alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

December 7, 2004

John Lowber, (907) 868-5628; jlowber@gci.com
Bruce Broquet, (907) 868-6660; bbroquet@gci.com
David Morris, (907) 265-5396; dmorris@gci.com

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

               GCI CLOSES $70 MILLION ADD-ON BOND TRANSACTION AND
                  REPURCHASE OF 3.75 MILLION SHARES HELD BY MCI

ANCHORAGE, AK -- General Communication, Inc. (NASDAQ: GNCMA) ("GCI") announced
today the closing of its $70 million add-on bond transaction. In a private
transaction concurrent with add-on bond closing, GCI repurchased 3,751,509 GCI
Class A common shares at $8.33 per share and $10 million face value of GCI
Series C Preferred Stock from MCI. The aggregate amount of the equity repurchase
totaled $41.3 million. In addition, $10 million of the add-on bond proceeds were
used to repay GCI's outstanding balance on its revolving credit facility. The
remaining balance of the bond proceeds of more than $17 million, after fees and
expenses, will be used for other general corporate purposes.

The add-on bond transaction was led by Deutsche Bank Securities. Jefferies &
Company, Inc., and Calyon Securities (USA) Inc. participated as co-managers.

GCI is the largest Alaska-based and operated integrated telecommunications
provider. A pioneer in bundled services, GCI provides local, wireless, and long
distance telephone, cable television, Internet and data communication services.
More information about the company can be found at www.gci.com.

The foregoing contains forward-looking statements regarding the company's
expected results that are based on management's expectations as well as on a
number of assumptions concerning future events. Actual results might differ
materially from those projected in the forward looking statements due to
uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside GCI's control.
Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those in the forward looking statements is contained in
GCI's cautionary statement sections of Form 10-K and 10-Q filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                      # # #
| Subsidiaries      of MISCOR Group, Ltd. |
|-----------------------------------------|
|                                    |   |

|   | Name                                     |   | Jurisdiction      of Organization |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|   | Magnetech      Industrial Services, Inc. |   | Indiana                           |   |
|   | Martell      Electric, LLC               |   | Indiana                           |   |
|   | HK      Engine Components, LLC           |   | Indiana                           |   |
|   | Magnetech      Power Services, LLC       |   | Indiana                           |   |
|   | Ideal      Consolidated, Inc.            |   | Indiana                           |   |
|   | American      Motive Power, Inc.         |   | Nevada                            |   |
|   | 3-D      Service, Ltd.                   |   | Ohio                              |   |
§ 35.700 Purpose and applicability. ( a ) This subpart H establishes procedures to eliminate as far as practicable lead-based paint hazards in residential properties receiving project-based assistance under a HUD program. The requirements of this subpart apply only to the assisted dwelling units in a covered property and any common areas servicing those dwelling units. This subpart does not apply to housing receiving rehabilitation assistance or to public housing, which are covered by subparts J and M of this part, respectively.
( b ) For the purposes of competitively awarded grants under the Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Program (HOPWA), the Supportive Housing Program (42 U.S.C. 11381-11389) and the Shelter Plus Care Program project-based rental assistance and sponsor-based rental assistance components (42 U.S.C. 11402-11407), the requirements of this subpart shall apply to grants awarded pursuant to Notices of Funding Availability published on or after October 1, 1999. For the purposes of formula grants awarded under the Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Program (HOPWA) (42 U.S.C. 12901 *et seq.*), the requirements of this subpart shall apply to activities for which program funds are first obligated on or after September 15, 2000.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TCI
SATELLITE ENTERTAINMENT INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,366
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,421,546
<DEPRECIATION>                                 311,821
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,170,010
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        474,865
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        67,743
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,053
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,170,010
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               168,500
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,082
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                65,105
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,177
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (69,517)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (69,517)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (69,517)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.03)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-11213

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff–Appellee,

v.

RANDY FLORES ORTIZ, also known as Blue,

Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:17-CR-16-1

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Randy Flores Ortiz has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Ortiz has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant 

portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Ortiz’s response. We concur 

with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 5, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-11213 Document: 00514500584 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/05/2018
No. 17-11213

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 17-11213 Document: 00514500584 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/05/2018
§ 904.202 Objectives. The counseling and training program should seek to achieve the following objectives: ( a ) Enable the potential homebuyer to have a full understanding of the responsibilities that accompany his participation in the Homeownership Opportunity Program;
( b ) Enable the potential homebuyer to have an understanding of homeownership tasks with specific training given to individuals as the need and readiness for counseling or training indicates;
( c ) Assure that the role of the HBA is understood and plans for its organization are initiated at the earliest practical time;
( d ) Develop an understanding of the role of the LHA and of the need for a cooperative relationship between the homebuyer and the LHA;
( e ) Encourage the development of self-help by the homebuyer through reducing dependency and increasing independent action;
( f ) Develop an understanding of mutual assistance and cooperation that will develop a feeling of self-respect, pride and community responsibility;
( g ) Develop local resources that can be of assistance to the individual and the community on an on-going basis.
#### § 60.119 Research undertaken without the intention of involving human subjects.

Except for research waived under § 60.101(i) or exempted under § 60.104, in the event research is undertaken without the intention of involving human subjects, but it is later proposed to involve human subjects in the research, the research shall first be reviewed and approved by an IRB, as provided in this policy, a certification submitted by the institution to the Federal department or agency component supporting the research, and final approval given to the proposed change by the Federal department or agency component.
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Oilwell Varco, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Clay C. Williams, Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.The certification is given to the knowledge of the undersigned.         By:  */s/ Clay C. Williams*   Name: Clay C. Williams   Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  Date: November 5, 2007 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto National Oilwell Varco, Inc. and will be retained by National Oilwell Varco, Inc. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
28
§ 960.505 Occupancy by police officers to provide security for public housing residents. ( a ) *Police officer.* For purpose of this subpart E, “police officer” means a person determined by the PHA to be, during the period of residence of that person in public housing, employed on a full-time basis as a duly licensed professional police officer by a Federal, State or local government or by any agency of these governments. An officer of an accredited police force of a housing agency may qualify.
( b ) *Occupancy in public housing.* For the purpose of increasing security for residents of a public housing development, the PHA may allow police officers who would not otherwise be eligible for occupancy in public housing, to reside in a public housing dwelling unit. The PHA must include in the PHA annual plan or supporting documents the number and location of the units to be occupied by police officers, and the terms and conditions of their tenancies; and a statement that such occupancy is needed to increase security for public housing residents.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Paul N. Eastman, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed. (Appeal from order of Monroe County Court denying a motion to vacate a judgment of conviction for *1026sodomy, second degree on which defendant was sentenced on January 19, 1959 as a second" offender.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and Henry, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 22, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-40206 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARCO AMBROSIO MEZA-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-02-CR-1233-ALL

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Marco Ambrosio Meza-Lopez (Meza) appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Meza argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional. Meza acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), but he asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 489-90 (2000). HeNo. 03-40206 -2- seeks to preserve his argument for possible further review and “to avoid later accusations of procedural default should the law change on this question.”
Meza’s Apprendi argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , 523 U.S. at 235. We must follow the precedent set in Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000) (internal quotation and citation omitted).
AFFIRMED.
#### § 241.625 Eligible borrowers.

In order to be eligible as a borrower under this subpart, the applicant shall be a profit, limited distribution, nonprofit, or cooperative owner of a multifamily housing project which is not covered by a mortgage insured or held by the Secretary and which the Commissioner has determined to be an acceptable risk in that energy conservation or solar energy benefits to be derived outweigh the risks of possible loss of the Federal Government.
#### § 891.825 Mixed-finance closing documents.

The mixed-finance owner must submit the mixed-finance closing documents in the form prescribed by HUD. The materials shall be submitted after the firm commitment has been issued and prior to capital advance closing.
<PAGE>



Exhibit 99.1        Officer's Certificate regarding Annual Statement of
                    Compliance of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp.

                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

The undersigned officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies on behalf of the Company
and on his own behalf for purposes of the Washington Mutual MSC Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-RA2, as follows:

1. I am a duly appointed and qualified First Vice President of the Company.

2. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement related to the
above-referenced series of Certificates.

3. I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate on
behalf of the Company.

4. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and performance under this Agreement has been made under my
supervision.

5. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 29, 2005.





                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.


                     By: /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann
                         -------------------------------------
                         Thomas G. Lehmann
                         First Vice President
### §30101. Extension of jurisdiction to cases of damage or injury on land

(a) In General.—The admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States extends to and includes cases of injury or damage, to person or property, caused by a vessel on navigable waters, even though the injury or damage is done or consummated on land.

(b) Procedure.—A civil action in a case under subsection (a) may be brought in rem or in personam according to the principles of law and the rules of practice applicable in cases where the injury or damage has been done and consummated on navigable waters.

(c) Actions Against United States.—

(1) Exclusive remedy.—In a civil action against the United States for injury or damage done or consummated on land by a vessel on navigable waters, chapter 309 or 311 of this title, as appropriate, provides the exclusive remedy.

(2) Administrative claim.—A civil action described in paragraph (1) may not be brought until the expiration of the 6-month period after the claim has been presented in writing to the agency owning or operating the vessel causing the injury or damage.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §6(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1509.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30101 | 46 App.:740. | June 19, 1948, ch. 526, 62 Stat. 496. |

Section

In subsections (b) and (c), the words "civil action" are substituted for "suit" for consistency with rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (28 App. U.S.C.).

In subsection (c)(1), the words "for all causes of action arising after June 19, 1948, and for all causes of action where suit has not been hitherto filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act" are omitted as obsolete.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 30101, Pub. L. 100–710, title I, §102(c), Nov. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 4738, provided definitions for purposes of this subtitle, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 109–304, §6(b), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1509.

#### Short Title

This section is popularly known as the Admiralty Extension Act.
Exhibit 99.1

 

**FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE**

September 8, 2006

 

For Information Contact:

Bruce Broquet, (907) 868-6660 or bbroquet@gci.com

 

**GCI Presents at Jefferies 4th Annual**

**Communications Conference September 11, 2006**

 

**ANCHORAGE, AK** -- GCI (NASDAQ:GNCMA) announced that Ron Duncan, president and chief executive officer, will be presenting at the Jefferies 4th Annual Communications Conference Monday morning, September 11, 2006 at 8:45 a.m. Eastern Time at the Mandarin Oriental in New York.

 

A live web cast of the event will be accessible at www.wsw.com/webcast/jeff12/gncma/.

 

GCI is the largest telecommunications company in Alaska. A pioneer in bundled services, GCI provides local, wireless, and long distance telephone, cable television, Internet and data communication services throughout Alaska. More information about the company can be found at www.gci.com. 

 

#    #    #
§ 6.12 Procedure for effecting compliance. ( a ) Whenever the Assistant Secretary determines that a Recipient of Federal financial assistance has failed to comply with Section 109(a) or this part and voluntary compliance efforts have failed, the Secretary will notify the Governor of the State or the Chief Executive Officer of the unit of general local government of the findings of noncompliance and will request that the Governor or the Chief Executive Officer secure compliance. If within a reasonable period of time, not to exceed 60 days, the Governor or the Chief Executive Officer fails or refuses to secure compliance, the Secretary will: ( 1 ) Refer the matter to the Attorney General with a recommendation that an appropriate civil action be instituted;
( 2 ) Exercise the powers and functions provided by Title VI;
( 3 ) Terminate or reduce payments under Title I, or limit the availability of payments under Title I to programs or activities not affected by the failure to comply; or
( 4 ) Take such other actions as may be provided by law, including, but not limited to, the initiation of proceedings under 2 CFR part 2424 or any applicable proceeding under State or local law.
( b ) *Termination, reduction, or limitation of the availability of Title I payments.* No order terminating, reducing, or limiting the availability of Title I payments under this part shall become effective until: ( 1 ) The Secretary has notified the Governor of the State or the Chief Executive Officer of the unit of general local government of the Recipient's failure to comply in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section and of the termination, reduction or limitation of the availability of Title I payments to be taken;
( 2 ) The Secretary has determined that compliance cannot be secured by voluntary means;
( 3 ) The Recipient has been extended an opportunity for a hearing in accordance with § 6.13(a); and
( 4 ) A final agency notice or decision has been rendered in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section or 24 CFR part 180.
( c ) If a Recipient does not respond to the notice of opportunity for a hearing or does not elect to proceed with a hearing within 20 days of the issuance of the Secretary's actions listed in paragraphs (b)(1), (2) and (3) of this section, then the Secretary's approval of the termination, reduction or limitation of the availability of Title I payments is considered a final agency notice and the Recipient may seek judicial review in accordance with section 111(c) of the Act.
[64 FR 3797, Jan. 25, 1999, as amended at 72 FR 73491, Dec. 27, 2007]
================================================================================

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE


 $25,000.00 USA                                          Date: January 12, 2007

 FOR VALUE RECEIVED,  QUANTUM ENERGY INC (the  "Promissor'`)  hereby promises to
pay to COACH  CAPITAL  LLC, or such other  holder for the time being hereof (the
"Holder"),  the principal amount of Twenty-five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00) in
United States currency (the "Principal Amount"),  and to pay interest thereon at
the rate of ten per cent (10%) per annum calculated  annually from.  January 12,
2007 on so much, of the Principal  Amount as shall be  outstanding  from time to
time, ON DEMAND.

Time shall be of the essence of this Note.  Extension of time for payment of all
or. any part of the amount owing  hereunder at any time or times,  or failure of
the Holder to enforce any of the rights or remedies hereunder, shall not release
the Promissor  and shall not  constitute a waiver of the rights of the Holder to
enforce such rights and remedies thereafter.

Should suit be brought to recover on this Note,  the  Promissor  promises to pay
reasonable attorney's fees and court costs in addition to the amount found to be
due on this Note.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Promissor has executed this Note on January 12, 2007.


QUANTUM ENERGY, INC.


By: /s/
----------------------------
Authorized Signatory
#### § 92.217 Income targeting: Homeownership.

Each participating jurisdiction must invest HOME funds made available during a fiscal year so that with respect to homeownership assistance, 100 percent of these funds are invested in dwelling units that are occupied by households that qualify as low-income families.

[67 FR 61756, Oct. 1, 2002]