alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### FRENCH v. UNITED STATES CANNING CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 15, 1905.)

Action by Albert F. French against the United States Canning Company. No opinion. Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs and disbursements. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
### §7301. General

(a) In this chapter—

(1) "service on deck" means service in the deck department in work related to the work usually performed on board vessels by able seamen and may include service on fishing, fish processing, fish tender vessels and on public vessels of the United States;

(2) 360 days is equal to one year's service; and

(3) a day is equal to 8 hours of labor or duty.

(b) The Secretary may prescribe regulations to carry out this chapter.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 541; Pub. L. 98–364, title IV, §402(9)(B), July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 448.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 7301 | 46:672(c) |

Section 7301 defines "service on deck", "one year's service" and "day" with respect to the qualifying time for the issuance of various types of endorsements as able seamen. This section also provides the Secretary with the authority to prescribe regulations to carry out this chapter.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 98–364 substituted "fishing, fish processing, fish tender vessels" for "decked fishing vessels".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Merchant Marine Post-Service Career Opportunities

Pub. L. 113–281, title III, §305(d), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 3044, provided that: "Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 18, 2014], the Commandant of the Coast Guard shall take steps to promote better awareness, on an ongoing basis, among Coast Guard personnel regarding post-service use of Coast Guard training, education, and practical experience in satisfaction of requirements for merchant mariner credentials under section 11.213 of title 46, Code of Federal Regulations."
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Jorgen P. Hansen, Also Known as Peter S. Hansen, Deceased. Mary Hansen, by Erik Krog-Meyer, as Consul General of Denmark at New York, Appellant; Tierney A. O’Rourke, as Public Administrator of Queens County, Respondent. In the Matter of the Estate of Wolfgang Hansen, Deceased. Karin M. Hansen, by Erik KrogMeyer, as Consul General of Denmark at New York, Appellant; Tierney A. O’Rourke, as Public Administrator of Queens County,

In proceedings to set aside and vacate the granting of letters of administration to the Public Administrator of Queens County upon the estates of decedents Jorgen Peter Schmidt Hansen and Wolfgang Hansen, petitioners separately appeal from two orders (one in each proceeding) of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County, both dated February 10, 1977, which denied their respective motions for summary judgment. Orders affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The motions for summary judgment rested on the ground that the court lacked jurisdiction. We find that there are triable issues of L et with *1014respect to the jurisdiction of the Surrogate’s Court. Shapiro, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
§ 1219.101 What receipts are subject to an interest charge? ( a ) Subject to the availability of appropriations, the Office of Natural Resources Revenue (ONRR) will pay the State its proportionate share of any interest charge for royalty and related monies that are placed in a suspense account pending resolution of any matters that may disallow distribution and disbursement. Such monies not disbursed by the last business day of the month following receipt by ONRR will accrue interest until paid.
( b ) Upon resolution of any matters that may disallow distribution and disbursement, ONRR will disburse the suspended monies found due in paragraph (a) of this section, plus interest, to the State, under the provisions of § 1219.100.
( c ) ONRR will apply paragraph (a) of this section to revenues that ONRR cannot disburse to the State because the payor/lessee provided to ONRR incorrect, inadequate, or incomplete information, which prevented ONRR from identifying the proper recipient of the payment.
#### § 91.236 Special case; District of Columbia.

For consolidated planning purposes, the District of Columbia must follow the requirements applicable to local jurisdictions (§§ 91.100, 91.105, and 91.200 through 91.230). In addition, it must submit the component of the State requirements dealing with the use of Low Income Housing Tax Credits (§ 91.315(j)).

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2506-0117)
#### § 92.65 Funding sanctions.

Following notice and opportunity for informal consultation, HUD may withhold, reduce or terminate the assistance where any corrective or remedial actions taken under § 92.551 fail to remedy an insular area's performance deficiencies, and the deficiencies are sufficiently substantial, in the judgment of HUD, to warrant sanctions.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-92,442-01

EX P ARTE DARREN AN THONY PA YNE, Appli cant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1461121-A IN THE 176TH DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenc ed to 25 y ear s’ imprisonment. The First Court of Appea ls aff

irmed his conviction. P ayne v. State, No. 01-16-00977- CR (Tex. App.– Houston[1s t] Aug ust 31, 2018). Applicant filed this a pplication for a

writ of habe as cor

pus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. On August 14, 2019, the t rial court en t er ed an order desig nating issues. The dist rict clerk proper ly forwa

rded this application to this Court u n d er T ex as Rule of Appellate Procedur e 73.4(b)( 5). Howeve r, the application was forwa rded befor e the trial court made finding s of fac t and

co n cl u s i ons of law. We rema nd this application to the trial court to complete its evident i ar yinvestiga tion and make f indings of f

act a nd conclusions of law

. T h e t rial court shall make findings of fac t and conclusions of l aw within ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motions, objections , proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: May

5, 2021 Do not publish
Exhibit 10.13


 


 


 


AMENDMENT TO INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR AGREEMENT


 


This amendment (“Amendment”),
dated as of the date set forth below, is to that certain Independent Director Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated
November 4, 2022 by and between [_____] (the “Director”) and NeoVolta, Inc. (the “Company”).
Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement.


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Director
have mutually agreed to modify the Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration
of the foregoing and the representations, warranties and mutual agreements herein contained, and intending to be legally bound herein,
the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.                  
Section 2 – “COMPENSATION” of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated as follows:


“COMPENSATION. The following shall
serve as compensation to the Director, for all duties, services, and positions:


Cash and Common Shares. As annual compensation,
the Company agrees to compensate Director in the amount of Sixty-Five Thousand ($65,000). Compensation shall be earned quarterly wherein
not less than 70% is paid in common shares of the Company (the “Shares”), issued in book entry form calculated based on the
share price at the end of such fiscal quarter, and up to 30% paid in cash, with such final amounts to be determined by the Director. All
Shares to be issued for each fiscal year shall be earned at the end of each fiscal quarter (provided the Director is serving as a Director
at such quarter-end), but the Director shall receive one aggregate issuance of all earned Shares on the earlier of June 30 of each year
during the term of this Agreement or upon the Director ceasing to serve as a Director of the Company for any reason.”


 


2.                  
Except as expressly set forth herein, this Amendment shall not by implication or otherwise alter, modify, amend or in any way affect
any of the terms, conditions, obligations, covenants or agreements contained in the Agreement, all of which are ratified and affirmed
in all respects and shall continue in full force and effect.


 


3.                   This
Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which together shall
be deemed to be one and the same instrument. In the event that any signature is delivered by facsimile transmission or by an e-mail which
contains a portable document format (.pdf) file of an executed signature page, such signature page shall create a valid and binding obligation
of the party executing (or on whose behalf such signature is executed) with the same force and effect as if such signature page were
an original thereof.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused
this Amendment to be duly executed by their respective authorized signatories as of the date first indicated below.


 


 


	NeoVolta, Inc.	 	[_________]
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	By: ______________________________	 	By: ______________________________
	Brent Willson	 	 
	Chief Executive Officer	 	 
	 	 	 
	Date: ________________, 2022
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive
        - Japan-United States Friendship Commission, JUSFC

#  Japan-United States Friendship Commission, JUSFC 

**Collected by:** Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive 

**Archived since:**Nov, 2012

**Description:**
Presents descriptions of programs funded by grants made by JUSFC, which is the chief instrument of the US government for training and maintaining expertise on Japan throughout American academic and professional institutions....The Commission operates its grant-making activities in four areas: Japanese studies in American higher education; Public Affairs/Education; the Study of the United States in Japanese higher education; and the Arts. Site includes applications for grants and creative artist programs.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal,     	    International Relations

**Creator:**    	    Japan-United States Friendship Commission

**Language:**    	    English

**Collector:**    	    U.S. Government Publishing Office

## Narrow Your Results

### 

            There are no further ways to narrow your results.           

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear

              - Sites
              - Search Page Text

Page 1 of 1  (6 Total Results)

**Sort By:**
                - Title (A-Z)
                - Title (Z-A)
                - URL (A-Z)
                - URL (Z-A)

### URL:     http://culcon.jusfc.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     http://www.jusfc.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://culcon.jusfc.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://twitter.com/J_USFC/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.facebook.com/JapanUSFriendshipCommission/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.jusfc.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

Page 1 of 1  (6 Total Results)

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6003
JOHN A. FREEMAN, II, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusD. A. WHITE, Officer; CAPTAIN BARKSDALE; UNKNOWN SERGEANT; UNKNOWN BOND COMPANY, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-920) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 16, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. John A. Freeman, II, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).1 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988). 2 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). 3 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) (1988). 4 Adams v. Rice , 40 F.3d 72, 74 (4th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ____, 63 U.S.L.W. 3690 (U.S. Mar. 20, 1995) (No. 94- 7733). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motions for a temporary restraining order, appointment of counsel, and an injunction in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) civil action. We dismiss the appeal as to the denial of the temporary restraining order and for the appointment of counsel because the district court's order as to those motions is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 1 and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. 2 Those parts of the order here appealed are neither final nor appealable as interlocutory or collateral. The district court's denial of an injunction is immediately appealable 3 and the finding of frivolousness is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. 4 We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Freeman v. White , No. CA-95-920 (W.D. Va. Dec. 6, 1995). Additionally, we deny Appellant's motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART
### §53725. Actions against obligor

(a) In General.—For a default under a guaranteed obligation or related agreement, the Secretary or Administrator may take any action against the obligor or another liable party that the Secretary or Administrator considers necessary to protect the interests of the United States Government. A civil action may be brought in the name of the United States or the obligee. The obligee shall make available to the Government all records and evidence necessary to prosecute the action.

(b) Title, Possession, and Purchase.—

(1) In general.—The Secretary or Administrator may—

(A) accept a conveyance of title to and possession of property from the obligor or another party liable to the Secretary or Administrator; and

(B) purchase the property for an amount not greater than the unpaid principal amount of the obligation and interest thereon.

(2) Payment of excess.—If, through the sale of property, the Secretary or Administrator receives an amount of cash greater than the unpaid principal amount of the obligation, the unpaid interest on the obligation, and the expenses of collecting those amounts, the Secretary or Administrator shall pay the excess to the obligor.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1619; Pub. L. 109–163, div. C, title XXXV, §3507(a)(1)(F), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3555; Pub. L. 110–181, div. C, title XXXV, §3522(a)(10)(B), (b), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 598.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 53725 | 46 App.:1275(e). | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title XI, §1105(e), as added June 23, 1938, ch. 600, §46, 52 Stat. 971; Aug. 15, 1953, ch. 513, §3, 67 Stat. 626; Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1265, §5, 68 Stat. 1272; Aug. 7, 1956, ch. 1026, §1(e)–(g), 70 Stat. 1087; Pub. L. 85–520, July 15, 1958, 72 Stat. 358; Pub. L. 91–469, §33, Oct. 21, 1970, 84 Stat. 1035; restated Pub. L. 92–507, §3, Oct. 19, 1972, 86 Stat. 915; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(136), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 166; Pub. L. 98–595, §1(11), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 3131. |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "may take any action" are substituted for "shall take such action . . . that, in his discretion, may be required" for clarity and to eliminate unnecessary words.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–181, §3522(b), repealed Pub. L. 109–163, §3507(a)(1)(F). See 2006 Amendment note below.

Pub. L. 110–181, §3522(a)(10)(B), incorporated the substance of the amendment by Pub. L. 109–163, §3507(a)(1)(F), into this section by inserting "or Administrator" after "Secretary" wherever appearing. See 2006 Amendment note below and section 18(a) of Pub. L. 109–304, set out as a Legislative Purpose and Construction note preceding section 101 of this title.

2006—Pub. L. 109–163, §3507(a)(1)(F), which directed the amendment of section 1275(e) of the former Appendix to this title from which this section was derived, was repealed by Pub. L. 110–181, §3522(b). See 2008 Amendment notes and Historical and Revision notes above.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 8, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 79019]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26961]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Initial Review Group; Clinical, Treatment and Health 
Services Research Review Subcommittee Clinical, Treatment and Health 
Services Research Review Subcommittee.
    Date: February 17, 2021.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Health, National Institute on 
Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 6700 B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 
20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Luis Espinoza, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Extramural Project Review Branch, National Institute on Alcohol 
Abuse and Alcoholism, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Room 2109, Bethesda, MD 
20817, (301) 443-8599, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a8cddbd8c1c6c7d2c9c4c9e8c5c9c1c486c6c1c086cfc7de"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8de8fefde4e3e2f7ece1eccde0ece4e1a3e3e4e5a3eae2fb">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical 
Research and Research Support Awards, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS)

    Dated: December 2, 2020.
Patricia B. Hansberger,
Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee 
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-26961 Filed 12-7-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 4.51
    
 
 
   1.
    
    The Borrowers desire to establish Fortune (Beijing) Qicheng Technology Co., Ltd. (the
Company) whose registered capital will be RMB1,000,000, and Borrower A and Borrower B
will respectively hold 45% and 55% of the equity interest in the Company.2.
    
    The Borrowers desire to borrow a loan (the Loan) from the Lender to invest in the
Company.3.
    
    The Lender agrees to provide the Loan to Borrowers.




---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



#####
Exhibit 99.2

                           ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

I, Janet P. O'Hara, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National Association,
the Trustee in respect of the STRATS(SM) Trust For J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
Securities, Series 2004-9 (the "Trust"), certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
          Trust, and all reports on Form 8-K filed by the Trustee in respect
          of the Trust and all distribution or servicing reports filed in
          respect of the Trust during the 2004 calendar year;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
          whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
          annual report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
          provided to the certificateholders by the Trustee under the trust
          agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in these
          reports;

     4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          Trustee, under the trust agreement and based on my knowledge, except
          as disclosed in this annual report, the Trustee has fulfilled its
          obligations under that agreement; and

     5.   The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
          Trustee's compliance with the minimum servicing or similar standards
          based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
          after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single
          Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as
          set forth in the trust agreement, that is included in these reports.

Date: March 28, 2005

By:    /s/ Janet P. O'Hara
      -----------------------
Janet P. O'Hara, Assistant Vice President
### §307. Director of the Government Publishing Office: night work

The Director of the Government Publishing Office shall cause the public printing in the Government Publishing Office to be done at night as well as through the day, when the exigencies of the public service require it.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1240; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(b), (c), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §42 (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §47, 28 Stat. 607).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–235, §1301(c), substituted "Director of the Government Publishing Office" for "Public Printer" in section catchline and text.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Government Publishing Office" substituted for "Government Printing Office" in text on authority of section 1301(b) of Pub. L. 113–235, set out as a note preceding section 301 of this title.