alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**NAVISTAR      FINALIZES $1.5 BILLION LOAN AGREEMENT; **

**ANNOUNCES      TENDER OFFER AND CONSENT **

**SOLICITATION      FOR ITS 4.75 PERCENT SUBORDINATED EXCHANGEABLE NOTES**

***Terms of Tender Offer and Consent      Solicitation***

----

**About      Navistar**

**Forward      Looking Statements**

*Information      provided and statements made that are not purely historical are forward      -looking. Such forward-looking statements only speak as of the date of this      report and we assume no obligation to update the information included in this      report, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.      Such      forward-looking statements include information concerning our possible or      assumed future results of operations, including descriptions of our business      strategy. These statements often include words such as “believe,” “expect,”“anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate” or similar expressions. These      statements are not guarantees of performance or results and they involve risks,      uncertainties and assumptions which could have a material adverse effect on      the      company’s liquidity position and financial condition. Although we believe      that these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions,      there      are many other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially      from      those in the forward-looking statements.  For a further description of      these and other factors, see Exhibit 99.1 to our Form 10-K for the fiscal year      ended October 31, 2004.*
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.135 What will BSEE do if my operating performance is unacceptable?

BSEE will determine if your operating performance is unacceptable. BSEE will refer a determination of unacceptable performance to BOEM, who may disapprove or revoke your designation as operator on a single facility or multiple facilities. We will give you adequate notice and opportunity for a review by BSEE officials before making a determination that your operating performance is unacceptable.
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.294 May I combine the Conceptual Plan and the DWOP? If your development project meets the following criteria, you may submit a combined Conceptual Plan/DWOP on or before the deadline for submitting the Conceptual Plan. ( a ) The project is located in water depths of less than 400 meters (1,312 feet); and
( b ) The project is similar to projects involving non-conventional production or completion technology for which you have obtained approval previously.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-41110

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GERALD GALLAWAY,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:00-CR-62-1

--------------------

May 23, 2002

Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gerald Gallaway appeals his 151-month sentence following his

jury-trial conviction for conspiracy to distribute and possession

with the intent to distribute cocaine base and heroin, in

violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Gallaway contends

that his sentence was imposed in violation of Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). 
No. 01-41110

-2-

Gallaway did not challenge his sentence on these grounds in

the district court, thus, this court reviews his assertion for

plain error only. See United States v. Vasquez-Zamora, 253 F.3d

211, 213 (5th Cir. 2001). Because Gallaway was sentenced below

the statutory maximum for the offense charged in his indictment,

there was no Apprendi violation. See United States v. Keith, 230

F.3d 784, 787 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1182

(2001); United States v. Randle, 259 F.3d 319, 322 (5th Cir.

2001). Gallaway has not shown plain error; indeed, he has not

shown any error at all. Accordingly, we AFFIRM.

AFFIRMED.
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1604 General requirements. Sulphur lessees shall comply with requirements of this section when conducting well-drilling, well-completion, well-workover, or production operations. ( a ) *Equipment movement.* The movement of well-drilling, well-completion, or well-workover rigs and related equipment on and off an offshore platform, or from one well to another well on the same offshore platform, including rigging up and rigging down, shall be conducted in a safe manner.
( b ) Hydrogen sulfide (H *2* S). When a drilling, well-completion, well-workover, or production operation is being conducted on a well in zones known to contain H2S or in zones where the presence of H2S is unknown (as defined in § 250.490 of this part), the lessee shall take appropriate precautions to protect life and property, especially during operations such as dismantling wellhead equipment and flow lines and circulating the well. The lessee shall also take appropriate precautions when H2S is generated as a result of sulphur production operations. The lessee shall comply with the requirements in § 250.490 of this part as well as the requirements of this subpart.
( c ) *Welding and burning practices and procedures.* All welding, burning, and hot-tapping activities involved in drilling, well-completion, well-workover or production operations shall be conducted with properly maintained equipment, trained personnel, and appropriate procedures in order to minimize the danger to life and property according to the specific requirements in §§ 250.109 through 250.113 of this part.
( d ) *Electrical requirements.* All electrical equipment and systems involved in drilling, well-completion, well-workover, and production operations shall be designed, installed, equipped, protected, operated, and maintained so as to minimize the danger to life and property in accordance with the requirements of § 250.114 of this part.
( e ) *Structures on fixed OCS platforms.* Derricks, cranes, masts, substructures, and related equipment shall be selected, designed, installed, used, and maintained so as to be adequate for the potential loads and conditions of loading that may be encountered during the operations. Prior to moving equipment such as a well-drilling, well-completion, or well-workover rig or associated equipment or production equipment onto a platform, the lessee shall determine the structural capability of the platform to safely support the equipment and operations, taking into consideration corrosion protection, platform age, and previous stresses.
( f ) *Traveling-block safety device.* All drilling units being used for drilling, well-completion, or well-workover operations that have both a traveling block and a crown block must be equipped with a safety device that is designed to prevent the traveling block from striking the crown block. The device must be checked for proper operation weekly and after each drill-line slipping operation. The results of the operational check must be entered in the operations log.
TABLE OF CONTENTS     ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS  3      ARTICLE 2. TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES  3      ARTICLE 3. STRATEGIC CONSULTING SERVICE FEE  4      ARTICLE 4. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES  4      ARTICLE 5. CONFIDENTIALITY  4      ARTICLE 6. GOVERNING LAW AND EVENTS OF DEFAULT  4      ARTICLE 7. DISPUTE RESOLUTION  4      ARTICLE 8. EFFECTIVENESS  5      ARTICLE 9. NO SUBSEQUENT OBLIGATION  5      ARTICLE 10. TRANSFER LIMITATION  5      ARTICLE 11. COMPENSATION  5      ARTICLE 12. AMENDMENT  5      ARTICLE 13. COUNTERPARTS  5      ARTICLE 14. MISCELLANEOUS  5      EXHIBIT 1 CONTENT OF THE STRATEGIC CONSULTING SERVICES  6      EXHIBIT 2 STRATEGIC CONSULTING SERVICE FEE  7      
 
2

 
STRATEGIC CONSULTING SERVICE AGREEMENTThis Strategic Consulting Service Agreement (“this Agreement”) is entered into in Beijing, thePeople’s Republic of China (the “PRC”) on November 20, 2009 beween:Party A: Fortune (Beijing) Qicheng Technology Co., Ltd.
#### BINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. BUFFALO RY. CO., Defendant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 13, 1903.)

Action by Charles W. Bingham, administrator, against the Buffalo Railway Company.

No opinion. Plaintiff’s exceptions overruled. Motion for new trial denied, and judgment ordered for defendants, with costs.

SPRING and HISCOCK, JJ., dissenting.
Order filed December 11, 2014

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________

No. 11-14-00129-CR

___________

LANNY MARVIN BUSH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 42nd District Court

Coleman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2602

O R D E R

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney of record, Perry B. Sims, has filed in 

this court a motion to withdraw as counsel for Appellant. Counsel states that he 

“has accepted an offer to become an Assistant District Attorney for the 452nd 

Judicial District” and that he must, therefore, withdraw from the practice of 

criminal defense. Counsel’s motion complies with TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5. The 

motion is granted, and the appeal is abated. 
2

The trial court is directed to appoint new counsel to represent Appellant on 

appeal, and the trial court clerk is instructed to file in this court on or before 

December 31, 2014, a supplemental clerk’s record evidencing such appointment. 

The appeal will be reinstated when the supplemental clerk’s record is filed in this 

court.

PER CURIAM

December 11, 2014

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
##### 



Exhibit 99.3

CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IMPSAT Fiber Networks, Inc., as
registrant, and IMPSAT S.A. (the Company), as co-registrant, on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the Report) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Marcelo Girotti, Regional Manager
and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by
the principal executive officer of the Company with the requirements of Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be disclosed, distributed or
used by any person or for any reason other than as specifically required by
law.

|                |  |                                                                              
|--------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|August 14, 2002 |  | /s/ MARCELO GIROTTIMarcelo Girotti
Regional Manager and Chairman of the Board
### Geology of the southeastern bauxite deposits

By: Elizabeth Claire Fischer Overstreet

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1199A

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 14

- 00816

- CV

Style: Curocom Energy LLC and Curo Holdings Co. Ltd

v Woong Soon Eem and Jason Kim

Date motion filed * : December 5, 2014

Type of motion: Motion to Extend Time to File Notice of Appeal

Party filing motion: Woolim Resources Development Company Ltd., Woolim Energy Holdings, LLC and

Woolim Construction Company, Ltd

.

After considering the motion and the response, the court GRANTS the motion for an extension of time to file a

notice of appeal, filed by Woolim Resour ces Development Company Ltd., Woolim Energy Holdings, LLC and

Woolim Construction Company, Ltd, to the date of its filing.

Judge ’ s Signature: /s/ Justice Jane Bland

Acting Individually

Date: January 7, 2015
§ 18.50 Protection against external arcs and sparks. Provision shall be made for maintaining the frames of all off-track machines and the enclosures of related detached components at safe voltages by using one or a combination of the following: ( a ) A separate conductor(s) in the portable cable in addition to the power conductors by which the machine frame can be connected to an acceptable grounding medium, and a separate conductor in all cables connecting related components not on a common chassis. The cross-sectional area of the additional conductor(s) shall not be less than 50 percent of that of one power conductor unless a ground-fault tripping relay is used, in which case the minimum size may be No. 8 (AWG). Cables smaller than No. 6 (AWG) shall have an additional conductor(s) of the same size as one power conductor.
( b ) A means of actuating a circuit-interrupting device, preferably at the outby end of the portable cable. Note:
The frame to ground potential shall not exceed 40 volts.
( c ) A device(s) such as a diode(s) of adequate peak inverse voltage rating and current-carrying capacity to conduct possible fault current through the grounded power conductor. Diode installations shall include: ( 1 ) An overcurrent device in series with the diode, the contacts of which are in the machine's control circuit; and
( 2 ) a blocking diode in the control circuit to prevent operation of the machine with the polarity reversed.
Exhibit 21.1

<TABLE>
                                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
<CAPTION>

                                                      Jurisdiction of
                     Entity                            Organization           Name Under Which Subsidiary Does Business
--------------------------------------------------- ------------------- ----------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                       <C>           <C>
Alaska United Fiber System Partnership                    Alaska        Alaska United Fiber System Partnership, Alaska
                                                                        United Fiber System, Alaska United

Fiber Hold Co., Inc.                                      Alaska        Fiber Hold Co., Inc., Fiber Hold Company

GCI Communication Corp.                                   Alaska        GCI, GCC, GCICC, GCI Communication Corp.

GCI, Inc.                                                 Alaska        GCI, GCI, Inc.

GCI Cable, Inc.                                           Alaska        GCI Cable, GCI Cable, Inc.

GCI Fiber Co., Inc.                                       Alaska        GCI Fiber Co., Inc., GCI Fiber Company

GCI Holdings, Inc.                                        Alaska        GCI Holdings, Inc.

GCI Satellite Co., Inc.                                   Alaska        GCI Satellite Co., Inc., GCI Satellite Company

GCI Transport Co., Inc.                                   Alaska        GCI Transport Co., Inc., GCI Transport Company

Potter View Development Co., Inc.                         Alaska        Potter View Development Co., Inc.

GCI Cablesystems of Alaska, Inc.                          Alaska        GCI Cablesystems of Alaska, Inc., Rogers Cable

GCI American Cablesystems, Inc.                           Delaware      GCI American Cablesystems, Inc.

GCI Fiber Communication, Co., Inc.                        Alaska        GCI Fiber Communication, Co., Inc., GFCC,  Kanas

WOK 1, Inc.                                               Alaska        WOK 1

WOK 2, Inc.                                               Alaska        WOK 2
</TABLE>
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Robert A. Morrison, President and director of HS3
Technologies Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of HS3 Technologies Inc.
      for the year ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of HS3 Technologies Inc.                                                             

Dated: October 10, 2007



*/s/ Robert A. Morrison*
  Robert A. Morrison 
  President and Director 
  (Principal Executive Officer) 
  HS3 Technologies Inc.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to HS3 Technologies
Inc. and will be retained by HS3 Technologies Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       4,983,112
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,209,199
<ALLOWANCES>                                   132,048
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,039,595
<PP&E>                                       3,704,960
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,652,706
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,844,218
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,594,238
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        199
<COMMON>                                        13,408
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,222,933
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,844,218
<SALES>                                      2,695,129
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,695,129
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,957,044
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               186,843
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                82,399
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,691
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,448,757)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,448,757)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.47)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1


 


Plan Amendment


  


AMENDMENT TO


DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS,
INC.


2014 EQUITY INCENTIVE
PLAN


 


This
Amendment (the “Plan Amendment”) to the DecisionPoint Systems, Inc. 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is
made effective by DecisionPoint Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), subject to approval by the Company’s
stockholders.


 


WHEREAS,
the Company desires to amend the DecisionPoint Systems, Inc. 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (as amended and in effect, the “Plan”)
to increase the aggregate number of shares authorized for issuance under the Plan by 500,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001
per share, of the Company.


 


WHEREAS,
on December 16, 2021, subject to stockholder approval, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the Amendment.


 


NOW
THEREFORE, in accordance with Section 14 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


 


	 	1.	Section 5(b) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated to read as follows:  


 


“Subject to Section
12 of this Plan, the Committee is authorized to deliver under this Plan an aggregate one million six hundred thousand (1,600,000) Common
Shares.”


 


	 	
    2.

     

     

     

    3
	
    The Plan Amendment shall be effective upon approval
    of the stockholders of the Company at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. If the Plan Amendment is not so approved at such meeting,
    then the amendment to the Plan set forth herein shall be void ab initio.

    The Plan Amendment is
    intended to give effect to the 1-for-2 reverse stock split effected by the Company in December 2021, and, after giving effect to that
    reverse stock split, upon approval of the Plan Amendment, a total of 1,600,000 shares of Company common stock will be reserved for issuance
    under the Plan.



 





	 	4.	Except herein above provided, the Plan is hereby ratified, confirmed and approved in all respects.