1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND

Case No. C 09-01246-CRB

MICHAEL A. FIRESTEIN, SBN 110622

mfirestein@proskauer.com

PROSKAUER ROSE LLP

2049 Century Park East, 32nd Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90067-3206

Telephone: (310) 557-2900

Facsimile: (310) 557-2193

STEVEN M. BAUER, 

Admitted pro hac vice 

sbauer@proskauer.com

JACOB K. BARON, 

Admitted pro hac vice

jbaron@proskauer.com

PROSKAUER ROSE LLP

One International Place

Boston, MA 01220

Telephone: (617) 526-9600

Facsimile: (617) 526-9899

Attorneys for Defendant, 

Sony Electronics Inc.

DAVID N. KUHN, SBN 73389

dnkuhn@pacbell.net

Attorney-at-Law

144 Hagar Avenue

Piedmont, CA 94611

Telephone: (510) 653-4983

Attorney for Plaintiff,

Gregory Bender

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY BENDER

Plaintiff,

v.

SONY ELECTRONICS INC., a Delaware

corporation,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 09-CV-01246-CRB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO 

RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED 

COMPLAINT

RECITALS

WHEREAS, the Complaint of Plaintiff Gregory Bender (“Plaintiff”) in this action was 

filed on or about March 23, 2009;

WHEREAS, the Amended Complaint of Plaintiff in this action was filed on or about May 

20, 2009;

Case 3:09-cv-01246-EDL Document 48 Filed 01/12/10 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND

Case No. C 09-01246-CRB

WHEREAS, a Second Amended Complaint of Plaintiff was filed on December 21, 2009 

which amends the party names and the accused products;

WHEREAS, Defendant Sony Electronics Inc.’s (“Sony’s”) response to Plaintiff’s Second 

Amended Complaint is due on January 7, 2010; and

WHEREAS, this additional time will not interfere with any other deadlines set by the 

Court in this matter.

STIPULATION

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the

parties, through their counsel, that the time within which Sony shall be required to file its answer, 

motion, counterclaim, cross-claim and/or other responses to Plaintiff’s Second Amended 

Complaint in this action shall be extended to and including January 19, 2010. 

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT

 DATED: January 6, 2010 STEVEN M. BAUER

MICHAEL A. FIRESTEIN

JACOB K. BARON

PROSKAUER ROSE LLP

/s/ Jacob K. Baron

Jacob K. Baron

Attorneys for Defendant,

Sony Electronics Inc.

 DATED: January 6, 2010 DAVID N. KUHN

/s/ David N. Kuhn

David N. Kuhn

Attorney for Plaintiff,

Gregory Bender

Case 3:09-cv-01246-EDL Document 48 Filed 01/12/10 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3-

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND

Case No. C 09-01246-CRB

DECLARATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45, § X.B

I, Jacob K. Baron, hereby declare pursuant to General Order 45, § X.B, that I have 

obtained the concurrence on the filing of this document from the all the signatories listed above.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing declaration is true and correct.

 DATED: January 6, 2010

/s/ Jacob K. Baron

Jacob K. Baron

Case 3:09-cv-01246-EDL Document 48 Filed 01/12/10 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-4-

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND

Case No. C 09-01246-CRB

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Having considered the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause appearing, 

(1) The time within which Sony shall be required to file its answer, motion, 

counterclaim, cross-claim and/or other response to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint in this 

action shall be extended to and including January 19, 2010. 

IT IS SO ORDERED

DATED: January __, 2010 _______________________________

The Honorable Charles R. Breyer

Judge of the United States District Court, 

Northern District of California

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:09-cv-01246-EDL Document 48 Filed 01/12/10 Page 4 of 4