alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **CHAPTER 223—CAPITAL GRANTS FOR CLASS II AND CLASS III RAILROADS**

Sec.
22301.
Capital grants for class II and class III railroads.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2007**—Pub. L. 110–140, title XI, §1112(a), Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1758, substituted "CAPITAL GRANTS FOR CLASS II AND CLASS III RAILROADS" for "LIGHT DENSITY RAIL LINE PILOT PROJECTS" in chapter heading and "Capital grants for class II and class III railroads" for "Light density rail line pilot projects" in item 22301.
#### KENNEDY et al., Respondents, v. PLACE et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 27, 1905.)

Action by Georgiana Estelle Kennedy and Catherine A. Downing against David H. M. Place and others.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

JENKS, J., dissents.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the report) for the purpose of complying with
Rule 13a14(b) or Rule 15d14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Ray C. Dillon, the Chief Executive Officer, and Kenneth D. Mann, the Chief Financial Officer, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

condition and results of operations of Deltic Timber Corporation.



/s/ Ray C. DillonRay C. DillonChief Executive OfficerAugust 6, 2009/s/ Kenneth D. MannKenneth D. MannChief Financial OfficerAugust 6, 2009
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Reportof Cloud Medical Doctor Software Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2011 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Pamela Thompson, Principle FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:
#### In the Matter of Louis O’Dierna, Appellant, v. Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Hempstead, Respondent.

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review and annul a determination of the Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Hempstead, which denied petitioner’s application for a special exception to the local zoning ordinance so as to permit him to harbor racing pigeons upon his property, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 24, 1960, which confirmed the board’s determination and dismissed his petition. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### Hedy Broatman, an Infant, v. Leonard Broatman et al.

Motion to dismiss appeal as against respondents, Willis Johnson, Jr. and Sara E. Knight, granted, with $10 costs. Motion to dismiss appeal as against respondent, Leonard Broatman, granted, with $10 costs. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
### PART B—COMMERCIAL
### Bauxite deposits of the Springvale district, Georgia

By: Lorin D. Clark

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1199F

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Guide to prospecting in the Springvale bauxite district, Georgia(1943)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
**Exhibit 32.1** 

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Reportof Cloud Medical Doctor Software Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending December 31, 2014as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael De La Garza, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operationsof the Company.
www.jrtechnologies.com

U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590

DOCKET: DOT

- OST

- 2013

- 0048 APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF IATA RESOLUTION 787
22

- April

- 203

Dear Sir, Dear Madam

,

We are writing to you in support of the Travel Industry New Distribution Capability (NDC). JR Technologies is a small business concern primarily engaged in software development and providing back office services to the travel i ndustry.

From a technology p rovider’s perspective, NDC opens vast new business opportunities for competing technologies and innovation. More immediately , i n today’s environment

a irlines are developing new capa bilities for their own websites without following any particular standard. This state of affairs potentially requires us to develop as many direct connect solutions as there are airlines. This is not an economically viable scenario and prevents our travel agency customers from competing with airlines’ own web sites and most impor tantly from providing their passengers with specific information regarding the flights and services and amenities that are available for consideration.

NDC offer s a standard through which we would have access to a reliable information

stream . This enables our customers to compete by offer ing content rich dynamic information to consumers faster and cheaper and to provide co nsumer s with more information about fare alternatives, ancillary services, and on board amenities . As a

common XML based data tr ansmission standard

, NDC will make it easier for us to access airline data and build applications allowing our customers to better compare and contrast complete airline offers

.

Sincerely,

George Khairallah
President From the Desk of George Khairallah
Tel: +1

- 248

- 686

- 9822

24701 Swanson Road Southfield, MI 48033
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

JAMES KING, *

* No. 13

- 962V

Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran

*

v. * Filed: August 29 , 2014

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Attorneys’ fees and costs; award

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * in the amount to which

* respondent does not object.

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

William E. Cochran , Jr.

, Black, McLaren, et al.

, Memphis, TN, for petitioner;

Darryl R. Wishard , United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for

respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION ON FEES AND COSTS 1

On August 22, 2014, petitioner filed a stipulation of fact concerning final

attorneys’ fees and costs in the above

- captioned matter. Previously, petitioner

informally submitted a draft application for attorneys’ fees and costs to respondent

for review. Upon review of petitioner’s application, respondent raised objections

to certain items. Based on subsequent disc ussions, petitioner amended his

application to request $21,000.00 , an amount to which respondent does not object.

The Court awards this amount.

On Decem

ber 6, 2013

, James King filed a petition for compensation alleging

that the influenza vaccine, which he received on October 14, 2012, caused him to

suffer from a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) in his

left shoulder. Petitioner received compensation based upon respondent’s proffer

.

1 T he E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17,

2002), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b),

the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical inf ormation or other

information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special

master will appear in the document posted on the website.2

Decision

, issued June 30, 2014 . Because petitioner received compensation, he is

entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(e).

Petitioner seeks a total of $ 21,000.00 in atto rneys’ fees and costs for his

counsel. Additionally, in compliance with General Order No. 9, petitioner states

that he incurred no out

- of

- pocket litigation expenses while pursuing this claim.

Respondent has no objection to the amount requested for attorneys’ fees and costs.

After reviewing the request, the Court awards the following:

A lump sum of $ 21,000.00 in the form of a check made payable to

petitioner and petitioner’s attorney, William E. Cochran of the law firm

Black McLaren Jones Ryland & Griffee, for attorneys’ fees and other

litigation costs available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(e).

The Court thanks the parties for their cooperative efforts in resolving this

matter. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly

.

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Mary Holmes, at (202) 357

-

6353.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master
#### Robert Hogan, an Infant, by Margaret Hogan, His Guardian ad Litem, et al., Respondents, v. Salvatore J. Ciancimino, as Administrator of the Estate of Henry Beyers, Deceased, Appellant.

Motion by appellant to stay the assessment of damages, pending a determination of the appeal, granted on condition that appellant argue or submit the appeal at the November Term, beginning October 31, 1960. The appeal is ordered to be placed on the calendar for said term. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before October 20, 1960. Nolan, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Christopher Romano, Appellant, v. Robert E. Murphy, as Warden of Auburn Prison, Respondent.

Motion granted and time for argument of appeal enlarged to include term commencing September *5,*1962.
|                                                             |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                             |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Mine or Operating Name/MSHA Identification Number | Section 104 S&S Citations | Section 104(b) Orders | Section 104(d) Citations and Orders | Section 110(b)(2) Violations | Section 107(a) Orders | ProposedMSHAAssessments (1) | Mining Related Fatalities | Received Notice of Pattern of Violations Under Section 104(e) (yes/no) | Received Notice of Potential to Have Pattern Under Section 104(e) (yes/no) | Legal Actions Pending as of Last Day of Period | Legal Actions Initiated During Period | Legal Actions Resolved During Period |
| Morgan City Grinding Plant/1601357                          | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $ | — |  | 0 | N | N | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Argenta Mine and Mill/2601152                               | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $ | 848 |  | 0 | N | N | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Corpus Christi Grinding Plant/4103112                       | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $ | — |  | 0 | N | N | 0 | 0 | 0 |

|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | Amounts included are the total dollar value of proposed assessments received from MSHA on or before December 31, 2016 for citations and orders occurring during the year ended December 31, 2016, regardless of whether the assessment has been challenged or appealed.  Citations and orders can be contested and appealed, and as part of that process, are sometimes reduced in severity and amount, and sometimes dismissed.  The number of citations, orders, and proposed assessments vary by inspector and also vary depending on the size and type of the operation. |
### Geology and Uranium deposits of Montezuma Canyon area, San Juan County, Utah

By: L.C. HuffF. G. Lesure

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1190

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**          I, Denise Barton, Chief Financial Officer of American Casino & Entertainment Properties LLC(the Registrant), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the annualreport on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 of the Registrant (the Report): (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.     By: /s/ Denise Barton         Denise Barton    Senior Vice President, Chief Financial    Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of    American Casino & Entertainment Properties LLC  Date:March 26, 2008
Exhibit
4.1


 


SPECIMEN
ORDINARY SHARE CERTIFICATE


 


	CERTIFICATE NUMBER	SHARES
    _________
	 	CUSIP: [●]


 





MOOLEC SCIENCE SA


INCORPORATED
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE GRAND DUCHY OF LUXEMBOURG


ORDINARY SHARE




 


THIS
CERTIFIES THAT [NAME OF HOLDER]


IS
INSCRIBED IN THE SHARE REGISTER OF THE COMPANY AS THE HOLDER OF [NUMBER OF SHARES]

 ORDINARY SHARES


 


OF $0.01 NOMINAL VALUE


MOOLEC SCIENCE SA


 


a public limited liability company (société anonyme)
governed by the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, having its registered office at 17, Boulevard F.W. Raiffeisen, L-2411 Luxembourg,
Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, and registered with the Luxembourg Trade and Companies’ Register (Registre de Commerce et des Sociétés,
Luxembourg) under number B 268440 (the “Company”) by showing the number of shares registered in the name of its owner
in the shareholders’ register of the Company.


 


In
accordance with Luxembourg law, only the registration in the share register of the Company evidences the ownership of shares.


 


Moolec Science SA


 


	By	 	 	By	 
	 	Name:		 	 	Name:
	 	Title: 	Director	 	 	Title: 	Director
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By	 	 	 
	 	Name:	 	 	 
	 	Title: 	Director
§ 884.109 Rent adjustments. ( a ) *Funding of adjustments.* Housing assistance payments will be made in increased amounts commensurate with Contract Rent adjustments under this paragraph, up to the maximum amount authorized under the Contract. (See §§ 884.104 and 884.105).
( b ) *Automatic annual adjustments.* ( 1 ) Automatic Annual Adjustment Factors will be determined by HUD at least annually; interim revisions may be made as market conditions warrant. Such Factors and the basis for their determination will be published in the Federal Register. These published Factors will be reduced appropriately by HUD where utilities are paid directly by Families.
( 2 ) On each anniversary date of the Contract, the Contract Rents shall be adjusted by applying the applicable Automatic Annual Adjustment Factor most recently published by HUD. Contract Rents may be adjusted upward or downward, as may be appropriate; however, in no case shall the adjusted rents be less than the Contract Rents on the effective date of the Contract.
( c ) *Special additional adjustments.* Special additional adjustments shall be granted, when approved by HUD, to reflect increases in the actual and necessary expenses of owning and maintaining the Contract Units which have resulted from substantial general increases in real property taxes, utility rates, or similar costs (i.e., assessments, and utilities not covered by regulated rates), but only if and to the extent that the Owner clearly demonstrates that such general increases have caused increases in the Owner's operating costs which are not adequately compensated for by automatic annual adjustments. The Owner shall submit to HUD financial statements which clearly support the increase.
( d ) *Overall limitation.* Notwithstanding any other provisions of this part, adjustments as provided in this section shall not result in material differences between the rents charged for assisted and comparable unassisted units, as determined by HUD: *Provided, however,* That this limitation shall not be construed to prohibit differences in rents between assisted and comparable unassisted units to the extent that such differences may have existed with respect to the initial Contract Rents.
MEMORANDUM TO FILE

TO: File

FROM: Colleen McKaughan

Date: January 8, 2014

Subject: Record of Conference Call with the Tohono O’odham Nation (TON) in 

advance of Public Comment Period

1. Participants in the Conference Call 

 TON: Cornelius Antone, Acting Director, TON Environmental Protection Agency; Aaran 

Udensi, TON EPA Environmental Specialist

 EPA, Region 9 : Colleen McKaughan, Associate Director; Maeve Clancy, Project Officer 

2. General Statement of the Topic of Discussion:

 EPA updated TON regarding two pending EPA proposals – the proposed action on the Maricopa 

County Nonattainment Area PM-10 Five Percent Plan and the proposed redesignation of 

Maricopa County to attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard, and approval of the 

maintenance plan

 EPA wanted to alert TON to these pending actions and respond to their questions, and make sure 

they had the opportunity to participate in the public comment process. EPA offered to make 

themselves available for consultation, if requested.

 While these actions involve state plans and control measures, which do not apply on reservation 

land, they do reflect an improvement in air quality which should benefit the tribes in Maricopa 

County.

 TON now has reservation land in the City of Glendale in Maricopa County so the Tribe 

considers themselves to be impacted by actions in Maricopa County. This was confirmed by 

EPA on the January 8th call.

 The Tribe asked if a letter could be sent to the Tribal Chairman’s Office about these actions. 

EPA responded that we can send one; the Tribe just needs to ask.
#### § 990.320 Audits.

All PHAs that receive financial assistance under this part shall submit an acceptable audit and comply with the audit requirements in 2 CFR part 200, subpart F.

[70 FR 54997, Sept. 19, 2005, as amended at 80 FR 75943, Dec. 7, 2015]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IMPSAT Fiber Networks on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ricardo A. Verdaguer, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

1. The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

Date: May 15, 2006



/s/ RICARDO A. VERDAGUERRicardo A. Verdaguer President and Chief Executive Officer