alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3262 

To modify the civil money penalties incurred for unlawful employment of 

aliens. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 13, 2005 

Mrs. BLACKBURN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To modify the civil money penalties incurred for unlawful 

employment of aliens. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Employee Verification 

5 Accountability Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CIVIL MONEY PENALTIES FOR UNLAWFUL EMPLOY7 MENT OF ALIENS. 

8 Section 274A(e)(4)(A) of the Immigration and Na9 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1324a(e)(4)(A)) is amended to 

10 read as follows: 
2 

•HR 3262 IH 

1 ‘‘(A) shall require the person or entity to 

2 cease and desist from such violations and to 

3 pay a civil penalty in an amount of $10,000 for 

4 each unauthorized alien with respect to whom a 

5 violation of either of such subsections occurred; 

6 and’’. 

Æ
### §1313. Education, Commissioner of: report

In addition to the usual number of the report of the Commissioner of Education, thirty-five thousand copies shall be printed: five thousand for the Senate, ten thousand for the House of Representatives, and twenty thousand for distribution by the Commissioner of Education.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1267.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §253 (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §73, 28 Stat. 614).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of Commissioner of Education transferred to Secretary of Education pursuant to section 3441(a)(1) of Title 20, Education.
### SUBCHAPTER VI—SLUM CLEARANCE AND URBAN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
### §1469c. Availability of services, facilities, and equipment of agencies and instrumentalities of United States; reimbursement requirements

To the extent practicable, services, facilities, and equipment of agencies and instrumentalities of the United States Government may be made available, on a reimbursable basis, to the governments of the territories and possessions of the United States and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands. Reimbursements may be credited to the appropriation or fund of the agency or instrumentality through which the services, facilities, and equipment are provided. If otherwise authorized by law, such services, facilities, and equipment may be made available without reimbursement.

(Pub. L. 96–205, title VI, §603, Mar. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 90.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands

For termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, see note set out preceding section 1681 of this title.
§ 880.212 Broadband infrastructure. Any new construction or substantial rehabilitation, as substantial rehabilitation is defined by 24 CFR 5.100, of a building with more than 4 rental units and that is subject to a Housing Assistance Payments contract executed or renewed after January 19, 2017 must include installation of broadband infrastructure, as this term is also defined in 24 CFR 5.100, except where the owner determines and documents the determination that: ( a ) The location of the new construction or substantial rehabilitation makes installation of broadband infrastructure infeasible;
( b ) The cost of installing broadband infrastructure would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of its program or activity or in an undue financial burden; or
( c ) The structure of the housing to be substantially rehabilitated makes installation of broadband infrastructure infeasible.
[81 FR 92637, Dec. 20, 2016]
### §§711 to 715. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §703(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2789

Section 711, R.S. §2380, authorized reservation of town sites by President.

Section 712, R.S. §2381; acts Oct. 28, 1921, ch. 114, §1, 42 Stat. 208; Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 462, 43 Stat. 1145; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100, authorized reserved lands to be surveyed in urban and suburban lots and their appraisement and sale.

Section 713, R.S. §2382; acts Oct. 28, 1921, ch. 114, §1, 42 Stat. 208; Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 462, 43 Stat. 1145; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100; Aug. 24, 1954, ch. 904, §1, 68 Stat. 792, related to procedure for establishment of town or city sites.

Section 714, R.S. §2383, authorized extension of limits of towns established on unsurveyed lands.

Section 715, R.S. §2384; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100, authorized Secretary of the Interior to survey and plat cities or towns on the public domain where interested parties fail to file transcript maps in twelve months after establishment.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §703(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2789, provided that the repeal made by section 703(a) is effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976.

#### Savings Provision

Repeal by Pub. L. 94–579 not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
### §53907. Reinsurance

(a) In General.—To the extent the Secretary of Transportation is authorized to provide insurance under this chapter, the Secretary may provide reinsurance to a company authorized to do insurance business in a State of the United States. The Secretary may obtain reinsurance from such a company for any insurance provided by the Secretary under this chapter.

(b) Rates.—The Secretary may not provide reinsurance at rates less than, nor obtain reinsurance at rates more than, the rates established by the Secretary on the same or similar risks or the rates charged by the insurance company for the insurance reinsured, whichever is more advantageous to the Secretary. However, the Secretary may provide an allowance to the insurance company for the costs of services and facilities the company provides, in an amount the Secretary considers reasonable according to good business practice. The allowance to the company may not include any amount for soliciting or stimulating insurance business.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1629.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 53907 | 46 App.:1287. | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title XII, §1207, as added Sept. 7, 1950, ch. 906, 64 Stat. 775. |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "insurance under this chapter" are substituted for "marine, war risk, and liability insurance" for consistency in this chapter. The words "in whole or in part" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "obtain reinsurance from" are substituted for "reinsure with, or cede or retrocede to" for clarity and to eliminate unnecessary words.
### §32. Application

The provisions of this chapter shall be held to apply only to cables to which the convention for the time being applies.

(Feb. 29, 1888, ch. 17, §12, 25 Stat. 42.)
§ 1202.555 What portion of the gas that I produce is subject to royalty? ( a ) All gas produced from or allocated to your Indian lease is subject to royalty except the following: ( 1 ) Gas that is unavoidably lost.
( 2 ) Gas that is used on, or for the benefit of, the lease.
( 3 ) Gas that is used off-lease for the benefit of the lease when the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) approves such off-lease use.
( 4 ) Gas used as plant fuel as provided in § 1206.179(e).
( b ) You may use royalty-free only that proportionate share of each lease's production (actual or allocated) necessary to operate the production facility when you use gas for one of the following purposes: ( 1 ) On, or for the benefit of, the lease at a production facility handling production from more than one lease with BLM's approval.
( 2 ) At a production facility handling unitized or communitized production.
( c ) If the terms of your lease are inconsistent with this subpart, your lease terms will govern to the extent of that inconsistency.
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          The undersigned executive officers of Kentucky First Federal Bancorp (the “Registrant”) hereby certify that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

|   | By:    | /s/ Tony D. Whitaker                        |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                             |
|   | Name:  | Tony D. Whitaker                            |
|   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman        |
|   |   |                                        |
|   |   |                                        |
|   | By:    | /s/ R. Clay Hulette                         |
|   |   |                                             |
|   | Name:  | R. Clay Hulette                             |
|   | Title: | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and |
|   |   | Treasurer                                   |

Date: September 28, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           6,714
<SECURITIES>                                    45,999
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,566
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,982)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                65,849
<PP&E>                                         324,749<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 937,576
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           69,691
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           13,698
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (36,613)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   937,576
<SALES>                                         69,405
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                69,405
<CGS>                                           22,054<F2>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   69,712
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    74
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,753
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (19,214)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,094)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,350)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,350)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>PP&E IS SHOWN NET OF ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION.
<F2>INCLUDES PROGRAM FEES AND OTHER DIRECT EXPENSES.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Treff Operating Corp., Respondent, v. Town of Islip et al., Appellants.

In an action to declare the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Islip unconstitutional and confiscatory insofar as it affects vacant land owned by plaintiff, the land being zoned in an “AA” district, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 30, 1960, denying their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice and section 476 of the Civil Practice Act. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. There are triable issues in this case which should await the outcome of a trial. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information primarily extracted from
Capita Preferred Funding L.P.'s unaudited consolidated income statement and
balance sheet as of and for the three months ended March 31, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>              1,000
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                         MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           2,434<F2>
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           242,580
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F2>
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                              206,186
<COMMON>                                  36,394
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             242,580
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           5,362
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            5,362
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        5,362
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                               5,362
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        
<FN>
<F1>Accumulated depreciation relates to equipment under operating leases.
<F2>This item is not applicable since the Company does not prepare
    a classified balance sheet.
</FN>



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TCI
SATELLITE ENTERTAINMENT INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,903
<SECURITIES>                                    85,568
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  89,753
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        71,359
<OTHER-SE>                                         967
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    89,753
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,511
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 74,770
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             74,770
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    74,770
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.97


</TABLE>
#### John W. Miller et al., Appellants, *v.*William H. Hallock et al., Respondents.

(Argued December 1, 1881;

decided January 17, 1882.)

*J). 8. Biddle*for appellants.

*Frederick H. Mem*for respondents.

*634Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
### Selected bibliography of talc in the United States

By: C.W. Merrill

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1182C

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Douglas Lake Minerals Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB (Amendment No. 1) for the year ended May 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Harpreet S. Sangha, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Date:  November 2, 2006 | /s/ Harpreet S. Sangha
Harpreet S. Sangha 
President and Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Douglas Lake Minerals Inc. and will be retained by Douglas Lake Minerals Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
Editorial Note on Part 982
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999, and at 89 FR 38293, May 7, 2024.

§ 982.51 PHA authority to administer program. ( a ) The PHA must have authority to administer the program. The PHA must provide evidence, satisfactory to HUD, of its status as a PHA, of its authority to administer the program, and of the PHA jurisdiction.
( b ) The evidence submitted by the PHA to HUD must include enabling legislation and a supporting legal opinion satisfactory to HUD. The PHA must submit additional evidence when there is a change that affects its status as a PHA, its authority to administer the program, or its jurisdiction.
[60 FR 34695, July 3, 1995, as amended at 64 FR 26641, May 14, 1999; 80 FR 8245, Feb. 17, 2015]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1810

JAMES M. CLARK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusKENNETH S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-519) Submitted: October 29, 1999 Decided: November 9, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles D. Bennett, Jr., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. James A. Winn, Regional Chief Counsel, Patricia M. Smith, Deputy Chief Counsel, Robert S. Drum, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Joan E. Evans, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: James M. Clark appeals the district court's order adopting therecommendation of the magistrate judge and affirming the Commissioner's decision setting an onset date for award of disability benefits. We have reviewed the briefs and the administrative record, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Clark v. Apfel , No. CA-98-519 (E.D. Va. May 18, 1999). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Agenda for CEG 316(b) Meeting December 2, 2011** 
I. MeetingObjective II. Comparable Process for Impingement Mortality III. De Minimis Standard IV. Velocity Cap Definition as Pre Approved BTA V. Cooling Ponds/Cooling Towers as Pre Approved BTA and Cycles of Concentration Definition VI. Intake Velocity VII. Next Steps
No. 7828.

#### Commissioners of Hamilton County *v.*Fasold.

(Decided October 13, 1903.)

Error to Circuit Court of Hamilton county.

*Mr. G. C. Wilson,*county solicitor, and *Messrs 0.. J. Cosgrove*and *O. B. Jones,*assistant county solicitors, for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. J. J. GMdden;. J. B. Von Seggern*and' *Messrs. Cormany & Cormany,*for defendant in error-

judgment' affirmed.

Burket, C. 'J., Spear and Crew, JJ., concur. -