alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3567 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3567

 To provide for certain tunnel life safety and rehabilitation projects 
                              for Amtrak.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 28, 2005

  Mr. King of New York (for himself and Mr. Pascrell) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for certain tunnel life safety and rehabilitation projects 
                              for Amtrak.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Northeast Corridor Rail Tunnel 
Safety Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of 
Transportation $898,000,000, to remain available until expended, for 
the use of Amtrak to complete New York tunnel life safety projects and 
to rehabilitate tunnels in Washington, DC and Baltimore, Maryland.

SEC. 3. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.

    The Secretary shall not make funds appropriated under section 2 
available to Amtrak for a project unless the Secretary has received 
from Amtrak and has approved an engineering and financial plan for that 
project.

SEC. 4. INSPECTOR GENERAL REVIEW.

    The Inspector General of the Department of Transportation shall 
conduct and transmit to the Congress an annual review to determine 
whether the expenditure and obligation of funds made available under 
this Act are consistent with the purposes for which those funds are 
made available.
                                 <all>
```
§ 880.506 Default by owner (private-owner/HUD and PHA-owner/HUD projects). The Contract will provide: ( a ) That if HUD determines that the owner is in default under the Contract, HUD will notify the owner and the lender of the actions required to be taken to cure the default and of the remedies to be applied by HUD including specific performance under the Contract, reduction or suspension of housing assistance payments and recovery of overpayments, where appropriate; and
( b ) That if the owner fails to cure the default, HUD has the right to terminate the Contract or to take other corrective action.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCharacterization of cavity flow fields using pressure data obtained in the Langley 0.3-Meter Transonic Cryogenic TunnelStatic and fluctuating pressure distributions were obtained along the floor of a rectangular-box cavity in an experiment performed in the LaRC 0.3-Meter Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel. The cavity studied was 11.25 in. long and 2.50 in. wide with a variable height to obtain length-to-height ratios of 4.4, 6.7, 12.67, and 20.0. The data presented herein were obtained for yaw angles of 0 deg and 15 deg over a Mach number range from 0.2 to 0.9 at a Reynolds number of 30 x 10(exp 6) per ft with a boundary-layer thickness of approximately 0.5 in. The results indicated that open and transitional-open cavity flow supports tone generation at subsonic and transonic speeds at Mach numbers of 0.6 and above. Further, pressure fluctuations associated with acoustic tone generation can be sustained when static pressure distributions indicate that transitional-closed and closed flow fields exist in the cavity. Cavities that support tone generation at 0 deg yaw also supported tone generation at 15 deg yaw when the flow became transitional-closed. For the latter cases, a reduction in tone amplitude was observed. Both static and fluctuating pressure data must be considered when defining cavity flow fields, and the flow models need to be refined to accommodate steady and unsteady flows.Document ID19930013687Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsTracy, M. B.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Plentovich, E. B.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1993Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-4436NAS 1.15:4436L-17158Accession Number93N22876Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-68-70-08Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930013687.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §361. Control by Commission; review of decisions

Nothing in this subchapter shall be interpreted as lessening in any degree the control of the Commission over all matters connected with the radio equipment and its operation on shipboard and its decision and determination in regard to the radio requirements, installations, or exemptions from prescribed radio requirements shall be final, subject only to review in accordance with law.

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title III, §363, formerly §361, as added May 20, 1937, ch. 229, §10(b), 50 Stat. 196; renumbered §363, Aug. 13, 1954, ch. 729, §2(a)(1), 68 Stat. 706.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective May 20, 1937, see section 16 of act May 20, 1937, set out as a note under section 351 of this title.
§ 1218.302 Late payment or underpayment charges. ( a ) The failure to make timely or proper payment of any monies due pursuant to leases and contracts subject to these regulations will result in the collection by the ONRR of the full amount past due plus a late payment charge. Exceptions to this late payment charge may be granted when estimated payments on minerals production have already been made timely and otherwise in accordance with the instructions provided by the ONRR to the payor.
( b ) Late payment charges will be assessed on any late payment or underpayment from the date that the payment was due until the date that the payment was received at the ONRR addresses specified in § 1218.51. Payments received at the specified ONRR addresses after 4 p.m. Mountain Time are considered received the following business day.
( c ) Late payment charges are calculated on the basis of a percentage assessment rate. In the absence of a specific lease, permit, license or contract provision prescribing a different rate, this percentage assessment rate is prescribed by the Department of the Treasury as the “Treasury Current Value of Funds Rate.”
( d ) This rate is available in the Treasury Fiscal Requirements Manual Bulletins that are published prior to the first day of each calendar quarter for application to overdue payments or underpayments in the new calendar quarter. The rate is also published in the Notices section of the Federal Register and indexed under “Fiscal Service/Notices/Funds Rate; Treasury Current Value.”
( e ) Late payment charges apply to all underpayments and payments received after the date due. These charges include production, minimum, and compensatory royalties; assessments for liquidated damages; administrative fees and payments by purchasers of royalty taken-in-kind; or any other payments, fees, or assessments that a lessee/operator/payor/royalty taken-in-kind purchaser is required to pay by a specified date. The failure to pay past due payments, including late payment charges, will result in the initiation of other enforcement proceedings.
( f ) An overpayment on a lease or leases may be offset against an underpayment on a different lease or leases to determine a net underpayment on which interest is due pursuant to conditions specified in § 1218.42.
[47 FR 22528, May 25, 1982. Redesignated at 48 FR 35641, Aug. 5, 1983, and further redesignated at 51 FR 15767, Apr. 28, 1986 and 52 FR 23815, June 25, 1987, as amended at 57 FR 41868, Sept. 14, 1992; 57 FR 62207, Dec. 30, 1992; 59 FR 14559, Mar. 29, 1994; 65 FR 55189, Sept. 13, 2000; 67 FR 19112, Apr. 18, 2002]
From: Alan Carpien/DC/USEPA/US To: Marc Thomas/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 06/21/2012 02:03 PM Subject: Late Usolicited Comment on NHSM

The attachment, below, is an unsolicited comment s ubmitted by a commentor on the NHSM rule. This document was submitted subsequent to the April 16, 2012, meeting that I have described in a previous email.

This document is a draft of preamble language that the commentor would prefer to see based on public comments previously submitted or other ideas not pr esented in the rulemaking record, previously. We have considered public comments, as appropriate, fo r all the topics presented in this document.

----- Forwarded by Alan Carpien/DC/USEPA/US on 06/20/2012 04:40 PM -----

From: John Michaud/DC/USEPA/US To: Alan Carpien/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 05/08/2012 10:07 AM Subject: Fw: NHSM

Please see below.

Thanks.

John R. Michaud Deputy Associate General Counsel Solid Waste and Emergency Response Law Office Office of General Counsel U.S. EPA, Washington, D.C. Mail Code: 2366A tel: 202-564-5518 fax: 202-564-5531 email: michaud.john@epa.gov ----- Forwarded by John Michaud/DC/USEPA/US on 05/08/2012 10:06 AM -----

From: Avi Garbow/DC/USEPA/US To: John Michaud/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Lisa Feldt/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 05/07/2012 05:45 PM Subject: Fw: NHSM

Lisa and John,

Susan Bodine emailed me some language she suggest s may be appropriate for the preamble discussion pertaining to burden of proof. Please revi ew and circulate as appropriate. Thanks,

Avi

Avi Garbow Deputy General Counsel U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (202) 564-1917 ----- Forwarded by Avi Garbow/DC/USEPA/US on 05/07/2012 05:43 PM -----From: "Bodine, Susan" <Susan.Bodine@btlaw.com> To: Avi Garbow/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 05/07/2012 05:41 PM Subject: NHSM

As discussed.

Please call if you have any questions.

Susan Bodine

Susan Parker Bodine Partner susan.bodine@BTLaw.com

Barnes & Thornburg LLP 1717 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W. Suite 500 Washington, DC 20006

Phone: 202-371-6364 Fax: 202-289-1330 www.btlaw.com



### CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance upon this message. If you have received this in error, please notify us immediately by return email and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message. TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a

### partner.

Proposed NHSM Preamble Language.pdf
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Louis Rich, *821Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered May 12, 1976, convicting defendant of two counts of bribery in the second degree and one count of obstructing governmental administration, unanimously reversed, on the law, and this case remanded for a new trial. The defendant was indicted upon two counts of bribery in the second degree and one count of obstructing governmental administration. In essence, the defendant was charged with offering a bribe to police officers for the purpose of preventing those officers from returning a weapon, seized in Queens County, to a New. York County Supreme Court Justice who had issued the search warrant. After deliberating approximately 75 minutes, the jury returned to the courtroom with the following questions: "The indictment states that the intent of the bribe was to prevent police officers from taking the gun to the Judge. If there is doubt that that was the intent of the bribe, what does this mean in terms of the obstruction of justice portions of the indictment? And does this constitute reasonable doubt? The second part of the question reads: If there is doubt as to the intent of the bribe — i.e., to take the gun to the Judge, does this raise a reasonable doubt as to the guilt of the defendant under this indictment? Is it proper to speculate as to the defendant’s state of mind? i.e. what was he thinking at the time?” In response to the jury’s questions, the trial court gave a rambling supplemental charge. The court, in the course of that supplemental charge, specifically answered only one of the jury’s questions in the following statement: "With respect to the question 'is it proper to speculate as to the defendant’s state of mind’, I told you that with respect to intent you are not to speculate.” Defense counsel properly excepted to the entire supplemental charge on the ground that the lower court had grossly failed to reply to the jury’s individual queries. Moreover, the court’s supplemental instruction on the definition and significance of the word "intent” was, at best, confusing and, at worst, unintelligible: "Unless the act is done under circumstances that show that no such result is intended or is contemplated or could be known to the person doing them, you have a right to find that the result that was produced was intended if it was known to the person who was acting and he had knowledge of all the implications of the conduct that was involved.” In light of the trial court’s failure to answer the jury’s questions directly and its incomprehensible charge on the meaning of "intent”, the judgment is reversed and a new trial is ordered. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 7, 2011 

s0131 

Order 

 

February 7, 2011 

141860 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141860 

 COA: 288799 

 Oakland CC: 2008-221657-FH 

JUSTIN MARK GRIESEMER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 12, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
### UNITED STATES NAVY

- MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

J.A. FISCHER, K.M. MCDONALD, D.J. SMITH

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

SHAWN M. BACKOWSKI

SERGEANT (E

- 5), U.S. MARINE CORPS

NMCCA 20140 0319

SPECIAL COURT

- MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 7 July 2014

. Military Judge: Maj N.A. Martz, USMC

. Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, 2d Battalion, 10th

Marine Regiment, 2d Marine Division, Camp Lejuene, NC

. Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: LtCol K.S. Woodard,

USMC

. For Appellant: LCDR John Zelinka, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian Keller , Esq

.

1 8 December 2014

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT

------------------------------------------------- --

After careful consideration of the record, submitted

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
#### McDOUGAL & POTTER CO., Respondent, v. DE HART et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 6, 1903.)

Action by the McDougal & Potter Company against John De Hart and others.

G. Hahn, for appellants.

W. D. Neilley, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

VAN BRUNT, P. J., dissents.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3434 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3434

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to establish a presumption of 
service-connection for certain veterans with Hepatitis C, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 2005

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to establish a presumption of 
service-connection for certain veterans with Hepatitis C, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRESUMPTION OF SERVICE-CONNECTION FOR CERTAIN VETERANS WITH 
              HEPATITIS C.

    (a) Presumption.--Section 1112 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d)(1) For the purposes of section 1110 of this title, and 
subject to the provisions of section 1113 of this title, the disease 
Hepatitis C becoming manifest to a degree of 10 percent or more in any 
veteran described in paragraph (2) after active military, naval, or air 
service covered by that paragraph shall be considered to have been 
incurred in or aggravated by such service, notwithstanding that there 
is no record of evidence of that disease during such service.
    ``(2) Paragraph (1) applies in the case of the following:
            ``(A) Veterans who received during a period of service 
        before December 31, 1992, a transfusion of blood or blood 
        products.
            ``(B) Veterans who were exposed to blood on or through the 
        skin or a mucous membrane during a period of service.
            ``(C) Veterans who underwent hemodyalisis during a period 
        of service.
            ``(D) Veterans who experienced a needle-stick accident or 
        medical event involving a needle, not due to the veteran's own 
        willful misconduct, during a period of service.
            ``(E) Veterans diagnosed with unexplained liver disease 
        during a period of service.
            ``(F) Veterans who experienced an unexplained liver 
        dysfunction value or test during a period of service.
            ``(G) Veterans who served in a health-care position or 
        specialty during a period of service under such circumstances 
        as the Secretary shall prescribe for purposes of this 
        subsection.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act. No benefit may be 
paid or provided by reason of that amendment for any period before such 
date.
                                 <all>
```
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3527

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Ethalfluralin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2005

Mr. BUYER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Ethalfluralin.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ETHALFLURALIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.30.49 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 N-Ethyl-N-(2-methyl-2-propenyl)-2,6-dinitro-4-

7 (trifluoromethyl)benzenamine) is amended by striking 

8 ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2

•HR 3527 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)

**Title:**  Annual report on the economic impact ofthe federal historic tax credit

2010,2011,2012

 
SuDoc:�� I 29.1/9-3:����������� 
�Item Number: 0653-A-11 (online)
CGP system Number: 001007588