alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §57504. Charter or sale of vessels acquired by Department of Transportation

Vessels transferred to or otherwise acquired by the Department of Transportation in any manner may be chartered or sold by the Secretary of Transportation as provided in this chapter.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1665.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 57504 | 46 App.:1194. | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title VII, §704, 49 Stat. 2008; Apr. 1, 1937, ch. 64, 50 Stat. 57; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(106), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 163. |

Section
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 11

                Statement Re:  Computation of Earnings Per Share


<TABLE>
                                               Three Months        Three Months
                                                  Ended               Ended
                                                 April 1,           March 26,
                                                   2001               2000
                                               ------------        ------------
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
<S>                                            <C>                 <C>
Average shares outstanding - Basic                 4,324               5,290

Shares issuable upon the exercise of
  Outstanding stock options and warrants               3                  22
                                                  ------              ------

Weighted average shares outstanding - Diluted      4,327               5,312
                                                  ======              ======


Net income                                        $  849              $1,206
                                                  ======              ======

Basic earnings per share                          $ 0.20              $ 0.23
                                                  ======              ======

Diluted earnings per share                        $ 0.20              $ 0.23
                                                  ======              ======
</TABLE>
### §7615. Separability

If any provision of this chapter, or the application of any provision of this chapter to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances, and the remainder of this chapter shall not be affected thereby.

(July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title III, §315, formerly §12, as added Pub. L. 88–206, §1, Dec. 17, 1963, 77 Stat. 401; renumbered §305, Pub. L. 89–272, title I, §101(4), Oct. 20, 1965, 79 Stat. 992; renumbered §308 and amended, Pub. L. 90–148, §2, Nov. 21, 1967, 81 Stat. 506; renumbered §315, Pub. L. 91–604, §12(a), Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1705.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1857k of this title.

#### Amendments

1967—Pub. L. 90–148 reenacted section without change.
### §1542. Voting franchise; discrimination prohibited

(a) The franchise shall be vested in residents of the Virgin Islands who are citizens of the United States, twenty-one years of age or over. Additional qualifications may be prescribed by the legislature: Provided, however, That no property, language, or income qualification shall ever be imposed upon or required of any voter, nor shall any discrimination in qualification be made or based upon difference in race, color, sex, or religious belief.

(b) The legislature shall have authority to enact legislation establishing the voting age for residents of the Virgin Islands at an age not lower than eighteen years of age, if a majority of the qualified voters in the Virgin Islands approve in a referendum election held for that purpose.

(July 22, 1954, ch. 558, §4, 68 Stat. 498; Pub. L. 91–460, Oct. 16, 1970, 84 Stat. 978.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1970—Pub. L. 91–460 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).
### §8107. Use of force against piracy

(a) Limitation on Liability.—An owner, operator, time charterer, master, mariner, or individual who uses force or authorizes the use of force to defend a vessel of the United States against an act of piracy shall not be liable for monetary damages for any injury or death caused by such force to any person engaging in an act of piracy if such force was in accordance with standard rules for the use of force in self-defense of vessels prescribed by the Secretary.

(b) Promotion of Coordinated Action.—To carry out the purpose of this section, the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall work through the International Maritime Organization to establish agreements to promote coordinated action among flag- and port-states to deter, protect against, and rapidly respond to piracy against the vessels of, and in the waters under the jurisdiction of, those nations, and to ensure limitations on liability similar to those established by subsection (a).

(c) Definition.—For the purpose of this section, the term "act of piracy" means any act of aggression, search, restraint, depredation, or seizure attempted against a vessel of the United States by an individual not authorized by the United States, a foreign government, or an international organization recognized by the United States to enforce law on the high seas.

(Added Pub. L. 111–281, title IX, §912(a), Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 3016.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Standard Rules for the Use of Force for Self-Defense of Vessels of the United States

Pub. L. 111–281, title IX, §912(c), Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 3017, provided that: "Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this act [Oct. 15, 2010], the secretary [sic] of the department in which the coast guard [sic] is operating, in consultation with representatives of industry and labor, shall develop standard rules for the use of force for self-defense of vessels of the United States."
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q
(the report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a14(b) or Rule 15d14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Ray C. Dillon, the Chief Executive Officer, and Kenneth D. Mann, the Chief Financial Officer, each certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Deltic Timber Corporation.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Ray C. DillonRay C. DillonChief Executive OfficerNovember 5, 2009/s/ Kenneth D. MannKenneth D. MannChief Financial OfficerNovember 5, 2009
Exhibit 32.1













CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ZAGG Incorporated (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Robert G. Pedersen II, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ROBERT G. PEDERSEN IIRobert G. Pedersen II

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

March 15, 2010




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §1508. Application to District of Columbia

Aliens shall have the same rights and privileges concerning the acquisition, holding, owning, and disposition of real estate in the District of Columbia as are conferred upon aliens in respect of real estate in the Territories of the United States by this chapter.

(Feb. 23, 1905, ch. 733, §1, 33 Stat. 733.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 78 of Title 8, Aliens and Nationality.

Section was not enacted as part of act Mar. 3, 1887, ch. 340, 24 Stat. 476, which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeals

Act Feb. 23, 1905, ch. 733, §2, 33 Stat. 733, repealed all laws and parts of laws so far as they conflict with the provisions of this section.
### §10317. Loss of lien and right to wages

A master or seaman by any agreement other than one provided for in this chapter may not forfeit the master's or seaman's lien on the vessel or be deprived of a remedy to which the master or seaman otherwise would be entitled for the recovery of wages. A stipulation in an agreement inconsistent with this chapter, or a stipulation by which a seaman consents to abandon a right to wages if the vessel is lost, or to abandon a right the seaman may have or obtain in the nature of salvage, is void.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 568.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 10317 | 46:600 |

Section 10317 prohibits a master or seaman from entering into an agreement which forfeits his or her lien on the vessel or other remedy for recovery of wages, and renders such agreements void.
#### § 27.123 Deficiency judgment.

If the price at which the security property is sold at the foreclosure sale is less than the unpaid balance of the debt secured by such property after disposition of sale proceeds in accordance with the order of priority provided under the Statute, the Secretary may refer the matter to the Attorney General who may commence an action or actions against any and all debtors to recover the deficiency, unless such an action is specifically prohibited by the mortgage.
§ 93.100 Participation and submission requirements. ( a ) *Notification of intent to participate.* Not later than 30 calendar days after HUD's publication of the formula allocation amounts as provided in § 93.53, the State must notify HUD in writing of its intention to become an HTF grantee for the first year of HTF funding.
( b ) *Submission requirement.* To receive its HTF grant, the grantee must submit a consolidated plan in accordance with 24 CFR part 91.
#### Dedge *v.*Bennett *et al.*

Lumpkin, J.

1. Under section 6038 of the Civil Code, which makes provision for judgment creditors to redeem property held under a security deed, or where the purchase-money has not been fully paid, and for the subjection of such property to the judgments, the deed of reconveyance should be made to the defendant in fi. fa. by the vendor or holder of the title as security; “and when such conveyance has been filed and recorded, the said property may be levied on and sold as the property of the defendant.” Thus by the express terms of the statute it is declared that the conveyance must be filed and recorded before the levy can be made. The right to redeem and subject the property, being one conferred by statute, must be exercised upon statutory conditions.

2. Where, under the provisions of section 6038 of the Civil Code, judgment creditors sought to redeem land which had been previously conveyed by the debtor to secure a debt, and to subject such property to their executions, but caused levies to be made before the deed of reconveyance had been recorded, even if this were done after it had been filed, the levy and sheriff’s sale would be void. *National Bank*v. *Danforth,*80 *Ga.*55 (5), 56 (7 S. E. 546).

3. Section 3320 of the Civil Code deals with the registration of deeds, mortgages, etc., the notice arising therefrom, and the priority resulting in a competition between deeds or liens. It does not affect the statutory method provided for redeeming land of a judgment debtor and subjecting it to the judgment.

4. Erom the preceding headnotes it follows that it was error to refuse to restrain the execution of the deed by the sheriff under the sale based *788upon a levy made before tbe deed of reconveyance yas recorded, and the carrying into effect of such sale by dispossession of the debtor.

October 16, 1912.

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Conyers. Appling superior court. May 20, 1912.

*Pwriter & Highsmith,*for plaintiff.,

*W. W. Bennett,*for defendants.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concw.*
### Geology of Precambrian rocks, Idaho Springs district, Colorado

By: R. H. Moench

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1182A

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000064222-JAN-201308:00 AM
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 28, 2018

t0927

Order 

Clerk

September 28, 2018

157092

JERMAINE HARRIS, Personal Representative

of the Estate of ANNIE RUTH FLIE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 157092

COA: 333389 

Wayne CC: 14-006622-NH

OAKWOOD HEALTHCARE, INC., d/b/a 

OAKWOOD HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER,

ANAND HIREMATH, M.D., LUNINGNING V.

REGALADO, M.D., NORMITA VICENCIO,

M.D., PC, WILLIAM I. MICHELS, III, D.O., and

DEARBORN FAMILY CLINIC, PC,

Defendants, 

and

JOSEPH C. FINCH, D.O., and JOSEPH C.

FINCH, D.O., PC,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 12, 2017 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
### §70304. Travel advisories on security at foreign ports

(a) General Requirements.—On being notified by the Secretary that the Secretary has determined that a condition exists that threatens the safety or security of passengers, passenger vessels, or crew traveling to or from a foreign port that the Secretary has determined under section 70303(b) of this title does not maintain and administer effective security measures, the Secretary of State immediately shall issue a travel advisory for that port. The Secretary of State shall take the necessary steps to widely publicize the travel advisory.

(b) Lifting Advisories.—A travel advisory issued under subsection (a) may be lifted only if the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of State, has determined that effective security measures are maintained and administered at the port.

(c) Notice to Congress.—The Secretary of State shall notify Congress immediately of any change in the status of a travel advisory issued under this section.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §10(2), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1684.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 70304 | 46 App.:1804. | Pub. L. 99–399, title IX, §908, Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 891; Pub. L. 105–277, div. G, title XXII, §2224(b), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–819. |

Section

In subsection (b), the words "with respect to which the Secretary of Transportation had made the determination described in section 1803(d) of this Appendix" are omitted as unnecessary.
### §§1317 to 1319. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 1317 to 1319 were omitted as not of general application, and as covered by the Canal Zone Code. The Canal Zone Code was subsequently redesignated the Panama Canal Code by Pub. L. 96–70, §3303(b), and repealed by Pub. L. 104–201, §3549.

Section 1317, acts June 15, 1914, ch. 106, §2, 38 Stat. 386; June 19, 1934, ch. 667, §1, 48 Stat. 1122, related to reservation of right to discriminate in favor of American vessels.

Section 1318, acts Aug. 24, 1912, ch. 390, §5, 37 Stat. 562; Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 370, §10, 42 Stat. 1008; July 5, 1932, ch. 425, 47 Stat. 578; June 19, 1934, ch. 667, §1, 48 Stat. 1122, related to regulations governing the operation of the Canal.

Section 1319, acts Aug. 24, 1912, ch. 390, §5, 37 Stat. 562; June 15, 1914, ch. 106, §1, 38 Stat. 385; June 19, 1934, ch. 667, §1, 48 Stat. 1122; June 13, 1940, ch. 358, §1, 54 Stat. 387; Sept. 26, 1950, ch. 1049, §3, 64 Stat. 1039, related to injuries to vessels, cargo, crew, or passengers in operation of Canal.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001021444
<NAME>                        THINKING TOOLS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         13
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               34
<PP&E>                                         29
<DEPRECIATION>                                 21
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1223
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       5
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1199)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   34
<SALES>                                        79
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               79
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  348
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             229
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (498)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (498)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (498)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.10)



</TABLE>
#### Gertrude Goodrich et al., Respondents, v. U. S. Trucking Corporation et al., Appellants.

Motion by respondents to dismiss appeal denied, on condition that appellants perfect the appeal and be ready to argue or submit it at *488the December Term, commencing November 28, 1960. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
#### PEOPLE, Appellant, v. BREWSTER et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 15, 1905.)

Proceedings by the people of the state of New York against John H. Brewster and another. No opinion. Appeal dismissed, without costs, on stipulation.
### §6304. Subpoena authority

(a) In an investigation under this chapter, the attendance and testimony of witnesses, including parties in interest, and the production of any evidence may be compelled by subpoena. The subpoena authority granted by this section is coextensive with that of a district court of the United States, in civil matters, for the district in which the investigation is conducted.

(b) When a person fails to obey a subpoena issued under this section, the district court of the United States for the district in which the investigation is conducted or in which the person failing to obey is found, shall on proper application issue an order directing that person to comply with the subpoena. The court may punish as contempt any disobedience of its order.

(c) A witness complying with a subpoena issued under this section may be paid for actual travel and attendance at the rate provided for witnesses in the district courts of the United States.

(d) An official designated to conduct an investigation under this part may issue subpoenas as provided in this section and administer oaths to witnesses.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 538; Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXVIII, §11807(a), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 4165.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 6304 | 46:239(e)46:239(f) |

46:239(f)

Section 6304 provides an officer investigating a marine casualty with the necessary subpena authority to require the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of evidence. It also authorizes a district court of the United States to direct compliance with a subpena.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–263 substituted "subpoena" for "subpena" wherever appearing in text, "subpoenas" for "subpenas" in subsec. (d), and, to reflect the probable intent of Congress, "Subpoena" for "Subpena" in section catchline.