alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §41306. Injunctive relief sought by complainants

(a) In General.—After filing a complaint with the Federal Maritime Commission under section 41301 of this title, the complainant may bring a civil action in a district court of the United States to enjoin conduct in violation of this part.

(b) Venue.—The action must be brought in the judicial district in which—

(1) the Commission has brought a civil action against the defendant under section 41307(a) of this title; or

(2) the defendant resides or transacts business, if the Commission has not brought such an action.

(c) Remedies by Court.—After notice to the defendant, and a showing that the standards for granting injunctive relief by courts of equity are met, the court may grant a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction for a period not to exceed 10 days after the Commission has issued an order disposing of the complaint.

(d) Attorney Fees.—A defendant prevailing in a civil action under this section shall be allowed reasonable attorney fees to be assessed and collected as part of the costs of the action.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §7, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1546.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 41306 | 46 App.:1710(h)(2). | Pub. L. 98–237, §11(h)(2), Mar. 20, 1984, 98 Stat. 81. |

Section
**Exhibit      32.2**

**18      U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification**

| (1)    | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                    |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| (2)    | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

|                                   |                                               |         |
|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|--------------|
|                                   |                                               |
|                              |                                          |    |
| Date: March              13, 2006 | By:                                      |              |
|                                   | Stephen              K. Gardner                    |
|                                   | Chief              Financial Officer and Treasurer |
Exhibit 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying quarterly report of Liteglow
Industries, Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending
September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Spencer Krumholz,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



By:  /s/  Spencer Krumholz
   --------------------------------
Name:  Spencer Krumholz

Date:  October 31, 2002
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 26, 2012

p0919

Order 

September 26, 2012

144978

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144978

COA: 308300

Livingston CC: 11-019625-FH

JEFFREY HOWARD KLAASSEN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 9, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Livingston Circuit Court for 

reconsideration of the defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea in light of this 

Court’s decision in People v Cole, 491 Mich 325 (2012).

We do not retain jurisdiction.
Exhibit 31.1 

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Joseph Y. Liu, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Oplink Communications, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financing reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 12, 2003
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ANDRE WITHERSPOON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

Nos. 4D19-2503 and 4D19-2689

[October 22, 2020]

Consolidated appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial 

Circuit, Palm Beach County; Glenn D. Kelley, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 

502017CF011340A and 502016CF010088A.

Michael Salnick of Law Offices of Salnick & Fuchs PA, West Palm 

Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah Koenig, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, CONNER, and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Judicial Conference of the United States.

# ACTION:

Notice of Cancellation of Open Hearing.

# SUMMARY:

The following remote public hearing on proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure has been canceled: Appellate Rules Hearing on January 4, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Secretary, Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Judicial Conference of the United States, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus Circle NE, Suite 7-300, Washington, DC 20544, Telephone (202) 502-1820,                         *RulesCommittee_Secretary@ao.uscourts.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Announcements for this hearing were previously published in 85 FR 48562.

Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073.

Dated: December 8, 2020.

Rebecca A. Womeldorf,

Chief Counsel, Rules Committee Staff.

[FR Doc. 2020-27278 Filed 12-10-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
exv10w4






Exhibit 10.4



September 28, 2010




Travelport, LP

Travelport Global Distribution System B.V.

300 Galleria Parkway, N.W.

Atlanta, GA 30339




	 	 	 

	Re:

	 	Ninth Amendment to Subscriber Services Agreement, dated as of July 23, 2007 (“Agreement”)
between Travelport, LP, (“Travelport”), Travelport Global Distribution System B.V. ( “TGDS”
and, together with Travelport, collectively, “Galileo”) and Orbitz Worldwide, LLC
(“Subscriber”)





Ladies and Gentlemen:



This letter constitutes a Ninth Amendment (“Amendment”) to the Agreement referenced above.
Capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined shall be used as defined in the
Agreement.



Effective as September 1, 2010, (“Amendment Effective Date”), Galileo and Subscriber hereby agree
as follows:



1. Custom Terms and Conditions Revision. The Custom Terms and Conditions Attachment
(Galileo Services) — North America to the Agreement is amended as set forth in Exhibit A.



2. General. This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of and be
enforceable by the Parties hereto or their successors in interest, except as expressly provided in
the Agreement. Each Party to this Amendment agrees that, other than as expressly set out in this
Amendment, nothing in this Amendment is intended to alter the rights, duties and obligations of the
Parties under the Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect as amended hereby. In the
event of a conflict between the terms and conditions of this Amendment and the terms and conditions
of the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Amendment shall govern. This Amendment may be
executed by the Parties in separate counterparts and each counterpart shall be deemed to be an
original, but all such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument.







1









 







The Parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by the signatures of their respective
authorized representatives.






	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Travelport, LP
	Orbitz Worldwide, LLC	 	 	 	By: Travelport Holdings LLC as General Partner
	 
	Signature:

	 	/s/ Stephen C. Praven	 	 	 	Signature:	 	/s/ Scott Hyden	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	Stephen
C. Praven	 	 
	 	 	 	Name:
	 	Scott
Hyden
	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	VP,
Bus Dev	 	 	 	 	 	Title:	 	VP
Sales	 	 
	 

	 	Date:
	 	9/30/10	 	 	 	 	 	Date:	 	10/1/10	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Travelport Global Distribution System B.V.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Signature:	 	/s/ Marco van Ieperen	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Name:	 	Marco
van Ieperen	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Title:	 	Director	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Date:	 	30-09-2010	 	 








2
AUTHORIZATION

        Know all by these presents, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and
appoints each of John M. Lowber, Bonnie J. Paskvan, and Alfred J. Walker,
signing singly, the undersigned's true and lawful attorney-in-fact to:

(1) execute for and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned's capacity
as an affiliate of General Communication, Inc. (the "Company"), Form 4, in
accordance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
rules thereunder;

(2) do and perform any and all acts for and on behalf of the undersigned which
may be necessary or desirable to complete and execute any such Form 4, complete
and execute any amendment or amendments thereto, and timely file such form with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any stock exchange or
similar authority; and

(3) take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the
foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit to,
in the best interest of, or legally required by, the undersigned, it being
understood that the documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on behalf of the
undersigned pursuant to this Power of Attorney shall be in such form and shall
contain such terms and conditions as such attorney-in-fact may approve in such
attorney-in-fact's discretion.

        The undersigned hereby grants to each such attorney-in-fact full power
and authority to do and perform any and every act and thing whatsoever
requisite, necessary, or proper to be done in the exercise of any of the rights
and powers herein granted, as fully to all intents and purposes as the
undersigned might or could do if personally present, with full power of
substitution or revocation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such
attorney-in-fact, or such attorney-in-fact's substitute or substitutes, shall
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this power of attorney and the
rights and powers herein granted. The undersigned acknowledges that the
foregoing attorneys-in-fact, in serving in such capacity at the request of the
undersigned, are not assuming, nor is the Company assuming, any of the
undersigned's responsibilities to comply with Section 16 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.

        This Power of Attorney shall remain in full force and effect until the
undersigned is no longer required to file Form 4, with respect to the
undersigned's holdings of and transactions in securities issued by the Company,
unless earlier revoked by the undersigned in a signed writing delivered to the
foregoing attorneys-in-fact.


                                   1
<PAGE>
        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Power of Attorney to
be executed as of this 2nd day of October 2003.


                                 /s/
                                 ------------------------
                                 Signature


                                 Stephen A. Reinstadtler
                                 ------------------------
                                 Print Name
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00258-CV

R. P., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF LAMPASAS COUNTY

NO. 18,072, THE HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

The reporter’s record in this appeal was originally due to be filed on April 15, 2013. 

By request to this Court dated May 2, 2013, Shana Wise requested an extension of 10 days.

Effective March 1, 2012, amendments to the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 

adopted by Texas Supreme Court Miscellaneous Docket No. 12-9030 prohibit this Court from 

granting extensions of over 10 days for the filing of reporters’ records in accelerated appeals, 

including those from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). Further, 

any extensions of time granted for the filing of the reporters’ records may not exceed 30 days 

cumulatively. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.4(b)(2). Accordingly, Shana Wise is hereby ordered to file 

the reporter’s record in this case on or before May 13, 2013. If the record is not filed by that date, 

Wise may be required to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of court.
It is ordered on May 3, 2013.

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose
### §896. Erroneous cancellation of bona fide entries corrected

If, in the adjustment of said grants, it shall appear that the homestead or preemption entry of any bona fide settler has been erroneously canceled on account of any railroad grant or the withdrawal of public lands from market, such settler upon application shall be reinstated in all his rights and allowed to perfect his entry by complying with the public-land laws: Provided, That he has not located another claim or made an entry in lieu of the one so erroneously canceled: And provided also, That he did not voluntarily abandon said original entry: And provided further, That if any of said settlers do not renew their application to be reinstated within a reasonable time, to be fixed by the Secretary of the Interior, then all such unclaimed lands shall be disposed of under the public-land laws, with priority of right given to bona fide purchasers of said unclaimed lands, if any, and if there be no such purchasers, then to bona fide settlers residing thereon.

(Mar. 3, 1887, ch. 376, §3, 24 Stat. 557.)
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 7, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 48158]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-19075]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9843-9]

Intent To Grant an Exclusive Patent License

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of intent to grant an exclusive license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA hereby gives notice of its intent to grant an exclusive, 
royalty-bearing, revocable license to practice the invention described 
and claimed in the U.S. patent entitled PROCESS FOR THE BIODEGRADATION 
OF HYDROCARBONS AND ETHERS IN SUBSURFACE SOIL BY INTRODUCTION OF A 
SOLID OXYGEN SOURCE BY HYDRAULIC FRACTURING, filed as U.S. serial 
number 10/395,893 on March 25, 2003 and issued as U.S. Patent 7,252,986 
on August 7, 2007 to Foremost Environmental Solutions, L.L.C. of 
Denver, Colorado.

DATES: Comments on this notice must be received by EPA at the address 
listed below by August 22, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Scalise, Patent Attorney, Office 
of General Counsel (Mail Code 2377A), Environmental Protection Agency, 
Washington, DC 20460, telephone (202) 564-8303.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 207 (Patents) and 37 
CFR part 404 (U.S. Government patent licensing regulations), EPA hereby 
gives notice of its intent to grant an exclusive, royalty-bearing, 
revocable license to practice the invention described and claimed in 
the U.S. patent entitled PROCESS FOR THE BIODEGRADATION OF HYDROCARBONS 
AND ETHERS IN SUBSURFACE SOIL BY INTRODUCTION OF A SOLID OXYGEN SOURCE 
BY HYDRAULIC FRACTURING, filed as U.S. serial number 10/395,893 on 
March 25, 2003 and issued as U.S. Patent 7,252,986 on August 7, 2007 to 
Foremost Environmental Solutions, L.L.C. of Denver, Colorado.
    The proposed exclusive license will contain appropriate terms, 
limitations, and conditions to be negotiated in accordance with 35 
U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.5 and 404.7 of the U.S. Government patent 
licensing regulations.
    EPA will negotiate the final terms and conditions and grant the 
exclusive license, unless within 15 days from the date of this notice 
EPA receives, at the address below, written objections to the grant, 
together with supporting documentation. The documentation from 
objecting parties having an interest in practicing the above patent 
should include an application for an exclusive or nonexclusive license 
with the information set forth in 37 CFR 404.8. The EPA Patent Attorney 
and other EPA officials will review all written responses and then make 
recommendations on a final decision to the Director or Deputy Director 
of the National Risk Management Research Laboratory who have been 
delegated the authority to issue patent licenses under EPA Delegation 
1-55.

    Dated: July 31, 2013.
Kevin Miller,
Acting Associate General Counsel, General Law Office.
[FR Doc. 2013-19075 Filed 8-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
! I V- ] I • • . . •, . ; \J \ ilrt i •,\j\\ 

# O Memorandu m U.S
. Departmen t o f Transportatio n Offic e o f th e Secretar

y o f Transportatio n Subject : Reques t

for Extensio n a

t Bradfor d(DOT-OST-2003

- Date : 14528) , Oi l City/Frankli n (DOT-OST-1997-2523 ) an d DuBoi s (DOT-OST-2004-17617) , Pennsylvania ; an d Jamestown , Nev^Yor]jKDOT76sT-20p3-14950 ) From . Denni s J . D^any , Chie f ^ Repl y t o HA S & Domesti c Analysi s Division , X-5 3 Attn , of : To : Docket s Operations , M-3 0 Jun e 17 , 201 0

O M MEM O 20(e»-7 2 Kevi n Schlemmer , X-5 3 Ext . 6317 6

Orde r 2010-5-22 , May 19 , 2010 , requeste dproposal s for Essentia l Ai r

Servic e (EAS ) at th e above-name dcommunities , t o b e submitte db y Jun e 22 . O n Jun e 16 , th e Departmen t receive dareques t

for a n extensio n fro mGulfstrea m Internationa l Airlines , Inc . (Gulfstream ) t o exten dth e submissio n deadlin e t o Jun e 30 , i n orde r t o harmoniz e th e dat e with th e pendin g submissio n deadlin e dat e for proposal s a

t Massena , Ogdensburg , an dWatertown , Ne w York (Orde r 2010-5-32 , May 28 , 2010) . Gulfstrea mstate s that

i t polle dth e airport

manager s i n th e four

communitie s an dthe y expresse dsupport

for it s extensio n request . W e ar e hereb y grantin g th e extensio n basedo n Gulfstream' s reques t an dth e suppor t

o f th e communitie s involved . Proposal s for al l four communitie s liste dabove ar e no w du e n o late r than Wednesday , Jun e 30 , 2010 .
§ 964.420 Resident board member may be elected. ( a ) *General.* Residents directly assisted by a public housing agency may elect a resident board member if provided for in the public housing agency plan, adopted in accordance with 24 CFR part 903.
( b ) *Notice to residents.* The public housing agency must provide residents with at least 30 days advance notice for nominations and elections. The notice should include a description of the election procedures, eligibility requirements, and dates of nominations and elections. Any election procedures devised by the public housing agency must facilitate fair elections.