alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## SUBTITLE VII—AVIATION PROGRAMS

#### PART A—AIR COMMERCE AND SAFETY

#### subpart i—general

Chapter
Sec.
401.
General Provisions
40101

#### subpart ii—economic regulation

411.
Air Carrier Certificates
41101
413.
Foreign Air Transportation
41301
415.
Pricing
41501
417.
Operations of Carriers
41701
419.
Transportation of Mail
41901
421.
Labor-Management Provisions
42101
423.
Passenger Air Service Improvements
42301

#### subpart iii—safety

441.
Registration and Recordation of Aircraft
44101
443.
Insurance
44301
445.
Facilities, Personnel, and Research
44501
447.
Safety Regulation
44701
448.
Unmanned Aircraft Systems
44801
449.
Security
44901
451.
Alcohol and Controlled Substances Testing
45101
453.
Fees
45301

#### subpart iv—enforcement and penalties

461.
Investigations and Proceedings
46101
463.
Penalties
46301
465.
Special Aircraft Jurisdiction of the United States
46501

#### PART B—AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT AND NOISE

471.
Airport Development
47101
473.
International Airport Facilities
47301
475.
Noise
47501

#### PART C—FINANCING

481.
Airport and Airway Trust Fund Authorizations
48101
482.
Advance Appropriations for Airport and Airway Trust Facilities
48201
[483.
Repealed.]

#### PART D—PUBLIC AIRPORTS

491.
METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON AIRPORTS
49101

#### PART E—MISCELLANEOUS

501.
Buy-American Preferences
50101

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2024**—Pub. L. 118–63, title XI, §1101(c), May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1413, substituted "Unmanned Aircraft Systems" for "Unmanned aircraft systems" in item for chapter 448.

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–254, div. K, title I, §1991(i)(2), Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3645, which directed amendment of this analysis by striking item for chapter 483 "Aviation security funding", was executed by striking item for chapter 483 "Aviation Security Funding" to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title III, §341(b)(1), Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3287, added item for chapter 448.

**2012**—Pub. L. 112–95, title IV, §415(d), Feb. 14, 2012, 126 Stat. 96, added item for chapter 423.

**2001**—Pub. L. 107–71, title I, §118(c)(2), Nov. 19, 2001, 115 Stat. 628, added item for chapter 483.

**1997**—Pub. L. 105–102, §2(20), Nov. 20, 1997, 111 Stat. 2205, substituted "PUBLIC AIRPORTS" for "RESERVED" in item for part D and added item for chapter 491.

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–287, §5(64), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3395, substituted "RESERVED" for "MISCELLANEOUS" in item for part D, struck out item for chapter 491 "Buy-American Preferences", and added items for part E and chapter 501.

Pub. L. 104–264, title II, §277(b), Oct. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 3248, added item for chapter 482.
§ 1227.10 What is the authority for information collection? ( a ) The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved the information collection requirements contained in this part under 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* The approved OMB control number is identified in 30 CFR 1210.10. We will use the information collected to review and approve delegation proposals from States wishing to perform royalty management functions.
( b ) The Federal Government will reimburse some costs, as provided by statute, for delegated functions that each state performs. However, states could incur additional start-up costs, such as purchasing equipment necessary to perform a delegated function that may not be reimbursable. The ONRR estimates that each payor or reporter will coordinate their interactions and communications among the several states and with ONRR. Send comments regarding the burden estimates or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing burden, to the Office of Natural Resources Revenue, Attention: Rules & Regs Team, OMB Control Number 1012-0003, P.O. Box 25165, Denver, CO 80225-0165.
[62 FR 43084, Aug. 12, 1997, as amended at 75 FR 61087, Oct. 4, 2010; 76 FR 76616, Dec. 8, 2011]
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 0 A0 73 7 . SPRATT HOW ARD v . THE STATE.

In 1 9 9 6

, Sp rat t Ho ward was co n v i ct ed o f arm ed ro b b e r y, a n d h is co n v i ct i o n

was affi rm ed o n ap p eal

. See Ho wa r d v

. S t a t e , 23 3 Ga. Ap p

. 7 2 4 (5 0 5 SE2 d 7 6 8 )
(1 9 9 8). Ho ward s u b s eq u en tl y fi l ed m u l t i pl e p ro s e m ot i o n s at tack i n g t h e v al i d i t y o f

h i s co n vi ct i o n , hi s s en t en ce, t h e fai rn es s o f h i s t reat m en t

, an d th e i n teg ri t y o f t h e ju d g e. Th e t ri al co u rt den i ed t h e m ot i on s b y o rd er e n t e r e d S e p t em b er 9

, 2 0 1 9

, an d

Ho ward fi l ed a n o t i ce o f ap p eal o n Oct o b er 1 4 , 2 0 1 9 . W e l ack ju ri sd i ct i o n

. A n o t i ce o f ap peal m

u s t b e fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0 d ay s o f en t ry of t h e o rd er s o u g h t to

b e ap peal ed . OCGA § 5 -6 -3 8 (a). Th e p ro p er an d t i m el y fi li n g o f a n o t i ce o f ap p eal

i s an ab s o l u t e req ui rem en t t o co n fer j u ri s d i ct i o n o n t h i s Co u rt

. Ro wl a n d v. S t a t e , 2 6 4

Ga. 8 7 2

, 8 7 2 (1 ) (4 5 2 SE2 d 75 6 ) (1 9 9 5 ). Ho ward ’ s n o t i ce o f ap p eal

, wh i ch w as fi l ed

3 5 d ay s aft er en t ry o f t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er, i s u n t i m el y

. W e th u s l ack ju ri s di ct i o n to

co n si d er t h i s ap peal , wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. December 09, 2019

12/09/2019
124°22'50"
2'50

43°22" Zr

124°4.

5
_ 43°22'30"

zg (048 9] 7P4D
COLD

Q00°hesy

45°15" a |
eD7I5O! . ~ J) 43°15)
ae 124°15"

SYMBOLOGY a a

+ LiGHT

% ROCK
@ REF OR LEDGE

i} LOW WATER, .
INDEFINITE CHARLESTON, OREG,

sco CHARLESTON , OREG.
erapients . HEF

Meters Feet
°

[| BATHYMETRIC CONTOUR INTERVAL 2 METERS
scam WITH SUPPLEMENTARY 1 METER CONTOURS Aw
ATUM 1S MEAN LOWER OW WATER

HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY \NDEX

)
vst
### §4106. Penalties

If a vessel to which this chapter applies is operated in violation of this chapter or a regulation prescribed under this chapter, the owner, charterer, managing operator, agent, master, and individual in charge are each liable to the United States Government for a civil penalty of not more than $5,000. The vessel also is liable in rem for the penalty.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 529; Pub. L. 100–540, §3, Oct. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 2719.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 4106 | 46:526o |

Section 4106 provides a civil penalty of $100 for a violation of this chapter or a regulation under this chapter. The vessel also is liable in rem.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–540 substituted "not more than $5,000" for "$100".
### §1323b. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–845, §26(b), Oct. 18, 1962, 76A Stat. 701

Section, act June 13, 1940, ch. 358, §2, 54 Stat. 389, related to postal-savings deposits.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 23, 2009

d0615 

# Order

June 23, 2009

137427(20)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137427 COA: 285856 Wayne CC: 05-018392 MATTHEW L. STREATER, 05-018394 Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e motion for reconsideration of this Court’s February 24, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
§ 246.6 Initiation. When a mortgagor determines that the permitted increase in rents as prescribed by the board will not provide a rent level necessary to maintain and operate adequately the project, and the mortgagor elects to request preemption under this subpart, it shall: ( a ) File an application for whatever relief or redetermination is permitted under the State or local law and;
( b ) Notify: ( 1 ) The tenants in accordance with § 246.7 of this subpart,
( 2 ) the appropriate HUD office pursuant to § 246.8, and
( 3 ) the board of the mortgagor's intention to file a request for preemption of local rent control regulation pursuant to the provisions of regulations in this subpart. This action may be taken if either the board's written decision is unacceptable to the mortgagor or no written decision is received from the board within 30 days of the mortgagor's request under paragraph (a) of this section.
#### § 1202.556 How do I determine the value of avoidably lost, wasted, or drained gas?

If BLM determines that a volume of gas was avoidably lost or wasted, or a volume of gas was drained from your Indian lease for which compensatory royalty is due, then you must determine the value of that volume of gas under 30 CFR part 1206.
### §55304. Exports financed by the United States Government

It is the sense of Congress that any loans made by an instrumentality of the United States Government to foster the exporting of agricultural or other products shall provide that the products may be transported only on vessels of the United States unless, as to any or all of those products, the Secretary of Transportation, after investigation, certifies to the instrumentality that vessels of the United States are not available in sufficient number, in sufficient tonnage capacity, on necessary schedules, or at reasonable rates.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1642.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 55304 | 46 App.:1241–1. | Mar. 26, 1934, ch. 90, 48 Stat. 500; June 29, 1936, ch. 858, §204, 49 Stat. 1987; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(127), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 165. |

Section

This section codifies the Joint Resolution of March 26, 1934 (ch. 90, 48 Stat. 500) (also commonly known as Public Resolution 17). The codification of this provision is not intended to change its status as a "Sense of Congress" provision in any way. The words "Reconstruction Finance Corporation or" are omitted as obsolete because the Reconstruction Finance Corporation was abolished by section 6 of Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 1957 (5 App. U.S.C.).
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.118 Will BSEE approve gas injection? The Regional Supervisor may authorize you to inject gas on the OCS, on and off-lease, to promote conservation of natural resources and to prevent waste. ( a ) To receive BSEE approval for injection, you must: ( 1 ) Show that the injection will not result in undue interference with operations under existing leases; and
( 2 ) Submit a written application to the Regional Supervisor for injection of gas.
( b ) The Regional Supervisor will approve gas injection applications that: ( 1 ) Enhance recovery;
( 2 ) Prevent flaring of casinghead gas; or
( 3 ) Implement other conservation measures approved by the Regional Supervisor.
### §2151. Analysis of pensions

#### (a) Determination

If the Oversight Board determines, in its sole discretion, that a pension system of the territorial government is materially underfunded, the Oversight Board shall conduct an analysis prepared by an independent actuary of such pension system to assist the Oversight Board in evaluating the fiscal and economic impact of the pension cash flows.

#### (b) Provisions of analysis

An analysis conducted under subsection (a) shall include—

(1) an actuarial study of the pension liabilities and funding strategy that includes a forward looking projection of payments of at least 30 years of benefit payments and funding strategy to cover such payments;

(2) sources of funding to cover such payments;

(3) a review of the existing benefits and their sustainability; and

(4) a review of the system's legal structure and operational arrangements, and any other studies of the pension system the Oversight Board shall deem necessary.

#### (c) Supplementary information

In any case, the analysis conducted under subsection (a) shall include information regarding the fair market value and liabilities using an appropriate discount rate as determined by the Oversight Board.

(Pub. L. 114–187, title II, §211, June 30, 2016, 130 Stat. 576.)
### §§132, 134. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 8, 1966, 80 Stat. 640

Section 132, act May 7, 1906, ch. 2083, §2, 34 Stat. 170, prescribed term of office of Delegate to Congress.

Section 134, act May 7, 1906, ch. 2083, §2, 34 Stat. 170, specified salary and allowances of Delegate.
Exhibit 21.1





OHA INVESTMENT CORPORATION





SUBSIDIARIES








|   |                                                       
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------
|1. | OHA Funding GP, LLC, a Texas limited liability company

|   |                                                    
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------
|2. | OHA Nevada, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company

|   |                                             
|-- | --------------------------------------------
|3. | OHA Funding, LP, a Texas limited partnership

|   |                                                              
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|4. | OHA Asset Holdings GP, LLC, a Texas limited liability company

|   |                                                       
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------
|5. | OHA Asset Holdings II, LP, a Texas limited partnership

|   |                                                               
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------
|6. | OHA/OCI Investments, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

|   |                                                                          
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|7. | OHA Investment Corporation Sub, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
### SUBCHAPTER II—TERMINALS
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER OF TRAMMELL CROW COMPANYPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

In connection withthe accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Derek R. McClain, Chief Financial Officer of Trammell CrowCompany (the “Company”), hereby certify that:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   | /s/ Derek R.  McClain   |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Name: Derek R. McClain  |
|   | Date: May 10, 2004 |
|   |                    |

 

----
Exhibit 15.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 We have issued our report dated April 29, 2013, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule in the Annual Report of China Finance Online Co. Limited, its subsidiaries, its variable interest entities ("VIEs") and its VIEs' subsidiaries on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of China Finance Online Co. Limited, its subsidiaries, its variable interest entities ("VIEs") and its VIEs' subsidiaries on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-157670, No.333-139192, and No 333-123802) and Form S-8/A (File No. 333-139192).
 
 
 
 /s/Grant Thornton
 Beijing, People’s Republic of China
 April 29, 2013
#### § 103.335 Review of compliance with conciliation agreements.

HUD may, from time to time, review compliance with the terms of any conciliation agreement. Whenever HUD has reasonable cause to believe that a respondent has breached a conciliation agreement, the Assistant Secretary shall refer the matter to the Attorney General with a recommendation for the filing of a civil action under section 814(b)(2) of the Fair Housing Act for the enforcement of the terms of the conciliation agreement.

[54 FR 3292, Jan. 23, 1989, as amended at 59 FR 39956, Aug. 5, 1994]
#### McKEON, Respondent, v. MULLIGAN et al.. Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 13, 1903.)

Action by John McKeon against Thomas Mulligan and Michael Tiernan.

No opinion. Order affirmed, on argument, with $10 costs and disbursements.
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Home City Financial Corporation, (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, J.
William Stapleton, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating
Officer, and Charles A. Mihal, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ J. William Stapleton                /s/ Charles A. Mihal
----------------------------------      -------------------------------------
J. William Stapleton                    Charles A. Mihal
President, Chief Executive Officer      Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
and Chief Operating Officer



Date:     May  13, 2004                 Date:     May 13, 2004
      ---------------------                   ---------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Home City Financial Corporation and will be retained by Home City
Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


                                       25
### §12135. Invalidation of certificates of documentation

A certificate of documentation or an endorsement on the certificate is invalid if the vessel for which it is issued—

(1) no longer meets the requirements of this chapter and regulations prescribed under this chapter applicable to the certificate or endorsement; or

(2) is placed under the command of an individual not a citizen of the United States in violation of section 12131 of this title.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §5, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1506.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 12135 | 46:12111(a). | |

Section

In paragraph (2), the words "except for a recreational endorsement" are omitted as unnecessary because a recreational endorsement does not permit a vessel to engage in a trade.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 329 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 329

 To require the Secretary of the Treasury to redesign the face of $10 
 Federal reserve notes so as to include a likeness of President Ronald 
                 Wilson Reagan, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 2005

 Mr. Hayworth introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of the Treasury to redesign the face of $10 
 Federal reserve notes so as to include a likeness of President Ronald 
                 Wilson Reagan, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``President Ronald Reagan $10 Bill 
Act''.

SEC. 2. LIKENESS OF PRESIDENT REAGAN REQUIRED TO BE INCLUDED ON THE 
              FACE OF $10 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES.

    The 8th undesignated paragraph of section 16 of the Federal Reserve 
Act (12 U.S.C. 418) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
sentence: ``The face of $10 Federal reserve notes printed after 
December 31, 2005, shall bear the likeness of President Ronald Wilson 
Reagan''.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 28, 2016

No. 04

- 15

- 00729

- CV

CITY OF RIO GRANDE CITY, TEXAS , and Joel Villarreal, Herman R. Garza III, Arcadio J.

Salinas III, Rey Ramirez, and Dave Jones in their Official Capacities

, Appellants

v.

BFI WASTE SERVICES OF TEXAS, LP d/b/a Allied Waste Services of Rio Grande Valley, Appellees

From the 2 29th Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC

- 15

- 604

Honorable Migdalia Lopez, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On June 27, 2016, Appellants filed an amended motion to strike Appellee’s supplemental brief. Appellants further requested an additional 9,629 words with which to respond and an extension of time in which to file their reply brief . Appellants’ amended motion to strike and request for an additional 9,629 words with which to respond are DENIED. Appellants ’ request
for an extension of time in which to file their reply brief is GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED Appellant’s reply brief is due July 11, 2016.

______________________________ ___ Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 28th day of June, 2016

.

_________________________________ __ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### City of Chicago, appellee, v. M. H. Callner, appellant.

Gen. No. 28,687.

Suit against City of Chicago. Judgment for city. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. W. E. Helander, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district.

Affirmed for failure of appellant to file record.

See City v. Salmitsky, 210 Ill. App. 159.

Opinion filed June 25, 1923.

No appearance for appellant. No appearance for appellee.

Per Curiam.
§ 1229.126 Appeals. ( a ) Appeals made pursuant to the rules and procedures at 30 CFR parts 1243 and 1290 related to demand letters issued by officers of the ONRR for additional royalties identified under a delegation of authority shall be filed with the ONRR for processing. The State regulatory authority shall, upon the request of the ONRR, provide competent and knowledgeable staff for testimony, as well as any required documentation and analyses, in support of the lessor's position during the appeal process.
( b ) An affected State, upon the request of the ONRR, shall provide expert witnesses from their audit staff for testimony as well as required documentation and analyses to support the Department's position during the litigation of court cases arising from denied appeals. The cost of providing expert witnesses including travel and per diem is reimbursable under the provisions of a delegation of authority, at the Federal Government's existing per diem rates.