alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.1  I, Roy Brown, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Zena Capital Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.   Date: June 29, 2006  Roy Brown______________ Chief Financial Officer
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2838 

To extend the duty suspension on Trimethyl cyclo hexanol. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 9, 2005 

Mr. BROWN of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the duty suspension on Trimethyl cyclo hexanol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRIMETHYL CYCLO HEXANOL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.05.03 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Trimethyl cyclo hexanol) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

7 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
Exhibit 13.1





PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350











In connection with this Annual Report of Top Ships Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Evangelos J. Pistiolis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date: April 11, 2012














/s/ Evangelos J. Pistiolis


Evangelos J. Pistiolis


Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
```

[106th Congress Public Law 302]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ302.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 1062]]

Public Law 106-302
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To extend the authorization for the Air Force Memorial Foundation to 
        establish a memorial in the District of Columbia or its 
            environs. <<NOTE: Oct. 13, 2000 -  [H.R. 4583]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Act entitled 
``An Act to authorize the Air Force Memorial Foundation to establish a 
memorial in the District of Columbia or its environs'', approved 
December 2, 1993 (Public Law 103-163), is amended by adding at the end 
the following new section:

``SEC. 4. LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY. <<NOTE: 40 USC 1003 note.>> 

    ``Notwithstanding section 10(b) of the Commemorative Works Act (40 
U.S.C. 1010(b)), the legislative authority for the Air Force Memorial 
Foundation to establish a memorial under this Act shall expire on 
December 2, 2005.''.

    Approved October 13, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4583:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 106-817 (Comm. on Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            Sept. 12, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 3, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-50703

Summary Calendar

_____________________

RODNEY LEE McDOWELL,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM H. BROOK,

Respondent-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-96-CA-125

_________________________________________________________________

January 22, 1997

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rodney Lee McDowell appeals the district court's dismissal of

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit, which the court below construed as a

request for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Neither federal habeas

nor a civil rights suit offer McDowell any remedy. See Orellana v.

Kyle, 65 F.3d 29, 31 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 736

(1996); Thomas v. Torres, 717 F.2d 248, 248-49 (5th Cir. 1983),

cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1010 (1984). Thus, assuming the certificate
-2-

of appealability (“COA”) requirement applies and that McDowell's

notice of appeal is an implicit request for such (see FED. R. APP.

P. 22(b)), a COA is DENIED. 

McDowell's appeal is frivolous and is DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R.

42.2.

We caution McDowell that any additional frivolous appeals

filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of

sanctions. To avoid sanctions, McDowell is further cautioned to

review all pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise

arguments that are frivolous.

COA DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
### §49. Extension of cooperative work to Puerto Rico

The provisions of law authorizing the making of topographic and geological surveys and conducting investigations relating to mineral and water resources by the United States Geological Survey in various portions of the United States be, and the same are, extended to authorize such surveys and investigations in Puerto Rico.

(June 17, 1935, ch. 268, 49 Stat. 386.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out under section 1451 of this title.
Order entered June 5 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 14 - 0071 3 - CR No. 05 - 14 - 0714 - CR No. 05 - 14 - 00715 - CR MICHAEL DAN ALLEN JO HNSON, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 366th Judicial Dis trict Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 366 - 81546 - 2013, 366 - 81547 - 2013 , 366 - 81548 - 2013 

### O RDER The Court notes that appellant’s brief cites to a lengthy Volume 2 of the reporter’s record, which appears to be the transcription of the trial t estimony. However, the Volume 2 filed in this Court consists of 6 pages only, plus the separately filed exhibits that were admitted into evidence during the trial. Accordingly, we ORDER court reporter Jenny Bonnes Hoyt to file, with in FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, an amended Volume 2 of the reporter’s record that contains the complete record of the proceedings conducted on April 11, 2014. Appellant has three appeals pending in this Court: 05 - 14 - 00713 - CR, 05 - 14 - 00714 - CR, and 05 - 14 - 00715 - CR. On June 1, 2015, counsel filed a brief that lists all three appellate numbers and briefing addresses the convictions in each case. However, the brief only raises issues as tothe conviction for aggravated kidnapping, which is the appeal in cause no. 05 - 14 - 00 713 - CR. The

brief raises no issues as to the convictions for possession of child pornography (05 - 14 - 00714 - CR) or aggravated sexual assault of a child (05 - 14 - 00715 - CR). Nor did counsel file a motion to withdraw as counsel and an Anders brief in support ass erting that there are no arguable issues to raise as to the convictions in cause nos. 05 - 14 - 00714 - CR or 05 - 14 - 00715 - CR. Therefore, appellant’s brief is only properly applied to cause no. 05 - 14 - 00713 - CR, and appellant is effectively without a brief in caus e nos. 05 - 14 - 00714 - CR and 05 - 14 - 00715 - CR. Accordingly, we ORDER counsel to file, within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order, either: (1) a motion to dismiss the appeals in cause nos. 05 - 14 - 00714 - CR and 05 - 14 - 00715 - CR that complies with Texas Rule of App ellate Procedure 42.2(a); (2) a brief raising issues on the merits for cause nos. 05 - 14 - 00714 - CR and 05 - 14 - 00715 - CR; or (3) a motion to withdraw as counsel in cause nos. 05 - 14 - 00714 - CR and 05 - 14 - 00715 - CR and a brief in support of that motion that complies with the requirements of Anders v. California and its progeny. We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to Jenney Bonnes Hoyt, court reporter, and to counsel for all parties. /s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
§ 886.119 Responsibilities of the owner. ( a ) The Owner shall be responsible for management and maintenance of the project in conformance with requirements of the Regulatory Agreement. These responsibilities shall include but not be limited to: ( 1 ) Payment for utilities and services (unless paid directly by the Family), insurance and taxes;
( 2 ) Performance of all ordinary and extraordinary maintenance;
( 3 ) Performance of all management functions, including the taking of applications; determining eligibility of applicants in accordance with part 5 of this title; selection of families, including verification of income, in accordance with part 5 of this title, obtaining and verifying Social Security Numbers submitted by applicants (as provided by part 5, subpart B, of this title), obtaining signed consent forms from applicants for the obtaining of wage and claim information from State Wage Information Collection Agencies (as provided in part 5, subpart B, of this title), and other pertinent requirements; and determination of the amount of tenant rent in accordance with HUD established schedules and criteria.
( 4 ) Collection of Tenant Rents;
( 5 ) Termination of tenancies, including evictions;
( 6 ) Preparation and furnishing of information required under the Contract;
( 7 ) Reexamination of family income and composition, redetermination, as appropriate, of the amount of Tenant Rent and the amount of housing assistance payment in accordance with part 5 of this title; collection of rent; obtaining and verifying participant Social Security Numbers, as provided by part 5, subpart B, of this title; and obtaining signed consent forms from participants for the obtaining of wage and claim information from State Wage Information Collection Agencies, as provided by part 5, subpart B, of this title.
( 8 ) Redeterminations of amount of Tenant Rent and amount of Housing Assistance Payment in accordance with part 5 of this title as a result of an adjustment by HUD of any applicable Utility Allowance; and
( 9 ) Compliance with equal opportunity requirements.
( b ) In the event of a financial default under the project mortgage, HUD shall have the right to make subsequent Housing Assistance Payments to the mortgagee until such time as the default is cured, or, at the option of the mortgagee and subject to HUD approval, until some other agreed-upon time.
( c ) Subject to HUD approval, any Owner may contract with any private or public entity to perform for a fee the services required by paragraph (a) of this section: *Provided,* That such contract shall not shift any of the Owner's responsibilities or obligations.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2502-0204) [42 FR 5603, Jan. 28, 1977, as amended at 49 FR 19948, May 10, 1984; 51 FR 11227, Apr. 1, 1986; 53 FR 847, Jan. 13, 1988; 53 FR 1165, Jan. 15, 1988; 53 FR 3368, Feb. 5, 1988; 53 FR 6601, Mar. 2, 1988; 54 FR 39708, Sept. 27, 1989; 56 FR 7542, Feb. 22, 1991; 60 FR 14846, Mar. 20, 1995; 61 FR 9047, Mar. 6, 1996; 61 FR 11119, Mar. 18, 1996; 65 FR 16723, Mar. 29, 2000]
#### In the Matter of Louis A. Bezio, Appellant, v. Lester W. Berglund, as Judge of the City Court of Jamestown, et al., Respondents.

Order of substitution of party entered.
Motion Granted; Order filed April 9, 2020

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00826

- CR

____________ DANIEL VICTOR SALDANA , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 228th District Court

Harris County, T exas Trial Court Cause No. 1541510



### ORDER
Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant filed a motion requesting to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Ande rs v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State , 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The motion is granted.Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 228th District Court to afford

appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accord ance with local procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before April 24, 2020 ; that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to appellant is made; and that appellant file h is pro se brief with this court within thirty days of that date.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Spain.
### SUBCHAPTER III—PARTICULAR PROJECTS
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 32
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Home City Financial Corporation, (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended September 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), we, J. William Stapleton, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating
Officer, and Charles A. Mihal, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ J. William Stapleton                   /s/ Charles A. Mihal
----------------------------------         -------------------------------------
J. William Stapleton                       Charles A. Mihal
Chief Executive Officer and                Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Chief Operating Officer


Date:  November 7, 2003                    Date:     November 7, 2003
     ---------------------                      --------------------------------


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Home City Financial Corporation and will be retained by Home City
Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


                                       24
§ 903.5 When must a PHA submit the plans to HUD? ( a ) *5-Year Plan.* ( 1 ) The first PHA fiscal year that is covered by the requirements of this part as amended on December 22, 2000, is the PHA fiscal year that begins October 2001. This 5-Year Plan submitted by a PHA must be submitted for the 5-year period beginning October 1, 2001.
( 2 ) For all PHAs, the first 5-Year Plans are due 75 days before the commencement of their fiscal year.
( 3 ) For all PHAs, after submission of their first 5-Year Plan, all subsequent 5-Year Plans must be submitted once every 5 PHA fiscal years, no later than 75 days before the commencement of the PHA's fiscal year. However, HUD may require that half of all PHAs with less than 250 public housing units submit their 5-Year Plan one fiscal year in advance (in the fourth PHA fiscal year rather than the fifth PHA fiscal year).
( 4 ) PHAs may choose to update their 5-Year Plans every year as good management practice and must update their 5-Year Plans that were submitted for PHA fiscal years beginning before October 1, 2001, to comply with the requirements of this part as amended on December 22, 2000, at the time they submit their next Annual Plan for fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2001. PHAs must explain any substantial deviation from their 5-Year Plans in their Annual Plans. (Substantial deviation is determined by the PHA in accordance with criteria provided by the PHA in its Annual Plan in accordance with § 903.7(r).)
( b ) *The Annual Plan.* ( 1 ) The first PHA fiscal year that is covered by the requirements of this part as amended on December 22, 2000 is the PHA fiscal year that begins October 1, 2001.
( 2 ) For all PHAs, the first Annual Plans are due 75 days before the commencement of their fiscal year.
( 3 ) For all PHAs, after submission of the first Annual Plan, all subsequent Annual Plans will be due no later than 75 days before the commencement of their fiscal year.
[64 FR 56862, Oct. 21, 1999, as amended at 66 FR 8898, Mar. 7, 2001; 68 FR 37671, June 24, 2003]
C 09-2603 JL 1

THOMAS N. STEWART, III - #88128

ATTORNEY AT LAW

369 BLUE OAK LANE, 2nd FLOOR

CLAYTON, CA 94517

TELEPHONE (925) 672-8452

TELEFAX (925) 673-1729

Attorneys for David Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID JOHNSON, Case No. C 09-2603 JL

Plaintiff, STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; ORDER

v.

DANIEL and JENNIFER YU,

as Trustees, 

Defendants.

__________________________________/ 

 

The parties hereto stipulate as follows:

The parties have reached a full and final settlement of all issues in this action. A

Settlement Agreement between the parties has been fully executed. 

Some parts of the Settlement Agreement are to be performed in the future. The parties

shall comply with their Settlement Agreement, a copy of which is incorporated by reference as

if fully set forth. The parties request the Court to retain jurisdiction for 30 months from the

date hereof in order to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement under the authority of

Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. Of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994).

Case 3:09-cv-02603-JL Document 31 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:09-cv-02603-JL Document29 Filed05/18/10 Page1 of 2
C 09-2603 JL 2

Although the parties are hereby dismissing this action with prejudice, they agree that

the Court will retain jurisdiction over this action and the parties hereto in order to be able to

enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their

designated counsel that this action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP

41(a)(2), and the Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement for

30 months after the date hereof.

Date: May 18, 2010 Date: May 18, 2010

S/William D. Thomson, S/Thomas N. Stewart, III, 

Attorney for Defendants Attorney for Plaintiff

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Date: ________________________________

 Judge/Magistrate

Case 3:09-cv-02603-JL Document 31 Filed 06/21/10 Page 2 of 2 Case3:09-cv-02603-JL Document29 Filed05/18/10 Page2 of 2
#### § 81.101 Equal employment opportunity.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shall comply with sections 1 and 2 of Executive Order 11478 (3 CFR, 1966-1970 Compilation, p. 803), as amended by Executive Order 12106, (3 CFR, 1978, Compilation, p. 263), providing for the adoption and implementation of equal employment opportunity, as required by section 1216 of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (12 U.S.C. 1833e).