alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Transitional Report of Rand Logistics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


July 14, 2006                                      By: /s/ Joseph W. McHugh Jr.
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Joseph W. McHugh Jr.
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
§ 3285.103 Site suitability with design zone maps. Prior to the initial installation of a new manufactured home and as part of making the certification of the installation required under part 3286, upon effect, the installer is to verify that the design and construction of the manufactured home, as indicated on the design zone maps provided with the home, are suitable for the site location where the home is to be installed. The design zone maps are those identified in part 3280 of this chapter. ( a ) *Wind zone.* Manufactured homes must not be installed in a wind zone that exceeds the design wind loads for which the home has been designed, as evidenced by the wind zone indicated on the home's data plate and as further defined by counties or local governments within affected states, as applicable, in § 3280.305(c)(2) of the Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards in this chapter.
( b ) *Roof load zone.* Manufactured homes must not be located in a roof load zone that exceeds the design roof load for which the home has been designed, as evidenced by the roof load zone indicated on the home's data plate and as further defined by counties or local governments within affected states, as applicable, in § 3280.305(c)(3) of the Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards in this chapter. Refer to § 3285.315 for Special Snow Load Conditions.
( c ) *Thermal zone.* Manufactured homes must not be installed in a thermal zone that exceeds the thermal zone for which the home has been designed, as evidenced by the thermal zone indicated on the heating/cooling certificate and insulation zone map and as further defined by counties or local governments within affected states, as applicable, in § 3280.504(b)(5) of the Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards in this chapter. The manufacturer may provide the heating/cooling information and insulation zone map on the home's data plate.
Rule 1921. Notice to the Chief Justice and [to] the Judicial Conduct Board.

Whenever a judge receives notice that he or she is the subject of any federal or 

state criminal investigation or prosecution through a target letter, a subject 

letter, a presentment, an indictment, an arrest, a summons, a complaint, [or by 

any] other legal process, or any other means from the investigating or 

prosecuting authority, unless precluded by order of court, the judge must 

report the receipt of such notice in writing to the Chief Justice and [to] the 

Judicial Conduct Board within five (5) days.
§ 232.850 Notice of default. ( a ) If the default is not cured within the 30 day grace period, as defined in § 232.830(c), the lender shall, within 30 days thereafter, notify the Commissioner in writing of such default.
( b ) The lender shall give notice in writing to the Commissioner of the failure of the borrower to comply with any covenant or obligation under the security instrument or note regardless of the fact that the lender may not have elected to accelerate the debt.
(39 Misc. Rep. 646.)

#### In re CULLINAN, Excise Com’r.

(Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

January, 1903.)

1. Liquor Tax Certificate — Application.

A statement in an application for the transfer of a liquor tax certificate that the applicant intended to conduct a hotel, and that the building in which he was to carry on such business complied with the statutory requirements as to a hotel, is material.

'3. Same — Cancellation.

Where, on application to cancel a liquor tax certificate for false statement that the building complied with the statutory provisions as to a hotel, the answer failed to deny such allegation, the court will, without reference, and on proof of formal matters, revoke the certificate.

Application by Patrick W. Cullinan, State Commissioner of Excise, for an order revoking a liquor tax certificate issued to Thomas .Eustace, and transferred to John Campbell.

Granted.

H. N. Kellogg, for petitioner.

Guggenheimer, Untermyer & Marshall, for respondent.

*627BLANCHARD, J.

This is an application by the State Commissioner of Excise for an order revoking and canceling a liquor tax certificate for false 'statements made by Campbell in his application for a transfer of a license' to him. The false statements claimed by the petitioner are in answer to questions 20, 24, and 25. The respondent stated in his answer to these questions that he intended to “carry on a bona fide hotel” on the premises, and that such hotel complied with the requisites provided by the statute for hotels. The answer, in effect, denies that any material statement was false. It does not contain any denial of the fact that the building did not comply with the statute. The respondent is bound by the statements in his application as to the nature of the license sought, and he cannot now claim it was not for the purpose as stated in the application. Matter of Barnard, 48 App. Div. 423, 63 N. Y. Supp. 255. In this aspect of the case, the compliance of the building in which the traffic in liquor was to be conducted with the requisites provided by the statute was material, and the failure of the answer to contain a sufficient denial of the alleged false statements entitles the petitioner to the relief sought. Liquor Tax Law (Laws 1896, c. 112, § 28, as amended by Laws 1901, c. 640, § 5). As no issue is presented except as to matters of formal proof, no reference is necessary. Matter of Auerbach, 31 Misc. Rep. 44, 64 N. Y. Supp. 602; Matter of Bridge, 36 App. Div. 533, 55 N. Y. Supp. 54. The proof on the formal matters may be made to the court before the final order of revocation is made. The application of the petitioner should be granted.

Application granted.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (the Company), each hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)
The Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: February 21, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Steven R. Goldman  
|                        |  |  |  | Steven R. Goldman      
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                        |  | 
|Date: February 21, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Kenneth E. Cruse   
|                        |  |  |  | Kenneth E. Cruse       
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Reportof Neenah Paper, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the periodended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sean T. Erwin, President andChief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Bonnie C. Lind, Senior VicePresident, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/    | Sean T. Erwin                                                 |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Sean T. Erwin                                                 |
|   |   | Chairman of the  Board, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   | (Principal  Executive Officer)                                |
|   |   | Date:  March 10, 2010                                    |
|   |   |                                                          |
|   | /s/    | Bonnie C. Lind                                                |
|   |   | Bonnie C. Lind                                                |
|   |   | Senior Vice  President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|   |   | (Principal  Financial Officer)                                |
|   |   | Date:  March 10, 2010                                    |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the filing of the Annual Report of Rand Logistics, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2010 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: June 15, 2010/s/ Joseph W. McHugh, Jr.Joseph W. McHugh, Jr.

Chief Financial Officer
#### § 906.49 HUD approval; implementing agreement.

HUD may approve a homeownership program as submitted, conditionally approve it under § 906.47(e), or return it to the PHA for revision and resubmission. Where such conditional approval is given, the PHA, partners, and contractors remain subject to the restrictions in § 906.47. Upon HUD notification to the PHA that the homeownership program is approvable (in final form that satisfies all applicable requirements of this part), the PHA and HUD will execute a written implementing agreement, in a form prescribed by HUD, to evidence HUD approval and authorization for implementation. The program itself, as approved by HUD, must be incorporated in the implementing agreement. Any of the items of supporting documentation may also be incorporated, if agreeable to the PHA and HUD. The PHA is obligated to carry out the approved homeownership program and other provisions of the implementing agreement without modification, except with written approval by HUD.
**EXHIBIT 99.9**

**News Release****August 21, 2000****Trading Symbols:**TRBD (EASDAQ) 

**EASDAQ MAINTAINS TURBODYNE’S SUSPENSION**

**Carpinteria, California—August 21, 2000**—Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. (EASDAQ:TRBD) reports that on August 2, 2000 EASDAQ suspended trading of the shares of Turbodyne Technologies, Inc., pendingclarification of the facts underlying Turbodyne’s press release dated August 1, 2000. 

On August 17, 2000, the EASDAQ Market Authority reviewed the decision to suspend and decided to maintain the suspension pending further investigation. Such suspension will remain in effect until October 3, 2000,unless otherwise determined by the Market Authority.

Turbodyne Technologies, Inc., a California based high technology company, specializes in the development of charging technology for internal combustion engines plus the development and manufacturing of high-tech assemblies forelectrically assisted turbochargers and superchargers. Turbodyne Technologies, Inc.’s is located in Carpinteria, CA; the European business location is Frankfurt, Germany.

Contacts:

Kenneth Fitzpatrick, VP Group Finance—Investor Relations: (805) 684-4551Markus Kumbrink, Turbodyne Europe Investor Relations: +49-69-69-76-73-13

****

----
```

[110th Congress Public Law 107]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ107.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 1023]]

Public Law 110-107
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 Highway 49 South in Piney Woods, Mississippi, as the ``Laurence C. and 
 Grace M. Jones Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Oct. 26, 2007 -  [H.R. 
                                3233]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LAURENCE C. AND GRACE M. JONES POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at Highway 49 South in Piney Woods, Mississippi, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Laurence C. and Grace M. Jones Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Laurence C. 
and Grace M. Jones Post Office Building''.

    Approved October 26, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3233 (S. 2131):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            Oct. 1, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 19, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32

      Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350), the
undersigned, David J Cutler, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of Aspeon, Inc., (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report Form 10QSB for the three months ended September 30, 2001 of
the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1034, and the information  contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Date:       September 19, 2006

By /s/David J Cutler
   ----------------------
David J Cutler
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
### SUBCHAPTER III—VIRGIN ISLANDS CORPORATION
### §53719. Best practices

The Secretary or Administrator shall ensure that all standard documents and agreements that relate to loan guarantees made pursuant to this chapter are reviewed and updated every four years to ensure that such documents and agreements meet the current commercial best practices to the extent permitted by law.

(Added Pub. L. 116–92, div. C, title XXXV, §3506(i)(1), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1973.)
Jonathan B. Hill

+1 202 776 2725

jhill@cooley.com

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM

May 5, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590

Re: FAA Docket 2015-0297-0001 (Chapman Aerospace LLC)

Dear Sir or Madam:

On February 3, 2015, the undersigned on behalf of their client Chapman Aerospace LLC 

(“Chapman”) filed an application for a Section 333 Exemption in the captioned docket. That 

exemption requested authority to undertake commercial aerial data collection and closed set 

filming for television and movie industry. On April 15, 2015, the undersigned submitted 

confidentially its Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM).

Submitted with this request for additional authority is a revised sUAS Flight Operations

Manual, Confidential Exhibit 1 submitted on February 3, 2105. This Confidential Manual, 

Confidential Exhibit 1A, adds additional use cases that will be employed as described in Section 

16, including Wind Turbine; Oil Rig and Platform Inspection; Vessel Inspections and Disaster 

Response. Section 17 addresses Tethering Operations with a minimum distance for operations 

of 100 feet.

A Chapman request that this manual be incorporated into the existing exemption request 

and refers the FAA to the entire docket and associated manuals for establishment of equivalent 
May 5, 2015

Page Two

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM

levels of safety for each of the proposed operations. We requests that the FAA grant Chapman 

an exemption allowing operations as described in the entire docket.

Sincerely,

Jonathan B. Hill

Cooley LLP

Counsel for Chapman Aerospace, LLC

John McGraw

John McGraw Aerospace Consulting, LLC 

Agent for Chapman Aerospace, LLC

Encl.

cc: James Williams

Robert Pappas

Jake Troutman

Dean Griffith, Esq.

Thuy H. Cooper

Justin Chapman

116581549 v1

05/05/15
Exhibit 1A

(Filed as Confidential)
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of JCC Holding Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Paul D. Debban, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
my knowledge that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date: November 14, 2002                               /s/ Paul D. Debban
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Paul D. Debban
                                                      President
### §6309. Voyage data recorder access

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Coast Guard shall have full, concurrent, and timely access to and ability to use voyage data recorder data and audio held by any Federal agency in all marine casualty investigations, regardless of which agency is the investigative lead.

(Added Pub. L. 115–265, title II, §207(a), Oct. 11, 2018, 132 Stat. 3747.)
### §14303. Tonnage Certificate

(a) After measuring a vessel under this chapter, the Secretary shall issue, on request of the owner, an International Tonnage Certificate (1969) and deliver it to the owner or master of the vessel. For a vessel to which the Convention does not apply, the Secretary shall prescribe a certificate to be issued as evidence of a vessel's measurement under this chapter.

(b) The certificate issued under this section shall be maintained as required by the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 99–509, title V, §5101(3), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1921; Pub. L. 111–281, title III, §303(e)(1), Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 2925.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### Revised section 14303

Source: International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships.

Section 14303(a) requires the Secretary to issue, on the request of the owner, an International Tonnage Certificate after measuring a vessel under this chapter. Section 14303(b) requires that the certificate be maintained as required by the Secretary.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–281, §303(e)(1)(C), struck out "International" before "Tonnage" and "(1969)" after "Certificate" in section catchline.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 111–281, §303(e)(1)(A), inserted at end "For a vessel to which the Convention does not apply, the Secretary shall prescribe a certificate to be issued as evidence of a vessel's measurement under this chapter."

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 111–281, §303(e)(1)(B), inserted "issued under this section" after "The certificate".
### §40902. Financial responsibility

(a) In General.—A person may not advertise, hold oneself out, or act as an ocean transportation intermediary unless the person furnishes a bond, proof of insurance, or other surety—

(1) in a form and amount determined by the Federal Maritime Commission to insure financial responsibility; and

(2) issued by a surety company found acceptable by the Secretary of the Treasury.

(b) Scope of Financial Responsibility.—A bond, insurance, or other surety obtained under this section—

(1) shall be available to pay any penalty assessed under section 41109 of this title or any order for reparation issued under section 41305 of this title;

(2) may be available to pay any claim against an ocean transportation intermediary arising from its transportation-related activities—

(A) with the consent of the insured ocean transportation intermediary and subject to review by the surety company; or

(B) when the claim is deemed valid by the surety company after the ocean transportation intermediary has failed to respond to adequate notice to address the validity of the claim; and

(3) shall be available to pay any judgment for damages against an ocean transportation intermediary arising from its transportation-related activities, if the claimant has first attempted to resolve the claim under paragraph (2) and the claim has not been resolved within a reasonable period of time.

(c) Regulations on Court Judgments.—The Commission shall prescribe regulations for the purpose of protecting the interests of claimants, ocean transportation intermediaries, and surety companies with respect to the process of pursuing claims against ocean transportation intermediary bonds, insurance, or sureties through court judgments. The regulations shall provide that a judgment for monetary damages may not be enforced except to the extent that the damages claimed arise from the transportation-related activities of the insured ocean transportation intermediary, as defined by the Commission.

(d) Resident Agent.—An ocean transportation intermediary not domiciled in the United States shall designate a resident agent in the United States for receipt of service of judicial and administrative process, including subpoenas.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §7, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1538; Pub. L. 115–282, title VII, §707(c), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4295.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 40902 | 46 App.:1718(b). | Pub. L. 98–237, §19(b), Mar. 20, 1984; added Pub. L. 105–258, title I, §116(4), Oct. 14, 1998, 112 Stat. 1913. |

Section

In subsection (b), in paragraphs (2) and (3), the words "described in section 1702(17) of this Appendix" are omitted as unnecessary.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–282 inserted "advertise, hold oneself out, or" after "may not" in introductory provisions.