Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 234 / Friday, December 4, 2020 / Notices 78359 

Wade Oval Drive, Cleveland, OH 44106, 

telephone (216) 231–4600 Ext. 3301, 

email bredmond@cmnh.org or Amanda 

McGee, telephone (216) 231–4600 Ext. 

3275, email amcgee@cmnh.org. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is 

here given in accordance with the 

Native American Graves Protection and 

Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 

3005, of the intent to repatriate cultural 

items under the control of the Cleveland 

Museum of Natural History, Cleveland, 

OH, that meet the definition of 

unassociated funerary objects and 

sacred objects under 25 U.S.C. 3001. 

This notice is published as part of the 

National Park Service’s administrative 

responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 

U.S.C. 3003(d)(3). The determinations in 

this notice are the sole responsibility of 

the museum, institution, or Federal 

agency that has control of the Native 

American cultural items. The National 

Park Service is not responsible for the 

determinations in this notice. 

Consultation 

A detailed assessment of the cultural 

items was made by CMNH staff in 

consultation with representatives of the 

Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA). 

History and Description of the Cultural 

Items 

In 1935, six Hawaiian burial tapa 

cloths were removed from ancient 

Native Hawaiian corpses in burial caves 

on Hawai1i Island by Glenn W. Russ of 

the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum 

(BPBM). The exact location of the burial 

caves is unknown. At some time soon 

after the collection of the burial cloths, 

Russ transferred them to D’ Alte Welch, 

who also worked at BPBM. In 1976, 

Welch, who became a professor at John 

Carroll University in Ohio, donated the 

burial tapas to CMNH. The accession 

numbers for these six items are #1976– 

03: CMNH #s 8460, 8464, 8470, 8476, 

8480, 8482. Welch also donated to 

CMNH one 22-page scrapbook (CMNH 

#8458) containing burial tapa fragments. 

In the early 20th century, one cultural 

item, a ‘‘Hawaiian necklace’’ (lei niho 

palaoa) made of human hair, was 

acquired by Mrs. H.F. Lyman. It is 

unknown from where in Hawaii the lei 

niho palaoa had been removed or the 

circumstances of its removal. In 1922, 

Mrs. Lyman donated the lei niho palaoa 

to CMNH (accession #7, CMNH# 1682). 

CMNH has determined that the lei niho 

palaoa is authentic and is used in 

traditional Native Hawaiian religious 

ceremonies. 

Determinations Made by the Cleveland 

Museum of Natural History 

The Cleveland Museum of Natural 

History have determined that: 

• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(3)(B), 

the one 22-page scrapbook of burial tapa 

fragments and the six burial tapa cloths 

described above are reasonably believed 

to have been placed with or near 

individual human remains at the time of 

death or later as part of the death rite 

or ceremony and are believed, by a 

preponderance of the evidence, to have 

been removed from a specific burial site 

of Native Hawaiian individuals. 

• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(3)(C), 

the one lei niho palaoa described above 

is a specific ceremonial object needed 

by traditional Native Hawaiian religious 

leaders for the practice of traditional 

Native Hawaiian religions by their 

present-day adherents. 

• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there 

is a relationship of shared group 

identity that can be reasonably traced 

between the cultural objects and the 

Office of Hawaiian Affairs. 

Additional Requestors and Disposition 

Lineal descendants or representatives 

of any Native Hawaiian organization not 

identified in this notice that wish to 

submit a claim for these cultural items 

should submit a written request with 

information in support of the claim to 

Dr. Brian Redmond, Cleveland Museum 

of Natural History, 1 Wade Oval Drive, 

Cleveland, OH 44106, telephone (216) 

231–4600 Ext. 3301, email bredmond@

cmnh.org or Amanda McGee, telephone 

(216) 231–4600 Ext. 3275, email 

amcgee@cmnh.org, by January 4, 2021. 

After that date, if no additional 

claimants have come forward, transfer 

of control of the unassociated funerary 

objects and the sacred object to the 

Office of Hawaiian Affairs listed in this 

notice may proceed. 

The Cleveland Museum of Natural 

History is responsible for notifying the 

Office of Hawaiian Affairs that this 

notice has been published. 

Dated: November 24, 2020. 

Melanie O’Brien, 

Manager, National NAGPRA Program. 

[FR Doc. 2020–26762 Filed 12–3–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–52–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management 

Gulf of Mexico, Outer Continental 

Shelf, Geological and Geophysical 

Activities: Western, Central, and 

Eastern Planning Areas; Final 

Programmatic Environmental Impact 

Statement 

AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy 

Management, Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of availability of a record 

of decision. 

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Ocean Energy 

Management (BOEM) is announcing the 

availability of a Record of Decision for 

the final programmatic environmental 

impact statement (EIS) for proposed 

geological and geophysical (G&G) 

activities on the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) 

Outer Continental Shelf (OCS). This 

Record of Decision identifies BOEM’s 

selected alternative for conducting 

proposed G&G activities on the Gulf of 

Mexico OCS, which is analyzed in the 

Gulf of Mexico OCS Proposed 

Geological and Geophysical Activities: 

Western, Central, and Eastern Planning 

Areas; Final Programmatic 

Environmental Impact Statement 

(Programmatic EIS). The Record of 

Decision and associated information are 

available on BOEM’s website at http:// 

www.boem.gov//or https://

www.boem.gov/regions/gulf-mexico-ocsregion/resource-evaluation/gulf-mexicogeological-and-geophysical-gg. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

more information on the Record of 

Decision, you may contact Ms. Helen 

Rucker, Chief, Environmental 

Assessment Section, Office of 

Environment, by telephone at 504–736– 

2421 or by email at helen.rucker@

boem.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Programmatic EIS addresses potential 

environmental impacts of BOEM’s Oil 

and Gas, Renewable Energy, and Marine 

Minerals Programs, and focuses 

particularly on the environmental 

impacts of off-lease and on-lease 

geological (bottom sampling and test 

drilling) and geophysical (deeppenetration, high—resolution 

geophysical (HRG), electromagnetic, 

deep stratigraphic, and remote sensing) 

surveys. The area evaluated (i.e., Area of 

Interest or AOI) includes the OCS 

waters that are within BOEM’s Gulf of 

Mexico planning areas (i.e., Western, 

Central, and Eastern Planning Areas). 

The AOI also includes, for purposes of 

the analysis, the coastal waters of Texas, 

Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and 

Florida extending from the coastline 

78360 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 234 / Friday, December 4, 2020 / Notices 

outside of estuaries seaward 3 nautical 

miles (nmi) (3.5 miles [mi]; 5.6 

kilometers [km]) from Louisiana, 

Mississippi, and Alabama, or 9 nmi 

(10.4 mi; 16.7 km) from Texas and 

Florida to the limit of State jurisdiction. 

In the Programmatic EIS, BOEM 

evaluated seven alternatives. All but the 

No Action Alternative focused on 

mitigation measures to avoid or reduce 

the potential environmental impacts 

that could result from future G&G 

activities in the GOM. The 

Programmatic EIS and Record of 

Decision are available at https://

www.boem.gov/regions/gulf-mexico-ocsregion/resource-evaluation/gulf-mexicogeological-and-geophysical-gg. 

After careful consideration, the 

Record of Decision identifies BOEM’s 

selection of Alternative C of the 

Programmatic EIS. Under Alternative C, 

G&G activities would continue to be 

permitted and authorized, and would 

include the mitigation measures, 

monitoring, reporting, survey protocols, 

and guidance that were in place prior to 

the settlement agreement in Natural 

Resources Defense Council Ins., et al., v. 

Bernhardt, et al., Defendants and API, et 

al., Intervenor, Defendants, No. 2:10–cv– 

01882 (E.D. La.), as well as additional 

mitigation and temporal measures for 

survey protocols for seismic airgun and 

nonairgun HRG surveys. While BOEM is 

selecting Alternative C at this 

programmatic stage, rather than 

adopting the non-airgun, HRG survey 

protocol (as described in Appendix B of 

the Programmatic EIS), the protocol will 

be reserved, considered, and applied at 

the site-specific stage, on an as-needed 

basis, to further minimize the potential 

for injury to marine mammals and sea 

turtles. BOEM’s selection of the 

Preferred Alternative meets the purpose 

of and need for the proposed action, 

balances regional and national policy 

considerations, and includes 

appropriate measures to minimize 

potential environmental and 

socioeconomic impacts. This decision 

does not by itself authorize any 

activities. The mitigation measures 

contemplated in Alternative C may be 

supplemented by additional 

requirements or tailored as site-specific 

circumstances warrant in permits or 

other specific authorizations after 

BOEM completes additional 

environmental review. 

Authority: This Notice of Availability 

of a Record of Decision is published 

pursuant to the regulations (40 CFR part 

1503; 1978, as amended in 1986 and 

2005) implementing the provisions of 

the National Environmental Policy Act 

of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et 

seq.). 

Michael A. Celata, 

Regional Director, New Orleans Office. 

[FR Doc. 2020–26781 Filed 12–3–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1220] 

Certain Filament Light-Emitting Diodes 

and Products Containing Same (II); 

Notice of Commission Decision Not To 

Review an Initial Determination 

Granting a Motion to Intervene 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 14) of the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

granting a motion to intervene filed by 

non-party Signify North America Corp. 

(‘‘Signify’’). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Houda Morad, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–4716. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

October 5, 2020, the Commission 

instituted this investigation under 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 

337’’), based on a complaint filed by 

The Regents of the University of 

California (‘‘Complainant’’). See 85 FR 

62761–62 (Oct. 5, 2020). The complaint, 

as supplemented, alleges a violation of 

section 337 based upon the importation 

into the United States, the sale for 

importation, and the sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain filament light-emitting diodes 

and products containing the same by 

reason of infringement of certain claims 

of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,240,529; 9,859,464; 

10,593,854; 10,644,213; and 10,658,557. 

See id. The notice of investigation 

names the following respondents: 

General Electric Company of Boston, 

Massachusetts; Consumer Lighting 

(U.S.) LLC, d/b/a GE Lighting of 

Cleveland, Ohio; Savant Systems, Inc. of 

Hyannis, Massachusetts; Home Depot 

Product Authority, LLC; Home Depot 

U.S.A., Inc.; and The Home Depot, Inc. 

of Atlanta, Georgia; Feit Electric 

Company, Inc. of Pico Rivera, 

California; Satco Products, Inc. of 

Brentwood, New York; IKEA Supply AG 

of Pratteln, Switzerland; IKEA U.S. 

Retail LLC of Conshohocken, 

Pennsylvania; and IKEA of Sweden AB 

of Almhult, Sweden. See id. The Office 

of Unfair Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) 

is also a party to the investigation. See 

id. 

On October 26, 2020, Signify filed a 

motion to intervene in this investigation 

pursuant to Commission Rule 210.19 

(19 CFR 210.19). Signify argued that its 

motion is timely and that 

‘‘[i]ntervention is necessary so that 

Signify may properly defend its LED 

products that are alleged to be imported 

and/or sold after importation by the 

Home Depot Respondents.’’ See Mot. at 

1. No party opposed the motion to

intervene except that Complainant

argued that Signify should not be

allowed to intervene as to the issue of

domestic industry because Signify’s

interests on that issue are adequately

represented by the existing parties. See

Complainant’s Resp. at 3 (Nov. 2, 2020).

On November 2, 2020, OUII filed a

response in support of the motion to

intervene.

On November 5, 2020, the ALJ issued 

the subject ID (Order No. 14) granting 

Signify’s motion to intervene. The ID 

notes that ‘‘[n]o party disputes that 

Signify should be allowed to intervene.’’ 

See ID at 2. The ID finds that ‘‘Signify 

may fully participate as a party in the 

investigation, including with respect to 

all claims and defenses at issue in the 

investigation.’’ See id. No petition for 

review of the subject ID was filed. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the subject ID. Signify is an 

intervenor in this investigation. 

The Commission’s vote for this 

determination took place on November 

30, 2020. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210).