alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-22-00017-CV 

 

JATIA BLUNT, APPELLANT 

V. 

REAL STAR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, APPELLEE 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 

 Bell County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 21CCV91477, Honorable Jeanne Parker, Presiding 

February 7, 2022 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ. 

Appellant, Jatia Blunt, proceeding pro se, filed a notice of appeal from the trial 

court’s judgment without paying the requisite filing fee.1 By letter of January 5, 2022, the 

Clerk of this Court notified Blunt that the filing fee was overdue and that unless she was 

excused from paying court costs under Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1, failure to pay 

1 Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the 

Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001.
2

the filing fee by January 18 would result in dismissal of the appeal. To date, Blunt has 

not paid the filing fee or sought leave to proceed without payment of court costs.

Because Blunt has failed to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules and 

a notice from the Clerk requiring action within a specified time, we dismiss the appeal. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(b), 42.3(c).

Per Curiam
Z

l..LJ

:::c

a

u

z

a:::: >

L1.J

10

11

6

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS

1 Michael S. Kogan (SBN 128500)

Michael V. Mancini (SBN 263799)

2 ERVIN COHEN & JESSUP LLP

9401 Wilshire Boulevard, Ninth Floor

3 Beverly Hills, California 90212-2974

Telephone (310) 273-6333

4 Facsimile (310) 859-2325

mkogan@ecjlaw.com

5 mmancini@ecjlaw.com

Attorneys for Kennedy Funding, Inc.

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case No. C 09-01957 RS

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE

TO RESPOND TO COUNTER-CLAIMS OF

NEWPORT AVALON INVESTORS, LLC

Date: [No Hearing Required]

Place: Courtroom 3, 17th Floor

Judge: The Honorable Richard Seeborg

IDOCS:12416.9:1079540.1

*E-Filed 8/4/10*

Case 3:09-cv-01957-RS Document 125 Filed 08/04/10 Page 1 of 2
8

9 DATE:

The Honorable Richard Seeborg

10 United States District Court Judge

c,

::::> 11 V'l

V'l

IJ.J

-, 12

Z

13

IJ.J

J: 14

0

U 15

Z

> 16

r:t::

LLJ

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 The Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Respond to Counter-Claims of Newport Avalon

2 Investors, LLC (the "Stipulation") has been filed with the Court. The Court having read and

3 considered the Stipulation,

4 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED THAT:

5 1. The deadline for Kennedy Funding, Inc. ("Kennedy") to respond to the Counter-Claims

6 against Kennedy in the above-entitled matter (the "Counter-Claims") is extended by 7 days, such

7 that Kennedy may file a response to the Counter-Claims on or before August 10,2010.

IDOCS:12416.9:1079540.1 2

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS

8/4/10

Case 3:09-cv-01957-RS Document 125 Filed 08/04/10 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.7





	



Demand Promissory Note, dated September 22, 2022, in the principal amount of $15,000 from Bookmakers Company US, LLC payable to Victor Salerno 


 


Please refer to the accompanying Exhibit 10.7. It is saved in PDF format.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCEPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2004-29 (the Trust) I, Nancy H. Forte, a duly elected and acting officer of Citibank, N.A. (Indenture Trustee),
do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture Trustee, that: 1. I have reviewed and examined the performance by the Indenture Trustee of the application of
trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section
6.06 of the Indenture pursuant to which the Trusts notes were issued during the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2004 (the Relevant Year); and 2. Based upon my review and examination described in 1 above, and except as provided in the
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Compliance, dated March 15, 2005,
prepared by the Ernst & Young LLP substantially in accordance with Section 4.05 of the Expense and
Indemnity Agreement, to the best of my knowledge, the application of trust money collected by the
Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the Indenture was
performed in accordance with the terms of the Indenture throughout the Relevant Year. CITIBANK, N.A., as Indenture Trustee By:
    /s/ Nancy H. ForteName:
    Nancy H. ForteTitle:
    Assistant Vice President Date: March 29, 2005
#### In the Matter of Old Republic Life Insurance Company et al., Respondents, against Julius S. Wikler, as Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, Appellant.

Motion to add case to the September Term Calendar. Motion denied, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0016

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RILEY JOSEPH LANDWEHR,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including December 14, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 1 2022

11/01/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0016
#### § 3288.5 Retailer notification at sale.

*Retailer notice at the time of signing.* At the time of signing a contract for sale or lease for a manufactured home, the retailer must provide the purchaser with a retailer notice. This notice may be in a separate document from the sales contract or may be incorporated clearly in a separate section on consumer dispute resolution information at the top of the sales contract. The notice must include the following language:

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program is available to resolve disputes among manufacturers, retailers, or installers concerning defects in manufactured homes. Many states also have a consumer assistance or dispute resolution program. For additional information about these programs, see sections titled “Dispute Resolution Process” and “Additional Information—HUD Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program” in the Consumer Manual required to be provided to the purchaser. These programs are not warranty programs and do not replace the manufacturer's, or any other person's, warranty program.
### §50104. Studies of general maritime problems

The Secretary of Transportation shall study all maritime problems arising in carrying out the policy in section 50101 of this title.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(b), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1558.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 50104 | 46 App.:1122(a). | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title II, §212(a), 49 Stat. 1990; Aug. 6, 1981, Pub. L. 97–31, §12(69), 95 Stat. 159. |

Section
### §12302. Standard numbering system

(a) The Secretary shall prescribe by regulation a standard numbering system for vessels to which this chapter applies. On application by a State, the Secretary shall approve a State numbering system that is consistent with the standard numbering system. In carrying out its numbering system, a State shall adopt any definitions of relevant terms prescribed by regulations of the Secretary.

(b) A State with an approved numbering system is the issuing authority within the meaning of this chapter. The Secretary is the issuing authority in a State in which a State numbering system has not been approved.

(c) When a vessel is numbered in a State, it is deemed in compliance with the numbering system of a State in which it temporarily is operated.

(d) When a vessel is removed to a new State of principal operation, the issuing authority of that State shall recognize the validity of the number issued by the original State for 60 days.

(e) If a State has a numbering system approved after the Secretary issues a number, the State shall recognize the validity of the number issued by the Secretary for one year.

(f) When the Secretary decides that a State numbering system is not being carried out consistent with the standard numbering system or the State has changed the system without the Secretary's approval, the Secretary may withdraw approval after giving notice to the State, in writing, stating the reasons for the withdrawal.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 590.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 12302 | 46:1467 |

Section 12302 provides for a standard numbering system for undocumented vessels and for approval of State numbering systems by the Secretary. It also requires that a State, when implementing its numbering system, adopt any relevant terms required by the Secretary. In States without approved numbering systems, the Federal Government issues the numbers. This section also provides for the operation of a vessel in a State other than the one in which it was numbered.
Exhibit 32



(a)  Certification of Quarterly Report by Chief Executive Officer.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GraphOn Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert Dilworth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Robert Dilworth

Robert Dilworth

Chief Executive Officer

May 15, 2006





---



(b)  Certification of Quarterly Report by Chief Financial Officer.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GraphOn Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William Swain, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ William Swain                    ________

William Swain

Chief Financial Officer

May 15, 2006
|                                          |
|------------------------------------------|
|                                          |  |  |  |  |
|                                     |   |   |   |   |
| Delaware                                 |   | 1-9397 |   | 76-0207995 |
| (State of Incorporation)                 |   | (Commission File No.) |   | (I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.) |
|                                     |   |
| 2929 Allen Parkway, Houston, Texas       |   | 77019 |
| (Address of Principal Executive Offices) |   | (Zip Code) |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| ¨ | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| ¨ | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| ¨ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| ¨ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |

----

----

|                         |
|-------------------------|
|                         |  |  |  |  |
|                    |   |   |   |   |
|                    |   | BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED |
|                    |   |   |
| Dated: January 21, 2014 |   | By: |   | /s/ Lee Whitley |
|                    |   |   |   | Lee WhitleyCorporate Secretary and Senior Corporate Counsel |

----

|                   |
|-------------------|
|                   |  |  |
|              |   |   |
| Exhibit No.       |    | Description |
| Exhibit 99.1 |    | News Release of Baker Hughes Incorporated dated January 21, 2014. |
### §1344. Treasury Department: reports

In addition to the usual number of the finance report of the Secretary of the Treasury, one thousand copies for the Senate and two thousand for the House of Representatives shall be printed in addition to those published as part of the departmental report.

In addition to the usual number of the annual report of the Comptroller of the Currency, thirteen thousand copies shall be printed: one thousand for the Senate, two thousand for the House of Representatives, and ten thousand for distribution by the Comptroller of the Currency.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1273.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §295 (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §73, 28 Stat. 616; Mar. 4, 1907, No. 25, 34 Stat. 1425).
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 99.7



         TURBODYNE SELECTS TWO NEW MEMBERS TO THE DISCLOSURE COMMITTEE,
                  RETAINS NEW CORPORATE AND SECURITIES COUNSEL


CARPINTERIA, CA - FEBRUARY 11, 2000 - Turbodyne Technologies Inc. (EASDA:TRBD)
announced today that two new members have been selected to join Turbodyne's
Disclosure Committee. Mr. Irving M. Einhorn and Mr. James L. Sanders, both
located in Los Angeles, California, join Mr. John M. Fedders who continues as a
member.

John M. Fedders, a former Director of Enforcement of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, applied his expertise in later positions at law firms and financial
enterprises to combine government, corporate and legal requirements. Irving M.
Einhorn specializes in securities regulatory and enforcement matters. Earlier,
he served, among other positions, as Branch Chief, Enforcement of the SEC's
Chicago Regional Office and, later, as Regional Administrator of the SEC's Los
Angeles Regional Office. James L. Sanders has more than twenty-four years of
experience in handling securities litigation and is a partner in the Trial
Department of McDermott, Will & Emery. He served as well as Regional
Administrator of the SEC's Los Angeles Regional Office.

Gerhard E. Delf, Turbodyne's President and CEO, commented, "The Board of
Directors and Management are extremely pleased to announce the retention of
individuals of the caliber of John Fedders, Irving Einhorn and James Sanders as
members of the Disclosure Committee. Each of these individuals brings extensive
experience in the disclosure of corporate developments."

Mssrs. Einhorn and Sanders replace Senator Pressler and Charles McCarthy. The
Board of Directors and Management express their appreciation for the efforts of
Mr. McCarthy and Senator Pressler.

In addition, Turbodyne has retained the services of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter &
Hampton LLP, located in Los Angeles, California, as the company's new Corporate
and Securities Counsel.

Turbodyne Technologies Inc., a California based high technology company,
specializes in the development of performance enhancement, fuel economy and
pollution control products for internal combustion engines. Turbodyne
Technologies Inc.'s headquarters is located in Carpinteria, CA; the European
business location is Frankfurt, Germany.

Turbodyne's World  Wide  Web address is: www.turbodyne.com


Contacts:

Corporate Communications, Peter Weichselbraun (800) 566-1130
VP Group Finance - Investor Relations, Ken Fitzpatrick (800) 566-1130
European Business Development, Markus Kumbrink +49-69-975-44-665
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-13-0309 SAT Date: 3/5/2013 Print Date: 8/22/2013

Related cases : Health related cases : Ecotox related cases:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 2

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 2 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: Yes
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: LUNG, IRR, AQUATOX-A,C Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-13-0309 FATE: MW = Liquid with MP < 0 C (M) S = Disp. VP < BP > H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption and possible partial biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = mo Sorption to soils/sediments = strongPBT Potential: P2B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is poor through the skin, moderate through the GI tract, and good through the lungs based on analogs. There is concern lung effects if inhaled and irritation based on the surfactant properties of the PMN material. The PMN material is a nonionic surfactant which means that the eye may be anesthetized and significant irritation may occur before the effect are noticed. Low moderate concern.

Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 9.2 daphnid 48-h LC50 8.4 green algal 96-h EC50 10 fish

_ chronic value 1.8 daphnid

_ chronic value 1.7
algal

_ chronic value 5.4
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for nonionic surfactants; SAR chemical class = MW 720 with 73% < 1000 and 12% < 500; liquid with unknown mp (P); S = dispersible in water at 20 C (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3 and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 170

SARs nonionic surfactants SAR Class
Ecotox Category N onionic Surfactants
Ecotox Factors Comments:
SAT Chair: Becky Jones
#### Norrell *v.*Norrell.

Fish, C. J.

While the husband and wife were living in a bona fide state of separation, she instituted proceedings against him for temporary and permanent alimony for herself and their minor child. Pending the proceedings she executed and delivered to him a receipt which, after a statement of the case she had brought against him and the court in which it was pending, was as follows: “Received of [her husband a described check and several promissory notes, all. aggregating a given amount], the same being in full settlement and -complete discharge of all claims against [her husband] for temporary or permanent alimony of any kind, character, or description, and particularly in discharge of the suit now pending in [a named superior court and assigned for trial on a stated date], in which [the wife] appears as petitioner; the intention of this receipt being to release [her husband] from claims of any kind, character, or description for temporary or permanent alimony, support, or any other obligation, legal or moral, due by [her husband] to [the wife].” *Held,*that, inasmuch as the settlement between the husband and wife, evidenced by the receipt, made no provision for the *65support of their minor child dependent upon her father, such settlement did not operate as a bar to an action afterwards brought against the husband by the wife for temporary alimony or support for the child alone, pending a suit for divorce instituted by the husband against the wife subsequently to such settlement. See Civil Code, § 2980; *Johnson*v. *Johnson,*131 *Ga.*606 (3), 608 (62 S. E. 1044).

April 10, 1912.

Alimony, etc. Before Judge Hammond. Bichmoud superior court. October 7, 1911.

Cited by counsel: Civil Code, §§ 2975, 2980, 2984, 4330, 4336, 5820, 5943; *Ga. R.*136/531; 121/1; 115/950; 114/772; 47/332; 33 *Supp.*99; 8/341; 14 Cyc. 754, 755.

*Henry S. Jones,*for plaintiff in error.

*Pierce Brothers*and *E. G. Kalbfteisch,*contra.

The judge did not err in granting temporary alimony or support to the minor child and awarding her custody to her mother, nor in requiring the husband to pay attorneys’ fees.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
§ 882.412 Subcontracting of owner services. ( a ) *General.* Any Owner may contract with any private or public entity to perform for a fee the services required by the Agreement, Contract or Lease, provided that such contract may not shift any of the Owner's responsibilities or obligations.
( b ) *PHA management.* If the Owner and a PHA wish to enter into a management contract, they may do so provided that: ( 1 ) The Housing Assistance Payments Contract with respect to the housing involved is administered by another PHA, or
( 2 ) Should another PHA not be available and willing to administer the Housing Assistance Payments Contract and no other management alternative exists, the HUD Field Office may authorize PHA management of units administered by the PHA in accordance with specified criteria.
( 3 ) Notwithstanding the provisions of § 882.408 (b) and (c), a PHA may not approve, without prior HUD approval, rents which exceed the appropriate Moderate Rehabilitation Fair Market Rent for a unit for which it provides the management functions under this section.
### §231j. Waiver of annuities

Any person awarded an annuity under this subchapter may decline to accept all or any part of such annuity by a waiver signed and filed with the Board. Such a waiver may be revoked in writing at any time, but no payment of the annuity waived shall be made covering the period during which such waiver was in effect. Such a waiver will have no effect on entitlement to, or the amount of, any other annuity or benefit.

(Aug. 29, 1935, ch. 812, §11, as restated June 24, 1937, ch. 382, pt. I, 50 Stat. 307, as restated Pub. L. 93–445, title I, §101, Oct. 16, 1974, 88 Stat. 1344.)
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re The Commitment of Anthony Bernard Wiley

No. 06

- 18

- 00056

- CV Appeal from the 89th District Court of Wichita County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 186,685

- C ). Opinion delivered by C hief Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess and Justice
Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the judgment of

the court below. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the ca use to

the trial court for a new trial

. We further order that the appell ee , The State of Texas , pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED FEBRUARY 8, 2019
BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### § 401.595 Contract and regulatory provisions.

The provisions of chapter VIII of this title will apply to renewal of a section 8 project-based assistance contract under this part only to the extent, if any, provided in the contract. Part 983 of this title will not apply. The term of the contract renewals under this part will be determined by the appropriate HUD official.

[65 FR 53901, Sept. 6, 2000]