John R. Kaslch, Governor

Mary Taylor, Lt. Governor

Scott J. Nally, Director



## DEC 12 

## 20t2·

Susan Hedman Regional Administrator

U.S. EPA, Region 5

77 West Jackson Blvd. R-19J Chicago, Illinois 60604-3507

Re: Request for Review and Approval of the Revised Columbus Area Maintenance Plan Approval for the 1997 Eight-Hour Ozone Standard

Dear Administrator Hedman:

I am writing to formally request review and approval of a revision to the maintenance plan for

the Columbus area (Delaware, Fairfield, Franklin, Knox, Licking, and Madison Counties) with
respect to the 1997 eight-hour ozone standard. Ohio EPA submitted a redesignation request

and maintenance plan for this area on. U.S. EPA approved this requests on September 15,

2009 (74FR 47404).

Ohio EPA is now requesting a revision to the maintenance plan to update mobile emission projections and conformity budgets based on emission rates generated from U.S. EPA's

latest mobile emissions model, the Motor Vehicle Emission Simulation (MOVES) 2010. In

December 2009, MOVES replaced MOBILE6.2 as the U.S. EPA's official emission factor

model. The area is still attaining and maintaining the 1997 8-hour ozone standard and the point, area and non-road emissions have not changed significantly and did not need to be updated for this submittal.

The enclosed information was compiled by Ohio EPA, Ohio Department of Transportation, and Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission. The public hearing for

this package was held on December 4, 2012 in Columbus, Ohio. Testimony was provided in support of the revised request during the public hearing. A copy of this testimony is provided in appendix E.

This submittal consists of one (1) hard copy of the required documentation. An exact duplicate

electronic version of the submittal in PDF format is available at ·'**~··· -:~.·**  'r**~.**

50 West Town Street • Suite 700 • P.O. Box 1049 • Columbus, OH 43216-1049

www.epa.ohio.gov • (614) 644-3020 • (614) 644-3184 (fax)

### http://epa.ohio.gov/dapc/SIP/1997.aspx under the heading "Redesignations and Maintenance

Plans".

If you have any questions, please contact Jennifer Dines in the Division of Air Pollution

Control at (614) 644-3696.

Sincerely,

# tc::J~ Director

enclosures

cc: Bob Hodanbosi, DAPC

Jennifer Dines, DAPC

# REDESIGNATION REQUEST AND

MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR THE COLUMBUS, OH

OZONE

NONATTAINMENT AREA

Prepared by: Ohio Environmental Protection Agency

Division of Air Pollution Control

March 2009

Revised December 2012

### This page left intentionally blanki 

## TABLE OF CONTENTS

Chapter One

Introduction .................................................................................................................. ................. 1 Background .................................................................................................................... ............... 1 Geographical description ...................................................................................................... ........ 2 Status of air quality ......................................................................................................... .............. 2

Chapter Two Requirements for redesignation ................................................................................................ .... 3

Chapter Three Ozone monitoring .......................................................................................................................... 6
Ozone NAAQS ................................................................................................................... ........... 6 Ambient data quality assured ........................................................................................................ 7 Three complete years of data .................................................................................................. ..... 8 Commitment to continue monitoring ........................................................................................... 1 0

Chapter Four Emission inventory ............................................................................................................ .......... 11 Base year inventory ........................................................................................................... ......... 11 Emission projections .......................................................................................................... ......... 11

Demonstration of maintenance .................................................................................................. . 17

Permanent and enforceable emissions reductions ..................................................................... 25 Provisions for future updates ................................................................................................. ..... 25

Chapter Five Control measures and regulations .............................................................................................. 26 Marginal Nonattainment areas to implement RACT ................................................................... 26

Emission inventories/statements ............................................................................................... . 26 Implementation of past SIP revisions .......................................................................................... 26 New source review provisions ................................................................................................. .. 29

Assurance of continued controls ............................................................................................... .. 29

Chapter Six Contingency measures .......................................................................................................... ..... 30 Commitment to revise plan ..................................................................................................... .... 30 Commitment for contingency measures ..................................................................................... 30 Potential contingency measures ................................................................................................ . 31

List of VOC and NO

x sources...................................................................................................... 33

Chapter Seven Public participation .......................................................................................................... ............ 34

Chapter Eight

Conclusions ................................................................................................................... ............. 35ii FIGURES

Figure 1 Columbus Basic Nonattainment Area.................................................................... 7

TABLES

Table 1 Monitoring Data for Columbus 2006 – 2008 .......................................................... 9

Table 2 Emission Estimations for On-road Mobile Sources for Delaware Co. ................. 15

Table 3 Emission Estimations for On-road Mobile Sources for Fairfield Co. .................... 15

Table 4 Emission Estimations for On-road Mobile Sources for Franklin Co. .................... 15

Table 5 Emission Estimations for On-road Mobile Sources for Knox Co. ........................ 15 Table 6 Emission Estimations for On-road Mobile Sources for Licking Co. ..................... 16

Table 7 Emission Estimations for On-road Mobile Sources for Madison Co. ................... 16

Table 8 Emission Estimations for On-road Total Columbus Sources ............................... 16 Table 9 Mobile Vehicle Emission Budget ......................................................................... 16 Table 10 VOC Emission Inventory Delaware Co. ............................................................... 18 Table 11 VOC Emission Inventory Fairfield Co. ................................................................. 19 Table 12 VOC Emission Inventory Franklin Co. ................................................................. 19 Table 13 VOC Emission Inventory Knox Co. ...................................................................... 19 Table 14 VOC Emission Inventory Licking Co. ................................................................... 20 Table 15 VOC Emission Inventory Madison Co. ................................................................ 20 Table 16 VOC Emission Inventory Columbus, Total .......................................................... 21

Table 17 NO

x Emission Inventory Delaware Co. ................................................................ 21

Table 18 NO

x Emission Inventory Fairfield Co. .................................................................. 21

Table 19 NO

x Emission Inventory Franklin Co. .................................................................. 22

Table 20 NO

x Emission Inventory Knox Co. ....................................................................... 22

Table 21 NO

x Emission Inventory Licking Co. .................................................................... 23

Table 22 NO

x Emission Inventory Madison Co. ................................................................. 23

Table 23 NO

x Emission Inventory Columbus Totals ........................................................... 23 Table 24 Projected Emission Estimates 2006-2018 Columbus.......................................... 24 Table 25 Combined Comparison of 2002 and 2006 On-road and EGU Totals .................. 25

APPENDICES

A Air Quality System (AQS) Data B Ohio 2002 SIP Base Year Inventory Discussion

C Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emissions Estimates D LADCO Technical Support Document E Public Participation Documentationiii 

### This page left intentionally blank1 

### REDESIGNATION REQUEST AND MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR THE COLUMBUS, OHIO OZONE

NONATTAINMENT AREA



## CHAPTER ONE

Introduction The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires areas failing to meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone to develop State Implementation Plans (SIP’s) to expeditiously attain and maintain the standard. In 1997, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) revised the air quality standard for ozone replacing the 1979 one-hour standard with an eight-hour ozone standard set at 0.08 par ts per million (ppm). The standard was challenged legally and upheld by t he U.S. Supreme Cour t in February of

2001.

On April 30, 2004, U.S. EPA designated 134 nonatta inment areas for t he eight-hour ozone standard. Since that time, U.S. EPA has recla ssified nine of the 134 original nonattainment

areas to the next lower classification. Sect ion 107(d)(3)(E) of the C AA allows states to request nonattainment areas to be redesignated to attainment pr ovided certain criteria are met. The following are the criteria that must be met in order for an ar ea to be redesignated

from nonattainment to attainment:

i) A determination that the area has a ttained the eight-hour ozone standard. ii) An approved State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the area under Section 110(k). iii) A determination that the improvement in air qua lity is due to permanent

and enforceable reductions in emissions resulting fr om implementation of

the SIP and other f ederal requirements. iv) A fully approved maintenance plan under Section 175(A). v) A determination that all Section 110 and Part D requirements have been

met.

Background

The Columbus nonattainment area includes the following Counties: Delaware, Fairfield, Franklin, Knox, Licking, and Madison. As par t of the 1990 CAA Amendm ents re-evaluation,

the Counties within the Colum bus area were designated as follows for the one-hour ozone standard pursuant to the CAA: Delaware , Franklin and Licking were designated as marginal nonattainment and therefore were subj ect to nonattainment area rulemakings. Fairfield, Knox and Madison were designated as unclassifiable/attainment and therefore were not subject to nonattainment area rulemakings. The Columbus area was redesignated to attainment with respect to the one-hour ozone st andard on February 1, 1996 (61FR3591). A maintenance plan was approved at that time. The mobile budget for this maintenance plan was adjusted on July 10, 1998 (63FR37255) to take credit for additional federal programs for area sources and transfer the resulting increased safety margin to the mobile sources budget.2 

### As a result of the 2004 ozone designations, U. S. EPA designated the Columbus area basic nonattainment for the eight-hour standard and Oh io EPA was required to develop a plan to reduce volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides (NO

x 

### ) emissions and to demonstrate that the area will meet the federal eight-hour ai r quality standard for ozone by

June 2009.

This document is intended to support Ohio ’s request that the Columbus area be redesignated from nonattainment to attainment for the eight-hour ozone standard. The Columbus area has recorded three (3) years of complete quality-assured ambient air quality monitoring data for the years 2006 – 2008 demonstrating attainment of the eighthour ozone standard.

Geographical Description The Columbus eight-hour ozone nonattainment area is located in central Ohio and includes the Counties of Delaware, Fairfield, Franklin, Knox, Licking and Madison. This area is shown is shown in Figure 1 under Chapter Three.

Status of Air Quality Ozone monitoring data for the most recent three (3) years, 2006 through 2008, demonstrate that the air quality has met the NAAQS for ozone in this basic nonattainment area. The NAAQS attainment, accompanied by decreases in emission levels discussed in Chapter Four, supports a redesi gnation to attainment for the Columbus area based on the requirements in Section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA.3 

## CHAPTER TWO

Requirements for Redesignation U.S. EPA has published detailed gui dance in a document entitled Procedures for Processing Requests to Redesignate Areas to Attainment (redesignation guidance), issued September 4, 1992, to Regional Air Directors. The redesignation request and maintenance plan are based on the redesignation guidanc e, supplemented with additional guidance received from staff of U.S. EPA Region V.

Below is a summary of each redesignation crit erion as it applies to the Columbus area.

i.) Attainment of the standard There are two components involved in ma king this demonstration. The first component relies on ambient air quality data. The data that are used to demonstrate attainment should be the pr oduct of ambient monitoring that is representative of the area of highest concentration. The data should be collected and quality-assured in accor dance with 40 CFR 58 and recorded in the Air Quality System (AQS) in order for it to be available to the public for

review.

The second component relies upon s upplemental U.S. EPA-approved air quality modeling. The s upplemental modeling is not required for ozone nonattainment areas seeking redesignat ion; however, in Appendix C and Appendix D the most recent modeling re sults showing future attainment and maintenance are provided. Chapter Th ree discusses this requirement in more detail and provides the attainment demonstration.

ii.) SIP approval The SIP for the area must be fully approved under Section 110(k) and must satisfy all the requirements that apply to the area. Ohio’s SIP was approved on May 9, 1994 (59FR23799), March 23, 1995 (60FR15235), and February 1, 1996 (61FR3591) and includes the Co lumbus area. Chapter Five discusses this requirement in more.

iii.) Permanent and enforceable im provement in air quality The state must be able to reasonably a ttribute the improvement in air quality to emission reductions which are pe rmanent and enforceabl e. The state should estimate the percent reduction achieved from federal measures as

well as control measures that have been adopted and implemented by the

state.

The Delaware, Franklin and Licking C ounties portion of the Columbus area was designated marginal nonattainment for ozone as part of the 1990 CAA

Amendments re-evaluation. The Fair field, Knox, and Madison Counties portion of the Columbus area was designated unclassifiable/attainment for ozone as part of the 1990 C AA Amendments re-evaluation. As a result, it4 

### was not necessary for Ohio to adopt or implement control measures for these Counties beyond the federal measures, t he initial 1979/1981 Statewide rules, and those 1994 and 1995 rules which applied to “rural” attainment areas. However, Ohio EPA has adopted several rules recently that will have an impact Statewide on ozone emissions in the future:

• Portable Fuel Containers requirements

• Architectural and Industrial Maintenance (AIM) Coatings rules

• Consumer Products rules

• Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR)

Chapters Four and Five discuss this requirement in more detail..

iv.) Section 110 and Part D requirements For purposes of redesignation, a state mu st meet all requir ements of Section 110 and Part D that were applicable prio r to submittal of the complete redesignation request.

Part D consists of general requirem ents applicable to all areas which are designated nonattainment based on a violation of the NAAQS.

i.) Section 110(a) requirements Section 110(a) of Title I of the C AA contains the general requirements for a SIP. Section 110(a)(2) provi des that the impl ementation plan submitted by a state must hav e been adopted by the state after reasonable public notice and hearing, and that, among other things, it

must include enforceable emission limitations and other control measures, means or techniques nece ssary to meet the requirements of the CAA; provide for establishment and operation of appropriate devices, methods, systems and procedures necessary to monitor ambient air quality; provide for im plementation of a source permit program to regulate the modification and construction of any stationary source within the areas covered by the plan; include provisions for the implementation of Part C, prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) and Part D, NSR permit programs; include criteria for stationary source emission c ontrol measures, monitoring, and reporting; include provisions for ai r quality modeling; and provides for public and local agency participation in planning and emission control rule development. In Ohio’s Dece mber 5, 2007 infrastructure SIP submission, Ohio verified that the State fulfills the requirements of Section 110(a)(2) of the Act.

ii.) Section 172(c) requirements This Section contains general r equirements for nonattainment plans. The requirements for reasonable further progress, identification of5 

### certain emissions increases, and other measures needed for attainment will not apply for redesi gnations because they only have meaning for areas not attaining the standard. The r equirements for an emission inventory will be satisfied by the inventory requirements of the maintenance plan. Chapter s Four and Five discuss this requirement in more detail.

ii.) Conformity

The state must work with U.S. EPA to show that its SIP provisions are consistent with Section 176(c)(4) conformity requirements. The redesignation request should include conformity procedures, if the state already has these procedures in place. If a state does not have conformity procedures in place at the time that it submits a redesignation request, the state mu st commit to follow U.S. EPA’s conformity regulation upon issuance, as applicable.

v.) Maintenance plans Section 107(d)(3)(E) stipulates that for an area to be redesignated, U.S. EPA must fully approve a maintenance plan that meets the requirements of Section 175(A). The maintenance plan must constitute a SIP revision and must provide for maintenance of the rele vant NAAQS in the area for at least 10 years after redesignation. Section 175 (A) further states that the plan shall contain such additional measures, if any, as may be necessary to

ensure such maintenance.

In addition, the maintenance plan shall contain such contingency measures as the Administrator deems necessary to ensure prompt correction of any

violation of the NAAQS. At a mini mum, the contingency measures must include a requirement that the state will implement all measures contained in the nonattainment SIP prior to redesignation.

States seeking redesignat ion of a nonattainment ar ea should consider the following provisions:

a.) attainment inventory; b.) maintenance demonstration; c.) monitoring network; d.) verification of continued attainment; and e.) contingency plan.

Chapter Six discusses this requirement in more detail.6 

## CHAPTER THREE

OZONE MONITORING CAA Section107 (d)(3)(E)(i)

Requirement 1 of 4

A demonstration that the NAAQS for ozone, as published in 40 CFR 50.4, has been

attained.

Background There are eight monitors measur ing ozone concentrations in this

nonattainment area. These monitors are operated by Ohio EPA Division of Air Pollution Control, Central District Office. A listing of the design values based on the three-year average of t he annual fourth highes t daily maximum eight-hour average ozone concentrations from 2006 through 2008 are shown

in Table 1. The locations of the monitoring si tes for this nonattainment area are shown on Figure 1.7 

### Demonstration

Figure 1 Map of the Columbus, OH nonattainment area and monitor

locations

Requirement 2 of 4 Ambient monitoring data quality assured in acco rdance with 40 CFR 58.10, recorded in the U.S. EPA air quality system (AQS) database, and available for public view.

Demonstration The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA) has quality assured all data shown in Appendix A in accordance wit h 40 CFR 58.10 and the Ohio Quality

Assurance Manual. Ohio EPA has recorded the data in the AQS database and therefore data are available to the public.8 

### Requirement 3 of 4 A showing that the three-year average of the fourth highest values, based on data from all monitoring sites in the area or its affe cted downwind environs, are below 85 parts per billion (ppb). (This showing must rely on th ree (3) complete, consecutive calendar years of quality assured data.)

Background The following information is taken from U.S. EPA's "Guideline on Data Handling Conventions for the eight-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)," U.S. EPA- 454/R-98-017, December 1998.

Three (3) complete years of oz one monitoring data are required to

demonstrate attainment at a monitori ng site. The eight-hour primary and secondary ozone ambient air quality st andards are met at an ambient air quality monitoring site when the three- year average of t he annual fourthhighest daily maximum eight-hour aver age ozone concentrations is less than or equal to 0.08 ppm. When this occurs, the site is said to be in attainment. Three (3) significant digits must be ca rried in the computations. Because the third decimal digit, in ppm , is rounded, 0.084 ppm is th e largest concentration that is less than or equal to 0.08 ppm. Therefore, for the purposes of this request, the eight-hour standard is cons idered to be 0.085 ppm. Values below 0.085 ppm meet the standard, values equal to or greater than 0.085 ppm exceed the standard. These dat a handling procedures are applied on

an individual basis at each monitor in t he area. An area is in compliance with the eight-hour ozone NAAQS if, and only if, every monitoring site in the area

meets the NAAQS. An individual site 's three (3)-year average of the annual fourth highest daily maximum eight- hour average ozone concentrations is also called the site's design value.

Table 1 shows the monitoring data for 2006 – 2008 that were retrieved from the U.S. EPA AQS. The air quality des ign value for the area is the highest design value among all sites in the area. Please note that the standard is measured in ppm while the commonly used unit is ppb. For the remainder of this document, ppb will be used.9 

### Demonstration

Table 1 Monitoring Data for the Columbus, OH area for 2006 – 2008

Data source: U.S. EPA Air Quality System (AQS) http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/index.htm

1 s t 2 n d 3 r d 4 th 2006-2008

SITE ID COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR %OBS 8-HR 8-HR 8-HR 8-HR AVERAGE

39-041-

0002 Delaware Delaware 2006 100 86 84 76 75

76 39-041-

0002 Delaware Delaware 2007 100 87 83 81 80

39-041-

0002 Delaware Delaware 2008 99 80 76 75 75

39-049-

0028 Franklin Koebel

School 2006 100 86 80 76 76

74 39-049-

0028 Franklin Koebel

School 2007 100 85 82 81 78

39-049-

0028 Franklin Koebel

School 2008 99 78 70 69 69

39-049- 0029 Franklin New Albany 2006 99 87 85 85 82

84 39-049- 0029 Franklin New Albany 2007 100 94 88 88 87

39-049- 0029 Franklin New Albany 2008 99 95 85 83 83

39-049-

0037 Franklin Franklin

Park 2006 97 86 84 80 79

76 39-049-

0037 Franklin Franklin

Park 2007 98 89 81 81 79

39-049-

0037 Franklin Franklin

Park 2008 99 87 81 72 71

39-049-

0081 Franklin Maple Canyon 2006 99 85 84 80 77

74 39-049-

0081 Franklin Maple Canyon 2007 100 86 83 80 79

39-049-

0081 Franklin Maple Canyon 2008 100 88 73 66 66

39-083- 0002 Knox Centerburg 2006 98 85 82 76 75

76 39-083- 0002 Knox Centerburg 2007 100 88 82 82 80

39-083- 0002 Knox Centerburg 2008 100 77 75 75 7410 1 s t 2 n d 3 r d 4 th 2006-2008

SITE ID COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR %OBS 8-HR 8-HR 8-HR 8-HR AVERAGE

39-089- 0005 Licking Heath 2006 100 82 77 74 72

74 39-089- 0005 Licking Heath 2007 100 83 82 80 78

39-089- 0005 Licking Heath 2008 99 78 76 75 74

39-097-

0007 Madison London 2006 100 84 81 79 76

76 39-097-

0007 Madison London 2007 99 91 86 84 83

39-097-

0007 Madison London 2008 99 77 75 73 71

Highest Average 84 ppb



### The area's design values have tr ended downward as emissions have

declined due to such factors as cleaner automobiles and fuels, both regionally and locally.

Requirement 4 of 4 A commitment that once redesignated, the state will continue to operate an appropriate monitoring network to verify the maintenance of the attainment status.

Demonstration

Ohio EPA commits to continue monitori ng ozone levels at the sites indicated in Figure 1. Ohio EPA will consult wit h U.S. EPA Region V prior to making changes to the existing monitori ng network, should changes become necessary in the future. Ohio EPA will continue to quality assure the monitoring data to meet the requirem ents of 40 CFR 58 and all other federal requirements. Connection to a centra l station and updates to the Ohio EPA

web site 1 

### will provide real time availabilit y of the data and knowledge of any

exceedances. Ohio EPA will enter all data into AQS on a timely basis in accordance with federal guidelines.

1 www.epa.state.oh.us/dapc/11 

## CHAPTER FOUR

EMISSION INVENTORY CAA Section107 (d)(3)(E)(iii)

U.S. EPA’s redesignation guidance requires the s ubmittal of a compr ehensive inventory of ozone precursor emissions (VOC and NO

x 

### ) representative of t he year when the area

achieves attainment of the oz one air quality standard. Ohio also must demonstrate that the improvement in air qua lity between the year that violat ions occurred and the year that attainment was achieved is based on pe rmanent and enforceable emission reductions. Other emission inventory related requirements include a projecti on of the emission inventory to a year at least 10 years follo wing redesignation; a demonstration that the projected level of emi ssions is sufficient to maintain the ozone standard; and a commitment to provide future updates of the inventory to enable tracking of emission levels during the 10-year maintenance period.

Requirement 1 of 5 A comprehensive emission inventory of the pr ecursors of ozone completed for the base

year.

Background The point source data are taken fr om Ohio's annual emissions reporting program. The 2002 periodic inventor y has been identifi ed as one of the preferred data bases for SIP developm ent and coincides with nonattainment air quality in the Columbus area.

Periodic inventories, which include emissi ons from all sectors - mobile, area, non-road, and point sources - are prepared every three (3) years.

Demonstration The 2002 inventory is used as the base y ear for the purpose of this submittal

and was submitted to U.S. EPA on J une 15, 2007 along with the attainment

demonstration for the Cleveland-Akron- Lorain area. The detailed emission inventory information for the Columbus area is provided in Appendix B.

Emissions of VOC and NOx for 2002 are identified under Requirement Three of this Chapter.

Requirement 2 of 5 A projection of the emi ssion inventory to a year at leas t 10 years following redesignation.

Background Ohio EPA prepared a comprehensive inventor y for the Columbus area including area, mobile, and point sources for precursors of ozone (VOCs and NO

x 

### ) for base years 2002 and 2005. The 2002 inventory was s ubmitted to U.S. EPA on June 15, 2007 and then supplemented on February 22, 2008 with the 2005 inv entory, as part12 

### of the attainment demonstration for the Cleveland-Akron-Lorain area. The information below describes the proc edures Ohio EPA used to generate the 2002 base year inventory and to develop SIP-ready modeling inventories and future year projections (Pechan Report 2 

### ) based on a 2005 base year inv entory. The report by Pechan generated future year es timates of annual emissions for each source sector using accepted growth surrogates. T he on-road mobile source sector was addressed by specific modeling as addre ssed below. These inventories were provided to the Lake Michigan Air Direc tors Consortium (LADCO) and have been processed to develop summer day emissions for use in the air quality analyses. These processed modeling inventories have been identified as the correct iteration of the inventory for use in the redesignati on. In this document, references to LADCO include the Midwest Regional Planning Organization.

• Area sources were taken from the Ohio 2005 periodic inventory

submitted to U.S. EPA. These projections were made from the U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) growth factors, with some updated local information.

• Mobile source emissions were calculated from MOVES2010 produced

emission factors.

• Point source information was compiled from Ohio EPA’s 2005 annual emissions inventory database and the 2005 U.S. EPA Air Markets

acid rain database 3



### .

• Biogenic emissions are not included in these summaries.

• Non-road emissions were generated using U.S. EPA’s National Mobile Inventory Model (NMIM) 2002 applicat ion. To address concerns about the accuracy of some of t he categories in U.S. EPA’s non-road emissions model, LADCO contract ed with two (2) companies to

review the base data and make recommendations. One of the

contractors also estimated emissions for three (3) non-road categories

not included in U.S. EPA’s non-road mo del. Emissions were estimated for aircraft, commercial marine ve ssels, and railroads. Recreational motorboat population and spatial surrogates (used to assign emissions to each county) were si gnificantly updated. The populations for the construction equipment cat egory were reviewed and updated based upon surveys completed in the midwest, and the temporal allocation for agricultural sources also was updated.

Demonstration

2

http://www.ladco.org/tech/emis/r5/reports/L ADCO%202005%20Base%20Yr%20Growth%20and%20Controls%20R eport_Final.pdf

3 http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/acidrain13 

### On-Road Emission Estimations In coordination with the Ohio Departm ent of Transportation (ODOT) and the Licking County Area Transportation Study (LCATS), the Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission (MORPC) utilizes a regional travel demand forecast

model to simulate traffic in the area and to forecast traffic flows for given growth expectations. The model is primarily used as a long range planning tool to evaluate the transportation system including determination of locations where additional travel capacit y may be needed and to determine the infrastructure requirements necessary to meet that need. It is also used as a tool for air quality purposes to estima te the total emissions of pollution caused by vehicles in the area. The travel demand forecasting model is used to predict the total daily vehicle miles traveled (VMT ), and a U.S. EPA computer program called MOVES2010 is used to calculate emissions per mile. The product of these is the tota l amount of pollution emitted by the onroad vehicles for the area. In areas outside the regional travel demand model, traffic counts and central Ohio tr affic growth rates are used for the

VMT estimates.

Overview Broadly described, MOVES2010 is used to generate “emission factors”, which are the average emissions per mile (grams/mile) for the ozone precursors, NO

x 

### and VOC. The MOVES2010 mo del includes a number of

variables that affect the emission fa ctors. These variables have national default values, some of which require modification to reasonably reflect local

conditions. Some of these variables ar e discussed here. The vehicle fleet (vehicles on the road) age and the vehicl e type have a major effect on the emission factors. The vehicle types are traveling on facility types (MOVES facility types are Rural Restricted Acce ss, Rural Unrestricted Access, Urban
Restricted Access, and Urban Unrestricted Access). The vehicle speeds also

affect the emission factor values. Meteorological conditions such as air temperature and humidity have a signific ant effect on emission factors. Emission factors produced by MOVES2010 can also include the effect of emission reduction strategies such as vehicle inspection and maintenance programs, regulation of fuels, etc. These MOVES2010 inputs are estimated using the best available data.

These inputs are reviewed and agreed to by U.S. EPA and transportation agencies in a formal interagency consultati on process. Emission factors are multiplied by VMT from the travel demand model to estimate the total vehicle

emissions.

The emission factors from MOVES2010 can be used with the travel demand model information by combining the disaggregate emission rates with VMT, and source type population for each road type, source type and hour of day, and then sum them up to get the total emissions for the area.14 

### The Columbus area analysis method, developed by ODOT, is to aggregate the emission rates by two source ty pes (cars & trucks), then applying VMT and source type population, thereby reduci ng the intensive pr ocesses. In the first step emission factors are broadly cla ssified into total vehicles, cars and trucks by pollutant, by average speed, road type and hour of day. Then the hourly link volumes generated from trav el demand model are combined with

emission factors for each network lin k for each hour. The on-road vehicle

emissions for the area is the sum of all individual link-hour emissions. Vehicle-based emissions are obtained by the combination of corresponding emission factors and source type popul ation. Intrazonal emissions are computed using a separate method to acc ount for those trips that use local

roads to travel within a zone. Intraz onal VMT is combined with corresponding emission factors to get intrazonal emi ssions. Total emissions are sum of onroad vehicle emissions, vehicle-based emissions and intrazonal emissions.

Automated programs, using FORTRA N and CUBE scripting, were developed by ODOT to generate total emissions. The process uses data on daily and

directional traffic distributions as well as more up to date volume/delay functions from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). This process also

handles the newer model network formats and MOVES generated emission

factors.

MOVES input and output sample file s are provided in Appendix C.

Best Available Data Most current vehicle age distribution dat a, temperature data, fuel properties data, source type distribution data, and I/M data provided by ODOT’s ATRs and WIMs, NOAA, ODPS, and Ohio EPA were used by the ODOT for generating emission factors. Likewise, the most current transportation planning data available from MORPC and LCATS and most current ODOT count data were used by ODOT for the emissions estimates.

Analysis Years Analysis years for this redesignati on request include 2002, 2006 (attainment year), 2012 (interim budget year), and 2020 to meet the requirements specified by the CAA and U.S. EPA. The travel demand model presents the transportation system conditions for each of these years. Model runs for each future analysis year contain t he road network MORPC, LCATS, and ODOT expect to exist in April of t hat year with corresponding socioeconomic forecasts for that year.

Local Road VMT Most local roads such as subdivision streets are not explic itly modeled in a

travel demand model. These local r oads are represented as fictitious roadways called centroid connectors. Local road VMT is included in the15 

### ODOT post process by including the tra ffic loaded on centroid connectors. In addition, some local road traffic is capt ured as intra-zonal trips which travel demand models usually do not assign to roadway segments. The ODOT post process includes these trips as local road VMT.

Model area VMT VMT for the analysis comes mostly from the MORPC model. However, the

model does not cover the entire air quality maintenance area. For outside areas, VMT is estimated from HPMS pr ojections. This extra VMT is added into the calculations similarly to the way intrazonal VMT was.

Emission Estimations Tables 2 through 7 contain the result s of the emissions analysis for the appropriate years.

Table 2 - Delaware County Emission Estimations for On-Road Mobile

Sources

2002 2006 2012 2020 VMT (miles/day) 4,482,756 5,001,802 5,811,519 7,141,185 VOC (tons/day) 13.09 9.99 6.31 3.78 NOx (tons/day) 24.62 21.07 14.63 8.49

Table 3 - Fairfield County Emission Estimations for On-Road Mobile

Sources

2002 2006 2012 2020 VMT (miles/day) 3,012,847 3,509,902 3,692,318 4,291,725 VOC (tons/day) 6.02 5.70 3.50 2.07 NOx (tons/day) 13.03 12.68 8.12 4.65

Table 4 - Franklin County Emission Estimations for On-Road Mobile

Sources

2002 2006 2012 2020 VMT (miles/day) 30,473,707 33,989,641 34,609,039 37,688,274 VOC (tons/day) 144.87 112.93 61.46 31.88 NOx (tons/day) 224.34 194.95 118.11 59.96

Table 5 - Knox County Emission Estima tions for On-Road Mobile Sources

2002 2006 2012 2020 VMT (miles/day) 1,117,218 1,214,433 1,299,798 1,443,959 VOC (tons/day) 2.01 1.76 1.12 0.65 NOx (tons/day) 4.46 3.94 2.55 1.4416 

### Table 6 - Licking County Emission Es timations for On-Road Mobile

Sources

2002 2006 2012 2020 VMT (miles/day) 5,399,830 5,409,966 5,613,225 6,557,551 VOC (tons/day) 18.08 13.29 6.99 4.02 NOx (tons/day) 32.13 25.92 15.34 8.56

Table 7 - Madison County Emission Estimations for On-Road Mobile

Sources

2002 2006 2012 2020 VMT (miles/day) 2,373,505 2,415,515 2,586,771 2,950,763 VOC (tons/day) 5.57 3.80 2.35 1.37 NOx (tons/day) 11.24 8.47 5.47 3.09

Table 8 - Emission Estimation Totals for On-Road Mobile Sources for the

Columbus Area

2002 2006 2012 2020 VMT (miles/day) 46,859,863 51,541,259 53,612,670 60,073,457 VOC (tons/day) 189.64 147.47 81.73 43.77 NOx (tons/day) 309.82 267.03 164.22 86.19

Motor Vehicle Emission Budget

Table 9 contains the motor vehicle em issions budget for the Columbus area.

Table 9 - Mobile Vehicle Emissions Budget for the Columbus Area

2012 2020 VOC (tons/day) 93.99 50.34 NOx (tons/day) 188.85 99.12

The above budget includes the emissi on estimates calculated for 2012 and 2020 with an additional 15 percent margin of safety. The emission estimates

are derived from the Tranplan travel demand model and MOVES2010 as described above under the expected MORPC and LCATS 2030 Long Range Plans and known projects in the ar eas not included within either MPO’s jurisdiction. The additional 15 percent translates into an additional 6.57 tons/day for VOC and 12.93 tons/day fo r NOx for 2020. Appendix C contains data tables and graphs of these emissions.

All methodologies, the latest planning assumptions, and the safety margins were determined through the interagency consultation process described in the Transportation Conformity Memo randum of Underst anding (MOU) among MORPC, LCATS, Ohio DOT, and Ohio EPA.17 

### The current eight-hour budgets were adopt ed (72 FR 23815) based on a previous redesignation request submitted for the Co lumbus area. Those budgets were found adequate and adopted as a separate action as the redesignation request was not approved. Those eight-hour budgets will no longer be applicable either after the effective date of the approved redesignation or after t he effective date of any U.S. EPA action approving a finding that the ei ght-hour conformity budget included in this submittal is adequate for transportation conformity purposes, whichever date comes first.”

Requirement 3 of 5 A demonstration that the project ed level of emissions is sufficient to maintain the ozone

standard.

Background In consultation with U.S. EPA, Ohio EPA selected the year 2020 as the maintenance year for this redesignati on request. This document contains projected emissions inventories for 2012 and 2020.

Emission projections for the Colum bus area were performed using the following approaches:

• As performed by MORPC, mobile source emission projections are

based on the U.S. EPA MOVES2010 mo del. The analysis is described in more detail in Appendix C. All projections were made in

accordance with “Procedures for Preparing Emissions Projections”

U.S. EPA-45/4-91-019.

• Emissions inventories are required to be projected to future dates to assess the influence growth and futu re controls will have. LADCO has developed growth and control f iles for point, area, and non-road categories. These files were used to develop the future-year

emissions estimates used in this document. This was done so the inventories used for redesignati on are consistent with modeling performed in the future. Appendix D contains LADCO’s technical support document detailing the analysi s used to project emissions. The 2006 attainment year was grow n from the 2005 LADCO modeling inventory using LADCO’s growth fa ctors. The 2020 maintenance year was grown from the 2018 LADCO m odeling inventory using LADCO’s growth factors.

The detailed inventory information fo r the Columbus area for 2002 is in Appendix B. Emission trends are an important gauge for continued compliance with the ozone standard. T herefore, Ohio EPA performed an initial comparison of t he inventories for the base year and maintenance years. Mobile source emission inv entories are described in Section 5 of Appendix B.18 

### Sectors included in the followi ng tables are: Electrical Generating Unit (EGUPoint); Non-Electrical Generating Un it (Non-EGU); Non-road Mobile (Nonroad); Other Area (Other); Marine; Aircraft; Rail (MAR); and On-road Mobile (On-road).

Maintenance is demonstrated when t he future-year (2020) projected emission totals are below the 2006 attainment year totals.

The emissions data in the tables below are based on the following data

sources:

All On-Road Data source: MORPC Transportation and Modeling Department

All Other Data source: Midwest Regional Pl anning Organization (MRPO) and Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO) Web site (Base M): http://www.ladco.org/tech/emis/



### Demonstration

VOC

Table 10 Delaware County VOC Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012 and 2020 (tons per day)

Sector 2002 Base 2006

Attainment 2012

Interim 2020

Maintenance Safety Margin

EGU

Point n/a n/a n/a n/a

NonEGU 0.30 0.44 0.54 0.69

Nonroad 4.14 5.23 3.77 3.77

Other 5.40 5.94 4.83 4.39

MAR 0.14 0.12 0.09 0.05

Onroad 13.09 9.99 6.31 3.78

TOTAL 23.07 21.72 15.54 12.68 9.0419 

### Table 11 Fairfield County VOC Emi ssion Inventory Totals for Base Year 2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012 and 2020 (tons per day)

Sector 2002 Base 2006

Attainment 2012

Interim 2020

Maintenance Safety Margin

EGU

Point n/a n/a n/a n/a

NonEGU 0.20 0.26 0.27 0.28

Nonroad 1.87 2.16 1.61 1.61

Other 4.97 6.13 5.06 4.58

MAR 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

Onroad 6.02 5.70 3.50 2.07

TOTAL 13.07 14.26 10.45 8.55 5.71

Table 12 Franklin County VOC Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012 and 2020 (tons per day)

Sector 2002

Base 2006

Attainment 2012

Interim 2020

Maintenance Safety Margin

EGU Point n/a n/a n/a n/a

Non-EGU 3.03 3.00 3.34 3.86

Non-road 16.97 21.11 16.08 16.08

Other 43.07 46.53 36.98 32.38

MAR 0.54 0.51 0.48 0.41

On-road 144.87 112.93 61.46 31.88

TOTAL 208.48 184.08 118.34 84.61 99.47

Table 13 Knox County VOC Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012 and 2020 (tons per day)

Sector 2002

Base 2006

Attainment 2012

Interim 2020

Maintenance Safety Margin

EGU Point n/a n/a n/a n/a

Non-EGU n/a n/a n/a n/a

Non-road 1.05 1.50 1.04 1.04 0.46

Other 3.96 3.29 2.86 2.71 0.58

MAR 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

On-road 2.01 1.76 1.12 0.65

TOTAL 7.05 6.55 5.02 4.40 2.15

Table 14 Licking County VOC Emissi on Inventory Totals for Base20 

### Year 2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012 and 2020 (tons per day)

Sector 2002 Base 2006

Attainment 2012

Interim 2020

Maintenance Safety Margin

EGU

Point n/a n/a n/a n/a

NonEGU 0.49 0.52 0.58 0.70

Nonroad 2.43 3.46 2.47 2.47

Other 6.23 8.37 6.88 6.11

MAR 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00

Onroad 18.08 13.29 6.99 4.02

TOTAL 27.31 25.64 16.92 13.30 12.34

Table 15 Madison County VOC Emi ssion Inventory Totals for Base Year 2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012 and 2020 (tons per day)

Sector 2002 Base 2006

Attainment 2012

Interim 2020

Maintenance Safety Margin

EGU

Point n/a n/a n/a n/a

NonEGU 0.00 0.13 0.15 0.19

Nonroad 1.06 1.39 0.98 0.98

Other 4.65 2.98 2.61 2.49

MAR 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02

On-road 5.57 3.80 2.35 1.37

TOTAL 11.31 8.33 6.12 5.05 3.28

Table 16 Columbus Area VOC Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012 and 2020 (tons

per day)21 

### VOC 2002

Base 2006

Attainment 2012

Interim 2020

Maintenance Safety Margin

Delaware 23.07 21.72 15.54 12.68

Fairfield 13.07 14.26 10.45 8.55

Franklin 208.48 184.08 118.34 84.61

Knox 7.05 6.55 5.02 4.40
Licking 27.31 25.64 16.92 13.30

Madison 11.31 8.33 6.12 5.05

COMBINED VOC

TOTAL 290.29 260.58 172.39 128.59 131.99

NOx

Table 17 Delaware County NO

x 

### Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012 and 2020 (tons per day)

Sector 2002 Base 2006

Attainment 2012

Interim 2020

Maintenance Safety Margin

EGU

Point n/a n/a n/a n/a

Non-EGU 0.02 0.05 0.04 0.05

Non-road 2.53 5.84 4.19 1.99

Other 0.63 1.24 1.25 1.26

MAR 3.01 2.17 1.84 1.32

On-road 24.62 21.07 14.63 8.49

TOTAL 30.81 30.37 21.95 13.11 17.26

Table 18 Fairfield County NO

x 

### Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012 and 2020 (tons per day)

Sector 2002 Base 2006

Attainment 2012

Interim 2020

Maintenance Safety Margin

EGU Point n/a n/a n/a n/a

Non-EGU 5.37 4.38 4.13 4.17

Non-road 2.14 3.82 2.75 1.30

Other 0.39 0.90 0.91 0.92

MAR 0.28 0.25 0.22 0.18

On-road 13.03 12.68 8.12 4.65

TOTAL 21.21 22.03 16.13 11.22 10.81

Table 19 Franklin County NO

x 

### Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012 and 2020 (tons per day)22 

### Sector 2002 Base 2006

Attainment 2012

Interim 2020

Maintenance Safety Margin

EGU

Point n/a n/a n/a n/a

NonEGU 2.43 2.13 2.06 2.21

Nonroad 18.54 22.30 15.50 7.03

Other 4.47 10.69 10.82 10.87

MAR 6.47 4.73 4.23 3.46

Onroad 224.34 194.95 118.11 59.96

TOTAL 256.25 234.80 150.72 83.53 151.27

Table 20 Knox County NO

x 

### Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012 and 2020 (tons per day)

Sector 2002

Base 2006

Attainment 2012

Interim 2020

Maintenance Safety Margin

EGU Point n/a n/a n/a n/a

Non-EGU 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.04

Non-road 1.37 1.99 1.45 0.74

Other 0.35 0.60 0.61 0.62

MAR 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00

On-road 4.46 3.94 2.55 1.44

TOTAL 6.74 6.57 4.65 2.84 3.73

Table 21 Licking County NO

x 

### Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012 and 2020 (tons per day)

Sector 2002 Base 2006

Attainment 2012

Interim 2020

Maintenance Safety Margin

EGU n/a n/a n/a n/a23 

### Point

Non-EGU 1.72 2.69 2.90 3.27

Non-road 2.64 3.68 2.64 1.29

Other 0.77 1.59 1.60 1.61

MAR 1.90 0.09 0.10 0.10

On-road 32.13 25.92 15.34 8.56

TOTAL 39.16 33.97 22.58 14.83 19.14

Table 22 Madison County NO

x 

### Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012 and 2020 (tons per day)

Sector 2002

Base 2006

Attainment 2012

Interim 2020

Maintenance Safety Margin

EGU Point n/a n/a n/a n/a

Non-EGU 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01

Non-road 1.83 2.40 1.84 1.05

Other 0.23 0.41 0.42 0.42

MAR 0.63 0.43 0.37 0.28

On-road 11.24 8.47 5.47 3.09

TOTAL 2.69 3.25 2.64 1.76 1.49

Table 23 Columbus Area NO

x 

### Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012 and 2020 (tons per day)

NO
x 

### 2002

Base 2006

Attainment 2012

Interim 2020

Maintenance Safety Margin

Delaware 30.81 30.37 21.95 13.11

Fairfield 21.21 22.03 16.13 11.22

Franklin 256.25 234.80 150.72 83.53

Knox 6.74 6.57 4.65 2.84
Licking 39.16 33.97 22.58 14.83

Madison 2.69 3.25 2.64 1.76

COMBINED NO

x 

### TOTAL 356.86 330.99 218.67 127.29 203.70

VOC and NOx

Table 24 Columbus Area Comparison of 2006 attainment year and 2020 projected emission estimates (tons per day, summer)

2006 2020 Projected24 

### Decrease

VOC 260.58 128.59 131.99

NO
x 

### 330.99 127.29 203.70

As shown in the table above, VOC emissions in the nonattainment area are projected to decrease by 131.99tons/day. Point sources show a slight increase due to expectations that t he population will grow in this area; however, cleaner vehicles and fuels are expected to be in place in 2009 and 2018 and they cause an overall drop in VOC emissions.

NO

x 

### emissions in the nonattainment ar ea are projected to decrease by 203.70tons/day. Again, area source emi ssions and, to a lesser extent, point sources show a slight increase due to expectations that the population will grow in this area. Decreases from U.S. EPA rules covering Tier 2 Motor

Vehicle Emissions Standards and Gaso line Sulfur Control Requirements 4



### , Highway Heavy-Duty Engine Rule 5 

### , Non-Road Diesel Engine Rule 6 

### , and the

Clean Air Interstate Rule 7 

### are factored into the changes.

As identified in Table 9 above, an additional 15 percent margin of safety is being requested for mobile emissions. The additional 15 percent translates into an additional 6.57 tons/day for VOC and 12. 93 tons/day for NOx for 2020. U.S. EPA’s conformity regulations allow for allocation, through a revision to the SIP, all or some portion of the overall area’s safety margin (emission reductions from 2006 to 2020) to the mobile emissions budgets for future conformity. Ohio chose to allocate 6.57 tpd of the 131.99tpd safety margin for VOC and 12.93 tpd of the 203.70tpd safety margin for NOx as a mobile emissions budget 15% safety margin.

Requirement 4 of 5 A demonstration that improvement in air quality between the year violations occurred and the year attainment was achieved is based on permanent and enforceable emission reductions and not on temporary adverse econom ic conditions or unusually favorable meteorology.

Background Ambient air quality data from all monitoring sites indicate that air quality met

the NAAQS for ozone in 2006-2008. U. S. EPA’s redesignation guidance (p 9) states: “A state may generally demons trate maintenance of the NAAQS by either showing that future emissions of a pollutant or its precursors will not

exceed the level of the attainment invent ory, or by modeling to show that the

4 http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR /2000/February/Day-10/a19a.htm

5 http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-A IR/1997/October/Day-21/a27494.htm

6 http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR /1998/October/Day-23/a24836.htm

7 http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-A IR/2005/May/Day-12/a5723a.pdf25 

### future mix of sources and emissions ra tes will not cause a violation of the

NAAQS.”

Demonstration

Permanent and enforceable reductions of VOC and NOx emissions have

contributed to the attainment of t he eight-hour ozone st andard. Some of these reductions were due to the applicat ion of tighter feder al standards on
new vehicles. Also, Titl e IV of the CAA and the NO

x 

### SIP Call required the

reduction of NOx emissions from utility sources.

Table 25 Columbus Area Combined Comparison of 2002 base year and 2006 attainment year on-road and EGU reductions

All On-Road Data source: MORPC Transportation and Modeling Department

All Other Data source: Midwest Regional Pl anning Organization (MRPO) and Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO) Web site (Base M): http://www.ladco.org/tech/emis/



### 2002 2006

On-road VOC 189.64 147.47

On-road NO

x 

### 309.82 267.03

EGU NO

x 

### n/a n/a

Requirement 5 of 5 Provisions for future annual updates of the in ventory to enable tracking of the emission levels, including an annual emission st atement from major sources.

Demonstration In Ohio, major point sources in all counties are required to submit air emissions information annually, in acco rdance with U.S. EPA’s Consolidated Emissions Reporting Rule (CERR). Ohio EPA prepares a new periodic inventory for all ozone precursor emissi on sectors every three (3) years. These ozone precursor inventories will be prepared for future years as necessary to comply with the inventor y reporting requirements established in

the CFR. Emissions information will be compared to the 20 02 base year and the 2020 projected maintenance year inv entories to assess emission trends, as necessary, and to assure conti nued compliance with the ozone standard.26 

## CHAPTER FIVE

CONTROL MEASURES AND REGULATIONS CAA Section107 d)(3)(E)(ii), 107(d)(3)(iv) & 107(d)(3)(E)(v)

Requirement 1 of 5 Section 182(a) of t he 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments requires states with marginal nonattainment areas to implem ent RACT under Section 172(b).

Background Section 182(b) of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments requires states with

moderate nonattainment areas to submit a SIP to correct, or add, RACT requirements under Section 172(b) (as in effect immediately before the enactment of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990).

Demonstration As required under the 1-hour ozone standard, Ohio EPA submitted VOC RACT rules which U.S. EPA approv ed on April 25, 1996 (61 FR 18255), September 7, 1994 (59 FR 46182), and Oc tober 23, 1995 (60 FR 54308).

Statewide RACT rules have been applied to all new sources locating in Ohio since that time. RACT requirements ar e incorporated into permits along with monitoring, recordkeeping, and repor ting necessary to ensure ongoing compliance. Ohio EPA also has an ac tive enforcement program to address violations discovered by field office st aff. The Ohio RACT rules are found in OAC Chapter 3745-21 8



### .

Requirement 2 of 5 Section 182(a)(3)(B) requires states to submit emissions statements.

Background Section 182(a)(3)(B) requires states to submit emissions statements within two years of the enactment of the Clean Air Act Amendments and then every three years thereafter.

Demonstration

Ohio EPA submitted its emissions st atement SIP on Ma rch 18, 1994 which was approved by U.S. EPA on October 13, 1995 (59 FR 51863). As discussed in Chapter 4 (requirement 4) , Ohio EPA submits, and commits to submit, emission inventories (sta tements) every three years.

Requirement 3 of 5 Evidence that control measures required in past ozone SIP revisions have been fully implemented.

8 http://www.epa.state.oh.us/dapc/regs/3745-21/3745_21.html27 

### Background

In addition to the historic RACT requirements and those mentioned above,

the U.S. EPA NO

x 

### SIP Call required 22 states to pass rules that would result in significant emission reductions from large EGUs, industrial boilers, and

cement kilns in the easte rn United States. Ohio passed this rule in 2001. NOx SIP Call requirements are inco rporated into permits along with monitoring, recordkeeping, and repor ting necessary to ensure ongoing compliance. Ohio EPA also has an ac tive enforcement program to address violations discovered by field office st aff. Compliance is tracked through the Clean Air Markets data monitoring progr am. Beginning in 2004, this rule accounts for a reduction of approx imately 31 percent of all NO

x 

### emissions statewide compared to previous uncontroll ed years. The other 21 states also have adopted these rules.

On March 10, 2004, the U.S. EPA prom ulgated the CAIR. Beginning in 2009, U.S. EPA’s CAIR rule requires EGUs in 28 eastern states and the District of Columbia to significantly reduce emissions of NOx. CAIR will replace the NOx SIP Call for EGUs. National NO

x 

### emissions will be cut from 4.5 million tons in 2004, to a cap of 1.5 million tons by 2009, and 1.3 million

tons in 2018 in 28 states. States were required to submit a CAIR SIP as part

of this effort. Ohio submitted a CAIR SIP which was approved by U.S. EPA on February 1, 2007. U.S. EPA projects that in 2009 emissions of NOx will

decrease from a baseline of 264,000 tons per year to 91,000 tons per year

within Ohio 9



### .

Demonstration U.S. EPA and Ohio EPA performed modeling that indicated this area would attain the eight-hour ozone standard with the implement ation of the NO

x 

### SIP Call. Controls for EGUs formally commenced May 31, 2004. Emissions covered by this program have been gener ally trending downward since 1998 with larger reductions occurring in 2002 and 2003. Data taken from the U.S. EPA Clean Air Markets web site, quantify the gradual NO

x 

### reductions that

have occurred in Ohio as a result of Title IV of the 1990 CAA Amendments and the beginning of the NO

x 

### SIP Call Rule. Ohio developed the NO

x 

### Budget Trading Program rules in OAC Chapter 3745-14 10 

### in response to the SIP Call. OAC Chapter 3745-14 regulates EGUs and cert ain non-EGUs under a cap and trade program based on an 85 percent reduction of NOx emissions from EGUs and a 60 per cent reduction of NO

x 

### emissions from non-EGUs, compared to historical levels. This cap will stay in place through 2008, at which time the CAIR program will supersede it as discussed above.

9 http://www.epa.gov/cair/pdfs/0053-2228.pdf

10 http://www.epa.state.oh.us/dapc/regs/3745-14/3745_14.html28 

### On April 21, 2004, U.S. EPA published Phase II of the NO x 

### SIP Call that establishes a budget for large (great er than 1 ton per day emissions) stationary internal combustion engi nes. Ohio EPA’s OAC rule 3745-14-12 addresses stationary internal combus tion engines, all used in natural gas pipeline transmissions. U.S. EPA approved th is revision to the SIP on April 4, 2008. An 82 percent NO x 

### reduction from 1995 leve ls is anticipated. Completion of the compliance pl an occurred by May 1, 2006 and the compliance demonstration began May 1, 2007. The 2007 controlled NO x 

### emissions is 599 tons statewide for the ozone season.

Tier II Emission Standards for Vehicles and Gasoline Sulfur Standards In February 2000, U.S. EPA finalized a federal rule to significantly reduce emissions from cars and light trucks, in cluding sport utility vehicles (SUVs). Under this proposal, automakers will be required to sell cleaner cars, and refineries will be required to make cleaner, lower sulfur gasoline. This rule will apply nationwide. The federal rules will phase in between 2004 and

2009. U.S. EPA has estimated that NO

x 

### emission reductions will be approximately 77 percent for passenger cars, 86 percent for smaller SUVs, light trucks, and minivans, and 65 to 95 percent reductions for larger SUVs, vans, and heavier trucks. VOC emissi on reductions will be approximately 12 percent for passenger cars, 18 percent for smaller SUVs, light trucks, and minivans, and 15 percent for larger SUVs, vans, and heavier trucks.

Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines In July 2000, U.S. EPA issu ed a final rule for Highway Heavy Duty Engines, a program which includes low-sulfur di esel fuel standards, which will be phased in from 2004 through 2007. This rule applies to heavy-duty gasoline and

diesel trucks and buses. This rule will result in a 40 percent reduction in NO

x 

### from diesel trucks and buses, a large sector of the mobile sources NO

x 

### inventory.

Clean Air Non-road Diesel Rule In May 2004, U.S. EPA issued the Clean Air Non-road Diesel Rule. This rule applies to diesel engines used in industrie s such as construction, agriculture, and mining. It also contains a cleaner fuel standard similar to the highway diesel program. The new standards will cut emissions from non-road diesel engines by more than 90 percent. N on-road diesel equipment, as described in this rule, currently accounts for 47 per cent of diesel particulate matter (PM) and 25 percent of NO

x 

### from mobile sources nation wide. Sulfur levels will be reduced in non-road diesel fuel by 99 percent from current levels, from approximately 3,000 parts per million ( ppm) now to 15 ppm in 2009. New engine standards take effect, based on engine horsepower, starting in 2008. Together, these rules will substantially reduce local and regional sources of

ozone precursors.29 

### Requirement 4 of 5 Acceptable provisions to provide for new source review.

Background Ohio has a long standing and fully impl emented New Source Review (NSR) program. This is addressed in OAC Chapter 3745-31 11 

### . The Chapter includes provisions for the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permitting program in OAC rules 3745- 31-01 to 3745-31-20. Ohio's PSD program was conditionally approved on Oc tober 10, 2001 (66 FR 51570) and received final approval on January 22, 2003 (68FR 2909) by U.S. EPA as part of the SIP.

Demonstration Any facility that is not lis ted in the 2002 emission invent ory, or for the closing

of which credit was taken in demonstrat ing attainment, will not be allowed to construct, reopen, modify, or reconstr uct without meeting all applicable NSR requirements. Once the area is r edesignated, Ohio EPA will implement NSR through the PSD program.

Requirement 5 of 5 Assure that all existing control measures will re main in effect after redesignation unless the State demonstrates through phot ochemical modeling that t he standard can be maintained without one (1) or more control measures.

Demonstration Ohio commits to maintaining the af orementioned control measures after redesignation. Ohio hereby commits that any changes to its rules or emission limits applicabl e to VOC and/or NO

x 

### sources, as required for

maintenance of the ozone standard in t he Columbus area, will be submitted to U.S. EPA for approval as a SIP revision.

Ohio, through Ohio EPA’s Legal secti on, has the legal authority and necessary resources to actively enforce any violations of its rules or permit provisions. After redesignation, it int ends to continue enforcing all rules that relate to the emission of ozone pr ecursors in the Columbus area.

11 http://www.epa.state.oh.us/dapc/regs/3745-31/3745_31.html30 

## CHAPTER SIX

CONTINGENCY MEASURES CAA Section 107(d)(3)(E)(v)

Requirement 1 of 4 A commitment to submit a revised plan eight (8) years after redesignation.

Demonstration Ohio hereby commits to review its maintenance plan eight (8) years after redesignation, as required by Section 175(A) of the CAA

.

Requirement 2 of 4 A commitment to expeditiously enact and im plement additional contingency control measures in response to exceeding specified pr edetermined levels (triggers) or in the event

that future violations of the ambient standard occurs.

Demonstration Ohio hereby commits to adopt and ex peditiously implement necessary corrective actions in the following circumstances:

Warning Level Response:

A warning level response shall be prompted whenever an annual (1-year) fourth high monitored va lue of 88 ppb occurs in a single ozone season within the maintenance area. A warning level response will consist of a study to

determine whether the ozone value indi cates a trend toward higher ozone values or whether emissions appear to be increasing. The study will evaluate whether the trend, if any, is likely to continue and, if so, t he control measures necessary to reverse the trend taking in to consideration ease and timing for implementation as well as econom ic and social considerations. Implementation of necessary controls in response to a warning level response trigger will take place as expedi tiously as possible, but in no event

later than 12 months from the conclusion of the most recent ozone season (September 30).

Should it be determined through the warn ing level study that action is necessary to reverse the noted trend, the procedures for control selection and implementation outlined under action level response shall be followed.

Action Level Response:

An action level response shall be pr ompted whenever a two-year average fourth high monitored value of 85 parts per billion (ppb) or greater occurs

within the maintenance area. A violati on of the standard (three-year average fourth high value of 85 ppb or greater) shall also prompt an action level31 

### response. In the event that the action level is triggered and is not found to be due to an exceptional event, malfuncti on, or noncompliance with a permit condition or rule requirement, Ohio EPA in conjunction wit h the metropolitan planning organization or regional counc il of governments, will determine

additional control measures needed to a ssure future attainment of the NAAQS for ozone. In this case, meas ures that can be implemented in a

short time will be selected in order to be in place within 18 months from the

close of the ozone season t hat prompted the action leve l. Ohio EPA will also consider the timing of an action leve l trigger and determine if additional, significant new regulations not current ly included as part of the maintenance provisions will be implement ed in a timely manner and will constitute our

response.

Control Measure Sele ction and Implementation

Adoption of any additional control meas ures is subject to the necessary administrative and legal process. This process will include publication of notices, an opportunity for public heari ng, and other measures required by Ohio law for rulemaking.

If a new measure/control is already promulgated and scheduled to be implemented at the federal or State level, and t hat measure/control is

determined to be sufficient to address the upward trend in air quality, additional local measures may be unnec essary. Furthermore, Ohio will submit to U.S. EPA an analysis to dem onstrate the proposed measures are adequate to return the area to attainment.

Requirement 3 of 4 A list of potential contingency measures t hat would be implemented in such an event.

Demonstration Contingency measures to be c onsidered will be selected from a comprehensive list of measures deemed appr opriate and effective at the time

the selection is made. The select ion of measures will be based on costeffectiveness, emission reduction potential, economic and social

considerations or other factors that Ohio EPA deems appropriate. Ohio EPA will solicit input from all interested and affected persons in the maintenance area prior to selecting appropriate cont ingency measures. Because it is not possible at this time to determine what control measure will be appropriate at an unspecified time in the future, the list of contingency measures outlined

below is not exhaustive.

1) Lower Reid vapor pressure gasoline program.

2) Adopt VOC RACT on existing sour ces covered by U.S. EPA Control Technique Guidelines issued after the 1990 CAA.32 

### 3) Apply VOC RACT to smaller existing sources.

4) One or more transportation control measures sufficient to achieve at least half a percent reduction in actual areawide VOC emissions. Transportation measures will be sele cted from the following, based upon the factors listed above after consultation with affected local
governments:

a) trip reduction programs, including, but not limited to, employerbased transportation management plans, areawide rideshare programs, work schedule changes, and telecommuting;

b) traffic flow and transit improvements; and

c) other new or innovative trans portation measures not yet in widespread use that affect s local governments deemed appropriate.

5) Alternative fuel and diesel re trofit programs for fleet vehicle operations.

6) High volume, low pressure coat ing application requirements for autobody facilities.

7) Requirements for cold cleaner degreaser operations (low vapor pressure solvents).

8) Require VOC or NO

x 

### emission offsets for new and modified major

sources.

9) Require VOC or NO

x 

### emission offsets for new and modified minor

sources.

10) Increase the ratio of emission offsets required for new sources.

11) Require VOC or NO

x 

### controls on new minor sources (less than 100 tons).

12) Adopt NOx RACT for existing combustion sources.

No contingency measure shall be implemented without providing the opportunity for full public participation during which the relative costs and benefits of individual measures, at the ti me they are under consideration, can be fully evaluated.33 

### Requirement 4 of 4

A list of VOC and NO

x 

### sources potentially subject to future additional control requirements.

Demonstration The following is a list of VOC and NO

x 

### sources potentially subject to future

controls.

NO

x 

### RACT

• EGUs

• asphalt batching plants

• industrial/commercial and institutional boilers

• process heaters

• internal combustion engines

• combustion turbines

• other sources greater than 100 tons per year

VOC RACT

• automobile refinishing shops

• cold cleaner degreasers

• synthetic organic compound manufacturing

• organic compound batch processes

• wood manufacturing

• industrial wastewater

• aerospace industry

• bakeries

• plastic parts coating

• volatile organic liquid storage

• industrial solvent cleaning

• offset lithography

• industrial surface coating

• other sources greater than 50 tons per year34 

## CHAPTER SEVEN

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

Ohio published notification for a public hear ing and solicitation for public comment concerning the draft redesignation petition and maintenance plan in the widely distributed county publications.

The public hearing to receive comments on the redesignation request was held on December 4, 2012 at the Ohio EPA Central Office located at 50 West Town Street, Suite 700, Columbus, Ohio. The public comment period closed on December 4, 2012. Comments received during the public comm ent period have been included in the final package. Appendix E includes a copy of the public notice and respons e to comments from the public hearing and comment period.35 

## CHAPTER EIGHT

CONCLUSIONS

The Columbus ozone nonattainment area has attained the 1997 NAAQS for ozone and complied with the applicable provisions of the 1990 Amendments to the CAA regarding redesignations of ozone nonattainment areas. Do cumentation to that effect is contained herein. Ohio EPA has prepared a redesignati on request and maintenance plan that meet the requirements of Section 110 (a)(1) of the 1990 CAA.

Based on this presentati on, the Columbus ozone nona ttainment area meets the requirements for redesignation under the CAA and U.S. EPA guidance. Ohio has performed an analysis that shows the air qualit y improvements are du e to permanent and enforceable measures. Furthermore, because this area is subject to sign ificant transport of pollutants, significant regional NO

x 

### reductions will ensure continued compliance (maintenance) with the standard with an increasing margin of safety.

The State of Ohio hereby requests that the Columbus ozone nonattainment area be redesignated to attainment simultaneously with U.S. EPA approval of the maintenance plan provisions contained herein. In addition, the State of Ohio requests that this maintenance plan satisfy the requirements of CAA Sect ion 175A (b), for subsequent plan revisions required for areas redesignated for the one-hour ozone standard, as was the case with the

Columbus ozone nonattainment area.

### This page left intentionally blank

# C ENTRAL 

# O HIO 

# O N 

# -R OAD 

# M OBILE 

# E MISSION 

# E STIMATES


# P REPARED FOR 

# O HIO 

# E NVIRONMENTAL 

# P ROTECTION 

# A GENCY


# C ENTRAL 

# O HIO 

# SIP I NVENTORY FOR THE


# 8-H OUR 

# O ZONE 

# S TANDARD

S EPTEMBER


### , 2012

Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission

111 Liberty Street
Columbus, Ohio 43215

614-228-2663

www.morpc.orgCentral Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................... 1

1.1 I NTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................... 1

1.2 B ACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................................................... 1

1.3 G EOGRAPHIC A REA OF A NALYSIS ......................................................................................................................... 2

2.0 QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS ......................................................................................................................... 3

2.1 A NALYSIS Y EARS .................................................................................................................................................. 3

2.2 G ENERAL M ETHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................................... 3

2.3 T RAVEL D EMAND M ODEL ..................................................................................................................................... 4

2.3.1 I NDEPENDENT V ARIABLES ................................................................................................................................... 4

2.3.2 M ODEL N ETWORKS .............................................................................................................................................. 5

2.3.3 L OADED H IGHWAY N ETWORKS ........................................................................................................................... 8

2.3.4 I NTRA Z ONAL T RIPS .............................................................................................................................................. 8

2.4 E MISSION F ACTOR G ENERATION ........................................................................................................................... 8

2.4.1 V EHICLE A GE D ISTRIBUTION ............................................................................................................................. 23

2.4.2 T EMPERATURES ................................................................................................................................................. 23

2.5 C OMPUTATIONS M ETHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................ 23

2.5.1 A REAS WITH R EGIONAL M ODEL ........................................................................................................................ 23

2.5.2 A REAS WITHOUT R EGIONAL M ODEL .................................................................................................................. 24

3.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS ............................................................................................................................ 26

3.1.1 A REAS WITHIN T HE R EGIONAL T RAVEL D EMAND M ODEL ................................................................................ 26

3.1.2 A REAS PARTIALLY WITHIN T HE R EGIONAL T RAVEL D EMAND M ODEL .............................................................. 26

3.1.3 A REA OUTSIDE R EGIONAL T RAVEL D EMAND M ODEL ........................................................................................ 28

3.1.4 T OTAL E MISSIONS FOR THE C OLUMBUS /C ENTRAL O HIO AREA .......................................................................... 28

3.2 E MISSIONS S UMMARY FOR THE C OLUMBUS /C ENTRAL O HIO A REA .................................................................... 29

APPENDIX ................................................................................................................................................................ 30

LIST OF TABLES

T ABLE 1

– MOVES I NPUTS ............................................................................................................................................ 9

T ABLE 2

– T EMPERATURE AND R ELATIVE H UMIDITY D ATA ........................................................................................ 11

T ABLE 3

– R AMP F RACTIONS ....................................................................................................................................... 11

T ABLE 4

– S OURCE T YPE P OPULATION FOR YEAR 2006 ............................................................................................... 12

T ABLE 5

– V EHICLE A GE D ISTRIBUTION ...................................................................................................................... 13

T ABLE 6

– R OAD T YPE D ISTRIBUTION .......................................................................................................................... 17

T ABLE 7

– Y EARLY HPMS VMT FOR 2006.................................................................................................................. 18

T ABLE 8

– H OURLY VMT F RACTIONS .......................................................................................................................... 18

T ABLE 9

– S AMPLE E MISSION F ILE (R ATE PER D ISTANCE ) FOR YEAR 2006 .................................................................. 22

T ABLE 10

– S AMPLE E MISSION F ILE (R ATE PER V EHICLE ) FOR YEAR 2006 .................................................................. 22

T ABLE 11: E MISSION E STIMATIONS FOR O N -R OAD M OBILE S OURCES

- F RANKLIN C OUNTY ...................................... 26

T ABLE 12: E MISSION E STIMATIONS FOR O N -R OAD M OBILE S OURCES

- D ELAWARE C OUNTY .................................... 26

T ABLE 13: E MISSION E STIMATIONS FOR O N -R OAD M OBILE S OURCES

- L ICKING C OUNTY ......................................... 26

T ABLE 14 A : E MISSION E STIMATIONS FOR F AIRFIELD C OUNTY WITHIN THE T RAVEL D EMAND M ODEL A REA ............ 26

T ABLE 14 B : E MISSION E STIMATIONS FOR F AIRFIELD C OUNTY OUTSIDE OF THE T RAVEL D EMAND M ODEL A REA

USING HPMS DATA ............................................................................................................................................. 27

T ABLE 14 C : E MISSION E STIMATIONS FOR F AIRFIELD C OUNTY .................................................................................... 27

T ABLE 15 A : E MISSION E STIMATIONS FOR M ADISON C OUNTY WITHIN THE T RAVEL D EMAND M ODEL A REA ............. 27

T ABLE 15 B : E MISSION E STIMATIONS FOR M ADISON C OUNTY OUTSIDE OF THE T RAVEL D EMAND M ODEL A REA

-

USING HPMS DATA ............................................................................................................................................. 27

T ABLE 15 C : E MISSION E STIMATIONS FOR M ADISON C OUNTY ..................................................................................... 28

T ABLE 16: E MISSION E STIMATIONS FOR K NOX C OUNTY

– USING ONLY HPMS .......................................................... 28

T ABLE 17: E MISSION E STIMATIONS FOR O N -R OAD M OBILE S OURCES FOR C OLUMBUS /C ENTRAL O HIO .................... 28

T ABLE 18: VOC E MISSION I NVENTORY S UMMARY ..................................................................................................... 29

T ABLE 19: NO X E MISSION I NVENTORY S UMMARY ..................................................................................................... 29C

e ntral Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 iii LIST OF FIGURES

F IGURE 1: C OLUMBUS

, C ENTRAL O HIO

, 8-H OUR MARGINAL N ON

- ATTAINMENT A REA ......................................... 2

F IGURE 2: P OPULATION G ROWTH

– MORPC/LCATS M ODEL A REA ................................................................... 6

F IGURE 3: E MPLOYMENT G ROWTH

– MORPC/LCATS M ODEL A REA ................................................................. 6

F IGURE 4: V EHICLE T RIPS ( PER D AY ) GROWTH

– MORPC/LCATS M ODEL A REA .............................................. 7

F IGURE 5: VMT (V EHICLE M ILES OF T RAVEL ) GROWTH

– MORPC/LCATS M ODEL A REA ............................... 7Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 1 

## 1.0 Introduction & Background

1.1 Introduction

This Report documents the on-road mobile emission estimates for the Columbus and Central Ohio area, in conjunction with the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA) State Implementation Plan (SIP) update for Central Ohio area, primarily to update the emission budgets to MOVES based values. This report presents the summary of on road mobile emissions for the analysis years of 2002, 2006, 2012, 2020 & 2035 of VOC (volatile organic compounds, gaseous compounds made of carbon and hydrogen) and NOx (Oxides of Nitrogen). VOC and NOx interacting with sunlight in the lower atmosphere develops the primary constituent of smog, Ozone, a criteria pollutant. These emissions documented here are the emissions due to on-road vehicles for the counties in the marginal nonattainment area of Central Ohio. The methodologies in computing emissions and forecasting models used are also summarized in this report.



### 1.2 Background

Under the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA), because of the 1997 eight-hour ozone standard, on April 15, 2004, U.S. EPA issued final designations with regard to the 8-hour ozone standard, designating the central Ohio basic non-attainment area to be the six counties of Franklin, Delaware, Licking, Madison, Fairfield and Knox counties were designated as a basic nonattainment area for ozone. The CAAA defines nonattainment areas as geographic regions of the country that do not meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). In nonattainment areas, air quality implementation plans must be developed that identify strategies and programs that nonattainment areas will implement to provide the emission reductions needed for the areas to meet the NAAQS. In Ohio, OEPA is the lead agency for coordinating development of the SIP. The SIP includes actions done on a statewide basis as well as actions done within each specific nonattainment area of the state to achieve the air quality standards.

Re-designation of an area from ‘eight-hour ozone basic non-attainment’ to attainment is based on criteria and guidance set forth by U.S. EPA. Re-designation requests to attainment include SIP revisions that document that the NAAQS have been met and provide a maintenance plan to ensure meeting the standards for the next ten years. One of the items of documentation contained in a re-designation request is three consecutive years of air quality monitoring data that meet the NAAQS. A Re-designation request to attainment was submitted to EPA in March 2009. This re-designation request to attainment was approved on September 15, 2009, based on 1997 eight-hour ozone standard, which is 80 ppb (0.08 ppm).

In September 2009, Central Ohio area reached attainment, by re-designation, based on 1997 eight-hour ozone standard. However on May 21, 2012 US EPA’s Federal Register noticedesignated Columbus Central Ohio area as marginal nonattainment area for the 2008 eighthour ozone standard. Thus SIP update is required to establish new budgets for Ozone. Also incorporating MOVES program, in lieu of previously used MOBILE 6 program, as required by USEPA. This report updates ozone emissions inventory using MOVES software program.Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 2 

### 1.3 Geographic Area of Analysis

The six-county marginal non-attainment areas consist of two metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs), MORPC and LCATS and also areas outside of the two MPO’s in Fairfield, Madison, and Knox Counties, illustrated in Figure 1. The MORPC transportation planning area consists of Franklin County, Delaware County, Pataskala and Etna Township in Licking County, and Violet and Bloom Townships in Fairfield County. The LCATS transportation planning area covers the remainder of Licking County. The travel demand model area comprising MORPC and LCATS transportation planning areas is illustrated in Figure 1. Donut areas, referring to Figure 1, are the counties or portions of counties that are outside of the travel demand model area. As illustrated, these are portions of Fairfield and Madison counties and all of Knox county. On-road mobile emissions analysis methodologies for counties within the travel
demand area, as well as for counties outside the model area are discussed in the next sections. The geographic area of re-designation request for the Columbus, Central Ohio area, comprises of six-counties: Franklin county, Delaware county, Licking county, Fairfield county, Madison county, and Knox county.

F IGURE 1: C OLUMBUS

, C ENTRAL O HIO

, 8-H OUR MARGINAL N ON

- ATTAINMENT A REACentral Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 3 

## 2.0 QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS

The methodologies used and background information for estimating on-road mobile emissions are discussed in the foregoing sections for the geographic area of 8-hour ozone non-attainment

area.



### 2.1 Analysis Years

Year 2002 is the base year of analysis. 2006 is an attainment year, being one of the three clean air quality data monitoring years, of 2006, 2007 & 2008, showing attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. Years 2012 is an interim year analysis year, and 2020 is final maintenance budget year. The Transportation Plan horizon year for MORPC and LCATS is 2035. 2035 is provided to determine the longer term emissions trend. Thus, the years 2002, 2006, 2012, 2020

and 2035 was used for these on-road mobile emissions estimates.



### 2.2 General Methodology

Evaluating emissions for current as well as future years requires several data inputs, discussed in the foregoing sections. Among these, vehicle travel characteristics data can be obtained from regionally maintained travel demand model. Travel demand model provides daily traffic volumes, congested travel times, speeds, v/c (volume to capacity ratios), VMT (vehicle miles traveled), VHT (vehicle hours traveled) among other input travel characteristics data used in evaluating emissions in this report. Areas that are not within the regional travel demand model boundary utilized HPMS (Highway Performance Monitoring Systems) based travel characteristics data. Thus, the travel demand model is used in evaluating emissions for Franklin county, Delaware county, and Licking county. Both the travel demand model as well as HPMS is used in evaluating emissions for Fairfield county and Madison county. HPMS only is used for the Knox county, in evaluating emissions. Each of the aforementioned process is

detailed further in sections 2.5.1 and 2.5.2.Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 4 

### 2.3 Travel Demand Model

For these analyses the latest planning assumptions available for the Central Ohio area were used. For the travel demand model, model validation is a joint process between MORPC, LCATS and the ODOT Office of Technical Services. In December 2004, a new complete validated model was accepted and installed for use at MORPC. The new model covers all of the MORPC and LCATS area including portions of Pickaway, Madison and Union Counties along with additional portions of Fairfield County outside of the MORPC MPO area. Further, MORPC continuously updates the highway and transit network information and maintains accurate networks for future year analysis. The new model used is a multi-step tour-based model, incorporating more advanced simulation methods than compared to traditional four step model. Thus model inputs were tested for quality control and quality assurance. Forecasted variables such as population, employment, traffic counts, roadway network, etc. were developed by MORPC in coordination with LCATS and used for the analysis.

Due to the advance simulation methods incorporated, there is some variation in model results from one complete model run to another with all of the same input data. MORPC performed a check on this variability with regard to on-road mobile emission estimates. The emission

estimates for several 2002 model runs were calculated. The variation in the emission estimates were less than one-tenth of one percent (0.1%). Thus it was determined that the variability due to the simulation is insignificant.

2.3.1 Independent Variables

Independent variables (land use/socio-economic data) were developed as well as interpolated for intermediate years of analysis. Trip tables for the analysis years 2002, 2006, 2012, 2020 and 2035 were developed. MORPC continually monitors land use, population and employment information. MORPC performs complete land use inventories every five years. The complete documentation of the process and future forecasts is provided in 2012-2035 Transportation Plans completed in May 2012 by MOPRC and LCATS.

Figure 2 illustrates population growth trends for the travel demand model area, indicating a growth in population of 1.5 million from year 2002 to 2.2 million in the year 2035, with population estimates of 1.59, 1.71, and 1.89 million in the years 2006, 2012, and 2020 respectively.

Figure 3 illustrates employment growth trends for the travel demand model area, indicating a growth in employment of 851,000 from year 2002 to 1,125,000 in year 2035, with employment of 901,000 in year 2006, an estimated employment of 850,000 in year 2012, and projected employment of 945,000 in the year 2020.Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 5 2.3.2 Model Networks

MORPC staff in conjunction with LCATS and ODOT continuously update the model networks to accurately reflect projects in the current TIP and Metropolitan Transportation Plan. The Transportation Plan horizon year for MORPC and LCATS is 2035. The model networks developed for this emission estimates were for the analysis years 2002, 2006, 2012, 2020 and

2035.

Figure 4 illustrates typical daily vehicle trips growth trends for the travel demand model area, indicating a growth of 4.4 million daily vehicle trips from year 2002 to 6.3 million daily vehicle trips in year 2035, with 4.7, 4.8, and 5.4 daily million vehicle trips in the years 2006, 2012, and 2020 respectively.

Figure 5 illustrates VMT (vehicle miles of travel) growth trends for the travel demand model area, indicating a growth of 45.0 million daily VMT from year 2002 to 70.9 million daily VMT in year 2035, with 49.8, 51.5, and 58.2 million daily VMT in the years 2006, 2012, and 2020 respectively.Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 6 F IGURE 2: P OPULATION G ROWTH

– MORPC/LCATS M ODEL A REA

F IGURE 3: E MPLOYMENT G ROWTH

– MORPC/LCATS M ODEL A REA

0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000Population

Analysis Year



### Population Growth of MORPC/LCATS Model Area

Franklin County

Delaware County

Licking County

Fairfield County (Model Area)

Madison County (Model Area)

Union County (Model Area)

Pickaway County (Model Area)

Total Population (Model Area)

0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000Employment

Analysis Year



### Employment Growth of MORPC/LCATS Model Area

Franklin County

Delaware County

Licking County

Fairfield County (Model Area)

Madison County (Model Area)

Union County (Model Area)

Pickaway County (Model Area)

Total Employment (Model Area)Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 7 F IGURE 4: V EHICLE T RIPS ( PER D AY ) GROWTH

– MORPC/LCATS M ODEL A REA

F IGURE 5: VMT (V EHICLE M ILES OF T RAVEL ) GROWTH

– MORPC/LCATS M ODEL A REA

0 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 7,000,000Vehicle Trips

Analysis Year 

### Daily Vehicle Trips Growth of MORPC/LCATS Model Area

Franklin County

Delaware County

Licking County

Fairfield County (Model Area)

Madison County (Model Area)

Union County (Model Area)

Pickaway County (Model Area)

Total Daily Trips (Model Area)

0 10,000,000 20,000,000 30,000,000 40,000,000 50,000,000 60,000,000 70,000,000 80,000,000VMT

Analysis Year



### VMT Growth of MORPC/LCATS Model Area

Franklin County

Delaware County

Licking County

Fairfield County (Model Area)

Madison County (Model Area)

Union County (Model Area)

Pickaway County (Model Area)

Total VMT (Model Area)Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 8 2.3.3 Loaded Highway Networks

Trip assignment was run for 2002 baseline, 2006, 2012, 2020 and 2035 using CUBE. The assignments produced a loaded highway network for each analysis year. These loaded network files includes total volume for each link in the network. Programming scripts in CUBE (a model software), illustrated in Appendix A, incorporate ODOT’s CMAQ process, discussed in more detail in Section 2.5.1. The loaded highway network for each year was split into separate files for each county. Each county network was run independently through the CMAQ process for each analysis year, which combined the volumes and emission factors for computing VOC and NOx emissions for the entire county.

2.3.4 IntraZonal Trips

Intrazonal trips are the trips that are generated within a traffic analysis zone (TAZ), that use local roads. Intrazonal trips do not get loaded onto the highway networks so Cube/Voyager emission calculation script requires a separate input file to account for these trips. Input files for evaluating intrazonal emissions are intrazonal trips file, intrazonal area file, and intrazonal emissions factor file. These input files for the areas within the travel demand model area are for Franklin county, Licking county, Delaware county, as well as for partial areas of Fairfield county and Madison county. The intrazonal trips were extracted from the trip tables using a Cube/Voyager script.



### 2.4 Emission Factor Generation

Base and Attainment Years

Using MOVES, emission factor files were generated for base year-2002 and attainment year2006 to represent the programs being implemented in the region. Programs and corresponding MOVES parameters were developed in consultation with OEPA.

Future Years

Emission factors were also generated for three future year scenarios: 2012, 2020, and 2035. All assumptions are the same as those used to generate 2006 emission factors and are further illustrated in this section using year 2006 as an example.

Technical Details

Table 1 summarizes the settings used in the MOVES run specification file and the MOVES County-Data Manager. Further details in specific inputs that are not using default values are provided below.Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 9 

### Table 1 – MOVES Inputs

RunSpec Parameter Settings

MOVES Version MOVES2010A

Scale Custom Domain
MOVES Modeling Technique 

### Emission Factor Method Rates per Profile (grams/vehicle) Rates per Distance (grams/mile) Rates per Vehicle (grams/vehicle)
Time Span Time Aggregation: Hour 1 Month representing average annual temperatures All hours of day selected 16 speed bins Weekdays only Geographic Bounds Franklin, Delaware, Licking, Fairfield, Madison & Knox

Counties. Vehicles/Equipment All source types, gasoline and diesel

Road Type All road types including off-network
Pollutants and Processes Total Gaseous Hydrocarbons, Non-Methane Hydrocarbons, Volitile Organic Compounds, NO

x , NO, NO 2, Total Energy Consumption Strategies None
General Output Units = grams, joules and miles
Output Emissions Time = hour, Location = custom area, on-road emission rates by road type and source use type.

Advance Performance None

County Data Manager Sources

Source Type Population Combination of local and default data Local data (2010) ODOT from motor vehicle registration Default data used for source types 41, 51, 54, 61, and 62 Future year growth rate based on MPO model Household growth rate. Vehicle Type VMT Combination of local and default data HPMSVTypeYear VMT = daily VMT from travel demand

model

monthVMTFraction = default dayVMTFraction=default

hourVMTFraction=local I/M Program None

Fuel Formulation Default
Fuel Supply Default Future runs modified for reformulated gas, RVP, etc. for summer analyses Metereology Data Local data obtained from NOAA National Climatic Data Center. Data consist of monthly high and low temperatures and daily relative humidity for 2002. Ramp Fraction Using the base year travel demand model for VHT fractions.

Future fractions assumed constantCentral Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 10 Road Type Distribution Use ODOT county summary VMT categorized by federal

functional classes Age Distribution Combination of local and default data. Local data (2010) ODOT from motor vehicle registration Default data used for source types 41, 51, 54, 61, and 62 The same age distribution used for all analysis years Average Speed Distribution Default

Alternative Fuel Type DefaultCentral Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 11 

### Temperature and Relative Humidity

Temperatures used for the single season approach are representative of 12 months in

2002 based on NOAA data from the National Climate Data Center website. Data for Port Columbus International Airport was used because it was the most complete compared to other airports in the non-attainment area. To get the correct format for MOVES, the data was entered into a spreadsheet provided by EPA which was designed to convert Mobile6 data to MOVES. An average annual hourly temperature and relative humidity distribution profile can be seen in Table 2.

Table 2 – Temperature and Relative Humidity Data

Hour Average

Temperature Average Relative Humidity

1 48.9 73.0

2 47.8 75.0

3 46.9 77.0

4 46.2 80.0

5 45.7 81.0

6 45.1 81.0

7 44.6 80.0

8 45.0 77.0

9 47.5 73.0

10 51.5 67.0

11 55.6 64.0

12 59.1 61.0

13 62.2 57.0

14 63.9 56.0

15 64.4 53.0

16 64.6 53.0

17 64.2 54.0

18 63.0 55.0

19 61.0 57.0

20 58.4 63.0

21 55.9 67.0

22 53.6 70.0

23 52.0 72.0

24 50.4 75.0



### Ramp Fraction Ramp fractions were derived using the base year travel demand model VHT fractions. Ramp fractions can be seen in Table 3. Base year fractions were assumed to apply to future years.

Table 3 – Ramp Fractions

RoadTypeID Road Description Ramp Fraction

2 Rural Restricted Access 0.02

4 Urban Restricted Access 0.13Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 12 

### Source Type Population Source type population is based on a combination of local and MOVES default data. Local data was provided by ODOT based on 2010 motor vehicle registration. Default data is used for source types 41, 51, 54, 61, and 62. Future year growth rate is based on MPO model growth in cars which is an independent variable to the travel demand model. Table 4 shows source type population for the analyzed counties in 2006.

Table 4 – Source Type Population for year 2006

Source Type ID sourceTypeName Franklin

Delaware Licking Fairfield Madison &

Knox

11 MotorCycle 55,222 6,868 8,999 2,444 3,565

21 Passenger Car 878,901 97,120 128,334 35,905 43,829

31 Passenger Truck 383,900 44,774 58,759 16,550 31,914

32 Light Commercial Truck 11,553 1,348 1,768 498 1,280

41 Intercity Bus 294 66 83 23 66

42 Transit Bus 79 18 22 6 35

43 School Bus 1,582 357 446 126 405

51 Refuse truck 228 39 49 13 37

52 Single Unit Short-haul Truck 205 35 44 12 1,553

53 Single Unit Long-haul Truck 264 44 57 15 198

54 Motor Home 1,102 184 235 65 181

61 Comb Short-haul Truck 3,144 653 905 154 780

62 Comb Long-haul Truck 3,616 750 1,040 178 897



### Vehicle Age Distribution Vehicle age distribution information was derived using Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicle registration data for year 2010. The data was given to OEPA who supplied a VIN decoder that allowed ODOT to create correctly formatted MOVES inputs. MOVES default data is used for source types 41, 51, 54, 61, and 62. The registration data for most populous four counties were obtained in the non-attainment area and combined to create a regional vehicle age distribution file, see Table 5. This data is applied to all six counties in the region. The same age distribution will be used for all analysis yearsCentral Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 13 

### Table 5 – Vehicle Age Distribution

Year

ID Source Type ID Age

ID Age

Fraction Source

Type ID Age

ID Age

Fraction Source

Type ID Age

ID Age

Fraction

2006 11 0 0.0017 21 8 0.0599 31 16 0.0300

2006 11 1 0.0228 21 9 0.0580 31 17 0.0256

2006 11 2 0.0552 21 10 0.0634 31 18 0.0157

2006 11 3 0.0765 21 11 0.0615 31 19 0.0118

2006 11 4 0.0864 21 12 0.0562 31 20 0.0084

2006 11 5 0.0820 21 13 0.0527 31 21 0.0077

2006 11 6 0.0664 21 14 0.0460 31 22 0.0062

2006 11 7 0.0839 21 15 0.0465 31 23 0.0048

2006 11 8 0.0584 21 16 0.0383 31 24 0.0031

2006 11 9 0.0540 21 17 0.0318 31 25 0.0024

2006 11 10 0.0442 21 18 0.0269 31 26 0.0015

2006 11 11 0.0333 21 19 0.0209 31 27 0.0009

2006 11 12 0.0260 21 20 0.0162 31 28 0.0005

2006 11 13 0.0204 21 21 0.0127 31 29 0.0003

2006 11 14 0.0195 21 22 0.0092 31 30 0.0037

2006 11 15 0.0188 21 23 0.0069 32 0 0.0059

2006 11 16 0.0153 21 24 0.0057 32 1 0.0452

2006 11 17 0.0128 21 25 0.0042 32 2 0.1089

2006 11 18 0.0091 21 26 0.0031 32 3 0.0740

2006 11 19 0.0085 21 27 0.0017 32 4 0.0699

2006 11 20 0.0078 21 28 0.0011 32 5 0.0388

2006 11 21 0.0078 21 29 0.0010 32 6 0.0331

2006 11 22 0.0074 21 30 0.0321 32 7 0.0376

2006 11 23 0.0106 31 0 0.0071 32 8 0.0370

2006 11 24 0.0156 31 1 0.0277 32 9 0.0441

2006 11 25 0.0144 31 2 0.0494 32 10 0.0557

2006 11 26 0.0126 31 3 0.0584 32 11 0.0557

2006 11 27 0.0163 31 4 0.0676 32 12 0.0472

2006 11 28 0.0237 31 5 0.0828 32 13 0.0456

2006 11 29 0.0163 31 6 0.0800 32 14 0.0385

2006 11 30 0.0723 31 7 0.0727 32 15 0.0609

2006 21 0 0.0075 31 8 0.0752 32 16 0.0476

2006 21 1 0.0279 31 9 0.0613 32 17 0.0340

2006 21 2 0.0396 31 10 0.0647 32 18 0.0273

2006 21 3 0.0489 31 11 0.0622 32 19 0.0155

2006 21 4 0.0508 31 12 0.0515 32 20 0.0156

2006 21 5 0.0537 31 13 0.0433 32 21 0.0156

2006 21 6 0.0561 31 14 0.0373 32 22 0.0118

2006 21 7 0.0595 31 15 0.0362 32 23 0.0095Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 14 Year

ID Source Type ID Age

ID Age

Fraction Source

Type ID Age

ID Age

Fraction Source

Type ID Age

ID Age

Fraction

2006 32 24 0.0045 42 2 0.0592 43 11 0.0557

2006 32 25 0.0057 42 3 0.0592 43 12 0.0843

2006 32 26 0.0044 42 4 0.0592 43 13 0.0484

2006 32 27 0.0019 42 5 0.0395 43 14 0.0178

2006 32 28 0.0010 42 6 0.0724 43 15 0.0192

2006 32 29 0.0007 42 7 0.0461 43 16 0.0129

2006 32 30 0.0068 42 8 0.0592 43 17 0.0132

2006 41 0 0.0013 42 9 0.0855 43 18 0.0181

2006 41 1 0.0344 42 10 0.0592 43 19 0.0213

2006 41 2 0.0607 42 11 0.1316 43 20 0.0139

2006 41 3 0.0837 42 12 0.0395 43 21 0.0087

2006 41 4 0.1005 42 13 0.0329 43 22 0.0077

2006 41 5 0.0870 42 14 0.0263 43 23 0.0087

2006 41 6 0.0972 42 15 0.0395 43 24 0.0056

2006 41 7 0.0607 42 16 0.0461 43 25 0.0066

2006 41 8 0.0742 42 17 0.0132 43 26 0.0049

2006 41 9 0.0472 42 18 0.0197 43 27 0.0024

2006 41 10 0.0466 42 19 0.0197 43 28 0.0017

2006 41 11 0.0614 42 20 0.0000 43 29 0.0038

2006 41 12 0.0290 42 21 0.0132 43 30 0.0064

2006 41 13 0.0263 42 22 0.0066 51 0 0.0097

2006 41 14 0.0189 42 23 0.0132 51 1 0.0290

2006 41 15 0.0162 42 24 0.0000 51 2 0.0258

2006 41 16 0.0229 42 25 0.0329 51 3 0.0839

2006 41 17 0.0142 42 26 0.0000 51 4 0.0968

2006 41 18 0.0081 42 27 0.0129 51 5 0.0226

2006 41 19 0.0175 42 28 0.0000 51 6 0.0677

2006 41 20 0.0101 42 29 0.0000 51 7 0.0774

2006 41 21 0.0101 42 30 0.0000 51 8 0.0419

2006 41 22 0.0121 43 0 0.0561 51 9 0.0323

2006 41 23 0.0094 43 1 0.0411 51 10 0.0710

2006 41 24 0.0061 43 2 0.0491 51 11 0.0710

2006 41 25 0.0034 43 3 0.0655 51 12 0.0613

2006 41 26 0.0081 43 4 0.0564 51 13 0.0516

2006 41 27 0.0020 43 5 0.0516 51 14 0.0387

2006 41 28 0.0000 43 6 0.0627 51 15 0.0419

2006 41 29 0.0034 43 7 0.0537 51 16 0.0355

2006 41 30 0.0273 43 8 0.0666 51 17 0.0161

2006 42 0 0.0000 43 9 0.0603 51 18 0.0258

2006 42 1 0.0132 43 10 0.0756 51 19 0.0129Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 15 Year

ID Source Type ID Age

ID Age

Fraction Source

Type ID Age

ID Age

Fraction Source

Type ID Age

ID Age

Fraction

2006 51 20 0.0000 52 29 0.0032 54 7 0.0450

2006 51 21 0.0032 52 30 0.0484 54 8 0.0417

2006 51 22 0.0065 53 0 0.0097 54 9 0.0414

2006 51 23 0.0032 53 1 0.0290 54 10 0.0524

2006 51 24 0.0032 53 2 0.0258 54 11 0.0482

2006 51 25 0.0065 53 3 0.0839 54 12 0.0409

2006 51 26 0.0032 53 4 0.0968 54 13 0.0334

2006 51 27 0.0000 53 5 0.0226 54 14 0.0356

2006 51 28 0.0097 53 6 0.0677 54 15 0.0315

2006 51 29 0.0032 53 7 0.0774 54 16 0.0285

2006 51 30 0.0484 53 8 0.0419 54 17 0.0254

2006 52 0 0.0097 53 9 0.0323 54 18 0.0197

2006 52 1 0.0290 53 10 0.0710 54 19 0.0177

2006 52 2 0.0258 53 11 0.0710 54 20 0.0180

2006 52 3 0.0839 53 12 0.0613 54 21 0.0263

2006 52 4 0.0968 53 13 0.0516 54 22 0.0243

2006 52 5 0.0226 53 14 0.0387 54 23 0.0230

2006 52 6 0.0677 53 15 0.0419 54 24 0.0166

2006 52 7 0.0774 53 16 0.0355 54 25 0.0193

2006 52 8 0.0419 53 17 0.0161 54 26 0.0208

2006 52 9 0.0323 53 18 0.0258 54 27 0.0130

2006 52 10 0.0710 53 19 0.0129 54 28 0.0089

2006 52 11 0.0710 53 20 0.0000 54 29 0.0074

2006 52 12 0.0613 53 21 0.0032 54 30 0.1404

2006 52 13 0.0516 53 22 0.0065 61 0 0.0021

2006 52 14 0.0387 53 23 0.0032 61 1 0.0135

2006 52 15 0.0419 53 24 0.0032 61 2 0.0306

2006 52 16 0.0355 53 25 0.0065 61 3 0.0385

2006 52 17 0.0161 53 26 0.0032 61 4 0.0509

2006 52 18 0.0258 53 27 0.0000 61 5 0.0527

2006 52 19 0.0129 53 28 0.0097 61 6 0.0590

2006 52 20 0.0000 53 29 0.0032 61 7 0.0584

2006 52 21 0.0032 53 30 0.0484 61 8 0.0571

2006 52 22 0.0065 54 0 0.0051 61 9 0.0551

2006 52 23 0.0032 54 1 0.0130 61 10 0.0628

2006 52 24 0.0032 54 2 0.0257 61 11 0.0608

2006 52 25 0.0065 54 3 0.0382 61 12 0.0501

2006 52 26 0.0032 54 4 0.0413 61 13 0.0542

2006 52 27 0.0000 54 5 0.0472 61 14 0.0390

2006 52 28 0.0097 54 6 0.0501 61 15 0.0435Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 16 Year

ID Source Type ID Age

ID Age

Fraction Source

Type ID Age

ID Age

Fraction Source

Type ID Age

ID Age

Fraction

2006 61 16 0.0430 62 1 0.0485 62 17 0.0079

2006 61 17 0.0314 62 2 0.0193 62 18 0.0039

2006 61 18 0.0269 62 3 0.1651 62 19 0.0026

2006 61 19 0.0228 62 4 0.0912 62 20 0.0032

2006 61 20 0.0192 62 5 0.1263 62 21 0.0034

2006 61 21 0.0217 62 6 0.0858 62 22 0.0027

2006 61 22 0.0203 62 7 0.0529 62 23 0.0013

2006 61 23 0.0144 62 8 0.0286 62 24 0.0008

2006 61 24 0.0135 62 9 0.0663 62 25 0.0008

2006 61 25 0.0099 62 10 0.1102 62 26 0.0006

2006 61 26 0.0069 62 11 0.0600 62 27 0.0002

2006 61 27 0.0036 62 12 0.0353 62 28 0.0001

2006 61 28 0.0032 62 13 0.0186 62 29 0.0003

2006 61 29 0.0028 62 14 0.0196 62 30 0.0001

2006 61 30 0.0321 62 15 0.0208

2006 62 0 0.0076 62 16 0.0160

2006Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 17 

### Road Type Distribution

Road type distribution is based on the 2008 ODOT, county summary, HPMS VMT data categorized by federal functional class obtained for the most populous four counties, and is applied to the region, similar to development of vehicle age distribution data used for the region. Road type distribution can be seen in Table 6.

Table 6 – Road Type Distribution

Source Type ID Road

Type ID Road Type VMT

Fraction Source Type

ID Road

Type ID Road Type VMT

Fraction

11 1 0 43 4 0.37

11 2 0.05 43 5 0.46

11 3 0.12 51 1 0

11 4 0.37 51 2 0.05

11 5 0.46 51 3 0.12

21 1 0 51 4 0.37

21 2 0.05 51 5 0.46

21 3 0.12 52 1 0

21 4 0.37 52 2 0.05

21 5 0.46 52 3 0.12

31 1 0 52 4 0.37

31 2 0.05 52 5 0.46

31 3 0.12 53 1 0

31 4 0.37 53 2 0.05

31 5 0.46 53 3 0.12

32 1 0 53 4 0.37

32 2 0.05 53 5 0.46

32 3 0.12 54 1 0

32 4 0.37 54 2 0.05

32 5 0.46 54 3 0.12

41 1 0 54 4 0.37

41 2 0.05 54 5 0.46

41 3 0.12 61 1 0

41 4 0.37 61 2 0.05

41 5 0.46 61 3 0.12

42 1 0 61 4 0.37

42 2 0.05 61 5 0.46

42 3 0.12 62 1 0

42 4 0.37 62 2 0.05

42 5 0.46 62 3 0.12

43 1 0 62 4 0.37

43 2 0.05 62 5 0.46

43 3 0.12Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 18 

### Vehicle Type VMT and VMT Fractions

The first component of the VMT inputs is the Yearly HPMS VMT, but the travel demand

model was used instead of ODOT’s HMPS data since it was felt that the model would better predict future year VMT. ODOT’s CMS post-processor was run for each year to generate congestion reports, which includes total daily VMT. The vehicle type percentages of the total VMT were based on ODOT’s weigh-in-motion (WIM) data. Since there are not enough WIM stations for lower class facilities in the non-attainment area, a statewide average of all ODOT WIM data collectors was used. Daily VMT was then converted to yearly. Yearly HPMS VMT for 2006 can be seen in Table 7. The same method was used to generate all other analysis years

Table 7 – Yearly HPMS VMT for 2006

HPMS VtypeID Year ID HPMS BaseYear VMT

10 2006 65,724,689

20 2006 11,721,479,841

30 2006 3,616,636,813

40 2006 36,966,843

50 2006 273,279,798

60 2006 648,816,441



### Monthly and daily VMT fractions used MOVES default data. The hourly VMT fractions were derived from ODOT WIM data. Hourly VMT fractions vary for each of the five MOVES road types but do not change for each of the 16 MOVES source types. A representative sample of the hour VMT fraction input file can be seen in Table 8, the entire file is too large to include in this document.

Table 8 – Hourly VMT Fractions

Source TypeID Road

TypeID DayID HourID Hour

VMTFraction

11 1 2 1 0.0089

11 1 2 2 0.00564

11 1 2 3 0.00424

11 1 2 4 0.00427

11 1 2 5 0.00695

11 1 2 6 0.01798

11 1 2 7 0.03806

11 1 2 8 0.057

11 1 2 9 0.05773

11 1 2 10 0.05538Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 19 Source TypeID Road

TypeID DayID HourID Hour

VMTFraction

11 1 2 11 0.05554

11 1 2 12 0.05558

11 1 2 13 0.05584

11 1 2 14 0.06051

11 1 2 15 0.06765

11 1 2 16 0.07755

11 1 2 17 0.08428

11 1 2 18 0.0797

11 1 2 19 0.06012

11 1 2 20 0.04522

11 1 2 21 0.03646

11 1 2 22 0.02912

11 1 2 23 0.02142

11 1 2 24 0.01486

11 2 2 1 0.0089

11 2 2 2 0.00564

11 2 2 3 0.00424

11 2 2 4 0.00427

11 2 2 5 0.00695

11 2 2 6 0.01798

11 2 2 7 0.03806

11 2 2 8 0.057

11 2 2 9 0.05773

11 2 2 10 0.05538

11 2 2 11 0.05554

11 2 2 12 0.05558

11 2 2 13 0.05584

11 2 2 14 0.06051

11 2 2 15 0.06765

11 2 2 16 0.07755

11 2 2 17 0.08428

11 2 2 18 0.0797

11 2 2 19 0.06012

11 2 2 20 0.04522

11 2 2 21 0.03646

11 2 2 22 0.02912

11 2 2 23 0.02142

11 2 2 24 0.01486Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 20 Source TypeID Road

TypeID DayID HourID Hour

VMTFraction

11 3 2 1 0.00655

11 3 2 2 0.0037

11 3 2 3 0.00304

11 3 2 4 0.00363

11 3 2 5 0.00792

11 3 2 6 0.02343

11 3 2 7 0.04899

11 3 2 8 0.06319

11 3 2 9 0.05402

11 3 2 10 0.05121

11 3 2 11 0.0528

11 3 2 12 0.05608

11 3 2 13 0.05814

11 3 2 14 0.05875

11 3 2 15 0.06676

11 3 2 16 0.07812

11 3 2 17 0.08469

11 3 2 18 0.08152

11 3 2 19 0.05852

11 3 2 20 0.04343

11 3 2 21 0.03606

11 3 2 22 0.02829

11 3 2 23 0.01883

11 3 2 24 0.01233

11 4 2 1 0.00752

11 4 2 2 0.0044

11 4 2 3 0.00354

11 4 2 4 0.00374

11 4 2 5 0.00705

11 4 2 6 0.02123

11 4 2 7 0.054

11 4 2 8 0.0768

11 4 2 9 0.06545

11 4 2 10 0.05114

11 4 2 11 0.04692

11 4 2 12 0.04916

11 4 2 13 0.05112

11 4 2 14 0.0534

11 4 2 15 0.06105Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 21 Source TypeID Road

TypeID DayID HourID Hour

VMTFraction

11 4 2 16 0.07421

11 4 2 17 0.08321

11 4 2 18 0.08385

11 4 2 19 0.06062

11 4 2 20 0.04229

11 4 2 21 0.03442

11 4 2 22 0.0292

11 4 2 23 0.02137

11 4 2 24 0.01431

11 5 2 1 0.00678

11 5 2 2 0.00378

11 5 2 3 0.00295

11 5 2 4 0.0029

11 5 2 5 0.00498

11 5 2 6 0.01422

11 5 2 7 0.03449

11 5 2 8 0.05728

11 5 2 9 0.05435

11 5 2 10 0.04991

11 5 2 11 0.05261

11 5 2 12 0.06098

11 5 2 13 0.06457

11 5 2 14 0.06387

11 5 2 15 0.06812

11 5 2 16 0.07672

11 5 2 17 0.08274

11 5 2 18 0.08284

11 5 2 19 0.06344

11 5 2 20 0.04866

11 5 2 21 0.0407

11 5 2 22 0.03083

11 5 2 23 0.01966

11 5 2 24 0.01262Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 22 

### Output Emission Factors

Table 9 shows the first record in a MOVES sample output (rate per distance) emission file for year 2006. For any given month, day of week, hour of the day, pollutant, and process; the rate per distance varies by road type, and speed bin. Rates per distance emissions are applied to link and intrazonal VMT.

Table 9 – Sample Emission File (Rate per Distance) for year 2006

Heading: MOVESScenarioID MOVESRunID yearID monthID dayID hourID

Record: OhioCustomDomain 6 2006 7 5 1
Heading: linkID pollutantID processID sourceTypeID SCC fuelTypeID

Record: 990250201 3 1 1 0
Heading: modelYearID roadTypeID avgSpeedBinID temperature relHumidity ratePerDistance

Record: 0 2 1 48.9333 73 15.1949



### Table 10 shows the first record in a MOVES sample output (rate per vehicle) emission file for year 2006. The rate per vehicle varies for any combinations of month, day of week, hour of the day, pollutant, and process. Rates per vehicle emissions are applied to the vehicle source type population.

Table 10 – Sample Emission File (Rate per Vehicle) for year 2006

Heading: MOVESScenarioID MOVESRunI

D yearID monthID dayID

Record: OhioCustomDomain 6 2006 7 5
Heading: hourID zoneID pollutantID processID sourceTypeID

Record: 1 990250 3 0 2

Heading: SCC fuelTypeID modelYearI

D temperatur

e ratePerVehicl

e

Record: 0 0 48.9333 0.060425



### Air Quality Consultation Process

The 1990 Clean Air Act amendments required identification of the consultation procedures that Ohio's air quality and transportation agencies will follow in the conformity process. To fulfill this requirement, the Ohio EPA has adopted Ohio Administrative Code 3745-101-04 to define the interagency consultation procedures used on air quality issues. These rules define a "straw man" process, whereby the lead agencies in the conformity process assume responsibility for preparing and distributing draft documents, with supporting information, and ensuring that each affected party involved in the conformity process is included in the consultation process. In addition, a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between MORPC, LCATS, ODOT and Ohio EPA has been signed to clarify OAC 3745-101-04 for the Columbus maintenance area.Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 23 

### As a result of SAFETEA-LU Ohio EPA led the process to update MOU. This process is concluding with signatures from all parties obtained in February/March 2008.

The Columbus non-attainment area SIP development process employed the consultation procedures embodied in the rules. The procedures used in the current air quality analysis are comparable to the previous on road emission inventory and forecasting process. In addition, MORPC has had various telephone conversations and e-mail correspondence with Ohio EPA, ODOT and FHWA. Ohio EPA has also

discussed various issues with U.S. EPA.

2.4.1 Vehicle Age Distribution

OEPA provided vehicle age distribution information that was derived using USEPAs VIN decoder and Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicle registration data. The registration data for Central Ohio area, Vehicle age distribution used to represent the MORPC/LCATS area

is listed in Table 5.

2.4.2 Temperatures

The low and high input temperatures used for MORPC area was given by OEPA. ODOT developed an average daily temperature distribution profile to derive the hourly temperature values. Temperature data input used is shown in table 2.

2.5 Computations Methodology

2.5.1 Areas with Regional Model

Post Processing

Custom programs developed by ODOT in conjunction with MPO models, were used in computing total emissions. The process uses data on daily and directional traffic distributions as well as more up to date volume/delay functions from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). This process, described below, uses rewritten code able to handle the newer model network formats and MOVES generated emission factors.

The first step in the process involves running postcms10.exe to calculate hourly link volumes based on the percentage of the daily volume (travel demand model output) determined by a link’s facility and area type. Link speeds from the travel demand model are not used in the analysis. The speeds are estimated as a post-process to the model based on HCM methods using a link’s volume-to-capacity ratio and link group code. The daily to hourly volume conversion percentages and speed tables can be seen in Appendix A, model script.Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 24 

### The second step (movesnet.exe) uses a combination of the MOVES emission factors and the hourly link volumes that are output of the postcms10.exe program. The hourly volumes are multiplied by the MOVES emission factor for the corresponding hour of day, speed bin, and roadtype to calculate emissions for every network link for each

hour. The final link on road vehicle emissions for the area is the sum of all individual

link-hour emissions.

The third step, (movesveh.exe), calculates vehicle-based emissions for each source type for each hour of the day. The vehicle source type is based on a combination of local and default data. The final vehicle emissions for each county are the sum of all individual hourly emissions for all vehicle types.

Intrazonal trips do not get loaded onto the network, so the fourth step in the process requires a separate method to account for those trips that use local roads to travel within a zone. The intracalc2.exe program uses intrazonal trips to estimate VMT using the area in square miles and intrazonal trips of each zone. The zone is assumed circular and the radius of the circle is used as the average trip length for these intrazonal trips. Intrazonal emissions are then calculated by combining MOVES generated emissions with estimated intrazonal VMT. The emission rates are the same

as those used to calculated link based emissions.

The final step is to summarize link, vehicle, and intrazonal emissions for each county, pollutant, and analyzed year, and to multiply annual average daily emissions by 365 to produce an annual estimate. Daily summary emissions for each pollutant, county, and scenario year in the Central Ohio Region can be found in Appendix B through G. A summary of these emissions are tabulated in Sections 3.1.1 and 3.1.2

2.5.2 Areas without Regional Model

The travel demand forecasting model discussed in the preceding sections does not cover the entire non-attainment area. Therefore, a standard process based on HPMS VMT was employed for the rest of the area which includes portions of Fairfield County, Madison County, and Knox County. This process first requires estimating the proportion of county VMT covered by the model and not covered by the model. This was accomplished using a GIS procedure, whereby, the proportion of the number of vehicles from census data, inside and outside of the model boundary, was calculated. This information was then combined with countywide average volumes by functional class to obtain the proportion of VMT inside and outside of the model. This computation yields 47% of the Fairfield county VMT, being inside the model area. Thus 53% of the HPMS VMT is used as the basis of the off-model computation for Fairfield County. For Madison County 71% HPMS VMT is used as the basis of the off-model computation of emissions. HPMS VMT data is used for all of Knox County. To obtain forecast year emissions, the base year VMT is projected forward based on a series of standard growth rates as shown in the “HPMS Growth Rates Methodology” based on VMT forecasting procedures developed by ODOT. These growth rates are updated every 5 years using the latest count trends.Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 25 

### Correctly applying the VMT growth rates is not as straight forward as multiplying the % per year growth by most current year and the number of years. The growth rate is derived for use as a linear growth rate, constant slope. To make the forecast using the same slope, the percentage growth must first be applied to the most current HPMS VMT data for year 2009 to convert the percentage into a growth rate (VMT/year) which is the slope of the line.

VMT by functional classification obtained for outside regional model area, also provides speed data based on the type of facility. MOVES generated factors of rate per distance as well as rate per vehicle were used to generate emissions for VOC, and NOx. A summary of these emissions are tabulated in Sections 3.1.2 and 3.1.3Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 26 

## 3.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS

Emission estimates summary of results is presented in the next sections.

3.1.1 Areas within The Regional Travel Demand Model

Table 11: Emission Estimations for On-Road Mobile Sources - Franklin County



### Franklin County 2002 2006 2012 2020 2035 

### VMT (miles/day) 30,473,707 33,989,641 34,609,039 37,688,274 43,564,874 

### VOC (tons/day) 144.874 112.929 61.455 31.880 26.481 

### NOx (tons/day) 224.335 194.950 118.111 59.958 47.672

Table 12: Emission Estimations for On-Road Mobile Sources - Delaware County



### Delaware County 2002 2006 2012 2020 2035 

### VMT (miles/day) 4,482,756 5,001,802 5,811,519 7,141,185 9,712,948 

### VOC (tons/day) 13.094 9.993 6.312 3.780 3.778 

### NOx (tons/day) 24.622 21.071 14.625 8.488 8.074

Table 13: Emission Estimations for On-Road Mobile Sources - Licking County



### Licking County 2002 2006 2012 2020 2035 

### VMT (miles/day) 5,399,830 5,409,966 5,613,225 6,557,551 8,284,431 

### VOC (tons/day) 18.080 13.286 6.991 4.021 3.789 

### NOx (tons/day) 32.134 25.920 15.341 8.557 7.648

3.1.2 Areas partially within The Regional Travel Demand Model

Counties that are partially within regional travel demand model are Fairfield county, and Madison county.

Tables 14a, and 14b, summarize emissions estimates for Fairfield county, for the areas within and outside travel demand model area, respectively. Results presented in Table 14a is for the area covered by the travel demand model. Table 14b is for the area not covered by the travel demand model. These are derived by using 53% of the total county HPMS based VMT as described in section 2.5.2. Table 14c presents the emissions for the entire Fairfield county, which is simply sum of emissions from Tables 14a, and 14b.

Table 14a: Emission Estimations for Fairfield County within the Travel Demand Model

Area

Fairfield County 2002 2006 2012 2020 2035 

### VMT (miles/day) 1,481,594 1,845,407 1,910,822 2,312,642 3,090,499 

### VOC (tons/day) 3.266 3.291 1.961 1.174 1.180 

### NOx (tons/day) 6.920 7.287 4.633 2.678 2.551Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 27 Table 14b: Emission Estimations for Fairfield County outside of the Travel Demand Model Area- using HPMS data

Fairfield County 2002 2006 2012 2020 2035 

### VMT (miles/day) 1,531,253 1,664,495 1,781,497 1,979,083 2,361,780 

### VOC (tons/day) 2.754 2.411 1.536 0.896 0.817 

### NOx (tons/day) 6.108 5.393 3.490 1.974 1.765

Table 14c: Emission Estimations for Fairfield County

sum of emissions from both the Travel Demand Model area as well as the HPMS area

Tables 15a, and 15b, summarize emissions estimates for Madison county, for the areas within and outside travel demand area, respectively. Results presented in Table 15a is for the area covered by the travel demand model. Table 15b is for the area not covered by the travel demand model. These are derived by using 71% of the Madison county HPMS based VMT as described in section 2.5.2. Table 15c presents the emissions for the entire Madison county, which is simply sum of emissions from Tables 15a, and 15b.

Table 15a: Emission Estimations for Madison County within the Travel Demand Model

Area

Table 15b: Emission Estimations for Madison County outside of the Travel Demand Model Area - using HPMS data Fairfield County 2002 2006 2012 2020 2035 

### VMT (miles/day) 3,012,847 3,509,902 3,692,318 4,291,725 5,452,279 

### VOC (tons/day) 6.019 5.702 3.497 2.070 1.997 

### NOx (tons/day) 13.028 12.679 8.123 4.652 4.316

Madison County 2002 2006 2012 2020 2035 

### VMT (miles/day) 982,179 903,123 968,070 1,152,531 1,515,536 

### VOC (tons/day) 3.063 1.609 0.951 0.557 0.545 

### NOx (tons/day) 5.686 3.565 2.299 1.298 1.203

Madison County 2002 2006 2012 2020 2035 

### VMT (miles/day) 1,391,325 1,512,392 1,618,701 1,798,232 2,145,958 

### VOC (tons/day) 2.502 2.191 1.396 0.814 0.742 

### NOx (tons/day) 5.550 4.900 3.171 1.793 1.603Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 28 Table 15c: Emission Estimations for Madison County

sum of emissions from both the Travel Demand Model area as well as the HPMS area

3.1.3 Area outside Regional Travel Demand Model

Tables 16, summarizes emissions estimates for Knox county, and the results presented in this Table used methodology based on HPMS data.

Table 16: Emission Estimations for Knox County – using only HPMS

3.1.4 Total Emissions for the Columbus/Central Ohio area

Table 17, summarizes emissions estimates for the entire six county area. These emissions presented here is simply sum of all emissions in six counties summarized in Tables 11 through

16.

Table 17: Emission Estimations for On-Road Mobile Sources for Columbus/Central Ohio Madison County 2002 2006 2012 2020 2035 

### VMT (miles/day) 2,373,505 2,415,515 2,586,771 2,950,763 3,661,494 

### VOC (tons/day) 5.565 3.800 2.347 1.371 1.288 

### NOx (tons/day) 11.236 8.465 5.470 3.092 2.807

Knox County 2002 2006 2012 2020 2035 

### VMT (miles/day) 1,117,218 1,214,433 1,299,798 1,443,959 1,723,179 

### VOC (tons/day) 2.009 1.759 1.121 0.654 0.596 

### NOx (tons/day) 4.456 3.935 2.546 1.440 1.288

Central Ohio Area 2002 2006 2012 2020 2035 

### VMT (miles/day) 46,859,862 51,541,259 53,612,671 60,073,457 72,399,205 

### VOC (tons/day) 189.642 147.469 81.723 43.776 37.928 

### NOx (tons/day) 309.811 267.020 164.216 86.186 71.803Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 29 

### 3.2 Emissions Summary for the Columbus/Central Ohio Area

Tables 18 and 19, summarize VOC and NOx emissions estimates respectively for the analysis years. The summary presented in the following tables is from the aforementioned in Tables 11 through 16.

Table 18: VOC Emission Inventory Summary

- Base Year 2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012, 2020, and 2030 (tons/day)

2002 2006 2012 2020 2035

VOC Base Year Attainment Interim Year Maintenance Horizon Year

Franklin 144.874 112.929 61.455 31.880 26.481

Delaware 13.094 9.993 6.312 3.780 3.778

Licking 18.080 13.286 6.991 4.021 3.789

Fairfield 6.019 5.702 3.497 2.070 1.997

Madison 5.565 3.800 2.347 1.371 1.288

Knox 2.009 1.759 1.121 0.654 0.596

Total 189.642 147.469 81.723 43.776 37.928

Table 19: NOx Emission Inventory Summary

- Base Year 2002, Estimated 2006 and Projected 2012, 2020, and 2030 (tons/per day)

2002 2006 2012 2020 2035

NOx Base Year Attainment Interim Year Maintenance Horizon Year

Franklin 224.335 194.950 118.111 59.958 47.672

Delaware 24.622 21.071 14.625 8.488 8.074

Licking 32.134 25.920 15.341 8.557 7.648

Fairfield 13.028 12.679 8.123 4.652 4.316

Madison 11.236 8.465 5.470 3.092 2.807

Knox 4.456 3.935 2.546 1.440 1.288

Total 309.811 267.020 164.216 86.186 71.803Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 30 

## APPENDIX

• Appendix A –Model Script for computing emissions

• Appendix B – MORPC Travel Demand Model Emission Run Report for 2002

• Appendix C – MORPC Travel Demand Model Emission Run Report for 2006

• Appendix D – MORPC Travel Demand Model Emission Run Report for 2012

• Appendix E – MORPC Travel Demand Model Emission Run Report for 2020

• Appendix F – MORPC Travel Demand Model Emission Run Report for 2035

• Appendix G – MORPC HPMS VMT and Emissions

• Appendix H – Interagency ConsultationCentral Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201231Appendix A – Model Script, Figures illustrating DataCUBE VOYAGER PROGRAM SCRIPT FOR COMPUTING VOC & NOx EMISSIONS;[CMS (AQ), Produce Viper Network Output];;<<Process Template>>;;;Input Network File: {cm3neti,filename,"Input Network FileName",x,"N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\networks\2006\AQ_asgn_2006.net","Network File (*.net)|*.net"};Output Network File: {cm3neto,filename,"Output Network FileName",x,"N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\networks\2006\AQ_2006out.net","Network File (*.net)|*.net"};Output CSV Summary File: {cm3sumo,filename,"OutputCSV SummaryFile",x,"N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\networks\2006\fra06.csv","Report File (*.csv;*.txt)|*.csv;*.txt"};Output TXT Report File: {cm3rpto,filename,"Output TXT ReportFile",x,"N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\networks\2006\fra06.rpt","Report File (*.rpt;*.txt)|*.rpt;*.txt"};Output CSV Hourly File: {cm3hro,filename,"Output CSV Hourly File (Needed for benefits calc but verybig)",x,"NONE","Report File (*.csv;*.txt)|*.csv;*.txt"};Note: {cm3junkname,note,"Optional Air Quality Files, Leave Blank When Not Doing Air Quality Calculations"};AQ Run Type: {cm3aqtype,combolist,"AQ Run Type","MOVES","NONE","MOBILE"};AQ Comment Line: {cm3aqcom,editbox,"Optional AQ Report Comment",T,"Ozone Analysis with MOVES - MORPC"};Input Network Emissions Factors: {cm3effile,filename,"Input Network (per distance)EmissionsFactors",x,"N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\2006MORPC_ozone_3source_rpd.csv","Emissions File(*.fac;*.csv)|*.fac;*.csv"};Input Vehicle (MOV) or Intrazonal (MOB) Emissions Factors: {cm3ieffile,filename,"Input Vehicle (MOV) orIntrazonal (MOB) EmissionsFactors",x,"N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\2006MORPC_ozone_3source_rpv.csv","Emissions File (*.crd;*.csv)|*.crd; *.csv"};Input area file: {cm3afile,filename,"Input AreaFile",x,"N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\area_taz\TAZ_areain.txt","Text File (*.txt; *.prn)|*.txt; *.prn"};Input Intrazonal Trips File: {cm3ifile,filename,"Input Intrazonal Trips (Matrix must be OMS format else usetext)",x,"N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\intra_z\county\FRA06.txt","Matrix or Text File (*.txt; *.prn;*.mat; *.trp)|*.txt; *.prn; *.mat; *.trp"};Intrazonal File Type: {cm3iztype,combolist,"Intrazonal File Type","TEXT","NONE","OMSTABLE"};Input vehicle file: {cm3vfile,filename,"Input Vehicle File (MovesOnly)",x,"N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\Source_Type_Pop_2006_MORPC_on-Model.csv","Text File(*.csv)|*.csv"};Space: {cm3space,note,"Parameters"};Truck PCE: {cm3tpce,editbox,"Truck PCE",N,"2.0"};Capacity Field: {cm3capf,comboedit,"Capacity Field","CAP24","CAP1","CAP2","CAP3","CAP4"};Hourly/Model Capacity Factor: {cm3kfact,editbox,"Hourly/Model(usually daily) Capacity Factor",N,"0.10"};AQ Season Factor: {cm3aqfact,comboedit,"AQ Season Factor (Ozone Only)","1.08","1.00"}Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201232;Set Priority Code from ADMCLASS?:{cm3pri,combolist,"Set Priority Code from ADMCLASS? (CMSCOST canuse)","NO","SW","OMS"};Run Mode: {cm3rmode,combolist,"Run Mode (usually use Normal forAQ)","NORMAL","4PERIOD_OMS","4PERIOD_SW","4PERIOD_MARKETSEGMENTS_SW"};Note: {cm3junkname2,note,"Normal Mode Inputs (if you specify another mode the fields are predetermined)"};Volume Field: {cm3volf,comboedit,"Volume Field", "VOL24_TOT","V_1", "LOADEDVOL","WINTERVOL","SUMMERVOL"};Truck Volume Field: {cm3trkf,comboedit,"Truck Volume Field (leave to NONE for AQ unless EFs generated bysource)", "NONE","VOL24_TRK","VOL24_TRKHV","V2_1"};;<<End Parameters>>;;*if exist tempcms.txt DEL tempcms.txt*if exist summary.rpt DEL summary.rpt*if exist hourly.rpt DEL hourly.rpt*if exist cmstext.rpt DEL cmstext.rptCOPY FILE=county.datADA 1 4ALL 2 3ASD 3 4ATB 4 4ATH 5 4AUG 6 4BEL 7 3BRO 8 4BUT 9 2CAR10 4CHP11 4CLA12 3CLE13 2CLI14 4COL15 4COS16 4CRA17 4CUY18 1DAR19 4DEF20 4DEL21 2ERI22 3FAI23 4FAY24 4FRA25 1FUL26 4GAL27 4Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201233GEA28 2GRE29 2GUE30 4HAM31 1HAN32 4HAR33 4HAS34 4HEN35 4HIG36 4HOC37 4HOL38 4HUR39 4JAC40 4JEF41 3KNO42 4LAK43 2LAW44 3LIC45 3LOG46 4LOR47 2LUC48 2MAD49 4MAH50 2MAR51 4MED52 2MEG53 4MER54 4MIA55 2MOE56 4MOT57 2MRG58 4MRW59 4MUS60 4NOB61 4OTT62 4PAU63 4PER64 4PIC65 4PIK66 4POR67 2PRE68 4Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201234PUT69 4RIC70 3ROS71 4SAN72 4SCI73 4SEN74 4SHE75 4STA76 2SUM77 2TRU78 2TUS79 4UNI80 4VAN81 4VIN82 4WAR83 2WAS84 3WAY85 4WIL86 4WOO87 2WYA88 4ENDCOPYCOPY FILE=dailya.datHOUR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1112 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23PCTADTURB FWY 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 2.2 5.2 7.3 6.4 5.2 4.9 5.15.3 5.5 6.1 7.2 8.0 7.9 5.8 4.2 3.4 2.9 2.2 1.5URB ART 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.5 3.5 5.7 5.5 5.1 5.3 6.26.5 6.4 6.8 7.6 8.2 8.1 6.2 4.8 4.0 3.0 1.9 1.3RUR FWY 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.2 3.7 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.65.7 6.0 6.5 7.1 7.5 7.0 5.6 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.0RUR ART 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.0 2.4 4.8 6.2 5.5 5.3 5.5 5.86.0 6.0 6.7 7.6 8.1 7.7 5.6 4.2 3.5 2.8 1.9 1.3PCTADT TRKURB FWY 2.1 1.9 1.8 2.0 2.4 3.0 3.9 4.6 5.3 6.0 6.3 6.46.4 6.4 6.3 5.8 5.2 4.6 4.1 3.7 3.4 3.1 2.8 2.4URB ART 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.3 3.9 5.9 6.9 6.7 7.1 7.67.4 7.2 7.4 7.2 6.0 5.0 3.7 2.8 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.3RUR FWY 2.6 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.6 3.1 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.1 5.6 5.85.8 5.8 5.8 5.6 5.3 4.9 4.6 4.3 4.0 3.8 3.5 3.1Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201235RUR ART 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.6 2.2 3.0 4.2 5.3 6.1 6.7 7.0 7.17.0 6.9 6.8 6.3 5.5 4.6 3.8 3.1 2.6 2.3 2.1 1.7PCTDIRURB FWY 38 40 40 46 56 64 70 70 68 62 58 5252 52 50 46 38 38 46 52 46 42 42 40URB ART 44 46 44 48 54 62 66 68 64 56 54 5250 50 50 46 40 38 46 52 48 46 46 46RUR FWY 44 46 48 54 60 68 68 64 58 54 52 5050 52 52 48 42 40 44 48 48 44 46 44RUR ART 40 42 44 48 58 66 72 68 60 56 54 5050 50 50 46 40 38 46 50 46 44 44 44LOS E VC 0 0.625 1.25 1.875 2.5 3.125 3.75 4.375 5 5.625 6.25 6.8757.5 8.125 8.75 9.375 10 10.625 11.25 11.875 12.5 13.125 13.75 14.375SPEEDVCcurve1 75 75 75 75 75 75 74.9 74.8 74.6 74.2 73.5 72.370.5 67.8 64.2 59.5 54 47.7 41.2 34.9 28.9 23.7 19.2 15.5curve2 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 69.9 69.8 69.6 69.2 68.467.1 65.1 62.2 58.2 53 47 40.5 33.9 27.7 22.2 17.6 13.8curve3 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 64.9 64.8 64.463.8 62.6 60.5 57 52 45.4 37.8 29.9 22.7 16.7 12.1 8.6curve4 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.8 59.659.1 58.2 56.7 54.3 50.8 46.1 40.3 33.8 27.3 21.3 16.2 12.2curve5 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.954.7 54.3 53.6 52.3 50 46.5 41.5 35.3 28.5 21.9 16.1 11.5curve6 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.8 59.7 59.459.1 58.5 57.7 56.5 55 53.1 50.7 47.9 44.7 41.1 37.3 33.4curve7 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.9 54.9 54.7 54.554.2 53.8 53.1 52.2 50.9 49.3 47.3 44.9 42.1 39 35.7 32.2curve8 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.9 49.8 49.649.4 49 48.5 47.7 46.7 45.4 43.8 41.8 39.5 36.8 33.9 30.9curve9 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 44.9 44.8 44.744.4 44.1 43.6 43 42.1 40.9 39.4 37.6 35.5 33.1 30.5 27.8curve10 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.7 49.4 49 48.4 47.5 46.545.1 43.5 41.7 39.6 37.3 34.9 32.4 29.8 27.3 24.9 22.6 20.4curve11 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.7 49.4 48.9 48 46.7 44.942.5 39.6 36.2 32.6 28.7 25 21.4 18.2 15.3 12.9 10.8 9curve12 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.6 49.1 48.2 46.8 44.541.4 37.5 32.9 28 23.1 18.7 14.9 11.8 9.2 7.2 5.7 4.5curve13 40 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.5 39.2 38.6 37.836.7 35.3 33.5 31.4 29 26.4 23.7 21.1 18.5 16.1 13.9 12Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201236curve14 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.6 39.1 38.5 37.5 36.134.3 32.1 29.4 26.5 23.5 20.5 17.7 15.1 12.8 10.7 9 7.6curve15 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.7 39.4 38.8 37.9 36.5 34.732.3 29.5 26.4 23.2 20 17 14.3 11.9 9.9 8.2 6.8 5.6curve16 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.8 34.5 34 33.2 32.1 30.528.5 26.1 23.5 20.6 17.9 15.2 12.8 10.7 8.9 7.4 6.1 5.1curve17 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.7 34.4 33.9 33.1 32 30.328.3 25.8 23.1 20.3 17.5 14.9 12.5 10.4 8.6 7.2 5.9 4.9curve18 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.6 34.2 33.5 32.4 30.9 28.826.3 23.4 20.4 17.4 14.6 12.1 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.6curve19 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.8 29.5 29 28.2 27.1 25.623.7 21.5 19.1 16.6 14.2 12 10 8.3 6.8 5.6 4.6 3.8curve20 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.4 28.9 28.1 26.9 25.323.4 21.1 18.6 16.1 13.6 11.4 9.5 7.8 6.4 5.3 4.3 3.6curve21 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.3 28.7 27.7 26.2 24.422.1 19.6 17 14.4 12 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.6 2.9VC RATIO TO LOS CONVERSION (VALUE SHOWN IS LOWER LIMIT FOR THAT LOS)(URBAN ROADS USE SPEED BREAKS BELOW FORLOS DETERMINATION) (ALL USE THE BASE VC'S TO DETERMINE EXCEEDANCE)BASE RUR2 FWYA 0.00 0.00 0.00B 0.30 0.00 0.25C 0.50 0.10 0.40D 0.70 0.30 0.60E 0.90 0.50 0.80F 1.00 1.00 1.00F+ 1.10 1.10 1.10F++ 1.30 1.30 1.30SPEED VC RATIO BREAKS FOR URBAN STREETS (HIGHEST SPEED FOR GIVEN LOS & FF SPEED)FFS B C D E F>47 42. 34. 27. 21. 16.>37 35. 28. 22. 17. 13.>32 30. 24. 18. 14. 10.<33 25. 19. 13. 9. 7.LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLD BY AREANUM LOS DEFINITION1 F CINCINNATI,CLEVELAND,COLUMBUS CENTRAL MPO COUNTIES (CUY,FRA,HAM)2 E OTHER TMA MPOS (AKRON,CANTON,DAYTON,TOLEDO,YOUNGSTOWN + NON-CENTRAL COUNTIES FROM 1)3 E OTHER MPOS & PARTS OF AREAS 1 & 2 OUTSIDE URBANIZED AREACentral Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 2012374 E RURAL NON MPO COUNTIESPEAK SPREADING MODEL INFO (SET MAX ITERATIONS TO 0 TO DISABLE PEAK SPREADING)MAX VC RATIO FWY: 1.30MAX VC RATIO ART: 1.30MAX ITERATIONS : 1000TRUCK PCE: {cm3tpce}AQ SEASON FACTOR: {cm3aqfact}ENDCOPYrrmode='{cm3rmode}'if(rrmode='NORMAL')COPY FILE=dailyb.datMODEL CLASS PARAMETERS (MAX 4 CLASSES, HOURS 0-23 W/ NO OVERLAP IN CLASS, ALLOCATE ENTIRE CLASS AS TRUCK(1)OR NOT(0))CLS TRK 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0CLS BEG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0CLS END 23 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0CLS NUM 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0ENDCOPYvolff='li.1.{cm3volf}'trkfff='{cm3trkf}'if (trkfff == 'NONE') thentrkff='_zero'elsetrkff='li.1.{cm3trkf}'endifvol1s='_zero'vol2s='_zero'vol3s='_zero'vol4s='_zero'vol5s='_zero'vol6s='_zero'vol7s='_zero'Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201238vol8s='_zero'vol9s='_zero'vol10s='_zero'vol11s='_zero'vol12s='_zero'vol13s='_zero'vol14s='_zero'vol15s='_zero'vol16s='_zero'elseif(rrmode='4PERIOD_OMS')COPY FILE=dailyb.datMODEL CLASS PARAMETERS (MAX 4 CLASSES, HOURS 0-23 W/ NO OVERLAP IN CLASS, ALLOCATE ENTIRE CLASS AS TRUCK(1)OR NOT(0))CLS TRK 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 00 0 0 0CLS BEG 18 6 9 14 18 6 9 14 0 0 0 00 0 0 0CLS END 5 8 13 17 5 8 13 17 0 0 0 00 0 0 0CLS NUM 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 00 0 0 0ENDCOPYvolff='_zero'trkff='_zero'vol1s='li.1.volnt_aut'vol2s='li.1.volam_aut'vol3s='li.1.volmd_aut'vol4s='li.1.volpm_aut'vol5s='li.1.volnt_trk'vol6s='li.1.volam_trk'vol7s='li.1.volmd_trk'vol8s='li.1.volpm_trk'vol9s='_zero'vol10s='_zero'vol11s='_zero'vol12s='_zero'vol13s='_zero'vol14s='_zero'vol15s='_zero'vol16s='_zero'Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201239elseif(rrmode='4PERIOD_SW')COPY FILE=dailyb.datMODEL CLASS PARAMETERS (MAX 4 CLASSES, HOURS 0-23 W/ NO OVERLAP IN CLASS, ALLOCATE ENTIRE CLASS AS TRUCK(1)OR NOT(0))CLS TRK 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 00 0 0 0CLS BEG 19 7 10 16 19 7 10 16 0 0 0 00 0 0 0CLS END 6 9 15 18 6 9 15 18 0 0 0 00 0 0 0CLS NUM 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 00 0 0 0ENDCOPYvolff='_zero'trkff='_zero'vol1s='li.1.evvol_aut'vol2s='li.1.amvol_aut'vol3s='li.1.mdvol_aut'vol4s='li.1.pmvol_aut'vol5s='li.1.evvol_trk'vol6s='li.1.amvol_trk'vol7s='li.1.mdvol_trk'vol8s='li.1.pmvol_trk'vol9s='_zero'vol10s='_zero'vol11s='_zero'vol12s='_zero'vol13s='_zero'vol14s='_zero'vol15s='_zero'vol16s='_zero'elseif(rrmode='4PERIOD_MARKETSEGMENTS_SW')COPY FILE=dailyb.datMODEL CLASS PARAMETERS (MAX 4 CLASSES, HOURS 0-23 W/ NO OVERLAP IN CLASS, ALLOCATE ENTIRE CLASS AS TRUCK(1)OR NOT(0))CLS TRK 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 00 0 0 0CLS BEG 19 7 10 16 19 7 10 16 19 7 10 1619 7 10 16Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201240CLS END 6 9 15 18 6 9 15 18 6 9 15 186 9 15 18CLS NUM 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 24 4 4 4ENDCOPYvolff='_zero'trkff='_zero'vol1s='li.1.evvol_autwk'vol2s='li.1.amvol_autwk'vol3s='li.1.mdvol_autwk'vol4s='li.1.pmvol_autwk'vol5s='li.1.evvol_trkhv'vol6s='li.1.amvol_trkhv'vol7s='li.1.mdvol_trkhv'vol8s='li.1.pmvol_trkhv'vol9s='li.1.evvol_autnw'vol10s='li.1.amvol_autnw'vol11s='li.1.mdvol_autnw'vol12s='li.1.pmvol_autnw'vol13s='li.1.evvol_trklt'vol14s='li.1.amvol_trklt'vol15s='li.1.mdvol_trklt'vol16s='li.1.pmvol_trklt'endif*if exist daily.dat del daily.dat*copy dailya.dat+dailyb.dat daily.dat*del dailya.dat*del dailyb.datRUN PGM=NETWORKNETI={cm3neti.q}LINKO=templnk.txt, format = TXT, include = a(6),b(6),junk1(1),junk1(4),junks(1),moffpspd(4),ctoll(4),junkb(1),lanes(1),twidth(2),junkb(1),terrain(1),junk1(1),junkb(1),cap(6),vol(6),loneway(1),boffpspd(4),ttoll(4),junkb(1),blanes(1),areatype(1),admclass(1),junkb(1),bterrain(1),junk1(1),junkb(1),bcap(6),bvol(6),medturn(1),pcttrk(2),junk1(2),funclass(2),lnkgrp(2),mpostspd(2),jurisdic(1),county(3),rtenumb(5),junk1(7),nhs(1),fedfunc(2),trkvol(5),junkp(1),junk1(30),junk1(30),junk1(30),junk1(21),mdist(6),vol1(6),vol2(6),vol3(6),vol4(6),vol5(6),vol6(6),vol7(6),vol8(6),vol9(6),vol10(6),vol11(6),vol12(6),vol13(6),vol14(6),vol15(6),vol16(6)NODEO=tempnod.txt, format = TXT, include = junkn(1),n(6),x(11),y(11)PHASE=NODEMERGECentral Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201241junkn='N'ENDPHASEPHASE=LINKMERGE_zero=0junk1=0junks='S'junkp='P'fffff='{cm3pri}'/*;commented out 04/02/2012if(fffff=='SW')if(li.1.admclass==1 && li.1.district <13 && li.1.district>0)junkp='P';state systemelseif(li.1.district<13 && li.1.district>0)junkp='G';non-stateelsejunkp='U';out of stateendifelseif(fffff='OMS')if(li.1.admclass<6)junkp='P'elsejunkp='G'endifendif*/;commented out 04/02/2012jurisdic=' 'nhs=0fedfunc=li.1.fedfuncljunkb=' 'ctoll=0; =cartoll*10ttoll=0; =trktoll*10mdist = LI.1.DIST*1000moffpspd=li.1.offpspd*100mpeakspd=li.1.peakspd*100cap=li.1.{cm3capf}*{cm3kfact}loneway='1'; el_oneway changebcap=0bvol=0Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201242boffpspd=0bpeakspd=0blanes=0bterrain=0mpostspd=round(li.1.postspd)vol=@volff@trkvol=@trkff@vol1=@vol1s@vol2=@vol2s@vol3=@vol3s@vol4=@vol4s@vol5=@vol5s@vol6=@vol6s@vol7=@vol7s@vol8=@vol8s@vol9=@vol9s@vol10=@vol10s@vol11=@vol11s@vol12=@vol12s@vol13=@vol13s@vol14=@vol14s@vol15=@vol15s@vol16=@vol16s@ENDPHASEENDRUNaqmode='{cm3aqtype}'if(aqmode=='MOBILE')*copy {cm3effile.q} tempef.txt*N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\utils\postcms10.exe templnk.txt tempcms.txt N tempef.txt {cm3rmode}*del tempef.txtelse*N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\utils\postcms10.exe templnk.txt tempcms.txt N NONE {cm3rmode}endifif(aqmode=='MOVES')*copy {cm3effile.q} tempef.txtif(rrmode='NORMAL' && trkfff == 'NONE')then*N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\utils\movesnet.exe hourly.rpt tempef.txt cmstext.rpt {cm3aqfact}else*N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\utils\movesnet.exe hourly.rpt tempef.txt cmstext.rpt {cm3aqfact} 1{cm3tpce} 3endifCentral Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201243endifRUN PGM=NETWORKNETI[1]={cm3neti.q}LINKI[2]=tempcms.txt var=a,1-6,b,8-13,cVMT,97-111,cTRKVMT,113-128,cVOLPERLANE,130-137,cCONINDEX,139-146,cVCRATIO,148-155,cPEAKHOUR,157-160,cVHT,162-169,cCONGDELAY,171-178,cPHYSDELAY,180-187,cSPDLIMDELAY,189-196,cDELAYRATIO,198-205,cDIR1HRSEXCEED,229-232,cDIR2HRSEXCEED,234-237,cPKVMT,253-267,cEXCEEDVMT,269-283,cEXCEEDPKVMT,285-299,cLOS,317,1,,,1,select=(substr(record,1,1)!= 'A')NODEI[2]=tempnod.txt var=n,2-7, x,8-18, y,19-29NETO={cm3neto.q}MERGE RECORD=FENDRUNiiztype='{cm3iztype}'if(iiztype=='TEXT')*copy {cm3ifile.q} tempif.txtelseif(iiztype=='OMSTABLE')RUN PGM=MATRIXFILEO PRINTO[1] = tempif.txtFILEI MATI[1] = {cm3ifile.q}MW[1]=mi.1.5+mi.1.10+mi.1.15jloopif(j=i)print list=i(4.0),mw[1][j](6.0),printo=1endifendjloopENDRUNendifif(iiztype!='NONE')*copy {cm3afile.q} tempaf.txtif(aqmode=='MOBILE')*copy {cm3ieffile.q} tempief.txt*N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\utils\intracal2.exe tempif.txt summary.rpt tempaf.txt tempief.txt*del tempief.txtCentral Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201244elseif(aqmode=='MOVES')*N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\utils\movesintra.exe tempif.txt tempef.txt tempaf.txt cmstext.rpt{cm3aqfact}*del tempef.txtendif*del tempaf.txt*DEL tempif.txtendifif(aqmode=='MOVES')*copy {cm3ieffile.q} tempief.txt*copy {cm3vfile.q} tempveh.txt*N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\utils\movesveh.exe tempveh.txt tempief.txt cmstext.rpt {cm3aqfact}*del tempveh.txt*del tempief.txtendifif(aqmode=='MOVES')*echo MOVES BASED EMISSIONS REPORT > tempcom.txtelseif(aqmode=='MOBILE')*echo MOBILE BASED EMISSIONS REPORT >> tempcom.txtelse*echo NO EMISSIONS ANALYSIS CONDUCTED >> tempcom.txtendif*echo {cm3aqcom} >> tempcom.txt*echo Loaded Network: {cm3neti} >> tempcom.txt*echo Network Emission Factors: {cm3effile} >> tempcom.txtif(aqmode=='MOVES')*echo Vehicle Emission Factors: {cm3ieffile} >> tempcom.txt*echo Vehicle Population : {cm3vfile} >> tempcom.txtelse*echo Intrazonal Emission Factors: {cm3ieffile} >> tempcom.txtendif*echo Intrazonal Trips : {cm3ifile} >> tempcom.txt*echo Area File (sq mi): {cm3afile} >> tempcom.txt*echo Volume Field Used: {cm3volf} >> tempcom.txt*echo Truck Volume Field Used: {cm3trkf} >> tempcom.txt*echo Capacity Field Used: {cm3capf} >> tempcom.txt*echo ----------------------------------------- >> tempcom.txtCentral Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201245*copy /B tempcom.txt+cmstext.rpt {cm3rpto.q}*if exist {cm3sumo.q} del {cm3sumo.q}*rename summary.rpt {cm3sumo.q}*del tempcom.txt*del cmstext.rpt*DEL tempnod.txt*DEL templnk.txt*DEL tempcms.txthhro=rightstr('{cm3hro}',4)if(hhro=='NONE')*del hourly.rptelse*if exist {cm3hro.q} del {cm3hro.q}*rename hourly.rpt {cm3hro.q}endifCentral Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201246Appendix B – MORPC Travel Demand Model Emission Run Report for 2002MOVES BASED EMISSIONS REPORTOzone Analysis with MOVES - MORPCLoaded Network: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\networks\2002\AQ_asgn_2002.netNetwork Emission Factors: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\2002MORPC_ozone_3source_rpd.csvVehicle Emission Factors: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\2002MORPC_ozone_3source_rpv.csvVehicle Population : N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\Source_Type_Pop_2002_MORPC_on-Model.csvIntrazonal Trips : N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\intra_z\county\FRA02.txtArea File (sq mi): N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\area_taz\TAZ_areain.txtVolume Field Used: VOL24_TOTTruck Volume Field Used: NONECapacity Field Used: CAP24-----------------------------------------CMS/AQ REPORTPOSTCMS10, UPDATED DEC 2009, GTGDATE:09/13/2012 TIME:12:33:52PARAMETER FILE DUMP (DAILY.DAT FILE)HOUR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1415 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23PCTADTURB FWY 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 2.2 5.2 7.3 6.4 5.2 4.9 5.1 5.3 5.5 6.17.2 8.0 7.9 5.8 4.2 3.4 2.9 2.2 1.5URB ART 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.5 3.5 5.7 5.5 5.1 5.3 6.2 6.5 6.4 6.87.6 8.2 8.1 6.2 4.8 4.0 3.0 1.9 1.3RUR FWY 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.2 3.7 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.6 5.7 6.0 6.57.1 7.5 7.0 5.6 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.0RUR ART 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.0 2.4 4.8 6.2 5.5 5.3 5.5 5.8 6.0 6.0 6.77.6 8.1 7.7 5.6 4.2 3.5 2.8 1.9 1.3PCTADT TRKURB FWY 2.1 1.9 1.8 2.0 2.4 3.0 3.9 4.6 5.3 6.0 6.3 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.35.8 5.2 4.6 4.1 3.7 3.4 3.1 2.8 2.4URB ART 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.3 3.9 5.9 6.9 6.7 7.1 7.6 7.4 7.2 7.47.2 6.0 5.0 3.7 2.8 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.3RUR FWY 2.6 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.6 3.1 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.1 5.6 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.85.6 5.3 4.9 4.6 4.3 4.0 3.8 3.5 3.1RUR ART 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.6 2.2 3.0 4.2 5.3 6.1 6.7 7.0 7.1 7.0 6.9 6.86.3 5.5 4.6 3.8 3.1 2.6 2.3 2.1 1.7PCTDIRURB FWY 38 40 40 46 56 64 70 70 68 62 58 52 52 52 5046 38 38 46 52 46 42 42 40URB ART 44 46 44 48 54 62 66 68 64 56 54 52 50 50 5046 40 38 46 52 48 46 46 46RUR FWY 44 46 48 54 60 68 68 64 58 54 52 50 50 52 5248 42 40 44 48 48 44 46 44RUR ART 40 42 44 48 58 66 72 68 60 56 54 50 50 50 5046 40 38 46 50 46 44 44 44Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201247LOS E VC 0 0.625 1.25 1.875 2.5 3.125 3.75 4.375 5 5.625 6.25 6.875 7.5 8.125 8.759.375 10 10.625 11.25 11.875 12.5 13.125 13.75 14.375SPEEDVCcurve1 75 75 75 75 75 75 74.9 74.8 74.6 74.2 73.5 72.3 70.5 67.8 64.259.5 54 47.7 41.2 34.9 28.9 23.7 19.2 15.5curve2 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 69.9 69.8 69.6 69.2 68.4 67.1 65.1 62.258.2 53 47 40.5 33.9 27.7 22.2 17.6 13.8curve3 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 64.9 64.8 64.4 63.8 62.6 60.557 52 45.4 37.8 29.9 22.7 16.7 12.1 8.6curve4 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.8 59.6 59.1 58.2 56.754.3 50.8 46.1 40.3 33.8 27.3 21.3 16.2 12.2curve5 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.9 54.7 54.3 53.652.3 50 46.5 41.5 35.3 28.5 21.9 16.1 11.5curve6 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.8 59.7 59.4 59.1 58.5 57.756.5 55 53.1 50.7 47.9 44.7 41.1 37.3 33.4curve7 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.9 54.9 54.7 54.5 54.2 53.8 53.152.2 50.9 49.3 47.3 44.9 42.1 39 35.7 32.2curve8 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.9 49.8 49.6 49.4 49 48.547.7 46.7 45.4 43.8 41.8 39.5 36.8 33.9 30.9curve9 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 44.9 44.8 44.7 44.4 44.1 43.643 42.1 40.9 39.4 37.6 35.5 33.1 30.5 27.8curve10 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.7 49.4 49 48.4 47.5 46.5 45.1 43.5 41.739.6 37.3 34.9 32.4 29.8 27.3 24.9 22.6 20.4curve11 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.7 49.4 48.9 48 46.7 44.9 42.5 39.6 36.232.6 28.7 25 21.4 18.2 15.3 12.9 10.8 9curve12 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.6 49.1 48.2 46.8 44.5 41.4 37.5 32.928 23.1 18.7 14.9 11.8 9.2 7.2 5.7 4.5curve13 40 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.5 39.2 38.6 37.8 36.7 35.3 33.531.4 29 26.4 23.7 21.1 18.5 16.1 13.9 12curve14 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.6 39.1 38.5 37.5 36.1 34.3 32.1 29.426.5 23.5 20.5 17.7 15.1 12.8 10.7 9 7.6curve15 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.7 39.4 38.8 37.9 36.5 34.7 32.3 29.5 26.423.2 20 17 14.3 11.9 9.9 8.2 6.8 5.6curve16 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.8 34.5 34 33.2 32.1 30.5 28.5 26.1 23.520.6 17.9 15.2 12.8 10.7 8.9 7.4 6.1 5.1curve17 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.7 34.4 33.9 33.1 32 30.3 28.3 25.8 23.120.3 17.5 14.9 12.5 10.4 8.6 7.2 5.9 4.9curve18 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.6 34.2 33.5 32.4 30.9 28.8 26.3 23.4 20.417.4 14.6 12.1 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.6curve19 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.8 29.5 29 28.2 27.1 25.6 23.7 21.5 19.116.6 14.2 12 10 8.3 6.8 5.6 4.6 3.8curve20 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.4 28.9 28.1 26.9 25.3 23.4 21.1 18.616.1 13.6 11.4 9.5 7.8 6.4 5.3 4.3 3.6curve21 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.3 28.7 27.7 26.2 24.4 22.1 19.6 1714.4 12 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.6 2.9VC RATIO TO LOS CONVERSION (VALUE SHOWN IS LOWER LIMIT FOR THAT LOS)(URBAN ROADS USE SPEED BREAKS BELOW FOR LOS DETERMINATION) (ALL USETHE BASE VC'S TO DETERMINE EXCEEDANCE)BASE RUR2 FWYA 0.00 0.00 0.00B 0.30 0.00 0.25Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201248C 0.50 0.10 0.40D 0.70 0.30 0.60E 0.90 0.50 0.80F 1.00 1.00 1.00F+ 1.10 1.10 1.10F++ 1.30 1.30 1.30SPEED VC RATIO BREAKS FOR URBAN STREETS (HIGHEST SPEED FOR GIVEN LOS & FF SPEED)FFS B C D E F>47 42. 34. 27. 21. 16.>37 35. 28. 22. 17. 13.>32 30. 24. 18. 14. 10.<33 25. 19. 13. 9. 7.LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLD BY AREANUM LOS DEFINITION1 F CINCINNATI,CLEVELAND,COLUMBUS CENTRAL MPO COUNTIES (CUY,FRA,HAM)2 E OTHER TMA MPOS (AKRON,CANTON,DAYTON,TOLEDO,YOUNGSTOWN + NON-CENTRAL COUNTIES FROM 1)3 E OTHER MPOS & PARTS OF AREAS 1 & 2 OUTSIDE URBANIZED AREA4 E RURAL NON MPO COUNTIESPEAK SPREADING MODEL INFO (SET MAX ITERATIONS TO 0 TO DISABLE PEAK SPREADING)MAX VC RATIO FWY: 1.30MAX VC RATIO ART: 1.30MAX ITERATIONS : 1000TRUCK PCE: 2.0AQ SEASON FACTOR: 1.08MODEL CLASS PARAMETERS (MAX 4 CLASSES, HOURS 0-23 W/ NO OVERLAP IN CLASS, ALLOCATE ENTIRE CLASS AS TRUCK(1) OR NOT(0))CLS TRK 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00CLS BEG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00CLS END 23 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00CLS NUM 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00MOVES NETWORK LINK EMISSIONS OUTPUTCOUNTY MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5DEL JULY 4306883. 9.1051 20.5004 0.0000 0.0000ERI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000FAI JULY 1417727. 2.2644 5.7411 0.0000 0.0000FAY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000FRA JULY 29280512. 100.7557 186.8220 0.0000 0.0000FUL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GAL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GEA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GRE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201249GUE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAM JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HEN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HIG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HOC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HOL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HUR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JAC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JEF JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000KNO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LAK JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LAW JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LIC JULY 5179005. 12.5632 26.7256 0.0000 0.0000LOG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LOR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LUC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MAD JULY 942926. 2.1289 4.7316 0.0000 0.0000MAH JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MED JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MEG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MER JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MIA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MOE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MOT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MRG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MRW JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MUS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000NOB JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000OTT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PAU JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PER JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PIC JULY 783343. 1.0289 2.8963 0.0000 0.0000PIK JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000POR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PRE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PUT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000RIC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ROS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SCI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SEN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SHE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000STA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SUM JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000TRU JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000TUS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000UNI JULY 1336487. 3.1306 6.7589 0.0000 0.0000Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201250VAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000VIN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WAS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WAY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WIL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WOO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WYA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000XXX JULY 32247. 0.0305 0.0978 0.0000 0.0000TOT JULY 43273344. 130.9436 254.2020 0.0000 0.0000MOVES INTRAZONAL EMISSIONS OUTPUTFRANKLIN COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 22899. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 22899. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 24731. 0.0361 0.0975 0.0000 0.0000DELAWARE COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 3706. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 3706. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 4003. 0.0058 0.0158 0.0000 0.0000LICKING COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 13104. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 13104. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 14152. 0.0207 0.0558 0.0000 0.0000FAIRFIELD COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 6751. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 6751. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 7291. 0.0107 0.0287 0.0000 0.0000MADISON COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 1505. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 1505. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 1625. 0.0024 0.0064 0.0000 0.0000MOVES VEHICLE BASED EMISSIONS OUTPUTMONTH VEHICLES HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 1599158. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 1599158. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 1727091. 57.3172 50.9247 0.0000 0.0000Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201251Appendix C – MORPC Travel Demand Model Emission Run Report for 2006MOVES BASED EMISSIONS REPORTOzone Analysis with MOVES - MORPCLoaded Network: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\networks\2006\AQ_asgn_2006.netNetwork Emission Factors: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\2006MORPC_ozone_3source_rpd.csvVehicle Emission Factors: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\2006MORPC_ozone_3source_rpv.csvVehicle Population : N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\Source_Type_Pop_2006_MORPC_on-Model.csvIntrazonal Trips : N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\intra_z\county\FRA06.txtArea File (sq mi): N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\area_taz\TAZ_areain.txtVolume Field Used: VOL24_TOTTruck Volume Field Used: NONECapacity Field Used: CAP24-----------------------------------------CMS/AQ REPORTPOSTCMS10, UPDATED DEC 2009, GTGDATE:09/13/2012 TIME:07:29:47PARAMETER FILE DUMP (DAILY.DAT FILE)HOUR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1415 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23PCTADTURB FWY 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 2.2 5.2 7.3 6.4 5.2 4.9 5.1 5.3 5.5 6.17.2 8.0 7.9 5.8 4.2 3.4 2.9 2.2 1.5URB ART 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.5 3.5 5.7 5.5 5.1 5.3 6.2 6.5 6.4 6.87.6 8.2 8.1 6.2 4.8 4.0 3.0 1.9 1.3RUR FWY 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.2 3.7 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.6 5.7 6.0 6.57.1 7.5 7.0 5.6 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.0RUR ART 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.0 2.4 4.8 6.2 5.5 5.3 5.5 5.8 6.0 6.0 6.77.6 8.1 7.7 5.6 4.2 3.5 2.8 1.9 1.3PCTADT TRKURB FWY 2.1 1.9 1.8 2.0 2.4 3.0 3.9 4.6 5.3 6.0 6.3 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.35.8 5.2 4.6 4.1 3.7 3.4 3.1 2.8 2.4URB ART 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.3 3.9 5.9 6.9 6.7 7.1 7.6 7.4 7.2 7.47.2 6.0 5.0 3.7 2.8 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.3RUR FWY 2.6 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.6 3.1 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.1 5.6 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.85.6 5.3 4.9 4.6 4.3 4.0 3.8 3.5 3.1RUR ART 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.6 2.2 3.0 4.2 5.3 6.1 6.7 7.0 7.1 7.0 6.9 6.86.3 5.5 4.6 3.8 3.1 2.6 2.3 2.1 1.7PCTDIRURB FWY 38 40 40 46 56 64 70 70 68 62 58 52 52 52 5046 38 38 46 52 46 42 42 40URB ART 44 46 44 48 54 62 66 68 64 56 54 52 50 50 5046 40 38 46 52 48 46 46 46RUR FWY 44 46 48 54 60 68 68 64 58 54 52 50 50 52 5248 42 40 44 48 48 44 46 44RUR ART 40 42 44 48 58 66 72 68 60 56 54 50 50 50 5046 40 38 46 50 46 44 44 44Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201252LOS E VC 0 0.625 1.25 1.875 2.5 3.125 3.75 4.375 5 5.625 6.25 6.875 7.5 8.125 8.759.375 10 10.625 11.25 11.875 12.5 13.125 13.75 14.375SPEEDVCcurve1 75 75 75 75 75 75 74.9 74.8 74.6 74.2 73.5 72.3 70.5 67.8 64.259.5 54 47.7 41.2 34.9 28.9 23.7 19.2 15.5curve2 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 69.9 69.8 69.6 69.2 68.4 67.1 65.1 62.258.2 53 47 40.5 33.9 27.7 22.2 17.6 13.8curve3 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 64.9 64.8 64.4 63.8 62.6 60.557 52 45.4 37.8 29.9 22.7 16.7 12.1 8.6curve4 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.8 59.6 59.1 58.2 56.754.3 50.8 46.1 40.3 33.8 27.3 21.3 16.2 12.2curve5 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.9 54.7 54.3 53.652.3 50 46.5 41.5 35.3 28.5 21.9 16.1 11.5curve6 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.8 59.7 59.4 59.1 58.5 57.756.5 55 53.1 50.7 47.9 44.7 41.1 37.3 33.4curve7 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.9 54.9 54.7 54.5 54.2 53.8 53.152.2 50.9 49.3 47.3 44.9 42.1 39 35.7 32.2curve8 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.9 49.8 49.6 49.4 49 48.547.7 46.7 45.4 43.8 41.8 39.5 36.8 33.9 30.9curve9 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 44.9 44.8 44.7 44.4 44.1 43.643 42.1 40.9 39.4 37.6 35.5 33.1 30.5 27.8curve10 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.7 49.4 49 48.4 47.5 46.5 45.1 43.5 41.739.6 37.3 34.9 32.4 29.8 27.3 24.9 22.6 20.4curve11 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.7 49.4 48.9 48 46.7 44.9 42.5 39.6 36.232.6 28.7 25 21.4 18.2 15.3 12.9 10.8 9curve12 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.6 49.1 48.2 46.8 44.5 41.4 37.5 32.928 23.1 18.7 14.9 11.8 9.2 7.2 5.7 4.5curve13 40 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.5 39.2 38.6 37.8 36.7 35.3 33.531.4 29 26.4 23.7 21.1 18.5 16.1 13.9 12curve14 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.6 39.1 38.5 37.5 36.1 34.3 32.1 29.426.5 23.5 20.5 17.7 15.1 12.8 10.7 9 7.6curve15 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.7 39.4 38.8 37.9 36.5 34.7 32.3 29.5 26.423.2 20 17 14.3 11.9 9.9 8.2 6.8 5.6curve16 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.8 34.5 34 33.2 32.1 30.5 28.5 26.1 23.520.6 17.9 15.2 12.8 10.7 8.9 7.4 6.1 5.1curve17 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.7 34.4 33.9 33.1 32 30.3 28.3 25.8 23.120.3 17.5 14.9 12.5 10.4 8.6 7.2 5.9 4.9curve18 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.6 34.2 33.5 32.4 30.9 28.8 26.3 23.4 20.417.4 14.6 12.1 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.6curve19 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.8 29.5 29 28.2 27.1 25.6 23.7 21.5 19.116.6 14.2 12 10 8.3 6.8 5.6 4.6 3.8curve20 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.4 28.9 28.1 26.9 25.3 23.4 21.1 18.616.1 13.6 11.4 9.5 7.8 6.4 5.3 4.3 3.6curve21 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.3 28.7 27.7 26.2 24.4 22.1 19.6 1714.4 12 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.6 2.9VC RATIO TO LOS CONVERSION (VALUE SHOWN IS LOWER LIMIT FOR THAT LOS)(URBAN ROADS USE SPEED BREAKS BELOW FOR LOS DETERMINATION) (ALL USETHE BASE VC'S TO DETERMINE EXCEEDANCE)BASE RUR2 FWYA 0.00 0.00 0.00Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201253B 0.30 0.00 0.25C 0.50 0.10 0.40D 0.70 0.30 0.60E 0.90 0.50 0.80F 1.00 1.00 1.00F+ 1.10 1.10 1.10F++ 1.30 1.30 1.30SPEED VC RATIO BREAKS FOR URBAN STREETS (HIGHEST SPEED FOR GIVEN LOS & FF SPEED)FFS B C D E F>47 42. 34. 27. 21. 16.>37 35. 28. 22. 17. 13.>32 30. 24. 18. 14. 10.<33 25. 19. 13. 9. 7.LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLD BY AREANUM LOS DEFINITION1 F CINCINNATI,CLEVELAND,COLUMBUS CENTRAL MPO COUNTIES (CUY,FRA,HAM)2 E OTHER TMA MPOS (AKRON,CANTON,DAYTON,TOLEDO,YOUNGSTOWN + NON-CENTRAL COUNTIES FROM 1)3 E OTHER MPOS & PARTS OF AREAS 1 & 2 OUTSIDE URBANIZED AREA4 E RURAL NON MPO COUNTIESPEAK SPREADING MODEL INFO (SET MAX ITERATIONS TO 0 TO DISABLE PEAK SPREADING)MAX VC RATIO FWY: 1.30MAX VC RATIO ART: 1.30MAX ITERATIONS : 1000TRUCK PCE: 2.0AQ SEASON FACTOR: 1.08MODEL CLASS PARAMETERS (MAX 4 CLASSES, HOURS 0-23 W/ NO OVERLAP IN CLASS, ALLOCATE ENTIRE CLASS AS TRUCK(1) ORNOT(0))CLS TRK 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00CLS BEG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00CLS END 23 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00CLS NUM 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00MOVES NETWORK LINK EMISSIONS OUTPUTCOUNTY MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5ADA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ALL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ASD JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ATB JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ATH JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000AUG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000BEL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000BRO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201254BUT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CHP JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CLA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CLE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CLI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000COL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000COS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CRA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CUY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000DAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000DEF JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000DEL JULY 4812232. 6.2135 16.8636 0.0000 0.0000ERI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000FAI JULY 1770176. 2.0425 5.8175 0.0000 0.0000FAY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000FRA JULY 32708992. 70.2347 156.0723 0.0000 0.0000FUL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GAL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GEA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GRE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GUE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAM JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HEN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HIG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HOC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HOL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HUR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JAC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JEF JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000KNO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LAK JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LAW JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LIC JULY 5199066. 8.2578 20.7311 0.0000 0.0000LOG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LOR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LUC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MAD JULY 868393. 1.0000 2.8513 0.0000 0.0000MAH JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MED JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MEG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MER JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MIA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MOE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MOT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MRG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MRW JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201255MUS JULY 125146. 0.1424 0.4038 0.0000 0.0000NOB JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000OTT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PAU JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PER JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PIC JULY 1009566. 1.0398 3.1643 0.0000 0.0000PIK JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000POR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PRE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PUT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000RIC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ROS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SCI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SEN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SHE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000STA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SUM JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000TRU JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000TUS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000UNI JULY 1565270. 2.4668 6.2493 0.0000 0.0000VAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000VIN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WAS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WAY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WIL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WOO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WYA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000XXX JULY 39376. 0.0328 0.1094 0.0000 0.0000TOT JULY 48081208. 91.3737 212.1500 0.0000 0.0000MOVES INTRAZONAL EMISSIONS OUTPUTFRANKLIN COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 24478. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 24478. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 26436. 0.0264 0.0826 0.0000 0.0000DELAWARE COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 4674. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 4674. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 5047. 0.0050 0.0158 0.0000 0.0000LICKING COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 10689. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 10689. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 11544. 0.0115 0.0360 0.0000 0.0000FAIRFIELD COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 6809. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201256APRIL 6809. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 7354. 0.0073 0.0230 0.0000 0.0000MADISON COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 1326. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 1326. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 1432. 0.0014 0.0045 0.0000 0.0000MOVES VEHICLE BASED EMISSIONS OUTPUTMONTH VEHICLES HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 1707692. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 1707692. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 1844307. 55.5444 52.7627 0.0000 0.0000Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201257Appendix D – MORPC Travel Demand Model Emission Run Report for 2012MOVES BASED EMISSIONS REPORTOzone Analysis with MOVES - MORPCLoaded Network: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\networks\2012\AQ_asgn_2012.netNetwork Emission Factors: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\2012MORPC_ozone_3source_rpd.csvVehicle Emission Factors: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\2012MORPC_ozone_3source_rpv.csvVehicle Population : N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\Source_Type_Pop_2012_MORPC_on-Model.csvIntrazonal Trips : N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\intra_z\county\FRA12.txtArea File (sq mi): N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\area_taz\TAZ_areain.txtVolume Field Used: VOL24_TOTTruck Volume Field Used: NONECapacity Field Used: CAP24-----------------------------------------CMS/AQ REPORTPOSTCMS10, UPDATED DEC 2009, GTGDATE:09/13/2012 TIME:15:13:00PARAMETER FILE DUMP (DAILY.DAT FILE)HOUR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1415 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23PCTADTURB FWY 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 2.2 5.2 7.3 6.4 5.2 4.9 5.1 5.3 5.5 6.17.2 8.0 7.9 5.8 4.2 3.4 2.9 2.2 1.5URB ART 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.5 3.5 5.7 5.5 5.1 5.3 6.2 6.5 6.4 6.87.6 8.2 8.1 6.2 4.8 4.0 3.0 1.9 1.3RUR FWY 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.2 3.7 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.6 5.7 6.0 6.57.1 7.5 7.0 5.6 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.0RUR ART 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.0 2.4 4.8 6.2 5.5 5.3 5.5 5.8 6.0 6.0 6.77.6 8.1 7.7 5.6 4.2 3.5 2.8 1.9 1.3PCTADT TRKURB FWY 2.1 1.9 1.8 2.0 2.4 3.0 3.9 4.6 5.3 6.0 6.3 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.35.8 5.2 4.6 4.1 3.7 3.4 3.1 2.8 2.4URB ART 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.3 3.9 5.9 6.9 6.7 7.1 7.6 7.4 7.2 7.47.2 6.0 5.0 3.7 2.8 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.3RUR FWY 2.6 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.6 3.1 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.1 5.6 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.85.6 5.3 4.9 4.6 4.3 4.0 3.8 3.5 3.1RUR ART 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.6 2.2 3.0 4.2 5.3 6.1 6.7 7.0 7.1 7.0 6.9 6.86.3 5.5 4.6 3.8 3.1 2.6 2.3 2.1 1.7PCTDIRURB FWY 38 40 40 46 56 64 70 70 68 62 58 52 52 52 5046 38 38 46 52 46 42 42 40URB ART 44 46 44 48 54 62 66 68 64 56 54 52 50 50 5046 40 38 46 52 48 46 46 46RUR FWY 44 46 48 54 60 68 68 64 58 54 52 50 50 52 5248 42 40 44 48 48 44 46 44RUR ART 40 42 44 48 58 66 72 68 60 56 54 50 50 50 5046 40 38 46 50 46 44 44 44Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201258LOS E VC 0 0.625 1.25 1.875 2.5 3.125 3.75 4.375 5 5.625 6.25 6.875 7.5 8.125 8.759.375 10 10.625 11.25 11.875 12.5 13.125 13.75 14.375SPEEDVCcurve1 75 75 75 75 75 75 74.9 74.8 74.6 74.2 73.5 72.3 70.5 67.8 64.259.5 54 47.7 41.2 34.9 28.9 23.7 19.2 15.5curve2 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 69.9 69.8 69.6 69.2 68.4 67.1 65.1 62.258.2 53 47 40.5 33.9 27.7 22.2 17.6 13.8curve3 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 64.9 64.8 64.4 63.8 62.6 60.557 52 45.4 37.8 29.9 22.7 16.7 12.1 8.6curve4 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.8 59.6 59.1 58.2 56.754.3 50.8 46.1 40.3 33.8 27.3 21.3 16.2 12.2curve5 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.9 54.7 54.3 53.652.3 50 46.5 41.5 35.3 28.5 21.9 16.1 11.5curve6 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.8 59.7 59.4 59.1 58.5 57.756.5 55 53.1 50.7 47.9 44.7 41.1 37.3 33.4curve7 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.9 54.9 54.7 54.5 54.2 53.8 53.152.2 50.9 49.3 47.3 44.9 42.1 39 35.7 32.2curve8 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.9 49.8 49.6 49.4 49 48.547.7 46.7 45.4 43.8 41.8 39.5 36.8 33.9 30.9curve9 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 44.9 44.8 44.7 44.4 44.1 43.643 42.1 40.9 39.4 37.6 35.5 33.1 30.5 27.8curve10 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.7 49.4 49 48.4 47.5 46.5 45.1 43.5 41.739.6 37.3 34.9 32.4 29.8 27.3 24.9 22.6 20.4curve11 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.7 49.4 48.9 48 46.7 44.9 42.5 39.6 36.232.6 28.7 25 21.4 18.2 15.3 12.9 10.8 9curve12 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.6 49.1 48.2 46.8 44.5 41.4 37.5 32.928 23.1 18.7 14.9 11.8 9.2 7.2 5.7 4.5curve13 40 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.5 39.2 38.6 37.8 36.7 35.3 33.531.4 29 26.4 23.7 21.1 18.5 16.1 13.9 12curve14 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.6 39.1 38.5 37.5 36.1 34.3 32.1 29.426.5 23.5 20.5 17.7 15.1 12.8 10.7 9 7.6curve15 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.7 39.4 38.8 37.9 36.5 34.7 32.3 29.5 26.423.2 20 17 14.3 11.9 9.9 8.2 6.8 5.6curve16 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.8 34.5 34 33.2 32.1 30.5 28.5 26.1 23.520.6 17.9 15.2 12.8 10.7 8.9 7.4 6.1 5.1curve17 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.7 34.4 33.9 33.1 32 30.3 28.3 25.8 23.120.3 17.5 14.9 12.5 10.4 8.6 7.2 5.9 4.9curve18 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.6 34.2 33.5 32.4 30.9 28.8 26.3 23.4 20.417.4 14.6 12.1 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.6curve19 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.8 29.5 29 28.2 27.1 25.6 23.7 21.5 19.116.6 14.2 12 10 8.3 6.8 5.6 4.6 3.8curve20 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.4 28.9 28.1 26.9 25.3 23.4 21.1 18.616.1 13.6 11.4 9.5 7.8 6.4 5.3 4.3 3.6curve21 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.3 28.7 27.7 26.2 24.4 22.1 19.6 1714.4 12 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.6 2.9VC RATIO TO LOS CONVERSION (VALUE SHOWN IS LOWER LIMIT FOR THAT LOS)(URBAN ROADS USE SPEED BREAKS BELOW FOR LOS DETERMINATION) (ALL USETHE BASE VC'S TO DETERMINE EXCEEDANCE)BASE RUR2 FWYA 0.00 0.00 0.00B 0.30 0.00 0.25Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201259C 0.50 0.10 0.40D 0.70 0.30 0.60E 0.90 0.50 0.80F 1.00 1.00 1.00F+ 1.10 1.10 1.10F++ 1.30 1.30 1.30SPEED VC RATIO BREAKS FOR URBAN STREETS (HIGHEST SPEED FOR GIVEN LOS & FF SPEED)FFS B C D E F>47 42. 34. 27. 21. 16.>37 35. 28. 22. 17. 13.>32 30. 24. 18. 14. 10.<33 25. 19. 13. 9. 7.LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLD BY AREANUM LOS DEFINITION1 F CINCINNATI,CLEVELAND,COLUMBUS CENTRAL MPO COUNTIES (CUY,FRA,HAM)2 E OTHER TMA MPOS (AKRON,CANTON,DAYTON,TOLEDO,YOUNGSTOWN + NON-CENTRAL COUNTIES FROM 1)3 E OTHER MPOS & PARTS OF AREAS 1 & 2 OUTSIDE URBANIZED AREA4 E RURAL NON MPO COUNTIESPEAK SPREADING MODEL INFO (SET MAX ITERATIONS TO 0 TO DISABLE PEAK SPREADING)MAX VC RATIO FWY: 1.30MAX VC RATIO ART: 1.30MAX ITERATIONS : 1000TRUCK PCE: 2.0AQ SEASON FACTOR: 1.08MODEL CLASS PARAMETERS (MAX 4 CLASSES, HOURS 0-23 W/ NO OVERLAP IN CLASS, ALLOCATE ENTIRE CLASS AS TRUCK(1) OR NOT(0))CLS TRK 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00CLS BEG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00CLS END 23 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00CLS NUM 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00MOVES NETWORK LINK EMISSIONS OUTPUTCOUNTY MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5ADA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ALL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ASD JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ATB JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ATH JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000AUG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000BEL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000BRO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000BUT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201260CAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CHP JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CLA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CLE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CLI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000COL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000COS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CRA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CUY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000DAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000DEF JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000DEL JULY 5578098. 3.1299 10.3512 0.0000 0.0000ERI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000FAI JULY 1828928. 0.9712 3.2728 0.0000 0.0000FAY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000FRA JULY 33228732. 30.4787 83.6261 0.0000 0.0000FUL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GAL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GEA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GRE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GUE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAM JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HEN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HIG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HOC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HOL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HUR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JAC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JEF JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000KNO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LAK JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LAW JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LIC JULY 5379881. 3.4650 10.8492 0.0000 0.0000LOG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LOR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LUC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MAD JULY 928855. 0.4713 1.6267 0.0000 0.0000MAH JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MED JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MEG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MER JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MIA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MOE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MOT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MRG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MRW JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MUS JULY 81020. 0.0401 0.1387 0.0000 0.0000Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201261NOB JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000OTT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PAU JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PER JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PIC JULY 845430. 0.3903 1.4099 0.0000 0.0000PIK JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000POR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PRE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PUT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000RIC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ROS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SCI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SEN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SHE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000STA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SUM JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000TRU JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000TUS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000UNI JULY 1657974. 1.1736 3.5966 0.0000 0.0000VAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000VIN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WAS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WAY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WIL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WOO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WYA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000XXX JULY 128857. 0.0450 0.1840 0.0000 0.0000TOT JULY 49643836. 40.1468 114.9978 0.0000 0.0000MOVES INTRAZONAL EMISSIONS OUTPUTFRANKLIN COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 25809. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 25809. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 27874. 0.0121 0.0459 0.0000 0.0000DELAWARE COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 5915. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 5915. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 6388. 0.0028 0.0105 0.0000 0.0000LICKING COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 13314. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 13314. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 14379. 0.0062 0.0237 0.0000 0.0000FAIRFIELD COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 6903. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 6903. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201262JULY 7455. 0.0032 0.0123 0.0000 0.0000MADISON COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 1305. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 1305. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 1410. 0.0006 0.0023 0.0000 0.0000MOVES VEHICLE BASED EMISSIONS OUTPUTMONTH VEHICLES HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 1871395. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 1871395. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 2021107. 40.8047 47.3824 0.0000 0.0000Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201263Appendix E – MORPC Travel Demand Model Emissions Run Report for 2020MOVES BASED EMISSIONS REPORTOzone Analysis with MOVES - MORPCLoaded Network: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\networks\2020\AQ_asgn_2020.netNetwork Emission Factors: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\2020MORPC_ozone_3source_rpd.csvVehicle Emission Factors: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\2020MORPC_ozone_3source_rpv.csvVehicle Population : N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\Source_Type_Pop_2020_MORPC_on-Model.csvIntrazonal Trips : N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\intra_z\county\FRA20.txtArea File (sq mi): N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\area_taz\TAZ_areain.txtVolume Field Used: VOL24_TOTTruck Volume Field Used: NONECapacity Field Used: CAP24-----------------------------------------CMS/AQ REPORTPOSTCMS10, UPDATED DEC 2009, GTGDATE:09/13/2012 TIME:07:34:55PARAMETER FILE DUMP (DAILY.DAT FILE)HOUR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1415 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23PCTADTURB FWY 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 2.2 5.2 7.3 6.4 5.2 4.9 5.1 5.3 5.5 6.17.2 8.0 7.9 5.8 4.2 3.4 2.9 2.2 1.5URB ART 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.5 3.5 5.7 5.5 5.1 5.3 6.2 6.5 6.4 6.87.6 8.2 8.1 6.2 4.8 4.0 3.0 1.9 1.3RUR FWY 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.2 3.7 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.6 5.7 6.0 6.57.1 7.5 7.0 5.6 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.0RUR ART 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.0 2.4 4.8 6.2 5.5 5.3 5.5 5.8 6.0 6.0 6.77.6 8.1 7.7 5.6 4.2 3.5 2.8 1.9 1.3PCTADT TRKURB FWY 2.1 1.9 1.8 2.0 2.4 3.0 3.9 4.6 5.3 6.0 6.3 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.35.8 5.2 4.6 4.1 3.7 3.4 3.1 2.8 2.4URB ART 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.3 3.9 5.9 6.9 6.7 7.1 7.6 7.4 7.2 7.47.2 6.0 5.0 3.7 2.8 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.3RUR FWY 2.6 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.6 3.1 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.1 5.6 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.85.6 5.3 4.9 4.6 4.3 4.0 3.8 3.5 3.1RUR ART 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.6 2.2 3.0 4.2 5.3 6.1 6.7 7.0 7.1 7.0 6.9 6.86.3 5.5 4.6 3.8 3.1 2.6 2.3 2.1 1.7PCTDIRURB FWY 38 40 40 46 56 64 70 70 68 62 58 52 52 52 5046 38 38 46 52 46 42 42 40URB ART 44 46 44 48 54 62 66 68 64 56 54 52 50 50 5046 40 38 46 52 48 46 46 46RUR FWY 44 46 48 54 60 68 68 64 58 54 52 50 50 52 5248 42 40 44 48 48 44 46 44RUR ART 40 42 44 48 58 66 72 68 60 56 54 50 50 50 5046 40 38 46 50 46 44 44 44Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201264LOS E VC 0 0.625 1.25 1.875 2.5 3.125 3.75 4.375 5 5.625 6.25 6.875 7.5 8.125 8.759.375 10 10.625 11.25 11.875 12.5 13.125 13.75 14.375SPEEDVCcurve1 75 75 75 75 75 75 74.9 74.8 74.6 74.2 73.5 72.3 70.5 67.8 64.259.5 54 47.7 41.2 34.9 28.9 23.7 19.2 15.5curve2 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 69.9 69.8 69.6 69.2 68.4 67.1 65.1 62.258.2 53 47 40.5 33.9 27.7 22.2 17.6 13.8curve3 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 64.9 64.8 64.4 63.8 62.6 60.557 52 45.4 37.8 29.9 22.7 16.7 12.1 8.6curve4 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.8 59.6 59.1 58.2 56.754.3 50.8 46.1 40.3 33.8 27.3 21.3 16.2 12.2curve5 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.9 54.7 54.3 53.652.3 50 46.5 41.5 35.3 28.5 21.9 16.1 11.5curve6 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.8 59.7 59.4 59.1 58.5 57.756.5 55 53.1 50.7 47.9 44.7 41.1 37.3 33.4curve7 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.9 54.9 54.7 54.5 54.2 53.8 53.152.2 50.9 49.3 47.3 44.9 42.1 39 35.7 32.2curve8 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.9 49.8 49.6 49.4 49 48.547.7 46.7 45.4 43.8 41.8 39.5 36.8 33.9 30.9curve9 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 44.9 44.8 44.7 44.4 44.1 43.643 42.1 40.9 39.4 37.6 35.5 33.1 30.5 27.8curve10 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.7 49.4 49 48.4 47.5 46.5 45.1 43.5 41.739.6 37.3 34.9 32.4 29.8 27.3 24.9 22.6 20.4curve11 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.7 49.4 48.9 48 46.7 44.9 42.5 39.6 36.232.6 28.7 25 21.4 18.2 15.3 12.9 10.8 9curve12 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.6 49.1 48.2 46.8 44.5 41.4 37.5 32.928 23.1 18.7 14.9 11.8 9.2 7.2 5.7 4.5curve13 40 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.5 39.2 38.6 37.8 36.7 35.3 33.531.4 29 26.4 23.7 21.1 18.5 16.1 13.9 12curve14 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.6 39.1 38.5 37.5 36.1 34.3 32.1 29.426.5 23.5 20.5 17.7 15.1 12.8 10.7 9 7.6curve15 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.7 39.4 38.8 37.9 36.5 34.7 32.3 29.5 26.423.2 20 17 14.3 11.9 9.9 8.2 6.8 5.6curve16 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.8 34.5 34 33.2 32.1 30.5 28.5 26.1 23.520.6 17.9 15.2 12.8 10.7 8.9 7.4 6.1 5.1curve17 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.7 34.4 33.9 33.1 32 30.3 28.3 25.8 23.120.3 17.5 14.9 12.5 10.4 8.6 7.2 5.9 4.9curve18 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.6 34.2 33.5 32.4 30.9 28.8 26.3 23.4 20.417.4 14.6 12.1 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.6curve19 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.8 29.5 29 28.2 27.1 25.6 23.7 21.5 19.116.6 14.2 12 10 8.3 6.8 5.6 4.6 3.8curve20 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.4 28.9 28.1 26.9 25.3 23.4 21.1 18.616.1 13.6 11.4 9.5 7.8 6.4 5.3 4.3 3.6curve21 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.3 28.7 27.7 26.2 24.4 22.1 19.6 1714.4 12 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.6 2.9VC RATIO TO LOS CONVERSION (VALUE SHOWN IS LOWER LIMIT FOR THAT LOS)(URBAN ROADS USE SPEED BREAKS BELOW FOR LOS DETERMINATION) (ALL USETHE BASE VC'S TO DETERMINE EXCEEDANCE)BASE RUR2 FWYA 0.00 0.00 0.00B 0.30 0.00 0.25Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201265C 0.50 0.10 0.40D 0.70 0.30 0.60E 0.90 0.50 0.80F 1.00 1.00 1.00F+ 1.10 1.10 1.10F++ 1.30 1.30 1.30SPEED VC RATIO BREAKS FOR URBAN STREETS (HIGHEST SPEEDFOR GIVEN LOS & FF SPEED)FFS B C D E F>47 42. 34. 27. 21. 16.>37 35. 28. 22. 17. 13.>32 30. 24. 18. 14. 10.<33 25. 19. 13. 9. 7.LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLD BY AREANUM LOS DEFINITION1 F CINCINNATI,CLEVELAND,COLUMBUSCENTRAL MPO COUNTIES (CUY,FRA,HAM)2 E OTHER TMA MPOS (AKRON,CANTON,DAYTON,TOLEDO,YOUNGSTOWN + NON-CENTRAL COUNTIES FROM 1)3 E OTHER MPOS & PARTS OF AREAS 1 & 2 OUTSIDE URBANIZED AREA4 E RURAL NON MPO COUNTIESPEAK SPREADING MODEL INFO (SET MAX ITERATIONS TO 0 TO DISABLE PEAK SPREADING)MAX VC RATIO FWY: 1.30MAX VC RATIO ART: 1.30MAX ITERATIONS : 1000TRUCK PCE: 2.0AQ SEASON FACTOR: 1.08MODEL CLASS PARAMETERS (MAX 4 CLASSES, HOURS 0-23 W/ NO OVERLAP IN CLASS, ALLOCATE ENTIRE CLASS AS TRUCK(1) OR NOT(0))CLS TRK 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00CLS BEG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00CLS END 23 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00CLS NUM 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00MOVES NETWORK LINK EMISSIONS OUTPUTCOUNTY MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5ADA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ALL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ASD JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ATB JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ATH JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000AUG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000BEL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000BRO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000BUT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201266CAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CHP JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CLA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CLE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CLI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000COL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000COS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CRA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CUY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000DAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000DEF JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000DEL JULY 6856806. 1.5382 4.4924 0.0000 0.0000ERI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000FAI JULY 2213755. 0.4771 1.4152 0.0000 0.0000FAY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000FRA JULY 36204300. 12.9738 31.7279 0.0000 0.0000FUL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GAL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GEA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GRE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GUE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAM JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HEN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HIG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HOC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HOL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HUR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JAC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JEF JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000KNO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LAK JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LAW JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LIC JULY 6287961. 1.6358 4.5266 0.0000 0.0000LOG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LOR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LUC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MAD JULY 1106322. 0.2266 0.6870 0.0000 0.0000MAH JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MED JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MEG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MER JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MIA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MOE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MOT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MRG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MRW JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MUS JULY 107030. 0.0235 0.0696 0.0000 0.0000Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201267NOB JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000OTT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PAU JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PER JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PIC JULY 997123. 0.1863 0.5916 0.0000 0.0000PIK JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000POR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PRE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PUT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000RIC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ROS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SCI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SEN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SHE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000STA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SUM JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000TRU JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000TUS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000UNI JULY 2184941. 0.6106 1.6676 0.0000 0.0000VAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000VIN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WAS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WAY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WIL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WOO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WYA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000XXX JULY 155643. 0.0216 0.0776 0.0000 0.0000TOT JULY 56097780. 17.6851 45.2416 0.0000 0.0000MOVES INTRAZONAL EMISSIONS OUTPUTFRANKLIN COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 27210. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 27210. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 29386. 0.0051 0.0170 0.0000 0.0000DELAWARE COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 7967. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 7967. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 8605. 0.0015 0.0050 0.0000 0.0000LICKING COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 15458. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 15458. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 16695. 0.0029 0.0096 0.0000 0.0000FAIRFIELD COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 9123. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 9123. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201268JULY 9852. 0.0017 0.0057 0.0000 0.0000MADISON COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 1587. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 1587. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 1714. 0.0003 0.0010 0.0000 0.0000MOVES VEHICLE BASED EMISSIONS OUTPUTMONTH VEHICLES HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 2089669. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 2089669. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 2256843. 25.7675 40.2006 0.0000 0.0000Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201269Appendix F – MORPC Travel Demand Model Emission Run Report for 2035MOVES BASED EMISSIONS REPORTOzone Analysis with MOVES - MORPCLoaded Network: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\networks\2035\AQ_asgn_2035.netNetwork Emission Factors: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\2035MORPC_ozone_3source_rpd.csvVehicle Emission Factors: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\2035MORPC_ozone_3source_rpv.csvVehicle Population : N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\Source_Type_Pop_2035_MORPC_on-Model.csvIntrazonal Trips : N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\intra_z\county\FRA35.txtArea File (sq mi): N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\area_taz\TAZ_areain.txtVolume Field Used: VOL24_TOTTruck Volume Field Used: NONECapacity Field Used: CAP24-----------------------------------------CMS/AQ REPORTPOSTCMS10, UPDATED DEC 2009, GTGDATE:09/13/2012 TIME:07:37:19PARAMETER FILE DUMP (DAILY.DAT FILE)HOUR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1415 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23PCTADTURB FWY 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 2.2 5.2 7.3 6.4 5.2 4.9 5.1 5.3 5.5 6.17.2 8.0 7.9 5.8 4.2 3.4 2.9 2.2 1.5URB ART 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.5 3.5 5.7 5.5 5.1 5.3 6.2 6.5 6.4 6.87.6 8.2 8.1 6.2 4.8 4.0 3.0 1.9 1.3RUR FWY 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.2 3.7 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.6 5.7 6.0 6.57.1 7.5 7.0 5.6 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.0RUR ART 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.0 2.4 4.8 6.2 5.5 5.3 5.5 5.8 6.0 6.0 6.77.6 8.1 7.7 5.6 4.2 3.5 2.8 1.9 1.3PCTADT TRKURB FWY 2.1 1.9 1.8 2.0 2.4 3.0 3.9 4.6 5.3 6.0 6.3 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.35.8 5.2 4.6 4.1 3.7 3.4 3.1 2.8 2.4URB ART 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.3 3.9 5.9 6.9 6.7 7.1 7.6 7.4 7.2 7.47.2 6.0 5.0 3.7 2.8 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.3RUR FWY 2.6 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.6 3.1 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.1 5.6 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.85.6 5.3 4.9 4.6 4.3 4.0 3.8 3.5 3.1RUR ART 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.6 2.2 3.0 4.2 5.3 6.1 6.7 7.0 7.1 7.0 6.9 6.86.3 5.5 4.6 3.8 3.1 2.6 2.3 2.1 1.7PCTDIRURB FWY 38 40 40 46 56 64 70 70 68 62 58 52 52 52 5046 38 38 46 52 46 42 42 40URB ART 44 46 44 48 54 62 66 68 64 56 54 52 50 50 5046 40 38 46 52 48 46 46 46RUR FWY 44 46 48 54 60 68 68 64 58 54 52 50 50 52 5248 42 40 44 48 48 44 46 44RUR ART 40 42 44 48 58 66 72 68 60 56 54 50 50 50 5046 40 38 46 50 46 44 44 44Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201270LOS E VC 0 0.625 1.25 1.875 2.5 3.125 3.75 4.375 5 5.625 6.25 6.875 7.5 8.125 8.759.375 10 10.625 11.25 11.875 12.5 13.125 13.75 14.375SPEEDVCcurve1 75 75 75 75 75 75 74.9 74.8 74.6 74.2 73.5 72.3 70.5 67.8 64.259.5 54 47.7 41.2 34.9 28.9 23.7 19.2 15.5curve2 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 69.9 69.8 69.6 69.2 68.4 67.1 65.1 62.258.2 53 47 40.5 33.9 27.7 22.2 17.6 13.8curve3 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 64.9 64.8 64.4 63.8 62.6 60.557 52 45.4 37.8 29.9 22.7 16.7 12.1 8.6curve4 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.8 59.6 59.1 58.2 56.754.3 50.8 46.1 40.3 33.8 27.3 21.3 16.2 12.2curve5 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.9 54.7 54.3 53.652.3 50 46.5 41.5 35.3 28.5 21.9 16.1 11.5curve6 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.8 59.7 59.4 59.1 58.5 57.756.5 55 53.1 50.7 47.9 44.7 41.1 37.3 33.4curve7 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.9 54.9 54.7 54.5 54.2 53.8 53.152.2 50.9 49.3 47.3 44.9 42.1 39 35.7 32.2curve8 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.9 49.8 49.6 49.4 49 48.547.7 46.7 45.4 43.8 41.8 39.5 36.8 33.9 30.9curve9 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 44.9 44.8 44.7 44.4 44.1 43.643 42.1 40.9 39.4 37.6 35.5 33.1 30.5 27.8curve10 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.7 49.4 49 48.4 47.5 46.5 45.1 43.5 41.739.6 37.3 34.9 32.4 29.8 27.3 24.9 22.6 20.4curve11 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.7 49.4 48.9 48 46.7 44.9 42.5 39.6 36.232.6 28.7 25 21.4 18.2 15.3 12.9 10.8 9curve12 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.6 49.1 48.2 46.8 44.5 41.4 37.5 32.928 23.1 18.7 14.9 11.8 9.2 7.2 5.7 4.5curve13 40 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.5 39.2 38.6 37.8 36.7 35.3 33.531.4 29 26.4 23.7 21.1 18.5 16.1 13.9 12curve14 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.6 39.1 38.5 37.5 36.1 34.3 32.1 29.426.5 23.5 20.5 17.7 15.1 12.8 10.7 9 7.6curve15 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.7 39.4 38.8 37.9 36.5 34.7 32.3 29.5 26.423.2 20 17 14.3 11.9 9.9 8.2 6.8 5.6curve16 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.8 34.5 34 33.2 32.1 30.5 28.5 26.1 23.520.6 17.9 15.2 12.8 10.7 8.9 7.4 6.1 5.1curve17 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.7 34.4 33.9 33.1 32 30.3 28.3 25.8 23.120.3 17.5 14.9 12.5 10.4 8.6 7.2 5.9 4.9curve18 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.6 34.2 33.5 32.4 30.9 28.8 26.3 23.4 20.417.4 14.6 12.1 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.6curve19 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.8 29.5 29 28.2 27.1 25.6 23.7 21.5 19.116.6 14.2 12 10 8.3 6.8 5.6 4.6 3.8curve20 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.4 28.9 28.1 26.9 25.3 23.4 21.1 18.616.1 13.6 11.4 9.5 7.8 6.4 5.3 4.3 3.6curve21 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.3 28.7 27.7 26.2 24.4 22.1 19.6 1714.4 12 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.6 2.9VC RATIO TO LOS CONVERSION (VALUE SHOWN IS LOWER LIMIT FOR THAT LOS)(URBAN ROADS USE SPEED BREAKS BELOW FOR LOS DETERMINATION) (ALL USETHE BASE VC'S TO DETERMINE EXCEEDANCE)BASE RUR2 FWYA 0.00 0.00 0.00B 0.30 0.00 0.25Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201271C 0.50 0.10 0.40D 0.70 0.30 0.60E 0.90 0.50 0.80F 1.00 1.00 1.00F+ 1.10 1.10 1.10F++ 1.30 1.30 1.30SPEED VC RATIO BREAKS FOR URBAN STREETS (HIGHEST SPEED FOR GIVEN LOS & FF SPEED)FFS B C D E F>47 42. 34. 27. 21. 16.>37 35. 28. 22. 17. 13.>32 30. 24. 18. 14. 10.<33 25. 19. 13. 9. 7.LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLD BY AREANUM LOS DEFINITION1 F CINCINNATI,CLEVELAND,COLUMBUS CENTRAL MPO COUNTIES (CUY,FRA,HAM)2 E OTHER TMA MPOS (AKRON,CANTON,DAYTON,TOLEDO,YOUNGSTOWN + NON-CENTRAL COUNTIES FROM 1)3 E OTHER MPOS & PARTS OF AREAS 1 & 2 OUTSIDE URBANIZED AREA4 E RURAL NON MPO COUNTIESPEAK SPREADING MODEL INFO (SET MAX ITERATIONS TO 0 TO DISABLE PEAK SPREADING)MAX VC RATIO FWY: 1.30MAX VC RATIO ART: 1.30MAX ITERATIONS : 1000TRUCK PCE: 2.0AQ SEASON FACTOR: 1.08MODEL CLASS PARAMETERS (MAX 4 CLASSES, HOURS 0-23 W/ NO OVERLAP IN CLASS, ALLOCATE ENTIRE CLASSAS TRUCK(1) OR NOT(0))CLS TRK 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00CLS BEG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00CLS END 23 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00CLS NUM 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00MOVES NETWORK LINK EMISSIONS OUTPUTCOUNTY MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5ADA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ALL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ASD JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ATB JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ATH JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000AUG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000BEL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000BRO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000BUT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201272CAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CHP JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CLA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CLE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CLI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000COL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000COS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CRA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CUY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000DAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000DEF JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000DEL JULY 9338410. 1.3861 3.2052 0.0000 0.0000ERI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000FAI JULY 2966111. 0.4322 1.0092 0.0000 0.0000FAY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000FRA JULY 41885732. 9.7187 18.9322 0.0000 0.0000FUL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GAL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GEA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GRE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GUE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAM JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HEN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HIG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HOC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HOL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HUR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JAC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JEF JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000KNO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LAK JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LAW JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LIC JULY 7956386. 1.3890 3.0306 0.0000 0.0000LOG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LOR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LUC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MAD JULY 1456698. 0.2000 0.4773 0.0000 0.0000MAH JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MED JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MEG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MER JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MIA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MOE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MOT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MRG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MRW JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MUS JULY 154280. 0.0223 0.0521 0.0000 0.0000Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201273NOB JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000OTT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PAU JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PER JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PIC JULY 1290973. 0.1665 0.4128 0.0000 0.0000PIK JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000POR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PRE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PUT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000RIC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ROS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SCI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SEN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SHE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000STA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SUM JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000TRU JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000TUS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000UNI JULY 3240407. 0.5868 1.2784 0.0000 0.0000VAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000VIN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WAS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WAY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WIL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WOO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WYA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000XXX JULY 205305. 0.0189 0.0528 0.0000 0.0000TOT JULY 68479568. 13.9114 28.4374 0.0000 0.0000MOVES INTRAZONAL EMISSIONS OUTPUTFRANKLIN COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 29831. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 29831. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 32217. 0.0037 0.0096 0.0000 0.0000DELAWARE COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 11821. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 11821. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 12767. 0.0015 0.0038 0.0000 0.0000LICKING COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 19500. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 19500. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 21060. 0.0024 0.0062 0.0000 0.0000FAIRFIELD COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 13281. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 13281. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201274JULY 14343. 0.0016 0.0043 0.0000 0.0000MADISON COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 2123. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 2123. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 2293. 0.0003 0.0007 0.0000 0.0000MOVES VEHICLE BASED EMISSIONS OUTPUTMONTH VEHICLES HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 2500242. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 2500242. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 2700262. 23.9915 43.1206 0.0000 0.0000Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201275Appendix G – MORPC HPMS VMT and EmissionsCOMBINED OFF-MODEL AREA EMISSIONS2002MOVES BASED HPMS EMISSIONS REPORTYou should enter a comment to add to the AQ report indicating reason and analystInput VMT File: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\MORPC_All_Off-Model_VMT_2002.csvNetwork Emission Factors: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\2002MORPC_ozone_3source_rpd.csvVehicle Emission Factors: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\2002MORPC_ozone_3source_rpv.csvVehicle Population: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\Source_Type_Pop_2002_MORPC_off-model_HPMS.csv-----------------------------------------DATE:09/20/2012 TIME:14:16:32PARAMETER FILE DUMP (DAILY.DAT FILE)HOUR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1415 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23PCTADTURB FWY 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 2.2 5.2 7.3 6.4 5.2 4.9 5.1 5.3 5.5 6.17.2 8.0 7.9 5.8 4.2 3.4 2.9 2.2 1.5URB ART 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.5 3.5 5.7 5.5 5.1 5.3 6.2 6.5 6.4 6.87.6 8.2 8.1 6.2 4.8 4.0 3.0 1.9 1.3RUR FWY 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.2 3.7 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.6 5.7 6.0 6.57.1 7.5 7.0 5.6 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.0RUR ART 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.0 2.4 4.8 6.2 5.5 5.3 5.5 5.8 6.0 6.0 6.77.6 8.1 7.7 5.6 4.2 3.5 2.8 1.9 1.3AQ SEASON FACTOR: 1.08000004MOVES HPMS EMISSIONS OUTPUTMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 4266744. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 4266744. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 4608084. 3.6745 14.2835 0.0000 0.0000MOVES VEHICLE BASED EMISSIONS OUTPUTMONTH VEHICLES HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 128680. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 128680. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 138974. 4.6122 4.0978 0.0000 0.00002006MOVES BASED HPMS EMISSIONS REPORTYou should enter a comment to add to the AQ report indicating reason and analystInput VMT File: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\MORPC_All_Off-Model_VMT_2006.csvNetwork Emission Factors: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\2006MORPC_ozone_3source_rpd.csvVehicle Emission Factors: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\2006MORPC_ozone_3source_rpv.csvVehicle Population: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\Source_Type_Pop_2006_MORPC_off-model_HPMS.csvCentral Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201276-----------------------------------------DATE:09/20/2012 TIME:14:15:56PARAMETER FILE DUMP (DAILY.DAT FILE)HOUR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1415 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23PCTADTURB FWY 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 2.2 5.2 7.3 6.4 5.2 4.9 5.1 5.3 5.5 6.17.2 8.0 7.9 5.8 4.2 3.4 2.9 2.2 1.5URB ART 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.5 3.5 5.7 5.5 5.1 5.3 6.2 6.5 6.4 6.87.6 8.2 8.1 6.2 4.8 4.0 3.0 1.9 1.3RUR FWY 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.2 3.7 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.6 5.7 6.0 6.57.1 7.5 7.0 5.6 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.0RUR ART 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.0 2.4 4.8 6.2 5.5 5.3 5.5 5.8 6.0 6.0 6.77.6 8.1 7.7 5.6 4.2 3.5 2.8 1.9 1.3AQ SEASON FACTOR: 1.08000004MOVES HPMS EMISSIONS OUTPUTMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 4638015. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 4638015. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 5009057. 2.7543 11.9524 0.0000 0.0000MOVES VEHICLE BASED EMISSIONS OUTPUTMONTH VEHICLES HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 138410. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 138410. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 149483. 4.5019 4.2765 0.0000 0.00002012MOVES BASED HPMS EMISSIONS REPORTYou should enter a comment to add to the AQ report indicating reason and analystInput VMT File: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\MORPC_All_Off-Model_VMT_2012.csvNetwork Emission Factors: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\2012MORPC_ozone_3source_rpd.csvVehicle Emission Factors: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\2012MORPC_ozone_3source_rpv.csvVehicle Population: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\Source_Type_Pop_2012_MORPC_off-model_HPMS.csv-----------------------------------------DATE:09/20/2012 TIME:14:02:12PARAMETER FILE DUMP (DAILY.DAT FILE)HOUR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1415 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23PCTADTURB FWY 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 2.2 5.2 7.3 6.4 5.2 4.9 5.1 5.3 5.5 6.17.2 8.0 7.9 5.8 4.2 3.4 2.9 2.2 1.5URB ART 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.5 3.5 5.7 5.5 5.1 5.3 6.2 6.5 6.4 6.87.6 8.2 8.1 6.2 4.8 4.0 3.0 1.9 1.3Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201277RUR FWY 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.2 3.7 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.6 5.7 6.0 6.57.1 7.5 7.0 5.6 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.0RUR ART 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.0 2.4 4.8 6.2 5.5 5.3 5.5 5.8 6.0 6.0 6.77.6 8.1 7.7 5.6 4.2 3.5 2.8 1.9 1.3AQ SEASON FACTOR: 1.08000004MOVES HPMS EMISSIONS OUTPUTMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 4964033. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 4964033. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 5361156. 1.2868 6.6290 0.0000 0.0000MOVES VEHICLE BASED EMISSIONS OUTPUTMONTH VEHICLES HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 153006. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 153006. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 165246. 3.3362 3.8740 0.0000 0.00002020MOVES BASED HPMS EMISSIONS REPORTYou should enter a comment to add to the AQ report indicating reason and analystInput VMT File: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\MORPC_All_Off-Model_VMT_2020.csvNetwork Emission Factors: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\2020MORPC_ozone_3source_rpd.csvVehicle Emission Factors: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\2020MORPC_ozone_3source_rpv.csvVehicle Population: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\Source_Type_Pop_2020_MORPC_off-model_HPMS.csv-----------------------------------------DATE:09/20/2012 TIME:14:17:17PARAMETER FILE DUMP (DAILY.DAT FILE)HOUR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1415 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23PCTADTURB FWY 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 2.2 5.2 7.3 6.4 5.2 4.9 5.1 5.3 5.5 6.17.2 8.0 7.9 5.8 4.2 3.4 2.9 2.2 1.5URB ART 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.5 3.5 5.7 5.5 5.1 5.3 6.2 6.5 6.4 6.87.6 8.2 8.1 6.2 4.8 4.0 3.0 1.9 1.3RUR FWY 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.2 3.7 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.6 5.7 6.0 6.57.1 7.5 7.0 5.6 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.0RUR ART 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.0 2.4 4.8 6.2 5.5 5.3 5.5 5.8 6.0 6.0 6.77.6 8.1 7.7 5.6 4.2 3.5 2.8 1.9 1.3AQ SEASON FACTOR: 1.08000004MOVES HPMS EMISSIONS OUTPUTMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 5514595. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 5514595. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 5955763. 0.5708 2.6214 0.0000 0.0000Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201278MOVES VEHICLE BASED EMISSIONS OUTPUTMONTH VEHICLES HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 172469. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 172469. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 186267. 2.1267 3.3179 0.0000 0.00002035MOVES BASED HPMS EMISSIONS REPORTYou should enter a comment to add to the AQ report indicating reason and analystInput VMT File: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\MORPC_All_Off-Model_VMT_2035.csvNetwork Emission Factors: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\2035MORPC_ozone_3source_rpd.csvVehicle Emission Factors: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\2035MORPC_ozone_3source_rpv.csvVehicle Population: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\Source_Type_Pop_2035_MORPC_off-model_HPMS.csv-----------------------------------------DATE:09/20/2012 TIME:14:17:55PARAMETER FILE DUMP (DAILY.DAT FILE)HOUR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1415 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23PCTADTURB FWY 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 2.2 5.2 7.3 6.4 5.2 4.9 5.1 5.3 5.5 6.17.2 8.0 7.9 5.8 4.2 3.4 2.9 2.2 1.5URB ART 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.5 3.5 5.7 5.5 5.1 5.3 6.2 6.5 6.4 6.87.6 8.2 8.1 6.2 4.8 4.0 3.0 1.9 1.3RUR FWY 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.2 3.7 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.6 5.7 6.0 6.57.1 7.5 7.0 5.6 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.0RUR ART 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.0 2.4 4.8 6.2 5.5 5.3 5.5 5.8 6.0 6.0 6.77.6 8.1 7.7 5.6 4.2 3.5 2.8 1.9 1.3AQ SEASON FACTOR: 1.08000004MOVES HPMS EMISSIONS OUTPUTMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 6580958. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 6580958. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 7107435. 0.4533 1.7070 0.0000 0.0000MOVES VEHICLE BASED EMISSIONS OUTPUTMONTH VEHICLES HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 208960. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 208960. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 225677. 2.0051 3.6038 0.0000 0.0000Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 79 

### Appendix H – Interagency consultation

**S ubject**  **RE: Ozone Summer Day Factors**

**From** Nick Gill

**To** Brunello, Nino; PJividen@AkronOhio.gov; CBaker@akron ohio.gov; Jeff Dutton; Bill Davis; aramirez@mvrpc.org;

Saleem Salameh; Lima (tmazur@lacrpc.com); smapel@lcounty.com; 'randy.durst@movrc.org'

(randy.durst@movrc.org); sschmid@clarkcountyohio.gov; mikepap@bhjmpc.org; David Gedeon;

rsharma@belomar.org; krodi@eastgatecog.org

**Cc** Fred Durham; Dines, Jennifer; Patricia Morris (Morri s.Patricia@epamail.epa.gov)

(Morris.Patricia@epamail.epa.gov); Moore, Dave; Byram, Mark; Chandra Parasa

**Sent** Thursday, April 19, 2012 2:33 PM

This seems appropriate to me.

N ick

From: Brunello, Nino [ mailto:Nino.Brunello@dot.state.oh.us ]

Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 2:30 PM

To: PJividen@AkronOhio.gov; CBaker@akronohio.gov; Jeff Dutton; Bill Davis; Nick Gill; aramirez@mvrpc.org; Saleem Salameh; Lima (tmazur@lacrpc.com); smapel@lcounty.com; 'randy.durst@movrc.org' (randy.durst@movrc.org); sschmid@clarkcountyohio.gov; mikepap@bhjmpc.org; David Gedeon; rsharma@belomar.org; krodi@eastgatecog.org

Cc: Fred Durham; Dines, Jennifer; Patricia Morris (Morris.Patricia@epamail.epa.gov) (Morris.Patricia@epamail.epa.gov); Moore, Dave; Byram, Mark Subject: FW: Ozone Summer Day Factors

All:

After discussions with ODOT, OEPA, WVDEP, and USEPA, we are of the opinion that there needs to be an

additional seasonal factor for summer when calculating ozone pollutants.

There is currently an adjustment for increasing average daily VMT (+ 8%) which was used in previously

when using Moblie6 to generate emission factors. With MOVES, there is a vehicle component used in
addition to VMT, so there needs to be an adjustment from average number of vehicles to the number of

vehicles in summer day. We propose to use the same 8% increase.

We need to have an inter-agency agreement on this, and would prefer to do it via email (to make it
easier on all of us). Please respond with your approval and/or questions.

Thanks,

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Nino Brunello, P.E. Modeling & Forecasting Section Division of Planning Ohio Department of Transportation (614) 752-5742Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 80 From: Dines, Jennifer

Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 9:04 AM

To: Brunello, Nino; Durham, William F

Cc: Moore, Dave Subject: RE: Ozone Summer Day Factors

Nino and Fred, talked to Pat and she agrees that BOT H VMT and number of vehicles should have the

1.08 factor applied.

Pat suggested we should have consultation on this. I told her ODOT is taking the lead on this project and
I’d let Dave know........she says email is fine.

Thanks,



### Jennifer Dines

Manager, State Implementation Plan and Rulemaking Section

Division of Air Pollution Control

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency
Wk (614) 644-3696

Fax (614) 644-3681

From: Brunello, Nino

Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 12:59 PM

To: Dines, Jennifer; Durham, William F Subject: RE: Ozone Summer Day Factors

Jennifer/Fred,

There is another item that needs to be discussed. Since we now calculate emission rates for both VMT
and number of vehicles, does there need to be a summer adjustment factors for vehicles as well? This

was not done with MOBILE, so we have nothing to follow. If I had to guess, I would think that there

would be an increase, but I couldn’t guess as to how many or what factor to use. Maybe just use 1.08 in

absence of anything better? Thoughts?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Nino Brunello, P.E. Modeling & Forecasting Section Division of Planning Ohio Department of Transportation (614) 752-5742

From: Dines, Jennifer

Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 8:47 AM

To: Brunello, Nino; Durham, William F Subject: RE: Ozone Summer Day Factors

I’m available



### Jennifer DinesCentral Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 81 Manager, State Implementation Plan and Rulemaking Se ction

Division of Air Pollution Control

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency
Wk (614) 644-3696

Fax (614) 644-3681

From: Brunello, Nino

Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 8:30 AM

To: Durham, William F; Dines, Jennifer Subject: RE: Ozone Summer Day Factors

I can call anytime. Will you both be around at 9:00 ? If not, when would be the next earliest time? (on

the half hours)

-Nino

From: Durham, William F [mailto:William.F.Durham@wv.gov]

Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 8:50 AM

To: Brunello, Nino

Cc: Dines, Jennifer Subject: Ozone Summer Day Factors

Nino:
I spoke with Jenn this morning and outlined the issue of Summer day VMT v. Average daily VMT.

We agreed that Pat Morris may be able to shed some light on the question.
Jenn & my calendars are open next Mon. and Tues. afternoon. Please give me a call & I’ll patch Jenn in.

FredCentral Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 82 From: Moore, Dave [ mailto:Dave.Moore1@dot.state.oh.us ]

Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 9:36 AM

To: aramirez@mvrpc.org; Andy Reser ; Bill Davis ; Bob Muransky ; Curtis Baker ; Jeff Dutton ; krodi@eastgatecog.org; Lamar Daniel; Leigh Oesterling ; mhill@lcounty.com; mikepap@bhjmpc.org; Nick Gill; Phyllis Jividen ; Randy Durst; Saleem Salameh (ssalameh@intelos.net); sschmid@clarkcountyohio.gov; Thom Mazur ; henry@tmacog.org

Cc: Dines, Jennifer; Brunello, Nino Subject: FW: Ozone SIP budgets

All,

See below, OEPA Ozone SIP Update message. Please review your region’s Ozone SIP update

submissions to OEPA to assure it includes **base year** mobile emissions inventory (see attached
spreadsheet – 2002 is the base year for most regions).

Thanks

DM

From: Dines, Jennifer

Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 8:17 AM

To: Moore, Dave

Cc: Brunello, Nino; Fetty, Erica Subject: RE: Ozone SIP budgets

Dave, we need to make sure all the MPOs know the num bers we need to complete our analysis. There
should be 4 years for everyone (nonattainment/base, attainment, interim and maintenance years, using

the years in the first tab of the attached sheet. Note that for Dayton there is an asterisk showing that

2005 was the interim budget year but 2009 was modeled...so we need both 2004 and 2009 years
remodeled (with all four years being 2002, 2005, 2009, 2018)



### Jennifer Dines

Manager, State Implementation Plan and Rulemaking Section

Division of Air Pollution Control

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency
Wk (614) 644-3696

Fax (614) 644-3681Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesSeptember, 201283**Area Counties Pollutant Base** **Year Budget** **Attainment Year** **Budget Interim** **Year Budget** **Maintence Year** **Budget**CantonStarkVOC2002NA2004NA200937.71201834.43NOx2002NA2004NA200918.0320187.08LimaAllenVOC 2002 NA 2004 NA 2009 5.08 2018 2.89NOx 2002 NA 2004 NA 2009 8.28 2018 2.47WheelingBelmontVOC2002NA2004NA20092.6020181.52NOx2002NA2004NA20094.6920181.91CincinnatiHamilton, Butler,Clermont, Warren,Dearbourne Township, INVOC 2005 NA 2008 NA 2015 31.73 2020 28.82NOx 2005 NA 2008 NA 2015 49.00 2020 34.39ClevelandAshtabula, Cuyahoga,Geauga, Lake, Lorain,Medina, Portage, SummitVOC2002NA2006NA201246.64202031.48NOx2002NA2006NA201295.89202042.75ColumbusDelaware, Fairfield,Franklin, Knox Licking, andMadisonVOC 2002 NA 2006 NA 2012 54.86 202036.60NOx 2002 NA 2006 NA 2012 91.46 202046.61DaytonSpringFieldClark, Greene, Miami, andMontgomeryVOC2002NA2005NA2005*29.19201814.73NOx2002NA2005NA2005*63.88201821.42ParkersburgMarriettaWashingtonVOC 2002 NA 2004 NA 2009 2.59 2018 1.67NOx 2002 NA 2004 NA 2009 3.58 2018 1.76SteubenvilleWeirtonJeffersonVOC2002NA2004NA20092.6320181.37NOx2002NA2004NA20094.1020181.67Toledo*Lucas and WoodVOC 2002 NA 2004 NA 2009 18.99 2018 11.20NOx 2002 NA 2004 NA 2009 33.75 2018 14.11Youngstown*Columbiana and MahoningVOC2002NA2004NA200919.58201810.56NOx2002NA2004NA200933.71201813.29Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 84 **Subject RE: 2008 Ozone standard transportation conformity** 

**From** Nick Gill

**To** Hill, Matt

**Cc** Chandra Parasa

**Sent** Friday, September 07, 2012 3:24 PM

Thanks. We shouldn’t need anything but will let you know if we do.

Nick

From: Hill, Matt [ mailto:mhill@lcounty.com ]

Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 3:21 PM

To: Nick Gill Subject: FW: 2008 Ozone standard transportation conformity

Nick,

Just let me know what you need from me.

Matt

From: Moore, Dave [ mailto:Dave.Moore1@dot.state.oh.us ]

Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 7:15 AM

To: rkoehler@oki.org ; Andy Reser ; ngill@morpc.org ; Mapel, Sandie; Phyllis Jividen ; 'cbaker@akronohio.gov'; Bill Davis ; V Nemalapuri ( VNemalapuri@mpo.noaca.org )

Cc: Bartizal, Melinda; Rebillot, Steve; DeHart, Steve; Pat Morris ; leigh.oesterling@dot.gov ; Walton, Sara; Phinney, Scott; Shepler, Andrew; Hurst, Andrew; Brunello, Nino; Byram, Mark; Fetty, Erica Subject: 2008 Ozone standard transportation conformity

All,

US EPA’s May 21, 2012 Federal Register notice designated the Cincinnati, Cleveland/Akron, and Columbus areas as

marginal nonattainment areas for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS. The designations were effective July, 20, 2012. The

attainment date for the 2008 standard December 31, 2015. Newly designated 2008 Ozone areas must
demonstrate conformity to the new standard within a one year grace period (July 20, 2013). US EPA also

concurrently revoked the 1997 Ozone standard effective July 20, 2013.

We need to establish schedules for Transportation Plan and TIP conformity demonstrations addressing the new

2008 Ozone standard. Issues for consideration:

• MPO and US DOT Conformity Determinations for the new 2008 standard must be finalized by July 20,

2013

• Conformity determinations for the 2014-2017 TIPs will also need finalized by July 1, 2013

• Conformity analyses after March 2, 2013 need to be MOVES based

• The Ohio Ozone SIP budgets are still MOBILE based

• US EPA reports that a minimum of 180 days are needed to fully approve (through the Federal
Register process) SIP revisions to update Ozone budgets to MOVES

• Conformity analyses performed prior to March 2, 2013 can continue to compare MOBILE analysis

year emissions to MOBILE budgetsC

e ntral Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates September, 2012 85 • Conformity analyses after March 2, 2013 (if MOVES based budgets are not yet finalized) will compare

MOVES based analysis years to MOBILE budgets

Please begin thinking about the 2008 conformity demonstrations for your MPO/AQ regions.

Thanks

DM

### Public Notice Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Redesignation and Maintenance Plan for the Ohio Portion of the Columbus Ozone

Basic Nonattainment Area

Delaware, Fairfield, Franklin, Knox, Licking, and Madison Counties

Notice is hereby given that the Director of the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, (Ohio EPA) is requesting that the United States Environment al Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) revise the current maintenance plan for the Columbus area, including Delaware, Fairfield, Franklin, Knox, Licking, and Madis on Counties, with respect to the 1997 eighthour ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). Ohio EPA submitted a redesignation request and maintenance pl an for this area on March 17, 2009 Subsequently, U.S. EPA approved this requests on September 15, 2009. Air quality monitoring data collected in the region dem onstrated attainment of the NAAQS and there was evidence that the improved ai r quality is due to permanent, enforceable emission reductions. In addition, existing requi rements are sufficient to maintain the 1997 eight-hour ozone standard in this ar ea throughout the maintenance period.

Ohio EPA is now requesting a revision to the maintenance plan to update mobile emission projections and conformity budget s based on emission rates generated from

U.S. EPA’s latest mobile emissions model , the Motor Vehicle Emission Simulation (MOVES) 2010. In December 2009, MOVES r eplaced MOBILE6.2 as the U.S. EPA’s

official emission factor model.

These actions must be noticed to allow public comment and to satisfy U.S. EPA requirements for public involvem ent in SIP related activities. This notice addresses Ohio EPA’s reliance on the emission projec tions as evidence of attainment and

maintenance and the commitment to instit ute contingency measures if ambient exceedances or violations trigger the cont ingency plan requirements. Written comments

will be received on or before December 4, 2012 at the following address:

E-mail: erica.fetty@epa.state.oh.us

Mailing address: Erica Fetty Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, DAPC

Lazarus Government Center

P.O. Box 1049 Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049 Phone: (614) 644-2310

Pursuant to Section 119.03 of the Ohio Revised Code, a public hearing on this redesignation request will be conduc ted as follows: December 4, 2012 at 3:00 P.M., at Ohio EPA Central Office at 50 West Town Street, Columbus, Ohio.

All interested persons are entitled to att end or be represented at the hearings and give

### written or oral comments on these changes. All oral comments presented at the hearing, and all written statements submitted at the hearing or to the above address by the close of business on December 4, 2012 will be considered by Ohio EPA prior to final action on this redesignation. Written statem ents submitted after December 4, 2012 may be considered as time and circumstances pe rmit, but will not be part of the official record of the hearing.

This redesignation and maintenance request is available on Ohio EPA DAPC’s Web page for electronic downloading at: http ://www.epa.ohio.gov/dapc/SIP/1997.aspx. Questions regarding accessing the web site should be directed to Arunee Niamlarb at 614-728-1342; other questions or comments about this document should be directed to either Erica Fetty, (614)-644-2310, Erica.Fetty@epa.state.oh.us or Jennifer Dines at (614) 644-3696, Jennifer.Dines@epa.state.oh.us or mailed to Erica Fetty or Jennifer

Dines at the above address.

### BEFORE THE OHIO EPA

- - -

IN RE: :

REDESIGNATION AND :

MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR THE :

OHIO PORTION OF THE :

COLUMBUS OZONE BASIC :

NONATTAINMENT AREA; :

DELAWARE, FAIRFIELD, :

FRANKLIN, KNOX, LICKING, :

AND MADISON COUNTIES. :

- - -

Taken before Michelle K. Douridas,

a Registered Professional Reporter and

Notary Public in and for the State of Ohio,

at 50 East Town Street, Columbus, Ohio,

commencing on Tuesday, December 4th, 2012, at

3:00 p.m.

- - -

MODERATOR MARY McCARRON 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

### P R O C E E D I N G S

- - -

MODERATOR McCARRON: My name's Mary

McCarron. I'm Public Involvement Manager for

Ohio EPA and will be presiding over the hearing

today.

Thanks for taking the time to attend the

hearing.

The purpose of the hearing is to obtain

comments from any interested person regarding

Ohio EPA's proposed action.

The State of Ohio is requesting that

U.S. EPA revise the current maintenance plan for

the Columbus area, including Delaware, Fairfield,

Franklin, Knox, Licking, and Madison Counties,

with respect to the 1997 eight-hour ozone

national ambient air quality standard.

Ohio EPA is now requesting a revision to

the maintenance plan to update mobile emission

projections and conformity budgets based on

emission rates generated from U.S. EPA's latest

mobile emissions model, the Motor Vehicle

Emission Simulation 2010.

In December 2009, MOVES replaced MOBILE 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

### 6.2 as the U.S. EPA's official emission factor

model.

All interested persons are entitled to

attend and be represented and to present oral

and/or written comments regarding the proposed

action.

All written and oral comments received

as part of the official record will be considered

by the Director of Ohio EPA.

To be included on the official record,

written comments must be received by Ohio EPA by

the close of business today, December 4th, 2012.

These comments may be filed with me or e-mailed

to Erica Fetty.

All written comments submitted for the

record receive the same consideration as any oral

testimony given today.

Written statements submitted after today

may be considered as time and circumstances

permit but won't be part of the official record

of the hearing.

At this time I will call on the only

person in attendance to provide testimony.

So, Dave Celebrezze, if you'd like to, 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

### provide your testimony.

MR. CELEBREZZE: Thank you. My name is

David Celebrezze, Director of Air and Water

Special Projects with the Ohio Environmental

Council.

We appreciate this opportunity to

comment.

The Ohio Environmental Council is a

statewide, nonprofit environmental organization

whose mission is to secure healthy air, land, and

water for all those who call Ohio home.

On behalf of our over 100 environmental

and conservation member organizations and

thousands of members throughout the State of

Ohio, the OEC respectfully submits the following

comments on the proposed redesignation and

maintenance plan of Central Ohio in meeting the

1997 ozone standard of .08 parts per million

(ppm).

It is our understanding that the

redesignation request is based on data from the

years 2006 through 2008. The data indicates that

Central Ohio does meet the attainment when

rounding the third digit in the parts per 4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

### million.

The highest average occurred in Franklin

County at .084 parts per million, which, when

rounded, is .08 parts per million; thus, meeting

the standard. The OEC supports this

redesignation.

Cars, trucks, buses, construction

equipment, power plants, and manufacturing

outfits are the main culprits for emitting

smog-forming pollutants.

The formation of smog has plagued many

regions of the state, including Central Ohio. It

is critical that the state address ozone

pollution in a way that reduces the harmful

impacts of this pollution.

The health impacts are well documented.

Some of the impacts according to U.S. EPA ozone

can be:

Cause shortness of breath and pain when

taking a deep breath;

aggravate lung diseases such as asthma,

emphysema, and chronic bronchitis;

increase the frequency of asthma

attacks; 5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

### make the lungs more susceptible to

infection;

continue to damage the lungs even when

the symptoms have disappeared.

When someone is affected by ozone

pollution, it impacts our economy and quality of

life.

A sick person is missing time from work

or school. If it is a child, a parent may have

to miss work and spend more money on medication,

inhalers, or hospitalizations if the number of

asthma attacks increases. This not only lowers

the quality of life in Central Ohio, it impacts

our economy.

Those at greatest risk include the most

vulnerable in our society; children, the elderly,

and those with breathing problems.

In essence, when we talk about the

numbers of people directly impacted by ozone

pollution, we need to realize that the actual

number of people impacted directly and indirectly

is much greater.

For every one person impacted directly,

there are two, three or more people who are 6

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

### indirectly impacted.

Has the Ohio EPA researched how much

money it costs Central Ohio when not meeting the

standard and/or during an air quality alert day

or several days after an air quality alert day?

In additional to health impacts, ozone

pollution impacts our environment. It clouds the

national vistas of our parks and wildlife refuges

and interrupts plant processes.

Ozone has the same impact on other

mammals; impacts to the lung function as well as

weakens the immune system.

It can decrease the species diversity

and change nutrient and water cycles. There's

nothing good about smog.

Moving foward: While great strides have

been made over the years to improve air quality,

and the OEC supports this redesignation request,

the state should re-double its clean air efforts.

Ohio has had poor air quality for too

long and it is too costly and too harmful to the

public.

According to the Mid-Ohio Regional

Planning Commission, MORPC, Central Ohio 7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

### experienced a total of 69 air quality alert days

from 2006 to 2008. This means it is recommended

that sensitive groups reduce the amount of time

they spend outside during the hottest part of the

day.

The Ohio EPA highlights several control

measures and regulations. While these are good

measures with actual reductions able to be

demonstrated, the majority are a result of

federal regulation.

The Ohio EPA does indicate many good

contingency measures that it can pursue and we

think they should.

Furthermore, the Kasich Administration

and the state should:

Increase the underfunded Diesel Emission

Reduction Grant program to $100 million a year

for five years;

adopt a no-idling law similar to the

laws in Cleveland, Lakewood, and other cities in

Northeast Ohio;

require all construction equipment

working on public projects to meet Tier 4 engine

standards; 8

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

### to adopt an E-check-like program for

on-road diesel trucks;

reinvest in truck stop electrification;

and put resources in teaming up with

metropolitan planning organizations and

nonprofits to educate the public on ozone

pollution prevention and steps to reduce

residents' exposure.

Are these clean air measure actions the

state has looked into?

The Kasich Administration should do

everything feasible to achieve maximum reductions

in smog-forming pollutants.

We know that the .08 parts per million

is not the most protective of public health and

that medical researchers recommend a standard

between .06 and .07 ppm.

In conclusion, the OEC supports the

redesignation, but the state should not get a

false sense of security, as we know newer ozone

standards are here that the state needs to meet.

We encourage the state to adopt stronger

measures to protect our environment, families,

and communities. 9

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

### Thank you again for this opportunity to

comment.

I also have photos to submit that show

diesel pollution, show an air quality alert day,

and then how ozone is formed.

MODERATOR McCARRON: Excellent. Thank

you, David.

At this time there's nobody else present

to provide testimony, so we'll go off the record

until 3:30.

(Short break in proceedings.)

MODERATOR McCARRON: At this time it is

3:30 and nobody else is present who would like to

provide testimony, so this hearing is adjourned.

- - -

Thereupon, at 3:30 on Tuesday, December

4th, 2012, the hearing was concluded.

- - - 10

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

### C E R T I F I C A T E

STATE OF OHIO :

SS:

COUNTY OF LICKING :

I, Michelle K. Douridas, a Registered
Professional Reporter and Notary Public in and
for the State of Ohio, duly commissioned and
qualified, do hereby certify that this hearing

was by me reduced to stenotype; that the foregoing is a true and correct transcript of the
hearing; that the hearing was taken at the time
and place in the caption specified and was
completed without adjournment; and that I am in

no way related to or employed by any attorney or party hereto, or financially interested in the
action, and I am not, nor is the court reporting

firm with which I am affiliated, under a contract

as defined in Civil Rule 28(D).

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal of office at
Pataskala, Ohio, on this 12th day of December,

2012.

___________________________ MICHELLE K. DOURIDAS, RPR

NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF OHIO

My Commission Expires: July 16th, 2013. 11

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24UNLEASHING THE POWER OF GREEN

December 4, 2012

Submitted to:

Erica Fetty 1207 Grandview Avenue, Suite 201 Columbus, Ohio Lf3212

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, DAPC

lazarus Government Center

P.O. Box 1049 Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049 (614) 1J87-7506 www.theOEC.org



### Ohio Environmental Council's Comments on Proposed redesignation of central Ohio in meeting

the 1997 national ozone standard

The Ohio Environmental Council (OEC) is a statewide, nonprofit environmental organization whose mission is

to secure healthy air, land, and water for all who call Ohio home. On behalf of our over 100 environmental and

conservation member organizations and thousands of members throughout the state of Ohio, the OEC
respectfully submits the following comments on the proposed redesignation and maintenance plan of central

Ohio in meeting the 1997 ozone standard of .o8 parts per million (ppm).

It is our understanding that the redesignation request is based on data from the years 2oo6 through 2008. The

data indicates that central Ohio does meet the attainment when rounding the third digit in the parts per

million. The highest average occurred in Franklin County at .o84ppm; which, when rounded, is .o8ppm (thus
meeting the standard).The OEC supports this redesignation.

Ozone, health and environmental impacts

Ozone pollution is formed when nitrogen oxides (NOx), and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) cook in the
long, hot days of summer. The formation of smog has plagued many regions of the state including central

Ohio. It is critical that the state address ozone pollution in a way that reduces the harmful impacts of this
pollution. The health impacts are well documented. According to the US EPA ozone can:

• Make it more difficult to breathe deeply and vigorously.

• Cause shortness of breath and pain when taking a deep breath.

• Cause coughing and sore or scratchy throat.

• Inflame and damage the airways.

• Aggravate lung diseases such as asthma, emphysema, and chronic bronchitis.

• Increase the frequency of asthma attacks.

• Make the lungs more susceptible to infection.

• Continue to damage the lungs even when the symptoms have disappeared.

When someone is affected by ozone pollution it impacts our economy and quality of life. A sick person is
missing time from work or school. If it is a child, a parent may have to take time off of work. Additionally, those suffering from respiratory ailments-like asthma-may have to spend more money to get medication, inhalers, or hospitalizations if the number of asthma attacks increases. This not only lowers the quality of life in central

Ohio it impacts our economy. Those at greatest risk include the most vulnerable in our society-children, the
elderly, and those with breathing problems. In essence, when we talk about the numbers of people directly
impacted by ozone pollution, we need to realize that the actually number of people impacted (directly and indirectly) is much greater. Has the Ohio EPA researched how much money it costs central Ohio when our air

is unhealthy?In addition to health impacts, ozone pollution impacts our environment. It clouds the natural vistas of our parks and wildlife refuges and interrupts plant processes. Ozone has the same impact on other mammalsimpacts to lung function as well as weakens the immune system.!! can decrease the species diversity and
change nutrient and water cycles. There is nothing good about smog.

Moving forward

While great strides have been made over the years to improve the air quality, and the OEC supports this
redesignation request, the state should re-double its clean air efforts. Ohio has had poor air quality for too long and it is too costly, and too harmful to the public. According to the Mid-Ohio Regional Planning

Commission (MORPC) central Ohio experienced a total of 69 air quality days from 2oo6-2oo8; with 2006 being

the highest (30). This means it is recommended that sensitive groups reduce the amount of time they spend

outside during the hottest part of the day. The Ohio EPA highlights several control measures and regulations
starting on page 26 of the redesignation request document. While these are good measures with actually

reductions able to be demonstrated, the majority are a result of federal regulation. The Ohio EPA does indicate

many good contingency measures (starting on page 31) that it can pursue and they should. Furthermore, the

Kasich Administration and the state should:

• Increase the underfunded Diesel Emission Reduction Grant program to $100 million a year for five

years. This level of funding will punch a big dent in dirty air and be a clear win for the economy, public

health, and the environment;

• Adopt a no-idling law similar to the laws in Cleveland, Lakewood, and other cities in northeast Ohio;

• Require all large construction equipment working on public projects to meet tier 4 engine standards;

• Adopt an E-check-like program for on-road diesel trucks; and,

• Reinvest in truck stop electrification.

• Teaming up with metropolitan planning organizations and non profits to educate the public on ozone pollution prevention and steps to reduce residents' exposure.

Are these clean air measure actions the state has looked into? The Kasich Administration should do everything

feasible to achieve maximum reductions in smog-forming pollutants. We know that the .o8ppm is not the most protective of public health and that medical researchers recommend a standard between .o6 and .o7ppm.

Thank you again for this opportunity to comment on the Ohio EPA's redesignation request and maintenance
plan for the Columbus, OH ozone nonattainment area.

Sincerely,


## J!J,JJ. 

# "R "A'

.. 

# t-
\,31 

# :»-

David R. Celebrezze

Dir. of Air & Water Special Projects

2

# z 

# c**~** (/)



# m + 

# j; i§

., ('"')



# +

:r: 

# ro !!:!.

go:.

(.Q 

# c ::u



# -· (0



# ;;r

II



## 0

N 

### 0 :J 

# roDivision of Air Pollution Control

Response to Comments

Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan

For the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard for the Columbus Area

Agency Contact for this Package

Division Contact: (Erica Fetty, Division of Air Pollution Control, 614-644-2310,
Erica.Fetty@epa.state.oh.us)

Ohio EPA held a public hearing in Columbus, OH on December 4, 2012, regarding the revised

Maintenance Plan for the former Columbus Ozone Nonattainment Area. This document

summarizes the comments and questions received at the public hearing and during the
associated comment period, which ended on December 4, 2012. Ohio EPA reviewed and

considered all comments received during the public comment period.

By law, Ohio EPA has authority to consider s pecific issues related to protection of the

environment and public health.

The name of the commenter follows the comment in parentheses.



### Comment 1 : The attached testimony was prov ided at the pu blic hearing in support of Ohio’s revised main tenance plan. Furthermore, the speaker encouraged Ohio to pursue ot her efforts to further clean the air. ( David Celebrezze- Ohio Environmental Council )

Response 1 : Thank you for your support of Ohio’s revised maintenance plan. We also appreciate and underst and the concerns regarding the effects of ozone pollution. With the promulgation of the latest ozone standard, at 75 ppb, Ohio EPA is analyzing air quality

around Ohio to determine if additional programs will be

necessitated in order to attain th is newer, lower, ozone standard by December 31, 2015. Thank you for your suggestions on ways to further improve air quality in Ohio.