alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43626

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

SUSAN K. MOTTAZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 450

Filed: March 25, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Timothy Hansen, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of eight years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of two years, for felony domestic violence, affirmed. 

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Andrea W. Reynolds, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Jessica M. Lorello, Deputy 

Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM 

Susan K. Mottaz pled guilty to felony domestic violence (prior felony within fifteen 

years). I.C. §§ 18-918(5) and 18-903. The district court sentenced Mottaz to a unified term of 

eight years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years. However, the district court 

retained jurisdiction and sent Mottaz to participate in the rider program. Mottaz appeals.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
2

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Mottaz’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Exhibit
15.2










Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm






We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
F-3 No. 333-127086) of Top Ships Inc. of our report dated February 24, 2006,
with respect to the consolidated  financial  statements of
TOP Tankers Inc. (now know as Top Ships Inc.) for the year
ended  December 31, 2005,  included in Top Ships Inc.'s
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007.




/s/Ernst
& Young


-------------------------




Athens,
Greece


May 21,
2008
### §§616g to 616j. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 616g, Pub. L. 87–589, §1, Aug. 16, 1962, 76 Stat. 388, authorized construction, operation, and maintenance of Mann Creek project, Idaho.

Section 616h, Pub. L. 87–589, §2, Aug. 16, 1962, 76 Stat. 388, related to repayment of construction costs and to costs allocated to irrigation.

Section 616i, Pub. L. 87–589, §3, Aug. 16, 1962, 76 Stat. 389, related to construction, operation, and maintenance of public recreational facilities and conservation and development of fish and wildlife in connection with this project.

Section 616j, Pub. L. 87–589, §4, Aug. 16, 1962, 76 Stat. 389; Pub. L. 89–60, June 30, 1965, 79 Stat. 207, authorized appropriations for this project.
§ 882.401 Eligible properties. ( a ) *Eligible properties.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, housing suitable for moderate rehabilitation as defined in § 882.102 is eligible for inclusion under the Moderate Rehabilitation Program. Existing structures of various types may be appropriate for this program, including single-family houses, multi-family structures and group homes.
( b ) *Ineligible properties.* ( 1 ) Nursing homes, units within the grounds of penal, reformatory, medical, mental and similar public or private institutions, and facilities providing continual psychiatric, medical or nursing services are not eligible for assistance under the Moderate Rehabilitation Program.
( 2 ) Housing owned by a State or unit of general local government is not eligible for assistance under this program.
( 3 ) High rise elevator projects for families with children may not be utilized unless HUD determines there is no practical alternative. (HUD may make this determination for a locality's Moderate Rehabilitation Program in whole or in part and need not review each building on a case-by-case basis.)
( 4 ) Single room occupancy (SRO) housing may not be utilized unless: ( i ) The property is located in an area in which there is a significant demand for such units as determined by the HUD Field Office; and
( ii ) The PHA and the unit of general local government in which the property is located approve of such units being utilized for such purpose.
( 5 ) No Section 8 assistance may be provided with respect to any unit occupied by an Owner; however, cooperatives will be considered as rental housing for purposes of the Moderate Rehabilitation Program.
[63 FR 23854, Apr. 30, 1998, as amended at 64 FR 14832, Mar. 29, 1999]
President Lars Lindgren Vice Presidents Alexander Kirchner

Ekaterina Yordanova

 General Secretary Eduardo Chagas

Brussels, May 23, 2014

The Honorable Anthony Foxx 

Secretary 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Norwegian Air International Limited - Foreign Permit/Exemption - U.S.-EU Open Skies, DOT-OST2013-0204

Dear Secretary Foxx,

On behalf of more than 2.5 million workers of the European Transport Workers’ Federation (EFT), 

representing 243 transport unions and 41 European countries, I would like to bring to your attention a 

resolution which was adopted at an April meeting of the International Transport Workers’ Federation 

(ITF) calling for a full investigation of Norwegian Air International’s (NAI) labor standards and business 

practices. The resolution calls upon the U.S. Department of Transportation, among others, to seek 

additional information about NAI’s plans in order to protect airline labor from the adverse 

consequences of circumventing international labor laws. I have attached a copy of this resolution for 

your records. 

Additionally, I would like to point out that labor representatives are not alone in our concerns. Ketil 

Slovik-Olsen from the Royal Norwegian Ministry of Transport and Communications recently raised his 

concern to the European Commission about the challenges facing European aviation that are created by 

fragmented operations between multiple countries. 

In its response to Minister Solvik-Olsen, the European Commission proposed further discussions at a 

June 2014 Member States Marek Access Committee meeting. 

The European Commission continues to discuss and evaluate whether disparities in immigration rules of 

the Member States pave the way for labor standards in global aviation that are founded on the lowest 

common denominators. Given these very serious and as-yet unresolved issues that pertain directly to 

the NAI application, I urge the Department either to deny NAI’s application outright or defer action until 

questions pertaining to labor standards are thoroughly and properly addressed by all concerned 

stakeholders.

Respectfully,

Eduardo Chagas

General Secretary

enclosures

cc: DOT-OST-2013-0204-0002

Galerie Agora,

Rue du Marché aux Herbes 105, Bte 11

B-1000 Brussels

Telephone +32 2 285 46 60

Fax +32 2 280 08 17

Email: etf@etf-europe.org

www.etf-europe.org

European Transport Workers’ Federation

Fédération Européenne des Travailleurs des Transports

Europäische Transportarbeiter-Föderation

Federación Europea de los Trabajadores del Transporte
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING TIME PURSUANT TO CIV. L.R. 6-2

Case No. CV 09-1484 SI

pa-1408315

KENNETH A. KUWAYTI (CA SBN 145384)

KKuwayti@mofo.com

COLETTE R. VERKUIL (CA SBN 263630)

CVerkuil@mofo.com

CHRISTOPHER L. ROBINSON (CA SBN 

260778)

ChristopherRobinson@mofo.com

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

755 Page Mill Road

Palo Alto, California 94304-1018

Telephone: 650.813.5600

Facsimile: 650.494.0792

Attorneys for Defendants

SORENSON GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC, 

JAMES L. SORENSON, JOSEPH SORENSON, 

and TIMOTHY FENTON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

GEM ACQUISITIONCO, LLC, and GEM 

REALTY FUND IV, L.P.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SORENSON GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC, 

JAMES L. SORENSON, JOSEPH 

SORENSON, TIMOTHY FENTON, and 

DOES 1-25, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. CV 09-1484 SI

[PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING 

TIME PURSUANT TO CIV. L.R. 6-2

This matter comes before the Court on parties’ Stipulated Request for Order Enlarging 

Time Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 6-2. Having considered the arguments and evidence submitted and 

for good cause appearing: 

Case 3:09-cv-01484-SI Document 117 Filed 06/15/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING TIME PURSUANT TO CIV. L.R. 6-2

Case No. CV 09-1484 SI 1

pa-1408315

IT IS SO ORDERED THAT the schedule in this case shall be extended as follows: 

Event Current Date Amended Date

Fact discovery cutoff 06/18/2010 NO CHANGE

Expert disclosures 05/07/2010 NO CHANGE

Rebuttal expert disclosures 06/04/2010 06/25/2010

Expert discovery cutoff 07/01/2010 07/23/2010

Dispositive motions 06/18/2010 NO CHANGE

Oppositions to dispositive motions 07/02/2010 NO CHANGE

Replies to dispositive motions 07/09/2010 NO CHANGE

Dispositive motion hearing 07/23/2010 NO CHANGE

Pretrial conference 08/24/2010 NO CHANGE

Trial 08/30/2010 NO CHANGE

Dated:____________________________ ________________________________

THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-01484-SI Document 117 Filed 06/15/10 Page 2 of 2
#### LEWIS PUB. CO. v. PALMER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

June 22, 1903.)

1. Foreion Corporation—Authority to do Business—Order for Goods— Validity of Contract.

A foreign corporation can recover for goods sold, though when its agent took the order therefor it had not filed any certificate of authority entitling it to do business in the state; such, certificate having been obtained before the order was filled and the goods delivered.

¶ 1. See Corporations, vol. 12, Cent. Dig. § 2545.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District.

Action by the Lewis Publishing Company against William H. Palmer. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and GILDERSLEEVE and MacLEAN, JJ.

Henry C. Hunter, for appellant.

Metcalf B. Hatch, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This action was brought to recover the agreed price for a work called the “History of Long Island,” and for a steel engraving of the defendant with impressions inserted in such work. The plaintiff is an Illinois corporation, and its agent took the order for the work done for the defendant in 1900, and prior to the plaintiff’s filing any certificate of authority entitling it to do business in this state. The order was not filed and the goods delivered until after such certificate was obtained. If it is to be held that the contract between the parties was completed when the order was taken, the decision in The Neuchatel Asphalte Co. v. Mayor, etc., of New York, 155 N. Y. 373, 49 N. E. 1043, defeats the claim of the defendant that the contract cannot be enforced; and, if the contract was not complete until delivery, the plaintiff had then complied with the law. In either view of the case, judgment for the plaintiff was correct.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
§ 401.503 Access to information. ( a ) *PAE responsibilities.* The PAE must provide to parties entitled to notice under § 401.501 access to information obtained by the PAE about the project and its management if the PAE determines that such information is reasonably likely to contribute to effective participation by those parties in the restructuring process, or if HUD requires the PAE to provide access to the information. The PAE is not required to make public any information received from the owner or manager that the PAE reasonably characterizes as confidential or proprietary information that would not ordinarily be made public, except: ( 1 ) Owner evaluation of physical condition (OEPC), or a comprehensive needs assessment (CA) if used instead of an OEPC, as required by § 401.450;
( 2 ) Owner-prepared 1-year project rent analysis; and
( 3 ) As directed by HUD.
( b ) *Information on expenses and profit/loss.* Before disclosing any information, the PAE must remove any information obtained by the PAE directly from the owner or project manager that is related to project expenses, property valuation, or profit and loss, unless the owner gives written consent to disclosure with that information.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3130 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 3130

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 30, 2005

                                Received

                              July 1, 2005

       Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 Making supplemental appropriations for fiscal year 2005 for veterans 
                           medical services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the following sums 
are appropriated, out of any
money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for fiscal year 2005:

                     DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

                     Veterans Health Administration

                            medical services

    For an additional amount for ``Medical Services'', $975,000,000, to 
remain available until September 30, 2006.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 30, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 31
                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Moshe Zarmi, certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Thinking Tools,
Inc.;

2.      Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report; and

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

Dated: February 12, 2004
                                                  By: Moshe Zarmi
                                                      ------------------------
                                                  Name:  Moshe Zarmi
                                                  Title: President and Chief
                                                         Executive Officer and
                                                         principal accounting
                                                         officer
#### § 882.510 Adjustment of utility allowance.

The PHA must determine, at least annually, whether an adjustment is required in the Utility Allowance applicable to the dwelling units in the Program, on grounds of changes in utility rates or other change of general applicability to all units in the Program. The PHA may also establish a separate schedule of allowances for each building of 20 or more assisted units, based upon at least one year's actual utility consumption data following rehabilitation under the Program. If the PHA determines that an adjustment should be made in its Schedule of Allowances or if it establishes a separate schedule for a building which will change the allowance, the PHA must then determine the amounts of adjustments to be made in the amount of rent to be paid by affected Families and the amount of housing assistance payments and must notify the Owners and Families accordingly. Any adjustment to the Allowance must be implemented no later than at the Family's next reexamination or at lease renewal, whichever is earlier.

[47 FR 34383, Aug. 9, 1982, as amended at 49 FR 19946, May 10, 1984]
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Home City Financial Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations, and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods
presented in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report
(the Evaluation Date); andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent
fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent valuation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer s
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    Any significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial
information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.
 August 10, 2006
    
    /s/ Charles A. Mihal

Charles A. MihalSecretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
  22
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 22, 2016

NO. 03

- 16

- 00077

- CV

Phil Wilson, in his official capacity as general manager of the Lower Colorado River Authority; and Timothy Timmerman; Thomas Michael Martine; J. Scott Arbuckle;

Steve K. Balas; Lori A. Berger; Joseph M. Crane; Pamela Jo Ellison; John M. Franklin; Raymond A. Gill, Jr.; Charles B. Johnson; Sandra Wright Kibby; Robert Lewis; George W. Russell; Franklin Scott Spears, Jr.; and Martha Leigh M. Whitten;

in their official capacities as members of the board of directors of the

Lower Colorado River Authority, Appellants

v.

New Braunfels Utilities, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, G OODWIN, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signe d by the tr i a l court on January 22, 2016.

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no

reversible error in the trial court’s interlocutory order . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial

court’s interlocutory ord er

. The appellant s shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this

Court and in the court below.
### Part J—Measurement of Vessels

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Part J contains provisions that apply to the measurement of a vessel to determine its tonnage. Tonnage is a measurement of a vessel's volume and is used for international, customs, and regulatory purposes. This part implements the 1969 International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships and provides a framework for phasing in the international system as the method of measuring ships domestically, to establish uniformity in ship measurement. The availability of an alternate domestic regulatory system of measurement is continued so that the application of domestic laws will be preserved in order that vessels engaged in domestic commerce will not be adversely affected.