alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §522. Lease of water power

Whenever a development of power is necessary for the irrigation of lands, under any project undertaken under the said reclamation Act, or an opportunity is afforded for the development of power under any such project, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to lease for a period not exceeding ten years, giving preference to municipal purposes, any surplus power or power privilege, and the moneys derived from such leases shall be covered into the reclamation fund and be placed to the credit of the project from which such power is derived: Provided, That no lease shall be made of such surplus power or power privileges as will impair the efficiency of the irrigation project: Provided further, That the Secretary of the Interior is authorized, in his discretion, to make such a lease in connection with Rio Grande project in Texas and New Mexico for a longer period not exceeding fifty years, with the approval of the water-users' association or associations under any such project, organized in conformity with the rules and regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Interior in pursuance of section 498 of this title.

(Apr. 16, 1906, ch. 1631, §5, 34 Stat. 117; Feb. 24, 1911, ch. 155, 36 Stat. 930.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The said reclamation Act, referred to in text, means act June 17, 1902, ch. 1093, 32 Stat. 388, popularly known as the Reclamation Act, which is classified generally to this chapter. See section 561 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 371 of this title and Tables.
V 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3328

For the relief of Gerald Robert Christopher Haefelin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 18, 2005

Mr. SPRATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

For the relief of Gerald Robert Christopher Haefelin.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR GERALD 

4 ROBERT CHRISTOPHER HAEFELIN. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Gerald Robert Christopher Haefelin shall be eligible 

8 for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of 

9 status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent 

10 residence upon filing an application for issuance of an im11 migrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjust12 ment of status to lawful permanent resident. 
2

•HR 3328 IH 

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Gerald Robert 

2 Christopher Haefelin enters the United States before the 

3 filing deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall be con4 sidered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, 

5 if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status 

6 under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

7 as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Gerald Robert Christopher Haefelin, the Sec16 retary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce 

17 by 1, during the current or next following fiscal year, the 

18 total number of immigrant visas that are made available 

19 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

20 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if appli21 cable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 

22 available to natives of the country of the alien’s birth 

23 under section 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 
3

•HR 3328 IH 

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Gerald Robert Chris2 topher Haefelin shall not, by virtue of such relationship, 

3 be accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immi4 gration and Nationality Act.

Æ
# National Impaired Driving Prevention Month, 2020

In the United States, one person tragically dies every 50 minutes in a drunk driving incident. Far too many families experience the pain of losing a loved one to impaired driving, and even more must cope with health and financial consequences that result from this illegal and avoidable conduct. During National Impaired Driving Prevention Month, we remember the lives lost as a result of those driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol, we acknowledge the pain and suffering caused by impaired driving, we honor the brave law enforcement officers who risk their lives to protect our communities from this irresponsible behavior, and we resolve to never get behind the wheel unless we are sober.

Alcohol, drugs, and certain medications can impair judgement, decrease motor coordination, and slow reaction time to the point where operating a motor vehicle is no longer safe. While deaths caused by impaired driving have thankfully fallen by more than 30 percent in the last three decades, too many Americans still make the thoughtless decision to drive impaired, threatening other motorists, cyclists, and pedestrians, killing nearly 30 people every day.

Since my first day in office, my Administration has fought to address this tragedy head on and reduce impaired-driving deaths. We are constantly working with law enforcement officers and public safety professionals to provide them with the resources and support they need to keep our roads safe. To address the root causes of impaired driving, my Administration is also assisting those with substance use disorder through initiatives like www.FindTreatment.gov, a website dedicated to connecting people with the treatment they need, and the Rural Community Toolbox, which provides funding and resources to help build strong, healthy, and drug-free rural communities. Additionally, our Nation's business owners, skilled workers, and innovative entrepreneurs have joined in this fight. The rapid expansion and improvement of existing technologies like ride-sharing and Advanced Vehicle Technologies continue to provide additional safe alternatives to impaired driving.

We must all do our part to stop the tragedies caused by impaired driving. This month, I encourage individuals across America to recommit to working together to reduce the number of crashes, injuries, and fatalities on our Nation's roads. Let us vow to act responsibly, always drive sober, and keep our communities safe.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim December 2020 as National Impaired Driving Prevention Month. I urge all Americans to make responsible decisions and take appropriate measures to prevent impaired driving.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirtieth day of November, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-fifth.

[FR Doc. 2020-26792

Billing code 3295-F1-P
§ 578.47 New construction. ( a ) *Use.* Grant funds may be used to: ( 1 ) Pay up to 100 percent of the cost of new construction, including the building of a new structure or building an addition to an existing structure that increases the floor area by 100 percent or more, and the cost of land associated with that construction, for use as housing.
( 2 ) If grant funds are used for new construction, the applicant must demonstrate that the costs of new construction are substantially less than the costs of rehabilitation or that there is a lack of available appropriate units that could be rehabilitated at a cost less than new construction. For purposes of this cost comparison, costs of rehabilitation or new construction may include the cost of real property acquisition.
( b ) *Ineligible costs.* Grant funds may not be used for new construction on leased property.
( c ) *Broadband infrastructure.* Any new construction of a building with more than 4 rental units and funded by a grant awarded after January 19, 2017 must include installation of broadband infrastructure, as this term is defined in 24 CFR 5.100, except where the grantee determines and, in accordance with § 578.103, documents the determination that: ( 1 ) The location of the new construction makes installation of broadband infrastructure infeasible; or
( 2 ) The cost of installing broadband infrastructure would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of its program or activity or in an undue financial burden.
[77 FR 45442, July 31, 2012, as amended at 81 FR 92637, Dec. 20, 2016]
### §1425b. Issuance of notes, bonds, and obligations

The Legislature of Guam may by law authorize such authority, any provision of the Organic Act of Guam [48 U.S.C. 1421 et seq.], or any other Act of Congress to the contrary notwithstanding, to borrow money and to issue notes, bonds, and other obligations of such character and maturity, with such security, and in such manner as the legislature may provide. Such notes, bonds, and other obligations shall not be a debt of the United States, or of Guam other than such authority, nor constitute a debt, indebtedness, or the borrowing of money within the meaning of any limitation or restriction on the issuance of notes, bonds, or other obligations contained in any laws of the United States applicable to Guam or to any agency thereof.

(Pub. L. 88–171, §2, Nov. 4, 1963, 77 Stat. 304.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Organic Act of Guam, referred to in text, is act Aug. 1, 1950, ch. 512, 64 Stat. 384, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1421 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Organic Act of Guam which comprises this chapter.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6944** 

LARRY SAMUEL JONES, JR. , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. KENNETH STOLLIE, Head Sheriff; MR. HOLCOMB, Captain; MR. DEJESUS, Corporal 95

- 038; MR. BRYAN, Deputy; MR. BRANNON, Deputy; MR. INMAN, Deputy , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 2:13

- cv - 00219

- RAJ

- TEM )

Submitted : September 26, 2013 Decided: September 30, 2013

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Larry Samuel Jones, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Larry Jones, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) (2006), for failure to state a claim . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Jones’ motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Stollie , No. 2:13

- cv - 00219

- RAJ

- TEM (E.D. Va. filed May 30, 2013 & entered May 31, 2013 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED
|   | Exhibit 21.1 |
|--------|--------------|

 

 

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

 

| Entity                                       | Jurisdiction of Organization | Name Under Which Subsidiary Does Business                                                 |
|----------------------------------------------|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Alaska United Fiber System Partnership       | Alaska                       | Alaska United Fiber System Partnership, Alaska United Fiber System, Alaska United

  |
| Alaska DigiTel, LLC                          | Alaska                       | Alaska DigiTel, DigiTel                                                                   |
| GCI Communication Corp.                      | Alaska                       | GCI, GCC, GCICC, GCI Communication Corp.

                                           |
| GCI, Inc.                                    | Alaska                       | GCI, GCI, Inc.

                                                                     |
| GCI Cable, Inc.                              | Alaska                       | GCI Cable, GCI Cable, Inc.

                                                         |
| GCI Holdings, Inc.                           | Alaska                       | GCI Holdings, Inc.

                                                                 |
| Potter View Development Co., Inc.            | Alaska                       | Potter View Development Co., Inc.

                                                  |
| GCI Fiber Communication, Co., Inc.

* * | Alaska                       | GCI Fiber Communication, Co., Inc., GFCC,  Kanas

                                   |
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 00817

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 00817\00817_Checklist_110910_version34.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

00817\00817_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

00817\00817_HardcopyLog_Template.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 00817\00817_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00817\00817_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00817\00817_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

00817\Certification Statement Plant ID_00817.pdf Plant certification statement

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### Bishop *v.*Brown.

September 27, 1912.

Complaint. Before Judge Fite. Murray superior court. August 28, 1911.

*F. K. McCutchen*and *Maddox, McCamy & Shumate,*for plaintiff in error. *C. N. King*and *W. F. Mann,*contra.

Fish, C. J.

There being no bona fide effort to brief the evidence in the case, the so-called brief of evidence being largely composed of objections to evidence and the argument of counsel thereon, colloquies between counsel and between counsel and the court, and various statements of the court in ruling on the admissibility of evidence, such document will not be considered as a brief of evidence. Accordingly, this court will not review the evidence; and as no question is presented by the bill of exceptions which can be intelligently considered and passed upon without reference to the evidence, the judgment below must be affirmed. *Anderson*v. *Daniel,*137 *Ga.*635 (73 S. E. 1051); *Roberts*v. *City of Cairo,*133 *Ga.*642 (66 S. E. 938); *American Standard Jewelry Co.*v. *Goodman,*127 *Ga.*543 (56 S. E. 642).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices eoncwr.*
### §50103. Determinations of essential services

(a) Essential Services, Routes, and Lines.—

(1) In general.—The Secretary of Transportation shall investigate, determine, and keep current records of the ocean services, routes, and lines from ports in the United States, or in the territories and possessions of the United States, to foreign markets, which the Secretary determines to be essential for the promotion, development, expansion, and maintenance of the foreign commerce of the United States. In making such a determination, the Secretary shall consider and give due weight to—

(A) the cost of maintaining each line;

(B) the probability that a line cannot be maintained except at a heavy loss disproportionate to the benefit to foreign trade;

(C) the number of voyages and types of vessels that should be employed in a line;

(D) the intangible benefit of maintaining a line to the foreign commerce of the United States, the national defense, and other national requirements; and

(E) any other facts and conditions a prudent business person would consider when dealing with the person's own business.

(2) Saint lawrence seaway.—For purposes of paragraph (1), the Secretary shall establish services, routes, and lines that reflect the seasonal closing of the Saint Lawrence Seaway and provide for alternate routing of vessels through a different range of ports during that closing to maintain continuity of service on a year-round basis.

(b) Bulk Cargo Carrying Services.—The Secretary shall investigate, determine, and keep current records of the bulk cargo carrying services that should be provided by vessels of the United States (whether or not operating on particular services, routes, or lines) for the promotion, development, expansion, and maintenance of the foreign commerce of the United States and the national defense or other national requirements.

(c) Types of Vessels.—The Secretary shall investigate, determine, and keep current records of the type, size, speed, method of propulsion, and other requirements of the vessels, including express-liner or super-liner vessels, that should be employed in—

(1) the services, routes, or lines described in subsection (a), and the frequency and regularity of the voyages of the vessels, with a view to furnishing adequate, regular, certain, and permanent service; and

(2) the bulk cargo carrying services described in subsection (b).

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(b), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1557.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 50103(a)(1) | 46 App.:1121(a). | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title II, §211(a)–(c), 49 Stat. 1989; Pub. L. 91–469, §§4, 35(a), (b), Oct. 21, 1970, 84 Stat. 1018, 1035; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(67), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 159. |
| 50103(a)(2) | 46 App.:1213(a) (3d sentence related to 1121(a)). | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title VIII, §809(a) (3d sentence related to 211(a)), as added Pub. L. 97–35, title XVI, §1604, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 751. |
| 50103(b) | 46 App.:1121(b). | |
| 50103(c) | 46 App.:1121(c). | |

Section
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 00817**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 00817\00817_Checklist_110910_version34.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 00817\00817_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 00817\00817_HardcopyLog_Template.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 00817\00817_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00817\00817_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00817\00817_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 00817\Certification Statement Plant ID_00817.pdf Plant certification statement

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### SMITH, Appellant, v. HUDSON VALLEY RY. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

November 11, 1903.)

Action by Kittie F. Smith against the Hudson Valley Railway Company.

No opinion. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit 32.2 Certificate:

CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL REPORT

OF GRAY PEAKS, INC.

I, the undersigned, being the one of the co-chief executive officers, respectively, of Gray Peaks, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company), does hereby certify, to the best of his information, knowledge and belief, that (1) the Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o(d)) and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 3, 2007



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|/s/ Bary Bertiger                
|Title: Co-Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Airbee Wireless, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for
the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I Sundaresan Raja, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)
    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of the operations of the Company. /s/ Sundaresan RajaSundaresan RajaPresident & Chief Executive OfficerApril 7, 2005
 55
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-95,378-01

EX P ARTE F ELIX DELACRUZ , Applicant
ON AP P LICATION F OR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. DCR-5914-19A IN THE 154 T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM LAMB COUNTY
Per curiam . K E E L , J . filed a dissenting o p inion in which K E L L E R , P.J ., Y E A R Y , and S L A U G H T E R , J J . joined. O P I N I O N Applicant p leaded g uilty and was convicted of continuous sex ual abuse o f a c h i l d a n d sentenced to forty y ears’ imprisonment. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends that p l e a was involuntary because counsel g ave him erroneous information reg a

r ding his parole elig ibility
. Applicant contends, and counsel a dmits, that Applicant
was told that he would be elig ible for parole after serving twenty y ears, but in fact, this sentence is

w i t h o ut parole. Applicant contends that he would n ot have pleaded g uilty but for counsel’s ba d2

information. W e find that there is a reasonable probability that Applicant would h ave rejected the plea and g one to trial had he known tha t t h e s e n t e nce was without parole. Ex parte Morrow , 952 S.W
. 2d 530 (Tex
. Crim. App. 1997). Relief is g ranted. Brady v. United States , 39 7 U
. S. 742 (1970). The judg ment in cause number DC R
- 5 9 1 4

- 1 9 in the 1 54 th District Court of L amb County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sh e r i f f o f L amb County to answer the charg es as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench w a rrant w ithin ten day s from the date of this Court’s mandate. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the T e x as Dep a r t m e n t o f C r i m i n a l Ju s t ice–Correctional I nstitutions Division and the B oard of Pardons and Paroles.
Delivered: April 17, 2024 Do not publish
### §60306. Vessels not engaged in trade

A vessel is exempt from tonnage taxes and light money when not engaged in trade.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §9(b), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1678.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 60306 | 46 App.:121 (3d sentence related to trade). | Aug. 5, 1909, ch. 6, §36 (2d sentence related to trade), 36 Stat. 111; Pub. L. 101–508, title X, §10402(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–398; Pub. L. 103–66, title IX, §9001(a)(3), (c)(1), Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 402. |

Section

The words "and light money" are added for clarity and consistency. See 19 C.F.R. §4.21 (2003).