alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1632. Repealed. Pub. L. 90–496, §14, Aug. 23, 1968, 82 Stat. 842

Section, act July 22, 1954, ch. 558, §19, 68 Stat. 505, authorized Comptroller General of United States to review annually the office and activities of Government Comptroller of Virgin Islands, and report thereon to Governor, Secretary of the Interior, and Congress.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 90–496, §14, Aug. 23, 1968, 82 Stat. 842, provided that the repeal of this section is effective on the date of enactment of Pub. L. 90–496, which was approved Aug. 23, 1968.
#### Donna M. Hughes, Respondent, v Paul F. Farrey, Appellant.

[832 NYS2d 806]

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold B. Beeler, J.), entered on or about January 26, 2006, which granted plaintiffs motion to compel discovery, including defendant’s deposition, and denied defendant’s cross motion for a protective order and a stay of all proceedings, unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs.

Defendant husband has since been deposed, and a trial on damages has already been held based on a grant of partial summary judgment to plaintiff wife on her negligence claim *(see*30 AD3d 244 [2006], *Iv dismissed*8 NY3d 841 [2007]), rendering this appeal moot. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Buckley, Gonzalez and Malone, JJ.
|   | (a) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/     FRANK V. RIOLO    |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Chief Executive Officer of                         |
|   | American Casino & Entertainment Properties LLC |

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Wise Metals Group LLC (the Company) for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kenneth Stastny, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 29, 2009



By:

/s/ Kenneth StastnyKenneth StastnyChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
### [§§3901, 3902. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–171, title X, §10418(a)(20), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 508]

Section 3901, Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 528, related to regulations for accommodations for export animals.

Section 3902, Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 528, related to penalties.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to**

**Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Héctor Alonso, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IMPSAT Fiber Networks, Inc. (the “Registrant”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared,

 

(b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of ReleaseNo. 33-8283 (June 5, 2003)], 

 

(c) evaluated theeffectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation, and 

 

(d) disclosed in this report any changein the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) all adversely significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to affect the Registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
#### § 966.50 Purpose and scope.

The purpose of this subpart is to set forth the requirements, standards and criteria for a grievance procedure to be established and implemented by public housing agencies (PHAs) to assure that a PHA tenant is afforded an opportunity for a hearing if the tenant disputes within a reasonable time any PHA action or failure to act involving the tenant's lease with the PHA or PHA regulations which adversely affect the individual tenant's rights, duties, welfare or status.

[56 FR 51579, Oct. 11, 1991]
### SUBCHAPTER II—PALAU
§ 884.104 Maximum total annual contract commitment and project account (private-owner or PHA-owner projects). ( a ) *Maximum total annual contract commitment.* The maximum total annual housing assistance payments that may be committed under the Contract shall be the total of the Gross Rents for all the Contract units in the project.
( b ) *Project account.* In order to assure that housing assistance payments will be increased on a timely basis to cover increases in Contract Rents or decreases in Family Incomes: ( 1 ) A Project Account shall be established and maintained in an amount as determined by the Secretary consistent with his responsibilities under Section 8(c)(6) of the Act, out of amounts by which the maximum annual Contract commitment per year exceeds amounts paid under the Contract for any year. This account shall be established and maintained by HUD as a specifically identified and segregated account, and payment shall be made therefrom only for the purposes of ( i ) housing assistance payments, and
( ii ) other costs specifically authorized or approved by the Secretary.
( 2 ) Whenever a HUD-approved estimate of required housing assistance payments for a fiscal year exceeds the maximum annual Contract commitment, and would cause the amount in the Project Account to be less than an amount equal to 40 percent of such maximum annual Contract commitment, HUD shall, within a reasonable period of time, take such additional steps authorized by Section 8(c)(6) of the Act as may be necessary to carry out this assurance, including (as provided in that section of the Act) “the reservation of annual contributions authority for the purpose of amending housing assistance contracts or the allocation of a portion of new authorizations for the purpose of amending housing assistance contracts.”
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of IMPSAT Fiber Networks on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Héctor Alonso, Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the
registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date: November 15, 2004



/s/ Héctor AlonsoHéctor AlonsoChief Financial Officer




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ANITA HUNTER, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CITIBANK, N.A., et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 09-cv-02079-JCS 

ORDER VACATING HEARING ON 

MOTION FOR INSTRUCTIONS AND 

MODIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT 

AGREEMENT 

Re: Dkt. No. 629 

In 2012, the Court approved a final settlement in this class action. Since that time, 

according to class counsel, over $120 million have been collected and distributed pursuant to the 

settlement agreement. Presently before the Court is a motion seeking: 1) instructions regarding 

the distribution of settlement funds as to certain claimants (Sam L. Braswell, Steven Schoenfeld 

and Sandra Stroud, hereinafter “Claimants”) who apparently assigned their claims in a related 

bankruptcy proceeding to ASM Capital; and 2) modification of the “Boulder Settlement” to reduce 

the obligation of Roy MacDowell from $300,000 to $60,000. See Docket No. 629 (“Motion”). 

The Motion was noticed for hearing on February 12, 2016. 

On February 4, 2016, ASM Capital filed a brief in which it asserts that the claims of the 

Claimants listed above were assigned to ASM Capital and therefore, that payment of their share of 

the settlement funds should be made directly to ASM Capital. The Claimants have not had an 

opportunity to respond to ASM Capital’s brief. Accordingly, the Court vacates the February 12, 

2016 hearing and sets the following schedule: Plaintiff’s counsel shall serve on each of the 

Claimants a copy of the Motion (Docket No. 629), the brief filed by ASM Capital (Docket No. 

637) and this Order, no later than February 19, 2016. Any Claimants who wishes to object to the 

payment of their settlement funds to ASM Capital under the assignments entered with ASM 

Case 3:09-cv-02079-JCS Document 638 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Cap

set

tha

det

Cla

Da

pital shall fi

tlement fund

an March 4, 

termines that

aimant who 

IT IS S

ated: Februa

le a brief add

ds were not a

2016. As o

t a hearing is

has filed an 

SO ORDER

ary 5, 2016 

dressing any

assigned to A

of that date, 

s required to

objection. 

RED. 

2

y legal or fac

ASM Capita

the Motion w

o decide the M

___

JO

Ch

ctual basis fo

al, and any re

will be taken

Motion, it w

__________

OSEPH C. SP

hief Magistra

or finding th

elevant supp

n under subm

will notify th

___________

PERO 

ate Judge 

hat their claim

porting evide

mission. If t

e parties and

__________

ms to the 

ence, no late

the Court 

d any 

________ 

r

Case 3:09-cv-02079-JCS Document 638 Filed 02/05/16 Page 2 of 2
From: McWilliams, Douglas A. [mailto:douglas.mcwilliams@squirepb.com]  

Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 3:07 PM

To: Greenberg, Alan (ENRD)

Cc: Franz, Katy M.; Kacenjar, Allen A.

Subject: Release of Confidential Business Information for BART FIP Settlement Rule Support ‐‐ Attachment L: Tilden SO2 Control

Cost Analysis [I‐AMS.FID1382176]

Alan,

As we discussed during our telephone conference on Friday, Cliffs is transmitting documents requested by EPA for use in support

of the BART FIP settlement rulemaking.   These are documents previously marked confidential business information.  In this e‐

mail, Cliffs is transmitting a redacted version of the Tilden SO2 Control Cost Analysis submitted as Attachment L to Cliffs’

September 28, 2012 comments on the BART FIP proposed rule.  Cliffs withdraws its claim of confidential business information as

to the redacted version of this document only.   

Additional documents requested by EPA with redactions sufficient for Cliffs to release CBI claims will be sent today via separate

e‐mails to ensure that the size of the attachments does not interfere with transmission.  

The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. Douglas A. McWilliams 

Partner 

Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP 

4900 Key Tower 

127 Public Square 

Cleveland, Ohio 44114 

T +1 216 479 8332 

O +1 216 479 8500 

F +1 216 479 8780 

M +1 216 407 4968 

Douglas.McWilliams@squirepb.com | squirepattonboggs.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------- 

44 Offices in 21 Countries 

This message is confidential and may be legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the 

intended recipient, please telephone or email the sender and delete this message and any attachment from your system; 

you must not copy or disclose the contents of this message or any attachment to any other person. 

Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP is part of the international legal practice Squire Patton Boggs, which operates 

worldwide through a number of separate legal entities. Please visit www.squirepattonboggs.com for more information.

#US 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Communication, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald
A. Duncan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


Date:  May 3, 2004                     /s/
                                       Ronald A. Duncan
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       General Communication, Inc.

                                       1
<PAGE>
    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Communication, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John M.
Lowber, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.



Date:  May 3, 2004                     /s/
                                       John M. Lowber
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       General Communication, Inc.

                                       2
Editorial Note on Part 984
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 984 appear at 65 FR 16731, Mar. 29, 2000.

§ 984.104 Basic requirements of the FSS program. ( a ) An FSS program established under this part shall be operated in conformity with the requirements of this part, including the Action Plan at § 984.201, and: ( 1 ) As applicable to voucher program participants: ( i ) HCV regulations at 24 CFR part 982, for HCV program participants; and
( ii ) Project-based voucher (PBV) regulations at 24 CFR part 983, for PBV program participants; and
( iii ) HCV Homeownership regulations at 24 CFR 982.625 through 982.643, for HCV homeownership participants;
( 2 ) As applicable to Mod Rehab and Mod Rehab SRO participants, 24 CFR part 882;
( 3 ) As applicable to public housing program participants, the applicable public housing regulations, including the regulations in 24 CFR parts 5, subpart F, 960, and 966; and,
( 4 ) The applicable nondiscrimination and equal opportunity requirements including, but not limited to, those set forth in 24 CFR part 5.
( b ) [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.1631 Safety device training.

Prior to engaging in production operations on a lease and periodically thereafter, personnel installing, inspecting, testing, and maintaining safety devices shall be instructed in the safety requirements of the operations to be performed; possible hazards to be encountered; and general safety considerations to be taken to protect personnel, equipment, and the environment. Date and time of safety meetings shall be recorded and available for BSEE review.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 327 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 12, 2005 

Received 

AN ACT 

To allow binding arbitration clauses to be included in all 

contracts affecting land within the Gila River Indian 

Community Reservation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

HR 327 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. BINDING ARBITRATION FOR GILA RIVER IN2 DIAN COMMUNITY RESERVATION CON3 TRACTS. 

4 (a) AMENDMENTS.—Subsection (f) of the first sec5 tion of the Act of August 9, 1955 (25 U.S.C. 415(f)), is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in the first sentence— 

8 (A) by striking ‘‘Any lease’’ and all that 

9 follows through ‘‘affecting land’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘Any contract, including a lease, affecting 

11 land’’; and 

12 (B) by striking ‘‘such lease or contract’’ 

13 and inserting ‘‘such contract’’; and 

14 (2) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘Such 

15 leases or contracts entered into pursuant to such 

16 Acts’’ and inserting ‘‘Such contracts’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in Public 

19 Law 107–159 (116 Stat. 122). 

Passed the House of Representatives December 7, 

2005. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHIMYERE M c CALL; MONROE M c CALL,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

v.
DAMON CHARLES WILLIAMS,

Defendant

- Appellant
, ZENE WILLIAMS,

Counter

- claimant

- Appellant

. No. 21

- 15638

D.C. No. 2:19

- cv

- 05126

- SMB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan M. Brnovich, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2022 * *

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Damon Charles Williams and Zene Williams appeal pro se from the district
court’s judgment in Chimyere and Monroe McCall’s diversity action

. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 21

- 15638

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291

. We review de novo the district court’s

summary judgment

. Furnace v. Sullivan , 705 F.3d 1021, 1026 (9th Cir. 2013).

We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on plaintiffs’

declaratory relief claim because the debt underlying the liens had been discharged

in bankruptcy. See In re Ybarra , 424 F.3d 1018, 1022 (9th Cir. 2005) (“A Chapter

7 bankruptcy discharge releases the debtor from personal liability for her pre

bankruptcy debts.”).

The district court proper l y granted summary judgment on plaintiffs’

wrongful lien claim as to the May 30, 2019 lien because defendants knew or had

reason to know that the May 30, 2019 lien was groundless

. See Ariz. Rev. Stat.

§ 33

- 420(A) (authorizing special action on the ground that a lien against real

property is groundless or otherwise invalid); Webber v. Grindle Audio Prods., Inc.
, 60 P.3d 224, 230 ( Ariz. Ct. App. 2002) (upholding liability under § 33

- 420(A) for

recording judgment liens when creditor knew that the judgment had been

discharged in bankruptcy)

. We reject as without merit defendants’ contentions that the district court was

biased.

AFFIRMED.