alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2168. Selection of presiding judge

(a) For cases in which the debtor is a territory, the Chief Justice of the United States shall designate a district court judge to sit by designation to conduct the case.

(b) For cases in which the debtor is not a territory, and no motion for joint administration of the debtor's case with the case of its affiliate territory has been filed or there is no case in which the affiliate territory is a debtor, the chief judge of the court of appeals for the circuit embracing the district in which the case is commenced shall designate a district court judge to conduct the case.

(Pub. L. 114–187, title III, §308, June 30, 2016, 130 Stat. 582.)
#### CAFÉ UNION v. REORDAN.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 18, 1903.)

1. Bills of Sale—Fraud—Evidence.

Where bills of sale of personal property by a debtor contained no schedule of the property conveyed, and had been executed for a consideration of $1 on the day an action had ripened into a judgment against the grantor, a finding that the bills were tainted with fraud was proper.

2. Executions—Release of Levy—Acts op Officers.

In an action against a city marshal for conversion of money accepted by him to release a levy, facts *held*to justify a judgment for defendant.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fourth District.

Action by the Café Union against John R. Reordan. From a Municipal Court judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and BISCHOFF and BLANCHARD, JJ.

Herbert J. Hindes, for appellant.

Marcus Helfand, for respondent.

BLANCHARD, J.

The defendant, having an execution against the property of one Lena Tragan, levied upon property which had formerly belonged to her, and which, at the time of the levy, plaintiff claimed by virtue of two assignments or bills of sale—one from Lena Tragan to Louis H. Steinhart, and the other from Steinhart to the plaintiff, a corporation of which Steinhart was president. These bills of sale have a taint about them, as no schedule "of the property conveyed is attached, and having been made for the consideration of $1, and on the day the action was begun which ripened into the judgment and execution pursuant to which levy was made. When the marshal made the levy, he found Lena Tragan in charge of the place, and apparently running it. Before the defendant had removed the property on which he had levied, Steinhart appeared upon the scene and placed two $50 bills upon a table. The defendant testifies that he was notified to take the $iooin place of taking out the stuff; that he did so, and released the levy. The plaintiff brought this action.for the alleged conversion of the $100 thus given to the defendant as marshal, and the trial court gave judgment for the defendant. Upon the law and the facts; we agree with the learned court below. The money *995was undoubtedly placed upon the table for the purpose of having the defendant accept it and release the levy upon the property seized, and that is what was done.

The judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Israel Moore, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on October 31, 1975, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel granted (see *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833). No opinion. Concur—Lupiano, J. P., Silverman, Evans, Lane and Sandler, JJ.
§ 599.407 Notification of Renewal Community designations. ( a ) *Notification of applicant.* HUD will notify each applicant of the designation of its nominated area as a Renewal Community.
( b ) *Federal Register publication.* In addition to any other form of notification, HUD will publish a notice of the designation of Renewal Communities in the Federal Register.
Berwyn Income Fund
                    Supplement
              Dated January 23, 1997
                 to the Prospectus
               Dated April 24, 1996





On January 21, 1997, the Board of Directors
decided to reopen the Fund.  Any investor who
wishes may now purchase shares in the fund by
following the procedures listed in the Prospectus.
                         
                         
                         
                         
                         
                         
                         
                         
                Berwyn Income Fund
                    Supplement
              Dated January 23, 1997
          to the Statement of Additional
                    Information
               Dated April 24, 1996





On January 21, 1997, the Board of Directors
decided to reopen the Fund.  Any investor who
wishes may now purchase shares in the fund by
following the procedures listed in the Prospectus.
§ 3280.9 Interpretative bulletins. Interpretative bulletins may be issued for the following purposes: ( a ) To clarify the meaning of the Standard; and
( b ) To assist in the enforcement of the Standard.
[58 FR 55003, Oct. 25, 1993]
Editorial Note on Part 5
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 5 appear at 65 FR 16715, Mar. 29, 2000.

§ 5.613 Public housing program and Section 8 tenant-based assistance program: PHA cooperation with welfare agency. ( a ) This section applies to the public housing program and the Section 8 tenant-based assistance program.
( b ) The PHA must make best efforts to enter into cooperation agreements with welfare agencies under which such agencies agree: ( 1 ) To target public assistance, benefits and services to families receiving assistance in the public housing program and the Section 8 tenant-based assistance program to achieve self-sufficiency;
( 2 ) To provide written verification to the PHA concerning welfare benefits for families applying for or receiving assistance in these housing assistance programs.
[65 FR 16717, Mar. 29, 2000]
### **CHAPTER 112—MERCHANT MARINER BENEFITS**

Sec.
11201.
Eligibility for veterans' burial and cemetery benefits.
11202.
Qualified service.
11203.
Documentation of qualified service.
11204.
Processing fees.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CB Richard Ellis Realty Trust (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Laurie E. Romanak, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/    LAURIE E.
ROMANAK                 
|Laurie E. Romanak Chief Financial
Officer

March 30, 2011
<Page>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 31


                                       CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth G. Carroll, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Liberty Satellite &
Technology, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the
registrant and I have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report based on such valuation; and

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
material affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  August 14, 2003

/s/ Kenneth G. Carroll
-------------------------------------
Kenneth G. Carroll
President and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 1228.2 Policy.

It shall be the policy of DOI to enter into cooperative agreements with States and Indian tribes to carry out audits and related investigations and enforcement actions whenever a State or tribe initiates a request to enter into an agreement and a finding is made that a State or tribe has the ability to carry out cooperative activities in a timely and efficient manner.
§ 92.550 Performance reviews. ( a ) *General.* HUD will review the performance of each participating jurisdiction in carrying out its responsibilities under this part whenever determined necessary by HUD, but at least annually. In conducting performance reviews, HUD will rely primarily on information obtained from the participating jurisdiction's and, as appropriate, the State recipient's records and reports, findings from on-site monitoring, audit reports, and information generated from the disbursement and information system established by HUD. Where applicable, HUD may also consider relevant information pertaining to a participating jurisdiction's or State recipient's performance gained from other sources, including citizen comments, complaint determinations, and litigation. Reviews to determine compliance with specific requirements of this part will be conducted as necessary, with or without prior notice to the participating jurisdiction or State recipient. Comprehensive performance reviews under the standards in paragraph (b) of this section will be conducted after prior notice to the participating jurisdiction.
( b ) *Standards for comprehensive performance review.* A participating jurisdiction's performance will be comprehensively reviewed periodically, as prescribed by HUD, to determine: ( 1 ) For local participating jurisdictions and State participating jurisdictions administering their own HOME programs, whether the participating jurisdiction has committed the HOME funds in the United States Treasury account as required by § 92.500 and expended the funds in the United States Treasury account as required by § 92.500, and has met the requirements of this part, particularly eligible activities, income targeting, affordability, and matching requirements; or
( 2 ) For State participating jurisdictions distributing HOME funds to State recipients, whether the State has met the matching contribution and other requirements of this part; has distributed the funds in accordance with the requirements of this part; and has made such reviews and audits of its State recipients as may be appropriate to determine whether they have satisfied the requirements of paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
MID-ATLANTIC COMMUNITY BANKGROUP, INC.
Exhibit (11)--Statement re: computation of per share earnings


                                                   Quarter Ended June 30,
                                                 1997                 1996
                                                 ----                 ----

PRIMARY

       Average shares outstanding                 944,333            944,333
       Net effect of dilutive stock
         options--based on the treasury
         stock method using average
         market price                              33,122             31,701
                                            -------------      -------------

       TOTAL                                      977,455            976,034
                                            =============       ============


       Net Income                              $  349,253        $   370,501
                                               ==========        ===========


       Per Share Amount                     $        0.36     $         0.38
                                            =============     ==============


FULLY DILUTED

       Average shares outstanding                 944,333            944,333
       Net effect of dilutive stock
         options--based on the treasury
         stock method using the year
         end market price, if higher
         than average market price                 33,122             32,705
                                            -------------     --------------

       TOTAL                                      977,455            977,038
                                             ============      =============


       Net Income                              $  349,253       $    370,501
                                               ==========       ============


       Per Share Amount                    $         0.36    $          0.38
                                           ==============    ===============


                                       20
December 21,2014 

### REF: Case No. 2014WP230019, Starjet, Inc. FAA NaomiTsuda Regional Counsel, Western-Pacific Region Dear Ms. Tsuda: 

# RECEIVED JAN 05 2015 

## HEARING DOCKET 

# dO\'-\

We are only now in receipt ofyourletter dated December 10, 2014 -we did notreceive tbe earlier correspondence regarding tbis matter. Having said tbat, we are requesting a hearing on tbe matter in question. Please advise when/where to appear for tbe sarue. Thankyou in advance, andhave a great holiday season and a wonderful NewYear. 

# a ely, 

### 7

-"7_.----._
___ _ PekkaKaru President / Director ofOperations Starjet, Inc. Air CarrierJSGA460L

26 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD, 2ND FLOOR • MARINA DEL REV o CA 90292 • TEL: (310) 301-9325 e (310) 301-1556 • WWW.STARJETINC.COM
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3085 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3085

 To amend the National Trails System Act to update the feasibility and 
 suitability study originally prepared for the Trail of Tears National 
  Historic Trail and provide for the inclusion of new trail segments, 
 land components, and campgrounds associated with that trail, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 28, 2005

  Mr. Wamp (for himself, Mr. Berry, Mr. Taylor of North Carolina, Mr. 
   Boren, Mr. Aderholt, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Whitfield, Mrs. Emerson, Mr. 
Snyder, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Deal of Georgia, Mr. Gingrey, Mr. Duncan, Mr. 
Davis of Tennessee, Mr. Tanner, Mr. Ford, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Lucas, and 
Mr. Cole of Oklahoma) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                     to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the National Trails System Act to update the feasibility and 
 suitability study originally prepared for the Trail of Tears National 
  Historic Trail and provide for the inclusion of new trail segments, 
 land components, and campgrounds associated with that trail, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REVISION OF FEASIBILITY AND SUITABILITY STUDY OF TRAIL OF 
              TEARS NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL.

    Section 5(a)(16) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 
1244(a)(16)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``subsections'' and 
        inserting ``sections''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
    ``(C) Not later than one complete fiscal year after the date of the 
enactment of this subparagraph, the Secretary of the Interior shall 
submit to Congress a study regarding the feasibility and suitability of 
designating, as additional components of the Trail of Tears National 
Historic Trail, the Benge and Bell routes, the land components of the 
designated water routes in Tennessee, Alabama, Arkansas, and Oklahoma, 
the routes from the collection forts in Alabama, Georgia, North 
Carolina, and Tennessee to the emigration depots, and related 
campgrounds located along such routes and in such land components, by 
which the Cherokee Nation was removed to Oklahoma. Upon completion of 
the study, if the Secretary determines that such routes, land 
components, and campgrounds are a feasible and suitable addition to the 
Trail of Tears National Historic Trail, the Secretary shall designate 
such routes, land components, and campgrounds as components of the 
Trail of Tears National Historic Trail. The Secretary shall publish 
notice of the designation in the Federal Register.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Computerized Thermal
Imaging, Inc., (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Richard V. Secord, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Richard V. Secord
-------------------------------
Richard V. Secord
Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer

Date:  November 15, 2004
### §80501. Definitions

In this chapter:

(1) Container.—The term "container" has the meaning given that term in the Convention.

(2) Convention.—The term "Convention" means the International Convention for Safe Containers, and its annexes, done at Geneva, Switzerland, December 2, 1972.

(3) International transport.—The term "international transport" means the transportation of a container between—

(A) a place in a foreign country and a place in the jurisdiction of the United States; or

(B) two places outside the United States by United States carriers.

(4) Owner.—The term "owner" includes the lessee or bailee of a container if a written lease or bailment provides for the lessee or bailee to exercise the owner's responsibility for maintaining and examining the container.

(5) Safety approval plate.—The term "safety approval plate" has the meaning given that term in annex I of the Convention.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §11, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1694.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 80501 | 46 App.:1501. | Pub. L. 95–208, §2, Dec. 13, 1977, 91 Stat. 1475. |

Section

In the definition of "international transport", subparagraphs (A) and (B) are substituted for 46 App. U.S.C. 1501(d)(1)–(3) to eliminate unnecessary words.

In the definition of "owner", the words "includes the lessee or bailee of a container if a written lease or bailment provides for the lessee or bailee to exercise the owner's responsibility for maintaining and examining the container" are substituted for "means a person who owns a container, or, if a written lease or bailment provides for the lessee or bailee to exercise the owner's responsibility for maintaining and examining the container, the lessee or bailee of a container, to the extent such agreement so provides" to eliminate unnecessary words.

The definition of "Secretary" is omitted because a complete reference to the appropriate Secretary is used the first time the Secretary is named in each section. Throughout this chapter, the phrase "Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating" is substituted for "Secretary of Transportation" because the Coast Guard has been transferred to the Department of Homeland Security (except when operating as a service in the Navy) by section 888 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107–296, 116 Stat. 2249).

The definition of "United States" is omitted because "United States" is defined in chapter 1 of the revised title. The definitions of "new container" and "existing container" are omitted as obsolete.