alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(April 5, 1962)

#### Washington Heights Federal Savings and Loan Association, Plaintiff, v. Lark Enterprises, Inc., et al., Defendants; Ralph Grimaldi et al., Appellants, and Thomas B. Martin et al., Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund and Welfare Fund, Respondent.

Motion by claimant-respondent, Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, etc., to dismiss the appeal by reason of the elaimants-appellants’ failure to file a proper appeal record, and for other relief, denied. On the court’s own motion the appeal is ordered on the calendar for the May Term, beginning April 23, 1962. The appellants are directed to serve and file on or before April 16, 1962, a supplemental record which shall include *all*of the testimony adduced before the Referee *which has been omitted*from the appeal record presently on file. The stay heretofore granted is continued on condition that appellants shall file and serve such supplemental record within the time prescribed, and on the further condition that appellants be ready to argue or submit the appeal at the May Term. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
§ 990.180 Utilities expense level: Computation of the rolling base consumption level. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) The rolling base consumption level (RBCL) shall be equal to the average of yearly consumption levels for the 36-month period ending on the June 30th that is 18 months prior to the first day of the applicable funding period.
( 2 ) The yearly consumption level is the actual amount of each utility consumed during a 12-month period ending June 30th. For example, for the funding period January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2006, the RBCL will be the average of the following yearly consumption levels: ( i ) Year 1 = July 1, 2001, through June 30, 2002.
( ii ) Year 2 = July 1, 2002, through June 30, 2003.
( iii ) Year 3 = July 1, 2003, through June 30, 2004. Note to paragraph ( a
)(2):
In this example, the current year's consumption level will be July 1, 2004, through June 30, 2005.
( b ) *Distortions to rolling base consumption level.* The PHA shall have its RBCL determined so as not to distort the rolling base period in accordance with a method prescribed by HUD if: ( 1 ) A project has not been in operation during at least 12 months of the rolling base period;
( 2 ) A project enters or exits management after the rolling base period and prior to the end of the applicable funding period; or
( 3 ) A project has experienced a conversion from one energy source to another, switched from PHA-supplied to resident-purchased utilities during or after the rolling base period, or for any other reason that would cause the RBCL not to be comparable to the current year's consumption level.
( c ) *Financial incentives.* The three-year rolling base for all relevant utilities will be adjusted to reflect any financial incentives to the PHA to reduce consumption as described in § 990.185.
AUTHORIZATION

        Know all by these presents, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and
appoints each of John M. Lowber, Bonnie J. Paskvan, and Alfred J. Walker,
signing singly, the undersigned's true and lawful attorney-in-fact to:

(1) execute for and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned's capacity
as an affiliate of General Communication, Inc. (the "Company"), Form 4, in
accordance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
rules thereunder;

(2) do and perform any and all acts for and on behalf of the undersigned which
may be necessary or desirable to complete and execute any such Form 4, complete
and execute any amendment or amendments thereto, and timely file such form with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any stock exchange or
similar authority; and

(3) take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the
foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit to,
in the best interest of, or legally required by, the undersigned, it being
understood that the documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on behalf of the
undersigned pursuant to this Power of Attorney shall be in such form and shall
contain such terms and conditions as such attorney-in-fact may approve in such
attorney-in-fact's discretion.

        The undersigned hereby grants to each such attorney-in-fact full power
and authority to do and perform any and every act and thing whatsoever
requisite, necessary, or proper to be done in the exercise of any of the rights
and powers herein granted, as fully to all intents and purposes as the
undersigned might or could do if personally present, with full power of
substitution or revocation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such
attorney-in-fact, or such attorney-in-fact's substitute or substitutes, shall
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this power of attorney and the
rights and powers herein granted. The undersigned acknowledges that the
foregoing attorneys-in-fact, in serving in such capacity at the request of the
undersigned, are not assuming, nor is the Company assuming, any of the
undersigned's responsibilities to comply with Section 16 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.

        This Power of Attorney shall remain in full force and effect until the
undersigned is no longer required to file Form 4, with respect to the
undersigned's holdings of and transactions in securities issued by the Company,
unless earlier revoked by the undersigned in a signed writing delivered to the
foregoing attorneys-in-fact.


                                   1
<PAGE>
        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Power of Attorney to
be executed as of this 4th day of October 2004.


                                 /s/
                                 ------------------------
                                 Signature


                                 William Parker Glasgow
                                 ------------------------
                                 Print Name
### §451i. "Federal irrigation project" defined

As used in this subchapter, the term "Federal irrigation project" means any irrigation project subject to the Federal reclamation laws (Act of June 17, 1902, 32 Stat. 388, and Acts amendatory thereof or supplementary thereto), to which laws this subchapter itself shall be deemed a supplement.

(Aug. 13, 1953, ch. 428, §11, 67 Stat. 568.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of June 17, 1902, referred to in text, is popularly known as the Reclamation Act, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 371 of this title and Tables.
§ 882.414 Security and utility deposits. ( a ) If at the time of the initial execution of the Lease the Owner wishes to collect a security deposit, the maximum amount shall be the greater of one month's Total Tenant Payment or $50. However, this amount shall not exceed the maximum amount allowable under State or local law. For units leased in place, security deposits collected prior to the execution of a Contract which are in excess of this maximum amount do not have to be refunded until the Family vacates the unit subject to the lease terms. The Family is expected to pay security deposits and utility deposits from its resources and/or other public or private sources.
( b ) If a Family vacates the unit, the Owner, subject to State and local law, may use the security deposit as reimbursement for any unpaid Tenant Rent or other amount which the Family owes under the Lease. If a Family vacates the unit owing no rent or other amount under the Lease consistent with State or local law or if such amount is less than the amount of the security deposit, the Owner shall refund the full amount or the unused balance to the Family.
( c ) In those jurisdictions where interest is payable by the Owner on security deposits, the refunded amount shall include the amount of interest payable. The Owner shall comply with all State and local laws regarding interest payments on security deposits.
( d ) If the security deposit is insufficient to reimburse the Owner for the unpaid Tenant Rent or other amounts which the Family owes under the Lease, or if the Owner did not collect a security deposit, the Owner may claim reimbursement from the PHA for an amount not to exceed the lesser of: ( 1 ) The amount owed the Owner, or
( 2 ) Two month's Contract Rent; minus, in either case, the greater of the security deposit actually collected or the amount of security deposit the Owner could have collected under the program (pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section). Any reimbursement under this section must be applied first toward any unpaid Tenant Rent due under the Lease and then to any other amounts owed. No reimbursement may be claimed for unpaid rent for the period after the Family vacates.
[43 FR 61246, Dec. 29, 1978, as amended at 44 FR 31176, May 31, 1979; 49 FR 19945, May 10, 1984. Redesignated at 63 FR 23854, Apr. 30, 1998]
### SUBCHAPTER II—COMMON CARRIERS
### §10706. Seamen dying in the United States

When a seaman dies in the United States and is entitled at death to claim money, property, or wages from the master or owner of a vessel on which the seaman served, the master or owner shall deliver the money, property, and wages to a district court of the United States within one week of the seaman's death. If the seaman's death occurs at sea, such money, property, or wages shall be delivered to a district court or a consular officer within one week of the vessel's arrival at the first port call after the seaman's death.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 573; Pub. L. 103–206, title IV, §419, Dec. 20, 1993, 107 Stat. 2438.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 10706 | 46:625 |

Section 10706 provides for the disposal by the master of the property and wages of deceased seamen who have died in the United States.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1993—Pub. L. 103–206 substituted "to a district court of the United States within one week of the seaman's death. If the seaman's death occurs at sea, such money, property, or wages shall be delivered to a district court or a consular officer within one week of the vessel's arrival at the first port call after the seaman's death." for "as provided by regulations prescribed by the Secretary.".
Case 3:09-cv-02771-MMC Document 51 Filed 08/11/10 Page 1 of 2
all parties shall

August 11, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-02771-MMC Document 51 Filed 08/11/10 Page 2 of 2
* After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### April 29, 2010 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

MARCUS D. SEWARD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee. No. 09-5140 (D.C. No. 4:08-CV-00464-TCK-PJC) (N.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before TACHA , BALDOCK , and BRISCOE , Circuit Judges.

Marcus D. Seward appeals from a judgment of the district court affirming the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s denial of his application for disability benefits and supplemental security income benefits. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), we affirm.-2- Mr. Seward claimed disability beginning in June 2004, due to back and neck injuries, depression, and a childhood polio deformity. The Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) denied benefits after finding that Mr. Seward: (1) had the severe impairment of degenerative disc disease; (2) his impairment did not meet or equal a listing; (3) he was not entirely credible; and (4) he retained the residual functional capacity (“RFC”) to perform sedentary work. On appeal, Mr. Seward raises the same issues he raised in the district court: (1) the ALJ did not properly evaluate his credibility; (2) the ALJ did not apply the correct legal standards in assessing his RFC; and (3) the ALJ’s RFC determination is not supported by substantial evidence. We review de novo the district court’s decision to reverse the [Commissioner], applying the same standards as those employed by the district court. Judicial review of the [Commissioner’s] decision is limited to a determination whether [his] factual findings are supported by substantial evidence and whether [he] applied the correct legal standards. Nguyen v. Shalala , 43 F.3d 1400, 1402 (10th Cir. 1994) (citation omitted). We have reviewed, de novo, the district court’s decision, which adopts the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge to affirm the Commissioner’s denial of benefits. The report and recommendation is thorough, well-reasoned and persuasive on each point argued by Mr. Seward again in this court. We see no reason to repeat the analysis, and we affirm for substantially the same reasons set-3- for in the report and recommendation dated August 6, 2009, and adopted by the district court in its September 8, 2009 order. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court

Deanell Reece Tacha Circuit Judge
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEREMY JOHN BEASLEY,

Petitioner,

 v.

FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, Warden,

Respondent. /

No. CV-09-2830 MMC (PR)

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

() Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues

have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

(X) Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The

issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration

is hereby DENIED. The instant action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice.

Dated: April 14, 2010 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: Tracy Lucero

Deputy Clerk

Case 3:09-cv-02830-MMC Document 7 Filed 04/14/10 Page 1 of 1
### §5110. Submersible vessels

Notwithstanding sections 5103–5105 of this title, the Secretary may prescribe regulations for submersible vessels to provide a minimum level of safety. In developing the regulations, the Secretary shall consider factors relevant to submersible vessels, including the structure, stability, and watertight integrity of those vessels.

(Pub. L. 99–509, title V, §5101(2), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1917.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### Revised section 5110

Section 5110 authorizes the Secretary to prescribe regulations for the marking of load lines of submersible vessels. This general authority has been included in anticipation of the commercial development of submersibles.
#### Publication Types

Executive Briefings on Trade
The ***Executive Briefings on Trade*** (EBOTs) are focused 2-page papers that keep the Commission and the public current on domestic and global activities that affect U.S. trade, investment, and competitiveness.

----

Journal of International Commerce and Economics (JICE)
The ***Journal of International Commerce and Economics*** (JICE) is a peer-reviewed journal (ISSN 2152-6877) published on a periodic basis by the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC). JICE articles contribute to the field of applied international trade by providing in-depth, policy-relevant, and accessible analysis of contemporary economic, industry competitiveness, and investment issues.

----

Staff Research / Working Papers
***Staff Research / Working Papers*** represent preliminary, technical trade research conducted by staff in the offices of Economics and Industries. Their aim is to make valuable contributions to the literature on applied topics in international trade.

#### Pagination

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Page            3 
-                Page            4 
-                Page            5 
-                Page            6 
-                Page            7 
-                Page            8 
-                Page            9 
-  … 
-  Next page›› 
-  Last pageLast »
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Wise Metals Group LLC (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, David DAddario, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 21, 2007



By:

/s/ David DAddarioDavid DAddarioChairman and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code)




Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Orsus Xelent Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the “Company”), does
hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Form 10-K”) of the Company
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





Date: April
      15, 2010/s/  Guoji LiuGuoji
      LiuChief
      Executive OfficerDate:
      April 15, 2010/s/   Hua
    ChenHua
      ChenChief
      Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 3.405 Housing. ( a ) *Generally.* A recipient shall not, on the basis of sex, apply different rules or regulations, impose different fees or requirements, or offer different services or benefits related to housing, except as provided in this section (including housing provided only to married students).
( b ) *Housing provided by recipient.* ( 1 ) A recipient may provide separate housing on the basis of sex.
( 2 ) Housing provided by a recipient to students of one sex, when compared to that provided to students of the other sex, shall be as a whole: ( i ) Proportionate in quantity to the number of students of that sex applying for such housing; and
( ii ) Comparable in quality and cost to the student.
( c ) *Other housing.* ( 1 ) A recipient shall not, on the basis of sex, administer different policies or practices concerning occupancy by its students of housing other than that provided by such recipient.
( 2 ) ( i ) A recipient which, through solicitation, listing, approval of housing, or otherwise, assists any agency, organization, or person in making housing available to any of its students, shall take such reasonable action as may be necessary to assure itself that such housing as is provided to students of one sex, when compared to that provided to students of the other sex, is as a whole: ( A ) Proportionate in quantity; and
( B ) Comparable in quality and cost to the student.
( ii ) A recipient may render such assistance to any agency, organization, or person that provides all or part of such housing to students of only one sex.
#### § 236.15 Notice.

Any communication to USAID pursuant to the Guarantee shall be in writing in the English language, shall refer to the Republic of Tunisia Loan Guarantee Number inscribed on the Eligible Note and shall be complete on the day it shall be actually received by USAID at the Office of Development Credit, Bureau for Economic Growth, Education and Environment, United States Agency for International Development, Washington, DC 20523-0030. Other addresses may be substituted for the above upon the giving of notice of such substitution to each Noteholder by first class mail at the address set forth in the Note Register.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ANTHONY BENEDETTO,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1879

[August 31, 2017]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, 

Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 91-2758CF10B and 96-18372CF10A.

Anthony K. Benedetto, Lake Butler, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT
23.1




INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S CONSENT





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
GlobalOptions Group, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-153097), Form S-8 (File No.
333-139368), Form S-8 (File No. 333-136458), Form S-3 (File No. 333-149020) and
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form SB-2 on Form S-3 (File No. 333-145053) of
our report dated February 15, 2011, with respect to our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of GlobalOptions Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009
and 2008, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
GlobalOptions Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010.





/s/
Marcum LLP


Marcum
LLP





New York,
New York





February
15, 2011
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3386 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain footwear with open toes or 

heels. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 21, 2005 

Mr. RYUN of Kansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain footwear with 

open toes or heels. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN FOOTWEAR WITH OPEN TOES OR 

4 HEELS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 
2 

•HR 3386 IH 

‘‘ 9902.64.08 Footwear with outer soles of 

rubber or plastics and uppers of vegetable fibers, with 

open toes or open heels, 

other than house slippers 

(provided for in subheading 

6404.19.25) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ