alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3292 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3292

       To extend the duty suspension on pro-jet black 263 stage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 14, 2005

  Mr. Castle introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the duty suspension on pro-jet black 263 stage.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRO-JET BLACK 263 STAGE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.03.09 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended--
            (1) by striking the article description and inserting 
        ``[[Substituted naphthalenylazol] alkoxyl phenyl azo] 
        carboxyphenylene, lithium salt (PMN No. P-00-351) (provided for 
        in subheading 3204.14.30)''; and
            (2) by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/
        2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
1 Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA) Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 10:41 AM To: 'conrad.naas@aig.com' Cc: Cooper, Thuy (FAA); Pappas, Rob (FAA); Ho ekstra, Kathlyn (FAA); Pearson, Lakisha (FAA); Schandler, Andrea (FAA) Subject: Request for Additional Information

March 3, 2015

Mr. Conrad J. Naas Associate General Counsel Global Claims, Operations and Systems AIG Property Casualty 80 Pine Street, 30 Floor New York, NY 10005

Dear Mr. Naas: This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2014-0913). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 The Hawkeye Lancaster MK-III UAS is not described in enough detail to make an assessment. Please include the following information:
o Geometry/size
o Structure
o Autopilot
o Safety Features
o Telemetry
o Sensor Suite

 The IRIS+ UAS was not described in enough detail to make an assessment. Please include the following information:
o Size
o Maximum gross take-off weight or empty weight
o Maximum operating airspeed

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by March 17, 2015. If we do not receiv e the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677. Sincerely,

Nia Daniels2 Program Analyst
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.2


                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Sam Qian, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of China Finance Online Co.
     Limited;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
          by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
          procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control
          over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by
          the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably
          likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over
          financial reporting; and

5.   The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
     most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
     company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the company's internal
          control over financial reporting.


Date: April 28, 2005


/s/ Sam Qian
-------------------------------------------
Name: Sam Qian
Title: Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to**

**Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002**

I, Héctor Alonso, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IMPSAT Fiber Networks, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [omitted] 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function): 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

May 15, 2006
### §105. Consular officer

In this title, the term "consular officer" means an officer or employee of the United States Government designated under regulations to issue visas.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §4, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1486.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 105 | 46:2101(6). | |

Section
§ 1204.203 What is the other relief option? ( a ) Under this relief option, you may request any type of accounting and auditing relief that is appropriate for production from your marginal property, provided it is not prohibited under § 1204.204 and meets the statutory requirements of § 1204.5. Examples of relief options you could request are: ( 1 ) To report and pay royalties using a valuation method other than that required under 30 CFR part 1206 that approximates royalties payable under that part 1206; and
( 2 ) To reduce your royalty audit burden. However, ONRR will not consider any request that eliminates ONRR's or the States' right to audit.
( b ) You must request approval from ONRR under § 1204.205(b), and receive approval under § 1204.206 before taking relief under this option.
AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVE

CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY 

CZECH REPUBLIC 

Airport Ruzyne, 160 08 Prague 6

tel: 420-2-324086, fax: 420-2-364112

Number: CAA-AD-4-099/98 

Date of issue: December 30, 1998

LET, a.s., Kunovice 

AEROTECHNIK CZ s.r.o., Kunovice 

L 13, L 13A, L 13AC, L 13SW, L 13SE, ++

SAILPLANE - ELEVATOR - INSPECTION/COLOR MARKING

Applicability: Sailplane L13, all models and serial numbers, certificated in any category. Powered 

sailplane L13-Vivat, all models and serial numbers, certificated in any category. 

Reason: Colour marking of elevator drive is not inspected or re-painted during sailplane 

operation. The elevator drive is asymmetrical and improper installation causes 

significant elevator deflection changes.

Effective date: January 28, 1999 

Compliance : Action must be done after AD receipt, not later than May 31, 1999 and either in 

accordance with LET, a.s., Mandatory Bulletin No. L13/082a dated November 27, 

1998 which becomes herewith part of this AD and may be obtained from: LET, a.s., 

686 04 Kunovice, CZECH REPUBLIC or in accordance with AEROTECHNIK CZ

s.r.o. Mandatory Bulletin No. SW 13-045a, SEH 13-003a, SL 13-002a dated

December 4, 1998, which becomes herewith part of this AD and may be obtained 

from: AEROTECHNIK CZ s.r.o., 686 04 Kunovice, CZECH REPUBLIC 

Remarks: - Where applicable, the requirements of this AD must be integrated into the Aircraft ́s Logbook(s). 

 - Address inquiries concerning this AD to: Civil Aviation Authority, Airworthiness Division,

 Ruzyne Airport, 160 08 Prague 6, Czech Republic, tel: 420 2 324086, fax: 420 2 364112. 

 Ing. Pavel MATOUŠEK 

 Director of Airworthiness Division

 CAA CZ 

 CAA-AD-4-099/98

 1/1
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Copano Energy, L.L.C. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2005, I, John R. Eckel, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: March 31, 2005 | /s/ John R. Eckel, Jr.                            |   |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                 | John R. Eckel, Jr.                                |
|                 | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
### §9306. State regulation prohibited

A State or political subdivision of a State may not regulate or impose any requirement on pilotage on the Great Lakes.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 559.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 9306 | 46:216g |

Section 9306 prohibits State or local regulations of pilotage on the Great Lakes and is part of the exception provided by law envisioned under section 8501(a).
§ 15.6 Issuance of approval. ( a ) MSHA will issue an approval or a notice of the reasons for denying approval after completing the evaluation and testing provided for by this part.
( b ) An applicant shall not advertise or otherwise represent an explosive or sheathed explosive unit as approved until MSHA has issued an approval.
#### § 902.24 [Reserved]
Exhibit 21.1



FCStone Group, Inc.



A Delaware Corporation



|                               |  |                              
|------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|Subsidiaries                   |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|FCC Futures, Inc.              |  | Iowa                         
|FCC Investments, Inc.          |  | Iowa                         
|FCStone, LLC                   |  | Iowa                         
|FCStone Advisory, Inc.         |  | Iowa                         
|FCStone Carbon, LLC            |  | Iowa                         
|FCStone do Brazil              |  | Brazil                       
|FCStone Canada ULC             |  | Nova Scotia                  
|FCStone Financial, Inc.        |  | Iowa                         
|FCStone Forex, LLC             |  | Iowa                         
|FCStone Information, LLC       |  | Iowa                         
|FCStone International, LLC     |  | Iowa                         
|FCStone Investments, Inc.      |  | Iowa                         
|FCStone Trading, LLC           |  | Iowa                         
|FCStone Merchant Services, LLC |  | Delaware                     
|Westown Commodities, LLC       |  | Iowa
§ 990.255 Overview. ( a ) PHAs shall manage their properties according to an asset management model, consistent with the management norms in the broader multi-family management industry. PHAs shall also implement project-based management, project-based budgeting, and project-based accounting, which are essential components of asset management. The goals of asset management are to: ( 1 ) Improve the operational efficiency and effectiveness of managing public housing assets;
( 2 ) Better preserve and protect each asset;
( 3 ) Provide appropriate mechanisms for monitoring performance at the property level; and
( 4 ) Facilitate future investment and reinvestment in public housing by public and private sector entities.
( b ) HUD recognizes that appropriate changes in its regulatory and monitoring programs may be needed to support PHAs to undertake the goals identified in paragraph (a) of this section.
(May 9, 1963)

#### Cecil O. Lyons, Respondent, v. Ernest R. Provencial et al., Defendants-Appellants, and City of New York, Appellant-Respondent. Emma Golden, as Administratrix of the Estate of Frank Golden, Deceased, Respondent, v. Ernest R. Provencial et al., Appellants, and City of New York, Appellant-Respondent.

These separate actions for damages for personal injuries and, in the ease of plaintiff Golden, for wrongful death also, were consolidated for purposes of trial. A separate verdict was rendered in each ease upon which a judgment was thereafter entered. While the appeals are treated together, the disposition made in each ease applies only to the respective *518judgment involved. Judgment entered for plaintiff Lyons is reversed on the law and the facts, the verdict vacated and a new trial granted, with costs to defendants-appellants, unless plaintiff Lyons stipulates to accept $30,000 in lieu of the award by verdict, in which event the judgment obtained by plaintiff Lyons is modified to that extent, and is affirmed as thus modified, with costs to defendants-appellants. Judgment entered for plaintiff Golden is reversed on the law and the facts, the verdict vacated and a new trial granted, with costs to defendants-appellants, unless plaintiff Golden stipulates to accept $45,000, of which $40,000 is fixed as recovery in the death action and $5,000 for pain and suffering, together with such interest as authorized by statute, in lieu of the award by verdict, in which event the judgment obtained by plaintiff Golden is modified to that extent, and is affirmed as thus modified, with costs to defendants-appellants. In these actions it is evident that the jury verdicts are grossly excessive in their award of damages, and verdicts in excess of the amounts indicated are not warranted on the record. Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
§ 180.680 Final decisions. ( a ) *Public disclosure.* HUD shall make public disclosure of each final decision.
( b ) *Where initial decision does not provide for suspension or termination of, or* refusal to grant or continue, Federal financial assistance— ( 1 ) *Issuance of final decision by Secretary.* The Secretary may review any finding of fact, conclusion of law, or order contained in the initial decision of the ALJ and issue a final decision in the proceeding. The Secretary shall serve the final decision on all parties no later than 30 days after the date of issuance of the initial decision.
( 2 ) *No final decision by Secretary.* If the Secretary does not serve a final decision within the time period described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the initial decision of the ALJ will become the final agency decision. For the purposes of this part, such a final decision will be considered to have been issued 30 days after the date of issuance of the initial decision.
( c ) *Where initial decision provides for suspension or termination of, or refusal to grant or continue, Federal financial assistance.* When the initial decision provides for the suspension or termination of, or the refusal to grant or continue, Federal financial assistance, or the imposition of any other sanction, such decision shall not constitute an order or final agency action until approved by the Secretary. Further, in the case of proceedings under title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, no order suspending, terminating, or refusing to grant or continue Federal financial assistance shall become effective until the requirements of 24 CFR 1.8(c) have been met.
### §1606. Enforcement

#### (a) Violations

A violation of this chapter or a regulation promulgated under this chapter shall be treated as a violation of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 151 et seq.) or a regulation promulgated under such Act, respectively. The Commission shall enforce this chapter and the regulations promulgated under this chapter in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though all applicable terms and provisions of the Communications Act of 1934 were incorporated into and made a part of this chapter.

#### (b) Additional penalties

#### (1) In general

Except as provided in paragraph (2), in addition to penalties under the Communications Act of 1934, a recipient of a reimbursement under the Program found to have violated section 1603 of this title, the regulations promulgated under such section, or the commitments made by the recipient in the application for the reimbursement—

(A) shall repay to the Commission all reimbursement funds provided to the recipient under the Program;

(B) shall be barred from further participation in the Program;

(C) shall be referred to all appropriate law enforcement agencies or officials for further action under applicable criminal and civil laws; and

(D) may be barred by the Commission from participation in other programs of the Commission, including the Federal universal service support programs established under section 254 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 254).

#### (2) Notice and opportunity to cure

The penalties described in paragraph (1) shall not apply to a recipient of a reimbursement under the Program unless—

(A) the Commission provides the recipient with notice of the violation; and

(B) the recipient fails to cure the violation within 180 days after the Commission provides such notice.

#### (c) Recovery of funds

The Commission shall immediately take action to recover all reimbursement funds awarded to a recipient of a reimbursement under the Program in any case in which such recipient is required to repay reimbursement funds under subsection (b)(1)(A).

(Pub. L. 116–124, §7, Mar. 12, 2020, 134 Stat. 167.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Communications Act of 1934, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b)(1), is act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, 48 Stat. 1064, which is classified principally to chapter 5 (§151 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 609 of this title and Tables.
#### Herbert Gilbert et al., Respondents, v. Workman’s Circle *Camp*of the New York Branches, Inc., Appellant.

Motion for reargument and for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals referred to the court that rendered the decision. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur. Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court *729of Appeals denied. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
### **CHAPTER 213—PENALTIES**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—CIVIL PENALTIES

Sec.
21301.
Chapter 201 general violations.
21302.
Chapter 201 accident and incident violations and chapter 203–209 violations.
21303.
Chapter 211 violations.
21304.
Willfulness requirement for penalties against individuals.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—CRIMINAL PENALTIES

21311.
Records and reports.
**From File WorkSheet.wst**  **Full Precision Full Precision**  **OFF**

**Confidence Coefficient 0.95** 

**Number of Valid Observations 19638**  **Number of Distinct Observations 2748**  **Minimum 0.1**  **Maximum 4013**  **Mean of Raw Data 118.9**  **Standard Deviation of Raw Data 72.29**  **Kstar 2.002**  **Mean of Log Transformed Data 4.508**  **Standard Deviation of Log Transformed Data 0.979** 

**Correlation Coefficient R 0.92**  **Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.0502**  **Lilliefors Critical (0.95) Value 0.00632** 

**Correlation Coefficient R 0.922**  **A-D Test Statistic 5.092E+26**  **A-D Critical (0.95) Value 0.767**  **K-S Test Statistic 0.0887**  **K-S Critical(0.95) Value 0.0184** 

**Correlation Coefficient R 0.871**  **Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.152**  **Lilliefors Critical (0.95) Value 0.00632**
### §321. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, acts Jan. 27, 1905, ch. 277, §2, 33 Stat. 616; May 14, 1906, ch. 2458, §2, 34 Stat. 192, which related to establishment of Board of Road Commissioners and its composition, was omitted in view of admission of Alaska into the Union.