alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1






The following certifications are being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in
accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238. These certifications shall not be
deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, nor shall they be incorporated by reference in any filing of
the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
 
 
 Certification
of Chief Executive Officer
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created
by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Schiff Nutrition International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),
hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:
 
 (i)  the accompanying Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedAugust 31, 2008(the “Report”) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (ii)  the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:October 8,
    2008
              By:
              /s/
      Bruce J. WoodBruce J.
    WoodChief Executive
      Officer
 
 A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Schiff Nutrition
International, Inc. and will be retained by Schiff Nutrition International, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.




Certification
of Chief Financial Officer
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created
by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Schiff Nutrition International, Inc. a Delaware, corporation (the “Company”),
hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:
 
 (iii)  the accompanying Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedAugust 31, 2008(the “Report”) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (iv)  the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:October 8,
    2008
              By:
              /s/
      Joseph W. BatyJoseph W.
    BatyChief Financial
      Officer
 
 A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Schiff Nutrition
International, Inc. and will be retained by Schiff Nutrition International, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
§ 256.73 Effect of suspensions on lease term. ( a ) A suspension may extend the term of a lease (see 30 CFR 250.171) with the extension being the length of time the suspension is in effect except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) A Directed Suspension does not extend the lease term when the Regional Supervisor directs a suspension because of: ( 1 ) Gross negligence; or
( 2 ) A willful violation of a provision of the lease or governing regulations.
( c ) BSEE may issue suspensions for a period of up to 5 years per suspension. The Regional Supervisor will set the length of the suspension based on the conditions of the individual case involved. BSEE may grant consecutive suspensions. For more information on suspension of operations or production refer to the section under the heading “Suspensions” in 30 CFR part 250, subpart A.
#### § 906.29 Below-Market sales and financing.

A homeownership plan may provide for below-market purchase prices or below-market financing to enable below-market purchases, or a combination of the two. Discounted purchase prices may be determined on a unit-by-unit basis, based on the particular purchaser's ability to pay, or may be determined by any other fair and reasonable method (*e.g.,* uniform prices for a group of comparable dwellings, within a range of affordability by potential purchases). Below-market financing may include any lawful type of public or private financing, including but not limited to purchase-money mortgages, non-cash second mortgages, promissory notes, guarantees of mortgage loans from other lenders, shared equity, or lease-purchase arrangements.
U.S. Department of Justice

Recommended 

AMBER Alert Criteria 

1. Law enforcement officials have a reasonable belief that an abduction has occurred. 

2. Law enforcement officials believe that the 

child is in imminent danger of serious 

bodily injury or death. 

3. Enough descriptive information exists 

about the victim and the abductor for law 

enforcement to issue an AMBER Alert. 

4. The victim of the abduction is a child age 

17 years or younger. 

5. The child’s name and other critical data 

elements—including the child abduction 

(CA) and AMBER Alert (AA) flags—have 

been entered into the National Crime 

Information Center (NCIC) system. 

LT000498 4/05 
National Crime Information Center (NCIC

Entry Process and Criteria 

Enter the information immediately—with NO 

delay. This includes information about the victim 

and/or perpetrator, vehicle used in the abduction, 

and other information that would help law enforce

ment apprehend the perpetrator and safely recover 

the child. 

Use the proper NCIC category. Child abduction 

cases should be entered into the Missing Persons 

File in either the endangered or involuntary category, and the child abduction (CA) flag should be 

entered. 

When an AMBER Alert (AA) is issued, the AA 

flag should be entered in the record. If the law enforcement agency or Criminal Justice Information 

Services (CJIS) Systems Agency cannot set the flag, 

notify the National Center for Missing & Exploited 

Children (NCMEC) immediately at 800–843–5678 

or reporting agency ORI VA007019W or <mailto: 

amberalerts@ncmec.org>. NCMEC will contact the 

appropriate state AMBER Alert coordinator to approve updating the NCIC record with an AA flag. 

Add the image of the child to the record when 

available. Also attach photos of vehicles, suspects, 

tattoos, and other potential identifiers. Care should 

be taken to ensure that the miscellaneous (MIS) 

field clearly states if the photo is of the perpetrator. 

Regularly update information about the victim 

and suspect. Link records if suspect or vehicle information is entered into NCIC.
### §20114. Judicial procedures

(a) Criminal Contempt.—In a trial for criminal contempt for violating an injunction or restraining order issued under this chapter, the violation of which is also a violation of this chapter, the defendant may demand a jury trial. The defendant shall be tried as provided in rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (18 App. U.S.C.).

(b) Subpenas For Witnesses.—A subpena for a witness required to attend a district court of the United States in an action brought under this chapter may be served in any judicial district.

(c) Review of Agency Action.—Except as provided in section 20104(c) of this title, a proceeding to review a final action of the Secretary of Transportation under this part or, as applicable to railroad safety, chapter 51 or 57 of this title shall be brought in the appropriate court of appeals as provided in chapter 158 of title 28.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 870.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20114(a) | 45:439(b). | Oct. 16, 1970, Pub. L. 91–458, §§209(d), 210(b), 84 Stat. 975, 976. |
| 20114(b) | 45:438(d). | |
| 20114(c) | 45:431(f). | Oct. 16, 1970, Pub. L. 91–458, §202(f), 84 Stat. 972; restated Sept. 3, 1992, Pub. L. 102–365, §5(a)(1), 106 Stat. 975. |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "the defendant may demand a jury trial" are substituted for "trial shall be by the court, or, upon demand of the accused, by a jury" to eliminate unnecessary words and for consistency in the revised title.

In subsection (b), the words "may be served in any judicial district" are substituted for "may run into any other district" for clarity.

In subsection (c), the words "a final action of the Secretary" are substituted for "Any final agency action taken by the Secretary" to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "this part or, as applicable to railroad safety, chapter 51 or 57 of this title" are substituted for "this subchapter or under any of the other Federal railroad safety laws, as defined in section 441(e) of this title" because of the restatement. The words "is subject to judicial review as provided in chapter 7 of title 5" are omitted as unnecessary because 5:ch. 7 applies unless otherwise stated. The words "by and in the manner prescribed" are omitted as surplus.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 14

- 00552

- CV

Cesar VELEZ

, Appellant

v.

UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI

, Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 11974

Honorable Solomon Casseb III, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 25, 2015

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.1(a)(1). We order all costs assessed against appellant. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(d) (absent

agreement of parties, costs are taxed against appellant).

PER CURIAM
### §53516. Termination of agreement after change in regulations

If, after an agreement has been made under this chapter, a change is made either in the joint regulations or in the regulations prescribed by the Secretary under this chapter that could have a substantial effect on the rights or duties of a person maintaining a fund under this chapter, that person may terminate the agreement.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1600.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 53516 | 46 App.:1177(l) (last sentence). | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title VI, §607(l) (last sentence), 49 Stat. 2005; June 23, 1938, ch. 600, §§23–28, 52 Stat. 960; Aug. 4, 1939, ch. 417, §10, 53 Stat. 1185; July 17, 1952, ch. 939, §§17–19, 66 Stat. 764; Pub. L. 85–637, Aug. 14, 1958, 72 Stat. 216; Pub. L. 86–518, §1, June 12, 1960, 74 Stat. 216; Pub. L. 87–45, §6, May 27, 1961, 75 Stat. 91; Pub. L. 87–271, Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat. 570; restated Pub. L. 91–469, §21(a), Oct. 21, 1970, 84 Stat. 1032; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(97)(A), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 162. |

Section
Exhibit 4.45
    
 
 
   1.
    
    The Borrowers desire to establish Shenzhen Shangtong Software Co., Ltd.(the
Company) whose registered capital will be RMB1,000,000, and Borrower A and Borrower B
will respectively hold 55% and 45% of the equity interest in the Company.
 2.
    
    The Borrowers desire to borrow a loan (the Loan) from the Lender to invest in the
Company.
 3.
    
    The Lender agrees to provide the Loan to Borrowers.




---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



#####
#### Pauline R. Goldfein et al. v. Harry Goldberg, Doing Business as Chatham Button Co.

Application denied, with $10 costs. The stay contained in the order to show cause, dated July 5, 1960, is vacated. Concur'— Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.
#### PEOPLE, Respondent, v. McCULLOUGH, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 1, 1905.)

Proceedings by the people of the state of New York •against Thomas McCullough. No opinion. Judgment of conviction and orders affirmed.
#### Frances Martone *v.*Frank M. Martone

The plaintiff’s cross petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 28 Conn. App. 208 (AC 10420), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Having determined that a portion of the lump sum alimony award must be set aside, did the Appellate *910Court properly remand for a modified judgment rather than for a new hearing, or for a trial on all of the financial issues?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14628.

*Steven D. Ecker,*in support of the petition.

*Max F. Brunswick,*in opposition.

Decided October 30, 1992
California Environmental Protection Agency AIR RESOURCES BOARD

Executive Order S-14-013 WHEREAS, the rules identified in Enclosure A have been adopted or amended by the following air pollution control and air quality management districts (districts):

Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District Butte County Air Quality Management District Feather River Air Quality Management District Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District South Coast Air Quality Management District WHEREAS, the districts are authorized by California Health and Safety Code (H&SC) section 40001 to adopt and enforce the rules identified in Enclosure A; WHEREAS, the rules have been submitted to the Air Resources Board (ARB) for inclusion in the California State Implementation Plan (SIP) as a reasonably available control measures for limiting emissions of air pollutants within the districts; WHEREAS, ARB has determined that these rules are necessary to meet requirements of the federal Clean Air Act; and WHEREAS, ARB is authorized by H&SC sections 39601, 39602, and 41650 through 41652 to adopt district rules as revisions to the SIP. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that ARB hereby adopts the districts' rules identified in Enclosure A as revisions to the SIP. I certify, pursuant to 40 CFR 51.102(f), that the rules identified in Enclosure A were adopted or amended after notice and public hearings as required by 40 CFR 51.102(a) and 51.102(d). Executed in Sacramento, California, this iP~ day of %(lY;1t m1yc; , 2014.

Richard Corey Executive Officer
### §50306. Requiring testimony and records in investigations

(a) In General.—In conducting an investigation that the Secretary of Transportation considers necessary and proper to carry out this subtitle, the Secretary may administer oaths, take evidence, and subpoena persons to testify and produce documents relevant to the matter under investigation. Persons may be required to attend or produce documents from any place in the United States at any designated place of hearing.

(b) Fees and Mileage.—Persons subpoenaed by the Secretary under subsection (a) shall be paid the same fees and mileage paid to witnesses in the courts of the United States.

(c) Enforcement of Subpoenas.—If a person disobeys a subpoena issued under subsection (a), the Secretary may seek an order enforcing the subpoena from the district court of the United States for the district in which the person resides or does business. Process may be served in the judicial district in which the person resides or is found. The court may issue an order to obey the subpoena and punish a refusal to obey as a contempt of court.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(b), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1566.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 50306 | 46 App.:1124. | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title II, §214, 49 Stat. 1991; June 23, 1938, ch. 600, §3, 52 Stat. 954; Pub. L. 91–452, title II, §241, Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 930; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(72), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 159; Pub. L. 98–237, §20(a), Mar. 20, 1984, 98 Stat. 89; Pub. L. 98–595, §2, Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 3132. |

Section

In subsection (a), the word "affirmations" is omitted as unnecessary because of the definition of "oath" in 1 U.S.C. 1. The words "or any territory, district, or possession thereof" are omitted as unnecessary because of the definition of "United States" in chapter 1 of the revised title.

Subsection (c) is substituted for the source provision to eliminate unnecessary words.
Back to 10Q
 
 Exhibit 10.2






AMENDMENT NO. 3
 TO THE
 SCHIFF NUTRITION INTERNATIONAL, INC.
 2004 INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN
  This Amendment No. 3 (Amendment) to the Schiff Nutrition International, Inc. 2004 Incentive Award Plan (the Plan), is adopted by Schiff Nutrition International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company),
on December 8, 2008 (the Effective Date).  Capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined shall have the same meanings assigned to them in the Plan.
  RECITALS
  A.  Section 14.1 of the Plan provides that the Administrator (as defined in the Plan) may, with the approval of the Board of Directors of the Company (the Board), amend the Plan, subject to certain limitations.  Section 12.1 of the Plan authorizes
the Board, in its absolute discretion, to exercise any and all rights and duties of the Administrator under the Plan, subject to certain limitations.
  B.  The Board deems it to be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to amend the Plan.
  AMENDMENT
  1.
Section 11.1(a) of the Plan shall be amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:
  (a)  In the event of any stock dividend, stock split, combination or exchange of shares, merger, consolidation, spin-off, recapitalization, distribution of Company assets to stockholders (other than normal cash dividends), or any other corporate event affecting the Stock or the share price of the Stock, the Administrator shall make
such proportionate adjustments, if any, to reflect such changes with respect to (i) the aggregate number and type of shares that may be issued under the Plan (including, but not limited to, adjustments of the limitations in Sections 3.1 and 3.3); (ii) the terms and conditions of any outstanding Awards (including, without limitation, any applicable performance targets or criteria with respect thereto); and (iii) the grant or exercise price per share for any outstanding Awards under the Plan.  Any adjustment
affecting an Award intended as Qualified Performance-Based Compensation shall be made consistent with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code.
  2.
Each and every award agreement evidencing an outstanding award under the Plan is hereby deemed amended consistent with this Amendment.
  3.
Except as otherwise expressly set forth in this Amendment, the Plan and each award agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.
  4.
This Amendment shall be governed by, interpreted under, and construed and enforced in accordance with the internal laws, and not the laws relating to conflicts or choice of laws, of the State of Delaware applicable to agreements made and to be performed wholly within the State of Delaware.
  
 (Signature Page Follows)
 
 Back to top 
  I hereby certify that this Amendment was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of Schiff Nutrition International, Inc. on December 8, 2008.

Executed this 8th day of December, 2008.



SCHIFF NUTRITION INTERNATIONAL, INC.Bruce J. WoodPresident and Chief Executive Officer 
 2
  Back to top
Exhibit 21.1
 Outdoor Channel Holdings, Inc.
  State ofIncorporation/Name
    
    Organization
    
    Percent Held43455 BPD, LLC
    
    California
    
    100%OC Corporation
    
    California
    
    100%Winnercomm, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    100%The Outdoor Channel, Inc.
    
    Nevada
    
    100% (held by OC Corporation)SkyCam, Inc.(1)
    
    Delaware
    
    100% (held by Winnercomm, Inc.)CableCam, Inc.(1)
    
    Delaware
    
    100% (held by Winnercomm, Inc.)
 
 (1)
    
    Reorganized into limited liability companies effective January 1, 2011.
Document

Exhibit 10.1
November 7, 2022
Jeff Jacobson
At the Address on file with the Company




Dear Jeff,
This letter agreement (this “Letter Agreement”), effective as of November 7, 2022 (the “Effective Date”), sets forth the terms and conditions of our agreement regarding your new position as Chief Growth Officer. Capitalized terms used in this Letter Agreement that are not defined herein have the meanings set forth in your employment agreement with Hortican Inc., a corporation organized under the federal laws of Canada (the “Company”), dated as of June 21, 2019 (the “Employment Agreement”).
1.Position and Reporting Relationship.
As of the Effective Date, your employment with the Company will continue in the position of Chief Growth Officer of Cronos Group Inc. (“Cronos Group”). You will continue to be instructed by report to the Chief Executive Officer of Cronos Group.
2.Compensation.
As of the Effective Date: (a) the Base Salary will increase to CAD $420,000, less applicable deductions and withholdings; (b) your annual target bonus opportunity will increase to 115% of Base Salary; and (c) your target annual long-term incentive opportunity over shares of Cronos Group will increase to 115% of Base Salary.
3.General.
Except as expressly modified by this Letter Agreement, all terms and conditions of your employment, as set out in the Employment Agreement, including, without limitation, Section 6 (“Termination of Employment”) and Section 7 (“Restrictive Covenants”), remain unchanged and continue in full force and effect.
4.Independent Legal Advice.
You acknowledge that you have been encouraged to obtain independent legal advice regarding the execution of this Letter Agreement, and that you have either obtained such advice or voluntarily chosen not to do so, and hereby waive any objections or claims you may make resulting from any failure on your part to obtain such advice.
5.Counterparts.
This Letter Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which when executed shall be deemed to be an original but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement.  Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page to this Letter Agreement by electronic transmission, including in portable document format (.pdf), shall be deemed as effective as delivery of an original executed counterpart of this Letter Agreement.
If you agree that this Letter Agreement correctly memorializes our understandings, please sign and return this Agreement, which shall become a binding agreement as the Effective Date.








Sincerely,
HORTICAN INC.
By:    /s/ Michael Gorenstein    
Name:    Michael Gorenstein
Title:    President and Chief Executive        Officer
CRONOS GROUP INC.
By:    /s/ Michael Gorenstein    
Name:    Michael Gorenstein
Title:    President and Chief Executive        Officer


Accepted and Agreed:
/s/ Jeff Jacobson    
Jeff Jacobson
Date: November 7, 2022
TS-H201PP Attachment3

Page 1/1

Chemical structure diagram

CBI
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.854 Floating production units equipped with turrets and turret-mounted systems. ( a ) For floating production units equipped with an auto slew system, you must integrate the auto slew control system with your process safety system allowing for automatic shut-in of the production process, including the sources (subsea wells, subsea pumps, *etc.*) and releasing of the buoy. Your safety system must immediately initiate a process system shut-in according to §§ 250.838 and 250.839 and release the buoy to prevent hydrocarbon discharge and damage to the subsea infrastructure when the following are encountered: ( 1 ) Your buoy is clamped,
( 2 ) Your auto slew mode is activated, and
( 3 ) You encounter a ship heading/position failure or an exceedance of the rotational tolerances of the clamped buoy.
( b ) For floating production units equipped with swivel stack arrangements, you must equip the portion of the swivel stack containing hydrocarbons with a leak detection system. Your leak detection system must be tied into your production process surface safety system allowing for automatic shut-in of the system. Upon seal system failure and detection of a hydrocarbon leak, your surface safety system must immediately initiate a process system shut-in according to §§ 250.838 and 250.839.