alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 964.16 HUD role in activities under this part. ( a ) *General.* Subject to the requirements of this part and other requirements imposed on HAs by the ACC, statute or regulation, the form and extent of resident participation including resident management are local decisions to be made jointly by resident councils/resident management corporations and their HAs. HUD will promote tenant participation and tenant opportunities programs, and will provide additional guidance, as necessary and appropriate. In addition, HUD will endeavor to provide technical assistance in connection with these initiatives.
( b ) *Monitoring.* HUD shall ensure that the requirements under this part are operating efficiently and effectively.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA Bitvectors Library for PVSThis paper describes a bitvectors library that has been developed for PVS. The library defines a bitvector as a function from a subrange of the integers into (0,1). The library provides functions that interpret a bitvector as a natural number, as a 2's complement number, as a vector of logical values and as a 2's complement fraction. The library provides a concatenation operator and an extractor. Shift, extend and rotate operations are also, defined. Fundamental properties of each of these operations have been proved in PVS.Document ID19970001377Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsButler, Ricky W.*(NASA Hampton, VA United States)*Miner, Paul S.*(NASA Hampton, VA United States)*Srivas, Mandayam K.*(SRI International Corp. Menlo Park, CA United States)*Greve, Dave A.*(Rockwell International Corp. Cedar Rapids, IA United States)*Miller, Steven P.*(Rockwell International Corp. Cedar Rapids, IA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1996Subject CategoryComputer SystemsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:110274NASA-TM-110274Accession Number97N11194Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-64-10-13Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970001377.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 990.175 Utilities expense level: Computation of the current consumption level.

The current consumption level shall be the actual amount of each utility consumed during the 12-month period ending June 30th that is 6 months prior to the first day of the applicable funding period.
#### Raymond Heller, appellee, v. Chicago Railways Company et al., appellants.

Gen. No. 28,502.

Judgment for personal injuries received in boarding defendant’s car. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Thomas G. Windes, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed October 2, 1923.

Thomas J. Symmes and Watson J. Ferry, for appellants; John R. Guilliams and Frank L. Kriete, of counsel. Anton Peeival and Charles C. Spencer, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.
Editorial Note on Part 985
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 985 appear at 64 FR 67983, Dec. 3, 1999.

§ 985.106 Required actions for SEMAP deficiencies. ( a ) When the PHA receives the HUD notification of its SEMAP rating, an PHA must correct any SEMAP deficiency (indicator rating of zero) within 45 calendar days from date of HUD notice.
( b ) The PHA must send a written report to HUD describing its correction of any identified SEMAP deficiency.
( c ) If an PHA fails to correct a SEMAP deficiency within 45 calendar days as required, HUD may then require the PHA to prepare and submit a corrective action plan for the deficiency within 30 calendar days from the date of HUD notice.
(Information collection requirements in this section have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2577-0215)
### §55119. Yukon River

Section 55102 of this title does not apply to the transportation of merchandise on the Yukon River until the Alaska Railroad is completed and the Secretary of Transportation finds that proper facilities will be available for transportation by citizens of the United States to properly handle the traffic.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1640.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 55119 | 46 App.:883 (4th proviso). | June 5, 1920, ch. 250, §27 (4th proviso), 41 Stat. 999; Exec. Order No. 6166, June 10, 1933, §12; July 2, 1935, ch. 355, 49 Stat. 442; June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title II, §204, title IX, §904, 49 Stat. 1987, 2016; Reorg. Plan No. 21 of 1950, eff. May 24, 1950, §204, 64 Stat. 1276; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(49), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 157. |

Section
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.890 Records. ( a ) You must maintain records that show the present status and history of each safety device. Your records must include dates and details of installation, removal, inspection, testing, repairing, adjustments, and reinstallation.
( b ) You must maintain these records for at least 2 years. You must maintain the records at your field office nearest the OCS facility and a secure onshore location. These records must be available for review by a representative of BSEE.
( c ) You must submit to the appropriate District Manager a contact list for all OCS facilities at least annually or when contact information is revised. The contact list must include: ( 1 ) Designated operator name;
( 2 ) Designated primary point of contact for the facility;
( 3 ) Facility phone number(s), if applicable;
( 4 ) Facility fax number, if applicable;
( 5 ) Facility radio frequency, if applicable;
( 6 ) Facility helideck rating and size, if applicable; and
( 7 ) Facility records location if not contained on the facility.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") of Pinnacle Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company"),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the
undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in
                  the Report.



/s/ Robert B. Nolen, Jr.
-----------------------------------------------------
Robert B. Nolen, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and
 Chief Financial Officer



August 14, 2003
-----------------------------------------------------
(Date)

         A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The
information furnished herein shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed
incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
### §§351, 352. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 351, act Mar. 3, 1889, ch. 424, §1, 30 Stat. 1098, which extended to Territory the system of public land surveys, was transferred to section 751a of Title 43, Public Lands.

Section 352, acts Mar. 2, 1907, ch. 2537, §4, 34 Stat. 1232; Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 462, 43 Stat. 1144; Oct. 9, 1942, ch. 584, §2, 56 Stat. 779, which provided for making of land surveys in Nome and Fairbanks districts, was transferred to section 751b of Title 43.
(Republished)

#### Corhill Corporation, Respondent, v. S. D. Plants, Inc., Appellant.

Appeal from order, entered March 30, 1960, insofar as it denies motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously dismissed as moot. Order, entered June 3, 1960, insofar as it denies the motion to dismiss the amended complaint under subdivision 6 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant, and the motion granted, with $10 costs, and judgment directed in favor of defendant dismissing the amended complaint, with costs. The contract provided that the making and acceptance of final payment should constitute *“*a waiver * * * of all claims by the Subcontractor, except those previously made and still unsettled.” It is undisputed that on or about January 15, 1958, plaintiff sent defendant two invoices, one marked “ Final Payment ”, and that on or about January 28, 1958, payment was made and accepted in the aggregate amount of the invoices. No facts are stated in the opposing affidavits on either motion which tend to show that at the time of final payment unsettled claims existed which had been made by plaintiff prior thereto. Nor are there any evidentiary averments relating any prior negotiations to the legal claims expressed in the amended complaint. The letter dated December 13, 1957, is a plea for relief from the contract, not an assertion of claims under the contract. Accordingly, there is no factual issue requiring a trial. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and Eager, JJ. [23 Misc 2d 349.]
Editorial Note on Part 985
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 985 appear at 64 FR 67983, Dec. 3, 1999.

§ 985.207 Frequency of assessments. ( a ) *Frequency of small rural PHA assessments* — ( 1 ) *Initial assessment.* The initial small rural PHA assessment will be effective when the PHA's next SEMAP assessment would have been applied. For PHAs that qualify for SEMAP biennial review as a small PHA (less than 250 assisted units), the transition to the small rural PHA assessment will occur when the PHA's next biennial SEMAP assessment is required.
( 2 ) *Triennial assessments.* HUD shall assess small rural PHAs no more than once every three years, except that a troubled small rural PHA shall be subject to an annual assessment in accordance with § 985.209.
( b ) [Reserved]
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

B. V. J.,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-30047

D.C. No. 4:09-cr-00113-SEH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 19, 2010** 

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Appellant, a juvenile, appeals from the sentence imposed following his trueplea to an act of juvenile delinquency, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 5031, that

constituted aiding and abetting burglary, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2(a); 18 U.S.C.

§ 1153(a), (b). Appellant was sentenced to official detention for 14 months and to

FILED

OCT 28 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-30047

supervision following his release from official detention until his eighteenth

birthday. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The record reflects that the district court conducted the requisite “assessment

of the totality of the unique circumstances and rehabilitative needs” of appellant. 

United States v. Juvenile, 347 F.3d 778, 787 (9th Cir. 2003). Appellant has not

shown that the district court abused its discretion by failing to impose the “least

restrictive means to accomplish [appellant’s] rehabilitation.” Id. 

AFFIRMED.
STEPS BALLASTS

Release Analysis 4/27/99

Comments due on

Web materials

5/18/99

Workshop 6/1/99

Comments Due on

Workshop

6/15/99

NOPR drafting,

review and

approval

6/17/99 - 10/15/99

NOPR Published 10/15/99

Final Rule 1 7/3/2000

EE-RM-97-500 COMMENT 68CC

STEPS BALLASTS 

Release Analysis 4127/99 

Comments due on 5/18/99 

Web materials 

Workshop 6/1/99 

Comments Due on 6/15/99 

Workshop 

NOPR drafting, 6/17/99 - 10/15/99 

review and 

approval 

NOPR Published 10/15/99 

Final Rule 7/3/2000
#### § 1243.2 What leases are subject to this part?

This part applies to all Federal mineral leases onshore and on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS), and to all federally-administered mineral leases on Indian tribal and individual Indian mineral owners' lands.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ernest Page, Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person, will be treated as a motion to dispense with printing. Motion granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers (including the typed minutes) and on a typewritten brief. The appellant is directed to file five copies of his brief and to serve one copy. The appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to the January 1961 Term, for which term the appeal is ordered to be placed on the calendar. Motion for assignment of counsel granted. Donald H. McCann, Esq., 32 Montgomery Street, Newburgh, New York, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
### §915. Bonds as public debt

Such bonds shall not be a debt of Puerto Rico or any municipality, and shall not constitute a public indebtedness within the meaning of section 3 of the Act of Congress approved March 2, 1917, entitled "An Act to provide a civil government for Porto Rico, and for other purposes", as amended.

(June 25, 1938, ch. 703, §5, 52 Stat. 1203.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 3 of the Act of Congress approved March 2, 1917, referred to in text, is section 3 of act Mar. 2, 1917, ch. 145, 39 Stat. 953. The provisions of section 3 of the Act limiting the public indebtedness of Puerto Rico and of certain municipalities thereof were contained in section 745 of this title, prior to the amendment made to that section by Pub. L. 87–121, §1, Aug. 3, 1961, 75 Stat. 245, which struck out those provisions. See 1961 Amendment note under section 745 of this title.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Puerto Rican Federal Relations Act which comprises this chapter.
§ 908.112 Extension of time. The HUD Field Office may grant an HA an extension of time, of a reasonable period, for implementation of the requirements of § 908.104, if it determines that such electronic submission is infeasible because of one of the following: ( a ) Lack of staff resources;
( b ) Insufficient financial resources to purchase the required hardware, software or contractual services; or
( c ) Lack of adequate infrastructure, including, but not limited to, the inability to obtain telephone service to transmit the required data.
§ 1218.202 Late payment or underpayment charges. ( a ) The failure to make timely or proper payment of any monies due pursuant to leases and contracts subject to these rules will result in the collection by ONRR of the full amount past due plus a late payment charge. Exceptions to this late payment charge may be granted when estimated payments on minerals production have already been made timely and otherwise in accordance with instructions provided by ONRR to the operator/lessee. However, late payment charges assessed with respect to any Indian lease, permit, or contract shall be collected and paid to the Indian or tribe to which the amount overdue is owed.
( b ) Late payment charges will be assessed on any late payment or underpayment from the date that the payment was due until the date that the payment was received at the ONRR addresses specified in § 1218.51. Payments received at the specified ONRR addresses after 4 p.m. mountain time are considered received the following business day.
( c ) Late payment charges are calculated on the basis of a percentage assessment rate. In the absence of a specific lease, permit, license or contract provision prescribing a different rate, this percentage assessment rate is prescribed by the Department of the Treasury as the “Treasury Current Value of Funds Rate.”
( d ) This rate is available in the Treasury Fiscal Requirements Manual Bulletins that are published prior to the first day of each calendar quarter for application to overdue payments or underpayments in the new calendar quarter. The rate is also published in the Notices section of the Federal Register and indexed under “Fiscal Service/Notices/Funds Rate; Treasury Current Value.”
( e ) Late payment charges apply to all underpayments and payments received after the date due. These charges include production, minimum, or advance royalties; assessments for liquidated damages; or any other payments, fees, or assessments that an operator/lessee is required to pay by a specified date. The failure to pay past due payments, including late payment charges, will result in the initiation of other enforcement proceedings.
( f ) An overpayment on a lease or leases may be offset against an underpayment on a different lease or leases to determine a net underpayment on which interest is due pursuant to conditions specified in § 1218.42.
[47 FR 33195, July 30, 1982; 47 FR 53366, Nov. 26, 1982. Redesignated at 48 FR 35641, Aug. 5, 1983, and further redesignated at 52 FR 23815, June 25, 1987, as amended at 57 FR 41868, Sept. 14, 1992; 57 FR 62207, Dec. 30, 1992; 59 FR 14559, Mar. 29, 1994; 65 FR 55189, Sept. 13, 2000; 67 FR 19112, Apr. 18, 2002]
Exhibit 31.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Mark S. Hiltwein, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Rand Logistics, Inc.; and





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





Date: July 31, 2017





/s/ Mark S. HiltweinMark S. HiltweinChief Financial Officer
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 07, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, May 07, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18I0166. DAVID SEGOVIA-ESPINOZA v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

17B00139
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 28, 2009 

d0921 

Order 

 

September 28, 2009 

138452 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138452 

 COA: 288344 

Wayne CC: 91-010567-FC 

MICHAEL E. VAUGHN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 4, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion 

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7043

MICHAEL A. BOYD, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. COMM. OF HAMPTON CIR.; GENE JOHNSON, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00055-RBS-TEM)

Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 23, 2009

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael A. Boyd, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael A. Boyd seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable.

Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v.

McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Boyd has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Filed 7/17/02 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2002 ND 123

In the Interest of N.S.

Madeline Free, M.D., Petitioner and Appellee

v.

N.S., Respondent and Appellant

No. 20020145

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Robert O. Wefald, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Wayne D. Goter, P.O. Box 1552, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-1552, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.

Julie A. Lawyer, Assistant State’s Attorney, 514 E. Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501-4413, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.

In the Interest of N.S.

No. 20020145

Per Curiam.

[¶1]N.S. appeals from a district court order continuing treatment for a period not to exceed ninety days.  N.S. argues there was insufficient evidence presented to establish she was chemically dependent and alternative forms of treatment were not available.  We affirm under N.D.R.App.P.35.1(a)(2).

[¶2]William A. Neumann, acting C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Dale V. Sandstrom

Michael O. McGuire, D.J.

[¶3]The Honorable Michael O. McGuire, D.J., sitting in place of VandeWalle, C.J., disqualified.