alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1202.553 How do I value my production if I take more than my entitled share?

If you take more than your entitled share of production from a lease in an AFA for any month, you must determine the weighted-average value of all of the production that you take using the procedures in 30 CFR part 1206, and use that value for your entitled share of production.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1Section 302 Certification I, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that: I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing
distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered by
this annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2004-29;  1.
    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;  2.
    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to
the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, for
inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;  3.
    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trustee
under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and the
annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the
reports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;
and  4.
    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trustee
and the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth in
the pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A. Date: March 29, 2005 By:         /s/ Ellen Z. Lamale
Name:    Ellen Z. Lamale
Title:      Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary
#### Bristol Federal Savings Bank *v.*Dorothy E. Gagnon et al.

*Dorothy E. Gagnon,*pro se, in support of the petition.

Decided January 21, 1993

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 11781/11884) is denied.
### §392. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act May 14, 1898, ch. 299, §13, 30 Stat. 415, which provided for reciprocity with Canada as to mining rights, was omitted in view of the admission of Alaska into the Union.
#### § 100.2 Applicability.

The criteria and procedures in this part are applicable to all proposed assessments of civil penalties for violations of the Mine Act and the standards and regulations promulgated pursuant to the Mine Act, as amended. MSHA shall review each citation and order and shall make proposed assessments of civil penalties.
#### § 35.1325 Abatement.

Abatement shall be performed in accordance with methods and standards established either by a State or Indian tribe under a program authorized by EPA, or by EPA at 40 CFR 745.227(e), and shall be completed by achieving clearance in accordance with § 35.1340. If encapsulation or enclosure is used as a method of abatement, ongoing lead-based paint maintenance activities shall be performed as required by the applicable subpart of this part in accordance with § 35.1355. Abatement of an intact, factory-applied prime coating on metal surfaces is not required unless the surface is a friction surface.
§ 3285.505 Crawlspace ventilation. ( a ) A crawlspace with skirting must be provided with ventilation openings. The minimum net area of ventilation openings must not be less than one square foot (ft.2) for every 150 square feet (ft.2) of the home's floor area. The total area of ventilation openings may be reduced to one square foot (ft.2) for every 1,500 square feet (ft.2) of the home's floor area, where a uniform 6-mil polyethylene sheet material or other acceptable vapor retarder is installed, according to § 3285.204, on the ground surface beneath the entire floor area of the home.
( b ) Ventilation openings must be placed as high as practicable above the ground.
( c ) Ventilation openings must be located on at least two opposite sides to provide cross-ventilation.
( d ) Ventilation openings must be covered for their full height and width with a perforated corrosion and weather-resistant covering that is designed to prevent the entry of rodents. In areas subject to freezing, the coverings for the ventilation openings must also be of the adjustable type, permitting them to be in the open or closed position, depending on the climatic conditions.
( e ) Access opening(s) not less than 18 inches in width and 24 inches in height and not less than three square feet (ft.2) in area must be provided and must be located so that any utility connections located under the home are accessible.
( f ) Dryer vents and combustion air inlets must pass through the skirting to the outside. Any surface water runoff from the furnace, air conditioning, or water heater drains must be directed away from under the home or collected by other methods identified in § 3285.203.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               8
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,650
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,134
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,785
<PP&E>                                         134,892
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,002
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 195,276
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,461
<BONDS>                                        152,281
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           25,591
<PREFERRED>                                     23,000
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (83,207)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   195,276
<SALES>                                        114,223
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               114,223
<CGS>                                          103,448
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  119,693
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,421)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,479
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,528)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (200)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,328)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tumbleweed Communications Corp. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Jeffrey C.
Smith, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 10, 2005



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ JEFFREY C. SMITH                                 
|Jeffrey C. Smith Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
### §2174. Confirmation

#### (a) Objection

A special tax payer may object to confirmation of a plan.

#### (b) Confirmation

The court shall confirm the plan if—

(1) the plan complies with the provisions of title 11, made applicable to a case under this subchapter by section 2161 of this title;

(2) the plan complies with the provisions of this subchapter;

(3) the debtor is not prohibited by law from taking any action necessary to carry out the plan;

(4) except to the extent that the holder of a particular claim has agreed to a different treatment of such claim, the plan provides that on the effective date of the plan each holder of a claim of a kind specified in 507(a)(2) 1 of title 11 will receive on account of such claim cash equal to the allowed amount of such claim;

(5) any legislative, regulatory, or electoral approval necessary under applicable law in order to carry out any provision of the plan has been obtained, or such provision is expressly conditioned on such approval;

(6) the plan is feasible and in the best interests of creditors, which shall require the court to consider whether available remedies under the non-bankruptcy laws and constitution of the territory would result in a greater recovery for the creditors than is provided by such plan; and

(7) the plan is consistent with the applicable Fiscal Plan certified by the Oversight Board under subchapter II.

#### (c) Confirmation for debtors with a single class of claims

If all of the requirements of section 2174(b) of this title and section 1129(a) of title 11, incorporated into this subchapter by section 2161 of this title other than sections 1129(a)(8) and 1129(a)(10) are met with respect to a plan—

(1) with respect to which all claims are substantially similar under section 2161(e) of this title;

(2) that includes only one class of claims, which claims are impaired claims; and

(3) that was not accepted by such impaired class,

the court shall confirm the plan notwithstanding the requirements of such sections 1129(a)(8) and 1129(a)(10) of title 11 if the plan is fair and equitable and does not discriminate unfairly with respect to such impaired class.

(Pub. L. 114–187, title III, §314, June 30, 2016, 130 Stat. 583.)

1 So in original. Probably should be preceded by "section".
§ 23.3 Application procedures and requirements. ( a ) Before MSHA will undertake an active investigation leading to approval of any telephone or signaling device, the applicant shall make application by letter for an investigation leading to approval of the device. This application shall be sent to: U.S. Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration, Approval and Certification Center, 765 Technology Drive, Triadelphia, WV 26059, together with the required drawings, one complete telephone or signaling device, and instructions for its operation. Fees calculated in accordance with part 5 of this title shall be submitted in accordance with § 5.40.
( b ) Where the applicant for approval has used an independent laboratory under part 6 of this chapter to perform, in whole or in part, the necessary testing and evaluation for approval under this part, the applicant must provide to MSHA as part of the approval application: ( 1 ) Written evidence of the laboratory's independence and current recognition by a laboratory accrediting organization;
( 2 ) Complete technical explanation of how the product complies with each requirement in the applicable MSHA product approval requirements;
( 3 ) Identification of components or features of the product that are critical to the safety of the product; and
( 4 ) All documentation, including drawings and specifications, as submitted to the independent laboratory by the applicant and as required by this part.
( c ) An applicant may request testing and evaluation to non-MSHA product safety standards which have been determined by MSHA to be equivalent, under § 6.20 of this chapter, to MSHA's product approval requirements under this part.
[68 FR 36421, June 17, 2003, as amended at 70 FR 46343, Aug. 9, 2005; 70 FR 48872, Aug. 22, 2005; 73 FR 52212, Sept. 9, 2008]
### §33. Jurisdiction and venue of actions and offenses

The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction over all offenses against this chapter and of all suits of a civil nature arising thereunder, whether the infraction complained of shall have been committed within the territorial waters of the United States or on board a vessel of the United States outside of said waters: Provided, That in case such infraction is committed outside of the territorial waters of the United States the vessel on board of which it has been committed is a vessel of the United States. From the decrees and judgments of the district courts in actions and suits arising under this chapter appeals and writs of error 1 shall be allowed as now provided by law in other cases. Criminal actions and proceedings for a violation of the provisions of this chapter shall be commenced and prosecuted in the district court for the district within which the offense was committed, and when not committed within any judicial district, then in the district court for the district within which the offender may be found; and suits of a civil nature may be commenced in the district court for any district within which the defendant may be found and shall be served with process.

(Feb. 29, 1888, ch. 17, §13, 25 Stat. 42.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Abolition of Writs of Error

Writs of error were abolished, and relief previously obtainable by writs of error declared to be obtainable by appeal, by act Jan. 31, 1928, ch. 14, §1, 45 Stat. 54. See note preceding section 1 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

1 See Abolition of Writs of Error note below.
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 15-2189 IN RE: OAK KNOLL ASSOCIATES, L.P., Debtor

ROBERT HARRIS, Appellant,

v. ROSA SCARCELLI and OAK KNOLL ASSOCIATES, L.P., Appellees.

**ERRATA SHEET** The opinion of this Court issued on August 19, 2016, is amended as follows: On page 4, line 24, "his" is replaced with "its".
AAM-12-293-E 

April 11, 2012 

 Exemption No. 10500 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0368 

Mr. Mike Russell 

President 

Prestige Helicopters, Inc. 

1 Corsair Drive, Suite 111 

Chamblee, GA 30341 

Dear Mr. Russell: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated March 20, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Prestige Helicopters, Inc. (Prestige Helicopters), for an exemption from part 120 of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow 

Prestige Helicopters, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its 

safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Prestige Helicopters. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into 

one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 
2 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Prestige Helicopters, Inc., an exemption from 14 CFR 

part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Prestige Helicopters, which is operating under 

separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing 

program, subject to the conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Prestige Helicopters are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at 

all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

 2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the 

Prestige Helicopters part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on April 30, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1925 May BSEE direct me to conduct additional audits? ( a ) The BSEE may direct you to have an ASP audit of your SEMS program if BSEE identifies safety or non-compliance concerns based on the results of our inspections and evaluations, or as a result of an event. This BSEE-directed audit is in addition to the regular audit required by § 250.1920. Alternatively, BSEE may conduct an audit. ( 1 ) If BSEE directs you to have an ASP audit, you are responsible for all of the costs associated with the audit, and ( i ) The ASP must meet the requirements of §§ 250.1920 and 250.1921 of this subpart.
( ii ) You must submit an audit report of the audit findings, observations, deficiencies identified, and conclusions to BSEE within 60 days of the audit completion date.
( 2 ) If BSEE conducts the audit, BSEE will provide you with a report of the audit findings, observations, deficiencies identified, and conclusions as soon as practicable.
( b ) You must provide BSEE a copy of your CAP for addressing the deficiencies identified in the BSEE-directed audit within 60 days of the audit completion date. Your CAP must include the name and job title of the personnel responsible for correcting the identified deficiency(ies). The BSEE will notify you as soon as practicable after receipt of your CAP if your proposed schedule is not acceptable or if the CAP does not effectively address the audit findings.
[78 FR 20442, Apr. 5, 2013]
EXHIBIT 99.1
   
 
  
 

      

      With
respect to the Preferred Plus Trust Series ELP-1,  CSF-1,  LMG-2, and PMC-1 transactions
and the July    trust  distribution  date, the disbursements were not made on the trust
distribution date of July 16, 2007 but    instead was made on July 17, 2007. 
      
      With
respect to the Preferred  Plus Trust Series VER-1  transaction  and the December  trust
 distribution    date, the  disbursement was not made on the trust  distribution  date of
December 3, 2007 but instead was made    on December 5, 2007. 
    
      With
respect to the Public Steers Series 1999 REN-C1  transaction and the March trust
 distribution  date,    the  disbursement was not made on the trust  distribution  date
of March 1, 2007 but instead was made on March    8, 2007. 
    
      With
respect to the Public  Steers  Series 1998 TRV-C1  transaction  and the February  trust
 distribution    date, the disbursement was not made on the trust  distribution  date of
February 15, 2007 but instead was made      on February 20, 2007.




---





| |                                        |                      |                  | 
| | -------------------------------------- | -------------------- | ---------------- | 
| | Very truly yours,
THE BANK OF NEW YORK |                     
| | By:                                    | /s/
Joseph Panepinto |                 
| |                                        | Name:                | Joseph Panepinto | 
| |                                        | Title:               | Vice President   | 





---



®  ®  ®


---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Consolidated Statements of Financial
Position and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               8
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,101
<ALLOWANCES>                                        27
<INVENTORY>                                       1106
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2327
<PP&E>                                            2104
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1055
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    4905
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              939
<BONDS>                                            909
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           169
<OTHER-SE>                                        2463
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      4905
<SALES>                                            773
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1133
<CGS>                                              478
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      675
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   317
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     2
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  15
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    128
<INCOME-TAX>                                        49
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 79
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        79
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46
        

</TABLE>