# Eagle Drones, llc. Petition for Exemption Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012

Eagle Drones, llc. Attn: Tyler Raymond Sepp, Owner 8910 W. Salter Dr. Peoria, AZ 85382 Ph: +1 (602) 904-1007 Email: Tsepp@gmail.comU.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington DC 20590

Exemption Request Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Refo rm Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations from: 14 CFR 21 subpart H; 14 CFR 45.23(b); 14 CFR 61.113(a) and (b); 14 CFR 91.7(a); 14 CFR 91.9(b)(2); 14 CFR 91.103; 14 CFR 91.109; 14 CFR 91.119(c); 14 CFR 91.121; 14 CFR 91.151(a); 14 CFR 91.203 (a) and (b); 14 CFR 91.405 (a); 14 CFR 91.407 (a) (1) 14 CFR 91.409 (a)(1) and (2); 14 CFR 91.417(a) and (b)

Dear Sir or Madam:
Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the “Reform Act”) and 14 CFR Part 11, Eagle Drones, llc., operator of an Unmanned Aircraft Sy stem (UAS), hereby applies for an exemption from the listed Federal Aviation Regulations (“FARs ”) to allow commercial operation of it s UAS, so long as such operations are conducted within and under the conditions outlined herein or as may be established by the FAA as required by Section 333. 

### Eagle Drones Summary of Petition
Commercial operation of an UAS, as described herein, which are equipped with camera(s) and sensors, would operate in the following manner:

• Aerial photography and/or video for public and/or private use including real estate, agriculture, architecture, land surveying, engineering and other related professional activities.

• Aerial video and/or photo graphy for public and/or private use including television, public events, cinematography and news gathering.

• Aerial inspection/photography of residential/commercial structures under contract with the owners or local government authority.

• Aerial inspection/photography of re sidential/commercial utility infrastruc ture including but not limited to electrical power lines, wind turbines and cell towers.

• Aerial video/photography or providin g live video feed to assist with sear ch and rescue operations in cases of an emergency or natural disaster only when the local authorities or government has requested it by contract or donation.

• The ability to offer training to persons individually or belonging to both private and/or public organizations that have interests in the use and applic ation of a UAS for the purpose of the safe operation of a UAS to enhance the safety of the National Airspa ce System (NAS) as well as for the protection of the persons and property.As described fully below, the requested exemption would permit the operation of a UAS under controlled conditions in the NAS that would be a) limited b) controlled c) predet ermined and d) will provide safety enhancements to the already safe operatio ns in the industry presently using conv entional aircraft. Approval of this exemption would thereby enhance safety and fulfill the Se cretary of Transportation’s (the FAA Administrator’s) responsibilities to “....establish re quirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system.”
The name and address of the applicant is:
Eagle Drones, llc. Tyler Raymond Sepp, Owner Address: 8910 W. Salter Dr. Peoria, AZ 85382 Ph: +1 (602) 904-1007 Email: Tsepp@gmail.com



### AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS TO BE OPERATED

a) DJI Spreading Wings S1000, with a total weight of 11.0kg or 24.25lbs with a MTOW not to exceed 54.99lbs. The dimensions are 1045mm x 586mm. The DJI Spread ing Wings S1000 has the ability to hover and move along a vertical and horizontal plane simultaneously. The DJI Spreading Wings S1000 has eight motors, Motor KV is 400rpm/V, powered by Lithium Polymer battery(s). There are eight propellers, Propeller Model 1552/1552R, in use. The DJI Spreading Wings S1000 will be contro lled with a remote controller with an operating frequency of 2.400GHz – 2.483GHz. The live video feed will have an operating frequency of 5.728GHz – 5.850GHz.
b) DJI Inspire 1 Pro , with a total weight of 3500g or 7.72lbs. The dimensions are 438mm x 451mm x 301mm or 17.24inch x 17.75inch x 11.85inch. Under still air the maximum speed is no more than 18m/s or 40.27mph with a cruising speed of 11m/s or 25mph. The DJI In spire 1 Pro has the ability to hover and move along a vertical and horizontal plane simultaneously. The DJI Inspire 1 has four motors, Motor Model DJI 3510H, powered by a 6-cell 4500mAh or 5700mAh Lithium Polymer battery. There are four propellers, Propeller Model DJI 1345, in use. The DJI Inspire 1 Pro will be controlled with the C1 re mote controller with an operating frequency of 2.400GHz – 2.483GHz. The liv e video feed will have an operating frequency of 5.728GHz – 5.850GHz.
c) DJI Inspire 1 , Model T600, with a total weight of 2935g or 6.47lbs. The dimensions are 438mm x 451mm x 301mm or 17.24inch x 17.75inch x 11.8 5inch. Under still air the maximum speed is no more than 22m/s or 49mph with a cruising speed of 11m/s or 25mph. The DJ I Inspire 1 has the ability to hover and move along a vertical and horizontal plane simultaneously. The DJ I Inspire 1 has four motors, Motor Model DJI 3510, powered by a 6-cell 4500mAh or 5700mAh Lithium Polymer battery. There are four propellers, Propeller Model DJI 1345, in use. The DJI Inspire 1 will be contro lled with the C1 remote controller with an operating frequency of 2.400GHz – 2.483GHz. The live video fe ed will have an operating frequency of 5.728GHz – 5.850GHz.

d) DJI Phantom 3 , with a total weight of less than 1500g or 3.30l bs. The diagonal size (including propellers) is 590mm or 23.23inch. Under still air the maximum speed is no more than 16m/s or 35mph with a cruising speed of 8m/s or 18mph. The DJI Phantom 3 has the abilit y to hover and move along a vertical and horizontalplane simultaneously. The DJI Phantom 3 has four moto rs and is powered by a 4S Lithium Polymer battery, 4480MAH – 15.2V. The DJI Phantom 3 will be controlled wi th a remote controller with an operating frequency of 2.4 GHz

- 2.483 GHz. The live video will be at frequency of 2.4GHz.

The applicant will operate the UAS in line of sight within a closed off and predetermine d area owned and/operated by the property representative.

Given the small size of the UAS and the controlled environm ent provided the proposed operations will adhere to the Reform Act’s safety requirements. The approval of th is application presents no national security issues. Regarding the level of safety surrounding the proposed operations and the public benefit, reduction in environmental impacts, including bu t not limited to reduced emissions a nd noise, the grant of the requested exemption is in the public interest. Accordingly th e applicant requests that the FAA grant the requested exemption with minimum delay.


### AIRCRAFT AND EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF SAFETY
The operation limitations proposed for an equivalent or higher level of sa fety because operations will further enhance the safety of the persons and/or property using conventional aircraft.

These limitations and conditions to wh ich the applicant agrees to adhere to when conducting commercial operations under the FAA issued exemption as set fort h in the Flight Operations Manual (FOM ) include:

• The UAS will weigh less than 55 lbs.

• The UAS will have a maximum operatin g speed of no more than 50mph.

• Flights will be operated within line of sight of the Pilot in Command (P IC) and/or Visual Observer (VO).

• Maximum flight time for each operational flight will be 30 minutes. Flights will be terminated at 20% battery power reserve or 45 minutes of flight time whichever occurs first.

• Flights will be operated at an alti tude of no more than 400 feet Ab ove Ground Level (AGL) and not more than 200 feet above an elevated plat form from which filming is planned.

• Minimum crew for each operation will consist of the UA S Pilot, the Visual Observ er (VO) and may include but not limited to a Camera Operator.

• A briefing will be performed regardin g the planned UAS operations prior to each day’s flight consisting of all the days’ production activities.

• All flights will occur under Visual Flight Rules Meteorological Conditions (VMC) only.

• The flights will occur no closer than a 5 mile radius of the geographic center/Airport Reference Point (ARP) of a tower controlled or uncontrolled airport un less additional authorizations have been acquired.• The operator will file FAA Fo rm 7711-1, or its equivalent , as modified in light of the requested exemption, with the appropriate local Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) no more than 72 hours but no less than 48 hours from planned operation.

• The operator will obtain verbal/written consent of a ll persons involved with the planned operation and ensure that only consenting persons will be allowed within 100 feet of the flight operation, and the radius may be reduced to 30 feet based upon an equivalent level of safety determination, as required under the FOM. With the advanced permissio n of the FSDO, operations at closer range may be approved.

• The PIC and VO will have been trai ned in operation of UA S and receive up-to-date information for the particular UAS to be operated.

• Written and/or verbal permission and permits will be obtained from territorial , state, county or city jurisdictions, including law en forcement, fire or other appropriate governmental agencies.

• If the UAS loses communications with the remote controller or loses GP S signal, the UAS will have the capability to return to a pre-dete rmined location within a designate d location and land autonomously.

• The UAS will have the capability to abort a flight in case of unpredicted obstacles, weather, or emergencies.


### REGULATIONS FROM WHICH EXEMPTION IS REQUESTED

14 CFR Part 21 subpart H 14 CFR 45.23 (b) 14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b) 14 CFR 91.7 (a) 14 CFR 91.9 (b) (2) 14 CFR 91.103 14 CFR 91.109 14 CFR 91.119 (c) 14 CFR 91.121 14 CFR 91.151 (a) 14 CFR 91.203 (a) & (b) 14 CFR 91.405 (a) 14 CFR 91.407 (a) (1) 14 CFR 91.409 (a) (2) 14 CFR 91.417 (a) & (b)

14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H: Airworthines s Certificates 14 C. F.R. §91.203 (a) (1)
Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, estab lishes the procedural requirements for the issuance of airworthiness certificates as required by FAR §91.203 (a) (1). Given the size and limited operating area associated with the aircraft to be utilized by th e Applicant, an exemption from Part 21 Subpart H meets the requirements of an equivalent level of safety under Part 11 and Section 333 of the Reform Act. The Federal Aviation Act (49U.S.C.§44701 (f)) and Section 333 of the Reform Act bo th authorize the FAA to exempt aircraft from the requirement for an airworthiness certific ate, upon consideration of the size, weight, speed, operational capability, and proximity to airports and populated areas of the partic ular UAS. In all cases, an analysis of these criteria demonstrates that the UAS operated without an airworthin ess certificate, in the rest ricted environment and under the conditions proposed will be at least as safe, or safer, than a conventional aircraft (fixed wing or rotorcraft) operating with an airworthiness certificate with out the restrictions and conditions proposed.
The UAS to be operated hereunder is less than 55 lbs. fully loaded, carries neither a pilot nor passenger, carries no explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, and oper ates exclusively within a secured and designated area. Unlike other civil aircraft, operations under this exemptio n will be tightly controlled and monitored by both the operator and under the requirements and in compliance with local public safety requi rements. The FAA will have advance notice of all operations. These safety enhancements provide a greater degree of safety to the public and property owners than conventional operations conducted with airworthiness certificates issued under 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Lastly, application of these same criteria demonstrates that there is no credible threat to national security posed by the UAS, due to its size, speed of operation, loca tion of operation, lack of explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, and inab ility to carry a substantial external load.
14 C.F.R. § 45.23 (b). Marking of the Aircraft
The regulation requires: When marks include only the Roman capital letter "N" and the registration number is displayed on limited, restricted or light-sport category aircraft or experimental or provisionally certificated aircraft, the operator must also display on that aircraft near each entrance to the ca bin, cockpit, or pilot station, in letters not less than 2 inches nor more than 6 inches high, the words "limit ed," "restricted," "light-s port," "experimental," or "provisional," as applicable.
Even though the UAS will have no airw orthiness certificate, an exemption may be needed as the UAS will have no entrance to the cabin, cockpit or pilot station on which the word “Experimental” can be placed. Given the size of the UAS, two-inch lettering will be impossible. The word “Experimental” will be pl aced on the fuselage in compliance with §45.29 (f).
The equivalent level of safety will be provided by ha ving the UAS marked on its fuselage as required by §45.29 (f) where the pilot, observer a nd others working with the UAS will se e the identification of the UAS as “Experimental.”
14 C.F.R. § 61.113 (a) and (b): Private Pilo t Privileges and Limitations: Pilot in Command.
Pursuant to 14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b), no person who hold s a private pilot certificate ma y act as a pilot in command of an aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or hire. Eagle Drones, llc. may achieve an equivalent level of safety as achieved by current Regulati ons because the applicant’s UAS do not carry any pilots or passengers nor property. The risks attend ant to the operation of UA S is far less than the risk levels inherent in the commercial activities outlined in 14 CF R 61. The PIC will complete safety tr aining annually and have a minimum of 20 hours of flight time with the UAS before any commercial flight activity is conducted which I feel will equate to the safe operation of the UAS.14 C.F.R. §91.7(a): Civil Aircraft Airworthiness.
The regulation requires that no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in airworthy condition. As there will be no airworthiness certificate issued for the aircraft, should this exempt ion be granted, no FAA regulatory standard will exist for determining airworthiness. Given th e size of the aircraft for ma intenance and use of safety check lists prior to each flight an equiva lent level of safety will be provided.
14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b) (2): Civil Aircraft Flight Manual in the Aircraft.
Section 91.9 (b) (2) provides: No person may operate a U.S.-registered civil airc raft ... (2) For which an Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual is not required by §21.5 of this ch apter, unless there is available in the aircraft a current approved airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual, appr oved manual material, markings, and placards, or any combination thereof. The UAS, given its size and configurat ion has no ability or place to carry such a flight manual on the aircraft, not only because there is no pilot on board, but because there is no room or capacity to carry such an item on the aircraft. The equivalent level of safety will be maintained by keeping the flig ht manual at the ground control point where the pilot flying the UAS will have immediate access to it.
14 C.F.R. § 91.103: Preflight Action.
This regulation requires each pilot in comma nd to take certain actions before flight to insure the safety of flight. As FAA approved rotorcraft flight manuals will not be provid ed for the aircraft an exem ption will be needed. The PIC will take all actions as stated in th e FOM in Section 4 under Normal Proc edures including bu t not limited to reviewing weather, flight battery requirements, landing and takeoff distances and aircraft performance data before initiation of flight.
14 C.F.R. §91.109: Flight Instruction.
Section 91.103 provides that no person may operate a civil aircraft (except a manned free balloon) that is being used for flight instruction unless that aircraft has fully functioning dual controls. UAS and remotely piloted aircraft, by their design do not have fully func tional dual controls. Flight control is accomplished through the use of a control box that communicates with the aircraft via radi o communications. The FAA has approved exemptions for flight training without fully functional dual controls for a number of aircraft and for flight instruction in experimental aircraft. The equivalent level of safety prov ided by the fact that neither a pilot nor passengers will be carried in the aircraft and by th e size and speed of the aircraft.

14 C.F.R. §91.119: Minimum Safe Altitudes.

Section 91.119 establishes safe altitude s for operation of civil aircraft. Sectio n 91.119 (d) allows helicopters to be operated at less than the minimums prescribed, provided the person oper ating the helicopter complies with any route or altitudes prescribed for helicopters by the FAA. As this exemption is for a UAS that is a helicopter and the exemption requests authority to operate at altitudes up to 400 AGL, or not more th an 200 above an elevated platform from which filming is planned, an exemption may be needed to allow such operations. As set forth herein, the UAS will never operate at higher than 400 AGL with the exception that in circumstances where the UAS is used to survey or photograph a stru cture whose height exceeds 400 feet AG L, the UAS will not be operated more than 200 feet above the highest point on the structure. It will however be operated in a restricted area with security perimeter, where buildings and people will not be exposed to operations without their pre-obtained consent.The equivalent level of safety will be achieved given the size, weight, speed of the UAS as well as the location where it is operated. No flight will be taken without the permission of the property owner or local officials. Because of the advance notice to the property owner an d participants in the film ing activity, all affected individuals will be aware of the planned flight operations. Comp ared to flight operations with aircraft or rotorcraft weighting far more than the maximum 55l bs. proposed herein and the lack of flammable fuel, any risk associated with these operations is far less than those presently pres ented with conventional aircraft operating at or below 500 AGL. In addition, the lo w-altitude operations of the UAS will ensure separation between these UAS operations and the operations of conventional aircraft that must comply with Section 91.119.
14 C.F.R. §91.121 Altimeter Settings.
This regulation requires each person operating an aircraft to maintain cruising altitude by reference to an altimeter that is set “...to the elevation of the departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure.” As the UAS may not have a barometric altimeter, but instead a GPS altitude read out, an exemption may be needed. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by the operator , pursuant to the safety check list and live flight data monitoring, confirming the altitude of the launch site shown on the GPS altitude indicator before flight.
14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a): Fuel Requireme nts for Flight in VFR Conditions
Section 91.151 (a) prohibits an individual from beginnin g “a flight in an airplane under VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to th e first point of intended landing, and, assuming normal cruising sp eed – (1) During the day, to fly afte r that for at least 30 minutes; or (2) At night, to fly after that for at least 45 minutes.”
The battery powering the UAS provides approximately 40 minutes of powered flight. To meet the 40 minute reserve requirement in 14 CFR §91.151, UAS flights would be limited to appr oximately 30 minutes in length. Given the limitations on the UAS’s proposed flight area an d the location of its prop osed operations within a predetermined area, a longer time frame for flight in daylight or twilight VFR conditions is reasonable.
Applicant believes that an exemption fr om 14 CFR §91.151(a) falls within the scope of prior exemptions. Operating the UAS, in a tightly controlled area wh ere only people and property owners or official representatives who have signed waivers will be allowed, with less than 30 minutes of reserve fuel, does not engender the type of risks that Section 91.151(a) was intended to alleviate given the size and speed of the small UAS. Additionally, limiting UAS flights to 10 minutes would greatly re duce the utility for which the exemptio n will be granted. Applicant believes that an equivalent level of safety can be achieved by limiting flights to 30 minutes or 25% of battery power— whichever happens first. This restriction would be more than adequate to return the UAS to its planned landing zone from anywhere in its limited operating area.
14 C.F.R. §91.203 (a) and (b): Carrying Civil Aircraft Certification and Registration
The regulation provides in pertinent part:
(a) Except as provided in § 91.715, no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it has within it the following:
(1) An appropriate and current ai rworthiness certificate. . . .(b) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless the airw orthiness certificate required by paragraph (a) of this section or a special flight authorizatio n issued under §91.715 is disp layed at the cabin or cock pit entrance so that it is legible to passengers or crew.
The UAS fully loaded weighs no more than 55 lbs. and is operated without an onboard pilot. As such, there is no ability or place to carry certification and registrati on documents or to disp lay them on the UAS.
An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by keep ing these documents at the ground control point where the pilot flying the UAS will have immediate access to them , to the extent they are applicable to the UAS.
14 C.F.R. §91.405 (a); 407 (a) (1); 409 (a) (2); 417(a) & (b): Maintenance Inspections.

These regulations require that an aircra ft operator or owner “shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter...,” and others sh all inspect or maintain the aircraft in compliance with Part 43.
Given that these section and Part 43 apply only to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, these sections will not apply to the applicant. Maintenance will be accomplished by the operator pursuant to the flight manual and operating handbook. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because the UAS is very limited in size and will carry a small payload and operate only in restricted areas fo r a limited period of time. If mechanical issues arise the UAS can land immediately and will be operating from no hi gher than 400 feet AGL. Th e operator will ensure that the UAS is in working order prior to initiating flight , perform required maintenance, and keep a log of any maintenance performed. Moreover, the operator is the person most familiar with the ai rcraft and best suited to maintain the aircraft in an airworthy conditio n to provide the equivalent level of safety.
An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because maintenance an d inspections will be performed in accordance with the UAS Manufacturer's User Manual. As provided in the FOM, the op erator will ensure that the UAS is in working order prior to initiating flight and perform required maintenance needed.Additional Information
The applicant, Tyler R. Sepp, Owner of Eagle Drones, llc., has been involved in the aviation industry for more than 15 years. Also the primary pilot, Tyler Sepp has an in-d epth understanding of the capa bilities and safety concerns involved in using this technology as an asset to the co mmunity and has safely prefor med aerial inspections in
manned aircraft. Satisfaction of criter ia provided in Section 333 of the Reform Act of 2012 provides more than adequate justification for the grant of the requested exemptions a llowing the commercial operation of the applicant’s UAS into the national airspace system.



### February, 17, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

Tyler Raymond Sepp, Owner
Eagle Drones, llc.
Address: 8910 W. Salter Dr. Peoria, AZ 85382
Ph: +1 (602) 904-1007

Email: Tsepp@gmail.com