alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNOx Emissions Characteristics and Correlation Equations of Two P and W's Axially Staged Sector Combustors Developed Under NASA Environmentally Responsible Aviation (ERA) ProjectTwo P&W (Pratt & Whitney)'s axially staged sector combustors have been developed under NASA's Environmentally Responsible Aviation (ERA) project. One combustor was developed under ERA Phase I, and the other was developed under ERA Phase II. Nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions characteristics and correlation equations for these two sector combustors are reported in this article. The Phase I design was to optimize the NOx emissions reduction potential, while the Phase II design was more practical and robust. Multiple injection points and fuel staging strategies are used in the combustor design. Pilot-stage injectors are located on the front dome plate of the combustor, and main-stage injectors are positioned on the top and bottom (Phase I) or on the top only (Phase II) of the combustor liners downstream. Low power configuration uses only pilot-stage injectors. Main-stage injectors are added to high power configuration to help distribute fuel more evenly and achieve lean burn throughout the combustor yielding very low NOx emissions. The ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization)  landing-takeoff NOx emissions are verified to be 88 percent (Phase I) and 76 percent (Phase II) under the ICAO CAEP/6 (Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection 6th Meeting) standard, exceeding the ERA project goal of 75 percent reduction, and the combustors proved to have stable combustion with room to maneuver on fuel flow splits for operability.Document ID20170000842Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHe, Zhuohui J.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredJanuary 26, 2017Publication DateJanuary 1, 2017Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerPropellants And FuelsReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2017-219381E-19289GRC-E-DAA-TN35044Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 081876.02.03.04.01.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Keywordssector combustor testcombustionNOx emissionsAvailable DownloadsNameType20170000842.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
PUBLIC MEETING TO CONSIDER ADOPTING THE PROPOSED RE GULATION FOR

COMMERCIAL HARBOR CRAFT

Staff’s Suggested Modifications to the Original Pro posal

TO BE PRESENTED AT THE NOVEMBER 15, 2007 HEARING

OF THE AIR RESOURCES BOARD

Shown below are the staff’s suggested modifications to the originally proposed regulatory text set forth in Appendix A to the Staf f Report: Initial Statement of Reasons released SEPTEMBER 7, 2007 as modified by those mod ifications presented at the October 26, 2007 hearing. All proposed modificatio ns will be made available to the public for a fifteen-day comment period prior to fi nal adoption.

Vessel Owners or Operators with Multiple Vessels Re quiring Repower in Either

2009 or 2010

The original proposal provides a one year complianc e extension for vessel owners or operators with multiple vessels requiring engine co mpliance in a single year. However, there are at least two fleets with a large number o f vessels with engines older than 1975 model year that would need to bring all of these ve ssels into compliance in the first two compliance years, 2009 and 2010. The compliance ex tension would only extend their compliance deadline for either of these dates by on e year. Staff proposes that a phased compliance schedule be provided for owners a nd operators with multiple vessels requiring compliance in either 2009 or 2010 . The phased compliance schedule would require that a portion of the fleet be repowe red each year and that all repowers be completed by 2013. This would allow up to four years for the repowers to be completed but would not jeopardize the early reduct ions necessary in the SCAQMD or the rest of California. (Section 93118.5(e)6(E) ti tle 17, chapter 1, subchapter 7.5 California Code of Regulations (CCR) and, section 2 299.5(e)6(E), title 13, chapter 5.1, CCR).

In-Use Engines and Vessels – Compliance Schedules f or 1996 – 1999 Model Year Ferry Engines:

The original proposal requires 1996 – 1999 model ye ar ferry engines, with home ports outside the SCAQMD, to comply with in-use engine re quirements by 2015 or 2016, depending on the annual engine hours of operation. The Board directed staff to accelerate the compliance schedule for these ferry engines to 2014. This modification would accelerate the emission reductions by one to two years while still replacing these ferry engines with Tier 3 engines and maintaining a t least a 15 year engine life for the original engines. (Section 93118.5(e)6(C) title 17 , chapter 1, subchapter 7.5 California Code of Regulations (CCR) and, section 2299.5(e)6(C ), title 13, chapter 5.1, CCR).
PERCENTAGECOUNTRY OF
    
    OWNERSHIPNAME
    
    INCORPORATION
    
    INTERESTFortune Software (Beijing) Co., Ltd
    
    China
    
    
    100China Finance Online (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
    
    China
    
    
    100Beijing Fuhua Innovation Technology Development Co., Ltd.*
    
    China
    
    
    100Stockstar Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd
    
    China
    
    
    100Shanghai Meining Computer Software Co., Ltd.
    
    China
    
    
    100Zhengning Information & Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
    
    China
    
    
    100Zhengtong Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd
    
    China
    
    
    100Zhengyong Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd
    
    China
    
    
    100Shenzhen Genius Information Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    China
    
    
    100Jujin Software (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
    
    China
    
    
    100Juda Software (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
    
    China
    
    
    100
 
 *
    
    Denotes variable interest entity
#### Joseph Alfieri, Appellant, v Lewis General Tires, Inc., et al., Respondents.

(Appeal No. 4.)

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Same memorandum as in *Alñeri v Lewis Gen. Tires*(62 AD2d 1135). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe Supreme Court—automobile negligence.) Present—Moule, J. P., Cardamone, Simons, Dillon and Hancock, Jr., JJ.
From: John Mietus

To: Finamore, Robert (OST) Subject: RE: Aeromar/Aeromexico 2002-20954

Date: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 1:47:11 PM



### Bob, Aeromexico has confirmed to me that the underlying code-share agreement has terminated. Thus, Aeromexico no longer seeks the renewal for which it applied in Docket OST-2005-20954 on
May 24, 2006.

Best regards, John

_________________________ John Mietus Law Office of John Mietus, LLC 6701 Democracy Blvd Ste 300 Bethesda, MD 20817-7500 (202) 747-5212 (240) 396-5362 fax john@mietuslaw.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information in this e-mail and any attachments may be privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not review, use, disclose, distribute or copy the information it contains; destroy this e-mail and notify the sender by reply e-mail or an e-mail to admin@mietuslaw.com

. Thanks.

From: Robert.Finamore@dot.gov [mailto:Robert.Finamore@dot.gov]
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 11:21 AM
To: John Mietus Subject: Aeromar/Aeromexico 2002-20954

Hi John,

Aeromar was granted exemption authority in the referenced docket for code-share operations with Aeromexico, and Aeromexico was granted a corresponding statement of authorization to display the Aeromar code on Aeromexico flights between Mexico City-Atlanta/Miami/Houston/New York (JFK), and there is also a pending renewal request for these services. Over time, we have dealt with that authority concurrently with Aeromar’s other authority in 1995-379. Aeromar recently filed a new request in 1995-379, and has notified us that it only wishes to renew its San Luis Potosi/Manzanillo-San Antonio authority and wants grant of new Saltillo-San Antonio authority that it was recently designated for as well as its charter authority. There are several other routes previously granted in the referenced dockets for which Aeromar no longer wants authority, to include the code-share authority it held with
Aeromexico. In light of Aeromar’s request that its code-share authority with Aeromexico not be renewed, I wanted to verify with you that Aeromexico’s pending request for renewal of its corresponding statement of authorization need not be renewed either.

Thanks,
Bob

Robert J. Finamore U.S. Department of TransportationOffice of International Aviation, X-45

Phone: (202) 366-2405
### §893. Salary of Commissioner; allowances; franking privilege

The Resident Commissioner shall receive a salary payable monthly by the United States. He shall be allowed the same sum for stationery and for the pay of necessary clerk hire as is allowed Members of the House of Representatives of the United States. He shall be allowed the franking privilege granted Members of Congress.

(Mar. 2, 1917, ch. 145, §36, 39 Stat. 963; Mar. 4, 1925, ch. 549, §4, 43 Stat. 1301.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of parts of third and fourth sentences of section 36 of act Mar. 2, 1917. For classification of the remainder of section 36, see Codification note set out under section 891 of this title.
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.1500 Definitions.

Terms used in this subpart have the following meaning:

*Contractor and contract personnel* mean anyone, other than an employee of the lessee, performing well control, deepwater well control, or production safety duties for the lessee.

*Deepwater well control* means well control when you are using a subsea BOP system.

*Employee* means direct employees of the lessees who are assigned well control, deepwater well control, or production safety duties.

*I or you* means the lessee engaged in oil, gas, or sulphur operations in the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS).

*Lessee* means a person who has entered into a lease with the United States to explore for, develop, and produce the leased minerals. The term lessee also includes an owner of operating rights for that lease and the BOEM-approved assignee of that lease.

*Periodic* means occurring or recurring at regular intervals. Each lessee must specify the intervals for periodic training and periodic assessment of training needs in their training programs.

*Production operations* include, but are not limited to, separation, dehydration, compression, sweetening, and metering operations.

*Production safety* includes measures, practices, procedures, and equipment to ensure safe, accident-free, and pollution-free production operations, as well as installation, repair, testing, maintenance, and operation of surface and subsurface safety equipment.

*Well completion/well workover* means those operations following the drilling of a well that are intended to establish or restore production.

*Well-control* means methods used to minimize the potential for the well to flow or kick and to maintain control of the well in the event of flow or a kick. Well-control applies to drilling, well-completion, well-workover, abandonment, and well-servicing operations. It includes measures, practices, procedures and equipment, such as fluid flow monitoring, to ensure safe and environmentally protective drilling, completion, abandonment, and workover operations as well as the installation, repair, maintenance, and operation of surface and subsea well-control equipment.

[76 FR 64462, Oct. 18, 2011, as amended at 77 FR 50896, Aug. 22, 2012]
---



##### 



ARTICLE 1. LOAN
    
    
    3ARTICLE 2. PAYMENT FOR THE LOAN
    
    
    3ARTICLE 3. TERM, REPAYMENT AND INTEREST OF THE LOAN
    
    
    3ARTICLE 4. CONFIDENTIALITY
    
    
    4ARTICLE 5. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
    
    
    4ARTICLE 6. EFFECTIVENESS
    
    
    5ARTICLE 7. AMENDMENT
    
    
    5ARTICLE 8. MISCELLANEOUS
    
    
    5




---



##### 



1.
    
    The Lender is a wholly foreign invested enterprise incorporated and existing under
the law of the Peoples Republic of China.2.
    
    The Borrower desires to invest in a Company in China (the Company) whose registered
capital will be RMB10,000,000. Linghai Ma will hold 82.5% of the equity interest in the
Company and the Borrower will hold 17.5% of the equity interest in the Company.3.
    
    The Borrower desires to borrow a loan (the Loan) from the Lender to invest in the
Company and the Lender agrees to provide the Loan to the Borrower.




---



##### 



(1)
    
    The Borrower deceases or becomes a person without legal capacity or with limited legal
capacity;(2)
    
    The Borrower commits a crime or are involved in a criminal act; or(3)
    
    The Lender or its designated assignee can legally purchase the Borrower shares in the
Company under the PRC law and the Lender chooses to do so.




---



##### 








---



##### 



FORTUNE SOFTWARE (BEIJING) CO., LTDSealAuthorized Representative:  LIN YANG(signature)
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.108 What requirements must I follow for cranes and other material-handling equipment? ( a ) All cranes installed on fixed platforms must be operated in accordance with American Petroleum Institute's Recommended Practice for Operation and Maintenance of Offshore Cranes, API RP 2D (as incorporated by reference in § 250.198).
( b ) All cranes installed on fixed platforms must be equipped with a functional anti-two block device.
( c ) If a fixed platform is installed after March 17, 2003, all cranes on the platform must meet the requirements of American Petroleum Institute Specification for Offshore Pedestal Mounted Cranes, API Spec 2C (as incorporated by reference in § 250.198).
( d ) All cranes manufactured after March 17, 2003, and installed on a fixed platform, must meet the requirements of API Spec 2C.
( e ) You must maintain records specific to a crane or the operation of a crane installed on an OCS fixed platform, as follows: ( 1 ) Retain all design and construction records, including installation records for any anti-two block safety devices, for the life of the crane. The records must be kept at the OCS fixed platform.
( 2 ) Retain all inspection, testing, and maintenance records of cranes for at least 4 years. The records must be kept at the OCS fixed platform.
( 3 ) Retain the qualification records of the crane operator and all rigger personnel for at least 4 years. The records must be kept at the OCS fixed platform.
( f ) You must operate and maintain all other material-handling equipment in a manner that ensures safe operations and prevents pollution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,696                   4,642
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,323                   5,012
<ALLOWANCES>                                       165                     179
<INVENTORY>                                      6,658                   7,557
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,232                  18,924
<PP&E>                                          76,612                  70,437
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,040                  33,044
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 271,967                 196,215
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,115                   8,273
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           30,000                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           128                     128
<OTHER-SE>                                     182,693                 177,471
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   271,967                 196,215
<SALES>                                         82,307                  79,937
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                83,538                  80,592
<CGS>                                           59,613                  50,309
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   64,894                  53,893
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,956                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 515                     258
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,055                  21,934
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,236                   8,644
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,819                  13,290
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,819                  13,290
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.40                    1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40                    1.04
        

</TABLE>
§ 51.303 General policy. It is HUD's general policy to apply standards to prevent incompatible development around civil airports and military airfields. ( a ) HUD policy for actions in Runway Clear Zones and Clear Zones. ( 1 ) HUD policy is not to provide any assistance, subsidy or insurance for projects and actions covered by this part except as stated in § 51.303(a)(2) below.
( 2 ) If a project proposed for HUD assistance, subsidy or insurance is one which will not be frequently used or occupied by people, HUD policy is to provide assistance, subsidy or insurance only when written assurances are provided to HUD by the airport operator to the effect that there are no plans to purchase the land involved with such facilities as part of a Runway Clear Zone or Clear Zone acquisition program.
( 3 ) Special notification requirements for Runway Clear Zones and Clear Zones. In all cases involving HUD assistance, subsidy, or insurance for the purchase or sale of an existing property in a Runway Clear Zone or Clear Zone, HUD (or the responsible entity or recipient under 24 CFR part 58) shall advise the buyer that the property is in a Runway Clear Zone or Clear Zone, what the implications of such a location are, and that there is a possibility that the property may, at a later date, be acquired by the airport operator. The buyer must sign a statement acknowledging receipt of this information.
( b ) HUD policy for actions in Accident Potential Zones at Military Airfields. HUD policy is to discourage the provision of any assistance, subsidy or insurance for projects and actions in the Accident Potential Zones. To be approved, projects must be generally consistent with the recommendations in the *Land Use Compatibility Guidelines For Accident Potential Zones* chart contained in DOD Instruction 4165.57, 32 CFR part 256.
[49 FR 880, Jan. 6, 1984, as amended at 61 FR 13334, Mar. 26, 1996]
DISMISS in Part and DENY in Part; and Opinion File May 23 , 2013. 

# S

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 13
- 00665
- CV IN RE ANDREW DAVID M ALONE JR. , Relator
On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F86
- 95910
- QN MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Francis, and Fillmore Opinion by Justice Fillmore The Court has before it relator’s petition for writ of man damus asking us to order the trial court to “immediately transmit to the Court of Criminal Appeals a copy of the motion ‘nunc pro tunc’ pre

- sentence jail time credits.” To the extent relator complains the trial court is not properly forwarding to the Cour t of Criminal Appeals documents related to his article 11.07 post

- conviction writ of habeas corpus, we conclude we do not have jurisdiction over the petition.
See T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P. A NN
. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2012); In re Hampton , No. 05

- 07

- 00440

- CV, 200 7 WL 1168446, at * 1 (Tex. App.

–– Dallas Apr. 20, 2007, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). To the extent relator is asking this Court to order the trial court to rule on his motion for a judgment nunc pro tunc awarding him additional back time credit, we conclu de the record does not show appellant is entitled to the relief sought. See Simon v. Levario , 306 S.W.3d 318, 320

– 21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009) (orig. proceeding); State of Tex. ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist. , 34 S.W.3d 924, 927

– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001) (orig. proceeding).– 2

– We dismiss in part and deny in part relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

130665F.P05 /Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE
### §§754 to 756. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–414, title III, §304(b)(5), Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4298

Section 754, Pub. L. 87–624, title V, §505, as added Pub. L. 95–564, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2395, related to study of structure and activities of corporation.

Section 755, Pub. L. 87–624, title V, §506, as added Pub. L. 95–564, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2395, related to study of public maritime coast station services.

Section 756, Pub. L. 87–624, title V, §507, as added Pub. L. 95–564, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2396, related to study of radio navigation systems.
Exhibit 32.2
                                  ------------


                     Commodore Separation Technologies, Inc.
                    Certification Of Chief Executive Officer
           Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Commodore Separation Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") on form 10-QSB for the three and six months ended June 30,
2004, Andrew Oddi hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of his knowledge:

         (1)  The annual report fully complies with the  requirements of section
              13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in
              all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of
              operations of the Company.

Date:    May 11, 2004


/s/ Andrew Oddi
---------------
/s/ Andrew Oddi
President and Chief Financial Officer