alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION I, Robert E. Swanson, certify that:  1.
	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Ridgewood Energy L Fund, LLC;2.
	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
	The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter
in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5.
	The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Dated:
	
	March 30, 2007/s/
	
	ROBERT E. SWANSONName:
	
	Robert E. SwansonTitle:
	
	President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
§ 248.175 Resident homeownership program—limited equity cooperative. ( a ) Tenants may carry out a resident homeownership program through the purchase of eligible low income housing by a limited equity cooperative and the operation of the project as a limited equity cooperative.
( b ) The purchase of a project by a limited equity cooperative and the operation of the project by the limited equity cooperative shall be carried out in accordance with the provisions of § 248.173 (a), (b), (c), (d), (except that paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section shall include a statement of the amount and type of incentives requested, rather than only the amount of grant funds requested), (e), (g)(3), (i) (except paragraphs (i)(1) and (3)), (m) and (n).
( c ) The purchase and operation of eligible low income housing by a limited equity cooperative under this section shall be carried out in accordance with all provisions of subpart B of this part otherwise, applicable to the transfer and operation of a project with continued low income affordability restrictions, except as provided in this section.
[57 FR 12041, Apr. 8, 1992, as amended at 58 FR 37816, July 13, 1993]
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 132816 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 132816 

 COA: 273381 

Jackson CC: 05-001316-FH 

BRYAN ALLEN CARY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 31, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal to explore the issues presented by the 

Department of Corrections’ handling of sentencing credit for the reasons set forth in her 

dissenting statement in People v Conway, 474 Mich 1140 (2006). 

MARKMAN, J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in his 

dissenting statement in People v Wright, 474 Mich 1138 (2006). 

d0416 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 24, 2007 

 Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 230 (Monday, November 30, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 76651]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26294]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

[Docket No. SSA-2020-0060]


Notice Announcing Addresses for Service of Process

AGENCY: Social Security Administration.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We published notices in the Federal Register on October 28, 
2019, March 2, 2020, and August 27, 2020, which announced the addresses 
for service of process. These documents contained the incorrect suite 
number in the address for the Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, 
Region VI, Social Security Administration. We are correcting the suite 
number in this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Haar, Office of the General 
Counsel, Office of Program Law, Social Security Administration, 6401 
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235-6404, (410) 965-2521. For 
information on eligibility or filing for benefits, call our national 
toll-free number, 1-800-772-1213 or TTY 1-800-325-0778, or visit our 
internet site, Social Security Online, at http://www.socialsecurity.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the Federal Register of October 28, 2019 in FR Doc. 2019-23478, 
on page 57801, in the second column, correct the address for the Office 
of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region VI, Social Security 
Administration to 1301 Young Street, Ste. 350, Mailroom 104, Dallas, TX 
75202-5433.
    In the Federal Register of March 2, 2020 in FR Doc. 2020-04246, on 
page 12373, in the first column, correct the address for the Office of 
the Regional Chief Counsel, Region VI, Social Security Administration 
to 1301 Young Street, Ste. 350, Mailroom 104, Dallas, TX 75202-5433.
    In the Federal Register of August 27, 2020 in FR Doc. 2020-18898, 
on page 53059, in the third column, correct the address for the Office 
of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region VI, Social Security 
Administration to 1301 Young Street, Ste. 350, Mailroom 104, Dallas, TX 
75202-5433.
    The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Andrew 
Saul, having reviewed and approved this document, is delegating the 
authority to electronically sign this document to Faye I. Lipsky, who 
is the primary Federal Register Liaison for SSA, for purposes of 
publication in the Federal Register.

Faye I. Lipsky,
Federal Register Liaison, Office of Legislation and Congressional 
Affairs, Social Security Administration.
[FR Doc. 2020-26294 Filed 11-27-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191-02-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

OP 22-0184 

MICHAEL DUNNE, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

JIM SALMONSEN, 

Respondent, 

GRANT OF MOTION TO 

PROCEED WITHOUT 

PAYMENT OF FILING FEE 

Motion to proceed without payment of the filing fee in this matter is 

GRANTED. 

DATED: April 14, 2022. 

BOWEN GREENWOOD 

Clerk of the Supreme Court
§ 570.607 Employment and contracting opportunities. To the extent that they are otherwise applicable, grantees shall comply with: ( a ) Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Orders 11375, 11478, *12086,* and 12107 (3 CFR 1964-1965 Comp. p. 339; 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 684; 3 CFR, 1966-1970., p. 803; 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 230; 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 264 (Equal Employment Opportunity), and Executive Order 13279 (Equal Protection of the Laws for Faith-Based and Community Organizations), 67 FR 77141, 3 CFR, 2002 Comp., p. 258; and the implementing regulations at 41 CFR chapter 60; and
( b ) Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 (12 U.S.C. 1701u) and implementing regulations at 24 CFR part 75.
[68 FR 56405, Sept. 30, 2003, as amended at 85 FR 61567, Sept. 29, 2020]
#### Morris Kominsky, administrator, plaintiff in error, v. Morris L. Arkin, defendant in error.

Gen. No. 27,812.

Suit for personal injuries followed by death. Judgment for defendant. Error to the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Marcus Kavanagh, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1922.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed October 17, 1923.

Jerome J. Cermak and Alvin E. Stein, for plaintiff in error; Jacob G. Grossberg, of counsel. Charles S. Dougherty, for defendant in error; John E. Hogan, of counsel.

Mr. Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 09-3517

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Arkansas.

Bobby Dale Walker, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: February 14, 2011

Filed: February 28, 2011

___________

Before RILEY, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Bobby Dale Walker pleaded guilty to violating 18 U.S.C. § 2250 based on his

failure to register as a sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration and

Notification Act (SORNA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 16901-16991. The district court sentenced 1

him to a term of thirty months of imprisonment. Walker entered a conditional plea

which preserved his right to bring this appeal. He argues the criminalstatute (§ 2250)

and § 113 of the SORNA (42 U.S.C. § 16913) violate the commerce clause of the

The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the

1

Western District of Arkansas.
United States Constitution because they have an insufficient nexus to the regulation

of interstate commerce.

Walker's argument (which he acknowledges raising solely for the purpose of

preserving the issue for potential further review) isforeclosed in this circuit by United

States v. May, 535 F.3d 912, 922 (8th Cir. 2008) (holding that § 2250 is an

appropriate exercise of Congress's power to regulate the use of the channels of

interstate commerce) and United States v. Howell, 552 F.3d 709, 715 (8th Cir. 2009)

("[A]n analysis of § 16913 under the broad authority granted to Congress through

both the commerce clause and the enabling necessary and proper clause reveals the

statute is constitutionally authorized."). See also United States v. Reynolds, 116 F.3d

328, 329 (8th Cir. 1997) ("One panel may not overrule another.").

We therefore affirm the judgment of conviction and sentence.

______________________________

-2-
### §30704. Loading, stowage, custody, care, and delivery

A carrier may not insert in a bill of lading or shipping document a provision avoiding its liability for loss or damage arising from negligence or fault in loading, stowage, custody, care, or proper delivery. Any such provision is void.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §6(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1516.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30704 | 46 App.:190. | Feb. 13, 1893, ch. 105, §1, 27 Stat. 445. |

Section

The words "transporting merchandise or property from or between ports of the United States and foreign ports" are omitted because of section 30702(a) of the revised title. The words "may not" are substituted for "It shall not be lawful . . . to", and the word "provision" is substituted for "clause, covenant, or agreement", to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "any and all lawful" and "committed to its or their charge" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "Any such provision is void" are substituted for "Any and all words or clauses of such import inserted in bills of lading or shipping receipts shall be null and void and of no effect" to eliminate unnecessary words.
§ 9.131 Direct threat. ( a ) This part does not require the agency to permit an individual to participate in, or benefit from the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages and accommodations of that agency when that individual poses a direct threat to the health or safety of others.
( b ) “Direct threat” means a significant risk to the health or safety of others that cannot be eliminated by a modification of policies, practices, or procedures, or by the provision of auxiliary aids or services.
( c ) In determining whether an individual poses a direct threat to the health or safety of others, the agency must make an individualized assessment, based on reasonable judgment that relies on current medical knowledge or on the best available objective evidence to ascertain: the nature, duration, and severity of the risk; the probability that the potential injury will actually occur; and whether reasonable modifications of policies, practices, or procedures will mitigate the risk.
§ 1006.120 May we grant an exception to let an excluded person participate in a covered transaction? ( a ) The Inter-American Foundation Debarring Official may grant an exception permitting an excluded person to participate in a particular covered transaction. If the Inter-American Foundation Debarring Official grants an exception, the exception must be in writing and state the reason(s) for deviating from the governmentwide policy in Executive Order 12549.
( b ) An exception granted by one agency for an excluded person does not extend to the covered transactions of another agency.
### §4343. Employment of personnel, experts and consultants

(a) The Council may employ such officers and employees as may be necessary to carry out its functions under this chapter. In addition, the Council may employ and fix the compensation of such experts and consultants as may be necessary for the carrying out of its functions under this chapter, in accordance with section 3109 of title 5 (but without regard to the last sentence thereof).

(b) Notwithstanding section 1342 of title 31, the Council may accept and employ voluntary and uncompensated services in furtherance of the purposes of the Council.

(Pub. L. 91–190, title II, §203, Jan. 1, 1970, 83 Stat. 855; Pub. L. 94–52, §2, July 3, 1975, 89 Stat. 258.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The last sentence of section 3109 of title 5, referred to in subsec. (a), probably means the last sentence of section 3109(b) of title 5, which was the last sentence of that section when the reference was enacted. Since then, section 3109 of title 5 has been amended to add subsecs. (c) to (e) at the end.

#### Codification

In subsec. (b), "section 1342 of title 31" substituted for "section 3679(b) of the Revised Statutes (31 U.S.C. 665(b))" on authority of Pub. L. 97–258, §4(b), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1067, the first section of which enacted Title 31, Money and Finance.

#### Amendments

1975—Pub. L. 94–52 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).
Attachment H:

Partner Annual Assessment Form

– Buy

- Manufactured Recycled Products
### §455b. State tax as lien upon lands; prior lien of United States; rights of holder of tax title

All such taxes legally assessed shall be a lien upon the lands and may be enforced upon said lands by the sale thereof in the same manner and under the same proceeding whereby said taxes are enforced against lands held under private ownership; but the title or interest which the State or political subdivision thereof may convey by tax sale, tax deed, or as a result of any tax proceeding shall be subject to a prior lien reserved to the United States for all due and unpaid installments on the appraised purchase price of such lands and for all the unpaid charges authorized by law whether accrued or otherwise. The holder of such tax deed or tax title resulting from such tax shall be entitled to all the rights and privileges in the land of an assignee of such entryman on ceded Indian lands or of an assignee under the provisions of section 441 of this title or of any such entries in a Federal reclamation project constructed under said Act of June 17, 1902, as supplemented or amended.

(Apr. 21, 1928, ch. 394, §3, 45 Stat. 439; June 13, 1930, ch. 477, 46 Stat. 581.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of June 17, 1902, referred to in text, is act June 17, 1902, ch. 1093, 32 Stat. 388, popularly known as the Reclamation Act, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 371 of this title and Tables.
###### Editorial Note on Part 3282

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3282 appear at 78 FR 60199, Oct. 1, 2013.

#### § 3282.363 Right of entry and inspection.

Each primary inspection agency shall secure from each manufacturer and manufacturing plant under its surveillance an agreement that the Secretary, the State Administrative Agency and the primary inspection agency have the right to inspect the plant and its manufactured home inspection, labeling, and delivery records, and any of its manufactured homes in the hands of retailers or distributors at any reasonable time.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 30, 2018

a1022

Order 

Clerk

October 30, 2018

156866(22)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 156866

COA: 338179

Washtenaw CC: 73-006622-FC

CHESTER A. SHEPARD,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s July 27, 2018 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
### SUBCHAPTER I—RAILROAD RETIREMENT ACT OF 1934
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001021810
<NAME>                        INTELIDATA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S.
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                              6,395
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                       2,780
<ALLOWANCES>                          697 
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    8,575
<PP&E>                              3,466
<DEPRECIATION>                     (3,194)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      9,104
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              10,150
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                               32
<OTHER-SE>                         (1,078)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        9,104
<SALES>                               162
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    2,124
<CGS>                                  16
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         437
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    3,251
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      105
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (1,521)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (1,521)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                       (1,521)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.05)
        

</TABLE>
EX-10.1


   

  AMENDMENT 1 TO Consulting Agreement

   

  This Amendment 1 (“Amendment 1”) is dated August 4, 2022 and is effective as of July 3, 2022 (“Amendment 1 Effective Date”), by and between Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (“Company”) and Cristina Larkin, hereby amends Consulting Agreement between the Parties dated May 3, 2022 (the “Agreement”).  Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment 1 will have the same meanings as ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.  

   

  RECITALS

   

  WHEREAS, the Parties wish to modify the terms of the Agreement.

   

  NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises, the mutual promises and mutual covenants contained in this Amendment 1 and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

   

  1.Section 3(A) of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


   

  In consideration for Consultant's performance of the Services, Spero shall pay Consultant four hundred seventy-five dollars ($475) per hour.

   

  2.Other than as specifically provided in Section 1 above, the terms and conditions of the Agreement are not being modified by this Amendment 1 and will remain in full force and effect.  


   

  3.This Amendment 1 contains the Parties’ entire agreement with respect to the subject matter of this Amendment 1.


  4.This Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, without regard to the conflicts of law principles that would require application of different law. 


   

  5.This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, but all of which when taken together shall constitute a single instrument. Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page to this Amendment by telecopier or other electronic means (e.g., via PDF) shall be effective delivery of a manually executed counterpart of this Amendment.


   

  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment 1 as of the Amendment 1 Effective Date.

   

  		
	Spero Therapeutics, Inc.
	Cristina Larkin

	By: /s/ Ankit Mahadevia
	By: /s/ Cristina Larkin

	Name: Ankit Mahadevia
	Name: Cristina Larkin

	Title: CEO
	Title: