alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAMELA LEE,

Plaintiff,

 v.

KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN

LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN,

Defendant. /

No. C 09-02176 SI

ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE AND CONTINUING

HEARING ON MOTIONS FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

[Docket No. 30]

Defendant has filed a motion seeking extension of the briefing schedule and continuance of the

hearing date on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff does not oppose an

extension, but expresses concern that the discovery process will not proceed smoothly in the intervening

time without guidelines from the Court.

Accordingly, the Court hereby rules as follows:

1. The current briefing schedule and hearing date for the parties’ cross-motions for

summary judgment are hereby VACATED. Oral argument on the parties’ crossmotions for summary judgment will be heard on Friday, June 25, 2010, and the

briefing schedule is extended accordingly. 

2. Defendant must respond to all discovery propounded by plaintiff within 20 days. In the

event defendant asserts an objection, the parties must meet and confer to resolve their

dispute, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 and Local Rule 37. If the parties are unable to

resolve their dispute after good faith efforts to do so, plaintiff may file a motion to

Case 3:09-cv-02176-JW Document 35 Filed 02/01/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

compel in compliance with the Local Rules and the Court’s standing order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 1, 2010 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02176-JW Document 35 Filed 02/01/10 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3222 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3222

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,6-Dichloro aniline.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 2005

  Mr. Buyer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,6-Dichloro aniline.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2,6-DICHLORO ANILINE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.29.17 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 2,6-Dichloro aniline) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# FAA UAS Civil COA Request Any information that is provided Is bound by the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and may be releasable. This requires compliance 

### to FOIA and consent 

### to the release of your information. Ifyou do not consent 

### to the release of your Information , you must contact us for further guidance. For more information, please visit http://www.foia.gov/. Date 

### KJ6!18/2015 333 Exemption 

### # or Federal Register Docket 

### # 

## Proponent Information Contact Name lAIIen VanNoppen Company Name Street Address 

### 1 110 8 Valdese Ave Street Address 

### 2 City ! Morganton State I N c 

# C:l Z i p Code Phone Number

### ~28-413**7**466 E-mail Address

### ~llen@vannop**~e n.co**  

## Aircraft System Aircraft Type Aircraft Registration I DJ I - Phantom 3 drone I none Perfonnance Characteristics Climb Rate (Feet/Minute)

Tum Rate (Degrees/Second) Cruise Max Speed Gross Takeoff Weight !7oo

## ~5 pomph 

### 11 200 g 

## Operational Information Location 

### @8655

Descent Rate (Feet/Minute)

Approach Speed Min Launch/Recovery poo

kmph 

### 1 1 m ph 

### 1 1200 g

Altitude



# "' 11 220 - 1620 Distance from 

# !1 m i le nearest Town/City c:....;.;.;.;.;.:.._____ _, Description of Operation V i deo and still photog raphy of n a tur

e sce nes Ope rat i on Area in vicin i ty of 

### 35 .748326, - 81.700196

Operations Area (Attach VFR Chart with Coordinates) Class of Airspace O A 

# 0 Under Mode C Veil O D

### G Flight Conditions**VFR** 

## 0 IFR 

## Air Traffic Communication 0 VHF

0 UHF 

## Procedures Transmitter OYes ®No

Transmitter OYes ®No
Lost Link Procedures 

### 1. How long to activate LL procedure


### 3. Lost Link Route t' re ct l a unch point 

### 5. Flight Termination Point !launch po i nt Lost Communication Procedures 

## 0 B (Requires FAA HQ approval) 

# oc**~E** 

## 0 G (With an operational ATC Tower)

Receiver OYes ®No

Receiver OYes ®No Guard (Emergency Frequency) OYes ®No

Guard (Emergency Frequency) OYes ®No



### 2. LLAititude ll es s than 

### 400 ' AGL 

### 4. Lost Link Point rrect launch point



### 1 . Between Pilot and Air Traffic Control NA



### 2. Between Pilot and Observer 

# 'CI verba l



## Observer Line of Sight of Observer**Yes** 

## 0 Other ll ine of sight if ope rato r Time of Day Transponder ®Day OYes 0No 

## ® N/A 

## 0 Night 

## 0 Both ModeC 

## 0

Please return completed fonn to 9·AJV·115·UASOrganization@faa.gov.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 21, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 51695-51696]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20414]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 770

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2012-0018; FRL-9397-2]
RIN 2070-AJ92

Formaldehyde Emissions Standards for Composite Wood Products; 
Extension of Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA issued a proposed rule in the Federal Register of June 10, 
2013, concerning formaldehyde emissions standards for composite wood 
products. After receiving requests for an extension, EPA extended the 
comment period from August 9, 2013, to September 9, 2013. EPA received 
additional comments and believes it is appropriate to further extend 
the comment period in order to give

[[Page 51696]]

stakeholders additional time to assess the impacts of the proposal, 
review technical documents in the docket, and prepare comments. This 
document extends the comment period from September 9, 2013, to October 
9, 2013.

DATES: Comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA-
HQ-OPPT-2012-0018, must be received on or before October 9, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed instructions as provided under ADDRESSES 
in the Federal Register document of June 10, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information contact: 
Cindy Wheeler, National Program Chemicals Division (7404T), Office of 
Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: 
(202) 566-0484; email address: wheeler.cindy@epa.gov.
    For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202) 
554-1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    This document extends the public comment period established in the 
Federal Register of July 23, 2013 (78 FR 44089) (FRL-9394-1). EPA is 
hereby extending the comment period, which was set to end on September 
9, 2013, to October 9, 2013.
    To submit comments, or access the docket, please follow the 
detailed instructions as provided under ADDRESSES in the June 10, 2013 
(78 FR 34820) (FRL-9342-3), Federal Register document. If you have 
questions, consult the technical person listed under FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 770

    Environmental protection, Formaldehyde, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Toxic substances, Wood.

    Dated: August 15, 2013.
Louise P. Wise,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution 
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2013-20414 Filed 8-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 10, 2020.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 27, 2020, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Parcel Select Contract 38 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2021-31, CP2021-32.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2020-27072 Filed 12-9-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Oplink Communications, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ Shirley YinShirley YinChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
### §7306. General requirements and classifications for able seamen

(a) To qualify for an endorsement as able seaman authorized by this section, an applicant must provide satisfactory proof that the applicant—

(1) is at least 18 years of age;

(2) has the service required by the applicable section of this part;

(3) is qualified professionally as demonstrated by an applicable examination or educational requirements; and

(4) is qualified as to sight, hearing, and physical condition to perform the seaman's duties.

(b) The classifications authorized for endorsement as able seaman are the following:

(1) able seaman—unlimited.

(2) able seaman—limited.

(3) able seaman—special.

(4) able seaman—offshore supply vessels.

(5) able seaman—sail.

(6) able seaman—fishing industry.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 542; Pub. L. 98–364, title IV, §402(9)(C), July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 448.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 7306 | 46:672(b) |

Section 7306(a) establishes the minimum requirements an individual must meet before being issued a merchant mariner's document endorsed for able seamen.

Subsection (b) establishes the classifications of able seamen—unlimited, able seamen—limited, able seamen—special, able seamen—offshore supply vessels, and able seamen—sail.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Subsec. (b)(6). Pub. L. 98–364 added par. (6).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Provisions of this section (related to able seaman—sail) effective Apr. 15, 1984, see section 2(g)(1) of Pub. L. 98–89, set out as a note under section 3101 of this title.

#### Acceptance of Certain Services Toward Endorsement as Able Seaman

Pub. L. 101–595, title VI, §602(e)(3), Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2992, provided that: "For the purposes of chapter 73 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation shall accept the service used by an individual to qualify for an endorsement as able seaman—fishing industry as qualifying service toward an endorsement as an able seaman—

"(A) under sections 7307 and 7309 of that title; or

"(B) if the service is on board a vessel of at least 100 gross tons, under section 7308 of that title."
### §1709. Blank forms: printing and sale to public

The Director of the Government Publishing Office may print for sale by the Superintendent of Documents to the public, upon prepayment, additional copies of approved Government blank forms.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1280; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(c)(1), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §94 (June 7, 1924, ch. 303, §1, 43 Stat. 592).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–235 substituted "Director of the Government Publishing Office" for "Public Printer".
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1803

FRANKLIN D. STEVENSON,

Petitioner,

v.

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS; ISLAND

CREEK COAL COMPANY,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(06-0799-BLA)

Submitted: March 31, 2008 Decided: April 17, 2008

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Franklin D. Stevenson, Petitioner Pro Se. Patricia May Nece, UNITED

STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.; Mary Rich Maloy,

Douglas Allan Smoot, JACKSON & KELLY, PLLC, Charleston, West

Virginia; Kathy Lynn Snyder, JACKSON & KELLY, PLLC, Morgantown,

West Virginia, for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Franklin D. Stevenson seeks to appeal the Benefits Review

Board’s order affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s decision and

order on remand denying Stevenson’s application for black lung

benefits. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because

the petition for review was not timely filed. 

In a black lung benefits case, a party seeking review of

a decision and order issued by the Board must file a petition for

review in the court of appeals within sixty days after the order is

issued. 33 U.S.C. § 921(c) (2000). The sixty-day period for

seeking review is jurisdictional, and a petition for review must be

filed with the clerk of this court to stop the running of this

period. Adkins v. Dir., Office of Workers’ Comp. Programs, 889

F.2d 1360, 1363 (4th Cir. 1989). “[T]he sixty day filing period

begins to run with the filing of a Board opinion with the Clerk of

the Board.” Mining Energy, Inc. v. Dir., Office of Workers’ Comp.

Programs, 391 F.3d 571, 575-76 (4th Cir. 2004). 

In this case, the Board’s decision was issued and served

on the parties on June 15, 2007. Stevenson’s petition for review

was not filed until August 17, 2007, three days after the appeal

period expired. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
#### MEYERS v. LIEBESKIND.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 17, 1905.)

Action by Leon S. Meyers against Leon A. Liebeskind. No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs.
Exhibit 4.1



THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


240 Greenwich
Street, 22W Floor, New York, NY 10286


 


 


 


November 4, 2022


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


SmartTrust 590 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York Mellon
is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trusts (the “Trusts”) included in the Registration
Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trusts on the date hereof. The prices indicated
therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on November 3, 2022, in accordance with the valuation method
set forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreements. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New
York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-266864) filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the Units of the Trusts and to the filing of this
consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/  Margarita
Kalantarova 


Margarita Kalantarova


Vice President
Exhibit 32.1











Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and principal financial and accounting officer








In  connection  with the  accompanying  Annual  Report on Form 10-K/A of  INTREorg Systems,  Inc.  for the year  ended  December  31,  2009,  I,  Russell  K. Boyd, President,  Chief Executive Officer,  principal  executive officer and principal


financial and accounting  fficer of INTREorg  Systems,  Inc.,  hereby certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:





a)   such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of INTREorg Systems, Inc. for the year ended  December 31, 2009,  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





b)   the  information  contained  in such  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K/A of INTREorg  Systems,  Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009,  fairly presents,  in all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of INTREorg Systems, InC.








Date: December 24, 2010





/s/ Russell K. Boyd


Russell K. Boyd, President


Chief Operating Officer,


(principal executive officer and


principal financial and accounting officer)














This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
From: Michael T Hoyhtya/PW/Hennepin To: Michael L Risse/PW/Hennepin@Hennepin

Date: 04/11/2012 12:57 PM Subject: Re: update on PFOS

Twin City Chromium Plating Co

- They don't do chrome electroplating anymore. It's been several years since they stopped. They just keep chromium as part of their name.

NICO

- I ask the questions, but the contact knows very little about PFOS and provided little feedback. On Monday I spoke with the contact again to follow up with PFOS questions, but they don't seem too intere sted in providing feedback.

The little information I did get is Yes, they do use PFOS surfactants for their chrome electroplating process. I recall they maintain a surface

tension of 37

- 38 dyne/cm. They said they get issues when the surface tension is gre ater and lower than

37

- 38 dynes. They are also using non

- PFOS products but I don't have any further information to report.

Michael Hoyhtya, CHMM

Senior Environmentalist

Hennepin County Department of Environmental Services

Commercial Hazardous Waste Unit 701 Fourth Ave S, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55415

- 1600

Phone: (612) 348

- 2556 Fax: (612) 348

- 8532

Forms, factsheets and other resources found at: www.hennepin.us/hwgenerators

From: Michael L Risse/PW/H ennepin To: Michael T Hoyhtya/PW/Hennepin@Hennepin, Matthew C Petersen/PW/Hennepin@Hennepin, michael.s.wilson@co.hennepin.mn.us

Date: 04/09/2012 09:51 AM Subject: update on PFOS

Can you give me a qu ick update on what you've found so far on you PFOS inspections?

agend item for next metro meeting:

1. Tanya Maurice: Responses to the EPA’s query on how well non

- PFOS surfactants are working for platers (related to the EPA’s chrome NESHAP rules).Mike Risse, CHMM

Environmental Protection Division Hennepin County 701 4th Avenue South, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55415

- 1600 phone: 612/348

- 5790

fax: 612/348

- 8532 mike.risse@co.hennepin.mn.us

Go to http://www.hennepin.us/hwgenerators for forms, fact sheets, and other useful information on

business hazardous waste.

Disclaimer: Information in this message or an attachment may be government data and thereby s ubject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may be subject to
attorney

- client or work product privilege, may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise protected, and the unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other use or disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your comp uter system.