alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §51102. Definitions

In this part:

(1) Academy.—The term "Academy" means the United States Merchant Marine Academy located at Kings Point, New York, and maintained under chapter 513 of this title.

(2) Cost of education provided.—The term "cost of education provided" means the financial costs incurred by the United States Government for providing training or financial assistance to students at the Academy and the State maritime academies, including direct financial assistance, room, board, classroom academics, and other training activities.

(3) Merchant marine officer.—The term "merchant marine officer" means an individual issued a license by the Coast Guard authorizing service as—

(A) a master, mate, or pilot on a documented vessel that—

(i) is of at least 1,000 gross tons as measured under section 14502 of this title or an alternate tonnage measured under section 14302 of this title as prescribed by the Secretary under section 14104 of this title; and

(ii) operates on the oceans or the Great Lakes; or

(B) an engineer officer on a documented vessel propelled by machinery of at least 4,000 horsepower.

(4) State maritime academy.—The term "State maritime academy" means—

(A) a State maritime academy or college sponsored by a State and assisted under chapter 515 of this title; and

(B) a regional maritime academy or college sponsored by a group of States and assisted under chapter 515 of this title.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(b), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1568.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 51102 | 46 App.:1295a. | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title XIII, §1302, as added Pub. L. 96–453, §2, Oct. 15, 1980, 94 Stat. 1997; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(143), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 166; Pub. L. 104–324, title VII, §708, Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3934; Pub. L. 108–136, title XXXV, §3515(a), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1792. |

Section

The definition of "Secretary" is omitted as unnecessary because the full title is used the first time the term appears in each section.

In the definition of "merchant marine office", the words "documented vessel" are substituted for "vessel . . . which is documented under the laws of the United States" because of the definition of "documented vessel" in 46 U.S.C. 2101, which is being moved to chapter 1 of the revised title.

In the definition of "State maritime academy", the words "or territory of the United States" and "or territories of the United States" are omitted as unnecessary because of the definition of "State" in chapter 1 of the revised title.
Editorial Note on Part 982
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999, and at 89 FR 38293, May 7, 2024.

§ 982.202 How applicants are selected: General requirements. ( a ) *Waiting list admissions and special admissions.* The PHA may admit an applicant for participation in the program either: ( 1 ) As a special admission (see § 982.203).
( 2 ) As a waiting list admission (see § 982.204 through § 982.210).
( b ) *Prohibited admission criteria* — ( 1 ) *Where family lives.* Admission to the program may not be based on where the family lives before admission to the program. However, the PHA may target assistance for families who live in public housing or other federally assisted housing, or may adopt a residency preference (see § 982.207).
( 2 ) *Where family will live.* Admission to the program may not be based on where the family will live with assistance under the program.
( 3 ) *Family characteristics.* The PHA preference system may provide a preference for admission of families with certain characteristics from the PHA waiting list. However, admission to the program may not be based on: ( i ) Discrimination because members of the family are unwed parents, recipients of public assistance, or children born out of wedlock;
( ii ) Discrimination because a family includes children (familial status discrimination);
( iii ) Discrimination because of age, race, color, religion, sex, or national origin;
( iv ) Discrimination because of disability; or
( v ) Whether a family decides to participate in a family self-sufficiency program.
( c ) *Applicant status.* An applicant does not have any right or entitlement to be listed on the PHA waiting list, to any particular position on the waiting list, or to admission to the programs. The preceding sentence does not affect or prejudice any right, independent of this rule, to bring a judicial action challenging an PHA violation of a constitutional or statutory requirement.
( d ) *Admission policy.* The PHA must admit applicants for participation in accordance with HUD regulations and other requirements, including, but not limited to, 24 CFR part 5, subpart L (Protection for Victims of Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, or Stalking), and with PHA policies stated in the PHA Administrative Plan and the PHA plan. The PHA admission policy must state the system of admission preferences that the PHA uses to select applicants from the waiting list, including any residency preference or other local preference.
[59 FR 36682, July 18, 1994, as amended at 60 FR 34717, July 3, 1995; 61 FR 9048, Mar. 6, 1996; 61 FR 27163, May 30, 1996; 64 FR 26643, May 14, 1999; 65 FR 16821, Mar. 30, 2000; 73 FR 72344, Nov. 28, 2008; 75 FR 66263, Oct. 27, 2010; 81 FR 80816, Nov. 16, 2016]
|   | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Tengion, Inc.; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |
|--------|
|   | /s/ A. Brian Davis |
|   | A. Brian Davis |
|   | Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Finance |

----
§ 883.606 Administration fee. ( a ) The State Agency is responsible for administration of the Contract subject to periodic review and audit by HUD.
( b ) The Agency is entitled to a reasonable fee, determined by HUD, for administering a Contract on newly constructed or substantially rehabilitated units provided there is no override on the permanent loan granted by the Agency to the owner for a project containing assisted units.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED September 15, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-20816 Summary Calendar

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DONNA ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant, ROBERT HEDRICK, Intervenor DefendantAppellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CV-1974

-------------------- Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appellee’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction appeal of district court’s remand order and ostensible appeals of any other orders, other than that granting Appellee’s motion for sanctions and statutory fees, is GRANTED. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d); see also Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Mottley , 211 U.S. 149, 150-53 (1908) (plaintiff, not defendant, controlsNo. 05-20816 -2- removability of case); Sitton v. United States , 413 F.2d 1386, 1389 (5th Cir. 1969) (federal courts do not act as appellate arm of state courts). The district court’s sanctions order against Appellants,under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, which granted nonmonetary relief and, based on fees incurred by Appellee during its two prior successful remands, $10,750, was not an abuse of discretion and is AFFIRMED. See Skidmore Energy, Inc. v. KPMG , 455 F.3d 564, 566 (5th Cir. 2006). To the extent Appellants appeal the court’s award of $7,031.25 in statutory fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), that award was also not an abuse of discretion and is AFFIRMED. See Hornbuckle v. State Farm Lloyds , 385 F.3d 538, 541 (5th Cir. 2004). Appellee’s motion for costs on appeal and motion, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 38, for damages in the amount of fees incurred in defending this appeal are GRANTED and the matter REMANDED to the district court for determination of such (single) costs and fees incurred in defending this appeal. See Lyons v. Sheetz , 834 F.2d 493, 495-96 (5th Cir. 1987); Clark
v. Green , 814 F.2d 221, 223 (5th Cir. 1987) (explaining that even
pro se litigants lack “unrestrained license to pursue totally frivolous appeals”). Appellants’ motion for $20,000 in sanctions against Appellee, motion to turn the appeal over to the FBI for investigation of allegations of conspiracy between employees ofNo. 05-20816 -3- this Court and Appellee, and motion to continue all actions pending the outcome of that investigation are DENIED. Finally, we warn Appellants that additional frivolous pleadings, suits, or appeals filed by them in this matter will invite further sanctions. It is time for the underlying case to proceed in state court.
### §85. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, acts Mar. 3, 1887, ch. 362, 24 Stat. 526; Oct. 28, 1921, ch. 114, §1, 42 Stat. 208; Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 462, 43 Stat. 1145; May 21, 1928, ch. 661, 45 Stat. 684, which required all fees collected by registers which would increase their salaries beyond a certain amount to be covered into the Treasury, except for certain clerical fees, was superseded by sections 79c and 79d of this title, which require all fees to be covered into the Treasury.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the report) for the purpose of complying with
Rule 13a14(b) or Rule 15d14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Ray C. Dillon, the Chief Executive Officer, and Kenneth D. Mann, the Chief Financial Officer, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Deltic Timber Corporation.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Ray C. DillonRay C. DillonChief Executive OfficerMay 6, 2008/s/ Kenneth D. MannKenneth D. MannChief Financial OfficerMay 6, 2008
#### Abe Solomon v. Greater New York Association, Inc.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.
### §2910. Preservation of Freedmen's Bureau records

The Archivist shall preserve the records of the Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Lands, commonly referred to as the "Freedmen's Bureau", by using—

(1) microfilm technology for preservation of the documents comprising these records so that they can be maintained for future generations; and

(2) the results of the pilot project with the University of Florida to create future partnerships with Howard University and other institutions for the purposes of indexing these records and making them more easily accessible to the public, including historians, genealogists, and students, and for any other purposes determined by the Archivist.

(Added Pub. L. 106–444, §2(a), Nov. 6, 2000, 114 Stat. 1929.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2910, Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1297, provided for final authority of Administrator in records practices, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 94–575, §2(a)(4), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2726.
### §46108. Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to the Federal Maritime Commission $32,869,000 for fiscal year 2022, $38,260,000 for fiscal year 2023, $43,720,000 for fiscal year 2024, and $49,200,000 for fiscal year 2025 for the activities of the Commission authorized under this chapter and subtitle IV.

(Added Pub. L. 114–120, title IV, §401(a), Feb. 8, 2016, 130 Stat. 67, §308; amended Pub. L. 115–282, title VII, §702, Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4294; renumbered §46108 and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXVI [LXXXVI], §§8602, 8605(a)(3), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4761, 4765; Pub. L. 117–146, §26, June 16, 2022, 136 Stat. 1286.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–146 substituted "$32,869,000 for fiscal year 2022, $38,260,000 for fiscal year 2023, $43,720,000 for fiscal year 2024, and $49,200,000 for fiscal year 2025" for "$29,086,888 for fiscal year 2020 and $29,639,538 for fiscal year 2021".

2021—Pub. L. 116–283, §8605(a)(3), renumbered section 308 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 116–283, §8602, substituted "$29,086,888 for fiscal year 2020 and $29,639,538 for fiscal year 2021" for "$28,012,310 for fiscal year 2018 and $28,544,543 for fiscal year 2019".

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 substituted "$28,012,310 for fiscal year 2018 and $28,544,543 for fiscal year 2019" for "$24,700,000 for each of fiscal years 2016 and 2017".
### SUBCHAPTER VII—BROADBAND DATA
§ 93.203 HTF funds and public housing. ( a ) HTF funds may be used for new construction or rehabilitation of public housing units only in accordance with the following: ( 1 ) HTF funds may be used for new construction of public housing as part of the Choice Neighborhoods (Choice) program under a HUD appropriation act or for new public housing units that have been allocated and will receive low-income housing tax credits under section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 42).
( 2 ) HTF funds may be used for the rehabilitation of existing public housing units in which the public housing assistance will be converted and used at the properties under the Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) program under HUD's 2012 Appropriations Act (Pub. L. 112-55, 125 Stat. 552, approved November 18, 2011) or subsequent statutes. HTF funds may also be used for the rehabilitation of existing public housing under the Choice program, and of existing public housing units that have been allocated and will receive low-income housing tax credits under section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 42).
( b ) The public housing units constructed using funds under this part must replace units that were removed from a public housing agency's public housing inventory as part of a Choice program grant, or as part of a mixed-financed development under section 35 of the 1937 Act. The number of replacement units cannot be more than the number of units removed from the public housing agency's inventory. The public housing units constructed or rehabilitated using funds under this part must receive Public Housing Operating Fund assistance (and may receive Public Housing Capital Fund assistance) under section 9 of the 1937 Act. These units cannot receive operating costs assistance or operating cost assistance reserves under this part.
( c ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, HTF-assisted housing may not receive Operating Fund or Capital Fund assistance under section 9 of the 1937 Act during the HTF period of affordability.
( d ) Consistent with § 93.200(c), HTF funds may be used for affordable housing in a project that also contains public housing units, provided that the HTF funds are not used for the public housing units and HTF funds are used only for eligible costs, in accordance with this part.
### Reconnaissance for uranium in the central Tucano basin, Bahia, Brazil

By: D.D. Haynes

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1185B

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### §399b. Offering of certain services, facilities, or products by public broadcast station

#### (a) "Advertisement" defined

For purposes of this section, the term "advertisement" means any message or other programming material which is broadcast or otherwise transmitted in exchange for any remuneration, and which is intended—

(1) to promote any service, facility, or product offered by any person who is engaged in such offering for profit;

(2) to express the views of any person with respect to any matter of public importance or interest; or

(3) to support or oppose any candidate for political office.

#### (b) Offering of services, facilities, or products permitted; advertisements prohibited

(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), each public broadcast station shall be authorized to engage in the offering of services, facilities, or products in exchange for remuneration.

(2) No public broadcast station may make its facilities available to any person for the broadcasting of any advertisement.

#### (c) Use of funds from offering services, etc.

Any public broadcast station which engages in any offering specified in subsection (b)(1) may not use any funds distributed by the Corporation under section 396(k) of this title to defray any costs associated with such offering. Any such offering by a public broadcast station shall not interfere with the provision of public telecommunications services by such station.

#### (d) Development of accounting system

Each public broadcast station which engages in the activity specified in subsection (b)(1) shall, in consultation with the Corporation, develop an accounting system which is designed to identify any amounts received as remuneration for, or costs related to, such activities under this section, and to account for such amounts separately from any other amounts received by such station from any source.

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title III, §399B, as added Pub. L. 97–35, title XII, §1231, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 731.)
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted), Joseph Y. Liu, Chief Executive Officer of Oplink
Communications, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:

1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "QUARTERLY
REPORT") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition at the end of the period covered by
the Quarterly Report and results of operations of the Company for the periods
covered by the Quarterly Report.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hands hereto as of the 11th day
of May, 2004.

/s/ Joseph Y. Liu
---------------------------------
Joseph Y. Liu
Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Mildred Brandes, Respondent, against Mohawk Carpet Mills, Inc., et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Decedent had for some years before his death been employed as a night watchman in a carpet mill. Since December 30, 1953 he had been suffering from heart disease but continued to work. This involved climbing a number of stairs. On July 29, 1954 it was established that he was required to climb a number of *“*flights of stairs ” each hour during his eight-hour day and descend the stairs, walk a distance of half a mile and punch time clocks at 10 different stations. While he was climbing stairs on the third trip, having climbed 22 flights in the previous 2*4 hours he suffered a heart attack, fell down the stairs, and struck his head. He died some time later from coronary thrombosis; and there is medical proof of the existence of a consequential train of events from the fall on the stairs to decedent’s death. The main argument of appellants is that there was here no “accident” within the statutory definition; but there is proof that the arduous work of the night of July 29 in its effect on decedent’s weakened heart was a contributory cause of the heart attack manifested by his fall and of his subsequent death. Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.