alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1.   | The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 3, 2010, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition at the end of the period covered by the Quarterly Report and results of operations of the Company for the periods covered by the Quarterly Report. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November 12, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Joseph Y. Liu  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   | Joseph Y. Liu           |   |
|                    |   | Chief Executive Officer |   |
Exhibit 10.62



DREAMWORKS ANIMATION SKG, INC.

1000 FLOWER STREET

GLENDALE, CA 91201



February 21, 2008



Mr. Jeffrey Katzenberg

c/o Mickey Rutman

Breslauer & Rutman

11400 W. Olympic Boulevard, Suite 550

Los Angeles, CA 90064



Dear Jeffrey:



Reference is made to that certain executed Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2007 (the Agreement),
between DreamWorks Animation SKG, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Studio), and you, whereby Studio agreed to employ you and you agreed to accept such employment upon the terms and conditions set forth therein. Except as provided to the
contrary herein, all capitalized terms in this letter shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Agreement.



For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, you hereby waive your right to receive the following:



| | (i) | the equity-based or cash compensation under Paragraph 4(b)(ii) of the Agreement that would be granted to you, subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee, during the
remaining term of the Agreement; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (ii) | the equity-based compensation under Paragraph 4(b)(iii) of the Agreement that would be granted to you, subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee, during the remaining
term of the Agreement.
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Except as expressly
modified by this letter, this letter does not modify or amend the Agreement in any respect. As modified by this letter, the Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects.







---

Mr. Jeffrey Katzenberg

February 21, 2008



If the foregoing correctly sets forth your understanding, please sign one copy of this letter and return it to the undersigned, whereupon this letter
shall constitute a binding agreement between us



Very truly yours,  DREAMWORKS ANIMATION SKG, INC.By:

/s/ Lewis W. ColemanIts:

President and Chief Financial Officer




ACCEPTED AND AGREED AS OF THE

DATE FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN:



|                      
|----------------------
|                      
|/s/ Jeffrey Katzenberg
|JEFFREY KATZENBERG    





-2-
#### § 401.401 Consolidated Restructuring Plans.

A PAE may request HUD to approve a Consolidated Restructuring Plan that presents an overall strategy for more than one project included in the PRA. HUD will consider approval of a Consolidated Restructuring Plan for projects having common ownership, geographic proximity, common mortgagee or servicer, or other factors that contribute to more efficient use of the PAE's resources. Notwithstanding the more efficient use of a PAE's resources, HUD will not approve any Consolidated Restructuring Plans that have a detrimental effect on tenants or the community, or a higher cost to the Federal Government. HUD's decision to approve or disapprove a Consolidated Restructuring Plan will be made on a case-by-case basis.

[65 FR 15485, Mar. 22, 2000, as amended at 72 FR 66038, Nov. 26, 2007]
Document

Exhibit 10.28

AMENDMENT TO 
AMENDED AND RESTATED TRANSDIGM GROUP INCORPORATED
2014 STOCK OPTION PLAN DIVIDEND EQUIVALENT PLAN


WHEREAS, TransDigm Group Incorporated (the “Company”) currently maintains and sponsors the Amended and Restated TransDigm Group Incorporated 2014 Stock Option Plan Dividend Equivalent Plan (the “Plan”); and
WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company wishes to amend the Plan in accordance with the provisions of Section 5(a) of the Plan..
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:
Section 4(a)(ii) of the plan is amended to change the words “record date” in two places in the first sentence to “ex-dividend date”.
This Amendment shall be effective as of October 26, 2022.
Except as modified by this Amendment, all of the terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain valid and in full force and effect.
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment was duly adopted by the Compensation Committee on October 26, 2022.
 
									
			
	TRANSDIGM GROUP INCORPORATED
		
	By	 	/s/ Halle Martin
		 	Halle Martin, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary
### §7704a. Sexual harassment or sexual assault as grounds for suspension or revocation

(a) Sexual Harassment.—If it is shown at a hearing under this chapter that a holder of a license, certificate of registry, or merchant mariner's document issued under this part, within 5 years before the beginning of the suspension and revocation proceedings, is the subject of an official finding of sexual harassment, then the license, certificate of registry, or merchant mariner's document may be suspended or revoked.

(b) Sexual Assault.—If it is shown at a hearing under this chapter that a holder of a license, certificate of registry, or merchant mariner's document issued under this part, within 10 years before the beginning of the suspension and revocation proceedings, is the subject of an official finding of sexual assault, then the license, certificate of registry, or merchant mariner's document shall be revoked.

(c) Official Finding.—

(1) In general.—In this section, the term "official finding" means—

(A) a legal proceeding or agency finding or decision that determines the individual committed sexual harassment or sexual assault in violation of any Federal, State, local, or Tribal law or regulation; or

(B) a determination after an investigation by the Coast Guard that, by a preponderance of the evidence, the individual committed sexual harassment or sexual assault if the investigation affords appropriate due process rights to the subject of the investigation.

(2) Administrative law judge review.—

(A) Coast guard investigation.—A determination under paragraph (1)(B) shall be reviewed and affirmed by an administrative law judge within the same proceeding as any suspension or revocation of a license, certificate of registry, or merchant mariner's document under subsection (a) or (b).

(B) Legal proceeding.—A determination under paragraph (1)(A) that an individual committed sexual harassment or sexual assault is conclusive in suspension and revocation proceedings.

(Added Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXVI, §11603(a), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 4147.)
### §57515. Awarding of charters

(a) In General.—The Secretary of Transportation shall award the charter to the bidder proposing to pay the highest monthly charter hire. However, the Secretary may reject the highest or most advantageous or any other bid if the Secretary considers the charter hire offered too low or determines that the bidder lacks the qualifications required by section 57514 of this title.

(b) Highest Bid Rejected.—If the Secretary rejects the highest bid, the Secretary may—

(1) award the charter to the next highest bidder; or

(2) reject all bids and either readvertise the line or operate the line until conditions appear more favorable to reoffer the line for private charter.

(c) Reason for Rejection.—On request of a bidder, the reason for rejection shall be stated in writing to the bidder.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1667.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 57515 | 46 App.:1196(b) (1st sentence related to authority). | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title VII, §§706(b) (1st sentence related to authority), 707, 49 Stat. 2009; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(108), (109), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 163. |
| | 46 App.:1197. | |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "if the Secretary considers the charter hire offered too low" are substituted for "if, in the Secretary's discretion, the charter hire offered is deemed too low" to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "lacks the qualifications required by section 57514 of this title" are substituted for "lacks sufficient capital, credit, or experience to operate successfully the line" to avoid repeating the qualifications in more than one place.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 13.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of 51job, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such
officer's knowledge, that:

      The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the
"Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

      Date: April 27, 2005

                                   By:    /s/ Rick Yan
                                          -------------------------------------
                                   Name:  Rick Yan
                                   Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to 51job, Inc. and will be retained by 51job, Inc. and furnished
to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

      This certification will not be deemed "filed" for the purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability
of that section. This certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 even if the document with which it is submitted to the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission is so incorporated by reference.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JASON E. BAIN, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-4991

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed September 4, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Polk County; Donald G. Jacobsen, 

Judge.

Jason E. Bain, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Larzelere, 979 So. 2d 195 (Fla. 2008); State v. 

Roby, 246 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 1971); McDonald v. State, 133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA 

2013); Doby v. State, 25 So. 3d 598 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 

132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Valdez-Garcia v. State, 965 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); 

Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Brown v. State, 827 So. 2d 

1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Woodberry v. State, 193 So. 3d 5 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016); Lopez 

v. State, 833 So. 2d 283 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Roberts v. State, 813 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. 

1st DCA 2002); Harris v. State, 789 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
#### § 891.690 Other Federal requirements.

In addition to the Federal requirements set forth in 24 CFR part 5, other Federal requirements for the 202/162 projects are provided in §§ 891.155 and 891.325.
| ·   | Consulting                fee will be paid at a daily rate in the amount of $2000 for each                day                worked at the request of the                company. |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | An                invoice for consulting fees incurred during a calendar month (including                a                disclosure of the days worked during such month) will be provided                to John                Horton no later than the 5th                day of the following month. Payment will be made within 10 days of                the                receipt of such invoice. |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | Services                provided shall include financial staff evaluation, assessing and                interviewing candidates for the position of Chief Financial Officer,                monthly review of financial statements, and implementation assistance                for                the new enterprise resources management                system. |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | This                arrangement can be terminated by either party with 3 business days                notice. |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3311 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3311

    To suspend temporarily the duty on electrically operated pencil 
                              sharpeners.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 14, 2005

   Mr. Ross introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on electrically operated pencil 
                              sharpeners.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELECTRICALLY OPERATED PENCIL SHARPENERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.05.70      Electrically        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         operated pencil                                                    31/2008
                         sharpeners
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         8472.90.40.......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### §900. Suits to cancel patents to lands erroneously issued under railroad or wagon-road grants

Suits by the United States to vacate and annul any patent to lands erroneously issued under a railroad or wagon-road grant shall only be brought within six years after the date of the issuance of such patents. But no patent to any lands held by a bona fide purchaser shall be vacated or annulled, but the right and title of such purchaser is hereby confirmed: Provided, That no suit shall be brought or maintained, nor shall recovery be had for lands or the value thereof, that were certified or patented in lieu of other lands covered by a grant which were lost or relinquished by the grantee in consequence of the failure of the Government or its officers to withdraw the same from sale or entry.

(Mar. 2, 1896, ch. 39, §1, 29 Stat. 42.)
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.SD.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Allan J. Marter, Chief Financial Officer of Aurelio Resource Corporation, certify, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 of Aurelio Resource Corporation that:



| | (1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Aurelio Resource Corporation.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|                                       
|/s/ Allan J. Marter                    
|Allan J. Marter Chief Financial
Officer
|                                       
|March 29, 2007
NUMBER 13-20-00318-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

RAYMOND TRENT PETEREK, Appellant,

v.

STANLEY OEHLKE, Appellee. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 135th District Court

of Goliad County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina

Appellant, Raymond Trent Peterek, attempted to perfect an appeal from a 

judgment entered by the 135th Judicial District of Goliad County, Texas, in cause number 

18-02-0644-CV, on January 9, 2020. The notice of appeal was filed in this matter on July 

20, 2020, nearly six months after the judgment.
2

A court of appeals may only entertain a motion to extend the deadline to timely file 

a notice of appeal within a 15-day grace period. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. The times for 

filing a notice of appeal are jurisdictional, and absent a timely filed notice of appeal or an 

extension request, we must dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 2, 25.1(b), 

26.3; Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (holding that once extension 

period has passed, a party can no longer invoke an appellate court's jurisdiction).

Accordingly, the motion for leave to file notice of appeal is hereby DENIED. 

Furthermore, the Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and 

appellant’s failure to timely perfect his appeal and failure to timely file a motion for 

extension, is of the opinion the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.3(a).

 JAIME TIJERINA 

 Justice

Delivered and filed the 

19th day of November, 2020.
§ 905.202 Ineligible activities and costs. The following are ineligible activities and costs for the CFP: ( a ) Costs not associated with a public housing project or development, as defined in § 905.604(b)(1);
( b ) Activities and costs not included in the PHA's CFP 5-Year Action Plan, with the exception that expenditures for emergencies and disasters, as defined in § 905.204 of this subpart, that are not identified in the 5-year Action Plan because of their emergent nature are eligible costs;
( c ) Improvements or purchases that are not modest in design and cost because they include amenities, materials, and design in excess of what is customary for the locality. Air conditioning is an eligible modest amenity;
( d ) Any costs not authorized as outlined in 2 CFR part 200, subpart E, including, but not limited to, indirect administrative costs and indemnification;
( e ) Public housing operating assistance, except as provided in § 905.314(l) of this part;
( f ) Direct provision of social services through either force account or contract labor. Examples of ineligible direct social services include, but are not limited to, salaries for social workers or GED teachers;
( g ) Eligible costs that are in excess of the amount directly attributable to the public housing units when the physical or management improvements, including salaries and employee benefits and contributions, will benefit programs other than public housing, such as section 8 Housing Choice Voucher or local revitalization programs;
( h ) Ineligible management improvements include: ( 1 ) Costs for security guards or ongoing security services (Capital Funds may only be used for the initial capital (e.g., fencing, lights, and cameras) or noncapital (e.g., training of in-house security staff) management improvements but may not be used for the ongoing costs, such as security guards after the end of the implementation period of the physical improvements);
( 2 ) General remedial education; and
( 3 ) Job counseling, job development and placement, supportive services during training, and the hiring of a resident coordinator. No continued Capital Funds will be provided after the end of the implementation period of the management improvements. The PHA shall be responsible for finding other funding sources, reducing its ongoing management costs, or terminating the management activities;
( i ) Eligible cost that is funded by another source and would result in duplicate funding; and
( j ) Any other activities and costs that HUD may determine on a case-by-case basis.
[78 FR 63770, Oct. 24, 2013, as amended at 80 FR 75942, Dec. 7, 2015]