alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HOMECOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. FOR THE THREE-MONTH PERIOD
ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>        
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,435
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  900,639
<ALLOWANCES>                                    96,345
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               816,095
<PP&E>                                         493,763
<DEPRECIATION>                                 126,816
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,804,868
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,594,261
<BONDS>                                        100,224
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           192
<OTHER-SE>                                    (995,511)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,804,868
<SALES>                                         16,032
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               909,177
<CGS>                                            8,787
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  340,893
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               933,783
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (10,500)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,524
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (374,650)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (374,650)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (374,650)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.19)
        

</TABLE>
### §§1336j, 1336k. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 1336j and 1336k were omitted as not of general application, and as covered by the Canal Zone Code. The Canal Zone Code was subsequently redesignated the Panama Canal Code by Pub. L. 96–70, §3303(b), and repealed by Pub. L. 104–201, §3549.

Section 1336j, act July 5, 1932, ch. 421, §1, 47 Stat. 576, related to equipment on ocean-going vessels using ports of Canal Zone.

Section 1336k, act July 5, 1932, ch. 421, §2, 47 Stat. 576, related to jurisdiction of violations.
###### Editorial Note on Part 985

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 985 appear at 64 FR 67983, Dec. 3, 1999.

#### § 985.211 Small rural PHA assessment records.

HUD shall maintain small rural PHA assessment files, including designations, notifications, appeals, corrective action agreements, and related correspondence for at least 3 years.
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive
        - U.S. AbilityOne Commission

#  U.S. AbilityOne Commission 

**Collected by:** Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive 

**Archived since:**Feb, 2013

**Description:**
Provide employment opportunities for people who are blind or have significant disabilities in the manufacture and delivery of products and services to the Federal Government.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal,     	    Military & Veterans,     	    Persons with Disabilities

**Language:**    	    English

**Collector:**    	    U.S. Government Publishing Office

## Narrow Your Results

**Coverage**

Sort By:
- Count
- (A-Z)
              - Twitter URL changed from https://twitter.com/abilityone75 to https://twitter.com/abilityoneprog. This change is first reflected in December 2020 crawl. (1)

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear

              - Sites
              - Search Page Text

Page 1 of 1  (10 Total Results)

**Sort By:**
                - Title (A-Z)
                - Title (Z-A)
                - URL (A-Z)
                - URL (Z-A)

### URL:     http://www.abilityone.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     http://www.abilityone.org/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://abilityone.oversight.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://plimsvote.abilityone.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://twitter.com/AbilityOneProg/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

**Coverage:**    	    Twitter URL changed from https://twitter.com/abilityone75 to https://twitter.com/abilityoneprog. This change is first reflected in December 2020 crawl.

### URL:     https://www.abilityone.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.abilityone.org/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.facebook.com/AbilityOne-272834715264/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.linkedin.com/company/us-abilityone-commission/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.youtube.com/user/AbilityOneProgram/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

Page 1 of 1  (10 Total Results)

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-50549

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERTO CARLOS SANCHEZ-GARCIA,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. P-96-CR-104-1

- - - - - - - - - -

August 20, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Roberto Carlos Sanchez-Garcia appeals his conviction and

sentence for importation and possession with intent to distribute

marijuana. He contends that the district court erred in denying

his motion to suppress because the border patrol agent at the

checkpoint lacked probable cause to search his vehicle. The

agent acted in compliance with the Fourth Amendment when he

questioned Sanchez and referred him to the secondary inspection

area for a canine “sniff.” See United States v. Hernandez, 976

F.2d 929, 930 (5th Cir. 1992). Once the canine alerted, the 
No. 97-50549

-2-

agent had probable cause to search the vehicle, at which point

the agent legally discovered marijuana secreted under the hood of

the car. Id. The district court did not err in denying

Sanchez’s motion to suppress. Id. 

AFFIRMED.
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley
Cornerstone Fund IV L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Christian
Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.








By: /s/Christian Angstadt

Name:	  Christian Angstadt
Title: Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management Corporation,
       the general partner of the Partnership

Date:  November 14, 2008
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.817 Temporary removal of subsurface safety devices for routine operations. ( a ) You may remove a wireline- or pumpdown-retrievable subsurface safety device without further authorization or notice, for a routine operation that does not require BSEE approval of a Form BSEE-0124, Application for Permit to Modify (APM). For a list of these routine operations, see § 250.601. The removal period must not exceed 15 days.
( b ) Prior to removal, you must identify the well by placing a sign on the wellhead stating that the subsurface safety device was removed. You must note the removal of the subsurface safety device in the records required by § 250.890. If the master valve is open, you must ensure that a trained person (see § 250.891) is in the immediate vicinity to attend the well and take any necessary emergency actions.
( c ) You must monitor a platform well when a subsurface safety device has been removed, but a person does not need to remain in the well-bay area continuously if the master valve is closed. If the well is on a satellite structure, it must be attended by a support vessel, or a pump-through plug must be installed in the tubing at least 100 feet below the mudline and the master valve must be closed, unless otherwise approved by the appropriate District Manager.
( d ) You must not allow the well to flow while the subsurface safety device is removed, except when it is necessary for the particular operation for which the SSSV is removed. The provisions of this paragraph are not applicable to the testing and inspection procedures specified in § 250.880.
### §1398. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act July 1, 1922, ch. 259, 42 Stat. 788, which related to quarantine and passport fees, was from the Navy Department and Naval Service Appropriation Act, 1923, was not repeated in subsequent years. See section 1642 of this title.
### §14104. Measurement to determine application of a law

(a) When the application of a law of the United States to a vessel depends on the vessel's tonnage, the vessel shall be measured under this part.

(b) If a statute allows for an alternate tonnage to be prescribed under this section, the Secretary may prescribe it by regulation. Any such regulation shall be considered to be an interpretive regulation for purposes of section 553 of title 5. Until an alternate tonnage is prescribed, the statutorily established tonnage shall apply to vessels measured under chapter 143 or chapter 145 of this title.

(c) The head of each Federal agency shall ensure that regulations issued by the agency that specify particular tonnages comply with the alternate tonnages implemented by the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 99–509, title V, §5101(3), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1920; Pub. L. 104–324, title VII, §702, Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3933.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### Revised section 14104

Source: Section (U.S. Code) 46 App. U.S.C. 71.

Section 14104 requires that a vessel be measured under Part J of this subtitle when the application of a U.S. law to the vessel depends on its tonnage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–324 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsecs. (b) and (c).
EXHIBIT 32.1

                         NATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual Report of National  Scientific  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Michael A. Grollman,  Director,  Chief Executive Officer, Acting Chief Financial
Officer and  Chairman of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in  all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date:  February 13, 2004


/s/ Michael A. Grollman
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael A. Grollman
Director, Chief Executive Officer, Acting Chief Financial Officer and Chairman
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SHAWALI KHAN,

Petitioner,

v. Civil Action No. 08-1101 (JDB)

BARACK OBAMA, et al.,

 Respondents.

ORDER

Respondents in this case are required to produce upon request a declassified factual

return. See Case Management Order (Feb. 20, 2009) at § I.A (dkt. ent. #81). According to

respondents, the declassified return may be shared only with the petitioner himself in light of its

"protected" status. At present, then, petitioner's counsel may not share the declassified return

with other individuals -- for example, experts or other witnesses -- who may need to review it in

pre-hearing preparations. Respondents appear to have recognized the difficulty with this position

and they have represented that they are reevaluating it. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED

that respondents shall provide a status report, in writing and by not later than March 11, 2009,

updating the Court with regard to their position on this matter. 

SO ORDERED.

 /s/ 

JOHN D. BATES

 United States District Judge

Date: March 4, 2009
#### § 964.330 Grant set-aside assistance.

The Department may make available five percent (5%) of any amounts available in each fiscal year (subsequent to the first funding cycle) available to eligible HAs to supplement grants previously awarded under this program. These supplemental grants would be awarded if the HA demonstrates that the funds cannot otherwise be obtained and are needed to maintain adequate levels of services to residents.
#### In the Matter of Mya Sherice B., Also Known as Mya B., Also Known as Mya L. SCO Family of Services, Respondent; Bernice Sherice L., Respondent; Mark B., Appellant. (Proceeding *No. 1.)*In the Matter of Eric Edward B., Also Known as Eric B. SCO Family of Services, Respondent; Bernice Sherice L., Respondent; Mark B., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)

[832 NYS2d 448]

In two related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, inter alia, to terminate the father’s parental rights on the ground of mental illness, the father appeals from two orders of fact-finding and disposition (one as to each child) of the Family Court, Kings County (Freeman, J.), both dated August 19, 2005, which, after a fact-finding hearing, found that he is unable to provide proper and adequate care for the subject children by reason of his mental illness, terminated his parental rights, and transferred guardianship and custody of the children to the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York and SCO Family of Services for the purpose of adoption.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the father’s contention, the Family Court properly found that there was clear and convincing evidence that he is presently and for the foreseeable future unable, by reason of mental illness, to provide proper and adequate care for the subject children *(see*Social Services Law § 384-b [4] [c]). In making its determinations, the Family Court properly relied, inter alia, upon the testimony of a qualified psychologist *(see*Social Services Law § 384-b [6] [c]; *Matter of Dederia S.C.,*26 AD3d 375 [2006]). Additionally, the proceedings that terminated the father’s parental rights did not violate due process *(see Matter of Nereida S.,*57 NY2d 636, 640 [1982]).

The father’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, *J.E,*Dillon, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. ("Company") Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 ("Report"), the undersigned
certifies that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 14, 2009

By: /s/ Debi Kokinos
--------------------
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
§ 92.208 Eligible community housing development organization (CHDO) operating expense and capacity building costs. ( a ) Up to 5 percent of a participating jurisdiction's fiscal year HOME allocation may be used for the operating expenses of community housing development organizations (CHDOs). This amount is in addition to amounts set aside for housing projects that are owned, developed, or sponsored by CHDOs as described in § 92.300(a). These funds may not be used to pay operating expenses incurred by a CHDO acting as a subrecipient or contractor under the HOME Program. Operating expenses means reasonable and necessary costs for the operation of the community housing development organization. Such costs include salaries, wages, and other employee compensation and benefits; employee education, training, and travel; rent; utilities; communication costs; taxes; insurance; equipment; materials; and supplies. The requirements and limitations on the receipt of these funds by CHDOs are set forth in § 92.300(e) and (f).
( b ) HOME funds may be used for capacity building costs under § 92.300(b).
[61 FR 48750, Sept. 16, 1996, as amended at 78 FR 44668, July 24, 2013]
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 350 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain individuals 

who have attained age 50 and who are unemployed to receive distributions from qualified retirement plans without incurring a 10 percent 

additional tax. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2005 

Mr. PLATTS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain individuals who have attained age 50 and who are 

unemployed to receive distributions from qualified retirement plans without incurring a 10 percent additional 

tax. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 350 IH 

1 SECTION 1. NO ADDITIONAL TAX ON DISTRIBUTIONS FROM 

2 QUALIFIED RETIREMENT PLANS TO CERTAIN 

3 INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE ATTAINED AGE 50 

4 AND WHO ARE UNEMPLOYED. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 72(t) of 

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to subsection 

7 not to apply to certain distributions) is amended by adding 

8 at the end the following new subparagraph: 

9 ‘‘(G) DISTRIBUTIONS TO CERTAIN INDIVID10 UALS WHO HAVE ATTAINED AGE 50 AND WHO

11 ARE UNEMPLOYED.— 

12 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Distributions to 

13 an individual after separation from em14 ployment if— 

15 ‘‘(I) as of the date of such dis16 tribution, such individual has attained 

17 age 50, 

18 ‘‘(II) such individual has received 

19 unemployment compensation for 12 

20 consecutive weeks under any Federal 

21 or State unemployment compensation 

22 law by reason of such separation, and 

23 ‘‘(III) such distribution is made 

24 during any taxable year during which 

25 such unemployment compensation is 

26 paid or any succeeding taxable year. 
3 

•HR 350 IH 

1 ‘‘(ii) REEMPLOYMENT AND SELF-EM2 PLOYMENT.—Rules similar to the rules of 

3 clauses (ii) and (iii) of subparagraph (D) 

4 shall apply for purposes of this subpara5 graph.’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 subsection (a) shall apply to distributions made after De8 cember 31, 2004. 

Æ
EXHIBIT 23.1



| |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                          
| |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  |  |  |  | PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Suite 1700 200 East Las Olas Blvd. Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Telephone (954) 764 7111 Facsimile (954) 525 4453



Report of
Independent Certified Public Accountants



To World Omni Financial Corp.:



We have audited, in accordance with auditing principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet of World Omni Financial Corp. (the Company) as of December 31, 2004 and the related consolidated statements of operations, of stockholders equity,
and cash flows for the year then ended, and have issued our report thereon dated February 14, 2005.



In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the Company failed to comply with the terms, covenants,
provisions, or conditions of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated July 8, 2004 (the Agreement) between World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2004-A (the Issuer), World Omni Auto Receivables LLC (the Seller), and
World Omni Financial Corp. (the Servicer) insofar as they relate to accounting matters. However, our audit was not directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance.



This report is being provided pursuant to Section 4.11 of the Agreement, and
is intended solely for the information and use of the board of directors and management of the Issuer, the Servicer, and the Seller and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Pricewaterhouse Coopers
|PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 
|February 14, 2005