alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 972.109 Conversion of developments. ( a ) ( 1 ) The PHA may proceed to convert the development covered by a conversion plan after receiving written approval from HUD. This approval will be separate from the approval that the PHA receives for its Annual Plan.
( 2 ) HUD anticipates that its review of a conversion plan will ordinarily occur within 90 days following submission of a complete plan by the PHA. A longer process may be required where HUD's initial review of the plan raises questions that require further discussion with the PHA. In any event, HUD will provide all PHAs with a preliminary response within 90 days following submission of a conversion plan.
( b ) The PHA may not demolish or dispose of units or property until completion of the required environmental review under part 58 of this title (if a responsible entity has assumed environmental responsibility for the project) or part 50 of this title (if HUD is performing the environmental review). Further, HUD will not approve a conversion plan until completion of the required environmental review. However, before completion of the environmental review, HUD may approve the targeted units for removal from the PHA's inventory and may authorize the PHA to undertake other activities proposed in its conversion plan that do not require environmental review (such as certain activities related to the relocation of residents), as long as the buildings in question are adequately secured and maintained.
( c ) For purposes of determining operating subsidy eligibility, HUD will consider the conversion plan the PHA submits to be the equivalent of a formal request to remove dwelling units from the PHA's inventory and ACC. HUD will notify the PHA in writing whether it has approved the conversion plan. Units that are vacant or vacated on or after the written notification date will be treated as approved for deprogramming under § 990.108(b)(1) of this title and also will be provided any phase-down of subsidy to which the PHA is entitled pursuant to § 990.114 of this title.
( d ) The PHA may apply for tenant-based assistance in accordance with Section 8 program requirements, and HUD will give the PHA a priority for receiving tenant-based assistance to replace the public housing units. It is HUD's policy to provide funds for one-for-one replacement housing with either public housing or tenant-based assistance, if funds are available. HUD may require that funding for the initial year be provided from the public housing Capital Fund, Operating Fund, or both.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 15, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-20816

Summary Calendar

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DONNA ADAMS,

Defendant-Appellant,

ROBERT HEDRICK,

Intervenor DefendantAppellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:05-CV-1974

--------------------

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellee’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction appeal

of district court’s remand order and ostensible appeals of any

other orders, other than that granting Appellee’s motion for

sanctions and statutory fees, is GRANTED. See 28 U.S.C. §

1447(d); see also Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Mottley, 211

U.S. 149, 150-53 (1908) (plaintiff, not defendant, controls
No. 05-20816

-2-

removability of case); Sitton v. United States, 413 F.2d 1386,

1389 (5th Cir. 1969) (federal courts do not act as appellate arm

of state courts).

The district court’s sanctions order against Appellants,

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, which granted nonmonetary relief and, based on fees incurred by Appellee during

its two prior successful remands, $10,750, was not an abuse of

discretion and is AFFIRMED. See Skidmore Energy, Inc. v. KPMG,

455 F.3d 564, 566 (5th Cir. 2006). To the extent Appellants

appeal the court’s award of $7,031.25 in statutory fees under 28

U.S.C. § 1447(c), that award was also not an abuse of discretion

and is AFFIRMED. See Hornbuckle v. State Farm Lloyds, 385 F.3d

538, 541 (5th Cir. 2004).

Appellee’s motion for costs on appeal and motion, pursuant

to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 38, for damages in the

amount of fees incurred in defending this appeal are GRANTED and

the matter REMANDED to the district court for determination of

such (single) costs and fees incurred in defending this appeal.

See Lyons v. Sheetz, 834 F.2d 493, 495-96 (5th Cir. 1987); Clark

v. Green, 814 F.2d 221, 223 (5th Cir. 1987) (explaining that even

pro se litigants lack “unrestrained license to pursue totally

frivolous appeals”).

Appellants’ motion for $20,000 in sanctions against

Appellee, motion to turn the appeal over to the FBI for

investigation of allegations of conspiracy between employees of
No. 05-20816

-3-

this Court and Appellee, and motion to continue all actions

pending the outcome of that investigation are DENIED.

Finally, we warn Appellants that additional frivolous

pleadings, suits, or appeals filed by them in this matter will

invite further sanctions. It is time for the underlying case to

proceed in state court.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
DreamWorks Animation SKG, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned
officers of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                                                       
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 24, 2009 |  | /s/    JEFFREY
KATZENBERG                             
|                         |  | Jeffrey Katzenberg Chief Executive Officer            
|                         | 
|Dated: February 24, 2009 |  | /s/    LEWIS W.
COLEMAN                               
|                         |  | Lewis W. Coleman President and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CHLORINE CRITERIA : Total residual chlorine:

2.0 

### : g/l for salmonid fish; 10.0 

### : g/l for other freshwater and marine organisms
INTRODUCTION : Elemental chlorine is a greenish-yellow gas that is highly soluble in water. It reacts readily with many inorganic substances and all animal and plant tissues. The denaturing effect of chlorineon animal and plant tissues forms the basis for its use as an effective water or wastewater disinfectant. When chlorine dissolves in water, it hydrolyzes according to the reaction: Cl 2 + H 2 O 6 HOCl + H ++Cl - . Unless the concentration of the chlorine solution is above 1000 mg/l, all chlorine will be in the form of HOCl or its dissociated ions H +and OCL - . The HOCl is a weak acid and is dissociated according to the equation, HOCl W H ++ OCl -
. The ratio between HOCl and OCl - is a function of the pH, with 96 percent HOCl remaining at pH 6, 75 percent at pH 7, 22 percent at pH 8, and 3 percent at pH 9. The relationship of HOCl to pH is significant as the undissociated form appears to be the bactericidal agent in the use of chlorine for disinfection (Moore, 1951).
Chlorine is not a natural constituent of water. Free available chlorine (HOCl and OCl - ) and combined available chlorine (mono- and

61
#### § 887.103 Definitions.

The definitions in § 984.103 of this title apply to this part, except that *eligible families* means tenant families living in multifamily assisted housing.
VIA Electronic iling 

U. S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., 

SE Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Petition for Amendment 

Rotor Air Cam, LLC 

Exemption Number: 11995 

Docket Number: 2015-1230 

Dear Sir/Madam: Pursuant to Section 333 ofthe FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012 (the Reform 

Act) and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Rotor Air Cam, LLC ("Rotor") respectfully applies for 

an amendment to its current UAS Exemption (No. 11995) and COA. 

The sole purpose of this amendment is to add three new UAS systems to 

Rotor Air Cam LLC' s fleet, specifically: 

• The DJI Matrice 1 00; • The Phantom 3; and • The Spreading Wings S 1000 

All three of the proposed UAS systems have a maximum operating weight well within the SU AS category, specifically: 

System Manuf. Max. Operating Weight 

Phantom 3 1280 Grams/approx.2.9lbs 

Spreading Wings S 1000 11 Kg./approx.24.271 bs 

DJI Matrice 1 00 3400 Grams/approx. 7 .5lbs 

A review of recent UAS Exemptions identified the following approved 

operators of the above vehicles. 
Dronair Productions LLC 2015-4409/13990 DJI Spreading Wings S1000 

SkyCentric LLC 2015-4341/13939 DJI Spreading Wings S1 000 

Flyboy Aerial 2015-4335/13942 DJI Spreading Wings S1000 

Photography LLC 

Biosensing Systems 20 15-0700/11646A DJI Mat rice 100 

ET AK Systems 20 14-0918/1267C DJI Matrice 100 

Conclusion 

As you are aware, amendments are routinely granted to current operators wishing to operate 

within an existing Exemption with additional SUAS systems (e.g., Docket 2014-1018; 

Exemption No. 11307 A). 

Accordingly, Rotor Air Cam, LLC respectfully requests that its current Exemption 

(No.11995) and associated COA be amended to include the three light UAS systems listed at 

page 1. 

Thank you for your time and consideration. 

~ 

Counsel to Rotor Air Cam LLC 

Alimonti Law Offices, PC 

200 Mamaroneck A venue 

White Plains, New York 10601 

(914) 948-8044 

fpa@alony.com 

P.S. Copies of the S 1000 operator's manual accompanies this electronic petition. The others were 

too large for the portal and will gladly be provided as hard copies if requested.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                             395
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,658,412
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,658,412
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          807,335
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           163
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,850,914
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,658,412
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  427,391
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (226,744)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (226,744)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (226,744)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT      32**

**Certificate      Of Chief Executive Officer And Acting Chief Financial      Officer**

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.      1350)**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                 |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/                Michael A. Grollman                                                                                               |   |   |   |
| Michael                A. GrollmanChairman,                Chief Executive Officer,and                Acting Chief Financial Officer |   |   |   |

----
EXHIBIT
31.1


SECTION
302 CERTIFICATION





I,
Michael S. Wasik, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10−QSB of RoomLinX, Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report.





4. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a−15(e) and 15d−15(e) for the small business issuer and
have:





(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the small business
issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;





(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and





(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.





Date:
7/1/08





By:    /s/ Michael S.
Wasik


Michael S. Wasik


Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 121 (Monday, June 24, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 37797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15197]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:  Commodity Futures Trading Commission

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Friday, July 26, 2013.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance, Examinations, and Enforcement 
Matters. In the event that the time, date, or place of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site at 
http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Melissa D. Jurgens, 202-418-5516.

Natise Stowe,
Executive Assistant.
[FR Doc. 2013-15197 Filed 6-20-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



I, John S. Buchanan, Chief Financial Officer of Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT
Trust (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which this
certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.



Date: March 30, 2005



By:

/S/ JOHN S. BUCHANANJohn S. BuchananChief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust and will be retained by Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
### §1986. Agreements with and other provisions related to the Republic of Palau

#### (a) Bilateral economic consultations

United States participation in the annual economic consultations referred to in Article 8 of the 2023 U.S.-Palau Compact Review Agreement shall be by officers or employees of the Federal Government.

#### (b) Economic Advisory Group

#### (1) Qualifications

A member of the Economic Advisory Group described in Article 7 of the 2023 U.S.-Palau Compact Review Agreement (referred to in this subsection as the "Advisory Group") who is appointed by the Secretary of the Interior shall be an individual who, by reason of knowledge, experience, or training, is especially qualified in private sector business development, economic development, or national development.

#### (2) Funds

With respect to the Advisory Group, the Secretary of the Interior may use available funds for—

(A) the costs of the 2 members of the Advisory Group designated by the United States in accordance with Article 7 of the 2023 U.S.-Palau Compact Review Agreement;

(B) 50 percent of the costs of the 5th member of the Advisory Group designated by the Secretary of the Interior in accordance with the Article described in subparagraph (A); and

(C) the costs of—

(i) technical and administrative assistance for the Advisory Group; and

(ii) other support necessary for the Advisory Group to accomplish the purpose of the Advisory Group.

#### (3) Reports to Congress

Not later than 90 days after the date on which the Advisory Group receives or completes any report required under the 2023 U.S.-Palau Compact Review Agreement, or any related subsidiary agreement, the Secretary of the Interior shall submit the report to the appropriate committees of Congress.

#### (c) Reports to Congress

#### (1) In general

Not later than 90 days after the date on which the Government of the Republic of Palau completes any report required under the 2023 U.S.-Palau Compact Review Agreement, or any related subsidiary agreement, the Secretary of the Interior shall submit the report to the appropriate committees of Congress.

#### (2) Notice to Congress

Not later than 90 days after the date on which the Government of the Republic of Palau submits a report required under the 2023 U.S.-Palau Compact Review Agreement, or any related subsidiary agreement, the Secretary of the Interior shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress—

(A) if the report is submitted by the applicable deadline, written notice attesting that the report is complete and accurate; or

(B) if the report is not submitted by the applicable deadline, written notice that the report has not been timely submitted.

(Pub. L. 118–42, div. G, title II, §207, Mar. 9, 2024, 138 Stat. 433.)
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of FCStone Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert V. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                                          
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------
|By: |  | /S/    ROBERT V.
JOHNSON                 
|    |  | Robert V. Johnson Chief Financial Officer



Date:
November 29, 2005



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.