alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US 

To: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov> 

Cc: Bridgid Curry/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, "Mancini, Dominic J." <Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov>, Joseph-J Doug

Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 01/22/2010 10:54 PM 

Subject: RE: Updated version of the NO2 final notice 

Let me check and see what I can find. 

From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov> 

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Bridgid Curry/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, "Mancini, Dominic J." <Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov>, Joseph-J Doug

Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 01/22/2010 10:49 PM 

Subject: RE: Updated version of the NO2 final notice 

I believe it is just significant. Not economically significant. Do you 

have access to a boilerplate statement? Maybe from the Pb Monitoring 

Rule? 

-----Original Message----- 

From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 10:39 PM 

To: King, Heidi R. 

Cc: Curry.Bridgid@epamail.epa.gov; Mancini, Dominic J.; 

Dougherty.Joseph-J@epamail.epa.gov; Montoro.Marta@epamail.epa.gov; 

Jenkins.Scott@epamail.epa.gov; Crabtree.Tricia@epamail.epa.gov 

Subject: RE: Updated version of the NO2 final notice 

That's an interesting point. I wonder if it should be significant for 

the novel legal/policy issues, because you're right, it's not 

significant economically. What advice do you have? 

 

 From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov> 

 

 To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Mancini, Dominic J." 

 <Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov> 

 

 Cc: Bridgid Curry/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Marta 

Montoro/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Joseph-J 

 Dougherty/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Scott Jenkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Tricia 

 Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

 

 Date: 01/22/2010 10:36 PM 
 

 Subject: RE: Updated version of the NO2 final notice 

 

Lydia, does EPA want to retain "economically significant" designation in 

Section VIII? As strange as it seems to say this about a NAAQS, I don't 

believe this rule meets the definition. 

h 

-----Original Message----- 

From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 10:33 PM 

To: King, Heidi R.; Mancini, Dominic J. 

Cc: Curry.Bridgid@epamail.epa.gov; Montoro.Marta@epamail.epa.gov; 

Dougherty.Joseph-J@epamail.epa.gov; Jenkins.Scott@epamail.epa.gov; 

Crabtree.Tricia@epamail.epa.gov 

Subject: Fw: Updated version of the NO2 final notice 

Here's the track changes version. 

(See attached file: NO2 primary NAAQS-final (1-22-2010 track 

changes).doc.docx)
### §7304. Citizenship notation on merchant mariners' documents

An individual applying for a merchant mariner's document shall provide satisfactory proof that the individual is a citizen of the United States before that notation is made on the document.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 542.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 7304 | 46:643(b) |

Section 7304 specifies, that before a merchant mariner's document is noted to specify that the individual is a U.S. citizen, the individual must provide satisfactory proof that he is a citizen. This does not impose a requirement of United States citizenship as a condition for issuance of a document.
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**




**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**




We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
      Form
      S-8 filed on November 19, 2007 (File No. 333-147510) and the Registration
      Statements on Form SB-2 filed on September 26, 2007 (File No. 333-146320) and
      August 9, 2007 (File No. 333-145299) of ZAGG Incorporated of our report dated
      March 5, 2007 on the financial statements of ZAGG Incorporated (fka ShieldZone
      Corporation) as of December 31, 2006 and for the year ended December 31, 2006,
      which report is included in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of ZAGG
      Incorporated for the year ended December 31, 2007.




SALBERG
      & COMPANY, P.A.


Boca
      Raton, Florida


March
      27,
      2008
### §209. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 649

Section, act June 27, 1934, ch. 868, §9, 48 Stat. 1287, established a Railroad Retirement Board and set out its functions.
#### NEW YORK WATER CO., Respondent, v. BOARD OF WATER COM’RS OF CITY OF YONKERS, Appellant.

(No. 2.)

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 27, 1905.)

Action by the New York Water Company against the board of water commissioners of the city of Yonkers. No opinion. Order affirmed, on argument, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Exhibit
10.1





 


Worksport
Ltd.


Notice
of Performance Stock Unit Award


 


You
(the “Stockholder”) have been granted the following performance stock units (the “PSU”) of Worksport
Ltd. (the “Company”), par value $0.0001 per share, which may vest in the order provided for in the vesting schedule1
failing which the PSU shall stand rescinded and revert to the Company.


 


	Name
    of Grantee:	 	Steven
    Rossi
	 	 	 
	Shares:	 	400,000
	 	 	 
	Effective
    Date of Grant:	 	November
    11, 2022


 





Vesting
Schedule:


 


	Stock Price	 	 	Vesting %	 
	$	2.25	 	 	 	5	%
	$	2.48	 	 	 	10	%
	$	2.72	 	 	 	15	%
	$	2.99	 	 	 	20	%
	$	3.29	 	 	 	25	%
	$	3.62	 	 	 	30	%
	$	3.99	 	 	 	35	%
	$	4.38	 	 	 	40	%
	$	4.82	 	 	 	45	%
	$	5.31	 	 	 	50	%
	$	5.84	 	 	 	55	%
	$	6.42	 	 	 	60	%
	$	7.06	 	 	 	65	%
	$	7.77	 	 	 	70	%
	$	8.54	 	 	 	75	%
	$	9.40	 	 	 	80	%
	$	10.34	 	 	 	85	%
	$	11.37	 	 	 	90	%
	$	12.51	 	 	 	95	%
	$	13.76	 	 	 	100	%



 





The
Grantee and the Company hereby agree and acknowledge that this Grant is governed by the terms and conditions of the 2015 Equity Incentive
Plan (the “Plan”), which is incorporated herein by reference. The Grantee confirms that it has been provided with
a copy of the Plan.


 


	GRANTEE	 	WORKSPORT LTD.
	 	 	 	 
	/s/
    Steven Rossi	 	By:	/s/
    William Caragol
	Steven
    Rossi	 	Name:	William
    Caragol
	 	 	Title:	Chair,
    Compensation Committee





 


 











1
In accordance with the vesting schedule, a milestone is met if the VWAP exceeds the required price for ten (10) consecutive days,
with over $100,000 of trading volume (min) on each of those days.
```

                                                                                                       EXHIBIT 99.1
                                             **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                              18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Navistar International Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the
period ended October 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John R. Horne, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
            of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
            condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ John R. Horne       
John R. Horne
Chief Executive Officer
December 12, 2002

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be
deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

                                                       E-25
```
Case 3:09-cv-01991-CRB Document 26 Filed 07/02/10 Page 1 of 2Case 3:09-cv-01991-CRB Document 26 Filed 07/02/10 Page 2 of 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 888

#### Editorial Note:

For revisions and amendments affecting Schedules A, B, C, and D, issued under part 888, but not carried in the Code of Federal Regulations, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*

#### § 888.202 Manner of publication.

Adjustment Factors will be published in the Federal Register at least annually by Notice. Interim revisions may be published as market conditions indicate. In the case of revised factors applicable only to specific areas, the HUD Field Office will publish a notice appropriate to the limited scope of the revised factors (see § 888.204).

[42 FR 60508, Nov. 25, 1977, as amended at 44 FR 75383, Dec. 20, 1979; 47 FR 4252, Jan. 29, 1982]
#### State of Minnesota, *ex rel.*Theodore F. Knappen, *vs.*Gilbert Clough.

May 9, 1876.

Constitution — County Attorney. — To be eligible to the office of county attorney a person need not be an attorney and counsellor at law, nor admitted to practise as such in any of the courts of the state.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Isanti county, *Vanderburgh,*J., presiding, overruling a demurrer to the complaint.

*M. Q. Butterfield,*for appellant.

*George P. Wilson,*Attorney General, and *L. R. Corn-man,*for respondent.

Gileillan, C. J.

The action is in the nature of *quo warranto*to oust defendant from the office of county attorney of Isanti county, to which he was elected, on the ground of his ineligibility to the office. The only ground of ineligibility alleged is that he is not an attorney and counsellor at law, nor has ever been admitted to practice as such in any of the courts of the state. Section 7, art. 7, of the constitution provides that “ every person who, by the provisions of this article, shall be entitled to vote at any election, shall be eligible to any office which now is, or hereafter shall be, elective by the people in the district where he shall have resided thirty days previous to such election, except as otherwise provided in this constitution, or in the constitution and laws of the United States.” The only offices which, by the constitution, require additional qualifications are those of judges of the supreme and district courts.

That the provisions of section 7, article 7, are unwise in not requiring proper qualifications for offices, the proper discharge of the duties of which calls for the exercise of peculiar learning and skill, there can be no doubt; but it is *18the constitutional rule, and we cannot add to it or take from it.

Order reversed.
### §1323i. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, acts Aug. 21, 1916, ch. 371, §7, 39 Stat. 528; Feb. 16, 1933, ch. 89, §3, 47 Stat. 812; June 13, 1940, ch. 358, §2, 54 Stat. 389, related to use of interest and profits on money-order and postal-savings funds and was omitted as not of general application, and as covered by the Canal Zone Code. The Canal Zone Code was subsequently redesignated the Panama Canal Code by Pub. L. 96–70, §3303(b), and repealed by Pub. L. 104–201, §3549.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7510

ROY FRANKLIN ECHOLS, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of Virginia Department of 

Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior

District Judge. (3:01-cv-00155-REP)

Submitted: April 17, 2014 Decided: April 21, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roy Franklin Echols, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore 

Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General; Leah A. Darron, OFFICE 

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Roy Franklin Echols, Jr., seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for 

reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not 

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012); 

Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Echols has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny Echols’ motion to 
3

appoint counsel, deny a certificate of appealability, and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 583.125 Grants for operating costs. ( a ) *General.* HUD will provide grants to pay a portion (as described in § 583.130) of the actual operating costs of supportive housing for up to five years.
( b ) *Operating costs.* Operating costs are those associated with the day-to-day operation of the supportive housing. They also include the actual expenses that a recipient incurs for conducting on-going assessments of the supportive services needed by residents and the availability of such services; relocation assistance under § 583.310, including payments and services; and insurance.
( c ) *Recipient match requirement for operating costs.* Assistance for operating costs will be available for up to 75 percent of the total cost in each year of the grant term. The recipient must pay the percentage of the actual operating costs not funded by HUD. At the end of each operating year, the recipient must demonstrate that it has met its match requirement of the costs for that year.
[58 FR 13871, Mar. 15, 1993, as amended at 61 FR 51175, Sept. 30, 1996; 65 FR 30823, May 12, 2000]
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3441 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to apply the child tax credit 

with respect to a taxable year to a child born within 9 months after 

the close of the taxable year and to a child who is stillborn or dies 

in utero during the taxable year. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 26, 2005 

Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. PAUL, Mr. HOSTETTLER, Mr. 

BACHUS, and Mr. SMITH of New Jersey) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to apply 

the child tax credit with respect to a taxable year to 

a child born within 9 months after the close of the 

taxable year and to a child who is stillborn or dies 

in utero during the taxable year. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Expecting Parents Re5 lief Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•HR 3441 IH 

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF CHILD TAX CREDIT. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 24 of the 

3 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to the child tax 

4 credit) is amended by adding at the end the following new 

5 paragraphs: 

6 ‘‘(3) CHILD BORN WITHIN 9 MONTHS AFTER

7 CLOSE OF TAXABLE YEAR.—A child born within 9 

8 months after the close of the taxable year shall be 

9 treated as a qualifying child for such taxable year. 

10 A credit allowable under this section with respect to 

11 any child described in the preceding sentence shall 

12 be allowed for the taxable year in which the child is 

13 born. 

14 ‘‘(4) CHILD WHO IS STILLBORN OR DIES IN

15 UTERO.—A child who is stillborn or dies in utero, 

16 whose death was not the result of a medical proce17 dure, the ingestion of a drug, or other action in18 tended by the child’s mother to result in the abor19 tion of the child, shall be treated as a qualifying 

20 child for the taxable year in which the child dies.’’. 

21 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made in 

22 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to children who are 

23 born, stillborn, or die in utero in taxable years ending after 

24 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
§ 960.201 Eligibility. ( a ) *Who is eligible?* ( 1 ) *Basic eligibility.* An applicant must meet all eligibility requirements in order to receive housing assistance. At a minimum, the applicant must be a family, as defined in § 5.403 of this title, must be income-eligible, as described in this section, and must meet the net asset and property ownership restriction requirements in § 5.618 of this title. Such eligible applicants include single persons.
( 2 ) *Low income limit.* No family other than a low income family is eligible for admission to a PHA's public housing program.
( b ) *Income used for eligibility and targeting.* Family annual income (see § 5.609) is used both for determination of income eligibility under paragraph (a) and for PHA income targeting under § 960.202
( c ) *Reporting.* The PHA must comply with HUD-prescribed reporting requirements that will permit HUD to maintain the data, as determined by HUD, necessary to monitor compliance with income eligibility and targeting requirement.
[66 FR 28799, May 24, 2001, as amended at 88 FR 9670, Feb. 14, 2023]
### §40904. Compensation by common carriers

(a) Certification of License and Services.—A common carrier may compensate an ocean freight forwarder for a shipment dispatched for others only when the ocean freight forwarder has certified in writing that it holds an ocean transportation intermediary's license (if required under section 40901 of this title) and has—

(1) engaged, booked, secured, reserved, or contracted directly with the carrier or its agent for space aboard a vessel or confirmed the availability of the space; and

(2) prepared and processed the ocean bill of lading, dock receipt, or other similar document for the shipment.

(b) Dual Compensation.—A common carrier may not pay compensation for services described in subsection (a) more than once on the same shipment.

(c) Beneficial Interest Shipments.—An ocean freight forwarder may not receive compensation from a common carrier for a shipment in which the ocean freight forwarder has a direct or indirect beneficial interest. A common carrier may not knowingly pay compensation on that shipment.

(d) Limits on Authority of Conference or Group.—A conference or group of two or more ocean common carriers in the foreign commerce of the United States that is authorized to agree on the level of compensation paid to an ocean freight forwarder may not—

(1) deny a member of the conference or group the right, upon notice of not more than 5 days, to take independent action on any level of compensation paid to an ocean freight forwarder; or

(2) agree to limit the payment of compensation to an ocean freight forwarder to less than 1.25 percent of the aggregate of all rates and charges applicable under a tariff and assessed against the cargo on which the services of the ocean freight forwarder are provided.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §7, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1539.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 40904 | 46 App.:1718(e). | Pub. L. 98–237, §19(e), Mar. 20, 1984, 98 Stat. 88; Pub. L. 105–258, title I, §116, Oct. 14, 1998, 112 Stat. 1912. |

Section

In this section, the words "ocean freight forwarder" are substituted for "ocean transportation intermediary, as defined in section 1702(17)(A) of this Appendix" and "ocean transportation intermediary" because the definition of "ocean transportation intermediary" in section 1702(17)(A) contains a definition of "ocean freight forwarder" which is restated as a separate definition.

In subsection (d)(1), the word "calendar" is omitted as unnecessary.
#### § 1204.213 May I obtain relief for a property that benefits from other Federal or State incentive programs?

You may obtain accounting and auditing relief for production from a marginal property under this subpart even if the property benefits from other Federal or State production incentive programs.
Exhibit 31

                          ACCREDITED HOME LENDERS, INC.
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

I, James A. Konrath, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
     containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
     included in the year covered by this annual report, of Accredited Mortgage
     Loan Trust 2005-4;

2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
     does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
     material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
     circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of
     the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required
     to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
     servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is
     included in these reports;

4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
     under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and based upon my
     knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement,
     and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
     obligations under that agreement; and

5.   The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
     servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
     report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a
     review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
     Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and
     servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports;

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company, as Trustee.

Date: March 24, 2006

Accredited Home Lenders, Inc., as Servicer
of Accredited Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-4

/s/ James A. Konrath
--------------------
Name: James A. Konrath
Title: Chairman of the Board
#### § 91.415 Strategic plan.

Strategies and priority needs must be described in the consolidated plan, in accordance with the provisions of § 91.215, for the entire consortium. The consortium is not required to submit a nonhousing Community Development Plan; however, if the consortium includes CDBG entitlement communities, the consolidated plan must include the nonhousing Community Development Plans of the CDBG entitlement community members of the consortium. The consortium must set forth its priorities for allocating housing (including CDBG and ESG, where applicable) resources geographically within the consortium, describing how the consolidated plan will address the needs identified (in accordance with § 91.405), describing the reasons for the consortium's allocation priorities, and identifying any obstacles there are to addressing underserved needs.

[85 FR 47909, Aug. 7, 2020]
vinwoswo ‘BNIAR _ . 0
ya eon See

|

h9
| HSEINNN NIMH

<

t

000°00/:)
HASINNN SNIMVEO

|
——

|
|

eee

HaSWNN ONIMVEG

BATHYMETRIC CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 METERS.
WITH SUPPLEMENTARY 2 METER CONTOURS
DATUM 15 MEAN LOWER LOW WATER

HSEWION SNIMW8d

low Water Aaeas tI . |

BELLINGHAM, WASH. (8Z) na he og

ty + PRELIMINARY
sop COPY enn |

CONTOURS IN CORRE? 22 METERS |

BELLINGHAM HOF
USE FOR CoPYING

VINHOZNVO “NIAXL «© NOLWHOdKOS
| en