U.S. Department of Homeland Security • U.S. Fire Administration

National Fire Data Center • Emmitsburg, Maryland 21727

www.usfa.dhs.gov/statistics/reports/index.shtm

Topical Fire Report Series Volume 10, Issue 4 / January 2010

Hotel and Motel Fires

These topical reports are designed to 

explore facets of the U.S. fire problem as 

depicted through data collected in the U.S. 

Fire Administration’s (USFA’s) National Fire 

Incident Reporting System (NFIRS). Each 

topical report briefly addresses the nature 

of the specific fire or fire-related topic, highlights important findings from the data, and 

may suggest other resources to consider for 

further information. Also included are recent 

examples of fire incidents that demonstrate 

some of the issues addressed in the report or 

that put the report topic in context.

Findings

■ An estimated 3,900 hotel and motel fires are reported to U.S. fire departments each year 

and cause an estimated 15 deaths, 150 injuries, and $76 million in property loss.

■ Hotel and motel fires are considered part of the residential fire problem. However, they 

comprise only approximately 1 percent of residential building fires.

■ Half of hotel and motel fires are small, confined fires. 

■ Cooking is the leading cause of hotel and motel fires (46 percent). Almost all hotel and motel 

cooking fires are small, confined fires (97 percent).

■ Eighteen percent of nonconfined hotel and motel fires extend beyond the room of origin. The 

leading causes of these larger fires are electrical malfunctions (24 percent), intentionally set 

fires (15 percent), and fires caused by open flames (12 percent). In contrast, 42 percent of all 

nonconfined residential building fires extend beyond the room of origin.

■ While bedrooms are the primary origin of nonconfined fires (23 percent), when confined 

cooking fires are considered, the kitchen or other cooking area is the most prevalent area of 

fire origin.

■ Hotel and motel fires are more prevalent in the cooler months due to increases in heating 

fires and peak in February (9 percent).

I

n 1980, the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 

estimated that 12,200 fires occurred in hotels and motels. 

By 1994, the estimated numbers of fires in hotels and 

motels had sharply declined—to a level at which the NFPA 

no longer produced separate annual survey estimates. Deaths 

and injuries resulting from these fires declined sharply as 

well. Today, the U.S. Fire Administration estimates that 3,900 

hotel and motel fires occur annually in the United States. 

What changed in the intervening years?

On December 7, 1946, fire broke out in the Winecoff 

Hotel in Atlanta, GA. The early morning fire spread quickly 

through the building, trapping many people in the upper 

floors. With only one exit stairway (that, unfortunately, provided a conduit for the fire as many of its doors had been 

propped open), no fire alarm system, and no fire sprinkler 

system, the 119 fatalities from this fire made it the deadliest hotel fire in U.S. history, and prompted many changes in 

building codes.

Three decades later, the lodging industry experienced a 

series of catastrophic fires that provided yet another call 

to action. In a 6-year-period, 190 people died and nearly 

1,000 were injured in 3 hotel fires. On November 21, 

1980, an early morning fire at the MGM Grand Hotel in Las 

Vegas, NV, killed 85 occupants and injured over 650. Three 

months later, on February 10, 1981, 8 people died and 

nearly 200 were injured in an evening fire at the Las Vegas 

Hilton Hotel. And, on December 31, 1986, an afternoon fire 

at the Dupont Plaza Hotel and Casino in San Juan, Puerto 

Rico, resulted in 97 fatalities and more than 140 injuries.

Investigations into these three fires revealed that smoke 

alarms and sprinkler systems could have mitigated the losses 

and, in many instances, prevented deaths and injuries had 

they been in place. In the years that followed, substantial 

code changes were implemented and the lodging industry 

redefined what “fire safe” meant in their industry.

While fires and fire losses still occur in hotels and motels, 

these changes and public education about preventing and 

surviving hotel fires were largely successful in reducing hotel and motel fires and losses. The numbers tell the 

story. From 2005 to 2007, hotel and motel fires, a subset 

of residential building fires, accounted for only 1 percent 

of the residential building fires responded to by fire departments across the Nation.1,2 These fires resulted in an annual 

average of approximately 15 deaths, 150 injuries, and $76 

million in property loss.

This topical report addresses the characteristics of hotel and 

motel fires reported to the National Fire Incident Reporting 

System (NFIRS) between 2005 and 2007. 

continued on next page
TFRS Volume 10, Issue 4/Hotel and Motel Fires Page 2

Type of Fire

Building fires consist of two major categories of incidents: 

fires that are confined to specific types of equipment or 

objects (confined fires) and those that are not (nonconfined 

fires). Confined building fires are small fire incidents that 

are limited in scope, confined to noncombustible containers, rarely result in serious injury or large content losses, 

and are expected to have no significant accompanying property losses due to flame damage.3

 Hotel and motel fires are 

evenly divided between small confined fires and the larger 

nonconfined fires as shown in Table 1. Cooking fires are the 

predominate type of confined fire.

Table 1. Hotel and Motel Fires by Type of Incident (2005–2007) 

Incident Type Percent

Nonconfined fires 50.2

Confined fires 49.8

Cooking fire, confined to container 36.9

Chimney or flue fire, confined to chimney or flue 2.1

Incinerator overload or malfunction, fire confined 0.3

Fuel burner/boiler malfunction, fire confined 2.2

Commercial compactor fire, confined to rubbish 0.4

Trash or rubbish fire, contained 8.0

Total 100.0

Source: NFIRS 5.0.

Note: Total may not add to 100 percent due to rounding.

Loss Measures

Table 2 presents losses, averaged over this 3-year-period, of reported residential building fires and hotel and motel fires.4

Table 2. Loss Measures for Hotel and Motel Fires (3-year-average, 2005–2007)

Measure Residential Building 

Fires Hotel and Motel Fires Confined Hotel and Motel Fires

Nonconfined Hotel and 

Motel Fires

Average Loss: N/A N/A N/A N/A

Fatalities/1,000 fires 5.4 2.5 0.0 5.0

Injuries/1,000 fires 28.1 31.7 8.5 54.7

Dollar loss/fire $14,560 $16,190 $150 $32,090

Source: NFIRS 5.0.

Note: Average loss for fatalities and injuries is computed per 1,000 fires; average dollar loss is computed per fire and is rounded to the nearest $10.

When Hotel and Motel Fires Occur

As shown in Figure 1, hotel and motel fires occur most 

frequently in the early evening hours, peaking from 6 

p.m. to 9 p.m. They then decline throughout the night, 

reaching the lowest point during the morning hours (3 

a.m. to 6 a.m.). Fire incidence rises, with an intermediate 

peak during breakfast hours, 8 a.m. to 9 a.m., tapering 

off slightly before an early afternoon intermediate peak 

between 2 p.m. and 3 p.m. The 3-hour-evening-period (6 

p.m. to 9 p.m.) accounts for 17 percent of hotel and motel 

fires.5
TFRS Volume 10, Issue 4/Hotel and Motel Fires Page 3

Figure 1. Hotel and Motel Fires by Time of Alarm (2005–2007)

Source: NFIRS 5.0.

Figure 2 illustrates that hotel and motel fire incidence is 

slightly higher in the cooler months, peaking in February (9 

percent). This slight increase is partially a result of increases 

in heating fires. Fire incidence declines steadily, reaching the 

lowest incidence in September (7 percent).

Figure 2. Hotel and Motel Fires by Month (2005–2007)

Source: NFIRS 5.0.
TFRS Volume 10, Issue 4/Hotel and Motel Fires Page 4

Causes of Hotel and Motel Fires

Forty-six percent of all hotel and motel fires are cooking 

fires as shown in Table 3. Nearly all of these cooking fires 

(97 percent) are small, confined fires with limited damage. 

The next four causes combined account for 26 percent of 

hotel and motel fires: fires caused by electrical malfunctions 

(7 percent), heating fires (7 percent), intentionally set fires 

(6 percent), and open flame fires (6 percent).6

Table 3. Leading Causes of Hotel and Motel Fires (2005–2007)

Cause Percent (Unknowns Apportioned)

Cooking 45.8

Electrical malfunction 7.3

Heating 7.2

Intentional 5.6

Open flame 5.6

Source: NFIRS 5.0.

Fire Spread in Hotel and Motel Fires

Nearly three-quarters of hotel and motel fires (73 percent) 

are confined to the object of origin (Figure 3). These fires 

are primarily coded as confined fires in NFIRS—68 percent 

of fires confined to the object of origin are confined fires.7

Few fires, 9 percent, extend beyond the room of origin. Of 

the ones that do, they are more likely to involve the entire 

building.

Figure 3. Extent of Fire Spread in Hotel and Motel Fires (2005–2007)

Source: NFIRS 5.0.

Confined fires are allowed abbreviated NFIRS reporting and 

many reporting details of these fires are not required and 

not reported. However, it is known that for time of alarm 

and cause, confined fires have considerable influence on the 

overall hotel and motel fire profile. Confined fires are the 

predominant fire incident between 7 a.m. and 10 a.m. and 

again between 4 p.m. and 10 p.m. Of the hotel and motel 

fires that occur during these two time periods, confined 

fires account for over half of them (56 percent). As these 

peak times include breakfast and dinner, it is not surprising that confined cooking fires account for 78 percent of 

continued on next page
TFRS Volume 10, Issue 4/Hotel and Motel Fires Page 5

the confined fires and 43 percent of all fires in hotels and 

motels that occur between 7 a.m. and 10 a.m. and again 

between 4 p.m. and 10 p.m. As well, nearly all (97 percent) 

cooking fires in hotels and motels are small, confined cooking fires. 

Nonconfined Fires

The next sections of this topical report will address nonconfined hotel and motel fires, the larger and more serious 

fires, where detailed fire data are available.

Causes of Nonconfined Hotel and Motel 

Fires

While cooking is the leading cause of hotel and motel fires 

overall, it only represents 3 percent of all nonconfined hotel 

and motel fires. Fires caused by electrical malfunctions (15 

percent), fires caused by open flames, appliances, and intentionally set fires (approximately 11 percent each) are the 

leading causes of nonconfined hotel and motel fires 

(Figure 4).

Figure 4. Causes of Nonconfined Hotel and Motel Fires (2005-2007)

Source: NFIRS 5.0.
TFRS Volume 10, Issue 4/Hotel and Motel Fires Page 6

Where Nonconfined Hotel and Motel Fires 

Start (Area of Fire Origin)

Twenty-three percent of nonconfined hotel and motel fires 

start in the bedroom (Table 4). Fires that begin in laundry 

areas (12 percent) and cooking areas and kitchens (10 percent) are the next leading areas of fire origin. Less common 

are fires that start in bathrooms (6 percent) and common 

rooms or lounge areas (4 percent).

Note that these areas of origin do not include areas associated with confined fires. As confined cooking fires are a 

substantial percentage of hotel and motel fires, it is likely 

that the kitchen is, by far, the leading area of fire origin for 

all hotel and motel fires.

Table 4. Leading Areas of Fire Origin in Nonconfined Hotel and Motel Fires (2005–2007)

Areas of Fire Origin Percent (Unknowns Apportioned)

Bedrooms 22.9

Laundry area 12.3

Cooking area, kitchen 10.3

Bathroom, checkroom, lavatory 6.3

Common room, den, family room, living room, lounge 3.7

Source: NFIRS 5.0.

How Nonconfined Hotel and Motel Fires 

Start (Heat Source)

Figure 5 shows sources of heat in nonconfined hotel and 

motel fires. Heat from powered equipment accounts for 55 

percent of nonconfined hotel and motel fires. Within that 

category, radiated or conducted heat from operating equipment accounts for 16 percent of all fires, electrical arcing 

accounts for 16 percent of all fires, and heat from other 

powered equipment accounts for 18 percent of all nonconfined hotel and motel fires. 

Heat from open flame or smoking materials accounts for 23 

percent of nonconfined hotel and motel fires. This category 

includes candles, cigarettes, lighters, and matches. The third 

largest category pertains to hot or smoldering objects (13 

percent). This category includes hot embers or ashes, molten, hot material, and heat sparked from friction.

Figure 5. Sources of Heat in Nonconfined Hotel and Motel Fires (2005–2007)

Source: NFIRS 5.0.
TFRS Volume 10, Issue 4/Hotel and Motel Fires Page 7

What Ignites First in Hotel and Motel Fires

Twenty-eight percent of the items first ignited in nonconfined hotel and motel fires fall under the “soft goods, wearing apparel category” (Figure 6). This category includes 

bedding (blankets, sheets, or comforter), clothing (not on a 

person), and linens. The second leading category, “general 

materials,” accounts for 22 percent of nonconfined 

hotel and motel fires and third is “structural component or 

finish” (20 percent). 

Electrical wire, cable insulation (10 percent), linen other 

than bedding (9 percent), and bedding including blankets, 

sheets, and comforters (7 percent) are the specific items 

most often first ignited in nonconfined hotel and motel 

fires.

Figure 6. Item First Ignited in Nonconfined Hotel and Motel Fires (2005–2007)

Source: NFIRS 5.0.

Fire Spread

Figure 7 shows the fire spread in nonconfined hotel and 

motel fires. The majority of even the nonconfined fires, 82 

percent, are limited to the object or room of fire origin—in 

47 percent of nonconfined fires, the fire is confined to the 

object of origin; in another 35 percent of fires, the fire is 

confined to the room of origin. Eighteen percent of nonconfined hotel and motel fires extend beyond the room of 

origin. The leading causes of these larger fires are electrical malfunctions (24 percent), intentionally set fires (15 

percent), and fires caused by open flames (12 percent). In 

contrast, 42 percent of all nonconfined residential building 

fires extend beyond the room of origin. Automatic extinguishing systems (AESs) may have a role in containing hotel 

and motel fires as discussed in a later section. 
TFRS Volume 10, Issue 4/Hotel and Motel Fires Page 8

Figure 7. Extent of Fire Spread in Nonconfined Hotel and Motel Fires (2005–2007)

Source: NFIRS 5.0.

Factors Contributing to Ignition in 

Nonconfined Hotel and Motel Fires

Table 5 shows the factors contributing to ignition of nonconfined hotel and motel fires. By far, the leading factor 

contributing to the ignition of hotel and motel fires is the 

misuse of material or product (43 percent). A heat source 

too close to combustible materials (33 percent) and abandoned or discarded materials (31 percent) accounts for the 

majority of the fires in this category. 

Electrical failure or malfunction is a contributing factor in 22 percent of nonconfined hotel and motel fires. 

Operational deficiency and mechanical failures and malfunctions are the third and fourth leading factors at 15 and 

12 percent respectively. The remaining factors account for 

13 percent of nonconfined hotel and motel fires.

Table 5. Factors Contributing to Ignition for Nonconfined Hotel and Motel Fires

(Where Factors Contributing to Ignition are Specified, 2005–2007)

Factors Contributing to Ignition Percent of Nonconfined Hotel and Motel Fires

Misuse of material or product 42.8

Electrical failure, malfunction 22.2

Operational deficiency 15.2

Mechanical failure, malfunction 12.3

Other factors contributing to ignition 6.3

Fire spread or control 3.4

Natural condition 1.7

Design, manufacture, installation deficiency 1.1

Source: NFIRS 5.0.

Notes: 1) Includes only incidents where factors that contributed to the ignition of the fire were specified.

2) Multiple factors contributing to fire ignition may be noted for each incident; total will exceed 100 percent. 
TFRS Volume 10, Issue 4/Hotel and Motel Fires Page 9

Suppression/Alerting Systems in Hotel 

and Motel Fires

Smoke alarm data are available for both confined and nonconfined fires, although for confined fires, the data are very 

limited in scope. AES data are only available for nonconfined 

fires.

Smoke alarms were present in 72 percent of nonconfined 

hotel and motel fires and were known to have operated in 

44 percent of nonconfined hotel and motel fires. In 14 

percent of nonconfined hotel and motel fires, there were no 

smoke alarms present (Table 6). In another 13 percent of 

these fires, firefighters were unable to determine if a smoke 

alarm was present. In 10 percent of nonconfined hotel and 

motel fires where smoke alarms were present, the alarm 

failed to operate.

In 20 percent of confined hotel and motel fires, the smoke 

alarm effectiveness was unknown (Table 7). Smoke alarms 

operated and alerted occupants in 69 percent of these confined fires. In 11 percent of confined hotel and motel fires, 

the occupants were not alerted by the smoke alarm.8

 Note 

that the data presented in Table 6 and Table 7 are the raw 

counts from the NFIRS data set and not scaled to national 

estimates of smoke alarms in hotel and motel fires.

Table 6. NFIRS Smoke Alarm Data for Nonconfined Hotel and Motel Fires

(NFIRS, 2005-2007)

Presence of Smoke 

Alarms Smoke Alarm Operational Status Smoke Alarm Effectiveness Count Percent

Present

Fire too small to activate smoke alarm 320 9.0

Smoke alarm operated

Smoke alarm alerted occupants, occupants 

responded

1,246 34.9

Smoke alarm alerted occupants, occupants failed to 

respond

107 3.0

No occupants 122 3.4

Smoke alarm failed to alert occupants 21 0.6

Undetermined 79 2.2

Smoke alarm failed to operate 254 7.1

Undetermined 432 12.1

None present 510 14.3

Undetermined 475 13.3

Total Incidents 3,566 100.0

Source: NFIRS 5.0.

Notes: The data presented in this table are raw data counts from the NFIRS data set. They do not represent national estimates of smoke alarms in hotel and motel fires. They are presented for informational purposes. 

Total may not add to 100 percent due to rounding.

Table 7. NFIRS Smoke Alarm Data for Confined Hotel and Motel Fires (NFIRS, 2005-2007)

Smoke Alarm Effectiveness Count Percent

Smoke alarm alerted occupants 2,434 68.9

Smoke alarm did not alert occupants 382 10.8

Unknown 717 20.3

Total Incidents 3,533 100.0

Source: NFIRS 5.0.

Notes: The data presented in this table are raw data counts from the NFIRS data set. They do not represent national estimates of smoke alarms in hotel and motel fires. They are presented for informational purposes. 

Total may not add to 100 percent due to rounding.
TFRS Volume 10, Issue 4/Hotel and Motel Fires Page 10

Overall, full or partial AESs were present in 41 percent of 

nonconfined hotel and motel fires (Table 8). The presence 

of suppression systems was substantially higher in nonconfined hotel and motel fires than in all residential building 

nonconfined fires (3 percent only). This use of AES may 

account for the containment of nonconfined hotel and 

motel fires to the room or object of origin as seen in 

Figure 7.

Table 8. NFIRS Automatic Extinguishing System (AES) Data for Nonconfined 

Hotel and Motel Fires (2005-2007)

AES Presence Count Percent

AES present 1,445 40.5

Partial system present 9 0.3

AES not present 1,910 53.6

Unknown 202 5.7

Total Incidents 3,566 100.0

Source: NFIRS 5.0.

Notes: The data presented in this table are raw data counts from the NFIRS data set. They do not represent national estimates of AESs in nonconfined hotel and motel fires. They are presented for informational 

purposes. Totals may not add to 100 percent due to rounding.

Examples

The following are some recent examples of hotel and motel 

fires. These were all reported by the media.

•	 April 2009: Fire in an Indianapolis, IN, hotel left 3 

people with minor injuries and dozens looking for other 

places to stay. Firefighters contained the fire and evacuated everyone inside the hotel. The cause of the fire is 

still undetermined.9

•	 April 2009: A fire at the Carroll Valley Resort in Fairfield, 

PA, was started from a discarded cigarette. The cigarette 

was thrown into a pile of pine needles which spread 

fire from a pine tree to the hotel roof. No one was 

injured, and firefighters were able to extinguish the fire. 

Regardless of the lack of a sprinkler system, the hotel 

sustained only minor damage, partially due to favorable 

weather conditions and temperatures.10

•	 April 2009: Limited water pressure made it difficult 

to extinguish a devastating fire at a Ramada Inn in 

Longview, TX. More than 50 crews responded to the fire. 

Investigators believe the fire started in the attic but have 

not determined an official cause. The hotel was deemed 

to be a complete loss.11

•	 February 2009: An unspecified electrical problem 

caused a fire at the Villa Town Hotel in Lubbock, TX. 

Hotel guests were evacuated, and the fire was contained. 

Investigators noted that electrical problems were common in older buildings with relatively older electrical 

work.12

Conclusion

The incidence of hotel and motel fires has substantially 

decreased, probably from stricter codes and public education. While only 1 residential building fire in 100 is a 

hotel or motel fire, the potential for loss of life, injuries, 

and damage is substantial. The challenge for communities 

and the fire service is to pinpoint the reasons why and how 

hotel and motel fires still occur and to address these issues 

to prevent future fires, fire casualties, and property damage. 

NFIRS Data Specifications for Hotel and 

Motel Fires

Data for this report were extracted from the NFIRS annual 

Public Data Release (PDR) files for 2005, 2006, and 2007. 

Only version 5.0 data were extracted.

Hotel and Motel fires are defined as:

•	 Incident Types 111 to 123:

Incident 

Type Description

111 Building fire

112 Fires in structure other than in a building

113 Cooking fire, confined to container

114 Chimney or flue fire, confined to chimney or flue

115 Incinerator overload or malfunction, fire confined

116 Fuel burner/boiler malfunction, fire confined

117 Commercial compactor fire, confined to rubbish

118 Trash or rubbish fire, contained

120 Fire in mobile property used as a fixed structure, other

121 Fire in mobile home used as fixed residence

122 Fire in motor home, camper, recreational vehicle

123 Fire in portable building, fixed location
TFRS Volume 10, Issue 4/Hotel and Motel Fires Page 11

Note that Incident Types 113 to 118 do not specify if the 

structure is a building.

Incident Type 112 is included as previous analyses 

have shown that Incident Types 111 and 112 are used 

interchangeably.

•	 Aid Types 3 (mutual aid given) and 4 (automatic 

aid given) are excluded to avoid double counting of 

incidents.

•	 Property use 449 is included to specify hotel and motel, 

commercial.

•	 Structure Type:

– 1—Enclosed building,

– 2—Fixed portable or mobile structure, and

– Structure Type not specified (null entry).

To request additional information or to comment on this 

report, visit http://www.usfa.dhs.gov/applications/feedback/index.jsp

Notes: 

1National estimates are based on 2005-2007 native version 5.0 data from the National Fire Incident Reporting System 

(NFIRS) and residential structure fire loss estimates from the National Fire Protection Association’s annual surveys of fire loss. 

Fires are rounded to the nearest 100, deaths to the nearest 5, injuries to the nearest 25, and loss to the nearest $million.

2In NFIRS, version 5.0, a structure is a constructed item of which a building is one type. In previous versions of NFIRS, the 

term “residential structure” commonly referred to buildings where people live. To coincide with this concept, the definition 

of a residential structure fire for NFIRS 5.0 has, therefore, changed to include only those fires where the NFIRS 5.0 Structure 

Type is 1 or 2 (enclosed building and fixed portable or mobile structure) with a residential property use. Such fires are 

referred to as “residential buildings” to distinguish these buildings from other structures on residential properties that may 

include fences, sheds, and other uninhabitable structures. In addition, incidents that have a residential property use, but do 

not have a structure type specified are presumed to be buildings.

3NFIRS distinguishes between “content” and “property” loss. Content loss includes loss to the contents of a structure due to 

damage by fire, smoke, water, and overhaul. Property loss includes losses to the structure itself or to the property itself. Total 

loss is the sum of the content loss and the property loss. For confined fires, the expectation is that the fire did not spread 

beyond the container (or rubbish for Incident Type 118) and hence, there was no property damage (damage to the structure 

itself) from the flames. There could be, however, property damage as a result of smoke, water, and overhaul.

4The average fire death and fire injury loss rates computed from the national estimates will not agree with average fire death 

and fire injury loss rates computed from NFIRS data alone. The fire death rate computed from national estimates would be 

(1,000*(15/3,900)) = 3.8 deaths per 1,000 hotel and motel fires and the fire injury rate would be (1,000*(150/3,900)) 

= 38.5 injuries per 1,000 hotel and motel fires. 

5For the purposes of this report, the time of the fire alarm is used as an approximation for the general time the fire started. 

However, in NFIRS, it is the time the fire was reported to the fire department.

6The U.S. Fire Administration cause hierarchy was used to determine the cause of hotel and motel fire incidents: http://

www.usfa.dhs.gov/fireservice/nfirs/tools/fire_cause_category_matrix.shtm

7In NFIRS, confined fires are defined by Incident Type codes 113 to 118.

8In confined fires, the entry “smoke alarm did not alert occupants” can mean: no smoke alarm was present, the smoke alarm 

was present but did not operate, or the smoke alarm was present and operated but the occupant was already aware of the 

fire.

9“3 minor injuries in Indianapolis hotel fire,” chicagotribune.com/news, April 12, 2009. http://archives.chicagotribune.

com/2009/apr/12/travel/chi-ap-in-indianapolishotel (accessed April 30, 2009).

10Katharine Harmon, “Fire damages Carroll Valley Resort,” eveningsun.com, April 16, 2009. 

http://www.eveningsun.com/ci_12150161?source=most_viewed (accessed April 21, 2009).
TFRS Volume 10, Issue 4/Hotel and Motel Fires Page 12

11Jamaal E. O’Neal, “Crews fight hotel fire, limited water pressure,” news-journal.com, April 15, 2009. 

http://www.news-journal.com/news/content/news/stories/2009/04/15/04152009_ramada_fire.html (accessed April 

30, 2009).

12“Electrical problem blamed for motel blaze,” lubbockonline.com, February 3, 2009. http://www.lubbockonline.com/stories/020309/loc_384475693.shtml (accessed April 30, 2009).