alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 891.500 Purpose and policy. ( a ) *Purpose.* The program under subpart E of this part provides direct Federal loans under section 202 of the Housing Act of 1959 (42 U.S.C. 1701q) for housing projects serving elderly or handicapped families and individuals. The housing projects shall provide the necessary services for the occupants which may include, but are not limited to: Health, continuing education, welfare, informational, recreational, homemaking, meal and nutritional services, counseling, and referral services, as well as transportation where necessary to facilitate access to these services.
( b ) *General policy.* A loan made under subpart E of this part shall be used to finance the construction or the substantial rehabilitation of projects for elderly or handicapped families, or for the acquisition with or without moderate rehabilitation of existing housing and related facilities for group homes for nonelderly handicapped individuals.
( c ) *Applicability.* Subpart E of this part applies to all fund reservations made before October 1, 1990, except for loans not initially closed that were converted to capital advances. Specifically, § 891.520 through 891.650 of subpart E apply to projects for elderly or handicapped families that received reservations under section 202 of the Housing Act of 1959 (12 U.S.C. 1701q) and housing assistance under section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437 *et seq*). Sections 891.655 through 891.790 of subpart E apply to projects for nonelderly handicapped families receiving reservations under section 202 and project assistance payments under section 202(h) of the Housing Act of 1959.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0001000

30-JUN-2015

08:40 AM
Exhibit 32.2
**CERTIFICATION**
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), Bruce D.Horn, Chief Financial Officer of Oplink Communications, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifiesthat, to the best of his knowledge:
**1.**The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004, to whichthis Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and
**2.**The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition at the end of the period covered by the Quarterly Report and results ofoperations of the Company for the periods covered by the Quarterly Report.
**In Witness Whereof,**the undersigned has set his hands hereto as of the 10th day of February, 2005.     /s/ Bruce D. Horn    Bruce D. Horn    Chief Financial Officer    
This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SECand is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Actof 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 11, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 133232 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, RAYMOND O’NEAL, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 133232 COA: 274573 Wayne CC: 05-515351-NH ST. JOHN HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER and DR. RALPH DILISIO, Defendants,

and

DR. EFSTATHIOS TAPAZOGLOU, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of March 7, 2007, this Co urt granted immediate consideration and ordered a stay of trial court proceedings. On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the February 8, 2007 order of the Co urt of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. We further ORDER that the stay entered by this Court on March 7, 2007, remains in effect until completion of this appeal. On motion of a party or on its own motion, the Court of Ap peals may modify, set aside, or place conditions on the stay if it appears that the appeal is not being vigorously prosecuted or if other appropriate grounds appear.

W EAVER , J., would deny leave to appeal as she is not persuaded of the need for immediate appellate review.

d0404 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 11, 2007

Clerk
Order entered September 18, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00985-CR

RANDY LOPEZ MILLS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1422077-S

ORDER

Before Justices Lang-Miers, Brown, and Schenck

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to issue the 

mandate in this appeal INSTANTER.

/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK 

JUSTICE
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 50918 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JAVIER LUJAN GARCIA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:15

- CR

- 496

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Javier Lujan Garcia pleaded guilty to one count of being found in the United States following deportation. The district court implicitly denied Lujan Garcia’s request for a downward variance and sentenced him within the advisory guidelines range to 41 mon ths in prison, to be followed by a three

year term of nonreporting supervised release. Lujan Garcia argues on appeal that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to argue at

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 15, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-50918 Document: 00513594216 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/15/2016No. 15

- 50918

2 sentencing the points that were raised in the defense senten cing memorandum, failing to request specific relief, and failing to object on the record at sentencing to preserve Lujan Garcia’s appellate arguments. In addition, Lujan Garcia complains that his trial counsel’s failure to specify how double counting his criminal history affected the sentence imposed constituted ineffective assistance and that combining the double counting argument with Lujan Garcia’s family situation made the request for a downward variance unclear. This court generally does not review c laims of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal. United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). We have “undertaken to resolve claims of inadequate representation on direct appeal only in rare cases where the record allowed us to evaluate fairly the merits of the claim.” United States v. Higdon , 832 F.2d 312, 314 (5th Cir. 1987). In most instances, we qualify a claim as a “rare case” warranting review only when it was raised and developed in a post

- trial motion to the district

co urt. United States v. Stevens , 487 F.3d 232, 245 (5th Cir. 2007). Lujan Garcia did not raise these ineffective assistance claims in the district court at any time. Because the record is not sufficiently developed to allow for a fair consideration of the se claims, we decline to consider them on direct appeal without prejudice to Lujan Garcia’s right to raise them on collateral review. See Isgar , 739 F.3d at 841. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 15-50918 Document: 00513594216 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/15/2016
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3409 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the withholding 

of income and social security taxes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2005 

Mr. HOSTETTLER (for himself, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mrs. CUBIN, Mr. 

CANNON, Mr. TANCREDO, Mr. PENCE, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. BARTLETT of 

Maryland, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia, and Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the withholding of income and social security taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Tax With5 holding Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF WITHHOLDING OF INCOME AND SOCIAL 

7 SECURITY TAXES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The following sections of the In9 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 are hereby repealed: 
2 

•HR 3409 IH 

1 (1) Section 3102 (relating to deduction of social 

2 security tax from wages). 

3 (2) Section 3202 (relating to deduction of rail4 road retirement tax from compensation). 

5 (3) Chapter 24 (relating to income tax with6 holding). 

7 (b) REQUIREMENT OF ESTIMATED TAX PAYMENTS

8 FOR EMPLOYEE SOCIAL SECURITY TAXES.—Subsection 

9 (f) of section 6654 of such Code is amended by striking 

10 ‘‘minus’’ at the end of paragraph (2) and inserting ‘‘plus’’, 

11 by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4), and by 

12 inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph: 

13 ‘‘(3) the taxes imposed by section 3101(a) and 

14 3201(a), minus’’. 

15 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 this section shall apply to amounts paid after the date of 

17 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### § 3288.300 Applicability.

This subpart establishes special regulatory procedures for issuing or revising dispute resolution program regulations as codified in this part.
#### Levi M. Stewart *vs.*Edward J. Davenport and others.

February 8, 1877.

Dismissal at Trial — -Exception.—Where no exception is taken to a decision dismissing an action on trial, for want of evidence, the correctness of such decision cannot be enquired into on a motion for a. new trial,, or on. appeal from an order denying a new trial.

*347Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the court of common pleas of Hennepin county, *Young, J.,*presiding, refusing' a new trial. The action was for malicious prosecution, and the substance of the complaint is stated in the report of the next following case.

*2). A. Secombe,*for appellant.

*Atwater & Babcock*and *Lochren, McNair &*Gilfillan, for respondents.

Cornell, J.

After plaintiff had introduced his testimony and rested his case, defendants moved for a dismissal of the action, on the ground that there was not sufficient evidence to go to the jury showing or tending to show a. cause of action against them. The motion was granted, and no exception was taken. A motion was subsequently made for a new trial, because of this alleged erroneous-ruling not excepted to, and denied, and the case comes into-this court on an appeal from this order. An erroneous ruling of this character, not excepted to at the time, cannot be made the subject of review on a motion for a new trial,, or on appeal from an order denying it.

Order affirmed.
### §908. Employee protection agreements

#### (a) Agreement between Milwaukee Railroad and labor organizations

The Milwaukee Railroad and labor organizations representing the employees of such railroad may, not later than 20 days after November 4, 1979, enter into an agreement providing protection for employees of such railroad who are adversely affected as a result of a reduction in service by such railroad or a restructuring transaction carried out by such railroad. Such employee protection may include, but need not be limited to, interim employee assistance, moving expenses, employee relocation incentive compensation, and separation allowances.

#### (b) Submission of matter to National Mediation Board

If the Milwaukee Railroad and the labor organizations representing the employees of such railroad are unable to enter into an employee protection agreement under subsection (a) of this section within 20 days after November 4, 1979, the parties shall immediately submit the matter to the National Mediation Board. The National Mediation Board shall attempt, by mediation, to bring the parties to an agreement with respect to employee protection no later than 40 days after November 4, 1979.

#### (c) Fair and equitable agreements

(1) If the National Mediation Board is unable to bring the parties to an agreement under subsection (b) of this section within 40 days after November 4, 1979, the Milwaukee Railroad and the labor organizations representing the employees of such railroad shall immediately enter into an employee protection agreement that is fair and equitable.

(2) If an employee protection agreement is entered into under this subsection, any claim of an employee for benefits and allowances under such agreement shall be filed with the Board in such time and manner as the Board by regulation shall prescribe. The Board shall determine the amount for which such employee is eligible under such agreement and shall certify such amount to the Milwaukee Railroad for payment.

#### (d) Payment of benefits and allowances

Benefits and allowances under an employee protection agreement entered into under this section shall be paid by the Milwaukee Railroad in accordance with section 914 of this title, and claims of employees for such benefits and allowances shall be treated as administrative expenses of the estate of the Milwaukee Railroad.

(Pub. L. 96–101, §9, Nov. 4, 1979, 93 Stat. 741.)
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPreliminary design and cost of a 1-megawatt solar-pumped iodide laser space-to-space transmission stationA preliminary conceptual design of a space-based solar pumped iodide laser emitting 1 megawatt of laser power for space-to-space power transmission is described. A near parabolic solar collector focuses sunlight onto the t-C4F9I (perfluoro-t butyl iodide) lasant within a transverse flow optical cavity. Using waste heat, a thermal system was designed to supply compressor and auxiliary power. System components were designed with weight and cost estimates assigned. Although cost is very approximate, the cost comparison of individual system components leads to valuable insights for future research. In particular, it was found that laser efficiency was not a dominant cost or weight factor, the dominant factor being the laser cavity and laser transmission optics. The manufacturing cost was approx. two thirds of the total cost with transportation to orbit the remainder. The flowing nonrenewable lasant comprised 20% of the total life cycle cost of the system and thus was not a major cost factor. The station mass was 92,000 kg without lasant, requiring approx. four shuttle flights to low Earth orbit where an orbital transfer vehicle will transport it to the final altitude of 6378 km.Document ID19870017752Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsDeyoung, R. J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Walker, G. H.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Williams, M. D.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Schuster, G. L.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Conway, E. J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1987Subject CategoryLasers And MasersReport/Patent NumberL-16308NAS 1.15:4002NASA-TM-4002Accession Number87N27185Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-41-41-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19870017752.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 31       Rule 13a-14(d) Certification



                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas G.  Lehmann,  a First Vice  President of  Washington  Mutual  Mortgage
Securities Corp., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of WaMu Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-AR7;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer under
the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon my knowledge and
the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as
disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that
agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided
by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated third parties acting as servicers
and sub-servicers:




None


Dated: March 29, 2005

                                     /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann
                                     ----------------------------------------
                                     Thomas G. Lehmann
                                     First Vice President
### §70104. Transportation security incident response

(a) Facility and Vessel Response Plans.—The Secretary shall—

(1) establish security incident response plans for vessels and facilities that may be involved in a transportation security incident; and

(2) make those plans available to the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency for inclusion in the Administrator's response plan for United States ports and waterways.

(b) Contents.—Response plans developed under subsection (a) shall provide a comprehensive response to an emergency, including notifying and coordinating with local, State, and Federal authorities, including the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, securing the facility or vessel, and evacuating facility and vessel personnel.

(c) Inclusion in Security Plan.—A response plan required under this subsection for a vessel or facility may be included in the security plan prepared under section 70103(c).

(Added Pub. L. 107–295, title I, §102(a), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2072; amended Pub. L. 109–295, title VI, §612(c), Oct. 4, 2006, 120 Stat. 1410.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency" and "Administrator's" substituted for "Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency" and "Director's", respectively, on authority of section 612(c) of Pub. L. 109–295, set out as a note under section 313 of Title 6, Domestic Security. Any reference to the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency in title VI of Pub. L. 109–295 or an amendment by title VI to be considered to refer and apply to the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency until Mar. 31, 2007, see section 612(f)(2) of Pub. L. 109–295, set out as a note under section 313 of Title 6.

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of all functions, personnel, assets, components, authorities, grant programs, and liabilities of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, including the functions of the Under Secretary for Federal Emergency Management relating thereto, to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, see section 315(a)(1) of Title 6, Domestic Security.

For transfer of functions, personnel, assets, and liabilities of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, including the functions of the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency relating thereto, to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see former section 313(1) and sections 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.

#### Deadline

Pub. L. 107–295, title I, §102(c), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2084, provided that: "The Secretary shall establish the plans required under section 70104(a)(1) of title 46, United States Code, as enacted by this Act, before April 1, 2003."
### §1162. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1162 was editorially reclassified as section 2502 of this title.
§ 6.10 Compliance information. ( a ) *Cooperation and assistance.* The Responsible Official and the Award Official will provide assistance and guidance to Recipients to help them comply voluntarily with this part.
( b ) *Access to data and other sources of information.* Each Recipient shall permit access by authorized representatives of HUD to its facilities, books, records, accounts, minutes and audio tapes of meetings, personnel, computer disks and tapes, and other sources of information as may be pertinent to a determination of whether the Recipient is complying with this part. Where information required of a Recipient is in the exclusive possession of any other agency, institution, or person, and that agency, institution, or person fails or refuses to furnish this information, the Recipient shall so certify in any requested report and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information. Failure or refusal to furnish pertinent information (whether maintained by the Recipient or some other agency, institution, or person) without a credible reason for the failure or refusal will be considered to be noncompliance under this part.
( c ) *Compliance data.* Each Recipient shall keep records and submit to the Responsible Official, timely, complete, and accurate data at such times and in such form as the Responsible Official may determine to be necessary to ascertain whether the Recipient has complied or is complying with this part.
( d ) *Notification to employees, beneficiaries, and participants.* Each Recipient shall make available to employees, participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons information regarding the provisions of this part and its applicability to the program or activity under which the Recipient receives Federal financial assistance and make such information available to them in such manner as the Responsible Official finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by Section 109 and this part.