alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

       
<S>                                                         <C>    

<ARTICLE>                                                        5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                 1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                           SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                                      17,494
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                1,371
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   126
<INVENTORY>                                                    745
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            19,716
<PP&E>                                                       2,874
<DEPRECIATION>                                               1,978
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              35,088
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        5,973
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                        17
<OTHER-SE>                                                  29,010
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                35,088
<SALES>                                                      1,347
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             2,938
<CGS>                                                        1,266
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                1,975
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            14,541
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (13,718)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (13,718)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (13,718)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               (0.23)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of InteliData Technologies Corporation (the Company) for the period ended September 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alfred S. Dominick, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                                     
|--- |  | ------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Alfred S. Dominick, Jr.         
|    |  | Alfred S. Dominick, Jr.             
|    |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|    |  | (Principal Executive Officer)       



November 8, 2004



This certificate is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
13a-14 and Item 601 of Regulation S-K and not as a document filed as a part of the Report. This certificate shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any of the Companys Securities Act registration statements.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lorenzo Isaac, Appellant.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed.
§ 22.4 Application procedures and requirements. ( a ) Before MSHA will undertake an active investigation leading to approval of any methane detector, the applicant shall make application by letter for an investigation leading to approval of the detector. This application shall be sent to: U.S. Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration, Approval and Certification Center, 765 Technology Drive, Triadelphia, WV 26059, together with the required drawings, one complete detector, and instructions for its operation. Fees calculated in accordance with part 5 of this title shall be submitted in accordance with § 5.40.
( b ) Where the applicant for approval has used an independent laboratory under part 6 of this chapter to perform, in whole or in part, the necessary testing and evaluation for approval under this part, the applicant must provide to MSHA as part of the approval application: ( 1 ) Written evidence of the laboratory's independence and current recognition by a laboratory accrediting organization;
( 2 ) Complete technical explanation of how the product complies with each requirement in the applicable MSHA product approval requirements;
( 3 ) Identification of components or features of the product that are critical to the safety of the product; and
( 4 ) All documentation, including drawings and specifications, as submitted to the independent laboratory by the applicant and as required by this part.
( c ) An applicant may request testing and evaluation to non-MSHA product safety standards which have been determined by MSHA to be equivalent, under § 6.20 of this chapter, to MSHA's product approval requirements under this part.
[68 FR 36420, June 17, 2003, as amended at 70 FR 46343, Aug. 9, 2005; 70 FR 48872, Aug. 22, 2005; 73 FR 52212, Sept. 9, 2008]
### §20164. Development and use of rail safety technology

(a) In General.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008, the Secretary of Transportation shall prescribe standards, guidance, regulations, or orders governing the development, use, and implementation of rail safety technology in dark territory, in arrangements not defined in section 20501 or otherwise not covered by Federal standards, guidance, regulations, or orders that ensure the safe operation of such technology, such as—

(1) switch position monitoring devices or indicators;

(2) radio, remote control, or other power-assisted switches;

(3) hot box, high water, or earthquake detectors;

(4) remote control locomotive zone limiting devices;

(5) slide fences;

(6) grade crossing video monitors;

(7) track integrity warning systems; or

(8) other similar rail safety technologies, as determined by the Secretary.

(b) Dark Territory Defined.—In this section, the term "dark territory" means any territory in a railroad system that does not have a signal or train control system installed or operational.

(Added Pub. L. 110–432, div. A, title IV, §406(a), Oct. 16, 2008, 122 Stat. 4886; amended Pub. L. 114–94, div. A, title XI, §11316(i), Dec. 4, 2015, 129 Stat. 1677.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of enactment of the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008, referred to in subsec. (a), is the date of enactment of div. A of Pub. L. 110–432, which was approved Oct. 16, 2008.

#### Amendments

2015—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 114–94 substituted "after the date of enactment of the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008" for "after enactment of the Railroad Safety Enhancement Act of 2008" in introductory provisions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2015 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–94 effective Oct. 1, 2015, see section 1003 of Pub. L. 114–94, set out as a note under section 5313 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3309

To suspend temporarily the duty on nail clippers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2005

Mr. ROSS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on nail clippers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NAIL CLIPPERS AND NAIL FILES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.05.70 Nail clippers and nail files 

(provided for in subheading 

8214.20.30) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2

•HR 3309 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
Argued, and submitted March 9,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration April 22, 1998

#### In the Matter of the Marriage of Tonia Dawn GREENE, *Petitioner, and*Sean Jason GREENE, *Respondent.*STATE OF OREGON ex rel Tonia Greene TAYLOR, *Respondent, v.*Sean Jason GREENE, *Appellant.*

(92C-30096; CA A97372)

957 P2d 593

Richard F. Alway argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Holly Ann Vance, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Deits, Chief Judge, and Edmonds, Judge.

PER CURIAM

*620PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a judgment finding him in contempt for wilfully failing to pay child support.

On appeal, the state concedes that, during part of the time that the trial court considered in determining that there was wilful failure to pay, defendant was under no obligation to pay. The state argues that we should nevertheless affirm because other periods of time would support the judgment. Because we cannot tell whether the trial court would enter the same judgment if it excluded the time when defendant was not obligated to pay, we decline to do so.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


           CERTIFICATION PROVIDED BY THE ADMINISTRATOR WITH FORM 10-K


         Re:      Origen Manufactured Housing Contract Trust 2004-B (the "Trust"
                  or the "Issuer"), Origen Manufactured Housing Contract Trust
                  Collateralized Notes, Series 2004-B


         I, W. Anderson Geater, Jr., the senior officer of Origen Servicing,
Inc., the Administrator for Origen Manufactured Housing Contract Trust 2004-B
(the "Registrant"), certify that:


         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Registrant;

         2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
provided by the Indenture Trustee under the Indenture, and the servicing
information required to be provided to the Indenture Trustee by the Servicer
under the Servicing Agreement for inclusion in these reports, is included in
these reports;

         4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statements
included in the report and required to be delivered to the Indenture Trustee in
accordance with the terms of the Servicing Agreement, and except as disclosed in
the reports, the Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the Servicing
Agreement; and

         5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar procedure, as set forth in the servicing, or similar, agreement, that is
included in these reports.

         In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the Indenture Trustee and the Servicer.

         Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings
ascribed to them in Appendix A to the Indenture, dated September 1, 2004 (the
"Indenture"), between Origen Manufactured Housing Contract Trust 2004-B as
issuer, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as indenture trustee.


                             Origen Servicing, Inc.

                             By:  /s/ W. Anderson Geater, Jr.
                                  ---------------------------------
                                  Name: W. Anderson Geater, Jr.
                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer
                                  Date: March 30, 2005
**Exhibit
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of OccuLogix, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Elias Vamvakas,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to the best of my knowledge:




1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




By: /s/
      Elias Vamvakas


Elias Vamvakas


Chief
      Executive Officer




Dated:  March
      15,
      2007
#### Peerless Insurance Company, Respondent, v. Nationwide Insurance Company, Appellant, and Harold Jayson et al., Respondents.

Resettled order entered April 14, 1960, denying, among other things, the cross motion of the defendant Nationwide Insurance Company for summary judgment, unanimously modified to the extent of granting said defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment, with $10 costs, and as so modified, the resettled order is affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant Nationwide Insurance Company. Nationwide had issued an automobile liability policy to defendants Jayson — who operated a Summer camp — covering a pick-up truck. A camper was injured on July 7, 1957, apparently as she was climbing aboard the truck. Nationwide was not notified until April 19, 1958, when the Jaysons received a claim letter from the girl camper’s attorneys, although the policy required the insured to give written notice of an accident or occurrence “ as soon as practicable ”. Even assuming that the insureds were justified in supposing that the occurrence on July 7, 1957, was a trivial mishap, they were certainly alerted to the possibility of a claim being made when the camper’s father telephoned Jayson in November or December, 1957 and informed Jayson that radioactive treatments were being administered to the injured person’s leg. Any unreasonable delay in notifying the insurer from that point became inexcusable. The passage of four to five months from the receipt of such information to the time of notifying Nationwide constitutes late notice as a matter of law. Hence, there is no triable issue as to the reasonableness of the notice under the circumstances. The appeal from the order entered January 18, 1960, is dismissed, without costs, since that order was subsequently resettled by the order entered April 14, 1960. *(Matter of French*v. *Knapp,*170 App. Div. 959; *Young*v. *White,*158 App. Div. 763.) Settle order on notice. Concur—Valente, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Noonan, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q Quarterly Report ofEldorado Resorts LLC and Eldorado Capital Corp. (collectively, the “Company”)for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: November 13, 2003 | By:    | /s/ Donald L. Carano                      |
|--------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|                     |   | Donald L. Carano, Chief Executive Officer |
|                     |   | of Eldorado Resorts LLC and               |
|                     |   | Eldorado Capital Corp.                    |

 

 

----
I 0 4: 0·1 

2
Information as you requested on the Adams studies related to the ozone 

NAAQS

Lydia Wegman to: hking 11/04/2009 04:54 PM

Cc: James Brown, martin.karen, richmond.harvey, stone.susan, 

ross.mary, vandenberg.john, crabtree.tricia

Heidi,

Here is the information you requested about the Adams study. Please let us know if we have any 

questions. 

Lydia

----- Forwarded by Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US on 11/04/2009 04:51 PM -----

From: James Brown/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Dave Mckee/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Harvey 

Richmond/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Susan Stone/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Mary 

Ross/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, John Vandenberg/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 11/04/2009 04:35 PM

Subject:

In follow-up to the OMB request for materials, attached are the Adams (2006) publication and a 

secondary analysis (Brown et al., 2008) of the 0.060 ppm data. The secondary analysis addresses the 

issue of removing potential "outliers" from the data. 

___________________

James S. Brown, Ph.D.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Research and Development 

National Center for Environmental Assessment, B243-01

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-0765

Fax: (919) 541-1818
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent of BKD, LLP**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of Kentucky First Federal Bancorp on Form S-8 (File No. 333-130243) of our report dated September 19, 2007 on our audit of the consolidated financial statements of Kentucky First Federal Bancorp as of and for the year ended June 30, 2007, incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K of Kentucky First Federal Bancorp for the year ended June 30, 2007.

/s/ **BKD, LLP**

Cincinnati, Ohio September 25, 2007
#### George W. Smith, Respondent, v June Smith, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In affirming the order of Special Term which temporarily determined alimony, support, and other matters pending divorce proceedings, we note that "appeals from the granting of temporary alimony are not favored, as it is clearly more expedient and less consuming of both judicial time and that of the attorneys if counsel would promptly proceed to trial in accordance with section 249 of the Domestic Relations Law, which has legislatively expressed the entitlement to preference in the trial of such matters where justice so requires.” *(Gostin v Gostin,*41 AD2d 606.) The trial court is in the best position to make a permanent award of alimony and support as well as to provide for a final disposition of the marital property and custody of the issue of the marriage based on evidence adduced at the plenary trial. (See *Muscarello v Muscarello,*52 AD2d 932; *Levene v Levene,*41 AD2d 530; *De Gasper v De Gasper,*31 AD2d 886.) (Appeal from order of Fulton Supreme Court— *1134temporary alimony, etc.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Dillon, Hancock, Jr., Den-man and Witmer, JJ.
Exhibit 99.1

                         ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

                  I, Janice Ott Rotunno, a duly elected and acting officer of
J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association ("Indenture Trustee"), do hereby
certify on behalf of the Indenture Trustee, that:

                  1. I have reviewed and examined the performance by the
Indenture Trustee of the application of trust money collected by the Indenture
Trustee pursuant to Section 5.3 of the Indenture under which the Trust's notes
(the "Notes") were issued during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004 (the
"Relevant Year"); and

                  2. Based upon my review and examination described in 1 above,
and except as provided in the information furnished by the Indenture Trustee for
purposes of the auditor's report delivered pursuant to Section 2.2(a)(x) of the
Amended and Restated Administrative Services Agreement dated as of April 27,
2004, between AMACAR Pacific Corp. and Allstate Life Global Funding, to the best
of my knowledge, the application of trust money collected by the Indenture
Trustee pursuant to Section 5.3 of the Indenture was performed in accordance
with the terms of the Indenture throughout the Relevant Year.


J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association, as Indenture Trustee


By:        /s/ Janice Ott Rotunno
         -----------------------------------
         Name:  Janice Ott Rotunno
         Title:  Vice President


Date:     March 30, 2005
         -----------------------------------
### §2122. Location of Oversight Board

The Oversight Board shall have an office in the covered territory and additional offices as it deems necessary. At any time, any department or agency of the United States may provide the Oversight Board use of Federal facilities and equipment on a reimbursable or non-reimbursable basis and subject to such terms and conditions as the head of that department or agency may establish.

(Pub. L. 114–187, title I, §102, June 30, 2016, 130 Stat. 557.)
#### SESSELMAN, Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 23, 1903.

Action by Karl Sesselman against thel Metropolitan Street Railway Company.

No opinion. Motion denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2


                        CHINA FINANCE ONLINE CO. LIMITED

                                  Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned, Sam Qian, Chief Financial
Officer of China Finance Online Co. Limited (the "Company"), hereby certifies,
to his knowledge, that the Company's annual report on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: May 23, 2006               /s/ Sam Qian
                                 _______________________________
                                 Name:  Sam Qian
                                 Title: Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.