alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §9602. Designation of additional hazardous substances and establishment of reportable released quantities; regulations

(a) The Administrator shall promulgate and revise as may be appropriate, regulations designating as hazardous substances, in addition to those referred to in section 9601(14) of this title, such elements, compounds, mixtures, solutions, and substances which, when released into the environment may present substantial danger to the public health or welfare or the environment, and shall promulgate regulations establishing that quantity of any hazardous substance the release of which shall be reported pursuant to section 9603 of this title. The Administrator may determine that one single quantity shall be the reportable quantity for any hazardous substance, regardless of the medium into which the hazardous substance is released. For all hazardous substances for which proposed regulations establishing reportable quantities were published in the Federal Register under this subsection on or before March 1, 1986, the Administrator shall promulgate under this subsection final regulations establishing reportable quantities not later than December 31, 1986. For all hazardous substances for which proposed regulations establishing reportable quantities were not published in the Federal Register under this subsection on or before March 1, 1986, the Administrator shall publish under this subsection proposed regulations establishing reportable quantities not later than December 31, 1986, and promulgate final regulations under this subsection establishing reportable quantities not later than April 30, 1988."

(b) Unless and until superseded by regulations establishing a reportable quantity under subsection (a) of this section for any hazardous substance as defined in section 9601(14) of this title, (1) a quantity of one pound, or (2) for those hazardous substances for which reportable quantities have been established pursuant to section 1321(b)(4) of title 33, such reportable quantity, shall be deemed that quantity, the release of which requires notification pursuant to section 9603(a) or (b) of this title.

(Pub. L. 96–510, title I, §102, Dec. 11, 1980, 94 Stat. 2772; Pub. L. 99–499, title I, §102, Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1617.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1986—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–499 inserted provisions setting deadlines for promulgation of proposed and final regulations.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 31, 2023

NO. 03

- 23

- 00352

- CV

Jimmie Sharlene Cruz , Appellant

v.

River Ranch , Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIAN A, AND SMITH

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on November 10, 2022 . Having

reviewed the record , the Court holds that Jimmie Sharlene Cruz has not prosecuted his appeal

and did not comply with a notice from the C lerk of this C ourt

. Therefore, the Court dismisses

the app eal for want o f prosecution. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no

adjudica t i on of costs is made.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[CASE. NO. C09-02385 (EDL)] Page 1

Teresa S. Renaker, Cal. Bar No. 187800

James P. Keenley, Cal. Bar. No. 253106

LEWIS, FEINBERG, LEE, RENAKER & JACKSON, P.C.

1330 Broadway, Suite 1800

Oakland, CA 94612

Telephone: (510) 839-6824

Facsimile: (510) 839-7839

trenaker@lewisfeinberg.com

jkeenley@lewisfeinberg.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO / OAKLAND DIVISION

SUSAN SCANDRETT,

Plaintiff,

vs.

THE STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY,

Nominal Defendant,

and

LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR

EMPLOYEES OF FOUNDATION FOR

NATIONAL PROGRESS,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C09-02385 (EDL)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH

PREJUDICE.

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), Plaintiff SUSAN SCANDRETT, Defendant LONG

TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF FOUNDATION FOR NATIONAL

PROGRESS, and Nominal Defendant THE STANDARD INSURANCE COMAPNY, by and

through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate that this matter be dismissed with

prejudice, each party to bear its own costs of suit and attorneys’ fees.

//

//

Case 3:09-cv-02385-EDL Document 17 Filed 01/05/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:09-cv-02385-EDL Document16 Filed01/04/10 Page1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[CASE. NO. C09-02385 (EDL)] Page 2

Dated: January 4, 2010 Respectfully submitted,

LEWIS, FEINBERG, LEE,

RENAKER & JACKSON P.C.

By: /s/ James P. Keenley

James P. Keenley

Teresa S. Renaker

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: January 4, 2010 BUCHANAN, ANGELI, ALTSCHUL & 

SULLIVAN LLP

By: /s/

Andrew M. Altshul

Attorneys for Defendant and Nominal

Defendant

[PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ________________

HON. ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case3:09-cv-02385-EDL Document16 Filed01/04/10 Page2 of 2

January 5, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-02385-EDL Document 17 Filed 01/05/10 Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 25, 2019

t0918 

# Order

Clerk September 25, 2019

158829

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 158829

COA: 338452

Oakland CC: 2017

- 261673

- FC

GARY TREMAYNE HOLLINS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 20, 2018

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>



                                   EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Home City Financial Corporation, (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
we, J. William Stapleton, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating
Officer, and Charles A. Mihal, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ J. William Stapleton                          /s/ Charles A. Mihal
--------------------------------                  -------------------------
J. William Stapleton, President,                  Charles A. Mihal
Chief Executive Officer and                       Treasurer and Chief Financial
Chief Operating Officer                           Officer


Date:       August 10, 2004                       Date:     August 10, 2004
        -----------------------                          ---------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Home City Financial Corporation and will be retained by Home City
Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.




                                       22
§ 960.601 Definitions. ( a ) *Definitions found elsewhere* — ( 1 ) *General definitions.* The following terms are defined in part 5, subpart A of this title: *public housing, public housing agency* (PHA).
( 2 ) *Definitions concerning income and rent.* The following terms are defined in part 5, subpart F of this title: *economic self-sufficiency program, work activities.*
( b ) *Other definitions.* In addition to the definitions in paragraph (a) of this section, the following definitions apply:
*Community service.* The performance of voluntary work or duties that are a public benefit, and that serve to improve the quality of life, enhance resident self-sufficiency, or increase resident self-responsibility in the community. Community service is not employment and may not include political activities.
*Exempt individual.* An adult who: ( 1 ) Is 62 years or older;
( 2 ) ( i ) Is a blind or disabled individual, as defined under Section 216(i)(1) or Section 1614 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 416(i)(1); 1382c), and who certifies that because of this disability she or he is unable to comply with the service provisions of this subpart, or
( ii ) Is a primary caretaker of such individual;
( 3 ) Is engaged in work activities;
( 4 ) Meets the requirements for being exempted from having to engage in a work activity under the State program funded under part A of title IV of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 601 *et seq.*) or under any other welfare program of the State in which the PHA is located, including a State-administered welfare-to-work program;
( 5 ) Is a member of a family receiving assistance, benefits or services under a State program funded under part A of title IV of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 601 *et seq.*) or under any other welfare program of the State in which the PHA is located, including a State-administered welfare-to-work program, and has not been found by the State or other administering entity to be in noncompliance with such a program; or
( 6 ) is a member of a non-public housing over-income family.
*Service requirement.* The obligation of each adult resident, other than an exempt individual, to perform community service or participate in an economic-self sufficiency program required in accordance with § 960.603.
[65 FR 16729, Mar. 29, 2000, as amended at 88 FR 9675, Feb. 14, 2023]
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

General Communication, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 33-60728 and No. 33-60222) on Form S-8 of General Communication, Inc. of our reports dated March 6, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of General Communication, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, which reports appear in the December 31, 2007, annual report on Form 10-K of General Communication, Inc.

 

Our report dated March 6, 2008, refers to the adoption of the fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” effective January 1, 2006 and a change in the method of quantifying errors in 2006 to conform to Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements When Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements.”

 

Our report dated March 6, 2008, on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, expresses our opinion that General Communication, Inc. did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007 because of the effect of two material weaknesses on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria and contains an explanatory paragraph that states that General Communication, Inc.’s internal controls were inadequately designed resulting in material weaknesses with respect to: (i) Information Technology Program Development and Change Controls over the Unified Billing System and Related Monitoring Controls, and (ii) Share-Based Payment Arrangements.

 

Our report dated March 6, 2008, on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, contains an explanatory paragraph that states the Company excluded Alaska Digitel, LLC’s internal control over financial reporting from its assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of General Communication, Inc. also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Alaska DigiTel, LLC.

 

 (signed) KPMG LLP

 

Anchorage, Alaska

March 6, 2008
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 23, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00513-CV

BENEDICT EMESOWUM, Appellant

V.

CHRISTMAS EVE MORGAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1061501

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an attempted appeal from an order sustaining a contest to appellant’s 

affidavit of indigence. The clerk’s record was filed June 19, 2015. The record 

reflects that no final judgment has been entered in this case. Generally, appeals 

may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 

191, 195 (Tex. 2001). 

On July 3, 2015, notification was transmitted to the parties of this court’s 
2

intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a 

response on or before July 14, 2015, demonstrating grounds for continuing the 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). On July 10, 2015, appellant filed an 

“Amended Notice of Appeal and Statement on Jurisdiction,” in which he stated 

that he “prematurely filed a timely appeal of his denial of indigency by the trial 

court.” Appellant stated that the trial court issued a “final order” sustaining the 

contest to his affidavit on July 7, 2015. Appellant states that he is appealing the 

trial court’s order sustaining a contest to his affidavit of indigence. 

Appellant’s response fails to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction over 

the appeal. There is no statutory grant of the right to immediately appeal, before 

entry of final judgment, the matter about which appellant complains. See, e.g., Tex. 

Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014; Kilsby v. Mid Century Ins. Co. of Texas, 

14-07-00981-CV, 2008 WL 889428, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Apr. 

3, 2008, no pet.) (mem. op.) (dismissing appeal of order sustaining a contest to 

pauper’s oath when no final judgment had been entered).

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown, and Wise.
### §1014. New career training assistance

#### (a) Eligible employees

An employee who elects to receive a separation allowance under an employee protection agreement entered into or a benefit schedule prescribed under section 1005 of this title may, if so provided under such agreement or benefit schedule, receive from the Board reasonable expenses for training in qualified institutions for new career opportunities.

#### (b) Conditions for assistance

To be eligible for assistance under this section, an employee—

(1) must first exhaust any Federal educational benefits available to such employee under any existing program; and

(2) must begin his course of training within 2 years following the date of such employee's separation from employment with the Rock Island Railroad.

#### (c) Determination of reasonable expenses by Board

Reasonable expenses for assistance under this section shall be determined by the Board on the basis of an application therefor filed by an employee with the Board.

#### (d) Assistance prohibited after April 1, 1984

No assistance may be provided under this section after April 1, 1984.

#### (e) Definitions

As used in this section—

(1) the term "expenses" means actual, reasonable expenses paid for room, board, tuition, fees, or educational material in an amount not to exceed $3,000; and

(2) the term "qualified institution" means an educational institution accredited for payment by the Veterans' Administration under chapter 36 of title 38, or a State-accredited institution which has been in existence for not less than 2 years.

(Pub. L. 96–254, title I, §119(a)–(e), May 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 408; Pub. L. 97–468, title II, §233, Jan. 14, 1983, 96 Stat. 2547.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of subsecs. (a) to (e) of section 119 of Pub. L. 96–254. Subsec. (f) of section 119 amended section 911 of this title.

#### Amendments

1983—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97–468 substituted "under an employee protection agreement entered into or a benefit schedule prescribed under section 1005 of this title may, if so provided under such agreement or benefit schedule," for "from the Rock Island Railroad under an employee protection agreement or arrangement entered into under section 1005 of this title may".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Reference to Veterans' Administration deemed to refer to Department of Veterans Affairs pursuant to section 10 of Pub. L. 100–527, set out as a Department of Veterans Affairs Act note under section 301 of Title 38, Veterans' Benefits.
Editorial Note on Part 3282
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3282 appear at 78 FR 60199, Oct. 1, 2013.

§ 3282.453 Frequency and extent of monitoring. ( a ) The actions of all primary inspection agencies shall be monitored at a frequency adequate to assure that they are performing consistently and fulfilling their responsibilities under these regulations. Every aspect of the primary inspection agencies' performance shall be monitored.
( b ) Frequency of monitoring. The performance of each primary inspection agency shall be monitored during its period of provisional acceptance by a complete review of its records and, in the case of IPAs, by a complete inspection of the operations of at least one manufacturing plant which it has approved or in which it is operating. After the initial inspection, the performance of each primary inspection agency shall be monitored four times per year, except that the number of monitoring visits may be decreased to a minimum of one per year if the performance of the primary inspection agency is deemed by the Secretary or the Secretary's agent to be superior, and it may be increased as necessary if performance is suspect. There shall be a minimum of one review per year of the records of each primary inspection agency, and there shall be more reviews as needed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS  SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOUND  IN THE COMPANY'S  FORM 10-Q
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN  ITS ENTIRETY  BY
REFERENCE  TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000

<S>
<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                              58,228
<SECURITIES>                        238,089
<RECEIVABLES>                       161,443
<ALLOWANCES>                        34
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    0
<PP&E>                              34,934
<DEPRECIATION>                      15,169
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      501,272
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               0
<BONDS>                             149,521
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<COMMON>                            160
<OTHER-SE>                          145,280
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        501,272
<SALES>                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    64,889
<CGS>                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    50,923
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    542
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  16,331
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (2,908)
<INCOME-TAX>                        (1,207)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (1,701)
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                        (1,701)
<EPS-BASIC>                       (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.11)




</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
      3.14


**Certificate
      of Amendment**


***to***


**Certificate
      of Incorporation**


***of***


**Global
      Matrechs, Inc.**




It
      is
      hereby certified that:




1.  The
      name
      of the corporation (hereinafter called the “Corporation”) is Global Matrechs,
      Inc.




2.  That
      Article IV of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
      Corporation, as amended, be further amended to increase the number of shares
      of
      the common stock, $.0001 par value per share, authorized for issuance thereunder
      by deleting the first paragraph thereof in its entirety and replacing said
      paragraph with the following paragraph:




“ IV




The
      total
      number of shares of capital stock which the Corporation is authorized to issue
      is Nine Hundred One Million divided into two classes as follows:




(1)  Nine
      Hundred Million (900,000,000) shares of common stock, $.0001 par value per
      share
      (“Common Stock”); and




(2)  One
      Million (1,000,000) shares of preferred stock, $.01 par value per share
      (“Preferred Stock”).”




The
      remainder of Article IV shall remain unchanged.




3.  The
      amendments set forth in this Certificate of Amendment have been duly adopted
      by
      the Corporation in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of
      the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.




***[Remainder
      of page intentionally left blank]***












IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment to
      Certificate of Incorporation to be signed by Michael Sheppard, its President
      and
      Chief Executive Officer, thereto duly authorized, this 27 th day of
      April, 2006.




GLOBAL
                MATRECHS, INC.By:
            /s/ Michael
              Sheppard
### Part G—Restrictions and Penalties
|   | 1.        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,    and |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2.        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of      Registrant. |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                     |                                             |                     |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                     |                                             |                     |
| Dated:      June 2, 2009 |                                             | /s/      David M. Barnes |
|                     | David      M. BarnesChief      Executive Officer |
|                     |                                             |                     |

----