alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 327 Received in Senate (RDS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 327

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 12, 2005

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To allow binding arbitration clauses to be included in all contracts 
   affecting land within the Gila River Indian Community Reservation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BINDING ARBITRATION FOR GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY 
              RESERVATION CONTRACTS.

    (a) Amendments.--Subsection (f) of the first section of the Act of 
August 9, 1955 (25 U.S.C. 415(f)), is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence--
                    (A) by striking ``Any lease'' and all that follows 
                through ``affecting land'' and inserting ``Any 
                contract, including a lease, affecting land''; and
                    (B) by striking ``such lease or contract'' and 
                inserting ``such contract''; and
            (2) in the second sentence, by striking ``Such leases or 
        contracts entered into pursuant to such Acts'' and inserting 
        ``Such contracts''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in Public Law 107-159 (116 Stat. 122).

            Passed the House of Representatives December 7, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 21

- 40921 Summary Calendar

Undra Cornelious,

Plaintiff

— Appellant ,

versus

Kirt Steifer, Warden, Michael Unit ,
Defendant

— Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:20

- CV

- 621

Before Stewart, Haynes, and Ho, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : *

Undra Cornelious, Texas prisoner # 2140750 , has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal of a case where the district

court dismiss ed hi s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint with prejudice for failure to
state a claim. However, the appeal is both improper and untimely. First, he

* Pursuant to 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5.4

. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 3, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-40921 Document: 00516344151 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/03/2022No. 21

- 40921

2 appeals only the magistrate judge’s recommendation, not the district judge’s final judgment; we lack jurisdiction over that appeal. Further, his appeal is untimely, and he fails to assert any basis for extending the time for appeal. Accordingly, IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED

. Case: 21-40921 Document: 00516344151 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/03/2022
### §80304. Limitation on ice patrol data

Notwithstanding sections 80301 and 80302, data collected by an ice patrol conducted by the Coast Guard under this chapter may not be disseminated to a vessel unless such vessel is—

(1) documented under the laws of the United States; or

(2) documented under the laws of a foreign country that made the payment or contribution required under section 80301(b) for the year preceding the year in which the data is collected.

(Added Pub. L. 113–281, title III, §314(a)(3), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 3049.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 2017, see section 314(c) of Pub. L. 113–281, set out as an Effective Date of 2014 Amendment note under section 80301 of this title.
§ 886.139 Emergency transfers for victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking. ( a ) Covered housing providers must develop and implement an emergency transfer plan that meets the requirements in 24 CFR 5.2005(e).
( b ) In order to facilitate emergency transfers for victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking, covered housing providers have discretion to adopt new, and modify any existing, admission preferences or transfer waitlist priorities.
( c ) In addition to following requirements in 24 CFR 5.2005(e), when a safe unit is not immediately available for a victim of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking who qualifies for an emergency transfer, covered housing providers must: ( 1 ) Review the covered housing provider's existing inventory of units and determine when the next vacant unit may be available; and
( 2 ) Provide a listing of nearby HUD subsidized rental properties, with or without preference for persons of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking, and contact information for the local HUD field office.
( d ) Each year, covered housing providers must submit to HUD data on all emergency transfers requested under 24 CFR 5.2005(e), including data on the outcomes of such requests.
[81 FR 80814, Nov. 16, 2016]
#### J. W. Johnson-Winco Corp., Respondent, v. L S B Auction Products, Inc., Appellant.

Judgment in favor of plaintiff following the granting of plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs to abide the event, and the motion for summary judgment denied. Upon the verified pleadings and opposing affidavits an issue is raised which must await trial as to whether the goods delivered to defendant were shipped pursuant to a consignment agreement that would maintain title in plaintiff or whether they were sold outright to defendant. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Bastow, JJ.
#### § 883.605 Leasing to eligible families.

The provisions of 24 CFR 880.504 apply to this section, including reference at 24 CFR 880.504(f) to the requirements of 24 CFR part 5, subpart L (Protection for Victims of Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, or Stalking), subject to the requirements of § 883.105.

[81 FR 80813, Nov. 16, 2016]
### **CHAPTER 1—SAFETY APPLIANCES AND EQUIPMENT ON RAILROAD ENGINES AND CARS, AND PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEES AND TRAVELERS**
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Aurelio Resource Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-KSB/A for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Stephen B. Doppler, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.



|                         |  |  |  |                              |  |                        |  |                        
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                         |  |  |  | AURELIO RESOURCE COPRORATION
|                         |  |  | 
|Date: September 15, 2008 |  |  |  | By:                          |  | /s/ Stephen B. Doppler
|                         |  |  |  |                              |  |                        |  | Stephen B. Doppler     
|                         |  |  |  |                              |  |                        |  | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Aurelio Resource Corporation and will be retained by Aurelio
Resource Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
U.S. International Trade Commission

Publication 4204 December 2010

Washington, DC 20436

In the Matter of

Investigation No. 337-TA-636

Certain Laser Imageable 

Lithographic Printing Plates
U.S. International Trade Commission

COMMISSIONERS 

Shara L. Aranoff, Chairman 

Daniel R. Pearson, Vice Chairman 

Deanna Tanner Okun 

Charlotte R. Lane 

Irving A. Williamson 

Dean A. Pinkert 

Address all communications to 

Secretary to the Commission 

United States International Trade Commission 

Washington, DC 20436
U.S. International Trade Commission

Washington, DC 20436 

www.usitc.gov

Publication 4204 December 2010

In the Matter of

Investigation No. 337-TA-636

Certain Laser Imageable 

Lithographic Printing Plates
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3220

To suspend temporarily the duty on parachlorobenzotrifluoride. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 12, 2005

Mr. BUYER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on 

parachlorobenzotrifluoride.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PARACHLOROBENZOTRIFLUORIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.11.05 1-Chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl) 

benzene (CAS No. 95–56–6) 

(provided for in subheading 

2903.69.08) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2

•HR 3220 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### Hotel Armstrong, Inc., v. Temporary State Housing Rent Commission et al.

Motion for restitution of money to escrow fund denied without prejudice, however, to a similar motion at Special Term. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
#### § 891.675 Prohibited facilities.

The requirements for prohibited facilities for 202/162 projects are provided in § 891.315, except that Section 202/162 projects may not include commercial spaces.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 332 

To amend the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act 

of 1996 to require that, in order to determine that a democratically 

elected government in Cuba exists, the government extradite to the 

United States convicted felon William Morales and all other individuals 

who are living in Cuba in order to escape prosecution or confinement 

for criminal offenses committed in the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2005 

Mr. KING of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on International Relations 

A BILL 

To amend the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity 

(LIBERTAD) Act of 1996 to require that, in order 

to determine that a democratically elected government 

in Cuba exists, the government extradite to the United 

States convicted felon William Morales and all other 

individuals who are living in Cuba in order to escape 

prosecution or confinement for criminal offenses committed in the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 332 IH 

1 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO LIBERTAD ACT. 

2 Section 206 of the Cuban Liberty and Democratic 

3 Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996 (22 U.S.C. 6066) 

4 is amended— 

5 (1) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘and’’ after 

6 the semicolon; 

7 (2) in paragraph (6), by striking the period and 

8 inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

9 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(7) has proven its respect for the democratic 

11 rule of law by ceasing to provide a safe harbor to 

12 individuals who have been legally indicted or con13 victed of serious criminal offenses, including con14 victed felon William Morales, and all other individ15 uals who have fled from the United States to Cuba 

16 for the sole purpose of avoiding prosecution or con17 finement for serious criminal offenses committed in 

18 the United States.’’. 

Æ
#### Blanche Costello, Respondent, v Margaret Rose Casale, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[835 NYS2d 354]—

In an action, inter alia, to recover a down payment on a contract for the sale of real property, the defendant Margaret Rose Casale appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.), entered July 17, 2006, which denied that branch of her motion which was to vacate a judgment of the same court (Nastasi, J.), dated April 18, 2001, which was in favor of the plaintiff and against her in the principal sum of $26,800.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law and as an exercise of discretion, by adding a provision thereto vacating the restraining notice on the appellant’s bank accounts at HSBC; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant’s claim, the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, properly entered judgment in this action pursuant to the order of this Court dated March 26, 2001 *(see*CPLR 5016 [b]; *Costello v Casale,*281 AD2d 581, 582 [2001]). The appellant’s contention that the plaintiff was not entitled to an award of interest on the judgment is without merit *(see*CPLR 5001 [a]).

However, we agree with the appellant that the restraining notice on her bank accounts at HSBC in the amount of $48,473.73 is unduly harsh, since her attorneys had already returned to the plaintiff the down payment in the amount of $26,800, and the outstanding balance on the judgment pertains only to costs and interest. Accordingly, we vacate the restraining notice pursuant to CFLR 5240 in order to prevent “unreasonable annoyance, expense, embarrassment, disadvantage or other prejudice” *(Paz v Long Is. R.R.,*241 AD2d 486, 487 [1997]). Schmidt, J.P., Rivera, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3319 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3319

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exemption from 
 the harbor maintenance tax for certain shipping between United States 
                            mainland ports.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 18, 2005

   Mr. Weldon of Florida (for himself and Mr. Shays) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exemption from 
 the harbor maintenance tax for certain shipping between United States 
                            mainland ports.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Short Sea Shipping Tax Exemption Act 
of 2005''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM HARBOR MAINTENANCE TAX FOR CERTAIN SHIPPING 
              BETWEEN UNITED STATES MAINLAND PORTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 4462 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by redesignating subsection (i) as subsection (j) and by 
inserting after subsection (h) the following new subsection:
    ``(i) Exemption for Certain Shipping Between United States Mainland 
Ports.--No tax shall be imposed under section 4461(a) with respect to--
            ``(1) cargo contained in intermodal cargo containers and 
        loaded by crane on a vessel or cargo loaded on a vessel by 
        means of wheeled technology in a port in the United States 
        mainland for transportation to another port in the United 
        States mainland solely by coastal route or river (or 
        combination thereof), and
            ``(2) the unloading of cargo described in paragraph (1) in 
        a port in the United States mainland.
For purposes of this subsection, the term `United States mainland' has 
the meaning given such term in subsection (b).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 321

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a refundable credit 

to certain senior citizens for premiums paid for coverage under Medicare 

Part B. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2005

Mrs. EMERSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a 

refundable credit to certain senior citizens for premiums 

paid for coverage under Medicare Part B.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Notch Baby Health 

5 Care Relief Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PREMIUMS PAID BY CERTAIN SENIOR CITIZENS 

7 FOR MEDICARE PART B. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subpart C of part IV of sub9 chapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 
2

•HR 321 IH 

1 1986 (relating to refundable credits) is amended by redes2 ignating section 36 as section 37 and by inserting after 

3 section 35 the following new section: 

4 ‘‘SEC. 36. PREMIUMS PAID BY CERTAIN SENIOR CITIZENS 

5 FOR MEDICARE PART B. 

6 ‘‘(a) ALLOWANCE OF CREDIT.—In the case of an eli7 gible individual, there shall be allowed as a credit against 

8 the tax imposed by this subtitle for the taxable year an 

9 amount equal to the aggregate premiums paid under sec10 tion 1840 of the Social Security Act by the taxpayer dur11 ing the taxable year for enrollment of the eligible indi12 vidual under part B of title XVIII of such Act. 

13 ‘‘(b) ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUAL.—For purposes of sub14 section (a), the term ‘eligible individual’ means—

15 ‘‘(1) an individual born after 1916 and before 

16 1927 who had wages or self-employment income 

17 credited for one or more years prior to 1979 and 

18 who was not eligible for an old-age or disability in19 surance benefit, and did not die, prior to January 

20 1979, 

21 ‘‘(2) the spouse (as determined under section 

22 7703) of an individual described in paragraph (1), 

23 and 

24 ‘‘(3) the widow or widower, as the case may be, 

25 of an individual described in paragraph (1).’’. 
3

•HR 321 IH 

1 (b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.—

2 (1) Paragraph (2) of section 1324(b) of title 

3 31, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘or 

4 enacted’’ and inserting ‘‘enacted’’ and by inserting 

5 before the period ‘‘, or from section 36 of such 

6 Code’’. 

7 (2) The table of sections for subpart C of part 

8 IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 is amended by striking the last 

10 item and inserting the following new items:

‘‘Sec. 36. Premiums paid by certain senior citizens for medicare part B. 

‘‘Sec. 37. Overpayments of tax.’’.

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply to premiums paid after the date 

13 of enactment of this Act.

Æ
### §494. Pecuniary penalty for nonpayment of operation charge

If any operation or maintenance charge is unpaid on the 1st day of the third calendar month after it became due a penalty of 1 per centum of the amount unpaid shall be added thereto, and thereafter an additional penalty of one-half of 1 per centum of the amount unpaid shall be added on the 1st day of each calendar month if such charge and penalties shall remain unpaid.

(Aug. 13, 1914, ch. 247, §6, 38 Stat. 688; Dec. 5, 1924, ch. 4, §4, subsec. H, 43 Stat. 703.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of part of first sentence of section 6 of act Aug. 13, 1914. Remainder of first sentence of such section 6 is classified to sections 479, 493 and 495 of this title; second and third sentences of such section 6 are classified to sections 496 and 497 of this title, respectively.

Act Dec. 5, 1924, reduced the additional penalty from 1 per centum to one-half of 1 per centum.
DRAWING NUMBER
LM=1%O

|

| Madre, TX

DRAWING NUMBER
1: 100, 06d

|
|
|

| DRAWING NUMBER

L ry oo

}
i Snes |

fe) =
o o
N =)
so a @s
= S a ©
° © oG
¢ NL Ny
5 - -O
o. S
« ~ a
S te)
op) loph
I
s 4 .
= z=)
Qa. =)
o te)
S o
« a
S te)
° ron)
i}
5 | =)
o i
~ “
-_ “4
« —]
D Te)
° D
1
ro) 3S
So a)
a) S
- —
s _-
© |, 3
° rep)
1 | 9
S b
ao) 2
QI +r
= A)
ss _
D ©
? fon)
1
Q° 8
=)
oS 2
a: hn
con)
m. =)
© ,
te)
? o
!
Q ~
Q
. can)
oO ~
©
:. o
‘=
o te)
' rea)
i
5: _
é o
S ~
a ‘A +
s
® ©
' fon)
; 1
a2) s
2 fo)
3 Oo
sed ~
s
« sf
e a
on =
fon)
1
S 3
© r)
_ oO.
rs ~
2 +
& fe)
o (—]
an Te)
oO
1
S 3
i cas)
¢ ro
S ~
. jo
ea s N . at
a ron) s s ~ c
loner) oO S a=) on
i: 2 o oo
j=) + x ~ ee
=) Me) S © com)
s es < om a)
ft & ; & 8
: N wi

~ MADRE
SCALE:

- N265096W.

1:100,000:

DRAWING NUA
|

LM 180.

NOS MULTIBEAM SURVEYS |
Contours in corrected meters

 pmigo

MRD
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT GIOVANNI CRUZ, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3948 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed February 21, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Laura E. Ward, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KHOUZAM, BLACK, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.