alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
39–008

105TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 105–56

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 400, THE

21ST CENTURY PATENT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT ACT

APRIL 16, 1997.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. MCINNIS, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 116]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 116, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 400, the

‘‘21st Century Patent System Improvement Act’’ under an open

rule. The rule provides 1 hour of general debate divided equally between the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary.

The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the

bill. The rule also makes in order the Committee on the Judiciary

amendment in the nature of a substitute now printed in the bill,

modified as specified in section 2 of the resolution.

The rule further waives all points of order against the amendment in the nature of a substitute, as modified, and provides that

it shall be considered as read. Also, the rule allows the Chairman

of the Committee of the Whole to postpone votes during consideration of the bill, and allows the Chairman of the Committee of the

Whole to reduce votes to 5 minutes on a postponed question if the

vote follows a 15-minute vote.

Members who have preprinted their amendments in the Record

prior to their consideration will be given priority in recognition to

offer their amendments if otherwise consistent with House rules.
2

Finally, the rule provides for one motion to recommit, with or without instructions.

Æ
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3414 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain refracting and reflecting 

telescopes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2005 

Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain refracting and 

reflecting telescopes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN REFRACTING AND REFLECTING TELE4 SCOPES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 
2 

•HR 3414 IH 

‘‘ 9902.90.05 Refracting telescopes with 

50 mm or smaller lenses and 

reflecting telescopes with 76 

mm or smaller lenses, and 

parts and accessories thereof 

(provided for in subheading 

9005.80.40) ......................... Free Free No change On or before 

12/31/2010 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 3282
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3282 appear at 78 FR 60199, Oct. 1, 2013.

§ 3282.402 General provisions. ( a ) *Purchaser's rights.* Nothing in this subpart shall limit the rights of the purchaser under any contract or applicable law.
( b ) *Manufacturer's liability limited.* A manufacturer is not responsible for failures that occur in any manufactured home or component as the result of normal wear and aging, consumer abuse, or neglect of maintenance. The life of a component warranty may be one of the indicators used to establish normal wear and aging. A failure of any component may not be attributed by the manufacturer to normal wear and aging under this subpart during the term of any applicable warranty provided by the original manufacturer of the affected component.
### §40104. Reports filed with the Commission

(a) Reports.—

(1) In general.—The Federal Maritime Commission may require a common carrier or marine terminal operator, or an officer, receiver, trustee, lessee, agent, or employee of the common carrier or marine terminal operator to file with the Commission a periodical or special report, an account, record, rate, or charge, or a memorandum of facts and transactions related to the business of the common carrier or marine terminal operator, as applicable.

(2) Requirements.—Any report, account, record, rate, charge, or memorandum required to be filed under paragraph (1) shall—

(A) be made under oath if the Commission requires; and

(B) be filed in the form and within the time prescribed by the Commission.

(3) Limitation.—The Commission shall—

(A) limit the scope of any filing ordered under this section to fulfill the objective of the order; and

(B) provide a reasonable period of time for respondents to respond based upon their capabilities and the scope of the order.

(b) Conference Minutes.—Conference minutes required to be filed with the Commission under this section may not be released to third parties or published by the Commission.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §7, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1527; Pub. L. 115–282, title VII, §705, Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4294.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 40104 | 46 App.:1714. | Pub. L. 98–237, §15, Mar. 20, 1984, 98 Stat. 84; Pub. L. 98–595, §3(b)(3), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 3133; Pub. L. 105–258, title I, §113, Oct. 14, 1998, 112 Stat. 1912. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–282 amended subsec. (a) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "The Federal Maritime Commission may require a common carrier or an officer, receiver, trustee, lessee, agent, or employee of the carrier to file with the Commission a periodical or special report, an account, record, rate, or charge, or a memorandum of facts and transactions related to the business of the carrier. The report, account, record, rate, charge, or memorandum shall be made under oath if the Commission requires, and shall be filed in the form and within the time prescribed by the Commission."
#### Kidder, Peabody & Co. v. Leonard Loewe et al.

Motion by-defendant Edward Edelman for an order striking the designation *“*respondent ” appearing after the name of said defendant from the title of these proceedings and for other relief, granted to the extent of striking the designation *“*respondent ” appearing after the name of Edward Edelman from the title of these proceedings. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Bastow, JJ.
### §7705. Subpenas and oaths

(a) An official designated to investigate or preside at a hearing on matters that are grounds for suspension or revocation of licenses, certificates of registry, and merchant mariners' documents may administer oaths and issue subpenas to compel the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of records or other evidence during investigations and at hearings.

(b) The jurisdictional limits of a subpena issued under this section are the same as, and are enforceable in the same manner as, subpenas issued under chapter 63 of this title.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 547; Pub. L. 99–36, §1(a)(9)(H), May 15, 1985, 99 Stat. 68.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 7705 | 46:239(e) |

Section 7705 allows officials designated to investigate or preside at hearings on matters that are grounds for suspension and revocation proceedings to administer oaths and issue subpenas.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1985—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–36 substituted "certificates of registry, and merchant mariners' documents" for "certificates, and documents".
§ 983.102 Housing accessibility for persons with disabilities. ( a ) *Program accessibility.* The housing must comply with program accessibility requirements of section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794) and implementing regulations at 24 CFR part 8. The PHA shall ensure that the percentage of accessible dwelling units complies with the requirements of section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794), as implemented by HUD's regulations at 24 CFR part 8, subpart C.
( b ) *Design and construction.* Housing first occupied after March 13, 1991, must comply with design and construction requirements of the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 and implementing regulations at 24 CFR 100.205, as applicable.
### SUBCHAPTER II—DIGITAL EQUITY ACT OF 2021
---

CERTIFICATION OF
  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Daniel Black, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
  Officer of Turbodyne Technologies, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Turbodyne Technologies, Inc., for
  the quarterly period ending June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements
  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
  information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents
  in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
  Turbodyne Technologies, Inc.

| | By: | /s/ Daniel Black
| | --- | ----------------
| |     |                 
| |     |                 
| |     | Name:           
| |     |                 
| |     | Title:          
| |     |                 
| |     |                 
| |     | Date:           

---
§ 880.505 Contract administration and conversions. ( a ) *Contract administration.* For private-owner/PHA projects, the PHA is primarily responsible for administration of the Contract, subject to review and audit by HUD. For private-owner/HUD and PHA-owner/HUD projects, HUD is responsible for administration of the Contract. The PHA or HUD may contract with another entity for the performance of some or all of its contract administration functions.
( b ) *PHA fee for Contract administration.* A PHA will be entitled to a reasonable fee, determined by HUD, for administering a Contract except under certain circumstances (see 24 CFR part 883) where a state housing finance agency is the PHA and finances the project.
( c ) *Conversion of Projects from one Ownership/Contractual arrangement to another.* Any project may be converted from one ownership/contractual arrangement to another (for example, from a private-owner/HUD to a private-owner/PHA project) if: ( 1 ) The owner, the PHA and HUD agree,
( 2 ) HUD determines that conversion would be in the best interest of the project, and
( 3 ) In the case of conversion from a private-owner/HUD to a private-owner/PHA project, contract authority is available to cover the PHA fee for administering the Contract.
### §55333. Exemption from restriction on transporting certain cargo

The 3-year documentation requirement of section 55305(a) of this title does not apply to a vessel designated as an American Great Lakes vessel during the period of its designation.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1649.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 55333 | 46 App.:1241q. | Pub. L. 101–624, title XV, §1521, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3665. |

Section

This section is substituted for the source provisions to eliminate unnecessary words.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1413

In re: SUSAN NEAL MATOUSEK, 

Petitioner. 

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (2:18-cv-00448-RAJ-LRL; 2:18-cv-00501-RAJLRL; 2:18-cv-00457-RAJ-LRL; 2:18-cv-00500-RAJ-LRL; 2:18-cv-00433-RAJ-LRL; 

2:18-cv-00445-RAJ-LRL; 2:18-cv-00446-RAJ-LRL; 2:18-cv-00597-RAJ-LRL; 2:18-cv00595-RAJ-LRL; 2:18-cv-00596-RAJ-LRL; 2:18-cv-00620-RAJ-LRL; 2:18-cv-00609-

RAJ-LRL; 2:18-cv-00293-RAJ-LRL; 2:18-cv-00301-RAJ-LRL)

Submitted: June 7, 2021 Decided: June 23, 2021

Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. 

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Susan Neal Matousek, Petitioner Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Susan Neal Matousek has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus and a supplement 

to the petition, seeking an order directing that her district court cases be reheard by another 

judge, that an investigation occur, that she be appointed counsel, and that police retaliation 

cease. We conclude that Matousek is not entitled to mandamus relief. 

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary 

circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004); In re Murphy-Brown, 

LLC, 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). Further, mandamus relief is available only when 

the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought and “has no other adequate means to 

attain the relief [she] desires.” Murphy-Brown, 907 F.3d at 795 (internal quotation marks 

and brackets omitted). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal, In re 

Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007), and this court does not have 

jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief against state officials, Gurley v. Superior Ct. of 

Mecklenburg Cnty., 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969) (per curiam). 

The relief sought by Matousek is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, 

we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus as supplemented. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
### §557. Existing franchises

(a) The provisions of—

(1) any franchise in effect on the effective date of this subchapter, including any such provisions which relate to the designation, use, or support for the use of channel capacity for public, educational, or governmental use, and

(2) any law of any State (as defined in section 153 of this title) in effect on October 30, 1984, or any regulation promulgated pursuant to such law, which relates to such designation, use or support of such channel capacity,

shall remain in effect, subject to the express provisions of this subchapter, and for not longer than the then current remaining term of the franchise as such franchise existed on such effective date.

(b) For purposes of subsection (a) and other provisions of this subchapter, a franchise shall be considered in effect on the effective date of this subchapter if such franchise was granted on or before such effective date.

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title VI, §637, as added Pub. L. 98–549, §2, Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2800; amended Pub. L. 104–104, §3(d)(3), Feb. 8, 1996, 110 Stat. 61.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

For "the effective date of this subchapter" and "such effective date", referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b), as 60 days after Oct. 30, 1984, except where otherwise expressly provided, see section 9(a) of Pub. L. 98–549, set out as an Effective Date note under section 521 of this title.

#### Amendments

1996—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 104–104 substituted "section 153" for "section 153(v)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 60 days after Oct. 30, 1984, except where otherwise expressly provided, see section 9(a) of Pub. L. 98–549, set out as a note under section 521 of this title.
### §7836. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 95–84, §2, Aug. 2, 1977, 91 Stat. 400; Pub. L. 95–467, title II, §205(a), (b), Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1311; Pub. L. 96–457, §3, Oct. 15, 1980, 94 Stat. 2032; Pub. L. 98–242, title I, §110(a), Mar. 22, 1984, 98 Stat. 101, which directed Secretary of the Interior to construct facilities demonstrating the engineering and economic viability of various desalting processes, was transferred, and is set out as a Desalting Plants note under section 10301 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Additional Authorization of Appropriations

Pub. L. 95–467, title II, §205(c), Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1311, which authorized an appropriation of $10,000,000 to remain available until expended for the fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 1980, and thereafter in addition to sums previously authorized to be appropriated to carry out the purpose of this section, was repealed by Pub. L. 96–457, §4, Oct. 15, 1980, 94 Stat. 2034, and Pub. L. 98–242, title I, §110(a), Mar. 22, 1984, 98 Stat. 101.
#### § 882.801 Purpose.

The purpose of the Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation Program for Single Room Occupancy (SRO) Dwellings for Homeless Individuals is to provide rental assistance for homeless individuals in rehabilitated SRO housing. The Section 8 assistance is in the form of rental assistance payments. These payments equal the rent for the unit, including utilities, minus the portion of the rent payable by the tenant under the U.S. Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437 *et seq.*).
### §53718. Annual report to Congress

The Administrator shall report to Congress annually on the loan guarantee program under this chapter. Each report shall include—

(1) the size, in dollars, of the portfolio of loans guaranteed;

(2) the size, in dollars, of projects in the portfolio facing financial difficulties;

(3) the number and type of projects covered;

(4) a profile of pending loan applications;

(5) the amount of appropriations available for new guarantees;

(6) a profile of each project approved since the last report; and

(7) a profile of any defaults since the last report.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1617; Pub. L. 109–163, div. C, title XXXV, §3507(c)(3), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3556; Pub. L. 110–181, div. C, title XXXV, §3522(a)(9)(C), (b), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 598.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 53718 | 46 App.:1280b. | Pub. L. 108–136, title XXXV, §3527, Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1802. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–181, §3522(b), repealed Pub. L. 109–163, §3507(c)(3). See 2006 Amendment note below.

Pub. L. 110–181, §3522(a)(9)(C), incorporated the substance of the amendment by Pub. L. 109–163, §3507(c)(3), into this section by substituting "Administrator" for "Secretary of Transportation" in introductory provisions. See 2006 Amendment note below and section 18(a) of Pub. L. 109–304, set out as a Legislative Purpose and Construction note preceding section 101 of this title.

2006—Pub. L. 109–163, §3507(c)(3), which directed the amendment of section 1280b of the former Appendix to this title from which this section was derived, was repealed by Pub. L. 110–181, §3522(b). See 2008 Amendment notes and Historical and Revision notes above.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Airbee Wireless, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for
the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I Sundaresan Raja, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)
    
    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of the operations of the Company.  /s/ Sundaresan RajaSundaresan RajaPresident & Chief Executive OfficerJuly 21, 2005
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 23

- 00630

- CV

Philip SIMPSON

, Appellant

v.

COUNTRY OAKS MHC

, Appellee

From the County Court a t Law No. 10

, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2023CV02529 Honorable Cesar Garcia , Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios Justice Beth Watkins , Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 20, 2023

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellant ’ s brief was originally due by November 2, 2023 and was not filed. We therefore

ordered appellant to file, by November 27, 2 023, his brief and a written response reasonably

explaining his failure to timely file a brief. In our order, we cautioned appellant if he failed to

timely file a brief and written response, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See

T EX

. R

. A PP

. P. 38.8(a); see also id. R. 42.3(c). Appellant did not respond to our order.

Accordingly, because appellant has failed to timely file a brief, we dismiss this appeal for want of

prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a); see also id. R. 42.3(c).

PER CURIAM
### §55334. Restrictions on operations

(a) Prohibitions.—Except as provided in subsection (b), an American Great Lakes vessel may not be used to—

(1) engage in trade—

(A) from a port in the United States that is not located on the Great Lakes; or

(B) between ports in the United States;

(2) transport bulk cargo (as defined in section 40102 of this title) that is subject to section 55305 or 55314 of this title or section 2631 of title 10; or

(3) provide a service (except ocean freight service) as—

(A) a contract carrier; or

(B) a common carrier on a fixed advertised schedule offering frequent sailings at regular intervals in the foreign trade of the United States.

(b) Off-Season Exception.—An American Great Lakes vessel may be used for not more than 90 days during any 12-month period to engage in trade prohibited by subsection (a)(1)(A), except during the Great Lakes shipping season.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1649.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 55334 | 46 App.:1241s. | Pub. L. 101–624, title XV, §1523, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3666. |

Section
### §80303. Speed of vessel in ice region

(a) Requirement.—The master of a vessel of the United States, when ice is reported on or near the vessel's course, shall proceed at a moderate speed or change the course of the vessel to go well clear of the danger zone.

(b) Civil Penalty.—A master violating this section is liable to the United States Government for a civil penalty of not more than $500.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §11, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1693.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 80303 | 46 App.:738c. | June 25, 1936, ch. 807, §4, 49 Stat. 1923. |

Section

In subsection (b), the words "liable to the United States Government for a civil penalty" are substituted for "liable to a fine" for clarity and for consistency in the revised title. The words "for each offense" are omitted as unnecessary.
#### § 983.209 Owner responsibilities.

The owner is responsible for performing all of the owner responsibilities under the Agreement and the HAP contract. 24 CFR 982.452 (Owner responsibilities) applies.

[70 FR 59913, Oct. 13, 2005. Redesignated at 79 FR 36168, June 25, 2014]
ELECTRONIC RECORD

fvv-/sr

COA # 14-13-01102-CR OFFENSE: Obstruction or Retaliation

STYLE: LeMarcus Ashontay Christmas v The State of Texas COUNTY: Fort Bend

COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed TRIAL COURT: 434th District Court

DATE: April 14.2015 Publish: Yes TC CASE #:12-DCR-059643

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

STYLE: LeMarcus Ashontay Christmas v The State of Texas

CCA#

APPELLANTS Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

tet?L£et>

DATE: _ 0?/ufe UV/^i,/J&lj:

JUDGE: ^M./1la^^

SW-& W./f CCA Disposition:

JUDGE:

SIGNED: PC:

PUBLISH: DNP:

MOTION FOR

FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD