alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,248,146
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         198,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             3,946,632
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 12,244,643
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     12,225,722
<ALLOWANCE>                                    154,544
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,507,693
<DEPOSITS>                                  22,561,448
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            184,427
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,753,818
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              30,507,693
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                552,813
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              277,296
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               109,198
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               939,307
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             385,699
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             385,699
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          553,608
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   54,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              15,330
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                520,951
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 77,529
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      77,529
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    77,529
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.63
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               101,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    5,000
<RECOVERIES>                                     5,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              155,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           155,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark L. Lana, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer, and
director of HS3 Technologies Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of HS3 Technologies Inc.
      for the year ended June 30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of HS3 Technologies Inc.                                                           

Dated: September 18, 2009

/s/ Mark Lana
  Mark L. LanaChief Executive
Officer, Treasurer, and Director(Principal Financial Officer)HS3
Technologies Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to HS3 Technologies
Inc. and will be retained by HS3 Technologies Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
§ 1204.206 What will ONRR do when it receives my request for other relief? When ONRR receives your request for other relief under § 1204.205(b), it will notify you in writing as follows: ( a ) If your request for relief is complete, ONRR may either approve, deny, or modify your request in writing after consultation with any State required under § 1204.207(b). ( 1 ) If ONRR approves your request for relief, ONRR will notify you of the effective date of your accounting or auditing relief and other specifics of the relief approved.
( 2 ) If ONRR denies your relief request, ONRR will notify you of the reasons for denial and your appeal rights under § 1204.6.
( 3 ) If ONRR modifies your relief request, ONRR will notify you of the modifications. ( i ) You have 60 days from your receipt of ONRR's notice to either accept or reject any modification(s) in writing.
( ii ) If you reject the modification(s) or fail to respond to ONRR's notice, ONRR will deny your relief request. ONRR will notify you in writing of the reasons for denial and your appeal rights under § 1204.6.
( b ) If your request for relief is not complete, ONRR will notify you in writing that your request is incomplete and identify any missing information. ( 1 ) You must submit the missing information within 60 days of your receipt of ONRR's notice that your request is incomplete.
( 2 ) After you submit all required information, ONRR may approve, deny, or modify your request for relief under paragraph (a) of this section.
( 3 ) If you do not submit all required information within 60 days of your receipt of ONRR's notice that your request is incomplete, ONRR will deny your relief request. ONRR will notify you in writing of the reasons for denial and your appeal rights under § 1204.6.
( 4 ) You may submit a new request for relief under this subpart at any time after ONRR returns your incomplete request.
[69 FR 55088, Sept. 13, 2004, as amended at 78 FR 30200, May 22, 2013]
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.3


                                                                    PO Box 84013
                                                          Columbus GA 31908-4013
                                                               Tel. 800.784.5566

                                                      [GREENPOINT MORTGAGE LOGO]



TO: RWT HOLDINGS, INC.

     Re: Annual Statement as to Compliance by the Seller

     Pursuant to Section 6.04 of the Mortgage Loan Flow Purchase, Sale, and
Servicing Agreement between GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. as Seller (the
"Seller") and RWT Holdings, Inc. as Purchaser, dated as of August 1, 2002 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned officer of the Seller, hereby certifies as to the
following:

          (i) a review of the activities of the Seller during the calendar year
     ended December 31, 2004 (the "Applicable Period") and of the Seller's
     performance under the Agreement has been made under the direct supervision
     of the undersigned officer; and

          (ii) to the best knowledge of the undersigned officer, based on such
     review, the Seller has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement
     throughout the Applicable Period, and there has been no known default in
     the fulfillment of the Seller's obligations throughout such Applicable
     Period.


                                        Very Truly Yours

                                        GREENPOINT MORTGAGE
                                        FUNDING, INC.
                                        as Seller

                                        /s/ Roy Briggs
                                        -----------------------
                                        Name: Roy Briggs
                                        Title: Vice President




                AVISO IMPORTANTE PARA LAS PERSONAS HABLA ESPANOL
            Si usted no entiendo el contenido de esta carta por favor
                      obtonga una traduccion immediamente
       -----------------------------------------------------------------
                 2300 BROOKSTONE CENTRE PKWY  COLUMBUS GA 31904
      CUSTOMER SERVICE HOURS: MONDAY - FRIDAY, 8:30 AM - 8:00 PM, EASTERN
                           WWW.GREENPOINTSERVICE.COM
#### Matthew P. Brady, appellant, v. Revere Motors Sales Company, appellee.

Gen. No. 27,957.

Motion under section 89 of the Practice Act to vacate a judgment in assumpsit for attorney’s fees. Motion sustained. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Franklin J. Stransky, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1922.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Opinion filed July 9, 1923.

*Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Harry S. Mecartney, for appellant. Willis Melville and Russell B. Burt, for appellee; W. S. Johnson, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Johnston

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenny Taylor, Also Known as Reggie Brown, Appellant.

[832 NYS2d 437]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barbara F. Newman, J.), rendered June 22, 2006, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted robbery in the third degree and menacing in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of IV2 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility, including its evaluation of inconsistencies in testimony *(see People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]).

The court properly exercised its discretion in directing that *374defendant’s sentence be served consecutively to his sentence for an unrelated conviction, and we perceive no basis for directing otherwise. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli, Williams and Catterson, JJ.
### NUMBER S 13

- 2 2

- 00 440

- CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

JOSHUA POWELL

, A ppellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, A ppellee

.

On a ppeal from the 347th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.



### ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Tijerina, and Peña

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on appellant’s motion to access state’s exhibits six

and seven

. The court reporter was unable to make digital copies of state’s exhibits

number six and seven; therefore, the original state’s exhibits number six and seven were

provided to the Court

.

Accordingly, appellant’s motion is granted. Appellant’s counsel should mak e2 arrangements with the Clerk of the Court to view the original exhibits

.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the

15th day of February , 202 3

.
§ 1210.102 What production reports must I submit? ( a ) Form ONRR-4054, Oil and Gas Operations Report. If you operate a Federal or Indian onshore or OCS oil and gas lease or federally approved unit or communitization agreement that contains one or more wells that are not permanently plugged or abandoned, you must submit Form ONRR-4054 to ONRR: ( 1 ) You must submit Form ONRR-4054 for each well for each calendar month, beginning with the month in which you complete drilling, unless: ( i ) You have only test production from a drilling well; or
( ii ) The ONRR tells you in writing to report differently.
( 2 ) You must continue reporting until: ( i ) The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) or ONRR approves all wells as permanently plugged or abandoned or the lease or unit or communitization agreement is terminated; and
( ii ) You dispose of all inventory.
( b ) Form ONRR-4058, Production Allocation Schedule Report. If you operate an offshore facility measurement point (FMP) handling production from a Federal oil and gas lease or federally approved unit agreement that is commingled (with approval) with production from any other source prior to measurement for royalty determination, you must file Form ONRR-4058. ( 1 ) You must submit Form ONRR-4058 for each calendar month beginning with the month in which you first handle production covered by this section.
( 2 ) Form ONRR-4058 is not required whenever all of the following conditions are met: ( i ) All leases involved are Federal leases;
( ii ) All leases have the same fixed royalty rate;
( iii ) All leases are operated by the same operator;
( iv ) The facility measurement device is operated by the same person as the leases/agreements;
( v ) Production has not been previously measured for royalty determination; and
( vi ) The production is not subsequently commingled and measured for royalty determination at an FMP for which Form ONRR-4058 is required under this part.
Exhibit 13.2
 
 PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
 
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 
 
 In connection with this Annual Report of Top Ships Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alexandros Tsirikos, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
 
 Date: April 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 /s/ Alexandros Tsirikos
 Alexandros Tsirikos
 Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
DISMISS; Opinion issued March 28, 2013

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-12-00425-CV

WILSON AND JANICE JONES AND ALL OCCUPANTS OF

610 N. SILVER CREEK DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellants

V.

VRM (VENDOR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT), DULY AUTHORIZED

AGENT FOR THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-11-08796-C

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, FitzGerald, and Myers 

The Court has before it appellee’s March 1, 2013 motion to dismiss appeal as moot, 

which is unopposed. We GRANT the motion and DISMISS the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(2).

PER CURIAM

120425F.P05
–2–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

WILSON AND JANICE JONES, AND ALL 

OCCUPANTS OF 610 N. SILVER CREEK 

DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellants

No. 05-12-00425-CV V.

VRM (VENDOR RESOURCE 

MANAGEMENT), DULY AUTHORIZED 

AGENT FOR THE SECRETARY OF 

VETERANS AFFAIRS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 3, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-11-08796-C.

Opinion delivered per curiam before Justices 

Bridges, FitzGerald and Myers.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee VRM (VENDOR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT), DULY 

AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS recover its costs 

of this appeal from appellants WILSON AND JANICE JONES, AND ALL OCCUPANTS OF 

610 N. SILVER CREEK DALLAS, TEXAS.

Judgment entered March 28, 2013.

/David L. Bridges/

DAVID L. BRIDGES

JUSTICE
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn efficient sparse matrix multiplication scheme for the CYBER 205 computerThis paper describes the development of an efficient algorithm for computing the product of a matrix and vector on a CYBER 205 vector computer. The desire to provide software which allows the user to choose between the often conflicting goals of minimizing central processing unit (CPU) time or storage requirements has led to a diagonal-based algorithm in which one of four types of storage is selected for each diagonal. The candidate storage types employed were chosen to be efficient on the CYBER 205 for diagonals which have nonzero structure which is dense, moderately sparse, very sparse and short, or very sparse and long; however, for many densities, no diagonal type is most efficient with respect to both resource requirements, and a trade-off must be made. For each diagonal, an initialization subroutine estimates the CPU time and storage required for each storage type based on results from previously performed numerical experimentation. These requirements are adjusted by weights provided by the user which reflect the relative importance the user places on the two resources. The adjusted resource requirements are then compared to select the most efficient storage and computational scheme.Document ID19880008918Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsLambiotte, Jules J., Jr.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1988Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberL-16403NASA-TM-4028NAS 1.15:4028Accession Number88N18302Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-90-21-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19880008918.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
---



##### 



ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS
    
    
    3ARTICLE 2. SECURITIES INVESTMENT AND CONSULTANCY
INFORMATION AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT
    
    
    3ARTICLE 3. TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICE FEE
    
    
    4ARTICLE 4. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
    
    
    4ARTICLE 5. CONFIDENTIALITY
    
    
    4ARTICLE 6. GOVERNING LAW AND EVENTS OF DEFAULT
    
    
    4ARTICLE 7. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
    
    
    5ARTICLE 8. EFFECTIVENESS
    
    
    5ARTICLE 9. NO SUBSEQUENT OBLIGATION
    
    
    5ARTICLE 10. TRANSFER LIMITATION
    
    
    5ARTICLE 11. AMENDMENT
    
    
    5ARTICLE 12. COUNTERPARTS
    
    
    5ARTICLE 13. MISCELLANEOUS
    
    
    5EXHIBIT 1 CONTENT OF THE TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES
    
    
    7EXHIBIT 2 TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICE FEE
    
    
    8




---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



#####
#### § 1217.250 Audits.

An audit of the lessee's accounts and books may be made annually or at such other times as may be directed by the mining supervisor, by certified public accountants, and at the expense of the lessee. The lessee shall furnish free of cost duplicate copies of such annual or other audits to the mining supervisor, within 30 days after the completion of each auditing.

[37 FR 11041, June 1, 1972. Redesignated at 48 FR 35641, Aug. 5, 1983]
Exhibit 4.151




---



##### 



Post Code: 100080
    
    Legal Representative: Jun WangTel: 58325305
    
    Fax: 58325300
 
 
 Post Code: 100081
    
    Legal Representative /Principal: Jia LiTel: 68484496
    
    Fax: 68703175
 
 Post Code: 100000
    
    Legal Representative /Principal: Wei XiongTel: 58325305
    
    Fax: 58325300
 
 The
Contract of Entrustment of Entrusted Loan
  Ö
  Ö




---



##### 



Ö
  st  nd  rd  th  th
    Ö




---



##### 



th
 Ö th
   Ö
    / /




---



##### 



Ö
 st  nd  rd  th  th
        th
  th




---



##### 








---



##### 



annual




---



##### 








---



##### 



/
  /
 /




---



##### 








---



##### 



Ö




---



##### 



Party A shall pay the service commission once a year at annual rate of 0.8% of the entrusted
loan, the first payment shall be on the loan release day
 
 o Ö
     One Two One
 unseverable
#### § 972.203 Definition of “conversion.”

For purposes of this subpart, the term “conversion” means the removal of public housing units from the inventory of a Public Housing Agency (PHA), and the provision of tenant-based, or project-based assistance for the residents of the public housing that is being removed. The term “conversion,” as used in this subpart, does not necessarily mean the physical removal of the public housing development from the site.
#### Modern Woodmen of America, on appeal of Anna G. Madary, appellant, v. Eliza J. Roy, appellee.

Gen. No. 28,478.

Interpleader granted benefit society in action for benefit under certificate of deceased member. Decree granting appellant amount expended by her in dues and premiums, also certain expenses, and on delivery within 30 days of deed to cemetery lot to appellee, a further sum paid therefor by appellant. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Hugo M. Friend, Judge, presiding. *601Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed October 2, 1923.

Wyman, Hopkins, McKeever & Colbert, for appellant; Vincent D. Wyman and Austin L. Wyman, of counsel. George A. Berry, Jr., and Edward G. Berglund, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §2117. Termination for unsafe operation

An individual authorized to enforce this title—

(1) may remove a certificate required by this title from a vessel that is operating in a condition that does not comply with the provisions of the certificate;

(2) may order the individual in charge of a vessel that is operating that does not have on board the certificate required by this title to return the vessel to a mooring and to remain there until the vessel is in compliance with this title; and

(3) may direct the individual in charge of a vessel to which this title applies to immediately take reasonable steps necessary for the safety of individuals on board the vessel if the official observes the vessel being operated in an unsafe condition that the official believes creates an especially hazardous condition, including ordering the individual in charge to return the vessel to a mooring and to remain there until the situation creating the hazard is corrected or ended.

(Added Pub. L. 111–281, title VI, §608(a), Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 2967.)
#### Wilhelmina Keebler, appellant, v. Joseph M. Weinstein, appellee.

Gen. No. 28,444.

Action for liquidated damages for holding over after expiration of lease, for removing garbage, etc., and for expenses in forcible detainer suit and costs. Judgment for defendant. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Arnold Heap, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed October 2, 1923.

Sabath & Stafford, for appellant; Charles B. Stafford, of counsel. Morris K. Levinson, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.