alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 11

               Statement Re:  Computation of Earnings Per Share

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                   Three Months    Three Months
                                                       Ended           Ended
                                                     March 29,       March 30,
                                                       1998            1997
                                                   ------------    ------------
<S>                                                <C>             <C> 
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Average shares outstanding - Basic                       5,782           5,064

Shares issuable upon the exercise of
  outstanding stock options and warrants                   127             127
                                                   ------------    ------------

Weighted average shares outstanding - Diluted            5,909           5,191
                                                   ============    ============

Net income                                            $  1,168        $    845
                                                   ============    ============

Net income per share - Basic                          $   0.20        $   0.17
                                                   ============    ============

Net income per share - Diluted                        $   0.20        $   0.16
                                                   ============    ============
</TABLE>
§ 266.500 General. ( a ) *HFA responsibility for monitoring project owners.* The HFA will have full responsibility for managing and servicing projects insured under this part (in accordance with procedures disclosed and submitted with its application and the requirements of this part). The HFA is responsible for monitoring and determining the compliance of the project owner in accordance with the provisions of this subpart. HUD will monitor the performance of the HFA, not the project owner, to determine its compliance with the provisions covered under this subpart.
( b ) *HUD review of procedures for HFAs with Level II approval.* Asset management and servicing procedures of any HFA electing to take less than 50 percent of the risk on certain projects are subject to review, modification, and approval by HUD in accordance with § 266.100(b).
[85 FR 83444, Dec. 22, 2020]
EXHIBIT 13.2  Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Zena Capital Corp., a company organized under the British Columbia Company Act (the Company) on Form 20-F as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Roy Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Roy Brown Roy Brown, Chief Financial Officer   Date: June 29, 2006
#### In the Matter of Leonard Ravitch v. Trend Coats, Inc., et al.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellants procure the record on appeal and appellants’ points to .be served and filed on or before December 5, 1960, with notice of argument for the January 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Aurelio Resource Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-KSB for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Allan J. Marter, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.



|                    |  |  |  |                              |  |                     |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------- |  | ------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                    |  |  |  | AURELIO RESOURCE CORPORATION
|                    |  |  | 
|Date: April 2, 2008 |  |  |  | By:                          |  | /s/ Allan J. Marter
|                    |  |  |  |                              |  |                     |  | Allan J. Marter        
|                    |  |  |  |                              |  |                     |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a- 14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to Aurelio resource Corporation and will be retained by Aurelio Resource Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-KSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
filing.
Exhibit 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF ACCREDITED MORTGAGE LOAN REIT TRUST



|1. | Accredited Mortgage Loan Trust 2002-1, a wholly owned subsidiary of Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Accredited Mortgage Loan Trust 2002-2, a wholly owned subsidiary of Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Accredited Mortgage Loan Trust 2003-1, a wholly owned subsidiary of Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|4. | Accredited Mortgage Loan Trust 2003-2, a wholly owned subsidiary of Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|5. | Accredited Mortgage Loan Trust 2003-3, a wholly owned subsidiary of Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|6. | Accredited Mortgage Loan Trust 2004-1, a wholly owned subsidiary of Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|7. | Accredited Mortgage Loan Trust 2004-2, a wholly owned subsidiary of Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|8. | Accredited Mortgage Loan Trust 2004-3, a wholly owned subsidiary of Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|9. | Accredited Mortgage Loan Trust 2004-4, a wholly owned subsidiary of Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|10. | Accredited Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-1, a wholly owned subsidiary of Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|11. | Accredited Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-2, a wholly owned subsidiary of Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|12. | Accredited Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-3, a wholly owned subsidiary of Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|13. | Accredited Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-4, a wholly owned subsidiary of Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3418 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 3, 2006 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater 

Study and Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of 

the Interior to participate in the Central Texas Water 

Recycling and Reuse Project, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

HR 3418 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Central Texas Water 

3 Recycling Act of 2006’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Reclamation Wastewater and 

6 Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (Public Law 102– 

7 575; 43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) is amended by inserting after 

8 section 16ll the following new section: 

9 ‘‘SEC. 16ll. CENTRAL TEXAS WATER RECYCLING AND 

10 REUSE PROJECT. 

11 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in coopera12 tion with the City of Waco and other participating commu13 nities in the Central Texas Water Recycling and Reuse 

14 Project is authorized to participate in the design, plan15 ning, and construction of permanent facilities to reclaim 

16 and reuse water in McLennan County, Texas. 

17 ‘‘(b) COST SHARE.—The Federal share of the costs 

18 of the project described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 

19 25 percent of the total cost. 

20 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—The Secretary shall not provide 

21 funds for the operation and maintenance of the project 

22 described in subsection (a). 

23 ‘‘(d) SUNSET OF AUTHORITY.—The authority of the 

24 Secretary to carry out any provisions of this section shall 

25 terminate 10 years after the date of enactment of this sec26 tion.’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
3 

HR 3418 RFS 

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

2 in section 2 of Public Law 102–575 is amended by insert3 ing after the item relating to section 16ll the following: 

‘‘Sec. 16ll. Central Texas Water Recycling and Reuse Project.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 2, 2006. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
Exhibit 10.5.5

                    FOURTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated as of January 5, 2004,
is by and between InteliData  Technologies  Corporation,  a Delaware corporation
and Alfred S. Dominick,  Jr.  ("Executive") and amends the Employment  Agreement
dated April 5, 1999, and previously  amended on April 5, 2002,  January 14, 2003
and April 2, 2003 between InteliData and the Executive as follows:

     1.   Section  2 of  the  Employment  Agreement  shall  be  replaced  in its
          entirety by the following:

          "2. Term. The period of employment shall be from April 5, 1999 through
          April 5, 2005, unless sooner terminated as herein set forth."

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the parties have  executed  this FOURTH  AMENDMENT TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT as of the fifth day of January 2004.

                                InteliData Technologies Corporation



                                By:  /s/ Patrick F. Graham
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                    Patrick F. Graham
                                    Chairman, Compensation Committee of
                                    the Board of Directors

                                    /s/ Alfred S. Dominick, Jr.
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                    Alfred S. Dominick, Jr.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Clifton Askew, Appellant, v. J. Edwin La Vallee, as Warden of Clinton Prison, Respondent.

Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Bergan, P. J., Coon, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.
#### § 990.225 Transition determination.

The determination of the amount and period of the transition funding shall be based on the difference in subsidy levels between the formula set forth in this part and the formula in effect prior to implementation of the formula set forth in this part. The difference in subsidy levels will be calculated using FY 2004 data. When actual data are not available for one of the formula components needed to calculate the formula of this part for FY 2004, HUD will use alternate data as a substitute (*e.g.*, unit months available for eligible unit months, etc.) If the difference between these formulas indicates that a PHA shall have its operating subsidy reduced as a result of this formula, the PHA will be subject to a transition policy as indicated in § 990.230. If the difference between these formulas indicates that a PHA will have its operating subsidy increased as a result of this formula, the PHA will be subject to the transition policy as indicated in § 990.235.

[70 FR 54997, Sept. 19, 2005; 70 FR 61367, Oct. 24, 2005]
§ 92.210 Troubled HOME-assisted rental housing projects. ( a ) The provisions of this section apply only to an existing HOME- assisted rental project that, within the HOME period of affordability, is no longer financially viable. For purposes of this section, a HOME assisted rental project is no longer financially viable if its operating costs significantly exceed its operating revenue. HUD may approve one or both of the actions described in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section to strategically preserve a rental project after consideration of market needs, available resources, and the likelihood of long-term viability of the project.
( b ) Notwithstanding § 92.214, a participating jurisdiction may request and HUD may permit, pursuant to a written memorandum of agreement, a participating jurisdiction to invest additional HOME funds in the existing HOME-assisted rental project. The total HOME funding for the project (original investment plus additional investment) must not exceed the per-unit subsidy limit in § 92.250(a). The use of HOME funds may include, but is not limited to, rehabilitation of the HOME units and recapitalization of project reserves for the HOME units (to fund capital costs). If additional HOME funds are invested, HUD may require the period of affordability to be extended, based on such considerations as the amount of additional HOME funds or additional units.
( c ) HUD Headquarters may, through written approval, permit the participating jurisdiction to reduce the number of HOME-assisted units, if the project contains more than the minimum number of units required to be designated as HOME-assisted under § 92.205(d). In determining whether to permit a reduction in the number of HOME-assisted units, HUD will take into account the required period of affordability and the amount of HOME assistance provided to the project.
[78 FR 44669, July 24, 2013]
|    |                                                        |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | OHA Funding GP, LLC, a Texas limited liability company |

|    |                                                     |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | OHA Nevada, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company |

|    |                                              |
|----|----------------------------------------------|
| 3. | OHA Funding, LP, a Texas limited partnership |

|    |                                                               |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| 4. | OHA Asset Holdings GP, LLC, a Texas limited liability company |

|    |                                                     |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------|
| 5. | OHA Asset Holdings, LP, a Texas limited partnership |

|    |                                                        |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------|
| 6. | OHA Asset Holdings II, LP, a Texas limited partnership |

|    |                                                         |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------|
| 7. | OHA Asset Holdings III, LP, a Texas limited partnership |

|    |                                                       |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------|
| 8. | OHA Asset Holdings V, LP, a Texas limited partnership |

|    |                                                        |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------|
| 9. | OHA Asset Holdings VI, LP, a Texas limited partnership |

|     |                                                             |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------|
| 10. | OHA/OCI Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
### **CHAPTER 141—GENERAL**

Sec.
14101.
Definitions.
[14102.
Repealed.]
14103.
Delegation of authority.
14104.
Measurement to determine application of a law.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1990**—Pub. L. 101–595, title VI, §603(12)(B), Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2993, struck out item 14102 "Regulations".
July 26, 2011

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

EARL BRYAN WILSON AND CHEATWOOD ELECTRIC A/K/A/ C M 

CHEATWOOD ELECTRIC A/K/A CMC ELECTRIC, Appellants

NO. 14-10-00598-CV V.

KELLIE MARTINEZ, Appellee

____________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, KELLIE 

MARTINEZ, signed June 3, 2010, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have 

inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the trial 

court AFFIRMED.

We order appellants, EARL BRYAN WILSON AND CHEATWOOD ELECTRIC

A/K/A/ C M CHEATWOOD ELECTRIC A/K/A CMC ELECTRIC, jointly and 

severally, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. We further order this decision certified 

below for observance.
#### (A) Ralph Bruno v. Fred Kosnac. (B) Jacob Lippman et al. v. New York Water Service Corporation et al.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellants procure the record on appeal and appellants’ points to be served and filed on or before January 31, 1961, with notice of argument for the March 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.
### §260. Provision of telemessaging service

#### (a) Nondiscrimination safeguards

Any local exchange carrier subject to the requirements of section 251(c) of this title that provides telemessaging service—

(1) shall not subsidize its telemessaging service directly or indirectly from its telephone exchange service or its exchange access; and

(2) shall not prefer or discriminate in favor of its telemessaging service operations in its provision of telecommunications services.

#### (b) Expedited consideration of complaints

The Commission shall establish procedures for the receipt and review of complaints concerning violations of subsection (a) or the regulations thereunder that result in material financial harm to a provider of telemessaging service. Such procedures shall ensure that the Commission will make a final determination with respect to any such complaint within 120 days after receipt of the complaint. If the complaint contains an appropriate showing that the alleged violation occurred, the Commission shall, within 60 days after receipt of the complaint, order the local exchange carrier and any affiliates to cease engaging in such violation pending such final determination.

#### (c) "Telemessaging service" defined

As used in this section, the term "telemessaging service" means voice mail and voice storage and retrieval services, any live operator services used to record, transcribe, or relay messages (other than telecommunications relay services), and any ancillary services offered in combination with these services.

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title II, §260, as added Pub. L. 104–104, title I, §101(a), Feb. 8, 1996, 110 Stat. 79.)
§ 1210.155 What reports must I submit for Federal onshore stripper oil properties? ( a ) *General.* Operators who have been granted a reduced royalty rate by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) under 43 CFR 3103.4-2 must submit Form ONRR-4377, Stripper Royalty Rate Reduction Notification, under 43 CFR 3103.4-2(b)(3).
( b ) *Reporting options.* You may find Form ONRR-4377 at *http://www.onrr.gov/FM/Forms/AFSOil_Gas.htm .* You may file the form: ( 1 ) Electronically by filling the form out in electronic format and submitting it to ONRR as an e-mail attachment; or
( 2 ) Manually by filling out the form and submitting it by: ( i ) U.S. Postal Service regular or express mail addressed to Office of Natural Resources Revenue (ONRR), P.O. Box 25165, Denver, CO 80225-0165; or
( ii ) Special courier or overnight mail addressed to Office of Natural Resources Revenue, Building 85, Room A-614, Denver Federal Center, West 6th Ave. and Kipling Blvd., Denver, Colorado 80225.
[48 FR 35641, Aug. 5, 1983, as amended at 76 FR 76615, Dec. 8, 2011; 77 FR 25879, 25880, May 2, 2012]
### §765c. ITU functions

#### (a) Technical coordination

The Commission and United States satellite companies shall utilize the International Telecommunication Union procedures for technical coordination with INTELSAT and its successor entities and separated entities, rather than INTELSAT procedures.

#### (b) ITU notifying administration

The President and the Commission shall take the action necessary to ensure that the United States remains the ITU notifying administration for the privatized INTELSAT's existing and future orbital slot registrations.

(Pub. L. 87–624, title VI, §644, as added Pub. L. 106–180, §3, Mar. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 56.)
### §57521. Termination of charter during national emergency

A charter under this chapter shall provide that during a national emergency proclaimed by the President or a period for which the President has proclaimed that the security of the national defense makes it advisable, the Secretary of Transportation may terminate the charter without cost to the United States Government on such notice to the charterer as the President determines.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1668.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 57521 | 46 App.:1202(d). | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title VII, §712(d), 49 Stat. 2010; Aug. 7, 1939, ch. 555, §1, 53 Stat. 1254; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(114), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 163. |

Section