alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Proposed] Order Extending Time for Defendants to Respond to Complaint Case No. C 09-02079 JW 

1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Michael Drury, SBN 177993 

mdrury@rmwllp.com

RIEDL, MCCLOSKEY & WARING LLP 

550 West “C” Street, Suite 2050 

San Diego, California 92101 

Telephone: (619) 237-3095 

Facsimile: (619) 237-3789 

Stephen F. Gordon (BBO No. 203600) (Pro Hac Vice) 

sgordon@gordonfirm.com

Todd B. Gordon (BBO No. 652482) (Pro Hac Vice) 

tgordon@gordonfirm.com

THE GORDON LAW FIRM LLP 

101 Federal Street, 17th Floor 

Boston, Massachusetts 02110 

Telephone: (617) 261-0100 

Facsimile: (617) 261-0789 

Attorneys for Defendants 

BOULDER ENTITIES AND ROY S. MACDOWELL, JR. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

 

ANITA HUNTER, an individual; JOHNNA ) Case No. C 09-02079 JW 

BOZZA, an individual; CELLTEX SITE ) 

SERVICES, LTD., a Texas Limited ) 

Company; GRANDE INVESTMENT, LLC, ) [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

a Colorado Limited Liability Company; ) TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO 

QUIRK INFINITI, INC., a Massachusetts ) RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’

corporation; et al. ) SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 

 ) 

 Plaintiffs, ) 

 ) 

v. ) 

 ) 

CITIBANK, N.A., a Nevada Corporation; ) 

COUNTRYWIDE BANK, FSB, a Virginia ) 

Corporation; BANK OF AMERICA ) 

CORPORATION, dba BANK OF ) 

AMERICA, N.A., a North Carolina ) 

Corporation, et al., ) 

 Defendants. ) 

 ) 

Case 3:09-cv-02079-JCS Document 313 Filed 04/15/10 Page 1 of 2
[Proposed] Order Extending Time for Defendants to Respond to Complaint Case No. C 09-02079 JW 

2

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

The Court, after considering the Stipulation Extending Time for Defendants to Respond 

to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint, hereby ORDERS that Defendants BOULDER 

CAPITAL, LLC, BOULDER COLUMBUS, LLC, BOULDER WEST OAKS, LLC, BOULDER 

HOLDINGS VI, LLC, BOULDER HOLDINGS X, LLC, and ROY S. MACDOWELL, JR. shall 

have until April 23, 2010 to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended 

Complaint. 

IT IS SO ORDERED on this ______ day of ___________, 2010 

 ______________________________________ 

 Hon. James Ware 

 United States District Judge 

15th April 

Case 3:09-cv-02079-JCS Document 313 Filed 04/15/10 Page 2 of 2
121 STAT. 1818 PUBLIC LAW 110–148—DEC. 21, 2007 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3739: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 110–484 (Comm. on Natural Resources). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007): 

Dec. 11, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 14, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–148 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To amend the Arizona Water Settlements Act to modify the requirements for the 

statement of findings. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION TO REQUIREMENTS FOR STATEMENT OF 

FINDINGS. 

Section 302 of the Arizona Water Settlements Act (Public Law 

108–451; 118 Stat. 3571) is amended as follows: 

(1) In subsection (b)(5), by striking ‘‘proceedings,’’ and all 

that follows through the end of the paragraph and inserting 

‘‘proceedings;’’. 

(2) In subsection (c), by striking ‘‘subsection (a)’’ and 

inserting ‘‘subsection (b)’’. 

Approved December 21, 2007. 

Dec. 21, 2007 

[H.R. 3739] 


jbridges on POFP91QD1 with PUBLIC LAWS
#### § 91.410 Housing market analysis.

Housing market analysis must be described in the consolidated plan in accordance with the provisions of § 91.210 for the entire consortium. In addition to describing market conditions for the entire consortium, the consolidated plan may also describe these conditions for individual communities that are members of the consortium.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2506-0117)
### §2109. Public vessels

Except as otherwise provided, this subtitle does not apply to a public vessel of the United States. However, this subtitle does apply to a vessel (except a Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation vessel) owned or operated by the Department of Transportation or by any corporation organized or controlled by the Department.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 507; Pub. L. 99–509, title V, §5102(b)(3), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1927; Pub. L. 109–241, title IX, §902(e)(1), July 11, 2006, 120 Stat. 567; Pub. L. 111–281, title IX, §903(a)(5)(A), Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 3010; Pub. L. 116–260, div. AA, title V, §512(c)(6)(A), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2756.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 2109 | 46:36246:36346:391a(4) |

46:363

46:391a(4)

Section 2109 exempts public vessels from the applicability of the maritime safety and seamen's welfare laws of this subtitle although some public vessels are inspected under interagency voluntary agreements.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2020—Pub. L. 116–260 substituted "Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation" for "Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation".

2010—Pub. L. 111–281 amended directory language of Pub. L. 109–241, §902(e)(1). See 2006 Amendment note below.

2006—Pub. L. 109–241, §902(e)(1), as amended by Pub. L. 111–281, struck out "a Coast Guard or" after "(except".

1986—Pub. L. 99–509 substituted "Except as otherwise provided, this" for "This".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Pub. L. 111–281, title IX, §903(a), Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 3010, provided that the amendment by section 903(a)(5)(A) is effective with enactment of Pub. L. 109–241.
### **CHAPTER 403—AGREEMENTS**

Sec.
40301.
Application.
40302.
Filing requirements.
40303.
Content requirements.
40304.
Commission action.
40305.
Assessment agreements.
40306.
Nondisclosure of information.
40307.
Exemption from antitrust laws.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cellu Tissue
Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended February 28, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certifies that:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrants.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ DAVID J. MORRIS                                       
|David J. Morris                                           
|Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief
Financial Officer
|April 30, 2010                                            
|
Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on form
10-K/A, of Great Wolf Resorts, Inc.;
    a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    /s/ KIMBERLY K. SCHAEFERKimberly K. SchaeferChief Executive Officer 9
#### Janice Puner et al. v. Frances Wiener et al.

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person denied with leave to renew upon proper papers. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.
|   | Subsidiaries of MISCOR Group, Ltd.  |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                |   |   |   |
|   | Name                                |   | Jurisdiction of Organization |   |
|   | Magnetech Industrial Services, Inc. |   | Indiana |   |
|   | Martell Electric, LLC               |   | Indiana |   |
|   | HK Engine Components, LLC           |   | Indiana |   |
|   | Ideal Consolidated, Inc.            |   | Indiana |   |
|   | American Motive Power, Inc.         |   | Nevada |   |
|   |                                |   |   |   |
Exhibit 32.1









CERTIFICATION




By signing below, each of the undersigned officers hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, (i) this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained
in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MISCOR Group, Ltd.




Date: April 19, 2010.







/s/ John A. MartellJohn A. MartellChief Executive Officer/s/ Michael D. TopaMichael D. TopaInterim Chief Financial Officer
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00138

- CV

IN RE REGINALD DALE PETERS RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------

The co urt has considered relator’s petition for writ of ma ndamus and is of

the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, WALKER, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: May 8 , 2014

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8 (d).
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3303

To suspend temporarily the deposit requirements and assessments of countervailing duties and antidumping duties on imports of CHQ wire rod 

covered by certain countervailing and antidumping duty orders. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2005

Mr. KIRK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the deposit requirements and assessments of countervailing duties and antidumping duties 

on imports of CHQ wire rod covered by certain countervailing and antidumping duty orders.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF CERTAIN COUNTERVAILING 

4 AND ANTIDUMPING DUTIES. 

5 (a) SUSPENSION.—

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—No countervailing duty and 

7 no antidumping duty deposit shall be required upon 

8 entry of the products described in paragraph (2), 
2

•HR 3303 IH 

1 and no countervailing duty and no antidumping duty 

2 shall be assessed on such products, notwithstanding 

3 any order of the Department of Commerce or the 

4 Bureau of Customs and Border Protection in the 

5 following cases: C–351–833 (Brazil); A–351–832 

6 (Brazil); A–122–840 (Canada); A–560–815 (Indo7 nesia); A–201–830 (Mexico); A–841–805 (Moldova); 

8 A–274–804 (Trinidad & Tobago); and A–823–812 

9 (Ukraine). 

10 (2) PRODUCTS.—The products referred to in 

11 paragraph (1) are steel wire rod suitable for cold 

12 heading, forging, and thread rolling, and meeting 

13 ASTM F2882 for use in making certain fasteners 

14 (‘‘Cold Heading Quality’’ or ‘‘CHQ’’ wire rod), pro15 vided for in subheadings 7213.91.30 and 7227.90.60 

16 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 

17 States. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—

19 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) applies to 

20 any entry, or withdrawal from warehouse for con21 sumption, that is made during the period beginning 

22 on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending 

23 on December 31, 2007. 
3

•HR 3303 IH 

1 (2) RETROACTIVE APPLICATION.—Notwith2 standing section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or 

3 any other provision of law, the entry of any article—

4 (A) that was made before the date of the 

5 enactment of this Act and is unliquidated as of 

6 such date of enactment, and 

7 (B) for which no countervailing duty or 

8 antidumping duty deposit or assessment would 

9 have been made had subsection (a) been in ef10 fect on the date of such entry, 

11 shall be liquidated without assessment of any coun12 tervailing duty or antidumping duty, and the Sec13 retary of the Treasury shall refund any counter14 vailing duty or antidumping duty deposit paid, with 

15 interest provided by law, with respect to such entry.

Æ
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 17 , 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., D/B/A REPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL 

AND SCOT SPENCER 

AIRLIFT GROUP, INC. 

AND RICHARD BERNARD 

Unauthorized Air Transportation, Unfair and Deceptive 

Practices and Unfair Methods of Competition, and 

Violations of Public Charter Rules 

EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of 

Competition, and Violations of Public Charter Rules 

Enforcement Proceeding 

STATUS REPORT 

·-·· ;,,... 

DOT -OST -1995-272 

formerly 

Docket 49233 

The Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and 

Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22,2006, Order 

staying this proceeding, files this report detailing the current status of this proceeding and 

settlement negotiations. 

The Department has not ruled on the outstanding motions filed by Respondents 

and opposed by the Enforcement Office in Ascend Aviation Group, Docket OST-2004-

17486. 
2 

There have been no further settlement discussions. 

Date: December 28, 2012. 

Respectfully submitted, 

amuel Podberesky 

Assistant General Counsel for 

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

~li~j0~ Senior Trial Attorney 

United States Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Room 96-429 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: 202-366-9342 

FAX: 202-366-7152 
3 

Docket No. DOT-OST-1995-272 

I hereby certify that on this 28th day ofDecember, 2012, a true and correct copy ofthe 

foregoing Status Report was served in the following manner to the following: 

Original 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-3 0 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey A~enue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

By First Class Mail 

The Honorable Ronnie A Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: (202) 366-2142 

FAX: (202) 366-7536 

By First Class Mail 

Scot Spencer 

SBD Aircraft Services 

25 5 S Leland Norton Way 

Sam Bernardino, CA 92408
§ 884.108 Term of housing assistance payments contract. ( a ) Except in the case of a Contract described in paragraph (b) of this section, the Contract shall be for an initial term of 20 years: *Provided,* That at the end of such Contract term and at the request of RHCDS, HUD may, subject to the availability of contract and budget authority, authorize the execution of a new Contract providing for a total Contract term of an additional 20 years.
( b ) In the case of a Contract under which housing assistance payments are made with respect to a project owned by a State or local agency, the total Contract term may be equal to the term of such financing but may not exceed 40 years for any dwelling unit.
( c ) If the project is completed in stages, the dates for the initial and the renewal terms shall be separately related to the units in each stage: *Provided, however,* That the total Contract term for the units in all the stages, beginning with the effective date of the Contract with respect to the first stage, may not exceed the overall maximum term allowable for any one unit, plus two years.
[41 FR 47168, Oct. 27, 1976. Redesignated at 45 FR 6909, Jan. 30, 1980, and amended at 48 FR 12710, Mar. 28, 1983; 49 FR 17449, Apr. 24, 1984; 61 FR 13593, Mar. 27, 1996]
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3219

To reduce temporarily the duty on Cyhalofop. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 12, 2005

Mr. BUYER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To reduce temporarily the duty on Cyhalofop.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CYHALOFOP. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.86 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 propanoic acid) is amended—

7 (1) by striking ‘‘Free’’ and inserting ‘‘1.5%’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2

•HR 3219 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
----

| 1. | the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                     |   | /s/    Thomas A. Borner                     |
|------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  September 23, 2011 |   | Thomas A. Borner                                                                                   |
|                                     |   |  Chief Executive Officer                                                                      |
|                                     |   |                                                                                               |
|                                     |   | /s/    Robert J. Halloran, Jr.         |
| Date:  September 23, 201  |   | Robert J. Halloran, Jr.                                                                            |
|                                     |   | President and Treasurer                                                                            |
### §617v. Repealed. Pub. L. 85–900, §17, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1735

Section, act July 31, 1953, ch. 296, title II, 67 Stat. 250, which was not enacted as part of the Boulder Canyon Project Act (which comprises this subchapter), provided for taxation of leaseholds lying within Boulder Canyon Project Reservation and deduction of certain school taxes in Boulder City Union School District.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOANNE CONWRIGHT,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF OAKLAND, et al.,

Defendants.

NO. C09-2572 TEH

SCHEDULING ORDER AND

ORDER VACATING ORDERS

TO SHOW CAUSE

Plaintiff’s counsel has submitted late payment of the $50.00 sanction discussed in the

June 30, 2010 Order to Show Cause, and Plaintiff also has filed an opposition to Defendants’

pending motion to dismiss. In addition, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s timely written

response to the July 27, 2010 Order to Show Cause as to why this case should not be

dismissed and sanctions should not be imposed. The Court now finds good cause to place

Defendants’ motion to dismiss back on calendar with no further sanctions to Plaintiff’s

counsel. However, counsel is advised that failure to comply with the Court’s rules and

deadlines in the future will be subject to additional sanctions.

With good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The June 30 and July 27 Orders to Show Cause are hereby VACATED.

2. The hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss shall be held on September 13,

2010, at 10:00 AM. Defendants’ reply shall be filed on or before August 23, 2010.

//

//

Case 3:09-cv-02572-TEH Document 29 Filed 08/09/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

3. The case management conference currently scheduled for August 23, 2010, shall

be continued to October 4, 2010, at 1:30 PM. The parties shall meet and confer and file a

joint case management conference statement on or before September 27, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 08/09/10 

THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:09-cv-02572-TEH Document 29 Filed 08/09/10 Page 2 of 2