alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### (A) Dorothy Lieberman, Appellant, v. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp. et al., Respondents. (B) Ethel Smith, Appellant, v. City of Corning, Respondent. (C) Ethel Smith, Appellant, v. City of Corning, Defendant, and John Bonady et al., as Executors, et al., Respondents.

[In each action] Order of dismissal for failure to prosecute entered pursuant to rule X of the Rules of the Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
### §57304. Eligible acquisition dates

At the option of the owner, the acquisition of an obsolete vessel under this chapter shall occur—

(1) when the owner contracts for the construction or purchase of a new vessel; or

(2) within 5 days of the actual date of delivery of the new vessel to the owner.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1662.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 57304 | 46 App.:1160(b) (2d sentence). | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title V, §510(b) (2d sentence), as added Aug. 4, 1939, ch. 417, §7, 53 Stat. 1184; Pub. L. 87–401, subdiv. (1), Oct. 5, 1961, 75 Stat. 833; Pub. L. 91–469, §35(a), Oct. 21, 1970, 84 Stat. 1035; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(91), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 161. |

Section

The words "At the option of the owner" are substituted for "if the owner so requests" for clarity.
### Attachment **D : A**  **ffidavits of Nondisclosure**

This appendix includes Affidavits of Nondisclosure for Education Northwest researchers Caitlin Scott, Diane Couture, and Nora Lasley. Before final submission to OMB we will add affidavits for Leslie Anderson, managing d irector at P olicy Studies Associates (PSA), and other PSA staff members assigned to this project, as appropriate.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 07587

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

07587\07587_ Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 07587\07587_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

x 07587\07587_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07587\07587_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07587\07587_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07587\07587_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07587\07587_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

07587\Supporting Documents\07587_Midwest Generation ICR Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07587\Supporting Documents\07587_MWG - Powerton - Aerial Plan-1 - 091610.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07587\Supporting Documents\07587_MWG - Powerton - Aerial Plan-2 - 091610.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07587\Supporting Documents\07587_MWG-Powerton-Block Diagram#1 -POND-1 - 101210.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07587\Supporting Documents\07587_MWG-Powerton-Block Diagram#2 - WWT-1 - 101210.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07587\Supporting Documents\07587_MWG-Powerton-Block Diagram#3 -POND-2 - 101210.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07587\Supporting Documents\07587_MWG-Powerton-Water Balance-101210.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
Stuart S. MacPherson 

P.O. Box 807 

Cardiff, Ca. 92007 

•PA \m OF 

:A'€PORTATiON 

•'•FT OPERATIONS 

'MM2 U D |:5i , ^--i-^^U^w ^ 

FAA Docket No. CPl 0WP0006 

DMS NO. FAA-2010-0538 

-ff.i.'^ ^ii. rThe Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearing, M-20 

U.S. Dept of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Judge Goodwin, 

This letter shall express my wish to withdraw my request for a hearing in the Docket No. 

CP10WP0006. Laura Ponto and I have arrived at a settlement agreement in this matter. 

Thank you for your consideration in originally granting, and now rescinding my request 

for this hearing. 

'MacPherson 

iuaryl2,2011
|     |                                                                                                                                 |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1) | The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|     |                                                                                                                                                                   |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |

|                   |
|-------------------|
|                   |  |  |  |  |  |
|              |   |   | CRI HOTEL INCOME PARTNERS, L.P. |
|              |   |   |   |
|              |   |   |   |
|              |   |   | by: |   | CRICO Hotel Associates L.L.P |
|              |   |   | its General Partner |
|              |   |   |   |
|              |   |   | by: |   | C.R.I., Inc. |
|              |   |   |   |   | Managing General Partner |
|              |   |   |   |   |   |
| November 27, 2013 |   |   | by: |   |  /s/ William B. Dockser |
| DATE              |   |   |   |   | William B. Dockser, |
|              |   |   |   |   | Director, Chairman of the Board |
|              |   |   |   |   | and Treasurer |
|              |   |   |   |   | Principal Executive Officer |
|              |   |   |   |   |   |
| November 27, 2013 |   |   | by: |   | /s/ H. William Willoughby |
| DATE              |   |   |   |   | H. William Willoughby, |
|              |   |   |   |   | Director, President, Secretary, |
|              |   |   |   |   | Principal Financial Officer and |
|              |   |   |   |   | Principal Accounting Officer |
#### CROSS v. CURRAN et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November 17, 1903.)

Action by Alfred F. Cross against Francis Curran and another.

No opinion. Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs, and motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 Certification
I, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered bythis annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2004-27;
1.  Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; 2.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports; 3.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and 4.  The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.
In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.
Date: March 29, 2005        By:  /s/ Ellen Z. Lamale   Name:  Ellen Z. Lamale   Title:  Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Barnett Kramer, Respondent, v Saluda Knitting Mills, Inc., et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed September 17, 1976. The board found: “employer-employee relationship, jurisdiction in New York State, and that the claimant sustained an occupational bronchitis, causally related to his employment”. The decision is supported by substantial evidence and the appellants have not demonstrated that the board acted arbitrarily in refusing to restore the case to the referee calendar for further evidence. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier. Greenblott, J. P., Main, Larkin, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Frances D. Gannon v. Morris A. Jacobs, as Commissioner of Hospitals of the City of New York.

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person denied without prejudice, however, to a renewal thereof upon a proper affidavit of merits. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.
§ 908.108 Cost. ( a ) *General.* The costs of the electronic transmission of the correctly formatted data, including either the purchase and maintenance of computer hardware or software, or both, the cost of contracting for those services, or the cost of centralizing the electronic transmission function, shall be considered Section 8 Administrative expenses, or eligible public and Indian housing operating expenses that can be included in the public and Indian housing operating budget. At the HA's option, the cost of the computer software may include service contracts to provide maintenance or training, or both.
( b ) *Sources of funding.* For public and Indian housing, costs may be covered from operating subsidy for which the HA is already eligible, or the initial cost may be covered by funds received by the HA under HUD's Comprehensive Improvement Assistance Program (CIAP) or Comprehensive Grant Program (CGP). For Section 8 programs, the costs may be covered from ongoing administrative fees or the Section 8 operating reserve.
**EXHIBIT 21.1****SUBSIDIARIES OF AMERICAN CASINO & ENTERTAINMENT PROPERTIES LLC**Set forth below is a list of subsidiaries of American Casino & Entertainment Properties LLC. Eachof the listed subsidiaries is directly or indirectly wholly-owned by American Casino &Entertainment Properties LLC. All other subsidiaries, in the aggregate, are not significant.   **Name** **State of Incorporation**American Casino & Entertainment Properties Finance Corp. DelawareStratosphere Corporation DelawareStratosphere Gaming Corp. NevadaArizona Charlie’s, LLC NevadaFresca, LLC NevadaCharlie’s Holding LLC DelawareStratosphere Land Corporation NevadaStratosphere Leasing, LLC DelawareAREP Laughlin Corporation Delaware
### SUBCHAPTER III—NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS DELEGATE
### §793. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–473, §4(b), Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1466; Pub. L. 97–449, §4(b)(2), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2441, eff. Oct. 17, 1978

Section, Pub. L. 93–236, title VI, §603, Jan. 2, 1974, 87 Stat. 1023, related to freight rates for recyclables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Investigation of Discriminatory Freight Rates for Transportation of Recyclable or Recycled Materials

Pub. L. 94–210, title II, §204, Feb. 5, 1976, 90 Stat. 40, which provided for an investigation by the Interstate Commerce Commission of discriminatory freight rates for transportation of recyclable or recycled materials, was repealed by Pub. L. 95–473, §4(b), Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1466.
§ 1243.100 What standards must my ONRR-specified surety instrument meet? ( a ) An ONRR-specified surety instrument must be in a form specified in ONRR instructions. ONRR will give you written information and standard forms for ONRR-specified surety instrument requirements.
( b ) ONRR will use a bank-rating service to determine whether a financial institution has an acceptable rating to provide a surety instrument adequate to indemnify the lessor from loss or damage. ( 1 ) Administrative appeal bonds must be issued by a qualified surety company which the Department of the Treasury has approved.
( 2 ) Irrevocable letters of credit or certificates of deposit must be from a financial institution acceptable to ONRR with a minimum 1-year period of coverage subject to automatic renewal up to 5 years.
Editorial Note on Part 1206
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1206 (formerly part 206) appear at 67 FR 19111, Apr. 18, 2002.

§ 1206.55 What are my responsibilities to place production into marketable condition and to market production? ( a ) You must place oil in marketable condition and market the oil for the mutual benefit of the lessee and the lessor at no cost to the Indian lessor unless the lease agreement provides otherwise.
( b ) If you must use gross proceeds under an arm's-length contract or your affiliate's gross proceeds under an arm's-length exchange agreement to determine value under § 1206.52 or § 1206.53, you must increase those gross proceeds to the extent that the purchaser, or any other person, provides certain services that the seller normally would be responsible to perform in order to place the oil in marketable condition or to market the oil.
§ 19.6 Specific requirements for approval. ( a ) *Design.* In the determination of the adequacy of the lamp, with respect to design, the following points will be considered: ( 1 ) The materials used;
( 2 ) construction;
( 3 ) weight;
( 4 ) amount of light;
( 5 ) distribution of light; and
( 6 ) exclusion of dust from the headpiece. The suitability of the materials and the construction shall be determined by preliminary inspection, by dropping tests,[1] by durability tests of the cord and cord armor,[2] and by the general behavior of the lamp equipment during the investigation. The amount and distribution of the light shall be judged both by observation of the illumination on a white screen and by photometric measurements.
( b ) *Angle of light beam.* MSHA recommends that the angle of the light beam be at least 130 degrees horizontally to insure that the contrast edge of the beam is away from the more sensitive sector of the wearer's vision; however, to allow for manufacturing and assembly tolerances and the use of multiple filament bulbs, MSHA will approve lamps giving a minimum beam angle of 120 degrees. If the bulb has more than one major filament, the one giving the smaller angle will be used in the determination.
( c ) *Light distribution, visual.* Excepting special headpieces for inspection purposes, the area illuminated by the beam shall be free from sharp gradations in light intensity and spectral shadows.
( d ) *Light distribution, photometric.* ( 1 ) Excepting special headpieces for inspection purposes, the maximum candlepower of the light beam shall not be greater than 25 times the average or mean candlepower of the beam.[3]
( 2 ) The minimum candlepower of the beam based upon readings at the design voltage of the bulb shall not be less than 1.
Footnotes -
19.6
[1] Batteries are dropped 3 feet, at least 20 times onto an oak floor. Headpieces are dropped 6 feet, at least 20 times, onto concrete.
[2] Ten cords, assembled with the cord armor and outlet of the lamp with which it is to be used, are slatted at least 100,000 times through an arc of 50 degrees at approximately 90 slattings per minute.
[3] The minimum allowable angle of 120 degrees will be used in determining the mean candlepower of the beam.
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
| 3.1    |   | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Navistar International Corporation effective July 1, 1993. Filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 1993, which was dated and filed on January 27, 1994, and amended as of May 4, 1998. Commission File No. 001-9618. |
|   |   |
| 3.2    |   | Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation, filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware effective February 17, 2011. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K, which was dated and filed on February 17, 2011. Commission File No. 001-09618. |
|   |   |
| 3.3    |   | Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation, filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware effective February 21, 2012. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K, which was dated and filed on February 21, 2012. Commission File No. 001-09618. |
|   |   |
| 3.4    |   | Certificate of Retirement of Class B Common Stock of Navistar International Corporation, effective April 19, 2013. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K, which was dated and filed on April 22, 2013. Commission File No. 001-09618. |
|   |   |
| 3.5    |   | Third Amended and Restated By-Laws of Navistar International Corporation effective October 5, 2012. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K, which was dated and filed on October 10, 2012. Commission File No. 001-09618. |
|   |   |
| 3.7    |   | Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Junior Participating Preferred Stock, Series A filed with the Secretary of State for the State of Delaware on June 20, 2012 establishing the Series A Preferred Stock of Navistar International Corporation in accordance with the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Navistar International Corporation. Filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K which was dated and filed on June 20, 2012. Commission File No. 001-09618. |
### §1735. Operation of Office; compensation, allowances, and benefits; privileges and immunities

Until the Rules of the House of Representatives are amended to provide otherwise, the Delegate from American Samoa shall receive the same compensation, allowances, and benefits as a Member of the House of Representatives, and shall be entitled to whatever privileges and immunities that are, or hereinafter may be, granted to the nonvoting Delegate from the Territory of Guam.

(Pub. L. 95–556, §5, Oct. 31, 1978, 92 Stat. 2078; Pub. L. 97–357, title IV, §401, Oct. 19, 1982, 96 Stat. 1711.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1982—Pub. L. 97–357 struck out proviso limiting clerk hire allowance for Delegate from American Samoa to 50 per centum of clerk hire allowance of a Member of House of Representatives.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

Pub. L. 97–357, title IV, §401, Oct. 19, 1982, 96 Stat. 1711, provided that the amendment made by section 401 is effective Jan. 1, 1983.
TABLE OF CONTENTS     ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS  3      ARTICLE 2. THE GRANT AND EXERCISE OF PURCHASE OPTION  4      ARTICLE 3. EXERCISE PRICE  4      ARTICLE 4. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES  5      ARTICLE 5. OTHER COVENANTS  5      ARTICLE 6. CONFIDENTIALITY  6      ARTICLE 7. APPLICABLE LAW AND EVENTS OF DEFAULT  6      ARTICLE 8. DISPUTE RESOLUTION  6      ARTICLE 9. EFFECTIVENESS AND TERM  7      ARTICLE 10. AMENDMENT  7      ARTICLE 11. COUNTERPARTS  7      ARTICLE 12. MISCELLANEOUS 7      EXHIBIT 1 PROXY  8      EXHIBIT 1 PROXY  9 
 
2

 
PURCHASE OPTION AGREEMENTThis Purchase Option Agreement (“this Agreement”) is entered into in Beijing, People’s Republic ofChina (the “PRC”) on October 15th , 2009 by and among:Party A: Fortune Software (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
Exhibit 13.2




CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of China Finance Online Co. Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeff Wang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: April 29, 2013
 By:
/s/ Jeff WangName:  Jeff WangTitle: Chief Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 1218.154 Effect of suspensions on royalty and rental. ( a ) ONRR will not relieve the lessee of the obligation to pay rental or minimum royalty for or during the suspension if the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) Regional Supervisor: ( 1 ) Grants a suspension of operations or production, or both, at the request of the lessee; or
( 2 ) Directs a suspension of operations or production, or both, under 30 CFR 250.173(a).
( b ) ONRR will not require a lessee to pay rental or minimum royalty for or during the suspension if the BSEE Regional Supervisor directs a suspension of operations or production, or both, except as provided in (a)(2) of this section.
( c ) If the lease anniversary date falls within a period of suspension for which no rental or minimum royalty payments are required under paragraph (b) of this section, the prorated rentals or minimum royalties are due and payable as of the date the suspension period terminates. These amounts shall be computed and notice thereof given the lessee. The lessee shall pay the amount due within 30 days after receipt of such notice. The anniversary date of a lease shall not change by reason of any period of lease suspension or rental or royalty relief resulting therefrom.
[44 FR 38276, June 29, 1979; 44 FR 55380, Sept. 26, 1979. Redesignated and amended at 47 FR 47006, 47007, Oct. 22, 1982. Further redesignated at 48 FR 35641, Aug. 5, 1983 and amended at 51 FR 19063, May 27, 1986; 54 FR 50616, Dec. 8, 1989; 64 FR 72775, Dec. 28, 1999; 73 FR 15898, Mar. 26, 2008; 76 FR 38561, July 1, 2011; 78 FR 30206, May 22, 2013]
### SUBCHAPTER III—FREIGHT FORWARDER SERVICE
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1157 How do I receive approval to produce gas-cap gas from an oil reservoir with an associated gas cap? ( a ) You must request and receive approval from the Regional Supervisor: ( 1 ) Before producing gas-cap gas from each completion in an oil reservoir that is known to have an associated gas cap.
( 2 ) To continue production from a well if the oil reservoir is not initially known to have an associated gas cap, but the oil well begins to show characteristics of a gas well.
( b ) For either request, you must submit the service fee listed in § 250.125, according to the instructions in § 250.126, and the supporting information, as listed in the table in § 250.1167, with your request.
( c ) The Regional Supervisor will determine whether your request maximizes ultimate recovery.