alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Harpreet S. Sangha, the Chief Executive Officer of Douglas Lake Minerals Inc. (the "Company"), and Antonia Bold-de-Haughton, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company, for the year ended May 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  September 12, 2007.

/s/ Harpreet S. Sangha

Harpreet S. Sangha
Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Antonia Bold-de-Haughton

Antonia Bold-de-Haughton 
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

__________
### §60104. Depositing certificates of documentation with consular officers

(a) Requirement of Master.—When a vessel owned by citizens of the United States, on a voyage from a port in the United States, arrives at a foreign port, the master of the vessel shall deposit the vessel's certificate of documentation with a consular officer at the foreign port if there is a consular officer at that port.

(b) Return of Certificate.—When the master produces a clearance from the appropriate officer of the foreign port, the consular officer shall return the certificate of documentation to the master if the master has complied with the provisions of law related to the discharge of seamen in a foreign country and the payment of fees of consular officers.

(c) Civil Penalty and Collection.—The master of a vessel failing to deposit the certificate of documentation as required by subsection (a) is liable to the United States Government for a civil penalty of $500. The consular officer shall bring an action to recover the penalty in any court of competent jurisdiction. The action shall be brought in the name of the consular officer for the benefit of the United States.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §9(b), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1675.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 60104 | 46 App.:354. | R.S. §4309; Apr. 5, 1906, ch. 1366, §3, 34 Stat. 100. |
| | 46 App.:355. | R.S. §4310; Apr. 5, 1906, ch. 1366, §3, 34 Stat. 100. |

Section

In this section, the words "certificate of documentation" are substituted for "register" and "papers" for consistency with chapter 121 of title 46. The words "sea-letter, and Mediterranean passport" in R.S. §4309 are omitted because the use of those documents was discontinued by Presidential proclamation on April 10, 1815. The words "consular officer" are substituted for "consul or vice consul" for consistency with 22 U.S.C. 4205. The words "commercial agent, or vice commercial agent" in R.S. §§4309 and 4310 are omitted because of the abolition of the grade of commercial agent by the Act of Apr. 5, 1906 (ch. 1366, 34 Stat. 99).

In subsection (b), the words "or commander" are omitted as unnecessary and for consistency in the section.

In subsection (c), the word "failing" is substituted for "refuses or neglects" to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "liable to the United States Government for a civil penalty" are substituted for "liable to a penalty" for clarity and for consistency in the revised title.
### §41310. Charge complaints

(a) In General.—A person may submit to the Federal Maritime Commission, and the Commission shall accept, information concerning complaints about charges assessed by a common carrier. The information submitted to the Commission shall include the bill of lading numbers and invoices, and may include any other relevant information.

(b) Investigation.—Upon receipt of a submission under subsection (a), with respect to a charge assessed by a common carrier, the Commission shall promptly investigate the charge with regard to compliance with section 41104(a) and section 41102. The common carrier shall—

(1) be provided an opportunity to submit additional information related to the charge in question; and

(2) bear the burden of establishing the reasonableness of any demurrage or detention charges pursuant to section 545.5 of title 46, Code of Federal Regulations (or successor regulations).

(c) Refund.—Upon receipt of submissions under subsection (a), if the Commission determines that a charge does not comply with section 41104(a) or 41102, the Commission shall promptly order the refund of charges paid.

(d) Penalties.—In the event of a finding that a charge does not comply with section 41104(a) or 41102 after submission under subsection (a), a civil penalty under section 41107 shall be applied to the common carrier making such charge.

(e) Considerations.—If the common carrier assessing the charge is acting in the capacity of a non-vessel-operating common carrier, the Commission shall, while conducting an investigation under subsection (b), consider—

(1) whether the non-vessel-operating common carrier is responsible for the noncompliant assessment of the charge, in whole or in part; and

(2) whether another party is ultimately responsible in whole or in part and potentially subject to action under subsections (c) and (d).

(Added Pub. L. 117–146, §10(a), June 16, 2022, 136 Stat. 1278.)
KPMG logo here


KPMG LLP
Suite 2000
355 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1568

Independent Accountants' Report

The Board of Directors
Countrywide Financial Corporation:

We have examined the accompanying management's assertion, that Countrywide
Financial Corporation and subsidiaries, including its wholly-owned subsidiary
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (CHL) and Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P.,
a wholly-owned subsidiary of CHL, (collectively, the Company) complied with
the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association
of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP)
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004.  Management is responsible
for the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards specified above and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Countrywide Financial Corporation
and subsidiaries, including its wholly-owned subsidiary Countrywide Home Loans,
Inc. (CHL) and Countrywide Home Loan Servicing, L.P., a wholly-owned subsidiary
of CHL, complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2004 is fairly stated, in all material
respects.

/s/: KPMG LLP

March 17, 2005

<page>

Countrywide Home Loans logo here

2900 Madera Road
Simi Valley, California 93065-6298
(805) 955-1000

Management's Assertion
March 17, 2005

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2004, Countrywide Financial
Corporation and Subsidiaries (which includes its wholly-owned subsidiary,
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. ("CHL"), and Countrywide Home Loans Servicing,
L.P., a wholly-owned subsidiary of CHL) (the "Company") has complied in
all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in
the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers.  As of and for this same period, the Company
had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the amount
of $200 million and $100 million, respectively.

/s/: Thomas K McLaughlin
     Thomas K McLaughlin
     Executive Managing Director and
     Chief Financial Officer

/s/: Kevin Meyers
     Kevin Meyers
     Managing Director, Chief Financial Officer
     Loan Administration
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Firearms Training Systems, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2001 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Ronavan Mohling, Chairman of the Board of
Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

| |  |                                                               
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Ronavan
Mohling                                           
|
|
|
|
| |  | Ronavan Mohling                                               
|
|
|
|
| |  | Chairman of the Board of Directors and
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
| |  | August 14, 2002
#### § 14.100 Time computation.

Time periods stated in this part shall be computed in accordance with the Department's rules with respect to computation of time which apply to the underlying proceeding.
### §57516. Operating-differential subsidies

If the Secretary of Transportation considers it necessary, the Secretary may make a contract with a charterer of a vessel owned by the Secretary for payment of an operating-differential subsidy, on the same terms and conditions, and subject to the same limitations and restrictions, as otherwise provided with respect to payment of operating-differential subsidies to operators of privately-owned vessels.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1667.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 57516 | 46 App.:1198. | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title VII, §708, 49 Stat. 2009; June 23, 1938, ch. 600, §31, 52 Stat. 962; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(110), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 163. |

Section
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
DreamWorks Animation SKG, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned
officers of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                                           
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 27, 2007 |  | /S/    JEFFREY KATZENBERG                 
|                         |  | Jeffrey Katzenberg Chief Executive Officer
|                         | 
|Dated: February 27, 2007 |  | /S/    KRISTINA M. LESLIE                 
|                         |  | Kristina M. Leslie Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R06-0AR-2007-0993; FRL - ] Approval and Promulgation ofImplementation Plans; New Mexico; Interstate Transport ofPollution

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Withdrawal ofdirect final rule.
SUMMARY: On April 8, 2010 (75 FR 17868), EPA published a direct final rule approving New Mexico State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions that addressed one element ofthe "good neighbor" provisions ofthe Clean Air Act (CAA) section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) for the 1997 ozone standards and the 1997 PM 2.5 standards. The direct final action was published without prior proposal because EPA anticipated no adverse comments. EPA stated in the direct final rule that ifEPA received adverse comments by May 10,2010, EPA would publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register. EPA subsequently received timely adverse comments on the direct final rule. Therefore, EPA is withdrawing the direct final approval. EPA will address the comments in a subsequent final action based on the parallel proposal also published on April 8,2010 (75 FR 17894). As stated in the parallel proposal, EPA will not institute a second commentperiod on this action.

DATES: The direct final rule published on April 8,2010 (75 FR 17868), is withdrawn as of2 [Insert date ofpublication in the Federal Register].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:. Emad Shahin, Air Planning Section (6PDL), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, telephone 214-665-6717; fax number 214-665-7263; e-mail address shahin. emad@epa.gov.

List of Subjects in 40 CFRPart 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. 

# DateddM

# IID, Al Armendariz, Regional Administra 

# ,

Accordingly, the amendments to 40 CFR 52.1620 published in the Federal Register on April 8, 2010 (75 FR 17868), which were to become effective on June 7, 2010, are withdrawn.
Exhibit 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF CELLU TISSUE HOLDINGS, INC.



|                                          |  |                                   
|----------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                        |  | State ofIncorporation/Organization
|Cellu Tissue CorporationNatural Dam      |  | Delaware                          
|Cellu Tissue CorporationNeenah           |  | Delaware                          
|Cellu Tissue LLC                          |  | Delaware                          
|Coastal Paper Company                     |  | Virginia                          
|Interlake Acquisition Corporation Limited |  | Nova Scotia, Canada               
|Menominee Acquisition Corporation         |  | Delaware                          
|Van Paper Company                         |  | Mississippi                       
|Van Timber Company                        |  | Mississippi                       
|Cellu TissueCityForest LLC               |  | Minnesota                         
|Cellu TissueThomaston, LLC               |  | Delaware                          
|Cellu TissueLong Island, LLC             |  | Delaware                          
|Cellu Tissue CorporationOklahoma City    |  | Delaware
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsIntegration of altitude and airspeed information into a primary flight display via moving-tape formats: Evaluation during random tracking taskA ground-based aircraft simulation study was conducted to determine the effects on pilot preference and performance of integrating airspeed and altitude information into an advanced electronic primary flight display via moving-tape (linear moving scale) formats. Several key issues relating to the implementation of moving-tape formats were examined in this study: tape centering, tape orientation, and trend information. The factor of centering refers to whether the tape was centered about the actual airspeed or altitude or about some other defined reference value. Tape orientation refers to whether the represented values are arranged in descending or ascending order. Two pilots participated in this study, with each performing 32 runs along seemingly random, previously unknown flight profiles. The data taken, analyzed, and presented consisted of path performance parameters, pilot-control inputs, and electrical brain response measurements.Document ID19870018232Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsAbbott, Terence S.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Nataupsky, Mark*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Steinmetz, George G.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1987Subject CategoryAircraft InstrumentationReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:4010L-16309NASA-TM-4010Accession Number87N27665Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-67-41-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19870018232.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARYLYN BEAVER,

Plaintiff,

 v.

BANK OF THE WEST WELFARE

BENEFITS PLAN, and BANCWEST

CORPORATION WELFARE BENEFIT

PLAN, 

Defendants. /

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Real Party in Interest. /

No. C 09-02177 WHA

ORDER RE NOTICE

OF SETTLEMENT

The Court is in receipt of the parties’ notice of settlement and cautions the parties that

until a dismissal is filed in this case, all deadlines are in effect. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 16, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-02177-WHA Document 62 Filed 07/16/10 Page 1 of 1
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JAIRUS PRINCE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-2946

[March 10, 2022]

Appeal of order denying 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the 

Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Lawrence M. Mirman, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 562005CF000340.

Jairus Prince, Malone, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Editorial Note on Part 5
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 5 appear at 65 FR 16715, Mar. 29, 2000.

§ 5.510 Documents of eligible immigration status. ( a ) *General.* A responsible entity shall request and review original documents of eligible immigration status. The responsible entity shall retain photocopies of the documents for its own records and return the original documents to the family.
( b ) *Acceptable evidence of eligible immigration status.* Acceptable evidence of eligible immigration status shall be the original of a document designated by INS as acceptable evidence of immigration status in one of the six categories mentioned in § 5.506(a) for the specific immigration status claimed by the individual.
[61 FR 13616, Mar. 27, 1996, as amended at 61 FR 60539, Nov. 29, 1996; 64 FR 25731, May 12, 1999]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6628
JOHN PATTON MCGLOTHLIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SERGEANT RICHIE; OFFICER MARSHALL; OFFICER BLANTON; OFFICER LEUSEUR; LARRY HUFFMAN; LISA EDWARDS; JOHN DOES; JANE DOES, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-1290-R) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 6, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Patton McGlothlin, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Lance Bradford Leggitt, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McGlothlin v. Richie , No. CA-95-1290-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 12, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Editorial Note on Part 984
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 984 appear at 65 FR 16731, Mar. 29, 2000.

§ 984.304 Amount of rent paid by FSS family and increases in family income. ( a ) *Amount of rent paid by FSS family.* The amount of rent paid by an FSS family is determined in accordance with the requirements of the applicable housing assistance program as specified in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section. ( 1 ) *Public housing program: Calculation of total tenant payment.* Total tenant payment for an FSS family participating in the FSS program is determined in accordance with the regulations set forth in 24 CFR part 5, subpart F.
( 2 ) *Section 8 programs: Calculation of rent.* ( i ) For the HCV program, rent is determined in accordance with 24 CFR part 982, subpart K; and
( ii ) For the PBV program, rent is determined in accordance with 24 CFR part 983, subpart G.
( b ) *Increases in FSS family income.* Any increase in the earned income of an FSS family during its participation in an FSS program may not be considered as income or an asset for purposes of eligibility of the FSS family under any other program administered by HUD.
§ 92.450 General. ( a ) This subpart J sets out the conditions under which HUD reallocates HOME funds that have been allocated, reserved, or placed in a HOME Investment Trust Fund.
( b ) A jurisdiction that is not a participating jurisdiction but is meeting the requirements of §§ 92.102, 92.103, and 92.104, (participation threshold, notice of intent, and submission of consolidated plan) is treated as a participating jurisdiction for purposes of receiving a reallocation under subpart J of this part.