alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13A-14**

**PROMULGATED UNDER**

**SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003**

I, Laurie Romanak, Chief Financial Officer of CB Richard Ellis Realty Trust, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CB Richard Ellis Realty Trust; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this annual report is being prepared; and 

(b) [Omitted in reliance on SEC Release No. 33-8238;34-47986, Section III E.] 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: April 2, 2007
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Paul G. Anderson, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of FCStone Group, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|    |  |                                                                       
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /S/    PAUL G.
ANDERSON                                               
|    |  | Paul G. Anderson Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)



Date: November 29, 2007
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER****Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     I, Richard P. Brown, President and Chief Executive Officer of American Casino EntertainmentProperties LLC, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Casino & EntertainmentProperties LLC (the Registrant) for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the Report);     2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this Report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;     4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is beingprepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on suchevaluation; and  c) disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     By: /s/ Richard P. Brown         Richard P. Brown    President and Chief Executive Officer of    American Casino & Entertainment Properties LLC  Date:March 26, 2008
§ 983.259 Security deposit: Amounts owed by tenant. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 38334 , May 7, 2024.
( a ) *Security deposit permitted.* The owner may collect a security deposit from the tenant.
( b ) *Amount of security deposit.* The PHA must prohibit the owner from charging assisted tenants security deposits in excess of private market practice, or in excess of amounts charged by the owner to unassisted tenants.
( c ) *Use of security deposit.* When the tenant moves out of the contract unit, the owner, subject to state and local law, may use the security deposit, including any interest on the deposit, in accordance with the lease, as reimbursement for any unpaid tenant rent, damages to the unit, or other amounts which the tenant owes under the lease.
( d ) *Security deposit reimbursement to owner.* The owner must give the tenant a written list of all items charged against the security deposit and the amount of each item. After deducting the amount used to reimburse the owner, the owner must promptly refund the full amount of the balance to the tenant.
( e ) *Insufficiency of security deposit.* If the security deposit is not sufficient to cover amounts the tenant owes under the lease, the owner may seek to collect the balance from the tenant. However, the PHA has no liability or responsibility for payment of any amount owed by the family to the owner.
[70 FR 59913, Oct. 13, 2005. Redesignated at 79 FR 36169, June 25, 2014; 89 FR 38334, May 7, 2024]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                           MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER
                               CREDIT CORPORATION

                              Michael J. Gillespie
                               Accounting Director

                              Officer's Certificate

Pursuant to the Servicing Agreement between Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Credit
Corporation, formerly known as NOVUS Financial Corporation, as seller and
servicer (referred to herein in such capacity as the "Servicer"), and Sequoia
Mortgage Trust 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12; 2003-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8; 2004-1, 2, 3, 4,
5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, the undersigned, hereby states that:

      (1) A review of the activities of the Servicer and of its performance
under the Servicing Agreement during the calendar year ended December 31, 2004
has been made under my supervision; and

      (2) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period.

                                                MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER
                                                CREDIT CORPORATION

                                                By /s/ Douglas J. Bush
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                         Douglas J. Bush

                                                Title Director

                                                Dated as of December 31, 2004

                                                By /s/ David Bianucci
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                         David Bianucci
                                                Title Vice President

                                                Dated as of December 31, 2004

   2500 Lake Cook Road. I East, Riverwoods, Illinois 60015 Tel (224) 405-1903

[ILLEGIBLE]
#### § 964.24 HUD policy on FIC Program.

HUD promotes Family Investment Centers which provide better access to educational and employment opportunities for residents living in public housing. HUD encourages resident involvement in the FIC Program and promotes resident-HA partnerships to achieve mutual goals.
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### §§ 250.143-250.144 [Reserved]
Exhibit 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We have issued our report dated June 26, 2018, with respect to the financial statements and supplemental information included in the Annual Report of Navistar, Inc. 401(k) Plan for Represented Employees on Form 11-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. We consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of Navistar International Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 333-162266).


/s/ Grant Thornton LLP


Chicago, Illinois


June 26, 2018
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3494 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3494

               For the relief of Veronica Mitina Haskins.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2005

  Mr. Frank of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               For the relief of Veronica Mitina Haskins.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR VERONICA MITINA HASKINS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Veronica Mitina Haskins 
shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment 
of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Veronica Mitina Haskins enters the 
United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 
she shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status 
under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Veronica Mitina Haskins, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Veronica 
Mitina Haskins shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded 
any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
Case 3:09-cv-02593-MMC Document 58 Filed 02/12/10 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:09-cv-02593-MMC Document 58 Filed 02/12/10 Page 2 of 5
Case 3:09-cv-02593-MMC Document 58 Filed 02/12/10 Page 3 of 5
Case 3:09-cv-02593-MMC Document 58 Filed 02/12/10 Page 4 of 5
Case 3:09-cv-02593-MMC Document 58 Filed 02/12/10 Page 5 of 5
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**396 KA 15-01572**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

JAMIE ALTMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JAMIE ALTMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT PRO SE.
SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (SCOTT MYLES OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Monroe County Court (Douglas A. Randall, J.), entered March 2, 2015. The order, insofar as appealed from, issued superceding orders of protection.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed ( see CPL 450.10; People v Whalen , 49 AD3d 916, lv denied 10 NY3d 940).

Entered: April 29, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
### The Hovey Group of northeastern Maine

By: Louis Pavlides

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1194B

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (458 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6815

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

STEVEN NADROSKI,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, 

District Judge. (4:06-cr-00027-RAJ-JEB-2)

Submitted: October 14, 2010 Decided: October 21, 2010

Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Nadroski, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Ronald Gill, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Steven Nadroski seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for 

reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) motion. The order is 

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006); 

Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Nadroski has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 
3

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
### §2149. Termination of Oversight Board

An Oversight Board shall terminate upon certification by the Oversight Board that—

(1) the applicable territorial government has adequate access to short-term and long-term credit markets at reasonable interest rates to meet the borrowing needs of the territorial government; and

(2) for at least 4 consecutive fiscal years—

(A) the territorial government has developed its Budgets in accordance with modified accrual accounting standards; and

(B) the expenditures made by the territorial government during each fiscal year did not exceed the revenues of the territorial government during that year, as determined in accordance with modified accrual accounting standards.

(Pub. L. 114–187, title II, §209, June 30, 2016, 130 Stat. 576.)
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3368 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2005 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 6483 Lincoln Street in Gagetown, Michigan, 

as the ‘‘Gagetown Veterans Memorial Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

HR 3368 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 6483 Lincoln Street in Gagetown, Michigan, shall 

4 be known and designated as the ‘‘Gagetown Veterans Me5 morial Post Office’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Gagetown Veterans Memorial Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 25, 

2005. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.