Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 235 / Monday, December 7, 2020 / Notices 78827 

1See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from 

the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of 

Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders, 74 FR 57145 

(November 4, 2009). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 85 

FR 47185 (August 4, 2020) (Initiation Notice). 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of Expedited 

Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof 

from the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated 

concurrently with and hereby adopted by this 

notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

their own rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate applicable to the Chinese 

exporter that supplied that non-Chinese 

exporter with the subject merchandise. 

These cash deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under the APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials or conversion to 

judicial protective order is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and the term of an APO is 

a violation subject sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.213(h). 

Dated: November 30, 2020. 

Jeffrey I. Kessler, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Companies Covered by This Review 

1. Cangnan Color Make The Bag 

2. Changle Baodu Plastic Co., Ltd. 

3. First Way (H.K.) Limited 

4. Han Shing Chemical Co., Ltd. 

5. Jiangsu Hotson Plastics Co., Ltd. 

6. Ningbo Yong Feng Packaging Co., Ltd. 

7. Polywell Industrial Co. 

8. Polywell Plastic Product Factory 

9. Shandong Longxing Plastic Products 

Company Ltd. 

10. Shandong Qikai Plastics Product Co., Ltd. 

11. Shandong Qilu Plastic Fabric Group, Ltd. 

12. Shandong Shouguang Jianyuan Chun Co., 

Ltd. 

13. Shandong Youlian Co., Ltd. 

14. Wenzhou Hotson Plastics Co., Ltd. 

15. Zibo Aifudi Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. 

16. Zibo Linzi Luitong Plastic Fabric Co., Ltd. 

17. Zibo Linzi Qitianli Plastic Fabric Co., Ltd. 

18. Zibo Linzi Shuaiqiang Plastics Co., Ltd. 

19. Zibo Linzi Worun Packing Product Co., 

Ltd. 

20. Zibo Qigao Plastic Cement Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2020–26831 Filed 12–4–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–900] 

Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Final Results of the Second Expedited 

Sunset Review of the Antidumping 

Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset 

review, the Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) finds that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on diamond 

sawblades and parts thereof (diamond 

sawblades) from the People’s Republic 

of China (China) would be likely to lead 

to continuation or recurrence of 

dumping as indicated in the ‘‘Final 

Results of Sunset Review’’ section of 

this notice. 

DATES: Applicable December 7, 2020. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Christopher Williams or Minoo Hatten, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office I, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5166 or 

(202) 482–1690, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The antidumping duty order on 

diamond sawblades from China was 

published on November 4, 2009.1 In 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i) 

and (ii), Commerce received a notice of 

intent to participate in this sunset 

review from Diamond Sawblades 

Manufacturers’ Coalition (the petitioner) 

within 15 days after the date of 

publication of the Initiation Notice.2

The petitioner claimed interested party 

status under sections 771(9)(C) and (F) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act). 

Commerce received an adequate 

substantive response to the Initiation 

Notice from the domestic interested 

party within the 30-day period specified 

in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). Commerce 

received no substantive response from 

any respondent interested parties. In 

accordance with section 751(c)(3)(B) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce 

conducted an expedited, i.e., 120-day, 

sunset review of the antidumping duty 

order on diamond sawblades from 

China. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is diamond sawblades. The diamond 

sawblades subject to the order are 

currently classifiable under subheadings 

8202 to 8206 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

and may also enter under 6804.21.00. 

While the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description is 

dispositive. A full description of the 

scope of the order is contained in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum.3

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this review are 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum, including the likelihood 

of continuation or recurrence of 

dumping in the event of revocation and 

the magnitude of dumping margins 

likely to prevail if the order was 

revoked. Parties can find a complete 

discussion of all issues raised in this 

review and the corresponding 

recommendations in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum, which is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be found at 

http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/ 

index.html. The signed and electronic 

versions of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(c) 

of the Act, Commerce determines that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

order on diamond sawblades from 

China would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
78828 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 235 / Monday, December 7, 2020 / Notices 

1See Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Crepe 

Paper from the People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 

3509 (January 25, 2005) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 85 

FR 47185 (August 4, 2020) (Initiation Notice). 

3See Seaman Paper’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Crepe Paper 

from the People’s Republic of China: Notice of 

Intent to Participate in Review,’’ dated August 10, 

2020. 

4See Seaman Paper’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Crepe Paper 

from China: Substantive Response to Notice of 

Initiation of Sunset Review,’’ dated September 3, 

2020. 

5See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews 

Initiated on August 4, 2020,’’ dated September 30, 

2020. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited 

Third Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Certain Crepe Paper from the People’s 

Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

at weighted-average margins up to 

164.09 percent. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a). Timely written 

notification of the destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

Commerce is issuing and publishing 

the final results and notice in 

accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(5)(ii). 

Dated: November 30, 2020. 

Jeffrey I. Kessler, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. History of the Order 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

VII. Final Results of Second Expedited 

Sunset Review 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2020–26828 Filed 12–4–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–895] 

Certain Crepe Paper Products From 

the People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of the Expedited Third Sunset 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) finds that revocation of the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on certain 

crepe paper products from the People’s 

Republic of China (China) would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of dumping at the levels 

indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset 

Review’’ section of this notice. 

DATES: Applicable December 7, 2020. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Robert Galantucci, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2923. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On January 25, 2005, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

AD order on crepe paper products from 

China.1 On August 4, 2020, Commerce 

published the notice of initiation of the 

third sunset review of the Order, 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 On 

August 10, 2020, Commerce received a 

notice of intent to participate from 

Seaman Paper Company of 

Massachusetts, Inc. (Seaman Paper), 

within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(i).3 Seaman Paper claimed 

interested party status under section 

771(9)(C) of the Act as a producer of the 

domestic like product in the United 

States. 

On September 3, 2020, Commerce 

received an adequate substantive 

response to the Initiation Notice from 

Seaman Paper within the 30-day 

deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(3)(i).4 We received no 

substantive responses from respondent 

interested parties. On September 30, 

2020, Commerce notified the U.S. 

International Trade Commission that it 

did not receive an adequate substantive 

response from respondent interested 

parties.5 As a result, pursuant to section 

751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce 

conducted an expedited (120-day) 

sunset review of the Order. 

Scope of the Order 

For purposes of the Order, the term 

‘‘certain crepe paper’’ includes crepe 

paper products that have a basis weight 

not exceeding 29 grams per square 

meter prior to being creped and, if 

appropriate, flame-proofed. Crepe paper 

has a finely wrinkled surface texture 

and typically but not exclusively is 

treated to be flame-retardant. Crepe 

paper is typically but not exclusively 

produced as streamers in roll form and 

packaged in plastic bags. Crepe paper 

may or may not be bleached, dye 

colored, surface-colored, surface 

decorated or printed, glazed, sequined, 

embossed, die-cut, and/or flame 

retardant. Subject crepe paper may be 

rolled, flat or folded, and may be 

packaged by banding or wrapping with 

paper, by placing in plastic bags, and/ 

or by placing in boxes for distribution 

and use by the ultimate consumer. 

Packages of crepe paper subject to this 

order may consist solely of crepe paper 

of one color and/or style, or may contain 

multiple colors and/or styles. 

The merchandise subject to this order 

does not have specific classification 

numbers assigned to them under the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS). Subject 

merchandise may be entered under one 

or more of several different HTSUS 

subheadings, including: 4802.30; 

4802.54; 4802.61; 4802.62; 4802.69; 

4804.39; 4806.40; 4808.30; 4808.90; 

4811.90; 4818.90; 4823.90; 9505.90.40. 

The tariff classifications are provided 

for convenience and customs purposes; 

however, the written description of the 

scope of this order is dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this sunset review 

are addressed in the accompanying 

Issues and Decision Memorandum,6

which is hereby adopted by this notice. 

The issues discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum are (1) the 

likelihood of continuation or recurrence 

of dumping and (2) the magnitude of the 

margins likely to prevail if the Order 

were revoked. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ 

frn/. The signed and electronic versions 

of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 

752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce 

determines that revocation of the Order 

would likely lead to the continuation or 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES