alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,911,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (248,800)
<INVENTORY>                                  7,991,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,624,700
<PP&E>                                       1,569,400
<DEPRECIATION>                               (327,500)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,800,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,401,100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,700
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,226,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,800,300
<SALES>                                     12,932,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,932,200
<CGS>                                        9,266,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,907,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               117,200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             234,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                818,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                   346,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            472,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   472,600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TCI
SATELLITE ENTERTAINMENT INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,982
<SECURITIES>                                    79,249
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  85,450
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        67,882
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,462
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    85,450
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,511
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 74,932
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             74,932
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    74,932
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.11


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Wise Metals Group LLC (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, David DAddario, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 17, 2007



By:

/s/ David DAddarioDavid DAddarioChairman and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsHelicopter Acoustic Flight Test with Altitude Variation and ManeuversA cooperative flight test campaign between NASA and the U.S. Army was performed from September 2014 to February 2015. The purposes of the testing were to: investigate the effects of altitude variation on noise generation, investigate the effects of gross weight variation on noise generation, establish the statistical variability in acoustic flight testing of helicopters, and characterize the effects of transient maneuvers on radiated noise for a medium-lift utility helicopter. This test was performed at three test sites (0, 4000, and 7000 feet above mean sea level) with two aircraft (AS350 SD1 and EH-60L) tested at each site. This report provides an overview of the test, documents the data acquired and describes the formats of the stored data.Document ID20170000728Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsWatts, Michael E.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Greenwood, Eric*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Sim, Ben*(Army Aviation and Missile Research Development Engineering Center (AMRDEC) Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Stephenson, James*(Army Aviation and Missile Research Development Engineering Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Smith, Charles D.*(Analytical Mechanics Associates, Inc. Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredJanuary 24, 2017Publication DateDecember 1, 2016Subject CategoryAcousticsReport/Patent NumberL-20729NASA/TM-2016-219354NF1676L-24899Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 664817.02.07.03.01.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20170000728.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 886.315 Security and utility deposits. ( a ) *Amount of deposits.* If at the time of the initial execution of the Lease the Owner wishes to collect a security deposit, the maximum amount shall be the greater of one month's Gross Family Contribution or $50. However, this amount shall not exceed the maximum amount allowable under State or local law. For units leased in place, security deposits collected prior to the execution of a Contract which are in excess of this maximum amount do not have to be refunded until the Family is expected to pay security deposits and utility deposits from its resources and/or other public or private sources.
( b ) *When a Family vacates.* If a Family vacates the unit, the Owner, subject to State and local law, may use the security deposit as reimbursement for any unpaid Family Contribution or other amount which the Family owes under the Lease. If a Family vacates the unit owing no rent or other amount under the Lease consistent with State or local law or if such amount is less than the amount of the security deposit, the Owner shall refund the full amount or the unused balance to the Family.
( c ) *Interest payable on deposits.* In those jurisdictions where interest is payable by the Owner on security deposits, the refunded amount shall include the amount of interest payable. The Owner shall comply with all State and local laws regarding interest payments on security deposits.
( d ) *Insufficient deposits.* If the security deposit is insufficient to reimburse the Owner for the unpaid Family Contribution or other amounts which the Family owes under the Lease, or if the Owner did not collect a security deposit, the Owner may claim reimbursement from HUD for an amount not to exceed the lesser of: ( 1 ) The amount owed the Owner,
( 2 ) two months' Contract Rent, minus, in either case, the greater of the security deposit actually collected or the amount of security deposit the owner could have collected under the program (pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section). Any reimbursement under this section must be applied first toward any unpaid Family Contribution due under the Lease and then to any other amounts owed. No reimbursement shall be claimed for unpaid rent for the period after the family vacates.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Airbee Wireless, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for
the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I Richard P. Sommerfeld, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)
    
    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of the operations of the Company.  
 /s/ Richard P. Sommerfeld, Jr.Richard P. Sommerfeld, Jr.Chief Financial OfficerJune 15, 2005
### §910b. Ratification of prior acts

All legislation heretofore enacted by the Legislature of the Territory of Puerto Rico dealing with the subject matter of this Act and not inconsistent herewith is ratified and confirmed.

(July 18, 1950, ch. 466, title I, §103, 64 Stat. 345.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, means act July 18, 1950, ch. 466, 64 Stat. 344, known as the Territorial Enabling Act of 1950, which enacted sections 480 to 480b, 483a, 483b, 721 to 721b, 910 to 910b, 1408 to 1408e of this title, amended sections 481 to 483 and 722 of this title, and enacted provisions set out as notes under sections 480, 481, and 722 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Puerto Rican Federal Relations Act which comprises this chapter.

Section 103 of act July 18, 1950, cited as a credit to this section, as applicable to Alaska and Hawaii, was classified to sections 480b and 721b of this title.
### SUBCHAPTER I—MOTOR CARRIER TRANSPORTATION
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of                the                Company. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                *E.                Eugene Sharer* |
|------------------------------------------------------|
| E.                Eugene Sharer.                     |
| Interim                Chief Financial Officer       |
| April                7, 2008                         |

----
Back to 10Q


Exhibit 31.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








I, Joseph W. Baty, certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Schiff Nutrition International, Inc.;





2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;





4.  The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and





(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and





5.  The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and





(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.








Date: January 9, 2009
By:
/s/ Joseph W. BatyJoseph W. BatyChief Financial Officer
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3238 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on isoxaben. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 12, 2005 

Mr. BUYER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on isoxaben. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ISOXABEN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.96 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 N-[3-(1-ethyl-1-methylpropyl)-5-isoxazolyl]-2,6- 

7 dimethoxybenzamide (isoxaben)) is amended by striking 

8 ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 3238 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
### **CHAPTER 67—MULTIMODAL INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENTS**

Sec.
6701.
National infrastructure project assistance.
6702.
Local and regional project assistance.
6703.
National culvert removal, replacement, and restoration grant program.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2021**—Pub. L. 117–58, div. B, title I, §21203(b), Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 677, added item 6703.
#### The People of the State of New York v. William Waterson, Alias E. William Janda.

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mime*1010ographed appellant’s points upon the District Attorney of New York County, and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of appellant’s points, together with the original record, with this court and on the further condition that the appeal be perfected and noticed for argument for a term on or before the March 1961 Term of this court. James F. Dwyer, Esq., of 460 Park Avenue, New York, New York, is assigned as counsel for the appellant for the purposes of the appeal. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
§ 1229.103 Duration of delegations; termination of delegations. ( a ) Delegations of authority shall be valid for a period of 3 years and may be renewable for an additional consecutive 3-year period upon request of the State and after the appropriate factfinding required in § 1229.101. Delegations are subject to annual funding and the availability of appropriations specifically designated for the purpose of this part.
( b ) A delegation of authority may be terminated at any time and upon any terms and conditions as mutually agreed upon by the parties.
( c ) A State may terminate a delegation of authority by giving a 120-day written notice of intent to terminate.
( d ) The Department may terminate a delegation of authority when it is determined, after opportunity for a hearing, that the State has failed to substantially comply with the provisions of the delegation of authority.
( e ) No action to initiate formal hearing proceedings for termination shall be taken until the Department has notified the State in writing of alleged deficiencies and allowed the State 120 days to correct the deficiencies.
( f ) Termination of a delegation shall not bar a subsequent request by a State to regain a delegation of authority.
[49 FR 37351, Sept. 21, 1984, as amended at 49 FR 40025, Oct. 12, 1984]
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.1013 Grounds for forfeiture of pipeline right-of-way grants.

Failure to comply with the Act, regulations, or any conditions of the right-of-way grant prescribed by the Regional Supervisor shall be grounds for forfeiture of the grant in an appropriate judicial proceeding instituted by the United States in any U.S. District Court having jurisdiction in accordance with the provisions of 43 U.S.C. 1349.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tumbleweed Communications Corp. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Craig
D. Brennan, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 2, 2005



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/S/ CRAIG D. BRENNAN                
|Craig D. Brennan                    
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.422 When may I resume drilling after cementing? ( a ) After cementing surface, intermediate, or production casing (or liners), you may resume drilling after the cement has been held under pressure for 12 hours. For conductor casing, you may resume drilling after the cement has been held under pressure for 8 hours. One acceptable method of holding cement under pressure is to use float valves to hold the cement in place.
( b ) If you plan to nipple down your diverter or BOP stack during the 8- or 12-hour waiting time, you must determine, before nippling down, when it will be safe to do so. You must base your determination on a knowledge of formation conditions, cement composition, effects of nippling down, presence of potential drilling hazards, well conditions during drilling, cementing, and post cementing, as well as past experience.