alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Frieda Feinman et al., Appellants, v. Incorporated Village of Ocean Beach, Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered November 18, 1960 denying their motion for a preference in trial on the ground of destitution, pursuant to rule 151 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
ub |
mi |
ma]

CORRECTED METERS

Pp _
PRELIMINARY

PORT ORFORD, OR COPY
#6 tt G2

CONTOURS IN CORRES TE2 WETERS
§ 886.123 Maintenance, operation, and inspections. ( a ) *Maintenance and operation.* The Owner shall maintain and operate the project so as to provide housing that is compliant with 24 CFR part 5, subpart G, and the Owner shall provide all the services, maintenance, and utilities which the Owner agrees to provide under the Contract, subject to abatement of housing assistance payments or other applicable remedies if the Owner fails to meet these obligations.
( b ) *Inspection prior to occupancy.* Prior to occupancy of any unit by a Family, the Owner and the Family shall inspect the unit. On forms prescribed by HUD, the Owner and Family shall certify that they have inspected the unit, and the owner shall certify that the unit is compliant with 24 CFR part 5, subpart G, and with the criteria provided in the prescribed forms. Copies of these reports shall be kept on file by the Owner for at least three years.
( c ) *Periodic inspections.* HUD will inspect or cause to be inspected the contract units in accordance with the requirements in 24 CFR part 5, subpart G, and at such other times as may be necessary to assure that the owner is meeting contractual obligations.
( d ) *Units not free of health and safety hazards.* If HUD notifies the Owner that the Owner has failed to maintain a unit that is compliant with the requirements in 24 CFR part 5, subpart G, and the Owner fails to take corrective action within the time prescribed by notice, HUD may exercise any of its rights or remedies under the Contract, including abatement of housing assistance payments, even if the Family continues to occupy the unit.
[88 FR 30500, May 11, 2023]
|   Subsidiaries                    |   | State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation |   | Percentage Ownership |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------|--------|
|                                        |   |                                         |   |                 |   |
| Kearny Federal Savings Bank                 |   | United States                                |   |                 | 100    | % |
|                                        |   |                                         |   |                 |   |   |
| Subsidiaries of Kearny Federal Savings Bank |   |                                         |   |                 |   |   |
|                                        |   |                                         |   |                 |   |   |
| KFS Financial Services, Inc.                |   | New Jersey                                   |   |                 | 100    | % |
| KFS Investment Corp.                        |   | New Jersey                                   |   |                 | 100    | % |
| CJB Investment Corp.                        |   | New Jersey                                   |   |                 | 100    | % |
|                                        |   |                                         |   |                 |   |   |
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
  **Pursuant
        to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 **(Subsections
        (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
        Code)**
  Pursuant
        to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b)
        of
        section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
        undersigned officers of Orsus Xelent Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation
        (the “ *Company* ”),
        does
        hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
  The
        Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the
“ *Form
        10-K* ”)
        of the
        Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the Form 10-K
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
        of operations of the Company.
   Date: April
        1, 2008
 /s/
                    Wang XinWang XinChief Executive Officer
 
 Date:
        April 1, 2008  /s/
                    Zhao HongweiZhao HongweiChief Executive Officer
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
        and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §9914. Monitoring of eligible entities

#### (a) In general

In order to determine whether eligible entities meet the performance goals, administrative standards, financial management requirements, and other requirements of a State, the State shall conduct the following reviews of eligible entities:

(1) A full onsite review of each such entity at least once during each 3-year period.

(2) An onsite review of each newly designated entity immediately after the completion of the first year in which such entity receives funds through the community services block grant program.

(3) Followup reviews including prompt return visits to eligible entities, and their programs, that fail to meet the goals, standards, and requirements established by the State.

(4) Other reviews as appropriate, including reviews of entities with programs that have had other Federal, State, or local grants (other than assistance provided under this chapter) terminated for cause.

#### (b) Requests

The State may request training and technical assistance from the Secretary as needed to comply with the requirements of this section.

#### (c) Evaluations by the Secretary

The Secretary shall conduct in several States in each fiscal year evaluations (including investigations) of the use of funds received by the States under this chapter in order to evaluate compliance with the provisions of this chapter, and especially with respect to compliance with section 9908(b) of this title. The Secretary shall submit, to each State evaluated, a report containing the results of such evaluations, and recommendations of improvements designed to enhance the benefit and impact of the activities carried out with such funds for people in need. On receiving the report, the State shall submit to the Secretary a plan of action in response to the recommendations contained in the report. The results of the evaluations shall be submitted annually to the Chairperson of the Committee on Education and the Workforce of the House of Representatives and the Chairperson of the Committee on Labor and Human Resources of the Senate as part of the report submitted by the Secretary in accordance with section 9917(b)(2) of this title.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §678B, as added Pub. L. 105–285, title II, §201, Oct. 27, 1998, 112 Stat. 2743.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Labor and Human Resources of Senate changed to Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of Senate by Senate Resolution No. 20, One Hundred Sixth Congress, Jan. 19, 1999.
### Archive of side scan sonar and bathymetry data collected during USGS Cruise 06FSH01 offshore of Siesta Key, Florida, May 2006

By: Katherine T. CiembronowiczJames G. Flocks**Dana S. WieseNancy T. DeWitt**Nick F. FerinaLisa L. Robbins**Arnell S. Harrison**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds291

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

This DVD publication was prepared by an agency of the United States Government. Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the U.S. Geological Survey, no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the display or utility of the data on any other system, or for general or scientific purposes, nor shall the act of distribution imply any such warranty. The U.S. Geological Survey shall not be held liable for improper or incorrect use of the data described and (or) contained herein. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof.

#### Study Area
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

 OF FLORIDA 

 SECOND DISTRICT 

RYAN J. SIMMONS, ) 

 ) 

 Appellant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D16-3871 

 ) 

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) 

 ) 

 Appellee. )

___________________________________) 

Opinion filed September 15, 2017. 

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Manatee County; Susan B. Maulucci, 

Judge. 

Ryan J. Simmons, pro se. 

LaROSE, Chief Judge. 

Ryan J. Simmons, pro se, appeals the postconviction court's order 

summarily denying his motion for return of property. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2); 

Bolden v. State, 875 So. 2d 780, 782 n.3 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). The postconviction court 

denied the motion as untimely but failed to attach the judgment and sentence. We 

reverse and remand for the postconviction court to attach portions of the record that 

conclusively refute Mr. Simmons' claim or hold an evidentiary hearing on the matter. 
- 2 - 

See Almeda v. State, 959 So. 2d 806, 809 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ("[I]f the circuit court 

deemed the motion's allegations to be facially sufficient, the circuit court should have 

either attached portions of the record that conclusively refuted Mr. Almeda's claim or 

held an evidentiary hearing."); Stevens v. State, 929 So. 2d 1197, 1197 (Fla. 2d DCA 

2006). 

Reversed and remanded with instructions. 

 

MORRIS and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 231 (Tuesday, December 1, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 77261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26554]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act: Notice of Agency Meeting

TIME AND DATE:  10:00 a.m., Wednesday, December 2, 2020.

PLACE:  Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, the meeting will be open to the 
public via live webcast only. Visit the agency's homepage 
(www.ncua.gov) and access the provided webcast link.

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    1. Board Briefing, NCUA's 2021-2022 Budget.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks, 
Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2020-26554 Filed 11-27-20; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
#### McWILLIAMS, Respondent, v. YELLOW PINE CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 3, 1905.)

Action by Frank McWilliams against the Yellow Pine Company.

PER CURIAM.

Judgmeht and order affirmed, with costs.

HOOKER, J., not voting.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Aurelio Resource Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-KSB/A for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Frederick Warnaars, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.



|                         |  |  |  |                              |  |                        |  |                        
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                         |  |  |  | AURELIO RESOURCE COPRORATION
|                         |  |  | 
|Date: September 15, 2008 |  |  |  | By:                          |  | /s/ Frederick Warnaars
|                         |  |  |  |                              |  |                        |  | Frederick Warnaars     
|                         |  |  |  |                              |  |                        |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Aurelio Resource Corporation and will be retained by Aurelio
Resource Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 10.1 Policy.

It is the policy of the Department of Housing and Urban Development to provide for public participation in rulemaking with respect to all HUD programs and functions, including matters that relate to public property, loans, grants, benefits, or contracts even though such matters would not otherwise be subject to rulemaking by law or Executive policy. The Department therefore publishes notices of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register and gives interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rulemaking through submission of written data, views, and arguments with or without opportunity for oral presentation. It is the policy of the Department that its notices of proposed rulemaking are to afford the public not less than sixty days for submission of comments. For some rules the Secretary will employ additional methods of inviting public participation. These methods include, but are not limited to, publishing Advance Notices of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR), conducting public surveys, and convening public forums or panels. An ANPR will be used to solicit public comment early in the rulemaking process for significant rules unless the Secretary grants an exception based upon legitimate and pressing time constraints. Unless required by statute, notice and public procedure will be omitted if the Department determines in a particular case or class of cases that notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest. In a particular case, the reasons for the determination shall be stated in the rulemaking document. Notice and public procedure may also be omitted with respect to statements of policy, interpretative rules, rules governing the Department's organization or its own internal practices or procedures, or if a statute expressly so authorizes. A final substantive rule will be published not less than 30 days before its effective date, unless it grants or recognizes an exemption or relieves a restriction or unless the rule itself states good cause for taking effect upon publication or less than 30 days thereafter. Statements of policy and interpretative rules will usually be made effective on the date of publication.

[44 FR 1606, Jan. 5, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 56625, Dec. 20, 1982]
### **CHAPTER 32—MANAGEMENT OF VESSELS**

Sec.
3201.
Definitions.
3202.
Application.
3203.
Safety management system.
3204.
Implementation of safety management system.
3205.
Certification.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              Thinking Tools, Inc.
                             Financial Data Schedule
                       Commercial and Industrial Companies
                          Article 5 of Regulations S-X
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998 
<CASH>                                                1,552
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             7
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      1,663
<PP&E>                                                  396
<DEPRECIATION>                                          130
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        1,954
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   365
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  5
<OTHER-SE>                                             1588
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           1954
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          0
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           806
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (780)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (780)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (780)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.17)
        


</TABLE>
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Eberhard Kornotzki, the Chief Financial
Officer of LONGHAI STEEL INC. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1. The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement
this 8thday of April, 2011.

/s/ Eberhard
KornotzkiEberhard Kornotzki Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Longhai Steel Inc. and will be retained by Longhai
Steel Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DANIEL KULJIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-3009

[June 23, 2022]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Daniel Arthur Casey, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 08-019897-CF-10A.

Daniel Tibbitt of Daniel J. Tibbitt P.A., North Miami, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, CONNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### **CHAPTER 37—CARRIAGE OF LIQUID BULK DANGEROUS CARGOES**

Sec.
3701.
Definitions.
3702.
Application.
3703.
Regulations.
3703a.
Tank vessel construction standards.
3704.
Coastwise trade vessels.
3705.
Crude oil tanker minimum standards.
3706.
Product carrier minimum standards.
3707.
Tanker minimum standards.
3708.
Self-propelled tank vessel minimum standards.
3709.
Exemptions.
3710.
Evidence of compliance by vessels of the United States.
3711.
Evidence of compliance by foreign vessels.
3712.
Notification of noncompliance.
3713.
Prohibited acts.
3714.
Inspection and examination.
3715.
Lightering.
3716.
Tank washings.
3717.
Marine safety information system.
3718.
Penalties.
3719.
Reduction of oil spills from single hull non-self-propelled tank vessels.

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Chapter 37 consolidates the laws that are applicable to vessels that transport oil or hazardous material in bulk as cargo or cargo residue.

The history of Federal authority to carry out a tank vessel safety program begins with the enactment of the so-called Tank Vessel Act of 1936 which, as amended, is presently codified in section 391a of title 46, United States Code. The 1936 Act remained essentially the same until it was amended by the Ports and Waterways Safety Act of 1972. The 1972 amendment contained more specific standards for the protection of a tank vessel and its crew and added vessel standards to improve the quality of the marine environment. After a rash of tank vessel accidents during the latter part of 1976 and early 1977 within our territorial seas and in nearby coastal waters, there was an outpouring of public attention to the need to protect United States ports and waterways, for the safety of tank vessels, and for the protection of the marine environment. This led to the enactment of the Port and Tanker Safety Act of 1978, which provided broader and more extensive regulatory authority over areas already regulated and over many areas not previously regulated. It provided for improvements in the supervision and control of vessels of all types operating in the navigable waters of the United States, and in the safety of all tank vessels, foreign or domestic, that transport or transfer oil or hazardous cargoes in ports or places subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. The 1978 amendments also reflect, in part, certain tank vessel standards and requirements that have been accepted internationally, in particular those developed by the International Conference on Tanker Safety and Pollution Prevention held in London in February, 1978.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2006**—Pub. L. 109–304, §15(14), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1703, inserted "single hull" before "non-self-propelled" in item 3719.

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–324, title IX, §901(c), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3947, added item 3719.

**1990**—Pub. L. 101–380, title IV, §4115(c), Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 520, added item 3703a.