alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3431 

To amend the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to limit casino expansion. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 26, 2005 

Mr. DENT (for himself, Mr. EHLERS, Mr. PITTS, Mr. ROGERS of Michigan, 

Mr. AKIN, Mr. PLATTS, Mr. WOLF, Mr. GERLACH, Mr. SCHWARZ of 

Michigan, and Mr. CANTOR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to limit casino 

expansion. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON INDIAN LAND ELIGIBLE FOR 

4 GAMING. 

5 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This section may be cited as the 

6 ‘‘Limitation of Tribal Gambling to Existing Tribal Lands 

7 Act of 2005’’. 

8 (b) REPEAL OF CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS.—Section 

9 20(b)(1) of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 

10 2719(b)(1)) is amended— 
2 

•HR 3431 IH 

1 (1) by striking subparagraph (B); 

2 (2) in subparagraph (A) by striking ‘‘; or’’ and 

3 inserting a period; and 

4 (3) by striking ‘‘Subsection (a) of this section’’ 

5 and all that follows through ‘‘(A) the Secretary’’ and 

6 inserting ‘‘Subsection (a) of this section will not 

7 apply when the Secretary’’. 

8 (c) APPROVAL OF STATE LEGISLATURE.—Section 

9 20(b)(1)(A) of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 

10 U.S.C. 2719(b)(1)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘only if the 

11 Governor’’ and inserting ‘‘only if the Governor and the leg12 islature’’. 

13 (d) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by this 

14 section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of 

15 this Act. Such amendments shall not apply to lands regu16 lated, on the date of the enactment of this Act, by a valid 

17 Tribal-State compact that was entered into under the In18 dian Gaming Regulatory Act before the date of the enact19 ment of this Act. 

Æ
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  February 27, 2009
    /s/ Matthew J. AssiffMatthew J. AssiffSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund XI, LLC, (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dean L. Cash, President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|Date: March 26, 2008                          
|                                              
|/s/ Dean L. Cash                              
|Dean L. Cash                                  
|President and Chief Executive Officer of      
|ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF IMPSAT CORPORATION AND ITS CONSOLIDATED
SUBSIDIARIES AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         146,078
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,949
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,050
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               214,399
<PP&E>                                         317,219
<DEPRECIATION>                                 211,430
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 599,192
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          133,902
<BONDS>                                        384,113
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          145,389
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       120,951
<OTHER-SE>                                     100,778
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   599,192
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               167,129
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  230,099
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,215
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                14,660
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,976
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (115,161)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,952
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (100,977)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1751 How do I decommission a pipeline in place? You must do the following to decommission a pipeline in place: ( a ) Submit a pipeline decommissioning application in triplicate to the Regional Supervisor for approval. Your application must be accompanied by payment of the service fee listed in § 250.125. Your application must include the following information: ( 1 ) Reason for the operation;
( 2 ) Proposed decommissioning procedures;
( 3 ) Length (feet) of segment to be decommissioned; and
( 4 ) Length (feet) of segment remaining.
( b ) Pig the pipeline, unless the Regional Supervisor determines that pigging is not practical;
( c ) Flush the pipeline;
( d ) Fill the pipeline with seawater;
( e ) Cut and plug each end of the pipeline;
( f ) Bury each end of the pipeline at least 3 feet below the seafloor or cover each end with protective concrete mats, if required by the Regional Supervisor; and
( g ) Remove all pipeline valves and other fittings that could unduly interfere with other uses of the OCS.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Anthony, Appellant.

[833 NYS2d 422]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), imposed May 4, 2004, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. No opinion. Prudenti, EJ., Spolzino, Florio, Covello and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
### §368. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act June 5, 1920, ch. 235, §1, 41 Stat. 908, which related to compensation of clerks in district land offices, was limited to the appropriation act of which it was a part.
§ 203.60 Who may apply for royalty relief on a case-by-case basis in deep water in the Gulf of Mexico or offshore of Alaska? You may apply for royalty relief under §§ 203.61(b) and 203.62 for an individual lease, unit or project if you: ( a ) Hold a pre-Act lease (as defined in § 203.0) that we have assigned to an authorized field (as defined in § 203.0);
( b ) Propose an expansion project (as defined in § 203.0); or
( c ) Propose a development project (as defined in § 203.0).
### **CHAPTER 303—NATIONAL DRIVER REGISTER**

Sec.
30301.
Definitions.
30302.
National Driver Register.
30303.
State participation.
30304.
Reports by chief driver licensing officials.
30305.
Access to Register information.
[30306.
Repealed.]
30307.
Criminal penalties.
30308.
Authorization of appropriations.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2021**—Pub. L. 117–58, div. B, title IV, §24218(b), Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 831, struck out item 30306 "National Driver Register Advisory Committee".
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Annual Report of McNab Creek Gold Corp. (the"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,Peter Townsend, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sect.1350, as adopted pursuant to Sect. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the25th day of May, 2007.

***/s/ Peter Dickie***

Chief Executive Officer

----

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of McNab Creek Gold Corp. (the"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,Christopher Turley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Sect. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sect. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the25th day of May, 2007.

***/s/ Christopher Turley***

Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               8
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,982
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      9,345
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,182
<PP&E>                                         135,477
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,933
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 198,796
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,174
<BONDS>                                        141,461
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           25,090
<PREFERRED>                                     23,000
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (73,922)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   198,796
<SALES>                                         56,952
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,952
<CGS>                                           50,334
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,661
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (590)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,625
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,744)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (200)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,544)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,544)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 985
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 985 appear at 64 FR 67983, Dec. 3, 1999.

§ 985.103 SEMAP score and overall performance rating. ( a ) *High performer rating.* PHAs with SEMAP scores of at least 90 percent shall be rated high performers under SEMAP. PHAs that achieve an overall performance rating of high performer may receive national recognition by the Department and may be given competitive advantage under notices of fund availability.
( b ) *Standard rating.* PHAs with SEMAP scores of 60 to 89 percent shall be rated standard.
( c ) *Troubled rating.* PHAs with SEMAP scores of less than 60 percent shall be rated troubled.
( d ) *Modified rating on an indicator.* A rating on any of the indicators at §§ 985.3(a) through 985.3(h) will be subject to change after HUD receives the PHA's annual audit report or after HUD conducts a confirmatory review if the audit report or the confirmatory review report contains information that the PHA's SEMAP certification concerning an indicator is not accurate.
( e ) *Modified or withheld overall rating.* ( 1 ) Notwithstanding an PHA's SEMAP score, HUD may modify or withhold an PHA's overall performance rating when warranted by circumstances which have bearing on the SEMAP indicators such as an PHA's appeal of its overall rating, adverse litigation, a conciliation agreement under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, fair housing and equal opportunity monitoring and compliance review findings, fraud or misconduct, audit findings or substantial noncompliance with program requirements.
( 2 ) Notwithstanding an PHA's SEMAP score, if the latest IA report submitted for the PHA under the Single Audit Act indicates that the auditor is unable to provide an opinion as to whether the PHA's financial statements are presented fairly in all material respects in conformity with generally accepted accounting principals, or an opinion that the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards is presented fairly in all material respects in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole, the PHA will automatically be given an overall performance rating of troubled and the PHA will be subject to the requirements at § 985.107.
( 3 ) When HUD modifies or withholds a rating for any reason, it shall explain in writing to the PHA the reasons for the modification or for withholding the rating.
[63 FR 48555, Sept. 10, 1998, as amended at 64 FR 40498, July 26, 1999]
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00438-CR

Larry Beltran, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-08-500396, HONORABLE FRED A. MOORE, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on July 22, 2010, and the record was complete

on October 22, 2010, making appellant’s brief due November 22. Appellant has filed five motions

for extension of time to file his brief, and this Court has granted him four extensions, with the most

recent deadline being March 8, 2011. To date, however, and despite filing his fifth motion on

March 7, asking to have the deadline extended only to March 8 and explaining that the brief needed

only to be printed, bound, and filed, the brief has not been filed.

We therefore abate the appeal. The trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine

whether appellant still wishes to pursue his appeal, whether appellant is indigent, and whether

counsel has abandoned the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b). The court shall make appropriate

findings and recommendations, and a supplemental record from this hearing, including copies of all
findings and orders and a transcription of the court reporter’s notes, shall be forwarded to the clerk

of this Court within forty-five days of the date of this opinion. See id. R. 38.8(b)(3).

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose

Abated

Filed: March 16, 2011

Do Not Publish

2
§ 965.404 Order of conversion. Conversions to individually metered utility service shall be accomplished in the following order when a PHA has projects of two or more of the designated categories, unless the PHA has a justifiable reason to do otherwise, which shall be documented in its files. ( a ) In projects for which retail service is provided by the utility supplier and the PHA is paying all the individual utility bills, no benefit/cost analysis is necessary, and residents shall be billed directly after the PHA adopts revised payment schedules providing appropriate allowances for resident-supplied utilities.
( b ) In projects for which checkmeters have been installed but are not being utilized as the basis for determining utility charges to the residents, no benefit/cost analysis is necessary. The checkmeters shall be used as the basis for utility charges, and residents shall be surcharged for excess utility use.
( c ) Projects for which meter loops have been installed for utilization of checkmeters shall be analyzed both for the installation of checkmeters and for conversion to retail service.
( d ) Low- or medium-rise family units with a mastermeter system should be analyzed for both checkmetering and conversion to retail service, because of their large potential for energy savings.
( e ) Low- or medium-rise housing for the elderly should next be analyzed for both checkmetering and conversion to retail service, since the potential for energy saving is less than for family units.
( f ) Electric service under mastermeters for high-rise buildings, including projects for the elderly, should be analyzed for both use of retail service and of checkmeters.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] Order Sealing Documents Submitted For In Camera Review - Case No. C 09-0671 CRB

Horace W. Green (SBN 115699)

C. Mark Humbert (SBN 111093)

GREEN & HUMBERT

220 Montgomery Street, Suite 1418

San Francisco, California 94104

Telephone: (415) 837-5433

Facsimile: (415) 837-0127 

Attorneys for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEPHEN ARNOLD,

Plaintiff,

vs.

UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF 

AMERICA, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C 09-0671 CRB

[proposed] ORDER SEALING 

DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR IN 

CAMERA REVIEW BY THE COURT

Case3:09-cv-00671-CRB Document42-2 Filed03/02/10 Page1 of 2 Case 3:09-cv-00671-CRB Document 44 Filed 03/09/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] Order Sealing Documents Submitted for In Camera Review - Case No. C 09-0671 CRB 2

Having reviewed Defendants’ Motion to File Documents under Seal, and good 

cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that the documents submitted remain sealed until such time as the Court completes 

its in camera inspection. Upon completion of the Court’s review, and filing of the Court’s 

ruling on the privilege issues, the documents shall be returned to counsel for Defendants 

and shall not remain in the Court’s files.

Dated: ___________________________

Elizabeth D. Laporte

United States Magistrate Judge

Case3:09-cv-00671-CRB Document42-2 Filed03/02/10 Page2 of 2

March 9, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-00671-CRB Document 44 Filed 03/09/10 Page 2 of 2
§ 18.27 Gaskets. A gasket(s) shall not be used between any two surfaces forming a flame-arresting path except as follows: ( a ) A gasket of lead, elastomer, or equivalent will be acceptable provided the gasket does not interfere with an acceptable metal-to-metal joint.
( b ) A lead gasket(s) or equivalent will be acceptable between glass and a hard metal to form all or a part of a flame-arresting path.
“(d) Death or Disability. Upon the occurrence of your Death or Disability when theTrigger Event Price is $46.00 or more, all of the Designated Shares will vestimmediately. Upon the occurrence of your Death or Disability when the Trigger EventPrice is equal to or greater than $38.00 but less than $46.00, a number ofDesignated Shares equal to the greater of (i) the Trigger Event Shares or (ii) theunvested Initial Threshold Shares if a 40% Qualification Event has previouslyoccurred plus the unvested Second Threshold Shares if a 100% Qualification Event haspreviously occurred, will vest immediately, and the remaining Designated Sharesshall be forfeited immediately. Upon the occurrence of your Death or Disabilitywhen the Trigger Event Price is less than $38.00, if a 40% Qualification Event haspreviously occurred but a 100% Qualification Event has not previously occurred, theunvested Initial Threshold Shares will vest immediately, and the remainingDesignated Shares shall be forfeited immediately. Upon the occurrence of your Deathor Disability when the Trigger Event Price is less than $38.00, if both a 40%Qualification Event and a 100% Qualification Event have previously occurred, allunvested Designated Shares will vest immediately. Upon the occurrence of your Deathor Disability when the Trigger Event Price is less than $38.00, if a 40%Qualification Event has not previously occurred, all Designated Shares shall beforfeited immediately.”     2. Governing Law. THIS AMENDMENT WILL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITHTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, WITHOUT REFERENCE TO PRINCIPLES OF CONFLICT OF LAWS.     3. Entire Agreement. Subject to the terms of the Plan, each Grant Agreement and thisAmendment contain the entire agreement with respect to the award of restricted stock and othermatters evidenced herein and therein.     The Company has executed this Amendment to be effective for all purposes as of the EffectiveDate.      MARINER ENERGY, INC.
Editorial Note on Part 982
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999, and at 89 FR 38293, May 7, 2024.

§ 982.313 Security deposit: Amounts owed by tenant. ( a ) The owner may collect a security deposit from the tenant.
( b ) The PHA may prohibit security deposits in excess of private market practice, or in excess of amounts charged by the owner to unassisted tenants.
( c ) When the tenant moves out of the dwelling unit, the owner, subject to State or local law, may use the security deposit, including any interest on the deposit, in accordance with the lease, as reimbursement for any unpaid rent payable by the tenant, damages to the unit or for other amounts the tenant owes under the lease.
( d ) The owner must give the tenant a written list of all items charged against the security deposit, and the amount of each item. After deducting the amount, if any, used to reimburse the owner, the owner must refund promptly the full amount of the unused balance to the tenant.
( e ) If the security deposit is not sufficient to cover amounts the tenant owes under the lease, the owner may seek to collect the balance from the tenant.