alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §11201. Eligibility for veterans' burial and cemetery benefits

(a) Eligibility.—

(1) In general.—The qualified service of an individual referred to in paragraph (2) shall be considered to be active duty in the Armed Forces during a period of war for purposes of eligibility for benefits under the following provisions of title 38:

(A) Chapter 23 (relating to burial benefits).

(B) Chapter 24 (relating to interment in national cemeteries).

(2) Covered individuals.—Paragraph (1) applies to an individual who—

(A) receives an honorable service certificate under section 11203 of this title; and

(B) is not eligible under any other provision of law for benefits under laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

(b) Reimbursement for Benefits Provided.—The Secretary shall reimburse the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for the value of benefits that the Secretary of Veterans Affairs provides for an individual by reason of eligibility under this section.

(c) Applicability.—

(1) General rule.—Benefits may be provided under the provisions of law referred to in subsection (a)(1) by reason of this chapter only for deaths occurring after the date of the enactment of this chapter.

(2) Burials, etc. in national cemeteries.—Notwithstanding paragraph (1), in the case of an initial burial or columbarium placement after the date of the enactment of this chapter, benefits may be provided under chapter 24 of title 38 by reason of this chapter (regardless of the date of death), and in such a case benefits may be provided under section 2306 of such title.

(Added Pub. L. 105–368, title IV, §402(a), Nov. 11, 1998, 112 Stat. 3336; amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8505(b)(11), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4751.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of the enactment of this chapter, referred to in subsec. (c), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 105–368, which was approved Nov. 11, 1998.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "an individual" for "a person" wherever appearing.
### §34. Licenses for landing or operating cables connecting United States with foreign country; necessity for

No person shall land or operate in the United States any submarine cable directly or indirectly connecting the United States with any foreign country, or connecting one portion of the United States with any other portion thereof, unless a written license to land or operate such cable has been issued by the President of the United States. The conditions of sections 34 to 39 of this title shall not apply to cables, all of which, including both terminals, lie wholly within the continental United States.

(May 27, 1921, ch. 12, §1, 42 Stat. 8.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Submarine Cable Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

For delegation of functions, vested in President by sections 34 to 39 of this title, to Federal Communications Commission, see section 5(a) of Ex. Ord. No. 10530, eff. May 10, 1954, 19 F.R. 2709, set out under section 301 of Title 3, The President.
#### § 92.358 Consultant activities.

No person providing consultant services in an employer-employee type relationship shall receive more than a reasonable rate of compensation for personal services paid with HOME funds. In no event, however, shall such compensation exceed the limits in effect under the provisions of any applicable statute (e.g., annual HUD appropriations acts which have set the limit at the equivalent of the daily rate paid for Level IV of the Executive Schedule, see the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1997, Pub. L. 104-204 (September 26, 1996)). Such services shall be evidenced by written agreements between the parties which detail the responsibilities, standards, and compensation. Consultant services provided under an independent contractor relationship are not subject to the compensation limitation of Level IV of the Executive Schedule.

[62 FR 28930, May 28, 1997]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3020 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3020

    To extend the existence of the Parole Commission, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 22, 2005

    Mr. Sensenbrenner (for himself and Mr. Conyers) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the existence of the Parole Commission, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``United States Parole Commission 
Extension and Sentencing Commission Authority Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EXISTENCE OF THE PAROLE COMMISSION.

    For purposes of section 235(b) of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 
(98 Stat. 2032) as such section relates to chapter 311 of title 18, 
United States Code, and the United States Parole Commission, each 
reference in such section to ``eighteen years'' or ``eighteen-year 
period'' shall be deemed a reference to ``21 years'' or ``21-year 
period'', respectively.

SEC. 3. PROVISION OF EMERGENCY AMENDMENT AUTHORITY FOR SENTENCING 
              COMMISSION.

     In accordance with the procedure set forth in section 21(a) of the 
Sentencing Act of 1987 (Public Law 100-182), as though the authority 
under that Act had not expired, the United States Sentencing Commission 
shall--
            (1) not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment 
        of this Act, amend the Federal sentencing guidelines, 
        commentary, and policy statements to implement section 6703 of 
        the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 
        (Public Law 108-458); and
            (2) not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment 
        of this Act, amend the Federal sentencing guidelines, 
        commentary, and policy statements to implement section 3 of the 
        Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-358).
                                 <all>
```
### §404. Temporary increase in employers' contribution rate

Notwithstanding the provisions of section 358(a)2 1 of this title, the rate of contribution required to be paid under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act [45 U.S.C. 351 et seq.] by every employer as defined in such Act shall be 4 per centum with respect to compensation as defined in such Act, paid after December 31, 1961, and before January 1, 1964.

(Pub. L. 87–7, §5, Mar. 24, 1961, 75 Stat. 17.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 358(a) of this title, referred to in text, was amended generally by Pub. L. 100–647, title VII, §7102(a), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3759, and, as so amended, does not contain a cl. "2".

The Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act, referred to in text, is act June 25, 1938, ch. 680, 52 Stat. 1094, which is classified principally to chapter 11 (§351 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 367 of this title and Tables.

1 See References in Text note below.
### §1063. Obstruction of settlement on or transit over public lands

No person, by force, threats, intimidation, or by any fencing or inclosing, or any other unlawful means, shall prevent or obstruct, or shall combine and confederate with others to prevent or obstruct, any person from peaceably entering upon or establishing a settlement or residence on any tract of public land subject to settlement or entry under the public land laws of the United States, or shall prevent or obstruct free passage or transit over or through the public lands: Provided, This section shall not be held to affect the right or title of persons, who have gone upon, improved, or occupied said lands under the land laws of the United States, claiming title thereto, in good faith.

(Feb. 25, 1885, ch. 149, §3, 23 Stat. 322.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The public land laws of the United States, referred to in text, are classified generally to this title.
### §326. Censorship

Nothing in this chapter shall be understood or construed to give the Commission the power of censorship over the radio communications or signals transmitted by any radio station, and no regulation or condition shall be promulgated or fixed by the Commission which shall interfere with the right of free speech by means of radio communication.

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title III, §326, 48 Stat. 1091; June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §21, 62 Stat. 862.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, 48 Stat. 1064, known as the Communications Act of 1934, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 609 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1948—Act June 25, 1948, repealed last sentence relating to use of indecent language. See section 1464 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1948 Amendment

Amendment by act June 25, 1948, effective as of Sept. 1, 1948, see section 20 of that act.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 20-0748V

UNPUBLISHED

MELISSA SCHNELL,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: August 27, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Tetanus Diphtheria 

acellular Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for 

Petitioner.

Wei Kit Tai, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On June 23, 2020, Melissa Schnell filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2(the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”), a defined Table injury, after receiving the tetanus, diphtheria, 

acellular pertussis vaccine on July 3, 2019. Petition at 1, ¶ 7. Petitioner further alleges 

that she suffered the residual effects of her SIRVA for more than six months and that 

neither she nor any other party has filed a civil action or received compensation for her 

SIRVA. Id. at ¶¶ 7-8. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office 

of Special Masters.

1 Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

On August 27, 2021, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 

1. Specifically, Respondent has “concluded that [P]etitioner’s claim meets the Table 

criteria for SIRVA.” Id. at 3. Regarding the other statutory and jurisdictional requirements, 

Respondent further agrees that “entitlement to compensation is appropriate under the 

terms of the Vaccine Act.” Id.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

VOLODYMYR STEPANENKO

, Appellant,

v.

PAULO FASSMAN CORREIA, ET AL.

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 702

[ April 6, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Jeffrey R. Levenson , Judge; L.T. Case No.

PRC2000003131

.

Morgan L. Weinstein of Twig, Trade, & Tribunal, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale,

for appellant.

Scott A. Weiss and R. Daniel Sirois of Scott A. Weiss, P.A., Fort

Lauderdale, for appellee.

P E R C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, C IKLIN and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### Archive of digital boomer and chirp seismic reflection data collected during USGS Cruises 01RCE05 and 02RCE01 in the Lower Atchafalaya River, Mississippi River Delta, and offshore southeastern Louisiana, October 23-30, 2001, and August 18-19, 2002

By: Karynna CalderonShawn V. DadismanJack L. KindingerJames G. Flocks**Nicholas F. FerinaDana S. Wiese

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds95

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area
<PAGE>   1

                                                                EXHIBIT 10.46




                     AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         AMENDMENT, dated as of May 15, 1997, between Ticketmaster Corporation,
an Illinois corporation (the "Company"), and Alan Citron ("Executive").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

         WHEREAS, the Company and Executive are parties to that certain
Employment Agreement, dated as of December __, 1994 (the "Agreement"), relative
to Executive's employment by the Company; and

         WHEREAS, the Company and Executive have agreed to make certain
amendments to the Agreement;

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the mutual covenants
and agreements contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby mutually acknowledged, the parties
hereto agree as follows:

         1.  Definitions.  Terms defined in the Agreement shall have
the same meaning when used in this Amendment, unless the context
requires otherwise.

         2. Extension of the Term. The term of the Agreement is hereby extended
for a period of three additional years, commencing on February 1, 1998 and
ending on January 31, 2001. The Contract Years ending on January 31, 1999,
January 31, 2000 and January 31, 2001 are hereinafter referred to as the "Fourth
Contract Year", "Fifth Contract Year" and "Sixth Contract Year", respectively.

         3.  Position and Duties.  The first sentence of Section 4 of the
Agreement is hereby deleted and the following sentence is substituted
therefor:  "Executive shall serve as a Senior Vice President of the Company and
President and Chief Operating Officer of Ticketmaster Multimedia Holdings, 
Inc.".

         4.  Base Salary Amount During Extension Period.  The Base
Salary Amount during the extension period shall be $250,000 during
the Fourth Contract Year, $275,000 during the Fifth Contract Year
and $300,000 during the Sixth Contract Year.

         5.  Car Allowance. The automobile allowance specified in Section
6(d) is hereby increased from $5,000 per year, payable monthly, in advance,
to $8400 per year, payable monthly, in advance.            

         6.  Continued Effectiveness of Agreement.  Except as
expressly set forth herein, the Agreement shall continue in full
force and effect in accordance with its terms and provisions
thereof.
<PAGE>   2
         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Executive have executed this
Agreement as of the date and year first written above.

                                         TICKETMASTER CORPORATION

                                         By:  /s/ Fredric D. Rosen
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Title:   President
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              /s/ Alan Citron
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Alan Citron
### §3301. Definition of records

(a) Records Defined.—

(1) In general.—As used in this chapter, the term "records"—

(A) includes all recorded information, regardless of form or characteristics, made or received by a Federal agency under Federal law or in connection with the transaction of public business and preserved or appropriate for preservation by that agency or its legitimate successor as evidence of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, operations, or other activities of the United States Government or because of the informational value of data in them; and

(B) does not include—

(i) library and museum material made or acquired and preserved solely for reference or exhibition purposes; or

(ii) duplicate copies of records preserved only for convenience.

(2) Recorded information defined.—For purposes of paragraph (1), the term "recorded information" includes all traditional forms of records, regardless of physical form or characteristics, including information created, manipulated, communicated, or stored in digital or electronic form.

(b) Determination of Definition.—The Archivist's determination whether recorded information, regardless of whether it exists in physical, digital, or electronic form, is a record as defined in subsection (a) shall be binding on all Federal agencies.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1299; Pub. L. 94–575, §4(c)(2), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2727; Pub. L. 113–187, §5(a), Nov. 26, 2014, 128 Stat. 2009.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §366 (July 7, 1943, ch. 192, §1, 57 Stat. 380).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–187 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "As used in this chapter, 'records' includes all books, papers, maps, photographs, machine readable materials, or other documentary materials, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by an agency of the United States Government under Federal law or in connection with the transaction of public business and preserved or appropriate for preservation by that agency or its legitimate successor as evidence of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, operations, or other activities of the Government or because of the informational value of data in them. Library and museum material made or acquired and preserved solely for reference or exhibition purposes, extra copies of documents preserved only for convenience of reference, and stocks of publications and of processed documents are not included."

1976—Pub. L. 94–575 expanded "records" to include "machine readable materials".
September 22, 2015

Mr. Robert Scaglione

Chief Inspector / DQC

Eastern Air Lines

Miami International Airport

4200 NW 36th Street, Bldg. 5A

Miami, FL 33165

Dear Mr. Scaglione:

This is in response to your September 14, 2015, letter sent to the public docket (No. FAA2015-3895) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration on behalf of Eastern Air Lines

(EAL) for an exemption from § 121.1117(e)(1) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations

(14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would exempt EAL from the requirements of § 

121.1117 to meet the 50% fleet compliance requirement for installation of Flammability 

Reduction Means (FRM).

On the compliance date of December 26, 2014, EAL had no compliance requirement because 

it was not certificated until May 13, 2015. Once certificated, EAL’s fleet consisted of one 

airplane subject to § 129.1117(e)(1). That airplane met the FRM requirements of § 129.1117 

on the date of certification. However, § 129.1117 did not technically apply to EAL as it

requires a minimum of two aircraft to be in a fleet. On July 29, 2015, EAL added a second 

aircraft to its fleet, which did not meet the FRM requirements of § 129.1117, bringing EAL 

fleet compliance rate to 50%.

The December 26, 2014, 50% compliance date of § 121.1117(e)(1) was a “snapshot” in time

and should not be viewed as a rolling requirement after that deadline. EAL does not need to 

maintain the 50% number as its fleet changes between now and the December 26, 2017, 

100% fleet requirement per § 121.1117(e)(2) and (m). However, any airplane added to EAL’s

fleet after the December 26 2014, compliance date that is not in compliance with the FRM 

requirements will require FRM retrofit by December 26, 2017.

Because the relief you seek does not require an exemption, we will take no further action on 

your petition.

Sincerely,
2

/s/

John Barbagallo

Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service
§ 970.17 Specific criteria for HUD approval of disposition requests. In addition to other applicable requirements of this part, HUD will approve a request for disposition by sale or other transfer of a public housing project or other real property if the PHA certifies that the retention of the property is not in the best interests of the residents or the PHA for at least one of the following reasons, unless information available to HUD is inconsistent with the certification: ( a ) Conditions in the area surrounding the project (density, or industrial or commercial development) adversely affect the health or safety of the tenants or the feasible operation of the project by the PHA;
( b ) Disposition allows the acquisition, development, or rehabilitation of other properties that will be more efficiently or effectively operated as low-income housing developments;
( c ) The PHA has otherwise determined the disposition to be appropriate for reasons that are consistent with the goals of the PHA and the PHA Plan and that are otherwise consistent with the Act;
( d ) In the case of disposition of property other than dwelling units (community facilities or vacant land), the PHA certifies that: ( 1 ) The non-dwelling facilities or land exceeds the needs of the development (after DOFA); or
( 2 ) The disposition of the property is incidental to, or does not interfere with, continued operation of the remaining portion of the development.