alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection
with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of DreamWorks Animation SKG, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                                                       
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 23, 2010 |  | /s/    JEFFREY
KATZENBERG                             
|                         |  | Jeffrey Katzenberg Chief Executive Officer            
|                         | 
|Dated: February 23, 2010 |  | /s/    LEWIS W.
COLEMAN                               
|                         |  | Lewis W. Coleman President and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### MURRAY, Respondent, v. BUSSEL, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 23, 1903.)

Action by James Murray, as trustee, against David Bussel, impleaded. E. Blumenstiel, for appellant. A. Dreyer, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****Artist employment in ... [electronicresource].
 
1998 | 1999
2000 | 2000-2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2005
 
SuDoc Number:NF 2.20:
Item Number:0831-B-34 (online)
CGP System Number:000611838
 
 
 
** 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
August 14, 2017********
### Geology and ground-water resources of the Pica area, Tarapaca Province, Chile

By: R.J. DingmanCarlos O. Galli

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1189

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### §1425a. Legislative authority to create authorities; appointment of members; powers of authorities

The Legislature of Guam may by law grant to a public corporate authority, existing or to be created by or under such law, powers to undertake urban renewal and housing activities in Guam. Such legislature may by law provide for the appointment, terms of office, or removal of the members of such authority and for the powers of such authority, including authority to accept whatever benefits the Federal Government may make available, and to do all things, to exercise any and all powers, and to assume and fulfill any and all obligations, duties, responsibilities, and requirements, including but not limited to those relating to planning or zoning, necessary or desirable for receiving such Federal assistance, except that such authority shall not be given any power of taxation, nor any power to pledge the faith and credit of the territory of Guam for any loan whatever.

(Pub. L. 88–171, §1, Nov. 4, 1963, 77 Stat. 304.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Organic Act of Guam which comprises this chapter.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 246 (Friday, December 21, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 75695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-30863]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8130]

Overseas Schools Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting

    The Overseas Schools Advisory Council, Department of State, will 
hold its Executive Committee Meeting on Thursday, January 24, 2013, at 
9:30 a.m. in Conference Room 1107, Department of State Building, 2201 C 
Street NW., Washington, DC The meeting is open to the public and will 
last until approximately 12:00 p.m.
    The Overseas Schools Advisory Council works closely with the U.S. 
business community in improving those American-sponsored schools 
overseas that are assisted by the Department of State and attended by 
dependents of U.S. Government families and children of employees of 
U.S. corporations and foundations abroad.
    This meeting will deal with issues related to the work and the 
support provided by the Overseas Schools Advisory Council to the 
American-sponsored overseas schools. In addition there will be a report 
and discussion about the status of the Council-sponsored project to 
expand the World Virtual School.
    Members of the public may attend the meeting and join in the 
discussion, subject to the instructions of the Chair. Admittance of 
public members will be limited to the seating available. Access to the 
State Department is controlled, and individual building passes are 
required for all attendees. Persons who plan to attend should advise 
the office of Dr. Keith D. Miller, Department of State,
    Office of Overseas Schools, telephone 202-261-8200, prior to 
January 14, 2013. Each visitor will be asked to provide his/her date of 
birth and either driver's license or passport number at the time of 
registration and attendance, and must carry a valid photo ID to the 
meeting.
    Personal data is requested pursuant to Public Law 99-399 (Omnibus 
Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986), as amended; Public 
Law 107-56 (USA PATRIOT Act); and Executive Order 13356. The purpose of 
the collection is to validate the identity of individuals who enter 
Department facilities. The data will be entered into the Visitor Access 
Control System (VACS-D) database. Please see the Security Records 
System of Records Notice (State-36) at http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/103419.pdf for additional information.
    Any requests for reasonable accommodation should be made at the 
time of registration. All such requests will be considered, however, 
requests made after January 10th might not be possible to fill. All 
attendees must use the C Street entrance to the building.

    Dated: December 17, 2012.
Keith D. Miller,
Executive Secretary, Overseas Schools Advisory Council.
[FR Doc. 2012-30863 Filed 12-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135925 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. SOUTH MACOMB DISPOSAL AUTHORITY, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices 

v SC: 135925 

 COA: 280209 

Macomb CC: 2004-004406-CZ 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL 

QUALITY and BROWNFIELD 

REDEVELOPMENT BOARD, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 18, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0519 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 27, 2008 

 Clerk
Editorial Note on Part 1206
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1206 (formerly part 206) appear at 67 FR 19111, Apr. 18, 2002.

§ 1206.148 How do I request a valuation determination? ( a ) You may request a valuation determination from ONRR regarding any gas produced. Your request must: ( 1 ) Be in writing;
( 2 ) Identify specifically all leases involved, all interest owners of those leases, the designee(s), and the operator(s) for those leases;
( 3 ) Completely explain all relevant facts. You must inform ONRR of any changes to relevant facts that occur before we respond to your request;
( 4 ) Include copies of all relevant documents;
( 5 ) Provide your analysis of the issue(s), including citations to all relevant precedents (including adverse precedents); and
( 6 ) Suggest your proposed valuation method.
( b ) In response to your request, ONRR may: ( 1 ) Request that the Assistant Secretary for Policy, Management and Budget issue a determination;
( 2 ) Decide that ONRR will issue guidance; or
( 3 ) Inform you in writing that ONRR will not provide a determination or guidance. Situations in which ONRR typically will not provide any determination or guidance include, but are not limited to: ( i ) Requests for guidance on hypothetical situations; or
( ii ) Matters that are the subject of pending litigation or administrative appeals.
( c ) ( 1 ) A determination that the Assistant Secretary for Policy, Management and Budget signs is binding on both you and ONRR until the Assistant Secretary modifies or rescinds it.
( 2 ) After the Assistant Secretary issues a determination, you must make any adjustments to royalty payments that follow from the determination, and, if you owe additional royalties, you must pay the additional royalties due, plus late payment interest calculated under §§ 1218.54 and 1218.102 of this chapter.
( 3 ) A determination that the Assistant Secretary signs is the final action of the Department and is subject to judicial review under 5 U.S.C. 701-706.
( d ) Guidance that ONRR issues is not binding on ONRR, delegated States, or you with respect to the specific situation addressed in the guidance. ( 1 ) Guidance and ONRR's decision whether or not to issue guidance or to request an Assistant Secretary determination, or neither, under paragraph (b) of this section, are not appealable decisions or orders under part 1290 of this title.
( 2 ) If you receive an order requiring you to pay royalty on the same basis as the guidance, you may appeal that order under part 1290 of this title.
( e ) ONRR or the Assistant Secretary may use any of the applicable criteria in this subpart to provide guidance or to make a determination.
( f ) A change in an applicable statute or regulation on which ONRR based any guidance, or the Assistant Secretary based any determination, takes precedence over the determination or guidance after the effective date of the statute or regulation, regardless of whether ONRR or the Assistant Secretary modifies or rescinds the guidance or determination.
( g ) ONRR may make requests and replies under this section available to the public, subject to the confidentiality requirements under § 1206.149.
§ 58.38 Environmental review record. The responsible entity must maintain a written record of the environmental review undertaken under this part for each project. This document will be designated the “Environmental Review Record” (ERR) and shall be available for public review. The Departmental Environmental Clearance Officer (DECO) shall establish a prescribed format that the responsible entity shall use to prepare the ERR. The DECO may prescribe alternative formats as necessary to meet specific program needs. ( a ) *ERR Documents.* The ERR shall contain all the environmental review documents, public notices and written determinations or environmental findings required by this part as evidence of review, decisionmaking and actions pertaining to a particular project of a recipient. The document shall: ( 1 ) Describe the project and the activities that the recipient has determined to be part of the project;
( 2 ) Evaluate the effects of the project or the activities on the human environment;
( 3 ) Document compliance with applicable statutes and authorities, in particular those cited in § 58.5 and 58.6; and
( 4 ) Record the written determinations and other review findings required by this part (e.g., exempt and categorically excluded projects determinations, findings of no significant impact).
( b ) *Other documents and information.* The ERR shall also contain verifiable source documents and relevant base data used or cited in EAs, EISs or other project review documents. These documents may be incorporated by reference into the ERR provided that each source document is identified and available for inspection by interested parties. Proprietary material and special studies prepared for the recipient that are not otherwise generally available for public review shall not be incorporated by reference but shall be included in the ERR.
[61 FR 19122, Apr. 30, 1996, as amended at 79 FR 49229, Aug. 20, 2014]
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AP RIL 30, 2014

NO. 03

- 12

- 00121

- CR

Willard Glen Wood, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES ROSE AND GO ODWIN

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the rec ord and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction

. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appe al, both in this Court and the

court below.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsComposites for Exploration Upper StageThe Composites for Exploration Upper Stage (CEUS) was a 3-year, level III project within the Technology Demonstration Missions program of the NASA Space Technology Mission Directorate. Studies have shown that composites provide important programmatic enhancements, including reduced weight to increase capability and accelerated expansion of exploration and science mission objectives. The CEUS project was focused on technologies that best advanced innovation, infusion, and broad applications for the inclusion of composites on future large human-rated launch vehicles and spacecraft. The benefits included near- and far-term opportunities for infusion (NASA, industry/commercial, Department of Defense), demonstrated critical technologies and technically implementable evolvable innovations, and sustained Agency experience. The initial scope of the project was to advance technologies for large composite structures applicable to the Space Launch System (SLS) Exploration Upper Stage (EUS) by focusing on the affordability and technical performance of the EUS forward and aft skirts. The project was tasked to develop and demonstrate critical composite technologies with a focus on full-scale materials, design, manufacturing, and test using NASA in-house capabilities. This would have demonstrated a major advancement in confidence and matured the large-scale composite technology to a Technology Readiness Level 6. This project would, therefore, have bridged the gap for providing composite application to SLS upgrades, enabling future exploration missions.Document ID20160014739Acquisition SourceMarshall Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsFikes, J. C.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Jackson, J. R.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Richardson, S. W.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Thomas, A. D.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Mann, T. O.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Miller, S. G.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredDecember 19, 2016Publication DateDecember 1, 2016Subject CategoryEngineering (General)Spacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2016-219433M-1422MSFC-E-DAA-TN33615Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.KeywordscompositesjointsmanufacturingAvailable DownloadsNameType20160014739.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Jaguar Cars Limited EMISSION DEFECT INFORMATION REPORT No. J10008D0A Causal part name: SENDER AND PUMP ASSEMBLY Causal part number: XR852872

Issued: 19 May 2010 Page 1 of 2 Code of Federal Regulations. Title 40. Part 85. Subpart T. §85.1903 - Emissions Defect Information Report

(c)(1) The manufacturers corporate name. Jaguar Cars Limited.

(c)(2) A description of the defect. Drivers of Jaguar XJ and S-type vehicles experience poor or no-start, rough & uneven running and M.I.L. illumination. Dealer technicians identify a defective fuel pump as the root cause of the problem.

(c)(3) A description of each class or category of vehicles potentially affected by the defect including make, model, model year, and such other information as may be required to identify these vehicles. See table in section (c)(4)(i) below. (c)(4) For each class or category of vehicle or engine d escribed in response to paragraph (c)(3) of this section, the following shall also be provided: (c)(4)(i) The number of vehicles or engines known or estimated to have the defe ct and an explanation of the means by which this number was determined.

MODEL YEAR MODEL TEST GROUP SALES DEFECTS 2006 S-TYPE 3.0 6JCXV03.0DNK 5125 14 2006 XJ8; XJ8L; VDP LWB; S-TYPE 4.2 6JCXV04.2DNK 6120 64 2007 S-TYPE 3.0 7JCXV03.0DNK 1962 8 2007 XJ8; XJ8L; VDP LWB; S-TYPE 4.2 7JCXV04.2DNK 2997 22 2008 S-TYPE 3.0 8JCXV03.0DNK 1513 16 2008 XJ8; XJ8L; VDP LWB; S-TYPE 4.2 8JCXV04.2DNK 4241 22 2009 XJ 9JCXV04.2DNK 511 1 The above data was taken from Jaguar's warranty tracking report dated 2009 Q4.

(c)(4)(ii) The address of the plant at which the potentially defective vehicles or engines were produced. Jaguar Castle Bromwich Plant, Birmingham, England. 

### EPA EDIR# 4033 5/25/2010Jaguar Cars Limited EMISSION DEFECT INFORMATION REPORT No. J10008D0A Causal part name: SENDER AND PUMP ASSEMBLY Causal part number: XR852872

Issued: 19 May 2010 Page 2 of 2 (c)(5) An evaluation of the emissions impact of the defect and a description of any driveability problems which a defective vehicle might exhibit. There is no adverse impact on emis sions associated with this issue. Driveability is adversely affected by poor or no-start, rough & uneven running. This defect illuminates the M.I.L.

(c)(6) Available emissions da ta which relate to the defect. There is no impact on emissions associated with this defect.

(c)(7) An indication of any an ticipated manufacturer follow-up. This issue is regarded as self campaigning, MIL illum ination plus uneven engine running will prompt drivers to return the vehicle to a Jaguar dealer for rectification. 

### EPA EDIR# 4033 5/25/2010
Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), Joseph Y.Liu, Chief Executive Officer of Oplink Communications, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that,to the best of his knowledge:**1.**The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 1, 2006, to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and**2.**The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition at the end of the period covered by the Quarterly Report and results ofoperations of the Company for the periods covered by the Quarterly Report.**In Witness Whereof,**the undersigned has set his hands hereto as of the 13th day of November, 2006.   /s/ Joseph Y. Liu   Joseph Y. Liu  Chief Executive Officer  This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SECand is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Actof 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing.