alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 990.145 Dwelling units with approved vacancies. ( a ) A PHA is eligible to receive operating subsidy for vacant public housing units for each unit month the units are under an ACC and meet one of the following HUD-approved vacancies: ( 1 ) *Units undergoing modernization.* Vacancies resulting from project modernization or unit modernization (such as work necessary to reoccupy vacant units) provided that one of the following conditions is met: ( i ) The unit is undergoing modernization (*i.e.*, the modernization contract has been awarded or force account work has started) and must be vacant to perform the work, and the construction is on schedule according to a HUD-approved PHA Annual Plan; or
( ii ) The unit must be vacant to perform the work and the treatment of the vacant unit is included in a HUD-approved PHA Annual Plan, but the time period for placing the vacant unit under construction has not yet expired. The PHA shall place the vacant unit under construction within two federal fiscal years (FFYs) after the FFY in which the capital funds are approved.
( 2 ) *Special use units.* Units approved and used for resident services, resident organization offices, and related activities, such as self-sufficiency and anti-crime initiatives.
( b ) On a project-by-project basis, subject to prior HUD approval and for the time period agreed to by HUD, a PHA shall receive operating subsidy for the units affected by the following events that are outside the control of the PHA: ( 1 ) *Litigation.* Units that are vacant due to litigation, such as a court order or settlement agreement that is legally enforceable; units that are vacant in order to meet regulatory and statutory requirements to avoid potential litigation (as covered in a HUD-approved PHA Annual Plan); and units under voluntary compliance agreements with HUD or other voluntary compliance agreements acceptable to HUD (*e.g.*, units that are being held vacant as part of a court-order, HUD-approved desegregation plan, or voluntary compliance agreement requiring modifications to the units to make them accessible pursuant to 24 CFR part 8).
( 2 ) *Disasters.* Units that are vacant due to a federally declared, state-declared, or other declared disaster.
( 3 ) *Casualty losses.* Damaged units that remain vacant due to delays in settling insurance claims.
( c ) A PHA may appeal to HUD to receive operating subsidy for units that are vacant due to changing market conditions (see subpart G of this part—Appeals).
#### In re HUNT.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 27, 1903.)

In the matter of the proceedings for the disbarment of Dennis W. Hunt, an attorney and counselor at law.

No opinion. Order to show cause, returnable March 10, 1903, entered.
§ 1218.305 How do I pay advanced royalties I owe under BLM regulations? If you pay advanced royalties under 43 CFR 3212.15(a)(1) to retain your lease: ( a ) You must pay an advanced royalty monthly equal to the average monthly royalty you paid under 30 CFR part 1206, subpart H (including the amount against which you applied the annual rental as a credit) for the last 3 years the lease was producing. If your lease has been producing for less than 3 years, then use the average monthly royalty payment for the entire period your lease has been producing continuously;
( b ) The ONRR must receive your advanced royalty payment before the end of each full calendar month in which no production occurs;
( c ) You may credit any advanced royalty you pay against production royalties you owe after your lease resumes production. You may not reduce the amount of any production royalty paid for any year below zero.
[72 FR 24468, May 2, 2007]
Exhibit 4.74
 
 Confidential treatment has been requested for portions of this exhibit. The copy filed herewith
omits the information subject to the confidentiality request. Omissions are designated as ***. A
complete version of this exhibit has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
    
         satellite
  Party A: Shenzhen Securities Information Co., Ltd SEAL: /s/company sealAddress: F6, Building 10, Shangbu Industrial Zone, Honglixi road,Futian District, ShenzhenTel: 86-755-83276743
    
    Representative to sign:Fax: 86-755-83201393
    
    Date: March 7, 2011Bank of deposit and account No.: Futian Branch of Merchants BankParty B: Fortune Software (Beijing) Co., Ltd. SEAL: /s/company sealAddress: Floor 9, Tower C, Corporate Square, No. 35 Financial Street,Xicheng District, Beijing 100033, ChinaTel: 86-10-58325388
    
    Representative to sign:Fax: 86-10-58325300
    
    Date: March 7, 2011
 ***
    
    - indicates material omitted pursuant to a Confidential Treatment Request and filed separately
with the Securities and Exchange Commission
|                                                                                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                   |
| /s/     DANIEL C. USTIAN         |
| Daniel C. UstianChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)      |
#### V. P. Mason, Inc., Plaintiff, and Gramercy Construction Corp., Appellant, v. Aetna Insurance Company et al., Defendants, and V. P. Mason, Inc., Respondent. Aetna Insurance Company et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Gramercy Construction Corp., Third-Party Defendant.

Judgment, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent. No opinion. Concur-—Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted), Bruce D. Horn, Chief Financial Officer of Oplink
Communications, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:

1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
30, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the
"Quarterly Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition at the end of the period covered by
the Quarterly Report and results of operations of the Company for the periods
covered by the Quarterly Report.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hands hereto as of the 12th day
of November, 2004.

/s/ Bruce D. Horn
-------------------------------
Bruce D. Horn
Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.
121 STAT. 2460 PUBLIC LAW 110–165—DEC. 26, 2007 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3974: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007): 

Nov. 13, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 19, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–165 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 797 Sam 

Bass Road in Round Rock, Texas, as the ‘‘Marine Corps Corporal Steven P. 

Gill Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. MARINE CORPS CORPORAL STEVEN P. GILL POST OFFICE 

BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 797 Sam Bass Road in Round Rock, Texas, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Marine Corps Corporal 

Steven P. Gill Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Marine Corps Corporal Steven P. Gill Post Office Building’’. 

Approved December 26, 2007. 

Dec. 26, 2007 

[H.R. 3974] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29 with PUBLIC LAWS
### PART D—HIGH-SPEED RAIL

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior part D, consisting of chapter 261, was redesignated part E of this subtitle by Pub. L. 103–440, title I, §103(a)(1), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4616.
#### In the Matter of Michael Osetek, Respondent, v Merkibeth H. Smith, as Assessor for the Town of Monroe, Appellant.

In a proceeding to review a tax assessment on real property, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated June 8, 1976, which denied appellant’s motion (1) for summary judgment and (2) to stay the trial until it completes its audit. Order modified by deleting therefrom the provision denying the branch of the motion which sought to stay the trial and substituting therefor a provision granting the said branch of the motion. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The stay shall be effective for a period of 60 days from the date of the order to be made hereon. Under the particular circumstances of this case, the appellant should be given the opportunity to perform an audit of the petitioner’s books and records (cf. 22 NYCRR 678.3 [b]). Titone, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Margett, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 21.1

<TABLE>
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<CAPTION>
                                                   Jurisdiction of
                    Entity                          Organization            Name Under Which Subsidiary Does Business
------------------------------------------------ ------------------- -------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                    <C>           <C>
Alaska United Fiber System Partnership                 Alaska        Alaska United Fiber System Partnership, Alaska United
                                                                     Fiber System, Alaska United

Fiber Hold Co., Inc.                                   Alaska        Fiber Hold Co., Inc., Fiber Hold Company

GCI Communication Corp.                                Alaska        GCI, GCC, GCICC, GCI Communication Corp.

GCI, Inc.                                              Alaska        GCI, GCI, Inc.

GCI Cable, Inc.                                        Alaska        GCI Cable, GCI Cable, Inc.

GCI Fiber Co., Inc.                                    Alaska        GCI Fiber Co., Inc., GCI Fiber Company

GCI Holdings, Inc.                                     Alaska        GCI Holdings, Inc.

GCI Satellite Co., Inc.                                Alaska        GCI Satellite Co., Inc., GCI Satellite Company

GCI Transport Co., Inc.                                Alaska        GCI Transport Co., Inc., GCI Transport Company

Potter View Development Co., Inc.                      Alaska        Potter View Development Co., Inc.

GCI Cablesystems of Alaska, Inc.                       Alaska        GCI Cablesystems of Alaska, Inc., Rogers Cable

GCI American Cablesystems, Inc.                        Delaware      GCI American Cablesystems, Inc.

GCI Fiber Communication, Co., Inc.                     Alaska        GCI Fiber Communication, Co., Inc., GFCC,  Kanas
   (85% ownership)
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1


Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and


Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code


In connection with the Annual Report of OHA Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steve T. Wayne, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:


|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 15, 2016/s/ STEVEN T. WAYNESteven T. WaynePresident and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to OHA Investment Corporation and will be retained by OHA Investment Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeals of --

ProTek Models, LLC 

Under Contract No. FA8601-12-P-0461 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA Nos. 59796, 59936 

Richard G. Osborn, Esq. 

OsbornLaw 

Ontario, CA 

Jeffrey P. Hildebrant, Esq. 

Air Force Deputy Chief Trial Attorney 

Phillip E. Reiman, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 23 January 2017 

Administ tive Judge 

Armed S rvices Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 59796, 59936, Appeals of 

ProTek Models, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
#### State of Minnesota *vs.*William P. Hoag and another.

May 22, 1876.

Criminal Practice — What Cases may he *Certified.*— State v. *Byrud (ante*p. 29) followed, and applied to this case.

Case certified by the district court for Wabasha county, *Mitchell,*J., presiding.

*Geo. P. Wilson,*Attorney General, for the State.

‘ *Wilson & Taylor,*for defendants.

Berry, J.

This case must follow *State*v. *Byrud (ante**32p. 29.) The first question certified arose upon an objection to the introduction of evidence under the indictment. The second question certified arose upon a motion for an instruction to the jury. As it does not appear that the defendants were convicted, the case does not fall within the provisions of Laws 1870, c. 76, § 1, under which it is attempted to b.c brought to this court. It is further to be observed that it does not appear that the questions raised were passed upon or determined by the court below.

Proceedings dismissed.1

1

 State of Minnesota *vs.*A. G. Wedge. (June 26, 1876.)

Gileillan, O. J. This case stands in the same position as *State v. Byrud*and *State*v. *Hoag,*disposed of at this term. It comes here without any decision of the court below, and this court has no jurisdiction over it, and it must be dismissed. It will, therefore, be remanded to the court below for its action.

*John A. Lovely,*for the State.

*Stacy & Tyrer,*for defendant.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3456

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for individuals serving 

as Federal jurors to continue to receive their normal average wage 

or salary during such service. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 27, 2005

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for individuals serving as Federal jurors to continue to receive 

their normal average wage or salary during such service.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONTINUATION OF WAGES OR SALARY FOR IN4 DIVIDUALS SERVING AS FEDERAL JURORS. 

5 (a) CONTINUATION OF WAGES OR SALARY.—Section 

6 1877 of title 28, United States Code, is amended—

7 (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as sub8 section (c); and 
2

•HR 3456 IH 

1 (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the fol2 lowing new subsection: 

3 ‘‘(b)(1) The employer of a Federal grand or petit 

4 juror shall pay to that juror, for each day during which 

5 that juror performs duty as a juror, a wage not less than 

6 the differential compensation specified in paragraph (2) 

7 less the aggregate amount, paid to the juror for that day, 

8 of any fees and allowances under section 1871. 

9 ‘‘(2) The differential compensation referred to 

10 in paragraph (1) means—

11 ‘‘(A) if that juror has a regular employ12 ment schedule with that employer, the wage or 

13 salary that the juror would have been paid for 

14 that day under that schedule but for that ju15 ror’s performance of duty as a juror; or 

16 ‘‘(B) if that juror does not have a regular 

17 employment schedule with that employer, the 

18 average daily wage or salary of the juror during 

19 the 7-day period ending on the day before the 

20 juror first performed duty as a juror. 

21 ‘‘(3) For purposes of this subsection, the term 

22 ‘employer’ includes any public or private employer.’’. 

23 (b) SIGNIFICANT HARDSHIP TO EMPLOYER.—Para24 graph (1) of section 1866(c) of title 28, United States 

25 Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘or upon a showing by the 
3

•HR 3456 IH 

1 employer of the person that payment of differential com2 pensation under section 1877(b) would result in signifi3 cant hardship to the employer,’’ after ‘‘inconvenience,’’.

Æ
### §622. Optional electronic labeling of communications equipment

#### (a) Definitions

In this section—

(1) the term "electronic labeling" means displaying required labeling and regulatory information electronically; and

(2) the term "radiofrequency device with display" means any equipment or device that—

(A) is required under regulations of the Commission to be authorized by the Commission before the equipment or device may be marketed or sold within the United States; and

(B) has the capability to digitally display required labeling and regulatory information.

#### (b) Requirement to promulgate regulations for electronic labeling

Not later than 9 months after November 26, 2014, the Commission shall promulgate regulations or take other appropriate action, as necessary, to allow manufacturers of radiofrequency devices with display the option to use electronic labeling for the equipment in place of affixing physical labels to the equipment.

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title VII, §720, as added Pub. L. 113–197, §3, Nov. 26, 2014, 128 Stat. 2055.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Savings Clause

Pub. L. 113–197, §4, Nov. 26, 2014, 128 Stat. 2056, provided that: "The amendment made by section 3 [enacting this section] shall not be construed to affect the authority of the Federal Communications Commission under section 302 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 302a) to provide for electronic labeling of devices."

#### Findings

Pub. L. 113–197, §2, Nov. 26, 2014, 128 Stat. 2055, provided that: "Congress finds the following:

"(1) The Federal Communications Commission (referred to in this section as the 'Commission') first standardized physical labels for licensed products such as computers, phones, and other electronic devices in 1973, and the Commission has continually refined physical label requirements over time.

"(2) As devices become smaller, compliance with physical label requirements can become more difficult and costly.

"(3) Many manufacturers and consumers of licensed devices in the United States would prefer to have the option to provide or receive important Commission labeling information digitally on the screen of the device, at the discretion of the user.

"(4) An electronic labeling option would give flexibility to manufacturers in meeting labeling requirements."
### §1372. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–845, §26(b), Oct. 18, 1962, 76A Stat. 701

Section, acts July 8, 1937, ch. 443, §1, 50 Stat. 478; Sept. 26, 1950, ch. 1049, §2(a), (b), 64 Stat. 1038, related to relief of employee not entitled to retirement benefits.
EX-10.2




 Exhibit 10.2 

Description of Compensation Arrangements for Non-Management Directors 

As of November 10, 2022 
 The following is a
description of the compensation arrangements for the non-management directors of Constellation Brands, Inc. The Company’s annual compensation program for
non-management directors for their service as directors consists of a board cash retainer, a non-executive board chair cash retainer, a lead director cash retainer,
chair fees, restricted stock units, non-qualified stock options, an annual product allowance, and a matching charitable contribution program. 

The board cash retainer consists of an annual retainer equal to $100,000 paid in quarterly installments. The
non-executive board chair cash retainer consists of an annual retainer equal to $185,000 to be paid to the Board’s non-executive chair, if any, payable in quarterly
installments. The lead director cash retainer consists of a $30,000 annual cash retainer to be paid to the Board’s lead director, if any, payable in quarterly installments. The chair fees consist of annual fees of $20,000 for the positions of
chair of the Audit Committee and chair of the Human Resources Committee, and $15,000 for the chair of the Corporate Governance and Responsibility Committee, which are paid in quarterly installments. 

Long-term incentive awards in the form of stock options and restricted stock units granted under the Company’s Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan are another
element of non-management director compensation. As approved by the Board of Directors, each non-management director receives the following annually: 

 

	 	1.	 A non-qualified stock option grant with a grant date fair value of
$55,000 computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. 


  

	 	2.	 A restricted stock unit award with a grant date fair value of $115,000. (Each restricted stock unit represents
a contingent right to receive one share of the Company’s Class A Common Stock.) 


 The value of long-term incentive awards is pro-rated for new directors. While the Board has the flexibility to determine at the time of each grant the vesting provisions for any grant, whether on-cycle or off-cycle, stock options generally vest six (6) months following the date of grant and restricted stock units generally vest on July 10th following the date
of grant. The Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, Amended and Restated as of July 18, 2017, is filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 18, 2017 and filed
July 20, 2017. 
 Non-management directors are reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in connection with
their attendance at Board and Committee meetings. They also receive an annual product allowance in the form of a $10,000 cash payment and are eligible to participate in the Company’s charitable matching contribution program whereby they can
direct all or a portion of the Company’s charitable matching contributions not in excess of $5,000. 
 Members of the Board of Directors who are
members of management serve without receiving any additional fees or other compensation for their service on the Board.