alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 1730 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 1731 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 1732 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 1733 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 1734 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 1735 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 1736 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 1737 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 1738 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 1739 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 1740 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 1741 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 1742 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 1743 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 1744 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 1745 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 1746 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 1747 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 1748 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 1749 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 1750 1994
§ 1204.201 Who may obtain accounting and auditing relief? ( a ) You may obtain accounting and auditing relief under this subpart: ( 1 ) If you are a lessee or a designee for a Federal lease with production from a property that qualifies as a marginal property under § 1204.4;
( 2 ) If you meet any additional requirements for specific types of relief under this subpart; and
( 3 ) Only for the fractional interest in production from the marginal property for which you report and pay royalty. You may obtain relief even if the other lessees or designees for your lease or agreement do not request relief.
( b ) You may not obtain one or both of the relief options specified in this subpart on any portion of production from a marginal property if: ( 1 ) The marginal property covers multiple States; and
( 2 ) One of the States determines under § 1204.208 that it will not allow the relief option you seek.
TABLE OF CONTENTS     ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS  3      ARTICLE 2. THE GRANT AND EXERCISE OF PURCHASE OPTION  4      ARTICLE 3. EXERCISE PRICE  4      ARTICLE 4. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES  4      ARTICLE 5. OTHER COVENANTS  5      ARTICLE 6. CONFIDENTIALITY  6      ARTICLE 7. APPLICABLE LAW AND EVENTS OF DEFAULT  6      ARTICLE 8. DISPUTE RESOLUTION  6      ARTICLE 9. EFFECTIVENESS  6      ARTICLE 10. AMENDMENT  7      ARTICLE 11. COUNTERPARTS  7      ARTICLE 12. MISCELLANEOUS  7      EXHIBIT 1 PROXY  8 
 

 
PURCHASE OPTION AGREEMENTThis Purchase Option Agreement (“this Agreement”) is entered into in Beijing, People’s Republic ofChina (the “PRC”) on October 15, 2008 by and among:Party A: Fortune Software (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
(No. 83-CC-1900

#### Deborah Woodhouse Catlett, Claimant, *v.*The State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 3, 1986.*

Heitzinger, Condon & Hofstetter, for Claimant.

Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General (Ralanda Webb, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

Montana, C.J.

This matter is before the Court on the joint stipulation of the parties. This claim sounds in tort and is brought pursuant to section 8(d) of the Court of Claims Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 37, par. 439.8(d)).

The incident involved herein occurred on October 16, 1982, at or near mile marker 273 on Interstate 57 in Iroquois County, Illinois. The wheel of the car in which Claimant was a passenger caught in a rut in the pavement, causing the car to careen off the roadway into a nearby ditch. Claimaint suffered fractured vertebrae and other injuries as a result of the accident.

*100Based on the foregoing, Claimant, Deborah W. Catlett, is hereby awarded the sum of forty thousand ($40,000.00) dollars in full and final satisfaction of this claim.
### **CHAPTER 571—GENERAL AUTHORITY**

Sec.
57100.
National Defense Reserve Fleet.
57101.
Placement of vessels in National Defense Reserve Fleet.
57102.
Disposition of vessels.
57103.
Donation of vessels in the National Defense Reserve Fleet.
57104.
Acquisition of vessels from sale of obsolete vessels.
57105.
Acquisition of vessels for essential services, routes, or lines.
57106.
Maintenance, improvement, and operation of vessels.
57107.
Vessels for other agencies.
57108.
Consideration of ballast and equipment in determining selling price.
57109.
Operation of vessels purchased, chartered, or leased from Secretary of Transportation.
57110.
Salvage recoveries for subrogated ownership of vessels and cargoes.
57111.
Definition of obsolete vessel.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2023**—Pub. L. 118–31, div. C, title XXXV, §3514(j)(6), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 812, added items 57102, 57103, and 57111, struck out former items 57102 "Disposition of vessels not worth preserving" and 57103 "Donation of nonretention vessels in the National Defense Reserve Fleet", and renumbered former item 57111 as 57110.

**2019**—Pub. L. 116–92, div. C, title XXXV, §3509(b), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1977, added item 57111.

**2017**—Pub. L. 115–91, div. C, title XXXV, §3502(b)(9), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1911, added item 57100.

**2012**—Pub. L. 112–213, title IV, §408(b), Dec. 20, 2012, 126 Stat. 1571, substituted "Donation of nonretention vessels in the National Defense Reserve Fleet" for "Sale of obsolete vessels in National Defense Reserve Fleet" in item 57103.
#### § 891.840 Site and neighborhood standards.

For section 202 or 811 mixed-finance developments, the site and neighborhood standards described at § 891.125 and § 891.320 apply to the entire mixed-finance development.
### §504. Remission of fees and penalties

Any part of a fee, tax, or penalty paid or a forfeiture incurred under a law or regulation relating to vessels or seamen may be remitted if—

(1) application for the remission is made within one year after the date of the payment or forfeiture; and

(2) it is found that the fee, tax, penalty, or forfeiture was improperly or excessively imposed.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §4, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1491.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 504 | 46:2108. | |

Section

This section replaces 46 U.S.C. 2108, which was enacted as part of the codification of subtitle II of title 46 in 1983. That provision was based on section 26 of the Act of June 26, 1884, ch. 121, 23 Stat. 59, which prior to the subtitle II codification appeared at 46 U.S.C. 8 (1982 ed.). In the enactment of 46 U.S.C. 2108, the scope of the 1884 provision was narrowed, presumably inadvertently. This section restores the remissions authority to its prior scope. Note that 19 C.F.R. §4.24 (2003) still refers to "the authority to make refunds in accordance with section 26 of the Act of June 26, 1884 (46 U.S.C. 8)" as if that provision had not been replaced by 46 U.S.C. 2108 in 1983.
#### § 990.100 Purpose.

This part implements section 9(f) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (1937 Act), (42 U.S.C. 1437g). Section 9(f) establishes an Operating Fund for the purposes of making assistance available to public housing agencies (PHAs) for the operation and management of public housing. In the case of unsubsidized housing, the total expenses of operating rental housing should be covered by the operating income, which primarily consists of rental income and, to some degree, investment and non-rental income. In the case of public housing, the Operating Fund provides operating subsidy to assist PHAs to serve low, very low, and extremely low-income families. This part describes the policies and procedures for Operating Fund formula calculations and management under the Operating Fund Program.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6023

JIMMIE DONALD CREECH,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-94-1128-2)

Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: July 30, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmie Donald Creech, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Shea,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his habeas corpus petition, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), as

amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,

Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1217. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of

the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent that

a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Creech v. Angelone, No. CA-94-1128-2 (E.D. VA. Nov. 20, 1995). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Argued and submitted March 4,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration April 1, 1998

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Harry T. McCrea, Jr., Claimant. WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, *Petitioner, v.*Harry T. MCCREA, Jr., Arriola Bros., Inc., and SAIF Corporation, *Respondents.*

(WCB 93-02507, 93-05231; CA A98495)

956 P2d 1069

John M. Pitcher argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

James L. Edmunson waived appearance for respondent Harry T. McCrea, Jr.

No appearance by respondent Arriola Bros., Inc.

No appearance by respondent SAIF Corporation.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Deits, Chief Judge, and Edmonds, Judge.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. ORS 656.262(10); *Bay Area Hospital v. Landers,*150 Or App 154, 945 P2d 110 (1997).
### §1392. Local laws continued; courts

Until Congress shall otherwise provide, insofar as compatible with the changed sovereignty and not in conflict with the provisions of this section and sections 1391 1 and 1394 to 1396 of this title, the laws regulating elections and the electoral franchise as set forth in the code of laws published at Amalienborg the 6th day of April, 1906, and the other local laws, in force and effect in said islands on the 17th day of January, 1917, shall remain in force and effect in said islands, and the same shall be administered by the civil officials and through the local judicial tribunals established in said islands, respectively; and the orders, judgments, and decrees of said judicial tribunals shall be duly enforced. With the approval of the President, or under such rules and regulations as the President may prescribe, any of said laws may be repealed, altered, or amended by the colonial council having jurisdiction. The jurisdiction of the judicial tribunals of said islands shall extend to all judicial proceedings and controversies in said islands to which the United States or any citizen thereof may be a party.

(Mar. 3, 1917, ch. 171, §2, 39 Stat. 1132; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §39, 62 Stat. 992.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1391 of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 643.

#### Amendments

1948—Act June 25, 1948, repealed last sentence relating to appeals. See section 1294 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1948 Amendment

Amendment by act June 25, 1948, effective Sept. 1, 1948, see section 38 of that act set out as an Effective Date note preceding section 1 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

1 See References in Text note below.
### §1421f–1. Acknowledgment of deeds

Deeds and other instruments affecting land situate in the District of Columbia or any Territory of the United States may be acknowledged in the islands of Guam and Samoa or in the Canal Zone before any notary public or judge appointed therein by proper authority, or by any officer therein who has ex officio the powers of a notary public: Provided, That the certificate by such notary in Guam, Samoa, or the Canal Zone, as the case may be, shall be accompanied by the certificate of the governor or acting governor of such place to the effect that the notary taking said acknowledgment was in fact the officer he purported to be; and any deeds or other instruments affecting lands so situate, so acknowledged since the first day of January, 1905, and accompanied by such certificate shall have the same effect as such deeds or other instruments hereafter so acknowledged and certified.

(June 28, 1906, ch. 3585, 34 Stat. 552.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

For definition of Canal Zone, referred to in text, see section 3602(b) of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Organic Act of Guam which comprises this chapter.

Section is also classified to section 1663 of this title.

Section was formerly classified to sections 1358 and 1432 of this title.
### §56306. Use and transfer of vessels

(a) In General.—The Secretary of Transportation may repair, recondition, reconstruct, operate, or charter for operation, a vessel acquired under this chapter.

(b) Transfer to Other Agencies.—The Secretary may transfer the possession or control of a vessel acquired under this chapter to another department or agency of the United States Government on terms and conditions approved by the President. The department or agency shall promptly reimburse the Secretary for expenditures for just compensation, purchase price, charter hire, repairs, reconditioning, or reconstruction.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1656.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 56306 | 46 App.:1242(e). | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title IX, §902(e); as added Aug. 7, 1939, ch. 555, §3, 53 Stat. 1256; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(131), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 165. |

Section

In this section, the word "vessel" is substituted for "property" for consistency in the chapter.

In subsection (b), the words "Such reimbursements shall be deposited in the construction fund established by section 1116 of this Appendix" are omitted as impliedly repealed by 46 App. U.S.C. 1119 as amended in 1967.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3341 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3341

            To suspend temporarily the duty on Desmedipham.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 19, 2005

Mr. Jefferson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on Desmedipham.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESMEDIPHAM.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.09.76      3-                  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         ethoxycarbonylami                                                  31/2008
                         nophenyl
                         carbanilate (CAS
                         No. 13684-56-5)
                         (provided for in
                         subheadings
                         2924.29.41 and
                         3808.30.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1Neither party provided the Court with a chambers copy of the Joint CaseManagement Statement, or of the voluminous exhibits attached thereto.  For futurereference, the parties are reminded that, pursuant to Northern District General Order 45and this Court’s Standing Orders, parties are required to provide for use in chambers onepaper copy of each document that is filed electronically, such copy to be delivered no laterthan noon on the day after the document is filed electronically. 

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HAMILTON FEDERAL CREDIT UNION,

Plaintiff,

    v.

META FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., et al.

Defendant.                                                                      /

No. C 09-1059 MMC

ORDER CONTINUING CASEMANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Case Management Statement, filed June 17,

2010.1  In light of the parties’ joint statement that the parties anticipate filing, by mid-July, a

Stipulation of Dismissal of the action, the currently-scheduled case management

conference on calendar for June 25, 2010 is CONTINUED to August 13, 2010.  Any

updated case management statement shall be filed no later than August 6, 2010.    

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:  June 22, 2010                                                   MAXINE M. CHESNEYUnited States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01059-MMC   Document 24   Filed 06/22/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-12T18:59:35-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Fund. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: |   | March      31, 2008 |   |   |   |   |   | RIDGEWOOD ENERGY L      FUND, LLC                         |
|--------|--------|---------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                |   |   |   |   |   |                                                      |
|   |   |                |   | By:    |   | /s/    |   | ROBERT      E. SWANSON                                    |
|   |   |                |   |   |   | Name:  |   | Robert      E. Swanson                                    |
|   |   |                |   |   |   | Title: |   | President      and Chief Executive Officer                |
|   |   |                |   |   |   |   |   | (Principal      Executive Officer)                        |
|   |   |                |   |   |   |   |   |                                                      |
|   |   |                |   |   |   |   |   |                                                      |
| Dated: |   | March      31, 2008 |   | By:    |   | /s/    |   | KATHLEEN      P. MCSHERRY                                 |
|   |   |                |   |   |   | Name:  |   | Kathleen      P. McSherry                                 |
|   |   |                |   |   |   | Title: |   | Executive      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   |                |   |   |   |   |   | (Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer)         |

----
#### Irwin Kallman, Respondent, v. Wolf Corporation et al., Appellants.

— Order entered on September 26, 1962, denying defendants-appellants motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendants-appellants, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. Plaintiff, if he be so advised, may move within 30 days from the service of the order entered herein to vacate the dismissal on a proper affidavit of merits. In the light of this record and the nature of the companion action, it may well be that the inaction or delay is excusable. Nevertheless, to be relieved of the consequence of failure to prosecute, plaintiff, in addition, is required to submit an affidavit of merits. *(Ruderman*v. *Feffer,*10 A D 2d 704; *Be Long Gorp.*v. *J. Rich*Steers, *Inc.,*10 A D 2d 705.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Bastow, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3339 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3339

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 27, 2005

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 2061 South Park Avenue in Buffalo, New York, as the ``James T. 
                     Molloy Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2061 
South Park Avenue in Buffalo, New York, shall be known and designated 
as the ``James T. Molloy Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James T. Molloy Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 26, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```