alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3285.306 Design procedures for concrete block piers. ( a ) *Frame piers less than 36 inches high.* ( 1 ) Frame piers less than 36 inches high are permitted to be constructed of single, open, or closed-cell concrete blocks, 8 inches “ 8 inches “ 16 inches, when the design capacity of the block is not exceeded.
( 2 ) The frame piers must be installed so that the long sides are at right angles to the supported I-beam, as shown in Figure A to this section.
( 3 ) The concrete blocks must be stacked with their hollow cells aligned vertically and must be positioned at right angles to the footings.
( 4 ) Horizontal offsets from the top to the bottom of the pier must not exceed one-half inch.
( 5 ) Mortar is not required, unless specified in the installation instructions or required by a registered professional engineer or registered architect.
( b ) *Frame piers 36 inches to 67 inches high and corner piers.* ( 1 ) All frame piers between 36 inches and 67 inches high and all corner piers over three blocks high must be constructed out of double, interlocked concrete blocks, as shown in Figure B to this section, when the design capacity of the block is not exceeded. Mortar is not required for concrete block piers, unless otherwise specified in the installation instructions or required by a professional engineer or registered architect.
( 2 ) Horizontal offsets from the top to the bottom of the pier must not exceed one inch.
( c ) *All piers over 67 inches high.* Piers over 67 inches high must be designed by a registered professional engineer or registered architect, in accordance with acceptable engineering practice. Mortar is not required for concrete block piers, unless otherwise specified in the manufacturer installation instructions or by the design.
Exhibit 31.01

I, Zorik Gordon, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
ReachLocal, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [paragraph omitted in accordance with Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)];

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Zorik Gordon       
|Zorik Gordon           
|Chief Executive Officer
|Date: March 28, 2011
#### Allen J. Polvino, Individually and on Behalf of All Other People Similarly Situated, Respondent, v Edwin A. Foster et al., Individually and as Monroe County Legislators, et al., Appellants.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Judgment affirmed, without costs. All concur, except Hancock, Jr., and Denman, JJ. who dissent and vote to reverse the judgment and dismiss the petition. Same memorandum and dissenting memorandum as in *Morin v Foster*(61 AD2d 979). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe Supreme Court—declaratory judgment, injunction.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Dillon, Hancock, Jr., Denman and Witmer, JJ.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 3 - 042 2 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 2 -NM - 097 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
### §57520. Vessel maintenance

(a) In General.—A charter under this chapter shall require the charterer, at the charterer's expense, to—

(1) keep the chartered vessel in good repair and efficient operating condition; and

(2) make any repairs required by the Secretary of Transportation.

(b) Inspection.—The charter shall provide that the Secretary has the right to inspect the vessel at any time to ascertain its condition.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1668.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 57520 | 46 App.:1202(b), (c). | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title VII, §712(b), (c), 49 Stat. 2010; Aug. 7, 1939, ch. 555, §1, 53 Stat. 1254; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(114), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 163. |

Section
### §53905. Agency insurance

(a) In General.—With the approval of the President, an agency of the United States Government may obtain insurance provided for by this chapter from the Secretary of Transportation, except as provided in sections 17302 and 17303 of title 40.

(b) Premium Waivers.—With the approval of the President, the Secretary of Transportation may provide insurance under this chapter at the request of the Secretary of Defense and other agencies the President may prescribe, without payment of an insurance premium if the Secretary of Defense or agency agrees to indemnify the Secretary of Transportation against loss covered by the insurance. The Secretary of Defense and agencies may make such an indemnity agreement.

(c) Presidential Approval.—The signature of the President (or an official designated by the President) on the agreement shall be treated as the approval required by section 53902(a) of this title.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1628.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 53905 | 46 App.:1285. | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title XII, §1205, as added Sept. 7, 1950, ch. 906, 64 Stat. 774; Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title X, §1071(a), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2137. |

Section
#### § 3.210 Military and merchant marine educational institutions.

These Title IX regulations do not apply to an educational institution whose primary purpose is the training of individuals for a military service of the United States or for the merchant marine.
### §41106. Marine terminal operators

A marine terminal operator may not—

(1) agree with another marine terminal operator or with a common carrier to boycott, or unreasonably discriminate in the provision of terminal services to, a common carrier or ocean tramp;

(2) give any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage or impose any undue or unreasonable prejudice or disadvantage with respect to any person; or

(3) unreasonably refuse to deal or negotiate.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §7, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1543.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 41106(1) | 46 App.:1709(d)(2). | Pub. L. 98–237, §10(d)(2), (3) (related to (b)(10)), (4), Mar. 20, 1984, 98 Stat. 77; Pub. L. 105–258, title I, §109(c), Oct. 14, 1998, 112 Stat. 1910. |
| 41106(2) | 46 App.:1709(d)(4). | |
| 41106(3) | 46 App.:1709(d)(3) (related to (b)(10)). | |

Section
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual
Report of Solo Cup Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 26, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert D. Koney, Jr., as Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert D. Koney, Jr.                            
|Robert D. Koney, Jr.                                
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)        
|March 17, 2011                                      

The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A
signed original of this written statement required by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
§ 983.5 Description of the PBV program. ( a ) *How PBV works.* ( 1 ) The PBV program is administered by a PHA that already administers the tenant-based voucher program under the consolidated annual contributions contract (ACC) in 24 CFR 982.151. In the PBV program, the assistance is “attached to the structure,” which may be a multifamily building or single-family building. (See description of the difference between “project-based” and “tenant-based” rental assistance at 24 CFR 982.1(b)).
( 2 ) The PHA enters into a HAP contract with an owner for units in existing housing or in newly constructed or rehabilitated housing.
( 3 ) In the case of new construction or rehabilitation, the owner may develop the housing pursuant to an Agreement (§ 983.154) between the owner and the PHA. In the Agreement, the PHA agrees to execute a HAP contract after the owner completes the construction or rehabilitation of the units. Alternatively: ( i ) The owner may develop the housing without an Agreement, before execution of a HAP contract, in accordance with § 983.154(f); or
( ii ) In the case of rehabilitation, the owner may develop the housing or complete development activity after execution of the HAP contract, in accordance with § 983.157.
( 4 ) During the term of the HAP contract, the PHA makes housing assistance payments to the owner for units leased and occupied by eligible families.
( b ) *How PBV is funded.* If a PHA decides to operate a PBV program, the PHA's PBV program is funded with a portion of appropriated funding (budget authority) available under the PHA's voucher ACC. This funding is used to pay housing assistance for both tenant-based and project-based voucher units. Likewise, the administrative fee funding made available to a PHA is used for the administration of both tenant-based and project-based voucher assistance.
( c ) *PHA discretion to operate PBV program.* A PHA has discretion whether to operate a PBV program. HUD approval is not required, except that the PHA must notify HUD of its intent to project-base its vouchers and when the PHA executes, amends, or extends a HAP contract. The PHA must also state in its Administrative Plan that it will engage in project-basing and must amend its Administrative Plan to include all PBV-related matters over which the PHA is exercising its policymaking discretion, including the subjects listed in § 983.10, as applicable.
[89 FR 38306, May 7, 2024]
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              Exhibit 11.1
                           DELTA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                                                     THREE MONTHS ENDED      SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                       JUNE 30, 1997          JUNE 30, 1997
                                                        ------------           ------------
<S>                                                  <C>                     <C>
Primary Earnings Per Share
--------------------------
   Net income                                           $ 7,224,664            $14,214,295
                                                        ============           ============

   Weighted average number of common
   and common equivalent shares:
   -----------------------------
      Average no. of shares outstanding                  15,372,288             15,345,926

      Net effect of dilutive stock options
        based on treasury stock method                          779                 49,111
                                                        ------------           ------------
   Total average shares:                                 15,373,067             15,395,037
                                                        ============           ============

   Primary earnings per share                           $      0.47            $      0.92
                                                        ============           ============


Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share
--------------------------------
   Net income                                           $ 7,224,664            $14,214,295
                                                        ============           ============

   Weighted average number of common
   and common equivalent shares:
   -----------------------------
      Average no. of shares outstanding                  15,372,288             15,345,926

      Net effect of dilutive stock options
      based on treasury stock method                         65,156                 64,304
                                                        ------------           ------------
   Total average shares:                                 15,437,444             15,410,230
                                                        ============           ============

   Fully diluted earnings per share                     $      0.47            $      0.92
                                                        ============           ============

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTHONY L. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., successor

in

- interest to U.S. AIRWAYS, INC.,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 20

- 15767

D.C. No. 3:19

- cv

- 08434

- JSC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California Jacqueline Scott Corley, Magistrate Judge, Presiding * *

Submitted April 20, 2021 * * *

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Anthony L. Williams appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his diversity action alleging employment claims under California law.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See

28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

* * * The panel unanimously conclud es this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

APR 28 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 15767

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the denial of a

motion to remand. D

- Bea m Ltd. P’ship v. Roller Derby Skates, Inc ., 366 F.3d 972,

974 n.2 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.

The district court properly denied Williams’s motion to remand because

defendant timely removed the action and the district court had subject matter

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) (setting forth

requirements for diversity jurisdiction); 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)(1) (notice of removal

“shall be filed within 30 days after the receipt by the defendant, through service or

otherwise, of a copy of the [complaint]”); Murphy Bros., Inc. v. Michetti Pipe

Stringing, Inc. , 526 U.S. 344, 347

- 48 (1999) (30

- day deadline to remove is

“triggered by” service of the summons and complaint).

In his opening brief, Williams fails to raise, and therefore has wai ved, any

challenge to the district court’s grant of judgment on the pleadings. See Indep.

Towers of Wash. v. Washington , 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[W]e will not

consider any claims that were not actually argued in appellant’s opening brief.”);

A costa

- Huerta v. Estelle , 7 F.3d 139, 144 (9th Cir. 1993) (issues not supported by

argument in pro se appellant’s opening brief are waived).

Williams’s motion for publication of the decision is denied.

AFFIRMED.
### §§1371c to 1371p. Repealed. July 21, 1949, ch. 356, §1(b), 63 Stat. 475

Section 1371c, acts Mar. 2, 1931, ch. 375, §4, 46 Stat. 1472; Ex. Ord. No. 6670 Apr. 7, 1934; June 24, 1936, ch. 754, §2, 49 Stat. 1904; Apr. 12, 1939, ch. 58, 53 Stat. 574; Dec. 16, 1941, ch. 584, §2, 55 Stat. 806, related to disability retirement.

Section 1371d, act July 29, 1942, ch. 536, §2, 56 Stat. 727, related to annuity on separations from service.

Section 1371e, acts Mar. 2, 1931, ch. 375, §6, 46 Stat. 1474; Aug. 10, 1939, ch. 660, 53 Stat. 1347; Dec. 16, 1941, ch. 584, §1, 55 Stat. 805; July 29, 1942, ch. 536, §3, 56 Stat. 727, related to method of computing annuities.

Section 1371f, acts Mar. 2, 1931, ch. 375, §7, 46 Stat. 1476; Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 859, §2, 54 Stat. 1117, related to computation of accredited service.

Section 1371g, acts Mar. 2, 1931, ch. 375, §8, 46 Stat. 1476; Ex. Ord. No. 6670, Apr. 7, 1934, related to credit for past service.

Section 1371h, acts Mar. 2, 1931, ch. 375, §9, 46 Stat. 1477; Ex. Ord. No. 6670, Apr. 7, 1934; Dec. 16, 1941, ch. 584, §2, 55 Stat. 806, related to deductions.

Section 1371i, act Mar. 2, 1931, ch. 375, §10, 46 Stat. 1477, related to investments and accounts.

Section 1371j, acts Mar. 2, 1931, ch. 375, §11, 46 Stat. 1477; Ex. Ord. No. 6670, Apr. 7, 1934; June 24, 1936, ch. 754, §§4 to 6, 49 Stat. 1905; Dec. 16, 1941, ch. 584, §4, 55 Stat. 806; July 29, 1942, ch. 536, §4, 56 Stat. 728, related to return of amounts deducted from salaries.

Section 1371k, acts Mar. 2, 1931, ch. 375, §12, 46 Stat. 1478; Ex. Ord. No. 6670, Apr. 7, 1934; July 29, 1942, ch. 536, §5, 56 Stat. 728, related to payment of annuities.

Section 1371l, acts Mar. 2, 1931, ch. 375, §13, 46 Stat. 1479; Aug. 10, 1937, ch. 573, 50 Stat. 619, related to benefits for those already retired.

Section 1371m, acts Mar. 2, 1931, ch. 375, §14, 46 Stat. 1479; Ex. Ord. No. 6670, Apr. 7, 1934, related to Board of actuaries.

Section 1371n, acts July 3, 1930, ch. 863, §2, 46 Stat. 1016; Mar. 2, 1931, ch. 375, §15, 46 Stat. 1479; Ex. Ord. No. 6670, eff. Apr. 7, 1934, related to administrative provisions.

Section 1371o, act Mar. 2, 1931, ch. 375, §16, 46 Stat. 1480, related to exemption from execution.

Section 1371p, acts July 3, 1930, ch. 863, §2, 46 Stat. 1016; Mar. 2, 1931, ch. 375, §17, 46 Stat. 1480; Ex. Ord. No. 6670, eff. Apr. 7, 1934, related to effective date of these sections.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Apr. 1, 1948, see Act July 21, 1949, ch. 356, §7(a), 63 Stat. 476.

#### Additional Repeal

Sections were also repealed by Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 648.
seeeeeee Continental Divide National Scenic Trail
North Platte

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM

Medicine Bow

17 Saratoga #

Encampment
14

62 _R6IW 6

i?) 10 20 40 60 80 100
ee
o 5 10 20 30 40 50
Miles

Map 2-17
Special Recreation Management Areas
Alternative 4
EXHIBIT
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Kentucky First Federal Bancorp on Form S-8 (File No. 333-130243) of our report
dated September 28, 2009 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements
of Kentucky First Federal Bancorp as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, and for each of
the two years in the period ended June 30, 2009, incorporated by reference in
this Form 10-K of Kentucky First Federal Bancorp for the year ended June 30,
2009.





/s/BKD,LLP





Cincinnati,
Ohio


September
28, 2009