alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 791.402 Determination of low-income housing needs. ( a ) Before budget authority is allocated, the Assistant Secretary for Policy Development and Research shall determine the relative need for low-income housing assistance in each HUD field office jurisdiction. This determination shall be based upon data from the most recent, available decennial census and, where appropriate, upon more recent data from the Bureau of the Census or other Federal agencies, or from the American Housing Survey.
( b ) Except for paragraph (c) of this section, the factors used to determine the relative need for assistance shall be based upon the following criteria: ( 1 ) *Population.* The renter population;
( 2 ) *Poverty.* The number of renter households with annual incomes at or below the poverty level, as defined by the Bureau of the Census;
( 3 ) *Housing overcrowding.* The number of renter-occupied housing units with an occupancy ratio of 1.01 or more persons per room;
( 4 ) *Housing vacancies.* The number of renter housing units that would be required to maintain vacancies at levels typical of balanced market conditions;
( 5 ) *Substandard housing.* The number of housing units built before 1940 and occupied by renter households with annual incomes at or below the poverty level, as defined by the Bureau of the Census; and
( 6 ) *Other objectively measurable conditions.* Data indicating potential need for rental housing assistance, such as the number of renter households with incomes below specified levels and paying a gross rent of more than 30 percent of household income.
( c ) For the section 202 elderly program, the data used shall reflect relevant characteristics of the elderly population. The data shall use the criteria specified in paragraph (b)(1) and (6) of this section, as modified to apply specifically to the needs of the elderly population.
( d ) Based on the criteria in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, the Assistant Secretary for Policy Development and Research shall establish housing needs factors for each county and independent city in the field office jurisdiction, and shall aggregate the factors for such jurisdiction. The field office total for each factor is then divided by the respective national total for that factor. The resulting housing needs ratios under paragraph (b) of this section are then weighted to provide housing needs percentages for each field office, using the following weights: population—20 percent; poverty—20 percent; housing overcrowding—10 percent; housing vacancies—10 percent; substandard housing—20 percent; other objectively measurable conditions—20 percent. For the section 202 elderly program, the two criteria described in paragraph (c) of this section are weighted equally.
( e ) The Assistant Secretary for Policy Development and Research shall adjust the housing needs percentages derived in paragraph (d) of this section to reflect the relative cost of providing housing among the field office jurisdictions.
[61 FR 10849, Mar. 15, 1996, as amended at 64 FR 26639, May 14, 1999]
#### § 886.310 Initial contract rents.

HUD will establish contract rents at levels that, together with other resources available to the purchasers, provide sufficient amounts for the necessary costs of rehabilitating and operating the multifamily housing project and do not exceed 120 percent of the most recently published Section 8 Fair Market Rents for Existing Housing (24 CFR part 888, subpart A).

[60 FR 11859, Mar. 2, 1995]
### §1213. Conflict with other laws

The provisions of this chapter shall govern if there is any conflict between this chapter and any other law.

(Pub. L. 97–468, title VI, §614, Jan. 14, 1983, 96 Stat. 2577.)
Exhibit 10.3





	



Demand Promissory Note,
dated April 7, 2022, in the principal amount of $50,000 from Bookmakers Company US, LLC payable to Victor Salerno


 


Please refer to the accompanying Exhibit 10.3. It is saved in PDF format.
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                       ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2004-J5
             MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-J5


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.

/s/ Joseph M. Candelario                       Dated: March 29, 2005
------------------------


JOSEPH M. CANDELARIO
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Mark Wong                                  Dated: March 29, 2005
-------------

MARK WONG
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-10401

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TOM PAUL JENKINS, 

also known as Tom P. Jenkins,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:96-CR-151

- - - - - - - - - -

December 10, 1997

Before BARKSDALE, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Tom Paul Jenkins entered a conditional guilty plea for

possession of an unregistered firearm, an explosive bomb, in

violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d). He now appeals the district

court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the superseding

indictment on grounds that § 5841 exceeds the taxation power of

Congress and that § 5861(d) is a violation of the Due Process

Clause. Jenkins concedes that his argument is foreclosed by this
No. 97-10401

-2-

court’s holding in United States v. Gresham, 118 F.3d 258, 261-64

(5th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court

is AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3237 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3237

  To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Methyl-4-chlorophenoxy-acetic 
                       acid, di-methylamine salt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 2005

  Mr. Buyer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Methyl-4-chlorophenoxy-acetic 
                       acid, di-methylamine salt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-METHYL-4-CHLOROPHENOXY-ACETIC ACID, DI-METHYLAMINE SALT.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.14.02       2-Methyl-4-        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         chlorophenoxy-                                                     31/2008
                         acetic acid, di-
                         methylamine salt
                         (CAS No. 2039-46-
                         5) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         2921.19.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
(June 25, 1962)

#### Carmine A. Battista et al., Respondents, v. James B. Bogan, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

In a negligence action to recover damages for injuries to person and property, arising out of a collision between a truck operated by plaintiff Battista and owned by the corporate plaintiff, and the automobile owned and operated by the defendant Bogan who lost control of the operation of his automobile by reason of an excavation in the highway made by defendant *971Consolidated Edison Company, the defendant Bogan appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered November 3,1961 after a jury trial, as is in the plaintiffs’ favor against him. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Kleinfeld, Christ and Rabin, JJ., concur; Ughetta, Acting P. J., and Hill, J., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment insofar as appealed from, and to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the evidence adduced was insufficient as a matter of law to establish that the defendant Bogan was negligent in the operation of his automobile (cf. *Ruback*v. *McCleary, Wallin & Crouse,*220 N. Y. 188, 195; *Digelormo*v. *Weil,*260 N. Y. 192, 200).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information primarily extracted from
AT&T Capital Corporation's unaudited consolidated income statement and balance
sheet as of and for the three months ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such unaudited consolidated financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       0
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                0
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             0<F2>
<PP&E>                                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                               0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         206,186
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        0<F2>
<BONDS>                                      0
<COMMON>                                 6,186
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                            200,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           206,186
<SALES>                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         4,670
<CGS>                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          4,670
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                             4,670
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0
        
<FN>
*  In accordance with Regulation S-K item 601(c) 2, inapplicable or
   immaterial financial data is reflected as zero value.

<F1> - Accumulated depreciation relates to equipment under operating
       leases.

<F2> - This item is not applicable since the Company does not prepare
       a classified balance sheet.
</FN>



</TABLE>
#### § 880.604 Tenant rent.

The eligible Family pays the Tenant Rent directly to the Owner.

[49 FR 19943, May 10, 1984]
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 234 (Friday, December 4, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 78324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26724]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY BOARD


Notice of Request for Comment on a Proposed Joint Exposure Draft, 
Implementation Guidance for Leases and Omnibus Amendments to Leases-
Related Topics

AGENCY: Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3511(d), the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 
as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), and the FASAB Rules Of Procedure, as 
amended in October 2010, notice is hereby given that the Federal 
Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) has issued a joint exposure 
draft of a proposed Federal Financial Accounting Technical Release (TR) 
titled Implementation Guidance for Leases and a proposed Statement of 
Federal Financial Accounting Standards (SFFAS) titled Omnibus 
Amendments to Leases-Related Topics.
    The exposure draft is available on the FASAB website at https://www.fasab.gov/documents-for-comment/. Copies can be obtained by 
contacting FASAB at (202) 512-7350.
    Respondents are encouraged to comment on any part of the joint 
exposure draft. Written comments are requested by February 5, 2021, and 
should be sent to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dcbabdafbdbe9cbabdafbdbef2bbb3aa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ef8ffedfffcdef8ffedfffcb0f9f1e8">[email protected]</span></a> or Monica R. Valentine, Executive 
Director, Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board, 441 G Street NW, 
Suite 1155, Washington, DC 20548.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Monica R. Valentine, Executive 
Director, 441 G Street NW, Suite 1155, Washington, DC 20548, or call 
(202) 512-7350.

    Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.), 31 
U.S.C. 3511(d).

    Dated: November 10, 2020.
Monica R. Valentine,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2020-26724 Filed 12-3-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LARRY CHARLES CLEVELAND,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v. CORINA NGO CHIN, M.D., sued in their Individual capacities; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 17

- 56448
D.C. No. 2:17

- cv - 01893

- DSF

- GJS

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 12 , 2018 **
Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges. California state prisoner Larry Charles Cleveland appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging retaliation
and deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs

. We have juris diction

un der 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A

.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

SEP 20 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

Wilhelm v. Rotman , 680 F.3d 1113, 1118 (2012)

. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand

. The distr ict court properly dismissed Cleveland’s deliberate indifference
claims against defendants Chin, Fina nder, Frances, Hughes, and Alvarez because
Cl eveland failed to allege facts sufficient to show that any defendant knew of and disregarded an excessive risk to his health. See Toguchi v. Chung , 391 F.3d 1051,
1057

- 58 (9th Cir. 2004) (a prison official acts with deliberate indifference only if he or she knows of and disregards an excessive risk to the prisoner’s health; mere negligence is insufficient to esta blish delib erate indifference). The district court properly dismissed Cleveland’s deliberate indifference claims against defendants Lois and Jones because Cleveland failed to allege that he was harmed by the delay in treatment. See Hallett v. Morgan , 296 F.3d 732, 746 (9th Cir. 2002) (prisoner alleging deliberate indifferen ce based on delay in treatment must show that delay led to further injury)

. The district court dismiss ed Cleveland’s deliberate indifference and
retaliation claim s against defendant Fitter for failure to state a claim. However, Cleveland alleged that defendant Fitter intentionally discontinued plaintiff’s pain
medication because Cleveland had complained about Fitter’s colleagues to the
medical board

. Liberally construed, these allegations “are sufficient to warrant
orderin g [Fitter] to file an answer. ” Wilhelm , 680 F.3d at 1116; see also Rhodes v.3

Robinson , 408 F.3d 559, 567

- 68 (9th Cir. 2005) (setting forth elements of a First Amendment retaliation claim in the prison context); Hunt v. Dental Dep’t , 865 F.2d 198, 201 (9th Cir. 1989) (concluding that defendant acted with deliberate indifference where his purposeful act caused the prisoner to suffer unnecessary a nd wanton infliction of pain). We reverse and remand for further proceedings on these claims against Fitter only.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED
.
#### COMMERCIAL WOOD & CEMENT CO., Appellant, v. NORTHAMPTON PORTLAND CEMENT CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 20, 1903.)

Action by the Commercial Wood & Cement Company against the Northampton Portland Cement Company.

A. J. Rose, for appellant. W. H. Stayton, for respondent.

No opinion. Order (84 N. Y. Supp. 38), affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
#### The People of the State of New York v. George Hill.

Assignment of Anthony F. Marra, Esq., as counsel for defendant-appellant contained in the order of this court entered on May 10, 1962, vacated, and Otto Fusco, Esq., of 180 East 161st St., Bronx, New York, is assigned as counsel for defendant-appellant in the place of Anthony F. Marra, Esq. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SendTec, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for
the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald Gould, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Donald Gould, Jr.        
|Donald Gould, Jr.            
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Financial Officer)
|                             
|August 20, 2008
Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION




By
signing below, each of the undersigned officers hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to his knowledge, (i) this report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MISCOR
Group, Ltd.




Date:
April 15,
2009.







/s/
      John
      A. MartellJohn
      A. MartellChief
      Executive Officer/s/
      Mary M. HuntMary
      M. HuntChief
      Accounting Officer
Exhibit 15.1

[Letterhead of Maples and Calder]

Our ref AAL/604835/456472/v1

Your ref

The9 Limited

Building No.3, 690 Bibo Road

Zhang Jiang Hi-Tech Park

Pudong New Area, Pudong

Shanghai 201203, Peoples Republic of China

28 June 2007

Dear Sirs,

Re: The9 Limited (the Company)

We consent to the
reference to our firm under the heading Taxation in the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in the month of June 2007.



|                     
|---------------------
|Yours faithfully,    
|                     
|/s/ Maples and Calder
|Maples and Calder