alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3186 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3186

To amend the Department of Housing and Urban Development Act to exclude 
      amounts received as a military basic housing allowance from 
   consideration as income for purposes of eligibility for federally 
                 assisted low-income housing programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 30, 2005

 Mr. Ryun of Kansas (for himself, Mr. Al Green of Texas, Mr. Ney, Mr. 
Jones of North Carolina, Mr. Neugebauer, Mr. Reyes, Mr. Ortiz, and Mr. 
   Tiberi) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Department of Housing and Urban Development Act to exclude 
      amounts received as a military basic housing allowance from 
   consideration as income for purposes of eligibility for federally 
                 assisted low-income housing programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Build Houses for Our Military's 
Enlisted Servicemembers Act'' or the ``Build HOMES Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN AMOUNTS FROM INCOME FOR PURPOSES OF 
              ELIGIBILITY FOR FEDERALLY ASSISTED LOW-INCOME HOUSING 
              PROGRAMS.

    The Department of Housing and Urban Development Act is amended by 
inserting after section 12 (42 U.S.C. 3537a) the following new section:

``SEC. 13. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN AMOUNTS FROM INCOME.

    ``Notwithstanding any other provision of law, amounts received by a 
member of the Armed Forces under section 403 of title 37, United States 
Code, as a basic allowance for housing shall not be treated as income 
for purposes of determining, for purposes of any program of the 
Department of Housing and Urban Development or any other agency of the 
Federal Government for housing assistance (including any program for 
grants, loans, subsidies, advances, guarantees, credits, or other 
financial assistance), the eligibility of the member or the member's 
family, or a dependent of the member or such dependent's family, for--
            ``(1) assistance under such program; or
            ``(2) occupancy in any dwelling unit in any building or 
        project for which assistance under such program is provided.''.
                                 <all>
```
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAnalysis of the Bivariate Parameter Wind Differences Between Jimsphere and WindsondeAn analysis is presented for the bivariate parameter differences between the FPS-16 Radar/Jimsphere and the Meteorological Sounding System (MSS) Windsonde. The Jimsphere is used as the standard to measure the ascent wind during the Space Shuttle launches at Kennedy Space Center, Florida, and the Windsonde is the backup system. In addition, a discussion of the terrestrial environment (below 20 km) and a description of the Jimsphere and Windsonde wind sensors are given. Computation of the wind statistics from 64 paired Jimsphere and Windsonde balloon releases in support of 14 Space Shuttle launches shows a good agreement between the two wind sensors. From the analysis of buildup and back-off data for various scales of distance and the comparison of the cumulative percent frequency (CPF) versus wind speed change, it is shown that the wind speed change for various scales of distances for the Jimsphere and Windsonde compare favorably.Document ID19880001079Acquisition SourceHeadquartersDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsSusko, Michael*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1987Subject CategoryMeteorology And ClimatologyReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:4014NASA-TM-4014Accession Number88N10461Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19880001079.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 965.405 Actions affecting residents. ( a ) Before making any conversion to retail service, the PHA shall adopt revised payment schedules, providing appropriate allowances for the resident-supplied utilities resulting from the conversion.
( b ) Before implementing any modifications to utility services arrangements with the residents or charges with respect thereto, the PHA shall make the requisite changes in resident dwelling leases in accordance with 24 CFR part 966.
( c ) PHAs must work closely with resident organizations, to the extent practicable, in making plans for conversion of utility service to individual metering, explaining the national policy objectives of energy conservation, the changes in charges and rent structure that will result, and the goals of achieving an equitable structure that will be advantageous to residents who conserve energy.
( d ) A transition period of at least six months shall be provided in the case of initiation of checkmeters, during which residents will be advised of the charges but during which no surcharge will be made based on the readings. This trial period will afford residents ample notice of the effects the checkmetering system will have on their individual utility charges and also afford a test period for the adequacy of the utility allowances established.
( e ) During and after the transition period, PHAs shall advise and assist residents with high utility consumption on methods for reducing their usage. This advice and assistance may include counseling, installation of new energy conserving equipment or appliances, and corrective maintenance.
§ 960.103 Equal opportunity requirements and protection for victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking. ( a ) *Applicable requirements.* The PHA must administer its public housing program in accordance with all applicable equal opportunity requirements imposed by contract or federal law, including the authorities cited in § 5.105(a) of this title.
( b ) *PHA duty to affirmatively further fair housing.* The PHA must affirmatively further fair housing in the administration of its public housing program.
( c ) *Equal opportunity certification.* The PHA must submit signed equal opportunity certifications to HUD in accordance with § 903.7(o) of this title, including certification that the PHA will affirmatively further fair housing.
( d ) *Protection for victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking.* The PHA must apply the requirements in 24 CFR part 5, subpart L (Protection for Victims of Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, or Stalking).
[65 FR 16724, Mar. 29, 2000, as amended at 73 FR 72344, Nov. 28, 2008; 75 FR 66262, Oct. 27, 2010; 81 FR 80815, Nov. 16, 2016]
#### Gunnar Nillssen et al., Appellants-Respondents, v New York Hospital, Respondent-Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on November 21, 1977, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Fusco, J., at Trial Term, without costs and without disbursements. Concur—Lupiano, J. P., Birns, Evans and Sandler, JJ.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Ignis Petroleum Group, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Piazza,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
                Michael PiazzaMichael
                PiazzaChief
                Executive Officer




Date:  October
        11, 2005
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY**

**ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Firearms Training Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory A. Ton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Exhibit 32
                                                                    ----------

                             THINKING TOOLS, INC.
                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thinking Tools,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form  10-QSB  for the period  ending  September  30,  2003 (the
"Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company,  certifies,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

                  (1) The  Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
         Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
         operations of the Company.

Dated: February __, 2004

                                   By: Moshe Zarmi
                                       ------------------------
                                   Name:  Moshe Zarmi
                                   Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          and principal accounting officer
Crop Amount (kg)

Dried Cured Pork 3,240

Total Post Harvest 3,240

Strawberry - field 231,540

Total Pre-Plant 231,540

Total Use Limit 234,780

as % of baseline 0.9%

CRITICAL USES in DECISIONS XXVI/6
Pre-plant total use (as percent of total use) 98.6%

Total pre-plant 

CUA Allowances 138,592

Post-harvest total use (as percent of total use) 1.4%

Total postharvest 

CUA Allowances 1,939

Sum of above percentages 100.0% Total CUAs 140,531

As % of baseline 0.6%

CUA Allocation Calculations

PRE-PLANT vs. POST-HARVEST CUA ALLOCATIONS (kg) 2016
Company

Relative 

Share

Pre-Plant 

Allocation

Post Harvest 

Allocation

Chemtura Corp. 0.6077 84,222 1,179

Albermarle 0.2499 34,634 485

ICL-IP (Ameribrom) 0.1381 19,140 268

Trical 0.0043 596 8

Subtotal 1.0000 138,592 1,939

Total (kg) 140,531

Company Specific CUA Allowances

Proposed CUE Allowance Allocation 2016
### §12303. Exemption from numbering requirements

(a) When the Secretary is the authority issuing a number under this chapter, the Secretary may exempt a vessel or class of vessels from the numbering requirements of this chapter under conditions the Secretary may prescribe.

(b) When a State is the issuing authority, it may exempt from the numbering requirements of this chapter a vessel or class of vessels exempted under subsection (a) of this section or otherwise as permitted by the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 591.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 12303 | 46:1468 |

Section 12303 permits the Secretary and any State, when it is the issuing authority, to exempt vessels from the numbering requirements.
No. 01-15-00275-CR

In the 

Court of Appeals

for the 

First District of Texas

At Houston 



No. 1390115

In the 183rd District Court 

Of Harris County, Texas 



WALTER HARVEY BALLARD, JR. 

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS 

Appellee 



STATE’S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

IN WHICH TO FILE AN APPELLATE BRIEF 



TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS:

COMES NOW THE STATE OF TEXAS, in accordance with Rules 

10.5(b)(1) and 38.6(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and files this 

motion for an extension of time in which to file the State’s Brief in this cause, and, 

in support thereof, presents the following: 

ACCEPTED

01-15-00275-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

12/31/2015 9:54:53 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/31/2015 9:54:53 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
1. On February 26, 2015, appellant was convicted by a jury of possession of 

child pornography and sentenced to a term of 13 years in the Institutional 

Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. 

2. Appellant filed a timely written notice of appeal. 

3. The State’s Brief was due on December 30, 2015.

4. An extension of time in which to file the State’s Brief is requested until 

January 29, 2016. 

5. The following facts are relied upon to show good cause for the requested 

extension:

i. The undersigned attorney has been engaged in the preparation 

of the State’s Brief in Cause No. 14-15-00432-CR, Amos 

Sifuentes, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee, which was 

filed on December 11, 2015. 

ii. The undersigned attorney has been engaged in the preparation 

of the State’s Brief in Cause No. 01-15-00636-CR, Irvin Notias, 

Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee, which is due to be 

filed on January 13, 2016. 

iii. The undersigned attorney was on vacation from December 12, 

2015 through December 19, 2015. 

WHEREFORE, the State prays that this Court will grant an additional 

extension of time until January 29, 2016 in which to file the State’s Brief in this 

cause. 

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Heather A. Hudson

HEATHER A. HUDSON

Assistant District Attorney

Harris County, Texas
1201 Franklin, Suite 600

Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 755-5826

State Bar No. 24058991

hudson_heather@dao.hctx.net

curry_alan@dao.hctx.net

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing instrument has been submitted 

for service by e-filing to the following address:

Maverick Ray

1419 Franklin St.

Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 389-0940

maverickraylaw@gmail.com

/s/ Heather A. Hudson

HEATHER A. HUDSON

Assistant District Attorney

Harris County, Texas

1201 Franklin, Suite 600

Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 755-5826

State Bar No. 24058991

Date: December 31, 2015
### Geology of the Jolon and Williams Hill quadrangles, Monterey County, California

By: D.L. Durham

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1181Q

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (3576 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (5866 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 2**                            (5381 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 3**                            (247 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Argued and submitted February 10,

affirmed March 11, 1998

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Elizabeth A. Bergin, Claimant. LIBERTY NORTHWEST INSURANCE CORPORATION and Peace Health, *Petitioners, v.*Elizabeth A. BERGIN, *Respondent.*

(WCB 95-13542; CA A98109)

951 P2d 1107

E. Jay Perry argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Employers Defense Counsel.

Dale C. Johnson argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Malagon, Moore, Johnson & Jensen.

Before De Muniz, Presiding Judge, and Haselton and Linder, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *Rogers v. Cascade Pacific Ind.,*152 Or App 624, 955 P2d 307 (1998); *Barrett Business Services v. Hames,*130 Or App 190, 881 P2d 816, *rev den*320 Or 492 (1994).
#### § 81.97 Waiver of regulations.

The Secretary reserves the right in the Secretary's discretion, to waive any provision(s) of these regulations in any case or class of cases for the convenience of a GSE, the United States, or in order to relieve any person(s) of unnecessary hardship, if such action is not inconsistent with law, does not adversely affect any substantial existing rights, and the Secretary is satisfied that such action will not subject a GSE or the United States to any substantial expense or liability.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**SENECA GAMING CORPORATION**

**CERTIFICATION OF CORPORATE OFFICERS**

 

(Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Seneca Gaming Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission, we, John Pasqualoni, InterimPresident and Chief Executive Officer, and Joseph A. D’Amato, Senior VicePresident, Finance and Administration, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.             The Annual Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended,; and

 

2.             The information contained in the AnnualReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operation of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented inthe Form 10-K.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.

 

 
| May 9, 2005                                                                 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                             |
| /s/ John Pasqualoni                                                              |   |
| John  Pasqualoni                                                                 |
| Interim  President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)     |
|                                                                             |
|                                                                             |
| /s/ Joseph A. D’Amato                                                       |   |
| Joseph A. D’Amato                                                           |
| Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration (Principal  Financial Officer) |

 

The forgoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Kpursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not beingfiled as part of the Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
### §507. Violation of Great Lakes Agreement

(a) Any vessel of the United States that is navigated in violation of the provisions of the Great Lakes Agreement or the rules and regulations of the Commission made in pursuance thereof and any vessel of a foreign country that is so navigated on waters under the jurisdiction of the United States shall forfeit to the United States the sum of $500 recoverable by way of suit or libel. Each day during which such navigation occurs shall constitute a separate offense.

(b) Every willful failure on the part of the master of a vessel of the United States to enforce or to comply with the provisions of the Great Lakes Agreement or the rules and regulations of the Commission made in pursuance thereof shall cause him to forfeit to the United States the sum of $100.

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title V, §506, formerly §507, as added Aug. 13, 1954, ch. 735, §3, 68 Stat. 729; renumbered §506, Pub. L. 96–507, §1, Dec. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 2747.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 506 of act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, was classified to section 506 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 96–507.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section 6 of act Aug. 13, 1954, provided that: "This Act [enacting this section and amending sections 153, 154, and 504 of this title] shall take effect on November 13, 1954."