[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 237 (Wednesday, December 9, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 79244-79248]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26989]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-90555; File No. SR-MEMX-2020-14]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; MEMX LLC; Notice of Filing and 
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the 
Exchange's Fee Schedule

December 3, 2020.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that on November 30, 2020, MEMX LLC (``MEMX'' or the ``Exchange'') 
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') 
the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, 
which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is 
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change 
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is filing with the Commission a proposed rule change 
to amend the fee schedule applicable to Members \3\ pursuant to 
Exchange Rules 15.1(a) and (c) in order to (i) provide pricing for 
Retail Orders \4\ that add displayed liquidity and are executed on the 
Exchange; and (ii) provide pricing for transactions in securities 
priced below $1.00 per share that are executed on the Exchange. The 
text of the proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Exchange Rule 1.5(p).
    \4\ A ``Retail Order'' means an agency or riskless principal 
order that meets the criteria of FINRA Rule 5320.03 that originates 
from a natural person and is submitted to the Exchange by a Retail 
Member Organization, provided that no change is made to the terms of 
the order with respect to price or side of market and the order does 
not originate from a trading algorithm or any other computerized 
methodology. See Exchange Rule 11.21(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to modify its fee schedule to adopt the fees 
and rebates described herein applicable to Retail Orders that add 
displayed liquidity to the Exchange (``Added

[[Page 79245]]

Displayed Retail Volume'') and transactions in securities priced below 
$1.00 per share (``Sub-Dollar Securities'') that are executed on the 
Exchange, effective as of December 1, 2020.
    The Exchange first notes that it operates in a highly competitive 
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to 
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be 
excessive or incentives to be insufficient. More specifically, the 
Exchange is only one of 16 registered equities exchanges, as well as a 
number of alternative trading systems and other off-exchange venues, to 
which market participants may direct their order flow. Based on 
publicly available information, no single registered equities exchange 
currently has more than approximately 16% of the total market share of 
executed volume of equities trading.\5\ Thus, in such a low-
concentrated and highly competitive market, no single equities exchange 
possesses significant pricing power in the execution of order flow, and 
the Exchange currently represents less than 1% of the overall market 
share.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Market share percentage calculated as of November 24, 2020. 
The Exchange receives and processes data made available through 
consolidated data feeds (i.e., CTS and UTDF).
    \6\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rebate for Added Displayed Retail Volume
    The Exchange recently adopted rules enabling Members to apply for 
status as Retail Member Organizations,\7\ and once approved as such by 
the Exchange, to designate qualifying orders as Retail Orders to the 
Exchange.\8\ Currently, there are no pricing incentives for Retail 
Orders, and Retail Orders are subject to the same standard fees and 
rebates applicable as if such orders were not designated as Retail 
Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ A ``Retail Member Organization'' or ``RMO'' is a Member (or 
a division thereof) that has been approved by the Exchange under 
Exchange Rule 11.21 to submit Retail Orders. See Exchange Rule 
11.21(a).
    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90278 (October 28, 
2020), 85 FR 69667 (November 3, 2020) (SR-MEMX-2020-13). Retail 
Orders are only designated as such to the Exchange and are not 
identified as such on the Exchange's market data feeds or otherwise 
identifiable as such to other market participants. See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to modify its fee schedule to adopt pricing 
for executions of Added Displayed Retail Volume and to adopt a fee code 
applicable to executions of all Retail Orders. Specifically, the 
Exchange proposes to adopt a rebate of $0.0034 per share for executions 
of Added Displayed Retail Volume transactions in securities traded on 
the Exchange priced at or above $1.00 per share (the ``ADRV 
Rebate'').\9\ The Exchange notes that the proposed ADRV Rebate would 
not apply, and that the proposed standard pricing with respect to 
transactions in Sub-Dollar Securities, as further described below, 
would apply, to executions of Added Displayed Retail Volume 
transactions in Sub-Dollar Securities. The Exchange also notes that the 
proposed ADVR Rebate would not apply to executions of Retail Orders in 
securities priced at or above $1.00 per share that add non-displayed 
liquidity to the Exchange or remove liquidity from the Exchange, and 
instead, the fees and rebates otherwise applicable to such transactions 
under the current fee schedule would continue to apply. Thus, under the 
proposal, an execution of a Retail Order in a security priced at or 
above $1.00 per share that adds non-displayed liquidity to the Exchange 
would receive a rebate of $0.0020 per share, which is the standard 
rebate for adding non-displayed liquidity to the Exchange, and an 
execution of a Retail Order in a security priced at or above $1.00 per 
share that removes liquidity from the Exchange would be charged a fee 
of $0.0025 per share, which is the standard fee for removing liquidity 
from the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ This proposed pricing is referred to by the Exchange as 
``Added displayed volume, Retail Order'' on the fee schedule. The 
Exchange is also proposing to adopt new fee code ``r'' to be 
appended as the second character after the applicable first fee code 
character for executions of all Retail Orders. The Exchange notes 
that, as indicated on the current fee schedule, the Exchange also 
appends as an additional character at the end of its fee codes 
either ``A'' or ``B'' to indicate whether an execution occurred: (A) 
In a security priced at or above $1.00 per share or (B) in a Sub-
Dollar Security. Accordingly, under the proposal, an execution of an 
Added Displayed Retail Volume transaction in a security priced at or 
above $1.00 per share would be assigned a fee code of ``BrA'', 
``DrA'' or ``JrA'', as applicable, by the Exchange. Similarly, under 
the proposal, an execution of an Added Displayed Retail Volume 
transaction in a Sub-Dollar Security would be assigned a fee code of 
``BrB'', ``DrB'' or ``JrB'', as applicable, by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pricing for Transactions in Sub-Dollar Securities
    The Exchange currently does not charge any fees or provide any 
rebates for transactions in Sub-Dollar Securities that are executed on 
the Exchange. The Exchange now proposes to charge a standard fee of 
0.30% of the total dollar value of any transaction (including a Retail 
Order) in Sub-Dollar Securities that removes liquidity from the 
Exchange (``Removed Sub-Dollar Volume'').\10\ The Exchange also 
proposes to provide a standard rebate of 0.30% of the total dollar 
value of any transaction (including a Retail Order) in Sub-Dollar 
Securities that adds liquidity, displayed or non-displayed, to the 
Exchange (``Added Sub-Dollar Volume'').\11\ The proposed pricing for 
Removed Sub-Dollar Volume and Added Sub-Dollar Volume would only apply 
to transactions that are executed on the Exchange, and as such there 
would continue to be no fee charged or rebate provided for transactions 
in Sub-Dollar Securities that are routed to and executed at another 
market center.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ This pricing is referred to by the Exchange on the fee 
schedule under the existing description ``Removed volume from MEMX 
Book'' with a fee code of ``RB'' or ``RrB'', as applicable, assigned 
by the Exchange.
    \11\ This pricing is referred to by the Exchange on the fee 
schedule under the existing description ``Added displayed volume'', 
the existing description ``Added non-displayed volume'' or the 
proposed new description ``Added displayed volume, Retail Order'', 
as applicable, with a fee code of ``BB'', ``BrB'', ``DB'', ``DrB'', 
``JB'', ``JrB'', ``HB'', ``HrB'', ``MB'' or ``MrB'', as applicable, 
assigned by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rebate for executions of Added Sub-Dollar Volume is 
intended to increase order flow in Sub-Dollar Securities to the 
Exchange by incentivizing Members to increase the liquidity-providing 
orders in Sub-Dollar Securities they submit to the Exchange, which 
would support price discovery on the Exchange and provide additional 
liquidity for incoming orders. The proposed fee for executions of 
Removed Sub-Dollar Volume is intended to be a direct offset of the 
rebate provided for Added Sub-Dollar Volume so that the Exchange may 
remain revenue neutral with respect to such transactions while 
attempting to compete with other venues to attract this order flow.
    The proposed rule change does not include different fees or rebates 
for Retail Orders or transactions in Sub-Dollar Securities that depend 
on the amount of orders submitted to, and/or transactions executed on 
or through, the Exchange. Accordingly, all fees and rebates described 
above are applicable to all Members, regardless of the overall volume 
of a Member's trading activities on the Exchange.

2. Statutory Basis

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with the provisions of Section 6(b) of the Act,\12\ in general, and 
furthers the objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,\13\ in 
particular, in that it is designed to provide for the equitable 
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among its Members 
and other persons using its facilities and is

[[Page 79246]]

not designed to unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, 
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As discussed above, the Exchange operates in a highly fragmented 
and competitive market in which market participants can readily direct 
order flow to competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular 
venue to be excessive or incentives to be insufficient, and the 
Exchange represents only a small percentage of the overall market. The 
Commission and the courts have repeatedly expressed their preference 
for competition over regulatory intervention in determining prices, 
products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation NMS, 
the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in 
determining prices and SRO revenues and also recognized that current 
regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in 
promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most 
important to investors and listed companies.'' \14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005), 
70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the ever-shifting market share among the 
exchanges from month to month demonstrates that market participants can 
shift order flow or discontinue to reduce use of certain categories of 
products, in response to new or different pricing structures being 
introduced into the market. Accordingly, competitive forces constrain 
the Exchange's transaction fees and rebates, including with respect to 
Added Displayed Retail Volume and transactions in Sub-Dollar 
Securities, and market participants can readily trade on competing 
venues if they deem pricing levels at those other venues to be more 
favorable. The Exchange believes the proposed rule change reflects a 
reasonable and competitive pricing structure designed to incentivize 
market participants to direct order flow to the Exchange, which the 
Exchange believes would enhance market quality to the benefit of all 
Members and investors. The Exchange notes that the proposal does not 
include different fees or rebates for Retail Orders or transactions in 
Sub-Dollar Securities depending on the amount of orders submitted to, 
and/or transactions executed on or through, the Exchange. Accordingly, 
the proposed pricing structure is applicable to all Members, regardless 
of the overall volume of a Member's trading activities on the Exchange.
Rebate for Added Displayed Retail Volume
    The Exchange believes that the proposed ADRV Rebate is reasonable, 
equitable, and consistent with the Act because it would incentivize 
Members to submit additional displayed Retail Orders to the Exchange, 
which would enhance liquidity in Retail Orders on the Exchange and 
promote price discovery. The Exchange believes that this increased 
displayed liquidity would potentially stimulate further price 
competition for Retail Orders, thereby deepening the Exchange's 
liquidity pool, enhancing market quality to the benefit of all Members 
and investors by providing more trading opportunities, supporting price 
discovery, and subjecting such transactions to the Exchange's 
transparency, regulation, and oversight as a registered national 
securities exchange.
    The Exchange notes that a significant percentage of the orders of 
individual (i.e., retail) investors are executed over-the-counter.\15\ 
In addition, other exchanges maintain special pricing to encourage 
entry of retail orders to their markets, in part, to compete against 
the over-the-counter market.\16\ Without such pricing, the Exchange is 
not currently competitive with such other exchanges. The Exchange 
believes that it is thus appropriate to create a financial incentive to 
bring more Retail Order flow to the Exchange. The Exchange believes 
that investor protection and transparency is promoted by rewarding 
displayed liquidity on exchanges, including the Exchange. By offering a 
proposed ADRV Rebate of $0.0034, which is higher than the Exchange's 
standard rebate of $0.0029 for executions of added displayed volume, 
the Exchange believes it will encourage use of Retail Orders, while 
maintaining consistency with the Exchange's overall pricing philosophy 
of encouraging displayed liquidity. The Exchange places a higher value 
on displayed liquidity because the Exchange believes that displayed 
liquidity is a public good that benefits investors generally by 
providing greater price transparency and enhancing public price 
discovery, which ultimately lead to substantial reductions in 
transaction costs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See, e.g., SEC Staff Report on Algorithmic Trading in U.S. 
Capital Markets (August 5, 2020), available at https://www.sec.gov/files/Algo_Trading_Report_2020.pdf.
    \16\ See infra note 17.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Furthermore, the Exchange believes that the proposed ADRV Rebate of 
$0.0034 per share is reasonable and equitable because it is comparable 
to, and competitive with, the rebates provided by other exchanges for 
added displayed retail liquidity in securities priced at or above $1.00 
per share.\17\ The Exchange also believes that providing a rebate to 
the liquidity adder, and charging a fee to the liquidity remover, with 
respect to the execution of a displayed Retail Order is reasonable, 
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it is designed, and 
the Exchange believes it is an appropriate effort, to incentivize 
displayable liquidity provision on the Exchange, thereby contributing 
to price discovery and price formation, consistent with the overall 
goal of enhancing market quality. Moreover, the Exchange notes that 
several other exchanges provide rebates to the liquidity adder, and 
charge fees to the liquidity remover, with respect to executions of 
retail orders, and that this aspect of the proposed ADRV Rebate does 
not raise any new or novel issues that have not previously been 
considered by the Commission in connection with the fees and rebates of 
other exchanges.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See, e.g., The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC equities trading fee 
schedule on its public website (available at http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/trader.aspx?id=pricelisttrading2), which 
reflects rebates to add displayed designated retail liquidity 
ranging from $0.00325-$0.0033 per share depending on the percentage 
add to total volume ratio, and a standard fee that generally applies 
to retail orders that remove liquidity of $0.0030 per share; the 
NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'') equities trading fee schedule on its 
public website (available at https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/markets/nyse-arca/NYSE_Arca_Marketplace_Fees.pdf), which reflects 
rebates for retail orders that provide displayed liquidity ranging 
from $0.0033-$0.0038 per share depending on the applicable tier; the 
Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (``Cboe EDGX'') equities trading fee 
schedule on its public website (available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/membership/fee_schedule/edgx/), which 
reflects rebates for retail orders that add liquidity ranging from 
$0.0032-$0.0037 per share depending on the applicable tier, and a 
standard fee that generally applies to retail orders that remove 
liquidity of $0.0027 per share.
    \18\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange understands that Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \19\ 
prohibits an exchange from establishing rules that are designed to 
permit unfair discrimination between market participants. However, 
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act does not prohibit exchange members or other 
broker-dealers from discriminating, so long as their activities are 
otherwise consistent with the federal securities laws. While the 
Exchange believes that markets and price discovery optimally function 
through the interactions of diverse flow types, it also believes that 
growth in internalization has required differentiation of Retail Order 
flow from

[[Page 79247]]

other order flow types. The differentiation proposed herein by the 
Exchange is not designed to permit unfair discrimination, but instead 
to promote a competitive process around Retail Order executions such 
that retail investors would receive better rebates on the Exchange than 
they do currently in order to encourage entry of retail orders to the 
Exchange. Accordingly, the Exchange believes the proposed ADRV Rebate 
is not unfairly discriminatory.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pricing for Transactions in Sub-Dollar Securities
    The Exchange believes that the proposed changes with respect to 
pricing for executions of transactions in Sub-Dollar Securities would 
incentivize submission of additional liquidity in Sub-Dollar Securities 
to the Exchange through the proposed rebate of 0.30% of the total 
dollar value of any Added Sub-Dollar Volume transactions, thereby 
promoting price discovery and transparency, and enhancing order 
execution opportunities for all Members. The Exchange believes that the 
proposed rebate for Added Sub-Dollar Volume is reasonable because it 
would incentivize Members to direct more order flow in Sub-Dollar 
Securities to the Exchange. The Exchange notes that other exchanges 
provide rebates for liquidity-adding transactions in Sub-Dollar 
Securities, but that these are denominated in dollar amounts per share 
rather than a percentage of the total dollar amount of the 
transaction.\20\ The Exchange expects that the proposed rebate for 
Added Sub-Dollar Volume transactions would typically result in a higher 
overall credit for a given transaction than the rebates offered by 
other exchanges, although the Exchange notes that it may also result in 
a lower overall credit for such transaction depending on the number of 
shares traded and the total dollar value of the transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ See, e.g., the Cboe EDGX equities trading fee schedule on 
its public website (available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/membership/fee_schedule/edgx/), which reflects a rebate of 
$0.00009 per share for liquidity-adding transactions in securities 
priced below $1.00 per share; the NYSE Arca equities trading fee 
schedule on its public website (available at https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/markets/nyse-arca/NYSE_Arca_Marketplace_Fees.pdf), 
which reflects a rebate of $0.00004 per share for liquidity-adding 
transactions in securities priced below $1.00 per share.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also believes that the proposed fee for Removed Sub-
Dollar Volume is reasonable because it is in line with the fees charged 
by other exchanges for liquidity-removing transactions in Sub-Dollar 
Securities.\21\ The Exchange believes that, given the competitive 
environment in which the Exchange currently operates, the proposed 
pricing structure, with an offsetting fee and rebate, with respect to 
executions of transactions in Sub-Dollar Securities, is a reasonable 
attempt to increase liquidity in Sub-Dollar Securities on the Exchange 
and improve the Exchange's market share relative to its competitors 
while remaining revenue neutral with respect to such transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ See, e.g., the Cboe EDGX equities trading fee schedule on 
its public website (available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/membership/fee_schedule/edgx/), which reflects a fee of 
0.30% of the total dollar value of the transaction for liquidity-
removing transactions in securities priced below $1.00 per share; 
the Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. equities trading fee schedule on its 
public website (available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/membership/fee_schedule/bzx/), which reflects a fee of 0.30% of the 
total dollar value of the transaction for liquidity-removing 
transactions in securities priced below $1.00 per share; the NYSE 
Arca equities trading fee schedule on its public website (available 
at https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/markets/nyse-arca/NYSE_Arca_Marketplace_Fees.pdf), which reflects a fee of 0.295% of 
the total dollar value for liquidity-taking transactions in 
securities priced below $1.00 per share.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also believes that the proposed fee and rebate 
structure applicable to executions of transactions in Sub-Dollar 
Securities is equitably allocated and not unfairly discriminatory 
because it applies equally to all Members and is reasonably related to 
the value of the Exchange's market quality associated with higher 
volume. A number of Members currently transact in Sub-Dollar Securities 
and they, along with additional Members that choose to direct order 
flow in Sub-Dollar Securities to the Exchange, would all qualify for 
the proposed fee and rebate. The Exchange believes that maintaining or 
increasing the proportion of transactions in Sub-Dollar Securities that 
are executed on the Exchange would benefit all investors by deepening 
the Exchange's liquidity pool, which would support price discovery, 
promote market transparency and improve investor protection, further 
rendering the proposed changes reasonable and equitable.
    In conclusion, the Exchange also submits that its proposed fee 
structure satisfies the requirements of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of 
the Act for the reasons discussed above in that it provides for the 
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among 
its Members and other persons using its facilities and is not designed 
to unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers, or 
dealers. As described more fully below in the Exchange's statement 
regarding the burden on competition, the Exchange believes that its 
transaction pricing, including with respect to Retail Orders and 
transactions in Sub-Dollar Securities, is subject to significant 
competitive forces, and that the proposed fees and rebates described 
herein are appropriate to address such forces.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Instead, as 
discussed above, the Exchange believes that the proposed change would 
encourage the submission of additional order flow, including Retail 
Orders and orders in Sub-Dollar Securities, to the Exchange, thereby 
promoting market depth, enhanced execution opportunities, as well as 
price discovery and transparency for all Members. Furthermore, the 
Exchange believes that the proposed changes would allow the Exchange to 
compete more ably with other execution venues by providing more 
competitive pricing for Added Displayed Retail Volume and transactions 
in Sub-Dollar Securities, thereby making it a more desirable 
destination venue for its customers. As a result, the Exchange believes 
that the proposed change furthers the Commission's goal in adopting 
Regulation NMS of fostering competition among orders, which promotes 
``more efficient pricing of individual stocks for all types of orders, 
large and small.'' \22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See supra note 14.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Intramarket Competition
    The Exchange believes that the proposed changes would incentivize 
market participants to direct more order flow to the Exchange. Greater 
liquidity benefits all Members by providing more trading opportunities 
and encourages Members to send orders to the Exchange, thereby 
contributing to robust levels of liquidity, which benefits all Members. 
The proposed fees and rebates for Added Displayed Retail Volume and 
transactions in Sub-Dollar Securities would be available to all 
similarly-situated market participants, and, as such, the proposed 
change would not impose a disparate burden on competition among market 
participants on the Exchange. As such, the Exchange believes the 
proposed changes would not impose any burden on intramarket competition 
that is not necessary or

[[Page 79248]]

appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Intermarket Competition
    The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market. Members have 
numerous alternative venues that they may participate on and direct 
their order flow to, including 15 other equities exchanges and numerous 
alternative trading systems and other off-exchange venues. As noted 
above, no single registered equities exchange currently has more than 
approximately 16% of the total market share of executed volume of 
equities trading, and the Exchange currently represents less than 1% of 
the overall market share. Thus, in such a low-concentrated and highly 
competitive market, no single equities exchange possesses significant 
pricing power in the execution of order flow. Moreover, the Exchange 
believes that the ever-shifting market share among the exchanges from 
month to month demonstrates that market participants can shift order 
flow or discontinue to reduce use of certain categories of products, in 
response to new or different pricing structures being introduced into 
the market. Accordingly, competitive forces constrain the Exchange's 
transaction fees and rebates, including with respect to Added Displayed 
Retail Volume and transactions in Sub-Dollar Securities, and market 
participants can readily choose to send their orders to other exchange 
and off-exchange venues if they deem fee levels at those other venues 
to be more favorable. As described above, the proposed changes are 
competitive proposals through which the Exchange is seeking to 
encourage certain order flow to be sent to the Exchange.
    Additionally, the Commission has repeatedly expressed its 
preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining 
prices, products, and services in the securities markets. Specifically, 
in Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the importance of market 
forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized 
that current regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably 
successful in promoting market competition in its broader forms that 
are most important to investors and listed companies.'' \23\ The fact 
that this market is competitive has also long been recognized by the 
courts. In NetCoalition v. SEC, the D.C. Circuit stated as follows: 
``[n]o one disputes that competition for order flow is `fierce.' . . . 
As the SEC explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market system, buyers and 
sellers of securities, and the broker-dealers that act as their order-
routing agents, have a wide range of choices of where to route orders 
for execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to take its market share 
percentages for granted' because `no exchange possesses a monopoly, 
regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of order flow from broker 
dealers'. . . .''.\24\ Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe its 
proposed fee change imposes any burden on competition that is not 
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ See supra note 14.
    \24\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010) 
(quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2, 
2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSE-2006-21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \25\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \26\ thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \26\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to 
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

    <bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
    <bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#daa8afb6bff7b9b5b7b7bfb4aea99aa9bfb9f4bdb5ac"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bfcdcad3da92dcd0d2d2dad1cbccffccdadc91d8d0c9">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include 
File Number SR-MEMX-2020-14 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

    <bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-MEMX-2020-14. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection 
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments 
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are 
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying 
information from comment submissions. You should submit only 
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions 
should refer to File Number SR-MEMX-2020-14, and should be submitted on 
or before December 30, 2020.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-26989 Filed 12-8-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>