alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-40044

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JESUS ARCADIO CERON MUNOZ, also known as Compa, also known as 

Pastuso,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:12-CR-295-6

Before KING, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Jesus Arcadio Ceron Munoz has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Munoz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief 

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 24, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-40044 Document: 00514207455 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/24/2017
No. 17-40044

2

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 17-40044 Document: 00514207455 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/24/2017
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Derek R.McClain, certify that:

1.                I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trammell Crow Company;

2.                Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)                Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)               Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)                Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of  theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a)                All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)               Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: May 10, 2004 | /s/ Derek R. McClain       |
|-------------------------|----------------------------|
|                    | Derek R. McClain           |
|                    | *Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

----
Unassociated Document


 


AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO ASSET SERVICING AGREEMENT







This Amendment No. 2 to Asset Servicing Agreement (this “Amendment” is made as of the 15th day of October, 2010, among DVL, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“DVL”), Professional Service Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“PSC”), KM Realty Corporation, a North Carolina corporation (“KM”), and NPO Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“NPO”).







WITNESETH:







WHEREAS, DVL, PSC, KM and NPO (hereinafter collectively, the “Parties”) are parties to that certain Asset Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 27, 1996, as extended by an Asset Servicing Extension Agreement and further amended by Amendment No. 1 dated as of October 31, 2007 (as extended, the “Asset Servicing Agreement”);







WHEREAS, the Parties desire to further extend the Asset Servicing Agreement;







NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth in this Agreement, the parties agree as follows:







In accordance with Section 13 of the Asset Servicing Agreement, the Term is hereby extended for a period of three years beginning April 2, 2011 and extending to March 31, 2014.







Except as modified hereby, the Asset Servicing Agreement remains in full force and effect and the provisions thereof are hereby ratified and confirmed.







This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, all of which together shall for all purposes constitute one amendment, binding on all parties hereto, notwithstanding that the parties have not signed the same counterparts.







[signatures on following page]


 




  





  











  






 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written.







 

	 	DVL, Inc.	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Henry Swain	 
	 	Name:  	Henry Swain	 
	 	Title:  	Execute Vice President	 
	 	 	 	 













	 	PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION, INC.	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Henry Swain	 
	 	Name:  	Henry Swain	 
	 	Title:  	Execute Vice President	 
	 	 	 	 









	 	
KM REALTY CORPORATION

	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Alan Casnoff	 
	 	Name:  	Alan Casnoff	 
	 	Title:  	Authorized Signatory	 
	 	 	 	 









	 	NPO MANAGEMENT, LLC	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	By:   	 Pembroke Companies, Inc. Member	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
 

	 
By: 

	/s/ Lawrence J. Cohen	 
	 	 	Name:  	Lawrence J. Cohen	 
	 	  	Title: 	President
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA Comparison of Tension and Compression Creep in a Polymeric Composite and the Effects of Physical Aging on Creep BehaviorExperimental and analytical methods were used to investigate the similarities and differences of the effects of physical aging on creep compliance of IM7/K3B composite loaded in tension and compression. Two matrix dominated loading modes, shear and transverse, were investigated for two load cases, tension and compression. The tests, run over a range of sub-glass transition temperatures, provided material constants, material master curves and aging related parameters. Comparing results from the short-term data indicated that although trends in the data with respect to aging time and aging temperature are similar, differences exist due to load direction and mode. The analytical model used for predicting long-term behavior using short-term data as input worked equally as well for the tension or compression loaded cases. Comparison of the loading modes indicated that the predictive model provided more accurate long term predictions for the shear mode as compared to the transverse mode. Parametric studies showed the usefulness of the predictive model as a tool for investigating long-term performance and compliance acceleration due to temperature.Document ID19960045294Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsGates, Thomas S.*(NASA Hampton, VA United States)*Veazie, David R.*(Clark-Atlanta Univ. GA United States)*Brinson, L. Catherine*(Northwestern Univ. Evanston, IL United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1996Subject CategoryComposite MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-110273NAS 1.15: 110273Accession Number96N32261Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-50-18Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19960045294.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit
13.2








PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with this Annual Report of Top Ships Inc. (the "Company") on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Alexandros Tsirikos, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.








Date:
June 18, 2010








/s/
      Alexandros Tsirikos


Alexandros
Tsirikos


Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)











SK 23116 0006
1099579
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 79018)    
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; Stroke Clinical Research.                    

*Date:*                         December 17, 2020.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Shanta Rajaram, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NINDS/NIH, NSC, 6001 Executive Blvd., Suite 3208, MSC 9529,  Rockville, MD 20852, (301) 435-6033,                         *rajarams@mail.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 3, 2020.

Ronald J. Livingston, Jr.,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2020-26958 Filed 12-7-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### MAY et al., Respondents, v. COOK, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 3, 1905.)

Action by Nathan May, Henry Levy, and Michael May against George Cook. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
§ 9.160 Communications. ( a ) The agency shall take appropriate steps to ensure effective communication with applicants, participants, personnel of other Federal entities, and members of the public. ( 1 ) The agency shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids where necessary to afford an individual with disabilities an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a program or activity conducted by the agency. ( i ) In determining what type of auxiliary aid is necessary, the agency shall give primary consideration to the requests of the individual with disabilities.
( ii ) The agency need not provide individually prescribed devices, readers for personal use or study, or other devices of a personal nature.
( 2 ) Where the agency communicates with applicants and beneficiaries or members of the public by telephone, telecommunication devices for deaf persons (TDD's) or equally effective telecommunication systems shall be used to communicate with persons with impaired hearing.
( b ) The agency shall ensure that interested persons, including persons with impaired vision or hearing, can obtain information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( c ) The agency shall provide signage at a primary entrance to each of its inaccessible facilities, directing users to a location at which they can obtain information about accessible facilities. The international symbol for accessibility shall be used at each primary entrance of an accessible facility.
( d ) This section does not require the agency to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or in undue financial and administrative burdens. In those circumstances where agency personnel believe that the proposed action would fundamentally alter the program or activity or would result in undue financial and administrative burdens, the agency has the burden of proving that compliance with this section would result in such alteration or burdens. The decision that compliance would result in such alteration or burdens must be made by the Secretary or his or her designee after considering all agency resources available for use in the funding and operation of the conducted program or activity and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action required to comply with § 9.160 would result in such an alteration or such burdens, the agency shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with disabilities receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3342 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3342

      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on ethofumesate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 19, 2005

Mr. Jefferson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on ethofumesate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ETHOFUMESATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.05.19 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to ethofumesate) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 18.66 Tests of windows and lenses.

(a) *Impact tests.* A 4-pound cylindrical weight with a 1-inch-diameter hemispherical striking surface shall be dropped (free fall) to strike the window or lens in its mounting, or the equivalent thereof, at or near the center. Three of four samples shall withstand without breakage the impact according to the following table:

| Lens diameter, (D), inches | Height of fall, inches |
| --- | --- |
| D<4 | 6 |
| 4≤D<5 | 9 |
| 5≤D<6 | 15 |
| 6≤D | 24 |

Windows or lenses of smaller diameter than 1 inch may be tested by alternate methods at the discretion of MSHA.

(b) *Thermal-shock tests.* Four samples of the window or lens will be heated in an oven for 15 minutes to a temperature of 150 °C. (302 °F.) and immediately upon withdrawal of the samples from the oven they will be immersed in water having a temperature between 15 °C. (59 °F) and 20 °C. (68 °F.). Three of the four samples shall show no defect or breakage from this thermal-shock test.
#### Direct Media, Inc., Respondent, v A. Z. Lists, Inc., et al., Appellants.

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for unfair competition, defendants appeal (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered October 4,1977, which, *inter alia,*granted plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction enjoining any further use by defendants of certain catalog cards containing business information and further contact by *1049defendants with plaintiff’s past, present and future employees and (2) as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court, entered September 13, 1977, as, upon reargument, adhered to a prior order of the same court, entered July 7, 1977, which only partially granted defendants’ motion to strike interrogatories. Order entered October 4, 1977, affirmed. Order entered September 13, 1977 modified, by adding thereto, after the provision that the order entered July 7, 1977 is adhered to, the following: "except that the phrase 'the nature of the transaction’ is stricken from interrogatory number 11.” As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from. Plaintiff is awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements to cover both appeals. The order of October 4, 1977, which enjoined defendants from making any use of plaintiff’s "catalog cards” and directed their return was proper. The order of September 13, 1977 has been modified to the extent indicated since defendants should not be required to divulge information concerning recommendations made to customers. Such information can be considered a legitimate trade secret. Titone, J. P., Suozzi, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
#### § 1243.5 May another person post a bond or other surety instrument or demonstrate financial solvency on my behalf?

Any other person, including a designee, payor, or affiliate, may post a bond or other surety instrument or demonstrate financial solvency under this part on behalf of an appellant required to post a bond or other surety instrument under § 1243.4(a)(1).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,723
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     22,490
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           1,576
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             1,586
<LOANS>                                         28,326
<ALLOWANCE>                                        364
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,098
<DEPOSITS>                                      51,837
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                306
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,960
<OTHER-SE>                                          (5)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  60,098
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    675
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  347
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    69
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,091
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 564
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 564
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              527
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        2
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    378
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    181
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         118
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       118
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.68
<LOANS-NON>                                         27
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   360
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  364
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               364
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>