alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document

        

Exhibit 10.7
Personal and Confidential
August 13, 2022
c/o Endo International plc
First Floor, Minerva House, Simmonscourt Road
Ballsbridge, Dublin, Ireland
Re:    Employment Agreement Extension
Dear Patrick:
In connection with the accelerated payment of your 2023 incentive compensation, Endo International plc (“Endo” or the “Company”) wishes to amend your employment agreement with the Company, dated as of April 26, 2020 (the “Employment Agreement”), as set forth in this letter agreement (this “Amendment”). Effective as of the date hereof, the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
1.Section 1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the reference to “the third anniversary thereof” with “March 31, 2024”.
Except as otherwise modified herein, all of the terms of your Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Sections 14 and 15 of the Employment Agreement are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
***************






        

Please direct any questions to Tracy Basso, Chief Human Resources Officer.
						
	Very truly yours,
		
	ENDO INTERNATIONAL PLC
		
	By:	/S/ Blaise Coleman
		Blaise Coleman
		President and CEO


    


The above terms and conditions accurately reflect our understanding regarding the Amendment, and I hereby confirm my agreement to the same.
						
	/S/ Patrick Barry
	Name:	Patrick Barry
		
	8/13/2022
	Date:
Exhibit 15.1
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-152150 on Form F-3, No. 333-160412 on Form F-3 and No. 333-161022 on Form F-3 of our report dated April 12, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Top Ships Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company"), (which report expresses an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010.
 
 We also consent to the reference to us under the headings "Selected Financial Data" in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.
 
 
 
 
 /s/ Deloitte Hadjipavlou, Sofianos & Cambanis S.A.
 
 Athens, Greece
 April 12, 2011
### SUBCHAPTER II—ENDORSEMENTS AND SPECIAL DOCUMENTATION
§ 3.300 Admission. ( a ) *General.* No person shall, on the basis of sex, be denied admission, or be subjected to discrimination in admission, by any recipient to which §§ 3.300 through 3.310 apply, except as provided in §§ 3.225 and 3.230.
( b ) *Specific prohibitions.* ( 1 ) In determining whether a person satisfies any policy or criterion for admission, or in making any offer of admission, a recipient to which §§ 3.300 through 3.310 apply shall not: ( i ) Give preference to one person over another on the basis of sex, by ranking applicants separately on such basis, or otherwise;
( ii ) Apply numerical limitations upon the number or proportion of persons of either sex who may be admitted; or
( iii ) Otherwise treat one individual differently from another on the basis of sex.
( 2 ) A recipient shall not administer or operate any test or other criterion for admission that has a disproportionately adverse effect on persons on the basis of sex unless the use of such test or criterion is shown to predict validly success in the education program or activity in question and alternative tests or criteria that do not have such a disproportionately adverse effect are shown to be unavailable.
( c ) *Prohibitions relating to marital or parental status.* In determining whether a person satisfies any policy or criterion for admission, or in making any offer of admission, a recipient to which §§ 3.300 through 3.310 apply: ( 1 ) Shall not apply any rule concerning the actual or potential parental, family, or marital status of a student or applicant that treats persons differently on the basis of sex;
( 2 ) Shall not discriminate against or exclude any person on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, termination of pregnancy, or recovery therefrom, or establish or follow any rule or practice that so discriminates or excludes;
( 3 ) Subject to § 3.235(d), shall treat disabilities related to pregnancy, childbirth, termination of pregnancy, or recovery therefrom in the same manner and under the same policies as any other temporary disability or physical condition; and
( 4 ) Shall not make pre-admission inquiry as to the marital status of an applicant for admission, including whether such applicant is “Miss” or “Mrs.” A recipient may make pre-admission inquiry as to the sex of an applicant for admission, but only if such inquiry is made equally of such applicants of both sexes and if the results of such inquiry are not used in connection with discrimination prohibited by these Title IX regulations.
**Exhibit
      32.2**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Ignis Petroleum Group, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Timothy Hart,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Timothy Hart


Timothy
      Hart


Chief
      Financial Officer





Date:
      October 13, 2006
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Elizabeth Thomas, James Allen, Roberto Perez, and Maria De 

Jesus Perez

Appellate case number: 01-18-00580-CV

Trial court case number: 2017-76078

Trial court: 127th District Court of Harris County

Relators’ motion for an emergency stay of trial court proceedings pending determination 

of their mandamus petition is DENIED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

Acting individually 

Date: July 6, 2018
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 6D2 3

- 1548 Lower Tribunal No. 202 1

- C F

- 004779

- A

- O

_____________________________ K YLE J OSEPH ,

Appellant ,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County

. Tarlika Nunez

- Navar ro, Judge. December 19, 2023
PER CURIAM

. AFFIRMED

. TRAVER , C

. J. , and WOZNIAK and BROWNLEE , JJ., c oncur.

Asad Ali and Robert I. Mandell, of Mandell Law, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Stephen R. Putnam , Jr. , Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach , for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION F OR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Exhibit
10.22


 


AMENDMENT
#2 - EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


THIS
AMENDMENT #2 TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Agreement”), dated November 22, 2021, and effective
as of July 19, 2021 (the “Effective Date”) is between Progressive Care Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and its wholly
owned subsidiaries (the “Employer” or the “Company”), and Alan Jay Weisberg, an individual (“Employee”).


 


R
E C I T A L S:


 


	A.	Company
                                            and Employee entered into that certain Employment Agreement, effective as of October 15,
                                            2020 (the “Original Agreement”).’



 


	B.	Employee
                                            is knowledgeable with respect to the business of the Company.



 


	C.	Company
                                            desires to continue employment to Employee and Employee desires to continue employment by
                                            Company.



 


	D.	On
                                            November 22, 2021, the Company and the Employee agreed to enter into an Amended and Restated
                                            Employment Agreement.



 


	E.	The
                                            Company and Employee wish to amend certain compensation provisions of the Amended and Restated
                                            Employment Agreement.



 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the parties agree as follows:


 


	1.	Section 4, Compensation, is revised and amended as follows:




 


Paragraphs
(d) and (e) are deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following:


 


	 	(d)	Employee
                                            shall be granted fifteen million (15,000,000) restricted stock units (the “RSU’s”)
                                            under and subject to all of the provisions of the related Restricted Stock Unit Agreement
                                            (the “Founders Award Agreement”). The restricted shares shall be vested immediately.



 


[the
remainder of the page has intentionally been left blank. signature page follows]


 






    	1



     


    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.


 


	PROGRESSIVE CARE INC.	 	 
	 	 	 
	By:	          	 	Dated: October 7, 2022
	 	Charles M. Fernandez	 	 
	 	Chairman of the Board of Directors	 	 
	 	 	 
	EMPLOYEE	 	 
	 	 	 
	  	 	Dated: October 7, 2022
	Alan Jay Weisberg, an individual	 	 




 






    	2
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                   FORM 10-Q/A


[X]     QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
        SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                  FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999

                                       OR

[ ]     TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
        SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


                           Commission File No. 0-21391



                           TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)


        DELAWARE                                              95-4699061
(State or other Jurisdiction of                            (I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization)                            Identification No.)


 21700 Oxnard Street, Suite 1550, Woodland Hills, California          91367
       (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)


                                 (818) 593-2282
              (Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)



Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

                              Yes    X          No _____

Shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001, outstanding as of August 17, 1999:
46,363,210 shares.

<PAGE>


ITEM 6.        EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

         EXHIBITS
         --------
           11.1   Statement re computation of per share earnings
           27.1   Financial Data Schedule

<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized.


                                           TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES INC.




Date:  August 17, 1999                     By  /S/KHAL A. KADER
                                               ----------------------------
                                               Khal A. Kader
                                               Chief Financial Officer
                                               (Principal Accounting Officer)
§ 3.205 Educational institutions and other entities controlled by religious organizations. ( a ) *Exemption.* These Title IX regulations do not apply to any operation of an educational institution or other entity that is controlled by a religious organization to the extent that application of these Title IX regulations would not be consistent with the religious tenets of such organization.
( b ) *Exemption claims.* An educational institution or other entity that wishes to claim the exemption set forth in paragraph (a) of this section shall do so by submitting in writing to the designated agency official a statement by the highest-ranking official of the institution, identifying the provisions of these Title IX regulations that conflict with a specific tenet of the religious organization.
### §3719. Reduction of oil spills from single hull non-self-propelled tank vessels

The Secretary shall, in consultation with the National Towing Safety Advisory Committee and taking into consideration the characteristics, methods of operation, and the size and nature of service of single hull non-self-propelled tank vessels and towing vessels, prescribe regulations requiring a single hull non-self-propelled tank vessel that operates in the open ocean or coastal waters, or the vessel towing it, to have at least one of the following:

(1) A crew member and an operable anchor on board the tank vessel that together are capable of arresting the tank vessel without additional assistance under reasonably foreseeable sea conditions.

(2) An emergency system on the tank vessel or towing vessel that without additional assistance under reasonably foreseeable sea conditions will allow the tank vessel to be retrieved by the towing vessel if the tow line ruptures.

(3) Any other measure or combination of measures that the Secretary determines will provide protection against grounding of the tank vessel comparable to that provided by the measures described in paragraph (1) or (2).

(Added Pub. L. 104–324, title IX, §901(a), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3946; amended Pub. L. 115–282, title VI, §601(c)(6)(B)(i), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4290.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 inserted "National" before "Towing Safety" in introductory provisions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Regulations

Pub. L. 104–324, title IX, §901(b), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3946, provided that: "The Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall issue regulations required under section 3719 of title 46, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), by not later than October 1, 1997."
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and coll ateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### JAN 27 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

BIG HORN COAL COMPANY,

Petitioner,

v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent, DAVID N. STEELE, Intervenor. No. 95-9549 (OWCP No. 520-22-7750)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

BeforeBRORBY , BARRETT, and MURPHY , Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Big Horn Coal Company (“Big Horn Coal”) seeks review of a final order of the United States Department of Labo r Benefits Review Board (“Benefits Review Board”) directing Big Horn Coal t o make black lung-2-

compensation payments to Mr. David Steele, the clai mant. The Benefits Review Board affirmed an order of a United States Departme nt of Labor Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) finding that Mr. Steel had pneumo coniosis under 20 C.F.R. § 718.202(a)(4), that Mr. Steele was totally disabled , and that he was entitled to disability benefits because his pneumoconiosis was a “contributing cause” of his total disability under 20 C.F.R. § 718.204(a), 718. 204(b) and 718.204(c)(5). Both the ALJ and the Benefits Review Board applied this court’s decision in Mangus v. Director, OWCP , 882 F.2d 1527 (10th Cir. 1989) in concluding thatMr. Steele was entitled to disability benefits. In Mangus , this court set forth the standard to be used in interpreting 20 C.F.R. § 718.204(a): “i f the pneumoconiosis is at least a contributing cause , there is a sufficient nexus between the pneumocon iosis and the total disability to satisfy claimant’s burden o f proof.” Id. at 1531-32. Big Horn Coal contends that the Mangus“at least a contributing cause” standard should not be applied in this case. Inste ad, it asks this panel to impose a “preponderance of the substantial evidence” standar d. This we cannot do. One panel of this court cannot overrule the decision of another panel. United States v. Zapata , 997 F.2d 751, 759 n.6 (10th Cir. 1993); United States v. Spedalieri , 910 F.2d 707, 710 n.3 (10th Cir. 1990). Mangusprovides controlling precedent for this case and we are bound to apply it. After revi ewing the record on appeal, this court concludes that the Benefits Review Board prop erly found the ALJ’s1 Big Horn Coal filed its motion after oral argument and while the case was

under advisement. The panel is unaware of any rule , practice, or logic authorizing such an unorthodox motion. -3- decision to be supported by substantial evidence. Wyoming Fuel Co. v. Director, OWCP, 90 F.3d 1502, 1505 (10th Cir. 1996). The fin al order of the Benefits Review Board is hereby AFFIRMED . Big Horn Coal’s motion to allow a late filing of an initial en bancsuggestion is DENIED

. 1 ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Michael R. Murphy Circuit Judge
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CABN 44332)

United States Attorney

JOANN M. SWANSON (CSBN 88143)

Chief, Civil Division

MELISSA K. BROWN (CSBN 203307)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102-3495

Telephone: (415) 436-6962

FAX: (415) 436-6748

melissa.k.brown@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

LUDWIK CHROBOK,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

VETERANS ADMINISTRATION

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-09-2890 TEH

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Case 3:09-cv-02890-TEH Document 10 Filed 01/05/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

G Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

G Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

X Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

G the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 

X other requested deadline: 120 days from the date of the order referring the case to

an ADR process..

DATED: January 4, 2010 Respectfully submitted,

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO

United States Attorney

/s/ Melissa Brown

________________________________

MELISSA K. BROWN

Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: January 4, 2010

MARK J. ALEXANDER

Law Offices of Mark J. Alexander

/s/ Mark J. Alexander

________________________________

MARK J. ALEXANDER

Attorney for the Plaintiff

Case 3:09-cv-02890-TEH Document 10 Filed 01/05/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED ] ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the parties are order to participate in court

ordered mediation process within one hundred and twenty (120) days from the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated: _______________ ____________________________

HON. THELTON E. HENDERSON

United States District Court Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Thelton E. Henderson

01/05/10

Case 3:09-cv-02890-TEH Document 10 Filed 01/05/10 Page 3 of 3
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

 

(1)                   Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-171712) of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.,

 

(2)                   Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-170365) pertaining to the securities to be offered to employees under the 2004 Long Term Incentive Plan of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.,

 

(3)                   Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-155098) pertaining to the securities to be offered to employees under the 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc., and

 

(4)                   Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-122088) pertaining to the securities to be offered to employees under the 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.

 

of our reports dated February 17, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 
|   | /s/   Ernst & Young LLP |
|--------|----------------------------------|

 

Irvine, California

February 17, 2011

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 29, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 31587]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13059]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:  Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Friday June 29, 2012.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the 
event that the times or dates of these or any future meetings change, 
an announcement of the change, along with the new time and place of the 
meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-13059 Filed 5-24-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
#### DAVIES et al., Respondents, v. VAN DER LAAN et al.. Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 9, 1903.)

Action by Davies, Turner & Co. against Albert Van Der Laan and another. W. Bhlippeau, for appellants. G. E. Hargrave, for respondents.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.