alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §765a. Signatory role

#### (a) Limitations on signatories

#### (1) National security limitations

The Federal Communications Commission, after a public interest determination, in consultation with the executive branch, may restrict foreign ownership of a United States signatory if the Commission determines that not to do so would constitute a threat to national security.

#### (2) No signatories required

The United States Government shall not require signatories to represent the United States in INTELSAT or Inmarsat or in any successor entities after a pro-competitive privatization is achieved consistent with sections 763, 763a, and 763c 1 of this title.

#### (b) Clarification of privileges and immunities of COMSAT

#### (1) Generally not immunized

Notwithstanding any other law or executive agreement, COMSAT shall not be entitled to any privileges or immunities under the laws of the United States or any State on the basis of its status as a signatory of INTELSAT or Inmarsat.

#### (2) Limited immunity

COMSAT or any successor in interest shall not be liable for action taken by it in carrying out the specific, written instruction of the United States issued in connection with its relationships and activities with foreign governments, international entities, and the intergovernmental satellite organizations.

#### (3) No joint or several liability

If COMSAT is found liable for any action taken in its status as a signatory or a representative of the party to INTELSAT, any such liability shall be limited to the portion of the judgment that corresponds to COMSAT's percentage of the ownership of INTELSAT at the time the activity began which lead to the liability.

#### (4) Provisions prospective

Paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to liability for any action taken by COMSAT before March 17, 2000.

#### (c) Parity of treatment

Notwithstanding any other law or executive agreement, the Commission shall have the authority to impose similar regulatory fees on the United States signatory which it imposes on other entities providing similar services.

(Pub. L. 87–624, title VI, §642, as added Pub. L. 106–180, §3, Mar. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 55.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 763c of this title, referred to in subsec. (a)(2), was amended generally by Pub. L. 109–34, §3, July 12, 2005, 119 Stat. 377, and no longer relates to specific criteria for Inmarsat privatization.

1 See References in Text note below.
National Institute of Justice • Strengthen Science • Advance Justice

April 2015 NCJ 248675

U.S. Department of Justice

Office of Justice Programs

National Institute of Justice

Investments in research have dramatically improved the science of forensic DNA testing and our understanding 

of sexual assault kits. Here are Five Things we know and don’t yet know based on research to date: 

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE

FIVE THINGS

A B O U T S E X U A L A S S A U LT K I T S 

4. Even if the police have a suspect, testing a kit can be

useful for a number of reasons. 

In the majority of sexual assault cases, the victim knows the perpetrator, 

which may be one reason police might not send a kit to the lab — they 

do not need to confirm the identity of the suspect. But DNA collected in 

cases with known suspects and entered into the national DNA database 

could link suspects to other crimes, including other sexual assaults. 

5. The cost to test a sexual assault kit varies widely. 

Several factors affect the cost, including the nature and complexity 

of the evidence and the prices labs have negotiated with vendors. 

Costs also vary for validating DNA profiles, uploading profiles into the 

national database, and conducting the necessary follow-up case work, 

including investigation and prosecution. 

With continued scientific investment, NIJ believes testing will become 

faster and cost less and that systems can be put into place to 

improve the way evidence is tracked. Scientific investments will also 

help professionals identify practices that lead to the best ways for 

investigating and prosecuting sexual assault cases. 

Learn more at NIJ.gov, keywords “Five Things” 

1. No one knows the number of kits nationwide that

have not been submitted for testing. 

Most kits that have not been tested are in police custody, not in crime 

labs. There is no national estimate of these unsubmitted kits. One first 

step to knowing the number and nature of unsubmitted kits is for local 

agencies to conduct audits. 

2. Little is known about the age of unsubmitted kits. 

Today, DNA testing is common, but 10 years ago it was not. Experts 

hypothesize that a large proportion of unsubmitted kits may be from 

older cases. Knowing how old unsubmitted kits are is important 

because older cases are processed and investigated differently 

than more recent cases. In older cases, evidence may be degraded, 

cases may have been adjudicated, victims may need to be notified in 

different ways, and suspects may be more difficult to locate. 

3. Submitting a kit to a crime lab does not mean the

lab will obtain usable DNA. 

Not all kits contain biological evidence. Not all biological evidence 

yields usable DNA. Sometimes evidence is so severely degraded the 

lab cannot obtain a DNA profile. 

Points of view, findings, and opinions reported here are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policies or positions of the U.S. Department of Justice.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATION AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001021907
<NAME> MS ACQUISITION CORP.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-29-1997
<CASH>                                              40
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,865
<ALLOWANCES>                                       333
<INVENTORY>                                      8,139
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,963
<PP&E>                                          88,441
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,096
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 134,581
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,763
<BONDS>                                         91,802
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           12,635
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                    (23,565)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   134,581
<SALES>                                        103,789
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               103,789
<CGS>                                           89,687
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   89,687
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,798
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,728
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    576
<INCOME-TAX>                                       231
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                345
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       345
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATE OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND**

**ACTING PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**OF**

**QUANTUM ENERGY INC.**

I, Sharon Farris, President, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer of Quantum Energy Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the annual report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2009 (the “Report”):

|   | a. | complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at February 28, 2009, and the results of the Company’s operations for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                 |   |   |   |                                                                        |
|----------------------|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  June 12, 2009 |   |   |   | /s/ Sharon Farris                                                           |
|                 |   |   |   |                                                                        |
|                 |   |   |   | Sharon Farris                                                               |
|                 |   |   |   | *President, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer* |
### §413. Designation of agent for service; method of service

It shall be the duty of every carrier subject to this chapter to designate in writing an agent in the District of Columbia, upon whom service of all notices and process and all orders, decisions, and requirements of the Commission may be made for and on behalf of said carrier in any proceeding or suit pending before the Commission, and to file such designation in the office of the secretary of the Commission, which designation may from time to time be changed by like writing similarly filed; and thereupon service of all notices and process and orders, decisions, and requirements of the Commission may be made upon such carrier by leaving a copy thereof with such designated agent at his office or usual place of residence in the District of Columbia, with like effect as if made personally upon such carrier, and in default of such designation of such agent, service of any notice or other process in any proceeding before said Commission, or of any order, decision, or requirement of the Commission, may be made by posting such notice, process, order, requirement, or decision in the office of the secretary of the Commission.

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title IV, §413, 48 Stat. 1099; Pub. L. 103–414, title III, §304(a)(11), Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4297.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, 48 Stat. 1064, known as the Communications Act of 1934, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 609 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–414 struck out ", within sixty days after the taking effect of this chapter," after "every carrier subject to this chapter".
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF IMPSAT CORPORATION AND ITS CONSOLIDATED
SUBSIDIARIES AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         151,501
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,094
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,935
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               230,517
<PP&E>                                         346,894
<DEPRECIATION>                                 147,862
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 632,023
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           96,581
<BONDS>                                        388,784
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          141,853
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       120,951
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   632,023
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               111,218
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  109,551
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,550
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,055
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,106
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (34,989)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,017
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (37,948)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                              ---------------------

                                   FORM 10-Q/A

                QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                  For Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 1996

                         Commission File Number 0-21369

                               VITECH AMERICA, INC
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

         FLORIDA                                              65 041 9086
(State of incorporation)                               (I.R.S. Employer ID No.)

                            8807 Northwest 23 Street
                            Miami, Florida 33172-2419
               (Address of principal executive offices, zip code)

       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (305) 477-1161

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ___  No _X_

         As of December 2, 1996, there were 10,722,457 shares of the Common
Stock of the Company, no par value, outstanding.


<PAGE>


                              II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6.  EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a)  Exhibits required by item 601 of Regulation S-K

         27.1     Financial Data Schedule

(b)  Reports on Form 8-K.

         None.

                                    SIGNATURE

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Vitech America, Inc.

By:  /s/  MITCHELL E. ASHER
     ----------------------
Mitchell E. Asher
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(authorized officer and chief accounting officer)

Date:  January 29, 1997


<PAGE>


                               INDEX TO EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT
NUMBER       DESCRIPTION
-------      -----------
 27.1        Financial Data Schedule
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CB Richard Ellis Realty Trust (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack A. Cuneo, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    JACK A.
CUNEOJack A. Cuneo President and Chief Executive Officer


March 31, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 238 (Thursday, December 10, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 79534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27078]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and First-Class Package Service 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 10, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 1, 2020, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & First-Class Package Service Contract 179 
to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2021-37, CP2021-38.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2020-27078 Filed 12-9-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert A. Morrison, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of HS3 Technologies Inc.
      for the year ended June 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of HS3 Technologies Inc.                                                           

Dated: September 28, 2010

| | /s/
      Robert A. Morrison 
| | -----------------------------
| | Robert A. Morrison           
| | President and Director       
| | (Principal Executive Officer)
| | HS3 Technologies Inc.        



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to HS3 Technologies
Inc. and will be retained by HS3 Technologies Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
### From: Michael.Pelan@lafarge

- na.com

To: Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 06/08/2012 11:38 AM

Subject: Revised PM limit

Keith:

I realize that we are still a few days away from seeing the proposed NESHAP

reconsideration rulemaking. However, I wanted to ask you a question or two

regarding the expected revision to the PM standard.

Based on the information EPA has shared with the industry, the revised

existing source PM limit (believed to be 0.07 lb/ton clinker) will be based

on a 3

- hr stack testing basis with PM CEMS used as a parametric monitoring

requirement.

Given this to be accurate, I was wondering how EPA went from a May 6, 2009

proposed limit of 0.085 l b/ton clinker based on 3

- hr stack testing data, to

the revised limit of 0.07 lb/ton clinker based on 3

- hr stack testing data?

Did EPA use different PM data in its floor calculation or revise the

methodology (i.e., UPL formula) for calculating the revised e xisting source

limit?

I am expecting that we will have a very limited comment period on this

rulemaking. Therefore, would it be possible to get a copy of the PM

analysis asap (I'm assuming that it is not yet posted to the docket)?

Thanks,

Michael L. Pe lan

Director, Environmental Compliance and Air Programs, US

Lafarge North America

michael.pelan@lafarge

- na.com

office: 816 941

- 1822

mobile: 913 558

- 4468
### §397. Advances by Government for completion of projects initiated prior to June 25, 1910

To enable the Secretary of the Interior to complete Government reclamation projects begun prior to June 25, 1910, the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized, as of June 25, 1910, upon request of the Secretary of the Interior, to transfer from time to time to the credit of the reclamation fund created by section 391 of this title, such sum or sums, not exceeding in the aggregate $20,000,000, as the Secretary of the Interior may deem necessary to complete the said reclamation projects, and such extensions thereof as he may deem proper and necessary to the successful and profitable operation and maintenance thereof or to protect water rights pertaining thereto claimed by the United States, provided the same shall be approved by the President of the United States; and such sum or sums as may be required to comply with the foregoing authority are appropriated, as of June 25, 1910, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated: Provided, That the sums authorized to be transferred to the reclamation fund shall be so transferred only as such sums shall be actually needed to meet payments for work performed under existing law: And provided further, That all sums so transferred shall be reimbursed to the Treasury from the reclamation fund, as hereinafter provided: And provided further, That no part of this appropriation shall be expended upon any project existing June 25, 1910, until it shall have been examined and reported upon by a board of engineer officers of the Army, designated by the President of the United States, and until it shall be approved by the President as feasible and practicable and worthy of such expenditure; nor shall any portion of this appropriation be expended upon any project initiated after June 25, 1910.

(June 25, 1910, ch. 407, §1, 36 Stat. 835.)