alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 10.26**

 

**New York Community Bancorp, Inc.**

**615 Merrick Avenue**

**Westbury, New York 11590**

 

June 27, 2003 

 

Mary Ellen McKinley 

The Roslyn Savings Bank 

One Jericho Plaza 

Jericho, New York 11753-8905 

 

Dear Mary Ellen: 

 

I am pleased to have this opportunity to set forth in writing certainadditional information relating to your employment at New York Community Bank (the “Bank”) following the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) entered betweenNew York Community Bancorp, Inc. (the “Holding Company”) and Roslyn Bancorp, Inc. on this date. This letter is intended to supplement your new employment agreement with the Holding Company. 

 

At such time as you become an employee of the Bank under your new employmentagreement as a result of the merger contemplated by the Merger Agreement, you will receive a retention bonus of $500,000. However, if you voluntarily terminate employment prior to the completion of 365 days of employment after the Effective Timeother than by reason of an “Event of Termination” (as defined in your new employment agreement), or if you are terminated for “Just Cause” (as defined in your new employment agreement) within such 365-day period, you willimmediately return to the Holding Company a portion of the retention bonus equal to the product of (x) the retention bonus and (y) a fraction the numerator of which is the total number of days remaining in such 365-day period and the denominator ofwhich is 365. 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Merger Agreement is terminated pursuant to Article VI of the MergerAgreement, this letter agreement will be null and void. 

 

Pleaseacknowledge the foregoing in the space indicated below. 

 
    
Sincerely,
      
/s/ Joseph R. Ficalora
      
Joseph R. Ficalora
      
President and Chief Executive Officer

Acknowledged and Agreed:
    
/s/ Mary Ellen McKinley
    
Mary Ellen McKinley
    
 

2
#### HAAN v. FOX.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 17, 1905.)

Action by Rudolph M. Haan against Sarah E. Fox. No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs.
§ 9b.1 Press access to the Department of State. ( a ) Media correspondents without valid Department of State press building passes shall have access to the Main State building identical to that enjoyed by members of the public.
( b ) Media correspondents holding valid Department of State press building passes: ( 1 ) May enter and have access 24 hours a day, during regular working hours, outside regular working hours, on weekends and on holidays, without an appointment, to the reception area of the Diplomatic Lobby, C Street Mezzanine area, press booths (Room 2310), press briefing room (Room 2118), and when in operation, the Office of Press Relations (Room 2109).
( 2 ) May enter and have access without an appointment, on the basement level or on the first and second floors, to the cafeteria, post office, banks, concessionaries, barber shop, dry cleaners and the Foreign Affairs Recreation Association offices for the purposes for which they are established and when they are in operation.
( 3 ) May not escort non-passholders into the Department of State building.
( c ) Media correspondents, with or without a Department of State press building pass, may enter areas above the second floor of the Main State building only if the correspondent is invited by a Department employee to attend a specific social or official function in an office located above the second floor. Permission to enter areas above the second floor is strictly limited to direct passage to and from the appointment location of the Department of State employee, or the office or reception room where the function takes place.
( d ) Possession of State Department press building pass does not confer access to or other privileges at other Federal buildings. It is not to be construed as official United States Government recognition, approval or accreditation of a correspondent.
[54 FR 1686, Jan. 17, 1989]
§ 1218.42 Cross-lease netting in calculation of late-payment interest. ( a ) Interest due from a payor on any underpayment for any Federal mineral lease or leases (onshore or offshore) and on any Indian tribal mineral lease or leases for any production month shall not be reduced by offsetting against that underpayment any overpayment made by the payor on any other lease or leases, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section. Interest due from a payor or any underpayment on any Indian allotted lease shall not be reduced by offsetting against any overpayment on any other Indian allotted lease under any circumstances.
( b ) Royalties attributed to production from a lease or leases which should have been attributed to production from a different lease or leases may be offset to determine whether and to what extent an underpayment exists on which interest is due if the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The error results from attributing and reporting an equal volume of production, produced from a lease or leases during a particular production month, to a different lease or leases from which it was not produced for the same or another production month;
( 2 ) The payor is the same for the lease or leases to which production was attributed and the lease or leases to which it should have been attributed;
( 3 ) The payor submits production reports, pipeline allocation reports, or other similar documentary evidence pertaining to the specific production involved which verifies the correct production information;
( 4 ) The lessor is the same for the leases involved (in the case of Indian tribal leases, the same tribe is the lessor); and
( 5 ) The ultimate recipients of any royalty or other lease revenues under any applicable permanent indefinite appropriations are the same for, and receive the same percentage of revenue from, the leases.
( c ) If ONRR assesses late-payment interest and the payor asserts that some or all of the interest assessed is not owed pursuant to the exception set forth in paragraph (b) of this section, the burden is on the payor to demonstrate that the exception applies in the specific circumstances of the case.
( d ) The exception set forth in paragraph (b) of this section shall not operate to relieve any payor of liability imposed by statute or regulation for erroneous reporting.
[57 FR 62206, Dec. 30, 1992]
#### § 232.605 Contract requirements.

The contract between the mortgagor and the general contractor may be in the form of a lump sum contract, a cost plus contract, or different or alternative forms of contract specified by the Commissioner.

[80 FR 48028, Aug. 11, 2015]
steam_record - Fwd: 

 

>>> <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> 6/23/2010 12:26 PM >>> 

FYI - Second one for RRI! 

----- Forwarded by Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US on 06/23/2010 12:26 PM 

----- 

 

 From: "Griffin, J Daniel (Dan)" <JDGriffin@rrienergy.com> 

 To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Cc: "Ethridge Jr., Benjamin" <BEthridge@rrienergy.com>, "Baldi, Sara Marie" 

<SMBaldi@rrienergy.com> 

 Date: 06/23/2010 12:24 PM 

 Subject: 

Dear Ms. AliceaPlease find attached a letter from Benjamin Ethridge, General Manager of 

RRI Energy's Cheswick Generation Station. 

Sincerely, 

J. Daniel Griffin 

724-275-1501 Office 

724-323-4624 Cell(See attached file: Steam Electric ELG 

Questionaire.pdf) 

From: Deborah Bartram

To: steam_record

Date: 6/29/2010 6:12 PM

Subject: Fwd: 

Attachments: Steam Electric ELG Questionaire.pdf

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C2A37AADO... 3/1/2011
## R e q u e s t f

o r I n f o r m a t i o n

­ F A

A

­ 2 0 1 5

­ 1 8 7 9

9

­ A W A

­ A V S

­ 3 3 3 E x e m p t i o n s ( F A

A )

S e n t : T u e s d a y

, J u l y 2 8

, 2 0 1 5 1 0 : 2 3 A M

T o : j a k e m s h e a l y @ g m a i l

. c o m

D e a r M r

. S h e a l y :

T h i s l e t t e r i s t o i n f o r m y o u t h a t t h e f

o l l o w i n g i n f

o r m a t i o n i s m i s s i n g f r o m y

o u r p e t i t i o n ( D o c k

e t N o

. F A A

­ 2 0 1 5

­ 1 8 7 9 )

. T h i s i n f o r m a t i o n i s n e c e s s a r y f

o r t h e F e d e r a l A v i a t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ( F A A ) t o p r o c e s s y o u r p e t i t i o n

.

P r o v i d e a c o p y o f t h e M o t i o n P i c t u r e a n d T e l e v i s i o n O p e r a t i o n s M a n u a l ( M P T O M ) w h i c h i s r e q u i r e d b y O r d e r

8 9 0 0

. 1

, V o l u m e 3

, C h a p t e r 8

, S e c t i o n 1

. I f y o u w i s h f o r u s t o p r o c e e d w i t h o u t t h i s m a n u a l a n d r e m o v e

c l o s e d

‐ s e t f i l m i n g f r o m y

o u r p r o p o s e d o p e r a t i o n p l e a s e i n f o r m o f u s o f y

o u r i n t e n t i o n b y t h e r e q u e s t e d

r e s p o n s e d a t e l i s t e d b e l o w

.

P l e a s e s u b m i t t h e a d d i t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n ( n o n

‐ p r o p r i e t a r y ) t o y o u r d o c k e t a t w w w

. r e g u l a t i o n s

. g o v a n d s u b m i t a n y

p r o p r i e t a r y i n f

o r m a t i o n t o t h e F A A H e a d q u a r t e r s o r e l e c t r o n i c a l l y v i a e m a i l t o 3 3 3 e x e m p t i o n s @ f a a

. g o v

. I f y

o u w a n t

u s t o p r o c e s s y

o u r r e q u e s t a n y f u r t h e r

, w e m u s t r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n d e s c r i b e d a b o v

e b y 8 / 1 1 / 1 5

. I f w e d o n o t

r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n

, w e w i l l c l o s e t h e d o c k e t w i t h o u t n o t i f

y i n g y o u f u r t h e r

.

I f y o u h a v e a n y q u e s t i o n s

, p l e a s e f

e e l f r e e t o c o n t a c t m e a t ( 2 0 2 ) 2 6 7

­ 4 2 6 4

.

S i n c e r e l y

,

D a n N g o

F A A O f f i c e o f R u l e m a k i n g
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3387 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain work footwear. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 21, 2005 

Mr. RYUN of Kansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain work footwear. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN WORK FOOTWEAR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.64.10 Work footwear with outer 

soles of rubber, plastics, 

leather or composition leather and uppers of leather, not 

covering the ankle (provided 

for in subheading 

6403.99.60 or 6403.99.90) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 
2 

•HR 3387 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### State Division of Human Rights, Respondent, v Dunkirk Public School System, Petitioner.

Petition granted, determination and order of appeal board unanimously annulled, without costs, and that of the State division reinstated and confirmed. Memorandum: Complainant filed with the State Division of Human Rights a complaint against petitioner herein, alleging that it engaged in unlawful discriminatory practice against her by reason of her age when it passed over her application for a full-time teaching position and employed four other teachers who are younger than complainant. Complainant had taught as a substitute teacher in petitioner’s school system. The division conducted an extensive investigatory hearing, extending for more than five hours. It heard many witnesses, several of whom were examined by complainant, and complainant also testified. The application of complainant and the four applications were received in evidence; and considerable evidence was received concerning complainant’s teaching ability and temperament, some of which was favorable and much of which was unfavorable to her. Based upon substantial evidence the *1154division determined that there was no probable cause for the complaint, and dismissed it. On complainant’s appeal to the respondent appeal board, the latter found that there was probable cause for the complaint, reversed the determination of the division and remitted the complaint to the division for further proceedings in accordance with the Human Rights Law. Only where there is no substantial evidence to support the division’s determination may the appeal board reverse that factual determination. Since the division made a thorough investigation of this complaint and upon substantial evidence found no probable cause for it and dismissed it, the appeal board had no jurisdiction to reverse that determination. The petitioner’s motion to annul that determination is, therefore, granted and the determination of the division is confirmed *(State Div. of Human Rights v New York State Drug Abuse Control Comm.,*59 AD2d 332; *State Div. of Human Rights v Merchants Mut. Ins. Co.,*59 AD2d 1054). (Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law, § 298.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Dillon, Hancock, Jr., Denman and Witmer, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 982
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999, and at 89 FR 38293, May 7, 2024.

§ 982.156 Depositary for program funds. ( a ) Unless otherwise required or permitted by HUD, all program receipts must be promptly deposited with a financial institution selected as depositary by the PHA in accordance with HUD requirements.
( b ) The PHA may only withdraw deposited program receipts for use in connection with the program in accordance with HUD requirements.
( c ) The PHA must enter into an agreement with the depositary in the form required by HUD.
( d ) ( 1 ) If required under a written freeze notice from HUD to the depositary: ( i ) The depositary may not permit any withdrawal by the PHA of funds held under the depositary agreement unless expressly authorized by written notice from HUD to the depositary; and
( ii ) The depositary must permit withdrawals of such funds by HUD.
( 2 ) HUD must send the PHA a copy of the freeze notice from HUD to the depositary.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2577-0169) [60 FR 34695, July 3, 1995, as amended at 60 FR 45661, Sept. 1, 1995]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,352
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,182
<ALLOWANCES>                                       220
<INVENTORY>                                      6,171
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,363
<PP&E>                                          87,428
<DEPRECIATION>                                  38,545
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 280,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,136
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           30,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           128
<OTHER-SE>                                     176,193
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   280,071
<SALES>                                         62,386
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,788
<CGS>                                           37,194
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,015
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,626
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,743
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,746
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,749
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,997
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,997
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 5
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 5 appear at 65 FR 16715, Mar. 29, 2000.

§ 5.855 When am I specifically authorized to prohibit admission of individuals who have engaged in criminal activity? ( a ) You may prohibit admission of a household to federally assisted housing under your standards if you determine that any household member is currently engaging in, or has engaged in during a reasonable time before the admission decision: ( 1 ) Drug-related criminal activity;
( 2 ) Violent criminal activity;
( 3 ) Other criminal activity that would threaten the health, safety, or right to peaceful enjoyment of the premises by other residents; or
( 4 ) Other criminal activity that would threaten the health or safety of the PHA or owner or any employee, contractor, subcontractor or agent of the PHA or owner who is involved in the housing operations.
( b ) You may establish a period before the admission decision during which an applicant must not have engaged in the activities specified in paragraph (a) of this section (*reasonable time*).
( c ) If you previously denied admission to an applicant because of a determination concerning a member of the household under paragraph (a) of this section, you may reconsider the applicant if you have sufficient evidence that the members of the household are not currently engaged in, and have not engaged in, such criminal activity during a reasonable period, determined by you, before the admission decision. ( 1 ) You would have *sufficient evidence* if the household member submitted a certification that she or he is not currently engaged in and has not engaged in such criminal activity during the specified period and provided supporting information from such sources as a probation officer, a landlord, neighbors, social service agency workers and criminal records, which you verified. (See subpart J of this part for one method of checking criminal records.)
( 2 ) For purposes of this section, a household member is *currently engaged in* the criminal activity if the person has engaged in the behavior recently enough to justify a reasonable belief that the behavior is current.
§ 983.204 Execution of HAP Contract or PHA-owned Certification. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 38325 , May 7, 2024.
( a ) *PHA inspection of housing.* Before execution of the HAP contract, the PHA must determine that applicable pre-HAP contract HQS requirements have been met in accordance with § 983.103(b) or (c) as applicable. The PHA may not execute the HAP contract for any contract unit that does not meet the pre-HAP contract HQS requirements, except as provided in paragraph (c).
( b ) *Existing housing.* For existing housing, the HAP contract must be executed and effective promptly after PHA selection of the owner proposal and PHA determination that the applicable pre-HAP contract HQS requirements have been met.
( c ) *Newly constructed or rehabilitated housing.* For newly constructed or rehabilitated housing developed pursuant to § 983.152(a)(1) which will not undergo development activity after HAP contract execution per § 983.157, the HAP contract must be executed and effective promptly after the PHA determines that the housing was completed in accordance with the applicable requirements, HUD's HQS, and any additional design, architecture, or quality requirements specified by the PHA, in accordance with § 983.156(b)(1) or (c). For rehabilitated housing that will undergo development activity after HAP contract execution per § 983.157, the HAP contract must be executed and effective promptly after the requirements of § 983.157(c) are met (all proposed PBV units are added to the contract at this time, including units that do not comply with HQS or that will undergo development activity).
( d ) *Effective date of the PBV HAP contract.* The effective date of the HAP contract must be on or after the date the HAP contract is executed. The HAP contract must be effective before the effective date of the first lease covering a contract unit occupied by an assisted family, and the PHA may not pay any housing assistance payment to the owner until the HAP contract is effective.
[89 FR 38324, May 7, 2024]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3484 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3484

     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain athletic footwear.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2005

Mr. Ryun of Kansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain athletic footwear.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ATHLETIC FOOTWEAR.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.64.21      Men's tennis        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         shoes, basketball                                                  31/2009
                         shoes, gym shoes,
                         training shoes,
                         and the like,
                         with pigskin
                         uppers and outer
                         soles of rubber,
                         plastics,
                         leather, or
                         composition
                         leather (provided
                         for in subheading
                         6403.99.60) and
                         women's tennis
                         shoes, basketball
                         shoes, gym shoes,
                         training shoes,
                         and the like,
                         with pigskin
                         uppers and outer
                         soles of rubber,
                         plastics,
                         leather, or
                         composition
                         leather, valued
                         over $2.50 per
                         pair (provided
                         for in subheading
                         6403.99.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```