alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §329. Administration of radio laws in Territories and possessions

The Commission is authorized to designate any officer or employee of any other department of the Government on duty in any Territory or possession of the United States to render therein such service in connection with the administration of this chapter as the Commission may prescribe and also to designate any officer or employee of any other department of the Government to render such services at any place within the United States in connection with the administration of this subchapter as may be necessary: Provided, That such designation shall be approved by the head of the department in which such person is employed.

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title III, §329, 48 Stat. 1092; May 20, 1937, ch. 229, §9, 50 Stat. 191.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, 48 Stat. 1064, known as the Communications Act of 1934, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 609 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1937—Act May 20, 1937, struck out provisions which prohibited designation of officers and employees in the Philippine Islands and Canal Zone and inserted provisions permitting designation of officers and employees within the United States.
#### GREGORY v. ELMIRA WATER, LIGHT & R. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

January 4, 1905.)

Action by Chester H. Gregory against the Elmira Water, Light & Railroad Company. No opinion. Motion denied.
Attachment A-5. School Mailing Verification Telephone Script

Hello! I’m calling from REL Southwest. Last week was the deadline for mailing out the 

information materials for the HB 5 mathematics course study. We haven’t received your mailing 

verification envelope yet, so we wanted to take a few minutes to follow-up with you. In 

particular, we wanted to address any problems you may have come across when preparing and 

mailing the materials. First, have already mailed your study materials? If so, when did you mail 

them? If not, when will you be able to mail them?

Potential additional follow-up questions to be addressed based on responses to the above 

questions:

Have you received your box of study materials? 

Do you have enough study materials?

Are you having difficulty with preparing the study materials?

Is there any additional information or assistance you need in order to mail the study materials. 

Thank you for helping out with this important study!
### §1402. Rule of construction

Each range of frequencies described in this chapter shall be construed to be inclusive of the upper and lower frequencies in the range.

(Pub. L. 112–96, title VI, §6002, Feb. 22, 2012, 126 Stat. 204.)
Editorial Note on Part 982
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999, and at 89 FR 38293, May 7, 2024.

§ 982.510 Other fees and charges. ( a ) The cost of meals or supportive services may not be included in the rent to owner, and the value of meals or supportive services may not be included in the calculation of reasonable rent.
( b ) The lease may not require the tenant or family members to pay charges for meals or supportive services. Non-payment of such charges is not grounds for termination of tenancy.
( c ) The owner may not charge the tenant extra amounts for items customarily included in rent in the locality, or provided at no additional cost to unsubsidized tenants in the premises.
[63 FR 23861, Apr. 30, 1998. Redesignated at 64 FR 26648, May 14, 1999]
### §227b–1. Access to number resources

#### (a) In general

#### (1) Examination of FCC policies

Not later than 180 days after December 30, 2019, the Commission shall commence a proceeding to determine how Commission policies regarding access to number resources, including number resources for toll-free and non-toll-free telephone numbers, could be modified, including by establishing registration and compliance obligations, and requirements that providers of voice service given access to number resources take sufficient steps to know the identity of the customers of such providers, to help reduce access to numbers by potential perpetrators of violations of section 227(b) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 227(b)).

#### (2) Regulations

If the Commission determines under paragraph (1) that modifying the policies described in that paragraph could help achieve the goal described in that paragraph, the Commission shall prescribe regulations to implement those policy modifications.

#### (b) Authority

Any person who knowingly, through an employee, agent, officer, or otherwise, directly or indirectly, by or through any means or device whatsoever, is a party to obtaining number resources, including number resources for toll-free and non-toll-free telephone numbers, from a common carrier regulated under title II of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 201 et seq.), in violation of a regulation prescribed under subsection (a), shall, notwithstanding section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5)), be subject to a forfeiture penalty under section 503(b) of that Act (47 U.S.C. 503(b)). A forfeiture penalty under this subsection shall be in addition to any other penalty provided for by law.

(Pub. L. 116–105, §6, Dec. 30, 2019, 133 Stat. 3282.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Communications Act of 1934, referred to in subsec. (b), is act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, 48 Stat. 1064. Title II of the Act is classified generally to this subchapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 609 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Pallone-Thune Telephone Robocall Abuse Criminal Enforcement and Deterrence Act, also known as the Pallone-Thune TRACED Act, and not as part of the Communications Act of 1934 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definition

For definition of "Commission" as used in this section, see section 2 of Pub. L. 116–105, set out as a note under section 227 of this title.
### §303b. Consideration of children's television service in broadcast license renewal

(a) After the standards required by section 303a of this title are in effect, the Commission shall, in its review of any application for renewal of a commercial or noncommercial television broadcast license, consider the extent to which the licensee—

(1) has complied with such standards; and

(2) has served the educational and informational needs of children through the licensee's overall programming, including programming specifically designed to serve such needs.

(b) In addition to consideration of the licensee's programming as required under subsection (a), the Commission may consider—

(1) any special nonbroadcast efforts by the licensee which enhance the educational and informational value of such programming to children; and

(2) any special efforts by the licensee to produce or support programming broadcast by another station in the licensee's marketplace which is specifically designed to serve the educational and informational needs of children.

(Pub. L. 101–437, title I, §103, Oct. 17, 1990, 104 Stat. 997; Pub. L. 102–356, §15, Aug. 26, 1992, 106 Stat. 954; Pub. L. 103–414, title III, §303(c), Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4296.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Children's Television Act of 1990, and not as part of the Communications Act of 1934 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–414 substituted "noncommercial" for "noncommerical".

1992—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–356 inserted reference to commercial or noncommercial television broadcast licenses.
#### § 8.30 Rental rehabilitation program.

Each grantee or state recipient in the rental rehabilitation program shall, subject to the priority in 24 CFR 511.10(l) and in accordance with other requirements in 24 CFR part 511, give priority to the selection of projects that will result in dwelling units being made readily accessible to and usable by individuals with handicaps.

[53 FR 20233, June 2, 1988; 53 FR 28115, July 26, 1988]
Exhibit 32.2



18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification



In connection with the Annual Report of NGP Capital Resources Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard A. Bernardy, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|              |  |                                                                      
|------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|              | 
|April 8, 2005 |  | /s/    RICHARD A.
BERNARDY                                           
|              |  | Richard A. Bernardy, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
|             



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NGP Capital Resources Company and will be retained by NGP Capital Resources Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Max Adamowski, appellee, v. August G. Urbanski and Otto G. Riedel, appellants.

Gen. No. 27,902.

Claim for real estate commissions. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Charles Schaefer, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed October 17, 1923.

Rehearing denied November 2, 1923.

George W. Thoma and E. Marshall Amberg, for appellants. Steve Adamowski, for appellee; James J. Danaher, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Thomson

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §6305. Reports of investigations

(a) The Secretary shall prescribe regulations about the form and manner of reports of investigations conducted under this part.

(b) Reports of investigations conducted under this part shall be made available to the public. This subsection does not require the release of information described by section 552(b) of title 5 or protected from disclosure by another law of the United States.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 538; Pub. L. 105–383, title III, §305, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3420.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 6305 | 46:239(g)46:239(k) |

46:239(k)

Section 6305 requires the Secretary to prescribe regulations about the form and manner of reports of investigations of marine casualties. It also provides that the reports shall be available to the public, except for any information they contain related to national security.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 105–383 substituted ". This subsection does not require the release of information described by section 552(b) of title 5 or protected from disclosure by another law of the United States." for ", except to the extent that they contain information related to the national security."
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-12-00642-CR

EX PARTE Mary S. ROBERTS

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2006CR6404A-W2

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the order of the trial court is 

REVERSED. We REMAND this cause to the trial court with instructions to grant habeas corpus 

relief and to delete the provision in Roberts’s “Terms and Conditions of Community Supervision” 

requiring Roberts to pay “restitution joint and severed with defendant in 2006CR6404B.”

SIGNED July 17, 2013.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
### **CHAPTER 535—CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUNDS**

Sec.
53501.
Definitions.
53502.
Regulations.
53503.
Establishing a capital construction fund.
53504.
Deposits and withdrawals.
53505.
Ceiling on deposits.
53506.
Investment and fiduciary requirements.
53507.
Nontaxation of deposits.
53508.
Separate accounts within a fund.
53509.
Qualified withdrawals.
53510.
Tax treatment of qualified withdrawals and basis of property.
53511.
Tax treatment of nonqualified withdrawals.
53512.
FIFO and LIFO withdrawals.
53513.
Corporate reorganizations and partnership changes.
53514.
Relationship of old fund to new fund.
53515.
Records and reports.
53516.
Termination of agreement after change in regulations.
53517.
Reports.
### §1486. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–826, §3, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 953

Section, acts Apr. 29, 1902, ch. 637, 32 Stat. 172; Feb. 14, 1903, ch. 552, §10, 32 Stat. 829; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §1, 37 Stat. 736; May 17, 1932, ch. 190, 47 Stat. 158; Proc. No. 2695 eff. July 4, 1946, 11 F.R. 7517, 60 Stat. 1352; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §§101–104, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7877, 60 Stat. 1097; Apr. 7, 1948, ch. 177, 62 Stat. 161, provided that law as to clearance and entry of vessels was applicable to trade between the United States and noncontiguous Territories, etc.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal of section effective 180 days after Oct. 15, 1962, see section 4 of Pub. L. 87–826.
SENATE 109th Congress 

2d Session 

S. Report 

109–331 

REPORT 

of the 

SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE 

on 

POSTWAR FINDINGS ABOUT IRAQ’S WMD PROGRAMS AND 

LINKS TO TERRORISM AND HOW THEY COMPARE WITH 

PREWAR ASSESSMENTS 

together with 

ADDITIONAL AND MINORITY VIEWS 

September 8, 2006.—Ordered to be printed 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with REPORTS
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T DI LI PKUM AR NA GI NBHA I PATE L, a .k .a . D ilp ku m arN o

jinb yP a te l; JA Y A B E N R A T IL A L P A T E L , a. k. a. J iab in R ak ila l P a te l, P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 70375 A ge nc yN os . A 070- 805- 804

A 070- 805- 805 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A ugus t8, 2012 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , B E R Z O N , an dIK U T A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. D i l i pkum arN a gi nbha i P a t e l and J ay abe n R a t i l a l P at e l , na t i ve s and c i t i z e ns of Indi a, pet i t i on for r evi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order 

# FI LED AU G 15 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 70375 2 d e n y in g th e irm o tio n to r e o p e n . W e h av e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the de ni a l of am ot i on t o r e ope n, and r e vi e w de novo du e p r o c e s s c la im s . Moh am m ed v. G on zales , 40 0 F . 3d78 5, 79 1-92 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 5 ) . W e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g p e titio n e r s ’ m o tio n to r e o p e n w h e r e th e yd idn o t e s tab lis h th a t f o rm e rc o u n s e l’s f

a ilu r e to s ub m it e v i d e n c e o f

l e a dp e t i t i o n e r ’ s p o l i t i c a l a c t i v i t i e s w o u l dh av e a f f e c t e dth e o u t c o me th e irp r o c e e d in g s . Se e id . a t793- 94 ( pr e j udi c e r e s ul t s w he n pe r f orm anc e of c ouns e l w a s s o i na de qua t e tha ti tm ayhave a f f e c t e d the out c om e of

the p r o c e e d in g s ) . I n l i ghtof

ourdi s pos i t i on, w e ne e d notr e a c h pe t i t i one r s ’ r e m a i ni ng co n t en t i o n s. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
Editorial Note on Part 1206
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1206 (formerly part 206) appear at 67 FR 19111, Apr. 18, 2002.

§ 1206.64 What records must I keep to support my calculations of value under this subpart? If you determine the value of your oil under this subpart, you must retain all data relevant to the determination of royalty value. ( a ) You must show: ( 1 ) How you calculated the value that you reported, including all adjustments for location, quality, and transportation.
( 2 ) How you complied with these rules.
( b ) On request, you must make available sales, volume, and transportation data for production that you sold, purchased, or obtained from the field or area. You must make this data available to ONRR, Indian representatives, or other authorized persons.
( c ) You can find recordkeeping requirements in §§ 1207.5, 1212.50, and 1212.51 of this chapter.
( d ) ONRR, Indian representatives, or other authorized persons may review and audit your data, and ONRR will direct you to use a different value if they determine that the reported value is inconsistent with the requirements of this subpart.
**EXHIBIT
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned executive officers of Kentucky First Federal Bancorp (the
“Registrant”) hereby certify that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
      ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.





By:
            /s/
                Tony D. WhitakerName:
            Tony
                D. WhitakerTitle:
            Chief
                Executive Officer and ChairmanBy:
            /s/
                R. Clay HuletteName:
            R.
                Clay HuletteTitle:
            Vice
                President, Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer





Date:
      September 29, 2008
================================================================================

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual Report of QUANTUM ENEGY,  INC. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended February 28, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Bruce Ellsworth,
President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information  contained in this Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  June 12, 2006

By: /s/ Bruce Ellsworth
-----------------------
Name: Bruce Ellsworth
Title:    President (Principal Executive Officer)
### §§44 to 46. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 44 to 46 were transferred to sections 1201 to 1203, respectively, of former Title 49, Transportation, and were subsequently repealed and restated in section 80504 of Title 49, Transportation, by Pub. L. 103–272, §§1(e), 7(b), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1358, 1379.

Section 44, acts Feb. 23, 1905, ch. 744, §1, 33 Stat. 743; June 13, 1957, Pub. L. 85–50, §1(1), 71 Stat. 69, related to awards for acts of heroism involving railroads or motor vehicles.

Section 45, act Feb. 23, 1905, ch. 744, §2, 33 Stat. 743, related to issuance of rosettes and ribbons.

Section 46, acts Feb. 23, 1905, ch. 744, §3, 33 Stat. 743; June 13, 1957, Pub. L. 85–50, §1(2), 71 Stat. 69, related to authorization of appropriations for carrying out sections 44 and 45 of this title.
**From:** Jack Kennedy

**Sent:** Friday, July 14, 2006 11:37 AM **To:** Richard Hardegger **Cc:** Lori L. Stegink **Subject:** FW: Scrubber Cost Estimate Rich: Per our discussion this morning; here's the info I got on 90% SO2 control scrubbers for the taconite BART Stud y. Bottom line is that 90% is achievable in one scrubber, but it will need to be larger tha n standard venturi rod scrubber to get the contact time needed for 90% control. I'll add and adjustment to our pelletizer scrubber costs in the BACT report. J ack___________________________________________ **From:** Jack Kennedy **Sent:** Monday, July 10, 2006 11:21 AM **To:** Tony Shoberg; Teresa L. Kinder **Cc:** Erik Boleman; Beth Havlik **Subject:** Scrubber Cost Estimate

I talked to Hal Taylor, STS Consultants, and John Chitjian, Jardar Systems, regarding 90% SO2 control from taconite furnaces. Both worked on the scrubber replacements at Minntac and Keetac. To achieve 90% control, assume a second scrubber is needed with an equipment cost of $3.7M per scrubber, including ancillary equipment. This cost is for a system rated at 500,000 acfm. It is based on the scrubbers (2) installed at Keetac. Use the 0.6 exponent factor to adjust for other sizes. My notes show Keetac at 850,000 acfm vs. scrubber design of 1,000,000 acfm. So, we should probably include 15% extra flow capacity for the other facilities when calculating the cost.Additional notes:

1) Existing scrubbers do not have sufficient residence time, water flows and reagent concentrations needed to achieve 90% control. Hal thought 90% could be achieved with system upgrades. John was less optimistic about achieving 90%; so, we should add some caveats on setting permit limits as 90% control efficiency 2) Per Hal at STS, it would be possible to achieve 90% con trol if an additional contact chamber is added. This could be done by enlarging the existing scrubber or adding a second scrubber. Hal suggested a horizontal spray scrubber with mist eliminators downstream of the existing venturi rod scrubbers. A liquid /gas ratio of 40/1 is needed; so larger pumps and piping would be required. In addition, the lime concentration in the scrubbing water needs to be increased. So, the lime slurry systems would need to be upgraded. Hal suggested that the scrubber cost wo uld represent 25% of the total cost needed for the upgrade. The scrubber tower for a lime scrubbing system located at a green field site is 15% of total equipment cost. Hal estimated the equipment cost of a second scrubber to be $800K - $900K. Use of the 0.6 exponent factor to estimate the cost of scrubbers rates at other flow rate would be an acceptable way to estimate costs for the other taconite furnaces. 3) A second scrubber with mist eliminators would add 5' - 6' of pressure drop; so a blower upgrad e would be needed. The Keetac blowers were $290 each. 4) Total equipment cost based on information above is: $3.7MM = $850K/0.25 + $300K (for blower) Jack Kennedy Barr Engineering Co. Phone 952 - 832 - 2913 Cell 612 - 310 - 5072 Em ail jkennedy@barr.com