alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2


Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and


Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code


In connection with the Annual Report of OHA Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Cory E. Gilbert, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:


|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 21, 2019/s/ CORY E. GILBERTCory E. GilbertChief Financial Officer and Treasurer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to OHA Investment Corporation and will be retained by OHA Investment Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
¿Le interesa aprender más sobre la

ciudadanía estadounidense? El Servicio de 

Ciudadanía e Inmigración de Estados 

Unidos (USCIS, por sus siglas en inglés) le 

ofrece un sitio web para ayudarle a 

prepararse. En el Centro de Recursos de 

Ciudadanía usted puede encontrar:

 • Requisitos para obtener la ciudadanía

 estadounidense por medio de la

 naturalización

 • Solicitud de Naturalización,

 Formulario N-400

 • Tarifas actuales y tiempo de

 procesamiento

 • Materiales para el estudio del inglés, la

 historia y el gobierno de Estados Unidos

 • Actividades para el estudio

 • Recursos audiovisuales

 • Información sobre los próximos 

 eventos de ciudadanía de USCIS 

 • Un buscador web para encontrar clases

 de inglés y ciudadanía cerca de usted

 • Sugerencias para localizar organismos

 de ayuda en su comunidad

INMIGRANTES DE TODAS PARTES DEL MUNDO ESTAN ORGULLOSOS DE SER

CIUDADANOS AMERICANOS

APRENDA SOBRE EL PROCESO

DE CIUDADANIA Y

PREPARESE PARA EL EXAMEN

¡Visite www.uscis.gov/citizenship

para empezar hoy mismo!
Si su organización necesita materiales educativos centrados en la ciudadanía, 

USCIS tiene un sitio web fácil de usar. A través del Centro de Recursos de 

Ciudadanía, los educadores pueden encontrar:

• Planes de estudio y actividades para sus estudiantes

• Publicaciones y manuales de ciudadanía

• Herramientas en internet para el desarrollo profesional

• Podcasts y videos

• Información acerca de talleres de entrenamiento

• Prácticas prometedoras de proveedores experimentados

• Oportunidades para fondos federales

Además, usted puede añadir sus clases de inglés y ciudadanía al America’s 

Literacy Directory, un directorio web que permite a los usuarios encontrar 

proveedores locales de inglés y ciudadanía en los 50 estados y territorios

estadounidenses. 

PREPARE A ESTUDIANTES ADULTOS

PARA LA CIUDADANIA ESTADOUNIDENSE

¡Visite www.uscis.gov/citizenship para aprender más hoy mismo!

RECURSOS PARA LAS CLASES Y LOS EDUCADORES

M-798-S (03/11)
### §42102. Regulations of other agencies

(a) Request to Agency.—To further the objectives and policy set forth in section 50101 of this title, the Federal Maritime Commission shall request the head of a department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States Government to suspend, modify, or annul any existing regulations, or to make new regulations, affecting shipping in the foreign trade, except regulations relating to the Public Health Service, the Consular Service, or the inspection of vessels.

(b) Prior Review and Approval.—A department, agency, or instrumentality of the Government may not prescribe a regulation affecting shipping in the foreign trade (except a regulation affecting the Public Health Service, the Consular Service, or the inspection of vessels) until the regulation has been submitted to the Commission for its approval and final action has been taken by the Commission or the President.

(c) Submission to President.—If the head of a department, agency, or instrumentality of the Government refuses to comply with a request under subsection (a) or objects to a decision of the Commission under subsection (b), the Commission or the head of the department, agency, or instrumentality may submit the facts to the President. The President may establish, suspend, modify, or annul the regulation.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §7, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1549.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 42102(a) | 46 App.:876(a)(3). | June 5, 1920, ch. 250, §19(a)(3), (b), (c), 41 Stat. 995; Ex. Ord. No. 6166, §12, eff. June 10, 1933; June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title II, §204, title IX, §904, 49 Stat. 1987, 2016; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(46), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 157; Pub. L. 105–258, title III, §301, Oct. 14, 1998, 112 Stat. 1915. |
| 42102(b) | 46 App.:876(b). | |
| 42102(c) | 46 App.:876(c). | |

Section

In this section, the words "department, agency, or instrumentality" are substituted for "department, board, bureau, or agency" for consistency in the revised title. The words "the inspection of vessels" are substituted for "the steamboat inspection service" because the Steamboat Inspection Service has been abolished and its functions are now carried out by the Coast Guard.

In subsection (a), the word "shall" is substituted for "is authorized and directed" for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words.
#### § 1290.111 What happens if I do not pay or appeal an order?

If you neither pay nor appeal an order under this part, that order is the final decision of the Department, you have failed to exhaust administrative remedies as required under § 1290.110(a), and you may not contest the validity or merits of that order in any subsequent proceeding to enforce that order under 30 U.S.C. 1719 and part 1241 of this chapter.

[79 FR 62051, Oct. 16, 2014]
§ 578.41 Unified Funding Agency costs. ( a ) *In general.* UFAs may use up to 3 percent of their FPRN, or a maximum amount to be established by the NOFA, whichever is less, for fiscal control and accounting costs necessary to assure the proper disbursal of, and accounting for, federal funds awarded to subrecipients under the Continuum of Care program.
( b ) *UFA costs.* UFA costs include costs of ensuring that all financial transactions carried out under the Continuum of Care program are conducted and records are maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, including arranging for an annual survey, audit, or evaluation of the financial records of each project carried out by a subrecipient funded by a grant received through the Continuum of Care program.
( c ) *Monitoring costs.* The costs of monitoring subrecipients and enforcing compliance with program requirements are eligible for costs.
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.115 What are the procedures for, and effects of, incorporation of documents by reference in this part? For the documents incorporated by reference in this part: ( a ) Incorporation by reference of a document is limited to the edition of the document, or the specific edition and supplement or addendum, that is cited in § 250.198. Future amendments or revisions of the incorporated document are not included. BSEE will publish any changes to the incorporation of the document in the Federal Register and amend § 250.198 as appropriate.
( b ) BSEE may make a rule amending the incorporation of a document effective without prior opportunity for public comment when BSEE determines: ( 1 ) That the revisions to the document result in safety improvements or represent new industry standard technology and do not impose undue costs on the affected parties; and
( 2 ) BSEE meets the requirements for making a rule immediately effective under 5 U.S.C. 553.
( c ) The effect of incorporation by reference of a document into the regulations in this part is that the incorporated document is a requirement. When a section in this part refers to an incorporated document, you are responsible for complying with the provisions of that entire document, except to the extent that the section that refers to the document provides otherwise. When a section in this part refers to a part of an incorporated document, you are responsible for complying with that part of the document as provided in that section.
( d ) Under §§ 250.141 and 250.142, you may comply with a later edition of a specific document incorporated by reference, provided: ( 1 ) You show that complying with the later edition provides a degree of protection, safety, or performance equal to or better than would be achieved by compliance with the listed edition; and
( 2 ) You obtain prior written approval for alternative compliance from the authorized BSEE official.
[84 FR 21968, May 15, 2019]
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Annual Report of Artcraft V, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending May 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Li Te Xiao, Chief  Executive Officer and Chief financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

 (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the            Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the         financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

*/s/ Li Te Xiao*

Li Te Ciao

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer

 

August 25, 2005

 

 

16
§ 882.516 Maintenance, operation, and inspections. ( a ) *Maintenance and operation.* The Owner must provide all the services, maintenance and utilities as agreed to under the Contract, subject to abatement of housing assistance payments or other applicable remedies if the Owner fails to meet these obligations.
( b ) *Periodic inspection.* In addition to the inspections required prior to execution of the Contract, the PHA must inspect or cause to be inspected the contract units in accordance with the physical inspection requirements under 24 CFR part 5, subpart G, at least annually, and at such other times as may be necessary to assure that the Owner is meeting the obligations to maintain the units so they are compliant with 24 CFR part 5, subpart G, and to provide the agreed upon utilities and other services. The PHA must take into account complaints and any other information coming to its attention in scheduling inspections.
( c ) *Units with health and safety hazards.* If the PHA notifies the Owner that the unit(s) under Contract are not being maintained in compliance with the standards under 24 CFR part 5, subpart G, and the Owner fails to take corrective action (including corrective action with respect to the Family where the condition of the unit is the fault of the Family) within the time prescribed in the notice, the PHA may exercise any of its rights or remedies under the Contract, including abatement of housing assistance payments (even if the Family continues in occupancy) or termination of the Contract on the affected unit(s) and assistance to the Family in accordance with § 882.514(e).
( d ) *PHA management.* Where the PHA is managing units on which it is also administering the Housing Assistance Payments Contract pursuant to a management contract approved by HUD in accordance with § 882.412, HUD will make reviews of project operations, including inspections, in addition to required PHA reviews. These HUD reviews will be sufficient to assure that the Owner and the PHA are in full compliance with the terms and conditions of the Contract and the ACC. Should HUD determine that there are deficiencies, it may exercise any rights or remedies specified for the PHA under the Contract or reserved for HUD in the ACC, require termination of the management contract, or take other appropriate action.
( e ) *Periodic reviews.* Periodic PHA audits must be conducted as required by HUD, in accordance with 2 CFR part 200, subpart F.
[47 FR 34383, Aug. 9, 1982, as amended at 53 FR 8065, Mar. 11, 1988; 80 FR 75941, Dec. 7, 2015; 88 FR 30499, May 11, 2023]
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 14, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00018

- CV

THE MA YAN AT SAN MARCOS RIVER

, LLC and City of Martindale, Texas, Appellants

v.

CITY OF SAN MARCOS , Texas, Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18

- 0958

- CV

- A Honorable Jessica Crawford, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellee has filed a motion for extension of time to file its brief. The motion is GRANTED. Appellee’s brief is due June 24, 2019.

____________ _____________________ Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 14th day of June, 2019

.

__________ _________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
#### WATTS *vs.*CLEGG.

[ACTION ON THE CASE FOB PAMAGES, &p,]

1. *Indictment, original (f; whenadmissible evidence.*— In an action of damages for causing tbe plaintiff to be indicted for perjury, tbe original indictment is receivable in evidence unless it appears that tbe final record bas been completed.

2. *Same; how may be authenticated.*— It maybe authenticated by tbe verbal testimony of tbe clerk.

3. *Judgment of acquittal; effect of.*— In such a ease, tbe minute entry of tbe judgment of acquittal in tbe prosecution for perjury is not *res inter alios acta.*

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Clay.

Tried before Hon. Charles Pelham.

The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion,

Taul Bradford, for appellant.

L. E. Parsons, *contra.*

B. E. SAEEOLD, J.

The appeal is from a judgment against the appllant, in an action of damages for causing the appellee to be indicted for perjury.

On the trial, the plaintiff was permitted to introduce the original indictment against him for perjury, and to prove by the clerk that it was a record of his court. Without proof that the final record of that prosecution was made up, the original papers were *admissible.*—Buffington *v. Cook,*39 Ala. 64; *Calvert v. Marlowe,*18 Ala. 67; *Barron v. Fort,*18 Ala. 668. In *Carroll v. Pathkiller,*(3 Porter, 279,) the *562clerk was not permitted to testify that a transcript which he had certified as complete, was not so, but that there were other proceedings omitted. The court said the proper way was to obtain a complete transcript. Of course, that is the rule when the final record has been made up. But how else can the papers from which the record is to be made up be verified before? The clerk is their custodian, — the court knows its own officers, — and his certificate to a transcript, with the seal of the court attached, is nothing more than his declaration under his official oath, authenticated in a particular way which is unnecessary in this case. *Baier v. Woodbury,*1 Pick. 362.

The plaintiff was also permitted to read in evidence the minute entry of the judgment of acquittal in the case of his indictment for perjury. There was no error in this, for the reasons above stated, and, also, because it was evidence to establish the fact of his acquittal, notwithstanding the parties were not the same. In such a case, the record is not *res inter alios acta.*— 1 Greenl. Ev. §§ 538, 527. The objections of the defendant to the above rulings of the court were general, not specifying any particular causes,

The judgment is affirmed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCISCO CORTEZ,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 12-56924

D.C. No. 3:10-cv-01473-CABWMC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Cathy Ann Bencivengo, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 4, 2014

UCLA

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, IKUTA and NGUYEN, Circuit 

Judges.

Because this claim arises under the Federal Tort Claims Act, we apply state

law to Cortez’s false imprisonment and assault/battery claims. 28 U.S.C.

§ 1346(b)(1).

FILED

MAR 21 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
page 2

1. Under California law, “[t]he elements of a tortious claim of false

imprisonment are: (1) the nonconsensual, intentional confinement of a person, (2)

without lawful privilege, and (3) for an appreciable period of time, however brief.” 

Easton v. Sutter Coast Hosp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 485, 496 (2000). The Border Patrol

agents had legal authority to refer Cortez to secondary inspection without any

individualized suspicion. See United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543, 562

(1976); United States v. Preciado-Robles, 964 F.2d 882, 884 (9th Cir. 1992). The

trial court credited the agents’ testimony that the duration of Cortez’s detention at

secondary inspection was a direct result of his own obstruction and failure to

cooperate with their permissible follow-up questions, and that Cortez was released

once he complied with their request to produce his law enforcement credentials. 

Cortez has failed to show that this credibility determination was clearly erroneous. 

See Valenzuela v. Michel, 736 F.3d 1173, 1177 (9th Cir. 2013).

2. To make out a claim for assault/battery against the Border Patrol agents,

Cortez must establish that they used unreasonable force to detain him. Cal. Penal

Code § 835a; Edson v. City of Anaheim, 63 Cal. App. 4th. 1269, 1272–73 (1998);

Judicial Council of Cal., Civ. Jury Instr. § 1305. Because we find that Cortez’s

detention at secondary inspection was proper, we need not address his argument
page 3

that the use of any force to effect that detention was per se unreasonable. Nor do

we find the “‘guided’ extraction” of Cortez from his vehicle or the assumption of a

“bladed stance” by a nearby officer during this process to be unreasonable under

the circumstances. 

AFFIRMED.
### **CHAPTER 285—COMMUTER RAIL MEDIATION**

Sec.
28501.
Definitions  1

28502.
Surface Transportation Board mediation of trackage use requests.
28503.
Surface Transportation Board mediation of rights-of-way use requests.
28504.
Applicability of other laws.
28505.
Rules and regulations.

1  So in original. Probably should be followed by a period.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to**

**Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Héctor Alonso, certify that: 

 

1. Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IMPSAT Fiber Networks, Inc. (the “Registrant”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theRegistrant and we have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared, 

 

(b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8283 (June 5, 2003)], 

 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation, and 

 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) all adversely significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information ; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting. 

 

 

May23, 2005
§ 14.10 Post-approval product audit. ( a ) Approved conveyor belts will be subject to periodic audits by MSHA to determine conformity with the technical requirements upon which the approval was based. MSHA will select an approved conveyor belt to be audited; the selected belt will be representative of that distributed for use in mines. Upon request to MSHA, the approval holder may obtain any final report resulting from the audit.
( b ) No more than once a year, except for cause, the approval holder, at MSHA's request, must make 3 samples of an approved conveyor belt of the size specified in § 14.5 available at no cost to MSHA for an audit. If a product is not available because it is not currently in production, the manufacturer will notify MSHA when it is available. Representatives of the applicant and other persons agreed upon by MSHA and the applicant may be present during audit tests and evaluations. MSHA will also consider requests by others to observe tests.
( c ) A conveyor belt will be subject to audit for cause at any time MSHA believes the approval holder product is not in compliance with the technical requirements of the approval.
§ 1220.010 NPSL capital account. ( a ) For each NPSL tract, an NPSL capital account shall be established and maintained by the lessee for NPSL operations. The NPSL capital account shall include debit entries for all allowable direct and allocable joint costs incurred during the term of the lease, appropriate overhead allowances permitted on these costs pursuant to § 1220.012, and allowances for capital recovery calculated pursuant to § 1220.020. The NPSL capital account shall be credited with production revenues attributable to the NPSL and any other credits arising from NPSL activities.
( b ) The NPSL capital account shall be kept on an accrual basis.
[45 FR 36800, May 30, 1980, as amended at 75 FR 61087, Oct. 4, 2010]