alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§650d, 650e. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–429, §8(6), Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4390

Section 650d, Pub. L. 91–518, title VIII, §814, as added Pub. L. 102–533, §11, Oct. 27, 1992, 106 Stat. 3520, related to formation of task force to consider recommendations on emergency training and response and to report to Congress not later than June 1, 1993.

Section 650e, Pub. L. 91–518, title VIII, §815, as added Pub. L. 102–533, §13, Oct. 27, 1992, 106 Stat. 3522, directed National Railroad Passenger Corporation to develop comprehensive plan for New York City station facilities.
§ 891.809 Limitations on capital advance funds. *Capital advances are not available in connection with:* ( a ) Acquisition of facilities currently owned and operated by the sponsor as housing for the elderly, except with rehabilitation as defined in 24 CFR 891.105;
( b ) The financing or refinancing of federally assisted or insured projects;
( c ) Facilities currently owned and operated by the sponsor as housing for persons with disabilities, except with rehabilitation as defined in 24 CFR 891.105; or
( d ) Units in Section 202 direct loan projects previously refinanced under the provisions of section 811 of the American Homeownership and Economic Opportunity Act of 2000, 12 U.S.C. 1701q note.
#### § 310.1 Bylaws of the Association.

The bylaws of the Association shall be duly adopted by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development pursuant to section 308 of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1723) and shall govern the performance of the powers and duties granted to or imposed upon the Association by law.
### §57533. Vessel chartering authority

The Secretary of Transportation may enter into contracts or other agreements on behalf of the United States to purchase, charter, operate, or otherwise acquire the use of any vessels documented under chapter 121 of this title and any other related real or personal property. The Secretary is authorized to use this authority as the Secretary deems appropriate.

(Added Pub. L. 110–181, div. C, title XXXV, §3511(a), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 593.)
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Interest of L.W., a Child

No. 06-23-00059-CV

Appeal from the 354th District Court of 

Hunt County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 91297). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief 

Justice Stevens, Justice van Cleef and 

Justice Rambin participating. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant has adequately indicated her inability to pay costs of appeal. 

Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED OCTOBER 27, 2023

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### § 92.1 Overview.

This part implements the HOME Investment Partnerships Act (the HOME Investment Partnerships Program). In general, under the HOME Investment Partnerships Program, HUD allocates funds by formula among eligible State and local governments to strengthen public-private partnerships and to expand the supply of decent, safe, sanitary, and affordable housing, with primary attention to rental housing, for very low-income and low-income families. Generally, HOME funds must be matched by nonfederal resources. State and local governments that become participating jurisdictions may use HOME funds to carry out multi-year housing strategies through acquisition, rehabilitation, and new construction of housing, and tenant-based rental assistance. Participating jurisdictions may provide assistance in a number of eligible forms, including loans, advances, equity investments, interest subsidies and other forms of investment that HUD approves.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 154 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 323 

[Report No. 109–284] 

To redesignate the Ellis Island Library on the third floor of the Ellis Island 

Immigration Museum, located on Ellis Island in New York Harbor, 

as the ‘‘Bob Hope Memorial Library’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2005 

Mr. ENGEL (for himself, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. WOLF, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Mr. 

MCNULTY, Mr. WAXMAN, Ms. WATSON, Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas, Mr. 

SERRANO, Mr. MEEKS of New York, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. 

LEWIS of California, and Mr. WEINER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

NOVEMBER 10, 2005 

Additional sponsors: Mr. HIGGINS, Mr. KUHL of New York, and Mr. 

SHERMAN

NOVEMBER 10, 2005 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

A BILL 

To redesignate the Ellis Island Library on the third floor 

of the Ellis Island Immigration Museum, located on Ellis 

Island in New York Harbor, as the ‘‘Bob Hope Memorial 

Library’’. 
2 

•HR 323 RH 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION. 

4 The Ellis Island Library on the third floor of the Ellis 

5 Island Immigration Museum, located on Ellis Island in 

6 New York Harbor, shall be known and redesignated as 

7 the ‘‘Bob Hope Memorial Library’’. 

8 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

9 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

10 paper, or other record of the United States to the Ellis 

11 Island Library on the third floor of the Ellis Island Immi12 gration Museum referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

13 to be a reference to the ‘‘Bob Hope Memorial Library’’. 

Union Calendar No. 154 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 323 

[Report No. 109–284] 

A BILL 

To redesignate the Ellis Island Library on the third 

‘‘Bob Hope Memorial Library’’. cated on Ellis Island in New York Harbor, as the floor of the Ellis Island Immigration Museum, loNOVEMBER 10, 2005 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
#### RAGEN et al., Respondents, v. DUNDON, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 13, 1903.)

Action by John Ragen and others against Edward A. Dundon.

No opinion. Judgment and-order affirmed, with costs.
Page 1 of 2

07/13/2012

Report/Publication References1in the Withdrawal for the

NPDES CAFO Reporting Rule

July 13, 2012

U.S. EPA. 2001. Environmental Assessment of Proposed Revisions to the National Pollutant

Discharge Elimination System Regulation and the Effluent Guidelines for Concentrated Animal 

Feeding Operations. Available at 

http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/docs.cfm?view=archivedprog&program_id=7&sort=name#cafopropo

sedrule_envassess_2001. 

U.S. EPA. 2009. An Urgent Call to Action – Report of the State-EPA Nutrient Innovations 

Task Group. Available at 

http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/standards/criteria/nutrients/upload/2009_08_27_criteria

_nutrient_nitgreport.pdf. 

U.S. EPA. 2009. Compliance and Enforcement National Priority: Concentrated Animal Feeding 

Operations (CAFOs), December 11, 2009. Available at 

http://www.epa.gov/oecaerth/resources/publications/data/planning/priorities/fy2008prioritycwac

afo.pdf

U.S. EPA. 2010. Geospatial Conference Presentation: GIS and Concentrated Animal Feeding 

Operations, July 2010. See Docket EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0188. Available at 

www.regulations.gov.

U.S. EPA. 2011. CWA Action Plan Implementation Priorities: Changes to Improve Water 

Quality, Increase Compliance and Expand Transparency, May 2011. Available at 

http://www.epa.gov/oecaerth/resources/publications/civil/programs/cwa/actionplanimplpriorities.pdf. 

U.S. EPA. 2011. Transport and Fate of Nutrients and Indicator Microorganisms at a Dairy 

Lagoon Water Application Site: An Assessment of Nutrient Management Plans, March 2011. 

EPA 600/R-10/116. Available at http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=P100DOTV.txt.

U.S. EPA. 2012. FY 2013 Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (OECA) Draft 

National Program Manager (NPM) Guidance, February 10, 2012. Available at 

http://www.wsema.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/FY13_OECA_DraftNPMGdnce.pdf.

U.S. EPA. 2012. Draft NPDES CAFO Reporting Rule Information Search, March 1, 2012. See 

Docket EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0188. Available at www.regulations.gov

U.S. EPA. Accessed 2012. NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule, RIN 2020-AA47, Pre-proposal. 

See http://yosemite.epa.gov/opei/rulegate.nsf/byRIN/2020-AA47.

 

1 This list of references does not include webpages or statutes. 
Page 2 of 2

07/13/2012

U.S. Government Accountability Office. 2008. Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations—EPA 

Needs More Information and a Clearly Defined Strategy to Protect Air and Water Quality, 

GAO–08–944 5 (2008), Appendix V: Comments from the US EPA, September 24, 2008. 

Available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08944.pdf.

U.S. GS. 2010. The Quality of our Nation’s waters—Nutrients in the Nation’s streams and 

Groundwater, 1992–2004: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1350. Available at 

http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/nutrients/pubs/circ1350/.

The President of the United States of America, Memorandum for the Heads of Executive 

Departments and Agencies - Transparency and Open Government, January 21, 2009. Available 

at http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/TransparencyandOpenGovernment.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF RE

CALENDAR PRIORITY FOR 6/4/10 FURTHER

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

1 C 09-02470 JSW (EMC)

EDMUND J. FERDINAND III (Pro Hac Vice)

GRIMES & BATTERSBY, LLP

488 Main Avenue

Norwalk, CT 06851

Telephone: (203) 849-8300

Facsimile: (203) 849-9300

ROBERT E. WHITE (Cal. Bar. No. 78567)

LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT E. WHITE

177 Post Street, Suite 890

San Francisco, CA 94108

Telephone: (415) 788-6151

Facsimile: (415) 788-6154

e-mail: rew@rwhitesf.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,

CAVIT CANTINA VITICOLTORI CONSORZIO

CANTINE SOCIALI DEL TRENTINO SOCIETA

COOPERATIVA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CAVIT CANTINA VITICOLTORI

CONSORZIO CANTINE SOCIALI DEL

TRENTINO SOCIETA COOPERATIVA,

Plaintiff and

Counterdefendant,

vs.

BROWMAN FAMILY VINEYARDS,

INC.

Defendant and

Counterclaimant.

CASE NO. C 09-02470 JSW (EMC)

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE

RELIEF RE CALENDAR PRIORITY

FOR 6/4/10 FURTHER CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Upon reading the motion of Plaintiff and counterdefendant CAVIT CANTINA

VITICOLTORI CONSORZIOCANTINE SOCIALI DEL TRENTINO SOCIETA

COOPERATIVA [hereinafter “Cavit”], for administrative relief pursuant to Civ. L.R. 7-11, for

calendar priority with respect to the Further Case Management Conference presently scheduled

for June 4, 2010, at 1:30 p.m., the supporting declaration of Edmund J. Ferdinand, III, and good

cause appearing therefor,

Case3:09-cv-02470-JSW Document64-2 Filed05/26/10 Page1 of 2 Case 3:09-cv-02470-JSW Document 68 Filed 05/27/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF RE

CALENDAR PRIORITY FOR 6/4/10 FURTHER

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

2 C 09-02470 JSW (EMC)

IT IS THEREFORE HEREBY ORDERED that this civil action (consolidated for

all purposes with Civil Action No. C 3:09-01070 JSW (EMC)) currently set for Further Case

Management Conference on June 4, 2010, on this Court’s 1:30 p.m. calendar shall be heard first

on the 1:30 p.m. calendar.

Dated: May ___, 2010.

 

HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

e:\grimes\adminrelief-proposed-order-01.doc

Case3:09-cv-02470-JSW Document64-2 Filed05/26/10 Page2 of 2

27

Case 3:09-cv-02470-JSW Document 68 Filed 05/27/10 Page 2 of 2
<Page>

Exhibit 99.2

          TURBODYNE ANNOUNCES VOLUNTARY DE-LISTING OF

           STOCK FROM NASDAQ EUROPE (FORMERLY EASDAQ)

Carpinteria, California - April 17, 2001 - Turbodyne Technologies,
Inc. (NASDAQ EUROPE: TRBD) announced today that on April 9, 2001 it
requested voluntary de-listing of its shares from trading on NASDAQ
Europe (formerly EASDAQ). On April 10, 2001, at a meeting of the
Market Authority of NASDAQ Europe, the voluntary de-listing was
accepted. Disciplinary proceedings against the Company are to be
withdrawn. Turbodyne will pay secretarial support costs of EURO 4,000.

Turbodyne continues to trade in the United States on the O.T.C. "Pink
Sheets" market, under the symbol TRBD. To keep investors informed, the
Company will issue press releases through the Business Wire, Dow,
Jones and on our web site, www.turbodyne.com. Securities and Exchange
Commission filings will be made quarterly (Form 10-Q) and annually
(Form 10-K). The Company will distribute to shareholders Annual
Reports and Proxy material so that the shareholders will be informed
of company activities and can vote on corporate issues.

"Because of our current capitalization situation," said Mr. Kenneth
Fitzpatrick, Company's President and CEO, "which did not meet NASDAQ
Europe continuing listing requirements, it seemed prudent to seek
voluntary de-listing of our shares. When our situation improves, the
Company's Board of Directors will consider filing for a re-listing."

Turbodyne Technologies, Inc., a California based high technology
company, specializes in the development of charging technology for
internal combustion engines and the development and manufacturing of
high-tech assemblies for electrically assisted turbochargers and
superchargers. Turbodyne Technologies' headquarters is located in
Carpinteria, California, and its European office is located in
Frankfurt, Germany.

Contacts:

Kenneth Fitzpatrick - President and CEO at California Headquarters:
(800) 566-1130



This release contains forward-looking statements as defined in Section
21 E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including statements
about future business operations, financial performance and market
conditions.  Such forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties inherent in business forecasts.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
#### GAUSE v. COMMONWEALTH TRUST CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 17, 1905.)

Action by Harry T. Gause against the Commonwealth Trust Company. No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1777

EDWARD JUNIOR CLARK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus QUEEN CITY RECOVERY; CARLYLE BRITT, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-372-3-MU) Submitted: October 18, 2001 Decided: October 25, 2001 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Edward Junior Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Michael David Bland, WEAVER, BENNETT & BLAND, P.A., Matthews, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Edward Junior Clark appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Clark v. Queen City Recovery , No. CA-00- 372-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Ma y 9 & 10, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Joseph Salvaggio, Sr., et al., Respondents, v. California Packing Co. et al., Appellants.

Appeal from an order of the Troy City Court denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the action for failure to prosecute. The action herein was commenced in the Troy City Court on or about September 24, 1954, an answer served and issue joined October 14, 1954. The case was adjourned on several occasions but since December, 1959, no action has been taken with reference to its disposition. The plaintiffs’ attorney, in his answering affi*558davit, stated that as the result of a fire which damaged his law office the file was misplaced and was only discovered after a search upon receipt of the motion papers and further stated that the plaintiffs had a good and substantial cause of action. We are always reluctant to interfere with the discretionary order of another court unless we are satisfied that there was an abuse of such discretionary power. The trial court apparently was satisfied with the excuse offered by the plaintiffs — unusual facts — and was therefore justified in denying the motion but did so only on condition that the plaintiffs within 15 days apply for a day certain for trial. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs.
### **CHAPTER 71—LICENSES AND CERTIFICATES OF REGISTRY**

Sec.
7101.
Issuing and classifying licenses and certificates of registry.
7102.
Citizenship.
7103.
Licenses for radio officers.
7104.
Certificates for medical doctors and nurses.
7105.
Oaths.
7106.
Duration of licenses.
7107.
Duration of certificates of registry.
7108.
Termination of licenses and certificates of registry.
7109.
Review of criminal records.
7110.
Exhibiting licenses.
7111.
Oral examinations for licenses.
7112.
Licenses of masters or mates as pilots.
7113.
Exemption from draft.
7114.
Fees.
[7115.
Repealed.]
7116.
Examinations for merchant mariner credentials.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–282, title VI, §601(c)(2), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4289, struck out item 7115 "Merchant Mariner Medical Advisory Committee".

**2016**—Pub. L. 114–120, title III, §315(b)(2), Feb. 8, 2016, 130 Stat. 62, added item 7116.

**2010**—Pub. L. 111–281, title II, §210(c), Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 2914, added item 7115.

**1990**—Pub. L. 101–380, title IV, §4102(e)(2), Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 510, substituted "Review of criminal records" for "Renewal of licenses" in item 7109.

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–364, title IV, §402(8)(A), July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 447, substituted "Oral examinations for licenses" for "Licenses for fishing vessels not subject to inspection" in item 7111.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 31, 2023

NO. 03-23-00352-CV

Jimmie Sharlene Cruz, Appellant

v.

River Ranch, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND SMITH

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on November 10, 2022. Having 

reviewed the record, the Court holds that Jimmie Sharlene Cruz has not prosecuted his appeal

and did not comply with a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses 

the appeal for want of prosecution. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no 

adjudication of costs is made.
| | 
| | 







906 CERTIFICATION OF 20-F REPORT

OF

KIMBER RESOURCES INC

FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2006



The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Kimber Resources Inc. ("  Kimber "). This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the 20-F Report of Kimber for the year ended June 30, 2006.

We certify that such 20-F Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 20-F Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Kimber.

This Certification is executed as of  September 25, 2006.











| | R. V. Longe                         | 
| | ------------------------------------- | 
| | Robert V. Longe                       | 
| | President and Chief Executive Officer | 
| | (Principal Executive Officer)         | 



| | Gordon Cummings                            | 
| | -------------------------------------------- | 
| | Gordon Cummings                              | 
| | Chief Financial Officer                      | 
| | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
Exhibit 99.1

 

**November 27, 2006**

John Lowber, (907) 868-5628; jlowber@gci.com

Bruce Broquet, (907) 868-6660; broquet@gci.com

 

**FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE**

**GCI RECEIVES DELISTING NOTICE FROM NASDAQ**

**ANCHORAGE, AK** -- General Communication, Inc. ("GCI") (Nasdaq: GNCMA) announced that it received a Staff Determination Letter from Nasdaq on November 20, 2006 indicating that GCI’s common stock is subject to delisting from The Nasdaq Stock Market.  The letter stated that GCI is not in compliance with Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4310(c)(14), which requires the company to file all required reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission within the required time periods, because GCI filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 before its auditors had completed their review of the financial statements contained in the report.  

 

GCI will appeal the determination and request a hearing before a Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Panel, which will automatically stay delisting of the company’s common stock pending the Panel’s review and determination.  

 

As soon as GCI’s independent registered public accounting firm completes its review of GCI’s unaudited consolidated financial statements for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2006, GCI will file an amendment to the Form 10-Q to reflect material changes, if any, resulting from the independent auditor's review.  

 

GCI is the largest telecommunications company in Alaska. A pioneer in bundled services, GCI provides local, wireless, and long distance telephone, cable television, Internet and data communication services throughout Alaska. More information about the company can be found at www.gci.com. 

 

**#**    **#**    **#**
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-41166 Summary Calendar

HECTOR CAVAZOS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus KENNETH S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-94-CV-219

- - - - - - - - - - November 13, 1997 Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Hector Cavazos appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s determination that Cavazos is not entitled to Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income benefits. Cavazos argues that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) erred in failing to give controlling weight to the opinion of the treating physician over the opinion of the non-examining medical advisor. We conclude that the ALJ did not err, as a matter of law, in crediting theNo. 96-41166 -2- opinion of the non-examining medical advisor, which was supported by the evidence, over the opinion of Cavazos’s treating physician. See Oldham v. Schweiker , 660 F.2d 1078, 1084 (5th Cir. 1981). Cavazos also argues that the ALJ failed to consider adequately his subjective complaints of pain. The record reflects that the ALJ found the medical evidence more persuasive than Cavazos’s own testimony in deciding that he was capable of performing light work, which is precisely the kind of determination that the ALJ is best suited to make. See Falco v. Shalala , 27 F.3d at 160, 163-64 (5th Cir. 1994). Finally, notwithstanding Cavazos’s contrary assertion, substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s determination that he has the residual functional capacity to perform the full range of light work. See Villa v. Sullivan , 895 F.2d 1019, 1021 (5th Cir. 1990).
AFFIRMED.