alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-28-2000
<CASH>                                           3,319
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,769
<ALLOWANCES>                                       388
<INVENTORY>                                     94,543
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               122,911
<PP&E>                                          30,587
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 182,885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,639
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,320
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,248
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   182,885
<SALES>                                         74,222
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           47,694
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,030
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   550
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,232
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,284)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,713)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,571)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,571)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.28)


</TABLE>
```

[114th Congress Public Law 312]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 130 STAT. 1533]]

Public Law 114-312
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  501 North Main Street in Florence, Arizona, as the ``Adolfo `Harpo' 
      Celaya Post Office''. <<NOTE: Dec. 16, 2016 -  [H.R. 6304]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ADOLFO ``HARPO'' CELAYA POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 501 North Main Street in Florence, Arizona, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Adolfo `Harpo' Celaya Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Adolfo 
`Harpo' Celaya Post Office''.

    Approved December 16, 2016.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 6304:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016):
            Nov. 30, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 9, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 239 (Friday, December 11, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 80151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27279]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules; Hearing of the Judicial 
Conference

AGENCY: Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy 
Procedure, Judicial Conference of the United States.

ACTION: Notice of Cancellation of Open Hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The following remote public hearing on proposed amendments to 
the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure has been canceled: Bankruptcy 
Rules Hearing on January 7, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Secretary, 
Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Judicial Conference 
of the United States, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One 
Columbus Circle NE, Suite 7-300, Washington, DC 20544, Telephone (202) 
502-1820, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bae8cfd6dfc9f9d5d7d7d3cecedfdfe5e9dfd9c8dfcedbc8c3fadbd594cfc9d9d5cfc8cec994ddd5cc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aefcdbc2cbddedc1c3c3c7dadacbcbf1fdcbcddccbdacfdcd7eecfc180dbddcdc1dbdcdadd80c9c1d8">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Announcements for this hearing were 
previously published in 85 FR 48562.

    Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073.

    Dated: December 8, 2020.
Rebecca A. Womeldorf,
Chief Counsel, Rules Committee Staff.
[FR Doc. 2020-27279 Filed 12-10-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 27.40 Test to determine resistance to dust.

Components, subassemblies, or assemblies, the normal functioning of which might be affected by dust, such as coal or rock dust, shall be tested in an atmosphere containing an average concentration (50 million minus 40 micron particles per cubic foot) of such dust(s) for a continuous period of 4 hours. The component, subassembly, or assembly shall function normally after being subjected to this test.

Note:

Dust measurements, when necessary, shall be made by impinger sampling and light-field counting technique.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCommercial non-aerospace technology transfer program for the 2000s: Strategic analysis and implementationThis report presents a strategic analysis and implementation plan for NASA's Office of Commercial Programs (OCP), Technology Transfer Division's (TTD), Technology Transfer Program. The main objectives of this study are to: (1) characterize the NASA TTD's environment and past organizational structure; (2) clearly identify current and prospective programmatic efforts; (3) determine an evolutionary view of an organizational structure which could lead to the accomplishment of NASA's future technology transfer aims; and (4) formulate a strategy and plan to improve NASA's (and other federal agencies) ability to transfer technology to the non-aerospace sectors of the U.S. economy. The planning horizon for this study extends through the remainder of the 1990s to the year 2000.Document ID19930004245Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHorsham, Gary A. P.*(NASA Headquarters Washington, DC United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1992Subject CategoryUrban Technology And TransportationReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-4424NAS 1.15:4424Accession Number93N13433Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930004245.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 31
                                  ----------


                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------

        I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

        1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
        Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in
        respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report,
        of CWALT, Inc., Alternative Loan Trust 2004-17CB;

        2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
        whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
        omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
        in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
        not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
        report;

        3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
        required to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under
        the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in
        these reports is included in these reports;

        4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
        master servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement
        and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required
        under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the
        master servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;
        and

        5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
        master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards
        based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
        after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single
        Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set
        forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is
        included in these reports.

        In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
        information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
        Bank of New York, as Trustee.

        Date: March 29, 2005

                                  /s/ Steve Bailey
                                  -----------------
                                  Steve Bailey
                                  Senior Managing Director
In-Person Attendees: Commercial and Industrial Equipment: Public Meeting & Availability of the Framework Document for Refrigerated Beverage Vending Machines

Meeting Date: Thursday, June 20, 2013

Name Title Organization Street City State Zip Phone Fax

Altman, Ari General Counsil N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Bapanapalli, Ph.D., 

Satish

Senior Research 

Scientist/Engineer

Pacific Northwest National 

Laboratory (PNNL)

902 Battelle Boulevard

(MSIN: K5-22)

Richland WA 99352 509-375-3630 509-375-2379

Brookman, Douglas Facilitator Public Solutions, Inc. 108 Newburg Avenue Baltimore MD 21228 410-719-0580 410-719-0581

Collins, Jim Director of Engineering Automated Merchandising Systems 255 West Burr Boulevard Kearneysville WV 25430 304-725-6921 304-725-6921

Davies, Stephen M. N/A US Army, USA-OBT 2521 S. Clark Street, Suite 

1010

N/A N/A N/A 703-601-9573 N/A

Llenza, Charles F. Project 

Manager/Engineer

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence 

Avenue, SW

Washington DC 20585 202-586-2192 202-287-1590

Mathis, James R. Regulatory Lab 

Manager

Crane Merchandising Systems 3330 Dixie Narco 

Boulevard

Williston SC 29853-0719 803-266-5000

x 379

803-266-5041

Mau, Michael Senior Refrigeration 

Engineer

Royal Vendors, Inc. 426 Industrial Boulevard Kearneysville WV 25430 304-728-7056 

x 445

304-725-6579

Menzer, Mark N/A N/A 11112 Chessington Place Reston VA 20194 703-435-4433 N/A

Morris, Scott Statistician and Energy 

Analyst

Pacific Northwest National 

Laboratory (PNNL)

902 Battelle Boulevard 

P.O. Box 999, MSIN K6-05

Richland WA 99532 509-372-6454 N/A

Negandhi, Dipak J. Vice-President Roayl Vendors, Inc. Bardane Industrial Park, 

426 Industrial Boulevard

Kearneysville WV 25430 304-728-8069 

x 329

304-725-4728

Present, Elaina N/A Navigant Consulting, Inc. 1200 19th Street, N.W. 

Suite700

Washington DC N/A 202-973-4504 N/A

Sachs, Ph.D, Harvey Senior Fellow,

Buildings Program

American Council for an EnergyEfficient Economy (ACEEE)National Press Building

529 14th Street NW

Suite 600

Washington DC 20045 202-507-4014 202-429-2248

Weber, Collin Consultant Navigant Consulting 1801 K Street NW

Suite 500

Washington DC 20006 202-973-2400

Main

202-973-2401
§ 91.10 Consolidated program year. ( a ) Each of the following programs shall be administered by a jurisdiction on a single consolidated program year, established by the jurisdiction: CDBG, ESG, HOME, HOPWA, and HTF. Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the program year shall run for a twelve month period and begin on the first calendar day of a month.
( b ) Once a program year is established, the jurisdiction may either shorten or lengthen its program year to change the beginning date of the following program year, provided that it notifies HUD in writing at least two months before the date the program year would have ended if it had not been lengthened or at least two months before the end of a proposed shortened program year.
( c ) See subpart E of this part for requirements concerning program year for units of general local government that are part of a consortium.
[60 FR 1896, Jan. 5, 1995, as amended at 80 FR 5219, Jan. 30, 2015]
#### In the Matter of Cup & Saucer Cottage Restaurant, Inc., Appellant, v. New York State Liquor Authority, Respondent.

Order, entered on October 3,1962, reversed, on the law, the determination annulled, and the matter remanded to respondent for proceedings not inconsistent with this determination, without costs to either party. The premises of the petitioner are located at 132 West 32nd Street, Borough of Manhattan, where it has operated a bona fide restaurant continuously since 1926. Its application, though recommended for approval by the New York City Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, was denied by respondent on the ground that disapproval was mandatory under subdivision 7 of section 64 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law. The church referred to in the proceedings is on 31st Street, and is recessed some 46 feet from 32nd Street. The address of the ehureh is 135 West 31st Street. It is part of a complex administered by a religious order, which includes bmldmgs or offices not occupied exclusively as a place of worship. It is apparent from the foregoing that the premises for which the license is sought are not on the same street or avenue on which the place of worship is located. The -application should be granted and the license issued. (Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, § 64, suibd. 7.) Concur — Breitel, McNally and Stevens, JJ.; Botein, P. J., and Rabin, J., dissent and vote to affirm.
### §15301. General pipeline jurisdiction

(a) In General.—The Board has jurisdiction over transportation by pipeline, or by pipeline and railroad or water, when transporting a commodity other than water, gas, or oil. Jurisdiction under this subsection applies only to transportation in the United States between a place in—

(1) a State and a place in another State;

(2) the District of Columbia and another place in the District of Columbia;

(3) a State and a place in a territory or possession of the United States;

(4) a territory or possession of the United States and a place in another such territory or possession;

(5) a territory or possession of the United States and another place in the same territory or possession;

(6) the United States and another place in the United States through a foreign country; or

(7) the United States and a place in a foreign country.

(b) No Jurisdiction Over Intrastate Transportation.—The Board does not have jurisdiction under subsection (a) over the transportation of property, or the receipt, delivery, storage, or handling of property, entirely in a State (other than the District of Columbia) and not transported between a place in the United States and a place in a foreign country except as otherwise provided in this part.

(c) Protection of States Powers.—This part does not affect the power of a State, in exercising its police power, to require reasonable intrastate transportation by carriers providing transportation subject to the jurisdiction of the Board under this chapter unless the State requirement is inconsistent with an order of the Board issued under this part or is prohibited under this part.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §106(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 922.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 10501 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3441 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3441

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to apply the child tax 
 credit with respect to a taxable year to a child born within 9 months 
after the close of the taxable year and to a child who is stillborn or 
                 dies in utero during the taxable year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 2005

 Mr. Garrett of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. Paul, Mr. Hostettler, Mr. 
  Bachus, and Mr. Smith of New Jersey) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to apply the child tax 
 credit with respect to a taxable year to a child born within 9 months 
after the close of the taxable year and to a child who is stillborn or 
                 dies in utero during the taxable year.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Expecting Parents Relief Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF CHILD TAX CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 24 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to the child tax credit) is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
            ``(3) Child born within 9 months after close of taxable 
        year.--A child born within 9 months after the close of the 
        taxable year shall be treated as a qualifying child for such 
        taxable year. A credit allowable under this section with 
        respect to any child described in the preceding sentence shall 
        be allowed for the taxable year in which the child is born.
            ``(4) Child who is stillborn or dies in utero.--A child who 
        is stillborn or dies in utero, whose death was not the result 
        of a medical procedure, the ingestion of a drug, or other 
        action intended by the child's mother to result in the abortion 
        of the child, shall be treated as a qualifying child for the 
        taxable year in which the child dies.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made in subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to children who are born, stillborn, or die in utero 
in taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.1621 Crew instructions.

Prior to engaging in well-completion or well-workover operations, crew members shall be instructed in the safety requirements of the operations to be performed, possible hazards to be encountered, and general safety considerations to protect personnel, equipment, and the environment. Date and time of safety meetings shall be recorded and available for BSEE review.
#### FLORENCE *vs.*PASCHAL, Adm’r.

[APPEAL EEOJI ORDER DISSOLVING INJUNCTION. ]

*Notice of motion to dissolve injunction; what insufficient.*— Notice to complainants that application will be made to the chancellor in vacation to dissolve an injunction “at Lafayette, in Chambers county, Ala., or at such place as said chancellor may be required to be by law, ” is void for uncertainty.

Appeal from the Chancery Court of Russell.

Heard before Hon. B. B. McCeaw.

The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion,

J. L. Pugh, for appellant.

Hooper, *contra.*

B. F. SAFFOLD, J.

The only question of error submitted in this case is the interlocutory order, in vacation, dissolving the injunction, made on the 24th of October, 1871. The complainants were notified that, ten days after the service of the notice, the defendants would make application for a dissolution of the injunction “ to the chancellor at Lafayette, Chambers county, Ala., or at such place as said chancellor may be required to be by law at the date of the expiration of said ten days.”

The statute requires ten days notice of the application to be given to the complainant or his solicitor. — Rev. Code, § 3488. Of course, the time and place when the application will be made must be stated in the notice. This stat*459ute provides for a migratory court barely within the verge of legislative discretion, and must be strictly construed.

There can be no doubt that the notice is void for uncertainty. The time designated might have been the same for which some court of the chancellor was appointed. But whether the law required him to be there or not would depend on many contingencies. If he had been summoned elsewhere as a witness in certain cases, or if he or some member of his family had been sick, the law would have excused his attendance on his court. The complainants could not have been required to seek him at Lafayette, because he was not expected to be there, if there was any necessity for him to be anywhere *else.*— State *v. Allen,*33 Ala. 422.

The decree is reversed, and the cause remanded.
§ 28.22 Notice of disapproval. ( a ) If, upon completion of the evaluation by MSHA conducted in accordance with § 28.10, it is determined that the fuse does not meet the minimum requirements set forth in this part, MSHA shall issue a written notice of disapproval to the applicant.
( b ) Each notice of disapproval shall be accompanied by all available findings with respect to the defects of the fuse for which approval was sought with a view to the possible correction of any such defects.
( c ) MSHA shall not disclose, except to the applicant upon written request or when required by statute or regulation, any data, findings, or other information with respect to any fuse for which a notice of disapproval is issued.