24944 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 87 / Thursday, May 6, 2010 / Notices 

Management stating that the 2002 and 

2009 MVEBs for the Indianapolis, 

Indiana area, which were submitted 

with the state’s PM2.5 attainment 

demonstration, are adequate. Receipt of 

these MVEBs was announced on EPA’s 

transportation conformity website with 

a 30 day public comment period, and no 

comments were submitted. The finding 

is available at EPA’s conformity Web 

site: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/ 

stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm. 

The adequate 2002 and 2009 MVEBs, 

in tons per year (tpy), for PM2.5 and NOX

for the Indianapolis, Indiana area are as 

follows: 

INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA

PM2.5 (tpy) NOX (tpy) 

2002 ................................................ 842.37 ........................................................................ 47,815.51 

2009 ................................................ 518.43 ........................................................................ 28,537.23 

Transportation conformity is required 

by section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act. 

EPA’s conformity rule requires that 

transportation plans, programs, and 

projects conform to state air quality 

implementation plans and establishes 

the criteria and procedures for 

determining whether or not they do 

conform. Conformity to a State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) means that 

transportation activities will not 

produce new air quality violations, 

worsen existing violations, or delay 

timely attainment of the national 

ambient air quality standards. 

The criteria by which we determine 

whether a SIP’s motor vehicle emission 

budgets are adequate for transportation 

conformity purposes are outlined in 40 

CFR 93.118(e)(4). We have described 

our process for determining the 

adequacy of submitted SIP budgets in 

our July 1, 2004, preamble starting at 69 

FR 40038, and we used the information 

in these resources while making our 

adequacy determination. Please note 

that an adequacy review is separate 

from EPA’s completeness review, and it 

also should not be used to prejudge 

EPA’s ultimate approval of the SIP. 

Even if we find a budget adequate, the 

SIP could later be disapproved. 

The finding and the response to 

comments are available at EPA’s 

transportation conformity Web site: 

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/ 

stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671 q. 

Dated: April 26, 2010. 

Margaret Guerriero, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

[FR Doc. 2010–10693 Filed 5–5–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2009–0730; FRL–9146–1] 

Adequacy Status of the MilwaukeeRacine, Door County, Manitowoc 

County, and Sheboygan County, 

Wisconsin Areas Submitted 8-Hour 

Ozone Redesignation and Maintenance 

Plans for Transportation Conformity 

Purposes 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of adequacy. 

SUMMARY: In this notice, EPA is 

notifying the public that we have found 

that the motor vehicle emissions 

budgets (MVEBs) for volatile organic 

compounds (VOCs) and oxides of 

nitrogen (NOx) in the Milwaukee-Racine 

area, Door County, Manitowoc County, 

and Sheboygan County, Wisconsin 

ozone nonattainment areas are adequate 

for use in transportation conformity 

determinations. Wisconsin submitted a 

redesignation request and maintenance 

plan for the Milwaukee-Racine area, 

Door County, Manitowoc County, and 

Sheboygan County, Wisconsin on 

September 11, 2009. As a result of our 

finding, these Wisconsin areas must use 

the MVEBs from the submitted ozone 

maintenance plan for future 

transportation conformity 

determinations. 

DATES: This finding is effective May 21, 

2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Leslie, Environmental 

Engineer, Criteria Pollutant Section 

(AR–18J), Air Programs Branch, Air and 

Radiation Division, United States 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353–6680, 

leslie.michael@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, whenever 

‘‘we’’, ‘‘us’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. 

Background 

Today’s notice is simply an 

announcement of a finding that we have 

already made. On April 7, 2010, EPA 

Region 5 sent a letter to the Wisconsin 

Department of Natural Resources stating 

that the 2012 and 2020 MVEBs for the 

Milwaukee-Racine area, Door County, 

Manitowoc County, and Sheboygan 

County, Wisconsin 8-hour ozone areas 

are adequate. Receipt of these MVEBs 

was announced on EPA’s transportation 

conformity Web site, and no comments 

were submitted. The finding is available 

at EPA’s conformity Web site: http:// 

www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/ 

transconf/adequacy.htm. 

The adequate 2012 and 2020 MVEBs, 

in tons per day (tpd), for VOCs and NOx 

for the Wisconsin areas are as follows: 

Area 

2012 2020 

NOx 

(tpd) 

VOCs 

(tpd) 

NOx 

(tpd) 

VOCs 

(tpd) 

Milwaukee-Racine ............................................................................................ 47.27 22.66 20.41 14.91 

Door County ..................................................................................................... 1.55 0.78 0.74 0.53 

Manitowoc County ........................................................................................... 3.76 1.76 1.86 1.25 

Sheboygan County .......................................................................................... 4.15 2.01 1.79 1.32 

Transportation conformity is required 

by section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act. 

EPA’s conformity rule requires that 

transportation plans, programs, and 

projects conform to state air quality 

implementation plans and establishes 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 87 / Thursday, May 6, 2010 / Notices 24945 

the criteria and procedures for 

determining whether or not they do 

conform. Conformity to a State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) means that 

transportation activities will not 

produce new air quality violations, 

worsen existing violations, or delay 

timely attainment of the national 

ambient air quality standards. 

The criteria by which we determine 

whether a SIP’s MVEBs are adequate for 

transportation conformity purposes are 

outlined in 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4). We 

have described our process for 

determining the adequacy of submitted 

SIP budgets in our July 1, 2004, 

preamble starting at 69 FR 40038, and 

we used the information in these 

resources while making our adequacy 

determination. Please note that an 

adequacy review is separate from EPA’s 

completeness review, and it also should 

not be used to prejudge EPA’s ultimate 

approval of the SIP. Even if we find a 

budget adequate, the SIP could later be 

disapproved. 

The finding and the response to 

comments are available at EPA’s 

transportation conformity Web site: 

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/ 

stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671 q. 

Dated: April 26, 2010. 

Margaret Guerriero, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

[FR Doc. 2010–10684 Filed 5–5–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OECA–2009–0395; FRL–9145–2] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Submission to OMB for 

Review and Approval; Comment 

Request; NESHAP for Mineral Wool 

Production (Renewal), EPA ICR 

Number 1799.05, OMB Control Number 

2060–0362 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

3501 et seq.), this document announces 

that an Information Collection Request 

(ICR) has been forwarded to the Office 

of Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval. This is a request 

to renew an existing approved 

collection. The ICR which is abstracted 

below describes the nature of the 

collection and the estimated burden and 

cost. 

DATES: Additional comments may be 

submitted on or before June 7, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

referencing docket ID number EPA–HQ– 

OECA–2009–0395 to (1) EPA online 

using www.regulations.gov (our 

preferred method), or by e-mail to 

docket.oeca@epa.gov, or by mail to: EPA 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), Environmental 

Protection Agency, Enforcement and 

Compliance Docket and Information 

Center, mail code 28221T, 1200 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB at: 

Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs, Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer 

for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20503. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Learia Williams, Compliance 

Assessment and Media Programs 

Division, Office of Compliance, Mail 

Code 2223A, Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, 

NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone 

number: (202) 564–4113; fax number: 

(202) 564–0050; e-mail address: 

williams.learia@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has 

submitted the following ICR to OMB for 

review and approval according to the 

procedures prescribed in 5 CFR 1320.12. 

On July 8, 2009 (74 FR 32581), EPA 

sought comments on this ICR pursuant 

to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no 

comments. Any additional comments on 

this ICR should be submitted to EPA 

and OMB within 30 days of this notice. 

EPA has established a public docket 

for this ICR under docket ID number 

EPA–HQ–OECA–2009–0395, which is 

available for public viewing online at 

http://www.regulations.gov, in person 

viewing at the Enforcement and 

Compliance Docket in the EPA Docket 

Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 

3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC. The EPA Docket 

Center Public Reading Room is open 

from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and 

the telephone number for the 

Enforcement and Compliance Docket is 

(202) 566–1752. 

Use EPA’s electronic docket and 

comment system at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, to submit or view 

public comments, access the index 

listing of the contents of the docket, and 

to access those documents in the docket 

that are available electronically. Once in 

the system, select ‘‘docket search,’’ then 

key in the docket ID number identified 

above. Please note that EPA’s policy is 

that public comments, whether 

submitted electronically or in paper will 

be made available for public viewing at 

http://www.regulations.gov, as EPA 

receives them and without change, 

unless the comment contains 

copyrighted material, Confidential 

Business Information (CBI), or other 

information whose public disclosure is 

restricted by statute. For further 

information about the electronic docket, 

go to http://www.regulations.gov. 

Title: NESHAP for Mineral Wool 

Production (Renewal). 

ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 

1799.05, OMB Control Number 2060– 

0362. 

ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to 

expire on June 30, 2010. Under OMB 

regulations, the Agency may continue to 

conduct or sponsor the collection of 

information while this submission is 

pending at OMB. An Agency may not 

conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 

required to respond to, a collection of 

information unless it displays a 

currently valid OMB control number. 

The OMB control numbers for EPA’s 

regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after 

appearing in the Federal Register when 

approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, 

and displayed either by publication in 

the Federal Register or by other 

appropriate means, such as on the 

related collection instrument or form, if 

applicable. The display of OMB control 

numbers in certain EPA regulations is 

consolidated in 40 CFR part 9. 

Abstract: The National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 

(NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production 

(40 CFR part 63, subpart DDD) were 

proposed on May 8, 1997, and 

promulgated on June 1, 1999. Owners/ 

operators of mineral wool production 

plants are required to install fabric filter 

bag leak detection systems and then 

initiate corrective action procedures in 

the event of an operating problem. 

Owners/operators subject to NESHAP 

subpart DDD must also continuously 

monitor and record: (1) The operating 

temperature of each thermal incinerator; 

(2) cupola production (melt) rate; and 

(3) for each curing oven, the 

formaldehyde content of each binder 

formulation used to manufacture 

bonded products. 

Owners/operators of affected mineral 

wool production facility must submit 

initial notifications (where applicable), 

performance test and periodic reports. 

Owners or operators are also required to 

maintain records of the occurrence and 

duration of any startup, shutdown, or 

malfunction in the operation of an 

affected facility, or any period during 

which the monitoring system is 

inoperative. Semiannual reports are also 

required. These notifications, reports, 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES