alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3315. Disclosure of defects and protection of informants

(a) Each individual licensed under part E of this subtitle shall assist in the inspection or examination under this part of the vessel on which the individual is serving, and shall point out defects and imperfections known to the individual in matters subject to regulations and inspection. The individual also shall make known to officials designated to enforce this part, at the earliest opportunity, any marine casualty producing serious injury to the vessel, its equipment, or individuals on the vessel.

(b) An official may not disclose the name of an individual providing information under this section, or the source of the information, to a person except a person authorized by the Secretary. An official violating this subsection is liable to disciplinary action under applicable law.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 516.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 3315 | 46:234 |

Section 3315 requires an individual holding a license issued by the Coast Guard to assist inspection authorities and to make defects and imperfections known to those authorities. Anyone licensed also has a duty to report any marine casualty producing serious injury to the vessel, its equipment, or individuals on board the vessel. These licensed individuals who have this statutorily imposed duty to disclose are also protected by prohibiting any government official from disclosing the identity or source of the information except as authorized by the Secretary.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Apr. 15, 1984, see section 2(g)(1) of Pub. L. 98–89, set out as a note under section 3101 of this title.

#### Anonymous Safety Alert System

Pub. L. 115–265, title II, §217, Oct. 11, 2018, 132 Stat. 3752, provided that:

"(a) Pilot Program.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 11, 2018], the Commandant [of the Coast Guard] shall establish an anonymous safety alert pilot program.

"(b) Requirements.—The pilot program established under subsection (a) shall provide an anonymous reporting mechanism to allow crew members to communicate urgent and dire safety concerns directly and in a timely manner with the Coast Guard."
Price Waterhouse LLP
February 19, 1997

To the Board of Directors of
Berwyn Income Fund, Inc.

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of
Berwyn Income Fund, Inc. (the "Fund") for the year ended December 31,
1996, we considered its internal control structure, including
procedures for safeguarding securities, in order to determine our
auditing procedures for the purposes of expressing our opinion on the
financial statements and to comply with the requirements of Form NSAR,
and not to provide assurance on the internal control structure.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining an internal control structure.  In fulfilling this
responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are required to
assess the expected benefits and related costs of internal control
structure policies and procedures.  Two of the objectives of an
internal control structure are to provide management with reasonable,
but not absolute, assurance that assets are appropriately safeguarded
against loss from unauthorized use or disposition and that
transactions are executed in accordance with management's
authorization and recorded properly to permit preparation of financial
statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control structure,
errors or irregularities may occur and may not be detected.  Also,
projection of any evaluation of the structure to future periods is
subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes
in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control structure would not
necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control structure
that might be material weaknesses under standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material
weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of the
specific internal control structure elements does not reduce to a
relatively low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts
that would be material in relation to the financial statements being
audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by
employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions.
However, we noted no matters involving the internal control structure,
including procedures for safeguarding securities, that we consider to
be material weaknesses as defined above as of December 31, 1996.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management and the Securities and Exchange Commission.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND
SUCH IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           11640
<SECURITIES>                                     61590
<RECEIVABLES>                                    86400<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     498910
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                730460
<PP&E>                                          343300<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1120820
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           261700
<BONDS>                                         200000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      462310
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1120820
<SALES>                                         479260
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                479260
<CGS>                                           358190
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   358190
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2850
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                7850
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  19490
<INCOME-TAX>                                      5860
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              13630
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     13630
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>RECEIVABLES AND PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT ARE PRESENTED NET OF ALLOWANCES FOR
DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 982
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999, and at 89 FR 38293, May 7, 2024.

§ 982.316 Live-in aide. ( a ) A family that consists of one or more elderly, near-elderly or disabled persons may request that the PHA approve a live-in aide to reside in the unit and provide necessary supportive services for a family member who is a person with disabilities. The PHA must approve a live-in aide if needed as a reasonable accommodation in accordance with 24 CFR part 8 to make the program accessible to and usable by the family member with a disability. (See § 982.402(b)(6) concerning effect of live-in aide on family unit size.)
( b ) At any time, the PHA may refuse to approve a particular person as a live-in aide, or may withdraw such approval, if: ( 1 ) The person commits fraud, bribery or any other corrupt or criminal act in connection with any federal housing program;
( 2 ) The person commits drug-related criminal activity or violent criminal activity; or
( 3 ) The person currently owes rent or other amounts to the PHA or to another PHA in connection with Section 8 or public housing assistance under the 1937 Act.
[63 FR 23860, Apr. 30, 1998; 63 FR 31625, June 10, 1998]
### §1689. Plan for use of grant to Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands Economic Development Loan Fund; loans; terms

The grant authorized by section 1688 of this title shall be made only after the government of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands has submitted to the Secretary of the Interior a plan for the use of the grant, and the plan has been approved by the Secretary. The plan shall provide among other things for a revolving fund to make loans or to guarantee loans to private enterprise. The term of any loan made pursuant to the plan shall not exceed twenty-five years.

(Pub. L. 92–257, §2, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 87.)
|                                                      | State or Other |   |       |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|--------|------------|--------|
|                                                      | Jurisdiction of     |   | Percentage |   |
|                                                      | Incorporation            |   | Ownership  |   |
| Parent                                                    |                     |   |       |   |
|                                                      |                     |   |       |   |
| Kentucky      First Federal Bancorp                       | United      States       |   |       | N/A    |   |
|                                                      |                     |   |       |   |   |
| Subsidiaries      (1)                                     |                     |   |       |   |   |
|                                                      |                     |   |       |   |   |
| First      Federal Savings and Loan Association of Hazard | United      States       |   |       | 100    | % |
|                                                      |                     |   |       |   |   |
| Frankfort      First Bancorp, Inc.                        | Delaware                 |   |       | 100    | % |
|                                                      |                     |   |       |   |   |
| First      Federal Savings Bank of Frankfort (2)          | United      States       |   |       | 100    | % |

----

| (1) | The      assets, liabilities and operations of the subsidiaries are included in the      consolidated financial statements contained in the Annual Report to      Stockholders attached hereto as Exhibit13. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | Wholly      owned subsidiary of Frankfort First Bancorp,  Inc. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------|

----
|                                       |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                       |  |  |
|                                  | SUBSIDIARIES LIST |   |
|                                  |   |   |
|                                  | Direct and Indirect Subsidiariesof Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. |   |
|                                  |   |   |
| Name                                  |   | Jurisdiction of Incorporated/Organization |
| Blacksmith Brands, Inc.               |   | Delaware |
| Medtech Holdings, Inc.                |   | Delaware |
| Medtech Products Inc.                 |   | Delaware |
| Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc.        |   | Virginia |
| Prestige Brands, Inc.                 |   | Delaware |
| Prestige Brands International, Inc.   |   | Virginia |
| Prestige Brands (UK) Limited          |   | England and Wales |
| Prestige Personal Care Holdings, Inc. |   | Delaware |
| Prestige Personal Care, Inc.          |   | Delaware |
| Prestige Services Corp.               |   | Delaware |
| The Cutex Company                     |   | Delaware |
| The Denorex Company                   |   | Delaware |
| The Spic and Span Company             |   | Delaware |
| Wartner USA B.V.                      |   | Netherlands |
### §733. Citizens; former Spanish subjects and children; body politic; name

All inhabitants continuing to reside in Puerto Rico who were Spanish subjects on the 11th day of April 1899, and then resided in Puerto Rico, and their children born subsequent thereto, shall be deemed and held to be citizens of Puerto Rico, and as such entitled to the protection of the United States, except such as shall have elected to preserve their allegiance to the Crown of Spain on or before the 11th day of April 1900, in accordance with the provisions of the treaty of peace between the United States and Spain entered into on the 11th day of April 1899; and they, together with such citizens of the United States as may reside in Puerto Rico, shall constitute a body politic under the name of the People of Puerto Rico, with governmental powers as hereinafter conferred, and with power to sue and be sued as such.

(Apr. 12, 1900, ch. 191, §7, 31 Stat. 79; May 17, 1932, ch. 190, 47 Stat. 158.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Puerto Rican Federal Relations Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Puerto Rico" substituted in text for "Porto Rico" pursuant to act May 17, 1932, which is classified to section 731a of this title.
Document

Exhibit 10.2

AMENDMENT NO.2 TO
AIRCRAFT DRY LEASE AGREEMENT
This AMENDMENT NO.2 TO THE AIRCRAFT DRY LEASE AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is entered in effective as of November 4, 2022, by and between STERLING2K LLC, a New York limited liability company with an address at 340 Crossways Park Drive, Woodbury, NY 11797 (“Lessor” or “Sterling”) and MSG ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company with an address at Two Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, New York 10121 (“Lessee” or “MSG”). Capitalized terms used but not defined elsewhere in this Amendment have the meanings assigned to them in the Aircraft Dry Lease Agreement, effective as of December 17, 2018, by and between Sterling and MSG (f/k/a MSG Sports & Entertainment, LLC) (the “Aircraft Dry Lease Agreement”).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 20 of the Aircraft Dry Lease Agreement, Sterling and MSG desire to amend the Aircraft Dry Lease Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
AMENDMENTS TO AIRCRAFT DRY LEASE AGREEMENT
Section 1.1.    The last sentence of Section 15 of the Aircraft Dry Lease Agreement is hereby amended and replaced by the following:
Routine communications may be made by e-mail to Lessor at officer@dfollc.com and to Lessee at guido.visconti@msg.com and legalnotices@msg.com or fax to Lessor at (516) 226-1155 and to Lessee at (516) 927-1101.
Section 1.2    The last sentence of Section 21 of the Aircraft Dry Lease Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following after “PDF transmission”: “or other electronic transmission service (e.g., DocuSign)”.
Section 1.3.    The last sentence of Schedule 1 of the Aircraft Dry Lease Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety by:
Additional Rent per block hour for True-Up Hours: $4,500.
ARTICLE II
MISCELLANEOUS
Section 2.1.    Except as expressly modified and superseded by this Amendment, the Aircraft Dry Lease Agreement shall continue to be in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. After the date of this Amendment, all references to the “Aircraft Dry Lease Agreement” or phrases with similar meaning shall refer to the Aircraft Dry Lease Agreement as amended by this Amendment.
Section 2.2.    The provisions of Section 18, Section 19, Section 20 and Section 21 of the Aircraft Dry Lease Agreement shall apply mutatis mutandis to this Amendment.










IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.
LESSOR:
STERLING2K LLC
By: /s/ Dennis Javer                                         
Name:     Dennis Javer
Title:     VP


LESSEE:
MSG ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, LLC
By: /s/ David F. Byrnes                                   
Name:     David F. Byrnes
Title:     EVP & Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
13.1








PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with this Annual Report of Top Ships Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or about the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Evangelos Pistiolis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.





Date:
June 29, 2009








/s/
      Evangelos Pistiolis


Evangelos
Pistiolis


President
and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHAOQING CHEN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-71504

Agency No. A088-113-526

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 9, 2012** 

Before: RAWLINSON, MURGUIA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Shaoqing Chen, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration

judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction

FILED

OCT 15 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-71504

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual

findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations

created by the REAL ID Act, Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039 (9th

Cir. 2010), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility finding based

on the numerous inconsistencies between Chen’s testimony at his hearing and his

testimony before an asylum officer, including inconsistencies regarding whether or

not Chen signed photographs of himself while he was detained, the distance to the

police station, the location of his interrogation room, the number and description of

the police officers who interrogated him, and the amount he paid a snakehead. See

id. at 1048 (adverse credibility determination was reasonable under the REAL ID

Act’s “totality of circumstances”); see also Rivera v. Mukasey, 508 F.3d 1271,

1275 (9th Cir. 2007) (adverse credibility finding was supported based on numerous

inconsistencies regarding the details of petitioner’s abduction, especially where her

entire claim centered around only two events). Chen’s explanations do not compel

a contrary conclusion. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir. 2000). We

reject Chen’s challenge to the agency’s reliance on the asylum officer’s notes. See

Singh v. Gonzales, 403 F.3d 1081, 1089-90 (9th Cir. 2005) (listing indicia of

reliability for an asylum officer’s notes). Further, Chen’s contention that the IJ
3 10-71504

was predisposed to discredit his testimony is not supported by the record. In the

absence of credible testimony, Chen’s asylum and withholding of removal claims

fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

Finally, Chen’s CAT claim also fails because it is based on the same

testimony found to be not credible, and he does not point to any other evidence that

shows it is more likely than not that he will be tortured if returned to China. See id.

at 1156-57.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
### **CHAPTER 224—RAILROAD REHABILITATION AND IMPROVEMENT FINANCING**

Sec.
22401.
Definitions.
22402.
Direct loans and loan guarantees.
22403.
Administration of direct loans and loan guarantees.
22404.
Employee protection.
22405.
Substantive criteria and standards.
22406.
Authorization of appropriations.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—SPECTRUM AUCTION AUTHORITY
§ 91.500 HUD approval action. ( a ) *General.* HUD will review the plan upon receipt. The plan will be deemed approved 45 days after HUD receives the plan, unless before that date HUD has notified the jurisdiction that the plan is disapproved.
( b ) *Standard of review.* HUD may disapprove a plan or a portion of a plan if it is inconsistent with the purposes of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12703), if it is substantially incomplete, or, in the case of certifications applicable to the CDBG program under §§ 91.225 (a) and (b) or 91.325 (a) and (b), if it is not satisfactory to the Secretary in accordance with §§ 570.304, 570.429(g), or 570.485(c) of this title, as applicable. The following are examples of consolidated plans that are substantially incomplete: ( 1 ) A plan that was developed without the required citizen participation or the required consultation;
( 2 ) A plan that fails to satisfy all the required elements in this part; and
( 3 ) A plan for which a certification is rejected by HUD as inaccurate, after HUD has inspected the evidence and provided due notice and opportunity to the jurisdiction for comment; and
( 4 ) A plan that does not include a description of the manner in which the unit of general local government or state will provide financial or other assistance to a public housing agency if the public housing agency is designated as “troubled” by HUD.
( c ) *Written notice of disapproval.* Within 15 days after HUD notifies a jurisdiction that it is disapproving its plan, it must inform the jurisdiction in writing of the reasons for disapproval and actions that the jurisdiction could take to meet the criteria for approval. Disapproval of a plan with respect to one program does not affect assistance distributed on the basis of a formula under other programs.
( d ) *Revisions and resubmission.* The jurisdiction may revise or resubmit a plan within 45 days after the first notification of disapproval. HUD must respond to approve or disapprove the plan within 30 days of receiving the revisions or resubmission.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2506-0117) [60 FR 1896, Jan. 5, 1995, as amended at 60 FR 56909, Nov. 9, 1995; 61 FR 54920, Oct. 22, 1996; 71 FR 6970, Feb. 9, 2006]