alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 203.268 Pro rata payment of periodic MIP. ( a ) If the insurance contract is terminated before the due date of the initial MIP, the mortgagee shall pay a portion of the MIP prorated from the beginning of amortization, as defined in § 203.251, to the date of termination.
( b ) If the insurance contract is terminated after the due date of the initial MIP, the mortgagee shall pay a portion of the current annual MIP prorated from the due date of the last annual MIP to the date of termination.
( c ) A pro rata MIP shall not be due or payable where the mortgagee notifies the Commissioner that foreclosure or other action to acquire the property has been completed and that the property will not be conveyed to the Commissioner in exchange for insurance benefits. Any MIP due and paid after the institution of foreclosure or the date the property was otherwise acquired by the mortgagee will be refunded to the mortgagee upon receipt by the Commissioner of the notice from the mortgagee that the property will not be conveyed to the Commissioner.
[48 FR 28805, June 23, 1983, as amended at 61 FR 37801, July 19, 1996]
EX-10.2


  Exhibit 10.2 

  	
	[***] Certain information in this document has been omitted from this exhibit because it is both (i) not material and (ii) customarily and actually treated by the registrant as private or confidential.



   

  SECOND AMENDMENT TO COLLABORATION AND LICENSE AGREEMENT

  This Second Amendment to Collaboration and License Agreement (this “Second Amendment”) amends the Collaboration and License Agreement dated June 1, 2022, by and between Repare Therapeutics Inc., a Canadian corporation, on the one hand, and Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., a New Jersey corporation, and F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, a Swiss company, on the other hand (the “Agreement”), as previously amended on October 7, 2022. This Amendment is made and entered into as of October 7, 2022 (the “Second Amendment Date”). Capitalized terms used herein and not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.

   

  INTRODUCTION

  WHEREAS, in Section 5.1(d)(i) of the Agreement, the Parties agreed to negotiate and enter into the Repare Trial Collaboration Agreement within [***] of the Effective Date of the Agreement.

   

  WHEREAS, the Parties, by mutual agreement, now wish [***];

   

  NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants

   

  1.Section 5.1(d)(i) of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


   

  “(i)	No later than [***], the Parties shall negotiate in good faith and enter into an agreement governing the Parties’ rights and obligations with respect to Repare Trials, [***] (such data, “Repare Trial Data,” and such agreement, the “Repare Trial Collaboration Agreement”). To the extent there is any conflict between the terms of any executed Repare Trial Collaboration Agreement and the terms of this Agreement, the Repare Trial Collaboration Agreement shall control with respect to the rights and obligations of the Parties with respect to Repare Trials. However, no failure by the Parties to enter into a Repare Trial Collaboration Agreement will limit Repare’s right to conduct Repare Trials in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.”

   

  2.As amended by the Second Amendment, The Agreement remains un full force and effect. 


   

  3.This Second Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts (either manually or by facsimile), each of which shall be deemed to be an original, an all of which taken together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument.


   

  

  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Second Amendment as of the Second Amendment Date.

   

  REPARE THERAPEUTICS INC.

   

  By:   /s/ Steve Forte	

  Name: Steve Forte

  Title: EVP, Chief Financial Officer

   

  By:   /s/ Lloyd M. Segal	

  Name: Lloyd M. Segal

  Title: President and CEO

   

  HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC.

   

  By:   /s/ John Parise	

   Name: John Parise

  Title: Authorized Signatory

   

  F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD

   

  By:   /s/ Claire Steers	

   Name: Claire Steers

  Title: Global Asset and Alliance Management Director

   

  By:   /s/ Hannah Boehm	

   Name: Hannah Boehm

  Title: Legal Counsel
§ 904.103 Development. ( a ) *Financial framework.* The LHA shall finance development or acquisition by sale of its notes (bond financing shall not be used) in the amount of the Minimum Development Cost. Payment of the debt service on the notes is assured by the HUD commitment to provide annual contributions.
( b ) *Maximum total development cost.* The maximum total development cost stated in the ACC is the maximum amount authorized for development of a project and shall not exceed the amount approved in accordance with § 941.406(a) of this chapter.
( c ) *Contractual framework.* There are three basic contracts: ( 1 ) An Annual Contributions Contract containing “Special Provisions For Turnkey III Homeownership Opportunity Project,” Form HUD-53010C (see Appendix I);
( 2 ) A Homebuyers Ownership Opportunity Agreement (see Appendix II) which sets forth the respective rights and obligations of the low-income occupants and the LHA, including conditions for achieving homeownership; and
( 3 ) A Recognition Agreement (see Appendix II of Subpart D of this part) between the LHA and the HBA under which the LHA agrees to recognize the HBA as the established representative of the homebuyers.
( d ) *Community Participation Committee* (*CPC*). In the necessary development of citizens' participation in and understanding of the Turnkey III program, the LHA should consider formation and use of a CPC to assist the community and the LHA in the development and support of the Turnkey III program. The CPC shall be a voluntary group comprised of representatives of the low-income population primarily and may also include representatives of community service organizations.
[39 FR 10966, Mar. 22, 1974. Redesignated at 40 FR 15580, Apr. 7, 1975, and amended at 47 FR 39482, Sept. 8, 1982. Redesignated at 49 FR 6714, Feb. 23, 1984, and amended at 53 FR 41598, Oct. 24, 1988]
### §715. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–473, §4(b), Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1466

Section, Pub. L. 93–236, title II, §205, Jan. 2, 1974, 87 Stat. 993, Pub. L. 94–5, §3, Feb. 28, 1975, 89 Stat. 7; Pub. L. 94–210, title III, §309, Feb. 5, 1976, 90 Stat. 57, established Rail Services Planning Office.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Georgia Farmer et al., Respondents, v. Coffee Instants, Inc., et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, *841Respondent.

Appeal by the employer and its carrier from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board making an award of death benefits to the deceased employee’s mother and father for partial dependency. The decedent was scalded with hot steam in the course of his employment on March 10, 1957 and as a result of the injuries sustained died on September 2, 1957. His salary for the employer herein was $90 per week but he had only been so employed, since February 11, 1957. The woman with, whom the decedent had been living, testified that previous to that he had been unemployed for six months and that prior to that he had been employed at a salary of $52 per week.. She testified that she supported him during the six months period of unemployment although their arrangement called for him to buy food and pay the rent. She knew; nothing about the decedent sending money to his parents in Mississippi, and she testified that he had been prone to gambling his money away. The decedent’s mother and father testified that the decedent sent them $100 to $150 per month in cash or money orders and that they were dependent on those sums. The parents testified that the family income varied from $130 to $170 a month and' that the family expenses averaged $130 per month. The decedent’s parents steadfastly maintained that he had sent them $100 to $150 per month or about $25 per week. While such testimony might ordinarily be sufficient, when viewed against the evidence of the decedent’s earnings and financial condition, it becomes incredible. The decedent had been unemployed for a period of six months but the mother and father gave no indication of any such period when they received no money from him. In fact the woman with whom the decedent lived testified that she held two jobs in order to support herself and the decedent. Prior to the period of unemployment the decedent was only earning $52 per week. Further, as the figures extracted from the record by the board indicate, the parents’ testimony showed that the family’s income exceeded expenses at and before the time of the accident. Such a situation certainly does not indicate dependency. Dependency must be determined as of the date of the accident. While dependency is ordinarily a question of fact for the board there is here a lack of any substantial evidence to support the finding of dependency. Decision and award reversed and claim dismissed, without costs.

In decisions Nos. 6-51: Present—Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
#### City of Chicago, appellee, v. John Doe, appellant.

Gen. No. 28,684.

Suit against City of Chicago. Judgment for city. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. J. W. Sehulman, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district.

Affirmed for failure of appellant to file record.

See City v. Salmitsky, 210 Ill. App. 159.

Opinion filed June 25, 1923.

No appearance for appellant. No appearance for appellee.

Per Curiam,,
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION

FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF

1 C 09-02470 JSW (EMC)

EDMUND J. FERDINAND III (Pro Hac Vice)

GRIMES & BATTERSBY, LLP

488 Main Avenue

Norwalk, CT 06851

Telephone: (203) 849-8300

Facsimile: (203) 849-9300

e-mail: ferdinand@gandb.com

ROBERT E. WHITE (Cal. Bar. No. 78567)

LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT E. WHITE

177 Post Street, Suite 890

San Francisco, CA 94108

Telephone: (415) 788-6151

Facsimile: (415) 788-6154

e-mail: rew@rwhitesf.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,

CAVIT CANTINA VITICOLTORI CONSORZIO

CANTINE SOCIALI DEL TRENTINO SOCIETA

COOPERATIVA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CAVIT CANTINA VITICOLTORI

CONSORZIO CANTINE SOCIALI DEL

TRENTINO SOCIETA COOPERATIVA,

Plaintiff and

Counterdefendant,

vs.

BROWMAN FAMILY VINEYARDS,

INC.

Defendant and

Counterclaimant.

CASE NO. C 09-02470 JSW (EMC)

CASE NO. C 3:09-01070 JSW (EMC)

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE

RELIEF RE ORDER REGARDING

CONSOLIDATION OF CASES DATED

3/5/10 AND CONFLICTING “AMENDED

ORDER REFERRING CASE FOR

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE” DATED

6/9/10

(CIV. L.R. 7-11)

Upon reading the motion of Plaintiff and counterdefendant CAVIT CANTINA

VITICOLTORI CONSORZIOCANTINE SOCIALI DEL TRENTINO SOCIETA

COOPERATIVA [hereinafter “Cavit”] for administrative relief pursuant to Civ. L.R. 7-11, to

reinstate the Court’s order of March 5, 2010 providing that all filings in these consolidated

matters be in Case No. 09-02470 rather than in Case No. 09-01070, the supporting declaration of

Edmund J. Ferdinand, III, and good cause appearing therefor,

Case 3:09-cv-01070-JSW Document 82 Filed 07/19/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:09-cv-01070-JSW Document81 Filed07/13/10 Page1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION

FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF

2 C 09-02470 JSW (EMC)

IT IS THEREFORE HEREBY ORDERED that all future filings in these

consolidated matters be in Civil Action No. C 09-02470 JSW (EMC) and that Cavit be designated

as the plaintiff in these consolidated matters at the trial of these matters.

Dated: July ___, 2010.

 

HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

e:\grimes\adminrelief-proposed-order-02

Case3:09-cv-01070-JSW Document81 Filed07/13/10 Page2 of 2

19

Case 3:09-cv-01070-JSW Document 82 Filed 07/19/10 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 15.2




            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
333-127086  on Form F-3 of our report  dated  April 12,  2007,  relating  to the
consolidated financial statements of Top Tankers Inc. and subsidiaries appearing
in this  Annual  Report  on Form 20-F of Top  Tankers  Inc.  for the year  ended
December 31, 2006.

/s/ Deloitte
-------------------------
Deloitte., Hadjipavlou, Sofianos & Cambanis S.A.
Athens, Greece
April 20, 2007.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3225

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 3, 4-Dichlorobenzonitrile. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 12, 2005

Mr. BUYER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 3, 4-

Dichlorobenzonitrile.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. 3, 4-DICHLOROBENZONITRILE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.85 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 3, 4-Dichlorobenzonitrile) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/

7 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2

•HR 3225 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### § 891.220 Prohibited facilities.

Projects may not include facilities for infirmaries, nursing stations, or spaces for overnight care.
Exhibit 13.2

                      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with the Annual Report of TOP Tankers Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Stamatios N. Tsantanis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Date: June 11, 2007


/s/ Stamatios N. Tsantanis
--------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
### §2303a. Post serious marine casualty alcohol testing

(a) The Secretary shall establish procedures to ensure that after a serious marine casualty occurs, alcohol testing of crew members or other individuals responsible for the operation or other safety-sensitive functions of the vessel or vessels involved in such casualty is conducted no later than 2 hours after the casualty occurs, unless such testing cannot be completed within that time due to safety concerns directly related to the casualty.

(b) The procedures in subsection (a) shall require that if alcohol testing cannot be completed within 2 hours of the occurrence of the casualty, such testing shall be conducted as soon thereafter as the safety concerns in subsection (a) have been adequately addressed to permit such testing, except that such testing may not be required more than 8 hours after the casualty occurs.

(Added Pub. L. 105–383, title III, §304(d)(1), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3419; amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8505(b)(1), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4751.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "individuals" for "persons".
Exhibit 31
                                  ----------

                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------

I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of CWMBS, Inc., CHL
Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2004-14;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required
to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included
in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the master
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon
my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement,
and except as disclosed in the reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its
obligations under that agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the master
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review
in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York, as
Trustee.


Date: March 28, 2005

                                        /s/ Steve Bailey
                                        ----------------
                                        Steve Bailey
                                        Senior Managing Director
§ 50.18 General. ( a ) The Departmental Environmental Clearance Officer (DECO) shall establish a prescribed format to be used to document compliance with NEPA and the Federal laws and authorities cited in § 50.4. The DECO may prescribe alternative formats as necessary to meet specific program needs.
( b ) HUD may, from time to time, complete programmatic reviews that further avoid the necessity of complying with the laws and authorities in § 50.4 on a property-by-property basis.
[61 FR 50916, Sept. 27, 1996, as amended at 79 FR 49228, Aug. 20, 2014]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CSBN 44332)

United States Attorney

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CSBN 163973)

Chief, Criminal Division

NATALIE K. WIGHT (ORBN 35576)

Special Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, 11th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94102

Telephone: 415.436.6937

Facsimile: 415.436.7234

Email: natalie.wight@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for United States of America

EDGAR EUGENE PAGE (CSBN 231147)

KATHLEEN C. PAGE (CSBN 233040)

Page & Page Attorneys at Law

Post Office Box 2837

San Francisco, CA 94126

Telephone: 415.986.4558

Facsimile: 415.986.4566

Email: pagepagelaw@comcast.net

Attorneys for the Claimant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff,

v.

ONE HEWLETT PACKARD PAVILION

LAPTOP (SERIAL NO. CNF75237NC),

ADAPTOR, AND VISUAL DEPICTIONS

ON THE HARD DRIVE,

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 09-CV-02664-WHA

JOINT STATUS REPORT 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO

CONTINUE STAY AND 

RESCHEDULE CMC

The United States and counsel for the Claimant hereby request to continue the Stay of the civil

forfeiture proceedings, as ordered by the Court on September 21, 2009. The related criminal

action, Case No. 09-CR-00946-JSW, is still pending with a trial date of September 20, 2010. 

Accordingly, the parties request that the Court vacate the Case Management Conference

JOINT STATUS REPORT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE CMC

(09-CV-02664-WHA)

Case 3:09-cv-02664-WHA Document 27 Filed 07/09/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

scheduled for July 15, 2010, at 11:00 a.m., and reschedule the Case Management Conference for

October 7, 2010, at 11:00 a.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard by the Court. 

STIPULATED AND RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY:

DATED: July 7, 2010 __________/S______________________

NATALIE K. WIGHT

Special Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: July 7, 2010 __________/S______________________

EDGAR EUGENE PAGE

Attorney for Claimant Andrew Hanson

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation between the parties and for good cause shown, the Case

Management Conference scheduled for Thursday July 15, 2010, is hereby vacated. The Case

Management Conference is rescheduled for _______________________________________;

with a Joint Status Report due to the Court by _____________________________________.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________ __________________________________

DATED WILLIAM ALSUP

United States District Judge

JOINT STATUS REPORT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE CMC

(09-CV-02664-WHA) 2

September 30, 2010, at noon October 7, 2010, at 11:00 a.m. July 9, 2010.

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:09-cv-02664-WHA Document 27 Filed 07/09/10 Page 2 of 2