alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Rahul Pendse [RPendse@trinityconsultants.com]

Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 10:26 AM

To: Land, Eva

Cc: Carlson, Sara; Kathryn Maness (Kathryn.Maness@anadarko.com)

Subject: Discoverer Spirit - EGOM 2-year PSD/Title V Permit Application (Anadarko) 

Attachments: Summary of Main Engine Maintenance Schedule - EPA Submittal 091313.xlsx

Hello Eva,

In response to your email on July 30, 2013 and follow-up phone discussions, please find recommended 

maintenance practices for the main engines on the Discoverer Spirit drillship attached herewith. Please 

confirm the receipt of this email and let me or Sara Carlson of Anadarko know if you have any questions 

or need additional information. Thank you for cooperation. 

................................................................................................................

Rahul Pendse

Managing Consultant

Trinity Consultants – Baton Rouge

301 Main Street, Suite 900 | Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70825

Office: 225-346-4003 | Mobile: 714-454-0518

Email: rpendse@trinityconsultants.com

_________________________________________________________________________

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to

which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged

material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or

taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or

entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you

Received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material 

from any computer.

_________________________________________________________________________
### CM£\\b-.0S-CA-OI3<p8Wt^8ZJA/-tf ?£Tmokl££ RECEIVED IN COURTOF CRIMINAL APPEALS >& JAN 05 2015 § 0P THE SUftTE DP ~Eyp& AbelAcosta, Clerk $££iltoikiftL APfeflLS 'MftTtail ft*. EtfTEMSlQU OP TiME TO FlL£ ?DR 

### ^ MOU). ^dfcbdttftWU tCTTtoUER. m Pis ^ KhDTO^ Pc* w4 **>«*. ft m *f tws wrmou, }ni« s^ ^e ^ ife tai*^ I. 

### nans flPife fl^ffi fifj^agnt ^^Btiaa^^

"Re (m urns tenia) om flftw.i4.3hn, ' IE. 

## ^e tew Deidube w* a*» the penTM *_ te&no« ^e, B

&&UEST. FILED IN COURTOFCRIMINALAPPFa; c JAN 12 2015 Abel Acosta, Clerk'JflL VaH&MDT irtFOWlEft CFlfte bEQSod DF-tfte CGlifcr kf A$ft&£ IK flfrfcmiiB to CfcSE mmL?-Ute^iD,-3tort.- sn<!e ~w -w«e temiora. to& to4 flrremPTfue, To oam lgbal lkifc£» tavrM Tifff fc mil NOT &fftES»tr Mm.^ ufe fom»4 ft£ imEmwtf 

### uwabfeferm**. MS itettwer 6eto ite taw toEnao ^ teftout foe fions ite itimou fee JKOETtoa^ iZeukw (U Otoifc to.

RtmsHEe ?eo as

. TtJCJ'" IUo%333 

### "*»i IteWOMBtirOFCawwBLTuSKffi: CatTltttlE Of SOOCt

^^ ?&TlT(,e*4ER ppd-«/lb. Louise Pearekk ten CfiUfcrOf d£!ML ;fttfc«J3 ?,& fort U30t tou,7* m/i 

## E**s toe to itftoJ6 bng iwa, ^ MM tf ml "•»£ ft iCTto to bBtaMlAW toflU. ftflffi fl(£ Tft f^ UJfTtt TW£ »s * TSB Cfc MQ KikE, IT TB Tfe 4TrtMT7£W OfTJfe flttier. 

### *J*t Ort-TE-SW -Ms t^TK M BHUNtl TO m ffTlHZ MM& suuai

"£fl& DfflitMErtrofadmit just^t
### §55603. Multistate, State, Tribal, and regional transportation planning

(a) In General.—The Secretary, in consultation with Federal entities, State and local governments, Tribal governments, and appropriate private sector entities, may develop strategies to encourage the use of marine highway transportation for transportation of passengers and cargo.

(b) Strategies.—If the Secretary develops strategies under subsection (a), the Secretary may—

(1) assess the extent to which States, local governments, and Tribal governments include marine highway transportation and other marine transportation solutions in transportation planning;

(2) encourage State and Tribal departments of transportation to develop strategies, where appropriate, to incorporate marine highway transportation, ferries, and other marine transportation solutions for regional and interstate transport of freight and passengers in transportation planning; and

(3) encourage groups of States, Tribal governments, and multistate transportation entities to determine how marine highways can address congestion, bottlenecks, and other interstate transportation challenges.

(Added Pub. L. 117–263, div. C, title XXXV, §3521(b)(1), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3078.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 55603, added Pub. L. 110–140, title XI, §1121(a), Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1761, which related to an interagency board to identify and seek solutions to impediments hindering effective use of short sea transportation, was repealed by Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXIII [LXXXIII], §8332(d)(1), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4704.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPALFINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection withAmendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of RiskMetrics Group, Inc. (the “Registrant”)on Form 10-K-A for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.

 

Date: April 30, 2010

 

 
| /s/ DAVID M.  OBSTLER       |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|
| David M. Obstler                 |   |
| *(Principal  Financial Officer)* |   |

 

----
#### Nick Kesslering, appellant, v. Louis B. Larsen, appellee.

Gen. No. 28,511.

Suit for damages for automobile collision. Finding for defendant. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John Richardson, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed October 2, 1923.

Joseph O. McKiernan, for appellant. Bowles & Bowles, for appellee; Edmond W. Pottle, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.
|                                                             |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                             |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Mine or Operating Name/MSHA Identification Number | Section 104 S&S Citations | Section 104(b) Orders | Section 104(d) Citations and Orders | Section 110(b)(2) Violations | Section 107(a) Orders | ProposedMSHAAssessments (1) | Mining Related Fatalities | Received Notice of Pattern of Violations Under Section 104(e) (yes/no) | Received Notice of Potential to Have Pattern Under Section 104(e) (yes/no) | Legal Actions Pending as of Last Day of Period | Legal Actions Initiated During Period | Legal Actions Resolved During Period |
| Morgan City Grinding Plant/1601357                          | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $ | — |  | 0 | N | N | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Argenta Mine and Mill/2601152                               | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $ | — |  | 0 | N | N | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Corpus Christi Grinding Plant/4103112                       | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $ | — |  | 0 | N | N | 0 | 0 | 0 |

|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | Amounts included are the total dollar value of proposed assessments received from MSHA during the three months ended June 30, 2016, regardless of whether the assessment has been challenged or appealed.  Citations and orders can be contested and appealed, and as part of that process, are sometimes reduced in severity and amount, and sometimes dismissed.  The number of citations, orders, and proposed assessments vary by inspector and also vary depending on the size and type of the operation. |
----

|   | a. | complies      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b. | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition of the Company at February 28, 2009, and      the results of the Company’s operations for the quarter ended February 28,      2009. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                |   |   |   |                                                                              |
|-------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  July      24, 2009 |   |   |   | /s/      Sharon Farris                                                            |
|                                |   |   |   |                                                                              |
|                                |   |   |   | Sharon      Farris                                                                |
|                                |   |   |   | President,      Chief Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial    Officer |

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of SendTec, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul Soltoff, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Paul Soltoff             
|Paul Soltoff                 
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)
|March 29, 2007
Send money abroad 

with more confidence.

Costs of international money 

transfers are now easier to see.
When you send money to family, 

friends or others outside of the United 

States, do you know how much they’ll 

actually receive? Now it’s possible to 

know more before you send.

New protections apply when 

you send money abroad. 

Before you pay, you will learn more 

about: 

• The exchange rate

• The fees and taxes you’ll pay

• The amount that will be received

You will also receive information 

about:

• When the money will be available 

at its destination

• Your right to cancel the transfer 

• How to get help if errors are made

• How to submit a complaint

Many money transfer providers must 

provide this new information, but not 

all. Other protections also may be 

available to you, depending on how 

you send the money and the laws in 

your state.

To learn more, call the Consumer Financial 

Protection Bureau at 855-411-CFPB (2372)

or visit consumerfinance.gov/askcfpb
### §§65, 66. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–287, §10(b), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3401

Section 65, act Sept. 3, 5, 1916, ch. 436, §1, 39 Stat. 721, established eight hour work day for employees of railroads. See section 28301 of Title 49, Transportation.

Section 66, act Sept. 3, 5, 1916, ch. 436, §4, 39 Stat. 722, provided penalty for violation of section 65 of this title. See section 28302 of Title 49, Transportation.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Act Sept. 3, 5, 1916, ch. 436, 39 Stat. 721, which enacted sections 65 and 66 of this title, was popularly known as the "Adamson Law".
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 48 (Monday, March 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14507]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5807]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Agency Information Collection Activities Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Intent to Renew; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a reference in the text of the 30-day 
Notice of Intent to Renew an agency collection of information, 
Regulations Governing Bankruptcies of Commodity Brokers (OMB Control 
No. 3038-0021). The notice that is being corrected was published in the 
Federal Register of March 5, 2012, 77 FR 13101.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martin B. White, Office of the General 
Counsel, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 1155 21st Street NW., 
Washington, DC 20581, (202) 418-5129; Fax: (202) 418-5567; email: 
mwhite@cftc.gov.

Correction

    In the Notice of Intent to Renew, beginning on page 13101 in the 
issue of March 5, 2012, make the following correction. On page 13101 in 
the middle column in the third paragraph under SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION replace the sentence ``The Federal Register notice with a 
60-day comment period soliciting comments on this collection of 
information was published on December 29, 2012 (73 FR 81916).'' with 
the sentence ``The Federal Register notice with a 60-day comment period 
soliciting comments on this collection of information was published on 
December 29, 2011 (76 FR 81916).''

    Dated: March 6, 2012.
David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-5807 Filed 3-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
### **CHAPTER 83—MASTERS AND OFFICERS**

Sec.
8301.
Minimum number of licensed individuals.
8302.
Staff department.
[8303.
Repealed.]
8304.
Implementing the Officers' Competency Certificates Convention, 1936.

#### Historical and Revision Notes

For certain vessels of the United States, chapter 83 prescribes the minimum number of licensed individuals (including masters), establishes the staff department consisting of medical and clerical personnel, restricts service under certain licenses issued without examination, and implements the Officers' Competency Certificates Convention of 1936.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2021**—Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8503(a)(1), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4747, struck out item 8303 "Service under licenses issued without examination".
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

December 8, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00581

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF MARY JANE HARGROVE
,

From the County Court at Law, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17

- 002

- G Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R
In her October 13, 2017 notification of late record, court reporter Patricia Abeyta advised the court that she had broken her right humerus, was temporarily unable to work, and requested a sixty

- day extension of time to file the record until December 29, 2017. After we granted in part her first motion for extension of time to file the record, the reporter’s record was due to be filed with this court on November 29, 2017. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.3(c) (limiting an extension in an ordinary appeal to thirty days).
On Dece mber 6, 2017, Appellant filed with this court a copy of a letter addressed to Patricia Abeyta indicating that , despite multiple attempts, Appellant has been unable to contact h er regarding the status of the reporter’s record. To date, the reporter’s record has not been filed. We ORDER court reporter Patricia Abeyta to file in this court the reporter’s record
, or a second request for extension of time to file the record
, not lat er than FIF T E EN DAYS from the date of this order

. See id. If the reporter’s record or a second request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record is not filed as ordered, a show cause order shall issue directing Patricia Abeyta to appear

on a day certain and show cause why s he should not be held in contempt for failing to file the record or respond to this order

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.3(c); see also T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 21.002 (West 2004) (authorizing contemnor punishment up to “a fine of not more than $500 or confinement in the county jail for not more than six months, or both such a fine and confinement in jail ”); Johnson v. State , 151 S.W.3d 193, 195

– 96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) (noting the court’s previous action holding a court reporter i n contempt for “repeatedly fail[ing] to prepare and file the record” and “order[ing] him incarcerated .

. . until the record was finished”).We direct t he clerk of this court to cause a copy of this order to be served on Patricia

Abeyta by certified mail, return receipt requested, with delivery restricted to addressee only, or give other personal notice of this order with proof of delivery.

___________________________ ______ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 8th day of December, 2017

.

____________________ _______________ KEITH E. HOTTLE
, Clerk of Court
Exhibit
13.2





CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Annual Report of TOP Ships Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “SEC”) on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stamatios
N. Tsantanis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




This
certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not
for any other purpose.  A signed original of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.




Date:
May 21, 2008




/s/ Stamatios N.
Tsantani
 Stamatios
N. Tsantanis
 Chief
Financial Officer
### §31303. Certain civil actions not authorized

If a mortgage covers a vessel and additional property that is not a vessel, this chapter does not authorize a civil action in rem to enforce the rights of the mortgagee under the mortgage against the additional property.

(Pub. L. 100–710, title I, §102(c), Nov. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 4740.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 31303 | 46:954(b) |

Section 31303 makes it clear that, if a mortgage covers a vessel and additional property that is not a vessel, this chapter does not authorize a civil action in rem in admiralty to enforce rights against the additional property. This section makes no substantive change to law.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1989, with certain exceptions and qualifications, see section 107 of Pub. L. 100–710, set out as a note under section 31301 of this title.
### §51503. Regional maritime academies

The Governors of the States cooperating to sponsor a regional maritime academy shall designate in writing one of those States to conduct the affairs of that academy. A regional maritime academy is eligible for assistance from the United States Government on the same basis as a State maritime academy sponsored by a single State.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(b), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1577.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 51503 | 46 App.:1295c(b). | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title XIII, §1304(b), as added Pub. L. 96–453, §2, Oct. 15, 1980, 94 Stat. 2003. |

Section

The reference to territories is omitted as unnecessary because of the definition of "State" in chapter 1 of the revised title.
#### § 891.823 HUD review and approval.

HUD will review and may approve or disapprove the firm commitment application and mixed finance proposal.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HALSEY MINOR, an individual,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CHRISTIE’S INC., a New York corporation, 

and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,

Defendants. /

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

 /

CHRISTIE, MANSON & WOODS, LTD., 

a United Kingdom corporation,

Plaintiff,

 v.

HALSEY MINOR, an individual,

and ROES 1 through 20, inclusive,

Defendants. /

No. C 08-05445 WHA (Lead Case)

Consolidated with:

No. C 09-00471 WHA

SECOND AMENDED

JUDGMENT

Based on the accompanying jury verdicts, judgment is hereby entered as follows: 

1. In Case No. 08-05445, judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff

Halsey Minor and against defendant Christie’s Inc. in the total amount of

$8,570,001. 

Case 3:09-cv-00471-WHA Document 61 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. In Case No. 08-05445, judgment is entered in favor of

counterclaimant Christie’s Inc. and against counterdefendant Halsey Minor in the

total amount of $497,086.85. 

3. In Case No. 09-00471, judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff

Christie, Manson & Woods and against defendant Halsey Minor in the total

amount of $1,173,492.43.

4. As between the parties to this action, Halsey Minor has the

superior right to ownership and possession of the April artworks.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 22, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-00471-WHA Document 61 Filed 07/22/10 Page 2 of 2
#### § 320.23 Eligible issuers.

Any corporation, trust, partnership, or other entity with a net worth acceptable to the Association as set forth in the Bond Guide, which has the capability to assemble acceptable and eligible mortgages in sufficient quantity to support required minimum issuances of securities and which meets such other requirements as are set forth in the Bond Guide, may be approved to issue and service bond-type securities guaranteed by the Association. Further, the Association reserves the right to limit the number of issuers in the interest of conducting an orderly market of securities of this type.