alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1009 Requirements to obtain pipeline right-of-way grants. ( a ) In addition to applicable requirements of §§ 250.1000 through 250.1008 and other regulations of this part, regulations of the Department of Transportation, Department of the Army, and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), when a pipeline qualifies as a right-of-way pipeline, the pipeline shall not be installed until a right-of-way has been requested and granted in accordance with this subpart. The right-of-way grant is issued pursuant to 43 U.S.C. 1334(e) and may be acquired and held only by citizens and nationals of the United States; aliens lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States as defined in 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(20); private, public, or municipal corporations organized under the laws of the United States or territory thereof, the District of Columbia, or of any State; or associations of such citizens, nationals, resident aliens, or private, public, or municipal corporations, States, or political subdivisions of States.
( b ) A right-of-way shall include the site on which the pipeline and associated structures are to be situated, shall not exceed 200 feet in width unless safety and environmental factors during construction and operation of the associated right-of-way pipeline require a greater width, and shall be limited to the area reasonably necessary for pumping stations or other accessory structures.
#### Sophie Hines, Appellant, v. Ruby Chinn, Respondent.

Motion granted and time for argument of appeal extended to include October 1960 Term on condition appellant’s briefs are filed on or before September 29, 1960. Respondent’s brief must be filed on or before October 6, 1960 if appeal is to be argued at October 1960 Term.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3424 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3424

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to interfering with 
                     the operation of an aircraft.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2005

 Mr. Sessions introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to interfering with 
                     the operation of an aircraft.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pilot Protection Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. INTERFERING WITH THE OPERATION OF AN AIRCRAFT.

     Section 32 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by redesignating paragraphs (5), 
        (6), and (7) as paragraphs (6), (7), and (8) respectively;
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (4) of subsection (a), the 
        following:
            ``(5) interferes with or disables, with intent to endanger 
        the safety of any person or with a reckless disregard for the 
        safety of human life, anyone engaged in the authorized 
        operation of such aircraft or any air navigation facility 
        aiding in the navigation of any such aircraft;'';
            (3) in subsection (a)(8), by striking ``paragraphs (1) 
        through (6)'' and inserting ``paragraphs (1) through (7)''; and
            (4) in subsection (c), by striking ``paragraphs (1) through 
        (5)'' and inserting ``paragraphs (1) through (6)''.
                                 <all>
```
### §1406i. Taxes and fees; power to assess and collect; ports of entry; export duties

Taxes and assessments on property and incomes, internal-revenue taxes, license fees, and service fees may be imposed and collected, and royalties for franchises, privileges, and concessions granted may be collected for the purposes of the Government of the Virgin Islands as may be provided and defined by the municipal councils herein established: Provided, That all money hereafter derived from any tax levied or assessed for a special purpose shall be treated as a special fund in the treasury of the Virgin Islands and paid out for such purpose only, except when otherwise authorized by the legislative authority having jurisdiction after the purpose for which such fund was created has been accomplished. Until Congress shall otherwise provide, all laws concerning import duties and customs in the municipality of Saint Thomas and Saint John now in effect shall be in force and effect in and for the Virgin Islands: Provided, That the Secretary of the Treasury shall designate the several ports and sub-ports of entry in the Virgin Islands of the United States and shall make such rules and regulations and appoint such officers and employees as he may deem necessary for the administration of the customs laws in the Virgin Islands of the United States; and he shall fix the compensation of all such officers and employees and provide for the payment of such compensations and other expenses of the collection of duties, fees, and taxes imposed under the customs laws from the receipts thereof. The export duties in effect on June 22, 1936 may be from time to time reduced, repealed, or restored by ordinance of the municipal council having jurisdiction: Provided further, That no new export duties shall be levied in the Virgin Islands except by the Congress.

(June 22, 1936, ch. 699, §36, 49 Stat. 1816.)
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Midway Games Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, David F. Zucker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ David F. Zucker
David F. Zucker
Chief Executive Officer
May 9, 2005




---



##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Midway Games Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Thomas E. Powell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Thomas E. Powell
Thomas E. Powell
Chief Financial Officer
May 9, 2005
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.124 Will BSEE approve gas injection into the cap rock containing a sulphur deposit? To receive the Regional Supervisor's approval to inject gas into the cap rock of a salt dome containing a sulphur deposit, you must show that the injection: ( a ) Is necessary to recover oil and gas contained in the cap rock; and
( b ) Will not significantly increase potential hazards to present or future sulphur mining operations.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT EXPERTS**

 

The Board of Directors

James River Coal Company

 

Marshall Miller & Associates, Inc. hereby consents to the use in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, and the incorporation by reference into the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration Statement No. 333-118190), of the information contained in our report, dated as of March 31, 2004, setting forth the estimates of the Company’s coal reserves.

 

| Marshall Miller & Associates, Inc. |
|----------------------------------------|

 

| By:  /s/ Peter Lawson |  
Name:  Peter Lawson

 
Title:  Executive Vice President

 

March 25, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### La France Carpets, Inc., Plaintiff, v. United States Rubber Company, Appellant, and Celanese Corporation of America, Respondent. United States Rubber Company, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Gerli & Co., Inc., Third-Party Defendant.

Order, entered on May 2, 1963, denying motion of defendant-appellant to dismiss for insufficiency the first and second cross claims of defendant-respondent, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant, and the motion granted, without prejudice to the service of an amended answer alleging a cross claim grounded in negligence if the defendant-respondent be so advised. The first cross claim seeks indemnity and is grounded on implied warranty. The very terms of the writing relied on by defendant-respondent specifically exclude any express or implied warranty. (Personal Property Law, § 94.) 'The second cross claim is in common-law indemnity for the alleged negligence of the defendant-appellant in the making of the carpeting .purchased iby the plaintiff in the event it recovers from the defendant-respondent. Plaintiff’s sole cause of action against defendant-respondent is on the express warranty of said defendant to plaintiff that carpeting material consisting of Celaire fibre made by respondent when combined with rubber backing applied by appellant would be merchantable. Plaintiff’s cause of action against respondent does not allege negligence on the part of either the appellant or the respondent; hence there is no basis for indemnity as pleaded. Subdivision (.b) of section 3019 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules allows a cross claim for any cause of action and does not require it to be dependent on the claim of the plaintiff. However, the said cross claim fails to allege any facts establishing the violation of any legal duty owing from the appellant to the respondent. Concur — Botein, P. J„ Rabin, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1


                        CHINA FINANCE ONLINE CO. LIMITED

                                  Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned, Zhao Zhiwei, Chief
Executive Officer of China Finance Online Co. Limited (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to his knowledge, that the Company's annual report on Form 20-F for
the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


Date: May 23, 2006              /s/ Zhao Zhiwei
                                _______________________________
                                Name:  Zhao Zhiwei
                                Title: Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
§ 22.11 Instructions on handling future changes in design. All approvals are granted with the understanding that the manufacturer will make the detector according to the drawings submitted to MSHA which have been considered and included in the approval. Therefore, when the manufacturer desires to make any changes in the design, the manufacturer should first obtain MSHA's approval of the change. The procedure is as follows: ( a ) ( 1 ) The manufacturer must write to the U.S. Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration, Approval and Certification Center, 765 Technology Drive, Triadelphia, WV 26059, requesting an extension of the original approval and stating the change or changes desired. With this request, the manufacturer should submit a revised drawing or drawings showing changes in detail, together with one of each of the parts affected.
( 2 ) Where the applicant for approval has used an independent laboratory under part 6 of this chapter to perform, in whole or in part, the necessary testing and evaluation for approval of changes to an approved product under this part, the applicant must provide to MSHA as part of the approval application: ( i ) Written evidence of the laboratory's independence and current recognition by a laboratory accrediting organization;
( ii ) Complete technical explanation of how the product complies with each requirement in the applicable MSHA product approval requirements;
( iii ) Identification of components or features of the product that are critical to the safety of the product; and
( iv ) All documentation, including drawings and specifications, as submitted to the independent laboratory by the applicant and as required by this part.
( b ) MSHA will consider the application and inspect the drawings and parts to determine whether it will be necessary to make any tests.
( c ) If no tests are necessary, the applicant will be advised of the approval or disapproval of the change by letter from MSHA.
( d ) If tests are judged necessary, the applicant will be advised of the material that will be required.
[Sched. 8C, Oct. 31, 1935, as amended by Supp. 1, 20 FR 2575, Apr. 19, 1955; 43 FR 12315, Mar. 24, 1978; 52 FR 17514, May 8, 1987; 60 FR 35694, July 11, 1995; 68 FR 36420, June 17, 2003; 73 FR 52212, Sept. 9, 2008]
EXHIBIT 99(b)

Independent Accountants' Report



The Board of Directors

HSBC Finance Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of consumer automobile finance receivables owned by HSBC Automotive Trust, 2004-1has been conductedby HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer,in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated July 28, 2004 (the Agreement), as supplemented, as of December 31, 2004 and for the period July 28, 2004 to December 31, 2004. HSBC Finance Corporation's management is responsible for the assertion.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting that the servicing of receivables has been conducted in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Agreement, as supplemented, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion,management's assertion thatthe servicing of the receivables has been conducted by HSBC Finance Corporation,successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation,as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated July 28, 2004, as supplemented,as of December 31, 2004 and for the period July 28, 2004 to December 31, 2004 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of the addressee and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than this specified party.



/s/ KPMG LLP

March 1, 2005



Management Assertion





As of December 31, 2004 and for the period July 28, 2004 to December 31, 2004, the servicing of consumer automobile finance receivables owned by Household Automotive Trust 2004-1 has been conducted by HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated July 28, 2004, as supplemented.





|/s/ Steve Smith 
Steve Smith
Servicing Officer
HSBC Finance CorporationMarch 1, 2005
Date | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 



|/s/ Joan Coppenrath
Joan Coppenrath
Controller
HSBC Finance Corporation - Auto FinanceMarch 1, 2005
Date | /s/ Craig Peters
Craig Peters
Group Director - Asset Management
HSBC Finance Corporation - Auto FinanceMarch 1, 2005
Date
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
### §20118. Prohibition on public disclosure of railroad safety analysis records

(a) In General.—Except as necessary for the Secretary of Transportation or another Federal agency to enforce or carry out any provision of Federal law, any part of any record (including, but not limited to, a railroad carrier's analysis of its safety risks and its statement of the mitigation measures it has identified with which to address those risks) that the Secretary has obtained pursuant to a provision of, or regulation or order under, this chapter related to the establishment, implementation, or modification of a railroad safety risk reduction program or pilot program is exempt from the requirements of section 552 of title 5 if the record is—

(1) supplied to the Secretary pursuant to that safety risk reduction program or pilot program; or

(2) made available for inspection and copying by an officer, employee, or agent of the Secretary pursuant to that safety risk reduction program or pilot program.

(b) Exception.—Notwithstanding subsection (a), the Secretary may disclose any part of any record comprised of facts otherwise available to the public if, in the Secretary's sole discretion, the Secretary determines that disclosure would be consistent with the confidentiality needed for that safety risk reduction program or pilot program.

(c) Discretionary Prohibition of Disclosure.—The Secretary may prohibit the public disclosure of risk analyses or risk mitigation analyses that the Secretary has obtained under other provisions of, or regulations or orders under, this chapter if the Secretary determines that the prohibition of public disclosure is necessary to promote railroad safety.

(Added Pub. L. 110–432, div. A, title I, §109(a), Oct. 16, 2008, 122 Stat. 4866.)
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 71 FR 34520 and 34521, June 15, 2006.

#### §§ 40.106-40.110 [Reserved]
### §§50b to 50d–1. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 50b to 50d–1, relating to Territory of Alaska, were omitted in view of admission of Alaska into the Union.

Section 50b, act Mar. 7, 1928, ch. 137, §1, 45 Stat. 239, authorized Secretary of the Interior to accept donations for school, medical, and reindeer service.

Section 50c, act May 14, 1930, ch. 273, §1, 46 Stat. 321, related to availability of appropriations for education, medical relief, and reindeer.

Section 50d, act May 9, 1938, ch. 187, §1, 52 Stat. 311, empowered Secretary of the Interior to authorize officers to incur obligations for benefit of natives prior to appropriation.

Section 50d–1, act June 1, 1944, ch. 220, §1, 58 Stat. 266, empowered Secretary to authorize officers to incur obligations for benefit of natives in excess of current appropriations.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the
      Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment
      Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certifies
      that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Michael M.
      Schurer


Michael
      M. Schurer


Chief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer


(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)


March
      28,
      2006
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley
Cornerstone Fund IV L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Christian
Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.








By: /s/Christian Angstadt

Name:	  Christian Angstadt
Title: Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management Corporation,
       the general partner of the Partnership

Date:  August 14, 2008