alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.193 Reports and investigations of possible violations. ( a ) Any person may report to BSEE any hazardous or unsafe working condition on any facility engaged in OCS activities, and any possible violation or failure to comply with: ( 1 ) Any provision of the Act,
( 2 ) Any provision of a lease, approved plan, or permit issued under the Act,
( 3 ) Any provision of any regulation or order issued under the Act, or
( 4 ) Any other Federal law relating to safety of offshore oil and gas operations.
( b ) To make a report under this section, a person is not required to know whether any legal requirement listed in paragraph (a) of this section has been violated.
( c ) When BSEE receives a report of a possible violation, or when a BSEE employee detects a possible violation, BSEE will investigate according to BSEE procedures and notify any other Federal agency(ies) for further investigation, as appropriate.
( d ) BSEE investigations of possible violations may include: ( 1 ) Conducting interviews of personnel;
( 2 ) Requiring the prompt production of documents, data, and other evidence;
( 3 ) Requiring the preservation of all relevant evidence and access for BSEE investigators to such evidence; and
( 4 ) Taking other actions and imposing other requirements as necessary to investigate possible violations and assure an orderly investigation.
( e ) ( 1 ) Reports should contain sufficient credible information to establish a reasonable basis for BSEE to investigate whether a violation or other hazardous or unsafe working condition exists.
( 2 ) To report hazardous or unsafe working conditions or a possible violation: ( i ) Contact BSEE by: ( A ) Phone at 1-877-440-0173 (BSEE Toll-free Safety Hotline),
( B ) Internet at *www.bsee.gov ,* or
( C ) Mail to: U.S. DOI/BSEE, 1849 C Street NW., Mail Stop 5438, Washington, DC 20240 Attention: IRU Hotline Operations.
( ii ) Include the following items in the report: ( A ) Name, address, and telephone number should be provided if you do not want to remain anonymous;
( B ) The specific concern, provision or Federal law, if known, referenced in (a) that a person violated or with which a person failed to comply; and
( C ) Any other facts, data, and applicable information.
( f ) When a possible violation is reported, BSEE will protect a person's identity to the extent authorized by law.
[78 FR 20439, Apr. 5, 2013, as amended at 81 FR 36149, June 6, 2016]
Exhibit 32.2
**CERTIFICATION**
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), Bruce D.Horn, Chief Financial Officer of Oplink Communications, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifiesthat, to the best of his knowledge:
**1.**The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and
**2.**The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition at the end of the period covered by the Quarterly Report and results ofoperations of the Company for the periods covered by the Quarterly Report.
**In Witness Whereof,**the undersigned has set his hands hereto as of the 13th day of May, 2005.   /s/ Bruce D. Horn  Bruce D. Horn  Chief Financial Officer  
This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SECand is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Actof 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### § 1210.207 How will information submissions be kept confidential?

Information submitted under this part that constitutes trade secrets or commercial and financial information that is identified as privileged or confidential, or that is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, shall not be available for public inspection or made public or disclosed without the consent of the lessee, except as otherwise provided by law or regulation.

[66 FR 45771, Aug. 30, 2001. Redesignated at 73 FR 15897, Mar. 26, 2008]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.4



February 13, 2006

Grant Thornton LLP
American Center Building, Suite 800
27777 Franklin Road
Southfield, MI 48034

Dear Sir or Madam:

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2005, Origen Financial, Inc. and
subsidiaries ("the Company") has complied in all material respects with the
minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of
America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for
this same period, the Company had in effect a fidelity bond for the amount of
$3,000,000 and errors and omissions policy in the amount of $10,000,000.

Very truly yours,

Origen Financial, Inc.


/s/ Ronald A. Klein
-------------------------------------
Ronald A. Klein,
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ W. Anderson Geater Jr.
-------------------------------------
W. Anderson Geater Jr.,
Chief Financial Officer


/s/ David C. Daugherty
-------------------------------------
David C. Daugherty,
Controller


/s/ Douglas Burdett
-------------------------------------
Douglas Burdett,
EVP - Servicing
### §354a. Technical requirements of equipment on radiotelephone equipped ships

Cargo ships of three hundred gross tons and upward but less than one thousand six hundred gross tons may, in lieu of the radiotelegraph station prescribed by section 354 of this title, be equipped with a radiotelephone station complying with the following requirements:

(a) The radiotelephone station shall be in the upper part of the ship, so located that it is sheltered to the greatest possible extent from noise which might impair the correct reception of messages and signals, and, unless such station is situated on the bridge, there shall be efficient communication with the bridge.

(b) The radiotelephone installation shall be capable of transmitting and receiving on the frequencies, and using the classes of emission, designated by the Commission pursuant to law for the purposes of distress and safety of navigation.

(c) The radiotelephone installation shall have a minimum normal range of one hundred and fifty nautical miles; that is, it shall be capable of transmitting and receiving clearly perceptible signals from ship to ship by day and under normal conditions and circumstances over this range.

(d) There shall be available at all times a main source of electrical energy sufficient to operate the installation over the normal range required by subsection (c) of this section. If batteries are provided they shall have sufficient capacity to operate the transmitter and receiver for at least six continuous hours under normal working conditions. In installations made on or after November 19, 1952, a reserve source of electrical energy shall be provided in the upper part of the ship unless the main source of energy is so situated.

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title III, §356, as added Aug. 13, 1954, ch. 729, §2(d), 68 Stat. 706; amended Pub. L. 89–121, §7, Aug. 13, 1965, 79 Stat. 515.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1965—Pub. L. 89–121 limited the opening provisions to cargo ships of 300 gross tons and upwards.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 89–121 required the radiotelephone station to be so located that it is sheltered to the greatest possible extent from noise which might impair the correct reception of messages and signals.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 89–121 substituted "on the frequencies, and using the classes of emission, designated" for "on the frequencies and with types of emissions designated".

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 89–121 substituted "radiotelephone installation" for "transmitter" and inserted provisions requiring the installation to be capable of receiving clearly perceptible signals over the minimum normal range.

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 89–121 substituted "a main source of electrical energy" for "a source of energy", "at least six continuous hours" for "at least six hours continuously", and "installations made on or after November 19, 1952, a reserve source of electrical energy" for "in installations an emergency source of energy".
### §1396. Duties and taxes covered into Virgin Islands treasury

The duties and taxes collected in pursuance of sections 1394 and 1395 of this title shall not be covered into the general fund of the Treasury of the United States, but shall be used and expended for the government and benefit of the Virgin Islands, under such rules and regulations as the President may prescribe.

(Mar. 3, 1917, ch. 171, §5, 39 Stat. 1133.)
In The Matter Of: 

### SERVED: December 2, 2016 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF



## TRANSPORT **HENJTPJ N**  OFFICE OF HEARINGS



## TR~ SPORTM' WASHINGTON, DC 

## lO\b 

## OEC -S 

## p \: 26 

## DOCKET OPERA 1\0NS

. Docket No. FAA-2015-0643 Mach One Air Charters, Inc. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2014
. WP210018 Respondent

'I ! 

### ORDER FINALIZING LITIGATION SCHEDULE On August 23, 2016, the undersignedjudge held a prehearing conference in the above captioned case. During the course ofthe conference, the parties developed ajoint litigation schedule with a timeline dependent upon the hearing date. On August 24, 2016, the undersignedjudge issued a Prehearing Conference Report, ordering the parties to adhere to thejoint litigation schedule. On December 2, 2016, the undersignedjudge issued a Notice ofHearing, setting the hearing in this case to begin on March 21, 201 7. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §§ 13.205(a)(6) and 13.217(d), 

### IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Complete witness and evidence lists shall be exchanged by the parties and submitted to the undersignedjudge no later than 

### February 17, 2017. 2. Any subpoenarequests shall be submitted to the undersignedjudge no later than 

### February 17, 2017. 3. Each party shall provide the undersignedjudge a CD containing digital copies of premarked versions ofall proposed exhibits no later than 

### February 17, 2017.

Administrative Law Judge
Attachment: Service List

### SERVICE LIST

- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1



### Steven L. Graff, Respondent's Counsel 

### Steven L. Graff, Inc. 43399 Calle De Velardo Temecula, CA 92592 TEL: 951-303-6400 FAX: 951-303-0723 Lisa Toscano, Complainant's Counsel 

### Enforcement Division, Western Team Federal Aviation Administration P. 

### 0. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-7110 FAX: 310-725-6816 ONE COPY

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald,Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2015-0643 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

      I, Harold F. Zagunis, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Sequoia
Residential Funding, Inc., a Delaware corporation, hereby certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of the
Certificates for periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these
reports;

      4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included
in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance with the
terms of the pooling and servicing agreement, and except as disclosed in the
reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
agreement; and

      5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing agreement, that is included
in these reports.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Morgan Stanley
Dean Witter Credit Corporation, as Servicer, GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.,
as Servicer, Cendant Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer, Bank of America, N.A.,
as Servicer, GMAC Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer, and Countrywide Home Loans,
Inc., as Servicer.

Date: March 31, 2005

/s/ Harold F. Zagunis
--------------------------
Signature
Name: Harold F. Zagunis
Title: Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

KENNETH JAMES NEILSON,

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 08-2059 (JDB)

UNITED STATES, et al.,

 Defendants.

ORDER

Upon consideration of [#2] defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint, and the entire

record herein, and for the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion issued on this date, it is

hereby

ORDERED that defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED.

 /s/ 

 JOHN D. BATES

 United States District Judge

Dated: December 17, 2009
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tumbleweed Communications Corp. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Timothy G. Conley, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
August 8, 2006



|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ TIMOTHY G. CONLEY                                                         
|Timothy G. Conley Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsIntegrated Turbine Tip Clearance and Gas Turbine Engine SimulationGas turbine compressor and turbine blade tip clearance (i.e., the radial distance between the blade tip of an axial compressor or turbine and the containment structure) is a major contributing factor to gas path sealing, and can significantly affect engine efficiency and operational temperature. This paper details the creation of a generic but realistic high pressure turbine tip clearance model that may be used to facilitate active tip clearance control system research. This model uses a first principles approach to approximate thermal and mechanical deformations of the turbine system, taking into account the rotor, shroud, and blade tip components. Validation of the tip clearance model shows that the results are realistic and reflect values found in literature. In addition, this model has been integrated with a gas turbine engine simulation, creating a platform to explore engine performance as tip clearance is adjusted. Results from the integrated model explore the effects of tip clearance on engine operation and highlight advantages of tip clearance management.Document ID20160012685Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsChapman, Jeffryes W.*(Vantage Partners, LLC Brook Park, OH, United States)*Kratz, Jonathan*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Guo, Ten-Huei*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Litt, Jonathan*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredOctober 27, 2016Publication DateOctober 1, 2016Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberE-19269NASA/TM-2016-219146GRC-E-DAA-TN34472Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 081876.02.03.50.04.02CONTRACT_GRANT: NNC12BA01BDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Keywordsaerothermodynamicsgas path dynamicssystem modelingAvailable DownloadsNameType20160012685.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle20170000885See AlsoIntegrated Turbine Tip Clearance and Gas Turbine Engine Simulationvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Johh H. Austin, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County rendered upon a verdict convicting him of the first and second counts of a fouiveount indictment charging the crimes of criminally receiving stolen property -and criminally concealing and withholding stolen property. (Penal Law, § 1308.) The evidence clearly established the guilt of defendant and the proof abundantly sustains the convictions. We find no merit in the assignments of error in respect to the admission of evidence offered by the People. Nor can we say that the sentence imposed by the trial court was excessive. There is no showing tho-t any juror participating in the trial had read the newspaper account the publication of which is claimed to have interfered with defendant’s right to -a fair trial. Upon this record the trial court *675did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant a mistrial. - *(People*v. *Lubin,*190 App. Div. 339, affd. 229 N. Y. 601; *People*v. *Genovese,*10 N Y 2d 478.) Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
### **CHAPTER 407—CONTROLLED CARRIERS**

Sec.
40701.
Rates.
40702.
Rate standards.
40703.
Effective date of rates.
40704.
Commission review.
40705.
Presidential review of Commission orders.
40706.
Exceptions.
#### James McCullagh Co., Inc., Respondent, v South Huntington Union Free School District, Appellant.

[833 NYS2d 214]

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), dated May 23, 2006, which denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the complaint for failure to comply with Education Law § 3813 (1) and (2-b).

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the complaint for failure to comply with Education Law § 3813 (1) and (2-b) is granted.

*481Pursuant to Education Law § 3813, no action may be maintained against a school district unless a notice of claim was served within three months of the date on which the claim accrued *(see*Education Law § 3813 [1]; *C.S.A. Contr. Corp. v New York City School Constr. Auth.,*5 NY3d 189, 192 [2005]; *Parochial Bus Sys. v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y.,*60 NY2d 539, 547 [1983]). In actions “for monies due . . . [on a] contract, accrual of such claim shall be deemed to have occurred as of the date payment for the amount claimed was denied” (Education Law § 3813 [1]). Moreover, Education Law § 3813 (2-b) provides that no action against a school district shall be commenced more than one year after the cause of action arose. A breach of contract can be said to occur when the party seeking payment should have viewed his claim as having been constructively rejected *(see*Education Law § 3813 [1]; *see Matter of Hawthorne Cedar Knolls Union Free School Dist. v Carey & Walsh, Inc.,*36 AD3d 810 [2007]; *Dodge, Chamberlin, Luzine, Weber Architects v Dutchess County Bd. of Coop. Educ. Servs.,*258 AD2d 434, 435 [1999]; *Alfred Santini & Co. v City of New York,*266 AD2d 119, 120 [1999]).

Here, the defendant established that the plaintiffs request for payment had been constructively rejected no later than February 2004, and thus, the cause of action accrued more than three months prior to service of the notice of claim in July 2004 and more than one year before commencement of the action in May 2005 *(see Capstone Enters, of Port Chester, Inc. v Valhalla Union Free School Dist.,*27 AD3d 411, 412 [2006]).

Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the defendant was not estopped from asserting its defense pursuant to Education Law § 3813 *(see Bronco Bus Corp. v City of Yonkers Bd. of Educ.,*250 AD2d 718, 719 [1998]).

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.4





	



Demand Promissory Note, dated May 4, 2022, in the principal amount of $50,000 from Bookmakers Company US, LLC payable to Victor Salerno


 


Please refer to the accompanying Exhibit 10.4. It is saved in PDF format.