alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2887

To suspend temporarily the duty on Alpha Oxy Naphthoic Acid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 14, 2005

Mr. CHABOT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Alpha Oxy Naphthoic 

Acid.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ALPHA OXY NAPHTHOIC ACID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.11.11 2 Naphthylenecarboxylic 

Acid, 1 Hydroxy (CAS No. 

86–48–6) (provided for in 

subheading 2918.29.04) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2

•HR 2887 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
§ 1219.514 How will ONRR allocate the qualified OCS revenues (Phase II) to coastal political subdivisions within the Gulf producing States? ( a ) Of the qualified OCS revenues (Phase II) allocated to a Gulf producing State's CPSs, ONRR will allocate 25 percent based on the proportion that each CPS's population bears to the population of all CPSs in the State.
( b ) Of the qualified OCS revenues (Phase II) allocated to a Gulf producing State's CPSs, we will allocate 25 percent based on the proportion that each CPS's miles of coastline bears to the total miles of coastline across all CPSs in the State. However, for the State of Louisiana, we will deem CPSs without a coastline to each have a coastline one-third the average length of the coastline of all CPSs within Louisiana that have a coastline.
( c ) ( 1 ) Of the qualified OCS revenues (Phase II) allocated to a Gulf producing State's CPSs, we will allocate 50 percent in amounts that are inversely proportional to the respective distances between: ( i ) The point in each CPS that is closest to the geographic center of the applicable leased tract (Phase II) or historical lease site; and
( ii ) The geographic center of each applicable leased tract (Phase II) or historical lease site.
( 2 ) However, we will exclude distances to an applicable leased tract (Phase II) from this calculation if any portion of the tract is located in a geographic area that was subject to a leasing moratorium on January 1, 2005, unless the leased tract was in production on that date.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

      ( print page 78314)    

# TIME AND DATE: 

9:30 a.m. EST, Tuesday, December 8, 2020.

# PLACE: 

Virtual meeting.

# STATUS: 

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission” or “CFTC”) will hold this meeting to consider the following matters:
      - Final Rule: Electronic Trading Risk Principles;
      - Final Rule: Swap Execution Facilities (Audit Trail, Financial Resources, and CCO Requirements);
      - Final Rule: Exemptions from Swap Trade Execution Requirement;
      - Withdrawal of Unadopted Proposals in the 2018 SEF Proposed Rule: Swap Execution Facilities and Trade Execution Requirement;
      - Final Rule: Part 190 Bankruptcy Regulations;
      - Final Rule: Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants (Minimum Transfer Amount);
      - Final Rule: Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants (Material Swap Exposure Definition and Initial Margin Calculation); and
      - Final Rule: Revision of Certain Regulatory Provisions to Incorporate Changes in the Commission's Administrative Structure.

                        The agenda for this meeting will be available to the public and posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.cftc.gov.*                         Instructions for public access to the live feed of the meeting will also be posted on the Commission's website. In the event that the time, date, or place of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, or place of the meeting, will be posted on the Commission's website.                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Christopher Kirkpatrick, Secretary of the Commission, 202-418-5964.

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

Dated: December 1, 2020.

Christopher Kirkpatrick,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2020-26791 Filed 12-2-20; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report") of Pinnacle Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certifies that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

/s/ Robert B. Nolen, Jr.
---------------------------------------------------
Robert B. Nolen, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer

November 14, 2005
----------------------------------------------------------
(Date)

      A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The
information furnished herein shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed
incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
### §34. Scientific employees

The scientific employees of the United States Geological Survey shall be selected by the Director, subject to the approval of the Secretary of the Interior exclusively for their qualifications as professional experts.

(July 7, 1884, ch. 332, 23 Stat. 212; Pub. L. 102–154, title I, Nov. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1000.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"United States Geological Survey" substituted in text for "Geological Survey" pursuant to provision of title I of Pub. L. 102–154, set out as a note under section 31 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out under section 1451 of this title.
### §§1238a, 1239. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 1238a and 1239 were omitted in view of recognition of Philippine independence.

Section 1238a, act Aug. 7, 1939, ch. 502, §8, 53 Stat. 1234, related to assignment of Foreign Service Officers to Philippines.

Section 1239, acts Jan. 17, 1933, ch. 11, §9, 47 Stat. 768; Mar. 24, 1934, ch. 84, §9, 48 Stat. 463, related to obligation of United States as to Philippine bonds and exemption of bonds from taxation.
### §1240. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, acts Mar. 24, 1934, ch. 84, §10, 48 Stat. 463; Aug. 7, 1939, ch. 502, §3, 53 Stat. 1230, related to recognition of Philippine independence, withdrawal of American sovereignty, and property for diplomatic purposes, and was transferred to section 1394 of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse.
TABLE OF CONTENTS     ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS  3      ARTICLE 2. OPERATIONAL SUPPORT  3      ARTICLE 3. OBLIGATIONS OF PARTY B  4      ARTICLE 4. CONSIDERATION FOR PROVIDING OPERATIONAL SUPPORT  4      ARTICLE 5. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES  4      ARTICLE 6. CONFIDENTIALITY  4      ARTICLE 7. GOVERNING LAW AND OBLIGATIONS UPON DEFAULT  5      ARTICLE 8. DISPUTE RESOLUTION  5      ARTICLE 9. EFFECTIVENESS  5      ARTICLE 10. NO SUBSEQUENT OBLIGATION  5      ARTICLE 11. AMENDMENT  6      ARTICLE 12. COUNTERPARTS  6      ARTICLE 13. MISCELLANEOUS  6      EXHIBIT 1 CONSIDERATION FOR OPERATION GUARANTEE  7 
 
2

 
OPERATION AGREEMENTThis Operation Agreement (“this Agreement”) is entered into in Beijing, People’s Republic of China(the “PRC”) on August 3rd, 2009 between:Party A: Fortune (Beijing) Success Technology Co., Ltd.
#### § 18.90 Purpose.

The regulations of this subpart E set forth the procedures and requirements for permissibility which must be met to obtain MSHA field approval of electrically operated machinery used or intended for use in by the last open crosscut of a coal mine which has not been otherwise approved, certified or accepted under the provisions of this part 18, chapter I, title 30, Code of Federal Regulations (Bureau of Mines Schedule 2G).
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Terry Lewis, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, dated May 17, 1976 convicting defendant after jury trial of attempted robbery in the first degree (Penal Law, §§ 110, 160.15), and sentencing him thereon as a second felony offender, is unanimously affirmed. There were obvious difficulties and frustrations due in part to the Russian interpreter used on the first day of the trial, and thereafter replaced by a different Russian interpreter. However, the Trial Justice who was of course there and saw these difficulties and frustrations did not think that they had so impaired defendant’s right to a fair trial that it could not be corrected by having a new interpreter. We have read the transcript, and in our opinion it does not warrant our overruling the Trial Justice. The complaining witness’ story, both on direct and cross-examination, seems to have come out quite comprehensibly during the first interpreter’s service. It was gone into again during the second interpreter’s service and there appears to be no substantial difference between the testimony as elicited through the first interpreter and the testimony as elicited through the second interpreter. It further appears that at least some of the difficulties were due to having an excitable complaining witness unfamiliar with the American custom of rather wide-ranging cross-examination; e.g., the remark "silly questions” appears to be the witness’ statement and not the interpreter’s, as it appears during the second interpreter’s translation as well as the first. The brief reference in the prosecutor’s summation to the difficulties with the first interpreter was merely a concrete illustration of the obvious fact that a police officer unfamiliar with the Russian language might misunderstand what an excited complainant unfamiliar with the English language was saying to him. Concur—Lupiano, J. P., Birns, Silverman, Evans and Markewich, JJ.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3233 

To extend the suspension of duty on trifluralin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 12, 2005 

Mr. BUYER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on trifluralin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRIFLURALIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.05.33 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 α,α,α-Trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-p-toluidine) is amended by 

7 striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TCI
SATELLITE ENTERTAINMENT INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         223,603
<SECURITIES>                                   355,833
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                             350
<DEPRECIATION>                                      63
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,014,836
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         21,644
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          194,543
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        71,633
<OTHER-SE>                                      96,921
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,014,836
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   220
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,889
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (46,411)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,402
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (31,009)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (31,009)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.58)


</TABLE>
### §3. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 640

Section, acts June 25, 1906, ch. 3528, 34 Stat. 456; June 4, 1920, ch. 227, subch. I, §14, 41 Stat. 769, provided for appointment of Chief of Bureau.
#### Town of Aurora, Respondent, v. H. Ben Whaley, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. (Appeal from order of Brie Special Term granting plaintiff’s motion to strike out certain paragraphs of defendant’s answer.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, MeClusky and Henry, JJ.
#### Clifford Miner, Respondent, v. George Sherman, Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed and verdict reinstated, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: The evidence was sufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict. (Appeal from order of Ontario Trial Term setting aside the verdict of no cause of action and granting a new trial, in a negligence action.) Present — 1 Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman and Noonan, JJ.
### §1392b. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–357, title III, §308(c), Oct. 19, 1982, 96 Stat. 1710

Section, act July 1, 1932, ch. 370, §2, 47 Stat. 565, vested in District Court of Virgin Islands jurisdiction of prosecutions for violations of section 1399 of this title, relating to obstruction of navigable waters.
§ 1202.353 Measurement standards for reporting and paying royalties and direct use fees. ( a ) For geothermal resources used to generate electricity, you must report the quantity on which royalty is due on Form ONRR-2014 (Report of Sales and Royalty Remittance) as follows: ( 1 ) For geothermal resources for which royalty is calculated under § 1206.352(a), you must report quantities in: ( i ) Thousands of pounds to the nearest whole thousand pounds if the contract for the geothermal resources specifies delivery in terms of weight; or
( ii ) Millions of Btu to the nearest whole million Btu if the sales contract for the geothermal resources specifies delivery in terms of heat or thermal energy.
( 2 ) For geothermal resources for which royalty is calculated under § 1206.352(b), you must report the quantities in kilowatt-hours to the nearest whole kilowatt-hour.
( b ) For geothermal resources used in direct use processes, you must report the quantity on which a royalty or direct use fee is due on Form ONRR-2014 in: ( 1 ) Millions of Btu to the nearest whole million Btu if valuation is in terms of heat or thermal energy used or displaced;
( 2 ) Millions of gallons to the nearest million gallons of geothermal fluid produced if valuation or fee calculation is in terms of volume;
( 3 ) Millions of pounds to the nearest million pounds of geothermal fluid produced if valuation or fee calculation is in terms of mass; or
( 4 ) Any other measurement unit ONRR approves for valuation and reporting purposes.
( c ) For byproducts, you must report the quantity on which royalty is due on Form ONRR-2014 consistent with ONRR-established reporting standards.
( d ) For commercially demineralized water, you must report the quantity on which royalty is due on Form ONRR-2014 in hundreds of gallons to the nearest hundred gallons.
( e ) You need not report the quality of geothermal resources, including byproducts, to ONRR. However, you must maintain quality measurements for audit purposes. Quality measurements include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Temperatures and chemical analyses for fluid geothermal resources; and
( 2 ) Chemical analyses, weight percent, or other purity measurements for byproducts.
[72 FR 24458, May 2, 2007, as amended at 78 FR 30200, May 22, 2013]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Lind, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on January 19, 1976, convicting defendant of the crime of robbery, second degree, is unanimously affirmed. It appears that the defendant went to a physician’s office, filled out a new patient form and presented it to the nurse. Later, he robbed the physician, personnel and patients. When the police arrived in response to a silent alarm, defendant fled and was apprehended several days later as the result of another crime. Defendant now claims to have been deprived of the right to an expert witness in violation of section 722 of article 18-B of the County Law wherein the People’s handwriting analyst confirmed that defendant had filled out the new patient form after comparing it with a letter sent by the defendant to the Trial Judge. The defendant’s request for his own handwriting expert was denied. The denial was inappropriate in view of the County Law which states that those charged with a crime should be provided with expert and other services necessary for an adequate defense. Nonetheless, here it was harmless error. The overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt was provided by the eyewitnesses, and an additional handwriting analysis would not have been sufficient to rebut their testimony. Concur—Silverman, J. P., Evans, Lynch, Sandler and Sullivan, JJ.
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 22
- 00353
- CV IN THE INTEREST OF R.W.S., J.R.S., AND M.S., CHILDREN

From the 13th District Court Navarro County, Texas Trial Court No. D21
- 29633
- CV

ABATEMENT ORDER
This is an appeal of an order that terminated B.S.'s parental rights

. B.S.'s court

appointed trial counsel filed a notice of appeal on B.S.'s beh alf but was subsequently allowed to withdraw. In the order granting the motion to withdraw, no attorney was appointed to represent B.S. in this appeal. The clerk's record had been filed before the attorney was allowed to withdraw. Neither t he trial cour t n or the trial court clerk
forwarded the withdrawal order to this Court.
The noti ce of appeal, filed on October 27, 2022 , alleges that B.S. is presumed to be indigent and may proceed without advance payment of costs. As an indigent party in
this terminat ion proceeding, B.S. is entitled to the appointment of counsel on appeal.In the Interest of R.W.S., J.R.S., and M.S., Children Page 2 Therefore, we abate this proceeding and remand it to the trial court for the appointment of counsel to represent B.S. The trial court is ordered to appoint counsel to represent B.S. on appeal within seven days of the date of this order. A supplemental clerk's record is ordered to be filed with this Court with the name and contact information of B.S.'s appointed counsel w ithin seven days after the trial court's appointment of counsel. This proceeding will be automatically reinstated without further Order of this Court upon the filing of the supplemental clerk's record containing the name and contact
information of B.S.'s appointed counsel. All briefing deadlines will commence on the date the supplemental clerk's record appointing new counsel is filed with this Court

. Because the trial court ordered the entire record sealed on its own motion for

reasons which are not expl ained or supported by the record , the trial court is further
ordered to ensure that counsel for B.S. and all other parties have full access to the clerk's and reporter's records in this proceeding immediately upon counsel's appointment and
for the duration of the appeal

. PER CURIAM Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith Aba ted and remanded to trial court Order issued and filed December 21, 2022 [RWR]
#### § 943.126 What is the relationship between HUD and a consortium?

HUD has a direct relationship with the consortium through the PHA Plan process and through one or more payment agreements, executed in a form prescribed by HUD, under which HUD and the participating PHAs agree that program funds will be paid to the lead agency on behalf of the participating PHAs. Such funds must be used in accordance with the consortium agreement, the joint PHA Plan and HUD regulations and requirements.