alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§1010 to 1019. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 1010 to 1019 were omitted in view of recognition of Philippine independence.

Section 1010, acts Aug. 29, 1916, ch. 416, §11, 39 Stat. 548; July 21, 1921, ch. 51, 42 Stat. 145; May 31, 1922, ch. 203, 42 Stat. 599, related to prohibition against export duties and imposition of taxes and assessments.

Section 1011, acts July 1, 1902, ch. 1369, §84, 32 Stat. 711; July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title VII, §711, 58 Stat. 714; Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 958, §5, 60 Stat. 1049, related to shipping, customs, duties, seamen, and health laws.

Section 1011a, act July 3, 1930, ch. 831, 46 Stat. 851, related to imports consigned to departments and bureaus of United States Government.

Section 1012, act Feb. 6, 1905, ch. 453, §5, 33 Stat. 692, related to admission free of duty of railroad material.

Section 1013, act Feb. 6, 1905, ch. 453, §6, 33 Stat. 692, related to administration of immigration laws.

Section 1014, act Apr. 29, 1908, ch. 152, §5, 35 Stat. 70, related to administration of navigation laws.

Section 1015, act Apr. 29, 1908, ch. 152, §1, 35 Stat. 70, related to temporary regulation of transportation of merchandise and passengers.

Section 1016, acts Apr. 29, 1908, ch. 152, §4, 35 Stat. 70; Aug. 29, 1916, ch. 416, §22, 39 Stat. 553, related to licenses to certain vessels.

Section 1017, act Apr. 29, 1908, ch. 152, §3, 35 Stat. 70, related to inapplicability to certain foreign vessels of restrictions on transportation of merchandise and passengers.

Section 1018, act July 1, 1902, ch. 1369, §11, 32 Stat. 695, related to improvement of harbors and navigable waters.

Section 1019, acts Mar. 22, 1902, ch. 273, 32 Stat. 88; Mar. 2, 1917, ch. 145, §54, 39 Stat. 968, related to acknowledgment of deeds.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph Grazi, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Noonan, JJ.
§ 27.23 Automatic warning device. ( a ) An automatic warning device shall be suitably constructed for incorporation in or with permissible and approved equipment that is operated in gassy mines and tunnels.
( b ) An automatic warning device shall include an alarm signal (audible or colored light), which shall be made to function automatically at a methane content of the mine atmosphere between 1.0 to 1.5 volume percent and at all higher concentrations of methane.
( c ) It is recommended that the automatic warning device be supplemented by a meter calibrated in volume percent of methane.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3549 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3549

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 210 West 3rd Avenue in Warren, Pennsylvania, as the ``William F. 
                  Clinger, Jr. Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 28, 2005

Mr. English of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. Peterson of Pennsylvania, 
  Ms. Hart, Mr. Fattah, Mr. Sherwood, Mr. Weldon of Pennsylvania, Mr. 
 Pitts, Mr. Doyle, Mr. Gerlach, Mr. Dent, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Shuster, Ms. 
Schwartz of Pennsylvania, Mr. Murtha, Mr. Platts, Mr. Holden, Mr. Brady 
 of Pennsylvania, Mr. Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, and Mr. Kanjorski) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 210 West 3rd Avenue in Warren, Pennsylvania, as the ``William F. 
                  Clinger, Jr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WILLIAM F. CLINGER, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 210 West 3rd Avenue in Warren, Pennsylvania, shall be known 
and designated as the ``William F. Clinger, Jr. Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``William F. 
Clinger, Jr. Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 203.44 What administrative steps must I take to use the royalty suspension volume? ( a ) You must notify the BSEE Regional Supervisor for Production and Development in writing of your intent to begin drilling operations on all deep wells and phase 1 ultra-deep wells; and
( b ) Within 30 days of the beginning of production from all wells that would become qualified wells by satisfying the requirements of this section, you must: ( 1 ) Provide written notification to the BSEE Regional Supervisor for Production and Development that production has begun; and
( 2 ) Request confirmation of the size of the royalty suspension volume earned by your lease.
( c ) Before beginning production, you must meet any production measurement requirements that the BSEE Regional Supervisor for Production and Development has determined are necessary under 30 CFR part 250, subpart L.
( d ) You must provide the information in paragraph (b) of this section by January 20, 2009, if you produced before December 18, 2008, from a qualified deep well or qualified phase 1 ultra-deep well on a lease that is located entirely in water more than 200 meters and less than 400 meters deep.
( e ) The BSEE Regional Supervisor for Production and Development may extend the deadline for beginning production for up to one year for a well that cannot begin production before the applicable date prescribed in the definition of “qualified deep well” in § 203.0 if it meets all of the following criteria. ( 1 ) The well otherwise meets the criteria in the definition of a qualified deep well in § 203.0.
( 2 ) The delay in production occurred after reaching total depth in the well.
( 3 ) Production (other than test production) was expected to begin from the well before the applicable deadline in the definition of a qualified deep well in § 203.0. You must provide a credible activity schedule with supporting documentation.
( 4 ) The delay in beginning production is for reasons beyond your control, such as adverse weather and accidents which BSEE deems were unavoidable.
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-124505 and 333-155163) and Form S-3 (Nos. 333-141098 and 333-157269) and related Prospectus’ of our report dated March 26, 2010 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of OccuLogix, Inc. for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009.





/s/ Ernst & Young LLP








San Diego, California


March 26, 2010
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.463 Who establishes field drilling rules? ( a ) The District Manager may establish field drilling rules different from the requirements of this subpart when geological and engineering information shows that specific operating requirements are appropriate. You must comply with field drilling rules and nonconflicting requirements of this subpart. The District Manager may amend or cancel field drilling rules at any time.
( b ) You may request the District Manager to establish, amend, or cancel field drilling rules.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tumbleweed Communications Corp. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Timothy G.
Conley, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 9, 2005



|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ TIMOTHY G. CONLEY                                                         
|Timothy G. Conley Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Barry S. Baer, does hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:



1.              The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.              The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
of the Company.



|/s/ Jeff J. Huitt                                                                                 | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Jeff J. Huitt Chief Financial
        Officer, Principal
        Financial and Accounting Officer | 
|November 13, 2012                                                                                 |
Exhibit 32.1



TUMBLEWEED COMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES



Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Tumbleweed Communications Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Jeffrey C.
Smith, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 12, 2004



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ JEFFREY C. SMITH                                 
|Jeffrey C. Smith Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



This certification
accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.5




             REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Audit Committee and Board of Directors
Origen Financial, Inc.

We have examined management's assertion about Origen Financial, Inc. and its
subsidiaries compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005 included
in the accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible for Origen
Financial, Inc.'s compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about Origen Financial, Inc.'s compliance
with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on Origen Financial, Inc.'s compliance with the minimum
servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Origen Financial, Inc. and
subsidiaries complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2005 is fairly stated, in all material
respects.

/S/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Southfield, Michigan
February 13, 2006
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     I, Denise Barton, Chief Financial Officer of American Casino & Entertainment Properties LLC(the “Registrant”), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the annualreport on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 of the Registrant (the “Report”): (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.     By: /s/ Denise Barton     Denise Barton    Senior Vice President, Chief Financial    Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of    American Casino & Entertainment Properties LLC       Date: March 6, 2007
|     |                                                                                                                       |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|     |                                                                                                                                                      |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                                                                                              |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                              |
| /s/     LEWIS B. CAMPBELL                                           |
| Lewis B. CampbellExecutive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |
#### New England Savings Bank *v.*Dennis P. Nicotra et al.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14652.

*Thomas G. Benneche,*in support of the petition.

*Kellie J. Garner,*in opposition.

Decided December 3, 1992

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 11352), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether an order for disbursements of the receiver’s funds prior to vesting of title and assessment of a deficiency is an appealable interlocutory order?”
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          32,711                  32,711
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,962                  11,962
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,701                  46,701
<PP&E>                                          11,863                  11,863
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,328)                 (5,328)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  56,628                  56,628
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,350                  14,350
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            26                      26
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,353                  39,353
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,628                  56,628
<SALES>                                         10,090                  16,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,090                  16,700
<CGS>                                            3,192                   3,192
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,192                   3,192
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,735                  40,287
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  47                      86
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,472)                (28,006)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       150                     238
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,528)                (28,150)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,528)                (28,150)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.37)                  (1.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.37)                  (1.09)


</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsApplicability and Limitations of Reliability Allocation MethodsReliability allocation process may be described as the process of assigning reliability requirements to individual components within a system to attain the specified system reliability. For large systems, the allocation process is often performed at different stages of system design. The allocation process often begins at the conceptual stage. As the system design develops, more information about components and the operating environment becomes available, different allocation methods can be considered. Reliability allocation methods are usually divided into two categories: weighting factors and optimal reliability allocation. When properly applied, these methods can produce reasonable approximations. Reliability allocation techniques have limitations and implied assumptions that need to be understood by system engineers. Applying reliability allocation techniques without understanding their limitations and assumptions can produce unrealistic results. This report addresses weighting factors, optimal reliability allocation techniques, and identifies the applicability and limitations of each reliability allocation technique.Document ID20160013858Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsCruz, Jose A.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredNovember 30, 2016Publication DateNovember 1, 2016Subject CategoryStatistics And ProbabilityReport/Patent NumberGRC-E-DAA-TN20943NASA/TM-2016-218488E-19040Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 432938.10.02.03.11Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.KeywordsReliability allocationReliability allocation methodsReliabilityAvailable DownloadsNameType20160013858.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### **CHAPTER 203—SAFETY APPLIANCES**

Sec.
20301.
Definition and nonapplication.
20302.
General requirements.
20303.
Moving defective and insecure vehicles needing repairs.
20304.
Assumption of risk by employees.
20305.
Inspection of mail cars.
20306.
Exemption for technological improvements.
#### § 1228.3 Limitation on applicability.

As of the effective date of this rule, September 11, 1997, this part does not apply to Federal lands.

[62 FR 43091, Aug. 12, 1997]