**SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST** ( In accordance with 40 CFR Part 51

- App. V)

SI P Submitted by : Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VADEQ) Date Submitted: March 9, 2012 Subject: 2008 L ead National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) I nfrastructure state implementation plan (SI P)

Completeness Review Completed by : Melissa L inden Date Completed: August 10 , 2012

**Administrative Materials ACCEPTABLE** 

**EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL**  **(X)**

1. A for mal letter of submittal from the Governor or his designee, requesting EPA approval of the plan or revision thereof. 1. Yes, the March 9, 2012 letter was signed by David Pay lor the Director of VADEQ as the approved designee for SI P submittals. X

2. Evid ence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code or body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, or consent agreement in final form. That evidence shall include the date of adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of the pla n, if different from the adoption/issuance date. Check to see if the regulation, permit, order or consent decree has a sunset or expiration date. I f so it is not acceptable as a SI P submission. 2. Yes, applicable sections of 110(a)(2) are adopted into the Virginia Air Pollution Control L aw and/or Virginia’s SI P in 40CFR Part 52.2420 X

3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority under State law to adopt and implement the plan. 3. Yes, Virginia has the authority under Section 10.1

- 1185 of the Air pollution control law. X

4. A copy of actual regulation, or document submitted for approval and incorporation by reference into the plan, including indication of the changes made to the existing approved plan, 4. All state regulations have been previously adopted and are just being certified as applicable in the March 9, 2012 submittal. X**EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL**  **(X)**

where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the official State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State. The effective date of the regulation/document shall, whenever possible, be indicated i n the document itself.
5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural requirements of the State's laws and constitution in conducting and completing the adoption/issuance of the plan. 5. Yes, the submittal certifying that Virginia meets all the applicable requirements of 110(a)(2) for the pollutant lead was signed and submitted following the procedural requiremen ts of the Commonwealth. X

6. Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed change consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including the date of publication of such notice. 6. Yes, the notice of public comment period was published in the Virg inia Register of Regulations on January 30, 2012. The notice announced that the comment period was from January

30, 2012 through February 29, 2012. X

7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance with the information provided in the pub lic notice and the State's laws and constitution, if applicable. 7. In the notice of public comment the option was given for a hearing to be held, but no request was received. X

8. Compilation of public comments and the State's response thereto. 8. Vi rginia did submit a public participation record where they state no comments were received on this revision. X

**Technical Materials**

1. I dentification of all regulat ed pollutants affected by the plan. 1. Yes, 2008 L ead NAAQS X

2. I dentification of the locations of affected sources including the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation of the locations and the status of the attainment plan for the affected area(s). 2. The SI P revision applies to the entire Commonwealth of Virginia. X

3. Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions from the affected sources; estimates of changes in current actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate
, quantification of changes in actual emissions from affected sources through calculations of the differences between certain baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result of the revision. 3. No changes in the emissions of affected sources will occur from the certification of the current regulations approved in Virginia’s SI P as a result of this revision. X**EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL**  **(X)**

4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air quality standards, prevention of significant deterioration increments, re asonable further progress demonstration, and visibility , as applicable, are protected if the plan is approved and implemented. 4. The SI P revision addresses the required section 110(a)(2) SI P elements, which relate to the general information and authorities that constitute the “infrastructure” of the lead air quality management program. X

5. Modeling information required to support the proposed revision, including input data, output data, models used, ambient monitoring data used, meteorolog ical data used, justification for use of offsite data (where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the determination of adequacy of the modeling analy sis. 5. The authority to do modeling is certified in this revision, bu t specific modeling is not required for this revision. X

6. Evidence, where necessary , that emission limitations are based on continuous emission reduction technology

. 6. Contained in the control regulations for lead in the current Virginia SI P. X

7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, where necessary , to ensure emission levels. 7. Contained in the control regulations for lead in the current Virginia SI P. X

8. Complian ce/enforcement strategies, including how compliance will be determined in practice. 8. Contained in the control regulations for lead in the current Virginia SI P. X

9. Special economic and technological justifications required by
any applicable EPA policie s. (I f a policy is not appropriate, explain why .) 9. N/A

10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a maintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant NAAQS for at least 10 y ears after redesignation. 10. N/A