Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 115 / Tuesday, June 16, 2015 / Notices 34407 

of and, where necessary, to address 

tribal implications of the MSGP. In the 

course of this consultation, the EPA 

undertook the following activities: 

• December 11, 2012—EPA presented 

an overview of the 2008 MSGP and 

potential changes for the renewal of the 

MSGP to the National Tribal Caucus. 

• December 12, 2012—EPA presented 

an overview of the current MSGP and 

potential changes for the renewal of the 

MSGP to the National Tribal Water 

Council. 

• December 12, 2012—EPA mailed 

notification letters to tribal leaders 

initiating consultation and coordination 

on the renewal of the MSGP. The 

initiation letter was posted on the tribal 

portal Web site at http://www.epa.gov/

tribal/consultation. 

• January 15, 2013—EPA held an 

informational teleconference open to all 

tribal representatives, and reserved the 

last part of the teleconference for official 

consultation comments. EPA also 

invited tribes to submit written 

comments on the permit renewal. The 

presentation was posted on the tribal 

portal Web site at http://www.epa.gov/

tribal/consultation. 

VI. Analysis of Economic Impacts 

The EPA expects the economic impact 

on entities covered under this permit, 

including small businesses, to be 

minimal. A copy of the EPA’s economic 

analysis, titled, ‘‘Cost Impact Analysis 

for the Multi-Sector General Permit 

(MSGP)’’ is available in the docket for 

this permit. The economic impact 

analysis indicates that while there will 

be some incremental increase in the 

costs of complying with the new permit, 

these costs will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities. 

Authority: Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 

et seq. 

Dated: June 4, 2015. 

Deborah Szaro, 

Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region 

1. 

Dated: June 4, 2015. 

Jose ́ C. Font, 

Director, Caribbean Environmental Protection 

Division, EPA Region 2. 

Dated: June 4, 2015. 

Jon M. Capacasa, 

Director, Water Protection Division, EPA 

Region 3. 

Dated: June 4, 2015. 

Tinka G. Hyde, 

Director, Water Division, EPA Region 5. 

Dated: June 4, 2015. 

William K. Honker, 

Director, Water Quality Protection Division, 

EPA Region 6. 

Dated: June 4, 2015. 

Karen Flournoy, 

Director, Water, Wetlands, and Pesticides 

Division, EPA Region 7. 

Dated: June 4, 2015. 

Darcy O’Connor, 

Acting Assistant Regional Administrator, EPA 

Region 8. 

Dated: June 4, 2015. 

Nancy Woo, 

Acting Director, Water Division, EPA Region 

9. 

Dated: June 4, 2015. 

Daniel D. Opalski, 

Director, Office of Water and Watersheds, 

EPA Region 10. 

[FR Doc. 2015–14792 Filed 6–15–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9929–20–Region–6] 

Clean Air Act Operating Permit 

Program; Petition for Objection to 

State Operating Permit for Valero 

Refining—Meraux, LLC in Louisiana 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of final action. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Clean Air Act 

(CAA) Section 505(b)(2) and 40 CFR 

70.8(d), the EPA Administrator signed 

an Order, dated May 29, 2015, denying 

the petition asking EPA to object to an 

operating permit issued by the 

Louisiana Department of Environmental 

Quality for the Meraux petroleum 

refinery (Title V operating permit 

number 2500–00001–V5). The EPA’s 

May 29, 2015 Order responds to the 

petition submitted by the Concerned 

Citizens Around Murphy, represented 

by the Tulane Environmental Law 

Clinic, on April 3, 2012. Sections 307(b) 

and 505(b)(2) of the CAA provide that 

a petitioner may ask for judicial review 

of those portions of the Orders that deny 

issues raised in the petition by the 

United States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit. Any petition for 

review shall be filed within 60 days 

from the date this notice appears in the 

Federal Register, pursuant to section 

307(b) of the Act. 

ADDRESSES: You may review copies of 

the final Order, the petition, and other 

supporting information at EPA Region 6, 

1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202– 

2733. 

EPA requests that if at all possible, 

you contact the individual listed in the 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT

section to view copies of the final 

Orders, petitions, and other supporting 

information. You may view the hard 

copies Monday through Friday, from 

9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., excluding 

Federal holidays. If you wish to 

examine these documents, you should 

make an appointment at least 24 hours 

before the visiting day. Additionally, the 

final May 29, 2015 Order is available 

electronically at: http://www.epa.gov/

region07/air/title5/petitiondb/petitions/

meraux_response2012.pdf. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kyndall Cox at (214) 665–8567, email 

address: cox.kyndall@epa.gov or the 

above EPA, Region 6 address. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CAA 

affords EPA a 45-day period to review, 

and object, as appropriate, to a title V 

operating permit proposed by a state 

permitting authority. Section 505(b)(2) 

of the CAA authorizes any person to 

petition the EPA Administrator, within 

60 days after the expiration of this 

review period, to object to a title V 

operating permit if EPA has not done so. 

Petitions must be based only on 

objections to the permit that were raised 

with reasonable specificity during the 

public comment period provided by the 

state, unless the petitioner demonstrates 

that it was impracticable to raise these 

issues during the comment period or 

unless the grounds for the issue arose 

after this period. 

EPA received the petition from the 

Concerned Citizens Around Murphy 

(CCAM) on April 3, 2012 (2012 

Petition), which is the second petition 

that EPA received from CCAM 

concerning this facility’s title V permit. 

EPA previously received a petition from 

CCAM regarding the 2009 Meraux Title 

V Modification Permit (2009 Permit) on 

December 10, 2009 (2009 Petition), and 

responded to that petition in a prior 

order (2011 Order) that granted in part 

and denied in part the request for an 

objection. Within 90 days after that 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
34408 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 115 / Tuesday, June 16, 2015 / Notices 

order, the LDEQ issued a response to 

EPA’s title V order (2011 LDEQ 

Response). The 2012 Petition requests 

that the Administrator object to the 2009 

Permit on the general basis that ‘‘(the) 

LDEQ has not shown the facility’s 

emissions will not trigger Prevention of 

Significant Deterioration (PSD) 

requirements.’’ More specifically, the 

2012 Petition contends that the netting 

analysis LDEQ conducted for the 

BenFree Unit project and used to 

determine that the project did not 

trigger PSD review was incomplete 

because it only included emissions from 

normal operations to the North Flare. 

The 2012 Petition states that the netting 

analysis calculations ‘‘should have 

included emergency emissions’’ unless 

such emissions are subject to ‘‘legally 

and practicably enforceable limits.’’ The 

2012 Petition also contends that LDEQ 

failed to issue a revised permit that 

satisfies the EPA’s objections in the 

2011 Order. The Order issued on May 

29, 2015 responds to the 2012 Petition 

and explains the basis for EPA’s 

decisions. 

Dated: June 5, 2015. 

Ron Curry, 

Regional Administrator, Region 6. 

[FR Doc. 2015–14790 Filed 6–15–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0321; FRL–9928–13] 

Pesticide Maintenance Fee; Notice of 

Receipt of Requests to Voluntarily 

Cancel Certain Pesticide Registrations 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and 

Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), EPA is issuing 

a notice of receipt of requests by 

registrants to voluntarily cancel certain 

pesticide registrations. EPA intends to 

grant these requests at the close of the 

comment period for this announcement 

unless the Agency receives substantive 

comments within the comment period 

that would merit its further review of 

the requests, or unless the registrants 

withdraw its requests. If these requests 

are granted, any sale, distribution, or 

use of products listed in this notice will 

be permitted after the registrations have 

been cancelled only if such sale, 

distribution, or use is consistent with 

the terms as described in the final order. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before December 14, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0321, by 

one of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental 

Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ 

DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. 

Submit written withdrawal request by 

mail to: Information Technology and 

Resources Management Division 

(7502P), Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001. ATTN: Michael 

Yanchulis. 

• Hand Delivery: To make special 

arrangements for hand delivery or 

delivery of boxed information, please 

follow the instructions at http://

www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. 

Additional instructions on 

commenting or visiting the docket, 

along with more information about 

dockets generally, is available at 

http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Yanchulis, Information 

Technology and Resources Managment 

Division (7502P), Office of Pesticide 

Programs, Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone 

number: (703) 347–0237; email address: 

yanchulis.michael@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

This action is directed to the public 

in general, and may be of interest to a 

wide range of stakeholders including 

environmental, human health, and 

agricultural advocates; the chemical 

industry; pesticide users; and members 

of the public interested in the sale, 

distribution, or use of pesticides. 

B. What should I consider as I prepare 

my comments for EPA? 

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this 

information to EPA through 

regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark 

the part or all of the information that 

you claim to be CBI. For CBI 

information in a disk or CD–ROM that 

you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the 

disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then 

identify electronically within the disk or 

CD–ROM the specific information that 

is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 

complete version of the comment that 

includes information claimed as CBI, a 

copy of the comment that does not 

contain the information claimed as CBI 

must be submitted for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information so marked 

will not be disclosed except in 

accordance with procedures set forth in 

40 CFR part 2. 

2. Tips for preparing your comments. 

When preparing and submitting your 

comments, see the commenting tips at 

http://www.epa.gov/dockets/

comments.html. 

II. What action is the Agency taking? 

This notice announces receipt by the 

Agency of requests from registrants to 

cancel 314 pesticide products registered 

under FIFRA section 3 (7 U.S.C. 136a) 

or 24(c) (7 U.S.C. 136v(c)). These 

registrations are listed in sequence by 

registration number (or company 

number and 24(c) number) in Table 1 of 

this unit. 

Unless the Agency determines that 

there are substantive comments that 

warrant further review of the requests or 

the registrants withdraw their requests, 

EPA intends to issue an order in the 

Federal Register canceling all of the 

affected registrations. 

TABLE 1—REGISTRATIONS WITH PENDING REQUESTS FOR CANCELLATION

Registration No. Company No. Product name Chemical name 

100–793 ............ 100 Mefenoxam E ...................................................... Metalaxyl-M. 

100–795 ............ 100 Subdue WSP Fungicide ...................................... Metalaxyl-M. 

100–801 ............ 100 Ridomil Gold EC ................................................. Metalaxyl-M. 

100–823 ............ 100 Ridomil Gold PC GR ........................................... Metalaxyl-M; Pentachloronitrobenzene. 

100–958 ............ 100 Boundary Herbicide ............................................. Metribuzin; S-Metolachlor. 

100–964 ............ 100 Medal Herbicide .................................................. S-Metolachlor. 

100–965 ............ 100 Medal II Herbicide ............................................... S-Metolachlor. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES