alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3112

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain decorative plates, decorative 

sculptures, decorative plaques, and architectural miniatures. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 29, 2005

Mr. KIRK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain decorative plates, 

decorative sculptures, decorative plaques, and architectural miniatures.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN DECORATIVE PLATES, DECORATIVE 

4 SCULPTURES, DECORATIVE PLAQUES, AND 

5 ARCHITECTURAL MINIATURES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading:
2

•HR 3112 IH 

‘‘ 9902.09.51 Decorative plates, whether 

or not with decorative rim or 

attached sculpture; decorative sculptures, each with 

plate or plaque attached, 

and decorative plaques each 

not over 7.65 cm in thickness; architectural miniatures, whether or not put up 

in sets; all the foregoing of 

resin materials and containing agglomerated stone, 

put up for mail order retail 

sale, whether for wall or tabletop display and each 

weighing not over 1.36 kg 

together with their retail 

packaging (provided for in 

subheading 3926.40.00). ..... Free No change No change 12/31/2008 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
### Part K—National Maritime Transportation Advisory Committees
### §1110. Repealed. Pub. L. 99–509, title IV, §4033(c)(1)(C)(i)(II), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1908

Section, Pub. L. 97–35, title XI, §1161, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 682, related to transfer of Conrail light density rail service lines.
#### § 904.205 Training methodology.

Equal in importance to the content of the pre- and post-occupancy training is the training methodology. Because groups vary, there should be adaptability in the communication and learning experience. Methods to be utilized may include group presentations, small discussion groups, special classes, and workshops. Especially important to a successful program are individual family home visits for discussion and instruction on unique problems and operation of equipment.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. ("Company")") Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 ("Report"), the
undersigned certifies that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 17, 2010

By: /s/ JASON MEYERS
--------------------
Co-Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BOARD OF TRUSTEEES OF THESHEET ETAL WORKERS’ PENSIONTRUST OF NORTHERNCALIFORNIA, BRUCE WORD,TRUSTEE,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

WES-CO INDUSTRIES, aCalifornia Corp., et al.,

Defendant(s).

)))))))))))))))

No. C09-0847 BZ

CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The parties to this matter having advised the Court that

they have agreed to a settlement, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that

this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and all scheduled

matters are VACATED; provided, however, that any party may,

within 60 days of the date of this Order, move the Court to

restore this matter to the calendar on the grounds that the

settlement has not been consummated.

Dated: March 17, 2010

   Bernard Zimmerman

                        United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-00847-BZ   Document 23   Filed 03/17/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-09T20:21:56-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
****

**Grand-Challenge-Scale Applications**
The HPCC Program funds the development of applications other than  the Grand Challenges. This workgoes on in particular at NSF and DOE  facilities and at NASA.  Examples of these activities aredescribed  below.  Additional NSF highlights are described at: 
http://pscinfo.psc.edu/MetaCenter/MetaScience/welcome.html
***Simulation of Chorismate mutase*
Chorismate mutase is an enzyme involved in the synthesis of amino  acids.  Bacteria use it to speed upchemical reactions by a factor of  more than a million.  Because it does not occur in the human body, inhibitors of this enzyme may be safe antibacterial agents.  Using  high performance computing at theCornell Theory Center,  researchers have discovered strong concentrated lines of  electrostatic forceleading to the "active site," that is, the spot  where molecules are processed.  This may provide thesecret to the  enzyme's potency and lead to improved drug design. 
A five-minute high-resolution animation containing images of the  complexity shown in the accompanyingfigure required 40 hours of  computing on each of 10 processors of an IBM SP-2 and produced approximately 16 GB of data.**
#### § 583.200 Application and grant award.

When funds are made available for assistance, HUD will publish a notice of funding availability (NOFA) in the Federal Register, in accordance with the requirements of 24 CFR part 4. HUD will review and screen applications in accordance with the requirements in section 426 of the McKinney Act (42 U.S.C. 11386) and the guidelines, rating criteria, and procedures published in the NOFA.

[61 FR 51176, Sept. 30, 1996]
§ 905.610 Technical processing. ( a ) *Review.* HUD shall review all development proposals and site acquisition proposals for compliance with the statutory, Executive order, and regulatory requirements applicable to the development of public housing and the project. HUD's review will evaluate whether the proposed sources and uses of funds are eligible and reasonable, and whether the financing and other documentation establish to HUD's satisfaction that the development is financially viable and structured so as to adequately protect the federal investment of funds in the development. For this purpose, HUD will consider the PHA's proposed methodology for allocating operating subsidies on behalf of the public housing units, the projected revenue to be generated by any nonpublic housing units in a mixed-finance development, and the 10-year operating pro forma and other information contained in the development proposal.
( b ) *Subsidy layering analysis.* After the PHA submits the documentation required under paragraph (a) of this section, HUD or its designee (e.g., the State Housing Finance Agency) shall carry out a subsidy layering analysis, pursuant to section 102(d) of the Department of Housing and Urban Development Reform Act of 1989 (42 U.S.C. 3545) (see 24 CFR part 4), to determine that the amount of assistance being provided for the development is not more than necessary to make the assisted activity feasible after taking into account the other governmental assistance.
( c ) *Safe harbor standards.* For mixed-finance projects, in order to expedite the mixed-finance review process and control costs, HUD may make available safe harbor and maximum fee ranges for a number of costs. If a project is at or below a safe harbor standard, no further review will be required by HUD. If a project is above a safe harbor standard, additional review by HUD will be necessary. In order to approve terms above the safe harbor, the PHA must demonstrate to HUD in writing that the negotiated terms are appropriate for the level of risk involved in the project, the scope of work, any specific circumstances of the development, and the local or national market for the services provided.
( d ) *Approval.* If HUD determines that a site acquisition proposal or a development proposal is approvable, HUD shall notify the PHA in writing of its approval. The HUD approval of a development proposal will include the appropriate form of ACC for signature. The PHA must execute the ACC and return it to HUD for execution. Until HUD approves a development proposal, a PHA may only expend public housing funds for predevelopment costs, as provided in § 905.612 of this part.
( e ) *Amendments to approved development proposals.* HUD must approve any material change to an approved development proposal. HUD defines material change as: ( 1 ) A change in the number of public housing units;
( 2 ) A change in the number of bedrooms by an increase/decrease of more than 10 percent;
( 3 ) A change in cost or financing by an increase/decrease of more than 10 percent; or
( 4 ) A change in the site.
### §356. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §703(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2789

Section, act Sept. 22, 1922, ch. 400, 42 Stat. 1012, extended time for development of underground water supplies with reclamation grants.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §703(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2789, provided that the repeal made by section 703(a) is effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976.

#### Savings Provision

Repeal by Pub. L. 94–579 not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
### §40705. Presidential review of Commission orders

(a) Transmission to President.—The Federal Maritime Commission shall transmit to the President, concurrently with publication thereof, each order of suspension or final order of prohibition issued under section 40704 of this title.

(b) Presidential Request and Commission Action.—Within 10 days after receipt or the effective date of a Commission order referred to in subsection (a), the President, in writing, may request the Commission to stay the effect of the order if the President finds that the stay is required for reasons of national defense or foreign policy. The reasons shall be specified in the request. The Commission shall immediately grant the request by issuing an order in which the President's request shall be described. During a stay, the President shall, whenever practicable, attempt to resolve the matter by negotiating with representatives of the applicable foreign governments.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §7, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1537.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 40705 | 46 App.:1708(e). | Pub. L. 98–237, §9(e), Mar. 20, 1984, 98 Stat. 77; Pub. L. 105–258, title I, §108(16), Oct. 14, 1998, 112 Stat. 1909. |

Section

In subsection (b), the words "Notwithstanding any other law" are omitted as unnecessary.
§ 3280.307 Resistance to elements and use. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 75749 , Sept. 16, 2024.
( a ) Exterior coverings shall be of moisture and weather resistive materials attached with corrosion resistant fasteners to resist wind, snow and rain. Metal coverings and exposed metal structural members shall be of corrosion resistant materials or shall be protected to resist corrosion. All joints between portions of the exterior covering shall be designed, and assembled to protect against the infiltration of air and water, except for any designed ventilation of wall or roof cavity.
( b ) Joints between dissimilar materials and joints between exterior coverings and frames of openings shall be protected with a compatible sealant suitable to resist infiltration of air or water.
( c ) Where adjoining materials or assemblies of materials are of such nature that separation can occur due to expansion, contraction, wind loads or other loads induced by erection or transportation, sealants shall be of a type that maintains protection against infiltration or penetration by air, moisture or vermin.
( d ) Exterior surfaces shall be sealed to resist the entrance of rodents.
( e ) Multi-section and attached manufactured homes (see subpart K of this part) are not required to comply with the factory installation of weather-resistant exterior finishes for those areas left open for field connection of the sections provided the following conditions are satisfied: ( 1 ) Temporary weather protection for exposed, unprotected construction is provided in accordance with methods to be included in the approved design.
( 2 ) Methods for on-site completion and finishing of these elements are included in the approved design.
( 3 ) Complete installation instructions and the required materials for finishing these elements are provided.
[40 FR 58752, Dec. 18, 1975, as amended at 86 FR 2520, Jan. 12, 2021]
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3285 

To suspend temporarily the duty on charge control agent 7. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2005 

Mr. CASTLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on charge control agent 

7. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CHARGE CONTROL AGENT 7. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.13.12 Charge control agent 7 

Chromate(1-),bis{1-{(5- 

chloro-2-hydroxyphenyl)azo}- 

2-napthalenolato(2-)}-hydrogen (provided for in subheading 2942.00.10) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 3285 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### In the Matter of Keith Williams, Petitioner, v Warren Barkley, as Superintendent of Cape Vincent Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[832 NYS2d 855]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Jefferson County [Hugh A. Gilbert, J.], entered November 22, 2006) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a tier III hearing that petitioner had violated various inmate rules.

It is hereby ordered that the determination be and the same hereby is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed. Present—Scudder, EJ., Smith, Fahey, Peradotto and Pine, JJ.
EXHIBIT 31.2
GLOBAL CASH ACCESS, INC.
CERTIFICATION
     I, Harry C. Hagerty, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Global Cash Access, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Dated:March 10, 2005 By: /s/ Harry C. Hagerty       Harry C. Hagerty   Chief Financial Officer
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALLISON C. PIERCE,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Defendant. /

No. C 09-02713 JSW

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE

This matter is set for a hearing on June 4, 2010 on Defendant Commissioner of Social

Security Administration’s motion to dismiss. The Court HEREBY ORDERS that an opposition

to the motion shall be filed by no later than April 27, 2010 and a reply brief shall be filed by no

later than May 4, 2010.

If the Court determines that the matter is suitable for resolution without oral argument, it

will so advise the parties in advance of the hearing date. If the parties wish to modify this

schedule, they may submit for the Court’s consideration a stipulation and proposed order

demonstrating good cause for any modification requested.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 13, 2010 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-02713-JSW Document 26 Filed 04/13/10 Page 1 of 1
### §4303. Inspection and testing

(a) Subject to regulations, supervision, and reviews that the Secretary may prescribe, the Secretary may delegate to a person, private or public agency, or organization, or to an officer or employee under the supervision of that person or agency, any work, business, or function related to the testing, inspection, and examination necessary for compliance enforcement and for the development of data to enable the Secretary to prescribe regulations under section 4302 of this title.

(b) The Secretary may—

(1) conduct research, testing, and development necessary to carry out this chapter, including the procurement by negotiation or otherwise of experimental and other recreational vessels or associated equipment for research and testing purposes; and

(2) subsequently sell those vessels.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 531.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 4303 | 46:1457 |

Section 4303 authorizes the Secretary to delegate to certain persons or agencies or organizations any work, business, or function related to the testing, inspection, and examination necessary for compliance enforcement. The Secretary may also conduct research, testing, and development necessary to carry out this chapter, including procurement of vessels and equipment and their subsequent sale. The Committee wishes to make clear that the Secretary may sell anything that was purchased to test.
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 Certification
I, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered bythis annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2004-19;
1.  Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; 2.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports; 3.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and 4.  The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.
In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.
Date: March 29, 2005     By: /s/ Ellen Z. Lamale   Name: Ellen Z. Lamale  Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary