Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 236 / Tuesday, December 8, 2020 / Notices 78989 

performance of these agencies and 

provide technical guidance as needed. 

Official services under the AMA are 

performed, upon request, on a fee basis 

for domestic and export shipments 

either by FGIS employees, individual 

contractors, or cooperators. Contractors 

are persons who enter into a contract 

with FGIS to perform specified 

sampling and inspection services. 

Cooperators are agencies or departments 

of the Federal Government which have 

an interagency agreement, State 

agencies, or other entities which have a 

reimbursable agreement with FGIS. 

Title: Reporting and Recordkeeping 

Requirements (United States Grain 

Standards Act and Agricultural 

Marketing Act of 1946). 

OMB Number: 0581–0309. 

Expiration Date of Approval: January 

31, 2021. 

Type of Request: Extension and 

revision of a currently approved 

information collection. 

Abstract: The USGSA and the AMA 

authorize USDA to inspect, certify and 

identify the class, quality, quantity and 

condition of agricultural products 

shipped or received in interstate and 

foreign commerce. 

Estimate of Burden: Public reporting 

and record keeping burden for this 

collection of information is estimated to 

average .13 hours per response. 

Respondents: Grain producers, 

buyers, and sellers, elevator operators, 

grain merchandisers, and official grain 

inspection agencies. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

8,666. 

Estimated Number of Responses per 

Respondent: 143. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden on 

Respondents: 161,614 hours. 

As required by the PRA (44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(2)(A)) and its implementing 

regulations (5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1)(i)), AMS 

specifically requests comments on: (1) 

Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

agency, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

(2) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate 

of the burden of the proposed collection 

of information including the validity of 

the methodology and assumptions used; 

(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, 

and clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (4) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on those who are to respond, including 

the use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

All responses to this notice will be 

summarized and included in the request 

for OMB approval. All comments will 

become a matter of public record. 

Bruce Summers, 

Administrator, Agricultural Marketing 

Service. 

[FR Doc. 2020–26882 Filed 12–7–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

December 3, 2020. 

The Department of Agriculture has 

submitted the following information 

collection requirement(s) to Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and clearance under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 

Public Law 104–13. Comments are 

requested regarding: Whether the 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of burden including 

the validity of the methodology and 

assumptions used; ways to enhance the 

quality, utility and clarity of the 

information to be collected; ways to 

minimize the burden of the collection of 

information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

Comments regarding this information 

collection received by January 7, 2021 

will be considered. Written comments 

and recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be 

submitted within 30 days of the 

publication of this notice on the 

following website www.reginfo.gov/ 

public/do/PRAMain. Find this 

particular information collection by 

selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day 

Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or 

by using the search function. 

An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor a collection of information 

unless the collection of information 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number and the agency informs 

potential persons who are to respond to 

the collection of information that such 

persons are not required to respond to 

the collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number. 

Rural Utilities Service 

Title: 7 CFR part 1738 Rural 

Broadband Loans, Loan/Grant 

Combinations, and Loan Guarantees. 

OMB Control Number: 0572–0154. 

Summary of Collection: The Rural 

Utilities Service (RUS), is authorized by 

Title VI, Rural Broadband Access, of the 

Rural Electrification Act of 1936, as 

amended (RE Act), to provide loans, 

loan/grant combinations and loan 

guarantees to fund the cost of 

construction, improvement, or 

acquisition of facilities and equipment 

for the provision of broadband service 

in eligible rural areas in the States and 

Territories of the United States. 7 CFR 

part 1738 prescribes the types of loans 

available, facilities financed, and 

eligible applicants, as well as minimum 

equity requirements to be considered for 

a loan. In addition, 7 CFR part 1738 

outlines the process through which RUS 

will consider applicants under the 

priority consideration required in Title 

VI. 

The term of the loan or loan/grant 

combination is based on the expected 

composite economic life based on the 

depreciation rates of the facilities 

financed. The term of the loan or loan/ 

grant combination can be as high as 35 

years. These loans are secured by a first 

lien on the borrower’s broadband 

system. In the interest of protecting loan 

security and accomplishing the 

statutory objective of a sound program 

of rural broadband service access, Title 

VI of the RE Act further requires that 

RUS make or guarantee a loan only if 

there is reasonable assurance that the 

loan, together with all outstanding loans 

and obligations of the borrower, will be 

repaid in full within the time agreed; 

the information gathered in this 

collection will help RUS determine that 

reasonable assurance. 

This package will replace 0572–0130 

and incorporates all the new 

requirements from the 2018 Farm Bill. 

This package also covers the Public 

Notice requirements for the 

telecommunication infrastructure and 

the Community Connect program. All 

other burden associated with those two 

programs will remain under their 

current packages. 

Need and Use of the Information: The 

information in the program application 

guide—RUS Bulletin 1738–1 provides 

applicants with needed information, 

definitions and details for completing 

and submitting an application. The 

information in the application will be 

used to determine: Applicant eligibility, 

availability of broadband service for 

priority consideration, technical and 

economic feasibility of the proposed 

project (that the funds requested are 

adequate to complete the project taking 

into consideration any additional 

funding provided by the applicant and 

that the loan can be repaid within the 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
78990 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 236 / Tuesday, December 8, 2020 / Notices 

1See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; 

Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 

39263 (July 6, 2011). 

2See Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015, 

Public Law 114–27, 129 Stat. 362 (2015). 

allowable time frame), loan/grant 

combination eligibility, and applicant 

compliance with certain Federal 

regulations and requirements. 

Description of Respondents: Business 

or other for-profit; Not-for-profit 

institutions. 

Number of Respondents: 50. 

Frequency of Responses: Reporting: 

On occasion. 

Total Burden Hours: 20,942. 

Levi S. Harrell, 

Departmental Information Collection 

Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2020–26923 Filed 12–7–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) has received requests to 

conduct administrative reviews of 

various antidumping duty (AD) and 

countervailing duty (CVD) orders and 

findings with October anniversary dates. 

In accordance with Commerce’s 

regulations, we are initiating those 

administrative reviews. 

DATES: Applicable December 8, 2020. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brenda E. Brown, AD/CVD Operations, 

Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230, telephone: 

(202) 482–4735. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce has received timely 

requests, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(b), for administrative reviews of 

various AD and CVD orders and 

findings with October anniversary dates. 

All deadlines for the submission of 

various types of information, 

certifications, or comments or actions by 

Commerce discussed below refer to the 

number of calendar days from the 

applicable starting time. 

Notice of No Sales 

If a producer or exporter named in 

this notice of initiation had no exports, 

sales, or entries during the period of 

review (POR), it must notify Commerce 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register. All 

submissions must be filed electronically 

at https://access.trade.gov in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.303.1 Such 

submissions are subject to verification 

in accordance with section 782(i) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.303(f)(1)(i), a copy must be served 

on every party on Commerce’s service 

list. 

Respondent Selection 

In the event Commerce limits the 

number of respondents for individual 

examination for administrative reviews 

initiated pursuant to requests made for 

the orders identified below, Commerce 

intends to select respondents based on 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) data for U.S. imports during the 

POR. We intend to place the CBP data 

on the record within five days of 

publication of the initiation notice and 

to make our decision regarding 

respondent selection within 30 days of 

publication of the initiation Federal 

Register notice. Comments regarding the 

CBP data and respondent selection 

should be submitted within seven days 

after the placement of the CBP data on 

the record of this review. Parties 

wishing to submit rebuttal comments 

should submit those comments within 

five days after the deadline for the 

initial comments. 

In the event Commerce decides it is 

necessary to limit individual 

examination of respondents and 

conduct respondent selection under 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act, the 

following guidelines regarding 

collapsing of companies for purposes of 

respondent selection will apply. In 

general, Commerce has found that 

determinations concerning whether 

particular companies should be 

‘‘collapsed’’ (e.g., treated as a single 

entity for purposes of calculating 

antidumping duty rates) require a 

substantial amount of detailed 

information and analysis, which often 

require follow-up questions and 

analysis. Accordingly, Commerce will 

not conduct collapsing analyses at the 

respondent selection phase of this 

review and will not collapse companies 

at the respondent selection phase unless 

there has been a determination to 

collapse certain companies in a 

previous segment of this AD proceeding 

(e.g., investigation, administrative 

review, new shipper review, or changed 

circumstances review). For any 

company subject to this review, if 

Commerce determined, or continued to 

treat, that company as collapsed with 

others, Commerce will assume that such 

companies continue to operate in the 

same manner and will collapse them for 

respondent selection purposes. 

Otherwise, Commerce will not collapse 

companies for purposes of respondent 

selection. Parties are requested to (a) 

identify which companies subject to 

review previously were collapsed, and 

(b) provide a citation to the proceeding 

in which they were collapsed. Further, 

if companies are requested to complete 

the Quantity and Value (Q&V) 

Questionnaire for purposes of 

respondent selection, in general, each 

company must report volume and value 

data separately for itself. Parties should 

not include data for any other party, 

even if they believe they should be 

treated as a single entity with that other 

party. If a company was collapsed with 

another company or companies in the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding where Commerce 

considered collapsing that entity, 

complete Q&V data for that collapsed 

entity must be submitted. 

Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for 

Administrative Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a 

party that has requested a review may 

withdraw that request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review. The 

regulation provides that Commerce may 

extend this time if it is reasonable to do 

so. Determinations by Commerce to 

extend the 90-day deadline will be 

made on a case-by-case basis. 

Deadline for Particular Market 

Situation Allegation 

Section 504 of the Trade Preferences 

Extension Act of 2015 amended the Act 

by adding the concept of a particular 

market situation (PMS) for purposes of 

constructed value under section 773(e) 

of the Act.2 Section 773(e) of the Act 

states that ‘‘if a particular market 

situation exists such that the cost of 

materials and fabrication or other 

processing of any kind does not 

accurately reflect the cost of production 

in the ordinary course of trade, the 

administering authority may use 

another calculation methodology under 

this subtitle or any other calculation 

methodology.’’ When an interested 

party submits a PMS allegation pursuant 

to section 773(e) of the Act, Commerce 

will respond to such a submission 

consistent with 19 CFR 351.301(c)(2)(v). 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES