alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of JCC Holding Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, L.
Camille Fowler, Vice President - Finance, Treasurer and Secretary of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date: November 14, 2002                            /s/ L. Camille Fowler
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   L. Camille Fowler
                                                   Vice President - Finance,
                                                   Treasurer and Secretary
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SendTec, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for
the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul Soltoff, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Paul Soltoff             
|Paul Soltoff                 
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)
|                             
|June 20, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TCI
SATELLITE ENTERTAINMENT INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         463,133
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 798,921
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        67,745
<OTHER-SE>                                     268,043
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   798,921
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               168,500
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,082
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                65,105
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,177
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (102,096)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (102,096)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (102,096)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.51)
        

</TABLE>
#### Mae L. Lechner et al., Appellants, v. Frank Lechner, Respondent. Frank Lechner, Plaintiff, v. Louise Lechner et al., Defendants. Lana Estates, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Frank Lechner, Defendant.

Oral motion by appellants to extend time to perfect appeal and to dispense with printing, denied. *817Oral cross motion by respondent to dismiss appeal, granted and appeal dismissed ; appellants having failed to comply with an order of this court, dated November 7, 1960, requiring them to perfect their appeal for the January 1961 Term. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
#### § 943.100 What is the purpose of this part?

This part authorizes public housing agencies (PHAs) to form consortia, joint ventures, affiliates, subsidiaries, partnerships, and other business arrangements under section 13 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437k). Under this authority, PHAs participating in a consortium enter into a consortium agreement, submit joint PHA Plans to HUD, and may combine all or part of their funding and program administration. This part does not preclude a PHA from entering cooperative arrangements to operate its programs under other authority, as long as they are consistent with other program regulations and requirements.
§ 905.316 Procurement and contract requirements. ( a ) *General.* PHAs shall comply with 2 CFR part 200, and HUD implementing instructions, for all capital activities including modernization and development, except as provided in paragraph (c) in this section.
( b ) *Contracts.* The PHA shall use all contract forms prescribed by HUD. If a form is not prescribed, the PHA may use any Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved form that contains all applicable federal requirements and contract clauses.
( c ) *Mixed-finance development projects.* Mixed-finance development partners may be selected in accordance with 24 CFR 905.604(h). Contracts and other agreements with mixed-finance development partners must specify that they comply with the requirements of §§ 905.602 and 905.604 of this part.
( d ) *Assurances of completion.* Notwithstanding 24 CFR 85.36 (as revised April 1, 2013), for each construction contract over $100,000, the contractor shall furnish the PHA with the following: ( 1 ) A bid guarantee from each bidder, equivalent to 5 percent of the bid price; and
( 2 ) One of the following: ( i ) A performance bond and payment bond for 100 percent of the contract price;
( ii ) A performance bond and a payment bond, each for 50 percent or more of the contract price;
( iii ) A 20 percent cash escrow;
( iv ) A 10 percent irrevocable letter of credit with terms acceptable to HUD, or
( v ) Any other payment method acceptable to HUD.
( e ) *Procurement of recovered materials.* PHAs that are state agencies and agencies of a political subdivision of a state that are using assistance under this part for procurement, and any person contracting with such PHAs with respect to work performed under an assisted contract, must comply with the requirements of section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. In accordance with section 6002, these agencies and persons must procure items designated in guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at 40 CFR part 247 that contain the highest percentage of recovered material practicable, consistent with maintaining a satisfactory level of competition, where the purchase price of the item exceeds $10,000 or the value of the quantity acquired in the preceding fiscal year exceeded $10,000; must procure solid waste management services in a manner that promotes energy and resource recovery; and must have established an affirmative procurement program for procurement of recovered materials identified in the EPA guidelines.
[78 FR 63770, Oct. 24, 2013, as amended at 80 FR 75942, Dec. 7, 2015]
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Frank McGill,  Chief Executive Officer of Zeno Inc., certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002,  that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Zeno Inc., for the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934  and  that  the  information
contained in the Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB  fairly  presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Zeno Inc.


/s/ Frank McGill
---------------------------
Frank McGill
Chief Executive Officer
August 8, 2005
```

                                                                                                       Exhibit 99.1

NEWS RELEASE

Media Contact:             Roy Wiley         630-753-2627
Investor Contact:          Ramona Long        630-753-2406

 NAVISTAR COMPLETES SALE OF $190 MILLION IN SENIOR CONVERTIBLE BONDS; PROCEEDS WILL BE USED TO REPAY EXISTING DEBT

         WARRENVILLE, Ill. - December 11, 2002 - Navistar International Corporation (NYSE: NAV) announced today
that it has priced $190 million of new senior convertible bonds to be sold in a private placement.
         Of the net proceeds, $100 million will be used to repay the aggregate principal amount of existing 7.0
percent senior notes due February 1, 2003. The remaining funds will be used to repay other existing debt. The
bonds will be sold in a private placement and priced to yield 2.5 percent with a conversion premium of 30.0
percent on a closing price of $26.70.
         The securities offered will not be or have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and may
not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration
requirements.
         Simultaneous with the issuance of the convertible bonds, Navistar will enter into two derivative
contracts, the consequences of which will allow the Company to eliminate share dilution associated with the
convertible debt from the conversion price of the bond up to a 100 percent premium over the share price at
issuance. The maturity and terms of the derivatives match the maturity of the convertible bonds. These contracts
are not expected to affect earnings per share.
         In connection with this arrangement, the seller of the derivative has informed Navistar that it intends
to purchase Navistar common shares in open-market transactions upon completion of the distribution of the
convertible bonds.
         Headquartered in Warrenville, Ill., Navistar International Corporation (NYSE: NAV) is the parent company
of International Truck and Engine Corporation, a leading producer of mid-range diesel engines, medium trucks,
heavy trucks, severe service vehicles and a provider of parts and service sold under the International® brand. IC
Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary, produces school buses.  The company also is a private label designer and
manufacturer of diesel engines for the pickup truck, van and SUV markets. Additionally, through a joint venture
with Ford Motor Company, the company will build medium commercial trucks and currently sells truck and diesel
engine service parts.  International Truck and Engine has the broadest distribution network in the industry.
Financing for customers and dealers is provided through a wholly owned subsidiary. Additional information can be
found on the company's web site at www.nav-international.com
                                   -------------------------

                                                        E-1
```
§ 266.205 Ineligible projects. The following projects and facilities are not eligible for insurance under this part: ( a ) *Transient housing or hotels.* Rental for transient or hotel purposes. For purposes of this part, rental for transient or hotel purposes means: ( 1 ) Rental for any period less than 30 calendar days, or
( 2 ) Any rental, if the occupants of the housing accommodations are provided customary hotel services such as room service for food and beverages, maid service, furnishing and laundering of linens, or valet service.
( b ) *Projects in military impact areas.* A project located in a military impact area, as determined by HUD. A military impact area is generally a small or medium size metropolitan housing market area or a remote or isolated nonmetropolitan area where: ( 1 ) Military-connected households comprise 25 percent or more of the total households in the market area. Military-connected households include active duty military personnel, civilian employees of the military service (Department of Defense) or other Federal agency at or in support of the installation, and employees of contractors and sub-contractors directly associated with the military installation, and their dependents. Unaccompanied active duty military personnel housed in military-controlled group quarters housing (barracks, BOQ's) are excluded; and
( 2 ) There is concern about the continued stability of the current level of military strength and mission at the installation based on public announcements from the U.S. Department of Defense or the military service of impending changes; and
( 3 ) The complete reduction of military-connected households living in nonmilitary rental housing over a 5 year period, at an annual average decline of 20 percent, would, taking into account growth in the civilian economy and normal changes in the housing inventory, cause an adverse impact on the private rental market resulting in an increase in the rental vacancy rate in the housing market of 10 percent or more at the end of that period.
( c ) *Retirement service centers.* Projects designed for the elderly with extensive services and luxury accommodations that provide for central kitchens and dining rooms with food service or mandatory services.
( d ) *Nursing homes or intermediate care facilities.* Nursing homes and intermediate care facilities licensed and regulated by State or local government and providing nursing and medical care.
[59 FR 62524, Dec. 5, 1994, as amended at 85 FR 83442, Dec. 22, 2020]
EXHIBIT 99.2 -- Report of Independent Accountants

(a)



[KPMG logo]
		KPMG LLP
		2500 Ruan Center
		666 Grand Avenue
		Des Moines, IA 60309


		Independent Accountants' Report


The Board of Directors
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, a
division of Wells Fargo Bank, NA:


We have examined management's assertion, included in
the accompanying Assertion of Management of Wells
Fargo Home Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A. (the Company), that the Company complied with
the minimum servicing standards set forth in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP)
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004. Management
is responsible for the Company's compliance with those
minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with
attestation standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis,
evidence about the Company's compliance with the
minimum servicing standards specified above and
performing such other procedures, as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Our examination does not provide a legal determination
on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company
complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing
standards as of and for the year ended December 31,
2004 is fairly stated, in all material respects.



/s/ KPMG LLP

February 23,2005
#### Edith M. Braun, Appellant, v Thomas Melia et al., Respondents.

[833 NYS2d 664]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Weber, J), dated May 2, 2006, which granted the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that she did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), and, in effect, denied, as academic, her motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, (1) by deleting the provision thereof granting the defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), and substituting therefor a provision denying the cross motion; and (2) by deleting the provision thereof which, in effect, denied, as academic, the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for a determination of the plaintiffs motion on the merits.

The defendants established prima facie that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury from the subject accident (see Insurance Law § 5102 [d]; *Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345, 353 [2002]). However, in opposition, the plaintiff raised an issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Schmidt, J.E, Krausman, Goldstein, Covello and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3091 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3091

    To extend temporarily the duty suspension on 4,4'-Oxydiphthalic 
                           Anhydride (ODPA).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 28, 2005

  Mr. Hobson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend temporarily the duty suspension on 4,4'-Oxydiphthalic 
                           Anhydride (ODPA).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.05.13 of subchapter II of chapter 99 
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, relating to 
4,4'-Oxydiphthalic Anhydride (CAS # 1823-59-2) is amended by striking 
12/31/2006 and inserting 12/31/2009.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 570.708 Sanctions. ( a ) *Non-State assisted public entities.* The performance review procedures described in subpart O of this part apply to all public entities receiving guaranteed loan funds other than State-assisted public entities. Performance deficiencies in the use of guaranteed loan funds made available to such public entities (or program income derived therefrom) or violations of the contract entered into pursuant to § 570.705(b)(1) may result in the imposition of a sanction authorized pursuant to § 570.900(b)(7) against pledged CDBG grants. In addition, upon a finding by HUD that the public entity has failed to comply substantially with any provision of the Act with respect to either the pledged grants or the guaranteed loan funds or program income, HUD may take action against the pledged grants as provided in § 570.913 and/or may take action as provided in the contract for loan guarantee assistance.
( b ) *State-assisted public entities.* Performance deficiencies in the use of guaranteed loan funds (or program income derived therefrom) or violations of the contract entered into pursuant to § 570.705(b)(1) may result in an action authorized pursuant to § 570.495 or § 570.496. In addition, upon a finding by HUD that the State or public entity has failed to comply substantially with any provision of the Act with respect to the pledged CDBG nonentitlement funds, the guaranteed loan funds, or program income, HUD may take action against the pledged funds as provided in § 570.496 and/or may take action as provided in the contract.
### §8903. Self-propelled, uninspected passenger vessels

A self-propelled, uninspected passenger vessel shall be operated by an individual licensed by the Secretary to operate that type of vessel, under prescribed regulations.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 555; Pub. L. 99–307, §1(14)(B), (C), May 19, 1986, 100 Stat. 446.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 8903 | 46:1461(e), (f) |

Section 8903 requires that an uninspected passenger vessel be operated by a licensed individual for that type of vessel.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1986—Pub. L. 99–307 substituted "Self-propelled, uninspected" for "Uninspected" in section catchline and "A self-propelled," for "An" in text.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1315 

CA 15-00178 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

COMPTROLLER OF STATE OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE 

FOR THE NEW YORK STATE COMMON RETIREMENT FUND, 

PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LEVEL ACRES LLC, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, 

ET AL., DEFENDANTS. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

MCNAMEE, LOCHNER, TITUS & WILLIAMS, P.C., ALBANY (FRANCIS J. SMITH OF

COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. 

PEKAREK LAW GROUP, P.C., WELLSVILLE (EDWARD PEKAREK OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Allegany County

(Thomas P. Brown, A.J.), entered November 6, 2014. The order denied

the motion of plaintiff for summary judgment. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs.

Same memorandum as in Comptroller of State of New York v Level

Acres LLC ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Dec. 31, 2015]). 

Entered: December 31, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court