alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Headley-Reed Company, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, v. Bolling Company, Inc., Appellant-Respondent.

Order, entered on June 28, 1963, granting defendant’s motion to the extent of staying the action commenced on June 3, 1963, unanimously modified on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, so as to deny the stay, and as so modified, the order is affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to plaintiff-respondent-appellant. This action was commenced to recover for commissions claimed to be due to the plaintiff. It was settled by stipulation. Thereafter, and on June 3, a second action was commenced by the plaintiff, claiming that moneys had become due to him subsequent to the settlement of the first action. It is the defendant’s position that all claims by the plaintiff against the defendant were settled by the stipulation and that there is no basis, in the light of that stipulation, for the second action. In consequence, the defendant moved in this action for a stay of the second action, and further, for a direction that the plaintiff execute an unconditional stipulation discontinuing the second action. Special Term granted the stay but denied the requested direction. We conclude that the application for a stay should also have been denied. The better way to test the position of the defendant that all claims between it and the plaintiff had been settled by the stipulation entered into in this action, would be by asserting that position as a defense in the action sought to be stayed. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Bergan, JJ.
### §51705. Training for use of force against piracy

The Secretary of Transportation, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating, shall certify a training curriculum for United States mariners on the use of force against pirates. The curriculum shall include—

(1) information on waters designated as high-risk waters by the Commandant of the Coast Guard;

(2) information on current threats and patterns of attack by pirates;

(3) tactics for defense of a vessel, including instruction on the types, use, and limitations of security equipment;

(4) standard rules for the use of force for self-defense as developed by the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating under section 912(c) of the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–281; 46 U.S.C. 8107 note), including instruction on firearm safety for crewmembers of vessels carrying cargo under section 55305 of this title; and

(5) procedures to follow to improve crewmember survivability if captured and taken hostage by pirates.

(Added Pub. L. 112–213, title V, §502(a), Dec. 20, 2012, 126 Stat. 1574.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Deadline

Pub. L. 112–213, title V, §502(b), Dec. 20, 2012, 126 Stat. 1575, provided that: "The Secretary of Transportation shall certify the curriculum required under the amendment made by subsection (a) [enacting this section] not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 20, 2012]."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Gregory Anderson, M.S.,  M.P.H., Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop US8-1, Atlanta, Georgia 30329-4027, (404) 718-8833,                         *GAnderson@cdc.gov.*

                        The Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Kalwant Smagh,

Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2020-26558 Filed 12-1-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WORLDS.COM INC,

Plaintiff(s),

    v.

NCSOFT CORPORATION,

Defendant(s).                                                                      /

No. C 09-1982  MHP

ORDER(Ninety-Day Conditional Dismissal)

The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a

settlement of this action.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice; provided,

however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with a proof of service of a copy on

opposing counsel, within 90 days from the date hereof, that the agreed consideration for the

settlement has not been delivered over, this Order shall stand vacated, and the action shall be

restored to the calendar to be set for trial.

Dated: 4/23/2010MARILYN HALL PATELUnited States District Court Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01982-MHP   Document 79   Filed 04/23/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-09T03:46:28-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ZAGG Incorporated (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Brandon T. O’Brien, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/BRANDON T. O’BRIENBrandon T. O’Brien

Chief Financial Officer



March 24, 2011




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Jerome Garf, Respondent, v George E. Hall et al., Appellants.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February *8208, 1977, which, *inter alia,*granted plaintiffs motion to set aside a jury verdict in favor of defendants and for the entry of judgment in his favor on the issue of liability. Order modified, on the facts, by deleting (1) the second decretal paragraph thereof and (2) from the first decretal paragraph thereof the words: "and judgment is granted in favor of plaintiff on the issue of liability, together with the costs and disbursements to be taxed, and it is further”, and substituting therefor the following: "and a new trial is granted on the issue of liability.” As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Plaintiff moored his boat at defendant’s dock, pursuant to an agreement. He went to the dock on June 12, 1973 and climbed down into the 12-foot boat which was tied to the dock. While plaintiff was seated by its engine, defendant George E. Hall bent down underneath a dock lamppost to speak to him. Mr. Hall straightened, causing him to hit his head against the lamppost bulb. The parties agree that Mr. Hall then picked up a shovel and knocked broken pieces of glass out of the fixture, but disagree as to the force with which he did so. Pieces of glass struck plaintiff, causing injuries, which may be permanent, to his hand. Plaintiff testified that he was sitting 15 feet directly below when Mr. Hall struck the bulb. Mr. Hall testified that he was standing directly above the bow of the 12-foot boat and that plaintiff was sitting at its stern. We find that the jury’s verdict was not supported by any reasonable view of the evidence. The trial court should, in granting plaintiffs motion to set aside the verdict, have directed a new trial (see CPLR 4404, subd [a]). Damiani, J. P., Suozzi, Hawkins and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Anthony Ricco and Charles Indiviglia, Appellants, v. Robert E. Murphy, as Warden of Auburn Prison, Respondent.

Motion to reargue motion denied April 7, 1960 denied.
Exhibit 32



906 CERTIFICATION OF 20-F REPORT

OF

KIMBER RESOURCES INC

FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2007



The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Kimber Resources Inc. ("  Kimber "). This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the 20-F Report of Kimber for the year ended June 30, 2007.

We certify that such 20-F Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 20-F Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Kimber.

This Certification is executed as of  September 28, 2007.





|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|R. V. Longe
________________________________                                     
|Robert V. Longe
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)







|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Gordon Cummings
________________________________                                  
|Gordon Cummings
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of SendTec, Inc.

The subsidiaries of SendTec, Inc. (the Registrant) as of
March 29, 2007, are listed below:



|                                   |  |                          |  |             
|---------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | ------------
|Subsidiary                         |  | Ownership                |  | Jurisdiction
|                                   |  |                         
|1.      SendTec Acquisition Corp   |  | 100% owned by Registrant |  | Delaware    
|                                   |  |                         
|2.      RelationServe Access, Inc. |  | 100% owned by Registrant |  | Delaware    
|                                   |  |                         
|3.      Friendsand, Inc.           |  | 100% owned by Registrant |  | Delaware
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDevelopment of rotorcraft interior noise control concepts. Phase 2: Full scale testing, revision 1The phase 2 effort consisted of a series of ground and flight test measurements to obtain data for validation of the Statistical Energy Analysis (SEA) model. Included in the gound tests were various transfer function measurements between vibratory and acoustic subsystems, vibration and acoustic decay rate measurements, and coherent source measurements. The bulk of these, the vibration transfer functions, were used for SEA model validation, while the others provided information for characterization of damping and reverberation time of the subsystems. The flight test program included measurements of cabin and cockpit sound pressure level, frame and panel vibration level, and vibration levels at the main transmission attachment locations. Comparisons between measured and predicted subsystem excitation levels from both ground and flight testing were evaluated. The ground test data show good correlation with predictions of vibration levels throughout the cabin overhead for all excitations. The flight test results also indicate excellent correlation of inflight sound pressure measurements to sound pressure levels predicted by the SEA model, where the average aircraft speech interference level is predicted within 0.2 dB.Document ID19880005387Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsYoerkie, C. A.*(United Technologies Corp. Stratford, CT., United States)*Gintoli, P. J.*(United Technologies Corp. Stratford, CT., United States)*Moore, J. A.*(Cambridge Collaborative, Inc. Mass., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1986Subject CategoryAcousticsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-172594-REV-1NAS 1.26:172594-REV-1SER-760703Accession Number88N14769Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-16932Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19880005387.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 574.520 Performance reports. ( a ) *Formula grants.* For a formula grant recipient, the performance reporting requirements are specified in 24 CFR part 91.
( b ) *Competitive grants.* A grantee shall submit to HUD annually a report describing the use of the amounts received, including the number of individuals assisted, the types of assistance provided, data on emergency transfers requested under 24 CFR 5.2005(e), pertaining to victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking, including data on the outcomes of such requests, and any other information that HUD may require. Annual reports are required until all grant funds are expended.
[60 FR 1918, Jan. 5, 1995, as amended at 81 FR 80806, Nov. 16, 2016]
Editorial Note on Part 792
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 792 appear at 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999.

§ 792.202 PHA retention of proceeds. ( a ) Where the PHA is the principal party initiating or sustaining an action to recover amounts from tenants that are due as a result of fraud and abuse, the PHA may retain, the greater of: ( 1 ) Fifty percent of the amount it actually collects from a judgment, litigation (including settlement of lawsuit) or an administrative repayment agreement pursuant to, or incorporating the requirements of, § 982.555 of this title; or
( 2 ) Reasonable and necessary costs that the PHA incurs related to the collection from a judgment, litigation (including settlement of lawsuit) or an administrative repayment agreement pursuant to, or incorporating the requirements of, § 982.555 of this title. Reasonable and necessary costs include the costs of the investigation, legal fees and collection agency fees.
( b ) If HUD incurs costs on behalf of the PHA in obtaining the judgment, these costs must be deducted from the amount to be retained by the PHA.
[59 FR 9409, Feb. 28, 1994, as amended at 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999]
#### § 883.601 Applicability.

The provisions of this subpart apply to new construction and substantial rehabilitation projects using contract authority allocated under subpart B, Allocation and Assignment of Contract Authority, or processed and constructed under subpart D, Fast Track Procedures.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with this Annual Report of SNB Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, R. Darrell Brewer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated
March 31, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ R. Darrell BrewerR. Darrell BrewerChief Financial Officer
<page> EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION OF PRESEIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley
Cornerstone Fund IV L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
?Report?), I, Walter Davis, President of Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.









By:   /s/ Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:	President of Demeter Management Corporation,
			the general partner of the Partnership

Date:		November 14, 2006
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Mark
Pettie, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable, and that information contained in such
Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc.








/s/MARK PETTIE


Name:     Mark
Pettie


Title:       Chief Executive
Officer


Date:       June
13, 2008
#### KOEHLER, Appellant, v. McKIE, Tax Collector, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 1, 1905.)

Action by George Koehler against John McKie, as tax collector for west side sewer, etc. No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs.
#### § 574.440 Confidentiality.

The grantee shall agree, and shall ensure that each project sponsor agrees, to ensure the confidentiality of the name of any individual assisted under this part and any other information regarding individuals receiving assistance.
§ 91.515 Funding determinations by HUD. ( a ) *Formula funding.* The action plan submitted by the jurisdiction will be considered as the application for the CDBG, HOME, ESG, and HOPWA formula grant programs. The Department will make its funding award determination after reviewing the plan submission in accordance with § 91.500.
( b ) *Other funding.* For other funding, the jurisdiction must still respond to Notices of Funding Availability for the individual programs in order to receive funding.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2506-0117)