alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(March 9, 1978)

#### In the Matter of Emanuel C. Aquart, Petitioner, v George Schoepfer, as Executive Officer and Chief Engineer of the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, et al., Respondents.

Determination, dated August 13, 1976, dismissing petitioner from his position as a bridge and tunnel officer because of his misregistration and nonregistration of 33 vehicles passing through his toll lane, unanimously annulled, on the law, and this matter remanded for a new hearing, without costs and without disbursements. Cross motion to dismiss the petition for legal insufficiency unanimously denied, without costs and without disbursements. The petitioner was found guilty on 33 specifications for either misregistering or nonregistering vari*901ous vehicles for his own personal benefit while collecting tolls on the Triborough Bridge during his tour on May 12, 1976. The determination was primarily based upon the testimony of two lieutenants in the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority. These two "checkers” observed the petitioner’s lane through binoculars from a distance of 500 feet. Normally, an overhead indicator flashed the classification of a vehicle as the appropriate toll was collected by a toll officer. Based upon their experience and their observations of the indicator over petitioner’s booth, the "checkers” were purportedly able to ascertain that the petitioner had misregistered or nonregistered 33 vehicles during his tour. Their testimony was buttressed by a computerized statistical analysis that suggested the petitioner had not collected the full amount of tolls ordinarily collected on that tour on that day of the week. As a result of its investigation, the authority claimed a discrepancy of $36.65 between petitioner’s actual and his projected receipts. This court is warranted in setting aside an administrative determination when there is no substantial evidence of a competent, probative force to sustain it. *(Matter of Reynolds v Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Auth.,*276 App Div 388, 392.) Both "checkers” testified that the overhead classification indicator malfunctioned intermittently during petitioner’s entire tour. Since the misregistration or nonregistration of a particular vehicle could have been attributable to this mechanical malfunction rather than the petitioner’s dishonesty, the hearing officer should have excluded the "checkers” testimony as it related to their observations of the overhead indicator. Likewise, the computerized statistical analysis should not have been received in evidence because a decrease in toll revenues on any particular day could be caused by many factors other than the petitioner’s alleged fraudulent practices. In sum, the petitioner was denied a fair hearing by the admission of the incompetent evidence discussed above. Therefore, the instant determination must be annulled and a new hearing ordered. The authority’s cross motion to dismiss the petition for legal insufficiency is correspondingly denied for its lack of merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Birns, Yesawich and Sandler, JJ.
```

[Federal Register: July 29, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 145)]
[Notices]               
[Page 44815]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr29jy10-78]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

 
National Endowment for the Arts; Arts Advisory Panel

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that one meeting 
of the Arts Advisory Panel to the National Council on the Arts will be 
held at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20506 as follows (ending time is approximate):
    AccessAbility (application review): August 19, 2010 by 
teleconference. This meeting, from 2 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. DST, will be 
closed.
    The closed portions of meetings are for the purpose of Panel 
review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on financial 
assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities 
Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in confidence to 
the agency. In accordance with the determination of the Chairman of 
November 10, 2009, these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant 
to subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels that are open to the public, and if time allows, may be 
permitted to participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion 
of the panel chairman. If you need any accommodations due to a 
disability, please contact the Office of AccessAbility, National 
Endowment for the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20506, 202/682-5532, TDY-TDD 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days 
prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to these meetings can be 
obtained from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel 
Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506, or 
call 202/682-5691.

     Dated: July 23, 2010.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 2010-18567 Filed 7-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
```
### §§721 to 723. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 721 to 723, relating to Territory of Hawaii, were omitted in view of admission of Hawaii into the Union.

Section 721, acts July 18, 1950, ch. 466, title I, §101, 64 Stat. 344; Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 783, title I, §107(3), (7), (9), 69 Stat. 637, 638, authorized Hawaiian government to undertake slum clearance and urban redevelopment and renewal projects.

Section 721a, acts July 18, 1950, ch. 466, title I, §102, 64 Stat. 344; Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 783, title I, §107(3), 69 Stat. 637, authorized government of Hawaii to assist slum clearance and urban redevelopment projects through cash donations, loans conveyances of real and personal property, facilities and services.

Section 721b, act July 18, 1950, ch. 466, title I, §103, 64 Stat. 345, ratified all legislation enacted by Legislature of Territory of Hawaii dealing with subject matter of sections 721 to 722 of this title.

Section 722, acts July 10, 1937, ch. 484, 50 Stat. 508; July 18, 1950, ch. 466, title II, §202(a), 64 Stat. 345, gave Legislature of Territory of Hawaii power to create public corporate authorities to engage in slum clearance, or housing undertaking.

Section 723, act June 27, 1934, ch. 847, §214, as added Apr. 23, 1949, ch. 89, §2(a), 63 Stat. 57, and amended, related to insurance of mortgages on property in Hawaii. See section 1715d of Title 12, Banks and Banking.
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date:May
                1, 2007
            By:*/s/ David A. Dodge*Name: David
                A. DodgeTitle: Chief
                Financial Officer and principal accounting
                officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. and will be
      retained by NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 964.135 Resident involvement in HA management operations. Residents shall be involved and participate in the overall policy development and direction of Public Housing operations. ( a ) Resident management corporations (RMCs) may contract with HAs to perform one or more management functions provided the resident entity has received sufficient training and/or has staff with the necessary expertise to perform the management functions and provided the RMC meets bonding and licensing requirements.
( b ) Residents shall be actively involved in a HA's decision-making process and give advice on matters such as modernization, security, maintenance, resident screening and selection, and recreation.
( c ) While a HA has responsibility for management operations, it shall ensure strong resident participation in all issues and facets of its operations through the duly elected resident councils at public housing developments, and with jurisdiction-wide resident councils.
( d ) A HA shall work in partnership with the duly elected resident councils.
( e ) HAs, upon request from the duly elected resident council, shall ensure that the duly elected resident council officers as defined in subpart B of this part, and other residents in the development are fully trained and involved in developing and implementing Federal programs including but not limited to Comprehensive Improvement Assistance Program (CIAP), Comprehensive Grant Program, Urban Revitalization Demonstration, Drug Elimination, and FIC.
( f ) HAs shall involve resident council officers and other interested residents at the development through education and direct participation in all phases of the budgetary process.
( g ) Resident council officers shall be encouraged to become involved in the resident screening and selection process for prospective residents at the development. Those selected to perform resident screening and selection functions must be trained by the HA in resident screening and selection and must sign a legal document committing to confidentiality.
| **Financial Instruments and Commodity Contracts - Foreign Currency Contracts (Details) (Foreign Exchange Contract [Member])In Millions, unless otherwise specified** | Jan. 31, 2014EUR (€) | Oct. 31, 2013EUR (€) | Oct. 31, 2013Contract 1 [Member]USD ($) | Oct. 31, 2013Contract 1 [Member]CAD | Oct. 31, 2013Contract 2 [Member]CAD |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| **Derivative [Line Items]**                                                                                                                                          |                        |                        |                                    |                                |                                |
| Derivative, Notional Amount                                                                                                                                          | € 20                 | € 2                  | $ 25                                    | 90                                  | 50                                  |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Aggregate notional amount specified by the derivative(s). Expressed as an absolute value.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Regulation S-X (SX) -Number 210 -Article 12 -Section 13 -Sentence Column B
+ Details**Name:**invest_DerivativeNotionalAmount**Namespace Prefix:**invest_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                       |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_DerivativeLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
Opinion issued September 25 , 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 18
- 00678
- CV

——————————— IN RE YOGURT CULTURE , INC. , Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION ON REHEARING Relator, Yogurt Culture, Inc., filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the county court’s judgment awarding Houston House Limited Partnership possession of the leased premises at issue in the underlying forcible detainer action. 1 After our Court denied the petition on August 16, 2018 , Yogurt

1 The underlying case is Houston House Limited Partnership v. Yogurt Culture, Inc., and All Occupants , cause number 1110605, pending in the County Civil Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Sharolyn Wood presiding.2

Culture filed a motion for rehearing. We deny the motion for rehearing but issue this supplemental opinion explaining our basis for denying the mandamus petition

. Yogurt Culture leased a commer cial space from Houston House Limited Partnership. Alleging violations of the lease, Houston House filed an original petition for eviction in the justice court. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of Houston House. Yogurt Culture appealed the justice cour t verdict. On de novo appeal, the county court issued a final judgment likewise awarding possession of the premises to Houston House. Yogurt Culture subsequently filed its petition for writ of mandamus challenging the judgment. Section 24.007 of the Texas Property Code provides that “A final judgment of a county court in an eviction suit may not be appealed on the issue of possession unless the premises in question are being used for residential purposes only.” T EX
. P ROP
. C ODE § 24.007. Because the premises leased by Yogurt Culture were used for commercial purposes, we lack jurisdiction over an appeal as it relates to the issue of possession. A party to an eviction suit in a county court cannot use a writ of mandamus to accomplish an appeal prohibited by Sec tion 24.007. Mullins v.
Coussons , 745 S.W.2d 50, 51 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 1987, orig. proceeding); Cavazos v. Hancock , 686 S.W.2d 284, 287 (Tex. App.

— Amarillo 1985, no writ); see also Chang v. Resolution Tr. Corp ., 814 S.W.2d 543, 545 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 1991, orig. proceeding) (denying writ of3

prohibition/injunction in connection with attempted appeal of eviction action, noting that “We have we have no jurisdiction to review the issue of possession in a forcible
detainer action where t he premises are used for commercial purposes.”). Allowing the use of a writ of mandamus to control the county court’s non

- appealable exercise of discretion would permit the very appeal Section 24.007 was enacted to prohibit. Mullins , 745 S.W.2d at 51.
Acc ordingly, Yogurt Culture’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

Jane Bland Justice

Panel consists of Justice s Keyes, Bland, and Lloyd

.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2

                        CHINA FINANCE ONLINE CO. LIMITED

                                  Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned, Jeff Wang, Chief Financial
Officer of China Finance Online Co. Limited (the "Company"), hereby certifies,
to his knowledge, that the Company's annual report on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: May 29, 2007                  /s/ Jeff Wang

                                    -------------------------------
                                    Name:  Jeff Wang
                                    Title: Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
Exhibit 32

Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the filing of the financial statements of China Sun Group High Tech Co.
(Registrant) for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2007 (the Report),
each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

September 6, 2007

| | /s/ Bin Wang
Bin Wang
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Ming Fen Liu
Ming Fen Liu
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
##### 



Exhibit 10.2
 EIGHTEENTH AMENDMENT TO
LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT
 Agent Midway Borrower Borrowers Parent MGW MI MSC MHS Surreal U.S. Credit Party U.S. Credit Parties
 Loan Agreement
   Defined Terms
 Amendment to Loan Agreement Exhibit A
 Ratification
 Conditions to Effectiveness




---



##### 



Miscellaneous
 Warranties and Absence of Defaults
 Expenses
 Governing Law
 Counterparts
 Release.
   -2-




---



##### 



-3-




---



##### 



MIDWAY HOME ENTERTAINMENT INC.,a Delaware corporationMIDWAY AMUSEMENT GAMES, LLC,a Delaware limited liability companyMIDWAY GAMES INC.,a Delaware corporationMIDWAY GAMES WEST INC.,a California corporationMIDWAY INTERACTIVE INC.,a Delaware corporationMIDWAY SALES COMPANY, LLC,a Delaware limited liability companyMIDWAY HOME STUDIOS INC.,a Delaware corporationSURREAL SOFTWARE INC.,a Washington corporationMIDWAY STUDIOS  AUSTIN INC.,a Texas corporationMIDWAY STUDIOS  LOS ANGELES INC.,a California corporationEach By
    
    /s/ Thomas E. PowellTitle: Executive Vice President  Finance, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer




---



##### 



WELLS FARGO FOOTHILL, INC.,a California corporation, as Agent, as UK Security Trustee and as a LenderBy
    
    /s/ Peter SchueblerTitle Vice President
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IMPSAT Fiber Networks, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the Report)
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Ricardo Verdaguer, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by
the Chief Executive Officer of the Company with the requirements of Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be disclosed, distributed or
used by any person or for any reason other than as specifically required by
law.

|                |  |                                                                                
|--------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|August 14, 2002 |  | /s/ RICARDO VERDAGUERRicardo A. Verdaguer
President and Chief Executive Officer
130 STAT. 1510 PUBLIC LAW 114–297—DEC. 16, 2016 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5356: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

Sept. 20, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 5, considered and passed Senate; passage vitiated. 

Dec. 9, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–297 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 14231 

TX–150 in Coldspring, Texas, as the ‘‘E. Marie Youngblood Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. E. MARIE YOUNGBLOOD POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 14231 TX–150 in Coldspring, Texas, shall be 

known and designated as the ‘‘E. Marie Youngblood Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘E. Marie Youngblood Post Office’’. 

Approved December 16, 2016. 

Dec. 16, 2016 

[H.R. 5356] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
### **CHAPTER 117—ENFORCEMENT: INVESTIGATIONS, RIGHTS, AND REMEDIES**

Sec.
11701.
General authority.
11702.
Enforcement by the Board.
11703.
Enforcement by the Attorney General.
11704.
Rights and remedies of persons injured by rail carriers.
11705.
Limitation on actions by and against rail carriers.
11706.
Liability of rail carriers under receipts and bills of lading.
11707.
Liability when property is delivered in violation of routing instructions.
11708.
Voluntary arbitration of certain rail rates and practice disputes. 1

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2015**—Pub. L. 114–110, §13(b), Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 2237, added item 11708.

1  So in original. Does not conform to section catchline.