alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification

In connection with the Annual Report of NGP Capital
Resources Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John H. Homier, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                       |  | 
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: March 12, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    JOHN H. HOMIER                
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | John H. Homier                       
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NGP
Capital Resources Company and will be retained by NGP Capital Resources Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
This is to certify that 

Shotover Camera Systems Limited Partnership 

Is authorised under the provisions of CAA Rule Part 102 to conduct 

operations using Unmanned Aircraft subject to the privileges and 

conditions specified in the attached Operations Specifications and the 

organisation's exposition. 

This certificate is not transferable, and shall come into force on the 

21st day of March 2016 and remain in force until the 20th day of 

March 2018 unless otherwise suspended or revoked. 

Granted this 21st day of March 2016 

for Director ofCi il Aviation 

This certificate is granted pursuant to Civil Aviation Rule Part 102 

No. UAOC88120 
2. Address For Service 

Shotover Camera Systems Limited Pattnership 

133 Glenda Drive 

FRANKTON 

Queenstown 9300 

3. Other Business Trading Names 

Nil 

4. Privileges of the Certificate 

This organisation is permitted to conduct operations: 

With aircraft over 25I{g 

Operations Permitted 

Photography 

Lat'ge model aircraft greater than 251{g 

Pt·omotional Activities 

Limitations of Geographical Areas of Operation 

Flight Park Queenstown, 

793 Malaghans Rd, 

Queenstown. 

856 Ardgour Rd 

Tarras 9383. 

Crown Terrace, 

Queenstown. 

5. Persons with Responsibilities 

Title per CAA Rule 

Prime Responsibility 

Persons Having Control 

Person Having Control 

Name 

Mr B S Hurndell 

MrMK Hancox 

Company Title 

Shotover Camera Sustems 

Shotover Camera Systems 

CAANo 

80152 

51073 

. hL~ / ~ UAOC88 120 Shotover Camera Systems Limited Partnership ····1./.P.. ~ ............. Dated 2 1 March 2016 Page 

1 

of

2 

Accepted By: 
Rule Pmi 12 

Rule Pati 101 

2. The aircraft must have an indelible label that can be viewed without removal of any covers, clearly identifying who the operator 

is. 

3. Operations within a 4km radius of an aerodrome or helipoti must be conducted in accordance with Shotover Camera Systems 

Exposition Chapter 8.6 

4. Operations up to 30kgs in accordance with Shotover Camera Systems Exposition. 

5. Operations must comply with CAR 101.207 (a)(1)(i)(ii) 

Accepted By: ~ /J ./1/ UAOC88120 ····fl#.~LC ............... Dated 21 March 20!6 Shotovcr Camera Systems Limited Partnership 

Page 2 of2
§ 1218.706 What debts may ONRR refer to Treasury to collect by administrative offset or tax refund offset? ( a ) The ONRR may refer any past due, legally enforceable debt you owe to ONRR to Treasury to collect through administrative offset or tax refund offset at least 60 days after we give you notice under 30 CFR 1218.703 if the debt: ( 1 ) Is at least $25.00 or another amount established by Treasury; and
( 2 ) Does not involve Federal oil and gas lease obligations for which offset is precluded under 30 U.S.C. 1724(b)(3).
( b ) The ONRR may refer debts reduced to judgment to Treasury for tax refund offset at any time.
Exhibit
23.1




The Board
of Directors


James
River Coal Company





Marshall
Miller & Associates, Inc. hereby consents to the use in the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, and the incorporation
by reference into the Company’s Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No.
333-143563) and Form S-8 (No. 333-126860 and No. 333-161123) of the information
contained in our reports, for James River Coal Company, dated July 22, 2004, and
for Triad Mining, Inc. and subsidiary, dated April 29, 2005 and April ll, 2006,
setting forth the estimates of the Company’s (as of March 31, 2004) and Triad’s
(as of February 1, 2005 and April 11, 2006) coal reserves, and to the references
to our firm under the heading “Experts” in the registration
statements.





Marshall
      Miller & Associates, Inc.By: /s/ John E.
      FeddockName:
      John E. Feddock, P.E.Title: Senior
      Vice President





February
26, 2010
-121*06’ 00” ~121° 00’ 00”
: 36" 30°00” |

| ea |

“00” ao" - “Q0” -121* 18’ 00” -121% 12’ 00”
~121°54’' 00” -121° 48’ 00” -12 1 42’ 00” -121* 36’ 0 -121% 30°00 121%24’ 00 1718’ 00

-122°
36% 30’ 00”

t
|

2 Y
&]
2
z

{NNT SIAL NO Live vo, 2909 NOHISOa

O91 -W7

Wa ame a%teg |

Wry Y
om |
i | 36°24’ 00"

36824’ 00"/4 ! Pr]
}
Te |
y, :

\

JUWHOCHOU CIOH NVId

367 18’ 00”

VINGOsi (VU SNIAKE «

36% 18/00”

&

@)

VX ALN

fe Av yy
: ay
eo é
ees i] |
Ba 2 i
x el a Fi |
>
Nu
SRN By ° Al oo -®
ve WS 5 C W |
< § ' |
BY \S
4 % x| wo |
~ s| ay
sal (2 See 8

2

pen > A

- 36% 12° 00”

- SS) as WW
(~
if
275 70
5

VES
+2258,

36% 12’ 00” = \ a
| :
fa 3 SS < mw a
er ae SS |
qd 4 ‘ =
im i
=e |

—l. : | 4

<4 f) |
Z | |
Ax i f

~S= | | ;

AE 5 HRS REX | ;

N a4 = + AY, bes ‘N ' 5 |
S a) & : ( | 2 |
Se & Fo ven K
ES | -

Z . g eA
AA . @,* j

367 06’ 00”

.
cy
oy
2G
q
S
cS)

VON

36" 06’ 00" — = LV al ss
29° : = a \
Z N a ! ig
i C ~ ES ® 2 Js |
WS hi , apc ap
j ao
i O} ~
/., AY oo ° wo wy
ie RX] | ° ars 8 ~ > iS
a ie ed ye (OO.ag | OH Re . |
a BS as es S BO | & I E\ WL : : : kk Lk a : a
ee, / is it Fs d ( ne Ee a \ 5 | Ss 36°0 0’ 00 ”
oan! ; \\ Y@ lt - 3 Pees
3@ 00 00 Mem tee oe OA NEY 2 i a a4 = 8, Tht Ss ~ ; : bay _ bane _ ater ane ~{21*12/ 00” -121*06’ 00” -121° 00°00
-122°00'0 ee > 1214 oo” > -121748’ 00” 7 “=7217 42! 00” --. ~121°36'00" -121730'00 121724’ 00 121° 18°00 :
| | | POINT SUR N3sO12IW
SCALE 1:100,000

NOS MULTIBEAM SURVEYS
Contours in corrected meters

O | O LM 160 | (
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeals of -- ) 

) 

CACI International, Inc. ) 

) 

Under Contract No. N00140-06-C-0040 et al. ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA Nos. 59799, 59800 

J. William Koegel, Jr., Esq. 

Executive Vice President, General 

Counsel & Corporate Secretary 

E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Joseph D. Keller, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Arlington Heights, IL 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 23 February 2016 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 59799, 59800, Appeals of CACI 

International, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
§ 1227.800 How will ONRR monitor a State's performance of delegated functions? This section explains ONRR's procedures for monitoring your performance of any of your delegated functions. ( a ) A monitoring team of ONRR officials will annually review your performance of the delegated functions and compliance with your delegation agreement, the *Standards,* and 30 U.S.C. 1735, including conducting fiscal examination to verify your costs for reimbursement.
( b ) The monitoring team also will: ( 1 ) Periodically review your statistical reports required under § 1227.200(e) to verify your accuracy, timeliness, and efficiency;
( 2 ) Check for timely transmittal of production report or royalty report information to ONRR and other affected agencies, as applicable, to allow for proper disbursement of funds and processing of information;
( 3 ) Coordinate on-site visits and Office of the Inspector General, General Accounting Office, and ONRR audits of your performance of your delegated functions; and
( 4 ) Maintain reports of its monitoring activities.
[62 FR 43084, Aug. 12, 1997, as amended at 75 FR 61087, Oct. 4, 2010]
```

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         In connection with the annual report of Ames True Temper, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 25, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Richard Dell, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

               (i)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                    13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
                    Act of 1934; and

               (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and results
                    of operations of the Company.

Date: December 23, 2004

                  /s/ Richard Dell
                  -------------------------------
                  Richard Dell
                  Chief Executive Officer
                  (Principal Executive Officer)
```
#### Pamy H. Francis, Respondent, v Amadeo I. D. Francis, Appellant.

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered December 2, 1977, which directed appellant to pay respondent the sum of $200 a week for the support of the parties’ two children, together with counsel fees of $1,500, unanimously modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, to provide for support of the children in the sum of $600 a month retroactive to December 2, 1977 and to reduce counsel fees to $1,000, and otherwise affirmed. After reviewing the relative financial positions of appellant and respondent, we agree with appellant that the provisions for support and counsel fees contained in the order of December 2, 1977 are beyond the financial ability of the appellant, and accordingly, are excessive. There is evidence to show that respondent, an attorney admitted to practice in Puerto Rico, is able to contribute some financial support to the children. Such support should be shared by both parents *(Matter of Carter v Carter,*58 AD2d 438). Although tuition at private school is not a cost which our courts can provide *(Matter of Berland v Berland,*47 AD2d 540; *Winston v Winston,*50 AD2d 527), Special Term in awarding support recognized that the Puerto Rican divorce decree provided for the children’s schooling at private school. Our award of $600 per month is predicated on the assumption that appellant does not plan to pay tuition for private school for the two children. In the event that he pays such tuition hereafter, for either or both of the children, he is not precluded from applying for an appropriate modification of this order, if warranted. Appellant’s failure to comply with the provisions of the Puerto Rican decree justified this action by respondent. In view of respondent’s lack of assets, an award of counsel fees is proper (Domestic Relations Law, § 237). Nevertheless, the financial position of appellant does not justify the award of counsel fees of $1,500. Such award is reduced to $1,000. Concur—Lupiano, J. P., Birns, Evans and Sandler, JJ.
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive
        - Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission

#  Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission 

**Collected by:** Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive 

**Archived since:**Feb, 2015

**Description:**
The Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission is an independent federal agency, providing administrative trial and appellate review, created to decide contests of citations or penalties resulting from OSHA inspections of American work places.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal

**Creator:**    	    U.S. Department of Labor

**Language:**    	    English

**Collector:**    	    U.S. Government Publishing Office

## Narrow Your Results

### 

            There are no further ways to narrow your results.           

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear

              - Sites
              - Search Page Text

Page 1 of 1  (2 Total Results)

**Sort By:**
                - Title (A-Z)
                - Title (Z-A)
                - URL (A-Z)
                - URL (Z-A)

### URL:     https://twitter.com/OSHRC_Chairman/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.oshrc.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

Page 1 of 1  (2 Total Results)

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
§ 91.300 General. ( a ) A complete consolidated plan consists of the information required in § 91.300 through § 91.330, submitted in accordance with instructions prescribed by HUD (including tables and narratives), or in such other format as jointly agreed upon by HUD and the state. A comprehensive housing affordability strategy consists of the information required in §§ 91.300 through 91.315(e), 91.315(h) through 91.315(m), 91.320(c), 91.320 (g), 91.225 and 91.330.
( b ) The State shall describe: ( 1 ) The lead agency or entity responsible for overseeing the development of the plan and the significant aspects of the process by which the consolidated plan was developed;
( 2 ) The identity of the agencies, groups, organizations, and others who participated in the process;
( 3 ) The State's consultations with: ( i ) Continuums of Care;
( ii ) Public and private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, or education needs of low-income individuals and families, homeless individuals and families, youth, and/or other persons with special needs;
( iii ) Publicly funded institutions and systems of care that may discharge persons into homelessness (such as health-care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions);
( iv ) Commencing with consolidated plans submitted on or after January 1, 2018, public and private organizations, including broadband internet service providers and organizations engaged in narrowing the digital divide;
( v ) Commencing with consolidated plans submitted on or after January 1, 2018, agencies whose primary responsibilities include the management of flood prone areas, public land or water resources, and emergency management agencies; and
( vi ) Other entities.
( c ) The plan shall contain a concise executive summary that includes the objectives and outcomes identified in the plan as well as an evaluation of past performance. The plan shall also contain a concise summary of the citizen participation process, public comments, and efforts made to broaden public participation in the development of the consolidated plan.
[71 FR 6967, Feb. 9, 2006, as amended at 76 FR 75970, Dec. 5, 2011; 81 FR 91012, Dec. 16, 2016]
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive
        - National Council on Disability

#  National Council on Disability 

**Collected by:** Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive 

**Archived since:**Apr, 2013

**Description:**
NCD is an independent federal agency charged with advising the President, Congress, and other federal agencies regarding policies, programs, practices, and procedures that affect people with disabilities. NCD is comprised of a team of Presidential and Congressional appointees, an Executive Director appointed by the Chairman, and eleven, full-time professional staff.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal,     	    Consumer Protection & Public Safety,     	    Persons with Disabilities

**Creator:**    	    National Council on Disability

**Language:**    	    English

**Collector:**    	    U.S. Government Publishing Office

## Narrow Your Results

### 

            There are no further ways to narrow your results.           

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear

              - Sites
              - Search Page Text

Page 1 of 1  (4 Total Results)

**Sort By:**
                - Title (A-Z)
                - Title (Z-A)
                - URL (A-Z)
                - URL (Z-A)

### URL:     https://twitter.com/NatCounDis/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.facebook.com/NCDgov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.ncd.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.youtube.com/user/NCDgov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

Page 1 of 1  (4 Total Results)

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2952 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to the eligibility 

of veterans for mortgage bond financing, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 16, 2005 

Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin (for himself and Mr. HERGER) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect 

to the eligibility of veterans for mortgage bond financing, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Veterans 

5 Homeownership Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•HR 2952 IH 

1 SEC. 2. ALL VETERANS ELIGIBLE FOR STATE HOME LOAN 

2 PROGRAMS FUNDED BY QUALIFIED VET3 ERANS’ MORTGAGE BONDS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 143(l)(4) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 (defining qualified veteran) is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘at some time before January 1, 

8 1977’’ in subparagraph (A), and 

9 (2) by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting 

10 the following: 

11 ‘‘(B) who applied for the financing before 

12 the date 25 years after the last on which such 

13 veteran left active service.’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to financing provided and mort16 gage credit certificates issued after June 30, 2005. 

17 SEC. 3. REVISION OF STATE VETERANS LIMIT. 

18 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (B) of section 

19 143(l)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating 

20 to volume limitation) is amended to read as follows: 

21 ‘‘(B) STATE VETERANS LIMIT.—A State 

22 veterans limit for any calendar year is the 

23 amount equal to— 

24 ‘‘(i) $215,000,000 for the State of 

25 Texas, 
3 

•HR 2952 IH 

1 ‘‘(ii) $265,000,000 for the State of 

2 California, 

3 ‘‘(iii) $100,000,000 for the State of 

4 Oregon, 

5 ‘‘(iv) $100,000,000 for the State of 

6 Wisconsin, and 

7 ‘‘(v) $100,000,000 for the State of 

8 Alaska.’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 this section shall apply to bonds issued after December 

11 31, 2005. 

Æ
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 31.1

<PAGE>

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, James H. Jenkins, certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
        8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
        periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Popular
        ABS, Inc.;

2.      Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
        whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
        to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
        of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
        misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
        report;

3.      Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
        required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling
        and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is
        included in these reports;

4.      Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included
        in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance
        with the terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and
        except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
        obligations under the servicing agreement; and

5.      The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
        servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
        the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
        conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
        Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
        pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these
        reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.,
as trustee.

Date: March 10, 2005

                                                /s/ James H. Jenkins
                                                --------------------------------
                                                James H. Jenkins,
                                                Executive Vice President and CFO
                                                Popular ABS, Inc.