alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1. |   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and |
|----|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. |   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      Registrant. |
|----|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                                                       |   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | By:    | /s/ Bin      Wang       |   |
|   |   | Bin      Wang                                              |   |
|   |   | Chief      Executive Officer                               |   |
|   |   | (Principal      Executive Officer)                         |   |

|   |   |                                               |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | By:    | /s/ Ming      Fen Liu     |   |
|   |   | Ming      Fen Liu                                  |   |
|   |   | Chief      Financial Officer                       |   |
|   |   | (Principal      Accounting and Financial Officer)  |   |
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-1 No. 333-119852 and Form S-4 No. 333-119231) of Nalco Finance Holdings
LLC and in the related Prospectus of our reports dated February 28, 2006, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Nalco Finance
Holdings LLC, Nalco Finance Holdings LLC management's assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Nalco Finance
Holdings LLC, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2005.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 28, 2006
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ugent Binns, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on March 25,1976, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to *949withdraw as counsel granted (see *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833). No opinion. Concur—Silverman, J. P., Fein, Lane, Sandler and Sullivan, JJ.
#### DOUGHERTY, Appellant, v. NORTHERN PAC. RY. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 10, 1905.)

Action by William Dougherty against the Northern Pacific Railway Company. H. Siegrist, Jr., for appellant. F. B. Jennings, for respondent. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
### **CHAPTER 443—INSURANCE**

Sec.
44301.
Definitions.
44302.
General authority.
44302a.
Temporary insurance.
44303.
Coverage.
44304.
Reinsurance.
44305.
Insuring United States Government property.
44306.
Premiums and limitations on coverage and claims.
44307.
Revolving fund.
44308.
Administrative.
44309.
Civil actions.
44310.
Ending effective date.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2022**—Pub. L. 117–328, div. Q, §103(c), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5252, added item 44302a.
#### BRADY v. KENNEDY et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 6, 1903.)

Action by William A. Brady against James C. Kennedy and others.

No opinion. Motion for leave to withdraw appeal granted, upon payment of $10 costs.
Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), Joseph Y.Liu, Chief Executive Officer of Oplink Communications, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that,to the best of his knowledge:**1. **The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007, to whichthis Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and**2. **The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition at the end of the period covered by the Quarterly Report and results ofoperations of the Company for the periods covered by the Quarterly Report.**In Witness Whereof,**the undersigned has set his hands hereto as of the 8th day of February, 2008.        /s/ Joseph Y. Liu   Joseph Y. Liu   Chief Executive Officer    This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SECand is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Actof 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing.
```

[114th Congress Public Law 299]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 130 STAT. 1512]]

Public Law 114-299
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   2886 Sandy Plains Road in Marietta, Georgia, as the ``Marine Lance 
 Corporal Squire `Skip' Wells Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Dec. 16, 
                         2016 -  [H.R. 5612]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. MARINE LANCE CORPORAL SQUIRE ``SKIP'' WELLS POST OFFICE 
                              BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2886 Sandy Plains Road in Marietta, Georgia, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Marine Lance Corporal Squire `Skip' Wells Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Marine 
Lance Corporal Squire `Skip' Wells Post Office Building''.

    Approved December 16, 2016.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5612:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016):
            Sept. 20, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 9, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley
Cornerstone Fund IV L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Lee
Horwitz, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management Corporation,
the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.








By: /s/Lee Horwitz

Name:	  Lee Horwitz
Title: Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management Corporation,
       the general partner of the Partnership

Date:	  November 14, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3549 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3549

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
    210 West 3rd Avenue in Warren, Pennsylvania, as the ``William F. 
                  Clinger, Jr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

     The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 210 
West 3rd Avenue in Warren, Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated 
as the ``William F. Clinger, Jr. Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``William F. Clinger, Jr. Post 
Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
### §50503. Oceanographic research vessels

An oceanographic research vessel (as defined in section 2101 of this title) is deemed not to be engaged in trade or commerce.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(b), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1567.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 50503 | 46 App.:441. | Pub. L. 89–99, §§1, 3, 4, July 30, 1965, 79 Stat. 424. |
| | 46 App.:443. | |
| | 46 App.:444. | |

Section

The definitions of "oceanographic research vessel" and "scientific personnel" in 46 App. U.S.C. 441 are omitted because substantially the same definitions are already in 46 U.S.C. 2101.

The text of 46 App. U.S.C. 444 is omitted because section 10101(3) of title 46, which defines "seaman" for purposes of part G of subtitle II of title 46, already contains an exception for scientific personnel. Title 53 of the Revised Statutes, referred to [in] 46 App. U.S.C. 444, was previously codified principally in part G of subtitle II of title 46.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of IMPSAT Fiber Networks on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Héctor Alonso, Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the
registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date: May 23, 2005



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ Héctor Alonso      
| |  | Héctor Alonso          
| |  | Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
### §10702. Authority for rail carriers to establish rates, classifications, rules, and practices

A rail carrier providing transportation or service subject to the jurisdiction of the Board under this part shall establish reasonable—

(1) rates, to the extent required by section 10707, divisions of joint rates, and classifications for transportation and service it may provide under this part; and

(2) rules and practices on matters related to that transportation or service.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §102(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 810.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 10702, Pub. L. 95–473, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1372; Pub. L. 103–180, §6(a), Dec. 3, 1993, 107 Stat. 2050; Pub. L. 103–311, title II, §206(a), Aug. 26, 1994, 108 Stat. 1684, related to authority for carriers to establish rates, classifications, rules, and practices, prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a). See sections 10702 and 15502 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
FOREBEARANCE AGREEMENT

      AGREEMENT, dated as of August 31, 2007, by and between [Noteholder]
("Payee") and ABC Funding, Inc. (the "Company").

                                R E C I T A L S:

      The Company issued its 10% Convertible Promissory Note in the principal
amount of $________, dated , 2006 in favor of Payee (the "Note");

      Payment of the principal of and interest accrued on the Note is due August
31, 2007. The Company has requested, and for good and valuable consideration
provided for herein, the Payee has agreed that they shall forebear from taking
any action to collect upon the Note prior to February 28, 2008.

      NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

      1. All defined terms set forth herein shall have the same meaning ascribed
thereto in the Note.

      2. The Note is amended to provide that (i) the Maturity Date of the Note
shall be February 28, 2008, or, if earlier, the date of consummation by the
Company of a merger, combination or sale of substantially all of its assets or
the purchase by a single entity or person or group of affiliated entities or
persons of more than fifty (50%) percent of the voting stock of the Company (a
"Merger Transaction" and (ii) from September 1, 2007, until the date of payment
thereof in full, interest shall accrue on the outstanding principal amount of
the Note at the rate of twelve (12%) per cent per annum and shall be paid as set
forth in the Note.

      3. Promptly following execution and delivery of this Agreement, the
Company shall issue and deliver to Payee such number of restricted shares of the
Company's Common Stock as is determined by multiplying the Principal Amount of
the Note by .one-tenth ($.10) and dividing such sum by $0.50.

      4. Payee represents and warrants that it is the holder of the Note, and
that none of Payee's rights thereunder have been assigned and that no Event of
Default has occurred under the Note.

      5. This Extension Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts,
which together shall be treated as a single instrument. Except as set forth
herein, all of the terms and conditions of the Note shall remain in full force
and effect.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the
date first above written.

ABC Funding, Inc.


By: _____________________________                 ______________________________
    Name:                                         [NOTE HOLDER]
    Position:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Harold Davis-El, Appellant.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied on condition that appellant argue or submit the appeal at the January 1961 Term. The appeal is ordered to be placed on the calendar for said term. Appellant’s time to perfect his appeal is enlarged' accordingly. Nolan, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors

HouseValues, Inc 

We consentto the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-121294) on Form S-8 of HouseValues, Inc. of our reports dated March 3, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of HouseValues, Inc. and subsidiaries as ofDecember 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, therelated financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2005, which reports appear in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of HouseValues, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Seattle, WA 

March 3, 2006
#### § 1210.50 What is the purpose of this subpart?

The purpose of this subpart is to explain royalty reporting requirements when energy and mineral resources are removed from Federal and Indian oil and gas and geothermal leases and federally approved agreements. This includes leases and agreements located onshore and on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS).
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to**

**Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Héctor Alonso, certify that: 

 

1. Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IMPSAT Fiber Networks, Inc. (the “Registrant”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theRegistrant and we have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared, 

 

(b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8283 (June 5, 2003)], 

 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation, and 

 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) all adversely significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting. 

 

 

August 15, 2005
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LARRY CHARLES CLEVELAND, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

CORINA NGO CHIN, M.D., sued in their 

Individual capacities; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-56448 

D.C. No. 2:17-cv-01893-DSF-GJS 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 12, 2018**

Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Larry Charles Cleveland appeals pro se from the 

district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging retaliation 

and deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

SEP 20 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

Wilhelm v. Rotman, 680 F.3d 1113, 1118 (2012). We affirm in part, reverse in 

part, and remand.

The district court properly dismissed Cleveland’s deliberate indifference 

claims against defendants Chin, Finander, Frances, Hughes, and Alvarez because 

Cleveland failed to allege facts sufficient to show that any defendant knew of and 

disregarded an excessive risk to his health. See Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 

1057-58 (9th Cir. 2004) (a prison official acts with deliberate indifference only if 

he or she knows of and disregards an excessive risk to the prisoner’s health; mere 

negligence is insufficient to establish deliberate indifference). 

The district court properly dismissed Cleveland’s deliberate indifference 

claims against defendants Lois and Jones because Cleveland failed to allege that he 

was harmed by the delay in treatment. See Hallett v. Morgan, 296 F.3d 732, 746 

(9th Cir. 2002) (prisoner alleging deliberate indifference based on delay in 

treatment must show that delay led to further injury).

The district court dismissed Cleveland’s deliberate indifference and 

retaliation claims against defendant Fitter for failure to state a claim. However, 

Cleveland alleged that defendant Fitter intentionally discontinued plaintiff’s pain 

medication because Cleveland had complained about Fitter’s colleagues to the 

medical board. Liberally construed, these allegations “are sufficient to warrant 

ordering [Fitter] to file an answer.” Wilhelm, 680 F.3d at 1116; see also Rhodes v. 
3 

Robinson, 408 F.3d 559, 567-68 (9th Cir. 2005) (setting forth elements of a First 

Amendment retaliation claim in the prison context); Hunt v. Dental Dep’t, 865 

F.2d 198, 201 (9th Cir. 1989) (concluding that defendant acted with deliberate 

indifference where his purposeful act caused the prisoner to suffer unnecessary and 

wanton infliction of pain). We reverse and remand for further proceedings on 

these claims against Fitter only. 

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.