alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 291.200 Future REO acquisition method. ( a ) Under this method of property disposition, HUD will enter into a property acquisition agreement (or agreements) with a transferor (or transferors), which shall provide for the right and obligation of the transferor(s) to acquire a future quantity of properties designated by HUD as they become available. The transferor(s) will be selected through a competitive process, conducted in accordance with applicable laws. HUD will negotiate the specific terms of the property acquisition agreement(s) with the selected transferor(s). The properties will be available on an “as-is” basis only, without repairs or warranties.
( b ) *Eligible entities.* An individual, partnership, corporation, or other legal entity will not be eligible to participate in this process if at the time of the sale, that individual or entity is debarred, suspended, or otherwise precluded from doing business with HUD under 2 CFR part 2424.
[64 FR 6481, Feb. 9, 1999, as amended at 72 FR 73495, Dec. 27, 2007]
#### W. D. Cook, appellant, v. Theodore Clark, appellee.

Complaint against actual and permissive waste by owner of fee against a defendant holding as homestead and dower. Decree in favor of appellee dismissing bill for want of equity. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Pike county; the Hon. Fred G. Wolfe, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 17, 1923.

L. T. Graham and William and Barry Mumford, for appellant. Williams & Williams, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Shurtleff

delivered the opinion of the court.
Editorial Note on Part 888
Editorial Note: For revisions and amendments affecting Schedules A, B, C, and D, issued under part 888, but not carried in the Code of Federal Regulations, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 888.415 Restrictions on retroactive payments. ( a ) *Restrictions.* Retroactive payments are subject to all regulations, procedures, or restrictions that apply to Housing Assistance Payments.
( b ) *Review of initial rents.* Before calculating the amount of any retroactive payment, the PHA, if directed by HUD, will review whether rents were excessive when initially set.
( c ) *Physical condition of projects.* If the most recent physical inspection report by the PHA shows significant deficiencies that have not been addressed to the satisfaction of the PHA by the date the retroactive payment is deposited into the project account, the payment will not be made available until the deficiencies are resolved or a plan for their resolution has been approved by the PHA.
RACHEL DEJESUS,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-5394

Opinion filed June 6, 2017.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.

Charlie Cofer, Public Defender, Elizabeth H. Webb, Assistant Public Defender, 

Jacksonville, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Jason W. Rodriguez, Tallahassee, for 

Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is DENIED on the merits.

ROBERTS, C.J., LEWIS, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
----

|        |   | Top Ships Inc                     |
|-------------|--------|-----------------------------------|
|        |   |                              |
|        |   |                              |
|        |   |                              |
|        |   | By: /s/ Alexandros Isipilos       |
|        |   |                              |
|        |   | Name: Alexandros Isipilos         |
|        |   |                              |
|        |   | Title: CFO-Director               |
|        |   |                              |
| Witness:    |   |                              |
|        |   |                              |
| Signature:  |   |                              |
|        |   |                              |
| Full Name:  |   |                              |
|        |   |                              |
| Address:    |   |                              |
|        |   |                              |
| Occupation: |   |                              |
|        |   |                              |
|        |   | Laurasia Trading Ltd.             |
|        |   |                              |
|        |   | By: /s/ Dimosthenis Elegtheriadis |
|        |   |                              |
|        |   | Name: Dimosthenis Elegtheriadis   |
|        |   |                              |
|        |   | Title: President/Director         |
|        |   |                              |
| Witness:    |   |                              |
|        |   |                              |
| Signature:  |   |                              |
|        |   |                              |
| Full Name:  |   |                              |
|        |   |                              |
| Address:    |   |                              |
|        |   |                              |
| Occupation: |   |                              |
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Esther A. Sipmeier, Also Known as Esther Sipmeier, Deceased. Chester M. Pomar, Appellant; Marie Bernatz et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding to compel the executrix of an estate to convey certain real property owned by the deceased to petitioner upon his payment of a stated amount of money therefor, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Putnam County, dated March 31, 1977, which granted respondents’ motion for summary judgment, and denied his cross motion for summary judgment. Order modified, on the law, by deleting therefrom the provision granting respondents’ motion for summary judgment and substituting therefor a provision that the said motion is denied. As so modified, order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements payable by respondent Duke to appellant, and proceeding remanded to the Surrogate’s Court for further proceedings consistent herewith. The agreement granting the petitioner an option to purchase the leased premises, as subsequently amended by a lease, is not, on its face, invalid as an unreasonable restraint on alienation (see 33 NY Jur, Landlord and Tenant, § 196 *et seq.).*However, many questions of fact remain for resolution before it can be said that petitioner-appellant is entitled to enforce the provision. It is unclear whether a condition for the exercise of the option required the deaths of the owners in a common disaster or at about the same time. The question of who must actually exercise the option must also be resolved. Although the option is clearly for the benefit of petitioner, it is conditioned on the operation of a hardware business which has been operated in corporate form. These and other questions of fact must be determined by the Surrogate. Martuscello, J. P., Rabin, Cohalan and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
### Selected Physical, Chemical, and Biological Data for 30 Urbanizing Streams in the North Carolina Piedmont Ecoregion, 2002-2003

By: E.M. GiddingsMichelle MoormanThomas F. Cuffney**Gerard McMahon**Douglas A. Harned

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds279

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area
Editorial Note on Part 62
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 62 appear at 64 FR 54539, Oct. 7, 1999, and 67 FR 17612, 17613, Apr. 11, 2002.

§ 62.1 Purpose. ( a ) The regulations set forth in this part implement the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961 (the “Act”), as amended, Public Law 87-256, 22 U.S.C. 2451, *et seq.* (1988). The purpose of the Act is to increase mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the people of other countries by means of educational and cultural exchanges. Educational and cultural exchanges assist the Department of State in furthering the foreign policy objectives of the United States. These exchanges are defined by section 102 of the Act, 22 U.S.C. 2452, and section 101(a)(15)(J) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(J).
( b ) The Secretary of State of the Department of State facilitates activities specified in the Act, in part, by designating public and private entities to act as sponsors of the Exchange Visitor Program. Sponsors may act independently or with the assistance of third parties. The purpose of the Program is to provide foreign nationals with opportunities to participate in educational and cultural programs in the United States and return home to share their experiences, and to encourage Americans to participate in educational and cultural programs in other countries. Exchange visitors enter the United States on a J visa. The regulations set forth in this subpart are applicable to all sponsors.
( c ) The Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs of the Department of State may, in his or her sole discretion and to the extent consistent with the authorities described in paragraph (a) of this section and other applicable law, waive or modify any provision of this part with respect to programs that are established pursuant to memoranda of understanding, letters of intent or similar arrangements between the United States and foreign governments. When establishing such a program, the Department will publish a notice in the Federal Register describing the program and any resulting modifications to or waivers of provisions of this part. If such an arrangement will not result in a waiver of or other modification to the provisions of this part, then the Department need not publish a notice.
[79 FR 60307, Oct. 6, 2014]
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  a)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Famous Daves of America, Inc. for the
quarter ended April 2, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andb)
    
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Famous Daves of America, Inc.
 Dated: May 12, 2006
    
    By:
    

/s/
David GoronkinDavid GoronkinPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
 Dated: May 12, 2006
    

/s/
Diana Garvis PurcelDiana Garvis PurcelChief Financial Officer and Secretary(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
4

-97°00/ 00":

. 968 S4’ GO”.

~~ 96%48’ 00”

x

96942’ 00" _ ~96"36’ 00% _-96" 30’ 00” _ 9692400". ~ “96 18’ 00" -96° 12’ 00"

\

>967 00’ 00”

27836’ 00”

27° 30’ 00”

- 7 )

-967 06’ 00”.
a : — 27% 36’ 00”

ye

27° 24’ 00”

27° 30’ 00”

27° 18’ 00”

=, 278 24’ 00”

wn

PT “1 2 hn 0 0 "

27°06’ 00" -—

a

27°06’ 00" |

y

-967 48’ 00" - : -96° 42" 00" ~ -96%36'00" ~ ~96? 30’ 00” -96? 24’ 00" -96° 18’ 00" -96° 12’ 00" ”-96"06"00" | Te “e6*00" 00°
aren MUSTANG N270096W
- - ~. SCALE: 1:100,000
: = NOS MULTIBEAM SURVEYS
Contours. in corrected meters

27°18’ 00"

VINUOYMVO ‘SNIAHL

r
|

Haan

« NOWWYOdHOS CI0H NVId

xs, Bowyeny)
bul-wWw7
HARBIN SNIAAVEC

Pe
s
2
ii
fs]
&
ec
pil
3
a
Zz
5

ee ‘907/:/

0H NWd

VINYOSNVA *

HaIANN ONIMVEO

—t

HABINNN SNIMVea

NOLWHOdHOD OCH NVId

VINGOSMVO "SNIASI

HaEIAINN SONIA
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATION AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001021907
<NAME> M.S. ACQUISITION CORP.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1997
<CASH>                                              35
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,093
<ALLOWANCES>                                       523
<INVENTORY>                                     14,508
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,049
<PP&E>                                          85,507
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,582
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,470
<BONDS>                                         91,802
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           12,138
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                    (22,490)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   144,325
<SALES>                                         55,097
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,097
<CGS>                                           46,975
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,975
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,833
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,489
<INCOME-TAX>                                       576
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                913
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       913
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Aurelio Resource Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended
May 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Dr. Frederik Warnaars, President, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.

Date: August 28, 2006

/s/ Frederik Warnaars

Signature: Dr. Frederik WarnaarsTitle: President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer)



---
#### Michael R. Schlanger v. Tamara Cowan et al.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellants procure the record on appeal and appellants’ points to be served and filed on or before January 3, 1961, with notice of argument for the February 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. The motion to dismiss the appeal from the order entered October 10, 1960 is denied. Motion for leave to dispense with printing denied. Concur-—Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens, Eager and Noonan, JJ.
### SUBCHAPTER VIII—INDIAN LANDS
§ 3.520 Job classification and structure. A recipient shall not: ( a ) Classify a job as being for males or for females;
( b ) Maintain or establish separate lines of progression, seniority lists, career ladders, or tenure systems based on sex; or
( c ) Maintain or establish separate lines of progression, seniority systems, career ladders, or tenure systems for similar jobs, position descriptions, or job requirements that classify persons on the basis of sex, unless sex is a bona fide occupational qualification for the positions in question as set forth in § 3.550.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1
------------

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Computerized Thermal Imaging, Inc.,
(the "Company") on form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Richard V. Secord, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

Date:  November 14, 2002                        /s/ Richard V. Secord
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Richard V. Secord
                                                Chairman of the Board and Chief
                                                Executive Officer

================================================================================

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Computerized Thermal Imaging, Inc.,
(the "Company") on form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Bernard J. Brady, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

Date:  November 14, 2002                                 /s/ Bernard J. Brady
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Bernard J. Brady
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
§ 207.252a Premiums—operating loss loans. ( a ) The mortgagee, upon the insurance endorsement of the increase loan credit instrument covering the operating loss loan, shall pay to the Commissioner a first mortgage insurance premium of not less than one-fourth of one percent nor more than one percent as the Secretary shall determine of the original amount of the loan.
( b ) The provisions of paragraphs (d), (e), (f) and (g) of Sec. 207.252 shall apply to operating loss loans.
[66 FR 35073, July 2, 2001]
§ 570.466 Additional application submission requirements for Pockets of Poverty—employment opportunities. Applicants for Action Grants under the Pockets of Poverty provision must describe the number and, to the extent possible, the types of new jobs (construction and permanent) that will be provided to the low- and moderate-income residents of the Pocket of Poverty as a direct result of the proposed project. If the application calls for job training programs (such as those related to the CETA program) or job recruiting services for the pocket's residents, then such proposed activities must be clearly and fully explained. HUD requires applicants to ensure that at least 75 percent of whatever permanent jobs initially result from the project are provided to low- and moderate-income persons and that at least 51 percent of whatever permanent jobs initially result from the project are provided to low- and moderate-income residents from the pocket. HUD encourages applicants to ensure that at least 20 percent of all permanent jobs are filled by persons from the pocket qualified to participate in the CETA program on a continuous basis. HUD requires all applicants to continuously use best efforts to ensure that at least 75 percent of all permanent jobs resulting from any Action Grant-assisted project are provided to low- and moderate-income persons and that at least 51 percent of all permanent jobs resulting from any Action Grant-assisted project are provided to low- and moderate-income residents from the pocket. The application should clearly describe how the applicant intends to meet initial and continuous job requirements. Private participating parties must meet these employment requirements in the aggregate. To enable the private participants to do so, lease agreements executed by a private participating party shall include: ( a ) Provisions requiring lessees to follow hiring practices that the private participating party has determined will enable it to meet these requirements in the aggregate; and
( b ) Provisions that will enable the private participating party to declare a default under the lease agreement if the lessees do not follow such practices.
[61 FR 11476, Mar. 20, 1996]
#### § 58.21 Time periods.

All time periods in this part shall be counted in calendar days. The first day of a time period begins at 12:01 a.m. local time on the day following the publication or the mailing and posting date of the notice which initiates the time period.
Editorial Note on Part 792
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 792 appear at 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999.

§ 792.103 Definitions. *Fraud and abuse.* Fraud and abuse means a single act or pattern of actions: ( 1 ) That constitutes false statement, omission, or concealment of a substantive fact, made with intent to deceive or mislead; and
( 2 ) That results in payment of section 8 program funds in violation of section 8 program requirements. The terms *Public Housing Agency (PHA)* and *Indian Housing Authority (IHA)* are defined in 24 CFR part 5.
*Judgment.* Judgment means a provision for recovery of section 8 program funds obtained through fraud and abuse, by order of a court in litigation or by a settlement of a claim in litigation, whether or not stated in a court order.
*Litigation.* A lawsuit brought by a PHA to recover section 8 program funds obtained as a result of fraud and abuse.
*Principal party in initiating or sustaining an action to recover.* Principal party in initiating or sustaining an action to recover means the party that incurs more than half the costs incurred in: ( 1 ) Recertifying tenants who fraudulently obtained section 8 rental assistance;
( 2 ) Recomputing the correct amounts owed by tenants; and
( 3 ) Taking needed actions to recoup the excess benefits received, such as initiating litigation. Costs incurred to detect potential excessive benefits in the routine day-to-day operations of the program are excluded in determining the principal party in initiating or sustaining an action to recover. For example, the cost of income verification during an annual recertification would not be counted in determining the principal party in initiating or sustaining an action to recover.
*Public housing agency (PHA).* A public housing agency as defined in § 791.102.
*Repayment agreement.* Repayment agreement means a formal document signed by a tenant or owner and provided to a PHA in which a tenant or owner acknowledges a debt, in a specific amount, and agrees to repay the amount due at specific time period(s).
[59 FR 9409, Feb. 28, 1994, as amended at 61 FR 5212, Feb. 9, 1996; 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999]