alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
July 2008 

Background 

On October 1, 2007, the New Jersey 

Department of Environmental Protection 

adopted the Dental Amalgam rules. These 

rules, under N.J.A.C. 7:14A-21.12, are 

applicable to all dental facilities that 

generate amalgam waste through 

placement or removal of amalgams, and 

discharge wastewater to the sanitary 

sewer. These regulations are designed to 

curtail the release of 

mercury from dental 

facilities to the environment. 

What is Required? 

For existing dental facilities, 

Best Management Practices, or BMPs, are 

required to be implemented by October 1, 

2008, and an amalgam separator is 

required to be installed by October 1, 2009. 

An amalgam separator is equipment 

designed to remove amalgam waste 

contained in rinse or wastewater from 

chair-side water collection and discharge 

systems. The amalgam separator is 

required to be certified to perform at ninetyfive (95) percent or greater efficiency in 

accordance with the testing methodologies 

required by the International Standard 

Organization (ISO) 11143 protocol. The 

installation and proper operation of an 

amalgam separator will prevent at least 

ninety-five (95) percent of the amalgam 

waste from entering the sanitary sewer. 

New facilities (constructed on or after 

October 1, 2007) subject to the regulation 

shall immediately install an amalgam 

separator that meets the ISO 11143 

criteria. Along with these requirements, 

each dental facility subject to this 

regulation shall register and certify 

compliance annually with the 

Department. The Department is 

currently developing an on-line 

portal so that the 

registration and 

certification 

requirements can 

be completed online. 

Who is Exempt? 

Exemptions are 

specified under 

N.J.A.C. 7:14A21.12(a). Any facility 

that does not generate 

amalgam waste is 

exempt from these 

requirements. The 

following specialty practices are exempt 

provided no other types of dentistry are 

practiced at the facility: orthodontics; 

periodontics; endodontics; oral and 

maxillofacial surgery, oral and 

maxillofacial radiology; and oral and 

maxillofacial pathology. 

For more information, contact: 

NJ Department of Environmental Protection 

Division of Water Quality 

Bureau of Pretreatment and Residuals 

P.O. Box 029 

Trenton, NJ 08625-0029 

(609) 633-3823 

www.state.nj.us/dep/dwq 

Important Reminders: 

October 1, 2008—

Compliance with the BMP 

required. 

October 1, 2009—Amalgam 

separator must be 

installed in existing 

facilities. 

Annually—Register and 

Certify Compliance with 

the BMP and Separator 

Requirements. 

NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY 

BUREAU OF PRETREATMENT AND RESIDUALS 

REQUIREMENTS FOR DENTAL FACILITIES 

NEW 

JERSEY 

DEPARTMENT OF 

ENVIRONMENTAL 

PROTECTION
#### VOLLKOMMER, Respondent, v. HUMMEL, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 9, 1903.)

Action by Joseph Vollkommer against Gottlieb Hummel, impleaded, etc.

No opinion. Motion denied.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsStrain-Based Damage Determination Using Finite Element Analysis for Structural Health ManagementA damage determination method is presented that relies on in-service strain sensor measurements. The method employs a gradient-based optimization procedure combined with the finite element method for solution to the forward problem. It is demonstrated that strains, measured at a limited number of sensors, can be used to accurately determine the location, size, and orientation of damage. Numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the general procedure. This work is motivated by the need to provide structural health management systems with a real-time damage characterization. The damage cases investigated herein are characteristic of point-source damage, which can attain critical size during flight. The procedure described can be used to provide prognosis tools with the current damage configuration.Document ID20160006299Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsHochhalter, Jacob D.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Krishnamurthy, Thiagaraja*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Aguilo, Miguel A.*(Sandia Labs. Albuquerque, NM, United States)*Date AcquiredMay 17, 2016Publication DateApril 1, 2016Subject CategoryAir Transportation And SafetyStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNASA/TP-2016-219186L-20689NF1676L-24043Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: DE-AC04-94AL85000WBS: WBS 533127.02.16.07.06Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20160006299.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
###### Editorial Note on Part 250

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

#### § 250.152 How do I name facilities in the Alaska Region?

Facilities will be named and identified according to the Regional Director's directions.
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of China Sun Group High-Tech Co. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ming Fen Liu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 29, 2011





/s/ Ming Fen LiuMing Fen Liu, Principal Financial and

Accounting Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 16, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-51588 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GERARDO ACOSTA VASQUEZ, also known as Geraldo Acosta-Vasquez,also known as Jerry Vasquez, also known as Geraldo VasquezAcosta, also known as Gerardo Vasquez-Acosta, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-1911-15

-------------------- Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Gerardo Acosta Vasquez (Acosta) appeals his guilty-plea conviction of conspiring to possess and possessing with intent to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846. Acosta challenges the constitutionality of the treatment by § 841(b)(1)(B) of certain prior drug convictions as sentencing factors rather than offense elements that must be found by a jury in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). He also argues that the districtNo. 05-51588 -2- court committed plain error by failing to ask whether he affirmed or denied his prior conviction, as required by 21 U.S.C. § 851(b). Acosta’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Acosta contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and a majority of the current Court would overrule it in the light of Apprendi and subsequent Supreme Court authority. We have repeatedly rejected such contentions because Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Acosta properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. Regarding Acosta’s § 851 challenge, in the absence of a showing that the prior conviction was unconstitutionally obtained or was not committed by Acosta, he has not shown plain error.
See United States v. Thomas , 348 F.3d 78, 86-87 (5th Cir. 2003). Moreover, Acosta’s prior conviction occurred well beyond the five-year statute of limitations set forth in § 851(e). Accordingly, Acosta has failed to establish error, plain or otherwise, in the district court’s failure to follow the § 851(b) colloquy. See United States v. Fragoso , 978 F.2d 896, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1992).
AFFIRMED.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Firearms Training Systems, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2001 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, John A. Morelli, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ John A.
Morelli    
|
|
|
|
| |  | John A. Morelli        
|
|
|
|
| |  | Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
| |  | August 14, 2002
#### BENNETT, Respondent, v. GEORGE BORGFELDT & CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 6, 1903.)

Action by Clarence H. Bennett against George Borgfeldt & Co. L. S. Carrere, for appellant. A. S. Bacon, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
                      I, Courtney C. Smith, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Specialty Underwriters’ Alliance,Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b)  [Intentionally Omitted]  (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
Date: March 30, 2005               /s/ Courtney C. Smith     Courtney C. Smith   Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report") of Pinnacle Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certifies that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

/s/ Robert B. Nolen, Jr.
---------------------------------------------------
Robert B. Nolen, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and
 Chief Financial Officer

May 15, 2006
----------------------------------------------------
(Date)

      A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The
information furnished herein shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed
incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.


                                       17
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jeanette Geter, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered September 15, 1976, convicting her of possession of a weapon in the third degree and possession of gambling records in the second degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. We have reviewed the record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious grounds which could be raised on this appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631). Damiani, J. P., Suozzi, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Deltic Timber Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Clefton D. Vaughan, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.








/s/Clefton D. Vaughan





Clefton D. Vaughan


Chief Financial Officer


November 7, 2002
Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), Joseph Y.Liu, Chief Executive Officer of Oplink Communications, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that,to the best of his knowledge:**1.**The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005, to whichthis Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and**2.**The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition at the end of the period covered by the Quarterly Report and results ofoperations of the Company for the periods covered by the Quarterly Report.**In Witness Whereof,**the undersigned has set his hands hereto as of the 10th day of February, 2006.   /s/ Joseph Y. Liu Joseph Y. Liu  Chief Executive Officer  This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SECand is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Actof 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               9
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,597
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      8,051
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,672
<PP&E>                                         190,436
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,389
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 296,354
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,202
<BONDS>                                        133,085
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           23,620
<PREFERRED>                                     23,000
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,866
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   296,354
<SALES>                                        147,894
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               147,894
<CGS>                                          140,931
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  156,065
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (548)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,120
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,743)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,848)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,895)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,895)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### §10905. Complaints in foreign ports

(a) When a complaint under section 10902(a) of this title is made in a foreign port, the procedures of this chapter shall be followed, with a consular officer performing the duties of the judge or justice of the peace.

(b) On review of the marine surveyors' report, the consular officer may approve and must certify any part of the report with which the officer agrees. If the consular officer dissents from any part of the report, the officer shall certify reasons for dissenting from that part.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 576.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 10905 | 46:65646:657 |

46:657

Section 10905 provides that if a complaint of unfitness is made in a foreign port, a consular officer shall perform the duties of a judge or justice of the peace.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1

Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Ricardo A. Verdaguer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IMPSAT Fiber Networks,
Inc. (the Registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
Registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared,

(b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8283 (June 5,
2003)],

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation, and

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information, and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting.

/s/ Ricardo A. VerdaguerRicardo A. VerdaguerPresident and Chief Executive Officer


November 14, 2003