alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **CHAPTER 16—BROADBAND ACCESS**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—BROADBAND GRANTS FOR STATES, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, PUERTO RICO, AND TERRITORIES

Sec.
1701.
Findings.
1702.
Grants for broadband deployment.
1703.
Broadband DATA maps.
1704.
Broadband Deployment Locations Map.
1705.
Grants for broadband connectivity.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—DIGITAL EQUITY ACT OF 2021

1721.
Definitions.
1722.
Sense of Congress.
1723.
State Digital Equity Capacity Grant Program.
1724.
Digital Equity Competitive Grant Program.
1725.
Policy research, data collection, analysis and modeling, evaluation, and dissemination.
1726.
General provisions.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—ENABLING MIDDLE MILE BROADBAND INFRASTRUCTURE

1741.
Enabling middle mile broadband infrastructure.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—BROADBAND AFFORDABILITY

1751.
Definitions.
1752.
Benefit for broadband service.
1753.
Adoption of consumer broadband labels.
1754.
Digital discrimination.
### §10902. Short line purchases by Class II and Class III rail carriers

(a) A Class II or Class III rail carrier providing transportation subject to the jurisdiction of the Board under this part may acquire or operate an extended or additional rail line under this section only if the Board issues a certificate authorizing such activity under subsection (c).

(b) A proceeding to grant authority under subsection (a) of this section begins when an application is filed. On receiving the application, the Board shall give reasonable public notice of the beginning of such proceeding.

(c) The Board shall issue a certificate authorizing activities for which such authority is requested in an application filed under subsection (b) unless the Board finds that such activities are inconsistent with the public convenience and necessity. Such certificate may approve the application as filed, or with modifications, and may require compliance with conditions (other than labor protection conditions) the Board finds necessary in the public interest.

(d) The Board shall require any Class II rail carrier which receives a certificate under subsection (c) of this section to provide a fair and equitable arrangement for the protection of the interests of employees who may be affected thereby. The arrangement shall consist exclusively of one year of severance pay, which shall not exceed the amount of earnings from railroad employment of the employee during the 12-month period immediately preceding the date on which the application for such certificate is filed with the Board. The amount of such severance pay shall be reduced by the amount of earnings from railroad employment of the employee with the acquiring carrier during the 12-month period immediately following the effective date of the transaction to which the certificate applies. The parties may agree to terms other than as provided in this subsection. The Board shall not require such an arrangement from a Class III rail carrier which receives a certificate under subsection (c) of this section.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §102(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 823.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 10902, Pub. L. 95–473, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1403, related to authorizing action by rail carriers to provide adequate, efficient, and safe facilities.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32

    CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned,  Michael A. Grollman, Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief
Executive  Officer and Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer of National  Scientific
Corporation (the "Company"),  has executed this certification in connection with
the  filing  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  of the  Company's
Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal  quarter ended December 31, 2004
(the "Report"). The undersigned hereby certifies that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certificate as of the 14th
day of February 2005.


/s/ Michael A. Grollman
----------------------------------
Michael A. Grollman
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer,
and Acting Chief Financial Officer
November 5, 2010

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with Senator Carper’s Staff

FROM: Marc Thomas Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329

A conference call was held on October 26, 2010 between Senator Carper’s staff and EPA to discuss how the proposed rule , “Identification of Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials that are Solid Wastes (NHSM),” characterized used oil. EPA explained that, under the proposed rule,

used oil that meets the “on- specification” criteria under 40 CFR Part 279 standards for management of used oil would be considered a “t raditional fuel” and not a solid waste. On the other hand, “off-spec” used oil, which does not meet the 40 CFR Part 279 standards, is considered to be a solid waste and can only be combusted in units meeting CAA section 129 standards for solid waste incinerators. Off-spec us ed oil that is processed into on-spec used oil, however, would not be considered a solid waste.

EPA also provided an overview of the re lated proposed rules under sections 112 and 129 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), which establish emi ssions standards for boile rs, process heaters,

and certain solid waste incinerators. Additiona lly, EPA answered questio ns regarding potential impacts of the proposed rules on the used oil industry.

List of Meeting Attendees :

Stephanie Kotin, Senator Carper Laura Haines, Senator Carper Jim Berlow, EPA/OSWER Randy Detiz, EPA/OSWER George Faison, EPA/OSWER Marc Thomas, EPA/OSWER Kimberly Cochran, EPA/OSWER Robin Dunkin, EPA/OAR Megan Brachtl, EPA/OAR Peter Tsirigotis, EPA/OAR Ketan Patel, EPA/OAR Phil Loran, EPA/OAR Raquel Snyder, EPA/OCIR
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IMPSAT Fiber Networks on Form 10-Q
for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ricardo A. Verdaguer,
Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.

Date: November 14, 2003

/s/ Ricardo A. VerdaguerRicardo A. VerdaguerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-120866, 333-120867, No. 333-139539 and No. 333-139543 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 9, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Neenah Paper, Inc. and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of Neenah Paper, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Neenah Paper, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

/s/*Deloitte & Touche LLP*

 

Atlanta, Georgia

 

March 9, 2011

 

----
#### § 1241.7 How do I request a hearing on the record on a Notice?

You may request a hearing on the record before an ALJ on a Notice by filing a request within 30 days of the date of service of the Notice with the DCHD, at the address indicated in your Notice. The 30 day-period to request a hearing on the record will not be extended for any reason.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Danny Mendelson, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Wise Metals Group LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2006



/S/ DANNY MENDELSONDanny MendelsonExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary
158°

BATHYMETRIC MAP

30"

—

GULF OF ALASKA
WALLS KNOLL

5]0000m.£.
J

nn
ssqooimy,

SA Oreey

{
1 @ AWA
| (2

+59g0000m.N

DERIKSON SEAMOUNT NN 4-5 +

5830000,

| ,1000 | 1001

DA

58g0000m.NN

Bathymetry compiled by the National Ocean Service (NOS) from Bathymetric Data other than

NOS hydrographic surveys. This is a facsimile reproduction of the bathymetric manuscript and
_ does not necessarily represent its final published form. This information is not intended for

navigational purposes.

Bathymetric Contour Interval: 50 meters to maximum depth, supplemented by 10 meter intervals.

“Universal Transverse Mercator Grid. Zone 4; 10,000 meter ticks (---) are shown inside the neat-

line.

va in subdued (screened) black was compiled by the Minerals

Protraction Diagram data
Management Service (MM
THIS MAP IS NOT A LI DO
use the MMS Outer Continento

EVALUATION OF BATHYMETRIC DATA

Bathymetry compiled by the National Ocean Service from
Random Tracklines and Bathymetric Surveys dated 1944 to 1974.
‘The Bathymetric Data ranges in scale from 1:500,000 to
1:1,000,000 with a minimum line spacing of 3.0/and a maximum
line spacing of 15.0 nautical miles,

Data corrected for sound velocity according to Echo-Sounding
Correction Tables, 1980.

OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MAP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE

1985

Produced at Washington, D.C.
for
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE
TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION
Scale 1:250,000

° 5 15 20 Statute Miles
i —
5 () 5 10 15 20 25 30 Kilometers
oo
10 15 Nautical Miles

159°

BATHYMETRIC DATA INDEX

156°

sae

Bathymetric data from sources other than
NOS hydrographic surveys

54

53°

53°

159°

156°

690000m.£,

WALLS KNOLL
NOS NN 4-6 (OCS)

162° INDEX TO ADJOINING SHEETS 193
55° _ 5°
3° roy
SEAMOUNT NN 4-6
a &
Ns
»
stir of
NN a> ow |
52°-——__. 52:

a

is.
#### WUPPERMANN v. VALENTINE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

June 22, 1903.)

1. Dismissal of Cause—Failure to Prosecute—Abuse of Discretion.

An order on motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution unless plaintiff placed the cause on the calendar within a time fixed will not be disturbed, no abuse of the court’s discretion appearing.

Appeal from City Court of New York, Special Term.

Action by Josephine W. Wuppermann against Ferdinand Valentine. From an order granting a motion to dismiss the complaint unless plaintiff placed the cause on the calendar within three days, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and GILDERSLEEVE and MacLEAN, JJ.

Menken Bros., for appellant.

Arthur Furber, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant made a motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution. The motion was granted, unless plaintiff placed the cause on the calendar within three days from the entry of the order. The defendant entered an order on said motion, and then appealed from each and every part of said order. We are not satisfied that there has been such an abuse of discretion on the part of the court below, in giving plaintiff the opportunity of placing the cause on the calendar, as to call for a reversal.

The order is affirmed, with costs.
Argued and submitted March 31,

affirmed April 29, 1998

#### Daniel C. ANGIER, *Appellant, v.*Aimee K. CARD, *Respondent.*

(16-96-10888; CA A99182)

957 P2d 203

James C. Jagger and James C. Jagger, P.C., filed the brief for appellant.

William E. Flinn argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Arnold Gallagher Saydack Percell & Roberts, P.C.

Before De Muniz, Presiding Judge, and Haselton and Armstrong, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *Levens v. Koser,*126 Or App 399, 869 P2d 344 (1994).
#### MULLIGAN, Respondent, v. FORTY-SECOND ST., M. & ST. N. AVE. R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 13, 1903.)

Action, by Rose M. Mulligan against the Forty-Second Street, Manhattanville & St. Nicholas Avenue Railroad Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDetailed Results from the Flame Extinguishment Experiment (FLEX) March 2009 to December 2011The Flame Extinguishment Experiment (FLEX) program is a continuing set of experiments on droplet combustion, performed employing the Multi-User Droplet Combustion Apparatus (MDCA), inside the chamber of the Combustion Integrated Rack (CIR), which is located in the Destiny module of the International Space Station (ISS). This report describes the experimental hardware, the diagnostic equipment, the experimental procedures, and the methods of data analysis for FLEX. It also presents the results of the first 284 tests performed. The intent is not to interpret the experimental results but rather to make them available to the entire scientific community for possible future interpretations.Document ID20150023456Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsDietrich, Daniel L.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Ferkul, Paul V.*(National Center for Space Exploration Research on Fluids and Combustion Cleveland, OH, United States)*Bryg, Victoria M.*(National Center for Space Exploration Research on Fluids and Combustion Cleveland, OH, United States)*Nayagam, M. Vedha*(National Center for Space Exploration Research on Fluids and Combustion Cleveland, OH, United States)*Hicks, Michael C.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Williams, Forman A.*(California Univ., San Diego La Jolla, CA, United States)*Dryer, Frederick L.*(Princeton Univ. Princeton, NJ, United States)*Shaw, Benjamin D.*(California Univ. Davis, CA, United States)*Choi, Mun Y.*(Connecticut Univ. Storrs, CT, United States)*Avedisian, C. Thomas*(Cornell Univ., Inc. Ithaca, NY, United States)*Date AcquiredDecember 23, 2015Publication DateNovember 1, 2015Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And ThermodynamicsReport/Patent NumberGRC-E-DAA-TN5314E-18493NASA/TP-2015-216046Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 904211.04.02.30.07CONTRACT_GRANT: NNC08BA05BDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.KeywordsInternational Space StationDroplet CombustionMicrogravityAvailable DownloadsNameType20150023456.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 31.2
I, Samuel M. Hopkins, II, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of James River Coal Company;     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this annual report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:       a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;       b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and       c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):       a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and       b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 31, 2005   /s/ Samuel M. Hopkins, IISamuel M. Hopkins, II
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2007-1118 

VENTURE INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, VEMCO, INC., 

PATENT HOLDING COMPANY, and LARRY J. WINGET, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v. 

AUTOLIV ASP, INC. (successor to Morton International, Inc.), 

Defendant-Appellant. 

 John E. Anding, Drew, Cooper & Anding, of Grand Rapids, Michigan, argued for 

plaintiffs-appellees. With him on the brief was Thomas V. Hubbard. 

 

 Peter E. Greene, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, of New York, New 

York, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was Cyrus Amir-Mokri. 

 

Appealed from: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan 

Senior Judge Avern Cohn 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 2007-1118 

VENTURE INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, VEMCO, INC., 

PATENT HOLDING COMPANY, and LARRY J. WINGET, 

 Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v. 

AUTOLIV ASP, INC. (successor to Morton International, Inc.), 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

Judgment 

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for 

 the Eastern District of Michigan 

in CASE NO(S). 2:99-CV-75354 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (LINN, and PROST, Circuit Judges, CLEVENGER, Senior Circuit Judge). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

DATED: July 11, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly, Clerk