alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Derenzo and Associates, Inc.

Test Times Moisture O 2 CO 2 (EST) (Kw) (bhp) (%) (%) (%) U4-C1 10:11 - 11:58 1,588 2,219 12.2 8.66 11.2 U4-C2 13:03 - 14:11 1584 2,212 12.0 8.63 11.2 U4-C3 15:10 - 16:16 1596 2,229 10.9 8.61 11.2 Average 1,589 2,220 11.7 8.63 11.2 

### NOx

Test Flowrate NOx Instrumental Concentration NOx Corrected

Concentration NOx Emission Rate NOx Emission

Factor ID (dscfm)1 (ppmv) (ppmv) (lb/hr) (g/bhp*hr) U4-C1 4,579 42.36 41.78 1.37 0.28 U4-C2 4,598 41.85 42.48 1.40 0.29 U4-C3 4,596 39.54 40.78 1.34 0.27 Average 4,591 41.25 41.68 1.37 0.28 Permit Limits 2.95 0.60 

### CO

Test Flowrate CO Instrumental Concentration CO

Corrected Concentration CO Emission Rate CO Emission

Factor ID (dscfm)1 (ppmv) (ppmv) (lb/hr) (g/bhp*hr) U4-C1 4,579 649 647 12.93 2.64 U4-C2 4,598 635 626 12.56 2.57 U4-C3 4,596 656 641 12.86 2.62 Average 4,591 12.78 2.61 Permit Limits 13.54 2.75 

### VOC

Test Flowrate THC Corrected Concentration Exhaust Methane

Concentration

2 VOC Emission Rate VOC

Emission Factor ID (scfm)1 (ppmv) (ppmv) (lb/hr) 3 (g/bhp*hr)3 U4-C1 5,208 2,495 2,391 1.35 0.28 U4-C2 5,193 2,567 2,441 1.63 0.33 U4-C3 5,159 2,482 2,412 0.90 0.18 Average 5,187 1.29 0.26 Permit Limits 1.37 0.28

Notes: 1 = Flowrate calculation based on Type S Pitot measurements (USEPA Methods 1 - 4) pre-test and post-test flowrates 2 = Exhaust gas methane concentration (ppmv-wet), as propane 3 = Calculated emission rate derived from in-field, methane resposne factor determination

Definitions: (Kw) = Killowatt (EST) = Eastern Standard Time (bhp) = brake horsepower O 2 = oxygen (g/bhp*hr) = grams per brake horsepower hour CO 2 = carbon dioxide (dscfm) = dry standard cubic feet per minute NOx = oxides of nitrogen (scfm) = standard cubic feet per minute (wet) CO = carbon monoxide (lb/hr) = pounds per hour THC = total hydrocarbons (ppmv) = parts per million by volume - as propane VOC = volatile organic compounds

NOx, CO, and VOC Emission Rate Calculation Formulas: (ft 3 pollutant/100 ft 3 gas) * (lb.mol/385 ft 3 pollutant) * (lb pollutant/lb.mol pollutant) * (exhaust flowrate ft 3 /min) * (60 min/hr) = Emission Rate (lb/hr) (Emission Rate (lb/hr)) (453.6 g/lb) / (bhp) = Emission Factor (g/bhp*hr) Unit #4 Caterpillar Model G3520C Engine

at the

Engine Output Table 4

Osceola Road Solid Waste Facility - Osceola County, Florida

Test Date(s): April 17, 2008 Derenzo and Associates, Inc. Project No.: 0711014

Seminole Energy, L.L.C. Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Monoxide, and Volatile Organic Compound Concentrations, Emission Rates, and Emission Factors

from the
## FILED Oct 24, 2019 01:11 PM(CT)
TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Arthur Walker, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Kings County, rendered September 29, 1959, after a jury trial, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, attempted petit larceny, and assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a third felony offender, to serve a term of 10 to 20 years. Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: CHRISTOPHER PAUL RABALAIS, 

Debtor, 

------------------------------

CHRISTOPHER PAUL RABALAIS, 

Appellant, 

 v. 

SETH LEON, 

Appellee.

No. 21-60025 

BAP No. 20-1216 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel

Gan, Faris, and Lafferty III, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted April 17, 2023**

Before: CLIFTON, R. NELSON, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Christopher Paul Rabalais appeals pro se from the decision of the 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 25 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 21-60025 

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirming the bankruptcy court’s order allowing 

creditor Seth Leon to dismiss voluntarily an adversary proceeding. We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo the bankruptcy court’s 

conclusions of law and for clear error its findings of fact. Decker v. Tramiel (In re 

JTS Corp.), 617 F.3d 1102, 1109 (9th Cir. 2010). We affirm. 

The bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion by allowing Leon to 

dismiss voluntarily his adversary complaint because Rabalais failed to show legal 

prejudice. See Smith v. Lenches, 263 F.3d 972, 975 (9th Cir. 2001) (setting forth 

standard of review and stating a court “should grant a motion for voluntary 

dismissal under Rule 41(a)(2) unless a defendant can show that it will suffer some 

plain legal prejudice as a result.”). 

We reject as meritless Rabalais’s contentions concerning res judicata and 

whether the judgment debt is dischargeable.

AFFIRMED.
#### In the Matter of Anthony U., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[832 NYS2d 806]

Order of dispo*425sition, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma Cordova, J.), entered on or about January 11, 2006, which, after a violation of probation hearing, revoked appellant’s probation and placed him in the custody of the Office of Children and Family Services for a period up to 12 months with authorization for detention in a limited secure facility, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s determination that appellant violated the conditions of his probation to an extent warranting revocation is supported by a preponderance of the evidence *(see Matter of Alpheaus M.,*168 AD2d 208 [1990]). Appellant, who had already violated his probation and received a second chance, failed to comply with his probation conditions, which included reporting to his probation officer, attending school, and cooperating with a rehabilitation program. The record supports the court’s rejection of appellant’s various excuses.

The court’s placement of appellant was a proper exercise of discretion that constituted the least restrictive alternative consistent with the needs of appellant and the community *(see Matter of Katherine W.,*62 NY2d 947 [1984]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Buckley, Gonzalez and Malone, JJ.
### §30105. Restriction on lobbying activities

(a) In General.—No funds appropriated to the Secretary for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration shall be available for any activity specifically designed to urge a State or local legislator to favor or oppose the adoption of any specific legislative proposal pending before any State or local legislative body.

(b) Appearance as Witness Not Barred.—Subsection (a) does not prohibit officers or employees of the United States from testifying before any State or local legislative body in response to the invitation of any member of that legislative body or a State executive office.

(Added and amended Pub. L. 105–178, title VII, §7104(a), (c), June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 466; Pub. L. 105–206, title IX, §9012(a), July 22, 1998, 112 Stat. 864.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 105–178, §7104(c), as added by Pub. L. 105–206, inserted "for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration" after "Secretary".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1998 Amendment

Title IX of Pub. L. 105–206 effective simultaneously with enactment of Pub. L. 105–178 and to be treated as included in Pub. L. 105–178 at time of enactment, and provisions of Pub. L. 105–178, as in effect on day before July 22, 1998, that are amended by title IX of Pub. L. 105–206 to be treated as not enacted, see section 9016 of Pub. L. 105–206, set out as a note under section 101 of Title 23, Highways.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCyclic Oxidation and Hot Corrosion of NiCrY-Coated Disk SuperalloysPowder metallurgy disk superalloys have been designed for higher engine operating temperatures through improvement of their strength and creep resistance. Yet, increasing disk application temperatures to 704 degrees Centigrade and higher could enhance oxidation and activate hot corrosion in harmful environments. Protective coatings could be necessary to mitigate such attack. Cylindrical coated specimens of disk superalloys LSHR and ME3 were subjected to thermal cycling to produce cyclic oxidation in air at a maximum temperature of 760  degrees Centigrade. The effects of substrate roughness and coating thickness on coating integrity after cyclic oxidation were considered. Selected coated samples that had cyclic oxidation were then subjected to accelerated hot corrosion tests. This cyclic oxidation did not impair the coating's resistance to subsequent hot corrosion pitting attack.Document ID20160007899Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsGabb, Timothy P.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Miller, Robert A.*(Vantage Partners, LLC Brook Park, OH, United States)*Sudbrack, Chantal K.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Draper, Susan L.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Nesbitt, James A.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Rogers, Richard B.*(Stinger Ghaffarian Technologies, Inc. Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Telesman, Ignacy*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Ngo, Vanda*(Arizona Univ. Tucson, AZ, United States)*Healy, Jonathan*(Vantage Partners, LLC Brook Park, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredJune 24, 2016Publication DateJune 1, 2016Subject CategoryMetals And Metallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2016-219105E-19229GRC-E-DAA-TN31568Meeting InformationMeeting: Materials Science and Technology 2015Location: Columbus, OHCountry: United StatesStart Date: October 4, 2015End Date: October 8, 2015Sponsors:American Ceramic Society,Association for Iron and Steel Technology (AIST),ASM International,Minerals, Metals and Materials SocietyFunding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NNX13AJ46AWBS: WBS 081876.02.03.04.02.01CONTRACT_GRANT: NNC12BA01BDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Keywordsprotective coatingsuperalloyresidual crackingAvailable DownloadsNameType20160007899.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §1413. Completion of proof on death of discoverer

If the discoverer dies before perfecting proof of discovery or fully complying with the provisions of section 1412 of this title, his widow, heir, executor, or administrator shall be entitled to the benefits of such discovery, upon complying with the provisions of this chapter. Nothing herein shall be held to impair any rights of discovery or any assignment by a discoverer recognized prior to April 2, 1872, by the United States.

(R.S. §5572.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §5572 derived from act Apr. 2, 1872, ch. 81, §1, 17 Stat. 48.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6034

ROBERT LEE TRENT, Petitioner - Appellant, versus PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-753-5-FL) Submitted: May 19, 2005 Decided: May 24, 2005 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lee Trent, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).PER CURIAM: Robert Lee Trent seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief in part on his petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) and dismissing without prejudice in part for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Trent v. Stansberry , No. CA-04-753-5-FL (E.D.N.C. filed Dec. 6, 2004; entered Dec. 16, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 4.3**

**China Finance Online Co. Limited’s 2009 Annual General Meeting**

**as apublicly traded company**

**was held in Beijing at 10:00 am (Beijing time) on June 30, 2009**

Meeting address: 9th Floor of Tower C, Corporate Square, No. 35 Financial Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100140, China 

At this annual general meeting of shareholders (the “Meeting”) of China Finance Online Co. Limited (the “Company”), five proposalswere submitted. 

The results of this Meeting are as follows: 

1. Mr. Hugo Shong and Mr. Ling Wang were re-elected as directors of the Company. 

2.The shareholders approved the re-appointment of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA Ltd. as independent auditors of the Company for a term ending on the date of the next annual general meeting of shareholders to be held in 2010 and authorized the board ofdirectors to determine their remuneration. 

3. The shareholders approved the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company for thefiscal year ended on or as of December 31, 2008 together with the Reports of the Directors and the Auditors thereon as required by Hong Kong law. 

4. The shareholders authorized the board of directors during the next year to issue ordinary shares or preference shares upon such terms and conditions as the board of directors, in its discretion, shalldetermine. 

5. The shareholders approved the increase in the number of ordinary shares available for issuance under the 2004 Stock IncentivePlan by 3,000,000 ordinary shares, representing 2.73% of the outstanding ordinary shares of the Company as of December 31, 2008.
Court of Appeals

Twelfth Court of Appeals District at Tyler

BILL OF COSTS

Court of Appeals No. 12-15-00090-CV

Trial Court No. 349-7331

George A. Hall

Vs.

The County of Anderson

DOCUMENTS FILED AMOUNT FEE PAID BY

Clerk's record

Indigent

Required Texas.gov efiling fee

Supreme Court chapter 51 fee

Filing

$33.00

$25.00

$20.00

$50.00

$100.00

Unknown

Dismissed, not paid

Dismissed, not paid

Dismissed, not paid

Dismissed, not paid

TOTAL: $228.00

I, Cathy S. Lusk, Clerk of the Court of Appeals, Twelfth Court of Appeals District at Tyler,

Texas, certify that the above copy of the Bill of Costs is true and correct. GIVEN UNDER MY

HAND AND SEAL OF SAID COURT, at Tyler, this 24th day of August 2015, A.D.

CATHY LUSK, CLERK

By:_____________________________

Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
NATIONAL OCEAN SURVEY
HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY INDEX

BATHYMETRIC CONTOUR INTERVALS: 10 METERS TO MAXIMUM DEPTH,
SUPPLEMENTED BY 2 METER INTERVALS.

DATUM IS MEAN LOWER LOW WATER

SYMBOLLGY
% Rocks

+ LIGHT

20 Low WATER

123%00"

123°00",

A5g—

CHEHALIS RIVER WASH

#52

eUGZ0 EaENTIN At

oO.
ly |
510 oD |
oT oO}
sr UE
8 |
ae
ale Z
fa} 3
ipP z
. Cc
28S
mie wD |
2g 2
3) |
| |
g {
é go)
3 aoe
s| @ S
o» ai
~ Z|
© 6)
82
i; “ EI
2 8 Z
‘| @ By
aa
g |
$s _.|
oe
5
3 Qo
8 wo
|
2 3
3 a
z
_ Cc
3 <=
a ie)
z a
g |
2 |
### §21107. Maximum duty hours and subjects of collective bargaining

The number of hours established by this chapter that an employee may be required or allowed to be on duty is the maximum number of hours consistent with safety. Shorter hours of service and time on duty of an employee are proper subjects for collective bargaining between a railroad carrier and its employees.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 891.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21107 | 45:63a(d) (related to 45:64). | Mar. 4, 1907, ch. 2939, 34 Stat. 1415, §3A(d) (related to §4); added July 8, 1976, Pub. L. 94–348, §4(d), 90 Stat. 819; June 22, 1988, Pub. L. 100–342, §16(4), 102 Stat. 635. |
| | 45:64. | Mar. 4, 1907, ch. 2939, §4, 34 Stat. 1417; restated Dec. 26, 1969, Pub. L. 91–169, §1, 83 Stat. 464; June 22, 1988, Pub. L. 100–342, §16(5), 102 Stat. 635. |

Section
Exhibit 99.1

 

**FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE**

 

**June 9, 2008**

 

For information, contact:

Bruce Broquet, GCI (907) 868-6660 or bbroquet@gci.com

Greg Chapados, GCI (907) 317-0090 or gchapados@gci.com   

David Morris, GCI (907) 265-5396 or dmorris@gci.com

 

**GCI COMPLETES PURCHASE OF COMMUNICATIONS SUBSIDIARIES**

**OF UNITED COMPANIES, INC.**

 

*Purchase to Accelerate Rollout of Mobile Wireless Service in Rural Alaska and Enhance Telemedicine and Distance Learning*

 

**ANCHORAGE** – GCI (NASDAQ:GNCMA) announced today the completion of its acquisition of the communication subsidiaries of United Companies, Inc., a holding company owned by Sea Lion Corporation and Togiak Natives Limited, the Alaska Native village corporations for Hooper Bay and Togiak. The acquisition was completed on June 3, 2008.

 

Under terms of the acquisition, GCI paid approximately $42 million in cash (including certain transaction costs) for the stock of:

 

|   | **•** | United Utilities, Inc. (UUI), which together with its subsidiary, United-KUC, provides local telephone service to 60 rural Alaska communities. |
|--------|------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | **•** | Unicom, which operates DeltaNet, a long-haul broadband microwave network ringing the 30,000-square-mile Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta (Y-K Delta) in southwest Alaska.  By the end of this year, DeltaNet will link more than 40 villages to the regional center of Bethel. |
|--------|------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

As of the completion date, the acquired companies had combined net debt of approximately $35 million.

 

“The acquisition of UUI and Unicom marks another step forward in GCI’s plan to become the first full-service, statewide provider of communications services in Alaska,” said Ron Duncan, GCI president. “The acquisition will accelerate our rural wireless deployment, which will bring mobile voice/broadband wireless services to 200 rural towns and villages over the next three years. GCI is proud to welcome all of the employees of UUI and Unicom to the GCI family.”

 

GCI’s Managed Broadband Services division will use DeltaNet to immediately expand healthcare and educational opportunities for all residents of 

 

----
#### In the Matter of Gary L. Silvernail, Appellant, v Frank A. Rago et al., Constituting the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Onondaga, Respondents.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs, without prejudice to a new application showing elimination of objectionable conditions. Memorandum: Special Term dismissed the petition for annulment of the determination of the zoning board of appeals denying petitioner’s application for a special exception permit to use his 31.4 acre parcel of land for public riding stables. The board made several findings or reasons for its action, including that petitioner’s corral generates noise, dirt and odors and in wet seasons the runoff therefrom pollutes private wells used for water supply in the area, and that petitioner has offered no plan to obviate such conditions. Findings in support of zoning board action must, of course, be supported by facts in the record *(Matter of T. J. R. Enterprises v Town Bd. of Town Southeast,*50 AD2d 836). Although petitioner contends that this record does not support the board’s findings, the minutes of the hearing show that three witnesses gave testimony supporting the findings. The ordinance in this case provides for the issuance of special exception use permits of the character sought by petitioner in this residential district, and so respondents were required to grant the permit unless they had reasonable grounds for denying it *(Matter of Pleasant Val. Home Constr.*v *Van Wagner,*41 NY2d 1028; *Matter of North Shore Steak House v Board of Appeals of Inc. Vil. of Thomaston,*30 NY2d 238, 243-245). The determination of the facts is for the administrative body and not for the courts *(Matter of Lemir Realty Corp. v Larkin,*11 NY2d 20, 25); and since there are facts in the record to support the board’s determination, Special Term properly dismissed the petition *(Matter of Tandem Holding Corp. v Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Hempstead,*43 NY2d 801; *Matter of Mobil Oil Corp. v Oaks,*55 AD2d 809; *Matter of C & G Developers v Granito,*53 AD2d 612). (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga Supreme Court—art 78.) Present —Marsh, P. J., Dillon, Hancock, Jr., Denman and Witmer, JJ.
****

**Biomedical Imaging and Biomechanics**
Images are an important part of biomedical knowledge.  New  computational technologies provide theopportunity to supplement  traditional two-dimensional biological and medical images with  dynamicthree-dimensional images that can be viewed, rotated, and  reversibly dissected in a manner analogousto the physical objects  they represent. 
***Visible Human Project*
NIH/NLM is building and evaluating digital image libraries of human  anatomy.  Full use andunderstanding of the anatomical structures  depicted in such libraries require the integration of HPCC technologies with technologies used in medical imaging systems  including computed tomography (CT)and magnetic resonance imaging  (MRI).  Combining this library with efficient rendering algorithms will provide new educational tools for researchers, healthcare  providers, students, and the generalpublic.  NIH/NLM is working with  industry and academia to encourage the development of  interoperablemethods for representing and communicating such  electronic images. 
The Visible Human Data Set consists of images from a male and a  female cadaver.  The data set derivedfrom the male cadaver was  completed in November 1994 and made available both by Internet ftp  (filetransfer protocol) and DAT tape; NCAR assisted in distributing  the data set.  The size of the maledata set is about 15 GB.  More  than 150 non-financial license agreements to access the data set  havebeen signed by government, commercial, and academic  organizations.  Proposed applications includemultimedia  educational materials for educational levels from K through post- graduate medicaleducation and home education, virtual reality  programs includng surgical simulators, and modelingapplications. 
The data set from the female cadaver, which is expected to become  available early in FY 1996, will bemore detailed than the male. 
In order to facilitate retrieval, methods need to be developed to link  image data to symbolictext-based data that includes names,  hierarchies, principles, and theories.  Basic research is neededin the  description and representation of structures and the connection of  structural-anatomical tofunctional-physiological knowledge.  The  long-term project goal is to link the print library offunctional- physiological knowledge with the image library of structural- anatomical knowledgetransparently into one unified resource of  health sciences information. 
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/extramural_research.dir/visible_human.html**