alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                     Exhibit 8.1
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           PERCENTAGE
                                                              COUNTRY OF    OWNERSHIP
NAME                                                        INCORPORATION   INTEREST
----                                                        -------------  ----------
<S>                                                         <C>            <C>
Fortune Software (Beijing) Co., Ltd                             China          100
China Finance Online (Beijing) Co., Ltd.                        China          100
Beijing Fuhua Innovation Technology Development Co., Ltd.*      China          100
Stockstar Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd            China          100
Shanghai Meining Computer Software Co., Ltd.                    China          100
Zhengning Information & Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.         China          100
Shenzhen Genius Information Technology Co., Ltd.                China          100
Jujin Software (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.                             China          100
</TABLE>

*    Denotes variable interest entity
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 99.11



             TURBODYNE SETS NEW DATE FOR ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER MEETING


CARPINTERIA, CA - MARCH 1, 2000 - The Board of Directors of Turbodyne
Technologies Inc. (EASDAQ:TRBD) has reset the Annual Shareholder Meeting for
Friday, May 12, 2000 at 1:30 PM at the Miramar Hotel, 1555 S. Jameson Lane,
Santa Barbara-Montecito, CA. The Board of Directors and management invite
Turbodyne's shareholders to attend the meeting. Turbodyne regrets the
inconvenience of the postponement which is intended to allow the shareholders
adequate time to review Turbodyne's 1999 annual report. The annual report will
be mailed together with the proxy statement on or about April 7, 2000 to
shareholders of record as of March 31, 2000.

Shareholders considering attending the meeting are encouraged to pre-register by
e-mail via Turbodyne's website. Information about the Miramar Hotel can be found
at http://www.sbmiramar.com. Shareholders requiring accommodations are invited
to contact the Miramar Hotel, telephone: 805-969-2203, and to mention that they
are attending Turbodyne's Annual Shareholder Meeting.

Turbodyne Technologies Inc., a California based high technology company,
specializes in the development of charging technology for internal combustion
engines plus the development and manufacturing of high-tech assemblies for
electrically assisted turbochargers and superchargers. Turbodyne Technologies
Inc.'s headquarters is located in Carpinteria, CA; the European business
location is Frankfurt, Germany. Additional information about the company is
available on the Internet at http://www.turbodyne.com.

Contacts:

Corporate Communications, Peter Weichselbraun (800) 566-1130
VP Group Finance - Investor Relations, Ken Fitzpatrick (800) 566-1130
European Investor Relations, Markus Kumbrink +49-69-975-44-665
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2929 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2929

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide the same type of 
vocational rehabilitation benefits and services under laws administered 
 by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for certain children with spina 
 bifida as are currently available to veterans with service-connected 
                             disabilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 2005

  Mr. Walsh introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide the same type of 
vocational rehabilitation benefits and services under laws administered 
 by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for certain children with spina 
 bifida as are currently available to veterans with service-connected 
                             disabilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION FOR CHILDREN WITH SPINA BIFIDA.

    Section 1804(c)(1) of title 38, United States Code, is amended to 
read as follows:
    ``(c)(1) Subject to paragraph (2), a vocational training program 
for a child under this section may include the services and assistance 
described in section 3104 of this title.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                       Exhibit 11

                        STOICO RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.

                     COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                                  Twelve Weeks Ended    Forty Weeks Ended
                                -------------------------------------------
                                October 1, October 3,  October 1, October 3,
                                   1996      1995        1996       1995
                                ---------- ----------  ---------- ----------
Weighted average common
 shares outstanding              4,307,027  3,230,751   4,266,231  3,180,405

Effect of common stock issued
 or common stock options
 granted during the twelve-month 
 period prior to the initial
 public offering:                  
   Common stock issued                   -     927,546     32,187    927,546
   Common stock options granted      8,834       8,834      8,834      8,834
                                  --------    --------    -------   --------

Total weighted average of
  common and common
  equivalent shares              4,315,861   4,167,131  4,307,252  4,116,785
                                 ---------   ---------  ---------  ---------
Net loss                        $(576,791)   (259,567) (1,558,639) (734,448)

Loss per share                  $    (.13)       (.06)       (.36)     (.18)
                                ----------   --------- ----------- ---------

                                   -19-
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

**Chief ExecutiveOfficer Certification pursuant to**

**Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Ricardo A. Verdaguer, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IMPSAT Fiber Networks, Inc. (the“Registrant”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared,

 

(b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8283(June 5, 2003)], 

 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of theRegistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation, and

 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to aversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

/s/ Ricardo A. Verdaguer

Ricardo A. Verdaguer 

President and Chief Executive Officer 

 

May 17, 2004
### **CHAPTER 161—CIVIL AND CRIMINAL PENALTIES**

Sec.
16101.
General civil penalties.
16102.
Recordkeeping and reporting violations.
16103.
Unlawful disclosure of information.
16104.
Disobedience to subpenas.
16105.
General criminal penalty when specific penalty not provided.
16106.
Punishment of corporation for violations committed by certain individuals.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–287, §5(46), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3393, struck out duplicative chapter heading.
### §40301. Application

(a) Ocean Common Carrier Agreements.—This part applies to an agreement between or among ocean common carriers to—

(1) discuss, fix, or regulate transportation rates, including through rates, cargo space accommodations, and other conditions of service;

(2) pool or apportion traffic, revenues, earnings, or losses;

(3) allot ports or regulate the number and character of voyages between ports;

(4) regulate the volume or character of cargo or passenger traffic to be carried;

(5) engage in an exclusive, preferential, or cooperative working arrangement between themselves or with a marine terminal operator;

(6) control, regulate, or prevent competition in international ocean transportation; or

(7) discuss and agree on any matter related to a service contract.

(b) Marine Terminal Operator Agreements.—This part applies to an agreement between or among marine terminal operators, or between or among one or more marine terminal operators and one or more ocean common carriers, to—

(1) discuss, fix, or regulate rates or other conditions of service; or

(2) engage in exclusive, preferential, or cooperative working arrangements, to the extent the agreement involves ocean transportation in the foreign commerce of the United States.

(c) Acquisitions.—This part does not apply to an acquisition by any person, directly or indirectly, of any voting security or assets of any other person.

(d) Maritime Labor Agreements.—This part does not apply to a maritime labor agreement. However, this subsection does not exempt from this part any rate, charge, regulation, or practice of a common carrier that is required to be set forth in a tariff or is an essential term of a service contract, whether or not the rate, charge, regulation, or practice arises out of, or is otherwise related to, a maritime labor agreement.

(e) Assessment Agreements.—This part (except sections 40305 and 40307(a)) does not apply to an assessment agreement.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §7, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1528.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 40301(a) | 46 App.:1703(a). | Pub. L. 98–237, §4, Mar. 20, 1984, 98 Stat. 70; Pub. L. 105–258, title I, §103, Oct. 14, 1998, 112 Stat. 1904. |
| 40301(b) | 46 App.:1703(b). | |
| 40301(c) | 46 App.:1703(c). | |
| 40301(d) | 46 App.:1704(f). | Pub. L. 98–237, §5(e) (last sentence), (f), Mar. 20, 1984, 98 Stat. 70; Pub. L. 104–88, title III, §335(c)(2), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 954; Pub. L. 105–258, title I, §104(a)(2), (b), Oct. 14, 1998, 112 Stat. 1904, 1905. |
| 40301(e) | 46 App.:1704(e) (last sentence). | |

Section
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.119 [Reserved]
### §485i. Rules and regulations

The Secretary is authorized to perform any and all acts and to make such rules and regulations as may be necessary and proper for the purpose of carrying the provisions of this subchapter into full force and effect.

(Aug. 4, 1939, ch. 418, §15, 53 Stat. 1198.)
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2



                     TURBODYNE SETTLES WITH LLOYDS OF LONDON


CARPINTERIA, CA - JANUARY 13, 2000 - Turbodyne Technologies Inc.'s (EASDAQ:TRBD)
CEO Gerhard Delf announced today that Turbodyne has settled its lawsuit against
Lloyds of London.

Turbodyne filed suit against Lloyds on May 3, 1999 in Los Angeles Superior
Court. This 1999 litigation involved Lloyds' denial of coverage under
Turbodyne's directors' and officers' insurance in the Grand Tech Inc. litigation
against Turbodyne and Ed Halimi, a director and former officer. Turbodyne's
complaint was for, among other things, breach of contract.

The terms of settlement provided for a lump sum payment of $1.5 million to
Turbodyne. Turbodyne has received payment of the settlement amount.

Turbodyne Technologies Inc., a California based high technology company,
specializes in the development, manufacture and marketing of performance
enhancement, fuel economy and pollution control products for internal combustion
engines in the global automotive, transportation, construction, marine, mining
and military industries.

Turbodyne Technologies Inc.'s headquarters and plant are located in Carpinteria,
CA; additional offices are located in Syosset, NY; Paris, France; and Frankfurt,
Germany.

Turbodyne's World  Wide  Web address is: www.turbodyne.com

Contacts:

Corporate Communications, Peter Weichselbraun (800) 566-1130
VP Group Finance - Investor Relations, Ken Fitzpatrick (800) 566-1130
European Business Development, Markus Kumbrink +49-69-975-44-665
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONI, Peter E. Jokiel, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K ofSpecialty Underwriters’ Alliance, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. [omitted]  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability offinancial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     Date: June 16, 2006      /s/ Peter E. Jokiel         Peter E. Jokiel    Executive Vice President and    Chief Financial Officer
### §10903. Proceedings on examination of vessel

(a) On application made under section 10902(a) of this title, the judge or justice of the peace shall appoint 3 experienced and skilled marine surveyors to examine the vessel for the defects or insufficiencies complained of. The surveyors have the authority to receive and consider evidence necessary to evaluate the complaint. When the complaint involves provisions of food or water, one of the surveyors shall be a medical officer of the Public Health Service, if available. The surveyors shall make a report in writing, signed by at least 2 of them, stating whether the vessel is fit to proceed to sea or, if not, in what respect it is unfit, making appropriate recommendations about additional seamen, provisions, or stores, or about physical repairs, alterations, or additions necessary to make the vessel fit.

(b) On receiving the report, the judge or justice of the peace shall endorse on the report the judgment of the judge or justice on whether the vessel is fit to proceed on the voyage, and, if not, whether the vessel may proceed to another port at which the deficiencies can be corrected. The master and the crew shall comply with the judgment.

(c) The master shall pay all costs of the survey, report, and judgment. However, if the complaint of the crew appears in the report and judgment to have been without foundation, or if the complaint involved provisions of food or water, without reasonable grounds, the master or owner may deduct the amount of the costs and reasonable damages for the detention of the vessel, as determined by the judge or justice of the peace, from the wages of the complaining seamen.

(d) A master of a vessel violating this section who refuses to pay the costs and wages is liable to the United States Government for a civil penalty of $100 and is liable in damages to each person injured by the refusal.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 575.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 10903(a), (b) | 46:654 |
| 10903(c) | 46:659 |
| 10903(d) | 46:660 |

Section 10903 provides for marine surveyors appointed by a judge or justice of the peace to inspect a vessel on which a complaint of unfitness was made, for a judge or justice of the peace to judge the fitness based on the findings, and for the payment of costs of the inspection by the master or the crew. It also includes a penalty for noncompliance.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Action Industries, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ending December 31, 2008, I, Joseph Meuse, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  April 10, 2009 Action Industries, Inc. By:  /s/ Joseph Meuse Joseph Meuse  Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Action Industries, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ending December 31, 2008, I, Inna Sheveleva, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  April 10, 2009 Action Industries, Inc. By:  /s/ Inna Sheveleva Inna Sheveleva
Editorial Note on Part 982
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999, and at 89 FR 38293, May 7, 2024.

§ 982.317 Lease-purchase agreements. ( a ) A family leasing a unit with assistance under the program may enter into an agreement with an owner to purchase the unit. So long as the family is receiving such rental assistance, all requirements applicable to families otherwise leasing units under the tenant-based program apply. Any homeownership premium (e.g., increment of value attributable to the value of the lease-purchase right or agreement such as an extra monthly payment to accumulate a downpayment or reduce the purchase price) included in the rent to the owner that would result in a higher subsidy amount than would otherwise be paid by the PHA must be absorbed by the family.
( b ) In determining whether the rent to owner for a unit subject to a lease-purchase agreement is a reasonable amount in accordance with § 982.503, any homeownership premium paid by the family to the owner must be excluded when the PHA determines rent reasonableness.
[65 FR 55162, Sept. 12, 2000]