alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  report on Form 10KSB of ATEL Capital  Equipment
Fund XI, LP, (the  "Company")  for the period  ended  December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
and  pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I, Paritosh K. Choksi,  Chief Financial  Officer of
ATEL Financial  Services,  LLC,  managing member of the Company,  hereby certify
that:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:     3/29/2005



/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi
------------------------------
Paritosh K. Choksi
Executive Vice President of Managing
Member, Principal financial officer of registrant
Exhibit 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Chambers Street Properties’ Registration Statement No. 333-192137 on Form S-3 and in Registration Statement No. 333-189694 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 30, 2015, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Goodman Princeton Holdings (Lux) S.à.r.l. and subsidiaries as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Chambers Street Properties for the year ended December 31, 2014.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Los Angeles, CA


March 30, 2015
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 3 - 03 83 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 3 - CE - 0 0 8 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
§ 232.615 Eligible borrowers. ( a ) In order to be eligible as a borrower under this subpart the applicant shall be a profit or non-profit entity, which owns a nursing home or intermediate care facility for which the Secretary of Health and Human Services has determined that the installation of fire safety equipment in such facility is necessary to meet the applicable requirements of the Secretary of Health and Human Services for providers of services under Title XVIII and Title XIX of the Social Security Act and that upon completion of the installation of such equipment the nursing home or intermediate care facility will meet the applicable fire safety requirements of HHS. Until the termination of all obligations of the Commissioner under an insurance contract under this subpart and during such further period of time as the Commissioner shall be the owner, holder, or reinsurer of the loan, the borrower shall be regulated or restricted by the Commissioner as to methods of operation including requirements for maintenance of fire safety equipment.
( b ) Also eligible as a borrower shall be a profit or nonprofit entity which owns an assisted living facility or board and care home for which HUD has determined that the installation of fire safety equipment is approvable under the definition contained in § 232.500(c).
[39 FR 28966, Aug. 12, 1974; 39 FR 30349, Aug. 22, 1974, as amended at 50 FR 37523, Sept. 16, 1985; 59 FR 61228, Nov. 29, 1994; 80 FR 48028, Aug. 11, 2015]
§ 1218.53 Recoupment of overpayments on Indian mineral leases. ( a ) Whenever an overpayment is made under an Indian oil and gas lease, a payor may recoup the overpayment through a recoupment on Form ONRR-2014 against the current month's royalties or other revenues owed on the same lease. However, for any month a payor may not recoup more than 50 percent of the royalties or other revenues owed in that month under an individual allotted lease or more than 100 percent of the royalties or other revenues owed in that month under a tribal lease.
( b ) With written permission authorized by tribal statute or resolution, a payor may recoup an overpayment against royalties or other revenues owed in that month under other leases for which that tribe is the lessor. A copy of the tribe's written permission must be furnished to ONRR pursuant to instructions for reporting recoupments in the ONRR revenue reporter handbook. See part 1210 of this chapter. Recouping overpayments on one allotted lease from royalties paid to another allotted lease is specifically prohibited.
( c ) Overpayments subject to recoupment under this section include all payments made in excess of the required payment for royalty, rental, bonus, or other amounts owed as specified by statute, regulation, order, or terms of an Indian mineral lease.
( d ) The ONRR Director or his/her designee may order any payor to not recoup any amount for such reasonable period of time as may be necessary for ONRR to review the nature and amount of any claimed overpayment.
[60 FR 3087, Jan. 13, 1995, as amended at 67 FR 19112, Apr. 18, 2002]
### §9. Subsidized companies required to construct and operate lines

All railroad and telegraph companies to which the United States has granted any subsidy in lands or bonds or loan of credit for the construction of either railroad or telegraph lines, which, by the acts incorporating them, or by any act amendatory or supplementary thereto, are required to construct, maintain, or operate telegraph lines, and all companies engaged in operating said railroad or telegraph lines shall, by and through their own respective corporate officers and employees, maintain, and operate, for railroad, governmental, commercial, and all other purposes, telegraph lines, and exercise by themselves alone all the telegraph franchises conferred upon them and obligations assumed by them under the acts making the grants as aforesaid.

(Aug. 7, 1888, ch. 772, §1, 25 Stat. 382.)
5-1 Plan Evaluation/Adaptive Management 

CHAPTER 5 

PLAN EVALUATION/ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT 

PLAN EVALUATION 

Periodic evaluations of the Kasha-Katuwe Tent 

Rocks RMP will occur at a minimum of every 

five years. The purpose of these evaluations is 

to determine whether: 

• Decisions remain relevant to current issues. 

• Decisions are effective in achieving or 

progressing towards desired outcomes. 

• Any decisions need to be revised. 

• Any decisions need to be dropped from 

further consideration. 

• Any areas require new decisions. 

BLM’s Land Use Planning Handbook provides 

recommendations for the process for completing 

plan evaluations and guidance on determining 

when a decision should be modified, dropped, or 

added. The first evaluation should review both 

implementation of the Plan and the effectiveness 

of monitoring, to the extent that they are 

available. 

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT 

Adaptive management is defined by the Office 

of Environmental Policy and Compliance as: 

“...a system of management practices based on 

clearly identified outcomes, monitoring to 

determine if management actions are meeting 

outcomes, and if not, facilitating management 

changes that will best ensure that outcomes are 

met or to reevaluate the outcomes.” The 

monitoring and plan evaluation efforts 

associated with this RMP will contribute to the 

continual assessment of management objectives 

and actions in the Kasha-Katuwe Tent Rocks 

Planning Area. The BLM will continue to work 

closely with the Pueblo de Cochiti to ensure 

adequate communication and cooperation on 

resource management and to share information 

on resource conditions. Adaptive management 

is especially important at Kasha-Katuwe Tent 

Rocks National Monument, where recreation 

activities and visitor use are increasing, 

requiring management flexibility over the life of 

the RMP.
### §8105. Fishing vessel exemption

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, neither the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978, nor any amendment to such convention, shall apply to a fishing vessel, including a fishing vessel used as a fish tender vessel.

(Added Pub. L. 104–324, title XI, §1146(a), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3992.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 8105, Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 550, authorized Secretary to prescribe regulations to carry out this part prior to repeal by Pub. L. 101–595, title VI, §603(7)(A), Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2993.
EXHIBIT NUMBER 11

             INFORMATION MANAGEMENT RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
               (Unaudited and in thousands except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                  Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
                                                     September 30,       September 30,
                                                   -----------------   -----------------
                                                   1996(1)     1997    1996(1)     1997 
                                                   -------   -------   -------   -------
<S>                                                <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>    

Net income .....................................   $   591   $ 3,465   $ 1,535   $ 7,374
                                                   =======   =======   =======   =======

Shares:
   Weighted average number of common shares
      outstanding ..............................     9,606    16,472     9,606    15,688
   Assuming conversion of options issued and
      outstanding ..............................     7,277     7,017     7,398     6,933
                                                   -------   -------   -------   -------

   Weighted average common and
      common stock equivalent shares outstanding    16,883    23,489    17,004    22,621
                                                   =======   =======   =======   =======

Net income per share............................     $0.03     $0.15     $0.09     $0.33
                                                     =====     =====     =====     =====



(1)   Net income and net income per share have been presented on a pro forma basis as if
      the  Company  had been fully  subject to federal  and state  income  taxes for all
      periods presented.

</TABLE>




















                                      17
§ 960.208 Notification to applicants. ( a ) The PHA must promptly notify any applicant determined to be ineligible for admission to a project of the basis for such determination, and must provide the applicant upon request, within a reasonable time after the determination is made, with an opportunity for an informal hearing on such determination.
( b ) When a determination has been made that an applicant is eligible and satisfies all requirements for admission, including the tenant selection criteria, the applicant must be notified of the approximate date of occupancy insofar as that date can be reasonably determined.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Hunter, Appellant.

Motion for leave to prosecute appeal as a poor person granted. The appeal may be perfected upon one typewritten copy of the record and five typewritten copies of the brief. Motion for extension of time within which to perfect appeal granted and time is extended for 90 days. Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Andrew W. Pinckney, Esq., attorney at law, 90 State Street, Albany, New York, is hereby assigned as counsel for appellant. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
#### Harry Dinnerstein, as Trustee, v. Norman I. Schaeler. Norman I. Schaeler v. Sam J. Levin et al.

Motion for a stay granted on condition that the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before May 3,1962, with notice of argument for May 15, 1962, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
#### SOMMER, Appellant, v. SOMMER et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 13, 1903.)

Action by Helena Sommer against Frederick W. Sommer and others.

No opinion. Motion denied.
§ 1227.802 How will ONRR terminate a State's delegation agreement? This section explains the procedures ONRR will use to terminate all or a part of your delegation agreement: ( a ) ONRR will notify you in writing that it is initiating procedures to terminate your delegation agreement;
( b ) ONRR will provide you notice and opportunity for a hearing under § 1227.803 of this part;
( c ) The ONRR Director, with concurrence from the Secretary, will decide whether to terminate your delegation agreement.
( d ) After the hearing, ONRR may: ( 1 ) Terminate your delegation agreement; or
( 2 ) Allow you 30 days to correct any remaining deficiencies. If you do not correct the deficiency within 30 days, ONRR will terminate all or a part of your delegation agreement.
( e ) ONRR will determine the date your agreement is terminated and will notify you of that date in writing. ONRR will determine the termination date based on the number of delegated functions and the impact of the termination on all affected parties.
### §162. Additional research authorities of the FCC

In order to carry out the purposes of this chapter, the Commission may—

(1) undertake research and development work in connection with any matter in relation to which the Commission has jurisdiction; and

(2) promote the carrying out of such research and development by others, or otherwise to arrange for such research and development to be carried out by others.

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title I, §12, as added Pub. L. 111–358, title VIII, §803, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 4043.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, 48 Stat. 1064, known as the Communications Act of 1934, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 609 of this title and Tables.
Exhibit 99.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September  30, 2002 (the “Report”) of Pinnacle Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies that to the best of my knowledge:

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

/s/ Robert B. Nolen, Jr.                                           

Robert B. Nolen, Jr, Chief Executive Officer and

 Chief Financial Officer

November 14, 2002                                                  

(Date)
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of China
Finance Online Co. Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as amended by this Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Jeff Wang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                               
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2012
|                     | 
|By:                  |  | /s/ Jeff Wang                 
|                     |  | Name: Jeff Wang               
|                     |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 1228.100 Entering into an agreement. ( a ) A State or Indian tribe may request the Department to enter into a cooperative agreement by sending a letter from the governor, tribal chairman, or other appropriate official with delegation authority, to the Director of ONRR.
( b ) The request for an agreement shall be in a format prescribed by ONRR and should include at a minimum the following information: ( 1 ) Type of eligible activities to be undertaken.
( 2 ) Proposed term of the agreement.
( 3 ) Evidence that the State or Indian tribe meets, or can meet by the time the agreement is in effect, the standards established by the Secretary for the types of activities to be conducted under the terms of the agreement.
( 4 ) If the State is proposing to undertake activities on Indian lands located within the State, a resolution from the appropriate tribal council indicating their agreement to delegate to the State responsibilities under the terms of the cooperative agreement for activities to be conducted on tribal or allotted land.
( c ) The eligible activities to be conducted under the terms of a cooperative agreement may be funded or unfunded by the Department. See § 1228.105 of this subpart for funding of cooperative agreements.
[49 FR 37348, Sept. 21, 1984, as amended at 56 FR 10512, Mar. 13, 1991]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual report on Form 10-KSB of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund XI, LLC, (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Dean L. Cash, President and Chief Executive
Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby certify that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 17, 2007                                                                     
|                                                                                       
|/s/ Dean L. Cash                                                                       
|Dean L. Cash                                                                           
|President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial
Services, LLC (Managing Member)
§ 15.32 Tolerances for weight of explosive, sheath, wrapper, and specific gravity. ( a ) The weight of the explosive, the sheath, and the outer covering shall each be within ±7.5 percent of that specified in the approval.
( b ) The ratio of the weight of the sheath to that of the explosive shall be within ±7.5 percent of that specified in the approval.
( c ) The specific gravity of the explosive and sheath shall be within ±7.5 percent of that specified in the approval.
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION

FOR REINSTATEMENT OF KAMAH

MENSELEH GUEH

- THORONKA TO

THE BAR OF MARYLAND *

*

*

*

*

* IN THE

COURT OF APPEALS

OF MARYLAND

Misc. Docket AG No. 95

September Term, 202 1

ORDER

Upon consideration of Kamah Menseleh Gueh

- Thoronka’s Verified Petition for

Reinstatement, Bar Counsel ’s response to the petition

, and Petitioner’s “Motion for

Petition for Reinstatement to be Granted Without a Hearing, ” it is this 18th day of

November 20 22, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring,

ORDERED by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the court

concurring, that the Pe tition is, GRANTED ; and it is further

ORDERED that Kamah Menseleh Gueh

- Thoronka is reinstated as a member of the

Bar of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that

, the Clerk of the Court shall replace the name Kamah Menseleh

Gueh

- Thoronka upon the register of attorneys entitled to practice law in this State and

certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial

tribunals in this State.

/s/ Matthew J. Fader
Chief Judge
§ 960.200 Purpose. ( a ) This subpart states HUD eligibility and selection requirements for admission to public housing.
( b ) See also related HUD regulations in this title concerning these subjects: ( 1 ) 1937 Act definitions: part 5, subpart D;
( 2 ) Restrictions on assistance to noncitizens: part 5, subpart E;
( 3 ) Family income and family payment: part 5, subpart F;
( 4 ) Public housing agency plans: part 903;
( 5 ) Rent and reexamination: part 960, subpart C;
( 6 ) Mixed population developments: part 960, subpart D;
( 7 ) Occupancy by over-income families or police officers: part 960, subpart E.
( 8 ) Protection for victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking, 24 CFR part 5, subpart L (Protection for Victims of Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, or Stalking).
[66 FR 28799, May 24, 2001, as amended at 73 FR 72344, Nov. 28, 2008; 75 FR 66262, Oct. 27, 2010; 81 FR 80815, Nov. 16, 2016]