alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 318 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 318

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 16, 2005

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and 
 feasibility of designating Castle Nugent Farms located on St. Croix, 
 Virgin Islands, as a unit of the National Park System, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE STUDY REGARDING CASTLE NUGENT FARMS.

    (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
            (1) Castle Nugent Farms, located on the southeastern shore 
        of St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands, is the largest parcel of 
        privately-held land in the Virgin Islands and has been an 
        operating cattle ranch for 50 years.
            (2) This land has the largest and healthiest fringing coral 
        reef anywhere in the Virgin Islands.
            (3) It consists of Caribbean dry forest and pasturelands 
        with considerable cultural resources including both pre-
        Columbian and post-European settlement.
            (4) Castle Nugent Farms contains a large historic 17th 
        century Danish estate house that sits on over 4 miles of 
        pristine Caribbean oceanfront property.
            (5) In addition to being an area for turtle nesting and 
        night heron nesting, it is the home for the Senepol cattle 
        breed, a unique breed of cattle that was developed on St. Croix 
        in the early 1900's to adapt to the island's climate.
    (b) Study.--The Secretary of the Interior shall carry out a study 
regarding the suitability and feasibility of designating Castle Nugent 
Farms as a unit of the National Park System.
    (c) Study Process and Completion.--Section 8(c) of Public Law 91-
383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-5(c)) shall apply to the conduct and completion of 
the study required by this section.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 15, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### § 35.300 Purpose and applicability.

The purpose of this subpart D is to establish procedures to eliminate as far as practicable lead-based paint hazards in a residential property that receives more than $5,000 annually per project in project-based assistance on or after September 15, 2000, under a program administered by a Federal agency other than HUD.
EXHIBIT 99.1 -- Servicer's Annual Statement of Compliance

[Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. logo]





RE: Officer's Certificate 2004 Annual Reporting



The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the 2004
fiscal year:

(A)  I have reviewed the activities and performance of the Servicer
     during the preceding fiscal year under the terms of the
     Servicing Agreement, Trust Agreement, Pooling and Servicing
     Agreement and/or Seller/Servicer Guide and to the best of
     these Officers' knowledge, the Servicer has fulfilled all of
     its duties, responsibilities or obligations under these
     Agreements throughout such year, or if there has been a
     default or failure of the servicer to perform any of such
     duties, responsibilities or obligations, a description of
     each default or failure and the nature and status thereof has
     been reported.

(B)  I have confirmed that the Servicer is currently an approved
     FNMA or FHLMC servicer in good standing;

(C)  I have confirmed that the Fidelity Bond, the Errors and
     Omissions Insurance Policy and any other bonds required
     under the terms of the Servicing Agreement, Trust
     Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Seller/
     Servicer Guide are in full force and effect;

(D)  All premiums for each Hazard Insurance Policy, Flood
     Insurance Policy (if applicable) and Primary Mortgage
     Insurance Policy (if applicable), with respect to each
     Mortgaged Property, have been paid and that all such
     insurance policies are in full force and effect;

(E)  All real estate taxes, governmental assessments and any other
     expenses accrued and due, that if not paid could result in
     a lien or encumbrance on any Mortgaged Property, have been
     paid, or if any such costs or expenses have not been paid
     with respect to any Mortgaged Property, the reason for the
     non-payment has been reported.

(F)  All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly
     funded; and

(G)  All annual reports of Foreclosure and Abandonment of Mortgage
     Property required per section 6050H, 6050J and 6050P of the
     Internal Revenue Code, respectively, have been prepared and
     filed.


Certified by:

/s/ David Dill
Officer: David Dill

/s/ President
Title: President

/s/ 3-21-05
Date



We are a debt collector.  Any information obtained will be used
for that purpose.


Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc.
4708 Mercantile Drive North
Fort Worth, TX 76137-3605

P.O. Box 161489
Forth Worth, TX 76161-1489
(817) 665-7200
Fax (817) 665-7400
§ 8.12 Employment criteria. ( a ) A recipient may not use any employment test or other selection criterion that screens out or tends to screen out individuals with handicaps or any class of individuals with handicaps unless: ( 1 ) The recipient demonstrates that the test score or other selection criterion, as used by the recipient, is job-related for the position in question; and
( 2 ) The appropriate HUD official demonstrates that alternative job-related tests or criteria that tend to screen out fewer individuals with handicaps are unavailable.
( b ) A recipient shall select and administer tests concerning employment to ensure that, when administered to an applicant or employee who has a handicap that impairs sensory, manual, or speaking skills, the test results accurately reflect the applicant's or employee's job skills, aptitude, or whatever other factor the test purports to measure, rather than the applicant's or employee's impaired sensory, manual, or speaking skills (except where those skills are the factors that the test purports to measure).
### §672. Repealed. Dec. 16, 1930, ch. 14, §1, 46 Stat. 1029

Section, R.S. §2353, required public lands, offered at public sale, to be offered in half quarter sections.
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MOODY WOODROW TANKSLEY,

Plaintiff,

v.

CDC; et al.,

Defendants.                                                             /

No. C 09-2621 MHP (pr)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Moody Tanksley, currently incarcerated at the Atascadero State Hospital, filed a pro

se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 concerning conditions of confinement at

Salinas Valley State Prison, where he was housed earlier.  The court reviewed the complaint,

found that it failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and had numerous other

deficiencies, and ordered Tanksley to file an amended complaint by April 9, 2010.   The

deadline has long passed and Tanksley did not file the required amended complaint. 

Accordingly, this action is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted.  The clerk shall close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 28, 2010 ______________________ Marilyn Hall Patel

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02621-MHP   Document 13   Filed 07/28/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-09T01:04:16-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,084,075
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          99,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,262,497
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 12,087,877
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     22,883,077
<ALLOWANCE>                                    263,243
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,216,237
<DEPOSITS>                                  32,998,188
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            296,888
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,913,161
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              41,216,237
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                963,263
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              320,942
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                81,419
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,365,624
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             667,254
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             667,254
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          698,370
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   73,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              15,950
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                536,473
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                210,080
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     173,848
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   173,848
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.13
<LOANS-NON>                                     30,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               215,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   25,000
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              263,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           263,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### Anthony Tuffarella, Plaintiff, v. Erie Railroad Company, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Star Corrugated Box Company, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Motion by Star Corrugated Box Company, third-party defendant-respondent, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND SUCH IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           11870
<SECURITIES>                                     59900
<RECEIVABLES>                                   122190<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     564910
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                806690
<PP&E>                                          355830<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1211690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           266090
<BONDS>                                         200000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      485360
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1211690
<SALES>                                        1450870
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1450870
<CGS>                                          1075610
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1075610
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 10830
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               32800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  72130
<INCOME-TAX>                                    241600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              47970
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (11620)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     36350
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables and property and equipment are presented net of allowances for
doubtful accounts and accumulated depreciation and amortization, respectively.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 882.802 Definitions. In addition to the definitions set forth in 24 CFR part 5 and § 882.102 (except for the definition of “*Single Room Occupancy (SRO) Housing*” therein) the following will apply: *Agreement to enter into housing assistance payments contract (Agreement).* A written agreement between the owner and the HA that, upon satisfactory completion of the rehabilitation in accordance with requirements specified in the Agreement, the HA will enter into a housing assistance payments contract with the owner.
*Applicant.* A public housing agency or Indian housing authority (collectively referred to as HAs), or a private nonprofit organization that applies for assistance under this program. HUD will require private nonprofit applicants to subcontract with public housing agencies to administer their rental assistance.
*Covered housing provider.* For the Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation Single Room Occupancy Program for Homeless Individuals, “covered housing provider,” as such term is used in HUD's regulations in 24 CFR part 5, subpart L (Protection for Victims of Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, or Stalking), refers to the owner.
*Eligible individual (“individual”).* An individual who is capable of independent living and is authorized for admission to assisted housing under 24 CFR part 5.
*Homeless individual.* An individual as described in section 103 of the McKinney Act (42 U.S.C. 11302).
*McKinney Act.* The Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11301 *et seq.*).
*Moderate rehabilitation.* Rehabilitation involving a minimum expenditure of $3,000 for a unit, including its prorated share of work to be accomplished on common areas or systems, to upgrade to decent, safe, and sanitary condition to comply with the Housing Quality Standards or other standards approved by HUD, from a condition below those standards (improvements being of a modest nature and other than routine maintenance).
*Private nonprofit organization.* An organization, no part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any member, founder, contributor, or individual. The organization must: ( 1 ) Have a voluntary board;
( 2 ) Have a functioning accounting system that is operated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or designate an entity that will maintain a functioning accounting system for the organization in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; and
( 3 ) Practice nondiscrimination in the provision of assistance.
*Single room occupancy (SRO) housing.* A unit for occupancy by one person, which need not but may contain food preparation, sanitary facilities, or both.
*Statement of individual responsibility.* An agreement, in the form prescribed by HUD, between the HA and an individual to be assisted under the program, stating the obligations and responsibilities of the two parties.
[61 FR 48057, Sept. 11, 1996, as amended at 63 FR 23855, Apr. 30, 1998; 81 FR 80812, Nov. 16, 2016]
#### § 58.56 Scoping process.

The determination on whether or not to hold a scoping meeting will depend on the same circumstances and factors as for the holding of public hearings under § 58.59. The responsible entity must wait at least 15 days after disseminating or publishing the NOI/EIS before holding a scoping meeting.
§ 248.121 Annual authorized return and aggregate preservation rents. ( a ) *Annual authorized return.* For each eligible low income housing project appraised under § 248.111, the Commissioner shall set an annual authorized return on the project equal to 8 percent of the extension preservation equity.
( b ) *Aggregate preservation rents.* For each eligible low income housing project appraised under § 248.111, the Commissioner shall also determine the aggregate preservation rents. The aggregate preservation rents shall be used solely for the purposes of comparison with the Federal cost limit under § 248.123. Actual rents received by the owner (or a qualified purchaser) shall be determined pursuant to §§ 248.153, 248.157, and 248.161.
( c ) *Extension preservation rent.* The extension preservation rent shall be the gross potential income for the project, as determined by the Commissioner, that would be required to support— ( 1 ) The annual authorized return determined under paragraph (a) of this section;
( 2 ) Debt service on any rehabilitation loan for the project, assuming a market rate of interest and customary terms;
( 3 ) Debt service on the federally-assisted mortgage(s) for the project;
( 4 ) Project operating expenses as determined by the Commissioner; and
( 5 ) Adequate reserves.
( d ) *Transfer preservation rent.* The transfer preservation rent shall be the gross potential income for the project, as determined by the Commissioner, that would be required to support— ( 1 ) Debt service on the loan for acquisition of the project;
( 2 ) Debt service on any rehabilitation loan for the project, assuming a market rate of interest and customary terms;
( 3 ) Debt service on the federally-assisted mortgage(s) for the project;
( 4 ) Project operating expenses as determined by the Commissioner; and
( 5 ) Adequate reserves.
( e ) *Adequate reserves and operating expenses.* For purposes of this section— ( 1 ) Adequate reserves are the amount of funds which, when added to existing reserves, are sufficient to maintain the project, including needed deferred maintenance, at a level that meets the standards set forth in § 248.147; and
( 2 ) Project operating expenses shall be based on operating expenses for the preceding 3 years, adjusted for reasonable reductions in operating costs due to rehabilitation and energy improvements. For purposes of comparison to the gross rents used in determining the Federal cost limit, project operating expenses shall include the cost of utilities paid by the residents.
( f ) *Debt service.* For purposes of this section, the amount of debt service for an acquisition loan will be estimated based on the maximum loan to which the purchaser is entitled under § 241.1067 of this chapter. The debt service on any rehabilitation loan will be estimated using costs derived from the appraisals conducted under § 248.111, taking into account any funds provided for rehabilitation by State or local governments and assuming market rate interest rates.
§ 905.802 HUD review of PHA performance. ( a ) *HUD determination.* HUD shall review the PHA's performance in completing work in accordance with this part. HUD may make such other reviews when and as it determines necessary. When conducting such a review, HUD shall, at minimum, make the following determinations: ( 1 ) HUD shall determine whether the PHA has carried out its activities under this part in a timely manner and in accordance with its CFP 5-Year Action Plan and other applicable requirements.
( 2 ) HUD shall determine whether the PHA has a continuing capacity to carry out its Capital Fund activities in a timely manner.
( 3 ) HUD shall determine whether the PHA has accurately reported its obligation and expenditures in a timely manner.
( 4 ) HUD shall determine whether the PHA has accurately reported required building and unit data for the calculation of the formula.
( 5 ) HUD shall determine whether the PHA has obtained approval for any CFFP or OFFP proposal and any PHA development proposal.
( b ) [Reserved]
§ 887.109 Housing assistance and total tenant payments and increases in family income. ( a ) *Housing assistance payment.* The housing assistance payment for an eligible family participating in the FSS program under this part is determined in accordance with the regulations set forth in § 5.661(e) of this title.
( b ) *Total tenant payment.* The total tenant payment for an FSS family participating in the FSS program is determined in accordance with § 5.628 of this title.
( c ) *Increases in FSS family income.* Any increase in the earned income of an FSS family during its participation in an FSS program may not be considered as income or an asset for purposes of eligibility of the FSS family for other benefits, or amount of benefits payable to the FSS family, under any other program administered by HUD.
|                                          |
|------------------------------------------|
|                                          |  |  |  |  |
|                                     |   |   |   |   |
| Delaware                                 |   | 1-9397 |   | 76-0207995 |
| (State of Incorporation)                 |   | (Commission File No.) |   | (I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.) |
|                                     |   |
| 2929 Allen Parkway, Houston, Texas       |   | 77019 |
| (Address of Principal Executive Offices) |   | (Zip Code) |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| ¨ | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| ¨ | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| ¨ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| ¨ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |

----

----

|                         |
|-------------------------|
|                         |  |  |  |  |
|                    |   |   |   |   |
|                    |   | BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED |
|                    |   |   |
| Dated: January 10, 2014 |   | By: |   | /s/ Lee Whitley |
|                    |   |   |   | Lee WhitleyCorporate Secretary |

----

|                   |
|-------------------|
|                   |  |  |
|              |   |   |
| Exhibit No.       |    | Description |
| Exhibit 99.1 |    | News Release of Baker Hughes Incorporated dated January 10, 2014. |