alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 891.140 Development cost limits. ( a ) HUD shall use the development cost limits, established by Notice in the Federal Register and adjusted by locality, to calculate the fund reservation amount of the capital advance to be made available to individual Owners. Owners that incur actual development costs that are less than the amount of the initial fund reservation shall be entitled to retain 50 percent of the savings in a Replacement Reserve Account. Such percentage shall be increased to 75 percent for Owners that add energy efficiency features.
( b ) The Replacement Reserve Account established under paragraph (a) of this section may only be used for repairs, replacements, and capital improvements to the project.
Motion Granted; Order filed April 9, 2020 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00826-CR

____________

DANIEL VICTOR SALDANA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 228th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1541510

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the 

appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant filed a motion requesting

to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The motion is 

granted.
Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 228th District Court to afford 

appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local 

procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before

April 24, 2020; that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which 

delivery of the record to appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief 

with this court within thirty days of that date.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Spain.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT - 11.01
STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE DATA

                         FIREARMS TRAINING SYSTEMS, INC.
          STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                                 (In thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  BASIC EARNINGS                     DILUTED EARNINGS
                                                     PER SHARE                           PER SHARE
                                                 SIX MONTHS ENDED                    SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                   SEPTEMBER 30,                       SEPTEMBER 30,
                                           ---------------------------         ---------------------------
                                             2000              1999              2000              1999
                                           ---------------------------         ---------------------------
<S>                                        <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>
Weighted average common and common
   shares outstanding                         37,383            20,746            37,383            20,746

Shares issued upon assumed exercise
   of outstanding options                         --                --                --                --
                                           ---------         ---------         ---------         ---------

Weighted average common and common
   equivalent shares outstanding              37,383            20,746            37,383            20,746

Net income                                 $ (10,126)        $  (4,007)        $ (10,126)        $  (4,007)
                                           =========         =========         =========         =========

Earnings per share                         $   (0.27)        $   (0.19)        $   (0.27)        $   (0.19)
                                           =========         =========         =========         =========
</TABLE>



                                    Page 58
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited balance sheets and unaudited statements of operations found on pages
3 and 4 of the Company's Form 10-QSB for the year to date, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                              94
<SECURITIES>                                         0      
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    94
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     281
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,623
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           125
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (3,217)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       281 
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,970
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,970)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,970)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
### §944. Right of way in Oklahoma and Arizona

Where, under sections 934 to 939 of this title, or under special Acts of Congress, or under the laws of the former Territories of Oklahoma and Arizona, railroads have been constructed and were on June 26, 1906, in operation in Oklahoma or Arizona which passed through any of the lands theretofore reserved for said Territories, such lands shall be disposed of subject to such railroad right or easement, but only to the extent of the right of way conferred by the said sections for such railroad purposes.

(June 26, 1906, ch. 3548, 34 Stat. 481.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeal; Savings Provision

Section repealed by Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §706(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2793, effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976, insofar as applicable to the issuance of rights-of-way over, upon, under, and through the public lands and lands in the National Forest System. Such repeal not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
§ 891.830 Drawdown. ( a ) Upon its approval of the executed mixed-finance closing documents and other documents submitted and upon determining that such documents are satisfactory, and after the capital advance closing, HUD may approve the drawdown of capital advance funds in accordance with the HUD-approved drawdown schedule.
( b ) Non-capital advance funds may be disbursed before capital advance proceeds or the capital advance funds may be drawn down in an approved ratio to other funds, in accordance with a drawdown schedule approved by HUD.
( c ) Each drawdown of funds constitutes a certification by the mixed-finance owner that: ( 1 ) All the representations and warranties submitted in accordance with this subpart continue to be valid, true, and in full force and effect;
( 2 ) All parties are in compliance with their obligations pursuant to this subpart, which, by their terms, are applicable at the time of the drawdown of funds;
( 3 ) All conditions precedent to the drawdown of the funds by the mixed-finance owner have been satisfied;
( 4 ) The capital advance funds drawn down will be used only for eligible costs actually incurred in accordance with the provisions of this subpart and the approved mixed-finance project, which include costs stated in 12 U.S.C. 1701q(h) and 42 U.S.C. 8013(h). Capital advance funds may be used for paying off bridge or construction financing, or repaying or collateralizing bonds, but only for the portion of such financing or bonds that was used for capital advance units; and
( 5 ) The amount of the drawdown is consistent with the ratio of 202 or 811 supportive housing units to other units.
[70 FR 54210, Sept. 13, 2005, as amended at 78 FR 37114, June 20, 2013]
| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,                and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of                Registrant. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                 |                                          |                               |
|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                                      |                                          | /s/              Vincent Colangelo |
|                                 | Name:                Vincent Colangelo        |
|                                 | Title:                Chief Financial Officer |
|                                 |                                          |
| Dated:                March 27, 2008 |                                          |

----
#### § 206.109 Amount of mortgagee share of premium.

Using the factors provided by the Commissioner, the amount of the mortgagee share of the premium shall be determined for each mortgage based upon the age of the youngest borrower or Eligible Non-Borrowing Spouse and the expected average mortgage interest rate.
To the Board of Directors of
Berwyn Income Fund, Inc.


In planning and performing our audit of the
financial statements of Berwyn Income Fund, Inc.
(the "Fund") for the year ended December 31, 1995,
we considered its internal control structure,
including procedures for safeguarding securities,
in order to determine our auditing procedures for
the purposes of expressing our opinion on the
financial statement and to comply with the
requirements of Form N-SAR, and not to provide
assurance on the internal control structure.

The management of the Fund is responsible for
establishing and maintaining an internal control
structure.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required
to assess the expected benefits and related costs
of internal control structure policies and
procedures.  Two of the objectives of an internal
control structure are to provide management with
reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that assets
are appropriately safeguarded against loss from
unauthorized use or disposition and that
transactions are executed in accordance with
management's authorization and recorded properly to
permit preparation of financial statements in
conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal
control structure, errors or irregularities may
occur and may not be detected.  Also, projection of
any evaluation of the structure to future periods
is subject to the risk that it may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions or that
the effectiveness of the design and operation may
deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control structure
would not necessarily disclose all matters in the
internal control structure that might be material
weaknesses under standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
A material weakness is a condition in which the
design or operation of the specific internal
control structure elements does not reduce to a
relatively low level the risk that errors or
irregularities in amounts that would be material in
relation to the financial statements being audited
may occur and not be detected within a timely
period by employees in the normal course of
performing their assigned functions.  However, we
noted no matters involving the internal control
structure, including procedures for safeguarding
securities, that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above as of December 31,
1995.

This report is intended solely for the information
and use of management and the Securities and
Exchange Commission.



PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
Thirty South Seventeenth Street
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 8, 1996
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph Boyle, Appellant.

In a *coram nobis*proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the County Court, Kings County, dated February 9, 1961, which denied, without a hearing, his application for a review of two of his prior foreign convictions on the basis of which he was allegedly adjudged a fifth felony offender. Order affirmed. No opinion. (See *People*v. *Boyle,*16 A D 2d 942.) Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: October 14, 2008
    
    /s/ Robert K. MoskovitzName:
    Robert K. MoskovitzTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner
§ 902.40 Management operations assessment. ( a ) *Objective.* The objective of the management operations indicator is to measure the PHA's performance of management operations through the management performance of each project.
( b ) *Exclusions.* Mixed-finance projects are excluded from the management operations indicator.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.2


                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Richard V. Secord, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Computerized Thermal
Imaging, Inc. ("CTI");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and;

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  February 11, 2005

/s/ Richard V. Secord
------------------------
Richard V. Secord
Acting Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

_________________________________

)

JUANITA E. SUGUITAN, )

 ) 

 Plaintiff, )

 )

 v. ) Civil Action No. 12-1671 (EGS)

 ) 

COMMISSIONER OF )

SOCIAL SECURITY )

ADMINISTRATION, )

)

 Defendants )

_________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

It is undisputed in this case brought under the Social Security Act that plaintiff did not 

apply for the wife’s insurance benefits sought from the Complaint. See Def.’s Mot. for Judgment 

of Dismissal [Dkt. # 24], Decl. of Patrick J. Herbst ¶ 9. The Social Security Act authorizes 

judicial review of a “final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security made after a hearing 

to which [the plaintiff] was a party[.]” 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). “The requirement that a plaintiff 

must first present [her] claim to the agency is jurisdictional and cannot be waived[.]” Cost v. 

Soc. Sec. Admin., 770 F. Supp. 2d 45, 48 (D.D.C.) aff'd, No. 11-5132, 2011 WL 6759544 (D.C. 

Cir. Dec. 2, 2011) (citing Bowen v. City of New York, 476 U.S. 467, 483)) (other citation 

omitted). Hence, the Court has no choice but to dismiss this case for want of subject matter 

jurisdiction. A separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion. 

DATE: March 25, 2015 SIGNED: EMMET G. SULLIVAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No.
333-127086 on Form F-3 of our reports dated May 20, 2008, which report expresses
unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the
Company's change in accounting policy for dry-docking costs in the fourth
quarter of 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Top Ships
Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”), and the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007.














/s/
Deloitte.


Hadjipavlou,
Sofianos & Cambanis S.A.


Athens,
Greece


May 21,
2008











SK 23116 0001
885269
#### Stephanie G. Peters, as Administratrix, Respondent, v. Thomas D. Powell et al., Appellants.

Appeal dismissed unless printed briefs are filed and served on or before September 22, 1960.
#### § 891.175 Technical assistance.

For purposes of the Section 202 Program and the Section 811 Program, the Secretary shall make available appropriate technical assistance to assure that applicants having limited resources, particularly minority applicants, are able to participate more fully in the programs.
#### § 1202.101 Standards for reporting and paying royalties.

Oil volumes are to be reported in barrels of clean oil of 42 standard U.S. gallons (231 cubic inches each) at 60 °F. When reporting oil volumes for royalty purposes, corrections must have been made for Basic Sediment and Water (BS&W) and other impurities. Reported American Petroleum Institute (API) oil gravities are to be those determined in accordance with standard industry procedures after correction to 60 °F.

[53 FR 1217, Jan. 15, 1988]
DISMISSED and Opinion Filed March 28, 2013.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-12-01509-CV

JEFFERY & GERALLYNN LONGINO, Appellants

V.

WILLIAM R. EGAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 006-2699-2012

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang-Miers, Murphy, and Fillmore 

Opinion by Justice Murphy

After numerous delays in obtaining the record in this case, the time for filing appellants’ 

brief has expired. By postcard dated March 8, 2013, we notified appellants the time for filing 

their brief had expired and directed appellants to file a brief within ten days. We cautioned 

appellants that failure to file the brief and an extension motion within the time allowed would 

result in the dismissal of this case. To date, appellants have not filed their brief, an extension 

motion, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b)(c).

121509F.P05

/Mary Murphy/

MARY MURPHY

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

JEFFERY & GERALLYNN LONGINO, 

Appellants

No. 05-12-01509-CV V.

WILLIAM R. EGAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 6, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 006-2699-2012.

Opinion delivered by Justice Murphy. 

Justices Lang-Miers and Fillmore 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee WILLIAM R. EGAN recover his costs of this appeal from 

appellants JEFFERY & GERALLYNN LONGINO.

Judgment entered this 28th day of March, 2013.

/Mary Murphy/

MARY MURPHY

JUSTICE
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 128583 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 128583 COA: 261421 Wayne CC: 88-004878-01 ADRIAN CARLTON HAMILTON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 1, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

p1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk