alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3418 

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities 

Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the 

Central Texas Water Recycling and Reuse Project, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2005 

Mr. EDWARDS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater 

Study and Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of 

the Interior to participate in the Central Texas Water 

Recycling and Reuse Project, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Central Texas Water 

5 Recycling Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Reclamation Wastewater and 

8 Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (Public Law 102– 
2 

•HR 3418 IH 

1 575; 43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) is amended by inserting after 

2 section 16ll the following new section: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 16ll. CENTRAL TEXAS WATER RECYCLING AND 

4 REUSE PROJECT. 

5 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in coopera6 tion with the City of Waco and other participating commu7 nities in the Central Texas Water Recycling and Reuse 

8 Project is authorized to participate in the design, plan9 ning, and construction of permanent facilities to reclaim 

10 and reuse water in McLennan County, Texas. 

11 ‘‘(b) COST SHARE.—The Federal share of the costs 

12 of the project described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 

13 25 percent of the total cost. 

14 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—The Secretary shall not provide 

15 funds for the operation and maintenance of the project 

16 described in subsection (a).’’. 

17 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

18 for such Act is amended by inserting after the item relat19 ing to section 16ll the following: 

‘‘Sec. 16ll. Central Texas Water Recycling and Reuse Project.’’. 

Æ
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund XI, LLC, (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 26, 2008                                                                                                              
|                                                                                                                                  
|/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                                            
|Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                                                
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 12.2
   1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of China Finance Online Co. Limited;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the company and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and
 (c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the
audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Jeff WangName:
    Jeff WangTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
```

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         In connection with the annual report of Ames True Temper, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 25, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Judy Schuchart, the Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

               (i)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                    13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
                    Act of 1934; and

               (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and results
                    of operations of the Company.

Date:  December 23, 2004

                  /s/ Judy Schuchart
                  -------------------------------------
                  Judy Schuchart
                  Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer
                  (Principal Accounting Officer and
                  Principal Financial Officer)
```
§ 1227.803 What are the hearing procedures for terminating a State's delegation agreement? ( a ) The ONRR Director will appoint a hearing official to conduct one or more public hearings for fact finding and to determine any actions you must take to correct the noncompliance. The hearing official will not decide whether to terminate your delegation agreement;
( b ) The hearing official will contact you about scheduling a hearing date and location;
( c ) The hearing official will publish notice of the hearing in the Federal Register and other appropriate media within your State;
( d ) At the hearing, you will have an opportunity to present testimony and written information on your ability to perform your delegated functions as required under this part, your delegation agreement, and the *Standards*;
( e ) Other persons may attend the hearing and may present testimony and written information for the record;
( f ) ONRR will record the hearing;
( g ) After the hearing, ONRR may require you to submit additional information; and
( h ) Information presented at each public hearing will help ONRR to determine whether: ( 1 ) You have complied with the terms and conditions of your delegation agreement; or
( 2 ) You have the capability to comply with the requirements under § 1227.106 of this part.
[62 FR 43084, Aug. 12, 1997, as amended at 75 FR 61087, Oct. 4, 2010]
H. R. 3071

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and five 

An Act 

To permit the individuals currently serving as Executive Director, Deputy Executive 

Directors, and General Counsel of the Office of Compliance to serve one additional 

term.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. PERMITTING CURRENT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, DEPUTY 

EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS, AND GENERAL COUNSEL OF 

OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE TO SERVE ONE ADDITIONAL 

TERM. 

(a) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR.—Notwithstanding section 302(a)(3) 

of the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 

1382(a)(3)), the individual serving as Executive Director of the 

Office of Compliance as of the date of the enactment of this Act 

may serve one additional term. 

(b) DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS.—Notwithstanding section 

302(b)(2) of such Act (2 U.S.C. 1382(b)(2)), any individual serving 

as a Deputy Executive Director of the Office of Compliance as 

of the date of the enactment of this Act may serve one additional 

term. 

(c) GENERAL COUNSEL.—Notwithstanding section 302(c)(5) of 

such Act (2 U.S.C. 1382(c)(5)), the individual serving as General 

Counsel of the Office of Compliance as of the date of the enactment 

of this Act may serve one additional term.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Martin, Michael (OST) ^O T - QST - '^^oo^,- M'A S \ 

From: Joel Bezek [joelbezek@gmail.com] .-^ -^r • • ^"'-Tq'Q'i 

Sent: Wednesday, April 21,2010 7:33 PM •rMU;; ; yii-' • 

To: EAS(OST) 

Subject: Fwd: Johnstown 

Hello, 

I was diasppointed to read in the TRIBUNE DEMOCRAT this morning the article about Colgan Air. 

To renew the Colgan Air contact is a mistake: 

• Our airport has seen a DECLINE in its use since their contract began rather than an INCREASE. 

• Our choices are limited with Colgan Air. 

• The other carriers are "interesting" choice that are worth a second glance. What's the downside? 

As I've heard: The definition of insanity is doing something the same way and expecting a different results. 

This choice is a case in point. 

Joel A. Bezek 

Westmont
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3395 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain work footwear. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 21, 2005 

Mr. RYUN of Kansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain work footwear. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN WORK FOOTWEAR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 
2 

•HR 3395 IH 

‘‘ 9902.64.14 House slippers with outer 

soles of rubber, plastics, 

leather or composition leather and uppers of leather, valued not over $2.50/pair 

(provided for in subheading 

6403.99.75 Sports footwear; 

tennis shoes, basketball 

shoes, gym shoes, training 

shoes and the like, all the 

foregoing with outer soles of 

rubber or plastics and for 

women (provided for in subheading 6404.11.20) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
----

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

|   | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                  Peter T.                  Socha                                                       Peter                  T. SochaPresident                  and Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### §1415. Restrictions upon exportation

No guano shall be taken from any island, rock, or key mentioned in section 1411 of this title, except for the use of the citizens of the United States or of persons resident therein. The discoverer, or his widow, heir, executor, administrator, or assigns, shall enter into bond, in such penalty and with such sureties as may be required by the President, to deliver the guano to citizens of the United States, for the purpose of being used therein, and to none others, and at the price prescribed, and to provide all necessary facilities for that purpose within a time to be fixed in the bond; and any breach of the provisions thereof shall be deemed a forfeiture of all rights accruing under and by virtue of this chapter.

(R.S. §5574.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §5574 derived from acts Aug. 18, 1856, ch. 164, §2, 11 Stat. 119; July 28, 1866, ch. 298, §3, 14 Stat. 328; Apr. 2, 1872, ch. 81, §1, 17 Stat. 48.

An additional provision of R.S. §5574 suspending this section for 5 years from and after July 14, 1872, in relation to all persons who had complied with the provisions of that title of the Revised Statutes, was omitted as temporary.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6815** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. STEVEN NADROSKI , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis trict of Virginia , at Newport News . Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 4:06

- cr - 00027

- RAJ

- JEB

- 2 )

Submitted : October 14, 2010 Decided: October 21, 2010

Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Steven Nadroski, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Ronald Gill, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Steven Nadroski seeks to appeal the district cour t ’ s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2010 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of a ppealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006) ; Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Ci r. 2004).
A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473 , 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatab le claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Nadroski has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the app eal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts3 and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-41042

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE ROEL SALINAS, also known as Prim,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:11-CR-1667-18

Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Jose Roel Salinas has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Salinas has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 17, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 12-41042 Document: 00512473264 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
No. 12-41042

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 12-41042 Document: 00512473264 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
### §644. Preference right to entryman under State laws

The Secretary of the Interior, when restoring to the public domain lands that have been segregated to a State under sections 641, 642 and 643 1 of this title is authorized, in his discretion and under such rules and regulations as he may establish to allow for not exceeding ninety days to any entryman under section 641 of this title a preference right of entry under applicable land laws of any of such lands which such person had entered under and pursuant to the State laws providing for the administration of the grant under section 641 of this title and upon which such person had established actual bona fide residence or had made substantial and permanent improvements: Provided, That each entryman shall be entitled to a credit as residence upon his new homestead entry allowed hereunder of the time that he has actually lived upon the claim as a bona fide resident thereof.

(Feb. 14, 1920, ch. 74, 41 Stat. 407.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 643 of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §704(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2792.

1 See References in Text note below.
### §56310. Voluntary purchase or charter agreements

During any period in which vessels may be requisitioned under this chapter as amended,1 the President is authorized through the Secretary of Transportation to acquire by voluntary agreement of purchase or charter the ownership or use of any merchant vessel not owned by citizens of the United States.

(Added and amended Pub. L. 115–91, div. C, title XXXV, §3504(b), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1912.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, as added and amended by section 3504(b) of Pub. L. 115–91, is based on act Aug. 9, 1954, ch. 659, §2, 68 Stat. 675; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(152), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 167, which was formerly classified to section 197 of Title 50, War and National Defense, before being transferred to this chapter and renumbered as this section.

#### Amendments

2017—Pub. L. 115–91, §3504(b)(2), inserted section enumerator and catchline and, in text, substituted "this chapter" for "section 902 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936,".

Pub. L. 115–91, §3504(b)(1), transferred section 2 of act Aug. 9, 1954, to this chapter and renumbered it as this section. See Codification note above.

1 So in original.
### Fw: Pest Management Policy and IPM Practice Standard 595 Allison Wiedeman to: Jack Faulk 09/28/2009 08:15 AM History: This message has been forwarded. Plse pass on

----------------- Sent by EPA Wireless E-Mail Services ----- Original Message ----- From: "Smallwood, Benjamin - Washington, DC" [Benjamin.Smallwood@wdc.usda.gov] Sent: 09/28/2009 06:35 AM AST To: Allison Wiedeman Subject: Pest Management Policy and IPM Practice Standard 595
As requested. Benjamin F. Smallwood National Pest Management Spec. USDA-NRCS NHQ-Ecological Sciences Divison Washington, DC. 20013 Tel. # (202) 720-7838