alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2   Certification of CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Tumbleweed Communications Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), Gregory M. Capitolo, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:  (1)           The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)           The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Gregory M. CapitoloGregory M. CapitoloChief Financial OfficerNovember 14, 2002  This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT 4.3.18


                            CERTIFICATE OF SECRETARY

         I, JOHN M. LOWBER, the duly elected and acting Secretary of General
Communication, Inc., an Alaska corporation, do hereby certify and declare that
(i) the resolution of the Board of Directors contained in the minutes of its
meeting attached hereto as Exhibit 4.3.18A is a true and correct copy of that
resolution as contained in those minutes duly adopted by the Board of Directors
of General Communication, Inc. at its meeting held on December 5, 2002, and (ii)
the Amendment No. 4 to the plan attached hereto as Exhibit 4.3.18B is a true and
correct copy of that amendment prepared at the direction of, and executed by,
the officer so indicated, dated December 23, 2002, to implement the intent of
the board's December 5, 2002 resolution.

         Executed this 24 day of June, 2003 at Anchorage, Alaska.

                                        GENERAL COMMUNICATION, INC.


                                        By: /s/
                                           John M. Lowber, Secretary


         SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this 24 day of June, 2003.



                                  /s/ C. Mills
                                  Notary Public in and for Alaska
                                  My Commission Expires: May 17, 2006
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF THE CD cod -Her PERSONAL RESTRAINT OF: ) No. 71888-6-1 fV> C3~„ 

## RICHARD LEESCALES, ' DIVISION ONE CD
Petitioner. UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED: October 20, 2014 V? o CO —'C3
PerCuriam. Richard Scales challenges hisjudgment and sentence in King 

### County SuperiorCourt No. 09-1-06193-5 SEA, claiming his term ofconfinement in combination with his term ofcommunity custody exceeds the applicable statutory 

### maximum forcount III, thirddegree assault. On April 9, 2010, the trial court imposed 

### standard range sentences of116 months for firstdegree unlawful possession of a firearm, 84 months for residential burglary, and 60 months for thirddegree assault. The court also imposed a community custodyterm of 12 months for a crime against person under RCW 9.94A.411, which could apply only to the third degree assault. 

### We acceptthe State's concession that the trial courtexceeded its authority in sentencing Scales to a term of communitycustody in addition to a standard range term ofconfinement of 60 months for third degree assault. See RCW 9.94A.701(9). Because Scales was sentenced inApril 2010, the trial court, not Department of 

### Corrections, has the obligation to reduce the term of community custodyto avoid a sentence inexcess of the statutory maximum. State v. Boyd, 174 Wn.2d 470, 275 P.3d 321 (2012): see also State v. Winborne, 167 Wn. App. 320, 329, 273 P.3d 454, reviewNo. 71888-6-1/2 denied, 174 Wn.2d 1019 (2012). Accordingly, we remand to the trial courtto amend the community custody term consistent with RCW 9.94A.701(9) to zero. See Boyd, 174 Wn.2d at 473. Remanded.

For the court:
Complete the following tables for each sampling pointPlant NameSampleCollectionNumberDate of SampleCollectionSample CollectionTime Temperature (°C)pH(S.U.)Set 1 - Grab 1Set 1 - Grab 2Set 1 - Grab 3Set 1 - Grab 4Set 2 - Grab 1Set 2 - Grab 2Set 2 - Grab 3Set 2 - Grab 4Set 3 - Grab 1Set 3 - Grab 2Set 3 - Grab 3Set 3 - Grab 4Set 4 - Grab 1Set 4 - Grab 2Set 4 - Grab 3Set 4 - Grab 4NOTE: For influent (sour water) samples, only the grab 1 row needs to be completed.Plant NameSampleCollectionNumberSour WaterSamplesCollected asGrabs(Yes or No)Mercury and CyanideSamples Collected asGrabs(Yes or No)RCC DistillateSamples (ExceptMercury & Cyanide)Collected as 24-HourComposites(Yes or No)Tyvek Suits used(Yes or No)Dust MasksUsed forMercury(Yes or No)CleanHands/DirtyHandsSamplingTechniquesUsed(Yes or No)Description ofSample CollectionTechnique (ifdifferent thaninstructions)Description ofAbnormal Conditions inGasifier, Sour Water, orVapor Crystallizer(RCC) Systems thatMay ImpactProcess/WastewaterCharacteristicsSet 1Set 2Set 3Set 4

# Daily Power Generation (MW-hrs)

Plant Name Date Provide the daily power generation for the IGCC unit starting two weeks prior to the first set of

samples through the last set of samplesSour Water Feed toTreatment(D-162)Sour Water Feed toTreatment(E-166A/B)Sour Water Returnfrom Sulfur Recovery(V-241)Sour Water Feed toSulfur Recovery(C-240)Sour Water Feed toVapor Crystallizer(RCC) Evaporator(E-277)Sour Water toSlurry Makeup(T-100)Brine from BrineCollection Tank T279 to Drum DryerRCC EvaporatorDistillateProvide the average flow rate in the Gasification wastewater treatment system for each stream included in the table starting two weeks prior to the first set of samples through the last set of samplesBrine SolidsOutput from DrumDryer (tons/day)Plant Name DateSour Water & Treatment System Flow Rates(gpd)
### §1406j. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 649

Section, act June 22, 1936, ch. 699, §38, 49 Stat. 1817, provided for citizenship of officials and for oath of office.
----

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November 8, 2010 |   /s/ G. Wilson Hughes |
|------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                   | G. Wilson Hughes            |
|                   | Chief Executive Officer     |
|                   | GCI, Inc.                   |

----
### §53504. Deposits and withdrawals

(a) Required Deposits.—An agreement to establish a capital construction fund shall provide for the deposit in the fund of the amounts agreed to be appropriate to provide for qualified withdrawals under section 53509 of this title.

(b) Applicable Requirements.—Deposits in and withdrawals from the fund are subject to the requirements included in the agreement or prescribed by the Secretary by regulation. However, the Secretary may not require a person to deposit in the fund for a taxable year more than 50 percent of that portion of the person's taxable income for that year (as determined under section 53505(a)(1) of this title) that is attributable to the operation of an agreement vessel.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1593.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 53504(a) | 46 App.:1177(a) (2d sentence related to deposits). | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title VI, §607(a) (2d sentence related to deposits), (last sentence), 49 Stat. 2005; June 23, 1938, ch. 600, §§23–28, 52 Stat. 960; Aug. 4, 1939, ch. 417, §10, 53 Stat. 1185; July 17, 1952, ch. 939, §§17–19, 66 Stat. 764; Pub. L. 85–637, Aug. 14, 1958, 72 Stat. 216; Pub. L. 86–518, §1, June 12, 1960, 74 Stat. 216; Pub. L. 87–45, §6, May 27, 1961, 75 Stat. 91; Pub. L. 87–271, Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat. 570; restated Pub. L. 91–469, §21(a), Oct. 21, 1970, 84 Stat. 1026; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(97)(A), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 162. |
| 53504(b) | 46 App.:1177(a) (last sentence). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "agreed to be appropriate" are substituted for "agreed upon as necessary or appropriate" to eliminate unnecessary words.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In connection  with the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report of Radale Imports,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2006 (the
"Report"),  I, Lee D. Dodson,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  hereby
certify that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: February 6, 2007
                                                         /s/ Lee D. Dodson
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Lee D. Dodson
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


     The above  certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.











                                                                    Exhibit 32.1
§ 75.19 Requirements. ( a ) *Employment and training.* ( 1 ) To the greatest extent feasible, and consistent with existing Federal, state, and local laws and regulations, recipients covered by this subpart shall ensure that employment and training opportunities arising in connection with Section 3 projects are provided to Section 3 workers within the metropolitan area (or nonmetropolitan county) in which the project is located.
( 2 ) Where feasible, priority for opportunities and training described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section should be given to: ( i ) Section 3 workers residing within the service area or the neighborhood of the project, and
( ii ) Participants in YouthBuild programs.
( b ) *Contracting.* ( 1 ) To the greatest extent feasible, and consistent with existing Federal, state, and local laws and regulations, recipients covered by this subpart shall ensure contracts for work awarded in connection with Section 3 projects are provided to business concerns that provide economic opportunities to Section 3 workers residing within the metropolitan area (or nonmetropolitan county) in which the project is located.
( 2 ) Where feasible, priority for contracting opportunities described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section should be given to: ( i ) Section 3 business concerns that provide economic opportunities to Section 3 workers residing within the service area or the neighborhood of the project, and
( ii ) YouthBuild programs.
#### FLEMING, Respondent, v. BROWN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June Term, 1903.)

Action by John Fleming against Charles A. Brown.

No opinion. Order reversed, and matter remitted to Special Term, without costs.
### **CHAPTER 205—SIGNAL SYSTEMS**

Sec.
20501.
Definition.
20502.
Requirements for installation and use.
20503.
Amending regulations and changing requirements.
20504.
Inspection, testing, and investigation.
20505.
Reports of malfunctions and accidents.
### §20304. Assumption of risk by employees

An employee of a railroad carrier injured by a vehicle or train used in violation of section 20302(a)(1)(A), (2), (4), or (5)(A) of this title does not assume the risk of injury resulting from the violation, even if the employee continues to be employed by the carrier after learning of the violation.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 883.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20304 | 45:7. | Mar. 2, 1893, ch. 196, §8, 27 Stat. 532; June 22, 1988, Pub. L. 100–342, §13(1)(H), 102 Stat. 631. |
| | 45:8 (words before 16th comma). | Mar. 2, 1903, ch. 976, §1 (words before 23d comma), 32 Stat. 943; June 22, 1988, Pub. L. 100–342, §13(2)(A), 102 Stat. 631. |

Section

The words "after learning of the violation" are substituted for "after the unlawful use of such locomotive, car, or train had been brought to his knowledge" in 45:7 for clarity.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA Review of Function Allocation and En Route Separation AssuranceToday's air traffic control system has reached a limit to the number of aircraft that can be safely managed at the same time. This air traffic capacity bottleneck is a critical problem along the path to modernization for air transportation. The design of the next separation assurance system to address this problem is a cornerstone of air traffic management research today. This report reviews recent work by NASA and others in the areas of function allocation and en route separation assurance. This includes: separation assurance algorithms and technology prototypes; concepts of operations and designs for advanced separation assurance systems; and specific investigations into air-ground and human-automation function allocation.Document ID20160014857Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsLewis, Timothy A.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Aweiss, Arwa S.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Guerreiro, Nelson M.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Daiker, Ronald J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredDecember 22, 2016Publication DateNovember 1, 2016Subject CategoryAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2016-219343L-20745NF1676L-25313Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 999182.02.20.07.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20160014857.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          46,447
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,980
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,561
<PP&E>                                           9,712
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,711
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,576
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,569
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            26
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,857
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,576
<SALES>                                          6,610
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,610
<CGS>                                            2,248
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,248
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,552
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  39
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,534)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        88
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,622)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,622)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.73)


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

GERALD WASHINGTON,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA, CRIMINAL DIVISION,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 43 EM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 31st day of May

, 2017, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process is GRANTED

, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED

.
Exhibit 10.32



AMENDMENT TO

SUBORDINATION LOAN AGREEMENT

AND PROMISSORY NOTE

DATED JUNE 30, 2004

BY AND BETWEEN

GERALD HIRSCH

AND

FCSTONE, LLC (BORROWER)

IN THE
AMOUNT OF $500,000.00

ORIGINALLY MATURING JUNE 30, 2005



We, the undersigned, being all of the parties to the above described Subordinated Loan Agreement (Agreement) and
Promissory Note (Note) related thereto, hereby mutually agree and consent to amend said Agreement and Note as follows:



Effective June 30, 2006, the Maturity Date on the above mentioned Agreement and Note shall be extended to June 30, 2007.



All other terms, provisions and conditions of the above mentioned Agreement
and Note shall remain unaltered and in full force and effect.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned place their respective signatures on this May 15, 2006.



FCStone, LLC

|    |  |                                                |  |  |  |  |  |                  
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------
|    |  |                                                |  | 
|    |  |                                                |  | 
|By: |  | /s/ Clarence C. Delbridge                      |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Gerald Hirsch
|    |  | Clarence C. Delbridge Executive Vice President |  |  |  |  |  | Gerald Hirsch
REVERSE and REMAND; and Opinion Filed April 2, 2013.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-12-00051-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E.L.B., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366-52691-07

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices FitzGerald, Lang-Miers, and Murphy 

Opinion by Justice Murphy

This appeal arises out of an order in a suit to modify the parent child relationship, signed 

by the trial court on October 19, 2011. After the appeal was submitted, we abated the appeal and 

ordered the parties to attend mediation. 

The parties have jointly filed a “Mediated Settlement Agreement” in which they informed 

the Court they have agreed to settle their dispute. Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, we reverse 

the trial court’s October 19, 2011 order and remand the case to the trial court with instructions to 

enter an agreed order based upon the terms set forth in the Mediated Settlement Agreement.

120051F.P05

/Mary Murphy/

MARY MURPHY

JUSTICE
2

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF E.L.B., A CHILD,

No. 05-12-00051-CV

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District 

Court, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366-52691-07.

Opinion delivered by Justice Murphy. 

Justices FitzGerald and Lang-Miers 

participating.

In accordance with the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s October 19, 2011 

order is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED to the trial court with instructions to enter 

an agreed order based upon the terms set forth in the March 25, 2013 Mediated Settlement 

Agreement signed by Christina Bouchard and Jason Bouchard. We ORDER that each party 

bear its own costs of appeal.

Judgment entered this 2nd day of April, 2013.

/Mary Murphy/

MARY MURPHY

JUSTICE
### §903. Congressional Record: daily and permanent forms

The public proceedings of each House of Congress as reported by the Official Reporters, shall be printed in the Congressional Record, which shall be issued in daily form during each session and shall be revised, printed, and bound promptly, as directed by the Joint Committee on Printing, in permanent form, for distribution during and after the close of each session of Congress. The daily and the permanent Record shall bear the same date, which shall be that of the actual day's proceedings reported. The "usual number" of the Congressional Record may not be printed.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1256.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §182a (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §14, as added June 20, 1936, ch. 630, title II, §2, 49 Stat. 1546).
§ 964.410 Additional definitions. The following additional definitions apply to this subpart only: *Directly assisted.* Directly assisted means a public housing resident or a recipient of housing assistance in the tenant-based section 8 program. Direct assistance does not include any State financed housing assistance or Section 8 project-based assistance.
*Eligible resident.* An eligible resident is a person: ( 1 ) Who is directly assisted by a public housing agency;
( 2 ) Whose name appears on the lease; and
( 3 ) Is eighteen years of age or older.
*Governing board.* Governing board means the board of directors or similar governing body of a public housing agency.
*Resident board member.* A resident board member is a member of the governing board who is directly assisted by that public housing agency.
### §1722. Sense of Congress

It is the sense of Congress that—

(1) a broadband connection and digital literacy are increasingly critical to how individuals—

(A) participate in the society, economy, and civic institutions of the United States; and

(B) access health care and essential services, obtain education, and build careers;

(2) digital exclusion—

(A) carries a high societal and economic cost;

(B) materially harms the opportunity of an individual with respect to the economic success, educational achievement, positive health outcomes, social inclusion, and civic engagement of that individual; and

(C) exacerbates existing wealth and income gaps, especially those experienced by covered populations;

(3) achieving digital equity for all people of the United States requires additional and sustained investment and research efforts;

(4) the Federal Government, as well as State, tribal, territorial, and local governments, have made social, legal, and economic obligations that necessarily extend to how the citizens and residents of those governments access and use the internet; and

(5) achieving digital equity is a matter of social and economic justice and is worth pursuing.

(Pub. L. 117–58, div. F, title III, §60303, Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1212.)