alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL Case Nos. C 08-5481 VRW 

 C 09-1909 VRW 

 C 09-5360 VRW 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Robert E. Rohde 

Washington Bar No. 12809 

Admitted Pro Hac Vice 

Email: brohde@rohdelaw.com 

Gregory G. Schwartz (Cal. SBN 206134) 

Email: gschwartz@rohdelaw.com 

ROHDE & VAN KAMPEN PLLC 

1001 Fourth Avenue, Suite 4050 

Seattle, Washington 98154 

Telephone: (206) 386-7353 

Facsimile: (206) 405-2825 

Michael James Cronen 

Cal. State Bar No. 131087 

ZIMMERMAN & CRONEN, LLP 

1330 Broadway, Suite 710 

Oakland, CA 94612 

Tel: (510) 465-0828 

Fax: (510) 465-2041 

E-mail: mcronen@zimpatent.com 

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant.& Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, 

DATA RETRIEVAL TECHNOLOGY, LLC 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SYBASE, INC. and INFORMATICA 

CORPORATION, 

 

 Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants, 

 v. 

DATA RETRIEVAL TECHNOLOGY, LLC, 

 Defendant/Counterclaimant. 

Case Nos. C 08-5481 VRW 

 C 09-1909 VRW 

 C 09-5360 VRW 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL 

DATA RETRIEVAL TECHNOLOGY, LLC, 

 

 Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, 

 v. 

SYBASE, INC. and INFORMATICA 

CORPORATION, 

 Defendants/Counterclaimants. 

Case 3:09-cv-01909-JCS Document 83 Filed 06/11/10 Page 1 of 2
- 1 - 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL Case Nos. C 08-5481 VRW 

 C 09-1909 VRW 

 C 09-5360 VRW 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Defendant and Counterclaimant Data Retrieval Technology, LLC consents to and substitutes as 

its local counsel in the above-captioned action the law firm of Harvey Siskind LLP, 4 Embarcadero 

Center, 39th Floor, San Francisco, California 94111, telephone number (415) 354-0100 and facsimile 

number (415) 3391-7124, in place of Zimmerman & Cronen, LLP. 

Having considered the Notice of Substitution of Counsel, and finding good cause therefore, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that the law firm of Harvey Siskind LLP is substituted as local counsel in place 

and instead of Zimmerman & Cronen, LLP. 

 

Dated: ____________________________________ 

 Honorable Vaughn R. Walker 

 United States District Court 

 

Case 3:09-cv-01909-JCS Document 83 Filed 06/11/10 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Shengtai Pharmaceutical, Inc., the “Company,” on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the “Report,” I, Qingtai Liu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.       That the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: October 6, 2011





SHENGTAI PHARMACEUTICAL, INC./s/ Qingtai LiuQingtai LiuChief Executive Officer
Docket: EPA - HQ - OAR- 2010 - 0295 NSPS for Stationary Compression Ignition Engines - Amendments Comment On: EPA - HQ - OAR- 2010 - 0295 - 0001 Standards of Performance for Stationary Compression Ignition and Spark Ignition Internal Combustion Engines Document: EPA - HQ - OAR- 2010 - 0295 - 0034 Comment submitted by D. Meierhenry 

## Submitter Information General Comment Docket EPA - HQ - OAR- 2010 - 0295 Standards of Performance for Stationary Compressions Ignition and Spark Ignition Internal Combustion Engines. Dear Sir or Madam: Thank - you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed performance standards for stationary compression and spark ignition engines. 1. 60.4211(f)(4) and 60.4243(d)(4) specify compliance requirements for emergency CI and SI engines, respectively. These sections both state. “ The engine may not be operated for more than 30 minutes prior to the time when the emergency condition is expected to occur, and the engine operation must be terminated immediately after the facility is notified that the emergency condition is no longer imminent. ” I disagree with the need for these limitations and foresee arguments over the meaning of “ immediately ” , and why 30 minutes is an acceptable period but 31 minutes is not, and what criteria are used to determine “when the emergency condition is expected to occur” , and the criteria for determining “ that the emergency condition is no longer imminent” . Although I have no proof, I do not believe the majority of sources are interested in operating their emergency generators any longer than necessary. I suggest the time limits be deleted (or retained only as guidelines) and the EPA specify the operating record must clearly indicate when and why a generator was operated. 2. In the definition of emergency stationary internal combustion engine in 60.4219, the reference to 60.4211(e) should be changed to 60.4211(f). I appreciate your consideration of these comments. David Meierhenry Sioux City, IA dmhen@cableone.net 

# PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: August 30, 2010 Tracking No. 80b37841 Comments Due: September 08, 2010 Page 1 of 1

12/16/2010 file://C:\Program Files\Documentum\CTS\docbases\ProDocbase\config\temp_sessions\4223846338735661369\ ...
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Bell, Appellant.

Order entered on October 11, 1961 unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Concur-—Rabin, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
| Exhibit 99.1 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors Bank of Hawaii We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report of Management, that Bank of Hawaii (the "Company") complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's *Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers* ("USAP") for the year ended December 31, 2004. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about Bank of Hawaii's compliance based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with specified requirements. In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned requirements for the year ended December 31, 2004 is fairly stated, in all material respects. ***Ernst & Young LLP***Honolulu, Hawaii March 21, 2005 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### §56308. Transfer of substitute vessels

In the case of any vessel constructed in the United States after January 1, 1937, which has been taken by the United States for use in any manner, the Secretary of Transportation, if in his opinion the transfer would aid in carrying out the policies of this Act,1 is authorized to transfer to the owner of such vessel another vessel which is deemed by the Secretary to be of comparable type with adjustments for depreciation and difference in design or speed, and to the extent applicable, such other adjustments and terms and conditions, including transfer of mortgage obligations in favor of the United States binding upon the old vessel, as the Secretary may prescribe.

(Added and amended Pub. L. 115–91, div. C, title XXXV, §3502(a)(2), (b)(5), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1910.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, means act Mar. 8, 1946, ch. 82, 60 Stat. 41, known as the Merchant Ship Sales Act of 1946, which was classified principally to chapter 54 (§4401 et seq.) of Title 50, War and National Defense. The Act has been repealed, except for sections 8(d) and 11, which were transferred to this section and section 57100 of this title, respectively, by Pub. L. 115–91. Provisions relating to the policies of the Act were contained in section 4401 of Title 50 prior to repeal by Pub. L. 115–91.

#### Codification

Section, as added and amended by Pub. L. 115–91, is based on act Mar. 8, 1946, ch. 82, §8(d), 60 Stat. 46, as amended by Pub. L. 97–31, §12(154), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 167, which was formerly classified to section 4404(d) of Title 50, War and National Defense, before being transferred to this chapter and renumbered as this section.

#### Amendments

2017—Pub. L. 115–91, §3502(b)(5)(C), which directed striking out "adjustments with respect to the retained vessels as provided for in section 9, and", was executed by striking out "adjustments with respect to the retained vessel as provided for in section 9, and" after "extent applicable," to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

Pub. L. 115–91, §3502(b)(5)(B), which directed insertion of "of Transportation" after "Secretary", was executed by making the insertion after "Secretary" the first time appearing to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

Pub. L. 115–91, §3502(b)(5)(A), inserted section enumerator and catchline.

Pub. L. 115–91, §3502(a)(2), transferred section 8(d) of act Mar. 8, 1946, to this chapter and renumbered it as this section. See Codification note above.

1 See References in Text note below.
§ 964.230 Audit and administrative requirements. ( a ) *TOP grant recipients.* The HUD Inspector General, the Comptroller General of the United States, or any duly authorized representative shall have access to all records required to be retained by this subpart or by any agreement with HUD for the purpose of audit or other examinations. ( 1 ) Grant recipients must comply with the requirements of 2 CFR part 200, as applicable.
( 2 ) A final audit shall be required of the financial statements made pursuant to this subpart by a Certified Public Accountant (CPA), in accordance with generally accepted government audit standards. A written report of the audit must be forwarded to HUD within 60 days of issuance.
( b ) *Resident management corporations.* Resident management corporations who have entered into a contract with a HA with respect to management of a development(s) must comply with the requirements of 2 CFR part 200, as applicable. Resident management corporations managing a development(s) must be audited annually by a licensed certified public accountant, designated by the corporation, in accordance with generally accepted government audit standards. A written report of each audit must be forwarded to HUD and the HA within 30 days of issuance. These requirements are in addition to any other Federal law or other requirement that would apply to the availability and audit of books and records of resident management corporations under this part.
[59 FR 43636, Aug. 24, 1994, as amended at 80 FR 75942, Dec. 7, 2015]
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. ("Company") Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 ("Report"), the
undersigned certifies that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 16, 2009

By: /s/ Debi Kokinos
--------------------
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 982
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999, and at 89 FR 38293, May 7, 2024.

§ 982.155 Administrative fee reserve. ( a ) The PHA must maintain an administrative fee reserve (formerly “operating reserve”) for the program. There is a single administrative fee reserve for the PHA program. The PHA must credit to the administrative fee reserve the total of: ( 1 ) The amount by which program administrative fees paid by HUD for a PHA fiscal year exceed the PHA program administrative expenses for the fiscal year; plus
( 2 ) Interest earned on the administrative fee reserve.
( b ) ( 1 ) The PHA must use funds in the administrative fee reserve to pay program administrative expenses in excess of administrative fees paid by HUD for a PHA fiscal year. If funds in the administrative fee reserve are not needed to cover PHA administrative expenses (to the end of the last expiring funding increment under the consolidated ACC), the PHA may use these funds for other housing purposes permitted by State and local law. However, HUD may prohibit use of the funds for certain purposes.
( 2 ) The PHA Board of Commissioners or other authorized officials must establish the maximum amount that may be charged against the administrative fee reserve without specific approval.
( 3 ) If the PHA has not adequately administered any Section 8 program, HUD may prohibit use of funds in the administrative fee reserve, and may direct the PHA to use funds in the reserve to improve administration of the program or to reimburse ineligible expenses.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2577-0169) [60 FR 34695, July 3, 1995, as amended at 60 FR 45661, Sept. 1, 1995; 64 FR 26642, May 14, 1999]
### Part D—Marine Casualties
### §797b. Preferential hiring

#### (a) General

Any employee who is deprived of employment shall have the first right of hire by any other railroad for a vacancy for which he is qualified in a class or craft (or in the case of a non-agreement employee, for a non-agreement vacancy) in which such employee was employed by the Corporation or a predecessor carrier for not less than one year, except where such a vacancy is covered by (1) an affirmative action plan, or a hiring plan designed to eliminate discrimination, that is required by Federal or State statute, regulation, or Executive order, or by the order of a Federal court or agency, or (2) a permissible voluntary affirmative action plan. For purposes of this section, a railroad shall not be considered to be hiring new employees when it recalls any of its own furloughed employees.

#### (b) Status

The first right of hire afforded to employees under this section shall be coequal to the first right of hire afforded under sections 907 and 1004 of this title.

(Pub. L. 93–236, title VII, §703, as added Pub. L. 97–35, title XI, §1143(a), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 663.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Exemption of National Railroad Passenger Corporation in Hiring Qualified Train and Engine Employees

Pub. L. 99–272, title IV, §4011(c), Apr. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 109, provided that: "The provisions of section 703 of the Regional Rail Reorganization Act of 1973 (45 U.S.C. 797b), section 8 of the Milwaukee Railroad Restructuring Act (45 U.S.C. 907), and section 105 of the Rock Island Railroad Transition and Employee Assistance Act (45 U.S.C. 1004) shall not apply to the National Railroad Passenger Corporation in the hiring of qualified train and engine employees who hold seniority rights to work in intercity rail passenger service in connection with the assumption by such Corporation of functions previously performed under contract by other carriers."
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Atlas America Public #14-2004 L.P. (the
"Partnership") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Freddie M. Kotek, Chief Executive Officer of the MGP, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.








By:
            /s/ Freddie M.
      KotekName:
            Freddie
      M. KotekTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            March
      30, 2009
H. R. 315

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and six 

An Act 

To designate the United States courthouse at 300 North Hogan Street, Jacksonville, 

Florida, as the ‘‘John Milton Bryan Simpson United States Courthouse’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The United States courthouse at 300 North Hogan Street, 

Jacksonville, Florida, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘John 

Milton Bryan Simpson United States Courthouse’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the United States courthouse 

referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the 

‘‘John Milton Bryan Simpson United States Courthouse’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey

USGS Fa

Printed on recycled paper

Introduction

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) recently completed an 

assessment of the undiscovered oil and gas potential of the UintaPiceance Province of northwestern Colorado and northeastern Utah 

(fig. 1). The assessment of the Uinta-Piceance Province is geology 

based and uses the Total Petroleum System concept. The geologic 

elements of Total Petroleum Systems include hydrocarbon source 

rocks (source rock maturation, hydrocarbon generation and migration), reservoir rocks (sequence stratigraphy, petrophysical properties), and hydrocarbon traps (trap formation and timing). Using this 

geologic framework, the USGS defined five Total Petroleum Systems 

and 20 Assessment Units within these Total Petroleum Systems, and 

quantitatively estimated the undiscovered oil and gas resources within 

each Assessment Unit (table 1).

Resource Summary

The USGS assessed undiscovered conventional oil and gas and 

continuous (unconventional) oil and gas, including coal-bed gas 

(CBG in table 1). The USGS estimated a mean of 21 trillion cubic 

feet of gas (TCFG), a mean of 60 million barrels of oil (MMBO), 

and a mean of 43 million barrels of natural gas liquids (MMBNGL) 

in five Total Petroleum Systems. Nearly all of the undiscovered 

gas resource is continuous (unconventional) rather than 

Of the 21 TCFG, 13 TCFG is estimated to be in the M

Total Petroleum System, and 7 TCFG is in the Mancos

Petroleum System. The Ferron/Wasatch Plateau Total 

System and Mesaverde Total Petroleum System are est

contain 2.3 TCFG of coal-bed gas. The Phosphoria an

Total Petroleum Systems contain the balance of the und

gas resource.

For Further Information

Supporting geologic studies of Total Petroleum Syst

and Assessment Units, and the methodology used in the 

Piceance Province assessment are in progress. Assessm

results are available at the USGS Central Energy Team 

 http://energy.cr.usgs.gov/oilgas/noga/

Uinta-Piceance Assessment Team 

Mark A. Kirschbaum (Task Leader; mkirsch@usg

Anna, Timothy S. Collett, Troy Cook, Russell F. Dubiel

M. Finn, Robert D. Hettinger, Mitchell Henry, Edward A

Ronald C. Johnson, Paul G. Lillis, Philip H. Nelson, Vit

Cynthia A. Rice, Laura N.R. Roberts, and Stephen B. R

Geological Survey 

estimates a mean of 

21 trillion cubic feet of 

undiscovered natural 

gas and a mean of 

60 million barrels of 

undiscovered oil in 

the Uinta-Piceance 

Province. Nearly all 

of the undiscovered 

gas resource is 

unconventional 

(continuous).

Figure 1. Uinta-Piceance Province located in northwestern Colorado and northeastern Utah. The Douglas Creek arch 

Piceance Basin from Uinta Basin. The Wasatch Plateau is included in this province.
Exhibit 10(ddd)

                    Manhattan Financial Group
                   1147 Manhattan Avenue, #134
                    Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
                                 

To: David B. Johnston
From: Daron C. Dillia
Dated: February 8, 1999

RE:       144 Investment

Manhattan Financial Group (MFG) agrees on or before March 15, 1999 to provide
Computerized Thermal Imaging, Inc. (CTI) with a minimum investment of $250,000
and a maximum investment of $1,250,000 for the purchase of CTI common stock
subject to rule #144 of the SEC act of 1933.  As consideration for such
investment CTI will allow MFG to purchase the common stock at 50% of the low
bid price during the time period (2/8/99 to 3/15/99).  The stock purchased
will be br granted piggy back registration rights.

/s/ Daron C. Dillia 
---------------------------------------------
Daron C. Dillia dba Manhattan Financial Group


Agreed:

/s/ David B. Johnston
-------------------------------------------- 
David B. Johnston - CEO
Computerized Thermal Imaging