alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0309

SAT Date: 3/5/2013

Print Date: 8/22/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 2

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

2 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: Yes

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: LUNG, IRR, AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0309

FATE: MW = 

Liquid with MP < 0 C (M)

S = Disp.

VP < 

BP > 

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption and possible partial biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = strong
PBT Potential: P2B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is poor through the skin, moderate through 

the GI tract, and good through the lungs based on analogs. There is concern lung effects if 

inhaled and irritation based on the surfactant properties of the PMN material. The PMN material 

is a nonionic surfactant which means that the eye may be anesthetized and significant irritation 

may occur before the effect are noticed. Low moderate concern. 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 9.2

daphnid 48-h LC50 8.4

green algal 96-h EC50 10

fish _ chronic value 1.8

daphnid _ chronic 

value

1.7

algal _ chronic 

value

5.4

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for nonionic surfactants; SAR 

chemical class = MW 720 with 73% < 

1000 and 12% < 500; liquid with unknown mp (P); S = dispersible in water at 20 C (P); pH7; 

effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; 

hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3 and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

170

SARs nonionic surfactants

SAR Class

Ecotox Category Nonionic Surfactants

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Becky Jones
Impurity and CAS Registry Number

(a)

Maximum

percent

(b)

Confidential

CBI CBI

CBI

CBI CBI

CBI

CBI CBI

CBI CBI

CBI CBI

CBI CBI

CBI CBI

CBI CBI

TS-E077KJ

( CBI )

Attachment 3

 Page 1/1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          23,460                  12,318
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,430                   7,836
<ALLOWANCES>                                       117                     169
<INVENTORY>                                      6,936                   4,965
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,234                  27,432
<PP&E>                                          75,526                  60,280
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,785                  31,701
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 229,073                 186,111
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,933                   9,871
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           30,000                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           128                     128
<OTHER-SE>                                     182,373                 169,845
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   229,073                 186,111
<SALES>                                         27,008                  24,364
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,370                  24,746
<CGS>                                           17,138                  13,655
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,619                  16,549
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   404                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  48                      81
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,299                   8,116
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,493                   3,251
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,806                   4,865
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,806                   4,865
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25                    0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25                    0.38
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1


                        CHINA FINANCE ONLINE CO. LIMITED

                                  Certification


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned, Jun Ning, Chief Executive
Officer of China Finance Online Co. Limited (the "Company"), hereby certifies,
to his knowledge, that the Company's annual report on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: April 28, 2005                            /s/ Jun Ning
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Name: Jun Ning
                                                Title: Chief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
### §1408e. Additional powers

Powers granted in this Act shall be in addition to and not in derogation of any powers granted by other law to or for the benefit or assistance of any public corporate authority or municipality.

(July 18, 1950, ch. 466, title III, §306, 64 Stat. 347.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, means act July 18, 1950, ch. 466, 64 Stat. 344, known as the Territorial Enabling Act of 1950, which enacted this subchapter and sections 480 to 480b, 483a, 483b, 721 to 721b, and 910 to 910b of this title, amended sections 481 to 483 and 722 of this title, and enacted provisions set out as notes under sections 480, 481, and 722 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
 
 
 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Radale Imports, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the Report), I, Lee D. Dodson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:
 
 (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and
 
 (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  ****Date: August 16, 2004
By:
/s/ *Lee D. Dodson*Lee D. DodsonTitle Chief Financial Officer
 
 The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 10.2.d
 AMENDMENT NO. 3
TO THE
2005 CEDAR SHOPPING CENTERS, INC.
DEFERRED
COMPENSATION PLAN
     1.
    
    Section 3.4(a) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following sentence at the end
thereof:
  2.
    
    Section 4.1(c)(i) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following sentence at the end
thereof:
  3.
    
    This Amendment shall be effective as if originally set forth in the Plan, as of December 19,
2005.4.
    
    Except to the extent hereinabove set forth, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
 1




---



##### 



CEDAR SHOPPING CENTERS, INC.By:
    /s/ LEO S. ULLMANName: /s/ Leo S. UllmanTitle: President 2
### **CHAPTER 75—GENERAL PROCEDURES FOR LICENSING, CERTIFICATION, AND DOCUMENTATION**

Sec.
7501.
Duplicates.
7502.
Records.
7503.
Dangerous drugs as grounds for denial.
7504.
Travel and expense reimbursement.
7505.
Review of information in National Driver Register.
7506.
Convention tonnage for licenses, certificates, and documents.
7507.
Authority to extend the duration of licenses, certificates of registry, and merchant mariner documents.
7508.
Authority to extend the duration of medical certificates.
7509.
Medical certification by trusted agents.
7510.
Examinations for merchant mariner credentials.
7511.
Convicted sex offender as grounds for denial.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2022**—Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXVI, §11602(b), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 4147, added item 7511.

**2016**—Pub. L. 114–120, title III, §§309(c), 315(a)(2), Feb. 8, 2016, 130 Stat. 57, 62, added items 7509 and 7510.

**2012**—Pub. L. 112–213, title III, §306(b), Dec. 20, 2012, 126 Stat. 1565, added item 7508.

**2010**—Pub. L. 111–281, title VI, §615(b), Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 2972, added item 7507.

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–324, title VII, §745(b), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3943, added item 7506.

**1990**—Pub. L. 101–380, title IV, §4105(c), Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 513, added item 7505.

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–640, §10(b)(2)(B), Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3550, added item 7504.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael S. Schneider, Appellant.

[832 NYS2d 834]

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s motion to be relieved of assignment granted *(see People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38 [1979]). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Craig J. Doran, J.—Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Gorski, Smith, Fahey and Green, JJ.
No. 99-20599 

1–

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-20599

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EDDIE GOMEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-98-CR-126-7

--------------------

April 13, 2000

Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Eddie Gomez argues that the district court clearly erred in

including the 1996 cocaine transactions as relevant conduct to

the offense of conviction. The inclusion of the 1996

transactions increased the quantity of drugs for which Gomez was

held responsible. Gomez argues that the 1996 cocaine

transactions were not part of the conspiracy for which he was 

convicted and were not part of the same common scheme or plan as

the conspiracy. 
No. 99-20599 

2–

The district court’s determination on the quantity of drugs

for sentencing purposes is a factual finding that this court

reviews for clear error. United States v. Torres, 114 F.3d 520,

527 (5th Cir. 1997). To determine whether prior conduct

qualifies as relevant conduct under § 1B1.3(a)(2), we consider

the similarity, regularity, and temporal proximity of the

conduct. United States v. Bethley, 973 F.2d 396, 401 (5th Cir.

1992) (relevant conduct apply to drug distributions occurring

continuously during the six months before the charged conduct). 

There is no dispute as to the facts of this case. The

cocaine trafficking engaged in during 1996 was outside of the

time period which the indictment specified for the conspiracy. 

The 1996 transactions took place less than one year before the

dates of the conspiracy. The 1996 transactions involved the same

people involved in the charged conspiracy. Gomez argues that the

1996 transactions were not part of the conspiracy because the

drugs moved in 1996 did not come from the same source or go to

the same destination as the drugs in the charged conspiracy. 

This argument would be persuasive if the charged conspiracy

involved regular shipments of drugs from a single source to a

single destination; however, the charged conspiracy was not a

structured operation. Rather, it consisted of stealing, buying,

and selling marijuana and cocaine in an opportunistic manner. 

The district court was not clearly wrong in finding that the 1996

transactions were part of the relevant conduct of the conspiracy. 

AFFIRMED.
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
|   |   |   |
| Date:  | October 21, 2015 | By:   | /s/ Kimberly A. Ross  |
|   |   |   | Kimberly A. Ross |
|   |   |   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  |
|   |   |
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SATBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


I, Moshael Straus, as Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Odd Job Stores,
Inc. (the "Company"), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

           (1) The accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending September
           30, 2003 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
           (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
           or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.




Date: November 14, 2003             By: /s/  Moshael Straus
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Moshael Straus
                                        Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer
#### LIPPS et al. v. MARKOWITZ et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

June 22, 1903.)

1. Appeal—Stipulation Precluding Appeal.

Where a stipulation waives all objections to the evidence, and authorizes the justice to render any judgment he sees fit, on the evidence, an appeal will not lie.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fifth District.

Action by Philip Eipps and another against Bernard Markowitz and another. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and GILDERSLEEVE and MacLEAN, JJ.

Abraham Brekstone, for appellants.

Louis B. Boudin, for respondents.

MacLEAN, J.

The plaintiffs are manufacturers of clothing, and the defendants are contract tailors. This action was for the recovery *173of certain vests, delivered—the plaintiffs claim—to the defendants, to he made, and which they failed to return: The defendants denied retaining the vests without cause, claiming a lien upon them for services, and for the latter set up a counterclaim. Testimony was given at the trial as to how many vests were delivered, and how many were returned, and as to whether a demand had been made. After the case was submitted, however, a stipulation was altered into between the parties, waiving any and all objections to the evidence, and giving the justice “power to decide the entitled cause on the whole evidence, and render any judgment that he saw fit,” or, in effect, making the learned justice an arbiter of the whole controversy between the parties. In view of that stipulation, the appeal seems scarcely explicable.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to the defendants. All concur.
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.1742 What other methods can I use to verify that a site is clear?

If you do not trawl a site, you can verify that the site is clear of obstructions by using any of the methods shown in the following table:

| If you use . . . | You must . . . | And you must . . . |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (a) Sonar, | cover 100 percent of the appropriate grid area listed in § 250.1741(a), | Use a sonar signal with a frequency of at least 500 kHz. |
| (b) A diver, | ensure that the diver visually inspects 100 percent of the appropriate grid area listed in § 250.1741(a), | Ensure that the diver uses a search pattern of concentric circles or parallel lines spaced no more than 10 feet apart. |
| (c) An ROV (remotely operated vehicle), | ensure that the ROV camera records videotape over 100 percent of the appropriate grid area listed in § 250.1741(a), | Ensure that the ROV uses a pattern of concentric circles or parallel lines spaced no more than 10 feet apart. |
; | ~~ DRAWING N =A WING NUMBER
DRAWING NUMBER | | DRAWING NUMBER | 7 | DRAWING NUMBER

[  GRAWING NUMBER |

LMeITAR 13100, 00 | \ \ |
8 % ® : 7
oN > ~ 8 =
3 1 -O). rr)
i @ ”
O 3%
© +E
aS
£&e
298%
ore:
: wigs
©)  ) c
a iN ul Lu > 3 N
“ g wD sme
: > IYec s
| 23282
( :
CG eRe ) |
- 22 oe: .
; vy a
3 A iN roe
WARE
= 7
x 3
oO ;
x N
7 >
é ra)
lan) =
: a
; 3
v 1
2 vo
w \ (op)
° | a
3
\.
8
8 -
2 oo f ) ‘ 8
| 3 = 2 : 8
2 S N 0 oO.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Reportof Cloud Medical Doctor Software Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2011 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael De La Garza, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:
| Name                         |         | State of Incorporation |
|------------------------------|--------------|------------------------|
| Stratosphere LLC             |         | Delaware               |
| Stratosphere Gaming LLC      |         | Nevada                 |
| Arizona Charlie’s, LLC |         | Nevada                 |
| Fresca, LLC                  |         | Nevada                 |
| Charlie’s Holding LLC  |         | Delaware               |
| Stratosphere Land LLC        |         | Nevada                 |
| Stratosphere Leasing, LLC    |         | Delaware               |
| Aquarius Gaming LLC          |    | Delaware               |

----
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of IMPSAT Fiber Networks on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ricardo A. Verdaguer, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the
registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date: May 23, 2005



| |  |                                      
| |  | -------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Ricardo A. Verdaguer             
| |  | Ricardo A. Verdaguer                 
| |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tumbleweed
Communications Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Jeffrey C. Smith, as Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 14, 2003



|/s/    JEFFREY C. SMITH             
|------------------------------------
|Jeffrey C. Smith                    
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



This certification
accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.