alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Home City Financial Corporation, (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
we, J. William Stapleton, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer,
and Charles A. Mihal, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/J. William Stapleton                /s/Charles A. Mihal
----------------------------------     -----------------------------
J. William Stapleton                   Charles A. Mihal
Chief Executive Officer and            Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Chief Operating Officer


Date:     May  9, 2003                 Date:   May 9, 2003
      -----------------------------          -------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Home City Financial Corporation and will be retained by Home City
Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.






                                       23
### §3302. Regulations covering lists of records for disposal, procedure for disposal, and standards for reproduction

The Archivist shall promulgate regulations, not inconsistent with this chapter, establishing—

(1) procedures for the compiling and submitting to the Archivist of lists and schedules of records proposed for disposal,

(2) procedures for the disposal of records authorized for disposal, and

(3) standards for the reproduction of records by photographic, microphotographic, or digital processes with a view to the disposal of the original records.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1299; Pub. L. 94–575, §4(c)(1), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2727; Pub. L. 98–497, title I, §107(b)(23), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2290; Pub. L. 113–187, §§5(b), 8(12), Nov. 26, 2014, 128 Stat. 2010, 2012.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §367 (July 7, 1943, ch. 192, §2, 57 Stat. 381; June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title I, §104, 63 Stat. 381).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Par. (1). Pub. L. 113–187, §8(12), substituted "the Archivist" for "him".

Par. (3). Pub. L. 113–187, §5(b), substituted "photographic, microphotographic, or digital processes" for "photographic or microphotographic processes".

1984—Pub. L. 98–497 substituted "Archivist" for "Administrator of General Services".

1976—Pub. L. 94–575 struck out "; approval by President" after "standards for reproduction" in section catchline.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–497 effective Apr. 1, 1985, see section 301 of Pub. L. 98–497, set out as a note under section 2102 of this title.
Exhibit 13.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The9 Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jun Zhu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 30, 2006

By:
/s/ Jun Zhu

Name: Jun Zhu

Title: Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FIRE INNOVATIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff(s),

V.

RIT RESCUE & ESCAPE SYSTEMS,

INC.,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C09-1703 BZ

STAY ORDER

Following a telephone conference at which both parties

were represented by counsel IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. This matter is STAYED pending further order of the

Court. Specifically, this means that the hearing presently

scheduled for June 2, 2010 on defendant’s motion to dismiss 

is VACATED, subject to being rescheduled should this case 

not settle. A new briefing schedule will issue at that time.

2. Plaintiff’s request for leave to file a motion to

compel discovery will be reconsidered if the case does not

settle. In the interim, the parties are directed to

Case 3:09-cv-01703-BZ Document 64 Filed 05/07/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

informally exchange sufficient information under Rule 408 to

enable each side to properly evaluate this case for settlement

purposes. 

3. The settlement conference presently scheduled for

July 22, 2010 before Judge Chen is rescheduled for Thursday,

May 27, 2010 at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom C, 15th Flr. 

Settlement conference statements shall be lodged with Judge

Chen’s chambers no later than May, 13, 2010. Judge Chen’s

previous Settlement Conference Order otherwise remains in full

force and effect. 

Dated: May 7, 2010 

 Bernard Zimmerman

 United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\FIRE INNOVATIONS V. RIT RESCUE\STAY ORDER.wpd

Case 3:09-cv-01703-BZ Document 64 Filed 05/07/10 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 28, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77832-77833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28347]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Financial Management Service; Application and Renewal Fees 
Imposed on Surety Companies and Reinsuring Companies; Increase in Fees 
Imposed

SUMMARY: Effective December 31, 2004, The Department of the Treasury, 
Financial Management Service, is increasing the fees it imposes on and 
collects from surety companies and reinsuring companies.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6765.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The fees imposed and collected, as referred 
to in 31 CFR 223.22, cover the costs incurred by the Government for 
services performed relative to qualifying corporate sureties to write 
Federal business. These fees are determined in accordance with the 
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-25, as amended. The change 
in fees is the result of a thorough analysis of costs associated with 
the Surety Bond Branch.

[[Page 77833]]

    The new fee rate schedule is as follows:
    (1) Examination of a company's application for a Certificate of 
Authority as an acceptable surety or as an acceptable reinsuring 
company on Federal bonds--$6,800.
    (2) Determination of a company's continued qualification for annual 
renewal of its Certificate of Authority--$4,000.
    (3) Examination of a company's application for recognition as an 
Admitted Reinsurer (except on excess risks running to the United 
States)--$2,400.
    (4) Determination of a company's continued qualification for annual 
renewal of its authority as an Admitted Reinsurer--$1,700.
    Questions concerning this notice should be directed to the Surety 
Bond Branch, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Financial 
Management Service, Department of the Treasury, Hyattsville, MD 20782, 
Telephone (202) 874-6850.

    Dated: December 16, 2004.
Wanda J. Rogers,
Assistant Commissioner, Financial Operations, Financial Management 
Service.
[FR Doc. 04-28347 Filed 12-27-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION**




I,
      Steven
      Walin, Chief Executive Officer of GVI Security Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”),
      hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(i)
      The
      Company’s accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended
      September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(ii)
      The
      information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Steven
              WalinSteven
              WalinChief Executive Officer
              Dated:
                November 16, 2006
### §1429. Audit and report

#### (a) Audit

#### (1) In general

The Secretary of Commerce shall enter into a contract with an independent auditor to conduct an audit, on an annual basis, of the First Responder Network Authority in accordance with general accounting principles and procedures applicable to commercial corporate transactions. Each audit conducted under this paragraph shall be made available to the appropriate committees of Congress.

#### (2) Location

Any audit conducted under paragraph (1) shall be conducted at the place or places where accounts of the First Responder Network Authority are normally kept.

#### (3) Access to First Responder Network Authority books and documents

#### (A) In general

For purposes of an audit conducted under paragraph (1), the representatives of the independent auditor shall—

(i) have access to all books, accounts, records, reports, files, and all other papers, things, or property belonging to or in use by the First Responder Network Authority that pertain to the financial transactions of the First Responder Network Authority and are necessary to facilitate the audit; and

(ii) be afforded full facilities for verifying transactions with the balances or securities held by depositories, fiscal agents, and custodians.

#### (B) Requirement

All books, accounts, records, reports, files, papers, and property of the First Responder Network Authority shall remain in the possession and custody of the First Responder Network Authority.

#### (b) Report

#### (1) In general

The independent auditor selected to conduct an audit under this section shall submit a report of each audit conducted under subsection (a) to—

(A) the appropriate committees of Congress;

(B) the President; and

(C) the First Responder Network Authority.

#### (2) Contents

Each report submitted under paragraph (1) shall contain—

(A) such comments and information as the independent auditor determines necessary to inform Congress of the financial operations and condition of the First Responder Network Authority;

(B) any recommendations of the independent auditor relating to the financial operations and condition of the First Responder Network Authority; and

(C) a description of any program, expenditure, or other financial transaction or undertaking of the First Responder Network Authority that was observed during the course of the audit, which, in the opinion of the independent auditor, has been carried on or made without the authority of law.

(Pub. L. 112–96, title VI, §6209, Feb. 22, 2012, 126 Stat. 216.)
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 19, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134481 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

In re: Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

The Honorable Norene S. Redmond 

Judge, 38th District Court 

Eastpointe, Michigan 

 SC: 134481 Justices 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the Judicial Tenure Commission has issued a Decision and 

Recommendation for Discipline, and the Honorable Norene S. Redmond has consented to 

the Commission’s findings of fact. We note that some of the conclusions of the Judicial 

Tenure Commission appear to involve matters reflecting legal error on the part of the 

respondent. We DIRECT the Judicial Tenure Commission to file a written explanation, 

within 28 days after the date of this order, citing any authority it believes it has for 

treating as unethical conduct matters of legal error that could have been subject to 

appellate review. 

We retain jurisdiction. 

t1016 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 19, 2007 

 Clerk
### §4103. Biennial report

Not later than December 31 of each odd-numbered year, the Director of the Government Publishing Office shall submit to the Congress, with respect to the two preceding fiscal years, a report on the directory, the system of access, and the electronic storage facility referred to in section 4101(a). The report shall include a description of the functions involved, including a statement of cost savings in comparison with traditional forms of information distribution.

(Added Pub. L. 103–40, §2(a), June 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 113; amended Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(c)(1), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–235 substituted "Director of the Government Publishing Office" for "Public Printer".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### First Biennial Report

Pub. L. 103–40, §4(b), June 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 114, provided that: "The first report referred to in section 4103 of title 44, United States Code, as added by section 2(a), shall be submitted not later than December 31, 1995."
§ 970.15 Specific criteria for HUD approval of demolition requests. ( a ) In addition to other applicable requirements of this part, HUD will approve an application for demolition upon the PHA's certification that it meets the following statutory criteria, unless the application meets the criteria for disapproval under 24 CFR 970.29. An application for the demolition of all or a portion of a public housing project must certify that the project: ( 1 ) Is obsolete as to physical condition, location, or other factors, making it unsuitable for housing purposes, and no reasonable program of modifications is cost-effective to return the public housing project or portion of the project to useful life; and
( 2 ) In the case of an application for demolition of a portion of a project, the demolition will help to ensure the viability of the remaining portion of the project.
( b ) As to paragraph (a)(1) of this section: ( 1 ) Major problems indicative of obsolescence are: ( i ) As to physical condition: Structural deficiencies that cannot be corrected in a cost-effective manner (settlement of earth below the building caused by inadequate structural fills, faulty structural design, or settlement of floors), or other design or site problems (severe erosion or flooding);
( ii ) As to location: physical deterioration of the neighborhood; change from residential to industrial or commercial development; or environmental conditions as determined by HUD environmental review in accord with 24 CFR part 50, which jeopardize the suitability of the site or a portion of the site and its housing structures for residential use; or
( iii ) There are other factors that have seriously affected the marketability, usefulness, or management of the property.
( 2 ) HUD generally shall not consider a program of modifications to be cost-effective if the costs of such program exceed 62.5 percent of total development cost (TDC) for elevator structures and 57.14 percent of TDC for all other types of structures in effect at the time the application is submitted to HUD.
( c ) As to paragraph (a)(2) of this section, a partial demolition will be considered to ensure the viability of the remaining portion if the application certifies that the demolition will reduce development density to permit better access by emergency, fire, or rescue services, or improve marketability by reducing the density to that of the neighborhood or other developments in the PHA's inventory.
[71 FR 62362, Oct. 24, 2006, as amended at 73 FR 3868, Jan. 23, 2008]
Parent Letter

Dear (Name of Parent/Guardian ): I am writing to ask y ou to complete a survey of parents /guardians who applied for a private school scholarship through the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program (OSP). After you complete the survey , we will mail you a check for $20 in appreciation of your time spent on this effort
. Th e survey

is part of a study

of the OSP that is required by Congress , to help us learn whether the program is effective. T he survey asks questions about what you looked for when choosing a school and your child’s or children’s current school experiences, whether they received an OSP scholarship or not. If yo u applied for more than one child, y ou will need to complete a survey for each chi ld (and will receive $20 for each completed survey).

When y ou applied to the program for a scholarship, y ou agreed that y ou and y our child(ren) would participate in this study over the next few years. T his spring at their schools, each child who applied for an OSP scholarship in 2011 will take a test; those who were in grades 4
- 12 last spring will also complete a brief survey about themselves and their school experiences. All answers by

y ou or yo ur child are completel y confidential . F indings from the survey s and tests will only

be reported i n summary and will not identify you or your child
. Westat and its partners, as the U.S. Department’s OSP evaluation contractors, are required by law to uphold all federal laws regarding privacy and confidentiality
. If you have an y questions or need help completing th is survey , please contact Laura Prinslow, Research Associate at Westat (phone: 1 - 888 - xxx - xxxx ; email : <email address> )
. Thank y ou for participating in this important evaluation
. Sincerel y, The survey

should take approximately **X** minutes. We ask that y ou complete it by **Y** date. The easiest way

to fill out the survey

is on the web:

 Go to www.(name of webs ite).com.  E nter the unique username and password we have assigned to, listed below:

Username: Password: If you would prefer a paper version of the survey, please email, (insert email address), or call 888
- xxx - xxxx .Juanita Lucas - McLean

Project Director
### §14521. Application

This subchapter applies to a vessel described in section 14501 of this title that is not measured under subchapter II of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 99–509, title V, §5101(3), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1925.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### Revised section 14521

Source: Section (U.S. Code) 46 App. U.S.C. 71.

Section 14521 provides that vessels that are to be measured under the regulatory measurement system in this chapter, but are not measured under the standard regulatory measurement system in subchapter II, shall be measured under the simplified measurement system.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Navistar International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Troy A. Clarke, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date: March 8, 2016





/s/     TROYA. CLARKETroy A. ClarkePresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)








This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification shall also not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.











E-4
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3295 

To suspend temporarily the duty on pro-jet cyan 854 liquid feed. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2005 

Mr. CASTLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on pro-jet cyan 854 liquid 

feed. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PRO-JET BLACK CYAN 854 LIQUID FEED. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.13.03 Copper phthalocyanine substituted with sulphonic acids 

and alkyl sulphonoamides, 

sodium/ammonium salts 

(PMN No. P02–893) (provided for in subheading 

3204.14.30) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 3295 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ