alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsGlobal meteorological data facility for real-time field experiments support and guidanceA Global Meteorological Data Facility (GMDF) has been constructed to provide economical real-time meteorological support to atmospheric field experiments. After collection and analysis of meteorological data sets at a central station, tailored meteorological products are transmitted to experiment field sites using conventional ground link or satellite communication techniques. The GMDF supported the Global Tropospheric Experiment Amazon Boundary Layer Experiment (GTE-ABLE II) based in Manaus, Brazil, during July and August 1985; an arctic airborne lidar survey mission for the Polar Stratospheric Clouds (PSC) experiment during January 1986; and the Genesis of Atlantic Lows Experiment (GALE) during January, February and March 1986. GMDF structure is similar to the UNIDATA concept, including meteorological data from the Zephyr Weather Transmission Service, a mode AAA GOES downlink, and dedicated processors for image manipulation, transmission and display. The GMDF improved field experiment operations in general, with the greatest benefits arising from the ability to communicate with field personnel in real time.Document ID19880012224Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsShipham, Mark C.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Shipley, Scott T.*(ST Systems Corp. Lanham, MD., United States)*Trepte, Charles R.*(SASC Technologies, Inc. Hampton, Va., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1988Subject CategoryMeteorology And ClimatologyReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-4023L-16391NAS 1.15:4023Accession Number88N21608Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 665-45-20-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19880012224.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### **CHAPTER 43—RECREATIONAL VESSELS**

Sec.
4301.
Application.
4302.
Regulations.
4303.
Inspection and testing.
4304.
Importation of nonconforming vessels and equipment.
4305.
Exemptions and equivalents.
4306.
Federal preemption.
4307.
Prohibited acts.
4308.
Termination of unsafe operation.
4309.
Investigation and reporting.
4310.
Repair and replacement of defects.
4311.
Penalties and injunctions.
4312.
Engine cut-off switches.

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Chapter 43 contains the laws applicable to recreational vessels, which originated primarily with the enactment of the Federal Boat Safety Act of 1971 (Public Law 92–75, 85 Stat. 213). That Act embraced a number of activities, but the portion restated in this chapter deals with the establishment of national construction and performance standards for recreational vessels and their associated equipment, the necessary flexible regulatory authority for inspection and testing, Federal preemption, certain necessary prohibited acts, enforcement authority, investigation and reporting requirements, procedures for repair and defect notification, and attendant penalties and injunctive relief. These laws are a direct response to the dramatic increase in the number of recreational boats and the Congressional recognition of the maritime safety problems that recreational boating has imposed upon our more than 25 million miles of waterways.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2021**—Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXIII [LXXXIII], §8318(b), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4700, substituted "Exemptions and equivalents" for "Exemptions" in item 4305.

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–282, title V, §503(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4271, added item 4312.
### §556. Coordination of Federal, State, and local authority

#### (a) Regulation by States, political subdivisions, State and local agencies, and franchising authorities

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to affect any authority of any State, political subdivision, or agency thereof, or franchising authority, regarding matters of public health, safety, and welfare, to the extent consistent with the express provisions of this subchapter.

#### (b) State jurisdiction with regard to cable services

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to restrict a State from exercising jurisdiction with regard to cable services consistent with this subchapter.

#### (c) Preemption

Except as provided in section 557 of this title, any provision of law of any State, political subdivision, or agency thereof, or franchising authority, or any provision of any franchise granted by such authority, which is inconsistent with this chapter shall be deemed to be preempted and superseded.

#### (d) "State" defined

For purposes of this section, the term "State" has the meaning given such term in section 153 of this title.

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title VI, §636, as added Pub. L. 98–549, §2, Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2800; amended Pub. L. 104–104, §3(d)(3), Feb. 8, 1996, 110 Stat. 61.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (c), was in the original "this Act", meaning act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, 48 Stat. 1064, known as the Communications Act of 1934, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 609 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1996—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 104–104 substituted "section 153" for "section 153(v)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 60 days after Oct. 30, 1984, except where otherwise expressly provided, see section 9(a) of Pub. L. 98–549, set out as a note under section 521 of this title.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 10384 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

JESUS GARCIA, also known as Chucho

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:13

- CR

- 440

- 8

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Jesus Garcia has moved for leave to

withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Garcia h a s not filed a response. We ha ve reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 10, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-10384 Document: 00513871517 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/10/2017No. 16

- 10384

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-10384 Document: 00513871517 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/10/2017
§ 891.530 Prepayment privileges. ( a ) The prepayment (whether in whole or in part) or the assignment or transfer of physical and financial assets of any Section 202 project is prohibited, unless the Secretary gives prior written approval.
( b ) The Secretary may not grant approval unless he or she has determined that the prepayment or transfer of the loan is part of a transaction that will ensure the continued operation of the project, until the original maturity date of the loan, in a manner that will provide rental housing for the elderly and handicapped on terms at least as advantageous to existing and future tenants as the terms required by the original Section 202 loan agreement and any other loan agreements entered into under other provisions of law.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3328 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3328

         For the relief of Gerald Robert Christopher Haefelin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 18, 2005

  Mr. Spratt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         For the relief of Gerald Robert Christopher Haefelin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR GERALD ROBERT CHRISTOPHER 
              HAEFELIN.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Gerald Robert Christopher 
Haefelin shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for 
adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 
permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of 
status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Gerald Robert Christopher Haefelin 
enters the United States before the filing deadline specified in 
subsection (c), he shall be considered to have entered and remained 
lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment 
of status under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as 
of the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Gerald Robert Christopher 
Haefelin, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to 
reduce by 1, during the current or next following fiscal year, the 
total number of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of 
the country of the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Gerald Robert 
Christopher Haefelin shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be 
accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and 
Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
### §§326 to 330. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 326 to 330, relating to Territory of Alaska, were omitted in view of admission of Alaska into the Union.

Section 326, acts Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 225, title II, 43 Stat. 930; June 30, 1932, ch. 320, §1, 47 Stat. 446, authorized incurring of obligations for roads, bridges, and trails in advance of appropriations in certain cases.

Section 327, acts June 30, 1921, ch. 33, §1, 42 Stat. 90; June 30, 1932, ch. 320, §1, 47 Stat. 446, authorized Secretary of the Interior to accept contributions from Territory or from other sources for use in construction, maintenance, or repair of roads, bridges, ferries, trails, and related works in the Territory.

Section 328, act July 9, 1918, ch. 143, 40 Stat. 863, related to estimates for work on roads.

Section 329, acts Jan. 27, 1905, ch. 277, §2, 33 Stat. 616; May 14, 1906, ch. 2458, §2, 34 Stat. 192, related to expenses of board in addition to salary.

Section 330, act Apr. 27, 1914, ch. 72, 38 Stat. 366, related to per diem commutation of Army officer member of board.
#### Alan F. McHenry, Appellant, v Sigmund Kramer, Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered December 13, 1976, is unanimously modified, on the law, and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of striking all decretal paragraphs, except the third decretal paragraph which directs the amendment of the summons and complaint by adding the name of Pia Chelwood as a party defendant, and directing that either party may serve said Pia Chelwood if such party is able to and wishes *950to do so, but if said Pia Chelwood is not served, the action shall proceed without her, and, as so modified, the order is affirmed, with $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal to plaintiff. The action is for rent. Plaintiff is one of two tenants in common who own the rented property; Pia Chelwood is the other owner. In such circumstances Pia Chelwood should be joined as a party, either as plaintiff if she will join as plaintiff, or as defendant if she will not join as plaintiff and if she is amenable to service. But Special Term directed plaintiff to serve said additional party. However, said additional party, Pia Chelwood, is not a resident of New York but apparently of either England or Switzerland and it is extremely doubtful whether she can be served by process issued out of the courts of New York. In the extremely similar case of *Keane v Chambers*(271 NY 326, 330), the Court of Appeals said: "To command a party to be brought in where there is no process to bring him in and no jurisdiction over him lacks sense. Parties who are united in interest must be joined as plaintiffs or be brought into the action as defendants, pursuant to this section 194 of the Civil Practice Act, where they are within the jurisdiction of the court, so that the judgment may effectually bind them. Where any of such parties are without the State, and cannot be served or brought into the action effectually, they need not be parties, and an order would be improperly granted which directed that they be made parties.” However, as defendant contends that said Pia Chelwood may be amenable to service by process issued out of the New York State courts, and indeed, defendant wishes to assert a counterclaim against said Pia Chelwood, we permit her name to be added as a party so that either party may serve her if they wish to do so and can do so. If she is not served, however, the action can continue without her. Concur—Silverman, J. P., Fein, Lane, Sandler and Sullivan, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     I, Richard P. Brown, Chief Executive Officer of American Casino & Entertainment Properties LLC(the “Registrant”), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the annualreport on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 of the Registrant (the “Report”): (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.     By: /s/ Richard P. Brown     Richard P. Brown    President and Chief Executive Officer of    American Casino & Entertainment Properties LLC       Date: March 6, 2007
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-23-0000387

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

L.Z., Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

J.Z., Defendant-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

(CASE NO. 5DV211000175)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

(By: Hiraoka, Presiding Judge, Wadsworth and Guidry, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears that:

(1) The statement of jurisdiction and opening brief

were due on or before August 21, 2023, and September 18, 2023,

respectively; 

(2) Self-represented Defendant-Appellant J.Z. (JZ)

failed to file either document, or request an extension of time;

(3) On September 26, 2023, the appellate clerk entered

a default notice informing JZ that the time for filing the

statement of jurisdiction and opening brief had expired, the

matter would be called to the court's attention on October 6,

2023, for appropriate action, which could include dismissal of

the appeal under Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure

Rules 12.1(e) and 30, and JZ could request relief from default by

motion; and

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-23-0000387

16-NOV-2023

08:29 AM

Dkt. 13 ODSD
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

(4) JZ has not taken any further action in this appeal.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is

dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, November 16, 2023.

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka

Presiding Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth

Associate Judge

/s/ Kimberly T. Guidry

Associate Judge

2
Document

Exhibit 10.26

AMENDMENT TO FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED
TRANSDIGM GROUP INCORPORATED
2006 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN DIVIDEND EQUIVALENT PLAN


WHEREAS, TransDigm Group Incorporated (the “Company”) currently maintains and sponsors the Fourth Amended and Restated TransDigm Group Incorporated 2006 Stock Incentive Plan Dividend Equivalent Plan (the “Plan”); and
WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company wishes to amend the Plan in accordance with the provisions of Section 5(a) of the Plan..
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:
Section 4(a)(ii) of the plan is amended to change the words “record date” in two places in the first sentence to “ex-dividend date”.
This Amendment shall be effective as of October 26, 2022.
Except as modified by this Amendment, all of the terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain valid and in full force and effect.
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment was duly adopted by the Compensation Committee on October 26, 2022.
 
									
			
	TRANSDIGM GROUP INCORPORATED
		
	By	 	/s/ Halle Martin
		 	Halle Martin, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3343 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3343

       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Nemacur VL.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 19, 2005

Mr. Jefferson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Nemacur VL.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NEMACUR VL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.60 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Nemacur VL) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Zhao Zhiwei, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of China Finance Online Co.
Limited;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: May 23, 2006


/s/ Zhao Zhiwei
_______________________________
Name: Zhao Zhiwei
Title: Chief Executive Officer
### §§615k to 615n. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 615k, act Aug. 6, 1956, ch. 981, §1, 70 Stat. 1059, authorized construction, operation, and maintenance of Little Wood River Project, Idaho.

Section 615l, act Aug. 6, 1956, ch. 981, §2, 70 Stat. 1059, related to construction, operation, and maintenance of public recreational facilities in connection with this project.

Section 615m, act Aug. 6, 1956, ch. 981, §3, 70 Stat. 1059, related to preservation of fish and wildlife in connection with this project and the operation of this project in accordance with water rights.

Section 615n, act Aug. 6, 1956, ch. 981, §4, 70 Stat. 1060, related to authorization of appropriations for this project.