alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §57502. Construction, reconditioning, and remodeling of vessels

(a) In General.—The Secretary of Transportation may have new vessels constructed, and have old vessels reconditioned or remodeled, as the Secretary determines necessary to carry out the objectives of this subtitle.

(b) Place of Work.—Construction, reconditioning, and remodeling of vessels under subsection (a) shall take place in shipyards in the continental United States (including Alaska and Hawaii). However, if satisfactory contracts cannot be obtained from private shipbuilders, the Secretary may have the work done in navy yards.

(c) Applicability of Construction-Differential Subsidy Provisions.—Contracts for the construction, reconstruction, or reconditioning of a vessel by a private shipbuilder under this chapter are subject to the provisions of title V of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, applicable to a contract with a private shipbuilder for the construction of a vessel under title V of that Act.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1664.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 57502(a), (b) | 46 App.:1192. | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title VII, §702, 49 Stat. 2008; Pub. L. 85–191, Aug. 28, 1957, 71 Stat. 471; Pub. L. 86–624, §35(c), July 12, 1960, 74 Stat. 421; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(104), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 162. |
| 57502(c) | 46 App.:1193(b). | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title VII, §703(b), 49 Stat. 2008. |

Section

In subsection (b), the words "for such new construction or reconstruction, in accordance with the provisions of this chapter" are omitted as unnecessary.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Merchant Marine Act, 1936, referred to in subsec. (c), is act June 29, 1936, ch. 858, 49 Stat. 1985. Title V of the Act enacted provisions set out as notes under section 53101 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1936 Amendment note set out under section 101 of this title and Tables.
### §1825. Effective date

This subchapter shall come into force upon its approval or at the time proclaimed by the President for the Constitution of the Northern Mariana Islands to become effective, whichever is the later date.

(Pub. L. 95–157, §5, Nov. 8, 1977, 91 Stat. 1267.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1694d of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Effective Date of Constitution

For provisions of proclamation of President relating to effective date for Constitution of Northern Mariana Islands, see Proc. No. 4534, Oct. 24, 1977, 42 F.R. 56593, set out as a note under section 1801 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3543 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3543

  To eliminate Medicare and Medicaid coverage of drugs when used for 
                   treatment of erectile dysfunction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 28, 2005

    Mr. Deal of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Gordon, and Mr. Gingrey) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To eliminate Medicare and Medicaid coverage of drugs when used for 
                   treatment of erectile dysfunction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF MEDICARE AND MEDICAID COVERAGE FOR DRUGS WHEN 
              USED FOR TREATMENT OF ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION.

    (a) In General.--Section 1927(d)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1396r-8(d)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(K) Agents when used for the treatment of 
                erectile dysfunction.''.
    (b) Elimination of Federal Payment Under Medicaid Program.--Section 
1903(i) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(i)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of paragraph (19);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (20) and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (20) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(21) with respect to amounts expended for covered 
        outpatient drugs described in section 1927(d)(2)(K) (relating 
        to drugs when used for treatment of erectile dysfunction).''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to drugs dispensed on or after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

Exhibit 31       Rule 13a-14(d) Certification



                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas G.  Lehmann,  a First Vice  President of  Washington  Mutual  Mortgage
Securities Corp., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of WaMu Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-AR10;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer under
the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon my knowledge and
the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as
disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that
agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided
by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated third parties acting as servicers
and sub-servicers:




None


Dated: March 29, 2005

                                     /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann
                                     ----------------------------------------
                                     Thomas G. Lehmann
                                     First Vice President
Order entered November 13, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00687-CR

CHRISTY ALLANE RODRIGUEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 397th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 064768

ORDER

On September 8, 2015, this Court struck the first Anders brief filed by counsel because it 

did not satisfy the requirements of Anders v. California and its progeny. Specifically, we noted 

the brief did not address the trial court’s rulings on appellant’s pretrial motions, voir dire, the 

trial court’s evidentiary rulings, the jury charges and any objections to them, the sentence 

imposed, or the sufficiency of trial counsel. We ordered counsel to file either an amended 

Anders brief that addressed the complete trail, including the identified deficiencies, or to file a 

brief raising issues on the merits. The Court also granted counsel a thirty-day extension of time 

to file the amended brief. On November 9, 2015, counsel filed a second Anders brief. Although 

the new brief addresses the pretrial motions and the effectiveness of trial counsel, the brief makes 

no mention of voir dire or the jury charges from both the guilt and punishment phases of trial. 
Therefore, we conclude the brief again does not satisfy the requirements of Anders v. California. 

Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, this is the order of the Court.

We STRIKE the Anders brief filed on November 9, 2015.

We GRANT the September 1, 2015 motion of Matthew Hamilton to withdraw as 

appellant’s counsel. We DIRECT the Clerk to remove Matthew Hamilton as appellant’s 

appointed attorney of record.

We ORDER the trial court to appoint new counsel to represent appellant on this appeal 

and to transmit to this Court the order appointing new counsel with TWENTY DAYS of the date 

of this order. 

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Brian Gary, 

Presiding Judge, 397th Judicial District Court; Matthew Hamilton; and the Grayson County 

District Attorney’s Office.

We ABATE the appeal to allow the trial court to comply with this order. We will 

reinstate the appeal twenty days from the date of this order or when the order appointing new 

counsel is received.

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
RCRA CLUSTERS XVI AND XVII REVISED AUTHORIZATIONAPPLICATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ADDENDUM TO PROGRAM DESCRIPTION (dated June 2008)
APPENDICES
I. REVISED ATTORNEY GENERAL'S STATEMENT (signed 6/23/08) II. RCRA CLUSTERS XIV AND XV ADDENDUM TO PROGRAM DESCRIPTION III. 2008 IDEQ ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE CHART IV. THE 2008 ANNUALRCRA GRANTWORKPLAN V. EXISTING RCRA MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (signed 8/2/01) VI. IDAHO HANDLER COUNTACTIVITY REPORT (dated 3113/08) VII. IDAHO PERMITTING SIX QUARTERPLAN (dated 3/14/08) VIII. HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENTIN IDAHO-2007 IX. RCRA CLUSTERS XVI AND XVII REGULATORY SUMMARIES X. IDAHO RULES AND STANDARDS FORHAZARDOUS WASTE (as of4/2/08) XI. IDAHO HAZARDOUS WASTEMANAGEMENTACT (wI2004Cumul.P.S. incl.nochg) XII. IDAHO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND HEALTH ACT (w/2007Cumul.P.S.) XIII. IDAHO PUBLIC RECORDS ACT (w/2007Cumul.P.S.)
**Exhibit 12.1**

**Certification by the Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

I, Jun Zhu, Chief Executive Officer of The9 Limited (the “Company”), certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of the Company; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and we have: 

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:June 30, 2006 

By:   /s/ JunZhu                    

Name: Jun Zhu 

Title: Chief Executive Officer
### §31327. Forfeiture of mortgagee interest

The interest of a mortgagee in a documented vessel or a vessel covered by a preferred mortgage under section 31322(d) of this title may be terminated by a forfeiture of the vessel for a violation of a law of the United States only if the mortgagee authorized, consented, or conspired to do the act, failure, or omission that is the basis of the violation.

(Pub. L. 100–710, title I, §102(c), Nov. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 4746.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 31327 | 46:961(b) |

Section 31327 provides for forfeiture of the mortgagee's interest if the mortgagee authorized, consented, or conspired to do the act, failure, or omission that is the basis of the violation that caused forfeiture of the vessel. This section makes no substantive change to law.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1989, with certain exceptions and qualifications, see section 107 of Pub. L. 100–710, set out as a note under section 31301 of this title.
Opinion issued July 24, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00568-CR

———————————

EX PARTE ROGER JOPLING

On Appeal from the 178th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1431568

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On July 11, 2014, appellant, Roger Jopling, filed a motion to dismiss this 

appeal. The motion to dismiss complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

42.2(a) and no prior decision has issued in this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss this appeal. 
2

We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Massengale.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-20942

EMMA J. HAYNES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS M.D. ANDERSON

 CANCER CENTER,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

(H-95-CV-2611)

May 20, 1997

Before KING, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Emma Haynes appeals from the district court’s grant of the

University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center’s motion for

summary judgment in her employment discrimination action under

Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Haynes alleges failure to

promote and wrongful termination in violation of Title VII. The
district court concluded, inter alia, that Haynes was unable to

raise a genuine issue of material fact regarding the articulated

non-discriminatory reasons proffered by the hospital to explain

both not promoting Haynes and subsequently firing her.

We have reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs and find

no reversible error. Therefore, we AFFIRM the grant of summary

judgment.
Attachment B

Receptors for Class I AreasFigure 1: Receptors for Arches National Park (ARCH)Figure 2: Receptors for Bandelier National Monument (BAND)Figure 3: Receptors for Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park (BLCA)Figure 4: Receptors for Canyonlands National Park (CANY)Figure 5: Receptors for Capitol Reef National Park (CARE)Figure 6: Receptors for Grand Canyon National Park (GRCA)Figure 7: Great Sand Dunes National Park (GRSA)Figure 8: Receptors for La Garita Wilderness (LAGA)Figure 9: Receptors for Maroon Bells-Snowmass Wilderness (MABE)Figure 10: Receptors for Mesa Verde National Park (MEVE)Figure 11: Receptors for Pecos Wilderness (PECO)Figure 12: Receptors for Petrified Forest National Park (PEFO)Figure 13: Receptors for San Pedro Parks Wilderness (SAPE)Figure 14: Receptors for West Elk Wilderness (WEEL)Figure 15: Receptors for Weminuche Wilderness (WEMI)Figure 16: Receptors for Wheeler Peak Wilderness (WHPE)
Back to 10Q


Exhibit 31.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








I, Bruce J. Wood, certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Schiff Nutrition International, Inc.;





2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;





4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; and





(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and





5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):





(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and





(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.








Date: January 9, 2009
By:
/s/ Bruce J. WoodBruce J. WoodChief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1620 Well-completion and well-workover requirements. ( a ) Lessees shall conduct well-completion and well-workover operations in sulphur wells, bleedwells, and brine wells in accordance with §§ 250.1620 through 250.1626 of this part and other provisions of this part as appropriate (see §§ 250.501 and 250.601 of this part for the definition of well-completion and well-workover operations).
( b ) Well-completion and well-workover operations shall be conducted in a manner to protect against harm or damage to life (including fish and other aquatic life), property, natural resources of the OCS including any mineral deposits (in areas leased and not leased), the National security or defense, or the marine, coastal, or human environment.
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2023 KW 0486

VERSUS

JEREMIAH GRISBY JULY 5, 2023

In Re: Jeremiah Grisby, applying for supervisory writs, 19th

Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, 

No. 11- 17- 0041. 

BEFORE: LANIER, HESTER, AND MILLER, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. Relator should seek enforcement from the

court that issued the order. 

WIL

CHH

CMM
### **CHAPTER 603—USER FEES**

Sec.
60301.
User fees.
60302.
User fees for underground natural gas storage facilities.
60303.
Fees for compliance reviews of liquefied natural gas facilities.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2020**—Pub. L. 116–260, div. R, title I, §103(b), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2215, added item 60303.

**2016**—Pub. L. 114–183, §12(d)(2), June 22, 2016, 130 Stat. 524, added item 60302.
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      William H. Joyce, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Nalco Finance
Holdings LLC ("Nalco") and Bradley J. Bell, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Nalco, in conjunction with the filing of Nalco's 10-K
financial report (the "Report") with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
covering the period ending December 31, 2005, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.
S. C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
as follows:

      a.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

      b.    The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material
            respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
            Nalco.

                               /s/ William H. Joyce
                               --------------------------------------------
                               William H. Joyce
                               Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                               Date: March 2, 2006

                               /s/ Bradley J. Bell
                               --------------------------------------------
                               Bradley J. Bell
                               Executive Vice President and Chief
                               Financial Officer
                               Date: March 2, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by SS.906 has been provided
to Nalco Holding Company and will be retained by Nalco Holding Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```