alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §732. Repealed. July 3, 1950, ch. 446, §5(2), 64 Stat. 320

Section, acts Mar. 2, 1917, ch. 145, §4, 39 Stat. 953; May 17, 1932, ch. 190, 47 Stat. 158, designated San Juan as the capital of Puerto Rico. Section 6 of act Apr. 12, 1900, ch. 191, 31 Stat. 79, formerly cited as a credit to this section, was not repealed by act July 3, 1950.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Act July 3, 1950, ch. 446, §5, 64 Stat. 320, provided that the repeal of this section and sections 735, 750, 753, 754, 771–793, 793b, 796–799, 811–820, 822, 823, 824–844, 861, and 873 of this title and the amendment of sections 737 and 752 of this title were to be effective at such time as the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico became effective. Under section 731d of this title, that Constitution, upon approval by the Congress of the United States, "shall become effective in accordance with its terms". Congress, by act July 3, 1952, ch. 567, 66 Stat. 327, approved, with certain conditions, that Constitution; the approving act further provided that the Constitution, as so approved, "shall become effective when the Constitutional Convention of Puerto Rico shall have declared in a formal resolution its acceptance in the name of Puerto Rico of the conditions of approval herein contained, and when the Governor of Puerto Rico, being duly notified by the proper officials of the Constitutional Convention of Puerto Rico that such resolution of acceptance has been formally adopted, shall issue a proclamation to that effect". The Constitution was proclaimed by the Governor of Puerto Rico on July 25, 1952, and became effective on that date.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3535 

To amend the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 to require country of 

origin labeling for macadamia nuts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2005 

Mr. CASE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 to require 

country of origin labeling for macadamia nuts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELING REQUIRED 

4 FOR MACADAMIA NUTS. 

5 (a) GENERAL REQUIREMENT.—Section 

6 281(2)(A)(vi) of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 

7 (7 U.S.C. 1638(2)(A)(vi)) is amended by striking ‘‘pea8 nuts’’ and inserting ‘‘peanuts and macadamia nuts’’. 

9 (b) REQUIREMENTS FOR UNITED STATES COUNTRY

10 OF ORIGIN.—Section 282(a)(2)(E) of such Act (7 U.S.C. 
2 

•HR 3535 IH 

1 1638a(a)(2)(E)) is amended by striking ‘‘commodity or 

2 peanuts’’ and inserting ‘‘commodity, peanuts, or maca3 damia nuts’’. 

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Gastrointestinal Small Business applications.                    

*Date:*                         December 10, 2020.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Santanu Banerjee, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institute of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 2106, Bethesda, MD 20892 (301) 435-5947,                         *banerjees5@mail.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 24, 2020. 

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2020-26425 Filed 11-30-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.811 Specifications for SSSVs—dry trees.

All surface-controlled and subsurface-controlled SSSVs, safety valve locks, and landing nipples installed in the OCS must conform to the requirements specified in §§ 250.801 through 250.803.
Summary	of	Interagency	Working	Comments	on	Draft	Language	under	EO	

12866	and	EO	13563	Interagency	Review.		Subject	to	Further	Policy	Review.

Interagency	Comments	on	U.S.	Environmental	Protection	Agency	(EPA)	draft final	rule	titled,

“Protection	of	Stratospheric	Ozone: Change	of	Listing	Status	for	Certain	Substitutes	Under

the	Significant	New	Alternatives	Policy	(SNAP)	Program,”	(RIN 2060-AS18)

Comment on Table 24 of Economic Analysis: Will EPA provide some type of explanation for the basis of 

the statement that 99% of small business manufacturers would experience no costs in complying with the 

rulemaking? The commenter expects that this might be true for end-users, but manufacturers need to 

perform R&D work, lab approvals, field evaluations and employee training etc. Below is the text from the 

analysis that is being referenced. 

Error! Reference source not found. aggregates the estimated economic impacts on small businesses, 

according to the categories set out in the SISNOSE decision matrix. For the most conservative assessment, 

Error! Reference source not found. reflects the higher cost ranges for each end-use and a 7% discount rate. 

Using the decision criteria established in Error! Reference source not found., this screening analysis 

suggests that this rulemaking can be presumed to have no SISNOSE for the following reasons:

 More than 99% of small businesses subject to this rulemaking would be expected to experience zero 

compliance costs.

 For about 120 small businesses that are expected to incur compliance costs as a result of this 

rulemaking, their costs are estimated to be less than 1% of annual sales.

 This analysis indicates that fewer than 80 of the nearly 500,000 affected small businesses—or 

<0.1%—could incur costs in excess of 1% of annual sales, and that fewer than 60 small businesses 

could incur costs in excess of 3% of annual sales. These estimates are below the thresholds for a 

substantial number determination (i.e., fewer than 100 businesses, and less than 20% of affected 

entities).
### §1408b. Authorization of loans, conveyances, etc., by government and municipalities

The government of the Virgin Islands, through its legislative assembly, may assist such authority with cash donations, loans, conveyances of real and personal property, facilities, and services, and otherwise, and may authorize municipalities and other subdivisions to make cash donations, loans, conveyances of real and personal property to such authority, and to take other action, including but not limited to, the making available or the furnishing of facilities and services, in aid of slum clearance, urban redevelopment, urban renewal, or low-rent housing projects.

(July 18, 1950, ch. 466, title III, §303, 64 Stat. 347; Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 783, title I, §107(5), 69 Stat. 638.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1955—Act Aug. 11, 1955, included urban renewal projects.
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWABS, INC.
                   ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES TRUST 2004-BC3
                  ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-BC3


      The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP (a
"Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16 of
the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

      (i)    A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
      preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer
      under the Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

      (ii)   To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master
      Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout
      such year.




/s/ Joseph M. Candelario                           Dated: March 29, 2005
------------------------

JOSEPH M. CANDELARIO
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Mark Wong                                      Dated: March 29, 2005
-------------

MARK WONG
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
#### Carlos Antonio ROBLES-DIAZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-73379.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 12, 2007.*

Filed March 16, 2007.

Ashwani K. Bhakhri, Esq., Law Offices of Ashwani K. Bhakhri, Burlingame, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Stacy S. Paddack, Kurt B. Larson, Esq. U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: KOZINSKI, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Carlos Antonio Robles-Diaz, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for *563review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen deportation proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. *See Konstanti-nova v. INS,*195 F.3d 528, 529 (9th Cir. 1999). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying as untimely Robles-Diaz’s motion to reopen, filed more than nine years after a final order of deportation was entered *in absentia. See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2)-(3) (a motion to reopen must be filed no later than 90 days after the final administrative decision, or on or before September 30, 1996, whichever is later); *In re M-S-,*22 I. & N. Dec. 349, 357 (BIA 1998) (en banc) (concluding that a motion to reopen to apply for a new form of relief must comply with the regular requirements for motions to reopen, including timeliness).

To the extent Robles-Diaz claims he received ineffective assistance of counsel, we do not consider the claim because he failed to raise it before the BIA. *Ontiveros-Lopez v. INS,*213 F.3d 1121, 1124 (9th Cir.2000) (petitioner must exhaust administrative remedies by presenting ineffective assistance of counsel claim to the BIA).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of FCStone Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Dunaway, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                                           
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/    WILLIAM J.
DUNAWAY                 
|    |  | William J. Dunaway Chief Financial Officer



Date:
November 19, 2008



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §10906. Exception

Notwithstanding section 10901 and subchapter II of chapter 113 of this title, and without the approval of the Board, a rail carrier providing transportation subject to the jurisdiction of the Board under this part may enter into arrangements for the joint ownership or joint use of spur, industrial, team, switching, or side tracks. The Board does not have authority under this chapter over construction, acquisition, operation, abandonment, or discontinuance of spur, industrial, team, switching, or side tracks.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §102(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 827.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 10907 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

A prior section 10906, Pub. L. 95–473, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1406, related to offering abandoned rail properties for sale for public purposes, prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a). See section 10905 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 134240 & (12) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134240 COA: 276922 Genesee CC: 05-016601-FH JONATHON ALLEN MAYBERRY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 30, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented shou ld be reviewed by this Cour t. The motion to remand to the trial court is DENIED.

K ELLY
, J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons given in her dissent in People v Conway , 474 Mich 1140 (2006).

p0830 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 10, 2007

Clerk
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
   In connection with this Annual Report of Equity Ventures Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Colette Kim, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of her knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1.
Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.
The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Equity Ventures Group, Inc.
  By: /s/Colette Kim
 Colette Kim,
 President, Chief Executive Officer,
 Chief Financial Officer, Secretary &
 Director
  March 12, 2010
### §§1405a, 1405b. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–357, title III, §307, Oct. 19, 1982, 96 Stat. 1709

Section 1405a, act June 22, 1936, ch. 699, §2, 49 Stat. 1807, related to division of Virgin Islands into municipality of Saint Croix and municipality of Saint Thomas and Saint John.

Section 1405b, act June 22, 1936, ch. 699, §3, 49 Stat. 1807, related to constituting into bodies politic and juridic of inhabitants of municipalities of Saint Croix and of Saint Thomas and Saint John.
### §70033. Limitation on application to foreign vessels

Except pursuant to international treaty, convention, or agreement, to which the United States is a party, subchapters I through III and this subchapter shall not apply to any foreign vessel that is not destined for, or departing from, a port or place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and that is in—

(1) innocent passage through the territorial sea of the United States; or

(2) transit through the navigable waters of the United States that form a part of an international strait.

(Added Pub. L. 115–282, title IV, §401(a), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4261; amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8507(a)(6), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4753.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "I through III" for "A through C" in introductory provisions.
### Part D—Negotiations To Pursue Privatization
§ 330.15 Participation requirements. To participate in the Multiclass Securities program, a participant must meet the following criteria: ( a ) *Certification.* A participant must submit such certifications and other documents as are required by the Multiclass Guide.
( b ) *Compliance with Multiclass Guide.* By completing a multiclass securities transaction, a participant is deemed to have represented and warranted to the Association that it has complied with, and that it agrees to comply with, the Multiclass Guide in effect as of the date that the Association's guaranty is placed on the securities.
( c ) *Material changes in status.* A participant must report, as required in the Multiclass Guide, material adverse changes in status including voluntary and non-voluntary termination, defaults, fines and findings of material non-conformance with rules and policies of state and federal agencies and federal government sponsored enterprises.
( d ) *Integrity.* The participant must conduct its business operations in accordance with industry practices, ethics and standards, and maintain its books and records in an appropriate manner, as determined by the Association.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2503-0030)
#### James Panico, as a Professional Fire Fighter and Member of the Fairview Fire District, Appellant, v Donald R. Young et al., Constituting the Fire Commissioners of the Fairview Fire District, Respondents.

In a proceeding, *inter alia,*to (1) declare that petitioner is entitled to the rights, benefits and protection of section 207-a of the General Municipal Law and (2) stay the respondents from holding a disciplinary hearing, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated June 21, *10521977, which denied the application. Judgment modified, on the law, by adding thereto a provision declaring that petitioner is not entitled to the rights, benefits and protection of section 207-a of the General Municipal Law. As so modified, judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements payable to respondents (see *Lanza v Wagner,*11 NY2d 317, 334). It is clear that the recent amendment of section 207-a of the General Municipal Law (L 1977, ch 965, § 1), when viewed in the light of the surrounding circumstances and the controversies that had arisen as to the interpretation of that statute prior to its amendment, must be construed as explanatory of the ambiguities over which such controversies arose (see McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 1, Statutes, § 193, subd b). The amendment makes it clear that appellant’s contention—that section 207-a cannot be read as providing that an injured fireman should never have to perform any duty at all until he is 100% capable of performing all of the duties of his position—is without basis. Titone, J. P., Suozzi, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 888
Editorial Note: For revisions and amendments affecting Schedules A, B, C, and D, issued under part 888, but not carried in the Code of Federal Regulations, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 888.420 One-time Contract Rent determination. ( a ) *Determining the amount of the new Contract Rent.* Project owners eligible for retroactive payments, as described in § 888.401(c), may request a one-time Contract Rent determination, to be effective as described in paragraph (c) of this section. The request for a one-time rent determination must be made when submitting a request for retroactive payments, as described in § 888.415. If no claim for retroactive payments is made, an owner may submit only the request for a one-time rent determination, provided the owner is eligible for retroactive payments. The new Contract Rent under this provision will be the greater of: ( 1 ) The Contract Rent currently approved by the PHA; or
( 2 ) An amount equal to the Contract Rent as adjusted to May 31, 1991 under § 888.405(a).
( b ) *Currently approved rent.* The Contract Rent currently approved by the PHA is the Contract Rent stated in the most recent amendment to the HAP Contract signed by both the PHA and the owner.
( c ) *Effective date of new Contract Rent.* The new Contract Rent, determined under paragraph (a) of this section, will be effective on May 31, 1991.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2502-0042)