alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §53517. Reports

(a) In General.—Within 120 days after the close of each calendar year, the Secretary of Transportation and the Secretary of Commerce each shall provide the Secretary of the Treasury a written report on the capital construction funds under the particular Secretary's jurisdiction for the calendar year.

(b) Contents.—The report shall state the name and taxpayer identification number of each person—

(1) establishing a capital construction fund during the calendar year;

(2) maintaining a capital construction fund on the last day of the calendar year;

(3) terminating a capital construction fund during the calendar year;

(4) making a deposit to or withdrawal from a capital construction fund during the calendar year, and the amount of the deposit or withdrawal; or

(5) having been determined during the calendar year to have failed to fulfill a substantial obligation under a capital construction fund agreement to which the person is a party.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1600.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 53517 | 46 App.:1177(m). | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title VI, §607(m), as added Pub. L. 99–514, §261(d), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2214. |

Section
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of IMPSAT Fiber Networks on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Héctor Alonso, Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge, that:



1. The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date: November 14, 2005



/s/ Héctor AlonsoHéctor AlonsoChief Financial Officer




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
### §1423l. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Oct. 5, 1992, Pub. L. 102–381, title I, 106 Stat. 1392, which authorized Territorial and local governments of Guam to make purchases through General Services Administration, was from the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993, and was not repeated in subsequent appropriation acts. See section 1469e of this title. Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Nov. 13, 1991, Pub. L. 102–154, title I, 105 Stat. 1007.

Nov. 5, 1990, Pub. L. 101–512, title I, 104 Stat. 1932.

Oct. 23, 1989, Pub. L. 101–121, title I, 103 Stat. 716.

Sept. 27, 1988, Pub. L. 100–446, title I, 102 Stat. 1797.

Dec. 22, 1987, Pub. L. 100–202, §101(g) [title I], 101 Stat. 1329–213, 1329–231.

Oct. 18, 1986, Pub. L. 99–500, §101(h) [title I], 100 Stat. 1783–242, 1783–258, and Oct. 30, 1986, Pub. L. 99–591, §101(h) [title I], 100 Stat. 3341–242, 3341–258.

Dec. 19, 1985, Pub. L. 99–190, §101(d) [title I], 99 Stat. 1224, 1238.

Oct. 12, 1984, Pub. L. 98–473, title I, §101(c) [title I], 98 Stat. 1837, 1851.

Nov. 4, 1983, Pub. L. 98–146, title I, 97 Stat. 931.

Dec. 30, 1982, Pub. L. 97–394, title I, 96 Stat. 1979.

Dec. 23, 1981, Pub. L. 97–100, title I, 95 Stat. 1401.

Dec. 12, 1980, Pub. L. 96–514, title I, 94 Stat. 2969.

Nov. 27, 1979, Pub. L. 96–126, title I, 93 Stat. 965.

Oct. 17, 1978, Pub. L. 95–465, title I, 92 Stat. 1289.

July 26, 1977, Pub. L. 95–74, title I, 91 Stat. 295.

July 31, 1976, Pub. L. 94–373, title I, 90 Stat. 1052.

Dec. 23, 1975, Pub. L. 94–165, title I, 89 Stat. 987.

Aug. 31, 1974, Pub. L. 93–404, title I, 88 Stat. 812.

Oct. 4, 1973, Pub. L. 93–120, title I, 87 Stat. 433.

Aug. 10, 1972, Pub. L. 92–369, title I, 86 Stat. 512.

Aug. 10, 1971, Pub. L. 92–76, title I, 85 Stat. 233.

July 31, 1970, Pub. L. 91–361, title I, 84 Stat. 673.

Oct. 29, 1969, Pub. L. 91–98, title I, 83 Stat. 151.

July 26, 1968, Pub. L. 90–425, title I, 82 Stat. 430.

June 24, 1967, Pub. L. 90–28, title I, 81 Stat. 63.

May 31, 1966, Pub. L. 89–435, title I, 80 Stat. 174.

June 28, 1965, Pub. L. 89–52, title I, 79 Stat. 179.

July 7, 1964, Pub. L. 88–356, title I, 78 Stat. 278.

July 26, 1963, Pub. L. 88–79, title I, 77 Stat. 102.

Aug. 9, 1962, Pub. L. 87–578, title I, 76 Stat. 339.

Aug. 3, 1961, Pub. L. 87–122, title I, 75 Stat. 250.

May 13, 1960, Pub. L. 86–455, title I, 74 Stat. 112.

June 23, 1959, Pub. L. 86–60, title I, 73 Stat. 101.

June 4, 1958, Pub. L. 85–439, title I, 72 Stat. 163.

July 1, 1957, Pub. L. 85–77, title I, 71 Stat. 265.

June 13, 1956, ch. 380, title I, 70 Stat. 264.

June 16, 1955, ch. 147, title I, 69 Stat. 149.

July 1, 1954, ch. 446, title I, 68 Stat. 372.

July 31, 1953, ch. 298, title I, 67 Stat. 273.

July 9, 1952, ch. 597, title I, 66 Stat. 457.

Aug. 31, 1951, ch. 375, title I, 65 Stat. 263.

Sept. 6, 1950, ch. 896, Ch. VII, title I, 64 Stat. 694.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6958

THEBOYETTE JEFFERIES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JAMES B. FRENCH,

Respondent - Appellee,

and

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,

Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-647-5-BO)

Submitted: November 18, 1999 Decided: November 23, 1999

Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Theboyette Jefferies, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Theboyette Jefferies seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. See Jefferies v. French, No.

CA-98-647-5-BO (E.D.N.C. July 7, 1999). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §866. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Apr. 12, 1900, ch. 191, §35, 31 Stat. 85, provided that all proceedings in Supreme Court of United States to review decisions of Supreme Court of Puerto Rico and the District Court of the United States for Puerto Rico, should be conducted in the English language.
Second Department,

May, 1977

(May 12, 1977) 

#### Adam Nardelli, Respondent, v Melvin Steinberg et al., Appellants.

Motion by respondent to resettle and clarify an order of this court dated January 24, 1977, which decided an appeal from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered November 7, 1975 and (2) an order of the same court dated December 10, 1975. Motion denied. On the court’s own motion, its decision dated January 24, 1977 is amended by striking the third and fourth paragraphs therefrom and by substituting the following: "Judgment reversed, on the law, insofar as it awards exemplary damages, without costs or disbursements, and the cause of action seeking such damages is dismissed. Judgment reversed, on the law, insofar as it awards compensatory damages, without costs or disbursements, and new trial granted with respect to the issue of compensatory damages only, with costs to abide the event, unless, within 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon, plaintiff shall serve and file in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in his favor to $5,000, representing compensatory damages, and to the entry of an amended judgment accordingly, in which event, the judgment in his favor, as so reduced and amended, is affirmed, as to the compensatory damages, without costs or disbursements. The findings of fact as to liability are affirmed. The award of compensatory damages was excessive to the extent indicated herein. The award of exemplary damages was inappropriate under the circumstances.” Order dated January 24, 1977 entered on said decision, amended accordingly. Hopkins, J. P., Cohalan, Shapiro and Suozzi, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 1206
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1206 (formerly part 206) appear at 67 FR 19111, Apr. 18, 2002.

§ 1206.459 Allocation of washed coal. ( a ) When coal is subjected to washing, the washed coal must be allocated to the leases from which it was extracted.
( b ) When the net output of coal from a washing plant is derived from coal obtained from only one lease, the quantity of washed coal allocable to the lease will be based on the net output of the washing plant.
( c ) When the net output of coal from a washing plant is derived from coal obtained from more than one lease, unless determined otherwise by BLM, the quantity of net output of washed coal allocable to each lease will be based on the ratio of measured quantities of coal delivered to the washing plant and washed from each lease compared to the total measured quantities of coal delivered to the washing plant and washed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ELIZABETH ELTING, § § No. 90, 2018 Petitioner Below, § Appellant, § Court Below—Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware v. § § C.A. Nos. 9700 and 10449 PHILIP R. SHAWE and SHIRLEY § SHAWE, § § Respondents Below, § Appellees. § Submitted: April 18, 2018 Decided: May 3, 2018 Before STRINE , Chief Justice; VALIHURA , VAUGHN , SEITZ , and TRAYNOR , Justices, constituting the Court en Banc

. ORDER This 3 rd day of May, 2018, after careful consid eration of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, we find it evident th at the final judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated in its Memorandum Opinion and Order dated Febr uary 15, 2018. The Chancellor rose above the unjustified personal attacks on his integrity, and patiently and thoroughly addressed each issue raised in this bi tter dispute, including Elizabeth Elting’s objections to approval of the Sale Agreemen t. The Trustee also ably performed his duties under the same conditions . Under the standard of re view approved in the Sale2 Order, the Chancellor properly held that the Custodian did not abuse his discretion in connection with the sales process or the Terms of the Agreements.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of Chancery is AFFIRMED. 1

BY THE COURT: /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Justice

1 Justice Valihura concurs in the Chancellor’s a pproval of the Sale Agreement given that the Court’s February 13, 2017 affirmance of the Sale Or der is now the law of the case; but she notes that she continues to adhere to the views expressed in her dissent to that Opinion.
EXHIBIT 32

    CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned,  Michael A. Grollman, Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief
Executive  Officer and Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer of National  Scientific
Corporation (the "Company"),  has executed this certification in connection with
the  filing  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  of the  Company's
Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal  quarter ended December 31, 2004
(the "Report"). The undersigned hereby certifies that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certificate as of the 18th
day of March, 2005.


/s/ Michael A. Grollman
----------------------------------
Michael A. Grollman
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer,
and Acting Chief Financial Officer
### **CHAPTER 473—INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FACILITIES**

Sec.
47301.
Definitions.
47302.
Providing airport and airway property in foreign territories.
47303.
Training foreign citizens.
47304.
Transfer of airport and airway property.
47305.
Administrative.
[47306.
Repealed.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2024**—Pub. L. 118–63, title VII, §727, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1271, struck out item 47306 "Criminal penalty".
Exhibit 13.2

                      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  TOP  Tankers  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 20-F for the year ended  December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Stamatis N. Tsantanis,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

         A signed  original of this written  statement  has been provided to the
Company and will be retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Date: June 28, 2005

/s/ Stamatis N. Tsantanis
-------------------------
Chief Financial Officer







23116.0001 #582831
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSubsonic Dynamics of Stardust Sample Return CapsuleSubsonic dynamic stability tests performed in the NASA Langley 20-Foot Vertical Spin-Tunnel on a 0.238 scale model of the Stardust Sample Return Capsule are discussed. The tests reveal that the blunted 60 degree half-angle cone capsule is dynamically unstable at low subsonic conditions due to the aft location of the center-of-gravity (0.351 body diameters back from the nose). The divergent behavior of the capsule continued when the center-of-gravity was moved to 0.337 and 0.313 body diameters back from the nose. When the center-of-gravity was moved further forward to 0.290 body diameters back from the nose, the vehicle established itself in a limit cycle with amplitude around 10 degrees. Two afterbody modifications were examined which proved unsuccessful in alleviating the instability of the original design. Finally, the addition of different sized parachutes was examined as a means to stabilize the vehicle. The parachute tests indicate that a parachute with equivalent full scale drag area of at least 2.24 ft. is necessary to assure large perturbations are damped.Document ID19970017058Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsMitcheltree, Robert A.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Fremaux, Charles M.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1997Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:110329NASA-TM-110329Accession Number97N19418Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 242-80-01-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970017058.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §1726. General provisions

#### (a) Nondiscrimination

#### (1) In general

No individual in the United States may, on the basis of actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, age, or disability, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity that is funded in whole or in part with funds made available to carry out this subchapter.

#### (2) Enforcement

The Assistant Secretary shall effectuate paragraph (1) with respect to any program or activity described in that paragraph by issuing regulations and taking actions consistent with section 2000d–1 of title 42.

#### (3) Judicial review

Judicial review of an action taken by the Assistant Secretary under paragraph (2) shall be available to the extent provided in section 2000d–2 of title 42.

#### (b) Technological neutrality

The Assistant Secretary shall, to the extent practicable, carry out this subchapter in a technologically neutral manner.

#### (c) Audit and oversight

Beginning in the first fiscal year in which amounts are made available to carry out an activity authorized under this subchapter, and in each of the 4 fiscal years thereafter, there is authorized to be appropriated to the Office of Inspector General for the Department of Commerce $1,000,000 for audits and oversight of funds made available to carry out this subchapter, which shall remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 117–58, div. F, title III, §60307, Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1230.)
§ 203.64 How many applications may I file on a field or a development project? You may file one complete application for royalty relief during the life of the field or for a development project or an expansion project designed to produce a reservoir or set of reservoirs. However, you may send another application if: ( a ) You are eligible to apply for a redetermination under § 203.74;
( b ) You apply for royalty relief for an expansion project;
( c ) You withdraw the application before we make a determination; or
( d ) You apply for end-of-life royalty relief.
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.186 What reporting information and report forms must I submit? ( a ) You must submit information and reports as BSEE requires. ( 1 ) You may obtain copies of forms from, and submit completed forms to, the District Manager or Regional Supervisor.
( 2 ) Instead of paper copies of forms available from the District Manager or Regional Supervisor, you may use your own computer-generated forms that are equal in size to BSEE's forms. You must arrange the data on your form identical to the BSEE form. If you generate your own form and it omits terms and conditions contained on the official BSEE form, we will consider it to contain the omitted terms and conditions.
( 3 ) You may submit digital data when the Region/District is equipped to accept it.
( b ) When BSEE specifies, you must include, for public information, an additional copy of such reports. ( 1 ) You must mark it *Public Information*
( 2 ) You must include all required information, except information exempt from public disclosure under § 250.197 or otherwise exempt from public disclosure under law or regulation.
#### O’CONNELL, Respondent, v. SHERA, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 23, 1903.)

Action by Katherine O’Connell against Ethelinda M. Shera. W. J. McGoy, for appellant. G. J. G. Hall, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. See 73 N. Y. Supp. 231.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsECLSS Sustaining Compatibility Testing on Urine Processor Assembly Nonmetallic Materials for Reformulation of Pretreated Urine SolutionOn International Space Station (ISS), the Urine Processor Assembly (UPA) converts human urine and flush water into potable water. The urine is acid-pretreated primarily to control microbial growth. In recent years, the sulfuric acid (H2SO4) pretreatment was believed to be largely responsible for producing salt crystals capable of plugging filters in UPA components and significantly reducing the percentage of water recovery from urine. In 2012, ISS management decided to change the acid pretreatment for urine from sulfuric to phosphoric with the goal of eliminating or minimizing formation of salt crystals. In 2013-2014, as part of the qualification of the phosphoric acid (H3PO4) formulation, samples of 12 nonmetallic materials used in UPA components were immersed for up to one year in pretreated urine and brine solutions made with the new H3PO4 formulation. Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) was used to measure modulus (stiffness) of the immersed samples compared to virgin control samples. Such compatibility data obtained by DMA for the H3PO4-based solutions were compared to DMA data obtained for the H2SO4-based solutions in 2002-2003.Document ID20150021400Acquisition SourceMarshall Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsWingard, C. D.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredNovember 19, 2015Publication DateSeptember 1, 2015Subject CategoryNonmetallic MaterialsMan/System Technology And Life SupportReport/Patent NumberNASA/TP-2015-218212M15-4854M-1401Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20150021400.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §1424a. Repealed. Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, §56(e), 65 Stat. 729

Section, act Aug. 1, 1950, ch. 512, §23, 64 Stat. 390, related to appeals from the District Court of Guam to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and to the United States Supreme Court. See sections 41, 1252, 1291, 1292, and 1294 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Savings Provision

Act Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, §56(l), 65 Stat. 730, provided that the repeal by section 56 of act Oct. 31, 1951, shall not affect any rights or liabilities existing hereunder on the effective date of that repeal (Oct. 31, 1951).