alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rosemary Davis, Appellant.

[835 NYS2d 784]

Appeal from a judgment of the Oneida County Court (Michael L. Dwyer, J.), rendered January 11, 2005. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of manslaughter in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her upon a jury verdict of manslaughter in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.15 [1]) arising from the death of the 22-month-old victim, defendant’s foster child. The victim had sustained severe burns, and defendant failed to obtain medical treatment for the victim when the burns became infected, resulting in the victim’s death. We reject defendant’s contention that County Court erred in admitting autopsy photographs of the victim in *1242evidence. “The general rule is . . . [that] photographs are admissible if they tend ‘to prove or disprove a disputed or mater rial issue, to illustrate or elucidate other relevant evidence, or to corroborate or disprove some other evidence offered or to be offered.’ They should be excluded ‘only if [their] *sole purpose*is to arouse the emotions of the jury and to prejudice the defendant’ ” *(People v Wood,*79 NY2d 958, 960 [1992]; *see People v Pobliner,*32 NY2d 356, 369-370 [1973], *rearg denied*33 NY2d 657 [1973], *cert denied*416 US 905 [1974]). Here, the photographs were probative of the serious nature of the injuries sustained by the victim and the fact that her wounds were visibly infected, and they established that the victim required immediate medical care. The photographs thus were admissible to establish defendant’s awareness of the risk that the victim would die without prompt medical care. Contrary to the further contention of defendant, “[t]he People were not bound to rely entirely on the testimony of the medical expert to prove this point and the photographs were admissible to elucidate and corroborate that testimony” *(People v Stevens,*76 NY2d 833, 836 [1990]).

Contrary to defendant’s further contentions, the conviction is supported by legally sufficient evidence and the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence *(see generally People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Finally, we note that the record of conviction incorrectly reflects that defendant was convicted of manslaughter in the second degree under Penal Law § 125.10 (1), and it must therefore be amended to reflect that she was convicted under Penal Law § 125.15 (1) *(see People v Saxton,*32 AD3d 1286 [2006]; *People v Benson,*265 AD2d 814, 816 [1999], *lv denied*94 NY2d 860 [1999], *cert denied*529 US 1076 [2000]). Present— Hurlbutt, J.P., Gorski, Smith, Fahey and Green, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS  SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOUND  IN THE COMPANY'S  FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN  ITS ENTIRETY
BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000

<S>
<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                              49,356
<SECURITIES>                        233,111
<RECEIVABLES>                       224,845
<ALLOWANCES>                        34
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    0
<PP&E>                              34,395
<DEPRECIATION>                      13,622
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      558,474
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               0
<BONDS>                             149,498
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<COMMON>                            160
<OTHER-SE>                          148,807
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        558,474
<SALES>                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    35,945
<CGS>                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    24,474
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    543
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  7,803
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     3,125
<INCOME-TAX>                        1,299
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 1,826
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                        1,826
<EPS-BASIC>                       0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0.11


</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of FalconTarget, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the undersigned’s knowledge: 

(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; 

and 

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  

FalconTarget, Inc.

Date: September 8, 2005 

By:   /s/   Thomas Kirchner 

    Thomas Kirchner

    Chief Executive Officer 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3236 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain mixtures of florasulam. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 12, 2005 

Mr. BUYER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain mixtures of 

florasulam. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MIXTURES OF FLORASULAM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.88 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 florasulam and application adjuvants) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘Free’’ and inserting ‘‘1.5%’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 
2 

•HR 3236 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
### Summary of percentages of zero daily mean streamflow for 712 U.S. Geological Survey streamflow-gaging stations in Texas through 2003

By: William H. Asquith**Joseph Vrabel**Meghan C. Roussel

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds247

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Analysts and managers of surface-water resources might have interest in the zero-flow potential for U.S.Geological Survey (USGS) streamflow-gaging stations in Texas. The USGS, in cooperation with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, initiated a data and reporting process to generate summaries of percentages of zero daily mean streamflow for 712 USGS streamflow-gaging stations in Texas. A summary of the percentages of zero daily mean streamflow for most active and inactive, continuous-record gaging stations in Texas provides valuable information by conveying the historical perspective for zero-flow potential for the watershed. The summaries of percentages of zero daily mean streamflow for each station are graphically depicted using two thematic perspectives: annual and monthly. The annual perspective consists of graphs of annual percentages of zero streamflow by year with the addition of lines depicting the mean and median annual percentage of zero streamflow. Monotonic trends in the percentages of zero streamflow also are identified using Kendall's T. The monthly perspective consists of graphs of the percentage of zero streamflow by month with lines added to indicate the mean and median monthly percentage of zero streamflow. One or more summaries could be used in a watershed, river basin, or other regional context by analysts and managers of surface-water resources to guide scientific, regulatory, or other inquiries of zero-flow or other low-flow conditions in Texas.

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
EX-10.3


  Exhibit 10.3

   

  AMENDMENT TO THE

  CRINETICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 2021 EMPLOYMENT INDUCEMENT INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN

   

  THIS AMENDMENT TO the CRINETICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 2021 EMPLOYMENT INDUCEMENT INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN (this “Amendment”), effective as of September 9, 2022, is made and adopted by Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”).  Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan (as defined below).

  RECITALS

  WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2021 Employment Inducement Incentive Award Plan (as amended from time to time, the “Plan”); 

  WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10.4 of the Plan, the Plan may be amended by the Administrator of the Plan at any time;

  WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) is the Administrator of the Plan;

   WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3.1 of the Plan, the Board may re-vest administrative authority over the Plan to itself at any time;

  WHEREAS, the Board has re-vested itself administrative authority over the Plan solely with respect to and for purposes of approving this Amendment and, pursuant to such authority, adopted and approved this Amendment.

  NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Company hereby amends the Plan as follows:

  1.Section 11.28 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


  “11.28	‘Overall Share Limit’ means 3,000,000 Shares.”

  2.This Amendment shall be and is hereby incorporated in and forms a part of the Plan.  


  3.Except as expressly provided herein, all other terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.  


   

  

  	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereby certify that this Amendment was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on September 9, 2022.

   

   

  Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.			

   

  By: /s/ Garlan Adams   

  Garlan Adams

  General Counsel

   

  Date: September 11, 2022
Exhibit 10.8





INTREORG SYSTEMS, INC.


2600 E. Southlake Boulevard


Suite 120-366


Southlake, Texas 76092











April 4, 2011





J.H. Brech, LLC


2600 E. Southlake Boulevard


Suite 120-366


Southlake, TX  76092





Re:
Commercial Convertible Promissory Note dated April 10, 2009 in the principal amount of $406,960.90 (the “April 10, 2009 Note”) and the Commercial Convertible Promissory Note dated April 21, 2009 in the principal amount of $34,400 (the “April 21, 2009 Note”), each such note from INTREorg Systems, Inc. to J.H. Brech, LLC (collectively, the “Notes”)





Ladies and Gentlemen:





This letter will serve to confirm our agreement that the Maturity Date of the April 10, 2009 Note is extended from April 10, 2011 to April 10, 2012 and the Maturity Date of the April 21, 2009 Note is extended from April 21, 2011 to April 21, 2012.  Other than these extensions, all other terms and conditions of the Notes remain in full force and effect.





To confirm your agreement to the foregoing, please countersign this letter in the space provided below.





Sincerely,











Kirk Boyd


President





The foregoing is acknowledged and agreed to


as of the day and date first above written.





J.H. Brech, LLC





By: _______________________________


Its: _________________________
Exhibit 4.35

Supplementary Agreement

Party A: The9 Computer Technology Consulting (Shanghai) Co., Limited (The9
Computer)

Registered Address: Room 22301-601, Building 14, No.498, Guo Shou Jing Road, Zhang Jiang Hi-tech Park, Pu Dong New Area, Shanghai

Party B: Zhu Jun

ID Number: 310103661007241

Party C: Wang Yong

ID Number: 310108196704101616

Whereas:



|1) | The9 Computer, Qin Jie and Zhu Jun have executed three Loan Agreements respectively on January 1, 2004, July 19, 2004, and May 1, 2005 (collectively Loan
Agreements), and according to these Loan Agreements, The9 Computer has provided a loan of RMB 14,720,000 to Zhu Jun and another loan of RMB 8,280,000 to Qin Jie; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | On August 14, 2006, Qin Jie entered into Wang Yong a Share Transfer Agreement and Novation Agreement whereby Qin Jie transferred inter alia all his rights and obligations under
the Loan Agreements to Wang Yong.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The9 Computer, Zhu Jun and Wang Yong, through friendly negotiation have agreed to the following
supplemental provisions in respect of use of the loans provided under the Loan Agreements:



|1 | Zhu Jun and Wang Yong hereby covenant that all the loans they received under the Loan Agreements have been invested in Shanghai The9 Information Technology Co., Limited.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2 | This Supplementary Agreement shall constitute an integral part of the Loan Agreements and have the same legal effect that the Loan Agreements have.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Supplementary Agreement shall become effective upon the execution by all the parties hereto.

Party A: The9 Computer Technology Consulting (Shanghai) Co., Limited (The9 Computer)



|      |  |                          
|----- |  | -------------------------
|Seal: |  | [sealed by The9 Computer]

Party B: Zhu Jun



|           |  |            
|---------- |  | -----------
|Signature: |  | /s/ Zhu Jun

Party C: Wang Yong



|           |  |              
|---------- |  | -------------
|Signature: |  | /s/ Wang Yong
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**SENECA GAMING CORPORATION**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CORPORATE OFFICERS**

 

(Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Seneca Gaming Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission, we, E. Brian Hansberry, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer, and David Sheridan, Chief Financial Officer,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       TheAnnual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company asof, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K.

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsStaff upon request.

 
| December 29, 2008                                                |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                  |   |
| /s/ E. Brian Hansberry                                                |   |
| E. Brian Hansberry                                                    |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal  Executive Officer)  |
|                                                                  |   |
|                                                                  |   |
| /s/ David Sheridan                                                    |   |
| David Sheridan                                                        |   |
| Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and  Accounting Officer) |

 

Theforgoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Kpursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not beingfiled as part of the Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
#### GUINAN, Respondent, v. KOCH, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

November 11, 1903.)

Action by John S. Guinan against William Koch.

No opinion. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Editorial Note on Part 982
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999, and at 89 FR 38293, May 7, 2024.

§ 982.636 Homeownership option: Portability. ( a ) *General.* A family may qualify to move outside the initial PHA jurisdiction with continued homeownership assistance under the voucher program in accordance with this section.
( b ) *Portability of homeownership assistance.* Subject to § 982.353(b) and (c), § 982.552, and § 982.553, a family determined eligible for homeownership assistance by the initial PHA may purchase a unit outside of the initial PHA's jurisdiction, if the receiving PHA is administering a voucher homeownership program and is accepting new homeownership families.
( c ) *Applicability of Housing Choice Voucher program portability procedures.* In general, the portability procedures described in §§ 982.353 and 982.355 apply to the homeownership option and the administrative responsibilities of the initial and receiving PHA are not altered except that some administrative functions (e.g., issuance of a voucher or execution of a tenancy addendum) do not apply to the homeownership option.
( d ) *Family and PHA responsibilities.* The family must attend the briefing and counseling sessions required by the receiving PHA. The receiving PHA will determine whether the financing for, and the physical condition of the unit, are acceptable. The receiving PHA must promptly notify the initial PHA if the family has purchased an eligible unit under the program, or if the family is unable to purchase a home within the maximum time established by the PHA.
( e ) *Continued assistance under § 982.637 .* Such continued assistance under portability procedures is subject to § 982.637.
[65 FR 55163, Sept. 12, 2000, as amended at 80 FR 8247, Feb. 17, 2015]
> Spring             '99 | Winter             '98 |Fall             '98 | Summer             '98 | Spring             '98 | Winter             '97 | Fall             '97 | Summer             '97
In recent years, the Federal Highway             Administration (FHWA) has developed a new, expanded statement of policy             regarding walking and bicycling. FHWA has taken the position that             walking and bicycling are legitimate modes of transportation that             have too long been the "forgotten modes," and this should             change. The goals that have been set are:
- ***reduce the current number               of walking and bicycling injuries and fatalities by 10%,***               and 
- ***double the percentage of trips               made by walking and bicycling.***

The Pedestrian Forum is a quarterly             newsletter with the objective of informing the Field Offices of pedestrian             issues such as research and development, new and revised regulations,             programs, innovative projects, successful test and evaluation, etc.             

[ Home     Page ]   [ Safety Tools ]   [ Pedestrian Update ]   [ Roadshow     Schedule ]   [ Talk     ]   [ Links ] 

>
#### § 1506.26 What happens if my employment with USADF ends prior to repaying the full amount of my debt?

If the employee retires, resigns, or the period of employment ends before collection of the debt is completed, the remainder of the debt will be offset from subsequent payments of any nature due the employee (*e.g.* final salary payment, lump-sum leave, etc.).