alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6003

JOHN A. FREEMAN, II,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

D. A. WHITE, Officer; CAPTAIN BARKSDALE; UNKNOWN SERGEANT; UNKNOWN BOND COMPANY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-95-920)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 16, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam

opinion.

John A. Freeman, II, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
1 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988).

2 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b).

3 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) (1988).

4 Adams v. Rice, 40 F.3d 72, 74 (4th Cir. 1994), cert. denied,

___ U.S. ____, 63 U.S.L.W. 3690 (U.S. Mar. 20, 1995) (No. 94-

7733).

2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motions for a temporary restraining order, appointment of counsel,

and an injunction in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) civil action. We

dismiss the appeal as to the denial of the temporary restraining

order and for the appointment of counsel because the district

court's order as to those motions is not appealable. This court may

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,1 and certain interlocutory and collateral orders.2 Those parts of the order here

appealed are neither final nor appealable as interlocutory or

collateral.

The district court's denial of an injunction is immediately

appealable3 and the finding of frivolousness is reviewed for an

abuse of discretion.4 We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Freeman v. White,

No. CA-95-920 (W.D. Va. Dec. 6, 1995). Additionally, we deny

Appellant's motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
3

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive
        - Federal Election Commission

#  Federal Election Commission 

**Collected by:** Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive 

**Archived since:**Jan, 2014

**Description:**
In 1975, Congress created the Federal Election Commission (FEC) to administer and enforce the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) - the statute that governs the financing of federal elections. The duties of the FEC, which is an independent regulatory agency, are to disclose campaign finance information, to enforce the provisions of the law such as the limits and prohibitions on contributions, and to oversee the public funding of Presidential elections.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal,     	    American History & Political Science

**Creator:**    	    Federal Election Commission

**Language:**    	    English

**Collector:**    	    U.S. Government Publishing Office

## Narrow Your Results

### 

            There are no further ways to narrow your results.           

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear

              - Sites
              - Search Page Text

Page 1 of 1  (9 Total Results)

**Sort By:**
                - Title (A-Z)
                - Title (Z-A)
                - URL (A-Z)
                - URL (Z-A)

### URL:     http://www.fec.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     http://www.youtube.com/fectube/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://beta.fec.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://twitter.com/FEC?lang=en/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://twitter.com/fec/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://twitter.com/fecupdates/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.fec.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.youtube.com/user/FECTube/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.youtube.com/user/FECTube/videos

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

Page 1 of 1  (9 Total Results)

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
Exhibit
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 AND
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
   In
connection with this Annual Report of Equity Ventures Group, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Colette Kim, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:
  1.
              Such
      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31,
      2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  2.
              The
      information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for
      the period ending December 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of Equity Ventures Group, Inc.
  By: /s/Colette
Kim
 Colette
Kim,
 President,
Chief Executive Officer,
 Chief
Financial Officer, Secretary &
 Director
  April 20,
2009
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-

OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Firearms Training Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory A. Ton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/S/ Gregory A. Ton     
|Gregory A. Ton         
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 15, 2004
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsRobot Position Sensor Fault ToleranceRobot systems in critical applications, such as those in space and nuclear environments, must be able to operate during component failure to complete important tasks. One failure mode that has received little attention is the failure of joint position sensors. Current fault tolerant designs require the addition of directly redundant position sensors which can affect joint design. A new method is proposed that utilizes analytical redundancy to allow for continued operation during joint position sensor failure. Joint torque sensors are used with a virtual passive torque controller to make the robot joint stable without position feedback and improve position tracking performance in the presence of unknown link dynamics and end-effector loading. Two Cartesian accelerometer based methods are proposed to determine the position of the joint. The joint specific position determination method utilizes two triaxial accelerometers attached to the link driven by the joint with the failed position sensor. The joint specific method is not computationally complex and the position error is bounded. The system wide position determination method utilizes accelerometers distributed on different robot links and the end-effector to determine the position of sets of multiple joints. The system wide method requires fewer accelerometers than the joint specific method to make all joint position sensors fault tolerant but is more computationally complex and has lower convergence properties. Experiments were conducted on a laboratory manipulator. Both position determination methods were shown to track the actual position satisfactorily. A controller using the position determination methods and the virtual passive torque controller was able to servo the joints to a desired position during position sensor failure.Document ID19970015278Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsAldridge, Hal A.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1997Subject CategoryEngineering (General)Report/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:110314NASA-TM-110314Accession Number97N18236Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 519-30-21-04Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970015278.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(a)**

**or Rule 15d-14(a)**

 

I, John H. Homier,certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-K of NGP Capital Resources Company; 

 

2. Based on myknowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) or for causing such controls and procedures to beestablished and maintained, for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report myconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors: 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 16, 2005
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of HouseValues, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ian Morris, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: March 11,2008
Editorial Note on Part 1206
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1206 (formerly part 206) appear at 67 FR 19111, Apr. 18, 2002.

§ 1206.65 Does ONRR protect information that I provide? ( a ) Certain information that you or your affiliate submit(s) to ONRR regarding the valuation of oil, including transportation allowances, may be exempt from disclosure.
( b ) To the extent that applicable laws and regulations permit, ONRR will keep confidential any data that you or your affiliate submit(s) that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise exempt from disclosure.
( c ) You and others must submit all requests for information under the Freedom of Information Act regulations of the Department of the Interior at 43 CFR part 2.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








We have issued our report dated June 16, 2014, with respect to the financial statements and supplemental schedule included in the Annual Report of the GCI 401(k) Plan on Form 11-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of General Communication, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 3360728, effective April 5, 1993, File No. 333‐08760 effective September 27, 1995, File No. 333-66877 effective November 6, 1998, File No. 333‐45054 effective September 1, 2000, File No. 333‐106453 effective June 25, 2003, File No. 333‐152857, effective August 7, 2008, File No. 333‐165878 effective April 2, 2010 and File No. 333-188434 effective May 8, 2013).





/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP





Portland, Oregon


June 16, 2014
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.920 What are the BSEE requirements for assessment of fixed platforms? ( a ) You must document all wells, equipment, and pipelines supported by the platform if you intend to use either the A-2 or A-3 assessment category. Assessment categories are defined in API RP 2A-WSD, Section 17.3 (as incorporated by reference in § 250.198). If BSEE objects to the assessment category you used for your assessment, you may need to redesign and/or modify the platform to adequately demonstrate that the platform is able to withstand the environmental loadings for the appropriate assessment category.
( b ) You must perform an analysis check when your platform will have additional personnel, additional topside facilities, increased environmental or operational loading, inadequate deck height, or suffered significant damage (e.g., experienced damage to primary structural members or conductor guide trays or global structural integrity is adversely affected); or the exposure category changes to a more restrictive level (see Sections 17.2.1 through 17.2.5 of API RP 2A-WSD, incorporated by reference in § 250.198, for a description of assessment initiators).
( c ) You must initiate mitigation actions for platforms that do not pass the assessment process of API RP 2A-WSD. You must submit applications for your mitigation actions (e.g., repair, modification, decommissioning) to the Regional Supervisor for approval before you conduct the work.
( d ) The BSEE may require you to conduct a platform design basis check when the reduced environmental loading criteria contained in API RP 2A-WSD Section 17.6 are not applicable.
( e ) By November 1, 2009, you must submit a complete list of all the platforms you operate, together with all the appropriate data to support the assessment category you assign to each platform and the platform assessment initiators (as defined in API RP 2A-WSD) to the Regional Supervisor. You must submit subsequent complete lists and the appropriate data to support the consequence-of-failure category every 5 years thereafter, or as directed by the Regional Supervisor.
( f ) The use of Section 17, Assessment of Existing Platforms, of API RP 2A-WSD is limited to existing fixed structures that are serving their original approved purpose. You must obtain approval from the Regional Supervisor for any change in purpose of the platform, following the provisions of API RP 2A-WSD, Section 15, Re-use.
[76 FR 64462, Oct. 18, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 36150, June 6, 2016]
#### § 586.25 HUD's negotiations and consultations with the LRA.

HUD may negotiate and consult with the LRA before and during the course of preparation of the LRA's application and during HUD's review thereof with a view toward avoiding any preliminary determination that the application does not meet any requirement of this part. LRAs are encouraged to contact HUD for a list of persons and organizations that are representatives of the homeless operating in the vicinity of the installation.
#### Lucille Wasserman, Also Known as Lucille W. Baker, Respondent, v. Jacob Wasserman, Also Known as Jack W. Baker, Appellant.

Motion by appellant for a stay of order awarding alimony *pendente Ute*and counsel fee, pending appeal therefrom, granted (1) on condition that appellant perfect the appeal and be ready to argue or submit it at the October Term, beginning October 1,1962 (appeal ordered on the calendar for said term); and (2) on the further condition that appellant pay to respondent $50 a week on account of the alimony, beginning June 15, 1962. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before August 27, 1962. The amount here directed to be paid as a condition to the granting of the stay is not intended to affect or influence the trial court in any determination it may make respecting alimony. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
§ 1208.11 Surety requirements. ( a ) The eligible purchaser, prior to execution of the contract, shall furnish an “ONRR-specified surety instrument,” in an amount equal to the estimated value of royalty oil that could be taken by the purchaser in a 99-day period, plus related administrative charges. The ONRR may require the purchaser to increase the amount of the surety instrument when necessary to protect the Government's interest or may allow the purchaser to decrease the amount of the surety instrument where necessary to further the purposes of the Royalty-in-Kind Program.
( b ) If a letter of credit is furnished as the surety instrument, it must be effective for a 9-month period beginning the first day the royalty oil contract is effective, with a clause providing for automatic renewal monthly for a new 9-month period. The purchaser or its surety company may elect not to renew the letter of credit at any monthly anniversary date, but must notify ONRR of its intent not to renew at least 30 days prior to the anniversary date. The ONRR may grant the purchaser 45 days to obtain a new surety instrument. If no replacement surety instrument is provided, ONRR will terminate the contract effective at least 6 months prior to the expiration date of the letter of credit. Notwithstanding the above provisions, the letter of credit also may contain a clause providing for automatic termination 6 months after the royalty oil contract terminates. If a certificate of deposit is furnished as the surety instrument, it must be effective for the life of the contract plus 6 months after the royalty oil contract terminates.
( c ) For the purposes of this section, an “ONRR-specified surety instrument” means either: an ONRR-specified surety bond, an ONRR-specified irrevocable letter of credit, or a financial institution book-entry certificate of deposit.
( d ) The “ONRR-specified surety instrument” shall be in a form specified by ONRR instructions or approved by ONRR. A bond must be issued by a qualified surety company that has been approved by the Department of the Treasury. An irrevocable letter of credit or a certificate of deposit must be from a financial institution acceptable to ONRR. The ONRR will use a bank rating service to determine whether a financial institution has an acceptable rating to provide a surety instrument deemed adequate to indemnify the Government from loss or damage.
( e ) All surety instruments must be in a form acceptable to ONRR and must include such other specific requirements as ONRR may require adequately to protect the Government's interests.
[58 FR 64901, Dec. 10, 1993]