alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-. .



# The Attorney General of Texas
June 29, 1978 JOHNL.HILL Attorney General
Mrs. Margaret L. Rowland, R.N. Executive Secretary Board ofNurse Examiners for the State ofTexas 7600 Chevy Chase Drive, Suite 502 Austin, Texas 78752 Dear Ms.Rowland: Opinion No. H- 1199 Re: Whether the Board of Nurse Examiners may probate a revocation or suspension of a nurse’s license.

You have requested our opinion regarding whether the Board of Nurse Examiners may probate arevocation or suspension ofa nurse’s license. Article 4525, V.T.C.S., which describes the procedure by which the Board shall conduct disciplinary proceedings, authorizes the Board to

refuse to admit persons to its examinations, or . . . refuse to issue a license or certificate of registration or to issue a certificate of re-registration, or . . . suspend for any period up to a year, or . .. revoke the license or certificate of registration or certificate of re-registration of any practitioner of professional nursing.

. . . Although the statute permits the Board to “issue a warning or reprimand” after a “preliminary investigation,” any disciplinary action taken against a licensed nurse, which action results from a hearing, is clearly limited to revocation or suspension of the nurse’s license. It is well established that an administrative agency may exercise only those powers which are expressly granted to it by statute, together with those neces&ily implied therefrom. Stauffer v. Cit; of San~Antonio, 344 S.W.2d 158.160(Tex. 1961). Aswe said in Attornev General Ooinion H-928 (1977).the rules of an administrative agency may iot enlarge-upon the s&e o? the statute from which it derives its authority. Opinions H-870 (1976);H-842 (1976);H-669 (1975).See also Attorney General

p. 4818., -

Mrs. Margaret L..Rowland, R.N. - Page 2’ (H-1199)
Furthermore, a number ofother boards are ~gpecifi+%llyempowered to probate an order revoking or suspending a practitioner’s license. See V.T.C.S. art. 4512c, S 23 (Board of Examiners of Psychologists); V.T.C.S. art.4506 (Board of Medical Examiners); V.T.C.S. art. 4512b, S 14(Board of Chiropractic Examiners). In our opinion, the absence of any such express authority from article 4525 indicates a legislative intent that probation is not an alternative which is currently available to the Board of Nurse Examiners. Accordingly, it is our view that, under present law, the Board of Nurse Examiners may not probate a revocation or suspension of a nurse’s license. SUMMARY,: ~.

Under present law, the Board of Nurse Examiners may not probate arevocation or suspension ofa nurse’s license.

Attornev General of’Texas APPROVED:

C. ROBERT HEATH, Chairman Opinion Committee ” jsn

:

P. 4819
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 200.857 [Reserved]
### §50303. Operating property and extending term of notes

(a) General Authority.—The Secretary of Transportation may—

(1) operate or lease docks, wharves, piers, vessels, or real property under the Secretary's control, except that the prior consent of the Secretary of Defense for such use shall be required with respect to any vessel in the Ready Reserve Force or in the National Defense Reserve Fleet which is maintained in a retention status for the Department of Defense; and

(2) make extensions and accept renewals of—

(A) promissory notes and other evidences of indebtedness on property; and

(B) mortgages and other contracts securing the property.

(b) Terms of Transactions.—A transaction under subsection (a) shall be on terms the Secretary considers necessary to carry out the purposes of this subtitle, but consistent with sound business practice.

(c) Availability of Amounts.—Amounts received by the Secretary from a transaction under this section are available for expenditure by the Secretary as provided in this subtitle.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(b), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1564; Pub. L. 110–181, div. C, title XXXV, §3512, Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 594.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 50303 | 46 App.:1112. | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title II, §202, 49 Stat. 1986; Aug. 26, 1937, ch. 822, §1, 50 Stat. 839; June 23, 1938, ch. 600, §1, 52 Stat. 953; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(60), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 158. |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "Notwithstanding any other provision of law" are omitted as unnecessary. In paragraph (1), the word "lands" is omitted as included in "real property". In paragraph (2)(A), the word "promissory" is added for clarity. The words "hereby transferred", referring to the transfer under the first sentence of section 202 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936 (repealed by section 12(60)(A) of Public Law 97–31), are omitted as obsolete.

Subsection (b) is substituted for "in accordance with good business methods and on such terms and conditions as he determines to effectuate the policy of this chapter" and "upon such terms and conditions as he may prescribe in accordance with sound business practice" for consistency and to eliminate unnecessary words.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2008—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 110–181 inserted "vessels," after "piers," and substituted "control, except that the prior consent of the Secretary of Defense for such use shall be required with respect to any vessel in the Ready Reserve Force or in the National Defense Reserve Fleet which is maintained in a retention status for the Department of Defense;" for "control;".
### §30706. Defenses

(a) Due Diligence.—If a carrier has exercised due diligence to make the vessel in all respects seaworthy and to properly man, equip, and supply the vessel, the carrier and the vessel are not liable for loss or damage arising from an error in the navigation or management of the vessel.

(b) Other Defenses.—A carrier and the vessel are not liable for loss or damage arising from—

(1) dangers of the sea or other navigable waters;

(2) acts of God;

(3) public enemies;

(4) seizure under legal process;

(5) inherent defect, quality, or vice of the goods;

(6) insufficiency of package;

(7) act or omission of the shipper or owner of the goods or their agent; or

(8) saving or attempting to save life or property at sea, including a deviation in rendering such a service.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §6(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1517.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30706 | 46 App.:192. | Feb. 13, 1893, ch. 105, §3, 27 Stat. 445. |

Section

This section is restated as two subsections to clarify that the exercise of due diligence in making the vessel seaworthy is a condition only to the defense of error in navigation or management restated in subsection (a). See May v. Hamburg-Amerikanische Packetfahrt Aktiengesellschaft (The Isis), 290 U.S. 333, 353 (1933). The words "transporting merchandise or property to or from any port in the United States of America" are omitted because of section 30702(a) of the revised title.
Skip Links

USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Geologic Investigations Series I-2634

Pubs Warehouse

## Geologic Map of the Sedan Quadangle, Gallatin and Park Counties, Montana

#### By Betty Skipp, D.R. Lageson, and W.J. McMannis

| *I-2634*Map PDF (3.3 MB)                Right-Click to 'Download' or 'Save As'*I-2634*Map PDF (3.3 MB)              Right-Click to 'Download' or 'Save As'**Abstract**
This quadrangle lies 6.4 km (4 mi) northeast of Bozeman, Montana, in southwestern Montana. Metamorphic, sedimentary, and volcanic rocks of Precambrian to Tertiary age are exposed in the Bridger Range and southwestern margin of the Crazy Mountains Basin in a crustal cross section and a structural triangle zone. Surface geology records Precambrian extension, Late Paleocene east-vergent contraction, including backthrusts, and Holocene basin-range extension. | Version 2.1

Posted August 2007
-  **Map** PDF (3.3 MB) 
This text-only version of the map is accessible as defined by Section 508.
-  **Downloads** Directory  Refer to the README and Metadata files for detailed information about this dataset. 

**For sale by**        U.S. Geological Survey Information Services,        Box 25286, Federal Center,        Denver, CO 80225;        1-888-ASK-USGSUSGS Store |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**Suggested citation:**

Skipp, B., Lageson, D.R., and McMannis, W.J., 1999, Geologic map of the Sedan quadrangle, Gallatin and Park Counties, Montana: U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Investigations Series I-2634, 1 plate, scale 1:48,000.

----

Download the latest version of Acrobat Reader, free of charge
access.adobe.com

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey	URL: *http://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/imap/i-2634/index.html*	Questions or Assistance: Contact USGS	Last modified: Wednesday, 30-Nov-2016 17:39:40 EST
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATIONS

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections
(A) and (B) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code), I, Andrew Borene, Principal Executive Officer of Cipherloc Corporation, a Texas corporation (the “Company”),
hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:



The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2019 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the Form
10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:
    February 14, 2020 | By:    | /s/
    Andrew Borene      
|--------------------------- | ------ | ---------------------------
|                            | Name:  | Andrew
    Borene          
|                            | Title: | Chief
    Executive Officer
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3415 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixture of magnesium peroxide and 

magnesium oxide containing 35 percent magnesium peroxide. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2005 

Mr. BAIRD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixture of magnesium 

peroxide and magnesium oxide containing 35 percent 

magnesium peroxide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIXTURE OF MAGNESIUM PEROXIDE AND MAG4 NESIUM OXIDE CONTAINING 35 PERCENT 

5 MAGNESIUM PEROXIDE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new subheading: 
2 

•HR 3415 IH 

‘‘ 9902.28.02 Mixture of magnesium peroxide and magnesium oxide 

containing 35 percent magnesium peroxide (CAS No. 

1335–26–8) (provided for in 

subheading 2816.10.00) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply with respects to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
NO. 07-06-0298-CV IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL B OCTOBER 25, 2006

______________________________ PARADISE VILLAGE, INC., APPEL LANT

V. FINOVA CAPITAL CORPORATION, APPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE 341 ST DISTRIC T COURT O F W EBB COUNT Y; NO. 2005CVQ001130D 3; HONORABLE ELMA TERESA SALIN A ENDER, JU DGE

_______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.
MEMORA NDUM OPIN ION Appellant

Paradise Vil lage, Inc. b rings thi s restric ted appeal from a defau ltjudgment entered in favor

of appellee Finova Capital Co rporation.
On August 14, 2006, appellant fil ed its brief on appeal. In i ts brief, appell ant argued, among o ther thi ngs , that the trial court erred in granting a default jud gment against appellant

beca use t he co urt la cked juris dict ion. Spec ific ally, appellant referred this court to Benefit Planner

s, L.L.P. v. RenCare, Ltd. , 81 S.W .3d 855 (Tex.App.–Sa n Antonio 2002, pet. denied) in s upport of its ar gument that the j udgment of the tri al court was void because2

the return of citation did not esta blish that (1 ) the person serv ed was in fact the corporation’ s agent for ser vice and ( 2) the corpor ate defendant was s erved.
On September 15, 2006, ap pellee filed a “ motion to reversedefault judgment and remand,” in whic h appellee noted, “[a]fter r eview of Appellant’s brief and supporting case law, Appellant has correctly cited the cas e law and statutory law as it relates to service of process and the default judg ment. Servi ce of process as obtained by Appellee in th e trial court was, if not void, voidable.” After revi ewing t he record, w e agree thejudgment must be reverse d. See Uvalde Coun try Club v . Martin Li

nen Supply Com

pany, Inc ., 690 S.W.2d 884, 885 ( Tex. 1985) (per curiam); Benefit Planners , 81 S.W.3d at 858-59 (and cases cited therein)(noting th ere are no pres umptions in favor of valid is suance, service, and return of citation in t he face of a direct attack on a default jud gment).
We reve rse the tria l court’s judgment and remand the cause to the trial cour t for further proceedings . T EX . R. A PP . P. 43.2(d). Appellee’s motion to reverse default judgment and remand is dismiss ed as moot.

James T. Campbell Justice
### §153. Reservation of lands in North Dakota

Upon receipt of a proper deed from the State of North Dakota, executed under authority of the act of its legislative assembly, approved February 5, 1915, reconveying to the United States title to section 16, township 138 north, range 81 west, fifth principal meridian, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to issue patents to said State for such vacant, surveyed, unreserved, unoccupied, nonmineral public lands as may be selected by said State within its boundaries, not exceeding one thousand two hundred and eighty acres in aggregate area, and said section when so reconveyed shall not be subject to settlement, location, entry, or selection under the public land laws, but shall be reserved for the use of the Department of Agriculture in carrying on experiments in dry-land agriculture at the Northern Great Plains Field Station, Mandan, North Dakota.

(July 3, 1916, ch. 219, 39 Stat. 344.)
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Current industrial reports.MQ32D, Clay construction products.**
 
PDF | TXT
 
SuDoc Number:C 3.158:MQ 32 D
Item Number:0142-A
CGP systemNumber:000352664
 
August 12, 2019
### Docket N o . F /\A Record of Discussion

**~ot3-N..vt** 

### oo 

## Lf 

## -k.D Directorate Identifier: -A D With whom outside th e FAA hn s this AD ac tion been discu sse d (i.e. , Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOl>A, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?



### O R GAN I ZA T JON PERSON CON T ACTED DATE 

### TOP I CS DISCUSSED 

### T

C

CA Roberto La u 12/ 1 1 / 20 12 Regional Airlin e S cott Foose 12 / 11 / 2012 As sociation 

### T

CC A E len a Couture Ongoining The stallls of the rev i s ed 

### AD

Othe r / Additional Information:
TABLE OF CONTENTS     ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS  3      ARTICLE 2. TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES  3      ARTICLE 3. STRATEGIC CONSULTING SERVICE FEE  4      ARTICLE 4. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES  4      ARTICLE 5. CONFIDENTIALITY  4      ARTICLE 6. GOVERNING LAW AND EVENTS OF DEFAULT  4      ARTICLE 7. DISPUTE RESOLUTION  4      ARTICLE 8. EFFECTIVENESS  5      ARTICLE 9. NO SUBSEQUENT OBLIGATION  5      ARTICLE 10. TRANSFER LIMITATION  5      ARTICLE 11. COMPENSATION  5      ARTICLE 12. AMENDMENT  5      ARTICLE 13. COUNTERPARTS  5      ARTICLE 14. MISCELLANEOUS  5      EXHIBIT 1 CONTENT OF THE STRATEGIC CONSULTING SERVICES  6      EXHIBIT 2 STRATEGIC CONSULTING SERVICE FEE  7 
 
2

 
STRATEGIC CONSULTING SERVICE AGREEMENTThis Strategic Consulting Service Agreement (“this Agreement”) is entered into in Beijing, thePeople’s Republic of China (the “PRC”) on February 12, 2009 beween:Party A: Guangzhou Boxin Investment Advisory Co., Ltd.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Gary Ross Nickols

, * From the 29th District

Court of Palo Pinto County,

Trial Court No. 14227

.

Vs. No. 11

- 11

- 00203

- CR * August 30, 2013

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Willson, J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson , J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 10, 2023

No. 04-21-00345-CR

EX PARTE Vanessa Marie VILLANUEVA

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. A1523-1

Honorable Albert D. Pattillo, III, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

On January 20, 2023, appellant filed a “Rehearing Brief,” which we construe as a motion 

for rehearing. After consideration, appellant’s motion is denied.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of February, 2023.

_________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3337 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3337

   To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
 Homeland Security to extend a requirement for the prescreening of air 
  passengers to international flights that overfly the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 19, 2005

     Mr. Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania (for himself and Mr. DeFazio) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
 Homeland Security to extend a requirement for the prescreening of air 
  passengers to international flights that overfly the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRESCREENING OF INTERNATIONAL PASSENGERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 44909(c)(6)(A) of title 49, United States 
Code, is amended by inserting after ``international flight to or from 
the United States'' the following ``, and for any international flight 
that overflys the United States,''.
    (b) Definitions.--Section 44909(c)(6) of such title is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) Definitions.--In this subsection, the 
                following definitions apply:
                            ``(i) International flight that overflys 
                        the united states.--The term `international 
                        flight that overflys the United States' means 
                        any flight departing from a place outside the 
                        United States that transits the territorial 
                        airspace of the United States en route to a 
                        place outside the United States.
                            ``(ii) Territorial airspace of the united 
                        states.--The term `territorial airspace of the 
                        United States' means the airspace over the 
                        United States and the airspace overlying the 
                        territorial waters between the United States 
                        coast and 12 nautical miles from the United 
                        States coast.''.
    (c) Rulemaking.--Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, or a designee of the 
Secretary, shall issue a notice of proposed rulemaking to carry out the 
amendments made by this section.
                                 <all>
```
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway, J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 15, 2009 

# Order

September 15, 2009

139243 & (13)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,
SC: 139243
v CoA: 291838
Macomb CC: 08-4611-FH STEVEN PAUL SIMON, Defendant-Appellant.

___________________ __________________

On order of the Chief Jus tice, defendant-appellant havi ng indicated in writing that he wishes to withdraw his application for le ave to appeal, the app lication for leave to appeal is DISMSSED with prejudice and without costs.