alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 982
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999, and at 89 FR 38293, May 7, 2024.

§ 982.307 Tenant screening. ( a ) *PHA option and owner responsibility.* ( 1 ) The PHA has no liability or responsibility to the owner or other persons for the family's behavior or suitability for tenancy. However, the PHA may opt to screen applicants for family behavior or suitability for tenancy. The PHA must conduct any such screening of applicants in accordance with policies stated in the PHA Administrative Plan.
( 2 ) The owner is responsible for screening and selection of the family to occupy the owner's unit. At or before PHA approval of the tenancy, the PHA must inform the owner that screening and selection for tenancy is the responsibility of the owner.
( 3 ) The owner is responsible for screening of families on the basis of their tenancy histories. An owner may consider a family's background with respect to such factors as: ( i ) Payment of rent and utility bills;
( ii ) Caring for a unit and premises;
( iii ) Respecting the rights of other residents to the peaceful enjoyment of their housing;
( iv ) Drug-related criminal activity or other criminal activity that is a threat to the health, safety or property of others; and
( v ) Compliance with other essential conditions of tenancy.
( b ) *PHA information about tenant.* ( 1 ) The PHA must give the owner: ( i ) The family's current and prior address (as shown in the PHA records); and
( ii ) The name and address (if known to the PHA) of the landlord at the family's current and prior address.
( 2 ) When a family wants to lease a dwelling unit, the PHA may offer the owner other information in the PHA possession, about the family, including information about the tenancy history of family members, or about drug-trafficking by family members.
( 3 ) The PHA must give the family a statement of the PHA policy on providing information to owners. The statement must be included in the information packet that is given to a family selected to participate in the program. The PHA policy must provide that the PHA will give the same types of information to all families and to all owners.
( 4 ) In cases involving a victim of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking, 24 CFR part 5, subpart L (Protection for Victims of Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, or Stalking) applies.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2577-0169) [60 FR 34695, July 3, 1995, as amended at 60 FR 45661, Sept. 1, 1995; 61 FR 27163, May 30, 1996; 64 FR 26645, May 14, 1999; 64 FR 49658, Sept. 14, 1999; 73 FR 72344, Nov. 28, 2008; 75 FR 66263, Oct. 27, 2010; 81 FR 80816, Nov. 16, 2016]
§ 92.451 Reallocation of HOME funds from a jurisdiction that is not designated a participating jurisdiction or has its designation revoked. ( a ) *Failure to be designated a participating jurisdiction.* HUD will reallocate, under this section, any HOME funds allocated to or reserved for a jurisdiction that is not a participating jurisdiction if: ( 1 ) HUD determines that the jurisdiction has failed to: ( i ) Meet the participation threshold amount in § 92.102;
( ii ) Provide notice of its intent to become a participating jurisdiction in accordance with § 92.103; or
( iii ) Submit its consolidated plan, in accordance with 24 CFR part 91; or
( 2 ) HUD after providing for amendments and resubmissions in accordance with 24 CFR part 91 disapproves the jurisdiction's consolidated plan.
( b ) *Designation revoked.* HUD will reallocate, under this section, any funds remaining in a jurisdiction's HOME Investment Trust Fund after HUD has revoked the jurisdiction's designation as a participating jurisdiction under § 92.107.
( c ) *Manner of reallocation.* HUD will reallocate funds that are subject to reallocation under this section in the following manner: ( 1 ) If the funds to be reallocated under this section are from a State, HUD will: ( i ) Make the funds available by competition in accordance with criteria in § 92.453 among applications submitted by units of general local government within the State and with preference being given to applications from units of general local government that are not participating jurisdictions, and
( ii ) Reallocate the remainder by formula in accordance with § 92.454.
( 2 ) If the funds to be reallocated are from a unit of general local government: ( i ) Located in a State that is participating jurisdiction, HUD will reallocate the funds to that State. The State, in distributing these funds, must give preference to the provision of affordable housing within the unit of general local government; or
( ii ) Located in a State that is not a participating jurisdiction, HUD will reallocate the funds by competition among units of general local government and community housing development organizations within the State, with priority going to applications for affordable housing within the unit of general local government; and reallocate the remainder by formula in accordance with § 92.454.
§ 22.8 Material required for MSHA records. In order that MSHA may know exactly what it has tested and approved, it keeps detailed records covering each investigation. These records include drawings and actual equipment as follows: ( a ) *Drawings.* The original drawings submitted with the application for the tests and the final drawings which the manufacturer must submit to MSHA before the approval is granted to show the details of the detector as approved, are retained. These drawings are used to identify the detector in the approval and as a means of checking the future commercial product of the manufacturer.
( b ) *Actual equipment.* If MSHA so desires, parts of the detectors that are used in the tests will be retained as records of the equipment submitted. If the detector is approved, MSHA will require the manufacturer to submit one of his detectors, with the approval plate attached, as a record of his commercial product.
#### § 14.1 Purpose, effective date for approval holders.

This Part establishes the flame resistance requirements for MSHA approval of conveyor belts for use in underground coal mines. Applications for approval or extensions of approval submitted after December 31, 2008, must meet the requirements of this Part.
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.1401 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED
OCTOBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FORM 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                             290
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      247
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        145
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   732
<PP&E>                                              25
<DEPRECIATION>                                       6
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,426
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,283
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,246
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,703)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,246
<SALES>                                          3,839
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,839
<CGS>                                            2,334
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,776
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 425
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (361)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (362)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    272
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (90)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
### §922. National spectrum allocation planning

The Assistant Secretary and the Chairman of the Commission shall meet, at least biannually, to conduct joint spectrum planning with respect to the following issues:

(1) the extent to which licenses for spectrum use can be issued pursuant to section 309(j) of this title to increase Federal revenues;

(2) the future spectrum requirements for public and private uses, including State and local government public safety agencies;

(3) the spectrum allocation actions necessary to accommodate those uses; and

(4) actions necessary to promote the efficient use of the spectrum, including spectrum management techniques to promote increased shared use of the spectrum that does not cause harmful interference as a means of increasing commercial access.

(Pub. L. 102–538, title I, §112, as added Pub. L. 103–66, title VI, §6001(a)(3), Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 380.)
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3467 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3467

   To amend the adjusted gross income limitation on participation in 
conservation programs administered by the Department of Agriculture to 
           exempt producers operating in the State of Hawaii.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2005

   Mr. Case introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the adjusted gross income limitation on participation in 
conservation programs administered by the Department of Agriculture to 
           exempt producers operating in the State of Hawaii.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME LIMITATION ON PARTICIPATION IN 
              CONSERVATION PROGRAMS.

    Section 1001D of the Food Security Act of 1985, as added by section 
1604 of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (Public Law 
107-171; 116 Stat. 215; 7 U.S.C. 1308-3a), is amended by adding at the 
end of subsection (b) the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) Exception.--Paragraph (1) does not apply to a payment 
        described in paragraph (2)(C) if the payment is made to an 
        individual or entity in connection with any farming, ranching, 
        or forestry operation carried out in the State of Hawaii.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Sophie L. Johnson, as Administratrix of the Estate of Lancelot M. Johnson, Deceased, Respondent, v. Chris Harris et al., Appellants.

Order, entered on February 6, 1962 granting plaintiff’s motion to open a default and vacate the judgment entered thereon unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellants, and the motion denied. The excuse offered for the plaintiff’s default on the motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute is insufficient and the default should not have been opened. In any event the plaintiff offers no proper defense to the original motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute, and opening the default on that motion would serve no useful purpose. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
### Geologic sketch of northwestern Oregon

By: P. D. Snavely Jr.H. C. WagnerR. W. Bromery

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1181MN

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (4489 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (3142 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 2**                            (184 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 3**                            (53 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<Page>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32



                                      CERTIFICATION
                PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                             TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)


    Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) (the
"Sarbanes-Oxley Act"), the undersigned officer of Liberty Satellite &
Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify,
to such officer's knowledge, that::

    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2003
(the "Form 10-Q/A") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of June 30,
2003 and December 31, 2002, and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2003 and 2002.

Dated: August 15, 2003                      /s/ Kenneth G. Carroll
                                          ------------------------------
                                          Kenneth G. Carroll
                                          President and
                                          Chief Financial Officer

    The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-Q/A or as a separate disclosure document.  A signed original of this
written statement required by section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.2










Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




The Board of Directors


James River Coal Company:




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-168628) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-126860 and 333-161123) on Form S-8 of James River Coal Company of our reports dated March 9, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of James River Coal Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows, for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, which reports appear in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of James River Coal Company.






/s/ KPMG LLP
### §1421p. Authorization of appropriations

There are hereby authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of section 1421o of this title. Sums appropriated in pursuance of sections 1421o and 1421p of this title may be allocated to such agencies of the Department as are concerned with the administration of the program in Guam.

(Pub. L. 93–421, §2, Sept. 19, 1974, 88 Stat. 1154.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Organic Act of Guam which comprises this chapter.
### §1713. Qualifications for Office of Delegate

To be eligible for the Office of Delegate a candidate must—

(a) be at least twenty-five years of age on the date of the election,

(b) have been a citizen of the United States for at least seven years prior to the date of the election,

(c) be an inhabitant of the territory from which he is elected, and

(d) not be, on the date of the election, a candidate for any other office.

(Pub. L. 92–271, §3, Apr. 10, 1972, 86 Stat. 119.)
Editorial Note on Part 5
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 5 appear at 65 FR 16715, Mar. 29, 2000.

§ 5.901 To what criminal records and searches does this subpart apply? ( a ) *General criminal records searches.* This subpart applies to criminal conviction background checks by PHAs that administer the Section 8 and public housing programs when they obtain criminal conviction records, under the authority of section 6(q) of the 1937 Act (42 U.S.C. 1437d(q)), from a law enforcement agency to prevent admission of criminals to public housing and Section 8 housing and to assist in lease enforcement and eviction.
( b ) *Sex offender registration records searches.* This subpart applies to PHAs that administer the Section 8 and public housing programs when they obtain sex offender registration information from State and local agencies, under the authority of 42 U.S.C. 13663, to prevent admission of dangerous sex offenders to federally assisted housing.
( c ) *Excluded records searches.* The provisions of this subpart do not apply to criminal conviction information or sex offender information searches by a PHA or others of information from law enforcement agencies or other sources other than as provided under this subpart.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3383 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3383

To promote commercial aviation service and economic development in the 
                       Dallas/Fort Worth region.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 2005

Mr. Hensarling introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To promote commercial aviation service and economic development in the 
                       Dallas/Fort Worth region.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``What's Love Got to Do With It Act''.

SEC. 2. SUSPENSION OF OPERATING CERTIFICATES.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, if law takes effect 
that makes Love Field in Dallas, Texas, not eligible to hold an airport 
operating certificate pursuant to part 139 of title 14, Code of Federal 
Regulations, the Des Moines International Airport located in Des 
Moines, Iowa, and the Tulsa International Airport located in Tulsa, 
Oklahoma, shall not be eligible to hold such certificates.
                                 <all>
```
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of

-- ProTek Models, LLC Under Contract No. FA8601-12-P-0461 APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA Nos. 59796, 59936

Richard G. Osborn, Esq.

OsbornLaw Ontario, CA Jeffrey P. Hildebrant, Esq.

Air Force Deputy ChiefTrial Attorney Phillip E. Reiman, Esq.

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 23 January 2017

Administ tive Judge Armed S rvices Board ofContract Appeals
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCANos. 59796, 59936, Appeals of ProTek Models, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:
JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
1.
    
    The Borrowers desire to establish Shanghai Shangtong Information Technology Co.
Ltd.(the Company) whose registered capital will be RMB1,000,000, and Borrower A and
Borrower B will respectively hold 55% and 45% of the equity interest in the Company.2.
    
    The Borrowers desire to borrow a loan (the Loan) from the Lender to invest in the
Company.3.
    
    The Lender agrees to provide the Loan to Borrowers.




---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



#####
### §542. Reservation of lien for charges; enforcement of lien; redemption

Every patent and water-right certificate issued under this subchapter shall expressly reserve to the United States a prior lien on the land patented or for which water right is certified, together with all water rights appurtenant or belonging thereto, superior to all other liens, claims, or demands whatsoever for the payment of all sums due or to become due to the United States or its successors in control of the irrigation project in connection with such lands and water rights.

Upon default of payment of any amount so due title to the land shall pass to the United States free of all encumbrance, subject to the right of the defaulting debtor or any mortgagee, lien holder, judgment debtor, or subsequent purchaser to redeem the land within one year after the notice of such default shall have been given by payment of all moneys due, with 8 per centum interest and cost. And the United States, at its option, acting through the Secretary of the Interior, may cause land to be sold at any time after such failure to redeem, and from the proceeds of the sale there shall be paid into the reclamation fund all moneys due, with interest as herein provided, and costs. The balance of the proceeds, if any, shall be the property of the defaulting debtor or his assignee: Provided, That in case of sale after failure to redeem under this section the United States shall be authorized to bid in such land at not more than the amount in default, including interest and costs.

(Aug. 9, 1912, ch. 278, §2, 37 Stat. 266.)