alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION






<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of ASPI,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending  September 30, 2009 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report")  I, Look  Yuen  Ling,
Principal  Executive Officer,  President,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to 18 USC section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: November 13, 2009

Name: Look Yuen Ling

/s/ Look Yuen Ling
--------------------------------
Look Yuen Ling, (Principal Executive & Financial Officer,
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Robert E. Sulentic, certify that:

1.                I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q/Aof Trammell Crow Company;

2.                Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)                Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)               Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)                Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of  theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a)                All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)               Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: November 19, 2004 | /s/ ROBERT E. SULENTIC     |
|------------------------------|----------------------------|
|                         | Robert E.  Sulentic        |
| * *                     | *Chief  Executive Officer* |

 

 

----
#### § 81.18 Affordability—Income level definitions—family size not known (actual or prospective tenants).

In determining whether a rental unit is affordable to very-low, low-, or moderate-income families where family size is not known to the GSE, income will be adjusted using unit size, and affordability determined as follows:

(a) *For moderate-income,* the income of prospective tenants shall not exceed the following percentages of area median income with adjustments, depending on unit size:

| Unit size | Percentage of area median income |
| --- | --- |
| Efficiency | 70 |
| 1 bedroom | 75 |
| 2 bedrooms | 90 |
| 3 bedrooms or more | (\*) |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| \*104% plus (12% multiplied by the number of bedrooms in excess of 3). | |

(b) *For low-income,* income of prospective tenants shall not exceed the following percentages of area median income with adjustments, depending on unit size:

| Unit size | Percentage of area median income |
| --- | --- |
| Efficiency | 56 |
| 1 bedroom | 60 |
| 2 bedrooms | 72 |
| 3 bedrooms or more | (\*) |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| \*83.2% plus (9.6% multiplied by the number of bedrooms in excess of 3). | |

(c) *For very-low-income,* income of prospective tenants shall not exceed the following percentages of area median income with adjustments, depending on unit size:

| Unit size | Percentage of area median income |
| --- | --- |
| Efficiency | 42 |
| 1 bedroom | 45 |
| 2 bedrooms | 54 |
| 3 bedrooms or more | (\*) |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| \*62.4% plus (7.2% multiplied by the number of bedrooms in excess of 3). | |

(d) *For especially-low-income,* income of prospective tenants shall not exceed the following percentages of area median income with adjustments, depending on unit size:

| Unit size | Percentage of area median income |
| --- | --- |
| Efficiency | 35 |
| 1 bedroom | 37.5 |
| 2 bedrooms | 45 |
| 3 bedrooms or more | (\*) |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| \* 52% plus (6.0% multiplied by the number of bedrooms in excess of 3). | |

[[60 FR 61888](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/60-FR-61888), Dec. 1, 1995, as amended at [65 FR 65089](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/65-FR-65089), Oct. 31, 2000]
#### In the Matter of Saul White, Petitioner, against Joseph H. Murphy et al., Constituting the State Tax Commission, Respondents.

Motion by Fred A. Williams, Henry N. Schroder, Jr. and Robert R. Havill for permission to file a brief *amicus curies*granted. Motion in all other respects denied. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTesting and Analysis of Sensor PortsThis Technical Publication summarizes the work focused on the testing and analysis of sensor ports. The tasks under this contract were divided into three areas: (1) Development of an Analytical Model, (2) Conducting a Set of Experiments, and (3) Obtaining Computational Solutions. Results from the experiment using both short and long sensor ports were obtained using harmonic, random, and frequency sweep plane acoustic waves. An amplification factor of the pressure signal between the port inlet and the back of the port is obtained and compared to models. Comparisons of model and experimental results showed very good agreement.Document ID20160006400Acquisition SourceMarshall Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsZhang, M.*(Alabama Univ. Huntsville, AL, United States)*Frendi, A.*(Alabama Univ. Huntsville, AL, United States)*Thompson, W.*(Alabama Univ. Huntsville, AL, United States)*Casiano, M. J.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredMay 18, 2016Publication DateMay 1, 2016Subject CategoryAcousticsReport/Patent NumberM-1412NASA/TP-2016-218222M16-5288Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20160006400.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.§1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund XI, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dean L. Cash, President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 28, 2011





/s/ Dean L. CashDean L. CashPresident and Chief Executive Officer ofATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Mary Dunne, Respondent, v Joseph J. McGuirk et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered August 24, 1973 in Rensselaer County, which granted a motion by plaintiff to restore the action to the Trial Calendar and denied defendants’ motion to confirm the dismissal of the action. This action was commenced by the service of a summons and complaint, verified November 6,1959. In 1968, defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint and in 1969 the motion was denied. The action was placed on the Deferred Calendar in September, 1971. In September, 1972, the action was struck from the calendar pursuant to CPLR 3404 and rule 861.16 of the Appellate Division, Third Department (22 NYCRR 861.16). By a notice of motion dated May 3, 1973, plaintiff moved to open her default and have the action restored to the calendar. The motion was granted while defendants’ motion to confirm dismissal of the action was denied. This appeal ensued. In seeking to open the default and restore the action to the Trial Calendar, plaintiff was required to show that her action was meritorious, excusable neglect for her default, and lack of prejudice to the defendants *(Hickey v Shumacher,*54 AD2d 790). Plaintiff’s attorney, in support of the motion, stated in an affidavit that in April, 1972 he and defendants’ attorney discussed settlement and that thereafter he was requested by defendants’ attorney to "hold off”. Such a request is denied by defendants’ attorney in his affidavit. No date is given as to when the request to "hold off” was made, how it was made, nor for how long a period of time the request was made. In our view, the settlement negotiations are in themselves an insufficient excuse (see *McNamara v Hutchinson,*33 AD2d 26). It is the opinion of this court, upon review of the entire record, that plaintiff has failed to show excusable neglect for her default and, therefore, the order must be reversed. Order reversed, .on the law and the facts, plaintiff’s motion to restore the action to the Trial Calendar denied, and defendants’ motion to confirm dismissal of the action granted, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Sweeney, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.2
   Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  The Board of Directors
 Tengion, Inc.:
  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-166996) on Form S-8 of Tengion, Inc. of our report dated May 29, 2009, with respect to the statements of operations, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows of Tengion, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008 and for the period from July 10, 2003 (inception) through December 31, 2008, which  report appears in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of Tengion, Inc.
  /s/ KPMG LLP
  Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
 March 30, 2011
### §51510. Deferment of service obligation under student incentive payment agreements

The Secretary of Transportation may defer the service commitment of an individual under section 51509(d)(5) of this title (as specified in the agreement under section 51509) for not more than 2 years if the individual is engaged in a graduate course of study approved by the Secretary. However, deferment of service as a commissioned officer on active duty must be approved by the Secretary of the affected military department (or the Secretary of Commerce, for service with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration).

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(b), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1581.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 51510 | 46 App.:1295c(g)(7). | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title XIII, §1304(g)(7), as added Pub. L. 96–453, §2, Oct. 15, 1980, 94 Stat. 2006; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(145)(B), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 166; Pub. L. 108–136, title XXXV, §3515(d)(7), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1795. |

Section

The words "affected military department" are substituted for "military department . . . which has jurisdiction over such service" for clarity and to eliminate unnecessary words.
Exhibit 99.2









Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Management of Protective Life Insurance Company and The Bank of New York, as Indenture Trustee of Protective
Life Secured Trust 2004-33, (collectively the "Management")
and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee of Protective Life Secured Trust 2004-33 (the "Trust"):

We have examined Management's assertion, included in the accompanying "Management Assertion Regarding the Collection and Distribution of Trust Money by The Bank of New York (Indenture Trustee)," that the collection of payments on the funding agreements and distribution of payments to the noteholders has occurred as required by Section 5.02 of the Indenture agreement dated November 7, 2003 between the Trust and the Indenture Trustee during the year ended December 31, 2004.  Management is responsible for the assertion.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting management's assertion and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, Management's assertion referred to above is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the criteria defined in the accompanying "Management Assertion Regarding the Collection and Distribution of Trust Money by The Bank of New York (Indenture Trustee)."



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Birmingham, AlabamaMarch 30, 2005











Management Assertion Regarding the Collection and Distribution of Trust
Money by The Bank of New York (Indenture Trustee)





Management of the Trust asserts that it has collected payments on the funding agreements and distributed payments to the noteholders as required by Section 5.02 of the Indenture agreement dated November 7, 2003 between the Trust and the Indenture Trustee for the year ended December 31, 2004.  This assertion is based on the following criteria:

1. The payments made by Protective Life on the funding agreements that secured the Notes, for the year ended December 31, 2004, are included in Protective Life's Secured Trusts P & I Payments: 1/1/04 through 12/31/04 (P & I Payments report).
2. The payments made by Protective Life on the funding agreements that secured the Notes, for the year ended December 31, 2004, are included in the Indenture Trustee's History of Transactions List.
3. The amounts due on the Notes are reported as a component of the charges from Cede & Co., the nominee of the Depository Trust Company, on the Indenture Trustee's Payment Obligation Report System (PORS Report).
4. Charges from Cede & Co. are included in the Indenture Trustee's screen prints titled The Depository Trust Company Activity History Details, which represent the charge confirmations to Cede & Co., the nominee of the Depository Trust Company.
#### § 91.405 Housing and homeless needs assessment.

Housing and homeless needs must be described in the consolidated plan in accordance with the provisions of § 91.205 for the entire consortium. In addition to describing these needs for the entire consortium, the consolidated plan may also describe these needs for individual communities that are members of the consortium.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2506-0117)
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3113

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain cups, with or without saucers, 

of porcelain or china. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 29, 2005

Mr. KIRK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain cups, with or 

without saucers, of porcelain or china.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN CUPS, WITH OR WITHOUT SAUCERS, 

4 OF PORCELAIN OR CHINA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading:
2

•HR 3113 IH 

‘‘ 9902.09.55 Cups, with or without saucers, of porcelain or china, 

whether or not put up in 

sets, put up for mail order 

retail sale, and each weighing not over 1.36 kg together with their retail packaging (provided for in subheading 6911.10.52) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
### §1411. Reallocation of D block to public safety

#### (a) In general

The Commission shall reallocate the 700 MHz D block spectrum for use by public safety entities in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.

#### (b) Omitted

(Pub. L. 112–96, title VI, §6101, Feb. 22, 2012, 126 Stat. 205.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this Act", and was translated as reading "this title", meaning title VI of Pub. L. 112–96, Feb. 22, 2012, 126 Stat. 201, to reflect the probable intent of Congress. Title VI enacted this chapter and section 929 of this title, amended sections 309, 337, 614, 902, 923, 928, and 942 of this title, and enacted provisions set out as a note under section 1401 of this title.

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 6101 of Pub. L. 112–96. Subsec. (b) of section 6101 of Pub. L. 112–96 amended section 337 of this title.
**EXHIBIT 21**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF NEENAH PAPER, INC.**

 

The following is a list of subsidiaries of Neenah Paper, Inc., along with each entity’s place of incorporation or organization. Unless otherwise noted, the listed subsidiaries are wholly owned by Neenah Paper, Inc.

 

NPCC Holding Company, LLC, Delaware

 

Neenah Paper Company of Canada, Nova Scotia

 

Neenah Paper International Finance Company BV, Netherlands

 

Neenah Paper International Holding Company, LLC, Delaware

 

Neenah Paper Michigan, Inc., Delaware

 

Neenah and Menasha Water Power Company, Wisconsin (80%)

 

Neenah Paper International, LLC, Delaware

 

Neenah Gessner GmbH, Germany

 

Neenah Germany GmbH, Germany

 

Neenah Services GmbH&Co. KG

 

Neenah Lahnstein GmbH, Germany

 

Leiss—GmbH Co. KG, Germany

 

Neenah Lahnstein Grundstücksverwaltungsgesellschaft  mbH & Co. KG, Germany

 

Neenah Gessner Unterstützungskasse GmbH, Germany

 

Neenah Gessner Grundstückswaltungsverwaltungsgesellschaft  mbH & Co. KG, Germany

 

Neenah Paper FVC, Inc., Delaware

 

Neenah Paper FR, LLC, Delaware

 

----
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Bruce D. Horn, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Oplink Communications, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financing reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 13, 2005                                                         /s/ Bruce D. Horn   Bruce D. Horn   Chief Financial Officer