alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2146. Oversight Board duties related to restructuring

#### (a) Requirements for restructuring certification

The Oversight Board, prior to issuing a restructuring certification regarding an entity (as such term is defined in section 101 of title 11), shall determine, in its sole discretion, that—

(1) the entity has made good-faith efforts to reach a consensual restructuring with creditors;

(2) the entity has—

(A) adopted procedures necessary to deliver timely audited financial statements; and

(B) made public draft financial statements and other information sufficient for any interested person to make an informed decision with respect to a possible restructuring;

(3) the entity is either a covered territory that has adopted a Fiscal Plan certified by the Oversight Board, a covered territorial instrumentality that is subject to a Territory Fiscal Plan certified by the Oversight Board, or a covered territorial instrumentality that has adopted an Instrumentality Fiscal Plan certified by the Oversight Board; and

(4)(A) no order approving a Qualifying Modification under section 2231 of this title has been entered with respect to such entity; or

(B) if an order approving a Qualifying Modification has been entered with respect to such entity, the entity is unable to make its debt payments notwithstanding the approved Qualifying Modification, in which case, all claims affected by the Qualifying Modification shall be subject to a subchapter III case.

#### (b) Issuance of restructuring certification

The issuance of a restructuring certification under this section requires a vote of no fewer than 5 members of the Oversight Board in the affirmative, which shall satisfy the requirement set forth in section 2162(2) of this title.

(Pub. L. 114–187, title II, §206, June 30, 2016, 130 Stat. 574.)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1570

MARK A. LEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CUSHMAN, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-2854-1-6BC) Submitted: October 31, 1997 Decided: November 17, 1997 Before HALL and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark A. Lee, Appellant Pro Se. George R. Hall, Timothy Eugene Moses, HULL, TOWILL, NORMAN & BARRETT, Augusta, Georgia, For Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellee in this products liability action. Appellant's case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended thatsummary judgment be granted in favor of Appellee, and advised Appellant that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to object to the magistrate judge's recommendation.The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED3
#### Rudolph Lederer, appellee, v. Albert Sabath and Morris Sabath, appellants.

Gen. No. 28,394.

Judgment on note for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Samuel H. Trude, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed October 2, 1923.

Sabath & Sabath, for appellants. Frederick W. Moore, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JCC HOLDING
COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONDENSED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AS OF JUNE 30, 1999 AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE
30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           9,537
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,425
<PP&E>                                         311,887
<DEPRECIATION>                                     357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 425,496
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,753
<BONDS>                                        276,806
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                      94,936
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   425,496
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    10
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,696
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,451)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,451)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,451)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.94


</TABLE>
February24 , 201 0 •''•'' ' ^'~;^;:--:'|^f^'"^''^^'0 ^ Th e Honorabl e Ra

yLaHoo d Secretary' Unite d State s Departmen t o fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerseyAvenue , S E Washington , D.C
. 

### 2059 0 Subject : Haned a Combinatio n Service s Allocatio n Proceedin g DOT-OST-2010-001 8 Dea rSecretaryLaHood : A s a dedicate d trave l partne ro fAmerica n Airlines , I a m writin g i n suppor to fAmerican' s pplicatio n t o provid e ne wservic e fro m Los Angele s Internationa l Airpor tt o Toky o Internationa l Airpor t a t Haneda
. a I recogniz e an d applau d yo u an d th e Obam a administratio n fo ryou rsucces s las t Decembe ri n reachin g a landmar k Ope n Skie s agreemen twit h Japan , whic h open s u p Haned a t o servic e byU.S
. airlines
. I encourag e you rselectio n o fAmerica n Airline s t o provid e nonsto p servic e fro m Lo s Anpele s t o Haned a i n orde rt o provid e a n essentia l connectio n betwee n tw o o fth e world' s mos t dynami ccommercia l centers
. Recen t events , includin g th e successfu l preservatio n o fJapa n Airlines ' oneworl d Allianc e membership , hav e underscore d American' s stron g commitmen tt o th e trans-Pacifi c market ; America n i s likewis e cQTnra,itte d t o LosAngele s - ra worl d cente t o fbusiness , • trade , entertainmen t an d technolog y- an d has provide d th e cit ywit h unsurpasse d ai r servic e fo rman ydecades
. Los Angeles , a

s wel l a s th e entir e Souther n Californi a regio n wil l gai n a significan t economi cbenefi t fro m thes e propose d ne wflights , a s wil l American' s customer s an d employees
. However , w e nee d you rhel p t o mak e th e LAX/Haned a connectio n a reality
. Therefore , I strongl yyrg e yo u t o ^ayiye s t o America n Airline s an d itS'reques tfor.slot s t o fl yfrom.Lo s Angele s t o Haneda ! v-k.-j'- vi. / ; . ^. ^

'• , ; . i

^ - ; . ; ••,•-''•. - •-7.- ' ^ i
. . . •••- ^ j ii'•-:?.• : .:.. •-: ' -'..c' ; •.. . ^. , Sincerely , 

### xx^x '
**Exhibit 32.2**     I, Peter E. Jokiel, Chief Financial Officer of Specialty Underwriters’ Alliance, Inc. (the“Company”), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify asfollows:     The annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and     The information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certification this 4th day of March 2008.         By:                                                                  /s/ Peter E. Jokiel    Name:  Peter E. Jokiel    Title:  Executive VicePresident and ChiefFinancial Officer        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SpecialtyUnderwriters’ Alliance, Inc. and will be retained by Specialty Underwriters’ Alliance, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
O rder filed December 1 1 , 201 4



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

______ _ ____


### No. 11

- 1 4

- 00 1 29

- CR

_____ _

_____


### LANNY MARVIN BUSH , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 42nd District Court Coleman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2 602

O R D E R

A ppellant’s court

- appointed attorney o f record , Perry B. Sims, has filed in

this court a motion to withdraw as counsel for Appellant

. C ounsel state s that h e “has accepted an offer to become an Assistant District Attorney for the 452nd
Judicial District” and that he must, therefore, withdraw from the practice of

criminal defense. Counsel’s motion complies with T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 6.5. The
motion is granted , and the appeal is abated

.2 The trial co urt is directed to appoint new counsel to represent A ppellant on appeal , and the trial court clerk is instructed to file in this court on or before

December 31, 2014, a supplemental clerk’s record evidencing such appointment

. The appeal will be reinstated when the supplemental clerk’s record is filed in this

court.

PER CURIAM

December 11, 2014
Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).
Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
#### In the Matter of John F. O’Donnell, an Attorney.

Motion for reinstatement to the Bar granted. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente and Stevens, JJ.
#### Samuel A. Stornelli, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 32162.)

— Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Certain findings of fact reversed and new findings made. Memorandum: While we affirm the judgment of the Court of Claims, *1089we do so upon grounds different from those given by that court. In our opinion, there was no negligence on the part of the State. The intersection was not of such a character as to require either the erection of a warning sign or special pavement markings. In view of our decision on the issue of negligence, we find it unnecessary to reach the question of whether the claimant was chargeable with contributory negligence. (Appeal from judgment of Court of Claims dismissing claimant’s claim.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, MeClusky and Henry, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 238 (Thursday, December 10, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 79535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27081]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and First-Class Package Service 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 10, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 4, 2020, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & First-Class Package Service Contract 180 
to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2021-40, CP2021-41.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2020-27081 Filed 12-9-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Firearms Training Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John A. Morelli, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/S/ John A. MorelliJohn A. MorelliChief Financial OfficerOctober 31, 2003
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1826 ROBERT S. REYNOLDS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARK WARNER, Honorable, Governor of Commonwealth of Virginia, Defendant - Appellee, and MEDICAL COLLEGE OF VIRGINIA, Auxiliary of Virginia Commonwealth University Health System; RETREAT HOSPITAL, INCORPORATED, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-05-349) Submitted: February 23, 2006 Decided: February 28, 2006 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert S. Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Michael Hall, Judith Williams Jagdmann, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Robert S. Reynolds appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Reynolds’ motion for an en banc hearing and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Reynolds v. Warner , No. CA-05-349 (E.D. Va. June 23, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 35.1140 Insurance coverage.

For the requirements concerning the obligation of a PHA to obtain reasonable insurance coverage with respect to the hazards associated with evaluation and hazard reduction activities, see § 965.215 of this title.
----

|   | By:    | Shanghai Stock Exchange       |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------|
|   |   | Information Network Co., Ltd. |

----

----

| 2.2  | Designated bank and account by Party A: |
|-----------|-----------------------------------------|

| Party A: Shanghai Stock Exchange Information | Party B: Beijing Fuhua Innovation Network |
|----------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
| Co., Ltd.                               | Technology Development Co., Ltd.          |
|                                         |                                      |
| (Signature or Seal) /s/ Rong Zihe            | (Signature or Seal) /s/                   |
|                                         |                                      |
| [COMPANY SEAL]                               | [COMPANY SEAL]                            |
|                                         |                                      |
| Date of Execution: December 25, 2012         | Date of Execution:                        |
|                                         |                                      |
|                                         |                                      |

----

----

| Product/ Service Type | Product/Service Name              | Description                                                      | Quantity | Select |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|--------|
| Satellite System      | Shanghai Broadband Satellite VSAT | Subscribe by Party B from Shanghai Stock Communication Co., Ltd. | One Set  | Yes    |
| Ground System         | INTERNET Transmission             | Provided by Party A, ***                                         | One Set  | Yes    |
|                  | Dedicated Line Transmission       | Provided by Party A, ***                                         | One Set  | No     |
| Notes:                |                              | None                                                             |     |   |

| Party A: Shanghai Stock Exchange Information | Party B: Beijing Fuhua Innovation Network |
|----------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
| Co., Ltd.                               | Technology Development Co., Ltd.          |
|                                         |                                      |
| (Signature or Seal) /s/ Rong Zihe            | (Signature or Seal) /s/                   |
|                                         |                                      |
| [COMPANY SEAL]                               | [COMPANY SEAL]                            |
|                                         |                                      |
| Date of Execution: December 25, 2012         | Date of Execution:                        |
|                                         |                                      |
|                                         |                                      |
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IMPSAT Fiber Networks on Form 10-Q
for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Héctor Alonso, Chief
Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.

Date: November 14, 2003

/s/ Héctor AlonsoHéctor AlonsoChief Financial Officer
### §53110. Regulations

The Secretary and the Secretary of Defense may each prescribe rules as necessary to carry out their respective responsibilities under this chapter.

(Added Pub. L. 108–136, div. C, title XXXV, §3531(a), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1817.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Interim Rules

Pub. L. 108–136, div. C, title XXXV, §3533, Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1818, provided that: "The Secretary of Transportation and the Secretary of Defense may each prescribe interim rules necessary to carry out their respective responsibilities under this subtitle [subtitle C (§§3531–3537) of title XXXV of div. C of Pub. L. 108–136, enacting this chapter, amending former section 12102 of this title and sections 808 and 1162 of the former Appendix to this title, repealing sections 1187 to 1187e and 1222 of the former Appendix to this title, enacting provisions set out as a note under section 53101 of this title, and amending provisions set out as a note under section 1187 of the former Appendix to this title] and the amendments made by this subtitle. For this purpose, the Secretaries are excepted from compliance with the notice and comment requirements of section 553 of title 5, United States Code. All interim rules prescribed under the authority of this section that are not earlier superseded by final rules shall expire no later than 270 days after the effective date of this subtitle [see Effective Date note set out under section 53101 of this title]."
Exhibit 99.2

                         Independent Accountant's Report


      Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc. (as Depositor)
      One Wachovia Center
      301 South College Street, DC-7
      Charlotte, NC 28288

      U.S. Bank Trust National Association (as Trustee)
      Corporate Trust Department
      100 Wall Street
      New York, NY 10005


      Re:   STRATS Trust For J.P.Morgan Chase & Co. Securities, Series 2004-9
            (the "Trust")
            -----------------------------------------------------------------

      Ladies and Gentlemen:

      We have examined assertions of Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc.
      (the "Depositor") and U.S. Bank National Association, (the "Trustee" and
      Together with the Depositor, the "Management") that the Depositor and the
      Trustee have complied, in all material respects, with the provisions of
      the Base Trust Agreement dated as of September 26, 2003, as supplemented
      by a series supplement dated as of July 15, 2004 (together, the "Trust
      Agreement"), in respect of the STRATS Trust For J.P.Morgan Chase & Co.
      Securities, Series 2004-9 (the "Trust"), during the period covered by the
      annual report on Form 10-K filed by the Depositor on behalf of the Trust
      for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Annual Report"). Management is
      responsible for compliance with the Trust Agreement. Our responsibility is
      to express an opinion on Management's assertions based on our examination.

      Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards
      established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
      accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the
      Depositor's and the Trustee's compliance with the Trust Agreement and
      performing such other procedures as considered necessary in the
      circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
      for our opinion.

      In our opinion, the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all
      material respects, with the Trust Agreement during the period covered by
      the Annual Report and Management's assertions with respect to such
      compliance are fairly stated, in all material respects, for the year ended
      December 31, 2007.


      /s/ Aston Bell, CPA

      New York, New York
      March 14, 2008