alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 347 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 347

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the credit 
   for adoption expenses shall be permanent and to repeal the 5-year 
             limitation on carryforwards of unused credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 2005

  Mr. Platts introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the credit 
   for adoption expenses shall be permanent and to repeal the 5-year 
             limitation on carryforwards of unused credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADOPTION EXPENSE CREDIT MADE PERMANENT; REPEAL OF 
              CARRYFORWARD LIMIT.

    (a) Credit Made Permanent.--Title IX of the Economic Growth and Tax 
Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 shall not apply to the amendments 
made by section 202 of such Act.
    (b) Repeal of Carryforward Limit.--
            (1) In general.--Subsection (c) of section 23 of such Code 
        is amended by striking the last 2 sentences.
            (2) Effective date.--The amendment made by paragraph (1) 
        shall apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATIONS
          5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financing reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Joseph Y. LiuJoseph Y. LiuPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Laurence F. Padway, #89314

Law Offices of Laurence F. Padway

1516 Oak Street, Suite 109

Alameda, California 94501

Telephone: (510)814-0680

Facsimile : (510)814-0650

Attorneys for plaintiff

Marylyn Beaver

SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP

REBECCA A. HULL Bar No. 99802

MICHELLE Y. MCISAAC Bar No. 215294

rebecca.hull@sdma.com

michelle.mcisaac@sdma.com

One Market Plaza

Steuart Tower, 8th Floor

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 781-7900

Facsimile: (415) 781-2635

Attorneys for Defendants

Bank of the West Welfare Benefits Plan and

Bancwest Corporation Welfare Benefit Plan; 

and Real Party in Interest Metropolitan Life

Insurance Company

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARYLYN BEAVER, No. C09-02177 WHA

Plaintiff,

vs. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER RE DISMISSAL

BANK OF THE WEST

WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN, and

BANCWEST CORPORATION 

WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN, 

Defendants. Hon. William H. Alsup

______________________________/

METROPOLITAN LIFE 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Real Parties in Interest.

______________________________/

Case 3:09-cv-02177-WHA Document 66 Filed 08/05/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:09-cv-02177-WHA Document65 Filed08/05/10 Page1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Whereas, settlement in the above matter has been reached. The parties, by and through their

respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree that the above named action be dismissed,

with prejudice and in its entirety as to each party and Real Party in Interest, with each party to be

responsible for their own attorney's fees and costs.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: August 5, 2010

/s/_________________ /s/ ________________

Laurence F. Padway Rebecca A. Hull

Attorney for plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant and Real

Party in Interest

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED that this matter is dismissed with

prejudice as to all parties, all real parties in interest, and all claims for relief, each party to be

responsible for their own attorney's fees and costs.

Date: By: 

Honorable William H. Alsup

United States District Court Judge

Case3:09-cv-02177-WHA Document65 Filed08/05/10 Page2 of 2

August 5, 2010. THE CLERK SHALL CLOSE THE FILE.

Case 3:09-cv-02177-WHA Document 66 Filed 08/05/10 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit32.1

Certification Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002

In connection with the annual report of Ames TrueTemper, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended October 1, 2005, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the‘‘Report’’), I, Richard Dell, the Presidentand Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|  |           |                                                                                                                                    |
|--|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (i)  | The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |

|  |            |                                                                                                                                                    |
|--|------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (ii)  | The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. |

Date: December 22,2005

/s/ RichardDell            Richard DellChief ExecutiveOfficer(Principal ExecutiveOfficer)

----
##### 



Restricted Stock Agreement
 MARINER ENERGY, INC.
AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
 Employee:Date of Grant:RS Grant Number:Number of Restricted Shares Granted:
 Notice of Grant
 Vesting of Restricted Stock
  Disability
 Death
 By the Company other than for Cause




---



##### 



Termination for Cause or other than for Good Reason
 For Good Reason
 Change of Control
   th
 -2-




---



##### 



Book Entry
 Nontransferability of Restricted Stock
 Entire Agreement; Governing Law
 Withholding of Tax
 Amendment
 Status of Stock
 -3-




---



##### 



General
 MARINER ENERGY, INC.By:Name:Title:[NAME]Signature
 -4-
### §2152. Intervention in litigation

#### (a) Intervention

The Oversight Board may intervene in any litigation filed against the territorial government.

#### (b) Injunctive relief

#### (1) In general

If the Oversight Board intervenes in a litigation under subsection (a), the Oversight Board may seek injunctive relief, including a stay of litigation.

#### (2) No independent basis for relief

This section does not create an independent basis on which injunctive relief, including a stay of litigation, may be granted.

(Pub. L. 114–187, title II, §212, June 30, 2016, 130 Stat. 577.)
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.286 What is a DWOP? ( a ) A DWOP is a plan that provides sufficient information for BSEE to review a deepwater development project, and any other project that uses non-conventional production or completion technology, from a total system approach. The DWOP does not replace, but supplements other submittals required by the regulations such as BOEM Exploration Plans, Development and Production Plans, and Development Operations Coordination Documents. BSEE will use the information in your DWOP to determine whether the project will be developed in an acceptable manner, particularly with respect to operational safety and environmental protection issues involved with non-conventional production or completion technology.
( b ) The DWOP process consists of two parts: a Conceptual Plan and the DWOP. Section 250.289 prescribes what the Conceptual Plan must contain, and § 250.292 prescribes what the DWOP must contain.
[Cite as State ex rel. Willis v. Russo , 2012-Ohio-2215.] 

# Court of Appeals of Ohio

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 97818



## STATE EX REL. RONALD WILLIS

RELATOR

vs.


## JUDGE JOHN J. RUSSO

RESPONDENT



### JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED

Writ of Mandamus Motion No. 451532

Order No. 454870

RELEASE DATE: May 15, 2012FOR RELATOR

Ronald Willis, Pro Se No. A-520-629 1150 N. Main Street Mansfield, Ohio 44901

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT

William D. Mason, Esq. Cuyahoga County Prosecutor By: James E. Moss, Esq. Assistant County Prosecutor 9 th Floor, Justice Center 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, J.:

{¶1} Relator, Ronald Willis, requests that this court compel respondent judge to

rule on his motion for jail-time credit filed in State v. Willis , Cuyahoga C.P. Nos.

CR-493477, CR-494145, and CR-517491 on July 11, 2011.

{¶2} Respondent has filed a motion for summary judgment attached to which are

copies of journal entries issued by respondent and received for filing by the clerk on

January 13, 2012 in which respondent granted relator a total of 90 days jail-time credit.

Willis has opposed the motion and challenges the number of days jail-time credit.

{¶3} Respondent argues that this action in mandamus is moot. We agree.

Willis has or had an adequate remedy by way of appeal to challenge the number of days.

See, e.g.
, State ex rel. Menefee v. Burnside , 8th Dist. No. 95747, 2010-Ohio-6034.

{¶4} Accordingly, respondent’s motion for summary judgment is granted.

Relator to pay costs. The clerk is directed to serve upon the parties notice of this

judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ.R. 58(B).

{¶5} Writ denied

.

KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, JUDGE

PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, A.J., andSEAN C. GALLAGHER, J., CONCUR
TS-EMLA50/60/70/80

Attachment #9 

Pt. 2, Sec. B 

Additional Information on the Absence of Tank Truck Cleaning Operations at Road 

Construction Sites
### §1422a. Removal of Governor, Lieutenant Governor, or member of legislature; referendum election

(a) The people of Guam shall have the right of initiative and referendum, to be exercised under conditions and procedures specified in the laws of Guam.

(b) Any Governor, Lieutenant Governor, or member of the legislature of Guam may be removed from office by a referendum election in which at least two-thirds of the number of persons voting for such official in the last preceding general election at which such official was elected vote in favor of recall and in which those so voting constitute a majority of all those participating in such referendum election. The referendum election shall be initiated by the legislature of Guam following (a) a two-thirds vote of the members of the legislature in favor of a referendum, or (b) petition for such a referendum to the legislature by registered voters equal in number to at least 50 per centum of the whole number of votes cast at the last general election at which such official was elected preceding the filing of the petition.

(Aug. 1, 1950, ch. 512, §7, 64 Stat. 387; Pub. L. 90–497, §2, Sept. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 844; Pub. L. 97–357, title I, §101, Oct. 19, 1982, 96 Stat. 1705.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1982—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97–357 added subsec. (a).

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 97–357 redesignated existing provisions as subsec. (b) and inserted provisions relating to the removal of a Lieutenant Governor or member of the legislature of Guam.

1968—Pub. L. 90–497 substituted provisions for the removal of the Governor of Guam through a referendum election for provisions for the appointment, tenure, powers, and duties of the Secretary of Guam.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1968 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 90–497 necessary to authorize the holding of an election for Governor and Lieutenant Governor on Nov. 3, 1970, effective Jan. 1, 1970, and all other amendments unless otherwise provided effective Jan. 4, 1971, see section 13 of Pub. L. 90–497, set out as a note under section 1422 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alfred R. Vondell, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Essex County, rendered July 11, 1977, convicting defendant, on his plea of guilty, of burglary in the third degree. Although charged with several crimes, defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of burglary in the third degree in full satisfaction of all other charges pending against him. Defendant’s plea followed plea-bargaining negotiations and he was sentenced on the same day of his conviction to an indeterminate term of imprisonment with a maximum of four years. This appeal ensued. Defendant contends that the court improperly pronounced sentence without asking him whether he desired an adjournment. CPL 380.30 (subd 3) provides that a court may not pronounce sentence at the time the conviction is entered without inquiring as to whether an adjournment is desired by the defendant. While it is apparent from a reading of the record that plea negotiations had taken place, thére is no provision in CPL 380.30 (subd 3) that a defendant waives his right to seek an adjournment by entering into a plea-bargaining agreement. Nor does the fact that the granting of such an adjournment is discretionary deprive defendant of his statutory right to be questioned as to his desire for an adjournment. Consequently, it is the opinion of this court that defendant should be resentenced after compliance with the statute (cf. *People v Smith,*49 AD2d 651). In view of this determination we need not now consider *1101defendant’s remaining contention that the sentence imposed was excessive and an abuse of discretion. Judgment modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence; matter remitted for resentencing in compliance with CPL 380.30 (subd 3), and, as so modified, affirmed. Greenblott, J. P., Sweeney, Main, Larkin and Mikoll, JJ., concur.
#### MOORE v. NAUGHTON.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 16, 1903.)

Action by Charles J. Moore against Bernard Naughton.

No opinion. Motion granted, so far as to dismiss appeal, with $10 costs.
§ 1220.030 Maintenance of records. ( a ) Each lessee subject to this part 1220 shall establish and maintain such records as are necessary to determine for each NPSL: ( 1 ) The volume and disposition of all oil and gas production saved, removed or sold for each month;
( 2 ) The value of all oil and gas production saved, removed or sold for each month;
( 3 ) The amount and description of costs and credits to the NPSL capital account;
( 4 ) The amount and description of all costs of acquisition, construction, and operation of equipment and facilities furnished by the lessee and charged to the NPSL capital account under § 1220.011(g). Such records shall include worksheets or other documents that indicate the method used to calculate the amount of each charge made under § 1220.011(g);
( 5 ) The cumulative balance of costs and credits to the NPSL capital account; and
( 6 ) The inventory of materiel.
( b ) The ledger cards showing the charges and credits to the NPSL capital account shall be maintained until thirty-six months after the cessation of NPSL operations by the lessee. All other documents, journals and records shall be maintained for thirty-six months from the due date or date of mailing of the statement of account on an NPSL, whichever comes later, except that nothing in these regulations shall limit the time of investigation or the need to produce records when prima facie evidence of fraud or willful misconduct is obtained with respect to the government's interest in the NPSL.
[45 FR 36800, May 30, 1980, as amended at 75 FR 61087, Oct. 4, 2010]
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Paul G. Anderson, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of FCStone Group, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|    |  |                                                                       
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/    PAUL G. ANDERSON                                               
|    |  | Paul G. Anderson Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)



Date:
November 14, 2008
Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), Joseph Y.Liu, Chief Executive Officer of Oplink Communications, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that,to the best of his knowledge:**1.**The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, to whichthis Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and**2.**The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition at the end of the period covered by the Quarterly Report and results ofoperations of the Company for the periods covered by the Quarterly Report.**In Witness Whereof,**the undersigned has set his hands hereto as of the 9th day of November, 2007.        /s/ Joseph Y. Liu   Joseph Y. Liu   Chief Executive Officer    This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SECand is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Actof 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing.
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1633 Production measurement. ( a ) *General.* Measurement equipment and security procedures shall be designed, installed, used, maintained, and tested so as to accurately and completely measure the sulphur produced on a lease for purposes of royalty determination.
( b ) *Application and approval.* The lessee shall not commence production of sulphur until the Regional Supervisor has approved the method of measurement. The request for approval of the method of measurement shall contain sufficient information to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Regional Supervisor that the method of measurement meets the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section.
##### 



WYETH
ACTING THROUGH ITS
WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS DIVISION 500 Arcola Road  Collegeville,
Pennsylvania 19426 USA
  th
    Section 3.2.2
 Section 3.7
 Data and Deliverables. in vitro in vivo




---



##### 



New
Section 6.4
 6.4 Transfer of Materials by Wyeth.
 6.4.1. Transfer.
 6.4.2. Use of Wyeth Materials.
 6.4.3. Unauthorized Use of Materials.




---



##### 



6.4.4.
Title to Wyeth Materials.
 6.4.5. Return of Wyeth Materials.
 6.4.6. License.
 6.4.7. Survival.
   [signature page follows]




---



##### 



By:
    
    /s/ Robert J. SmithName: Robert J. SmithTitle: Senior Vice PresidentACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:TRUBION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Peter ThompsonName: Peter A. Thompson, M.D.Title: President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: 12/4/2006
### Part E—Merchant Seamen Licenses, Certificates, and Documents

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Part E establishes the authority for the Coast Guard to issue, suspend, and revoke licenses, certificates of registry, and merchant mariner's documents for individuals who are to be engaged on vessels of the United States.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1985—Pub. L. 99–36, §1(a)(9)(B), May 15, 1985, 99 Stat. 67, substituted "Merchant Seamen Licenses, Certificates, and" for "Licenses, Certificates, and Merchant Mariners' " in part E heading.
### §57302. Authority to acquire vessels

To promote the construction of new, safe, and efficient vessels to carry the domestic and foreign waterborne commerce of the United States, the Secretary of Transportation may acquire an obsolete vessel in exchange for an allowance of credit toward the cost of construction or purchase of a new vessel as provided in this chapter.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1662.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 57302 | 46 App.:1160(b) (1st, last sentences). | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title V, §510(b) (1st, last sentences), as added Aug. 4, 1939, ch. 417, §7, 53 Stat. 1184; Pub. L. 87–401, subdiv. (1), Oct. 5, 1961, 75 Stat. 833; Pub. L. 91–469, §35(a), Oct. 21, 1970, 84 Stat. 1035; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(91), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 161. |

Section

The words "toward the cost of construction or purchase of a new vessel" are added for clarity. The text of 46 App. U.S.C. 1160(b) (last sentence) is omitted as obsolete.