alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1701. Publications for public distribution to be distributed by the Director of the Government Publishing Office; mailing lists

Money appropriated by any Act may not be used for services in an executive department or other Government establishment at the District of Columbia, in the work of addressing, wrapping, mailing, or otherwise dispatching a publication for public distribution, except maps, weather reports, and weather cards issued by them or for the purchase of material or supplies to be used in this work. The Director of the Government Publishing Office shall perform this work at the Government Publishing Office. The head of an executive department, independent office, and establishment of the Government at the District of Columbia, shall furnish from time to time to the Director of the Government Publishing Office mailing lists, in convenient form, and changes in them, or penalty mail slips, for use in the public distribution of publications issued by the department or establishment. The Director of the Government Publishing Office may furnish copies of a publication only in accordance with law or the instruction of the head of the department or establishment issuing the publication.

This section does not apply to orders, instructions, directions, notices, or circulars of information printed for and issued by an executive department or other Government establishment or to the distribution of public documents by Senators or Members of the House of Representatives or to the Senate Service Department, House of Representatives Publications Distribution Service, and document rooms of the Senate or House of Representatives.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1278; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(b), (c), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §95 (Aug. 23, 1912, ch. 350, §8, 37 Stat. 414; July 2, 1954, ch. 455, title I, §101, 68 Stat. 397).

"House of Representatives Publications Distribution Service" is substituted for "House Folding Room" because of the change of name under authority of Public Law 88–652.

The term "executive department, independent office, and establishment of the Government" is substituted for "executive department and other Government establishment" for uniformity.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

Pub. L. 113–235, §1301(c), substituted "Director of the Government Publishing Office" for "Public Printer" wherever appearing in section catchline and text.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Government Publishing Office" substituted for "Government Printing Office" in text on authority of section 1301(b) of Pub. L. 113–235, set out as a note preceding section 301 of this title.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

          - 12 CFR Part 620
          - RIN 3052-AD37

# AGENCY:

Farm Credit Administration.

# ACTION:

Notification of effective date.

# SUMMARY:

The Farm Credit Administration (FCA or we) is amending our regulations governing how a Farm Credit bank presents information on its related associations when preparing annual bank financial statements on a stand-alone basis. The final rule provides two presentation options when disclosing related association financial information in an annual bank report: By footnote or attached in a supplement.

# DATES:

The regulation amending 12 CFR part 620 published on October 8, 2020 (85 FR 63428) is effective on December 4, 2020.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*Technical information:*                         Joi Neal, Senior Accountant, Office of Regulatory Policy, (703) 883-4223, TTY (703) 883-4056,                         *nealj@fca.gov.*

*Legal information:*                         Laura McFarland, Senior Counsel, Office of General Counsel, (703) 883-4020, TTY (703) 883-4056,                         *mcfarlandl@fca.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On October 8, 2020, FCA issued a final rule to improve shareholder access to district financial information by providing an additional method of presenting financial information on a bank's related associations to those banks preparing annual financial statements on a stand-alone basis.

                    In accordance with 12 U.S.C. 2252(c)(1), the effective date of the rule is no earlier than 30 days from the date of publication in the                     **Federal Register**                     during which either or both Houses of Congress are in session. Based on the records of the sessions of Congress, the effective date of the regulation is December 4, 2020.                

Dated: December 7, 2020.

Dale Aultman,

Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board. 

[FR Doc. 2020-27191 Filed 1-4-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
#### Terry M. Benjamin, Respondent, v. Ernest Benjamin, Appellant

Motion for leave to prosecute appeal as a poor person granted and Seymour A. Kesten, Esq., is assigned as counsel for appellant. Stay granted, upon condition that the appeal be perfected, and note of issue be filed and record and brief be served and filed on or before November 18, 1960 and the ease be ready for argument at the present term of this court during the week commencing November 28, 1960.
#### § 1218.500 What is the purpose of this subpart?

This subpart contains instructions for designating a specific addressee of record for service of official correspondence using Form ONRR-4444, Addressee of Record Designation for Service of Official Correspondence.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,809
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,721
<ALLOWANCES>                                       100
<INVENTORY>                                     15,938
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,171
<PP&E>                                           5,645
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,499
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,207
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,670
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       112,345
<OTHER-SE>                                    (141,527)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,207
<SALES>                                         18,609
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,609
<CGS>                                            8,241
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,241
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,498
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,454
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,416
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,230
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,186
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,186
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
### §2215. Federal agency requirements

#### (a) Federal Points of Contact

At the request of the Revitalization Coordinator and within 30 days of receiving such a request, each Federal agency with jurisdiction over the permitting, or administrative or environmental review of private or public projects in Puerto Rico, shall name a Point of Contact who will serve as that agency's liaison with the Revitalization Coordinator.

#### (b) Federal grants and loans

For each Critical Project with a pending or potential Federal grant, loan, or loan guarantee application, the Revitalization Coordinator and the relevant Point of Contact shall cooperate with each other to ensure expeditious review of such application.

#### (c) Expedited reviews and actions of Federal agencies

All reviews conducted and actions taken by any Federal agency relating to a Critical Project shall be expedited in a manner consistent with completion of the necessary reviews and approvals by the deadlines under the Expedited Permitting Process, but in no way shall the deadlines established through the Expedited Permitting Process be binding on any Federal agency.

(Pub. L. 114–187, title V, §505, June 30, 2016, 130 Stat. 602.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 505 of Pub. L. 114–187. Subsec. (d) of section 505 of Pub. L. 114–187 amended section 1492a of this title.
### §1423c. Privileges of members

(a) The members of the legislature shall, in all cases except treason, felony, or breach of the peace, be privileged from arrest during their attendance at the legislature and in going to and returning from the same.

(b) No member of the legislature shall be held to answer before any tribunal other than the legislature itself for any speech or debate in the legislature.

(Aug. 1, 1950, ch. 512, §13, 64 Stat. 388.)
SI 0-100901-075 

VENTURA 

THE REAL 

VISITORS & CONVENTION BUREAU 

August24,2010 g i._ 

—iCOsg 

The Honorable Ray LaHood ~ op2 ^ 

Secretary cpd^m 

United States Department of Transportation > ^^ ^ 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE _o ^o O 

Waslnington D.C. 1' CO 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

This letter is sent to you to indicate our support of the application of Ventura 

County/Oxnard Airport for a grant in the 2010 Small Community Air Service 

Development Program as an incentive for new air service at Oxnard Airport. 

The Oxnard Airport has provided passenger air service since 1946 and, until United 

Express terminated its scheduled air service on June 8"^ of this year. The loss of air 

service has a significant impact on Ventura County Tourism and Business Travel. 

Traveler's only option is to now drive to/from either Burbank Airport or Los Angeles 

International Airport. The drive on the freeways from Ventura County is long and often 

congested. It can easily take over two hours to get to/from either airport. 

It is our understanding that management of Ventura County Department of Airports has 

had meetings with Horizon Air about providing nonstop service to San Jose with flights 

continuing on to its markets in the Pacific Northwest. We are strongly in support of this 

type of air service and feel that it will be an important link to markets in the north and 

connections to other areas. We believe that if Horizon Air is successful at Oxnard 

Airport, Horizon will add more flights to other markets or additional airlines will come to 

the airport with nonstop service to regional hubs. 

Our community needs air service at Oxnard Airport and this will be a good start. We 

strongly support the application of Ventura County/Oxnard Airport for a grant under this 

program and will support the new air service. 

Please feel free to contact the undersigned for any additional information you may 

require. 

Best Regards, 

Jfm Luttjohann 

Executive Director 

101 S. CALIFORNIA STREET, VENTURA, CA 93001 • 805.6482075 • VENTURA-USA.COM
#### Robert W. Stengel, Respondent, v Long Island Lighting Company, Appellant.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered August 11, 1977, which granted plaintiff’s motion for further disclosure proceedings. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Defendant-appellant did not sustain its burden of showing that the investigation file was "Material prepared for litigation” within the meaning of CPLR 3101 (subd [d]) (see *Mobil Oil Corp. v State of New York,*52 AD2d 1033; *Koump v Smith,*25 NY2d 287). Damiani, J. P., Titone, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
### §731c. Submission of sections 731b to 731e of this title to people of Puerto Rico for referendum; convening of constitutional convention; requisites of constitution

Sections 731b to 731e of this title shall be submitted to the qualified voters of Puerto Rico for acceptance or rejection through an island-wide referendum to be held in accordance with the laws of Puerto Rico. Upon the approval of said sections, by a majority of the voters participating in such referendum, the Legislature of Puerto Rico is authorized to call a constitutional convention to draft a constitution for the said island of Puerto Rico. The said constitution shall provide a republican form of government and shall include a bill of rights.

(July 3, 1950, ch. 446, §2, 64 Stat. 319.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Puerto Rican Federal Relations Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Constitutional Convention

A constitutional convention to draft a constitution for the island of Puerto Rico convened in San Juan on Sept. 17, 1951, and concluded its deliberations on Feb. 6, 1952.

#### Referendum

Act July 3, 1950, which enacted sections 731b to 731e of this title, was submitted to the qualified voters of Puerto Rico through an island-wide referendum held on June 4, 1951, and approved.
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive
        - National Guideline Clearinghouse

#  National Guideline Clearinghouse 

**Collected by:** Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive 

**Archived since:**Feb, 2015

**Description:**
NGC is an initiative of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) External Web Site Policy, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NGC was originally created by AHRQ in partnership with the American Medical Association and the American Association of Health Plans (now America's Health Insurance Plans [AHIP]).The NGC mission is to provide physicians and other health professionals, health care providers, health plans, integrated delivery systems, purchasers, and others an accessible mechanism for obtaining objective, detailed information on clinical practice guidelines and to further their dissemination, implementation, and use.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal,     	    Health & Medicine

**Creator:**    	    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

**Language:**    	    English

**Collector:**    	    U.S. Government Publishing Office

## Narrow Your Results

### 

            There are no further ways to narrow your results.           

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear

              - Sites
              - Search Page Text

Page 1 of 1  (5 Total Results)

**Sort By:**
                - Title (A-Z)
                - Title (Z-A)
                - URL (A-Z)
                - URL (Z-A)

### URL:     https://twitter.com/AHRQNews/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.facebook.com/ahrq.gov

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.guideline.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.linkedin.com/company/agency-for-healthcare-research-and-quality/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_2088729973&feature=iv&src_vid=i--U_1ET54w&v=B1ep4ykw-tw

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

Page 1 of 1  (5 Total Results)

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
#### Brian DeCoursey, Respondent, v Seven Hanover Associates, LLC, et al., Appellants.

[833 NYS2d 482]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Rosalyn Richter, J.), entered November 24, 2006, which, upon reargument, granted plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on liability on his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants emphasize evidence indicating that the alleged accident may have been caused in part by plaintiffs act of leaning out on the ladder. However, there was unrefuted evidence that although the ladder was designed to lock into a window mullion, the window at which the ladder was to be placed had no mullion, and that plaintiff pointed out this incompatibility to his supervisor but was repeatedly instructed, along with his coworker, to use the ladder. It was thus established that a lack of adequate protection was the cause of the accident, at least *343“in part” *(see Montalvo v J. Petrocelli Constr., Inc.,*8 AD3d 173, 175 [2004]), and, concomitantly, that plaintiffs conduct was not the sole cause of the accident *(see Ball v Cascade Tissue Group-N.Y., Inc.,*36 AD3d 1187 [2007]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Williams and Sweeny, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1507 How will BSEE measure training results? BSEE may periodically assess your training program, using one or more of the methods in this section. ( a ) *Training system audit.* BSEE or its authorized representative may conduct a training system audit at your office. The training system audit will compare your training program against this subpart. You must be prepared to explain your overall training program and produce evidence to support your explanation.
( b ) *Employee or contract personnel interviews.* BSEE or its authorized representative may conduct interviews at either onshore or offshore locations to inquire about the types of training that were provided, when and where this training was conducted, and how effective the training was.
( c ) *Employee or contract personnel testing.* BSEE or its authorized representative may conduct testing at either onshore or offshore locations for the purpose of evaluating an individual's knowledge and skills in perfecting well control, deepwater well control, and production safety duties.
( d ) *Hands-on production safety, simulator, or live well testing.* BSEE or its authorized representative may conduct tests at either onshore or offshore locations. Tests will be designed to evaluate the competency of your employees or contract personnel in performing their assigned well control, deepwater well control, and production safety duties. You are responsible for the costs associated with this testing, excluding salary and travel costs for BSEE personnel.
EXHIBIT 4.19

MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT

FIRST AMENDMENT



THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is dated as of the 3rd day of October, 2006.

BETWEEN:



WHITE KNIGHT RESOURCES LTD.,
a company incorporated under the
 laws of British Columbia and having its office at 922 - 510 West Hastings 
Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6B 1L8

(the Company)

OF THE FIRST PART



AND:

CERRO RICO MANAGEMENT CORP.,a company
incorporated under 
the laws of British Columbia and having its office at 922 - 510 West 
Hastings Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6B 1L8.

(Cerro Rico)

OF THE SECOND PART

WHEREAS:  The Company and Cerro Rico entered into a Management Services Agreement (the Agreement) effective January 31, 2006. The Company and Cerro Rico have agreed to amend the Agreement as follows:

Section 7.1(d)is revised to read:

If Cerro Ricos engagement is terminated pursuant to Section 6.1(e) or is deemed to be terminated pursuant to Section 6.1(e), the Companys obligation to compensate Cerro Rico shall in all respects cease, except that within 30 days after the Date of Termination the Company shall pay Cerro Rico the Accrued Obligation together with a termination fee equal to 24 months Base Fee payable hereunder as well as a lump sum payment of CAD$85,500 to cover the wages of employees of Cerro Rico.

RATIFICATION OF AGREEMENT:  The Company and Cerro Rico hereby ratify, adopt and confirm the Agreement, as amended by this First Amendment, as their valid and binding agreement, enforceable against each of them in accordance with its terms, and each of them confirms that, as amended the Agreement is in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly executed and is effective as of this 3rd day of October, 2006.









|WHITE KNIGHT RESOURCES LTD.

By:     /s/ John M. Leask 
Name:  John M. Leask
Title:     Chairman | CERRO RICO MANAGEMENT CORP.

By:     /s/ Megan Cameron-Jones
Name:   Megan Cameron-Jones
Title:     President
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
### §872. Habeas corpus; mandamus; suit to restrain assessment or collection of taxes

The supreme and district courts of Puerto Rico and the respective judges thereof may grant writs of habeas corpus in all cases in which the same are grantable by the judges of the district courts of the United States, and the district courts may grant writs of mandamus in all proper cases.

No suit for the purpose of restraining the assessment or collection of any tax imposed by the laws of Puerto Rico shall be maintained in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico.

(Mar. 2, 1917, ch. 145, §48, 39 Stat. 967; Mar. 4, 1927, ch. 503, §7, 44 Stat. 1421; May 17, 1932, ch. 190, 47 Stat. 158.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

"United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico" substituted in text for "District Court of the United States for Puerto Rico" in view of section 132(a) of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, which states that "There shall be in each judicial district a district court which shall be a court of record known as the United States District Court for the district" and section 119 of Title 28 which states that "Puerto Rico constitutes one judicial district".

#### Amendments

1927—Act Mar. 4, 1927, added second paragraph.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Puerto Rico" substituted in text for "Porto Rico" pursuant to act May 17, 1932, which is classified to section 731a of this title.