alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §736. Puerto Rican law modified

So much of the law which was in force at the time of cession, April 11th, 1899, forbidding the marriage of priests, ministers, or followers of any faith because of vows they may have taken, being paragraph 4, article 83, chapter 3, civil code, and which was continued by the order of the secretary of justice of Puerto Rico, dated March 17, 1899, and promulgated by Major General Guy V. Henry, United States Volunteers, is repealed and annulled, and all persons lawfully married in Puerto Rico shall have all the rights and remedies conferred by law upon parties to either civil or religious marriages. Paragraph 1, article 105, section 4, divorce, civil code, and paragraph 2, section 19, of the order of the minister of justice of Puerto Rico, dated March 17, 1899, and promulgated by Major General Guy V. Henry, United States Volunteers, are so amended as to read: "Adultery on the part of either the husband or the wife."

(Apr. 12, 1900, ch. 191, §8, 31 Stat. 79; May 17, 1932, ch. 190, 47 Stat. 158.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Puerto Rican Federal Relations Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Puerto Rico" substituted in text for "Porto Rico" pursuant to act May 17, 1932, which is classified to section 731a of this title.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Reportof Cloud Medical Doctor Software Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2010 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Pamela Thompson, Principle FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3121 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3121

To amend title 39, United States Code, to prevent certain types of mail 
 matter from being sent by a Member of the House of Representatives as 
                        part of a mass mailing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 29, 2005

  Mr. LaHood introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on 
 Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 39, United States Code, to prevent certain types of mail 
 matter from being sent by a Member of the House of Representatives as 
                        part of a mass mailing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESTRICTION.

    (a) In General.--Section 3210(a) of title 39, United States Code, 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(8) A Member of the House of Representatives may not send, as 
part of a mass mailing, any matter described in subparagraph (B), (C), 
or (F) of paragraph (3).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to mail sent during any session of Congress 
beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NUMBER 13-10-00084-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

ALLSTATE COUNTY MUTUAL APPELLANT,

INSURANCE COMPANY, 

v.

PAYNE BROWNSVILLE, INC., 

D/B/A PAYNE LINCOLN MERCURY APPELLEE. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Vela 

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Allstate County Mutual Insurance Company, perfected an appeal from

a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 1 of Cameron County, Texas, in

cause number 2004-CCL-145-A. This appeal was abated by this Court on March 12,
2

2010, and the parties were ordered to mediation. 

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss with prejudice on grounds that the

parties have reached a compromise settlement agreement that resolves all disputes in

this matter. The parties request that this Court dismiss this case with prejudice.

Accordingly, we REINSTATE the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to

dismiss with prejudice, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a). The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. In accordance with the agreement of the parties,

costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent

agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having

dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained,

and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 6th

day of May, 2010.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6156
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JEFFREY LYNN MORGAN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-01-1, CA-02-44-BO) Submitted: June 17, 2003 Decided: July 9, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeffrey Lynn Morgan, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Kenneth Fitzgerald Whitted, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jeffrey Lynn Morgan seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, , 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that, although the district court’s conclusion that Morgan’s § 2255 motion was barred by the appeal waiver contained in his plea agreement was erroneous, Morgan has failed to demonstrate that it is debatable whether he has stated valid claims of the denial of a constitutional right. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are3 adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §353. Repealed. Pub. L. 85–508, §6(k), July 7, 1958, 72 Stat. 343

Section, acts Mar. 4, 1915, ch. 181, §1, 38 Stat. 1214; Mar. 5, 1952, ch. 80, §§1–3, 66 Stat. 14; Aug. 5, 1953, ch. 323, 67 Stat. 364; Aug. 2, 1956, ch. 892, 70 Stat. 954; Aug. 27, 1958, Pub. L. 85–771, §3, 72 Stat. 929, made reservation of certain lands for educational purposes, covered disposition of proceeds or income derived from reserved lands, and set out exclusion of certain lands.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,601
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,937
<ALLOWANCES>                                       100
<INVENTORY>                                     13,452
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,603
<PP&E>                                           5,881
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,699
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,507
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,488
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       112,346
<OTHER-SE>                                    (139,490)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,507
<SALES>                                         38,024
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,024
<CGS>                                           17,346
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,346
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,078
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,920
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,680
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,405
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,275
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,275
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>
### §2192. Right of Puerto Rico to determine its future political status

Nothing in this chapter shall be interpreted to restrict Puerto Rico's right to determine its future political status, including by conducting the plebiscite as authorized by Public Law 113–76.

(Pub. L. 114–187, title IV, §402, June 30, 2016, 130 Stat. 586.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 114–187, June 30, 2016, 130 Stat. 549, known as the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act and also as PROMESA, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2101 of this title and Tables.

Public Law 113–76, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 113–76, Jan. 17, 2014, 128 Stat. 5, known as the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014. Provisions relating to appropriations for a plebiscite on Puerto Rico's future political status appear at 128 Stat. 61. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
#### § 574.655 Wage rates.

The provisions of the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 276a-276a-5) do not apply to this program, except where funds received under this part are combined with funds from other Federal programs that are subject to the Act.

[59 FR 17201, Apr. 11, 1994]
### §618a–1. Availability of Colorado River Development Fund for investigation and construction purposes

The availability of appropriations from the Colorado River Development Fund for the investigation and construction of projects in any of the States of the Colorado River Basin shall not be held to forbid the expenditure of other funds for those purposes in any of those States where such funds are otherwise available therefor.

(June 1, 1948, ch. 364, §2, 62 Stat. 285.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Boulder Canyon Project Adjustment Act which comprises this subchapter.
SERVED: OCTOBER!, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MARITIME AIR CHARTERS, INC. 

·FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) · 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0905 

l., 7ill2 ... 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

1: 30 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011WP130014) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing · 

· Attachme.nt - Service List 

Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

Lawrence R. Neu 

Agent for Service 

Maritime Air Charters, LLC, Respondent 

529 Villa Drive 

Seabrook, TX 77586 

TEL: 832-291-1131 

Don Bobertz, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of Regional Counsel 

Western-Pacific Region, AWP-704 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7100 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

ONE COPY 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11•310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant/Paralegal 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0905 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk,AGC-430. 

-2-
### §1428c. Accounting procedures

The plan provided for in section 1428a of this title shall set forth such fiscal control and fund accounting procedures as may be necessary to assure proper disbursement, repayment, and accounting for such funds.

(Pub. L. 90–601, §5, Oct. 17, 1968, 82 Stat. 1172.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Organic Act of Guam which comprises this chapter.
### §70054. Definitions

In this subchapter:

(1) United states.—The term "United States" includes all territory and waters, continental or insular, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.

(2) Territorial waters.—The term "territorial waters of the United States" includes all waters of the territorial sea of the United States as described in Presidential Proclamation 5928 of December 27, 1988.

(Added Pub. L. 115–282, title IV, §407(a), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4266.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Presidential Proclamation Number 5928, referred to in par. (2), is Proc. No. 5928, Dec. 27, 1988, 54 F.R. 777, which is set out as a note under section 1331 of Title 43, Public Lands.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 38

 40

 42

▲ ★

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/17

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★ ■

■

■

■

★

●

●

●

●

★ ●

●

●

●
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3483 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3483

          To suspend temporarily the duty on certain footwear.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2005

Mr. Ryun of Kansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on certain footwear.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN FOOTWEAR.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.64.22      Footwear, other     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         than for men,                                                      31/2009
                         with outer soles
                         of leather or
                         composition
                         leather, valued
                         not over $2.50
                         per pair
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         6404.20.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3473

To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 to apply to 

Federal and State government employers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 27, 2005

Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to 

the Committee on Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 

to apply to Federal and State government employers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FEDERAL AND STATE GOVERNMENT EMPLOY4 ERS. 

5 Section 3(5) of the Occupational Safety and Health 

6 Act of 1970 is amended by striking ‘‘but does not include’’ 

7 and all that follows through ‘‘State’’ and inserting ‘‘in8 cluding the United States government, any government of 
2

•HR 3473 IH 

1 a State or political subdivision of a State, or any interstate 

2 governmental agency.’’

Æ
EXHIBIT 32

      Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350), the
undersigned, David J Cutler, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of Aspeon, Inc., (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report Form 10QSB for the three months and nine months ended March
31, 2006 of the Company (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of
Section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1034,  and  the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:       May 12, 2006

By /s/David J Cutler
   ----------------------
David J Cutler
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
121 STAT. 1348 PUBLIC LAW 110–120—NOV. 19, 2007 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 2206: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007): 

Oct. 18, considered and passed Senate. 

Nov. 5, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–120 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To provide technical corrections to Public Law 109–116 (2 U.S.C. 2131a note) 

to extend the time period for the Joint Committee on the Library to enter 

into an agreement to obtain a statue of Rosa Parks, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ROSA PARKS STATUE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1(a) of Public Law 109–116 (2 U.S.C. 

2131a note) is amended by— 

(1) striking ‘‘2 years’’ and inserting ‘‘4 years’’; and 

(2) adding at the end the following: ‘‘The Joint Committee 

may authorize the Architect of the Capitol to enter into the 

agreement and related contracts required under this subsection 

on its behalf, under such terms and conditions as the Joint 

Committee may require.’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsection 

(a) shall take effect as if included in the enactment of Public 

Law 109–116. 

Approved November 19, 2007. 

2 USC 2131a 

note. 

Nov. 19, 2007 

[S. 2206] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29 with PUBLIC LAWS
Meeting Notes—norflurazon focus meeting

4/11/2013--With Syngenta

Topics Discussed:

 Registration review schedule: reg review docket opened Sept 2012; FWP published March 

2013; DCI expected to be issued December 2013

 Syngenta provided label use and use rate clarifications and proposed to make potential label 

changes early in the process (i.e., removing farmstead uses, clarifying DFUs, and improved 

application directions). There is a concern that if Syngenta revises their labels now, they may 

have to revise the labels again when registration review mitigation goes into effects several years 

from now. But since norflurazon is unique in that there is only one registrant and a few registered 

products, the best time for revising the labels may be about 6-12 months before the publication of 

the Preliminary Risk Assessment. 

 Syngenta intends to submit additional sales data to EPA.

 Syngenta proposed potential approaches for geospatial analysis; EPA stressed that if Syngenta 

could tease out the geography of norflurazon use on a crop/use basis, then that would be helpful

for the risk assessment.

 Syngenta proposed potential approaches for exposure refinements (including a probabilistic static 

pond modeling approach, use of PRZM runoff flux when modeling terrestrial plant exposure, and 

the need to characterize flow when modeling flowing water bodies); EPA stated that it was in the 

process of developing a new model approach for estimating terrestrial plant exposure. EPA 

stressed that the shift to the new model would not take place right away. 

 Syngenta proposed potential tools/approaches for risk characterization ( e.g., use of species 

sensitivity distributions and incorporation of probabilistic statistical techniques); EPA agreed that 

these approaches may be useful and stated that while the tools/approaches that Syngenta 

discussed are the direction of risk characterization, the Agency is not yet using them.

 Syngenta asked if EPA’s science divisions were willing to look at proposed label changes and 

evaluate its effects on risk picture before such changes are submitted to RD. EPA said it was 

willing to look at proposed label changes for norflurazon since norflurazon has only one technical 

registrant and a couple labels, but its ability to do so may be limited by time constraints and 

workload. EPA stated that the process for implementing label changes as part of registration 

review was still being worked out.