alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Digital geologic map and GIS database of Venezuela

By: Christopher P. Garrity**Paul C. Hackley**Franco Urbani

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds199

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- Companion File:  **Companion Files**
- Read Me:  **Read Me**                            (txt)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 12
- 00213
- CV JUDYTH T. GONZALEZ , Appellant v. CHARLES RENE OCHOA, II , Appellee

From the 378th District Court Ellis County, Texas Trial Court No. 81785D

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Judyth T. Gonzalez appeals the trial court’s enforcement order in an underlying divorce proceeding. Gonzalez’ docketing statement was due July 17, 2012. It was not received. By letter dated July 30, 2012, the Clerk of this Court notified Gonzalez that the docketing statement had not been filed and must be filed within 21 days from the date of the letter. No docketing statement was received. By letter dated August 28, 2012, the Clerk of this Court again notified Gonzalez that the docketing statement had not been
filed and warned Gon zalez that if the docketing statement was not filed within 14 daysGonzalez v. Ochoa Page 2

from the date of the letter, the appeal would be dismissed. More than 14 days have passed and no docketing statement has been received. This appeal is dismissed. T EX

. R. A PP
. P . 42.3(b), (c). Absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing fees at the time a document is presented for filing. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 12.1(b); Appendix to T EX

. R. A PP

. P ., Order Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007). S e e also T EX

. R.
A PP

. P . 5; 10 TH T EX

. A PP

. (W ACO ) L OC

. R. 5; T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . §§ 51.207(b); 51.208 (West Supp. 2012); § 51.941(a) (West 2005). Under these circumstances, we suspend the rule and order the Clerk to write off all unpaid filing fees in this case. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 2.
The write

- off of the fees from the accounts receivable of the Court in no way eliminates
or reduces the fees owed.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Judge Harrison 1 Appeal dismi ssed Opinion delivered and filed September 27, 2012 [CV06]

1 Glen Harrison , Judge of the 32nd District Court of Nolan County, sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to section 74.003(h) of the Government Code. See T EX

. G OV ' T C ODE A NN

. § 74.003(h) ( West 2005 ).
Editorial Note on Part 982
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999, and at 89 FR 38293, May 7, 2024.

§ 982.312 Absence from unit. ( a ) The family may be absent from the unit for brief periods. For longer absences, the PHA Administrative Plan establishes the PHA policy on how long the family may be absent from the assisted unit. However, the family may not be absent from the unit for a period of more than 180 consecutive calendar days in any circumstance, or for any reason. At its discretion, the PHA may allow absence for a lesser period in accordance with PHA policy.
( b ) Housing assistance payments terminate if the family is absent for longer than the maximum period permitted. The term of the HAP contract and assisted lease also terminate. (The owner must reimburse the PHA for any housing assistance payment for the period after the termination.)
( c ) Absence means that no member of the family is residing in the unit.
( d ) ( 1 ) The family must supply any information or certification requested by the PHA to verify that the family is residing in the unit, or relating to family absence from the unit. The family must cooperate with the PHA for this purpose. The family must promptly notify the PHA of absence from the unit, including any information requested on the purposes of family absences.
( 2 ) The PHA may adopt appropriate techniques to verify family occupancy or absence, including letters to the family at the unit, phone calls, visits or questions to the landlord or neighbors.
( e ) The PHA Administrative Plan must state the PHA policies on family absence from the dwelling unit. The PHA absence policy includes: ( 1 ) How the PHA determines whether or when the family may be absent, and for how long. For example, the PHA may establish policies on absences because of vacation, hospitalization or imprisonment; and
( 2 ) Any provision for resumption of assistance after an absence, including readmission or resumption of assistance to the family.
(February 21, 1978)

#### John J. Feola, Appellant, v Betty Guccione et al., Respondents.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 30, 1977, which denied his renewed motion for a general preference. Order reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Under the circumstances of this case, Special Term improvidently exercised its discretion in denying plaintiff’s motion for a general preference. Martuscello, J. P., Damiani, Titone and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
### §10703. Procedures of masters

(a) If the vessel is proceeding to the United States when a seaman dies, the master shall deliver the seaman's money, property, and wages when the agreement required by this part is ended, as provided in section 10706 of this title.

(b) If the vessel touches at a foreign port after the death of the seaman, the master shall report to the first available consular officer. The consular officer may require the master to deliver to the officer the money, property, and wages of the seaman. The consular officer shall give the master a receipt for the matters delivered and certify on the agreement the particulars of the delivery. When the agreement ends, the master shall deliver the receipt to a district court of the United States.

(c) If the consular officer does not require the master to deliver the seaman's money, property, and wages, the officer shall so certify on the agreement, and the master shall dispose of the money, property, and wages as provided under section 10706 of this title.

(d) A deduction from the account of a deceased seaman is valid only if certified by a proper entry in the official logbook.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 573; Pub. L. 103–206, title IV, §418, Dec. 20, 1993, 107 Stat. 2438.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 10703 | 46:622 |

Section 10703 provides for the disposal by the master of the property and wages of deceased seamen who have died outside the United States.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1993—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–206, §418(1), substituted "in section 10706 of this title" for "by regulations prescribed by the Secretary".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–206, §418(2), substituted "to a district court of the United States" for "as prescribed by regulations".

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 103–206, §418(3), substituted "section 10706 of this title" for "subsection (a) of this section".
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM RAGEN
MACKENZIE'S DECEMBER 31, 1998 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-25-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           7,419
<RECEIVABLES>                                  129,726
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                            488,966
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                            5,278
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            135,469
<PP&E>                                           1,266
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 773,504
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                     478,827
<REPOS-SOLD>                                    42,500
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                             124,385
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           135
<OTHER-SE>                                     112,576
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   773,504
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                8,261
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                             9,375
<COMMISSIONS>                                    8,362
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                    1,490
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,771
<COMPENSATION>                                  10,821
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,936
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,571
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,571
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
        

</TABLE>
(No. 91-CC-0177

#### Regugio Raygoza and Allstate Insurance Co., as Subrogee, Claimants, *v.*The State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed August 31, 1992.*

Simon, McClosky & Scovell, for Claimant.

Roland W. Burris, Attorney General (Steven Schmall, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

OPINION

JANN, J.

This claim sounding in tort was brought for property damages to Claimant Raygozas automobile arising out of a collision with Illinois State Police Officer, Ivan Martinez, on August 3, 1989.

Claimant was northbound on Damen Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, and Officer Martinez was eastbound on 23rd Street. Officer Martinez testified that he was pursuing an alleged offender in a vehicle which had failed to stop at the stop sign on 23rd Street at Damen Avenue. Officer Martinez was driving an unmarked police car and stated he had activated a mars light which he had placed and held on the dash prior to arriving at the intersection in question. He testified that as he entered the intersection, he thought Claimant was going to yield even though *320there was no traffic control signal applicable to Claimant.

Claimant testified he saw a white vehicle come into the intersection from 23rd Street without making a complete stop. The white car cut in front of him and proceeded north on Damen. This vehicle was the object of Officer Martinez’ pursuit. Claimant slowed down to avoid colliding with the errant vehicle before crossing the intersection. He slammed on his brakes but was unable to avoid the collision with Officer Martinez’ car which was in pursuit of the white car. Claimant never saw the flashing mars light prior to the collision.

Evidence of property damage to Claimant’s vehicle was presented. Repairs totaled $1,254.19. Claimant was paid $754.19 by Allstate Insurance Company and paid a deductible of $500.

Assuming, *arguendo,*that Officer Martinez was displaying the mars light on his dash immediately preceding the collision, it is still the responsibility of the police officer to make sure that a vehicle operating legally with the right-of-way is going to stop before entering an intersection. The cause of this collision was the officer’s failure to yield the right-of-way to Claimant’s vehicle. Claimant’s property damage was the proximate result of Respondent’s negligence.

Wherefore, Claimant is awarded $500 for the deductible amount of his insurance policy and Allstate Insurance Company, as subrogee, is awarded $754.19 for repair of the vehicle.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE FORM
10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             861
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      209
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  5790
<PP&E>                                               0                                       
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5791
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              540
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      5791
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   215
<CGS>                                              215
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    51
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (41)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (41)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                                      
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
121 STAT. 1346 PUBLIC LAW 110–118—NOV. 16, 2007 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2602: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007): 

June 25, considered and passed House. 

Nov. 7, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–118 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility in Iron Mountain, 

Michigan, as the ‘‘Oscar G. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 

Facility’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL 

FACILITY, IRON MOUNTAIN, MICHIGAN. 

The Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility in Iron 

Mountain, Michigan, shall after the date of the enactment of this 

Act be known and designated as the ‘‘Oscar G. Johnson Department 

of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility’’. Any reference to that medical 

facility in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other 

paper of the United States shall be considered to be a reference 

to the Oscar G. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 

Facility. 

Approved November 16, 2007. 

Nov. 16, 2007 

[H.R. 2602] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29 with PUBLIC LAWS
###### Editorial Note on Part 985

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 985 appear at 64 FR 67983, Dec. 3, 1999.

#### § 985.108 SEMAP records.

HUD shall maintain SEMAP files, including certifications, notifications, appeals, corrective action plans, and related correspondence for at least 3 years.

(Information collection requirements in this section have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2577-0215)
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION






<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of ASPI,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the  period  ending  March 31,  2010 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report")  I, Look  Yuen  Ling,
Principal  Executive Officer,  President,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to 18 USC section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  May 24, 2010

Name: Look Yuen Ling

/s/ Look Yuen Ling
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Look Yuen Ling, (Principal Executive & Financial Officer,
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Slip Op. 04-29 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE BEFORE: RICHARD W. GOLDBERG, SENIOR JUDGE

ILVA LAMIERE E TUBI S.R.L. and ILVA S.P.A.,

Plaintiffs,
v. UNITED STATES,

Defendant, and BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION and UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION,

Defendant-Intervenors. Court No. 00-00127

JUDGMENT ORDER Upon consideration of the Department of Commerce’s Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand (“Redetermination Results”) filed pursuant to the Court’s decision in ILVA Lamiere e Tubi S.r.l. and ILVA S.p.A. v. United States , Slip Op. 03-97 (July 29, 2003), and all other papers filed herein, and no parties having filed comments regarding the Redetermination Results, it is hereby ORDERED that the Redetermination Results are sustained in all respects. SO ORDERED. /s/ Richard W. Goldberg

_____________________________ Richard W. Goldberg Senior Judge Dated: March 26, 2004

New York, New York
# Patent

## Title
Immobilization of active protein by cross-linking to inactive protein

## Abstract

Five micrograms of the eukaryotic expression vector and 5 ug of that vector with the HBsAg coding sequence inserted are added to 1.0 ml HeBS, mixed well, and is CaCl.sub.2 added to a final concentration of 0.125 M while a gentle stream of air is bubbled through the mixture during addition of CaCl.sub.2 and for an additional 30 seconds. The DNA is allowed to precipitate for 30 minutes at room temperature and 0.5 ml added to 25cm.sup.2 dishes of Ltk- cells. The cells are incubated with the DNA precipitate for 1 hour at 37.degree. C./ and 5 ml of DMEM containing 5% fetal calf serum (DMEM-5) are added and incubation is continued for 3 hours at 37.degree. C. Four hours after addition of the DNA, the culture medium is removed and the cells are washed 2.times. with DMEM-.times.5. The transformed cells are incubated for an additional 24 hours in DMEM-5 at which time the growth medium is changed to selective HAT medium (DMEM-10 containing 15.0 ug/ml hypoxanthine, 0.2 ug/ml methotrexate, 5.0 ug/ml thymidine). Cells are in HAT medium for 2-3 weeks until tk.sup.+ clones are apparent. At this point a continuous cell line is established by trypinization of the clones and propagation in HAT medium, or single cell cloned lines obtained by limiting dilution of trypsinized cells in 96 well microtiter tissue culture trays. The cell lines are assayed for HBsAg as described in Example 1. HBsAg in synthesized in continuous cell lines at approximately 10.sup.3 -10.sup.4 molecules/cell/48 hours and can be amplified to approximately 10.sup.4 -10.sup.5 molecule/cell by infection with HSV. Levels of HbsAg from single cell cloned lines, expressing HBsAg, are approximately ten-fold higher than the parent continuous cell line.

## Background
## Claims

1. A process for producing a mammalian cell line having cells containing extrachromosomal eukaryotic expression vectors, which process comprises the steps of: prokaryotic plasmid in a manner which does not disrupt the prokaryotic plasmid function to form a BamHI N fragment-containing plasmid; of (a), said promoter and said gene to be expressed being operably linked to each other, and said promoter being located immediately 5' of said gene to be expressed;

2. A process according to claim 1, wherein said mammalian cell is a baby hamster kidney cell.

3. A process according to claim 1, wherein said mammalian cell is a mouse Ltk- cell.

4. The process of claim 1 wherein said mammalian cell is propagated for at least thirty cell generations in he absence of HSV.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCEPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2004-28 (the Trust) I, Nancy H. Forte, a duly elected and acting officer of Citibank, N.A. (Indenture Trustee),
do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture Trustee, that: 1. I have reviewed and examined the performance by the Indenture Trustee of the application of
trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section
6.06 of the Indenture pursuant to which the Trusts notes were issued during the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2004 (the Relevant Year); and 2. Based upon my review and examination described in 1 above, and except as provided in the
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Compliance, dated March 15, 2005,
prepared by the Ernst & Young LLP substantially in accordance with Section 4.05 of the Expense and
Indemnity Agreement, to the best of my knowledge, the application of trust money collected by the
Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the Indenture was
performed in accordance with the terms of the Indenture throughout the Relevant Year. CITIBANK, N.A., as Indenture Trustee By:
    
    /s/ Nancy H. ForteNancy H. ForteTitle: Assistant Vice PresidentDate:
    
    March 29, 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

LESTER F. ANDERSON, 

Defendant Below, 

Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF DELAWARE, 

Appellee. 

§ 

§ 

§ No. 113, 2022 

§ 

§ Court Below—Superior Court 

§ of the State of Delaware 

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. 30109009DI (N) 

§ 

§ 

 Submitted: August 30, 2022 

 Decided: September 27, 2022 

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR, Justices. 

ORDER

 After consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the appellee’s motion to 

affirm,1 and the record on appeal, we conclude that the judgment of the Superior 

Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated in its February 

28, 2022 order denying the appellant’s request that the court vacate his first-degree 

murder conviction and life sentence. 

1

 The appellant’s request for leave to respond to the motion to affirm is denied. Under Supreme 

Court Rule 25(a), a response to a motion to affirm is not permitted unless requested by the Court. 

The Court did not request a response to the motion to affirm and finds no reason to request a 

response after considering the appellant’s motion. 
2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion for leave to respond 

to the motion to affirm is DENIED, the motion to affirm is GRANTED, and the 

judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Chief Justice