alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 8.1
 List of Significant Subsidiaries and Affiliates of Hurray! Holding Co., Ltd.
 Name of Subsidiary or Affiliate
    
    State or Jurisdiction of IncorporationBeijing Hurray! Times Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaHurray! Solutions Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaBeijing Enterprise Network Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaBeijing WVAS Solutions Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaBeijing Palmsky Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaBeijing Hutong Wuxian Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaShanghai Magma Digital Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaBeijing Hengji Weiye Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaShanghai Saiyu Information Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaHenan Yinshan Digital Network Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaHurray! Digital Media Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaBeijing Huayi Brothers Music Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaBeijing Hurray! Freeland Digital Music Technology
Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaBeijing New Run Entertainment Development Co.,
Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaWuxi New Run Digital Music Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaGuangzhou Hurray! Secular Bird Culture
Communication Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaBeijing Huayi Brothers Music Broker Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaBeijing Hurray! Freeland Culture Development Co.,
Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaBeijing Hurray! Fly Songs International Culture
Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaLeguan Seed (Beijing) Culture Consulting Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaBeijing Hand-in-Hand Media Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaShanghai Fuming Information Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaXifuele (Beijing) Culture Broker Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaKu6 (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaWeiMoSanYi (Tianjin) Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaKu6 (Beijing) Information Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaTianjin Ku6 Zheng Yuan Information Technology
Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaHurray! Media Co., Ltd.
    
    Cayman IslandsKu6 Holding Limited
    
    Cayman IslandsInvest China Group Limited
    
    British Virgin IslandsSeed Music Group Limited
    
    British Virgin IslandsSeed Music Co., Ltd.
    
    Taiwan of ChinaProfita Publishing Limited
    
    Taiwan of ChinaHurray Technologies (HK) Ltd.
    
    Hong Kong
### §7110. Exhibiting licenses

Each holder of a license issued under this part shall display, within 48 hours after employment on a vessel for which that license is required, the license in a conspicuous place on the vessel.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 541.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 7109 | 46:229f46:232 |

46:232

Section 7110 requires licensed individuals to display the license in a conspicuous place on the vessel within 48 hours after they are employed.
BATHYMETRIC MAP

—
1 _ * fag"
“ = a N
i 7
I f
fa
Hb I
)
BS
a
| vm
ny
j >
oe one: . im 7
_

Pebibed 91 Weshrupen, 06
US. DEPARTMENT OF COMMEICE
NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMCSMERIC ADWTSTRATION
MaNiCRal OCEAN STIMICE
a3

TILLAMOOK BAY
NOS NU 10-7

BATIPNMETIIC CONTA MaTHeeaLy 10 METRE TO 700 METER PT
WENCH 50 METERS TD wAMMLIM Stet

RTP EAN COMMER LOW WATER

Dereon NCATE HEMET TICR
este 1280000
### §56501. Definition

In this chapter, the term "essential vessel" means a vessel that is—

(1)(A) security for a mortgage indebtedness to the United States Government; or

(B) constructed under this subtitle or required by a contract under this subtitle to be operated on a certain essential foreign trade route; and

(2) necessary in the interests of commerce and national defense to be maintained in condition for prompt use.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1656.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 56501 | 46 App.:1242a(a). | June 29, 1940, ch. 442, subdiv. (a), 54 Stat. 684. |

Section
Chase company logo here

OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC
MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATE

Pursuant to the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement (see Exhibit
"A") attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference), Chase
Home Finance LLC, successor by merger to Chase Manhattan Mortgage
Corporation, hereby provides the following Officers' Certificate:

(i)  A review of the activities of the Master Servicer (the "Servicer")
during the preceding calendar year and of performance under the related
Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer
has performed and fulfilled its duties, responsibilities and
obligations under each Agreement in all material respects throughout
such year.

/s/  Douglas C. Stephens
Douglas C. Stephens
Vice President
Default Loan Servicing

March 15, 2005

<page>

Exhibit A

Deutsche ID            Deal Name                   ASOC

MS04C6                  Morgan Stanley 2004-NC6    Chase
MS04C7                  Morgan Stanley 2004-NC7    Chase
MS04C8                  Morgan Stanley 2004-NC8    Chase
MS04H1                  Morgan Stanley 2004-HE1    Chase
MS04H2                  Morgan Stanley 2004-HE2    Chase
MS04H3                  Morgan Stanley 2004-HE3    Chase
MS04H4                  Morgan Stanley 2004-HE4    Chase
MS04H5                  Morgan Stanley 2004-HE5    Chase
MS04H6                  Morgan Stanley 2004-HE6    Chase
MS04H7                  Morgan Stanley 2004-HE7    Chase
MS04H8                  Morgan Stanley 2004-HE8    Chase
GS04C1                  GSAA 2004-NC1              Chase
GS04H1                  GSAMP 2004-HE1             Chase
GS0403                  GSAA 2004-3                Chase
FF0403                  GSAMP 2004-FF3             Chase
GS0405                  GSAA 2004-5                Chase
GS04H2                  GSAMP 2004-HE2             Chase
LH0401                  Lehman Sail 2004-1         Chase
§ 902.11 PHAS performance designation. All PHAs that receive a PHAS assessment shall receive a performance designation. The performance designation is based on the overall PHAS score and the four indicator scores, as set forth below. ( a ) *High performer.* ( 1 ) A PHA that achieves a score of at least 60 percent of the points available under the financial condition, physical condition, and management operations indicators and at least 50 percent of the points available under the Capital Fund indicator, and achieves an overall PHAS score of 90 percent or greater of the total available points under PHAS shall be designated a high performer. A PHA shall not be designated a high performer if it scores below the threshold established for any indicator.
( 2 ) High performers will be afforded incentives that include relief from reporting and other requirements, as described in § 902.71.
( b ) *Standard performer.* ( 1 ) A PHA that is not a high performer shall be designated a standard performer if the PHA achieves an overall PHAS score of at least 60 percent, and at least 60 percent of the available points for the physical condition, financial condition, and management operations indicators, and at least 50 percent of the available points for the Capital Fund indicator.
( 2 ) At HUD's discretion, a standard performer may be required by the field office to submit and operate under a Corrective Action Plan.
( c ) *Substandard performer.* A PHA shall be designated a substandard performer if the PHA achieves a total PHAS score of at least 60 percent and achieves a score of less than 60 percent under one or more of the physical condition, financial condition, or management operations indicators. The PHA shall be designated as substandard physical, substandard financial, or substandard management, respectively. The HUD office with jurisdiction over the PHA shall require a Corrective Action Plan if the deficiencies have not already been addressed in a current Corrective Action Plan.
( d ) *Troubled performer.* ( 1 ) A PHA that achieves an overall PHAS score of less than 60 percent shall be designated as a troubled performer.
( 2 ) In accordance with section 6(j)(2)(A)(i) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 1437d(j)(2)(A)(i)), a PHA that receives less than 50 percent under the Capital Fund program indicator under subpart E of this part will be designated as a troubled performer and subject to the sanctions provided in section 6(j)(4) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 1437(d)(j)(4)).
### §§161 to 170a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 161 to 170a, relating to Territory of Alaska, were omitted in view of admission of Alaska into the Union.

Section 161, act Jan. 27, 1905, ch. 277, §3, 33 Stat. 617, named Governor as the ex officio superintendent of public instruction and empowered him to prescribe rules and regulations for examination and qualification of teachers.

Section 162, acts Jan. 27, 1905, ch. 277, §4, 33 Stat. 617; Mar. 3, 1905, ch. 1491, 33 Stat. 1262, authorized establishment of school districts in towns.

Section 163, acts Jan. 27, 1905, ch. 277, §4, 33 Stat. 617; Mar. 3, 1905, ch. 1491, 33 Stat. 1262, provided for school boards, their term of office and expenditures.

Section 164, acts Jan. 27, 1905, ch. 277, §4, 33 Stat. 617; Mar. 3, 1905, ch. 1491, 33 Stat. 1262, empowered school boards to employ teachers and to provide for heating and lighting schoolhouses.

Section 165, act Jan. 27, 1905, ch. 277, §6, 33 Stat. 619, required clerks of school districts to report to the Governor.

Section 166, act Jan. 27, 1905, ch. 277, §5, 33 Stat. 617, authorized establishment of school districts outside incorporated towns.

Section 167, act Jan. 27, 1905, ch. 277, §5, 33 Stat. 617, provided for manner of election of school boards in school districts outside incorporated towns.

Section 168, acts Jan. 27, 1905, ch. 277, §5, 33 Stat. 617; June 1, 1938, ch. 312, 52 Stat. 607, directed Governor to assign proportion of Alaska fund to school districts.

Section 169, act Jan. 27, 1905, ch. 277, §7, 33 Stat. 619, related to education of white children, Eskimos, and Indians.

Section 170, act Mar. 3, 1917, ch. 167, 39 Stat. 1131, authorized legislature to establish schools for white and colored children and to appropriate funds for that purpose.

Section 170a, act May 14, 1930, ch. 273, §1, 46 Stat. 321, authorized Secretary of the Interior to enter into contracts with local school boards for education of children of nontaxpaying natives.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER****Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     I, Richard P. Brown, President and Chief Executive Officer of American Casino EntertainmentProperties LLC, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Casino & EntertainmentProperties LLC (the “Registrant”) for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”);     2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this Report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;     4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is beingprepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation;and  c) disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     By: /s/ Richard P. Brown Richard P. Brown
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER
Appellate case name: Alma Jean Bass v

. Deborah Bass, Independent E xecutrix of the Estate of Roberta Lois Stanbrough, Deceased

Ap pellate case number: 01

- 1 8

- 0 0 8 3 7

- C V

Trial court case number: 1 6

- C PR

- 0 2 9294

Trial court: County Court at L aw No. 2 of Fort Bend County

The record in this appeal was due in this Court on October 18 , 201 8

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.1 (a)

. A clerk’s record was filed on October 11 , 201 8 ; however , a reporter’s record has not been filed.

On October 25 , 2018, t he Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the court reporter responsible for preparing the reporter’s record had not filed a reporter’s record because appellant had not requested preparation of a reporter’s record or had not paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparation of the record

. See id. 37.3(c). T he Clerk further notified appellant that unless s he provided written evidence that s he had paid

, or made arrangements to pay

, for the reporter’s record, or provided proof that s he is entitled to proceed without payment of costs by November 26 , 2018 , the Court might consider the appeal without a reporter’ s record. See id. Appellant has not responded

. Accordingly, the Court will consider and decide those issues or points that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See id. 37.3. A ppellant ’ s brief is due to be filed no later than 3 0 days from the date of this order

. Id. 3 8

. 6(a) , (d)

. It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature:

__

/s/ Terry Jennings

______  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date:

__ December 6, 2018

____
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 1, 2021

NO. 03-21-00299-CV

Jared Everitt and Joseph Armand Ahouandjinou Imalet, Appellants

v.

The Ultimate Drive-In, LLC, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND KELLY

DISMISSED ON JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an interlocutory appeal from the order signed by the trial court on June 10, 2021. The 

parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the 

Court agrees that the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and 

dismisses the appeal, and remands the case to the trial court for further proceedings in 

accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement. Both parties shall bear all costs relating to 

this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Firearms Training Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronavan Mohling, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Ronavan MohlingRonavan MohlingChairman of the Board of Directors andChief Executive OfficerFebruary 14, 2006




29
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 24
- 0028 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, vs. DYLAN THOMAS BAKER,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including July 1 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 23 2024

05/23/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0028
§ 905.320 Contract administration and acceptance of work. ( a ) *Contract administration.* The PHA is responsible, in accordance with 2 CFR part 200, subpart D, for all contractual and administrative issues arising out of their procurements. The PHA shall maintain full and complete records on the history of each procurement transaction.
( b ) *Inspection and acceptance.* The PHA, or, in the case of mixed finance, the Owner Entity shall carry out inspections of work in progress and goods delivered, as necessary, to ensure compliance with existing contracts. If, upon inspection, the PHA determines that the work and/or goods are complete, satisfactory and, as applicable, otherwise undamaged, except for any work that is appropriate for delayed completion, the PHA shall accept the work. The PHA shall determine any holdback for items of delayed completion and the amount due and payable for the work that has been accepted, including any conditions precedent to payment that are stated in the construction contract or contract of sale. The contractor shall be paid for items only after the PHA inspects and accepts that work.
( c ) *Guarantees and warranties.* The PHA or, in the case of mixed finance, the Owner Entity, shall specify the guaranty period and amounts to be withheld, as applicable, and shall provide that all contractor, manufacturer, and supplier warranties required by the construction and modernization documents shall be assigned to the PHA. The PHA shall inspect each dwelling unit and the overall project approximately 3 months after the beginning of the project guaranty period, 3 months before its expiration, and at other times as may be necessary to exercise its rights before expiration of any warranties. The PHA shall require repair or replacement of all defective items prior to the expiration of the guaranty or warranty periods.
( d ) *Notification of completion.* The PHA, or in the case of mixed finance, the Owner Entity, shall require that all contractors and developers notify the PHA in writing when the contract work, including any approved off-site work, will be completed and ready for inspection.
[78 FR 63770, Oct. 24, 2013, as amended at 80 FR 75942, Dec. 7, 2015]
EXHIBIT 8.1
Subsidiaries of the Company

The following is a list of the Company's subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004.

                                        Country of           Portion of
Name of Significant Subsidiary          Incorporation        Ownership Interest
------------------------------          -------------        ------------------

Top Tanker Management Inc.              Marshall Islands     100%
Vermio Shipping Company Limited         Marshall Islands     100%
Rupel Shipping Company Inc.             Marshall Islands     100%
Gramos Shipping Company Inc.            Marshall Islands     100%
Olympos Shipping Company Limited        Marshall Islands     100%
Helidona Shipping Company Limited       Marshall Islands     100%
Kalidromo Shipping Company Limited      Marshall Islands     100%
Mytikas Shipping Company Limited        Marshall Islands     100%
Litochoro Shipping Company Limited      Marshall Islands     100%
Kisavos Shipping Company Limited        Marshall Islands     100%
Parnis Shipping Company Limited         Marshall Islands     100%
Imitos Shipping Company Limited         Marshall Islands     100%
Falakro Shipping Company Limited        Liberia              100%
Psiloritis Shipping Company Limited     Liberia              100%
Pylio Shipping Company Limited          Liberia              100%
Idi Shipping Company Limited            Liberia              100%
Taygetus Shipping Company Limited       Liberia              100%
Vitsi Shipping Company Limited          Liberia              100%
Parnasos Shipping Company Limited       Liberia              100%
Pageon Shipping Company Limited         Cyprus               100%
Vardousia Shipping Company Limited      Cyprus               100%
Parnon Shipping Company Limited         Cyprus               100%
Menalo Shipping Company Limited         Cyprus               100%
Pintos Shipping Company Limited         Cyprus               100%



23116.0001 #582832
".•::ARTMENTO 

RENEWABLES 

IBERDROLA ^:MWmok 

•Gil '^EP-I A S:2 5 

July 27, 2011 

Aloha Ley 

US Dept. of Transportation 

400 7* Street SW Room 6401 

Washington. DC 20590 

Subject: Small Community Air Service Development Grant Application 

Docket DOT-OST-2011-0119 

Klamath Falls, OR 

Dear Ms. Ley: 

Iberdrola Renewables is pleased to submit this letter of support for the Klamath Falls Airport 

grant application to the U.S. Department of Transportation Small Community Air Service 

Development Grant Program. We believe that there is high demand for a second round trip 

flight between Portland and Klamath Falls and that it will contribute greatly to the economic 

vitality of our area. We recognize the importance of quality commercial air service to the 

economy through improved access for visitors, and most importantly, to support area 

businesses, organizations and institutions. 

Iberdrola Renewables is pledging $1,500.00 in cash towards the advertising and promotion 

of this second roundtrip flight to Portland. 

The contemplated improvements will bring the material benefits of scheduled air 

transportation to a broad section of the traveling public, including businesses, educational 

institutions, and other enterprises whose access to the national air transportation system is 

limited. 

Again, Iberdrola Renewables strongly supports this grant application and we hope that you 

will give it favorable consideration. 

Sincerely, 

Raymond Martens 

Plant Managing Director - Klamath Cogeneration Project 

cc: Charles Massie - Klamath County Chamber of Commerce 

Mike Roberts 

IBERDROLA RENEWABLES. Inc. 

Klamalh Energy, LLC 

4940 Hwy 97 S 

Klamath Falls, OR 97603 

Telephone (541)883-3118
### §§1314b to 1314e. Repealed. Aug. 10, 1949, ch. 415, §9(d), 63 Stat. 597

Section 1314b, act June 19, 1934, ch. 657, §1, 48 Stat. 1116, related to intoxicating liquors in the Canal Zone.

Section 1314c, act June 19, 1934, ch. 657, §2, 48 Stat. 1116, related to penalties for violations of intoxicating liquor regulations.

Section 1314d, act June 19, 1934, ch. 657, §3, 48 Stat. 1116, related to repeal of prior laws.

Section 1314e, act June 19, 1934, ch. 657, §4, 48 Stat. 1116, related to effective date.