alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      18,903,000
<SECURITIES>                                   203,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,363,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   584,000
<INVENTORY>                                    537,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,452,000
<PP&E>                                           3,169
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (772)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,890,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,027,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       177,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,499,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                35,890,000
<SALES>                                      6,193,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,997,000
<CGS>                                        1,788,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,640,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,335,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,126,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   576,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,550,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,550,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. ss 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Robert A. Morrison, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of HS3
Technologies Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to date a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this
annual report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
  disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
  about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business
  issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
  small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
  affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
  issuer's control over financial reporting; and.

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
  management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business
  issuer's internal controls and procedures for financial reporting.

Date: September 18, 2009

/s/ Robert A. Morrison
  Signature: Robert A.
MorrisonTitle: President and Director(Principal Executive Officer)

---
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Robert E.Sulentic, certify that:

1.                I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trammell Crow Company;

2.                Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)                Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)               Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)                Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of  theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a)                All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)               Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: May 10, 2004 | /s/ Robert E. Sulentic     |
|-------------------------|----------------------------|
|                    | Robert E.  Sulentic        |
|                    | *Chief  Executive Officer* |

 

----
#### § 880.211 Audit.

Where a non-Federal entity (as defined in 2 CFR 200.69) is the eligible owner of a project or a contract administrator under § 880.505 receiving financial assistance under this part, the audit requirements in 2 CFR part 200, subpart F, shall apply.

[80 FR 75941, Dec. 7, 2015]
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Gordon F. Dugan, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Gramercy Property Trust (the “registrant”);                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



Date: March 2, 2016



| | /s/ GORDON F. DUGAN           
| | ------------------------------
| | Name: Gordon F. DuGan         
| | Title: Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.2


 


AMENDMENT


OF


EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT


 


THIS
AMENDMENT is made effective as of August 1, 2010, between Chicago Board
Options Exchange, Inc. (the “Company”) and Edward J. Joyce (the “Employee”).


 


WHEREAS,
the Company and the Employee have entered into an Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement, effective as of December 31, 2009 (the “Employment
Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS,
the Company and the Employee now consider it desirable to amend the Employment
Agreement.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 18 of the Employment Agreement, the parties
mutually agree to further amend the Employment Agreement by substituting the
following for the second sentence of Section 3(c) of the Employment
Agreement:


 


“Options and other equity awards, if any, granted to
Employee under such a plan shall vest upon Employee’s retirement after
attaining age fifty-seven (57) and all vested options may thereafter be
exercised by Employee for the remainder of their term.”


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment on the date and year
first above written.


 


	
  CHICAGO BOARD OPTIONS EXCHANGE,
  INC.

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/
  Edward J. Joyce

  
	
   

  	
  Edward
  J. Joyce

  
	
  By:
  

  	
  /s/
  William J. Brodsky

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Chief
  Executive Officer and

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Chairman
  of the Board of Directors
Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
David F. Zucker, Chief Executive Officer of Midway Games Inc., certify that:

|      |                |  |                                  
|----- | -------------- |  | ---------------------------------
|      |                |  | /s/DAVID F. ZUCKERDavid F. Zucker
|Date: | August 6, 2004 |  | Chief Executive Officer          

---



I,
Thomas E. Powell, Chief Financial Officer of Midway Games Inc., certify that:

|      |                |  |                                    
|----- | -------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|      |                |  | /s/THOMAS E. POWELLThomas E. Powell
|Date: | August 6, 2004 |  | Chief Financial Officer            

---



QuickLinks
#### § 791.401 General.

This subpart D establishes the procedures for allocating budget authority under section 213(d) of the Act for the programs identified in § 791.101. It describes the allocation of budget authority by the appropriate Assistant Secretary to the applicable Program Office Director in the HUD field office, and by the Program Office Director to allocation areas within their jurisdiction.

[61 FR 10849, Mar. 15, 1996, as amended at 64 FR 26639, May 14, 1999]
sheets or ice caps, flow from high mountain areas and are present on all continents except Australia. In som

where the ice sheets reach the ocean, large floating ice shelves or floating glacier tongues are formed. Iceber

floating ice masses that have broken away from ice shelves, glacier tongues, or directly from the grounded 

in some locations. Sea ice, which is produced when saline ocean water is cooled below its freezing tempera

approximately -2°C or 29°F, extends on a seasonal basis over great areas of the ocean.

Sea ice and icebergs are both carried by winds and currents into warmer waters. Melt water from sea ice, ic

shelves, ice tongues, and icebergs does not contribute to sea level rise, because these ice masses already dis

equivalent amount of sea water. However, sea level rise is caused by the flow of grounded glacial ice into th

and by surface or subsurface melt water discharged from the glacier, if the sum of those amounts exceeds th

amount of ice accumulated from snowfall on the glacier or ice sheet.

Illustration of ice in the natural environment. Graphic courtesy of Christopher Shuman, Claire Parkinson, Dorothy Hall, Robert

Bindschadler, and Deborah McLean.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

September 22, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00382

- CR

IN RE Jaime FLORES , Relator

Original Proceeding 1

ORDER

I n accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on September 22, 2021

.

_____________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 22nd day of September, 2021

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz

, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding ar ises out of Cause No. 2006

- CR

- 6091
, styled The State of Texas v. Jaime Flores

.
#### O’BRIEN et al., Respondents, v. THOMAS et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division. First Department.

March 10, 1905.)

Appeal from Special Term. -Action by John O’Brien and another against Edward R. Thomas and others. From an order granting plaintiff’s motion to withdraw a juror, defendants appeal. Blodified. R. A. Irving, for appellants. J. W. Browne, for respondents.

PER CURIABI.

The order should be modified, by requiring the plaintiffs to pay $10 costs of motion, the term fee, and the. trial fee and disbursements of the term as a condition of granting the motion. As so modified, the order should be affirmed, without costs.
#### Gussie Martvoy, Appellant, v. City of New York et al., Respondents. Michael J. Musalo, Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Louis Ambrosio, Jr., et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Ambrosio Bros., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents. City of New York, Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Louis Ambrosio, Jr., et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business as Ambrosio Bros., Fourth-Party Defendants-Respondents.

Motion by respondents Montague Realty Co., Inc., Michael J. Musalo, and the City of New York, to dismiss the appeal, granted. Appeal dismissed, without costs (see *Mascia*v. *Torinese,*9 A D 2d, 772; Seventeenth Annual Report of N. Y. Judicial Council, 1951, pp. 208-210). Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
1 Thomas H. Adams, Executive Director American Coal Ash Association 15200 E. Girard Ave., Suite 3050 Aurora, CO 80014 720.870.7987 fax – 720.870.7889 www.acaa-usa.org 

# ACAA 

# Memo

To: Mathy Stanislaus, EPA Assistan t Administrator for Solid Waste and Emergency Response From: Thomas Adams CC: Barry Breen, Matt Hale, John Sager Date: August 11, 2009 Re: Wisconsin Beneficial Use Regulations

During our meeting of July 24, 2009, I observed that the state of Wisconsin had the highest level of beneficial use of coal combustion products of all 50 states. Interest was expressed in obtaining a copy of the Wisconsin beneficial use regulations. Please use the following link to obtain this information. http://www.legis.state.wi. us/rsb/code/nr/nr538.pdf
§ 1218.104 Exemption of States from certain interest and penalties. ( a ) States are exempt from being assessed for any interest or penalties found to be due against the Department of the Interior for failure to comply with the Emergency Petroleum Allocation Act of 1973, as amended, or any regulation issued by the Secretary of Energy thereunder concerning the certification or processing of crude oil taken in-kind as royalty by the Secretary.
( b ) Any State shall be assessed for its share of any overcharge resulting from a determination that DOI failed to comply with the Emergency Petroleum Allocation Act of 1973, as amended. Each State's share shall be assessed against monies owed to the State. Such assessment shall be first against monies owed to such State as a result of royalty audits prior to January 12, 1983, the enactment date of the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act of 1982, then against other monies owed. The State shall be liable for any balance.
( c ) A State's liability for repayment of an overcharge under this section shall exist for any amounts resulting from a judgment in a civil suit or as the result of settlement of a claim through a negotiated agreement. State liability would be offset against future mineral revenue distributions to the State.
[49 FR 37347, Sept. 21, 1984]
### §1413. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–260, div. FF, title IX, §902(b)(1), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 3206

Section, Pub. L. 112–96, title VI, §6103, Feb. 22, 2012, 126 Stat. 205, related to 470–512 MHz public safety spectrum.
§ 972.227 Public and resident consultation process for developing a conversion plan. ( a ) A conversion plan must be developed in consultation with appropriate public officials and with significant participation by residents of the development.
( b ) The requirement for consultation with public officials may be satisfied by obtaining a certification from the appropriate state or local officials that the conversion plan is consistent with that jurisdiction's Consolidated Plan. This may be the same certification as is required for the PHA Annual Plan that includes the conversion plan, so long as the certification specifically addresses the conversion plan.
( c ) To satisfy the requirement for significant participation by residents of the development, in addition to the public participation requirements for the PHA Annual Plan, a PHA must: ( 1 ) Hold at least one meeting with the residents of the affected sites (including the duly elected Resident Council, if any, that covers the development in question) at which the PHA must: ( i ) Explain the requirements of section 22 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 and these regulations, especially as they apply to residents of affected developments; and
( ii ) Provide draft copies of the conversion plan to them.
( 2 ) Provide a reasonable comment period for residents; and
( 3 ) Summarize the resident comments (as well as the PHA responses to the significant issues raised by the commenters) for HUD, and consider these comments in developing the final conversion plan.
### §53507. Nontaxation of deposits

(a) Tax Treatment.—Subject to subsection (b), under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 1 et seq.)—

(1) taxable income (determined without regard to this chapter and section 7518 of such Code (26 U.S.C. 7518)) for the taxable year shall be reduced by the amount deposited for the taxable year out of amounts referred to in section 53505(a)(1) of this title;

(2) a gain from a transaction referred to in section 53505(a)(3) of this title shall not be taken into account if an amount equal to the net proceeds (as defined in joint regulations) from the transaction is deposited in the fund;

(3) the earnings (including gains and losses) from the investment and reinvestment of amounts held in the fund shall not be taken into account;

(4) the earnings and profits of a corporation (within the meaning of section 316 of such Code (26 U.S.C. 316)) shall be determined without regard to this chapter and section 7518 of such Code (26 U.S.C. 7518); and

(5) in applying the tax imposed by section 531 of such Code (26 U.S.C. 531), amounts held in the fund shall not be taken into account.

(b) Condition.—This section applies to an amount only if the amount is deposited in the fund under the agreement within the time provided in joint regulations.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1594.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 53507 | 46 App.:1177(d). | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title VI, §607(d), 49 Stat. 2005; June 23, 1938, ch. 600, §§23–28, 52 Stat. 960; Aug. 4, 1939, ch. 417, §10, 53 Stat. 1185; July 17, 1952, ch. 939, §§17–19, 66 Stat. 764; Pub. L. 85–637, Aug. 14, 1958, 72 Stat. 216; Pub. L. 86–518, §1, June 12, 1960, 74 Stat. 216; Pub. L. 87–45, §6, May 27, 1961, 75 Stat. 91; Pub. L. 87–271, Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat. 570; restated Pub. L. 91–469, §21(a), Oct. 21, 1970, 84 Stat. 1028; Pub. L. 99–514, title II, §261(e)(1), (2), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2215. |

Section
### The Putnam Group of eastern Connecticut

By: H.R. Dixon

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1194C

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (894 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Exhibit
      32




**CERTIFICATION**




I,
      Nazzareno E. Paciotti, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
      of
      GVI Security Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. § 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that to my knowledge:




(i)
      The
      Company’s accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three months
      ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(ii)
      The
      information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Nazzareno E. Paciotti


Nazzareno
      E. Paciotti


Chief
      Executive Officer


Chief
      Financial Officer






Dated:
      August 15, 2005




19