alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated                this5th day of October, 2007.  | By:  | /s/                Liang Zhang                          |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                          |      | Liang                Zhang Chief                Executive Officer |

----
### §620i. Expenditures; units excepted from soil survey and land classification requirements

Expenditures for the Flaming Gorge, Glen Canyon, Wayne N. Aspinall, and Navajo initial units of the Colorado River storage project may be made without regard to the soil survey and land classification requirements of section 390a 1 of this title.

(Apr. 11, 1956, ch. 203, §10, 70 Stat. 110; Pub. L. 96–375, §7, Oct. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 1507.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 390a of this title, referred to in text, was in the original a reference to the Interior Department Appropriation Act, 1954. The soil survey and land classification requirements of that Act (act July 31, 1953, ch. 298, 67 Stat. 261, 266) were classified to section 390a of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–362, title IX, §901(e)(2), Nov. 10, 1998, 112 Stat. 3289.

#### Amendments

1980—Pub. L. 96–375 substituted "Wayne N. Aspinall" for "Curecanti".

1 See References in Text note below.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3122 

To exempt the natural aging process in the determination of the production 

period for distilled spirits under section 263A of the Internal Revenue 

Code of 1986. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 29, 2005 

Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To exempt the natural aging process in the determination 

of the production period for distilled spirits under section 

263A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF NATURAL AGING PROCESS IN 

4 DETERMINATION OF PRODUCTION PERIOD 

5 FOR DISTILLED SPIRITS UNDER SECTION 

6 263A. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 263A(f) of the Internal 

8 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to general exceptions) is 
2 

•HR 3122 IH 

1 amended by adding at the end the following new para2 graph: 

3 ‘‘(5) EXEMPTION OF NATURAL AGING PROCESS

4 IN DETERMINATION OF PRODUCTION PERIOD FOR

5 DISTILLED SPIRITS.—For purposes of this sub6 section, the production period for distilled spirits 

7 shall be determined without regard to any period al8 located to the natural aging process.’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 this section shall apply to production periods beginning 

11 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
§ 943.128 How does a consortium carry out planning and reporting functions? ( a ) During the term of the consortium agreement, the consortium must submit joint five-year Plans and joint Annual Plans for all participating PHAs, in accordance with part 903 of this chapter. HUD may prescribe methods of submission for consortia generally and where the consortium does not cover all program categories.
( b ) The consortium must maintain records and submit reports to HUD, in accordance with HUD regulations and requirements, for all of the participating PHAs. All PHAs will be bound by Plans and reports submitted to HUD by the consortium for programs covered by the consortium.
( c ) Each PHA must keep a copy of the consortium agreement on file for inspection. The consortium agreement must also be a supporting document to the joint PHA Plan.
Editorial Note on Part 1206
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1206 (formerly part 206) appear at 67 FR 19111, Apr. 18, 2002.

§ 1206.100 What is the purpose of this subpart? ( a ) This subpart applies to all oil produced from Federal oil and gas leases onshore and on the OCS. It explains how you, as a lessee, must calculate the value of production for royalty purposes consistent with mineral leasing laws, other applicable laws, and lease terms.
( b ) If you are a designee and if you dispose of production on behalf of a lessee, the terms “you” and “your” in this subpart refer to you and not to the lessee. In this circumstance, you must determine and report royalty value for the lessee's oil by applying the rules in this subpart to your disposition of the lessee's oil.
( c ) If you are a designee and only report for a lessee and do not dispose of the lessee's production, references to “you” and “your” in this subpart refer to the lessee and not the designee. In this circumstance, you as a designee must determine and report royalty value for the lessee's oil by applying the rules in this subpart to the lessee's disposition of its oil.
( d ) If the regulations in this subpart are inconsistent with a(an): Federal statute; settlement agreement between the United States and a lessee resulting from administrative or judicial litigation; written agreement between the lessee and ONRR's Director establishing a method to determine the value of production from any lease that ONRR expects would at least approximate the value established under this subpart; express provision of an oil and gas lease subject to this subpart, then the statute, settlement agreement, written agreement, or lease provision will govern to the extent of the inconsistency.
( e ) ONRR may audit, monitor, or review and adjust all royalty payments.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  APRIL 30, 2000 FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                         2127000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1387000
<ALLOWANCES>                                     50000
<INVENTORY>                                    3602000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8659000
<PP&E>                                        46441000
<DEPRECIATION>                                15897000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                41418000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4763000
<BONDS>                                       20475000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          4000
<OTHER-SE>                                    15242000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  41418000
<SALES>                                        8732000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8823000
<CGS>                                          5775000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5775000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2488000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 50000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              517000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  18000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     14000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               4000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4000
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00




</TABLE>
### §555. Judicial proceedings

#### (a) Actions to review determinations by franchising authorities

Any cable operator adversely affected by any final determination made by a franchising authority under section 541(a)(1), 545 or 546 of this title may commence an action within 120 days after receiving notice of such determination, which may be brought in—

(1) the district court of the United States for any judicial district in which the cable system is located; or

(2) in any State court of general jurisdiction having jurisdiction over the parties.

#### (b) Available relief

The court may award any appropriate relief consistent with the provisions of the relevant section described in subsection (a) and with the provisions of subsection (a).

#### (c) Review of constitutionality of sections 534 and 535

(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any civil action challenging the constitutionality of section 534 or 535 of this title or any provision thereof shall be heard by a district court of three judges convened pursuant to the provisions of section 2284 of title 28.

(2) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an interlocutory or final judgment, decree, or order of the court of three judges in an action under paragraph (1) holding section 534 or 535 of this title or any provision thereof unconstitutional shall be reviewable as a matter of right by direct appeal to the Supreme Court. Any such appeal shall be filed not more than 20 days after entry of such judgment, decree, or order.

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title VI, §635, as added Pub. L. 98–549, §2, Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2800; amended Pub. L. 102–385, §§7(a)(2), 23, 24(b), Oct. 5, 1992, 106 Stat. 1483, 1500, 1501.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–385, §7(a)(2), inserted "541(a)(1)," after "section".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 102–385, §24(b), inserted "and with the provisions of subsection (a)" after "subsection (a)".

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 102–385, §23, added subsec. (c).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–385 effective 60 days after Oct. 5, 1992, see section 28 of Pub. L. 102–385, set out as a note under section 325 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective 60 days after Oct. 30, 1984, except where otherwise expressly provided, see section 9(a) of Pub. L. 98–549, set out as a note under section 521 of this title.
### §70122. Waterway Watch Program

(a) Program Established.—There is hereby established, within the Coast Guard, the America's Waterway Watch Program.

(b) Purpose.—The Secretary shall administer the Program in a manner that promotes voluntary reporting of activities that may indicate that a person or persons may be preparing to engage or engaging in a violation of law relating to a threat or an act of terrorism (as that term is defined in section 3077 of title 18) against a vessel, facility, port, or waterway.

(c) Information; Training.—

(1) Information.—The Secretary may establish, as an element of the Program, a network of individuals and community-based organizations that encourage the public and industry to recognize activities referred to in subsection (b), promote voluntary reporting of such activity, and enhance the situational awareness within the Nation's ports and waterways. Such network shall, to the extent practicable, be conducted in cooperation with Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies.

(2) Training.—The Secretary may provide training in—

(A) observing and reporting on covered activities; and

(B) sharing such reports and coordinating the response by Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies.

(d) Voluntary Participation.—Participation in the Program—

(1) shall be wholly voluntary;

(2) shall not be a prerequisite to eligibility for, or receipt of, any other service or assistance from, or to participation in, any other program of any kind; and

(3) shall not require disclosure of information regarding the individual reporting covered activities or, for proprietary purposes, the location of such individual.

(e) Coordination.—The Secretary shall coordinate the Program with other like watch programs. The Secretary shall submit, concurrent with the President's budget submission for each fiscal year, a report on coordination of the Program and like watch programs within the Department of Homeland Security to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives.

(f) Authorization of Appropriations.—There are authorized to be appropriated for the purposes of this section $3,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2011 through 2016. Such funds shall remain available until expended.

(Added Pub. L. 111–281, title VIII, §801(a), Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 2988; amended Pub. L. 114–120, title III, §306(a)(11), Feb. 8, 2016, 130 Stat. 55.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2016—Pub. L. 114–120 substituted "Watch Program" for "watch program" in section catchline.
### §506. Authority of Secretary to make modifications

In order to preserve the structural safety of Bureau of Reclamation dams and related facilities the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to perform such modifications as he determines to be reasonably required. Said performance of work shall be in accordance with the Federal reclamation laws (Act of June 17, 1902, 32 Stat. 388, and Acts amendatory or supplementary thereto).

(Pub. L. 95–578, §2, Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2471.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of June 17, 1902, referred to in text, is popularly known as the Reclamation Act, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 371 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 1984 Amendment

Pub. L. 98–404, §1, Aug. 28, 1984, 98 Stat. 1481, provided in part: "That this Act [amending sections 508 and 509 of this title] may be cited as 'The Reclamation Safety of Dams Act Amendments of 1984'."

#### Short Title of 1978 Amendment

Pub. L. 95–578, §1, Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2471, provided: "That this Act [enacting this subchapter and amending section 1511 of this title] shall be cited as the 'Reclamation Safety of Dams Act of 1978'."

#### Facilities Included Within Scope of Reclamation Safety of Dams Act of 1978

Pub. L. 95–578, §12, as added by Pub. L. 98–404, §1(4), Aug. 28, 1984, 98 Stat. 1482, provided that: "Included within the scope of this Act [this subchapter] are Fish Lake, Four Mile, Ochoco, Savage Rapids Diversion and Warm Springs Dams, Oregon; Como Dam, Montana; Little Wood River Dam, Idaho; and related facilities which have been made a part of a Federal reclamation project by previous Acts of Congress. Coolidge Dam, San Carlos Irrigation Project, Arizona, shall also be included within the scope of this Act."
(No. 85-CC-0974

#### Rosetta Wheadon, Claimant, *v.*The State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 3, 1986.*

Edward L. Welch, for Claimant.

Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General (Claire Gibson Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

*166Montana, C.J.

This cause comes before the Court on the parties’ joint stipulation settlement which states:

This cause is a contract claim. The claim arises from the termination of the Claimant’s employment with the Respondent. Claimant was the President of the State Community College of East St. Louis, which is owned and operated by the Respondent, State of Illinois. Claimant entered into negotiations for an agreement with the Trustees of the State Community College of East St. Louis, wherein the Claimant was to terminate her employment before the end of the contractual period, in exchange for a certain sum of money. The exact amount of money was never finally agreed upon by all the parties, but the Claimant did voluntarily terminate her employment.

The parties have investigated this claim, and have knowledge of the facts and law applicable to the claim, and are desirous of settling this claim in the interest of peace and economy.

Both parties agree that an award of $63,900.90 is both fair and reasonable.

Claimant agrees to accept, and Respondent agrees to pay Claimant $63,900.90 in full and final satisfaction of this claim and any other claims against Respondent arising from the events which gave rise to this claim.

The parties hereby agree to waive hearing the taking of evidence, and the submission of briefs.

*167This Court is not bound by such an agreement but it is also not desirous of creating or prolonging a controversy between parties who wish to settle and end their dispute. Where, as in the instant claim, the agreement appears to have been entered into with full knowledge of the facts and law and is for a just and reasonable amount, we have no reason to question or deny the suggested award.

It is hereby ordered that the Claimant be awarded $63,900.90, in full and final satisfaction of this claim.
Opinion filed February26 , 2 009



### In The 

# Eleven th Court of Appeals

___________ 

### No. 1 1- 09 -0 00 47 -CR

____ ____ __ LEA TYIADE SHON JAC KSON , Ap pellant

V. STA TE OF TEX AS , A ppellee On App eal from the 142nd District Court Midland County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CR 25,545

M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N Th e tr ia l c ourt

c onvic te d L e atyia

De sh on Jac ks on , u

po n h is p le a

of g uil ty , of rob ber

y a s a repe at offe nder. A

ppellant also enter ed a ple a of true to the enhanc ement alleg ation. Pursuant to the plea ba rg ain agree ment, the trial cour t imposed a sentenc e of c onfi n em en t for ten year s. The sentenc e wa s imposed in open court on Nove mber 18, 1999. On Novembe r 21, 2008, appe llant filed i n the t rial court a pro se m otion requestingthat the trial court corre ct t he judgment t o ref lect that he w as not guilty of robbe ry

but was instead guilty

of a le sse r inc lud e d off

e ns e . Th e tr ia l cou

rt de nie d the mot ion
. Ap pe lla nt the n pe rf

e c te d this a

pp e a l.2

On J anuar

y 29, 2009, the cler

k of this court wrote the par ties advising the m that the trial court’s or der did n o t appea r to be a n appea lable orde r and dire ctingappellant to re spond showing grounds f or c on tin uin gthe a

pp e a l. A pp e lla nt h a s r e sp on de d b y

fi lin ga pr o s e br ie f a

nd a pr o s e supplementation for c ertifica tion of his right to a

ppeal. Appe llant contends that the 1999 judg ment should be corr ecte d to show that he wa s not convicted of r obbery but instead of theft by

dece ption. Appellant conte nds that the evidenc e only supported a conviction for the lesser of fense . Appellant contends that the store cler k handed him the money

with a smile after

he aske d her if she would g ive him the money

if he ha d a gun. Appellant has not e stablished that the 2008 orde r i s an appealable order . Appellant has f ailed to invoke the jurisdiction of this court. The a ppeal is dismissed.

PER C URI AM
Fe bruar y 26, 2009 Do not publish. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Wright, C.J ., M c C a l l , J. , an d

S tr an g e , J.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲

▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 2000 500 18 12 06 00 05/30 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL
Fw: Here is a clean version of the final NOx /SOx Secondary proposal for our 

clearance

Jan King to: Sherry Russell 07/13/2011 04:05 PM

Need to docket this too. Thanks. 

Jan King

Regulatory Development and Policy Analysis Group

phone: (919) 541-5665

fax: (919) 541-2664

Mailcode: C404-05

----- Forwarded by Jan King/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/13/2011 04:05 PM -----

From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "Laity, James A." <James_A._Laity@omb.eop.gov>, "Mancini, Dominic J." 

<Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jan King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Janet 

McCabe/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/12/2011 05:58 PM

Subject: Here is a clean version of the final NOx/SOx Secondary proposal for our clearance

Please let me know if you have any questions. And please let us know as soon as it's cleared. 

Lydia
EXHIBIT 23 - CONSENT OF ACCOUNTANTS
===================================


			 DE JOYA GRIFFITH & COMPANY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the use of Siam Imports, Inc. on Form 10-KSB of our Auditors'
Report, dated MaY 10, 2006, on the balance sheet of Siam Imports, Inc. as
of December 31, 2005 and the related statement of income and accumulated
deficit from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005, changes in stockholders'
equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2005.


/s/ De Joya Griffith & Company

May 15, 2006
Las Vegas, Nevada



			6330 McLeod Drive, Suite 1
			   Las Vegas, Nevada 89120
                            (702)736-1852 (voice)
                            (702) 736-1608 (fax)
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3389 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3389

     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain footwear for girls.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 2005

Mr. Ryun of Kansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain footwear for girls.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN FOOTWEAR FOR GIRLS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.64.18      Other footwear      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         with outer soles                                                   31/2009
                         of rubber,
                         plastics, leather
                         or composition
                         leather and
                         uppers of
                         leather, valued
                         not over $2.50
                         per pair, the
                         foregoing not
                         covering the
                         ankle, other than
                         house slippers
                         and other than
                         footwear for
                         women (except
                         footwear for
                         women with
                         pigskin uppers)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         6403.99.75)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```