alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
165° 510000,

BATHYMETRIC MAP

5860000m.,N,

ALEUTIAN ISLANDS

ALEUTIAN TRENCH

5870000m-N

5770000n.N

59° | :
165° 500008 g,

Bathymetry compiled by the National Ocean Service (NOS) from Bathymetric Data other than
NOS hydrographic surveys. This is a facsimile reproduction of the bathymetric manuscript and
does not necessarily represent the final published form. This information is not intended for
navigational purposes.
Bathymetric Contour Intervals: 50 meters to maximum depth.
Universal Transverse Mercator Grid. Zone 3; 10,000 meter ticks (---) are shown inside the
neatline.
Protraction Diagram data shown in subdued (screened) black was compiled by the Minerals
Management Service (MMS).
THIS MAP IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT for Federal leasing purposes; for such purposes
use the MMS Outer Continental Shelf Official Protraction Diagrams.

Heavy line(s} indicate limits of these protraction diagrams. -

ZV NN INNOWWSS SNIBIS

Sipe

EVALUATION OF BATHYMETRIC DATA

Bathymetry compiled by the National Ocean Service from
Random Tracklines and Bathymetric Surveys dated 1944 to 1974.
The Bathymetric Data ranges in scale from 1:500,000 t
1:1,000,600 with a minimum line spacing of 3.0'and a maximum
line spacing of 15.0 nautical miles.

Data corrected for sound velocity according to Echo-Sounding
Correction Tables, 1980.

OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MAP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE

1985

Produced at Washington, D.C.
for

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE

TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION
Scale 1:250,000
10

0) 5 15 20 Statute Miles
E —
5 * oO 5 10 15 20 * 25
; —* 30 Kilometers
0 5 10 i 15 Nautical Miles
J

52°

BATHYMETRIC DATA INDEX

Bathymetric data from sources other than
'S hydrographic surveys.

152°
162°

ALEUTIAN TRENCH
NOS NN 3-8 (OCS)

168s INDEX TO ADJOINING SHEETS

DERICKSON
‘SEAMOUNT
NN 45

ALEUTIAN SIRIUS,

ae wees

PACIFIC OCEAN

Pawn sunk

mrs awe
#### The People of the State of New York v. Harry Bonnette.

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted to the extent and on the terms and conditions contained in the order of this court filed herein. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive
        - Bureau of Economic Analysis

#  Bureau of Economic Analysis 

**Collected by:** Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive 

**Archived since:**Jul, 2014

**Description:**
The Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) promotes a better understanding of the U.S. economy by providing the most timely, relevant, and accurate economic accounts data in an objective and cost-effective manner.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal,     	    Economics & Finance

**Creator:**    	    U.S. Department of Commerce

**Collector:**    	    U.S. Government Publishing Office

## Narrow Your Results

### 

            There are no further ways to narrow your results.           

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear

              - Sites
              - Search Page Text

Page 1 of 1  (8 Total Results)

**Sort By:**
                - Title (A-Z)
                - Title (Z-A)
                - URL (A-Z)
                - URL (Z-A)

### URL:     http://blog.bea.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     http://search.bea.gov

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://twitter.com/BEA_News/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.bea.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.youtube.com/user/BEAWebmaster/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.youtube.com/user/BEAWebmaster/videos

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUfn_WYabSs/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgLdKJV-g2g/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

Page 1 of 1  (8 Total Results)

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
#### § 1227.108 How will ONRR notify a State of its decision?

ONRR will notify you in writing of its decision on your delegation proposal. If ONRR approves your delegation proposal, then ONRR will hold discussions with you to develop a delegation agreement detailing the functions that you will perform, the standards and requirements you must comply with to perform those functions, and any required transition period.

[62 FR 43084, Aug. 12, 1997, as amended at 75 FR 61087, Oct. 4, 2010]
Editorial Note on Part 985
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 985 appear at 64 FR 67983, Dec. 3, 1999.

§ 985.107 Required actions for PHA with troubled performance rating. ( a ) *On-site reviews* — ( 1 ) *Required reviews for troubled PHAs.* Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, HUD will conduct an on-site review of PHA program management for any PHA assigned an overall performance rating of troubled to assess the magnitude and seriousness of the PHA's noncompliance with performance requirements.
( 2 ) *On-site reviews for small PHAs.* Notwithstanding paragraph (a)(1) of this section, HUD may elect not to conduct an on-site review of a troubled PHA, if: ( i ) The PHA has less than 250 assisted units; and
( ii ) HUD determines that an on-site review is unnecessary to determine the needs of the PHA and the actions required to address the program deficiencies.
( b ) *HUD written report.* HUD must provide the PHA a written report of its on-site review containing HUD findings of program management deficiencies, the apparent reasons for the deficiencies, and recommendations for improvement.
( c ) *PHA corrective action plan.* Upon receipt of the HUD written report on its on-site review, the PHA must write a corrective action plan and submit it to HUD for approval. The corrective action plan must: ( 1 ) Specify goals to be achieved;
( 2 ) Identify obstacles to goal achievement and ways to eliminate or avoid them;
( 3 ) Identify resources that will be used or sought to achieve goals;
( 4 ) Identify an PHA staff person with lead responsibility for completing each goal;
( 5 ) Identify key tasks to reach each goal;
( 6 ) Specify time frames for achievement of each goal, including intermediate time frames to complete each key task; and
( 7 ) Provide for regular evaluation of progress toward improvement.
( 8 ) Be signed by the PHA board of commissioners chairperson and by the PHA executive director. If the PHA is a unit of local government or a state, the corrective action plan must be signed by the Section 8 program director and by the chief executive officer of the unit of government or his or her designee.
( d ) *Monitoring.* The PHA and HUD must monitor the PHA's implementation of its corrective action plan to ensure performance targets are met.
( e ) *Use of administrative fee reserve prohibited.* Any PHA assigned an overall performance rating of troubled may not use any part of the administrative fee reserve for other housing purposes (see 24 CFR 982.155(b)).
( f ) *Upgrading poor performance rating.* HUD shall change an PHA's overall performance rating from troubled to standard or high performer if HUD determines that a change in the rating is warranted because of improved PHA performance and an improved SEMAP score.
(Information collection requirements in this section have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2577-0215) [63 FR 48555, Sept. 10, 1998, as amended at 68 FR 37672, June 24, 2003]
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Bruce D. Horn, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Oplink Communications, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financing reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 10, 2005          /s/ Bruce D. Horn   Bruce D. Horn  Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.2(b)


 


Complete Waiver of Compensation
Upon Termination


 


 


I, John Grdina, (“Employee”),
as of November 08, 2022, hereby agree to waive and terminate the shares of Adamas One stock and compensation due under Section 9(d) of
my Executive Employment Agreement with Adamas One Corp. (“Employer”) as follows:


 


Compensation upon Termination.
In the event that the Company terminates the Executive’s employment hereunder due to a Termination “for cause,” the
Executive shall be entitled to any Base Salary, unpaid bonus, reimbursable expenses and benefits owing to Executive through the day on
which Executive is terminated plus 90 days. Except as otherwise contemplated by this Agreement, Executive will not be entitled to any
other compensation upon termination “for cause” of this Agreement. If Executive is terminated “without cause”
or if this Agreement is terminated by Executive, Executive is entitled any Base Salary, unpaid bonus, reimbursable expenses and benefits
owing to Executive through the day on which Executive is terminated plus 90 days, Full Compensation (as herein defined) plus a severance
payment comprising of 200% of his annual Base Salary for the year of termination and 1,000,000 shares of the common stock of the Company.
“Full Compensation” shall mean all total executive compensation accruable under this Agreement, which shall include
payment of all accruable Base Salary, Equity Compensation and Performance Bonuses that is payable to Executive under this Agreement as
if earned in full.


 


If and when I am terminated
by the Employer, I hereby irrevocably waive any and all claims, demands, suits, actions, causes of action and rights whatsoever at law
or in equity, now existing or arising relating to this Complete Waiver of Compensation Upon Termination.


 


 


 


AGREED AND ACCEPTED TO:


 


	/s/ John Grdina	 
	John Grdina
1



# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 15

- 927 V

Filed: September 21 , 2016

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED

SARAH HENLEY, *

*

Petitioner, * Special Master Hamilton

- Fieldman

v. *

* Joint Stipulation of Dismissal ;

* Postural Tachycardia Syndrome

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“POTS”).

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Kelly D. Burdette

, Burkett & Burdette

, Seattle, WA

, for petitioner.

Voris E. Johnson , United States Dep ar t ment of Justice, Washington, DC for respondent.

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS 1

On September 21, 2016 , the parties filed a joint stipulation of dismissal requesting that this

claim be dismissed pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a) (1)(b) . In accordance with this rule, this case is

hereby dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is instructed that judgment shall not

enter in the instant case pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 21( a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Lisa Hamilton

- Fieldman

Lisa Hamilton

- Fieldman

Special Master

1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case,

the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal

Claims, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012 ) (Federal

Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). As provided by Vaccine Rule

18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by

that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or fi nancial in substance and is privileged or

confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would

constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b).
### **CHAPTER 9—INTERCEPTION OF DIGITAL AND OTHER COMMUNICATIONS**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—INTERCEPTION OF DIGITAL AND OTHER COMMUNICATIONS

Sec.
1001.
Definitions.
1002.
Assistance capability requirements.
1003.
Notices of capacity requirements.
1004.
Systems security and integrity.
1005.
Cooperation of equipment manufacturers and providers of telecommunications support services.
1006.
Technical requirements and standards; extension of compliance date.
1007.
Enforcement orders.
1008.
Payment of costs of telecommunications carriers to comply with capability requirements.
1009.
Authorization of appropriations.
1010.
Reports.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER COMPLIANCE PAYMENTS

1021.
Department of Justice Telecommunications Carrier Compliance Fund.
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                 CERTIFICATION
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES
                                     CODE)

    Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code) (the "Sarbanes-Oxley Act"), the undersigned officer of Liberty
Satellite & Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does
hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of March 31,
2003 and December 31, 2002, and for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and
2002.

<Table>
<S>                                                       <C>
Dated: May 15, 2003                                       /s/ KENNETH G. CARROLL
                                                          --------------------------------------------
                                                          Kenneth G. Carroll
                                                          President and Chief Financial Officer
</Table>

    The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not being filed as part of the
Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this
written statement required by section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §3717. Marine safety information system

(a) The Secretary shall establish a marine safety information system that shall contain information about each vessel to which this chapter applies that operates on the navigable waters of the United States, or that transfers oil or hazardous material in a port or place under the jurisdiction of the United States. In acquiring this information, the Secretary shall make full use of publicly available information. The Secretary may by regulation require the vessel to provide information that the Secretary considers necessary to carry out this subsection, including—

(1) the name of each person with an ownership interest in the vessel;

(2) details of compliance with the financial responsibility requirements of applicable laws or regulations;

(3) registration information, including all changes in the name of the vessel;

(4) the history of marine casualties and serious repair problems of the vessel; and

(5) a record of all inspections and examinations of a vessel conducted under section 3714 of this title.

(b) On written request from the Secretary, the head of each department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States Government shall provide available information that the Secretary considers necessary to confirm the information received under subsection (a) of this section.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 527.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 3717 | 46:391a(16) |

Section 3717 requires the Secretary to establish a marine safety information system which is to contain selected information on any tank vessel, foreign or domestic, that comes within the jurisdiction of the United States. This information must be recorded and maintained up-to-date and is available from a number of sources. In some instances, this information is required as a condition of entry. This information shall include certain ownership interests, financial responsibility information, all registered names that the vessel has had since it was built, the present and prior countries of registry, history of accidents or serious repair problems, record of the various inspections or examinations required, and any other data the Secretary deems appropriate to carry out the intent of the section. The section also provides for interagency cooperation and the furnishing of available data and information.
#### North American Specialty Insurance Company et al., Respondents, v Thomas Schwanter et al., Respondents, and Ritz Camera Centers, Inc., Doing Business as Boaters World Discount Marine, Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[831 NYS2d 725]

In a subrogation action to recover for property damage and loss of business, the defendant Ritz Camera Centers, Inc., doing business as Boaters World Discount Marine, appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, Jr., J.), entered August 1, 2005, as denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ causes of action sounding in negligence insofar as asserted against it.

*511Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the order entered August 1, 2005, must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action *(see Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from that order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the amended judgment *(see*CPLR 5501 [a] [1]; *North Am. Specialty Ins. Co. v Schwanter,*39 AD3d 511 [2007] [decided herewith]). Rivera, J.E, Ritter, Goldstein and Angiohllo, JJ., concur.
### §107. Exclusive economic zone

In this title, the term "exclusive economic zone" means the zone established by Presidential Proclamation 5030 of March 10, 1983 (16 U.S.C. 1453 note).

(Pub. L. 109–304, §4, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1487.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 107 | 46:2101(10a). | |

Section
#### THOMAS J. JEFFREYS *v.*BOARD OF ASSESSMENTS OF THE CITY OF WATERBURY

(AC 25043)

Lavery, C. J., and McLachlan and Gruendel, Js.

Submitted on briefs April 1

officially released May 3, 2005

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Universal Vending Service Company, appellee, v. L. Adduci, also known as Louis Adduci, appellant.

Gen. No. 28,576.

Consolidated with No. 28,578 ante. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Henry M. Walker, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed November 27, 1923.

Per Curiam.
### §70014. Aiming laser pointer at vessel

(a) Prohibition.—It shall be unlawful to cause the beam of a laser pointer to strike a vessel operating on the navigable waters of the United States.

(b) Exceptions.—This section shall not apply to a member or element of the Department of Defense or Department of Homeland Security acting in an official capacity for the purpose of research, development, operations, testing, or training.

(c) Laser Pointer Defined.—In this section the term "laser pointer" means any device designed or used to amplify electromagnetic radiation by stimulated emission that emits a beam designed to be used by the operator as a pointer or highlighter to indicate, mark, or identify a specific position, place, item, or object.

(Added Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXIII, §8342(a), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4709.)