alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC Form
10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         101,997
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  179,371<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F2>
<PP&E>                                       6,996,960
<DEPRECIATION>                               (501,522)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,956,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F2>
<BONDS>                                      5,329,707
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    339,128
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,936,321
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,956,808
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               300,257
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  169,312
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,722
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              91,910
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 45,124
<INCOME-TAX>                                    45,124
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             45,124
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,282
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22
<FN>
<F1>Receivables are stated net of allowances.
<F2>The Operating Partnership does not report using a classified balance sheet.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 92.552 Notice and opportunity for hearing; sanctions. ( a ) If HUD finds after reasonable notice and opportunity for hearing that a participating jurisdiction has failed to comply with any provision of this part and until HUD is satisfied that there is no longer any such failure to comply: ( 1 ) HUD shall reduce the funds in the participating jurisdiction's HOME Investment Trust Fund by the amount of any expenditures that were not in accordance with the requirements of this part; and
( 2 ) HUD may do one or more of the following: ( i ) Prevent withdrawals from the participating jurisdiction's HOME Investment Trust Fund for activities affected by the failure to comply;
( ii ) Restrict the participating jurisdiction's activities under this part to activities that conform to one or more model programs which HUD has developed in accordance with section 213 of the Act;
( iii ) Remove the participating jurisdiction from participation in allocations or reallocations of funds made available under subpart B or J of this part;
( iv ) Require the participating jurisdiction to make matching contributions in amounts required by § 92.218(a) as HOME funds are drawn from the participating jurisdiction's HOME Investment Trust Fund United States Treasury Account. Provided, however, that HUD may on due notice suspend payments at any time after the issuance of a notice of opportunity for hearing pursuant to paragraph (b)(1) of this section, pending such hearing and a final decision, to the extent HUD determines such action necessary to preclude the further expenditure of funds for activities affected by the failure to comply.
( b ) *Proceedings.* When HUD proposes to take action pursuant to this section, the respondent in the proceedings will be the participating jurisdiction or, at HUD's option, the State recipient. Proceedings will be conducted in accordance with 24 CFR part 26.
[61 FR 48750, Sept. 16, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 44840, Aug. 22, 1997; 78 FR 44683, July 24, 2013]
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 161 (Monday, August 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50205-50206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-20419]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority DA1-343]

Re-Delegation by the Under Secretary for Management to the 
Comptroller of Authorities Relating to Administration of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act

    By virtue of the authority vested in me by the Secretary of State, 
including by Delegation of Authority No. 198, dated September 16, 1992, 
and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), Public Law 92-463 (5 
U.S.C. Appendix), and to the extent authorized by law, I hereby re-
delegate to the Comptroller, the following functions and authorities:
    (1) Committee management, in accordance with Section 8 of FACA; and
    (2) The authority to make a written determination to close a 
meeting of an advisory committee to the public, pursuant to Section 
10(d) of FACA.
    The Comptroller may re-delegate the function of Committee 
Management Officer. Any act, executive order, regulation or procedure 
subject to, or affected by, this delegation shall be deemed to be such 
act, executive order, regulation or procedure as amended from time to 
time.
    Notwithstanding this delegation of authority, the Secretary, the 
Deputy Secretary, the Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources, 
and the Under Secretary for Management may at any time exercise any 
authority or function delegated by this delegation of authority.
    Delegations of Authority Nos. 157-1 and 157-2 are revoked, except 
to the extent that they revoke other delegations of authority. This 
document shall be published in the Federal Register.

[[Page 50206]]

    Dated: August 3, 2012.
Patrick F. Kennedy,
Under Secretary of State for Management.
[FR Doc. 2012-20419 Filed 8-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-35-P
```
### §1951. Entry into force of Compact

Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 101(d)(1)(B) of Public Law 99–658 [48 U.S.C. 1931(d)(1)(B)], entry into force of the Compact of Free Association between the United States and Palau (set forth in title II of Public Law 99–658 and hereafter in this joint resolution referred to as the "Compact") in accordance with subsections (a) and (d) of section 101 of Public Law 99–658 (100 Stat. 3673) [48 U.S.C. 1931(a), (d)] is hereby authorized—

(1) subject to the condition that the Compact, as approved by the Congress in Public Law 99–658, is approved by the requisite percentage of the votes cast in a referendum conducted pursuant to the Constitution of Palau, and such approval is free from any legal challenge, and

(2) upon expiration of 30 days, in which either the House of Representatives or the Senate of the United States is in session, after the President notifies the Committees on Interior and Insular Affairs and Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate of the effective date of the Compact.

(Pub. L. 101–219, title I, §101, Dec. 12, 1989, 103 Stat. 1870.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Public Law 99–658, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 99–658, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3672, which is classified generally to part A of this subchapter. Title II of Pub. L. 99–658 enacted section 1934 of this title and provisions set out as a note under section 1931 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

The Compact of Free Association between the United States and Palau, referred to in text, is contained in section 201 of Pub. L. 99–658, set out as a note under section 1931 of this title.

This joint resolution, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 101–219, Dec. 12, 1989, 103 Stat. 1870, which enacted this part and sections 1846 and 1972 of this title, amended sections 1615 and 1933 of this title and section 10251 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement, and enacted provisions set out as a note under section 1905 of Title 44, Public Printing and Documents. For complete classification of this joint resolution to the Code, see Tables.

For Oct. 1, 1994, as the effective date of the Compact, referred to in par. (2), see Proc. No. 6726, Sept. 27, 1994, 59 F.R. 49777, set out as a note under section 1931 of this title.

#### Codification

Section was formerly set out as a note under section 1681 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Natural Resources of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Third Congress, Jan. 5, 1993.
§ 285.1018 Who is responsible for decommissioning an OCS facility subject to an Alternate Use RUE? ( a ) The holder of an Alternate Use RUE is responsible for all decommissioning obligations that accrue following the issuance of the Alternate Use RUE and which pertain to the Alternate Use RUE.
( b ) The lessee under the lease originally issued under 30 CFR chapter V will remain responsible for decommissioning obligations that accrued before issuance of the Alternate Use RUE, as well as for decommissioning obligations that accrue following issuance of the Alternate Use RUE to the extent associated with continued activities authorized under other parts of this title.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Terra Nova Acquisition Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-KSB
for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                 |  |  |  |     |  |                                     
|---------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------
|February 9, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Vahan Kololian                  
|                 |  |  |  |     |  | Vahan Kololian                      
|                 |  |  |  |     |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|                 |  |  | 
|February 9, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Lee W. Chung                    
|                 |  |  |  |     |  | Lee W. Chung                        
|                 |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive
        - U.S. Commission of Fine Arts

#  U.S. Commission of Fine Arts 

**Collected by:** Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive 

**Archived since:**Oct, 2014

**Description:**
The U.S. Commission of Fine Arts (CFA) is an independent agency of the federal government of the United States, and was established in 1910. The CFA has review (but not approval) authority over the design and aesthetics of all construction within Washington, D.C.  The CFA Web site provides detailed information on the Shipstead-Luce Act, the Old Georgetown Act, and submission requirements for concept review.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal,     	    Arts & Humanities

**Language:**    	    English

**Collector:**    	    U.S. Government Publishing Office

## Narrow Your Results

### 

            There are no further ways to narrow your results.           

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear

              - Sites
              - Search Page Text

Page 1 of 1  (2 Total Results)

**Sort By:**
                - Title (A-Z)
                - Title (Z-A)
                - URL (A-Z)
                - URL (Z-A)

### URL:     https://twitter.com/CFA_GOV/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.cfa.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

Page 1 of 1  (2 Total Results)

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1380 CA 15-00503**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

CHRISTOPHER WRIGHT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

JOSEPH MARRA AND SUSAN MARRA, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

LEWIS & LEWIS, P.C., BUFFALO (EMILY F. JANICZ OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
WALSH, ROBERTS & GRACE, BUFFALO (KEITH N. BOND OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County (Paula L. Feroleto, J.), entered December 8, 2014. The order, among other things, granted defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in its entirety.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: December 23, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
130 STAT. 1360 PUBLIC LAW 114–259—DEC. 14, 2016 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5509: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

Sept. 26, considered and passed House. 

Nov. 30, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–259 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs temporary lodging facility in Indianapolis, Indiana, as the ‘‘Dr. Otis Bowen Veteran House’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS TEMPORARY LODGING FACILITY, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA. 

The Department of Veterans Affairs temporary lodging facility 

in Indianapolis, Indiana, shall after the date of the enactment 

of this Act be known and designated as the ‘‘Dr. Otis Bowen 

Veteran House’’. Any reference to such temporary lodging facility 

in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper 

of the United States shall be considered to be a reference to the 

Dr. Otis Bowen Veteran House. 

Approved December 14, 2016. 

Dec. 14, 2016 

[H.R. 5509] 


kgrant on DSKB33CYQ1 with PUBLAW
### §16106. Punishment of corporation for violations committed by certain individuals

An act or omission that would be a violation of this subtitle if committed by a director, officer, receiver, trustee, lessee, agent, or employee of a pipeline carrier providing transportation or service subject to this part that is a corporation is also a violation of this part by that corporation. The penalties of this chapter apply to that violation. When acting in the scope of their employment, the actions and omissions of individuals acting for or employed by that carrier are considered to be the actions and omissions of that carrier as well as that individual.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §106(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 931.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 11915 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3439 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

201 North 3rd Street in Smithfield, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Ava Gardner 

Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 26, 2005 

Mr. ETHERIDGE (for himself, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, Mr. MCINTYRE, 

Mr. MILLER of North Carolina, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Mr. WATT, Mr. 

JONES of North Carolina, Mr. HAYES, Ms. FOXX, Mr. COBLE, Mr. 

MCHENRY, Mrs. MYRICK, and Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 201 North 3rd Street in Smithfield, North 

Carolina, as the ‘‘Ava Gardner Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AVA GARDNER POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 201 North 3rd Street in Smith6 field, North Carolina, shall be known and designated as 

7 the ‘‘Ava Gardner Post Office’’. 
2 

•HR 3439 IH 

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Ava Gardner Post 

5 Office’’. 

Æ
<page>  EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley
Cornerstone Fund IV L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter
Davis, President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.









By:   /s/ Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:	President of Demeter Management Corporation,
			the general partner of the Partnership

Date:		November 14, 2008
Second Department,

January, 1961

(January 3, 1961)

#### In the Matter of the Application of Israel Slochowsky, a Suspended Attorney, for Reinstatement as an Attorney.

Motion by suspended attorney, whose period of suspension has expired, for reinstatement to the Bar, referred: (a) to the Committee on Character and Fitness of the Second Judicial District for investigation and report as to the applicant’s character and fitness and as to his activities and conduct since his suspension, and for the committee’s recommendation; and (b) to the District Attorney of Kings County, the petitioner in the prior disciplinary proceeding, for a statement with his comments and recommendation. The motion will be held in abeyance pending the filing of said report and statement. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
### §51904. Presentation to representatives

If an individual to be issued an award under this chapter is unable to accept the award personally, the Secretary of Transportation may present the award to an appropriate representative.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(b), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1585.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 51904 | 46 App.:2004(b). | Pub. L. 100–324, §5(b), May 30, 1988, 102 Stat. 577. |

Section
From: Richard Parker [mailto:richardparkerdc@gmail.com] 

Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 12:12 PM 

To: Alex Hofmann; Andrew Delaski; Aris Marantan; Art Rosenfeld; Bob Saint; Bob Smith; Brian Coffey; 

Caitlin Johnson; Carlos Gaytan; Caskey, John; charlie drexler; Charlie Stevens; Chris Bolduc; Chris Brown; 

Clark Silcox; Creevy, Jim; Dan Cohen; Daniel Young; Eric Peterson; Freeman, Jeremiah; Gary Fernstrom; 

Greg Coulter; Greg Rosenquist; Hirsch, Bruce R; James Lass; Jennifer Tiedeman; Jerry Corkran; Jerry 

Hodge; Jerry Schoen; Jim Raba; Joanna Mauer; John Cymbalsky; John Rossetti; Katie Coughlin; Ken 

Winder; Mahesh P. Sampat; Matthew Nardotti; Maxine Savitz; Meg Waltner; Meyers, Aaron; Michael 

Hyland; Michael Rivest; Millure, Dave; Phil Harter; Phil Hopkinson; Polinski, Raymond; Puesh Kumar; 

Richard W. Parker; Rick Anderson; Rob Greeson; Robert Berman; Robert van Buskirk; Robin Roy; Ryan, 

Paul; Scott Beck; Simmons, Chuck; Steve Nadel; Steve Rosenstock; Thomas Petrosino; Tim Ballo; Tom 

Eckman; Wes Patterson; Zhimei Luo 

Subject: EL between 0 and 1 for liquid immersed 

Colleagues, 

I understand that LBNL is currently running an LCC/NIA for a EL between 0 and 1 for all liquid 

immersed design lines and will post it once it is ready. Depending on their perspective, 

members may or may not find such an EL an interesting point of reference for negotiation or an 

acceptable outcome, but the analysis was requested by multiple members, and promised, and will 

be delivered as soon as it is ready. 

All best, 

Richard Parker 

Facilitator