alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: McWilliams, Douglas A. [ mailto:douglas.mcwilliams@squirepb.com ]

Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 3:07 PM

To: Greenberg, Alan (ENRD)

Cc: Franz, Katy M.; Kacenjar, Allen A.

Subject: Release of Confidential Business Information for BART FIP Settlement Rule Support

‐‐ Attachment L: Tilden SO2 Control

Cost Analysis [I

‐ AMS.FID1382176]

Alan,

As we discussed during our telephone conference on Friday, Cliffs is transmitting documents requested by EPA for use in support

of the BART FIP settlement rulemaking. These are documents previously marked confidential business information. In this e

‐

mail, Cliffs is transmitting a redacted version of the Tilden SO2 Control Cost Analysis submitted as Attachment L to Cliffs’

September 28, 2012 comments on the BART FIP proposed rule. Cliffs withdraws its claim of confidential business information as

to the redacted version of this document only.

Additional documents requested by EPA with redactions sufficient for Cliffs to release CBI claims will be sent today via separate

e

‐ mails to ensure that the size of the attachments does not interfere with transmission.

The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the co rrect file and location. Douglas A. McWilliams

Partner

Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP

4900 Key Tower

127 Public Square

Cleveland, Ohio 44114

T +1 216 479 8332

O +1 216 479 8500

F +1 216 479 8780

M +1 216 407 4968

Douglas.McWilliams@squirepb.com | squirepattonboggs.com



### ------------------ ------------------ ----------------- ----------------

44 Offices in 21 Countries

This message is confidential and may be legally privileged or otherwise protect ed from disclosure. If you are not the

intended recipient, please te lephone or email the sender and delete this me ssage and any attachment from your system;

you must not copy or disclose the co ntents of this message or any attachment to any other person.

Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP is part of the intern ational legal practice Squire Patton Boggs, which operates

worldwide through a number of sepa rate legal entities. Please visit www.squirepattonboggs.com for more information.

#US

------------------ ------------------ ----------------- ----------------
### §785. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–558, §1, July 27, 1962, 76 Stat. 246

Section, R.S. §4748; act July 3, 1930, ch. 863, §§1, 2, 46 Stat. 1016, related to appointment of a person to sign name of Administrator to warrants for bounty lands.
§ 254.22 What information must I include in the “Introduction and OSRP contents” section? The “Introduction and OSRP contents” section must provide: ( a ) Identification of the facility the OSRP covers, including its location and type;
( b ) A table of contents;
( c ) A record of changes made to the OSRP; and
( d ) A cross-reference table, if needed, because you are using an alternate format for your OSRP.
[76 FR 64462, Oct. 18, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 36152, June 6, 2016]
### **CHAPTER 211—HOURS OF SERVICE**

Sec.
21101.
Definitions.
21102.
Nonapplication, exemption, and alternate hours of service regime.
21103.
Limitations on duty hours of train employees.
21104.
Limitations on duty hours of signal employees.
21105.
Limitations on duty hours of dispatching service employees.
21106.
Limitations on employee sleeping quarters.
21107.
Maximum duty hours and subjects of collective bargaining.
21108.
Pilot projects.
21109.
Regulatory authority.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2008**—Pub. L. 110–432, div. A, title I, §108(d)(2), (e)(2)(A), Oct. 16, 2008, 122 Stat. 4864, 4865, substituted item 21102 for former item 21102 "Nonapplication and exemption" and added item 21109.

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–440, title II, §203(b), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4620, added item 21108.
### §1662. Sovereignty of United States extended over Swains Island

The sovereignty of the United States over American Samoa is extended over Swains Island, which is made a part of American Samoa and placed under the jurisdiction of the administrative and judicial authorities of the government established therein by the United States.

(Mar. 4, 1925, ch. 563, 43 Stat. 1357.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1431 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Personal Property to Government of American Samoa

Pub. L. 96–597, title I, §101, Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3477, provided that: "Notwithstanding any other provision of law and subject to valid existing rights, all right, title, and interest of the Government of the United States in personal property situated in American Samoa shall be transferred, without reimbursement, to the American Samoa government on October 1, 1981, unless the agency of the Government of the United States having administrative responsibility for the property advises the Secretary of the Interior in writing before the date of transfer that it has a continuing requirement for such property."

#### Transfer of Certain Property to Government of American Samoa

Pub. L. 87–158, Aug. 17, 1961, 75 Stat. 392, authorized the Secretary of the Navy to transfer, without reimbursement or transfer of funds, to the government of American Samoa, within ninety days after August 17, 1961, title to all property, real and personal, located in American Samoa on that date which was owned by the United States and was within the administrative supervision of the Department of the Navy on such date.

#### Submerged Lands, Conveyance to Territory

Conveyance of submerged lands to the government of American Samoa, see section 1701 et seq. of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Ex. Ord. No. 10264. Transfer of Administration of American Samoa

Ex. Ord. No. 10264, eff. June 29, 1951, 16 F.R. 6419, provided:

1. The administration of American Samoa is hereby transferred from the Secretary of the Navy to the Secretary of the Interior, such transfer to become effective on July 1, 1951.

2. The Department of the Navy and the Department of the Interior shall proceed with the plans for the transfer of administration of American Samoa as embodied in the above-mentioned memorandum of understanding between the two departments.

3. When the transfer of administration made by this order becomes effective, the Secretary of the Interior shall take such action as may be necessary and appropriate, and in harmony with applicable law, for the administration of civil government in American Samoa.

4. The executive departments and agencies of the Government are authorized and directed to cooperate with the Departments of the Navy and Interior in the effectuation of the provisions of this order.

5. The said Executive order of February 19, 1900 [Ex. Ord. 125–A], is revoked, effective July 1, 1951.

Harry S. Truman.
#### SAMODWITZ v. KARPF.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 6, 1903.)

1. Municipal Court — New York City — Jurisdiction.

Laws 1902, c. 580, § 1, subd. 14, confers on the municipal court of the city of New York jurisdiction over actions 'for damages for an injury to personal property. Section 139 provides that no action shall" be maintained in the municipal court which arises on a written contract of conditional sale of personal, property, except an action to foreclose the lien. *Held,*that the general provision in section 1, subd. 14, is restricted by the excluding provision of section 139, and an action of the class, specified in the latter section, cannot be maintained, notwithstanding that it involves an injury to personal property.

Appeal from municipal court.

Action by Sigmund Samodwitz against Max Karpf. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

Argued before BARTLETT, JENKS, WOODWARD, HIRSCHBERG, and HOOKER, JJ.

A. B. Schleimer, for appellant.

Louis Levene, for .respondent.

JENKS, J.

The satisfactory opinion of Lynch, J., renders extended discussion unnecessary. The learned counsel for the appellant insists that section 139 of the municipal court act (Laws 1902, c. 580), simply grants an additional remedy, and that, notwithstanding that section, he has an action upon the facts in this case for conversion perforce of section 1, subd. 14, of the act, because conversion is an injury to personal property. Undoubtedly, conversion is an injury to personal property, but so are actions arising upon a breach of a written contract for the conditional sale of personal property, or based upon the hiring of personal property, or arising upon a chattel mortgage. So that the effect of his argument is that, although the act in express terms withholds, or rather restricts, the jurisdiction of the municipal court in such cases, yet the general provision of subdivision 14, § 1, absolutely confers it. This action, as pointed out by the learned municipal court justice, plainly arises upon the breach of a written contract for the conditional sale of personal property, and the relative relief and liability of the plaintiff and defendant in that forum must be measured and limited by the express provisions of the act which creates the court, establishes its powers, and limits its jurisdiction. Of course, the entire statute is to be read and reconciled, and any general expression therein must be regarded as limited and qualified by the particular provisions of the statute. Wormser v. Brown, 149 N. Y. 163, 43 N. E. 524; People v. Industrial Benefit Assn., 92 Hun, 311, 36 N. Y. Supp. 963, affirmed 149 N. Y. 606, 44 N. E. 1127. We do not sit to review the wisdom of legislation, and any considerations as to the policy of an act or as to the injustice of the provisions, however cogent in the mind of counsel, must be addressed to the legislative, not to the judicial, branch of government.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
§ 254.3 May I cover more than one facility in my OSRP? ( a ) Your OSRP may be for a single lease or facility or a group of leases or facilities. All the leases or facilities in your plan must have the same owner or operator (including affiliates) and must be located in the same BSEE Region (see definition of Regional OSRP in § 254.6).
( b ) Regional OSRPs must address all the elements required for an OSRP in subpart B, or subpart D of this part, as appropriate.
( c ) When developing a Regional OSRP, you may group leases or facilities subject to the approval of the Chief, OSPD, for the purposes of: ( 1 ) Calculating response times;
( 2 ) Determining quantities of response equipment;
( 3 ) Conducting oil-spill trajectory analyses;
( 4 ) Determining worst case discharge scenarios; and
( 5 ) Identifying areas of special economic and environmental importance that may be impacted and the strategies for their protection.
( d ) The Chief, OSPD, may specify how to address the elements of a Regional OSRP. The Chief, OSPD, also may require that Regional OSRPs contain additional information if necessary for compliance with appropriate laws and regulations.
[81 FR 36151, June 6, 2016]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER> 2
   <NAME> BERWYN INCOME FUND

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                       69,828,597
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                      58,012,898
<RECEIVABLES>                                  829,431
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                       0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              58,842,329
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                        17,112
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                    1,484,599
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                          1,501,711
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                    67,290,400
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                        5,735,576
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                                0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                      258,601
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                    (4,128,260)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                  (11,815,699)
<NET-ASSETS>                                57,340,618
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                            2,018,968
<INTEREST-INCOME>                            3,997,410
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                                 602,509
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                      5,413,869
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                   (4,613,483)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                      409,308
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                        1,209,694
<EQUALIZATION>                            (42,079,713)
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                    5,412,933
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                      2,296,408
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                  6,634,203
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                            406,121
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                    (46,282,952)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                            0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                          381,528
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                                602,509
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                        76,236,799
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                            10.72
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                   0.91
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                         (0.81)
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                            (0.82)
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                            0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                              10.00
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                    .77


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.3

Certification Required
by Rule 13a-14(a)

or Rule 15d-14(a)

I, Stephen K. Gardner,
certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of NGP Capital Resources Company; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Date: April
29, 2014





|/s/ STEPHEN K. GARDNER               
|-------------------------------------
|Stephen K. Gardner                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 13-2299

___________________________

Jose Soreque-Sandoval

lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner

v.

Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of United States

lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent

____________

Petition for Review of an Order of the

 Board of Immigration Appeals

____________

 Submitted: March 27, 2014

Filed: April 4, 2014

[Unpublished]

____________

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Mexican citizen Jose Soreque-Sandoval petitions for review of an order of the

Board ofImmigration Appeals (BIA), upholding an immigration judge’s denial of his

motion to reopen removal proceedings, and denying his request to remand his case

to the immigration judge. Upon careful review, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction

to review the agency’s decision not to exercise its discretionary “sua sponte”
authority to reopen the removal proceedings. See Tamenut v. Mukasey, 521 F.3d

1000, 1001, 1004-05 (8thCir. 2008) (en banc) (per curiam). We further conclude that

the BIA did not abuse its discretion either in upholding the immigration judge’s

determination that Soreque-Sandoval’s motion to reopen was untimely, see Valencia

v. Holder, 657 F.3d 745, 748-49 (8th Cir. 2011) (BIA did not abuse its discretion in

upholding denial of untimely motion to reopen), or in denying his request for a

remand, see Clifton v. Holder, 598 F.3d 486, 490-93 (8th Cir. 2010) (denial ofrequest

for remand is reviewed for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we deny the petition

for review. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
NRS 445B.300 Operating permit for source of air contaminant; notice and approval of proposed construction; administrative fees; failure of Commission or Department to act. 1. The Commission shall by regulation: (a) Require the person operating or responsible for the existence of each source of air contaminant, generally or within a specified class or classes, to apply for and obtain an operating permit for the source. (b) Require that written notice be given to the Director before the construction, installation, alteration or establishment of any source of air contaminant or of any specified class or classes of such sources, or the alteration of any device intended primarily to prevent or reduce air pollution. If within the time prescribed by regulation the Director determines that: (1) The proposed construction, installation, alteration or establishment will not be in accordance with the provisions of the plans, specifications and other design material required to be submitted under NRS 445B.100 to 445B.640 , inclusive, or applicable regulations; or (2) The design material or the construction itself is of such a nature that it patently cannot bring such source into complia nce with NRS 445B.100 to 445B.640 , inclus ive, or applicable regulations,



the Director shall issue an order prohibiting the construction, installation, alteration or establishment of the source or

sources of air contaminant. 2. The Commission shall by regulation provide for: (a) The issuance, renewal, modification, revocation and suspension of operating permits, and charge appropriate fees for their issuance in an amount sufficient to pay the expenses of administering NRS 445B.100 to 445B.640 , inclusive, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those sections. (b) The issuance of authorizations for the issuance of building permits pursuant to paragraph (a) of subsection 2 of NRS

445B.320

. 3. Any failure of the Commission or the Department to issue a regulation or order to prohibit any act does not relieve the person so operating from any legal responsibility for the construction, operation or existence of the source of air contamina nt. 4. All administrative fees collected by the Commission pursuant to subsection 2 must be accounted for separat ely and deposited in the State General Fund for credit to the Account for the Management of Air Quality. This subsection does not apply to any fees collected by political subdivisions or their agencies. (Added to NRS by 1971, 1196; A 1973, 1816; 1993, 285 3)

— (Substituted in revision for NRS 445.491)
Jaguar Cars Limited EMISSION DEFECT INFORMATION REPORT No. J10008D0A 

Causal part name: SENDER AND PUMP ASSEMBLY 

Causal part number: XR852872 

Issued: 19 May 2010 

Page 1 of 2 

Code of Federal Regulations. Title 40. Part 85. Subpart T. 

§85.1903 - Emissions Defect Information Report 

(c)(1) The manufacturers corporate name. 

Jaguar Cars Limited. 

(c)(2) A description of the defect. 

Drivers of Jaguar XJ and S-type vehicles experience poor or no-start, rough & uneven running and M.I.L. 

illumination. Dealer technicians identify a defective fuel pump as the root cause of the problem. 

(c)(3) A description of each class or category of vehicles potentially affected by the defect including make, 

model, model year, and such other information as may be required to identify these vehicles. 

See table in section (c)(4)(i) below. 

(c)(4) For each class or category of vehicle or engine described in response to paragraph (c)(3) of this section, 

the following shall also be provided: 

(c)(4)(i) The number of vehicles or engines known or estimated to have the defect and an explanation of the 

means by which this number was determined. 

MODEL 

YEAR MODEL TEST GROUP SALES DEFECTS 

2006 S-TYPE 3.0 6JCXV03.0DNK 5125 14 

2006 XJ8; XJ8L; VDP LWB; S-TYPE 4.2 6JCXV04.2DNK 6120 64 

2007 S-TYPE 3.0 7JCXV03.0DNK 1962 8 

2007 XJ8; XJ8L; VDP LWB; S-TYPE 4.2 7JCXV04.2DNK 2997 22 

2008 S-TYPE 3.0 8JCXV03.0DNK 1513 16 

2008 XJ8; XJ8L; VDP LWB; S-TYPE 4.2 8JCXV04.2DNK 4241 22 

2009 XJ 9JCXV04.2DNK 511 1

The above data was taken from Jaguar's warranty tracking report dated 2009 Q4. 

(c)(4)(ii) The address of the plant at which the potentially defective vehicles or engines were produced. 

Jaguar Castle Bromwich Plant, Birmingham, England. 

EPA EDIR# 4033 

5/25/2010
Jaguar Cars Limited EMISSION DEFECT INFORMATION REPORT No. J10008D0A 

Causal part name: SENDER AND PUMP ASSEMBLY 

Causal part number: XR852872 

Issued: 19 May 2010 

Page 2 of 2 

(c)(5) An evaluation of the emissions impact of the defect and a description of any driveability problems which a 

defective vehicle might exhibit. 

There is no adverse impact on emissions associated with this issue. 

Driveability is adversely affected by poor or no-start, rough & uneven running. 

This defect illuminates the M.I.L. 

(c)(6) Available emissions data which relate to the defect. 

There is no impact on emissions associated with this defect. 

(c)(7) An indication of any anticipated manufacturer follow-up. 

This issue is regarded as self campaigning, MIL illumination plus uneven engine running will prompt drivers to 

return the vehicle to a Jaguar dealer for rectification. 

EPA EDIR# 4033 

5/25/2010
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theAnnual Report of Market Leader, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jacqueline Davidson, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company. 

Dated: March 22, 2011