alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §80301. International agreements

(a) General Authority.—The President may make agreements with interested maritime countries to—

(1) maintain in the North Atlantic Ocean a service of ice patrol, of study and observation of ice and current conditions, and of assistance to vessels and their crews requiring assistance within the limits of the patrol;

(2) maintain a service of study and observation of ice and current conditions in the waters affecting the set and drift of ice in the North Atlantic Ocean; and

(3) take all practicable steps to ensure the destruction or removal of derelicts in the northern part of the Atlantic Ocean, east of the line drawn from Cape Sable to a point in latitude 34 degrees north, longitude 70 degrees west, if the destruction or removal is necessary.

(b) Payment Between Countries.—The President may include in an agreement under subsection (a) a provision for—

(1) payment to the United States Government by other countries for their proportionate share of the expense of maintaining the services; or

(2) contribution by the Government for its proportionate share if the agreement provides for another country to maintain the services.

(c) Payments.—Payments received pursuant to subsection (b)(1) shall be credited to the appropriation for operations and support of the Coast Guard.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §11, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1692; Pub. L. 113–281, title III, §314(a)(1), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 3049; Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8513(b), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4761.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 80301 | 46 App.:738. | June 25, 1936, ch. 807, §1, 49 Stat. 1922. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "operations and support" for "operating expenses".

2014—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 113–281 added subsec. (c).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2014 Amendment

Pub. L. 113–281, title III, §314(c), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 3049, provided that: "This section [enacting section 80304 of this title and amending this section and section 80302 of this title] shall take effect on January 1, 2017."
#### § 574.450 Financial records.

The grantee shall agree, and shall ensure that each project sponsor agrees, to maintain and make available to HUD for inspection financial records sufficient, in HUD's determination, to ensure proper accounting and disbursing of amounts received from a grant under this part.
### §40504. Shipping exchange registry

(a) In General.—No person may operate a shipping exchange involving ocean transportation in the foreign commerce of the United States unless the shipping exchange is registered as a national shipping exchange under the terms and conditions provided in this section and the regulations issued pursuant to this section.

(b) Registration.—A person shall register a shipping exchange by filing with the Federal Maritime Commission an application for registration in such form as the Commission, by rule, may prescribe, containing the rules of the exchange and such other information and documents as the Commission, by rule, may prescribe as necessary or appropriate to complete a shipping exchange's registration.

(c) Exemption.—The Commission may exempt, conditionally or unconditionally, a shipping exchange from registration under this section if the Commission finds that the shipping exchange is subject to comparable, comprehensive supervision and regulation by the appropriate governmental authorities in a foreign country where the shipping exchange is headquartered.

(d) Regulations.—Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022, the Commission shall issue regulations pursuant to subsection (a), which shall set standards necessary to carry out subtitle IV of this title for registered national shipping exchanges. For consideration of a service contract entered into by a shipping exchange, the Commission shall be limited to the minimum essential terms for service contracts established under section 40502 of this title.

(e) Definition of Shipping Exchange.—In this section, the term "shipping exchange" means a platform (digital, over-the-counter, or otherwise) that connects shippers with common carriers for the purpose of entering into underlying agreements or contracts for the transport of cargo, by vessel or other modes of transportation.

(Added Pub. L. 117–146, §4(a), June 16, 2022, 136 Stat. 1272.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of enactment of the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022, referred to in subsec. (d), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 117–146, which was approved June 16, 2022.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Applicability of Registration Requirement

Pub. L. 117–146, §4(b), June 16, 2022, 136 Stat. 1273, provided that: "The registration requirement under section 40504 of title 46, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)), shall take effect on the date on which the Federal Maritime Commission states the rule is effective in the regulations issued under such section."
### §14512. Standard tonnage measurement

(a) The Secretary shall prescribe regulations for measuring the gross and net tonnages of a vessel under this subchapter. The regulations shall provide for tonnages comparable to the tonnages that could have been assigned under sections 4151 and 4153 of the Revised Statutes of the United States, as sections 4151 and 4153 existed immediately before the enactment of this section.

(b) On application of the owner or master of a vessel of the United States used in foreign trade, the Secretary may attach an appendix to the vessel's register stating the measurement of spaces that may be deducted from gross tonnage under laws and regulations of other countries but not under those of the United States.

(Pub. L. 99–509, title V, §5101(3), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1924.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### Revised section 14512

Source: Section (U.S. Code) 46 App. U.S.C. 75, 77.

Section 14512(a) requires the Secretary to prescribe regulations for regulatory measurement systems. It further provides that the regulations must allow for the determination of tonnages similar to those that could have been found under the existing law (46 App. U.S.C. 75 & 77).

Section 14512(b) authorizes the Secretary to attach an appendix to a vessel's register stating the measurement of spaces that may be deducted from the gross tonnage under laws and regulations of other countries but not under the laws of the United States.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 4151 and 4153 of the Revised Statutes, referred to in subsec. (a), were classified to sections 75 and 77, respectively, of the former Appendix to this title and were repealed by Pub. L. 99–509, title V, §5104(b), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1928.
### §357. Free transportation

It shall not be unlawful for carriers to furnish free transportation to employees qualified for benefits or serving waiting periods under this chapter.

(June 25, 1938, ch. 680, §7, 52 Stat. 1102.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act June 25, 1938, ch. 680, 52 Stat. 1094, which enacted this chapter and amended sections 503 and 1104 and former section 1107 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 367 of this title and Tables.
### §1010. Reports

#### (a) Reports by Attorney General

#### (1) In general

On or before November 30, 1995, and on or before November 30 of each year thereafter, the Attorney General shall submit to Congress and make available to the public a report on the amounts paid during the preceding fiscal year to telecommunications carriers under sections 1003(e) and 1008 of this title.

#### (2) Contents

A report under paragraph (1) shall include—

(A) a detailed accounting of the amounts paid to each carrier and the equipment, facility, or service for which the amounts were paid; and

(B) projections of the amounts expected to be paid in the current fiscal year, the carriers to which payment is expected to be made, and the equipment, facilities, or services for which payment is expected to be made.

#### (b) Reports by Comptroller General and Inspector General

(1) On or before April 1, 1996, the Comptroller General of the United States, and every two years thereafter, the Inspector General of the Department of Justice, shall submit to the Congress a report, after consultation with the Attorney General and the telecommunications industry—

(A) describing the type of equipment, facilities, and services that have been brought into compliance under this subchapter; and

(B) reflecting its analysis of the reasonableness and cost-effectiveness of the payments made by the Attorney General to telecommunications carriers for modifications necessary to ensure compliance with this subchapter.

(2) Compliance cost estimates.—A report under paragraph (1) shall include findings and conclusions on the costs to be incurred by telecommunications carriers to comply with the assistance capability requirements of section 1002 of this title after the effective date of such section 1002 of this title, including projections of the amounts expected to be incurred and a description of the equipment, facilities, or services for which they are expected to be incurred.

(Pub. L. 103–414, title I, §112, Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4288; Pub. L. 104–316, title I, §126(b), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3840.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The effective date of section 1002 of this title, referred to in subsec. (b)(2), is the date that is 4 years after Oct. 25, 1994, see section 111(b) of Pub. L. 103–414, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1001 of this title.

#### Amendments

1996—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 104–316, §126(b)(1), inserted introductory provisions and struck out heading and text of former introductory provisions. Text read as follows: "On or before April 1, 1996, and every 2 years thereafter, the Comptroller General of the United States, after consultation with the Attorney General and the telecommunications industry, shall submit to the Congress a report—".

Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 104–316, §126(b)(2), substituted "findings and conclusions" for "the findings and conclusions of the Comptroller General".
| 1 |

© 2016 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. 

For Official Use Only

Draft – Work in Progress

EWR Average Daily Delay

Airport

Scenario

Arrival	

Count

Delay	(Minutes) Number	of	Flights	Delayed

Schedule Capacity Total Mean Mean	

Positive >0 >15 60+ 120+ [60,120)

EWR

(Arrivals)

Negotiated	Summer	

2008 2007 672 16,100 24.0 26.9 572 233 94.1 24.0 70.1

Summer	2015

January	2013	-

February	2015	(minus	

construction	months)

616 10,100 16.3 18.6 507 133 41.1 17.8 23.3

Difference -8% -37% -32% -31% -11% -43% -56% -26% -67%

Airport

Scenario

Departure	

Count

Delay	(Minutes) Number	of	Flights	Delayed

Schedule Capacity Total Mean Mean	

Positive >0 >15 60+ 120+ [60,120)

EWR

(Departures)

Negotiated	Summer	

2008 2007 669 12,000 18.0 19.1 618 257 15.7 4.39 11.3

Summer	2015

January	2013	-

February	2015	(minus	

construction	months)

622 8,900 14.2 15.3 562 177 13.5 7.80 5.70

Difference -7% -26% -21% -20% -9% -31% -14% 78% -50%
| 2 |

© 2016 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. 

For Official Use Only

Draft – Work in Progress

EWR Average Hourly Arrival Delay

Airport

Scenario

Arrival	

Count

Delay	(Minutes) Number	of	Flights	Delayed

Schedule Capacity Total Mean Mean	

Positive >0 >15 60+ 120+ [60,120)

EWR

(Arrivals)

Negotiated	Summer	

2008 2007 672 16,100 24.0 26.9 572 233 94.1 24.0 70.1

Summer	2015

January	2013	-

February	2015	(minus	

construction	months)

616 10,100 16.3 18.6 507 133 41.1 17.8 23.3

Difference -8% -37% -32% -31% -11% -43% -56% -26% -67%
| 3 |

© 2016 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. 

For Official Use Only

Draft – Work in Progress

EWR Average Hourly Departure Delay

Airport

Scenario

Departure	

Count

Delay	(Minutes) Number	of	Flights	Delayed

Schedule Capacity Total Mean Mean	

Positive >0 >15 60+ 120+ [60,120)

EWR

(Departures)

Negotiated	Summer	

2008 2007 669 12,000 18.0 19.1 618 257 15.7 4.39 11.3

Summer	2015

January	2013	-

February	2015	(minus	

construction	months)

622 8,900 14.2 15.3 562 177 13.5 7.80 5.70

Difference -7% -26% -21% -20% -9% -31% -14% 78% -50%
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

 

I, James A. Konrath, Chief Executive Officer of Accredited Mortgage LoanREIT Trust (the “Registrant”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge: 

 

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, towhich this certification is attached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and 

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

 

Date: March 15, 2006 

 

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust and will be retained by Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.
#### John L. Hobbs, Plaintiff, v Eugene L. Scorse et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. Ed Frederico, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent; Di Marco Constructors Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

Motion for reargument, or, in the alternative, for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied. Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Dillon, Hancock, Jr. and Denman, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 982
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999, and at 89 FR 38293, May 7, 2024.

§ 982.456 Third parties. ( a ) Even if the family continues to occupy the unit, the PHA may exercise any rights and remedies against the owner under the HAP contract.
( b ) ( 1 ) The family is not a party to or third party beneficiary of the HAP contract. Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the family may not exercise any right or remedy against the owner under the HAP contract.
( 2 ) The tenant may exercise any right or remedy against the owner under the lease between the tenant and the owner, including enforcement of the owner's obligations under the tenancy addendum (which is included both in the HAP contract between the PHA and the owner; and in the lease between the tenant and the owner.)
( c ) The HAP contract shall not be construed as creating any right of the family or other third party (other than HUD) to enforce any provision of the HAP contract, or to assert any claim against HUD, the PHA or the owner under the HAP contract.
[60 FR 34695, July 3, 1995, as amended at 64 FR 26647, May 14, 1999]
### §390h–38. Yucaipa Valley regional water supply renewal project

#### (a) Authorization

The Secretary, in cooperation with the Yucaipa Valley Water District, may participate in the design, planning, and construction of projects to treat impaired surface water, reclaim and reuse impaired groundwater, and provide brine disposal within the Santa Ana Watershed as described in the report submitted under section 390h–4 of this title.

#### (b) Cost sharing

The Federal share of the cost of the project described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 25 percent of the total cost of the project.

#### (c) Limitation

Funds provided by the Secretary shall not be used for operation or maintenance of the project described in subsection (a).

#### (d) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $20,000,000.

(Pub. L. 102–575, title XVI, §1655, as added Pub. L. 111–11, title IX, §9114(a), Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1320.)
### §60105. Clearance of vessels

(a) Vessels of the United States.—Except as otherwise provided by law, a vessel of the United States shall obtain clearance from the Secretary of Homeland Security before proceeding from a port or place in the United States—

(1) for a foreign port or place;

(2) for another port or place in the United States if the vessel has on board foreign merchandise for which entry has not been made; or

(3) outside the territorial sea to visit a hovering vessel or to receive merchandise while outside the territorial sea.

(b) Other Vessels.—Except as otherwise provided by law, a vessel that is not a vessel of the United States shall obtain clearance from the Secretary before proceeding from a port or place in the United States—

(1) for a foreign port or place;

(2) for another port or place in the United States; or

(3) outside the territorial sea to visit a hovering vessel or to receive or deliver merchandise while outside the territorial sea.

(c) Regulations.—The Secretary may by regulation—

(1) prescribe the manner in which clearance under this section is to be obtained, including the documents, data, or information which shall be submitted or transmitted, pursuant to an authorized data interchange system, to obtain the clearance;

(2) permit clearance to be obtained before all requirements for clearance are complied with, but only if the owner or operator of the vessel files a bond in an amount set by the Secretary conditioned on the compliance by the owner or operator with all specified requirements for clearance within a time period (not exceeding 4 business days) established by the Secretary; and

(3) permit clearance to be obtained at a place other than a designated port of entry, under conditions the Secretary may prescribe.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §9(b), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1675.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 60105 | 46 App.:91. | R.S. §4197; Aug. 5, 1935, ch. 438, title II, §209, 49 Stat. 526; June 16, 1938, ch. 476, §1, 52 Stat. 758; Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1213, title V, §501(a), 68 Stat. 1140; Pub. L. 103–182, title VI, §686(b), Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2221; Pub. L. 106–476, title I, §1452(a)(3), Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2167. |

Section

The Secretary of Homeland Security is substituted for the Customs Service and for the Secretary of the Treasury because the functions of the Customs Service and of the Secretary of the Treasury relating thereto were transferred to the Secretary of Homeland Security by section 403(1) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107–296, 116 Stat. 2178).
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7124** 

SHERWOOD A. ADAMS , Petitioner

– Appellant ,

v.
GREGORY KNOWLIN , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States Dis trict Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. Cameron McGowan Currie , District Judge. ( 2:10

- cv - 02195

- CMC )

Submitted : February 9 , 2012 Decided: February 13, 2012

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Sherwood A. Adams, Appellant Pro Se. Melody Jane Brown, Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding prec edent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Sherwood A. Adams seeks to appeal the district court’s
order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition . We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
Parties a re accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fe d. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
The district court’s order was entered on the docket

on July 13, 2011 . The notice of appeal was filed on August 17,
2011

. * Because Adams failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appea l period, we dismiss the appeal and deny Adams’s motion for sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the fac ts and legal

* F or the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988).3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 35.505 Definitions and other general requirements.

Definitions and other general requirements that apply to this subpart are found in subpart B of this part.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-78,752-04

EX P ARTE TIMOTH Y QUINTEN BALDWIN, Appl icant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 120021BR IN THE 260 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM ORANG E COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant was convicted of ag g rava ted sexu al as s au l t and sentenc ed to fifty y ear s’ imprisonment. The Ninth Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. Baldwin v. State , No. 09-13- 00071-CR (Tex. App.—B eaumont J an. 15, 2014)(not desig nated for publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends that trial counsel was ineffe ctive beca use he failed to p r o p e rly investiga te and consult with him prior to trial, he failed to consult with a medical expert, he preve nted Applicant from testify ing in his own defe nse, and he failed to object to a detec tive testify ing reg arding a nurse’ s sexual assault examination repor t. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might en t i t l e h i m to2

r e lief. Strickland v. W

ashington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Acc ording ly , the rec ord shou ld b e d e v e lo p e d

. The trial c ourt is the appropriate forum for findings of fac t. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3 (d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. I n d ev el o p i n g t h e

rec ord, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). I f the trial court elec ts to hold a hear ing, it shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wants to be represe nt ed by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to repr esent him at t he hearing

. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. I f counsel is appointed or reta ined, the trial court shall immediately

notify this Court of counsel’s name

. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s p er fo rm an ce was defic ient and Applicant was prejudice d. The trial court may make any ot h er finding s and conc lusions that it deems a ppropriate in response to Applica nt’s claims. The trial court shall make findings of fac t and conclusions o f law withi n ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motio n s, objections, proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: September

16, 2020 Do not publish