T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on a nd i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I TE D FABRI CS I NTERNA TI ON AL, I N C . , aC a l i f

orni aC orpor a t i on, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. L A N E B R Y A N T , IN C . , a D el aw ar e Co rp o r a t i o n ; CH A RM I N G SH O PPES, I N C. ; I N TERN A TI O N A L N EW PO RT G R O U P , aC a lif

o rn iaB u s in e s s E n tity F o rm Un k n o wn E rr o n e o u s l y S u e d As Ne wp o r tAp p a r e l C o rp o r a t i o n ; MOA M O A , I N C ., D efen d an t s - A p p el l an t s, a nd K .E .S . T E X T I L E , I N C ., D e f

e n d a n t. N o. 10- 56169 D . C . N o . 2 : 0 8 - c v - 0 6 8 6 5 - O D WPL A ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia O t i s D . W r i ght , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng 

# FI LED DE C 20 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2 A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r5, 2011

P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia B efo re: D . W . N E L S O N , G O U L D , an d IK U T A , C i rcu i tJu d g es.

T h e A u g u s t 2 0 0 6 r e g is tr a tio n o f “E th n ic C o lle c tio n X ” w a s s u f f ic ie n t to supp ortthi s i nfri ng em entac t i on un der 17 U . S . C . § 4 11 (a ) a nd t o sup po rtthe aw ar d o f a tto rn e y ’s f

e e s u n d e r1 7 U .S .C . § 4 1 2 ( 2 ) . E th n ic C o lle c tio n X m e e ts th e c r ite r ia f o rr e g i s tr a t i o n a s a c o l l e c t i o n o f u n p u b l i s h e d w o rk s u n d e r3 7 C. F. R. § 2 0 2 .3 ( b ) ( 4 ) ( B ) , se e U ni ted Fab ri cs Int ’l

, Inc. v. C &J

W ear, Inc. , 630 F . 3d 1255, 1 2 5 9 (9 th C i r. 2 0 1 1 ), an d th erefo re th e A u g u st2 0 0 6 reg i strat i o n reg i st ered n o tj u st the col l ec t i on as such bu t“ al l copyri gh t abl e e l em ent s [ w i thi n the col l ec t i on ] that a r e o th e rw is e r e c o g n iz ab le a s s e lf - c o n ta in e d w o rk s .” § 2 0 2 .3 ( b ) ( 4 ) ( B ) . T he f a i l ur e of U ni t e d F abr i c s ( “ U F I ” ) t o not e i n i t s appl i c a t i on tha tthe H a i l e y de s i gn i s a de r i va t i ve w ork doe s notr e nde rthe r e gi s tr a t i on i nva l i d; L a ne B ry a n t h a s n e ith e ra r g u e d th a t it d e tr im e n ta lly r e lie d o n th e o m is s io n n o rp o in te d to a n y e v id e n c e th a t U F I in te n d e d to d e f r a u d th e C o p y r ig h t O f

f ic e . Se e J

ul e s J or dan V i deo, Inc. v. 14 49 42 C an ada Inc. , 6 1 7 F .3 d 1 1 4 6 , 1 1 5 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) . F urtherm ore, because E thn i c C ol l ec t i on X w ou l d st i l l have been regi st er abl e e ven i f the de r i va t i ve na tur e of the H a i l e y de s i gn ha d be e n not e d i n the appl i c a t i on, the3

o m is s io n w a s im m a te r ia l. Se e i d. ; s e e al s o M el vi l l e B . N i m m er& D avi d N i m m er , N i m m e ron C opy r i

ght § 7 .2 0 [ B ][ 1 ]. L a n e B ry a n t h a s w a iv e d its a r g u m e n ts th a t th e e v id e n c e w a s in s u f f ic ie n t to s uppor tthe j ury ’ s ve r di c ttha tL a ne B ry a nt , I nc . a nd N e w por tA ppa r e l C orp. w illf u lly in f r in g e d U F I ’s c o p y r ig h t a n d th a t N e w p o r t A p p a r e l C o rp ., L a n e B ry a n t, In c. , an d C h arm i n g S h o p p es, In c. v i cari o u sl y i n fri n g ed U F I’ s co p yri g h t , b ecau se L a ne B ry a ntdi d notf

i l e a R ul e 50( b) pos t - tr i a l m ot i on f orj udgm e nta s a m a tt e rof la w . See U

ni therm Foo d S

ys . , Inc. v. Sw i

f t-E ckri ch, Inc. , 546 U . S . 394, 400–01 ( 2 0 0 6 ) ; F e d . R . C iv . P . 5 0 ( b ) . L ane B ry anthas a l so w ai ved i t s a rgum entthatP l ai nt i ff’ s S peci al Jury I ns truc t i on N o. 1 w a s e rr one ous . L a ne B ry a ntdi d notobj e c tt o the i ns truc t i on on th e r e c o r d . See F e d . R . C iv . P . 5 1 ; Me d tr o n ic , I n c . v . W h ite , 526 F . 3d 487, 495 ( 9th C i r . 2008) ( not i ng tha t , t o be va l i d, a n obj e c t i on t o aj ury i ns truc t i on m us tbe m ade on the re cord and st at e the grou nd s f or obj ec t i on ). N othi ng i n the re cord s u g g e s ts th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u r t k n e w L a n e B ry a n t’s g r o u n d f o rd is a g r e e m e n t w ith th e in s tru c tio n . Se e Me d tr o n ic , 526 F . 3d a t495 . N o rd o e s th is in s tru c tio n c a ll in to qu es t i on the i nt egri ty or f un dam ent al fa i rnes s of the proceedi ng s i n the di stri ct c o u r t. See J

e r de n v . A m s tu tz , 43 0 F . 3d 12 31 , 12 36 n. 4 (9th C i r. 20 05 ).4

T he di s tr i c tc our tdi d note rri n e xc l udi ng C hr i s t i naH ut c hi ngs ’ s t e s t i m ony w ith r e g a r d to o v e rh e a d e x p e n s e s L a n e B ry a n t, I n c . p u rp o r te d ly in c u rr e d in conn ec t i on w i th the sa l e of the i nfri ng i ng garm ent s. B ec ause H ut chi ng s t es t i fi ed tha ts he ha d notbe e n a s ke d t o de t e rm i ne the a m ountof ove rhe a d a ttr i but abl e t o the s a l e of the i nf r i ngi ng ga rm e nt s a nd tha ts he c a l c ul a t e d ove rhe a d e xpe ns e s w i thout re gard t o w hether tho se expenses ac tual l y r el at ed t o the sa l es of the garm ent s a t i ss ue, she w ou l d h ave been unable t o t es t i fyre gardi ng the re l evantl egal i ss ue, s pe c i f i c a l l y w he the r“ the c a t e gor i e s of ove rhe a d a c tua l l y c ontr i but e d t o s a l e s of the i nfri ng i ng w ork. ” Frank Musi c C orp. v. Metro-G oldw yn-M ayer , Inc. , 772 F . 2d 5 0 5 , 5 1 6 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 8 5 ) ; se e al so Kam ar Int ’l

, Inc. v. R uss B erri e & C o. , Inc. , 752 F . 2d 13 26 , 13 32 (9th C i r. 19 84 ). T he di stri ctcourterre d i n excl ud i ng L ane B ry ant ’ s proff er ed evi dence that N e w p o r t A p p a r e l C o rp . h a d s o ld a d r e s s th a t d id n o t in c lu d e th e in f r in g in g f ab r ic de s i gn, butw hi c h ha d a n i de nt i c a l s i l houe tt e a nd c uta s the i nf r i ngi ng ga rm e nt , t o a com pet i ng re t ai l erfor ahi gh erpri ce than thatatw hi ch the i nfri ng i ng garm entw as s ol d t o L a ne B ry a nt , I nc . T hi s e vi de nc e w a s r e l e va ntt o the i s s ue of appor t i onm e nt b ecau se i tsu g g est ed th atatl eastso m e o f th e v al u e o f th e i n fri n g i n g g arm en taro se f r o m f e a tu r e s o th e rth a n th e in f r in g in g f ab r ic d e s ig n . A lth o u g h th is e v id e n c e d id notpr ovi de a m a the m a t i c a l l y pr e c i s e m e thod of de t e rm i ni ng w ha tpor t i on of L a neO n r e m a n d , if th e d is tr ic t c o u r t d e te rm in e s th a t th e ap p o r tio n m e n t is s u e is 1 n o t s u f f ic ie n tly s e p a r ab le f

r o m th e o th e rd a m a g e s is s u e s in th is c a s e , o rth a t a r e tr ia l o n th e ap p o r tio n m e n t is s u e a lo n e w o u ld w o rk a n in ju s tic e to th e p a r tie s , it m a y c onduc ta f

ul l r e tr i a l on da m a ge s a nd w oul d notbe pr e c l ude d f r om consi deri ng any a dd i t i on al evi dence adduced by L ane B ry antre gardi ng ov erhead e x p e n s e s . C

f . C oas tal A bs tr ac t Se r v . , I nc . v . F i rs t

A m . T i t l e I ns . C o. , 173 F . 3d 725, 732–33 ( 9th C i r . 1999) . C onve r s e l y , i f the di s tr i c tc our tde t e rm i ne s tha tthe appor t i onm e nti s s ue i s s uf f i c i e nt l y s e pa r abl e , a nd tha ti ti s f a i rt o the pa r t i e s , the c o u r t m a y h a v e a r e tr ia l o n th a t is s u e a lo n e . Se e Fr a n k Mu s ic , 772 F . 2d a t519; P olarB e arP r ods . , I

nc . v . T i m ex C or p. , 38 4 F . 3d 70 0, 71 0 (9th C i r. 20 04 ). 5 B ry ant ’ s profi t s w er e a ttri bu t abl e t o n on -i nfri ng i ng as pect s of the garm ent , such p r e c is io n is n o t r e q u ir e d . Se e Fr a n k Mu s ic , 772 F . 2d a t518. O n r e m a nd, the di s tr i c tc our tm us tc ons i de rthe e vi de nc e a dduc e d by L a ne B ry a nta nd de t e rm i ne w he the ri t“ s ugge s t s s om e di vi s i on w hi c h m a y r a t i ona l l y be us e d a s a s pr i ngboa r d” to m a k e a n ap p o r tio n m e n t. Cr e am R e c or ds , I nc . v . J os . Sc hl i t zB r e w i ng C o. , 754 1 F . 2d 826, 829 ( 9th C i r . 1985) . T h e p a r tie s s h a ll b e a rth e iro w n c o s ts o n ap p e a l. A F F IR M E D i n p art, R E V E R S E D i n p art, an d R E M A N D E D for f u rt h er p ro ceed i n g s.