alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Oplink Communications, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ Joseph Y. LiuJoseph Y. LiuPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
§ 52.9 How does the Secretary receive and respond to comments? ( a ) The Secretary follows the procedures in § 52.10 if— ( 1 ) A state office or official is designated to act as a single point of contact between a state process and all Federal agencies, and
( 2 ) That office or official transmits a state process recommendation for a program selected under § 52.6.
( b ) ( 1 ) The single point of contact is not obligated to transmit comments from state, areawide, regional or local officials and entities where there is no state process recommendation.
( 2 ) If a state process recommendation is transmitted by a single point of contact, all comments from state, areawide, regional, and local officials and entities that differ from it must also be transmitted.
( c ) If a state has not established a process, or is unable to submit a state process recommendation, state, areawide, regional and local officials and entities may submit comments either to the applicant or to the Department.
( d ) If a program or activity is not selected for a state process, state, areawide, regional and local officials and entities may submit comments either to the applicant or to the Department. In addition, if a state process recommendation for a nonselected program or activity is transmitted to the Department by the single point of contact, the Secretary follows the procedures of § 52.10 of this part.
( e ) The Secretary considers comments which do not constitute a state process recommendation submitted under these regulations and for which the Secretary is not required to apply the procedures of § 52.10 of this part, when such comments are provided by a single point of contact, by the applicant, or directly to the Department by a commenting party.
Editorial Note on Part 982
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999, and at 89 FR 38293, May 7, 2024.

§ 982.302 Issuance of voucher; Requesting PHA approval of assisted tenancy. ( a ) When a family is selected, or when a participant family wants to move to another unit, the PHA issues a voucher to the family. The family may search for a unit.
( b ) If the family finds a unit, and the owner is willing to lease the unit under the program, the family may request PHA approval of the tenancy. The PHA has the discretion whether to permit the family to submit more than one request at a time.
( c ) The family must submit to the PHA a request for approval of the tenancy and a copy of the lease, including the HUD-prescribed tenancy addendum. The request must be submitted during the term of the voucher.
( d ) The PHA specifies the procedure for requesting approval of the tenancy. The family must submit the request for approval of the tenancy in the form and manner required by the PHA.
[64 FR 26644, May 14, 1999]
PACKAGED SYSTEM HEAT PUMPS: COST AND EFFICIENCY DATA

Total Total

% Over Manufacturer's Cost Multiplier Manuf. Equip. Install. Installed Annual Annual 

Level Description Baseline ARI mean Reverse Engr Cost Price Price Price Repair Maint. SEER H

SEER Split Packaged Split Packaged (1998$) (1998$) (1998$) (1998$) (1998$) (1998$) (Btu/Whr) (Bt

0 Baseline (SEER=10) 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% $593 $1,439 $2,160 $3,599 $39 $36 10 

1 10% Impr. (SEER=11) 10% 110% 114% 105% 108% $640 $1,531 $2,160 $3,691 $39 $36 11 2 20% Impr. (SEER=12) 20% 124% 128% 113% 113% $670 $1,588 $2,160 $3,748 $40 $36 12 3 30% Impr. (SEER=13) 30% 144% 160% 130% 138% $818 $1,875 $2,160 $4,035 $40 $36 13 4 40% Impr. (SEER=14) 40% 164% 175% 179% 174% $1,032 $2,287 $2,160 $4,447 $62 $36 14 5 50% Impr. (SEER=15) 50% 209% 213% 194% 186% $1,103 $2,425 $2,160 $4,585 $66 $36 15 6 80% Impr. (SEER=18) 80% 209% 213% 194% 186% $1,103 $2,425 $2,160 $4,585 $66 $36 18 

Split Packaged

Baseline Mfg Cost $572 $593

Installation Price $2,280 $2,160

Marginal Markups Distributior M

New Retrofit Wt.Avg / Baseline Cum

34% 66% Sampled Markup Markup Pro

Manufacturer Markup 1.23 1.23 1.23 1.23 1.027 

Distributor Markup 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.37 1.056 

Dealer Markup 1.27 1.27 1.27 1.27 1.069 

Builder Markup 1.26 1.00 1.09 1.09 1.077 

Sales Tax Distribution for Retrofit 1.084 

Sales Tax 1.00 1.07 1.04 1.04 10% 30% 38% 22% 1.091 

1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.098 

Service Cost $36 1.105 

1.114 

New/Retrofit Group 1 1=New, 2=Retrofit 1.126 

1.155
V 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3355 

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain drawback claims 

relating to petroleum products. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 19, 2005 

Mr. JEFFERSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain 

drawback claims relating to petroleum products. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DRAWBACK CLAIMS RELATING TO PETROLEUM 

4 PRODUCTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 514 of 

6 the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other pro7 vision of law, the Bureau of Customs and Border Protec8 tion of the Department of Homeland Security shall, not 

9 later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this 

10 Act, liquidate or reliquidate each drawback claim de-
2 

•HR 3355 IH 

1 scribed in subsection (c) at the full amount in each such 

2 claim. 

3 (b) PAYMENTS OF AMOUNTS DUE.—Any amounts 

4 owed by the United States pursuant to liquidations or re5 liquidations under subsection (a) shall be paid by the Bu6 reau of Customs and Border Protection within 90 days 

7 after such liquidation or reliquidation. 

8 (c) DRAWBACK CLAIMS.—The drawback claims re9 ferred to in subsection (a) are the following: 

Drawback Claim Number: Filing Date:

BQ901000001 ........................................................ 06/27/95

BQ902000000 ........................................................ 07/01/95

BQ903000009 ........................................................ 07/01/95

BQ904000008 ........................................................ 07/12/95

BQ905000007 ........................................................ 07/12/95

BQ906000006 ........................................................ 07/14/95

BQ907000005 ........................................................ 07/14/95

BQ908000004 ........................................................ 07/14/95

BQ909000003 ........................................................ 07/20/95

BQ910000000 ........................................................ 07/20/95

BQ911000009 ........................................................ 07/20/95

BQ900000259 ........................................................ 07/25/95

BQ913000007 ........................................................ 07/25/95

BQ914000006 ........................................................ 07/28/95

BQ915000005 ........................................................ 08/07/95

BQ916000004 ........................................................ 08/07/95. 

Æ
### §51323. United States Merchant Marine Academy Advisory Council

(a) Establishment.—The Secretary of Transportation shall establish an advisory council, to be known as the "United States Merchant Marine Academy Advisory Council" (in this section referred to as the "Council").

(b) Membership.—

(1) In general.—The Secretary shall select not fewer than 8 and not more than 14 individuals to serve as members of the Council. Such individuals shall have such expertise as the Secretary determines necessary and appropriate for providing advice and guidance on improving the Academy.

(2) Governmental experts.—The number of members of the Council who are employees of the Federal Government may not exceed the number of members of the Council who are not employees of the Federal Government.

(3) Employee status.—Members of the Council shall not be considered employees of the United States Government by reason of their membership on the Council for any purpose and shall not receive compensation other than reimbursement of travel expenses and per diem allowance in accordance with section 5703 of title 5.

(c) Responsibilities.—The Council shall provide advice to the Secretary at the time and in the manner requested by the Secretary.

(d) Personally Identifiable Information.—In carrying out its responsibilities under this subsection, the Council shall comply with the obligations of the Department of Transportation to protect personally identifiable information.

(Added Pub. L. 117–81, div. C, title XXXV, §3501(c)(1), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2238.)
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-1630

___________________________ United States of America llllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v. Eddie David Cox lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________ Submitted: February 26, 2020 Filed: March 6, 2020 [Unpublished]

____________ Before GRUENDER, KELLY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States. See Cox v. United States , 589 U.S. ---,140 S. Ct. 396 (2019) (mem.), vacating 766 F. App’x 423 (8th Cir. 2019) (per curiam)

. The Supreme Court granted certiorari , vacated our judgment, and remanded the matter for reconsideration in light of Rehaif v. United States , 588 U.S. ---, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019).“In Rehaif , the Supreme Court concluded that in a prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) and § 924(a)(2), the Government must prove both that the defendant knew he possessed a firearm and that he knew he belonged to the relevant category of persons barred from possessing a firearm. ” United States v. Davies , 942 F.3d 871, 873 (8th Cir. 2019) (internal quotation marks omitted and emphasis in original). Because this issue is raised for the first time on appeal, we review for plain error. See id .; see also United States v. Olano , 507 U.S. 725, 732 (1993) (explaining that plain error requires (1) an error (2) that is plain and (3) that affects substantial rights). The Government concedes that the first two prongs of the plain error standard are satisfied. But we conclude that Cox cannot show the error affected his substantial rights. Davies , 942 F.3d at 873 (“The Supreme Court has explained that, in the ordinary case, an error affects the defendant’s substantial rights if the defendant shows a reasonable probability that, but for the error, the outcome of the proceeding would have been different.” (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted)). In addition to a number of other convictions resulting in years of imprisonment, Cox was previously convicted as a felon in possession of a firearm and served approximately six years’ imprisonment for the conviction. See United States v. Hollingshed , 940 F.3d 410, 415-16 (8th Cir. 2019) (finding that a defendant who had served over four years’ imprisonment could not show that any error affected his substantial rights); United States v. Benamor , 937 F.3d 1182, 1189 (9th Cir. 2019) (finding that, following Rehaif , the defendant could not show that his substantial rights were affected in part because the defendant had a prior felon-in-possession conviction).

-2-For the foregoing reasons, we thus reinstate our vacated opinion (as well as

Judge Kelly’s dissent) and again affirm the district court. 1

______________________________

1 The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
#### (A)In the Matter of Sidney J. Ungar v. Joseph A. Sarafite. (B) The People of the State of New York v. Christopher Romano.

Concur—Rabin, J. P., Tálente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Tálente, Eager and Steuer, JJ. [In each action] Motion for reargument denied.
#### § 891.775 Security deposits.

The general requirements for security deposits on assisted units are provided in § 891.435. For purposes of subpart E of this part, the additional requirements in § 891.635 apply.
###### Editorial Note on Part 3282

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3282 appear at 78 FR 60199, Oct. 1, 2013.

#### § 3282.212 Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Title VI requirements.

Manufacturers must maintain bills of lading, invoices, or comparable documents that include a written statement from the supplier that the component or finished goods are TSCA Title VI compliant for a minimum of 3 years from the date of import, purchase, or shipment, consistent with 40 CFR 770.30(c) and 770.40.

[85 FR 5566, Jan. 31, 2020]
§ 81.96 Withdrawal of Eligible Book-entry GSE Securities for conversion to definitive form. ( a ) Eligible Book-entry GSE Securities may be withdrawn from the Book-entry System by requesting delivery of like Definitive GSE Securities.
( b ) A Reserve bank shall, upon receipt of appropriate instructions to withdraw Eligible Book-entry GSE Securities from book-entry in the Book-entry System, convert such securities into Definitive GSE Securities and deliver them in accordance with such instructions. No such conversion shall affect existing interests in such GSE Securities.
( c ) All requests for withdrawal of Eligible Book-entry GSE Securities must be made prior to the maturity or date of call of the securities.
( d ) GSE Securities which are to be delivered upon withdrawal may be issued in either registered or bearer form, to the extent permitted by the applicable Securities Documentation.
[61 FR 63948, Dec. 2, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 28977, May 29, 1997]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3285 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3285

       To suspend temporarily the duty on charge control agent 7.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 14, 2005

  Mr. Castle introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on charge control agent 7.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHARGE CONTROL AGENT 7.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.13.12       Charge control     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         agent 7                                                            31/2008
                         Chromate(1-
                         ),bis{1-{(5-
                         chloro-2-
                         hydroxyphenyl)azo
                         }-2-
                         napthalenolato(2-
                         )}-hydrogen
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2942.00.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 50.34 Time delays for exceptional circumstances. ( a ) Under the circumstances described in this section, the FONSI must be made available for public review for 30 calendar days before a final decision is made whether to prepare an EIS and before the HUD action is taken. The circumstances are: ( 1 ) When the proposed action is, or is closely similar to, one which normally requires the preparation of an EIS pursuant to § 50.42(b) but it is determined, as a result of an EA or in the course of preparation of a draft EIS, that the proposed action will not have a significant impact on the human environment; or
( 2 ) When the nature of the proposed action is without precedent and does not appear to require more than an assessment.
( b ) In such cases, the FONSI must be concurred in by the AS/CPD and the Program Environmental Clearance Officer. Notice of the availability of the FONSI shall be given to the public in accordance with paragraphs (a) through (d) of § 50.23.
December 23, 2009

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Final Revisions to: the Requireme nts for Transboundary Shipments of

Wastes between OECD Countries, th e Requirements for Export Shipments of Spent Lead Acid Batteries, the Requirements on Submitting Exception Reports for Export Shipments of Ha zardous Wastes, and the Requirements for Import Shipments of Hazardous Wastes

FROM: Laura Coughlan Materials Recovery and Waste Management Division Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2005-0018

The following copy of the final rule (“OE CD-SLAB final rule 12.17.09 redline.pdf”) in the docket highlights the changes EPA made to the final rule document during and after review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) from October through November 2009. The copy resulted from a comparison of the final version with the version provided to OMB for review. OMB approved the draft preamble, regulatory text, and economic analysis document without comment. None of the changes, therefore,

were made as a result of OMB comments. Some changes to the regulatory text were made at the request of the Federal Register Office during their review of the text related to the incorporation by refe rence of the OECD Green a nd Amber waste lists. Other editorial changes were made independently by EPA. None of the changes impacted the economic analysis, and the version posted in the docket (“OECD-SLAB_Final Rule EA.pdf”) is identical to the version th at OMB approved without comment.
Exhibit
10.1


 


AMENDMENT
TO THE

INTERPACE BIOSCIENCES, INC. 2019 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


 


The
Interpace Biosciences, Inc. 2019 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended, effective as of the date of
adoption of this Amendment by the Board of Directors of Interpace Biosciences, Inc. (the “Company”):


 


1.
Section 3(a) of the Plan is amended in its entirety; provided that Section 3(a)(i), as amended, is subject to approval by the Company’s
stockholders in accordance with Section 11 of the Plan:


 


	 	(a)	Shares
    Subject to the Plan.


 


(i)
Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 3(c) of the Plan, the maximum number of Shares that may be issued in respect of Awards
under the Plan is 2,230,000 Shares (the “Plan Limit”), all of which may be issued in respect of Incentive Stock Options.
Any Shares issued hereunder may consist, in whole or in part, of authorized and unissued Shares or treasury shares. Any Shares issued
by the Company through the assumption or substitution of outstanding grants in connection with the acquisition of another entity shall
not reduce the maximum number of Shares available for delivery under the Plan.


 


(ii)
Any Shares that are available for issuance under the Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc. Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Award and Incentive
Plan (the “2004 Plan”) as of the Effective Date, and any Shares that become available for issuance under the 2004
Plan following the Effective Date in accordance with the terms of the 2004 Plan (the “Additional Shares”) may be issued
to Participants pursuant to the terms of this Plan. The Plan Limit shall be increased by such number of Additional Shares.


 


*
* *


 


Except
as amended hereby, the terms and conditions of the Plan shall otherwise continue in full force and effect.


 


	 	INTERPACE BIOSCIENCES, INC.
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Thomas W. Burnell
	 	Name:	Thomas W. Burnell
	 	Title:	President and Chief Executive Officer
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

WASHINGTON :

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001

69–010

" SENATE !

114th Congress

2d Session

S. Report

2016

114–429

SPECIAL REPORT

of the

U.S. SENATE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON AGING

on the

SUDDEN PRICE SPIKES IN OFF-PATENT

PRESCRIPTION DRUGS:

THE MONOPOLY BUSINESS MODEL THAT HARMS

PATIENTS, TAXPAYERS, AND

THE U.S. HEALTH CARE SYSTEM

December 20, 2016.—Ordered to be printed

Filed, under authority of the order of the Senate December 10

(legislative day December 9), 2016


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
(III)

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

U.S. SENATE,

SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON AGING,

Washington, DC, December 20, 2016.

Hon. JOE BIDEN,

President, U.S. Senate,

Washington, DC.

DEAR MR. PRESIDENT: Under authority of Senate Resolution 73

agreed to on February 12, 2015, I am submitting to you a report

of the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging entitled: ‘‘Sudden

Price Spikes in Off-Patent Prescription Drugs: The Monopoly Business Model that Harms Patients, Taxpayers, and the U.S. Health

Care System.’’

Senate Resolution 4, the Committee Systems Reorganization

Amendment of 1977, authorizes the Special Committee on Aging

‘‘to conduct a continuing study of any and all matters pertaining

to the problems and opportunities of older people, including but not

limited to, problems and opportunities of maintaining health, of assuring adequate income, of finding employment, of engaging in productive and rewarding activity, of securing proper housing and,

when necessary, of obtaining care and assistance.’’ Senate Resolution 4 also requires that the results of these studies and recommendations be reported annually.

I am pleased to transmit this report to you.

Sincerely,

SUSAN M. COLLINS,

Chairman.


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
#### § 1.3 Use of letters and acronym MSHA.

The letters and acronym MSHA may be used and substituted for the words “Mine Safety and Health Administration” in correspondence, rules, regulations, and in certificates of approval, approval plates, labels, and markings prescribed by the Mine Safety and Health Administration to designate and denote equipment, devices, and apparatus approved as “permissible” and suitable for use in mines under the applicable parts of Chapter I of this title, and in such other documents, publications, and pamphlets, and on signs, clothing and uniforms, and offices of the Administration and at such times and locations as may be deemed appropriate by the Assistant Secretary of Labor for Mine Safety and Health.

[39 FR 23997, June 28, 1974, as amended at 43 FR 12312, Mar. 24, 1978]