alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2 

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Bruce D. Horn, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Oplink Communications, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financing reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 12, 2003
### §53412. Acquisition of Fleet vessels

(a) In General.—Upon replacement of a Fleet vessel under an operating agreement under this chapter, and subject to agreement by the program participant of the vessel, the Secretary of Transportation is authorized, subject to the concurrence of the Secretary of Defense, acquire the vessel being replaced for inclusion in the National Defense Reserve Fleet.

(b) Requirements.—To be eligible for acquisition by the Secretary of Transportation under this section a vessel shall—

(1) have been covered by an operating agreement under this chapter for not less than 3 years; and

(2) meet recapitalization requirements for the Ready Reserve Force.

(c) Fair Market Value.—A fair market value shall be established by the Maritime Administration for acquisition of an eligible vessel under this section.

(d) Appropriations.—Vessel acquisitions under this section shall be subject to the availability of appropriations. Amounts made available to carry out this section shall be derived from amounts authorized to be appropriated for the National Defense Reserve Fleet. Amounts authorized to be appropriated to carry out the Maritime Security Program may not be use to carry out this section.

(Added Pub. L. 116–283, div. C, title XXXV, §3511(a), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4418.)
### §70302. International measures for seaport and vessel security

Congress encourages the President to continue to seek agreement on international seaport and vessel security through the International Maritime Organization. In developing an agreement, each member country of the International Maritime Organization should consult with appropriate private sector interests in that country. The agreement would establish seaport and vessel security measures and could include—

(1) seaport screening of cargo and baggage similar to that done at airports;

(2) security measures to restrict access to cargo, vessels, and dockside property to authorized personnel only;

(3) additional security on board vessels;

(4) licensing or certification of compliance with appropriate security standards; and

(5) other appropriate measures to prevent unlawful acts against passengers and crews on vessels.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §10(2), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1683.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 70302 | 46 App.:1801. | Pub. L. 99–399, title IX, §902, Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 889. |

Section

The word "vessel" is substituted for "shipboard" for consistency in the revised title. The words "and commends him on his efforts to date" are omitted as unnecessary.
Exhibit
99.2

Report on Financial Statement Schedule of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the
Supervisory Board Celanese AG:

Under date of March 30,
2005, we reported on the consolidated balance sheet of Celanese AG and
subsidiaries ("Predecessor") as of December
31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the three-month period
ended March 31, 2004 and the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002. In
connection with our audits of the aforementioned consolidated financial
statements, we also audited the accompanying related consolidated
financial statement schedule. This financial statement schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our
audits.

In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements
taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the
information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note 4 to the
consolidated financial statements, Celanese AG and subsidiaries changed
from using the last-in, first-out or LIFO method of determining cost of
inventories at certain locations to the first-in, first-out or FIFO
method.

As discussed in Note 5 to the consolidated financial
statements, Celanese AG and subsidiaries adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 143,
"Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations", effective January 1, 2003.

As
discussed in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements, Celanese
AG and subsidiaries adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board
Interpretation No. 46 (Revised), "Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities—an interpretation of ARB No.
51", effective December 31, 2003.

As discussed in
Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements, Celanese AG and
subsidiaries adopted SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets", effective January 1, 2002.

As
discussed in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements, Celanese
AG and subsidiaries have early adopted SFAS No. 146,
"Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities", effective October 1, 2002.

As
discussed in Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements, Celanese
AG and subsidiaries changed the actuarial measurement date for its
Canadian and U.S. pension and other postretirement benefit plans in
2003 and 2002, respectively.

We also have reported separately on
the consolidated financial statements and the related financial
statement schedule of Celanese AG and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2003 and for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002. Those
financial statements were presented using the euro as the reporting
currency.

/s/ KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft
Aktiengesellschaft WirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaftFrankfurt
am Main, Germany

March 30,
2005

---
Editorial Note on Part 1206
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1206 (formerly part 206) appear at 67 FR 19111, Apr. 18, 2002.

§ 1206.455 Valuation standards for cents-per-ton leases. ( a ) This section is applicable to coal leases on Indian Tribal and allotted Indian lands (except leases on the Osage Indian Reservation, Osage County, Oklahoma) which provide for the determination of royalty on a cents-per-ton (or other quantity) basis.
( b ) The royalty for coal from leases subject to this section shall be based on the dollar rate per ton prescribed in the lease. That dollar rate shall be applicable to the actual quantity of coal used, sold, or otherwise finally disposed of, including coal which is avoidably lost as determined by BLM pursuant to 43 CFR part 3400.
( c ) For leases subject to this section, there shall be no allowances for transportation, removal of impurities, coal washing, or any other processing or preparation of the coal.
( d ) When a coal lease is readjusted pursuant to 43 CFR part 3400 and the royalty valuation method changes from a cents-per-ton basis to an ad valorem basis, coal which is produced prior to the effective date of readjustment and sold or used within 30 days of the effective date of readjustment shall be valued pursuant to this section. All coal that is not used, sold, or otherwise finally disposed of within 30 days after the effective date of readjustment shall be valued pursuant to the provisions of § 1206.456, and royalties shall be paid at the royalty rate specified in the readjusted lease.
§ 880.501 The contract. ( a ) *Contract.* The Housing Assistance Payments Contract sets forth rights and duties of the owner and the contract administrator with respect to the project and the housing assistance payments. The owner and contract administrator execute the Contract in the form prescribed by HUD upon satisfactory completion of the project.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Housing Assistance Payments to Owners under the Contract.* The housing assistance payments made under the Contract are: ( 1 ) Payments to the owner to assist eligible families leasing assisted units, and
( 2 ) Payments to the owner for vacant assisted units (“vacancy payments”) if the conditions specified in § 880.610 are satisfied. The housing assistance payments are made monthly by the contract administrator upon proper requisition by the owner, except payments for vacancies of more than 60 days, which are made semi-annually by the contract administrator upon requisition by the owner.
( d ) *Amount of Housing Assistance Payments to Owner.* ( 1 ) The amount of the housing assistance payment made to the owner of a unit being leased by an eligible family is the difference between the contract rent for the unit and the tenant rent payable by the family.
( 2 ) A housing assistance payment will be made to the owner for a vacant assisted unit in an amount equal to 80 percent of the contract rent for the first 60 days of vacancy, subject to the conditions in § 880.611. If the owner collects any tenant rent or other amount for this period which, when added to this vacancy payment, exceeds the contract rent, the excess must be repaid as HUD directs.
( 3 ) For a vacancy that exceeds 60 days, a housing assistance payment for the vacant unit will be made, subject to the conditions in § 880.611, in an amount equal to the principal and interest payments required to amortize that portion of the debt attributable to the vacant unit for up to 12 additional months.
( e ) *Payment of utility reimbursement.* Where applicable, the owner will pay a utility reimbursement in accordance with § 5.632 of this title. HUD will provide funds for the utility reimbursement to the owner in trust solely for the purpose of paying the utility reimbursement.
[44 FR 59410, Oct. 15, 1979, as amended at 49 FR 19943, May 10, 1984; 61 FR 13587, Mar. 27, 1996; 65 FR 16722, Mar. 29, 2000]
#### JOHNSON v. MANNING.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 6, 1903.)

1. Appeal — Order Opening Default — Municipal Court Act.

The right *of*a plaintiff to appeal from an order of a justice of the' municipal court opening a default and setting aside his judgment, which was abrogated by the municipal court act (Laws 1902, c. 5S0, § 257), was preserved as to pending causes at the time the act took effect by section 361 thereof, providing that the repeal of any law by such act should not impair or affect any rights previously existing, and that all actions commenced under laws so repealed might be prosecuted under such laws.

2. Same — Order Appealed from — Recital of Grounds.

Where a municipal court order opening a default and setting aside a judgment thereon did not contain a recital of the grounds on which it was granted, as required by Consolidation Act, § 1367, it was invalid.

Appeal from municipal court, borough of Brooklyn.

Action by Christina Johnson against John J. Manning. From an order of a justice of the municipal court vacating a judgment against defendant, plaintiff appeals.

Reversed.

Argued before GOODRICH, P. J., and BARTLETT, JENKS, WOODWARD, HIRSCHBERG, and HOOKER, JJ.

George Gru, for appellant.

James T. O’Neill, for respondent.

JENICS, J.

The petition of the defendant shows that the judgment was recovered upon default. Under the present practice such an appeal in the first instance would not lie. Section 257, Municipal Court Act (chapter 580, Laws 1902). But at the time this action was begun, and when the judgment was obtained, the plaintiff had the right of appeal from an order opening the default and setting aside his judgment. Beebe v. Nassau Show Case Co., 41 App. Div. 456, 58 N. Y. Supp. 769. I think that this right was preserved in this case by section *739361 of the municipal court act. Without passing upon the various objections raised to the practice of the respondent, I think that there is one which is fatal. Section 1367 of the consolidation act (Laws 1882, c. 410; now repealed by the present municipal court act) provides that the order should recite the grounds upon which it was granted. I think that this requirement was substantial for the purpose of apprising the Appellate Court of the grounds of the decision brought up for review. As the present order fails to recite and to contain the grounds for it, I advise that it be reversed, unless within 10 days the respondent procure an amendment to the order.

Order of the municipal court reversed in accordance with the opinion of JENKS, J. All concur.
Exhibit 13.1

                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In  connection  with  this  Annual  Report  of TOP  Tankers  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 20-F for the year ended  December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I,  Evangelos  Pistiolis,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

         A signed  original of this written  statement  has been provided to the
Company and will be retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Date: June 28, 2005

/s/ Evangelos Pistiolis
-----------------------
Chief Executive Officer
```

[110th Congress Public Law 148]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ148.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 1818]]

Public Law 110-148
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the Arizona Water Settlements Act to modify the requirements 
 for the statement of findings. <<NOTE: Dec. 21, 2007 -  [H.R. 3739]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. MODIFICATION TO REQUIREMENTS FOR STATEMENT OF FINDINGS.

    Section 302 of the Arizona Water Settlements Act (Public Law 108-
451; 118 Stat. 3571) is amended as follows:
            (1) In subsection (b)(5), by striking ``proceedings,'' and 
        all that follows through the end of the paragraph and inserting 
        ``proceedings;''.
            (2) In subsection (c), by striking ``subsection (a)'' and 
        inserting ``subsection (b)''.

    Approved December 21, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3739:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 110-484 (Comm. on Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            Dec. 11, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 14, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
### §53311. Taxation of deposits on failure of conditions

A deposited gain, if otherwise taxable income under the law applicable to the taxable year in which the gain was realized, shall be included in gross income for that taxable year, except for purposes of the declared value excess profits tax and the capital stock tax, if—

(1) the deposited gain is not expended or obligated within the appropriate period under section 53310 of this title;

(2) the deposited gain is withdrawn before the end of that period;

(3) the construction related to that deposited gain has not progressed to the extent of 5 percent of completion within the appropriate period under section 53310 of this title; or

(4) the Secretary of Transportation finds and certifies to the Secretary of the Treasury that, for causes within the control of the taxpayer, the entire construction related to that deposited gain is not completed with reasonable dispatch.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1590.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 53311 | 46 App.:1161(i). | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title V, §511(i), as added Oct. 10, 1940, ch. 849, 54 Stat. 1107; July 17, 1952, ch. 939, §13(b), 66 Stat. 764; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(92)(A), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 161. |

Section

The last sentence of 46 App. U.S.C. 1161(i) is omitted as obsolete.
#### § 972.136 Timing of submission of conversion plans to HUD.

The requirements of this section are on-going requirements. If the PHA must submit a plan for conversion, it must submit the conversion plan as part of the PHA's Annual Plan, beginning with PHA fiscal years that commence six months after the effective date of HUD's final rule establishing the cost methodology for required conversions.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. ("Company")") Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 ("Report"), the
undersigned certifies that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 14, 2008

By: /s/ JASON MEYERS
Co-Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00403

- CV

S HARLENE B AKER

, Appellant

V

.

F ERRIER B UILDERS

, I NC

. , Appellee §

§

§

§ On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 3

of Tarrant County ( 2021

- 005391

- 3 )

August 22, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the trial court’s judgment

is affirmed.

It is further ordered that Appellant Sharlene Baker must pay all costs of this

appeal.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Elizabeth Kerr

__________________ Justice Elizabeth Kerr
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTesting of Wrought Iridium/Chemical Vapor Deposition Rhenium RocketA 22-N class, iridium/rhenium (Ir/Re) rocket chamber, composed of a thick (418 miocrometer) wrought iridium (Ir) liner and a rhenium substrate deposited via chemical vapor deposition, was tested over an extended period on gaseous oxygen/gaseous hydrogen (GO2/GH2) propellants. The test conditions were designed to produce species concentrations similar to those expected in an Earth-storable propellant combustion environment. Temperatures attained in testing were significantly higher than those expected with Earth-storable propellants, both because of the inherently higher combustion temperature of GO2/GH2 propellants and because the exterior surface of the rocket was not treated with a high-emissivity coating that would be applied to flight class rockets. Thus the test conditions were thought to represent a more severe case than for typical operational applications. The chamber successfully completed testing (over 11 hr accumulated in 44 firings), and post-test inspections showed little degradation of the Ir liner. The results indicate that use of a thick, wrought Ir liner is a viable alternative to the Ir coatings currently used for Ir/Re rockets.Document ID19970036347Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeReprint (Version printed in journal)AuthorsReed, Brian D.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Schneider, Steven J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredAugust 17, 2013Publication DateDecember 9, 1996Subject CategorySpacecraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberE-10735NAS 1.15:107452NASA-TM-107452Meeting InformationMeeting: 1996 Propulsion and Joint Subcommittee MeetingsLocation: Albuquerque, NMCountry: United StatesStart Date: December 9, 1996End Date: December 13, 1996Sponsors:Department of the Navy,Department of the Army,Department of the Air Force,NASA HeadquartersAccession Number97N30662Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 632-1B-1BDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970036347.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024