alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Emergency Awards: Rapid Investigation of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).                    

*Date:*                         December 28-29, 2020.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health,  5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E70,  Rockville, MD 20892, (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mohammed S. Aiyegbo, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer,  Scientific Review Program,  Division of Extramural Activities,  National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health,  5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E70,  Rockville, MD 20852,  (301) 761-7106,                         *mohammed.aiyegbo@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 1, 2020. 

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2020-26751 Filed 12-3-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1904 Special instructions. ( a ) For purposes of this subpart, each and every reference in COS-2-01, COS-2-03, and COS-2-04 (incorporated by reference as specified in § 250.198) to the term *deepwater* means the entire OCS, including all water depths.
( b ) The BSEE does not incorporate by reference any requirement that you must be a COS member company. For purposes of this subpart, each and every reference in COS-2-01, COS-2-03, and COS-2-04 to the phrase *COS member company(ies)* means you, whether or not you are a COS member.
( c ) For purposes of this subpart, each and every reference in the relevant sections of COS-2-01, COS-2-03, and COS-2-04 (incorporated by reference as specified in § 250.198) to the *Center for Offshore Safety* or *COS* means *accreditation body* or *AB.*
( d ) For purposes of this subpart, each and every reference in ISO/IEC 17011 (incorporated by reference as specified in § 250.198) to *conformity assessment body (CAB)* means *ASP.*
[78 FR 20441, Apr. 5, 2013]
### SUBCHAPTER IV—EXECUTIVE BRANCH
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Parks! America, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tristan R. Pico, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date:  May 15, 2009By:/s/ Tristan R. PicoTristan R. Pico
Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSpace shuttle solid rocket booster main parachute damage reduction team reportThis report gives the findings of the space shuttle solid rocket booster main parachute damage reduction team. The purpose of the team was to investigate the causes of main parachute deployment damage and to recommend methods to eliminate or substantially reduce the damage. The team concluded that the two primary causes of significant damage during deployment are vent entanglement and contact of the parachutes with the main parachute support structure. As an inexpensive but effective step towards damage reduction, the team recommends modification of the parachute packing procedure to eliminate vent entanglement. As the most effective design change, the team recommends a pilot chute-deployed soft-pack system. Alternative concepts are also recommended that provide a major reduction in damage at a total cost lower than the pilot chute-deployed soft pack.Document ID19930008878Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsWatts, G.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1993Subject CategoryLaunch Vehicles And Space VehiclesReport/Patent NumberM-706NASA-TM-4437NAS 1.15:4437Accession Number93N18067Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930008878.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### **CHAPTER 1—DEFINITIONS**

Sec.
101.
Agency.
102.
Barge.
103.
Boundary Line.
104.
Citizen of the United States.
105.
Consular officer.
106.
Documented vessel.
107.
Exclusive economic zone.
108.
Fisheries.
109.
Foreign commerce or trade.
110.
Foreign vessel.
111.
Numbered vessel.
112.
State.
113.
Undocumented.
114.
United States.
115.
Vessel.
116.
Vessel of the United States.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of FCStone Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul G. Anderson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                                         
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------
|By: |  | /S/    PAUL G.
ANDERSON                 
|    |  | Paul G. Anderson Chief Executive Officer



Date:
November 29, 2005



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §1510. Wireless telecommunications tax and fee collection fairness

#### (a) Short title

This section may be cited as the "Wireless Telecommunications Tax and Fee Collection Fairness Act".

#### (b) Definitions

In this section:

#### (1) Financial transaction

The term "financial transaction" means a transaction in which the purchaser or user of a wireless telecommunications service upon whom a tax, fee, or surcharge is imposed gives cash, credit, or any other exchange of monetary value or consideration to the person who is required to collect or remit the tax, fee, or surcharge.

#### (2) Local jurisdiction

The term "local jurisdiction" means a political subdivision of a State.

#### (3) State

The term "State" means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, and any territory or possession of the United States.

#### (4) State or local jurisdiction

The term "State or local jurisdiction" includes any governmental entity or person acting on behalf of a State or local jurisdiction that has the authority to assess, impose, levy, or collect taxes or fees.

#### (5) Wireless telecommunications service

The term "wireless telecommunications service" means a commercial mobile radio service, as defined in section 20.3 of title 47, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor thereto.

#### (c) Financial transaction requirement

#### (1) In general

A State, or a local jurisdiction of a State, may not require a person who is neither a resident of such State or local jurisdiction nor an entity having its principal place of business in such State or local jurisdiction to collect from, or remit on behalf of, any other person a State or local tax, fee, or surcharge imposed on a purchaser or user with respect to the purchase or use of any wireless telecommunications service within the State unless the collection or remittance is in connection with a financial transaction.

#### (2) Rule of construction

Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to affect the right of a State or local jurisdiction to require the collection of any tax, fee, or surcharge in connection with a financial transaction.

#### (d) Enforcement

#### (1) Private right of action

Any person aggrieved by a violation of subsection (c) may bring a civil action in an appropriate district court of the United States for equitable relief in accordance with paragraph (2) of this subsection.

#### (2) Jurisdiction of district courts

Notwithstanding section 1341 of title 28, or the constitution or laws of any State, the district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction, without regard to the amount in controversy or citizenship of the parties, to grant such mandatory or prohibitive injunctive relief, interim equitable relief, and declaratory judgments as may be necessary to prevent, restrain, or terminate any acts in violation of subsection (c).

(Pub. L. 115–141, div. P, title VI, §620, Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1114.)
**Exhibit31.2**

 

**Certification of Chief FinancialOfficerPursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Joseph W. Baty, certify that:

 

1.     Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Weider NutritionInternational, Inc.;

 

2.     Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)   Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)   Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)   Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)   Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)   Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. 

 
| Date: April 14, 2004 | /s/  JOSEPH W. BATY |   |
|----------------------|-------------------------------|--------|
|                 |  Joseph W. Baty          |
|                 | Chief Financial Officer       |

 

----
#### § 203.56 Does relief transfer when a lease is assigned?

Yes. Royalty relief is based on the lease circumstances, not ownership. It transfers upon lease assignment.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Vincent A. Ciffa, Appellant.

Order of substitution of attorneys entered. (James S. Fanning, Esq., for John J. Mahon, Esq.).
EXHIBIT 99-1


                 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                (SECTION 906 OF THE SATBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, Steve Furner, the Chief Executive Officer of Odd Job Stores, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 of the
Company (the "Report"):

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  May 15, 2003                        By: /s/ Steve Furner
       -------------------------               --------------------
                                               Steve Furner,
                                               Chief Executive Officer
I 

' 

Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA-~ . \"J -31L\ \ 20ll{ -AJM - 2_LJQ-4-D 

Directorate Identifier: -A:D 

I( nm make clumge.\ lo the values in the table below. you must en.wre the totals update accordingly. {l 

they do 1wt, dick (or Tuh; i11to and then out <~(the c!tanged cell. ~~----------------------------------~ 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g .. Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) 

Do (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products --------·------- Inspect ,, ., '· J _.1_ ... ; t)f"!{ 80.0 0 ,}_,:u-~.~ ur 652 {' 

i f~ ( l{! " 0 ()(j 

i ~ \ I ', t. JH, \ o.on ~ t'IH} i < 0 qp - · 1,1· ' ,·; (j{ \ () 1\(j 

J!i( : ,lPt ·:. n no 

' ' {I ., dJH '< 0.{}11 - I( i; ~ro ' \)(I(} 

- ' ' {H' " :.. on . ; \ i! no I ' ' .; l•f •, t · Oil \ i).' !(i ------------ ,. 1( s ,'Jf;(J ~~ 0 [l(J 

' '. 1( '.tP, > n r~n 

-

' (, ·t ., i ; r ~ 

'" \ ll. )(I 

' (~ li( '<' ,, (!() " 0 q(! 

-- l ''! " (l_!)f\ ~ (~ {) ~j() 

' l ' il I)(• ''"; [)_()\) 

' ' \ ,. f] (•( " n ~H) 

IJ I il! ' n 'lf! 

' ( '' ' ' \ !'t ,)(l 

- · - " I ,. t\ \H ., \) fJfJ -·-· ·-

The known number of products in com pi iance: 0 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $4,433,600 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $0 

On-Cond~tion Costs: . , 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g. , Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

testing, and close- replacement) up) 

Unknown ' ' ,,.·. ~. !}.\)\f 

" t 

,; j fl.UI) 

- l• ;., I '" ' I) f)() 

. C/F} c. {) !,l!' 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): The work 
required per airplane varies from 67 man hours to 82 man hours depending upon the airplane 

configuration. Cost estimate was completed using 80 man hours as an overal conservative 

estimate. 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? • 

YES* D NO IZl 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? -

YES* D NO IZl 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.~ 

YES D NO [gJ 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? 6lt 

YES* D NO [gJ 

*Explanation: 

DO NOT DELETE PAGE BREAK
### §3504. Notification to passengers

(a) A person selling passage on a foreign or domestic passenger vessel having berth or stateroom accommodations for at least 50 passengers and embarking passengers at United States ports for a coastwise or an international voyage shall notify each prospective passenger of the safety standards applicable to the vessel in a manner prescribed by regulation.

(b) All promotional literature or advertising through any medium of communication in the United States offering passage or soliciting passengers for ocean voyages anywhere in the world shall include information similar to the information described in subsection (a) of this section, and shall specify the registry of each vessel named, as a part of the advertisement or description of the voyage. Except for the inclusion of the country of registry of the vessel, this subsection does not apply to voyages by vessels meeting the safety standards described in section 3505 of this title.

(c) A person violating this section or a regulation prescribed under this section is liable to the United States Government for a civil penalty of not more than $10,000. If the violation involves the sale of tickets for passage, the owner, charterer, managing operator, agent, master, individual in charge, or any other person involved in each violation also is liable to the Government for a civil penalty of $500 for each ticket sold. The vessel on which passage is sold also is liable in rem for a violation of this section or a regulation prescribed under this section.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 519.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 3504 | 46:362(b) |

Section 3504 requires notification to the public of the safety standards that are applicable to certain foreign flag or United States passenger vessels. In addition, all promotional literature or advertising that offers passage or solicits passengers for ocean voyages anywhere in the world shall include a safety standard statement and shall specify the registry of the vessel. If the vessel meets the international standards to which the United States adheres, then the safety standard statement need not be included. In all other cases the type of safety standard statement that must be included is as prescribed by regulation. This section is intended to place the United States public on notice as to the degree of fire safety compliance of a foreign-flag passenger vessel that does not operate or depart from a port or place in the United States but does embark passengers from the United States at nearby foreign ports. Departures from foreign ports are undertaken because the foreign-flag passenger vessel cannot comply with the safety standards applicable to a United States flag passenger vessel.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0606

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CHRISTOPHER I TOULOUSE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 1, 2021, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 26 2021

07/26/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0606