alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2934 

To authorize Federal payment to emergency ambulance and medical services 

providers for the cost of uncompensated care of aliens aided by the 

border patrol or other Federal immigration official. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 16, 2005 

Mr. FILNER (for himself, Mr. KOLBE, Mrs. DAVIS of California, and Mr. 

FLAKE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To authorize Federal payment to emergency ambulance and 

medical services providers for the cost of uncompensated 

care of aliens aided by the border patrol or other Federal 

immigration official. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pay for All Your Un5 documented Procedures (PAY UP!) Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•HR 2934 IH 

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZING FEDERAL PAYMENT TO EMERGENCY 

2 AMBULANCE AND MEDICAL SERVICES PRO3 VIDERS FOR THE COST OF UNCOMPENSATED 

4 CARE OF ALIENS AIDED BY THE BORDER PA5 TROL OR OTHER FEDERAL IMMIGRATION OF6 FICIAL. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—In the case described in sub8 section (b), the Secretary of Homeland Security shall, 

9 from amounts appropriated under subsection (c), provide 

10 payment to the hospital, health clinic, or other provider 

11 of the ambulance or other emergency services described 

12 in subsection (b) appropriate reimbursement for the costs 

13 of such emergency services, but only to the extent that 

14 such costs are not otherwise reimbursed through any Fed15 eral program and cannot be recovered from the alien or 

16 another person. 

17 (b) CASE OF INJURED ALIEN DESCRIBED.—A case 

18 described in this subsection is the case of an alien to whom 

19 a border patrol officer or other Federal immigration offi20 cial provides assistance in any form, directly or indirectly, 

21 in seeking or obtaining emergency medical assistance, in22 cluding contacting an ambulance service for the transport 

23 of the alien to an appropriate medical facility for the re24 ceipt of emergency services. 

25 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

26 are authorized to be appropriated for each fiscal year, be-
3 

•HR 2934 IH 

1 ginning with fiscal year 2006, such sums as may be nec2 essary to carry out this section. 

Æ
President Lars Lindgren Vice Presidents Alexander Kirchner Ekaterina Yordanova General Secretary Eduardo Chagas Brussels, May 2 3 , 2014

The Honorable Anthony Foxx Secretary US Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave SE Washington, DC 20590

RE: Norwegian Air International Limited

- Foreign Permit/Exemption

- U.S.

- EU Open Skies, DOT

- OST

2013

- 0204

Dear Secretary Foxx,

On behalf of more than 2.5 million workers of the European Transport Workers’ Federation (EFT), representing 243 transport unions and 41 European countries, I would like to bring to your attention a
resolution which was adopted at an April meeting of the International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF) calling for a full investigation of Norwegian Air International’s (NAI) labor standards and business practices. The resolution calls upon the U.S. Department of Trans portation, among others, to seek additional information about NAI’s plans in order to protect airline labor from the adverse consequences of circumventing international labor laws. I have attached a copy of this resolution for your records.

Additionally, I would like to point out that labor representatives are not alone in our concerns. Ketil
Slovik

- Olsen from the Royal Norwegian Ministry of Transport and Communications recently raised his concern to the European Commission about the challenges facing Eur opean aviation that are created by fragmented operations between multiple countries.

In its response to Minister Solvik

- Olsen, the European Commission proposed further discussions at a June 2014 Member States Marek Access Committee meeting.

The Europea n Commission continues to discuss and evaluate whether disparities in immigration rules of the Member States pave the way for labor standards in global aviation that are founded on the lowest common denominators. Given these very serious and as

- yet unresol ved issues that pertain directly to the NAI application, I urge the Department either to deny NAI’s application outright or defer action until questions pertaining to labor standards are thoroughly and properly addressed by all concerned
stakeholders

.

Respectfully,

Eduardo Chagas General Secretary

enclosures

cc: DOT

- OST

- 2013

- 0204

- 0002 Galerie Agora, Rue du Marché aux Herbes 105, Bte 11 B

- 1000 Brussels Telephone +32 2 285 46 60 Fax +32 2 280 08 17 Email: etf@etf

- europe.org www.etf

- europe.org European Transport Workers’ Federation Fédération Européenne des Travailleurs des Transports Europäische Transportarbeiter

- Föderation Federación Europea de los Trabajadores del Transporte
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Don K. Avni a/k/a Don Avni Kaminetzky v. David A. Newman

Appellate case number: 01-13-00863-CV

Trial court case number: 2010-22875

Trial court: 333rd District Court of Harris County

On December 27, 2013, appellant, David A. Newman, filed a motion to “consolidate 

herewith the record of prior appeal #01-10-01113-CV,” to “extend time to file 1.3.14 1st 

supplemental record ordered 11/7/13 and completed on 11/19/13 – but still unpaid for to[]date by 

appellee,” and to “extend time to file appellant’s brief by February 3,[] 2014.” We address 

appellant’s three separate requests in this order.

First, appellant seeks to consolidate the record from a prior appeal (cause no. 01-10-

01113-CV) with the record in the present appeal in order to avoid “duplication” of expenditures. 

The Court issued an opinion in cause no. 01-10-01113-CV on December 29, 2011. Appellant 

cites no authority to support his argument that the records should be consolidated nor provides an 

explanation as to why the record in cause no. 01-10-01113-CV is necessary for this appeal. 

Further, the record in the current appeal has already been filed. Accordingly, we DENY

appellant’s motion to consolidate records.

In regards to appellant’s motion to extend time to file “1st supplemental record,”

appellant does not specify the documents sought to be included in the supplemental clerk’s 

record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(b)(2) (“A party requesting that an item be included in the 

clerk’s record must specifically describe the item so that the clerk can readily identify it.”). 

Additionally, appellant’s motion for extension fails to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 10.5(b). See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b) (governing motions for extension). Thus, we 

DENY appellant’s motion. Further, to the extent that appellant’s motion seeks an extension in 

order to file documents contained in the supplemental clerk’s record filed with this Court on 

January 3, 2014, we dismiss the request as moot.

With respect to appellant’s motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief, appellant 

requests the due date for his brief be extended until February 3, 2014. Appellant’s brief was due 

December 9, 2013. Appellant has provided no explanation for the need for an extension in his 

motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b)(1)(C) (requiring moving party to state facts relied on to 

reasonably explain need for extension). Accordingly, we DENY appellant’s motion for 
extension to file appellant’s brief for failing to provide any explanation of the need for an 

extension. See id. 

Further, we ORDER appellant to file his brief, or a proper motion for extension of time 

providing a reasonable explanation of the need for an extension, no later than 10 days from the 

date of this order, or appellant’s appeal may be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b), 38.6(d), 

38.8(a), 42.3(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: January 9, 2014
###### Editorial Note on Part 713

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 713 appear at 84 FR 37752, Aug. 2, 2019.

#### § 713.6 Where should I send my request?

Send your request or subpoena for records or testimony to the attention of the Vice-President/General Counsel, DFC, 1100 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20527.
### §706. Bills and resolutions: number and distribution

There shall be printed of each Senate and House public bill and joint resolution six hundred and twenty-five copies, which shall be distributed as follows:

to the Senate document room, two hundred and twenty-five copies;

to the office of Secretary of Senate, fifteen copies;

to the House document room, three hundred and eighty-five copies.

There shall be printed of each Senate private bill, when introduced, when reported, and when passed, three hundred copies, which shall be distributed as follows:

to the Senate document room, one hundred and seventy copies;

to the Secretary of the Senate, fifteen copies;

to the House document room, one hundred copies;

to the Superintendent of Documents, ten copies.

There shall be printed of each House private bill, when introduced, when reported, and when passed two hundred and sixty copies, which shall be distributed as follows:

to the Senate document room, one hundred and thirty-five copies;

to the Secretary of the Senate, fifteen copies;

to the House document room, one hundred copies;

to the Superintendent of Documents, ten copies.

Bills and resolutions shall be printed in bill form, and, unless specially ordered by either House shall be printed only when referred to a committee, when favorably reported back, and after their passage by either House.

Of concurrent and simple resolutions, when reported, and after their passage by either House, only two hundred and sixty copies shall be printed, except by special order, and shall be distributed as follows:

to the Senate document room, one hundred and thirty-five copies;

to the Secretary of the Senate, fifteen copies;

to the House document room, one hundred copies;

to the Superintendent of Documents, ten copies.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1248.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §189 (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §55, 28 Stat. 609; Jan. 20, 1905, ch. 50, §2, 33 Stat. 611).
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF MISCOR GROUP, LTD. PURSUANT

TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MISCOR Group, Ltd. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, hereby certified, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 19, 2013



|                  |  |                              
|----------------- |  | -----------------------------
|/s/ Marc Valentin
|Name:             |  | Marc Valentin, CPA, CGMA     
|Title:            |  | Chief Accounting Officer     
|                  |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****Light list. Vol. VI, Pacific Coast andPacific Islands, Pacific Coast and outlying Pacific Islands.
 
2003 | 2004| 2005 | 2006| 2007 | 2009
2010 | 2011| 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016| 2017 | 2018 | 2019
2020 | 2021
 
SuDoc Number:HS 7.22:V.6/
Item Number:0520-L-06 (online)
CGP System Number:000609079
 
 
 
** 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
August 7, 2017********
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Annual Report of Western Exploration Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Peter Banysch, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Peter Banysch
--------------------------
Peter Banysch
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer

March 25, 2005
§ 583.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *General.* The Supportive Housing Program is authorized by title IV of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act (the McKinney Act) (42 U.S.C. 11381-11389). The Supportive Housing program is designed to promote the development of supportive housing and supportive services, including innovative approaches to assist homeless persons in the transition from homelessness, and to promote the provision of supportive housing to homeless persons to enable them to live as independently as possible.
( b ) *Components.* Funds under this part may be used for: ( 1 ) Transitional housing to facilitate the movement of homeless individuals and families to permanent housing;
( 2 ) Permanent housing that provides long-term housing for homeless persons with disabilities;
( 3 ) Housing that is, or is part of, a particularly innovative project for, or alternative methods of, meeting the immediate and long-term needs of homeless persons; or
( 4 ) Supportive services for homeless persons not provided in conjunction with supportive housing.
[58 FR 13871, Mar. 15, 1993, as amended at 61 FR 51175, Sept. 30, 1996]
#### In the Matter of the Claim of John R. Hilliard, Respondent, against Armour & Company, Appellant. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

The name of Irving B. Stern is stricken from the appearances noted on the record. Only lawyers may appear for parties in this court. Workmen’s compensation representatives who are not lawyers are without right to appear. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
#### § 902.68 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 99.1
   
  One Bryant Park
  4th Floor  Structured Credit Trading
  New York, New York 10036
  The  undersigned, Terrence White, Vice President of The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly The Bank of New York), a New
    York     corporation (the Trustee), hereby certifies in such capacity that, based on his knowledge, the Trustee
    has     complied, in all material respects, with all conditions and covenants applicable to the Trustee under the Standard
    Terms for     Trust Agreements dated February 20, 1998 between MERRILL LYNCH DEPOSITOR, INC., as depositor (the
    Depositor) and     the Trustee, as successor to United States Trust Company of New York, as trustee and
    securities intermediary     (the Securities Intermediary), in each case  as amended by a series supplement between
    the Depositor, the Trustee     and the Securities Intermediary for each trust series listed in the attached schedule.


Very truly yours,
The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly

        The Bank of New York), as TrusteeBy:
      /s/
      Terrence WhiteName:
      Terrence WhiteTitle:
      Vice President


---










---
Served: December 3, 2013 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department ofTransportation on the 3rd ofDecember, 2013 Essential Air Service at DODGE CITY, KANSAS GARDEN CITY, KANSAS GREAT BEND, KANSAS HAYS, KANSAS LIBERAL, KANSAS Under 49 U.S.C. 41731 

### etseq. DOCKET DOT-OST-1998-3502 DOCKET DOT-OST-1998-3503 DOCKET DOT-OST-1998-3496 DOCKET DOT-OST-1998-3497 DOCKET DOT-OST-1998-3498

NOTICE EXTENDING THE DEADLINE FOR PROPOSALS AT DODGE CITY, GARDEN CITY, GREAT BEND, HAYS, AND LIBERAL, KANSAS By Order 2013-11-2, November 1, 2013, the Department requested proposals for EAS at the five communities in Kansas above, withproposals due no later than December 2. On December 2, SkyWest Airlines requested a one-week extension to that deadline. We will grant the extension request. Proposals at Dodge City, Garden City, Great Bend, Hays, and Liberal, Kansas, are now due on December 9, 2013.**--K.e~in** D. Schlemmer, Chief EAS and Domestic Analysis

· An electronic version ofthis document is available on the World Wide Web at http:/ /www.regulations.gov
#### Maria Feher v. City of New York.

Motion for leave to dispense with printing denied. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Yalente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
#### Universal Vending Service Company, appellee, v. Speros Notos, appellant.

Gen. No. 28,579.

Consolidated with No. 28,578 ante. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Henry M. Walker, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed November 27, 1923.

Per Curiam.
69–008 

110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 110–447 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY THE BILL (H.R 3074) MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENTS OF TRANSPORTATION, AND HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2008, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES 

NOVEMBER 13, 2007.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. ARCURI, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 817] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 817, by a non-record vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference 

report on H.R. 3074, Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2008, and against 

its consideration and provides that the conference report shall be 

considered as read. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against the conference report 

and against its consideration includes a waiver of clause 8 of rule 

XXII (requiring a three-day layover of conference reports and the 

accompanying joint explanatory statement). Although the rule 

waives all points of order against the conference report and against 

its consideration, the conference report does not violate either 

House Resolution 491 or clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI (requiring earmarks to be disclosed in the conference report and requiring conference reports to be in compliance with the PAYGO rule). 

Æ 


cnoel on PROD1PC69 with REPORTS
1

Ngo, Dan (FAA)

From: Ngo, Dan (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2016 1:48 PM

To: 'Lindsey@Skylinetowerpainting.com'

Subject: Petition for Exemption - FAA-2015-7697

Ms. Mandolesi, 

Thank you for our call this afternoon. Per your request, your petition has been closed and you can operate in 

accordance with part 107, which went into effect on August 29, 2016. 

Section 333 of Public Law 112-95, Special Rules for Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS), provided the 

FAA authority to authorize certain UAS operations. This incremental step provided a pathway for safe and legal 

civil operations in the National Airspace System (NAS) and was considered a bridge mechanism until the 

implementation of part 107. 

Part 107 represents a new pathway to UAS operations, and provides additional flexibility compared to the 

Conditions and Limitations of Section 333 exemptions that the FAA has been granting to date. For example, 

rather than obtaining a part 61 airmen certificate, UAS operators may simply pass a knowledge test to obtain a 

Remote Pilot Certificate. I encourage you to review part 107 and our website below for more information. 

Study materials for the written knowledge test can be found at 

http://www.faa.gov/uas/getting_started/fly_for_work_business/becoming_a_pilot. 

For more information, please visit: http://www.faa.gov/uas/ or contact us via email at UAShelp@faa.gov or call 

844-FLY-MY-UAS. 

Regards, 

Dan Ngo 

Office of Rulemaking, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division 

Federal Aviation Administration
### §931c. Permits, leases, or easements; authorization to grant; payment; limitation

The head of any department or agency of the Government of the United States having jurisdiction over public lands and national forests, except national parks and monuments, of the United States is authorized to grant permits, leases, or easements, in return for the payment of a price representing the fair market value of such permit, lease, or easement, to be fixed by such head of such department or agency through appraisal, for a period not to exceed thirty years from the date of any such permit, lease, or easement to States, counties, cities, towns, townships, municipal corporations, or other public agencies for the purpose of constructing and maintaining on such lands public buildings or other public works. In the event such lands cease to be used for the purpose for which such permit, lease, or easement was granted, the same shall thereupon terminate.

(Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1255, §1, 68 Stat. 1146.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeal; Savings Provision

Section repealed by Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §706(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2793, effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976, insofar as applicable to the issuance of rights-of-way over, upon, under, and through the public lands and lands in the National Forest System. Such repeal not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.

#### Existing Rights-of-Way

Provisions of section 706(a) of Pub. L. 94–579, except as pertaining to rights-of-way, not to be construed as affecting the authority of the Secretary of Agriculture under this section, see section 706(b) of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.