alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 943.142 In what types of operating organizations may a PHA participate? ( a ) A PHA may create and operate a wholly owned or controlled subsidiary or other affiliate; may enter into joint ventures, partnerships, or other business arrangements with individuals, organizations, entities, or governmental units. A subsidiary or affiliate may be a nonprofit corporation. A subsidiary or affiliate may be an organization controlled by the same persons who serve on the governing board of the PHA or who are employees of the PHA.
( b ) The purpose of any of these operating organizations would be to administer programs of the PHA.
Exhibit
10.2





 


Worksport
Ltd.


Notice
of Performance Stock Unit Award


 


You
(the “Stockholder”) have been granted the following performance stock units (the “PSU”) of Worksport
Ltd. (the “Company”), par value $0.0001 per share, which may vest in the order provided for in the vesting schedule1
failing which the PSU shall stand rescinded and revert to the Company.


 


	Name
    of Grantee:	 	Lorenzo
    Rossi
	 	 	 
	Shares:	 	300,000
	 	 	 
	Effective
    Date of Grant:	 	November
    11, 2022


 





Vesting
Schedule:


 


	Stock Price	 	 	Vesting %	 
	$	2.25	 	 	 	5	%
	$	2.48	 	 	 	10	%
	$	2.72	 	 	 	15	%
	$	2.99	 	 	 	20	%
	$	3.29	 	 	 	25	%
	$	3.62	 	 	 	30	%
	$	3.99	 	 	 	35	%
	$	4.38	 	 	 	40	%
	$	4.82	 	 	 	45	%
	$	5.31	 	 	 	50	%
	$	5.84	 	 	 	55	%
	$	6.42	 	 	 	60	%
	$	7.06	 	 	 	65	%
	$	7.77	 	 	 	70	%
	$	8.54	 	 	 	75	%
	$	9.40	 	 	 	80	%
	$	10.34	 	 	 	85	%
	$	11.37	 	 	 	90	%
	$	12.51	 	 	 	95	%
	$	13.76	 	 	 	100	%



 





The
Grantee and the Company hereby agree and acknowledge that this Grant is governed by the terms and conditions of the 2015 Equity Incentive
Plan (the “Plan”), which is incorporated herein by reference. The Grantee confirms that it has been provided with
a copy of the Plan.


 


	GRANTEE	 	WORKSPORT LTD.
	 	 	 	 
	/s/
    Lorenzo Rossi	 	By:	/s/
    Steven Rossi
	Lorenzo Rossi	 	Name:	Steven Rossi
	 	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer





 


 











1
In accordance with the vesting schedule, a milestone is met if the VWAP exceeds the required price for ten (10) consecutive days, with
over $100,000 of trading volume (min) on each of those days.
§ 965.305 Funding. ( a ) The cost of accomplishing cost-effective energy conservation measures, including the cost of performing energy audits, shall be funded from operating funds of the PHA to the extent feasible. When sufficient operating funds are not available for this purpose, such costs are eligible for inclusion in a modernization program, for funding from any available development funds in the case of projects still in development, or for other available funds that HUD may designate to be used for energy conservation.
( b ) If a PHA finances energy conservation measures from sources other than modernization or operating reserves, such as a loan from a utility entity or a guaranteed savings agreement with a private energy service company, HUD may agree to provide adjustments in its calculation of the PHA's operating subsidy eligibility under the PFS for the project and utility involved based on a determination that payments can be funded from the reasonably anticipated energy cost savings (See § 990.107(g) of this chapter).
Exhibit
10.23


 


AMENDMENT
#2 - EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


THIS
AMENDMENT #2 TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Agreement”), dated November 22, 2021 (the “Effective Date”) is between Progressive Care Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and its wholly
owned subsidiaries (the “Employer” or the “Company”), and Birute Norkute, an individual (“Employee”).


 


R
E C I T A L S:


 


	A.	Company
                                            and Employee entered into that certain Employment Agreement, effective as of January 3,
                                            2020 (the “Original Agreement”).’



 


	B.	Employee
                                            is knowledgeable with respect to the business of the Company.



 


	C.	Company
                                            desires to continue employment to Employee and Employee desires to continue employment by
                                            Company.



 


	D.	On
                                            November 22, 2021, the Company and the Employee agreed to enter into an amended and restated employment agreement.



 


	E.	The
                                            Company and Employee wish to amend certain compensation provisions of the Amended and Restated
                                            Employment Agreement.



 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the parties agree as follows:


 


	1.	Section 4, Compensation, is revised and amended as follows:




 


Paragraphs
(d) and (e) are deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following:


 


	 	(d)	Employee
                                            shall be granted five million (5,000,000) restricted stock units (the “RSU’s”)
                                            under and subject to all of the provisions of the related Restricted Stock Unit Agreement
                                            (the “Founders Award Agreement”). The restricted shares shall be vested immediately.



 


[the
remainder of the page has intentionally been left blank. signature page follows]


 






    	1



     


    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.


 


	PROGRESSIVE CARE INC.	 	 
	 	 	 
	By:	    	 	Dated: October 7, 2022
	 	Alan Jay Weisberg	 	 
	 	Chief Executive Officer	 	 
	 	 	 
	EMPLOYEE	 	 
	 	 	 
	  	 	Dated: October 7, 2022
	Birute Norkute, an individual	 	 




 






    	2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kim Cephus, Appellant.

[831 NYS2d 913]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated October 12, 2004 *(People v Cephus,*11 AD3d 553 [2004]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 17, 2002.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that she was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Miller, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Skelos, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Derek R. McClain, certify that:

1.                I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trammell Crow Company;

2.                Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)                Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)               Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)                Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of  the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a)                All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)               Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: August 9, 2004 |     | /s/ Derek R. McClain       |
|----------------------|----------|----------------------------|
|                 |     | Derek R. McClain           |
| * *             | * * | *Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                   79,600
<SECURITIES>                             34,565
<RECEIVABLES>                            34,113
<ALLOWANCES>                                295
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        172,155
<PP&E>                                   36,254
<DEPRECIATION>                            8,340
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          284,628
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    57,805
<BONDS>                                   1,894
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                  3,436
<OTHER-SE>                              218,127
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            284,628
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         51,888
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            27,739
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         18,730
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              7
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            4
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           7,007
<INCOME-TAX>                              3,340
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       3,667
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                              3,667
<EPS-BASIC>                               .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                               .10

<FN>
<F1> Amounts inapplicable or not disclosed as a separate line on the Statement
     of Financial Position or Results of Operations are reported as 0 herein.
</FN>

</TABLE>
#### § 1210.01 What is the purpose of this subpart?

This subpart identifies information collections required by the Office of Natural Resources Revenue (ONRR), in the normal course of operations. This information is submitted by various parties associated with Federal and Indian leases such as lessees, designees, and operators. The information collected meets the ONRR congressionally mandated accounting and auditing responsibilities relating to Federal and Indian minerals revenue management. Information collected regarding production, royalties, and other payments due the Government from activities on leased Federal or Indian land is authorized by the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act of 1982, as amended (30 U.S.C. 1701 *et seq.*), as well as 43 U.S.C. 1334 and 30 U.S.C. 189, 359, 396, and 396d for oil and gas production; and by 30 U.S.C. 189, 359, 396, and 396d for solid minerals production.
##### 



Exhibit 10.29
 
    Sale and Purchase of Securities; Closing
 Authorization
 Sale and Purchase
 Purchase Price
 Delivery




---



##### 



Representations and Warranties of the Purchaser
         Representations and Warranties of the Company
  2




---



##### 



Terms of the Class B Common Stock
 Voting Rights; Redemption Rights
 Dividends; Liquidation and Distribution pari passu
 3




---



##### 



Exchange Right
  Issuance of Shares on Exchange
  4




---



##### 



Repurchase Right
    5




---



##### 



Provisions in Case of a Change of Control
 Purchase obligation
 6




---



##### 



Taxes on Exchange
 No Registration under Federal or State Securities Laws
  7




---



##### 



Transfers
 No Preemptive Rights
 Miscellaneous
 Payment of Expenses
 Entire Agreement; Amendments
 Binding Effect
 8




---



##### 



Further Assurances
 Notices
  
   
  
  Severability
 9




---



##### 



Remedies Cumulative
 No Waiver
 No Third Party Beneficiaries
 Counterparts .
 Governing Law
 Arbitration
 10




---



##### 



Jurisdiction
 Descriptive Headings
 11




---



##### 



Gender and Number .
 [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]
 12




---



##### 



THE COMPANY:
SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS ALLIANCE, INC.By:
    /s/ William S. LoderName:
    William S. LoderTitle:
    Chief Underwriting OfficerTHE PURCHASER:
ÆON INSURANCE GROUP, INC.By:
    /s/ Lee WendletonName:
    Lee WendletonTitle:
    President 13




---



##### 



PURCHASER:




---



##### 



15




---



##### 



16
Exhibit 99.2


                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the accompanying quarterly report of Liteglow
Industries, Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending
September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Michael Krumholz,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of
2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



By:  /s/  Michael Krumholz
   -----------------------------
Name: Michael Krumholz


Date:  October 31, 2002
#### § 93.408 Performance reports.

Each grantee must develop and maintain a system to track the use of its HTF funds, and submit annual performance and management reports on its HTF program in accordance with 24 CFR 91.520. HUD will make the performance and management reports publicly available.
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being
prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles:c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation;
andd)
    
    disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 By:
    
    /s/ Edward W. Martin III

Edward W. Martin IIIChief Financial Officer and Treasurer of

American Casino & Entertainment
Properties LLCDate:
    
    March 27, 2009
### §2165. Limitation on jurisdiction and powers of court

Subject to the limitations set forth in subchapters I and II of this chapter, notwithstanding any power of the court, unless the Oversight Board consents or the plan so provides, the court may not, by any stay, order, or decree, in the case or otherwise, interfere with—

(1) any of the political or governmental powers of the debtor;

(2) any of the property or revenues of the debtor; or

(3) the use or enjoyment by the debtor of any income-producing property.

(Pub. L. 114–187, title III, §305, June 30, 2016, 130 Stat. 580.)
### SUBCHAPTER II—FEDERAL COORDINATION, PLANNING, AND REGULATION
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7329** 

ROGER DALE TERRY, JR. , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v.
M. MIDDLETON, Ofc, COS; BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden; SLATE STATE, Sgt, Rep; P. SHIELDS, D.O.C., Co2; FRED NASTRI, H.O. , Defendants

– Appellees , and

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; SCOTT OAKLEY, Executive Director of the IGO; J. L. TRUE, Captain; LENORA C. ADEGBESON , Defendants

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Ellen L

. Hollander , District Judge. ( 1:11

- cv
- 01686

- ELH )

Submitted : November 29, 2012 Decided: December 13, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Roger Dale Terry, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Nancy P. Tennis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Roger Dale Terry, Jr., appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Terry v. Middleton , No. 1:11

- cv
- 0 1686

- ELH (D. Md.

June 29, 2012) . We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before th is court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §1543. United States citizenship requirement for government officials

All members of the Legislature of the Virgin Islands, the Governor, the Lieutenant Governor, all judges and all officials of the government of the Virgin Islands who report directly to the Governor shall be citizens of the United States.

(July 22, 1954, ch. 558, §29, 68 Stat. 509; Pub. L. 98–213, §5(a), Dec. 8, 1983, 97 Stat. 1460.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1983—Pub. L. 98–213 amended section generally, substituting provisions requiring United States citizenship for all members of the Legislature of the Virgin Islands, the Governor, Lieutenant Governor and all officials who report directly to the Governor for provisions requiring such citizenship for all officers of the Virgin Islands, and struck out provisions requiring written oaths and prescribing the oath.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7835

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BARRY STANLEY WASHINGTON, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-92-296-WS, CA-98-549-1) Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 16, 1999 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Barry Stanley Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Barry Stanley Washington seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistratejudge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Washington , Nos. CR-92-296-WS; CA-98-549-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 30, 1998). We also deny Washington’s motion for the preparation of a transcript at government’s expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3440 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 29, 2006 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 100 Avenida RL Rodrı ́guez in Bayamo ́n, Puerto Rico, as the ‘‘Dr. Jose ́ Celso Barbosa Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

HR 3440 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 100 Avenida RL Rodrı ́guez in Bayamo ́n, Puerto 

4 Rico, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Dr. Jose ́

5 Celso Barbosa Post Office Building’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Dr. Jose ́ Celso Barbosa Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 28, 

2006. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
### §1456. Repealed. Sept. 12, 1950, ch. 946, title III, §301(106), 64 Stat. 844

Section, acts June 20, 1874, ch. 328, §1, 18 Stat. 99; June 10, 1921, ch. 18, §215, 42 Stat. 23, made it duty of secretary of each Territory to furnish annual estimates for expenses to Secretary of the Treasury.