alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3486

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain footwear for men. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 27, 2005

Mr. RYUN of Kansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain footwear for 

men.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN FOOTWEAR FOR MEN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.64.17 Other footwear with uppers 

of vegetable fibers, for men 

(provided for in subheading 

6405.20.30) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 
2

•HR 3486 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
§ 884.125 Broadband infrastructure. Any new construction or substantial rehabilitation, as substantial rehabilitation is defined by 24 CFR 5.100, of a building with more than 4 rental units and that is subject to a Housing Assistance Payments contract executed or renewed after January 19, 2017 must include installation of broadband infrastructure, as this term is also defined in 24 CFR 5.100, except where the owner determines and documents the determination that: ( a ) The location of the new construction or substantial rehabilitation makes installation of broadband infrastructure infeasible;
( b ) The cost of installing broadband infrastructure would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of its program or activity or in an undue financial burden; or
( c ) The structure of the housing to be substantially rehabilitated makes installation of broadband infrastructure infeasible.
[81 FR 92638, Dec. 20, 2016]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited balance sheets and unaudited statements of earnings found on pages 3
and 4 of the Company's Form 10-QSB for the year to date, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         453,460
<SECURITIES>                                     2,188
<RECEIVABLES>                                  360,018
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               845,233
<PP&E>                                         384,776
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,571,335
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,290,307
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           468
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,800,585
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,571,335
<SALES>                                        902,969
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               924,305
<CGS>                                          507,725
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  507,725
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                86,657
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              47,123
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                349,301
<INCOME-TAX>                                    90,819
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            258,482
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   258,482
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 982

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999, and at 89 FR 38293, May 7, 2024.

#### § 982.607 Congregate housing: Lease and HAP contract.

For congregate housing, there is a separate lease and HAP contract for each assisted family.
EX-10.3


   

  Exhibit 10.3

  LM FUNDING AMERICA, INC.
STOCK OPTION CANCELLATION AGREEMENT

  THIS STOCK OPTION CANCELLATION AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”), is made effective as of November 18, 2022, between LM Funding America, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and ________ (the “Employee”).

  WHEREAS, the Employee believes that it is in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders to voluntarily cancel the existing Company stock option held by Employee set forth on Exhibit A hereto (the “Cancelled Option”) that has relatively low incentive or retention value at this time so that additional shares can become available for grant in the future under the Company’s 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which the Company may use for future equity grants to Company personnel in order to recruit, retain and motivate such personnel; and  

  WHEREAS, the Company is relying on the Employee’s surrender and cancellation of the Cancelled Option in making administrative determinations regarding the Plan.

  NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows:

  1.Cancellation of Outstanding Option.  The Employee hereby surrenders the Cancelled Option for cancellation, and the Company hereby accepts such surrender and cancellation. By execution of this Agreement, the parties have taken all steps necessary to cancel the Cancelled Option.   


  2.No Expectation or Obligation.  The Company and Employee acknowledge and agree that the surrender and cancellation of the Cancelled Option described herein shall be without any expectation of the Employee to receive, and without imposing any obligation on the Company to pay or grant, any cash, equity awards or other consideration presently or in the future in regard to the cancellation of the Cancelled Option.


  3.Reliance.  The Employee acknowledges and agrees that the Company is relying on the provisions of Section 1 and 2 herein in connection with administration of the Plan, including without limitation determinations regarding the nature of future grants under the Plan.


  4.Miscellaneous.  This Agreement contains all of the understanding between the Company and Employee concerning the cancellation of the option. The Company and Employee have made no promises, agreements, conditions, or understanding relating to this subject matter, either orally or in writing, that are not included in this Agreement. This Agreement may be executed in counterparty, each of which when signed by the Company and Employee will be deemed an original and all of which together will be deemed the dame agreement. This Agreement shall be governed and construed exclusively in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware applicable. 


   

  [Signature Page Follows]

   

   

  

   

  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement, effective as of the date first set forth above.

  LM FUNDING AMERICA, INC.

  By:  	

  Name:  

  Title:  

   

  Agreed and acknowledged as
of the date set forth below:  

  						 

  Name of Employee

   

   

   

  

   

  Exhibit A

   

  Description of Cancelled Option

   

  				
	Name
	Grant Date
	Number of Option Shares 
	Exercise Price
§ 1227.101 What royalty management functions may ONRR delegate to a State? ( a ) If there are oil and gas leases subject to the Act on Federal lands within your State, ONRR may delegate the following royalty management functions for all such Federal oil and gas leases to you under this part: ( 1 ) Receiving and processing production or royalty reports;
( 2 ) Correcting erroneous report data; and
( 3 ) Performing automated verification.
( b ) If there are oil and gas leases subject to the Act on Federal lands within your State, ONRR may delegate the following royalty management functions for some or all of the Federal oil and gas leases to you under this part: ( 1 ) Conducting audits and investigations; and
( 2 ) Issuing demands, subpoenas, and orders to perform restructured accounting, including related notices to lessees or their designees, and entering into tolling agreements under section 115(d)(1) of the Act, 30 U.S.C. 1725(d)(1).
( c ) If there are oil and gas leases offshore of your State subject to section 8(g) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, 43 U.S.C. 1337 (g), or solid mineral leases or geothermal leases on Federal lands within your State, ONRR may delegate authority to conduct audits and investigations for some or all such Federal leases.
[64 FR 36784, July 8, 1999, as amended at 75 FR 61087, Oct. 4, 2010]]
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
DreamWorks Animation SKG, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned
officers of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                                                       
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 26, 2008 |  | /s/    JEFFREY
KATZENBERG                             
|                         |  | Jeffrey Katzenberg Chief Executive Officer            
|                         | 
|Dated: February 26, 2008 |  | /s/    LEWIS W.
COLEMAN                               
|                         |  | Lewis W. Coleman President and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 1229.125 Preparation and issuance of enforcement documents. ( a ) Determinations of additional royalties due resulting from audit activities conducted under a delegation of authority must be formally communicated by the State, to the companies or other payors by an issue letter prior to any enforcement action. The issue letter will serve to ensure that all audit findings are accurate and complete by obtaining advance comments from officials of the companies or payors audited. Issue letters must be prepared in a format specified by the ONRR, and transmitted to the company or payor. The company or payor shall be given 30 days from receipt of the letter to respond to the State on the findings contained in the letter.
( b ) After evaluating the company or payor's response to the issue letter, the State shall draft a demand letter which will be submitted with supporting workpaper files to the ONRR for appropriate enforcement action. Any substantive revisions to the demand letter will be discussed with the State prior to issuance of the letter. Copies of all enforcement action documents shall be provided to the State by ONRR upon their issuance to the company or payor.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Company's
financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,591
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  814,726
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    752,888
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,697,111
<PP&E>                                         336,849
<DEPRECIATION>                                 118,502
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,173,620
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,198,484
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,000
<COMMON>                                         4,273
<OTHER-SE>                                     835,891
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                      3,363,654
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,363,654
<CGS>                                        1,525,111
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,525,111
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,828,148
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              48,743
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (31,600)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (31,600)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (31,600)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.01)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 99.14



                   TURBODYNE SETTLES WITH ASENSIO & CO., INC.


CARPINTERIA, CA - MARCH 21, 2000 - Turbodyne Technologies Inc.'s (EASDAQ:TRBD)
CEO Gerhard Delf announced today that Turbodyne has settled its lawsuit against
Manuel Asensio and Asensio & Company, Inc.

Turbodyne filed suit against Asensio on December 16, 1998 in Los Angeles County
Superior Court. As part of the settlement agreement, Asensio & Co., Inc. agreed
to issue the following press release:


On August 4, 1998 Asensio & Company, Inc. announced that it had initiated
research coverage of shares of Turbodyne Technologies, Inc.'s common stock.
Following the initiation of coverage, trading was halted by NASDAQ and EASDAQ.
Turbodyne was directed to release complete and accurate information on certain
contracts and agreements and to take steps to ensure that future press releases
are timely, complete and accurate.

Between June and October of 1999, Turbodyne made a series of management changes,
including the resignation of certain members of its Board of Directors and the
appointment of new members. Turbodyne has announced that its new management
included certain individuals who have significant educational and work
experience in the automotive industry.

Asensio & Company, Inc. has not conducted any significant research or due
diligence on Turbodyne's product development efforts or the market potential of
its products in over a year. However, while Turbodyne did not invent the
electrically assisted turbocharger, it has developed and patented what it
contends are key technologies for the electrically assisted turbocharger.

Turbodyne and Asensio have fully and completely resolved all claims and issues
between them.


Turbodyne Technologies Inc., a California based high technology company,
specializes in the development of charging technology for internal combustion
engines plus the development and manufacturing of high-tech assemblies for
electrically assisted turbochargers and superchargers. Turbodyne Technologies
Inc.'s headquarters is located in Carpinteria, CA; the European business
location is Frankfurt, Germany. Additional information about the company is
available on the Internet at http://www.turbodyne.com.

Contacts:

Corporate Communications, Peter Weichselbraun (800) 566-1130
VP Group Finance - Investor Relations, Ken Fitzpatrick (800) 566-1130
European Investor Relations, Markus Kumbrink +49-69-975-44-665
### Surficial geology of the central Kobuk River valley, northwestern Alaska

By: A.T. Fernald

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1181K

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (4215 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (4616 pdf)                        
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### Control Strategies: Background and Overview

Summary and Organization

This section of the TSD describes the consideration of possible control measures and their inclusion or elimination from consideration as part of the overall control strategies in the various SIPs supported by the modeled attainment demonstrations.

A basic description of the process to be employed is followed by four sections, each addressing one of the fundamental sectors of the emissions inventories (area sources, large stationary point sources, off-road mobile sources, and on-road mobile sources).

Requirements

Section 172 of the CAA requires that each attainment plan “provide for the implementation of all reasonably available control measures as expeditiously as practicable (including such reductions in emissions from existing sources in the area as may be obtained through the adoption, at a minimum, of reasonably available control technology), and shall provide for attainment of the NAAQS”

EPA interprets RACM as referring to measures of any type that may be applicable to a wide range of sources (mobile, area, or stationary), whereas RACT refers to measures applicable to stationary sources. Thus, RACT is a type of RACM specifically designed for stationary sources.

RACT would be determined as part of the broader RACM analysis, and identification of all measures (for stationary, mobile, and area sources) that are technically and economically feasible.

In general, the combined approach to RACT and RACM includes the following steps:

o identification of potential measures that are reasonable

o modeling to assess attainment by the attainment date

o selection of RACT and RACM

Section 172 does not include any specific applicability thresholds to identify the size of sources that States and EPA must consider in the RACT and RACM analysis.

For each technologically feasible control technology or measure, the State should provide the following information:

o control efficiency, by pollutant (PM2.5, SO 2 , NO X , VOC)

o possible emission reductions by pollutanto estimated $/ton reduced

o date by which the measure could be reasonably implemented

The cost effectiveness of a technology is expressed as its annualized cost divided by the emissions reduced per year ($/ton.) When making a determination as to whether an available control technology or measure is economically feasible, there are certain factors that should be taken into consideration. Similar sources may have different marginal costs, profit margins and abilities to pass costs through to the consumer. These factors are appropriate to consider.

Seasonal controls are acceptable, in situations such as Utah’s, where PM and Ozone violations occur in winter and summer respectively.

Source Categories

In examining emission controls, it is helpful to categorize the sources of those emissions into the same basic groupings used in the compiling the emissions inventories: stationary point sources, area sources, non-road mobile sources, and on-road mobile sources. Each is discussed in turn.