alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§1686, 1687. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1686, act July 31, 1953, ch. 298, title I, 67 Stat. 274, which prohibited new activity in the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands requiring expenditures of Federal funds without specific prior approval of Congress, was not repeated in subsequent appropriation acts. Section was formerly classified to section 1439 of this title.

Section 1687, act Nov. 4, 1983, Pub. L. 98–146, title I, 97 Stat. 932, which provided that appropriations available for administration of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands could be expended for purchase, etc., of surface vessels for official expenses and for commercial transportation expenses, was from the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 1984, and was not repeated in subsequent appropriation acts. Section was formerly classified to section 1440 of this title. Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Dec. 30, 1982, Pub. L. 97–394, title I, 96 Stat. 1979.

Dec. 23, 1981, Pub. L. 97–100, title I, 95 Stat. 1402.

Dec. 12, 1980, Pub. L. 96–514, title I, 94 Stat. 2969.

Nov. 27, 1979, Pub. L. 96–126, title I, 93 Stat. 966.

Oct. 17, 1978, Pub. L. 95–465, title I, 92 Stat. 1289.

July 26, 1977, Pub. L. 95–74, title I, 91 Stat. 295.

July 31, 1976, Pub. L. 94–373, title I, 90 Stat. 1053.

Dec. 23, 1975, Pub. L. 94–165, title I, 89 Stat. 988.

Aug. 31, 1974, Pub. L. 93–404, title I, 88 Stat. 813.

Oct. 4, 1973, Pub. L. 93–120, title I, 87 Stat. 434.

Aug. 10, 1972, Pub. L. 92–369, title I, 86 Stat. 513.

Aug. 10, 1971, Pub. L. 92–76, title I, 85 Stat. 233.

July 31, 1970, Pub. L. 91–361, title I, 84 Stat. 673.

Oct. 29, 1969, Pub. L. 91–98, title I, 83 Stat. 152.

July 26, 1968, Pub. L. 90–425, title I, 82 Stat. 431.

June 24, 1967, Pub. L. 90–28, title I, 81 Stat. 63.

May 31, 1966, Pub. L. 89–435, title I, 80 Stat. 174.

June 28, 1965, Pub. L. 89–52, title I, 79 Stat. 179.

July 7, 1964, Pub. L. 88–356, title I, 78 Stat. 278.

July 26, 1963, Pub. L. 88–79, title I, 77 Stat. 102.

Aug. 9, 1962, Pub. L. 87–578, title I, 76 Stat. 340.

Aug. 3, 1961, Pub. L. 87–122, title I, 75 Stat. 251.

May 13, 1960, Pub. L. 86–455, title I, 74 Stat. 113.

June 23, 1959, Pub. L. 86–60, title I, 73 Stat. 101.

June 4, 1958, Pub. L. 85–439, title I, 72 Stat. 164.

July 1, 1957, Pub. L. 85–77, title I, 71 Stat. 266.

June 13, 1956, ch. 380, title I, 70 Stat. 265.

June 16, 1955, ch. 147, title I, 69 Stat. 149.

July 1, 1954, ch. 446, title I, 68 Stat. 372.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 20

- 00481

- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF A.M . , Jr., a Child From the 225 th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019PA00115 Honorable H. Paul Canales , Judge Presiding Opinion by: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Beth Watkins , Justice Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice Delivered and Filed: December 30, 2020 AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW DENIED
A ppellant mo ther (“Mother”) appeals the trial court’s order terminating her parental rights to her child, A.M

. , Jr. Mother’s court

- appointed appellate counsel filed a motion to withdraw and a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record, concluding there are no arguable grounds for reversal of the termination order. The brief satisfies the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re P.M. , 520 S.W.3d 24, 27 n.10 (Tex. 2016) (per curiam) (recognizing that Anders procedures apply in parental termination cases). Additionally, counsel represents that he provided Mother with a copy of the br ief and the motion to withdraw, advised Mother of her right to review the record and file her own brief, and informed Mother how to obtain
a copy o f the record, providing her with a form motion for access to the appellate record. We04

- 20

- 00481

- CV

- 2

- issued an order setting a deadline for Mother to file a pro se brief. However, Mother did not request the appellate record or file a pro se brief. After reviewing the appellate record and appointed counsel’s brief, we conclude no plausible grounds exist for reversal of the termination order. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s termination order. We deny counsel’s motion to withdraw because it does not show good

c ause for withdrawal. See id. at 27 & n.7 ( holding that counsel’s obligations in a parental termination case extend through exhaustion or waiver of all appeals and that withdrawal should be permitted by a court of appeals “only for good cause” (citing T EX
. R. C IV
. P. 10)). Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
```

[114th Congress Public Law 298]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 130 STAT. 1511]]

Public Law 114-298
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  810 N US Highway 83 in Zapata, Texas, as the ``Zapata Veterans Post 
            Office''. <<NOTE: Dec. 16, 2016 -  [H.R. 5591]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ZAPATA VETERANS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 810 N US Highway 83 in Zapata, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Zapata Veterans Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Zapata 
Veterans Post Office''.

    Approved December 16, 2016.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5591:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016):
            Sept. 20, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 5, considered and passed Senate; passage vitiated.
            Dec. 9, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7248
STEVEN CHARLES WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MONIQUE EPPERSON, Medical Supervisor, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Ric hard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-42) Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 17, 1996 Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven Charles Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Epperson , No. CA-95-42 (E.D. Va. Aug. 8, 1995).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank

# AGENCY:

Export-Import Bank.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Charter of the Export-Import Bank of the United States, this notice is to inform the public that the Export-Import Bank of the United States has received an application for $8.56 million in medium-term loan insurance to support the export of approximately $7.4 million worth of engineering services, grinding technology, steam heating and other mechanical equipment. The U.S. exports will enable the Brazilian company to double production at an existing facility, allowing it to produce up to 3 million liters a day of ethanol, 574 thousand metric tons a year of Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles (DDGS) and 36,500 liters a year of Corn Oil. Production of ethanol and corn oil will be sold primarily in Brazil. New production of DDGS will be sold primarily in Brazil, with smaller amounts to Europe and Asia

# DATES:

                        Comments are due 14 days from publication in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# ADDRESSES:

                        Interested parties may submit comments on this transaction electronically on                         *www.regulations.gov,*                         or by email to                         *economic.impact@exim.gov.*

Scott Condren,

Policy Analysis.

[FR Doc. 2020-27371 Filed 12-11-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
#### § 964.14 HUD policy on partnerships.

HUD promotes partnerships between residents and HAs which are an essential component to building, strengthening and improving public housing. Strong partnerships are critical for creating positive changes in lifestyles thus improving the quality of life for public housing residents, and the surrounding community.
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive
        - Marine Mammal Commission

#  Marine Mammal Commission 

**Collected by:** Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive 

**Archived since:**Feb, 2014

**Description:**
The Marine Mammal Commission is an independent agency of the U.S. Government, established under Title II of the Act to provide independent oversight of the marine mammal conservation policies and programs being carried out by federal regulatory agencies.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal,     	    Environment & Energy,     	    Science & Technology

**Creator:**    	    Marine Mammal Commission

**Language:**    	    English

**Collector:**    	    U.S. Government Publishing Office

## Narrow Your Results

### 

            There are no further ways to narrow your results.           

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear

              - Sites
              - Search Page Text

Page 1 of 1  (4 Total Results)

**Sort By:**
                - Title (A-Z)
                - Title (Z-A)
                - URL (A-Z)
                - URL (Z-A)

### URL:     http://www.mmc.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://twitter.com/marinemammalcom/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.mmc.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.youtube.com/@marinemammalcommission2849/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

Page 1 of 1  (4 Total Results)

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 

REGION IX
 

75 Hawthorne Street
 

San Francisco, CA 94105·3901
 

DEC 1 1 2009 

OFFICE OF THE 

REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR 

The Honorable Arnold Schwarzenegger 

Governor of California 

State Capitol Building 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Dear Governor Schwarzenegger: 

I am writing concerning California's efforts to comply with Clean Air Act (CAA) 

requirements to meet the I-hour national ambient air quality standard for ozone 

(NAAQS). Specifically, by December 31, 2000, States with areas designated severe or 

extreme nonattainment for the NAAQS were required to submit State Implementation 

Plan revisions (SIPs) to implement nonattainment fee requirements described in CAA 

section 185. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District ofColumbia Circuit has ruled 

that these SIPs are required despite EPA's revocation of the I-hour NAAQS. EPA 

recognizes the need to implement the law consistent with the court's decision and, 

through today's letter, is notifying California that EPA intends to make a CAA section 

179(a) finding of failure to submit section 185 SIPs for the Los Angeles-South Coast, 

Southeast Desert and portions ofthe Sacramento Metropolitan I-hour ozone 

nonattainment areas. 

This finding would become effective upon publication of a rulemaking notice 

announcing the finding in the Federal Register. Once the finding becomes effective, if 

California does not submit timely SIPs for these areas, sanction and Federal 

Implementation Plan (FIP) obligations will apply as described in CAA sections 11 O(c) 

and 179. 

We understand that California agencies are interested in developing alternative 

equivalent fee programs that address the CAA section 185 requirements. EPA intends to 

issue guidance on CAA section 185 shortly, and intends to work closely with the 

California Air Resources Board and affected local agencies (Placer County Air Pollution 

Control District and Antelope Valley, El Dorado County, Feather River, South Coast and 

Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management Districts) to develop complete and approvable 

SIPs that obviate sanction and FIP obligations and meet local needs. Please have your 

staff contact Deborah Jordan (415-947-8715) with questions in this regard. 

Sincerely, 

Laura Yos ii 

Acting Regional Administrator 

Printed on Recycled Paper 
Page 2 

cc: Mary Nichols, Chairman 

California Air Resources Board 

James Goldstene, Executive Officer

California Air Resources Board

Eldon Heaston, Executive Director 

Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District 

Marcella McTaggart, Air Pollution Control Officer 

El Dorado County Air Quality Management District 

Dave ValIer, Air Pollution Control Officer 

Feather River Air Quality Management District 

Tom Christofk, Air Pollution Control Officer 

Placer County Air Pollution Control District 

Larry Greene, Air Pollution Control Officer 

Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District 

Dr. Barry Wallerstein, Executive Officer 

South Coast Air Quality Management District 

Mat Ehrhardt, Air Pollution Control Officer 

Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District
### §1693. Audit of government; access to books, records, etc.

The Comptroller General of the United States, or any of his duly authorized representatives, shall have access, for the purpose of audit and examination, to any relevant books, documents, papers, or records of the government of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands.

(Pub. L. 92–257, §6, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 88.)
§ 203.49 May I substitute the deep gas drilling provisions in this part for the deep gas royalty relief provided in my lease terms? ( a ) You may exercise an option to replace the applicable lease terms for royalty relief related to deep-well drilling with those in § 203.0 and §§ 203.40 through 203.48 if you have a lease issued with royalty relief provisions for deep-well drilling. Such leases: ( 1 ) Must be issued as part of an OCS lease sale held after January 1, 2001, and before April 1, 2004; and
( 2 ) Must be located wholly west of 87 degrees, 30 minutes West longitude in the GOM entirely or partly in water less than 200 meters deep.
( b ) To exercise the option under paragraph (a) of this section, you must notify, in writing, the BSEE Regional Supervisor for Production and Development of your decision before September 1, 2004, or 180 days after your lease is issued, whichever is later, and specify the lease and block number.
( c ) Once you exercise the option under paragraph (a) of this section, you are subject to all the activity, timing, and administrative requirements pertaining to deep gas royalty relief as specified in §§ 203.40 through 203.48.
( d ) Exercising the option under paragraph (a) of this section is irrevocable. If you do not exercise this option, then the terms of your lease apply.
Exhibit 10.5 


 


TERM NOTE (2022)


 





	$2,000,000.00	 	October 31, 2022
	 	 	Stamford, CT






 


The undersigned, for value
received, jointly and severally promise to pay to the order of Slipstream Communications, LLC
(the “Lender”) at its office in Stamford, Connecticut (or such other office designated by the Lender from time to time)
the aggregate unpaid amount of all Advances under the Term Loan (2022) made to the undersigned by the Lender pursuant to the Credit Agreement
referred to below, such principal amount to be payable in the amounts and on the dates set forth in the Credit Agreement.


 


The undersigned further jointly
and severally promise to pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of each Advance under the Term Loan (2022) from the date of such
loan until the Term Loan (2022) is paid in full, payable at the rate(s) and at the time(s) set forth in the Credit Agreement. Payments
of both principal and interest are to be made in lawful money of the United States and in immediately available funds.


 


This Note evidences indebtedness
incurred under, and is subject to the terms and provisions of, that certain Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated
as of February 15, 2022 (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”;
terms not otherwise defined herein are used herein as defined in the Credit Agreement), by and between the undersigned and the Lender,
to which Credit Agreement reference is hereby made for a statement of the terms and provisions under which this Note may or must be paid
prior to its due date or its due date accelerated.


 


This Note is made under and
governed by the laws of the State of New York applicable to contracts made and to be performed entirely within such State.


 


The undersigned shall pay
all costs of collection, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and legal expenses if this Note is not paid when due, whether or not
legal proceedings are commenced.


 


[Signature Page Follows]


 




     


     


    

 


Presentment or other demand
for payment, notice of dishonor and protest are expressly waived.


 


	 	Creative Realities,
    Inc.
	 	Creative Realities
    Canada, Inc.
	 	Allure Global
    Solutions, Inc.
	 	Reflect Systems,
    Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Will Logan
	 	Name:	Will Logan
	 	Title:	Chief Financial Officer



  


Signature Page to Term
Note (2022)
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### §§ 250.202-250.203 [Reserved]
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Stephan Kuppenheimer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of Merrill Lynch Depositor,
Inc., on behalf of PPLUS Trust Series JPM-1;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and
the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based
upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trustee
have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance
by the depositor or trustee with the minimum servicing or similar standards
based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program
for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling or
servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York and
its officers and agents.


Date: March 27, 2006                          /s/ Stephan Kuppenheimer
                                             -----------------------------------
                                              President
P. 1 OAR Box 1787 Prepped by Ollie Stewart

Document

Number: 90 ) ll-C-4 8 Docket Number: A-90-3 7

Printed 11/4/200810:22:20 AM

Sheet 90 of 147P. 2

A-90-3 7 ll-C-48 ll-C-4 8 i s not a missin g document . ll-C-4 8 wa s accidentl y skippe d i n th e numberin g sequenc e ofth e index .
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted August 25, 2015*

Decided August 25, 2015

Before

RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

No. 15-1829

JOSEPH LEE BELL, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

GREGORY WAYNE NAWROCKI, et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District 

Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

No. 15-cv-249-pp

Pamela Pepper,

Judge.

O R D E R

Joseph Bell filed this action in federal court against his Milwaukee landlord and 

two other men. Essentially he alleges that his landlord tried to pressure him into 

abandoning his apartment by withholding adequate heat and hiring the other 

defendants—one of them a neighborhood drug dealer—to provoke a physical 

 

* The appellees were not served with process in the district court and are not 

participating in this appeal. After examining the appellant’s brief and the record, we 

have concluded that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See FED. R. APP.

P. 34(a)(2). 

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
No. 15-1829 Page 2

altercation and give the landlord a pretext to evict him. The action of the defendants, Bell 

claims, violated the terms of his lease as well as state landlord-tenant laws. 

The district court screened Bell’s complaint, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); Rowe v. 

Shake, 196 F.3d 778, 783 (7th Cir. 1999), and dismissed the action after concluding that 

Bell does not assert any claims under federal law or allege diversity jurisdiction over his 

state-law claims. Bell appeals, but he does not dispute the absence of diversity 

jurisdiction. And, as the district court explained, there is no federal-question jurisdiction 

because Bell’s complaint raises only state-law claims. Thus the district court properly 

dismissed the case for want of subject-matter jurisdiction. 

AFFIRMED.