alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 8, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 79016]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26952]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than December 23, 2020.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Chris P. Wangen, Assistant 
Vice President), 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:
    1. Brian Kenneth Solsrud, North Oaks, Minnesota; to acquire 
additional voting shares of Belt Valley Bank, Belt, Montana.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 3, 
2020.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2020-26952 Filed 12-7-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
### §1430. Annual report to Congress

#### (a) In general

Not later than 1 year after February 22, 2012, and each year thereafter, the First Responder Network Authority shall submit an annual report covering the preceding fiscal year to the appropriate committees of Congress.

#### (b) Required content

The report required under subsection (a) shall include—

(1) a comprehensive and detailed report of the operations, activities, financial condition, and accomplishments of the First Responder Network Authority under this section; and

(2) such recommendations or proposals for legislative or administrative action as the First Responder Network Authority deems appropriate.

#### (c) Availability to testify

The members of the Board and employees of the First Responder Network Authority shall be available to testify before the appropriate committees of the Congress with respect to—

(1) the report required under subsection (a);

(2) the report of any audit conducted under section 1429 1 of this title; or

(3) any other matter which such committees may determine appropriate.

(Pub. L. 112–96, title VI, §6210, Feb. 22, 2012, 126 Stat. 217.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1429 of this title, referred to in subsec. (c)(2), was in the original a reference to section 6210 of Pub. L. 112–96, this section, and was translated as if it had been a reference to section 6209 of Pub. L. 112–96, which is classified to section 1429 of this title, to reflect the probable intent of Congress. Section 6210 does not relate to audits.

1 See References in Text note below.
[Proposed] Order Granting Stipulation To Continue CMC 

 (Case No. CV 09 2192 MMC) 

300089106.1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

COLONIAL MEDICAL GROUP, INC., a 

California corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE WEST, a 

California Not-For-Profit corporation dba 

MERCY HOSPITAL; GOLDEN EMPIRE 

MANAGEMENT CARE, A MEDICAL 

GROUP, INC., a California corporation; and 

MANAGED CARE SYSTEMS, LP, 

Defendants. 

 Case No.: CV 09 2192 MMC 

Complaint Filed: May 19, 2009 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND 

RELATED REQUIREMENTS, 

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16-2

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing thereon, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that the Case Management Conference shall be continued to June 25, 2010, with all 

other requirements of Local Rule 16-2 to be met timely with regards to the continued date. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _______________, 2010 

Hon. Maxine M. Chesney 

United States District Court Judge 

April 26

Case 3:09-cv-02192-MMC Document 54 Filed 04/26/10 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the
      Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment
      Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
      of
      Directors of the Company, certifies that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      David
      Lichtenstein


David
      Lichtenstein


Chairman,
      President, and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)


May
      8,
      2006
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3318

To amend the Clayton Act to restore the application of the antitrust laws 

to rail carriers; and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 18, 2005

Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin (for himself and Mr. POMEROY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and 

in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for 

a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To amend the Clayton Act to restore the application of 

the antitrust laws to rail carriers; and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘Railroad Antitrust and 

5 Competition Enhancement Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE CLAYTON ACT. 

7 The Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 21(a)) is amended—
2

•HR 3318 IH 

1 (1) in section 11(a) by inserting ‘‘(excluding 

2 part A)’’ after ‘‘subtitle IV’’, and 

3 (2) in the proviso to the 1st sentence of section 

4 16 by inserting ‘‘(excluding a railroad)’’ after ‘‘com5 mon carrier’’. 

6 SEC. 3. RELATED AMENDMENTS. 

7 (a) REGIONAL RAIL REORGANIZATION ACT OF

8 1973.—Section 601 of the Regional Rail Reorganization 

9 Act of 1973 (45 U.S.C. 791) is amended by striking sub10 section (a). 

11 (b) TITLE 49 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE.—Title 

12 49 of the United States Code is amended—

13 (1) in section 333(d)—

14 (A) by striking paragraph (2), and 

15 (B) by striking ‘‘(1)’’, 

16 (2) in section 10706 in the 3d sentence—

17 (A) in the heading by striking ‘‘: EXEMP18 TION FROM ANTITRUST LAWS’’, 

19 (B) in subsection (a)(5)(A) by striking 

20 ‘‘and the antitrust laws set forth in paragraph 

21 (2) of this subsection do not apply to parties 

22 and other persons with respect to making or 

23 carrying out the agreement’’ and inserting ‘‘ex24 cept that the antitrust laws set forth in para25 graph (2) of this subsection shall apply to par-
3

•HR 3318 IH 

1 ties and other persons with respect to making 

2 or carrying out the agreement’’, and 

3 (C) by striking subsections (d) and (e), 

4 (3) in section 11321(a) in the 3d sentence—

5 (A) by striking ‘‘from the antitrust laws 

6 and’’, and 

7 (B) by inserting ‘‘(excluding the antitrust 

8 laws)’’ after ‘‘other law’’, and 

9 (4) in section 14302(f) in the 2d sentence—

10 (A) by striking ‘‘from the antitrust laws 

11 and’’, and 

12 (B) by inserting ‘‘(excluding the antitrust 

13 laws)’’ after ‘‘other law’’.

Æ
Order entered August 2 7 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00790
- CR JEREMY WAYNE MILLS, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F17
- 72093
- U



### O RDER
T he reporter’s record was due June 21, 2019. When it was not filed, we notified court reporter Sasha Brooks by postcard dated July 3, 2019 and directed her to file the reporter’s record by August 2, 2019. To date, the reporter’s record has not been filed and we have had no
communication from Ms. Brooks.
We ORDER the complete reporter’s record filed BY SEPTEMBER 27 , 201 9 . We caution Ms. Brooks that the failure to file t he reporter’s record by that date will result in the Court taking whatever remedies it has available to ensure that the appeal proceeds in a timely fashion, which may include ordering that she not sit until the complete reporter’s record is filed.We DIREC T the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Stephanie Mitchell,

Presiding Judge, 291st Judicial District Court; Sasha Brooks, official court reporter, 291st Judicial District Court; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JU STICE
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 131641 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 131641 

 COA: 269742 

Saginaw CC: 05-025477-FH 

BRANDI MICHELE PEAPHON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 30, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Danny GOMEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-10740

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 18, 2007.

Chad Eugene Meacham, U.S. Attorney’s Office Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Thomas Warren Lively, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Danny Gomez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Gomez has not filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### § 906.17 PHA handling of homeownership applications.

Families who are interested in purchasing a unit must submit applications to the PHA or PRE for that specific purpose, and those applications must be handled separately from applications for other PHA programs. Application for homeownership must not affect an applicant's place on any other PHA waiting list for rental units.
### §58104. Willful violation constitutes breach of contract or charter

A willful violation of any provision of sections 58101–58103 of this title constitutes a breach of the contract or charter. On determining that a violation has occurred, the Secretary of Transportation may declare the contract or charter rescinded.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1672.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 58104 | 46 App.:1223(f). | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title VIII, §805(f), 49 Stat. 2014; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(122), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 164. |

Section

The words "in force under this chapter" and "forthwith" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "and any person willfully violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor" are omitted because section 3559 of title 18 provides for the classification of offenses. See the revision notes for section 58109 of the revised title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      22,211,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,513,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                   444,000
<INVENTORY>                                 14,059,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            52,196,300
<PP&E>                                       2,999,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                 799,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              66,364,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,094,600
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        83,300
<OTHER-SE>                                  51,839,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                66,364,500
<SALES>                                     21,091,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,091,000
<CGS>                                       15,373,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,142,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               149,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                45,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             157,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,799,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                   664,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,134,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,134,900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of Illinois, defendant in error, v. Luis Brito, plaintiff in error.

Gen. No. 29,079.

Charge of encouraging delinquency of girl 17 years old, enticing her from home and having sexual intercourse with her. Verdict of guilty. Sentenced to house of correction for one year and fined. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Francis Borrelli, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1923.

Reversed.

Opinion filed December 7, 1923.

Louis J. Du Roeher, for plaintiff in error; Walter T. Quigley and' D. L. Marcuelo, of counsel. Robert E. Crowe, State’s Attorney, Edward E. Wilson and Clyde C. Fisher, Assistant State’s Attorneys, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Barnes

delivered -(¡he opinion of the court.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 22, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 83450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27021]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

39 CFR Part 20


International Mailing Services: Mailing Services Product and 
Price Changes

AGENCY: Postal Service\TM\.

ACTION: Final action.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On October 15, 2020, the Postal Service published proposed 
product and price changes to reflect a notice of price adjustments 
filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission (PRC). The PRC found that 
price adjustments contained in the Postal Service's notification may go 
into effect on January 24, 2021. The Postal Service will revise Notice 
123, Price List to reflect the new prices.

DATES: The revisions to Notice 123, Price List, are effective January 
24, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Frigo at 202-268-4178.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Proposed Rule and Response

    On October 9, 2020, the Postal Service filed a notice with the PRC 
in Docket Number R2021-1 of mailing services price adjustments to be 
effective on January 24, 2021. On October 15, 2020, USPS[supreg] 
published a notification of proposed product and price changes in the 
Federal Register entitled ``International Mailing Services: Proposed 
Product and Price Changes--CPI'' (85 FR 65310). The notification 
included price changes that the Postal Service would adopt for products 
and services covered by Mailing Standards of the United States Postal 
Service, International Mail Manual (IMM[supreg]) and publish in Notice 
123, Price List, on Postal Explorer[supreg] at pe.usps.com. The Postal 
Service received no comments.

II. Decision of the Postal Regulatory Commission

    As stated in the PRC's Order No. 5757, issued on November 18, 2020, 
in PRC Docket No. R2021-1, the PRC found that the prices in the Postal 
Service's notification may go into effect on January 24, 2021. The new 
prices will accordingly be posted in Notice 123, Price List on Postal 
Explorer at pe.usps.com.

Joshua J. Hofer,
Attorney, Federal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020-27021 Filed 12-21-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
§ 93.402 Program disbursement and information system. ( a ) *General.* The HTF Treasury account is managed through a computerized disbursement and information system established by HUD. The system disburses HTF funds that are allocated or reallocated, and collects and reports information on the use of funds in the HTF Treasury account. The grantee must report on the receipt and use of all program income in HUD's computerized disbursement and information system. The grantee must develop and maintain a system to ensure that each recipient and subgrantee uses HTF funds in accordance with the requirements of this part and that any requirements or conditions under which the HTF funds were provided.
( b ) *Project set-up.* ( 1 ) After the grantee executes the HTF grant agreement, submits the applicable banking and security documents, and commits funds to a specific local project, the grantee shall identify (set up) specific activities (*i.e.,* projects) in the disbursement and information system. Investments that require the set-up of projects in the system are the acquisition, new construction, or rehabilitation of housing, operating cost assistance, and operating cost assistance reserves. The grantee is required to enter complete project set-up information at the time of project set-up.
( 2 ) If the project set-up information is not completed within 20 calendar days of the date of the initial project set-up, the project may be canceled by the system. In addition, a project that has been committed in the system for 12 months without an initial disbursement of funds may be canceled by the system.
( c ) *Disbursement of HTF Funds.* ( 1 ) After complete project set-up information is entered into the disbursement and information system, HTF funds for the project may be drawn down from the HTF Treasury account by the grantee by electronic funds transfer. Any drawdown of funds in the HTF Treasury account is conditioned upon the provision of satisfactory information by the grantee about the project and compliance with other procedures, as specified by HUD.
( 2 ) Funds drawn from the HTF Treasury account are subject to the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act (31 U.S.C. 6501 *et seq.*) and regulations at 31 CFR part 205.
( 3 ) Funds in the HTF local account must be disbursed before requests are made for funds in the HTF Treasury account.
( d ) *Project completion.* ( 1 ) Complete project completion information must be entered into the disbursement and information system, or otherwise provided, within 120 calendar days of the date of the final project drawdown. If satisfactory project completion information is not provided, HUD may suspend further project set-ups or take other corrective actions.
( 2 ) Additional HTF funds for development-related costs may be committed to a project up to one year after project completion, but the amount of HTF funds in the project may not exceed the maximum per-unit development subsidy amount established pursuant to § 93.300.
( e ) *Access by other participants.* Access to the disbursement and information system by other entities participating in the HTF program will be governed by procedures established by HUD.