alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the report) for the purpose of complying with
Rule 13a14(b) or Rule 15d14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Ray C. Dillon, the Chief Executive Officer, and Kenneth D. Mann, the Chief Financial Officer, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

condition and results of operations of Deltic Timber Corporation.



/s/ Ray C. DillonRay C. DillonChief Executive OfficerNovember 6, 2008/s/ Kenneth D. MannKenneth D. MannChief Financial OfficerNovember 6, 2008
Anthony Brodzki, Plaintiff,
v. United States ofAmerica, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

# FILED JUN- 52012 Clerk, U.S. District &Bankruptcy Courts for the District of Columbia ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil ActionNo. 

# 12 0898

MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on its initial review ofplaintiffs complaint against the United States and his application toproceedinformapauperis. The application will be granted and the case will be dismissed for lack ofsubject matterjurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) (requiring dismissal ofan action "at any time" the Court determines that it lacks subject matterjurisdiction). Plaintiff, a resident ofNorth Richland Hills, Texas, sues the United States for $50 million in damages alleging that the Justice Departmentwas complicit in his beingraped and tortured from 1968 to 1970. Plaintiffalso seeks a temporary restraining order "to stop thejustice department for privacy and torture and electronic torture occurring as retaliation." Compl. at 2 (page number supplied). He has provided no factual basis for granting such extraordinary relief. A claim for monetary damages against the United States is cognizable under the Federal Tort Claims Act ("FTCA"), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671 et seq. Such a claim is maintainable, however, only after the plaintiffhas exhausted administrative remedies by "first present[ing] the claim to the appropriate Federal agency...." 28 U.S.C. § 2675. This exhaustion requirement is 

# 3

### jurisdictional. See GAFCorp. v. UnitedStates, 

### 818 F.2d 901, 917-20 (D.C. Cir. 1987); Jackson
v. UnitedStates, 

### 730 F.2d 808, 809 (D.C. Cir. 1984); Stokes v. U.S. Postal Service, 

### 937 F. Supp. 11, 14 (D.D.C. 1996). Plaintiffhas not indicated that he exhausted his administrative remedies under the FTCA. Therefore, this case will be dismissed. 1 SeeAbdurrahman v. Engstrom, 

### 168 Fed.Appx. 445, 445 (D.C. Cir. 2005) (per curiam) ("[T]he district court properly dismissed case [based on unexhausted FTCA claim] for lack ofsubject matterjurisdiction."); Brodzki v. United States of America, 

### Civ. Action No. 12-0164 (D.D.C. Jan. 31, 2012) (finding same). A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

Date: May

# _1:!_, 2012

### Unit~d States District Judge

1 

### Plaintiffstates that he is also "suingthejustice department for not disclosing the names ofthe rapist
....," Compl. at 2, but he has not alleged that he requested records from the Department ofJustice under the Freedom ofInformation Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. § 552, and was denied. A properly submitted FOIA request and the exhaustion of administrative remedies are prerequisites to obtainingjudicial review ofan agency's denial ofrecords. See Hidalgo v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, 

### 344 F.3d 1256, 1258-60 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Oglesby v. Dep 't of theArmy, 

### 920 F.2d 57, 61 (D.C. Cir. 1990). 2
".•::ARTMENT O 

# RENEWABLE S IBERDROL

A ^:MWmo k •Gi l '^EP- I A S:2 5 Jul y 27 , 201 1 Aloh aLe y U S Dept
. of Transportatio n 40 0 7 * Stree t

S W Roo m640 1 Washington
. D

C 2059 0 Subject : Small Communit y Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Grant Applicatio n Docket DOT-OST-2011-011 9 Klamat h Falls , O R Dea r Ms
. Ley : Iberdrol aRenewable s i s please dt o submi t thi s lette r

o f suppor t fo r th e Klamat

h Fall s Airport gran t applicatio n t o th e U.S
. Departmen t o f Transportatio n Small Communit y Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Grant Program
. W

e believ e tha t

ther e i s hig h deman dfo

r asecon droun dtri p fligh t betwee n Portlan dan dKlamat h Fall s an dtha t

i t wil l contribut e greatl y t o th e economi c vitality o f ou r area . W e recogniz e th e importanc e o f quality commercial ai r

servic e t o th e economy throug h improve dacces s fo r visitors , an dmos t

importantly , t o suppor t

are a businesses , organization s an dinstitutions
. Iberdrol aRenewable s i s pledgin g $1,500.0 0 i n cas h toward s th e advertisin g an dpromotio n o f thi s secon droundtri p fligh t t o Portland
. Th e contemplate dimprovement s wil l brin g th e materia l benefit s of schedule dai r transportatio n t o abroadsectio n o f th e travelin g public , includin g businesses , educationa l institutions , an dothe r

enterprise s whos e acces s t o th e nationa l ai r transportatio n syste mi s limited
. Again , Iberdrol aRenewable s strongl y support s thi s gran t applicatio n an dw e hop e tha t yo u wil l giv e i t

favorabl e consideration
. Sincerely , Raymon dMarten s Plan t Managing Directo r

- Klamat h Cogeneratio n Projec t cc : Charle s Massi e - Klamat h Count y Chamber

o f Commerc e Mik e Robert s IBERDROL

A RENEWABLES
. Inc
. Klamal h Energy , LL C 494 0 Hw y 9 7 S Klamat h Falls , O R 9760 3 Telephon e (541)883-311 8
**EXHIBIT      32**

**Certificate      Of Chief Executive Officer And Acting Chief Financial      Officer**

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.      1350)**

|   | 1. | The                    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                    or 15(d) of                    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                    and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                    respects, the financial results of operations of the                    Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                             |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Michael                      A. Grollman                                                                                                                |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                  |   |   |        |
| Michael                        A. GrollmanChairman,                          Chief Executive Officer,and                          Acting Chief Financial Officer |   |   |   |
---

---

Exhibit 10.0

Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-133523 and 333-140906)
pertaining to the 1997 Share Option Plan, 2001 Share Option Plan and 2003 Share Option
Plan of Saifun Semiconductors Ltd. of our report dated March 28, 2007, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Saifun Semiconductors Ltd. and its subsidiaries
included in its Annual Report (Form 20-F, File No. 000-51581) for the year ended December
31, 2006, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

| | By:  /s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
A Member of Ernst & Young Global
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tel-Aviv, Israel 
March 30,
2007



---

---
#### In re MILLS. In the matter of George E. Mills, an attorney.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 6, 1903.)

No opinion. Motion granted.-
§ 1212.200 Maintenance of and access to records. ( a ) All records pertaining to Federal and Indian solid minerals leases shall be maintained by a lessee, operator, revenue payor, or other person for 6 years after the records are generated unless the record holder is notified, in writing, that records must be maintained for a longer period. When an audit or investigation is underway, records shall be maintained until the record holder is released by written notice of the obligation to maintain records.
( b ) The ONRR shall have access to all records of the operator/lessee pertaining to compliance to Federal royalties, including, but not limited to: ( 1 ) Qualities and quantities of all products mined, processed, sold, delivered, or used by the operator/lessee.
( 2 ) Prices received for mined or processed products, prices paid for like or similar products, and internal transfer prices.
( 3 ) Costs of mining, processing, handling, and transportation.
[47 FR 33193, July 30, 1982. Redesignated at 48 FR 35641, Aug. 5, 1983, and amended at 51 FR 15767, Apr. 28, 1986; 54 FR 1532, Jan. 13, 1989]
K-1

APPENDIX K 

PREPARERS OF THE PLAN 

An interdisciplinary team of BLM specialists from the BLM Albuquerque District, Rio Puerco Field Office has 

prepared this plan. The following table lists the names and qualifications of the team members. 

Name Assignment Education Related Experience a

John Bristol Team Lead; 

Visual Resources, Wild & 

Scenic Rivers, Wilderness 

BS—Landscape Architecture BLM/USFS—35 years 

Roger Cumpian Vegetation BS—Animal Science 

& Range 

BLM—28 years 

John Gilmore Geology, Minerals, 

Paleontology 

BS—Geology BLM/Industry—27 years 

Kent Hamilton Planning, NEPA 

Coordination, Social & 

Economic Conditions 

BS—Agricultural Economics BLM/BIA—45 years 

Pamela Herrera-Olivas Riparian Resources BS—Biology, 

MS—Environmental Science 

BLM—9 years 

Andy Iskra Wildlife; Threatened, 

Endangered & SpecialStatus Species; Riparian 

Resources 

BS—Wildlife Biology BLM/USFS/NMFS—20 years 

Debby Lucero Lands & Realty, 

Access & Transportation 

BS—Environmental Science BLM/USFS/NPS—20 years 

Connie Maestas Lands & Realty, 

Access & Transportation 

Associate of Applied 

Science—Paralegal Studies 

BLM—25 years 

David Mattern Soil, Water, Air BS—Forest Management, 

MS—Watershed Hydrology 

BLM/USFS—20 years 

Brett O’Haver Vegetation, 

Rangeland Management 

BS—Wildlife Biology BLM/NRCS—26 years 

Danny Randall Recreation, Photography Natural Resource Experience BLM—26 years 

Todd Richards Woodlands; 

Fire Management 

BS—Education BLM/USFS—13 years 

John Roney Cultural Resources BA—Sociology/ 

Anthropology, 

MA—Anthropology 

BLM—30 years 

Kathy Walter National Landscape 

Conservation System 

Manager; Recreation 

BUS—Anthropology, 

MA—Recreation 

BLM/DOD/NPS/HCRS—30 

years 

M’Lee Beazley Design, Desktop Publishing, 

Printing, Photography 

Certification—Graphic 

Design 

BLM—21 years 

Dawn Chavez GIS Mapping & Analysis BA—Geography BLM—3 years 

Greg Homan GIS Mapping & Analysis BA—Geography BLM/Other—19 years 

Gretchen Obenauf Writer/Editor—Final StandAlone Plan BA, MA—Archeology BLM/BIA/NPS—31 years 

Sarah W. Spurrier Writer/Editor—Draft & 

Proposed Plan 

BA—Psychology, MBA BLM/Industry—27 years 

Note: aBIA—Bureau of Indian Affairs, BLM—Bureau of Land Management, DOD—Department of Defense, 

HRCS—Heritage Conservation & Recreation Service, NMFS—New Mexico Forestry Service, NPS—National Park 

Service, NRCS—Natural Resources Conservation Service, USFS—U.S. Forest Service
Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting
      Firm





The
      Board
      of Directors


James
      River Coal Company:




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
      333-129970) on Form S-3 and (No. 333-126860) on Form S-8 of James
      River Coal Company of our reports dated March 15, 2007, with respect to the
      consolidated balance sheets of James River Coal Company and subsidiaries as
      of
      December 31, 2006 and 2005 (Successor Company), and the related
      consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity (deficit)
      and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the years then ended
      (Successor Company), the eight months ended December 31, 2004 (Successor
      Company), and the four months ended April 30, 2004 (Predecessor Company),
      and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
      financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of
      internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
      2006,  which
      reports appears in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of
      James River Coal Company. Our report on the consolidated financial statements
      included explanatory paragraphs that state that (1) in connection with the
      Company’s emergence from Chapter 11, all assets and liabilities were
      restated to their respective fair values as of May 6, 2004 in order to
      reflect the effects of fresh start accounting and, as a result, the consolidated
      financial statements of the Successor Company are presented on a different
      basis
      than those of the Predecessor Company and, therefore, are not comparable and
      (2)
      the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
      Standards No. 123(R), *Share-Based
      Payment* ,
      and
      Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, *Employers’
      Accounting for Defined Pension and Other Postretirement Plans* during
      2006 *.*











Richmond,
      Virginia


March
      15,
      2007
### §864. Appeals, certiorari, removal of causes, etc.; use of English language

The laws of the United States relating to appeals, certiorari, removal of causes, and other matters or proceedings as between the courts of the United States and the courts of the several States shall govern in such matters and proceedings as between the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico and the courts of Puerto Rico.

All pleadings and proceedings in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico shall be conducted in the English language.

(Apr. 12, 1900, ch. 191, §35, 31 Stat. 85; Mar. 2, 1917, ch. 145, §42, 39 Stat. 966; Feb. 13, 1925, ch. 229, §13, 43 Stat. 942; Jan. 31, 1928, ch. 14, §1, 45 Stat. 54; May 17, 1932, ch. 190, 47 Stat. 158; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §21, 62 Stat. 990.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The laws of the United States relating to appeals, certiorari, removal of causes, and other matters or proceedings, referred to in text, are classified to Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### Codification

"United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico" substituted in text for "District Court of the United States for Puerto Rico" in view of section 132(a) of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, which states that "There shall be in each judicial district a district court which shall be a court of record known as the United States District Court for the district" and section 119 of Title 28, which states that "Puerto Rico constitutes one judicial district."

#### Prior Provisions

Act Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §244, 36 Stat. 1157, related to direct appeals from The Supreme Court and the United District Court for Puerto Rico to the United States Supreme Court, prior to repeal by act Jan. 28, 1915, ch. 22, §3, 38 Stat. 804.

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in act Apr. 12, 1900, ch. 191, §34, 31 Stat. 84.

#### Amendments

1948—Act June 25, 1948, amended section generally, and struck out provisions relating to the term of district court and appeals to the circuit court.

1928—Act Jan. 31, 1928, abolished writ of error in civil and criminal cases and made all relief formerly obtained by writ of error obtainable by appeal.

1925—Act Feb. 13, 1925, ch. 229, §13, repealed provisions of this section permitting a direct review by the Supreme Court of cases in the courts in Puerto Rico.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Puerto Rico" substituted in text for "Porto Rico" pursuant to act May 17, 1932, which is classified to section 731a of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1948 Amendment

Amendment by act June 25, 1948, effective Sept. 1, 1948, see section 38 of that act, set out as an Effective Date note preceding section 1 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### Repeals

Section 39 of act June 25, 1948, repealed section 1 of act Feb. 13, 1925, ch. 229, 43 Stat. 936, formerly cited as a credit to this section, which authorized review in the Circuit Court of Appeals in the First Circuit.
### §217. Agents' acts and omissions; liability of carrier

In construing and enforcing the provisions of this chapter, the act, omission, or failure of any officer, agent, or other person acting for or employed by any common carrier or user, acting within the scope of his employment, shall in every case be also deemed to be the act, omission, or failure of such carrier or user as well as that of the person.

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title II, §217, 48 Stat. 1077.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, 48 Stat. 1064, known as the Communications Act of 1934, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 609 of this title and Tables.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 21, 2016

a0914 

# Order

Clerk September 21, 2016

151849

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 151849

COA: 326365

Roscommon CC: 14

- 007145

- FC

DAVID SUTTON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 8, 2015 order of

the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursu ant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting

leave to appeal, we VACATE the sentence of the Roscommon Circuit Court, and we

REMAND this case to the trial court for resentencing. The trial court erred by ass ign ing

50 points under Offense V ariable 11, MCL 77 7.41, for penetrations that did not arise out

of the particular sentencing offense. People v Johnson , 474 Mich 96 (2006). Because

correcting the OV score would change the applicable guidelines range, resentencing is

required. People v Kimble , 470 Mich 3 05 (2004).

We do not retain jurisdiction.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3490 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3490

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain rubber or plastic footwear.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2005

Mr. Ryun of Kansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain rubber or plastic footwear.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN RUBBER OR PLASTIC FOOTWEAR.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.64.07      Footwear for men    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         or women, with                                                     31/2009
                         outer soles of
                         leather or
                         composition
                         leather and with
                         uppers of textile
                         materials
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         6404.20.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 15, 2011 

t0712 

Order 

 

July 15, 2011 

142821 

CHRISTOPHER TUCKER, by his Guardian, 

PAMELA WATSON, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142821 

 COA: 294754 

Oakland CC: 2008-095097-NO 

VINCENT PIPITONE and VINCENT PIPITONE, 

JR., d/b/a PRO BUILT CONSTRUCTION, PRO 

BUILT CUSTOM BUILDING CORPORATION, 

PRO BUILT CUSTOM BUILDING, INC., 

VINCE PRO BUILT, and IMPROVEMENTS 

UNLIMITED, INC., 

Defendants, 

and 

RICHARD CARSON, d/b/a CARSON HOME 

MAINTENANCE, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 15, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED. The Court of 

Appeals did not err in affirming the Oakland Circuit Court’s denial of the motion to 

dismiss the plaintiff’s negligence claim against defendant Richard Carson on the 

defendant’s stated basis that the plaintiff had failed to identify a legal duty that was 

separate and distinct from the defendant’s contractual duties pursuant to Fultz v UnionCommerce Assoc, 470 Mich 460, 467 (2004). The Court of Appeals correctly held that 

the plaintiff had alleged a separate and distinct common law duty on the part of the 

defendant to use ordinary care in order to avoid physical harm to foreseeable persons in 

the execution of his undertakings. Loweke v Ann Arbor Ceiling & Partition Co, LLC, 

489 Mich 157 (2011). 

 HATHAWAY, J., would deny leave to appeal without the further statements found 

in the majority’s order.