alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-1630

___________________________

United States of America

llllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Eddie David Cox

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

Submitted: February 26, 2020

Filed: March 6, 2020 

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, KELLY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States. 

See Cox v. United States, 589 U.S. ---,140 S. Ct. 396 (2019) (mem.), vacating 766 F.

App’x 423 (8th Cir. 2019) (per curiam). The Supreme Court granted certiorari,

vacated our judgment, and remanded the matter for reconsideration in light of Rehaif

v. United States, 588 U.S. ---, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019). 
“In Rehaif, the Supreme Court concluded that in a prosecution under 18 U.S.C.

§ 922(g) and § 924(a)(2), the Government must prove both that the defendant knew

he possessed a firearm and that he knew he belonged to the relevant category of

persons barred from possessing a firearm.” United States v. Davies, 942 F.3d 871,

873 (8th Cir. 2019) (internal quotation marks omitted and emphasis in original). 

Because this issue is raised for the first time on appeal, we review for plain error. See

id.; see also United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 732 (1993) (explaining that plain

error requires (1) an error (2) that is plain and (3) that affects substantial rights).

The Government concedes that the first two prongs of the plain error standard

are satisfied. But we conclude that Cox cannot show the error affected his substantial

rights. Davies, 942 F.3d at 873 (“The Supreme Court has explained that, in the

ordinary case, an error affects the defendant’s substantial rights if the defendant

shows a reasonable probability that, but for the error, the outcome of the proceeding

would have been different.” (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted)). In

addition to a number of other convictions resulting in years of imprisonment, Cox

was previously convicted as a felon in possession of a firearm and served

approximately six years’ imprisonment for the conviction. See United States v.

Hollingshed, 940 F.3d 410, 415-16 (8th Cir. 2019) (finding that a defendant who had

served over four years’ imprisonment could not show that any error affected his

substantial rights); United States v. Benamor, 937 F.3d 1182, 1189 (9th Cir. 2019)

(finding that, following Rehaif, the defendant could not show that his substantial

rights were affected in part because the defendant had a prior felon-in-possession

conviction).

-2-
For the foregoing reasons, we thus reinstate our vacated opinion (as well as

Judge Kelly’s dissent) and again affirm the district court.1

______________________________

1The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report of Tengion, Inc.; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: April 24, 2012 |                                  |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                 | /s / John L. Miclot                   |
|                 | John L. Miclot                        |
|                 | President and Chief Executive Officer |

----
EXHIBIT
31.1








CERTIFICATIONS
UNDER SECTION 302








I, David
Lichtenstein, certify that:




1.  I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lightstone Value Plus Real
Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (the “Company”);






2.  Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;






3.  Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;






4.  The
Company’s other certifying officer and I have:






a)  designed
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)), or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;






b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and






c)
disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal
quarter (the Company's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company's internal control over financial reporting; and






5.  The
Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s
auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):






a)  all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and






b)  any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.







March
      31, 2009





/s/ David
      Lichtenstein


David
      Lichtenstein


Chairman,
      President, and Chief Executive
Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)
CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Douglas Lake Minerals Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Laurence Stephenson, President (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, and Gurpreet Singh Sangha, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Date:  September 12, 2005 | /s/ Laurence StephensonLaurence Stephenson
President (Principal Executive Officer)
|------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:  September 12, 2005 | /s/ Gurpreet Singh SanghaGurpreet Singh Sangha
Chief Financial Officer            

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Douglas Lake Minerals Inc. and will be retained by Douglas Lake Minerals Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KENNETH M. PARROTTE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 437 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of March, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
§ 886.101 Applicability. ( a ) The policies and procedures of this subpart apply to Housing Assistance Payments under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 on behalf of Eligible Families in Eligible Projects (see definitions in § 886.102).
( b ) The primary goal of the Section 8 Loan Management Set-Aside Program is to reduce claims on the Department's insurance fund by aiding those FHA-insured or Secretary-Held projects with immediately or potentially serious financial difficulties. A first priority should be given to projects with presently serious financial problems, which are likely to result in a claim on the insurance fund in the near future. To the extent resources remain available, assistance also may be provided to projects with potentially serious financial problems which, on the basis of financial and/or management analysis, appear to have a high probability of producing a claim on the insurance fund within approximately the next five years.
[42 FR 5603, Jan. 28, 1977, as amended at 53 FR 3368, Feb. 5, 1988]
---

---

Exhibit 13.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
of Saifun Semiconductors Ltd. (the Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Commission) on the date hereof (the
Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Igal Shany, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, that:

(1)        the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)        the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  | By: /s/ Igal Shany
Igal ShanyChief Financial Officer
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 2, 2007

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Saifun Semiconductors Ltd. and will
be retained by Saifun Semiconductors Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



---

---
### §1512. Relationship to Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to limit, restrict, or circumvent in any way the implementation of the nationwide public safety broadband network defined in section 6001 of title VI of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (47 U.S.C. 1401) or any rules implementing that network under title VI of that Act (47 U.S.C. 1401 et seq.).

(Pub. L. 115–141, div. P, title VI, §622, Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1115.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title VI of div. P of Pub. L. 115–141, Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1097, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title VI to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1501 of this title and Tables.

The Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 112–96, Feb. 22, 2012, 126 Stat. 156. Title VI of the Act is classified principally to chapter 13 (§1401 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1(a) of Pub. L. 112–96, set out as a Short Title of 2012 Amendment note under section 1 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code, and Tables.
**Exhibit 21.1****List of Significant Subsidiaries of Copano Energy, L.L.C. (as of December 31, 2007)**   **Name** **Jurisdiction of Formation**Copano Energy Finance Corporation Delaware   ScissorTail Energy, LLC Delaware   Cimmarron Gathering, LP Texas   Copano Field Services/Copano Bay, L.P. Texas   Copano Field Services/South Texas, L.P. Texas   Copano Field Services/Agua Dulce, L.P. Texas   Copano Field Services/Central Gulf Coast, L.P. Texas   Copano Field Services/Karnes, L.P. Texas   Copano Field Services/Upper Gulf Coast, L.P. Texas   Copano Field Services/Live Oak, L.P. Texas   Copano Pipelines/South Texas, L.P. Texas   Copano Pipelines/Upper Gulf Coast, L.P. Texas   Copano Pipelines/Hebbronville, L.P. Texas   Copano Pipelines/Texas Gulf Coast, L.P. Texas   Copano Energy Services/Upper Gulf Coast, L.P. Texas   Copano Energy Services/Texas Gulf Coast, L.P. Texas   Copano NGL Services, L.P. Texas   Copano Processing, L.P. Texas   Copano/Webb-Duval Pipeline, L.P. Delaware   CPNO Services, L.P. Texas   Copano Risk Management, L.P. Texas
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION 

FOR REINSTATEMENT OF KAMAH 

MENSELEH GUEH-THORONKA TO 

THE BAR OF MARYLAND

*

*

*

*

*

*

 IN THE

 COURT OF APPEALS

 OF MARYLAND

 Misc. Docket AG No. 95

 September Term, 2021 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Kamah Menseleh Gueh-Thoronka’s Verified Petition for 

Reinstatement, Bar Counsel’s response to the petition, and Petitioner’s “Motion for 

Petition for Reinstatement to be Granted Without a Hearing,” it is this 18th day of 

November 2022, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring,

ORDERED by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the court 

concurring, that the Petition is, GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that Kamah Menseleh Gueh-Thoronka is reinstated as a member of the 

Bar of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that, the Clerk of the Court shall replace the name Kamah Menseleh 

Gueh-Thoronka upon the register of attorneys entitled to practice law in this State and 

certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial 

tribunals in this State. 

 

/s/ Matthew J. Fader

 Chief Judge
### §1009. Expedited proceedings

(a) The Commission shall give all proceedings involving the Rock Island Railroad preference over all other pending proceedings related to rail carriers and make all of its decisions at the earliest practicable time.

(b) The Commission shall, within 100 days of the filing of an application (or such shorter period as the court may set) pursuant to section 915 of this title, reach a decision on all proceedings filed after January 1, 1980, which involve a sale, transfer or lease of any line of the Rock Island Railroad to a solvent carrier.

(Pub. L. 96–254, title I, §111, May 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 404.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Abolition of Interstate Commerce Commission and Transfer of Functions

Interstate Commerce Commission abolished and functions of Commission transferred, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, to Surface Transportation Board effective Jan. 1, 1996, by section 1302 of Title 49, Transportation, and section 101 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of Title 49. References to Interstate Commerce Commission deemed to refer to Surface Transportation Board, a member or employee of the Board, or Secretary of Transportation, as appropriate, see section 205 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of Title 49.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 92 (Thursday, May 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 26942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11441]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

    The National Civilian Community Corps Advisory Board gives notice 
of the following meeting:

Date and Time:  Friday, June 11, 2010, 2 p.m.-3:30 p.m.

Place: Conference room 8312, 8th floor, Corporation for 
National and Community Service Headquarters, 1201 New York Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20525.

Status: Open.

Matters To Be Considered

I. Meeting Convenes
II. Committee Reports
     Projects and Partnership Committee
     Member Services Committee
     Policy and Operations Committee
III. Public Comment

    Accommodations: Anyone who needs an interpreter or other 
accommodation should notify the Corporation's contact person by 5 p.m. 
Friday, June 4, 2010.
    Contact Person for More Information: Erma Hodge, NCCC, Corporation 
for National and Community Service, 9th Floor, Room 9802B, 1201 New 
York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20525. Phone (202) 606-6696. Fax (202) 
606-3462. TDD: (202) 606-3472. E-mail: ehodge@cns.gov.

    Dated: May 10, 2010.
Frank R. Trinity,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-11441 Filed 5-11-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6050-$$-P
```
#### Fred A. Lohn, appellee, v. J. A. Foberg, appellant.

Gen. No. 27,690.

Action for personal injuries through being struck by automobile. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Francis S. Wilson, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1922.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed May 9, 1923.

William J. Dillon, for appellant. Short, Davies & Rust, for appellee; E. O. Reniff, of counsel.

Mr. Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board

# AGENCY:

Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board.

# ACTION:

Notice.

                    Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3511(d), the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), and the FASAB Rules Of Procedure, as amended in October 2010, notice is hereby given that the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) has issued a joint exposure draft of a proposed Federal Financial Accounting Technical Release (TR) titled                     *Implementation Guidance for Leases*                     and a proposed Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standards (SFFAS) titled                     *Omnibus Amendments to Leases-Related Topics.*

                    The exposure draft is available on the FASAB website at                     *https://www.fasab.gov/​documents-for-comment/​.*                     Copies can be obtained by contacting FASAB at (202) 512-7350.                

                    Respondents are encouraged to comment on any part of the joint exposure draft. Written comments are requested by February 5, 2021, and should be sent to                     *fasab@fasab.gov*                     or Monica R. Valentine, Executive Director, Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board, 441 G Street NW, Suite 1155, Washington, DC 20548.                

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Monica R. Valentine, Executive Director, 441 G Street NW, Suite 1155, Washington, DC 20548, or call (202) 512-7350.

Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.), 31 U.S.C. 3511(d).

Dated: November 10, 2020.

Monica R. Valentine,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 2020-26724 Filed 12-3-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1610-02-P
Editorial Note on Part 1206
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1206 (formerly part 206) appear at 67 FR 19111, Apr. 18, 2002.

§ 1206.60 What reporting adjustments must I make for transportation allowances? ( a ) If your actual transportation allowance is less than the amount that you claimed on Form ONRR-2014 for each month during the allowance reporting period, you must pay additional royalties due, plus late payment interest calculated under § 1218.54 of this chapter from the first day of the first month that you were authorized to deduct a transportation allowance to the date that you repay the difference.
( b ) If the actual transportation allowance is greater than the amount that you claimed on Form ONRR-2014 for any month during the period reported on the allowance form, you may report a credit for, or request a refund of, any overpaid royalties without interest under § 1218.53 of this chapter.
( c ) If you make an adjustment under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section, then you must submit a corrected Form ONRR-2014 to reflect actual costs, together with any payment, using instructions that ONRR provides.
#### § 891.160 Audit requirements.

Nonprofit organizations receiving assistance under this part are subject to the audit requirements of 2 CFR part 200, subpart F.

[78 FR 37112, June 20, 2013, as amended at 80 FR 75941, Dec. 7, 2015]