alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SURFACE  TRANSPORTATION  BOARD       	   ☰✕
          - Proceedings & Actions              - Decisions
            - Filings
            - Environmental Comments
            - Dockets (Including Service Lists)
            - Recordations
            - E-Filing 
          - Reports & Data              - Economic Data
            - Rail Service Data
            - Demurrage & Accessorial Charges
            - Economic Reports & Studies
            - Railroad Cost Adjustment Factor (RCAF)
            - Uniform Rail Costing System (URCS)
            - Carload Waybill Sample
            - Agricultural Contract Summaries
            - Water Carrier Annual Certifications
            - Rail Infrastructure Project Reports 
          - Resources              - Need Assistance?                - Rail Customer and Public Assistance
              - How to File
              - Household Goods Moving 
            - Legal Resources
            - Litigation Alternatives
            - Environmental                - Environmental Overview
              - Historic Preservation Overview
              - Frequently Asked Questions
              - Third-Party Contracting 
            - Railroad Map Depot
            - Stakeholder Committees                - Railroad-Shipper Transportation  Advisory Council
              - Rail Energy Transportation Advisory Committee
              - National Grain Car Council
              - Passenger Rail Advisory Committee 
          - News & Communications              - Latest News
            - Agency Task Forces
            - Non-Docketed Public Correspondence
            - Meetings & Hearings
            - Transcripts & Statements
            - Testimony & Speeches 
          - About STB              - Board Members
            - Offices
            - Agency Materials                - Budget Requests
              - Strategic Plan and Performance & Accountability Reports
              - Small Business Compliance
              - STB Reauthorization Act Reports
              - Annual Reports (1996 – 2017)
              - Annual Employee Surveys 
            - Administrative Issuances
            - Open Government
            - Jobs 
          - Search for:

Home » Reports & Data » Economic Data » Quarterly Wage A&B Data

## Quarterly Wage A&B Data

Wage A&B 2024

Wage A&B 2023

Wage A&B 2022

Wage A&B 2021

Wage A&B 2020

Wage A&B 2019

Wage A&B 2018

Wage A&B 2017

Wage A&B 2016

Wage A&B 2015

Wage A&B 2014

Wage A&B 2013

Wage A&B 2012
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION





I, Hugh Miller, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Delta Financial Corporation;





2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.  The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;







b.   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and








c.   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and







5.  The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.











Date: August 16, 2004


Hugh Miller


President and Chief Executive Officer
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 12, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 12, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19A2248. LETARRIUS MAYNARD SCOTT v. THE STATE.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
§ 3286.105 Requirement for installer licensing. ( a ) *Installer Licensing.* The installer that installs a manufactured home in a state that does not have a qualifying installation program must be certified or licensed in accordance with the requirements in subpart C of this part.
( b ) *Use of licensed installer.* When the retailer or manufacturer agrees to provide any set up in connection with the sale or lease of the home, the retailer or manufacturer must ensure that the installer is licensed in accordance with these regulations.
---

CERTIFICATION OF 
  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
  PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Daniel Black, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
  Officer of Turbodyne Technologies, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Turbodyne Technologies, Inc., for
  the quarterly period ending September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements
  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
  information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents
  in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
  Turbodyne Technologies, Inc.

|Date:  | December 19, 2003      
|------ | -----------------------
|       |                        
|       | /s/ Daniel Black       
|       |                        
|By:    | Daniel Black           
|Title: | Chief Executive Officer
|       | Chief Financial Officer

---
§ 891.190 Emergency transfers for victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking. ( a ) Covered housing providers must develop and implement an emergency transfer plan that meets the requirements in 24 CFR 5.2005(e).
( b ) In order to facilitate emergency transfers for victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking, covered housing providers have discretion to adopt new, and modify any existing, admission preferences or transfer waitlist priorities.
( c ) In addition to following requirements in 24 CFR 5.2005(e), when a safe unit is not immediately available for a victim of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking who qualifies for an emergency transfer, covered housing providers must: ( 1 ) Review the covered housing provider's existing inventory of units and determine when the next vacant unit may be available; and
( 2 ) Provide a listing of nearby HUD subsidized rental properties, with or without preference for persons of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking, and contact information for the local HUD field office.
( d ) Each year, covered housing providers must submit to HUD data on all emergency transfers requested under 24 CFR 5.2005(e), including data on the outcomes of such requests.
[81 FR 80814, Nov. 16, 2016]
#### Kathryn Reale et al., Respondents, v. Violet Pooton, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and loss of services, the defendant appeals from an order of the County Court, Westchester County, entered April 2-9, 1960, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and for an assessment of damages. It appears that the defendant fell upon plaintiff Kathryn Reale while the latter was seated at a table. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. Notwithstanding the fact that no affidavit by the defendant personally was submitted in opposition to the motion, the record presents issues for a trier of the facts to determine as to: (1) whether under all the circumstances defendant’s conduct constituted negligence, and (2) whether under all the circumstances there was contributory negligence on- the part of the injured person. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Vino Green, True Name Henry Dunn, Appellant.

On remittitur from the Court of Appeals, order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on January 24, 1975, unanimously affirmed on the opinion of Lang, J. (80 Misc 2d 626); the indictment reinstated, the judgment of said court rendered on July 19, 1972 unanimously affirmed, and the case remitted to the Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Lupiano, Evans and Lane, JJ.
§ 92.352 Environmental review. ( a ) *General.* The environmental effects of each activity carried out with HOME funds must be assessed in accordance with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321) and the related authorities listed in HUD's implementing regulations at 24 CFR parts 50 and 58. The applicability of the provisions of 24 CFR part 50 or part 58 is based on the HOME project (new construction, rehabilitation, acquisition) or activity (tenant-based rental assistance) as a whole, not on the type of the cost paid with HOME funds.
( b ) *Responsibility for review.* ( 1 ) The jurisdiction (e.g., the participating jurisdiction or State recipient) or insular area must assume responsibility for environmental review, decisionmaking, and action for each activity that it carries out with HOME funds, in accordance with the requirements imposed on a recipient under 24 CFR part 58. No funds may be committed to a HOME activity or project before the completion of the environmental review and approval of the request for release of funds and related certification, except as authorized by 24 CFR part 58.
( 2 ) A State participating jurisdiction must also assume responsibility for approval of requests for release of HOME funds submitted by State recipients.
( 3 ) HUD will perform the environmental review, in accordance with 24 CFR part 50, for a competitively awarded application for HOME funds submitted to HUD by an entity that is not a jurisdiction.
[61 FR 48750, Sept. 16, 1996, as amended at 78 FR 44678, July 24, 2013]
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3257 

To suspend temporarily the duty on biaxially oriented polypropylene dielectric 

film. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 12, 2005 

Mr. OLVER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on biaxially oriented 

polypropylene dielectric film. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BIAXIALLY ORIENTED POLYPROPYLENE DI4 ELECTRIC FILM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.08.23 Biaxially oriented polypropylene dielectric film 

(CAS No. 9003–07–0) (provided in subheading 

3920.20.20) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 3257 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
### §§8771 to 8780. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 8771 to 8780 were omitted from the Code in view of termination of United States Synthetic Fuels Corporation. See note set out under section 8791 of this title.

Section 8771, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §171, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 673, related to general powers of Corporation.

Section 8772, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §172, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 674, related to coordination by Corporation with Federal entities.

Section 8773, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §173, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 675, related to patents.

Section 8774, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §174, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 676, related to utilization of small and disadvantaged businesses.

Section 8775, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §175, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 676; Pub. L. 98–426, §27(d)(2), Sept. 28, 1984, 98 Stat. 1654, provided relationship to other Federal laws.

Section 8776, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §176, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 678, provided for severability of provisions.

Section 8777, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §177, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 678, specified Corporation's fiscal year and provided for audits and reports.

Section 8778, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §178, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 679, related to water rights.

Section 8779, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §179, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 679, related to Western Hemisphere projects.

Section 8780, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §180, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 680, related to a lender financial protection and completion guarantee study.
122 STAT. 612 PUBLIC LAW 110–184—FEB. 6, 2008 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 2110: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 153 (2007): Nov. 16, considered and passed Senate. 

Vol. 154 (2008): Jan. 28, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–184 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 427 North 

Street in Taft, California, as the ‘‘Larry S. Pierce Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. LARRY S. PIERCE POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 427 North Street in Taft, California, shall be 

known and designated as the ‘‘Larry S. Pierce Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Larry S. Pierce Post Office’’. 

Approved February 6, 2008. 

Feb. 6, 2008 

[S. 2110] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29 with PUBLIC LAWS
### §58107. Discrimination at ports by water common carriers

(a) Prohibition.—A common carrier by water may not, directly or indirectly, through an agreement, conference, association, understanding, or otherwise, prevent or attempt to prevent any other common carrier by water from serving any port described in subsection (b) at the same rates the first carrier charges at the nearest port already regularly served by it.

(b) Ports.—A port referred to in subsection (a) is one that is—

(1) designed for the accommodation of ocean-going vessels;

(2) located on an improvement project authorized by law or by a Federal agency; and

(3) located within the continental limits of the United States.

(c) Other Authority Not Limited.—This section does not limit the authority otherwise vested in the Secretary of Transportation and the Federal Maritime Commission.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1672.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 58107 | 46 App.:1115. | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title II, §205, 49 Stat. 1987; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(62), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 159. |

Section
Exhibit
23.2











Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
   To the
Board of Directors and Shareholders of
 Shengtai
Pharmaceutical, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
 We
consent to the incorporation in the registration statement on Form 10-K of our
report dated September 28, 2009 related to the consolidated balance sheet of
Shengtai Pharmaceutical, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2009 and the
related consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income
(loss), shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then
ended.
 
 /s/
Frazer Frost, LLP
 Brea,
      CaliforniaSeptember
      28 2010
     135 South
State College Boulevard, Suite 300 | Brea, California 92821 | 714.990.1040 |
frazerfrost.com
 
 Los
Angeles and Visalia, CA | Little Rock and Fayetteville, AR | Raleigh,
NC
 
 FRAZER FROST, LLPis an independent firm
associated with Moore Stephens International Limited.
#### § 4.20 Purpose.

The provisions of this subpart B are authorized under section 103 of the Department of Housing and Urban Development Reform Act of 1989 (Pub. L. 101-235, approved December 15, 1989) (42 U.S.C. 3537a) (hereinafter, Section 103). Both the provisions of Section 103 and this subpart B apply for the purposes of Section 103. Section 103 proscribes direct or indirect communication of certain information during the selection process by HUD employees to persons within or outside of the Department who are not authorized to receive that information. The purpose of the proscription is to preclude giving an unfair advantage to applicants who would receive information not available to other applicants or to the public. Section 103 also authorizes the Department to impose a civil money penalty on a HUD employee who knowingly discloses protected information, if such a violation of Section 103 is material, and authorizes the Department to sanction the person who received information improperly by, among other things, denying assistance to that person.
### §390h–11. Los Angeles area water reclamation and reuse project

(a) The Secretary is authorized to participate with the city and county of Los Angeles, State of California, West Basin Municipal Water District, and other appropriate authorities, in the design, planning, and construction of water reclamation and reuse projects to treat approximately one hundred and twenty thousand acre-feet per year of effluent from the city and county of Los Angeles, in order to provide new water supplies for industrial, environmental, and other beneficial purposes, to reduce the demand for imported water, and to reduce sewage effluent discharged into Santa Monica Bay.

(b) The Secretary's share of costs associated with the project described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 25 per centum of the total. The Secretary shall not provide funds for operation or maintenance of the project.

(Pub. L. 102–575, title XVI, §1613, Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4667.)
#### § 3285.906 Telephone and cable TV.

It is recommended that the installation instructions explain that telephone and cable TV wiring should be installed in accordance with requirements of the LAHJ and the National Electrical Code, NFPA No. 70-2005 (incorporated by reference, see § 3285.4).
§ 943.150 What procurement standards apply to a PHA's joint venture partner? ( a ) *General.* A joint venture partner is not a grantee or subgrantee and, accordingly, is not required to comply with 2 CFR part 200 in its procurement of goods and services under this part. The partner must comply with all applicable State and local procurement and conflict of interest requirements with respect to its selection of entities to assist in PHA program administration.
( b ) *Exception.* If the joint venture partner is a subsidiary, affiliate, or identity of interest party of the PHA, it is subject to the requirements of 2 CFR part 200 of this title. HUD may, on a case-by-case basis, exempt such a joint venture partner from the need to comply with requirements under 2 CFR part 200 of this title if HUD determines that the joint venture has developed an acceptable alternative procurement plan.
( c ) *Contracting with identity-of-interest parties.* A joint venture partner may contract with an identity-of-interest party for goods or services, or a party specified in the selected bidder's response to a RFP or RFQ (as applicable), without the need for further procurement if: ( 1 ) The PHA can demonstrate that its original competitive selection of the partner clearly anticipated the later provision of such goods or services;
( 2 ) Compensation of all identity-of-interest parties is structured to ensure there is no duplication of profit or expenses; and
( 3 ) The PHA can demonstrate that its selection is reasonable based upon prevailing market costs and standards, and that the quality and timeliness of the goods or services is comparable to that available in the open market. For purposes of this paragraph (c), an “identity-of-interest party” means a party that is wholly owned or controlled by, or that is otherwise affiliated with, the partner or the PHA. The PHA may use an independent organization experienced in cost valuation to determine the cost reasonableness of the proposed contracts.
[65 FR 71207, Nov. 29, 2000, as amended at 80 FR 75942, Dec. 7, 2015]
§ 81.52 Requirement for program requests. ( a ) Before implementing a new program, a GSE shall submit a request for new program approval (“program request”) to the Secretary for the Secretary's review. Submission of a program request is not required where the program that the GSE proposes to implement is not significantly different from: ( 1 ) A program that has already been approved in writing by the Secretary; or
( 2 ) A program that was engaged in by the GSE prior to October 28, 1992.
( b ) If a GSE does not submit a program request for a program, the Secretary may request information about the program and require that the GSE submit a program request. The GSE shall comply with the request and may indicate in such response its views respecting whether the program is subject to the Secretary's review.