alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,190,290
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,933,367
<ALLOWANCES>                                    98,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,419,508
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,640,213
<PP&E>                                         815,810
<DEPRECIATION>                                  90,538
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,997,931
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,350,232
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,347
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,604,175
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,997,931
<SALES>                                      4,452,249
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,452,249
<CGS>                                        3,427,525
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  878,953
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (12,914)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,918
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                151,767
<INCOME-TAX>                                    59,189
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    92,578
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 99.2 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCEPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2004-30 (the Trust) I, Nancy H. Forte, a duly elected and acting officer of Citibank, N.A. (Indenture Trustee),
do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture Trustee, that: 1. I have reviewed and examined the performance by the Indenture Trustee of the application of
trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section
6.06 of the Indenture pursuant to which the Trusts notes were issued during the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2004 (the Relevant Year); and 2. Based upon my review and examination described in 1 above, and except as provided in the
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Compliance, dated March 15, 2005,
prepared by the Ernst & Young LLP substantially in accordance with Section 4.05 of the Expense and
Indemnity Agreement, to the best of my knowledge, the application of trust money collected by the
Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the Indenture was
performed in accordance with the terms of the Indenture throughout the Relevant Year. CITIBANK, N.A., as Indenture Trustee By:
    
    /s/ Nancy H. ForteName: Nancy H. ForteTitle: Assistant Vice PresidentDate:
    
    March 29, 2005
#### § 599.505 Coordinating responsible authority (CoRA).

Within 30 days of the Renewal Community designation, the State and local governments in which the area is located must submit to HUD information identifying the coordinating responsible authority (CoRA), which is the entity, organization or persons with the responsibility and authority to achieve the State and local government commitments made at the time of application as required by § 599.107 and to undertake the development and administration of policies, procedures and activities to implement and maximize the Federal, State and local benefits made available in the Renewal Community.
EX-10.18





 Exhibit 10.18 

NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENT TO THE 

GE PERFORMANCE SHARE GRANT AGREEMENT 

This NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENT TO THE GE PERFORMANCE SHARE GRANT AGREEMENT (this “Notice”) is hereby given that, effective July 30,
2021 (the “effective date”), certain adjustments were made to the GE Performance Share Grant Agreement between General Electric Company (the “Company”) and H. Lawrence Culp, Jr., dated August 18, 2020 (the “Award
Agreement”), which documents the grant of certain performance shares by the Company to Mr. Culp. 
 This Notice is to advise
Mr. Culp that proportional adjustments have been made to the Award Agreement to reflect the reverse stock split of the Company’s common stock at a ratio of
1-for-8 (the “reverse stock split”), which was completed on the effective date. The adjustments described herein are made in accordance with the anti-dilution
provisions of the Award Agreement and the 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, and are consistent with the adjustments made for shareholders generally. 
  

	 	1.	 Adjustments: 


  


	 	a.	 The number of performance shares granted at target is adjusted from 9,295,352 to 1,161,919.



  

	 	b.	 The reference to par value shall mean $0.01 per share. 



 

	 	c.	 The Reference Stock Price is adjusted from $6.67 to $53.36. 



 

	 	d.	 The closing price per Share used to calculate the Highest Average Price shall be adjusted for any day prior to
and including the effective date of this Notice to reflect the reverse stock split. 


  

	 	2.	 Effect of Notice. Except as set forth in this Notice, the terms of the Award Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect. 


 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Notice has been duly given by and on behalf of the Company. 












 
			
	General Electric Company
		
	By:	 	/s/ L. Kevin Cox
	Name:	 	L. Kevin Cox
	Title:	 	Chief Human Resource Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. ("Company") Quarterly Report
on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2007 ("Report"), the undersigned
certifies that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:      August 14, 2007

BY: /S/ ALBERT F. CASE, JR.
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


<PAGE>




                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. ("Company") Quarterly Report
on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2007 ("Report"), the undersigned
certifies that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:      August 14, 2007

BY:    /S/ DEBI KOKINOS
---    ----------------
Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIANO CORTEZ,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 19

- 71884

Agency No. A087

- 683

- 178

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Immigration Judge

Submitted May 6, 2020 * *

Before: BERZON, N.R. SMITH, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Mariano Cortez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of

an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) dete rmination under 8 C.F.R. § 1208.31(a) that he

did not have a reasonable fear of persecution or torture in El Salvador and thus is

not entitled to relief from his reinstated removal order. We have jurisdiction under

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substant ial evidence the IJ’s factual findings.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# F ILED

MAY 12 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 71884

Andrade

- Garcia v. Lynch , 828 F.3d 829, 836 (9th Cir. 2016)

. We deny the petition

for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ ’ s determination that Cortez f ailed to

demonstrate a reasonable possibility of persecution on account of a protected

ground. See Zetino v. Holder , 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) ( “An

[ applicant’s ] desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or

random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground

. ”).

Substantial evidence also supports the IJ ’ s determination that Cortez f ailed

to demonstrate a reasonable possibility of torture by or with the consent or

acqui escence of the government if returned to El Salvador

. See Andrade

- Garcia

,

828 F.3d at 836

- 37.

Cortez ’s motion for a stay of removal (Docket Entry No. 2 ) is denied as

moot.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
§ 886.116 Security and utility deposits. ( a ) An Owner may require Families to pay a security deposit in an amount up to, but not more than, one month's Gross Family Contribution. If a Family vacates its unit, the Owner, subject to State and local laws, may utilize the deposit as reimbursement for any unpaid rent or other amount owed under the Lease. If the Family has provided a security deposit and it is insufficient for such reimbursement, the Owner may claim reimbursement from HUD, not to exceed an amount equal to the remainder of one month's Contract Rent. Any reimbursement under this section shall be applied first toward any unpaid rent. If a Family vacates the unit owing no rent or other amount under the Lease or if such amount is less than the amount of the security deposit, the Owner shall refund the full amount or the unused balance, as the case may be, to the Family.
( b ) In those jurisdictions where interest is payable by the Owner on security deposits, the refunded amount shall include the amount of interest payable. All security deposit funds shall be deposited by the Owner in a segregated bank account, and the balance of this account, at all times, shall be equal to the total amount collected from tenants then in occupancy, plus any accrued interest. The Owner shall comply with all State and local laws regarding interest payments on security deposits.
( c ) Families shall be expected to obtain the funds to pay security and utility deposits, if required, from their own resources and/or other private or public sources.
§ 503.4 Time limits. ( a ) *General.* The FOIA sets certain time limits for us to decide whether to disclose the records you requested, and to decide appeals. If we fail to meet the deadlines, you may proceed as if we had denied your request or your appeal. Since requests may be misaddressed or misrouted, you should call or write to confirm that we have the request and to learn its status if you have not heard from us in a reasonable time.
( b ) *Time allowed.* ( 1 ) We will decide whether to release records within 20 working days after your request reaches the appropriate area office that maintains the records you are requesting. When we decide to release records, we will actually provide the records at that time, or as soon as possible after that decision, or let you inspect them as soon as possible thereafter.
( 2 ) We will decide an appeal within 20 working days after the appeal reaches the appropriate reviewing official.
( 3 ) ( i ) The FOIA Officer or appeal official may extend the time limits in unusual circumstances for initial requests or appeals, up to 10 working days. We will notify you in writing of any extensions. “Unusual circumstances” include situations where we: Search for and collect records from field facilities, records centers or locations other than the office processing the records; search for, collect, or examine a great many records in response to a single request; consult with another office or department that has substantial interest in the determination of the request; and/or conduct negotiations with submitters and requesters of information to determine the nature and extent of non-disclosable proprietary materials.
( ii ) If an extra ten days still does not provide sufficient time for the Agency to deal with your request, we will inform you that the request cannot be processed within the statutory time limit and provide you with the opportunity to limit the scope of your request and/or arrange with us a negotiated deadline for processing your request.
( iii ) If you refuse to reasonably limit the scope of your request or refuse to agree upon a time frame, the Agency will process your case, as it would have, had no modification been sought. We will make a diligent, good faith effort to complete our review within the statutory time frame.
#### § 92.256 [Reserved]
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1


Certification of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as


Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002






| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the
    Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the
    Report) fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|
| | (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                



| |     |               
| | --- | --------------
| | By: | /s/ John Emery

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | John Emery             
| | Chief Executive Officer



78
§ 92.62 Review of program description and certifications. ( a ) *Review of program description.* The responsible HUD Field Office will review an insular area's program description and will approve the description unless the insular area has failed to submit information sufficient to allow HUD to make the necessary determinations required for § 92.61 (b)(4), (b)(6), and (b)(7), or the guidelines under (b)(8) are not satisfactory to HUD, if applicable; or if the level of proposed projects or eligible activities is not within the management capability demonstrated by past performance in housing and community development programs. If the insular area has not submitted information on § 92.61 (b)(4), (b)(6), and (b)(7), or the guidelines under (b)(8) are not satisfactory to HUD, if applicable; or if the level of proposed projects or eligible activities is not within the management capability demonstrated by past performance in housing and community development programs, the insular area may be required to furnish such further information or assurances as HUD may consider necessary to find the program description and certifications satisfactory. The HUD Field Office shall work with the insular area to achieve a complete and satisfactory program description.
( b ) *Review period.* Within thirty days of receipt of the program description, the HUD Field Office will notify the insular area if determinations cannot be made under § 92.61 (b)(4), (b)(6), (b)(7), or (b)(8) with the supporting information submitted, or if the proposed projects or activities are beyond currently demonstrated capability. The insular area will have a reasonable period of time, agreed upon mutually, to submit the necessary supporting information or to revise the proposed projects or activities in its program description.
( c ) *HOME Investment Partnership Agreement.* After HUD Field Office approval under this section, a HOME funds allocation is made by HUD execution of the agreement, subject to execution by the insular area. The funds are obligated on the date HUD notifies the insular area of HUD's execution of the agreement.
# STATEOFLOUISIANA COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT KINYA BOYD VERSUS NO. 2023 CW 1279 CITY OF BATON ROUGE, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE 

### MARCH 13, 2024 InRe:
BEFORE: Cox Communications of Louisiana, LLC and Go Insurance Company, applying for supervisory 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Rouge, No. 656948. GUIDRY, C.J., CHUTZAND LANIER, JJ. Auto writs,

Baton
WRIT DENIED. The criteria set forth in Herlitz Construction Co., Inc. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, Inc., 396 So.2d 878 (La. 1981) 

### (per curiam), are not met.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT JMG WRC WIL
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------


                         COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC.


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


             CWABS REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST, SERIES 2004-E
         REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN ASSET BACKED NOTES, SERIES 2004-E

         The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (the "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further
certify pursuant to Section 3.09 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement for the
above-captioned Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.

/s/ Joseph M. Candelario                       Dated: March 30, 2005
------------------------


JOSEPH M. CANDELARIO
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Mark Wong                                  Dated: March 30, 2005
-------------

MARK WONG
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
#### In re NUTTING.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 3, 1905.)

In the matter of the application of Robert B. Nutting for admission to the bar. No opinion. Application granted.
EXHIBIT 32.2













CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of ZAGG Inc (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Brandon T. O’Brien, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/BRANDON T. O’BRIENBrandon T. O’Brien

Chief Financial Officer

January 27, 2012




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 180.440 Prehearing conferences. ( a ) Before the commencement of or during the course of the hearing, the ALJ may direct the parties to participate in a conference to expedite the hearing. Failure to attend a conference may constitute a waiver of all objections to the agreements reached at the conference and to any order with respect thereto.
( b ) During the conference, the ALJ may dispose of any procedural matters on which he/she is authorized to rule. At the conference, the following matters may be considered: ( 1 ) Pre-trial motions;
( 2 ) Identification, simplification and clarification of the issues;
( 3 ) Necessary amendments to the pleadings;
( 4 ) Stipulations of fact and of the authenticity, accuracy, and admissibility of documents;
( 5 ) Limitations on the number of witnesses;
( 6 ) Negotiation, compromise, or settlement of issues;
( 7 ) The exchange of proposed exhibits and witness lists;
( 8 ) Matters of which official notice will be requested;
( 9 ) Scheduling actions discussed at the conference; and
( 10 ) Such other matters as may assist in the disposition of the proceeding.
( c ) Conferences may be conducted by telephone or in person, but generally shall be conducted by telephone, unless the ALJ determines that this method is inappropriate. The ALJ shall give reasonable notice of the time, place and manner of the conference.
( d ) *Record of conference.* Unless otherwise directed by the ALJ, the conference will not be stenographically recorded. The ALJ will reduce the actions taken at the conference to a written order or, if the conference takes place less than seven days before the beginning of the hearing, may make a statement at the hearing and on the record summarizing the actions taken at the conference.
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
|   |   |   |
| Date:  | July 26, 2012 | By:   | /s/ Martin S. Craighead |
|   |   |   | Martin S. Craighead |
|   |   |   | President andChief Executive Officer  |
|   |   |
SUPPLEMENT TO SYMETRA DEFERRED VARIABLE ANNUITY PROSPECTUS
                   SUPPLEMENT DATED JANUARY 23, 2006
             TO PROSPECTUS DATED MAY 1, 1998, AS SUPPLEMENTED

Effective February 6, 2006, Scudder Investments will change its name to DWS
Scudder and the Scudder funds will be renamed as follows:

<table>

<c><c?

Current Portfolio Name			New Portfolio  Name, Effective February 6, 2006
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scudder Capital Growth Portfolio	DWS Capital Growth VIP

Scudder International Portfolio	        DWS International VIP

Scudder Money Market Portfolio		Money Market VIP

</table>

Accordingly, any reference to  the above-referenced Current Portfolio Names
in this prospectus is replaced with the New Portfolio Name.