alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Grafe , Jerom e (PEP ) From : Sent : To : Subject : Attachments : Lally , Patric k [Patrick.Lally@mail.house.gov ] Monday , Septembe r24 , 201 2 3:5 9 P M Grafe , Jerom e (DEP ) Re d Line/Blu e Lin e Connecto rComment s Marke yComment s Re d Line.Blu e Line1.pd f
Mr
. Grafe : Attached , pleas e fin d comment s i n suppor t o f th e Blu e Lin e extensio n projec t fro m Congressma n Ed Markey
. Fee l fre e t o contac t m e i f yo u hav e an yquestion s o rconcerns . Than k you , Patric k J Lall y Constituen t Service s Directo r Congressma n Edwar d J
. Marke y(MA-07 ) 5 Hig h Street , Suit e 10 1 Medford , Massachusett s 0215 5 P : 781-396-290 0 F : 781-396-322 0 Follo w Rep , Marke

yo n Facebook , YouTu.be , an d Twitte r Sig n u p fo rRep
. Markey' s e-newlette ra t http://markev.house.gov/siqnu p

1NATURA L RESOURCE S

RANKIN G DEMOCRA

T EDWAR D J
. MARKE Y 7T H DISTRICT , MASSACHUSETT S 210 8 RAYBUR N HOUS E OFFIC E BUILDIN G WASHINGTON , D C 20515-210 7 1202)225-283 6 DISTRICT OFFICES : ENERG Y AND COMMERCE 

# Congres

s o f tfj e Hmte b S>tate £ ^ouS e o f Ikpretfetttatibe

g MaWwtm , B C 20515-210 7 IWCONCOR D STREET , SUIT E 10 2 F R A M INGHAM , M A 0170 2 (608)875-230 0 5 HIG H STREET
. SUIT E 10 1 MEDFORD , M A 0215 5 (781)396-290 0 Septembe r 21,201 2 http://markey.house.go v
Mr
. Kennet

h Kimmel l Commissione

r Massachusett

s Departmen

t o f Environmenta

l Protectio

n On e Winte r Stree t Boston , Massachusett

s 02108 Dea r Commissione

r Kimmel : A s yo u know , i n 199

0 a n agreemen

t wa s reache dbetwee n loca l resident s an dth e Commonwealt

h o f Massachusett

s tha t wouldexpan

dan dmoderniz

e th e Bosto n area' s transi t syste mfollowin g th

e completion o f

th e Centra l Artery/Tunne

l project
. It

i s m y understandin

g tha t th e intention o f

th e agreemen

t wa s t o provid e alternative mode

s o f transportatio

n fo r Boston-are

aresident s i n orde r t o alleviat e congestio

n on loca l roadways an

dt o improve th

e air-qualit

y o f surroundin

g communitie s b

y expandin

g a n environmentall

y friendl y transi

t system . Severa l o f th e commitment

s mad e 2 2 year s ago , directly affec t

resident s i n m y district
. On e o f thes e proposal s involve dth

e extensio n o f th e Blu e Line (th e mai n transi t line fo r resident s o f th e Cit y o f Rever e an dth e Town o f Winthrop ) fro mBowdoin Statio n t o th e Charles/MG

H Re dLine statio

n vi aane w subway , allowin g direc

t transfe r betwee n thes e lines
. Thes

e ar e th e only majo

r subwa y line s tha t d o no t intersect
. Thi s project

woul d allo w fo r improve daccess t o Massachusett

s Genera l Hospita l fo r resident s i n surroundin

g lowe r incom e communitie s an

di s vitall y importan

t fo r patients , worker

s an dcommuter

s alike
. I t ha s com e t o m y attentio n tha t th e status o f thi s commitmen

t i s currentl

y unde r review
. I t i s m y stron g hop e tha t thi s obligation wil l b

e followe dthroug

h t o completion
. Than

k yo u i n advanc

e fo r you r consideration
. Sincerely ,

Edwar dJ
. Marke

y EJM/pj l

I'RifirE O ONRECYClt c PAPEft
### §51905. Flags and grave markers

Except as authorized under another law, the Secretary of Transportation may issue, at no cost, a flag of the United States and a grave marker to the family or personal representative of a deceased individual who served in the merchant marine of the United States in support of the armed forces of the United States or its allies during a war or national emergency.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(b), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1585.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 51905 | 46 App.:2005. | Pub. L. 100–324, §6, May 30, 1988, 102 Stat. 577. |

Section
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-53-2020]

On August 7, 2020, Aker Solutions, Inc., submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within FTZ 82, in Mobile, Alabama.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (85 FR 50802, August 18, 2020). On December 7, 2020, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: December 7, 2020.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2020-27139 Filed 12-9-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
[4910-13-PI

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ONCl!RRhNcr;S ROUTLNG SYM~OL Federal Aviation Administration INITIM.SIS'G

INrTlALS ..S1Ci 

# Ii

# Au

_ '-'--- ~I\TE" 

# !o/nj(u ROLJI'ING£\'MHOL



# - tDI DATE 

# c-~

to RQUTI~(;SYMROl 

# -100 

# lr,:;~"'1i~ AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTranspol1ation (DOT). Airworthiness Directivesj Airbus Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, and -243 RlN 2120-AA64 Airplanes, and Model A~30-300 Series Airplanes

ACTION: Final rule. DATE SUl\1MARY: We are adopting anew airworth.iness directive (AD) forthe products list 

### I

# ~L~y~!(() [Docket No. FAA-2010-0697j Directo.-ate Identifier 2010-NM-I02-AD; Amendme 

# 1(;4-735 22- Db 39-*****; AD 2010-**-**] 14 CFR Part 39

above. This AD 

### results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe 

### ~o,~,,-,---- condition all an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as: An A330 experienced an unconrnmnded engine #1 in flight spool down, which occun"edwhile applying fuel gravity feed procedure, inresponse to low pressure indications frail) aJ]fuel boost pumps, inboth left and right wings. The investigations revealed that the wing tank pressure switches PIN (part lllunber) HTE69000-1 had frozen due to water accumulated intheir external pati, causing spurious low pressure indications. lNITIAI.SiSiG ~"M_T,---- As perprocedure, the main pumps are then switched off, increasing the level ofunavailable fuel. This, incombination with very Jaw fuel quantities or another independent trapped fuel failure scenarios, can lead to fuel starvation on the affected engine(s). 

### * 

## ** I'M"
#### LANDER, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 10, 1905.)

Action by Jacob W. Lander against the city of New York. No opinion. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Driscoll v. City of New York, 78 App. Div. 52, 79 N. Y. Supp. 479.
§ 964.105 Role of the jurisdiction-wide resident council. ( a ) *Jurisdiction-wide resident council.* Resident councils may come together to form an organization which can represent the interest of residents residing in units under a HA's jurisdiction. This can be accomplished by the presidents of duly elected resident councils forming an organization, by resident councils electing a representative to the organization, or through jurisdiction-wide elections. If duly elected resident councils form such an organization, the HA shall recognize it as the voice of authority-wide residents for input into housing authority policy making.
( b ) *Function.* The jurisdiction-wide council may advise the Board of Commissioners and executive director in all areas of HA operations, including but not limited to occupancy, general management, maintenance, security, resident training, resident employment, social services and modernization priorities.
( c ) *Cooperation with other groups.* There shall be regularly scheduled meetings between the HA and the local duly elected resident council, and the jurisdiction-wide resident council to discuss problems, plan activities and review progress.
#### STROWGER et al., Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN BONDING & TRUST CO. of BALTIMORE CITY, Defendants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 6, 1903.)

Action by Walter S. Strowger and another against the American Bonding & Trust Company of Baltimore City, impleaded, etc.

No opinion. Defendants’ exceptions overruled, motion for new trial denied, and judgment ordered for the plaintiffs on the verdict, with costs.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 345 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to suspend the running of 

periods of limitation for credit or refund of overpayment of Federal 

income tax by veterans while their service-connected compensation determinations are pending with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2005 

Mr. PLATTS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to suspend 

the running of periods of limitation for credit or refund 

of overpayment of Federal income tax by veterans while 

their service-connected compensation determinations are 

pending with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RUNNING OF PERIODS OF LIMITATION SUS4 PENDED PENDING SERVICE-CONNECTED 

5 COMPENSATION DETERMINATIONS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6511 of the Internal Rev7 enue Code of 1986 (relating to limitation on credit or re-
2 

•HR 345 IH 

1 fund) is amended by redesignating subsection (i) as sub2 section (j) and by inserting after subsection (h) the fol3 lowing new subsection: 

4 ‘‘(i) RUNNING OF PERIODS OF LIMITATION SUS5 PENDED PENDING SERVICE-CONNECTED COMPENSATION

6 DETERMINATIONS.—If the claim for credit or refund of 

7 any tax imposed by subtitle A relates to an overpayment 

8 attributable to the determination by the Secretary of Vet9 erans Affairs that an individual is entitled to compensa10 tion under chapter 11 of title 38, United States Code, the 

11 running of the periods specified in subsections (a), (b), 

12 and (c) with respect to the individual shall be suspended 

13 during the period beginning on the date the individual 

14 submits a claim for such compensation and ending on the 

15 date of the determination by the Secretary of Veterans 

16 Affairs.’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

18 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by 

19 this section shall apply with respect to submissions 

20 of claims for compensation under chapter 11 of title 

21 38, United States Code, after December 31, 1995. 

22 (2) WAIVER OF LIMITATIONS.— 

23 (A) IN GENERAL.—If the credit or refund 

24 of any overpayment of tax resulting from a de25 termination described in subparagraph (B) is 
3 

•HR 345 IH 

1 prevented at any time by the operation of any 

2 law or rule of law (including res judicata), such 

3 credit or refund may nevertheless be allowed or 

4 made if the claim therefor is filed before the 

5 close of the 1-year period beginning on the date 

6 of the enactment of this Act. 

7 (B) DETERMINATION DESCRIBED.—A de8 termination is described in this subparagraph if 

9 the determination is made by the Secretary of 

10 Veterans Affairs under chapter 11 of title 38, 

11 United States Code, after December 31, 1995. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ASPEON INC.
MARCH 31, 2000 BALANCE SHEET AND ASPEON INC. STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND CASH
FLOWS FOR THE THREE MONTHS AND NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      11,358,400
<SECURITIES>                                 2,041,600
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,219,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (803,600)
<INVENTORY>                                 17,027,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            48,240,600
<PP&E>                                       8,511,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,807,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              92,174,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,523,400
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        5,441,900
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        93,800
<OTHER-SE>                                  64,849,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                92,174,800
<SALES>                                     13,703,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,369,700
<CGS>                                       10,353,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,122,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,577,700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (3,700)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             198,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,440,500)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (951,800)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,970,900)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,970,900)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.75)


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 21, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-40331 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JESUS PENA, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-98-CR-3-1

-------------------- Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jesus Pena, Jr., has appealed the district court’s judgment revoking his supervised release and imposing a 36-month term of imprisonment. The district court did not abuse its discretion in ordering that the sentence be served consecutively to a term of imprisonment imposed in cause number C-02-292 for the law violation which resulted in the revocation of his supervised release. See United States v. Alexander , 100 F.3d 24, 27 (5th Cir. 1996); see also U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(c), p.s., & comment. (n.6)No. 03-40331 -2- (2002); U.S.S.G. § 7B1.3(f), p.s. (2002). The statutory maximum 36-month sentence was not in violation of law and was not plainly unreasonable. See United States v. Stiefel , 207 F.3d 256, 259 (5th Cir. 2000) (standard of review).
AFFIRMED.
### §304. Waiver by license of claims to particular frequency or of electromagnetic spectrum

No station license shall be granted by the Commission until the applicant therefor shall have waived any claim to the use of any particular frequency or of the electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the previous use of the same, whether by license or otherwise.

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title III, §304, 48 Stat. 1083; Pub. L. 97–259, title I, §127(a), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1099; Pub. L. 102–538, title II, §204(a), Oct. 27, 1992, 106 Stat. 3543.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–538 substituted "waived" for "signed a waiver of".

1982—Pub. L. 97–259 substituted "electromagnetic spectrum" for "ether".
Exhibit 32.2**CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), Bruce D.Horn, Chief Financial Officer of Oplink Communications, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifiesthat, to the best of his knowledge:**1.**The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, to whichthis Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and**2.**The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition at the end of the period covered by the Quarterly Report and results ofoperations of the Company for the periods covered by the Quarterly Report.**In Witness Whereof,**the undersigned has set his hands hereto as of the 14th day of November, 2005.   /s/ Bruce D. Horn   Bruce D. Horn  Chief Financial Officer  This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SECand is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Actof 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Mary Spennacchio, Respondent, against Delco Appliance Division, General Motors Corporation, Appellant. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Sparrow Street is a public street in the City of Rochester, but the portion of it approaching appellant’s plant was unlighted, with no homes or sidewalks, and was used almost exclusively *858by appellant and its employees for access to the plant. In Winter appellant, apparently with the consent of city authorities, plowed out Sparrow Street to facilitate access to its plant. The appellant’s concession in the record is that it “ plowed out Sparrow Street as a gratuitous proposition to enable their people to get to work”. Claimant was driven to work by her husband on February 5, 1958. As they approached the plant driving in Sparrow Street snowdrifts caused other cars to be stuck; it was difficult to get by them to reach the “ loop ” on the appellant’s premises from which it would be usual that claimant would alight from the ear; and in this situation claimant got out of the car; started to walk and was injured. She has been allowed compensation and the question on appeal is whether the injury arose out of and in the course of employment. There are a number of cases involving injuries in public streets coming to work where compensation has been disallowed; but this case is distinguishable. Here the proof and concession would support a finding that in respect of snow conditions the employer took affirmative steps to aid ingress to its plant. In coming to work by private ear claimant would reasonably expect thait the employer would, as it had in the past, plow out this public street in which the employer had substantially exclusive use. The departure from this practice on February 5 prevented the ear in which claimant rode from getting onto the premises and contributed to her injury. If the employer provided a direct facility on a public street, such as a bus, for access to its plant, the case would fall within an easily recognized pattern. Here it did not do so much, but in inviting claimant to come by private car, rather than, for example, by bus, by a regular practice of keeping an approach street free from snow, it took enough control over the public approach as to assume a measure of responsibility to the claimant. We think this injury falls within that area. Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
MEPC 60/INF.14 

I:\MEPC\60\INF-14.doc 

ANNEX 

TYPE APPROVAL CERTIFICATION OF THE NK-O3 BLUEBALLAST SYSTEM 
MEPC 60/INF.14 

ANNEX 

Page 2 

I:\MEPC\60\INF-14.doc 
MEPC 60/INF.14 

ANNEX 

Page 3 

I:\MEPC\60\INF-14.doc 
MEPC 60/INF.14 

ANNEX 

Page 4 

I:\MEPC\60\INF-14.doc 

__________
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Harpreet S. Sangha, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB (Amendment No. 1) of Douglas Lake Minerals Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|Date:  November 2, 2006 | /s/ Harpreet S. Sangha
Harpreet S. Sangha 
President and Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------