alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1.     | This                  amended Report fully complies with the requirements of Section                  13(a) or                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                 |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| 2.     | The                  information contained in this amended Report fairly presents, in                  all                  material respects, the financial condition and result of operations                  of the                  Company. |

| Dated:                January 12, 2007 |
|----------------------------------------|

** **

| By: | */s/                Li                Te Xiao*Chief                Executive Officer and Chief                Financial Officer |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 245.410 Notice to tenants. At least 30 days before submitting a request to HUD for approval of an action described in § 245.405, the mortgagor must serve notice of the proposed covered action on the project tenants, as provided in § 245.15. The notice shall state that— ( a ) The mortgagor intends to submit a request to HUD for approval of the covered action or actions specified in the notice;
( b ) The tenants have the right to participate as provided in § 245.420, and what those rights are, including the address at which the materials required to be made available for inspection and copying under that section are to be kept;
( c ) Tenant comments on the proposed covered action may be sent to the mortgagor at a specified address or directly to the local HUD office, and comments sent to the mortgagor will be transmitted to HUD, along with the mortgagor's evaluation of them, when the request for HUD's approval is submitted;
( d ) HUD will approve or disapprove the proposed action, based upon its review of the information submitted and all tenant comments received. In the case of a proposed reduction in tenant-paid utilities, the notice must also state that HUD may adjust the proposed reduction upward or downward;
( e ) In the case of a proposed conversion of residential units, partial release of mortgage security, or major capital additions to the project, the proposed action may require the owner to request HUD approval of a rent increase; and
( f ) The mortgagor will notify the tenants of HUD's decision and it will not begin to effect any approved action (in accordance with the terms of existing leases) until at least 30 days from the date of service of the notification.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Warren Martin, Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person, will be treated as a motion to dispense with printing. Motion granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers and on a typewritten brief. The appellant is directed to file five copies of his brief and to serve one copy on the District Attorney. The appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to the October 1960 Term; appeal ordered to be placed on the calendar for October 10, 1960. Motion for assignment of counsel granted. Anthony F. Marra, Esq., 100 Centre Street, New York 13, New York, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 21.1

|Name                                                |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|1 Corporate Governance Pty Ltd.                     |  | Australia                    
|Center for Financial Research and Analysis, LLC     |  | Delaware                     
|Institutional Shareholder Services Canada Corp.     |  | Canada                       
|Institutional Shareholder Services Europe S.A.      |  | Belgium                      
|Institutional Shareholder Services France S.A.      |  | France                       
|Institutional Shareholder Services Holdings, Inc.   |  | Delaware                     
|Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc.            |  | Delaware                     
|Institutional Shareholder Services Japan K.K.       |  | Japan                        
|Institutional Shareholder Services Pty Ltd.         |  | Australia                    
|ISS Corporate Services, Inc.                        |  | Delaware                     
|ISS Europe Ltd.                                     |  | United Kingdom               
|ISS RREV, Inc.                                      |  | Delaware                     
|Investor Responsibility Research Center, Inc.       |  | Delaware                     
|Research Recommendations and Electronic Voting Ltd. |  | United Kingdom               
|RiskMetrics Group Holdings, LLC                     |  | Delaware                     
|RiskMetrics Group, Inc.                             |  | Delaware                     
|RiskMetrics Group K.K.                              |  | Japan                        
|RiskMetrics (Singapore) Pte Ltd.                    |  | Singapore                    
|RiskMetrics Solutions, Inc.                         |  | Delaware                     
|RiskMetrics (U.K.) Ltd.                             |  | United Kingdom               
|RMG-CFRA, LLC                                       |  | Delaware                     
|RMG-IRH, LLC                                        |  | Delaware                     
|Securities Class Action Services LLC                |  | Delaware                     

---



QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT 32.3**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Peter C. Mann,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that Amendment No. 1 to the AnnualReport of Prestige Brands International, LLC on Form 10-K/A for the yearended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable, and thatinformation contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all materialrespects the financial condition and results of operations of Prestige BrandsInternational, LLC.

 
|   |   /s/ PETER C. MANN                                        |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   Name: Peter C. Mann                                      |
|   |   Title: *Manager,  President and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
§ 1429.24 Place and method of filing; acknowledgement. ( a ) A document submitted to the Board pursuant to this subchapter shall be filed with the Board at the address set forth in appendix A to this chapter XIV.
( b ) A document submitted to the General Counsel pursuant to this subchapter shall be filed with the General Counsel at the address set forth in appendix A.
( c ) A document submitted to a Regional Director pursuant to this subchapter shall be filed with the appropriate regional office, as set forth in appendix A.
( d ) A document submitted to an Administrative Law Judge pursuant to this subchapter shall be filed with the appropriate Administrative Law Judge, as set forth in appendix A.
( e ) All documents filed pursuant to paragraphs (a), (b), (c) and (d) of this section shall be filed by certified mail or in person, or if the filing party is outside the United States, by the most appropriate available means.
( f ) All matters filed under paragraphs (a), (b), (c) and (d) of this section shall be printed, typed, or otherwise legibly duplicated: Carbon copies of typewritten matter will be accepted if they are clearly legible.
( g ) Documents in any proceedings under this subchapter, including correspondence, shall show the title of the proceeding and the case number, if any.
( h ) The original of each document required to be filed under this subchapter shall be signed by the party or by an attorney or representative of record for the party, or by an officer of the party, and shall contain the address and telephone number of the person signing it.
( i ) A return postal receipt may serve as acknowledgement of receipt by the Board, General Counsel, Administrative Law Judge, Regional Director, or Hearing Officer, as appropriate. The receiving officer will otherwise acknowledge receipt of documents filed only when the filing party so requests and includes an extra copy of the document or its transmittal letter which the receiving office will date stamp upon receipt and return. If return is to be made by mail, the filing party shall include a self-addressed, stamped envelope for the purpose.
CERTIFICATION

      I, ALBERT F. CASE, JR., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Turbodyne
Technologies, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. During the relevant period the other certifying officer and I were
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [Omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8238 (June 5, 2003),
Release No. 33-8392 (February 24, 2004) and Release No. 33-8545 (March 2,
2005)];

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's third fiscal quarter) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions);

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: June 4, 2007

/s/ Albert F. Case, Jr.
-----------------------
Chief Executive Officer
(2004); 

### see Moore u. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 96 Nev. 415, 417, 610

P.2d 188, 189 (1980) (determining that mandamus is not an appropriate remedy when resolution of the writ petition would not dispose of the entire controversy). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

, CA. Hardesty 

# "c29 1 04., Parraguirre J.

Douglas
cc: Hon. Scott N. Freeman, District Judge Fahrendorf, Viloria, Oliphant & Oster, LLP Zupancic Rothbone Law Group P.C. Law Offices of Jerry Carter, PC Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 19474 

### e 2
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metris Companies Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, David D. Wesselink, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ David D. WesselinkDavid D. WesselinkChairman and Chief Executive OfficerMay 9, 2005
#### § 92.215 Limitation on jurisdictions under court order.

Limitations on the use of HOME funds in connection with litigation involving discrimination or fair housing are set forth in section 224 of the Act.
Case 3:09-cv-02629-SI Document 31 Filed 07/13/10 Page 1 of 21
Case 3:09-cv-02629-SI Document 31 Filed 07/13/10 Page 2 of 21
Case 3:09-cv-02629-SI Document 31 Filed 07/13/10 Page 3 of 21
Case 3:09-cv-02629-SI Document 31 Filed 07/13/10 Page 4 of 21
Case 3:09-cv-02629-SI Document 31 Filed 07/13/10 Page 5 of 21
Case 3:09-cv-02629-SI Document 31 Filed 07/13/10 Page 6 of 21
Case 3:09-cv-02629-SI Document 31 Filed 07/13/10 Page 7 of 21
Case 3:09-cv-02629-SI Document 31 Filed 07/13/10 Page 8 of 21
Case 3:09-cv-02629-SI Document 31 Filed 07/13/10 Page 9 of 21
Case 3:09-cv-02629-SI Document 31 Filed 07/13/10 Page 10 of 21
Case 3:09-cv-02629-SI Document 31 Filed 07/13/10 Page 11 of 21
Case 3:09-cv-02629-SI Document 31 Filed 07/13/10 Page 12 of 21
Case 3:09-cv-02629-SI Document 31 Filed 07/13/10 Page 13 of 21
Case 3:09-cv-02629-SI Document 31 Filed 07/13/10 Page 14 of 21
Case 3:09-cv-02629-SI Document 31 Filed 07/13/10 Page 15 of 21
Case 3:09-cv-02629-SI Document 31 Filed 07/13/10 Page 16 of 21
Case 3:09-cv-02629-SI Document 31 Filed 07/13/10 Page 17 of 21
Case 3:09-cv-02629-SI Document 31 Filed 07/13/10 Page 18 of 21
Case 3:09-cv-02629-SI Document 31 Filed 07/13/10 Page 19 of 21
Case 3:09-cv-02629-SI Document 31 Filed 07/13/10 Page 20 of 21
Case 3:09-cv-02629-SI Document 31 Filed 07/13/10 Page 21 of 21
EXHIBIT 12.1

Polypore, Inc.  Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

|                    |                                                                                             | Post-Transactions |    | Pre-Transactions
|------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------- | -- | ----------------
|
|Earnings:           |                                                                                             |                   |    |                 
|                    | Pretax income (loss) before extraordinary items and cumulative effect of accounting changes |                   | $  | (28,199         
|                    | Fixed charges                                                                               |                   |    | 68,476          
|                    |                                                                                             |                  
|                    | Earnings as adjusted                                                                        |                   |    | 40,277          
|Fixed charges:      |                                                                                             |                   |    |                 
|                    | Interest expense, net                                                                       |                   |    | 67,857          
|                    | Interest portion of rental expense                                                          |                   |    | 619             
|                    |                                                                                             |                  
|                    | Fixed charges                                                                               |                   |    | 68,476          
|Fixed charges ratio |                                                                                             |                   | (1 | )               
|                    |                                                                                             |                  

---

For
purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings consist of earnings before income taxes plus fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense, amortization of debt
issuance costs and the portion of rental expense that management believes is representative of the interest component of rental expense.

---



QuickLinks
|
|

12 ASO, COS

RY 5 METERS CONTOURS

UR INTERVAL 10 METERS ©
OWER LOW WATER

ATHYMETRIC CONTO
WITH SUPPLEMENTA
DATUM 1S MEAN L

B

3 8 «
§ 8 8 &

COPALIS. BEACH, WA. WL W-/

=

Fong |
ee

INDEX To Aosol
gs" OINING SHEETS,
e
FLAT
NM Y i
COPAL
seacu | | 8%
NL 104
CAPE
loisaPeouT men]
‘el NL 10-4
‘as
EXTENSION AGREEMENT

 

Extension Agreement made this 28th day of October 2022, by and between Mycotopia Therapies Inc., a Florida corporation (“Mycotopia”) and HAVN Life Sciences Inc., a Canadian corporation (“HAVN”).

 

WHEREAS, on August 13, 2020, Mycotopia and HAVN entered into a Psilocybin Supply Agreement (the “Supply Agreement”); and

 

WHEREAS, each of Mycotopia and HAVN desire to extend the term of the Supply Agreement.

 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual obligations and promises contained herein, the parties agree:

 

1.The Supply agreement shall be extended for a term of two years from the date hereof and shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless canceled by either party on not less than 30 days’ notice prior to the end of such term.  

 

2.Other Terms Unchanged. The Supply Agreement, as amended by this Extension Agreement, remains and continues in full force and effect, constitutes legal, valid, and binding obligations of each of the parties, and is in all respects agreed to, ratified, and confirmed. Any reference to the Supply Agreement is deemed to be a reference to the Supply Agreement as amended by this Extension Agreement. If there is a conflict between the terms of this Extension Agreement and the Supply Agreement, the terms of this Extension Agreement shall control.  

3.Counterparts. This Extension Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one instrument. The parties hereto confirm that any electronic copy of another party’s executed counterpart of this Amendment (or such party’s signature page thereof) will be deemed to be an executed original thereof.  

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of HAVN and Mycotopia has caused this instrument to be executed by its duly authorized officer as of the date first above written. 

 

 

	HAVN LIFE SCIENCES INC.

	MYCOTOPIA THERAPIES INC.


	 

	 


	By: /s/ Tim Moore

	By:/s/ Ben Kaplan


	Name: Tim Moore

	Name: Ben Kaplan


	Title: CEO

	Title: CEO
#### John M. Armstrong et al., Suing on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Stockholders Similarly Situated and on Behalf and in the Right of Canadian Javelin Limited, Respondents, and Milton Berman, Suing on Behalf of Himself and All Other Stockholders Similarly Situated and on Behalf and in the Right of Canadian Javelin Limited, et al., Appellants, v. John C. Doyle et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. Canadian Javelin Limited, Plaintiff, v. John C. Doyle et al., Defendants.

Judgment entered on August 16, 1961 unanimously modified on the law to the extent of striking out the last decretal paragraph and as so modified is affirmed, without costs. The retention of juris*917diction by the court as provided for in the last decretal paragraph may not be sustained. Such provision could well result in a complete breakdown of the normal functioning of the board of directors. It would, in effect, make the court a member of the board. Interference by courts with the normal internal management of business corporations is improper (see *Chelrob, Inc.,*V. *Barrett,*293 N. Y. 442, 459-460; *Flynn*v. *Brooklyn City R. R. Co.,*158 N. Y. 493, 507). Any subsequent improprieties or irregularities may be remedied by the institution of an appropriate independent action or proceeding. Concur — Rabin, J. P., McNally, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ. Motion to dismiss appeal denied. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.
### §901. Congressional Record: arrangement, style, contents, and indexes

The Joint Committee on Printing shall control the arrangement and style of the Congressional Record, and while providing that it shall be substantially a verbatim report of proceedings, shall take all needed action for the reduction of unnecessary bulk. It shall provide for the publication of an index of the Congressional Record semimonthly during and at the close of sessions of Congress.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1255.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §181 (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §13, 28 Stat. 603).
## Court of Appeals

Twelfth Court of Appeals District at Tyler



## B I L L O F C O S T S

Court of Appeals No. 12-15-00090-CV

Trial Court No. 349-7331

George A. Hall

Vs.

The County of Anderson

DOCUMENTS FILED AMOUNT FEE PAID BY

Clerk's record

Indigent

Required Texas.gov efiling fee

Supreme Court chapter 51 fee

Filing $33.00

$25.00

$20.00

$50.00

$100.00 Unknown

Dismissed, not paid

Dismissed, not paid

Dismissed, not paid

Dismissed, not paid

TOTAL: $228.00

I, Cathy S. Lusk, Clerk of the Court of Appeals, Twelfth Court of Appeals District at Tyler,

Texas, certify that the above copy of the Bill of Costs is true and correct. GIVEN UNDER MY

HAND AND SEAL OF SAID COURT, at Tyler, this 24th day of August 2015

, A.D.

CATHY LUSK, CLERK

By:

_____________________________ Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk