alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 92.505 Applicability of uniform administrative requirements.

The requirements of 2 CFR part 200 apply to participating jurisdictions, State recipients, and subrecipients receiving HOME funds, except for the following provisions: §§ 200.306, 200.307, 200.308 (not applicable to participating jurisdictions), 200.311 (except as provided in § 92.257), 200.312, 200.329, 200.333, and 200.334. The provisions of 2 CFR 200.305 apply as modified by § 92.502(c). If there is a conflict between definitions in 2 CFR part 200 and 24 CFR part 92, the definitions in 24 CFR part 92 govern.

[80 FR 75935, Dec. 7, 2015]
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive
        - Congressional Budget Office

#  Congressional Budget Office 

**Collected by:** Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive 

**Archived since:**Jan, 2016

**Description:**
Since 1975, CBO has produced independent analyses of budgetary and economic issues to support the Congressional budget process. Each year, the agency’s economists and budget analysts produce dozens of reports and hundreds of cost estimates for proposed legislation. CBO is strictly nonpartisan; conducts objective, impartial analysis; and hires its employees solely on the basis of professional competence without regard to political affiliation.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal,     	    American History & Political Science,     	    Economics & Finance

**Creator:**    	    Congressional Budget Office

**Language:**    	    English

**Collector:**    	    U.S. Government Publishing Office

## Narrow Your Results

### 

            There are no further ways to narrow your results.           

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear

              - Sites
              - Search Page Text

Page 1 of 1  (4 Total Results)

**Sort By:**
                - Title (A-Z)
                - Title (Z-A)
                - URL (A-Z)
                - URL (Z-A)

### URL:     https://twitter.com/uscbo/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.cbo.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.slideshare.net/cbo/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.youtube.com/uscbo/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

Page 1 of 1  (4 Total Results)

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the report) for the purpose of complying with
Rule 13a14(b) or Rule 15d14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Ray C. Dillon, the Chief Executive Officer, and Clefton D. Vaughan, the Chief Financial Officer, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

condition and results of operations of Deltic Timber Corporation.



/s/ Ray C. DillonRay C. DillonChief Executive OfficerNovember 7, 2006/s/ Clefton D. VaughanClefton D. VaughanChief Financial OfficerNovember 7, 2006
### §1452. Regulation of Indians

Nor shall anything in title 23 of the Revised Statutes be construed to affect the authority of the United States to make any regulations respecting the Indians of any Territory, their lands, property, or rights, by treaty, law, or otherwise, in the same manner as might be made if no temporary government existed, or is hereafter established, in any such Territory. As used herein, the term "Territory" does not include the Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, or the Northern Mariana Islands.

(R.S. §1840; Pub. L. 98–213, §15(b), Dec. 8, 1983, 97 Stat. 1462.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Title 23 of the Revised Statutes, referred to in text, was in the original "this Title", meaning title 23 of the Revised Statutes, consisting of R.S. §§1839 to 1976, and which, insofar as classified to the Code, is classified to sections 1451 to 1455, 1457 to 1460a, 1463, 1463a, 1465, 1467 to 1470, 1480, and 1482 to 1485 of this title and to sections 644 to 647, 649, and 655 to 657 of Title 16, Conservation. For complete classification of R.S. §§1839 to 1976 to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

R.S. §1840 derived from N.M., act Sept. 9, 1850, ch. 49, §2, 9 Stat. 447. Utah, act Sept. 9, 1850, ch. 51, §1, 9 Stat. 453. Wash., act Mar. 2, 1853, ch. 90, §1, 10 Stat. 172. Colo., act Feb. 28, 1861, ch. 59, §1, 12 Stat. 172. Dak., act Mar. 2, 1861, ch. 86, §1, 12 Stat. 239. Ariz., act Feb. 24, 1863, ch. 56, §1, 12 Stat. 664. Idaho, act Mar. 3, 1863, ch. 117, §1, 12 Stat. 808. Mont., act May 26, 1864, ch. 95, §1, 13 Stat. 85. Wyo., act July 25, 1868, ch. 235, §1, 15 Stat. 178.

#### Amendments

1983—Pub. L. 98–213 inserted provisions excluding from the term "Territory" the Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, or the Northern Mariana Islands.
§ 1219.104 What are Explanation of Payments to the States and Indian Tribes? ( a ) ONRR will describe the payments to States and BIA, on behalf of Indian Tribes or Indian allottees, discussed in this part, in ONRR-prepared Explanation of Payment reports. ONRR will prepare these reports at the lease level and will include a description of the type of payment made, the period covered by the payment, the source of the payment, sales amounts upon which the payment is based, the royalty rate, and the unit value. If any State or Indian Tribe needs additional information pertaining to mineral revenue payments, the State or Tribe may request this information from ONRR.
( b ) ONRR will provide these reports to: ( 1 ) States, not later than the 10th day of the month following the month in which ONRR disburses the State's share of royalties and related monies.
( 2 ) BIA, on behalf of Tribes and Indian allottees, not later than the 10th day of the month following the month in which ONRR disburses the funds.
( c ) ONRR will not include in these reports revenues that we cannot distribute to States, Tribes, or Indian allottees because the payor/lessee provided incorrect, inadequate, or incomplete information about the proper recipient of the payment, until the payor/lessee has submitted to ONRR the missing information.
Case 3:09-cv-01375-TEH Document 56 Filed 08/11/10 Page 1 of 2
10:00 am.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Thelton E. Henderson

08/11/10

Case 3:09-cv-01375-TEH Document 56 Filed 08/11/10 Page 2 of 2
### §51908. Prohibition against unauthorized manufacture, sale, possession, or display of awards

(a) Prohibition.—Except as authorized by this chapter or the Secretary of Transportation, a person may not manufacture, sell, possess, or display a decoration or medal provided for in this chapter.

(b) Civil Penalty.—A person violating this section is liable to the United States Government for a civil penalty of not more than $2,000.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(b), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1585; Pub. L. 109–364, div. C, title XXXV, §3510(b), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2520; Pub. L. 110–181, div. C, title XXXV, §3526(e), (g), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 602.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 51908 | 46 App.:2007. | Pub. L. 100–324, §8, May 30, 1988, 102 Stat. 577. |

Section

In subsection (b), the words "not more than" are added for clarity and for consistency in the revised title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–181, §3526(g), repealed Pub. L. 109–364, §3510(b). See 2006 Amendment note below.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 110–181, §3526(e), incorporated the substance of the amendment by Pub. L. 109–364, §3510(b), into this section by substituting "by this chapter or the Secretary of Transportation" for "under this chapter". See 2006 Amendment note below and section 18(a) of Pub. L. 109–304, set out as a Legislative Purpose and Construction note preceding section 101 of this title.

2006—Pub. L. 109–364, §3510(b), which directed the amendment of section 2007 of the former Appendix to this title from which this section was derived, was repealed by Pub. L. 110–181, §3526(g). See 2008 Amendment note for subsec. (a) and Historical and Revision notes above.
### §93. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Apr. 30, 1908, ch. 153, 35 Stat. 73, relating to transportation of Indian goods and supplies, was transferred to section 443b of Title 25, Indians, prior to editorial reclassification as a note under section 1457 of Title 43, Public Lands.
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive
        - FCSIC, Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

#  FCSIC, Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation 

**Collected by:** Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive 

**Archived since:**Jan, 2014

**Description:**
The Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation was established by the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 as an independent U.S. Government controlled corporation. The Corporation's primary purpose is to ensure the timely payment of principal and interest on insured notes, bonds, and other obligations issued on behalf of Farm Credit System banks.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal,     	    Economics & Finance

**Creator:**    	    Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

**Collector:**    	    U.S. Government Publishing Office

## Narrow Your Results

### 

            There are no further ways to narrow your results.           

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear

              - Sites
              - Search Page Text

Page 1 of 1  (4 Total Results)

**Sort By:**
                - Title (A-Z)
                - Title (Z-A)
                - URL (A-Z)
                - URL (Z-A)

### URL:     http://www.fcsic.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     http://www.fcsic.gov/FCSIC%20Accessibility.html

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.fcsic.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.linkedin.com/company/farm-credit-system-insurance-corporation/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

Page 1 of 1  (4 Total Results)

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
### Bauxite deposits of the Margerum district, Alabama

By: Harlan Richard BergquistElizabeth Claire Fischer Overstreet

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1199D

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Geologic map of the Margerum bauxite district, Colbert County, Alabama(1943)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### §1. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act July 1, 1902, ch. 1369, §87, 32 Stat. 712, provided that the Division of Insular Affairs of the War Department should be known as the Bureau of Insular Affairs and prescribed its business.

By Ex. Ord. No. 6726, eff. May 29, 1934, the Division of Territories and Island Possessions was established in the Department of the Interior, and the functions of the Bureau pertaining to the administration of the Government of Puerto Rico, together with the personnel, equipment and funds, were transferred thereto.

By Reorg. Plan No. II of 1939, §4(d), eff. July 1, 1939, 4 F.R. 2731, 53 Stat. 1433, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees. The Bureau of Insular Affairs of the War Department and its functions were transferred to the Department of the Interior and consolidated with the Division of Territories and Island Possessions, to be administered under the direction and supervision of the Secretary of the Interior. The office of the Chief of the Bureau and offices subordinate thereto provided for in section 14 of act June 4, 1920, ch. 227, 41 Stat. 769, were abolished and all their functions transferred to, and were to be exercised by, the Director of the Division of Territories and Island Possessions.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 15, 2009 

Order 

 

September 15, 2009 

139243 & (13) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC: 139243 

v CoA: 291838 

 Macomb CC: 08-4611-FH 

STEVEN PAUL SIMON, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_____________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, defendant-appellant having indicated in writing that 

he wishes to withdraw his application for leave to appeal, the application for leave to 

appeal is DISMSSED with prejudice and without costs.
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.1159 May the Regional Supervisor limit my well or reservoir production rates? ( a ) The Regional Supervisor may set a Maximum Production Rate (MPR) for a producing well completion, or set a Maximum Efficient Rate (MER) for a reservoir, or both, if the Regional Supervisor determines that an excessive production rate could harm ultimate recovery. An MPR or MER will be based on well tests and any limitations imposed by well and surface equipment, sand production, reservoir sensitivity, gas-oil and water-oil ratios, location of perforated intervals, and prudent operating practices.
( b ) If the Regional Supervisor sets an MPR for a producing well completion and/or an MER for a reservoir, you may not exceed those rates except due to normal variations and fluctuations in production rates as set by the Regional Supervisor.
### **CHAPTER 15—SECURE AND TRUSTED COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS**

Sec.
1601.
Determination of communications equipment or services posing national security risks.
1602.
Prohibition on use of certain Federal subsidies.
1603.
Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Reimbursement Program.
1604.
Reports on covered communications equipment or services.
1605.
Hold harmless.
1606.
Enforcement.
1607.
NTIA program for preventing future vulnerabilities.
1608.
Definitions.
1609.
Severability.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CB Richard Ellis Realty Trust (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack A. Cuneo, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|                                                   
|/S/    JACK A. CUNEO                               
|Jack A. Cuneo President and Chief
Executive Officer

March 31, 2010
#### § 905.302 Timely submission of the CF ACC amendment by the PHA.

Upon being provided with a CF ACC Amendment from HUD, the PHA must sign and date the CF ACC Amendment and return it to HUD by the date established. HUD will execute the signed and dated CF ACC Amendment submitted by the PHA. If HUD does not receive the signed and dated Amendment by the submission deadline, the PHA will receive the Capital Fund grant for that year; however, it will have less than 24 months to obligate 90 percent of the Capital Fund grant and less than 48 months to expend these funds because the PHA's obligation start date and disbursement end date for these grants will remain as previously established by HUD.
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TERRY ALEXANDER, 

Plaintiff,

v.

C.D.C. and ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER,

Defendants.                                                              /

No. C 09-1289 MHP (pr)

JUDGMENT 

This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative

remedies.  

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

Dated: July 23, 2010 ______________________ Marilyn Hall Patel

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01289-MHP   Document 33   Filed 07/23/10   Page 1 of 1
tse
Hh

a
i

iT

Frente of pects see

Toe ae mun

SS ee
#### Thomas H. Sullivan and another *vs.*Edward Murphy and another.

May 2, 1876.

Evidence — Partnership—Admission.—Where the fact of a partnership between the defendants is in issue, the admission of the fact by one of them is-proper evidence against himself.

Promise to Debtor to Pay his Debts. — Where a debtor transfers his property to another, who, in consideration thereof, promises to pay the debts of the former, the promise is not within the statute of frauds.

Corporation — Promissory Note. — A corporation created under Gen. St. *e.*34, title 2, may execute promissory notes to evidence debts which it may contract.

Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Hennepin county refusing a new trial, the action having been tried before Vanderburgh, J., without a jury.

*Atwater & Babcock,*for appellants,

argued that the Gen. St. *c.*34, title 2, does not authorize the corporations organized thereunder to issue commercial paper, citing *Rochester Ins. Co.*v. *Martin,*13 Minn. 59 ; *Bank of Augusta*v. *Earle,*13 Peters, 519, 587.

*A. E. Merrick,*for respondents.

Gileillan, C. J.

Action to recover the amount of a promissory note given to plaintiffs by a corporation created under Gen. St. c. 34, title 2, called the Trades Manufacturing Company. It is alleged by the plaintiffs, and found .by the court below, that the corporation transferred all its property to defendants, upon their undertaking and promise to assume and pay all its debts. The case made does not purport to contain all the evidence, and, therefore, we cannot consider whether the findings of fact are sustained by the evidence.

*7The admissions of Ira T. Murphy, of the fact of the partnership between himself and the other defendant, though they would not of themselves be sufficient to prove the partnership as to the other defendant, were proper evidence of it against him.

The promise of defendants, made to the corporation, to assume and pay its debts, is an original undertaking, and not a collateral one, and, therefore, not within the statute of frauds. *Goetz*v. *Foos,*14 Minn. 265, and cases cited.

The statute under which this corporation was incorporated authorizes, by implication at least, the corporations contemplated by it to create debts in the ordinary transaction of their business ; and, since the old rule that a corporation can only contract under its corporate seal has been relaxed so as not to apply to contracts in the daily and ordinary transaction of its business, there is no reason why such debts may not be evidenced by promissory notes. The note in question was, therefore, valid.

Order affirmed.