77996 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 233 / Thursday, December 3, 2020 / Rules and Regulations 

Small businesses may send comments 

on the actions of Federal employees 

who enforce, or otherwise determine 

compliance with, Federal regulations to 

the Small Business and Agriculture 

Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman 

and the Regional Small Business 

Regulatory Fairness Boards. The 

Ombudsman evaluates these actions 

annually and rates each agency’s 

responsiveness to small business. If you 

wish to comment on actions by 

employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– 

888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The 

Coast Guard will not retaliate against 

small entities that question or complain 

about this rule or any policy or action 

of the Coast Guard. 

C. Collection of Information 

This rule will not call for a new 

collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520). 

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal 

Governments 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on the States, on the relationship 

between the National Government and 

the States, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government. We have 

analyzed this rule under that Order and 

have determined that it is consistent 

with the fundamental federalism 

principles and preemption requirements 

described in Executive Order 13132. 

Also, this rule does not have tribal 

implications under Executive Order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. 

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this rule 

will not result in such an expenditure, 

we do discuss the effects of this rule 

elsewhere in this preamble. 

F. Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Department of Homeland Security 

Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated 

implementing instructions, and 

Environmental Planning COMDTINST 

5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 

U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have 

determined that this action is one of a 

category of actions that do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule involves a safety 

zone that will prohibit entry on a onemile stretch of the Lower Mississippi 

River for three hours on one evening. It 

is categorically excluded from further 

review under paragraph L60(a) of 

Appendix A, Table 1 of UDHS 

Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01, 

Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental 

Consideration supporting this 

determination is available in the docket. 

For instructions on locating the docket, 

see the ADDRESSES section of this 

preamble. 

G. Protest Activities 

The Coast Guard respects the First 

Amendment rights of protesters. 

Protesters are asked to call or email the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

coordinate protest activities so that your 

message can be received without 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places or vessels. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 

1.05–1; 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Department of Homeland Security Delegation 

No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Add § 165.T08–0641 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T08–0641 Safety Zone; Lower 

Mississippi River, Natchez, MS. 

(a) Location. The following area is a 

safety zone: All navigable waters of the 

Lower Mississippi River from Mile 

Marker (MM) 364.5 through MM 365.5. 

(b) Regulations. (1) Under the general 

safety zone regulations in subpart C of 

this part, you may not enter the safety 

zone described in paragraph (a) of this 

section unless authorized by the Captain 

of the Port Sector Lower Mississippi 

River (COTP) or the COTP’s designated 

representative. 

(2) To seek permission to enter, 

contact the COTP or the COTP’s 

representative via VHF–FM channel 16 

or by telephone at 901–521–4822. Those 

in the safety zone must comply with all 

lawful orders or directions given to 

them by the COTP or the COTP’s 

designated representative. 

(c) Enforcement period. This section 

will be enforced 4 p.m. through 7 p.m. 

on December 31, 2020. Periods of 

activation will be promulgated by 

Broadcast Notice to Mariners. 

Dated: November 2, 2020. 

R.S. Rhodes, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Sector Lower Mississippi River. 

[FR Doc. 2020–26177 Filed 12–2–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2020–0136; FRL–10016– 

79–Region 9] 

Air Plan Partial Approval and Partial 

Disapproval; California; San Diego 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking final action to 

partially approve and partially 

disapprove revisions to the San Diego 

Air Pollution Control District (SDAPCD 

or ‘‘District’’) portion of the California 

State Implementation Plan (SIP). These 

revisions concern the District’s 

demonstration regarding reasonably 

available control technology (RACT) 

requirements and negative declarations 

for the 2008 ozone national ambient air 

quality standards (NAAQS or 

‘‘standards’’) in the San Diego ozone 

nonattainment area under the 

jurisdiction of the SDAPCD. 

DATES: This rule will be effective on 

January 4, 2021. 

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

No. EPA–R09–OAR–2020–0136. All 

documents in the docket are listed on 

the https://www.regulations.gov 

website. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, e.g., Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 233 / Thursday, December 3, 2020 / Rules and Regulations 77997 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available through https://

www.regulations.gov, or please contact 

the person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section for 

additional availability information. If 

you need assistance in a language other 

than English or if you are a person with 

disabilities who needs a reasonable 

accommodation at no cost to you, please 

contact the person identified in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nancy Levin, EPA Region IX, 75 

Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 

94105. By phone: (415) 972–3848 or by 

email at levin.nancy@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. Proposed Action 

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses 

III. EPA Action 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Proposed Action 

On August 10, 2020 (85 FR 48127), 

the EPA proposed to partially approve 

and partially disapprove the California 

Air Resources Board’s April 12, 2017 

submittal of the 2008 Eight-Hour Ozone 

Reasonably Available Control 

Technology Demonstration for San 

Diego County (‘‘2016 RACT SIP’’). 

TABLE 1—SUBMITTED DOCUMENT

Local agency Document Adopted Submitted 

SDAPCD ............. 2008 Eight-Hour Ozone Reasonably Available Control Technology Demonstration for San 

Diego County (‘‘2016 RACT SIP’’).

12/14/16 4/12/2017 

Our proposed action contains more 

information on the submittal and our 

evaluation. 

II. Public Comments and EPA 

Responses 

The EPA’s proposed action provided 

a 30-day public comment period. During 

this period, we received two comments. 

One comment was supportive, and the 

other was not germane. 

III. EPA Action 

No comments were submitted that 

change our assessment of the 2016 

RACT SIP as described in our proposed 

action. Therefore, we are finalizing a 

partial approval and partial disapproval 

of the 2016 RACT SIP. As authorized in 

sections 110(k)(3) and 301(a) of the 

CAA, the EPA is finalizing a partial 

disapproval of the 2016 RACT SIP with 

respect to those portions addressing the 

following source categories: Design 

Criteria for Stage I Vapor Control 

Systems—Gasoline Service Stations 

(EPA–450/R–75–102); Tank Truck 

Gasoline Loading Terminals (EPA–450/ 

2–77–026); Manufacture of Synthesized 

Pharmaceutical Products (EPA–450/2– 

78–029); Industrial Cleaning Solvents 

(EPA–453/R–06–001); Fiberglass Boat 

Manufacturing Materials (EPA–453/R– 

08–004); Non-CTG major sources of 

VOC; and Miscellaneous Metal and 

Plastic Parts Coatings (EPA–453/R–08– 

003) Table 3—Plastic Parts and 

Products, Table 4—Automotive/ 

Transportation and Business Machine 

Plastic Parts, Table 5—Pleasure Craft 

Surface Coating, and Table 6—Motor 

Vehicle Materials. As a result of the 

final partial disapproval, offset 

sanctions will be imposed unless the 

EPA approves a subsequent SIP revision 

that corrects the identified deficiencies 

within 18 months of the effective date 

of this action. Highway sanctions will 

be imposed unless the EPA approves a 

subsequent SIP revision that corrects the 

rule deficiencies within 24 months of 

the effective date of this action. These 

sanctions will be imposed under section 

179 of the CAA and 40 CFR 52.31. 

Additionally, section 110(c) requires the 

EPA to promulgate a Federal 

implementation plan within 24 months 

unless we approve subsequent SIP 

revisions that correct the rule 

deficiencies. 

As authorized in sections 110(k)(3) 

and 301(a) of the CAA, the EPA is 

finalizing a partial approval of the 2016 

RACT SIP with respect to all remaining 

source categories, as proposed. The EPA 

is also finalizing an approval of the 

District’s negative declarations as 

proposed. 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Additional information about these 

statutes and Executive orders can be 

found at http://www.epa.gov/lawsregulations/laws-and-executive-orders. 

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory 

Planning and Review and Executive 

Order 13563: Improving Regulation and 

Regulatory Review 

This action is not a significant 

regulatory action and was therefore not 

submitted to the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) for review. 

B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing 

Regulations and Controlling Regulatory 

Costs 

This action is not an Executive Order 

13771 regulatory action because this 

action is not significant under Executive 

Order 12866. 

C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) 

This action does not impose an 

information collection burden under the 

PRA, because this SIP partial approval 

and partial disapproval does not in-andof itself create any new information 

collection burdens, but simply partially 

approves and partially disapproves 

certain State requirements for inclusion 

in the SIP. 

D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) 

I certify that this action will not have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the RFA. This action will not 

impose any requirements on small 

entities. This SIP partial approval and 

partial disapproval does not in-and-of 

itself create any new requirements but 

simply partially approves and partially 

disapproves certain pre-existing State 

requirements for inclusion in the SIP. 

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

(UMRA) 

This action does not contain any 

unfunded mandate as described in 

UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does 

not significantly or uniquely affect small 

governments. This action partially 

approves and partially disapproves preexisting requirements under State or 

local law and imposes no new 

requirements. Accordingly, no 

additional costs to state, local, or tribal 

governments, or to the private sector, 

result from this action. 

F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism 

This action does not have federalism 

implications. It will not have substantial 

direct effects on the states, on the 

relationship between the National 

Government and the states, or on the 

distribution of power and 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
77998 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 233 / Thursday, December 3, 2020 / Rules and Regulations 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

G. Executive Order 13175: Coordination 

With Indian Tribal Governments 

This action does not have tribal 

implications, as specified in Executive 

Order 13175, because the SIP revision 

that the EPA is partially disapproving 

would not apply on any Indian 

reservation land or in any other area 

where the EPA or an Indian tribe has 

demonstrated that a tribe has 

jurisdiction, and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law. 

Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not 

apply to this action. 

H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of 

Children From Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks 

The EPA interprets Executive Order 

13045 as applying only to those 

regulatory actions that concern 

environmental health or safety risks that 

the EPA has reason to believe may 

disproportionately affect children, per 

the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory 

action’’ in section 2–202 of the 

Executive order. This action is not 

subject to Executive Order 13045 

because this SIP partial approval and 

partial disapproval does not in-and-of 

itself create any new regulations, but 

simply partially approves and partially 

disapproves certain pre-existing State 

requirements for inclusion in the SIP. 

I. Executive Order 13211: Actions That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use 

This action is not subject to Executive 

Order 13211, because it is not a 

significant regulatory action under 

Executive Order 12866. 

J. National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act (NTTAA) 

Section 12(d) of the NTTAA directs 

the EPA to use voluntary consensus 

standards in its regulatory activities 

unless to do so would be inconsistent 

with applicable law or otherwise 

impractical. The EPA believes that this 

action is not subject to the requirements 

of section 12(d) of the NTTAA because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA. 

K. Executive Order 12898: Federal 

Actions To Address Environmental 

Justice in Minority Populations and 

Low-Income Populations 

The EPA lacks the discretionary 

authority to address environmental 

justice in this rulemaking. 

L. Congressional Review Act (CRA) 

This action is subject to the CRA, and 

the EPA will submit a rule report to 

each House of the Congress and to the 

Comptroller General of the United 

States. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ 

as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

M. Petitions for Judicial Review 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by February 1, 2021. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of this rule for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements (see section 

307(b)(2)). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: November 10, 2020. 

John Busterud, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, the Environmental Protection 

Agency amends part 52, chapter I, title 

40 of the Code of Federal Regulations 

follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart F—California 

■ 2. Section 52.220 is amended by 

adding paragraph (c)(547) to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.220 Identification of plan—in part. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(547) The following plan was 

submitted on April 12, 2017 by the 

Governor’s designee. 

(i) [Reserved] 

(ii) Additional materials. (A) San 

Diego Air Pollution Control District. 

(1) 2008 Eight-Hour Ozone 

Reasonably Available Control 

Technology Demonstration for San 

Diego County except those portions 

addressing the following source 

categories: Design Criteria for Stage I 

Vapor Control Systems—Gasoline 

Service Stations (EPA–450/R–75–102); 

Tank Truck Gasoline Loading Terminals 

(EPA–450/2–77–026); Manufacture of 

Synthesized Pharmaceutical Products 

(EPA–450/2–78–029); Industrial 

Cleaning Solvents (EPA–453/R–06–001); 

Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials 

(EPA–453/R–08–004); Non-CTG major 

sources of VOC; and Miscellaneous 

Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings (EPA– 

453/R–08–003) Table 3—Plastic Parts 

and Products, Table 4—Automotive/ 

Transportation and Business Machine 

Plastic Parts, Table 5—Pleasure Craft 

Surface Coating, and Table 6—Motor 

Vehicle Materials. 

(2) [Reserved] 

(B) [Reserved] 

■ 3. Section 52.222 is amended by 

adding paragraph (a)(5)(ii) to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.222 Negative declarations. 

(a) * * * 

(5) * * * 

(ii) The following negative 

declarations for the 2008 ozone NAAQS 

were adopted by the San Diego Air 

Pollution Control District on December 

14, 2016, and submitted to the EPA on 

April 12, 2017. 

TABLE 4 TO PARAGRAPH (a)(5)(ii)—NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS FOR THE 2008 OZONE NAAQS 

CTG document No. CTG document title 

EPA–450/2–77–008 ....... Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume II: Surface Coating of Cans, Coils, 

Paper, Fabrics, Automobiles, and Light-Duty Trucks (Automobiles, and light-duty truck coatings only). 

EPA–450/2–77–025 ....... Control of Refinery Vacuum Producing Systems, Wastewater Separators, and Process Unit Turnarounds. 

EPA–450/2–77–032 ....... Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume III: Surface Coating of Metal Furniture. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 233 / Thursday, December 3, 2020 / Rules and Regulations 77999 

TABLE 4 TO PARAGRAPH (a)(5)(ii)—NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS FOR THE 2008 OZONE NAAQS—Continued 

CTG document No. CTG document title 

EPA–450/2–77–033 ....... Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume IV: Surface Coating of Insulation of 

Magnet Wire. 

EPA–450/2–77–034 ....... Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume V: Surface Coating of Large Appliances. 

EPA–450/2–78–030 ....... Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacture of Pneumatic Rubber Tires. 

EPA–450/2–78–032 ....... Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume VII: Factory Surface Coating of Flat 

Wood Paneling. 

EPA–450/2–78–036 ....... Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment. 

EPA–450/3–82–009 ....... Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Large Petroleum Dry Cleaners. 

EPA–450/3–83–006 ....... Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Synthetic Organic Chemical Polymer and Resin Manufacturing 

Equipment. 

EPA–450/3–83–007 ....... Control of Volatile Organic Compound Equipment Leaks from Natural Gas/Gasoline Processing Plants. 

EPA–450/3–83–008 ....... Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Manufacture of High-Density Polyethylene, Polypropylene, and 

Polystyrene Resins. 

EPA–450/3–84–015 ....... Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Air Oxidation Processes in Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry. 

EPA–450/4–91–031 ....... Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Reactor Processes and Distillation Operations in Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry. 

EPA–453/R–97–004; 59 

FR 29216 (6/6/94).

Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Coating Operations at Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework 

Operations; Aerospace MACT. 

EPA–453/R–06–004 ...... Control Techniques Guidelines for Flat Wood Paneling Coatings. 

EPA–453/R–07–004 ...... Control Techniques Guidelines for Large Appliance Coatings. 

EPA–453/R–07–005 ...... Control Techniques Guidelines for Metal Furniture Coatings. 

EPA–453/R–08–006 ...... Control Techniques Guidelines for Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coatings. 

* * * * * 

■ 4. Section 52.237 is amended by 

adding paragraph (b)(2) to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.237 Part D disapproval. 

(b) * * * 

(2) San Diego Air Pollution Control 

District. 

(i) RACT determinations for the 

following source categories in the 

submittal titled ‘‘2008 Eight-Hour Ozone 

Reasonably Available Control 

Technology Demonstration for San 

Diego County,’’ dated December 2016, 

as adopted December 14, 2016, and 

submitted on April 12, 2017. 

(A) Design Criteria for Stage I Vapor 

Control Systems—Gasoline Service 

Stations (EPA–450/R–75–102). 

(B) Tank Truck Gasoline Loading 

Terminals (EPA–450/2–77–026). 

(C) Manufacture of Synthesized 

Pharmaceutical Products (EPA–450/2– 

78–029). 

(D) Industrial Cleaning Solvents 

(EPA–453/R–06–001). 

(E) Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing 

Materials (EPA–453/R–08–004). 

(F) Non-CTG major sources of VOC. 

(G) Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic 

Parts Coatings (EPA–453/R–08–003) 

Table 3—Plastic Parts and Products, 

Table 4—Automotive/Transportation 

and Business Machine Plastic Parts, 

Table 5—Pleasure Craft Surface Coating, 

and Table 6—Motor Vehicle Materials. 

(ii) [Reserved] 

[FR Doc. 2020–26649 Filed 12–2–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2019–0461; FRL–10016–23] 

Sethoxydim; Pesticide Tolerances 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes 

tolerances for residues of sethoxydim in 

or on basil, dried leaves and basil, fresh 

leaves. Interregional Research Project 

Number 4 (IR–4) requested these 

tolerances under the Federal Food, 

Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). 

DATES: This regulation is effective 

December 3, 2020. Objections and 

requests for hearings must be received 

on or before February 1, 2021, and must 

be filed in accordance with the 

instructions provided in 40 CFR part 

178 (see also Unit I.C. of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2019–0461, is 

available at http://www.regulations.gov 

or at the Office of Pesticide Programs 

Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) 

in the Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William 

Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 

20460–0001. The Public Reading Room 

is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, 

and the telephone number for the OPP 

Docket is (703) 305–5805. 

Due to the public health concerns 

related to COVID–19, the EPA Docket 

Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is 

closed to visitors with limited 

exceptions. The staff continues to 

provide remote customer service via 

email, phone, and webform. For the 

latest status information on EPA/DC 

services and docket access, visit https:// 

www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Marietta Echeverria, Registration 

Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide 

Programs, Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, 

Washington, DC 20460–0001; main 

telephone number: (703) 305–7090; 

email address: RDFRNotices@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. The following 

list of North American Industrial 

Classification System (NAICS) codes is 

not intended to be exhaustive, but rather 

provides a guide to help readers 

determine whether this document 

applies to them. Potentially affected 

entities may include: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES