alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

      EXHIBIT 11.1. STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


                                                  THREE MONTHS ENDED          NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                     SEPTEMBER 30,               SEPTEMBER 30,
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)                            1999         1998           1999         1998
--------------------------------------------------------------------    -----------------------
<S>                                          <C>           <C>             <C>          <C>

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE

   Net (loss) income                           $  (6,095)       $ 3,106      $    1,864    $    6,455
                                               ==========    ==========      ==========    ==========

   Weighted average number of common
   and common equivalent shares:               15,438,640    15,414,210      15,385,672    15,387,923

   Basic earnings per share                    $   (0.39)    $     0.20      $     0.12    $     0.42
                                               ===========   ==========      ==========    ==========


DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

   Net income                                  $   (6,095)   $    3,106      $    1,864    $    6,455
                                               ===========   ==========      ==========    ==========

   Weighted average number of common
   and common equivalent shares:
   ---------------------------------
    Average number of shares outstandinding    15,438,640    15,414,210      15,385,672    15,387,923

    Net effect of dilutive stock optionions
    based on the treasury method                   27,817            --          25,700        31,341

   Total average shares:                       15,466,457    15,414,210      15,411,372    15,419,264
                                               ===========   ==========      ==========    ==========

   Diluted earnings per share                  $    (0.39)   $     0.20      $     0.12    $     0.42
                                               ===========   ==========      ==========    ==========

                                        1

 </TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tumbleweed Communications Corp. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Timothy G. Conley, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 11, 2008



|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|/s/ TIMOTHY G. CONLEY                                                         
|Timothy G. Conley Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial
Officer
### §1715. Operation of Office; House privileges; compensation, allowances, and benefits; privileges and immunities; voting in committee

The Delegate from Guam and the Delegate from the Virgin Islands shall have such privileges in the House of Representatives as may be afforded him under the Rules of the House of Representatives. Until the Rules of the House of Representatives are amended to provide otherwise, the Delegate from each territory shall receive the same compensation, allowances, and benefits as a Member of the House of Representatives, and shall be entitled to whatever privileges and immunities are, or hereinafter may be, granted to the Resident Commissioner for Puerto Rico: Provided, That the right to vote in committee shall be as provided by the Rules of the House of Representatives.

(Pub. L. 92–271, §5, Apr. 10, 1972, 86 Stat. 119; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §224(4), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1752.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–186 struck out last two provisos which read as follows: "Provided further, That the clerk hire allowance of each Delegate shall be a single per annum gross rate that is 60 per centum of the clerk hire allowance of a Member: Provided further, That the transportation expenses of each Delegate that are subject to reimbursement under section 43b of title 2 shall not exceed the cost of four round trips each year."
#### Barbara J. Cirone et al., Respondents, v Tower Insurance Company of New York, Appellant.

[835 NYS2d 111]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karen S. Smith, J.), entered December 27, 2006, which, in an action to recover insurance proceeds pursuant to Insurance Law § 3420 (a) (2), denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and granted plaintiffs’ cross motion to the extent of granting partial summary judgment as to liability, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs were injured when, while walking on the street, they were struck by an underage bicyclist making a delivery for defendant’s insured. Plaintiffs’ counsel and an investigator made an unsuccessful attempt to identify the insurer of the bicyclist’s alleged employer, and then brought a tort action against defendant’s insured and its principal, who gave defendant insurer notice of the occurrence. Defendant admittedly assigned an employee to the matter and, in the course of working on the file, that employee admittedly contacted plaintiffs’ counsel, who provided certain information. Defendant disclaimed on the ground that its insured had not fulfilled its contractual duty to give notice of the occurrence as soon as *436practicable, but, under a stipulation, did file an answer on the insured’s behalf in the tort action. Under the particular circumstances of this case, where the efforts of the injured parties making a claim under Insurance Law § 3420 to facilitate proper notice “were sufficient in light of the opportunities to do so afforded [them] under the circumstances” (see *Appel v Allstate Ins. Co.,*20 AD3d 367, 369 [2005] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]), the motion court properly found that plaintiffs’ action is not barred by the circumstance that they did not give defendant insurer separate, formal, written notice of the occurrence in a communication initiated by them, in addition to the notice defendant received from its insured and the information it received from plaintiffs’ counsel. For this reason, we need not and do not reach plaintiffs’ argument that the disclaimer letter was ineffective as against them. In addition, in light of defendant’s failure to argue specifically before the motion court that there was only one occurrence within the meaning of the policy, we do not reach that point. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Sullivan, McGuire and Kavanagh, JJ.
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC.

Next Generation Hydrogen Station 

Composite Data Products

Data through Quarter 4 of 2014

Sam Sprik, Jennifer Kurtz, 

Chris Ainscough, Mike Peters

May 2015

NREL/PR-5400-64317
2

CDP-INFR-01

Hydrogen Dispensed by Quarter
3

CDP-INFR-02

Histogram of Fueling Rates
4

CDP-INFR-03

Histogram of Fueling Times
5

CDP-INFR-04

Histogram of Fueling Amounts
6

CDP-INFR-05

Dispensed Hydrogen per Day of Week
7

CDP-INFR-06

Station Capacity Utilization
8

CDP-INFR-07

Station Usage
9

CDP-INFR-08

Time Between Fueling
10

CDP-INFR-09

Fueling Final Pressures
11

CDP-INFR-10

Cumulative Number of Stations
12

CDP-INFR-11

Hydrogen Stations by Type
13

CDP-INFR-12

Fueling Rates 350 vs. 700 bar
14

CDP-INFR-13

Number of Fueling Events per Hour
15

CDP-INFR-14

Hydrogen Dispensed per Hour
16

CDP-INFR-15

Number of Fills by Time of Day
17

CDP-INFR-16

Fueling Amounts per Time of Day
18

CDP-INFR-17

Fueling Rates by Amount Filled
19

CDP-INFR-18

Fueling Amount vs. Time to Fill
20

CDP-INFR-19

Hydrogen Dispensed by Month
21

CDP-INFR-20

Number of Fills by Month
22

CDP-INFR-21

Maintenance by Equipment Type
23

CDP-INFR-22

Maintenance Labor Hours per Event
24

CDP-INFR-23

Equipment Category Repair Time
25

CDP-INFR-24

Failure Modes for Top Equipment Categories
26

CDP-INFR-25

Hydrogen Quality
27

CDP-INFR-26

Compressor Monthly Maintenance
28

CDP-INFR-27

Hydrogen Station Timeline
29

CDP-INFR-28

Maintenance Labor Hours by Month
30

CDP-INFR-29

Monthly Averages for 700 bar Fills >1 kg with Pre-Cool of −20°C
31

CDP-INFR-30

Maintenance Costs over Time
32

CDP-INFR-31

Safety Reports Primary Factors
33

CDP-INFR-32

Safety Reports by Equipment Involved
34

CDP-INFR-33

Safety Reports by Quarter
35

CDP-INFR-34

Safety Reports by Event Description
36

CDP-INFR-35

Compressor Energy
37

CDP-INFR-36

Electrolyzer Energy
38

CDP-INFR-37

Maintenance Reliability
39

CDP-INFR-38

Maintenance Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF)
40

CDP-INFR-39

Compressor Operation Cost
41

CDP-INFR-40

Station Costs by Daily Capacity
42

CDP-INFR-41

Average Station Cost by Category
43

CDP-INFR-42

Station Costs
44

CDP-INFR-43

Station Cost by Type
```

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 235 (Monday, December 7, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78887-78888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26899]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of 
the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Wednesday, 
December 9, 2020 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: The meeting will be webcast on the Commission's website at 
www.sec.gov.

STATUS: This meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. (ET) and will be open to 
the public via audio webcast only on the Commission's website at 
www.sec.gov.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider whether to adopt 
a new rule and rule amendments to modernize the national market system 
for the collection, consolidation, and dissemination of information 
with respect to quotations for and transactions in national market 
system (``NMS'') stocks (``NMS information''). Specifically, the 
Commission will consider whether to expand the content of NMS 
information that is required to be collected, consolidated, and 
disseminated as part of the national market system under Regulation NMS 
and whether to amend the method by which such NMS information is 
collected, calculated, and disseminated by fostering a competitive 
environment for the dissemination of NMS information via a 
decentralized

[[Page 78888]]

consolidation model with competing consolidators.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact Vanessa A. Countryman, Office of the Secretary, at (202) 
551-5400.

    Dated: December 2, 2020.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-26899 Filed 12-3-20; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```
§ 886.127 Lease requirements. ( a ) *Term of lease.* ( 1 ) The term of a lease, including a new lease or a lease amendment, executed by the owner and the family must be for at least one year, or the remaining term of the contract if the remaining term of the contract is less than one year.
( 2 ) During the first year of the lease term, the owner may not terminate the tenancy for “other good cause” under 24 CFR 247.3(a)(3), unless the termination is based on family malfeasance or nonfeasance. For example, during the first year of the lease term, the owner may not terminate the tenancy for “other good cause” based on the failure by the family to accept the offer of a new lease.
( 3 ) The lease may contain a provision permitting the family to terminate the lease on 30 days advance written notice to the owner. In the case of a lease term for more than one year, the lease must contain this provision.
( b ) *Required and prohibited provisions.* The lease between the owner and the family must comply with HUD regulations and requirements, and must be in the form required by HUD. The lease may not contain any of the following types of prohibited provisions: ( 1 ) *Admission of guilt.* Agreement by the family ( i ) to be sued,
( ii ) to admit guilt, or
( iii ) to a judgment in favor of the owner, in a court proceeding against the family in connection with the lease.
( 2 ) *Treatment of family property.* Agreement by the family that the owner may take or hold family property, or may sell family property, without notice to the family and a court decision on the rights of the parties.
( 3 ) *Excusing owner from responsibility.* Agreement by the family not to hold the owner or the owner's agents responsible for any action or failure to act, whether intentional or negligent.
( 4 ) *Waiver of notice.* Agreement by the family that the owner does not need to give notice of a court proceeding against the family in connection with the lease, or does not need to give any notice required by HUD.
( 5 ) *Waiver of court proceeding for eviction.* Agreement by the family that the owner may evict the family ( i ) without instituting a civil court proceeding in which the family has the opportunity to present a defense, or
( ii ) before a decision by the court on the rights of the parties.
( 6 ) *Waiver of jury trial.* Agreement by the family to waive any right to a trial by jury.
( 7 ) *Waiver of appeal.* Agreement by the family to waive the right to appeal, or to otherwise challenge in court, a court decision in connection with the lease.
( 8 ) *Family chargeable with legal costs regardless of outcome.* Agreement by the family to pay lawyer's fees or other legal costs of the owner, even if the family wins in a court proceeding by the owner against the family. (However, the family may have to pay these fees and costs if the family loses.)
[53 FR 3368, Feb. 5, 1988]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Mason, Also Known as Herman Grant, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 19, 1976, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Titone, Suozzi and Margett, JJ., concur; Hopkins, J. P., concurs in the result on the constraint of *People v Newton*(61 AD2d 1051).
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.1741 If I drag a trawl across a site, what requirements must I meet?

If you drag a trawl across the site in accordance with § 250.1740, you must meet all of the requirements of this section.

(a) You must drag the trawl in a grid-like pattern as shown in the following table:

| For a . . . | You must drag the trawl across a . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (1) Well site, | 300-foot-radius circle centered on the well location. |
| (2) Subsea well site, | 600-foot-radius circle centered on the well location. |
| (3) Platform site, | 1,320-foot-radius circle centered on the location of the platform. |
| (4) Single-well caisson, well protector jacket, template, or manifold, | 600-foot-radius circle centered on the structure location. |

(b) You must trawl 100 percent of the limits described in paragraph (a) of this section in two directions.

(c) You must mark the area to be cleared as a hazard to navigation according to USCG requirements until you complete the site clearance procedures.

(d) You must use a trawling vessel equipped with a calibrated navigational positioning system capable of providing position accuracy of ±30 feet.

(e) You must use a trawling net that is representative of those used in the commercial fishing industry (one that has a net strength equal or greater than that provided by No. 18 twine).

(f) You must ensure that you trawl no closer than 300 feet from a shipwreck, and 500 feet from a sensitive biological feature.

(g) If you trawl near an active pipeline, you must meet the requirements in the following table:

| For . . . | You must trawl . . . | And you must . . . |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (1) Buried active pipelines, | | First contact the pipeline owner or operator to determine the condition of the pipeline before trawling over the buried pipeline. |
| (2) Unburied active pipelines that are 8 inches in diameter or larger, | no closer than 100 feet to the either side of the pipeline, | Trawl parallel to the pipeline Do not trawl across the pipeline. |
| (3) Unburied smaller diameter active pipelines in the trawl area that have obstructions (e.g., pipeline valves) present, | no closer than 100 feet to either side of the pipeline, | Trawl parallel to the pipeline. Do not trawl across the pipeline. |
| (4) Unburied active pipelines in the trawl area that are smaller than 8 inches in diameter and have no obstructions present, | parallel to the pipeline, | |

(h) You must ensure that any trawling contractor you may use:

(1) Has no corporate or other financial ties to you; and

(2) Has a valid commercial trawling license for both the vessel and its captain.
[No. 7083.

Decided April 22, 1908.]

#### Cash Moore, *Respondent,*v. The National Accident Society, *Appellant.*
      *1*

Appeal — Review—Law oe Case. Upon appeal from a judgment of nonsuit, in an action on an insurance policy, a decision tliat tlie defendant waived all other objections by denying liability because of want of timely notice, is the law of the case, and upon a retrial by stipulation, on the same record, the defendant cannot raise the objection that the action was not commenced within the time limited by law, not raised on the first trial, and is consequently confined to the sufficiency of the notice.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Kittitas county, Rigg, J., entered April 17, 1907, upon findings *313in favor of the plaintiff,. after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action upon a policy of accident insurance.'

Affirmed.

*Fred Parker,*for appellant.

*Austin Mires*and *Graves*& *McDaniels,*for respondent.

Reported in 95 Pac. 268.

Crow, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff to recover benefits under an accident insurance policy. Upon the first trial a judgment of nonsuit was rendered against plaintiff, which judgment was subsequently reversed by this court. 38 Wash. 31, 80 Pac. 171. Upon the remanding of the case, a second trial was had, resulting in a judgment in favor of plaintiff, from which defendant prosecutes this appeal.

Appellant raises but one question, to wit: “Was this action commenced within the time limited by the contract of the parties as expressed in the policy itself?” Respondent contends that this question was necessarily involved in the decision of the case upon the former appeal, and that its determination then against the present appellant is now conclusive. We think this contention must be unheld. Pursuant to stipulation of the parties, the last trial was had upon the same record and evidence used at the former trial. Hence if the form of the record and evidence could now present the question mentioned, it must have done so on the first trial and appeal. In its opinion upon the former appeal, this court said:

> “As the company denied its liability and refused to treat with the insured on the ground of want of timely notice, its action amounted to a waiver of any other objection, and it is not now at liberty to vary its ground and insist that the appellant cannot recover because he failed to comply with some other condition of the policy.”

There was consequently no question left for determination except that as to the sufficiency of the notice of the accident. The decision became the law of the case and conclusive against this appellant as to the question now sought to be raised. *314
      *Wheeler v. Aberdeen,*47 Wash. 405, 92 Pac. 135; *Grant v. Walsh,*41 Wash. 542, 83 Pac, 1113.

The judgment is affirmed.

Hadley, C. J., Fullerton, Mount, and Root, J J., concur.
§ 1210.205 What reports must I submit to claim allowances on Indian coal leases? ( a ) *General.* You must submit the following ONRR forms to claim a transportation or washing allowance, as applicable, on Indian coal leases: ( 1 ) Form ONRR-4292, Coal Washing Allowance Report, to claim an allowance for the reasonable, actual costs incurred to wash coal under § 1206.458 of this chapter.
( 2 ) Form ONRR-4293, Coal Transportation Allowance Report, to claim an allowance for the reasonable, actual costs of transporting coal to a sales point or a washing facility remote from the mine or lease under § 1206.461 of this chapter.
( b ) *Reporting options.* You must submit the forms manually. You may find the forms at *http://www.onrr.gov/FM/Forms/AFSSol_Min.htm .*
( c ) *Reporting address.* You must submit completed Forms ONRR-4292 and ONRR-4293 by: ( 1 ) U.S. Postal Service regular or express mail addressed to Office of Natural Resources Revenue, P.O. Box 25165, MS 633000B, Denver, CO 80225-0165;
( 2 ) Special courier or overnight mail addressed to Office of Natural Resources Revenue, Building 85, Room A322, Denver Federal Center, West 6th Ave. and Kipling Blvd., Denver, Colorado 80225; or
( 3 ) Complete and submit the form electronically as an email attachment to *onrrindianforms@onrr.gov .*
[73 FR 15897, Mar. 26, 2008, as amended at 76 FR 76615, Dec. 8, 2011; 77 FR 25879, 25880, May 2, 2012; 78 FR 30205, May 22, 2013; 87 FR 21745, 21746, Apr. 13, 2022]
### §793a. Repealed. June 30, 1954, ch. 428, §1, 68 Stat. 336

Section, act Mar. 2, 1934, ch. 37, §4, 48 Stat. 361, created a Model Housing Board, and provided for construction and sale of model houses and for creation of a revolving "model housing fund".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Disposition of Moneys in Revolving Fund

Act June 30, 1954, ch. 428, §2, 68 Stat. 336, authorized transfer of any moneys remaining in revolving model housing fund under this section to treasury of Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.