alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 18.60 Detailed inspection of components. An inspection of each electrical component shall include the following: ( a ) A detailed check of parts against the drawings submitted by the applicant to determine that: ( 1 ) The parts and drawings coincide; and
( 2 ) the minimum requirements stated in this part have been met with respect to materials, dimensions, configuration, workmanship, and adequacy of drawings and specifications.
( b ) Exact measurement of joints, journal bearings, and other flame-arresting paths.
( c ) Examination for unnecessary through holes.
( d ) Examination for adequacy of lead-entrance design and construction.
( e ) Examination for adequacy of electrical insulation and clearances between live parts and between live parts and the enclosure.
( f ) Examination for weaknesses in welds and flaws in castings.
( g ) Examination for distortion of enclosures before tests.
( h ) Examination for adequacy of fastenings, including size, spacing, security, and possibility of bottoming.
#### § 1201.100 Responsibilities of the Director for Office of Natural Resources Revenue.

The Director is responsible for the collection of certain rents, royalties, and other payments; for the receipt of sales and production reports; for determining royalty liability; for maintaining accounting records; for any audits of the royalty payments and obligations; and for any and all other functions relating to royalty management on Federal and Indian oil and gas leases.

[47 FR 47768, Oct. 27, 1982. Redesignated at 48 FR 35641, Aug. 5, 1983, and further redesignated and amended at 75 FR 61066, Oct. 4, 2010]
# ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

November 17, 2023 CR-2022-1262Marquell Kimbrough v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Wilcox Circuit Court: CC16-37) 

## NOTICE You are hereby notified that on November 17, 2023, the following action was taken in the above-reference cause by the Court of Criminal Appeals: Application for Rehearing Overruled.

D. Scott Mitchell, Clerk
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Robert V. Johnson, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of FCStone Group, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):



a) all significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|    |  |                                                                        
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /S/    ROBERT V.
JOHNSON                                               
|    |  | Robert V. Johnson Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)



Date:
May 25, 2006
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Pasquale Romano, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the County Court, Kings County, made March 16, 1960, denying, without a hearing, his *coram nobis*application to vacate a judgment of said court, rendered December *107717, 1951, convicting him o£ burglary in the third degree and grand larceny in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to serve a term of 18 to 20 years. The ground for the application is that the trial court failed to comply with section 433 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in that, when the jur-y was brought into court to report their verdict, their names were not called. Order affirmed. *(People*v. *Manila,*7 N Y 2d 319; *People ex rel. Meers*v. *Martin,*4 A D 2d 659, affd. 4 17 Y 2d 898.) Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
(39 Misc. Rep. 548.)

#### SANFORD v. RHOADS et al.

(Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County.'

January, 1903.)

1. Pleading — Defenses—Admission.

Admissions in defenses in an answer will be stricken out as irrelevant.

Action by Robert Sanford against Benjamin T. Rhoads, Jr., and others'. Motion to strike out portions of the answer.

Granted.

Edward S. Clinch, for plaintiff.

Samuel B. Thomas, for defendants.

GAYNOR, J.

The first paragraph or subdivision of the answer consists of admissions, as though admissions were a necessary part •of or ought to be in an answer; and the second paragraph, of denials.

*405Then come five defences, each being introduced by an allegation that the defendants “re-allege all the allegations contained in the first and second paragraphs of this answer, to be of and to have the same force and effect as though the same were herein again set forth in full and at large.”

The motion to strike this matter out of each defence as irrelevant and redundant under section 545 of the Code of Civil Procedure must be granted. It is useless to again point out the reason why denials cannot be part of a “defence.” A “defence” can only consist of matter which cannot be proved under a denial, and which, taking every allegation of the complaint to be true, nevertheless defeats the action. Any other matter in it is irrelevant there. A “defence” is" “confession and avoidance,” i. e., it is on the basis that confessing the complaint to be true, the matter pleaded as a defence nevertheless avoids or defeats it. The phrase has recently been turned about and put in disjunctive form, being changed to read “avoidance or confession” (Staten Island M. R. Co. v. Hinchliffe, 170 N. Y. 48], 63 N. E. 545), but I suppose nevertheless that it has lost neither its form nor its life in our educated profession.

Motion granted, with $10 costs.
#### § 891.645 Adjustment of utility allowances.

In connection with adjustments of contract rents as provided in § 891.640(a), the requirements for the adjustment of utility allowances provided in § 891.440 apply.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Parks! America, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:  The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 26, 2010 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Dated: March 23, 2011   /s/ Dale Van Voorhis Dale Van Voorhis Chief Executive Officer Parks! America, Inc.    Dated: March 23, 2011   /s/ Dale Van Voorhis Jon Laria Chief Financial Officer Parks! America, Inc.   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Parks! America, Inc. and will be retained by Parks! America, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 990.250 Requirements for certain appeals. ( a ) Appeals under § 990.245 (a) and (c) must be submitted once annually. Appeals under § 990.245 (a) and (c) must be submitted for new projects entering a PHA's inventory within one year of the applicable Date of Full Availability (DOFA).
( b ) Appeals under § 990.245 (c) and (e) are subject to the following requirements: ( 1 ) The PHA is required to acquire an independent cost assessment of its projects;
( 2 ) The cost of services for the independent cost assessment is to be paid by the appellant PHA;
( 3 ) The assessment is to be reviewed by a professional familiar with property management practices and costs in the region or state in which the appealing PHA is located. This professional is to be procured by HUD. The professional review and recommendation will then be forwarded to the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing (or designee) for final determination; and
( 4 ) If the appeal is granted, the PHA agrees to be bound to the independent cost assessment regardless of new funding levels.
Exhibit 13.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The9 Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jun Zhu, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 28, 2007



|       |  |                                     
|------ |  | ------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Jun Zhu                         
|Name:  |  | Jun Zhu                             
|Title: |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
130 STAT. 1398 PUBLIC LAW 114–271—DEC. 14, 2016 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 2974 (H.R. 5422): 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

Nov. 28, considered and passed Senate. 

Dec. 8, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–271 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To ensure funding for the National Human Trafficking Hotline, and for other 

purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. FUNDING FOR THE NATIONAL HUMAN TRAFFICKING HOTLINE; PERFECTING AMENDMENT. 

(a) HHS FUNDING FOR TRAFFICKING HOTLINE.—Section 

107(b)(1)(B)(ii) of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 

(22 U.S.C. 7105(b)(1)(B)(ii)) is amended by striking ‘‘of amounts 

made available for grants under paragraph (2),’’. 

(b) PERFECTING AMENDMENT.—Section 603 of the Justice for 

Victims of Trafficking Act of 2015 (Public Law 114–22; 129 Stat. 

259) is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking 

‘‘Victims of Crime Trafficking’’ and inserting ‘‘Victims of Trafficking’’. 

(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this Act shall 

take effect as if enacted as part of the Justice for Victims of 

Trafficking Act of 2015 (Public Law 114–22; 129 Stat. 227). 

Approved December 14, 2016. 

22 USC 7105 

note. 

Dec. 14, 2016 

[S. 2974] 


kgrant on DSKB33CYQ1 with PUBLAW
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Stephan Kuppenheimer, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Merrill Lynch
Depositor, Inc., on behalf of PPLUS Trust Series JPM-1;

         2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

         4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement
and based
upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trustee
have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

         5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
compliance by the depositor or trustee with the minimum servicing or similar
standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling
or servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York and
its officers and agents.


Date:  March 29, 2005                                /s/ Stephan Kuppenheimer
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                      President
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas Lovelace, Appellant.

[832 NYS2d 439]—

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), dated May 27, 2005, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court’s determination to designate him a level three sex offender is supported by clear and convincing evidence, including, inter alia, the complainant’s grand jury testimony and other “reliable hearsay evidence” (Correction Law § 168-n [3]; *see People v Davis,*26 AD3d 364 [2006]; *People v Awalt,*17 AD3d 336 [2005]; *People v Thomas,*300 AD2d 379 [2002]). In determining the defendant’s total risk factor score, the Supreme Court was not limited to the single charge of sexual abuse in the first degree to which the defendant pleaded guilty *(see*Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 5 [1997 ed]), but could also consider other relevant facts supported by clear and convincing evidence *(see People v Saleemi,*186 Misc 2d 177, 180 [2000]). Spolzino, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and McCarthy, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2

Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Héctor Alonso, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IMPSAT Fiber Networks,
Inc. (the Registrant);

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
Registrant and we have:

(a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared,

(b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation, and

(c)  disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.     The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information, and

(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting.

|                |  |                                      
|--------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                |  | /s/ Héctor Alonso                    
|                |  |                                      
|August 14, 2003 |  | Héctor Alonso
Chief Financial Officer
8-1

Contributing Authors and Supporting Staff Members

Chapter 8

Contributing Authors and Supporting Staff Members

Allen Adams Physical Scientist

Cheryl Anderson HQ Operations Research Analyst

Ellen Aronson Special Assistant to the Regional Director

Joan Barminski Chief, Production, Development, and Reservoir Analysis

Theresa Bell Petroleum Engineer

Marilyn Bishop Secretary

Boyd Bosserman Cartographic Technician

David Browne Physical Oceanographer

Jason Chau Archaeologist Intern

Michael Else Petroleum Engineer

Mary Elaine Dunaway Biologist

Thomas Dunaway Regional Supervisor, Office of Field Operations

Catherine Dunkel Geologist

Mark Eckenrode Physical Scientist

Deborah Eidson Program Analyst

Janice Hall Technical Information Specialist

Maurice Hill Environmental Coordinator

James Galloway Geologist

James Grant Chief, Plans, Platforms, and Pipelines Section

George Hampton Senior Environmental Scientist

Dirk Herkoff HQ Meteorologist

Catherine Hoffman Petroleum Engineer

Maher Ibrahim, Ph. D. Regional Supervisor, Office of Production, Development,

and Resource Evaluation

Walter Johnson, Ph. D HQ Oceanographer

John Lane Chief, Environmental Analysis Section

Daniel Leedy Fisheries Biologist

James Lima, Ph. D. Social Sciences

Archie Melancon HQ EIS Project Officer

Michael McCrary Wildlife Biologist

Craig Ogawa Geologist

David Panzer Oceanographer

Mark Pierson, Ph. D. Wildlife Biologist

Fred Piltz, Ph. D. Chief, Environmental Studies Section

J. Lisle Reed, Ph. D. Regional Director

Miriam Rose Secretary

Glenn Shackell Petroleum Engineer

Allan Shareghi Geologist

John Smith Physical Scientist

Ralph Snyder Environmental Protection Specialist

Melanie Stright, Ph. D. HQ National Historic Preservation Act Compliance Officer

Harold Syms Supervisory Geologist

Lu Tan Technical Information Specialist
8-2

Delineation Drilling Activities Offshore Santa Barbara County

Lynnette Vesco Deputy Regional Supervisor, Office of Environmental Evaluation

Armen Voskanian Petroleum Engineer

Richard Wilhelmsen Regional Supervisor, Office of Environmental Evaluation

Fredrick White Social Scientist

Elverlene Williams-Flatts Minerals Leasing Specialist

Rochelle Williams Secretary

Judy Wilson HQ Marine Biologist

Steven Wolfson Deputy Regional Supervisor, Office of Field Operations

Frank Victor Geologist