alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §5107. Delegation of authority

(a) The Secretary shall delegate to the American Bureau of Shipping or other similarly qualified organizations the authority to assign load lines, survey vessels, determine that load lines are marked correctly, and issue load line certificates under this chapter.

(b) Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, a decision of an organization delegated authority under subsection (a) of this section related to the assignment of a load line may be appealed to the Secretary.

(c) For a vessel intended to be engaged on a foreign voyage, the Secretary may delegate to another country that is a party to the International Convention on Load Lines, 1966, the authority to assign load lines, survey vessels, determine that the load lines are marked correctly, and issue an International Load Line Certificate (1966).

(d) The Secretary may terminate a delegation made under this section after giving written notice to the organization.

(Pub. L. 99–509, title V, §5101(2), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1916.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### Revised section 5107

Source: Section (U.S. Code) 46 App. U.S.C. 86d, 88b.

Section 5107(a) requires the Secretary to delegate the performance of various load line functions to the American Bureau of Shipping or other similarly qualified organizations. In providing for the delegation to a "similarly qualified organization," the Committee expects that the Secretary will ensure that that organization complies with the same stringent standards and requirements for conducting business that apply to the American Bureau of Shipping.

Section 5107(b) permits an appeal to the Secretary of a decision by an organization that has received delegated authority. This ensures that the Secretary has full oversight of the delegated load line functions.

Section 5107(c) permits the Secretary to delegate various load line functions to another country for vessels that are engaged on a foreign voyage, provided that the country is a party to the International Convention on Load Lines, 1966.

Section 5107(d) clarifies the Secretary's authority to revoke a delegation at any time without cause. This authority is given so that no delay occurs administratively in revoking a delegation whenever the Secretary decides a revocation is warranted.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350), the
undersigned, David J Cutler, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of Aspeon, Inc., (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

The  Quarterly  Report  Form 10QSB for the three  months  and six  months  ended
December  31,  2004 of the  Company  (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1034,
and the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:       November 9, 2005

By /s/David J Cutler
   ----------------------
David J Cutler
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1


                  INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in this
Registration Statement of Baker Hughes Incorporated on Form S-8
relating to the Baker Hughes Incorporated Supplemental Retirement
Plan of our report dated November 13, 1996, incorporated by
reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Baker Hughes
Incorporated for the year ended September 30, 1996.



Deloitte & Touche LLP



Houston, Texas
January 13, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                             477
<SECURITIES>                                       270
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2084
<ALLOWANCES>                                        33
<INVENTORY>                                        560
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                            2158
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1024
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5820
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                           1992
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          4
<COMMON>                                          2140
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1324)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      5820
<SALES>                                           1837
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1924
<CGS>                                             1544
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1825
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    49
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     5
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  32
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     99
<INCOME-TAX>                                        38
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 61
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        61
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .92<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .91
<FN>
<F1>The company has addopted an unclassified presentation in the Statement of
Financial Condition.
<F2>Amount represents Basic Earnings Per Share.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-51337

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BRYAN RANDALL BARRETT,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:16-CR-138-1

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Bryan Randall Barrett has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Barrett has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief 

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 18, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-51337 Document: 00514122244 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2017
No. 16-51337

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-51337 Document: 00514122244 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2017
CALYON NEW YORK BRANCH
  
  Borrower Agent Loan
Agreement
   Section 1.1
 Section 1.1




---



##### 



-2-




---



##### 



Very truly yours,CALYON NEW YORK BRANCH,as AgentBy:
    /S/Name:
    David BowersTitle:
    Managing DirectorBy:

/S/Name:
    Joseph A. AsciollaTitle:
    Managing Director  GREAT WOLF WILLIAMSBURG SPE, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability companyBy:
    /s/Name:Title:




---



##### 



Very truly yours,CALYON NEW YORK BRANCH,as AgentBy:

/s/Name:Title:By:

/s/Name:Title:  GREAT WOLF WILLIAMSBURG SPE, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability companyBy:
    /s/Name:
    James CalderTitle:
    Treasurer




---



##### 



CALYON NEW YORK BRANCHBy:
    /S/Name:
    David BowersTitle:
    Managing DirectorBy:
    /S/Name:
    Joseph A. AsciollaTitle:
    Managing DirectorCAPMARK BANKBy:

/s/Name:Title:




---



##### 



The undersigned, the current Lenders under the Loan Agreement, hereby join in the foregoing
letter agreement.
 CALYON NEW YORK BRANCHBy:

/s/Name:Title:By:

/s/Name:Title:CAPMARK BANKBy:
    /S/Name:
    Matthew HoysaTitle:
    Vice President Amendment Document




---



##### 



GWR OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.L.L.P.,
a Delaware limited liability limited partnershipBy:
    GWR OP General Partner, LLC, its general partnerBy:
    /S/Name:
    James CalderTitle:
    TreasurerGREAT WOLF RESORTS, INC.,a Delaware
corporationBy:
    /S/Name:
    James CalderTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
September 18, 2006




VIA EDGAR LINK
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20549

	Re:	Symetra Deferred Variable Annuity Account (811-04961)

Dear Commissioners:

	On behalf of Symetra Life Insurance Company and the Symetra Deferred
Variable Annuity Account, we hereby submit, pursuant to Rule 30b2-1(b) under
the Investment Company Act of 1940, that the Account's semi-annual report for
the period ending June 30, 2006 has been transmitted to contract owners
accordingly.

	We incorporate by reference the following annual report for the
underlying funds:

		Filer/Entity:  DWS Variable Series I
		Registration No.:  811-04257
		CIK No.:  0000764797
		Accession No.:  0000088053-06-000931
		Date of Filing:  08/29/2006

		Filer/Entity:  Pioneer Variable Contracts Trust
		Registration Statement:  811-08786
		CIK No.:  0000930709
		Accession No.:  000093709-06-000078
		Date of Filing:  08/29/2006


		Filer/Entity:  DWS Variable Series II
		Registration No.:  811-05002
		CIK No.:  0000810573
		Accession No.:  0000088053-06-000940
		Date of Filing:  08/24/2006


If you have any questions regarding this filing, please contact me
at (425) 256-8021.

					Sincerely,

					/s/George C. Pagos

					George C. Pagos
					Vice President and General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      16,113,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,994,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,011,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,039,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,895,000
<PP&E>                                       5,365,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,382,380
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,045,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,604,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       188,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,075,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                36,045,000
<SALES>                                     19,119,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            31,221,000
<CGS>                                        6,809,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,195,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,347,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              95,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,003,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,991,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,012,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,012,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26
        

</TABLE>
### §46102. Quorum

A vacancy or vacancies in the membership of the Federal Maritime Commission do not impair the power of the Commission to execute its functions. The affirmative vote of a majority of the Commissioners serving on the Commission is required to dispose of any matter before the Commission.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §4, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1489, §302; renumbered §46102, Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXVI [LXXXVI], §8605(a)(3), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4765.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 302 | 46 App.:1111 note. | Reorg. Plan No. 7 of 1961, eff. Aug. 12, 1961, §102(d), 75 Stat. 840; Pub. L. 105–258, title II, §202, Oct. 14, 1998, 112 Stat. 1915. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 renumbered section 302 of this title as this section.
#### Edward Davis v. New York City Transit Authority.

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted, insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard upon a typewritten or mimeographed record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, upon condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed record and one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points on the attorney for respondent and flies 6 typewritten copies or 19 mimeographed copies of both the record on appeal and appellant’s points with this court. The typing or mimeographing of the exhibits is dispensed with on condition that the originals or photostatic copies of said exhibits are filed with this court on or before the Wednesday preceding the first day of the term for which the appeal is noticed for argument. Abraham Pokorny, Esq., of 66 Court Street, Brooklyn 1, New York, is assigned as counsel for the appellant for the purposes of the appeal. Order filed. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.
Exhibit 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We have issued our report dated June 27, 2019, with respect to the financial statements and supplemental information included in the Annual Report of Navistar, Inc. 401(k) Plan for Represented Employees on Form 11-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. We consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of Navistar International Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 333-162266).


/s/ Grant Thornton LLP


Chicago, Illinois


June 27, 2019
§ 882.807 Housing assistance payments contract. ( a ) *Time of execution.* Upon PHA acceptance of the unit(s) and certifications pursuant to § 882.507, the Contract will be executed by the Owner and the PHA. The effective date must be no earlier than the PHA inspection which provides the basis for acceptance as specified in § 882.507(e).
( b ) *Term of contract.* The contract for any unit rehabilitated in accordance with this program must be for a term of 10 years. The contract must give the HA the option to renew the contract for an additional 10 years.
( c ) *Changes in contract rents from agreement.* The contract rents may be higher or lower than those specified in the Agreement, in accordance with § 882.805(d).
( d ) *Unleased unit(s).* At the time of execution of the Contract, the Owner will be required to submit a list of dwelling unit(s) leased and not leased as of the effective date of the Contract.
( e ) *Contract rents at end of rehabilitation loan term.* For a contract in which the initial contract rent was based upon a loan term shorter than 10 years, the contract must provide for reduction of the contract rent effective with the rent for the month following the end of the term of the rehabilitation loan. The amount of the reduction will be the monthly cost of amortization of the rehabilitation loan. This reduction should result in a new contract rent equal to the base rent plus all subsequent adjustments.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2502-0367) [61 FR 48057, Sept. 11, 1996, as amended at 63 FR 23856, Apr. 30, 1998]
##### 



Exhibit 99.2 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCEPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2004-22 (the Trust) I, Nancy H. Forte, a duly elected and acting officer of Citibank, N.A. (Indenture Trustee),
do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture Trustee, that: 1. I have reviewed and examined the performance by the Indenture Trustee of the application of
trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section
6.06 of the Indenture pursuant to which the Trusts notes were issued during the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2004 (the Relevant Year); and 2. Based upon my review and examination described in 1 above, and except as provided in the
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Compliance, dated March 15, 2005,
prepared by the Ernst & Young LLP substantially in accordance with Section 4.05 of the Expense and
Indemnity Agreement, to the best of my knowledge, the application of trust money collected by the
Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the Indenture was
performed in accordance with the terms of the Indenture throughout the Relevant Year. CITIBANK, N.A., as Indenture Trustee By:
    
    /s/ Nancy H. ForteName: Nancy H. ForteTitle: Assistant Vice PresidentDate:
    
    March 29, 2005
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Annual Report of Orgral Techologies Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending May 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Helena
Heit, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Helena Heit
--------------------------
Helena Heit
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer

September 13, 2005
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Cuthbert Eastman, Appellant, v. J. Edwin La Vallee, as Warden of Clinton Prison, Respondent.

Appeal by the relator from an order of the Supreme Court, Clinton County, which dismissed a writ of habeas corpus. The relator was indicted in March, 1955 for violation of the Public Health Law with respect to narcotic drugs. During the course of his trial thereon in June, 1955 a mistrial was declared on the motion of relator’s counsel. Thereafter on November 3, 1955 a motion for the dismissal of the indictment was granted with permission to submit the matter to another Grand Jury. An order dismissing the indictment was thereafter signed on November 14, 1955. In the meantime the Grand Jury returned another indictment charging relator with the same crime as did the first. The relator was tried, convicted and sentenced under this second indictment. The petition *551for the present writ of habeas corpus was based on the allegation of double jeopardy. On the return date the Attorney-General was granted time in which to produce the decision granting permission to resubmit the relator’s case to the Grand Jury. Thereafter that was done and the court below dismissed the writ. There is no merit in the relator’s claim of double jeopardy. This is not a situation where the first trial was terminated without legal and justifiable cause nor without the relator’s consent. The relator moved for the mistrial and he may not now complain that his motion was granted. The matter was resubmitted to the Grand Jury with the relator being tried on the indictment resulting therefrom. There is further no merit in relator’s contention that he was denied a proper hearing on the return of the writ. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,676,940
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  611,284
<ALLOWANCES>                                    66,489
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,587,994
<PP&E>                                       2,261,009
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,159,521
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,027,746
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,870,827
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,715
<COMMON>                                         6,228
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,087,716
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,027,746
<SALES>                                      1,210,065
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,210,065
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,264,198
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               588,681
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                55,779
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,838
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,642,815)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,642,815)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.77)


</TABLE>
§ 583.105 Grants for acquisition and rehabilitation. ( a ) *Use.* HUD will grant funds to recipients to: ( 1 ) Pay a portion of the cost of the acquisition of real property selected by the recipients for use in the provision of supportive housing or supportive services, including the repayment of any outstanding debt on a loan made to purchase property that has not been used previously as supportive housing or for supportive services;
( 2 ) Pay a portion of the cost of rehabilitation of structures, including cost-effective energy measures, selected by the recipients to provide supportive housing or supportive services; or
( 3 ) Pay a portion of the cost of acquisition and rehabilitation of structures, as described in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section.
( b ) *Amount.* The maximum grant available for acquisition, rehabilitation, or acquisition and rehabilitation is the lower of: ( 1 ) $200,000; or
( 2 ) The total cost of the acquisition, rehabilitation, or acquisition and rehabilitation minus the applicant's contribution toward the cost.
( c ) *Increased amounts.* In areas determined by HUD to have high acquisition and rehabilitation costs, grants of more than $200,000, but not more than $400,000, may be available.