alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 792

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 792 appear at 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999.

#### § 792.101 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to encourage public housing agencies (PHAs) to investigate and pursue instances of tenant and owner fraud and abuse in the operation of the Section 8 housing assistance payments programs.

[64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999]
Exhibit 4.94


 


Summary of the Rural Partnership Agreement,
entered into on May 25, 2022, in connection with Fazenda Regalito.


 


Parties:
BrasilAgro – Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas, as the economic group interested in entering into a rural partnership
agreement; and with Luiz Alfredo Feresin de Abreu, as the owner of the land.


 


Purpose: Granting
of the possession, for twelve years, counted as of June 1, 2022 (commencement date of the term), of a total area equivalent to 5,714 arable
hectares of Regalito Farm on behalf of BrasilAgro – Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas, for
purposes of the exploitation of the land under a rural partnership regime, by means of the sharing, by and among the parties, of the earnings
received from the crops/harvests arising from the aforementioned partnership. BrasilAgro – Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades
Agrícolas shall be entitled to approximately 83.5% of the earnings, and Luiz Alfredo Feresin de Abreu shall be entitled to the
remaining 16.5% of the earnings therefrom.
#### § 1217.302 Definitions.

Terms used in this subpart will have the same meaning as in 30 U.S.C. 1702.
EX-10.3


   

  Exhibit 10.3

   

  AMENDMENT TO THE

  AIRGAIN, INC. 2021 EMPLOYMENT INDUCEMENT INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN

    

  THIS AMENDMENT TO the Airgain, INC. 2021 EMPLOYMENT INDUCEMENT INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN (this “Amendment”), effective as of October 17, 2022, is made and adopted by Airgain, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan (as defined below).

  RECITALS

  WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Airgain, Inc. 2021 Employment Inducement Incentive Award Plan(as amended from time to time, the “Plan”); 

  WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10.5 of the Plan, the Plan may be amended by the Administrator of the Plan at any time;

  WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) is the Administrator of the Plan;

  WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3.1 of the Plan, the Board may re-vest administrative authority over the Plan to itself at any time;

  WHEREAS, the Board has re-vested itself administrative authority over the Plan solely with respect to and for purposes of approving this Amendment and, pursuant to such authority, adopted and approved this Amendment.

  NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Company hereby amends the Plan as follows:

  1.Section 11.28 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


  “11.28 ‘Overall Share Limit’ means 700,000 Shares.”

  2.This Amendment shall be and is hereby incorporated in and forms a part of the Plan.  


  3.Except as expressly provided herein, all other terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.  


  
 

  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereby certify that this Amendment was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of Airgain, Inc. on October 17, 2022.

    

    

  Airgain, Inc.                             

    

  By: _/s/ Jacob Suen_________________________

  Jacob Suen

  President and Chief Executive Officer                           

               

    

  Date: _____October 17, 2022____________________
### §331. Very high frequency stations and AM radio stations

#### (a) Very high frequency stations

It shall be the policy of the Federal Communications Commission to allocate channels for very high frequency commercial television broadcasting in a manner which ensures that not less than one such channel shall be allocated to each State, if technically feasible. In any case in which licensee of a very high frequency commercial television broadcast station notifies the Commission to the effect that such licensee will agree to the reallocation of its channel to a community within a State in which there is allocated no very high frequency commercial television broadcast channel at the time 1 such notification, the Commission shall, notwithstanding any other provision of law, order such reallocation and issue a license to such licensee for that purpose pursuant to such notification for a term of not to exceed 5 years as provided in section 307(d) 2 of this title.

#### (b) AM radio stations

It shall be the policy of the Commission, in any case in which the licensee of an existing AM daytime-only station located in a community with a population of more than 100,000 persons that lacks a local full-time aural station licensed to that community and that is located within a Class I station primary service area notifies the Commission that such licensee seeks to provide full-time service, to ensure that such a licensee is able to place a principal community contour signal over its entire community of license 24 hours a day, if technically feasible.

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title III, §331, as added Pub. L. 97–248, title III, §355, Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 641; amended Pub. L. 102–243, §4, Dec. 20, 1991, 105 Stat. 2402; Pub. L. 103–414, title III, §303(a)(18), Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4295; Pub. L. 115–141, div. P, title IV, §402(i)(5), Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1089.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Subsec. (d) of section 307 of this title, referred to in subsec. (a), was redesignated subsec. (c) of section 307 by Pub. L. 97–259, title I, §112(a), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1093.

#### Codification

Another section 331 of act June 19, 1934 was renumbered section 332 and is classified to section 332 of this title.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 331, act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title III, §331, as added Sept. 14, 1973, Pub. L. 93–107, §1, 87 Stat. 350, related to broadcasting of games of professional sports clubs, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 93–107, §2, Sept. 14, 1973, 87 Stat. 351, effective Dec. 31, 1975.

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 115–141 struck out at end: "The Commission shall report to the appropriate committees of Congress within 30 days after December 20, 1991, on how it intends to meet this policy goal."

1994—Pub. L. 103–414 amended section catchline generally.

1991—Pub. L. 102–243 inserted "and AM radio stations" in section catchline, designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and inserted heading, and added subsec. (b).

1 So in original. Probably should be followed by "of".

2 See References in Text note below.
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



I, James A. Konrath, Chief Executive Officer of Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT
Trust (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which this
certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.



Date: March 30, 2005



By:

/S/ JAMES A. KONRATHJames A. KonrathChief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust and will be retained by Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### § 58.45 Public comment periods.

Required notices must afford the public the following minimum comment periods, counted in accordance with § 58.21:

| (a) Notice of Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) | 15 days when published in a general circulation newspaper or on a Government website that is accessible to individuals with disabilities and provides meaningful access for individuals with Limited English Proficiency or, if no publication, 18 days when mailing and posting. |
| --- | --- |
| (b) Notice of Intent to Request Release of Funds (NOI-RROF) | 7 days when published in a general circulation newspaper or on a Government website that is accessible to individuals with disabilities and provides meaningful access for individuals with Limited English Proficiency or, if no publication, 10 days when mailing and posting. |
| (c) Concurrent or combined notices | 15 days when published in a general circulation newspaper or on a Government website that is accessible to individuals with disabilities and provides meaningful access for individuals with Limited English Proficiency or, if no publication, 18 days when mailing and posting. |

[68 FR 56130, Sept. 29, 2003, as amended at 89 FR 30913, Apr. 23, 2024]
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

www.nasa.gov

NASA’s Space Launch System — Powering the Future of Exploration
NASA’s Space Launch System — Powering the Future of Exploration

America’s new Space Launch System (SLS) will provide the heavy-lift capability necessary to propel the next generation of explorers on entirely new missions throughout the solar system. From asteroids to Mars, SLS will be a key infrastructure asset that, along with the Orion spacecraft, allows NASA to send humans beyond Earth’s orbit for the first time since the Apollo Moon program. This next wave of human exploration will transport us to new worlds—finding potential resources, developing new technologies, and discovering answers to mysteries about our place in the universe.While work progresses on the initial 70-metric ton SLS, NASA is conducting advanced development activities to reduce costs, increase reliability, and deliver the performance needed to evolve the initial vehicle to configurations with even greater lift capacity. As the SLS evolves, a 130-metric ton rocket will be designed to support a variety of missions to carry crew, equipment, and experiments of varying sizes on long-duration trips.As part of the development process, hardware designed to connect spacecraft and other payloads to SLS will first be flown on Exploration Flight Test 1 (EFT-1), which will fly the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle test article to high-Earth orbit in 2014. EFT-1 will be followed by two flight tests of the 70-metric ton vehicle, sending Orion beyond low Earth orbit in 2017 and 2021. These first two planned exploration flights of SLS will set the stage for a range of missions NASA is considering, including the best path for humans to explore Mars—the planet most like Earth.

LG-2012-06-058-MSFC

February 2013

7,800,000

pounds of thrust

65,000

pounds of payload

8,400,000

pounds of thrust

154,000

pounds of payload

7,610,000

pounds of thrust

262,000

pounds of payload

9,200,000

pounds of thrust

286,000

pounds of payload

www.nasa.gov/sls

As NASA’s commercial partners create an American supply line to the International Space Station, SLS will provide the transportation for crews to forge a route to far frontiers. It will be the most powerful rocket in history and it is being built in the U.S.A. today. SLS is designed to fly many missions—to wherever our imaginations can take us.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 332 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 332

To amend the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 
   1996 to require that, in order to determine that a democratically 
  elected government in Cuba exists, the government extradite to the 
United States convicted felon William Morales and all other individuals 
 who are living in Cuba in order to escape prosecution or confinement 
         for criminal offenses committed in the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 2005

Mr. King of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 
              to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 
   1996 to require that, in order to determine that a democratically 
  elected government in Cuba exists, the government extradite to the 
United States convicted felon William Morales and all other individuals 
 who are living in Cuba in order to escape prosecution or confinement 
         for criminal offenses committed in the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO LIBERTAD ACT.

    Section 206 of the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity 
(LIBERTAD) Act of 1996 (22 U.S.C. 6066) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (5), by striking ``and'' after the 
        semicolon;
            (2) in paragraph (6), by striking the period and inserting 
        ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(7) has proven its respect for the democratic rule of law 
        by ceasing to provide a safe harbor to individuals who have 
        been legally indicted or convicted of serious criminal 
        offenses, including convicted felon William Morales, and all 
        other individuals who have fled from the United States to Cuba 
        for the sole purpose of avoiding prosecution or confinement for 
        serious criminal offenses committed in the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
### §343. Conditions on commercial terrestrial operations

#### (a) In general

The Commission shall not permit commercial terrestrial operations in the 1525–1559 megahertz band or the 1626.5–1660.5 megahertz band until the date that is 90 days after the Commission resolves concerns of widespread harmful interference by such operations in such band to covered GPS devices.

#### (b) Notice to Congress

#### (1) In general

At the conclusion of the decision regarding whether to permit such operations in such band, the Commission shall submit to the congressional committees described in paragraph (2) official copies of the documents containing the final decision of the Commission. If the decision is to permit such operations in such band, such documents shall contain or be accompanied by an explanation of how the concerns described in subsection (a) have been resolved.

#### (2) Congressional committees described

The congressional committees described in this paragraph are the following:

(A) The Committee on Energy and Commerce and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives.

(B) The Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate.

#### (c) Covered GPS device defined

In this section, the term "covered GPS device" means a Global Positioning System device of the Department of Defense.

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title III, §343, as added Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XVI, §1698(a), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2641.)
§ 104.4 Termination of notice. ( a ) Termination of a section 104(e)(1) pattern of violations notice shall occur when an MSHA inspection of the entire mine finds no S&S violations or if MSHA does not issue a withdrawal order in accordance with section 104(e)(1) of the Mine Act within 90 days after the issuance of the pattern of violations notice.
( b ) The mine operator may request an inspection of the entire mine or portion of the mine. MSHA will not provide advance notice of the inspection and will determine the scope of the inspection. Inspections of portions of the mine, within 90 days, that together cover the entire mine shall constitute an inspection of the entire mine for the purposes of this part.
Exhibit 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF CB RICHARD ELLIS TRUST



|                                 |  |                                          
|-------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary               |  | Jurisdiction of Formation / Incorporation
|CBRE Operating Partnership, L.P. |  | Delaware                                 
|                                 | 
|RT Deerfield I, LLC              |  | Delaware                                 
|                                 | 
|RT Deerfield II, LLC             |  | Delaware                                 
|                                 | 
|RT Texas Industrial, L.P.        |  | Delaware                                 
|                                 | 
|RT Texas Industrial, LLC         |  | Delaware                                 
|                                 | 
|RT Taunton, LLC                  |  | Delaware
#### In the Matter of Gust L. Freeman, Jr., et al., Appellants, v Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals, Respondent, and Michael Goodfriend et al., Intervenors-Respondents.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered March 9, 1977 in Tompkins County, which dismissed petitioners’ application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, seeking the annulment of a determination of the respondent board. On September 23, 1976, the respondent Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals approved an application by the intervenors-respondents to construct a medical clinic in a residential district. Upon the issuance of a special permit therefor, such a clinic is a permitted use in the district, and in the present proceeding petitioners argue that the intervenors-respondents’ special permit for their clinic was improperly granted. Special Term disagreed, however, and this appeal ensued. Seeking a reversal of the judgment below, petitioners principally argue here that the approved application for a clinic is identical with an earlier application which was disapproved and, consequently, the board was without power to entertain the second application. We cannot agree. It is settled law that there can be a new application and determination by a zoning board when "new plans materially change the aspects of the case” *(Matter of Reed v Board of Standards & Appeals of City of N. Y.,*255 NY 126, 133). Moreover, it is for the board to determine whether or not changed facts or circumstances are presented and, in so doing, it may give weight even "to slight differences not easily discernible” *(Ellsworth Realty Co. v Kramer,*268 App Div 824). In this instance, even petitioners concede that, in the approved application, the placement of the clinic on the lot was altered by rotating the structure 90 degrees and the location of the parking lot was changed. Accordingly, the board’s determination approving the intervenors-respondents’ proposal as a new application was clearly not arbitrary, and there was ample evidentiary support therefor in the record. Such being the case, the determination must be sustained *(Matter of Burlinson*v *Zoning Bd. of Appeals of City of Yonkers,*275 App *1071Div 723). In conclusion, we would point out that petitioners mistakenly rely upon the case of *Matter of Douglaston Civic Assn. v Galvin*(36 NY2d 1) in arguing that the intervenors-respondents improperly withheld from their initial rejected application available evidence later utilized to justify as something novel their second application. Since it relates to a rehearing of a single application, rather than to two separate applications such as we have here, the *Douglaston*decision is inapplicable to the present situation. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Kane, J. P., Staley, Jr., Main, Larkin and Mikoll, JJ., concur.
#### Abner C. Barr, defendant in error, v. Angela Barr, plaintiff in error.

Bill for divorce by husband on ground of extreme and repeated cruelty. Decree granted. Error to the City Court of City of Litchfield; the Hon. John H. Fornhoff, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1923.

Reversed and cause remanded.

Opinion filed April 23, 1923.

P. McWilliams, for plaintiff in error. Burton & Burton and J. A. Lynn, for defendant in error.

Mr. Presiding Justice Heard

delivered the opinion of the court.
Editorial Note on Part 982
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999, and at 89 FR 38293, May 7, 2024.

§ 982.309 Term of assisted tenancy. ( a ) *Initial term of lease.* ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, the initial lease term must be for at least one year.
( 2 ) The PHA may approve a shorter initial lease term if the PHA determines that: ( i ) Such shorter term would improve housing opportunities for the tenant; and
( ii ) Such shorter term is the prevailing local market practice.
( 3 ) During the initial term of the lease, the owner may not raise the rent to owner.
( 4 ) The PHA may execute the HAP contract even if there is less than one year remaining from the beginning of the initial lease term to the end of the last expiring funding increment under the consolidated ACC.
( b ) *Term of HAP contract.* ( 1 ) The term of the HAP contract begins on the first day of the lease term and ends on the last day of the lease term.
( 2 ) The HAP contract terminates if any of the following occurs: ( i ) The lease is terminated by the owner or the tenant;
( ii ) The PHA terminates the HAP contract; or
( iii ) The PHA terminates assistance for the family.
( c ) *Family responsibility.* ( 1 ) If the family terminates the lease on notice to the owner, the family must give the PHA a copy of the notice of termination at the same time. Failure to do this is a breach of family obligations under the program.
( 2 ) The family must notify the PHA and the owner before the family moves out of the unit. Failure to do this is a breach of family obligations under the program.
[64 FR 26645, May 14, 1999]
§ 902.50 Capital Fund program assessment. ( a ) *Objective.* The Capital Fund program indicator examines the period of time taken by a PHA to obligate funds and occupy units in relation to statutory deadlines for obligation for all Capital Fund program grants for which fund balances remain during the assessed fiscal year. Funds from the Capital Fund program under section 9(d) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 1437g(d)) do not include HOPE VI program funds.
( b ) *Applicability.* This indicator is applicable on a PHA-wide basis, and not to individual projects. This indicator is not applicable to PHAs that choose not to participate in the Capital Fund program under section 9(d) of the Act.
( c ) *Capital Fund subindicators.* The subindicators pursuant to section 9(d) of the Act are: ( 1 ) Timeliness of fund obligation. This subindicator examines the period of time it takes for a PHA to obligate funds from the Capital Fund program under section 9(j)(1) of the 1937 Act (42 U.S.C. 1437g(9)(j)).
( 2 ) Occupancy rate. This subindicator measures the PHA's occupancy rate as of the end of the PHA's fiscal year.
( d ) *Method of assessment.* The assessment required under the Capital Fund program indicator will be performed through analysis of obligated amounts in HUD's eLOCCS (or its successor) for all Capital Fund program grants that were open during the assessed fiscal year. This subindicator measures a statutory requirement for the Capital Fund program. Other aspects of the Capital Fund program will be monitored by HUD through other types of reviews, and in this indicator through considering occupancy rates. ( 1 ) PHAs are responsible to ensure that their Capital Fund program information is submitted to eLOCCS by the submission due date.
( 2 ) A PHA may not appeal its PHAS score, Capital Fund program score, or both, based on the fact that it did not submit its Capital Fund program information to eLOCCS and/or the PIC systems by the submission due date.