Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 231 / Tuesday, December 1, 2020 / Notices 77237 

2All contract personnel will sign appropriate 

nondisclosure agreements. 

3Electronic Document Information System 

(EDIS): https://edis.usitc.gov. 

developing or maintaining the records 

of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in 

internal investigations, audits, reviews, 

and evaluations relating to the 

programs, personnel, and operations of 

the Commission including under 5 

U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. 

government employees and contract 

personnel,2 solely for cybersecurity 

purposes. All nonconfidential written 

submissions will be available for public 

inspection at the Office of the Secretary 

and on EDIS.3

This action is taken under the 

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), 

and of §§ 201.10 and 210.8(c) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 210.8(c)). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: November 25, 2020. 

Katherine Hiner, 

Supervisory Attorney. 

[FR Doc. 2020–26509 Filed 11–30–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1232] 

Certain Chocolate Milk Powder and 

Packaging Thereof; Institution of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

October 29, 2020, under section 337 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on 

behalf of Meenaxi Enterprise Inc. of 

Edison, New Jersey. A supplement was 

filed on November 10, 2020. The 

complaint alleges violations of section 

337 based upon the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

and the sale within the United States 

after importation of certain chocolate 

milk powder and packaging thereof by 

reason of infringement of U.S. 

Trademark Registration No. 4,206,026 

(‘‘the ’026 trademark’’). The complaint 

further alleges that an industry in the 

United States exists as required by the 

applicable Federal Statute. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

general exclusion order and cease and 

desist orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigation, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–2560. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority: The authority for institution of 

this investigation is contained in section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2020). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

November 24, 2020, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(C) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain products 

identified in paragraph (2) by reason of 

infringement of the ’026 trademark; and 

whether an industry in the United 

States exists as required by subsection 

(a)(2) of section 337; 

(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the 

plain language description of the 

accused products or category of accused 

products, which defines the scope of the 

investigation, is ‘‘chocolate milk powder 

in consumer-sized container with the 

Bournvita label’’; 

(3) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: Meenaxi 

Enterprise Inc., 86–88 Executive Ave., 

Edison, NJ 08817. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Bharat Bazar Inc., 34301 Alvarado Niled 

Road, Union City, CA 94086 

Madras Group Inc. d/b/a Madras 

Groceries, 1177 West El Camino Real, 

Sunnyvale, CA 94087 

Coconut Hill Inc. d/b/a Coconut Hill, 

554 Murphy Ave., Sunnyvale, CA 

94086 

Organic Food Inc. d/b/a Namaste Plaza 

Indian Super Market, 3269 Walnut 

Ave., Fremont, CA 94538 

India Cash & Carry Inc. d/b/a India Cash 

& Carry, 1032 E. El Camino Real, 

Sunnyvale, CA 94087 

New India Bazar Inc. d/b/a New India 

Bazar, 2368 Bentley Ridge Dr, San 

Jose, CA 94538 

Aapka Big Bazar, 831–833 Newark 

Avenue, Jersey City, NJ 07306 

Siya Cash & Carry Inc. d/b/a Siya Cash 

& Carry, 832 Newark Avenue, Jersey 

City, NJ 07306 

JFK Indian Grocery LLC d/b/a D-Mart 

Super Market, 3000 Kennedy Blvd., 

Jersey City, NJ 07306 

Trinethra Indian Super Markets, 39207 

Cedar Blvd., Newark, CA 94560 

Apna Bazar Cash & Carry Inc. d/b/a 

Apna Bazar Cash & Carry, 1700 Oak 

Tree Road, Edison, NJ 08820 

Subzi Mandi Cash & Carry Inc. d/b/a 

Subzi Mandi Cash & Carry, 1347 

Stelton Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854 

Subhlaxmi Grocers, 550 Stelton Road, 

Piscataway, NJ 08854 

Patidar Cash & Carry Inc. d/b/a Patidar 

Cash & Carry, 128 Durham Ave., 

South Plainfield, NJ 07080 

Keemat Grocers, 3311 Highway 6 S, 

Sugarland, TX 77478 

KGF World Food Warehouse Inc. d/b/a 

World Food Mart, 14625 Beechnut St., 

Houston, TX 77083 

Telfair Spices, 1219 Museum Square 

Dr., Suite 100, Sugarland, TX 77479 

Indian Groceries and Spices Inc. d/b/a 

iShoplndia.com, 10701 W. North 

Avenue, Suite 100, Milwaukee, WI 

53226 

Rani Foods LP d/b/a Rani’s World 

Foods, 16721 Hollister Street, Suite Q, 

Houston, TX 77066 

Tathastu Trading LLC, 100 Ryan St. Ste 

21, South Plainfield, NJ 07080 

Choice Trading LLC, 7000 Kennedy 

Blvd. East, Guttenberg, NJ 07093 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(4) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES4
77238 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 231 / Tuesday, December 1, 2020 / Notices 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as 

amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19, 

2020), such responses will be 

considered by the Commission if 

received not later than 20 days after the 

date of service by the complainant of the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation. Extensions of time for 

submitting responses to the complaint 

and the notice of investigation will not 

be granted unless good cause therefor is 

shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: November 25, 2020. 

Katherine Hiner, 

Supervisory Attorney. 

[FR Doc. 2020–26468 Filed 11–30–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1204] 

Certain Chemical Mechanical 

Planarization Slurries and Components 

Thereof; Notice of a Commission 

Determination Not To Review an Initial 

Determination Granting Complainant’s 

Motion To Amend the Complaint and 

the Notice of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 8) of the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

granting complainant’s motion to amend 

the complaint and the notice of 

investigation to correct the name of the 

complainant. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–2392. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 7, 

2020, the Commission instituted this 

investigation under section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 337’’), based on a 

complaint filed by Cabot 

Microelectronics Corporation of Aurora, 

Illinois (‘‘Cabot’’). 85 FR 40685–86 (Jul. 

7, 2020). The complaint alleges a 

violation of section 337 in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, or the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain chemical mechanical 

planarization slurries and components 

thereof by reason of infringement of one 

or more claims of U.S. Patent No. 

9,499,721 (‘‘the ’721 patent’’). The 

complaint also alleges the existence of 

a domestic industry. The notice of 

investigation names as respondents 

DuPont de Nemours, Inc. of 

Wilmington, Delaware; Rohm and Haas 

Electronic Materials CMP Inc. of 

Newark, Delaware; Rohm and Haas 

Electronic Materials CMP Asia Inc. (d/ 

b/a Rohm and Haas Electronic Materials 

CMP Asia Inc., Taiwan Branch (U.S.A.)) 

of Taoyuan City, Taiwan; Rohm and 

Haas Electronic Materials Asia-Pacific 

Co., Ltd. of Miaoli, Taiwan; Rohm and 

Haas Electronic Materials K.K. of Tokyo, 

Japan; and Rohm and Haas Electronic 

Materials LLC of Marlborough, 

Massachusetts. Id. at 40686. The 

Commission’s Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations is also named as a party 

in this investigation. Id. Subsequently, 

the Commission amended the complaint 

and the notice of investigation to assert 

infringement of additional claims of the 

’721 patent. Order No. 7 (Oct. 1, 2020), 

unreviewed by Notice (Oct. 19, 2020). 

See 85 FR 67371–72 (Oct. 22, 2020). 

On October 7, 2020, pursuant to 19 

CFR 210.14(b)(1), Cabot filed a motion 

for leave to ‘‘amend the Complaint and 

the Notice of Institution of Investigation 

(‘NOI’) to change the name of 

Complainant from Cabot 

Microelectronics Corporation to CMC 

Materials, Inc.’’ Mot. at 1. The motion 

states that ‘‘[a]ll other parties stated that 

they will not oppose this Motion.’’ Id. 

No response was filed. 

On November 10, 2020, the ALJ 

issued the subject ID (Order No. 8) 

granting complainant’s motion. The ID 

finds that, based on the review of the 

evidence, good cause exists to change 

the name of the complainant from Cabot 

Microelectronics Corporation to CMC 

Materials, Inc. ID at 2. The ID further 

finds that this amendment would not 

prejudice the public interest or the 

rights of the parties to the investigation. 

Id. No party petitioned for review of the 

ID. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the subject ID. 

The Commission vote for this 

determination took place on November 

24, 2020. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in Part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR part 

210. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: November 24, 2020. 

William Bishop, 

Supervisory Hearings and Information 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2020–26398 Filed 11–30–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1231] 

Certain Digital Imaging Devices and 

Products Containing the Same and 

Components Thereof Institution of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

September 25, 2020, under section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 

on behalf of Pictos Technologies, Inc. of 

San Jose, California. An amended 

complaint was filed on October 23, 

2020, and supplemented on November 

13, 2020 and November 16, 2020. The 

complaint, as amended, alleges 

violations of section 337 based upon the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES4