alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.5

PHH MORTGAGE SERVICES

[PHH MORTGAGE SERVICES LOGO]

February 25, 2005

Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc.
One Belvedere Place, Suite 330
Mill Valley, CA 94941

HSBC Bank USA
452 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10018

RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance

Investor number(s)/Deal name(s): 168/ SEQUOIA 2003-6

Dear Investor, Master Servicer or Trustee,

The undersigned officer certifies the following for PHH Mortgage Corp. f/k/a
Cendant Mortgage Corp., for the 2004 calendar year. To the best of our
knowledge:

   a) The activities and performances of the Servicer during the preceding
      Fiscal year under the terms of the above Servicing Agreement, Trust
      Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Servicer Guide and to
      the best of my knowledge the Servicer has fulfilled all of its duties,
      responsibilities or obligations under this Agreement throughout such year,
      or if there has been default or failure of the Servicer to perform any
      such duties, responsibilities or obligations, a description of each
      default or failure and the nature and status thereof has been reported to
      HSBC Bank USA;

   b) The Servicer is currently an approved FNMA or FHLMC Servicer in good
      standing;

   c) The Fidelity Bond, the Errors and Omissions Insurance Policy and any other
      bonds required under the terms of the Servicing Agreement, Trust
      Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Servicer Guide are in
      full force and effect:

   d) All premiums for each Hazard Insurance Policy, Flood Insurance Policy (if
      applicable) and Primary Mortgage Insurance Policy (if applicable), with
      respect to each Mortgaged Property, have been paid and that such insurance
      policies are in full force and effect;

   e) All real estate taxes, governmental assessments and any other expenses
      accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or encumbrance on
      any Mortgage Property, have been paid, or if any such costs or expenses
      have been paid with respect to any Mortgaged Property, the reason for the
      non-payment has been reported to HSBC Bank USA;

   f) All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

   g) All annual reports of Foreclosure and Abandonment of Mortgaged Property
      required per section 6050H, 6050J and 6050P of the Internal Revenue Code,
      respectively, have been prepared and filed.

Certified by

/s/ William E- Fricke, Jr.
--------------------------------------------
William E- Fricke, Jr.
Assistant Vice President

FEB 25 2005
--------------------------------------------
Date: February 25, 2005
#### Thomas J. Doyle, Respondent, v. Waverly Gray, etc., Appellant.

Motion by appellant for a stay, pending appeal, granted, on condition that appellant perfect the appeal and be ready to argue or submit it at the October Term beginning October 1, 1962; appeal ordered on the calendar for said term. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before August 20, 1962. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 8, 2016

d0229 

# Order

Clerk March 8, 2016

151500

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 151500

COA: 322664

Ingham CC: 08

- 000288

- FC

LOREN EUGENE SLOUGH, II,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 7, 2014

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, beca use the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Exhibit 32.2**CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), Bruce D.Horn, Chief Financial Officer of Oplink Communications, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifiesthat, to the best of his knowledge:**1.**The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 1, 2006, to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and**2.**The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition at the end of the period covered by the Quarterly Report and results ofoperations of the Company for the periods covered by the Quarterly Report.**In Witness Whereof,**the undersigned has set his hands hereto as of the 13th day of November, 2006.   /s/ Bruce D. Horn   Bruce D. Horn  Chief Financial Officer  This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SECand is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Actof 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 99.3



                 TURBODYNE COMPLETES CONCENTRATION OF RESOURCES,
                         RETAINS NEW INDEPENDENT AUDITOR


CARPINTERIA CA - JANUARY 20, 2000 - Turbodyne Technologies Inc. (EASDAQ:TRBD)
announced today that it has closed its offices in London, England and Paris,
France. The activities of these two offices are continued by Turbodyne's office
in Frankfurt, Germany. All communication should be directed to Peter Kitzinski,
General Manager Turbodyne Europe.
Messeturm, Box 23, D-60308 Frankfurt, Germany
Telephone: +49-69-975-44-501
Facsimile: +49-69-975-44-812
E-mail: euroturbo@aol.com

In addition, Turbodyne has closed its New York office. The activities of this
office are continued at the Company's headquarters in Carpinteria, CA. All
communication should be directed to Ken Fitzpatrick, VP Group Finance - Investor
Relations.
6155 Carpinteria Ave., Carpinteria, CA 93013
Telephone: 800-566-1130
Facsimile: 805-566-3499
E-mail: info@turbodyne.com

Gerhard E. Delf, Turbodyne's President and Chief Executive Officer, stated,
"This move completes Turbodyne's effort to concentrate its resources at two
strategic locations, Carpinteria, CA and Frankfurt, Germany. It continues
management's commitment to focus on increased efficiency and productivity
towards reduction in operating costs."

In another development, Turbodyne has retained McGowan Gunterman, Certified
Public Accountants, located in Santa Barbara, CA, as the Company's new
independent auditor.

Turbodyne Technologies Inc., a California based high technology company,
specializes in the development, manufacture and marketing of performance
enhancement, fuel economy and pollution control products for internal combustion
engines in the global automotive, transportation, construction, marine, mining
and military industries.

Turbodyne Technologies Inc.'s headquarters is located in Carpinteria, CA; the
European business location is Frankfurt, Germany.

Turbodyne's World  Wide  Web address is: www.turbodyne.com

Contacts:

Corporate Communications, Peter Weichselbraun (800) 566-1130
VP Group Finance - Investor Relations, Ken Fitzpatrick (800) 566-1130
European Business Development, Markus Kumbrink +49-69-975-44-665
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Albert Indrisano

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14631.

*Sally S. King,*in support of the petition.

*Rita M. Shair,*in opposition.

Decided October 30, 1992

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 283 (AC 10659), is granted, limited to the following questions:

“1. Was the Appellate Court correct in concluding that the record was insufficient, pursuant to *State*v. *Golding,*213 Conn. 233 (1989), to permit adequate appellate review of the defendant’s claims that, on its face and as applied, General Statutes § 53a-182 was void for vagueness under the state and federal constitutions?

*“2.*Is General Statutes § 53a-182 void for vagueness on its face and as applied to this case, under the state and federal constitutions?”
#### § 285.802 What must I do if I discover a potential archaeological resource while conducting my approved activities?

You must comply with all measures required under 30 CFR 585.702.
Exhibit 99.1




December 16, 2010




Bruce Broquet, (907) 868-6660; bbroquet@gci.com





FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE




GCI ANNOUNCES $100 MILLION INCREASE TO STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM




ANCHORAGE, AK – General Communication, Inc. (“GCI”) (NASDAQ:GNCMA) announced today that its Board of Directors approved a $100 million increase to its stock repurchase program. The action, which occurred at a scheduled board meeting, increases the program’s authorization by $100 million and provides for quarterly increases of $5 million. Including existing authorizations, GCI may purchase up to $127.8 million worth of its outstanding shares of common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions.




The plan does not have an expiration date. However, transactions pursuant to the plan are subject to periodic approval by the Board of Directors.  GCI expects to continue the repurchases for an indefinite period dependent on leverage, liquidity, company performance, market conditions and subject to continued oversight by the Board of Directors.  The repurchases have and will continue to comply with the restrictions of Rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




GCI (NASDAQ: GNCMA) is the largest telecommunications company in Alaska. A pioneer in bundled services, GCI provides local, long distance and wireless telephone, cable television, Internet and data communications services throughout Alaska. For more information, visit www.gci.com.




Forward-Looking Statements




This press release includes certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including without limitation, statements about the continuation of the stock repurchase program.  These forward-looking statements involve many risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements, including, without limitation, general market conditions.  These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this press release, and GCI expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to disseminate any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement contained herein to reflect any change in its expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.  Please refer to the publicly filed documents of GCI, including its most recent Forms 10-Q and 10-K for additional information about GCI and about the risks and uncertainties related to its business, which may affect the statements made in this press release.






#    #    #
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC 

# RECEIVED JAN 

## 202015 HEARING DOCKET

In the Matter ofJohnNypl FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) Respondent FDMS NO. FAA 2014-0808 FAA Case No. 2010WP250060 Honorable Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge

WITHDRAWAL OF REQUEST FORHEARING The Respondent files this withdrawal ofits Request for Hearing, pursuantto 14 C.F.R. § 13.215. Respondent, JohnNypl, filed arequest for hearing on October 7, 2014. The FAA filed its Complaint on October 22, 2014. A hearing is currently scheduled for March 6, 2015, in SanFrancisco, Californiabefore Judge Richard C. Goodwin. OnJanuary 8,2015, the parties reached a settlement agreement. As a result, the Respondent, hereby respectfully withdraws his Request for Hearing. Respectfully submitted,

Karl Schweikert, Esq., CA Bar 291497 Attorneys for Respondent, JohnNypl Churchwell White LLP . 1201 K Street, Suite 710 Sacramento, CA 95814 karl@churchwellwhite.com 916-468-0950 (o) 916-468-0951 (±) Date 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3440 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3440

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 100 Avenida RL Rodriguez in Bayamon, Puerto Rico, as the ``Dr. Jose 
                 Celso Barbosa Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 2005

 Mr. Fortuno introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 100 Avenida RL Rodriguez in Bayamon, Puerto Rico, as the ``Dr. Jose 
                 Celso Barbosa Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DR. JOSE CELSO BARBOSA POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 100 Avenida RL Rodriguez in Bayamon, Puerto Rico, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Dr. Jose Celso Barbosa Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dr. Jose 
Celso Barbosa Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
### §14911. Punishment of corporation for violations committed by certain individuals

An act or omission that would be a violation of this part if committed by a director, officer, receiver, trustee, lessee, agent, or employee of a carrier providing transportation or service subject to jurisdiction under chapter 135 that is a corporation is also a violation of this part by that corporation. The penalties of this chapter apply to that violation. When acting in the scope of their employment, the actions and omissions of individuals acting for or employed by that carrier are considered to be the actions and omissions of that carrier as well as that individual.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §103, Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 917.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 11915 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Reportof Cloud Medical Doctor Software Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2011 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael De La Garza, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operationsof the Company.
#### VAN VORST, Respondent, v. REED, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 20, 1903.)

Action by Seymour Van Vorst against Theodore F. Reed.

No opinion. Motion granted, so far as to dismiss appeal, with $10 costs.
Exhibit 32


Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the filing of the financial statements of China Sun Group High Tech Co. (“Registrant”) for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless
of any general incorporation language in such filing.





August 27, 2009


/s/ Bin Wang
Bin Wang
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)



/s/ Ming Fen Liu
Ming Fen Liu
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Annual Report of Equity Ventures Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, ,
Colette Kim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Colette Kim
--------------------------
Colette Kim
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer

February 4, 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 24-0300

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JAMIE LYNN STONE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 28, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 22 2024

07/22/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0300
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Simon Property Group, L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersignedcertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)          The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/ David Simon                                                                                                                             |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| David Simon                                                                                                                                 |   |
| Chief Executive Officer  of Simon Property Group, Inc.General Partner of Simon Property Group,  L.P.                                   |   |
| Date: August 11,  2006                                                                                                                 |   |
| /s/ Stephen E. Sterrett                                                                                                                     |   |
| Stephen E. Sterrett                                                                                                                    |   |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  of Simon Property Group, Inc.General Partner of Simon Property  Group, L.P. |   |
| Date: August 11,  2006                                                                                                                 |   |

 

35

----
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals 30023 06-DEC-2013 10:02 AM