alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               5
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,392
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,508
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,172
<PP&E>                                         137,565
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,162
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 173,268
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,357
<BONDS>                                        166,952
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           27,634
<PREFERRED>                                     23,000
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (90,868)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   173,268
<SALES>                                         54,842
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,842
<CGS>                                           48,386
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,360
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (795)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,213
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,206)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (430)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,776)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,776)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
§ 983.352 Vacancy payment. ( a ) *Payment for move-out month.* If an assisted family moves out of the unit, the owner may keep the housing assistance payment payable for the calendar month when the family moves out (“move-out month”). However, the owner may not keep the payment if the PHA determines that the vacancy is the owner's fault.
( b ) *Vacancy payment at PHA discretion.* ( 1 ) At the discretion of the PHA, the HAP contract may provide for vacancy payments to the owner (in the amounts determined in accordance with paragraph (b)(2) of this section) for a PHA-determined period of vacancy extending from the beginning of the first calendar month after the move-out month for a period not exceeding two full months following the move-out month. The PHA must include in its Administrative Plan the PHA's policy on the conditions under which it will allow vacancy payments in a HAP contract, the duration of the payments, amount of vacancy payments it will make to an owner, and the required form and manner of requests for vacancy payments, in accordance with paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
( 2 ) The vacancy payment to the owner for each month of the maximum two-month period will be determined by the PHA, and cannot exceed the monthly rent to owner under the assisted lease, minus any portion of the rental payment received by the owner (including amounts available from the tenant's security deposit). Any vacancy payment may cover only the period the unit remains vacant.
( 3 ) The PHA may make vacancy payments to the owner only if: ( i ) The owner gives the PHA prompt, written notice certifying that the family has vacated the unit and containing the date when the family moved out (to the best of the owner's knowledge and belief);
( ii ) The owner certifies that the vacancy is not the fault of the owner and that the unit was vacant during the period for which payment is claimed;
( iii ) The owner certifies that it has taken every reasonable action to minimize the likelihood and length of vacancy; and
( iv ) The owner provides any additional information required and requested by the PHA to verify that the owner is entitled to the vacancy payment.
( 4 ) The owner must submit a request for vacancy payments in the form and manner required by the PHA and must provide any information or substantiation required by the PHA to determine the amount of any vacancy payment.
[70 FR 59913, Oct. 13, 2005, as amended at 89 FR 38338, May 7, 2024]
#### In the Matter of Joseph M. Pelaez, Respondent, against Maryholt H. Pelaez, Also Known as Maryholt H. Maxwell, Appellant.

In a habeas corpus proceeding by a father against his former wife to obtain the custody of their two infant children, the proceeding having been remitted by this court to the Special Term for a hearing *(Matter of Pelaez,*8 A D 2d 743), the mother appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated February 10, 1960, made after the hearing and after reargument and rehearing, sustaining the writ, directing the mother forthwith to deliver the children to the father (the petitioner), and awarding custody of the children to him except during the vacation period between the termination of the Spring school term and the commencement of the Fall school term when custody is given to the *821mother. Order reversed on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, and proceeding remitted again to the Special Term for the purpose of taking further proof as to the present status of the petitioner (the father) and as to the welfare of the children, and for the purpose of making a new determination based on all the proof which may be adduced. Upon the argument of this appeal petitioner’s counsel stated that the petitioner, who was a resident of Cuba and a citizen of the United States, had returned to the United States. In view of the provisions of the divorce decree entered in Cuba and in view of the financial and international situation affecting American citizens presently residing in Cuba or who previously resided there, a new determination should be made in this proceeding after a consideration of all the circumstances, including those affecting the petitioner as a result of the developments in Cuba. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur. [23 Misc 2d 423.]
### **CHAPTER 16—REGIONAL RAIL REORGANIZATION**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec.
701.
Congressional declaration of policy.
702.
Definitions.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—UNITED STATES RAILWAY ASSOCIATION

711.
Formation and structure.
712.
Functions of Association.
713.
Access to information.
714, 715.
Omitted or Repealed.
716.
Final system plan.
717.
Adoption of final system plan.
718.
Review by Congress.
719.
Judicial review.
720.
Obligations of Association.
721.
Loans.
722.
Records, audit, and examination.
723.
Emergency assistance pending implementation.
724.
Authorization of appropriations.
725.
Interim agreements.
726.
Debentures and series A preferred stock.
727.
Additional purchases of Series A preferred stock.
728.
Reports to Congress.
729.
Advisory Board.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION

741.
Formation and structure.
742.
Powers and duties of Corporation.
743.
Valuation and conveyance of rail properties.
744.
Termination and continuation of rail services.
744a.
End of Conrail commuter service obligation.
745.
Continuing reorganization; supplemental transactions.
746.
Certificates of value.
747.
Protection of Federal funds.
748.
Abandonments.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—TRANSFER OF FREIGHT SERVICES

761 to 769c. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—EMPLOYEE PROTECTION

771 to 780. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER VI—MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

791.
Relationship to other laws.
792, 793.
Repealed.
794.
Tax payments to States.

#### SUBCHAPTER VII—PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEES

797.
Repealed.
797a.
Termination allowance.
797b.
Preferential hiring.
797c.
Central register of railroad employment.
797d.
Election and treatment of benefits.
797e.
Assignment of work.
797f.
Contracting out.
797g.
New collective-bargaining agreements.
797h.
Employee and personal injury claims.
797i.
Limitations on liability.
797j.
Preemption.
797k.
Factfinding panel.
797 l.
Class II railroads receiving Federal assistance.
797m.
Arbitration.
### Phytoecology of a greenstone habitat at Eagle, Alaska

By: Hansford T. Shacklette

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1198F

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### §4704. Removal of abandoned barges

(a)(1) The Secretary may remove a barge that is abandoned after complying with the following procedures:

(A) If the identity of the owner or operator can be determined, the Secretary shall notify the owner or operator by certified mail—

(i) that if the barge is not removed it will be removed at the owner's or operator's expense; and

(ii) of the penalty under section 4703.

(B) If the identity of the owner or operator cannot be determined, the Secretary shall publish an announcement in—

(i) a notice to mariners; and

(ii) an official journal of the county in which the barge is located

that if the barge is not removed it will be removed at the owner's or operator's expense.

(2) The United States, and any officer or employee of the United States is not liable to an owner or operator for damages resulting from removal of an abandoned barge under this chapter.

(b) The owner or operator of an abandoned barge is liable, and an abandoned barge is liable in rem, for all expenses that the United States incurs in removing an abandoned barge under this chapter.

(c)(1) The Secretary may, after providing notice under subsection (a)(1), solicit by public advertisement sealed bids for the removal of an abandoned barge.

(2) After solicitation under paragraph (1) the Secretary may award a contract. The contract—

(A) may be subject to the condition that the barge and all property on the barge is the property of the barge removal contractor; and

(B) must require the barge removal contractor to submit to the Secretary a plan for the removal.

(3) Removal of an abandoned barge may begin thirty days after the Secretary completes the procedures under subsection (a)(1).

(Added Pub. L. 102–587, title V, §5302, Nov. 4, 1992, 106 Stat. 5082.)
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual report on Form 10-KSB of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund XI, LLC, (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial and Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby certify that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 17, 2007                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                                    
|/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                              
|Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                                  
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)
Air Quality Monitoring Network Plan – July 2014 

APPENDIX A 

SCAQMD Network Depictions
Air Quality Monitoring Network Plan – July 2014 

A-1 

Figure 1 SCAQMD Ozone Monitoring Locations 
Air Quality Monitoring Network Plan – July 2014 

A-2 

Fi

gure 2 SCA

QMD PM10 Monitorin

g Locations
Air Quality Monitoring Network Plan – July 2014 

A-3 

Figure 3 SCAQMD Monitoring Locations for Nitrogen Dioxide 
Air Quality Monitoring Network Plan – July 2014 

A-4 

Figure 4 SCAQMD Monitoring Locations for Carbon Monoxide 
Air Quality Monitoring Network Plan – July 2014 

A-5 

Figure 5 SCAQMD Monitoring Locations for Sulfur Dioxide 
Air Quality Monitoring Network Plan – July 2014 

A-6 

Figure 6 SCAQMD Source and Ambient Particulate Lead Monitoring Locations
Air Quality Monitoring Network Plan – July 2014 

A-7 

Figure 7 SCAQMD PAMS Monitoring Locations 
Air Quality Monitoring Network Plan – July 2014 

A-8 

Figure 8 SCAQMD PM2.5 Monitoring Locations B = BAM FEM B1 = BAM 
Air Quality Monitoring Network Plan – July 2014 

A-9 

Figure 9 SCAQMD 2012 Air Quality Data Summary
## Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re O.W. Loyd, II

No. 06

- 19

- 00077

- CV Appeal from the 402nd District Court of

Wood County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2019

- 307 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by

Justice Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and

Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed

for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We further order that the appellant pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 12, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
EPA420-F-04-002 January 2004

C EPA's Tier 2 Vehicle and Gasoline Sulfur program, which was finalized in December 1999,

is now taking effect.

C This historic new program will result in cars, SUVs, pickups, and vans that are 77-95 percent

cleaner than todayÌs cars and trucks.

C At the same time, the program will result in cleaner-burning gasoline that contains 90 percent

percent less sulfur.

C For the first time:

< All passenger cars and light trucks will be covered by the same emission standards.

< Vehicles and fuels are being treated as a system, so that the cleaner vehicles will have the

low-sulfur gasoline that they need to run their cleanest.

< The emission standards will apply to all vehicles, regardless of the type of fuel they

operate on (e.g. gasoline, diesel, or alternative fuels).

C The Tier 2 program is the result of a groundbreaking cooperative effort among EPA, the auto

industry, the oil industry, states, environmental and public health groups, and others.

C Industry has stepped up to the challenge of meeting the very stringent standards.

< The auto industry will significantly exceed the required number of very clean vehicles

sold for Model Year 2004 (estimated to be 35 percent, rather than the required 25

percent).

< Oil refiners have been making large investments, and several refiners are already

introducing cleaner gasoline earlier than required.

C The changes to vehicles and gasoline will be essentially transparent to consumers:

< The performance and product selection of vehicles and fuels will not change.

< The very large benefits of this program will cost about $70-250 per vehicle and less than

2 cents per gallon of gasoline.

C For these costs, EPA expects significant air quality and health improvements:

< Even with the continuing increases in vehicle population and in the number of miles

driven, the nation's air quality is expected to improve.

< Less pollution from cars means fewer cases of respiratory disease and costs associated

therefrom (lost work productivity, medical expenses, etc.)

C A simplified version of the Tier 2 NOx standards and phase-in schedules, including the

emission standard bin structures, are below.
EPA420-F-04-002 January 2004

Phase-In Schedules for NOx Standards and Fuels

(does NOT include a number of exceptions and options)

Phase-in schedule for 0.07 g/mi NOx average

(all vehicles not complying with Tier 2 must comply

with interim standards through the phase-in period)

Year Cars & Light Trucks Heavier Trucks

2004 25%

2005 50%

2006 75%

2007 100%

2008 100% 50%

2009 100% 100%

Phase-in schedule for sulfur reductions in gasoline

Year Refinery Caps Corporate Average Refinery Average

2004 300 ppm 120 ppm N/A

2005 300 ppm 90 ppm 30 ppm

2006 80 ppm 90 ppm 30 ppm

Tier 2 Bins - NOx standards

Bin 1 0.00

Bin 2 0.02

Bin 3 0.03

Bin 4 0.04

Bin 5 0.07 (average standard)

Bin 6 0.10

Bin 7 0.15

Bin 8 0.20

Bin 9 (expires in 2006) 0.30

Bin 10 (expires in 2006) 0.60

Bin 11 (expires in 2006) 0.90
### §885. Union Pacific Railroad lands

The costs of surveying, selecting, and conveying lands granted to the Union Pacific Railroad Company shall become due and payable at and on the demand therefor made by the Secretary of the Interior as provided in section 883 of this title, and nothing in sections 882 to 885 of this title shall be construed or taken in any wise to affect or impair the right of Congress at any time further to alter, amend, or repeal the Act of July 2, 1864, chapter 216, as in the opinion of Congress, justice or the public welfare may require, or to impair or waive any right or remedy in the premises existing on July 10, 1886, in favor of the United States. Sections 882 to 885 of this title shall be subject to alteration, amendment, or repeal.

(July 10, 1886, ch. 764, §4, 24 Stat. 143.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of July 2, 1864, referred to in text, is act July 2, 1864, ch. 216, 13 Stat. 357, which enacted section 942–3 of this title and first paragraph of former section 83 of Title 45, Railroads. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
3-1 Public Involvement Implementation 

CHAPTER 3 

PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT IN IMPLEMENTATION

Land use plans and planning decisions are the 

basis for every on-the-ground action the BLM 

undertakes. They provide a framework to guide 

subsequent actions or plan implementation decisions. Implementation decisions are generally 

site-specific land management projects or actions designed to meet direction in the planning 

documents and decisions. Chapter 4, “Management Plan Implementation,” identifies future 

implementation priorities, which of course, are 

dependent on staffing and funding levels. Each 

project will be subject to additional site-specific 

NEPA analysis and documentation, associated 

Native American consultation, and appropriate 

National Historic Preservation Act and Endangered Species Act compliance. As each project 

is considered, the public will be given the opportunity to be involved in project-level planning 

and review. 

In addition to project planning and review as an 

opportunity for public participation, the Rio 

Puerco Field Office has an active volunteer program. There will be numerous opportunities for 

volunteers as the Kasha-Katuwe Tent Rocks 

RMP is implemented. 

To provide for more consistent, effective, and 

collaborative management of the Federal and 

Pueblo lands within and adjacent to the area 

known as Tent Rocks, the BLM and the Pueblo 

de Cochiti entered into an Inter-Governmental 

Cooperative Agreement in 1997. This agreement was followed in 2002 by a five-year Assistance Agreement between the Pueblo de Cochiti 

and the BLM. A second five-year Assistance 

Agreement was signed in January 2007. Under 

these agreements, the BLM seeks the Pueblo’s 

participation and involvement in public land use 

planning by personal invitation to agency activities and meetings. The Pueblo provides appropriate staff for planning and implementing the 

initiatives developed under the agreement. As 

envisioned by the Proclamation, the Pueblo de 

Cochiti will continue to participate in management of the Monument and implementation of 

the RMP.
###### Editorial Note on Part 982

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999, and at 89 FR 38293, May 7, 2024.

#### § 982.455 Automatic termination of HAP contract.

The HAP contract terminates automatically 180 calendar days after the last housing assistance payment to the owner.

[64 FR 26647, May 14, 1999]
Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT NO. 6


TO


CINEDIGM CORP. 2017
EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


 


AMENDMENT
NO. 6, dated as of November 10, 2022 (this “Amendment”), to the 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (as amended, the “Plan”)
of Cinedigm Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”).


 


WHEREAS,
the Corporation maintains the Plan, effective as of August 31, 2017; and


 


WHEREAS,
the Board of Directors of the Corporation deems it to be in the best interest of the Corporation and its stockholders to amend the Plan
in order to increase the maximum number of shares of the Corporation’s Class A Common Stock, par value $.001 per share, which may be issued
and sold under the Plan from 18,098,270 shares to 25,098,270 shares.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


 


1.
The first sentence of Section 4.1(a) shall be revised and amended to read as follows:


 


“The
maximum number of Shares available for issuance to Participants under this Plan, inclusive of Shares issued and Shares underlying outstanding
awards granted on or after the Effective Date, is 25,098,270 Shares, which includes 128,270 unused Shares carried over from the Existing
Incentive Plan.”


 


2.
This Amendment shall be effective as of the date first set forth above.


 


3.
In all respects not amended, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed and remains in full force and effect.


 


	 	CINEDIGM CORP.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Gary S. Loffredo
	 	Name:	Gary S. Loffredo
	 	Title:	President, Chief Operating Officer, General