alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 323 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 323

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To redesignate the Ellis Island Library on the third floor of the Ellis 
Island Immigration Museum, located on Ellis Island in New York Harbor, 
                 as the ``Bob Hope Memorial Library''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The Ellis Island Library on the third floor of the Ellis Island 
Immigration Museum, located on Ellis Island in New York Harbor, shall 
be known and redesignated as the ``Bob Hope Memorial Library''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Ellis Island Library on the third 
floor of the Ellis Island Immigration Museum referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Bob Hope Memorial Library''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 15, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 323

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To redesignate the Ellis Island Library on the third floor of the Ellis 
Island Immigration Museum, located on Ellis Island in New York Harbor, 
                 as the ``Bob Hope Memorial Library''.
```
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 19, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134481 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan In re: Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, The Honorable Norene S. Redmond Judge, 38 th District Court Eastpointe, Michigan SC: 134481 Justices

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the Judicial Tenure Commission has issued a Decision and Recommendation for Discipline, and the Honorab le Norene S. Redmond has consented to the Commission’s findings of fact. We note that some of the conclusions of the Judicial Tenure Commission appear to in volve matters reflecting lega l error on the part of the respondent. We DIRECT the Judicial Tenure Commission to file a written explanation, within 28 days after the date of this order, citing any authority it believes it has for treating as unethical conduct matters of lega l error that could have been subject to appellate review.

We retain jurisdiction.

t1016 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 19, 2007

Clerk
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Firearms Training Systems,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John A. Morelli, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                             /s/ JOHN A MORELLI
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             John A. Morelli
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             February 13, 2003
**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Serge Atlan, certify that: 

  1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of FalconTarget, Inc.;  

  2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  

  3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  

  4) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  

  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  

  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon such evaluation; and  

  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and  

  5) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  

  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information and  

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.  

Date: September 8, 2005 

By:   /s/   Serge Atlan 

    Serge Atlan

    Chairman
### Part B—Federal Communications Commission Licensing Criteria: Privatization Criteria
#### § 91.600 Waiver authority.

Upon determination of good cause, HUD may, subject to statutory limitations, waive any provision of this part. Each such waiver must be in writing and must be supported by documentation of the pertinent facts and grounds.

[60 FR 50802, Sept. 29, 1995]
#### §§ 882.103-882.122 [Reserved]
Exhibit 21.1

List of Significant Subsidiaries (as defined in Regulation S-X, Rule 1-02) of JER Investors Trust Inc.

Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries:



| |  |  | JER Investors Trust Finance Company I LLC (DE)
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------



| |  |  | JER Investors Trust Finance Company II LLC (DE)
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------



| |  |  | JER TRS Holding Company Inc. (DE)
| | - |  | ---------------------------------



| |  |  | JER CRE CDO 2005-1 Depositor, LLC (DE)
| | - |  | --------------------------------------



| |  |  | JER CRE CDO 2005-1, Limited (Cayman Islands)
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------



| |  |  | JER CRE CDO 2005-1, LLC (DE)
| | - |  | ----------------------------



| |  |  | JER CRE CDO 2006-2, LLC (DE)
| | - |  | ----------------------------



| |  |  | JER CRE CDO 2006-2 Depositor, LLC (DE)
| | - |  | --------------------------------------



| |  |  | JER CRE CDO 2006-2, Limited (Cayman Islands)
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------



| |  |  | JER Investors Trust Finance Company GS, LLC (DE)
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | JERIT LF CMBS Finance LLC (DE)
| | - |  | ------------------------------



| |  |  | JERIT Acquisition Co. 1 LLC (DE)
| | - |  | --------------------------------



| |  |  | JERIT Acquisition Co. 2 LLC (DE)
| | - |  | --------------------------------



| |  |  | JER Hudson Community Capital, LLC (DE)
| | - |  | --------------------------------------



| |  |  | JERIT Finance Co JPM, LLC (DE)
| | - |  | ------------------------------



| |  |  | JERIT CS Fund I Member, LLC (DE)
| | - |  | --------------------------------



| |  |  | JERIT Non-CDO Assets Holding LLC (DE)
| | - |  | -------------------------------------



| |  |  | JERIT Non-CDO Mezzanine 1 LLC (DE)
| | - |  | ----------------------------------



| |  |  | JERIT Non-CDO Mezzanine 2 LLC (DE)
| | - |  | ----------------------------------



| |  |  | JERIT Non-CDO CMBS 1 LLC (DE)
| | - |  | -----------------------------



| |  |  | JERIT Non-CDO CMBS 2 LLC (DE)
| | - |  | -----------------------------

50% Member



| |  |  | JERIT CS Fund I, LLC (DE)
| | - |  | -------------------------

Trusts



| |  |  | JER Investors Trust Inc. REIT Qualification Trust
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | JERIT TS Statutory Trust I (DE)
| | - |  | -------------------------------

| |  |  | JERIT TS Administration, LLC (DE)
| | - |  | ---------------------------------

US Debt
Fund



| |  |  | JER US Debt Co-Investment Vehicle, L.P.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 12-3941

_____________

KEMPIS P. SONGSTER

v.

SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;

DAVID DIGUGLIELMO; THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA; 

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Appellants 

On Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(No. 2-04-cv-05916)

District Judge: Hon. Timothy J. Savage

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

March 8, 2016

Before: CHAGARES, VANASKIE, and SHWARTZ, Circuit Judges.

__________________

JUDGMENT ORDER

___________________

This cause came to be considered on the record from the United States District 

Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and was submitted pursuant to Third 

Circuit LAR 34.1(a) on March 8, 2016. 

While on appeal, the United States Supreme Court decided Montgomery v. 

Louisiana, 577 U.S. ___ (2016). Appellee now seeks remand and represents to the Court 
that Appellants are in agreement that remand is appropriate. We hold that the District 

Court should have the opportunity to consider the implications of Montgomery in the first 

instance. For that reason, it is now hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED by this Court 

that the District Court's order dated September 6, 2012 is VACATED and REMANDED

for proceedings not inconsistent with Montgomery. 

BY THE COURT:

s/ Michael A. Chagares

Circuit Judge

ATTEST:

s/Marcia M. Waldron

Clerk

Dated: March 15, 2016
Editorial Note on Part 982
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999, and at 89 FR 38293, May 7, 2024.

§ 982.451 Housing assistance payments contract. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 38300 , May 7, 2024.
( a ) *Form and term.* ( 1 ) The HAP contract must be in the form required by HUD.
( 2 ) The term of the HAP contract is the same as the term of the lease.
( b ) *Housing assistance payment amount.* ( 1 ) The amount of the monthly housing assistance payment by the PHA to the owner is determined by the PHA in accordance with HUD regulations and other requirements. The amount of the housing assistance payment is subject to change during the HAP contract term.
( 2 ) The monthly housing assistance payment by the PHA is credited toward the monthly rent to owner under the family's lease.
( 3 ) The total of rent paid by the tenant plus the PHA housing assistance payment to the owner may not be more than the rent to owner. The owner must immediately return any excess payment to the PHA.
( 4 ) ( i ) The part of the rent to owner that is paid by the tenant may not be more than: ( A ) The rent to owner; minus
( B ) The PHA housing assistance payment to the owner.
( ii ) The owner may not demand or accept any rent payment from the tenant in excess of this maximum, and must immediately return any excess rent payment to the tenant.
( iii ) The family is not responsible for payment of the portion of rent to owner covered by the housing assistance payment under the HAP contract between the owner and the PHA. See § 982.310(b).
( 5 ) ( i ) The PHA must pay the housing assistance payment promptly when due to the owner in accordance with the HAP contract.
( ii ) ( A ) The HAP contract shall provide for penalties against the PHA for late payment of housing assistance payments due to the owner if all the following circumstances apply: ( 1 ) Such penalties are in accordance with generally accepted practices and law, as applicable in the local housing market, governing penalties for late payment of rent by a tenant;
( 2 ) It is the owner's practice to charge such penalties for assisted and unassisted tenants; and
( 3 ) The owner also charges such penalties against the tenant for late payment of family rent to owner.
( B ) The PHA is not obligated to pay any late payment penalty if HUD determines that late payment by the PHA is due to factors beyond the PHA's control. The PHA may add HAP contract provisions which define when the housing assistance payment by the PHA is deemed received by the owner (*e.g.,* upon mailing by the PHA or actual receipt by the owner).
( iii ) The PHA may only use the following sources to pay a late payment penalty from program receipts under the consolidated ACC: administrative fee income for the program, or the administrative fee reserve for the program. The PHA may not use other program receipts for this purpose.
[60 FR 34695, July 3, 1995, as amended at 61 FR 27163, May 30, 1996; 63 FR 23861, Apr. 30, 1998; 64 FR 26647, May 14, 1999; 64 FR 56914, Oct. 21, 1999; 89 FR 38300, May 7, 2024]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Richard Coleman, Appellant.

Motion by appellant to dispense with printing granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers and on appellant’s typewritten brief. The appellant is directed to file six copies of his typewritten brief and to serve one copy on the District Attorney. The appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to the February Term, commencing January 30, 1961; the appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. Motion for assignment of counsel denied. The appeal is from an order denying without a hearing appellant’s *coram nobis*application. It appears from the motion papers that appellant either has in his possession a copy of the original papers to be used in the consideration of this appeal, or has full knowledge of their contents. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Mark Lana, President, Chief Executive Officer and director of HS3 Technologies, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of HS3 Technologies, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HS3 Technologies, Inc. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| Dated: October 18, 2006 |   |          |
|-------------------------|--------|---------------|
|                    |   |          |
|                    |   |          |
|                    |   | /s/ Mark Lana |   |  
 

 

Mark Lana

 

 

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

 

 

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

 

 

HS3 Technologies, Inc.

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to HS3 Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by HS3 Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

 

 

 

  |
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 99.4



                   TURBODYNE REPORTS SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT
                          IN FAVOR OF GRAND TECH, INC.


CARPINTERIA, CA - JANUARY 21, 2000 - Turbodyne Technologies Inc. (EASDAQ:TRBD)
announced today that it has paid the judgment entered in favor of Grand Tech,
Inc. (formerly: Grand Technologies, Inc.) in connection with the arbitration
proceeding instituted by Grand Tech, Inc. against Turbodyne Technologies Inc.,
Turbodyne Systems Inc. and Director Edward Halimi. The satisfaction of the
judgment results in a release of Grand Tech, Inc.'s liens against Turbodyne.

Gerhard E. Delf, Turbodyne's Chief Executive Officer, stated: "The satisfaction
of the Grand Tech, Inc. judgment and arbitration award removes significant legal
obstacles that previously faced Turbodyne, and allows the Turbodyne companies to
enter the new year free and clear of the liens and ongoing legal burdens that
arose as a result of the Grand Tech, Inc. arbitration."

Turbodyne Technologies Inc., a California based high technology company,
specializes in the development, manufacture and marketing of performance
enhancement, fuel economy and pollution control products for internal combustion
engines in the global automotive, transportation, construction, marine, mining
and military industries.

Turbodyne Technologies Inc.'s headquarters is located in Carpinteria, CA; the
European business location is Frankfurt, Germany.

Turbodyne's World  Wide  Web address is: www.turbodyne.com

Contacts:

Corporate Communications, Peter Weichselbraun (800) 566-1130
VP Group Finance - Investor Relations, Ken Fitzpatrick (800) 566-1130
European Business Development, Markus Kumbrink +49-69-975-44-665
### **CHAPTER 603—TONNAGE TAXES AND LIGHT MONEY**

Sec.
60301.
Regular tonnage taxes.
60302.
Special tonnage taxes.
60303.
Light money.
60304.
Presidential suspension of tonnage taxes and light money.
60305.
Vessels in distress.
60306.
Vessels not engaged in trade.
60307.
Vessels engaged in coastwise trade or the fisheries.
60308.
Vessels engaged in Great Lakes trade.
60309.
Passenger vessels making trips between ports of the United States and foreign ports.
60310.
Vessels making daily trips on interior waters.
60311.
Hospital vessels in time of war.
60312.
Rights under treaties preserved.
### §390h–8. Lake Cheraw water reclamation and reuse study

#### (a) General authority

The Secretary is authorized, in cooperation with the State of Colorado and appropriate local and regional entities, to conduct a study to assess and develop means of reclaiming the waters of Lake Cheraw, Colorado, or otherwise ameliorating, controlling and mitigating potential negative impacts of pollution in the waters of Lake Cheraw on groundwater resources or the waters of the Arkansas River.

#### (b) Federal share

The Federal share of the costs of the study authorized by this section shall not exceed 50 per centum of the total.

#### (c) Report

The Secretary shall submit the report authorized by this section to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives not later than two years after appropriation of funds authorized by sections 390h to 390h–39 of this title.

(Pub. L. 102–575, title XVI, §1610, Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4667; Pub. L. 103–437, §16(a)(2), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4594.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 103–437 substituted "Natural Resources" for "Interior and Insular Affairs" before "of the House".
### §917. Applicability of National Environmental Policy Act

The provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act [42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.] shall not apply to transactions carried out pursuant to this chapter.

(Pub. L. 96–101, §19, Nov. 4, 1979, 93 Stat. 746.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The National Environmental Policy Act, referred to in text, probably means the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Pub. L. 91–190, Jan. 1, 1970, 83 Stat. 852, which is classified generally to chapter 55 (§4321 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4321 of Title 42 and Tables.