alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

**INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S CONSENT**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inthe Registration Statement of SendTec, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form S-8 (File No. 333-137883) of our report dated March 16, 2007, with respect to our audits of the consolidated financial statements of SendTec, Inc. as ofDecember 31, 2006 and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2006, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of SendTec, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

Our report on the consolidated financial statements includes the following explanatory paragraph: As more fully described in Note 2 to the consolidated financialstatements, the Company’s Senior Secured Convertible Debentures in the principal amount of $34,580,000, as of December 31, 2006, are due on March 31, 2008. The Company currently lacks sufficient capital resources to repay thisobligation upon its maturity. Accordingly, the Company must either restructure this obligation or secure alternative financing to repay this obligation on March 31, 2008. 

/S/ MARCUM & KLIEGMANLLP

New York, New York

March 27, 2007
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1642** 
In re: MARK JACOB JONES, SR., a/k/a Mark J. Jones, Sr. , Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
. ( 2:14

- cr - 00132

- RGD

- LRL

- 2 ; 2:16

- cv - 00106

- RGD

- LRL )

Submitted : October 18, 2016 Decided: October 20, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion
.
Mark Jacob Jones, Sr. , Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Mark Jacob Jones, Sr., has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order from this court directing the district court to rule on his motion for p reparation of a transcript at government expense, 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (2012). We conclude that Jones is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui , 333 F.3d 509, 516

- 17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). Jones has failed to make such a showing. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny Jones’ petition for mandamus. We dispense with oral argument beca use the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, David Lichtenstein, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m); and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ David Lichtenstein


David Lichtenstein


Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)





Date : March 31, 2011
§ 983.205 Term of HAP contract. ( a ) *Initial term.* The PHA may enter into a HAP contract with an owner for an initial term of up to 20 years for each contract unit. The length of the term of the HAP contract for any contract unit may not be less than one year, nor more than 20 years.
( b ) *Extension of term.* The PHA and owner may agree at any time before expiration of the HAP contract to execute one or more extensions of the HAP contract term. The following conditions apply: ( 1 ) Each extension executed must have a term that does not exceed 20 years;
( 2 ) At no time may the total remaining term of the HAP contract, with extensions, exceed 40 years;
( 3 ) Before agreeing to an extension, the PHA must determine that the extension is appropriate to continue providing affordable housing for low-income families or to expand housing opportunities; and
( 4 ) Each extension must be on the form and subject to the conditions prescribed by HUD at the time of the extension.
[89 FR 38325, May 7, 2024]
#### In the Matter of Commissioner of Jurors of the County of Erie.

Order entered permitting destruction of papers.
### §3614. Roles and responsibilities of the Office of Management and Budget

The Director shall—

(1) in consultation with the Administrator and the Secretary, issue guidance that—

(A) specifies the categories or characteristics of cloud computing products and services that are within the scope of FedRAMP;

(B) includes requirements for agencies to obtain a FedRAMP authorization when operating a cloud computing product or service described in subparagraph (A) as a Federal information system; and

(C) encompasses, to the greatest extent practicable, all necessary and appropriate cloud computing products and services;

(2) issue guidance describing additional responsibilities of FedRAMP and the FedRAMP Board to accelerate the adoption of secure cloud computing products and services by the Federal Government;

(3) in consultation with the Administrator, establish a process to periodically review FedRAMP authorization packages to support the secure authorization and reuse of secure cloud products and services;

(4) oversee the effectiveness of FedRAMP and the FedRAMP Board, including the compliance by the FedRAMP Board with the duties described in section 3610(d); and

(5) to the greatest extent practicable, encourage and promote consistency of the assessment, authorization, adoption, and use of secure cloud computing products and services within and across agencies.

(Added Pub. L. 117–263, div. E, title LIX, §5921(b), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3454.)

#### Repeal of Section

For repeal of section by section 5921(d)(1) of Pub. L. 117–263, see Effective Date of Repeal note below.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 117–263, div. E, title LIX, §5921(d)(1), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3458, provided that the repeal of this section is effective on the date that is 5 years after Dec. 23, 2022.

#### Construction

For rule of construction regarding section 5921 of Pub. L. 117–263, see section 5921(e) of Pub. L. 117–263, set out as a note under section 3607 of this title.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 22, 2019

a1119

Order 

Clerk

November 22, 2019

159691

CITY OF DEARBORN, 

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant- Appellee,

v SC: 159691

COA: 339704

Wayne CC: 15-012788-CH

BANK OF AMERICA,

Defendant/Cross-Defendant- Appellee,

and

WEST DEARBORN PARTNERS LLC,

Defendant/Counterplaintiff/ 

Cross-Plaintiff-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 12, 2019 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on the application. MCR 7.305(H)(1). 

The appellant shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of this 

order addressing: (1) whether the federal bankruptcy court’s October 5, 2011 order 

extinguished the appellant’s interest in Parcel C; (2) whether Bank of America’s filing of 

a discharge of the mortgage in 2015 impacted any interest the appellant had in Parcel C at 

that time; and (3) whether the equitable arguments raised by the appellant require the 

reversal of the Court of Appeals opinion. In addition to the brief, the appellant shall 

electronically file an appendix conforming to MCR 7.312(D)(2). In the brief, citations to 

the record must provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1).

Appellee City of Dearborn shall file a supplemental brief within 21 days of being served 

with the appellant’s brief. The appellee shall also electronically file an appendix, or in 

the alternative, stipulate to the use of the appendix filed by the appellant. A reply, if any, 

must be filed by the appellant within 14 days of being served with the appellee’s brief. 

The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.
(March 23, 1978)

#### Bruce C. Mace, Respondent, v Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., Appellant. Joanne Mace, Respondent, v Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., Appellant.

Appeal from (1) judgments of the Supreme Court in favor of plaintiffs, entered August 19, 1975 in Madison County, upon verdicts rendered at a Trial Term and (2) an order of the same court, entered August 14, 1975, which denied defendant’s motions to dismiss the complaints at the close of the evidence and for judgment notwithstanding the verdicts. On a prior appeal to this court, judgments in favor of plaintiffs were reversed, on the law, and the complaints were dismissed upon the grounds that the negligence of the defendant was not the proximate cause of the injuries alleged, nor was the result foreseeable (55 AD2d 432). On further appeal to the Court of Appeals, this determination was itself reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions of this court and the case was remitted to us for a review of the facts (43 NY2d 814; see CPLR 5613). It is abundantly clear that all appropriate questions of fact were considered by the jury and its resolution of those issues in the trial court in favor of plaintiffs should not be disturbed. Upon review of the facts, the judgments are affirmed. Judgments and order affirmed, with costs. Kane, J. P., Staley, Jr., Main, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
§ 1228.105 Funding of cooperative agreements. ( a ) ( 1 ) The Department may, under the terms of the cooperative agreement, reimburse the State or Indian tribe up to 100 percent of the costs of eligible activities. Eligible activities will be agreed upon annually upon the submission and approval of a workplan and funding requirement.
( 2 ) A cooperative agreement may be entered into with a State or Indian tribe, upon request, without a requirement for reimbursement of costs by the Department.
( b ) All cooperative agreements under this part are subject to annual funding and the availability of appropriations specifically designated for the purpose of this part.
( c ) The State or Indian tribe shall submit a voucher for reimbursement of eligible costs incurred within 30 days of the end of each calendar quarter. The State or Indian tribe must provide the Department a summary of costs incurred, for which the State or Indian tribe is seeking reimbursement, with the voucher.
[49 FR 37348, Sept. 21, 1984, as amended at 56 FR 10512, Mar. 13, 1991]
<TABLE>
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1
                   TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<CAPTION>
LOSS PER SHARE                                  Three Months Ended
                                                     March 31,
                                             1999                1998
                                           ----------          ----------

<S>                                      <C>                 <C>
Net loss                                 $ (3,484,000)       $ (4,018,000)

Basic EPS - Weighted Average Shares
     Outstanding                           41,110,000          35,322,000
Less: Shares in Escrow                     (4,150,000)         (4,150,000)
                                           ----------          ----------
Basic EPS - Weighted Average Shares
     Outstanding Adjusted                  36,960,000          31,172,000
                                           ==========          ==========

Basic Loss per Share                     $      (0.09)        $     (0.13)
                                           ==========          ==========

Basic EPS - Weighted Average Shares
     Outstanding Adjusted                  36,960,000          31,172,000
                                           ==========          ==========

Effect of Diluted Securities:
     Warrants and Stock Options (1)                -                    -
                                           ----------          ----------

Diluted EPS - Weighted Average Shares
     Oustanding                            36,960,000          31,172,000
                                           ==========          ==========

Diluted Loss per Share                   $      (0.09)        $     (0.13)
                                           ==========          ==========

<FN>
(1)        The Company's outstanding stock options and warrants have an
           atidilutive effect on net loss per share. As a result such amounts
           have been excluded from the computations of diluted loss per share.
</FN>
</TABLE>


                                    Page 22
### §7102. Citizenship

Licenses and certificates of registry for individuals on documented vessels may be issued only to citizens of the United States.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 540.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 7102 | 46:24246:1132(a) |

46:1132(a)

Section 7102 requires that any individual issued a license or certificate of registry allowing the individual to be engaged on a documented vessel must be a U.S. citizen.
(September 30, 1960)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel Lento, Appellant.

Upon stipulation of the parties, order of this court dated September 12, 1960, dismissing the appeal, vacated. Upon the court’s own motion, the appellant’s time is enlarged to November 7, 1960, for which day the appeal is ordered to be placed on the calendar. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 318

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and feasibility of designating Castle Nugent Farms located on St. Croix, Virgin 

Islands, as a unit of the National Park System, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2005

Mrs. CHRISTENSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and feasibility of designating Castle Nugent 

Farms located on St. Croix, Virgin Islands, as a unit 

of the National Park System, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE STUDY REGARDING 

4 CASTLE NUGENT FARMS. 

5 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 

6 (1) Castle Nugent Farms, located on the south7 eastern shore of St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands, is 

8 the largest parcel of privately-held land in the Virgin 
2

•HR 318 IH 

1 Islands and has been an operating cattle ranch for 

2 50 years. 

3 (2) This land has the largest and healthiest 

4 fringing coral reef anywhere in the Virgin Islands. 

5 (3) It consists of Caribbean dry forest and 

6 pasturelands with considerable cultural resources in7 cluding both pre-Columbian and post-European set8 tlement. 

9 (4) Castle Nugent Farms contains a large his10 toric 17th century Danish estate house that sits on 

11 over 4 miles of pristine Caribbean oceanfront prop12 erty. 

13 (5) In addition to being an area for turtle nest14 ing and night heron nesting, it is the home for the 

15 Senepol cattle breed, a unique breed of cattle that 

16 was developed on St. Croix in the early 1900’s to 

17 adapt to the island’s climate. 

18 (b) STUDY.—The Secretary of the Interior shall carry 

19 out a study regarding the suitability and feasibility of des20 ignating Castle Nugent Farms as a unit of the National 

21 Park System. 

22 (c) STUDY PROCESS AND COMPLETION.—Section 

23 8(c) of Public Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5(c)) shall 
3

•HR 318 IH 

1 apply to the conduct and completion of the study required 

2 by this section.

Æ
AUTHORIZATION

        Know all by these presents, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and
appoints each of John M. Lowber, Bonnie J. Paskvan, and Alfred J. Walker,
signing singly, the undersigned's true and lawful attorney-in-fact to:

(1) execute for and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned's capacity
as an affiliate of General Communication, Inc. (the "Company"), Form 4, in
accordance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
rules thereunder;

(2) do and perform any and all acts for and on behalf of the undersigned which
may be necessary or desirable to complete and execute any such Form 4, complete
and execute any amendment or amendments thereto, and timely file such form with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any stock exchange or
similar authority; and

(3) take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the
foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit to,
in the best interest of, or legally required by, the undersigned, it being
understood that the documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on behalf of the
undersigned pursuant to this Power of Attorney shall be in such form and shall
contain such terms and conditions as such attorney-in-fact may approve in such
attorney-in-fact's discretion.

        The undersigned hereby grants to each such attorney-in-fact full power
and authority to do and perform any and every act and thing whatsoever
requisite, necessary, or proper to be done in the exercise of any of the rights
and powers herein granted, as fully to all intents and purposes as the
undersigned might or could do if personally present, with full power of
substitution or revocation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such
attorney-in-fact, or such attorney-in-fact's substitute or substitutes, shall
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this power of attorney and the
rights and powers herein granted. The undersigned acknowledges that the
foregoing attorneys-in-fact, in serving in such capacity at the request of the
undersigned, are not assuming, nor is the Company assuming, any of the
undersigned's responsibilities to comply with Section 16 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.

        This Power of Attorney shall remain in full force and effect until the
undersigned is no longer required to file Form 4, with respect to the
undersigned's holdings of and transactions in securities issued by the Company,
unless earlier revoked by the undersigned in a signed writing delivered to the
foregoing attorneys-in-fact.


                                   1
<PAGE>
        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Power of Attorney to
be executed as of this 28th day of January 2003.


                                 /s/
                                 ------------------------
                                 Signature


                                 William C. Behnke
                                 ------------------------
                                 Print Name
§ 1243.200 How do I demonstrate financial solvency? ( a ) To demonstrate financial solvency under this part, you must submit an audited consolidated balance sheet, and, if requested by the ONRR bond-approving officer, up to 3 years of tax returns to the ONRR, Debt Collection Section using: ( 1 ) The U.S. Postal Service or private delivery at Office of Natural Resources Revenue, Office of Enforcement, P.O. Box 25165, MS 642000B, Denver, Colorado 80225-0165; or
( 2 ) Courier or overnight delivery at Office of Natural Resources Revenue, MS 642000B, Room A322, Bldg 85, DFC, Denver, Colorado 80225-0165.
( b ) You must submit an audited consolidated balance sheet annually, and, if requested, additional annual tax returns on the date ONRR first determined that you demonstrated financial solvency as long as you have active appeals, or whenever ONRR requests.
( c ) If you demonstrate financial solvency in the current calendar year, you are not required to redemonstrate financial solvency for new appeals of orders during that calendar year unless you file for protection under any provision of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Title 11 of the United States Code), or ONRR notifies you that you must redemonstrate financial solvency.
[64 FR 26254, May 13, 1999, as amended at 76 FR 76617, Dec. 8, 2011; 87 FR 21746, Apr. 13, 2022]
#### MARTIN, Appellant, v. UNIVERSAL TRUST CO., Respondent. UNIVERSAL TRUST CO., Respondent, v. MARTIN et al., Appellants.

N (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 9, 1903.)

Actions by Sarah Martin against the Universal Trust Company, and by the Universal Trust Company against Sarah Blartin and others.

No opinion. ..Order resettled so as to provide that the costs and disbursements awarded to the appellant abide the final result of the action.
### §1574d. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–357, title III, §308(g), Oct. 19, 1982, 96 Stat. 1710

Section, Pub. L. 94–392, §4, Aug. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 1195, related to grants to government of Virgin Islands for operation of such government and limitation on amount of such grants.
### §9849. Nondiscrimination provisions

#### (a) Discrimination based on race, creed, color, etc., as basis for denial of financial assistance

The Secretary shall not provide financial assistance for any program, project, or activity under this subchapter unless the grant or contract with respect thereto specifically provides that no person with responsibilities in the operation thereof will discriminate with respect to any such program, project, or activity because of race, creed, color, national origin, sex, political affiliation, or beliefs.

#### (b) Sex discrimination; enforcement provisions applicable

No person in the United States shall on the ground of sex be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, be subjected to discrimination under, or be denied employment in connection with any program or activity receiving assistance under this subchapter. The Secretary shall enforce the provisions of the preceding sentence in accordance with section 2000d–1 of this title. Section 2000d–2 of this title shall apply with respect to any action taken by the Secretary to enforce such sentence. This section shall not be construed as affecting any other legal remedy that a person may have if such person is excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, subjected to discrimination under, or denied employment in connection with, any program, project, or activity receiving assistance under this subchapter.

#### (c) Discrimination based on handicapping condition as basis for denial of financial assistance

The Secretary shall not provide financial assistance for any program, project, or activity under this subchapter unless the grant or contract relating to the financial assistance specifically provides that no person with responsibilities in the operation of the program, project, or activity will discriminate against any individual because of a handicapping condition in violation of section 794 of title 29.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §654, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 507.)