alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FATS, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,298
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,045
<ALLOWANCES>                                       210
<INVENTORY>                                     17,551
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,639
<PP&E>                                           8,649
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,620
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,158
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,603
<BONDS>                                         64,896
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,154
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       114,350
<OTHER-SE>                                    (144,011)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,158
<SALES>                                         15,196
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,196
<CGS>                                            9,745
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,745
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,627
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,783
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (202)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (69)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (133)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (195)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.01)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1238

In re: MICHAEL T. VERBURG,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:07-cr-00045-MBS-1)

Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: May 31, 2011

Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael T. Verburg, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael T. Verburg petitions for a writ of mandamus 

seeking an order compelling the district court to dismiss the 

indictment underlying his 2009 criminal conviction for fraud, in 

violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 1342 (2006). We conclude 

that Verburg is not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used 

only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States 

Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United Sates v. 

Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, 

mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a 

clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan 

Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Mandamus may not be 

used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp., 

503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007).

The relief sought by Verburg is not available by way 

of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We 

deny Verburg’s pending motions, including his motion to compel, 

motion for transcript, motion for counsel, motion to expedite, 

and motion for release pending appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
3

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
### §422k. Supplement to Federal reclamation laws; short title

This subchapter shall be a supplement to the Federal reclamation laws and may be cited as the Small Reclamation Projects Act of 1956.

(Aug. 6, 1956, ch. 972, §11, 70 Stat. 1047.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal reclamation laws, referred to in text, are defined in section 422b of this title.
### §375. Sale of land improved at expense of reclamation fund

Whenever in the opinion of the Secretary of the Interior any public lands which have been withdrawn for or in connection with construction or operation of reclamation projects under the provisions of the Act of June 17, 1902, known as the Reclamation Act 1 and Acts amendatory thereof and supplementary thereto, which are not otherwise reserved and which have been improved by and at the expense of the reclamation fund for administration or other like purposes, are no longer needed for the purposes for which they were withdrawn and improved, the Secretary of the Interior may cause said lands, together with the improvements thereon, to be appraised by three disinterested persons to be appointed by him, and thereafter sell the same, for not less than the appraised value, at public auction to the highest bidder, after giving public notice of the time and place of sale by posting upon the land and by publication for not less than thirty days in a newspaper of general circulation in the vicinity of the land; not less than one-fifth the purchase price shall be paid at the time of sale, and the remainder in not more than four annual payments with interest at 6 per centum per annum, payable annually, on deferred payments.

Upon payment of the purchase price the Secretary of the Interior is authorized, by appropriate patent, to convey all the right, title, and interest of the United States in and to said lands to the purchaser at said sale, subject, however, to such reservations, limitations, or conditions as said Secretary may deem proper: Provided, That not over one hundred and sixty acres shall be sold to any one person, and if said lands are irrigable under the project in which located they shall be sold subject to compliance by the purchaser with all the terms, conditions, and limitations of the reclamation law applicable to lands of that character: Provided, That the accepted bidder must, prior to issuance of patent, furnish satisfactory evidence that he or she is a citizen of the United States.

The moneys derived from the sale of such lands shall be covered into the reclamation fund and be placed to the credit of the project for which such lands had been withdrawn.

(May 20, 1920, ch. 192, §§1–3, 41 Stat. 605, 606.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of June 17, 1902, referred to in text, is act June 17, 1902, ch. 1093, 32 Stat. 388, popularly known as the Reclamation Act, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 371 of this title and Tables.

1 So in original. Probably should be followed by a comma.
### §10907. Permission to make complaint

(a) A master may not refuse to permit, deny the opportunity to, or hinder a seaman who wishes to make a complaint authorized by this chapter.

(b) A master violating this section is liable to the United States Government for civil penalty of $500.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 577.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 10907 | 46:65346:664 |

46:664

Section 10907 prohibits a master from hindering a seaman from making a complaint authorized by this chapter and subjects the master to a fine for violation of this section.
#### STEINHARDT et al. v. EISEN et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

June 22, 1903.)

1. Pleadings—Amendment—Defense, of Usury.

Municipal court act (Laws 1902, p. 1542, c. 580, § 166), providing that the court must on application allow a pleading to be amended at any time if substantial justice will be promoted thereby, requires the municipal court to allow an amendment to defendants’ answer by setting up the defense of usury.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Third District.

Action by Louis H. Steinhardt and another against David Eisen and others. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal. Reversed.

. Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J„ and GILDERSLEEVE and MacLEAN, JJ.

Steuer, Hoffman & Wahle, for appellants.

H. J. Hindes, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

At the close of the plaintiffs’ case, and again at the close of the whole case, the defendants asked leave to amend the *233answer by setting up the defense of usury. This was denied by the trial court. Municipal Court Act, § 166 (Laws 1902, p. 1542, c. 580), provides “that the court must, upon application, allow a pleading to be amended at any time, if substantial justice will be promoted thereby.” This proposed amendment should have been granted, upon such terms, however, as the court might deem proper. The defense sought to be interposed has sometimes been termed an unconscionable one, and not to be encouraged, but it is a legal one nevertheless, and if proven no recovery can be had. The judgment must therefore be reversed.

Judgment reversed. New trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Computerized Thermal Imaging, Inc.,
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Richard V. Secord, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date:  November  17, 2003                        /s/ Richard V. Secord
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Richard V. Secord
                                                 Chairman of the Board and Chief
                                                 Executive Officer


                                       35
### §1704. Superintendent of Documents: pay of employees for night, Sunday, holiday, and overtime work

Employees in the office of the Superintendent of Documents may be paid for night, Sunday, holiday, and overtime work at rates not in excess of the rates of additional pay for this work allowed other employees of the Government Publishing Office under section 305 of this title.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1279; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(b), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §75 (Mar. 4, 1925, ch. 549, §1, 43 Stat. 1300; May 13, 1926, ch. 294, §1, 44 Stat. 552; Feb. 23, 1927, ch. 166, 44 Stat. 1160).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Government Publishing Office" substituted for "Government Printing Office" in text on authority of section 1301(b) of Pub. L. 113–235, set out as a note preceding section 301 of this title.
-917 00’ 00”

-90* 54’ 00”

-90* 48’ 00”

-90% 42° 00"

-90* 36° 00”

-90* 30’ 00”

-90% 24’ 00”

-90* 18’ 00"

~90* 12° 00”

-~90"06’ a0” -90%00' qe u

30’ a0”

SOS

a
aes |
28% 24’ 00"

224’ 00"

28° 18’ 00”

8°18’ 00"

287 12’ 00”

28% 12’ 00"

28% 06’ 00”

287 06’ 00”

-91%00' 00”

EWING BANK

7939

8 oS ee Nn

~90° 54’ a0”

79483

NO
Co Ste

SK

-90" 48’ 00”

;

-90% 42’ 00"

-90* 36’ 00”

_ oN

v 8 O, s
O% ] a ° x 695 “>
Ne) - ‘ 320 6
70° we —a %

-90* 30’ G0”

rT

-90* 24’ 00"

-90* 18’ 00”

-90* 12° G0"

-~90406' 00” -~90%00' a0”

EWING BANK SE N280090W
SCALE: 1:100,000

NOS MULTIBEAM SURVEY

Contours in corrected meters

LA

| \
\
|
|
|
fos
3s a)
(7) rez
a
8 1 6
F Gz
wee
| 7 faa
oi? m7
, 3f/F |
| 23> |
|
27——
2
288 “3b
=
ba eZ
8} 8
~ Zz
. ec
2 e=<
a i |
3) ° &
; ¢ .
1 §
|
]
\
1
{
ol
wv
z
2
a
Zz
E
; a
2 5
i=}
3
3
i
|
|
|
oO
5S
=
Fa
ao
Zz
Cc
<
ioe
m
a
#### § 972.233 Timing of submission of conversion plans to HUD.

A PHA that wishes to convert a public housing project to tenant-based assistance must submit a conversion plan to HUD. A PHA must prepare a conversion plan, in accordance with § 972.230, and submit it to HUD, as part of the next PHA Annual Plan within one year after submitting the full conversion assessment, or as a significant amendment to that Annual Plan. The PHA may also submit the conversion plan in the same Annual Plan as the conversion assessment.
§ 578.109 Closeout. ( a ) *In general.* Grants will be closed out in accordance with the requirements of 2 CFR part 200, subpart D, and closeout procedures established by HUD.
( b ) *Reports.* Applicants must submit all reports required by HUD no later than 90 days from the date of the end of the project's grant term.
( c ) *Closeout agreement.* Any obligations remaining as of the date of the closeout must be covered by the terms of a closeout agreement. The agreement will be prepared by HUD in consultation with the recipient. The agreement must identify the grant being closed out, and include provisions with respect to the following: ( 1 ) Identification of any closeout costs or contingent liabilities subject to payment with Continuum of Care program funds after the closeout agreement is signed;
( 2 ) Identification of any unused grant funds to be deobligated by HUD;
( 3 ) Identification of any program income on deposit in financial institutions at the time the closeout agreement is signed;
( 4 ) Description of the recipient's responsibility after closeout for: ( i ) Compliance with all program requirements in using program income on deposit at the time the closeout agreement is signed and in using any other remaining Continuum of Care program funds available for closeout costs and contingent liabilities;
( ii ) Use of real property assisted with Continuum of Care program funds in accordance with the terms of commitment and principles;
( iii ) Use of personal property purchased with Continuum of Care program funds; and
( iv ) Compliance with requirements governing program income received subsequent to grant closeout.
( 5 ) Other provisions appropriate to any special circumstances of the grant closeout, in modification of or in addition to the obligations in paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of this section.
[77 FR 45442, July 31, 2012, as amended at 80 FR 75940, Dec. 7, 2015]
Faulk, Scott (OST)

From: Sent: To:

Cc: Subject: Attachments:

Greetings Aq: Faulk, Scott (OST) Monday, March 23, 2015 10:05 AM 'atotemoff@tatitlek.com'; 'nkompkoff@tatitlek.com'; 'bcrumley@chugachschools.com'; 'olen@nprha.com'; 'dtotemoff@rocketmail.com'; 'grace.hoover@chugach.com'; 'thopper@chugach.com'; 'communications@chugach.com'; 'jjohnson@chugach.com'; 'communications@chugach.com'; 'Info@Chugachmiut.org' 'Rachel'; 'Michael Reeve, Reeve Air Alaska'; 'Jason Ward'; Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) Update on Essential Air Service at Tatitlek, AK Alaska Air Transit.pdf; Reeve Air Alaska.pdf; Security Aviation.pdf

I would like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at Tatitlek, as well as give you an opportunity to offer any commentsfor the formal record before we submit a recommendationto the Assistant Secretaryfor Aviation and International Affairs. As you mayknow, the Department issued Order2015-2-4, on February 9, 2015, requesting proposals from air carriers interested in providing EAS at Tatitlek for anewterm beginning October I, 2015. In response to the Department's request, Alaska AirTransit, Reeve Air Alaska, and Security Aviation submittedproposals for consideration.

Ihave attached those proposals to this email and expectthem to be uploaded on www.regulations.gov sometime this afternoon. Irequest that you reviewthe proposals and submit any commentsyou mayhave as soon as possible, but no laterthan April 24.2015. Please send your comments directly to me via e-mail at scott.faulk@dot.gov. Also, please forward this to all relevant parties that I have not included on the distribution list.

Ifyou have any questions, feel free to contact me. Regards, ScottFaulk U.S. Department ofTransportation EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 1200NewJersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-9967

1 . '



## .'-' ·.C 

# >
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       4,410,500
<SECURITIES>                                 4,594,800
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,971,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                   226,900
<INVENTORY>                                 15,075,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            44,523,500
<PP&E>                                       7,132,700
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,724,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              79,794,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,100,700
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        88,900
<OTHER-SE>                                  60,310,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                79,794,100
<SALES>                                     20,234,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,234,900
<CGS>                                       14,807,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,112,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               141,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (195,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             133,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                981,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                   382,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            598,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   598,700
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DALLAS EUROPEAN AUTO, L

. L

. C

. ,

Appellant

,

v.

HAMID MASSOUDI D/B/A SPORT

MOTOR CARS

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 12

- 00 336

- CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law #1

of Collin County, Texas

(TC# 001

- 01761

- 2011 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Dallas European Auto, LLC, and Appellee, Hamid Massoudi d/b/a Sport Motor

Cars, have jointly moved to dismiss this appeal. As permitted by the Rules of Appellate

Procedure, an appeal may be dismissed “[i]n accordance with a n agreement signed by the parties

or their attorneys

. . . . ” T EX .R.A PP .P. 42. 1(a)(2) . Because Appellant and Appellee have

complied with th e requirements of Rule 42. 1 , we grant the motion to dismiss and dismiss the

appeal. While the motion itself does not set out an arrangement regarding costs, the proposed

order attached to the m otion does. Construing this pleading liberally each party will be taxed

their own costs. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(d) (absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax

costs against t he appellant).

F ebruary 27, 2013

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
§ 245.417 Initial submission of materials to HUD: Conversion of residential units to a nonresidential use, or to cooperative housing or condominiums. In the case of a conversion of residential units to a nonresidential use, or to cooperative housing or condominiums, the mortgagor must submit the following materials to the local HUD office in accordance with §§ 245.415 and 245.419: ( a ) In the case of a proposed conversion of residential rental units to nonresidential use: ( 1 ) A statement describing the proposed conversion;
( 2 ) A statement describing the estimated effect of the proposed conversion on the value of the project, the project rent schedule, the number of dwelling units in the project, a list of the units to be converted and their occupancy, the amount of subsidy available to the project, and the project income and expenses (including property taxes);
( 3 ) A statement assessing the compatibility of the proposed nonresidential use with the residential character of the project;
( 4 ) Written approval of the mortgagee if required;
( 5 ) An undertaking by the mortgagor to pay all relocation costs that may be required by HUD for tenants required to vacate the project because of the conversion; and
( 6 ) A copy of the notice to tenants.
( b ) In the case of a proposed transfer of the project to a cooperative housing mortgagor corporation or association (conversion of residential rental units to residential cooperative housing), the materials specified in paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2) and (a)(3) of this section and the following additional materials: ( 1 ) An estimate of the demand for cooperative housing, including an estimate of the number of present tenants interested in purchasing cooperative housing;
( 2 ) Estimates of downpayments and monthly carrying charges that will be required; and
( 3 ) Copies of proposed organizational documents, including By-Laws, Articles of Incorporation, Subscription Agreement, Occupancy Agreement, and Sale Document.
( c ) In the case of a proposed conversion of residential rental units to condominium units, the materials specified in paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(4), and (a)(6) of this section and the following additional materials: ( 1 ) An estimate of the demand for condominium housing, including an estimate of the number of present tenants interested in purchasing units;
( 2 ) Estimates of downpayments, monthly mortgage payments and condominium association fees that will be required; and
( 3 ) A list of the units to be converted and their occupancy.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2502-0310)
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Firearms Training Systems, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended December 31, 2001 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, John A. Morelli, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

| |  |                                                                    
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ John A. Morelli                                                
| |  |                                                                    
| |  | John A. Morelli
      Chief Financial Officer
      August 14, 2002



Page 22