alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,357,240
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         449,577
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 67,156,732
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    130,981,254
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,323,981
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             215,431,121
<DEPOSITS>                                 192,843,136
<SHORT-TERM>                                 3,390,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,927,111
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,921
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,252,953
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             215,431,121
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,776,782
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,773,618
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               276,520
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,826,920
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,451,557
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              95,961
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,547,518
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  247,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (93)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,536,896
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,276,856
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     796,929
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   796,929
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.44
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.65
<LOANS-NON>                                    933,658
<LOANS-PAST>                                 2,850,156
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,200,586
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  162,959
<RECOVERIES>                                    39,354
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,323,981
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### GLENS FALLS NAT. BANK, Appellant, v. VAN NOSTRAND, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

March 8, 1905.)

Action by the Glens Falls National Bank against Jane C. Van Nostrand. No opinion. Judgment (85 N. Y. Supp. 50) unanimously affirmed, with costs.
```

[114th Congress Public Law 293]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 130 STAT. 1503]]

Public Law 114-293
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
       To direct the Administrator of the Transportation Security 
 Administration to notify air carriers and security screening personnel 
 of the Transportation Security Administration of such Administration's 
  guidelines regarding permitting baby formula, breast milk, purified 
         deionized water, and juice on airplanes, and for other 
            purposes. <<NOTE: Dec. 16, 2016 -  [H.R. 5065]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Bottles and 
Breastfeeding Equipment Screening Act. 49 USC 44901 note.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bottles and Breastfeeding Equipment 
Screening Act''.
SEC. 2. <<NOTE: Deadline.>>  TSA SECURITY SCREENING GUIDELINES FOR 
                    BABY FORMULA, BREAST MILK, PURIFIED DEIONIZED 
                    WATER FOR INFANTS, AND JUICE ON AIRPLANES; 
                    TRAINING ON SPECIAL PROCEDURES.

    Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration shall--
            (1) notify air carriers and security screening personnel of 
        the Transportation Security Administration and personnel of 
        private security companies providing security screening pursuant 
        to section 44920 of title 49, United States Code, of such 
        Administration's guidelines regarding permitting baby formula, 
        breast milk, purified deionized water for infants, and juice on 
        airplanes under the Administration's guidelines known as the 3-
        1-1 Liquids Rule Exemption; and
            (2) in training procedures for security screening personnel 
        of the Administration and private security companies providing 
        security screening pursuant to section 44920 of title 49, United 
        States Code, include training on special screening procedures.

    Approved December 16, 2016.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5065:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 114-775 (Comm. on Homeland Security).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016):
            Sept. 27, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 9, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, John H. Karnes, certify that:     (1) I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Mariner Energy, Inc.;     (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     (4) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have:     a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     (5) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):     a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:November 9, 2006              /s/ John H. Karnes   John H. Karnes,   Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
CONFIDENTIAL
 Exhibit 10.164


*** Confidential Portion has been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment by the Company to, and the material has been separately filed with, the SEC. Each omitted Confidential Portion is marked by three Asterisks.





FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE FULL-TIME-TRANSPONDER CAPACITY AGREEMENT (PRE-LAUNCH)








This Fourth Amendment to the Full-Time Transponder Capacity Agreement (Pre-Launch) (the “First Amendment”) is made and entered into as of this 4th day of June, 2008 by and between INTELSAT CORPORATION, formerly known as PanAmSat Corporation, a Delaware corporation
(“Intelsat”), and GCI COMMUNICATION CORP., an Alaskan corporation (“Customer”).





RECITALS





WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Full-Time Transponder Capacity Agreement (Pre-Launch) dated as of March 31, 2006, as amended on February 15, 2008, April 9, 2008, and June 4, 2008 (collectively, the “Agreement”) between Intelsat and Customer, Intelsat is providing
Customer with *** (***) *** transponders and up to *** (***) *** transponders on Galaxy 18, and *** (***) *** transponder, *** (***) *** transponder on Horizons 1, and an additional *** (***) *** Transponder Segment on Horizons 1;





WHEREAS, Customer and Intelsat wish to amend the terms of the Agreement to exercise Customer’s *** Transponder, as defined in the Agreement;





AGREEMENT





NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the sufficiency and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:





1.
Except as specifically provided herein, all terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.





2.
*** Transponder.  Intelsat agrees to provide to Customer and Customer agrees to accept from Intelsat *** (***) *** Transponder (the “*** Transponder”) meeting the performance specifications set forth in Appendix B attached hereto.





3.
Capacity Term.  The Capacity Term for the *** Transponder Capacity shall commence on ***, *** and continue until the later of (a) 23:59 Greenwich Mean Time on the date that is *** (***) *** (***) ***, or (***) *** (***) ***.





4.
Monthly Fee.  The Monthly Fee for the *** Transponder Capacity shall be US$***,*** per month.





5.
Except as specifically set forth in this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the amendment remain in full force and effect.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has duly executed and delivered this Third Amendment as of the day and year above written.








INTELSAT CORPORATION                                                                                                                     
       GCI COMMUNICATION CORP.








/s/ Patricia Casey


/s/ Jimmy R. SipesName: Patricia Casey


Name: Jimmy R. SipesTitle: Senior VP and Deputy General Counsel


Title: VP Network Services and Chief Engineer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 28, 2016

No. 04-15-00729-CV

CITY OF RIO GRANDE CITY, TEXAS, and Joel Villarreal, Herman R. Garza III, Arcadio J. 

Salinas III, Rey Ramirez, and Dave Jones in their Official Capacities,

Appellants

v.

BFI WASTE SERVICES OF TEXAS, LP d/b/a Allied Waste Services of Rio Grande Valley,

Appellees

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-15-604

Honorable Migdalia Lopez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On June 27, 2016, Appellants filed an amended motion to strike Appellee’s supplemental 

brief. Appellants further requested an additional 9,629 words with which to respond and an 

extension of time in which to file their reply brief. Appellants’ amended motion to strike and 

request for an additional 9,629 words with which to respond are DENIED. Appellants’ request 

for an extension of time in which to file their reply brief is GRANTED. It is therefore 

ORDERED Appellant’s reply brief is due July 11, 2016.

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of June, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive
        - Federal Maritime Commission

#  Federal Maritime Commission 

**Collected by:** Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive 

**Archived since:**Oct, 2014

**Description:**
The Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) is an independent federal agency, based in Washington, D.C., responsible for the regulation of the U.S. international ocean transportation system.  The FMC Web site answers an extensive amount of questions regarding ocean transportation, tariffs, service contracts and other maritime issues.   The site also features an Electronic Reading Room and Services such as a Docket Activity Library and Cruise Passenger Assistance.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal,     	    Economics & Finance,     	    International Relations

**Creator:**    	    Federal Maritime Commission

**Language:**    	    English

**Collector:**    	    U.S. Government Publishing Office

## Narrow Your Results

### 

            There are no further ways to narrow your results.           

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear

              - Sites
              - Search Page Text

Page 1 of 1  (4 Total Results)

**Sort By:**
                - Title (A-Z)
                - Title (Z-A)
                - URL (A-Z)
                - URL (Z-A)

### URL:     https://servcon.fmc.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://twitter.com/FMC_gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.fmc.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwKTAlGGHIA0xcN3bDt_Uqg/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

Page 1 of 1  (4 Total Results)

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  The Board
of Directors
 James
River Coal Company:
  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-143563) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-126860 and 333-161123) on Form S-8 of
James River Coal Company of our report dated February 25, 2010, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of James River Coal Company and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity
and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows, for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which report
appears in the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of James River
Coal Company.
   /s/ 
KPMG LLP
  Richmond,
Virginia
 February
25, 2010
#### § 1218.304 May I credit rental towards direct use fees?

You may not credit annual rental toward direct use fees you are required to pay that year under § 1206.356 of this chapter. You must pay the direct use fees in addition to the annual rental due.

[72 FR 24468, May 2, 2007]
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IMPSAT Fiber Networks, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the
Report) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Ricardo Verdaguer, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by
the Chief Executive Officer of the Company with the requirements of Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be disclosed, distributed or
used by any person or for any reason other than as specifically required by
law.

|                  |  |                                                                                
|----------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|November 14, 2002 |  | /s/ RICARDO VERDAGUERRicardo A. Verdaguer
President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 1210.152 What reports must I submit to claim allowances on an Indian lease? ( a ) *General.* You must submit three additional forms to ONRR to claim transportation or processing allowances on Indian oil and gas leases: ( 1 ) You must submit Form ONRR-4110, Oil Transportation Allowance Report, to claim an allowance for expenses incurred by a reporter/payor to transport oil from the lease site to a point remote from the lease where value is determined under § 1206.55 of this chapter.
( 2 ) You must submit Form ONRR-4109, Gas Processing Allowance Summary Report, to claim an allowance for the reasonable, actual costs of removing hydrocarbon and nonhydrocarbon elements or compounds from a gas stream under § 1206.180 of this chapter.
( 3 ) You must submit Form ONRR-4295, Gas Transportation Allowance Report, to claim an allowance for the reasonable, actual costs of transporting gas from the lease to the point of first sale under § 1206.178 of this chapter.
( b ) *Reporting options.* You must submit Forms ONRR-4110, ONRR-4109, and ONRR-4295 manually. You may find the forms at *http://www.onrr.gov/FM/Forms/AFSOil_Gas.htm* or from contacts listed on that Web page.
( c ) *Reporting address.* You may submit completed Forms ONRR-4110, ONRR-4109, and ONRR-4295 by: ( 1 ) U.S. Postal Service regular or express mail addressed to Office of Natural Resources Revenue, P.O. Box 25165, MS 634000B, Denver, CO 80225-0165;
( 2 ) Special courier or overnight mail addressed to Office of Natural Resources Revenue, Building 85, Room A322, Denver Federal Center, West 6th Ave. and Kipling Blvd., Denver, Colorado 80225; or
( 3 ) Complete and submit the form electronically as an email attachment to *onrrindianforms@onrr.gov .*
[48 FR 35641, Aug. 5, 1983, as amended at 76 FR 76615, Dec. 8, 2011; 77 FR 25879, 25880, May 2, 2012; 87 FR 21745, Apr. 13, 2022]
##### 



Exhibit 10.3
 MARINER ENERGY, INC.
 
   Fee perService
    
    PeriodFee Description
    
    ($)
    
    CoveredNon-employee director
    
    
    60,000
    
    
    AnnualChairman of audit committee
    
    
    20,000
    
    
    AnnualChairman of compensation committee
    
    
    15,000
    
    
    AnnualChairman of committee other than audit and
compensation committees
    
    
    10,000
    
    
    AnnualBoard meeting (attendance in person or by phone)
    
    
    2,000
    
    
    Per meetingCommittee meeting (attendance in person or by
phone)
    
    
    1,500
    
    
    Per meeting
### Organic Chemical Concentrations and Reproductive Biomarkers in Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio) Collected from Two Areas in Lake Mead, Nevada, May 1999-May 2000

By: Steven L. GoodbredThomas J. LeikerReynaldo PatiñoJill A. Jenkins**Nancy D. DenslowErik OrsakMichael R. Rosen**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds286

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area
Exhibit
99.1

Report on Financial Statement Schedule of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board
of Directors and Shareholder Celanese Holdings LLC

Under
date of March 30, 2006, we reported on the consolidated balance sheets
of Celanese Holdings LLC and subsidiaries
("Successor") as of December 31, 2005 and
2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholder's equity, and cash flows for the year ended December
31, 2005 and the nine-month period ended December 31, 2004. In
connection with our audits of the aforementioned consolidated financial
statements, we also audited the accompanying related consolidated
financial statement schedule. This consolidated financial statement
schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on this consolidated financial
statement schedule based on our audits.

In our opinion, such
financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in
all material respects, the information set forth therein.

As
discussed in Notes 1 and 2 to the consolidated financial statements,
effective April 1, 2004 (a convenience date for the April 6, 2004
acquisition date), a subsidiary of Celanese Holdings LLC acquired
84.3% of the outstanding stock of Celanese AG in a business
combination. As a result of the acquisition, the consolidated financial
information for the period after the acquisition is presented on a
different cost basis than that for the periods before the acquisition
and, therefore, is not comparable.

/s/ KPMG
LLPShort Hills, New Jersey March 30,
2006

---
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Edward F. Johnson

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14629.

*Mario PaulMikolitch,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

*Mitchell S. Brody,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided October 30, 1992

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 28 Conn. App. 708 (AC 10015), is granted, lirhited to the following questions:

“1. Was the Appellate Court correct in refusing to review the defendant’s claim that the trial court improperly denied his motion to dismiss which claimed that a peace officer does not have probable cause to effectuate a warrantless arrest for a misdemeanor committed outside the presence of that officer?

“2. In order to establish a violation of General Statutes § 14-224 (b), must the state prove that the defendant knew that the accident in which he was involved caused ‘injury or damage to property?’ ”
#### MAY, Respondent, v. JONES et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

February 15, 1905.)

Action by Moses May against Louis M. Jones and Thomas W. Jones.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

HOOKER, J., not voting.