alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 256 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 256

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an alternate release 
     date for certain nonviolent offenders, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2005

   Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an alternate release 
     date for certain nonviolent offenders, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Prison Bureau Nonviolent 
Offender Relief Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. EARLY RELEASE FOR CERTAIN NONVIOLENT OFFENDERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 3624 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ``at the early release 
        date provided in subsection (g), if applicable, or otherwise'' 
        after ``A prisoner shall be released by the Bureau of 
        Prisons''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) Early Release for Certain Nonviolent Offenders.--
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Bureau of Prisons, 
pursuant to a good time policy, shall release from confinement a 
prisoner who has served one half or more of his term of imprisonment 
(including any consecutive term or terms of imprisonment) if that 
prisoner--
            ``(1) has attained the age of 45 years;
            ``(2) has never been convicted of a crime of violence; and
            ``(3) has not engaged in any violation, involving violent 
        conduct, of institutional disciplinary regulations.''.
                                 <all>
```
### §831. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 94–210, title V, §511, Feb. 5, 1976, 90 Stat. 76; Pub. L. 94–555, title II, §§215, 220(e), (f), Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2625, 2629, 2630; Pub. L. 96–448, title IV, §405(e), Oct. 14, 1980, 94 Stat. 1947; Pub. L. 99–509, title IV, §4033(c)(5), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1909; Pub. L. 102–240, title I, §1036(e), Dec. 18, 1991, 105 Stat. 1986, which related to guarantee of obligations, was repealed, except for subsec. (c), by Pub. L. 105–178, title VII, §7203(a)(2), June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 477. Subsec. (c) of section 831 was amended, redesignated, and transferred to section 823(b) of this title by Pub. L. 105–178, title VII, §7203(a)(3), (4), June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 477. Section 823(b) of this title was subsequently repealed by Pub. L. 117–58, div. B, title I, §21301(b)(1)(A), Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 683.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Copano Energy, L.L.C. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Report”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 27, 2013, I, Carl A. Luna, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

(1)                     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

 

(2)                     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:   March 27, 2013 | /S/   CARL A. LUNA                                  |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                        | Carl   A. Luna                                      |
|                        | Senior   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### § 93.354 Funding Accountability and Transparency Act.

The HTF grant to the grantee and all assistance provided to subgrantees and recipients shall be considered a Federal award for purposes of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (31 U.S.C. 6101 note).
###### Editorial Note on Part 888

#### Editorial Note:

For revisions and amendments affecting Schedules A, B, C, and D, issued under part 888, but not carried in the Code of Federal Regulations, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*

#### § 888.201 Purpose.

Automatic Annual Adjustment Factors are used to adjust rents under the Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments Program.

[44 FR 75383, Dec. 20, 1979]
### §767. Repealed. Dec. 16, 1930, ch. 14, §1, 46 Stat. 1029

Section, R.S. §2407, authorized a departure from ordinary method in surveying land on a watercourse.
### §2912. Preservation of electronic messages and other records

(a) Regulations Required.—The Archivist shall promulgate regulations governing Federal agency preservation of electronic messages that are determined to be records. Such regulations shall, at a minimum—

(1) require the electronic capture, management, and preservation of such electronic records in accordance with the records disposition requirements of chapter 33;

(2) require that such electronic records are readily accessible for retrieval through electronic searches; and

(3) include timelines for Federal agency implementation of the regulations that ensure compliance as expeditiously as practicable.

(b) Coverage of Other Electronic Records.—To the extent practicable, the regulations promulgated under subsection (a) shall also include requirements for the capture, management, and preservation of other electronic records.

(c) Review of Regulations Required.—The Archivist shall periodically review and, as necessary, amend the regulations promulgated under subsection (a).

(Added Pub. L. 116–283, div. H, title XCVI, §9602(b)(1), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4828.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Deadline for Regulations

Pub. L. 116–283, div. H, title XCVI, §9602(b)(2), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4828, provided that: "Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act [Jan. 1, 2021], the Archivist shall propose the regulations required under section 2912(a) of title 44, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1)."
#### § 75.1 Purpose.

This part establishes the requirements to be followed to ensure the objectives of Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 (12 U.S.C. 1701u) (Section 3) are met. The purpose of Section 3 is to ensure that economic opportunities, most importantly employment, generated by certain HUD financial assistance shall be directed to low- and very low-income persons, particularly those who are recipients of government assistance for housing or residents of the community in which the Federal assistance is spent.
#### § 990.325 Record retention requirements.

The PHA shall retain all documents related to all financial management and activities funded under the Operating Fund for a period of five fiscal years after the fiscal year in which the funds were received.
§ 576.302 States. Grant funds returned by a State will be reallocated as follows: ( a ) *Eligible recipients.* HUD will make the funds available: ( 1 ) To metropolitan cities and urban counties in the State that were not allocated funds under § 576.3 because the amount they would have been allocated did not meet the minimum requirement under § 576.3(b)(2);
( 2 ) If funds remain, to county governments in the State other than urban counties;
( 3 ) Then, if funds remain, to metropolitan cities and urban counties in the State that were allocated funds under § 576.3.
( b ) *Notification of availability.* HUD will notify eligible recipients of the availability of the funds by a notification letter or Federal Register notice, which will specify how the awards of funds will be made.
( c ) *Application requirements.* Within 45 days after the date of notification, the eligible recipient must submit to HUD: ( 1 ) A substantial amendment to its approved consolidated plan in accordance with 24 CFR part 91; or
( 2 ) If the eligible recipient does not have an approved consolidated plan, an abbreviated consolidated plan that meets the requirements in the Federal Register notice or notification letter from HUD.
( d ) *Restrictions that apply to reallocated amounts.* The same requirements that apply to grant funds allocated under § 576.3 apply to grant funds reallocated under this section.
Case 3:09-cv-02591-MEJ Document 32 Filed 01/19/10 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

GRANTED

Judge Bernard Zimmerman

GRANTED. No further 

continuances. 

Dated: January 19, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-02591-MEJ Document 32 Filed 01/19/10 Page 2 of 2
### §102. Barge

In this title, the term "barge" means a non-self-propelled vessel.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §4, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1486.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 102 | 46:2101(2). | |

Section
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Norman Church, Appellant, v. Walter H. Wilkins, as Warden of Attica Prison, Respondent.

Motion to prosecute appeal on original papers, and for other relief denied. (See *People ex rel. Maconi*v. *Murphy,*11 A D 2d 1096.)
### FOR PUBLICATION



### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT



#  M ICHAEL J AMES B ERGER , a single man also known as Magic Mike,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 05-35752
C ITY OF S EATTLE ; V IRGINIA D.C. No. A NDERSON , Director of Seattle CV-03-03238-JLR Center; M ICHAEL B. A NDERSON , Western District of



# 
Emergency Service Manager for Washington, Seattle Center; T EN U NKNOWN Seattle E MPLOYEES /O FFICERS , of the Seattle ORDER Center and the City of Seattle, all in both their individual and official capacities,

Defendants-Appellants. 

# 

Filed September 2, 2009

Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Harry Pregerson, Stephen Reinhardt, Michael Daly Hawkins, Kim McLane Wardlaw, Ronald M. Gould, Richard A. Paez, Marsha S. Berzon, Richard C. Tallman, Milan D. Smith, Jr.

and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Appellee Michael Berger is awarded attorneys’ fees on appeal.

Contrary to the respondents’ suggestion, the fee request was timely. A request for attorneys’ fees must be filed no later than fourteen days after the expiration of the period within

12201which a petition for rehearing might have been filed. See 9th Cir. R. 39-1.6. Although the applicable procedural rules, national and local, do not expressly provide for the filing ofa petition for full court rehearing en banc, they apply generally to the procedures governing rehearing en banc, with no exception for full court en banc. See 9th Cir. R. 35-3; Fed. R.App. P. 35, 40. Indeed, in every circuit but ours, every petition for rehearing en banc is a petition for full court en banc, so the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure necessarily apply to such petitions. Our General Orders so recognize, as they expressly contemplate the filing of a petition for rehearing en banc before the full court within fourteen days after the filing of an en banc disposition. See 9th Cir. Gen. Order 5.8.

The court received Appellee’s petition within fourteen days after the expiration of the period within which a petition fora full court rehearing might have been filed. Appellee’s petition is therefore timely.

The determination of an appropriate amount of fees on appeal is referred to the Appellate Commissioner, who shall conduct whatever proceedings he deems appropriate. The Appellate Commissioner’s order is subject to reconsideration by the panel. See 9th Cir. R. 39-1.9. 12202 B ERGER v. C ITY OF S EATTLEPRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Harpreet S. Sangha, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Douglas Lake Minerals Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|Date:  September 5, 2006 | /s/ Harpreet S. Sangha
Harpreet S. Sangha 
President and Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### § 891.185 Preemption of rent control laws.

The Department finds that it is necessary and desirable to assist project owners to preserve the continued viability of each project assisted under this part (except subpart E) as a housing resource for very low-income elderly persons or persons with disabilities. The Department also finds that it is necessary to protect the substantial economic interest of the Federal Government in those projects. Therefore, the Department concludes that it is in the national interest to preempt, and it does hereby preempt, the entire field of rent regulation by local rent control boards or other authority acting pursuant to state or local law as it affects those projects. Part 246 of this title applies to projects covered by subpart E of this part.

[63 FR 64803, Nov. 23, 1998]
```

[114th Congress Public Law 247]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 130 STAT. 996]]

Public Law 114-247
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to improve the Veterans 
          Crisis Line. <<NOTE: Nov. 28, 2016 -  [H.R. 5392]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: No Veterans 
Crisis Line Call Should Go Unanswered Act.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Veterans Crisis Line Call Should 
Go Unanswered Act''.
SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENTS TO VETERANS CRISIS LINE.

    (a) Quality Assurance Document.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs 
shall develop a quality assurance document to use in carrying out the 
Veterans Crisis Line. Such document shall--
            (1) outline clearly defined and measurable performance 
        indicators and objectives to improve the responsiveness and 
        performance of the Veterans Crisis Line, including at backup 
        call centers;
            (2) include quantifiable timeframes to meet designated 
        objectives to assist the Secretary in tracking the progress of 
        the Veterans Crisis Line and such backup call centers in meeting 
        the performance indicators and objectives specified in paragraph 
        (1); and
            (3) with respect to such timeframes and objectives, be 
        consistent with guidance issued by the Office of Management and 
        Budget.

    (b) Plan.--The Secretary shall develop a plan to ensure that each 
telephone call, text message, and other communications received by the 
Veterans Crisis Line, including at backup call centers, is answered in a 
timely manner by a person, consistent with the guidance established by 
the American Association of Suicidology. <<NOTE: Guidelines.>> Such plan 
shall include guidelines to carry out periodic testing of the Veterans 
Crisis Line, including such backup centers, during each fiscal year to 
identify and correct any problems in a timely manner.

    (c) Submission.-- <<NOTE: Deadline. Reports.>> Not later than 180 
days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
submit to the Committees on Veterans' Affairs of the House of 
Representatives and the Senate a report containing the document 
developed under subsection (a) and the plan developed under subsection 
(b).

[[Page 130 STAT. 997]]

    (d) Veterans Crisis Line Defined.--In this section, the term 
``Veterans Crisis Line'' means the toll-free hotline for veterans 
established under section 1720F(h) of title 38, United States Code.

    Approved November 28, 2016.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5392:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016):
            Sept. 26, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 16, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
August 20, 2014 

Kevln Schlemmer 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE 

Washington, D.C.. 20590 

Dear Mr. Schlemmer: 

The City of Gladstone joins the Delta County Airport Board and the Delta County Board of 

Commissioners in their support of the bid from Skywest Airlines. 

Skywest Airlines proposal offers the same service our regional airport is currently receiving, and their 

code share package with Delta Airlines will maintain the consistency and continuity needed to increase 

the already established frequent flyer loyalty in our community. The airport's current bank of time 

schedules is a key part to the increase of enplanement numbers, and maintaining a familiar service will 

allow for these numbers to continue growing. 

Furthermore, Delta Airlines partners have shown a consistent high degree of customer service for our 

community and visitors. Their reliable schedule provides quick access to Detroit's Network of world 

connections necessary to assist our community in creating global economic opportunities. 

Thank you for your consideration in this matter, 

Sincerely, 

Darla Falcon, City Manager
### [§10507. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–206, title IV, §415(a), Dec. 20, 1993, 107 Stat. 2438]

Section, Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 571, related to duties of shipping commissioners.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3305 

To amend the National Security Act of 1947 to prohibit persons who disclose 

classified information from holding a security clearance for access to 

such information. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2005 

Mr. MEEHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend the National Security Act of 1947 to prohibit 

persons who disclose classified information from holding 

a security clearance for access to such information. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REVOCATION OF SECURITY CLEARANCE FOR 

4 PERSONS THAT DISCLOSE CLASSIFIED IN5 FORMATION. 

6 Title VI of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 

7 U.S.C. 421 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 

8 605 the following new section: 
2 

•HR 3305 IH 

1 ‘‘SEC. 605A. REVOCATION OF SECURITY CLEARANCE FOR 

2 PERSONS THAT DISCLOSE CLASSIFIED IN3 FORMATION. 

4 ‘‘(a) Any Federal employee who discloses, or has dis5 closed, classified information, including the identity of a 

6 covert agent of the Central Intelligence Agency, to a per7 son not authorized to receive such information shall not 

8 be permitted to hold a security clearance for access to such 

9 information.’’. 

Æ
### §10101. Definitions

In this part—

(1) "master" means the individual having command of a vessel.

(2) "owner" means the person to whom the vessel belongs.

(3) "seaman" means an individual (except scientific personnel, a sailing school instructor, or a sailing school student) engaged or employed in any capacity on board a vessel.

(4) "fishing vessel" includes—

(A) a fish tender vessel; or

(B) a fish processing vessel entered into service before January 1, 1988, and not more than 1,600 gross tons as measured under section 14502 of this title, or an alternate tonnage measured under section 14302 of this title as prescribed by the Secretary under section 14104 of this title or entered into service after December 31, 1987, and having not more than 16 individuals on board primarily employed in the preparation of fish or fish products.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 560; Pub. L. 98–364, title IV, §402(13), July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 449; Pub. L. 98–557, §33(d), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2876; Pub. L. 99–640, §10(b)(3), Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3550; Pub. L. 104–324, title VII, §736, Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3941.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 10101 | 46:713 |

Section 10101 defines the terms master, seaman, and owner as they apply to merchant seamen's protection and relief.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Par. (4)(B). Pub. L. 104–324 inserted "as measured under section 14502 of this title, or an alternate tonnage measured under section 14302 of this title as prescribed by the Secretary under section 14104 of this title" after "1,600 gross tons".

1986—Pars. (1), (3). Pub. L. 99–640 struck out "owned by a citizen of the United States" after "vessel".

1984—Par. (4). Pub. L. 98–364, as amended Pub. L. 98–557, added par. (4).