alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to**

**Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002**

I, Héctor Alonso, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IMPSAT Fiber Networks, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) [omitted] 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

November 14, 2006
#### General Accident Insurance Group, Appellant, v Celia Cirucci et al., Respondents, and Aetna Life & Casualty Company, Respondent.

In a special proceeding to stay arbitration pending a trial on the issue of the validity of a disclaimer of insurance coverage by respondent Aetna Life & Casualty Company, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 9, 1976, which, after a nonjury trial, determined that the disclaimer was valid and vacated an order which had temporarily stayed the arbitration. Judgment reversed, on the law, with costs to petitioner payable by respondent Aetna Life & Casualty Company, the disclaimer is determined to be invalid and the application to stay arbitration is granted. Respondent Aetna Life & Casualty Company, in its original letter of disclaimer, failed to assert the alleged unreasonable delay by claimants-respondents in giving notice of the occurrence. Aetna cannot now assert that delay as the basis for its disclaimer (see *Appell v Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.,*22 AD2d 906, affd 17 NY2d 519). Moreover, the right of an injured third-party to recover exists independently of the insured’s obligation to provide notice *(Lauritano v American Fid. Fire Ins. Co.,*3 AD2d 564, affd 4 NY2d 1028). There is also no evidence that the insured "willfully] and avowed[ly]” obstructed the respondent-insurer’s investigation thereby supporting the defense of lack of co-operation (see *Thrasher v United States Liab. Ins. Co.,*19 NY2d 159, 168). Martuscello, J. P., Titone, Suozzi and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 8, 2011

d0228 

# Order

March 8, 2011

140522(28)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140522 COA: 293861 Wayne CC: 09-004275-FC RODNEY CARTER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e motion for reconsideration of this Court’s November 5, 2010 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

Y OUNG 

### , C.J., would grant the motion for reconsideration.
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.151 How do I name facilities in the Pacific Region?

The operator assigns a name to the facility.
130 STAT. 1522 PUBLIC LAW 114–306—DEC. 16, 2016 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5948: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

Nov. 30, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 9, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–306 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 830 Kuhn 

Drive in Chula Vista, California, as the ‘‘Jonathan ‘J.D.’ De Guzman Post Office 

Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. JONATHAN ‘‘J.D.’’ DE GUZMAN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 830 Kuhn Drive in Chula Vista, California, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Jonathan ‘J.D.’ De Guzman Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Jonathan ‘J.D.’ De Guzman Post Office Building’’. 

Approved December 16, 2016. 

Dec. 16, 2016 

[H.R. 5948] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.1



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-139192 and 333-123802 on Form S-8 of our report dated May 28, 2007, relating
to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of
China Finance Online Co. Limited appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of
China Finance Online Co. Limited for the year ended December 31, 2006.



/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA Ltd.
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA Ltd.
Beijing, China
May 29, 2007
#### O’BRIEN et al., Respondents, v. THOMAS et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 10, 1905.)

Action by John O’Brien and another against Edward R. Thomas and others. No opinion. Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
#### NORMAN, Respondent, v. LOOMIS-MANNING FILTER CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 3, 1905.)

Action by F. Stout Norman against the Loomis-Manning Filter Company. No opinion. Order affirmed, on argument, with $10 costs and disbursements.
§ 1208.4 Royalty oil sales to eligible refiners. ( a ) *Determination to take royalty oil in kind.* The Secretary may evaluate crude oil market conditions from time to time. The evaluation will include, among other things, the availability of crude oil and the crude oil requirements of the Federal Government, primarily those requirements concerning matters of national interest and defense. The Secretary will review these items and will determine whether eligible refiners have access to adequate supplies of crude oil and whether such oil is available to eligible refiners at equitable prices. Such determinations may be made on a regional basis. The determination by the Secretary shall be published in the Federal Register concurrent with or included in the “Notice of Availability of Royalty Oil” required by § 1208.5.
( b ) *Sale to eligible refiners.* ( 1 ) Upon a determination by the Secretary under paragraph (a) of this section that eligible refiners do not have access to adequate supplies of crude oil at equitable prices, the Secretary, at his or her discretion, may elect to take in kind some or all of the royalty oil accruing to the United States from oil and gas leases on Federal lands onshore and on the OCS. The Secretary may authorize ONRR to offer royalty oil for sale to eligible refiners only for use in their refineries and not for resale (other than under an exchange agreement).
( 2 ) All sales of royalty oil from onshore leases will be priced at the royalty value that would have been determined for that oil pursuant to 30 CFR part 1206 had the royalties been paid in value rather than taken in kind. All sales of royalty oil from OCS leases will be priced at the fair market value of the oil including associated transportation costs to the designated delivery point, if applicable.
( 3 ) An eligible refiner must have a representative at a sale in order to participate. The Secretary may, at his or her discretion, establish purchase limitations and withhold any royalty oil from any offering.
( c ) Upon a determination by the Secretary under paragraph (a) of this section that eligible refiners do have access to adequate supplies of crude oil at equitable prices, ONRR will not take royalties in kind from oil and gas leases for exclusive sale to such refiners. Such determinations may be made on a regional basis.
( d ) *Interim sales.* The ONRR generally will not conduct interim sales. However, interim sales may be held at the discretion of the Secretary if substantial addition royalty oil becomes available. The potentially eligible refiners, individually or collectively, must submit documentation demonstrating that adequate supplies of crude oil at equitable prices are not available for purchase. Although sufficient documentation must be submitted, it is not mandatory for each potentially eligible refiner to participate in a submission of such documentation to be determined eligible. The documentation must be submitted to ONRR for a determination as to whether an interim sale is needed.
[52 FR 41913, Oct. 30, 1987, as amended at 66 FR 28657, May 24, 2001]
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Alonzo H. King, Deceased. John Meehan, Appellant; Andrew H. King, Respondent.

Order entered on February 2,1961, denying proponent’s motion for summary judgment admitting the purported will of Alonzo H. King to probate and for related relief, unani*615mously modified, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of granting leave to proponent to renew his motion if so advised, and as so modified the order is affirmed, without costs. As we read the objections to probate, they are grounded solely on asserted noncompliance with the requirements of section 21 of the Decedent Estate Law. No questions relating to such matters as testamentary capacity, fraud or undue influence are raised. On the basis of the testimony of the subscribing witnesses taken pursuant to section 141 of the Surrogate’s Court Act and offered by proponent in support of his motion, we regarded the opposition to probate as ill-founded. We hold as a matter of law that the notations which follow the signatures of the decedent and the witnesses do not constitute a testamentary disposition, and we are satisfied that in other respects the requirements of section 21 have been met. *Matter of O’Melia*(213 App. Div. 387, 389) indicates that in permitting interrogation of the subscribing witnesses before the filing of objections, the purpose of section 141 of the Surrogate’s Court Act is *“*to enable possible objectors to gain knowledge of the facts before determining whether or not to file objections to probate.” Because of that purpose the Surrogate was of the view that summary grant or denial of probate may not be based on an examination under section 141. As rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, which is applicable to probate proceedings *(Matter of Pascal,*309 N. Y. 108), permits the use of depositions, we are not in accord. We appreciate the possibility that an inquiry undertaken only to explore the advisability of filing objections may for that reason sometimes be less thorough and comprehensive than the usual pretrial examination, but that is a factor to be weighed in assessing the probative force of the testimony, not one which wholly excludes it from consideration. The record shows, however, that the subscribing witnesses were examined on April 20, 1960, the objections were verified May 10, and the notice of motion was dated May 17. It is questionable therefore that, at the time the motion was made, the contestant had been afforded adequate opportunity for further investigation of the subject matter of the testimony. As such an investigation, whether by pursuit of pretrial procedures or otherwise, may since have been undertaken and may produce evidence advantageous to contestant’s ease, fairness requires that he be allowed to present it. For that reason we do not grant proponent’s motion but give him leave to renew it. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and Bastow, JJ. [27 Misc 2d 502.]
PUBLIC LAW 114–296—DEC. 16, 2016 130 STAT. 1509 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5309: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

Sept. 20, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 5, considered and passed Senate; passage vitiated. 

Dec. 9, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–296 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 401 McElroy 

Drive in Oxford, Mississippi, as the ‘‘Army First Lieutenant Donald C. Carwile 

Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ARMY FIRST LIEUTENANT DONALD C. CARWILE POST 

OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 401 McElroy Drive in Oxford, Mississippi, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Army First Lieutenant Donald 

C. Carwile Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Army First Lieutenant Donald C. Carwile Post Office 

Building’’. 

Approved December 16, 2016. 

Dec. 16, 2016 

[H.R. 5309] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive
        - U.S. Federal Labor Relations Authority

#  U.S. Federal Labor Relations Authority 

**Collected by:** Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive 

**Archived since:**Jul, 2014

**Description:**
The Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) is an independent administrative federal agency created by Title VII of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978. The FLRA governs labor relations between the federal government and its employees.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal

**Creator:**    	    U.S. Federal Labor Relations Authority

**Language:**    	    English,     	    Spanish

**Collector:**    	    U.S. Government Publishing Office

## Narrow Your Results

### 

            There are no further ways to narrow your results.           

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear

              - Sites
              - Search Page Text

Page 1 of 1  (3 Total Results)

**Sort By:**
                - Title (A-Z)
                - Title (Z-A)
                - URL (A-Z)
                - URL (Z-A)

### URL:     https://www.flra.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.youtube.com/c/FederalLaborRelationsAuthority/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.youtube.com/channel/UChxZxAWRochHxTLjRPWmuoQ

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

Page 1 of 1  (3 Total Results)

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
### **CHAPTER 1—ORGANIZATION**

Sec.
101.
Purpose.
102.
Department of Transportation.
103.
Federal Railroad Administration.
104.
Federal Highway Administration.
105.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
106.
Federal Aviation Administration.
107.
Federal Transit Administration.
108.
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.
109.
Maritime Administration.
110.
Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation.
[111, 112. Repealed.]
113.
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.
114.
Transportation Security Administration.
115.
Transportation Security Oversight Board.
116.
National Surface Transportation and Innovative Finance Bureau.
117.
Council on Credit and Finance.
118.
Office of Multimodal Freight Infrastructure and Policy.
119.
Advanced Research Projects Agency–Infrastructure.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2021**—Pub. L. 117–58, div. B, title I, §21101(c), title V, §25012(b), Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 656, 867, added items 118 and 119.

**2020**—Pub. L. 116–260, div. AA, title V, §512(c)(7)(B), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2757, substituted "Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation" for "Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation" in item 110.

**2015**—Pub. L. 114–94, div. A, title VI, §6012(b), title IX, §§9001(b), 9002(b), Dec. 4, 2015, 129 Stat. 1570, 1618, 1619, added items 116 and 117 and struck out item 112 which had read "Research and Innovative Technology Administration" and was subsequently changed to "Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology of the Department of Transportation" on authority of title I of div. L of Pub. L. 113–76, set out in part as a note under former section 112 of this title.

**2012**—Pub. L. 112–141, div. E, title II, §52011(c)(1), July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 895, struck out item 111 "Bureau of Transportation Statistics".

**2004**—Pub. L. 108–426, §§2(c)(1), 4(e), Nov. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2424, 2426, substituted "Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration" for "Coast Guard" in item 108 and "Research and Innovative Technology Administration" for "Research and Special Programs Administration" in item 112.

**2001**—Pub. L. 107–71, title I, §§101(b), 102(d), Nov. 19, 2001, 115 Stat. 602, 605, added items 114 and 115.

**1999**—Pub. L. 106–159, title I, §101(c)(1), Dec. 9, 1999, 113 Stat. 1751, added item 113.

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–272, §4(j)(5)(B), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1366, as amended by Pub. L. 103–429, §7(a)(3)(C), Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4388, struck out first item 110 "St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation".

**1992**—Pub. L. 102–508, title IV, §401(b), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3310, added item 112.

**1991**—Pub. L. 102–240, title III, §3004(c)(3), title VI, §6006(c), Dec. 18, 1991, 105 Stat. 2088, 2174, substituted "Federal Transit Administration" for "Urban Mass Transportation Administration" in item 107 and added second item 110 and item 111.
### §1973. Freely Associated State Air Carrier

(a) In furtherance of the objectives of the Compact of Free Association Act of 1985 (Public Law 99–239) [48 U.S.C. 1901 et seq., 2001 et seq.] and notwithstanding any other provision of law, a Freely Associated State Air Carrier shall not be precluded from providing transportation, between a place in the United States and a place in a state in free association with the United States or between two places in such a freely associated state, by air of persons (and their personal effects) and property procured, contracted for, or otherwise obtained by any executive department or other agency or instrumentality of the United States for its own account or in furtherance of the purposes or pursuant to the terms of any contract, agreement, or other special arrangement made or entered into under which payment is made by the United States or payment is made from funds appropriated, owned, controlled, granted, or conditionally granted, or utilized by or otherwise established for the account of the United States, or shall be furnished to or for the account of any foreign nation, or any international agency, or other organization of whatever nationality, without provisions for reimbursement.

(b) The term "Freely Associated State Air Carrier" shall apply exclusively to a carrier referred to in Article IX(5)(b) of the Federal Programs and Services Agreement concluded pursuant to Article II of Title Two and Section 232 of the Compact of Free Association.

(Pub. L. 102–247, title III, §303, Feb. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 39.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Compact of Free Association Act of 1985, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 99–239, Jan. 14, 1986, 99 Stat. 1770, which is classified principally to part A of subchapter I of this chapter and chapter 19 (§2001 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1901 of this title and Tables.

The Compact of Free Association, referred to in subsec. (b), probably means the Compact of Free Association between the Government of the United States and the Governments of the Marshall Islands and the Federated States of Micronesia, which is contained in section 201 of Pub. L. 99–239, set out as a note under section 1901 of this title.

#### Codification

Section was formerly set out as a note under section 1681 of this title.
#### § 18.52 Renewal of fuses.

Enclosure covers that provide access to fuses, other than headlight, control-circuit, and handheld-tool fuses, shall be interlocked with a circuit-interrupting device. Fuses shall be inserted on the load side of the circuit interrupter.