alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### R L ELDRIDGE CONSTRUCTION INC; Texas Mutual Insurance Company, Petitioners v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKER’S COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, U.S. Department of Labor, Son Nguyen, Respondents.

No. 06-60423.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 3, 2007.

Peter Thompson, for Petitioners.

Benefits Review Board, Donald Shire, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC, Chris J. Gleasman, U.S. Department of Labor OWCP-Longshore Division, Houston, TX, for Respondents.

Son Nguyen, pro se.

Before KING, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Decision and Order of the Benefits Review Board, holding that substantial evidence supported the decision of the administrative law judge that the employer and carrier failed to establish the existence of suitable alternative employment for the claimant, is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
§ 100.7 Notice of proposed penalty; notice of contest. ( a ) A notice of proposed penalty will be issued and served by certified mail, or the equivalent, upon the party to be charged and by regular mail to the representative of miners at the mine after the time permitted to request a conference under § 100.6 expires, or upon the completion of a conference, or upon review by MSHA of additional information submitted in a timely manner.
( b ) Upon receipt of the notice of proposed penalty, the party charged shall have 30 days to either: ( 1 ) Pay the proposed assessment. Acceptance by MSHA of payment tendered by the party charged will close the case.
( 2 ) Notify MSHA in writing of the intention to contest the proposed penalty. When MSHA receives the notice of contest, it advises the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (Commission) of such notice. No proposed penalty which has been contested before the Commission shall be compromised, mitigated or settled except with the approval of the Commission.
( c ) If the proposed penalty is not paid or contested within 30 days of receipt, the proposed penalty becomes a final order of the Commission and is not subject to review by any court or agency.
#### § 570.5 Waivers.

HUD's authority for the waiver of regulations and for the suspension of requirements to address damage in a Presidentially declared disaster area is described in 24 CFR part 5 and in section 122 of the Act, respectively.

[61 FR 11476, Mar. 20, 1996]
#### § 811.106 Default under the contract.

If HUD finds there is a default under the Contract, the field office shall so notify the trustee and give the trustee a specified reasonable time to take action to require the owner to correct such default prior to any suspension or termination of payments under the contract. In the event of a default under the contract, HUD may terminate or suspend payments under the contract, may seek specific performance of the contract and may pursue other remedies.

[44 FR 12360, Mar. 6, 1979, as amended at 61 FR 14461, Apr. 1, 1996]
Exhibit 99.2


KPMG logo here


KPMG LLP
Suite 2000
355 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1568

Independent Accountants' Report

The Board of Directors
Countrywide Financial Corporation:

We have examined the accompanying management's assertion, that Countrywide
Financial Corporation and subsidiaries, including its wholly-owned subsidiary
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (CHL) and Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P.,
a wholly-owned subsidiary of CHL, (collectively, the Company) complied with
the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association
of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP)
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004.  Management is responsible
for the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards specified above and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Countrywide Financial Corporation
and subsidiaries, including its wholly-owned subsidiary Countrywide Home Loans,
Inc. (CHL) and Countrywide Home Loan Servicing, L.P., a wholly-owned subsidiary
of CHL, complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2004 is fairly stated, in all material
respects.

/s/: KPMG LLP

March 17, 2005

<page>

Countrywide Home Loans logo here

2900 Madera Road
Simi Valley, California 93065-6298
(805) 955-1000

Management's Assertion
March 17, 2005

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2004, Countrywide Financial
Corporation and Subsidiaries (which includes its wholly-owned subsidiary,
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. ("CHL"), and Countrywide Home Loans Servicing,
L.P., a wholly-owned subsidiary of CHL) (the "Company") has complied in
all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in
the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers.  As of and for this same period, the Company
had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the amount
of $200 million and $100 million, respectively.

/s/: Thomas K McLaughlin
     Thomas K McLaughlin
     Executive Managing Director and
     Chief Financial Officer

/s/: Kevin Meyers
     Kevin Meyers
     Managing Director, Chief Financial Officer
     Loan Administration
#### § 970.33 Effect on the Operating Fund Program and Capital Fund Program.

The provisions of 24 CFR part 990, the Public Housing Operating Fund Program, and 24 CFR part 905, the Public Housing Capital Fund Program, apply.
#### In the Matter of Denise Giacopelli, Respondent, v Frank Giacopelli, Appellant.

In a support proceeding pursuant to the Uniform Support of Dependents Law, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, *1000Rockland County, dated April 27, 1977, which, after a hearing, modified, in certain respects, a prior support order of the same court, found appellant to be in willful violation of that order, and sentenced him to five days in jail, with a purge provision. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The Family Court did.not abuse its discretion in fixing the amount of child support. In view of the children’s needs, and the appellant’s average monthly income of approximately $1;000, we find the direction to pay $200 a month in child support, plus $40 a month toward reduction of arrears, to be reasonable. Although the Family Court erred in refusing to allow the appellant an opportunity to present evidence as to the denial of his visitation rights, for reasons which will become apparent, we are not disposed to upset the order appealed from. In *Abraham v Abraham*(44 AD2d 675) we held that a father’s obligation to support his children should be suspended when the mother removes the children to a distant location without apparent justification (see, also, *Borax v Borax,*4 NY2d 113, 116; *Callender v Callender,*37 AD2d 360). However, it is also clear that such claims must be approached on a case-by-case basis and that the mere change in residence of the custodial parent will not automatically result in the suspension of the obligation of support (cf. *Matter of Sawyer v Larkin,*37 AD2d 929). Among the factors to be considered are whether the distance effectively frustrated regular visitation, whether the decree or agreement expressly prohibited relocation, the reason behind the move, the length of time between the relocation and the father’s complaint in court, and the extent of the father’s actual visitation prior to the move *(Abraham v Abraham, supra; Matter of Goldberg v Berger,*31 AD2d 637; *Matter of Nicolette G. v Raymond S.,*90 Misc 2d 848). Although it was error to ignore these issues at the support hearing, subsequent proceedings in the Family Court rendered this error harmless. When the appellant father brought a proceeding for downward modification of the support order, the Family Court, subsequent to the taking of this appeal, affirmed as to the amount of the obligation, but provided for the setting aside of $15 per week of the support paid as a transportation fund to facilitate visits between the appellant and his children. Since this remedy adequately protected the appellant’s visitation rights (see *Matter of Sandra B. v Charles B.,*85 Misc 2d 633), there is no reason to remand for a further hearing. Latham, J. P., Damiani, Hawkins and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
#### Federal Insurance Company et al., Appellants, v. Associated Operating Co., Respondent.

Order entered on February 23, 1960, granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint herein as barred by the Statute of Limitations, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Yalente, Stevens and Bastow, JJ.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of McNab Creek Gold Corp. (the"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, KennethG. Townsend, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Sect.1350, as adopted pursuant to Sect. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the27 day of February, 2007.

_______ 

Chief Executive Officer

----

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of McNab Creek Gold Corp. (the"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,Christopher Turley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Sect. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sect. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the27th day of February, 2007.

_______ 

Chief Financial Officer
From: Angus Crane [acrane@naima.org]

Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 3:34 PM

To: Hancy, Cindy Wang

Cc: Fairchild.Susan@epamail.epa.gov; Reeves, David

Subject: NAIMA's Response for the Fiber Glass Industry to EPA's Formaldehyde and Collection

Questions

Attachments: RR3182.pdf

Dear. Ms. Hancy:

Please find attached NAIMA’s response on behalf of the fiber glass industry to EPA’s questions related

to formaldehyde and the collection chamber.

If you have any que stions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,



## Angus E. Crane

Angus E. Crane

Executive Vice President, General Counsel

North American Insulation Manufacturers Association

Ph: (703) 684

- 0084 ext. 123

Fax: (703) 684

- 0427

Visit NAIMA online at:

www.NAIMA.org

www.PipeInsulation.org
### **CHAPTER 109—PROCEEDINGS ON UNSEAWORTHINESS**

Sec.
10901.
Application.
10902.
Complaints of unfitness.
10903.
Proceedings on examination of vessel.
10904.
Refusal to proceed.
10905.
Complaints in foreign ports.
10906.
Discharge of crew for unsuitability.
10907.
Permission to make complaint.
10908.
Penalty for sending unseaworthy vessel to sea.
#### § 943.144 What financial impact do operations of a subsidiary, affiliate, or joint venture have on a PHA?

Income generated by subsidiaries, affiliates, or joint ventures formed under the authority of this subpart is to be used for low-income housing or to benefit the residents assisted by the PHA. This income will not cause a decrease in funding provided under the public housing program, except as otherwise provided under the Operating Fund and Capital Fund formulas.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (the Company), each hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)
The Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                             
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: February 12, 2009 |  | /s/ Arthur L. Buser, Jr.                    
|                        |  | Arthur L. Buser, Jr. Chief Executive Officer
|                        | 
|Date: February 12, 2009 |  | /s/ Kenneth E. Cruse                        
|                        |  | Kenneth E. Cruse Chief Financial Officer
J.K.J. AND J.A.J.

,

Appellant s
,

v.

L.L.L.S.

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 3582

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 9, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County

. Kelvin C. Wells , Judge

.

Brian Norback of Legal Services of North Florida, Inc., Fort Walton Beach , for Appellant s

.

Daniel W. Uhlfelder of Daniel W. Uhlfelder, P.A., Santa Rosa Beach , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS

, C.J., JAY and WINSOR

, J J

. , CONCUR.
§ 203.24 Application of payments. ( a ) All monthly payments to be made by the mortgagor to the mortgagee shall be added together and the aggregate amount thereof shall be paid by the mortgagor each month in a single payment. The mortgagee shall apply the same to the following items in the order set forth: ( 1 ) Premium charges under the contract of insurance (other than a one-time or up-front mortgage insurance premium paid in accordance with §§ 203.280, 203.284 and 203.285), charges for ground rents, taxes, special assessments, flood insurance premiums, if required, and fire and other hazard insurance premiums;
( 2 ) Interest on the mortgage;
( 3 ) Amortization of the principal of the mortgage; and
( 4 ) Late charges, if permitted under the terms of the mortgage and subject to such conditions as the Commissioner may prescribe.
( b ) Any deficiency in the amount of any such aggregate monthly payment shall, unless made good by the mortgagor prior to, or on, the due date of the next such payment, constitute an event of default under the mortgage.
[36 FR 24508, Dec. 22, 1971, as amended at 37 FR 25231, Nov. 29, 1972; 50 FR 25914, June 24, 1985; 61 FR 36263, July 9, 1996]
§ 93.250 Income targeting. ( a ) In any fiscal year in which the total amount available for allocation of HTF funds is less than $1 billion, the grantee must use 100 percent of its HTF grant for the benefit of extremely low-income families or families with incomes at or below the poverty line (whichever is greater). In any fiscal year in which the total amount available for allocation of HTF funds is greater than $1 billion, the grantee must use at least 75 percent of its grant for the benefit of extremely low-income families or families with incomes at or below the poverty line.
( b ) Any grant funds not used in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section must be used for the benefit of very-low income families.
19°57’

19°54’

19°S1’

19° 48’

19°45"

19° 42’

19°39°

19° 36’

19°33°

19° 30’

00” : ' ov 20°00’ 00”
go” 19°57’ 00”
00" 19°54’ 00"
00” 19°51' 00"
00” 19°48’ 00”
00" 19°45’ 00”
90" 19°42’ 00"
00” 19°39’ 00"
00" S$ 199 36° 00”
00” 9°33’ 00”
00” : “ : 19°30’ 00"
~156°00"00" —-157°S7/00" = 15794" 00" —=157°S1°00" 157848700" 15784500" *-15742"00" 15723900" = -18 7936700" 15793300" 15793000" 18782700" 1572400" 18792100" 18781800" ~—-157915'00" -187°12"00" -187°09" oo" ° 06" 00’ 00”

~158°00’ 00" ~157°57' 00” ~157°54'90" -157°51’ 00” -157° 48° 00" -157°45' 00" -157° 42’ 900" -157°39/ 00" -157°36' 00” -157°33' 00" ~157°30' 00” -157%27' G0" -157°24’ 00" -157%21’ 00" -157°18' 00" -157°15' 00" -157° 12°.900" -157°09’ 00” -157°06' 00" -157°03' 00" -157°00' 00”
20°00’ 00” =

CLARK SEAMOUNT N195157W
SCALE: 1:100,000
NOS MULTIBEAM SURVEYS
Contours in corrected meter

LM119
### Part D—Federal Maritime Commission
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 99.12



        TURBODYNE REVISES THE FINANCIAL RESULTS RELEASE SCHEDULE FOR 2000


CARPINTERIA, CA - MARCH 1, 2000 - Turbodyne Technologies Inc. (EASDAQ:TRBD)
announces the following revised schedule for the release of Turbodyne's
financial results:

Annual Financial Results 1999 - March 30, 2000; first quarter 2000 - May 15,
2000; second quarter and first half 2000 - August 14, 2000; third quarter and
nine months 2000 - November 14, 2000.

The date of the Annual Shareholder Meeting is Friday, May 12, 2000.

Turbodyne Technologies Inc., a California based high technology company,
specializes in the development of charging technology for internal combustion
engines plus the development and manufacturing of high-tech assemblies for
electrically assisted turbochargers and superchargers. Turbodyne Technologies
Inc.'s headquarters is located in Carpinteria, CA; the European business
location is Frankfurt, Germany. Additional information about the company is
available on the Internet at http://www.turbodyne.com.

Contacts:

Corporate Communications, Peter Weichselbraun (800) 566-1130
VP Group Finance - Investor Relations, Ken Fitzpatrick (800) 566-1130
European Investor Relations, Markus Kumbrink +49-69-975-44-665
###### Editorial Note on Part 982

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999, and at 89 FR 38293, May 7, 2024.

#### § 982.401 Housing quality standards.

As defined in § 982.4, HQS refers to the minimum quality standards developed by HUD in accordance with 24 CFR 5.703, including any variations approved by HUD for the PHA under 24 CFR 5.705(a)(3).

[89 FR 38296, May 7, 2024]
Exhibit 8.1

Subsidiaries of TOP Tankers

                                        Country of            Portion of
Name of Significant Subsidiary          Incorporation         Ownership Interest
------------------------------          -------------         ------------------

Top Tanker Management Inc.              Marshall Islands      100%
Top Bulker Management Inc.              Marshall Islands      100%
Vermio Shipping Company Limited         Marshall Islands      100%
Rupel Shipping Company Inc.             Marshall Islands      100%
Gramos Shipping Company Inc.            Marshall Islands      100%
Olympos Shipping Company Limited        Marshall Islands      100%
Helidona Shipping Company Limited       Marshall Islands      100%
Kalidromo Shipping Company Limited      Marshall Islands      100%
Mytikas Shipping Company Limited        Marshall Islands      100%
Litochoro Shipping Company Limited      Marshall Islands      100%
Kisavos Shipping Company Limited        Marshall Islands      100%
Parnis Shipping Company Limited         Marshall Islands      100%
Imitos Shipping Company Limited         Marshall Islands      100%
Giona Shipping Company Limited          Marshall Islands      100%
Lefka Shipping Company Limited          Marshall Islands      100%
Agrafa Shipping Company Limited         Marshall Islands      100%
Nedas Shipping Company Limited          Marshall Islands      100%
Ilisos Shipping Company Limited         Marshall Islands      100%
Sperios Shipping Company Limited        Marshall Islands      100%
Ardas Shipping Company Limited          Marshall Islands      100%
Kifisos Shipping Company Limited        Marshall Islands      100%
Agion Oros Shipping Company Limited     Marshall Islands      100%
Falakro Shipping Company Limited        Liberia               100%
Psiloritis Shipping Company Limited     Liberia               100%
Pylio Shipping Company Limited          Liberia               100%
Idi Shipping Company Limited            Liberia               100%
Taygetus Shipping Company Limited       Liberia               100%
Vitsi Shipping Company Limited          Liberia               100%
Parnasos Shipping Company Limited       Liberia               100%
Pageon Shipping Company Limited         Cyprus                100%
Vardousia Shipping Company Limited      Cyprus                100%
Parnon Shipping Company Limited         Cyprus                100%
Menalo Shipping Company Limited         Cyprus                100%
Pintos Shipping Company Limited         Cyprus                100%
Top Tankers (U.K.) Limited              United Kingdom        100%

SK 23116 0001 761832