1

December, 23 2015 Attn: U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room w12

- 140 1200 New Jersey

Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

RE: KEVIN WILSON

– Docket FAA

- 2015

- 5762 REQUEST AN EXEMPTION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1) , 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), AND 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI Phantom 3 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MODERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112

- 95)

Kevin Wilson 304 Otmoor Lane Cary NC 27519 919

- 656

- 7626 wilsonkw2@gmail.com

**TABLE OF CONTENTS** Page2

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS...................................................................................3

SUMMARY...................................................................................................................... .....4

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF PETITIONER....................................................4

BACKGROUND................ ....................................................................................................4

BASI S FOR PETITION.........................................................................................................5

NAME AND ADDRESS OF PETIT IONER.......................

............ ...................................... 6

THE SPECIFIC SECTIONS OF 14 C.F.R. FROM WHICH THE KEVIN WIL SON SEEKS EXEMPTION........................................

........................................... ... ............... ....... 7 THE EXTENT OF RELIEF THE KEVIN WILSON SEEKS AND THE REASON THE KEVIN WILS ON SEEKS THE RELIEF...................

................... ......... ....... . . . .. ... 1 0 THE REASONS WHY GRANTING THE KEVIN WILSON ’S REQUEST WOULD BE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST ...................................

............ .................. .......................... .1 2 THE REASONS WHY GRANTING THE EXEMPTION TO THE KEVIN WILSON WOULD NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT SAFETY..........................................

................ .... 1 4 SUMMARY THAT CAN BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGI STER....

.......... .. . .. 25 ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, VIEWS, OR ARGUMENTS AVAILABLE TO SUPPORT THE KEVIN WIL SON ’S REQUEST...

.......................................... . . ... 25 CONCLUSION.......................

..................................................................................... . ........ 2 5 APPENDICES...............................................................

. ......................... 26

**GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS**3

AGL Above Ground Level AOI Area of Interest ATC Air Traffic Control ATO Air Traffic Organization AV Aerial Vehicle CFR Code of Federal Regulations COA Certificate of Authorization FAA Federal Aviation Administration FAR Federal Aviation Regulation GCS Ground Control Station GPS Global Positioning System LOL Loss of Link NAS National Airspace System NOTAM Notice to Airman PIC Pilot In Command Section 333 FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) SO Safety Observer SOP Standard Operating Procedures UA Unmanned Aircraft UAS Unmanned Aircraft System VFR Visual Flight Rules VLOS Visual Line of Site VMC Visual Meteorological Conditions VTOL Vertical Takeoff and Landing

**SUMMARY**4

Kevin Wilson seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (DJI Phantom 3 ) pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA). This exemption will permit The KEVIN WILS ON to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) for the commercial purpose of conducting aerial video and photography of construction sites, residential and commercial real estate, over certain areas of the United States.

**INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF THE PETITIONER**  Kevin Wilson works a Real Estate assistant/photographer for local real estate firms and my Unmanned Aircraft System (DJI Phantom 3 ) aerial operations is to provide a more affordable , high

- quality production system for a variety of commercial, public, and residential uses, specifically targeting

• Appraisals

• Real

- estate marketing

• Construction sites before and after
Kevin Wilson has safely fl own small RC electric quadcopters recreationally for approximately 2 ye ars without incident. **BACKGROUND**

Unmanned Aircraft Systems: DJIPhantom 3 , UAS The KEVIN WILSON seeks an exemption to operate DJI Phantom 3 systems for compensation or hire within the NAS. The DJI Phantom 3 are vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) Unmanned Aircraft (UA) with a Ground Control Station (GCS) utilizing electronic tablet or smart phone systems. The DJI Phantom 3 has a maximum gross weight of approximately 2.8 lb. while having a diagonal dimension of 2 3.2” , a maximum speed of approximately 16.4’fps and a maximum flying height of 400'

. The DJIPhantom 3 are equipped with four main rotors; driven by Lithium Poly mer battery

powered electric motors. The DJIPhantom 3 that will be operated by The KEVIN WILS ON will be registered in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 44103, Registration ofAircraft, as well as 14 C.F.R Part 47, Aircraft Registration , and marked in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 45, Identification and Registration Marking

.

**BASIS FOR PETITION** Petitioner, KEVIN WILSON , pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 C.F.R. § 11.61) and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), Section 333, Special Rules for Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems , hereb y petitions the Administrator to commercially operate the DJI Phantom 3 , UAS in the National Airspace System (NAS), and for5

an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.4 17(a) & (b). In consideration of the speed, weight, size, and limited operating area associated with the unmanned aircraft and its operation, KEVIN WILSON operation of DJI Phantom 3 UAS meets the conditions of FMRA Section 333 and therefore, will not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Accordingly, KEVIN WILS ON requests relief from Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), as these sections set forth requirements for maintenance that only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate. KEVIN WIL SON submits that the requested relief is proper since an equivalent level of safety will be ensured. KEVIN WILSON will use experienced personnel or technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., Monthly M aintenance Lo g, and DJ I Phantom 3 Instruction Manual). Furthermore, KEVIN WILSON will document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJI Phantom 3 UAS. Relief from certain requirements of Section 61.113(a) and (b), entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command, is requested by KEVIN WILSON to the extent necessary to allow a Pilot in Command (PIC) holding a private pilot or higher level certificate, as well as an airman medical certificate, and who has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

- hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom UAS in a manner consistent with this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. KEVIN WILSON seeks relief from Section 91.7(a), entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness , because the DJIPhantom 3 UAS do not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. As such, KEVIN WILSON submits that they will ensure that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS is in an airworthy condition, prior to every f light, by determining that the UAS are in compliance with the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Lo g, and DJI Phantom 3 Instruction Manual), and that the aircraft are in a condition for safe flight. KEVIN WILSON also seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter Settings , as the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will not have a ty pical barometric altimeter onboard. However, altitude information of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be provided to the PIC via Global Positioning System (GPS) equipment and radio communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UA to the GCS for active monitoring of the flight path. This altitude information, combined with KEVIN WILSON ’s operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS within visual line of sight, at or below 4 00 feet AGL, will ensure a level of safety equivalent to Section 91.121. Additionally, KEVIN WILSON seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.151(b), entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions

. KEVIN WIL SON submits that safety will not be affected by

operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS during daylight hours in visual6

meteorological conditions (VMC) under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery p ower to fly f or a total duration of approximately 23 minutes

. B attery p ower indicators are also able to show exactly

how much battery

p ower is left, as well as how much time is needed to return safely back to point of takeoff

. Inaccordance with 14 C.F.R. § 11.81, KEVIN WILS ON provides the following information in support of its petition for exemption:

**A. Name And Address Of The Petitioner.**  The name and address of the Petitioner and point of contact is: Kevin Wilson 304 Otmoor Lane Cary NC 27519 919

- 656

- 7626 wilsonkw2@gmail.com

**B. The Specific Sections Of 14 C.F.R. From Which KEVIN WILSON**  **Seeks Exemption. 1.**  **KEVIN WILSON**  **Seeks Exemption**  **From The**  **Requirements Of**  **Section 61.113(a)**  **And (b).**  Section 61.113, entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command, subsections (a) and (b) prescribe the following, in relevant part: (a) No person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as a pilot in command (PIC) of an aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or hire; nor may that person, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft. (b) A private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection with any business or employment if

— (1) The flight is only

incidental to that business or employ ment; and7

(2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property

for compensation or hire. **2. KEVIN WILSON**  **Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a).** Section 91.7, entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness , subsection (a), states the following: (a) No person may

operate a civil aircraft unless it is in an airworthy condition. **3. KEVIN WILSON**  **Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121.** Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings , subsection (a), states the following, in part: (a) Each person operating an aircraft shall maintain the cruising altitude or flight level of that aircraft, as the case may b e, by reference to an altimeter that is set, when operating

-- (1) Below 18,000 feet MSL, to

--

(i) The current reported altimeter setting of a station along the route and within 100 nautical miles of the aircraft; (ii) If there is no station within the area prescribed in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, the current reported altimeter setting of an appropriate available station; or (iii) Inthe case of an aircraft not equipped with a radio, the elevation of the departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure.

**4. KEVIN WILSON**  **Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.151(b).** Section 91.151, entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions , subsection (b), states the following:

(b ) No person may begin a flight in a rotorcraft under VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 20 minutes. **5. KEVIN WILSON**  **Seeks Exemption From The Requirement Of Section 91.405(a).** Section 91.405, entitled Maintenance required, subsection (a), states the following: Each owner or operator of an aircraft

— (a) Shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter[.] **6. KEVIN WILSON**  **Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.407(a)(1)** 8

Section 91.407, entitled Operation after maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration , subsection (a)(1), states the following: (a) No person may

operate any aircraft that has undergone maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration unless

-- (1) Ithas been approved for return to service by ap erson authorized under § 43.7 of this chapter[.] **7. KEVIN**  **WILSON Seeks**  **Exemption From**  **The Requirements**  **Of Sections**  **91.409(a)(1) And 91.409(a)(2).**  Section 91.409, entitled Inspections , subsection (a), states the following: (a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no person may operate an aircraft unless, within the preceding 12 calendar months, it has had

-- (1) An annual inspection in accordance with part 43 of this chapter and has been approved for return to service by a person authorized by § 43.7 of this chapter; or (2) An inspection for the issuance of an airworthiness certificate in accordance with part 21 of this chapter.

**8. KEVIN**  **WILSON Seeks**  **Exemption From**  **The Requirements**  **Of Sections**  **91.417(a) And**  **91.417(b).** Section 91.417, entitled Maintenance records , subsections (a) and (b), state the following: (a) Except for work performed in accordance with §§ 91.411 and 91.413, each registered owner or operator shall keep the following records for the periods specified in paragraph (b) of this section: (1) Records of the maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alteration and records of the 100

-hour, annual, progressive, and other required or approved inspections, as appropriate, for each aircraft (including the airframe) and each engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance of an aircraft. The records must include

-- (i) A description (or reference to data acceptable to the Administrator) of the work performed; and (ii) The date of completion of the work performed; and

(iii) The signature, and certificate number of the person approving the aircraft for return to service. (2) Records containing the following information:9 (i) The total time in service of the airframe, each engine, each propeller, and each rotor. (ii) The current status of life

- limited parts of each airframe, engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance. (iii) The time since last overhaul of all items installed on the aircraft which are required to be overhauled on a specified time basis. (iv) The current inspection status of the aircraft, including the time since the last inspection required by the inspection program under which the aircraft and its appliances are maintained. (v) The current status of applicable airworthiness directives (AD) and safety directives including, for each, the method of compliance, the AD or safety directive number and revision date. If the AD or safety directive involves recurring action, the time and date when the next action is required. (vi) Copies of the f

orms prescribed by

§ 4 3.9(d) of this chapter for each major alteration to the airframe and currently installed engines, rotors, propellers, and appliances.

(b) The owner or operator shall retain the following records for the periods prescribed: (1) The records specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be retained until the work is repeated or superseded by other work or for 1 ye ar after the work is performed. (2) The records specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall be retained and transferred with the aircraft at the time the aircraft is sold. (3) A list of defects furnished to a registered owner or operator under § 43.11 of this chapter shall be retained until the defects are repaired and the aircraft is approved for return to service.

**C. The**  **Extent Of**  **Relief KEVIN**  **WILSON Seeks**  **And The**  **Reason KEVIN**  **WILSON Seeks**  **The Relief. 1.**  **Extent Of**  **Relief KEVIN**  **WILSON Seeks**  **And The**  **Reason KEVIN**  **WILSON Seeks**  **Relief From Section 61.113(a) And (b).** Relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command, is requested to the extent necessary to allow a PIC holding a private pilot or higher10

level certificate, as well as a current and valid airman medical certificate, and who has met certain flight

-hour and currency requirements, to conduct the proposed UAS flight operations for compensation or hire. This relief is requested since the limitations set forth in Section 61.113(a) and (b) state that a private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection with any business or employ

ment if: (1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employ ment; and (2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property

for compensation or hire. As set forth more fully

b elow, KEVIN WIL SON submits that an equivalent level of safety will be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Phantom 2 or 3 UAS unless that PIC has met certain flight

-hour and currency requirements, demonstrating that the PIC is able to safely operate either the DJI Phantom 3 UAS in a manner consistent with the operations specifications as described in this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers, as well as maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. Further, KEVIN WILSON submits that all flights of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS , conducted by the PIC pursuant to the grant of this Petition: (1) will be incidental to KEVIN WILS ON ’s business; and (2) will not carry

passengers or property for compensation or hire.

**2. Extent**  **Of Relief**  **KEV IN**  **WILSON Seeks**  **And The**  **Reason KEVIN**  **WILSON Seeks**  **Relief From Section 91.7(a).** Relief from Section 91.7(a) entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness , is requested to the extent required to allow KEVIN WILSON to determine that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS are in airworthy condition prior to every flight by ensuring that the UAS is in compliance with the operating documents (i.e., KEVIN WILSON Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Lo g, and DJIPhantom 3 Instruction Manual). KEVIN WILSON seeks the requested relief because the DJIPhantom 3 UAS do not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Therefore, KEVIN WILS ON will ensure that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS are in airworthy c ondition based upon its compliance with the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 ) prior to every

f light, and further, determine that the aircraft are in condition for safe flight, as stated in the conditions and limitations below.

**3. Extent**  **Of Relief**  **KEVIN WILSON**  **Seeks And**  **The Reason**  **KEVIN WILSON**  **Seeks Relief From Section 91.121.**  Relief from Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings , may b e required to allow flight operations of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, which utilize a barometric pressure sensor, GPS equipment, and a radio communications telemetry data link to downlink altitude information from the UA to the PIC at the ground control station (GCS). Since the FAA requires that any altitude information concerning UAS operations be reported to air traffic control (ATC) in feet11

above ground level (AGL), KEVIN WILSON seeks the requested relief because the DJI Phantom 3 UA’s altimeter may b e set on the ground to zero feet AGL, rather than the local barometric pressure or field altitude, before each flight. Considering the limited altitude of the proposed operations, relief from 14 CFR 91.121 is sought to the extent necessary

to comply

with the applicable conditions and limitations stated below. As more fully

s et forth herein, an equivalent level of safety will be maintained since the DJI Phantom 3 UAS are equipped with a barometric pressure sensor and GPS equipment, which automatically

ensures that a ground level pressure setting will be established prior to each flight, and provides the PIC with altitude information of the UA on the heads

-up display of the GCS.

**4. Extent**  **Of Relief**  **KEVIN WILSON**  **Seeks And**  **The Reason**  **KEVIN WILSON**  **Seeks Relief From Section 91.151(b).**  Relief from Section 91.151(b) entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions , is requested to the extent required to allow flights of the battery p owered DJI Phantom 3 UAS during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), for a total duration of 23 minutes. KEVIN WILSON seeks the requested relief because without an exemption from Section 91.151(b), the flight time duration of the battery p owered DJI Phantom 3 UAS will severely constrain the practicality o f any aerial video or still photo flight operations that KEVIN WIL SON proposes to conduct pursuant to this Petition. Significantly, as set forth below, the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS , the DJI Phantom 3 operating documents, and KEVIN WILSON ’s proposed operating limitations, ensure that KEVIN WILSON will safely operate the battery

p owered DJI Phantom 3 UAS during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery

power to fly

for a total duration of 23 minutes

.

**5. Extent**  **Of Relief**  **KEVIN WILSO** **N Seeks**  **And The**  **Reason KEVIN**  **WILSON Seeks**  **Relief From Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b).** Since Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, KEVIN WILSON requests relief from these Sections because the DJI Phantom 3 UAS do not require airworthiness certificates. As set forth more fully below, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS meet the conditions of FMRA Section 333 for operation without an airworthiness certificate. Accordingly, KEVIN WILSON will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the UAS operating documents (i.e., the KEVIN WILSON Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Lo g, and DJI Phantom 3 Instruction Manual). Furthermore, KEVIN WILSON will document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJI Phantom 3 UAS

.12

**D. The**  **Reasons Why**  **Granting KEVIN**  **WILSON Request**  **Would Be**  **In The**  **Public Interest; That Is, How It Would Benefit The Public As A Whole.**  Granting the present Petition will further the public interest by allowing KEVIN WILSON to safely, efficiently, and economically p erform aerial video and photography o f construction sites, real estate, over certain areas of the United States. Additionally, use of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will decrease congestion of the NAS, reduce pollution, and provide significant benefits to the economy. Notably, the benefits of KEVIN WILS ON ’s proposed operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be realized without implicating any privacy issues.

**1. The Public Will Benefit From Decreased Congestion Of The NAS.** The DJI Phantom 3 UAS are battery p owered and serve as a safe, efficient, and economical alternative to the manned aircraft traditionally utilized to obtain aerial imagery

. By reducing the amount of manned aircraft needed to perform aerial acquisitions, an exemption allowing the use of a DJI Phantom 3 UAS would reduce the amount of manned aircraft in the NAS, reduce noise and air pollution, as well as increase the safety of life and property in the air and on the ground. Furthermore, by

reducing the number of manned aircraft operating in the NAS, congestion around airports caused by arriving and departing aircraft will be reduced. The DJI Phantom 3 UAS do not require an airport to takeoff or land. Likewise, a reduction of manned aircraft conducting aerial video and photography missions would result in fewer aircraft that must be handled by

air traffic control during the ground, takeoff, departure, arrival, and landing phases of flight operations.
**2. The Public Will Benefit From The Safety And Efficiency Of The DJI Phantom 3**  **UAS.** Conducting aerial acquisitions with the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, instead of manned aircraft, will greatly benefit the public by drastically

reducing the levels of air and noise pollution generated during traditional aerial video and still photography flight operations. By using battery

p ower and electric motors, the DJIPhantom 3 UAS produce no air pollution, and is the most viable environmentally

c onscious alternative to the cabin class, six

- cylinder internal combustion engine aircraft that are ty

pically utilized for aerial video and photography, while burning approximately 20

- 30 gallons per hour of leaded aviation fuel. The DJI Phantom 3 UAS , while reducing the carbon footprint of aerial acquisitions, also eliminates noise pollution, as the UAS are propelled by battery powered electric motors, rather than an internal combustion engine. By using the DJI Phantom 3 UAS to perform aerial acquisitions, the substantial risk to life and property in the air and on the ground, which is usually associated with traditional manned aircraft flight operations, will be substantially reduced or completely eliminated. Aside from the lack of13

flight crew members located onboard the aircraft, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS (weighing approximately

2 .8 pounds at their maximum gross weight with diagonal dimension of 23.2 inches , and with no fuel on board), has less physical potential for collateral damage to life and property on the ground, and in the air, compared to the manned aircraft that ty pically c onduct similar operations (weighing approximately 6 ,000 pounds with a wingspan of approximately 42 feet, a length of 34 feet, and a fuel capacity of 180 gallons). **3. Performi ng Aerial Video and Photography Operations With The**  **DJI Phantom 3 UAS**  **Will Benefit The Economy.** Inaddition to being safe and efficient, the DJIPhantom 3 UAS are also an economical alternative to using manned aircraft to conduct similar aerial operations. As such, operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will allow United States based companies, like KEVIN WILSON , to remain competitive and contribute to growth of the U.S. economy. Specifically, with the rising cost of aviation fuel and the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) regulatory

actions phasing out leaded aviation fuels, U.S. owned and operated companies must adopt new and alternative technology

in order to remain competitive. Operating the battery p owered DJI Phantom 3 UAS is one such technology that not only

allows companies greater operational flexibility c ompared to manned aircraft, but provides such flexibility without the high operational cost of a traditional manned aircraft. By operating the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, companies such as KEVIN WILS ON , can remain competitive and profitable, and therefore, provide greater job stability to employees and contractors, which will ultimately c ontribute to growth of the U.S. economy. Improved financial performance of U.S. companies, through commercial use of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, provides a stable workforce that increases consumer spending; improves local, state, and federal tax revenues; and allows companies to invest in research and development in order to remain competitive both in the United States and abroad.

**4. There Are No Privacy Issues.** Similar to the manned aerial acquisition flight operations that have been conducted for decades, KEVIN WILSON ’s proposed operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will not implicate any privacy i ssues. Specifically, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be operated only in compliance with operating documents (i.e., KEVIN WILSON Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Lo g, and DJI Phantom 3 Instruction Manual) which requires property owner involvement as well as local law enforcement notification, and in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations, including the minimum altitude requirements of 14 C.F.R. § 91.119. **E. The**  **Reasons Why**  **Granting The**  **Exemption Would**  **Not Adversely**  **Affect Safety,**  **Or How**  **The Exemption**  **Would Provide**  **A Level**  **Of Safety**  **At Least**  **Equal To**  **That Provided**  **By The Rule From Which KEVIN WILSON**  **Seeks Exemption. 1.**  **Reasons Why**  **The DJI**  **Phantom 3**  **UA S**  **Meet The**  **Conditions Of**  **The FAA**  **Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333.**14

In consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the unmanned aircraft and its operation, KEVIN WILSON ’s operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS meet the conditions of FMRA Section 333, and will not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Section 333 provides authority f or a UAS to operate without airworthiness certification and sets forth requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security. Specifically, FMRA Section 333 states the following, in part:

(a ) In General.

--Notwithstanding any other requirement of this subtitle, and not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall determine if certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system before completion of the plan and rulemaking required by section 332 of this Act or the guidance required by section 334 of this Act. (b ) Assessment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems.

--In making the determination under subsection (a), the Secretary shall determine, at a minimum

-- (1 ) which types of unmanned aircraft systems, if any, as a result of their size, weight, speed, operational capability, proximity to airports and populated areas, and operation within visual line of sight do not create a hazard to users of the national air

space system or the public or pose a threat to national security; and (2 ) whether a certificate of waiver, certificate of authorization, or airworthiness certification under section 44704 of title 49, United States Code, is required for the operation of unmanned aircraft systems identified under paragraph (1). (c) Requirements for Safe Operation.

--If the Secretary determines under this section that certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system, the Secretary shall establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system. Ins eeking this exemption, KEVIN WIL SON submits that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS can operate safely in the NAS pursuant to FMRA Section 333, as demonstrated by : (a) the characteristics of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS ; (b) the pilot certification requirement; and (c) the specific operating limitations. **a. The Specifications Of The DJI Phantom 3**  **UAS Demonstrate Its Safe Characteristics.**  The DJI Phantom 3 UAS do es not create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security considering its size, weight, speed, and operational capability. **i. Technical Specifications Of The DJI Phantom 3**  **UAS .** 15

The technical specifications of the DJIPhantom 3 UAS are set forth by the DJI Phantom 3 User Manual , attached hereto as Appendix A

. **ii. The DJI Phantom 3**  **UAS Global Positioning Modes Enable The UAS**  **To Remain Within A Defined Operational Area.**  The DJI Phantom 3 UAS may be operated in both manual and global positioning flight modes. A complete description of the flight and navigational modes of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS is provided at pages 11 of the DJI Phantom 3 User Manual attached hereto as Appendix A

. **iii. The DJI P** **hantom 3 UAS**  **Are Designed For Automatic Return To Home Point Or Hover In The Event Of Loss Of The Control Link Or Navigation.**  When the Control Link is lost, the DJIPhantom 3 UAS will remain stationary, in flight, for 3 seconds or more. If, after 3 seconds, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS do es not reacquire control link data from the GCS, the UAS will assume that the Control Link is lost and the will return to the home position (i.e., fails afe mode) via GPS, and will descend to the takeoff position and shutdown. A complete description of the Failsaf e Functions of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS are set forth at pages 12 through 14 of the DJI Phantom 3 User Manual, attached hereto as Appendix A

. **iv. The**  **DJI Phantom 3 GCS And Its Operation.**  A complete description of the operation and specifications of the DJIPhantom 3 GCS and flight control software is provided at pages 23 through 29 of the DJI Phantom 3 User Manual. DJI Phantom 3 User Manual is attached hereto as Appendix A

. **b. Flight Operations Of DJI Phantom 3 UAS**  **Is Limited To The Line Of Sight Of A**  **Certificated Pilot in Command With A Safety Observer.** KEVIN WIL SON will be the only p ersons to act as a pilot in command (PIC) of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS . Additionally, a safety observer will assist him at all times during flight time. **c. Flights Of DJI Phantom 3 UAS**  **Will Be Conducted Pursuant To Specific Operating Limitations.**  In seeking this exemption, KEVIN WIL SON proposes to commerci ally operate DJI Phantom 3 UAS for the special purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of United States, pursuant to the following specific operating limitations

.

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption will be limited to the following aircraft described in the operating documents, rotorcraft UAS weighing less than 55 pounds maximum gross weight: DJI Phantom 3 Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this grant.

2. UAS operations under this exemption will be limited to conducting operations for the purpose of aerial video and photography.16 3. The UA S may

not be flown at an indicated airspeed exceeding 20 knots. 4. The UA S must be operated at an altitude of no more than 4 00 feet above ground level (AGL), as indicated by the procedures specified in the operating documents unless a special request is made and approved by ATC. All altitudes reported to ATC must be in feet AGL. 5. The UAS must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA

- issued airman medical certificate. 6. The use of first person view (FPV) by the PIC or safety observer (SO) is not permitted. 7. All operations must utilize a safety observer (SO). The SO may b e used to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS capability

. The SO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times. Electronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the duration of the fli ght. The PIC must ensure that the SO can perform the functions prescribed in the operating documents. 8. The SO must not perform any other duties beyond assisting the PIC with seeing and avoiding other air traffic and other ground based obstacles/obstructions and is not permitted to operate the camera or other instruments. 9. The operating documents and the grant of exemption must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy

exists between the conditions and limitations contained in the grant of exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents, the conditions and limitations contained in the grant of exemption take precedence and must be followed. Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating documents. The operator may u pdate or revise its operating documents. Iti s the operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised documents to the Administrator upon request. The operator must also present updated and revised documents if it petitions for extension or amendment to the grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted the exemption, then the operator must petition for amendment to its grant of exemption. The FAA’s UAS Integration Office (AFS

- 80) may b e contacted if questions arise regarding updates or revisions to the operating documents. 10. Prior to each flight the PIC must inspect the UAS to ensure that it is in a condition for safe flight. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has17 been performed and the UAS is found to b e in a condition for safe flight. The Ground Control Station must be included in the preflight inspection. All maintenance and alterations must be properly documented in the aircraft records. 11. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation or flight characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo a functional test flight. The PIC who conducts the functional test flight must make an entry

in the aircraft records. 12. The pre - flight insp ection must account for all potential discrepancies, e.g. inoperable components, items, or equipment, not already covered in the relevant sections of the operating documents. 13. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s aircraft/component, maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements. 14. The operator must carry out its maintenance, inspections, and record keeping requirements, in accordance with the operating documents. Maintenance, inspection, alterations, and status of replacement/overhaul component parts must be noted in the aircraft records, including total time in service, description of work accomplished, and the signature of the authorized person returning the UAS to service. 15. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer Safety Bulletins. 16. The authorized person must make an entry in the aircraft record of the corrective action taken against discrepancies discovered between inspections. 17. The PIC must possess at least a private pilot certificate and at least a current third

class medical certificate. 18. The operator may

not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC meets the operator’s qualification criteria and demonstrates the ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC qualification flight hours must be logged in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs are permitted under the terms of the exemption. However, training operations may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During training, proficiency, and experience

-building flights, all persons not essential for flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 91.119. 19. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 C.F.R. § 1.1. All operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). If flight at night is required, a special request will be made at the FAA office closest to18 proposed area of operations. Flights under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized. 20. The UA may

not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point as denoted on a current FAA

-published aeronautical chart unless a letter of agreement with that air

port’s management is obtained, and the operation is conducted in accordance with a NOTAM as required by the operator’s COA. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available to the Administrator upon request. 21. The UA may

not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet horizontally

from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC. 22. If the UA loses communications or loses its GPS signal, it must return to a pre determined location within the planned operating area and land or be recovered in accordance with the operating documents. 23. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies in accordance with the operating documents. 24. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough power to fly at normal cruising speed to the intended landing point and land the UA with 25% battery power remaining. 25. The operator must obtain an Air Traffic Organization (ATO) issued Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA) prior to conducting any operations under the grant of exemption. This COA will also require the operator to request a Notice to Airman (NOTAM) not more than 72 hours in advance, but not less than 48 hours prior to the operation. All operations shall be conducted in accordance with airspace requirements in the ATO issued COA including class of airspace, altitude level and potential transponder requirements. 26. All aircraft operated in accordance with the exemption must be identified by serial number, registered in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 47, and have identification (N

Number) markings in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 45, Subpart C. Markings must be as large as practicable. 27. Before conducting operations, the radio frequency spectrum used for operation and control of the UA must comply with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) or other appropriate government oversight agency requirements. 28. The documents required fewer than 14 C.F.R. 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the UAS is operating. These documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. 29. The UA must remain clear and yi eld the right of way to all manned aviation operations and activities at all times.19 30. The UAS may

not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle. 31. Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating persons (persons other than the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons), vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of the UA, flight operations must cease immediately and/or; b. The aircraft is operated near vessels, vehicles or structures where the owner/controller of such vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission and the PIC has made a safety assessment of the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not present an undue hazard, and;

c. Operations nearer to the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons do not present an undue hazard to those persons per § 91.119(a). 32. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled

- access property with permission from the land owner/controller or authorized representative. Permission from land owner/controller or authorized representative will be obtained for each flight to be conducted. 33. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported to the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS

- 80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be reported to the National Transportation Safety B oard (NTSB) per instructions contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov.

**2. Reasons**  **Why An**  **Exemption From**  **The Requirements**  **Of Section**  **61.113(a) And**  **(b) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.**  KEVIN WIL SON submits that the equivalent level of safety established by S ection 61.113(a) and (b) will be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

-hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS in a manner consistent with the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. Considering KEVIN WILSON ’s proposed area of operations, and the operating limitations set forth

- above; the parallel nature of private pilot aeronautical knowledge requirements to those of commercial pilot requirements ( See Exemption No. 11062); and the airmanship skills neces sary to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, KEVIN WILSON submits that the additional manned20

airmanship experience of a commercially certificated pilot would not correlate to the airmanship skills necessary

for KEVIN WILSON ’s specific proposed flight operations. The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161). KEVIN WILSON will not allow any PIC to operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

-hour requirements or the DJI Phantom 3 UAS training and currency

requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS in a manner consistent with this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. Specifically, the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot (with a minimum of 5 hours of those hours as a UAS pilot operating the same make and model of UAS to be used for operations under the exemption). Inaddition to the hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90 days (for currency purposes). As in Exemption Nos. 11062, 11138, and 11153, prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations will ensure an equivalent level of safety during KEVIN WILS ON ’s proposed operations. The Administrator has held that prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations would ensure safe operations, stating as follows: In Exemption No. 11062, the FAA required that prior to conducting operations for the purpose of motion picture filming (or similar operations), the PIC must have accumulated and lo gged, in a manner consistent with 14 CFR 61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot including at least 10 hours logged as a UAS pilot with a multi

-rotor UAS. Prior to operations under Exemption No. 11062, the PIC must also have accumulated and logged a minimum of 5 hours as a UAS pilot operating the same make and model of UAS to be used for operations under the exemption. For clarification, the FAA considers these minimum hour requirements to be inclusive rather than additive; i.e. 5 hours make and model time may be included in the 10 hours of multi

-rotor time and the 10 hours may

b e included in the total 25 hours of UAS rotorcraft time. In addition to the hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90 days (for currency

purposes). The FAA finds that at a minimum, the flight

-hour requirements in Exemption No. 11062 are appropriate to practice and build proficiency in the skills necessary

to safely c onduct the petitioner’s proposed operations. The FAA als o finds that prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations would satisfy this requirement. Training, proficiency, and experience

-building flights can also be conducted under the grant of exemption to accomplish the required flight time. During training, proficiency, and experience

-building21

flights the PIC is required to operate the UA with appropriate distances in accordance with 14 C.F.R 91.119.
Exemption No. 11138 at page 15. Accordingly, KEVIN WILSON will ensure safe operations by not allowing any PIC to operate the DJIPhantom 3 UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

-hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJIPhantom 3 UAS in a manner consistent with the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

**3. Reasons**  **Why An**  **Exemption From**  **The Requirements**  **Of Section**  **91.7(a) Would**  **Not Adversely Affect Safety.**  The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.7(a) will be maintained because prior to every f light, KEVIN WILSON will ensure that the DJIPhantom 3 UAS is in an airworthy condition based upon the UAS’s compliance with its operating documents and as stated in the conditions and limitations herein. Additionally, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.7(a) specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

**4. Reasons**  **Why An**  **Ex emption**  **From The**  **Requirements Of**  **Section 91.121**  **Would Not**  **Adversely Affect Safety.** The equivalent level of safety established by S ection 91.121 will be maintained because the altitude information of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be provided to the PIC via GPS equipment and a radio communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UA to the GCS for active monitoring of the flight path and altitude. This altitude information, combined with KEVIN WIL SON ’s operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS within visual line of sight, at or below 500 feet AGL, will ensure a level of safety equivalent to Section 91.121. The altitude information will be generated by GPS equipment installed onboard the aircraft. Prior to each flight, a zero altitude initiation point is automatically established b y the UAS at ground level. The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.121 specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11 066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).22

**5. Reasons**  **Why An**  **Exemption From**  **The Requirements**  **Of Section**  **91.151(b) Would**  **Not Adversely Affect Safety.**  A grant of this exemption would ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 1 4 C.F.R. Section 91.151(b) as a result of (1) the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS ; (2) the limitations on the proposed flight operations; and (3) the location of the proposed flight operations. Acc ordingly, KEVIN WILSON will ensure that it will safely operate the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 UAS during daylight hours in VFR conditions, with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of 23 minutes. Here, as in Exemption No. 11109, the technic al specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS ; the limitations on the proposed flight operations; and the location of the proposed operations, will ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 1 4 C.F.R. Section 91.151(b). Furthermore, safety will be ensured as the DJIPhantom 3 UAS provide audible and visual warnings to the PIC at the GCS when the UAS experiences low battery voltage, the first warning occurring at approximately

3 3% remaining battery

p ower, and again at approximately 10% remaining battery power. At the critically low battery level, the DJIPhantom 3 UAS will descend and land automatically

. Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Section 91.151 establish that safety is not adversely affected when the technical characteristics and operating limitations of the UAS are considered. Relief has been granted for manned aircraft to operate at less than the minimums prescribed in Section 91.151, including Exemption Nos. 2689, 5745, and 10650. Moreover, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.151 specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 8811, 10808, 10673, 11042, 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

**6. Reasons**  **Why An**  **Exemption From**  **The Requireme** **nts Of**  **Sections 91.405(a),**  **91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1)**  **& (a)(2),**  **And 91.417(a)**  **& (b)**  **Would Not**  **Adversely Affect Safety.**  Ins eeking this exemption, KEVIN WIL SON submits that the equivalent level of safety with regard to the regulatory maintenance and alteration requirements established by S ections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) will be met because KEVIN WILS ON will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., the KEVIN WILSON Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Lo g, and DJIPhantom 3 Instruction Manual). Furthermore, KEVIN WILSON will document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJI Phantom 3 UAS. Since the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be inspected as prescribed by the operating documents, KEVIN WIL SON will maintain the equivalent level of safety established by S ections 91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1), and 91.409(a)(2). A copy of the DJI Phantom 3 User Manuals are attached hereto23

as Appendix A and B; a copy of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS Maintenance LOG is attached hereto as Appendix C. Likewise, the exemption sought will not adversely affect safety because KEVIN WIL SON will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed by the operating documents. Furthermore, the exemption sought would maintain an equivalent level of safety established by Sections 91.407, 91.417(a) and 91.417(b), because all maintenance of the DJIPhantom 3 UAS will be performed by

trained technicians. Maintenance will be documented and maintained utilizing the monthly

maintenance log. Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) establish that safety is not adversely affected when the technical characteristics and operating limitations of the UAS are considered. In consideration of KEVIN WILSON ’s proposed operating limitations, the operating documents, and the technical aspects of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS , KEVIN WILSON submits that safety will not be adversely

affected by

granting exemption from 14 C.F.R. Sections 91 .405(a), 91.407(a)(1) and (a)(2), 91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a) and (b). The FAA has previously granted relief specific to UAS in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 1106 6, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161). **7. The FAA May Prescribe Any Other Conditions For Safe Operation.** In accordance with Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16 entitled Special Conditions , KEVIN WIL SON requests that the FAA prescribe special conditions for the intended operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS , which contain such safety standards that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7 (a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). Such special conditions will permit safe operation of the UAS for the limited purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States for compensation or hire. FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security; and further, provides the authority f or such UAS to operate without airworthiness certification in accordance with any requirements that must be established for the safe operation of the UAS in the NAS. Likewise, the Administrator may prescribe special conditions pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, for operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS , since the airworthiness regulations of 14 C.F.R. Part 21 do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards, due to the novel or unusual design features of the aircraft. Section 21.16, entitled Special Conditions , states the following:24

If the FAA finds that the airworthiness regulations of this subchapter do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for an aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller because of a novel or unusual design feature of the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller, he prescribes special conditions and amendments thereto for the product. The special conditions are issued in accordance with Part 11 of this chapter and contain such safety standards for the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller as the FAA finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established in the regulations. See 14 C.F.R . § 21.16. Therefore, in accordance with FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, the FAA may prescribe special conditions for Leading Edge’s intended operation of the DJIPhantom 3 UAS , which contain such safety standards that the Administrator finds neces sary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by 1 4 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b).

**• A**  **Summary That**  **C an**  **Be Published**  **In The**  **Federal Register,**  **stating: The**  **Rules From Which KE**  **VIN WILSON Seeks Exemption:** 

KEVIN WILSON seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a)&(b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a )(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). **A Brief Description Of The Nature Of The Exemption KEVIN WILSON**  **Seeks:** This exemption will permit KEVIN WILSON to commercially operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) for the purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States.

**• Any**  **Additional Information,**  **Views, Or**  **Arguments Available**  **To Support**  **KEVIN WILSON ’s**  **Request.**
This Petition is made pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333, which directs the Secretary o f Transportation to determine if certain UAS may operate safely in the NAS. As such, KEVIN WILSON ’s request for exemption may b e granted pursuant to the authority of FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, as set forth above. FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security; and further, provides the authority for such UAS to operate without airworthiness certi fication.25

As discussed in detail above, KEVIN WILSON will operate the DJIPhantom 3 UAS safely in the NAS, without creating a hazard to users of the NAS, or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security. **CONCLUSION** As set forth herein, KEVIN WIL SON seeks an exemption pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.61 and Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), which will permit safe operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS commercially, without an airworthiness certificate, for the limited purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States. By

granting this Petition, the FAA Administrator will be fulfilling the Congressional mandate of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, while also advancing the interests of the public, by

allowing KEVIN WILSON to safely, efficiently, and economically operate the DJIPhantom 3 UAS commercially within the NAS. **WHEREFORE** , in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Section 333, KEVIN WILSON respectfully requests that the Administrator grant this Petition for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), and permit Kevin Wilson to operate the DJIPhantom 3 UAS commercially for the purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States. Dated: December 23 , 2015 Respectfully

submitted,

Kevin Wilson 304 Otmoor Lane Cary NC 27519 919

- 656

- 7626 wilsonkw2@gmail.com
Appendices :

A

– Link to DJI Phantom 3 Manual: Click on link below http://download.dji

innovations.com/downloads/phantom_3/en/Phantom_3_Professional_User_Manual_v1.2_en.pdf26