alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1210.104 Must I submit these production reports electronically? ( a ) You must submit Forms ONRR-4054 and ONRR-4058 electronically unless you qualify for an exception under § 1210.105.
( b ) As of December 31, 2011, all reporters/payors must report to ONRR electronically via the eCommerce Reporting Web site. All reporters/payors also must report production data directly or upload files using the ONRR electronic web form located at *https://onrrreporting.onrr.gov .* You must upload your files in one of the following formats: The American Standard Code for information interchange (ASCII) or Comma Separated Values (CSV) formats. You must create your external files in the proprietary ASCII and CSV file layout formats defined by ONRR. You can generate these external files from your system application. Reporters/payors also can access detailed information and instructions regarding how to use the eCommerce Reporting Web site at *http://www.onrr.gov/FM/PDFDocs/eCommerce_FAQ.pdf .*
( c ) Refer to our electronic reporting guidelines in the ONRR *Minerals Production Reporter Handbook* for the most current reporting options, instructions, and security measures. The handbook may be found on our Internet Web site or you may call your ONRR customer service representative (see § 1210.106 for further information on how to obtain a handbook).
[73 FR 15892, Mar. 26, 2008, as amended at 77 FR 25880, May 2, 2012]
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Shengtai Pharmaceutical, Inc., the
“Company,” on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the “Report,” I,
Qingtai Liu , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.       The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.       That
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
September 28, 2010





SHENGTAI
      PHARMACEUTICAL, INC./s/ Qingtai LiuQingtai
      LiuChief
      Executive Officer
### §2193. Application of regulation to Puerto Rico

#### (a) Special rule

The regulations proposed by the Secretary of Labor relating to exemptions regarding the rates of pay for executive, administrative, professional, outside sales, and computer employees, and published in a notice in the Federal Register on July 6, 2015, and any final regulations issued related to such notice, shall have no force or effect in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico until—

(1) the Comptroller General of the United States completes the assessment and transmits the report required under subsection (b); and

(2) the Secretary of Labor, taking into account the assessment and report of the Comptroller General, provides a written determination to Congress that applying such rule to Puerto Rico would not have a negative impact on the economy of Puerto Rico.

#### (b) Assessment and report

Not later than two years after June 30, 2016, the Comptroller General shall examine the economic conditions in Puerto Rico and shall transmit a report to Congress assessing the impact of applying the regulations described in subsection (a) to Puerto Rico, taking into consideration regional, metropolitan, and non-metropolitan salary and cost-of-living differences.

#### (c) Sense of Congress

It is the sense of Congress that—

(1) the Bureau of the Census should conduct a study to determine the feasibility of expanding data collection to include Puerto Rico and the other United States territories in the Current Population Survey, which is jointly administered by the Bureau of the Census and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and which is the primary source of labor force statistics for the population of the United States; and

(2) if necessary, the Bureau of the Census should request the funding required to conduct this feasibility study as part of its budget submission to Congress for fiscal year 2018.

(Pub. L. 114–187, title IV, §404, June 30, 2016, 130 Stat. 586.)
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 07/24 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 24 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
#### § 1218.300 Payment of royalties, rentals, and deferred bonuses.

As specified under the provisions of the lease, the lessee shall submit all rental and deferred bonus payments when due and shall pay in value all royalties in the amount determined by ONRR to be due.

[52 FR 23815, June 25, 1987]
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-1244

___________

Shawna Carr, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

Lake Village Police Department; * District of Arkansas.

Percy Wilburn, Individually and *

in his Official Capacity as Chief * [UNPUBLISHED]

of Police for the City of Lake *

Village; Jacqueline Brown, Sergeant, *

Individually and in her Official *

Capacity as an Employee of the *

City of Lake Village Police *

Department; City of Lake Village; *

Joanne Bush, Mayor, Individually *

and in her Official Capacity as Mayor *

of the City of Lake Village, Arkansas *

(originally sued as Jo Ann Bush), *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: October 10, 2005

Filed: November 7, 2005

___________

Before ARNOLD, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________
1

The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas.

-2-

PER CURIAM.

 Shawna Carr appeals from the summary judgment that the district court1

entered against her in her action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Ms. Carr had claimed that

the defendants had violated her right to the equal protection of the law and had

deprived her of her property without the due process of law, all as guaranteed by the

fourteenth amendment. The district court ruled that although the defendant police

officers acted under color of law when they seized Ms. Carr's automobile, they were

nevertheless not liable because Ms. Carr had a post-deprivation remedy for any loss

of property, see Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 541-43 (1981), overruled on other

grounds, Daniels v. Williams, 474 U.S. 327, 330-31 (1986), and because there was no

evidence that in seizing the car the defendants failed to treat similarly-situated people

alike, see Klinger v. Department of Corrections, 31 F.3d 727, 731 (8th Cir. 1994),

cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1185 (1995).

We agree with the district court's conclusions and, having nothing to add to its

well-reasoned opinion, we affirm the judgment.

______________________________
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of CB Richard Ellis Realty Trust (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jack A. Cuneo, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company. 

 

April 2, 2007
Exhibit 31
                                  ----------


                                 CERTIFICATION

        I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

        1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
        Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in
        respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report,
        of CWALT, Inc., Alternative Loan Trust 2004-15;

        2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
        whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
        omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
        in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
        not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
        report;

        3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
        required to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under
        the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in
        these reports is included in these reports;

        4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
        master servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement
        and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required
        under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the
        master servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;
        and

        5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
        master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards
        based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
        after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single
        Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set
        forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is
        included in these reports.

        In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
        information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
        Bank of New York, as Trustee.

        Date: March 29, 2005

                                  /s/ Steve Bailey
                                  -----------------
                                  Steve Bailey
                                  Senior Managing Director
§ 990.295 Resident Management Corporation operating subsidy. ( a ) *General.* This part applies to all projects managed by a Resident Management Corporation (RMC), including a direct funded RMC.
( b ) *Operating subsidy.* Subject to paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section, the amount of operating subsidy that a PHA or HUD provides a project managed by an RMC shall not be reduced during the three-year period beginning on the date the RMC first assumes management responsibility for the project.
( c ) *Change factors.* The operating subsidy for an RMC-managed project shall reflect changes in inflation, utility rates, and consumption, as well as changes in the number of units in the resident managed project.
( d ) *Exclusion of increased income.* Any increased income directly generated by activities by the RMC or facilities operated by the RMC shall be excluded from the calculation of the operating subsidy.
( e ) *Exclusion of technical assistance.* Any technical assistance the PHA provides to the RMC will not be included for purposes of determining the amount of funds provided to a project under paragraph (b) of this section.
( f ) The following conditions may not affect the amounts to be provided under this part to a project managed by an RMC: ( 1 ) *Income reduction.* Any reduction in the subsidy or total income of a PHA that occurs as a result of fraud, waste, or mismanagement by the PHA; and
( 2 ) *Change in total income.* Any change in the total income of a PHA that occurs as a result of project-specific characteristics when these characteristics are not shared by the project managed by the RMC.
( g ) *Other project income.* In addition to the operating subsidy calculated in accordance with this part and the amount of income derived from the project (from sources such as rents and charges), the management contract between the PHA and the RMC may specify that income be provided to the project from other legally available sources of PHA income.
#### Richard Schulman, Appellant, *v.*Security National Bank, Respondent.

Motion by respondent to dismiss appeal from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County, entered October 3, 1962, which denied appellant’s motion for summary judgment and granted respondent’s motion for such relief. Motion denied. On the court’s own motion, appeal transferred to the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, Second Judicial Department, which is now vested with the jurisdiction to determine this appeal (see order of this court No. 47, dated July 12, 1962; N. Y. Const., art. YI, § 5, subd. b; § 8, subd. d). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
§ 964.305 Eligibility. ( a ) *Public Housing Authorities.* HAs may apply to establish one or more FICs for more than one public housing development.
( b ) *FIC Activities.* Activities that may be funded and carried out by eligible HAs, as defined in § 964.305(a) and § 964.310(a) may include: ( 1 ) The renovation, conversion, or combination of vacant dwelling units in a HA development to create common areas to accommodate the provision of supportive services;
( 2 ) The renovation of existing common areas in a HA development to accommodate the provision of supportive services;
( 3 ) The acquisition, construction or renovation of facilities located near the premises of one or more HA developments to accommodate the provision of supportive services;
( 4 ) The provision of not more than 15 percent of the total cost of supportive services (which may be provided directly to eligible residents by the HA or by contract or lease through other appropriate agencies or providers), but only if the HA demonstrates that: ( i ) The supportive services are appropriate to improve the access of eligible residents to employment and educational opportunities; and
( ii ) The HA has made diligent efforts to use or obtain other available resources to fund or provide such services; and
( 5 ) The employment of service coordinators.
( c ) *Follow up.* A HA must demonstrate a firm commitment of assistance from one or more sources ensuring that supportive services will be provided for not less than one year following the completion of activities.
( d ) *Environmental Review.* Any environmental impact regarding eligible activities will be addressed through an environmental review of that activity as required by 24 CFR part 50, including the applicable related laws and authorities under § 50.4, to be completed by HUD, to ensure that any environmental impact will be addressed before assistance is provided to the HA. Grantees will be expected to adhere to all assurances applicable to environmental concerns.
### §§1405d to 1405g. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–357, title III, §307, Oct. 19, 1982, 96 Stat. 1709

Section 1405d, act June 22, 1936, ch. 699, §5, 49 Stat. 1808, related to composition, election, and legislative powers of Municipal Council of Saint Croix.

Section 1405e, act June 22, 1936, ch. 699, §6, 49 Stat. 1808, related to composition, election, and legislative powers of Municipal Council of Saint Thomas and Saint John.

Section 1405f, act June 22, 1936, ch. 699, §7, 49 Stat. 1808, related to composition, meetings, and powers of two municipal councils to be known as the Legislative Assembly of the Virgin Islands.

Section 1405g, act June 22, 1936, ch. 699, §8, 49 Stat. 1809, related to time of holding elections.
#### § 27.37 Tests to determine adequacy of safety devices for bulbs.

The glass envelope of bulbs with the filament incandescent at normal operating voltage shall be broken in flammable methane-air or natural gas-air mixtures in a gallery to determine that the safety device will prevent ignition of the flammable mixtures.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-21-00066-CV

__________________

IN RE GERALD B. WILSON

__________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding

435th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 07-02-02127-CV

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In a petition for a writ of mandamus, Gerald B. Wilson argues the trial court 

abused its discretion by failing to rule on two pro se motions that Wilson filed while 

he was represented by State Counsel for Offenders as statutorily appointed counsel

in a sexually violent predator civil commitment proceeding. See generally Tex. 

Health & Safety Code Ann. § 841.005(a). Wilson contends that he wants to represent 

himself in his next biennial review proceeding. See generally Tex. Health & Safety 

Code Ann. § 841.102. Wilson argues that the trial court has a ministerial duty to rule 

on his pro se motions.
2

A trial court does not have a ministerial duty to rule on pro se motions filed 

by a person who is represented by counsel in the case. See In re S.V., 599 S.W.3d 

25, 44 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2017, pet. denied) (op. on reh’g); In re Stanley, No. 09-

15-00204-CV, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 6793, at *1 (Tex. App.—Beaumont July 2, 

2015, orig. proceeding) (per curiam). We deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). 

PETITION DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on April 21, 2021

Opinion Delivered April 22, 2021

Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
Exhibit 10.1


 


TERMINATION AGREEMENT


 


This TERMINATION
AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”), dated November 18, 2022 (the “Effective Date”), made by and between Osiris,
LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (“Seller”) and Michael Gurtman (“Owner”), on the one hand,
and Bespoke Extracts Colorado, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (“Buyer”) and Bespoke Extracts, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (“Parent”) on the other hand. Seller, Owner, Buyer, and Parent are sometimes referred to individually as
a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”


 


WHEREAS,
the Parties entered into an asset purchase agreement dated August 11, 2022 (the “Purchase Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS,
the Parties would like to terminate the Purchase Agreement, effective as of the date hereof;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby agree as follows:


 


1.
Termination. The Purchase Agreement and any and all obligations of any party arising from the Purchase Agreement, shall,
in all respects, be deemed to be null and void and of no further force and effect as of the Effective Date. Furthermore, on and after
the Effective Date, no party to the Purchase Agreement shall have any further obligations of any nature whatsoever with respect to any
other Party pursuant to or arising from the Purchase Agreement.


 


2.
Entire Agreement. This Termination Agreement contain the entire understanding of the parties with respect to the subject
matter hereof and supersede all prior agreements and understandings, oral or written, with respect to such matters.


 


3.
Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their successors
and permitted assigns.


 


4.
Execution. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, all of which when taken together shall be considered
one and the same agreement and shall become effective when counterparts have been signed by each party and delivered to the other party.


 


[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK]


 




     


     

    


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties
hereto have duly executed and delivered this Agreement as of the date first above written.


 


	OSIRIS, LLC	 
	 	 
	By: 	/s/ Michael Gurtman	 
	Name: 	Michael Gurtman	 
	Title:	 	 
	 	 
	BESPOKE EXTRACTS COLORADO, LLC	 
	 	 
	By: 	/s/ Michael Feinsod	 
	Name:	Michael Feinsod	 
	Title:	 	 
		 
	BESPOKE EXTRACTS, INC.	 
	 	 
	By: 	/s/ Michael Feinsod	 
	Name:	 Michael Feinsod	 
	Title:	 	 
	 	 
	/s/ Michael Gurtman	 
	Michael Gurtman
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

JACOB LEE MUSIC , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 404

[ September 6 , 2017 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; James W. McCann

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 56

- 2014

- CF

- 001992A

.

Jacob Lee Music

, DeF uniak Springs , pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

G ERBER , C.J., D AMOORGIAN and C ONNER , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the “Report”) of Digital EcosystemsCorp. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, the undersigned Carmen J. Lotito,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of theundersigned’s knowledge and belief:     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.Dated: July 14, 2006             /s/ Carmen J. Lotito         Carmen J. Lotito, Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of NeoMedia  Technologies,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The  information  contained in the
Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operation of the Company.

Date: May 19, 2004                            By: /s/ David A. Dodge
     -------------                                ------------------------------
                                                  Name: David A. Dodge
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to NeoMedia  Technologies,
Inc. and will be retained by NeoMedia  Technologies,  Inc. and  furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph Gallo, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction of defendant of the crime of conspiracy to commit the crime of extortion in violation of section 580-a of the Penal Law and of an attempt to commit the crime of extortion, unanimotisly affirmed. The imposition of separate sentences thereon to run consecutively was proper and did. not constitute double punishment within the prohibition of section 1938 of the Penal Law. (iSee Penal Law, §§ 2, 580-a, 850, 851; *People ex rel. Maurer*v. *Jackson,*2 N Y 2d 259; *People*v. *Erickson,*302 N. Y. 461; *United States*v. *Bayer,*331 U. S. 532, 542; *Brown*v. *United States,*167 F. 2d 772.) -Concur — Breitel, J. P., McNally, Eager, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.