EAS service for Massena, NY. The variety of 

flights available from a Boston destination provides much better alternatives than Albany. Today's paper had an 

article noting Cape Air was the preferred provider for Ogdensburg. Having relatively close air services choices 

of Albany and Boston would be great, but if only one company will be chosen for the regional air ports, I would 

ask that Gulfstream be chosen. 

Thank you for your time. 

Rich Williams
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Ruth Roth, Appellant, v. Model Pawnbrokers et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Testimony on behalf of the claimant in this death claim is that decedent, who was employed as a bookkeeper and cashier went through a period of unusual emotional stress in the work and that this precipitated a coronary thrombosis. The board, however, has found that the decedent “performed his normal work activities” and did not sustain any “ unusual stress or strain sufficient to constitute an accidental injury ”. The board then found unequivocally that he did not sustain an accidental injury and “there is no casual relation between the death and any alleged industrial accident Although there is proof the other way, the board’s finding is supported by substantial evidence. There is direct medical opinion sustaining the board’s view of causation. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
#### HADLOCK, Appellant, v. GIEBELER et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 3, 1905.)

Action by Albert E. Hadlock, as receiver, etc., of Eduard Giebeler, against Eduard Giebeler and others.

PER CURIAM.

Order appealed from modified on argument, so far as it wholly denies the plaintiff’s motion to vacate defendants’ order to show cause, and said motion granted, to the extent of modifying the extension of time contained in such order to show cause, so that the defendants shall be required to plead within 10 days from the entry of the order upon this appeal. No costs of this appeal to either party.
§ 886.311 Term of contract. The contract term for any unit shall not exceed 15 years, except that the term may be less than 15 years as provided under either paragraph (a) or (b) of this section. ( a ) The contract term may be less than 15 years if HUD finds that, based on the rental charges and financing for the multifamily housing project to which the contract relates, the financial viability of the project can be maintained under a contract having a term less than 15 years. Where a contract of less than 15 years is provided under this paragraph, the amount of rent payable by tenants of the project for units assisted under such a contract shall not exceed the amount payable for rent under section 3(a) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 for a period of at least 15 years.
( b ) The contract term may be less than 15 years if the assistance is provided under a contract authorized under section 6 of the HUD Demonstration Act of 1993, and pursuant to a disposition plan under this part for a project that is determined by the HUD to be otherwise in compliance with this part.
[60 FR 11859, Mar. 2, 1995]
----

----

|   | EXHIBIT      21.1 |
|--------|-------------------|

| NAME                                  |   | DOMESTIC JURISDICTION |
|---------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------|
|                                  |   |                       |
| Peninsula      Gaming Corp.           |   | Delaware                   |
|                                  |   |                       |
| Diamond      Jo, LLC                  |   | Delaware                   |
|                                  |   |                       |
| The      Old Evangeline Downs, L.L.C. |   | Louisiana                  |
|                                  |   |                       |
| Diamond      Jo Worth Holdings, LLC   |   | Delaware                   |
|                                  |   |                       |
| Diamond      Jo Worth, LLC            |   | Delaware                   |
|                                  |   |                       |
| Diamond      Jo Worth Corp.           |   | Delaware                   |

----
EXHIBIT 32.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)
  (a)
    
    the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31,
2008 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 By:
    
    /s/ EDWARD W. MARTIN, III

Edward W. Martin, IIIChief Financial Officer of
American Casino & Entertainment
Properties LLCDate:
    
    March 27, 2009
(February 10, 1978)

#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Gary Chamberlain, Petitioner, v Lady R. Rucinski, as Superintendent of Albany County Jail, et al., Respondents.

Application pursuant to CPLR 7002 (subd [b], par 2) for a writ of habeas corpus denied. Kane, J. P., Staley, Main, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 1206
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1206 (formerly part 206) appear at 67 FR 19111, Apr. 18, 2002.

§ 1206.350 What is the purpose of this subpart? ( a ) This subpart applies to all geothermal resources produced from Federal geothermal leases issued pursuant to the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 (GSA), as amended by the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct) (30 U.S.C. 1001 *et seq.*). The purpose of this subpart is to prescribe how to calculate royalties and direct use fees for geothermal production.
( b ) ONRR may audit and order you to adjust all royalty and fee payments. ONRR or an authorized State may require you to provide records for the audit by one or more of the methods specified in 30 CFR 1217.10.
( c ) In some cases, the regulations in this subpart may be inconsistent with a statute, settlement agreement, written agreement, or lease provision. If this happens, the statute, settlement agreement, written agreement, or lease provision will govern to the extent of the inconsistency. For purposes of this paragraph, the following definitions apply: ( 1 ) “Settlement agreement” means a settlement agreement between the United States and a lessee resulting from administrative or judicial litigation.
( 2 ) “Written agreement” means a written agreement between the lessee and the ONRR Director or Assistant Secretary, Policy, Management and Budget of the Department of the Interior that: ( i ) Establishes a method to determine the royalty from any lease that ONRR expects at least would approximate the value or royalty established under this subpart; and
( ii ) Includes a value or gross proceeds determination under § 1206.364 of this subpart.
[72 FR 24459, May 2, 2007, as amended at 88 FR 53792, Aug. 9, 2023]
### §1504. Conveyance of lands in Territories by aliens before escheat proceedings

Any alien who shall hold lands in any of the Territories of the United States in contravention of the provisions of this chapter may nevertheless convey his title thereto at any time before the institution of escheat proceedings as hereinafter provided. If any such conveyance shall be made by such alien, either to an alien or to a citizen of the United States, in trust and for the purpose and with the intention of evading the provisions of this chapter, such conveyance shall be null and void, and any such lands so conveyed shall be forfeited and escheat to the United States.

(Mar. 3, 1887, ch. 340, §4, 24 Stat. 477; Mar. 2, 1897, ch. 363, 29 Stat. 618.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 74 of Title 8, Aliens and Nationality.