alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1 -- Servicer's Annual Statement of Compliance


						100 Wood Hollow Drive
						Novato, CA 94945

					[GreenPoint Mortgage logo]


March 15, 2005


   RE:	GreenPoint Home Equity Loan Trust (Series 2004-3);
        Annual Statement as to Comp1iance by the Servicer

Ladies and Gentlemen:

	Pursuant to Section 3.09 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and
Section 4(f) of the Underwriting Agreement with respect to the above-referenced
offering, the undersigned officer of GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.
(as "Servicer") hereby certifies as to the following (capitalized terms have the
meanings used in the Sale and Servicing Agreement):

    1.	a review of the activities of the Servicer and its performance under the
        Sale and Servicing Agreement during the preceding fiscal year since the
        inception of the trust has been made under the direct supervision of the
        undersigned officer; and

    2.	to the best knowledge of the undersigned officer, based on such review,
        the Servicer has fulfilled all of its material obligations under the
        Sale and Servicing Agreement throughout the applicable period, and there
        has been no known default in the fulfillment of the Servicer's material
        obligations throughout such period, except in connection with the
	servicing of the Mortgage Loans by the Servicer, in certain
	circumstances the mortgage interest rate changes on certain Mortgage
	Loans were not adjusted at the appropriate date in accordance with the
	Mortgagor's loan documents.  This resulted in the Mortgagor being
	overcharged for the period from the interest rate change until the
	correct effective date, which was the first day of the following month.
	As a result, more interest was collected for distribution in certain
	Collection Periods than would otherwise be the case.  There was no
	impact, however, on the calculation of amounts due and payable on the
	Notes or on the amounts paid on the Notes.  The number of Mortgage
	Loans not adjusted at the appropriate date was 3,644, with a total
	overcharge of approximately $79,375.79.  No reimbursement of these
	overcharges which were paid to the Trust Fund will be requested by the
	Servicer.  This error was identified by Management and the systematic
	issue that caused the incorrect calculation of interest was resolved
	prior to the issuance of this letter.  All Mortgagors that were
	overcharged will be refunded any excess interest paid.

						Very truly yours

						GREENPOINT MORTGAGE
						FUNDING, INC.,
						as Servicer

						/S/ Nathan Hieter
						Name:	Nathan Hieter
						Title:	Senior Vice President
#### § 570.906 Review of urban counties.

In reviewing the performance of an urban county, HUD will hold the county accountable for the actions or failures to act of any of the units of general local government participating in the urban county. Where the Department finds that a participating unit of government has failed to cooperate with the county to undertake or assist in undertaking an essential community development or assisted housing activity and that such failure results, or is likely to result, in a failure of the urban county to meet any requirement of the program or other applicable laws, the Department may prohibit the county's use of funds made available under this part for that unit of government. HUD will also consider any such failure to cooperate in its review of a future cooperation agreement between the county and such included unit of government described at § 570.307(b)(2).
#### § 92.501 HOME Investment Partnership Agreement.

Allocated and reallocated funds will be made available pursuant to a HOME Investment Partnership Agreement. The agreement ensures that HOME funds invested in affordable housing are repayable if the housing ceases to qualify as affordable housing before the period of affordability expires.
Editorial Note on Part 982
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999, and at 89 FR 38293, May 7, 2024.

§ 982.609 Congregate housing: Housing quality standards. ( a ) *HQS standards for congregate housing.* As defined in § 982.4, HQS refers to the minimum quality standards developed by HUD in accordance with 24 CFR 5.703 for housing assisted under the HCV program, including any variations approved by HUD for the PHA under 24 CFR 5.705(a)(3). However, the standards in this section apply in place of standards related to food preparation and refuse disposal. Congregate housing is not subject to the requirement that the dwelling unit must have a kitchen area.
( b ) *Food preparation and refuse disposal: Additional performance requirements.* The following additional performance requirements apply to congregate housing: ( 1 ) The unit must contain a refrigerator of appropriate size.
( 2 ) There must be central kitchen and dining facilities on the premises. These facilities: ( i ) Must be located within the premises, and accessible to the residents;
( ii ) Must contain suitable space and equipment to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner;
( iii ) Must be used to provide a food service that is provided for the residents, and that is not provided by the residents; and
( iv ) Must be for the primary use of residents of the congregate units and be sufficient in size to accommodate the residents.
( 3 ) There must be adequate facilities and services for the sanitary disposal of food waste and refuse, including facilities for temporary storage where necessary.
[63 FR 23865, Apr. 30, 1998, as amended at 88 FR 30504, May 11, 2023; 89 FR 38303, May 7, 2024]
### §502. Cargo exempt from forfeiture

Cargo on a vessel is exempt from forfeiture under this title if—

(1) the cargo is owned in good faith by a person not the owner, master, or crewmember of the vessel; and

(2) the customs duties on the cargo have been paid or secured for payment as provided by law.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §4, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1490.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 502 | 46 App.:326. | R.S. §4378. |

Section
#### § 891.765 Lease requirements.

The lease requirements are provided in § 891.425.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3367 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include wireless telecommunications equipment in the definition of qualified technological equipment 

for purposes of determining the depreciation treatment of such equipment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 20, 2005 

Mr. HULSHOF (for himself and Mr. BECERRA) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include 

wireless telecommunications equipment in the definition 

of qualified technological equipment for purposes of determining the depreciation treatment of such equipment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIP4 MENT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

6 168(i)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining 

7 qualified technological equipment) is amended by striking 

8 ‘‘and’’ at the end of clause (ii), by striking the period at 
2 

•HR 3367 IH 

1 the end of clause (iii) and inserting ‘‘, and’’, and by adding 

2 after clause (iii) the following new clause: 

3 ‘‘(iv) any wireless telecommunications 

4 equipment.’’. 

5 (b) WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIP6 MENT.—Section 168(i)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code 

7 of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following 

8 new subparagraph: 

9 ‘‘(D) WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS

10 EQUIPMENT.—For purposes of this paragraph, 

11 the term ‘wireless telecommunications equip12 ment’ means all equipment used in the trans13 mission, reception, coordination, or switching of 

14 wireless telecommunications service, other than 

15 cell towers, buildings, T–1 lines or other cabling 

16 connecting cell sites to mobile switching centers. 

17 For purposes of the preceding sentence, the 

18 term ‘wireless telecommunications service’ in19 cludes any commercial mobile radio service as 

20 defined in title 47 of the Code of Federal Regu21 lations.’’. 

22 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

23 this section shall apply to property placed in service on 

24 or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
§ 891.560 HAP contract. ( a ) *HAP contract.* The housing assistance payments contract sets forth rights and duties of the Borrower and HUD with respect to the project and the housing assistance payments.
( b ) *HAP contract execution.* ( 1 ) Upon satisfactory completion of the project, the Borrower and HUD shall execute the HAP contract on the form prescribed by HUD.
( 2 ) The effective date of the HAP contract may be earlier than the date of execution, but no earlier than the date of HUD's issuance of the permission to occupy.
( 3 ) If the project is completed in stages, the procedures of paragraph (b) of this section shall apply to each stage.
( c ) *Housing assistance payments to owners under the HAP contract.* The housing assistance payments made under the HAP contract are: ( 1 ) *Payments to the Borrower to assist eligible families leasing assisted units.* The amount of the housing assistance payment made to the Borrower for an assisted unit leased to an eligible family is equal to the difference between the contract rent for the unit and the tenant rent payable by the family.
( 2 ) *Payments to the Borrower for vacant assisted units (vacancy payments).* The amount of and conditions for vacancy payments are described in § 891.650. The housing assistance payments are made monthly by HUD upon proper requisition by the Borrower, except payments for vacancies of more than 60 days, which are made semiannually by HUD upon requisition by the Borrower.
( d ) *Payment of utility reimbursement.* As applicable, a utility reimbursement will be paid to a family occupying an assisted unit as an additional housing assistance payment. The HAP contract will provide that the Borrower will make this payment on behalf of HUD. Funds will be paid to the Borrower in trust solely for the purpose of making the additional payment. The Borrower may pay the utility reimbursement jointly to the family and the utility company, or, if the family and utility company consent, directly to the utility company.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

LESTER F. ANDERSON,

Defendant Below, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Appellee. §

§ § No. 113, 2022 § § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware § § Cr. ID No. 30109009DI (N) § §

Submitted: August 30, 2022 Decided: September 27, 2022

Before SEITZ , Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR , Justices.

ORDER

After consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the appellee’s motion to

affirm, 1 and the record on appeal, we conclude that the judgment of the Superior

Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated in its February

28, 2022 order denying the appellant’s request that the court vacate his first-degree

murder conviction and life sentence.

1 The appellant’s request for leave to respond to the motion to affirm is denied. Under Supreme Court Rule 25(a), a response to a motion to affirm is not permitted unless requested by the Court. The Court did not request a response to the motion to affirm and finds no reason to request a response after considering the appellant’s motion.2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion for leave to respond

to the motion to affirm is DENIED, the motion to affirm is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Chief Justice
§ 884.213 Execution of housing assistance payments contract. ( a ) *Time of execution.* Upon acceptance of the project by HUD pursuant to § 884.212, the Contract shall be executed first by the Owner and then by HUD, or, in the case of a Private-Owner/PHA Project, executed by the Owner and the PHA and then approved by HUD.
( b ) *Unleased units.* At the time of execution of the Contract, HUD (or the PHA, as appropriate) shall examine the lists of dwelling units leased and not leased, referred to in § 884.211(e) and shall determine whether or not the Owner has met his obligations under that section with respect to any unleased units. HUD (or the PHA, as appropriate) shall state in writing its determination with respect to the unleased units and for which of those units it will make housing assistance payments. The Owner shall indicate in writing his concurrence with this determination or his disagreement, reserving his rights to claim housing assistance payments for the unleased units pursuant to the Contract, without prejudice by reason of his signing the Contract. Copies of all documents referred to this paragraph shall be furnished to HUD in the case of a Private-Owner/PHA Project.
### §5024. Use of locally generated contributions in National Senior Service Corps

Whenever locally generated contributions made to National Senior Service Corps projects under this subchapter are in excess of the amount required by the Director, the Director may not restrict the manner in which such contributions are expended if expenditures from locally generated contributions are not inconsistent with the provisions of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 93–113, title II, §224, as added Pub. L. 98–288, §16(a), May 21, 1984, 98 Stat. 194; amended Pub. L. 99–551, §10(b)(1), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3077; Pub. L. 101–204, title IX, §902(6), Dec. 7, 1989, 103 Stat. 1826; Pub. L. 103–82, title III, §341(b)(3), Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 904; Pub. L. 103–304, §3(b)(9), Aug. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 1568; Pub. L. 111–13, title II, §2146(c), Apr. 21, 2009, 123 Stat. 1589.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 93–113, Oct. 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 394, known as the Domestic Volunteer Service Act of 1973, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4950 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

2009—Pub. L. 111–13 substituted "Service" for "Volunteer" in section catchline and "Service Corps" for "Volunteer Corps" in text.

1994—Pub. L. 103–304 substituted "National Senior Volunteer Corps projects" for "volunteer projects for older Americans".

1993—Pub. L. 103–82 amended section catchline and in text directed substitution of "National Senior Volunteer Corps projects" for "volunteer projects for Older Americans", which could not be executed because the phrase "volunteer projects for Older Americans" did not appear in text.

1989—Pub. L. 101–204 substituted "projects" for "programs".

1986—Pub. L. 99–551 amended directory language of Pub. L. 98–288 to correct an error, and did not involve any change in text.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2009 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–13 effective Oct. 1, 2009, see section 6101(a) of Pub. L. 111–13, set out as a note under section 4950 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1993 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–82 effective Oct. 1, 1993, see section 392 of Pub. L. 103–82, set out as a note under section 4951 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–551 effective Oct. 1, 1986, except as otherwise provided, see section 11 of Pub. L. 99–551, set out as an Effective Date note under section 4950 of this title.
#### § 1218.705 What is ONRR's policy on recommending revocation of your ability to engage in Federal or Indian leasing, licensing, or granting of easements, permits, or rights-of-way?

The Director may recommend that the leasing or issuing agency, under statutory or regulatory authority applicable to that agency, revoke your ability to engage in Federal or Indian leasing, licensing, or granting of easements, permits, or rights-of-way if you inexcusably or willfully fail to pay a debt. The Director will recommend that any revocation of your ability to engage in Federal or Indian leasing, licensing, or granting of easements, permits, or rights-of-way should last only as long as your debt remains unpaid or unresolved.
Exhibit32.2

|   | 1.        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,    and |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2.        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of      Registrant. |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                       |                                               |                       |
|----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|
|                       |                                               |                       |
| Dated:      April 15, 2009 |                                               | /s/      Vincent Colangelo |
|                       | Vincent      ColangeloChief      Financial Officer |
|                       |                                               |                       |

----
### §51906. Special certificates for civilian service to armed forces

(a) General Authority.—The Maritime Administrator may issue a special certificate to an individual, or the personal representative of an individual, in recognition of service of that individual in the merchant marine of the United States, if the service has been determined to be active duty under section 401 of the GI Bill Improvement Act of 1977 (Public Law 95–202; 38 U.S.C. 106 note).

(b) Relationship to Other Laws.—Issuance of a certificate under subsection (a) does not entitle an individual to any rights, privileges, or benefits under a law of the United States.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(b), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1585.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 51906 | 46 App.:2006. | Pub. L. 100–324, §7, May 30, 1988, 102 Stat. 577. |

Section
#### Jeanette Bird, Petitioner, v New York State Employees’ Retirement System et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred originally to the Appellate Division, Second Department, and thereafter by the Appellate Division, Second Department, on its own motion to this court) to review a determination by the State Comptroller, which denied petitioner’s application for a redetermination of her member service credit in the New York State Employees’ Retirement System. Petitioner, a member of the New York State Employees’ Retirement System, was employed as a library clerk in the Long Beach City School District. She intended to retire after 20 years of service and, upon inquiry, was informed by the retirement system that if she retired on September 1, 1975, her retirement benefits would be computed under section 75-i of the Retirement and Social Security Law. Petitioner informed her school administration that she planned to retire at the end of the 1974-1975 school year. It is conceded by the respondent that while the school year is considered to terminate on July 1, petitioner was entitled to a vacation of the months of July and August so that, in actuality, the school year terminated at the end of August. Through error, petitioner listed June 30, 1975 as her retirement date when she filed her retirement papers, although she was *entitled*to designate September 1, 1975 as her retirement date, and in fact, legally served through August 31, 1975. Petitioner explained that she mistakenly listed July 1, 1975 as her retirement date because she and all other full-time faculty worked under a school year calendar that runs from September to the last day in June. Salaries are based on this 10-month period (Education Law, § 3101, subd [3]). It was this method of operation which led petitioner to believe that her 20 years of service ended with her last day of work in her twentieth school year, i.e., June 30, 1975. In our view, we find the determination arbitrary and capricious. Determination annulled, without costs, and matter remitted to respondent for proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
### §7385c. Exclusivity of remedy against the United States and against contractors and subcontractors

#### (a) In general

The liability of the United States or an instrumentality of the United States under this subchapter with respect to a cancer (including a specified cancer), chronic silicosis, covered beryllium illness, or death related thereto of a covered employee is exclusive and instead of all other liability—

(1) of—

(A) the United States;

(B) any instrumentality of the United States;

(C) a contractor that contracted with the Department of Energy to provide management and operation, management and integration, or environmental remediation of a Department of Energy facility (in its capacity as a contractor);

(D) a subcontractor that provided services, including construction, at a Department of Energy facility (in its capacity as a subcontractor); and

(E) an employee, agent, or assign of an entity specified in subparagraphs (A) through (D);

(2) to—

(A) the covered employee;

(B) the covered employee's legal representative, spouse, dependents, survivors, and next of kin; and

(C) any other person, including any third party as to whom the covered employee, or the covered employee's legal representative, spouse, dependents, survivors, or next of kin, has a cause of action relating to the cancer (including a specified cancer), chronic silicosis, covered beryllium illness, or death, otherwise entitled to recover damages from the United States, the instrumentality, the contractor, the subcontractor, or the employee, agent, or assign of one of them,

because of the cancer (including a specified cancer), chronic silicosis, covered beryllium illness, or death in any proceeding or action including a direct judicial proceeding, a civil action, a proceeding in admiralty, or a proceeding under a tort liability statute or the common law.

#### (b) Applicability

This section applies to all cases filed on or after October 30, 2000.

#### (c) Workers' compensation

This section does not apply to an administrative or judicial proceeding under a Federal or State workers' compensation law.

#### (d) Applicability to part E

This section applies with respect to part E to the covered medical condition or covered illness or death of a covered DOE contractor employee on the same basis as it applies with respect to part B to the cancer (including a specified cancer), chronic silicosis, covered beryllium illness, or death of a covered employee.

(Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [div. C, title XXXVI, §3644], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–509; Pub. L. 108–375, div. C, title XXXI, §3162(d), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2186.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2004—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 108–375 added subsec. (d).