alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.9


 


AMENDMENT TO EXCHANGE AGREEMENT


 


 


This Amendment to Exchange
Agreement (the “First Amendment”) is made as of this 15th day of November 2022 by and between Wytec International, Inc., a
Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and William H. Gray, an individual (“Gray”), with respect to the following
facts:


 


RECITALS


 


		A.	The Company and Gray have entered into that certain exchange agreement, dated October 6, 2022 (the “Agreement”),
pursuant to which Gray agreed to exchange 1,000 shares of the Company’s Series C Preferred Stock for 3,000,000 shares of the Company’s
common stock (the “Exchange”).



 


		B.	As of the date of this Amendment, the Exchange has not been closed nor effected in any other manner.



 


		C.	The Company and Gray desire to amend the Agreement as provided in this First Amendment in order to amend
the closing date of the Exchange.



 


		D.	The terms used in this First Amendment will have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement unless
otherwise defined herein.



 


NOW,
THEREFORE, for one dollar and other good and valuable consideration, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE
AS FOLLOWS:


 


		1.	Amendment.


 







Section 1 of the Agreement
is hereby amended and restated as follows:


 


“Effective on the
earlier of (i) the effective date of the initial public offering of the Company’s common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Markets or
(ii) October 6, 2025, with the closing of the Exchange deemed to be effective on such date (the “Closing”), Gray will tender
the Series C Shares to the Company for cancellation in consideration for the issuance to Gray of 3,000,000 Shares. The Shares will be
subject to the conditions of Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), with respect to their
transferability, unless and until they are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission.”


 


		2.	Effect of First Amendment.



 


The Agreement will remain
in full force and effect except as specifically modified by this First Amendment. In the event of any conflict between the First Amendment
and the Agreement, the terms of this First Amendment will govern.


 


		3.	Counterparts.



 


This First Amendment may
be executed simultaneously in any number of counterparts, each of which counterparts will be deemed to be an original and such counterparts
will constitute but one and the same instrument.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
this First Amendment is executed as of the date first above written.


 





	COMPANY: WYTEC INTERNATIONAL, INC.	 	GRAY
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ William H. Gray	 	/s/ William H. Gray
	 	William H. Gray, Chief Executive
Officer	 	William H. Gray
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Erica Perez	 	 
	 	Erica Perez, Corporate Secretary
§ 945.201 Approval to designate housing. ( a ) *Designated housing for elderly families.* To designate a project for occupancy by elderly families, a PHA must have a HUD-approved allocation plan that meets the requirements of § 945.203.
( b ) *Designated housing for disabled families.* To designate a project for occupancy by disabled families, a PHA must have a HUD-approved allocation plan that meets the requirements of § 945.203, and a HUD-approved supportive service plan that meets the requirements of § 945.205.
( c ) *Designated housing for elderly families and disabled families.* ( 1 ) A PHA that provides or intends to provide a mixed population project (a project for both elderly families *and* disabled families) is not required to meet the requirements of this part. The PHA is required to meet the requirements of 24 CFR part 960, subpart D.
( 2 ) A PHA that intends to provide designated housing for elderly families or for disabled families must identify any existing or planned mixed population projects, reserved under 24 CFR part 960, subpart B, as additional housing resources, in its allocation plan, in accordance with § 945.203(c)(6).
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth
below is being submitted in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a14(b) or Rule 15d14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Ray C. Dillon, the Chief Executive Officer, and Clefton D. Vaughan, the Chief Financial Officer, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Deltic Timber Corporation.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/Ray C. DillonRay C. DillonChief Executive OfficerOctober 29, 2003/s/Clefton D. VaughanClefton D. VaughanChief Financial OfficerOctober 29, 2003
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KEVIN M. JONES; CHERYL A. JONES, 

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 v.

CITIMORTGAGE INC., a business entity; 

CAL-WESTERN RECONVEYANCE 

CORPORATION, a business entity, 

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 13-15976

D.C. No. 1:12-cv-02067-LJO-SMS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence J. O'Neill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 10, 2015**

San Francisco, California

Before: SILVERMAN, GOULD, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Kevin and Cheryl Jones appeal the district court’s dismissal of their first 

amended complaint (“FAC”) against CitiMortgage, Inc. (“Citi”), and Cal-Western 

 

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 12 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Reconveyance Corporation, asserting various claims arising out of a home loan 

modification. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm.

1. The FAC did not state claims for either fraud or negligent 

misrepresentation because it did not plausibly allege that Citi materially 

misrepresented the monthly payment due under the modification agreement or that 

the plaintiffs justifiably relied on any misrepresentation. See Davis v. HSBC Bank 

Nev., N.A., 691 F.3d 1152, 1163 (9th Cir. 2012); Fox v. Pollack, 226 Cal. Rptr. 532, 

537 (Ct. App. 1986).

2. The FAC did not state a claim under the California Unfair Competition 

Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 et seq., because it failed to plausibly allege 

that Citi violated any other laws, see Levitt v. Yelp! Inc., 765 F.3d 1123, 1130 (9th 

Cir. 2014), or engaged in fraudulent or unfair business practices, see Davis, 691 F.3d 

at 1169-70; Cel-Tech Comms., Inc. v. L.A. Cellular Tel. Co., 973 P.2d 527, 544 (Cal. 

1999).

3. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to file a 

second amended complaint after concluding further amendment would be futile. 

See Allen v. City of Beverly Hills, 911 F.2d 367, 373-74 (9th Cir. 1990).

AFFIRMED.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

69–006 WASHINGTON :

" ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

114TH CONGRESS

2d Session 

REPORT

2016

114–891

Union Calendar No. 701 

REVIEW OF THE UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURES OF 

FORMER NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY CONTRACTOR EDWARD SNOWDEN 

BY THE

HOUSE PERMANENT SELECT COMMITTEE 

ON INTELLIGENCE 

FOR THE

ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS 

DECEMBER 23, 2016.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House 

on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed 

(III)

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,

PERMANENT SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE,

Washington, DC, December 23, 2016. 

Hon. KAREN HAAS,

Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MRS. HAAS: I present herewith a declassified report entitled ‘‘Review of the Unauthorized Disclosures of Former National 

Security Agency Contractor Edward Snowden.’’ 

Sincerely,

DEVIN NUNES,

Chairman.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3425 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require mandatory HIV testing 

of potential sources in the event of possible occupational exposure to 

HIV in a Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2005 

Mr. TANCREDO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require mandatory 

HIV testing of potential sources in the event of possible 

occupational exposure to HIV in a Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Health Ad5 ministration Employee Protection Act’’. 
2 

•HR 3425 IH 

1 SEC. 2. MANDATORY HIV TESTING OF POTENTIAL SOURCES 

2 IN THE EVENT OF POSSIBLE OCCUPATIONAL 

3 EXPOSURE TO HIV IN A DEPARTMENT OF 

4 VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL FACILITY. 

5 (a) MANDATORY TESTING.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 74 of title 38, 

7 United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

8 end the following new subchapter: 

9 ‘‘SUBCHAPTER VII—OTHER MATTERS 

10 ‘‘§ 7481. Occupational exposures to HIV: mandatory 

11 testing of potential sources 

12 ‘‘(a) TESTING REQUIRED.—Whenever an employee of 

13 the Department of Veterans Affairs incurs in an occupa14 tional setting a possible exposure to the human immuno15 deficiency virus, the Secretary shall test for that virus the 

16 person who is the source (or potential source) of the expo17 sure. 

18 ‘‘(b) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary shall prescribe 

19 such regulations as required for purposes of this section. 

20 The Secretary may require in such regulations that con21 sent to testing under subsection (a) shall be— 

22 ‘‘(1) a condition of the receipt by any person of 

23 medical care and services provided by the Depart24 ment; and 

25 ‘‘(2) a condition of employment of any person 

26 by the Department.’’. 
3 

•HR 3425 IH 

1 (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sec2 tions at the beginning of such chapter is amended 

3 by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘SUBCHAPTER VII—OTHER MATTERS

‘‘7481. Occupational exposures to HIV: mandatory testing of potential 

sources.’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Section 7481 of title 38, 

5 United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall take 

6 effect on October 1, 2005. 

Æ
### §8904. Towing vessels

(a) A towing vessel that is at least 26 feet in length measured from end to end over the deck (excluding sheer), shall be operated by an individual licensed by the Secretary to operate that type of vessel in the particular geographic area, under prescribed regulations.

(b) A vessel that tows a disabled vessel for consideration shall be operated by an individual licensed by the Secretary to operate that type of vessel in the particular geographic area, under prescribed regulations.

(c) The Secretary may prescribe by regulation requirements for maximum hours of service (including recording and recordkeeping of that service) of individuals engaged on a towing vessel that is at least 26 feet in length measured from end to end over the deck (excluding the sheer).

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 555; Pub. L. 99–640, §12(a), Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3550; Pub. L. 108–293, title IV, §409(a), Aug. 9, 2004, 118 Stat. 1044.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 8904 | 46:405(b)(2) |

Section 8904 requires that a 26-foot or larger towing vessel be operated by a licensed individual for that type of vessel and for a particular geographic area.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2004—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 108–293 added subsec. (c).

1986—Pub. L. 99–640 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

Pub. L. 99–640, §12(b), Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3551, provided that: "The amendments made by subsection (a) of this section [amending this section] shall take effect on January 1, 1988."

#### Demonstration Project

Pub. L. 108–293, title IV, §409(b), Aug. 9, 2004, 118 Stat. 1045, provided that: "Prior to prescribing regulations under this section [amending this section] the Secretary shall conduct and report to the Congress on the results of a demonstration project involving the implementation of Crew Endurance Management Systems on towing vessels. The report shall include a description of the public and private sector resources needed to enable implementation of Crew Endurance Management Systems on all United States-flag towing vessels."
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Antonia Bold-de-Haughton, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Douglas Lake Minerals Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|Date:  September 5, 2006 | /s/ Antonia Bold-de-Haughton
Antonia Bold-de-Haughton 
Chief Financial Officer
|------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") of Pinnacle Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certifies that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in
                  the Report.



/s/ Robert B. Nolen, Jr.
-----------------------------------------------------
Robert B. Nolen, Jr, Chief Executive Officer and
 Chief Financial Officer



May 15, 2003
-----------------------------------------------------
(Date)



         A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The
information furnished herein shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed
incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
Exhibit 18

August 5, 2009

Deltic Timber Corporation

El
Dorado, Arkansas

Dear Gentlemen:

We have been furnished
with a copy of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Deltic Timber Corporation (the Company) for the three months ended June 30, 2009, and have read the Companys statements contained in Note 1 and Note 15 to the consolidated
financial statements included therein. As stated in Note 1 and Note 15, the Company changed its method of accounting for the classification of cash outflows associated with real estate development capital expenditures from investing activities to
operating activities within the consolidated statement of cash flows and states that the newly adopted accounting principle is preferable in the circumstances because the Company believes that cash inflows and cash outflows related to real estate
assets held for sale should be classified in a consistent manner and that classification within operating activities better reflects the fact that these cash outflows are directly related to the Companys operations of developing and selling
real estate. In accordance with your request, we have reviewed and discussed with Company officials the circumstances and business judgment and planning upon which the decision to make this change in the method of accounting was based.

We have not audited any financial statements of the Company as of any date or for any period subsequent to December 31, 2008, nor have we audited the information
set forth in the aforementioned Note 1 and Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements; accordingly, we do not express an opinion concerning the factual information contained therein.

With regard to the aforementioned accounting change, authoritative criteria have not been established for evaluating the preferability of one acceptable method of
accounting over another acceptable method. However, for the purposes of the Companys compliance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we are furnishing this letter.

Based on our review and discussion, with reliance on managements business judgment and planning, we concur that the newly adopted method of accounting is
preferable in the Companys circumstances.



|                     
|---------------------
|Very truly yours,    
|                     
|/s/ KPMG LLP         
|                     
|KPMG LLP             
|Shreveport, Louisiana
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3414 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3414

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain refracting and reflecting 
                              telescopes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2005

 Mr. Gary G. Miller of California introduced the following bill; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain refracting and reflecting 
                              telescopes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN REFRACTING AND REFLECTING TELESCOPES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.90.05      Refracting          Free         Free             No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         telescopes with                                                    31/2010
                         50 mm or smaller
                         lenses and
                         reflecting
                         telescopes with
                         76 mm or smaller
                         lenses, and parts
                         and accessories
                         thereof (provided
                         for in subheading
                         9005.80.40)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York v. Ralph Polizzano.

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted insofar as to permit-the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points upon the District Attorney, New York County, and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of appellant’s points, together with the original record, with this court and on the further condition that the appeal be perfected and noticed for argument for a term on or before the March 1961 Term of this court. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens and Eager, JJ.