alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1617. United States attorney; appointment; duties

The President shall, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, appoint a United States attorney for the Virgin Islands to whose office the provisions of chapter 35 of title 28, shall apply. Except as otherwise provided by law it shall be the duty of the United States attorney to prosecute all offenses against the United States and to conduct all legal proceedings, civil and criminal, to which the Government of the United States is a party in the district court and in the courts established by local law. He shall also prosecute in the district court in the name of the government of the Virgin Islands all offenses against the laws of the Virgin Islands which are cognizable by that court unless, at his request or with his consent, the prosecution of any such case is conducted by the attorney general of the Virgin Islands. The United States attorney may, when requested by the Governor or the attorney general of the Virgin Islands, conduct any other legal proceedings to which the government of the Virgin Islands is a party in the district court or the courts established by local law.

(July 22, 1954, ch. 558, §27, 68 Stat. 507; Pub. L. 85–851, §9, Aug. 28, 1958, 72 Stat. 1095; Pub. L. 86–289, §4, Sept. 16, 1959, 73 Stat. 569; Pub. L. 92–24, June 2, 1971, 85 Stat. 76; Pub. L. 98–454, title VII, §708, Oct. 5, 1984, 98 Stat. 1741.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–454 substituted "courts established by local law" for "inferior courts of the Virgin Islands" wherever appearing and struck out provisions relating to vacancies in the office of United States attorney for the Virgin Islands.

1971—Pub. L. 92–24 substituted "chapter 35" for "chapter 31" and struck out "except that the Attorney General shall not appoint more than one assistant United States attorney for the Virgin Islands" after "shall apply".

1959—Pub. L. 86–289 substituted provisions making chapter 31 of title 28 applicable to United States attorney and by provisions specifying his duties, for provisions which prescribed his term of office and provided for his compensation, provided for appointment and compensation of his assistant and employees, and provided that he or his assistant conduct all legal proceedings in which the United States Government or the government of the Virgin Islands is a party in the District Court and inferior courts.

1958—Pub. L. 85–851 substituted "United States attorney" for "district attorney" wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–454 effective on ninetieth day following Oct. 5, 1984, see section 1005 of Pub. L. 98–454, set out as a note under section 1424 of this title.
Exhibit 23.1
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

---

# Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statement No. 333-132998 of CommunitySouth Bancshares, Inc. on
Form S-8, pertaining to the CommunitySouth Bancshares, Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, of
our report, dated March 27, 2007, that is incorporated by reference in the Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB of CommunitySouth Bancshares, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.

/s/ Elliott Davis, LLC

Greenville, South Carolina March 27, 2007
#### Marian E. McLaughlin, Individually and as Executrix of D. Humes McLaughlin, Deceased, Respondent, v. 254 Holding Corporation et al., Appellants.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $.10 costs, unless the appellants argue or submit the appeal during the January 1961 Term of this court. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, Judicial Conference of the United States.

# ACTION:

Notice of Cancellation of Open Hearing.

# SUMMARY:

The following remote public hearing on proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure has been canceled: Bankruptcy Rules Hearing on January 7, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Secretary, Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Judicial Conference of the United States, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus Circle NE, Suite 7-300, Washington, DC 20544, Telephone (202) 502-1820,                         *RulesCommittee_Secretary@ao.uscourts.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Announcements for this hearing were previously published in 85 FR 48562.

Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073.

Dated: December 8, 2020.

Rebecca A. Womeldorf,

Chief Counsel, Rules Committee Staff.

[FR Doc. 2020-27279 Filed 12-10-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
#### Mary E. Wenzel et al., Appellants, v. Melodee Lane Lingerie, Inc., Respondent.

Order dated May 4, 1960, denying plaintiff’s motion to take testimony of Service Window Cleaning Co., Inc., as a hostile witness, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Yalente and Bergan, JJ.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTwo-Step Multi-Physics Analysis of an Annular Linear Induction Pump for Fission Power SystemsOne of the key technologies associated with fission power systems (FPS) is the annular linear induction pump (ALIP). ALIPs are used to circulate liquid-metal fluid for transporting thermal energy from the nuclear reactor to the power conversion device. ALIPs designed and built to date for FPS project applications have not performed up to expectations. A unique, two-step approach was taken toward the multi-physics examination of an ALIP using ANSYS Maxwell 3D and Fluent. This multi-physics approach was developed so that engineers could investigate design variations that might improve pump performance. Of interest was to determine if simple geometric modifications could be made to the ALIP components with the goal of increasing the Lorentz forces acting on the liquid-metal fluid, which in turn would increase pumping capacity. The multi-physics model first calculates the Lorentz forces acting on the liquid metal fluid in the ALIP annulus. These forces are then used in a computational fluid dynamics simulation as (a) internal boundary conditions and (b) source functions in the momentum equations within the Navier-Stokes equations. The end result of the two-step analysis is a predicted pump pressure rise that can be compared with experimental data.Document ID20160014541Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsGeng, Steven M.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Reid, Terry V.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredDecember 7, 2016Publication DateNovember 1, 2016Subject CategoryEngineering (General)Report/Patent NumberE-19277AIAA Paper 2016-5013NASA/TM-2016-219157GRC-E-DAA-TN34742Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 138494.04.18.01.01.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.KeywordsFission Power SystemsFluid DynamicsInduction PumpAvailable DownloadsNameType20160014541.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle20170000670See AlsoTwo-Step Multi-Physics Analysis of an Annular Linear Induction Pump for Fission Power Systemsvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
TS- EMLA50 /60/70/80

Attachment # 8

Pt. 2, Sec. B, End

Worker /Occupational Exposure and Environmental Release Information on the New

Chemical Substance at Industrial Sites Controlled by Others
### FERROVIA **L AG**  **ROMA N, US Corp** 

North America Headquarters 9600 Great Hills Trail, Suite 200 E Austin, TX 78759 Phone (214) 531

- 2863 Attn: Pascual Pla Email: pplagomis@ferrovial.us

March 3, 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations 1200 Ne w Jersey Ave, SE Wa shington DC, 20590

To Wh om It May Concern

, Ferrovial Agroman US Corp has proudly been issued an exemption, Regulatory Docket No FAA

- 2015

- 192 2 and exemption numbered 13669 for the purpose of aerial photography, video and survey . Ferrovial Agroman US Corp hereby respectfully requests an amendment to the exemption to allow two additional type s of unmanned aircraft system s (UAS) that fully comply with the conditions of the Exemption.

Ferrovial Agroman US Corp wis hes to additi onally operate a n Ebee RTK drone ma nufactured by SenseFly, as well as the Trimble UX5 HP under the s am e terms and condit ions contained in the Exemption . All operations of the additional UAS ’ will be in full compliance with the terms of the Exemption.

These survey grade mapping drone s will add additional resource s to Ferrovial Agroman US Corp allowing us to expand our capacity to get the job done. As this is an amendment to an existing exemption asking only for the addition of two ty pe s of unmanned ae rial systems

, Ferrovial Agroman US Corp respectfully submits that good cause exists so that notice does not need to be published in the Federal Register for the requested amendment.

Please feel free to contact me should you have any question or conce rns concerning this request for an amendment to the Exemption.

Sincerely,

Pascual Pla Ferrovial Agroman US Corp. North America Headquarters 9600 Great Hills, Suite 200 E Austin, TX 78759 214.531.2863 phone fax
#### § 990.275 Project-based management (PBM).

PBM is the provision of property-based management services that is tailored to the unique needs of each property, given the resources available to that property. These property management services include, but are not limited to, marketing, leasing, resident services, routine and preventive maintenance, lease enforcement, protective services, and other tasks associated with the day-to-day operation of rental housing at the project level. Under PBM, these property management services are arranged, coordinated, or overseen by management personnel who have been assigned responsibility for the day-to-day operation of that property and who are charged with direct oversight of operations of that property. Property management services may be arranged or provided centrally; however, in those cases in which property management services are arranged or provided centrally, the arrangement or provision of these services must be done in the best interests of the property, considering such factors as cost and responsiveness.
**Fiscal      Year 2007 Annual Incentive Plan Criteria**

| Level  | Target                Award Percentage |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   |                                   |
| CEO    | 110%                                   |
| 13     | 95%                                    |
| 12     | 75%                                    |
| 11     | 65%                                    |

| Level                           | Corporate                / Business Unit Weight |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                            |                                            |
| CEO                and Level 13 | 100%                / 0%                        |
| 11-12                           | 80%                / 20%                        |

| Payout                Multiple of Target Award Percentage                                          |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                               |
| Threshold                                         25% |
| Target                   100%                                                       |
| Distinguished                  150%                                                      |
| Super-Distinguished                   200%                                          |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jeremiah Flynn, Appellant.

[831 NYS2d 911]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated March 8, 2004 *(People v Flynn,*5 AD3d 503 [2004]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered July 22, 2002.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Mastro, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
### §322. Exchanging radio communications between land and ship stations and from ship to ship

Every land station open to general public service between the coast and vessels or aircraft at sea shall, within the scope of its normal operations, be bound to exchange radio communications or signals with any ship or aircraft station at sea; and each station on shipboard or aircraft at sea shall, within the scope of its normal operations, be bound to exchange radio communications or signals with any other station on shipboard or aircraft at sea or with any land station open to general public service between the coast and vessels or aircraft at sea: Provided, That such exchange of radio communication shall be without distinction as to radio systems or instruments adopted by each station.

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title III, §322, 48 Stat. 1090; May 20, 1937, ch. 229, §8, 50 Stat. 191.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1937—Act May 20, 1937, provided for radio communications with aircraft stations.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 238 (Thursday, December 10, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 79495-79496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27160]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4562-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2020-0001]


Oregon; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Oregon (FEMA-4562-DR), dated September 15, 2020, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued November 16, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective November 3, 2020.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034,

[[Page 79496]]

Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals 
and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Pete Gaynor,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2020-27160 Filed 12-9-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
### SUBCHAPTER III—WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION PROGRAM
#### § 1241.8 How will DCHD conduct the hearing on the record?

If you request a hearing on the record under § 1241.7, an ALJ will conduct the hearing under the provisions of 43 CFR 4.420 through 4.438, except when the provisions are inconsistent with the provisions of this part. We have the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, the fact of the violation and the basis for the amount of the civil penalty. Upon completion of the hearing, the ALJ will issue a decision according to the evidence presented and the applicable law.
Motion Granted; Order filed December 16, 2014 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00725-CR

____________

DWAYNE DIXON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 183rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1399246

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the 

appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. On December 3, 2014, appellant 

filed a motion requesting an extension of time to file a pro se brief. See Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1969). The motion is granted.
Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 183rd District Court to afford 

appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local 

procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before

January 6, 2015; that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which 

delivery of the record to appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief 

with this court within thirty days of that date.

PER CURIAM
#### Gothar Allgemeine Versicherung A. G., Appellant, v. A/S Santa Martha et al., Defendants, and Black Diamond Steamship Corporation et al., Respondents. (And Eight Other Actions.)

Order, entered on July 11, 1960, denying plaintiff’s motion for a separate trial, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents, without prejudice to an application to the Justice presiding at the trial for a separate trial on any of the issues or groups of issues or with respect to different classes of plaintiffs. This application for a separate trial was prematurely made. It does not appear that all of the pretrial procedures have been completed. Whether there should or should not be a separate trial with respect to the issue proposed by the plaintiffs can better he determined after the completion of such pretrial procedures. In affirming we do not necessarily hold that there be no separate trial of any of the issues presented. After they have been more clearly defined through the completion of the pretrial procedures the Trial Justice may then deem it advisable, in the exercise of discretion, to segregate for separate trial some of the issues or groups of issues or to segregate for separate trial different classes of plaintiffs. Likewise, it might he deemed advisable in the interest of simplification and clarity to require the jury to bring in special verdicts with respect to some phases of the case. It would therefore be desirable to reserve for the *918trial court the right to pass upon requests such as these and those of a similar nature. It may well be that at a pretrial conference conducted pursuant to rule IX of the New York County Supreme Court Trial Term Rules, trial procedures can be formulated that would lead to a simplification and limitation of the issues in accordance with the objectives of that rule. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Bastow, JJ.
### Meeker and Loyd Sandstone Members of the Mancos Shale, Moffat and Rio Blanco Counties, Colorado

By: John R. DyniHenry L. Cullins

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1194J

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (580 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.