alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **CHAPTER 30—ADMINISTRATION OF PUBLIC LANDS**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec.
1361 to 1364. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—SERVICE CHARGES AND EXCESS PAYMENTS

1371 to 1374. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—DEPOSITS AND FORFEITURES

1381 to 1383. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—PUBLIC LAND LAW REVIEW COMMISSION

1391 to 1400. Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—CLASSIFICATION OF LANDS TO PROVIDE FOR DISPOSAL OR INTERIM MANAGEMENT

1411 to 1418. Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER VI—SALE OF PUBLIC LAND

1421 to 1427. Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER VII—SALE OF PUBLIC LANDS SUBJECT TO UNINTENTIONAL TRESPASS

1431 to 1435. Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER VIII—PUBLIC AIRPORTS

1441.
Lease of contiguous public lands for public airports; authority of Secretary of the Interior.
1442.
Terms of lease; public lands for public airports.
1443.
Cancellation of leases of public lands used as airports made under law in force May 24, 1928.
PUBLIC LAW 110–158—DEC. 26, 2007 121 STAT. 1837 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1045: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 110–46 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007): 

Mar. 13, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 19, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–158 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the Federal building located at 210 Walnut Street in Des Moines, 

Iowa, as the ‘‘Neal Smith Federal Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The Federal building located at 210 Walnut Street in Des 

Moines, Iowa, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Neal Smith 

Federal Building’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the Federal building referred 

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Neal 

Smith Federal Building’’. 

Approved December 26, 2007. 

Dec. 26, 2007 

[H.R. 1045] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29 with PUBLIC LAWS
Editorial Note on Part 64
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 64 appear at 64 FR 54540, Oct. 7, 1999.

§ 64.2 Definitions. For the purpose of this part: ( a ) *Federal employee* means: ( 1 ) An employee as defined by section 2105 of title 5, United States Code;
( 2 ) an individual employed by, or occupying an office or position in, the government of a territory or possession of the United States or the District of Columbia;
( 3 ) a member of a uniformed service;
( 4 ) the President and Vice President; and
( 5 ) a Member of the Senate or the House of Representatives, a Delegate from the District of Columbia in Congress, and the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico in Congress.
( b ) A *foreign government* means a foreign government and an official agent or representative thereof; a group of governments and an official agent or representative thereof; an international organization composed of governments, and an official agent or representative thereof.
( c ) A program of the *type described in section 102(a)(2)(i) of the Act* means a cultural exchange program involving “visits and interchanges between the United States and other countries of leaders, experts in fields of specialized knowledge or skill, and other influential or distinguished persons.”
( d ) The “purpose stated in section 101 of the Act” is “to enable the Government of the United States to increase mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the people of the other countries by means of educational and cultural exchange; to strengthen the ties which unite us with other nations by demonstrating the educational and cultural interests, developments, and achievements of the people of the United States and other nations, and the contributions being made toward a peaceful and more fruitful life for people throughout the world; to promote international cooperation for educational and cultural advancement; and thus to assist in the development of friendly, sympathetic, and peaceful relations between the United States and the other countries of the world.”
( e ) *Secretary of State* means the Secretary of State of the Department of State.
( f ) *Department of State* means the Department of State.
( g ) *Act* means the Mutual Educational Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, as amended (22 U.S.C. 2451 *et seq.*).
( h ) *Member of the family or household* of a Federal employee means a relative of the employee by blood, marriage, or adoption or any person who is a resident of the household of the employee.
[44 FR 42247, Sept. 20, 1978, as amended at 51 FR 11016, Apr. 1, 1986. Redesignated at 64 FR 54540, Oct. 7, 1999]
* Pursua nt to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit



## FILED

November 14, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-30136

Summary Calendar

BARTHOLOMESS ROBICHAUX,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY,

Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:04-CV-1945

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Bartholomess Robichaux, Louisiana prisoner # 91571, requests

a Certificate of Appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s

dismi ssal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as time-barred.

Robichaux argues that his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition was timely

because he timely mailed his writ application to the Louisiana

Supreme Court while incarcerated at Orleans Parish Prison in March

2001.No. 05-30136

-2-

To obtain a COA, Robichaux must make a substantial showing of

the denial of a constitutional right. S ee 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

When, as here, a district court dismisses a habeas petition on

procedural grounds without reaching the underlying constitutional

claims, a COA may not issue unless the prisoner shows that “jurists

of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a

valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that

jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district

court was correct in its procedural ruling.” S lack v. McDaniel

,

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

Robichaux has shown that reasonable jurists would debate

whether the district court’s procedural ruling was correct and has

also shown that his petition states a claim for the denial of a

constitutional right. S ee id. A ccordingly, a COA is hereby

GRANTED.

Rule X § 5(a) of the Louisiana Supreme Court Rules provides

that a petition for review of a decision of a court of appeal must

be filed within 30 days of the mailing of the notice of the

original judgment of the court of appeal. Rule X § 5(d) provides

that an application for a writ is d eemed timely if mailed before

the filing deadline. Thus the very language of the rule itself

defines filing as timely mailing, and no resort to a mailbox rule

is required. Documents submitted by Robichaux on appeal as well as

filings of record and the subsequent treatment of his writ on

direct appeal in the state courts indicate that his writNo. 05-30136

-3-

application was timely filed. S ee Grillette v. Warden

, 372 F.3d

765, 775 (5th Cir. 2004); State v. Sosa

, 888 So. 2d 192 (La. 2004).

The district court’s judgment d enying Robichaux’s 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 petition as time-barred is hereby VACATED, and this case is

REMANDED to the district court for consideration of the

constitutional claims set forth in Robich aux’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254

petition.

GRANT COA; VACATE and REMAND.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3291 

To suspend temporarily the duty on pro-jet fast black 286 stage. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2005 

Mr. CASTLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on pro-jet fast black 286 

stage. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PRO-JET FAST BLACK 286 STAGE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.13.11 Pro-jet fast black 286 stage 

[(substituted 

naphthalenylazo) substituted 

naphthalenyl azo] 

carboxyphenylene, sodium 

salt (PMN No. P–90–394) 

(provided for in subheading 

3204.14.30) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 3291 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
### §55. Field notes delivered to States; access to

Under the authority and direction of the Secretary of the Interior or such officer as he may designate, any deputy surveyor or other agent of the United States shall have free access to any field notes, maps, records, and other papers, mentioned in section 53 of this title, for the purpose of taking extracts therefrom, or making copies thereof, without charge of any kind.

(R.S. §2220; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The word "such" before "field notes" was omitted and the words "mentioned in section 53 of this title" were inserted after "papers,".

R.S. §2220 derived from act Jan. 22, 1853, ch. 24, §2, 10 Stat. 152.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out under section 1451 of this title.

"Secretary of the Interior or such officer as he may designate" substituted for "Commissioner of the General Land Office" on authority of section 403 of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946. See note set out under section 1 of this title.
#### Mary H. Williams, Respondent, v John E. Cunningham, Jr., Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered June 22, 1977 in Schenectady County, which denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the action for failure to serve a complaint. The record discloses that while originally the defendant’s counsel requested a delay for the purpose of timely entering an appearance, the plaintiff after receiving such appearance and a demand for a complaint failed to serve a complaint or take any steps to prosecute the action until after the motion herein was made pursuant to CPLR 3012 (subd [b]) to dismiss the action. The motion herein is discretionary and the affidavits on behalf of plaintiff do not establish that the action has any merit and, in fact, they tend to establish that the plaintiff has no cause for action as against the defendant. Under such circumstances, it was an abuse of discretion to deny the motion and prolong the continuance of this action. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion to dismiss complaint granted. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Larkin, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Gerard Herlihy, Chief Financial Officer of Splinex Technology Inc., certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Splinex Technology Inc.;
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;
 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the small business issuer, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 c. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small businessissuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
 5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the smallbusiness issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
 b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.   June 29, 2005 BY: /S/ Gerard Herlihy     Gerard Herlihy  Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial and Accounting  Officer and Duly Authorized Officer)
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JER Investors
Trust Inc. (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), J. Michael McGillis, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                         |  |                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | ------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                     |  | /s/ J.
MICHAEL MCGILLIS
|Date: March 31, 2009 |  | Name:                   |  | J. Michael McGillis
|                     |  |                         |  | Title:              |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.1

                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with this Annual Report of TOP Tankers Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Evangelos J. Pistiolis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Date: April 26, 2007


/s/ Evangelos J. Pistiolis
--------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 13.1





PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION





PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350











In connection with this Annual Report of Top Ships Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Evangelos J. Pistiolis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date: April 30, 2013

















Evangelos J. Pistiolis


Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
#### § 891.685 Prohibited relationships.

The requirements for prohibited relationships for 202/162 projects are provided in § 891.130.
### §50107. Studies on marine insurance

The Secretary of Transportation shall—

(1) examine into the subject of marine insurance, the number of companies in the United States, domestic and foreign, engaging in marine insurance, the extent of the insurance on hulls and cargoes placed or written in the United States, and the extent of reinsurance of American maritime risks in foreign companies; and

(2) ascertain what steps may be necessary to develop an ample marine insurance system as an aid in the development of the merchant marine of the United States.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(b), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1559.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 50107 | 46 App.:811 (2d sentence words after 2d comma). | Sept. 7, 1916, ch. 451, §12 (2d sentence words after 2d comma), 39 Stat. 732; Ex. Ord. No. 6166, §12, eff. June 10, 1933; June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title II, §204, title IX, §904, 49 Stat. 1987, 2016; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(27), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 155. |

Section
### §53724. Rights to secured property

(a) Acquisition of Security Rights.—When the Secretary or Administrator makes a payment on, or assumes, an obligation under section 53721 or 53722 of this title, the Secretary or Administrator acquires the rights under the security agreement with the obligor in the security held by the Secretary or Administrator to guarantee the obligation.

(b) Use and Disposition of Secured Property.—Notwithstanding any other law relating to the acquisition, handling, or disposal of property by the United States Government, the Secretary or Administrator has the right, in the Secretary's or Administrator's discretion, to complete, reconstruct, recondition, renovate, repair, maintain, operate, charter, or sell any property acquired under a security agreement with an obligor, or to place a vessel so acquired in the National Defense Reserve Fleet. The terms of a sale under this subsection shall be as approved by the Secretary or Administrator.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1619; Pub. L. 109–163, div. C, title XXXV, §3507(a)(1)(F), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3555; Pub. L. 110–181, div. C, title XXXV, §3522(a)(10)(B), (11), (b), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 598.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 53724 | 46 App.:1275(c). | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title XI, §1105(c), as added June 23, 1938, ch. 600, §46, 52 Stat. 971; Aug. 15, 1953, ch. 513, §3, 67 Stat. 626; Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1265, §5, 68 Stat. 1272; Aug. 7, 1956, ch. 1026, §1(e)–(g), 70 Stat. 1087; Pub. L. 85–520, July 15, 1958, 72 Stat. 358; Pub. L. 91–469, §33, Oct. 21, 1970, 84 Stat. 1035; restated Pub. L. 92–507, §3, Oct. 19, 1972, 86 Stat. 914; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(136), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 166; Pub. L. 98–595, §1(10), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 3131. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–181, §3522(b), repealed Pub. L. 109–163, §3507(a)(1)(F). See 2006 Amendment note below.

Pub. L. 110–181, §3522(a)(10)(B), (11), incorporated the substance of the amendment by Pub. L. 109–163, §3507(a)(1)(F), into this section by inserting "or Administrator" after "Secretary" wherever appearing and, in subsec. (b), "or Administrator's" after "Secretary's". See 2006 Amendment note below and section 18(a) of Pub. L. 109–304, set out as a Legislative Purpose and Construction note preceding section 101 of this title.

2006—Pub. L. 109–163, §3507(a)(1)(F), which directed the amendment of section 1275(c) of the former Appendix to this title from which this section was derived, was repealed by Pub. L. 110–181, §3522(b). See 2008 Amendment notes and Historical and Revision notes above.
CITY OF BILLINGS

AVIATION AND TRANSIT DEPARTMENT

19011Terminal Circle, Room 216

Billings Logan International Airport

Billings, Montana 59105-1996

(406) 657-8495

(406) 657-8438 FAX

www.flybillings.com

Thomas H. Binford, A.A.E.

Director of Auiation and Transit

Kevin Ploehn

Assistant Director of Aviation and Transit

August 2, 2013

_ Mr. Dennis De...\lany __ .__

Chief, Essential Air Service Division, X-53

Office of Aviation Analysis

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE

Washington, D.C. 20590

~--...---- -

.'-....

..•.•...

J>

Dear Mr. DeVany: .;.::~

__ ~ ';.rr

-.

'. ;'~

""'~I

RE: Docket DOS-OST-1997-2605

Please accept this letter of support from the Billings Logan International Airport endorsing Cape

Air as the next Essential Air Service provider for the eastern Montana cities of Havre, Glasgow,

Glendive, Sidney, and Wolf Point. On July 25, 2013, the Montana Essential Air Service Task

Force met at the Billings Airport Terminal to discuss three proposals received for the next

Essential Air Service contract for Montana. Cape Air was the only proposer to offer all of the

communities the type of service those communities desired. Specifically, flights to and from the

Billings Airport, secured flights from the originating airport into Billings so that passengers that

are connecting onto another flight do not have to go through screening in Billings, and an actual

presence at the Billings Airport and in each community.

The communities were unanimous in their selection of Cape Air (Option A), and the Billings

Logan International Airport wholeheartedly supports that decision.

Sincerely,

~

Kevin Ploehn

Assistant Director of Aviation and Transit

KP:mdb

cc: EAS File

Chrono

T. Binford

Debbie Alke, MT Aeronautics

"Expect Excellence"