alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2701. Advisory Committee on the Records of Congress

(a) There is established the Advisory Committee on the Records of Congress (hereafter in this chapter referred to as the Committee).

(b) The Committee shall be subject to the provisions of chapter 10 of title 5, except that the Committee shall be of permanent duration, notwithstanding any provision of section 1013 of title 5.

(Added Pub. L. 101–509, title IV, §1(d)(1), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1417; amended Pub. L. 117–286, §4(a)(287), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4337.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Another section 1 of title IV of Pub. L. 101–509, 104 Stat. 1421, amended section 8902 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2701, Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1295, established Federal Records Council and set forth composition, compensation, etc., of such Council, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 95–378, §2(a), Sept. 22, 1978, 92 Stat. 723. Section 1 of Pub. L. 95–378 abolished the Federal Records Council.

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 117–286 substituted "chapter 10 of title 5, except that the Committee shall be of permanent duration, notwithstanding any provision of section 1013 of title 5." for "the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.), except that the Committee shall be of permanent duration, notwithstanding any provision of section 14 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act."
#### Theodore L. Cross, Appellant, v Communication Channels, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Appeal from order, Supreme Court," New York County, entered on June 30, 1977, unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs and without disbursements. No opinion. Concur—Evans, J. P., Markewich, Lynch, Sandler and Sullivan, JJ.
September 22, 2015

Mr. Robert Scaglione

Chief Inspector / DQC

Eastern Air Lines

Miami International Airport

4200 NW 36 th Street, Bldg. 5A

Miami, FL 33165

Dear Mr. Scaglione :

Th is is in response to your September 14 , 2015, letter sent to the public docket ( No. FAA

2015

- 3895 ) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration on behalf of Eastern Air L ines

( EAL ) for an exemption from § 121

. 1 117(e)(1) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations

( 14 CFR) . That exemption , if granted, would exempt EAL from the requirements of §

12 1

. 1 117 to meet the 50% fleet compliance requirement for ins tallation of Flammability

Reduction Means (FRM )

.

On the compliance da te of December 26, 2014, EAL had no compliance requirement because

it was not certificated until May 13, 2015 . Once c ertificate d

, EAL’s fleet consisted of one

airplane subject to § 129. 1 117(e) (1 )

. That airplane me t the FRM requirements of § 129. 1117

on the date of certification . However, § 129. 1 117 did not technically apply to EAL as it

requires a minimum of two aircraft to be in a fleet. On July 29, 2015, EAL add ed a second

aircraf t to its fleet, which did not meet the FRM requiremen ts of § 129.1117, bringing EAL

fleet compliance rate to 50 %.

The December 26, 2014, 50% compliance date of § 121

. 1 117(e)(1) was a “snapshot” in time

and should not be viewed as a rolling requirement after that deadline. EAL does not need to

maintain the 50% number as its fleet changes between now and the December 26, 2017,

100% fleet requirement per § 121

. 1 117(e)(2) and (m). However , any airplane add e d to EAL ’s

fleet after the December 26 2014

, compliance date that is not in compliance with the FRM

requirements will require FRM retrofit by December 26, 2017.

Be cause the relief you s eek does not require an exemption , we will take no further action o n

your petition.

Sincerely,2

/s/

John Barbagallo

Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service
### §5109. Reciprocity for foreign vessels

(a) When the Secretary finds that the laws and regulations of a foreign country related to load lines are similar to those of this chapter and the regulations prescribed under this chapter, or when a foreign country is a party to an international load line agreement to which the United States Government is a party, the Secretary shall accept the load line marks and certificate of a vessel of that foreign country as complying with this chapter and the regulations prescribed under this chapter. The Secretary may control the vessel as provided for in the applicable international agreement.

(b) Subsection (a) of this section does not apply to a vessel of a foreign country that does not recognize load lines assigned under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 99–509, title V, §5101(2), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1917.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### Revised section 5109

Source: Section (U.S. Code) 46 App. U.S.C. 86f, 88d.

Section 5109(a) requires the Secretary to accept the load line mark and load line certificate of a vessel of a foreign country if the Secretary finds that the load line laws and regulations of that country are similar to those of this chapter, or if that country is a party to an international load line agreement to which the United States is a party.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Home City Financial Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations, and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods
presented in this quarterly report;
 4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report
(the Evaluation Date); and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent
fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer
s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    Any significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize, and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.
 November 10, 2006
    
    /s/ J. William StapletonJ. William Stapleton, President, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer
  22
### §770. Rectangular mode of survey; departure from

The Secretary of the Interior may, by regulation, provide that departures may be made from the system of rectangular surveys whenever it is not feasible or economical to extend the rectangular surveys in the regular manner or whenever such departure would promote the beneficial use of lands.

(R.S. §2410; Apr. 29, 1950, ch. 134, §2, 64 Stat. 93.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §2410 derived from act Mar. 3, 1853, ch. 145, §4, 10 Stat. 245.

#### Amendments

1950—Act Apr. 29, 1950, struck out limitation that, when there are departures from the rectangular surveys, the lands shall not be surveyed into less than 160 acres or subdivided into less than 40 acres, and by substituting a general provision for those departures.
#### (A) The People of the State of New York ex rel. Alfred Turner, Appellant, v. Edward M. Fay, as Warden of Green Haven Prison, Respondent. (B) The People of the State of New York ex rel. William Wosnik, Appellant, v. Edward M. Fay, as Warden of Green Haven Prison, Respondent.

[In each action] Motion by appellant for leave to appeal as a poor person and for assignment of counsel, denied. The papers submitted on this motion show no merit in the appeal. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2427

WOJCIECH M. TURKOWSKI, Petitioner, versus U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A28-886-342) Submitted: April 20, 1999 Decided: May 3, 1999 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wojciech M. Turkowski, Petitioner Pro Se. Marion Edward Guyton, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Wojciech Turkowski petitions for review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his applicationfor asylum and withholding of deportation. Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. In re Turkowski , No. A28-886-342 (Bd. Imm. App., Aug. 27, 1998). Turkowski’s motions to dismiss Respondent’s counsel, to deny Respondent an extension of time to file a brief, and to transfer his case to a criminal court are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit23.1**

 

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-137677) pertaining to the BareEscentuals, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Plan and 2006 Equity Incentive AwardPlan, of our report dated March 27, 2007, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements of Bare Escentuals, Inc. included in the Annual Report(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006.

 
|                           | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
|---------------------------|---------------------------|
|                      |                      |
| San Francisco, California |                      |
| March 27, 2007       |                      |

 

----
### Part B—Actions To Address Foreign Practices
§ 25.12 Public access to information; publication of actions. ( a ) Where a notice of administrative action does not result in a hearing and in any cases in which a settlement is entered into by the Board and a mortgagee, all non-privileged information regarding the nature of the violation and the resolution of the action shall be available to the public.
( b ) Publication in the Federal Register. The Secretary shall publish, in the Federal Register, a description of and the cause for each administrative action taken by the Board against a mortgagee.
( c ) *Notification of other agencies.* Whenever the Board has taken any discretionary action to suspend and/or withdraw the approval of a mortgagee, the Secretary shall provide prompt notice of the action and a statement of the reasons for the action to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs; the chief executive officer of the Federal National Mortgage Association; the chief executive officer of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation; the Administrator of the Rural Housing Service (formerly the Farmers Home Administration); the Comptroller of the Currency, if the mortgagee is a National Bank or District Bank or subsidiary or affiliate of such a bank; the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, if the mortgagee is a state bank that is a member of the Federal Reserve System or a subsidiary or affiliate of such a bank, or a bank holding company or a subsidiary or affiliate of such a company; the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, if the mortgagee is a state bank that is not a member of the Federal Reserve System, or is a subsidiary or affiliate of such a bank; and the Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision, if the mortgagee is a federal or state savings association or a subsidiary or affiliate of a savings association.
( d ) *Notification to GNMA of withdrawal actions.* Whenever the Board issues a notice of violation that could lead to withdrawal of a mortgagee's approval, or is notified by GNMA of an action that could lead to withdrawal of GNMA approval, the Board shall proceed in accordance with 12 U.S.C. 1708(d).
[73 FR 60542, Oct. 10, 2008]
**EXHIBIT 32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      Peter
      J. Anderson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
      Report of Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year
      ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      applicable, and that information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents
      in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations
      of
      Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc.




**/s/****PETER
                  J. ANDERSON**Name:Peter
                  J. AndersonTitle:*Chief
                  Financial Officer*Date:June
                  14, 2006
§ 81.64 Periodic reports. Each GSE shall provide to the Secretary all: ( a ) Material distributed to the GSE's Housing Advisory Council;
( b ) Press releases;
( c ) Investor reports;
( d ) Proxy statements;
( e ) Seller-servicer guides; and
( f ) Other information disclosed by the GSE to entities outside of the GSE, but only where the GSE determines that such information is relevant to the Secretary's regulatory responsibilities.
### §313. Examining boards: paper; bindery materials; machinery

The Deputy Director of the Government Publishing Office, the superintendent of printing, and a person designated by the Joint Committee on Printing, shall constitute a board to examine and report in writing on paper delivered under contract, or by purchase or otherwise, at the Government Publishing Office.

The Deputy Director of the Government Publishing Office, the superintendent of binding, and a person designated by the Joint Committee on Printing shall constitute a board to examine and report in writing on material, except paper, for the use of the bindery.

The Deputy Director of the Government Publishing Office, the superintendent of printing, and a person designated by the Joint Committee on Printing shall constitute a board of condemnation, who, upon the call of the Director of the Government Publishing Office, shall determine the condition of presses and other machinery and material used in the Government Publishing Office, with a view to condemnation.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1242; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(b), (c)(1), (e)(1), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §49 (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §20, 28 Stat. 603; May 27, 1908, ch. 200, §1, 35 Stat. 382; June 7, 1924, ch. 303, §1, 43 Stat. 509).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–235, §1301(e)(1), substituted "Deputy Director of the Government Publishing Office" for "Deputy Public Printer" wherever appearing.

Pub. L. 113–235, §1301(c)(1), substituted "Director of the Government Publishing Office" for "Public Printer".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Government Publishing Office" substituted for "Government Printing Office" in text on authority of section 1301(b) of Pub. L. 113–235, set out as a note preceding section 301 of this title.
###### Editorial Note on Part 5

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 5 appear at 65 FR 16715, Mar. 29, 2000.

#### § 5.857 When must I prohibit admission of alcohol abusers?

You must establish standards that prohibit admission to federally assisted housing if you determine you have reasonable cause to believe that a household member's abuse or pattern of abuse of alcohol interferes with the health, safety, or right to peaceful enjoyment of the premises by other residents.
#### Maude K. Hayes, Appellant, v. Utica Mutual Insurance Company et al., Respondents.

Appeal unanimously dismissed, without costs on the ground that the matter is academic. Memorandum: The order as amended granted a motion to dismiss the complaint (not the same complaint as is involved in Cases 2 and 3) with leave to amend. An amended complaint was served in accordance with such leave. This amended complaint superseded and replaced the original complaint and therefore the original complaint involved in this appeal is not before us. (Appeal from judgment and order of Oneida Special Term dismissing the complaint.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
### §14503. Certificate of measurement

(a) The Secretary shall prescribe the certificate to be issued as evidence of a vessel's measurement under this chapter.

(b) The certificate shall be maintained as required by the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 99–509, title V, §5101(3), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1923; Pub. L. 111–281, title III, §303(e)(2), Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 2925.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### Revised section 14503

Source: Section (U.S. Code) 46 App. U.S.C. 72.

Section 14503 requires the Secretary to issue a certificate, in a manner that is to be prescribed by the Secretary, as evidence of a vessel's regulatory measurement.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–281 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-20186

Conference Calendar

__________________

GEORGE EARL JENKINS,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DAVID R. GILBERTSON,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-94-CV-3323

- - - - - - - - - -

June 27, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

George Jenkins, #621316, has appealed the district court's

dismissal without prejudice of his civil rights action. His sole

contention on appeal, that the district court lacked the inherent

authority to dismiss his appeal for lack of prosecution, is

frivolous. See McCullough v. Lynaugh, 835 F.2d 1126, 1127 (5th

Cir. 1988). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 

See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
No. 96-20186

-2-

We caution Jenkins that any additional frivolous appeals

filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid

sanctions, Jenkins is further cautioned to review any pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous because they have been previously decided by this

court. 

APPEAL DISMISSED; WARNING ISSUED.
PUBLIC LAW 110–149—DEC. 21, 2007 121 STAT. 1819 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 72: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007): 

Dec. 19, considered and passed House and Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–149 

110th Congress 

Joint Resolution 

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2008, and for other 

purposes. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Public 

Law 110–92 is further amended by striking the date specified 

in section 106(3) and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2007’’. 

SEC. 2. Public Law 110–92 is further amended by adding at 

the end the following new sections: 

‘‘SEC. 160. Notwithstanding any other provision of this joint 

resolution, there is appropriated for payment to the heirs at law 

of Julia Carson, late a Representative from the State of Indiana, 

$165,200. 

‘‘SEC. 161. Notwithstanding section 106, the authority to provide care and services under section 1710(e)(1)(E) of title 38, United 

States Code, shall continue in effect through September 30, 2008. 

‘‘SEC. 162. Notwithstanding section 106, the authority provided 

by section 2306(d)(3) of title 38, United States Code, shall continue 

in effect through September 30, 2008.’’. 

Approved December 21, 2007. 

Termination 

date. 

38 USC 2300 

note. 

Termination 

date. 

38 USC 1710 

note. 

Julia Carson. 

Ante, 1454. 

Dec. 21, 2007 

[H.J. Res. 72] 


jbridges on POFP91QD1 with PUBLIC LAWS