alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          89,472                  89,472
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,315                  19,315
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,757                 111,757
<PP&E>                                          26,263                  26,263
<DEPRECIATION>                                (14,195)                (14,195)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 202,648                 202,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,236                  24,236
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            29                      29
<OTHER-SE>                                     176,804                 176,804
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   202,648                 202,648
<SALES>                                         12,434                  29,134
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,434                  29,134
<CGS>                                            3,559                   8,998
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,559                   8,998
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,158                  65,446
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  35                     118
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,322)                (43,325)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        95                     333
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,357)                (43,506)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,357)                (43,506)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.55)                  (1.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.55)                  (1.67)


</TABLE>
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3325 

To conduct a study evaluating whether there are correlations between the 

commission of methamphetamine crimes and identity theft crimes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 18, 2005 

Mr. REICHERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To conduct a study evaluating whether there are correlations 

between the commission of methamphetamine crimes and 

identity theft crimes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Methamphetamine and 

5 Identity Theft Study Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STUDY. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General shall con8 duct a study evaluating whether there is a connection be9 tween the commission of crimes involving methamphet10 amine and the commission of identity theft crimes. 
2 

•HR 3325 IH 

1 (b) CONTENTS.—The study conducted under this sec2 tion shall— 

3 (1) include— 

4 (A) a statistical analysis of whether there 

5 is a correlation between methamphetamine 

6 crimes and identity theft crimes; and 

7 (B) if the Attorney General finds a high 

8 degree of statistical correlation under subpara9 graph (A), findings regarding the reason for 

10 this correlation; 

11 (2) evaluate the advisability of imposing a sen12 tencing enhancement— 

13 (A) if a person commits both a meth14 amphetamine crime and an identity theft crime; 

15 and 

16 (B) if a person is part of a conspiracy to 

17 commit methamphetamine and identity theft 

18 crimes; 

19 (3) evaluate the advisability of establishing a 

20 password-protected electronic clearinghouse within 

21 the Department of Justice for Federal, State, and 

22 local law enforcement agencies to— 

23 (A) share information on crimes involving 

24 both methamphetamine and the commission of 

25 identity theft; 
3 

•HR 3325 IH 

1 (B) create a better understanding of the 

2 correlation between these crimes; and 

3 (C) share best practices; and 

4 (4) evaluate whether individuals who use meth5 amphetamine are more likely to commit certain 

6 kinds of identity theft crimes, such as through the 

7 use of mail, than others committing identity theft 

8 crimes. 

9 SEC. 3. REPORT. 

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 18 months after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Attorney Gen12 eral shall submit a report to Congress describing the find13 ings of the study conducted under section 2. 

14 (b) CONTENTS.—The report shall detail the findings 

15 of the study and recommend any enhancements to crimi16 nal penalties or other specific amendments to law, if any, 

17 that the Attorney General believes are necessary or advis18 able. 

Æ
-125°00'00" -124°57'00" -124°54'00" -124°51’00" -124°48'00" “90” “00” 90"
40°00" 00" 124°48°00" -124°45'00" -124°42’00" -124°39’00" -124°36'00" -124°33'00” -124°30'00" -124°27/00" -124°24’00” -124°21'00" -124°18/00" -124°15'00" -124°12'00" -124%09'00" -124°06'00" -124°03'00" -124°00' 00”
© y rr 40°00’ 00”

pe —
iva 'vehugy ew peor

eelewt
CASIWON SINIANTEEG

39°57’ 00”

39°57’ 00"

39°54’ 00"

39°54’ 00”

; ,
sey ng”
39°51’ 00 oS
39°51’ 00"
O

ly
tos
39° 4800" 4 3
Ss 39° 48/00" i)
_ 8
i, °
Le

39°45'00" RK

39° 45’ 00"

39° 42’ 00”

39° 42’ 00"

39°39’ 00"

39°39’ 00”

39° 36’ 00”

39° 36’ 00”

ey

39° 33’ 00”

39° 33’ 00”

39°30'00" =+#
-125°00' 00". -124°57'00" -124°54' 00"

*y24°33°00" 12430’ 00" -124°27' 00" -124°24' 00" -124°21'00" -124°18/00" -124°15' 00" -124°12°00" ~124°09'00" ~124°06" 00" -124°03/00" Sioe0o- 06"
VIZCAINO CANYON N395124Ww ae
SCALE: 1:100,000

NOS MULTIBEAM SURVEYS

Contours in corrected meters

LM133

~\
CO oO oy) ove CawY ew
©

|

|

| BBSWINN SONIA

HSSIWNN SONIA |

j

EEIGWINN ONIAVEQ |

|
—_
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER OF TRAMMELL CROW COMPANYPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Qfor the period ending June 30, 2005 and filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Derek R. McClain,Chief Financial Officer of Trammell Crow Company (the “Company”), herebycertify that:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|                            | /s/ DEREK R. MCCLAIN    |
|----------------------------|-------------------------|
|                       | Name: Derek R.  McClain |
| Date: August 9,  2005 |                    |

 

----
**Exhibit 4.2**

**China Finance Online’s 2006 Annual General Meeting as a publicly traded company was held in**

**Beijing at 10:00 am (Beijing time) on August 30, 2006**

Meeting address: 9th Floor ofTower C, Corporate Square, No. 35 Financial Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100032, China 

At this annual general meeting ofshareholders, five proposals have been submitted. 

The Results of this Meeting are as follows: 

Mr. Kheng Nam Lee and Mr. Fansheng Guo were re-elected as directors for the ensuing two years and until their successors are elected and dulyqualified; 

Our shareholders approved the appointment of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA Ltd. as our independent auditors for a term ending onthe date of our next annual general meeting to be held in 2007 and authorized the board of directors to determine their remuneration; 

Ourshareholders approved the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005 together with the Reports of the Directors and the Auditors; 

Our shareholders authorized the board of directors during the next year to issue ordinary shares or preference shares upon such terms and conditions as the board of directors, in its discretion, shalldetermine, without any further action by the shareholders; 

Our shareholders approved the increase in the number of ordinary shares availablefor issuance under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan by 5,000,000 ordinary shares to 15,688,488 ordinary shares.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IMPSAT Fiber Networks on Form 10-Q
for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Héctor Alonso, Chief Financial
Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge, that:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.

|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2003 |  |                                      
|                      |  |                                      
|                      |  | /s/ Héctor Alonso                    
|                      |  |                                      
|                      |  | Héctor Alonso
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.2

Consent of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of
DirectorsJames River Coal Company:

We consent to
the  incorporation  by reference in the registration  statement (No.  333-118190) on Form
S-1 of James River Coal Company  of our report dated March 25,  2005,  with respect to
the  consolidated  balance  sheets of James River Coal Company and subsidiaries as of December 31,  2004
(Successor  Company)  and 2003  (Predecessor  Company),  and the  related  consolidated
statements  of  operations,  changes  in  shareholders'  equity  (deficit)  and
comprehensive  income  (loss),  and cash flows,  for the eight  months  ended  December
31, 2004  (Successor  Company),  the four months ended April 30, 2004  (Predecessor
Company) and each of the years in the two-year  period ended  December 31, 2003
(Predecessor  Company),  which report  appears in the December 31, 2004,  annual  report
on Form 10-K of James River  Coal Company.  Our report included  explanatory  paragraphs
that state that (1) in connection with the Company's emergence from Chapter  11, all
assets and  liabilities  were  restated  to their  respective  fair values as of May 6,
2004 in order to reflect the effects of  fresh start accounting and, as a result,  the
consolidated  financial  statements of the Successor Company are presented on a different
basis than those of the  Predecessor  Company and,  therefore,  are not comparable and
(2) the Company changed its method of accounting  for reclamation liabilities and its
method of accounting for redeemable preferred stock in 2003.

/s/ KPMG LLP  Richmond, Virginia
March 29, 2005
EXHIBIT
32.2





Certification
of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350)





I, Edward W. Martin, III, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer of American Casino & Entertainment
Properties LLC (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge, on the date hereof:





(a)
            the
      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31,
      2009 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





(b)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







By: /s/
EDWARD W. MARTIN, III


Edward W.
Martin, III


Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer of


American
Casino & Entertainment Properties LLC




Date:
March 22, 2010
### §752. Corporate real estate holdings

No corporation shall be authorized to conduct the business of buying and selling real estate or be permitted to hold or own real estate except such as may be reasonably necessary to enable it to carry out the purposes for which it was created, and every corporation authorized after May 1, 1900, to engage in agriculture shall by its charter be restricted to the ownership and control of not to exceed five hundred acres of land; and this provision shall be held to prevent any member of a corporation engaged in agriculture from being in any wise interested in any other corporation engaged in agriculture. Corporations, however, may loan funds upon real estate security, and purchase real estate when necessary for the collection of loans, but they shall dispose of real estate so obtained within five years after receiving the title. Corporations not organized in Puerto Rico, and doing business therein, shall be bound by the provisions of this section so far as they are applicable.

(May 1, 1900, No. 23, §3, 31 Stat. 716; Mar. 2, 1917, ch. 145, §39, 39 Stat. 964; May 17, 1932, ch. 190, 47 Stat. 158; July 3, 1950, ch. 446, §5(2), 64 Stat. 320.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 3 (less first sentence) of act May 1, 1900. The first sentence of such section 3 was superseded by section 39 of act Mar. 2, 1917. Prior to repeal of such section 39 by act July 3, 1950, the sentence read: "That all franchises, privileges or concessions granted under section thirty-two of said Act [act Apr. 12, 1900, ch. 191, 31 Stat. 83] shall provide that the same shall be subject to amendment, alteration, or repeal; shall forbid the issue of stock or bonds, except in exchange for actual cash, or property at a fair valuation, equal in amount to the par value of the stock or bonds issued; shall forbid the declaring of stock or bond dividends; and, in the case of public-service corporations, shall provide for the effective regulation of the charges thereof and for the purchase or taking by the public authorities of their property at a fair and reasonable valuation."

Section was not enacted as a part of the Puerto Rican Federal Relations Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Puerto Rico" substituted in text for "Porto Rico" pursuant to act May 17, 1932, which is classified to section 731a of this title.

#### Repeals

Section 5(2) of act July 3, 1950, repealed section 39 of act Mar. 2, 1917, cited as a credit to this section, eff. July 25, 1952. See Effective Date of Repeal note set out below.

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal of section 39 of act Mar. 2, 1917, effective July 25, 1952, see note set out under section 732 of this title.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSecurity Policy for a Generic Space Exploration Communication Network ArchitectureThis document is one of three. It describes various security mechanisms and a security policy profile for a generic space-based communication architecture. Two other documents accompany this document- an Operations Concept (OpsCon) and a communication architecture document. The OpsCon should be read first followed by the security policy profile described by this document and then the architecture document. The overall goal is to design a generic space exploration communication network architecture that is affordable, deployable, maintainable, securable, evolvable, reliable, and adaptable. The architecture should also require limited reconfiguration throughout system development and deployment. System deployment includes subsystem development in a factory setting, system integration in a laboratory setting, launch preparation, launch, and deployment and operation in space.Document ID20160013860Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsIvancic, William D.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Sheehe, Charles J.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Vaden, Karl R.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredNovember 30, 2016Publication DateNovember 1, 2016Subject CategoryComputer SystemsSpace Communications, Spacecraft Communications, Command And TrackingReport/Patent NumberGRC-E-DAA-TN32924E-19246NASA/TM-2016-219123Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 854319.01.99.99.99.99.22Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.KeywordsnetworkingcommunicationssecurityAvailable DownloadsNameType20160013860.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of                the                Company. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                *Sundaresan                Raja* |
|-----------------------------------------------------|
| Sundaresan                Raja                      |
| Chief                Executive Officer              |
| April                7, 2008                        |

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7835

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BARRY STANLEY WASHINGTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (CR-92-296-WS, CA-98-549-1)

Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 16, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barry Stanley Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Barry Stanley Washington seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Washington, Nos. CR-92-

296-WS; CA-98-549-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 30, 1998). We also deny Washington’s motion for the preparation of a transcript at government’s

expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 99.2



Report Of Independent
 Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors
Structured Obligations Corporation
 New York, New York

We have examined the compliance of Structured Obligations Corporation (Depositor) and U.S. Bank National Association (Trustee) with the Base Trust Agreement and the Select Notes Trust Supplement LT 2004-1 (the Agreements) relating to the administration of the underlying securities and related credit support deposited in or held by the Select Notes Trust LT 2004-1 for the year ended December 31, 2016.  Depositor's management is responsible for compliance with those requirements.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance with the Agreements based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about Depositor's and Trustee's compliance with those requirements described above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination of Depositor's and Trustee's compliance with specified requirements.

In our opinion, Depositor and Trustee complied, in all material respects, with the requirements described above of the Agreements for the year ended December 31, 2016.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Depositor, the Trustee, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Certificate Holders of the Select Notes Trust LT 2004-1, and is not intended to be, and should not be used by anyone other than those specified parties.

/s/ RubinBrown LLP



Overland Park, Kansas

March 27, 2017
### §399. Support of political candidates prohibited

No noncommercial educational broadcasting station may support or oppose any candidate for political office.

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title III, §399, as added Pub. L. 90–129, title II, §201(8), Nov. 7, 1967, 81 Stat. 368; amended Pub. L. 93–84, §2, Aug. 6, 1973, 87 Stat. 219; Pub. L. 94–309, §7, June 5, 1976, 90 Stat. 685; Pub. L. 97–35, title XII, §1229, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 730; Pub. L. 100–626, §10, Nov. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 3211.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–626, in section catchline, substituted "Support of" for "Editorializing and support of", and in text, struck out provisions which prohibited editorializing by noncommercial educational broadcasting station which receives grant from Corporation under subpart C of this part.

1981—Pub. L. 97–35 revised subsec. (a) into existing provisions and, as so revised, added requirement respecting grant under subpart C of this part, and struck out subsec. (b), which related to program recording of broadcasts where issues of public importance are discussed.

1976—Subsec. (b)(5). Pub. L. 94–309 added par. (5).

1973—Pub. L. 93–84 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).