alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 11

               Statement Re:  Computation of Earnings Per Share
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              Three Months    Three Months
                                                 Ended            Ended
                                                March 30,       March 29,
                                                  1997            1996
                                              ------------    ------------
<S>                                           <C>             <C>
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
 
Primary
 
Average shares outstanding                         4,755           1,770
 
Adjustment to reflect shares issued
 to consider excess S Corporation distributions        -              (6)
 
Shares issuable upon the exercise of
 outstanding stock options and warrants              127               -
                                              ------------    ------------
 
Total                                              4,882           1,764
                                              ============    ============
 
Net income                                        $  728          $  173
                                              ============    ============
 
Per common share amount                           $ 0.15          $ 0.10
                                              ============    ============
</TABLE>
Fully diluted earnings per Common Share and primary earnings per Common Share
are the same for the three months ended March 30, 1997.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Hayes, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[832 NYS2d 852]

Ap*1176peal from a judgment of the Oneida County Court (Patrick L. Kirk, J.), rendered December 16, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the second degree and attempted arson in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Same memorandum as in *People v Hayes*(39 AD3d 1173 [2007]). Present—Gorski, J.P., Martoche, Smith, Lunn and Pine, JJ.
EXHIBIT 31

CERTIFICATION TO BE
PROVIDED WITH FORM 10-K

Re:	Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. Trust 2004-HE4 (the "Trust"), Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-HE4, issued pursuant to the Pooling
and Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2004 (the "Pooling and
Servicing Agreement"), among Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc., as
depositor (the "Depositor"), Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation, as a
servicer, ("Chase"), Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as a servicer
("Countrywide"), HomEq Servicing Corporation, as a servicer ("HomEq" and,
together with Chase and Countrywide, the "Servicers"), Aames Capital
Corporation, as a responsible party, Accredited Home Lenders, Inc., as a
responsible party, NC Capital Corporation, as a responsible party and
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee (the "Trustee")

 I, [identify the certifying individual], certify that:

            (1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K (the
"Annual Report"), and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution
reports (collectively with this Annual Report, the "Reports") filed in
respect of periods included in the year covered by this Annual Report,
of the Trust;

            (2) Based on my knowledge, the information in the Reports,
taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
 in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this Annual Report;

            (3) Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing
information required to be provided to the Trustee by each Servicer under the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement, for inclusion in the Reports is included in
the Reports;

            (4) Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance
statement included in this Annual Report and required to be delivered to the
Trustee in accordance with the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,
 and except as disclosed in the Reports, each Servicer has fulfilled its
obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

            (5) The Reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to
the applicable Servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based
upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting
a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement, that is included in the Reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  the Trustee and the
Servicers.

Date:	________________________________

[Signature]
[Title]
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 37

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

08/07

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL
### **CHAPTER 405—TARIFFS, SERVICE CONTRACTS, REFUNDS, AND WAIVERS**

Sec.
40501.
General rate and tariff requirements.
40502.
Service contracts.
40503.
Refunds and waivers.
40504.
Shipping exchange registry.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2022**—Pub. L. 117–146, §4(c), June 16, 2022, 136 Stat. 1273, added item 40504.
§ 891.640 Adjustment of rents. ( a ) *Contract rents* — ( 1 ) *Adjustment based on approved budget.* If the HAP contract provides, or has been amended to provide, that contract rents will be adjusted based upon a HUD-approved budget, HUD will calculate contract rent adjustments based on the sum of the project's operating costs and debt service (as calculated by HUD), with adjustments for vacancies, the project's nonrental income, and other factors that HUD deems appropriate. The calculation will be made on the basis of information provided by the Borrower on a form acceptable to the Secretary. The automatic adjustment factor described in part 888 of this chapter is not used to adjust contract rents under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, except to the extent that the amount of the replacement reserve deposit is adjusted under § 880.602 of this chapter.
( 2 ) *Annual and special adjustments.* If the HAP contract provides that contract rents will be adjusted based on the application of an automatic adjustment factor and by special additional adjustments: ( i ) Consistent with the HAP contract, contract rents may be adjusted in accordance with part 888 of this chapter;
( ii ) Special additional adjustments will be granted, to the extent determined necessary by HUD, to reflect increases in the actual and necessary expenses of owning and maintaining the assisted units that have resulted from substantial general increases in real property taxes, assessments, utility rates or similar costs (i.e., assessments and utilities not covered by regulated rates), and that are not adequately compensated for by an annual adjustment. The Borrower must submit to HUD required supporting data, financial statements, and certifications for the special additional adjustment.
( b ) *Rent for unassisted units.* The rent payable by families occupying units that are not assisted under the HAP contract shall be equal to the contract rent computed under paragraph (a) of this section.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2502-0371)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMBINED
AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TRENDWEST RESORTS, INC. AND CERTAIN
AFFILIATES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,662                   2,662
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   80,113                  80,113
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,240                   9,240
<INVENTORY>                                     23,620                  23,620
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                           8,423                   8,423
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,779                   1,779
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 136,280                 136,280
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        66,882                  66,882
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,987                  49,987
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   136,280                 136,280
<SALES>                                         35,575                  96,395
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,472                 112,922
<CGS>                                            9,219                  25,444
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,521                  26,274
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,494                   6,654
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 294                   1,739
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,509                  89,127
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,076                   8,582
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,433                  15,213
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,433                  15,213
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00515

- CV

SPECIALTY SELECT CARE CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO d/b/a Casa Rio Healthcare and Rehabilitation, Appellant

v.

Adolfo R. JUIEL , Individually, Anna M. Juiel, Individually and on Behalf of Isaac Juiel, Individually, and as All Heirs of the Estate of Bertha Juiel, Deceased, and Lisa Ochoa, as Representative of the Estate of Nora Nieto, Deceased, Appellees

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 04911 Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order is REVERSED, judgment is RENDERED granting appellant Special ty Select Care Center of San Antonio, LLC d/b/a Casa Rio Healthcare and Rehabilitation’s motion to compel arbitration, and the matter is REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this court’s opinion.

We order that appellant Specialty Select Care Center of San Antonio, LLC d/b/a Casa Rio Healthcare and Rehabilitation recover its costs of this appeal from appellees Adolfo R. Juiel, Individually, Anna M. Juiel, Individually and on Behalf of Isaac Juiel, Individually, and as All Heirs of the Estate of Bertha Juiel, Deceased, and Lisa Ochoa, as Representative of the Estate of Nora Nieto, Deceased

SIGNED July 20, 2016

_____________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice
#### Peter Thompson *vs.*C. Z. Sutton and others.

June 14, 1876.

Sale of Judgment on Execution. — If, under Gen. St. *c.*66, $ 269, a judgment can bo levied upon and sold, upon execution, the sale can only be made “if the court so order,” as provided in section 284 of the same chapter.

Plaintiff obtained judgment against defendants in the court of common pleas of Ramsey county, and caused execution thereon to bo issued to Nobles county, by virtue of Avhich execution the sheriff of that county levied upon a judgment which had theretofore been recovered by the defendants Miller, Ilumiston & Co., against the defendants C. Z. Sutton and James Lundy, in the district court for Nobles county, and ivas docketed, therein. The judgment thus levied on, the sheriff proceeded to sell, without having obtained any order of sale from the court. The plaintiff having purchased the judgment at the execution sale, the defendants heroin moved the court of common picas for an order setting aside the sale. The motion was granted by *Hall,*J., and the plaintiff appealed.

*Stanford Newel*and *Daniel Bucle,*for appellant.

*JEmory Ciarle,*for respondents.

Berry, J.1

If, for the purposes of this case, it be admitted that, under the provisions of Gen. St. *c. 66,*§ 269, a judgment can be levied upon by execution, still, as it is a thing in action, *(Fore*v. *Manlove,*18 Cal. 437; *Burtis*v. *Cook,*16 Iowa, 194,) the sale can be made only “if the court so orders.” Gen. St. c. 66, § 284.

Order affirmed.

1

 Gilfillan, C. J., having been of counsel, did not sit in this case.
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
| Date:  | February 25, 2015 | By: |   | /s/ Martin S. Craighead |
|   |   |   |   | Martin S. CraigheadChairman andChief Executive Officer |
ALASKA PENINSULA |

BATHYMETRIC MAP MITROFANIA ISLAND |

6g0000m.E,

aw y y y wipe | he

‘a San, \)\)
q

620000m.1y

Islands

LZ

YU

fA /Z

~

(G4

IS

TON
WI

y

a
cy
@
Ea

Zs
OF

Mi,
Wa
ys

NW
)

\\
\\
;
\
\
\\

ma
=
SY

}
\
\
i

\

\ \
NN
\
\\

61] 0000m.N

oo

\

|
———

<r

EE
— =
\

\\
i

(7
‘w,

|
\
\

,
)\\
fi
\

©
‘oO
©
w

a"
Yo
oN

2

)

Nor

\
NS
7
Z|

\

6g0000m-£,

g-

510000m.6,

HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY INFORMATION OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MAP HORNA HIS SOREN NOK MITROFANIA ISLAND

Base map information including bathymetry was compiled by the National Ocean Service
(NOS). Bathymetry was compiled from NOS hydrographic surveys supplemented by hydro- : 159° 156°
graphic information from other sources (see index). NOS hydrographic survey data complies : . UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 56°
with International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) Publication 44 accuracy standards or - survey survey suey -| une sracina . : NOS NN 4-2 (OCS)
those used at the date of the surveys. This is a reproduction of a facsimile of the bathymetric NUMBER oar SCALE (NAT MILES) ; NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
manuscript and does not necessarily represent the final publication. This information is not wge00 19s + 120.000 so-18 NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE
intended for navigationai purposes . 7924 i951 1:20,000 02.38, .
: . 7907 1951 140.000 - 40-90 :
Bathymetric Contour ‘Intervals: 10 meters to 200 meter depth, supplemented by 5 meter 4.7928 1951 1:40,000 10-10 1989
intervals, thence 50 meters to maximum depth, supplemented by 10 meter intervals. .
D Mean L Low Water (MLLW} Produced at Washington, D.C.
atum: Mean Lower Low Water ). for INDEX TO ADJOINING SHEETS 153
162° . 53° . ‘
sunsemetan Date sn sm |

Universal Transverse Mercator Grid. Zone 4; 10,000 meter ticks (---) are shown inside the
[ee

neatline. : , : T ve |
Protraction Diagram data shown in a subdued (screened) black was compiled by the Minerals : . UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR . _ : : uso arms syne | NEO |
¢ oe . |

Management Service (MMS). MINER
AALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE
THIS MAP IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT for Federal leasing purposes; for such purposes . : : : : : : . |
_ use the MMS Outer Continental Shelf Official Protraction Diagrams. : - . . . : sree’ irRorANA a use Islano . |.
Heavy line(s) indicate limits of these protraction diagrams. : finn ee NN Sot |
; : TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION ; . 6° . . . ee ose : . aed 4, ee
° Photographic i of the abc \d prior may be obtained, the ot sduction, by a re °
Scale 1:250,000 159" Addressing the. Director (N/CG243), National Ocean Service, Notional Oceanic and Atmosprene 15 stuconor
5 ° ~ 40 15 20 Statute Miles ‘Administration, Rockville, Maryland 20852 : | ens SHUMAGIN| BANK
: =)
5 ° 5 10 15 20 25 30 Kilometers sae L ee ee | 54°
SoS : eo iss
5 ° 5 10 15 Nautical Miles . : F .
— — aj pace ennaatterttininien ann
First Department,

January, 1961

(January 3, 1961)

#### Reinaldo Bustamante, Jr., by His Guardian ad Litem, Evelyn Bustamante, et al. v. New York Telephone Company et al.

Motion for leave to appeal as poor persons granted to the extent and on the terms and conditions contained in the order of this court. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.
```

[House Document 106-306]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                     

106th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - - - - - - Document 106-306

 
                       VETO MESSAGE ON H.R. 4516

                               __________

                                MESSAGE

                                  from

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

HIS VETO OF H.R. 4516, A BILL MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE LEGISLATIVE 
  BRANCH FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 20, 2001, AND FOR OTHER 
                               PURPOSES.

  November 1, 2000.--Message and accompanying papers referred to the 
         Committee on Appropriations and ordered to be printed
To the House of Representatives:
    I am returning herewith without my approval, H.R. 4516, the 
Legislative Branch and the Treasury and General Government 
Appropriations Act, 2001. This bill provides funds for the 
legislative branch and the White House at a time when the 
business of the American people remains unfinished.
    The Congress' continued refusal to focus on the priorities 
of the American people leaves me no alternative but to veto 
this bill. I cannot in good conscience sign a bill that funds 
the operations of the Congress and the White House before 
funding our classrooms, fixing our schools, and protecting our 
workers.
    With the largest student enrollment in history, we need a 
budget that will allow us to repair and modernize crumbling 
schools, reduce class size, hire more and better trained 
teachers, expand after-school programs, and strengthen 
accountability to turn around failing schools.
    I would sign this legislation in the context of a budget 
that puts the interests of the American people before self 
interest or special interests. I urge the Congress to get its 
priorities in order and send me, without further delay, 
balanced legislation I can sign.

                                                William J. Clinton.
    The White House, October 30, 2000.
    
    

```
```

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 234 (Friday, December 4, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78332-78333]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26851]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: December 9, 2020; 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: This meeting will be held by video-conference only.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    1. Briefing by Commissioner Dye on Fact Finding No. 29.
    2. Staff Update on General Prohibitions in the Shipping Act.

[[Page 78333]]

    3. Briefing by Inspector General Jon Hatfield.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Rachel Dickon, Secretary, (202) 
523-5725.

Rachel Dickon,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-26851 Filed 12-2-20; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
```
§ 905.1 Grievances other than disciplinary actions. ( a ) In all grievances other than those concerning disciplinary actions, the grievant has the burden of establishing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the grievance is meritorious.
( b ) Where a grievant establishes that an evaluation contained falsely prejudicial material which may have been a substantial factor in an agency action, and the question is presented whether the agency would have taken the same action had the evaluation not contained that material, the burden will shift to the agency to establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that it would have done so.
( c ) Where a grievant establishes that a procedural error occurred which is of such a nature that it may have been a substantial factor in an agency action with respect to the grievant, and the question is presented whether the agency would have taken the same action had the procedural error not occurred, the burden will shift to the agency to establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that it would have done so.
[50 FR 31356, Aug. 2, 1985]
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





I, Robert V. Longe, President and Chief Executive Officer of Kimber Resources Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Kimber Resources Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.



Date: September 25, 2006



R. V. Longe



______________________­­________

Robert V. Longe, President and Chief Executive Officer