alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                     FORM 15

   Certification  and Notice of Termination of Registration  under Section 12(g)
  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Suspension of Duty to File Reports
       Under Sections 13 and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


                         Commission File Number: 1-9618

                       NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

                         455 North Cityfront Plaza Drive
                             Chicago, Illinois 60611
                                 (312) 836-2000
    (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code,
                  of registrant's principal executive offices)

$6.00 Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, Series G (with $1.00 par value)
         (Title of each class of securities covered by this Form)

                     Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share
                 Cumulative Convertible Junior Preference Stock,
                         Series D (with $1.00 par value)
                        Series B 7% Senior Notes due 2003
                 Series B 8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008
              (Title of all other classes of securities for which a
           duty to file reports under Section 13(a) or 15(d) remains)


Please place an X in the box(es) to designate the appropriate rule  provision(s)
relied upon to terminate or suspend the duty to file reports:

      Rule 12g-4(a)(1)(i)       [X]             Rule 12h-3(b)(1)(ii)      [ ]
      Rule 12g-4(a)(1)(ii)      [ ]             Rule 12h-3(b)(2)(i)       [ ]
      Rule 12g-4(a)(2)(i)       [ ]             Rule 12h-3(b)(2)(ii)      [ ]
      Rule 12g-4(a)(2)(ii)      [ ]             Rule 15d-6                [ ]
      Rule 12h-3(b)(1)(i)       [ ]

Approximate number of holders of record as of the certification or notice date:
$6.00 Cumulative Convertible  Preferred Stock, Series G (with $1.00 par value):
None.

Pursuant to the  requirements of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  Navistar
International Corporation,  has caused this certification/notice to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned duly authorized person.

                                      NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL
                                      CORPORATION


Date: October 27, 1999                 By:    /s/ Mark T. Schwetschenau
                                             ---------------------------------
                                      Name:       Mark T. Schwetschenau
                                      Title:      Vice President and Controller
                                                  (Principal Accounting Officer)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6023
JIMMIE DONALD CREECH, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-1128-2) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: July 30, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jimmie Donald Creech, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Shea, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his habeas corpus petition, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1217. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent thata certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Creech v. Angelone , No. CA-94-1128-2 (E.D. VA. Nov. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 19.9 Performance. In addition to the general design and the safety features, MSHA considers that a lamp of permissible type should meet certain minimum requirements with respect to performance, as follows: ( a ) *Time of burning and candlepower.* Permissible electric cap lamps shall burn for at least 10 consecutive hours on one charge of the battery and shall give during that period a mean candlepower of light beam of not less than 1.
( b ) *Bulb life.* The average life of the bulbs shall be not less than 200 hours, and at least 92 percent of the bulbs shall have a life of 150 hours. The life of a bulb is the number of hours its main filament will burn in the cap lamp or its equivalent. The life of a bulb having main filaments in parallel is considered ended when the first filament ceases to burn; the life of a bulb having independent main filament is considered ended when the last filament ceases to burn.
( c ) *Bulb uniformity.* ( 1 ) The bulbs submitted shall meet the following minimum requirements for variation in current consumption and candlepower:
( 2 ) The current consumption of at least 94 percent of the bulbs shall not exceed the average current by more than 6 percent. The candlepower (s. cp.) of at least 90 percent of the bulbs shall not fall short of the average candlepower by more than 30 percent.
( d ) *Corrosion of contacts.* Battery terminals and leads therefrom, as well as the battery gas vents, shall be designed to minimize corrosion of the electrical contacts.
[Sched. 6D, 4 FR 4003, Sept. 21, 1939, as amended at 47 FR 11369, Mar. 16, 1982]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMBINED
AND  CONSOLIDATED   FINANCIAL   STATEMENTS  OF  TRENDWEST   RESORTS,   INC.  AND
SUBSIDIARIES  AND IS QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>      1,000

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,254
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   95,750
<ALLOWANCES>                                    16,126
<INVENTORY>                                     41,215
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          23,133
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,737
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 201,035
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        61,279
<OTHER-SE>                                     105,932
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   201,035
<SALES>                                        175,393
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               205,193
<CGS>                                           52,179
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,435
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                12,234
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,514
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,996
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,518
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,518
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.54





</TABLE>
### §1454. Guard bands and unlicensed use

#### (a) In general

Nothing in subparagraph (G) of section 309(j)(8) of this title or in section 1452 of this title shall be construed to prevent the Commission from using relinquished or other spectrum to implement band plans with guard bands.

#### (b) Size of guard bands

Such guard bands shall be no larger than is technically reasonable to prevent harmful interference between licensed services outside the guard bands.

#### (c) Unlicensed use in guard bands

The Commission may permit the use of such guard bands for unlicensed use.

#### (d) Database

Unlicensed use shall rely on a database or subsequent methodology as determined by the Commission.

#### (e) Protections against harmful interference

The Commission may not permit any use of a guard band that the Commission determines would cause harmful interference to licensed services.

(Pub. L. 112–96, title VI, §6407, Feb. 22, 2012, 126 Stat. 231.)
### §643. Enforcement

It shall be unlawful for an entity or individual to willfully and knowingly, or recklessly, submit information or data under this subchapter that is materially inaccurate or incomplete with respect to the availability of broadband internet access service or the quality of service with respect to broadband internet access service.

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title VIII, §803, as added Pub. L. 116–130, §2, Mar. 23, 2020, 134 Stat. 236.)
Exhibit 99.1



Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tumbleweed Communications Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), Jeffrey C. Smith, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 12,
2003



|/s/    JEFFREY C.
SMITHJeffrey C. Smith Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------



This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
MEPC 60/INF.14

I:\MEPC\60\INF-14.doc ANNEX

TYPE APPROVAL CERTIFICATION OF THE NK-O3 BLUEBA LLAST SYSTEMMEPC 60/INF.14 ANNEX Page 2

I:\MEPC\60\INF-14.docMEPC 60/INF.14 ANNEX

Page 3

I:\MEPC\60\INF-14.docMEPC 60/INF.14 ANNEX Page 4

I:\MEPC\60\INF-14.doc __________
### **CHAPTER 155—RATES**

Sec.
15501.
Standards for pipeline rates, classifications, through routes, rules, and practices.
15502.
Authority for pipeline carriers to establish rates, classifications, rules, and practices.
15503.
Authority and criteria: rates, classifications, rules, and practices prescribed by Board.
15504.
Government traffic.
15505.
Prohibition against discrimination by pipeline carriers.
15506.
Facilities for interchange of traffic.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tumbleweed Communications Corp. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Timothy G. Conley, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 9, 2007



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ TIMOTHY G. CONLEY                                      
|Timothy G. Conley                                          
|Senior Vice President of Finance andChief Financial Officer
§ 1204.208 May a State decide that it will or will not allow one or both of the relief options under this subpart? ( a ) A State may decide in advance that it will or will not allow one or both of the relief options specified in this subpart for a particular calendar year. If a State decides that it will not consent to one or both of the relief options, ONRR will not grant that type of marginal property relief.
( b ) To help States decide whether to allow one or both of the relief options specified in this subpart, for each calendar year ONRR will send States a Report of Marginal Properties by October 1 preceding the calendar year.
( c ) If a State decides under paragraph (a) of this section that it will or will not allow one or both of the relief options in this subpart during the next calendar year, within 30 days of the State's receipt of the Report of Marginal Properties under paragraph (b) of this section, the State must: ( 1 ) Notify the Director for Office of Natural Resources Revenue, in writing, of its intent to allow or not allow one or both of the relief options under this subpart; and
( 2 ) Specify in its notice of intent to ONRR which relief option(s) it will allow or not allow.
( d ) If a State decides in advance under paragraph (a) of this section that it will not allow one or both of the relief options specified in this subpart, it may decide for subsequent calendar years that it will allow one or both of the relief options in this subpart. If it so decides, within 30 days of the State's receipt of the Report of Marginal Properties under paragraph (b) of this section, the State must: ( 1 ) Notify the Director for Office of Natural Resources Revenue, in writing, of its intent to allow one or both of the relief options allowed under this subpart during the next calendar year; and
( 2 ) Specify in its notice of intent to ONRR which relief option(s) it will allow.
( e ) If a State does not notify ONRR under paragraph (c) or (d) of this section, the State will be deemed to have decided not to allow either of the relief options under this subpart for the next calendar year.
( f ) ONRR will publish a notice of the State's intent to allow or not allow certain relief options under this section in the Federal Register no later than 30 days before the beginning of the applicable calendar year.
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.123 [Reserved]
#### § 203.259 Method of payment of MIP.

The payment of any MIP under this subpart shall be made to the Commissioner by the mortgagee either in cash or debentures at par plus accrued interest.

[48 FR 28805, June 23, 1983]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted), Joseph Y. Liu, Chief Executive Officer of Oplink
Communications, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:

1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31,
2003, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "QUARTERLY
REPORT") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition at the end of the period covered by
the Quarterly Report and results of operations of the Company for the periods
covered by the Quarterly Report.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hands hereto as of the 10th day
of February, 2004.

/s/ Joseph Y. Liu
---------------------------------------------
Joseph Y. Liu
Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Eldred J. Hall

*Lowell Lee Paterson*and *Louise Van Dyck,*in support of the petition.

*PaulJ. Ferencek,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided October 2, 1992

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 28 Conn. App. 771, is denied.
§ 85.1 Applicability of and cross reference to 2 CFR part 200. ( a ) Federal awards with State, local and Indian tribal governments are subject to the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards at 2 CFR part 200.
( b ) Federal awards made prior to December 26, 2014 will continue to be governed by the regulations in effect and codified in 24 CFR part 85 (2013 edition) or as provided by the terms of the Federal award. Where the terms of a Federal award made prior to December 26, 2014, state that the award will be subject to regulations as may be amended, the Federal award shall be subject to 2 CFR part 200.
[79 FR 76079, Dec. 19, 2014]
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT


TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned Officer of ERF Wireless, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





November 22, 2010
/s/ H. Dean Cubley

H. Dean Cubley

Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of General Communication, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald
A. Duncan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


Date:  March 5, 2004                   /s/
                                       Ronald A. Duncan
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       General Communication, Inc.


                                       1
<PAGE>
          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of General Communication, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John M.
Lowber, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.



Date:  March 5, 2004                   /s/
                                       John M. Lowber
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       General Communication, Inc.



                                       2
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPreliminary investigation of stability of a fin-stiffened slender strutA fin-stiffened strut concept which possesses high bending stiffness and low packaged volume has been identified for use on large space structures. The concept incorporates three curved fins which deploy from a core tube to increase the effective cross-sectional moment of inertia, the buckling load, and the vibration frequency of the strut. A strut design incorporating welded fin connections provides an upper bound of the strut buckling load. A strut design which allows the individual fins and core to move independently in the strut axial direction provides a lower bound of the strut buckling load which is approximately 20 to 25 percent of the upper bound. A practical strut design, incorporating hinge assemblies which constrain the fins to move together but independently of the core tube in the strut axial direction, provides a buckling load which is 75 to 80 percent of the upper bound. Euler's equation can be used to accurately predict buckling loads for the bounding designs. Flat plate finite element models of all designs give results that agree to within 10 percent of the experimental values. Equivalent beam models of the strut give results which are slightly less accurate.Document ID19880010184Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsLake, Mark S.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Wu, K. Chauncey*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1988Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberL-16411NASA-TM-4034NAS 1.15:4034Accession Number88N19568Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-43-41-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19880010184.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024