alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Computerized Thermal
Imaging, Inc., (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Richard V. Secord, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Richard V. Secord
-------------------------------
 Richard V. Secord
 Chairman of the Board and Chief
 Executive Officer

Date:  February 13, 2004
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 99.6



         TURBODYNE ANNOUNCES FINANCIAL RESULTS RELEASE SCHEDULE FOR 2000


CARPINTERIA, CA - FEBRUARY 4, 2000 - Turbodyne Technologies Inc. (EASDAQ:TRBD)
announces the following schedule for the release of Turbodyne's financial
results:

Annual Financial Results 1999 - March 30, 2000; first quarter 2000 - May 15,
2000; second quarter and first half 2000 - August 14, 2000; third quarter and
nine months 2000 - November 14, 2000.

The date of the 2000 Annual Shareholder Meeting is Friday, November 3, 2000.

Turbodyne Technologies Inc., a California based high technology company,
specializes in the development of performance enhancement, fuel economy and
pollution control products for internal combustion engines. Turbodyne
Technologies Inc.'s headquarters is located in Carpinteria, CA; the European
business location is Frankfurt, Germany.

Turbodyne's World  Wide  Web address is: www.turbodyne.com

Contacts:

Corporate Communications, Peter Weichselbraun (800) 566-1130
VP Group Finance - Investor Relations, Ken Fitzpatrick (800) 566-1130
European Business Development, Markus Kumbrink +49-69-975-44-665
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

          I, Harold F. Zagunis, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Sequoia
Residential Funding, Inc., a Delaware corporation, hereby certify that:

          1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A, and all reports
on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of the
Certificates for periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc.;

          2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

          3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these
reports;

          4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement
included in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance
with the terms of the pooling and servicing agreement, and except as disclosed
in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
agreement; and

          5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing agreement, that is included
in these reports.

          In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Morgan Stanley
Dean Witter Credit Corporation, as Servicer, GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.,
as Servicer, Cendant Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer, Bank of America, N.A.,
as Servicer, GMAC Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer, and Countrywide Home Loans,
Inc., as Servicer.

Date: May 31, 2005

/s/ Harold F. Zagunis
--------------------------------------------
Signature
Name: Harold F. Zagunis
Title: Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
**Docket Number: F AA** **- 2012**  **- 0488** 



### . **Contacts.** With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted **Date** Response **National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti**  5/12/11 **Regional Airline Associatio n**  **Connie Arnold**  5/12/11 **Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman**  5/12/11 **ATA Joe White**  5/12/11
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.504 Hydrogen sulfide.

When a well-completion operation is conducted in zones known to contain hydrogen sulfide (H2S) or in zones where the presence of H2S is unknown (as defined in § 250.490 of this part), the lessee shall take appropriate precautions to protect life and property on the platform or completion unit, including, but not limited to operations such as blowing the well down, dismantling wellhead equipment and flow lines, circulating the well, swabbing, and pulling tubing, pumps, and packers. The lessee shall comply with the requirements in § 250.490 of this part as well as the appropriate requirements of this subpart.
p.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

96) IV-C-62 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:56 AM Sheet 96 of 232 
P.2 

vT _ <* 

* A r 

-5T-G-6Z 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

FEB 9 1988 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Honorable Frank J. Guarini 

House of Representatives 

Washington, D. C. 20515 

Dear Mr. Guarini: 

Thank you for your letter of January 26, 1988, expressing 

your views on EPA's proposed regulations to control vapors 

generated during the refueling of motor vehicles by the use of 

onboard canisters. 

This proposal involves complex and controversial issues, 

and we have spent a great deal of time analyzing the environmental and economic impacts. We held a public hearing on the 

proposal this past October, and we expect to receive many 

additional comments by the time the comment period closes on 

February 11, 1988. A copy of your letter will be placed in 

the public docket for this rulemaking, and we do thank you 

for taking the time to comment on this important issue. 

Sincerely yours, 

„.,-.-. ^'.y-j^', \J~ 

Richard D. Wilson 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources 

cc: Docket A-87-11
================================================================================
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual Report of Quantum Energy Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form  10-KSB for the fiscal  year ended  February  28,  2007,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Shane
Lowry,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




/s/ Shane Lowry
------------------------
Shane Lowry
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
June 11, 2007

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §13505. Transportation furthering a primary business

(a) In General.—Neither the Secretary nor the Board has jurisdiction under this part over the transportation of property by motor vehicle when—

(1) the property is transported by a person engaged in a business other than transportation; and

(2) the transportation is within the scope of, and furthers a primary business (other than transportation) of the person.

(b) Corporate Families.—

(1) In general.—Neither the Secretary nor the Board has jurisdiction under this part over transportation of property by motor vehicle for compensation provided by a person who is a member of a corporate family for other members of such corporate family.

(2) Definition.—In this section, "corporate family" means a group of corporations consisting of a parent corporation and all subsidiaries in which the parent corporation owns directly or indirectly a 100 percent interest.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §103, Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 861.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 10524 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.603 Emergency shutdown system.

When well-workover operations are conducted on a well with the tree removed, an emergency shutdown system (ESD) manually controlled station shall be installed near the driller's console or well-servicing unit operator's work station, except when there is no other hydrocarbon-producing well or other hydrocarbon flow on the platform.
No. 7961.

#### The Findlay, Ft. Wayne & Western Railway Co. *v.*Kindell.

(Decided December 8, 1903.)

Error to Circuit Court of Hancock county.

*Mr. H. F. Burket*and *Messrs. Watts & Moore,*for plaintiff in error.

*559*Mr. John Poe*and *Messrs. Gable & Parmenter,*for-defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed on authority of *The B. & O. Ry. Co.*v. *Glenn,*66 Ohio St., 395.

Spear, Davis, Shauck, Price and Crew, JJ., concur.
#### David Naughton *v.*Alan Hager

*Edward N. Lerner,*in support of the petition.

*Michael P. Foley, Jr.,*in opposition.

Decided December 14, 1992

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 181 (AC 10551), is denied.
**Exhibit 31.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 I, Richard Blass, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
 
 1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Delta Financial Corporation;2.
Base on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, periods presented in this report;4.
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and5.
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information andb.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. 
  Date:  November 10, 2004
 
 
 
 
 Richard Blass
 *Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*
### §§40, 41. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 40 and 41, relating to Territory of Alaska, were omitted in view of admission of Alaska into the Union.

Section 40, act June 6, 1900, ch. 786, §31, 31 Stat. 332, related to court rooms and offices of civil government.

Section 41, acts Jan. 27, 1905, ch. 277, §1, 33 Stat. 616; May 14, 1906, ch. 2458, §1, 34 Stat. 192; Feb. 6, 1909, ch. 80, §7, 35 Stat. 601; Mar. 3, 1913, ch. 109, 37 Stat. 728, related to deposits to Alaska fund in Treasury Department.
### §748. Conveyance by President to people of lands, buildings, etc.

The President may, from time to time, in his discretion, convey to the people of Puerto Rico, such lands, buildings, or interests in lands, or other property now owned by the United States, and within the territorial limits of Puerto Rico as in his opinion are no longer needed for purposes of the United States. And he may from time to time accept by legislative grant from Puerto Rico any lands, buildings, or other interests or property which may be needed for public purposes by the United States.

(Mar. 2, 1917, ch. 145, §7, 39 Stat. 954; May 17, 1932, ch. 190, 47 Stat. 158.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of proviso clause of section 7 of act Mar. 2, 1917. The text preceding the proviso clause of section 7 is classified to section 747 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Puerto Rico" substituted in text for "Porto Rico" pursuant to act May 17, 1932, which is classified to section 731a of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

For delegation to Secretary of the Interior of authority vested in President by this section, see Ex. Ord. No. 10250, eff. June 5, 1951, 16 F.R. 5385, set out under section 301 of Title 3, The President.
#### Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Petitioner, v State Division of Human Rights, Respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the 0 Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated July 25, 1977, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights, dated May 24, 1976, which, *inter alia,*found that the petitioner had discriminated against the complainant, Gae Marie Close, on the basis of her sex with respect to the terms, conditions and privileges of her employment. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The disallowance of pregnancy-related disability benefits violated section 296 (subd 1, par [a]) of the Executive Law (see *Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd.,*41 NY2d 84). Petitioner’s claim that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) (US Code, tit 29, § 1001 *et seq.)*pre-empted the Division of Human Rights from investigating this claim is without merit. Although the Congress fashioned a broad pre-emptive policy when it passed ERISA (see US Code, tit 29, § 1144, subd [a]), the legislative history behind the passage of the retirement program leads us to conclude that Congress did not intend to narrow the jurisdiction of those Federal and State agencies whose duty it is to regulate unlawful employment practices. The statements of Senator Walter Móndale and Representative Bella Abzug, made in their respective houses of Congress, indicate that antidiscrimination amendments to the *823ERISA legislation were only withdrawn upon assurance from the ERISA draftsmen that discrimination claims would continue to fall within the jurisdiction of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission under terms of existing law (see 119 Cong Rec S 30409-10; 120 Cong Rec H 4726). Thus, it is clear that Congress did not intend to disturb the established structures for administering such claims. Since title 7 of the Civil Rights Act has clearly not been impaired by ERISA (see US Code, tit 29, § 1144, subd [d]; tit 42, § 2000e-7), and since it vests concurrent jurisdiction in the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and similar State-level agencies to investigate these claims (see, e.g., US Code, tit 42, § 2000e-4, subd [g], par [1]; § 2000e-7), we find that the jurisdiction of the State Division of Human Rights was not pre-empted by ERISA. We have reviewed those cases in which the Federal courts have restrained the States from regulating employee-benefit plans and found that they were instances in which the beneficiary was fully protected under the terms of ERISA (see, e.g., *Azzaro v Harnett,*414 F Supp 473). However, as ERISA made no attempt to deal with fair employment practices, there is little reason to restrict the authority of the agencies responsible for those problems. We have considered the petitioner’s other arguments and found them to be without merit. Hopkins, J. P., Martuscello, Latham and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
#### § 27.38 Tests to determine adequacy of windows and lenses.

*Impact tests.* A 4-pound cylindrical weight with a one-inch diameter hemispherical striking surface will be dropped (free fall) to strike the window or lens in its mounting or the equivalent thereof at or near the center. At least three out of four samples shall withstand the impact according to the following table:

| Overall lens diameter (inches) | Height of fall (inches) |
| --- | --- |
| Less than 4 | 6 |
| 4 to 5 | 9 |
| 5 to 6 | 15 |
| Greater than 6 | 24 |

Lenses or windows of smaller diameter than 1 inch may be tested by alternate methods at the discretion of MSHA.
**EXHIBIT 15.1**

 

[Letterhead of Maples and Calder] 

 

June 28, 2005 

 

The9 Limited 

30/F CITIC Square 

No. 1168 Nanjing Road (West) 

Shanghai 200041, People’s Republic of China 

 

Dear Sirs, 

 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the heading “Taxation” in The9 Limited’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year endedDecember 31, 2004, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in the month of June 2005. 

 

 

Yours faithfully, 

 

 

/s/ Maples and Calder
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of CB Richard Ellis Realty Trust (the
Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack A. Cuneo, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    JACK A.
CUNEOJack A. Cuneo President and Chief Executive Officer


June 26, 2009
§ 906.47 Environmental requirements. ( a ) *General.* HUD environmental regulations at 24 CFR part 58 apply to this part, unless, under § 58.11 of this title, HUD itself performs the environmental review under 24 CFR part 50. The PHA conducting a homeownership program under this part must comply with this section and part 50 or 58, as applicable.
( b ) *Assistance to facilitate the purchase of homes.* Where the PHA's homeownership program involves assistance provided under the 1937 Act solely to assist homebuyers to purchase existing dwelling units or dwelling units under construction, an environmental review is not required under part 58 or part 50 of this title. However, the requirements of § 58.6 or § 50.19(b)(15) of this title are still applicable.
( c ) *Public housing units in the PHA's inventory.* Before the PHA rehabilitates or repairs units in its inventory for use for homeownership, or expends or commits HUD or local funds for such activities, the responsible entity must comply with part 58 and the PHA, where required, must submit and receive HUD approval of its request for release of funds, or HUD must have completed any part 50 environmental review and notified the PHA of its approval of the property. HUD may not release funds under this part before the appropriate approval is obtained.
( d ) *Units to be acquired with federal funds and used for public housing homeownership.* A PHA may not enter into any contract for acquisition of real property to be used in a homeownership program unless the required environmental reviews have been performed and approvals have been obtained.
( e ) *Specific units unidentified.* Where the PHA's homeownership program contemplates acquisition of properties not identified at the time of submission, the PHA must certify that it will comply with this section, including paragraph (f) of this section, prior to such acquisition or construction. HUD may conditionally approve such a homeownership program; however, HUD will not give final approval of any site or unit until the required environmental review has been completed.
( f ) *Information.* The PHA shall supply all relevant information necessary for the responsible entity, or HUD, if applicable, to perform the environmental review for each property included in the homeownership program, and, if necessary, shall carry out mitigating measures or select alternate eligible properties. Where HUD performs the environmental review, the PHA shall comply with 24 CFR 50.3(h).
( g ) *Non-exclusivity.* Nothing in this section relieves the participating PHA, and its partners and contractors, from complying with all requirements of 24 CFR part 50 or part 58, as applicable.