alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 21**

**Subsidiaries of the Registrant        **

|                                                 |   | **State or   Other   Jurisdiction of   Incorporation** |   | **Percentage   Ownership** |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------|
|                                                 |   |                                                        |   |                            |
| **Parent**                                           |   |                                                   |   |                       |
| Kentucky First Federal Bancorp                       |   | United States                                          |   | N/A                        |
| **Subsidiaries (1)**                                 |   |                                                   |   |                       |
| First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Hazard |   | United States                                          |   | 100%                       |
| Frankfort First Bancorp, Inc.                        |   | Delaware                                               |   | 100%                       |
| First Federal Savings Bank of Frankfort (2)          |   | United States                                          |   | 100%                       |
| Main Street Financial Services, Inc. (3)             |   | Kentucky                                               |   | 100%                       |
### §§39, 40. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 39, act Feb. 27, 1925, ch. 360, §1, 43 Stat. 1011, authorized the President to complete a general utility topographical survey of the territory of the United States within a period of twenty years from Feb. 27, 1925.

Section 40, act Feb. 27, 1925, ch. 360, §2, 43 Stat. 1011, related to cooperative agreements with States to expedite completion of topographical survey.
### §765. Access to INTELSAT

#### (a) Access permitted

Beginning on March 17, 2000, users or providers of telecommunications services shall be permitted to obtain direct access to INTELSAT telecommunications services and space segment capacity through purchases of such capacity or services from INTELSAT. Such direct access shall be at the level commonly referred to by INTELSAT, on March 17, 2000, as "Level III".

#### (b) Rulemaking

Within 180 days after March 17, 2000, the Commission shall complete a rulemaking, with notice and opportunity for submission of comment by interested persons, to determine if users or providers of telecommunications services have sufficient opportunity to access INTELSAT space segment capacity directly from INTELSAT to meet their service or capacity requirements. If the Commission determines that such opportunity to access does not exist, the Commission shall take appropriate action to facilitate such direct access pursuant to its authority under this chapter and the Communications Act of 1934 [47 U.S.C. 151 et seq.]. The Commission shall take such steps as may be necessary to prevent the circumvention of the intent of this section.

#### (c) Contract preservation

Nothing in this section shall be construed to permit the abrogation or modification of any contract.

(Pub. L. 87–624, title VI, §641, as added Pub. L. 106–180, §3, Mar. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 55.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Communications Act of 1934, referred to in subsec. (b), is act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, 48 Stat. 1064, which is classified principally to chapter 5 (§151 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 609 of this title and Tables.
#### Burrel E. Leffler, defendant in error, v. Henry Wardein, plaintiff in error.

Assumpsit arising out of contract to furnish building materials and labor. Judgment for defendant. Error to the City Court of City of Alton; the Hon. L. D. Yager, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed July 2, 1923.

Rehearing denied October 23, 1923.

B. J. O’Neill, for plaintiff in error. Wm. P. Boynton, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Barry

delivered the opinion of the court.
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
| 3.1    | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Navistar International Corporation effective July 1, 1993. Filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 1993, which was dated and filed on January 27, 1994. Commission File No. 001-9618, and amended as of May 4, 1998. |
|   |   |
| 3.2    | Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation, filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware effective February 17, 2011. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K, which was dated and filed on February 17, 2011. Commission File No. 001-09618. |
|   |   |
| 3.3    | Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation, filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware effective February 21, 2012. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K, which was dated and filed on February 21, 2012. Commission File No. 001-09618. |
|   |   |
| 3.4    | Certificate of Retirement of Stock filed with the Secretary of State for the State of Delaware effective July 30, 2003 retiring the Class B common stock of Navistar International Corporation in accordance with the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Navistar International Corporation. Filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2003, which was dated and filed on September 12, 2003. Commission File No. 001-09618. |
|   |   |
| 3.5    | Third Amended and Restated By-Laws of Navistar International Corporation effective October 5, 2012. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K, which was dated and filed on October 10, 2012. Commission File No. 001-09618. |
|   |   |
| 3.6    | Certificate of Elimination of Junior Participating Preferred Stock, Series A filed with the Secretary of State for the State of Delaware on June 20, 2012, which has the effect of eliminating the Junior Participating Preferred Stock, Series A originally filed with the Secretary of State for the State of Delaware on July 23, 2007. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K which was dated and filed on June 20, 2012. Commission File No. 001-09618. |
|   |   |
| 3.7    | Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Junior Participating Preferred Stock, Series A filed with the Secretary of State for the State of Delaware on June 20, 2012 establishing the Series A Preferred Stock of Navistar International Corporation in accordance with the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Navistar International Corporation. Filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K which was dated and filed on June 20, 2012. Commission File No. 001-09618. |
### §1204. Grant program for remote community alert systems

#### (a) Grant program

The Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, shall establish a program under which grants may be made to provide for outdoor alerting technologies in remote communities effectively unserved by commercial mobile service (as determined by the Federal Communications Commission within 180 days after October 13, 2006) for the purpose of enabling residents of those communities to receive emergency alerts.

#### (b) Applications and conditions

In conducting the program, the Under Secretary—

(1) shall establish a notification and application procedure; and

(2) may establish such conditions, and require such assurances, as may be appropriate to ensure the efficiency and integrity of the grant program.

#### (c) Sunset

The Under Secretary may not make grants under subsection (a) more than 5 years after October 13, 2006.

#### (d) Limitation

The sum of the amounts awarded for all fiscal years as grants under this section may not exceed $10,000,000.

(Pub. L. 109–347, title VI, §605, Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 1940.)
#### Harry Weinberg v. Louis Greiss.

Motion for an order transferring appeal to Enumerated Calendar of this court granted and both appeals are to be heard on the May 17, 1962 Enumerated Calendar of this court. Respondent’s points on the Non-Enumerated appeal are to be served and filed on or before May 4,1962. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 99.7**

**News Release****August 18, 2000**

**Trading Symbols:**TRBD (EASDAQ)

**TURBODYNE FILES AMENDMENT TO ANNUAL REPORT**

**Carpinteria, California—August 18, 2000**—Turbodyne Technologies Inc. (EASDAQ: TRBD) filed an amendment to its Annual Report on Form 10-K405/A with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and withthe Market Authority of EASDAQ. The complete filing is available at http://www.freeedgar.com or through the respective link on the Company’s homepage.

Turbodyne Technologies Inc., a California based high technology company, specializes in the development of charging technology for internal combustion engines plus the development and manufacturing of high-tech assemblies forelectrically assisted turbochargers and superchargers. Turbodyne Technologies Inc.’s headquarters is located in Carpinteria, CA; the European business location is Frankfurt, Germany. 

Contacts:

Kenneth Fitzpatrick, VP Group Finance—Investor Relations: (805) 684-4551Markus Kumbrink, Turbodyne Europe Investor Relations: +49-69-69-76-73-13

****
CM£ \\b-. 0S-CA-OI3<p8Wt^8ZJA/-tf

?£Tmokl££ RECEIVED IN

COURTOF CRIMINAL APPEALS

>& JAN 05 2015 § 0P

THE SUftTE DP ~Eyp& Abel Acosta, Clerk $££iltoikiftL APfeflLS

'MftTtail ft*. EtfTEMSlQU OP TiME TO FlL£ ?DR

^ MOU). ^dfcbdttftWU tCTTtoUER. m Pis ^ KhDTO^ Pc* w4

**>«*. ft m *f tws wrmou, }ni« s^ ^e ^ ife tai*^

I.

nans flPife fl^ffi fifj^agnt ^^Btiaa^^

"Re (m urns tenia) om flftw.i4.3hn, '

IE.

^e tew Deidube w* a*» the penTM *_ te&no« ^e,B

&&UEST.

FILED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPFa; c

JAN 12 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk
'JflL

VaH&MDT irtFOWlEft CFlfte bEQSod DF-tfte CGlifcr kf A$ft&£ IK flfrfcmiiB to CfcSE

mmL?-Ute^iD,-3tort.- sn<!e ~w -w«e temiora. to& to4 flrremPTfue, To oam lgbal

lkifc£» tavrM Tifff fc mil NOT &fftES»tr Mm.^ ufe fom»4 ft£ imEmwtf

uwabfeferm**. MS ite ttwer 6eto ite taw toEnao ^

teftout foe fions ite itimou fee JKOETtoa^ iZeukw (U Otoifc to.

RtmsHEe ?eo as

. TtJCJ'" IUo%333

"*»i IteWOMBtirOF CawwBL TuSKffi:

CatTltttlE Of SOOCt

^^

?&TlT(,e*4ER ppd-«
/lb. Louise Pearekk ten

CfiUfcrOf d£!ML ;fttfc«J3

?,& fort U30t

tou,7* m/i

E**s toe to itf to J6 bng iwa, ^ MM tf ml "•»£ ft iCTto to bBtaMlAW toflU. ftflffi fl(£ Tft f^ UJfTtt TW£ »s

* TSB Cfc MQ KikE, IT TB Tfe 4TrtMT7£W Of TJfe flttier.

*J*t Ort-TE-SW -Ms t^TK MBHUN tl TO mffTlHZ MM& suuai

"£fl& DfflitMErtr of admit just^t
§ 1220.020 Calculation of the allowance for capital recovery. ( a ) For purposes of this section, the cost base for the allowance for capital recovery in a particular month shall consist of the sum of: ( 1 ) All allowable direct and allocable joint costs chargeable to the NPSL capital account during the month less any costs specified in § 1220.012(c); plus
( 2 ) The value of contract services chargeable to the NPSL capital account during the month pursuant to § 1220.011(e); plus
( 3 ) The capital recovery period overhead allowance, calculated in accordance with § 1220.012(a), that is chargeable to the NPSL capital account for the month; less
( 4 ) Production revenues and other credits received during the month.
( b ) If the cost base for a month is greater than zero (that is, if the sum of the charges specified in paragraphs (a) (1) through (3) of this section exceeds the value of production revenues and other credits), the allowance for capital recovery shall be calculated by multiplying the cost base by the capital recovery factor, and shall be debited to the NPSL capital account as specified in § 1220.021(b).
( c ) If the cost base for a month is less than zero, the allowance for capital recovery for the NPSL capital account shall be calculated by multiplying the resulting negative cost base by the capital recovery factor. The negative product of this calculation shall be debited to the NPSL capital account as specified in § 1220.021(b).
( d ) No allowance for capital recovery shall be calculated on the charges or credits related to any time period after the end of the capital recovery period.
[45 FR 36800, May 30, 1980, as amended at 75 FR 61087, Oct. 4, 2010]
### §51101. Policy

It is the policy of the United States that merchant marine vessels of the United States should be operated by highly trained and efficient citizens of the United States and that the United States Navy and the merchant marine of the United States should work closely together to promote the maximum integration of the total seapower forces of the United States.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(b), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1568.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 51101 | 46 App.:1126–1(a) (1st sentence). | Pub. L. 94–361, title VI, §603(a) (1st sentence), July 14, 1976, 90 Stat. 929. |
| | 46 App.:1295 (1st sentence). | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title XIII, §1301 (1st sentence), as added Pub. L. 96–453, §2, Oct. 15, 1980, 94 Stat. 1997. |

Section
Control Strategies: Background and Overview 

Summary and Organization 

This section of the TSD describes the consideration of possible control measures and their 

inclusion or elimination from consideration as part of the overall control strategies in the various 

SIPs supported by the modeled attainment demonstrations. 

A basic description of the process to be employed is followed by four sections, each addressing 

one of the fundamental sectors of the emissions inventories (area sources, large stationary point 

sources, off-road mobile sources, and on-road mobile sources). 

Requirements 

Section 172 of the CAA requires that each attainment plan “provide for the implementation of all 

reasonably available control measures as expeditiously as practicable (including such reductions 

in emissions from existing sources in the area as may be obtained through the adoption, at a 

minimum, of reasonably available control technology), and shall provide for attainment of the 

NAAQS”

EPA interprets RACM as referring to measures of any type that may be applicable to a wide 

range of sources (mobile, area, or stationary), whereas RACT refers to measures applicable to 

stationary sources. Thus, RACT is a type of RACM specifically designed for stationary sources. 

RACT would be determined as part of the broader RACM analysis, and identification of all 

measures (for stationary, mobile, and area sources) that are technically and economically 

feasible. 

In general, the combined approach to RACT and RACM includes the following steps: 

o identification of potential measures that are reasonable 

o modeling to assess attainment by the attainment date 

o selection of RACT and RACM 

Section 172 does not include any specific applicability thresholds to identify the size of sources 

that States and EPA must consider in the RACT and RACM analysis. 

For each technologically feasible control technology or measure, the State should provide the 

following information: 

o control efficiency, by pollutant (PM2.5, SO2, NOX, VOC) 

o possible emission reductions by pollutant 

5.a - 1
o estimated $/ton reduced 

o date by which the measure could be reasonably implemented 

The cost effectiveness of a technology is expressed as its annualized cost divided by the 

emissions reduced per year ($/ton.) When making a determination as to whether an available 

control technology or measure is economically feasible, there are certain factors that should be 

taken into consideration. Similar sources may have different marginal costs, profit margins and 

abilities to pass costs through to the consumer. These factors are appropriate to consider. 

Seasonal controls are acceptable, in situations such as Utah’s, where PM and Ozone violations 

occur in winter and summer respectively. 

Source Categories 

In examining emission controls, it is helpful to categorize the sources of those emissions into the 

same basic groupings used in the compiling the emissions inventories: stationary point sources, 

area sources, non-road mobile sources, and on-road mobile sources. Each is discussed in turn. 

5.a - 2
Exhibit 12.1
 COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(in thousands)
 Fiscal Year
    
    
    Fiscal Year
    
    
    Fiscal Year
    
    
    Fiscal YearEnded
    
    
    Ended
    
    
    Ended
    
    
    Ended
    
    
    Fiscal YearOctober 1,
    
    
    September 30,
    
    
    September 29,
    
    
    September 27,
    
    
    Ended2005
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2008
    
    
    October 3, 2009Earnings:(Loss) income before income taxes
    
    $
    (128,155
    )
    
    $
    (4,577
    )
    
    $
    (12,310
    )
    
    $
    (20,276
    )
    
    $
    5,920Preferred stock dividend requirement
    
    
    (11,013
    )
    
    
    (15,718
    )
    
    
    (23,919
    )
    
    
    (32,980
    )
    
    
    (42,991
    )Fixed charges
    
    
    50,183
    
    
    
    55,417
    
    
    
    65,642
    
    
    
    72,103
    
    
    
    77,398Total adjusted earnings
    
    
    (88,985
    )
    
    
    35,122
    
    
    
    29,413
    
    
    
    18,847
    
    
    
    40,327Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    
    32,527
    
    
    
    33,781
    
    
    
    36,145
    
    
    
    33,812
    
    
    
    29,708Interest portion of net rental expense
    
    
    6,643
    
    
    
    5,918
    
    
    
    5,578
    
    
    
    5,311
    
    
    
    4,699Preferred stock dividend requirement
    
    
    11,013
    
    
    
    15,718
    
    
    
    23,919
    
    
    
    32,980
    
    
    
    42,991Total fixed charges
    
    
    50,183
    
    
    
    55,417
    
    
    
    65,642
    
    
    
    72,103
    
    
    
    77,398Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Deficiency of earnings to cover fixed
charges
    
    
    139,168
    
    
    
    20,295
    
    
    
    36,229
    
    
    
    53,256
    
    
    
    37,071
# AIRWORTHINESS

DIRECTIVE

CIVIL AVI ATION AUTHORIT Y

CZECH RE PUBLIC

Airp ort Ruzyn e , 160 0 8 Pra gue 6

tel: 420- 2- 32408 6, fax: 420- 2- 36411 2 

### Number: CAA-AD-4-0 99/98

Date of issu e: Decem ber 30, 1998

LET, a

. s., Kunov i ce

AEROTE CH NIK CZ s.r. o., Kun o vice

L 13, L 13A, L 13AC, L 13S W

, L 13SE, ++



## SAILPLANE - ELEVAT OR - INSPE C T I ON/COL OR MARKING

Applicability : Sailp lan e L13

, all m o d e ls and serial nu m b ers, certificated i n any category. Powere d

sailp lan e L13

- Viv a t, all m o dels and serial num b ers, ce rtificat ed in any ca tegory.

Reas on : C o l o ur m a rki n g of el evat o r dr i v e i s not i n spe c t e d o r re- p ai nt ed du ri n g sai l p l a ne

o p e ration

. Th e elev ato r driv e is asymmetr ical and im proper i n stallation ca uses

significa nt elevator deflection changes

.

Effecti v e date : Jan u ary 28 , 19 99

C o mp lia n c e : Action m u st be done after AD receipt, not later tha n May 31, 1999 and either in

accorda n ce with LE T, a

. s., M a ndat o ry B u lletin No. L13/082a dated Nove m b er 27,

1998 whic h be com e s herewit h part of this AD a n d m a y be obtaine d from : LET, a.s.,

68 6 0 4 Ku n ovi ce, C ZEC H R E PUB L IC or i n acc or da nce wi t h AER O TE C H N I K C Z

s.r

. o

. Mand atory Bu lletin No

. SW 13 -04 5 a , SEH 13 -0 03 a, SL 13 -00 2 a d a ted

Decem ber 4, 1998, which bec o m e s herewith part of this AD and m a y be obtained

fro m : AEROTECHNIK CZ s.r.o

. , 6 8 6 04 Ku nov ice, CZECH REPUBLIC

Rema rks: - Where app lica b l e, th e requ iremen ts o f

th is AD mu st b e in teg r a t ed i n to t h e Ai rcra ft ́s Logb oo k(s)

. - Add r ess inqu iries con cern i n g th is AD t o : Civil Avia tio n Au tho r ity, Airwo r th in ess Divisio n

,

Ru zyn e Airpo r t, 16 0 08 Pra g u e 6

, Czech Repu b lic, tel: 42 0 2 324 086 , f

a x: 420 2 3 6411 2.



### Ing. Pavel MATOUŠEK

Director of Airw orthiness Division

CAA CZ

CA A- AD -4- 099 /98

1/ 1
AUTHORIZATION

        Know all by these presents, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and
appoints each of John M. Lowber, Bonnie J. Paskvan, and Alfred J. Walker,
signing singly, the undersigned's true and lawful attorney-in-fact to:

(1) execute for and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned's capacity
as an affiliate of General Communication, Inc. (the "Company"), Form 4, in
accordance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
rules thereunder;

(2) do and perform any and all acts for and on behalf of the undersigned which
may be necessary or desirable to complete and execute any such Form 4, complete
and execute any amendment or amendments thereto, and timely file such form with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any stock exchange or
similar authority; and

(3) take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the
foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit to,
in the best interest of, or legally required by, the undersigned, it being
understood that the documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on behalf of the
undersigned pursuant to this Power of Attorney shall be in such form and shall
contain such terms and conditions as such attorney-in-fact may approve in such
attorney-in-fact's discretion.

        The undersigned hereby grants to each such attorney-in-fact full power
and authority to do and perform any and every act and thing whatsoever
requisite, necessary, or proper to be done in the exercise of any of the rights
and powers herein granted, as fully to all intents and purposes as the
undersigned might or could do if personally present, with full power of
substitution or revocation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such
attorney-in-fact, or such attorney-in-fact's substitute or substitutes, shall
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this power of attorney and the
rights and powers herein granted. The undersigned acknowledges that the
foregoing attorneys-in-fact, in serving in such capacity at the request of the
undersigned, are not assuming, nor is the Company assuming, any of the
undersigned's responsibilities to comply with Section 16 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.

        This Power of Attorney shall remain in full force and effect until the
undersigned is no longer required to file Form 4, with respect to the
undersigned's holdings of and transactions in securities issued by the Company,
unless earlier revoked by the undersigned in a signed writing delivered to the
foregoing attorneys-in-fact.


                                   1
<PAGE>
        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Power of Attorney to
be executed as of this 21st day of January 2003.


                                 /s/
                                 ------------------------
                                 Signature


                                 Ronald A. Duncan
                                 ------------------------
                                 Print Name