alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1753. Qualifications for office of Delegate

To be eligible for the office of Delegate a candidate shall—

(1) be at least 25 years of age on the date of the election;

(2) have been a citizen of the United States for at least 7 years prior to the date of the election;

(3) be a resident and domiciliary of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands for at least 7 years prior to the date of the election;

(4) be qualified to vote in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands on the date of the election; and

(5) not be, on the date of the election, a candidate for any other office.

(Pub. L. 110–229, title VII, §713, May 8, 2008, 122 Stat. 868.)
### §1402. Extension of industrial alcohol and internal revenue laws to Virgin Islands

Title III of the National Prohibition Act, as amended, and all provisions of the internal revenue laws relating to the enforcement thereof, are extended to and made applicable to the Virgin Islands, from and after August 27, 1935. The Insular Government shall advance to the Treasury of the United States such funds as may be required from time to time by the Secretary of the Treasury for the purpose of defraying all expenses incurred by the Treasury Department in connection with the enforcement in the Virgin Islands of the said Title III and regulations promulgated thereunder. The funds so advanced shall be deposited in a separate trust fund in the Treasury of the United States and shall be available to the Treasury Department for the purposes of this section.

(June 26, 1936, ch. 830, title III, §329(c), 49 Stat. 1957.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The National Prohibition Act, as amended, referred to in text, is act Oct. 28, 1919, ch. 85, 41 Stat. 305. Title III of such Act was classified principally to chapter 3 (§71 et seq.) of Title 27, Intoxicating Liquors, and was omitted from the Code in view of the incorporation of such provisions in the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, and subsequently into the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

#### Codification

Provisions similar to those comprising this section relating to Puerto Rico are classified to section 734a of this title.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3460

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow married individuals 

who are legally separated and living apart to exclude from gross income 

the income from United States savings bonds used to pay higher education tuition and fees. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 27, 2005

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow married individuals who are legally separated and living 

apart to exclude from gross income the income from 

United States savings bonds used to pay higher education tuition and fees.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3460 IH 

1 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MARRIED INDIVIDUALS FILING SEPA2 RATE RETURNS ALLOWED TO EXCLUDE IN3 COME FROM UNITED STATES SAVINGS BONDS 

4 USED TO PAY HIGHER EDUCATION TUITION 

5 AND FEES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (d) of section 135 of 

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special 

8 rules for exclusion of income from United States savings 

9 bonds used to pay higher education tuition and fees) is 

10 amended by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (5) 

11 and by inserting after paragraph (3) the following new 

12 paragraph: 

13 ‘‘(4) CERTAIN MARRIED INDIVIDUALS LIVING

14 APART.—For purposes of this section, an individual 

15 shall not be considered as married in a taxable year 

16 if such individual—

17 ‘‘(A) is married and files a separate return 

18 for such taxable year, 

19 ‘‘(B) as of the close of such taxable year, 

20 is legally separated from the individual’s 

21 spouse, and 

22 ‘‘(C) was not a member of the same house23 hold as the individual’s spouse at any time dur24 ing the taxable year.’’. 
3

•HR 3460 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2004.

Æ
II 

Calendar No. 344 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3548 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2005 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

DECEMBER 16, 2005 

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located on Franklin Avenue in Pearl River, New York, 

as the ‘‘Heinz Ahlmeyer, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated on Franklin Avenue in Pearl River, New York, shall 

6 be known and designated as the ‘‘Heinz Ahlmeyer, Jr. 

7 Post Office Building’’. 
2 

•HR 3548 RS 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to the ‘‘Heinz Ahlmeyer, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

Calendar No. 344 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3548 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. River, New York, as the ‘‘Heinz Ahlmeyer, Jr. al Service located on Franklin Avenue in Pearl 

DECEMBER 16, 2005 

Reported without amendment
#### In re SEWARD. In the matter of proving the last will and testament of John W. Seward, deceased.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

November 11, 1903.)

No opinion. Decree of the surrogate unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Shortcut
      toQuickLinks                    **EXHIBIT
      32.1**




The
      following certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SEC Release
      No. 33-8238. These certifications shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes
      of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall
      they be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the
      Securities Act of 1933, as amended, whether made before or after the date
      hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.






**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Schiff Nutrition
      International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby
      certifies, to his knowledge, that:




(i)  the
      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period
      ended November 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
      of
      Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(ii)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated:
                January 17, 2006
            /s/  BRUCE
                J. WOODBruce
                J. WoodChief
                Executive Officer




A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to Schiff Nutrition International, Inc. and will be retained by
      Schiff Nutrition International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








**Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Schiff Nutrition
      International, Inc. a Delaware, corporation (the "Company"), hereby
      certifies, to his knowledge, that:




(i)  the
      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period
      ended November 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
      of
      Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(ii)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated:
                January 17, 2006
            /s/  JOSEPH
                W. BATYJoseph
                W. BatyChief
                Financial Officer







A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to Schiff Nutrition International, Inc. and will be retained by
      Schiff Nutrition International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




1
### **CHAPTER 242—PROJECT DELIVERY**

Sec.
24201.
Efficient environmental reviews.
24202.
Railroad rights-of-way.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2015**—Pub. L. 114–94, div. A, title XI, §§11503(a), 11504(b), Dec. 4, 2015, 129 Stat. 1691, 1693, added chapter 242 and items 24201 and 24202.
### §42303. Information requests

(a) In General.—To further the purposes of section 42302(a) of this title, the Federal Maritime Commission may order any person (including a common carrier, shipper, shippers' association, ocean transportation intermediary, or marine terminal operator, or an officer, receiver, trustee, lessee, agent or employee thereof) to file with the Commission any periodic or special report, answers to questions, documentary material, or other information the Commission considers necessary or appropriate. The Commission may require the response to any such order to be made under oath. The response shall be provided in the form and within the time specified by the Commission.

(b) Subpoenas.—In an investigation under section 42302 of this title, the Commission may subpoena witnesses and evidence.

(c) Nondisclosure.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Commission may determine that any information submitted to it in response to a request under this section, or otherwise, shall not be disclosed to the public.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §7, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1552.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 42303 | 46 App.:1710a(d) | Pub. L. 100–418, title X, §10002(d), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1571; Pub. L. 105–258, title I, §111(4), Oct. 14, 1998, 112 Stat. 1911. |

Section

In subsection (b), the words "subpoena witnesses and evidence" are substituted for "issue subpoenas to compel the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of records or other evidence" for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words.

In subsection (c), the words "in its discretion" are omitted as unnecessary.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 22, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-40206

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARCO AMBROSIO MEZA-LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-02-CR-1233-ALL

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Marco Ambrosio Meza-Lopez (Meza) appeals his guilty-plea

conviction and sentence for illegal reentry following deportation

in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Meza argues that the “felony”

and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and

(2) are unconstitutional. Meza acknowledges that his argument is

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224,

235 (1998), but he asserts that the decision has been cast into

doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 489-90 (2000). He
No. 03-40206

-2-

seeks to preserve his argument for possible further review and

“to avoid later accusations of procedural default should the law

change on this question.” 

Meza’s Apprendi argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres,

523 U.S. at 235. We must follow the precedent set in

Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself

determines to overrule it.” United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d

979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000) (internal quotation and citation

omitted). 

AFFIRMED.
§ 1227.106 What statutory requirements must a State meet to receive a delegation? The ONRR Director will decide whether to approve your delegation request and will ask the Secretary of the Interior to concur in the decision. That decision is solely within the ONRR Director's and the Secretary's discretion. The ONRR Director's decision, which the Secretary concurs in, is the final decision for the Department of the Interior. The ONRR Director may approve a State's request for delegation only if, based upon the State's delegation proposal and the hearing record, the ONRR Director finds that: ( a ) It is likely that the State will provide adequate resources to achieve the purposes of the Act;
( b ) The State has demonstrated that it will effectively and faithfully administer the ONRR regulations under the Act in accordance with subsections (c) and (d) of section 205 of the Act;
( c ) Such delegation will not create an unreasonable burden on any lessee;
( d ) The State agrees to adopt standardized reporting procedures ONRR prescribes for royalty and production accounting purposes, unless the State and all affected parties (including ONRR) otherwise agree;
( e ) The State agrees to follow and adhere to regulations and guidelines ONRR issues under the mineral leasing laws regarding valuation of production; and
( f ) Where necessary for a State to carry out and enforce a delegated activity, the State agrees to enact such laws and promulgate such regulations as are consistent with relevant Federal laws and regulations.
[62 FR 43084, Aug. 12, 1997, as amended at 75 FR 61087, Oct. 4, 2010]
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive
        - Federal Register

#  Federal Register 

**Collected by:** Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive 

**Archived since:**Apr, 2016

**Description:**
The Office of the Federal Register (OFR) of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), and the U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO) jointly administer the FederalRegister.gov website. The OFR/GPO partnership developed this unofficial, HTML (XML-based) edition of the daily Federal Register (“Federal Register 2.0” or “FR2”). We built the HTML edition of the Federal Register to make it easier for citizens and communities to understand the regulatory process and to participate in Government decision-making.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal,     	    American History & Political Science

**Creator:**    	    The Government Publishing Office,     	    National Archives and Records Administration

**Language:**    	    English

**Collector:**    	    U.S. Government Publishing Office

## Narrow Your Results

### 

            There are no further ways to narrow your results.           

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear

              - Sites
              - Search Page Text

Page 1 of 1  (4 Total Results)

**Sort By:**
                - Title (A-Z)
                - Title (Z-A)
                - URL (A-Z)
                - URL (Z-A)

### URL:     https://twitter.com/FedRegister/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.facebook.com/FederalRegister/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.federalregister.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.youtube.com/user/FederalRegister/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

Page 1 of 1  (4 Total Results)

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
May 16, 1978

78-26 MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE

DIRECTOR, GENERAL GOVERNMENT

DIVISION, PRESIDENT’S REORGANIZATION

PROJECT

Reorganization Act—Reorganization Plan

Dealing With More Than One Logically

Consistent Subject Matter (5 U.S.C. § 905(a)(7))

This responds to your request for our opinion concerning the interpretation to 

be given the phrase “ dealing with more than one logically consistent subject 

matter” found in § 905(a)(7) of title 5. This limitation on the content of 

reorganization plans was first introduced in 1971, see 85 Stat. 576, in order to 

prevent the submission of plans which contain “ a variety of miscellaneous 

actions, completely unrelated to one other. . . .” S. Rept. No. 485, 92d Cong., 

1st sess. at 5 (1971); H. Rept. No. 146, 92d Cong., 1st sess. at 3 (1971). The 

legislative history of the 1977 version of the Reorganization Act sheds 

additional light on the question:

Logically consistent subject matter could include: a broad purpose of 

government such as Economic Development or Natural Resources; a 

series of similar programs in different agencies, such as Income 

Maintenance; all functions of a single agency; or crosscutting but 

identical functions, such as Administration, Budget, legal counsel, et 

cetera. [H. Rept. No. 105, 95th Cong., 1st sess. at 20 (1977)].

While this broad language may itself be indefinite, it provides at least some 

guidance concerning the phrase’s intended meaning.

L e o n U l m a n

Deputy Assistant Attorney General

Office o f Legal Counsel

106
#### § 270.2 Application of this part.

This part applies to any contract or subcontract entered into by a lessee or by a contractor or subcontractor of a lessee after the effective date of these regulations to provide goods, services, facilities, or property in an amount of $10,000 or more in connection with any activity related to the exploration for or development and production of oil, gas, or other minerals or materials in the OCS under the Act.
* After examining appellant’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. SeeFed. R. App. P. 34(f) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### DEC 19 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHARLES MARQUETTE JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 97-5136 (D.C. No. 97-CV-536-C) (N.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before BRORBY , EBEL and KELLY , Circuit Judges.
On May 27, 1996, defendant-appellant Charles Marque tte Jackson ("Jackson") pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine. The district court sentenced J ackson to 120 months imprisonment on October 23, 1996. Jackson did not file a direct appeal challenging his conviction and sentence.- 2 -

Jackson filed a pro se motion under 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 on June 4, 1997, to vacate, set aside, or correct the sentence imposed upon him based on ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing. Jackson argue s that his counsel should have sought a downward departure for minor participation pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 despite Jackson's role as a major courier f or drugs and money in the cocaine distribution conspiracy. Jackson also cont ends that his counsel should have sought a downward departure under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) and U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2 despite Jackson's criminal history category of III. Finally, Jackson complains that his counsel should have sought a red uction in his sentence due to sentencing disparity between Jackson and his codefe ndants despite Jackson's inability to show that any disparity actually exist s. Because Jackson filed his § 2255 motion on June 4, 1997, which was after the effective date of the Antiterrorism and Effecti ve Death Penalty Act ("AEDPA"), 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2254-66 (1996), the AEDPA provision requiring a certificate of appealability applies to Jackson's a ppeal. The district court denied a certificate of appealability in a July 10, 1997 ord er. Jackson now appeals the denial of the certificate of appealability. Findin g no substantial showing of the denial of an important federal right or any other r eason justifying further proceedings, we hereby deny a certificate of appeal ability.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.- 3 - ENTERED FOR THE COURT David M. Ebel Circuit Judge
§ 891.630 Denial of admission, termination of tenancy, and modification of lease. ( a ) The provisions of part 5, subpart I, of this title apply to Section 202 direct loan projects.
( b ) The provisions of part 247 of this title apply to all decisions by a Borrower to terminate the tenancy or modify the lease of a family residing in a unit.
( c ) In actions or potential actions to terminate tenancy, the owner shall follow 24 CFR part 5, subpart L (Protection for Victims of Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, or Stalking).
[66 FR 28798, May 24, 2001, as amended at 73 FR 72343, Nov. 28, 2008; 75 FR 66262, Oct. 27, 2010; 81 FR 80815, Nov. 16, 2016]
### §70032. Saint Lawrence Seaway

The authority granted to the Secretary under sections 70001, 70002, 70003, 70004, and 70011 may not be delegated with respect to the Saint Lawrence Seaway to any agency other than the Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation. Any other authority granted the Secretary under subchapters I through III and this subchapter shall be delegated by the Secretary to the Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation to the extent the Secretary determines such delegation is necessary for the proper operation of the Saint Lawrence Seaway.

(Added Pub. L. 115–282, title IV, §401(a), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4261; amended Pub. L. 116–260, div. AA, title V, §512(c)(6)(F), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2757; Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8507(a)(5), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4753.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "I through III" for "A through C".

2020—Pub. L. 116–260 substituted "Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation" for "Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation" in two places.
#### § 18.3 Consultation.

By appointment, applicants or their representatives may visit the U.S. Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration, Approval and Certification Center, 765 Technology Drive, Triadelphia, WV 26059, to discuss a proposed design to be submitted for approval, certification, or acceptance for listing. No charge is made for such consultation and no written report thereof will be made to the applicant.

[33 FR 4660, Mar. 19, 1968, as amended at 43 FR 12314, Mar. 24, 1978; 73 FR 52211, Sept. 9, 2008]