alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
42° 30’ 00"

Wl
ait

bo 8S. 00" 00" =: — = vaaeae' 00%.
42° 30° Q0" (Neg SS ye aoe

= Se?

Zz

42% 24’ 00"

42524 0) a : 3 al

)

= iG

rs i: Xe
ees

5 sa
| iy
| (
Lo
we) i] N

| \¢ ee (ae
oe vee Pgs Wi?
| 42°18! Onf © NSS Has 6
| iE

yo ee
SHE

Sef

i ax (h
Wee )

ie

i {
is
3
=
2s 2
E@ a)
a Zz
g c
22 =
]
|
|
|
I
if
42°06 00”
|
{
|
| is
og o
2R: 2
Be Zz
Z G)
_— 3 Zz
g S
z
jesi
m

| | GOLD BEACH N420124w

, | | | - | | | ~ SCALE: 1:100000
: . . oO NOS MULTIBEAM SURVEYS
Contours in corrected meters

oo LM95 oe |
OQ) |
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 232 (Wednesday, December 2, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77455-77456]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26531]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD


Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.

ACTION: Notice of members of senior executive service performance 
review board.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the membership of the Defense Nuclear 
Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) Senior Executive Service (SES) 
Performance Review Board (PRB).

DATES: These appointments were effective on October 20, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Send comments concerning this notice to: Defense Nuclear 
Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue NW, Suite 700, Washington, 
DC 20004-2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vanessa D. Prout by telephone at (202) 
694-7021 or by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bfe9ded1daccccdeefffdbd1d9ccdd91d8d0c9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e3b5828d86909082b3a3878d859081cd848c95">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 5 U.S.C. 4314 (c)(1) through (5) requires 
each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by 
the Office of Personnel Management, one or more performance review 
boards. The PRB shall review and evaluate the initial summary rating of 
the senior executives' performance, the executives' responses, and the 
higher level officials' comments on the initial summary rating. In 
addition, the PRB will review and recommend executive performance 
bonuses and pay increases.

[[Page 77456]]

    The DNFSB is a small, independent Federal agency; therefore, the 
members of the DNFSB SES Performance Review Board listed in this notice 
are drawn from the SES ranks of other agencies. The following persons 
comprise a standing roster to serve as members of the Defense Nuclear 
Facilities Safety Board SES Performance Review Board:

Dolline L. Hatchett, Director, Office of Safety Recommendations and 
Communications, National Transportation Safety Board
Jessica S. Bartlett, Regional Director, Federal Labor Relations 
Authority, Washington Regional Office
Catherine Haney, Assistant for Operations, Office of the Executive 
Director for Operations, Nuclear Regulation Commission

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 4314.

    Dated: November 25, 2020.
Thomas A. Summers,
Acting Chairman.
[FR Doc. 2020-26531 Filed 12-1-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3670-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2978 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2978

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 17, 2006

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To allow the Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian 
  Reservation to enter into a lease or other temporary conveyance of 
  water rights recognized under the Fort Peck-Montana Compact for the 
   purpose of meeting the water needs of the Dry Prairie Rural Water 
           Association, Incorporated, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MONTANA INDIAN TRIBES; AGREEMENT WITH DRY PRAIRIE RURAL 
              WATER ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED.

    (a) In General.--The Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck 
Indian Reservation (referred to in this section as the ``Tribes'') may, 
with the approval of the Secretary of the Interior, enter into a lease 
or other temporary conveyance of water rights recognized under the Fort 
Peck-Montana Compact (Montana Code Annotated 85-20-201) for the purpose 
of meeting the water needs of the Dry Prairie Rural Water Association, 
Incorporated (or any successor entity), in accordance with section 5 of 
the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System Act of 2000 (Public Law 
106-382; 114 Stat. 1454).
    (b) Conditions of Lease.--With respect to a lease or other 
temporary conveyance described in subsection (a)--
            (1) the term of the lease or conveyance shall not exceed 
        100 years;
            (2) the lease or conveyance may be approved by the 
        Secretary of the Interior without monetary compensation to the 
        Tribes; and
            (3) the Secretary of the Interior shall not be subject to 
        liability for any claim or cause of action relating to the 
        compensation or consideration received by the Tribes under the 
        lease or conveyance.
    (c) No Permanent Alienation of Water.--Nothing in this section 
authorizes any permanent alienation of any water by the Tribes.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 16, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Document

EXHIBIT 10.5

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION 
2017 AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN


    This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”), dated as of October 20, 2022 (the “Effective Date”) hereby amends that certain EchoStar Corporation 2017 Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Plan.


    WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Plan, pursuant to which eligible employees may purchase shares of EchoStar Corporation Class A common stock (“Shares”) at a discount price;


    WHEREAS, as currently drafted, the Plan does not require participants to retain Shares purchased pursuant to the Plan for any specified period of time following the date upon which they are purchased; 


    WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 25 of the Plan, the Board has the authority to amend the Plan at any time, so long as such amendment does not affect Shares already purchased under the Plan; and


    WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is advisable and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to amend the Plan such that any Shares purchased on the Purchase Date of any Offering Period that commences following the Effective Date must be retained for at least 180 days following such Purchase Date.


    NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


1.Section 14 of the Plan (“Non-Transferability”) is hereby amended and restated in full, as follows:


“14.    NON-TRANSFERABILITY. Prior to a Purchase Date, a Participant’s rights under the Plan may not be transferred in any manner otherwise than by will or the laws of descent and distribution and shall be exercisable during the lifetime of the Participant only by the Participant. Subsequent to a Purchase Date, a Participant shall be allowed to sell or otherwise dispose of the Shares acquired on any prior Purchase Date in any manner that he or she deems fit; provided, however, that with respect to Shares acquired on a Purchase Date for any Offering Period commencing after October 20, 2022, a Participant shall be prohibited from selling or otherwise disposing of the Shares acquired on any Purchase Date for the first 180 days following such Purchase Date. Furthermore, the Company, in its absolute discretion, may impose such additional restrictions on the transferability of Shares purchased by a Participant pursuant to the Plan as it deems appropriate and any such restriction may be placed on the certificates evidencing such Shares or otherwise evidenced on the records with respect to uncertificated Shares (see also Sections 9(d) and 18 of the Plan).”
2.Except as expressly modified herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. The Plan, together with this Amendment, sets forth the entire agreement and understanding of the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof, and supersede any and all prior agreements or understandings, whether written or oral, relating to the matters set forth herein and therein.
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## N AVY



## – M ARINE 

## C ORPS 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_________________________ No. 201 7 0 0 350

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.


### MICHAEL A. SCHOLLENBERGER Lance Corporal (E

- 3 ) , U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

___________________

______ Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Major Terrance J. Reese, USMC

. Convening Authority: Command ing Officer, Headquarters and Support Battalion, School of Infantry East, Training Command, Camp Lejeune, NC

. Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation : Major N icholas A. Martz, USMC. For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander Paul D. Jenkins , JAGC, USN

.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq

.

_________________________ Decided 8 February 2018

_________________________ Before M ARKS , J ONES , and G ERDING , Appellate Military Ju dges

_________________________ After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL Clerk of Court
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Nicholas Caruso, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent

Appeal by the claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which affirmed the Referee’s finding that claimant’s refusal to obey orders which provoked his discharge was unjustified and thus constituted a voluntary leaving of employment without good cause disqualifying claimant from benefits (Unemployment Insurance Law, § 593, subd. 1, par. [a] [Labor Law, art. 18]). On April 17, 1961 claimant, a stowman, was directed by his foreman to load some bales weighing from 200 to 300 pounds into a box ear with two other men. Claimant requested the assistance of another experienced man and when the foreman declined to assign another man to the job claimant refused to lift the bales. When claimant persisted in his refusal to carry out the order of the foreman he was discharged by the terminal supervisor. A hearing was subsequently held with a representative of claimant’s union at which the dismissal was upheld. Claimant first explained his refusal to carry out the order on the grounds that he was afraid that he would get hurt due to the fact that the two “ boys ” with whom he was assigned to load the bales were inexperienced. Later before the Referee, however, he testified he suffered from epilepsy, about which he stated he had not informed his employer for fear of discharge or the Unemployment Insurance Interviewer because he feared it would prejudice his chance to get other employment, and that, in fact, he had had an “ attack ” just prior to the incident here involved which left him in such a weakened condition that he feared if he attempted to stow the heavy bales his fellow employees might be injured. Claimant testified he tried to tell the terminal supervisor he was sick but was not given the opportunity. The terminal supervisor stated claimant did not tell him he was sick nor did he appear sick. There is no indication that claimant received medical treatment for his “attack” or for his alleged general condition. On the basis of this evidence the Referee after finding that claimant was physically able to do the work in question determined that *1009claimant was correctly disqualified from benefits for voluntarily leaving bis employment without good cause in that his refusal to carry out instructions after being told his refusal to do so would bring about his discharge provoked his discharge and the board affirmed. An employee who without good cause refuses to work and thus provokes his discharge is considered to have voluntarily left employment and is not entitled to unemployment benefits *(Matter of Karman*[Lubin], 2 A D 2d 626, see *Matter of Rodrigues [Catherwood]*16 A D 2d 1003). The question of whether “ good cause ” exists is one of fact *(Matter of Karman, supra,*p. 627) especially where as here it depends on whether claimant was physically able to work. The instant record contains substantial evidence to support the board’s determination on this question. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (FormS-8 No. 333-119994) pertaining to the 2004 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-143679) pertaining to the Special Deferral Election Plan, in the Registration Statements (Form S-8No. 333-150989 and Form S-8 No. 333-160015) pertaining to the 2008 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan and in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 333-138712 and Form S-3 No. 333-145158) and related Prospectus of DreamWorksAnimation SKG, Inc. of our reports dated February 23, 2010 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of DreamWorks Animation SKG, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of DreamWorks Animation SKG,Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009. 

 

/s/    ERNST & YOUNGLLP        

 

Los Angeles,California 

February 23, 2010
### §70115. Long-range vessel tracking system

Not later than April 1, 2007, the Secretary shall, consistent with international treaties, conventions, and agreements to which the United States is a party, develop and implement a long-range automated vessel tracking system for all vessels in United States waters that are equipped with the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System or equivalent satellite technology. The system shall be designed to provide the Secretary the capability of receiving information on vessel positions at interval positions appropriate to deter transportation security incidents. The Secretary may use existing maritime organizations to collect and monitor tracking information under the system.

(Added Pub. L. 107–295, title I, §102(a), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2083; amended Pub. L. 108–293, title VIII, §803(b), Aug. 9, 2004, 118 Stat. 1080; Pub. L. 109–347, title I, §107(a), Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 1891.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–347, in first sentence, substituted "Not later than April 1, 2007, the Secretary" for "The Secretary".

2004—Pub. L. 108–293, in first sentence, substituted "shall, consistent with international treaties, conventions, and agreements to which the United States is a party," for "may".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Regulations

Pub. L. 109–347, title I, §107(b), Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 1891, provided that: "The Secretary [of Homeland Security] may issue regulations to establish a voluntary long-range automated vessel tracking system for vessels described in section 70115 of title 46, United States Code, during the period before regulations are issued under such section."

#### Long-Range Vessel Tracking System

Pub. L. 109–241, title IV, §404, July 11, 2006, 120 Stat. 535, provided that:

"(a) Pilot Project.—The Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating, acting through the Commandant of the Coast Guard, shall conduct a 3-year pilot program for long-range tracking of up to 2,000 vessels using satellite systems with a nonprofit maritime organization that has a demonstrated capability of operating a variety of satellite communications systems providing data to vessel tracking software and hardware that provides long-range vessel information to the Coast Guard to aid maritime security and response to maritime emergencies.

"(b) Authorization of Appropriations.—There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary $4,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2006, 2007, and 2008 to carry out subsection (a)."
Exhibit 31.1


                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Jimmy Whang, certify that:

         1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect
                  of the STRATS(SM) Trust For IBM Corporation Securities,
                  Series 2004-7 (the "Trust") and all reports on Form 8-K
                  containing distribution or servicing reports filed in
                  respect of periods included in the year covered by this
                  annual report of the Trust;

         2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports,
                  taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a
                  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
                  make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
                  under which such statements were made, not misleading as of
                  the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

         3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing
                  information required to be provided to the Depositor by the
                  Trustee under the trust agreement, for inclusion in these
                  reports is included in these reports;

         4.       I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by
                  the Depositor and the Trustee under the trust agreement and
                  based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review
                  required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in
                  the reports, the Depositor and Trustee have each fulfilled
                  its obligations under that agreement; and

         5.       The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating
                  to the compliance by the Trustee and the Depositor with the
                  minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the report
                  provided by an independent public accountant, after
                  conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single
                  Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
                  procedure, as set forth in the trust agreement that is
                  included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, as Trustee.

Date: March 28, 2008

/s/ Jimmy Whang
-------------------------
Name:   Jimmy Whang
Title:  Director
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 238 (Thursday, December 10, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 79501]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27168]



[[Page 79501]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3549-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2020-0001]


Louisiana; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of an Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Louisiana (FEMA-3549-EM), dated October 27, 2020, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued November 16, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this emergency is closed effective October 29, 2020.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Pete Gaynor,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2020-27168 Filed 12-9-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### In the Matter of Peter Santos et al., Appellants, v. Burton S. Goldstein, an Officer of the New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, Respondent.

Order, entered on May 25, 1961 adjudicating that the child “ is neglected ” unanimously affirmed, without costs. The parents, because of religious convictions, refused to give their consent to a blood transfusion. Operative procedure might have made a transfusion essential for the safety of the child. Such refusal warranted the finding of *“*neglect ” within the meaning of section 2 (subd. [17], par. [g] of the New York City Domestic Relations Court Act (see *People ex rel. Wallace*v. *Labrenz,*411 Ill. 618, cert, denied 344 U. S. 824). Such finding, however, does not constitute an adjudication that the parents neglected their child in the ordinary meaning of the word. “ Neglected ” is here used in its legal sense within the meaning of the Domestic Relations Court Act. It in no way imports a finding that these parents failed in their duty to the child in any other respect. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.