alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
31.2





CERTIFICATIONS
UNDER SECTION 302





I, Donna
Brandin, certify that:




1.  I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Lightstone Value Plus Real
Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (the “Company”);




2.  Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;




4.  The
Company’s other certifying officer and I have:




a)  designed
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)), or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;




b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




c)
disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal
quarter (the Company's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company's internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  The
Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s
auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):




a)  all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and




b)  any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.





March 31,
2010




/s/ Donna
Brandin


Donna
Brandin


Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer


(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank

Notice of an Open Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

# TIME AND DATE:

Thursday, December 17, 2020 at 9:30 a.m.

# PLACE:

The meeting will be held via teleconference.

# STATUS:

The meeting will be open to public observation by teleconference only.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Proposal to Consider Changes to Content Policy with Respect to the Program on China and Transformational Exports. 

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                        Joyce B. Stone (202-257-4086). Members of the public who wish to attend the meeting via audio only teleconference should register via                         *https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/​register/​3683174148646534924*                         by noon Wednesday, December 16, 2020. Individuals will be directed to a Webinar registration page and provided call-in information.                    

Joyce B. Stone,

Assistant Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2020-26927 Filed 12-3-20; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
§ 3286.311 Suspension or revocation of trainer's qualification. ( a ) *Oversight.* The Secretary may make a continuing evaluation of the manner in which each qualified trainer is carrying out the trainer's responsibilities under this subpart D.
( b ) *Suspension or revocation of qualification.* After notice and an opportunity for a presentation of views in accordance with subpart D of part 3282 of this chapter, the Secretary may suspend or revoke a trainer's qualification under this part. A trainer's qualification may be suspended or revoked for cause, which may include: ( 1 ) Providing false records or information to HUD;
( 2 ) Refusing to submit information required to be submitted by the Secretary in accordance with the Act;
( 3 ) Certifying, or improperly assisting certification of, a person as having met the training requirements established in this part when that person has not completed the required training;
( 4 ) Failing to appropriately supervise installation training that is used to meet the requirements of this part and that is provided by other persons; and
( 5 ) Any other failures to comply with the requirements of this part.
( c ) *Other criteria.* In deciding whether to suspend or revoke a trainer's qualification, the Secretary will consider the impact of the suspension or revocation on other affected parties and will seek to assure that the sales and siting of manufactured homes are not unduly disrupted.
( d ) *Reinstating qualification.* A trainer whose qualification has been suspended or revoked may submit a new application to be qualified in accordance with this subpart D no sooner than 6 months after the date of suspension or revocation. A trainer whose qualification has been suspended may also reinstate the qualification in any manner provided under the terms of the suspension.
### §797f. Contracting out

All work in connection with the operation or services provided by the Corporation on the rail lines, properties, equipment, or facilities acquired pursuant to the provisions of this chapter and the maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, or modernization of such lines, properties, equipment, or facilities which has been performed by practice or agreement in accordance with provisions of the existing contracts in effect with the representatives of the employees of the classes or crafts involved shall continue to be performed by the Corporation's employees, including employees on furlough. Should the Corporation lack a sufficient number of employees, including employees on furlough, and be unable to hire additional employees, to perform the work required, it shall be permitted to subcontract that part of such work which cannot be performed by its employees, including those on furlough, except where agreement by the representatives of the employees of the classes or crafts involved is required by applicable collective-bargaining agreements. The term "unable to hire additional employees" as used in this section contemplates establishment and maintenance by the Corporation of an apprenticeship, training, or recruitment program to provide an adequate number of skilled employees to perform the work.

(Pub. L. 93–236, title VII, §707, as added Pub. L. 97–35, title XI, §1143(a), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 665.)
#### § 891.620 Overcrowded and underoccupied units.

If the Borrower determines that because of change in family size, an assisted unit is smaller than appropriate for the eligible family to which it is leased, or that the assisted unit is larger than appropriate, housing assistance payments or project assistance payments (as applicable) with respect to the unit will not be reduced or terminated until the eligible family has been relocated to an appropriate alternate unit. If possible, the Borrower will, as promptly as possible, offer the family an appropriate alternate unit. The Borrower may receive vacancy payments for the vacated unit if the Borrower complies with the requirements of § 891.650.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 21

- 00196

- CV

In re John Bird, Individually, and as de facto trustee of the Carl C. Anderson, Sr. and

Marie Jo Anderson Charitable remainder trust and as former de facto trustee of the Carl

C. An derson, Sr. and Marie Jo Anderson Family Trust F/B/O Jennifer Jo Bird

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

_______________________ ___________________

Thomas J. Baker , Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Baker and Smith

Filed: September 10 , 2021
121 STAT. 1022 PUBLIC LAW 110–106—OCT. 25, 2007 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 995: 

SENATE REPORTS: No. 110–165 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007): 

Mar. 5, considered and passed House. 

Oct. 24, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–106 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To amend Public Law 106–348 to extend the authorization for establishing a memorial in the District of Columbia or its environs to honor veterans who became 

disabled while serving in the Armed Forces of the United States. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR ESTABLISHING DISABLED 

VETERANS MEMORIAL. 

Public Law 106–348 is amended— 

(1) in subsection (b)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘The establishment’’ and inserting 

‘‘Except as provided in subsection (e), the establishment’’; 

and 

(B) by striking ‘‘the Commemorative Works Act (40 

U.S.C. 1001 et seq.)’’ and inserting ‘‘chapter 89 of title 

40, United States Code’’; 

(2) in subsection (d)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘section 8(b) of the Commemorative 

Works Act (40 U.S.C. 1008(b))’’ and inserting ‘‘section 8906 

of title 40, United States Code’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘or upon expiration of the authority 

for the memorial under section 10(b) of such Act (40 U.S.C. 

1010(b)),’’; and 

(C) by striking ‘‘section 8(b)(1) of such Act (40 U.S.C. 

1008(b)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘8906(b)(2) or (3) of such title’’; 

and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY.—Notwithstanding section 

8903(e) of title 40, United States Code, the authority to establish 

a memorial under this section shall expire on October 24, 2015.’’. 

Approved October 25, 2007. 

40 USC 8903 

note. 

Oct. 25, 2007 

[H.R. 995]
```

[House Report 105-70]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

105th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

 1st Session                                                     105-70
_______________________________________________________________________

 
      PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 1271, FAA RESEARCH, 
         ENGINEERING, AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORIZATION ACT OF 1997

                                _______
                                

   April 23, 1997.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 125]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 125, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

               brief summary of provisions of resolution

    The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 1271, 
the ``FAA Research, Engineering, and Development 
Authorization'' under an open rule. The rule provides one hour 
of general debate divided equally between the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Science.
    The rule waives section 306 (prohibiting consideration of 
legislation within the Budget Committee's jurisdiction unless 
the Budget Committee reported it) of the Congressional Budget 
Act of 1974 against consideration of the bill.
    The rule makes in order the Committee on Science amendment 
in the nature of a substitute as an original bill for the 
purpose of amendment, with each section being considered as 
read. The rule also waives section 306 of the Congressional 
Budget Act of 1974 against the committee amendment in the 
nature of a substitute.
    Members who have preprinted their amendments in the Record 
prior to their consideration will be given priority in 
recognition to offer their amendments if otherwise consistent 
with House rules. Finally, the rule provides for one motion to 
recommit, with or without instructions.
```
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Shengtai Pharmaceutical, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Qingtai Liu , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.     
The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and





2.     
That the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
September 28, 2009





SHENGTAI
      PHARMACEUTICAL, INC./s/
      Qingtai LiuQingtai
      LiuChief
      Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Oilwell Varco, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Merrill A. Miller, Jr., Chairman, President andChief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.The certification is given to the knowledge of the undersigned.         By:  */s/ Merrill A. Miller, Jr.*   Name: Merrill A. Miller, Jr.  Title: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer  Date: November 5, 2007 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto National Oilwell Varco, Inc. and will be retained by National Oilwell Varco, Inc., and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
27
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          43,173
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,836
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,062
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,782
<PP&E>                                           9,306
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 126,202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,343
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           224
<OTHER-SE>                                     100,385
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   126,202
<SALES>                                         27,468
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,328
<CGS>                                           12,863
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,579
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,788
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,545
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,993
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,552
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,552
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24
        

</TABLE>
(No. 88-CC-0634

#### Bobby Cox, Sr., and Judy Cox, Claimants, *v.*The State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 20, 1993.*

Hasselberg & Rock, for Claimants.

Roland W. Burris, Attorney General (Mary Elise Walden, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

OPINION

Patchett, J.

This case arises as a result of an auto accident which occurred on November 22, 1985, in Danville, Illinois. There is a four-lane bridge on State Route 150 in the city of Danville known as the Ellsworth Park Bridge. The Illinois Department of Transportation has responsibility for maintenance of this bridge, and the bridge is located approximately five or six blocks from the Department of Transportation storage area. The bridge is a very heavily used bridge in the Danville area.

The Danville transportation area is divided into three sections, the north, the central, and the south. The Ellsworth Park Bridge lies within the central section. A truck is assigned to each section.

On November 21 and 22, 1985, the weather forecast contained a 70% chance of sleet and/or freezing rain. A *202truck patrol was sent out on the evening of November 21, 1985, to watch for evidence of sleet or frost, and to treat the road after sleet or frost was discovered. The Department of Transportation policy was to treat bridges first because bridges would freeze before roadways. In addition, employees are to treat the most heavily traveled areas first.

At approximately 6:00 a.m., on November 22, 1985, frost started to develop on the bridges and several accidents were reported to the Illinois Department of Transportation.

A Department of Transportation employee who drove the truck assigned to the central section testified that he had treated the bridge at 5:10 a.m., although that was probably before moisture began to form. At approximately 6:45 a.m. on November 22, 1985, the accident in question occurred. The accident was serious, and there is no doubt that serious damages were incurred as a result of the accident.

The real question before this Court is whether a tort has been committed for which the State is responsible. The State undoubtedly has a responsibility to treat its bridges for moisture in a reasonable manner, and/or to warn of the condition of the bridges if they are not treated. However, the State is not an insurer of the condition of its highways. In this case, only 45 minutes elapsed from the time the first evidence of moisture accumulation occurred until the accident. There was simply not enough time, given the present set of facts, for which the State can be held liable for failure to treat or failure to warn. We therefore hold that the State did not fail to do an act which it had a reasonable opportunity to perform, and therefore is not liable for the unfortunate accident which *203occurred in this case. *Illinois Ruan Transport Corp. v. State*(1973), 28 Ill. Ct. Cl. 323; *Schuett v. State*(1984), 36 Ill. Ct. Cl. 62; *Calvert & Williams v. State*(1985), 38 Ill. Ct. Cl. 104; *Pryor v. State*(1983), 35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 741.

For the foregoing reasons, we hereby deny this claim.
Order entered January 4, 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 11

- 01712

- CR

SHELDON ROBERTS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F04

- 73256

- T



### O RDER

Appellant’s December 31, 2012 second motion to extend the time to file appellant’s brief

is GRANTED . Appellant’s brief received by the Clerk of the Court on December 31, 2012 is

DEEMED timely filed on the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE