U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              WASHINGTON D.C. 20549

                                   FORM 10-QSB
(Mark One)
[X]      QUARTERLY  REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES  EXCHANGE
         ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2002.

                                       OR

[_]      TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

                        Commission file number 000-21477

                                  ASPEON, INC.
                                ----------------
        (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

         Delaware                                             52-1945748
----------------------------------                     -------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of                        (IRS Employer Identifica-
   incorporation or organization)                      tion No.)

           2460 WEST 26th AVENUE, SUITE 380-C, DENVER, COLORADO, 80211
          -------------------------------------------------------------
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (303) 380 9784
                         -----------------------------
                           (Issuer's telephone number)

Check whether the issuer:  (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ ] No [ X ]

Indicate by check mark whether the  Registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [X] No [ ]

State the  number of  shares  outstanding  of each of the  issuer's  classes  of
equity, as of the latest practicable date:

              Class                              Outstanding September 22, 2006
--------------------------------                --------------------------------
Common Stock, $ 0.01 par value                     20,000,000 shares

         Transitional Small Business Disclosure format: Yes [ ] No [ X ]

<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                      INDEX

                                  ASPEON, INC.


PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
<S>                                                                               <C>

Item 1.  Financial Statements (Unaudited)                                         PAGE

Consolidated Balance Sheet - March 31, 2002.                                        3

Consolidated Statements of Operations - Three and Nine Months ended                 4
March 31, 2002 and 2001.

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows - Nine Months ended March 31,                  5
2002 and 2001.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.                                         6


Item 2.           Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
                  Condition and Results of Operations                              44

Item 3.           Controls and Procedures                                          70




PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.           Legal Proceedings                                                70
Item 2.           Changes in Securities                                            72
Item 3.           Defaults on Senior Securities                                    72
Item 4.           Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders              72
Item 5.           Other Information                                                72
Item 6.           Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.                                72

Unaudited and Audited Extracts From 2002 - 2005 Consolidated Financial Statements  78
</TABLE>


<PAGE>

Part I.   FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item I. Financial Statements

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                     Aspeon, Inc.
                              Consolidated Balance Sheet
                                     (Unaudited)


                                                                              March 31,
                                                                                 2002
                                                                           ---------------
<S>                                                                        <C>
ASSETS

Current Assets
      Cash & Cash Equivalents                                              $      177,700
      Accounts Receivable - net of allowance for doubtful debts                 1,153,800
      Inventories                                                               1,457,600
      Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets                                 1,803,100
                                                                             -------------
                Total Current Assets                                            4,592,200

Property and Equipment, net                                                     2,027,900
Goodwill                                                                        6,071,800
Other Assets, net                                                                 302,100
                                                                           ---------------
TOTAL ASSETS                                                               $   12,994,000
                                                                           ===============

LIABILITIES, MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE SECURITIES & STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

Current Liabilities
      Line of Credit                                                       $            0
      Accounts Payable                                                          4,674,300
      Accrued Expenses                                                          2,405,100
      Current Maturities of Long-Term Debt                                        416,400
      Customer Deposits                                                           219,800
      Deferred Revenues                                                           735,200
      Manditorily Redeemable Preferred Stock (in default)                      16,074,700
      Purchase Price Payable for Acquisitions                                   2,123,900
                                                                             -------------
                Total Current Liabilities                                      26,649,400

Long-Term Debt, net of current portion                                          1,660,200
Other                                                                               9,900
                                                                             -------------
Total Liabilities                                                              28,319,500

Manditorily Redeemable Series A  Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value,
9,850 issued and outstanding as at Marcg 31, 2002 (liquidation                    -
value of $16,074,700)(in default) (classified as a current liability)

Manditorily Redeemable Warrants                                                 3,426,600

STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
      Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value: 990,000 shares authorized (1,000,000            0
      authorized, net 10,000 designated as mandatorily redeemable stock), no
      shares issued and outstanding.
      Common Stock, $0.01 par value: 20,000,000 shares authorized,  9,436,225      94,400
      shares issued and outstanding.
      Additional Paid In Capital                                               65,143,600
      Treasury Stock                                                              (60,000)
      Accumulated Deficit                                                     (83,930,100)
                                                                           ---------------
                Total Stockholders' Deficit                                   (18,752,100)

TOTAL LIABILITIES, MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE SECURITIES AND
                                                                           ---------------
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT                                                      $   12,994,000
                                                                           ===============
</TABLE>


          See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

                                        3

<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                          Aspeon, Inc.
                             Consolidated Statements of Operations
                                          (Unaudited)

                                                                Three Months Ended                    Nine Months Ended
                                                                     March 31,                             March 31,
                                                                2002             2001                2002              2001
                                                          ---------------  ----------------    ----------------  ---------------
<S>                                                       <C>              <C>                 <C>               <C>
Revenue
      Products                                            $    4,468,100   $    10,137,400     $    18,616,800   $   34,042,900
      Services                                                 2,210,500         4,562,800           9,230,400       16,430,300
                                                          ---------------  ----------------    ----------------  ---------------
      Total Revenue                                            6,678,600        14,700,200          27,847,200       50,473,200

Cost of Sales
      Products                                                 3,380,400         9,751,500          15,881,300       30,751,200
      Services                                                 2,250,500         3,249,900           8,357,400       14,191,500
                                                          ---------------  ----------------    ----------------  ---------------
      Total Cost of Sales                                      5,630,900        13,001,400          24,238,700       44,942,700
                                                          ---------------  ----------------    ----------------  ---------------
Gross Profit                                                   1,047,700         1,698,800           3,608,500        5,530,500

Operating Expenses
      Research and Development                                   168,800           325,900             624,000          971,400
      General and Administrative Expenses                      2,069,900         5,270,800           6,968,900       19,056,100
      Selling and Marketing Expenses                             374,000         1,515,900           2,251,200        5,331,100
      Gain on Debt Restructuring                                (520,100)                0            (520,100)               0
      Loss on Disposal of Fixed Assets                         7,276,100                 0           7,276,100                0
      Impairment Charge                                                0         2,664,900                   0       20,030,900
                                                          ---------------  ----------------    ----------------  ---------------
      Total Operating Expenses                                 9,368,700         9,777,500          16,600,100       45,389,500

      Operating (Loss)                                        (8,321,000)       (8,078,700)        (12,991,600)     (39,859,000)

Interest and Other Income / (Expenses) Net                    (1,058,200)          459,600          (1,706,700)        (179,400)
                                                          ---------------  ----------------    ----------------  ---------------
(Loss) before Income Taxes and Cumulative Effect of           (9,379,200)       (7,619,100)        (14,698,300)     (40,038,400)
Accounting Change

Provision for Income Taxes                                             0          (162,800)             (5,400)        (207,000)
                                                          ---------------  ----------------    ----------------  ---------------
(Loss) before Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change          (9,379,200)       (7,781,900)        (14,703,700)     (40,245,400)

Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change (net of income
        tax of $0)                                                     0                 0                   0          817,600
                                                          ---------------  ----------------    ----------------  ---------------
Net (Loss)                                                    (9,379,200)       (7,781,900)        (14,703,700)     (39,427,800)

Accretion of Manditorily Redeemable Series A Preferred          (147,700)         (147,800)           (443,200)      (7,044,300)
Stock Dividends
                                                          ---------------  ----------------    ----------------  ---------------
Net Loss Available to Common Stockholders                 $   (9,526,900)  $    (7,929,700)    $   (15,146,900)  $  (46,472,100)
                                                          ===============  ================    ================  ===============

BASIC AND DILUTED NET (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

      Before Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change       $       ($0.99)  $        ($0.82)    $        ($1.56)  $       ($4.27)
      Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change                       $0.00             $0.00               $0.00            $0.09
                                                          ---------------  ----------------    ----------------  ---------------
      Net (Loss) Per Common Share                         $       ($0.99)  $        ($0.82)    $        ($1.56)  $       ($4.19)
                                                          ===============  ================    ================  ===============

BASIC AND DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE
COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING                                    9,436,225           9,436,225         9,436,225        9,418,626
                                                          ===============  ================    ================  ===============
</TABLE>

                  See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

                                                4

<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                          Aspeon, Inc.
                             Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
                                          (Unaudited)

                                                                                      Nine Months Ended
                                                                                           March 31,
                                                                                   2001                 2000
                                                                            -----------------    -----------------
<S>                                                                         <C>                  <C>
CASH FLOW PROVIDED BY / (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES

NET (LOSS)                                                                  $    (14,703,700)    $    (39,427,800)

ADJUSTMENTS TO RECONCILE NET (LOSS) TO NET CASH
PROVIDED BY / (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES
      Cumulative  Effect of Accounting Change                                              0             (817,600)
      Depreciation and Amortization                                                1,630,100            3,681,300
      Warrant Valuation Adjustment                                                         0             (137,800)
      Amortization of Deferred Stock-Based Compensation                                    0               83,200
      Impairment Charge                                                                    0           20,030,900
      Disposal of Assets                                                           7,276,100           (1,252,900)
      Write-Off of Assets                                                                  0              324,100
      Net Change in Allowance Accounts                                                     0            4,275,900
      Penalty Interest on Manditorily Redeemable Preferred Stock                   1,662,300              913,100

CHANGES IN OPERATING ASSETS & LIABILITIES
      (Increase)/Decrease in Accounts Receivable                                   2,368,900             (577,800)
      (Increase)/Decrease in Inventories                                           4,609,500            8,433,000
      (Increase)/Decrease in Income Tax Recievable                                         0            2,413,700
      (Increase)/Decrease in Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets              (709,200)             438,200
      Increase/(Decrease) in Accounts Payable                                     (2,168,600)          (1,317,300)
      Increase/(Decrease) in Accrued Expenses                                        478,200           (3,381,100)
      Increase/(Decrease) in Customer Deposits                                      (723,700)            (820,200)
      Increase/(Decrease) in Deferrred Revenues                                     (384,000)             190,300
                                                                            -----------------    -----------------
      Total Cash Flow provided by / (used in) Operating Activities                  (664,100)          (6,948,800)

CASH FLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
      Purchase of Fixed Assets                                                      (311,700)            (899,900)
      Cash Paid for Purchased Businesses                                                   0             (427,000)
      Proceeds from Sale of Assets                                                                        900,000
      Proceeds from Sale of Securities                                                     0            1,025,200
      Notes Advanced to Related Parties                                                    0             (400,000)
      Repayment of Notes Due From Related Parties                                          0              706,000
                                                                            -----------------    -----------------
      Total Cash Flow provided by / (used in) Investing Activities                  (311,700)             904,300

CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
      Net Borrowing / (Repayments) Under Line of Credit                             (862,200)            (839,600)
      Current Obligations Converted to Long-Term Debt                              1,115,300                    0
      Preferred Stock Dividend Paid                                                        0             (553,300)
      Repayment of Notes Payable and Capital Leases                                 (486,100)            (772,500)
                                                                            -----------------    -----------------
      Total Cash Flow provided by / (used in)  Financing Activities                 (233,000)          (2,165,400)

EFFECTS OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH                                             207,400              (92,800)

INCREASE / (DECREASE) IN CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS                            $     (1,001,400)    $     (8,302,700)
                                                                            =================    =================

Cash and Cash Equivalents at the beginning of the period                    $      1,179,100     $      8,853,200
                                                                            =================    =================
Cash and Cash Equivalents at the end of the period                          $        177,700     $        550,500
                                                                            =================    =================

SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid for interest                                                      $         49,400     $        829,500
                                                                            -----------------    -----------------
Cash paid for income tax                                                    $              0     $        144,600
                                                                            -----------------    -----------------
</TABLE>

                  See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

                                                5

<PAGE>

                                  ASPEON, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Note. 1           General

         We were  incorporated  in the Sate of Delaware in September  1995 under
the name Sunwood Research,  Inc. We changed our name to Javelin Systems, Inc. in
October 1996 and  subsequently  to Aspeon,  Inc. in December  1999.  Our mailing
address is 2460 West 26th Avenue, Suite 380-C, Denver,  Colorado,  80211 and our
telephone number is 303-380-9784.

         Effective  June 30, 2003 we made the  decision to  discontinue  all our
remaining  operating  businesses  and are now focused on  reaching  satisfactory
negotiated  settlements  with our outstanding  creditors,  vigorously  defending
against any further  appeal that may be made  against our  currently  successful
defense of the law suit  brought  against  us by  certain  of our  shareholders,
bringing our financial records and SEC filings up to date,  seeking a listing on
the over the  counter  bulletin  board,  raising  debt and,  or,  equity to fund
negotiated  settlements  with our  creditors  and to meet our ongoing  operating
expenses and attempting to merge with another entity with experienced management
and  opportunities for growth in return for shares of our common stock to create
value for our shareholders. There can be no assurance that this series of events
will be successfully completed.

            Prior  to  our  cessation  of  operations,  our  principal  business
activities were:

    - POS PRODUCTS.  Javelin Systems, a division of Aspeon, Inc. ("Javelin") and
CCI Group, Inc. ("CCI"), a subsidiary of Aspeon, Inc.,  designed,  manufactured,
marketed  and sold open system  touch  screen  point of sale  ("POS")  computers
primarily to the foodservice and retail industries (the "POS Products").

    -SOLUTION SERVICES.  Through our CCI, Jade Communications  Limited ("Jade"),
RGB/Trinet Limited ("RGB"), (subsequently renamed Javelin Holdings International
Limited (UK)),  (collectively "RGB/Jade") and Aspact IT Services (Singapore) Pte
Ltd. ("Aspact")  subsidiaries,  we provided  information  technology  management
services  for  customers  that did not intend or were not able to hire their own
information  technology  personnel  (the  "Solution  Services").  These services
included network design and management,  installation of computer systems, local
and wide area network support, maintenance and repair, and help desk support.

    - APPLICATION SERVICES PROVIDER. Through our Aspeon Solutions, Inc. ("Aspeon
Solutions"),  Dynamic  Technologies,  Inc.  ("DTI"),  SB Holdings,  Inc. ("SB"),
Restaurant   Consulting  Services  ("RCS")  and  Monument  Software  Corporation
("Monument")  subsidiaries,  we  operated  as an  application  service  provider
("ASP"). Our ASP services enabled software applications to be deployed, managed,
supported and upgraded from centrally located servers, rather than on individual
computers (the "ASP Services").  Our ASP Services primarily were directed toward
customers in the foodservice industry.

            An over view of the major events since incorporation is as follows:

            On November 1, 1996,  we completed an initial  public  offering (the
"IPO")  of  850,000  shares of our  common  stock at $5.00  per  share,  netting
proceeds of approximately $3.2 million. Proceeds were used to repay debt with an
outstanding  balance  of  approximately   $745,000  and  for  general  corporate
purposes.

            In December 1997, we acquired all of the outstanding common stock of
POSNET Computers,  Inc.  ("Posnet") and CCI Group, Inc. ("CCI").  Posnet and CCI
provided  full  turn-key   systems   integration   services,   including  system
consulting, staging, training, deployment, product support and maintenance.


                                       6
<PAGE>

            In  March  and  April  1998,  we  established  three   international
subsidiaries to expand our sales and distribution  channels in the international
marketplace.  The  international  subsidiaries  were:  Javelin Systems  (Europe)
Limited   ("Javelin   Europe")   headquartered   in  England;   Javelin  Systems
International Pte Ltd ("Javelin Asia")  headquartered in Singapore;  and Javelin
Systems Australia Pty Limited ("Javelin Australia"), subsequently renamed Aspeon
Systems (Asia Pacific) Pty Ltd, headquartered in Australia.

            In May 1998,  Javelin Asia  acquired all of the  outstanding  common
stock  of  Aspact  IT  Services  (Singapore)  Pte  Ltd  ("Aspact").  Aspact  was
headquartered  in  Singapore  and  provided  consulting  and system  integration
services.

            In November 1998, we completed a public offering of 1,395,000 shares
of our common stock at $6.75 per share,  netting proceeds of approximately  $8.1
million. Proceeds were used to repay borrowings under a revolving line of credit
of approximately  $3.2 million,  to purchase all of the outstanding common stock
of RGB/Trinet Limited ("RGB"),  which was subsequently  renamed Javelin Holdings
International Limited (UK), and Jade Communications Ltd ("Jade") and for general
corporate  purposes.  RGB and Jade were  headquartered  in England and  provided
complementary  Wide Area  Networking  (WAN)  products and services  primarily to
large retail, hospitality, and telecommunications companies.

            During the  course of 1998 we  established  a 75% owned  subsidiary,
Teneo Ltd ("Teneo"), in an effort to expand our service management and wide area
network solutions business.

            In January 1999  the business and assets of Posnet were  transferred
from Posnet and merged with the business and assets of CCI.

            In February 1999, we completed a public offering of 2,375,000 shares
of our common stock at $12.25 per share, netting proceeds of approximately $26.9
million.  Proceeds were used to purchase the outstanding common stock of Dynamic
Technologies,  Inc. ("DTI") and SB Holdings, Inc. ("SB") and for working capital
and general  corporate  purposes.  DTI and SB provided custom  Internet/Intranet
software and services.

            In August 1999, we acquired all of the outstanding  capital stock of
Restaurant  Consulting  Services,  Inc. ("RCS").  RCS implemented,  operated and
supported packaged software applications for the restaurant industry.

            In  January  2000,  we  created  Aspeon  Solutions,   Inc.  ("Aspeon
Solutions")  as a wholly owned  subsidiary to centralize  and continue the rapid
development of our ASP service business.

            On March 8, 2000 we completed a private placement of securities with
Marshall Capital  Management,  Inc., an affiliate of Credit Suisse First Boston,
in  which  we sold an  aggregate  of  10,000  shares  of  Series  A  Convertible
Exchangeable  Preferred  Stock  (the  "Preferred  Stock"),  a warrant to acquire
583,334 shares of our common stock and a warrant to acquire  1,250,000 shares of
Aspeon Solutions, one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. Proceeds to us from this
placement  amounted  to $9.6  million,  net of offering  costs,  which were used
primarily to acquire Monument Software Corporation  ("Monument"),  settle future
contingent  payments associated with the acquisition of RCS, hire management and
staff  personnel,   expand  corporate  facilities  and  fund  our  ASP  Services
operations. Monument specialized in the rapid implementation of enterprise-class
financial systems with an emphasis on Oracle Financials




                                       7
<PAGE>


            During  fiscal  2000,  we  sustained  significant  losses and we had
experienced negative cash flows from our operations since inception.  As at June
30,  2000 we were in default of  certain  covenants  under the terms of both our
credit  facility  and  Preferred  Stock and were  delinquent  in the  payment of
various  trade  payables.  Our ability to meet our  obligations  in the ordinary
course of business was  dependent  upon the success of our attempts to return to
profitability,  obtain a waiver of credit  line and  Preferred  Stock  defaults,
raise additional financing through public and, or, private equity financings and
evaluate potential strategic opportunities. We sought to return to profitability
by  streamlining  operations  and  generating  on-going  cost  savings and began
evaluating  strategic  opportunities  for our sale or the sale of certain of our
subsidiaries.

            As part of our efforts to streamline our  operations,  during fiscal
2001 we merged the business of Javelin Asia into Javelin  Australia  and renamed
Javelin  Australia as Aspeon  Systems  (Asia  Pacific) Pty Ltd and we merged the
operations of Monument into those of RCS.

         In August  2000,  we executed a sale  agreement  with the then  current
director of Aspact (the "Purchaser"). The initial purchase price of $350,000 was
payable  to us in  monthly  installments  of  $14,600  commencing  in July 2001.
Consequently,  a loss on sale of  approximately  $229,000 was  recognized in the
three months ended September 30, 2000. In the event the Purchaser consummated an
initial  public  offering or disposed  of all or  substantially  all of Aspact's
common stock,  the  Purchaser was required to pay: a) the unpaid  balance of the
initial  consideration  and b) 50% of the net proceeds received from the initial
public  offering  less the amount  paid  under  (a),  in an amount not to exceed
$200,000. Concurrent with the sale agreement, the Purchaser was terminated as an
employee of ours.

         In   September    2000,   at   the    insistence   of   our   auditors,
PricewaterhouseCoopers,  LLC  ("PWC"),  we announced  that we would  restate our
first quarter 2000 financial statements as a result of accounting misstatements.
In October 2000 we announced we would require  additional  time to file our form
10-K report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000.

          In October 2000, the Nasdaq Stock Market ("Nasdaq")  suspended trading
in our common stock while it sought additional  information from us. On November
9, 2000, we participated  in a hearing before the Nasdaq Listing  Qualifications
Panel which was held for the purpose of evaluating  whether shares of our common
stock would continue to be listed on Nasdaq or if they would be delisted.









                                       8
<PAGE>

         In October and November 2000,  eight  purported  class action  lawsuits
were  filed  against  us, our Chief  Executive  Officer,  and our  former  Chief
Financial  Officer in the United States District Court for the Central  District
of California  for alleged  violations of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934.
After the  defendants  moved to dismiss each of the actions,  the lawsuits  were
consolidated   under  a  single  action,   entitled  "In  re  Aspeon  Securities
Litigation,"  Case No. SACV 00-995 AHS (ANx),  and the appointed  lead plaintiff
voluntarily filed an amended and consolidated complaint. The defendants moved to
dismiss  that  complaint  and on April  23,  2001  the  Court  entered  an order
dismissing the complaint without  prejudice.  On May 21, 2001 the appointed lead
plaintiff  filed a third  complaint,  styled  as a "First  Amended  Consolidated
Complaint." On June 4, 2001 the  defendants  moved to dismiss this complaint and
on September 17, 2001 the United States  District Court  dismissed the suit with
prejudice and entered judgment in favor of the us and our officers. On September
20,  2001 the lead  plaintiff  in the class  action  suit  appealed  against the
dismissal of the case.  On January 21, 2003 the decision to dismiss the case was
upheld  but  the  lead  plaintiff  was  given  the  opportunity  to  remedy  the
deficiencies  in the complaint that had been filed.  Accordingly on May 30, 2003
the plaintiff filed its "Second Amended Consolidated  Complaint" which again was
subsequently  dismissed  by the  District  Court.  On November 26, 2003 the lead
plaintiff  filed its  "Third  Amended  Consolidated  Complaint"  which was again
dismissed  with  prejudice in March 2004. The lead plaintiff once again appealed
against  the  dismissal  and the United  States  Court of Appeals  for the Ninth
Circuit  affirmed the dismissal with prejudice on February 23, 2006. This is the
fifth  time  that  the  Courts  have  ruled  in  favor  of us  and  against  the
shareholders  who have  brought  this suit  against us. On each of the  previous
occasions the  shareholders  who have brought this suit against us have filed an
appeal  against the decision of the Courts.  There can be no assurance  that the
shareholders  who have  brought  this  suit  against  us will not file a further
appeal  against  the  Courts'  latest  ruling in which case we will  continue to
vigorously defend against the claims.

         In December 2000 we restated the results for the fiscal  quarters ended
September 30, 1999, December 31, 1999 and March 31, 2000 by an aggregate of $1.7
million or $0.19 per share.  Revenue was reduced by $679,000 or 1.05%, our gross
profit was  decreased  by $206,000  or 1.22%,  $1.4  million of the  restatement
related to an  adjustment  to increase the amount  recorded  for the  beneficial
conversion  feature associated with the issuance of our Preferred Stock in March
2000 based upon an independent  valuation and the remaining  adjustments related
to unrecorded compensation expense, amortization of intangible assets, expensing
costs previously capitalized and the additional accrual of general expenses.

         Effective  as of  January  4,  2001 our  shares of  common  stock  were
delisted  from Nasdaq.  As we were in arrears with our filings with the SEC, our
shares of common  stock were not  eligible  to be traded on the over the counter
bulletin  board and  commenced  trading  on the Pink  Sheets  under  the  symbol
ASPE.PK. Subsequently our shares of common stock ceased to be traded on the Pink
Sheets and are now traded on the Gray Sheets.

         In January 2001 our auditors,  PWC, notified us that it was terminating
its auditor relationship with us effective immediately.

         In February  2001 our  subsidiary,  RGB,  sold its interest in Teneo to
employees of Teneo for the consideration of a $350,000 note. Consequently a gain
on sale of $432,000 was recognized during the quarter ended March 31, 2001.

         On March 1, 2001 we completed the sale of the consulting  contracts and
certain of the fixed assets our DTI subsidiary to a company  controlled by DTI's
former owners and certain of our  shareholders  for a purchase price of $900,000
and the return for  cancellation of 200,000 of shares of our common stock valued
at $60,000.  With the  completion of the transfer of its help desk business to a
third party on April 27, 2001, the business  activities of DTI ceased. A gain on
the sale of the net assets of DTI totaling  $820,900 was  recognized  during the
quarter ended March 31, 2001.

                                       9
<PAGE>

         On  March  19,  2001  we  retained  BDO  Seidman,  LLP  ("BDO")  as our
independent auditing firm. However, as PWC, our previous  independent  auditors,
refused to allow BDO access to PWC's prior year work  papers,  BDO was unable to
complete an audit of our financial statements for later periods at that time.

         During fiscal 2001,  despite our efforts to return to profitability and
the sale of certain of our  subsidiaries,  we continued to generate  significant
losses,  to be in default of certain  covenants under the terms of our Preferred
Stock,  to be delinquent  in the payment of various trade  payables and had been
unable to replace  our line of credit  which had been  repaid in full during the
course of the year.  While we had  appointed  new  auditors,  we were  unable to
generate  audited  financial  accounts due to the lack of  cooperation  from our
previous  auditors  and  consequently  were  unable to comply  with the  listing
requirements  of  either  Nasdaq or the over the  counter  bulletin  board.  Our
relegation  to the Pink Sheets had  serious  adverse  consequences  for both the
confidence  of our  customers or potential  customers and our ability to attract
new debt or equity financing.  The lawsuits brought against us by certain of our
shareholders  diverted a significant  amount of our  management's  time from our
operations which were also severely  effected by the collapse of the tech market
in early 2001.  Nevertheless we continued press ahead by attempting to return to
profitability  through  further cost  reductions,  renegotiate  the terms of our
Preferred  Stock,  settle  the  outstanding  shareholder  litigation,   evaluate
strategic  opportunities for our sale or the sale of certain of our subsidiaries
and raise additional debt and, or, equity funding.

         In August 2001 we, together with our Chief Executive  Officer,  filed a
six count complaint  against our former  auditors,  PWC,  alleging  professional
negligence,   intentional  interference  with  prospective  business  advantage,
negligent  interference  with  prospective  economic  advantage,   violation  of
California   Business  and  Professions  Code  Sections  17200  and  17500,  and
defamation.

         On March 22, 2002 we signed an  agreement  to sell our  subsidiary  RGB
(renamed  Javelin Holdings  International  Ltd.), the UK holding company that in
turn owned our Javelin Europe and Jade subsidiaries, to an investment group that
included  members  of the  existing  UK  management  team for  $125,995  and the
repayment of inter-company  debt.  $750,000 was paid on signing with $175,000 to
be paid upon completion of a technology escrow agreement

         On May 1, 2002 we signed an agreement  with the holder of our Preferred
Shares  that had been in  default.  Under that  agreement,  in return for a cash
payment of $447,500 by us (a) we were released from all liabilities  relating to
our  outstanding  Series A  Convertible  Exchangeable  Preferred  Stock  and the
documents under which those securities had been issued and were outstanding; (b)
all of our outstanding  Series A Convertible  Exchangeable  Preferred Stock were
cancelled; (c) a warrant previously issued by us entitling the holder thereof to
purchase  583,334  shares of our common stock was  cancelled;  and (d) a warrant
previously  issued by our  subsidiary,  Aspeon  Solutions,  entitling the holder
thereof to purchase 1,250,000 shares of the common stock of Aspeon Solutions was
cancelled.  We believed  that the  settlement  had a net positive  effect on our
balance sheet of approximately $19 million.

         In June 2002 we terminated the activities of RCS.

         On  January  17,  2003,  we sold  our  Australian  subsidiary,  Javelin
Australia,  to Mr. Matthew Maley. Prior to the sale, Mr. Maley had served as our
general manager of that  subsidiary.  We received $80,000 at the closing of this
transaction.  Under the Share Sale Agreement  relating to this transaction,  Mr.
Maley agreed to cause Javelin  Australia to pay its account payable to us in the
amount of $239,000 in monthly installments of $10,000 each until the full amount
of the account  payable has been paid.  Mr. Maley  personally  guaranteed  these
payments.

                                       10
<PAGE>

         During the fiscal  years  ending June 30, 2002 and 2003,  we used every
effort to return to profitability  through  on-going cost  reductions,  to raise
additional debt and, or, equity funding and to identify strategic  opportunities
for our sale or the sale of certain of our subsidiaries  However,  the weak tech
market,  together with our inability to produce  audited  accounts and come into
compliance  with the listing  conditions of Nasdaq or over the counter  bulletin
board  markets,  meant we were  unable to attract new  customers  or the debt or
equity financing necessary to secure our financial future.

         On June 30, 2003 we decided to  discontinue  the operations of our last
two  operating  businesses,  Javelin and CCI.  Javelin  ceased  operations  with
immediate effect while CCI completed certain outstanding  customer orders before
ceasing  production  on August  3, 2003 and  continued  to  subcontract  certain
maintenance activities through December 31, 2003.

         In August  2003 we reached an out of court  settlement  in our law suit
against  PWC.  Under the terms of the  settlement  we received a payment of $1.3
million and agreement to write off certain  outstanding  invoices for accounting
and  legal  fees.  Consequently  we  recognized  a  gain  of  $1,007,000  on the
settlement  although  the net cash we  received  after  all costs  totaled  only
$136,000.

         In December  2003,  we  appointed  attorney  Frank G Blundo Jr. P.C. as
trustee in an  assignment  for the  benefit of the  creditors  of Aspeon and CCI
commencing effective January 1, 2004. Effective January 1, 2004, all of Aspeon's
and CCI's assets were transferred to the trustee for the benefit of those Aspeon
and CCI creditors who elected to  participate  in the assignment for the benefit
of Aspeon and CCI creditors.  The assets  transferred had a fair market value of
$496,000 and creditors totaling $3.7 million elected to participate and be bound
by the terms of the assignment for the benefit of Aspeon and CCI creditors under
which they no longer had any further claim against  Aspeon or CCI.  Consequently
we recognized a gain of $3.2 million on the  establishment of the assignment for
the  benefit  of Aspeon and CCI  creditors.  Certain  Aspeon and CCI  creditors,
totaling in excess of $3.1 million, elected not to participate in the assignment
for the  benefit  of  Aspeon  and CCI  creditors  and  remained  as  outstanding
liabilities of Aspeon and CCI.

         Following  the  establishment  for the  assignment  for the  benefit of
Aspeon  and CCI  creditors  in January  2004,  we had no  assets,  no  operating
business or other source of income,  outstanding  liabilities  in excess of $7.9
million,  an  outstanding  law  suit  brought  against  us  by  certain  of  our
shareholders,  were  substantially  in arrears in  respect  of  maintaining  our
financial  records and our SEC filings,  were no longer  listed on Nasdaq or the
over the  counter  bulletin  board and in due course  ceased to be listed on the
Pink Sheets.

         In April 2005, we appointed  David J Cutler as a new director and Chief
Executive   Officer  and   subsequent  to  that  are  now  focused  on  reaching
satisfactory  negotiated settlements with our outstanding creditors,  vigorously
defending  against any further  appeal  that may be made  against our  currently
successful  defense  of the  law  suit  brought  against  us by  certain  of our
shareholders, bringing our financial records and SEC filings up to date, seeking
a listing on the over the counter bulletin board,  raising  additional debt and,
or,  equity  to  finance  settlements  with  creditors  and to meet our  ongoing
operating  expenses and attempting to merge with another entity with experienced
management and opportunities for growth in return for shares of our common stock
to create value for our shareholders.





                                       11
<PAGE>


         On April 22, 2005,  our sole  director,  David J Cutler entered into an
agreement  with Frank G Blundo,  Jr.  P.C.,  trustee of the  assignment  for the
benefit of Aspeon and CCI creditors,  subject to due diligence,  to invest up to
$50,000  cash in us for the benefit of our  creditors  in return for a number of
shares of our common stock to be determined. Following the completion of the due
diligence process during the three months ended December 31, 2005, it was agreed
with Frank G Blundo,  Jr.  P.C.,  trustee of the  assignment  for the benefit of
Aspeon and CCI  creditors,  that Mr.  Cutler would invest  $20,000 in us for the
benefit  of Aspeon  and CCI  creditors  in return  for a number of shares of our
common  stock to be  determined.  Accordingly  during  the  three  months  ended
December 31, 2005  $20,000  which had been placed in escrow with Frank G Blundo,
Jr. P.C. by Mr. Cutler was released for the benefit of Aspeon and CCI creditors.
On May 31, 2006, based on an independent third party valuation,  the majority of
our independent  directors approved the issue of 10,536,775 shares of our common
stock to Mr.  Cutler for the  conversion  of  $14,243  of his debt into  equity.
Following  the issue of these shares of our common stock Mr.  Cutler owned 52.7%
of  our  total  authorized  and  issued  share  capital  and  still  had a  loan
outstanding to us of approximately $178,000.

         On  September  9, 2005 we received a letter from the SEC dated June 24,
2005  indicating  that  unless  we  came  into  compliance  with  the  reporting
requirements under the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 within 15 days we may be
deregistered.  On  September  12, 2005 we faxed a letter to the SEC's  Office of
Enforcement  Liaison  indicating our intention to come into  compliance with the
reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by November 15,
2005.

         On  September  12,  2005  we  retained  Larry   O'Donnell,   CPA,  P.C.
(`O'Donnell') as our independent auditing firm.

         By November  15, 2005 we  completed  all  required  SEC filings for the
period July 1, 2003 through  September 30, 2005.  However,  we had not completed
all required SEC filings in respect of the period April 1, 2001 through June 30,
2003 although we had included  substantial  financial  extracts and all material
disclosures  in respect  of these  periods in the  filings we had  completed  in
respect  of  subsequent  periods.  We  believed  the  cost  to  shareholders  in
completing  these  filings in  respect of these  earlier  periods  exceeded  any
benefit to shareholders in completing  these filings as the information in these
filings  was at  least  two  to  four  years  old,  no  longer  relevant  to our
shareholders given our decision to cease all trading operations made on June 30,
2003 and that all material  information in respect of these earlier  periods has
been made available to our shareholders in our SEC filings for later periods.

         In January 2006 we were  contacted  by the SEC's Office of  Enforcement
Liaison who notified us that while they  recognized  the progress we had made in
bringing our SEC filings up to date,  they still  considered us to be delinquent
in our  filings  because of our  failure to  complete  filings in respect of the
period  April 1, 2001 through  June 30,  2003.  In August 2006,  on the basis of
further  audit work and a review of  subsequent  events  performed by O'Donnell,
O'Donnell  completed the audit of our June 30, 2001 financial  statements and in
September 2006 we filed the Forms 10QSB for the three months ended September 30,
2001,  the three and six months  ended  December 31, 2001 and the three and nine
months ended March 31, 2002. We are currently  establishing the likely costs and
practicality of completing the SEC filings and related financial  statements for
the period April 1, 2002 through June 30, 2003. In the meantime there  continues
to be a risk that our shares of common  stock may be  deregistered  by the SEC's
Office of Enforcement  Liaison due the continued  delinquency of our SEC filings
for the period April 1, 2002 through June 30, 2003.

         On February  23, 2006 the United  States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit affirmed the dismissal with prejudice of the law suit brought against us
by certain  of our  shareholders.  This is the fifth  time that the Courts  have
ruled in favor of us and against the  shareholders  who have  brought  this suit
against us. On each of the previous  occasions the shareholders who have brought
this suit  against us have filed an appeal  against the  decision of the Courts.
There can be no  assurance  that the  shareholders  who have  brought  this suit
against us will not file a further  appeal  against the Courts' latest ruling in
which case we will continue to vigorously defend against the claims.

                                       12
<PAGE>

         Effective March 13, 2006, David Cutler,  at that time our sole director
and officer,  appointed  Wesley F Whiting and Redgie Green as new, non executive
directors to join him on our board of directors.

         On May 31, 2006,  based on an independent  third party  valuation,  the
majority of our independent directors approved the issue of 10,536,775 shares of
our common stock to Mr.  Cutler for the  conversion  of $14,243 of his debt into
equity. Following the issue of these shares of our common stock Mr. Cutler owned
52.7% of our total  authorized  and issued  share  capital  and still had a loan
outstanding to us of approximately $178,000.

         In August  2006,  on the basis of  further  audit  work and a review of
subsequent events performed by O'Donnell,  O'Donnell  completed the audit of our
June 30, 2001  financial  statements  and in  September  2006 we filed the Forms
10QSB for the three months ended  September  30, 2001,  the three and six months
ended  December 31, 2001 and the three and nine months ended March 31, 2002.  We
are currently  establishing  the likely costs and practicality of completing the
SEC  filings  and  related  financial  statements  for the period  April 1, 2002
through June 30, 2003.  In the  meantime  there  continues to be a risk that our
shares of common stock may be  deregistered  by the SEC's Office of  Enforcement
Liaison due the continued delinquency of our SEC filings for the period April 1,
2002 through June 30, 2003.


Note. 2           Basis of Presentation

         The accompanying  unaudited  financial  statements of Aspeon, Inc. have
been prepared in accordance with generally  accepted  accounting  principles for
interim  financial  information  and with the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB and
Article  10 of  Regulation  S-X.  Accordingly,  they do not  include  all of the
information and footnotes required by generally accepted  accounting  principles
for  complete  financial  statements.  In our opinion the  financial  statements
include all adjustments  (consisting of normal recurring  accruals) necessary in
order to make the financial statements not misleading. Operating results for the
nine month period  ended March 31, 2002 are not  necessarily  indicative  of the
results that may be expected for the year ended June 30, 2002. For more complete
financial information,  these unaudited consolidated financial statements should
be read in  conjunction  with  the  audited  consolidated  financial  statements
included in our Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB for the years ended June 30, 2001,
2004 and 2005 filed with the SEC.

         Due to the dispute  with our  previous  auditors,  PWC, and our lack of
funds,  the last Form 10-K we filed on a current  basis was filed in  respect of
our  financial  year  ended  June 30,  2000 and the last Form 10-Q we filed on a
current  basis was in respect of the three and nine month period ended March 31,
2001. No further  filings were  completed  until October 28, 2005 when,  between
October 28, 2005 and November  15,  2005,  we filed all required SEC filings and
related  financial  statements for the period July 1, 2003 through September 30,
2005.  However,  we had not  completed  all  required  SEC  filings  and related
financial  statements  in respect of the period  April 1, 2001  through June 30,
2003 although we had included  substantial  financial  extracts and all material
disclosures  in respect  of these  periods in the  filings we had  completed  in
respect  of  subsequent  periods.  We  believed  the  cost  to  shareholders  in
completing  these  filings in  respect of these  earlier  periods  exceeded  any
benefit to shareholders in completing  these filings as the information in these
filings  was at  least  two  to  four  years  old,  no  longer  relevant  to our
shareholders given our decision to cease all trading operations made on June 30,
2003 and that all material  information in respect of these earlier  periods has
been made available to our shareholders in our SEC filings for later periods all
filings were completed

         In January 2006 we were  contacted  by the SEC's Office of  Enforcement
Liaison who notified us that while they  recognized  the progress we had made in
bringing our SEC filings up to date,  they still  considered us to be delinquent
in our  filings  because of our  failure to  complete  filings in respect of the
period April 1, 2001 through June 30, 2003.

                                       13
<PAGE>

         In August  2006,  on the basis of  further  audit  work and a review of
subsequent  events performed by O'Donnell,  O'Donnell has completed the audit of
our June 30, 2001 financial  statements and in September 2006 we filed our Forms
10-QSB for the three months ended  September 30, 2001,  the three and six months
ended December 31, 2001 and the three and nine months ended March 31, 2002.

         We are  currently  establishing  the likely costs and  practicality  of
completing the SEC filings and related financial statements for the period April
1, 2002 through June 30, 2003. In the meantime there continues to be a risk that
our  shares  of  common  stock  may be  deregistered  by  the  SEC's  Office  of
Enforcement  Liaison due the  continued  delinquency  of our SEC filings for the
period April 1, 2002 through June 30, 2003

         We have also included unaudited and audited extracts from our financial
statements  for the period July 1, 2001 through June 30, 2005 on pages 78 though
80 below.

Note. 3           Liquidity

                  As  of  March  31,  2002,  we  had $  178,000  cash  and  cash
equivalents  on  hand,  a  working  capital  deficit  of $  22.1  million  and a
shareholders' deficit of $18.8 million.

                  As of June 30, 2006,  we had $7 cash on hand,  $195 of assets,
no operating  business or other  source of income,  outstanding  liabilities  of
approximately  $8.1  million,  a  stockholders'  deficit of  approximately  $8.1
million and a law suit brought against us by certain of our  shareholders  which
had been  ruled in our favor by the  Courts  but  which  could be  subject  to a
further appeal by the shareholders in question.

            We sustained significant losses during the years ended June 30, 2001
and 2000 and had  experienced  negative  cash  flows from  operations  since our
inception.

         In October  2000,  we received a notice of default  from our  Preferred
Stockholders,  which  triggered  certain  payment  requirements  as  well  as  a
Repricing and Redemption Event, as defined in the Preferred Stock Agreement (see
Note 12 - page 28 below).  We were also  delinquent  in the  payments of various
trade payables.  These matters, among others, raised substantial doubt as to our
ability to continue as a going  concern.  Our continued  existence was dependent
upon, among other factors, our ability to return to profitability, the continued
forbearance of the our lenders and creditors,  the successful  renegotiation  of
the terms of our Preferred  Stock,  the outcome of  litigation  filed against us
which  alleged  violations of the federal  securities  laws (Note 17 see page 39
below),  and our ability to raise funds from additional debt and, or, equity. We
had reduced our workforce and planed to further reduce expenditures. We believed
that such reductions,  the securing of a new working capital borrowing facility,
together  with  funds  expected  to  be  generated  from  operations,  would  be
sufficient to meet our expected short-term needs for working capital,  exclusive
of any  obligation to redeem our Preferred  Stock as discussed in Note 12 - page
28 below. However,  there could be no assurance that sufficient cash flows would
be generated by us to avoid the further  depletion of our working capital,  that
we would successfully  renegotiate the terms of our Preferred Stock, or that the
outcome  of the  litigation  would  not have a  material  adverse  impact on our
operations.  Accordingly,  management  intended  to  obtain  additional  debt or
private equity financing.  There could be no assurance that such additional debt
or  equity  financing  would be  available,  if and  when  needed,  or that,  if
available, such financing could be completed on commercially favorable terms.

         Subsequently  we were  unable  to  improve  the  profitability  or cash
generation of our operations or to obtain additional debt or equity.  During the
years  ended June 30, 2002 and 2003 we had no  alternative  but to sell or close
down our remaining operating  businesses leaving a substantial short fall to our
creditors.


                                       14
<PAGE>


            Consequently we are now dependent on raising  additional equity and,
or, debt to fund any negotiated  settlements with our outstanding  creditors and
meet our ongoing operating expenses.  There is no assurance that we will be able
to raise the  necessary  equity  and,  or,  debt that we will need to be able to
negotiate  acceptable  settlements  with our  outstanding  creditors or fund our
ongoing operating expenses.

            If we were to be subject to any further  appeal which may be made in
respect of the law suit brought against us by certain of our  shareholders it is
unlikely that the proceeds from our  Directors' and Officers'  insurance  policy
would  be  sufficient  to  meet  the  damages  assessed  and we  would  have  no
alternative but to file for bankruptcy.

         During  the  fiscal  years  ended  June 30,  2006 and 2005,  one of our
directors,  David J Cutler,  advanced to us $115,000 and $88,000 respectively by
way of loan,  bearing interest at 8%, to meet our ongoing operating expenses and
fund the costs of bringing  our  financial  statements  and SEC  reporting up to
date. $14,000 of this loan was converted to equity effective May 31, 2006. Since
June 30, 2006 Mr. Cutler has continued to make further  advances to us by way of
loan to meet our ongoing  operating  expenses and fund the costs of bringing our
financial  statements  and SEC  reporting  up to date as  required.  There is no
assurance  that Mr. Cutler will  continue to provide us with further  funding in
the future.

         It is our current  intention to seek to reach  satisfactory  negotiated
settlements  with our  outstanding  creditors,  vigorously  defend  against  any
further appeal that may be made against our currently  successful defense of the
law suit brought against us by certain of our shareholders,  bring our financial
records  and SEC  filings  up to date,  seek a listing  on the over the  counter
bulletin  board,  raise debt and, or,  equity  financing to fund the  negotiated
settlements  with our  creditors  and to meet  ongoing  operating  expanses  and
attempt  to  merge  with  another   entity  with   experienced   management  and
opportunities  for growth in return  for  shares of our  common  stock to create
value for our  shareholders.  There is no  assurance  that this series of events
will be satisfactorily completed.

Note. 4           Basis of Consolidation

         The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts
of Aspeon  and its  wholly-owned  subsidiaries.  All  significant  inter-company
transactions and balances have been eliminated.

Note. 5           Acquisitions and Dispositions

         From  December   1997  to  March  2000  we   established  a  number  of
subsidiaries   to  conduct  our  operating   activities   and  purchased   other
subsidiaries  for a  combination  of shares of our common  stock and cash.  From
August  2000 to  December  2003 our  liquidity  problems  were such that we were
forced to sell,  or  discontinue,  all of our  operating  businesses.  Our final
operating  activities  terminated in December 2003 and our remaining assets were
transferred  to the trustee of the  assignment for the benefit of the Aspeon and
CCI  creditors  effective  January 1, 2004.  A summary of our  acquisitions  and
disposals is as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

<S>                                         <C>                                 <C>
Aspeon, Inc.                                established September 1995.         ceased trading operations as
at June 30, 2003.

                                                                                assets transferred to the trustee
                                                                                for the assignment for the benefit
                                                                                of Aspeon and CCI creditors in January
                                                                                2004


                                       15
<PAGE>

CCI Group, Inc.                             acquired December 1997.             ceased manufacturing in
                                                                                August 2003.

                                                                                ceased providing services in December 2003.


                                                                                assets transferred to the trustee for
                                                                                the assignment for the benefit of
                                                                                Aspeon and CCI creditors in January
                                                                                2004.

Posnet Computers, Inc.                      acquired December 1997.             merged into CCI Group,Inc.
                                                                                in January 1999.

Javelin Systems Europe, Ltd.                established March 1998.             sold March 2002.

Javelin Systems International Ltd           established March 1998.             merged into Javelin Systems
                                                                                Australia Pty Ltd between
June - September 2000.

Javelin Systems Australia Pty Ltd           established March 1998.             sold January 2003.

Aspact IT Services (Singapore) Pte Ltd      acquired May 1998.                  sold August 2000.

Javelin Holdings International Ltd          acquired November 1998.             sold March 2002.
(formerly RGB Trinet Ltd)

Jade Communications, Ltd                    acquired November 1998.             sold March 2002.

Dynamic Technologies, Inc.                  acquired April 1999.                assets sold March 2001.

SB Holdings, Inc.                           acquired April 1999.                assets sold March 2001.

Restaurant Consulting Services, Inc.        acquired August 1999.               ceased trading in June 2002.

Aspeon Solutions, Inc.                      established February 2000.          dormant from June 2002.

Teneo Ltd (75% ownership)                   established March 2000.             sold March 2001.

Monument Software Corporation.              acquired March 2000.                merged with RCS in fiscal
                                                                                2001.
</TABLE>

         In August  2000,  we executed a sale  agreement  with the then  current
director of Aspact (the  "Purchaser").  The initial  purchase price of $350,000,
which is  reflected  in other  assets in the  consolidated  balance  sheet,  was
payable  to us in  monthly  installments  of  $14,600  commencing  in July 2001.
Consequently,  a loss on sale of  approximately  $229,000 was recognized for the
fiscal  year ended June 30,  2001.  In the event the  Purchaser  consummated  an
initial  public  offering or disposed  of all or  substantially  all of Aspact's
common stock,  the Purchaser  would be required to pay: a) the unpaid balance of
the  initial  consideration  and b) 50% of the net  proceeds  received  from the
initial  public  offering  less the  amount  paid  under a), in an amount not to
exceed  $200,000.   Concurrent  with  the  sale  agreement,  the  Purchaser  was
terminated as an employee of ours.

                                       16
<PAGE>

         In February  2001,  our  subsidiary,  RGB,  sold its  interest in Teneo
Limited to employees of Teneo for the  consideration of a $350,000 note which is
reflected in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet. Consequently a gain
on sale of $432,000 was recognized during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001.

         On March 1, 2001, we completed the sale of the consulting contracts and
certain of the fixed assets of our Dynamic  Technologies,  Inc. (DTI) subsidiary
to a company controlled by DTI's former owners and certain shareholders of ours,
for a purchase  price of  $900,000  and the return for  cancellation  of 200,000
shares  of our  Common  Stock  valued at  $60,000.  With the  completion  of the
transfer  of its help desk  business  to a third  party on April 27,  2001,  the
business  activities of DTI ceased.  A gain on the sale of the net assets of DTI
totaling $820,900 was recognized during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001.

         On March 22, 2002 we signed an  agreement  to sell our  subsidiary  RGB
(renamed  Javelin Holdings  International  Ltd.), the UK holding company that in
turn owned our Javelin Europe and Jade subsidiaries, to an investment group that
included  members  of the  existing  UK  management  team for  $125,995  and the
repayment of inter-company  debt.  $750,000 was paid on signing with $175,000 to
be paid upon completion of a technology escrow agreement

Note. 6           Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Cash and Cash  Equivalents  -- Cash and  cash  equivalents  consist  of cash and
highly  liquid debt  instruments  with  original  maturities  of less than three
months.

Inventories  -  Inventories  at March 31, 2002 and 2001  consisted  primarily of
point of sale computer  hardware and  components and were stated at the lower of
cost (first-in first-out) or market.

Property and  Equipment-  Property and  equipment  were stated at fair value and
depreciated using the straight-line  method over the following  estimated useful
lives:

Leasehold improvements                               2 - 10 years
Office furniture, fixtures and equipment             5 - 7   years
Computer equipment and software                      3 - 5  years
Equipment on lease                                     3     years
Warehouse equipment                                    7     years
Test equipment                                         7     years
Depot spares                                           7     years
Vehicles                                               5     years

            Maintenance and repairs were charged to expense as incurred, and the
costs of additions and betterments were capitalized. Leasehold improvements were
amortized  over the  shorter of the useful  life of the asset or the life of the
related  lease.  When assets were sold or  otherwise  disposed  of, the cost and
related accumulated depreciation and amortization were removed from the accounts
and any resulting gain or loss was recognized.

Deferred  Costs and Other --  Offering  costs  with  respect  to issue of common
stock,  warrants or options by us were initially  deferred and ultimately offset
against the proceeds from these equity transactions if successful or expensed if
the proposed equity transaction is unsuccessful.

Impairment of Long-Lived  and  Intangible  Assets -- In the event that facts and
circumstances indicated that the cost of long-lived and intangible assets may be
impaired,  an evaluation of recoverability  was performed.  If an evaluation was
required, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset
were  compared to the asset's  carrying  amount to determine if a write-down  to
market value or discounted cash flow value was required.

                                       17
<PAGE>

An  impairment  charge of  $17,366,000  was  recognized  at September  30, 2000,
$16,643,600  in respect of the  goodwill  associated  with the DTI and  Monument
acquisitions  and $741,400 in respect of other intangible  assets.  At March 31,
2001, we recorded an impairment  charge of  $2,664,900.  The provision  includes
charges for the  write-off  of goodwill  associated  with RCS and the  remaining
goodwill of Monument.  A further write off of $3,300,500 was recorded as at June
30, 2001in respect of goodwill and other intangible assets. No impairment charge
was recognized in the nine months ended March 31, 2002.

Financial Instruments -- The estimated fair values for financial instruments was
determined  at  discrete  points in time based on relevant  market  information.
These  estimates  involved  uncertainties  and  could  not  be  determined  with
precision.  The  carrying  amounts  of notes  receivable,  accounts  receivable,
accounts payable and accrued liabilities  approximated fair value because of the
short-term  maturities  of these  instruments.  The fair value of notes  payable
approximated to their carrying value as generally their interest rates reflected
our effective annual borrowing rate.

Income Taxes -- We account for income taxes under the  liability  method,  which
requires  recognition  of deferred tax assets and  liabilities  for the expected
future tax  consequences  of events  that have been  included  in the  financial
statements  or  tax  returns.  Under  this  method,   deferred  tax  assets  and
liabilities  are  determined  based  on the  difference  between  the  financial
statements  and tax bases of assets and  liabilities  using enacted tax rates in
effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.

Foreign  Currency  Translation -- The consolidated  financial  statements of our
non-U.S.  operations were translated into U.S.  dollars for financial  reporting
purposes.  The assets and liabilities of non-U.S.  operations  whose  functional
currencies are other than the U.S. dollar are translated at rates of exchange at
fiscal  year-end,  and revenues and expenses are translated at average  exchange
rates for the fiscal year. The cumulative  translation  effects are reflected in
accumulated other comprehensive  income (loss). Gains and losses on transactions
denominated in other than the functional currency of an operation were reflected
in other income (expense).

Revenue  Recognition -- We sold our hardware and third-party  software  products
both as part of a solutions  package and on a  stand-alone  basis.  Sales of our
products which were part of a solutions  package  typically  included  hardware,
third-party   software  and   installation.   Revenues   associated  with  these
arrangements  were  recognized  upon the completion of the  installation  of the
product.  Sales of  products,  which were part of a solution,  were  included in
products  revenue while  installation  and consulting  services were included in
services  revenue.  Revenues from sales of products sold on a stand-alone  basis
were  recognized  upon shipment to the customer.  Estimated  product returns and
sales allowances were provided for when revenue was recognized.

             Service contract revenues were recognized  ratably over the term of
the related contract. These revenues were generally from maintenance,  help desk
and application services  arrangements.  Revenues earned under time and material
type arrangements were recognized as services were performed, and primarily were
comprised of information technology services.

            Revenues  from  fixed  fee  arrangements  under  which  we  provided
software  customization,  development services,  or significant  implementations
were recognized on the  percentage-of-completion  method of accounting, based on
the costs incurred to total estimated costs. We provided for anticipated  losses
by a charge to income in the period the losses were first identified.

Customer  deposits and deferred  revenues -- Customer  deposits  represent  cash
received in advance of product shipment while deferred revenues  represents cash
received in advance of the performance of service contract revenues.

                                       18
<PAGE>

Warranties--  Our  products  were under  warranty  for defects in  material  and
workmanship for one year. Certain components  included our products were covered
by manufacturers'  warranties.  We established an accrual for estimated warranty
costs when the related revenue was recognized.

Advertising cost -- Advertising costs were expensed as incurred.

Research  and  development  - Research  and  development  costs are  expensed as
incurred.  Research and development expenses  principally  comprised payroll and
related costs, and the cost of prototypes.

Comprehensive Income (Loss) -- Comprehensive income is defined as all changes in
stockholders'  equity (deficit),  exclusive of transactions with owners, such as
capital  investments.  Comprehensive income includes net income or loss, changes
in certain assets and liabilities  that are reported  directly in equity such as
translation  adjustments on investments in foreign  subsidiaries  and unrealized
gains  (losses)  on  available-for-sale  securities.  The net  loss for the nine
months ended March 31, 2002 was $(9,379,000) compared to a comprehensive loss of
$(7,949,000)  a variance of  $1,430,000.  The net loss for the nine months ended
March  31,  2001  was  $(39,428,000)   compared  to  a  comprehensive   loss  of
$(40,070,000)  a  variance  of  $642,000.  In both  years the  variance  related
primarily  to  the  change  in  the  cumulative  foreign  currency   translation
adjustment relating to our non-US  subsidiaries in Australia,  Singapore and the
United Kingdom and unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities.

Income  (Loss)  Per  Share  -- The  income  (loss)  per  share is  presented  in
accordance  with the provisions of Statement of Financial  Accounting  Standards
(SFAS) No. 128,  Earnings Per Share.  SFAS No. 128 replaced the  presentation of
primary and fully diluted earnings (loss) per share (EPS) with a presentation of
basic EPS and diluted  EPS.  Basic EPS is  calculated  by dividing the income or
loss available to common  stockholders by the weighted  average number of common
stock  outstanding for the period.  Diluted EPS reflects the potential  dilution
that could occur if  securities  or other  contracts  to issue common stock were
exercised or converted  into common  stock.  Basic and diluted EPS were the same
for the six  months  ended  December  31,  2001 and 2000 as we had  losses  from
operations and, therefore,  the effect of all additional  potential common stock
was antidilutive.

Stock-Based  Compensation -- As permitted under the SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based  Compensation,  we  account  for  our  stock-based  compensation  in
accordance with the provisions of Accounting  Principles Board (APB) Opinion No.
25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.  As such,  compensation expense is
recorded  on the date of grant if the  current  market  price of the  underlying
stock  exceeds  the  exercise  price.  Certain  pro  forma  net  income  and EPS
disclosures  for employee  stock option grants are also included in the notes to
the financial  statements as if the fair value method as defined in SFAS No. 123
had been applied.  Transactions in equity  instruments  with  non-employees  for
goods or services are accounted for by the fair value method.

Use of Estimates -- The preparation of our consolidated  financial statements in
conformity with generally accepted accounting  principles requires management to
make  estimates  and  assumptions  that  affect the  amounts  reported  in these
financial  statements and accompanying  notes.  Actual results could differ from
those estimates.  Due to uncertainties inherent in the estimation process, it is
possible that these estimates could be materially revised within the next year.

Cumulative  Effect of  Accounting  Change -- Effective  July 1, 2000, we adopted
SFAS No. 133,  which  established  new  accounting  and reporting  standards for
derivative  instruments,  including certain derivative  instruments  embedded in
other contracts and for hedging activities. All derivatives,  whether designated
in  hedging   relationships  or  not,  were  required  to  be  recorded  on  the
consolidated  balance sheet at fair value. If the derivative was designated as a
fair value  hedge,  the changes in the fair value of the  derivative  and of the
hedged item attributable to the hedged risk were recognized in earnings.  If the
derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge, the effective portions of changes
in the fair value of the derivative were recorded in other comprehensive  income
(OCI) and were  recognized in the income  statement when the hedged item affects
earnings.  Ineffective portions of changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges
were recognized in earnings.

                                       19
<PAGE>


          At July 1, 2000 and September 30, 2000, we had derivative  instruments
consisting of mandatorily  redeemable minority interest warrants and an embedded
"mandatory  redemption" option associated with its mandatorily redeemable Series
A preferred stock. We issued these  derivatives as an incentive to the preferred
stockholder to execute the  transaction on March 8, 2000 discussed in Note 12 on
page 29 below. The mandatorily redeemable minority interest warrants were valued
at $867,300,  $50,600 and $2,600 at March 8, 2000,  June 30, 2000 and  September
30, 2000,  respectively.  The mandatory redemption option was valued at $93,000,
$43,000  and $0 at March  8,  2000,  June  30,  2000  and  September  30,  2000,
respectively.  We did not use  derivative  instruments  to manage  exposures  to
foreign currency, securities price, and interest rate risks. Accordingly, we had
no derivatives designated as hedging instruments.


         We recorded a pre- and after-tax  reduction to loss of $817,600 for the
cumulative  effect at July 1, 2000 for the  adoption  of SFAS No.  133.  For the
three months ended September 30, 2000, derivative gains of $133,000 are included
in other income.

          The  mandatorily  redeemable  minority  interest  warrants were valued
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

                                         March 8,     June 30,   September 30,
                                           2000          2000            2000
                                       ------------  ------------ ------------
Risk free interest rate                        6.6%          6.2%          5.9%
Dividend yield                                None          None          None
Volatility                                    84.0%        107.0%        130.0%
Term                                       6 years     5.7 years      5.4 years
Exercise price                          $     5.00   $      5.00   $      5.00


         The  mandatory  redemption  option was valued  using the  Black-Scholes
option pricing model with the following assumptions:

                                            March 8,     June 30,  September 30,
                                              2000         2000           2000
                                        ------------  -----------  -------------
Risk free interest rate                         6.5%          6.4%           --
Dividend yield                                 None          None          None
Volatility                                     82.0%         92.0%           --
Term                                        2 years       2 years            --
Exercise price                          $     20.00   $     20.00  $      20.00

         At September  30, 2000 the  mandatory  redemption  option was valued at
zero because a mandatory redemption event was virtually certain.


Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements -- In November 2000, the Emerging Task
Force ("EITF") issued EITF 00-27,  "Application  of Issue No. 98-5,  "Accounting
for Convertible Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratios
to Certain  Convertible  Instruments".  The adoption of this EITF did not have a
material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.









         On June 30,  2001,  the FASB  approved  the  issuance  of SFAS No. 141,
Business  Combinations and SFAS No. 142,  Goodwill and Other Intangible  Assets.
SFAS No. 141 states that all business combinations should be accounted for using

                                       20
<PAGE>

the  purchase  method  of  accounting;  use  of  pooling-of-interest  method  is
prohibited.  Accounting for the excess of the fair value of net assets over cost
(negative  goodwill),  will be  allocated  to  certain  assets  first  with  any
remaining excess recognized as an extraordinary  gain. SFAS No. 141 is effective
for business combinations  completed after June 30, 2001. SFAS No. 142 addresses
the  accounting for all purchased  intangible  assets but not the accounting for
internally developed intangible assets. Goodwill will no longer be amortized and
will be reviewed for impairment in accordance  with SFAS No. 142.  Goodwill will
be tested  annually and on an interim basis if an event or  circumstance  occurs
between the annual tests that might reduce the fair value of the reporting  unit
below its carrying  value.  SFAS No 142 is effective for fiscal years  beginning
after  December  31,  2001,   with  early  adoption   permitted   under  certain
circumstances.   Goodwill  and  intangible  assets  acquired  in  a  transaction
completed after June 30, 2001 but before SFAS No. 142 is initially  applied will
be accounted  for in  accordance  with SFAS No. 142. ". The adoption of SFAS No.
141 and SFAS No. 142 did not have a material impact on our consolidated  results
of operations or financial position.

            In June  2001,  the  FASB  approved  for  issuance  SFAS  143  Asset
Retirement  Obligations.   SFAS  143  establishes  accounting  requirements  for
retirement obligations associated with tangible long-lived assets, including (1)
the  timing  of  the  liability  recognition,  (2)  initial  measurement  of the
liability,  (3) allocation of asset  retirement cost to expense,  (4) subsequent
measurement of the liability and (5) financial statement  disclosures.  SFAS 143
requires that an asset retirement cost should be capitalized as part of the cost
of the related  long-lived asset and  subsequently  allocated to expense using a
systematic  and  rational  method.  The  statement is  effective  for  financial
statements  issued for fiscal years  beginning after June 15, 2002. The adoption
of SFAS No. 143 did not have a material  impact on our  consolidated  results of
operations or financial position.

            In October 2001, the FASB also approved SFAS 144, Accounting for the
Impairment  or  Disposal  of  Long-Lived  Assets.  SFAS 144  replaces  SFAS 121,
Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived  Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
Be Disposed Of. The new accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of
by sale applies to all long-lived assets, including discontinued operations, and
replaces  the   provisions  of  APB  Opinion  No.  30,   Reporting   Results  of
Operations-Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, for the
disposal of segments of a business. Statement 144 requires that those long-lived
assets be measured  at the lower of  carrying  amount or fair value less cost to
sell, whether reported in continuing  operations or in discontinued  operations.
Therefore,  discontinued operations will no longer be measured at net realizable
value or  include  amounts  for  operating  losses  that have not yet  occurred.
Statement 144 also broadens the reporting of discontinued  operations to include
all components of an entity with operations that can be  distinguished  from the
rest of the entity and that will be  eliminated  from the ongoing  operations of
the  entity in a disposal  transaction.  The  provisions  of  Statement  144 are
effective  for  financial  statements  issued for fiscal years  beginning  after
December 15, 2001 and, generally, are to be applied prospectively.  The adoption
of SFAS No. 144 did not have a material  impact on our  consolidated  results of
operations or financial position.

            In April  2002,  the  FASB  issued  SFAS  145,  "Rescission  of FASB
Statements No. 4, 44, and 64,  Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical
Corrections."  Among other things, this statement rescinds FASB Statement No. 4,
"Reporting  Gains and Losses from  Extinguishment  of Debt" which  required  all
gains and losses from  extinguishment of debt to be aggregated and, if material,
classified  as an  extraordinary  item,net of related  income tax  effect.  As a
result, the criteria in APB Opinion No. 30, "Reporting the Results of Operations
--  Reporting  the  Effects  of  Disposal  of  a  Segment  of  a  Business,  and
Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions," will
now be used to  classify  those  gains and losses.  The  provisions  of SFAS 145
related to the  classification  of debt  extinguishment  are effective for years
beginning  after  May 15,  2002.  The  adoption  of SFAS No.  145 did not have a
material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.

            In July  2002,  the FASB  issued  SFAS  146,  "Accounting  for Costs
Associated with Exit or Disposal  Activities." SFAS 146 provides new guidance on
the  recognition  of costs  associated  with exit or  disposal  activities.  The

                                       21
<PAGE>

standard requires  companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal
activities  when they are incurred  rather than at the date of  commitment to an
exit or disposal plan. SFAS 146 supercedes previous accounting guidance provided
by  the  EITF  Issue  No.  94-3  "Liability  Recognition  for  Certain  Employee
Termination  Benefits  and Other  Costs to Exit an Activity  (including  Certain
Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." EITF Issue No. 94-3 required recognition of
costs at the date of commitment to an exit or disposal  plan.  SFAS 146 is to be
applied  prospectively to exit or disposal  activities  initiated after December
31,  2002.  The  adoption of SFAS No. 146 did not have a material  impact on our
consolidated results of operations or financial position.

            In December 2002, the Financial  Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")
issued  SFAS  148  "Accounting  for  Stock-Based   Compensation--Transition  and
Disclosure--an  amendment of SFAS 123." SFAS 148 provides alternative methods of
transition  for a voluntary  change to the fair value based method of accounting
for stock-based employee  compensation from the intrinsic  value-based method of
accounting  prescribed by APB 25. As allowed by SFAS 123, we elected to continue
to apply the intrinsic  value-based  method of accounting,  and have adopted the
disclosure  requirements  of SFAS 123. We elected not to adopt the provisions of
SFAS 148.

            In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation ("FIN") No. 46,
Consolidation of Variable  Interest  Entities,  which requires variable interest
entities  (commonly  referred  to as SPEs)  to be  consolidated  by the  primary
beneficiary  of the entity if certain  criteria are met. FIN No. 46 is effective
immediately  for all new variable  interest  entities  created or acquired after
January 31, 2003.  The adoption of this statement does not impact our historical
or present financial statements, as we have not created or acquired any variable
interest entities, nor do we expect to in the future.

            In April 2003,  the FASB issued  Statement of  Financial  Accounting
Standard No. 149,  "Amendment  of Statement 133 on  Derivative  Instruments  and
Hedging  Activities"  (SFAS  149).  SFAS  149  amends  and  clarifies  financial
accounting  and  reporting  for  derivative   instruments,   including   certain
derivative instruments embedded in other contracts  (collectively referred to as
derivatives)   and  for  hedging   activities  under  FASB  Statement  No.  133,
"Accounting  for Derivative  Instruments  and Hedging  Activities".  SFAS 149 is
generally  effective for contracts  entered into or modified after June 30, 2003
or hedging  relationships  designated  after June 30, 2003. The adoption of SFAS
No. 149 did not have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations
or financial position.

            In May 2003, the FASB issued Financial  Accounting Standard No. 150,
"Accounting  for Certain  Financial  Instruments  with  Characteristics  of Both
Liabilities  and Equity" (SFAS 150).  SFAS 150  establishes  standards for how a
company   classifies   and   measures   certain   financial   instruments   with
characteristics  of both  liabilities  and equity.  It  requires  that a company
classify a financial  instrument  that is within the scope as a liability (or an
asset in some  circumstances).  SFAS 150 is effective for financial  instruments
entered into or modified  after May 31, 2003,  and otherwise is effective at the
beginning  of the first  interim  period  beginning  after  June 15,  2003.  The
adoption  of SFAS No.  150 did not have a  material  impact on our  consolidated
results of operations or financial position.

            In January,  2004 the  Financial  Accounting  Standards  Board (`the
FASB') issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 132 (revised 2003)
"Employers'  Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement  Benefits",  an
amendment  of FASB  Statements  No.  87,  88,  and 106.  The  Statement  revises
employers'  disclosures  about  pension plans and other  postretirement  benefit
plans.  The  statement  retains the  disclosure  requirements  contained in FASB
Statement No. 132, which it replaces, and requires additional annual disclosures
about the assets,  obligations,  cash flows,  and net  periodic  benefit cost of
defined benefit pension plans and other defined  benefit  postretirement  plans.
Statement No. 132R  requires us to provide  disclosures  in interim  periods for
pensions and other postretirement  benefits. The initial application of SFAS No.
132R will have no impact on our financial statements

            In November 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial  Accounting
Standards  No. 151,  "Inventory  Costs-- an amendment of ARB No. 43,  Chapter 4"
(hereinafter  "SFAS No. 151"). This statement amends the guidance in ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4, "Inventory  Pricing," to clarify the accounting for abnormal  amounts


                                       22
<PAGE>

of  idle  facility  expense,   freight,  handling  costs,  and  wasted  material
(spoilage).  Under some circumstances,  SFAS No. 151 mandates that items such as
idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight, and re-handling costs
be recognized as current-period  charges.  In addition,  this statement requires
that  allocation  of fixed  production  overheads to the costs of  conversion be
based on the normal  capacity of the  production  facilities.  This statement is
effective for inventory  costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June
15,  2005.  We do not  believe  that the  adoption  of SFAS No.  151 will have a
material impact on our financial conditions or results of operation

            In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial  Accounting
Standards No. 152, which amends SFAS Statement No. 66,  "Accounting for Sales of
Real Estate," to reference the financial  accounting and reporting  guidance for
real estate  time-sharing  transactions  that is provided in AICPA  Statement of
Position (SOP) 04-2,  "Accounting  for Real Estate  Time-Sharing  Transactions."
This statement also amends SFAS No. 67, "Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental
Operations  of Real  Estate  Projects,"  to  state  that  the  guidance  for (a)
incidental operations and (b) costs incurred to sell real estate projects,  does
not apply to real estate  time-sharing  transactions.  The  accounting for those
operations  and costs is subject to the guidance in SOP 04-2.  This statement is
effective for financial  statements  for fiscal years  beginning  after June 15,
2005.  We do not believe  that the adoption of SFAS No. 152 will have a material
impact on our financial conditions or results of operation.

            In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial  Accounting
Standards No. 153  (hereinafter  "SFAS No. 153").  This statement  addresses the
measurement of exchanges of nonmonetary  assets. The guidance in APB Opinion No.
29,  "Accounting for Nonmonetary  Transactions,"  is based on the principle that
exchanges of  nonmonetary  assets should be measured  based on the fair value of
the assets exchanged.  The guidance in that opinion,  however,  included certain
exceptions  to that  principle.  SFAS No. 153 amends APB Opinion 29 to eliminate
the  exception  for  nonmonetary  exchanges  of  similar  productive  assets and
replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do
not have commercial  substance.  A nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance
if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a
result of the exchange. This statement is effective for financial statements for
fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for
nonmonetary  asset  exchanges  incurred  during fiscal years beginning after the
date of this  statement  is issued.  We do not believe that the adoption of SFAS
No. 153 will have a material  impact on our  financial  conditions or results of
operation

            In December  2004,  the FASB issued a revision to FASB Statement No.
123,  Accounting for Stock Based  Compensation.  This  Statement  supersedes APB
Opinion  No. 25,  Accounting  for Stock  Issued to  Employees,  and its  related
implementation guidance. This Statement establishes standards for the accounting
for transactions in which an entity  exchanges its equity  instruments for goods
or  services.  It  also  addresses   transactions  in  which  an  entity  incurs
liabilities  in exchange for goods or services  that are based on the fair value
of the  entity's  equity  instruments  or that may be settled by the issuance of
those equity instruments. . We do not believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 123(
R ) will have a  material  impact on our  financial  conditions  or  results  of
operation

            In March 2005,  the FASB  Interpretation  No.47 "FIN 47" was issued,
which  clarifies  certain  terminology  as  used  in  FASB  Statement  No.  143,
"Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations".  In addition it clarifies when an
entity would have sufficient  information to reasonably  estimate the fair value
of an asset retirement obligation.  FIN 47 is effective no later than the end of
fiscal  years  ending  after  December  15,  2005.  Early  adoption of FIN 47 is
encouraged.  We do not believe  that the adoption of FIN 47 will have a material
impact on our financial conditions or results of operation.

            In May 2005,  the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 154, which replaces
APB  Opinion  No.20 and FASB No.  3. This  Statement  provides  guidance  on the
reporting of accounting  changes and error corrections.  It established,  unless
impracticable  retrospective  application as the required method for reporting a

                                       23
<PAGE>

change  in   accounting   principle  in  the  absence  of  explicit   transition
requirements  to a  newly  adopted  accounting  principle.  The  Statement  also
provides guidance when the  retrospective  application for reporting of a change
in accounting  principle is  impracticable.  The reporting of a correction of an
error by restating  previously issued financial  statements is also addressed by
this Statement.  This Statement is effective for financial statements for fiscal
years  beginning after December 15, 2005.  Earlier  application is permitted for
accounting  changes and  corrections  of errors made in fiscal  years  beginning
after the date this Statement is issued.  We do not believe that the adoption of
FASB Statement No. 154 will have a material  impact on our financial  conditions
or results of operation.

            In February  2006,  the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 155, which is
an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140. This Statement; a) permits fair
value  remeasurement  for any  hybrid  financial  instrument  that  contains  an
embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation, b) clarifies which
interest-only strip and principal-only strip are not subject to the requirements
of  Statement  133,  c)  establishes  a  requirement  to evaluate  interests  in
securitized   financial  assets  to  identify  interest  that  are  freestanding
derivatives or that are hybrid  financial  instruments  that contain an embedded
derivative  requiring  bifurcation,  d) clarifies that  concentrations of credit
risk in the  form of  subordination  are not  embedded  derivatives,  e)  amends
Statement  140 to eliminate  the  prohibition  on a  qualifying  special-purpose
entity  from  holding a  derivative  financial  instrument  that  pertains  to a
beneficial  interest other than another derivative  financial  instrument.  This
Statement is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after
September 15, 2006.  Earlier  adoption of this  Statement is permitted as of the
beginning of an entity's fiscal year, provided the entity has not yet issued any
financial statements for that fiscal year. We does not believe that the adoption
of  FASB  Statement  No.  155  will  have a  material  impact  on our  financial
conditions or results of operation

            In March 2006,  the Financial  Accounting  Standards  Board (`FASB')
issued  FASB  Statement  No. 156,  which  amends FASB  Statement  No. 140.  This
Statement  establishes,  among other things,  that accounting for all separately
recognized  servicing  assets and servicing  liabilities.  This Statement amends
Statement 140 to require that all  separately  recognized  servicing  assets and
servicing liabilities be initially measured at fair value, if practicable.  This
Statement  permits,  but  does  not  require,  the  subsequent   measurement  of
separately  recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities at fair value.
An entity that uses  derivative  instruments  to mitigate the risks  inherent in
servicing  assets and  servicing  liabilities  is  required to account for those
derivative instruments at fair value. Under this Statement,  an entity can elect
subsequent  fair value  measurement  to account  for its  separately  recognized
servicing assets and servicing  liabilities.  By electing that option, an entity
may simplify its  accounting  because this Statement  permits  income  statement
recognition of the potential offsetting changes in fair value of those servicing
assets  and  servicing  liabilities  and  derivative  instruments  Is  the  same
accounting  period.  This  Statement is effective for financial  statements  for
fiscal  years  beginning  after  September  15, 2006.  Earlier  adoption of this
Statement is permitted as of the beginning of an entity's fiscal year,  provided
the entity has not yet issued any financial  statements for that fiscal year. We
do not believe that the adoption of FASB  Statement No. 156 will have a material
impact on our financial conditions or results of operation.








Business  Segments -- In June 1997,  the Financial  Accounting  Standards  Board
issued SFAS No. 131,  Disclosures  About  Segments of an Enterprise  and Related
Information  ("SFAS No.  131").  SFAS No. 131 changes  the way public  companies
report  segment  information  in annual  financial  statements and also requires
those  companies to report  selected  segment  information in interim  financial
reports to stockholders.  It also establishes  standards for related disclosures

                                       24
<PAGE>

about products and services,  geographic areas, and major customers. We used the
management  approach  for segment  disclosure,  which  designates  the  internal
organization  that is used by  management  for making  operating  decisions  and
assessing  performance as the source of our reportable  segments.  Following the
cessation  of our  trading  operations  effective  June 30,  2003 we believe our
operations  during fiscal 2005 and 2004  comprised only one segment and as such,
adoption of SFAS No. 131 does not impact the  disclosures  made in our financial
statements.

Note. 7.                   Assets

            Effective  January  1,  2004,  all our  remaining  assets,  with the
exception of certain other  receivables,  were transferred to the trustee of the
assignment for benefit of the Aspeon and CCI creditors at a fair market value of
$496,000.  Our only remaining asset - other  receivables - related to Directors'
and  Officers'  insurance  due  from  our  insurance  company  to be paid to our
attorneys  in respect of legal fees  incurred in respect of the law suit brought
against us by certain of our shareholders

Note 8.           Intangible Assets

GOODWILL

             Excess of cost over net assets of purchased  businesses  (goodwill)
represents the excess of purchase price over the fair value of the net assets of
acquired businesses. For the acquisitions of Posnet, CCI, Aspact, RGB, Jade, RCS
and Monument,  the excess was allocated entirely to goodwill. We determined that
for these acquired companies, there were no other identifiable intangible assets
that would require an allocation of the purchase  price.  Goodwill was stated at
cost and was amortized on a straight-line  basis over periods ranging from three
to 25 years.

OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

            Other intangible  assets include the estimated value associated with
a non-compete  agreement,  workforce and software acquired in the acquisition of
DTI (Note 5, page 15 above).  These items are being amortized on a straight-line
basis over periods ranging from two to ten years.

         At September 30, 2000, we recorded an impairment charge of $17,366,000.
The  provision  included  charges for the write-off of  $16,624,600  of goodwill
associated  with DTI and Monument and the  write-off of the  remaining  $741,400
balance of other intangible assets. At March 31, 2001, we recorded an impairment
charge of  $2,664,900.  The  provision  includes  charges for the  write-off  of
goodwill  associated with RCS and the remaining goodwill of Monument.  A further
write off of $3,300,500  was recorded as at June 30, 2001in  respect of goodwill
and other intangible assets.

Note 9.            Liabilities

         In  December  2003,  we  appointed  attorney  Frank  Blundo Jr. P.C. as
trustee  of an  assignment  for the  benefit  of the  Aspeon  and CCI  creditors
commencing effective January 1, 2004. Effective January 1, 2004, all of Aspeon's
and CCI's assets were transferred to the trustee for the benefit of those Aspeon
and CCI creditors who elected to  participate  in the assignment for the benefit
of Aspeon and CCI creditors.  The assets  transferred had a fair market value of
$496,000 and creditors  totaling $3.7 million  elected to be participate in, and
be bound by the terms of,  the  assignment  for the  benefit  of Aspeon  and CCI
creditors  under which they no longer had any further  claim  against  Aspeon or
CCI.
         Certain Aspeon and CCI  creditors,  totaling in excess of $3.1 million,
elected not to  participate  in the assignment for the benefit of Aspeon and CCI
creditors and remained as outstanding liabilities of Aspeon and CCI.

                                       25
<PAGE>

         As at June  30,  2005  and 2004 our  total  liabilities  also  included
certain liabilities in respect of Javelin Asia and RCS that remained outstanding
following the termination of their operations.

Note 10.                   Accrued Severance Costs

            Included in accrued  expenses as of June 30, 2000 was  $3,900,000 of
severance costs for nine senior  management  personnel  terminated in June 2000.
Such costs include payroll and related expenses,  health benefits and $2,500,000
associated  with the settlement of future  contingent  payments with the selling
shareholder of RCS. The termination agreements provided for the extension of the
exercise period to twenty-four months for previously granted stock options.  The
fair market value of the  underlying  common stock on the date the stock options
were modified was less than the exercise price; accordingly, there was no impact
to the  consolidated  statements  of  operations.  In addition,  we entered into
consulting agreements with five of the terminated employees, in which a total of
200,000 of our stock  options were granted with vesting  periods of  twenty-four
months.  The  impact  of  these  stock  options  to the  consolidated  financial
statements was not material.

            As of June 30, 2001, there are no remaining accrued costs associated
with these termination agreements.

            As of March 31, 2001,  the  remaining  balance of accrued  severance
costs  included  in the  accrued  expenses  is  $354,000  which  represents  the
remaining  accrued costs  incurred  during the quarter ended  December 31, 2000.
Such costs  include  payroll,  related  expenses  and health  benefits  for five
terminations.  Four of the termination  agreements provided for the extension of
the exercise  period to ninety days for previously  granted stock  options.  The
fifth termination agreement provided for the extension of the exercise period to
twenty-four months for previously  granted stock options.  The fair market value
of the  underlying  common stock on the date the stock options were modified for
all  agreements  was less than the  exercise  price;  accordingly,  there was no
impact to the consolidated statements of operations.

Note. 11          Lines of Credit, Debt & Notes Payable

            In June 1998, we and our subsidiaries  obtained a credit facility of
$7,500,000 from an unrelated financial institution.  The credit facility was for
three  years to expire in June 2001 and  consisted  of a line of credit of up to
$6,000,000 and a term loan of $1,500,000.  The credit facility contained a 0.50%
per annum unused line of credit fee, which was based on the  difference  between
the borrowing capacity and outstanding balance.

            Borrowings under the term loan were  collateralized by substantially
all of our  assets,  bore  interest  at 13.65% per annum and were  repayable  at
$25,000 per month with all unpaid  principal  and interest due in June 2001.  At
June 30, 2000, borrowings  outstanding under the term loan amounted to $900,000.
We were not  permitted to pay cash  dividends to common  stockholders  under the
terms  of the  credit  facility  without  approval  of the  unrelated  financial
institution.

            Under the terms of the credit facility,  we were permitted to borrow
up to 80% of  eligible  accounts  receivable  (as  defined)  and 50% of eligible
inventory (as defined) with monthly interest  payments based upon the prime rate
of a  national  financial  institution  plus 1.75%  (9.5% as of June 30,  2000).
Borrowings under the line of credit were  collateralized by substantially all of
our assets. At June 30, 2000, borrowings  outstanding under the line amounted to
$2,497,000.

            The credit facility contained certain  restrictive monthly financial
and  non-financial  covenants  (e.g.,  limitation  on capital  expenditures  and
indebtedness).  We were required to maintain a stated current ratio,  net worth,
senior debt service  coverage ratio and total debt service  coverage  ratio.  At
June 30, 2000, we were in default of certain non-financial covenants. In October

                                       26
<PAGE>

2000,  we obtained a waiver on all defaults  through  June 30, 2000  pursuant to
certain  terms and  conditions  including  accelerating  term  loan  repayments,
accruing  interest on the term loan at the default  rate of 11.5%,  and limiting
borrowings to approximately $3,538,000.

         At September 30, 2000, we had borrowings outstanding under our domestic
line of credit  facility  and term loan  amounting  to  $2,714,900  and $825,000
respectively.

         The term loan was repaid in full in December  2000.  At that time,  the
revolving line of credit facility was limited to aggregate borrowings,  which at
no time was to exceed $3,538,000
          In November 2000, additional events of default occurred under the loan
agreement.  In March  2001,  we  obtained  from the  lender a  forbearance  from
exercising  its rights and remedies in terms of the credit  facility to allow us
to obtain  financing  sufficient  to fully repay our  obligations.  Terms of the
forbearance agreement provided aggregate outstanding principal be limited to the
lesser of $1,375,000 less any loan reserves or the sum of:
         i) an amount equal to 80% of the our net eligible receivables; plus

         ii) an amount not to exceed the lesser of:

         A) 50% of the value of our eligible inventory,  calculated at the lower
         of cost or market value and determined on the FIFO basis; or

         B) $675,000  provided  that,  commencing on March 19, 2001,  and on the
         first day of each week  thereafter  such  amount  shall be  reduced  by
         $50,000 per week; less

         iii) any Loan Reserves.

         Interest on the outstanding obligations accrued at the default interest
rate of 13.25% per annum as of September 30, 2000.

         In accordance with the March 2001 forbearance agreement,  the revolving
line of credit facility  principal  balance reduced on a weekly  scheduled basis
until  expiration of the loan  agreement on June 8, 2001.  On May 14, 2001,  the
line of credit facility was repaid in full.

         Jade had a line of credit facility of approximately  $1,800,000 from an
unrelated  financial  institution.  Borrowings  under  the line of  credit  were
collateralized  by all of the assets of Jade and bore  interest at the U.K. Base
rate plus 2% (7.7% at September  30, 2000).  The credit  facility was renewed in
October  2000  through  August  2001  and was  subsequently  renewed  again.  At
September  30,  2000,  borrowings  under  the  line  amounted  to  approximately
$600,000.  Availability  under  the line at  September  30,  2000  totaled  $1.2
million. Borrowings under the line were restricted to the operations of Jade and
were  not to be used to  support  our  other  operations.  At  March  31,  2001,
borrowings  under the line a borrowings under the line amounted to approximately
$656,700. Availability under the line at March 31, 2001 totaled $1.1 million. We
did not guarantee  this line of credit which ceased to be a liability of ours on
the sale of RGB in March 2002.




          In December 2000, Javelin Europe obtained a line of credit facility of
approximately  $1,000,000  collateralized by substantially all of its assets and
bore  interest at 1.75% over the lenders  Base Rate.  This  facility  expired in
August 2001 at which date it was  further  extended.  Borrowings  under the line

                                       27
<PAGE>

were  restricted to the  operations  of Javelin  Europe and could not be used to
support our other  operations.  At March 31, 2001,  borrowings  under the line a
borrowings under the line amounted to approximately $297,200. Availability under
the line at March 31, 2001 totaled $327,700  million.  We did not guarantee this
line of credit which  ceased to be a liability  ours on the sale of RGB in March
2002.

         In July,  2001,  Javelin  Australia  entered into a factoring  facility
amounting  to  approximately  $500,000  or a lesser  amount  based  on  eligible
receivables.  The facility was cancelable on 30 days notice by either party. The
agreement provided for a discount rate of 1.75% + the bank's published overdraft
index rate, and a factoring service fee of 0.50%. Borrowings under the line were
restricted  to the  operations  of  Javelin  Australia  and could not be used to
support other our operations. We provided a guarantee for this facility that was
to be released on the sale of Javelin  Australia  in January 2003 and in respect
of which we were indemnified by the purchaser of Javelin Australia.

         On September 12, 2002 we entered into a Secured Convertible  Promissory
Note Purchase  Agreement with three  individuals.  Under that  agreement,  those
three individuals, who were Richard Stack, one of our directors, Kenneth Kadlec,
our Vice President of Engineering,  and Horace Hertz, subsequently a director of
ours, loaned to us $125,000,  $50,000 and $75,000,  respectively.  Each of those
loans  was  represented  by a  Secured  Convertible  Promissory  Note,  and bore
interest  at the rate of ten  percent  per annum.  Interest on the loans was due
monthly,  and the principal amount of the loans was due on the first anniversary
of the loans.  Repayment  of the loans was  secured by a  security  interest  in
substantially  all of  our  assets.  The  principal  amount  of  the  loans  was
convertible at any time at the election of the lenders into shares of our common
stock  at a  conversion  price  of  $0.08  per  share.  In  connection  with the
consummation of these loans,  Robert Nichols and Edward Brooks resigned from our
Board of  Directors,  and Horace  Hertz was  elected to our Board of  Directors.
These  Secured  Convertible  Promissory  Notes were repaid in full in  September
2003.

            As at March 31,  2006 the balance of notes  payable  included a note
payable of $128,000 to an individual who had previously sold his business to us.
We had  renegotiated the terms of the deferred earnout due to him on the sale of
his  business to us such that the note  payable  represented  the balance due to
him. We were in default in repayment of the note payable as at March 31, 2006.

            The  remainder of the balance of notes  payable as at March 31, 2006
represents  a loan to us of  $169,000  by David J Cutler,  our  Chief  Executive
Officer and one of our directors.  The loan, bearing interest at 8%, was made to
meet our ongoing operating expenses and fund the costs of bringing our financial
statements and SEC reporting up to date. Effective May 31, 2006, $14,243 of this
debt was converted into 10,536,775 shares of our common stock on the basis of an
independent  third  party  valuation  and the  approval  of the  majority of our
independent  directors.  Following the issue of these shares of our common stock
Mr.  Cutler owned 52.7% of our total  authorized  and issued  share  capital and
still had a loan  outstanding to us of approximately  $178,000.  There can be no
assurance that Mr. Cutler will provide us with further funding in the future.

Note. 12          Mandatorily Redeemable Series A Preferred Stock
         In March 2000,  we  completed a private  placement  in which we sold an
aggregate of 10,000 shares of Series A Convertible  Exchangeable Preferred Stock
(the "Preferred Stock"), a warrant to acquire 583,334 shares of our common stock
at an  initial  exercise  price of $17.00  per share  and a warrant  to  acquire
1,250,000 shares of common stock of our wholly owned subsidiary company,  Aspeon
Solutions,  at an exercise price of $5.00 per share.  Proceeds to us amounted to
$9,568,400, net of $431,600 in issuance costs.



         The  net  proceeds  from  the  issuance  of the  Preferred  Stock  were
allocated based on the relative fair values of each equity  instrument  using an
independent valuation as follows:


                                       28
<PAGE>


Preferred Stock                                          $        5,274,500
Warrants, Aspeon                                                  3,426,600
Warrants, Aspeon Solutions                                          867,300
                                                         ------------------


 Total net proceeds                                      $        9,568,400
                                                         ------------------


         The Preferred Stock  conversion price was less than the market value of
our common stock on the date of issuance;  accordingly, we recorded a beneficial
conversion  feature equal to the difference between the conversion price and the
fair value of the common  stock,  multiplied  by the number of shares into which
the Preferred Stock was convertible  (intrinsic  value). The resultant value was
limited to the amount  allocated to the Preferred  Stock of  $5,274,500  and was
charged to retained  earnings,  to the extent available,  and paid in capital on
the issuance date, and increased the net loss available to common  stockholders.
The  Preferred  Stock  discount  that  resulted  from the  allocation of the net
proceeds to the other equity  instruments  issued was accreted  over the minimum
period from the date of issuance to the date on which the Preferred  Stock could
first be redeemed at our  initiative  (March  2002),  and increased the net loss
available to common  stockholders  by  $2,462,400  for the three and nine months
ended March 31, 2001.

         The holder of the Preferred Stock  ("Preferred  Stockholders")  had the
following  rights: i) the right of first offer for the subsequent sale of equity
securities by us through March 2001, ii) the right to exchange  Preferred  Stock
for equity  securities  subsequently  issued by us, through September 2001, iii)
the option to exchange the Preferred  Stock for shares of the preferred stock of
Aspeon Solutions  following an initial public offering of that company and based
on the  trading  volume of the  company's  common  stock,  as  defined,  and iv)
registration  rights for the shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion
of the Preferred Stock.

         The  Preferred  Stock also  contained  the  following  preferences:  i)
cumulative  dividends  at an annual  rate of 6%,  payable  quarterly  in cash or
common  stock at the our  option  commencing  in  April  2000,  ii)  liquidation
preference  equal to the original  issuance  price plus unpaid  dividends,  iii)
conversion into common stock at any time after March 2000 at a conversion  price
equal to the lower of (a) $16.00 or (b) the average of the three lowest  closing
bid prices of our common stock during the 10 day period prior to the conversion,
in either case  subject to a maximum  number of shares of common stock which may
be issued upon conversion of the Preferred  Stock,  which maximum  initially was
set at 1,250,000  shares and which is subject to adjustments,  iv) redemption of
the Preferred  Stock by us in March 2002 at the original  issuance price ($1,000
per share) plus unpaid dividends,  or at our option if certain conditions remain
satisfied, as defined, in shares of common stock, and v) mandatory redemption if
certain events occur, as defined,  at a redemption price equal to the greater of
(a) the aggregate value of the Preferred Stock being redeemed  multiplied by one
hundred and twenty-five  percent (125%) and (b) an amount determined by dividing
the aggregate  value of the Preferred  Shares being  redeemed by the  conversion
price in effect on the mandatory  redemption  date and multiplying the resulting
quotient by the average closing trade price for the common stock on the five (5)
trading days immediately  preceding (but not including) the mandatory redemption
date.

         In August  2000,  the  holder  of 150  shares  of our  Preferred  Stock
converted  such  shares into  53,054  shares of our common  stock at a per share
conversion  price of  $2.58.The  issuance  of the common  stock was exempt  from
registration pursuant to Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933.

         During the nine  months  ended  March 31,  2001,  we paid  $553,400  in
dividends to the  Preferred  Stockholder.  As of March 31, 2001,  we had accrued
dividends  of $40,000  that have been  recorded as an increase to the  Preferred
Stock carrying value.

         The components of the accretion of the mandatory  redeemable  preferred
stock included in the statements of stockholders'  equity for the three and nine
months ended March 31, 2001 were as follows:

                                       29
<PAGE>

                                               Three months      Nine months
                                                   Ended             Ended
                                             ----------------  -----------------
                                             March 31, 2001       March 31, 2001

Discount accretion to stated face value      $ --              $  4,138,400
Premium on mandatory redemption accretion      --                 2,462,400
Dividend recordation                            147,800           443,500
                                             ----------------  -----------------
                                             $  147,800        $  7,044,300
                                             ================  =================






         In October  2000, a notice of default was received  from the  Preferred
Stockholders  due to our failure to timely file our Form 10-K and the suspension
of trading of our common stock by Nasdaq.  In accordance  with the provisions of
certain  agreements  related to the Preferred  Stock we were required to pay the
lesser of 1.5% or the  highest  rate  allowed by  applicable  law, of the stated
value of the Preferred  Stock  ($9,850,000)  for each thirty calendar day period
during  which   defaults   remain  in  connection   with  the  Preferred   Stock
(approximately  $147,800 per month). As a result of the defaults not being cured
within ten days of the default  notice,  the  conversion  price of the Preferred
Stock was reduced and the Preferred  Stockholder  had the right to require us to
redeem the Preferred Stock.


         For the three and nine month  period  ended  March 31,  2001 we accrued
default  interest of $390,900  and  $914,000,  respectively,  as  calculated  in
accordance  with the provisions of the preferred  stock agreement as an increase
to the Preferred Stock carrying value.

         In January 2001, the Preferred  Stockholders served us with a mandatory
redemption  notice in accordance with the terms of the Preferred Stock since our
common stock was no longer listed on the Nasdaq  National Market or the New York
Stock Exchange.  We were not in a position to comply with the redemption  demand
and entered into  negotiations  with the holder of the Preferred  Stock to alter
the terms of the agreement.










         The terms of the  Preferred  Stock  provide  that until the  redemption
price was paid, the redemption  price would earn interest at a rate equal to the
lower of 24% per annum or the highest rate permitted by applicable law. At March
31,  2001,  the  approximate  redemption  value  for  the  Preferred  Stock  was
$13,267,400,  including interest at the rate of 24% per annum. The holder of the
Preferred  Stock  had the  right to elect by  delivering  written  notice  to us
("Election  Notice") to regain its rights as a holder of the Preferred Stock. If
the holder of the Preferred Stock had delivered us an Election Notice,  then the
conversion  price for the Preferred Stock would have been reduced by 1% for each

                                       30
<PAGE>

day after February 9, 2001 that we failed to pay the redemption price, until the
day that the Election  Notice was delivered to us;  provided that the conversion
price could not be reduced by more than 50%. The Preferred  Stockholder  elected
not to deliver to us an Election Notice, and therefore,  the conversion price in
effect on the date of  conversion of the Preferred  Stock,  if converted,  would
have been reduced by 50%. The terms of the  Preferred  Stock  provided  that the
maximum  number of shares of common  stock  which  could have be issued upon the
conversion of the Preferred Stock initially was set at 1,250,000 shares (subject
to  certain  adjustments);  provided  that such  amount  would be  increased  in
proportion to any decrease in the conversion  price  resulting from a redemption
default. Accordingly, as a result of the redemption default, the 1,250,000 share
limitation  was  increased to 1,875,000  shares.  Shares of Preferred  Stock not
converted  into shares of common stock prior to the March 2002  maturity date of
the  Preferred  Stock would have been  required to be redeemed on such  maturity
date.

         On May 1, 2002, we signed an agreement with the Preferred  Stockholders
under which, in return for a cash payment of $447,500 by us (a) we were released
from all  liabilities  relating  to the our  outstanding  Series  A  Convertible
Exchangeable  Preferred Stock and the documents under which those securities had
been  issued  and  were  outstanding;  (b)  all  of  our  outstanding  Series  A
Convertible   Exchangeable  Preferred  Stock  were  cancelled;   (c)  a  Warrant
previously  issued by us entitling the holder thereof to purchase 583,334 shares
of our common stock were cancelled;  and (d) a Warrant  previously issued by our
subsidiary,  Aspeon  Solutions,  Inc.,  entitling the holder thereof to purchase
1,250,000 shares of the common stock of Aspeon Solutions was cancelled.

         We believe that the settlement had a net positive effect on our balance
sheet of approximately $19 million.

Note. 13 Stockholders' Equity

Common Stock

         In August 2000,  150 shares of Preferred  Stock plus accrued and unpaid
dividends  were  converted  into  53,064  shares of our common  stock  valued at
$94,700.

         On April 22, 2005,  our sole  director,  David J Cutler entered into an
agreement  with Frank G Blundo,  Jr.  P.C.,  trustee of the  assignment  for the
benefit of Aspeon and CCI creditors,  subject to due diligence,  to invest up to
$50,000  cash in us for the benefit of our  creditors  in return for a number of
shares of our common stock to be determined. Following the completion of the due
diligence process during the three months ended December 31, 2005, it was agreed
with Frank G Blundo,  Jr.  P.C.,  trustee of the  assignment  for the benefit of
Aspeon and CCI  creditors,  that Mr.  Cutler would invest  $20,000 in us for the
benefit  of Aspeon  and CCI  creditors  in return  for a number of shares of our
common  stock to be  determined.  Accordingly  during  the  three  months  ended
December 31, 2005  $20,000  which had been placed in escrow with Frank G Blundo,
Jr. P.C. by Mr. Cutler was released for the benefit of Aspeon and CCI creditors.
On May 31, 2006, based on an independent third party valuation,  the majority of
our independent  directors approved the issue of 10,536,775 shares of our common
stock to Mr.  Cutler for the  conversion  of  $14,243  of his debt into  equity.
Following  the issue of these shares of our common stock Mr.  Cutler owned 52.7%
of  our  total  authorized  and  issued  share  capital  and  still  had a  loan
outstanding to us of approximately $178,000.

Stock Options

         In August  1996,  we  adopted a stock  incentive  award plan (the "1996
Plan")  under  which  the  Board of  Directors  (the  "Board"),  or a  committee
appointed for such purpose, was authorized to grant options, restricted stock or
other stock-based compensation to the directors, officers, eligible employees or
consultants to acquire up to an aggregate of 300,000 shares of our common stock.

                                       31
<PAGE>

Options issued under the Plan generally vested over a 3-year period based on the
following  schedule:  40% after year one, 30% after year two, and 30% at the end
of year three. All options expired ten years from the date of grant.

            In  December  1997,  our  stockholders   approved  our  1997  Equity
Incentive Plan (the "1997 Plan") under which the Board, or a committee appointed
for such purpose,  was  authorized to grant options,  restricted  stock or other
stock-based  compensation  to the  directors,  officers,  eligible  employees or
consultants  to acquire up to an  aggregate  of  2,100,000  shares of our common
stock.  Options issued under the 1997 Plan generally  vested 20% per year over a
5-year period. All options expired ten years from the date of grant.

            In April 1999, the Board approved our 1999 Non-Officer  Stock Option
Plan (the "1999 Plan") under which the Board, or a committee  appointed for such
purpose, was authorized to grant non-statutory  options to eligible employees or
consultants  who were not officers or members of the Board,  to acquire up to an
aggregate of 3,000,000  shares of our common  stock.  Options  granted under the
1999  Plan  vested  25%  per  year  over  a  4-year  period,  in  equal  monthly
installments  over thirty-six  months or 100% upon grant  issuance.  All options
expired ten years from the date of grant.

            As at June 30, 2000 we had a total of 2,336,967 options  outstanding
with  exercise  prices  between  $3.78 and $8.04 per share,  a weighted  average
exercise price of $7.92 and an average  remaining life of 5.8 years.  656,258 of
these options had vested at an average exercise price of $7.62.

            During the fiscal year June 30, 2001,  2,107,500  stock options were
issued at an exercise price of $4.00.

            During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002,  1,655,000 stock options
were  issued at an  exercise  price of $0.35 and 600,000  with  exercise  prices
ranging from $0.50 to $1.50.

            During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003,  2,000,000 stock options
were issued at an exercise  price of $0.07 and 600,000 with an exercise price of
$0.06.

            During the fiscal  years  ended June 30,  2004 and June 30 2005,  no
stock options were issued.

            Subsequent to June 30, 2000, no stock options were exercised







            During the fiscal  years ended June 20, 2001 to June 30,  2003,  all
outstanding  stock options were  cancelled  except for the following  which were
outstanding during the year ended June 30 2004:


                                       32
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                              YEAR ENDED
                                                              JUNE 30, 2004
                                                              ------------------------------------------
                                                                                      WEIGHTED
                                                                                      AVERAGE
                                                                OPTIONS             EXERCISE PRICE
<S>                                                           <C>                 <C>
FOR OPTIONS GRANTED AT FAIR MARKET
  VALUE ON THE DATE OF GRANT:
Options outstanding beginning of
period................                                           850,000            $0.063
  Granted..........................                                   --                --
  Exercised........................                                   --                --
  Canceled.........................                                   --                --
                                                               -----------         --------
Options outstanding................                              850,000            $0.063
                                                               ===========         ========
Options exercisable................                              616,667            $0.063
                                                               ===========         ========
</TABLE>

            All the above  options were  cancelled  during the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2005 with the resignation of Richard P Stack in April 2005.

Warrants

            In  connection  with our  initial  public  offering,  we issued  the
representatives  of the  underwriters a warrant to purchase 85,000 shares of our
common stock at $6.25 per share.  During the year ended June 30, 1998,  warrants
to purchase  65,570 shares of our common stock were exchanged into 36,362 shares
of common  stock  through a  cashless  exercise.  During the year ended June 30,
1999, warrants to purchase 19,430 shares of our common stock were exchanged into
10,790 shares of common stock through a cashless  exercise.  As of June 30, 1999
there were no warrants outstanding.

            In  connection  with the credit  facility  described  in Note 11, we
issued  warrants to  purchase  100,000  shares of its common  stock at $9.00 per
share to the financial institution and warrants to purchase 35,000 shares of its
common stock at prices ranging from $9.36 to $12.65 to its independent financial
advisors. The fair value of these warrants was estimated at $621,900 at the date
of grant using a  Black-Scholes  pricing  model with the  assumptions  described
above. The fair value of the warrants was reflected as deferred  financing costs
included  in other  assets and in  additional  paid in  capital  in our  balance
sheets. As of June 30, 2000,  deferred financing costs of $312,900 were included
in other assets. The warrants expired unexercised in June 2003.

            In March  2000,  we issued  warrants a warrant  to  acquire  583,334
shares of our common stock at an initial  exercise price of $17.00 per share and
a warrant  to  acquire  1,250,000  shares of common  stock of our  wholly  owned
subsidiary,  Aspeon Solutions,  Inc., at an exercise price of $5.00 per share in
connection  with its issuance of our  Preferred  Stock (Note 12). On May 1, 2002
both of these warrants were  cancelled as part of our negotiated  settlements of
the liabilities outstanding with our Preferred Shareholders.

            Consequently  as at March 31, 2006 no warrants were  outstanding and
none have been issued subsequently.

Note. 14 Treasury Stock

         In connection  with the sale of certain  assets  related to the sale of
DTI in March 2001,  200,000  shares of common  stock,  valued at  $60,000,  were
cancelled

                                       33
<PAGE>

Note. 15 Related Party Transactions

            On August 10, 1999, we loaned $116,000 to Edmund Brooks,  one of our
directors and the Chief Executive Officer of our Javelin Systems  division.  The
loan bore  interest at an annual rate of 6% per annum.  The loan was made to Mr.
Brooks for personal  reasons.  The loan was secured by a pledge of 39,000 shares
of common stock of AFC Enterprises, Inc. owned by Mr. Brooks. The loan principal
and interest  was repaid in December  2001 subject to a discount of 8% in return
for repayment of the loan prior to its due date of August 2002.

            On September 25, 1999, we loaned $80,000 to Andrew F. Puzder, one of
our  directors.  The loan bore  interest at an annual rate of 6% per annum.  The
loan was made to Mr.  Puzder for  personal  reasons.  The loan was  secured by a
pledge of Mr. Puzder's option to purchase 30,000 shares of our common stock. The
largest amount outstanding under this loan was approximately  $85,300.  The loan
principal and interest was repaid in full in November 2000.

            In April 2000,  we loaned  $300,000 to Richard P. Stack,  one of our
directors and our Chief Executive  Officer.  The loan bore interest at an annual
rate of 6.6% per annum. The loan was made to Mr. Stack for personal reasons. The
loan principal and interest was repaid in full in September 2000.

            In August 2000, the company loaned $400,000 to Richard P. Stack, one
of our directors and our Chief Executive  Officer.  The loan bore interest at an
annual  rate of 6.6% per  annum.  The loan was made to Mr.  Stack  for  personal
reasons. The loan principal and interest was repaid in full in September 2000.

         In August  2000,  we executed a sale  agreement  with the then  current
director of Aspact (the  "Purchaser").  The initial  purchase price of $350,000,
which is  reflected  in other  assets in the  consolidated  balance  sheet,  was
payable to the us in monthly  installments  of $14,600  commencing in July 2001.
Consequently,  a loss on sale of  approximately  $229,000 was recognized for the
fiscal  year ended June 30,  2001.  In the event the  Purchaser  consummated  an
initial  public  offering or disposed  of all or  substantially  all of Aspact's
common stock,  the Purchaser  would be required to pay: a) the unpaid balance of
the  initial  consideration  and b) 50% of the net  proceeds  received  from the
initial  public  offering  less the  amount  paid  under a), in an amount not to
exceed  $200,000.   Concurrent  with  the  sale  agreement,  the  Purchaser  was
terminated as an employee of ours.

         In February  2001,  our  subsidiary,  RGB,  sold its  interest in Teneo
Limited to employees of Teneo for the  consideration of a $350,000 note which is
reflected in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet. Consequently a gain
on sale of $432,000 was recognized during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001.

         On March 1, 2001, we completed the sale of the consulting contracts and
certain of the fixed assets of our Dynamic  Technologies,  Inc. (DTI) subsidiary
to a company controlled by DTI's former owners and certain shareholders of ours,
for a purchase  price of  $900,000  and the return for  cancellation  of 200,000
shares  of our  Common  Stock  valued at  $60,000.  With the  completion  of the
transfer  of its help desk  business  to a third  party on April 27,  2001,  the
business  activities of DTI ceased.  A gain on the sale of the net assets of DTI
totaling $820,900 was recognized during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001.

         On September 12, 2002 we entered into a Secured Convertible  Promissory
Note Purchase  Agreement with three  individuals.  Under that  agreement,  those
three individuals, who were Richard Stack, one of our directors, Kenneth Kadlec,
our Vice  President of  Engineering,  and Horace  Hertz,  loaned to us $125,000,
$50,000 and  $75,000,  respectively.  Each of those loans was  represented  by a
Secured  Convertible  Promissory  Note,  and  bore  interest  at the rate of ten
percent per annum.  Interest  on the loans was due  monthly,  and the  principal
amount of the loans was due on the first anniversary of the loans.  Repayment of

                                       34
<PAGE>

the loans was secured by a security interest in substantially all of our assets.
The principal amount of the loans was convertible at any time at the election of
the lenders into shares of our common  stock at a conversion  price of $0.08 per
share.  In connection with the  consummation of these loans,  Robert Nichols and
Edward Brooks resigned from our Board of Directors, and Horace Hertz was elected
to our Board of  Directors.  These  Secured  Convertible  Promissory  Notes were
repaid in full in September 2003.

         On April 22, 2005,  our sole  director,  David J Cutler entered into an
agreement  with Frank G Blundo,  Jr.  P.C.,  trustee of the  assignment  for the
benefit of Aspeon and CCI creditors,  subject to due diligence,  to invest up to
$50,000  cash in us for the benefit of our  creditors  in return for a number of
shares of our common stock to be determined. Following the completion of the due
diligence process during the three months ended December 31, 2005, it was agreed
with Frank G Blundo,  Jr.  P.C.,  trustee of the  assignment  for the benefit of
Aspeon and CCI  creditors,  that Mr.  Cutler would invest  $20,000 in us for the
benefit  of Aspeon  and CCI  creditors  in return  for a number of shares of our
common  stock to be  determined.  Accordingly  during  the  three  months  ended
December 31, 2005  $20,000  which had been placed in escrow with Frank G Blundo,
Jr. P.C. by Mr. Cutler was released for the benefit of Aspeon and CCI creditors.
On May 31, 2006, based on an independent third party valuation,  the majority of
our independent  directors approved the issue of 10,536,775 shares of our common
stock to Mr.  Cutler for the  conversion  of  $14,243  of his debt into  equity.
Following  the issue of these shares of our common stock Mr.  Cutler owned 52.7%
of  our  total  authorized  and  issued  share  capital  and  still  had a  loan
outstanding to us of approximately $178,000.

         During  the  fiscal  years  ended  June 30,  2006 and 2005,  one of our
directors,  David J Cutler,  advanced to us $115,000 and $88,000 respectively by
way of loan,  bearing interest at 8%, to meet our ongoing operating expenses and
fund the costs of bringing  our  financial  statements  and SEC  reporting up to
date. Effective May 31, 2006 $14,000 of this debt was converted to equity. Since
June 30, 2006 Mr. Cutler has continued to make further  advances to us by way of
loan to meet our ongoing  operating  expenses and fund the costs of bringing our
financial  statements  and SEC  reporting  up to date as  required.  There is no
assurance  that Mr. Cutler will  continue to provide us with further  funding in
the future

Note.16  Segment Reporting

            Our  reportable  segments are  strategic  business  units that offer
different  products  and  services.  They are managed  separately  because  each
business requires different  technology and marketing  strategies.  The segments
and a description of their businesses follows:

            The Research and Development segment provides all research and devel
-opment activities for the other business segments

            The POS  Products  segment  designs,  manufactures  and markets open
system touchscreen  point-of-sale  (POS) network-ready  hardware systems.  These
systems are sold on a  stand-alone  basis or integrated as part of an end-to-end
solution.

            The  Solutions   Services   segment   provides  retail   foodservice
technology  solutions  and services  that enable  restaurants  and  retailers to
capture,  analyze,  disseminate and use  information  throughout the enterprise,
from the  point-of-sale  (POS) cash  register  terminal to the back office to an
organization's headquarters.

            The ASP Services segment provides  pre-integrated,  mission-critical
business  application services customized to meet industry specific needs of the
foodservice and retail industry.

            The  accounting  policies  of the  segments  are the  same as  those
described  in the "Summary of  Significant  Accounting  Policies."  Segment data
includes intersegment revenues. We do not allocate  corporate-headquarters costs
or research and  development  costs to the  operating  segments.  Resources  for
research  and  development  are  allocated  based on budgets.  We  evaluate  the
performance  of our segments and allocate  resources to them based on net income
(loss).

                                       35
<PAGE>

            Information  about our  reportable  segments  for the three and nine
months ended March 31 follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                           POS             SOLUTION            ASP
                                         PRODUCTS          SERVICES         SERVICES            TOTAL
                                     --------------       -----------      -----------        -----------
<S>                                  <C>              <C>              <C>                 <C>

Three months ended March 31:

2002
Revenues......................        $  3,631,600     $  4,902,000     $     393,900         $  8,927,500
Net income (loss).............          (1,816,100)        (188,900)         (161,400)          (2,166,400)
Total assets..................        $  8,171,200     $  3,435,200     $   1,337,600         $ 12,944,000

2001
Revenues......................        $  5,641,000     $  8,528,200       $ 1,462,300         $ 15,631,500
Net income (loss).............          (3,495,300)        (305,300)       (4,122,900)          (7,923,500)
Total assets..................         $13,159,800     $ 25,704,000      $  4,687,600         $ 43,551,400

Nine months ended March 31:

2002
Revenues......................         $13,145,200     $ 18,194,900     $   1,654,700         $ 32,994,800
Net income (loss).............          (6,468,800)         (61,500)         (517,300)          (7,047,600)
Total assets..................        $  8,171,200     $  3,435,200     $   1,337,600         $ 12,944,000


2001
Revenues......................         $23,777,100      $24,714,700      $  6,731,500         $ 55,223,300
Net income (loss).............         (10,344,900)      (1,821,000)      (26,649,600)         (38,815,500)
Total assets..................         $13,159,800      $25,704,000      $  4,687,600         $ 43,551,400
</TABLE>






A reconciliation of total segment sales to total consolidated revenues and total
segment net income (loss) to total  consolidated net income (loss) for the three
and nine months ended March 31 is as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                        Three Months Ended                    Nine Months Ended
                                                             March 31,                              March 31,
                                                        2002            2001               2002            2001
                                                     -----------     ------------        ------------     ------------
<S>                                               <C>             <C>                <C>                 <C>
REVENUES:
Total segment revenues........................    $  8,927,500     $ 15,631,500       $ 32,994,800        $ 55,223,300
Elimination of inter-segment revenues.........      (2,248,900)        (931,300)        (5,147,600)         (4,750,100)
                                                  --------------  ----------------   --------------      --------------

                                       36
<PAGE>

  Consolidated revenues.......................     $ 6,678,600      $14,700,200       $ 27,847,200        $ 50,473,200
                                                  ==============  ================   ==============      ==============
NET (LOSS):
Total segment net (loss)......................     $(2,166,400)    $ (7,923,500)      $ (7,047,600)       $(38,815,500)
 Elimination of inter-segment gross
 (Profit) / Loss net of income taxes..........         188,200         (141,600)          (255,100)           (612,300)
 Elimination of non-segment expenses,
net of taxes..................................      (7,401,000)              --         (7,401,000)                 --
                                                  --------------  ----------------   --------------      --------------
  Consolidated net (loss)......................    $(9,379,200)   $  (7,781,900)       $(5,324,500)       $(39,427,800)
                                                  ==============  ================   ==============      ==============
</TABLE>

Specified  items  included in segment (loss) for the three and nine months ended
March 31:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                  POS                 SOLUTION               ASP
                                               PRODUCTS               SERVICES            SERVICES               TOTAL
                                           ------------------      --------------      --------------        --------------
<S>                                       <C>                 <C>                  <C>                        <C>
Three months ended March 31

2002

Interest expense..............            $   (599,100)       $         --         $      (10,600)            $   (609,700)
Interest income...............                     800               1,000                     --                    1,800
Depreciation and amortization
  expense.....................                (147,400)            (49,700)              (173,900)                (370,800)
Income tax (expense) /
  benefit...................                      --                    --                     --                       --
Expenditures for additions to
  long-lived assets...........            $     79,500        $     62,800         $        9,000             $    151,300

2001

Interest expense..............            $   (640,400)       $    (42,200)        $      (49,700)            $   (732,300)
Interest income...............                   8,400               4,200                 17,200                   29,800
Depreciation and amortization
  expense.....................                (301,200)           (278,900)              (421,500)              (1,001,600)
Impairment charges.......                         --                   --              (2,664,900)              (2,664,900)
Income tax (expense) /
  benefit...................                   (42,000)           (120,800)                    --                 (162,800)
Expenditures for additions to
  long-lived assets...........            $       --          $        --          $           --             $        --


                                                 POS                SOLUTION                ASP
                                              PRODUCTS              SERVICES             SERVICES                TOTAL
                                          ----------------       --------------       --------------         -------------

Nine months ended March 31

2002

Interest expense..............            $ (1,715,700)       $    (13,700)         $     (37,800)            $(1,767,200)
Interest income...............                   5,000               8,800                     --                  13,800

                                       37
<PAGE>

Depreciation and amortization
  expense.....................                (568,200)           (155,200)              (906,500)             (1,630,100)
Income tax (expense) /
  benefit...................                    (7,900)             13,300                     --                   5,400
Expenditures for additions to
  long-lived assets...........            $    144,900        $    134,600          $      32,200             $   311,700

2001

Interest expense..............            $ (1,432,000)       $    (97,500)         $     (49,800)            $(1,579,300)
Interest income...............                 141,100              23,300                 46,700                 211,100
Depreciation and amortization
  expense.....................                (879,500)           (856,300)            (1,945,500)             (3,681,300)
Impairment Charge                                 --                  --              (20,030,900)            (20,030,900)
Income tax (expense) /
  benefit...................                    89,900            (296,900)                    --                (207,000)
Expenditures for additions to
  long-lived assets...........            $   (102,500)       $   (157,400)         $    (640,000)            $  (899,900)
</TABLE>

Revenues and long-lived  asset  information by geographic area as of and for the
three and nine months ended March 31:

Three months ended March 31:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                     UNITED
                                     STATES           EUROPE          ASIA          AUSTRALIA           TOTAL
                                  -----------       -----------     ----------   ----------------   ------------
<S>                                <C>             <C>             <C>               <C>            <C>
2002
Revenues........................   $  3,707,500    $  2,704,400    $          --     $    266,700   $  6,678,600
Long-lived assets...............   $  1,985,700    $         --    $     298,200     $     46,100   $  2,330,000


                                       38
<PAGE>

2001

Revenues........................   $  8,028,100     $ 5,989,900    $     (19,300)    $    701,500   $ 14,700,200
Long-lived assets...............   $  4,387,800     $   521,100    $   1,091,100     $     58,000   $  6,057,900


Nine months ended March 31:

                                     UNITED
                                     STATES           EUROPE          ASIA          AUSTRALIA           TOTAL
                                  -----------       -----------     ----------   ----------------   ------------
2002

Revenues........................    $14,420,300    $ 12,182,000    $          --      $ 1,244,900   $ 27,847,200
Long-lived assets...............   $  1,985,700    $         --    $     298,200      $    46,100   $  2,330,000

2001

Revenues........................    $30,580,400     $ 17,635,400   $     236,000      $ 2,021,400   $ 50,473,200
Long-lived assets...............    $ 4,387,800     $    521,100   $   1,091,100      $    58,000   $  6,057,900
</TABLE>

Note.17  Commitments

Litigation

            In October 1999,  we, and two former  officers of DTI, were named as
defendants in a breach of contract and intentional tort action brought by Daniel
Boudwin who claimed rights to computer  software  products once offered for sale
by certain of our subsidiaries. This action was taken in Pennsylvania's Delaware
Court of Common Pleas.  The plaintiff was seeking payment of one-half of all the
sales proceeds of the  commercial  software  product line of "Special  Delivery"
from  February 1997 and made claim to one-half of the asset  purchase  price (as
apportioned to the "Special  Delivery"  asset) paid by us to the shareholders of
DTI in April 1999. We and our  subsidiaries had  indemnification  rights against
one of the selling  shareholders  in  connection  with his  representations  and
warranties made about "Special Delivery" in various  documents.  Although we and
our subsidiaries  supported the selling shareholder's  position as it related to
the  plaintiff  in this  action,  cross-claims  were filed  against  the selling
shareholder,  for  indemnification  and  contribution,  for further  protection.
During 2001 we settled the case by stipulated  judgment and a one off payment of
$65,000 in full and final  settlement of any and all outstanding  liabilities in
respect of this case.








         In October and November 2000,  eight  purported  class action  lawsuits
were  filed  against  us, our Chief  Executive  Officer,  and our  former  Chief
Financial  Officer in the United States District Court for the Central  District
of California  for alleged  violations of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934.
After the  defendants  moved to dismiss each of the actions,  the lawsuits  were
consolidated   under  a  single  action,   entitled  "In  re  Aspeon  Securities
Litigation,"  Case No. SACV 00-995 AHS (ANx),  and the appointed  lead plaintiff
voluntarily filed an amended and consolidated complaint. The defendants moved to
dismiss  that  complaint  and on April  23,  2001  the  Court  entered  an order
dismissing the complaint without  prejudice.  On May 21, 2001 the appointed lead
plaintiff  filed a third  complaint,  styled  as a "First  Amended  Consolidated
Complaint." On June 4, 2001 the  defendants  moved to dismiss this complaint and
on September 17, 2001 the United States  District Court  dismissed the suit with
prejudice and entered judgment in favor of the us and our officers. On September
20,  2001 the lead  plaintiff  in the class  action  suit  appealed  against the
dismissal of the case.  On January 21, 2003 the decision to dismiss the case was
upheld  but  the  lead  plaintiff  was  given  the  opportunity  to  remedy  the
deficiencies  in the complaint that had been filed.  Accordingly on May 30, 2003
the plaintiff filed its "Second Amended Consolidated  Complaint" which again was
subsequently  dismissed  by the  District  Court.  On November 26, 2003 the lead


                                       39
<PAGE>

plaintiff  filed its  "Third  Amended  Consolidated  Complaint"  which was again
dismissed  with  prejudice in March 2004. The lead plaintiff once again appealed
against  the  dismissal  and the United  States  Court of Appeals  for the Ninth
Circuit  affirmed the dismissal with prejudice on February 23, 2006. This is the
fifth  time  that  the  Courts  have  ruled  in  favor  of us  and  against  the
shareholders  who have  brought  this suit  against us. On each of the  previous
occasions the  shareholders  who have brought this suit against us have filed an
appeal  against the decision of the Courts.  There can be no assurance  that the
shareholders  who have  brought  this  suit  against  us will not file a further
appeal  against  the  Courts'  latest  ruling in which case we will  continue to
vigorously defend against the claims.

     In May 2000, we and a distributor  were named as defendants in an action in
the United States  District Court of Middle North  Carolina  brought by a former
customer  of  the  distributor.  In  the  case,  entitled  Performance  Oriented
Solutions, Inc. vs Scansource, Inc., and Javelin Systems, Inc., Case No: 1:00 CV
621 (M.D.N.C.),  the plaintiff  alleged certain  misrepresentations  made by the
defendants,  consequently  resulting in lost profits and incidental  losses.  In
addition,  the plaintiff was seeking punitive  damages.  The case was settled by
Stipulation  of  Voluntary  Dismissal  and a one off payment of $90,000 by us in
full and final  settlement of any and all liabilities  arising in respect of the
case.

         In August 2001, we, together with our Chief Executive Officer,  filed a
six count complaint  against our former  auditors,  PWC,  alleging  professional
negligence,   intentional  interference  with  prospective  business  advantage,
negligent  interference  with  prospective  economic  advantage,   violation  of
California   Business  and  Professions  Code  Sections  17200  and  17500,  and
defamation. In August 2003 we reached an out of court settlement in our law suit
against  PWC.  Under the terms of the  settlement  we received a payment of $1.3
million and agreement to write off certain  outstanding  invoices for accounting
and  legal  fees.  Consequently  we  recognized  a  gain  of  $1,007,000  on the
settlement  although  the net cash we  received  after  all costs  totaled  only
$136,000.

         In December  2003,  we  appointed  attorney  Frank G Blundo Jr. P.C. as
trustee in an  assignment  for the  benefit of the  creditors  of Aspeon and CCI
commencing effective January 1, 2004. Effective January 1, 2004, all of Aspeon's
and CCI's assets were transferred to the trustee for the benefit of those Aspeon
and CCI creditors who elected to  participate  in the assignment for the benefit
of Aspeon and CCI creditors.  The assets  transferred had a fair market value of
$496,000 and creditors totaling $3.7 million elected to participate and be bound
by the terms of the assignment for the benefit of Aspeon and CCI creditors under
which they no longer had any further claim against Aspeon or CCI. Certain Aspeon
and  CCI  creditors,  totaling  in  excess  of  $3.1  million,  elected  not  to
participate  in the  assignment  for the benefit of Aspeon and CCI creditors and
remained as outstanding liabilities of Aspeon and CCI.

Guarantees

          In July, 2001,  Javelin  Australia  entered into a factoring  facility
amounting  to  approximately  $500,000  or a lesser  amount  based  on  eligible
receivables.  The facility was cancelable on 30 days notice by either party. The
agreement provided for a discount rate of 1.75% + the bank's published overdraft
index rate, and a factoring service fee of 0.50%. Borrowings under the line were
restricted  to the  operations  of  Javelin  Australia  and could not be used to
support our other operations. Aspeon provided a guarantee for this facility that
was to be  released  on its sale of Javelin  Australia  in  January  2003 and in
respect of which it was indemnified by the purchaser of Javelin Australia.

         We  leased  office  and  warehouse  space in  Warrington,  Cheshire  UK
comprising approximately 7,200 square feet to support sales, administration, and
warehousing  activities  for the Solutions  Services  business.  We paid rent of

                                       40
<PAGE>

approximately  $4,500 per month.  The lease expired in 2001 and was subsequently
extended to September 2003. Aspeon,  Inc. provided a guaranty in respect of this
lease that was to be released on its sale of RGB in March 2002 and in respect of
which it was  indemnified by the  purchasers of RGB.  Aspeon,  Inc.'s  potential
contingent  liability in respect of this lease ended in September  2003 with the
expiration of the lease

Note.18  Subsequent Events

         On March 22, 2002 we signed an  agreement  to sell our  subsidiary  RGB
(renamed  Javelin Holdings  International  Ltd.), the UK holding company that in
turn owned our Javelin Europe and Jade subsidiaries, to an investment group that
included  members  of the  existing  UK  management  team for  $125,995  and the
repayment of inter-company  debt.  $750,000 was paid on signing with $175,000 to
be paid upon completion of a technology escrow agreement.

         On May 1, 2002 we signed an agreement  with the holder of our Preferred
Shares  that had been in  default.  Under that  agreement,  in return for a cash
payment of $447,500 by us (a) we were released from all liabilities  relating to
our  outstanding  Series A  Convertible  Exchangeable  Preferred  Stock  and the
documents under which those securities had been issued and were outstanding; (b)
all of our outstanding  Series A Convertible  Exchangeable  Preferred Stock were
cancelled; (c) a warrant previously issued by us entitling the holder thereof to
purchase  583,334  shares of our common stock was  cancelled;  and (d) a warrant
previously  issued by our  subsidiary,  Aspeon  Solutions,  entitling the holder
thereof to purchase 1,250,000 shares of the common stock of Aspeon Solutions was
cancelled.  We believed  that the  settlement  had a net positive  effect on our
balance sheet of approximately $19 million.

         In June 2002 we terminated the activities of RCS.

         On  January  17,  2003,  we sold  our  Australian  subsidiary,  Javelin
Australia,  to Mr. Matthew Maley. Prior to the sale, Mr. Maley had served as our
general manager of that  subsidiary.  We received $80,000 at the closing of this
transaction.  Under the Share Sale Agreement  relating to this transaction,  Mr.
Maley agreed to cause Javelin  Australia to pay its account payable to us in the
amount of $239,000 in monthly installments of $10,000 each until the full amount
of the account  payable has been paid.  Mr. Maley  personally  guaranteed  these
payments.

         During the fiscal  years  ending June 30, 2002 and 2003,  we used every
effort to return to profitability  through  on-going cost  reductions,  to raise
additional debt and, or, equity funding and to identify strategic  opportunities
for our sale or the sale of certain of our subsidiaries  However,  the weak tech
market,  together with our inability to produce  audited  accounts and come into
compliance  with the listing  conditions of Nasdaq or over the counter  bulletin
board  markets,  meant we were  unable to attract new  customers  or the debt or
equity financing necessary to secure our financial future.

         On June 30, 2003 we decided to  discontinue  the operations of our last
two  operating  businesses,  Javelin and CCI.  Javelin  ceased  operations  with
immediate effect while CCI completed certain outstanding  customer orders before
ceasing  production  on August  3, 2003 and  continued  to  subcontract  certain
maintenance activities through December 31, 2003.

         In August  2003 we reached an out of court  settlement  in our law suit
against  PWC.  Under the terms of the  settlement  we received a payment of $1.3
million and agreement to write off certain  outstanding  invoices for accounting
and  legal  fees.  Consequently  we  recognized  a  gain  of  $1,007,000  on the
settlement  although  the net cash we  received  after  all costs  totaled  only
$136,000.

         In December  2003,  we  appointed  attorney  Frank G Blundo Jr. P.C. as
trustee in an  assignment  for the  benefit of the  creditors  of Aspeon and CCI
commencing effective January 1, 2004. Effective January 1, 2004, all of Aspeon's
and CCI's assets were transferred to the trustee for the benefit of those Aspeon

                                       41
<PAGE>

and CCI creditors who elected to  participate  in the assignment for the benefit
of Aspeon and CCI creditors.  The assets  transferred had a fair market value of
$496,000 and creditors totaling $3.7 million elected to participate and be bound
by the terms of the assignment for the benefit of Aspeon and CCI creditors under
which they no longer had any further claim against  Aspeon or CCI.  Consequently
we recognized a gain of $3.2 million on the  establishment of the assignment for
the  benefit  of Aspeon and CCI  creditors.  Certain  Aspeon and CCI  creditors,
totaling in excess of $3.1 million, elected not to participate in the assignment
for the  benefit  of  Aspeon  and CCI  creditors  and  remained  as  outstanding
liabilities of Aspeon and CCI.

         Following  the  establishment  for the  assignment  for the  benefit of
Aspeon  and CCI  creditors  in January  2004,  we had no  assets,  no  operating
business or other source of income,  outstanding  liabilities  in excess of $7.9
million,  an  outstanding  law  suit  brought  against  us  by  certain  of  our
shareholders,  were  substantially  in arrears in  respect  of  maintaining  our
financial  records and our SEC filings,  were no longer  listed on Nasdaq or the
over the  counter  bulletin  board and in due course  ceased to be listed on the
Pink Sheets.

         In April 2005, we appointed  David J Cutler as a new director and Chief
Executive   Officer  and   subsequent  to  that  are  now  focused  on  reaching
satisfactory  negotiated settlements with our outstanding creditors,  vigorously
defending  against any further  appeal  that may be made  against our  currently
successful  defense  of the  law  suit  brought  against  us by  certain  of our
shareholders, bringing our financial records and SEC filings up to date, seeking
a listing on the over the counter bulletin board,  raising  additional debt and,
or,  equity  to  finance  settlements  with  creditors  and to meet our  ongoing
operating  expenses and attempting to merge with another entity with experienced
management and opportunities for growth in return for shares of our common stock
to create value for our shareholders. There can be no assurance that this series
of events will be successfully completed.

         On April 22, 2005,  our sole  director,  David J Cutler entered into an
agreement  with Frank G Blundo,  Jr.  P.C.,  trustee of the  assignment  for the
benefit of Aspeon and CCI creditors,  subject to due diligence,  to invest up to
$50,000  cash in us for the benefit of our  creditors  in return for a number of
shares of our common stock to be determined. Following the completion of the due
diligence process during the three months ended December 31, 2005, it was agreed
with Frank G Blundo,  Jr.  P.C.,  trustee of the  assignment  for the benefit of
Aspeon and CCI  creditors,  that Mr.  Cutler would invest  $20,000 in us for the
benefit  of Aspeon  and CCI  creditors  in return  for a number of shares of our
common  stock to be  determined.  Accordingly  during  the  three  months  ended
December 31, 2005  $20,000  which had been placed in escrow with Frank G Blundo,
Jr. P.C. by Mr. Cutler was released for the benefit of Aspeon and CCI creditors.
On May 31, 2006, based on an independent third party valuation,  the majority of
our independent  directors approved the issue of 10,536,775 shares of our common
stock to Mr.  Cutler for the  conversion  of  $14,243  of his debt into  equity.
Following  the issue of these shares of our common stock Mr.  Cutler owned 52.7%
of  our  total  authorized  and  issued  share  capital  and  still  had a  loan
outstanding to us of approximately $178,000.

         On  September  9, 2005 we received a letter from the SEC dated June 24,
2005  indicating  that  unless  we  came  into  compliance  with  the  reporting
requirements under the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 within 15 days we may be
deregistered.  On  September  12, 2005 we faxed a letter to the SEC's  Office of
Enforcement  Liaison  indicating our intention to come into  compliance with the
reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by November 15,
2005.

         On  September  12,  2005  we  retained  Larry   O'Donnell,   CPA,  P.C.
(`O'Donnell') as our independent auditing firm.

         By November  15, 2005 we  completed  all  required  SEC filings for the
period July 1, 2003 through  September 30, 2005.  However,  we had not completed
all required SEC filings in respect of the period April 1, 2001 through June 30,

                                       42
<PAGE>

2003 although we had included  substantial  financial  extracts and all material
disclosures  in respect  of these  periods in the  filings we had  completed  in
respect  of  subsequent  periods.  We  believed  the  cost  to  shareholders  in
completing  these  filings in  respect of these  earlier  periods  exceeded  any
benefit to shareholders in completing  these filings as the information in these
filings  was at  least  two  to  four  years  old,  no  longer  relevant  to our
shareholders given our decision to cease all trading operations made on June 30,
2003 and that all material  information in respect of these earlier  periods has
been made available to our shareholders in our SEC filings for later periods.

         In January 2006 we were  contacted  by the SEC's Office of  Enforcement
Liaison who notified us that while they  recognized  the progress we had made in
bringing our SEC filings up to date,  they still  considered us to be delinquent
in our  filings  because of our  failure to  complete  filings in respect of the
period  April 1, 2001 through  June 30,  2003.  In August 2006,  on the basis of
further  audit work and a review of  subsequent  events  performed by O'Donnell,
O'Donnell  completed  the audit of our June 30,  2001 and in  September  2006 we
filed the Forms 10QSB for the three months ended  September 30, 2001,  the three
and six months ended December 31, 2001 and the three and none months ended March
31, 2002. We are currently  establishing  the likely costs and  practicality  of
completing the SEC filings and related financial statements for the period April
1, 2002 through June 30, 2003. In the meantime there continues to be a risk that
our  shares  of  common  stock  may be  deregistered  by  the  SEC's  Office  of
Enforcement  Liaison due the  continued  delinquency  of our SEC filings for the
period April 1, 2002 through June 30, 2003.

         On February  23, 2006 the United  States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit affirmed the dismissal with prejudice of the law suit brought against us
by certain  of our  shareholders.  This is the fifth  time that the Courts  have
ruled in favor of us and against the  shareholders  who have  brought  this suit
against us. On each of the previous  occasions the shareholders who have brought
this suit  against us have filed an appeal  against the  decision of the Courts.
There can be no  assurance  that the  shareholders  who have  brought  this suit
against us will not file a further  appeal  against the Courts' latest ruling in
which case we will continue to vigorously defend against the claims.

         Effective March 13, 2006, David Cutler,  at that time our sole director
and officer,  appointed  Wesley F Whiting and Redgie Green as new, non executive
directors to join him on our board of directors.

         On May 31, 2006,  based on an independent  third party  valuation,  the
majority of our independent directors approved the issue of 10,536,775 shares of
our common stock to Mr.  Cutler for the  conversion  of $14,243 of his debt into
equity. Following the issue of these shares of our common stock Mr. Cutler owned
52.7% of our total  authorized  and issued  share  capital  and still had a loan
outstanding to us of approximately $178,000

         In August  2006,  on the basis of  further  audit  work and a review of
subsequent events performed by O'Donnell,  O'Donnell  completed the audit of our
June 30, 2001  financial  statements  and in  September  2006 we filed the Forms
10QSB for the three months ended  September  30, 2001,  the three and six months
ended  December 31, 2001 and the three and none months ended March 31, 2002.  We
are currently  establishing  the likely costs and practicality of completing the
SEC  filings  and  related  financial  statements  for the period  April 1, 2002
through  June 30,  2003.In the  meantime  there  continues to be a risk that our
shares of common stock may be  deregistered  by the SEC's Office of  Enforcement
Liaison due the continued delinquency of our SEC filings for the period April 1,
2002 through June 30, 2003.

                                       43
<PAGE>

ITEM 2. Management's  Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations.

         The  following  discussion  should  be read  in  conjunction  with  the
consolidated  financial  statements  included in this  report.  This  discussion
contains  forward-looking  statements that involve risks and uncertainties.  Our
actual results could differ  materially from those  anticipated in these forward
looking  statements  as a result of any  number of  factors,  including  but not
limited to, our ability to reach satisfactorily  negotiated settlements with our
outstanding creditors,  vigorously defend against any further appeal that may be
made against our currently successful defense of the law suit brought against us
by certain of our  shareholders,  bring our financial records and SEC filings up
to date,  achieve a listing on the over the counter  bulletin board,  raise debt
and, or, equity to fund  negotiated  settlements  with our creditors and to meet
our ongoing  operating  expenses and merge with another entity with  experienced
management and opportunities for growth in return for shares of our common stock
to create value for our shareholders.

OVERVIEW

         We were  incorporated  in the Sate of Delaware in September  1995 under
the name Sunwood Research,  Inc. We changed our name to Javelin Systems, Inc. in
October 1996 and  subsequently  to Aspeon,  Inc. in December  1999.  Our mailing
address is 2460 West 26th Avenue, Suite 380-C, Denver,  Colorado,  80211 and our
telephone number is 303-380-9784.

         Effective  June 30, 2003 we made the  decision to  discontinue  all our
remaining  operating  businesses  and are now focused on  reaching  satisfactory
negotiated  settlements  with our outstanding  creditors,  vigorously  defending
against any further  appeal that may be made  against our  currently  successful
defense of the law suit  brought  against  us by  certain  of our  shareholders,
bringing our financial records and SEC filings up to date,  seeking a listing on
the over the  counter  bulletin  board,  raising  debt and,  or,  equity to fund
negotiated  settlements  with our  creditors  and to meet our ongoing  operating
expenses and attempting to merge with another entity with experienced management
and  opportunities for growth in return for shares of our common stock to create
value for our shareholders. There can be no assurance that this series of events
will be successfully completed.

            Prior  to  our  cessation  of  operations,  our  principal  business
activities were:

    - POS PRODUCTS.  Javelin Systems, a division of Aspeon, Inc. ("Javelin") and
CCI Group, Inc. ("CCI"), a subsidiary of Aspeon, Inc.,  designed,  manufactured,
marketed  and sold open system  touch  screen  point of sale  ("POS")  computers
primarily to the foodservice and retail industries (the "POS Products").

    -SOLUTION SERVICES.  Through our CCI, Jade Communications  Limited ("Jade"),
RGB/Trinet Limited ("RGB"), (subsequently renamed Javelin Holdings International
Limited (UK)),  (collectively "RGB/Jade") and Aspact IT Services (Singapore) Pte
Ltd. ("Aspact")  subsidiaries,  we provided  information  technology  management
services  for  customers  that did not intend or were not able to hire their own
information  technology  personnel  (the  "Solution  Services").  These services
included network design and management,  installation of computer systems, local
and wide area network support, maintenance and repair, and help desk support.

    - APPLICATION SERVICES PROVIDER. Through our Aspeon Solutions, Inc. ("Aspeon
Solutions"),  Dynamic  Technologies,  Inc.  ("DTI"),  SB Holdings,  Inc. ("SB"),
Restaurant   Consulting  Services  ("RCS")  and  Monument  Software  Corporation
("Monument")  subsidiaries,  we  operated  as an  application  service  provider

                                       44
<PAGE>

("ASP"). Our ASP services enabled software applications to be deployed, managed,
supported and upgraded from centrally located servers, rather than on individual
computers (the "ASP Services").  Our ASP Services primarily were directed toward
customers in the foodservice industry.

            An over view of the major events since incorporation is as follows:

            On November 1, 1996,  we completed an initial  public  offering (the
"IPO")  of  850,000  shares of our  common  stock at $5.00  per  share,  netting
proceeds of approximately $3.2 million. Proceeds were used to repay debt with an
outstanding  balance  of  approximately   $745,000  and  for  general  corporate
purposes.

            In December 1997, we acquired all of the outstanding common stock of
POSNET Computers,  Inc.  ("Posnet") and CCI Group, Inc. ("CCI").  Posnet and CCI
provided  full  turn-key   systems   integration   services,   including  system
consulting, staging, training, deployment, product support and maintenance.

            In  March  and  April  1998,  we  established  three   international
subsidiaries to expand our sales and distribution  channels in the international
marketplace.  The  international  subsidiaries  were:  Javelin Systems  (Europe)
Limited   ("Javelin   Europe")   headquartered   in  England;   Javelin  Systems
International Pte Ltd ("Javelin Asia")  headquartered in Singapore;  and Javelin
Systems Australia Pty Limited ("Javelin Australia"), subsequently renamed Aspeon
Systems (Asia Pacific) Pty Ltd, headquartered in Australia.

            In May 1998,  Javelin Asia  acquired all of the  outstanding  common
stock  of  Aspact  IT  Services  (Singapore)  Pte  Ltd  ("Aspact").  Aspact  was
headquartered  in  Singapore  and  provided  consulting  and system  integration
services.

            In November 1998, we completed a public offering of 1,395,000 shares
of our common stock at $6.75 per share,  netting proceeds of approximately  $8.1
million. Proceeds were used to repay borrowings under a revolving line of credit
of approximately  $3.2 million,  to purchase all of the outstanding common stock
of RGB/Trinet Limited ("RGB"),  which was subsequently  renamed Javelin Holdings
International Limited (UK), and Jade Communications Ltd ("Jade") and for general
corporate  purposes.  RGB and Jade were  headquartered  in England and  provided
complementary  Wide Area  Networking  (WAN)  products and services  primarily to
large retail, hospitality, and telecommunications companies.

            During the  course of 1998 we  established  a 75% owned  subsidiary,
Teneo Ltd ("Teneo"), in an effort to expand our service management and wide area
network solutions business.

            In January 1999 the business  and assets of Posnet were  transferred
from Posnet and merged with the business and assets of CCI.

            In February 1999, we completed a public offering of 2,375,000 shares
of our common stock at $12.25 per share, netting proceeds of approximately $26.9
million.  Proceeds were used to purchase the outstanding common stock of Dynamic
Technologies,  Inc. ("DTI") and SB Holdings, Inc. ("SB") and for working capital
and general  corporate  purposes.  DTI and SB provided custom  Internet/Intranet
software and services.

            In August 1999, we acquired all of the outstanding  capital stock of
Restaurant  Consulting  Services,  Inc. ("RCS").  RCS implemented,  operated and
supported packaged software applications for the restaurant industry.

            In  January  2000,  we  created  Aspeon  Solutions,   Inc.  ("Aspeon
Solutions")  as a wholly owned  subsidiary to centralize  and continue the rapid
development of our ASP service business.

                                       45
<PAGE>

            On March 8, 2000 we completed a private placement of securities with
Marshall Capital  Management,  Inc., an affiliate of Credit Suisse First Boston,
in  which  we sold an  aggregate  of  10,000  shares  of  Series  A  Convertible
Exchangeable  Preferred  Stock  (the  "Preferred  Stock"),  a warrant to acquire
583,334 shares of our common stock and a warrant to acquire  1,250,000 shares of
Aspeon Solutions, one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. Proceeds to us from this
placement  amounted  to $9.6  million,  net of offering  costs,  which were used
primarily to acquire Monument Software Corporation  ("Monument"),  settle future
contingent  payments associated with the acquisition of RCS, hire management and
staff  personnel,   expand  corporate  facilities  and  fund  our  ASP  Services
operations. Monument specialized in the rapid implementation of enterprise-class
financial systems with an emphasis on Oracle Financials

            During  fiscal  2000,  we  sustained  significant  losses and we had
experienced negative cash flows from our operations since inception.  As at June
30,  2000 we were in default of  certain  covenants  under the terms of both our
credit  facility  and  Preferred  Stock and were  delinquent  in the  payment of
various  trade  payables.  Our ability to meet our  obligations  in the ordinary
course of business was  dependent  upon the success of our attempts to return to
profitability,  obtain a waiver of credit  line and  Preferred  Stock  defaults,
raise additional financing through public and, or, private equity financings and
evaluate potential strategic opportunities. We sought to return to profitability
by  streamlining  operations  and  generating  on-going  cost  savings and began
evaluating  strategic  opportunities  for our sale or the sale of certain of our
subsidiaries.

            As part of our efforts to streamline our  operations,  during fiscal
2001 we merged the business of Javelin Asia into Javelin  Australia  and renamed
Javelin  Australia as Aspeon  Systems  (Asia  Pacific) Pty Ltd and we merged the
operations of Monument into those of RCS.

         In August  2000,  we executed a sale  agreement  with the then  current
director of Aspact (the "Purchaser"). The initial purchase price of $350,000 was
payable  to us in  monthly  installments  of  $14,600  commencing  in July 2001.
Consequently,  a loss on sale of  approximately  $229,000 was  recognized in the
three months ended September 30, 2000. In the event the Purchaser consummated an
initial  public  offering or disposed  of all or  substantially  all of Aspact's
common stock,  the  Purchaser was required to pay: a) the unpaid  balance of the
initial  consideration  and b) 50% of the net proceeds received from the initial
public  offering  less the amount  paid  under  (a),  in an amount not to exceed
$200,000. Concurrent with the sale agreement, the Purchaser was terminated as an
employee of ours.

         In   September    2000,   at   the    insistence   of   our   auditors,
PricewaterhouseCoopers,  LLC  ("PWC"),  we announced  that we would  restate our
first quarter 2000 financial statements as a result of accounting misstatements.
In October 2000 we announced we would require  additional  time to file our form
10-K report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000.

          In October 2000, the Nasdaq Stock Market ("Nasdaq")  suspended trading
in our common stock while it sought additional  information from us. On November
9, 2000, we participated  in a hearing before the Nasdaq Listing  Qualifications
Panel which was held for the purpose of evaluating  whether shares of our common
stock would continue to be listed on Nasdaq or if they would be delisted.

         In October and November 2000,  eight  purported  class action  lawsuits
were  filed  against  us, our Chief  Executive  Officer,  and our  former  Chief
Financial  Officer in the United States District Court for the Central  District
of California  for alleged  violations of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934.
After the  defendants  moved to dismiss each of the actions,  the lawsuits  were
consolidated   under  a  single  action,   entitled  "In  re  Aspeon  Securities
Litigation,"  Case No. SACV 00-995 AHS (ANx),  and the appointed  lead plaintiff
voluntarily filed an amended and consolidated complaint. The defendants moved to

                                       46
<PAGE>

dismiss  that  complaint  and on April  23,  2001  the  Court  entered  an order
dismissing the complaint without  prejudice.  On May 21, 2001 the appointed lead
plaintiff  filed a third  complaint,  styled  as a "First  Amended  Consolidated
Complaint." On June 4, 2001 the  defendants  moved to dismiss this complaint and
on September 17, 2001 the United States  District Court  dismissed the suit with
prejudice and entered judgment in favor of the us and our officers. On September
20,  2001 the lead  plaintiff  in the class  action  suit  appealed  against the
dismissal of the case.  On January 21, 2003 the decision to dismiss the case was
upheld  but  the  lead  plaintiff  was  given  the  opportunity  to  remedy  the
deficiencies  in the complaint that had been filed.  Accordingly on May 30, 2003
the plaintiff filed its "Second Amended Consolidated  Complaint" which again was
subsequently  dismissed  by the  District  Court.  On November 26, 2003 the lead
plaintiff  filed its  "Third  Amended  Consolidated  Complaint"  which was again
dismissed  with  prejudice in March 2004. The lead plaintiff once again appealed
against  the  dismissal  and the United  States  Court of Appeals  for the Ninth
Circuit  affirmed the dismissal with prejudice on February 23, 2006. This is the
fifth  time  that  the  Courts  have  ruled  in  favor  of us  and  against  the
shareholders  who have  brought  this suit  against us. On each of the  previous
occasions the  shareholders  who have brought this suit against us have filed an
appeal  against the decision of the Courts.  There can be no assurance  that the
shareholders  who have  brought  this  suit  against  us will not file a further
appeal  against  the  Courts'  latest  ruling in which case we will  continue to
vigorously defend against the claims.

         In December 2000 we restated the results for the fiscal  quarters ended
September 30, 1999, December 31, 1999 and March 31, 2000 by an aggregate of $1.7
million or $0.19 per share.  Revenue was reduced by $679,000 or 1.05%, our gross
profit was  decreased  by $206,000  or 1.22%,  $1.4  million of the  restatement
related to an  adjustment  to increase the amount  recorded  for the  beneficial
conversion  feature associated with the issuance of our Preferred Stock in March
2000 based upon an independent  valuation and the remaining  adjustments related
to unrecorded compensation expense, amortization of intangible assets, expensing
costs previously capitalized and the additional accrual of general expenses.

         Effective  as of  January  4,  2001 our  shares of  common  stock  were
delisted  from Nasdaq.  As we were in arrears with our filings with the SEC, our
shares of common  stock were not  eligible  to be traded on the over the counter
bulletin  board and  commenced  trading  on the Pink  Sheets  under  the  symbol
ASPE.PK. Subsequently our shares of common stock ceased to be traded on the Pink
Sheets and are now traded on the Gray Sheets.

         In January 2001 our auditors,  PWC, notified us that it was terminating
its auditor relationship with us effective immediately.

         In February  2001 our  subsidiary,  RGB,  sold its interest in Teneo to
employees of Teneo for the consideration of a $350,000 note. Consequently a gain
on sale of $432,000 was recognized during the quarter ended March 31, 2001.

         On March 1, 2001 we completed the sale of the consulting  contracts and
certain of the fixed assets our DTI subsidiary to a company  controlled by DTI's
former owners and certain of our  shareholders  for a purchase price of $900,000
and the return for  cancellation of 200,000 of shares of our common stock valued
at $60,000.  With the  completion of the transfer of its help desk business to a
third party on April 27, 2001, the business  activities of DTI ceased. A gain on
the sale of the net assets of DTI totaling  $820,900 was  recognized  during the
quarter ended March 31, 2001.

         On  March  19,  2001  we  retained  BDO  Seidman,  LLP  ("BDO")  as our
independent auditing firm. However, as PWC, our previous  independent  auditors,
refused to allow BDO access to PWC's prior year work  papers,  BDO was unable to
complete an audit of our financial statements for later periods at that time.

         During fiscal 2001,  despite our efforts to return to profitability and
the sale of certain of our  subsidiaries,  we continued to generate  significant
losses,  to be in default of certain  covenants under the terms of our Preferred

                                       47
<PAGE>

Stock,  to be delinquent  in the payment of various trade  payables and had been
unable to replace  our line of credit  which had been  repaid in full during the
course of the year.  While we had  appointed  new  auditors,  we were  unable to
generate  audited  financial  accounts due to the lack of  cooperation  from our
previous  auditors  and  consequently  were  unable to comply  with the  listing
requirements  of  either  Nasdaq or the over the  counter  bulletin  board.  Our
relegation  to the Pink Sheets had  serious  adverse  consequences  for both the
confidence  of our  customers or potential  customers and our ability to attract
new debt or equity financing.  The lawsuits brought against us by certain of our
shareholders  diverted a significant  amount of our  management's  time from our
operations which were also severely  effected by the collapse of the tech market
in early 2001.  Nevertheless we continued press ahead by attempting to return to
profitability  through  further cost  reductions,  renegotiate  the terms of our
Preferred  Stock,  settle  the  outstanding  shareholder  litigation,   evaluate
strategic  opportunities for our sale or the sale of certain of our subsidiaries
and raise additional debt and, or, equity funding.

         In August 2001 we, together with our Chief Executive  Officer,  filed a
six count complaint  against our former  auditors,  PWC,  alleging  professional
negligence,   intentional  interference  with  prospective  business  advantage,
negligent  interference  with  prospective  economic  advantage,   violation  of
California   Business  and  Professions  Code  Sections  17200  and  17500,  and
defamation.

         On March 22, 2002 we signed an  agreement  to sell our  subsidiary  RGB
(renamed  Javelin Holdings  International  Ltd.), the UK holding company that in
turn owned our Javelin Europe and Jade subsidiaries, to an investment group that
included  members  of the  existing  UK  management  team for  $125,995  and the
repayment of inter-company  debt.  $750,000 was paid on signing with $175,000 to
be paid upon completion of a technology escrow agreement

         On May 1, 2002 we signed an agreement  with the holder of our Preferred
Shares  that had been in  default.  Under that  agreement,  in return for a cash
payment of $447,500 by us (a) we were released from all liabilities  relating to
our  outstanding  Series A  Convertible  Exchangeable  Preferred  Stock  and the
documents under which those securities had been issued and were outstanding; (b)
all of our outstanding  Series A Convertible  Exchangeable  Preferred Stock were
cancelled; (c) a warrant previously issued by us entitling the holder thereof to
purchase  583,334  shares of our common stock was  cancelled;  and (d) a warrant
previously  issued by our  subsidiary,  Aspeon  Solutions,  entitling the holder
thereof to purchase 1,250,000 shares of the common stock of Aspeon Solutions was
cancelled.  We believed  that the  settlement  had a net positive  effect on our
balance sheet of approximately $19 million.

         In June 2002 we terminated the activities of RCS.

         On  January  17,  2003,  we sold  our  Australian  subsidiary,  Javelin
Australia,  to Mr. Matthew Maley. Prior to the sale, Mr. Maley had served as our
general manager of that  subsidiary.  We received $80,000 at the closing of this
transaction.  Under the Share Sale Agreement  relating to this transaction,  Mr.
Maley agreed to cause Javelin  Australia to pay its account payable to us in the
amount of $239,000 in monthly installments of $10,000 each until the full amount
of the account  payable has been paid.  Mr. Maley  personally  guaranteed  these
payments.

         During the fiscal  years  ending June 30, 2002 and 2003,  we used every
effort to return to profitability  through  on-going cost  reductions,  to raise
additional debt and, or, equity funding and to identify strategic  opportunities
for our sale or the sale of certain of our subsidiaries  However,  the weak tech
market,  together with our inability to produce  audited  accounts and come into
compliance  with the listing  conditions of Nasdaq or over the counter  bulletin
board  markets,  meant we were  unable to attract new  customers  or the debt or
equity financing necessary to secure our financial future.

                                       48
<PAGE>

         On June 30, 2003 we decided to  discontinue  the operations of our last
two  operating  businesses,  Javelin and CCI.  Javelin  ceased  operations  with
immediate effect while CCI completed certain outstanding  customer orders before
ceasing  production  on August  3, 2003 and  continued  to  subcontract  certain
maintenance activities through December 31, 2003.

         In August  2003 we reached an out of court  settlement  in our law suit
against  PWC.  Under the terms of the  settlement  we received a payment of $1.3
million and agreement to write off certain  outstanding  invoices for accounting
and  legal  fees.  Consequently  we  recognized  a  gain  of  $1,007,000  on the
settlement  although  the net cash we  received  after  all costs  totaled  only
$136,000.

         In December  2003,  we  appointed  attorney  Frank G Blundo Jr. P.C. as
trustee in an  assignment  for the  benefit of the  creditors  of Aspeon and CCI
commencing effective January 1, 2004. Effective January 1, 2004, all of Aspeon's
and CCI's assets were transferred to the trustee for the benefit of those Aspeon
and CCI creditors who elected to  participate  in the assignment for the benefit
of Aspeon and CCI creditors.  The assets  transferred had a fair market value of
$496,000 and creditors totaling $3.7 million elected to participate and be bound
by the terms of the assignment for the benefit of Aspeon and CCI creditors under
which they no longer had any further claim against  Aspeon or CCI.  Consequently
we recognized a gain of $3.2 million on the  establishment of the assignment for
the  benefit  of Aspeon and CCI  creditors.  Certain  Aspeon and CCI  creditors,
totaling in excess of $3.1 million, elected not to participate in the assignment
for the  benefit  of  Aspeon  and CCI  creditors  and  remained  as  outstanding
liabilities of Aspeon and CCI.

         Following  the  establishment  for the  assignment  for the  benefit of
Aspeon  and CCI  creditors  in January  2004,  we had no  assets,  no  operating
business or other source of income,  outstanding  liabilities  in excess of $7.9
million,  an  outstanding  law  suit  brought  against  us  by  certain  of  our
shareholders,  were  substantially  in arrears in  respect  of  maintaining  our
financial  records and our SEC filings,  were no longer  listed on Nasdaq or the
over the  counter  bulletin  board and in due course  ceased to be listed on the
Pink Sheets.

         In April 2005, we appointed  David J Cutler as a new director and Chief
Executive   Officer  and   subsequent  to  that  are  now  focused  on  reaching
satisfactory  negotiated settlements with our outstanding creditors,  vigorously
defending  against any further  appeal  that may be made  against our  currently
successful  defense  of the  law  suit  brought  against  us by  certain  of our
shareholders, bringing our financial records and SEC filings up to date, seeking
a listing on the over the counter bulletin board,  raising  additional debt and,
or,  equity  to  finance  settlements  with  creditors  and to meet our  ongoing
operating  expenses and attempting to merge with another entity with experienced
management and opportunities for growth in return for shares of our common stock
to create value for our shareholders.

         On April 22, 2005,  our sole  director,  David J Cutler entered into an
agreement  with Frank G Blundo,  Jr.  P.C.,  trustee of the  assignment  for the
benefit of Aspeon and CCI creditors,  subject to due diligence,  to invest up to
$50,000  cash in us for the benefit of our  creditors  in return for a number of
shares of our common stock to be determined. Following the completion of the due
diligence process during the three months ended December 31, 2005, it was agreed
with Frank G Blundo,  Jr.  P.C.,  trustee of the  assignment  for the benefit of
Aspeon and CCI  creditors,  that Mr.  Cutler would invest  $20,000 in us for the
benefit  of Aspeon  and CCI  creditors  in return  for a number of shares of our
common  stock to be  determined.  Accordingly  during  the  three  months  ended
December 31, 2005  $20,000  which had been placed in escrow with Frank G Blundo,
Jr. P.C. by Mr. Cutler was released for the benefit of Aspeon and CCI creditors.
On May 31, 2006, based on an independent third party valuation,  the majority of
our independent  directors approved the issue of 10,536,775 shares of our common
stock to Mr.  Cutler for the  conversion  of  $14,243  of his debt into  equity.
Following  the issue of these shares of our common stock Mr.  Cutler owned 52.7%
of  our  total  authorized  and  issued  share  capital  and  still  had a  loan
outstanding to us of approximately $178,000.

                                       49
<PAGE>

         On  September  9, 2005 we received a letter from the SEC dated June 24,
2005  indicating  that  unless  we  came  into  compliance  with  the  reporting
requirements under the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 within 15 days we may be
deregistered.  On  September  12, 2005 we faxed a letter to the SEC's  Office of
Enforcement  Liaison  indicating our intention to come into  compliance with the
reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by November 15,
2005.

         On  September  12,  2005  we  retained  Larry   O'Donnell,   CPA,  P.C.
(`O'Donnell') as our independent auditing firm.

         By November  15, 2005 we  completed  all  required  SEC filings for the
period July 1, 2003 through  September 30, 2005.  However,  we had not completed
all required SEC filings in respect of the period April 1, 2001 through June 30,
2003 although we had included  substantial  financial  extracts and all material
disclosures  in respect  of these  periods in the  filings we had  completed  in
respect  of  subsequent  periods.  We  believed  the  cost  to  shareholders  in
completing  these  filings in  respect of these  earlier  periods  exceeded  any
benefit to shareholders in completing  these filings as the information in these
filings  was at  least  two  to  four  years  old,  no  longer  relevant  to our
shareholders given our decision to cease all trading operations made on June 30,
2003 and that all material  information in respect of these earlier  periods has
been made available to our shareholders in our SEC filings for later periods.

         In January 2006 we were  contacted  by the SEC's Office of  Enforcement
Liaison who notified us that while they  recognized  the progress we had made in
bringing our SEC filings up to date,  they still  considered us to be delinquent
in our  filings  because of our  failure to  complete  filings in respect of the
period  April 1, 2001 through  June 30,  2003.  In August 2006,  on the basis of
further  audit work and a review of  subsequent  events  performed by O'Donnell,
O'Donnell  completed the audit of our June 30, 2001 financial  statements and in
September 2006 we filed the Forms 10QSB for the three months ended September 30,
2001,  the three and six months  ended  December 31, 2001 and the three and none
months ended March 31, 2002. We are currently  establishing the likely costs and
practicality of completing the SEC filings and related financial  statements for
the period April 1, 2002 through June 30, 2003.In the meantime  there  continues
to be a risk that our shares of common  stock may be  deregistered  by the SEC's
Office of Enforcement  Liaison due the continued  delinquency of our SEC filings
for the period April 1, 2002 through June 30, 2003

         On February  23, 2006 the United  States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit affirmed the dismissal with prejudice of the law suit brought against us
by certain  of our  shareholders.  This is the fifth  time that the Courts  have
ruled in favor of us and against the  shareholders  who have  brought  this suit
against us. On each of the previous  occasions the shareholders who have brought
this suit  against us have filed an appeal  against the  decision of the Courts.
There can be no  assurance  that the  shareholders  who have  brought  this suit
against us will not file a further  appeal  against the Courts' latest ruling in
which case we will continue to vigorously defend against the claims.

         Effective March 13, 2006, David Cutler,  at that time our sole director
and officer,  appointed  Wesley F Whiting and Redgie Green as new, non executive
directors to join him on our board of directors.

         On May 31, 2006,  based on an independent  third party  valuation,  the
majority of our independent directors approved the issue of 10,536,775 shares of
our common stock to Mr.  Cutler for the  conversion  of $14,243 of his debt into
equity. Following the issue of these shares of our common stock Mr. Cutler owned
52.7% of our total  authorized  and issued  share  capital  and still had a loan
outstanding to us of approximately $178,000.

         In August  2006,  on the basis of  further  audit  work and a review of
subsequent events performed by O'Donnell,  O'Donnell  completed the audit of our
June 30, 2001  financial  statements  and in  September  2006 we filed the Forms
10QSB for the three months ended  September  30, 2001,  the three and six months

                                       50
<PAGE>

ended  December 31, 2001 and the three and nine months ended March 31, 2002.  We
are currently  establishing  the likely costs and practicality of completing the
SEC  filings  and  related  financial  statements  for the period  April 1, 2002
through June 30, 2003.  In the  meantime  there  continues to be a risk that our
shares of common stock may be  deregistered  by the SEC's Office of  Enforcement
Liaison due the continued delinquency of our SEC filings for the period April 1,
2002 through June 30, 2003

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

            As of March 31, 2002, we had $ 178,000 cash and cash  equivalents on
hand, a working capital deficit of $ 22.1 million and a shareholders' deficit of
$18.8 million.

         As of June  30,  2006,  we had $7  cash on  hand,  $195 of  assets,  no
operating  business  or other  source  of  income,  outstanding  liabilities  of
approximately  $8.1  million,  a  stockholders'  deficit of  approximately  $8.1
million and a law suit brought against us by certain of our  shareholders  which
had been  ruled in our favor by the  Courts  but  which  could be  subject  to a
further appeal by the shareholders in question.

         We sustained  significant  losses  during the years ended June 30, 2001
and 2000 and had  experienced  negative  cash  flows from  operations  since our
inception.

         In October  2000,  we received a notice of default  from our  Preferred
Stockholders,  which  triggered  certain  payment  requirements  as  well  as  a
Repricing and Redemption Event, as defined in the Preferred Stock Agreement (see
Note 12 - page 28 above).  We were also  delinquent  in the  payments of various
trade payables.  These matters, among others, raised substantial doubt as to our
ability to continue as a going  concern.  Our continued  existence was dependent
upon, among other factors, our ability to return to profitability, the continued
forbearance of the our lenders and creditors,  the successful  renegotiation  of
the terms of our Preferred  Stock,  the outcome of  litigation  filed against us
which  alleged  violations of the federal  securities  laws (Note 17 see page 39
above),  and our ability to raise funds from additional debt and, or, equity. We
had reduced our workforce and planed to further reduce expenditures. We believed
that such reductions,  the securing of a new working capital borrowing facility,
together  with  funds  expected  to  be  generated  from  operations,  would  be
sufficient to meet our expected short-term needs for working capital,  exclusive
of any  obligation to redeem our Preferred  Stock as discussed in Note 12 - page
28 above. However,  there could be no assurance that sufficient cash flows would
be generated by us to avoid the further  depletion of our working capital,  that
we would successfully  renegotiate the terms of our Preferred Stock, or that the
outcome  of the  litigation  would  not have a  material  adverse  impact on our
operations.  Accordingly,  management  intended  to  obtain  additional  debt or
private equity  financing.  There could be no assurance that  additional debt or
equity financing would be available,  if and when needed, or that, if available,
such financing could be completed on commercially favorable terms.

         Subsequently  we were  unable  to  improve  the  profitability  or cash
generation of our operations or to obtain additional debt or equity.  During the
years  ended June 30, 2002 and 2003 we had no  alternative  but to sell or close
down our remaining operating  businesses leaving a substantial short fall to our
creditors.

            Consequently we are now dependent on raising  additional equity and,
or, debt to fund any negotiated  settlements with our outstanding  creditors and
meet our ongoing operating expenses.  There is no assurance that we will be able
to raise the  necessary  equity  and,  or,  debt that we will need to be able to
negotiate  acceptable  settlements  with our  outstanding  creditors or fund our
ongoing operating expenses.

            If we were to be subject to any further  appeal which may be made in
respect of the law suit brought against us by certain of our  shareholders it is
unlikely that the proceeds from our  Directors' and Officers'  insurance  policy

                                       51
<PAGE>

would  be  sufficient  to  meet  the  damages  assessed  and we  would  have  no
alternative but to file for bankruptcy.

         During  the  fiscal  years  ended  June 30,  2006 and 2005,  one of our
directors,  David J Cutler,  advanced to us $115,000 and $88,000 respectively by
way of loan,  bearing interest at 8%, to meet our ongoing operating expenses and
fund the costs of bringing  our  financial  statements  and SEC  reporting up to
date. $14,000 of this loan was converted to equity effective May 31, 2006. Since
June 30, 2006 Mr. Cutler has continued to make further  advances to us by way of
loan to meet our ongoing  operating  expenses and fund the costs of bringing our
financial  statements  and SEC  reporting  up to date as  required.  There is no
assurance  that Mr. Cutler will  continue to provide us with further  funding in
the future.

         It is our current  intention to seek to reach  satisfactory  negotiated
settlements  with our  outstanding  creditors,  vigorously  defend  against  any
further appeal that may be made against our currently  successful defense of the
law suit brought against us by certain of our shareholders,  bring our financial
records  and SEC  filings  up to date,  seek a listing  on the over the  counter
bulletin  board,  raise debt and, or,  equity  financing to fund the  negotiated
settlements  with our  creditors  and to meet  ongoing  operating  expanses  and
attempt  to  merge  with  another   entity  with   experienced   management  and
opportunities  for growth in return  for  shares of our  common  stock to create
value for our  shareholders..  There is no assurance  that this series of events
will be satisfactorily completed.

Delisting from NASDAQ Market and the Over the Counter Bulletin Board

            Our shares of common stock were listed on the Nasdaq National Market
System under the symbol  "ASPEE." On October 10,  2000,  the Nasdaq Stock Market
("Nasdaq")  suspended  trading  in our  shares of common  stock  while it sought
additional  information from us. On October 11, 2000, Nasdaq sent a letter to us
stating that our shares of common stock would be delisted  from Nasdaq if we did
not  file our Form  10-K  for the  fiscal  year  ended  June 30,  2000  with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  ("SEC") by October 18, 2000. Our Form 10-K
for the  fiscal  year  ended  June 30,  2000 was not  filed  with the SEC by the
October 18, 2000  deadline.  On  November 9, 2000 we  participated  in a hearing
before the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Panel which was held for the purpose of
evaluating  whether our shares of common  stock  would  continue to be listed on
Nasdaq or if they  would be  delisted.  Effective  January 4, 2001 our shares of
common stock were delisted from Nasdaq. As we were delinquent in our SEC filings
our  shares  of  common  stock  were not  eligible  to be listed on the over the
counter  bulletin board and  consequently  commenced  trading on the Pink Sheets
under the symbol ASPE.PK. Subsequently our shares of common stock have ceased to
be traded on the Pink Sheets and are now traded on the Grey Sheets.

         On  September  9, 2005 we received a letter from the SEC dated June 24,
2005  indicating  that  unless  we  came  into  compliance  with  the  reporting
requirements under the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 within 15 days we may be
deregistered.  On  September  12, 2005 we faxed a letter to the SEC's  Office of
Enforcement  Liaison  indicating our intention to come into  compliance with the
reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by November 15,
2005.

         By November  15, 2005 we  completed  all  required  SEC filings for the
period July 1, 2003 through  September 30, 2005.  However,  we had not completed
all required SEC filings in respect of the period April 1, 2001 through June 30,
2003 although we had included  substantial  financial  extracts and all material
disclosures  in respect  of these  periods in the  filings we had  completed  in
respect  of  subsequent  periods.  We  believed  the  cost  to  shareholders  in

                                       52
<PAGE>

completing  these  filings in  respect of these  earlier  periods  exceeded  any
benefit to shareholders in completing  these filings as the information in these
filings  was at  least  two  to  four  years  old,  no  longer  relevant  to our
shareholders given our decision to cease all trading operations made on June 30,
2003 and that all material  information in respect of these earlier  periods has
been made available to our shareholders in our SEC filings for later periods.

         In January 2006 we were  contacted  by the SEC's Office of  Enforcement
Liaison who notified us that while they  recognized  the progress we had made in
bringing our SEC filings up to date,  they still  considered us to be delinquent
in our  filings  because of our  failure to  complete  filings in respect of the
period  April 1, 2001 through  June 30,  2003.  In August 2006,  on the basis of
further  audit work and a review of  subsequent  events  performed by O'Donnell,
O'Donnell  completed the audit of our June 30, 2001 financial  statements and in
September 2006 we filed the Forms 10QSB for the three months ended September 30,
2001,  the three and six months  ended  December 31, 2001 and the three and nine
months ended March 31, 2002. We are currently  establishing the likely costs and
practicality of completing the SEC filings and related financial  statements for
the period April 1, 2002 through June 30, 2003. In the meantime there  continues
to be a risk that our shares of common  stock may be  deregistered  by the SEC's
Office of Enforcement  Liaison due the continued  delinquency of our SEC filings
for the period April 1, 2002 through June 30, 2003.

Results of  Operations  - Three  Months  Ended March 31, 2002  Compared to Three
Months Ended March 31, 2001

         On June 30, 2003 we decided to  discontinue  the operations of our last
two  operating  businesses,  Aspeon  and  CCI.  Aspeon  ceased  operations  with
immediate effect while CCI completed certain outstanding  customer orders before
ceasing production  operations on August 3, 2003 and its maintenance  operations
on December 31, 2003.

         In December  2003,  we  appointed  attorney  Frank G Blundo Jr. P.C. as
trustee  for an  assignment  for the  benefit of the  Aspeon  and CCI  creditors
commencing effective January 1, 2004. Effective January 1, 2004, all of Aspeon's
and CCI's assets were transferred to the trustee for the benefit of those Aspeon
and CCI creditors who elected to  participate  in the assignment for the benefit
of Aspeon and CCI creditors.  The assets  transferred had a fair market value of
$496,000 and creditors totaling $3.7 million elected to participate and be bound
by the terms of the assignment for the benefit of Aspeon and CCI creditors under
which they no longer had any further claim against Aspeon or CCI. Certain Aspeon
and CCI creditors, totaling in excess of 3.1 million, elected not to participate
in the  assignment  for the benefit of Aspeon and CCI  creditors and remained as
outstanding liabilities of Aspeon and CCI.

         Consequently  from  January  1,  2004 we had no  assets,  no  operating
business or other sources of income.


Revenue.

         Revenue  for the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2002 was  $6,679,000
compared to  $14,700,000  for the three months ended March 31, 20001, a decrease
of  $8,021,000  or 54.6%.  Our mix of  products  and  services  sold was largely
unchanged  between the three  months  ended Marc 31, 2002 and 2001.  The sale of
products  represented 66.9% of our total revenue in the three months ended March
31, 2002  compared to 69% the three  months  ended March 31, 2001, a decrease of
2.1%. Conversely the sale of services represented 33.1% of our total revenues in
the three  months  ended March 31, 2002  compared to 31% the three  months ended
March 31, 2001, an increase of 2.1%. The revenue for products sold for the three
months ended March 31, 2002 was $4,468,000 compared to $10,137,000 for the three
months ended March 31, 2001, a decrease of $5,669,000 or 55.9%.  The revenue for
services  provided  for the three  months  ended March 31,  2002 was  $2,211,000
compared to $4,563,000  for the three months ended March 31, 2001, a decrease of
$2,352,000 or 51.6%

                                       53
<PAGE>

         The decease in revenues  was due to the industry  wide  slowdown in POS
hardware sales and technology spending as a whole, together with the uncertainty
and loss of  confidence  in the  marketplace  in our  abilities  to support  our
products  arising from the  restatement of our financial  results,  the law suit
brought  against us by  certain  of our  shareholders,  the  resignation  of our
auditors, our de-listing from Nasdaq and our weakened financial position.

Cost of Sales

         Cost of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2002 was  $5,631,000
compared to $13,001,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2001, a decrease of
$7,370,000 or 56.7%,  broadly in line with the overall  54.6%  decrease in total
revenues.

         The cost of sales for  products  sold for the three  months ended March
31, 2002 was $3,380,000  compared to $9,752,000 for the three months ended March
31, 2001, a decrease of  $6,372,000 or 65.3%  compared to the 55.9%  decrease in
revenue  from the sale of  products as set out above,  a variance of 9.4%.  This
decrease  of cost of sales as a  percentage  of revenue  for  products  sold was
attributable  to increasing  inventory  reserves in the three months ended March
31, 2001 on our inventory of parts for the product lines to be discontinued. The
cost of  services  provided  for the  three  months  ended  March  31,  2002 was
$2,251,000  compared to $3,250,000  for the three months ended March 31, 2001, a
decrease of $999,000 or 30.7% compared to the 50.6% decrease in revenue from the
provision of services as set out above, a variance of 19.9%.  Cost of sales as a
percentage of revenue from services  provided  increased during the three months
ended  March 31, 2002 as we entered  into a one  significant  contract  with low
margins in 2000 and had a major  impact on margins in 2001 and our revenue  fell
by more than we were able to reduce our fixed costs of sales for services.

Gross Profit

         Gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2002 was  $1,048,000,
or 15.7% of revenue,  compared to $1,699,000, or 11.6% of revenue, for the three
months ended March 31, 2001,  a positive  variance of 4.1%.  The gross profit on
the sale of products was $1,088,000,  or 24.3% of revenue,  for the three months
ended March 31, 2002  compared to  $386,000,  or 3.8% of revenue,  for the three
months  ended March 31, 2001,  a positive  variance of 18.5%.  There was a gross
loss on the provision of services of $(40,000) or 1.8% of revenue, for the three
months ended March 31, 2002 compared to a gross profit of $1,313,000 or 28.8% of
revenue,  for the three  months  ended March 31,  2001,  a negative  variance of
30.6%. The reasons for these variances in gross profit are set out above.

Research and Development Expenses

         Research and development  expenses for the three months ended March 31,
2002 were  $169,000,  compared to $326,000  for the three months ended March 31,
2001,  a decrease of $157,000,  or 48.2%.  As a  percentage  of total  revenues,
research and development expenses amounted to 2.5% and 2.2% for the three months
ended March 31, 2002 and 2001  respectively,  an increase of 0.3%. The decreased
expenditure  on  research  and  development   relates  primarily  to  additional
development  costs and activities  relating to the design of new products in the
three months ended March 31, 2001.

General and Administrative Expenses.

         General and  administrative  expenses  for the three months ended March
31, 2002 were $2,070,000 compared to $5,271,000 for the three months ended March
31, 2001, a decrease of $3,201,000, or 60.7%. As a percentage of total revenues,
general  and  administrative  expenses  amounted  to 31% and 35.9% for the three
months  ended March 31,  2002 and 2001  respectively,  a decrease of 4.9%.  This
decrease was  primarily  due to the fact that the three months to March 31, 2001

                                       54
<PAGE>

included  substantial  one off  infrastructure  costs  associated  with  the ASP
service business, higher goodwill amortization costs, severance costs associated
with the  termination of certain  management,  substantial  legal and accounting
fees incurred in connection  with our 2000 audit and pending  litigation and the
loss incurred on the sale of Aspact.  Also adding to the greater  expense was an
increase in  reserves  for  doubtful  accounts  of $1.4  million,  approximately
$750,000 of which related to the ASP services  business,  part of which was sold
in March 2001.

Selling and Marketing Expenses

         Selling and  marketing  expenses  for the three  months ended March 31,
2002 were $374,000,  compared to $1,516,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2001, a decrease of  $1,142,000,  or 75.3%.  As a percentage of total  revenues,
selling and marketing  expenses  amounted to 5.6% and 10.3% for the three months
ended March 31, 2002 and 2001  respectively,  a decrease of 4.7%.  The  variance
arose  due to the  fact  that  the  three  months  to March  31,  2001  included
substantial one off costs in respect of ASP service sales  infrastructure  costs
while the three  months  ended March 31, 2002  reflected  the impact of the cost
reduction  programs  introduced  by us to  conserve  cash and attempt to achieve
profitability.

Gain on Debt Restructuring

         A gain of $520,000 was  recognized  in the three months ended March 31,
2002 in respect of the negotiate settlement of certain accounts payable pursuant
to debt restructuring  agreements.  There were no such gains in the three months
ended March 31, 2001.

Loss on Sale of Subsidiary

         A loss of  $(7,276,000)  was recognized in the three months ended March
31,  2002  in  respect  of  the  sale  of  our  subsidiaries   Javelin  Holdings
International, Ltd., Javelin Systems (Europe) Ltd and Jade Communications,  Ltd.
to an investment  group that included members of the existing UK management team
for  $125,995  and the  repayment of  inter-company  debt.  $750,000 was paid on
signing  with  $175,000  to be  paid  upon  completion  of a  technology  escrow
agreement. There were no such losses in the three months ended March 31, 2001.

Impairment Charge

         An impairment  charge of $2,665,000  was  recognized in the three ended
March 31, 2001  relating to the write off of goodwill for RCS and  Monument.  No
impairment charge was recognized in the three months ended March 31, 2002.

Operating Loss.

         An operating  loss of  $(8,321,000)  was recognized in the three months
ending March 31, 2002  compared to an  operating  loss of  $(8,079,000)  for the
three  months  ended March 31,  2001,  an increase of $242,000 or 3%, due to the
factors discussed above.

Interest and Other Income / (Expenses) Net

         Interest  expense and other  income /  (expenses)  for the three months
ended  March 31,  2002 was an expense  of  $(1,058,000),  compared  to income of
$460,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2000, a decrease of $1,518,000, or
more than%.  This  variance  was  primarily  due to other income of $1.2 million
recorded  in the three  months  ended  March 31,  2001 in respect of the sale of
Teneo and DTI and increased interest expense on our increased indebtedness.

                                       55
<PAGE>

Provision for Income Taxes.

         There was no  (provision)  or  credit  for  income  taxes for the three
months ended March 31, 2002,  compared to an expense of $(163,000) for the three
months ended March 31, 2001,  a variance of  $163,000,  or 100%,  arising from a
provision  required for foreign income taxes in the three months ended March 31,
2001 that was no required in the months ended March 31, 2002.

Net Loss Before Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change.

         A net loss  before  the  cumulative  effect  of  accounting  change  of
$(9,379,000)  was  recognized in the three months ending March 31, 2002 compared
to a net loss before the cumulative  effect of accounting change of $(7,782,000)
for the three months ended March 31, 2001, an increase of $1,597,000,  or 20.5%,
due to the factors discussed above.

Net Loss After Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change and Comprehensive Loss.

         The net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2002 was $(9,379,000)
compared to a comprehensive  loss of $(7,949,000) a variance of $1,430,000.  The
net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2001 was $(7,782,000)  compared to
a comprehensive  loss of $(8,375,000) a variance of $593,000.  In both years the
variance related to the change in the cumulative  foreign  currency  translation
adjustment relating to our non-US  subsidiaries in Australia,  Singapore and the
United Kingdom.

Accretion of Manditorily Redeemable Preferred Stock Discount & Dividend

         Accretion  of  manditorily  redeemable  preferred  stock  discount  and
manditorily  redeemable  preferred  stock dividend of $148,000 was recognized in
both  the  three  months  ending  March  31,  2002  and  2001.The  basis  of the
calculation of the accretion of manditorily  redeemable preferred stock discount
and  manditorily  redeemable  preferred  stock dividend is set out in Note 12 on
page 29 above.

Net Loss Available to Common Stockholders.

         A net  loss  available  to  common  stockholders  of  $(9,527,000)  was
recognized in the three months  ending March 31, 2002  compared to  $(7,930,000)
for the three months ended March 31, 2001, an increase of $(1,597,000) or 20.1%,
due to the factors discussed above.

Results of Operations - Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 Compared to Nine Months
Ended March 31, 2002

         On June 30, 2003 we decided to  discontinue  the operations of our last
two  operating  businesses,  Aspeon  and  CCI.  Aspeon  ceased  operations  with
immediate effect while CCI completed certain outstanding  customer orders before
ceasing production  operations on August 3, 2003 and its maintenance  operations
on December 31, 2003.

         In December  2003,  we  appointed  attorney  Frank G Blundo Jr. P.C. as
trustee  for an  assignment  for the  benefit of the  Aspeon  and CCI  creditors
commencing effective January 1, 2004. Effective January 1, 2004, all of Aspeon's
and CCI's assets were transferred to the trustee for the benefit of those Aspeon
and CCI creditors who elected to  participate  in the assignment for the benefit
of Aspeon and CCI creditors.  The assets  transferred had a fair market value of
$496,000 and creditors totaling $3.7 million elected to participate and be bound
by the terms of the assignment for the benefit of Aspeon and CCI creditors under

                                       56
<PAGE>

which they no longer had any further claim against Aspeon or CCI. Certain Aspeon
and CCI creditors, totaling in excess of 3.1 million, elected not to participate
in the  assignment  for the benefit of Aspeon and CCI  creditors and remained as
outstanding liabilities of Aspeon and CCI.

         Consequently  from  January  1,  2004 we had no  assets,  no  operating
business or other sources of income.

Revenue.

         Revenue  for the nine  months  ended  March  31,  2002 was  $27,847,000
compared to $50,473,000  for the nine months ended March 31, 2001, a decrease of
$15,426,000  or  45.3%.  Our mix of  products  and  services  sold  was  broadly
unchanged  between  the nine months  ended March 31, 2002 and 2001.  The sale of
products  represented  66.9% of our total revenue in the nine months ended March
31, 2002  compared to 67.5% for the nine months ended March 31, 2001, a negative
variance of 0.6%. Conversely the sale of services represented 33.1% of our total
revenues in the nine months ended March 31, 2002 compared to 32.5% for the three
months  ended  March 31,  2001,  a positive  variance  of 0.6%.  The revenue for
products sold for the nine months ended March 31, 2002 was $18,617,000  compared
to  $34,043,000  for the nine  months  ended  March  31,  2001,  a  decrease  of
$15,426,000  or 45.3%.  The revenue for  services  provided  for the nine months
ended March 31, 2002 was $9,230,000  compared to $16,430,000 for the nine months
ended March 31, 2001, a decrease of $7,200,000 or 43.8%

         The decease in revenues  was due to the industry  wide  slowdown in POS
hardware sales and technology spending as a whole, together with the uncertainty
and loss of  confidence  in the  marketplace  in our  abilities  to support  our
products  arising from the  restatement of our financial  results,  the law suit
brought  against us by  certain  of our  shareholders,  the  resignation  of our
auditors, our de-listing from Nasdaq and our weakened financial position.

Cost of Sales

         Cost of sales for the nine months ended March 31, 2002 was  $24,239,000
compared to $44,943,000  for the nine months ended March 31, 2001, a decrease of
$13,333,000  or 46.1%,  broadly in line with the overall 45.3% decrease in total
revenues.

         The cost of sales for products sold for the nine months ended March 31,
2002 was $15,881,000 compared to $30,751,000 for the nine months ended March 31,
2001,  a decrease of  $14,870,000  or 48.4%  compared  to the 45.3%  decrease in
revenue  from the sale of  products as set out above,  a variance of 3.1%.  This
decrease  of cost of sales as a  percentage  of revenue  for  products  sold was
attributable to increasing inventory reserves in the nine months ended March 31,
2001 on our  inventory of parts for the product  lines to be  discontinued.  The
cost of  services  provided  for the  nine  months  ended  March  31,  2002  was
$8,357,000  compared to $14,192,000  for the nine months ended March 31, 2001, a
decrease of $5,835,000 or 41.1%  compared to the 43.8%  decrease in revenue from
the provision of services as set out above, a variance of 2.7%. Cost of sales as
a percentage of revenue from services provided  increased during the nine months
ended  March 31, 2002 as we entered  into a one  significant  contract  with low
margins in 2000 and had a major  impact on margins in 2002 and our revenue  fell
by more than we were able to reduce our fixed costs of sales for services.

                                       57
<PAGE>

Gross Profit

         Gross profit for the nine months  ended March 31, 2002 was  $3,609,000,
or 13% of revenue,  compared  to  $5,531,000,  or 11% of  revenue,  for the nine
months ended March 31, 2001, a positive  variance of 2%. The gross profit on the
sale of products was $2,736,000,  or 14.7% of revenue, for the nine months ended
March 31, 2002 compared to $3,292,000,  or 9.7% of revenue,  for the nine months
ended  March 31,  2001,  a  positive  variance  of 5%.  The gross  profit on the
provision of services was $873,000 or 9.5% of revenue, for the nine months ended
March 31, 2002 compared to a gross profit of $2,239,000 or 13.6% of revenue, for
the nine months ended March 31, 2001, a negative  variance of 4.1%.  The reasons
for these variances in gross profit are set out above.

Research and Development Expenses

         Research and  development  expenses for the nine months ended March 31,
2002 were  $624,000,  compared to $971,000  for the nine months  ended March 31,
2001,  a decrease of $347,000,  or 35.7%.  As a  percentage  of total  revenues,
research and development  expenses amounted to 2.2% and 1.9% for the nine months
ended March 31, 2001 and 2000  respectively,  an increase of 0.3%. The decreased
expenditure  on  research  and  development   relates  primarily  to  additional
development  costs and activities  relating to the design of new products in the
nine months ended March 31, 2001.

General and Administrative Expenses.

         General and administrative expenses for the nine months ended March 31,
2002 were $6,969,000 compared to $19,056,000 for the nine months ended March 31,
2001, a decrease of  $12,087,000,  or 63.4%.  As a percentage of total revenues,
general  and  administrative  expenses  amounted  to 25% and  37.8% for the nine
months  ended March 31, 2002 and 2001  respectively,  a decrease of 12.8%.  This
decrease  was  primarily  due to the fact that the nine months to March 31, 2001
included  substantial  one off  infrastructure  costs  associated  with  the ASP
service business, higher goodwill amortization costs, severance costs associated
with the  termination of certain  management,  substantial  legal and accounting
fees incurred in connection  with our 2000 audit and pending  litigation and the
loss incurred on the sale of Aspact.  Also adding to the greater  expense was an
increase in  reserves  for  doubtful  accounts  of $1.4  million,  approximately
$750,000 of which related to the ASP services  business,  part of which was sold
in March 2001.





Selling and Marketing Expenses

         Selling and marketing expenses for the nine months ended March 31, 2002
were  $2,251,000,  compared to  $5,331,000  for the nine months  ended March 31,
2001, a decrease of  $3,080,000,  or 57.8%.  As a percentage of total  revenues,
selling and  marketing  expenses  amounted to 8.1% and 10.6% for the nine months
ended March 31, 2002 and 2001  respectively,  a decrease of 2.5%.  The  variance
arose  due to the  fact  that  the  nine  months  to  March  31,  2001  included
substantial one off costs in respect of ASP service sales  infrastructure  costs
while the nine  months  ended March 31,  2002  reflected  the impact of the cost
reduction  programs  introduced  by us to  conserve  cash and attempt to achieve
profitability

Gain on Debt Restructuring

         A gain of $520,000  was  recognized  in the nine months ended March 31,
2002 in respect of the negotiate settlement of certain accounts payable pursuant
to debt  restructuring  agreements.  There were no such gains in the nine months
ended March 31, 2001.

                                       58
<PAGE>

Loss on Sale of Subsidiary

         A loss of  $(7,276,000)  was  recognized in the nine months ended March
31,  2002  in  respect  of  the  sale  of  our  subsidiaries   Javelin  Holdings
International, Ltd., Javelin Systems (Europe) Ltd and Jade Communications,  Ltd.
to an investment  group that included members of the existing UK management team
for  $125,995  and the  repayment of  inter-company  debt.  $750,000 was paid on
signing  with  $175,000  to be  paid  upon  completion  of a  technology  escrow
agreement. There were no such losses in the nine months ended March 31, 2001.

Impairment Charge

         An impairment  charge of $20,031,000  was recognized in the nine months
ended March 31, 2001 largely  relating to the goodwill write off of RCS, DTI and
Monument. No impairment charge was recognized in the nine months ended March 31,
2002.

         Operating Loss.

         An operating  loss of  $(12,992,000)  was recognized in the nine months
ending March 31, 2002  compared to an operating  loss of  $(39,859,000)  for the
nine months ended March 31, 2001, a decrease of  $(26,867,000)  or 67.4%, due to
the factors discussed above.

Interest and Other Income / (Expenses) Net

         Interest  expense  and other  income /  (expenses)  for the nine months
ended  March 31,  2002 was an expense of  $1,707,000  compared  to an expense of
$179,000 for the nine months  ended March 31,  2001,  a variance of  $1,528,000.
This variance was primarily due to other income of $1.2 million  recorded in the
nine  months  ended  March 31,  2001 in respect of the sale of Teneo and DTI and
increased interest expense on our increased indebtedness.

Provision for Income Taxes.

         The provision for income taxes for the nine months ended March 31, 2002
was an expense of $5,000, compared to an expense of $207,000 for the nine months
ended March 31, 2001, a variance of $202,000, or 95.6%, reflecting the impact of
the net losses in the nine months ended March 31, 2002.


Net Loss Before Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change.

         A net loss  before  the  cumulative  effect  of  accounting  change  of
$(14,704,000)  was  recognized in the nine months ending March 31, 2002 compared
to a net loss before the cumulative effect of accounting change of $(40,245,000)
for the nine months ended March 31, 2001, a decrease of $(25,541,000), or 63.5%,
due to the factors discussed above.

Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change

         A cumulative  effect of accounting change of $818,000 was recognized in
the nine months  ended March 31, 2001 in respect of the adoption of SFAS No. 133
(see Note 6 - page 20 above).  No  cumulative  effect of  accounting  change was
recognized in the nine months ended March 31, 2002.

                                       59
<PAGE>

Net Loss After Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change and Comprehensive Loss.

         The net loss for the nine months ended March 31, 2002 was $(14,704,000)
compared to a comprehensive loss of $(12,923,000) a variance of $1,781,000.  The
net loss for the nine months ended March 31, 2001 was $(31,646,000)  compared to
a comprehensive  loss of $(31,696,000) a variance of $50,000.  In both years the
variance related to the change in the cumulative  foreign  currency  translation
adjustment relating to our non-US  subsidiaries in Australia,  Singapore and the
United Kingdom.

Accretion of Manditorily Redeemable Preferred Stock Discount & Dividend

         Accretion  of  manditorily  redeemable  preferred  stock  discount  and
manditorily  redeemable  preferred  stock dividend of $443,000 was recognized in
the nine months ending March 31, 2002 compared to $7,044,000 for the nine months
ended March 31,  2001,  a decrease of  $6,601,000  or 93.7%.  The  variance  was
largely due to our  default  under the terms of the  Preferred  Stock in October
2000  which  required  us to  accrete  the  Preferred  Stock to the  manditorily
redemption  value of $12,313,000.  The basis of the calculation of the accretion
of manditorily  redeemable  preferred stock discount and manditorily  redeemable
preferred stock dividend is set out in Note 12 on page 29 above.

Net Loss Available to Common Stockholders.

         A net loss  available  to  common  stockholders  of  $(15,147,000)  was
recognized in the nine months  ending March 31, 2002  compared to  $(46,472,000)
for the nine months ended March 31, 2001, a decrease of  $(31,325,000) or 67.4%,
due to the factors discussed above.

Cash Flow Information

            As of March 31, 2002, we had $178,000 cash and cash  equivalents  on
hand, a working capital deficit of $ 22.1 million and a shareholders' deficit of
$18.8 million.

         As of June  30,  2006,  we had $7  cash on  hand,  $195 of  assets,  no
operating  business  or other  source  of  income,  outstanding  liabilities  of
approximately  $8.1  million,  a  stockholders'  deficit of  approximately  $8.1
million and a law suit brought against us by certain of our  shareholders  which
had been  ruled in our favor by the  Courts  but  which  could be  subject  to a
further appeal by the shareholders in question.



         We sustained  significant  losses  during the years ended June 30, 2001
and 2000 and had  experienced  negative  cash  flows from  operations  since our
inception.

         In October  2000,  we received a notice of default  from our  Preferred
Stockholders,  which  triggered  certain  payment  requirements  as  well  as  a
Repricing and Redemption Event, as defined in the Preferred Stock Agreement (see
Note 12 - page 28 above).  We were also  delinquent  in the  payments of various
trade payables.  These matters, among others, raised substantial doubt as to our
ability to continue as a going  concern.  Our continued  existence was dependent
upon, among other factors, our ability to return to profitability, the continued
forbearance of the our lenders and creditors,  the successful  renegotiation  of
the terms of our Preferred  Stock,  the outcome of  litigation  filed against us
which  alleged  violations of the federal  securities  laws (Note 17 see page 39
above),  and our ability to raise funds from additional debt and, or, equity. We
had reduced our workforce and planed to further reduce expenditures. we believed
that such reductions,  the securing of a new working capital borrowing facility,

                                       60
<PAGE>

together  with  funds  expected  to  be  generated  from  operations,  would  be
sufficient to meet our expected short-term needs for working capital,  exclusive
of any  obligation to redeem our Preferred  Stock as discussed in Note 12 - page
28 above. However,  there could be no assurance that sufficient cash flows would
be generated by us to avoid the further  depletion of our working capital,  that
we would successfully  renegotiate the terms of our Preferred Stock, or that the
outcome  of the  litigation  would  not have a  material  adverse  impact on our
operations.  Accordingly,  management  intended  to  obtain  additional  debt or
private equity  financing.  There could be no assurance that  additional debt or
equity financing would be available,  if and when needed, or that, if available,
such financing could be completed on commercially favorable terms.

         Subsequently  we were  unable  to  improve  the  profitability  or cash
generation of our operations or to obtain additional debt or equity.  During the
years  ended June 30, 2002 and 2003 we had no  alternative  but to sell or close
down our remaining operating  businesses leaving a substantial short fall to our
creditors.

         Consequently we are now dependent on raising additional equity and, or,
debt to fund any negotiated  settlements with our outstanding creditors and meet
our ongoing  operating  expenses.  There is no assurance that we will be able to
raise  the  necessary  equity  and,  or,  debt  that we will  need to be able to
negotiate  acceptable  settlements  with our  outstanding  creditors or fund our
ongoing operating expenses.

            If we were to be subject to any further  appeal which may be made in
respect of the law suit brought against us by certain of our  shareholders it is
unlikely that the proceeds from our  Directors' and Officers'  insurance  policy
would  be  sufficient  to  meet  the  damages  assessed  and we  would  have  no
alternative but to file for bankruptcy.

         During  the  fiscal  years  ended  June 30,  2006 and 2005,  one of our
directors,  David J Cutler,  advanced to us $115,000 and $88,000 respectively by
way of loan,  bearing interest at 8%, to meet our ongoing operating expenses and
fund the costs of bringing  our  financial  statements  and SEC  reporting up to
date. $14,000 of this loan was converted to equity effective May 31, 2006. Since
June 30, 2006 Mr. Cutler has continued to make further  advances to us by way of
loan to meet our ongoing  operating  expenses and fund the costs of bringing our
financial  statements  and SEC  reporting  up to date as  required.  There is no
assurance  that Mr. Cutler will  continue to provide us with further  funding in
the future.




         It is our current  intention to seek to reach  satisfactory  negotiated
settlements  with our  outstanding  creditors,  vigorously  defend  against  any
further appeal that may be made against our currently  successful defense of the
law suit brought against us by certain of our shareholders,  bring our financial
records  and SEC  filings  up to date,  seek a listing  on the over the  counter
bulletin  board,  raise debt and, or,  equity  financing to fund the  negotiated
settlements  with our  creditors  and to meet  ongoing  operating  expanses  and
attempt  to  merge  with  another   entity  with   experienced   management  and
opportunities  for growth in return  for  shares of our  common  stock to create
value for our  shareholders..  There is no assurance  that this series of events
will be satisfactorily completed

            For  the  nine  months  ended  March  31,  2002,  net  cash  used in
operations was $(664,000)  compared to $(6,949,000)  net cash used in operations
in the nine months ended March 31, 2001, a decrease of $6,285,000, or 90.4%. For
the nine months ended March 31, 2002 the net loss,  adjusted for non-cash items,
was  $(4,135,000)  compared to a the net loss,  adjusted for non-cash  items, of
$(12,328,000)  for  the  nine  months  ended  March  31,  2001,  a  decrease  of
$8,193,000,  or 66.5% due to the decreased level of our operating losses for the
nine months  ended  March 31,  2002 for the  reasons set out above.  In the nine
months  ended  March 31,  2002  changes  in  operating  assets  and  liabilities

                                       61
<PAGE>

generated net cash of $3,471,000 as compared to changes in operating  assets and
liabilities for the nine months ended March 31, 2001 which generated net cash of
$5,379,000,  a variance of  $1,908,000,  or 35.5%,  largely due to an income tax
receivable  of $2.5  million  received in the nine  months  ended March 31, 2001
while no income tax  receivable  was received in the nine months ended March 31,
2002.

            Cash flow used in investing  activities  was $(312,000) for the nine
months  ended March 31, 2002  compared to $904,000  cash  provided by  investing
activities  for the nine months ended March 31, 2001, a variance of  $1,216,000,
or more than 100%.  In the nine months ended March 31, 2002 we used $312,000 for
the purchase of fixed  assets.  This compared to the nine months ended March 31,
2001 where we used $900,000 for the purchase of fixed assets and $427,000 to pay
for businesses we had purchased, offset by $1,025,000 received from the proceeds
of the sale of investments,  $900,000  proceeds  received from the sale of fixed
assets and a net $306,000 from the repayment of advances under notes  receivable
to related parties.

         Cash flow used in financing activities was $233,000 for the nine months
ended March 31, 2002 compared to $(2,165,000)  used in financing  activities for
the nine months  ended March 31, 2001,  a variance of  $1,932,000,  or more than
89,2%. In the nine months ended March 31, 2002 we generated  $1,115,000 from the
conversion of current  obligations to long term debt offset by  $(1,348,000)  in
repayment of our line of credit, notes payable and capital leases. This compared
to the nine months ended March 31, 2000 wher1 we repaid $(1,612,000) of our line
of credit,  notes payable and capital  leases and paid  $(553,000) in respect of
dividends on our Preferred Stock.






PLANNED OPERATIONS

            Our  plan  of   operation  is  to  reach   satisfactory   negotiated
settlements  with our  outstanding  creditors,  vigorously  defend  against  any
further appeal that may be made against our currently  successful defense of the
law suit brought against us by certain of our shareholders,  bring our financial
records  and SEC filings up to date,  obtain debt or equity  finance to meet our
ongoing  operating  expenses,  seek re-listing on the over the counter  bulletin
board and attempt to merge with another entity with  experienced  management and
opportunities  for growth in return  for  shares of our  common  stock to create
value for our  shareholders.  There is can be no  assurance  that this series of
events can be successfully completed,  that any such business will be identified
or that any  stockholder  will  realize any return on their  shares after such a
transaction  has been  completed.  In particular  there is no assurance that any
such business will be located or that any stockholder will realize any return on
their shares after such a transaction. Any merger or acquisition completed by us
can be expected  to have a  significant  dilutive  effect on the  percentage  of
shares  held by our  current  stockholders.  We believe we are an  insignificant
participant  among  the  firms  which  engage  in the  acquisition  of  business
opportunities. There are many established venture capital and financial concerns
that have significantly  greater financial and personnel resources and technical
expertise than we have. In view of our limited  financial  resources and limited
management  availability,  we will continue to be at a  significant  competitive
disadvantage compared to our competitors.

                                       62
<PAGE>

General Business Plan
--------------------------------

         We intend to seek,  investigate  and, if such  investigation  warrants,
acquire an  interest  in business  opportunities  presented  to us by persons or
firms which desire to seek the advantages of an issuer who has complied with the
Securities Act of 1934 (the "1934 Act").  We will not restrict our search to any
specific business,  industry or geographical location, and we may participate in
business  ventures of  virtually  any nature.  This  discussion  of our proposed
business  is  purposefully  general  and is not meant to be  restrictive  of our
virtually  unlimited  discretion to search for and enter into potential business
opportunities.  We  anticipate  that we may be able to  participate  in only one
potential business venture because of our lack of financial resources.

         We may seek a business  opportunity  with entities  which have recently
commenced operations,  or that desire to utilize the public marketplace in order
to raise additional capital in order to expand into new products or markets,  to
develop a new  product  or  service,  or for other  corporate  purposes.  We may
acquire assets and establish wholly owned  subsidiaries in various businesses or
acquire existing businesses as subsidiaries.

         We expect that the selection of a business  opportunity will be complex
and risky.  Due to general economic  conditions,  rapid  technological  advances
being made in some  industries  and shortages of available  capital,  we believe
that there are numerous firms seeking the benefits of an issuer who has complied
with the 1934 Act. Such benefits may include facilitating or improving the terms
on which  additional  equity  financing may be sought,  providing  liquidity for
incentive  stock  options  or  similar  benefits  to  key  employees,  providing
liquidity (subject to restrictions of applicable  statutes) for all stockholders
and other factors.  Potentially,  available business  opportunities may occur in
many different  industries and at various  stages of  development,  all of which
will make the task of  comparative  investigation  and analysis of such business
opportunities  extremely  difficult and complex.  We have,  and will continue to
have,  essentially  no assets to provide the owners of  business  opportunities.
However,  we  will be  able  to  offer  owners  of  acquisition  candidates  the
opportunity  to acquire a  controlling  ownership  interest in an issuer who has
complied  with the 1934 Act  without  incurring  the cost and time  required  to
conduct an initial public offering.

         The analysis of new business  opportunities  will be undertaken  by, or
under the  supervision  of,  our sole  director.  We intend  to  concentrate  on
identifying  preliminary prospective business opportunities which may be brought
to our attention  through  present  associations  of our director,  professional
advisors   or  by  our   stockholders.   In   analyzing   prospective   business
opportunities,  we  will  consider  such  matters  as (i)  available  technical,
financial and managerial  resources;  (ii) working  capital and other  financial
requirements; (iii) history of operations, if any, and prospects for the future;
(iv) nature of present and expected  competition;  (v) quality,  experience  and
depth of management services;  (vi) potential for further research,  development
or exploration;  (vii) specific risk factors not now foreseeable but that may be
anticipated to impact the proposed  activities of the company;  (viii) potential
for growth or expansion;  (ix) potential for profit;  (x) public recognition and
acceptance of products, services or trades; (xi) name identification;  and (xii)
other factors that we consider  relevant.  As part of our  investigation  of the
business  opportunity,  we expect to meet  personally  with  management  and key
personnel.  To the extent  possible,  we intend to utilize  written  reports and
personal investigation to evaluate the above factors.

         We will  not  acquire  or merge  with any  company  for  which  audited
financial statements cannot be obtained within a reasonable period of time after
closing of the proposed transaction.

                                       63
<PAGE>

Acquisition Opportunities
------------------------------------

         In implementing a structure for a particular business  acquisition,  we
may become a party to a merger, consolidation, reorganization, joint venture, or
licensing agreement with another company or entity. We may also acquire stock or
assets of an  existing  business.  Upon  consummation  of a  transaction,  it is
probable  that our  present  management  and  stockholders  will no longer be in
control of us. In addition,  our sole  director may, as part of the terms of the
acquisition transaction,  resign and be replaced by new directors without a vote
of our stockholders, or sell his stock in us. Any such sale will only be made in
compliance  with the  securities  laws of the United  States and any  applicable
state.

         It is anticipated that any securities issued in any such reorganization
would be issued in reliance upon exemption from  registration  under application
federal  and state  securities  laws.  In some  circumstances,  as a  negotiated
element  of the  transaction,  we may  agree to  register  all or a part of such
securities  immediately  after the  transaction  is  consummated or at specified
times  thereafter.  If such  registration  occurs,  it will be undertaken by the
surviving entity after it has  successfully  consummated a merger or acquisition
and is no longer  considered an inactive  company.  The issuance of  substantial
additional securities and their potential sale into any trading market which may
develop  in our  securities  may have a  depressive  effect  on the value of our
securities in the future.  There is no assurance that such a trading market will
develop.

         While the actual  terms of a  transaction  cannot be  predicted,  it is
expected that the parties to any business  transaction will find it desirable to
avoid  the  creation  of a taxable  event and  thereby  structure  the  business
transaction in a so-called "tax-free" reorganization under Sections 368(a)(1) or
351 of the  Internal  Revenue  Code (the  "Code").  In order to obtain  tax-free
treatment  under the Code,  it may be  necessary  for the owner of the  acquired
business to own 80% or more of the voting stock of the surviving entity. In such
event, our stockholders would retain less than 20% of the issued and outstanding
shares of the surviving entity. This would result in significant dilution in the
equity of stockholders.

         As  part of our  investigation,  we  expect  to  meet  personally  with
management  and key personnel,  visit and inspect  material  facilities,  obtain
independent  analysis of verification  of certain  information  provided,  check
references  of  management  and  key  personnel,   and  take  other   reasonable
investigative  measures,  to the extent of our limited  financial  resources and
management expertise.  The manner in which we participate in an opportunity will
depend on the nature of the  opportunity,  the  respective  needs and desires of
both parties, and the management of the opportunity.

         With respect to any merger or acquisition,  and depending  upon,  among
other things, the target company's assets and liabilities, our stockholders will
in all likelihood hold a substantially  lesser percentage  ownership interest in
us following any merger or acquisition.  The percentage ownership may be subject
to  significant  reduction in the event we acquire a target  company with assets
and expectations of growth.  Any merger or acquisition can be expected to have a
significant   dilutive   effect  on  the   percentage  of  shares  held  by  our
stockholders.

         We  will   participate  in  a  business   opportunity  only  after  the
negotiation and execution of appropriate written business  agreements.  Although
the terms of such agreements  cannot be predicted,  generally we anticipate that
such agreements will (i) require specific  representations and warranties by all
of the parties;  (ii) specify certain events of default;  (iii) detail the terms
of closing and the  conditions  which must be  satisfied  by each of the parties
prior to and after such  closing;  (iv)  outline  the  manner of bearing  costs,
including costs associated with the Company's attorneys and accountants; (v) set
forth remedies on defaults; and (vi) include miscellaneous other terms.

                                       64
<PAGE>

         As stated  above,  we will not  acquire or merge with any entity  which
cannot provide  independent  audited  financial  statements  within a reasonable
period of time after closing of the proposed transaction.  We are subject to all
of the  reporting  requirements  included  in the 1934  Act.  Included  in these
requirements as part of a Current Report on Form 8-K,  required to be filed with
the SEC  upon  consummation  of a  merger  or  acquisition,  as well as  audited
financial  statements  included in an Annual Report on Form 10-K (or Form 10-KSB
as  applicable).  If such  audited  financial  statements  are not  available at
closing, or within time parameters necessary to insure our compliance within the
requirements of the 1934 Act, or if the audited financial statements provided do
not conform to the  representations  made by that  business to be acquired,  the
definitive closing documents will provide that the proposed  transaction will be
voidable,  at the discretion of our present  management.  If such transaction is
voided, the definitive closing documents will also contain a provision providing
for reimbursement for our costs associated with the proposed transaction.

Competition
-----------------

         We believe we are an  insignificant  participant  among the firms which
engage in the acquisition of business opportunities.  There are many established
venture capital and financial concerns that have significantly greater financial
and personnel  resources and  technical  expertise  than we have. In view of our
limited  financial  resources  and  limited  management  availability,  we  will
continue  to  be at a  significant  competitive  disadvantage  compared  to  our
competitors.

Accounting  Pronouncements  - In November 2000, the Emerging Task Force ("EITF")
issued EITF 00-27,  "Application of Issue No. 98-5,  "Accounting for Convertible
Conversion  Features or  Contingently  Adjustable  Conversion  Ratios to Certain
Convertible  Instruments".  The  adoption  of this EITF did not have a  material
impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.







         On June 30,  2001,  the FASB  approved  the  issuance  of SFAS No. 141,
Business  Combinations and SFAS No. 142,  Goodwill and Other Intangible  Assets.
SFAS No. 141 states that all business combinations should be accounted for using
the  purchase  method  of  accounting;  use  of  pooling-of-interest  method  is
prohibited.  Accounting for the excess of the fair value of net assets over cost
(negative  goodwill),  will be  allocated  to  certain  assets  first  with  any
remaining excess recognized as an extraordinary  gain. SFAS No. 141 is effective
for business combinations  completed after June 30, 2001. SFAS No. 142 addresses
the  accounting for all purchased  intangible  assets but not the accounting for
internally developed intangible assets. Goodwill will no longer be amortized and
will be reviewed for impairment in accordance  with SFAS No. 142.  Goodwill will
be tested  annually and on an interim basis if an event or  circumstance  occurs
between the annual tests that might reduce the fair value of the reporting  unit
below its carrying  value.  SFAS No 142 is effective for fiscal years  beginning
after  December  31,  2001,   with  early  adoption   permitted   under  certain
circumstances.   Goodwill  and  intangible  assets  acquired  in  a  transaction
completed after June 30, 2001 but before SFAS No. 142 is initially  applied will
be accounted  for in  accordance  with SFAS No. 142. ". The adoption of SFAS No.
141 and SFAS No. 142 did not have a material impact on our consolidated  results
of operations or financial position.

                                       65
<PAGE>

            In June  2001,  the  FASB  approved  for  issuance  SFAS  143  Asset
Retirement  Obligations.   SFAS  143  establishes  accounting  requirements  for
retirement obligations associated with tangible long-lived assets, including (1)
the  timing  of  the  liability  recognition,  (2)  initial  measurement  of the
liability,  (3) allocation of asset  retirement cost to expense,  (4) subsequent
measurement of the liability and (5) financial statement  disclosures.  SFAS 143
requires that an asset retirement cost should be capitalized as part of the cost
of the related  long-lived asset and  subsequently  allocated to expense using a
systematic  and  rational  method.  The  statement is  effective  for  financial
statements  issued for fiscal years  beginning after June 15, 2002. The adoption
of SFAS No. 143 did not have a material  impact on our  consolidated  results of
operations or financial position.

            In October 2001, the FASB also approved SFAS 144, Accounting for the
Impairment  or  Disposal  of  Long-Lived  Assets.  SFAS 144  replaces  SFAS 121,
Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived  Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
Be Disposed Of. The new accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of
by sale applies to all long-lived assets, including discontinued operations, and
replaces  the   provisions  of  APB  Opinion  No.  30,   Reporting   Results  of
Operations-Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, for the
disposal of segments of a business. Statement 144 requires that those long-lived
assets be measured  at the lower of  carrying  amount or fair value less cost to
sell, whether reported in continuing  operations or in discontinued  operations.
Therefore,  discontinued operations will no longer be measured at net realizable
value or  include  amounts  for  operating  losses  that have not yet  occurred.
Statement 144 also broadens the reporting of discontinued  operations to include
all components of an entity with operations that can be  distinguished  from the
rest of the entity and that will be  eliminated  from the ongoing  operations of
the  entity in a disposal  transaction.  The  provisions  of  Statement  144 are
effective  for  financial  statements  issued for fiscal years  beginning  after
December 15, 2001 and, generally, are to be applied prospectively.  The adoption
of SFAS No. 144 did not have a material  impact on our  consolidated  results of
operations or financial position.

            In April  2002,  the  FASB  issued  SFAS  145,  "Rescission  of FASB
Statements No. 4, 44, and 64,  Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical
Corrections."  Among other things, this statement rescinds FASB Statement No. 4,
"Reporting  Gains and Losses from  Extinguishment  of Debt" which  required  all
gains and losses from  extinguishment of debt to be aggregated and, if material,
classified as an  extraordinary  item,  net of related  income tax effect.  As a
result, the criteria in APB Opinion No. 30, "Reporting the Results of Operations
--  Reporting  the  Effects  of  Disposal  of  a  Segment  of  a  Business,  and
Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions," will
now be used to  classify  those  gains and losses.  The  provisions  of SFAS 145
related to the  classification  of debt  extinguishment  are effective for years
beginning  after  May 15,  2002.  The  adoption  of SFAS No.  145 did not have a
material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.

            In July  2002,  the FASB  issued  SFAS  146,  "Accounting  for Costs
Associated with Exit or Disposal  Activities." SFAS 146 provides new guidance on
the  recognition  of costs  associated  with exit or  disposal  activities.  The
standard requires  companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal
activities  when they are incurred  rather than at the date of  commitment to an
exit or disposal plan. SFAS 146 supercedes previous accounting guidance provided
by  the  EITF  Issue  No.  94-3  "Liability  Recognition  for  Certain  Employee
Termination  Benefits  and Other  Costs to Exit an Activity  (including  Certain
Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." EITF Issue No. 94-3 required recognition of
costs at the date of commitment to an exit or disposal  plan.  SFAS 146 is to be
applied  prospectively to exit or disposal  activities  initiated after December
31,  2002.  The  adoption of SFAS No. 146 did not have a material  impact on our
consolidated results of operations or financial position.

            In December 2002, the Financial  Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")
issued  SFAS  148  "Accounting  for  Stock-Based   Compensation--Transition  and
Disclosure--an  amendment of SFAS 123." SFAS 148 provides alternative methods of
transition  for a voluntary  change to the fair value based method of accounting

                                       66
<PAGE>

for stock-based employee  compensation from the intrinsic  value-based method of
accounting  prescribed by APB 25. As allowed by SFAS 123, we elected to continue
to apply the intrinsic  value-based  method of accounting,  and have adopted the
disclosure  requirements  of SFAS 123. We elected not to adopt the provisions of
SFAS 148.

            In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation ("FIN") No. 46,
Consolidation of Variable  Interest  Entities,  which requires variable interest
entities  (commonly  referred  to as SPEs)  to be  consolidated  by the  primary
beneficiary  of the entity if certain  criteria are met. FIN No. 46 is effective
immediately  for all new variable  interest  entities  created or acquired after
January 31, 2003.  The adoption of this statement does not impact our historical
or present financial statements, as we have not created or acquired any variable
interest entities, nor do we expect to in the future.

            In April 2003,  the FASB issued  Statement of  Financial  Accounting
Standard No. 149,  "Amendment  of Statement 133 on  Derivative  Instruments  and
Hedging  Activities"  (SFAS  149).  SFAS  149  amends  and  clarifies  financial
accounting  and  reporting  for  derivative   instruments,   including   certain
derivative instruments embedded in other contracts  (collectively referred to as
derivatives)   and  for  hedging   activities  under  FASB  Statement  No.  133,
"Accounting  for Derivative  Instruments  and Hedging  Activities".  SFAS 149 is
generally  effective for contracts  entered into or modified after June 30, 2003
or hedging  relationships  designated  after June 30, 2003. The adoption of SFAS
No. 149 did not have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations
or financial position.

            In May 2003, the FASB issued Financial  Accounting Standard No. 150,
"Accounting  for Certain  Financial  Instruments  with  Characteristics  of Both
Liabilities  and Equity" (SFAS 150).  SFAS 150  establishes  standards for how a
company   classifies   and   measures   certain   financial   instruments   with
characteristics  of both  liabilities  and equity.  It  requires  that a company
classify a financial  instrument  that is within the scope as a liability (or an
asset in some  circumstances).  SFAS 150 is effective for financial  instruments
entered into or modified  after May 31, 2003,  and otherwise is effective at the
beginning  of the first  interim  period  beginning  after  June 15,  2003.  The
adoption  of SFAS No.  150 did not have a  material  impact on our  consolidated
results of operations or financial position.

            In January,  2004 the  Financial  Accounting  Standards  Board (`the
FASB') issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 132 (revised 2003)
"Employers'  Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement  Benefits",  an
amendment  of FASB  Statements  No.  87,  88,  and 106.  The  Statement  revises
employers'  disclosures  about  pension plans and other  postretirement  benefit
plans.  The  statement  retains the  disclosure  requirements  contained in FASB
Statement No. 132, which it replaces, and requires additional annual disclosures
about the assets,  obligations,  cash flows,  and net  periodic  benefit cost of
defined benefit pension plans and other defined  benefit  postretirement  plans.
Statement No. 132R  requires us to provide  disclosures  in interim  periods for
pensions and other postretirement  benefits. The initial application of SFAS No.
132R will have no impact on our financial statements

            In November 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial  Accounting
Standards  No. 151,  "Inventory  Costs-- an amendment of ARB No. 43,  Chapter 4"
(hereinafter  "SFAS No. 151"). This statement amends the guidance in ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4, "Inventory  Pricing," to clarify the accounting for abnormal  amounts
of  idle  facility  expense,   freight,  handling  costs,  and  wasted  material
(spoilage).  Under some circumstances,  SFAS No. 151 mandates that items such as
idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight, and re-handling costs
be recognized as current-period  charges.  In addition,  this statement requires
that  allocation  of fixed  production  overheads to the costs of  conversion be
based on the normal  capacity of the  production  facilities.  This statement is
effective for inventory  costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June
15,  2005.  We do not  believe  that the  adoption  of SFAS No.  151 will have a
material impact on our financial conditions or results of operation

         In December  2004,  the FASB issued  Statement of Financial  Accounting
Standards No. 152, which amends SFAS Statement No. 66,  "Accounting for Sales of
Real Estate," to reference the financial  accounting and reporting  guidance for
real estate  time-sharing  transactions  that is provided in AICPA  Statement of
Position (SOP) 04-2,  "Accounting  for Real Estate  Time-Sharing  Transactions."

                                       67
<PAGE>

This statement also amends SFAS No. 67, "Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental
Operations  of Real  Estate  Projects,"  to  state  that  the  guidance  for (a)
incidental operations and (b) costs incurred to sell real estate projects,  does
not apply to real estate  time-sharing  transactions.  The  accounting for those
operations  and costs is subject to the guidance in SOP 04-2.  This statement is
effective for financial  statements  for fiscal years  beginning  after June 15,
2005.  We do not believe  that the adoption of SFAS No. 152 will have a material
impact on our financial conditions or results of operation.

         In December  2004,  the FASB issued  Statement of Financial  Accounting
Standards No. 153  (hereinafter  "SFAS No. 153").  This statement  addresses the
measurement of exchanges of nonmonetary  assets. The guidance in APB Opinion No.
29,  "Accounting for Nonmonetary  Transactions,"  is based on the principle that
exchanges of  nonmonetary  assets should be measured  based on the fair value of
the assets exchanged.  The guidance in that opinion,  however,  included certain
exceptions  to that  principle.  SFAS No. 153 amends APB Opinion 29 to eliminate
the  exception  for  nonmonetary  exchanges  of  similar  productive  assets and
replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do
not have commercial  substance.  A nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance
if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a
result of the exchange. This statement is effective for financial statements for
fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for
nonmonetary  asset  exchanges  incurred  during fiscal years beginning after the
date of this  statement  is issued.  We do not believe that the adoption of SFAS
No. 153 will have a material  impact on our  financial  conditions or results of
operation

         In December 2004, the FASB issued a revision to FASB Statement No. 123,
Accounting for Stock Based Compensation.  This Statement  supersedes APB Opinion
No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and its related implementation
guidance.   This  Statement   establishes   standards  for  the  accounting  for
transactions  in which an entity  exchanges its equity  instruments for goods or
services.  It also addresses  transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities
in  exchange  for  goods or  services  that are  based on the fair  value of the
entity's  equity  instruments  or that may be settled by the  issuance  of those
equity  instruments.  . We do not believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 123( R )
will have a material impact on our financial conditions or results of operation

         In March 2005, the FASB Interpretation No.47 "FIN 47" was issued, which
clarifies certain terminology as used in FASB Statement No. 143, "Accounting for
Asset  Retirement  Obligations".  In addition it clarifies  when an entity would
have  sufficient  information to reasonably  estimate the fair value of an asset
retirement obligation. FIN 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal years
ending after December 15, 2005.  Early  adoption of FIN 47 is encouraged.  We do
not  believe  that the  adoption  of FIN 47 will have a  material  impact on our
financial conditions or results of operation.

         In May 2005, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 154, which replaces APB
Opinion No.20 and FASB No. 3. This Statement  provides guidance on the reporting
of  accounting   changes  and  error   corrections.   It   established,   unless
impracticable  retrospective  application as the required method for reporting a
change  in   accounting   principle  in  the  absence  of  explicit   transition
requirements  to a  newly  adopted  accounting  principle.  The  Statement  also
provides guidance when the  retrospective  application for reporting of a change
in accounting  principle is  impracticable.  The reporting of a correction of an
error by restating  previously issued financial  statements is also addressed by
this Statement.  This Statement is effective for financial statements for fiscal
years  beginning after December 15, 2005.  Earlier  application is permitted for
accounting  changes and  corrections  of errors made in fiscal  years  beginning
after the date this Statement is issued.  We do not believe that the adoption of
FASB Statement No. 154 will have a material  impact on our financial  conditions
or results of operation.

         In February  2006,  the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 155, which is an
amendment of FASB  Statements No. 133 and 140. This  Statement;  a) permits fair
value  remeasurement  for any  hybrid  financial  instrument  that  contains  an
embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation, b) clarifies which
interest-only strip and principal-only strip are not subject to the requirements

                                       68
<PAGE>

of  Statement  133,  c)  establishes  a  requirement  to evaluate  interests  in
securitized   financial  assets  to  identify  interest  that  are  freestanding
derivatives or that are hybrid  financial  instruments  that contain an embedded
derivative  requiring  bifurcation,  d) clarifies that  concentrations of credit
risk in the  form of  subordination  are not  embedded  derivatives,  e)  amends
Statement  140 to eliminate  the  prohibition  on a  qualifying  special-purpose
entity  from  holding a  derivative  financial  instrument  that  pertains  to a
beneficial  interest other than another derivative  financial  instrument.  This
Statement is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after
September 15, 2006.  Earlier  adoption of this  Statement is permitted as of the
beginning of an entity's fiscal year, provided the entity has not yet issued any
financial statements for that fiscal year. We does not believe that the adoption
of  FASB  Statement  No.  155  will  have a  material  impact  on our  financial
conditions or results of operation

         In March 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (`FASB') issued
FASB  Statement No. 156,  which amends FASB  Statement  No. 140. This  Statement
establishes,  among other things, that accounting for all separately  recognized
servicing assets and servicing liabilities.  This Statement amends Statement 140
to  require  that all  separately  recognized  servicing  assets  and  servicing
liabilities be initially measured at fair value, if practicable.  This Statement
permits,  but  does  not  require,  the  subsequent  measurement  of  separately
recognized  servicing assets and servicing  liabilities at fair value. An entity
that uses  derivative  instruments  to mitigate the risks  inherent in servicing
assets and  servicing  liabilities  is required to account for those  derivative
instruments at fair value. Under this Statement,  an entity can elect subsequent
fair value measurement to account for its separately recognized servicing assets
and servicing  liabilities.  By electing that option, an entity may simplify its
accounting  because this Statement  permits income statement  recognition of the
potential  offsetting  changes  in fair  value of  those  servicing  assets  and
servicing liabilities and derivative  instruments Is the same accounting period.
This Statement is effective for financial  statements for fiscal years beginning
after September 15, 2006.  Earlier adoption of this Statement is permitted as of
the beginning of an entity's fiscal year, provided the entity has not yet issued
any  financial  statements  for that fiscal  year.  We do not  believe  that the
adoption of FASB Statement No. 156 will have a material  impact on our financial
conditions or results of operation.

Effects of Inflation

         Although we cannot accurately anticipate the effect of inflation on our
operations, we do not believe that inflation has had, or is likely in the future
to have, a material effect on our operating results or financial condition.


ITEM 3.  Controls and Procedures

            As of the end of the period covered by this report,  we conducted an
evaluation,  under  the  supervision  and with the  participation  of our  Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial  Officer,  of our disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as defined in Rules  13a-15(e) and  15d-15(e)  under the 1934 Act).
Based on this  evaluation,  the Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief  Financial
Officer  concluded that our disclosure  controls and procedures are effective to
ensure that  information  required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file
or submit under the 1934 Act is  recorded,  processed,  summarized  and reported
within the time periods  specified  in the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission
rules and forms.  There was no change in our  internal  control  over  financial
reporting during our most recently  completed fiscal quarter that has materially
affected,  or is reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  our internal control
over financial reporting.

PART II     OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

            In October 1999,  we, and two former  officers of DTI, were named as
defendants in a breach of contract and intentional tort action brought by Daniel
Boudwin who claimed rights to computer  software  products once offered for sale

                                       69
<PAGE>

by certain of our subsidiaries. This action was taken in Pennsylvania's Delaware
Court of Common Pleas.  The plaintiff was seeking payment of one-half of all the
sales proceeds of the  commercial  software  product line of "Special  Delivery"
from  February 1997 and made claim to one-half of the asset  purchase  price (as
apportioned to the "Special  Delivery"  asset) paid by us to the shareholders of
DTI in April 1999. We and our  subsidiaries had  indemnification  rights against
one of the selling  shareholders  in  connection  with his  representations  and
warranties made about "Special Delivery" in various  documents.  Although we and
our subsidiaries  supported the selling shareholder's  position as it related to
the  plaintiff  in this  action,  cross-claims  were filed  against  the selling
shareholder,  for  indemnification  and  contribution,  for further  protection.
During 2001 we settled the case by stipulated  judgment and a one off payment of
$65,000 in full and final  settlement of any and all outstanding  liabilities in
respect of this case.











         In October and November 2000,  eight  purported  class action  lawsuits
were  filed  against  us, our Chief  Executive  Officer,  and our  former  Chief
Financial  Officer in the United States District Court for the Central  District
of California  for alleged  violations of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934.
After the  defendants  moved to dismiss each of the actions,  the lawsuits  were
consolidated   under  a  single  action,   entitled  "In  re  Aspeon  Securities
Litigation,"  Case No. SACV 00-995 AHS (ANx),  and the appointed  lead plaintiff
voluntarily filed an amended and consolidated complaint. The defendants moved to
dismiss  that  complaint  and on April  23,  2001  the  Court  entered  an order
dismissing the complaint without  prejudice.  On May 21, 2001 the appointed lead
plaintiff  filed a third  complaint,  styled  as a "First  Amended  Consolidated
Complaint." On June 4, 2001 the  defendants  moved to dismiss this complaint and
on September 17, 2001 the United States  District Court  dismissed the suit with
prejudice and entered judgment in favor of the us and our officers. On September
20,  2001 the lead  plaintiff  in the class  action  suit  appealed  against the
dismissal of the case.  On January 21, 2003 the decision to dismiss the case was
upheld  but  the  lead  plaintiff  was  given  the  opportunity  to  remedy  the
deficiencies  in the complaint that had been filed.  Accordingly on May 30, 2003
the plaintiff filed its "Second Amended Consolidated  Complaint" which again was
subsequently  dismissed  by the  District  Court.  On November 26, 2003 the lead
plaintiff  filed its  "Third  Amended  Consolidated  Complaint"  which was again
dismissed  with  prejudice in March 2004. The lead plaintiff once again appealed
against  the  dismissal  and the United  States  Court of Appeals  for the Ninth
Circuit  affirmed the dismissal with prejudice on February 23, 2006. This is the

                                       70
<PAGE>

fifth  time  that  the  Courts  have  ruled  in  favor  of us  and  against  the
shareholders  who have  brought  this suit  against us. On each of the  previous
occasions the  shareholders  who have brought this suit against us have filed an
appeal  against the decision of the Courts.  There can be no assurance  that the
shareholders  who have  brought  this  suit  against  us will not file a further
appeal  against  the  Courts'  latest  ruling in which case we will  continue to
vigorously defend against the claims.

     In May 2000, we and a distributor  were named as defendants in an action in
the United States  District Court of Middle North  Carolina  brought by a former
customer  of  the  distributor.  In  the  case,  entitled  Performance  Oriented
Solutions, Inc. vs Scansource, Inc., and Javelin Systems, Inc., Case No: 1:00 CV
621 (M.D.N.C.),  the plaintiff  alleged certain  misrepresentations  made by the
defendants,  consequently  resulting in lost profits and incidental  losses.  In
addition,  the plaintiff was seeking punitive  damages.  The case was settled by
Stipulation  of  Voluntary  Dismissal  and a one off payment of $90,000 by us in
full and final  settlement of any and all liabilities  arising in respect of the
case.

         In August 2001, we, together with our Chief Executive Officer,  filed a
six count complaint  against our former  auditors,  PWC,  alleging  professional
negligence,   intentional  interference  with  prospective  business  advantage,
negligent  interference  with  prospective  economic  advantage,   violation  of
California   Business  and  Professions  Code  Sections  17200  and  17500,  and
defamation. In August 2003 we reached an out of court settlement in our law suit
against  PWC.  Under the terms of the  settlement  we received a payment of $1.3
million and agreement to write off certain  outstanding  invoices for accounting
and  legal  fees.  Consequently  we  recognized  a  gain  of  $1,007,000  on the
settlement  although  the net cash we  received  after  all costs  totaled  only
$136,000.

         In December  2003,  we  appointed  attorney  Frank G Blundo Jr. P.C. as
trustee in an  assignment  for the  benefit of the  creditors  of Aspeon and CCI
commencing effective January 1, 2004. Effective January 1, 2004, all of Aspeon's
and CCI's assets were transferred to the trustee for the benefit of those Aspeon
and CCI creditors who elected to  participate  in the assignment for the benefit
of Aspeon and CCI creditors.  The assets  transferred had a fair market value of
$496,000 and creditors totaling $3.7 million elected to participate and be bound
by the terms of the assignment for the benefit of Aspeon and CCI creditors under
which they no longer had any further claim against Aspeon or CCI. Certain Aspeon
and  CCI  creditors,  totaling  in  excess  of  $3.1  million,  elected  not  to
participate  in the  assignment  for the benefit of Aspeon and CCI creditors and
remained as outstanding liabilities of Aspeon and CCI.

Item 2.  Changes in Securities.

         All  details  of  changes  in our  securities  are set out in Note  13.
Shareholders' Equity on page 31 above.

Item 3.  Defaults upon Senior Securities

         All details of our  defaults  in respect of our debt and our  Preferred
Stock are set out in Note.  11 Line of Credit,  Debt & Notes  Payable on page 26
above and Note. 12 Mandatorily  Redeemable  Series A Preferred  Stock on page 28
above.

         We are in default on a number of operating  and capital  leases  either
directly or as guarantor for our subsidiary  companies.  These  liabilities have
been  included  in the  balance  of our  accounts  payable.  We will  attempt to
negotiate  settlement of all of our  shortfalls to creditors in respect of these
defaults upon senior securities.

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to Vote of Security Holders

            No matters were  submitted  by us to a vote of our security  holders
during our fiscal years ended June 30, 2002 through June 30, 2006 or  subsequent
to that date

                                       71
<PAGE>

Item 5.  Other Information.

None

Item 6.  Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.

a.       Exhibits.

     10.1(1)        Form of Indemnity Agreement entered into between the Company
                    and its directors and executive officers.*

     10.1 (12)      Agreement  relating  to the  purchase  of the  whole  of the
                    issued  share  capital  of  Javelin  Holdings  International
                    Limited.

     10.1 (13)      Mutual Release and Settlement  Agreement dated a of March 22
                    between the Company and Castle Creek Technology Partners LLC

     10.1 (14)      Secured Convertible Promissory Note Purchase Agreement dated
                    September  12, 2002  entered into by Aspeon,  Inc.,  Richard
                    Stack, Kenneth Kadlec and Horace Hertz.

     10.2 (14)      Security  dated  September  12, 2002 entered into by Aspeon,
                    Inc., Richard Stack, Kenneth Kadlec and Horace Hertz.

     10.2(1)        1996 Stock Incentive Award Plan (the "1996 Plan").*

     10.3 (14)      Form of  Secured  Convertible  Promissory  Note  payable  by
                    Aspeon,  Inc., to each of Richard Stack,  Kenneth Kadlec and
                    Horace Hertz.

     10.3(1)        Form of Director  Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under
                    the 1996 Plan.*

     10.4(1)        Form of Employee  Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under
                    the 1996 Plan.*

     10.5(6)        1997 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended.*

     10.6(6)        Form of  Incentive  Stock  Option  Agreement  under the 1997
                    Plan.*

     10.7(6)        Form of Nonstatutory  Stock Option  Agreement under the 1997
                    Plan.*

     10.8(1)        Employment  Agreement  dated  August 19, 1996 by and between
                    the Company and Richard P. Stack.*

     10.9(6)        Employment  Agreement  dated  January 1, 1998 by and between
                    CCI Group, Inc. and Robert Nichols.*

     10.10(6)       Standard  Industrial/Commercial  Multi-Tenant Lease-Modified
                    Net dated  January  27,  1998 by and between the Company and
                    BRS-Campo Investment Company LP.

     10.11(1)       Standard  Industrial/Commercial   Single-Tenant  Lease-Gross
                    dated October 19, 1995 by and between the Company and Robert
                    P. Peebles Trust, dated April 11, 1979.

     10.12(2)       Standard Sublease dated September 9, 1997 by and between the
                    Company, D. Howard Lewis and William R. Miller.

                                       72
<PAGE>

     10.13(6)       The Business  Center  Office/Warehouse  Lease dated April 4,
                    1997 by and  between  CCI  Group,  Inc and  Nooney  Krombech
                    Company.

     10.14(2)       Distributor  Agreement  dated  March 14, 1997 by and between
                    the Company and ScanSource, Inc.

     10.15(6)       Loan and Security  Agreement dated June 8, 1998 by and among
                    the Company,  CCI Group,  Inc., Posnet  Computers,  Inc. and
                    Finova Capital  Corporation and related  Secured  Promissory
                    Note,  Pledge  Agreement  and Secured  Continuing  Corporate
                    Guarranty.

     10.16(6)       Form of  Warrant  issued by the  Company  in favor of Finova
                    Capital Corporation.

     10.17(8)       Second and Third  Amendments to Loan and Security  Agreement
                    dated  December 15, 1998 and January 10, 1999,  respectively
                    by and among the Company, CCI Group, Inc., Posnet Computers,
                    Inc. and FINOVA  Capital  Corporation  and related  Security
                    Promissory  Note,  Pledge  Agreement and Secured  Continuing
                    Corporate Guaranty.

     10.18(7)       Stock Purchase Agreement,  dated April 23, 1999 by and among
                    Javelin  Systems,  Inc.,  Dynamic  Technologies,   Inc.,  SB
                    Holdings, Inc., John Biglin, Denise Biglin and John Seitz.

     10.19(9)       1999 Non-Officer Stock Option Plan.*

     10.20(9)       Form of non-qualified  stock option agreement under the 1999
                    Non-Officer Stock Option Plan.*

     10.21(9)       Form of 1999 Plan Stock Option Grant Notice.*

     10.22(10)      Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 7, 2000, by
                    and among the Company,  Aspeon Solutions,  Inc. and Marshall
                    Capital Management, Inc.

     10.23(10)      Warrant to Purchase Common Stock of the Company, dated as of
                    March 8, 2000  issued  by the  Company  in favor of  Marshal
                    Capital Management, Inc.

     10.24(10)      Warrant to Purchase Common Stock of Aspeon  Solutions,  Inc.
                    dated as of March 8, 2000, issued by Aspeon Solutions,  Inc.
                    in favor of Marshall Capital Management, Inc.

     10.25(10)      Registration Rights Agreement,  dated as of March 7, 2000 by
                    and among the Company,  Aspeon  Solutions,  Inc. and Marshal
                    Capital Management, Inc.

     10.26          Sixth  Amendment  and Waiver to Loan and Security  Agreement
                    Between  Aspeon,  Inc.,  CCI Group,  Inc. and Finova Capital
                    Corporation.

     16.1 (11)      Letter from  PricewaterhouseCoopers,  LLP  addressed  to the
                    Securities and Exchange Commission.

     16.1 (16)      Letter from BDO Seidman, LLP addressed to the Securities and
                    Exchange Commission.

     21.1           Subsidiaries

     24.1           Power of Attorney

     27.1           Financial Data Schedule.


                                       73
<PAGE>

 (1)      Filed as an exhibit to the  Company's  Registration  Statement on Form
          SB-2,  as  amended  (No.   333-11217),   and  incorporated  herein  by
          reference.

 (2)      Filed as an exhibit to the Company's  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
          the  fiscal  year  ended  June 30,  1997 and  incorporated  herein  by
          reference.

 (3)      Filed as an exhibit to the Company's  Current Report on Form 8-K dated
          December 30, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference.

 (4)      Filed as an  exhibit  to the  Company's  Current  Report on Form 8-K/A
          dated March 4, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference.

 (5)      Filed as an exhibit to the Company's  Current Report on Form 8-K dated
          January 5, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference.

 (6)      Filed as an exhibit to the Company's  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
          the  fiscal  year  ended  June 30,  1998 and  incorporated  herein  by
          reference.

 (7)      Filed as an exhibit to the Company's  Current Report on Form 8-K filed
          May 3, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference.

 (8)      Filed as an exhibit to the Company's  Quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB
          for the quarter  ended  December 31, 1998 and  incorporated  herein by
          reference.

 (9)      Filed as an exhibit to the Company's  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
          the  fiscal  year  ended  June 30,  1999 and  incorporated  herein  by
          reference.

 (10)     Filed as an exhibit to the Company's  Current Report on Form 8-K dated
          March 9, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference.

(11)      Filed as an exhibit to the Company's  Current Report on Form 8-K dated
          January 21, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference

(12)      Filed as an exhibit to the Company's  Current Report on Form 8-K dated
          April 8, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference

(13)      Filed as an exhibit to the Company's  Current Report on Form 8-K dated
          May 14, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference

(14)      Filed as an exhibit to the Company's  Current Report on Form 8-K dated
          September 27, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference

(15)      Filed as an exhibit to the Company's  Current Report on Form 8-K dated
          February 3, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.

(16)      Filed as an exhibit to the Company's  Current Report on Form 8-K dated
          September 15, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.

                                       74
<PAGE>

(17)      Filed as an  exhibit  to the  Company's  Current  Report on Form 8-K/A
          dated December 9, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.

(18)      Filed as an exhibit to the Company's  Current Report on Form 8-K dated
          March 16, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

(19)      Filed as an exhibit to the Company's  Current Report on Form 8-K dated
          March 28, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference

(20)      Filed as an exhibit to the Company's  Current Report on Form 8-K dated
          May 31, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

       * Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement of the Company.

        b.       Reports on Form 8-K.

         On August 23, 2001 we filed a report on Form 8-K reporting  that we and
our Chief Executive  Officer had filed a six count compliant  against our former
auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

         On September 20, 2001 we filed a report on Form 8-K reporting  that the
United States  District Court had dismissed with prejudice the class action suit
brought  against  us, our Chief  Executive  Officer and former  Chief  Financial
Officer.

         On October 16, 2001 we filed a report on Form 8-K reporting:

         1)    that the  plaintiffs  in the class action suit  previously  filed
               against  us,  our  Chief  Executive   Officer  and  former  Chief
               Financial  Officer,  had  taken an  appeal  from the order of the
               United  States  District  Court  which  dismissed  the suit  with
               prejudice and entered judgment in favor of the registrant and its
               officers, and

         2)    our  unaudited  financial  results for the fiscal year ended June
               30, 2001.

         On November 21, 2001 we filed a report on Form 8-K reporting

         1)    our  unaudited  financial  results  for the  three  months  ended
               September 30, 2001, and

         2)    our  appointment  of Robert D. Nichols as our President and Chief
               Executive Officer.

         On April 8,  2002 we filed a report on Form 8-K  reporting  the sale of
our UK  holding  company,  Javelin  Systems  (Europe)  Ltd.  and its  subsidiary
companies  to an  investment  group which  included  members of the  existing UK
management team.

                                       75
<PAGE>

         On May 14, 2002 we filed a report on Form 8-K  reporting  an  agreement
with the holder of our Preferred Shares to cancel the Preferred Shares, warrants
for  shares of our common  stock and  warrants  for  shares in our wholly  owned
subsidiary company, Aspeon Solutions, in return for a one time cash payment.

         On September 27, 2002 we filed a report on Form 8-K  reporting  that we
had entered into a Secured  Convertible  Promissory Note Purchase Agreement with
three individuals who were directors and officers of us.

         On February 3, 2003 we filed a report on Form 8-K reporting the sale of
our Australian  subsidiary  company,  Aspeon Systems (Asia Pacific) Pty. Ltd, to
Mr. Matthew Maley, general manager of that subsidiary.

         On May 4, 2005 we filed a report on Form 8-K reporting the  appointment
of David J Cutler as our director,  President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer and the resignation of Richard P Stack from those positions.

         On May 11,  2005 we filed a report on Form 8-K  reporting  that David J
Cutler had entered into an agreement with Frank G Blundo, Jr. PC, trustee of the
assignment  for  the  benefit  of  Aspeon  and  CCI  creditors,  subject  to due
diligence,  to invest up to $50,000 cash in us for the benefit of our  creditors
in return for a number of our shares to be determined.

         On September  15, 2005 we filed a report on Form 8-K  appointing  Larry
O'Donnell CPA PC as our independent accountant.

         On  December 9, 2005 we filed a report on Form 8-K/A  appointing  Larry
O'Donnell CPA PC as our independent accountant.

            On March 16, 2006 we filed a report on Form 8-K  appointing  Messrs.
Whiting and Green as two non-executive directors to our board of directors.

            On March 28,  2006 we filed a report on Form 8-K  reporting  that on
February  23,  2006 the United  States  Court of Appeals  for the Ninth  Circuit
affirmed the  dismissal  of the court case brought  against us by certain of our
shareholders with prejudice.

            On March 31, 2006 we filed a report on Form 8-K  reporting  that Mr.
Cutler, one of our directors and our sole officer, converted $14,243 of his loan
to us into 10,536,775  shares of our common stock on the basis of an independent
third party  valuation and with the approval of the majority of our  independent
directors.






                                       76
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

               UNAUDITED & AUDITED EXTRACTS FROM 2002 - 2005 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

                                          ASPEON, INC.
                                   CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                          AS AT JUNE 30

                                                                   2002            2003           2004           2005
                                                                 Unaudited       Audited         Audited       Audited
                ASSETS
<S>                                                           <C>           <C>              <C>           <C>

Current assets

      Cash and cash equivalents                               $     234,900 $          1,500 $           0 $       20,000
      Accounts receivable                                         1,762,800          986,800             0              0
      Inventories                                                   441,800          586,400             0              0
      Prepaid expenses and other current assets                     407,300          233,500         5,600          6,300
                                                                ------------  ---------------  ------------  -------------
                Total current assets                              2,846,800        1,808,200         5,600         26,300

Property and equipment, net                                         577,700          473,200             0              0
Goodwill                                                            500,000                0             0              0
Other assets, net                                                   106,600            5,200             0              0
                                                                ------------  ---------------  ------------  -------------
                Total assets                                  $   4,031,100 $      2,286,600 $       5,600 $       26,300
                                                                ============  ===============  ============  =============

                LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT)

Current liabilities

      Accounts payable                                        $   5,565,700 $     10,780,800 $   6,763,000 $    6,762,600
      Accrued expenses                                            1,289,400          803,300       568,800        569,800
      Current maturities of long-term debt                          827,100          610,400             0              0
      Notes payable                                                       0                0       128,000        216,400
      Purchase price payable for acquisitions                     1,123,900        1,123,900       208,200        208,200
      Customer deposits and unearned income                         786,000          442,400       236,100        236,100
      Income taxes payable                                            9,100                0             0              0
                                                                ------------  ---------------  ------------  -------------
                Total current liabilities                         9,601,200       13,760,800     7,904,100      7,993,100

Long-term debt, net of current portion                            1,690,900                0             0              0
                                                                ------------  ---------------  ------------  -------------
                Total liabilities                                11,292,100       13,760,800     7,904,100      7,993,100

Stockholders' (deficit)

      Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 990,000 shares authorized (1,000,000
      authotized net of 10,000 designated as mandatorily redeemable stock);
      no shares issued and outstanding                                    0                0             0              0
      Common Stock, $0.01 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized
      9,436,225 issued and outstanding                               94,400           94,400        94,400         94,400
      Additional paid in capital                                 84,938,400       84,938,400    84,938,400     84,938,400
      Treasury stock                                                (60,000)         (60,000)      (60,000)       (60,000)
      Accumulated deficit                                       (92,618,900)     (96,518,900)  (92,943,200)   (93,011,500)
      Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) / profit               385,100           71,900        71,900         71,900
                                                                ------------  ---------------  ------------  -------------
                Total  stockholders' equity / (deficit)          (7,261,000)     (11,474,200)   (7,898,500)    (7,966,800)
                                                                ------------  ---------------  ------------  -------------
                Total liabilities and stockholders' (deficit) $   4,031,100 $      2,286,600 $       5,600 $       26,300
                                                                ============  ===============  ============  =============
</TABLE>



                                       77
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                       UNAUDITED & AUDITED EXTRACTS FROM 2002 - 2005 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

                                                  ASPEON, INC.
                                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                       FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30

                                                            2002             2003             2004             2005
                                                        Unaudited        Unaudited          Audited           Audited
<S>                                                   <C>              <C>              <C>               <C>

Revenues
      Products                                        $   22,131,700   $   10,749,100   $      457,800    $           0
      Services                                            10,406,600        2,476,000          407,700                0
                                                        -------------    -------------    -------------     ------------
Total revenues                                            32,538,300       13,225,100          865,500                0

Cost of revenues
      Products                                            19,173,100        8,345,500          708,700                0
      Services                                             9,622,200        1,331,400          139,400                0
                                                        -------------    -------------    -------------     ------------
Total cost of revenues                                    28,795,300        9,676,900          848,100                0
                                                        -------------    -------------    -------------     ------------
Gross profit                                               3,743,000        3,548,200           17,400                0

Operating expenses
      Research and development                               779,300          503,200                0                0
      Selling and marketing                                2,550,300          789,300           13,400                0
      General and administrative                           9,704,800        4,412,700          604,600           67,200
      Impairment charge                                   12,874,100        1,850,900                0                0
      Gain on settlement of litigation                             0                0       (1,007,200)               0
      Gain on assignment for the benefit of creditors              0                0       (3,173,100)               0
                                                        -------------    -------------    -------------     ------------
Total operating expenses                                  25,908,500        7,556,100       (3,562,300)          67,200

Income / (loss) from operations                          (22,165,500)      (4,007,900)       3,579,700          (67,200)

Interest and Other Income / (Expenses) Net                (1,048,700)         107,800           (4,100)          (1,000)
                                                        -------------    -------------    -------------     ------------
Income (loss) before income tax and                      (23,214,200)      (3,900,100)       3,575,600          (68,200)
cumulative effect of accounting change

Income tax (expense) / benefit                                (1,800)             100                0                0
                                                        -------------    -------------    -------------     ------------
Net  income / (loss)                                     (23,216,000)      (3,900,000)       3,575,600          (68,200)

Accretion of mandatorily redeemable                         (441,600)               0                0                0
Series A Preferred stock discounts and dividends
                                                        -------------    -------------    -------------     ------------
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders    $  (23,657,600)  $   (3,900,000)  $    3,575,600    $     (68,200)
                                                        =============    =============    =============     ============

Basic and Dilured income (loss) per share:

      Basic and Diluted                               $        (2.51)  $        (0.41)  $         0.38    $       (0.01)
                                                        =============    =============    =============     ============

Shares used in computing income (loss) per common share:

      Basic and Diluted                                    9,436,225        9,436,225        9,436,225        9,436,225
                                                        =============    =============    =============     ============
</TABLE>


                                       78
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                       UNAUDITED & AUDITED EXTRACTS FROM 2002 - 2005 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

                                                  ASPEON, INC.
                               CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT)

                                        Common Stock        Additional                             Accumulated
                                                            Paid - in     Treasury   Accumulated  Comprehensive
                                     Shares      Amount      Capital       Stock      Deficit        Loss          Total

                                       #            $           $            $           $             $             $
<S>                                <C>        <C>         <C>          <C>         <C>           <C>          <C>
Balance, June 30, 2001 - audited   94,316,225      94,400   65,143,600     (60,000)  (68,961,300)  (1,602,400)   (5,385,700)

Accretion of manditory redeemable                                                       (441,600)                  (441,600)
stock discount and dividends

Comprehensive (loss)                                                                 (23,216,000)   1,987,500   (21,228,500)

Forgiveness of Deferred Earnouts                               741,000                                              741,000

Cancellation of Preferred Stock                             15,627,200                                           15,627,200

Cancellation of Warrants                                     3,426,600                                            3,426,600
                                   -----------  ----------  -----------  ---------- ------------- ------------  ------------
Balance, June 30 2002 - unaudited  94,316,225      94,400   84,938,400     (60,000)  (92,618,900)     385,100    (7,261,000)

Comprehensive (Loss)                                                                  (3,900,000)    (313,200)   (4,213,200)
                                   -----------  ----------  -----------  ---------- ------------- ------------  ------------
Balance, June 30 2003 - audited    94,316,225      94,400   84,938,400     (60,000)$ (96,518,900)$     71,900 $ (11,474,200)

Comprehensive Profit                                                                   3,575,600                  3,575,600
                                   -----------  ----------  -----------  ---------- ------------- ------------  ------------
Balance, June 30 2004 - audited    94,316,225      94,400   84,938,400    (120,000)$ (92,943,300)$     71,900 $  (7,898,600)

Comprehensive (Loss)                                                                     (68,200)                   (68,200)
                                   -----------  ----------  -----------  ---------- ------------- ------------  ------------
Balance, June 30 2005 - audited    94,316,225 $    94,400 $ 84,938,400 $  (240,000)$ (93,011,500)$     71,900 $  (7,966,800)
                                   ===========  ==========  ===========  ========== ============= ============  ============
</TABLE>






                                       79
<PAGE>

SIGNATURES

         In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.


                                    ASPEON, INC,
                                    (Registrant)




Date: September 22, 2006            /s/     David J. Cutler
------------------------            -------------------------------------
                                    David J. Cutler,
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    Chief Financial Officer.



                                       80