alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Elizabeth Thomas, James Allen, Roberto Perez, and Maria De

Jesus Perez

Appellate case number: 01

- 18

- 00580

- CV

Trial court case number: 2017

- 76078

Trial court: 127th District Court of Harris County

Relators’ motion for an emergency stay of trial court proceedings pending determination

of their mandamus petition is DENIED

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ J a ne Bland

Acting individually

Date: July 6, 2018
1 of 13

October 13, 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Lockheed Martin Exemption No. 15987 petition for amendment (operate additional 

aircraft)

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Lockheed Martin Corporation is requesting the addition of the Lockheed Martin Vector Hawk

aircraft to the List of Approved Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) under section 333 at 

regulatory docket FAA-2007-3330 at www.regulations.gov. The Vector Hawk aircraft comes in 

two configurations, the V120 and the V90. Both variants are under 55 pounds and have current, 

valid Experimental Unmanned Aircraft certificates issued by the FAA (N483NY and N483TT). 

Please contact me with any questions.

Respectfully,

Todd Kopl

Subcontract Program Manager

Lockheed Martin Corporation

1801 State Route 17C

Owego, NY 13827

MD 0306

Office: 607-751-6752

Email: todd.kopl@lmco.com
### SUBCHAPTER XLVI—McKAY DAM AND RESERVOIR, UMATILLA PROJECT, OREGON
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALFREDO LEON OREA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

FS SAN FRANCISCO EMPLOYMENT,

INC.’S LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN,

Defendant. /

LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF

NORTH AMERICA,

Real Party in Interest. /

No. C 09-02538 WHA

ORDER RE STIPULATION TO

CONTINUE BRIEFING

SCHEDULE AND HEARING ON

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

This is an ERISA action challenging a denial of disability benefits. Because counsel

for plaintiff is working a reduced schedule for health and personal reasons, the hearing on

defendant’s motion for summary judgment was continued from February 18 to February 25,

2010. The parties have now stipulated to continue the briefing schedule and the hearing in this

matter by an additional week for the same given reason. The continuance is DENIED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE. If they renew their motion, counsel for plaintiff should file a sworn declaration

explaining in detail the reasons why he needs a continuance.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 3, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-02538-WHA Document 20 Filed 02/03/10 Page 1 of 1
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3407 

To provide grants to States and local governments to assess the effectiveness 

of sexual predator electronic monitoring programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2005 

Mr. EMANUEL (for himself, Mr. FILNER, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Ms. CARSON, Ms. SCHWARTZ of Pennsylvania, Mr. BISHOP of New York, Mr. 

LANTOS, Mr. BOSWELL, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. MCHUGH, and Mr. 

OWENS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide grants to States and local governments to assess 

the effectiveness of sexual predator electronic monitoring 

programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Jessica Lunsford and 

5 Sarah Lunde Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SEXUAL PREDATOR MONITORING PROGRAM. 

7 (a) GRANTS AUTHORIZED.— 
2 

•HR 3407 IH 

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General is au2 thorized to award grants (referred to as ‘‘Jessica 

3 Lunsford and Sarah Lunde Grants’’) to State and 

4 local governments to assist such States and local 

5 governments in— 

6 (A) carrying out programs to outfit sexual 

7 offenders with electronic monitoring units; and 

8 (B) the employment of law enforcement of9 ficials necessary to carry out such programs. 

10 (2) DURATION.—The Secretary shall award 

11 grants under this Act for a period not to exceed 3 

12 years. 

13 (b) APPLICATION.— 

14 (1) IN GENERAL.—Each State or local govern15 ment desiring a grant under this Act shall submit an 

16 application to the Attorney General at such time, in 

17 such manner, and accompanied by such information 

18 as the Attorney General may reasonably require. 

19 (2) CONTENTS.—Each application submitted 

20 pursuant to paragraph (1) shall— 

21 (A) describe the activities for which assist22 ance under this Act is sought; and 

23 (B) provide such additional assurances as 

24 the Attorney General determines to be essential 
3 

•HR 3407 IH 

1 to ensure compliance with the requirements of 

2 this Act. 

3 SEC. 3. INNOVATION. 

4 In making grants under this Act, the Attorney Gen5 eral shall ensure that different approaches to monitoring 

6 are funded to allow an assessment of effectiveness. 

7 SEC. 4. DEFINITION. 

8 In this Act, the term ‘‘sexual offender’’ means an of9 fender 18 years of age or older who commits a sexual of10 fense against a minor. 

11 SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

12 (a) IN GENERAL.—There are authorized to be appro13 priated $10,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2006 

14 through 2008 to carry out this Act. 

15 (b) REPORT.—Not later than April 1, 2008, the At16 torney General shall report to Congress— 

17 (1) assessing the effectiveness and value of pro18 grams funded by this Act; 

19 (2) comparing the cost-effectiveness of the elec20 tronic monitoring to reduce sex offenses compared to 

21 other alternatives; and 

22 (3) making recommendations for continuing 

23 funding and the appropriate levels for such funding. 

Æ
### §1703. Superintendent of Documents: assistants, blanks, printing and binding

The Director of the Government Publishing Office, upon the requisition of the Superintendent of Documents, shall appoint necessary assistants, furnish blanks, and do the printing and binding required by his office. The Director of the Government Publishing Office shall provide convenient office, storage, and distributing rooms for the use of the Superintendent of Documents.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1279; Pub. L. 101–520, title II, §208, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 2274; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(c)(1), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §74 (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §66, 28 Stat. 611).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–235 substituted "Director of the Government Publishing Office" for "Public Printer" in two places.

1990—Pub. L. 101–520 struck out before period at end of first sentence ", the cost to be charged against the appropriation for printing and binding for Congress".
#### De Long Corporation v. Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc., et al.

Motion for stay denied, and the stay contained in the order to show cause, dated June 1, 1960, is vacated. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente and Bergan, JJ.
## Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

In re: Robert Troy McClure

No. 06

- 13

- 00117

- CV Original Mandamus Proceeding

Opinion delivered by Justice Carter, Chief

Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley

participating.

As stated in t he Court’s opinion of this date, we find that Relator is not entitled to the

relief sought. Therefore, we deny the petition

.

RENDERED NOVEMBER 19, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SOUTHWEST TECHNOLOGY

INNOVATIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

SYMANTEC CORPORATION,

Defendant /

No. C-09-1063 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO

SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF

DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH

GENERAL ORDER 45 AND THE

COURT’S STANDING ORDERS

On February 16, 2010, defendant electronically filed its Responsive Claim

Construction Brief. Thereafter, on February 17, 2010, defendant, on behalf of both parties,

electronically filed a proposed Stipulated Protective Order. In both instances, defendant

has violated General Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Orders, however, by failing to

deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on the business day following the day that

the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy of each document that is filed

electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the judge’s name,

case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45 § VI.G; see also

Standing Orders for Civil Cases Assigned to the Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Defendant is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

Case 3:09-cv-01063-MMC Document 99 Filed 02/23/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

documents. Defendant is hereby advised that if it fails in the future to comply with General

Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Order to provide a chambers copy of each

electronically-filed document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to,

striking from the record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not

been timely provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 23, 2010 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01063-MMC Document 99 Filed 02/23/10 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets and unaudited condensed
consolidated statements of income found on pages 3, 4 and 5 of the Company's
Form 10-QSB for the year to date, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998 
<CASH>                                       2,190,065
<SECURITIES>                                     5,250
<RECEIVABLES>                                  228,233
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,423,548  
<PP&E>                                         126,631 
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,293,796
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          145,387
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           381
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,302,006
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,293,796
<SALES>                                        348,251
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               357,189
<CGS>                                                0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  203,104
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                81,233
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 72,194 
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,049
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    59,145 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
### Reconnaissance petrographic cross section of the Idaho batholith in Adams and Valley Counties, Idaho

By: D. L. Schmidt

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1181G

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Reconnaissance petrography of the Idaho batholith in Valley County, Idaho(1958)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### § 1212.350 Definitions.

Terms used in this subpart shall have the same meaning as in § 1206.351.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3085 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3085

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 18, 2006

                                Received

               August 4 (legislative day, August 3), 2006

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the National Trails System Act to update the feasibility and 
 suitability study originally prepared for the Trail of Tears National 
  Historic Trail and provide for the inclusion of new trail segments, 
 land components, and campgrounds associated with that trail, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REVISION OF FEASIBILITY AND SUITABILITY STUDY OF TRAIL OF 
              TEARS NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL.

    Section 5(a)(16) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 
1244(a)(16)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``subsections'' and 
        inserting ``sections''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
    ``(C) Not later than 6 months after the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall complete the remaining 
criteria and submit to Congress a study regarding the feasibility and 
suitability of designating, as additional components of the Trail of 
Tears National Historic Trail, the following routes and land components 
by which the Cherokee Nation was removed to Oklahoma:
            ``(i) The Benge and Bell routes.
            ``(ii) The land components of the designated water routes 
        in Alabama, Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Tennessee.
            ``(iii) The routes from the collection forts in Alabama, 
        Georgia, North Carolina, and Tennessee to the emigration 
        depots.
            ``(iv) The related campgrounds located along the routes and 
        land components described in clauses (i) through (iii).''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 17, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
### §7508. Guidance documents

The Administrator shall issue guidance documents under section 7408 of this title for purposes of assisting States in implementing requirements of this part respecting the lowest achievable emission rate. Such a document shall be published not later than nine months after August 7, 1977, and shall be revised at least every two years thereafter.

(July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title I, §178, as added Pub. L. 95–95, title I, §129(b), Aug. 7, 1977, 91 Stat. 750.)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert Bogan, Appellant.

Same decision as in case of *People*v. *Fiore*(16 A D 2d 875). (Appeal from judgment of Oneida Extraordinary Special and Trial Term convicting defendant of the crimes of conspiracy to obstruct justice and perjury, first degree.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3390 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain protective footwear. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 21, 2005 

Mr. RYUN of Kansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain protective 

footwear. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PROTECTIVE FOOTWEAR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 
2 

•HR 3390 IH 

‘‘ 9902.64.19 Other footwear with outer 

soles and uppers of rubber 

or plastics, incorporating a 

protective metal toe-cap, the 

foregoing designed to be 

worn over, or in lieu of, 

other footwear as a protection against water, oil, 

grease or chemicals or cold 

or inclement weather (provided for in subheading 

6402.30.50) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 10, 2020.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 1, 2020, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & First-Class Package Service Contract 179 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2021-37, CP2021-38.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2020-27078 Filed 12-9-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
§ 18.47 Voltage limitation. ( a ) A tool or switch held in the operator's hand or supported against his body will not be approved with a nameplate rating exceeding 300 volts direct current or alternating current.
( b ) A battery-powered machine shall not have a nameplate rating exceeding 240 volts, nominal (120 lead-acid cells or equivalent).
( c ) Other direct-current machines shall not have a nameplate rating exceeding 550 volts.
( d ) An alternating-current machine shall not have a nameplate rating exceeding 660 volts, except that a machine may have a nameplate rating greater than 660 volts but not exceeding 4,160 volts when the following conditions are complied with: ( 1 ) Adequate clearances and insulation for the particular voltage(s) are provided in the design and construction of the equipment, its wiring, and accessories.
( 2 ) A continuously monitored, failsafe grounding system is provided that will maintain the frame of the equipment and the frames of all accessory equipment at ground potential. Also, the equipment, including its controls and portable (trailing) cable, will be deenergized automatically upon the occurrence of an incipient ground fault. The ground-fault-tripping current shall be limited by grounding resistor(s) to that necessary for dependable relaying. The maximum ground-fault-tripping current shall not exceed 25 amperes.
( 3 ) All high voltage switch gear and control for equipment having a nameplate rating exceeding 1,000 volts are located remotely and operated by remote control at the main equipment. Potential for remote control shall not exceed 120 volts.
( 4 ) Portable (trailing) cable for equipment with nameplate ratings from 661 volts through 1,000 volts shall include grounding conductors, a ground check conductor, and grounded metallic shields around each power conductor or a grounded metallic shield over the assembly; except that on machines employing cable reels, cables without shields may be used if the insulation is rated 2,000 volts or more.
( 5 ) Portable (trailing) cable for equipment with nameplate ratings from 1,001 volts through 4,160 volts shall include grounding conductors, a ground check conductor, and grounded metallic shields around each power conductor.
( 6 ) MSHA reserves the right to require additional safeguards for high-voltage equipment, or modify the requirements to recognize improved technology.
### §1246. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Mar. 24, 1934, ch. 84, §16, 48 Stat. 464, was a saving clause, and has been transferred to a Separability note set out under section 1391 of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse.