alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
***Weather Forecasting*
NOAA's Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory has developed a  Hurricane Prediction System that is the result of more than a  decade of R&D by a small group of GFDL scientists.  During the last  twohurricane seasons scientists at GFDL and at NOAA's National  Meteorological Center (NMC) in CampSprings, MD, have been  comparing this new system with their operational hurricane  forecast models. 
During the 1993 hurricane season, GFDL ran the model in semi- operational test mode on its owncomputing system located in  Princeton, using observational data and global forecasts provided by NMC.  Early in the season, the model's prediction for the storm track  of Hurricane Emily demonstratedits potential as a new forecasting  tool.  When Emily was 72 hours from possible landfall, the GFDL system predicted that the storm would move to the northeast, while  all other forecasts predicted thatEmily would move due west.  In  addition, GFDL's forecast predicted that the storm would approach  theOuter Banks of North Carolina and then would make an abrupt  turn to the northeast, moving back out tosea.  This initial  prediction, which was repeated in subsequent predictions in which  the model usedmore recent observations, was followed closely by  the actual storm track. 
Because of its success in forecasting Emily and other tropical  storms during the 1993 hurricaneseason, NMC decided to run the  GFDL system as part of its operational hurricane forecast suite in a parallel test mode during the 1994 season.  In order to do this, the  model was rewritten to improvethe wall-clock turn-around of its  forecasts during storm emergencies.  The redesigned, parallelized model exhibited a ten-fold improvement in wall-clock performance  on NMC's Cray Research C-90 systemcompared to the model's  performance on a single processor. 
During the 1994 season, the GFDL system was run for tropical  systems at all development stages, fromweaker tropical  depressions to full-blown  hurricanes.  It forecasted 60 cases for  the Atlantic, 148cases for the eastern Pacific, and a few  experimental cases for typhoons in the western Pacific.  Comparisons of the GFDL model's storm track forecasts with those  from current NMC hurricane modelsfor 1994 tropical storms in the  Atlantic indicate that the GFDL system is in the top performance group for forecasts out to 36 hours and is superior to all other  forecast models at 48 and 72 hours. 
Hurricane Gordon, one of the more important storms in the Atlantic  during the 1994 season, provided adifficult test for all forecasting  systems because of its complicated storm track.  The GFDL model was the first forecast system running at NMC to predict, three days  in advance, that Gordon wouldmove west from Cuba through the  Florida Strait and then turn northeast to cross the Floridapeninsula.   Later, as the storm moved north off the east coast, predictions from  the GFDL systemhinted at Gordon's abrupt U-turn back toward the  south. 
   http://www.hpcc.noaa.gov/Weather94**
#### § 1202.250 Overriding royalty interest.

The regulations governing overriding royalty interests, production payments, or similar interests created under Federal coal leases are in 43 CFR group 3400.

[54 FR 1522, Jan. 13, 1989]
* Pursuant to 5th CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-60879

Summary Calendar

MOHAMMED IMTIAZ SULTAN,

Petitioner,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A72 450 217

August 21, 1997

Before JOHNSON, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mohammed Imtiaz Sultan petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ decision dismissing his appeal, affirming the

denial of asylum and withholding of deportation. We have reviewed

the record and the briefs and determine that the Board’s decision

is supported by substantial evidence. See Carbajal-Gonzalez v.

INS, 78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir. 1996). Sultan further seeks review

of the Immigration Judge’s refusal to grant voluntary departure.
2

Consideration of the issue, however, is barred due to Sultan’s

failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. See Rodriguez v.

INS, 9 F.3d 408, 414 (5th Cir. 1993).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLDIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          58,306
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,978
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (538)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               264,577<F1>
<PP&E>                                          25,198
<DEPRECIATION>                                (15,633)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 390,794
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          160,075<F2>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           339
<OTHER-SE>                                     154,139
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   390,794
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               205,542
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  171,594
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,239
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,709
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,529
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,180
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,180
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .48
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES REAL ESTATE HELD FOR SALE OF $134,091.
<F2>INCLUDES NOTES PAYABLE ON REAL ESTATE HELD FOR SALE OF $75,120.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
INTHESUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFMONTANAOP22-0184MICHAELDUNNE,Petitioner,v.JIMSALMONSEN,Respondent,GRANTOFMOTIONTOPROCEEDWITHOUTPAYMENTOFFILINGFEEMotiontoproceedwithoutpaymentofthefilingfeeinthismatterisGRANTED.DATED:April14,2022.BOWENGREENWOODClerkoftheSupremeCourt04/14/2022Case Number: OP 22-0184
§ 880.502 Term of contract. ( a ) *Term (except for Manufactured Home Parks).* The term of the contract will be as follows: ( 1 ) For assisted units in a project financed with the aid of a loan insured or co-insured by the Federal government or a loan made, guaranteed or intended for purchase by the Federal government, the term will be 20 years.
( 2 ) For assisted units in a project financed other than as described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the term will be the lesser of (i) the term of the project's financing (but not less than 20 years), or (ii) 30 years, or 40 years if (A) the project is owned or financed by a loan or loan guarantee from a state or local agency, (B) the project is intended for occupancy by non-elderly families and (C) the project is located in an area designated by HUD as one requiring special financing assistance.
( b ) *Term for Manufactured Home Parks.* For manufactured home units or spaces in newly constructed manufactured home parks, the term of the Contract will be 20 years.
( c ) *Staged Projects.* If the project is completed in stages, the term of the Contract must relate separately to the units in each stage. The total Contract term for the units in all stages, beginning with the effective date of the Contract for the first stage, may not exceed the overall maximum term allowable for any one unit under this section, plus two years.
[44 FR 59410, Oct. 15, 1979, as amended at 45 FR 18924, Mar. 24, 1980; 48 FR 12705, Mar. 28, 1983; 49 FR 17449, Apr. 24, 1984]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets and unaudited condensed
consolidated statements of income found on pages 3 and 4 of the Company's Form
10-QSB for the year to date, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             652
<SECURITIES>                                         0      
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   652
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     864
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,168
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           125
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                        (179)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       864 
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,204
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,204)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,204)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
### §1421m. Repealed. Pub. L. 91–513, title III, §1101(a)(8), Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1292

Section, act Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 852, §15, 70 Stat. 910, prohibited production, manufacture, compounding, possession, sale, dispensation, administration, or transportation of marihuana in Guam. See section 801 et seq. of Title 21, Food and Drugs. Section was not enacted as part of the Organic Act of Guam which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on first day of seventh calendar month that begins after Oct. 26, 1970, see section 1105(a) of Pub. L. 91–513, set out as an Effective Date note under section 951 of Title 21, Food and Drugs.

#### Savings Provision

Prosecutions for any violation of law occurring, and civil seizures or forfeitures and injunction proceedings commenced, prior to the effective date of repeal of this section by section 1101 of Pub. L. 91–513 not to be affected or abated by reason thereof, see section 1103 of Pub. L. 91–513, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 21, Food and Drugs.
### §1323k. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Feb. 16, 1933, ch. 89, §4, 47 Stat. 813, related to repeal of prior postal laws and was omitted as not of general application, and as covered by the Canal Zone Code. The Canal Zone Code was subsequently redesignated the Panama Canal Code by Pub. L. 96–70, §3303(b), and repealed by Pub. L. 104–201, §3549.
### §1972. Controlled substances in freely associated states

#### (a) In general

The President is authorized to negotiate agreements which provide—

(1) that the United States shall carry out the provisions of part C of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 821 et seq.) as necessary to provide for the lawful distribution of controlled substances in the freely associated states; and

(2) that a freely associated state which institutes and maintains a voluntary system to report annual estimates of narcotics needs to the International Narcotics Control Board, and which imposes controls on imports of narcotic drugs consistent with the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961, shall be eligible for exports of narcotic drugs from the United States in the same manner as a country meeting the requirements of subsection (a) of section 953 1 of title 21.

#### (b) Effective date

Agreements concluded pursuant to this section shall become effective pursuant to section 1901(f)(5) of this title or section 1931(d)(5) of this title, as may be applicable.

(Pub. L. 101–219, title II, §201, Dec. 12, 1989, 103 Stat. 1874.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Controlled Substances Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), is title II of Pub. L. 91–513, Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1242. Part C of the Act is classified generally to part C (§821 et seq.) of subchapter I of chapter 13 of Title 21, Food and Drugs. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 801 of Title 21 and Tables.

Section 953 of title 21, referred to in subsec. (a)(2), was in the original "section 1003 of the Controlled Substances Act", and was translated as reading "section 1003 of the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act", meaning section 1003 of title III of Pub. L. 91–513, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

#### Codification

Section was formerly set out as a note under section 1681 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 of ReachLocal, Inc. (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Zorik Gordon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



/s/ Zorik GordonZorik GordonChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Date: March 28, 2011
u. gov~~ldPases/Rules.as~ 

x. You may also obtaln hord coples of the ~nfor- mrrtlon by calling the phone number 11sted beWr~tten comments may be submitted to lh9 Public 

lntorrnofian Off~ce at the 

above address Comments 

may alsa be emaikd to d~ 

P wrnments@w< gov The hear~ns dotes, locattons and comment deodl tnes 

arc as follows The ~ubllc 

heorlig fnr all alr suallb rules will take place be- gtnnlng at 6 p rn on Julr 7. 2014 rn the Dolly Sods Conference Room The 

camment pevod wl ll begln 

on June 6, 2014 and end at the conclus~on of the pub- lic heartns 

45CSR14 - Perrn~ts for 

Constructl@n orid Moror 

,ModIficat~nn ot Molor Stltlonar, Sources for the Preve~tlon af Srsnlficant 

Detertoratton'of AI~ Quality 

45CSRl6 - Standards of 

Performance for N$w Stat~onarv Sources 

45CS W -Control of Air 

?ollut~on tram Hazardous 

Woste Treatment, Stomea 

d5CSR30 - Requirements tQr operating Permits 

45CSP.34 - Emlsslon 

Standards for Hazardous 

Air Pollutants ~ 

Uwn author~mtlan and 

Plan pursuant to the fed- zral Clean Alr Ad U~on 

author~zotion and pmmulgat~on RuLes 45CSRI6, 45~~~!?5 and 45CSR34 wrll 

be submitted to EPA to 

fulflll federal oblieat~ons 

under the Clean Air Act, 

Plans and Pmeram 

aoorovals. Uaan authorifederal Clean Atr ACt .~, 

For more mtarmatlon on 

anv of the DAQ r.11-s call n.cwb-0475 

(565330) 
BILLED 

601 57TH STREET SE 

TO CHARLESTON WV 25304 USA 

I I 

Please return this portion with your payment. AMOUNT PAID: 

Make checks payable to: Charleston Newspapers 

do solemnly swear that the Iegal notice ofi 

6/6 2014 RULES DAQ PUBLI 

CHARLESTON NEWSPAPERS 

P.O. Box 2993 

Charleston, West Virginia 25330 

Billing 348-4898 

Classified 348-4848 

I-800-WVA-NEWS Legal pricing is based upon 63 words per column inch. 

WIN 55-0676079 Each successive insertion is discounted by 25% of the first insertion rate. 

-- -- 

OFr'ICtAL SEAL 

STATEOTYIE811'1101NU $ SA!?A{,3 & ':!f-i>g$fJ:] 

i ari LITI,I~ Ln;x 

SOUTH CSARI.ESTON, LQV 225809 My caarnisslon sxplre; Oclobet 24,2023 , 

TOTAL INVOICE AMOUNT 

was duly published in said newspaper(s) 

Subscribed and sworn to before me this 

'; 

;. 

.. 

.. .: 

.-' u . 

... 

J.i . ,. .-. . a . 

'- - --. _, . 

. : . .,,:,;- 

... ,, - . 

,-- - ... -2.:. . 

, , 77.18
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsInvestigation of Super*Zip separation jointAn investigation to determine the most likely cause of two failures of five tests on 79 inch diameter Lockheed Super*Zip spacecraft separation joints being used for the development of a Shuttle/Centaur propulsion system. This joint utilizes an explosively expanded tube to fracture surrounding prenotched aluminum plates to achieve planar separation. A test method was developed and more than 300 tests firings were made to provide an understanding of severance mechanisms and the functional performance effects of system variables. An approach for defining functional margin was developed, and specific recommendations were made for improving existing and future systems.Document ID19880012688Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsBement, Laurence J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Schimmel, Morry L.*(Schimmel Co. Saint Louis, Mo., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1988Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:4031L-16398NASA-TM-4031Accession Number88N22072Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 928-24-00-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19880012688.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
SERVED SEPTEMBER 7, 2011 

U.S. DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATION /'(Ej'y'?¥lSU,9t'^ 

2 OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

3 WASHINGTON, DC 

4 

3 

6 In the Matter of 

7 

8 CLOUD DANCLR AVIATION 

9 ANDrtYINGCLUBJNC. 

10 

11 Respondent 

, iAMSPORTATlON ^^ 

\.OCi<FT OPERATIONS 

2011 SEP - 3 A R^ 32 

Docket No. FAA-CPlOSOOUOl 

(FAA Civil Penalty Proceeding) 

DMSNo. PAA-2010-0192 

12 

13 

14 ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S MOTION 

15 

16 TO REOPEN DISCOVERY AND 

17 

18 GRANTING/DENYING OTHER RELIEF 

19 

20 On August 25, 2010, the Respondent Cloud Dancer Aviation and Flying Club, 

21 Inc. filed the following: 1) Motion to Reopen Discovery and/or Consider Pending 

22 Discovery Motion; and 2) Motion to Coiiipel Discovery. The FAA was served with the 

23 Motions, but did not file any response. 

24 

25 On September 1, 2011, the Respondent and the FAA appeared by telephone for a 

26 Litigation Scheduling Conference. At that time, the Respondent made an oral Motion to 

27 Dismiss the Complaint. The oral Motion was noted, and the Respondent was directed to 

28 .file a written Motion with supporting fact and authority if it wished to pursue a Motion to 

29 Dismiss. The Respondent's August 25, 2010 Motions were discussed and oral rulings 

30 were issued. 

31 

32 It Is Hereby Ordered: 

33 

34 1. The Respondent's Motion to Reopen Discoveryis granted. 

35 

36 2. The Respondent's Motion to Compel Discovery is respectfully reserved. If 

37 needed, the Respondent may renew this Motion prior to November 18, 2011 

38 (the discovery cut-off date). 

39 

40 

41 

42 

43 U.S. AMqiHjisfrative Law Judge 

44 

45 Attachment: Service List 

46 
FDMSNo. FAA-2010-0I92 

(Civil Penalty Proceeding) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1OOO' 

ONE COPY 

Dennis R. Haber, Respondent \s Counsel 

Dennis R. Haber, P. A. 

8925 S.W. 148 Street, Suite 200 

Miami, FL 33176 

TEL: 305-256-3002 

FAX: 305-256-3004 

Andrea Miclielle Harper, Complaimml 's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, ASO-7 

Southern Region 

Federal Aviation Admini.stration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta. GA 30320 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

The Honorable J. E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, Room El 2-320 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.B. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX:_202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 

2W1000, Washington; DC 20591, AHention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.